Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSUB2012-00011 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TYPE II LAND USE PERMIT APPLICANT: MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE LYNNE ROGERSON TRUSTEE 2133 OAK BAY RD PORT HADLOCK WA 98339-9778 DATE ISSUED: February 12, 2013 DATE EXPIRES: February 13, 2016 MLA NUMBER: MLA12-00141 PROJECT PLANNER: Michelle Farfan PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Three (3) Lot Short Plat with SEPA: The proposal is to subdivide 34.54-acres into three residential lots. Lot 1 will consist of 13.35-acres, Lot 2 will be 11.15-acres and Lot 3 will be 10.04 acres. Lot 1 has an existing single family sin le famil residence and several detached out-buildings served by an on-site septic system and two I accessed by Disney Road. Access to Lot 1 is via Baldwin Road. Lots 2 and 3 are vacant and will be y y on-site wells. The parcels are located within the Quimper public water system and Lots 2 & 3 would be served by an on-site septic system. A wetland has been identified on the parcel that spans all 3 of the proposed lots and requires a 60-foot buffer. Development of the lots will occur outside the wetland and its associated buffer. PROJECT LOCATION: Parcel number 921 094 026, Lot 1, in Section 9, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM, located on Baldwin Rd, Nordland, WA 98358-9608 CONDITIONS: 1.) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS: All easements of record shall be graphically portrayed on the final plat with the Auditor's File Number (AFN) of the easement(s) also referenced on the face of the plat. 2.) East Marrowstone Road, Baldwin Road and Disney Road shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final mylar. 3.) The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": In order to provide adequate turnaround for fire and emergency vehicles, the initial 30 foot segment of the driveway from Disney Road to the residences on Lots 2 and 3 shall have a minimum 20 foot width with a minimum 6 inches compacted gravel base and 2 inches compacted crushed rock. 4.) The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": Disney Rod is a private road. There is not a road maintenance agreement for Disney Road. 5.) Existing addresses shall be verified for accuracy and consistency with the 911 Emergency Locator System Ordinance and if corrections to addresses are required, they shall be made prior to final plat approval. 6.) Address plates for the lots shall be located in accordance with the provisions of the Jefferson County 911 Emergency Locator System Ordinance. 7.) In accordance with the Jefferson County Fee Schedule Ordinance, the Public Works Department charges an hourly fee for application and plan reviews, project inspections, meetings, hearings, and final review. The proponent shall pay all fees incidental to the proposal prior to final approval. In the event that approval for the proposal is denied by Jefferson County or the proponent does not complete the proposal, the proponent shall still be responsible for paying the Department's fees. The Department's fee is currently$79 per hour. 8.) The proponent shall submit a blue line copy of the site plan and lot closure information prepared by a licensed surveyor to the Department for review. The proponent shall make any corrections or additions prior to final approval. 9.) After all preliminary plat conditions are met; the proponent shall submit a final mylar of the plat to the Department for approval by the Director of Public Works. 10.) HEALTH DEPARTMENT: The location of the soil test pits and corresponding test pit number shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final plat. 11.) Resolve the issue of the location of the reserved drainfield site for the northern most home permitted under SEP03-00063. Requires one of the following: a. Make application to re-designate the reserve drainfield area; septic designer required, or b. Adjust the proposed property line. 12.) Show the reserve drainfield area for the southern most home permitted under SEP03-00064. 13.) Each septic system must have a current Operation & Maintenance inspection. 14.) All existing wells must be labeled not approved for potable water supply" and state the intended use of the wells. If the wells are unusable (as defined by WAC 173-160-381) they shall be decommissioned in accordance with WAC173-160-381 and comply with Jefferson County Health Department Policy Statement 96-02. 15.) Label the wells with the unique ID number on the well tag, if available. 16.) Water meters and water lines to serve each parcel shall be installed to meet the requirements of Jefferson County Code (JCC) 18.35.130(1)(b). The meters and/or water line locations as installed shall be graphically depicted on the face of the final mylar. 17.) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION: Based on requirements of Chapter 18.35 JCC Final Short Plat, the final mylar shall be prepared in accordance with the final short plat checklist. A copy of Chapter 18.35 JCC is attached. 18.) An accurate vicinity map shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final plat. 19.) The final blue line shall depict the name of the subdivision and the county assigned number of SUB12-00011/MLA12-00141 on all sheets of the mylar. 20.) The distance of 1302.32 shown on the north line of the proposed short plat does not include the road. However, the dashed line showing the beginning and the ending points of the distance indicates that it does include the road. 21.) All existing structures shall be accurately labeled as to their current use. 22.) Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48 RCW, Water Pollution Control and WAC 173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, and is subject to enforcement action. 23.) Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent stormwater runoff from carrying soil and other pollutants into surface water or storm drains that lead to waters of the state. Sand, silt, clay particles, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered to be pollutants. 24.) During construction, all releases of oils, hydraulic fluids, fuels, other petroleum products, paints, solvents, and other deleterious materials must be contained and removed in a manner that will prevent their discharge to waters and soils of the state. Cleanup of spills should take precedence over other work on the site. 25.) Clearing limits and/or any easements or required buffers shall be identified and marked in the field prior to the start of any clearing, grading, or construction. Some suggested methods are staking and flagging or high visibility fencing. 26.) A permanent vegetative cover shall be established on denuded areas at final grade if they are not otherwise permanently stabilized. 27.) Properties adjacent to the site of a land disturbance shall be protected from sediment deposition through the use of buffers or other perimeter controls, such as filter fence or sediment basins. 28.) All temporary erosion control systems shall be designed to contain the runoff from the developed two year, 24-hour design storm without eroding. 29.) Provision shall be made to minimize the tracking of sediment by construction vehicles onto paved public roads. If sediment is deposited, it should be cleaned every day by shoveling or sweeping. Water cleaning should only be done after the area has been shoveled or swept. 30.) Wash water from paint and wall finishing equipment shall be disposed of in a way which will not adversely impact waters of the state. Untreated disposal of this wastewater is a violation of State Water Quality laws and statutes and, as such, would be subject to enforcement action. 31.) This project may require a construction stormwater permit (also known as National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and State Waste Discharge General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction). This permit is required for projects which meet both of the following conditions: a. One or more acres of soil surface area will be disturbed by construction activities. b. The site already has off-site discharge to waters of the state or storm drains or will have off-site discharge during construction. An application with instructions can be downloaded from Ecology's website at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/stormwater/construction/-Application. Construction site operators must apply for a permit at least 60 days prior to discharging stormwater. 32.) A minimum 60 foot wetland buffer width shall be applied to the Category III wetland. Wetland buffer widths shall be measured along a horizontal line perpendicular to the wetland boundary. The buffer shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final mylar. 33.) The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": Wetland buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. A permanent physical separation along the upland boundary of the wetland buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Wetland buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred (100) feet, whichever is less. Signs shall be in place prior to and during construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Buffer- Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." All construction activities shall not encroach upon the wetland buffers. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. Lighting from any source shall be directed away from the wetland buffers. 34.) An updated plat certificate or supplement shall be submitted with the final blueline and shall be 30 days current. 35.) Certificates for the Board of County Commissioners, Clerk of the Board, Director of the Department of Public Works, Department of Community Development Administrator and Environmental Health Department need to be added. 36.) Utilities and transportation facilities should be installed in the same rights-of-way when the effect will be to reduce the adverse impacts on the physical environment. 37.) The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire safety, health or sanitary hazard. Not more than 2 unlicensed vehicles shall be stored on any lot unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC. Outdoor storage of 3 or more junk motor vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk (or salvage) yard and allowed as a permitted use in Table 3-1 or Chapter 18.18 JCC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of JCC 18.20.100, Automobile wrecking yards and junk (or salvage) yards. In no case, shall any such junk motor vehicles be stored in a critical area. 38.) The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet(20') in height from the finished grade excepting when such lighting is an integral part of building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. Exterior lighting shall be energy efficient and shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflections are contained within the boundaries of the parcel. Exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights-of-way. No lighting shall blink, flash, or be of unusually high intensity or brightness. All lighting fixtures shall be appropriate in scale, intensity, and height to the use they are serving. 39.) The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": Maximum building height shall not exceed 35 feet. Maximum impervious surface coverage shall not exceed 25%. Minimum setbacks from Baldwin Road and Disney Road rights-of-ways shall be 20 feet. Minimum side yard setbacks shall be 5 feet. 40.) The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": Any further subdivision of the lots within this plat will be subject to the densities permitted in the Jefferson County Ordinances and Codes in effect at time of such application. These lots may or may not be further subdivided in the future. Approval of this subdivision does not constitute approval of building or sewage disposal permits on each lot. Permit approval will be subject to building lot plans, type of use, contours, and soils on individual lots. Permits will be reviewed in accordance with site conditions and regulations existing on the date the permits are applied for. Any removal of or major disturbance of soil within the proposed drainfield areas may create site conditions that are unacceptable of the installation of sewage disposal systems. 41.) Consistent with RCW 84.56.345, current year and, if applicable, all delinquent property taxes including compensating tax from open space program shall be paid in full prior to the Treasurer signing the mylar and paper copies of the short plat. 42.) The applicant must submit a reproducible copy plus seven (7) paper copies of the proposed final short plat to the Department of Community Development. The proposed final short shall contain elements as described in Chapter 18.35.120 JCC and shall include certifications and other requirements as provided in Chapter 18.35.190 JCC and 18.35.370 JCC. 43.) NOTICE: The sale of lots prior to final short plat approval is unlawful. 44.) EXPIRATION: Preliminary approval will expire on February 12, 2016. The Department of Community Development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of impending preliminary short plat expiration. 45.) SUBMISSION: It is the responsibility of the applicant or authorized representative to ensure the final short plat is submitted in accordance with the conditions of preliminary approval. This includes paying all property taxes and submitting a recording fee for the final plat and supply an updated plat certificate (within 30 days of submittal), all of which is outlined in the final short plat checklist. FINDINGS: 1.) The Administrator finds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code, all other applicable ordinances and regulations, and is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map. APPEALS: Pursuant to ROW 36.70C, the applicant or any aggrieved party may appeal this final decision to the Hearing Examiner within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date of issuance of this land use decision. For more information related to administrative appeals see JCC 18.40.330. 1 ■m`_�� 41 2,=,kS `47' Ad inistrator MLA12-00141 \\tidemark\data\forms\F MLT_IssuePermit U.rpt 2/12/2013 Page4of4 it Colleen Zmolek From: Stacie Hoskins [shoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 10:41 AM To: #Planning Team Subject: Agenda request procedure Agenda request procedure: 1. Prepare the AR (also includes consent agenda requests) 2. Have internal DCD review and signatures 3. PDF the AR and all attachments 4. Email County Administrator's Office (CAO) staff at CAOstaff @co.lefferson.wa.us • AR in both word and pdf format . A • Provide any attachments in pdf format.- _ l�_^; 5. Make copies "°I°" • 5 copies of the AR (one each to: DCD director, Planning Mgr, Michelle M (LRP lead), Planner for usage at meeting, and case file) • 14 copies of the attachments 6. Send packet CAO via interoffice or personally deliver if under deadline. This includes: • One original AR—signed - • 9 conies of any attachments 7. Distribute DCD copies of packet: one each to: • DCD director, • Planning Mgr, • Michelle M (LRP lead), • Planner for usage at meeting, and • case file Stacie,G'. qicididord Planning Manager Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 Fax 360-379-4451 shoskins@co.jefferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW `-A SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 1 Chapter 18.35.120 JCC Preliminary short plat contents. (1) A preliminary short plat shall be submitted on one or more sheets and shall provide the information described below. All specifications for required improvements shall conform to the development standards contained in Chapter 18.30 JCC. (a) The name of the proposed subdivisions together with the words "Preliminary Short Plat"; (b) The name and address of the applicant; (c) The name, address, stamp and signature of the professional engineer or professional land surveyor who prepared the preliminary plat; (d) Numeric scale (50 feet or fewer to the inch), graphic scale, true north point, and date of preparation; (e) Identification of all land intended to be cleared, and the location of the proposed access to the site for clearing and grading during site development or construction; and (f) A form for the endorsement of the administrator, as follows: APPROVED BY JEFFERSON COUNTY Department of Community Date Development Administrator (2) The preliminary plat shall contain a vicinity sketch sufficient to define the location and boundaries of the proposed subdivision with respect to surrounding property, roads, and other major constructed and natural features. (3) Except as otherwise specified in this chapter, the preliminary short plat shall contain the following existing geographic features, drawn lightly in relation to proposed geographic features: (a) The boundaries of the property to be subdivided, and the boundaries of any adjacent property under the same ownership as the land to be subdivided, to be indicated by bold lines; (b) The names of all adjoining property owners, or names of adjoining developers; (c) All existing property lines lying within the proposed subdivision, including lot lines for lots of record which are to be vacated, and all existing property lines for any property adjacent to the subject property which is under the same ownership as the property to be subdivided (as described in JCC 18.35.110(3)) shall be shown in broken lines; (d) The location, right-of-way widths, pavement widths and names of all existing or platted roads, whether public or private, and other public ways within 200 feet of the property to be divided; (e) The location, widths and purposes of any existing easements lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision; (f) The location, size and invert elevation of sanitary sewer lines and stormwater management facilities lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision or those that will be connected to the subdivision as part of the proposal (if applicable); (g) The location and size of existing water system facilities including all fire hydrants lying Y Y 9 within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision or those which will be connected to as part of the proposed subdivision (if applicable); (h) The location, size and description of any other underground and overhead facilities lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision (if applicable); (i) The location of any environmentally sensitive areas as described in Article VI-D of Chapter 18.15 JCC, including all floodplains lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision; (i) The location of existing sections and municipal corporation boundary lines lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision; (k) The location of any well and associated setbacks existing within the proposed subdivision; (I) The location of any individual or on-site sewage disposal system existing within the proposed subdivision; (m) Existing contour lines at intervals of five feet, labeled at intervals not to exceed 20 feet; (n) The location of any existing structures lying within the proposed subdivision; existing structures to be removed shall be indicated by broken lines, and existing structures not to be removed shall be indicated by solid lines. (4) The preliminary plat shall show the following proposed geographic features: (a) The boundaries in bold solid lines of any proposed lots, tracts or parcels, the area and dimensions of each proposed lot, tract or parcel, and the proposed identifying number or letter to be assigned to each lot, tract or parcel, and block (if applicable); (b) The right-of-way location and width, the proposed name of each road, street or other public way to be created and the estimated tentative grades of such roads; where roadways may exceed the maximum allowable grade or alignment, the director of the department of public works may require sufficient data, including centerline profiles and cross-sections, if necessary, to determine the feasibility of said roadway; (c) The location, width and purpose of each easement to be created; (d) The boundaries, dimensions and area of public and common park and open space areas; (e) Identification of all areas proposed to be dedicated for public use, together with the purpose and any condition of dedication; (f) Proposed final contour lines at intervals of five feet; final contour lines shall be indicated by solid lines; contour lines shall be labeled in intervals not to exceed 20 feet; (g) The building envelope, as defined in JCC 18.10.020, shall be indicated for each lot; (h) Proposed monumentation; (i) Proposed location and description of all individual or community wells, or water system improvements, including fire hydrants (if applicable); Q) Proposed location and description of all sewage disposal improvements, including (if applicable) profiles and all pump stations and their connections to the existing system; (k) Proposed location and description of all stormwater management improvements; (I) Proposed road cross-sections, showing bicycle and pedestrian pathways, trails and sidewalks (if applicable); (m) Proposed type and location of road lighting (if applicable); (n) Proposed type and location of landscaping (if applicable); (o) Proposed location and description of transit stops and shelters (if applicable); (p) Proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs) on development (if applicable). (5) Upon review of an application, the administrator may require additional pertinent information, as deemed necessary, to satisfy any other regulatory requirements. The administrator may also waive specific submittal requirements determined to be unnecessary for review of an application. In such event, the administrator shall document the waiver in the project file or log. [Ord. 11-00 § 7.3(4)] Chapter 18.35.190 JCC Accompanying documents — Final short plat. (1) In cases where any restrictive deed covenants or CC&Rs will apply to lots or parcels within a subdivision, a type written copy of such covenants, bearing all necessary signatures, shall be submitted along with the final plat. Where the recordation of specific deed restrictions or CC&R provisions have been required as a condition of preliminary plat approval, the administrator shall approve and sign the deed restriction or CC&Rs prior to final plat approval. (2) The final plat shall be accompanied by a current (i.e., within 30 days) title company certification of the following: (a) The legal description of the total parcel sought to be subdivided; (b) Those individuals or corporations holding an ownership interest and any security interest (such as deeds or trust or mortgages) or any other encumbrances affecting the title of said parcel. Such individuals or corporations shall sign and approve the final plat prior to final approval; (c) Any lands to be dedicated shall be confirmed as being owned in fee title by the owner(s) signing the dedication certificate; (d) Any easements or restrictions affecting the property to be subdivided with a description of purpose and referenced by the auditor's file number and/or recording number; and (e) If lands are to be dedicated or conveyed to the county as part of the subdivision, an American Land Title Association (A.L.T.A.) policy may be required by the director of the department of public works. (3) All maintenance, performance and guarantee bonds or other guarantees as may be required by the director of the department of public works and the approved improvement method report to guarantee the acceptability and/or performance of all required improvements. [Ord. 11-00 § 7.3(11)] Chapter 18.35.370 JCC Preparation of a final long plat. The final long plat shall be prepared in accordance with the following requirements: (1) The final plat shall be prepared by a land surveyor licensed by the state of Washington or a Washington state licensed engineer. (2) Six paper copies of the final long plat shall be submitted, measuring 18 inches by 24 inches in size, allowing one-half inch for border. (3) A final long plat shall contain the following information: (a) The name of the subdivision; (b) Legal description of the property being subdivided; (c) Numeric scale, graphic scale, true north point and date of preparation of the final plat; (d) The lot line of the plat, referenced to county (USC&GS) datum and based on an accurate traverse, with angular and linear dimensions and bearings; (e) The exact location, width and name of all roads, streets, alleys and other public ways within and adjacent to the subdivision; (f) The exact location, width and purpose of all easements and dedications for rights-of- way provided for public and private services and utilities; (g) True courses and distances to the nearest established road lines, or sections or quarter section corner monuments which shall accurately locate the subdivision; (h) Section lines accurately tied to the lines of the plat by distances and courses; (i) All lot and block numbers (if applicable) and lines, with accurate dimensions in feet and hundredths of feet; (j) All house address numbers as assigned by the county; (k) Delineation of the building envelope of each lot; (I) The radii, internal angles, points of curvature, tangent bearings and lengths of arc; (m) The accurate location of each permanent control monument; (n) All plat meander lines or reference lines along bodies of water shall be established as above, but not farther than 20 feet from the high water line of such body; (o) Accurate outlines and legal descriptions of any areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose of such dedication or reservation and any limitations indicated thereon and in dedication; (p) Accurate outlines of any area to be reserved by the deed covenant for common use of owners of property within the subdivision, together with the purposes of such reservation; (q) Any restrictions or conditions on the lots or tracts within the subdivision, as required by the county or at the discretion of the property owner, including but not limited to environmentally sensitive areas buffers; (r) The auditor's file number of all documents and conveyances recorded with the Jefferson County auditor associated with preliminary or final plat approval; (s) The name and seal of the Washington State licensed land surveyor or Washington State licensed engineer responsible preparation of the final plat, and a signed certification on the plat by said surveyor to the effect that it is a true and correct representation of the land actually surveyed by him or her, that the existing monuments shown thereon exist as located and that all dimensional and geodetic details are correct; (t) A signed, notarized certification stating that the subdivision has been made with the free consent and in accordance with the desires of the all persons with ownership and/or security interests in the property. If the plat includes a dedication, the certificate or a separate written instrument shall contain the dedication of all roads and other areas to the public, any individual or individuals, or to any corporation, public or private, as shown on the plat. Such certificate or instrument shall be signed and acknowledged before a notary public by all parties having any interest in the land subdivided. The owner shall waive all claims against the county, on behalf of the owner and the owner's successors and assigns, which may be occasioned by the establishment and/or construction of any roads, streets, storm drainage improvements or other improvements; (u) An offer of dedication may include a waiver of right of direct access to any road from any property. Such waiver may be required by the director of the department of public works as a condition of approval. Any dedication, donation or grant as shown on the face of the plat shall be considered as a quit claim deed to the said donee or grantee for use for the purpose intended by the donation or grant; (v) Signature blocks for the appropriate certification of the county auditor, director of the department of public works, director of the public health department, and DCD administrator, as follows: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CERTIFICATE I hereby certify to the best of my knowledge that this final plat is in compliance with the certificate of improvements issued pursuant to the Jefferson County Unified Development Code and is consistent with all applicable county improvement standards and requirements in force on the date of preliminary plat approval, this day of , 20_ Director, Jefferson County Department of Public Works DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR'S CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that on this day of , 20_, that this final plat is in substantial conformance with the preliminary plat and any conditions attached thereto, which preliminary plat was approved by Jefferson County on the day of , 20 Administrator, Jefferson County Community Development Department JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DIRECTOR CERTIFICATE Approved by public health department the on this day of , 20_ Director, Jefferson County Public Health Dept. TREASURER All taxes and/or assessments due are paid in full on this day of 20 Jefferson County Treasurer (w) A form of the approval of the County assessor, as follows: ASSESSOR'S APPROVAL Examined and approved this day of , 20_ Jefferson County Assessor Attest: Deputy Jefferson County Assessor (x) A form for the certificate of the Jefferson County recorder, as follows: RECORDING CERTIFICATE Filed for record at the request of Jefferson County this day of 20 , at minutes past_M., and recorded in Volume of Plats, page Records of Jefferson County, Washington. Jefferson County Recording Number Manager Superintendent of Records (y) Any additional pertinent information as required at the discretion of the director of the department of public works or the DCD administrator. (4) All signatures or certifications appearing on a final plat shall in be reproducible black ink. [Ord. 11-00 § 7.4(11)] • JEFFERSON COUNTY Consent Agenda BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CONSENT AGENDA REQUEST TO: Board of County Commissioners Port Townsend City Council Philip Morley, County A inistrator FROM: Carl Smith, Director Stacie Hoskins, Planning Manager cult.... Colleen Zmolek,Associate Planner of erson County COS DATE: February 24,2014 SUBJECT: Final Short Plat Approval for Mauney/Rogerson Trust Short Plat MLA12-00141 /SUB12-00011 ATTACHED: 1. Short Plat 2. Administrative Summary Decision 3. Preliminary Short Plat Approval STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Final short plat approval of East Marrowstone Road, Baldwin Road and Disney Road,Nordland. Requesting final approval by the Board per JCC Section 18.35.200 and RCW 58.17.170. Applicants are Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson. BACKGROUND: Staff determined that the application as submitted on June 19, 2012 met said criteria of Jefferson County Code (JCC) Section 18.35.100 in written Findings and Conclusions dated February 12, 2013. Written Findings and Conclusions are required per RCW 58.17.195 which state in part that a county makes a formal written finding of fact that are proposed subdivision or proposed short subdivision is in conformity with applicable zoning ordinance or other land use controls which may exist. Alternatives: The requested action is mandatory per RCW 58.17.170 and Jefferson County Code Section 18.35.130(1)(c). FISCAL IMPACT/COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS: There is no identifiable fiscal impact related to this request for final plat approval. Applicant has paid 2014 full year property taxes in the amount of$18,549.14 RECOMMENDATION: Per Jefferson County Ordinance and Sate Law,the department requests that the Board grant final short plat approval and adopt the written findings and conclusions. REVIEWED BY: Aropr grip _ 7-7(7(/'-i P ' ip Mor e : ., •� tmstrator Date 1 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY DECISION Marc Mauney&Lynne Rogerson MAUNEY/ ROGERSON SHORT PLAT; SUB12-00011/MLA12-00141 Proposal: The proposal is to subdivide 34.54-acres into three residential lots. Lot 1 will consist of 13.35-acres, Lot 2 will be 11.15-acres and Lot 3 will be 10.04 acres. Lot 1 has two existing single family residences, each served by an on- site septic system, and several detached out-buildings and two on-site wells. Access to Lot 1 is via Baldwin Road. Lots 2 and 3 are vacant and will be accessed by Disney Road. The parcels are located within the Quimper public water system and Lots 2 & 3 would be served by an on-site septic system. A wetland has been identified on the parcel that spans all 3 of the proposed lots and requires a 60-foot buffer. Development of the lots will occur outside the wetland and its associated buffer. Property Location: The property is located at 91 Baldwin Road,Nordland; at the intersection of SR 116 and Robbins Road take Robbins Road south and then east to the intersection of Baldwin Road and Disney Road. Parcel is to the east of Baldwin Road and south of Disney Road. Legal Description: APN 921-094-026; Gov't Lot 1 except the right-of-way for a public road granted to Jefferson County over the west 15 feet of the north 660 feet of said Gov't Lot 1 as conveyed by deed recorded under AFN 75494 in Vol. 1 of Road Waivers, Page 548 records of Jefferson County, Washington within Section 9,Township 29 North Range 1 East, WM. Property Description: The parcel slopes to the south/southeast. Disney Road runs parallel to the north property boundary and Baldwin Road runs parallel to the west property boundary. The southeast property boundary runs parallel to the shoreline. Proposed Lot 1 has two existing single family residences, out buildings, two septic systems and two on-site wells. There is a drainage ditch that starts at the middle of Disney Road and runs to the south property line. A category III wetland exists on-site near the shoreline that spans all three proposed lots. There is a stand of trees at the northeast corner and at the intersection of Baldwin Road and Disney Road. The majority of the parcel is cleared. Elevation at the intersection of Baldwin Road and Disney Road is approximately 93 feet. The south/southeast elevations are approximately 8-9 feet. Northeast corner is approximately 52 feet and the southwest corner is approximately 48 feet. Report prepared. February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLAI2-00141/SUB12-00011 Page I of20 • DNR SEPA: No comment received. • DOE—Wetlands, Rick Mraz: No comment received. • Department of Archaeology& Historic Preservation: No comment received. • East Jefferson Fire & Rescue: No comment received. • Port Townsend School District 49: No comment received. • Hoh Indian Tribe: No comment received. • Point No Point Treaty Council: No comment received. • Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe: No comment received. • Quinault Indian Nation: No comment received. • Quileute Nation: No comment received. • Skokomish Tribe: No comment received. • Suquamish Tribe: No comment received. • Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe: No comment received. Staff Findings and Conclusions: 1. The proposal is to subdivide 34.54 acres parcel into three(3)residential lots. 2. The proposed short subdivision is subject to the policies of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. The applicable policies are discussed below. 3. The proposed short subdivision is subject to the requirements of Chapters 18.30 and 18.35 of the Jefferson County Code(JCC). There are several ordinance requirements that apply to the proposed subdivision: Chapter 18.30.30 JCC Water Supplies; Chapter 18.30.040 JCC Sewage Disposal; Chapter 18.30.080 and 090 JCC Roads; Chapter 18.35 Article IV JCC Short Subdivisions. The applicable criteria and requirements are discussed below. 4. The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Rural Residential Land Use Policy LNP 3.3 states: "Rural residential densities shown on the Land Use Map shall be designated by three (3) residential land use densities: one dwelling unit per five(5) acres, one dwelling unit per ten (10) acres, and one dwelling unit per twenty (20) acres in size and subject to the following criteria: LNP 3.3.2: A rural residential land use designation of one dwelling unit per 10 acres (RR 1:10)shall be assigned to those areas throughout the County with: a. an established pattern of the same or similar sized parcels (i.e., 10 acres); b. parcels along the coastal area of similar size; c. areas serving as a"transition" adjacent to Urban Growth Areas; and, d. critical area land parcels. The parcel is a legal conforming lot consisting of 34.54 acres and zoned RR 1:10. There are a variety of parcel sizes ranging from 68.43-acres that is owned by the State Park and Recreation to 9 and 5-acre parcels to tracts that are just over an acre in size. Baldwin Road runs parallel to the western boundary and Disney Road runs parallel to the northern property boundary while the shoreline of Admiralty Inlet was parallel to the southeast property line. Approval of this Report prepared:February I I,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA 12-00141/SUB I2-0001 I Page 3 of 20 "Encourage development and land use proposals that utilize existing transportation systems and provide non-motorized transportation opportunities." Baldwin Road runs parallel to the western property boundary and Disney Road runs parallel to the northern property boundary. Proposed Lot 1 has direct access from Baldwin Road and proposed Lots 2 and 3 will have direct access from Disney Road. According to the Transportation section in the Comprehensive Plan, a future bike route is proposed on SR 116 (Flagler Road). Provision of a second access to the site from the public road system is not necessary. 7. Chapter 18.30.030 JCC Water Supplies: "When the development or redevelopment of land requires the availability of a supply of potable water as determined by the Administrator, potable water shall be delivered by a means approved by the Washington Department of Health and/or Jefferson County Health and Human Services." There are two existing wells that serve the two parcels within this short plat. All existing wells g p P g must be labeled "not approved for potable water supply" and state the intended use of the wells. If the wells are unusable (as defined by WAC 173-160-381) they shall be decommissioned in accordance with WAC 173-160-381 and comply with Jefferson County Health Department Policy Statement 96-02. The wells shall be labeled with the unique ID number or well tag, if available. Water meters and water lines to serve each parcel must be installed to meet the requirements per JCC 18.35.130(1)(b). The water meters and water line locations as installed shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final mylar. 8. Chapter 18.30.040 Sewage Disposal: "All development shall be provided with an individual, on-site septic system and drainfield approved by the Jefferson County Health Department in compliance with Chapter 8.15 JCC, unless the Jefferson County Health Department determines that public sewer is available which would then require connection to the approved public sewer." There are two existing septic permits on the subject parcel; SEP03-64 which is for a reserve drainfield for the southern house of Lot 1 and SEP03-63 is for an EES also on Lot 1 that serves the northern most home. Each septic system requires an 0 & M inspection prior to final plat approval. A site visit of the soil logs for Lots 2 & 3 indicates that there are suitable soils on site for an on-site septic system. Soil logs and their applicable soil log number shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final mylar. 9. Chapter 18.30.080 JCC Roads: 'Roads providing access to or within the subdivision shall be constructed to the standards of Report prepared: February 11.2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA 1 2-001 4 1/SUB 12-0001 1 Page 5 of 20 10. Chapter 18.30.080(1)m JCC Roads: "Easements for private roads providing access to and/or internal circulation within subdivisions shall be 60 feet in width. Easement width may be reduced on the recommendation of the Department of Public Works based on a finding that the public health, safety, and welfare will be protected and that the easement width is adequate for the construction and maintenance of roads and utilities. Where reduced access easement widths are proposed, parallel utilities easements may be required." Access to Proposed Lot 1 is from Baldwin Road which has been constructed with a 16 foot width for a distance of 1, 056 feet. There is an additional +/-2 foot wide grassed shoulders on each side. There is a 15 foot wide right-of-way on the subject parcel that was obtained in 1935; it extends 600 feet south from E. Marrowstone Road to the access to the original residence on Lot 1. There is not right-of-way for Baldwin Road on the proposal site beyond this point. There is a 30 foot wide right-of-way on the adjoining parcels to the west in Section 8 that was obtained in 1959; it extends +/-1,284 feet from E. Marrowstone Road to the south line of Section 8. This right-of-way provides access to 6 parcels that were subsequently created by short plats. Access to Proposed Lots 2 & 3 is via Disney Road, a private road on a 20 foot wide easement that serves 14 existing parcels. It's 419 feet from E. Marrowstone Road to the boundary of Lot 3 and approximately 660 feet to the point where Disney Road crosses a drainage ditch. Physical access to Lot 3 would most likely occur beyond this second point. Disney Road at the E. Marrowstone Road intersection is 18 feet wide. The initial +/-450 foot segment of Disney Road which extends to Lot 3 is 12 feet wide. Beyond this point there is an additional 6 foot to 8 foot wide grassed shoulder on the southerly side which allows vehicles to pass by driving on the shoulder. There is adequate visibility to see from the E. Marrowstone Road intersection to Lot 3. The segment of Disney Road that serves Lots 2 and 3 is adequate to serve the proposed two additional lots. The Public Works Department does not require additional dedication of rights-of-ways for either Baldwin Road or Disney Road. 11. Chapter 18.30.080(1)n JCC Roads: "Access easements from the County Road system to the subdivision shall be provided consistent with the requirements of this Code. Access from the public road system shall be depicted on the final plat." Baldwin Road, Disney Road, and East Marrowstone Road shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final plat. All easements of records shall be graphically portrayed on the final plat with the Auditor's File Number(AFN) of the easements also reference on the face of the plat. 12. Chapter 18.30.080(1)p JCC Roads: "Subdivisions shall establish an agreement for the continuing maintenance of private roads Report prepared: February 11.2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLAI2-00141/SUB12-0001 I Page 7 of 20 district. There is no probable significant adverse environmental impact. The public interest would be served by the division of the 34.54-acre parcel into three lots intended for recreational/residential use. Report prepared: February 11.2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA 12-00141/SUB 12-0001 I Page 9 of 20 11. Resolve the issue of the location of the reserved drainfield site for the northern most home permitted under SEP03-00063. Requires one of the following: • Make application to re-designate the reserve drainfield area; septic designer required, or • Adjust the proposed property line.. 12. Show the reserve drainfield area for the southern most home permitted under SEP03- 00064. 13. Each septic system must have a current Operation& Maintenance inspection. 14. All existing wells must be labeled "not approved for potable water supply" and state the intended use of the wells. If the wells are unusable (as defined by WAC 173-160-381) they shall be decommissioned in accordance with WAC173-160-381 and comply with Jefferson County Health Department Policy Statement 96-02. 15. Label the wells with the unique ID number on the well tag, if available. 16. Water meters and water lines to serve each parcel shall be installed to meet the requirements of Jefferson County Code (JCC) 18.35.130(1)(b). The meters and/or water line locations as installed shall be graphically depicted on the face of the final mylar. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION: 17. Based on requirements of Chapter 18.35 JCC Final Short Plat, the final mylar shall be prepared in accordance with the final short plat checklist. A copy of Chapter 18.35 JCC is attached. 18. An accurate vicinity map shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final plat. 19. The final blue line shall depict the name of the subdivision and the county assigned number of SUB 12-00011/MLA 12-00141 on all sheets of the mylar. 20. The distance of 1302.32 shown on the north line of the proposed short plat does not include the road. However, the dashed line showing the beginning and the ending points of the distance indicates that it does include the road. 21. All existing structures shall be accurately labeled as to their current use. 22. Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48 RCW, Water Pollution Control and WAC 173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, and is subject to enforcement action. 23. Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent stormwater runoff from carrying soil and other pollutants into surface water or storm drains that lead to waters of the state. Sand, silt, clay particles, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered to be pollutants. 24. During construction, all releases of oils, hydraulic fluids, fuels, other petroleum products, paints, solvents, and other deleterious materials must be contained and removed in a manner that will prevent their discharge to waters and soils of the state. Cleanup of spills should take precedence over other work on the site. 25. Clearing limits and/or any easements or required buffers shall be identified and marked in the field prior to the start of any clearing, grading, or construction. Some suggested methods are staking and flagging or high visibility fencing. Report prepared:February 11,2013 MauneyfRogerson Short Plat MLA12-00141/SUB12-00011 Page I I of20 35. Certificates for the Board of County Commissioners, Clerk of the Board, Director of the Department of Public Works, Department of Community Development Administrator and Environmental Health Department need to be added. 36. Utilities and transportation facilities should be installed in the same rights-of-way when the effect will be to reduce the adverse impacts on the physical environment. 37. The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": • Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire safety, health or sanitary hazard. • Not more than 2 unlicensed vehicles shall be stored on any lot unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept,and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC. Outdoor storage of 3 or more junk motor vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk(or salvage)yard and allowed as a permitted use in Table 3-1 or Chapter 18.18 JCC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of JCC 18.20.100, Automobile wrecking yards and junk(or salvage) yards. In no case, shall any such junk motor vehicles be stored in a critical area. 38 The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": • Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed ' P� g twenty feet(20') in height tY ( ) g from the finished grade excepting when such lighting is an integral part of building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. • Exterior lighting shall be energy efficient and shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflections are contained within the boundaries of the parcel. • Exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights-of-way. No lighting shall blink, flash, or be of unusually high intensity or brightness. • All lighting fixtures shall be appropriate in scale, intensity, and height to the use they are serving. 39. The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": • Maximum building height shall not exceed 35 feet. • Maximum impervious surface coverage shall not exceed 25%. • Minimum setbacks from Baldwin Road and Disney Road rights-of-ways shall be 20 feet. Minimum side yard setbacks shall be 5 feet. 40. The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under "Notice to Potential Purchasers": Report prepared: February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA12-00141/SUB12-00011 Page 13 of20 Chapter 18.35.120 JCC Preliminary short plat contents. (1) A preliminary short plat shall be submitted on one or more sheets and shall provide the information described below. All specifications for required improvements shall conform to the development standards contained in Chapter 18.30 JCC. (a) The name of the proposed subdivisions together with the words "Preliminary Short Plat"; (b) The name and address of the applicant; (c) The name, address, stamp and signature of the professional engineer or professional land surveyor who prepared the preliminary plat; (d) Numeric scale (50 feet or fewer to the inch), graphic scale, true north point, and date of preparation; (e) Identification of all land intended to be cleared, and the location of the proposed access to the site for clearing and grading during site development or construction; and (f) A form for the endorsement of the administrator, as follows: APPROVED BY JEFFERSON COUNTY Department of Community Date Development Administrator (2) The preliminary plat shall contain a vicinity sketch sufficient to define the location and boundaries of the proposed subdivision with respect to surrounding property, roads, and other major constructed and natural features. (3) Except as otherwise specified in this chapter, the preliminary short plat shall contain the following existing geographic features, drawn lightly in relation to proposed geographic features: (a) The boundaries of the property to be subdivided, and the boundaries of any adjacent property under the same ownership as the land to be subdivided, to be indicated by bold lines; (b) The names of all adjoining property owners, or names of adjoining developers; (c) All existing property lines lying within the proposed subdivision, including lot lines for lots of record which are to be vacated, and all existing property lines for any property adjacent to the subject property which is under the same ownership as the property to be subdivided (as described in JCC 18.35.110(3)) shall be shown in broken lines; (d) The location, right-of-way widths, pavement widths and names of all existing or platted roads, whether public or private, and other public ways within 200 feet of the property to be divided; (e) The location, widths and purposes of any existing easements lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision; (f) The location, size and invert elevation of sanitary sewer lines and stormwater management facilities lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision or those that will be connected to the subdivision as part of the proposal (if applicable); (g) The location and size of existing water system facilities including all fire hydrants lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision or those which will be connected to as part of the proposed subdivision (if applicable); (h) The location, size and description of any other underground and overhead facilities lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision (if applicable); (i) The location of any environmentally sensitive areas as described in Article VI-D of Chapter 18.15 JCC, including all floodplains lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision; Report prepared: February I I.2013 MauneyRogerson Short Plat MLA12-00141/SUB 12-0001 I Page 15 of 20 (j) The location of existing sections and municipal corporation boundary lines lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision; (k) The location of any well and associated setbacks existing within the proposed subdivision; (I) The location of any individual or on-site sewage disposal system existing within the proposed subdivision; (m) Existing contour lines at intervals of five feet, labeled at intervals not to exceed 20 feet; (n) The location of any existing structures lying within the proposed subdivision; existing structures to be removed shall be indicated by broken lines, and existing structures not to be removed shall be indicated by solid lines. (4) The preliminary P 4 relimina plat shall show the following proposed geographic features: (a) The boundaries in bold solid lines of any proposed lots, tracts or parcels, the area and dimensions of each proposed lot, tract or parcel, and the proposed identifying number or letter to be assigned to each lot, tract or parcel, and block (if applicable); (b) The right-of-way location and width, the proposed name of each road, street or other public way to be created and the estimated tentative grades of such roads; where roadways may exceed the maximum allowable grade or alignment, the director of the department of public works may require sufficient data, including centerline profiles and cross-sections, if necessary, to determine the feasibility of said roadway; (c) The location, width and purpose of each easement to be created; (d) The boundaries, dimensions and area of public and common park and open space areas; (e) Identification of all areas proposed to be dedicated for public use, together with the purpose and any condition of dedication; (f) Proposed final contour lines at intervals of five feet; final contour lines shall be indicated by solid lines; contour lines shall be labeled in intervals not to exceed 20 feet; (g) The building envelope, as defined in JCC 18.10.020, shall be indicated for each lot; (h) Proposed monumentation; (I) Proposed location and description of all individual or community wells, or water system improvements, including fire hydrants (if applicable); (j) Proposed location and description of all sewage disposal improvements, including (if applicable) profiles and all pump stations and their connections to the existing system; (k) Proposed location and description of all stormwater management improvements; (I) Proposed road cross-sections, showing bicycle and pedestrian pathways, trails and sidewalks (if applicable); (m) Proposed type and location of road lighting (if applicable); (n) Proposed type and location of landscaping (if applicable); (o) Proposed location and description of transit stops and shelters (if applicable); (p) Proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs) on development (if applicable). (5) Upon review of an application, the administrator may require additional pertinent information, as deemed necessary, to satisfy any other regulatory requirements. The administrator may also waive specific submittal requirements determined to be unnecessary for review of an application. In such event, the administrator shall document the waiver in the project file or log. [Ord. 11-00 § 7.3(4)] Report prepared: February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA12-00141/SUBi2-00011 Page 16of20 Chapter 18.35.190 JCC Accompanying documents — Final short plat. (1) In cases where any restrictive deed covenants or CC&Rs will apply to lots or parcels within a subdivision, a type written copy of such covenants, bearing all necessary signatures, shall be submitted along with the final plat. Where the recordation of specific deed restrictions or CC&R provisions have been required as a condition of preliminary plat approval, the administrator shall approve and sign the deed restriction or CC&Rs prior to final plat approval. (2) The final plat shall be accompanied by a current (i.e., within 30 days) title company certification of the following: (a) The legal description of the total parcel sought to be subdivided; (b) Those individuals or corporations holding an ownership interest and any security interest (such as deeds or trust or mortgages) or any other encumbrances affecting the title of said parcel. Such individuals or corporations shall sign and approve the final plat prior to final approval; (c) Any lands to be dedicated shall be confirmed as being owned in fee title by the owner(s) signing the dedication certificate; (d) Any easements or restrictions affecting the property to be subdivided with a description of purpose and referenced by the auditor's file number and/or recording number; and (e) If lands are to be dedicated or conveyed to the county as part of the subdivision, an American Land Title Association (A.L.T.A.) policy may be required by the director of the department of public works. (3) All maintenance, performance and guarantee bonds or other guarantees as may be required by the director of the department of public works and the approved improvement method report to guarantee the acceptability and/or performance of all required improvements. [Ord. 11-00 § 7.3(11)] Report prepared: February 11.2013 Maunev/Rogerson Short Plat MLA 12-00141!SUB I2-0001 I Page 17 of 20 Chapter 18.35.370 JCC Preparation of a final long plat. The final long plat shall be prepared in accordance with the following requirements: (1) The final plat shall be prepared by a land surveyor licensed by the state of Washington or a Washington state licensed engineer. (2) Six paper copies of the final long plat shall be submitted, measuring 18 inches by 24 inches in size, allowing one-half inch for border. (3) A final long plat shall contain the following information: (a) The name of the subdivision; (b) Legal description of the property being subdivided; (c) Numeric scale, graphic scale, true north point and date of preparation of the final plat; (d) The lot line of the plat, referenced to county (USC&GS) datum and based on an accurate traverse, with angular and linear dimensions and bearings; (e) The exact location, width and name of all roads, streets, alleys and other public ways within and adjacent to the subdivision; (f) The exact location, width and purpose of all easements and dedications for rights-of- way provided for public and private services and utilities; (g) True courses and distances to the nearest established road lines, or sections or quarter section corner monuments which shall accurately locate the subdivision; (h) Section lines accurately tied to the lines of the plat by distances and courses; (I) All lot and block numbers (if applicable) and lines, with accurate dimensions in feet and hundredths of feet; (i) All house address numbers as assigned by the county; (k) Delineation of the building envelope of each lot; (I) The radii, internal angles, points of curvature, tangent bearings and lengths of arc; (m) The accurate location of each permanent control monument; (n) All plat meander lines or reference lines along bodies of water shall be established as above, but not farther than 20 feet from the high water line of such body; (o) Accurate outlines and legal descriptions of any areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose of such dedication or reservation and any limitations indicated thereon and in dedication; (p) Accurate outlines of any area to be reserved by the deed covenant for common use of owners of property within the subdivision, together with the purposes of such reservation; (q) Any restrictions or conditions on the lots or tracts within the subdivision, as required by the county or at the discretion of the property owner, including but not limited to environmentally sensitive areas buffers; (r) The auditor's file number of all documents and conveyances recorded with the Jefferson County auditor associated with preliminary or final plat approval; (s) The name and seal of the Washington State licensed land surveyor or Washington State licensed engineer responsible preparation of the final plat, and a signed certification on the plat by said surveyor to the effect that it is a true and correct representation of the land actually surveyed by him or her, that the existing monuments shown thereon exist as located and that all dimensional and geodetic details are correct; (t) A signed, notarized certification stating that the subdivision has been made with the free consent and in accordance with the desires of the all persons with ownership and/or security interests in the property. If the plat includes a dedication, the certificate or a separate written instrument shall contain the dedication of all roads and other areas to the public, any individual or individuals, or to any corporation, public or private, as shown on the plat. Such certificate or instrument shall be signed and acknowledged before a Report prepared: February I I,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA 12-00141/SUB 12-0001 I Page 18 of 20 notary public by all parties having any interest in the land subdivided. The owner shall waive all claims against the county, on behalf of the owner and the owner's successors and assigns, which may be occasioned by the establishment and/or construction of any roads, streets, storm drainage improvements or other improvements; (u) An offer of dedication may include a waiver of right of direct access to any road from any property. Such waiver may be required by the director of the department of public works as a condition of approval. Any dedication, donation or grant as shown on the face of the plat shall be considered as a quit claim deed to the said donee or grantee for use for the purpose intended by the donation or grant; (v) Signature blocks for the appropriate certification of the county auditor, director of the department of public works, director of the public health department, and DCD administrator, as follows: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CERTIFICATE I hereby certify to the best of my knowledge that this final plat is in compliance with the certificate of improvements issued pursuant to the Jefferson County Unified Development Code and is consistent with all applicable county improvement standards and requirements in force on the date of preliminary plat approval, this day of , 20_ Director, Jefferson County Department of Public Works DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR'S CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that on this day of , 20 , that this final plat is in substantial conformance with the preliminary plat and any conditions attached thereto, which preliminary plat was approved by Jefferson County on the day of , 20 Administrator, Jefferson County Community Development Department JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DIRECTOR CERTIFICATE Approved by public health department the on this day of , 20 . Director, Jefferson County Public Health Dept. Report prepared: Februar 11. 2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA12-00141/SU1312-00011 Page 19of20 TREASURER All taxes and/or assessments due are paid in full on this day of 20 Jefferson County Treasurer (w) A form of the approval of the County assessor, as follows: ASSESSOR'S APPROVAL Examined and approved this day of , 20_ Jefferson County Assessor Attest: Deputy Jefferson County Assessor (x) A form for the certificate of the Jefferson County recorder, as follows: RECORDING CERTIFICATE Filed for record at the request of Jefferson County this day of 20 , at minutes past_M., and recorded in Volume of Plats, page Records of Jefferson County, Washington. Jefferson County Recording Number . Manager Superintendent of Records (y) Any additional pertinent information as required at the discretion of the director of the department of public works or the DCD administrator. (4) All signatures or certifications appearing on a final plat shall in be reproducible black ink. [Ord. 11-00 § 7.4(11)] Report prepared. Februar 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA 12-00141/SCB12-0001 I Page 20 of 20 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TYPE II LAND USE PERMIT APPLICANT: MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE LYNNE ROGERSON TRUSTEE 2133 OAK BAY RD 1 PORT HADLOCK WA 98339-9778 DATE ISSUED: February 12, 2013 DATE EXPIRES: February 13,2016 MLA NUMBER: MLA12-00141 PROJECT PLANNER: Michelle Farfan PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Three (3) Lot Short Plat with SEPA: The proposal is to subdivide 34.54-acres into three residential lots. Lot 1 will consist of 13.35-acres, Lot 2 will be 11.15-acres and Lot 3 will be 10.04 acres. Lot 1 has an existing single family residence and several detached out-buildings served by an on-site septic system and two on-site wells. Access to Lot 1 is via Baldwin Road. Lots 2 and 3 are vacant and will be accessed by Disney Road. The parcels are located within the Quimper public water system and Lots 2 & 3 would be served by an on-site septic system. A wetland has been identified on the parcel that spans all 3 of the proposed lots and requires a 60-foot buffer. Development of the lots will occur outside the wetland and its associated buffer. PROJECT LOCATION: Parcel number 921 094 026, Lot 1, in Section 9, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM, located on Baldwin Rd, Nordland, WA 98358-9608 CONDITIONS: 1.) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS: All easements of record shall be graphically portrayed on the final plat with the Auditor's File Number(AFN) of the easement(s) also referenced on the face of the plat. 2.) East Marrowstone Road, Baldwin Road and Disney Road shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final mylar. 3.) The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": In order to provide adequate turnaround for fire and emergency vehicles, the initial 30 foot segment of the driveway from Disney Road to the residences on Lots 2 and 3 shall have a minimum 20 foot width with a minimum 6 inches compacted gravel base and 2 inches compacted crushed rock. 4.) The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": Disney Rod is a private road. There is not a road maintenance agreement for Disney Road. 5.) Existing addresses shall be verified for accuracy and consistency with the 911 Emergency Locator System Ordinance and if corrections to addresses are required, they shall be made prior to final plat approval. 6.) Address plates for the lots shall be located in accordance with the provisions of the Jefferson County 911 Emergency Locator System Ordinance. 7.) In accordance with the Jefferson County Fee Schedule Ordinance, the Public Works Department charges an hourly fee for application and plan reviews, project inspections, meetings, hearings, and final review. The proponent shall pay all fees incidental to the proposal prior to final approval. In the event that approval for the proposal is denied by Jefferson County or the proponent does not complete the proposal, the proponent shall still be responsible for paying the Department's fees. The Department's fee is currently 579 per hour. 8.) The proponent shall submit a blue line copy of the site plan and lot closure information prepared by a licensed surveyor to the Department for review. The proponent shall make any corrections or additions prior to final approval. 9.) After all preliminary plat conditions are met; the proponent shall submit a final mylar of the plat to the Department for approval by the Director of Public Works. 10.) HEALTH DEPARTMENT: • The location of the soil test pits and corresponding test pit number shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final plat. 11.) Resolve the issue of the location of the reserved drainfield site for the northern most home permitted under SEP03-00063. Requires one of the following: a. Make application to re-designate the reserve drainfield area; septic designer required, or b. Adjust the proposed property line. 12.) Show the reserve drainfield area for the southern most home permitted under SEP03-00064. 13.) Each septic system must have a current Operation & Maintenance inspection. 14.) All existing wells must be labeled"not approved for potable water supply" and state the intended use of the wells. If the wells are unusable (as defined by WAC 173-160-381) they shall be decommissioned in accordance with WAC173-160-381 and comply with Jefferson County Health Department Policy Statement 96-02. 15.) Label the wells with the unique ID number on the well tag, if available. 16.) Water meters and water lines to serve each parcel shall be installed to meet the requirements of Jefferson County Code (JCC) 18.35.130(1)(b). The meters and/or water line locations as installed shall be graphically depicted on the face of the final mylar. 17.) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION: Based on requirements of Chapter 18.35 JCC Final Short Plat, the final mylar shall be prepared in accordance with the final short plat checklist. A copy of Chapter 18.35 JCC is attached. 18.) An accurate vicinity map shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final plat. 19.) The final blue line shall depict the name of the subdivision and the county assigned number of SUB12-00011/MLA12-00141 on all sheets of the mylar. 20.) The distance of 1302.32 shown on the north line of the proposed short plat does not include the road. However, the dashed line showing the beginning and the ending points of the distance indicates that it does include the road. 21.) All existing structures shall be accurately labeled as to their current use. 22.) Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48 RCW, Water Pollution Control and WAC 173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, and is subject to enforcement action. 23.) Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent stormwater runoff from carrying soil and other pollutants into surface water or storm drains that lead to waters of the state. Sand, silt, clay particles, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered to be pollutants. 24.) During construction, all releases of oils, hydraulic fluids, fuels, other petroleum products, paints, solvents, and other deleterious materials must be contained and removed in a manner that will prevent their discharge to waters and soils of the state. Cleanup of spills should take precedence over other work on the site. 25.) Clearing limits and/or any easements or required buffers shall be identified and marked in the field prior to the start of any clearing, grading, or construction. Some suggested methods are staking and flagging or high visibility fencing. 26.) A permanent vegetative cover shall be established on denuded areas at final grade if they are not otherwise permanently stabilized. 27.) Properties adjacent to the site of a land disturbance shall be protected from sediment deposition through the use of buffers or other perimeter controls, such as filter fence or sediment basins. 28.) All temporary erosion control systems shall be designed to contain the runoff from the developed two year, 24-hour design storm without eroding. 29.) Provision shall be made to minimize the tracking of sediment by construction vehicles onto paved public roads. If sediment is deposited, it should be cleaned every day by shoveling or sweeping. Water cleaning should only be done after the area has been shoveled or swept. 30.) Wash water from paint and wall finishing equipment shall be disposed of in a way which will not adversely impact waters of the state. Untreated disposal of this wastewater is a violation of State Water Quality laws and statutes and, as such, would be subject to enforcement action. 31.) This project may require a construction stormwater permit(also known as National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and State Waste Discharge General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction). This permit is required for projects which meet both of the following conditions: a. One or more acres of soil surface area will be disturbed by construction activities. b. The site already has off-site discharge to waters of the state or storm drains or will have off-site discharge • during construction. An application with instructions can be downloaded from Ecology's website at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/stormwater/construction/ -Application. Construction site operators must apply for a permit at least 60 days prior to discharging stormwater. 32.) A minimum 60 foot wetland buffer width shall be applied to the Category III wetland. Wetland buffer widths shall be measured along a horizontal line perpendicular to the wetland boundary. The buffer shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final mylar. 33.) The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": Wetland buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. A permanent physical separation along the upland boundary of the wetland buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Wetland buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred (100) feet, whichever is less. Signs shall be in place prior to and during construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Buffer- Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." All construction activities shall not encroach upon the wetland buffers. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. Lighting from any source shall be directed away from the wetland buffers. 34.) An updated plat certificate or supplement shall be submitted with the final blueline and shall be 30 days current. 35.) Certificates for the Board of County Commissioners, Clerk of the Board, Director of the Department of Public Works, Department of Community Development Administrator and Environmental Health Department need to be added. 36.) Utilities and transportation facilities should be installed in the same rights-of-way when the effect will be to reduce the adverse impacts on the physical environment. 37.) The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire safety, health or sanitary hazard. Not more than 2 unlicensed vehicles shall be stored on any lot unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC. Outdoor storage of 3 or more junk motor vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk(or salvage) yard and allowed as a permitted use in Table 3-1 or Chapter 18.18 JCC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of JCC 18.20.100, Automobile wrecking yards and junk(or salvage)yards. In no case, shall any such junk motor vehicles be stored in a critical area. 38.) The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet(20') in height from the finished grade excepting when such lighting is an integral part of building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. Exterior lighting shall be energy efficient and shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflections are contained within the boundaries of the parcel. Exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights-of-way. No lighting shall blink, flash, or be of unusually high intensity or brightness. All lighting fixtures shall be appropriate in scale, intensity, and height to the use they are serving. 39.) The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": Maximum building height shall not exceed 35 feet. Maximum impervious surface coverage shall not exceed 25%. Minimum setbacks from Baldwin Road and Disney Road rights-of-ways shall be 20 feet. Minimum side yard setbacks shall be 5 feet. 40.) The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": Any further subdivision of the lots within this plat will be subject to the densities permitted in the Jefferson County Ordinances and Codes in effect at time of such application. These lots may or may not be further subdivided in the future. Approval of this subdivision does not constitute approval of building or sewage disposal permits on each lot. Permit approval will be subject to building lot plans, type of use, contours, and soils on individual lots. Permits will be reviewed in accordance with site conditions and regulations existing on the date the permits are applied for. Any removal of or major disturbance of soil within the proposed drainfield areas may create site conditions that are unacceptable of the installation of sewage disposal systems. 41.) Consistent with RCW 84.56.345, current year and, if applicable, all delinquent property taxes including compensating tax from open space program shall be paid in full prior to the Treasurer signing the mylar and paper copies of the short plat. 42.) The applicant must submit a reproducible copy plus seven (7) paper copies of the proposed final short plat to the Department of Community Development. The proposed final short shall contain elements as described in Chapter 18.35.120 JCC and shall include certifications and other requirements as provided in Chapter 18.35.190 JCC and 18.35.370 JCC. 43.) NOTICE: The sale of lots prior to final short plat approval is unlawful. 44.) EXPIRATION: Preliminary approval will expire on February 12, 2016. The Department of Community Development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of impending preliminary short plat expiration. 45.) SUBMISSION: It is the responsibility of the applicant or authorized representative to ensure the final short plat is submitted in accordance with the conditions of preliminary approval. This includes paying all property taxes and submitting a recording fee for the final plat and supply an updated plat certificate (within 30 days of submittal), all of which is outlined in the final short plat checklist. FINDINGS: 1.) The Administrator finds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code,all other applicable ordinances and regulations, and is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map. APPEALS: Pursuant to RCW 36.70C,the applicant or any aggrieved party may appeal this final decision to the Hearing Examiner within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date of issuance of this land use decision. For more information related to administrative appeals see JCC 18.40.330. � 't �— ALP • (7t 25=, `'7' Ad inistrator / MLA12-00141 \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_IssuePerm it_U.rpt 2/12/2013 Page 4 of 4 Colleen Zmolek From: Stacie Hoskins [shoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 10:41 AM To: #Planning Team Subject: Agenda request procedure Agenda request procedure: 1. Prepare the AR (also includes consent agenda requests) 2. Have internal DCD review and signatures 3. PDF the AR and all attachments 4. Email County Administrator's Office (CAO) staff at CAOstaff@co.jefferson.wa.us • AR in both word and pdf format . • Provide any attachments in pdf format! 7 5. Make copies J • 5 copies of the AR (one each to: DCD director, Planning Mgr, Michelle M (LRP lead), Planner for usage at meeting, and case file) • 14 copies of the attachments 6. Send packet CAO via interoffice or personally deliver if under deadline. This includes: • One original AR—signed . • 9 conies of any attachments 7. Distribute DCD copies of packet: one each to: • DCD director, • Planning Mgr, • Michelle M (LRP lead), • Planner for usage at meeting, and • case file Staece Z. ' oadde4 Planning Manager Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 Fax 360-379-4451 shoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42,56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 1 Chapter 18.35.120 JCC Preliminary short plat contents. (1) A preliminary short plat shall be submitted on one or more sheets and shall provide the information described below. All specifications for required improvements shall conform to the development standards contained in Chapter 18.30 JCC. (a) The name of the proposed subdivisions together with the words "Preliminary Short Plat"; (b) The name and address of the applicant; (c) The name, address, stamp and signature of the professional engineer or professional land surveyor who prepared the preliminary plat; (d) Numeric scale (50 feet or fewer to the inch), graphic scale, true north point, and date of preparation; (e) Identification of all land intended to be cleared, and the location of the proposed access to the site for clearing and grading during site development or construction; and (f) A form for the endorsement of the administrator, as follows: APPROVED BY JEFFERSON COUNTY Department of Community Date Development Administrator (2) The preliminary plat shall contain a vicinity sketch sufficient to define the location and boundaries of the proposed subdivision with respect to surrounding property, roads, and other major constructed and natural features. (3) Except as otherwise specified in this chapter, the preliminary short plat shall contain the following existing geographic features, drawn lightly in relation to proposed geographic features: (a) The boundaries of the property to be subdivided, and the boundaries of any adjacent property under the same ownership as the land to be subdivided, to be indicated by bold lines; (b) The names of all adjoining property owners, or names of adjoining developers; (c) All existing property lines lying within the proposed subdivision, including lot lines for lots of record which are to be vacated, and all existing property lines for any property adjacent to the subject property which is under the same ownership as the property to be subdivided (as described in JCC 18.35.110(3)) shall be shown in broken lines; (d) The location, right-of-way widths, pavement widths and names of all existing or platted roads, whether public or private, and other public ways within 200 feet of the property to be divided; (e) The location, widths and purposes of any existing easements lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision; (f) The location, size and invert elevation of sanitary sewer lines and stormwater management facilities lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision or those that will be connected to the subdivision as part of the proposal (if applicable); (g) The location and size of existing water system facilities including all fire hydrants lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision or those which will be connected to as part of the proposed subdivision (if applicable); (h) The location, size and description of any other underground and overhead facilities lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision (if applicable); (i) The location of any environmentally sensitive areas as described in Article VI-D of Chapter 18.15 JCC, including all floodplains lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision; (j) The location of existing sections and municipal corporation boundary lines lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision; (k) The location of any well and associated setbacks existing within the proposed subdivision; (I) The location of any individual or on-site sewage disposal system existing within the proposed subdivision; (m) Existing contour lines at intervals of five feet, labeled at intervals not to exceed 20 feet; (n) The location of any existing structures lying within the proposed subdivision; existing structures to be removed shall be indicated by broken lines, and existing structures not to be removed shall be indicated by solid lines. (4) The preliminary plat shall show the following proposed geographic features: (a) The boundaries in bold solid lines of any proposed lots, tracts or parcels, the area and dimensions of each proposed lot, tract or parcel, and the proposed identifying number or letter to be assigned to each lot, tract or parcel, and block (if applicable); (b) The right-of-way location and width, the proposed name of each road, street or other public way to be created and the estimated tentative grades of such roads; where roadways may exceed the maximum allowable grade or alignment, the director of the department of public works may require sufficient data, including centerline profiles and cross-sections, if necessary, to determine the feasibility of said roadway; (c) The location, width and purpose of each easement to be created; (d) The boundaries, dimensions and area of public and common park and open space areas; (e) Identification of all areas proposed to be dedicated for public use, together with the purpose and any condition of dedication; (f) Proposed final contour lines at intervals of five feet; final contour lines shall be indicated by solid lines; contour lines shall be labeled in intervals not to exceed 20 feet; (g) The building envelope, as defined in JCC 18.10.020, shall be indicated for each lot; (h) Proposed monumentation; (i) Proposed location and description of all individual or community wells, or water system improvements, including fire hydrants (if applicable); (i) Proposed location and description of all sewage disposal improvements, including (if applicable) profiles and all pump stations and their connections to the existing system; (k) Proposed location and description of all stormwater management improvements; (I) Proposed road cross-sections, showing bicycle and pedestrian pathways, trails and sidewalks (if applicable); (m) Proposed type and location of road lighting (if applicable); (n) Proposed type and location of landscaping (if applicable); (o) Proposed location and description of transit stops and shelters (if applicable); (p) Proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs) on development (if applicable). (5) Upon review of an application, the administrator may require additional pertinent information, as deemed necessary, to satisfy any other regulatory requirements. The administrator may also waive specific submittal requirements determined to be unnecessary for review of an application. In such event, the administrator shall document the waiver in the project file or log. [Ord. 11-00 § 7.3(4)] Chapter 18.35.190 JCC Accompanying documents — Final short plat. (1) In cases where any restrictive deed covenants or CC&Rs will apply to lots or parcels within a subdivision, a type written copy of such covenants, bearing all necessary signatures, shall be submitted along with the final plat. Where the recordation of specific deed restrictions or CC&R provisions have been required as a condition of preliminary plat approval, the administrator shall approve and sign the deed restriction or CC&Rs prior to final plat approval. (2) The final plat shall be accompanied by a current (i.e., within 30 days) title company certification of the following: (a) The legal description of the total parcel sought to be subdivided; (b) Those individuals or corporations holding an ownership interest and any security interest (such as deeds or trust or mortgages) or any other encumbrances affecting the title of said parcel. Such individuals or corporations shall sign and approve the final plat prior to final approval; (c) Any lands to be dedicated shall be confirmed as being owned in fee title by the owner(s) signing the dedication certificate; (d) Any easements or restrictions affecting the property to be subdivided with a description of purpose and referenced by the auditor's file number and/or recording number; and (e) If lands are to be dedicated or conveyed to the county as part of the subdivision, an American Land Title Association (A.L.T.A.) policy may be required by the director of the department of public works. (3) All maintenance, performance and guarantee bonds or other guarantees as may be required by the director of the department of public works and the approved improvement method report to guarantee the acceptability and/or performance of all required improvements. [Ord. 11-00 § 7.3(11)] Chapter 18.35.370 JCC Preparation of a final long plat. The final long plat shall be prepared in accordance with the following requirements: (1) The final plat shall be prepared by a land surveyor licensed by the state of Washington or a Washington state licensed engineer. (2) Six paper copies of the final long plat shall be submitted, measuring 18 inches by 24 inches in size, allowing one-half inch for border. (3) A final long plat shall contain the following information: (a) The name of the subdivision; (b) Legal description of the property being subdivided; (c) Numeric scale, graphic scale, true north point and date of preparation of the final plat; (d) The lot line of the plat, referenced to county (USC&GS) datum and based on an accurate traverse, with angular and linear dimensions and bearings; (e) The exact location, width and name of all roads, streets, alleys and other public ways within and adjacent to the subdivision; (f) The exact location, width and purpose of all easements and dedications for rights-of- way provided for public and private services and utilities; (g) True courses and distances to the nearest established road lines, or sections or quarter section corner monuments which shall accurately locate the subdivision; (h) Section lines accurately tied to the lines of the plat by distances and courses; (i) All lot and block numbers (if applicable) and lines, with accurate dimensions in feet and hundredths of feet; (j) All house address numbers as assigned by the county; (k) Delineation of the building envelope of each lot; (I) The radii, internal angles, points of curvature, tangent bearings and lengths of arc; (m) The accurate location of each permanent control monument; (n) All plat meander lines or reference lines along bodies of water shall be established as above, but not farther than 20 feet from the high water line of such body; (o) Accurate outlines and legal descriptions of any areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose of such dedication or reservation and any limitations indicated thereon and in dedication; (p) Accurate outlines of any area to be reserved by the deed covenant for common use of owners of property within the subdivision, together with the purposes of such reservation; (q) Any restrictions or conditions on the lots or tracts within the subdivision, as required by the county or at the discretion of the property owner, including but not limited to environmentally sensitive areas buffers; (r) The auditor's file number of all documents and conveyances recorded with the Jefferson County auditor associated with preliminary or final plat approval; (s) The name and seal of the Washington State licensed land surveyor or Washington State licensed engineer responsible preparation of the final plat, and a signed certification on the plat by said surveyor to the effect that it is a true and correct representation of the land actually surveyed by him or her, that the existing monuments shown thereon exist as located and that all dimensional and geodetic details are correct; (t) A signed, notarized certification stating that the subdivision has been made with the free consent and in accordance with the desires of the all persons with ownership and/or security interests in the property. If the plat includes a dedication, the certificate or a separate written instrument shall contain the dedication of all roads and other areas to the public, any individual or individuals, or to any corporation, public or private, as shown on the plat. Such certificate or instrument shall be signed and acknowledged before a notary public by all parties having any interest in the land subdivided. The owner shall waive all claims against the county, on behalf of the owner and the owner's successors and assigns, which may be occasioned by the establishment and/or construction of any roads, streets, storm drainage improvements or other improvements; (u) An offer of dedication may include a waiver of right of direct access to any road from any property. Such waiver may be required by the director of the department of public works as a condition of approval. Any dedication, donation or grant as shown on the face of the plat shall be considered as a quit claim deed to the said donee or grantee for use for the purpose intended by the donation or grant; (v) Signature blocks for the appropriate certification of the county auditor, director of the department of public works, director of the public health department, and DCD administrator, as follows: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CERTIFICATE I hereby certify to the best of my knowledge that this final plat is in compliance with the certificate of improvements issued pursuant to the Jefferson County Unified Development Code and is consistent with all applicable county improvement standards and requirements in force on the date of preliminary plat approval, this day of , 20_ Director, Jefferson County Department of Public Works DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR'S CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that on this day of , 20 , that this final plat is in substantial conformance with the preliminary plat and any conditions attached thereto, which preliminary plat was approved by Jefferson County on the day of , 20 Administrator, Jefferson County Community Development Department JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DIRECTOR CERTIFICATE Approved by public health department the on this day of , 20_. Director, Jefferson County Public Health Dept. • TREASURER All taxes and/or assessments due are paid in full on this day of 20 Jefferson County Treasurer w A form of the approval of the County assessor, as follows: ( ) pp Y ASSESSOR'S APPROVAL Examined and approved this day of , 20_ Jefferson County Assessor Attest: Deputy Jefferson County Assessor (x) A form for the certificate of the Jefferson County recorder, as follows: RECORDING CERTIFICATE Filed for record at the request of Jefferson County this day of 20 , at minutes past_M., and recorded in Volume of Plats, page Records of Jefferson County, Washington. Jefferson County Recording Number Manager Superintendent of Records (y) Any additional pertinent information as required at the discretion of the director of the department of public works or the DCD administrator. (4) All signatures or certifications appearing on a final plat shall in be reproducible black ink. [Ord. 11-00 § 7.4(11)] p n Consent Agenda yCr ` JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CONSENT AGENDA REQUEST TO: Board of County Commissioners Port Townsend City Council Philip Morley, County A4 inistrator FROM: Carl Smith, Director Stacie Hoskins, Planning Manager Colleen Zmolek, Associate Planner%efferson County Cia DATE: February 24,2014 SUBJECT: Final Short Plat Approval for Mauney/Rogerson Trust Short Plat MLA12-00141 /SUB12-00011 ATTACHED: 1. Short Plat 2. Administrative Summary Decision 3. Preliminary Short Plat Approval STATEMENT OF ISSUE: Final short plat approval of East Marrowstone Road, Baldwin Road and Disney Road,Nordland. Requesting final approval by the Board per JCC Section 18.35.200 and RCW 58.17.170. Applicants are Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson. BACKGROUND: Staff determined that the application as submitted on June 19, 2012 met said criteria of Jefferson County Code (JCC) Section 18.35.100 in written Findings and Conclusions dated February 12, 2013. Written Findings and Conclusions are required per RCW 58.17.195 which state in part that a county makes a formal written finding of fact that are proposed subdivision or proposed short subdivision is in conformity with applicable zoning ordinance or other land use controls which may exist. Alternatives: The requested action is mandatory per RCW 58.17.170 and Jefferson County Code Section 18.35.130(1)(c). FISCAL IMPACT/COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS: There is no identifiable fiscal impact related to this request for final plat approval. Applicant has paid 2014 full year property taxes in the amount of$18,549.14 RECOMMENDATION: Per Jefferson County Ordinance and Sate Law, the department requests that the Board grant final short plat approval and adopt the written findings and conclusions. REVIEWED BY: Philip Morley, County Administrator Date 1 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY DECISION Marc Mauney&Lynne Rogerson MAUNEY/ROGERSON SHORT PLAT; SUB12-00011/MLA12-00141 Proposal: The proposal is to subdivide 34.54-acres into three residential lots. Lot 1 will consist of 13.35-acres,Lot 2 will be 11.15-acres and Lot 3 will be 10.04 acres. Lot 1 has two existing single family residences, each served by an on- site septic system, and several detached out-buildings and two on-site wells. Access to Lot 1 is via Baldwin Road. Lots 2 and 3 are vacant and will be accessed by Disney Road. The parcels are located within the Quimper public water system and Lots 2 & 3 would be served by an on-site septic system. A wetland has been identified on the parcel that spans all 3 of the proposed lots and requires a 60-foot buffer. Development of the lots will occur outside the wetland and its associated buffer. Property Location: The property is located at 91 Baldwin Road,Nordland; at the intersection of SR 116 and Robbins Road take Robbins Road south and then east to the intersection of Baldwin Road and Disney Road. Parcel is to the east of Baldwin Road and south of Disney Road. Legal Description: APN 921-094-026; Gov't Lot 1 except the right-of-way for a public road granted to Jefferson County over the west 15 feet of the north 660 feet of said Gov't Lot 1 as conveyed by deed recorded under AFN 75494 in Vol. 1 of Road Waivers, Page 548 records of Jefferson County, Washington within Section 9,Township 29 North Range 1 East, WM. Property Description: The parcel slopes to the south/southeast. Disney Road runs parallel to the north property boundary and Baldwin Road runs parallel to the west property boundary. The southeast property boundary runs parallel to the shoreline. Proposed Lot 1 has two existing single family residences, out buildings, two septic systems and two on-site wells. There is a drainage ditch that starts at the middle of Disney Road and runs to the south property line. A category III wetland exists on-site near the shoreline that spans all three proposed lots. There is a stand of trees at the northeast corner and at the intersection of Baldwin Road and Disney Road. The majority of the parcel is cleared. Elevation at the intersection of Baldwin Road and Disney Road is approximately 93 feet. The south/southeast elevations are approximately 8-9 feet. Northeast corner is approximately 52 feet and the southwest corner is approximately 48 feet. Report prepared: February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat Page 1 of 20 MLA 12-00141/SUB 12-00011 Community Plan: The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the site as Rural Residential 1:10. Surrounding Area: The smallest parcel in the vicinity of the proposed subdivision consists of approximately 0.67-acres. There are a variety of parcel sizes ranging from 68.43-acres that is owned by the State Park and Recreation to 9 and 5-acre parcels to tracts that are just over an acre in size. Several of the surround parcels have single family residences and several parcels are undeveloped. Access to surrounding parcels is via Robbins Road, Baldwin Road, Disney Road, East Marrowstone Road, Lip Lip Lane, and private easements. Applicable Goals and Policies: Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Chapter 3, "Rural Residential Land Use Policies",pages 3-47 to 3-49. Chapter 3,"Transportation Policies",page 3-61. Chapter 3, "Rural Character Policies", 3-61 to 3-64. Applicable Ordinances: Ordinance No. 11-1218-00,Jefferson County Code(Title 18) SEPA:The proposed short subdivision is subject to environmental review under WAC 197-11-800 (6)(a); approval of short plats on lands covered by water. Notice Information: Mailed to county agencies and adjacent property owners December 12, 2012. Published in the December 19, 2012 edition of the Jefferson County-Port Townsend Leader. Applicant's representative posted the site on December 18, 2012 per Affidavit of Posting Notice. Testimony: No verbal or written testimony was received on this application. Agency Responses: • County Public Works Department: Written comments dated December 17, 2012 are hereby incorporated by reference. • County Health Department: Written comments dated October 15, 2012 & January 14, 2013 are hereby incorporated by reference. • Jefferson County Assessor's Office: Written comments dated December 14 & 21, 2012 are hereby incorporated by reference. • Department of Ecology: Written comments dated January 2, 2013 are hereby incorporated by reference. • City of Port Townsend Community Development: No comment received. • PUD#1: No comment received. • Jefferson Transit: No comment received. • Port of Port Townsend: No comment received. • WDFW SEPA: No comment received. Report prepared: February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA12-00141/SUB12-00011 Page 2 of 20 • DNR SEPA: No comment received. • DOE—Wetlands, Rick Mraz: No comment received. • Department of Archaeology& Historic Preservation: No comment received. • East Jefferson Fire &Rescue: No comment received. • Port Townsend School District 49: No comment received. • Hoh Indian Tribe: No comment received. • Point No Point Treaty Council: No comment received. • Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe: No comment received. • Quinault Indian Nation: No comment received. • Quileute Nation: No comment received. • Skokomish Tribe: No comment received. • Suquamish Tribe: No comment received. • Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe: No comment received. Staff Findings and Conclusions: 1. The proposal is to subdivide 34.54 acres parcel into three(3) residential lots. 2. The proposed short subdivision is subject to the policies of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. The applicable policies are discussed below. 3. The proposed short subdivision is subject to the requirements of Chapters 18.30 and 18.35 of the Jefferson County Code (JCC). There are several ordinance requirements that apply to the proposed subdivision: Chapter 18.30.30 JCC Water Supplies; Chapter 18.30.040 JCC Sewage Disposal; Chapter 18.30.080 and 090 JCC Roads; Chapter 18.35 Article N JCC Short Subdivisions. The applicable criteria and requirements are discussed below. 4. The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Rural Residential Land Use Policy LNP 3.3 states: "Rural residential densities shown on the Land Use Map shall be designated by three (3) residential land use densities: one dwelling unit per five(5)acres, one dwelling unit per ten (10) acres, and one dwelling unit per twenty (20) acres in size and subject to the following criteria: LNP 3.3.2: A rural residential land use designation of one dwelling unit per 10 acres (RR 1:10)shall be assigned to those areas throughout the County with: a. an established pattern of the same or similar sized parcels (i.e., 10 acres); b. parcels along the coastal area of similar size; c. areas serving as a"transition"adjacent to Urban Growth Areas; and, d. critical area land parcels. The parcel is a legal conforming lot consisting of 34.54 acres and zoned RR 1:10. There are a variety of parcel sizes ranging from 68.43-acres that is owned by the State Park and Recreation to 9 and 5-acre parcels to tracts that are just over an acre in size. Baldwin Road runs parallel to the western boundary and Disney Road runs parallel to the northern property boundary while the shoreline of Admiralty Inlet was parallel to the southeast property line. Approval of this Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA 12-00141/SUB 12-0001 l Page 3 of 20 subdivision request is consistent with the mapped zoning designation of RR 1:10 and the surrounding parcels. To create an additional lot within the county continues to have a sufficient variety of rural densities as it has legislatively created RR 1:5; RR1:10 and RR1:20 zones and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Policy. 5. The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Rural Residential Land Use Policy LNP 14.1 states: "Ensure that land use decisions are based on land use ordinances which are in compliance with the Critical Areas Ordinance and all applicable state and federal environmental laws." Proposed Lot 1 has two existing single family residences,out buildings,two septic permits, and two wells. Proposed Lots 2 & 3 will have its own individual on-site septic systems and will be connected to PUD public water. The entire parcel is located within a SARPA aquifer recharge area. The original house was constructed in the early 1900's and is served by SEP03-63 for designation of a reserve drainfield only. An accessory dwelling unit (ADU) was constructed in 2003 (BLD03-188) and is served by septic permit number SEP03-64. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures at this time. Future permits will be reviewed by the county to assure the greatest protection of the aquifer recharge area. The east one-third of the parcel is located within an "at-risk" SIPZ and the west two-thirds of the parcel is located within a "coastal" SIPZ. The proposed lots are located within the PUD Quimper public water supply area and the water lines and meters will be installed prior to final plat approval and be graphically portrayed on the face of the final mylar. The existing wells will be decommissioned. Therefore, the proposal will not have an impact on the salt water protection zones as identified on the county GIS mapping. The area adjacent to the shoreline is identified as being seismic. Future development will be located landward of the surveyed wetland and its buffer that runs parallel with the shoreline on all three proposed lots. Future development will be located well outside the seismic zone. Building plans will be reviewed for the specific seismic zone and foundations A category III wetland was delineated on the subject parcel that spans all three proposed lots. The wetland will require a 60-foot natural buffer. The final survey mylar will graphically depict the wetland and its buffer. Future permit review will assure that development will occur outside of the wetland and its buffer. The surveyor shall be responsible for surveying the wetland and its associated 60-foot wide buffer and graphically depict it on the face of the final plat. No other critical areas were identified on site. 6. The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Transportation Policy LNP 17.1 states: Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA12-00141/SUB12-00011 Page 4 of20 "Encourage development and land use proposals that utilize existing transportation systems and provide non-motorized transportation opportunities." Baldwin Road runs parallel to the western property boundary and Disney Road runs parallel to the northern property boundary. Proposed Lot 1 has direct access from Baldwin Road and proposed Lots 2 and 3 will have direct access from Disney Road. According to the Transportation section in the Comprehensive Plan, a future bike route is proposed on SR 116 (Flagler Road). Provision of a second access to the site from the public road system is not necessary. 7. Chapter 18.30.030 JCC Water Supplies: "When the development or redevelopment of land requires the availability of a supply of potable water as determined by the Administrator, potable water shall be delivered by a means approved by the Washington Department of Health and/or Jefferson County Health and Human Services." There are two existing wells that serve the two parcels within this short plat. All existing wells must be labeled "not approved for potable water supply" and state the intended use of the wells. If the wells are unusable (as defined by WAC 173-160-381) they shall be decommissioned in accordance with WAC 173-160-381 and comply with Jefferson County Health Department Policy Statement 96-02. The wells shall be labeled with the unique ID number or well tag, if available. Water meters and water lines to serve each parcel must be installed to meet the requirements per JCC 18.35.130(1)(b). The water meters and water line locations as installed shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final mylar. 8. Chapter 18.30.040 Sewage Disposal: "All development shall be provided with an individual, on-site septic system and drainfield approved by the Jefferson County Health Department in compliance with Chapter 8.15 JCC, unless the Jefferson County Health Department determines that public sewer is available which would then require connection to the approved public sewer." There are two existing septic permits on the subject parcel; SEP03-64 which is for a reserve drainfield for the southern house of Lot l and SEP03-63 is for an EES also on Lot 1 that serves the northern most home. Each septic system requires an 0 & M inspection prior to final plat approval. A site visit of the soil logs for Lots 2 & 3 indicates that there are suitable soils on site for an on-site septic system. Soil logs and their applicable soil log number shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final mylar. 9. Chapter 18.30.080 JCC Roads: "Roads providing access to or within the subdivision shall be constructed to the standards of Report prepared:February U.2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA12-00141/SUBI2-00011 Page 5 of20 the Department of Public Works. Public Works road design standards require provision of a 20 foot wide clear zone." Access to Proposed Lot 1 is from Baldwin Road which has been constructed with a 16 foot width for a distance of 1, 056 feet. There is an additional +/-2 foot wide grassed shoulders on each side. There is a 15 foot wide right-of-way on the subject parcel that was obtained in 1935; it extends 600 feet south from E. Marrowstone Road to the access to the original residence on Lot 1. There is not right-of-way for Baldwin Road on the proposal site beyond this point. There is a 30 foot wide right-of-way on the adjoining parcels to the west in Section 8 that was obtained in 1959; it extends +/-1,284 feet from E. Marrowstone Road to the south line of Section 8. This right-of-way provides access to 6 parcels that were subsequently created by short plats. There are two existing residences on Proposed Lot 1. The proposal won't change the use or traffic volume on Baldwin Road which appears to be adequate to accommodate the existing traffic. The dedication of additional right-of-way should not be required. Access to Proposed Lots 2 & 3 is via Disney Road, a private road on a 20 foot wide easement that serves 14 existing parcels. It's 419 feet from E. Marrowstone Road to the boundary of Lot 3 and approximately 660 feet to the point where Disney Road crosses a drainage ditch. Physical access to Lot 3 would most likely occur beyond this second point. Disney Road at the E. Marrowstone Road intersection is 18 feet wide. The initial +/-450 foot segment of Disney Road which extends to Lot 3 is 12 feet wide. Beyond this point there is an additional 6 foot to 8 foot wide grassed shoulder on the southerly side which allows vehicles to pass by driving on the shoulder. There is adequate visibility to see from the E. Marrowstone Road intersection to Lot 3. The segment of Disney Road that serves Lots 2 and 3 is adequate to serve the proposed two additional lots. Due to the configuration of the County Road system, it is not feasible to provide a second access to the site from a County Road. The existing road system is adequate to provide fire and emergency vehicle access and protect public safety. The proposed subdivision would add very small number of vehicles trips to Disney Road. It is adequate to serve the proposal provided that there are turnarounds for fire and emergency vehicles. This can be achieved if the initial 30 foot segment of the driveways from Disney Road to Lots 2 and 3 have a 20 foot width constructed with a minimum compacted thickness of 6 inches gravel base and 2 inches crushed rock. The following notice shall be placed under Notice to Potential Purchasers on the face of the final plat: • In order to provide an adequate turnaround for fire and emergency vehicles, the initial 30 foot segment of the driveway from Disney Road to the residences on Lots 2 and 3 shall have a minimum 20 foot width and a minimum 6 inches compacted gravel base and 2 inches compacted crushed rock. Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA12-00141/SUB12-00011 Page 6 of20 10. Chapter 18.30.080(1)m JCC Roads: "Easements for private roads providing access to and/or internal circulation within subdivisions shall be 60 feet in width. Easement width may be reduced on the recommendation of the Department of Public Works based on a finding that the public health, safety, and welfare will be protected and that the easement width is adequate for the construction and maintenance of roads and utilities. Where reduced access easement widths are proposed,parallel utilities easements may be required." Access to Proposed Lot 1 is from Baldwin Road which has been constructed with a 16 foot width for a distance of 1, 056 feet. There is an additional +/-2 foot wide grassed shoulders on each side. There is a 15 foot wide right-of-way on the subject parcel that was obtained in 1935; it extends 600 feet south from E. Marrowstone Road to the access to the original residence on Lot 1. There is not right-of-way for Baldwin Road on the proposal site beyond this point. There is a 30 foot wide right-of-way on the adjoining parcels to the west in Section 8 that was obtained in 1959; it extends +/-1,284 feet from E. Marrowstone Road to the south line of Section 8. This right-of-way provides access to 6 parcels that were subsequently created by short plats. Access to Proposed Lots 2 & 3 is via Disney Road, a private road on a 20 foot wide easement that serves 14 existing parcels. It's 419 feet from E. Marrowstone Road to the boundary of Lot 3 and approximately 660 feet to the point where Disney Road crosses a drainage ditch. Physical access to Lot 3 would most likely occur beyond this second point. Disney Road at the E. Marrowstone Road intersection is 18 feet wide. The initial +/-450 foot segment of Disney Road which extends to Lot 3 is 12 feet wide. Beyond this point there is an additional 6 foot to 8 foot wide grassed shoulder on the southerly side which allows vehicles to pass by driving on the shoulder. There is adequate visibility to see from the E. Marrowstone Road intersection to Lot 3. The segment of Disney Road that serves Lots 2 and 3 is adequate to serve the proposed two additional lots. The Public Works Department does not require additional dedication of rights-of-ways for either Baldwin Road or Disney Road. 11. Chapter 18.30.080(1)n JCC Roads: "Access easements from the County Road system to the subdivision shall be provided consistent with the requirements of this Code. Access from the public road system shall be depicted on the final plat." Baldwin Road, Disney Road, and East Marrowstone Road shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final plat. All easements of records shall be graphically portrayed on the final plat with the Auditor's File Number(AFN)of the easements also reference on the face of the plat. 12. Chapter 18.30.080(1)p JCC Roads: "Subdivisions shall establish an agreement for the continuing maintenance of private roads Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA 12-00141/SUB 12-00011 Page 7 of 20 either by recording a separate instrument and referencing said instrument on the plat or by declaring a maintenance agreement on the plat. The applicant shall submit the maintenance agreement to the Department of Public Works for review and approval prior to final plat approval." Lots 2 and 3 would be accessed from E. Marrowstone Road by Disney Road, a private road that serves 14 existing parcels. There is not a road maintenance agreement for Disney Road. It would not be equitable to require the owners of Lots 2 and 3 to be responsible for the maintenance of Disney Road in the absence of a requirement for the other property owners to participate. The following notice shall be placed under Notice to Potential Purchasers: • Disney Road is a private road. There is not a road maintenance agreement for Disney Road. 13. Chapter 18.35.130(a) "Short subdivisions shall be given preliminary approval, including preliminary approval subject to conditions, upon finding by the administrator that all of the following have been satisfied: (1) The proposed subdivision conforms to all applicable county, state and federal zoning, land use, environmental and health regulations and plans, including, but not limited to the following: i. The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan: and ii. The provisions of this Code,including any incorporated standards; (2) Utilities and other public services necessary to serve the needs of the proposed subdivision shall be made available, including open spaces, drainage ways, roads, streets and other public ways, potable water, transit facilities, sewage disposal, parks, playgrounds, schools, sidewalks, and other improvements to assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school. (3) Approving the proposed short subdivision will serve the public use and interest and adequate provision has been made for the public health, safety and general welfare. Based on the previous findings, the proposal is found to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 18 of the Jefferson County Code and the Jefferson County Coordinated Water System Plan. Provisions for open spaces, drainage ways, streets/roads, alleys/other public ways, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, and parks and recreation have previously been addressed. The site is not within the vicinity of Jefferson Transit bus routes. The site is within the Chimacum School District. Based on current policy of the school district, students living within the site boundaries would not be required to walk to school. Bus service would be provided under the current policy of the Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Hat MLA 12-00141/SUB 12-00011 Page 8 of 20 • district. There is no probable significant adverse environmental impact. The public interest would be served by the division of the 34.54-acre parcel into three lots intended for recreational/residential use. Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA I2-00141/SUB 12-00011 Page 9 of 20 MAUNEY/ROGERSON SHORT PLAT PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS: 1. All easements of record shall be graphically portrayed on the final plat with the Auditor's File Number(AFN) of the easement(s)also referenced on the face of the plat. 2. East Marrowstone Road,Baldwin Road and Disney Road shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final mylar. 3. The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": • In order to provide adequate turnaround for fire and emergency vehicles,the initial 30 foot segment of the driveway from Disney Road to the residences on Lots 2 and 3 shall have a minimum 20 foot width with a minimum 6 inches compacted gravel base and 2 inches compacted crushed rock. 4. The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": • Disney Rod is a private road. There is not a road maintenance agreement for Disney Road. 5. Existing addresses shall be verified for accuracy and consistency with the 911 Emergency Locator System Ordinance and if corrections to addresses are required, they shall be made prior to final plat approval. 6. Address plates for the lots shall be located in accordance with the provisions of the Jefferson County 911 Emergency Locator System Ordinance. 7. In accordance with the Jefferson County Fee Schedule Ordinance,the Public Works Department charges an hourly fee for application and plan reviews, project inspections, meetings, hearings, and final review. The proponent shall pay all fees incidental to the proposal prior to final approval. In the event that approval for the proposal is denied by Jefferson County or the proponent does not complete the proposal,the proponent shall still be responsible for paying the Department's fees. The Department's fee is currently $79 per hour. 8. The proponent shall submit a blue line copy of the site plan and lot closure information prepared by a licensed surveyor to the Department for review. The proponent shall make any corrections or additions prior to final approval. 9. After all preliminary plat conditions are met; the proponent shall submit a final mylar of the plat to the Department for approval by the Director of Public Works. HEALTH DEPARTMENT: 10. The location of the soil test pits and corresponding test pit number shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final plat. Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat Page 10 of 20 MLA 12-00141/SUB 12-0001 I 11. Resolve the issue of the location of the reserved drainfield site for the northern most home permitted under SEP03-00063. Requires one of the following: • Make application to re-designate the reserve drainfield area; septic designer required, or • Adjust the proposed property line. 12. Show the reserve drainfield area for the southern most home permitted under SEP03- 00064. 13. Each septic system must have a current Operation & Maintenance inspection. 14. All existing wells must be labeled "not approved for potable water supply" and state the intended use of the wells. If the wells are unusable (as defined by WAC 173-160-381) they shall be decommissioned in accordance with WAC173-160-381 and comply with Jefferson County Health Department Policy Statement 96-02. 15. Label the wells with the unique ID number on the well tag, if available. 16. Water meters and water lines to serve each parcel shall be installed to meet the requirements of Jefferson County Code (JCC) 18.35.130(1)(b). The meters and/or water line locations as installed shall be graphically depicted on the face of the final mylar. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION: 17. Based on requirements of Chapter 18.35 JCC Final Short Plat, the final mylar shall be prepared in accordance with the final short plat checklist. A copy of Chapter 18.35 JCC is attached. 18. An accurate vicinity map shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final plat. 19. The final blue line shall depict the name of the subdivision and the county assigned number of SUB12-00011/MLA12-00141 on all sheets of the mylar. 20. The distance of 1302.32 shown on the north line of the proposed short plat does not include the road. However, the dashed line showing the beginning and the ending points of the distance indicates that it does include the road. 21. All existing structures shall be accurately labeled as to their current use. 22. Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48 RCW, Water Pollution Control and WAC 173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, and is subject to enforcement action. 23. Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent stormwater runoff from carrying soil and other pollutants into surface water or storm drains that lead to waters of the state. Sand, silt, clay particles,and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered to be pollutants. 24. During construction, all releases of oils, hydraulic fluids, fuels, other petroleum products, paints, solvents, and other deleterious materials must be contained and removed in a manner that will prevent their discharge to waters and soils of the state. Cleanup of spills should take precedence over other work on the site. 25. Clearing limits and/or any easements or required buffers shall be identified and marked in the field prior to the start of any clearing, grading, or construction. Some suggested methods are staking and flagging or high visibility fencing. Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA12-00141/SUB12-00011 Page 11 of20 26. A permanent vegetative cover shall be established on denuded areas at final grade if they are not otherwise permanently stabilized. 27. Properties adjacent to the site of a land disturbance shall be protected from sediment deposition through the use of buffers or other perimeter controls, such as filter fence or sediment basins. 28. All temporary erosion control systems shall be designed to contain the runoff from the developed two year, 24-hour design storm without eroding. 29. Provision shall be made to minimize the tracking of sediment by construction vehicles onto paved public roads. If sediment is deposited, it should be cleaned every day by shoveling or sweeping. Water cleaning should only be done after the area has been shoveled or swept. 30. Wash water from paint and wall finishing equipment shall be disposed of in a way which will not adversely impact waters of the state. Untreated disposal of this wastewater is a violation of State Water Quality laws and statutes and, as such, would be subject to enforcement action. 31. This project may require a construction stormwater permit (also known as National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and State Waste Discharge General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction). This permit is required for projects which meet both of the following conditions: a. One or more acres of soil surface area will be disturbed by construction activities. b. The site already has off-site discharge to waters of the state or storm drains or will have off-site discharge during construction. An application with instructions can be downloaded from Ecology's website at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wa/stormwater/construction/ - Application. Construction site operators must apply for a permit at least 60 days prior to discharging stormwater. 32. A minimum 60 foot wetland buffer width shall be applied to the Category III wetland. Wetland buffer widths shall be measured along a horizontal line perpendicular to the wetland boundary. The buffer shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final mylar 33. The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": • Wetland buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. • A permanent physical separation along the upland boundary of the wetland buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. • Wetland buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred (100) feet, whichever is less. Signs shall be in place prior to and during construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Buffer-Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." • All construction activities shall not encroach upon the wetland buffers. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. • Lighting from any source shall be directed away from the wetland buffers. 34. An updated plat certificate or supplement shall be submitted with the final blueline and shall be 30 days current. Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA12-00(41/SUB12-00011 Page 12 of20 35. Certificates for the Board of County Commissioners, Clerk of the Board, Director of the Department of Public Works, Department of Community Development Administrator and Environmental Health Department need to be added. 36. Utilities and transportation facilities should be installed in the same rights-of-way when the effect will be to reduce the adverse impacts on the physical environment. 37. The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": • Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire safety,health or sanitary hazard. • Not more than 2 unlicensed vehicles shall be stored on any lot unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC. Outdoor storage of 3 or more junk motor vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk(or salvage)yard and allowed as a permitted use in Table 3-1 or Chapter 18.18 JCC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of JCC 18.20.100,Automobile wrecking yards and junk(or salvage) yards. In no case, shall any such junk motor vehicles be stored in a critical area. 38 The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": • Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet(20')in height from the finished grade excepting when such lighting is an integral part of building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. • Exterior lighting shall be energy efficient and shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflections are contained within the boundaries of the parcel. • Exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights-of-way. No lighting shall blink, flash,or be of unusually high intensity or brightness. • All lighting fixtures shall be appropriate in scale, intensity, and height to the use they are serving. 39. The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": • Maximum building height shall not exceed 35 feet. • Maximum impervious surface coverage shall not exceed 25%. • Minimum setbacks from Baldwin Road and Disney Road rights-of-ways shall be 20 feet. Minimum side yard setbacks shall be 5 feet. 40. The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under "Notice to Potential Purchasers": Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA12-00141/SUBI2-00011 Page 13 of 20 • Any further subdivision of the lots within this plat will be subject to the densities permitted in the Jefferson County Ordinances and Codes in effect at time of such • application. These lots may or may not be further subdivided in the future. • Approval of this subdivision does not constitute approval of building or sewage disposal permits on each lot. Permit approval will be subject to building lot plans, type of use, contours, and soils on individual lots. Permits will be reviewed in accordance with site conditions and regulations existing on the date the permits are applied for. • Any removal of or major disturbance of soil within the proposed drainfield areas may create site conditions that are unacceptable of the installation of sewage disposal systems. 41. Consistent with RCW 84.56.345, current year and, if applicable, all delinquent property taxes including compensating tax from open space program shall be paid in full prior to the Treasurer signing the mylar and paper copies of the short plat. 42. The applicant must submit a reproducible copy plus seven(7)paper copies of the proposed final short plat to the Department of Community Development. The proposed final short shall contain elements as described in Chapter 18.35.120 JCC and shall include certifications and other requirements as provided in Chapter 18.35.190 JCC and 18.35.370 JCC. NOTICE: The sale of lots prior to final short plat approval is unlawful. EXPIRATION: Preliminary approval will expire on February 12,2016. The Department of Community Development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of impending preliminary short plat expiration. SUBMISSION: It is the responsibility of the applicant or authorized representative to ensure the final short plat is submitted in accordance with the conditions of preliminary approval. This includes paying all property taxes and submitting a recording fee for the final plat and supply an updated plat certificate (within 30 days of submittal), all of which is outlined in the final short plat checklist. Report prepared:February 1 I,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA12-00141/SUBI2-00011 Page 14 of20 Chapter 18.35.120 JCC Preliminary short plat contents. (1) A preliminary short plat shall be submitted on one or more sheets and shall provide the information described below. All specifications for required improvements shall conform to the development standards contained in Chapter 18.30 JCC. (a) The name of the proposed subdivisions together with the words "Preliminary Short Plat"; (b) The name and address of the applicant; (c) The name, address, stamp and signature of the professional engineer or professional land surveyor who prepared the preliminary plat; (d) Numeric scale (50 feet or fewer to the inch), graphic scale, true north point, and date of preparation; (e) Identification of all land intended to be cleared, and the location of the proposed access to the site for clearing and grading during site development or construction; and (f) A form for the endorsement of the administrator, as follows: APPROVED BY JEFFERSON COUNTY Department of Community Date P Y Development Administrator (2) The preliminary plat shall contain a vicinity sketch sufficient to define the location and boundaries of the proposed subdivision with respect to surrounding property, roads, and other major constructed and natural features. (3) Except as otherwise specified in this chapter, the preliminary short plat shall contain the following existing geographic features, drawn lightly in relation to proposed geographic features: (a) The boundaries of the property to be subdivided, and the boundaries of any adjacent property under the same ownership as the land to be subdivided, to be indicated by bold lines; (b) The names of all adjoining property owners, or names of adjoining developers; (c) All existing property lines lying within the proposed subdivision, including lot lines for lots of record which are to be vacated, and all existing property lines for any property adjacent to the subject property which is under the same ownership as the property to be subdivided (as described in JCC 18.35.110(3)) shall be shown in broken lines; (d) The location, right-of-way widths, pavement widths and names of all existing or platted roads, whether public or private, and other public ways within 200 feet of the property to be divided; (e) The location, widths and purposes of any existing easements lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision; (f) The location, size and invert elevation of sanitary sewer lines and stormwater management facilities lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision or those that will be connected to the subdivision as part of the proposal (if applicable); (g) The location and size of existing water system facilities including all fire hydrants lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision or those which will be connected to as part of the proposed subdivision (if applicable); (h) The location, size and description of any other underground and overhead facilities lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision (if applicable); (i) The location of any environmentally sensitive areas as described in Article VI-D of Chapter 18.15 JCC, including all floodplains lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision; Report prepared: February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA12-00141/SUBI2-00011 Page 15 of20 - I (j) The location of existing sections and municipal corporation boundary lines lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision; (k) The location of any well and associated setbacks existing within the proposed subdivision; (I) The location of any individual or on-site sewage disposal system existing within the proposed subdivision; (m) Existing contour lines at intervals of five feet, labeled at intervals not to exceed 20 feet; (n) The location of any existing structures lying within the proposed subdivision; existing structures to be removed shall be indicated by broken lines, and existing structures not to be removed shall be indicated by solid lines. (4) The preliminary plat shall show the following proposed geographic features: (a) The boundaries in bold solid lines of any proposed lots, tracts or parcels, the area and dimensions of each proposed lot, tract or parcel, and the proposed identifying number or letter to be assigned to each lot, tract or parcel, and block (if applicable); (b) The right-of-way location and width, the proposed name of each road, street or other public way to be created and the estimated tentative grades of such roads; where roadways may exceed the maximum allowable grade or alignment, the director of the department of public works may require sufficient data, including centerline profiles and cross-sections, if necessary, to determine the feasibility of said roadway; (c) The location, width and purpose of each easement to be created; (d) The boundaries, dimensions and area of public and common park and open space areas; (e) Identification of all areas proposed to be dedicated for public use, together with the purpose and any condition of dedication; (f) Proposed final contour lines at intervals of five feet; final contour lines shall be indicated by solid lines; contour lines shall be labeled in intervals not to exceed 20 feet; (g) The building envelope, as defined in JCC 18.10.020, shall be indicated for each lot; (h) Proposed monumentation; (I) Proposed location and description of all individual or community wells, or water system improvements, including fire hydrants (if applicable); (I) Proposed location and description of all sewage disposal improvements, including (if applicable) profiles and all pump stations and their connections to the existing system; (k) Proposed location and description of all stormwater management improvements; (I) Proposed road cross-sections, showing bicycle and pedestrian pathways, trails and sidewalks (if applicable); (m) Proposed type and location of road lighting (if applicable); (n) Proposed type and location of landscaping (if applicable); (o) Proposed location and description of transit stops and shelters (if applicable); (p) Proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs) on development (if applicable). (5) Upon review of an application, the administrator may require additional pertinent information, as deemed necessary, to satisfy any other regulatory requirements. The administrator may also waive specific submittal requirements determined to be unnecessary for review of an application. In such event, the administrator shall document the waiver in the project file or log. [Ord. 11-00 § 7.3(4)] Report prepared: February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA 12-00141/SUB 12-0001 1 Page 16 of 20 Chapter 18.35.190 JCC Accompanying documents — Final short plat. (1) In cases where any restrictive deed covenants or CC&Rs will apply to lots or parcels within a subdivision, a type written copy of such covenants, bearing all necessary signatures, shall be submitted along with the final plat. Where the recordation of specific deed restrictions or CC&R provisions have been required as a condition of preliminary plat approval, the administrator shall approve and sign the deed restriction or CC&Rs prior to final plat approval. (2) The final plat shall be accompanied by a current (i.e., within 30 days) title company certification of the following: (a) The legal description of the total parcel sought to be subdivided; (b) Those individuals or corporations holding an ownership interest and any security interest (such as deeds or trust or mortgages) or any other encumbrances affecting the title of said parcel. Such individuals or corporations shall sign and approve the final plat prior to final approval; (c) Any lands to be dedicated shall be confirmed as being owned in fee title by the owner(s) signing the dedication certificate; (d) Any easements or restrictions affecting the property to be subdivided with a description of purpose and referenced by the auditor's file number and/or recording number; and (e) If lands are to be dedicated or conveyed to the county as part of the subdivision, an American Land Title Association (A.L.T.A.) policy may be required by the director of the department of public works. (3) All maintenance, performance and guarantee bonds or other guarantees as may be required by the director of the department of public works and the approved improvement method report to guarantee the acceptability and/or performance of all required improvements. [Ord. 11-00 § 7.3(11)] Report prepared: February 11, 2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA 12-00141/SUB 12-0001 l Page 17 of 20 Chapter 18.35.370 JCC Preparation of a final long plat. The final long plat shall be prepared in accordance with the following requirements: (1) The final plat shall be prepared by a land surveyor licensed by the state of Washington or a Washington state licensed engineer. (2) Six paper copies of the final long plat shall be submitted, measuring 18 inches by 24 inches in size, allowing one-half inch for border. (3) A final long plat shall contain the following information: (a) The name of the subdivision; (b) Legal description of the property being subdivided; (c) Numeric scale, graphic scale, true north point and date of preparation of the final plat; (d) The lot line of the plat, referenced to county (USC&GS) datum and based on an accurate traverse, with angular and linear dimensions and bearings; (e) The exact location, width and name of all roads, streets, alleys and other public ways within and adjacent to the subdivision; (f) The exact location, width and purpose of all easements and dedications for rights-of- way provided for public and private services and utilities; (g) True courses and distances to the nearest established road lines, or sections or quarter section corner monuments which shall accurately locate the subdivision; (h) Section lines accurately tied to the lines of the plat by distances and courses; (i) All lot and block numbers (if applicable) and lines, with accurate dimensions in feet and hundredths of feet; Q) All house address numbers as assigned by the county; (k) Delineation of the building envelope of each lot; (I) The radii, internal angles, points of curvature, tangent bearings and lengths of arc; (m) The accurate location of each permanent control monument; (n) All plat meander lines or reference lines along bodies of water shall be established as above, but not farther than 20 feet from the high water line of such body; (o) Accurate outlines and legal descriptions of any areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose of such dedication or reservation and any limitations indicated thereon and in dedication; (p) Accurate outlines of any area to be reserved by the deed covenant for common use of owners of property within the subdivision, together with the purposes of such reservation; (q) Any restrictions or conditions on the lots or tracts within the subdivision, as required by the county or at the discretion of the property owner, including but not limited to environmentally sensitive areas buffers; (r) The auditor's file number of all documents and conveyances recorded with the Jefferson County auditor associated with preliminary or final plat approval; (s) The name and seal of the Washington State licensed land surveyor or Washington State licensed engineer responsible preparation of the final plat, and a signed certification on the plat by said surveyor to the effect that it is a true and correct representation of the land actually surveyed by him or her, that the existing monuments shown thereon exist as located and that all dimensional and geodetic details are correct; (t) A signed, notarized certification stating that the subdivision has been made with the free consent and in accordance with the desires of the all persons with ownership and/or security interests in the property. If the plat includes a dedication, the certificate or a separate written instrument shall contain the dedication of all roads and other areas to the public, any individual or individuals, or to any corporation, public or private, as shown on the plat. Such certificate or instrument shall be signed and acknowledged before a Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA12-00141/SUB12-00011 Page 18 of20 notary public by all parties having any interest in the land subdivided. The owner shall waive all claims against the county, on behalf of the owner and the owner's successors and assigns, which may be occasioned by the establishment and/or construction of any roads, streets, storm drainage improvements or other improvements; (u) An offer of dedication may include a waiver of right of direct access to any road from any property. Such waiver may be required by the director of the department of public works as a condition of approval. Any dedication, donation or grant as shown on the face of the plat shall be considered as a quit claim deed to the said donee or grantee for use for the purpose intended by the donation or grant; (v) Signature blocks for the appropriate certification of the county auditor, director of the department of public works, director of the public health department, and DCD administrator, as follows: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CERTIFICATE I hereby certify to the best of my knowledge that this final plat is in compliance with the certificate of improvements issued pursuant to the Jefferson County Unified Development Code and is consistent with all applicable county improvement standards and requirements in force on the date of preliminary plat approval, this day of , 20_ Director, Jefferson County Department of Public Works DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR'S CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that on this day of , 20_, that this final plat is in substantial conformance with the preliminary plat and any conditions attached thereto, which preliminary plat was approved by Jefferson County on the day of , 20 Administrator, Jefferson County Community Development Department JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DIRECTOR CERTIFICATE Approved by public health department the on this day of , 20_ Director, Jefferson County Public Health Dept. Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA 12-00141/SUB 12-0001 1 Page 19 of 20 TREASURER All taxes and/or assessments due are paid in full on this day of 20 Jefferson County Treasurer (w) A form of the approval of the County assessor, as follows: ASSESSOR'S APPROVAL Examined and approved this day of , 20_ Jefferson County Assessor Attest: Deputy Jefferson County Assessor (x) A form for the certificate of the Jefferson County recorder, as follows: RECORDING CERTIFICATE Filed for record at the request of Jefferson County this day of 20 , at minutes past_M., and recorded in Volume of Plats, page Records of Jefferson County, Washington. Jefferson County Recording Number_ Manager Superintendent of Records (y) Any additional pertinent information as required at the discretion of the director of the department of public works or the DCD administrator. (4) All signatures or certifications appearing on a final plat shall in be reproducible black ink. [Ord. 11-00 § 7.4(11)] Report prepared: February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA 12-00141/SUB 12-0001 1 Page 20 of 20 41 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TYPE II LAND USE PERMIT APPLICANT: MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE LYNNE ROGERSON TRUSTEE 2133 OAK BAY RD PORT HADLOCK WA 98339-9778 DATE ISSUED: February 12,2013 DATE EXPIRES: February 13,2016 MLA NUMBER: MLA12-00141 PROJECT PLANNER: Michelle Farfan PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Three (3) Lot Short Plat with SEPA: The proposal is to subdivide 34.54-acres into three residential lots. Lot 1 will consist of 13.35-acres, Lot 2 will be 11.15-acres and Lot 3 will be 10.04 acres. Lot 1 has an existing single family residence and several detached out-buildings served by an on-site septic system and two on-site wells. Access to Lot 1 is via Baldwin Road. Lots 2 and 3 are vacant and will be accessed by Disney Road. The parcels are located within the Quimper public water system and Lots 2 & 3 would be served by an on-site septic system. Awetland has been identified on the parcel that spans all 3 of the proposed lots and requires a 60-foot buffer. Development of the lots will occur outside the wetland and its associated buffer. PROJECT LOCATION: Parcel number 921 094 026, Lot 1, in Section 9, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM, located on Baldwin Rd, Nordland, WA 98358-9608 CONDITIONS: 1.) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS: All easements of record shall be graphically portrayed on the final plat with the Auditor's File Number(AFN) of the easement(s) also referenced on the face of the plat. 2.) East Marrowstone Road, Baldwin Road and Disney Road shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final mylar. 3.) The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": In order to provide adequate turnaround for fire and emergency vehicles, the initial 30 foot segment of the driveway from Disney Road to the residences on Lots 2 and 3 shall have a minimum 20 foot width with a minimum 6 inches compacted gravel base and 2 inches compacted crushed rock. 4.) The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": Disney Rod is a private road. There is not a road maintenance agreement for Disney Road. 5.) Existing addresses shall be verified for accuracy and consistency with the 911 Emergency Locator System Ordinance and if corrections to addresses are required, they shall be made prior to final plat approval. 6.) Address plates for the lots shall be located in accordance with the provisions of the Jefferson County 911 Emergency Locator System Ordinance. 7.) In accordance with the Jefferson County Fee Schedule Ordinance, the Public Works Department charges an hourly fee for application and plan reviews, project inspections, meetings, hearings, and final review. The proponent shall pay all fees incidental to the proposal prior to final approval. In the event that approval for the proposal is denied by Jefferson County or the proponent does not complete the proposal, the proponent shall still be responsible for paying the Department's fees. The Department's fee is currently$79 per hour. 8.) The proponent shall submit a blue line copy of the site plan and lot closure information prepared by a licensed surveyor to the Department for review. The proponent shall make any corrections or additions prior to final approval. 9.) After all preliminary plat conditions are met; the proponent shall submit a final mylar of the plat to the Department for approval by the Director of Public Works. 10.) HEALTH DEPARTMENT: The location of the soil test pits and corresponding test pit number shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final plat. 11.) Resolve the issue of the location of the reserved drainfield site for the northern most home permitted under SEP03-00063. Requires one of the following: a. Make application to re-designate the reserve drainfield area; septic designer required, or b. Adjust the proposed property line. 12.) Show the reserve drainfield area for the southern most home permitted under SEP03-00064. 13.) Each septic system must have a current Operation & Maintenance inspection. 14.) All existing wells must be labeled "not approved for potable water supply" and state the intended use of the wells. If the wells are unusable (as defined by WAC 173-160-381)they shall be decommissioned in accordance with WAC173-160-381 and comply with Jefferson County Health Department Policy Statement 96-02. 15.) Label the wells with the unique ID number on the well tag, if available. 16.) Water meters and water lines to serve each parcel shall be installed to meet the requirements of Jefferson County Code (JCC) 18.35.130(1)(b). The meters and/or water line locations as installed shall be graphically depicted on the face of the final mylar. 17.) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION: Based on requirements of Chapter 18.35 JCC Final Short Plat, the final mylar shall be prepared in accordance with the final short plat checklist. A copy of Chapter 18.35 JCC is attached. 18.) An accurate vicinity map shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final plat. 19.) The final blue line shall depict the name of the subdivision and the county assigned number of SUB12-00011/MLA12-00141 on all sheets of the mylar. 20.) The distance of 1302.32 shown on the north line of the proposed short plat does not include the road. However, the dashed line showing the beginning and the ending points of the distance indicates that it does include the road. 21.) All existing structures shall be accurately labeled as to their current use. 22.) Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48 RCW, Water Pollution Control and WAC 173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, and is subject to enforcement action. 23.) Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent stormwater runoff from carrying soil and other pollutants into surface water or storm drains that lead to waters of the state. Sand, silt, clay particles, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered to be pollutants. 24.) During construction, all releases of oils, hydraulic fluids, fuels, other petroleum products, paints, solvents, and other deleterious materials must be contained and removed in a manner that will prevent their discharge to waters and soils of the state. Cleanup of spills should take precedence over other work on the site. 25.) Clearing limits and/or any easements or required buffers shall be identified and marked in the field prior to the start of any clearing, grading, or construction. Some suggested methods are staking and flagging or high visibility fencing. 26.) A permanent vegetative cover shall be established on denuded areas at final grade if they are not otherwise permanently stabilized. 27.) Properties adjacent to the site of a land disturbance shall be protected from sediment deposition through the use of buffers or other perimeter controls, such as filter fence or sediment basins. 28.) All temporary erosion control systems shall be designed to contain the runoff from the developed two year, 24-hour design storm without eroding. 29.) Provision shall be made to minimize the tracking of sediment by construction vehicles onto paved public roads. If sediment is deposited, it should be cleaned every day by shoveling or sweeping. Water cleaning should only be done after the area has been shoveled or swept. 30.) Wash water from paint and wall finishing equipment shall be disposed of in a way which will not adversely impact waters of the state. Untreated disposal of this wastewater is a violation of State Water Quality laws and statutes and, as such, would be subject to enforcement action. 31.) This project may require a construction stormwater permit(also known as National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and State Waste Discharge General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction). This permit is required for projects which meet both of the following conditions: a. One or more acres of soil surface area will be disturbed by construction activities. b. The site already has off-site discharge to waters of the state or storm drains or will have off-site discharge during construction. An application with instructions can be downloaded from Ecology's website at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/stormwater/construction/-Application. Construction site operators must apply for a permit at least 60 days prior to discharging stormwater. 32.) A minimum 60 foot wetland buffer width shall be applied to the Category III wetland. Wetland buffer widths shall be measured along a horizontal line perpendicular to the wetland boundary. The buffer shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final mylar. 33.) The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": Wetland buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. A permanent physical separation along the upland boundary of the wetland buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Wetland buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred (100)feet, whichever is less. Signs shall be in place prior to and during construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Buffer- Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." All construction activities shall not encroach upon the wetland buffers. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. Lighting from any source shall be directed away from the wetland buffers. 34.) An updated plat certificate or supplement shall be submitted with the final blueline and shall be 30 days current. 35.) Certificates for the Board of County Commissioners, Clerk of the Board, Director of the Department of Public Works, Department of Community Development Administrator and Environmental Health Department need to be added. 36.) Utilities and transportation facilities should be installed in the same rights-of-way when the effect will be to reduce the adverse impacts on the physical environment. 37.) The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire safety, health or sanitary hazard. Not more than 2 unlicensed vehicles shall be stored on any lot unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC. Outdoor storage of 3 or more junk motor vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk(or salvage) yard and allowed as a permitted use in Table 3-1 or Chapter 18.18 JCC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of JCC 18.20.100, Automobile wrecking yards and junk (or salvage)yards. In no case, shall any such junk motor vehicles be stored in a critical area. 38.) The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet(20') in height from the finished grade excepting when such lighting is an integral part of building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. Exterior lighting shall be energy efficient and shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflections are contained within the boundaries of the parcel. Exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights-of-way. No lighting shall blink, flash, or be of unusually high intensity or brightness. All lighting fixtures shall be appropriate in scale, intensity, and height to the use they are serving. 39.) The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": Maximum building height shall not exceed 35 feet. Maximum impervious surface coverage shall not exceed 25%. Minimum setbacks from Baldwin Road and Disney Road rights-of-ways shall be 20 feet. Minimum side yard setbacks shall be 5 feet. 40.) The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": Any further subdivision of the lots within this plat will be subject to the densities permitted in the Jefferson County Ordinances and Codes in effect at time of such application. These lots may or may not be further subdivided in the future. Approval of this subdivision does not constitute approval of building or sewage disposal permits on each lot. Permit approval will be subject to building lot plans, type of use, contours, and soils on individual lots. Permits will be reviewed in accordance with site conditions and regulations existing on the date the permits are applied for. Any removal of or major disturbance of soil within the proposed drainfield areas may create site conditions that are unacceptable of the installation of sewage disposal systems. 41.) Consistent with RCW 84.56.345, current year and, if applicable, all delinquent property taxes including compensating tax from open space program shall be paid in full prior to the Treasurer signing the mylar and paper copies of the short plat. 42.) The applicant must submit a reproducible copy plus seven (7) paper copies of the proposed final short plat to the Department of Community Development. The proposed final short shall contain elements as described in Chapter 18.35.120 JCC and shall include certifications and other requirements as provided in Chapter 18.35.190 JCC and 18.35.370 JCC. 43.) NOTICE: The sale of lots prior to final short plat approval is unlawful. 44.) EXPIRATION: Preliminary approval will expire on February 12, 2016. The Department of Community Development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of impending preliminary short plat expiration. 45.) SUBMISSION: It is the responsibility of the applicant or authorized representative to ensure the final short plat is submitted in accordance with the conditions of preliminary approval. This includes paying all property taxes and submitting a recording fee for the final plat and supply an updated plat certificate (within 30 days of submittal), all of which is outlined in the final short plat checklist. FINDINGS: 1.) The Administrator finds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code, all other applicable ordinances and regulations, and is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map. APPEALS: Pursuant to RCW 36.70C,the applicant or any aggrieved party may appeal this final decision to the Hearing Examiner within fourteen(14) calendar days of the date of issuance of this land use decision. For more information related to administrative appeals see JCC 18.40.330. 2sz›13 1W• Ad inistrator MLA12-00141 \\tidemark\data\forms\F MLT_ISSUePermit_U.rpt 2/12/2013 Page 4 of 4 Colleen Zmolek From: Stacie Hoskins [shoskins @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 10:41 AM To: #Planning Team Subject: Agenda request procedure Agenda request procedure: 1. Prepare the AR (also includes consent agenda requests) 2. Have internal DCD review and signatures 3. PDF the AR and all attachments 4. Email County Administrator's Office (CAO) staff at CAOstaff@co.iefferson.wa.us • AR in both word and pdf format . M • Provide any attachments in pdf format 5. Make copies • 5 copies of the AR (one each to: DCD director, Planning Mgr, Michelle M (LRP lead), Planner for usage at meeting, and case file) 4 • 14 copies of the attachments 6. Send packet CAO via interoffice or personally deliver if under deadline. This includes: • One original AR—signed . • 9 conies of any attachments 7. Distribute DCD copies of packet: one each to: • DCD director, • Planning Mgr, • Michelle M (LRP lead), • Planner for usage at meeting, and • case file Stacie 4. qcv. Planning Manager Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 Fax 360-379-4451 shoskins(n?co.jefferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW `iA SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 1 Chapter 18.35.120 JCC Preliminary short plat contents. (1) A preliminary short plat shall be submitted on one or more sheets and shall provide the information described below. All specifications for required improvements shall conform to the development standards contained in Chapter 18.30 JCC. (a) The name of the proposed subdivisions together with the words "Preliminary Short Plat"; (b) The name and address of the applicant; (c) The name, address, stamp and signature of the professional engineer or professional land surveyor who prepared the preliminary plat; (d) Numeric scale (50 feet or fewer to the inch), graphic scale, true north point, and date of preparation; (e) Identification of all land intended to be cleared, and the location of the proposed access to the site for clearing and grading during site development or construction; and (f) A form for the endorsement of the administrator, as follows: APPROVED BY JEFFERSON COUNTY Department of Community Date Development Administrator (2) The preliminary plat shall contain a vicinity sketch sufficient to define the location and boundaries of the proposed subdivision with respect to surrounding property, roads, and other major constructed and natural features. (3) Except as otherwise specified in this chapter, the preliminary short plat shall contain the following existing geographic features, drawn lightly in relation to proposed geographic features: (a) The boundaries of the property to be subdivided, and the boundaries of any adjacent property under the same ownership as the land to be subdivided, to be indicated by bold lines; (b) The names of all adjoining property owners, or names of adjoining developers; (c) All existing property lines lying within the proposed subdivision, including lot lines for lots of record which are to be vacated, and all existing property lines for any property adjacent to the subject property which is under the same ownership as the property to be subdivided (as described in JCC 18.35.110(3)) shall be shown in broken lines; (d) The location, right-of-way widths, pavement widths and names of all existing or platted roads, whether public or private, and other public ways within 200 feet of the property to be divided; (e) The location, widths and purposes of any existing easements lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision; (f) The location, size and invert elevation of sanitary sewer lines and stormwater management facilities lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision or those that will be connected to the subdivision as part of the proposal (if applicable); (g) The location and size of existing water system facilities including all fire hydrants lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision or those which will be connected to as part of the proposed subdivision (if applicable); (h) The location, size and description of any other underground and overhead facilities lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision (if applicable); (i) The location of any environmentally sensitive areas as described in Article VI-D of Chapter 18.15 JCC, including all floodplains lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision; e -5 (j) The location of existing sections and municipal corporation boundary lines lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision; (k) The location of any well and associated setbacks existing within the proposed subdivision; (I) The location of any individual or on-site sewage disposal system existing within the proposed subdivision; (m) Existing contour lines at intervals of five feet, labeled at intervals not to exceed 20 feet; (n) The location of any existing structures lying within the proposed subdivision; existing structures to be removed shall be indicated by broken lines, and existing structures not to be removed shall be indicated by solid lines. (4) The preliminary plat shall show the following proposed geographic features: (a) The boundaries in bold solid lines of any proposed lots, tracts or parcels, the area and dimensions of each proposed lot, tract or parcel, and the proposed identifying number or letter to be assigned to each lot, tract or parcel, and block (if applicable); (b) The right-of-way location and width, the proposed name of each road, street or other public way to be created and the estimated tentative grades of such roads; where roadways may exceed the maximum allowable grade or alignment, the director of the department of public works may require sufficient data, including centerline profiles and cross-sections, if necessary, to determine the feasibility of said roadway; (c) The location, width and purpose of each easement to be created; (d) The boundaries, dimensions and area of public and common park and open space areas; (e) Identification of all areas proposed to be dedicated for public use, together with the purpose and any condition of dedication; (f) Proposed final contour lines at intervals of five feet; final contour lines shall be indicated by solid lines; contour lines shall be labeled in intervals not to exceed 20 feet; (g) The building envelope, as defined in JCC 18.10.020, shall be indicated for each lot; (h) Proposed monumentation; (I) Proposed location and description of all individual or community wells, or water system improvements, including fire hydrants (if applicable); (j) Proposed location and description of all sewage disposal improvements, including (if applicable) profiles and all pump stations and their connections to the existing system; (k) Proposed location and description of all stormwater management improvements; (I) Proposed road cross-sections, showing bicycle and pedestrian pathways, trails and sidewalks (if applicable); (m) Proposed type and location of road lighting (if applicable); (n) Proposed type and location of landscaping (if applicable); (o) Proposed location and description of transit stops and shelters (if applicable); (p) Proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs) on development (if applicable). (5) Upon review of an application, the administrator may require additional pertinent information, as deemed necessary, to satisfy any other regulatory requirements. The administrator may also waive specific submittal requirements determined to be unnecessary for review of an application. In such event, the administrator shall document the waiver in the project file or log. [Ord. 11-00 § 7.3(4)] Chapter 18.35.190 JCC Accompanying documents — Final short plat. (1) In cases where any restrictive deed covenants or CC&Rs will apply to lots or parcels within a subdivision, a type written copy of such covenants, bearing all necessary signatures, shall be submitted along with the final plat. Where the recordation of specific deed restrictions or CC&R provisions have been required as a condition of preliminary plat approval, the administrator shall approve and sign the deed restriction or CC&Rs prior to final plat approval. (2) The final plat shall be accompanied by a current (i.e., within 30 days) title company certification of the following: (a) The legal description of the total parcel sought to be subdivided; (b) Those individuals or corporations holding an ownership interest and any security interest (such as deeds or trust or mortgages) or any other encumbrances affecting the title of said parcel. Such individuals or corporations shall sign and approve the final plat prior to final approval; (c) Any lands to be dedicated shall be confirmed as being owned in fee title by the owner(s) signing the dedication certificate; (d) Any easements or restrictions affecting the property to be subdivided with a description of purpose and referenced by the auditor's file number and/or recording number; and (e) If lands are to be dedicated or conveyed to the county as part of the subdivision, an American Land Title Association (A.L.T.A.) policy may be required by the director of the department of public works. (3) All maintenance, performance and guarantee bonds or other guarantees as may be required by the director of the department of public works and the approved improvement method report to guarantee the acceptability and/or performance of all required improvements. [Ord. 11-00 § 7.3(11)] Chapter 18.35.370 JCC Preparation of a final long plat. The final long plat shall be prepared in accordance with the following requirements: (1) The final plat shall be prepared by a land surveyor licensed by the state of Washington or a Washington state licensed engineer. (2) Six paper copies of the final long plat shall be submitted, measuring 18 inches by 24 inches in size, allowing one-half inch for border. (3) A final long plat shall contain the following information: (a) The name of the subdivision; (b) Legal description of the property being subdivided; (c) Numeric scale, graphic scale, true north point and date of preparation of the final plat; (d) The lot line of the plat, referenced to county (USC&GS) datum and based on an accurate traverse, with angular and linear dimensions and bearings; (e) The exact location, width and name of all roads, streets, alleys and other public ways within and adjacent to the subdivision; (f) The exact location, width and purpose of all easements and dedications for rights-of- way provided for public and private services and utilities; (g) True courses and distances to the nearest established road lines, or sections or quarter section corner monuments which shall accurately locate the subdivision; (h) Section lines accurately tied to the lines of the plat by distances and courses; (i) All lot and block numbers (if applicable) and lines, with accurate dimensions in feet and hundredths of feet; (j) All house address numbers as assigned by the county; (k) Delineation of the building envelope of each lot; (I) The radii, internal angles, points of curvature, tangent bearings and lengths of arc; (m) The accurate location of each permanent control monument; (n) All plat meander lines or reference lines along bodies of water shall be established as above, but not farther than 20 feet from the high water line of such body; (o) Accurate outlines and legal descriptions of any areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose of such dedication or reservation and any limitations indicated thereon and in dedication; (p) Accurate outlines of any area to be reserved by the deed covenant for common use of owners of property within the subdivision, together with the purposes of such reservation; (q) Any restrictions or conditions on the lots or tracts within the subdivision, as required by the county or at the discretion of the property owner, including but not limited to environmentally sensitive areas buffers; (r) The auditor's file number of all documents and conveyances recorded with the Jefferson County auditor associated with preliminary or final plat approval; (s) The name and seal of the Washington State licensed land surveyor or Washington State licensed engineer responsible preparation of the final plat, and a signed certification on the plat by said surveyor to the effect that it is a true and correct representation of the land actually surveyed by him or her, that the existing monuments shown thereon exist as located and that all dimensional and geodetic details are correct; (t) A signed, notarized certification stating that the subdivision has been made with the free consent and in accordance with the desires of the all persons with ownership and/or security interests in the property. If the plat includes a dedication, the certificate or a separate written instrument shall contain the dedication of all roads and other areas to the public, any individual or individuals, or to any corporation, public or private, as shown on the plat. Such certificate or instrument shall be signed and acknowledged before a notary public by all parties having any interest in the land subdivided. The owner shall waive all claims against the county, on behalf of the owner and the owner's successors and assigns, which may be occasioned by the establishment and/or construction of any roads, streets, storm drainage improvements or other improvements; (u) An offer of dedication may include a waiver of right of direct access to any road from any property. Such waiver may be required by the director of the department of public works as a condition of approval. Any dedication, donation or grant as shown on the face of the plat shall be considered as a quit claim deed to the said donee or grantee for use for the purpose intended by the donation or grant; (v) Signature blocks for the appropriate certification of the county auditor, director of the department of public works, director of the public health department, and DCD administrator, as follows: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CERTIFICATE I hereby certify to the best of my knowledge that this final plat is in compliance with the certificate of improvements issued pursuant to the Jefferson County Unified Development Code and is consistent with all applicable county improvement standards and requirements in force on the date of preliminary plat approval, this day of 20_ Director, Jefferson County Department of Public Works DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR'S CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that on this day of , 20_, that this final plat is in substantial conformance with the preliminary plat and any conditions attached thereto, which preliminary plat was approved by Jefferson County on the day of , 20 Administrator, Jefferson County Community Development Department JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DIRECTOR CERTIFICATE Approved by public health department the on this day of , 20_ Director, Jefferson County Public Health Dept. • TREASURER All taxes and/or assessments due are paid in full on this day of 20 Jefferson County Treasurer (w) A form of the approval of the County assessor, as follows: ASSESSOR'S APPROVAL Examined and approved this day of , 20_ Jefferson County Assessor Attest: Deputy Jefferson County Assessor (x) A form for the certificate of the Jefferson County recorder, as follows: RECORDING CERTIFICATE Filed for record at the request of Jefferson County this day of 20 , at minutes past _M., and recorded in Volume of Plats, page Records of Jefferson County, Washington. Jefferson County Recording Number Manager Superintendent of Records (y) Any additional pertinent information as required at the discretion of the director of the department of public works or the DCD administrator. (4) All signatures or certifications appearing on a final plat shall in be reproducible black ink. [Ord. 11-00 § 7.4(11)] Lard--�Q.0 d .�l v� ( , -, f\cca'`�.��d c.:,kP ,, Le < C( k,a ,2eg) P()) - -Pic 1\14 5K-a5\, 582251 V: 5 P: 148 Pp:1 of 3 SPLAY 92/26/2614 66'.S9 AR ,SIRS SS JEFF CO OEPT OF Cohn ].11.rtof County XF Pudllor'f O,IIC- Own-Eldnd,a. NMller ID! Y'�i E'.iF�iiii;v a�:llIt1�x� ti II III SUS#12-00011/MLA/2-00141 MA UNL' Y/R O GER S ON TR US T SHORT PLAT IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON APPROVALS: DESCR/P77ON: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CERTIFICATE: GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE•�THAT�THIS FINAL EAST, W.M., EXCEPT THE RIGHT OF WAY FORA PUBLIC ROAD GRANTED PLAT IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CERTIFICATE OF IMPROVEMENTS ISSUED TOT JEFFERSON COUNTY OVER THE WEST 15 EYED BY THE NORTH DE PURSUANT TO THE JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE AND FEET OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1, AS CONVEYED 8Y DEED RECORDED IS CONSISTENT WITH ALL APPLICABLE COUNTY_IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS UNDER AUDITOR'S RLE NO. 75494, IN VOLUME 1 OF ROAD WAIVERS, AND REQUIREMENTS IN FORCE ON TH4 DATE OF-PRELIMINARY RLAT PAGE 548, RECORDS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON. APPROVAL, THIS Y OF /".. 44,,y,..,.., , 20fi4.., '., SITUATE IN COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF WASHINGTON. _ / / DIRECTOR, SON COUNTY A MENT OA PUBLIC WORKS / I DEPARTMENT OF.COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADM1NISTRATQQ�S CE TIFICAT I HEREBY CERTIFY ON TFIS IL--DAY\,OF AR..)I 2014, THAT THIS FINAL PLAT IS IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE ITH THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND ANY CONDITIONS ATTACHED,THEREJ. WHICH PRELIMINARY PLAT WAS APPROVED DECLARATION; BY FERSON COUNnY ON THE--- /DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2012. KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE, THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS OF THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED, DECLARE THIS PLAT TO BE CREATED BY OUR -- (4 .,- OWN FREE WILL AND CONSENT WE ALSO GRANT TO THE LOT OWNERS WITHIN pp l3 RA JEFFERSON NTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT THIS PLAT THE RIGHT TO USE THE EASEMENTS AS PLATTED FOR THE USES AND , 1 PURPOSES SHOWN. 1 �`., M4UNEY/ROGERSON REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST JEFFERSON"C01/NTY PUBLIC HEALTH £( r-e_-- DIRECTOR'S-CERTIFICATE MARC MAUNEY, TRUSTEE LYNN ROG RSON, TRUSTEE -.� • APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT ON THIS 7.13'fDAY NN 'N OE *w4m , 2014. T(� , JEFF£ ON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT /. � d l 1 �/' ;� ' ) -COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: N/ / , APPROVED BY THE JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS THIS .2yTrfl `\ �� -._i DAY OF re tit an, , 2014. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) --_ SS / � , M., COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) -- .� �,/ CHAIR AN, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS \ �E1� THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ON THIS L�* DAY OF Jo4v.u, r((,,%� I 201.7, 1 /) BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE'ST4TE'OF ) , CA'�V�y'q`��',,! _ WASHINGTON DULY COMMISSIONED AND SWORN PERSONALLY APPF,ARED' N--__,/ / ATTEST: CLERK OF BOARD REUEVOCABLE LMNG TRUST.ROGERSON. ,AS EXECUTED THE OF ORE¢O£IN, INSTRUMENT,AND- ,= ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT THEY SIGNED THE SAME AS TH EE AND„ COUNTY TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE; VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED FOR THE USES AND PURPOS THEJZEI •ENT1NED. ALL TAXES AND ANY DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS FOR WHICH THE LAND WITHIN WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND TAR FIRST ABOVEITT NDELINQUENT THE LAND DIVISION MAY BE LIABLE HAVE BEEN DULY PAID AS REQUIRED BY /,pc"�"[",(�¢- ^�N CHAPTER 58.08.040 R.C.W.. -1 ^f� L{ N T C � FD 0 THE STATE OT�WASHINfTON a1dl E. MOO(�S US•t a� l lOU+i I• RESIDING AT �' I DATE MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES IO-II- .O((o v -� JEFFERSON COUNTY UISURER DEPUTY COUNTY ASSESSOR'S APPROVAL: `Notary Public j' Stott of Washington \, \l EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS 96 DAY OF , 2014. DIANE L TANDY-0UERREAO I MY COMMISSION F.1lPIRES, , �� k October 11,201H --- r erhaiorryin ,-- `\ � \ _ / . � JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR ATTE : DEPUTY COUNTY ASSESSOR �� \ RECORDING CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND THIS DAY OF 4h�A. 1 v 2014, AT �:5o MINUTES PAST�,M., SURVEYORS. CERTIFIATE' AND RECORDED IN VOLUME .0 OF SHORT PLATS PAGE MO , THIS MAP CORRECTLY%?EPRESENTS,.4 SURV£1` RECORDS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON. CONDUCTED BY ME OR uND6R MY'SL/PERVISION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE OUIREMENTS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER 225 I . I` THE SURPEY RECORDING ACT. TITLE / 51 Rcw. DONNA M.ELORIDGE MANAGER yG dB'ill',. SUPERINTENDENT OF RECORDS SHEET 1 OF 3 . OR LA LS PO.Bar]199 -��iAt-9!. L.S. NUMBER J8958S 935 PI 5th Ave. LAND SURVEYING ' a Spcm.WA 963e2 G ,...� DATE. Or//11 MAPPING FINAL CHECK: Sec DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING PLAT CHECK: sec ,CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT DRAWN BY JKB SER/: 01E2909-MAUNEY_SP_BASE-022012 _ 562251 V: 5 P: 141 Py 2 of 3 SPLAT 02/25/2014 08:50 IM $136.00 JEFF CO DEPT OF COMM Jefferson County YA Auditor's Office-Dons Eldridge.Autllor �iiimiiiKID61110 4 1 .1A*15 III SUB#12-00011/MLA12-00141 MAUNF,' Y/ROGL'RSON TRUST SHORT PLAT IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., 4 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON 2 9 2 N m QUARTER CORNER L.N 6 FOUND 4"x 4" CONCRETE p N *3 MON IN ALUMINUM CASE !`?2 N (4/09/04) 2 ¢Jl 16.11) MN RA4D a CENTER OF SECTION 9 - FOUND CONC. �O O 4! MON IN ALUMINUM CASE. (1/23/09) NORTH E LINE OF I _ _ \, 2}N}.�1/4 ' IS'N FOUND 1 1/2" BRASS CAP WITH PUNCH , _ o IN MONUMENT WELL. (1/23/09) „ (� / �‘ --- MONUMENT LIES S09'31'11"If; 2.79' '`I I ` ■ FROM TRUE 1/167H CORNER EDGE OF GRAVEL l / `. 150 75 0 150 ROAD PER FIELD "\ _ TIES 2/20/12. S8T52'44E 1 �\ =' SCALE IN FEET 41 ?•rws•*/4;4'x«i w∎i w ..,.:w 1317.32' (/�/�/ I 419.30' `�'T' !•J1•_w/�'dl Xi iii/jw_i wji iti wow w`w�/ 4:41720:::,' / // ."f'_'.�// f `�"`.`.` WATER SL-5'I. 883.02' DISNEY !) / TWP. SL-4•. N I : ..77oo IV A/ 15' SL-3yp APPROX.I E DUTCH!' —_ _B \ 1 �,, SCALE 100' o sL-2 0.12 ACRES. NORTH, /%SL-7 SL-1 \ OF WETLAND,AND ° ::.'� 'o LD 1 \ SOUTH OF ROAD/ SL-8 \ I N �t, G T T T 1 L STORAGE _ 4L+ SL-15 Q� �� L0 3 sL49 SHEDS ,. SL-19-�, 'Co" 1 0 109 I` 4 7,507\sq. ft. I I ` SL-14 / / 1 .04 D as .. , sL-2o �; FENCE 20.9'E. �, VOL.L PG' C( / .,, •' ' SURVEYS' p N �. �" • I r; `ro SU 60' WETLAND D ItyGE 01TCH 4 op I �c'.'<`• r' i I EDGE OF GRAVEL W ti �'`E. . �ROAD PER FiELO BUFFER TYP. \,,,. ,,Os W^ I a 2 p SEPTIC UD p , �'!� IfES 2/z0/r2. / \` 314eW1 q _ SL-21-- _it,__N 'ii SEPTIC MOUND LOT 2 /J I ti 60 H"' I Yy ^O \ SL-1.3 11?-41 4 SfPoJ-63 485,872 S . ft.” '` �- . \ ti �{ \ STORAGE 75' � i ,1; 1 L 75 acres I \ ` \ t1 ® SHEDS s. EE DETAIL v-=I 4,?`R f /.--,1 l ,- �.,-�. \ G 1'�, NORTH END �1� ' & // '-'..''/''''.` 1 I , ' (2) 1 ELECTRIC FENCE 'IPl PROPANE TANK ' •/'` �- / / ►"- \ HEN' -' i ti -v, 3.50' / I / o RESERVE AREA S ti /�.,�, '-\\_- l I ' LINE TABLE S87'S332E �� \ sfPa3-s3 w. ti "�y�,L�``, °°.1 ` LINE BEARING LENGTH • ,n,e I EXISTING WELL ti ff ,```, TOP OF 15.00' HIM( j A_ !(ND TAG) LOT 1 1 7Z"\-::`,` n-y��. ' '" SLOPE / ti L 1 N53'02'47 E 79.47 \\ '$, / Wr SUITABLE.581 584 sq. (t.l `` .- �_ /x-� J` V\ L 13 12 N48'39'J9E 69.07 FOR USE. 13.35 OCres I ` -., ti 0 % LJ N53'18'04E 98.11' t EXISTING WELL \ -----` ` l =� \, L4 N50'3031 E 66.36' EDGE OF PER FIELD n (NO TAG) IN \ � ``. / 27,96' \0 L5 N5030 31 t 96.05' ROAD PER FIELD \I N STORAGE WELL HOUSE. \ `� '` TIES 2/20/12. R SHEDS NOT SUITABLE y ti' ti 2 L LINE OF L6 N54'S550E 62.53' / f� /FOR POTABLE \ / 6'0-./�_'�J ti L DRAINAGE VEGETATION 9 L7 N5I'40"30E 93.82' RESIDENCE I USE ® I T -` l . ''� l / DITCH / 1.8 N49'07'14 E 62.1?' \ � I � ti� "� I;60'h / \� L9 N51'1015E 137.84' t ��- L L]0 N54'1631E 52.97 ,`� \ --/\N \,„,--::ti-`" ; / / \1 1p1LS,N01 L 11 N50"44'03"E 92.70' NEW / � ` l ' / ,/// ,,pL U�,10 51R L12 N48'48'521' 74.6J' BIBBED h EXISTING RESERVE:'AREAC �"� --- -II I 01f"$0 10 L 13 N51'40'48"E 29.57' WIRE FENCE }V SEPTIC SEP 3-B8 N'� 1 .` ' �- ` 1 q PD O EO �O DRVNfIELO 72 `" \ ` N,P.68' �5o ��1� LEGEND; QUARTER COI,({NER( /\/ _ - 0 • DENOTES SET 5/8" REBAR WITH PLASTIC SURVEY CAP STAMPED.' FOUND 4"x '' C011C. \N \. CLARK 38956". (5/06/13) MON WITH B N PIA , .��Q/ (2/20/12) \ p �`' LINE OF • DENOTES FOUND 5/8" REBAR WITH PLASTIC SURVEY CAP STAMPED: 9 547.5)fNN VEGETATION A. WOOD 23911". (1/23/09) 16 S8751'O5/ ,' \r'" \ 17 DENOTES FOUND 3/4" SO. IRON PIN. (5/06/73) _ �\ / ALSO FOUND 5/8" REBAR & CAP / -\ ,r STAMPED: A. WOOD 23911" • DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND AND ACCEPTED AS NOTED. (1/23/09) '5 1 N66'00'28'E 0.61' II (� i 1 ii DENOTES TEST PIT LOCATION PER JSF ENGINEERING (4/24/12) LEGEND: 'N• / d MAW DENOTES EXISTING WATER METER. TORT FULLER DENOTES EXISTING,GRAVEL EIRIVEW4Y_ _% OUTS PARR �� VECINRY ASAP tT a DENOTES EXISTING WELL, NO ID TAG, FOR IRRIGATION ONLY. PER FIELD TIES I%23/Q9; NO SCALE NOT APPROVED FOR USE AS POTABLE WATER. • NT '� 1� „i RIGHT OF WAY,PER 0EED RECORNT�£b I _ 1 NOTES; UNDER-4PN 45-g6.20. �` 1. THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED BY FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS USING A 5 d AIL 111 ,iila SECOND TOPCON GTS-235W TOTAL STATION AND STEEL TAPE. L--i - DENOTES WETLY"'. FIELD;TIES 11/28/Y,Z, \. / �� II 2. FOR BASIS OF BLARING AND SECTION SUBDIVISION RE DATA, SEE VOL. 7 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 101, RECORDS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ALSO `" \\ SEE UNRECORDED SURVEY BY J.T. LAY DATED MARCH 1948 ON FILE WITH THE \\ JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE. i l 3. WETLAND REPORT AND DELINEATION BY LOGGY SOIL AND WETLAND CONSULTING. ' Ilk iiii iii �Y$. / 4. RESERVE AREA FOR DRAINF7ELD SHOWN HEREON BY JSF ENGINEERING INC. cG��tr`AS'; _ TITLED "WASTEWATER SYSTEM PLAN"AND DATED 11/26/12. Al SHEET 2 OF 3 �"y 1/ � N.T.S. �, webs / !Alto�,�� �i ' P.O.Bog 2199 Ilk'0. ..R� r' kiip.4.1.7- � ■� LA D SURVEYING 17 C ? F�N 5th A 9{•s•R.T8T�. 935 DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT F O E8-5 9630z r''gg......MAL L11�' Ees'ssol 5, <'L . DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING Q /1� FINAL CHECK: SRC PLAT CHECK: SEC I , SUBJECT ��\ X ____'__ Cj� !j (888)081-2161 DRAWN BY: JKE PROPERTY 9(29N-1E) �_�..,�1` SERA: 01E2909-MAVNEY_SP BASE-022012 _ 582251 V: 5 P: 142 P9.3 of 3 PLAT ai,f.Blan ou66y 30 Rwumllj'35.018i JEFF^�SEIJr10va Audi br um r•lpPhlkllIVIIi. „N G� fi 11111 . SUB/11-00011/M[Al2-00141 MA UNE Y/R O GER S ON TRUST SHORT PLAT IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M,, JEFFERSON COUNTY WASHINGTON NOTICE TO POTENTIAL PURCHASERS; NOTICE TO POTENTIAL PURCHASERS: \ , I. THE LOTS, PARCELS OR TRACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION WERE 13. WETLAND BUFFERS SHALL REMAIN NATURALLY VEGETATED. APPROVED BASED ON DESIGN STANDARDS AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS IN 4_ EFFECT AT THE TIME OF FINAL APPROVAL. ONSITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS A PERMANENT PHYSICAL SEPARATION ALONG THE UPLAND. BOUNDARY OF THE HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED FOR THE LOTS, PARCELS OR TRACTS CONTAINED WITH WETLAND BUFFER AREA SHALL BE-INSTALLED-AND-PERMANENTLY MAINTAINED. THIS SUBDIVISION. ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS SHALL MEET DESIGN STANDARDS AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF WETLAND BUFFER PERIMETERS SHALL BE MARKED WITH) TEMPORARY SIGNS AT APPLICATION FOR A SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT. PURCHASER SHOULD CONTACT THE INTERVALS OF ONE PER PARCEL/OR EVERY ONE HUNDRED'(100) FEET, WHICHEVER JEFFERSON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT FOR PROCEDURES IS LESS. SIGNS SHALL B IN PLACE- PRIOR TO AND DURING CONSTRUCTION CONCERNING PERMIT APPLICATIONS. ANY REMOVAL OF OR MAJOR DISTURBANCES ACTIVITIES. THE SIGNS ALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT. 'BUFFER-DO NOT OF SOIL WITHIN THE PROPOSED DRAINFIELD AREAS MAY CREATE SITE CONDITIONS REMOVE OR ALTER EX/ST „VEGETATION". , THAT ARE UNACCEPTABLE FOR ME INSTALLATION OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS. ; ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVIS,SHALL NOT ENCROACH UPON THE WETLAND BUFFERS. 2. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE TURNAROUND FOR FIRE AND EMERGENCY THIS INCLUDES 7IE STORAGE-pR PR£PARA M> N OF MATERIALS. VEHICLES, THE INITIAL 30 FOOT SEGMENT OF THE DRIVEWAY FROM DISNEY ROAD TO THE RESIDENCES ON LOTS 2 AND 3 SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 20 FOOT WIDTH LIGHTING FROM AN./SOURCE S ILL SE'DIRECTED AWAY FROM THE WETLAND WITH A MINIMUM 6 INCHES COMPACTED GRAVEL BASE AND 2 INCHES OF BUFFERS. 1 \ COMPACTED CRUSHED ROCK. 1 i 14. POTABLE,WATER, IS TO...BE,S£R D TO EACH PARCEL BY THE OU/MPER WATER 3. DISNEY ROAD IS A PRIVATE ROAD. THERE IS NOT A ROAD MAINTENANCE /SYSTEM./THE EA TING WELLS HOWN ON THE PLAT ARE INTENDED FOR IRRIGATION AGREEMENT FOR DISNEY ROAD. / ONLY-NO WATER QUALITY, QUANTITY INFORMATION FOR THESE WELLS WERE SOBMITTEO FOR fl VIEW. THE I00' SANITARY CONTROL AREA FOR THE WELLS SHALL 4. OUTDOOR RESIDENTIAL STORAGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED 1N AN ORDERLY MANNER 7 (BE PROTECTED'FROM POTENTIAL SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION SUCH AS SEPTIC AND SHALL CREATE NO FIRE SAFETY, HEALTH OR SANITARY HAZARD. ;TANKS AND DRAINFIELDS, SEWER LINES, UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS PUBLIC \ ROADS VEHICLES, NON-RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES, BARNS, FEED STATIONS, GRAZING 5. NOT MORE THAN 2 UNLICENSED VEHICLES SHALL BE STORED ON ANY LOT UNLESS ANIMALS, ENCLOSURES FOR MAINTAINING FOWL OR ANIMAL MANURE, LIQUID OR DRY TOTALLY SCREENED FROM VIEW OF NEIGHBORING DWELLINGS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY. \ CHEMICAL STORAGE,' HERBICIDES, INSECTICIDES, HAZARDOUS WASTE, OR SOLID WASTE SUCH SCREENING SHALL MEET ALL APPLICABLE PERFORMANCE AND DEVELOPMENT `'-.9F ANY KIND OR/DESCRIPTION. STANDARDS SPECIFIC TO THE DISTRICT IN WHICH THE STORAGE IS KEPT, AND SHALL BE IN KEEPING WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA. SCREENING SHALL ADDRESSES-SHALL BE APPLIED FOR AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 18.30 JCC. OUTDOOR STORAGE OF 3 OR �^\ 15. MORE JUNK MOTOR VEHICLES IS PROHIBITED EXCEPT IN THOSE DISTRICTS WHERE / SPECIFIED AS AN AUTOMOBILE WRECKING YARD OR JUNK (OR SALVAGE) YARD AND ''N N., ALLOWED AS A PERMITTED USE IN TABLE 3-7 OR CHAPTER 18.18 JCC, AND SUCH � STORAGE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF JCC 18.20.100, AUTOMOBILE WRECKING YARDS AND JUNK (OR SALVAGE) YARDS. IN NO CASE, SHALL ANY SUCH �. N` JUNK MOTOR VEHICLES BE STORED IN A CRITICAL AREA. „ — I 6. EXTERIOR LIGHTING FOR RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL NOT EXCEED TWENTY FEET (202 ^� \� IN HEIGHT FROM THE FINISHED GRADE EXCEPT WHEN SUCH LIGHTING IS AN (/ /N �� INTEGRAL PART OF BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. GROUND LEVEL LIGHTING/IS ) j \ ENCOURAGED. I ' EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL BE ENERGY EFFICIENT AND SHIELDED OR REC�SE � , MAT DIRECT GLARE AND REFLECTIONS ARE CONTAINED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES '\ OF THE PARCEL. \\ \ EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL BE DIRECTED DOWNWARD AND AWAY FROM;aDJOIN%NG \ PROPERTIES AND PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. NO LIGHTING SHALL BLINK,;£LASH, Ol, \,, BE OF UNUSUALLY HIGH INTENSITY OR BRIGHTNESS. l \ I . ALL LIGHTING FIXTURES SHALL BE APPROPRIATE IN SOLE INTENSITY*to HEIGHT ; TO THE USE THEY ARE SERVING. ,/ \_, / �% \ 7. ANY FURTHER SUBDIVISION OF THE LOTS WITHIN TH15�;PL.,A1 WILL E UBJECT TO' THE DENSITIES PERMITTED IN THE JEFFERSON COUNTY OOOIN21NCES O CODES IN EFFECT AT TIME OF SUCH APPLICATION. THESE LOTS'4 4Y 19R'MAY NOT.DE FURTHER SUBDIVIDED IN THE FUTURE. ` \ 8. APPROVAL OF THIS SUBDIVISION DOES N CONS77 UT APPROVAL OF'BUILDING OR SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMITS ON EACH LO PERM)T` I?QVAL WILI!�� BE SUBJECT TO BUILDING LOT PLANS, TYPE OF USE, CO OURS, A SOILS,ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS. PERMITS WILL BE REVIEWED IN ACCORDAN WITH SITE COND)TIQNS;lII111AND REGULATIONS EXISTING ON THE DATE THE P RANTS ARE APPLIED'FOR. 9. ANY REMOVAL OF OR MAJOR DISTURBANCE OF'SOIL\WITHII THE PROPOSED DRAINFIELD AREAS MAY CREATE SITE C NOITIONS�THAT'ARE UNACCEPTABLE OF THE INSTALLATION OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS. \ �N/ ' 10. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT SHALL NOT,EXCEEO'j5 FEET, 11. MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE SHALL)NO EXCEED 25X. LOT COVERAGE IS DEFINED AS AMOUNT QF IMPERVIOUS ,SURFACE WHICH INCLUDES ROOF TOPS, DRIVEWAYS, CONCRETE, 'ETC. 12. MINIMUM SETBACKS FROM BALDWIN ROAD AND DISNEY ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY SHALL BE 20 FEET. MINIMUM'SIDE YARD SETBACKS SHALL BE 5 FEET. ./`-1 i N� V 0 N / J I 1 SHEET 3 OF 3 7 r!y N.T.S. {� CLARK �.D.Box 2199 x , h4�01311# CLARK 535 N 5th A . ti IJi=0 LAND SURVEYING Sequin.WA 98382 .. e,1, 1 MAPPING LAND (360)581-2161 T.,,, FINAL CHECK: SBC X DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING y� _ PAX 653-5310 PLAT CHECK: SBC CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CE (585)661-261. DRAWN BY: JKB 9(29N-1E) ” ,A SER/f: 01E2909-MAUNEY_SP_BASE-022012 Colleen Zmolek From: Colleen Zmolek Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 9:15 AM To: CAO Staff Subject: Consent Agenda request for February 24, 2014 Good Morning, Consent Agenda request for the February 24, 2014 agenda. The request is a Short Plat approval and signatures. Attached Agenda request in PDF&Word document. Attachments Administrative Summary Decision & Preliminary Short Plat Approval. The 1 Mylar and 6 paper copies of the Short Plat that requires signatures will be sent with the interoffice packet for the consent agenda. Please call or email if you have any questions. Colleen Zmolek Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4462 czmolek[a)co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Our office is open to the public 9:oo a.m.—4:3o p.m. Monday to Thursday, closed Fridays. 1 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY DECISION Marc Mauney& Lynne Rogerson MAUNEY/ROGERSON SHORT PLAT; SUB12-00011/MLA12-00141 Proposal: The proposal is to subdivide 34.54-acres into three residential lots. Lot 1 will consist of 13.35-acres, Lot 2 will be 11.15-acres and Lot 3 will be 10.04 acres. Lot 1 has two existing single family residences, each served by an on- site septic system, and several detached out-buildings and two on-site wells. Access to Lot 1 is via Baldwin Road. Lots 2 and 3 are vacant and will be accessed by Disney Road. The parcels are located within the Quimper public water system and Lots 2 & 3 would be served by an on-site septic system. A wetland has been identified on the parcel that spans all 3 of the proposed lots and requires a 60-foot buffer. Development of the lots will occur outside the wetland and its associated buffer. Property Location: The property is located at 91 Baldwin Road, Nordland; at the intersection of SR 116 and Robbins Road take Robbins Road south and then east to the intersection of Baldwin Road and Disney Road. Parcel is to the east of Baldwin Road and south of Disney Road. Legal Description: APN 921-094-026; Gov't Lot 1 except the right-of-way for a public road granted to Jefferson County over the west 15 feet of the north 660 feet of said Gov't Lot 1 as conveyed by deed recorded under AFN 75494 in Vol. 1 of Road Waivers, Page 548 records of Jefferson County, Washington within Section 9, Township 29 North Range 1 East, WM. Property Description: The parcel slopes to the south/southeast. Disney Road runs parallel to the north property boundary and Baldwin Road runs parallel to the west property boundary. The southeast property boundary runs parallel to the shoreline. Proposed Lot 1 has two existing single family residences, out buildings, two septic systems and two on-site wells. There is a drainage ditch that starts at the middle of Disney Road and runs to the south property line. A category III wetland exists on-site near the shoreline that spans all three proposed lots. There is a stand of trees at the northeast corner and at the intersection of Baldwin Road and Disney Road. The majority of the parcel is cleared. Elevation at the intersection of Baldwin Road and Disney Road is approximately 93 feet. The south/southeast elevations are approximately 8-9 feet. Northeast corner is approximately 52 feet and the southwest corner is approximately 48 feet. Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA12-00141/SUB12-00011 Page 1 of20 Community Plan: The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates the site as Rural Residential 1:10. Surrounding Arca: The smallest parcel in the vicinity of the proposed subdivision consists of approximately 0.67-acres. There are a variety of parcel sizes ranging from 68.43-acres that is owned by the State Park and Recreation to 9 and 5-acre parcels to tracts that are just over an acre in size. Several of the surround parcels have single family residences and several parcels are undeveloped. Access to surrounding parcels is via Robbins Road, Baldwin Road, Disney Road, East Marrowstone Road, Lip Lip Lane, and private easements. Applicable Goals and Policies: Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Chapter 3, "Rural Residential Land Use Policies",pages 3-47 to 3-49. Chapter 3, "Transportation Policies",page 3-61. Chapter 3, "Rural Character Policies", 3-61 to 3-64. Applicable Ordinances: Ordinance No. 11-1218-00,Jefferson County Code(Title 18) SEPA:The proposed short subdivision is subject to environmental review under WAC 197-11-800 (6)(a); approval of short plats on lands covered by water. Notice Information: Mailed to county agencies and adjacent property owners December 12, 2012. Published in the December 19, 2012 edition of the Jefferson County-Port Townsend Leader. Applicant's representative posted the site on December 18,2012 per Affidavit of Posting Notice. Testimony: No verbal or written testimony was received on this application. Agency Responses: • County Public Works Department: Written comments dated December 17, 2012 are hereby incorporated by reference. • County Health Department: Written comments dated October 15, 2012 & January 14, 2013 are hereby incorporated by reference. • Jefferson County Assessor's Office: Written comments dated December 14 &21, 2012 are hereby incorporated by reference. • Department of Ecology: Written comments dated January 2, 2013 are hereby incorporated by reference. • City of Port Townsend Community Development: No comment received. • PUD #1: No comment received. • Jefferson Transit: No comment received. • Port of Port Townsend: No comment received. • WDFW SEPA: No comment received. Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLAl2-00141/SUB 12-00011 Page 2 of 20 • DNR SEPA: No comment received. • DOE—Wetlands, Rick Mraz: No comment received. • Department of Archaeology& Historic Preservation: No comment received. • East Jefferson Fire & Rescue: No comment received. • Port Townsend School District 49: No comment received. • Hoh Indian Tribe: No comment received. • Point No Point Treaty Council: No comment received. • Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe: No comment received. • Quinault Indian Nation: No comment received. • Quileute Nation: No comment received. • Skokomish Tribe: No comment received. • Suquamish Tribe: No comment received. • Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe: No comment received. Staff Findings and Conclusions: 1. The proposal is to subdivide 34.54 acres parcel into three (3)residential lots. 2. The proposed short subdivision is subject to the policies of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. The applicable policies are discussed below. 3. The proposed short subdivision is subject to the requirements of Chapters 18.30 and 18.35 of the Jefferson County Code (JCC). There are several ordinance requirements that apply to the proposed subdivision: Chapter 18.30.30 JCC Water Supplies; Chapter 18.30.040 JCC Sewage Disposal; Chapter 18.30.080 and 090 JCC Roads; Chapter 18.35 Article IV JCC Short Subdivisions. The applicable criteria and requirements are discussed below. 4. The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Rural Residential Land Use Policy LNP 3.3 states: "Rural residential densities shown on the Land Use Map shall be designated by three (3) residential land use densities: one dwelling unit per five (5) acres, one dwelling unit per ten (10) acres, and one dwelling unit per twenty (20) acres in size and subject to the following criteria: LNP 3.3.2: A rural residential land use designation of one dwelling unit per 10 acres (RR 1:10) shall be assigned to those areas throughout the County with: a. an established pattern of the same or similar sized parcels(i.e., 10 acres); b. parcels along the coastal area of similar size; c. areas serving as a"transition"adjacent to Urban Growth Areas; and, d. critical area land parcels. The parcel is a legal conforming lot consisting of 34.54 acres and zoned RR 1:10. There are a variety of parcel sizes ranging from 68.43-acres that is owned by the State Park and Recreation to 9 and 5-acre parcels to tracts that are just over an acre in size. Baldwin Road runs parallel to the western boundary and Disney Road runs parallel to the northern property boundary while the shoreline of Admiralty Inlet was parallel to the southeast property line. Approval of this Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA12-00141/SUB12-000l I Page 3 of20 subdivision request is consistent with the mapped zoning designation of RR 1:10 and the surrounding parcels. To create an additional lot within the county continues to have a sufficient variety of rural densities as it has legislatively created RR 1:5; RR1:10 and RR1:20 zones and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Policy. 5. The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Rural Residential Land Use Policy LNP 14.1 states: "Ensure that land use decisions are based on land use ordinances which are in compliance with the Critical Areas Ordinance and all applicable state and federal environmental laws." Proposed Lot 1 has two existing single family residences, out buildings,two septic permits, and two wells. Proposed Lots 2 & 3 will have its own individual on-site septic systems and will be connected to PUD public water. The entire parcel is located within a SARPA aquifer recharge area. The original house was constructed in the early 1900's and is served by SEP03-63 for designation of a reserve drainfield only. An accessory dwelling unit (ADU) was constructed in 2003 (BLD03-188) and is served by septic permit number SEP03-64. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures at this time. Future permits will be reviewed by the county to assure the greatest protection of the aquifer recharge area. The east one-third of the parcel is located within an "at-risk" SIPZ and the west two-thirds of the parcel is located within a "coastal" SIPZ. The proposed lots are located within the PUD Quimper public water supply area and the water lines and meters will be installed prior to final plat approval and be graphically portrayed on the face of the final mylar. The existing wells will be decommissioned. Therefore, the proposal will not have an impact on the salt water protection zones as identified on the county GIS mapping. The area adjacent to the shoreline is identified as being seismic. Future development will be located landward of the surveyed wetland and its buffer that runs parallel with the shoreline on all three proposed lots. Future development will be located well outside the seismic zone. Building plans will be reviewed for the specific seismic zone and foundations A category III wetland was delineated on the subject parcel that spans all three proposed lots. The wetland will require a 60-foot natural buffer. The final survey mylar will graphically depict the wetland and its buffer. Future permit review will assure that development will occur outside of the wetland and its buffer. The surveyor shall be responsible for surveying the wetland and its associated 60-foot wide buffer and graphically depict it on the face of the final plat. No other critical areas were identified on site. 6. The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Transportation Policy LNP 17.1 states: Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLAl2-00141/SUB12-00011 Page 4 of20 "Encourage development and land use proposals that utilize existing transportation systems and provide non-motorized transportation opportunities." Baldwin Road runs parallel to the western property boundary and Disney Road runs parallel to the northern property Y bound�Y• Proposed Lot 1 has direct access from Baldwin Road and proposed Lots 2 and 3 will have direct access from Disney Road. According to the Transportation section in the Comprehensive Plan, a future bike route is proposed on SR 116(Flagler Road). Provision of a second access to the site from the public road system is not necessary. 7. Chapter 18.30.030 JCC Water Supplies: "When the development or redevelopment of land requires the availability of a supply of potable water as determined by the Administrator, potable water shall be delivered by a means approved by the Washington Department of Health and/or Jefferson County Health and Human Services." There are two existing wells that serve the two parcels within this short plat. All existing wells must be labeled "not approved for potable water supply" and state the intended use of the wells. If the wells are unusable (as defined by WAC 173-160-381) they shall be decommissioned in accordance with WAC 173-160-381 and comply with Jefferson County Health Department Policy Statement 96-02. The wells shall be labeled with the unique ID number or well tag, if available. Water meters and water lines to serve each parcel must be installed to meet the requirements per JCC 18.35.130(1)(b). The water meters and water line locations as installed shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final mylar. 8. Chapter 18.30.040 Sewage Disposal: "All development shall be provided with an individual, on-site septic system and drainfield approved by the Jefferson County Health Department in compliance with Chapter 8.15 JCC, unless the Jefferson County Health Department determines that public sewer is available which would then require connection to the approved public sewer." There are two existing septic permits on the subject parcel; SEP03-64 which is for a reserve drainfield for the southern house of Lot 1 and SEP03-63 is for an EES also on Lot 1 that serves the northern most home. Each septic system requires an 0 & M inspection prior to final plat approval. A site visit of the soil logs for Lots 2 & 3 indicates that there are suitable soils on site for an on-site septic system. Soil logs and their applicable soil log number shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final mylar. 9. Chapter 18.30.080 JCC Roads: "Roads providing access to or within the subdivision shall be constructed to the standards of Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA 12-00141/SUB 12-0001 I Page 5 of 20 the Department of Public Works. Public Works road design standards require provision of a 20 foot wide clear zone." Access to Proposed Lot 1 is from Baldwin Road which has been constructed with a 16 foot width for a distance of 1, 056 feet. There is an additional +/-2 foot wide grassed shoulders on each side. There is a 15 foot wide right-of-way on the subject parcel that was obtained in 1935; it extends 600 feet south from E. Marrowstone Road to the access to the original residence on Lot 1. There is not right-of-way for Baldwin Road on the proposal site beyond this point. There is a 30 foot wide right-of-way on the adjoining parcels to the west in Section 8 that was obtained in 1959; it extends +/-1,284 feet from E. Marrowstone Road to the south line of Section 8. This right-of-way provides access to 6 parcels that were subsequently created by short plats. There are two existing residences on Proposed Lot 1. The proposal won't change the use or traffic volume on Baldwin Road which appears to be adequate to accommodate the existing traffic. The dedication of additional right-of-way should not be required. Access to Proposed Lots 2 & 3 is via Disney Road, a private road on a 20 foot wide easement that serves 14 existing parcels. It's 419 feet from E. Marrowstone Road to the boundary of Lot 3 and approximately 660 feet to the point where Disney Road crosses a drainage ditch. Physical access to Lot 3 would most likely occur beyond this second point. Disney Road at the E. Marrowstone Road intersection is 18 feet wide. The initial +/-450 foot segment of Disney Road which extends to Lot 3 is 12 feet wide. Beyond this point there is an additional 6 foot to 8 foot wide grassed shoulder on the southerly side which allows vehicles to pass by driving on the shoulder. There is adequate visibility to see from the E. Marrowstone Road intersection to Lot 3. The segment of Disney Road that serves Lots 2 and 3 is adequate to serve the proposed two additional lots. Due to the configuration of the County Road system, it is not feasible to provide a second access to the site from a County Road. The existing road system is adequate to provide fire and emergency vehicle access and protect public safety. The proposed subdivision would add very small number of vehicles trips to Disney Road. It is adequate to serve the proposal provided that there are turnarounds for fire and emergency vehicles. This can be achieved if the initial 30 foot segment of the driveways from Disney Road to Lots 2 and 3 have a 20 foot width constructed with a minimum compacted thickness of 6 inches gravel base and 2 inches crushed rock. The following notice shall be placed under Notice to Potential Purchasers on the face of the final plat: • In order to provide an adequate turnaround for fire and emergency vehicles, the initial 30 foot segment of the driveway from Disney Road to the residences on Lots 2 and 3 shall have a minimum 20 foot width and a minimum 6 inches compacted gravel base and 2 inches compacted crushed rock. Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA12-00141/SUB12-00011 Page 6 of 20 10. Chapter 18.30.080(1)m JCC Roads: "Easements for private roads providing access to and/or internal circulation within subdivisions shall be 60 feet in width. Easement width may be reduced on the recommendation of the Department of Public Works based on a finding that the public health, safety, and welfare will be protected and that the easement width is adequate for the construction and maintenance of roads and utilities. Where reduced access easement widths are proposed, parallel utilities easements may be required." Access to Proposed Lot 1 is from Baldwin Road which has been constructed with a 16 foot width for a distance of 1, 056 feet. There is an additional +/-2 foot wide grassed shoulders on each side. There is a 15 foot wide right-of-way on the subject parcel that was obtained in 1935; it extends 600 feet south from E. Marrowstone Road to the access to the original residence on Lot 1. There is not right-of-way for Baldwin Road on the proposal site beyond this point. There is a 30 foot wide right-of-way on the adjoining parcels to the west in Section 8 that was obtained in 1959; it extends +/-1,284 feet from E. Marrowstone Road to the south line of Section 8. This right-of-way provides access to 6 parcels that were subsequently created by short plats. Access to Proposed Lots 2 & 3 is via Disney Road, a private road on a 20 foot wide easement that serves 14 existing parcels. It's 419 feet from E. Marrowstone Road to the boundary of Lot 3 and approximately 660 feet to the point where Disney Road crosses a drainage ditch. Physical access to Lot 3 would most likely occur beyond this second point. Disney Road at the E. Marrowstone Road intersection is 18 feet wide. The initial +/-450 foot segment of Disney Road which extends to Lot 3 is 12 feet wide. Beyond this point there is an additional 6 foot to 8 foot wide grassed shoulder on the southerly side which allows vehicles to pass by driving on the shoulder. There is adequate visibility to see from the E. Marrowstone Road intersection to Lot 3. The segment of Disney Road that serves Lots 2 and 3 is adequate to serve the proposed two additional lots. The Public Works Department does not require additional dedication of rights-of-ways for either Baldwin Road or Disney Road. 11. Chapter 18.30.080(1)n JCC Roads: "Access easements from the County Road system to the subdivision shall be provided consistent with the requirements of this Code. Access from the public road system shall be depicted on the final plat." Baldwin Road, Disney Road, and East Marrowstone Road shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final plat. All easements of records shall be graphically portrayed on the final plat with the Auditor's File Number(AFN)of the easements also reference on the face of the plat. 12. Chapter 18.30.080(1)p JCC Roads: "Subdivisions shall establish an agreement for the continuing maintenance of private roads Report prepared:February II,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA 12-00141/SUB I2-0001 1 Page 7 of 20 either by recording a separate instrument and referencing said instrument on the plat or by declaring a maintenance agreement on the plat. The applicant shall submit the maintenance agreement to the Department of Public Works for review and approval prior to final plat approval." Lots 2 and 3 would be accessed from E. Marrowstone Road by Disney Road, a private road that serves 14 existing parcels. There is not a road maintenance agreement for Disney Road. It would not be equitable to require the owners of Lots 2 and 3 to be responsible for the maintenance of Disney Road in the absence of a requirement for the other property owners to participate. The following notice shall be placed under Notice to Potential Purchasers: • Disney Road is a private road. There is not a road maintenance agreement for Disney Road. 13. Chapter 18.35.130(a) "Short subdivisions shall be given preliminary approval, including preliminary approval subject to conditions, upon finding by the administrator that all of the following have been satisfied: (1) The proposed subdivision conforms to all applicable county, state and federal zoning, land use, environmental and health regulations and plans, including, but not limited to the following: i. The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan: and ii. The provisions of this Code, including any incorporated standards; (2) Utilities and other public services necessary to serve the needs of the proposed subdivision shall be made available, including open spaces, drainage ways, roads, streets and other public ways, potable water, transit facilities, sewage disposal, parks, playgrounds, schools, sidewalks, and other improvements to assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school. (3) Approving the proposed short subdivision will serve the public use and interest and adequate provision has been made for the public health, safety and general welfare. Based on the previous findings, the proposal is found to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 18 of the Jefferson County Code and the Jefferson County Coordinated Water System Plan. Provisions for open spaces, drainage ways, streets/roads, alleys/other public ways, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, and parks and recreation have previously been addressed. The site is not within the vicinity of Jefferson Transit bus routes. The site is within the Chimacum School District. Based on current policy of the school district, students living within the site boundaries would not be required to walk to school. Bus service would be provided under the current policy of the Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA12-00141/SUB12-00011 Page 8 of20 district. There is no probable significant adverse environmental impact. The public interest would be served by the division of the 34.54-acre parcel into three lots intended for recreational/residential use. Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLAI2-00141/SUB12-00011 Pagc 9 of 20 MAUNEY/ROGERSON SHORT PLAT PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS: 1. All easements of record shall be graphically portrayed on the final plat with the Auditor's File Number (AFN) of the easement(s) also referenced on the face of the plat. 2. East Marrowstone Road, Baldwin Road and Disney Road shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final mylar. 3. The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": • In order to provide adequate turnaround for fire and emergency vehicles,the initial 30 foot segment of the driveway from Disney Road to the residences on Lots 2 and 3 shall have a minimum 20 foot width with a minimum 6 inches compacted gravel base and 2 inches compacted crushed rock. 4. The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": • Disney Rod is a private road. There is not a road maintenance agreement for Disney Road. 5. Existing addresses shall be verified for accuracy and consistency with the 911 Emergency Locator System Ordinance and if corrections to addresses are required, they shall be made prior to final plat approval. 6. Address plates for the lots shall be located in accordance with the provisions of the Jefferson County 911 Emergency Locator System Ordinance. 7. In accordance with the Jefferson County Fee Schedule Ordinance,the Public Works Department charges an hourly fee for application and plan reviews, project inspections, meetings, hearings, and final review. The proponent shall pay all fees incidental to the proposal prior to final approval. In the event that approval for the proposal is denied by Jefferson County or the proponent does not complete the proposal, the proponent shall still be responsible for paying the Department's fees. The Department's fee is currently $79 per hour. 8. The proponent shall submit a blue line copy of the site plan and lot closure information prepared by a licensed surveyor to the Department for review. The proponent shall make any corrections or additions prior to final approval. 9. After all preliminary plat conditions are met; the proponent shall submit a final mylar of the plat to the Department for approval by the Director of Public Works. HEALTH DEPARTMENT: 10. The location of the soil test pits and corresponding test pit number shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final plat. Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA 12-00141/SUB 12-00011 Page 10 of 20 11. Resolve the issue of the location of the reserved drainfield site for the northern most home permitted under SEP03-00063. Requires one of the following: • Make application to re-designate the reserve drainfield area; septic designer required, or • Adjust the proposed property line. 12. Show the reserve drainfield area for the southern most home permitted under SEP03- 00064. 13. Each septic system must have a current Operation& Maintenance inspection. 14. All existing wells must be labeled "not approved for potable water supply" and state the intended use of the wells. If the wells are unusable (as defined by WAC 173-160-381) they shall be decommissioned in accordance with WAC173-160-381 and comply with Jefferson County Health Department Policy Statement 96-02. 15. Label the wells with the unique ID number on the well tag, if available. 16. Water meters and water lines to serve each parcel shall be installed to meet the requirements of Jefferson County Code (JCC) 18.35.130(1)(b). The meters and/or water line locations as installed shall be graphically depicted on the face of the final mylar. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION: 17. Based on requirements of Chapter 18.35 JCC Final Short Plat, the final mylar shall be prepared in accordance with the final short plat checklist. A copy of Chapter 18.35 JCC is attached. 18. An accurate vicinity map shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final plat. 19. The final blue line shall depict the name of the subdivision and the county assigned number of SUB12-00011/MLA12-00141 on all sheets of the mylar. 20. The distance of 1302.32 shown on the north line of the proposed short plat does not include the road. However, the dashed line showing the beginning and the ending points of the distance indicates that it does include the road. 21. All existing structures shall be accurately labeled as to their current use. 22. Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48 RCW, Water Pollution Control and WAC 173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, and is subject to enforcement action. 23. Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent stormwater runoff from carrying soil and other pollutants into surface water or storm drains that lead to waters of the state. Sand, silt, clay particles, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered to be pollutants. 24. During construction, all releases of oils, hydraulic fluids, fuels, other petroleum products, paints, solvents, and other deleterious materials must be contained and removed in a manner that will prevent their discharge to waters and soils of the state. Cleanup of spills should take precedence over other work on the site. 25. Clearing limits and/or any easements or required buffers shall be identified and marked in the field prior to the start of any clearing, grading, or construction. Some suggested methods are staking and flagging or high visibility fencing. Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLAl2-00141/SUB12-00011 Page 11 of20 26. A permanent vegetative cover shall be established on denuded areas at final grade if they are not otherwise permanently stabilized. 27. Properties adjacent to the site of a land disturbance shall be protected from sediment deposition through the use of buffers or other perimeter controls, such as filter fence or sediment basins. 28. All temporary erosion control systems shall be designed to contain the runoff from the developed two year, 24-hour design storm without eroding. 29. Provision shall be made to minimize the tracking of sediment by construction vehicles onto paved public roads. If sediment is deposited, it should be cleaned every day by shoveling or sweeping. Water cleaning should only be done after the area has been shoveled or swept. 30. Wash water from paint and wall finishing equipment shall be disposed of in a way which will not adversely impact waters of the state. Untreated disposal of this wastewater is a violation of State Water Quality laws and statutes and, as such, would be subject to enforcement action. 31. This project may require a construction stormwater permit (also known as National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and State Waste Discharge General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction). This permit is required for projects which meet both of the following conditions: a. One or more acres of soil surface area will be disturbed by construction activities. b. The site already has off-site discharge to waters of the state or storm drains or will have off-site discharge during construction. An application with instructions can be downloaded from Ecology's website at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/stormwater/construction/ - Application. Construction site operators must apply for a permit at least 60 days prior to discharging stormwater. 32. A minimum 60 foot wetland buffer width shall be applied to the Category III wetland. Wetland buffer widths shall be measured along a horizontal line perpendicular to the wetland boundary. The buffer shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final mylar 33. The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": • Wetland buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. • A permanent physical separation along the upland boundary of the wetland buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. • Wetland buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred (100) feet, whichever is less. Signs shall be in place prior to and during construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Buffer- Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." • All construction activities shall not encroach upon the wetland buffers. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. • Lighting from any source shall be directed away from the wetland buffers. 34. An updated plat certificate or supplement shall be submitted with the final blueline and shall be 30 days current. Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLAl2-00141/SUB12-00011 Page 12of20 35. Certificates for the Board of County Commissioners, Clerk of the Board, Director of the Department of Public Works, Department of Community Development Administrator and Environmental Health Department need to be added. 36. Utilities and transportation facilities should be installed in the same rights-of-way when the effect will be to reduce the adverse impacts on the physical environment. 37. The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": • Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire safety, health or sanitary hazard. • Not more than 2 unlicensed vehicles shall be stored on any lot unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC. Outdoor storage of 3 or more junk motor vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an automobile wrecking yard or junk (or salvage)yard and allowed as a permitted use in Table 3-1 or Chapter 18.18 JCC, and such storage shall meet the requirements of JCC 18.20.100, Automobile wrecking yards and junk(or salvage) yards. In no case, shall any such junk motor vehicles be stored in a critical area. 38 The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": • Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet(20') in height from the finished grade excepting when such lighting is an integral part of building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. • Exterior lighting shall be energy efficient and shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflections are contained within the boundaries of the parcel. • Exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights-of-way. No lighting shall blink, flash, or be of unusually high intensity or brightness. • All lighting fixtures shall be appropriate in scale, intensity, and height to the use they are serving. 39. The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under"Notice to Potential Purchasers": • Maximum building height shall not exceed 35 feet. • Maximum impervious surface coverage shall not exceed 25%. • Minimum setbacks from Baldwin Road and Disney Road rights-of-ways shall be 20 feet. Minimum side yard setbacks shall be 5 feet. 40. The following notices shall be placed on the final plat under "Notice to Potential Purchasers": Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA12-00141/SUB12-00011 Page 13 of20 • Any further subdivision of the lots within this plat will be subject to the densities permitted in the Jefferson County Ordinances and Codes in effect at time of such application. These lots may or may not be further subdivided in the future. • Approval of this subdivision does not constitute approval of building or sewage disposal permits on each lot. Permit approval will be subject to building lot plans, type of use, contours, and soils on individual lots. Permits will be reviewed in accordance with site conditions and regulations existing on the date the permits are applied for. • Any removal of or major disturbance of soil within the proposed drainfield areas may create site conditions that are unacceptable of the installation of sewage disposal systems. 41. Consistent with RCW 84.56.345, current year and, if applicable, all delinquent property taxes including compensating tax from open space program shall be paid in full prior to the Treasurer signing the mylar and paper copies of the short plat. 42. The applicant must submit a reproducible copy plus seven(7)paper copies of the proposed final short plat to the Department of Community Development. The proposed final short shall contain elements as described in Chapter 18.35.120 JCC and shall include certifications and other requirements as provided in Chapter 18.35.190 JCC and 18.35.370 JCC. NOTICE: The sale of lots prior to final short plat approval is unlawful. EXPIRATION: Preliminary approval will expire on February 12, 2016. The Department of Community Development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of impending preliminary short plat expiration. SUBMISSION: It is the responsibility of the applicant or authorized representative to ensure the final short plat is submitted in accordance with the conditions of preliminary approval. This includes paying all property taxes and submitting a recording fee for the final plat and supply an updated plat certificate (within 30 days of submittal), all of which is outlined in the final short plat checklist. Report prepared:February 11,2013 Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat MLA 12-00141/SUB 12-00011 Page 14 of 20 Colleen Zmolek From: Susan Porto Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 3:50 PM To: Colleen Zmolek Subject: Mauney SUB12-11 blue line comments. recieved 11/20/13 Colleen, My comment regarding potable water for the most recently received survey in reference to the Mauney/Rogerson Trust Short Plat are as follows: • On sheet 3, Notice to Potential Purchasers,#14. Please modify the language to state: Potable water is to be served to each parcel by the Quimper Water System. The existing wells shown on the plat are intended for irrigation only. No water quality or quantity information for these wells were submitted for review. The 100' sanitary control area for the wells shall be protected from potential sources of contamination such as the rest can remain as stated If you have any questions let me know. S susaw.Porto R..S. Jef fersow Gouwttt Pui0Li,e Health Phowe 360. 3859404 FAX 360. 3.79.448Y- Alw& js worki.wg-for a safer Heatttii.erJef fersow eouwtj CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message,including any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,use,disclosure,or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT NOTICE: All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is exempt from disclosure under state law,including RCW 42.56. 1 OFFICE OF THE JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR Jack Westerman III,Assessor November 22, 2013 Colleen, RE: MLA12-00141 Manuney After reviewing this proposed action, I have the following comment(s): 1. The title on the Short Plat needs to read Mauney/Rogerson Trust Short Plat (not Short Plat for Mauney/Rogerson Trust), I am assuming that the final name is what is shown on the face of survey. 2. I have also run the lot closures using the coordinates from the lot closure sheet provided and do not have any issues with the lot closures (Monte-my resulting closure error varied slightly from the closure sheet— probably a rounding issue between my program and theirs— but not enough to cause any problems). 3. The parcel numbers need to be removed. Once these corrections are accomplished, we are satisfied with this transaction. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thanks, Pat&Sherrie (this is a comment collaboration from both of us) Pat Perryman (36o)385-9222 (360)385-9365 pperryman@co.jefferson.wa.us �4��5°N cOO� Donna M. Eldridge JEFFERSON COUNTY AUDITOR � 4 P.O.BOX 563,PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 1SNINrC� E-MAIL:deldridge@co.jefferson.wa.us (360)385-9118 Recording(360)385-9116 To: Cp6in'\ From: Bonnie Swafford (Si Brenda Huntingford Subject: Review of Plat Date: 3 PLAT NAME m&.Um,k ( E 4gflrSCv TY - 3101'f- P(c Recording Fee for Long & Short Plats, Condo, & Large Lot.....$138.00 Recording Fee for Conditions, Restrictions, and Covenants Recording Fee for Easement ** Recording Fee for Agreement **All easements must go through the Treasurer before recording. Remember to cross reference Auditor File Numbers with plat and documents pertaining to plat(i.e. Road Maintenance Agreement, CC&R's, Water Agreements, Easements, etc.). Notes: 11/\-1- (. r - to hA.vt (�ho Ffl — o.( Coax►-L to 1ti..R p of - r► P. i f 1Sl,elul ►,-e ) Mo►, / ReilecJ5v) Shy+ Via...._ �..;.� Bonnie Swafford) Brenda Huntingford Accounting Elections Licensing Recording FAX 385-9121 385-9117 385-9115 385-9116 385-9228 (11- or coG JEFFERSON COUNTY % DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street I Port Townsend,WA 983681 Web:www.co.iefferson.wa.us/communitvdevelooment �r Noce$ Tel:360.379.44501 Fax: 360,379.4451 Email:dcd(1a.co.jefferson.waus Building Permits&Inspections I Development Consistency Review I Long Range Planning I Watershed Stewardship Resource Center November 19, 2013 TO: Jefferson County Auditor's Office'btlCVv€ FROM: Development Review Division SUBJECT: Final Plat Review: SUB12-00011 Subdivision Type: SPA Applicant: MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE Subdivision Name: MAUNEY/ROGERSON TRUST SHORT PLAT REQUEST FOR REVIEW FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL ATTACHED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND COMMENT IS A COPY OF THE: (" Blue Line Road Maintenance Agreement CC & Rs Total Recording Fee $ Other PLEASE SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BY OR BEFORE November 26, 2013. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. THANK�YOU " ` IN ADVANCE. � ■ November 19,2013 \tidemark ldatalforms\F_SU B_PltRvw_Auditor.rp t Colleen Zmolek From: Eric Kuzma Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 11:00 AM To: Colleen Zmolek Subject: SUB12-00011 Hi Colleen, I have reviewed the Mauney/Robertson Final Short Plat. M LA12-00141/SUB 12-00011 All Public Works conditions have been met. At this time I don't seem to have the security level to sign off in Tidemark.... Eric Eric Kuzma,Engineer III Jefferson County Department of Public Works 623 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 Ph:360.385.9167 Fax:360.385.9234 Email: ekuzma(a),co.iefferson.wa.us Web: www.co.jefferson.wa..us/publicworks - N o &Arneo35 _ N. ' +,,Nnn.e. `PG. ; e-- Nakor9 — e NcK VszAz - — � 1 Colleen Zmolek From: Randy Marx Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 7:30 PM To: Colleen Zmolek Cc: Susan Porto Subject: SUB12-11, Mauney I have reviewed the blue line and have no further comments regarding septic, I signed off the final review activity in tidemark, is this new? Seems like I should have waited to sign that one off till the Mylar since that is the final?? Whatever I am good at this point. I routed the whole SUB file to Susan as I see water is pending Rased* 7tt Always Working For a Safer& Healthier Jefferson County 360 385 9402 ><((((°> ><K(" ><( ((� ><((((°> ><((((°> >< ><{{{"> u»<> ><((((> Septic Permits Online (Link) Environmental Health Web Site (Link) CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: his e Mail nc:u.sing any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended redi,e i(si,rd,na, arid dnv.ieged information. Any unauthorized review,use,disclosure,or distribution is prohibited, If you are not the intended recipient,please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message PUBLIC RECORDS ACT NOTICE: All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the letterson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found:jt RCW 4256. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail sinless it is exempt from disclosure under state law,including RCW 4256. 1 • January 21, 2014 TO: Department of Public Works FROM: Development Review Division SUBJECT: Final Plat Review: SUB12-00011 Subdivision Type: SPA Applicant: MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE Subdivision Name: MAUNEY/ROGERSON TRUST SHORT PLAT REQUEST FOR REVIEW FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL ATTACHED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND COMMENT IS A COPY OF THE: Blue Line Road Maintenance Agreement Lot Closures f Mylar-Pltzwzo_. kc-ern fl C (12 C.3-\Q,.i/3 PLEASE SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BY OR BEFORE January 28, 2014. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE. • I t o a.-621- DC 1� 1 January 21,2014 \tidemark\data\forms\F_SU B_P ItRvw_P u b Wo rk .rpt C--j\-9jA RgON RECEIPT NUMBER 2.. JEFFERSON COUNTY TREASURER 633497 P.O. BOX 571 DATE -< 1820 JEFFERSON ST. 1/27/2014 PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 Phone: Fax: (360)385-9149 Duplicate copy SNINGC WWW.CO.JEFFERSON.WA.US Paid Bv: MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE LYNNE ROGERSON TRUSTEE MAUNEY/ROGERSON REV LIV T 2133 OAK BAY RD PORT HADLOCK,WA 98339-9778 Property ID Geo ID Type Year Statement Base Penlint Total 23256 921094026 Escrow 2014 18.549.14 0.00 18,549.14 Subtotal: 18,549.14 0.00 18,549.14 Total: 18 549.14 0.00 18 549.14 Payment Type: Payment Check 6087 18,549.14 Payment Code: Full Payment Total Paid : 18,549.14 Operator Batch <TCASH> <2599>-TCASH 01-27-2014 For Property Tax Information,please visit our website at:WWW.CO.JEFFERSON.WA.US Payment Receipt Report Page 1 of 1 True Automation,Inc. January 16, 2014 TO: Environmental Health Department FROM: Development Review Division SUBJECT: Final Plat Review: SUB12-00011 Subdivision Type: SPA Applicant: MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE Subdivision Name: MAUNEY/ROGERSON TRUST SHORT PLAT REQUEST FOR REVIEW FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL ATTACHED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND COMMENT IS A COPY OF THE: Blue Line Certification for sewer line extension Certification for water system expansion rr Other P(.12 ten. scc r. CYl N C s l0 Cep 42-5 PLEASE SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BY OR BEFORE January 23, 2014. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE. 1 January 16,2014 l tidemark\data lformslF_SUB_PltRvw_Health.rpt 5ye, 1A-5 / 11\ ,( I" Colleen Zmolek From: Colleen Zmolek Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 4:05 PM To: 'Terry McHugh' Subject: Mauney/ Rogerson Short Plat Final comments Attachments: Auditor's comments.pdf; Assessor's comments.pdf Hi Terry, Regarding the Mauney & Rogerson Short Plat when I routed the blue line and received the following comments. All comments will need to be address on the final mylar. Attached are the Assessor &Auditor comments. On November 25, 2013, Susan Porto, Environmental Health Water, commented as follows: My comment regarding potable water for the most recently received survey in reference to the Mauney/Rogerson Trust Short Plat are as follows: • On sheet 3, Notice to Potential Purchasers, #14. Please modify the language to state: Potable water is to be served to each parcel by the Quimper Water System. The existing wells shown on the plat are intended for irrigation only. No water quality or quantity information for these wells were submitted for review. The 100' sanitary control area for the wells shall be protected from potential sources of contamination such as ........the rest can remain as stated On December 17, 2013, Randy Marx, Environmental Health Septic had no further comments: • I have reviewed the blue line and have no further comments regarding septic On November 23,2013, Eric Kuzma, Public Works had no further comment: • I have reviewed the Mauney/Robertson Final Short Plat. MLA12-00141/SUB12-00011. All Public Works conditions have been met. Thes e are my comments: y co a is: • Sheet 1 of the plat all dates need to be changed to 2014. DCD preliminary date need to be changed to "on the 12 day of February" It currently says the 2nd which is incorrect. • Sheet 3; Notice to Potential Purchasers note 15 if not applicable please remove from the plat or submit the recorded document and have it referenced on the mylar. • Updated subdivision certificate. • All taxes must be paid for 2014 • Submit 1 mylar and 6 copies to be recorded • Submit $138 for recording fees and have the check made out to Jefferson County Auditor's office. The mylar and the 6 copies will be routed for all departments signatures. After the departments have signed the mylar it is placed on consent agenda and is sent for BOCC approval and signatures. Upon BOCC approval I will take to the Auditor's office for recording. Thank you, 1 CoCCeen Zmo[ek Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4462 czmolek(a�co.iefferson.wa.us ..17.12,71. 11/ f F F f ■ S O IF C 0 U N 1 Y WATERSHED STEWARDSHIP RESOURCE CENTER Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Our office is open to the public 9:0o a.m.—4:3o p.m.Monday to Thursday,closed Fridays. 2 OFFICE OF THE JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR Jack Westerman ill,Assessor November 22, 2013 Colleen, RE: MLA12-00141 Manuney After reviewing this proposed action, I have the following comment(s): 1. The title on the Short Plat needs to read Mauney/Rogerson Trust Short Plat (not Short Plat for Mauney/Rogerson Trust), I am assuming that the final name is what is shown on the face of survey. 2. I have also run the lot closures using the coordinates from the lot closure sheet provided and do not have any issues with the lot closures (Monte-my resulting closure error varied slightly from the closure sheet- probably a rounding issue between my program and theirs - but not enough to cause any problems). 3. The parcel numbers need to be removed. Once these corrections are accomplished,we are satisfied with this transaction. If you have any questions or comments,please do not hesitate to contact me. Thanks, Pat&Sherrie (this is a comment collaboration from both of us) Pat Perryman (36o)385-9222 (36o)385-9365 pperryman@co.jefferson.wa.us ° 1 Donna M. Eldridge JEFFERSON COUNTY AUDITOR P.O.BOX 563.PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 /SpINt ti E-MAIL:dcldridge@co.jcffcrson.wa.us (360)385-9118 Recording(360)385-9116 To: C.,& '\ ‘kk ©C� From: Bonnie Swafford & Brenda Huntingford Subject: Review of Plat Date: 0 1 PLAT NAME Ow r,; I ( ' Sam 'Tij" \- )not Recording Fee for Long & Short Plats, Condo, & Large Lot.....$138.00 Recording Fee for Conditions, Restrictions, and Covenants Recording Fee for Easement ** Recording Fee for Agreement **All easements must go through the Treasurer before recording. Remember to cross reference Auditor File Numbers with plat and documents pertaining to plat(i.e. Road Maintenance Agreement, CC&R's, Water Agreements, Easements, etc.). Notes: U' ``� ' F�c; to 1n�c �, 414":4- 3(1--c�4' 4 (ll / t &kijfirai jl'�i Bonnie Swaffor Brenda Huntingford Accounting Elections Licensing Recording FAX 385-9121 385-9117 385-9115 385-9116 385-9228 November 20, 2013 TO: Environmental Health Department FROM: Development Review Division SUBJECT: Final Plat Review: SUB12-00011 Subdivision Type: SPA Applicant: MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE Subdivision Name: MAUNEY/ROGERSON TRUST SHORT PLAT REQUEST FOR REVIEW FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL ATTACHED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND COMMENT IS A COPY OF THE: Blue Line Certification for sewer line extension Certification for water system expansion Other PLEASE SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BY OR BEFORE November 27, 2013. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE. November 20,2013 \tidemark\d ata\fo rms1F_SUB_P ItRvw_Health.rpt JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE II LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA12-00141 APPLICANT: Affidavit of Publication MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE STATE OF WASHINGTON) LYNNE ROGERSON TRUSTEE 21330AK BAY RD SS Port Had lock COUNTY OF JEFFERSON) Application n Received Date:Rec June 19,2012 Application Complete Date: W. July 23,2012 I, Donna J. Rosmaier, an employee of the Port Townsend & Jefferson Application emb r 1 ,Notice Date: County Leader, a weekly newspaper which has been established, December 19,2012 � 5' SITE ADDRESS AND published in the English language and circulated continuously as a PROJECT LOCATION: 91 BALDWIN RD weekly newspaper in the town of Port Townsend in said County and Parcel number 921 094 026, Lot 1,in State, and for general circulation in said county for more than six (6) Section 9, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM,located on Baldwin Rd,Nordland,WA months prior to the date of first publication of the Notice hereto 98358-9608 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND attached and that the said Port Townsend & Jefferson County Leader REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: was on the 27th day of June 1941 approved as a legal newspaper by the Three (3) Lot Short Plat with SEPA: The proposal is to subdivide 34.54-acres Superior Court of said Jefferson County and annexed is a true copy of into three residential lots.Lot 1 will consist the Ad # • of 13.35-acres, Lot 2 will be 11.15-acres ,.f/1 q 7 • and Lot 3 will be 10.04 acres.Lot 1 has an existing single family residence and several detached out-buildings served by an on-she septic system and two on-site wells.Access to Lot 1 is via Baldwin Road. Lots 2 and 3 are • vacant and will be accessed by SEE ATTACHED NEWSPAPER CLIPPING Disney Road.The parcels are located within the Ouimper public water system and Lots 2 8 3 would be served by an on-site sep- tic system.A wetland has been identified on the parcel that spans all 3 of the proposed lots Develop- ment and requires lots a 60-foot buffer. id et. wetland As it appeared in the regular and entire issue of said paper itself not in moot of the lots will occur outside the wetland PP g P P and its associated buffer. a supplement thereof for a period of / weeks; beginning on the COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: )'/� Hi day of DeG.ern6 . , 2012, ending on the /94) day of The application and any studies may , 2012, that said newspaper was regularly distributed be reviewed at the Jefferson County Depart- ment of Community Development.All inter- to their subscribers during all of this period. That the full amount of ested persons are invited to (a) comment 13.43 has been paid in full, at the rate of$ 7.75 per column inch on the application;(b)receive notice of and $ P P participate in any hearings;and(c)receive a for each insertion. copy of the decision by submitting such writ- ten comment(s)Irequest(s)to the Jefferson County Department of Community Develop- Subscribed and sworn to before me this /4M day of I"4 4 L#I- 2013. ment, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend.WA 98368,OS M A/F9 (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to-.Nr - / Q•(o,� the Department by 4:30 p.m.on January 1� Donna osmaier 2,2013. If the last day of the comment pe- riod falls on a weekend or holiday,then the �0�, p Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at Port Townsend. comment period shall be extended to the first Ili- working day after the weekend or holiday. _C, Comments submitted after this dale may not ��\ A\ be considered in the staff report. . �V y SEPA INFORMATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197- r� 11.355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental a^( = impacts of the proposal. DP O E O V Project Planner:. Michelle Farfan, 360-379-4450. For further information,please visit the MAR 2 5 2013 Jefferson County Department of Community Development web page at www.co.jetferson. wa.usicommdevelopmenV 111197 12/19 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • _ i JEFFERSON TITLE COMPANY Jefferson Title Company 2205 Washington Street PO Box 256 Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone: (360)385-2000 Fax: (360)385-6967 SUPPLEMENTAL #2 TO THE SUBDIVISION CERTIFICATE Attention: This Supplemental contains changes which impact Title to Property set forth in the above referenced commitment. Prepared For: John L.Scott Real Estate Terry McHugh 2219 Sims Way Port Townsend, WA 98368 Commitment No.: 77664 Reference: Mauney Schedule`B" ® Paragraph 1 of the preliminary commitment is amended as follows: 1. General taxes for the year 2013 which have been paid. Amount: $ 15,500.11 Tax Account No.: 921 094 026 Property ID No.: 23256 Assessed value: $ 1,523,386.00 ® There has been no change in the title to the property covered by this order since June 17, 2013 at 8:00 A.M.,except the matters noted hereinabove. Dated as of December 26,2013 at 8:00 A.M. Jefferson Title Company By: Susan Brandt,Title Officer Colleen Zmolek From: Sabrina Hathaway Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 2:11 PM To: Colleen Zmolek Subject: RE: Mauney to pay taxes He would come to the treasurer's office to pay the taxes. The amount will be $18,594.14 If he asks how the figure is calculated: Current Assessed Value of 1,523,386 Times the 2013 levy rate of 10.17149 Which equals$15,495.11 Additional 20%_ $3,099.03 Brings the total to $18,594.14 Once the 2014 taxes are calculated we will refund or bill the difference. Sabrina Hathaway, Revenue Foreclosure Deputy Jefferson County Treasurer's Office PO Box 571 Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 385-9352 From: Colleen Zmolek Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 1:54 PM To: Sabrina Hathaway Subject: Mauney to pay taxes Hi Sabrina, Parcel number 921094026 is the one we discussed this morning. Mauney needs to pay the taxes for 2014 before the short plat can be finalled. Would he go to the Assessor's office before he come to the Treasurer's office to pay the taxes? Or does he even need to go to the Assessor's office? The survey will not be sent up to the CH for signatures until after the taxes have been paid. Thanks you, Colleen Zmolek Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4462 czmolek(c�co.iefferson.wa.u s 1 7411111/ 1 ( f R 5 0 M C O U N T Y 1 WATERSHED STEWARDSHIP RESOURCE CENTER Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Our office is open to the public 9:oo a.m.—4:3o p.m.Monday to Thursday,closed Fridays. 2 Colleen Zmolek From: Colleen Zmolek Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 11:29 AM To: Terry McHugh' Subject: FW: Mauney/ Rogerson Short Plat Final comments Attachments: Auditor's comments.pdf; Assessor's comments.pdf Hi Terry, I caught one more comment that needs to be corrected on the final mylar. • Acknowledgement: Should read County Jefferson NOT County of Clallam. CotTeen Zmo[ek Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4462 czmolek a()co.iefferson.wa.us i E F F E P S 0 0 C O O M t Y WATERSHED STEWARDSHIP RESOURCE CENTER Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Our office is open to the public 9:Oo a.m.—4:3o p.m.Monday to Thursday,closed Fridays. From: Colleen Zmolek Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 4:05 PM To: Terry McHugh' Subject: Mauney/ Rogerson Short Plat Final comments Hi Terry, Regarding the Mauney & Rogerson Short Plat when I routed the blue line and received the following comments. All comments will need to be address on the final mylar. Attached are the Assessor & Auditor comments. On November 25, 2013, Susan Porto, Environmental Health Water, commented as follows: My comment regarding potable water for the most recently received survey in reference to the Mauney/Rogerson Trust Short Plat are as follows: • On sheet 3, Notice to Potential Purchasers, #14. Please modify the language to state: Potable water is to be served to each parcel by the Quimper Water System. The existing wells shown on the plat are intended for irrigation only. No water quality or quantity information for 1 these wells were submitted for review. The 100' sanitary control area for the wells shall be protected from potential sources of contamination such as the rest can remain as stated On December 17, 2013, Randy Marx, Environmental Health Septic had no further comments: • I have reviewed the blue line and have no further comments regarding septic On November 23,2013, Eric Kuzma, Public Works had no further comment: • I have reviewed the Mauney/Robertson Final Short Plat. MLA12-00141/SUB12-00011. All Public Works conditions have been met. These are my comments: • Sheet 1 of the plat all dates need to be changed to 2014. DCD preliminary date need to be changed to "on the 12 day of February" It currently says the 2"d which is incorrect. • Sheet 3; Notice to Potential Purchasers note 15 if not applicable please remove from the plat or submit the recorded document and have it referenced on the mylar. • Updated subdivision certificate. • All taxes must be paid for 2014 • Submit 1 mylar and 6 copies to be recorded • Submit $138 for recording fees and have the check made out to Jefferson County Auditor's office. The mylar and the 6 copies will be routed for all departments signatures. After the departments have signed the mylar it is placed on consent agenda and is sent for BOCC approval and signatures. Upon BOCC approval I will take to the Auditor's office for recording. Thank you, Colleen Zmolek Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4462 czmolek(a�co.iefferson.wa.us " �1 E { i F P S 0 P C O S M T T I'f•• WATERSHED STEWARDSHIP -� RESOURCE CENTER Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Our office is open to the public 9:oo a.m.—4:3o p.m. Monday to Thursday,closed Fridays. 2 Jefferson County Assessor& Treasurer- Property Details -23256 MARC MAUNEY TR... Page 1 of 1 Jefferson County Assessor& Treasurer Property Search Results > 23256 MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE for Year 2013 - 2014 • Property Account Property ID: 23256 Legal Description: S9 129 R1 E LOT 1 SUBJ TO EASE Geographic ID: 921094026 Agent Code: Type: Real Tax Area: 0211 -1-49F1E1H2L1 Land Use Code 1100 Open Space: DFL Historic Property: N Remodel Property: N Multi-Family Redevelopment: N Township: Section: Range: Location Address: 91 BALDWIN RD Mapsco: NORDLAND,WA Neighborhood: SEC9,16,17T29R1E&STAVNEY,GARDEN CLUB ACRES,MORROW-OLIVA SP Map ID: Neighborhood CD: 3220 Owner Name: MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE Owner ID: 21831 Mailing Address: LYNNE ROGERSON TRUSTEE %Ownership: 100.0000000000% MAUNEY/ROGERSON REV LIV T 2133 OAK BAY RD PORT HADLOCK,WA 98339-9778 Exemptions: Taxes and Assessment Details Property Tax Information as of 12/13/2013 Amount Due if Paid on: E. NOTE: If you plan to submit payment on a future date,make sure you enter the date and click RECALCULATE to obtain the correct total amount due. Click on"Statement Details"to expand or collapse a tax statement. First Half Second Half Year Statement ID Base Amt. Base Amt. Penalty Interest Base Paid Amount Due Statement Details 2013 13214 $7750.11 $7750.00 $0.00 $0.00 $15500.11 $0.00 1 Statement Details 2012 232562011 $7449.25 $7449.15 $0.00 $0.00 514898.40 $0.00 Values Taxing Jurisdiction Improvement/Building Property Image Land Roll Value History Deed and Sales History Payout Agreement This year is not certified and ALL values will be represented with "N/A". Website version:9.0.32.2200 Database last updated on:12/13/2013 4:41 AM ®2013 True Automation,Inc.All Rights Reserved. Privacy Notice • • http://trueweb.j effcowa.us/propertyac ce ss/Property.aspx?cid=0&year=2013&prop_id=23... 12/13/2013 CLARK LAND SURVEYING 93�-�orthPifthAvenue • 1'0.Bor2199 MAPPING LAND segnlm, Washington 98382 DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING ������ Office(360) 681-2161 • Fax(360)683-5310 CONSTRICTION MANAGEMENT Toll Tree 1-888681-2161 • L-marl:infoCclar, landcom PLLC LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Jefferson Co. Dept. of Comm. Dev. Date: July 3, 2013 621 Sheridan Street Re: SUB12-00011/MLA12-00141 Port Townsend, Washington 98368 Final Mauney/Rogerson Trust Short Plat Enclosed are the following items: Copies Date Description 7 Review Copies of Final Mauney/Rogerson Trust Short Plat map(3 sheets)with 1 reduced copy 1 7/03/13 Lot Closures 1 6/17/13 Supplemental No. 1 to Subdivision Certificate Remarks: For Final Review and Approval. • Please feel free to call if you have any questions. Copies to: Signed Scot B. Clark, PLS 5U8/12-00011/MLA12-00141 SHORT PLAT FOR: MA UNE 1 Y/R O G ER S ON TR US T IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON APPROVALS: DESCRIPTION: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CERTIFICATE: GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE I I HEREBY CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THIS FINAL EAST, W.M., EXCEPT THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR A PUBLIC ROAD GRANTED TO JEFFERSON COUNTY OVER THE WEST 15 FEET OF ME NORTH 660 PLAT IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CERTIFICATE OF IMPROVEMENTS ISSUED FEET OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1, AS CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED PURSUANT TO THE JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE AND UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 75494, IN VOLUME 1 OF ROAD WAIVERS, IS CONSISTENT WITH ALL APPLICABLE COUNTY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS PAGE 548, RECORDS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON. AND REQUIREMENTS IN FORCE ON THE DATE OF PRELIMINARY PUT APPROVAL, THIS DAY OF , 2073. SITUATE IN COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF WASHINGTON. DIRECTOR, JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY ON THIS_DAY OF , 2013, THAT THIS FINAL PLAT IS IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND DECLARATION: B YJEFF CONDITIONS COUNTY ON THERE 200 WHICH 2012.WAS APPROVED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE', THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS OF THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED, DECLARE THIS PLAT TO BE CREATED BY OUR OWN FREE WILL AND CONSENT. WE ALSO GRANT TO THE LOT OWNERS WITHIN THIS PUT THE RIGHT TO USE THE EASEMENTS AS PLATTED FOR THE USES AND ADMINISTRATOR. JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PURPOSES SHOWN. MAUNEY/ROGERSON REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DIRECTOR'S CERTIFICATE MARC MAUNEY, TRUSTEE LYNNE ROGERSON, TRUSTEE APPROVED BY THE PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT ON THIS DAY OF . 2013. DIRECTOR, JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT' APPROVED BY THE JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS THIS DAY OF , 2013. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF CLALLAM ) CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT ON THIS DAY OF 2013, BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, DULY COMMISSIONED AND SWORN PERSONALLY APPEARED gafig ATTEST: CLERK OF THE BOARD MAUNEY AND LYNNE ROGERSON. AS TRUSTEES OF THE MAUNEY/ROGERSON REVOCABLE LMNG TRUST. WHO EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT THEY SIGNED THE SAME AS THEIR FREE AND COUNTY TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE: VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. ALL TAXES AND ANY DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS FOR WHICH THE LAND WITHIN THE LAND DIVISION MAY HE LIABLE HAVE BEEN DULY PAID AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 58.08.040 R.C.W. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RESIDING AT MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES JEFFERSON COUNTY TREASURER DEPUTY DATE COUNTY ASSESSOR'S APPROVAL: EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF . 2013. JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR ATTEST DEPUTY COUNTY ASSESSOR RECORDING CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY OF PORT TOWNSEND THIS SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: DAY OF 2013, AT MINUTES PAST_M., AND RECORDED IN VOLUME OF SHORT PUTS, PAGE THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY RECORDS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON. CONDUCTED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY RECORDING NUMBER . THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT. ME 58 RCN. dx .�L MANAGER B.0 - IIA3 .Q�, (�OV SUPERINTENDENT OF RECORDS v SHEET 7 OF 3 ,\' to,LV SCOT B. CLARK, PLS P C.e..2999 0'•``Q-IS1a 9T` L.S. NUMBER 36956 CLARK 935 N 511.Ave. 4L LANQ LAND SURVEYING * ,� 66p urn.WA 98382 DATE.' MAPPING .7 (760)661-2161 PLAT CHECK: SRC CONSTRUCTION CMANACEMENT OFFICE (666)661-1 c CRAM BY: JIB 1 SERA 01E2909-MAUNEY_SP_SASE-022012 SUB/12-0001 f/MLA12-00141 SHORT PLAT FOR: MA UNH1' Y/ROGERSON TRUST IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., 4 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON 1 ,17.\_ m;'+•' FOUND R CORNER FOUND 4"r 4"CONCRETE ry SION IN ALUMINUM CASE H 2° `3j (4/09/04) l CJ MOEN ROAD c,N CENTER OF SECTION 9 - FOUND CONC. MON IN ALUMINUM CASE. (1/23/09) NORTH LINE OF I 4R THE SE 1/4 '^ • I',41 I V1 N FOUND I 1/z'BRASS GP WITH PUNCH • • IN MONUMENT WELL. (1/23/09) MONUMENT LIES 509'31'11W, 2.79' • FROM TRUE 1/IETH CORNER EDGE OF GRAVEL 150 75 150 ROAD PER FIELD 58252'44 E' AES 1/10/11. %•••fF94'�=i ki i_ 7377.32' _ SCALE IN FEET Oro.wD iw sa3,IT F :: ` si ii a .[ro/117/x/ o METER SL-Sr DISNEY ROAD O /5' St-J0 DRAINAGE DITCH 20'---I DETAIL: o SL-2p� APPROX. AREA 5L-6 SCALE 1" 100' Le AE 0.72 ACRES. NORTH I Z u '#-1 T .�+ \ OF WETLAND AND t-Tt o \.. 3 e GOVT �D 'bS. \\ SOUTH OF ROAD. 5L-e I m Ao STORAGE' • SL-IS VC' \KA,531 PG. 109 ultA \ 437,507 sq. /f. 05t-9 I 57tED5 I SL-l4�r �--PEACE 20.9.E - SURD" 40 26 \ 10.04 acres CW k ?•` + �: �rr EDGE or GRAVEL%2 N 92109 60' WETlANO DRAINAGE DITCH ¢n I 1WO N ', "" /0, ROAD PER FIELD r BUFFER TYP. i- 4,21 ' 2 r` y TIES 2/20/12. / 3 W" I h Or ` SEPAL L#1 Ilik Y` -\/ Mf T ." 5L-27- / r IN ,N SEP cW LOT 2 /��\ \ 1 `� \ Nog I ' W p \\\ St-7J L" • 485,872 sq. fl.( -\ 7 3 V 1 \ 15' '�^ • r' /�'� 11.15 0c es II \ 1,,,...1 f T-�I�STORAGE SFE!7£7AR r L-,i 7 •i _ \ II I I SHEDS arcrroC FENCE i PROPANE TANK LA f1 L 1 / -, •` \ RSERVE AREA O i// -_ 1 1 �.9 \ ,.33.50' / 58753'31 E \ SEPUJ-63 a. .n, i "_, ti \.�i -- f LINE TABLE 75.00' ''® 1 '� 'n. I TOP OF ` LINE BEARING LENGTH WA( EKKTAW wets I =` ti / _ SLOPE / L7 N53'02.42E 79.47' \\ 1".. /(NO TAG1 LOT 1 I =`.``= ,V /� Y V"4 L1.3 L2 N4.5'39•'91- 6907' •J 581.584 SQ. ft I '` ` -` F // /� L3 NST(8'04E 98.11' EDGE OF ASPMUT N. 13175 acros 1 `=`== / t/bl L4 N50'30J7E 66.36' ROW PER rrELO \ N STORAGE �n `\� _ - i / 27.96' s. \0 L5 N50'30JlE 96.05' nes 2/20/72 . SHEDS /EKI50NL WEU\ y . . ,I / V LINE OF L6 N54'S530 E 62.53' / (ND TAG)W R' -* ti f DRAINAGE VEGETANON I WELL HOUSE \ // �' 1 I DITCH L7 N51'40JOT 91.82' RESIDENCE- I ® 1 I == , ,I So, / L8 N49'07'14"E 62.12' \ +\ / I �=i .` �' V� �( L9 N51'1075E 137.84' ^a \ D.� I '5- � _ 1 �• S L10 N54'76J1E 52.97' A / Lao i„r / - . .� ` / / V 1a1ES L I I N50'44'O3 E 92.70' e �, / `= 4 1 ,6 .0 ( .OPR s L12 N4EF4931 E 74.63' f)1RB£0 h EXISTING RESERVE AREA / - „ 1 ' U Or'0-05 L 1J N51'40'48"E 29.57' YORE FENCE 0 OSCRIMIELO SEPOJ-6A II `` _�is. yb P�Pµ011.0 'O \ 20.68' 'AP' s IC LEGEND: LEGEND:oe QUARTER CORNER n-n_ --/ `t� / • DENOTES SET 5/8"REBAR WITH PLASTIC SURVEY CAP STAMPED. FOUND 4". 4"CONC. 1..3 CLARK 38956" (5/06/13) MON WITH BROKEN PIN. 91 (2/20/72) \Oµ/V. LINE OF • DENOTES FOUND 5/8"REBAR WITH PLASTIC SURVEY CAP STAMPED.' 54751' �\ VEGETATION A_ WOOD 23911" (7/23/09) 16 58751'05"E 0 DENOTES FOUND 3/4"SO. IRON PIN. (5/06/13) / ALSO FOUND 5/8"REBAR& CAP / STAMPED: A. WOOD 23971" • DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND AND ACCEPTED AS NOTED. (1/23/09) N66'00'28E 0.61' O 43 DENOTES TEST PIT LOCATION PER JSF ENGINEERING (4/24/12) LEGEND: AWE DENOTES EXISTING WATER METER. DENOTES EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVEWAY '' "�'J VICINITY SC MAP ® NOT APPROVED EXISTING FOR WELL, NO ID TAG, BL FOR IRRIGATION ONLY PER FIELD TIES 1/I3/09. NO SCALE / „ �E NOT APPROVED FOR USE AS POTABLE WATER. ® R/GNOT EOF 20' DEED RECORDED 'p NOTES:EASEMENT AND r �.� DENOTES WETLAND PER FIELD TIES IlL 111 1. THIS SURVEY ON PERFORMED TOTAL BY FIELD TRAVERSE STEEL METHODS USING A 5 SECOND TOPCON GTS-235W TOTAL STATION AND STEEL TAPE. 17/28/12. till 2. FOR BASIS OF BEARING AND SECTION SUBOMSION DATA. SEE VOL. 7 OF SURVEYS. PAGE 101. RECORDS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY. WASHINGTON. ALSO $$ SEE UNRECORDED SURVEY BY J.T. LAY DATED MARCH 1948 ON FILE WITH THE JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE. is ii 3.WETLAND REPORT AND DELINEATION BY LOGGY SOIL AND WETLAND CONSULTING. B' 4. RESERVE AREA FOR DRAINFIELD SHOWN HEREON BY JSF ENGINEERING INC. �i��eA ��f• 1 0 77TLED "WASTEWATER SYSTEM PLAN"AND DATED 17/26/12. f/ V SHEET 2 OF 3 i V N.T.S. r0.eo.ar» AL ENt� CLARK�� 41 lit LAND 9>3 x 91 Aw. 'I �... LAND SURVEYING 1 Sewn WA 9636a RIr MAPPING (3ww1 bbt-3Ni RxAL CHECK: SBC \�' X DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING o GEE TAR 663-6316 PLAT CAECA: SBC SOBJECT CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT O +a�/�/ (°66)661-amt BRAWN BY: .5714 PROPERTY . 9(29N-1E) (- SERT 31E2909-MAVNEY_SP_BASE-022012 • /]�� SUB/12-0001r/MLA12-00141 SHORT PLAT FOR: MA UNE l Y/l d O GEl !�/7{�S ON TRUST T IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON NOTICE TO POTENTIAL PURCHASERS: NOTICE TO POTENTIAL PURCHASERS: I. THE LOTS, PARCELS OR TRACTS CONTAINED WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION WERE 73. WETLAND BUFFERS SHALL REMAIN NATURALLY VEGETATED. APPROVED BASED ON DESIGN STANDARDS AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF FINAL APPROVAL ONS/TE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS A PERMANENT PHYSICAL SEPERATION ALONG THE UPLAND BOUNDARY OF THE HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED FOR THE LOTS, PARCELS, OR TRACTS CONTAINED WITH WETLAND BUFFER AREA SHALL BE INSTALLED AND PERMANENTLY MAINTAINED. THIS SUBDIVISION. ON-SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS SHALL MEET DESIGN STANDARDS AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF WETLAND BUFFER PERIMETERS SHALL BE MARKED WITH TEMPORARY SIGNS AT APPLICATION FOR A SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT. PURCHASER SHOULD CONTACT THE INTERVALS OF ONE PER PARCEL OR EVERY ONE HUNDRED (100) FEET, WHICHEVER JEFFERSON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT FOR PROCEDURES IS LESS. SIGNS SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO AND DURING CONSTRUCTION CONCERNING PERMIT APPLICATIONS. ANY REMOVAL OF OR MAJOR DISTURBANCES ACTIVITIES. THE SIGNS SHALL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT: $OFFER-DO NOT OF SOIL WITHIN THE PROPOSED DRAINFIELO AREAS MAY CREATE SITE CONDITIONS REMOVE OR ALTER EXISTING VEGETATION'. THAT ARE UNACCEPTABLE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS. I. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE TURNAROUND FOR FIRE AND EMERGENCY ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL NOT ENCROACH UPON THE WETLAND BUFFERS. VEHICLES, THE INITIAL .50 FOOT SEGMENT OF THE DRIVEWAY FROM DISNEY ROAD THIS INCLUDES THE STORAGE OR PREPARATION OF MATERIALS. TO THE RESIDENCES ON LOTS 1 AND 3 SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 20 FOOT WIDTH LIGHTING FROM ANY SOURCE SHALL BE DIRECTED AWAY FROM THE WETLAND WITH A MINIMUM 6 INCHES COMPACTED GRAVEL BASE AND 2 INCHES OF BUFFERS. COMPACTED CRUSHED ROCK. IS A PRIVATE ROAD. THERE IS NOT A ROAD MAINTENANCE BE THE I00'SANITARY CONTROL AREA FOR THE INDIVIDUAL (IWO PARTY) WELLS SHALL 3. DISNEY ROAD AGREEMENT I FOR PRIVATE ROAD. BE PROTECTED FROM POTENTIAL SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION. SUCH AS SEPTIC TANKS AND DRAINFIELDS, SEWER LINES, UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS. PUBLIC 4. OUTDOOR RESIDENTIAL STORAGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN AN ORDERLY MANNER ROADS VEHICLES, NON-RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES. BARNS. FEED STATIONS. GRAZING AND SHALL RESIDENTIAL L FIRE SAFETY, HEALTH MAINTAINED NR SANITARY ORDERLY ANIMALS, ENCLOSURES FOR MAINTAINING FOWL OR ANIMAL MANURE, LIQUID OR DRY CHEMICAL STORAGE, HERBICIDES, INSECTICIDES, HAZARDOUS WASTE, OR SOLID WASTE 5. NOT MORE THAN 2 UNLICENSED VEHICLES SHALL BE STORED ON ANY LOT UNLESS OF ANY KIND OR DESCRIPTION. TOTALLY SCREENED FROM VIEW OF NEIGHBORING DWELLINGS AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY. 15. THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO THE COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND SUCH SCREENING SHALL MEET ALL APPLICABLE PERFORMANCE AND DEVELOPMENT ROAD MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FILED SIMULTANEOUSLY HEREWITH, UNDER AUDITORS STANDARDS SPECIFIC TO THE DISTRICT IN WHICH THE STORAGE IS KEPT, AND FILE NUMBER , RECORDS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SHALL BE IN KEEPING WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE AREA SCREENING SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 78.30 JCC. OUTDOOR STORAGE OF 3 OR 16. ADDRESSES SHALL BE APPLIED FOR AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. MORE JUNK MOTOR VEHICLES IS PROHIBITED EXCEPT IN THOSE DISTRICTS WHERE SPECIFIED AS AN AUTOMOBILE WRECKING YARD OR JUNK(OR SALVAGE) YARD AND ALLOWED AS A PERMITTED USE IN TABLE 3-1 OR CHAPTER 18.18 JCC, AND SUCH STORAGE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF JCC 78.20.100. AUTOMOBILE WRECKING YARDS AND JUNK (OR SALVAGE) YARDS. IN NO CASE, SHALL ANY SUCH JUNK MOTOR VEHICLES BE STORED IN A CRITICAL AREA. 6. EXTERIOR LIGHTING FOR RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL NOT EXCEED TWENTY FEET(20) IN HEIGHT FROM THE FINISHED GRADE EXCEPT WHEN SUCH LIGHTING IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. GROUND LEVEL LIGHTING IS ENCOURAGED. EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL BE ENERGY EFFICIENT AND SHIELDED OR RECESSED SO THAT DIRECT GLARE AND REFLECTIONS ARE CONTAINED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL. EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL BE DIRECTED DOWNWARD AND AWAY FROM ADJOINING PROPERTIES AND PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY NO LIGHTING SHALL BLINK, FLASH, OR BE OF UNUSUALLY HIGH INTENSITY OR BRIGHTNESS. ALL LIGHTING FIXTURES SHALL BE APPROPRIATE IN SCALE, INTENSITY AND HEIGHT TO THE USE THEY ARE SERVING. 7 ANY FURTHER SUBDIVISION OF THE LOTS WITHIN THIS PLAT WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE DENSITIES PERMITTED IN THE JEFFERSON COUNTY ORDINANCES AND CODES/N EFFECT AT TIME OF SUCH APPLICATION. THESE LOTS MAY OR MAY NOT BE FURTHER SUBDIVIDED IN THE FUTURE. 8. APPROVAL OF THIS SUBDIVISION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE APPROVAL OF BUILDING OR SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMITS ON EACH LOT. PERMIT APPROVAL WILL BE SUBJECT TO BUILDING LOT PUNS, TYPE OF USE, CONTOURS, AND SOILS ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS. PERMITS WILL BE REVIEWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SITE CONDITIONS AND REGULATIONS EXISTING ON THE DATE DIE PERMITS ARE APPLIED FOR. 9. ANY REMOVAL OF OR MAJOR DISTURBANCE OF SOIL WITHIN THE PROPOSED DRAINFIELO AREAS MAY CREATE SITE CONDITIONS THAT ARE UNACCEPTABLE OF THE INSTALLATION OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS. 10. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED 35 FEET. 11. MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE(SHALL NOT EXCEED 25X. LOT COVERAGE IS DEFINED AS AMOUNT OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE WHICH INCLUDES ROOF TOPS, DRIVEWAYS. CONCRETE. ETC. • 11. MINIMUM SETBACKS FROM BALOW/N ROAD AND DISNEY ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY SHALL BE 20 FEET. MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACKS SHALL BE 5 FEET. • • e � OV e24,V MA3ryT4 at)<`T SHEET 3 OF 3 5$� I P a e ]199 \`. 975- ]]N Sin nw. AL LAO LAND SURVEYING ■��T�� Sgl;m.WA 96362 MAPPING LL1l\l/ (360)661-2161 FINAL CHECK: SBC X DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING /� PAK 621-0310 PLAT CHECK: SBC CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OI CE ST(BBB)661-2161 DRAWN Br: AN 9(29N-TE) SERE. 01E2909-UAUNEY_SP_BASE-02208 -- Lot Closures July 3, 2013 Mauney/Rogerson Trust Short Plat SUB 12-00011/MLA 12-00141 Parcel name: LOT 1 North: 8656.3733 East : 19958.0006 Line Course: S 02-25-47 W Length: 660.01 North: 7996.9567 East : 19930.0202 Line Course: N 87-53-32 W Length: 15.00 North: 7997.5084 East : 19915.0303 Line Course:S 02-25-47 W Length: 684.27 North: 7313.8536 East : 19886.0214 Line Course: S 87-51-05 E Length: 547.51 North: 7293.3266 East : 20433.1465 Line Course: N 53-02-42 E Length: 79.47 North: 7341.1030 East : 20496.6516 Line Course: N 48-39-39 E Length: 69.07 North: 7386.7247 East : 20548.5102 Line Course: N 53-18-04 E Length: 98.11 North: 7445.3562 East : 20627.1736 Line Course: N 50-30-31 E Length: 66.36 North: 7487.5587 East : 20678.3849 Line Course: N 31-38-50 W Length: 1372.98 North: 8656.3694 East : 19957.9992 Perimeter: 3592.78 Area: 581,584 sq.ft. 13.351 acres Mapcheck Closure- (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.0042 Course: S 19-24-44 W Error North: -0.00396 East : -0.00140 Precision 1: 855,423.81 Parcel name: LOT 2 North: 8640.8550 East : 20377.0094 Line Course: N 87-52-44 W Length:419.30 North: 8656.3741 East : 19957.9967 Line Course:S 31-38-50 E Length: 1372.98 North: 7487.5634 East : 20678.3824 Line Course: N 50-30-31 E Length: 96.05 North: 7548.6476 East : 20752.5061 Line Course: N 54-55-50 E Length: 62.53 North: 7584.5753 East : 20803.6842 Line Course: N 51-40-30 E Length: 93.82 North: 7642.7551 East : 20877.2865 Line Course: N 49-07-14 E Length: 62.12 North: 7683.4108 East : 20924.2547 Line Course: N 51-10-25 E Length: 137.84 North: 7769.8313 East : 21031.6389 Line Course: N 36-55-39 W Length: 1089.60 North: 8640.8536 East : 20377.0029 Perimeter: 3334.24 Area: 485,872 sq.ft. 11.154 acres Mapcheck Closure -(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure: 0.0066 Course: 5 78-04-15 W Error North: -0.00137 East : -0.00650 Precision 1: 505,187.88 Parcel name: LOT 3 North: 8608.1739 East : 21259.4286 Line Course: N 87-52-44 W Length: 883.02 North:8640.8561 East : 20377.0136 Line Course: 5 36-55-39 E Length: 1089.60 North: 7769.8338 East : 21031.6497 Line Course: N 54-16-31 E Length: 52.97 North: 7800.7626 East : 21074.6524 Line Course: N 50-44-03 E Length: 92.70 North: 7859.4342 East : 21146.4224 Line Course: N 48-48-52 E Length: 74.63 North: 7908.5780 East : 21202.5875 Line Course: N 51-40-48 E Length: 29.57 North: 7926.9130 East : 21225.7869 Line Course: N 02-49-39 E Length: 682.10 North: 8608.1826 East : 21259.4343 Perimeter: 2904.59 Area:437,507 sq.ft. 10.044 acres Mapcheck Closure-(Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas) Error Closure:0.0104 Course: N 33-16-57 E Error North:0.00871 East :0.00572 Precision 1: 279,287.50 JEFFERSON TITLE COMPANY Jefferson Title Company 2205 Washington Street PO Box 256 Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone: (360)385-2000 Fax: (360)385-6967 SUPPLEMENTAL #1 TO THE SUBDIVISION CERTIFICATE Attention: This Supplemental contains changes which impact Title to Property set forth in the above referenced commitment. Prepared For: John L.Scott Real Estate Terry McHugh 2219 Sims Way Port Townsend,WA 98368 Commitment No.: 77664 Schedule`B" ®Paragraph 1 of the preliminary commitment is amended as follows: 1. General Taxes.The first portion$7,750.11 becomes delinquent after April 30`h.The second portion$7,750.00 becomes delinquent after October 31st. Year: 2013 Amount Billed: $ 15,500.11 Amount Paid: $7,750.11 Amount Due: $7,750.00,plus interest and penalty,if delinquent Tax Account No.: 921 094 026 Property ID No.: 23256 Assessed value: $ 1,523,386.00 ®There has been no change in the title to the property covered by this order since May 31,2013 at 8:00 A.M.,except the matters noted hereinabove. Dated as of June 17,2013 at 8:00 A.M. Jefferson Title Company By: Susan Brandt,Title Officer CC:Janice-Clark Land Office Form No. 14 Certificate No.: 77664 Subdivision Certificate ! „ r . ; JUN 1 9 2012 JEFFERSON TITLE COMPANY L JEFFERSON COUNTY PO Box 256.2205 Washington Street,Port Townsend,WA OF CO^^'i9UNITY DEVE[OPMENT Phone:(360)385-2000 Fax:(360)385-6967 Subdivision Certificate Prepared For: Order No.: 77664 John L. Scott Real Estate Charge: $300.00 Terry McHugh Tax: $ 27.00 2219 Sims Way Total: $327.00 Port Townsend,WA 98368 In the matter of the Subdivision to be submitted for approval, this Company has examined the records of Jefferson County. This certificate is made for the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction. Liability is limited to the charge made for this certificate. From such examination, the Company hereby certifies the title to the following described land, in said JeffersonCounty,to wit: Government Lot 1, in Section 9,Township 29 North,Range I East,W.M.,EXCEPT the right of way for a public road granted to Jefferson County over the West 15 feet of the North 660 feet of said Government Lot 1,as conveyed by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 75494, in Volume I of Road Waivers, page 548, records of Jefferson County, Washington. Situate in the County of Jefferson, State of Washington. is Vested in: Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson, Trustees of the Mauney/Rogerson Revocable Living Trust, dated September 4,2003 Subdivision Certificate Guarantee No.:77664 Page No.:2 Special Exceptions: 1. General Taxes. The first half becomes delinquent after April 30'". The second half becomes delinquent after October 3151. Year: 2012 Amount Billed: $ 14,898.40 Amount Paid: $ 7,449.20 Amount Due: $ 7,449.20,plus interest and penalty, if delinquent Tax Account No.: 921 094 026 Assessed value: $ 1,523,385.00 2. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recorded: January 18, 1937 Recording No.: 79362 In favor of: Puget Sound Power and Light Company, a Washington Corporation For: Electric transmission and/or distribution system Affects: Portion of said premises The description contained therein is not sufficient to determine its exact location within the property herein described. 3. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recorded: May 28, 1943 Recording No.: 99789 For: A right of way Affects: 20 feet wide over the Northerly 20 feet of Government Lot 1 4. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recorded: January 27, 1947 Recording No.: 109336 For: Right of way Affects: 20 feet wide on the Easterly line of Government Lot 1 5. Right of the State of Washington in and to that portion, if any,of the property herein described which lies below the line of ordinary high water of the Admiralty Inlet. 6. Rights of the general public to the unrestricted use of all the waters of a navigable body of water not only for the primary purpose of navigation,but also for corollary purposes;including(but not limited to)fishing, boating, bathing, swimming,water skiing and other related recreational purposes, as those waters may affect the tidelands, shorelands or adjoining uplands and whether the level of the water has been raised naturally or artificially to a maintained or fluctuating level,all as further defined by the decisional law of the state. (Affects all of the premises subject to such submergence) 7. Notice to Title and the Terms and Conditions thereof: Recorded: June 7,2004 Recording No.: 485414 Regarding: This property requires an alternative technology septic system to serve the waste water need of the homesite. 8. Conditions,notes,easements, provisions contained and/or delineated on the face of the survey recorded under Jefferson County Recording No.435426. LPB Subdivision Certificate Guarantee No.: 77664 Page No.:3 9. A record of survey recorded December 8,2006 under Recording No. 518350, said survey discloses the following matters: Location of property lines,improvements,easements,Disney Road and Baldwin Road 10. Terms and conditions of the Mauney/Rogerson Revocable Living Trust, under which title is vested. Dated: May 31,2012 at 8:00 a.m. Your title officer for this transaction is Susan Brandt.If you have any questions concerning this title commitment,please do not hesitate to call me at (360)385-2000 or e-mail susan®jeffersontitlecompany.com By: Susan Brandt,Title Officer 558380 Auditor's PGS = 2 WD Auditor 04.01 P6 $63.00 FIRST A EPICp!TITLE !iii County PM ut+Vhli�i�l9khr41 Office N+4�!Wi( ILtikitli 11111 r When recorded return to: Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson,Trustees of the Manoey/Rogenon Revocable Living Trost 91 Baldwin Road Nordland,WA 98358 Jefferson County Excise Tax Aff # a S Dalt tax ■1' e� Tax$/aT, fir .ks Alfa$ J i, B so, „ Deputy Treasurer Filed for Record at Request of All About Escrow,Inc. Escrow Number:11-0024 S?oi6 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED (Not Statutory) THE Grantor Colombia State Bank as successor In interest to American Marine Bank for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATION in hand paid, bargains, sells, and conveys to Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson, Trustees of the Mauney/Rogerson Revocable Living Trost the following described estate,situated in the County of Jefferson Stale of Washington: Government Lot I,in Section 9,Township 29 North,Range 1 East,W.M.,except the right of way far a public road granted to Jefferson County over the West 15 feet of the North 660 feet of said Government Lot 1,as conveyed by deed recorded under the Auditor's Flle No.75494,In Volume 1 of Road Waivers,page 548, records of Jefferson County,Washington. Situate in the County of Jefferson,State of Washington. Abbreviated Legal: Lot 1 9-29-IE S&Ease Tax Parcel Number(s):921094026 SUBJECT TO: SEE EXHIBIT°A"ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. Dated: February 17,2011 Columbia State Bank By:Daniel Larsen,Assistant Vice Press ent, Special Credits Officer STATE OF Wa#h,ington COUNTY OF yi-bi L } SS: I certify that 1 know or have satisfactory evidence that Daniel Larsen signed this instrument,on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Assistant Vire President Special Credits Officer of Columbia State Bank to be the free and voluntary net of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. Dated: -4D• L'71 , -----• Notary Public nd for th tate of Washington KRISTEN M. RICH Residing at NOTARY PUSLIC My appointment expires: STATE OF 1NAS-i sUTON COhiNSS :J`i EX?ii ES SEPTENicH 15. 2012 UPS 16-090 558380 Page 2 of 2 021281201104:01 PM EXHIBIT "A" SUBJECT TO: Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recorded: • January 18, 1937 Recording No.: 79362 In favor of: Puget Sound Power and Light Company,a Washington Corporation For: Electric transmission and/or distribution system The legal description in said easement is not sufficient to determine its exact location within said premises. 2, Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recorded: May 28, 1943 Recording No.: 99789 For: A right of way Affects: 20 feet wide over the Northerly 20 feet of Government Lot I 3• Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recorded: January 27, 1947 Recording No.: 109336 For: Right of way Affects: 20 feet wide on the Easterly line of Government Lot 1 4' Rights of the general public to the unrestricted use of all the waters of a navigable body of water not only for the primary purpose of navigation,but also for corollary purposes; including(but not limited to)fishing, boating, bathing,swimming,water skiing and other related recreational purposes, as those waters may affect the tidelands,shorelands or adjoining uplands and whether the level of the water has been raised naturally or artificially to a maintained or fluctuating level, all as further defined by the decisional law of the state. (Affects all of the premises subject to such submergence) A cedar board fence encroaches 18.42 feet into this property 5• Notice to Title and the Terms and Conditions thereof: Recorded: June 7,2004 Recording No.: 485414 Regarding: This property requires an alternative technology septic system to serve the waste water needs of the homesite. 6. A record of survey recorded December 8,2006 under Recording No. 518350, said survey discloses the following matters: "� 1' I7 DEED RECORD 107 JEFFERSON COUNTY 'ole T936E YF, .ll • $dB6)IENT 1•.i. t SIIB iMDRNTURH, made this 113th day of Nay A. D. 1936, between E. U. Dobbin end !` .41 Y;.1" Croce Pitney Robbie a, his wife, hereinafter celled the Gran tore, parties of the first 1 port, PUGET SOUIID porn b L101IT CONPAIIY, a Messeehusotte corporetlon, herelnefter celled n I the Grantee, party of the ascend pert, "' I Thet the Grunters, for end in conaiderntion of the sum of One Dollars ($1.GO) end-. - -♦.1 •1 other valuable considerations, receipt of which is hereby eck nowledged, hereby convey end grant to the Grantee, its successors end assigns, the right, privilege and authority A ■ to construct, erect, alter, improve, repair, opernte end maintain an eleetrie trenemieston , ` _.` and distribution lino, consieting of e *Ingle line of poled, with nsceeeery bristles, guys t' i end anchors, and to piece upon or suspend from nuoh poled tranxiaeton, distribution end j signal circa, insulators, tro es•erme, transformers and other naceseery or convenient app• .,=I urtenances, across, over and upon the following described lando and promises situated in f the County of Jefferson, state of eaahtngton, to•wltl W j Lot 1 and tho South Half of the Goutheaat Gunner of the Southwest IY' Guenter of Dection 9, Township 09 North, Bongo 1 Gant, V. N., lees- - the Seat 16 feet of esid South One-Half of southeeat Suarter of S.11. .f. and less the 'Jest 16 feet of the North 660 feet of said Lot 1, conveyed ?= to Jefferson County for rood papoose. The center line of bald transmission and distribution line to be located ea folloae: At now located and etekod on the above described property together tith 1. J the right to extend from oetd Iine to serve adjacent cuotomera. - 7 1 Together with the right at oil tiae f e to the Orontes, its aucceeeora and assigne, o ■ Ingress to end egress from said lands eerosa ad3ncent lende of the Grantor.) for the pur• i 1 pope of constructing, reconstructing, repairing, re;ewing, altering, changing, patrolling 1 ,r j and operating maid line, and the right at any time to remove said poles, wires end appurt- r enanees from esid lends. t. Glee the right to the Orantae, its successors end aeelgns, at all times to cut all - brush and timber, end trim ell trees standing or growing upon sold lands whlah, In the opinion of the Orentee, e0nstitute a menses or danger to said line. .The Grantora, their heirs, successors or ensigns, roventnt_end egree_that they sill not do any bleating or discharge say explosives within a dletance of three hundred (300) feet of said line without giving reasonable notice in writing to the Grantee, its nuanceso or assign', of intention eo to do. The rights, title,privileges and authority hereby granted shell continue and be In forte until such time as the Grantee, its successors or 'soigne, shell permanently remove ' bald poles, sires end appurtenances from said lends, or shell othereise permanently aben- don said line, at which time all such rights, title, privileges end authority hereby granted shell termtnets, ' ' IN kITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been exbauted the day end year llret above , written. E. U. Robbins E. Grace Disney Robbing 'f 4. t--,, •a DEED RECORD 107 1 JEFFERSON COUNTY S . bTATR OP rABXINOTON ) 'A%;,. • i ea. r,:74..,1).: COUNTY Cr GITBAP ) l ,.}',.151, t, a,r C .,, 1, the undersigned, a Notary Public, do hereby certify that on this 18th day or Ysy ;ti},{, 193d, personally appeared before me E. U. Robbins end Draee Disney Robbins, his wife, , •"` . • w .• to me known to be the individuals described in and who executed the within instrument, f end acknowledged that they signed the new ea their free and voluntary act end deed, for the udes and purpoea■ therein mentioned. itr> 0104J given under my hand and official loci the day end year in this certificate oboes ,,.`� written. ' 'r 1 • (8EAL) D. P. Nisi 'IP;:.:... Commission Expires flotery Public In and for the State of -7. 1- . July 17, 1937 noehington, residing at Eremerton ,' 01H Piled for-Record et Request of Grantee, January 18, 1937,a t 8 A.D. end recorded in . r 5.,,Ct+"•volume 107 of•Deede, Page 878, Records of Jefferson County, rleehington. • R 1✓• R. E. Artdernon, County Auditor, r""...a .. - BY �4f.�._c<-,) 2-21--�-4' Deputy, .1.,?-?0,4r r Recorded 2iadexed2,/Proof Read"). i{14 • ' C' , l n.' . [ .,..,,..z.. i , • t. i_. 4v. 0:kA 'a V ti. i x, 7 '...t •1 I " • 1 ' ['i • . • • 4..ti,P '-. f tYFy .,(7, ✓"tin ,I , I va(j DEED RECORD 113 JEFFERSON COUNTY • D07en 1•. t. ;4.1.0 Cnnnol led S. 0. :, :I1.rU Conenlb-A 7ANIIASITY IMO 517.71*(14 '0101 YON MA 111 Tar. ETU/. 01'W 2t 121701r 00 1:1' P1n r11PLOre. E. V. Robbinz, e1 40 known OS Chan! 9. Robbins, end traoo Disney Roblin°, husband owl tare, or the °aunty or Jefforson, ctate of le/Anniston, for end in oonolderatlon of Pour teen Rnndred and 0o/1001ns (1`•1100,00) do1).ane, In)'.ni ;eta, eonsey nto vnrront to ;fort n, 'furntr and Monty Turner, 1:3111%enl ntd wife, the follonin, d>cerIbed reel aetate, o11.hrte In tho County or .tor Corso., eteto of waabinrtont ..ereinraont Lot 2 of Suction 9 to Tamable 29 North, dense 1 toot of the 7tll,mrtto liorldlen; 111110, a rtfht of nay 20 feet rldo over tto 9ortharly 20 feet or 0oaorrront Let I or Section 0 In 'fothe ito 20 (forth, Ranre I Cent of tho R111eslotte Merldi en, Damn this Shah dry of 'ley A. D., 1093, G. 11. Ronetnn (SEAL) Grsoe uterer hotline (SSA.) 517 Ye %:.,:.1111nr 011 ) (55. i, 1142 undernlrned, e notary ?idle In end for the oteto of ^aritinwton, hereby cortlry that on IlhIs 27lb de+ of raj A. D., 1943, rereenoiiy enponrod before sm iheU l,Ins, nleo knam no tinned D. ilnbbins, and Grow Disney Bobbin., huebnnd rind wire, to me boon to be the lndivldusl dOCOribod In end trite ezeoo ted tho forDEOins inotrnnont, eta rcknwlodCcd thct they ol,;nOd end scaled the sane ea their Cr ea arm/ 1/olunter7 net one doe., for the urns and nurposea theroin mentioned. ;tren mad er Pr/ betel ME Off1010 meal the dry and y•'l loset OUOvc 'MI ttnn. n C Sorbet (Sr.SL) ::antrisslon C.:hires notary nubile in and for the stele or Arr. 13, 1947 Bash1n(,'ten, roeidlnt et Po r t Toren end, le meta County of Jai Carson. II 7110. by ihoord at the Item,eat of Trent.° b y E0, 39 nt 10 A. M., end r00004.6 !II Lt :ol°rr• 11:+ or tools, P-rn 5'0. accords of .lefferoon Crvnty, ..obinEton. V. i'. Rlooherdson, County Auditor, ;;7_ , Leant}'. Mreo hod '�Indee..5d�fff�''"_t'roof 1:crt._ ►10[ 9J . �J7 I4f 39j JII10160M CUD MOOR Ml. 170 tt1 PI . . •1• - 1 I I/ rot 1100 011010107/011 of No pro•l••• bnln•rtar sot put, I. V. lb/dine, oleo krolm c• flood U. aabbin•, end 0•r. Moray hobUn•, nu►butd and War b•relnartsr f.U.d Po .. .r, *grebe to soil, •,td Marl I,Ta•ror shot Y.aey 70.- -.*tirNnd led •tf•1 h.tir.fl•r rolled N. Payer. •Mr«t tO bay O. rollo•irq droorlyM nal •.tot., .ltWta In•Lrn County of J•ff.esos, /tats of 1•dhlneton. wan p.rticularly M,rrlo-d •• fnllOrs, to-81W ... �! `^^`kyk pafon.r.nt lot R of IdIrLI 9,1• to,thl p 19ir li Ib of Inc 1 ltd Ott.IN ridl•n, 1190.rlfht a..n .r 20 fSUL .td. en Lot 4'or y 11it0 of I. ant tut 1 end colon Cho roru•rly 10. 'wet of N. f+•trd•r of **Id ••omant Lot 1 or Se.tlnn 9 to TwnNlp'J9 morn, p.m. I L.et of Ne Y; Jillasetto Marini-n. for in. do of Partoea Rordrad end Po/1C01hr (7LLOO•00) lbll•rio, PLO.IuadrM old lo/) U.. (/)OO.Ui , bollard. of Ala. Is to to lalf o.drNo[1f thl, .dnYant, N. nnlpt of whirl, to tirby ntnO•edr•dt .top Biro owoon.d and Yo/IpDN• (I1900.00) Callon •Ith 1ntenat at No rota or sty par toot. Mr arum., •t fort Te+aweQ ts,hlnrton, •• folleelr •glnrrtss en the 1.t day of Weather, 1941, end g...rty fly tn•r5,11.- the sue or flb.Wa Or•nr• 11th lntarsll on nrtntlpal fMnlniN unpaid On sold day WILL) Mi ne. I. fully p.11, nranll*fa or loos, I••alrartton or d eat• to o� tt tea led roYn his ti croon••.y w +�•,..,,rler Iwo-toed Jolt Li. later hon.', a:rsa, La •a•LOt••17 PSI• on Mle or+aln••• •M to keno the. bpror.•-•n• thereto I....nd •v•IC■t 1044 by fin in • n11nU. :naur•nn 1• onn,..py, 1•N. here of J tons, NN ion• p•7•M, to ,wailer nnA hiy r, we thole intcnJt• ape•.•, ell pollti.s to rw.•ln cilia Thai sailer. aM Is the craft lint the `o'er shalt Mk•dr1•ull In orb•.ay of the ror•ralnti h•r.1n rc,an.tr,-d, or ...Lk roil to.ob. N. portent• •foreasif O. No tts.• npartfl•,1 tie tl..• or nayent Moth,^erl•rs4i to bf The •re.nn Of Nl. •gre•rnnt, N.• tn. seller ••y r4rlen thin a/fr'o.it null bd ,,old. "The a•ll.r eyre•r. that U• buyer soy or •nO errupy•said prYl •• der IN" ra•pll.nr• pith In bpI• harW1, rot II sloth) of •fly COO4t tton heroin M.11 be •a'b, anti Na hair, In I•nitbd Lo rawale to peer•.10o, No burr 0a11 he ronl%A•nd to to a •,t.nt Cl ,old pr.oLn•a foto month to ,orlb •M Moll to entitled to only our! entire to moral^ N 1•proofing by lire, and cud, nOtlr. to -route a.•11 be nn.t...i to P. a drtl•-•r.tnn of lho t•ninatlen of Ih1• cont.-onto all loprar+.t•ion n,o.n�on I. San., • ,an Of told real ••L•to., anal shall not I. sowed or attend without the well Wan U. buyer N•ll hors pal* N. af••r•t *Loos or annoy sfooan.Id, Non tl,• .•liar wilt 1.11r•. to the buyer• dart n,n•ytny ',id pr•••■••■ In f-,s starts ON LM coral ro•••••l.. of nrfknty, •nrentln: fro. 1.rh •srranty son, ltwi se Na buyer in...0 ,10.0 4M ./esrd to ...y, . Tito valor •111 NrntV on .b•Lnrl Of title 1• the.,rrrI00a, •tlrh N• boor h•• ^`—Innd .r. round ..4f-trivt, end sirlrh I, to a •talmd ly ter moll*, until No lost pnyent is mod*. and N• ostler Mall not to r•I led upon to h•r• son. Ir•urbt On,. I.-. N-.1.14 of us. loot poy^rot. 1•ut .mall M7 the nasty of rant Rona at •n sound by or on•rrodnt of nth orb or art,of hl. aarc••.ors In lrrt•rost. I Po•ttiop..nt at Vila runtrnet or Lint •oh].rl•.ttOr hoesaf or &ontreel to ao.Iga Or Torrey the Nbler4 • **Cur h•not 01.11 t. •.ltt, unlo.• 1n• •• • to 10 of tin..LL.rAeo canto stet no, ntd tv iM ...lie,. tend ay arch ooriv•ant tholl rend., N Is roomer yeloobl• at N•ort4•n of N• 3.11•r. It IS• bt to Ong are/ itto. rM 1.0.1 said•••11Ssronl la 1..A• •Teri pnrnl* tM do n noggin p•y+ent if 600.00 ;so00,0'1 Ss O of prororinr • n•l••na or the ata•+• •t.•rrllri line)'-• rr.• M- Il.n ;Lod io to Ss .off for No f the f ei Na aortnA In/.moor .f Na fe*rr•1 l.N Unnk .itrh to now a Ilan IrelA.. L nose q• ~dogs .n •••11.1. to ••ru• SAM par1.1111 nines, ),an ••odd dork is to be roturr.0 to the .•edw.Metro eM .1l - ',Iloilo today this rontr,tt •ro to to nitn-at+t.d 0y too pert i.heroic,. I In'qtr.'s. 1B.nof, the •.lief •M No torpor how signed aM 4•11s•nd Nix .Crew••nl In d-plt,ata I 1Nla 911 dye of l.p1Yb•r, 1141. 1 } .lti.s.••r R. 14. Rattan, Ones Dt•roy Motsin , Uttar. tent 1. Darner /,nay runner layer• lITI Of a JtT1l1raor Coon, or J•rf.rsne•).•. 1 1, the Qtd•ryllr.d, • aobry Nb)tr In and far tn. sold +t. •, d.+hereby aerllfy Not on IhIr Ili`+ day ■ oaf d.pi ot•q 1941, pervonally arr•••f•• rarer*a. 1. -I• toil•In, and nrsr• DIPMy IPM ins, huah.nl •01 wife, 1ar4 Yon 1,. r Mod O.o,D Tinier, hu.C•.d and wife 14 •• t'to.n In In the lndlrtdnali ne•trtba as tanll.r ore.* Aseersysi lb• al till and arht.a•lodtd Menlo Lb.) Pape, •M ...lad N. sail. n. heir rn• and irolIM.ry era Yd lord for Lilt• oti•rod ?arm 1.Of TNSS tdIR1ffolr, 1 nay.benronto ML ay tend and arft.•d•1 officio) Intl th, cloy ern 1... 1n Nt. nrtlfIrb 4 flat •be.•• kr,l4n• �. J. S.rdlat Notary Ps Llia in sod for in. Slit, Of 1.ehlnatDn, residing et Port rp.n,rrd, t•nh1A, .n. (S iL}COY EPlns Inn) 1), 1�. • fllad for 14•COnf at the heu•.t of•.rl I. Turner, Jan 77, 194% it loll) 1.11. and r.rord.d In Voles,l/0 of •ad.., pen 9). taeotd. of J.fr.rson County. :; \, .�r� Poln J. County d., Coty ...or Lye 'C My Mont* M. JsMn, 1spuy • p.roedidy'Inl000dMroof ►••d Ai . • 1111 111111111III II III 1 1114Pape. 1 of 1 854104 J•fl•rson Co:ntY. PM 111 OF JEFFERSON WO 19.09 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO Public Utility District No. 1 of Jefferson County P.O. Box 929 Port Hadlock,WA 98339-0929 NOTICE In order to ensure that future owners of the property described below are aware of the following information,this notice is filed against the title of the property. This property requires an alternative technology septic system to serve the waste water need of the homesite. State of Washington Department of Health regulations regarding alternative technology septic systems require that scheduled,periodic monitoring be established. In Jefferson County, Public Utility District No.1 (PUD) provides the needed monitoring service as a contract service. A contract exists between ALAN BALDWIN AND RUTH E.BALDWIN property owners and the PUD to accomplish this monitoring service. In the event that the need for an alternative technology septic system or the need for the periodic, schedules monitoring is canceled by the State of Washington,this notice shall be null and void. In the event that a general sewer system is installed and serves this property and replaces the alternative technology septic system as the means of treating and/or disposing of the waste water generated upon the property,this notice shall be null and void. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL#921094026,LOT 1 SUBJ TO EASE(LESS 1 AC HOMESITE),SECTION 9, QTR SEY., TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 01 EAST, W.M. JEFFERSON COUNTY,WASHINGTON AUTHORITY By action of the Board of Commissioners of Public Utility District No. 1 of Jefferson County By Resolution adopted May 8, 1992. 1 • ii • s G.Park)r,M:nager STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) I acknowledge that James G.Parker appeared before me and signed this notice for the provision of Municipal Oversight for an On-Site Septic System on this day. `.r.....�x Dated S_ '6- 7- 2 o o ± LIy 0 A "4ct:ir Lq P , Notary Public in and for the State of $ • � : % Washington,residing in Port Hadlock it v}•••o„ �q• My Appointment expires 07-11-2006 rt t ••••11••0".• Notary Seal: L.S. i‘ WASH • I I 1 i 1 ■ c..... VASH. STATE GOURD. SYSTEM � i ix F,„.S c- i.Gaa. ix Sec. 9 PER VOL. 7 OF SURVEYS PAGE 101 \ 1 \` • i♦ inommiso' I i° SCALE. 1" • 100' I • 1 1317.38 1 SE7'53'32'E 4I A • N fl00BIN9 ROAD DISNEY ROAD It 20• G5E1[R FOP I.F 6 u N+`C" Tr.]C...0_M+w I In 37R1F-T W6... la 1 I>.3 rani.z'W 2.54 tsar _1 1 FO..... T.a T2..a S-C-X.,A C.A. n 1 1 n1 1 • xE P I O I y 1 1 o f N W i G � BALDWIN J lz V I 0 I V N+te: AG.p..fA. 1 -.- GOV ' T LOT 1 ° F`.`4 ' E.c¢+....¢9 ,R i i 18.4 7'.-.•.7 I. • Tn... Pnr...•ery - 1 1 ;o,� AP 921 - 094- 001 1 'x'1 • - ./,e I 6 1 /o'°3 LD of / / �� Si ZI / O 1 d, P ■ 11-.."."-P......0.(7-ZI / I / SCCTION SIJa01V 1317 N: 1 / Set We,."7 sE TI...°VGY9 P..c 101 ....D -The t ' / V.Nnae.O DUDS 0 S.A......i r6.4 Z.T.LAN 0.reo {{ / Ma[t.194 Fort (3.6. .To....S..14 awD E.4). I , Ro00.M4., PA Gohi os wn.c.a 1.. 1r TnE i ' ' / UNQ[Ca.LDe.D S..•.•.Cis F.-4 IIJ TOG / SE,FED-SOK C_'o.swrY's A. OR'S OFr.CE. E ANI'S TSC.0.1N..3 o... -1:415 Ear ♦•.4.sr S.Oes " or Cps.:.. Lot I 14a.e Thee.+ Rern.co IN zo 3]' 16 s.% [ona,M.w FvM1 3'4U+ C.O a.IW.\C T COw FOM1M `...•Tn VpL. I Pa 4l ■OI. Sea. 9 TNE L Rp��C�ap t.. FIELD PPOCE0URE5. IN, 8741/43,1!4. SECTION 9E T.29 N..R.1 E..VII. T.29E 6IA Lit N tit ►ARCED IV TOM SuRIET RAS AERTOO EI 6Y/IUD TRAVERSE ,i 1 K y26 TNO.. 922.1-11094-0 1 RECORDS OF JEFFERSON CO.. VA. �1 OSHIC R LIM 3 MONO ELECTR°I.IC TOTAL ,�J ! FARE RUTH SALOVIN 6,01011 IMEOICLIIE AND STEIL Tor. • I. WOOD SURVEYING INC. Al N.A13 t AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE SURVEYOR'$ CERTIFICATE 1•I"'A 2155 DI SCOVERT AO. PORT TOVNSENO, VA. 911366 [ICED 174 RECSRD 1x11 SAT a _ We RAA r0#1[0II RIARRMT9 A WM, = . �'�' 111 PMORE 360-366-6996 FAX 340-579-5659 2000. IM 4OL.baM 6164,19 RARE RAM VoER n1 8005T91E.1 IN CONIMRANCI R R LEGEND 0 51T 6/5'RUM VIM CAF '8.9050 RE°]°II- OM THE NE0[0 C[. AMMO C.'MOD 41T+174E REDNIRAlR19 or THE 840Ir 'l [3 POUND OLO MC!POST AS RERAIMS or ,EDGE LINE ,_ mow*RM 0 T.[MUM M. /9 ,,9� %6ET°[001 STEEL FEMCE POST°M PROPERTY LINE. {{ Y Y1..:lYl VITM 6ALDRN '. tt'' CENT JEIIIRSO,COIMT0 AUDITOR 074 AILT 7. 2000 7-f7-2Zoo0 0 FSE1 3%6 11[$09Pj tutz DiiTIO18E l/IFTM COI. CF 65. S a I Z I0 zI o Q £ } I 1302. 38 W ACCEPTED,S t/16TH MR SOUTH LINE GOD,T LOT 2 597 53'32'E (AD I. IRON PIPE BOBBINS ROAD 1`��° 3r'rse _ - *DISNEY ROAD 20' EASEMENT FOR I. a u 8- max» - - •___ 2n.X62 O 30: 8 12 '' i 127 ely cI_ P ; I . 0 = (SW1/4 9 - 2C. 4140 BALD I •• • .., GT) c0 4/0/20"" -0 ---1 to It. r- o ---1 cn _a. in CO c_ ....., • -› V) / rrl • Z rn 401" •-..., , A cr) 1 7 t...) i ID Z i ..... ! m ..--, . 5' (4- 6 a75. CL' ° ET 3 =5' -A • . 921094009 2 o c r.* a) •=-.7 ,:).) o -- . .TAX 5(ENLG 57') 1 • ' 0 - , -a-,_ 0 — ,, cj a w a_ _ 0) CD 77 t E c.) 6,... B — . ;--, r_.i- f-- 7-, ,---, .r.1-:-. 0 7, ----, - 921094D07 • 5:1) CD -,, -,-, aj (1.) (75- —I'7.< TAX 2 T3 -"-.--0 • (D CT) (..--)' :..---, p cr,. 0 (7,7; 3 6 CU 0 CD -5 a) CD 0 C) , 3 D 9- a c a 3 .., , . 4 _ _ :-... -:.,. ,, 0. la> g .-. c- at.) c „.•< :_-, ._ _; := o_ 7-,--- 8 wro o OC, j,' (r) -,; 0 0 C 0 -_-.3 -, .- - Ci C, al - .-_7, N >NI ai (D ■,-- -C- - , ii) - u, ; • -,. — 0 = o • ...-• -..3(0 ,,,,‹ -_--,,-0 0 * II) • \ _.,. <Cs rn P.) ,.-7 ao, "--, o -t-, •.-, ,,-,,, -, •-• - ca) 13 ....\ c2, (.3 ,...., ,..,-. o c) _ <4..:( ',....).•1%. o 3 ;_-_,, c'D — ;-oo -,.• Ific x E * 3 :=,_ 2 . a) , -7,...i., co 8 • 1 ,..;-: , c. Ss c , - 0 \.." rl \ .."->,- . ri ... November 19, 2013 TO: Environmental Health Department FROM: Development Review Division SUBJECT: Final Plat Review: SUB12-00011 Subdivision Type: SPA Applicant: MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE Subdivision Name: MAUNEY/ROGERSON TRUST SHORT PLAT REQUEST FOR REVIEW FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL ATTACH FOR YOUR REVIEW AND COMMENT IS A COPY OF THE: Blue Line Certification for sewer line extension Certification for water system expansion Other PLEASE SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BY OR BEFORE November 26, 2013. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE. CGUSLQ-PC\aisev■e-tde--- \ November 19, 2013 \tidemark\data\forms\F_S U B_PltRvw_Health.rpt November 19, 2013 TO: Jefferson County Auditor's Office'n(\∎Qi FROM: Development Review Division SUBJECT: Final Plat Review: SUB12-00011 Subdivision Type: SPA Applicant: MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE Subdivision Name: MAUNEY/ROGERSON TRUST SHORT PLAT REQUEST FOR REVIEW FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL ATTACHE OR YOUR REVIEW AND COMMENT IS A COPY OF THE: ✓/ Blue Line Road Maintenance Agreement CC & Rs Total Recording Fee $ Other PLEASE SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BY OR BEFORE November 26, 2013. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE. November 19, 2013 ltidemarkldatalforms\F SUB_PltRvw Auditor.rp November 19, 2013 • TO: Department of Public Works FROM: Development Review Division SUBJECT: Final Plat Review: SUB12-00011 Subdivision Type: SPA Applicant: MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE Subdivision Name: MAUNEY/ROGERSON TRUST SHORT PLAT REQUEST FOR REVIEW FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL ATTACHED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND COMMENT IS A COPY OF THE: V Blue Line / Road Maintenance Agreement Lot Closures Mylar PLEASE SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BY OR BEFORE November 26, 2013. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE. aja \ November 19, 2013 \tidemark\data\forms\F_S UB_PltRvw_P u bWo rk rpt ��cl�- Lvk C �ca�,o November 19, 2013 TO: Jefferson County Assessor's Office ‘C.\-9)\-31—A-R. FROM: Development Review Division SUBJECT: Final Plat Review: SUB12-00011 Subdivision Type: SPA Applicant: MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE Subdivision Name: MAUNEY/ROGERSON TRUST SHORT PLAT REQUEST FOR REVIEW FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL ATTACHED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND COMMENT IS A COPY OF THE: ✓ Blue Line �1 /Lot Closures �/ Plat Certificate Other PLEASE SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BY OR BEFORE November 26, 2013. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE. 6-c\ November 19, 2013 \tidemark\data\forms\F SUB PltRvw Assessr.r Pt - - - CA-J-64-CA �ok . osL)`'ceS 1k C� November 19, 2013 TO: Jefferson County Assessor's Office- - FROM: Development Review Division SUBJECT: Final Plat Review: SUB12-00011 Subdivision Type: SPA Applicant: MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE Subdivision Name: MAUNEY/ROGERSON TRUST SHORT PLAT REQUEST FOR REVIEW FOR FINAL PLAT APPROVAL ATTACHED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND COMMENT IS A COPY OF THE: V"; Blue Line V Lot Closures �L Plat Certificate Other PLEASE SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS TO THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BY OR BEFORE November 26, 2013. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE. ek--Q-U-SUNC\3y\64k*_— \ November 19, 2013 \tidemark\data\forms\F_SU B_PltRvw_Assessr r pt Jefferson County Department of Public Works • 1 623 Sheridan St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 } (360) 385-9160 Frank Gifford, Public Works Director Monte Reinders, P.E., County Engineer MEMORANDUM MCI TO: Michelle Farfan oVE Department of Community Development DEC 1 7 FROM: James W. Pearson,Project Manager_' DATE: December 17,2012 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RE: SUB 12-00011 Mauney/Rogerson Trust Short Subdivision Application Review After review of the proposed subdivision,the Department has the following recommendations based on the standards of the Unified Development Code: A. Transportation 1.Rights-of-way/Easements Unified Development Code Requirements Unified Development Code JCC 18.30.080(1)(h)requires subdivisions to provide access to the public road system at two locations,when feasible.A single access may be allowed provided that public safety is protected. Unified Development Code JCC 18.30.080(1)(i)states that access to subdivisions from collector and arterial roads should be restricted. Unified Development Code JCC 18.30.080(1)(1)requires dedication of a right-of-way 30 feet in width from the centerline of public roads, if such a right-of-way has not been previously dedicated. Unified Development Code JCC 18.30.080(1)(m)requires dedication of 60 feet wide private road easements,but allows a reduced width on recommendation from the Public Works Department. Unified Development Code JCC 18.30.080(1)(n) requires access easements from the public road system to be provided and depicted on the final plat. Public Works Department Findings Baldwin Road: Access to proposed Lot 1 from E.Marrowstone County Road is via Baldwin County Road which has been constructed with a 16'width for a distance of 1,056'. There is an additional+/-2'wide grassed shoulder on each side.There is a 15'wide right-of-way on the subject parcel that was obtained in 1935; it extends 600' south from E. Marrowstone Road to the access to the original residence on Lot 1.There is not right-of-way for Baldwin Road on the proposal site beyond this point.There is a 30'wide right-of-way on the adjoining parcels to the West in Section 8 that was obtained in 1959;it extends+/-1,284' from E.Marrowstone Road to the south line of Section 8. This right-of-way provides access to 6 parcels that were subsequently created by the Casey and Avery Short Plats.Presumably the County would have obtained additional right-of-way on the proposal site in 1959,if additional right-of-way had been deemed to be necessary. There are two existing residences on proposed Lot 1. The proposal won't change the use or traffic volume on Baldwin Road which appears to be adequate to accommodate the existing traffic. The dedication of additional right-of-way should not be required. Disney Road: Access to proposed Lots 2 and 3 from E.Marrowstone County Road is via Disney Road,a private road on a 20' wide easement that serves 14 existing parcels. It is 419' from E. Marrowstone Road to the boundary of Lot 3 and approximately 660' to the point where Disney Road crosses a drainage ditch. Physical access to Lot 3 would most likely occur beyond this second point. Disney Road at the E. Marrowstone Road intersection is 18' wide. The initial+/-450' segment of Disney Road which extends to Lot 3 is 12' wide. Beyond this point there is an additional 6'-8' wide grassed shoulder on the southerly side which allows vehicles to pass by driving on the shoulder. There is adequate visibility to see from the E.Marrowstone Road intersection to Lot 3. The segment of Disney Road that serves Lots 2 and 3 is adequate to serve the proposed two additional lots. Due to configuration of the County Road system, it is not feasible to provide a second access to the site from a County Road. The existing road system is adequate to provide fire and emergency vehicle access and protect public safety. Public Works Department Recommended Preliminary Plat Conditions No preliminary plat conditions are recommended. 2.Road Design and Construction Unified Development Code Requirements Unified Development Code JCC 18.30.020(5)requires all developments to be served by appropriate transportation facilities. Unified Development Code JCC 18.30.080(1)(a)requires roads serving developments to be designed and constructed to comply with the adopted standards of the Jefferson County Public Works Department, including the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials(AASHTO)Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Public Works Department Findings The proposal would not change the use or traffic volume of Baldwin Road. It is adequate to serve the proposal. The proposal would add a very small number of vehicle trips to Disney Road. It is adequate to serve the proposal provided that there are turnarounds for fire and emergency vehicles. This can be achieved if the initial 30' segment of the driveways from Disney Road to Lots 2 and 3 have a 20' width constructed with a minimum compacted thickness of 6"gravel base and 2"crushed rock. There should be a preliminary plat condition to this effect. II Public Works Department Recommended Preliminary Plat Conditions • There should be a notice to purchasers on the final plat that states: In order to provide an adequate turnaround for fire and emergency vehicles,the initial 30' segment of the driveway from Disney Road to the residences on Lots 2 and 3 shall have a minimum 20' width and a minimum 6"compacted gravel base and 2" compacted crushed rock. 3. Road Maintenance Agreement Unified Development Code Requirements Unified Development Code JCC 18.30.080(1)(p)requires that subdivisions establish an agreement for the continuing maintenance of private roads. Public Works Department Findings Lots 2 and 3 would be accessed from E. Marrowstone Road by Disney Road,a private road that serves 14 existing parcels. There is not a road maintenance agreement for Disney Road. It would not be equitable to require the owners of Lots 2 and 3 to be responsible for the maintenance of Disney Road in the absence of a requirement for the other property owners to participate. There should be a notice to purchasers on the final plat that there is not a road maintenance agreement for Disney Road. Public Works Department Recommended Preliminary Plat Conditions • The following notice to purchasers shall be placed on the final plat: Disney Road is a private road. There is not a road maintenance agreement for Disney Road. B.Drainage,Erosion Control,and Stormwater Management Unified Development Code Requirements Unified Development Code JCC 18.30.060 Grading and JCC 18.30.070 Stormwater Management Standards set standards for erosion control and stormwater management.The Code adopts the requirements of the Washington State Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. The standards are based on the area of impervious surface created and the area of land disturbing activity performed. Public Works Department Findings No road improvements are required for the proposal.No preliminary plat conditions regarding erosion control and stormwater management are required. Public Works Department Recommended Preliminary Plat Conditions No preliminary plat conditions are recommended. Michelle Farfan From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Wednesday, February 06. 2013 2:48 PM To: Susan Porto Subject: RE: SUB12-11 potable water review Yep. Thanks. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner,FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-9#57 360-379-4473 (fax) All voice messages and e-mails received by Jefferson CountY maY be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW Please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am -9:30 pm Monday to Thursday and closed on Fridays. From: Susan Porto Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 2:48 PM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: SUB12-11 potable water review Michelle, I now have the Certificate of Water Supply Utility Service form completed for the above referenced project. PUD#1 Quimper water system has agreed to serve the parcels. That was all I needed to allow preliminary approval. Final approval conditions were as sent earlier. Is this message sufficient for preliminary approval for water? Susa w Porto R,.S. Jeffersow couwto Public Health Phowe 3W. 3859404 FLAX 300.379.4487 ALWRUS worlelwg fora Safer§ Health%erJef fersow couwtu, CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message,including any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,use,disclosure,or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT NOTICE: All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is exempt from disclosure under state law,including RCW 42.56. 1 oN e.. JEFFERSON COUNTY 4go DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WA 98368 Web:www.co.Jefferson.wa.uslcommunitydevelopment 621 Sheridan Street�Port Townsend, I Tel: 360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcdco.lefferson.wa.us ,ykING,so Building Permits&Inspections I Development Consistency Review I Long Range Planning I Watershed Stewardship Resource Center FINAL MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE AND LEAD AGENCY STATUS MLA12-00141 /SUB12-00011 DATE: February 12,2013 PROPONENT: Marc Mauney&Lynne Rogerson PROPOSAL: The proposal is to subdivide 34.54-acres into three residential lots. Lot 1 will consist of 13.35-acres, Lot 2 will be 11.15-acres and Lot 3 will be 10.04 acres. Lot 1 has two existing single family residences, each served by an on-site septic system, and several detached out- buildings and two on-site wells. Access to Lot 1 is via Baldwin Road. Lots 2 and 3 are vacant and will be accessed by Disney Road. The parcels are located within the Quimper public water system and Lots 2 & 3 would be served by an on-site septic system. A wetland has been identified on the parcel that spans all 3 of the proposed lots and requires a 60-foot buffer. Development of the lots will occur outside the wetland and its associated buffer. The Optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This will be the only opportunity to make comments related to SEPA. There will not be another comment period after the threshold (final) SEPA determination is made. If the threshold determination is a Determination of Non- Significance (DNS) or a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS), parties of record may appeal the decision to the Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Notice of Decision. A Determination of Significance (DS) may not be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court. The subdivision lots are proposed for residential use. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: APN 921-094-026; Gov't Lot 1 except the right-of-way for a public road granted to Jefferson County over the west 15 feet of the north 660 feet of said Gov't Lot 1 as conveyed by deed recorded under AFN 75494 in Vol. 1 of Road Waivers, Page 548 records of Jefferson County,Washington within Section 9,Township 29 North Range 1 East, WM. PROJECT LOCATION: The property is located at 91 Baldwin Road, Nordland; at the intersection of SR 116 and Robbins Road take Robbins Road south and then east to the intersection of Baldwin Road and Disney Road. Parcel is to the east of Baldwin Road and south of Disney Road. 1 MITIGATIVE MEASURES: 1. Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48 RCW, Water Pollution Control and WAC 173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, and is subject to enforcement action. 2. Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent stormwater runoff from carrying soil and other pollutants into surface water or storm drains that lead to waters of the state. Sand, silt,clay particles, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered to be pollutants. 3. During construction, all releases of oils, hydraulic fluids, fuels, other petroleum products, paints, solvents, and other deleterious materials must be contained and removed in a manner that will prevent their discharge to waters and soils of the state. Cleanup of spills should take precedence over other work on the site. 5. Clearing limits and/or any easements or required buffers shall be identified and marked in the field prior to the start of any clearing, grading, or construction. Some suggested methods are staking and flagging or high visibility fencing. 6. A permanent vegetative cover shall be established on denuded areas at final grade if they are not otherwise permanently stabilized. 7. Properties adjacent to the site of a land disturbance shall be protected from sediment deposition through the use of buffers or other perimeter controls, such as filter fence or sediment basins. 8. All temporary erosion control systems shall be designed to contain the runoff from the developed two year, 24-hour design storm without eroding. 9. Provision shall be made to minimize the tracking of sediment by construction vehicles onto paved public roads. If sediment is deposited, it should be cleaned every day by shoveling or sweeping. Water cleaning should only be done after the area has been shoveled or swept. 10. Wash water from paint and wall finishing equipment shall be disposed of in a way which will not adversely impact waters of the state. Untreated disposal of this wastewater is a violation of State Water Quality laws and statutes and, as such, would be subject to enforcement action. 11. This project may require a construction stormwater permit (also known as National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and State Waste Discharge General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction). This permit is required for projects which meet both of the following conditions: 2 a. One or more acres of soil surface area will be disturbed by construction activities. b. The site already has off-site discharge to waters of the state or storm drains or will have off-site discharge during construction. An application with instructions can be downloaded from Ecology's website at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/stormwater/construction/ - Application. Construction site operators must apply for a permit at least 60 days prior to discharging stormwater. 12. A minimum 60 foot wetland buffer width shall be applied to the Category III wetland. Wetland buffer widths shall be measured along a horizontal line perpendicular to the wetland boundary. The buffer shall be graphically portrayed on the face of the final mylar. 13. Wetland buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. 14. A permanent physical separation along the upland boundary of the wetland buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. 15. Wetland buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred(100) feet, whichever is less. Signs shall be in place prior to and during construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Buffer- Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 16. All construction activities shall not encroach upon the wetland buffers. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. 17. Lighting from any source shall be directed away from the wetland buffers. NOTICE OF LEAD AGENCY: Jefferson County has determined that it is the lead agency for the above-described proposal. NOTICE OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE: Jefferson County has determined that the above described proposal, conducted in conformance with the applicable Jefferson County Codes and Ordinances, would not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the Jefferson County Development Review Division and an inspection of the site. COMMENT PERIOD: This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197- 11-355. Jefferson County has considered comments on its preliminary determination of non- significance. There is no further comment period on the DNS. 3 APPEAL: This determination is issued pursuant to WAC 197-11-340(2)(f). Jefferson County has considered comments on its preliminary determination. There is no additional comment period. Any appeal of this determination on the bases of noncompliance with the provisions of Chapter 43.21c RCW (State Environmental Policy Act) must be submitted in writing and conform with the procedures as set forth in Jefferson County Code (JCC) 18.40.330(5) with an appeal fee of $995.00 by 4:30 p.m., February 26, 2013 to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division (621 Sheridan Ave, Port Townsend, WA 98368) for consideration by the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner Ate- cie Hoskins, SEPA esponsible Official Date 4 Michelle Farfan From: Mendoza, Sonia (ECY) [Smen461 @ECY.WA.GOV] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 11:11 AM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: Cornett, Deborah (ECY); Smith, Joyce M. (ECY); Mercuri, Joyce (ECY) Subject: ECY 12-5888 - Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat project-Comments Attachments: 12-5888.pdf Importance: High Ms. Farfan, Attached are Ecology's comments for the Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat project (Ecology SEPA No. 12-5888). Comments are due today 1/2/13. Attached is the original final copy. Please reply to this message for confirmation. Thank you. Obama- GLCendaa -4 Department of Ecology-SWRO SEPA Coordinator P:360-407-6313 & F:360-407-6305 sonia.mendoza(aecv.wa.gov Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 1 cTATF a 4or 444 wit STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PO Box 47775 •Olympia, Washington 98504-7775 •(360) 407-6300 711 for Washington Relay Service •Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341 January 2, 2013 Michelle Farfan, Planner Jefferson County Community Development Department 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Dear Ms. Farfan: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the optional determination of nonsignificance/notice of application for the Mauney/Rogerson Short Plat project(MLA 12- 00141) located at 91 Baldwin Road in Nordland as proposed by Marc Mauney Trustee and Lynne Rogerson Trustee. The Department of Ecology(Ecology)reviewed the environmental checklist and has the following comment(s): TOXICS CLEANUP: Joyce Mercuri (360) 407-6260 If contamination is suspected,discovered, or occurs during the proposed SEPA action, testing of the potentially contaminated media must be conducted. If contamination of soil or groundwater is readily apparent, or is revealed by testing, Ecology must be notified. Contact the Environmental Report Tracking System Coordinator at the Southwest Regional Office at (360)407-6300. For assistance and information about subsequent cleanup and to identify the type of testing that will be required, contact Joyce Mercuri with Ecology's Toxic Cleanup program at the phone number given above. SEPA REVIEWER: Sonia Mendoza WATER QUALITY CONTACT: Deborah Cornett (360) 407-7269 Any discharge of sediment-laden runoff or other pollutants to waters of the state is in violation of Chapter 90.48 RCW, Water Pollution Control, and WAC 173-201A, Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington, and is subject to enforcement action. Erosion control measures must be in place prior to any clearing, grading, or construction. These control measures must be effective to prevent stormwater runoff from carrying soil and other pollutants into surface water or storm drains that lead to waters of the state. Sand, silt, clay particles, and soil will damage aquatic habitat and are considered to be pollutants. During construction, all releases of oils, hydraulic fluids, fuels, other petroleum products, paints, solvents, and other deleterious materials must be contained and removed,in a manner that will prevent their discharge to waters and soils of the state. The cleanup of spills should take precedence over other work on the site. II January 2, 2013 Page 2 Clearing limits and/or any easements or required buffers should be identified and marked in the field,prior to the start of any clearing, grading, or construction. Some suggested methods are staking and flagging or high visibility fencing. A permanent vegetative cover should be established on denuded areas at final grade if they are not otherwise permanently stabilized. Properties adjacent to the site of a land disturbance should be protected from sediment deposition through the use of buffers or other perimeter controls, such as filter fence or sediment basins. All temporary erosion control systems should be designed to contain the runoff from the developed two year, 24-hour design storm without eroding. Provision should be made to minimize the tracking of sediment by construction vehicles onto paved public roads. If sediment is deposited, it should be cleaned every day by shoveling or sweeping. Water cleaning should only be done after the area has been shoveled out or swept. Wash water from paint and wall finishing equipment should be disposed of in a way which will not adversely impact waters of the state. Untreated disposal of this wastewater is a violation of State Water Quality laws and statutes and, as such,would be subject to enforcement action. This project may require a construction stormwater permit(also known as National Pollution Discharge Elimination System(NPDES) and State Waste Discharge General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction). This permit is required for projects which meet both of the following conditions: 1. One or more acres of soil surface area will be disturbed by construction activities. 2. The site already has offsite discharge to waters of the state or storm drains or will have offsite discharge during construction. An application with instructions can be downloaded from Ecology's website at: http://www.ecv.wa.gov/programs/wq/stormwater/construction/-Application. Construction site operators must apply for a permit at least 60 days prior to discharging stormwater. Ecology's comments are based upon information provided by the lead agency. As such,they may not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations that must be obtained or legal requirements that must be fulfilled in order to carry out the proposed action. If you have any questions or would like to respond to these comments, please contact the appropriate reviewing staff listed above. Department of Ecology Southwest Regional Office (SM:12-5888) cc: Deborah Cornett, WQ Joyce Mercuri, TCP Joyce Smith, WQ/HQ Marc Mauney Trustee(Applicant) Lynne Rogerson Trustee (Applicant) Michelle Farfan From: Sherrie Shold Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 9:02 AM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: RE: Assignment of new parcel numbers Good Morning Michelle, I have those parcel numbers for you and, as I mentioned yesterday, they will not be built in the system as of now. 3-Lot SP 2-Lot SP Lot 1-921094035 Lot 1-021203014 Lot 2-921094036 Lot 2-021203015 Lot 3-921094037 Please let me know if I can provide any other information for you. sherrle Sherrie shold Propertu Operattows J e f f e rso w Co uwtj Assessor's office f`Lce 360-385_9105 sskoLd@eojeffersow.wa.us From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 12:54 PM To: Sherrie Shold Subject: Assignment of new parcel numbers Hi Sherrie: I have two short plats both by Marc Mauney that need to have parcel numbers set up on them for the PUD water meters. The three lot short plat off of Baldwin and Disney Roads is APN 921-094-026 and the two lot short plat off of Flagler Road is 953-700-320. Thanks so much Sherrie. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner,FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 1 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 Mfarfan@cojefferson.wa.us 360-379- 57 360-379-W3 (fax) All voice messages and e-mails received by Jefferson CountY may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 ROW Please note that DCD hours Changed as of December 1, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am - 4:30 pm Monday to Thursday and closed on Fridays. 2 Michelle Farfan From: Pat Perryman Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 10:55 AM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: Sherrie Shold Subject: MLA12-00141 Attachments: Mauney-MLA12-00141.docx December 21, 2012 RE: MLA12-00141 Mauney Michelle, Enclosed are my comments concerning this proposed Action. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thanks, Pat Pat Perryman P. O. Box 1220 Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360)385-9365 or (360)385-9222 e-mail pperryman @co.iefferson.wa.us I 1 OFFICE OF THE JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR Jack Westerman III, Assessor December 22, 2012 Michelle, RE: MLA12-00141 Manuney After reviewing this proposed action, I have the following comment(s): 1. The distance of 1302.32 shown on the north line of the proposed short plat does not include the road. However,the dashed line showing the beginning and the ending points of the distance indicates that it does include the road. This is just a note of something that I observed and is not a required fix. SURVEYORS PLEASE NOTE: This office tries to catch all errors and inconsistencies in the survey and legal descriptions submitted for our review but do not always find every issue. Please be sure to re-review you work so that we all have less frustration in trying to get these projects through to completion. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thanks, Pat Pat Perryman (36o)385-9222 (360)385-9365 pperryman@co.jefferson.wa.us 4 Michelle Farfan From: Sherrie Shold Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 4:47 PM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: M E M O.doc(new) Attachments: M E M O.doc(new).pdf 1 y MEMO from the Office of JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR TO: Michelle Farfan, DCD FROM: SherrieiShold, Property Ope>ratiarw DATE: December 14, 2012 RE: Mauney SP MLA12-00141 MESSAGE: Michelle, I have completed my review of the above proposed short plat and the following are my concerns/questions. Will the name of the short plat be Mauney/Rogerson Trust Short Plat? It would be great if we could cross-reference the name before it was recorded to verify no duplications. Our record indicates there are two homes and several outbuildings on Lot I; cover letter only indicates one home and several outbuildings. These are my only questions. • Michelle Farfan From: Randy Marx Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 3:58 PM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: Susan Porto; Marc Mauney; Terry McHugh Subject: SUB12-11 Revised survey dated 11/29/12, Mauney I have received a copy of the revised survey dated 11/29/12 and date stamped received by DCD on 12/3/12. I had stated prior that the reserve drainfield for SEP03-00064 needed to be shown on the survey, (this serves the southern most home.) The revised survey does not show the reserve drainfield area. I should have also stated that the area of the existing system also needs to be shown on the survey I have attached a portion of SEP03-00064 that serves the existing southern residence. You must show these areas on the final survey prior to final health sign off of the final plat. Except for the above no other issues remain for the on-site sewage portion of your health approval. Please be aware that the potable water portion of your application has not been granted preliminary approval. Respectfully i?a,t Ly 71tazhae Always Working For a Safer& Healthier Jefferson County 360 385 9402 ((((<> ><ur"> ><( (("> ><(((( /((('' ><{{.,> ><»<>>< (((0' ><{{{'> ><:_( ( >>< (( > ><((((°. > < (((( > (((°> ><{{{'> ><( (('> Online Septic Permits Web Link Environmental Health Web Site Link CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: r° o.(1(101,I1.1.1':111;-dt c: r -i'I I�.r co Iri',1..i'1di o '�:1r t113'f,i ti:bt uod rE'V ib'vtir _l�(r, ^iiYf.. ,-rW r'£.. CA ∎.1∎,_axth 15 prGt't.i. tea If ,/UL..310 t'?U. t11," IUt:;I'L8€ 'ec Dte . o ooso_contact the,,order by reply e-mail and hostcoy of copies of the original message PUBLIC RECORDS ACT NOTICE \'t i tr.;1i( .c■t^to/b/' <11 i,r°s hi,is■r,rea`,�,',I lu'thr ,I t,s,,>n C c, !1 c-r nil 111;111 for(',writ', Mr,tits �•, '.f \.1 `:t . 3':'8o,3 FA ln ,F f4I.• Ci.`]'vll(i �,.., t,;',�R'>> I 't'E f, n'; 111041 r i'd, tiit.rtt dp,l.1,C6lltC tit,i,)Y1¢ ;30' 1P1 77 t _ �, r E,*s.0 ,, t,10,01 ? a .'.rrtr.l 10110,0 it ; 0‘., Ir tat 111>c 31noi br'. iti<i tnIi;tp;is tl'I256 1 I \ 100—*60-116 '0N 133dVd .4 ! I Q •ONI 'ON1a33NION, NVld 1Y31SAS V3UV 311113S321 M31SAS 0Ild3S (�i _`NHW111J. N1M01V8 N1ri ,.i i i i i Y II =MUM - \ / oc - . arms \ �� ; `��:��y% a g tit / Cam' I vz'rr S' ' / L c3 �/ ' • /1 / i i r � / / i N i ,_ 44\\\ o On If N. 0. F A gam" ■ ts g ; � � . L- t S < mllo '08 NIM07V8 N \ \ Michelle Farfan From: Susan Porto Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 1:34 PM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: Randy Marx Subject: SUB12-11 Attachments: SUB12-11.pdf Enclosed are comments from Health regarding the referenced subdivision. Susan and Randy. susaw Porto IZS. Jef fersow PubLi.c HeaLtli Phowe 360. 3859404 Fax 360.37.4487- ALwaus Worlki.wg fora safer FteaLthLerjef fersow Couwt� CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message,including any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,use,disclosure,or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT NOTICE: All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is exempt from disclosure under state law,including RCW 42.56. 1 ty yn5 ., JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH 615 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend •Washington • 98368 www.jeffersoncountypublichealth.org Memo To: MICHELE FARFAN From: Randy Marx & Susan Porto Date: October 15, 2012 Re: SUB12-00011 Health Department Comments SEPTIC Preliminary approval is granted based on; • Resolving the issue of the location of the reserve drainfield site for the northern most home permitted under SEP03-00063. Reserve area not shown on survey dated 6/8/12. REQUIRES one of the following: o Make application to re-designate the reserve drainfield area, septic designer required, or o Adjust the proposed property line • Showing the reserve drainfield area for the southern most home permitted under SEP03-00064 also not shown on the original survey dated 6/8/12. • Each system must have a current O&M inspection. • The site inspection of 10/3/12 and review of the soils submitted indicate that there are areas with soils suitable to support onsite sewage systems on each of the proposed lots. • The lot sizes meet minimum land area requirements specified in WAC246- 272A for the soil type and water supply proposed. Prior to final approval BY Health the following is needed: • Resolution of the reserve drainfield areas referenced above for the two existing homes on the property. COMMUNITY HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES PUBLIC HEALTH WATER QUALITY MAIN: (360)385-9400 ALWAYS WORKING FOR A SAFER AND MAIN: (360)385-9444 FAX: (360)385-9401 HEALTHIER COMMUNITY FAX: (360)379-4487 WATER Prior to preliminary approval Health will need: • The parcel is within the current water service area of the Quimper Water System. The certificate of water supply utility service review application must be completed, signed by the applicant and process through the Jefferson County PUD #1. Completed form must then be submitted. Prior to final approval BY Health the following is needed: • All existing wells must be labeled "not approved for potable water supply" and state the intended use of the well. If the wells are unusable (as defined by WAC 173-160-381) they shall be decommissioned in accordance with WAC 173-160-381 and comply with Jefferson County Health Department Policy Statement 96-02. • Please label the wells with the unique ID number on the well tag, if available. • Water meters and water lines to serve each parcel must be installed to meet requirements per JC 18.35.130 (1) (b). Show meter and/or water line locations as installed on the face of the plat. COMMUNITY HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Gti', �.�, �,, WATER QUALITY MAIN: 360-385-9400 " "��''���"� ' J 't� hive MAIN: 3603859444 FAX: 360-385-9401 HEALTHIER COMMUNITY FAX: 360-379-4487 Michelle Farfan From: Randy Marx Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 8:37 AM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: 'Marc Mauney'; 'Terry McHugh' Subject: RE: SUB12-11 Revised survey dated 11/29/12, Mauney Yes. I signed off the septic portion prior with this understanding. IlasLCCy 11LtcrLx Always Working For a Safer& Healthier Jefferson County 360 385 9402 ><((((> .tu-> ><( ((°> ><((((O> ><(((c'> (( "> ><(((("> ><((((°> ><> ><> ><({E"> ><»<>><((((> ><E> ><('( ">><('((> ><((((p> l ((°> ><(((((h\ ><{{c> ><( ((> Online Septic Permits Web Link Environmental Health Web Site Link CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE . . >t!t it .a;. Arr .t+auY41«,i ICti`=`cO., U50', cL t■JSU!f•, n, th U UUIfSrr Jte(., It),,tt cu■C. tl.,t tf C' ltC"1110: ,And Lit sV 'j 6I1 cops of tLc one nal mescojo PL 1ThIC.'RECORDS ACT NOTICE. \f , 14 t,, tr OH., a,;rti,li.as b.. n,..-n.d■>s th• Ictlt 'oanK„ marl 5,Stc',_ �'• �tr, x t ,t�a;�., i+c r■r "('lS 4' )t,. i n.i.: ih.°rucii* 011114,4 44 4 t+i..asI ti;t^,. avail al11 Cnir h+<ry i. >;tir•. , u mot° From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 12:14 PM To: Randy Marx Cc: Susan Porto; 'Marc Mauney'; 'Terry McHugh' Subject: RE: SUB12-11 Revised survey dated 11/29/12, Mauney Hi Randy: Your comments below can be added as conditions to the preliminary approval and will need to be depicted/satisfied prior to final plat approval. Do you concur that I can add them as conditions for preliminary approval? Michelle Farfan Associate Planner,FHM Lead Dept. of CommunitY Development 622 5heridah Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @cOJefferson.)a.us 360-379-9457 360-379-4473 (fax) All voice messages and a-mails received by Jefferson County maY be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56RCW. 1 Please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1, Zoos. Our office Is open to the public 9:00 am -4:30 pm MondaY to ThursdaY and closed on Fridays. From: Randy Marx Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 3:58 PM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: Susan Porto; Marc Mauney; Terry McHugh Subject: SUB12-11 Revised survey dated 11/29/12, Mauney I have received a copy of the revised survey dated 11/29/12 and date stamped received by DCD on 12/3/12. I had stated prior that the reserve drainfield for SEP03-00064 needed to be shown on the survey, (this serves the southern most home.) The revised survey does not show the reserve drainfield area. I should have also stated that the area of the existing system also needs to be shown on the survey I have attached a portion of SEP03-00064 that serves the existing southern residence. You must show these areas on the final survey prior to final health sign off of the final plat. Except for the above no other issues remain for the on-site sewage portion of your health approval. Please be aware that the potable water portion of your application has not been granted preliminary approval. Respectfully tZa_m l{F 7La-tcx Always Working For a Safer& Healthier Jefferson County 360 385 9402 ><((iC ></tr> ><( (( > ><(((( ' ;rr ((((' (( ><(((f`'� `> <" (0((' ><> >< ><{{_..> ><.><>><�(((`�;> ><{l{.,> >�-( ( �>C( ((�> >'<((((' / < (V (l (((C"- ><{{,> ><( (C Online Septic Permits Web Link Environmental Health Web Site Link CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: and may conta,n t the intended ;ia.nt, momot mom ,.ni?t.d t moo slndar h n Vi spa trov a3) ■.odam of the or ti■'n<, nin<sage PUBLIC 1 LCORP"AC f NOTICE. il;i„aim i<r<,h Ica a% iced MUerm;nn l matt e mat:,yarn anti Is ii'non fnrc',Obits(t In tiro ,,: Putu Records i,rr+ fire Cnnr t1 mnsi ra it a a thrs n.mail and its COI-14'11K In arac ire°r,.an •,.+ . r< fr ;r, ,.,-marl 11111(SS it rs exe,:rii);rr■rrr i'U_vilaasur r mule),stale Lain,including AC'th 42 50, 2 olEINIED CERTIFICATE OF WATER SUPPLY UTILITY SE cdt31 2013 JEFFERSON COUNTY JEFFERSONCOUNIY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT *********OFFICIAL USE ONLY DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE ************** *** ***************************************** * mL4-I .- 14 I /,sutra - 1I Application Number Project Name Approved Water Plan Water Utility Assigned By ************************************************************* ************************************************************* APPLICANT TO COMPLETE Applicant Name >Mgrc HoUnPy v-bihne 1?Dde4V Proposed Project ,3-1. 361-- Md. Project Location Cif -Mldw1n,1 Li0� IV�d/Qiylcf Project Preliminary Plan: Indicate the number of units of each category: Residential I/, Multi-Family Commercial Industrial Agricultural Other I, the undersigned, certify that I, or my appointed representative have discussed this proposed project and its impacts with the Water Utility shown above. f acknowledge that this proposed project may require improvements to the water system shown above which would incur my financial obligation. Prior to Final Plat approval or approval of the Water System Plan or the Engineer's Report, it is understood that a legal contract between myself and the Water Utility must be submitted to Jefferson Count which s.ecifies the terms of the water service o erational res.onsibilit and financial obligation. Furthermore, I acknowledge that I have read and understand the following material. 0/L3ff3 Signature of Applicant Date Page 1 of 6 1 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE WATER UTILITY A. Please circle the appropriate action(s) and/or fill in the appropriate blanks. 1 . The prop 'sal is/"` not within our approved water service area. 2. The desire to serve this development at this time/ever.utility'does/does not 3. The water utility isis not willing to assume interim satellite operational management responsibility for the proposed water system until a connection to our system is possible. If you (the utility) are not going to manage the supply of water for this development, please proceed to number 16 and attach a letter explaining the 'Justification of Denial'. The County will be unable to proceed without this 'Justification of Denial'. In all other cases, continue with the questionnaire. 4. The proposed development is/is not consistent with our approved water system plan. 5. Water service can be made available to this developmen immediatepy/by 6. Indicate estimated peak hour, peak day, and annual average water supply needed in gallons per minute (GPM). Peak Hon, Peak Day Annual Avg. Required fire flow n/a n/a Estimated domestic Total requirements 7. Number of fire hydrants required 8. The 'ON 1Vs_ has been approved for water system service connections and currently has active connections and service commitments. Page 3of6 1 Application No. 16. A satisfactory contract has/has not been made with the applicant to serve this proposal. Comments: /, the undersigned, certify that I, or another authorized representative of the utility, have discussed this proposed project and its imparts with the applicant. I acknowledge that the L .t, water system has the capacity in installed f.cilitie and water rights to serve the proposed development with the improvements identified above and that the service to the proposed project( '_ onsistent with this utility's water system plan. WAT: wTILITY PR• ENTATIVE �� 1 ; DATE ********** TO BE COMPLETED BY APPROPRIATE REVIEW AGENCY********** • B. Please circle the appropriate action(s) and/or fill in blanks. 1. Jefferson County Health Department (Individual Wells) The Jefferson County Health Department has reviewed the proposed method of water supply and hereby offers conceptual approval/ disapproval for the proposal. Final approval will be reserved until a suitable well site is approved and until it is demonstrated that applicable separation distances and health regulations are attainable. Comments: County Health Department Official Date Page 5 of 6 Michelle Farfan From: Jim Pearson Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 3:09 PM To: 'Janet and/or Willi' Cc: Michelle Farfan; Paul Walters Subject: RE: Baldwin Road culvert Janet, Paul Walters, the road supervisor has inspected the site. The road crew will be making drainage improvements in the near future. Jim Pearson Jefferson County Public Works Department 623 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 385-9162 (360) 385-9234 Fax Original Message From: Janet and/or Willi [mailto:aloha @olympus.net] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:39 PM To: Jim Pearson Cc: Michelle Farfan Subject: Baldwin Road culvert Hi 'Jaime' , Burrhead here. Long time no see! Hope all is well with you and family. Michelle suggested that I contact you with the thought that you might want to consider, as a condition of the pending short plat, requiring that the owners uncover (and direct the flow) the other end of the culvert that no longer drains Baldwin Road. I've attached some photos. One shows the uphill end of the culvert and utility pole across Baldwin, while another shows the downhill side with the same pole. I believe that the downhill side was blocked when the ADU was built and they put in the split rail fence, but I'm not sure. All I know is that there is clearly no outlet, the ditch fills (it's been how long since we've had rain and today there is still standing water in the ditch), and the portion of Baldwin in the vicinity of the culvert seems to suffer more road damage due to saturation. I would hope that clearing the culvert could reduce County road expense (although mostly it is my work to fill the potholes) and improve the road for all of us who use it. Hope you are having some fun and staying healthy. Janet Welch 1 Michelle Farfan From: Janet and/or Willi [aloha @olympus.net] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 2:39 PM To: Jim Pearson Cc: Michelle Farfan Subject: Baldwin Road culvert Attachments: IMG_5713_2.jpg; ATT41333.txt; IMG_5715.jpg; ATT41336.txt; IMG_5717.jpg; ATT41340.txt Hi 'Jaime' , Burrhead here. Long time no see! Hope all is well with you and family. Michelle suggested that I contact you with the thought that you might want to consider, as a condition of the pending short plat, requiring that the owners uncover (and direct the flow) the other end of the culvert that no longer drains Baldwin Road. I've attached some photos. One shows the uphill end of the culvert and utility pole across Baldwin, while another shows the downhill side with the same pole. I believe that the downhill side was blocked when the ADU was built and they put in the split rail fence, but I'm not sure. All I know is that there is clearly no outlet, the ditch fills (it's been how long since we've had rain and today there is still standing water in the ditch), and the portion of Baldwin in the vicinity of the culvert seems to suffer more road damage due to saturation. I would hope that clearing the culvert could reduce County road expense (although mostly it is my work to fill the potholes) and improve the road for all of us who use it. Hope you are having some fun and staying healthy. Janet Welch 1 . . . . , ' ... -,, .17 -ttt ' - ''''' "" ,•, t i ' .• . i , - 4 • ' .4*' .11.• 4. e t - , 1 . ,41tit K- f, '•„4•-„-,•,;_*'444.', :1.0I7,I4"I, 7•,''1'' t,v' N.;'itO,„W 14' '". . , ---.4'g-- . . - '--- ..' ... 0- , k 0 , .. .,- , - 4111.01. • to 4.."F.-A ' ' ' ' -4/ .. . . , k. 4-- -• ' • , , 1 t * .•' P -I -'''4-1 111 '''I '111' 11P - °"*.tile- 1 ... 4 , ,..av .. / . IF *6;1441Sti; , ° 4 ' 6 • • '" i, , • I ..... „. ' * '' 4 1 ' - .if ..,7., . 4. VF*I h .- '4- ''' 1•*--ah'44 of Ilo - -,. , .. -- -. ': 't, -• 'ff, •.,i .-"P i . t WI' , __-....• ..N.,,,, 't,,,'• --. i - f ...,.:. "‘ r. 40i ...'.44 A ''. - > , . • ' °. --- -- . -. .'i' "" 41! 44•2114.;4 A ' 0, • I•. .* . , 9 111 1 , • \ . , .te • ... P - , • '''''e : —0 '' Ps— ' ' of ' i if ' , -F, aff . ,.., I . - 1 . • ... . . _ ...4r_ 1 11 ,. Ilk , ' 11''' ,- ' jr°41,` '''' .... -.'" '.. ..-4:'.'‘'.7...' s- • - .,-, • , . , '''' _ ,'.. .. . . •,, 4.... -. r"' ,.. ' ' '''' . *S. , .. . t tf • - 4. ' #'-- , . . -. " II -- • 'C ' - ' -"•" . r ' p 44 ' , . :,....k A-419, ----.4) '46 --7-1iNZ -NaUdirailly i r ,r, . ... - ..-- .. . . • ...:- t. ..,p, - s ''.. - .•• •,104$ -, - *- Ajr er ... .... -- - 2111, 4pre L.- _,, de, "--- -',""*"arlit l'''' ' .., • .70 --N, •' , - %A/ y '''' . . '''''.: ', -7,46 / 11114. ' 4, 4140* , 4 4 ° i ,.... - 4" '1 it• i I .1. ••-• ,,Nlik ilt_ _1 it 4 . y , 1 litilbo . ' 441*'* • f;.'7. 4i ' '01,14( /' - . '. ' 4,40■;* , .. 1111,' 4 44 Iff . -, A , - - . ,. 0.. • f . sovr4,,, 44,4 It .,, .... . ..- . , , 4, $ • • - ...- . _ \,1, *,... • , , , .. . , 4'e* '''-e-----.. *-- ' •i,- ..., . t , , .4.,,,.... . ,, , ., At •,„§ •,, , T30,_'Mg li• ,,,,,,,, isb. 410.; . .....„.. ,... „, 0 :.,. . _ ...i#,..- .4 .4.4 4of -. -or •--..,:: • ,...-0- 4 \, ' .- ,,,, : t , V 4110: ,- 1 ....,-- ' ki. -41. aPitilliftb„. [ *µms r.t 1 1 a. ' 14 11/411‘4411 At 414V-' J eol . N4 .ice 4 : ..,' 4 %-t.,..* 1 • n , ,7,,, . . --;„ , 111;, t„,.... '''''.'-. •' tit47 ''''.. ',' F - ham, j Nk s • �p +e. !� • ,Ii.0 sty r Y.r " 6 y ' \Y x ~ f 4 d>♦ , b X x x lx, !4g w• .. 4 - g �... --n s .. .. a _Y (I . - r, - p^ x . �• � a i y� �„..:P a i ..... . M i d1 't A Michelle Farfan From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 3:08 PM To: 'Marc Mauney/Lynne Rogerson' Cc: Terry McHugh; Tadas Kisielius Subject: RE: Mauney/ Rogerson Short Plat (MLA12-141 /SUB12-11) I Ii Mark: This email is a follow-up to your phone call to Carl Smith, Director. Donna has conducted one site visit and her and I will be conducting a second site visit next week. I will be in touch with you late next week to let you know the outcome of the site visit. Please let me know if you have questions. Regards, Michelle Farfan Associate Planner,FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473(fax) All voice messages and a-mails received by Jefferson County maY be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56RCW. Please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1, 2008. Our office Is open to the public 9:00 am - 4:30 pm Monday to Thursday and closed on Fridays. From: Marc Mauney/Lynne Rogerson [mailto:marclynne©q.com] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:04 AM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: Terry McHugh; Tadas Kisielius Subject: Re: Mauney/ Rogerson Short Plat (MLA12-141 / SUB12-11) Michelle, I'll wait for the county and/or DOE wetlands delineation determination. Please let Terry and I know as soon as you have any additional information regarding wetland delineation. Marc Mauney Michelle Farfan Associate Planner,FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 622 Sheridan port Townsend WA 98368 Mfarfan@cojefferson.wa.us 1 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) X411 voice messages and a-mails received by Jefferson County may be suttiect to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56RCW. Please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1,zoos. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am -4:30 pm Monday to Thursday and closed on Fridays. From: Tmch @olypen.com [mailto:tmch @olypen.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:54 PM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: Re: Mauney/ Rogerson Short Plat(MLA12-141 / SUB12-11) please go ahead and call Marc Mauney and explain it to him directly. he returns from vacation tomorrow. thanks TM Sent from my iPhone On Jul 25, 2012, at 12:04 PM, "Michelle Farfan" <mfarfanna co.jefferson.wa.us> wrote: <image001.jpg> Hi Terry: I am in receipt of the above short plat. I'm in a bit of a dilemma. I am trying to get this noticed prior to my 3 week vacation 8/6. There has not been a determination by the department yet regarding if the county & state agree with the wetland delineation so it not clear whether I should notice it with SEPA or not. I spoke with Stacie about this and she suggested I let you know that if the applicant wants to pay for SEPA per WAC197-11-800(6(a), I can try and get it noticed before I leave on vacation (I won't be back until 8/27) or it can wait until I get back and for determination by DOE if they also agree with the wetland delineation. If the applicant wants to proceed with noticing, the SEPA fee is $740.00. If it turns out that SEPA isn't required after it is noticed, I can refund the $740. I have not contacted the applicant (I don't have his email) but can call Mr. Mauney if you would prefer me too. Please let me know as soon as possible so I have time to prepare the legal notice and agency packets if it is to be noticed before I leave. Regards, 2 Michelle Farfan Associate Planner, FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @cojefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) All voice messages and e-mails received by Jefferson County may be subject to public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9.00 am -4:3o pm Monday to Thursday and closed on Fridays. 3 i • Jr , 1n 1 ,S e •,, 1 „I3 Jft. { ■ • Mfr y% t L. y ' _ I a 1 , + d {' • .e q / .ia� °S3 r a ° k — •. " _ ' , rt ; I, {t n'b + _ Oi fy . d 1' µ•! .- x ' _ '.,- �I, 4 1 3'� i it WR.a e Je f . , - -0! 1 - i „y `l 1. e x i .`. 4 .. > s. ..�e NA. I f.", . \ t ,may; 6f. y f I x °' V 4 ., . . ■ • sys tide e ■ ' . } { v; + • 4 S' ' ;\ t;111,4'4"1 IN °I ...,•.; 44,,,- , , ., itk ° II - 4 t P� fkk '" , i .* . . ` • a ' • es , , *s . 4 _ q -F N a w - I i • Michelle Farfan From: Janet and/or Willi [aloha @olympus.net] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 10:07 AM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: Baldwin short plat Attachments: Baldwin letter.odt Hi! Dang, I missed talking to you. Oh well. Maybe next century? Attached is a letter (a little neater in case it goes in the file) making some suggestions for Critical area enhancements relative to the short plat. It always seems that the only time to actually have any teeth about enforcing the CAO is when a permit is being sought, so I hope there is an opportunity here to reverse the degradation done to the critical areas and their buffers. Hope you are healthy and happy. Hmmm, I suppose your kids have grown up???! ! Janet 1 January 17, 2013 Janet Welch 178 Baldwin Nordland, WA 98358 Dear Ms. Farfan, I am writing you in regard to the proposed short plat on Baldwin Road,Nordland (BLD 12-106). As you know, there are critical areas on the property, and buffers to those areas. If you have not made a site visit to the property, however, you may not know the highly degraded condition of those potential resources. This is no fault of the current property owners; the land was cleared and the stream was channeled many, many years ago. Cutting of grass has continued to the present within portions of the buffer, while other areas have grown up in rose brambles. At the same time the channeled stream erodes precious soil while failing to recharge aquifers on it's rush to the saltwater. I would like to suggest that, as a condition of the short plat, you include a condition that requires enhancement of those degraded critical areas and buffers. Replanting of appropriate native wetland species will enhance the property in many ways, and revegetation of the rapidly eroding marine shoreline buffer can stabilize the bluff and, at the same time provide essential wildlife habitat. Slowing the stream to a more natural state also would provide innumerable advantages. On behalf of the many wild recipients of critical area protection (and enhancement when lands have been degraded already), I thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely Janet Welch, R.S. Michelle Farfan From: Marc Mauney/Lynne Rogerson [marclynne @q.comj Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 7:12 AM To: Randy Marx Cc: Terry McHugh; Michelle Farfan; Susan Porto;john fleming Subject: Re: SUB12-11 Revised survey dated 11/29/12, Mauney Randy, are you whole for septic on the Baldwin property? I sent your first email to John Flemming who was supposed to provide all that you requested. I think he was a bit flummoxed. What does Susan Porto still require to fulfill potable water requirement? PUD has a water line running down both Baldwin and Disney and provided us written committment to provide water to two addition sites. Marc Mauney From: "Randy Marx" <rmarx @co.jefferson.wa.us> To: "Randy Marx" <rmarx @co.jefferson.wa.us>, "Michelle Farfan" <mfarfan@co.jefferson.wa.us> Cc: "Marc Mauney" <marclynne @q.com>, "Terry McHugh" <tmch @olypen.com> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 4:03:27 PM Subject: RE: SUB12-11 Revised survey dated 11/29/12, Mauney Sorry here is the attachment IZaxdy 7Tialzx Always Working For a Safer& Healthier Jefferson County 360 385 9402 ><((((°> .(r> ><(((> ><((((°> /><(((((°> >< (( °' ><((((°> ><(((((°> ><> ><> ><{{3"> ><»<>><f(((a> ><{{{.> :><( ( ">><( ! (I/ ><(((( > C 1 r> ><(((c> ><{{c> ><( ((5 Online Septic Permits Web Link Environmental Health Web Site Link CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE 1 I'CHI.IC RI CORDS ACT NOTICE: -111 e-mail vent to this nddretiti has boon lot e,yed l,w t:ho lotia: ells,('( initi-,:-mall system and is l.h rPhap sub,(.' . .. .� f,�]••ate I�11.P l(,un(I of hCV gi2.50. L.rider thahubik Re:.or L u 11;t'tsIDlt.y 1111.1S1 r l('ase fins P-rNii and If'.cuni'1 its la iu pers e ',11` 11)r ia9pe(Lien)iP tits i:` apt)lint('epitY'.eeuem l:t aam tilShc1`ure judir • ' 11•v,In,lading ` ` From: Randy Marx Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 3:58 PM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: Susan Porto; Marc Mauney; Terry McHugh Subject: SUB12-11 Revised survey dated 11/29/12, Mauney I have received a copy of the revised survey dated 11/29/12 and date stamped received by DCD on 12/3/12. I had stated prior that the reserve drainfield for SEP03-00064 needed to be shown on the survey, (this serves the southern most home.) The revised survey does not show the reserve drainfield area. I should have also stated that the area of the existing system also needs to be shown on the survey I have attached a portion of SEP03-00064 that serves the existing southern residence. You must show these areas on the final survey prior to final health sign off of the final plat. Except for the above no other issues remain for the on-site sewage portion of your health approval. Please be aware that the potable water portion of your application has not been granted preliminary approval. Respectfully Radruciff Ika Jz.x Always Working For a Safer& Healthier Jefferson County 360 385 9402 ><((((5 ><rrr> ><( (("y ><((((°> >°;rrr> • <((((°> >< (( °> ><((((°> ><((((".-. ><> ><> ><{{['.> ><»<>><((((°>/ ><{{{-> ><( ( o>><( (( > ><((((c> ><(�(( > ><((((°> > {{{"> ><( ((°> Online Septic Permits Web Link Environmental Health Web Site Link CONFIDENTIALIIY NOTICE: - , „_, . ;. . ,-. •s tr_ ,,' ,,;Ia rare. , c, ,,,-, n .,,r•,;;_s,,v .( �.,, ( ,i s.:3r_ )nth( ed l('cl(. , ,sae, d ,� ,�,:rC, .I dstributlon it ;aro'l bited. It yogi are not the untended ,t, gi , v e mall ar.d (iCaraw al ;m.e; of the enamel message PUBLIC RECORDS ACT IN;OIICE: :III alr,v 's t':;,ti +I rcl rna•d hr I}m 1. ILL e-moil•y'•t and F5:thon low t to thr LI, r:-fs. [.'I1,t(i :ha{'i.lhh( Ra:otos 1.3,,E IF::( ounty uiul a>a>tits e-mail:Ind 111 iclN.ents to any lgs<rr, u3,I+.::r±.o, '1 tiva e'-LIgui l xemp.110111 uiisdnsui( u,'aden •••Itu l,:11%.,au lading R( IA:42. 2 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING PUBLIC NOTICE JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ORDINANCE#03-0702-01 State of Washington) County of Jefferson) qVt I, e'.N'2ACQ, r- , being duly sworn of oath say that I have posted one (1) public notice poster on or near the site identified in the following development description: PROPOSAL: Three (3) Lot Short Plat with SEPA: The proposal is to subdivide 34.54-acres into three residential lots. Lot 1 will consist of 13.35-acres, Lot 2 will be 11.15-acres and Lot 3 will be 10.04 acres. Lot 1 has an existing single family residence and several detached out-buildings served by an on-site septic system and two on-site wells. Access to Lot 1 is via Baldwin Road. Lots 2 and 3 are vacant and will be accessed by Disney Road. The parcels are located within the Quimper public water system and Lots 2 & 3 would be served by an on-site septic system. A wetland has been identified on the parcel that spans all 3 of the proposed lots and requires a 60-foot buffer. Development of the lots will occur outside the wetland and its associated buffer. This notice was posted in full compliance with UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE on: ac e av the l day of c°M x!12012. c7v EC , s 20 (Signature of person posting notice) Subscribed and sworn to before me on this 0 day of , 2012. fEFFER50NCO `0 �V 4 ENS DEPT.OF COMMUNITI Acknowledgement: ea�►A ill iirn A . �il�-- �' �.r Notary PutZlic in and for the Ste of Washington, �S residing in ((-. �l;-c;(Ut'/1 Washington. My commission expires: �() - OA,"eLIC �p� k'ASMIta NOTARY STAMP MLA Number: MLA12-00141 Proponent(s): MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_NtcAppl4_APO_U.rpt 12/12/2012 Michelle Farfan From: Stacie Hoskins Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 1:54 PM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: MLA12-00141: Mauney Short Plat Hi, Michelle, FYI: I provided David Self with a copy of the proposed parcels from the revised preliminary plat for the Mauney subdivision proposal. He's a neighbor across Baldwin Rd and was curious about the configuration of the subdivision. Stevie 4. 7faaiuHa Planning Manager, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4463 * Fax 360-379-4451 shoskins@co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 1 06/15/2012 16:48 3603794451 DCD JEFF CO PAGE 01/02 Jefferson County Health Department Receipt# 615 Sheridan Check # Port Townsend, WA 98368 Fee (360) 385-9444 Date OTH JEFFERSON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SUBDIVISION REVIEW APPLICATION Type (check): Short Plat Long Plat Other (specify) Applicant Name. M kJ� ��pt� 1�J, +v--05� Address: Z l 33 O AK.1898 -d • I (� (�■ P ,- r ldddCOG11- WA- 9' 8339 I ' i ,II l ' Telephone: 38 ' a5(=.3 Z E-mail!l�d ress:JUN 1 �OI2 LI I L_ I JEFFERSON COUNTY Authorized Representative: It's- �{ MC Llvq v� ! l L. urPT ur t,UMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Address: '• o ajo n NU 1 eo Lo sews v. Pr Qa 3(9 ci) Telephone: 36b- 3° - l?6 3 E-mail Address: -E ok..e_ O1y ��n . Co�M PROPERTY DESCRIPTION l Legal Description: Section cl Township 2 ` '� Range C Parcel Number: 9 21 - Oct - o Z to Subdivision Name (if known): P.{Q,u^Q'9 42-6 -"f 3 SI-'e'-k 19C- *. #of lots 3 Average lot size t 1 .5 Minimum lot size 10 WATER SUPPLY SOURCE (check): Individual Well _ Community Well Public (specify) P. Extension of existing system: Previous Evaluation by Health Department D - Yes _ No Date of Evaluation: 3)/ b 3 Previous Owner (if known): 12-0�-lr\ go,1 e. NJ r✓1 NEED AT LEAST 4 SOIL TEST PITS PER LOT. ATTACH A COPY OF SOILS REPORT PREPARED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER OR A LICENSED SEPTIC DESIGNER, AND A PLOT PLAN SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE TEST HOLES. This eval - :n does •• constitute a guarantee of approval of an on-site sewage disposal permit. C(//q/n/ a— Signature of Applicant Date C:IDocuments and SettingslmichlLocal SettingslTemporary Internet FileslOLK4ISubdivision Review Application.doc Rev 02124/D3 Michelle Farfan From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 10:56 AM To: 'sepaunit @ecy.wa.gov'; 'SEPAdesk @dfw.wa.gov'; 'SEPACENTER @dnr.wa.gov' Subject: FW: Notice of Application MLA12-00141; Mauney/Rogerson Trust Short Plat Attachments: [Untitled].pdf Hi: Enclosed is an application for a 3-lot residential short plat. Comments are due by January 2, 2013. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this application. Regards, Michelle Farfan Associate Planner, FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan@co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) All voice messages and e-mails received by Jefferson County may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am - 4:30 pm Monday to Thursday and closed on Fridays. Original Message I From: HP Copier Digital Sender [mailto:hpcopier @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 10:53 AM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: Notice of Application MLA12-00141; Mauney/Rogerson Trust Short Plat Please open the attached document. This document was digitally sent to you using an HP Digital Sending device. 1 • JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER CASE NO. I6 a, —1 I f( / oi - ii CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I make the following certification: I am competent to testify and make this certification based upon personal knowledge. On this 10--day of iataifi` 1 , 2012, I deposited into the U.S. Mail with first class postage affixed, true and correct copies of IL!2'v(.&4jt,r btu Y i til. 1��aAv /`�y - in the above matter, addressed to: Adjacent Property Owners: See attached list. (Notices Only) Agencies: See attached list. Interested Parties: See attached list. Applicant/Representative-Posting Packet: 1 set of laminating sheets with Notices, Posting Instruction,Affidavit, and a copy of Notice. Newspapers (Notices Only) Official Posting Places(x3) Other: I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing certification is true and correct. Ai D this l(( day of 2012 at Port Townsend, Washington. II ii1E17.7.ezi Declar.+' G:\PLNCNTR\PLNCLERK\Fonns&Form Language\FRM Certification of Mailing updated 01-2012.docx JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE II LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA12-00141 APPLICANT: MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE LYNNE ROGERSON TRUSTEE 2133 OAK BAY RD PORT HADLOCK WA 98339-9778 Application Received Date: June 19, 2012 Application Complete Date: July 23, 2012 Application Notice Date: December 19, 2012 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 91 BALDWIN RD Parcel number 921 094 026, Lot 1, in Section 9, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM, located on Baldwin Rd, Nordland, WA 98358-9608 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: Three (3) Lot Short Plat with SEPA: The proposal is to subdivide 34.54-acres into three residential lots. Lot 1 will consist of 13.35-acres, Lot 2 will be 11.15-acres and Lot 3 will be 10.04 acres. Lot 1 has an existing single family residence and several detached out-buildings served by an on-site septic system and two on-site wells. Access to Lot 1 is via Baldwin Road. Lots 2 and 3 are vacant and will be accessed by Disney Road. The parcels are located within the Quimper public water system and Lots 2 & 3 would be served by an on-site septic system. A wetland has been identified on the parcel that spans all 3 of the proposed lots and requires a 60-foot buffer. Development of the lots will occur outside the wetland and its associated buffer. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on January 2, 2013. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION AND PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable development regulations, and the project review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an EIS is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold (final) determination may be obtained upon request, and will be mailed to any person commenting upon the notice of application. The SEPA Official has determined that: This will be the only opportunity to make comments related to SEPA. There will not be another comment period after the threshold (final) SEPA determination is made. If the threshold determination is a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) or a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS), parties of record may appeal the decision to the Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Notice of Decision. A Determination of Significance (DS) may not be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: This is a Type II Permit Application that is subject to SEPA review. There will not be a public hearing unless the final permit decision and/or the SEPA threshold determination by the Administrator is appealed to the Hearing Examiner. If an appeal hearing is scheduled, separate notice will be made at least 10 days prior to the hearing. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven calendar days prior to such a hearing. APPEALS: Appeals of SEPA decisions are described above in the SEPA Information and Preliminary Determination section. The final permit decision for this Type II permit application will be made by the Administrator. Parties of record may appeal the decision to the Hearing Examiner within 14 calendar days of the final Notice of Decision. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court. Project Planner: Michelle Farfan, 360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community Development web page at www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE II LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA12-00141 APPLICANT: MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE LYNNE ROGERSON TRUSTEE 2133 OAK BAY RD PORT HADLOCK WA 98339-9778 Application Received Date: June 19, 2012 Application Complete Date: July 23, 2012 Application Notice Date: December 19, 2012 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 91 BALDWIN RD Parcel number 921 094 026, Lot 1, in Section 9, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM, located on Baldwin Rd, Nordland, WA 98358-9608 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: Three (3) Lot Short Plat with SEPA: The proposal is to subdivide 34.54-acres into three residential lots. Lot 1 will consist of 13.35-acres, Lot 2 will be 11.15-acres and Lot 3 will be 10.04 acres. Lot 1 has an existing single family residence and several detached out-buildings served by an on-site septic system and two on-site wells. Access to Lot 1 is via Baldwin Road. Lots 2 and 3 are vacant and will be accessed by Disney Road. The parcels are located within the Quimper public water system and Lots 2 & 3 would be served by an on-site septic system. A wetland has been identified on the parcel that spans all 3 of the proposed lots and requires a 60-foot buffer. Development of the lots will occur outside the wetland and its associated buffer. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on January 2, 2013. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION AND PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable development regulations, and the project review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an EIS is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold (final) determination may be obtained upon request, and will be mailed to any person commenting upon the notice of application. The SEPA Official has determined that: This will be the only opportunity to make comments related to SEPA. There will not be another comment period after the threshold (final) SEPA determination is made. If the threshold determination is a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) or a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS), parties of record may appeal the decision to the Hearing Examiner within 14 days of the final Notice of Decision. A Determination of Significance (DS) may not be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: This is a Type II Permit Application that is subject to SEPA review. There will not be a public hearing unless the final permit decision and/or the SEPA threshold determination by the Administrator is appealed to the Hearing Examiner. If an appeal hearing is scheduled, separate notice will be made at least 10 days prior to the hearing. A copy of the staff report will be made available for inspection at no cost at least seven calendar days prior to such a hearing. APPEALS: Appeals of SEPA decisions are described above in the SEPA Information and Preliminary Determination section. The final permit decision for this Type II permit application will be made by the Administrator. Parties of record may appeal the decision to the Hearing Examiner within 14 calendar days of the final Notice of Decision. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner may not be further appealed except to Superior Court. Project Planner: Michelle Farfan, 360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community Development web page at www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 379-4450 POSTING INSTRUCTIONS Please post the attached notice on a 2-foot by 3-foot board provided by this department in a conspicuous location visible to vehicle traffic and pedestrians on or reasonably near the proposed development by December 19, 2012. The clear adhesive paper can be put over the notice after you mount it to protect it from the elements. Additional notice boards may be required where the site does not abut a public road, for a large site that abuts more than one (1) public road, or the Administrator determines that additional notice boards are necessary to provide adequate public notice. Notice boards shall be maintained in good and legible condition by the applicant during the notice period, be in place at least fifteen (15) calendar days prior to the date of the hearing, and be removed within fifteen (15) calendar days after the end of the notice period. Complete the affidavit, have it notarized, and return it to this office within three (3) days of posting. If the affidavit is not filed as required, any scheduled hearing or date by which the public may comment on the application will be postponed in order to allow compliance with this notice requirement. If you have any questions, please contact this office at (360) 379-4450. MLA number: MLA12-00141 Proponent(s): MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING PUBLIC NOTICE JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ORDINANCE #03-0702-01 State of Washington) County of Jefferson) , being duly sworn of oath say that I have posted one(1) public notice poster on or near the site identified in the following development description: PROPOSAL: Three (3) Lot Short Plat with SEPA: The proposal is to subdivide 34.54-acres into three residential lots. Lot 1 will consist of 13.35-acres, Lot 2 will be 11.15-acres and Lot 3 will be 10.04 acres. Lot 1 has an existing single family residence and several detached out-buildings served by an on-site septic system and two on-site wells. Access to Lot 1 is via Baldwin Road. Lots 2 and 3 are vacant and will be accessed by Disney Road. The parcels are located within the Quimper public water system and Lots 2 &3 would be served by an on-site septic system. A wetland has been identified on the parcel that spans all 3 of the proposed lots and requires a 60-foot buffer. Development of the lots will occur outside the wetland and its associated buffer. This notice was posted in full compliance with UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE on: the day of , 2012. (Signature of person posting notice) Subscribed and sworn to before me on this day of , 2012. Acknowledgement: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing in , Washington. My commission expires: NOTARY STAMP MLA Number: MLA12-00141 Proponent(s): MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE \\tidemark\datalforms\F_MLT_NtcAppl4_APO_U.rpt 12/12/2012 • Please publish one time. PUBLISH DATE: December 19, 2012 BILL: Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 ACCOUNT #15833 JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE II LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA12-00141 APPLICANT: MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE LYNNE ROGERSON TRUSTEE 2133 OAK BAY RD Port Hadlock WA 98339 Application Received Date: June 19, 2012 Application Complete Date: July 23, 2012 Application Notice Date: December 19, 2012 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 91 BALDWIN RD Parcel number 921 094 026, Lot 1, in Section 9, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM, located on Baldwin Rd, Nordland, WA 98358-9608 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: Three (3) Lot Short Plat with SEPA: The proposal is to subdivide 34 .54- acres into three residential lots. Lot 1 will consist of 13 .35-acres, Lot 2 will be 11. 15-acres and Lot 3 will be 10. 04 acres. Lot 1 has an existing single family residence and several detached out-buildings served by an on-site septic system and two on-site wells. Access to Lot 1 is via Baldwin Road. Lots 2 and 3 are vacant and will be accessed by Disney Road. The parcels are located within the Quimper public water system and Lots 2 & 3 would be served by an on-site septic system. A wetland has been identified on the parcel that spans all 3 of the proposed lots and requires a 60-foot buffer. Development of the lots will occur outside the wetland and its associated buffer. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment (s) /request (s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on January 2, 2013. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. Project Planner: Michelle Farfan, 360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community Development web page at www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_NtcAppl4 12/12/2012 • Please publish one time. PUBLISH DATE: December 19, 2012 BILL: Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE II LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA12-00141 APPLICANT: MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE LYNNE ROGERSON TRUSTEE 2133 OAK BAY RD PORT HADLOCK WA 98339-9778 Application Received Date: June 19, 2012 Application Complete Date: July 23, 2012 Application Notice Date: December 19, 2012 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 91 BALDWIN RD Parcel number 921 094 026, Lot 1, in Section 9, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM, located on Baldwin Rd, Nordland, WA 98358-9608 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: Three (3) Lot Short Plat with SEPA: The proposal is to subdivide 34.54-acres into three residential lots. Lot 1 will consist of 13.35-acres, Lot 2 will be 11.15-acres and Lot 3 will be 10.04 acres. Lot 1 has an existing single family residence and several detached out-buildings served by an on-site septic system and two on-site wells. Access to Lot 1 is via Baldwin Road. Lots 2 and 3 are vacant and will be accessed by Disney Road. The parcels are located within the Quimper public water system and Lots 2 & 3 would be served by an on-site septic system. A wetland has been identified on the parcel that spans all 3 of the proposed lots and requires a 60-foot buffer. Development of the lots will occur outside the wetland and its associated buffer. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on January 2, 2013. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. Project Planner: Michelle Farfan, 360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community Development web page at www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopmentl \\tidem a rk\datalform s1F_MLT_NtcApp 14_PU b_U.rpt 12/12/2012 921093015 921093024 MARY JO BOUSHIE KATHLEEN B MASON FRANK A BOUSHIE PO BOX 81 PO BOX 123 NORDLAND, WA 983580081 NORDLAND, WA 983580123 921094029 921094026 DONALD B DOUGLASS MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE LORNA I DOUGLASS LYNNE ROGERSON TRUSTEE 22501 45TH PL W MAUNEY/ROGERSON REV LIV T MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, WA 980434118 PORT HADLOCK, WA 983399778 921094010 921093003 BRADLEY T GONG DONALD J MAYNARD PAULA JONES GONG DIANE M MAYNARD 4704 DARLINGTON LN 761 ROBBINS RD EVERETT, WA 98203 NORDLAND, WA 983589673 921094008 921094027 KENNETH GORDHAMER KEVIN M MILLER LOUANN MARIE GORDHAMER SUSAN E MILLER PO BOX 157 191 DISNEY RD NORDLAND, WA 983580157 NORDLAND, WA 983589535 921094023 921094009 HUBER FAMILY TRUST LISA D S PETRICK 131 LIP LIP LN GARRON J PETRICK JR NORDLAND, WA 983589687 PO BOX 900 PORT HADLOCK, WA 983390900 921094002 921093021 KATHLEEN HUBER JOHNSON DAVID E SELF 131 LIP LIP LN CAROL J SELF NORDLAND, WA 983589687 PO BOX 419 PORT HADLOCK, WA 983390419 921094007 921094022 JOHN KOSCHNICK ROGER G TRAVIS GAYLE M KOSCHNICK SUSAN D TRAVIS 300 DISNEY RD 24 E MARROWSTONE RD NORDLAND, WA 983589609 NORDLAND, WA 983589614 921093018 DAVID L TURNER SUE ANN TURNER 174 BALDWIN RD NORDLAND, WA 983589608 921093016 LOIS N TWELVES PO BOX 51 NORDLAND, WA 983580051 921160000 WASHINGTON STATE PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION PO BOX 42650 OLYMPIA, WA 985042650 921094006 ERIC R YOUNG KIRSTIE A YOUNG 151 DISNEY RD NORDLAND, WA 983589535 921081011 1 �921092o;‘1,21'09272 - -- 42109202291092130921092017 i 921092018 j� 1 977700098 I 977700033 � � 977700033 g�/770007 921081011921081001-- r P 977700096 9777000 921081015 1 { j —..— w.._ — i 1 1 977700038 , ,--- 921081016 921092009 I,---- ..._.____._ 921092008 ` 921092081 ( I 977700038 / _,— L 1 I 921081017 921092020 ' �i 977 0704 r —_ � g77f700046�77700039 921092007 921092010 j 921092016 i I- 977700043 147#01041. 1 4104 00086 .__.- (00 921081025 I i � I 977700050 19 700 0 0 4 I 921081028 977700051 /9 77000 1977700047 } — _.— �--- __I 977700048 921081027 921092011 921092012 I 921092082 11 77fl004$ 977700051 17770005797770054 ■ i_-_ _ 97770005E —-- — 921092076 76 — '977700063 921092077 i L—�— T X31094014,• 921084035 1 � I 5� ;921094031192109403 210403319210940188�92,921094015\N_ I I i 921094 9931094015 921084036 1 1 _ _ I. 1_ _ '\92102¢20 921092079 i 921092078 { i 210940 921093004 11 1 921094018 1F 01 4 921084018 — 921094005 .-.. — ) 921094025 921084017 �2fQ $2 _! 921093013 921093003 1 1 1 — '1- - I 1 921094013 921084006921084005 f 921094022'1 I i 921094023/21094021 i 921084007 921093002 9210402 / — . I 92,1094429 ,2 921094012 921084032 1 921094011/ LL 921093015 13210940y0 3 921093005 21092019 X21 94007911094008 9210840719 9211,093009 . 921091009 952yDOQ10_.' � I 1 921093016 1 b05921083014 1 921094026 �' 3525f10p1ti 2109302921093, 9210930112 ',./95250001'1 921093021 92 4��3 j I 921093022 � 92684022 i 921093024 i.- 921084001', ' 921093017— II I .. 921093023 1 921093011 — 921b9019 921170004 — —+ 1 921160000-' l \\ 921160000 SUB12-00011 SUB12-00011 MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE TERRY MCHUGH LYNNE ROGERSON TRUSTEE P 0 BOX 441 2133 OAK BAY RD PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 PORT HADLOCK, WA 98339-9778 SUB12-00011 SUB12-00011 *CHIMACUM SCHOOL DISTRICT 49 * CITY OF PT- BLD/COMM DEV P 0 BOX 278 250 MADISON ST, STE 3 CHIMACUM, WA 98325 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 SUB12-00011 SUB12-00011 *DOE SEPA REVIEW *DOE WETLANDS SEPAUNIT @ECY.WA.GOV RICK MRAZ OLYMPIA, WA 98504-7703 PO BOX 47775 OLYMPIA, WA 98504-7775 SUB12-00011 SUB12-00011 *HOH INDIAN TRIBE *JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE BOB SMITH LEANN JENKINS PO BOX 2196 1033 OLD BLYN HIGHWAY FORKS,WA 98331 SEQUIM,WA 98382 SUB12-00011 SUB12-00011 *JEFFERSON CO ASSESSOR *JEFFERSON CO HEALTH DEPT SHERRIE SHOLD SUSAN PORTO SUB12-00011 SUB12-00011 *JEFFERSON CO PUBLIC WORKS *JEFFERSON CO PUBLIC WORKS JIM PEARSON TERRY DUFF SUB12-00011 SUB12-00011 *JEFFERSON CO PUD#1 *JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR ATTN: BILL GRAHAM PAT PERRYMAN PO BOX 929 PORT HADLOCK,WA 98339 SUB12-00011 SUB12-00011 *JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH *JEFFERSON TRANSIT RANDY MARX 1615 W. SIMS WAY PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 SUB12-00011 SUB12-00011 *POINT NO POINT TREATY COUNCIL * PORT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE JACKIE MCLAUGHLIN JESSICA COYLE 7999 NE SALISH LANE 31912 LITTLE BOSTON RD NE KINGSTON, WA 98346 KINGSTON, WA 98346 SUB12-00011 SUB12-00011 *PORT OF PORT TOWNSEND * PORT TOWNSEND LEADER PO BOX 1180 ALISON ARTHUR PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 PO BOX 552 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 • SUB12-00011 SUB12-00011 *QUILEUTE NATION *QUINAULT INDIAN NATION PO BOX 279 MARK MOBBS LA PUSH, WA 98350 PO BOX 189 TAHOLA,WA 98587 SUB12-00011 SUB12-00011 * SKOKOMISH TRIBE * SKOKOMISH TRIBE KRIS MILLER RANDY N LUMPER, M.E.S. 80 N TRIBAL CENTER RD 541 NORTH TRIBAL CENTER ROAD SKOKOMISH, WA 98584 SKOKOMISH, WA 98584 SUB12-00011 SUB12-00011 * SUQUAMISH TRIBE *WA STATE DNR SEPA REVIEW ALISON O'SULLIVAN SEPACENTER @DNR.WA.GOV PO BOX 498 PO BOX 47015 SUQUAMISH, WA 98392 OLYMPIA,WA 98504-7015 SUB12-00011 SUB12-00011 *WA STATE DEPT OF ARCH & HIST PRES * PENINSULA DAILY NEWS GRETCHEN KAEHLER CHARLIE BERMANT 1063 S. CAPITOL WAY, SUITE 106 1939 E SIMS WAY OLYMPIA, WA 98501 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 SUB12-00011 SUB12-00011 *EAST JEFFERSON FIRE& RESCUE * US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 40 SETON ROAD CENWS-OD-RG ATTN: J L GARDINER PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 P 0 BOX 3755 SEATTLE, WA 98124-3755 SUB12-00011 SUB12-00011 WDFW SEPA REVIEW BOCC SEPADESK @DFW.WA.GOV 1111 WASHINGTON ST. SE. OLYMPIA, WA 98504-3135 ,SON co JEFFERSON COUNTY 44 °��, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street I Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.iefferson.wa.uslcommunitvdevelopment �Y' Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 Email:dcdt co.iefferson.wa.us 16'4'1NGrS° Building Permits&Inspections I Development Consistency Review I Long Range Planning( Watershed Stewardship Resource Center December 141, 2012 Dear Reviewer, RE: MLA12-00141 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: Three (3) Lot Short Plat with SEPA: The proposal is to subdivide 34.54-acres into three residential lots. Lot 1 will consist of 13.35-acres, Lot 2 will be 11.15-acres and Lot 3 will be 10.04 acres. Lot 1 has an existing single family residence and several detached out-buildings served by an on-site septic system and two on-site wells. Access to Lot 1 is via Baldwin Road. Lots 2 and 3 are vacant and will be accessed by Disney Road. The parcels are located within the Quimper public water system and Lots 2 & 3 would be served by an on-site septic system. A wetland has been identified on the parcel that spans all 3 of the proposed lots and requires a 60-foot buffer. Development of the lots will occur outside the wetland and its associated buffer. This proposal is subject to environmental review and threshold determination under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). Location: Parcel number 921 094 026, Lot 1, in Section 9, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM, located on Baldwin Rd, Nordland, WA 98358-9608 Comments must be received within fourteen (14) calendar days or by JAn vary', O)3.. If no written response has been received within fourteen (14)days, your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary, the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact at(360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, I � � _� ; , n Ii� Michelle Farfan )y ica, C,Q.o .1 • eV'svrr , i-) . v s cc:, \\tidemark\d ata\forms\F_MLT_ReviewerLtr.rpt 12/12/2012 Michelle Farfan From: Legals Email [legals @ptleader.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 2:41 PM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: Re: MLA12-00141 Publish 12/19/2012 Michelle, Your legal ad request has been received and your ad(s) will publish on the date(s) stated in your email. We are setting the referenced ad for publication on the dates requested, however we will only be able to provide an estimate of costs until the ad is actually published and measured. Our estimates will give you a figure close to the actual cost. Important Note: Affidavits are issued only after full payment has been received. After the ad is first published and measured you will be sent a Pre-bill to assist you with your payment for our services and publication of your legal ad. Leader Readers are everywhere! 70 percent of north Jefferson County homes are Leader Readers... 17,500 locals each week... 23,000 people use PTLeader.com each week. Thank you and have a great day, Donna Rosmaier Legal Coordinator The Leader 226 Adams St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360)385-2900 on 12/12/12 2:25 PM, Michelle Farfan at mfarfanco.jefferson.wa.us wrote: � W 4 Hi: Please publish the attached legal notice in the 12/19/2012 edition of the Leader. Please confirm receipt of this email. Thanks. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner, FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan@co.iefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) All voice messages and e-mails received by Jefferson County may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 Please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am - 4:30 pm Monday to Thursday and closed on Fridays. 2 Michelle Farfan From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 2:26 PM To: 'Legals Email' Subject: MLA12-00141 Publish 12/19/2012 Attachments: mla12-00141 NOA.doc Hi: Please publish the attached legal notice in the 12/19/2012 edition of the Leader. Please confirm receipt of this email. Thanks. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner,YHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 62.2 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan@cojefferson.wa.us 36o-379-4457 36o-379-4473(fax) All voice messages and e-mails received by Jefferson County may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56RCW. Please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am -4:30 pm Monday to Thursday and closed on Fridays. 1 Please publish one time. PUBLISH DATE: December 19, 2012 BILL: Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 ACCOUNT #15833 JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE II LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA12-00141 APPLICANT: MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE LYNNE ROGERSON TRUSTEE 2133 OAK BAY RD Port Hadlock WA 98339 Application Received Date: June 19, 2012 Application Complete Date: July 23, 2012 Application Notice Date: December 19, 2012 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 91 BALDWIN RD Parcel number 921 094 026, Lot 1, in Section 9, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM, located on Baldwin Rd, Nordland, WA 98358-9608 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES; Three (3) Lot Short Plat with SEPA: The proposal is to subdivide 34.54-acres into three residential lots. Lot 1 will consist of 13.35-acres, Lot 2 will be 11.15-acres and Lot 3 will be 10.04 acres. Lot 1 has an existing single family residence and several detached out-buildings served by an on-site septic system and two on-site wells. Access to Lot 1 is via Baldwin Road. Lots 2 and 3 are vacant and will be accessed by Disney Road. The parcels are located within the Quimper public water system and Lots 2 & 3 would be served by an on-site septic system. A wetland has been identified on the parcel that spans all 3 of the proposed lots and requires a 60-foot buffer. Development of the lots will occur outside the wetland and its associated buffer. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persona are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on January 2, 2013. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION, The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. Project Planner: Michelle Farfan, 360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community Development web page at www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ \\tidemark\data\forma\F_MLT_NtcAppl4 12/12/2012 Michelle Farfan From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 12:22 PM To: 'Terry McHugh'; 'Marc Mauney/Lynne Rogerson' Subject: Short Plat (MLA12-141) Hi Terry & Marc: Thank you Terry for providing me with the additional colored copies of the wetland delineation from Loggy. I am working on the notice of application with SEPA this week to be published on 12/19/12 edition of the Leader. I will send Terry the posting packet to post the notice and sign the affidavit of posting unless I am directed to send it to Marc. The posting packet should be mailed out this Friday, 12/21. I will be out of the office on 12/17 (my husband is having a total knee replacement) but should be back in the office on 12/18. Please let me know if you have any questions or if I should send the posting packet to Marc instead of Terry. Thanks. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner,FHM Lead Dept. OF Community Development 622 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @coiieFferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) All voice messages and e-mails received by Jefferson CountY maY be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56RCW. please note that DCD hours changed as of December i, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am - 4:3o pm Monday to Thursday and closed on Fridays. 1 December 12, 2012 MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE LYNNE ROGERSON TRUSTEE 2133 OAK BAY RD PORT HADLOCK WA 98339-9778 RE: SITE ADDRESS: 91 BALDWIN RD MLA#: MLA12-00141 Dear MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE: Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff has reviewed the application materials for the above project proposal and has determined that the application is substantially complete. Additional information needed for project review may be requested in writing by the Director or Project Planner. Please call the Department of Community Development if you have any questions. Sincerely, Department of Community Development Staff c: File TERRY MCHUGH P 0 BOX 441 PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368 Michelle Farfan From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 9:53 AM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: MLA12-00141 Mauney wetland review Michelle: I have reviewed the wetland report prepared by Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting for the Mauney/Rogerson parcel (921094026), dated November 2012 and submitted December 6, 2012. Based on observations made during two previous site visits to the property, I agree with the wetland delineation and wetland rating. Please be aware that site plans submitted for this application should show the wetland and the 60-foot wetland buffer. The SNR report previously submitted should not be used for project permitting. Let me know if you have any questions. Dovuui Frost-ha-inn Associate Planner/WetlandSpeciaCist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Timnsend,"Washington 98368 afrosthohn@cojefferson.iva.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails maybe subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. 1 LAND LAND SURVEYING - 235 kir[h t r/]b;lrenue • P.O.Boa 2199 MAPPING LAND 1i�quim. llush/n ton 98382 DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING 1 o/kre (360) 681-2161 • Fax(360)683-5310 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEN T OFFICE /)„„e 1-888-681-2161 • E-mail:info @clarkland.com PLLC DQEC � � X11 EFEERSo tIr o? to LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Ms. Michelle Farfan Date: December 10, 2012 Jefferson County Dept. of Comm. Development Re: Preliminary Short Plat for 621 Sheridan Mauney/Rogerson Trust Port Townsend, WA 98368 Enclosed are the following items: Copies Date Description 8 of Sheet 2 18 X 24 Copies of Prelim. S.P. for Mauney/Rogerson Trust 1 of Sheet 2 8 ;'2 x 11 Reduced copy of Prelim. S.P. for Mauney/Rogerson Trust Please feel free to call if you have any questions. Signed Ind! L. Sharon Stevens for Scot B. Clark, PLS Michelle Farfan From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 11:27 AM To: 'Terry McHugh' Subject: Mauney Wetland Delineation for short plat Hi Terry: I received the updated new wetland report prepared by Loggy. is it possible for you to get a colored PDF to send to me so I can print out a couple more copies to provide to Donna and the state? Thanks Terry. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner,FHM Lead Dept. of CommunitY Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @coiefferson.wa.us 360.379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) All voice messages and e-mails received by Jefferson County maY be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56RCW. Please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am -4:30 Pm Monday to Thursday and closed on Fridays. 1. Michelle Farfan From: Susan Porto Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 4:13 PM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: FW: Mauney 3-lot short plat; Baldwin & Disney Roads, N (MLA12-00141 / SUB12-00011 Attachments: FW: SUB12-23 potable water review Importance: High I indicated I was okay with the e-mail submitted to you but I forgot to sign off water in the case. From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 12:12 PM To: Susan Porto Subject: Mauney 3-lot short plat; Baldwin & Disney Roads, N (MLA12-00141 / SUB12-00011 Importance: High Hi Susan: I hand carried the water utility service form to you on 2/4/13. I was wondering if you have had a chance to review it. Water sign off is all I'm waiting on to issue the short plat. Please let me know if you can possible do that today. I would like to get this one done before I'm gone for a while. Thanks. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner,FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473(Fax) All voice messages and e-mails received by Jefferson County maY be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1, zoos. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am -4:30 pm Monday to Thursday and closed on Fridays. 1 I El Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting W. David Loggy, CPSS and Wetland Specialist I P.O. Box 2347, Port Angeles,WA 98362 Phone:360-457-3920—Fax:360-457-0131 CPSS y Email:wdploggy@olypen.com I Web Page:Olypen.com/wdploggy VW Specializing in: Soil Mapping and Classification I ti;,;l , ;.,,,;,, Soil Investigations— Soil Site Analysis Wetland Mapping,Delineation and Restoration Soil Redox Potential Monitoring for Hydric Soil Determination I ' r I WETLAND CRITICAL AREA STUDY RESULTS CONDUCTED ON PROPERTY ILocated in a portion of Section 9 T.29N,R.1 E,W.M., IJefferson County,Washington Parcel Numbers: 921094026 ' Title Owner: Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T 2133 Oak Bay Road Port Hadlock,WA 98339-9778 1 Study Requested By: Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T I 2133 Oak Bay Road Port Hadlock,WA 98339-9778 IProposed Land Action: Short Plat Study Name: Mauney/Rogerson 921094026 I Regulatory Agency Jefferson County Department of Community Development ' Reference For Study: Jefferson County Code 18.22 Article VII VECEOVLE H J Study Conducted By: Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting ! I 1 U 2012 ' W. David Loggy, CPSS I Li 1! P.O. Box 2347 I JEFFERSON COUNTY IPort Angeles, WA 98362-0303 DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT(360)457-3920 November 2012 I I ' TABLE OF CONTENTS I Page I CONSULTING COMPANY 1 TYPE OF CRITICAL AREA INVESTIGATION 1 LAND OWNER 1 APPLICANT 1 I PROPOSED PROJECT 1 PARCEL NUMBER 1 SITE LOCATION 1 IA.METHODS AND APPROACH 2 B.NON-WETLAND AREA I 1.EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS 2-4 i.Landscape Position 2 ii.Slope gradient 2 I iii.Geologic Materials 2 iv.Water Types present 2 v.Non-wetland Plots 1,2,3&4 2 vi.Vegetation Cover 3 I vii.Soils 3-4 viii.Water source For Soil Hydrology 4 I C.WETLAND AREA 1.EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS 4-7 i.Landscape Position 4 ii.Slope gradient 4 I iii. Geologic Materials 4 iv.Water Types present 4 v.Wetland Plots 1,2,3&4 4 I vi.Vegetation Cover 5 vii.Soils 5-7 viii. Water source For Soil Hydrology 4 ' D.CRITICAL AREA DETERMINATION,CLASSIFICATION&DELINEATION 8-10 TABLES ITABLE ONE—DOMINATE VEGETATION ON UPLAND PLOT SITES 3 TABLE TWO—DOMINATE VEGETATION ON WETLAND PLOT SITES 5 I TABLE THREE—WETLAND CATEGORY RATING SCORES S TABLE FOUR—SPECIAL WETLAND IDENTIFIED TYPES 8 TABLE FIVE—WETLAND HGM CLASS RATINGS&WETLAND CATEGORY 9 IAPPENDICES APPENDIX A—FIELD DATA SHEETS ' APPENDIX B—WETLAND RATING SHEETS APPENDIX C—DRAWINGS AND MAPS I 1 I 1 PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK I 1 I r ' WETLAND CRITICAL AREA STUDY RESULTS ' CONSULTING COMPANY: Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting TYPE OF CRITICAL AREA INVESTIGATION: Wetlands ILAND OWNER OR PURCHASER: Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T 2133 Oak Bay Road ' Port Hadlock, WA 98339-9778 APPLICANT: Mauney/Rogerson REV LW T I 2133 Oak Bay Road Port Hadlock, WA 98339-9778 PROPOSED PROJECT: Short Plat ITAX PARCEL NUMBER(S): 921094026 ISITE LOCATION: LEGAL LOCATION: ISTREET ADDRESS: 91 Baldwin Road Nordland,WA 98339-9778 IROAD ROUTE INSTRUCTIONS: I Starting from Port Townsend travel south on SR 20 to South SR 19. Then take South SR 19 to East SR 116 past Indian Island to Marrowstone Island. At the intersection of East SR 116 and Robbins Road take Robbins Road south and then east to the intersection of Baldwin Road,East Marrowstone Road and Disney Road. At the intersection take Baldwin Road to 91 Baldwin Road I or continue east on Disney Road to the large pasture on the south side of Disney Road(Figure 1 and 2 below). ]TM 1 ., rirl t r '�"SM"I :.4 — I *en 1 �. f P !K 10, ,,, \,1 'r N. 1e "° 1 � � ' ` -.Jefitrson- - 'f d int fi . I ®-'" . P 0 . 1r Not Scaled \../ .hn%iI .w�. ! ' Figure 1 —Site location of the project. Figure 2—Property Project Area IMauney/Rogerson 1 LSWC November 2012 ' • A. METHODS,APPROACH AND REGULATORY OVERSIGHT Two levels of information were gathered to do a routine wetland determination. These included: a)Review of preliminary site data and, b)On-site investigation to determine the presence of wetlands and non-wetland waters. A review of existing information was conducted to develop background knowledge of physical features,and to identify the potential for wetland and other water occurrences on the subject ' property. The resource documents available for preliminary review of the site conditions included: USDA Soil Conservation Service(SCS), "Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area Washington",(1194-2011)aerial photography of Jefferson County,Jefferson County Planning ' Department critical area data base information and U.S Fish and Wildlife NW1 maps. During the on-site investigation,the wetland was identified and delineated on the basis of three ' parameters: Hydrophytic Vegetation,Hydric Soils,and Wetland Hydrology,as recommended using the Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation 1987 Manual for Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region,U.S.Army Corps of Engineers, ERDC/EL TR-08-13,April 2008 and the wetland were rated using the Washington State ' Rating System for Western Washington Revised (Washington State Department of Ecology, Ecology Publication#04-06-025,August 2004). ' Four non-wetland sites were sampled and described. Six(6)wetland sample sites were established to describe the wetland vegetation, soils and hydrology. Five of the plots were as close as could be established to sample plots site done by the SNR Company on June 6,2011. 1 ' B.NON-WETLAND AREA 1 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS: ' i.Landscape Position: Gentle sloping plain. ' ii. Slope Gradient: 0 to 5 percent iii. Geological Material: Till and glacial outwash ' iv.Water Types Present Non-regulated drainage ditch ' v.Non-wetland Plots 1,2,3 & 4. The following provides general information on plant species, soils and hydrology for the four(4)non-wetland sample sites that define the non-wetland area on the property. Detailed vegetation, soils and hydrology is recorded on the field data sheets for the four(4)non-wetlands sample site and can be viewed in Appendix B. Mauney/Rogerson 2 LSWC November 2012 I EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED ' vi.Vegetation Cover: Two narrow areas of native trees and shrubs occur along the north east and north west half of the property while the remaining portion of the upland is native and non-native ' herbaceous. The species listed in Table One presents the dominate species recorded on each sample plot. ITABLE ONE DOMINATE VEGETATION ON UPLAND PLOT SITES* IPLOT VEG. COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME PLANT PERCENT COVER INDICATOR COVER I STATUS 1 Trees Douglas fir Pseudotsuga douglasii FACU 30 I Shrubs Nootka rose Rosa nutkana FAC 25 Salmonberry Rubus procerus FACU 25 Grasses Dactylis glomerata Orchard grass FACU 60 Holcus lanatus Common velvetgrass FAC 20 ITall fescue Festuca arundinacea FAC 20 2 Trees Douglas fir Pseudotsuga douglasii FACU _ 30 I Shrubs Salal Nootka rose – Gaultheria shallop FACU — 20 Rosa nutkana FAC 25 Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis FAC 20 I 3 Forbs& Rib plantain Plantago lanceolata FAC 20 grasses Tall fescue Festuca arundinacea FAC 25 ' Scab fescue Festuca scabra FAC 35 4 Forbs& Rib plantain Plantago lanceolata FAC 25 I grasses Scab fescue Festuca scabra FAC 30 Tall fescue Festuca arundinacea FAC 25 Only the dominate species are presented in this table which determines hydrophytic under the dominance test. Ivii.Soils I NRCS Soil Map Unit and Series: Whidbey Series' Field Identified Series or Classification: Plot 1 -Indianola Series Plot 2–Whidbey Series I Plot 3 -Indianola Series Plot 4–Indianola Series I ' Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area,Washington, 1975.Fred R.McCreary,United States Department of Agriculture,Soil conservation Service,in cooperation with the Washington Agricultural Experiment Station. IMauney/Rogerson 3 LSWC November 2012 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED ' Soil Depth: Very deep Soil Drainage: Somewhat excessively to excessively ' drained. General Soil Profile Surface and subsurface: Ranges from 6 to 23 inches thick. The horizons are sandy loam, loamy fine sand, loamy sand, gravelly ' loamy sand, sand or very gravely sandy loam. The horizons have hue of 10YR, 7.YR,or 2.5Y,value 2 through 4 moist,chroma of 1 through 4 moist. The horizons have granular or subangular blocky structure. ' Subsoil: Ranges from 10 to 18 inches thick with textures of very gravelly sands,gravelly sands or sand. The horizons ' have hue of 10YR, 7.YR,or 2.5Y,value 3 through 5 moist,chroma of 1 through 4 moist. The horizons have subangular blocky structure or are single grain. Substratum: Starts at 30 to 31 inches from the soil surface. It has textures of very gravelly very fine sand,sand or gravelly ' sand. It is massive or loose single grain. If sand is present 5YR 4/6 color lamellae may be present. viii. Water Source For ' Soil Hydrology: Precipitation C.WETLAND AREA ' 1 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS: i.Landscape Position: Includes gentle sloping plain, flat and depressional. ' ii. Slope Gradient: 0 to 5 percent ' iii. Geological Material: Glacial outwash iv.Water Type Present: Non-regulated drainage ditches ' v.Wetland Plots 1,2,3,4,5 & 6. The following provides general information on plant species, soils and hydrology for the six(6)wetland sample sites that ' define the wetland area on the property. Detailed vegetation, soils and hydrology is recorded on the field data sheets for the six(6)wetland sample sites and can be viewed in Appendix B. 1 Mauney/Rogerson 4 LSWC November 2012 I EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED ' vi.Vegetation Cover: The vegetation on the wetland area consists of native and non- native herbaceous and native shrubs. ' TABLE ONE DOMINATE VEGETATION ON WETLAND PLOT SITES* IPLOT VEG. COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME PLANT PERCENT COVER INDICATOR COVER I STATUS 1 Grasses Rib plantain Plantago lanceolate FAC 30 &Forbs Tall fescue Festuca arundinacea FAC 40 ' Common velvetgrass Holus lanatus FAC 20 2 Grasses Slough sedge Carex obnupta OBL 30 ' Soft rush Juncus effusus FACW 20 Red top Agrostis gigantea FAC 30 Common velvetgrass Holus lanatus FAC 20 I3 Grasses Common velvetgrass Holus lanatus FAC 20 &Forbs Tall fescue Festuca arundinacea FAC 25 ' Soft rush Juncus effusus FACW 20 Rib plantain Plantago lanceolate FAC 15 4 Grasses Reed canarygrass Phalaris arundinacea FACW 30 I Soft rush Juncus effusus FACW 20 Slough sedge Carex obnupta OBL 30 Red top Agrostis gigantea FAC 30 I5 Grasses Tall fescue Festuca arundinacea FAC 20 &Forbs Soft rush Juncus effusus FACW 40 I 6 Grasses Common velvetgrass Holus lanatus FAC 25 Soft rush Juncus effusus FACW 20 Red top Agrostis gigantea FAC 25 *Only the dominate species are presented in this table which determines hydrophytic under the dominance test. Ivii.Soils NRCS Soil Map Unit and Series: Whidbey Series and Jan Juan Series' ' Field Identified Map Unit or Series: Plots 1-6-Aquultic Haploxerolls Soil Depth: Very deep ISoil Drainage: Somewhat Poorly I ' Mauney/Rogerson 5 LSWC November 2012 I EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED ' Hydric Soil Indicators: All —Depleted Below Dark Surface and Al2—Thick Dark Surface General Soil Profile ISurface and subsurface: Ranges from 9 to 20 inches thick. The horizons have sandy loam, loamy sand or loam textures. The horizons I have hue of l OYR or 7.5YR,value 2 moist,chroma of 1 or less moist. The horizons have granular or subangular blocky structure. Photo 1 below shows redoximorphic I concentrations and also oxidized rhizospheres along living roots that can be present in the lower part of the subsurface.The dark soil color mask most of the Iredoximorphic co_n_.......„..„„centrations. Photo 1 I �OXIdiZed R .Reaoxirrorptic Features I I I I Subsoil: Depleted soils that Range from 34 to 55 inches thick with textures of very fine sands,fine sands or sand. The first 6 to 10 inches of the subsoil is slightly hard moist. The I horizons have hue of 10YR or 2.5Y,value 4 through 6 moist,chroma of 1 or 2 moist. Depth of redoximorphic features range from 9 to greater than 64 inches. The horizons have subangular blocky structure or massive I with both parting to single grain. Some dark color krotovina occur as thin horizontal bands or irregular tunnel cross sections2. IPhoto 2 below shows a cross section of the Aquultic Haploxerolls hydric soil within the wetland showing the Ithick mollic surface and subsurface,the redoximorphic ' 2 Krotovina is an animal burrow that has been filled with organic or mineral material from another soil horizon. ' Mauney/Rogerson 6 LSWC November 2012 I IEXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED Iand krotovina features in the underlying subsoil and water table in the wetland.. I Photo 2 Sample Site 3 —26 Nov 12—Water table fmally leveled at approximately 36 inches. M 4r " ci 14 ' 1 r A I I I viii.Water Source For ISoil Hydrology: Direct precipitation and surface runoff and subsurface saturated flow from precipitation. I One process causing the wetland is the slightly hard sand lithologic discontinuity subsoil surface causing a restricting downward water movement into the subsoils I allowing saturated flows to be maintained longer in the surface and subsurface soils. I The upland Whidbey and Indianola Series soils supply subsurface flow to the wetland area. Aquic conditions on the area appear to be the result of an intermittent I episaturation soil condition and a longer endosaturation soil condition. I I I IMauney/Rogerson 7 LSWC November 2012 I C.WETLAND DETERMINATION,CLASSIFICATION&DELINEATION 1 ' WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY REVISED 2004 WETLAND RATING SYSTEM FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON WETLAND—Mauney/Rogerson Section 1 Township.29 North Range 01 East Date: November 2012 TABLE THREE Wetland Category Rating Scores Category I=Score<70 ' Category H=Score 51-69 Category EEL=Score 30-50 Category IV= Score<30 ' TABLE FOUR SPECIAL WETLAND IDENTIFIED TYPES ' ❑ Estuarine I❑ H 111 till ❑ ❑ Natural Heritage I❑ ❑ Bog I❑ ' ❑ Mature Forest I❑ ❑ Old Growth Forest I❑ ❑ Coastal Lagoon I❑ II❑ ❑ Interdunal II❑ III ❑ ® None of the above 1 1 1 1 Mauney/Rogerson 8 LSWC November 2012 I ' WETLAND DETERMINATION,CLASSIFICATION&DELINEATION CONTINUED ' TABLE FIVE WETLAND HGM CLASS RATINGS AND WETLAND CATEGORY ' WETLAND Mauney/Rogerson I WETLAND HGM CLASSES Depressional3 ' FUNCTIONS POINTS FOR WETLAND HGM CLASS 1 Notes WATER QUALITY FUNCTION 1.Potential to Improve 7 ' 2.Opportunity Improve(Yes,2 x points in 1) 2 (No,1 x points in 1) TOTAL WATER QUALITY FUNCTION 14 ' HYDROLOGIC FUNCTION 1.Potential for Decreasing Flooding and 6 Erosion 2.Opportunity for Decreasing Flooding and 1 ' Erosion.(Yes,2 x points in 1),(No,1 x points in 1) TOTAL HYDROLOGY FUNCTION 6 ' HABITAT FUNCTION 1.Potential for Habitat 5 2.Opportunity for Habitat 10 TOTAL HABITAT FUNCTION 15 ' TOTAL SCORE I 35 III FINAL CATEGORY ' 1.WETLAND DELINEATION The wetland boundary is marked with 3"x 5"orange plastic wire whips. The wetland whips are consecutively numbered. The whips have the station numbers,the date the boundary was established and the lettering LSWC indicating Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting as the delineator. Each wetland whip has an orange wetland boundary ribbon attached to it. ' The wetland area associated with the tax parcel is shown in the preliminary survey plat drawing in Appendix C. The bearings and distances of the wetland stations for the wetland boundary in the drawing of this report were established by survey preformed by field traverse methods using a 5 second ' Topcon GTS-235W total station and steel tape. I I 3 The wetland contains flat,slope and depressional HGM Classes within its boundary. The Depressional HGM Class was used for rating the wetland category. ' Mauney/Rogerson 9 LSWC November 2012 WETLAND DETERMINATION,CLASSIFICATION&DELINEATION CONTINUED ' 2.WETLAND BUFFER The short platting of the parcel will provide additional parcels that proposes to have single-family residential use on each parcels of one(1)acre or larger. The parcel size meets the wetland category for moderate impact land use(JCC 18.22.330 Table 18.22.330(2)). Under moderate impact land use the buffer for this Category III wetland is 60 feet because the habitat function score(Table 5)is less than the 20-28 points required to have the maximum buffer of 110 feet. 1 1 1 Mauney/Rogerson 10 LSWC November 2012 1 1 1 PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK APPENDIX A ' FIELD DATA SHEETS 1 t 1 I ' WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Regions Project/Site: Mauney/Rogerson Marrowstone Parcel 921094026 City/County:/Jefferson Sampling Date:5 Nov 12 I Applicant/Owner: Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T State: WA Sampling Point: Upland Plot 1 Investigator(s):W.David Loggy,Loggy Wetlands&Soil Consulting Section,Township,Range: SEI/4,S9,T29N,RI E Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc):low gradient outwash slope Local relief(concave,convex,none): straight slope I Slope(%)0-2 Subregion(LRR):A I Lat:N 48.01565 I Long:W-122.67648 I Datum:WGS 84 I Soil Map Unit Name: Whidbey Series(See soil remarks on 2"page,) NWI classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are vegetation 0, Soil ❑,or Hydrology ®significantly disturbed?No Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ I Are vegetation ❑, Soil 0,or Hydrology ❑naturally problematic? No (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is the Sampled Area ' Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® Within a Wetland? Yes 0 No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No El Remarks: I VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Trees Stratum (50'r Plot size: ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)3 I I.Pseudotsuga douglasii 30 Yes FACU 2.Alnus rubra 10 No FAC Total;Number of dominant Species Across All Strata: (B)6 I 3. Percent of Dominant Species 4 That Are OBL,FCW,or FAC: (AB)50 40%=Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: ' Sapline/Shrub Stratum(15'R Plot size) Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 1.Rosa nutkana 25 Yes FAC OBL species X 1 = I 2.Rubus procerus 25 Yes FACU FACW species X 2= 3. FAC species X 3= 4. FACU species X 4= ' 5. UPL Species X 5 = 4. Column totals (A) (B) I 5.. Prevalence index-B/A— 50%=Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ 1.Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ' Herb Stratum (5'r Plot size:) 1.Dactylis glomerata 60 Yes FACU ❑2.Dominance Test is>50% 2.Holcus lanatus 20 Yes FAC 1 3.Festuca arundinacea 4. 20 Yes FAC ❑3.Prevalence Index is<3.0' ❑4.Morphological Adaptations'(Provide 5 supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) I 67.. ❑5.Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 8. ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' I9, (Explain) 100%=Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size) be present. I 1. 2. Hydrophytic Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes CI No ' Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: The site plot was one of the sites for septic field site. The pit was within a shrub area on the edge of the forest area. ' ITS Army Corns of Rnoineers Western Mountains.Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 ' SOIL Sampling Point: Upland Plot 1 Profile Description: (Describe t o the depth needed to document the indicators or confirm the absence of indicators) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Typet Loc2 Textures Remarks 0 to 9 7.5YR 3/2 Is Weak fine granular/many fine,medium and I common course roots/cw bndy 9 to 21 7.5YR 3/4 s weak fine granular parting to single grain/ many fine,medium and common course roots /cw bndy ' 21 to 31 2.5Y 4/3 s Single grain/loose dry/many very fine and fine roots/cw bndy 31 to 40 7.5YR 4/3 s Massive parting to single grain/this horizon ' has 5YR 4/6 continuous and discontinuous one inch wide lamellae/slightly hard when moist 'Type:C Concentrations,D Depletion.RM=Reduced Matrix.CXS Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: P1=Pore lining, RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix 1 3. Hydric Soil Indicators.(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils ❑Histosol(Al) ❑Sandy Redox(SS) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) ' ❑Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(Fl)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks 3 ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) II ' ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral(Sl) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ['Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. ' Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Depth(inches): Remarks:The soil at the site is not Whidbey Series as shown on Jefferson County Survey. It is sandy but lacks gravel in the profile to be the ' San Juan or Whidbey Series. It is an excessively drained soil because of the sandy textures HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) ' ❑ Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water Stained Leaves(B9)(MRLA 1,2, ❑High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A and 4B) ❑ Saturation(A3) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ' ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) (C9) ❑Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) ' ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils(C6) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl')(LRR A) ❑FAC=Neutral Test(D5) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) ❑Other(Explain in remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ' El Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface(B8) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) I Field Observations Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): ' Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No (includes capillary fringe) _ ' Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: I US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 IWETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Regions Project/Site: Mauney/Rogerson Marrowstone Parcel 921094026 City/County:/Jefferson Sampling Date:5 Nov 12 I Applicant/Owner: Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T State: WA Sampling Point: Upland Plot 2 Investigator(s):W.David Loggy,Loggy Wetlands&Soil Consulting Section,Township,Range: SE1/,SO,T29N,RIE Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc):Low gradient outwash slope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Straight I Slope(%) 0-2 Subregion(LRR):A Lat:N 48.01595 I Long:W-122.67925 I Datum:WAS 84 I Soil Map Unit Name: Whidbey Series(See Soil Remarks on Page 2. NWI classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are vegetation ❑, Soil 0,or Hydrology ❑significantly disturbed? NO Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ' Are vegetation ❑, Soil ❑,or Hydrology ❑naturally problematic? No (I❑f needed,explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc I Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® Within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No El Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: IVEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Trees Stratum (10'r Plot size:) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That I 1.Pseudotsuga douglasii 50 Yes FACU Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)2 2. Total;Number of dominant Species Across All Strata: (B)4 I 3. Percent of Dominant Species q That Are OBL,FCW,or FAC: (A/B)50 50%=Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: ' Sapling/Shrub Stratum(15'R Plot size) Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 1.Gaultheria shallon 50 Yes FACU OBL species X l = I 2. Rubus spectabilis 20 Yes FAC FACW species X 2= 3. Symphoricarpos alba 5 No FACU FAC species X 3 = 4.Rosa nutkana 20 Yes FAC FACU species X 4= ' 5. Salix Scouleriana 5 No FAC UPL Species X 5 = 4. Column totals (A) (B) I S.. Prevalence index=B/A= 100 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Herb Stratum (Plot size:) ❑ 1.Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation I. ❑2.Dominance Test is>50% 2. I3 4 ❑3.Prevalence Index is<3.01 ❑4.Morphological Adaptations'(Provide 5. supporting data in Remarks or on a separate ' 6. sheet) 7. ❑5.Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 8. I 9. ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size) ' be present. 1. 2. Hydrophytic Vegetation ' =Total Cover Present? Yes El No%Bare Ground in Herb Stratton Remarks: The site plot was one of the sites for septic field site. The pit was within a shrub area on the edge of a forest area. ..n ♦___.1.--_ _rr"___"___""- lSr__�__._�r"'-`-'-' ,r_ii__.___a n___. ir_.._.__ n n ISOIL Sampling Point: Upland Plot 2 Profile Description: (Describe t o the depth needed to document the indicators or confirm the absence of indicators) II Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Textures Remarks 0 to 8 10YR 3/2 grls Weak fine granular/common fine,medium, course roots/20%gravel/cw bndy ' 8 to 20 10YR 4/4 vgsl Weak medium subangular blocky/to weak fine granular/few medium,coarse roots/35 % gravel/cw bndy I 20 to 25 10YR 414 vgrls Weak medium subangular blocky/to weak (dry) fine granular/few medium,coarse roots/35 %gravel/cw bndy I 25 to 30 2.5Y 5/4 vgrls Massive/slightly hard dry/few coarse roots/ (dry) weakly cemented/50%gravel,aw bndy. 30 to 44 10YR 5/1 80- 10YR 4/4 >2 C M s Massive/slightly hard moist/5%gravel/ 98 <20 few medium roots I 'Type:C Concentrations,D Depletion.RM=Reduced Matrix.CXS�overed or Coated Sand Grains. /Location: Pl=Pore lining, RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3' ❑Histosol(Al) ❑ Sandy Redox(SS) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) ' ❑Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2) ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(Fl)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks 3 ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al I) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ' ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3 lndicators of hydroph y ❑Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) tic vegetation and ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): IType: Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Depth(inches): El Remarks:This soil meets the range of the characteristics for the Whidbey Series. The soil at the site sampled is a moderately well drained. I HYDROLOGY I Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) ❑Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water Stained Leaves(B9)(MRLA 1,2, I ❑High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A and 4B) ❑Saturation(A3) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(810) El Water Marks(B1) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery ' ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) (C9) ❑Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils(C6) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D3) I ' ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl')(LRR A) ❑FAC=Neutral Test(D5) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑Other(Explain in remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface(B8) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) IField Observations Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): I Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): ' Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: IRemarks: ' US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 ' WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Regions Project/Site: Mauney/Rogerson Marrowstone Parcel 921094026 City/County:/Jefferson Sampling Date:26 Nov 12 I Applicant/Owner: Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T State: WA Sampling Point: Upland Plot 3 Investigator(s):W.David Loggy,Loggy Wetlands&Soil Consulting Section,Township,Range: SE1/4,S9,T29N,RIE Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc):Low gradient outwash slope or plain Local relief(concave,convex,none): Straight I Slope(%)0-2 Subregion(LRR):A I Lat:N 48.01479 I Long:W-122.67833 Datum:WGS 84 I Soil Map Unit Name: Jan Juan Series(See soil remarks on 2°d page,) I NWI classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are vegetation ❑, Soil 0,or Hydrology ❑significantly disturbed?No Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ I Are vegetation 0, Soil ❑,or Hydrology ❑naturally problematic? No (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area I Hydric Soil Present? Yes El No ® Within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No LEI Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No Remarks: I VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Trees Stratum (50'r Plot size: ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)3 I 1. 2. Total;Number of dominant Species Across All Strata: (B)3 3• I 4 Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL,FCW,or FAC: (A/B) 100 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: ISapling/Shrub Stratum(15' R Plot size) Total`)/0 Cover o£ Multiply by: 1. OBL species X 1 = 2. I 3. FACW species X 2= FAC species X 3= 4. FACU species X 4= - I 5. UPL Species X 5- 4. Column totals (A) (B) ' 5.. 50%=Total Cover Prevalence index=B/A= - Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ' Herb Stratum (5'r Plot size: ) ❑ 1.Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 1.Plantago Lanceolata 20 Yes FAC ❑2.Dominance Test is>50% 2.Holcus lanatus 10 No FAC 1 3.Festuca arundinacea 25 Yes FAC ❑3.Prevalence Index is<3.0' 4.Agrostis scabra 35 Yes FAC ❑4.Morphological Adaptations'(Provide 5. Lolium perenne 10 Yes FAC supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) I 6 7. ❑5. Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' I 8. ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' 9• (Explain) 100%=Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size:) be present. ' 1. 2. Hydrophytic Vegetation ' =Total Cover Present? Yes® No❑ Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: ' i tS Army Corns of Engineers Western Mountains.Valleys and Coast-Version 2.0 ' SOIL Sampling Point: Upland Plot 3 Profile Description: (Describe t o the depth needed to document the indicators or confirm the absence of indicators) ' Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Textures Remarks 0 to 6 10YR 2/1 sl Mod.fine granular/many very fine,fine roots/cw body I 6 to 17 7.5YR 2/1, Is Mod. medium subangular blocky parting to mod fine granular/common very fine,fine roots/aw bndy I 17 to 24 IOYR 2/1 50 Is 30% 10YR2/1 fire charcoal/weak to mod. 5YR 4/4 30 subangular block parting to mod. medium angular/few very fine,fine roots I 24 to 30 2.5Y 4/3& grvfs Single grain/few very fine roots/15%gravel 3/3 30 to 36 Multi color(2.5Y 4/3,3/2,3/3m grvfs Single grain/loose/30%small& medium 4/4) gravel I 'Type:C Concentrations,D=Depletion.RM=Reduced Matrix.CXS�overed or Coated Sand Grains. 2-Location: PI=Pore lining, RC=Root Channel,NI—Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3` ❑Histosol(Al) ❑Sandy Redox(SS) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) ' ❑Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2) ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(Fl)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks 3 ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ' ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3 Indicators of t ❑Sandy Mucky Mineral(SI) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) logy mu b vegetation and [Dandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): IType: Hydric Soil Present? But Yes ❑ No Depth(inches): Remarks:The soil at the site is not the Jan Juan or Whidbey Series as shown on Jefferson County Survey. It is sandy but lack the required gravel in the upper part of the soil to be either Series. It is an excessively drained soil because of the sandy textures. No series found for this I site. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators IPrimary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) ❑Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water Stained Leaves(B9)(MRLA 1,2, ❑High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A and 4B) I ❑Saturation(A3) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) (C9) I ❑Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron C4 ( ) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Recent lion Reduction in tilled Soils(C6) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl')(LRR A) ❑FAC=Neutral Test(D5) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑Other(Explain in remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ' ❑Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface(B8) ❑ Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) IField Observations Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): ' Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No (includes capillary fringe) IDescribe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: I Remarks:There was no standing water down to 36 inches and there was no evidence of saturated flow percolating through the36 inches of excavated soil from the recent intensive rain periods during the two week before. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 ' WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Regions Project/Site: Mauney/Rogerson Marrowstone Parcel 921094026 City/County:/Jefferson Sampling Date:26 Nov 12 I Applicant/Owner: Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T State: WA Sampling Point: Upland Plot 4 Investigator(s):W.David Loggy,Loggy Wetlands&Soil Consulting Section,Township,Range: SEI/4,S9,T29N,R1E Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc):Low gradient outwash lain or slope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Straight I Slope(%)0-2 Subregion(LRR):A I Lat:N 48.01519 I Long:W-122.67727 I Datum:WGS 84 I Soil Map Unit Name: Whidbey Series(See soil notes on 2"d page,) NWI classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are vegetation ❑, Soil ❑,or Hydrology ❑significantly disturbed?No Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ I Are vegetation ❑, Soil ❑,or Hydrology ❑naturally problematic? No (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area I Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® Within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No LE Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No El Remarks: ' VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Trees Stratum (50'r Plot size:) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)3 I 1. 2. Total;Number of dominant Species Across All Strata: (B)3 I 3. Percent of Dominant Species 4 That Are OBL,FCW,or FAC: (A/B)100 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: ' Sapling/Shrub Stratum(15' R Plot size) Total%Cover of: Multiply by: I.Rosa nutkana 2 No FAC OBL species X 1 = I 2. FACW species X 2= 3. FAC species X 3 = 4. FACU species X 4= I5. UPL Species X 5= 4. Column totals (A) (B) I 5.. Prevalence index=B/A= 2%=Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ❑ 1.Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ' Herb Stratum (5'r Plot size: ) 1.Plantago lanceolata 25 Yes FAC ❑2.Dominance Test is>50% 2.Agrostis scabra 30 Yes FAC 3. Festuca arundinacea 25 Yes FAC ❑3.Prevalence Index is<3.0' 4. Achillea millefolium 3 No FACU ❑4.Morphological Adaptations'(Provide 5.Lolium perenne 15 No FAC supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) I 6. ❑5.Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 8. ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' I9, (Explain) 100%=Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size:) be present. I 1. 2. Hydrophytic Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes® No❑ I Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: ' IJS Army Corns of Western Mountains.Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 I SOIL Sampling Point: Upland Plot 4 Profile Description: (Describe t o the depth needed to document the indicators or confirm the absence of indicators) 111 Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loci Textures Remarks 0 to 8 10YR 3/2 Ifs Weak medium subangular parting to mod. ' fine granular/many very fine,fine roots/cw bndy 8 to 15 7.5YR 3/3 Ifs Weak fine subangular blocky parting to weak &3/4 dry fine granular/common very fine,fine roots/ I cw body 15 to 26 7.5YR 3/3 s Weak fine subangular blocky parting to weak &4/4 dry fine granular/few very fine roots 26 to 36 Multi color(2.5Y 4/3,3/2,3/3, grs Single grain/few very fine roots/15% gravel Il 4/4) 'Type:C=Concentrations,D Depletion.RM=Reduced Matrix.CXS Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: Pl=Pore lining, RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3' ❑Histosol(Al) ❑Sandy Redox(SS) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) ❑Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2) I ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(Fl)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks 3 ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and I ID Sandy Mucky Mineral(SI) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) ['Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): I Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No El Depth(inches): Remarks:The soil at the site is not the Jan Juan or Whidbey Series as shown on Jefferson County Survey. It is sandy but lack the gravel in the soils to be the San Juan or Whidbey Series. It is an excessively drained soil because of the sandy textures. Meets range of characteristics I of the Indianola Series HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) I ❑Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water Stained Leaves(B9)(MRLA 1,2, ❑High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A and 4B) ❑Saturation(A3) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(Bl0) ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) 1 ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) (C9) ❑Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ID Geomorphic Position(D2) ' ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils(C6) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl')(LRR A) ❑FAC=Neutral Test(D5) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑Other(Explain in remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ' ❑Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface(B8) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Field Observations ISurface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): I Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No (includes capillary fringe) ' Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:There was no standing water down to 36 inches and there was no evidence of saturated flow percolating through the36 inches of Iexcavated soil from the recent intensive rain periods from the two week before. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Regions Project/Site: Mauney/Rogerson Marrowstone Parcel 921094026 City/County:/Jefferson Sampling Date: 11 Nov 12 I Applicant/Owner:Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T State: WA Sampling Point: Wetland Plot 1 Investigator(s):Kim Meehan/Meehan Roulst Consulting Section,Township,Range: SE1/4,S9,T29N,RIE Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc):Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none):Flat I Slope(%)0-2 Subregion(LRR):A I Lat:N 48.01449 I Long:W-122.67807 I Datum:WGS 84 I Soil Map Unit Name:San Juan Gravelly Sandy Loam(See soil remarks on Page 2) 1 NWI classification:PEMC&PEMA Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are vegetation ❑, Soil 0,or Hydrology ®significantly disturbed?No Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ I Are vegetation ❑, Soil ❑,or Hydrology ❑naturally problematic?No (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area I Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Within a Wetland? Yes 0 No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: I VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Trees Stratum (50'r Plot size:) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That ' 1 Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)3 2' Total;Number of dominant Species Across All Strata: (B)3 I 3.4 Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL,FCW,or FAC: (MB) 100 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: ISaplin2/Shrub Stratum(15'R Plot size) Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 1. OBL species X 1 = I 2.3. FACW species X 2= FAC species X 3 = 4. FACU species X 4= ' 5. UPL Species X 5= 4. Column totals (A) (B) I 5. Prevalence index=B/A= 50%=Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 Herb Stratum (5'r Plot size:) ❑ 1.Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 1.Plantago lanceolata 30 Yes FAC ®2.Dominance Test is>50% 2.Festuca arundinacea 40 Yes FAC 1 3.Ranunculus repens 10 No FACW ❑3.Prevalence Index is 53.0' 4.Agrostis gigantea 10 No FAC ❑4.Morphological Adaptations'(Provide 5.Holus lanatus 20 Yes FAC supporting data in Remarks or on a separate I6. sheet) ❑5.Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 8. I 9 ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 100%=Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size) be present. 11. 2. Hydrophytic Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes I %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum ® No❑ Remarks. ' ITS Army Corns of En°ineers Western Mountains.Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 ' SOIL Sampling Point: Wetland Plot l Profile Description: (Describe t o the depth needed to document the indicators or confirm the absence of indicators) ' Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loci Textures Remarks 0 to 10 10YR 2/2 sl Weak subangular blocky/few fine&many I medium roots/clear irregular budy 10 to 20+ 2.5Y 5/2 30 7.5YR 4/6 40 C M s Massive parting to single grain/30% IOYR 2/2 krotovina horizontal to and near the surface/ I I 'Type:Concentrations,D=Depletion.RM=Reduced Matrix.CXS Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: P1—Pore lining, RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3i ❑Histosol(Al) ❑Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) I ❑Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2) ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks 3 ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ®Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ' ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3 ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Indicators of hydrology must vegetation and ['Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. I Restrictive Layer(if present): Type:Lithologic discontinuity Depth(inches):10 Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks:The soil at this plot site is not the San Juan Series as it does not have any gravel throughout the 23 inches described. No soil series Icould be found for the soils in the wetland. They would be classified as Aquultic Haploxerolls HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators IPrimary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) ❑Surface Water(A1) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water Stained Leaves(B9)(MRLA 1,2, ' ❑High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A and 4B ❑ Saturation(A3) ❑Salt Crust(B11) 4B) ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Drainage Patterns(Tabl ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ®Dry-Season Saturation Visible on Aerial ial I ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) (C Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery ❑Algal Mat or Crust(134) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) (C9) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ( ) ®Geomorphic Position)D2) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils(C6) ❑ Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(136) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1')(LRR A) ❑FAC=Neutral Test(D5) ' ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑Other(Explain in remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface(B8) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Field Observations Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): ' Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):52 inches Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):52 inches Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ I (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: I Remarks:All horizons were moist to the top of the water table. Wetland Hydrology was check as being present because soon after the sample plots were described two storm periods delivered sufficient precipitation resulting in ponding to occur in the shallow depression in the slope and flat area and surface flow from the depression area of the wetland. ' US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 ' WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Regions Project/Site: Mauney/Rogerson Marrowstone Parcel 921094026 City/County:/Jefferson Sampling Date:9 Nov 12 I Applicant/Owner: Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T State: WA Sampling Point: Wetland Plot 2 Investigator(s):W.David Loggy,Loggy Wetlands&Soil Consulting Section,Township,Range:SE1/4,S9,T29N,R5E Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc):Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none):Flat I Slope(%) 0-2 Subregion(LRR):A I Lat:N 48.01461 I Long:W-122.67807 I Datum:WGS 84 I Soil Map Unit Name: Whidbey Series(See soil remarks on Page 2) NWI classification:PEMC&PEMA Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are vegetation 0, Soil ❑,or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? No Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ I Are vegetation 0, Soil El,or Hydrology ❑naturally problematic? No (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area I Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: I VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Trees Stratum (50'r Plot size:) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That 1. Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)4 I2. Total;Number of dominant Species Across All Strata: (B)4 I 3. Percent of Dominant Species (C)100 4 That Are OBL,FCW,or FAC: =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: ISapling/Shrub Stratum(15' R Plot size) Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 1.Rosa nutkana 10 No FAC OBL species X 1 = I 2. FACW species X 2= 3. FAC species X 3= 4. FACU species X 4= I5• UPL Species X 5 4. Column totals (A) (B) I 5•• Prevalence index=B/A= 10%=Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Herb Stratum (5'r Plot size:) ❑ 1.Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation I 1.Carex obnupta 30 Yes OBL ®2.Dominance Test is>50% 2.Juncus effusus 20 Yes FACW 3.Agrostis gigantea 30 Yes FAC ❑3.Prevalence index is<3.0' 4.Holus lanatus 20 Yes FAC ❑4.Morphological Adaptations)(Provide 5• supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ' 6 7. ❑5.Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 8. I ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' 9• (Explain) 100%=Total Cover 'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size:) be present. I21 Hydrophytic Vegetation =Total Cover ' Present? Yes® No❑ Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks:. ' IIS Army Corns of En°ineers Western Mountains.Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 ISOIL Sampling Point: Wetland Plot 2 Profile Description: (Describe t o the depth needed to document the indicators or confirm the absence of indicators) ' Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Textures Remarks 0 to 6 7.5YR 2.5/1 sl Weak fine granular/many,fine,medium and I few course roots/cw bndy 6 to 12 10YR 3/2 Is Weak fine subangular blocky/few fine, coarse roots/cw bndy 12 to 18 10YR 4/2 80 10YR 4/6 20 C M s Weak fine subangular blocky/few fine I coarse roots 18 to 58 10YR 4/1 80 10YR 4/6 20 C M s Massive parting to single grain I 'Type:Concentrations,l=Depletion.RM=Reduced Matrix.CXS Covered or Coated Sand Grains. aLocation: PI=Pore lining, RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3` ❑Histosol(Al) ❑ Sandy Redox(SS) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) I ❑Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2) ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(Fl)(except MLRA 1) 3 ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) p ) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks ®Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ' ®Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑Sandy Mucky Mineral(SI) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) disturbed or problematic. present unless Restrictive Layer(if present): I Type:Lithologic discontinuity Depth(inches):12 to 24 Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks:The dark surface and subsurface ranged from 12 to 22 inches thick in the trench. The soil at this plot site is not the San Juan Series Ias it does not have any gravel throughout the 23 inches described. No soil series could be found for the soils in the wetland. They would be classified as Aauultic Haploxerolls HYDROLOGY I Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) ❑ Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water Stained Leaves(B9)(MRLA 1,2, I ❑High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A and 4B) ❑ Saturation(A3) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(BIO) ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ®Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery I ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) (C9) ❑Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ®Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils(C6) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants 1' (LRR A ❑Shallow utral Test(D5 ' (D )( A) ®FAC Neutral Test(DS) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) 0 Other(Explain in remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface(B8) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) IField Observations Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): IWater Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):51 inches I Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):51 inches Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:All horizons were moist to the top of the standing water in the trench. Soil has vegetation on hummocks in this area that results in inundation during fall and winter recharge and into the early growing season. Wetland Hydrology was check as being present because soon after the sample plots were described two storm periods delivered sufficient precipitation resulting in ponding to occur in the shallow ' depression in the slope and flat area and surface flow from the depression area of the wetland. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 I ' WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Regions Project/Site: Mauney/Rogerson Marrowstone Parcel 921094026 City/County:/Jefferson Sampling Date: 11 Nov 12 IApplicant/Owner:Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T State: WA Sampling Point: Wetland Plot 3 Investigator(s):Kim Meehan/Meehan Roulst Consulting Section,Township,Range: SE1/4,S9,T29N,RIE Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc):Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none):Flat I Slope(%)0-2 Subregion(LRR):A I Lat:N 48.01399 I Long:W-122.67809 I Datum:WGS 84 I Soil Map Unit Name:San Juan Gravelly Sandy Loam(See soil remarks on Page 2) NWI classification:PEMC&PEMA Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes N No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are vegetation 0, Soil 0,or Hydrology ❑significantly disturbed?No Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ I Are vegetation ❑, Soil 0,or Hydrology ❑naturally problematic?No (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area IHydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: I VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Trees Stratum (50'r Plot size:) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That I Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)4 ' 2. Total;Number of dominant Species Across All Strata: (B)4 I 3. Percent of Dominant Species 4 That Are OBL,FCW,or FAC: (A/B) 100 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: ISapling/Shrub Stratum(15' R Plot size) Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 1. OBL species X 1 = 1111 2. FACW species X 2— 3. FAC species X 3= 4. FACU species X 4= ' 5. UPL Species X 5— 4. Column totals (A) (B) I 5. Prevalence index=B/A= =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ' Herb Stratum (5'r Plot size:) El 1.Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 1.Holus lanatus 20 Yes FAC ®2.Dominance Test is>50% 2.Festuca arundinacea 25 Yes FAC ' 3.Juncus effusus 20 Yes FACW ❑3.Prevalence Index is 53.0' 4.Ranunculus repens 10 No FACW ❑4.Morphological Adaptations'(Provide 5.Plantago lanceolata 15 Yes FAC supporting data in Remarks or on a separate I sheet) 6. Agrostis gigantea 10 No FAC 7. ❑5.Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 8. I ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' 9. (Explain) 100%=Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must I Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size:) be present. 1. 2. Hydrophytic Vegetation 1 =Total Cover Present? Yes® No❑ %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks. I I TS Army Corns of Engineers Western Mountains_Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 ISOIL Sampling Point: Wetland Plot 3 Profile Description: (Describe t o the depth needed to document the indicators or confirm the absence of indicators) ' Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Textures Remarks 0 to 9 10YR 2/1 sl Weak granular/many fine&common I medium roots/gradual irregular bndy 9 to 19 2.5Y 5/1 70 7.5YR 4/6 30 C M s Few fine roots/gradual irregular bndy 19+ 2.5Y 6/2 90 7.5YR 5/6 10 C M fs I 'Type:C—Concentrations,l: Depletion.RM=Reduced Matrix.CXS Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 'Location: P1=Pore lining, RGRoot Channel,M=Matrix I Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3` ❑Histosol(Al) ❑Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) ❑Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2) ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(Fl)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks 3 I ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ®Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3 ID Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ' ❑Sand Gle ed Matrix S4 wetland hydrology must be present,unless Y y ( ) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ I Depth(inches): Remarks:The soil at this plot site is not the San Juan Series as it does not have any gravel throughout the 23 inches described. No soil series could be found for the soils in the wetland. They would be classified as Aquultic Haploxerolls I HYDROLOGY IWetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) ' ❑Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water Stained Leaves(B9)(MRLA 1,2, ❑High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A and 4B) ❑Saturation(A3) ❑ Salt Crust(BlI) ❑Drainage Patterns(Bl0) ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ®Dry-Season Water Table(C2) I ❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) (C9) ❑Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ®Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils(C6) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl')(LRR A) ❑FAC=Neutral Test(D5) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑Other(Explain in remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface(B8) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) IField Observations ISurface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):53 inches ' Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):53 inches Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: IRemarks:All horizons were moist to the top of the water table. Wetland Hydrology was check as being present because soon after the sample plots were described two storm periods delivered sufficient precipitation resulting in ponding to occur in the shallow depression in the slope and flat area and surface flow from the depression area of the wetland. IUS Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 I WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Regions Project/Site: Mauney/Rogerson Marrowstone Parcel 921094026 City/County:/Jefferson Sampling Date:9 Nov 12 I Applicant/Owner: Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T State: WA Sampling Point: Wetland Plot 4 Investigator(s):W.David Loggy/Loggy Wetlands&Soil Consulting Section,Township,Range: SE1/4,S9,T29N,R1E Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc):Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none):Flat I Slope(%)0-2 Subregion(LRR):A I Lat:N 48.01366 I Long:W-122.67827 I Datum:WGS 84 I Soil Map Unit Name:San Juan Gravelly Sandy Loam(See soil remarks on Page 2) I N W I classification:PEMC&PEMA Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are vegetation D. Soil ❑,or Hydrology ®significantly disturbed?No Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ Are vegetation ❑, Soil 0,or Hydrology ❑naturally problematic?No (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) ISUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ❑ Is the Sampled Area I Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: I VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Trees Stratum (50'r Plot size: ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That 1. Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)4 2. Total;Number of dominant Species Across All Strata: (B)4 I 3. Percent of Dominant Species 4 That Are OBL,FCW,or FAC: (A/B)100 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: I Total%Cover of: Multiply by: Sanline/Shrub Stratum(15' R Plot size) 1. OBL species X 1 = I 2. FACW species X 2= 3. FAC species X 3 = 4. FACU species X 4= I5. UPL Species X 5= 4. Column totals (A) (B) I 5•• Prevalence index=B/A= 50%=Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Herb Stratum (5'r Plot size: ) ❑ 1.Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ' 1.Phalaris arundinacea 30 Yes FACW ®2.Dominance Test is>50% 2.Carex obnupta 30 Yes OBL ' 3.Juncus effusus 20 Yes FACW ❑3.Prevalence Index is 53.0' 4.Agrostis gigantea 20 Yes FAC ❑4.Morphological Adaptations'(Provide 5. supporting data in Remarks or on a separate 6 sheet) I 7. ❑5.Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' S. ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' I 9• (Explain) 100%=Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratum•(Plot size:) be present. 1 1. 2. Hydrophytic Vegetation —Total Cover ' Present? Yes® No❑ Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: The site plot was one of the site for septic field site. The pit was within a shrub area on the edge of a forest area. ' I IS Army Corns of Engineers Western Mountains.Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Wetland Plot 4 Profile Description: (Describe t o the depth needed to document the indicators or confirm the absence of indicators) Depth Matrix Redox Features ' (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc Textures Remarks 0 to 6 7.5YR 2.5/1 I Weak fine granular/many very fine,fine, I medium and few course roots/cw bndy 6 to 18 7.5YR 2.5/1 I moderate fine granular parting to single grain/common fine,medium course roots/ cw bndy ' 18 to 61 10YR 5/1 <80 10YR4/6 >20 C M s Massive parting to single grain I 'Type:Concentrations,D Depletion.RM=Reduced Matrix.CXScovered or Coated Sand Grains. 2-Location: P1=Pore lining, RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3` ❑Histosol(Al) ❑Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) I ❑Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2) ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(Fl)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks 3 ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ' ®Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) s ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Indicators of hydrology must t b vegetation and ['Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. I Restrictive Layer(if present): Type:Lithologic discontinuity Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):12 to 18 Remarks:The soil at this plot site is not the San Juan Series as it does not meet gravel requirement throughout the 61 inches described. No ' soil series could be found for the soils in the wetland. They would be classified as Aquultic Haploxerolls IHYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) I ❑Surface Water(Al) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water Stained Leaves(B9)(MRLA 1,2, ❑High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A and 4B) B 11 ' ❑Saturation(A3) ❑ Salt Crust(B11) 0 Drainage Patterns(BIO) ❑ Water Marks(B1) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ®Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery ❑ Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) (C9) I ❑Algal Mat or Crust(84) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ®Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Iron Deposits(85) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils(C6) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl')(LRR A) ®FAC=Neutral Test(D5) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑Other(Explain in remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface(B8) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) I Field Observations Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): IWater Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):55 inches Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):55 inches Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes r5 No ❑ (includes capillary fringe) ' Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:All horizons were moist to the top of the water table. Wetland Hydrology was check as being present because soon after the sample I plots were described two storm periods delivered sufficient precipitation resulting in ponding to occur in the shallow depression in the slope and flat area and surface flow from the depression area of the wetland. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 ' WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Regions Project/Site: Mauney/Rogerson Marrowstone Parcel 921094026 City/County:/Jefferson Sampling Date: 11 Nov 12 ' Applicant/Owner:Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T State: WA Sampling Point: Wetland Plot 5 Investigator(s):Kim Meehan/Meehan Roulst Consulting Section,Township,Range: SE1/4,S9,T29N,R1E Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc):Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none):Flat Slope(%)0-2 Subregion(LRR):A I Lat:N 48.01331 J Long:W-122.67863 Datum:WGS 84 ' Soil Map Unit Name:San Juan Gravelly Sandy Loam(See soil remarks on Page 2) NW[classification:PEMC&PEMA Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are vegetation 0, Soil ❑,or Hydrology ❑significantly disturbed?No Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ Are vegetation 0, Soil ❑,or Hydrology ❑naturally problematic?No (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area ' Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Within a Wetland? Yes El No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: ' VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Trees Stratum (50'r Plot size:) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)2 1 2. Total;Number of dominant Species Across All Strata: (B)2 3. Percent of Dominant Species 4 That Are OBL,FCW,or FAC: (A/B)100 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: ' Total%Cover o£ Multiply by: Sanlin¢/Shrub Stratum(15' R Plot size) 1. OBL species X 1 = 2. FACW species X 2= 3. FAC species X 3= 4. FACU species X 4= 5. UPL Species X 5= 4. Column totals (A) (B) 5.. Prevalence index=B/A= ' =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Herb Stratum (5' r Plot size:) ❑ 1.Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ' 1.Phalaris arundinacea 10 No FACW ®2.Dominance Test is>50% 2.Festuca arundinacea 20 Yes FAC ' 3.Juncus effusus 40 Yes FACW ❑3.Prevalence Index is_. 3.0' 4. Festuca pratense 10 No FACU ❑4.Morphological Adaptations'(Provide 5. Rosa Nutkana 10 No FAC supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ' 6.Holcus lanatus 10 No FAC 7. ❑5.Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 8. ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetations ' 9. (Explain) 100%=Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:) be present. ' I. 2. Hydrophytic Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes® No❑ ' %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks. ' US Army Corns ofF.nmincers Western Mountains.Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 ISOIL Sampling Point: Wetland Plot 5 Profile Description: (Describe t o the depth needed to document the indicators or confirm the absence of indicators) ' Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Typer Loc' Textures Remarks 0 to 11 10YR 2/1 I Medium angular blocky/many fine,medium roots/cw bndy I11 to 23 2.5Y 5/2 90 7.5YR 5/6 10 C M fs Few roots I 'Type:Concentrations,I;=Depletion.RM=Reduced Matrix.CXS Covered or Coated Sand Grains. tLocation: P1=Pore lining, RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix I Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) ❑Histosol(Al) ❑ Sandy Redox(S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3 ❑2 cm Muck(A10) ❑Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2) ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(FI)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks 3 I ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ®Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3 ❑Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ' ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type:Lithologic discontinuity Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ IDepth(inches): 11 Remarks:The soil at this plot site is not the San Juan Series as it does not have any gravel throughout the 23 inches described. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) I ❑Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water Stained Leaves(B9)(MRLA 1,2, ❑High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A and 4B) I ❑ Saturation(A3) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑Water Marks(B1) 0 Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ®Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) El Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) (C9) ❑Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ®Geomorphic Position(D2) ' ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils(C6) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(136) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(DI')(LRR A) i FAC=Neutral Test(D5) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) ❑Other(Explain in remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ' ❑Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface(B8) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) I Field Observations Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):64 inches Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):64 inches Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections), if available: Remarks:All horizons were moist to the top of the water table. Wetland Hydrology was check as being present because soon after the sample I plots were described two storm periods delivered sufficient precipitation resulting in ponding to occur in the shallow depression in the slope and flat area and surface flow from the depression area of the wetland. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 I IWETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Regions Project/Site:Mauney/Rogerson Marrowstone Parcel 921094026 City/County:/Jefferson Sampling Date:9 Nov 12 I Applicant/Owner:Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T State: WA Sampling Point:Wetland Plot 6 Investigator(s):W.David Loggy I Loggy Wetlands&Soil Consulting Section,Township,Range:SE1/4,S9,T29N,R1E Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc):Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none):Flat Slope(%)0-2 Subregion(LRR):A I Lat:N 48.01415 I Long:W-122.67850 I Datum:WGS 84 I Soil Map Unit Name:San Juan Series NWI classification:PEMC&PEMA Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are vegetation 0, Soil 0,or Hydrology O. significantly disturbed?No 11` Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ ' Are vegetation 0, Soil ❑,or Hydrology ❑naturally problematic?No (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showin g sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No [] Is the Sampled Area I Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No 12 Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: I VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Trees Stratum (50'r Plot size:) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)3 1 I 2. Total;Number of dominant Species Across All Strata: (B)3 I 3•4 Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL,FCW,or FAC: (A/B)100 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: I Total%Cover of: Multiply by: Sauline/Shrub Stratum(15'R Plot size) 1.Rosa nutkana 1 No FAC OBL species X 1 = I2. FACW species X 2= 3. FAC species X 3= 4. FACU species X 4= I5. UPL Species X 5= 4. Column totals (A) (B) I S•• =Total Cover Prevalence index=B/A= Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ' Herb Stratum (5'r Plot size:) ❑ 1.Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 1.Holus lanatus 25 Yes FAC ®2.Dominance Test is>50% 2. Festuca pratensc 10 No FACU 3.Juncus effusus 20 Yes FACW ❑3.Prevalence Index is<3.0' ' 4.Agrostis gigantea 25 Yes FAC ❑4.Morphological Adaptations'(Provide 5.Ranunculus repens 15 No FAC supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) I 6.Equisetum arvense 10 No FAC 7. ❑5.Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 8. ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' I 9. (Explain) 100%=Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size:) be present. ' 1. 2. Hydrophytic Vegetation ' =Total Cover Present? Yes® No❑ Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: ' ITS Army Corns of Engineers Western Mountains.Valleys and Coast—Version 2 A ISOIL Sampling Point: Wetland Plot 6 Profile Description: (Describe t o the depth needed to document the indicators or confirm the absence of indicators) ' Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc' Textures Remarks 0 to 10 7.5YR 2.5/1 1 Weak fine granular/many very fine,fine and few course roots/cw body ' 10 to 22 N2.5/1 I Moderate medium granular/common fine, medium roots/cw bndy 22 to 48 10YR 5/1 80 IOYR 4/6 20 C M vfs Massive parting to single grain/loose moist I 'Type:Concentrations,D=Depletion.RM=Reduced Matrix.CXS�overed or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PI=Pore lining, RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix IHydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soilsa` ❑Histosol(Al) ❑Sandy Redox(SS) ❑2 cm Muck(Al0) ❑Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2) I ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(Fl)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks 3 ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al I) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ®Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3 ' ❑Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Indicators of hydrology must vegetation and ['Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): I Type:Lithologic discontinuity Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):22 Remarks:The soil at this plot site is not the San Juan Series as it does not have any gravel throughout the 61 inches described. No soil series could be found for the soils in the wetland. They would be classified as Aquultic Haploxerolls IHYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators IPrimary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) ❑Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water Stained Leaves(B9)(MRLA 1,2, ' El High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A and 4B) ❑ Saturation(A3) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑ Water Marks(Bl) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(BI3) ®Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) (C9) I1 ' ❑Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ®Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Iron Deposits(135) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils(C6) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl')(LRR A) ❑FAC=Neutral Test(D5) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑Other(Explain in remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface(138) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Field Observations Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): ' Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):44 Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):44 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ I (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections), if available: I Remarks: Wetland Hydrology was check as being present because soon after the sample plots were described two storm periods delivered sufficient precipitation resulting in ponding to occur in the shallow depression in the slope and flat area and surface flow from the depression area of the wetland. ' US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 I 1 1 APPENDIX B ' WETLAND RATING SHEETS 1 1 Wetland name or number Mauney Wetland WETLAND RATING FORM-WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2-Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users ' Name of wetland(if known): Mauney Wetland Date of site visit:11-00 Nov 12 W.David Loggy I Loggy Soil& Rated by Wetland Consulting Trained by Ecology? Yes No Date of training18 Jun 08 SEC: 9 TWNSHP:29N_ RNGE: IE Is S/f/R in Appendix D? Yes No X Map of wetland unit: Figure Estimated size SUMMARY OF RATING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland ' I II III X IV_ Score for Water Quality Functions 14 t Category I=Score>=70 Category II=Score 51-69 Score for Hydrologic Functions 6 Category Ill=Score 30-50 Score for Habitat Functions 15 Category IV=Score<30 TOTAL score for Functions Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland I II_ Does not Apply X ' Final Category(choose the"highest"category from above) III Summary of basic information about the wetland unit Wetland Unit has Special Wetland HGM Class Characteristics Estuarine used for Rating Depr Depressional X Natural Heritage Wetland Riverine Bog Lake-fringe Mature Forest Slope Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal Lagoon Freshwater Tidal Interdunal ' None of the above Check if unit has multiple II HGM classes present Wetland Rating Form-western Washington 1 August 2004 ' version 2 t 1 1 ' Wetland name or number Mauney Wetland Does the wetland unit being rated meet any of the criteria below? If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland ' according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland. Check List for Wetlands That May Need Additional Protection YES NO ' (in addition to the protection recommended for its category) SPl.Has the wetland unit been documented as a habitat for any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered animal or plant species(T/E species)? For the purposes of this rating system."documented"means the wetland is on the X ' appropriate state or federal database. SP2.Has the wetland unit been documented as habitat for any Stale listed Threatened or Endangered animal species? For the purposes of this rating system,"documented"means the wetland is on the X appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are ' categorized as Category I Natural Heritage Wetlands see p. 19 of data form). SP3. Does the wetland unit contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WDFWfor the state? X SP4. Does the wetland unit have a local significance in addition to its functions? For example,the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master X Program,the Critical Areas Ordinance,or in a local management plan as having special significance. 1 ' To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the Hydro2eomorphic Class of the wetland being rated. The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This ' simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydogcomorphic Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below, See p.24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. • 1 1 1 Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington 2 August 2004 Version 2 1 11 1 1 I I I Wetland Classification of Vegetated Wetlands for Western Washington Name: Mauney Wetland Date: 19 Nov 12 1.Are the water levels in the wetland usually controlled by tides (i.e. except during floods)? ' NO-go to 2 YES--thu Actland clusa is Tidal T.;i.ge If yes,is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt(parts per ' thousand)? YES-Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO-Saltwater Tidal Fringe(Estuarine) If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wetland. Wetlands that were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt I Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions,and this separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions,the term"Estuarine"wetland is kept. I Please note,however,that the characteristics that define Category I and II estuarine wetlands have changed(see p. ). 2.1s the topography within the wetland flat and precipitation is only source(>90%)of water to it. NO-go to 3 YEE The wvaand class is Flats ' If your wetland can be classified as a"Flats"wetland,use the form for Depressions! wetlands. I 3. Does the wetland meet both of the following criteria? The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of open water(without any vegetation on the surface)where at least 20 acres(8 ha)are permanently inundated (ponded or flooded); I At least 30%of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft(2 m)? NO-goto4 -- - .. . ... •. . . 4.Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria? I X The wetland is on a slope(slope can be very gradual), The water flows through the wetland in one direction(unidirectional)and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface,as sheetflow,or in a swale without distinct I banks. X The water leaves the wetland without being impounded? NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks(depressions are usually I <3ft diameter and less than 1 foot deep). NO-go to 5 YES— ewe d-class-is-Slope 5.Is the wetland in a valley,or stream channel,where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from I that stream or river? The flooding should occur at least once every two years,on the average,to answer"yes." The wetland can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding. NO-go to 6 YE S The v c -., _l___ i_ I Wetland Ratio Form-western Washington 3 August 2004 I I I I ' Mauney Wetland 6.Is the wetland in a topographic depression in which water ponds,or is saturated to the surface,at I some time of the year. This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO—goto7 — I 7. Is the wetland located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no stream or river running through it and providing water. The wetland seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched,but has no obvious natural outlet. INO—goto8 8.Your wetland seems to be difficult to classify. For example,seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain,or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of I flooding along its sides. Sometimes we find characteristics of several different hydrogeomorphic classes within one wetland boundary. Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: I Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10%or more of the total area of the wetland being rated. If the area of the second class is less than 10%classify the wetland using the first class. I HGM Classes Within a Delineated Wetland Boundary Class to Use in Rating Slope+Riverine Riverine Slope+Depressional Depressional I Slope+Lake-fringe Lake-fringe Depressional+Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional Depressional+Lake-fringe Depressional Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater Treat as ESTUARINE under ' wetland wetlands with special characteristics I If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland,or you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary,classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. I Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 4 August 2004 I I I Wetland name or number Mauney Wetland D Depressional and Flats Wetlands Points ' WATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS - Indicators that the wetland unit functions to t°"ty t 3Core improve water quality Per box) D D I.Does the wetland unit have the potential to improve water quality? (see p.38) ' D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: Figure Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it(no outlet) points=3 D Unit has an intermittently flowing,OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points=2 Unit has an unconstrieted,or slightly consuiet d,surface outlet (permanently flowing)points=I Unit is a"Oat"depression(Q.7 on key),or in the Flats class,with permanent surface outflow and ' no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch points=I (ifditch is not permanently flowing treat unit as"intermiuentlyfenving") 2 Provide photo or drawing S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface(or dull'layer)is clay or organic (use NRCS definitions) ' D YES points=4 0 NO points=0 D 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation(emergent.shrub,and(or forest Cowardin class) Figure_ Wetland has persistent,ungrazed,vegetation>=95%of area points=5 D Wetland has persistent,ungrazed,vegetation>=1/2 of area points=3 ' Wetland has persistent,ungrazed vegetation>=1/10 of area points Wetland has persistent,ungrazed vegetation<I/10 of area points=0 3 Map of Cowardin vegetation classes DI.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation. Figure_ , ' D This is the area of the wetland unit that is ponded for at least 2 months,but dries out sometime during the year. Do not count the area that is permanently ponded Estimate area as the average condition 5 out of 10 yrs. Area seasonally ponded is>'Ft total area of wetland points=4 Area seasonally ponded is>'/ total area of wetland points=2 Area seasonally ponded is<V. total area of wetland points=0 2 1 Map of Hydrous= ds D Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above I 7 D D 2.Does the wetland unit have the ooportunity to improve water quality? (see p.44) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reducg water quality in streams,lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland.Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants coming from several i ' sources,but any single source would qual as opportunity. — Grazing in the wetland or within 150 R — Untreated storm water discharges to wetland X Tilled fields or orchards within I50 ft of wetland — A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas,residential areas, t farmed fields,roads,or clear-cut logging — Residential,urban areas,golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland — Wetland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen multiplier — Other 2 YES multiplier is2 NO multiplier is 1 ' ' D TOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from DI by D2 14 I Add score to table on p. 7 Wetland Rating Form–Western Washington 5 August 2004 ' Version 2 I I I I I ' Wetland name or number Manny Wetland D Depressional and Flats Wetlands Points HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS - Indicators that the wetland unit functions to (only I scort Ireduce flooding and stream degradation mho.)3.Does the wetland unit have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? (see p.46) D D 3.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland unit Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it(no outlet) points=4 ' Unit has an intermittently flowing,OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points=2 Unit is a"flat"depression(Q.7 on key),or in the Flats class,with permanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch points=I (if ditch is not permanently flowing treat unit as"intermittently flowing') 2 ' Unit has an unconstricted,or slightly constricted,surface outlet (permanently flowing) points=0 D D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods • Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet.For units with no outlet measure from the surface of permanent water or deepest part(if dry). Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points=7 ' The wetland is a"headwater"wetland" points=5 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points=5 Marks arc at(cast 0.5 ft to<2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points=3 Unit is flat(yes to Q.2 or Q.7 on key)but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points=I I Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft points=0 D D 3.3 Contribution of wetland unit to storage in the watershed Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. , I The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of unit points=5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points=3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points=0 $ Entire unit is in the FLATS class points=5 ___—_ D Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above I 6 I ' D D 4.Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? (see p.49) Answer YES if the unit is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage,or reduction in water velocity,it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Answer NO if the water I coming into the wetland is controlled by a structure such as flood gate,tide gate,flap valve,reservoir etc.OR you estimate that more than,90%of the water in the wetland is from groundwater in areas where damaging groundwater flooding does not occur. Note which of the following indicators of opportunity apply. I — Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems — Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems — Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might otherwise flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems multiplier — Other 1 YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 D TOTAL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4 Add score to table on p. 1 6 I Wetland Rating Form-Western Washington 6 August 2004 IVersion 2 I I I Wetland name or number Mauney Wetland These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. Points ' (only bO')score HABITAT FUNCTIONS-Indicators that unit functions to provide important habitat P°�"t H 1.Does the wetland unit have the potential to provide habitat for many species? H 1.1 Veaelalion structure(seep. 72) Figure_ ' Check the types of vegetation classes present(as defined by Cowardin)-Size threshold for each class is t acre or more than 10%of the area if unit is smaller than 2.5 acres. _Aquatic bed X Emergent plants ' Scrub/shrub(areas where shrubs have>30%cover) Forested(areas where trees have>30%cover) 1f the unit has a forested class check if The forested class has 3 out of 5 strata(canopy,sub-canopy,shrubs,herbaceous, moss/ground-cover)that each cover 20%within the forested polygon ' Add the number of vegetation structures that qualify. If you have: 4 structures or more points-=4 Map of Cowardin vegetation classes 3 structures points=2 2 structures points=1 0 I structure points=0 ' H 1.2.Hvdroneriods(seep. 73) Figure Check the types of water regimes(hydroperiods)present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10%of the wetland or%acre to count.(see text for descriptions ofhydroperiods) ' Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present points=3 X Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present points=2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present point=1 X Saturated only I type present points=0 Permanently flowing stream or river in,or adjacent to.the wetland ' X Seasonally flowing stream in,or adjacent to,the wetland Lake-fringe wetland=2 points Freshwater tidal wetland=2 points Map of hydroperiods 2 H 1.3.Richness of Plant Specie*(seep.75) • ' Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 f 2. (different patches ojtbe same species can be combined to meet the size threshold) You do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Milfoil,reed canarygrass,purple loosestrife, Canadian Thistle If you counted: >19 species points=2 ' List species below ttfyou want to: 5-19 species points= <5 species points=0 1 Total for page 3 Wetland Rating Form-Western Washington 13 August 2004 ' Version 2 1 Wetland name or number Mauney Wetland 1 H 1.4,Interspersion of habitats(seep. 76) Figure_ ' Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation classes(described in H 1.1),or the classes and unvegetated areas(can include open water or mudflats)is high,medium,low,or none. 1 0 0 None=0 points Low=I point Moderate=2 points 1011"14 in riparian braided channels] High =3points Nan-::If you have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water u the rating is always"high". Use map of Cowardin vegetation classes H 13.Special Habitat Features:(seep. 77) Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland The number of checks is the ' number of points you put into the next column. Large,downed,woody debris within the wetland(>4in.diameter and 6 ft long). _Standing snags(diameter at the bottom>4 inches)in the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft(2m)and/or overhanging vegetation extends at ' least 3.3 ft(I m)over a stream(or ditch)in,or contiguous with the unit,for at least 33 ft (I Om) _Stable steep banks of tine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30degree slope)OR signs of recent beaver activity are present(cut shrubs or trees that have not yet turned grey/brown) ' X At least'4 acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches arc present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated.(structurea for egg-laying by amphibians) X Invasive plants cover less than 25%of the wetland area imeach stratum of plants NOTE:The 20%stated in early printings of the manual on page 78 is an error. 2 H 1.TOTAL Score- potential for providing habitat 1 5 I Add the scores from 111.1,H1.2,111.3,111.4,H1.5 Comments Wetland hating Form-Western Washington 14 August 2004 ' Version 2 I I Wetland name or number Maud Wetland II 2.Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species? ' 11 2.1 Butlers (seep.80) Figure_ Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland unit.The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating.See text for definition of "undisturbed" I - 100 m(33011)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water >95% of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no-grazing,no landscaping,no daily human use) Points=5 — 100 in(330 ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water > 50% circumference. Points=4 I - 50 m(17011)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water>95% circumference. Points=4 — 100 m(33011)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water>25% circumference,. Points=3 - 50 m(17011)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water for> 50%circumference. Points=3 If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above — No paved areas(except paved trails)or buildings within 25 m(8011)of wetland>95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing,or lawns are OK. Points=2 I - No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for>50%circumference. Light to moderate grazing,or lawns are OK. Points=2 — Heavy grazing in buffer. Points=I — Vegetated buffers are<2m wide(6.6ft)for more than 95%of the circumference(e.g.tilled ' I fields,paving,basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points=0. — Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points=I 5 Aerial photo showing buffers H 2.2 Corridors and Connections(seep.81) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor ' (either riparian or upland)that is at least 150 ft wide,has at least 30%cover of shrubs,forest or native undisturbed prairie,that connects to estuaries,other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors,heavily used gravel roads,paved roads,are considered breaks in the corridor). I YES=4 points (go to 12.3) NO=go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland)that is at least 5011 wide,has at least 30%cover of shrubs or forest,and connects to estuaries,other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake-fringe wetland,if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in I the question above? YES=2 points (go toH2.3) N0=H2.2.3 11 2.2.3 Is the wetland: within 5 mi(8km)of a brackish or salt water estuary OR within 3 mi of large field or pasture(>40 acres)OR ' within 1 mi ofa lake greater than 20 acres? YES--I point NO=0 points t Total for page 6 I Wetland Rating Form–Western Washington IS August 2004 IVersion 2 I I I Wetland name or number Mauney Wetland H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW (see new and complete ' descriptions of WDFW priority habitats,and the counties in which they can be found,in the PHS report htip://wdfw.wa.uov/hab/phslist.htm) Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft(100m)of the wetland unit?NOTE:the connections do not have to be relatively undisturbed. ' =Aspen Stands:Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.4 ha(I acre). _Biodiversity Areas and Corridors:Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 152). Herbaceous Balds:Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. ' _Old-growth/Mature forests:(Old growth west of Cascade crest)Stands of at least 2 tree species,forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings;with at least 20 trees/ha(8 trees/acre)>81 cm(32 in)dbh or>200 years of age. (Mature forests) Stands ' with average diameters exceeding 53 cm(21 in)dbh;crown cover may be less that 100%; crown cover may be less that 100%;decay,decadence,numbers of snags,and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth;80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. ' Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158). Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of ' both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. Westside Prairies: Herbaceous,non-forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161). �lnstream:The combination of physical,biological,and chemical processes and conditions ' that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. X Nearshore:Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore,and Puget Sound Nearshore.(full descriptions of habitats and the ' definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report:pp. 167-169 and glossary in Appendix A). Caves:A naturally occurring cavity,recess,void,or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils,rock,ice,or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a ' human. _Cliffs:Greater than 7.6 m(25 ft)high and occurring below 5000 ft. _Talus:Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15-2.0 m(0.5-6.5 ft), 111 composed of basalt,andesite,and/or sedimentary rock,including riprap slides and mine tailings.May be associated with cliffs. Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife.Priority snags have a ' diameter at breast height of>51 cm(20 in)in western Washington and are>2 m(6.5 ft)in height. Priority logs are>30 cm(12 in)in diameter at the largest end,and>6 m(20 ft) long. If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats=4 points ' If wetland has 2 priority habitats=3 points If wetland has 1 priority habitat=1 point No habitats=0 points Note:All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list. Nearby wetlands are addressed in question H 2.4) 1 Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 16 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 ' Wetland name or number IMauney/Wetland H 2.4 Wetland Landscape(choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland that best fits)(seep.84) ' There are at least 3 other wetlands within'/x mile,and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed(light grazing between wetlands OK,as is lake shore with some boating,but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads,fill,fields,or other development. points=5 t The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetlands within Yx mile points=5 There are at least 3 other wetlands within'A mile,BUT the connections between them are disturbed points=3 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe ' wetland within Yx mile points=3 There is at least 1 wetland within'A mile. points=2 There are no wetlands within'A mile. points=0 3 H 2.TOTAL Score- opportunity for providing habitat r— I Add the scores from 112.1.112.2,H2.3,H2.4 _ 10 _ I TOTAL for H l from page 14 5 Total Score for Habitat Functions -add the points for H I,H 2 and record the result on 15 P. 1 Wetland Rating Form-Western Washington 17 August 2004 Version 2 t I I Wetland name or number Mauney Wetland ' CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS I Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described below and circle the appropriate answers and Category. 1 Wetland Type Category Check off any criteria that apply to the wetland Circle the Category when the appropriate criteria are met. SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands(seep.86) I Does the wetland unit meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? — The dominant water regime is tidal, — Vegetated,and — With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. 1 YES= Go to SC 1.1 NO X SC 1.1 Is the wetland unit within a National Wildlife Refuge,National Park, National Estuary Reserve,Natural Area Preserve,State Park or Educational, Cat.I Environmental,or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? 1 YES=Category I NO go to SC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland unit at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? YES=Category 1 NO=Category It Cat.I • 1 -The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking,ditching,filling, Cat.II cultivation,grazing,and has less than 10%cover of non-native plant species. If the non-native Spartina spp.are the only species that cover more than 10%of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual Dual rating(11l1). The area of Spartina would be rated a Category II while the rating I relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a I/II Category 1. Do not,however,exclude the area of Spartina in determining the size threshold of 1 acre. —At least'A of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of I shrub,forest,or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. —The wetland has at least 2 of the following features:tidal channels, depressions with open water,or contiguous freshwater wetlands. I I I Wetland Rating Form Western Washington 18 August 2004 I Version 2 1 111 1 1 Wetland name or number—Mauney Wetland 1 SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands (see p.87) ' Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Cat.I Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened,Endangered,or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland unit being rated in a Section/Township/Range that contains a t Natural Heritage wetland? (this question is used to screen out most sites before you need to contact WNHP/DNR) SLUR information from Appendix I) or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site YES —contact WNHP/DNR(see p.79)and go to SC 2.2 NO X SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? YES=Category I NO not a Heritage Wetland ' SC 3.0 Bogs (see p.87) Does the wetland unit(or any part of the unit)meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs?Use the key below to identf if the wetland is a bog. If you ' answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. 1. Does the unit have organic soil horizons(i.e.layers of organic soil),either pests or mucks,that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the soil profile?(See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils)?W-es-• ' iv,NQ.3 No -go to Q.2 2. Does the unit have organic soils,either peals or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock,or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash,or that are floating on a lake or pond? Yc-a g,n,Q.3 No-Is not a bog for purpose of rating 3. Does the unit have more than 70%cover of mosses at ground level,AND other plants,if present,consist of the"bog"species listed in Table 3 as a ' significant component of the vegetation(more than 30%of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)? Yes—Is a bog for purpose of rating No- go to Q.4 • NOTE:If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory ' you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pli of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16"deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the "bog"plant species in Table 3 are present,the wetland is a bog. 3. Is the unit forested(>30%cover)with sitka spruce,subalpine fir,western ' red cedar,western hemlock,lodgepole pine,quaking aspen,Englemann's spruce,or western white pine,WITH any of the species(or combination of species)on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover(>30%coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover)? 4. YES= Category I No Is not a bog for purpose of rating Cat.I Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington I9 August 2004 ' Version 2 1 I I Wetland name or number Mauney Wetland I SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands(seep. 90) I Does the wetland unit have at least 1 acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? lfyou answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. — Old-growth forests:(west of Cascade crest)Stands of at least two tree species, I forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings;with at least 8 trees/acre(20 trees/hectare)that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height(dbh)of 32 inches(81 cm)or more. NOTE:The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests. I Two-hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DEW criterion is and"OR" so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. I - Mature forests:(west of the Cascade Crest)Stands where the largest trees are 80-200 years old OR have average diameters(dbh)exceeding 21 inches (53cm);crown cover may be less that 100%;decay,decadence,numbers of snags,and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth. ' YES= Category I NO X not a forested wetland with special characteristics Cat. SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons(seep.91) , Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? I — The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks,gravel banks, shingle,or,less frequently,rocks ' —The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish(>0.5 ppt)during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon(needs to be measured near the bottom) YES=Go to SC 5.1 NO X not a wetland in a coastal lagoon I ' SC 5.1 Does the wetland meets all of the following three conditions? —The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking,ditching,filling, cultivation,grazing),and has less than 20%cover of invasive plant species(see list of invasive species on p.74). I -At least'/,of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub,forest,or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. Cat.I —The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre(4350 square feet) YES=Category I NO=Category I I Cat.I ' I Wetland Rating Form-Western Washington 20 August 2004 ' Version 2 I I I I Wetland name or number Mauney Wetland SC 6.0 Interdunal Wetlands (see p. 93) Is the wetland unit west of the 1889 line(also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? YES-go to SC 6.1 NO X not an interdunal wetland for rating If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its ' junctions In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: • Long Beach Peninsula-lands west of SR 103 • Grayland-Westport-lands west of SR 105 • Ocean Shores-Copalis-lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 ' SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger,or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is once acre or larger? YES=Category II NO—go to SC 6.2 Cat.11 ' SC 6.2 Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 acre,or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and 1 acre? YES=Category III Cat. III Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics ' Choose the "highest"rating if wetland into several categories.and record on P. 7. If you answered NO for all types enter"Not Applicable"on p.1 1 Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington 21 August 2004 ' Version 2 1 APPENDIX C DRAWINGS AND MAPS I'11 1 1 I MLAj12-68 SNORT PRELIMFOR MA UN. irY/R0G�'RSON TRUST IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., 4 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON I 9 �,M IFI p QUARTER CORNER 'D g FOUND 4"x 4'CONCRETE MON IN ALUMINUM CASE g h (4/00/04) I 1 _ MOEN ROAD —_ -- S'c CENTER OF SECTION 9 TE FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT IN NORTH LINE OF 'gN Lu ALUMINUM CASE. (1/23/09) THE SE 1/4 a ti ' I. FOUND 1 1/2'BRASS CAP WIN PUNCH I 9Z g 4 IN MONUMENT WELL. (1/23/09) I MONUMENT LIES SO9'3 9Y,1'I1 2.79' FROM TRUE 1/16TH CORNER 1 ' W WOE OF GRAM 750 75 0 58T5114E 16 /72. S(,KE IN FEET P'rt.:-cC-._i e�c'��vc■c"" '' 1302.J2' 419.30' t•A:l sry�_/ _� _s�L�_�l�_��_i%�p // // t A//�7�/� 663.02' DISNEY ROAD O 15' ;kW'1 N DRAINAGE DITCH'4 AREA: Qp o APPROX. AREA LOT 1: 41.159 SF(0.94 ACRE) 0 0.12 ACRES. NORTH o LOT 2: 92.996 SF(2.14 ACRE) r OF WETLAND AND 2 '� I 'et,. SOUTH OF REND. ..Ni LOT 3: 16,162 SF(0.37 ACRE) ' M, GOVT LOT Yr� 937,507 sq. R. op 1 'E TOTAL WETLAND AREA=3.45 ACRES FEACE Bi➢'E c` Si 709 �' 10.04 acres `(p'. "�, �" \ A.cv • H2O - SHALLOW WATER SUpv� 6 MEASURING SITE PM 921�4p2 • ~ S - WETLAND SAMPLE PLOT h d TIES 2/20/GRILL A car z 3 ORANAGE DITCH }. m N. '' �MoIAO sq. R. h • UP - UPLAND SAMPLE POINT 485,853 I I N • _wry, 11.15 acres H 15 \I NORTH ,L ,2 CALCULATED POSITION OF A REB4R ' .. ® (` �_� '. WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED: --- t` 'A. WOOD PLS 23911"PER VOL. /�'. \ ENSONG ME. @ .� 7350' 31 OF SURVEYS. PAGE :09. BIM9xM SEPV.T-Ef �. �. I/ : i11' .` i LINE TABLE S8T53'32EI\ 7• � 'O•' 1!,.,} =i `I LINE BEARING LENGTH • 19.170' ` \ / LOT 1 y.�1 � 7 /`1ti L73 U N53'02.421- 79.47' t �` 581,569 sq. R. = = I 1 L2 N48"39:39"E 69.07' ' E99E OF A9Ai4T n 1335 ones \ =i= 7DP OF /LV 1.3 ROAD 4MLT h \ ,i`s SLOPE p NSJ'78'37 E 96.11' TES 2/20/@ \ / 41,i . v5 -l 61 LINE OF U •.O'30JI E 66. 6' / Q.B \ 1 DRANAGE VEGETATION 1.5 N50'30'31 96.05' ® i 11E7L I aTCH / �9 L6 N5455502' 62.53' L7 N51'40J0T 93.82' �BNII1)ING �\ 4�/ / V8 NDT LB ' ' N4 r �p�`S\9R_'',�'( L9 N51'10'25 E 137.84' n ■ ' /J '�° L10 N5 T16JIE 52.97'a lb 5�AI�p iLLp L� �N�� 1.12 N48'48'52E 74.63' EWER F4¢ N p[" 1� L13 N51'40'461' 29.57' I A." r PDT LEGEND; CHARTER CORNfR 91 �+ S • DENOTES FOUND 5/8'RENAR WBH PLASTIC SURVEY CAP STAMPED: CALCULATED POSITION iL WOOD 23971' (1/23/09) PER VOL. 7 OF SURVEYS 9 PAGE 101. /�}`' LINE OF A DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND AND ACCEPTED AS NOTED. (7/23/09) 547.57' �V VEGETATION 16 58751 D5'E 6 DENOTES TEST PIT LOCATION PER JSF ENGINEERING(4/24/12) / / 1:.::;,S,61, DENOTES EXISTNG GRAVEL DRNEWAY PER FIELD DES 1/27/09. ® DENOTES 20'WIDE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY PER DEED RECORDED UNDER ARV 459620. ACO SCALE // 1' 1"�_'� DENOTES WETLAND PER FIELD TIES II/IB/11. ' AL. s 1 NOTESNOTES;� �Y I.THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED BY FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS USING A 5 SECOND 7OPCOV G15-135W TOTAL STATION AND STEEL TAPE. ' 2.FOR BASIS OF DEARING AND SECTION JEFFERSON DATA, SEE VOL. 7 OF SEE UN PAGE )01. RECORDS OF LAY COUNTY, WASHINGTON.ON TI ALSO SEE UNRECORDED 1 SURVEY BY J.T. UY EATED MARCH 1948 ON FILE WITH THE VS' is �� JEFFERSON TLNREPORT COUNTY AND NfBY L Y J.WETLAND REPORT AND OEZN/EA7iON BY SOGGY SOIL AND WETLAND CONSULTING y(7�-',CPU~ (, A' 4. RESERVE AREA FOR DRANF7ELD SHOWN HEREON BY JSF ENGINEERING INC. O" 1 TITLED 'WASTEWATER SYSTEM PUN'AND LISTED 71/26/72. ' ; I E _ ��� '� NOVEMBER 29, 2012 SHEET 1 OF 7 t a' btu ��� N.T.S. q 1 4C79E�, / y 7 P.O.lox 2199 'T A I.AT� r"I I 935 1 010 Ave. ' � CT M P SI1RVEtlNG � 11 (300vA 992/2 ,`[ MAPPING 1 1 pgu7 Seguin,WA 9 SUBJECT Q� xl DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING , r (3x aa9-v1° JRAMN er: HB •� CgVSTRUCOQ/MANAGEMENT 1 (000)6BI-2161 SERE 01E2909-MAUNET_SP_BASE-022012 Perry 9(29N-IE) 1 �r _. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ALi4 Li/ ( kf &&4) I • Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting W. David Loggy,CPSS and Wetland Specialist I P.O. Box 2347, Port Angeles,WA 98362 \kfECE3VEn Phone:360 457 3920—Fax:360-457-0131 !(:'h S j Email:wdploggy@olypen.com -1,, ,. IWeb Page:Olypen.com/wdploggy DEC V Specializing in: 1 ' Soil Mapping and Classification jEFfER$ONCOUNU < rmr>r<:r:.,,,..-.1.1110 i Soil Investigations— Soil Site Analysis Skill "Si WI ii DEP1.OF COMMUNITf DEVELOPM Wetland Mapping,Delineation and Restoration Soil Redox Potential Monitoring for Hydric Soil Determination I ' WETLAND CRITICAL AREA STUDY RESULTS CONDUCTED ON PROPERTY ILocated in a portion of Section 9 T.29N,R.1E,W.M., , Jefferson County,Washington Parcel Numbers: 921094026 Title Owner: Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T 2133 Oak Bay Road ' Port Hadlock,WA 98339-9778 Study Requested By: Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T ' 2133 Oak Bay Road Port Hadlock,WA 98339-9778 I ' Proposed Land Action: Short Plat Study Name: Mauney/Rogerson 921094026 ' Regulatory Agency Jefferson County Department of Community Development IReference For Study: Jefferson County Code 18.22 Article VII I Study Conducted By: Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting W. David Loggy, CPSS P.O. Box 2347 I Port Angeles, WA 98362-0303 (360)457-3920 ' November 2012 I TABLE OF CONTENTS I Page I CONSULTING COMPANY 1 TYPE OF CRITICAL AREA INVESTIGATION 1 LAND OWNER 1 APPLICANT I I PROPOSED PROJECT 1 PARCEL NUMBER 1 SITE LOCATION 1 ' A.METHODS AND APPROACH 2 B.NON-WETLAND AREA I 1.EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS 2-4 i.Landscape Position 2 ii.Slope gradient 2 I iii.Geologic Materials 2 iv.Water Types present 2 v.Non-wetland Plots 1,2,3&4 2 vi.Vegetation Cover 3 I vii.Soils 3-4 viii.Water source For Soil Hydrology 4 C.WETLAND AREA ' 1.EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS 4-7 i.Landscape Position 4 ii.Slope gradient 4 I iii.Geologic Materials 4 iv.Water Types present 4 v.Wetland Plots 1,2,3&4 4 vi.Vegetation Cover 5 I vii. Soils 5-7 viii.Water source For Soil Hydrology 4 ' D.CRITICAL AREA DETERMINATION,CLASSIFICATION&DELINEATION 8-10 TABLES I TABLE ONE—DOMINATE VEGETATION ON UPLAND PLOT SITES 3 TABLE TWO—DOMINATE VEGETATION ON WETLAND PLOT SITES 5 I TABLE THREE—WETLAND CATEGORY RATING SCORES 8 TABLE FOUR—SPECIAL WETLAND IDENTIFIED TYPES 8 TABLE FIVE—WETLAND HGM CLASS RATINGS&WETLAND CATEGORY 9 ' APPENDICES APPENDIX A—FIELD DATA SHEETS IAPPENDIX B—WETLAND RATING SHEETS APPENDIX C—DRAWINGS AND MAPS I 1 1 1 PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1 1 1 1 I ' WETLAND CRITICAL AREA STUDY RESULTS ICONSULTING COMPANY: Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting TYPE OF CRITICAL AREA INVESTIGATION: Wetlands ILAND OWNER OR PURCHASER: Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T 2133 Oak Bay Road IPort Hadlock, WA 98339-9778 APPLICANT: Mauney/Rogerson REV LW T I 2133 Oak Bay Road Port Hadlock, WA 98339-9778 PROPOSED PROJECT: Short Plat I TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S): 921094026 ' SITE LOCATION: LEGAL LOCATION: ISTREET ADDRESS: 91 Baldwin Road Nordland,WA 98339-9778 IROAD ROUTE INSTRUCTIONS: I Starting from Port Townsend travel south on SR 20 to South SR 19. Then take South SR 19 to East SR 116 past Indian Island to Marrowstone Island. At the intersection of East SR 116 and Robbins Road take Robbins Road south and then east to the intersection of Baldwin Road,East Marrowstone Road and Disney Road. At the intersection take Baldwin Road to 91 Baldwin Road I or continue east on Disney Road to the large pasture on the south side of Disney Road(Figure 1 and 2 below). r 45016k x — \I i ' 1 DM ■ �Cr I p r. i \ 4 \'‘ik M* 1 tn: t ,i mx 4r.r 41 ,r y ` , Y + it 1 Jelfrr.un- I % _. N,Scaled wiremiNSI ft ' Figure 1 —Site location of the project. Figure 2—Property Project Area IMauney/Rogerson 1 LSWC November 2012 A. METHODS,APPROACH AND REGULATORY OVERSIGHT ' Two levels of information were gathered to do a routine wetland determination. These included: a)Review of preliminary site data and, b) On-site investigation to determine the presence of wetlands and non-wetland waters. ' A review of existing information was conducted to develop background knowledge of physical features,and to identify the potential for wetland and other water occurrences on the subject ' property. The resource documents available for preliminary review of the site conditions included: USDA Soil Conservation Service(SCS), "Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area Washington",(1194-2011)aerial photography of Jefferson County,Jefferson County Planning Department critical area data base information and U.S Fish and Wildlife NWI maps. During the on-site investigation,the wetland was identified and delineated on the basis of three parameters:Hydrophytic Vegetation,Hydric Soils,and Wetland Hydrology,as recommended using the Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation 1987 Manual for Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region,U.S.Army Corps of Engineers, ERDC/EL TR-08-13,April 2008 and the wetland were rated using the Washington State I Rating System for Western Washington Revised(Washington State Department of Ecology, Ecology Publication#04-06-025,August 2004). ' Four non-wetland sites were sampled and described. Six(6)wetland sample sites were established to describe the wetland vegetation,soils and hydrology. Five of the plots were as close as could be established to sample plots site done by the SNR Company on June 6,2011. 1 ' B.NON-WETLAND AREA 1 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS: ' i. Landscape Position: Gentle sloping plain. ii. Slope Gradient: 0 to 5 percent Geological Material: Till and glacial outwash ' iv.Water Types Present Non-regulated drainage ditch ' v.Non-wetland Plots 1,2,3& 4. The following provides general information on plant species, soils and hydrology for the four(4)non-wetland sample sites ' that define the non-wetland area on the property. Detailed vegetation, soils and hydrology is recorded on the field data sheets for the four(4)non-wetlands sample site and can be viewed in Appendix B. 1 Mauney/Rogerson 2 LSWC November 2012 I EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED I vi.Vegetation Cover: Two narrow areas of native trees and shrubs occur along the north east and north west half of the property while the remaining portion of the upland is native and non-native ' herbaceous. The species listed in Table One presents the dominate species recorded on each sample plot. ' TABLE ONE DOMINATE VEGETATION ON UPLAND PLOT SITES* IPLOT VEG. COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME PLANT PERCENT COVER INDICATOR COVER I . STATUS 1 Trees Douglas fir Pseudotsuga douglasii FACU 30 I Shrubs Nootka rose Rosa nutkana FAC 25 Salmonberry Rubus procerus FACU 25 Grasses Dactylis glomerata Orchard grass FACU 60 Holcus lanatus Common velvetgrass FAC 20 ' Tall fescue Festuca arundinacea FAC 20 2 Trees Douglas fir Pseudotsuga douglasii FACU 30 I Shrubs Salal Gaultheria shallop FACU 20 Nootka rose Rosa nutkana FAC 25 Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis FAC 20 I 3 Forbs& Rib plantain Plantago lanceolata FAC 20 grasses Tall fescue Festuca arundinacea FAC 25 IScab fescue Festuca scabra FAC 35 4 Forbs& Rib plantain Plantago lanceolata FAC 25 I grasses Scab fescue Festuca scabra FAC 30 Tall fescue Festuca arundinacea FAC 25 *Only the dominate species are presented in this table which determines hydrophytic under the dominance test. Ivii.Soils I NRCS Soil Map Unit and Series: Whidbey Series' Field Identified Series or Classification: Plot 1 -Indianola Series Plot 2—Whidbey Series I Plot 3 - Indianola Series Plot 4—Indianola Series I 1 Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area,Washington, 1975.Fred R.McCreary,United States Department of ' Agriculture,Soil conservation Service,in cooperation with the Washington Agricultural Experiment Station. ' Mauney/Rogerson 3 LSWC November 2012 I ' EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED ISoil Depth: Very deep Soil Drainage: Somewhat excessively to excessively ' drained. General Soil Profile ISurface and subsurface: Ranges from 6 to 23 inches thick. The horizons are sandy loam, loamy free sand, loamy sand,gravelly i loamy sand, sand or very gravely sandy loam. The horizons have hue of 10YR, 7.YR, or 2.5Y,value 2 through 4 moist,chroma of 1 through 4 moist. The horizons have granular or subangular blocky structure. I Subsoil: Ranges from 10 to 18 inches thick with textures of very gravelly sands, gravelly sands or sand. The horizons ' have hue of 10YR, 7.YR,or 2.5Y, value 3 through 5 moist,chroma of 1 through 4 moist.The horizons have subangular blocky structure or are single grain. I ' Substratum: Starts at 30 to 31 inches from the soil surface. It has textures of very gravelly very fine sand, sand or gravelly I sand. It is massive or loose single grain. If sand is present 5YR 4/6 color lamellae may be present. viii.Water Source For ' Soil Hydrology: Precipitation I ' C. WETLAND AREA 1 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS: i.Landscape Position: Includes gentle sloping plain,flat and depressional. Iii. Slope Gradient: 0 to 5 percent Iiii.Geological Material: Glacial outwash iv.Water Type Present: Non-regulated drainage ditches Iv.Wetland Plots 1,2,3,4,5&6. The following provides general information on plant species, soils and hydrology for the six(6)wetland sample sites that I define the wetland area on the property. Detailed vegetation, soils and hydrology is recorded on the field data sheets for the six(6)wetland sample sites and can be viewed in Appendix B. I IMauney/Rogerson 4 LSWC November 2012 I ' EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED Ivi.Vegetation Cover: The vegetation on the wetland area consists of native and non- native herbaceous and native shrubs. 1 TABLE ONE DOMINATE VEGETATION ON WETLAND PLOT SITES' IPLOT VEG. COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME PLANT PERCENT COVER INDICATOR COVER I I STATUS 1 Grasses \ Rib plantain Plantago lanceolate FAC 30 &Forbs Tall fescue Festuca arundinacea FAC 40 ' Common velvetgrass Holus lanatus FAC 20 I 2 Grasses Slough sedge Carex obnupta OBL 30 Soft rush Juncus effusus FACW 20 Red top Agrostis gigantea FAC 30 Common velvetgrass Holus lanatus _ FAC 20 - ' 3 Grasses Common velvetgrass Holus lanatus FAC 20 & Forbs Tall fescue Festuca arundinacea FAC 25 ' Soft rush Juncus effusus FACW 20 Rib plantain Plantago lanceolate FAC 15 4 Grasses Reed canarygrass Phalaris arundinacea FACW 30 I Soft rush Juncus effusus FACW 20 Slough sedge Carex obnupta OBL 30 Red top Agrostis gigantea FAC 30 ' 5 Grasses Tall fescue Festuca arundinacea FAC 20 &Forbs Soft rush Juncus effusus FACW 40 I6 Grasses Common velvetgrass Holus lanatus FAC 25 Soft rush Juncus effusus FACW 20 Red top Agrostis gigantea FAC 25 I *Only the dominate species are presented in this table which determines hydrophytic under the dominance test. Ivii. Soils I NRCS Soil Map Unit and Series: Whidbey Series and Jan Juan Series' Field Identified Map Unit or Series: Plots 1-6-Aquultic Haploxerolls ISoil Depth: Very deep Soil Drainage: Somewhat Poorly I ' Mauney/Rogerson 5 LSWC November 2012 I 1 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED Hydric Soil Indicators: All —Depleted Below Dark Surface and A 12—Thick Dark Surface ' General Soil Profile Surface and subsurface: Ranges from 9 to 20 inches thick. The horizons have sandy loam, loamy sand or loam textures. The horizons ' have hue of IOYR or 7.5YR,value 2 moist,chroma of 1 or less moist. The horizons have granular or subangular blocky structure. Photo 1 below shows redoximorphic concentrations and also oxidized rhizospheres along living roots that can be present in the lower part of the subsurface. The dark soil color mask most of the redoximorphic concentrations. Photo l IOW ,Oxidtei i n �RedoxmxpNC Features 1 ` ' Subsoil: Depleted soils that Range from 34 to 55 inches thick with textures of very fine sands,fine sands or sand. The first 6 to 10 inches of the subsoil is slightly hard moist. The ' horizons have hue of 10YR or 2.5Y,value 4 through 6 moist,chroma of 1 or 2 moist. Depth of redoximorphic features range from 9 to greater than 64 inches. The ' horizons have subangular blocky structure or massive with both parting to single grain. Some dark color krotovina occur as thin horizontal bands or irregular ' tunnel cross sections2. Photo 2 below shows a cross section of the Aquultic Haploxerolls hydric soil within the wetland showing the ' thick mollic surface and subsurface,the redoximorphic 2 Krotovina is an animal burrow that has been filled with organic or mineral material from another soil horizon. Mauney/Rogerson 6 LSWC November 2012 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONTINUED ' and krotovina features in the underlying subsoil and water table in the wetland.. Photo 2 ' Sample Site 3—26 Nov 12—Water table fmally leveled at approximately 36 inches. N i 9F 1 t � k viii.Water Source For ' Soil Hydrology: Direct precipitation and surface runoff and subsurface saturated flow from precipitation. ' One process causing the wetland is the slightly hard sand lithologic discontinuity subsoil surface causing a restricting downward water movement into the subsoils allowing saturated flows to be maintained longer in the surface and subsurface soils. The upland Whidbey and Indianola Series soils supply subsurface flow to the wetland area. Aquic conditions on the area appear to be the result of an intermittent episaturation soil condition and a longer endosaturation soil condition. 1 1 Mauney/Rogerson 7 LSWC November 2012 1 C. WETLAND DETERMINATION,CLASSIFICATION& DELINEATION ' WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY REVISED 2004 WETLAND RATING SYSTEM FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON ' WETLAND Mauney/Rogerson Section 1 Township.29 North Range 01 East Date: November 2012 TABLE THREE Wetland Category Rating Scores Category I=Score<70 Category II=Score 51-69 Category III=Score 30-50 Cate_ory IV= Score<30 ' TABLE FOUR SPECIAL WETLAND IDENTIFIED TYPES ❑ Estuarine I I/II❑ ❑Natural Heritage I ❑ ❑ Bog I ❑ ' ❑ Mature Forest I ❑ ❑ Old Growth Forest I ❑ ❑ Coastal Lagoon I ❑ II❑ ❑ Interdunal II❑ in❑ ® None of the above II 1 1 1 1 1 Mauney/Rogerson 8 LSWC November 2012 I WETLAND DETERMINATION,CLASSIFICATION&DELINEATION CONTINUED ITABLE FIVE WETLAND HGM CLASS RATINGS AND WETLAND CATEGORY ' WETLAND Mauney/Rogerson WETLAND HCM CLASSES Depressional3 IFUNCTIONS POINTS FOR WETLAND HGM CLASS Notes WATER QUALITY FUNCTION 1.Potential to Improve 7 _ I 2.Opportunity Improve(Yes,2 x points in 1) 2 (No,1 x points in 1) TOTAL WATER QUALITY FUNCTION 14 I HYDROLOGIC FUNCTION 1.Potential for Decreasing Flooding and 6 Erosion _ 2.Opportunity for Decreasing Flooding and I I Erosion.(Yes,2 x points in 1),(No,1 x points in 1) _ 1 TOTAL HYDROLOGY FUNCTION 6 I I HABITAT FUNCTION 1.Potential for Habitat 5 2.Opportunity for Habitat 10 TOTAL HABITAT FUNCTION 15 ITOTAL SCORE 35 III FINAL CATEGORY I I1.WETLAND DELINEATION The wetland boundary is marked with 3"x 5"orange plastic wire whips. The wetland whips are I consecutively numbered. The whips have the station numbers,the date the boundary was established and the lettering LSWC indicating Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting as the delineator. Each wetland whip has an orange wetland boundary ribbon attached to it. ' The wetland area associated with the tax parcel is shown in the preliminary survey plat drawing in Appendix C. The bearings and distances of the wetland stations for the wetland boundary in the drawing of this report were established by survey preformed by field traverse methods using a 5 second ' Topcon GTS-235W total station and steel tape. I I 3 The wetland contains flat,slope and depressional HGM Classes within its boundary. The Depressional HGM IClass was used for rating the wetland category. ' Mauney/Rogerson 9 LSWC November 2012 WETLAND DETERMINATION,CLASSIFICATION&DELINEATION CONTINUED 2.WETLAND BUFFER •' The short platting of the parcel will provide additional parcels that proposes to have single-family residential use on each parcels of one(1)acre or larger. The parcel size meets the wetland category for moderate impact land use(JCC 18.22.330 Table 18.22.330(2)). Under moderate impact land use the buffer for this Category III wetland is 60 feet because the habitat function score(Table 5)is less than the ' 20-28 points required to have the maximum buffer of 110 feet. Mauney/Rogerson 10 LSWC November 2012 I I I I I 1 I I I PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 APPENDIX A 1 FIELD DATA SHEETS 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 ' WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Regions Project/Site: Mauney/Rogerson Marrowstone Parcel 921094026 City/County:/Jefferson Sampling Date:5 Nov 12 I Applicant/Owner: Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T State: WA Sampling Point: Upland Plot 1 Investigator(s):W.David Loggy,Loggy Wetlands&Soil Consulting Section,Township,Range: SE1/4,S9,T29N,R1E Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc):low gradient outwash slope Local relief(concave,convex,none): straight slope I Slope(%)0-2 Subregion(LRR):A I Lat:N 48.01565 I Long:W-122.67648 Datum:WGS 84 I Soil Map Unit Name: Whidbey Series(See soil remarks on 2"d page,) f NWI classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are vegetation ❑, Soil 0,or Hydrology ®significantly disturbed?No Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ Are vegetation 0, Soil ❑,or Hydrology ❑naturally problematic? No I ([f needed,explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is the Sampled Area I Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® Within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No El Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No El Remarks: I VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Trees Stratum (50'r Plot size:) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)3 I 1.Pseudotsuga douglasii 30 Yes FACU 2.Alnus rubra 10 No FAC Total;Number of dominant Species Across All Strata: (B)6 I 3• Percent of Dominant Species 4 That Are OBL,FCW,or FAC: (A/B)50 40%=Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: I Total%Cover of: Multiply by: Sanline/Shrub Stratum(15' R Plot size) 1.Rosa nutkana 25 Yes FAC OBL species X 1 = I 2.Rubus procerus 25 Yes FACU FACW species X 2= 3. FAC species X 3 = 4. FACU species X 4= 5. UPL Species X 5 = 4. Column totals (A) (B) I 5•• Prevalence index=B/A- 50%-Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: I Herb Stratum (5'r Plot size: ) ❑ 1.Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 1.Dactylis glomerata 60 Yes FACU ❑2.Dominance Test is>50% 2.Holcus lanatus 20 Yes FAC 1 3.Festuca arundinacea 20 Yes FAC ❑3.Prevalence Index is<3.0' 4. ❑4.Morphological Adaptations'(Provide 5. supporting data in Remarks or on a separate 6 sheet) 7. ❑ 5.Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 8. I ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' 9. (Explain) 100%=Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must IWood Vine Stratum(Plot size be present. 2. Hydrophytic Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes❑ No Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: The site plot was one of the sites for septic field site. The pit was within a shrub area on the edge of the forest area. I i iS Army Corns of Engineers Western Maintains-Valleys and Coast-Version 2.0 ISOIL Sampling Point: Upland Plot 1 Profile Description: (Describe t o the depth needed to document the indicators or confirm the absence of indicators) Depth Matrix Redox Features ' (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Textures Remarks 0 to 9 7.5YR 3/2 Is Weak fine granular/many fine,medium and common course roots/cw bndy I 9 to 21 7.5YR 3/4 s weak fine granular parting to single grain/ many fine,medium and common course roots /cw bndy I 21 to 31 2.5Y 4/3 s Single grain/loose dry/many very fine and fine roots/cw bndy 31 to 40 7.5YR 4/3 s Massive parting to single grain/this horizon has 5YR 4/6 continuous and discontinuous I one inch wide lamellae/slightly hard when moist I 'Type:Concentrations,D Depletion.RM=Reduced Matrix.CXSovered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: PI=Pore lining, RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3` ❑Histosol(Al) ❑Sandy Redox(SS) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) ' ❑Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2) E l Black Histic(M) El Loamy Mucky Mineral(Fl)(except MLRA 1) El Other(Explain in Remarks 3 El Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ' ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3 ❑Sandy Mucky Mineral(Si) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Indicators of hydrology must vegetation and ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. I Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No El Depth(inches): Remarks:The soil at the site is not Whidbey Series as shown on Jefferson County Survey. It is sandy but lacks gravel in the profile to be the I San Juan or Whidbey Series. It is an excessively drained soil because of the sandy textures HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) I ❑Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water Stained Leaves(B9)(MRLA 1,2, ❑High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A and 4B) El Saturation(A3) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) I ❑Water Marks(Bl) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) (C9) ❑Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) I ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils(C6) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl')(LRR A) ❑FAC=Neutral Test(D5) ❑inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑Other(Explain in remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ' El Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface(B8) El Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) Field Observations Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): ISaturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No El (includes capillary fringe) ' Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: I US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 IWETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Regions Project/Site: Mauney/Rogerson Marrowstone Parcel 921094026 City/County:/Jefferson _ Sampling Date:5 Nov 12 I Applicant/Owner: Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T State: WA Sampling Point: Upland Plot 2 Investigator(s):W.David Loggy,Loggy Wetlands&Soil Consulting Section,Township,Range: SEl/,SO,T29N,R1E Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc):Low gradient outwash slope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Straight I Slope(%) 0-2 Subregion(LRR):A Lat:N 48.01595 I Long:W-122.67925 Datum:WAS 84 I Soil Map Unit Name: Whidbey Series(See Soil Remarks on Page 2. I NWI classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are vegetation 0, Soil ❑,or Hydrology ❑significantly disturbed? NO Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ' Are vegetation 0, Soil ❑,or Hydrology ❑naturally problematic? No (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Is the Sampled Area IHydric Soil Present? Yes El No ® Within a Wetland? Yes El No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No IZ El Remarks: IVEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Trees Stratum (10'r Plot size: ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That I1.Pseudotsuga douglasii 50 Yes FACU Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)2 2. Total;Number of dominant Species Across All Strata: (B)4 I 3. Percent of Dominant Species 4 That Are OBL,FCW,or FAC: (A/B)50 50%=Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: I Total%Cover of: Multiply by: Saplinu/Shrub Stratum(15' R Plot size) 1.Gaultheria shallon 50 Yes FACU OBL species X 1 = I2.Rubus spectabilis 20 Yes FAC FACW species X 2= 3.Symphoricarpos alba 5 No FACU FAC species X 3 = 4.Rosa nutkana 20 Yes FAC FACU species X 4= II5.Salix Scouleriana 5 No FAC UPL Species X 5= 4. Column totals (A) (B) I 5.. Prevalence index=B/A= 100 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ' ' Herb Stratum (Plot size:) ❑ 1.Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 1. ❑2.Dominance Test is>50% 2. ' 3 ❑3.Prevalence Index is<3.0' 4• ❑4.Morphological Adaptations'(Provide 5 supporting data in Remarks or on a separate I sheet) 6. 7. ❑5.Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' I 8. ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' 9. (Explain) =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must ' Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size) be present. 1. 2. Hydrophytic Vegetation I =Total Cover Present? Yes El No%Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: The site plot was one of the sites for septic field site. The pit was within a shrub area on the edge of a forest area. ' SOIL Sampling Point: Upland Plot 2 Profile Description: (Describe t o the depth needed to document the indicators or confirm the absence of indicators) ' Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Typei Loc2 Textures Remarks 0 to 8 10YR 3/2 grls Weak fine granular/common fine,medium, course roots/20%gravel/cw bndy ' 8 to 20 1OYR 4/4 vgsl Weak medium subangular blocky/to weak fine granular/few medium,coarse roots/35 %gravel/cw bndy I 20 to 25 1OYR 4/4 (dry) vgrls Weak medium subangular blocky/to weak fine granular/few medium,coarse roots/35 %gravel/cw bndy I 25 to 30 2.5Y 5/4 vgrls Massive/slightly hard dry/few coarse roots/ (dry) weakly cemented/50%gravel,aw bndy. 30 to 44 l OYR 5/1 80- 1OYR 4/4 >2 C M s Massive/slightly hard moist/5%gravel/ 98 <20 few medium roots I 'Type:Concentrations,D=Depletion.RM.—Reduced Matrix.CXS Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: P1=Pore lining, RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': ❑Histosol(Al) ❑Sandy Redox(SS) ❑2 cm Muck(Al0) ' ❑Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2) ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(Fl)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks 3 ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al 1) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ' ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present,unless ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): IType: Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No Depth(inches): El Remarks:This soil meets the range of the characteristics for the Whidbey Series. The soil at the site sampled is a moderately well drained. I HYDROLOGY IWetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) ❑Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water Stained Leaves(B9)(MRLA 1,2, I ❑High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A and 4B) ❑Saturation(A3) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(Bl3) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery I ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) (C9) ❑Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils(C6) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl')(LRR A) ❑FAC=Neutral Test(135) ' ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑Other(Explain in remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) 0 Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface(B8) El Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) ' Field Observations I Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No El I (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: ' Remarks: I US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Regions Project/Site: Mauney/Rogerson Marrowstone Parcel 921094026 City/County:/Jefferson Sampling Date:26 Nov 12 ' Applicant/Owner: Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T State: WA Sampling Point: Upland Plot 3 Investigator(s):W.David Loggy,Loggy Wetlands&Soil Consulting Section,Township,Range: SE1/4,S9,T29N,R1E Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc):Low gradient outwash slope or plain Local relief(concave,convex,none): Straight I Slope(%)0-2 Subregion(LRR):A 1 Lat:N 48.01479 j Long:W-122.67833 I Datum:WGS 84 I Soil Map Unit Name: Jan Juan Series(See soil remarks on 2°d page,) NWI classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are vegetation 0, Soil ❑,or Hydrology ❑significantly disturbed?No Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ Are vegetation ❑, Soil ❑,or Hydrology ❑naturally problematic? No (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No Is the Sampled Area ' Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ® Within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No El Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No ill Remarks: ' VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Trees Stratum (50'r Plot size:) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That 1 Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)3 2. Total;Number of dominant Species Across All Strata: (B)3 3. Percent of Dominant Species 4 That Are OBL,FCW,or FAC: (A/B) 100 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: ISapling/Shrub Stratum(15'R Plot size) Total%Cover of: Multiply bv: 1. OBL species X 1 = 2. FACW species X 2= 3. FAC species X 3= 4• FACU species X 4= I5• UPL Species X 5= 4. Column totals (A) (B) II 5.. Prevalence index=B/A= 50%=Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Herb Stratum (5'r Plot size: ) ❑ 1.Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 1.Plantago Lanceolata 20 Yes FAC ❑2.Dominance Test is>50% 2.Holcus lanatus 10 No FAC 3.Festuca arundinacea 25 Yes FAC ❑3.Prevalence Index is<3.01 4.Agrostis scabra 35 Yes FAC ❑4.Morphological Adaptations1(Provide 5. Lolium perenne 10 Yes FAC supporting data in Remarks or on a separate 6 sheet) 7• ❑5.Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 8. ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' 9• (Explain) 100%=Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size:) be present. I I. 2. Hydrophytic Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes® No❑ I %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: I I JS Army Cams of Engineers Western Mountains Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 ISOIL Sampling Point: Upland Plot 3 Profile Description: (Describe t o the depth needed to document the indicators or confirm the absence of indicators) Depth Matrix Redox Features ' (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Textures Remarks 0 to 6 1OYR 2/1 sl Mod.fine granular/many very fine,fine roots/cw body I 6 to 17 7.5YR 2/1, Is Mod.medium subangular blocky parting to mod fine granular/common very fine,fine roots/aw body I 17 to 24 1OYR 2/1 50 Is 30% 10YR2/1 fire charcoal/weak to mod. 5YR 4/4 30 subangular block parting to mod. medium angular/few very fine,fine roots I 24 to 30 2.5Y 4/3& grvfs Single grain/few very fine roots/15%gravel 3/3 30 to 36 Multi color(2.5Y 4/3,3/2,3/3m grvfs Single grain/loose/30%small&medium 4/4) gravel I 'Type:Concentrations,D=Depletion.RM=Reduced Matrix.CXS Covered or Coated Sand Grains. Location: Pl=Pore lining, RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3' ❑ Histosol(Al) ❑Sandy Redox(SS) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) t ❑Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2) ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(Fl)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks 3 ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al l) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ' ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral(SI) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present,unless ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): I Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? But Yes ❑ No Remarks:The soil at the site is not the Jan Juan or Whidbey Series as shown on Jefferson County Survey. It is sandy but lack the required gravel in the upper part of the soil to be either Series. It is an excessively drained soil because of the sandy textures. No series found for this I site. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators IPrimary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) ❑Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water Stained Leaves(B9)(MRLA 1,2, ❑High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A and 4B) I ❑Saturation(A3) ❑ Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(BI0) ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) (C9) I ❑Algal Mat or Crust(134) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils(C6) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl')(LRR A) ❑FAC=Neutral Test(D5) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑Other(Explain in remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ' ❑ Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface(BS) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) IField Observations Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): IWater Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No El (includes capillary fringe) ' Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: I Remarks:There was no standing water down to 36 inches and there was no evidence of saturated flow percolating through the36 inches of excavated soil from the recent intensive rain periods during the two week before. US Army Corps of'Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 I ' WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Regions Project/Site: Mauney/Rogerson Marrowstone Parcel 921094026 City/County:/Jefferson Sampling Date:26 Nov 12 I Applicant/Owner: Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T State: WA Sampling Point: Upland Plot 4 Investigator(s):W.David Loggy,Loggy Wetlands&Soil Consulting Section,Township,Range: SE1/4,S9,T29N,R1E Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc):Low gradient outwash plain or slope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Straight I Slope(%)0-2 Subregion(LRR):A I Lat:N 48.01519 I Long:W-122.67727 Datum:WGS 84 I Soil Map Unit Name: Whidbey Series(See soil notes on 2"page,) I NWI classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are vegetation 0, Soil ❑,or Hydrology ❑significantly disturbed?No Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ I Are vegetation El, Soil 0,or Hydrology ❑naturally problematic? No (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transacts,important features,etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No Is the Sampled Area ' Hydric Soil Present? Yes El No ® Within a Wetland? Yes El No ►�� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No El Remarks: I VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Trees Stratum (50'r Plot size:) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That . 2 Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)3 I 2. Total;Number of dominant Species Across All Strata: (B)3 3• I 4 Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL,FCW,or FAC: (A/B)100 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: ISavlin¢/Shrub Stratum(15'R Plot size) Total%Cover of: Multiply by: I. Rosa nutkana 2 No FAC OBL species X 1 = 2. I 3. FACW species X 2= FAC species X 3 = 4. FACU species X 4= ' 5. UPL Species X 5 = 4. Column totals (A) (B) I 5•• Prevalence index=B/A= 2%=Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: I Herb Stratum (5' r Plot size:) ❑ 1.Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 1.Plantago lanceolata 25 Yes FAC 2.Agrostis scabra 30 Yes FAC ❑2.Dominance Test is>50% ' 3.Festuca arundinacea 25 Yes FAC ❑3.Prevalence Index is<3.0' 4. Achillea millefolium 3 No FACU ❑4.Morphological Adaptations'(Provide 5.Lolium perenne 15 No FAC supporting data in Remarks or on a separate I 6 sheet) 7. ❑5. Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 8. ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' I 9. (Explain) 100%=Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must I Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size:) be present. 1. 2. Hydrophytic Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes® No❑ I %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: ' US Army Corns of Engineers Western Mountains_Valleys and Coast—Version 211 SOIL Sampling Point: Upland Plot 4 Profile Description: (Describe t o the depth needed to document the indicators or confirm the absence of indicators) Depth Matrix Redox Features ' (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Textures Remarks 0 to 8 10YR 3/2 Ifs Weak medium subangular parting to mod. 111 fine granular/many very fine,fine roots/cw bndy 8 to 15 7.5YR 3/3 Ifs Weak fine subangular blocky parting to weak &3/4 dry fine granular/common very fine,fine roots/ I cw body 15 to 26 7.5YR 3/3 s Weak fine subangular blocky parting to weak &4/4 dry fine granular/few very fine roots I 26 to 36 Multi color(2.5Y 4/3,3/2,3/3, grs Single grain/few very fine roots/15%gravel 4/4) 'Type:Concentrations,D=Depletion.RM=Reduced Matrix.CXS Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2-Location: P1=Pore lining, RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix IHydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3c ❑Histosol(Al) ❑Sandy Redox(SS) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) ❑Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2) I ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) El Other(Explain in Remarks 3 ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) s ' ❑Sandy Mucky Mineral(SI) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Indicators of hydrology must vegetation and ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): I Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No El Depth(inches): Remarks:The soil at the site is not the Jan Juan or Whidbey Series as shown on Jefferson County Survey. It is sandy but lack the gravel in the soils to be the San Juan or Whidbey Series. It is an excessively drained soil because of the sandy textures. Meets range of characteristics I of the Indianola Series HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) IEl Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water Stained Leaves(B9)(MRLA 1,2, ❑High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A and 4B) ❑ Saturation(A3) ❑Salt Crust(BI1) El Drainage Patterns(B10) I ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B)3) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(CI) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery El Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) (C9) ❑Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron C4 I ( ) ❑Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils(C6) El Shallow Aquitard(D3) El Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl')(LRR A) ❑FAC=Neutral Test(D5) El Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑Other(Explain in remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ' El Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface(B8) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) I Field Observations Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes El No ® Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No (includes capillary fringe) ' Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:There was no standing water down to 36 inches and there was no evidence of saturated flow percolating through the36 inches of Iexcavated soil from the recent intensive rain periods from the two week before. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 IWETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Regions Project/Site: Mauney/Rogerson Marrowstone Parcel 921094026 City/County:/Jefferson Sampling Date: 11 Nov 12 ' Applicant/Owner:Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T State: WA Sampling Point: Wetland Plot 1 Investigator(s):Kim Meehan/Meehan Roulst Consulting Section,Township,Range: SE1/4,S9,T29N,R1E Landform(hilislope,terrace,etc):Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none):Flat I Slope(%)0-2 Subregion(LRR):A I Lat:N 48.01449 Long:W-122.67807 I Datum:WGS 84 I Soil Map Unit Name:San Juan Gravelly Sandy Loam(See soil remarks on Page 2) NWI classification:PEMC&PEMA Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain inl Remarks.) Are vegetation ❑, Soil 0,or Hydrology ®significantly disturbed?No Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ I Are vegetation ❑, Soil ❑,or Hydrology El naturally problematic?No (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area I Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No El Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: I VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Trees Stratum (50'r Plot size:) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That 1 Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)3 2. Total;Number of dominant Species Across All Strata: (B)3 I 3. Percent of Dominant Species 4 That Are OBL,FCW,or FAC: (AB)100 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: I Total%Cover of Multiply by: Sapling/Shrub Stratum(15' R Plot size) 1. OBL species X 1 = I 2. FACW species X 2= 3. FAC species X 3= 4. FACU species X 4= I5. UPL Species X 5= 4. Column totals (A) (B) I 5•• Prevalence index=B/A= 50%=Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: I Herb Stratum (5'r Plot size:) ❑ 1.Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 1.Plantago lanceolata 30 Yes FAC 2.Festuca arundinacea 40 Yes FAC ®2.Dominance Test is>50% ' 3.Ranunculus repens 10 No FACW ❑3.Prevalence Index is 53.0' 4.Agrostis gigantea 10 No FAC ❑4.Morphological Adaptations'(Provide 5.Holus lanatus 20 Yes FAC supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) I 6 7. ❑5.Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 8. I ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' 9. (Explain) 100%-Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size:) be present. I 1. 2. Hydrophytic Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes® No❑ %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks. ' t IS Army Corns of Fnpineers Western Mountains.Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 ISOIL Sampling Point: Wetland Plot 1 Profile Description: (Describe t o the depth needed to document the indicators or confirm the absence of indicators) Depth Matrix Redox Features I (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Textures Remarks 0 to 10 10YR 2/2 sI Weak subangular blocky/few fine&many I medium roots/clear irregular body 10 to 20+ 2.5Y 5/2 30 7.5YR 4/6 40 C M s Massive parting to single grain/30% 10YR 2/2 krotovina horizontal to and near the surface/ I I1Type:Concentrations,D Depletion.RM=Reduced Matrix.CXS�overed or Coated Sand Grams. 2-Location: P1=Pore lining, RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3 ❑Histosol(Al) ❑Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) ' ❑Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2) ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(Fl)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks 3 ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ®Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ' ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3 ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Indicators of hydrology must vegetation and ❑Sand Gleyed Matrix(S4) wetland hydrology must be present,unless Y Y ( ) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) disturbed or problematic. I Restrictive Layer(if present): Type:Lithologic discontinuity Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches): 10 Remarks:The soil at this plot site is not the San Juan Series as it does not have any gravel throughout the 23 inches described. No soil series Icould be found for the soils in the wetland. They would be classified as Aquultic Haploxerolls HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators IPrimary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) ❑Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water Stained Leaves(B9)(MRLA 1,2, ' ❑High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A and 4B) ❑Saturation(A3) ❑ Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ®Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery ' ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) (C9) ❑Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ®Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils(C6) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(DI')(LRR A) ❑FAC=Neutral Test(D5) ' El Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑Other(Explain in remarks) El Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface(B8) 0 Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) ' Field Observations Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): ' Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):52 inches Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):52 inches Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ I (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: I Remarks:All horizons were moist to the top of the water table. Wetland Hydrology was check as being present because soon after the sample plots were described two storm periods delivered sufficient precipitation resulting in ponding to occur in the shallow depression in the slope and flat area and surface flow from the depression area of the wetland. ' US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 IWETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Regions Project/Site: Mauney/Rogerson Marrowstone Parcel 921094026 City/County:/Jefferson Sampling Date:9 Nov 12 I Applicant/Owner: Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T State: WA Sampling Point: Wetland Plot 2 Investigator(s):W.David Loggy,Loggy Wetlands&Soil Consulting Section,Township,Range:SE1/4,S9,T29N,R5E Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc):Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none):Flat I Slope(%) 0-2 Subregion(LRR):A I Lat:N 48.01461 Long:W-122.67807 F Datum:WGS 84 I Soil Map Unit Name: Whidbey Series(See soil remarks on Page 2) NWI classification:PEMC&PEMA Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are vegetation ❑, Soil ❑,or Hydrology ❑significantly disturbed? No Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ I Are vegetation ❑, Soil 0,or Hydrology ❑naturally problematic? No (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area I Hydric Soil Present? Yes tEl No ❑ Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: I VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Trees Stratum (50'r Plot size:) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)4 I L 2. Total;Number of dominant Species Across All Strata: (B)4 I 3. Percent of Dominant Species (C) 100 4 That Are OBL,FCW,or FAC: =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: ISapling/Shrub Stratum (15' R Plot size) Total%Cover of: Multiply by: I.Rosa nutkana 10 No FAC OBL species X 1 = I 2.3. FACW species X 2= FAC species X 3 = 4• FACU species X 4= ' 5. UPL Species X 5 = 4. Column totals (A) (B) I S•• 10%=Total Cover Prevalence index-B/A= Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ' Herb Stratum (5' r Plot size:) ❑ 1.Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 1.Carex obnupta 30 Yes OBL ®2.Dominance Test is>50% 2.Juncos effusus 20 Yes FACW ' 3.Agrostis gigantea 30 Yes FAC ❑3.Prevalence Index is<3.0' 4.Holus lanatus 20 Yes FAC ❑4.Morphological Adaptations'(Provide 5. supporting data in Remarks or on a separate I 6 sheet) 7. ❑5.Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 8. I 9 ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 100%=Total Cover Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size:) be present. 1. 2. Hydrophytic Vegetation ' =Total Cover Present? Yes® No ID Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks:. ' ITS Army Corns of Engineers Western Mountains.Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 ISOIL Sampling Point: Wetland Plot 2 Profile Description: (Describe t o the depth needed to document the indicators or confirm the absence of indicators) Depth Matrix Redox Features ' (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loci Textures Remarks 0 to 6 7.5YR 2.5/1 sl Weak fine granular/many,fine,medium and I few course roots/cw bndy 6 to 12 10YR 3/2 Is Weak fine subangular blocky/few fine, coarse roots/cw bndy 12 to 18 1OYR 4/2 80 10YR 4/6 20 C M s Weak fine subangular blocky/few fine I coarse roots 18 to 58 10YR 4/1 80 10YR 4/6 20 C M s Massive parting to single grain I 'Type:Concentrations,[Depletion.RM=Reduced Matrix.CXS- overed or Coated Sand Grains. 2-Location: P1=Pore lining, RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3` ❑Histosol(Al) ❑Sandy Redox(SS) ❑2 cm Muck(AIO) 1 ❑Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2) ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks 3 ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ®Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ' ®Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3 ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral(SI) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Indicators of hydrology must vegetation and ❑Sand Gleyed Matrix(S4) wetland hydrology must be present,unless y y ( ) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): IType:Lithologic discontinuity Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches): 12 to 24 Remarks:The dark surface and subsurface ranged from 12 to 22 inches thick in the trench. The soil at this plot site is not the San Juan Series I as it does not have any gravel throughout the 23 inches described. No soil series could be found for the soils in the wetland. They would be classified as Aquultic Haploxerolls HYDROLOGY I Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more re wired) ❑ Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water Stained Leaves(B9)(MRLA 1,2, I ❑High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A and 4B) ❑Saturation(A3) ❑Salt Crust(BI1) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ®Thy-Season Water Table(C2) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery I ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) (C9) ❑Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ®Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils(C6) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl')(LRR A) ®FAC=Neutral Test(D5) I ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑Other(Explain in remarks) 0 Raised Mt Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface(B8) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) IField Observations I Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No El Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):51 inches ' Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):51 inches Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: IRemarks:All horizons were moist to the top of the standing water in the trench. Soil has vegetation on hummocks in this area that results in inundation during fall and winter recharge and into the early growing season. Wetland Hydrology was check as being present because soon after the sample plots were described two storm periods delivered sufficient precipitation resulting in ponding to occur in the shallow Idepression in the slope and flat area and surface flow from the depression area of the wetland. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 IWETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Regions Project/Site: Mauney/Rogerson Marrowstone Parcel 921094026 City/County:/Jefferson Sampling Date: 11 Nov 12 Applicant/Owner:Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T WA Sampling Point: Wetland Plot 3 Investigator(s):Kim Meehan/Meehan Roulst Consulting Section Township,Range: SE1I4,S9,T29N,R1E Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc):Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none):Flat Slope(%)0-2 Subregion(LRR):A 1 Lat:N 48.01399 Long:W-122.67809 1 Datum:WGS 84 ' Soil Map Unit Name:San Juan Gravelly Sandy Loam(See soil remarks on Page 2) NWI classification:PEMC&PEMA Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are vegetation 0, Soil ❑,or Hydrology ❑significantly disturbed?No Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No El Are vegetation 0, Soil 0,or Hydrology ❑naturally problematic?No (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) ' SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area I Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Within a Wetland? Yes ® No El Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: ' VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Trees Stratum (50'r Plot size: ) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That 1. Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)4 2. Total;Number of dominant Species Across All Strata: (B)4 I 3. Percent of Dominant Species 4 That Are OBL,FCW,or FAC: (A/B)100 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: ' Sapling/Shrub Stratum(15'R Plot size) Total%Cover of: Multiply by: I. OBL species X 1 = 2. FACW species X 2= 3. FAC species X 3= 4. FACU species X 4= 5. UPL Species X 5= 4. Column totals (A) (B) I 5.. Prevalence index=B/A= =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: Herb Stratum (5'r Plot size:) ❑ 1.Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 1. Holus lanatus 20 Yes FAC ®2.Dominance Test is>50% 2.Festuca arundinacea 25 Yes FAC ' 3.Juncus effusus 20 Yes FACW ❑3.Prevalence Index is<3.0' 4.Ranunculus repens 10 No FACW El 4.Morphological Adaptations'(Provide 5.Plantago lanceolata 15 Yes FAC supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) ' 6.Agrostis gigantea 10 No FAC 7. ❑5.Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 8. I ' ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' 9• (Explain) 100%=Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size:) be present. 1 2. Hydrophytic Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes® No❑ ' %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks. ' ITS Army Corns nfF.npineers Western Mountains_Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 ' SOIL Sampling Point: Wetland Plot 3 Profile Description: (Describe t o the depth needed to document the indicators or confirm the absence of indicators) ' Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type1 Loc2 Textures Remarks 0 to 9 10YR 2/1 sl Weak granular/many fine&common I medium roots/gradual irregular bndy 9 to 19 2.5Y 5/1 70 7.5YR 4/6 30 C M s Few fine roots/gradual irregular bndy 19+ 2.5Y 6/2 90 7.5YR 5/6 10 C M fs I Type:C=Concentrations,I. Depletion.RM=Reduced Matrix.CXS Covered or Coated Sand Grains. zLocation: PI=Pore lining, RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix I Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: ❑Histosol(Al) ❑ Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(Al0) ❑Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑ Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2) ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks 3 ' ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ®Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) s ❑Sandy Mucky Mineral(Si) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and I ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ I Depth(inches): Remarks:The soil at this plot site is not the San Juan Series as it does not have any gravel throughout the 23 inches described. No soil series could be found for the soils in the wetland. They would be classified as Aquultic Haploxerolls I HYDROLOGY IWetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply1 Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) ' ❑Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water Stained Leaves(B9)(MRLA 1,2, ❑High Water Table(A2) MLRA I,2,4A,and 4B) 4A and 4B) ❑Saturation(A3) ❑ Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ®Dry-Season Water Table(C2) I ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) (C9) ❑Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) 0 Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils(C6) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D3) I ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl')(LRR A) ❑FAC=Neutral Test(D5) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑Other(Explain in remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface(B8) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) IField Observations ISurface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):53 inches ' Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):53 inches Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑ (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:All horizons were moist to the top of the water table. Wetland Hydrology was check as being present because soon after the sample I P plots were described two storm periods delivered sufficient precipitation resulting in ponding to occur in the shallow depression in the slope and flat area and surface flow from the depression area of the wetland. IUS Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 I ' WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Regions Project/Site: Mauney/Rogerson Marrowstone Parcel 921094026 City/County:/Jefferson Sampling Date:9 Nov 12 I Applicant/Owner:Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T State: WA Sampling Point: Wetland Plot 4 Investigator(s):W.David Loggy/Loggy Wetlands&Soil Consulting Section,Township,Range: SE1/4,S9,T29N,R1E Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc):Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none):Flat I Slope(%)0-2 Subregion(LRR):A I Lat:N 48.01366 Long:W-122.67827 I Datum:WGS 84 I Soil Map Unit Name:San Juan Gravelly Sandy Loam(See soil remarks on Page 2) NWI classification:PEMC&PEMA Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are vegetation ❑, Soil ❑,or Hydrology ®significantly disturbed?No Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ Are vegetation 0, Soil ❑,or Hydrology ❑naturally problematic?No I (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area I Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: I VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Trees Stratum (50'r Plot size:) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)4 I 1. 2. Total;Number of dominant Species Across All Strata: (B)4 I 3• Percent of Dominant Species 4 That Are OBL,FCW,or FAC: (A/B)100 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: ' Total%Cover of: Multiply bv: Salaling/Shrub Stratum(15'R Plot size) 1. OBL species X 1 = I 2.3. FACW species X 2= FAC species X 3= 4. FACU species X 4= I5. UPL Species X 5= 4. Column totals (A) (B) I S•• 50%=Total Cover Prevalence index=B/A= Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: I Herb Stratum (5'r Plot size:) ❑ 1.Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 1.Phalaris arundinacea 30 Yes FACW ®2.Dominance Test is>50% 2.Carex obnupta 30 Yes OBL ' 3.Juncus effusus 20 Yes FACW ❑3.Prevalence Index is 53.0' 4. Agrostis gigantea 20 Yes FAC El 4.Morphological Adaptations'(Provide 5, supporting data in Remarks or on a separate I 6 sheet) 7. ❑5.Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 8. I ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' 9• (Explain) 100%=Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size) ' 1. be present. 2. Hydrophytic Vegetation ' =Total Cover Present? Yes® No❑ Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: The site plot was one of the site for septic field site. The pit was within a shrub area on the edge of a forest area. ' IIS Army Corns of Western Mountains_Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 ISOIL Sampling Point: Wetland Plot 4 Profile Description: (Describe t o the depth needed to document the indicators or confirm the absence of indicators) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Typer Loc2 Textures Remarks 0 to 6 7.5YR 2.5/1 I Weak fine granular/many very fine,fine, I medium and few course roots/cw body 6 to 18 7.5YR 2.5/1 1 moderate fine granular parting to single grain/common fine,medium course roots/ cw bndy ' 18 to 61 1OYR 5/1 <80 10YR4/6 >20 C M s Massive parting to single grain ' 1Type:Concentrations,D Depletion.RM=Reduced Matrix.CXS Covered or Coated Sand Grains. (Location: P1=Pore lining, RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3' ❑Histosol(Al) ❑Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) ' ❑Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2) ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(Fl)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks 3 ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ' ®Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3 ❑Sandy Mucky Mineral(Si) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Indicators of hydrology must vegetation and ['Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. I Restrictive Layer(if present): Type:Lithologic discontinuity Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches): 12 to IS Remarks:The soil at this plot site is not the San Juan Series as it does not meet gravel requirement throughout the 61 inches described. No ' soil series could be found for the soils in the wetland. They would be classified as Aquultic Haploxerolls IHYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators I Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) ❑ Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water Stained Leaves(B9)(MRLA 1,2, ❑High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A and 4B) I I=1 Saturation(A3) ❑Salt Crust(Bl1) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ❑Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ®Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) (C9) I ❑Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ®Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils(C6) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl')(LRR A) ®FAC=Neutral Test(D5) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑Other(Explain in remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ' ❑Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface(B8) 0 Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) ' Field Observations Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): IWater Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):55 inches Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):55 inches Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:All horizons were moist to the top of the water table. Wetland Hydrology was check as being present because soon after the sample I plots were described two storm periods delivered sufficient precipitation resulting in ponding to occur in the shallow depression in the slope and flat area and surface flow from the depression area of the wetland. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—Version 2M ' WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Regions Project/Site: Mauney/Rogerson Marrowstone Parcel 921094026 City/County:/Jefferson Sampling Date: 11 Nov 12 I Applicant/Owner:Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T State: WA Sampling Point: Wetland Plot 5 Investigator(s):Kim Meehan/Meehan Roulst Consulting Section,Township,Range: SE1/4,S9,T29N,R1E Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc):Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none):Flat Slope(%)0-2 Subregion(ERR):A Lat:N 48.01331 Long:W-122.67863 1 Datum:WGS 84 I Soil Map Unit Name:San Juan Gravelly Sandy Loam(See soil remarks on Page 2) NWI classification:PEMC&PEMA Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are vegetation 0, Soil ❑,or Hydrology ❑significantly disturbed?No Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ I Are vegetation El, Soil 0,or Hydrology ❑naturally problematic?No (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area I Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: I VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Trees Stratum (50'r Plot size:) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That L Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)2 2• Total;Number of dominant Species Across All Strata: (B)2 ' 3• Percent of Dominant Species 4 That Are OBL,FCW,or FAC: (A/B) 100 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: ' Sapling/Shrub Stratum(15'R Plot size) Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 1. OBL species X 1 = 2. FACW species X 2= ' 3. FAC species X 3= 4. FACU species X 4= I5. UPL Species X 5= 4. Column totals (A) (B) I 5.. Prevalence index=B/A= =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ' Herb Stratum (5'r Plot size:) ❑ 1.Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 1.Phalaris arundinacea 10 No FACW ®2.Dominance Test is>50% 2.Festuca arundinacea 20 Yes FAC t 3.Juncus effusus 40 Yes FACW ❑3.Prevalence Index is<3.0' 4.Festuca pratense 10 No FACU ❑4.Morphological Adaptations'(Provide 5.Rosa Nutkana 10 No FAC supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) I 6.Holcus lanatus 10 No FAC 7. ❑ 5.Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 8. I ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' 9• (Explain) 100%=Total over - 'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must I Woody Vine Stratum(Plot size:) be present. 1• 2. Hydrophytic Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes® No❑ I %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks. ' ITS Army Corns of Engineers Western Mountains.Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 ISOIL Sampling Point: Wetland Plot 5 Profile Description: (Describe t o the depth needed to document the indicators or confirm the absence of indicators) ' Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Textures Remarks 0 to 11 10YR 2/1 1 Medium angular blocky/many fine,medium ' roots/cw body 11 to 23 2.5Y 5/2 90 7.5YR 5/6 10 C M fs Few roots I 'Type:C=Concentrations,D=Depletion.RM=Reduced Matrix.CXS Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2-Location: PI=Pore lining, RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix I Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3` ❑Histosol(Al) ❑ Sandy Redox(S5) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) ❑Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2) ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks 3 ' ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ®Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ❑Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3 ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ' ['Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type:Lithologic discontinuity Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ I Depth(inches):11 Remarks:The soil at this plot site is not the San Juan Series as it does not have any gravel throughout the 23 inches described. ' HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators Primary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) I ❑Surface Water(Al) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water Stained Leaves(B9)(MRLA 1,2, ❑High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A and 4B) ' CI Saturation(A3) ❑ Salt Crust(BI1) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑Water Marks(B1) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ®Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) (C9) C4 I Deposits BS❑Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron Iron De ( ) ®Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑ p ( ) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils(C6) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks(B6) ❑Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl')(LRR A) ®FAC=Neutral Test(D5) ❑Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) ❑Other(Explain in remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ' ❑ Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface(B8) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) '' • Field Observations IISurface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): IWater Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):64 inches Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):64 inches Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ (includes capillary fringe) ' Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks:All horizons were moist to the top of the water table. Wetland Hydrology was check as being present because soon after the sample I plots were described two storm periods delivered sufficient precipitation resulting in ponding to occur in the shallow depression in the slope and flat area and surface flow from the depression area of the wetland. US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 I ' WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast Regions Project/Site:Mauney/Rogerson Marrowstone Parcel 921094026 City/County:/Jefferson Sampling Date:9 Nov 12 I Applicant/Owner:Mauney/Rogerson REV LIV T State: WA Sampling Point:Wetland Plot 6 Investigator(s):W.David Loggy/Loggy Wetlands&Soil Consulting Section,Township,Range:SE1/4,S9,T29N,R1E Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc):Terrace Local relief(concave,convex,none):Flat I Slope(%)0-2 Subregion(LRR):A Lat:N 48.01415 I Long:W-122.67850 I Datum:WGS 84 I Soil Map Unit Name:San Juan Series NWI classification:PEMC&PEMA Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ® No ❑ (If no,explain inl Remarks.) Are vegetation 0, Soil D.or Hydrology significantly disturbed?No Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes ® No ❑ I Are vegetation 0, Soil 0,or Hydrology ❑naturally problematic?No (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Is the Sampled Area ' Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No I=1 Within a Wetland? Yes 0 N ❑ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ Remarks: I VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Trees Stratum (50'r Plot size:) %Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A)3 I 1. 2. Total;Number of dominant Species Across All Strata: (B)3 I 3. Percent of Dominant Species 4 That Are OBL,FCW,or FAC: (A/B) 100 =Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: ' Total%Cover of: Multiply by: Sapling/Shrub Stratum(15'R Plot size) 1.Rosa nutkana 1 No FAC OBL species X 1 = II 2. FACW species X 2= 3. FAC species X 3 = 4. FACU species X 4= ' 5. UPL Species X 5 = 4. Column totals (A) (B) ' 5.. Prevalence index=B/A= =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ' Herb Stratum (5'r Plot size:) ❑ 1.Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 1.Holus lanatus 25 Yes FAC ®2.Dominance Test is>50% 2.Festuca pretense 10 No FACU 3.Juncus effusus 20 Yes FACW ❑3.Prevalence Index is<3.0' ' 4.Agrostis gigantea 25 Yes FAC ❑4.Morphological Adaptations'(Provide 5.Ranunculus repens 15 No FAC supporting data in Remarks or on a separate I6. Equisetum arvense 10 No FAC sheet) 7. ❑5.Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 8. ❑Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' I 9. (Explain) 100% =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:) be present. ' 1. 2, Hydrophytic Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes® No❑ ' %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: I IS Army Corns of Engineers Western Mountains.Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 1 ' SOIL Sampling Point: Wetland Plot 6 Profile Description: (Describe t o the depth needed to document the indicators or confirm the absence of indicators) ' Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loci Textures Remarks 0 to 10 7.5YR 2.5/1 I Weak fine granular/many very fine,fine and few course roots/cw bndy I 10 to 22 N2.5/1 I Moderate medium granular/common fine, medium roots/cw bndy 22 to 48 10YR 5/1 80 10YR 4/6 20 C M vfs Massive parting to single grain/loose moist I 'Type:Concentrations,D=Depletion.RM=Reduced Matrix.CXS�overed or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: Pl=Pore lining, RC=Root Channel,M=Matrix ' Hydric Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRs,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3` El Histosol(Al) ❑Sandy Redox(SS) ❑2 cm Muck(A10) ❑ Histic Epipedon(A2) ❑Stripped Matrix(S6) ❑Red Parent Material(TF2) I ❑Black Histic(A3) ❑Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) ❑Other(Explain in Remarks 3 ❑Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ❑Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) ❑Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) ❑Depleted Matrix(F3) ®Thick Dark Surface(Al2) ❑Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3 ' ❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral(SI) ❑Depleted Dark Surface(F7) Indicators of hydrology must vegetation and ❑Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ❑Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if present): Type:Lithologic discontinuity Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑ I Depth(inches):22 Remarks:The soil at this plot site is not the San Juan Series as it does not have any gravel throughout the 61 inches described. No soil series could be found for the soils in the wetland. They would be classified as Auuultic Hanloxerolls ' HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators IPrimary Indicators(minimum of one required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) ❑ Surface Water(Al) ❑Water-Stained Leaves(B9)(except Water Stained Leaves(B9)(MRLA 1,2, ❑High Water Table(A2) MLRA 1,2,4A,and 4B) 4A and 4B) I ❑ Saturation(A3) ❑Salt Crust(B11) ❑Drainage Patterns(B10) ❑Water Marks(BI) ❑Aquatic Invertebrates(B13) ®Dry-Season Water Table(C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits(B2) ❑Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) ❑Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery ❑Drift Deposits(B3) ❑Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots(C3) (C9) ' ❑Algal Mat or Crust(B4) ❑Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) ®Geomorphic Position(D2) ❑Iron Deposits(B5) ❑Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils(C6) ❑Shallow Aquitard(D3) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks(B6) El Stunted or Stressed Plants(Dl')(LRR A) ❑FAC=Neutral Test(D5) ' ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) El Other(Explain in remarks) ❑Raised Ant Mounds(D6)(LRR A) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface(B8) ❑Frost-Heave Hummocks(D7) ' Field Observations Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth(inches): IWater Table Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):44 Saturation Present? Yes ® No ❑ Depth(inches):44 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ® No ❑ I (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: I Remarks: Wetland Hydrology was check as being present because soon after the sample plots were described two storm periods delivered sufficient precipitation resulting in ponding to occur in the shallow depression in the slope and flat area and surface flow from the depression area of the wetland. ' US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys and Coast—Version 2.0 APPENDIX B IWETLAND RATING SHEETS 1 1 1 1 1 Wetland name or number Mauney Wetland WETLAND RATING FORM-WESTERN WASHINGTON Version 2-Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users t Name of wetland(if known): Mauney Wetland Date of site visit:11-90 Nov 12 W.David Loggy I Loggy Soil& Rated by Wetland Consulting Trained by Ecology? YesX No Date of training18 Jun 08 ' SEC: 9 TWNSHP:29N RNGE: IE Is SIT/R in Appendix D? Yes No X Map of wetland unit:Figure_ Estimated size ' SUMMARY OF RATING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland ' I II III X IV_ Score for Water Quality Functions 14 ' Category I=Score>=70 Category II=Score 51-69 Score for Hydrologic Functions 6 Category III=Score 30 50 Score for Habitat Functions 15 Category IV=Score<30 TOTAL score for Functions 35 Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland ' I II_ Does not Apply X Final Category(choose the"highest"category from above) III Summary of basic information about the wetland unit Wetland Unit has Special Wetland HGM Class ' Characteristics used for Rating Estuarine Depressions! X Natural Heritage Wetland Riverine Bog Lake-fringe ' Mature Forest Slope Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal Lagoon Freshwater Tidal Interdunal ' None of the above Check if unit has multiple El HGM classes present Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 1 August 2004 ' version 2 1 ' Wetland name or number Mauney Wetland Does the wetland unit being rated meet any of the criteria below? ' If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland. Check List for Wetlands That May Need Additional Protection YES NO (in addition to the protection recommended for its category) SP1.Has the wetland unit been documented as a habitat for any hederally listed Threatened or Endangered animal or plant species(T/E species)? For the purposes of this rating system."documented"means the wetland is on the X ' appropriate state or federal database. SP2.Has the wetland unit been documented as habitat for any State listed Threatened or Endangered animal species? For the purposes of this rating system,"documented"means the wetland is on the X appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are categorized as Category I Natural Heritage Wetlands(see p. 19 of data form). SP3. Does the wetland unit contain individuals of Priority species listed by the WDFW for the state? X SP4. Does the wetland unit have a local significance in addition to its functions? For example,the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master X Program,the Critical Areas Ordinance,or in a local management plan as having special significance. ' To complete the next part of the data sheet you will need to determine the Hvdrogeomorphlc Class of the wetland being rated. ' The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic Class of a wetland can be determined using the key below. Seep.24 for more detailed instructions on classifying wetlands. • t ' Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington 2 August 2004 Version 2 1 ' Classification of Vegetated Wetlands for Western Washington Wetland Name: Mauney Wetland Date: 19 Nov 12 ' 1.Are the water levels in the wetland usually controlled by tides(i.e. except during floods)? NO—go to 2 YES—d,c»ctlund class is Tidal F.:nge If yes,is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt(parts per thousand)? YES—Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO—Saltwater Tidal Fringe(Estuarine) ' If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wetland. Wetlands that were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were categorized separately in the earlier editions,and this separation is being kept in this revision. To maintain consistency between editions,the term"Estuarine"wetland is kept. t Please note,however,that the characteristics that define Category I and II estuarine wetlands have changed(see p. ). 2.Is the topography within the wetland flat and precipitation is only source(>90%)of water to it. NO—go to 3 YES The wetl, nd class it late-- ' If your wetland can be classified as a"Flats"wetland,use the form for Depressional wetlands. ' 3. Does the wetland meet both of the following criteria? The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of open water(without any vegetation on the surface)where at least 20 acres(8 ha)are permanently inundated (ponded or flooded); t _At least 30%of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft(2 m)? NO—goto4 . 4.Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria? ' x The wetland is on a slope(slope can be very gradual), The water flows through the wetland in one direction(unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface,as sheetflow,or in a swale without distinct ' banks. x The water leaves the wetland without being impounded? NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type ofwedands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks(depressions are usually ' <3ft diameter and less than I foot deep). NO-go to 5 YES The wets sd-^cl i,s-is-Siope 5.Is the wetland in a valley,or stream channel,where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from ' that stream or river? The flooding should occur at least once every two years,on the average,to answer"yes." The wetland can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding. NO-go to 6 YE The__._ and _t...,., i_ n ._ —_ Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 3 August 2004 1 I I ' Mauney Wetland 6. Is the wetland in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface,at I some time of the year. This means that any outlet. i f present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. NO—goto7 I 7.Is the wetland located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no stream or river running through it and providing water. The wetland seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched,but has no obvious natural outlet. NO—go to 8 YEf w Tc etland elate i Depr a al ton 111 8.Your wetland seems to be difficult to classify. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a rverine floodplain,or a small stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of I flooding along its sides. Sometimes we find characteristics of several different hydrogeomorphic classes within one wetland boundary. Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10%or more of the total area of the wetland being rated. If the area of the second class is less than 10%classify the wetland using the first class. • 1 HGM Classes Within a Delineated Wetland Boundary Class to Use in Rating Slope+Riverine Riverine Slope+Depressional Depressional I Slope+Lake-fringe Lake-fringe Depressional+Riverine along stream within boundary Depressional Depressional+Lake-fringe Depressional I Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland Treat as ESTUARINE under wetlands with special characteristics I If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland,or you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary,classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. I I I IWetland Rating Form—western Washington 4 August 2004 I I ' Wetland name or number Mauney Wetland D Depressional and Flats Wetlands Points I WATER QUALITY FUNCTIONS - Indicators that the wetland unit functions to wit''"e improve water quality °=tee D D 1.Does the wetland unit have the potential to improve water quality? (see p.38) D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland: Figure_ I D Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it(no outlet) points=3 Unit has an intenniaently flowing,OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points=2 Unit has an unconstricted,or slightly constricted,surface outlet (permanently flawing)points=1 Unit is a"flat"depression(Q.7 on key),or in the Flats class,with permanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch points=I (if ditch is not permanently flowing treat anti as"intennittentlyflowing") 2 Provide photo or drawing S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface(or duff layer)is clay or organic (use h'RCIS definitions) ' ' D YES points=4 U NO points=0 D 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation(emergent,shrub,and/or forest Cowardin class)Figure 1 D Wetland has persistent,ungrazed,vegetation> 95%of area points=5 Wetland has persistent,ungrazed,vegetation>=1/2 of area points=3 I Wetland has persistent,ungrazed vegetation>=1/10 of area points=1 Wetland has persistent,ungrazed vegetation<1/10 of area points=0 3 Map of Cowardin vegetation classes • D1.4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation. Figure D This is the area of the wetland unit that is ponded for at least 2 months,but dries out I sometime during the year. Do not count the area that is permanently ponded. Estimate area as the average condition.5 out of 10 yrs. Area seasonally ponded is>'A total area of wetland points=4 Area seasonally ponded is>Vu total area of wetland points=2 I Area seasonally ponded is<'VI total area of'wetland points=0 2 Map of Hydroperiods D Total for D 1 Add the points in the boxes above 1 7 1 • D D 2.Does the wetland unit have the oonortunity to improve water quality? (seep 44) I Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams,lakes or groundwater downgradient from the wetland.Note which of the following conditions provide the sources of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants coming from several sources,but any single source would qualify as opportunity. I - Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft — Untreated stormwater discharges to wetland X Tilled fields or orchards within 150 ft of wetland — A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas,residential areas, I farmed fields,roads.or clear-cut logging — Residential,urban areas,golf courses arc within 150 ft of wetland multiplier — Wetland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen — Other 2 YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is I I D TOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from DI by D2 14 Add score to table on p. 1 Wetland Rating Form–Western Washington 5 August 2004 IVersion 2 I I I I 1 I I ' Wetland name or number Mauney Wetland D Depressional and Flats Wetlands Points HYDROLOGIC FUNCTIONS - Indicators that the wetland unit functions to (only t°""e I reduce flooding and stream degradation Per b°'') D 3.Does the wetland unit have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion? (see p.46) D D 3.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland unit Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it(no outlet) points=4 I Unit has an intermittently flowing,OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points=2 Unit is a"flat"depression(Q.7 on key),or in the Flats class,with permanent surface outflow and no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch points=I (ifditch is not permanentlyflowing treat writ as"intermittently flowing") 2 ' Unit has an unconstricted,or slightly constricted,surface outlet (permanently flowing) points=0 D D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet.For units with no outlet measure from the surface of permanent water or deepest part(i(th y). Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points=7 I The wetland is a"headwater"wetland" points=5 Marks of ponding between 2 ft to<3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points=5 Marks are at least 0.5 ft to<2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points=3 Unit is flat(yes to Q.2 or Q.7 on key)but has small depressions on the surface that trap water points=I I Marks of ponding less than 0.5 ft points=0 D D 3.3 Contribution of wetland unit to storage in the watershed Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland to the area of the wetland unit itself. , I The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of unit points=5 The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area of the unit points=3 The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit points=0 3 Entire unit is in the FLA'T'S class points=5 D Total for D 3 Add the points in the boxes above 1 6 I I - r..... D D 4.Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion? (seep.49) Answer YES if the unit is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage,or reduction in water velocity,it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic resources from flooding or excessive and/or erosive flows. Answer NO if the water I coming into the wetland is controlled by a structure such as flood gate,tide gate,flap valve,reservoir etc.OR you estimate that more than,90%of the water in the wetland is from groundwater in areas where damaging groundwater flooding does not occur. Note which of the following indicators of opportunity apply. I - Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems — Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems — Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might otherwise flow into a river or stream that has flooding problems multiplier I — Other YES multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 1 D TOTAL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4 Add score to table on p.I 6 I Wetland Rating Form-Western Washington 6 August 2004 ' Version 2 I I I I I I Wetland name or number auney Wetland I These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. Points I way HABITAT FUNCTIONS-Indicators that unit functions to provide important habitat � score H 1.Does the wetland unit have the potential to provide habitat for many species? H 1.1 Vegetation structure(seep. 72) Figure I Check the types of vegetation classes present(as defined by Cowardin)-Size threshold for each class is 1/2 acre or more than 10%of the area if unit is smaller than 2.5 acres. _Aquatic bed X Emergent plants _Scrub/shrub(areas where shrubs have>30%cover) ' _Forested(areas where trees have>30%cover) if the unit has a forested class check if _The forested class has 3 out of 5 strata(canopy,sub-canopy,shrubs,herbaceous, moss/gmund-cover)that each cover 20%within the forested polygon I Add the number of vegetation structures that qualify. If you have: 4 structures or more points=4 Map of CowaMin vegetation Gasses 3 structures points=2 2 structures points=1 0 1 structure points=0 I H 1.2.Hydroperiods(seep.73) Figure_ Check the types of water regimes(hydroperiods)present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10%of the wetland or Y,acre to count.(see text for descriptions of hydroperiods) I _Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present points=3 X Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present points=2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present point=1 X Saturated only I type present points=0 _Permanently flowing stream or river in,or adjacent to,the wetland I X Seasonally flowing stream in,or adjacent to,the wetland Lake-fringe wetland=2 points 2 _Freshwater tidal wetland=2 points Map of hydroperiods H 1.3.Richness of Plant Specieg(seep. 75) I Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least l0 ftz. (dterent patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold) You do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Milfoil,reed canarygrass,purple loosesirife, Canadian Thistle If you counted: >19 species points=2 I List species below if you want to: 5-19 species points=1 <5 species points=0 1 I 1 ' Total for page 3 Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington 13 August 2004 IVersion 2 I I I Wetland name or number Mauney Wetland H 1.4.Interspersion of habitats(seep.76) Figure_ Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation classes(described in H 1.1),or the classes and unvegetated areas(can include open water or mudflats)is high,medium,low,or none. 1 C� O Etia None=0 points Low=1 point Moderate=2 points MA [riparian braided channels] High =3 points t NOTE:If you have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water a the rating is always"high`. Use map of Cowardin vegetation classes 11 1.5.Special Habitat Features:(seep. 77) Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the ' number of points you put into the next column. _Large.downed,woody debris within the wetland(>4in.diameter and 6 ft long). _Standing snags(diameter at the bottom>4 inches)in the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft(2m)and/or overhanging vegetation extends at ' ^ least 3.3 ft(I m)over a stream(or ditch)in,or contiguous with the unit,for at least 33 ft (I0m) _Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30degree slope)OR signs of recent beaver activity are present(cut shrubs or trees that have not yet turned grey/brown) ' X At least'/.acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches arc present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated.(structures for egg-laying by amphibians) X Invasive plants cover less than 25%of the wetland area ineach stratum of plants NOTE:The 20%staled in early printings of the mamial on page 78 is an error. 2 ' H 1.TOTAL Score- potential for providing habitat 5 1 Add the scores from H1.1,111.2,111.3, 111.4,111.5 Comments 1 1 Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington 14 August 2004 Version 2 1 I I Wetland name or number Mauney Wetland I H 2.Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species? ' H2.1 Buffers (seep.80) Figure_ Choose the description that hest represents condition of buffer of wetland unit.The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating.See text for definition of "undisturbed" ' 100 m(330ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water >95% of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of'buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no-grazing,no landscaping,no daily human use) Points=5 — 100 m(330 ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water > 50% circumference. Points=4 I — 50 m(I70ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water>95% circumference. Points=4 — 100 m(33011)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water>25% circumference,. Points=3 — 50 m(17011)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water for> 50%circumference. Points=3 If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above — No paved areas(except paved trails)or buildings within 25 m(80ft)of wetland>95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing,or lawns are OK. Points=2 I — No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for>50%circumference. Light to moderate grazing,or lawns are OK. Points=2 — Heavy grazing in buffer. Points=1 — Vegetated buffers are<2m wide(6.611)for more than 95%of the circumference(e.g.tilled ' I fields,paving,basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points=0. — Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points=I 5 Aerial photo showing buffers H 2.2 Corridors and Connections(see p.81) II 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor I (either riparian or upland)that is at least 150 ft wide,has at least 30%cover of shrubs,forest or native undisturbed prairie,that connects to estuaries,other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors,heavily used gravel roods,paved roads,are considered breaks in the corridor). I YES=4points (go to12.3) NO=go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland)that is at least 5011 wide,has at least 30%cover of shrubs or • forest,and connects to estuaries,other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake-fringe wetland,if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in I the question above? YES=2 points (go to 112.3) NO=H 2.2.3 1f 2.2.3 Is the wetland: within 5 mi(8km)of a brackish or salt water estuary OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasture(>40 acres)OR I within I mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? YES=1 point NO=0 points 1 Total for page 6 I Wetland Rating Form–Western Washington 15 August 2004 IVersion 2 I I I I I Wetland name or number Mauney Wetland 1-12.3 Near or adjacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW(see new and complete I descriptions of WDFW priority habitats,and the counties in which they can be found,in the PHS report http✓/wdfw.wa_pov/hab/phslisthtm) Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft(100m)of the wetland unit?NOTE:the connections do not have to be relatively undisturbed I =Aspen Stands:Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.4 ha(1 acre). Biodiversity Areas and Corridors:Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 152). _Herbaceous Balds:Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. I _Old-growth/Mature forests:(Old-growth west of Cascade crest)Stands of at least 2 tree species,forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings;with at least 20 trees/ha(8 trees/acre)>81 cm(32 in)dbh or>200 years of age. (Mature forests) Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm(21 in)dbh;crown cover may be less that 100%; I crown cover may be less that 100%;decay,decadence,numbers of snags,and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth;80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where I canopy coverage of the oak component is important(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158). Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of I both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. Westside Prairies: Herbaceous,non-forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie(full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161). _Instream:The combination of physical,biological,and chemical processes and conditions I that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. X Nearshore:Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore,and Puget Sound Nearshore.(full descriptions of habitats and the I definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report:pp. 167-169 and glossary in Appendix A). Caves:A naturally occurring cavity,recess,void,or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils,rock,ice,or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a I human. _Cliffs:Greater than 7.6 m(25 ft)high and occurring below 5000 ft. _Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15-2.0 m(0.5-6.5 ft), composed of basalt,andesite,and/or sedimentary rock,including riprap slides and mine ' tailings.May be associated with cliffs. Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife.Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of>51 cm(20 in)in western Washington and are>2 m(6.5 ft)in I height. Priority logs are>30 cm(12 in)in diameter at the largest end,and>6 m(20 ft) long. If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats=4 points I If wetland has 2 priority habitats=3 points If wetland has I priority habitat=1 point No habitats=0 points Note:All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list. Nearby wetlands are addressed in question H 2.4) I IWetland Rating Form—western Washington 16 August 2004 version 2 Updated with new WDFW definitions Oct.2008 I I I I ' Wetland name or number Mauney Wetland H 2.4 Wetland Landscape(choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland that best fits)(seep.84) I There are at least 3 other wetlands within'A mile,and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed(light grazing between wetlands OK,as is lake shore with some boating,but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads,fill,fields,or other development. points=5 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe I wetlands within%,mile points=5 There are at least 3 other wetlands within'A mile,BUT the connections between them are disturbed points=3 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe I wetland within''A mile points=3 There is at least I wetland within h mile. points=2 There are no wetlands within'/:mile. points=0 3 H 2.TOTAL Score- opportunity for providing habitat f 1 I Add the scores from 112.1,112.2,112.3,H2.4 1 _ 10 TOTAL for H 1 from page 14 5 ' Total Score for Habitat Functions -add the points for H 1,H 2 and record the result on p 15 . 1 I I I • I I I Wetland Rating Form-Western Washington 17 August 2004 ' Version 2 1 I I 1 Wetland name ornwnbcr MaUneyWetland CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS ' Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described below and circle the appropriate answers and Category. ' Wetland Type Category Check off any criteria that apply to the wetland. Circle the Category when the appropriate criteria are met. SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands(seep.86) ' Does the wetland unit meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? — The dominant water regime is tidal, — Vegetated,and — With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt. ' YES= Go to SC 1.1 NO X SC 1.1 Is the wetland unit within a National Wildlife Refuge,National Park, National Estuary Reserve,Natural Area Preserve,State Park or Educational, Cat.I Environmental,or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? ' YES=Category I NO go to SC 1.2 SC 1.2 Is the wetland unit at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? YES=Category I NO=Category II Cat.I ' -The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking,ditching,filling, Cat.11 cultivation,grazing,and has less than 10%cover of non-native plant species. If the non-native Spartina spp.are the only species that cover more than 10%of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual Dual ' rating(I/I1). The area of Spartina would be rated a Category II while the rating relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a Inl Category I. Do not,however,exclude the area of Spartina in determining the size threshold of I acre. —At least'/.of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 It buffer of ' shrub,forest,or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. —The wetland has at least 2 of the following feytures:tidal channels, depressions with open water,or contiguous freshwater wetlands. 1 1 Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington 18 August 2004 Version 2 t Wetland name or number Mauney Wetland SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands (seep.87) t Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage Cat.[ Program/DNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support state Threatened,Endangered,or Sensitive plant species. SC 2.1 Is the wetland unit being rated in a Seetion/Township/Range that contains a t Natural Heritage wetland? (this question is used to screen out most sites before you need to contact WNHP/DNR) SLUR information from Appendix D or accessed from WNIIPR)NR web site YES —contact WNHP/DNR(see p.79)and go to SC 2.2 NO X SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species? YES=Category I NO not a Heritage Wetland ' SC 3.0 Bogs (seep.87) Does the wetland unit(or any part of the unit)meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs?Use the key below to identifii if the wetland is a bog. If you ' answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. I. Does the unit have organic soil horizons(i.e.layers of organic soil),either peats or mucks,that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the soil profile?(See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils)?Yes= ' go to Q.3 No -go to Q.2 2. Does the unit have organic soils,either peats or mucks that are less than 16 inches deep over bedrock,or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash,or that are floating on a lake or pond? ' Ys ,t..Q.3 No-Is not a bog for purpose of rating 3. Does the unit have more than 70%cover of mosses at ground level,AND other plants,if present,consist of the`bog"species listed in Table 3 as a significant component of the vegetation(more than 30%of the total shrub and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)? Yes—Is a bog for purpose of rating No- go to Q.4 NOTE:If you are uncertain about the extent-of mosses in the understory ' you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16"deep. If the p11 is less than 5.0 and the "bog"plant species in Table 3 are present,the wetland is a bog. 3. Is the unit forested(>30%cover)with sitka spruce,subalpine fir,western ' red cedar,western hemlock,lodgepole pine,quaking aspen,Englemann's spruce,or western white pine,WITH any of the species(or combination of species)on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component of the ground cover(>30%coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover)? 4. YES= Category I No Is not a bog for purpose of rating Cat I Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington 19 August 2004 Version 2 I I wetland name or number Mauney Wetland 1 ' SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands(seep.90) Does the wetland unit have at least I acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer yes you will.still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. — Old-growth forests:(west of Cascade crest)Stands of at least two tree species, ' forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings;with at least 8 trees/acre(20 trees/hectare)that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height(dbh)of 32 inches(81 cm)or more. ' NOTE:The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests. Two-hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh because their growth rates are often slower. The DEW criterion is and"OR" so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter. ' - Mature forests:(west of the Cascade Crest)Stands where the largest trees are 80-200 years old OR have average diameters(dbh)exceeding 21 inches (53cm);crown cover may be less that 100%;decay,decadence,numbers of snags,and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that tound ' in old-growth. YES= Category I NO X not a forested wetland with special characteristics Cat.I SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons(seep. 91) ' Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? — The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks,gravel banks, shingle,or,less frequently,rocks ' —The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is saline or brackish(>0.5 ppt)during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon(needs to be measured near the bottom) YES=Go to SC 5.1 NO X not a wetland in a coastal lagoon ' SC 5.1 Does the wetland meets all of the following three conditions? —The wetland is relatively undisturbed(has no diking,ditching,filling, cultivation,grazing),and has less than 20%cover of invasive plant species(see list of invasive species on p.74). ' —At least%of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub,forest,or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland. Cat.I —The wetland is larger than 1/10 acre(4350 square feet) YES=Category I NO=Category 1I Cat.ii Wetland Rating Form-Western Washington 20 August 2004 ' Version 2 II 1 Wetland name or number Mauney Wetland SC 6.0 luterdunal Wetlands (seep. 93) U Is the wetland unit west of the 1889 line(also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? YES-go to SC 6.1 NO X not an interdunal wetland for rating If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its ' functions. In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: • Long Beach Peninsula-lands west of SR 103 • Grayland-Westport-lands west of SR 105 ' • Ocean Shores-Copalis-lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 11 SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger,or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is once acre or larger? YES=Category II NO—go to SC 6.2 Cat.11 SC 6.2 Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 acre,or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and 1 acre? YES=Category III Cat.ll l Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics ' Choose the "highest"rating if wetland falls into several categories,and record on P. 1. If you answered NO for all types enter"Not Applicable"on p.1 1 i Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington 21 August 2004 Version 2 1 t APPENDIX C ' DRAWINGS AND MAPS 1 1 MLA/12-68 SHORTRPLAT oR MA LANE Y/R 0 GER S ON TRUST IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., 4 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON I z. 9 � m N „4, OLLIRTER CORNER e° xi FOUND 4"x 4"CONCRETE ,t MON IN ALUMINUM CASE N (4/09/04) I ' C` — — _MOEN GOAD — CENTER OF SECTION 9 FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT IN NORTH LINE OF g N ALUMINUM CASE. (7/23/09) THE SE 1/4 I op�pi ' Nz I FOUND / i/2'BRASS CAP WITH PUNCH QQiS W i IN MONUMENT WELL. (1/23/09) I b MONUMENT LIES 579•0 2.79' FROM TRUE 1/16714 CORNER Ileil W � 7MW 153 75 l7 1 J TES 2/40/72. S8752'44"E SCALE NV FEET f't 1+a��!N�i Y�1�9t••:C l J i�_/ 7302.3 ' 479.30' 883.02' DISNEY ROAD O N O ' O S P2 N DRAIFMGE DITCH WETLAND AREA: o APPS'�� LOT 1: 41,159 SF(0.94 ACRE) CC 0 0.12 ACRES. NORTH I `rfm \ SOUTH OF ROAD. ro LOT 3: 92,996 76.162 SF(0.37 ACRE) ' Q O�T LOT �. LOT 3 A 41 I `� TOTAL WETLAND AREA=3.45 ACRES v u, G `�� 437507 sq. R. YO FACE 40.a•G w V_O�L.2 Ssib 109 1" 10.04 ones • H2O - SHALLOW WATER ' SUR'�" \ O N MEASURING SITE axe or:� ` �� APN g21�w26 ORA/NACE DITCH ',-9 t 4, S - WETLAND SAMPLE PLOT TLS�p/12' LOr 2 cP.T ® UP - UPLAND SAMPLE POINT «', 5£PNC maim 485,853 sq. 1t.o ® �� 17.75 acres 13' NORM ENO _ , CALCULATED POSITION OF A REBAR N,MICE ENE 4... ® /� <_� WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED: I-": 1 A WOOD PLS 23971'PER VOL I / v�7,'m.ANA aW y = 33.50. / J7 OF SURVEYS. PAGE 109. / \ exrsnNC AC4fAE A901 'a ,` ` \ \ SEPOJ-ILY s.1. RAGA[ 1'� �i / LINE TABLE SBTSJ J2EIExNBNC KU W.;.1�� �`=/ LINE BEARING LENGTH 15.00'\\ ;��/ LOT 7 .`• ,• ,�7 /V11' L/J 11 053'02'42""E 79.47'seem 7. C 581,569 sq. ft. '.-�. --` I L2 1418'38 J9E 69.07' ' EOGE Of ASM1K7 r. ■ 73.35 ones \ i== ,/"A L3 1,15.3"78.04"E 98.11' Nola PER F.[ln \ N .` ,` C ,V�0 L4 N50'3071 E 66.30' nLS 2/af/r2 / �l l= If DRA A y L5 N50'30 J1 E 96.05' ® I 0 1 -- i DITCH ' ‘.9 1.6 NST55'SO E 62.53' I 1451'4070 E 93.82' ill \\ 46. V . / V5 ,�p'L IB N49.07'14E 62.12' ' `- n"`t_t 1.9 , N5P10T5'E 137.84' \ % //b1 „l1<<0„5' °U LID 1454'l677E 52.97' �p 6” 1'" LI I N50'44'03 E 92,70' +a V6 �VMµpd O .C( �N L I2 N4848'S2'E 74.63' 0 1 V9 606e41°:4‘ QE,° 1�.L L73 N5I'40'48 E 29.57' ' �R PAM LEGEND; QUARTER CALCULATED POSITION Vj E • DENOTES FOUND 5/B'REFM WITH PLASTIC SURVEY CAP STAMPED:srAms yIRLcluRe PER VOL. 7 OF SURVEYS. A WOOD 23911' (1/23/09) 91 PAGE 707' j/� L � A DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND AND ACCEPTED AS NOTED. (1/23/09) 547.51' gg 76 58751'05"E / /. V, Ap DENOTES TEST PIT LOCATION PER JSF ENGINEERING(4/24/72) ' ' a t, :z'S1 DENOTES EYISTING GRAVEL DRIVEWAY PER FIELD TIES 1/23/09. ® DENOTES 20' WIDE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY PER DEED VICINITY MAP RECORDED UNDER AFN 459620. NO SCALE �� N j DENOTES WETLAND PER FIELD TIES 11/28/12. A "' IS NOT E Fj 7. TH5 SURVEY WAS PERFORMED BY FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS USING A 5 til SECOND TOPCON G15-235W TOTAL STATION AND s1LLL TAPE.' �� 2. SEE EYSIS OF BEARING COB S OF -SUBDIVISION MARCH DATA SEE VOL 7 AL OF SURVEYS, PAGE 101, RECORDS DF JLETENIED COUNTY, WASHINGTON ALSO SEE UNRECORDED SURVEY BY J.T. LAY DATED MARCH , WA HI FILE WLS THE 4 1 Lill is �� MERANSOR COUNTY AND OFFICE 3. WERANO REPORT ANO DELINEATION BY SOGGY SOIL AND WETLAND CONSULTING. Al B.M Q� 4. RESERVE AREA FOR DRA/NFIELD SHOWN HEREON BY JSF ENGINEERING INC. �y H71E0 'WASTEWATER SYSTEM PUN'AND DATED 71/26/72. j° - NOVEMBER 29, 2012 SHEET 1 OF 1 �,a fp`;�``12 f PILAIIIIL �� N.T.S / P.O.Boa 3199 MAK'\\;���� 935 x SIB Aw. File ��U X LAND SURVEYING LAND s 0)6 w+ 9ea9z ' °4 NAPPING OM Ae,-,,r., 4r DEVELOPIAENT CONSULTING FAX 103-_3 3 SOBJECT �= CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT '1 OW sa,-= DRAWN Al: xe PROPERTY 0 9(29N-1E) 5EAE: alE2909—NAUIIEY_5P_EASE-0220,2 'rte_ I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Michelle Farfan From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 2:14 PM To: 'Scot Clark' Cc: 'Terry McHugh' Subject: Mauney Short Plat Hi Scot: Terry dropped off the eight revised full size copies and a reduced 81/2" x 11". I need page 2 with the existing legal description, signature blocks, etc. I am waiting for the updated wetland delineation to be submitted,but once received would be ready to notice the application with SEPA but would need page 2 of 2 for my mail out. Thanks. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner,FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @cojefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-9473 (fax) All voice messages and a-mails received by Jefferson County maY be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56RCW. Please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1,2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am - 4:3o pm Monday to Thursday and closed on'Fridays. i MLA/I2-68 + SHORT PREL/MIPLYI F,, A UNE Y/R O G ER S ON TR US T �L IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M., pg 4 JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON -- , 2 9 �g}w m h QUARTER CORNER A , A h q rn FOUND 4"r 4'CONCRETE [EC [E l n pN b LION IN ALUMINUM CASE D v t g N (4/09/04) C1 - MOEN ROAD _ CENTER OF SECTION 9 OF 1 T EC - 3 2012 FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT IN NORTH LINE ry ALUMINUM CASE. (1/23/09) ME SE 7/4 o E' V N 0,,,2 33 �W g IM FOUND 1 !/2"BRASS CAP WITH PUNCH IEFFERS�N COUNTY x,11 IN MONUMENT WELL. (7/23/09) DEPT.OF COMM TTY DEVELOPMENT MONUMENT(7/ 509'31'11V, 771 C RIVER 279' FROM TRUE 1/16TH CORNER W EMS OF GRAM. 150 75 0 150 8010 PER F1ELL S8T52'44E DES 2/20/73. SCALE IN FEET �..�_-i�yc is 47930'�'u••:—P;-Zii�c%lci f.�c:�883.02" -c'_cJ_I_r 9/ I/ /i Lt///l�dJ/ I -R, DISNEY ROAD �� 0 g� 15' O "°2 DRAINAGE DITCH ry WETLAND AREA: O I Ip AP X.. AREA LOT 1: 41,159 SF(0.94 ACRE). R YC II 0.12 ACRES. NORTH pp�q,, T N�� \ SOUTH WETLAND p� '4- LOT 3: 92,996 6,9162 SF(0.37 ACRE) 2 112, LOT J S Gov T L OF �L. 437,507 sp. It. 46. 7 b TOTAL WETLAND AREA=3.45 ACRES a0 E£ACE 0.9'E. 10.04 acres wes `per VG• j p9 \ "NI • H2O - SHALLOW WA SITE `p 5U E6 93026 ■ w A MEASURING SITE RO10 PERK M20 e APN 9 0 S - WETLAND SAMPLE PLOT DES 2/10/72. LOT 2 UP J DRAINAGE DITCH ; UP - UPLAND SAMPLE POINT 115 s9. N. \ v a 11.15 acre., ■\ �. �, �. 'o CALCULATED POSITION OF A REBAR NORM ENO I ",W ® L \ 0.. T\ WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED: ELECIR,C FENCE �, / �yi \ROPAYE TAN Nom, ,,� $�,i il. WOOD PLS 239117 PER VOL. / )' Ex131WC RLSER/E,wu a, \ \ 13.50' / Jf OF SURVEYS, PACE 709. ( /ID7AC• SEPoJ-63 N. \ \ \ \ \ I 58753'32E1 f E 5 NEtt � '� `I LINE TABLE 15.00'\ "P� (N()TAD) � '� Y / / LINE BEARING LENGTH � 581,569 sq. It. �y �4 \M1 L/J LI N5J'01'41E 79.47' 6 13.36 acres \-' \ \ \ \ TOP OF \1 L2 N48'J9 J9 E 69.07' E� FIELD \I h ., ' �'∎�� ` SLOPE 1/\' GJ N5J'18'04 E 9871' TIES 2/20/71. a / �\ ti` C\p LINE OF L4 N5070'J1E 66.36' '� Q / EXISTING ziG) \ `R4\ I DRAINAGE VEGETATION L5 N50%30'317 96.05' F-� ® 1 -Nw,, \ $ I DITCH b9 L6 N54'S5'SOE 62.53' D,avrzOxm I t l \v\\ ti I / r L7 N5 740307E , 93.82' LF \ $\ / \=� z V0 1401 L8 N49'07'14 7E' 62.72' YY � '�I , lE� L9 N57'I0'25 f 137.84" ', \ �, I pN 1g Lf0 N54'76'37"E 5297" BARBED h �\, ` tr �6 �p Ep 1N 51��C' L I1 N50'44'03E 92.70' MIRE FENCE fl i i \ \' S ).'�ENd .('( L12 N48'4852'E 74.63' L. pb Pit LIJ N5740'48E 29.57' h QUARTER CORNER , \'4 r P� 1 LEGEND: CALCULATED POSITION EXISTING 5 ("LISTING • DENOTES FOUND 5/8"REBAR WITH PLASTIC SURVEY CAP STAMPED: PER VOL. 7 OF SURVEYS, STRUCNRE \' MARS A. WOOD 23911" (1/1.3/09) 91 PAGE IOC 10Q/1.ti LINE OF • DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND AND ACCEPTED AS NOTED. (7/23/09) 54751' 71 VEGETATION 16 S875105E 8 DENOTES TEST PIT LOCATION PER JSF ENGINEERING (4/24/12) a 1,,''I':'1 DENOTES EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVEWAY PER FIELD TIES 7/23/09. ® DENOTES 20' WIDE EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY PER DEED VICINITY MAP �� RECORDED UNDER AFN 459620. NO SCALE ii r�' DENOTES WETLAND PER FIELD TIES 17/28/12. APPROVED BY JEFFERSON COUNTY it A I 1. SECOND WAS PERFORMED BY FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS USING A 5 111 id SECOND TOPCON GTS-235W TOTAL STATION AND STEEL TAPE. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DATE 2. FOR BASIS OF BEARING AND SECTION SUBOMSION DATA. SEE VOL. 7 OF DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR SURVEYS, PAGE 101, RECORDS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ALSO SEE UNRECORDED SURVEY BY J.T. LAY DATED MARCH 1948 ON FILE WITH THE .F �� ti JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE. E �,,pp"� Y 3. WETLAND REPORT AND DELINEATION BY LOGGY SOIL AND WETLAND CONSULTING. SSA,d aASI .410. O 4. RESERVE AREA FOR DRAINFIELO SHOWN HEREON BY JSF ENGINEERING INC. TITLED 'WASTEWATER SYSTEM PLAN"AND DATED 11/26/12. NOVEMBER 29, 2012 SHEET 1 OF 1 N.T.S. j .R19LLPL� 0 93S Pe.1799 P CI.�_ l.US° IfirikiP.42‘ :i �> 9,5 Sin Awe.8382 LAND SURVEYING *r I,�� (370) I_ I1 Q4 MAPPING (360)571-ale, MI SUBJECT ��`" X CONSTRRUCIION CONSULTING MANAGEMENT OFFICE (885)AN-2M1 DRAM Br: MS PROPERTY 6 9 29N-1E L �- \ KR* 01E2909-MAUNEY-SP--BASE-021012 1 v MLA/11-68 SHORTRPLLI I 11 1 A Ul V / !' Y/R O GE'R S ON TR US T ELF" IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M,, p� JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON DESCRIPTION: APPROVALS: GOVERNMENT LOT 1, IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH. RANGE I EAST, W.M., EXCEPT THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR A PUBLIC ROAD GRANTED DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CERTIFICATE: TO J FERSON COUNTY OVER THE WEST 15 FEET IF THE NORTH 660 FEE F STAID GOVERNMENT LOT 7, AS CONVEYED BY DEED RECORDED I HEREBY CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT THIS FINAL R AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 75494, IN VOLUME I OF ROAD WAIVERS. PLAT IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CERTIFICATE OF IMPROVEMENTS ISSUED PACE 548, RECORDS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON PURSUANT TO THE JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE AND IS CONSISTENT WITH ALL APPLICABLE COUNTY IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS IN FORCE ON THE DATE OF PRELIMINARY PUT APPROVAL, THIS DAY OF , 2012. NOTICE TO POTENTIAL PURCHASERS: 1. THE LOTS, PARCELS OR TRACTS CONTAINED WITHIN 17415 SUBDIVISION WERE APPROVED BASED ON DESIGN STANDARDS AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME DIRECTOR. JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OF FINAL APPROVAL. ON51TE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS SHALL MEET DESIGN STANDARDS AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION FOR A SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT. PURCHASER SHOULD CONTACT THE JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ENvIRONATENTAL HEALTH FOR APPLICATIONS. ANY REMOVAL OF ORT MAJOR�DISTURBANCE OF SOIL ING WITHIN THE ADMINISTRATOR'S CERTIFICATE PROPOSED DRAINFIELD AREAS WY CREATE SITE CONDITIONS THAT ARE UNACCEPTABLE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS. I HEREBY CERTIFY ON THIS_DAY OF . 2012. THAT THIS 2. ANY FURTHER SUBDIVISION OF THE LOTS WITHIN THIS PUT WILL BE SUBJECT TO 174E FINAL PUT 15 IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE 111TH THE PRELIMINARY PUT AND DENSITIES PERMITTED IN THE JEFFERSON COUNTY ORDINANCES AND CODES IN EFFECT AT ANY CONDITIONS ATTACHED THERETO, WHICH PRELIMINARY PUT WAS APPROVED TIME OF SUCH APPLICATION. THESE LOTS MAY OR MAY NOT BE FURTHER SUBDIVIDED IN BY JEFFERSON COUNTY ON THE _ DAY OF . 2017. THE FUTURE. 3. LOTS CREATED HEREIN SHALL NOT BE FURTHER DIVIDED IN ANY MANNER WITHIN A PERIOD OF FIVE(5) YEARS WITHOUT FILING OF A FINAL LONG PUT ADMINISTRATOR, JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 4. APPROVAL OF THIS SUBDIVISION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE APPROVAL OF BUILDING PERMITS OR SEWAGE DISPOSAL ON EACH LOT. PERMIT APPROVALS WILL BE SUBJECT TO BUILDING LOTS, PLANS, TYPE OF USE, CONTOURS, AND SOILS ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS. PERMITS WILL BE REVIEWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONDITIONS AND REGULATIONS EXISTING ON THE JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DATE THE PERMIT IS APPLIED FOR. DIRECTOR'S CERTIFICATE DECLARATION, APPROVED BY THE PUBLI 20HiEALTH DEPARTMENT ON THIS DAY KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE, THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS OF THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED, DECLARE THIS PUT TO BE CREATED BY OUR OWN FREE WILL AND CONSENT. ME ALSO GRANT TO THE LOT OWNERS WITHIN DIRECTOR, JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT THIS PLAT THE RIGHT TO USE THE EASEMENTS AS PLATTED FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES SHOWN. MAUNEY/ROGERSON REVOCABLE LMNG TRUST COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: APPROVED BY THE JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS THIS DAY OF , 2012. MARC MAUNEY, TRUSTEE LYNNE ROGERSON, TRUSTEE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS STATE OF WASHINGTON 55 ATTEST CLERK OF THE BOARD COUNTY OF CLALLAM THIS IS To CERTIFY THAT ON THIS DAY OF , 2072. COUNTY TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE: BEFORE ME THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE K ALL TAXES AND ANY DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS FOR WHICH THE LAND WITHIN WASHINGTON, DULY COMMISSIONED AND SWORN PERSONALLY APPEARED MARC THE LAND DIVISION MAY BE LIABLE HAVE BEEN DULY PAID AS REQUIRED BY MAUNEY AND LYNNE ROGERSON, AS TRUSTEES OF THE MAUNEY/ROGERSON REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST WHO EXECUTED THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT AND CHAPTER 58.08.040 R.C.W. ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT THEY SIGNED THE SAME AS THEIR FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN MENTIONED. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. JEFFERSON COUNTY TREASURER DEPUTY DATE NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY ASSESSOR'S APPROVAL: RESIDING AT MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES EXAMINED AND APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2012. JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR ATTEST DEPUTY COUNTY ASSESSOR SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF . 2012. SURVEY RECORDING ACT AT THE REQUEST OF MARC MAUNEY IN••v, AT .M., IN BOOK OF SHORT PUTS. ON PAGE AT THE 2012' REQUEST OF SCOT B. CLARK. 11A3 /P O C.:6,0 COUNTY AUDITOR AUDITORS FILE NUMBER f SHEET ! OF 2 •f,4�.�Cl2Y5 ? n P.O.Boa 3199 NAL LIxx� 935 N NIA An.. A ,,,,,,,,,.n' LAND SURVEYING i,1iR Iso)681-2 RAIN 1 " MAPPING L171�1/ FINAL CHECK-V. DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING Aa 693-55,0 PLAT CHECK: • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT - AL'I'KE Iaaal 661-1111 DRAWN AR 1 SE RY .aaa•.—.v.a•—aas08 Michelle Farfan From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 3:26 PM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: FW: Mauney delineation review Michelle: FYI —this was sent to Marc Mauney this morning. From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 8:55 AM To: 'Marc Mauney/Lynne Rogerson' Subject: FW: Mauney delineation review Marc: Below are comments from Washington Department of Ecology(Ecology), who conducted a third party review of wetland information (the SNR report and my two data sheets)for your property on Marrowstone Island. As you can see from the review below, there is not enough information in the SNR report to conclude that no wetlands occur on your property. You should feel free to contact me if you have any questions about the review or about how to proceed with permitting your applications. Regards, 'Donna.j=am Associate Planner/WetlandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 627_Sheridan Street Port Townsend, Washington. 98368 dfrosthofmraco jefferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Mraz, Richard A. (ECY) [mailto:rmra461©ECY.WA.GOV] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 3:44 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Lund, Perry (ECY) Subject: RE: Mauney delineation review Hi Donna, You have requested that I conduct a third-party review of SNR's delineation report for the Mauney property, located on the south end of Marrowstone Island, in comparison to your field data sheets from a June 2012 site visit that you conducted. Limitations of this review are obvious in that I have not visited the site. My first impression is that you and SNR sampled in different locations and thus,your results are not really comparable. However, some contrasts and more pointed observations can be made by referring to details in the SNR report and your data sheets. 1 Vegetation: SNR's data sheets contain some unusual and incomplete information(vague vegetation indicator statuses and editorial comment on Phalaris, for example), but they do make a positive finding for hydrophytic vegetation. Your data sheets more fully address the vegetation onsite and also result in a positive finding for hydrophytic vegetation. Soils: Per SNR's data sheets,they appear to have found very different soils from your test pits. A few notes on their soils findings: - SP#2 appear to omit soil characteristics between 12 and 17". -Comments on "unsaturated zone flow"are unsupported by specific analysis that demonstrates the"flows"are unsaturated. It is unclear how SNR reaches this conclusion. Page 95 of the SNR report indicates that historic ditch spoils were placed on the west side of the ditch,which appears to coincide with the location of SNR test plots. Based upon their soil data and the aerial photo showing the location of the test pits,could they have been sampling in areas of sidecast from ditch maintenance? Your soil test pit results are significantly different from SNR's. Most notably,you found evidence of redoximorphic features, including oxidized rhizospheres that are a primary indicator of wetland hydrology. Again,this may be primarily because of the differences in your test pit locations. Hydrology: Hydrology is the most significant component of any wetland determination. No water, no wetland. SNR's report indicates that they observed no"groundwater"hydrology during their June site visit. However,they did apparently observe evidence of significant surface water hydrology during their March field visit. Pages 106-107 of the report indicate that ponding(1-2")was observed on portions of the property. Wetlands are defined as "... those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." (highlight added). It appears that no data sheets were completed by SNR in March,despite the fact that it was during the growing season and inundated areas were present. SNR's overall conclusion regarding hydrology appears erroneous since it seems that the consultant is basing a positive finding for wetland hydrology exclusively on the presence of groundwater. As indicated by the regulatory definition, surface water satisfies the wetland hydrology parameter. Based upon the March 2011 visit,a non-wetland determination is not supported by the field conditions. These conditions meet wetland hydrology indicator A 1 and probably A2. I would offer a note of caution regarding the presence of surface water during this particular visit. Rainfall at the Nordland weather station(http://www.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/findweather/getForecast?query=zmw:98358.1.99999) for the early growing season in 2011 and 2012 as follows: 2012 2011 June—3.09" June—0.94" May- 2.07" May-4.66" April -2.93" April - 3.12" March- 5.1" March- 12.33"(!) Referencing the WETS table(http://www.wcc.nres.usda.gov/ftpref/support/climate/wetlands/wa/5303I.txt)and using the nearest station at Chimacum,the average(1949 thru 2001)rainfall for March 2011 is 3.13". In general,the rainfall for early 2011 is significantly higher than the average. It is outside the 30%range considered as normal rainfall in the WETS table. Such a situation does not preclude making a wetland determination, it just requires caution as hydrology may be over-represented. However, as previously noted, it does not support a non-wetland finding like the one made in March 2011. 2 Your reconnaissance in June 2012 conflicts with SNR's findings. You note that the areas you investigated at that time were inundated to a"depth of several inches". Your October 2012 site visit did not observe any surface or groundwater, but this is not a time of year when areas exhibiting seasonal hydrology would be wet. You did observe oxidized rhizospheres,which are a primary indicator of wetland hydrology and therefore satisfy that parameter. You also noted that you observed reduced iron, another primary indicator of wetland hydrology. Did you use alpha-alpha dipyridyl or observe a color change upon exposure to air? It would be helpful to note this in the remarks section. Conclusion: SNR's data sheets do not indicate wetland presence in the areas they sampled. However,they did not reconcile or adequately address their observing wetland hydrology in March (the early part of the growing season). The consultant would have been better served by returning to the site in April and May to determine if the inundated areas continued to meet hydrology indicators A 1 or A2. Your field investigations identified wetland in areas not examined by SNR. I recommend that the site be revisited in the early part of the growing season in 2013, with a special emphasis placed on those areas that both SNR and you observed ponding. You may need to consider the installation of shallow groundwater monitoring wells to document the duration of inundation or shallow groundwater hydrology to determine if the suspect areas meet the parameter specified in the regional supplement: 14 or more consecutive days of flooding, ponding, or a water table 12 in. (30 cm)or less below the soil surface during the growing season. I hope that this review is suitable for your purposes. Please let me know if you have questions or require clarification on any of these comments. GliicA cffta:,?WS Wetlands/Shorelancls Specialist Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program Southwest Regional Office (360)407-6221 rmra461 @ec, .wa.Aov 3 Michelle Farfan From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 3:26 PM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: FW: Mauney delineation review Michelle: FYI—this was sent to Marc Mauney this morning. From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 8:55 AM To: 'Marc Mauney/Lynne Rogerson' Subject: FW: Mauney delineation review Marc: Below are comments from Washington Department of Ecology(Ecology), who conducted a third party review of wetland information (the SNR report and my two data sheets) for your property on Marrowstone Island. As you can see from the review below, there is not enough information in the SNR report to conclude that no wetlands occur on your property. You should feel free to contact me if you have any questions about the review or about how to proceed with permitting your applications. Regards, Davtvta,Fro-ato-1m Associate Planner/WetlandSpeciaCut Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, Washington. 98368 cfjrostholm aco jefferson.wa.us 360.3;9.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails maybe subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Mraz, Richard A. (ECY) [mailto:rmra461 @ECY.WA.GOV] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 3:44 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Lund, Perry (ECY) Subject: RE: Mauney delineation review Hi Donna, You have requested that I conduct a third-party review of SNR's delineation report for the Mauney property, located on the south end of Marrowstone Island, in comparison to your field data sheets from a June 2012 site visit that you conducted. Limitations of this review are obvious in that I have not visited the site. My first impression is that you and SNR sampled in different locations and thus,your results are not really comparable. However, some contrasts and more pointed observations can be made by referring to details in the SNR report and your data sheets. 1 Vegetation: SNR's data sheets contain some unusual and incomplete information(vague vegetation indicator statuses and editorial comment on Phalaris, for example), but they do make a positive finding for hydrophytic vegetation. Your data sheets more fully address the vegetation onsite and also result in a positive finding for hydrophytic vegetation. Soils: Per SNR's data sheets,they appear to have found very different soils from your test pits. A few notes on their soils findings: - SP#2 appear to omit soil characteristics between 12 and 17". - Comments on"unsaturated zone flow"are unsupported by specific analysis that demonstrates the"flows"are unsaturated. It is unclear how SNR reaches this conclusion. Page 95 of the SNR report indicates that historic ditch spoils were placed on the west side of the ditch,which appears to coincide with the location of SNR test plots. Based upon their soil data and the aerial photo showing the location of the test pits,could they have been sampling in areas of sidecast from ditch maintenance? Your soil test pit results are significantly different from SNR's. Most notably,you found evidence of redoximorphic features, including oxidized rhizospheres that are a primary indicator of wetland hydrology. Again,this may be primarily because of the differences in your test pit locations. Hydrology: Hydrology is the most significant component of any wetland determination. No water,no wetland. SNR's report indicates that they observed no "groundwater"hydrology during their June site visit. However,they did apparently observe evidence of significant surface water hydrology during their March field visit. Pages 106-107 of the report indicate that ponding(1-2")was observed on portions of the property. Wetlands are defined as"... those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." (highlight added). It appears that no data sheets were completed by SNR in March, despite the fact that it was during the growing season and inundated areas were present. SNR's overall conclusion regarding hydrology appears erroneous since it seems that the consultant is basing a positive finding for wetland hydrology exclusively on the presence of groundwater. As indicated by the regulatory definition, surface water satisfies the wetland hydrology parameter. Based upon the March 2011 visit, a non-wetland determination is not supported by the field conditions. These conditions meet wetland hydrology indicator Al and probably A2. I would offer a note of caution regarding the presence of surface water during this particular visit. Rainfall at the Nordland weather station(http://www.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/findweather/getForecast?query=zmw:98358.1.99999) for the early growing season in 2011 and 2012 as follows: 2012 2011 June—3.09" June—0.94" May-2.07" May-4.66" April-2.93" April -3.12" March - 5.1" March- 12.33"(!) Referencing the WETS table(http://www.wcc.nres.usda.gov/ftpref/support/climate/wetlands/wa/53031.txt)and using the nearest station at Chimacum, the average(1949 thru 2001)rainfall for March 2011 is 3.13". In general,the rainfall for early 2011 is significantly higher than the average. It is outside the 30%range considered as normal rainfall in the WETS table. Such a situation does not preclude making a wetland determination, it just requires caution as hydrology may be over-represented. However, as previously noted, it does not support a non-wetland finding like the one made in March 2011. 2 Your reconnaissance in June 2012 conflicts with SNR's findings. You note that the areas you investigated at that time were inundated to a"depth of several inches". Your October 2012 site visit did not observe any surface or groundwater, but this is not a time of year when areas exhibiting seasonal hydrology would be wet. You did observe oxidized rhizospheres, which are a primary indicator of wetland hydrology and therefore satisfy that parameter. You also noted that you observed reduced iron, another primary indicator of wetland hydrology. Did you use alpha-alpha dipyridyl or observe a color change upon exposure to air? It would be helpful to note this in the remarks section. Conclusion: SNR's data sheets do not indicate wetland presence in the areas they sampled. However,they did not reconcile or adequately address their observing wetland hydrology in March (the early part of the growing season). The consultant would have been better served by returning to the site in April and May to determine if the inundated areas continued to meet hydrology indicators Al or A2. Your field investigations identified wetland in areas not examined by SNR. I recommend that the site be revisited in the early part of the growing season in 2013, with a special emphasis placed on those areas that both SNR and you observed ponding. You may need to consider the installation of shallow groundwater monitoring wells to document the duration of inundation or shallow groundwater hydrology to determine if the suspect areas meet the parameter specified in the regional supplement: 14 or more consecutive days of flooding, ponding, or a water table 12 in. (30 cm) or less below the soil surface during the growing season. I hope that this review is suitable for your purposes. Please let me know if you have questions or require clarification on any of these comments. °Tick p'ttaz,PWS Wetlands/Shorelands Specialist Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program Southwest Regional Office (360)407-6221 rmra461 @ecy.wa.gov 3 • Michelle Farfan From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 10:10 AM To: Michelle Farfan; David W. Johnson Subject: FW: Mauney delineation review Michelle and David: Both of you are working on applications for Marc Mauney so I am forwarding this email from Ecology on for your files. The upshot of the email is that there is not enough information in the SNR report to conclude that wetlands do not occur on the Mauney parcel. I have forwarded this email onto Marc and have let him know he should feel free to contact me if he has any questions. Donna From: Mraz, Richard A. (ECY) [mailto:rmra461 @ECY.WA.GOV] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 3:44 PM To: Donna Frostholm Cc: Lund, Perry (ECY) Subject: RE: Mauney delineation review Hi Donna, You have requested that I conduct a third-party review of SNR's delineation report for the Mauney property, located on the south end of Marrowstone Island, in comparison to your field data sheets from a June 2012 site visit that you conducted. Limitations of this review are obvious in that I have not visited the site. My first impression is that you and SNR sampled in different locations and thus,your results are not really comparable. However, some contrasts and more pointed observations can be made by referring to details in the SNR report and your data sheets. Vegetation: SNR's data sheets contain some unusual and incomplete information (vague vegetation indicator statuses and editorial comment on Phalaris, for example), but they do make a positive finding for hydrophytic vegetation. Your data sheets more fully address the vegetation onsite and also result in a positive finding for hydrophytic vegetation. Soils: Per SNR's data sheets,they appear to have found very different soils from your test pits. A few notes on their soils findings: - SP#2 appear to omit soil characteristics between 12 and 17". - Comments on "unsaturated zone flow"are unsupported by specific analysis that demonstrates the"flows"are unsaturated. It is unclear how SNR reaches this conclusion. Page 95 of the SNR report indicates that historic ditch spoils were placed on the west side of the ditch, which appears to coincide with the location of SNR test plots. Based upon their soil data and the aerial photo showing the location of the test pits, could they have been sampling in areas of sidecast from ditch maintenance? Your soil test pit results are significantly different from SNR's. Most notably,you found evidence of redoximorphic features, including oxidized rhizospheres that are a primary indicator of wetland hydrology. Again,this may be primarily because of the differences in your test pit locations. 1 'Hydrology: Hydrology is the most significant component of any wetland determination. No water, no wetland. SNR's report indicates that they observed no"groundwater"hydrology during their June site visit. However,they did apparently observe evidence of significant surface water hydrology during their March field visit. Pages 106-107 of the report indicate that ponding(1-2")was observed on portions of the property. Wetlands are defined as"... those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support,and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." (highlight added). It appears that no data sheets were completed by SNR in March, despite the fact that it was during the growing season and inundated areas were present. SNR's overall conclusion regarding hydrology appears erroneous since it seems that the consultant is basing a positive finding for wetland hydrology exclusively on the presence of groundwater. As indicated by the regulatory definition, surface water satisfies the wetland hydrology parameter. Based upon the March 2011 visit, a non-wetland determination is not supported by the field conditions. These conditions meet wetland hydrology indicator A 1 and probably A2. I would offer a note of caution regarding the presence of surface water during this particular visit. Rainfall at the Nordland weather station (http://www.wunderground.com/cgi-bin/findweather/getForecast?query=zmw:98358.1.99999) for the early growing season in 2011 and 2012 as follows: 2012 2011 June—3.09" June—0.94" May-2.07" May-4.66" April-2.93" April -3.12" March - 5.1" March- 12.33"(!) Referencing the WETS table(http://www.wcc.nres.usda.gov/ftpref/support/climate/wetlands/wa/5303I.txt)and using the nearest station at Chimacum, the average (1949 thru 2001)rainfall for March 2011 is 3.13". In general,the rainfall for early 2011 is significantly higher than the average. It is outside the 30%range considered as normal rainfall in the WETS table. Such a situation does not preclude making a wetland determination, it just requires caution as hydrology may be over-represented. However, as previously noted, it does not support a non-wetland finding like the one made in March 2011. Your reconnaissance in June 2012 conflicts with SNR's findings. You note that the areas you investigated at that time were inundated to a"depth of several inches". Your October 2012 site visit did not observe any surface or groundwater, but this is not a time of year when areas exhibiting seasonal hydrology would be wet. You did observe oxidized rhizospheres, which are a primary indicator of wetland hydrology and therefore satisfy that parameter. You also noted that you observed reduced iron, another primary indicator of wetland hydrology. Did you use alpha-alpha dipyridyl or observe a color change upon exposure to air? It would be helpful to note this in the remarks section. Conclusion: SNR's data sheets do not indicate wetland presence in the areas they sampled. However,they did not reconcile or adequately address their observing wetland hydrology in March(the early part of the growing season). The consultant would have been better served by returning to the site in April and May to determine if the inundated areas continued to meet hydrology indicators Al or A2. Your field investigations identified wetland in areas not examined by SNR. I recommend that the site be revisited in the early part of the growing season in 2013, with a special emphasis placed on those areas that both SNR and you observed ponding. You may need to consider the installation of shallow groundwater monitoring wells to document the duration of inundation or shallow groundwater hydrology to determine if the suspect areas meet the parameter specified in the regional supplement: 14 or more consecutive days of flooding,ponding, or a water table 12 in. (30 cm)or less below the soil surface during the growing season. 2 'I hope that this review is suitable for your purposes. Please let me know if you have questions or require clarification on any of these comments. p?(ak p ttaz,PWS Wetlands/Shorelands Specialist Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program Southwest Regional Office (360)407-6221 rmra461 @ecy.wa.gov 3 Michelle Farfan From: Randy Marx Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 9:58 AM To: Terry McHugh;john fleming Cc: Michelle Farfan Subject: Mauney SUB12-11 Hi Terry Per your request here is what health is looking for. Michelle will have other items for you from other departments once she has received all "our" comments. So more is coming. • Resolving the issue of the location of the reserve drainfield site for the northern most home permitted under SEP03-00063. Reserve area not shown on survey dated 6/8/12. REOUIRES one of the following: o Make application to re-designate the reserve drainfield area, septic designer required, or o Adjust the proposed property line • Showing the reserve drainfield area for the southern most home permitted under SEP03-00064 also not shown on the original survey dated 6/8/12. fl- 'ix Always Working For a Safer& Healthier Jefferson County 360 385 9402 ><((((°> x/rr°> / ><('(('> ><((((G> ><,rr,(:. (>(<((((Q> >< ((' ><((((> ><(((((hi ><> ><> >[{{{..> ><>x>><(l((a> ><{c> ><(. ( O>>< l l f> ><(((( > (r> ><( r> ><{{{•> ><( (r> Online Septic Permits Web Link Environmental Health Web Site Link CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: ;i... .A)t. r-r[, e , . rr .r <el eei . `r<x ,._ el *r PI BI IC RECO NFIS.ACT NOI'I( )d ,r•,t kx th, ( f:;-,r,on( ,,nniv s'-tarot .,1 F".C',`.' ,_ ut*rn 16'coni- <lss thr {'.(wally nllHt retell-&:•this e mail,t;,isl /IS ci,nte .,1. n...r, ,,z,1-, !:,, in I„ h rl*1,ss 11 is, trrxn jiea°icy ur'v 11ns3,'r'si dte l,.l w,ins ludi1V RC lF 4::L3r+. 1 Michelle Farfan From: Susan Porto Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 1:34 PM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: Randy Marx Subject: SUB12-11 Attachments: SUB12-11.pdf Enclosed are comments from Health regarding the referenced subdivision. Susan and Randy. Susaw Porto R.S. jef fersow Couwtd Public HEALth Phowe 360.3869404 FAX.360.379.4487 Always Worlei.wg fora safer§ IteaLthierje f fersow Couwt CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message,including any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,use,disclosure,or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT NOTICE: All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is exempt from disclosure under state law,including RCW 42.56. 1 SUS` ^ °4 (`< JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH 615 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend •Washington • 98368 www.jeffersoncountypublichealth.org Memo To: MICHELE FARFAN From: Randy Marx & Susan Porto Date: October 15, 2012 Re: SUB12-00011 Health Department Comments SEPTIC Preliminary approval is granted based on; • Resolving the issue of the location of the reserve drainfield site for the northern most home permitted under SEP03-00063. Reserve area not shown on survey dated 6/8/12. REQUIRES one of the following: o Make application to re-designate the reserve drainfield area, septic designer required, or o Adjust the proposed property line • Showing the reserve drainfield area for the southern most home permitted under SEP03-00064 also not shown on the original survey dated 6/8/12. • Each system must have a current O&M inspection. • The site inspection of 10/3/12 and review of the soils submitted indicate that there are areas with soils suitable to support onsite sewage systems on each of the proposed lots. • The lot sizes meet minimum land area requirements specified in WAC246- 272A for the soil type and water supply proposed. Prior to final approval BY Health the following is needed: • Resolution of the reserve drainfield areas referenced above for the two existing homes on the property. COMMUNITY HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES PUBLIC HEALTH WATER QUALITY MAIN: (360) 385-9400 ALWAYS WORMING FOR A SAFER AND MAIN: (360)385-9444 FAX: (360)385-9401 HEALTHIER COMMUNITY FAX: (360)379-4487 WATER Prior to preliminary approval Health will need: • The parcel is within the current water service area of the Quimper Water System. The certificate of water supply utility service review application must be completed, signed by the applicant and process through the Jefferson County PUD #1. Completed form must then be submitted. Prior to final approval BY Health the following is needed: • All existing wells must be labeled "not approved for potable water supply" and state the intended use of the well. If the wells are unusable (as defined by WAC 173-160-381) they shall be decommissioned in accordance with WAC 173-160-381 and comply with Jefferson County Health Department Policy Statement 96-02. • Please label the wells with the unique ID number on the well tag, if available. • Water meters and water lines to serve each parcel must be installed to meet requirements per JC 18.35.130 (1) (b). Show meter and/or water line locations as installed on the face of the plat. COMMUNITY HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES AC�NAYSJ�JRKINGFORASAr�RAP4D WATER QUALITY FAX 360-385-9401 360-385-9400 6 0-8 5-94 0 100 HEALTHIER COMMUNITY MAIN: 36037 FAX 366379 9-4487 -4487 Michelle Farfan From: Marc Mauney/Lynne Rogerson [marclynne @q.com) Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:04 AM To: Michelle Farfan Cc: Terry McHugh; Tadas Kisielius Subject: Re: Mauney/ Rogerson Short Plat(MLA12-141 /SUB12-11) Michelle, I'll wait for the county and/or DOE wetlands delineation determination. Please let Terry and I know as soon as you have any additional information regarding wetland delineation. Marc Mauney Michelle Farfan Associate Planner,FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan@cojefferson.wa.us 360-379-V457 360-379-9473 (fax) All voice messages and e-mails received by Jefferson County maY be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 92.56'RGW. please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am -4:30 pm Monday to Thursday and closed on fl idaYS. From: Tmch @olypen.com [mailto:tmch @olypen.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:54 PM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: Re: Mauney/ Rogerson Short Plat (MLA12-141 / SUB12-11) please go ahead and call Marc Mauney and explain it to him directly. he returns from vacation tomorrow. thanks TM Sent from my iPhone On Jul 25, 2012, at 12:04 PM, "Michelle Farfan" <mfarfan(c4co.jefferson.wa.us> wrote: <image001.jpg> Hi Terry: i T am in receipt of the above short plat. I'm in a bit of a dilemma. I am trying to get this noticed prior to my 3 week vacation 8/6. There has not been a determination by the department yet regarding if the county & state agree with the wetland delineation so it not clear whether I should notice it with SEPA or not. I spoke with Stacie about this and she suggested I let you know that if the applicant wants to pay for SEPA per WAC197-11-800(6(a), I can try and get it noticed before I leave on vacation (I won't be back until 8/27) or it can wait until I get back and for determination by DOE if they also agree with the wetland delineation. If the applicant wants to proceed with noticing, the SEPA fee is $740.00. If it turns out that SEPA isn't required after it is noticed, I can refund the $740. I have not contacted the applicant (I don't have his email) but can call Mr. Mauney if you would prefer me too. Please let me know as soon as possible so I have time to prepare the legal notice and agency packets if it is to be noticed before I leave. Regards. Michelle Farfan Associate planner,FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan port Townsend WA, 98368 mfarfan@cojefferson.wa.us 36o-379-9#57 360-379-173 (fax) All voice messages and e-mails received by Jefferson County may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56RCW. Please note that DCD hours changed as Of December 1, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am -q:3o pm Monday to Thursday and closed on Fridays. 2 Michelle Farfan From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 12:05 PM To: 'Terry McHugh' Subject: Mauney/ Rogerson Short Plat (MLA12-141 / SUB12-11) Importance: High Hi Terry: I am in receipt of the above short plat. I'm in a bit of a dilemma. I am trying to get this noticed prior to my 3 week vacation 8/6. There has not been a determination by the department yet regarding if the county & state agree with the wetland delineation so it not clear whether I should notice it with SEPA or not. I spoke with Stacie about this and she suggested I let you know that if the applicant wants to pay for SEPA per WAC197-11-800(6(a), I can try and get it noticed before I leave on vacation (I won't be back until 8/27) or it can wait until I get back and for determination by DOE if they also agree with the wetland delineation. If the applicant wants to proceed with noticing, the SEPA fee is $740.00. If it turns out that SEPA isn't required after it is noticed, I can refund the $740. I have not contacted the applicant (I don't have his email) but can call Mr. Mauney if you would prefer me too. Please let me know as soon as possible so I have time to prepare the legal notice and agency packets if it is to be noticed before I leave. Regards, Michelle Farfan Associate Planner,FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan@cojefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473(fax) All voice messages and e-maiis received by Jefferson County may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56RCW Please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am -9:3o pm Monday to Thursday and closed on Fridays. 1 Michelle Farfan From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 11:52 AM To: 'Scot Clark' Subject: Mauney Short Plat(MLA12-141 /SUB12-11) Hi Scot: Can you send me 2 more large size maps? I am planning on noticing this for 8/1 of which I will be mailing the county and state packets out on 7/27. Thanks. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner,FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 622 Sheridan port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan @co,jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) All voice messages and e-mails received by Jefferson County may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. Please note that DCD hours changed as of December i, 2008. Our office Is open to the public 9:00 am -4:30 pm Monday to Thursday and closed on Fridays. 1 ��4SON COQ 4, JEFFERSON COUNTY 440 ti / DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVE OPMFNT S 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend • Wa t{in I "4S` NG`ZO 360/379-4450 - 360/379-4451 Fax www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopmen ' JUN 1 9 2012 I d to L. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST. ,JEFFERSON COUNTY .OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Purpose of checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done)and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over,a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: t # Ji t j ( eccierset S art' 'cLa 2. Name of applicant: Mkv"*-5 C.a-o%crso.J 124.4 c.:'/• -scow$A-- 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 2133 woe_ 13Ry off , a..T vlo..a.Le c.K. vJ Jti 41153 3 4. Date checklist prepared: 4��Z 5. Agency requesting checklist: i)CD 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable) .Yiv- G:\Porn itCenterl#ff#FORMS##Y1DRO FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklisl_FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page 7. Do you have any plans for future additions. expansion. or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 14.4 V -. ; a cor 44\ 6{1;4-5 - a 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared. directly related to this proposal. bu y f lair-8- 1¢ 1 NC.0.. r o A - 5 V‘o w.t∎Nc d }o M,c.4e.I le. c..1) 9 r.t or 40 Pmt — Art? 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Ott A 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) • J t.oic 51.4)r-1( P(.•* Or 3 ,F.S A-c-5 • 9rppos4 c Post Q 1.. ko.S 5 4CA., t..o��2 � .A-T) 1 Z. 655 f 4.14(Ltcl • tea rt.GtS } 3 CP nPObtc0 ac..,_ Lo- c1 w0.4Gr 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. IO.rrk.LL td 4pcoAtA k t r -44...t (.p a' 300..wt V, IZ.af, c"A -Kt Sow tnd c dla.r sr-oca5{0 rS. (cadet stb 1. S 5 t-d q( "Bat A,A) lacia B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling hilly. steep slopes, mountainous, other. G:\PermilCenterl#N#FORMS##p1DRD FORMSISEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev../14/2008 Page b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? AJ p CAA., C.ru., 5 % — wa,.kr b1.1 c• c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. 501..(.D C■41 5 p 4_'_E_ Po r _J d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NO e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. #JIOc- t Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. N O g.About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? t4 eve-4 CAN clonAIL Vv. ..=N04..rYto V3 are ate. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: ,s/.Pr a.Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Nlk..- b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. a c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: ,l(pr 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. t SGFF(p . ?��p�: G Wow-'-- 4� pLo.4-S 4-o IGa- Sa.>► .1 Sloe 0.4 W61, U N {Z a j 424 a 0.n �_ M a tr,r o u..)s40 NA_ 12-4- 4- D t All R-c■ . do a a o 4: °Ye- d ;S-ck- - nib 7=le - S T � v—o J l� i ,_ a v-uL a\PermitCenlerl###FORMSMJF#\DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page 2)Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Np 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 141 P'l 4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. _o 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. N 0 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. r,) b. Ground: 1)Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 130 s' po , 0 J' G.v4 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. o 55 'r• St a sr -ILL -f-i Pkg.. n o o itat.�o P•-o inb ae� c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. r4V0 L viark-s v- 6,et Z %Mslet ca • E . rt it v r e ul s 4d►4_ 2)Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. n10 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: w;\l n 0• t.2 a Ihr4 kc o v. e F nr.n 1 NC:1 -55r5 SC. G:1PermitCerderW##FORMS###1DRD FORMSISEPA Environmental Checklist FINAL.doc Rev.4/142008 Page 4. Plants a. Chick or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ✓ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other V evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other V shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? nl et.n1Qr c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. 14 I IN d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: 1 GA-sP kSSc. v / MLoc — (ocb W , 1\ k kuop3r }o CAL % nArV Ai(.-I. 5Lo -L P,.Ai— i Douy. -,r) So-C.4 Na o f'bc a.. V.-- 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the si birds: haw heron eagle songbirds, other: mamma s: CD be k, beaver, other: fish: bass, sa mon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. ,,Jr pr/ c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. 'J84iL k,no1,J d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: IJr1( 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing. etc. 14(P G]PermltCenter\AWFORMS4441DRD FORMS\SEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so. generally describe. ap c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: N r 7. Environmental health a Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. piIPI 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Ar -- b. Noise 1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? A-,r act;c. or) ats,rvut, 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short- term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 1.1 b tnt-v 1 AC.M2&.k 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Af 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Qvr Po-rc.-62-4 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. le-41 - ��S�b r is o y i ZJ 0,, \ k •� c� ti0�.l aSS G]PermitCenter1###FORMS/44/1DRD FORMSISEPA Environmental Checklist_F[NAL.doe Rev.4/14/2008 Page c. Describe any structures on the site. a �" o Q5 - Ark An (A)( I' r Q WeA AV l) + ) «r J 1 d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? N a What is the current zoning classification of the site? IZQ. 1:'O f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? 2.a-5. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? ■nGr■ h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" or critical area? If so, specify. 1r n w h ati¢ a_•4-c-L , c v�kCa��_ � �.v►re o N 51-0 v.)5 41...-v- %Irk_ - i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?,JIK j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: n! 0�1 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Jipr b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. ,J(K c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: G:1PerroltCenterl##kFORMS0#01DRD FORMSISEPA Environmental Checklist FINAL.doc Rev.4/14/2008 Page 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? °I K b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?, ,J t. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Ni 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? NI14—. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Nee- d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 01.pr-- 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? .c 'a n A. 4) - R_ ua aGw Pork �O '1'64 w<S'- b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. /Jo c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: tJ/ 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. N O b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. ,sI c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 1/44,...— G:1PermltCenterUW#FORMS##g1DRD FORMS\SERA Environmental Checklisl_FINALdoc Rev.4114/200B Page 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. E. x.s �\�M\ b`1 1.vu h } -,S 11 + �.0 Qrov. dK� e.4.44 4b X2,0\ b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? rj c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? iJfrc d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). 140 e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. a p f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 0'0„..„ g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: .!(per 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services(for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. r� o b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. .;I G 1Permi1Cenle V##FORMS###\DRD FORMSISEPA Environmental Checklist_FINAL.doc Rev 4/14/2008 Page 16. Utilities a. • le utilities currently availa• - a e sit- electrici natural gas, water refuse service, telephon- sanitary sewer, septic syste i of - b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. rJ orJ e- C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. CoA -KLiz e w^t-A) Date Submitted: ...5 J— i 12,- G.\PermiICenter\i! FORMS###1DRD FORMSISEPA Environmental Ghecklist_FINAL.tloc Rev.4/14/2009 Page ee t•ro Ice S,wmt94 co-Pr/Lot ook ,/ ` gaov,ro Fit isriN'a-wti+-PER (0i5rsk 1\ sap IA-te l \ we � D, ,1 1 itiN I1 Mt wk {z Je Po-1p i / y1 E-- pi 50E`I Rat-b--' 131 3L ft) N 1 ` tiN 504-TIM",6v f1 P 0 / i 5 i„ ZO -TP - TPQ w TP Q e \ 1, TPO -. T �U �� . 2 j i • EC W E t D FtEi D ta li < �� JUN 1 9 2012 5tiQo3 63� Seprtc 5 tSTL'� JEFFERSON COUNTY ex. DEPT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ice' 4 7 4$ O Nest o 1 (111 PA V ,i r.01 SotL 1-E9t"Ptr '`' s y_erc- /sci.6 KAN /4-po ILI-dg'{-Otto A soG,43'Ct) ScOTTrl,. CLte t 3 e t'1AQS ca+1 11.1. 11 ENCiNCy NG�, S.,_ ,.. 5 3-63 s t c �pt�i�, Guy K IaND c''0 � � 1�r /"1!{UN E'�A66,64561/41 OFFicE FR_ciMJt'4k_y sHOLI pL�T. 5tTE \ Ep,:41.., o T-R-u51- -F14T L E LtxkTioN 5 A.p..& Aw.,ox iptA-M. fit:,,� o ZRif x t-. 3,�� Q 31 207 , 2.1-53 OM i A'( RAM) 4,A., %:,,,,. Engineering asR _ , (og F� W coc 1NA , 124 W. Sims Way 4g cN$ q oN L Port Townsend, WA 98368 scA t_E: u - oTHe. DAir'KrrIy wok-reg. wt us '1 txi5r SZEONEEMEMINI 1 IN iTittr (et' Of Sk&J Gtt' PMo6L.This sraDy VDT APPROVED FOR RELEASE o 50' 1071 �o�' Dip NoC iI-E5eRgat I tcrkTE WEw'S, oTKO- 1")ThOUT ORIGINAL SIGNATURE p1 THCS2 5%L pai p• I "';i E ISSUED; SKIT I I y�1317,011. JSF Engineering John Scott Fleming Engineering, Inc. 1240 West Sims Way #45, Port Townsend, WA 98368 voice: (360) 452-8500, 800-248-6008, email: jsfEnci olypen.com,or john.jsf.engineering @gmail.com - SOIL LOG per WAC 246-272A & B, & ASTM D5921 - April 24, 2012 Client: Mauney & Rogerson Trust 2133 Oak Bay Road Port Hadlock, WA 98339 Location: 91 Baldwin Road, Nordland, WA 98358 Parcel#921-094-026 Excavated: April 23, 2012 by Terry McHugh Logged: April 23, 2012 by John S. Fleming, P.E. Weather: Sunny Please see separate soil test pit sketch for soil test pit locations. Test Pit 1: Restrictive at 23"+/- varies 19-33" 0-4" Dark brown gravelly sandy loam, weak granular structure, low penetration resistance, many roots, dry to moist. Type 4 soil. 4-23" Brown & reddish brown gravelly sandy loam &gravelly loamy sand, stratified, single grain to weak subangular blocky structure, low penetration resistance, common roots, wavy boundary 19-33", moist. Type 3 &4 soil. 23-27" Light grayish brown gravelly sandy loam &gravelly loamy sand, massive to moderate subangular blocky structure, moderate to high penetration resistance, few medium distinct light gray & reddish brown mottles, few roots, wavy boundary 23-39", moist to wet. Type 3 &4 soil. 27-42" Light olive brown gravelly sandy loam, massive, high penetration resistance, moist. Type 7 soil. Test Pit 2: Restrictive at 22"+/- varies 20-30" 0-5" Dark brown gravelly sandy loam, weak granular structure, low penetration resistance, many roots, moist. Type 4 soil. 5-22" Brown, dark brown & light reddish brown gravelly sandy loam, pockets of very gravelly sandy loam, few cobbles, moderate subangular blocky structure, moderate penetration resistance, common roots, wavy boundary 20-30", moist. Type 4 soil. 22-30" Brown&grayish brown gravelly sandy loam&sandy loam, massive to strong subangular blocky structure, moderately high penetration resistance, few medium distinct gray & reddish brown mottles, common roots, many large prominent light gray &dark reddish brown mottle& root mat at lower boundary, wavy boundary 28-34", moist. Type 4 & 7 soil. 30-41" Olive brown sandy loam, massive, high penetration resistance, few large prominent light gray &dark reddish brown mottles, dry to moist. Type 7 soil. Test Pit 3: Restrictive at 20" 0-7" Dark brown gravelly sandy loam, weak granular structure, low penetration resistance, many roots, moist. Type 4 soil. 7-20" Brown & dark brown gravelly sandy loam, pockets of very gravelly coarse sandy loam, single grain to moderate subangular blocky structure, moderate penetration resistance, many roots, few charred roots, moist. Type 4 soil. 20-24" Grayish brown gravelly sandy loam, moderate subangular blocky structure, moderate penetration resistance, few medium faint light reddish brown mottles, common roots, root mat at lower boundary, wavy boundary 23-25", moist. Type 4 soil. 24-44" Light brownish gray sandy loam, <10% gravel, massive, high penetration resistance, dry, moderate Soil Log for Mauney&Rogerson Trust, Job 12006, Page 1 penetration resistant fingers& lenses of large prominent light gray & reddish brown mottles &few roots, moist to wet. Type 7 soil. Test Pit 4: Restrictive at 30"+/- varies 28-36" 0-8" Black gravelly sandy loam, moderate granular structure, low penetration resistance, many roots, moist. Type 4 soil. 8-30" Brown, dark brown & grayish brown gravelly sandy loam, moderate subangular blocky structure, moderate penetration resistance, common roots, wavy boundary 28-36", moist. Type 4 soil. 30-56" Light brownish gray gravelly sandy loam, massive, moderate to moderately high penetration resistance, common fine to medium distinct light gray&reddish brown mottles,few roots, moist to wet,water standing at 53". Type 7 soil. Test Pit 5: Restrictive at 24"+ varies 24-27" 0-9" Dark brown gravelly sandy loam, weak granular structure, low penetration resistance, many roots, moist. Type 4 soil. 9-27" Brown&light grayish brown gravelly sandy loam, pockets of very gravelly coarse sandy loam, single grain &weak to moderate subangular blocky structure, low to moderate penetration resistance, common roots, few charred roots, wavy boundary 25-31", moist, common medium distinct light gray mottles&root mat at wavy lower boundary, starting at 24-27". Type 4 soil. 27-48" Light olive gray sandy loam, <10% gravel, massive, high penetration resistance, few medium distinct reddish brown & light gray mottles, moist to wet, water standing at 47". Type 7 soil. Test Pit 6: Restrictive at 27"+ varies 24-34" 0-5" Black sandy loam, weak granular structure, low penetration resistance, many roots, dry. Type 4 soil. 5-27" Brown loamy sand & medium sand, <10% gravel, single grain to very weak subangular blocky structure, low penetration resistance, few roots, irregular boundary 24-34", dry to moist. Type 3 soil. 27-60" Gray, yellowish brown &dark reddish brown medium sand & loamy sand, single grain to strong subangular blocky structure, low to moderately high penetration resistance, common roots to 42", moist. Type 3 soil. Test Pit 7: Restrictive at 40"+/- 0-5" Black sandy loam & brown loamy sand, weak granular to weak subangular blocky structure, low penetration resistance, many roots, few charred roots, irregular boundary 3-41", dry to moist. Type 4 soil. 5-40" Light grayish brown & light yellowish brown loamy sand& medium sand, single grain to weak subangular blocky structure, low penetration resistance, common roots, dry to moist. Type 3 soil. 40-62" Light brownish gray, yellowish brown & reddish brown loamy sand & medium sand, single grain to moderate subangular blocky structure, low to moderate penetration resistance, few roots to 54", moist. Type 3 soil. Test Pit 8: Restrictive at 37"+/- 0-6" Black sandy loam, weak granular structure, low penetration resistance, many roots, moist. Type 4 soil. 6-37" Brown loamy sand & medium sand, single grain to weak subangular blocky structure, low penetration resistance, common roots, dry to moist. Type 3 soil. 37-63" Light grayish brown, light yellowish brown &dark reddish brown loamy sand &medium sand, single grain to moderate subangular blocky structure, low to moderate penetration resistance, few roots to 48", moist. • Type 3 soil. Soil Log for Mauney&Rogerson Trust,Job 12006,Page 2 Test Pit 9: Restrictive at 32"+/- varies 30-35" 0-7" Black sandy loam, weak granular structure, low penetration resistance, many roots, irregular boundary 5-15", dry to moist. Type 4 soil. 7-32" Brown & light brownish gray loamy sand, single grain to weak subangular blocky structure, low penetration resistance, common roots, wavy boundary 30-35", moist. Type 3 soil. 32-60" Light yellowish brown, brown, reddish brown &gray loamy sand & medium sand, pockets of fine sandy loam, single grain to moderate subangular blocky structure, moderate penetration resistance, moist. Type 3 & 4 soil. Soil Log for Mauney&Rogerson Trust,Job 12006, Page 3 dun, 14. 20'2 3: 16PM PUD#1 of Jefferson County No, 0071 P. 2 Public Utility District #1 Of Jefferson County WATER AVAILABILITY NOTIFICATION Board of Commissioners Barney Burke,District 9 PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM Kenneth A. McMillen, District Wayne G. King, District 3 To: Jefferson County Environmental Health Department James G. Parker, Manager From: Quimper Water System System Operator(s): Eric Storey, Jerry Rubert C�D E Ii V State ID Number: 05783U V JUN 1 9 2012 Number of existing connections: - .(Estimated) A/4-AI i Number of permitted connections: 3II�� JEFFERSON COUNTY M t e7-l)- T I DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Carl�I-e[,�ttanS �n�m�l-fd, : This water system is capable of; and will supply potable water to the following location: Assessor's Parcel ID# 2-, (AL/ 0 (p LegalDescription • /- -r L/ ***Water Connection is available once all fees/charges have been paid*'°y' Site Address: - j n Li NA /Md e r Signature: —~,„ ��� /ma Title: . -i- vrc-e Date: (i/11l/2, THIS IS A NON-BINDING STATEMENT OF WATER AVAILABILITY. IT PROVIDES THAT AT THE TIMEOF REQUEST, WATER IS AVAILABLE WITHIN THIS SYSTEM. THIS NOTIFICATIOON IS GOOD FOR ONE YEAR 230 Chfmacum Road/P.O.Box 929,Port Hadlock,WA 98339 PH(360)385-5800 FX(350)385-5945 • .785--St YS Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan St, Port Townsend WA 98368, (360)379-4450 APPLICATION FOR DETERMINATION OF ADEQUATE POTABLE WATER SUPPLY Resolution#99-90 requires building permit applicants to provide evidence of an adequate potable water supply. Name f- Mr+JI12lt 1 ( oyvae.r3 2e%).. l:N. I-'f'J3 Phone 38 5- So 32 - 3 T?-%/5'7 Nu)) Mailing Address 2-133 Oak. 1341 Rcl , / r ck– t'J* Zip Code 98 337 Parcel ID# qZ I- d - 624. Subdiv. Block Lot(s) Site Address 9 64t..l dui' /JotdGay) LA/4- Zip Code Type of Structure )40 J,& t- A D 3 Check all that apply Note: Special conditions may apply within Seawater Intrusion Protection Zones. (SIPZ) Alternative system(provide justification and design per Jefferson County Environmental Health policy 97-01) Valid Water Right Permit(generally applies to springs, attach copy) x Approved Public Water (Submit the attached Water Availability Notification form completed by your water purveyor stating the system is capable of and will supply water.) Individual Well--attach copy of: 1) Well logs (If no well log report is on file,a 1 hr stabilization test may be substituted) 2) Lab analysis for water quality parameters tested within 3 years of application: -Total coliform -Nitrate-N -Chloride 3) Plot plan showing location of well with distances from proposed sewage system, buildings, driveways and surrounding properties. Two-party Well—items above AND recorded Operation&Maintenance agreement and recorded Easement. By signing the application form,the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees, representatives or agents for the purpose of application review and any required later inspections. Access and right of entry to the applicant's property or structure shall be requested and shall occur during regular business hours. Signature I �w Date FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 1) Water Right Permit# 2) Public Water Supply WS ID# In Compliance Yes No 3) Individual Well Driller Name Date Drilled Depth Production Meets Water Quality Standards Yes No WRIA 17 SIPZ Yes Circle: Coastal Moderate High No Subbasin Based upon information provided by the applicant, it appears that the potable water supply: meets conditionally meets does not meet the conditions of RCW 19.27.097 and the Guidelines for Determining Water Availability for New Buildings. Application Reviewed by Date Date Fee Receipt# Check# Case#BLD TILLMAN ENGINEERING, INC., PORT HADLOCK, WA • SOIL EVALUATION SOIL LOG REPORT > OS (C1V PROPERTY OWNER: RUTH BALDWIN LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 9 Township 29N Range 1E Parcel No. 921-094-001 D E C IEU n/7 IE Date Logged: MAR. 10, '03 Logged By: ERIC PAGE, P.E. 1 JUN 192012 j SOIL LOG #22 - S� 0 to 12 in. DARK BROWN LOAM JEFFERSON COUNTY 12 to 27 in. REDDISH BROWN SANDY LOAM DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - 27 to 35 in. TAN SANDY LOAM, DISTINCTLY MOTTLED Roots to: in. Moisture at: in. Water at: 35 in. Comments: SCUM LINE AT 25" ( t SOIL LOG #23 0 to 9 in. DARK BROWN LOAM 9 to 23 in. REDDISH BROWN SANDY LOAM 23 to 35 in. TAN SANDY LOAM, DISTINCTLY MOTTLED Roots to: in. Moisture at: in. Water at: 35 in. Comments: SCUM LINE AT 21" , ( eLq 1 ,)C57--)S C kgr2c k c.'ct — L.( -- a '�. i,T if---E f T'.,p, ° W E --------11 Et MAR 1 2 2003 ; J } DEN. Of„COMMON'l'T. DEVELOPMENT J Page 1 .N.,„,,,..., •----,...„_. -, • ,., _ _______ BALDWIN RD. p - - --- E7 i ? ..,, .,55 WI . ..., / .71 '-c ,Z 0 i ... _--... _...., ... 0 -"I - - , ,, -'-'7'.:77---- ------- , 0 (-1) 8 ........._ ......... . __ --. --.„. 8 -..,. ,.. ... --...._ ... ...,......, ),. 0 ,... r12 ,..„ , r ---- --- -1 . .. ,..„. --I.1 1 0. ---, --. - ----- -1.) - -1- 11 II li r--: -" -------'------------1------1-1 \ g I ,,. , ,-Th .., rq 0 z 0 ' 0 , 0 (4;:- --- L _ _ \ T C1 ) 0 z , \ ,,,, ,,,, U i , \ -. ' \\\ ,.... ...., -....., ...c__ NN-r... .„„ 1 Gil.' ..,..,,..... -..., -.,.. . 0 ....„ lil\k‘k\IVI -.-, 0 -----.. , — . -___. :><„ ---...._ ---.. ..----- --....„... ...--"" -..., --... 7 N.... . . / • / / / 0 / / / / I // 0 \ i ' 0 C3 ' / / -um i / .. /5 k.4 '.>'>' 4 7 "/7-) 0■. 2-7•• ItS 41 N Mk mE 5, • ° ...r.. . SCALE: 1" = JO' / -.., i M -). 1/ /II-- —N■ — / q L_____ .,\:/•. / v. ..._, .-- ,-,-, Ck.-7:7-------- ,--, .., / REVISIONS am RUTH BALDWIN 'TILLMAN -- a CA) SEPTIC SYSTEM RESERVE AREA SYSTEM PLAN ENGINEERING, INC. itrarMo c um tA li 1. PARCEL NO. 921-094-001 ne-aimen,31O-0,41111 MI _ _ ./ \.. . . . 63 TILLMAN ENGINEERING, INC., PORT HADLOCK,WA SOIL EVALUATION SOIL LOG REPORT [MAR 1 20:731t2 PROPERTY OWNER: RUTH BALDWIN g LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Section 9 Township 29N R9 y� Parcel No. 921-094-026 II T.OF COMtv��+�t� OE�[ PMENT Date Logged: MAR. 11, '03 Logged By: RYAN TILLMAN, P.E. _ . ERIC PAGE, P.E. SOIL LOG#1 Comments: ANTICIPATED RESTRICTIVE AT 29" cEovr . SOIL LOG #2 I , I if JUN 1 9 2012 Comments: ANTICIPATED RESTRICTIVE AT 2. i ( JEFFERSON COUNTY SOIL LOG#3 Dori.OF CCMM!IN!TY 'Comments: ANTICIPATED RESTRICTIVE AT 12" �� G •3O SOIL LOG #4 0 to 9 in. DARK BROWN LOAM 9 to 30 in. DARK REDDISH BROWN SANDY LOAM 30 to 45 in. TAN FINE LOAMY SAND,WEAKLY CEMENTED Roots to: 30 in. Moisture at: in. Water at: 45 in. r•Comments: SCUM LINE AT 24" SOIL LOG#5 0 to 8 in. DARK BROWN LOAM 8 to 36 in. REDDISH BROWN SANDY LOAM 36 to 51 in. TAN LOAMY SAND, DISTINCTLY MOTTLED,WEAKLY CEMENTED, SLIGHTLY COMPACTED Roots to: 40 in. ``� Moisture at: in. 1 Water at: in. l �� Comments: A-`36)G 3� Page 1 . TILLMAN ENGINEERING, INC., PORT HADLOCK, WA SOIL EVALUATION SOIL LOG#6 \ 1 �` 0 to 15 in. DARK BROWN LOAM IJ c 15 to 30 in. REDDISH BROWN SANDY LOAM 30 to 42 in. TAN FINE LOAMY SAND, WEAKLY CEMENTED, SLIGHTLY COMPACTED W 1 R 1 oots to: 35 in. I D E.° C 7. D 1]" Moisture at: in. Water at: 42 in. AT _ I 1 LIAR 1 2 2003 I i Comments: SCUM LINE AT 25" SOIL LOG#7 utNI. OF CUMMUN1 i%;OEVELOPMEN Comments: ANTICIPATED RESTRICTIVE AT 23" i' ; cv _.t I) SOIL LOG#8 0 to 8 in. DARK BROWN LOAM 8 to 18 in. REDDISH BROWN SANDY LOAM 18 to 26 in. REDDISH BROWN SANDY LOAM, MODERATELY MOTTLED 26 to 42 in. TAN FINE LOAMY SAND, WEAKLY CEMENTED . ,iV Roots to: 42 in. ' ... .„.<. Moisture at: in. \ Water at: in. Comments: SCUM LINE AT 26" Qc (SOIL LOG#9 ` 0 Cb to 7 in. DARK BROWN LOAM 7 to 27 in. REDDISH BROWN SANDY LOAM 27 to 34 in. REDDISH BROWN SANDY LOAM, FAINTLY MOTTLED • 34 to 40 in. TAN FINE LOAMY SAND, WEAKLY CEMENTED, HEAVILY `II`I, COMPACTED Roots to: 34 in. Moisture at: in. Water at: in. Comments: SCUM LINE AT 24" 11-(J r ,), SOIL LOG#10 Comments: ANTICIPATED RESTRICTIVE AT 18" ? t 6A 7 SOIL LOG#11 Comments: ANTICIPATED RESTRICTIVE AT 17" i) Page 2 • TILLMAN ENGINEERING, INC., PORT HADLOCK,WA SOIL EVALUATION SOIL LOG #12 Comments: ANTICIPATED RESTRICTIVE AT 15" \ I SOIL LOG #13 MAR 12 2003 II)/ Comments: ANTICIPATED RESTRICTIVE AT 18" • DEPT. OF COMM;iNiIY DEVELOPMENT 1SOIL LOG #14 (Comments: ANTICIPATED RESTRICTIVE AT 21" II SOIL LOG #15 Comments: ANTICIPATED RESTRICTIVE AT 21" <),(l SOIL LOG #16 Comments: ANTICIPATED RESTRICTIVE AT 16" T !SOIL LOG #17 (Comments: ANTICIPATED RESTRICTIVE AT 14" SOIL LOG #18 Comments: ANTICIPATED RESTRICTIVE AT 12" 1 ( \ ��J SOIL LOG#19 Comments: ANTICIPATED RESTRICTIVE AT 18" • SOIL LOG #20 Comments: ANTICIPATED RESTRICTIVE AT 20" l a Oj- Cpl SOIL LOG#21 Comments: ANTICIPATED RESTRICTIVE AT 18" } 1 C �, ;} Page 3 cow JEFFERSON COUNTY ti � •4 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPIVIENT CEOVr, i( 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend • Washington:9 368 li .1S NGtSO 360/379-4450 — 360/379-4451 Fax 11_ ! JUN 1 9 2012 ID il � IJEFFERSON COIJNTY Land Division Supplemental Application' OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MLA# t o- I 4 I PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: vi c.1 I Feytpberi r k Submittal Requirements r3 6 1. ✓A completed Master Permit Application and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist (if applicable). Representative authorization is required if application is not signed by owner. 2. Short Plat, Long Plat or Binding Site Plan application fee (as applicable), as set forth in the Jefferson County Fee Ordinance,as amended. 3. Any supplemental information identified by the Administrator. 4. Certificate of Water Supply Utility Service Form. 5. VFive (5) paper copies of a preliminary plat meeting the requirements of Jefferson County Code(JCC) 18.35.110 and 18.35.120 for short plats, or JCC 18.35.290 and 18.35.300 for long subdivisions/binding site plans and identifying points of access, all easements, deeds, restrictions, or other encumbrances restricting the use of the property, as applicable. Copies of the applicable JCC sections are attached for your use. 6. Where site conditions require a special report to assess or address any probable significant adverse environmental impacts, a study (or studies, as applicable) prepared by a competent professional may be required if deemed necessary by the Administrator. 7. Evidence of compliance with JCC 18.30.070, Stormwater Management Standards, as deemed necessary by the Administrator. 8. The preliminary plat must be prepared in accordance with JCC 18.35.110 for short plats, or 18.35.290 for long plats. The contents of the preliminary plat must provide the information listed in 18.35.120 for short plats and 18.35.300 for long plats. 9. The following supplemental information: Subdivision Name: ►+v(i,JfnC� ! -ogarboA t‘Acer Land Use(check one): 0 Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Industrial Total Acreage of Property: 111 3 If. 5 Total Lots Proposed: 3 Water Supply(check one): ❑ Individual Wells 1-Community Water System ?•J.D Sewage Disposal Method: 0 5 S Average Lot Size: t 1 •5 ac.s. Minimum Lot Size: t 0_0' Open Space: 1JJIY See JCC 18.35. Use this application for Preliminary Plats(short or long)and for Mixed Use,Commercial and Industrial Binding Site Plans:a separate application is available for Residential Binding Site Plans. G:1PermiECenter\###FORMS#14ADRD FORMS1Current DRD Forms land division app_FINAL.doc REV.12/31/2008 Page 1 10. I, MrcrR. MIAJ AQ--j , do hereby swear and certify that in addition to the land subject to this application(check the box below which applies): d I have no interest in ❑ I have an interest in land within 300 feet of any portion of the subject property by reason of ownership, contract for purchase by agreement or option by any person, family member, firm, or corporation in any manner connected with me or the development. 01/20/2 SIG •TURE DATE 11. The applicant hereby certifies that the preliminary plat provides an accurate representation of the proposed land division;and the applicant hereby acknowledges that any approval issued on this application may be revoked if any such statement is found to be false. SIGNATURE DATE it G:1PermitCenterl###FORMS#4#\DRD FORMS\Current DRD Eon Forrnskland division app_FINAL.doc REV.12/31/2008 Page 2 N. SCALE: 1" = 200' . III v) 2 m •.; :v,., ..,�._." .-� � WIN, 1320::• '..... i' -........... � :k , rt L N o °v u'o 3 0 c 0 1)' g'SI CO a. . /` �.` y........ N T m ,,, / . ,, ,.. .. ,/ ,..,....i, \ / to co ,r In \ \ ° o 4,\NI-- rrl p r-- z o , 7( Z 1,, 1 Ilk t 'z; 1 LT 20' EASEMENT / /� t / 0_,k,....-----. . ---. .� r i t a CO 0 w a(0 -►, v (I5 CI) CI u°s gliw Q v _ 3 t3 s F,,/ C�' -- v cite 0 A O W � '.; z O 3 r^ 3 F • • _ C REV6gNS DATE BY N b 5, RUTH BALDWIN "I'ILLIIIRN v N SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN SITE PLAN ENGINEERING, INC. Y PARCEL NO. 921-094-026 »PM MUM NM ~ 'un / `\ . SCALE: 1" = 3O / s / z p :n !ri O I) CD D o I m it , a 0 0 / 7 • y0 D 2 Fr, 4.z Rj W o 2 2 . P1 o i A 0 Z O m 0 I I x o I O -- -.. zm 2 rr r —i z c 141 0 O 1 3 R' —I rrnn ° 0 L._.. .._.. k m o RI chi rn Qt 2 z q 5? a ci O z 0 m m tn y b ° n 0 � 0 0 no m 0 0 r 0 0 cn D r" I 0 ■ ti cl 22 -0. 0 q tr2'�1 r�,� C.-'n 0 ® o m r I 0 ® v I r�- o a En 0 �a / r / I • o LP-) ,... 0 _________\....., N V ® G Q. I I N O ••'' = y 1 1 ® 1.1‘\\\\\\\\\\\\41\ r-i ,\ • g c-'› Si4/ / 0 E ,... 8 ,,,,,...4. ,,.. . V co r -a \"\I DATE 11 b l R RUTH BALDWIN TILLMAN . w SEPTIC SYSTEM DESIGN SYSTEM PLAN ENGINEERING. INC. CA 1 R ii ; PARCEL NO. 921-094-026 " � vi 3111-MO-MM.al-M-M0 MC / \ J ENVIRONMENTAL, ECOLOGICAL, HYDROGEOLOGY, AND SNR COMPANY ENGINEERING GEOLOGY CONSULTANTS Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report 91 Baldwin Road, Nordland, WA 98358 Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 Prepared for: Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson 6( 111 i y • a .1 � gyp. T .' �t � ," .. + 4p • _ Prepared by: SNR COMPANY 15211 3r°Place NE• DUVALL,WA 98019 425-788-3015.425-788-6873 (FAX) www.snrcompany.com August 25, 2011 Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Count Parcel Num.• :'21194026 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company I �I �� I� Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance-eport Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number 921094026 Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1.1 Property Description 1 0 1.2 Topography 1 1.3 Surface Water Hydrology 2 n 1.4 Hydrogeology 3 Y 1.5 Soils 4 -4 1.6 Vegetation 4 ^' 1.7 Findings and Conclusions 4 2 SITE DESCRIPTION 7 2.1 Site Location 7 2.2 Legal Description 9 2.2.1 Legal Description of Parcel 921094026 9 2.3 Topography 9 3 SOILS, GEOLOGY, AND HYDROGEOLOGY 16 3.1 Soils 16 3.1.1 Whidbey Soils Series 19 3.2 Geology 27 3.2.1 Regional Geology 27 3.2.2 Cascadia Subduction Zone 30 3.2.3 Local Geology 39 3.2.4 Geology of the Subject Property 52 3.3 Hydrogeology 54 3.3.1 Department of Ecology Well Logs 54 3.4 Surface Water Hydrology 81 4 WETLAND IDENTIFICATION AND DELINEATION 88 4.1 Research 89 4.1.1 WDFW SalmonScape Map 89 4.1.2 USFWS Wetland Inventory Map 91 4.1.3 Jefferson County Critical Areas Map 92 4.1.4 Jefferson County Code 94 4.2 Historical Overview of the Subject Property and Vicinity 95 4.2.1 History of Marrowstone Island 95 4.2.2 History of the Subject Property 97 4.3 Habitats 101 4.3.1 Aquatic 101 4.3.2 Terrestrial 101 4.3.3 Avian 102 4.3.4 TES, PHS, SOC, and State Heritage 103 4.4 Wetland Field Studies 103 4.4.1 March 15, 2011 Site Reconnaissance Activities 104 4.4.2 June 6,2011 Field Activities 107 August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company II I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Numbers: 921094026 TABLE 4-1 PARTIAL LISTING OF VEGETATION OBSERVED ON AND IN THE VICINITY OF THE SUBJECT nA F PROPERTY 112 5 LIMITATIONS 116 1- Z 6 FINDINGS 117 p v 7 CONCLUSIONS 119 REFERENCES 120 ATTACHMENT A — SITE MAP 126 a ATTACHMENT B — WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS 129 ATTACHMENT C — PHOTOGRAPHS 140 Table of Figures Figure 2-1 —Site Location Map from Google Maps,2011 7 Figure 2-2-Jefferson County GIS Parcel Map,Jefferson County Assessor,2011 8 Figure 2-3—PLSS Map from the National Resource Conservation Service(NRCS),2011 9 Figure 2-4—"DNR Stream Map"from Jefferson County GIS Services,2011 10 Figure 2-5-WDFW SalmonScape Map, 2011 11 Figure 2-6-1991 USGS Topographic Map from MRM, 2011 11 Figure 2-7—Jefferson County GIS Topographic Map with 10 Foot Contours, 2011 12 Figure 2-8—Jefferson County GIS Drainage Area and MS4 System that Discharges onto the Subject Property,201113 Figure 2-9-LiDAR Image of the Southwestern Portion of Marrowstone Island, 2011 14 Figure 2-10—June 20, 1990 USGS Air Photograph from Google Earth Professional, 2011 15 Figure 2-11 -March 13,2005 Air Photograph from Google Earth Professional, 2011 15 Figure 3-1 -NRCS Web Soil Survey Map of Subject Property,7/1/2011 17 Figure 3-2-NRCS Web Soil Survey Map Legend,7/1/2011 18 Figure 3-3—Approximate Location for the NRCS Type Area for Whidbey Soil Series, San Juan County,WA, NRCS Soil DataMart, 2011 22 Figure 3-4-Approximate Location for the NRCS Type Area for San Juan Soil Series, San Juan County,WA, NRCS Soil DataMart, 2011 26 Figure 3-5-Remaining Remnants of the Farallon Tectonic Plate, USGS 2011 28 Figure 3-6-Geologic history of Wisconsin,with emphasis on the Ice Age from Lee Clayton,John W.Attig, David M. Mickelson, Mark D.Johnson, and Kent M. Syverson, Educational Series 36,2006 29 Figure 3-7-Cascadia Subduction Zone-Ecology, 2008 30 Figure 3-8-Looking South at the Cascadia Subduction Zone and Accretionary Wedge 32 Figure 3-9-Ridges and Fracture Zones of the Cascadia Subduction Zone, USGS 2011 33 Figure 3-10- Puget Lowland Glacial Events,from Berger and Easterbrook, 1993 35 Figure 3-11 -USGS Holocene Fault Traces on Google Earth Professional,2010 40 Figure 3-12-Olympic Mountain Formation from Accretion of the Juan de Fuca Tectonic Plate under the North American Plate—Evergreen College, Field Trip Guide to Skokomish Basin, Olympic Mountains,2004 41 Figure 3-13-Olympic Subduction Complex from Evergreen College,2004 43 Figure 3-14-Figure Showing Glacial Features including Drumlins 45 Figure 3-15—From Bedrock Geologic Map of the Port Townsend 30-by 60-minute Quadrangle, Puget Sound Region, Washington, 1988 47 Figure 3-16-Legend for Bedrock Geologic Map of the Port Townsend 30-by 60-minute Quadrangle, Puget Sound Region,Washington, 1988 47 Figure 3-17—From the Surficial Geologic Map of the Port Townsend 30-by 60-minute Quadrangle, Puget Sound Region,Washington, USGS, 1989 48 August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland!dent cation an.Delineation and tream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson iii Nordland,WA Jefferson Coon Parcel Number 921094026 Figure 3-18—Legend for Surficial Geologic Map of the Port Townsend 30-by 60-minute Quadrangle, Puget Sound —I Region,Washington, USGS, 1989 48 a Figure 3-19- From the Geologic Map of Washington State, Northwest Quadrant, DNR,2002 49 Figure 3-20- Legend from the Geologic Map of Washington State, Northwest Quadrant, DNR, 2002 49 m Figure 3-21 —From the Geologic Map of East Jefferson County,Jefferson I.D.M.S., 1995 50 Figure 3-22—Legend from the Geologic Map of East Jefferson County,Jefferson I.D.M.S., 1995 50 Figure 3-23—From the Geologic Map from the Department of Ecology Water Supply Bulletin Number 59, 1994 51 Figure 3-24-Photograph of Bluff approximately 150 feet North of the Southeast Corner of the Subject Property, June c� 6, 2011 53 Z Figure 3-25—Approximate Water Well Locations near Subject Property,Google Earth 55 —I Figure 3-26-Boaz Well 56 "' Figure 3-27-Avery Well 57 Figure 3-28-Beam Well 58 v, Figure 3-29-Burroughs Well 59 Figure 3-30-Cilk Well 60 Figure 3-31 -Conley Well 61 Figure 3-32-Dellinger Well 62 Figure 3-33-Dillion Well 63 Figure 3-34-Tulkerson Well 64 Figure 3-35-Gorohamer Well 65 Figure 3-36-Hylen Well 66 Figure 3-37-Johnson Well 67 Figure 3-38-Justis Well 68 Figure 3-39-Kelly Well 69 Figure 3-40-Michelson Well 70 Figure 3-41 -Miller Well 71 Figure 3-42-Morrell-Robinson Well 72 Figure 3-43-Oestreich Well 73 Figure 3-44-Snelgrove Well 74 Figure 3-45-Stevens Well 75 Figure 3-46-Swartz Well 76 Figure 3-47-Taylor Well 77 Figure 3-48-Thompson Well 78 Figure 3-49-Avery Well 79 Figure 3-50-Wright Well 80 Figure 3-51 -Weather History from May 28-June 6,2011 from Weather Underground,2011 82 Figure 3-52-Weather History from March 5-15, 2011 from Weather Underground,2011 83 Figure 3-53—Photograph of Storm Water in Municipal Roadside Ditch that Bounds the North Side of Disney Road on March 15,2011 84 Figure 3-54—Photograph of Disney Road Roadside Ditch Diversion onto Private Property with Pond on March 15, 2011 84 Figure 3-55—Photograph of Roadside Ditch on Disney Road During Initial Rainfall on March 15, 2011 85 Figure 3-56—Photograph of Roadside Ditch Storm Water Diverted to Private Pond on March 15,2011 -Note Frothing 86 Figure 3-57—Photograph of Outflow of Storm Water from Pond on Private Property and Storm Water in Ditch entering Culvert under Disney Road on March 15, 2011 86 Figure 3-58—Photograph of Roadside Ditch Stormwater Diverted onto Subject Property on March 15,2011 —Note Frothing 87 Figure 4-1 -WDFW SalmonScape Map of Subject Property and Vicinity,2011 90 Figure 4-2-Jefferson County Critical Areas Map Showing Wetlands and Streams,Jefferson County GIS,2011 90 Figure 4-3-USFWS National Wetlands Inventory Map of Subject Property and Vicinity, 2010 92 Figure 4-4—Jefferson County Critical Areas Map Showing Wetlands and Streams, Jefferson County GIS,2011 93 Figure 4-5—Photograph of Trees on Subject Property in early 1990s(believed to be 1991) 97 August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company iv I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Numbers: 921094026 Figure 4-6—Photograph of Trees partly Removed and Stockpiles are Present(believed to be around 1993) 98 CO Figure 4-7-Trees Gone in Later Photograph(believed to be 1993) 98 z Figure 4-8-June 6,2011 Photograph of area where Trees were Removed in 1993 99 &L, Figure 4-9-June 20, 1990 Air Photograph Showing Forested Area and Drainage, Google 99 Figure 4-10- March 13, 2005 Air Photograph Showing Change in Forested Area and Drainage,Google 100 Figure 4-11 -Weather for Marrowstone Island,WA from Weather Underground-- March 5—15,2011 105 Figure 4-12—Photograph Looking Southeast from Disney Road on March 15, 2011 106 Figure 4-13—Photograph Looking East from southeast corner of Single Story Residence built in 2004 on March 15, c 2011 106 Figure 4-14—Weather for Marrowstone Island,WA from Weather Underground—May 28—June 6,2011 107 Figure 4-15-Transect Map for Studies Conducted on and in the Immediate Vicinity of the Subject Property on June 6, m 2011 108 Figure 4-16-Transect Map for Studies Conducted in the Vicinity of the Subject Property on June 6,2011 108 Figure 4-17—Photograph of Bluff Face in the Southeastern Portion of the Subject Property on June 6,2011 109 Figure 4-18—Photograph of Solution Cavity Collapse Induced Mass Wasting Near the Disney Road Stairway to the Beach on June 6, 2011 110 Figure 4-19—Photograph of Clayey Silt on Beach Area on June 6,2011 110 Figure 4-20—Photograph of Sample Plot 2 in the Northeastern portion of the Subject Property near the Shrub and Tree Debris"Compost Mound"on June 6, 2011 111 Figure 4-21 —Photograph of Vegetation in the Vicinity of Sample Plot 4 on June 6, 2011 112 August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 1 Wetland Identification and Delineation and tream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 'I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY z his executive summary provides an overview of the site characteristics, the studies that were conducted, and the 2 endings and conclusions made by SNR. However, the entire document must be reviewed to allow the reviewer to y Iroperly understand how these studies were conducted, what the research has indicated, and how the findings and onclusions were made by SNR. - .1 Property Description w he Marc Mauney Lynne Rogerson property(subject property) is located in the southeastern portion of Marrowstone ▪ sland, in unincorporated Jefferson County, east of Port Hadlock — Irondale and Indian Island (Figure 2-1 — Site w ocation Map from Google Maps, 2011). This property has a Jefferson County parcel number of 921094026 and a nited States Postal Service (USPS) address of 91 Baldwin Road, Nordland, WA (Figure 2-2 — Jefferson County •arcel Map, Jefferson County Assessor, 2011). The subject property is approximately 33.5 acres in size and is •eveloped with two single family residences and other improvements. The single family residence located in the southwestern portion of the subject property was constructed in 1900 and the single family residence in the northwestern portion of the subject property was constructed in 2004. The subject property is accessed by the gravel paved Baldwin Road, a southern "extension" of East Marrowstone Road. Based on Assessor parcel maps, Baldwin Road is a municipal right-of-way(a county road). The subject property is located in the SE quarter of section 9, township 29N and range 1 E (Figure 2-3 — PLSS Map from the National Resource Conservation Service - NRCS) of the Public Land Survey System (PLSS) maps. The northwest corner of the subject property,which is the southeast corner of Baldwin Road and Disney Road, is located at approximately 48.016008° Latitude and -122.680962° Longitude at an elevation of approximately 87 feet above sea level (ASL). Based on the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan zoning map, the subject property is currently zoned 1 DU per 20 acres, the Jefferson County Assessor land use code for the subject property is 1100 - Houses (single units, non-farm). 1.2 Topography The subject property has moderate topographic relief, dipping to the southeast(at an approximate, generalized 5.5% dip to the southeast). The topographic relief can have a greater dip on a smaller scale because of the local generalized geomorphology of this area which suggests that the subject property is located on the southeast side of a Vashon age drumlin in a series of northwest to southeast orientated drumlins located in this portion of the Puget Lowlands. The surface water drainage on the subject property is generally to the east,with localized trends to the southeast. The regional drainage on Marrowstone Island is controlled by the Island topography, which is controlled by what appear to be relict glacial drumlins that generally form a central axis on the Island. These drumlin features create drainage divides that result in drainage in all directions with most drainage being to the 9 9 9 9 east and west of the drumlin features(due to their linear orientation of northwest to southeast). The Jefferson County "DNR Stream Map"from the Jefferson County GIS services (Figure 2-4) suggests that there are only a few seasonal streams on Marrowstone Island that have mouths emptying into the Puget Sound (to Admiralty Inlet and other inlets and bays). August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report 2 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number: 921094026 This map and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) SalmonScape map (Figure 2-5) suggest tha ^' three seasonal streams may have mouths at Kinney Point, emptying into Oak Bay, with these streams general) m draining south. The location and source of the headwaters for these streams is unknown. The hydrology of these c streams is also unknown. SNR found no Jefferson County, WDFW, USGS, or other maps that suggest any stream- _1 are located on the subject property or in the drainage basin the subject property is located in. 1.3 Surface Water Hydrology CA SNR's surface water hydrology studies include regional surface water studies to allow SNR to evaluate the effect' C surface water hydrology have on the area being studied, especially where surface water has been channelized. Additionally, in some cases the existing surface water hydrology that is observed may be influenced by histori. drainage ditches, irrigation ditches, stormwater ditches (conveyances), and historic logging drainage ditches (ant logging roads), which artificially influence the surface water hydrology. Historic ground disturbing activities, such a' 99� 9 ) Y • Y 9Y• 9 9 logging activities, agricultural activities, and generalized clearing activities (common is shoreline areas to maintai views) often block natural drainage and in some cases this was intentional, usually to detain surface water collected from larger areas that are drained to a steeper sloped area. If significant amounts of diverted surface water flows wer: allowed to run down steep slopes,slope erosion will occur,as could down slope flooding. Also, this area of the Olympic Peninsula is in the rain shadow,which means that the annual precipitation is much less than other areas of Western Washington and it means that during the summer months any crops that are planted will typically require irrigation. On Marrowstone Island, the source of irrigation would be a water well or an irrigation ditch system that has a source of stored surface water for use during the summer dry months. There is no evidence of historic reservoirs or agricultural ponds on or in the immediate vicinity of the subject property so it is assumed that the irrigation was provided by the onsite well. SNR's field studies focus on the surface water hydrology on and in the vicinity of the subject property to identify potential sources of wetland and stream hydrology (surface water hydrology will only create wetland hydrology if the ground water is already at or very close to the surface or if unique topographic and geologic conditions are present). SNR's field activities and research include fluvial geomorphologic, surface water hydrology, stratigraphy, structural geology, geomorphology, and hydrogeologic studies to identify the sources of surface water and to identify and describe potential stream headwaters where possible. The subject property does have storm water from a municipal roadside ditch system diverted into the northern and western portions. The storm water diverted into the northern portion of the subject property enters a manmade drainage ditch presumed to be excavated with a backhoe or trackhoe. The excavated soils (spoils) were apparently placed on the west side of the ditch which was somewhat shortsighted because this blocked natural ephemeral surface water flows from reaching the natural ephemeral drainage channel the ditch was apparently excavated in and has resulted in upgradient ponding to the west of this ditch (and is apparently why "lateral" manmade ditches have been excavated in problematic areas,where ponding still occurs even after these ditches were excavated). The municipal stormwater system in the vicinity of the subject property does not have any apparent stormwater treatment facilities located in the drainage basin that drains onto the subject property, even though this storm water includes runoff from significant road surfaces. Although Jefferson County does not have an NPDES Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit,the County must, at a minimum, meet the requirements of the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, Ecology,2005 for stormwater facilities, including roadside ditch systems. August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company 3 Wetland Identification and Delineation and tream Reconnaissance-eport Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 a- he County must also meet the water quality requirements of the Water Quality Act of 1987(33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq.), cc :nd Chapter 173-201A WAC-Water quality standards for surface waters of the state of Washington, and Chapter 173- a a '04 WAC - Sediment management standards, and Chapter 173-220 WAC - National pollutant discharge elimination .ystem permit program;and,the requirements of the Clean Water Act per 40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter D. y t is unclear why Jefferson County is diverting storm water onto the subject property without apparent easements or w unicipal conveyances (or other storm water facilities). However, if Jefferson County is required to obtain a Phase II unicipal Stormwater NPDES permit this could be problematic, because the County would be required to maintain ontrol of its storm water to the outfall (or transfer this storm water to a co-permittee, secondary permittee, or C•2 •overnment entity) and this outfall is on the subject property, approximately 1,200 feet south of where the culvert K .ischarges the storm water onto the subject property. W he diversion of this storm water onto the subject property and the manmade stormwater ditch is impacting the surface ater hydrology of the subject property as is the diversion of storm water from the roadside ditch on the western side of :aldwin Road which enters the subject property via a culvert under Baldwin Road. Additionally, based on observations of the stormwater flows in the roadside ditch system that bound the north side of Disney Road, the west side of East Marrowstone Road, and both sides of Robbins Road, the water quality of this storm water may not meet federal and state requirements. 1.4 Hydrogeology Most the well logs for the water wells located in the immediate vicinity of the subject property appear to be relatively consistent with the 9 eologic maps for the subject property and vicinity, indicating that glacial till material is the dominant surface deposit in this portion of Marrowstone Island. However, the well logs also suggest that at surface or near surface clay deposits are also relatively common in this area. What are less common are the deposits seen on the subject property, primarily because none of the wells were located in the relict glacial meltwater channel; however,the Miller well log(for a property on Disney Road)does describe the upper recessional outwash deposits identified by SNR on the subject property. Unfortunately the well log for the water well on the subject property is not in the Ecology well log database, perhaps because this well is old enough to not have required a drillers permit. It is known that the well on the subject property is currently in use and that it apparently has elevated levels of chloride, suggesting that the well is pumping a mixture of fresh and marine water in a mixing zone(this may be sea water intrusion or natural mixing depending on the aquifer characteristics and depth). It should be noted that the well logs typically describe glacial till as"hardpan"and "gravel, sand, and clay". None of the well logs studied describe finding water bearing material near the surface, with the shallowest water found at approximately 42 feet below the ground surface and ground water typically being encountered approximately 70- 110 feet below the ground surface. The well logs suggest that in most cases the wells were completed in what appear to be advance outwash deposits that underlie the glacial till surface materials (however, some wells may actually be screened in older recessional outwash deposits based on the well log description of the water bearing materials). The geologic maps suggest that advance outwash deposits underlie the glacial till which is common in Puget Lowland continental glacial deposits. Advance outwash deposits are generally the most productive ground water bearing materials in this area. In some areas it appears that older glacial deposits(recessional outwash)are the primary aquifer materials that produce ground water. August 25,2011 Copyright e 2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report 4 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number: 921094026 Based on field studies and well logs, there is no evidence that near surface ground water is present beneath tho m subject property or anywhere else in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. However, the subject property H located in a Salt Water Intrusion Protection Zone(SWIPZ),which means that any new well development on the subjec' property would be restricted. Fortunately, the Jefferson County PUD #1 brought municipal water supplies t. Marrowstone Island (including the subject property) which means that if future development is planned, the required water supplies will be available. r^ cn Because there is no evidence of near surface ground water being present on or in the immediate vicinity of the subjeci � property and because of the topography and surface geology, saturated soil conditions cannot develop on the subje 3 property. 1.5 Soils As previously discussed,the geologic maps suggest that the deposits on the subject property are glacial till or outwash deposits(advance or recessional)that are Quaternary age(which can be Vashon or Sumas Stade deposits). The soi survey suggests San Juan soils may be present; however,the deposits SNR observed on the subject property appea to have been deposited by water, possibly recessional outwash fluvial deltaic deposition. In most cases the mineral soil was covered with a thin organic layer of grass derived litter,duff,and humus. In general what SNR observed was an organic layer (1 — 3 inches) overlying a mineral soil that has a high mafic (basalt — andesite)content, with a relatively thin "A" soil horizon (10—12 inches), a moderate "B"soil horizon of approximately 10—12 inches, and a relatively thin"C"soil horizon of generally less than 8 inches in thickness,were present. These soils were underlain by recessional outwash and glacial till parent materials. None of the soils observed exhibited hydric soil characteristics. 1.6 Vegetation The vegetation observed on the subject property varies significantly from the forested areas in the northwestern and northeastern portions of the subject property and the"prairie like"clear cut"grassland"that covers most of the eastern portion of the subject property. The northwestern forested area has vegetation commonly found in upland forests, including the conifers and hardwoods found throughout the Puget Lowlands, such as western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), red alder (Alnus rubra), and occasional big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), and western red cedar (Thuja plicata) was observed. Salal (Gaultheda shallon) and western sword fern(Polystichum munitum)were the dominant understory vegetation observed during field activities. As previously discussed the eastern portion of the subject property has some shrubs, but most of these are either Rubus or Rosa species. Surprisingly, reed canarygrass is not the dominant grass throughout this area, with other species,such as Festuca,Poa, and Lolium species often being the dominant grass species. 1.7 Findings and Conclusions SNR's research and field studies conducted on and in the vicinity of the subject property strongly suggests that there are no wetland areas present on or in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. Although there are minor areas where ephemeral surface water ponding does occur, this is primarily due to the excavation of a stormwater drainage ditch on the subject property to handle municipal point source storm water diverted onto the subject property. Saturated soil conditions were not identified to be present in any sample plot nor is this likely, based on the hydrology observed on the bluff faces that are downgradient of the entire subject property, because no ground water was observed as seeps anywhere along the bluffs or in any of these test pits nor did the soils observed in any test pits exhibit hydric soil characteristics. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 5 Wetland Identlficabon and Delineation and beam•econnaissance•eport Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 a- ith the exception of the Jefferson County critical areas map (which is exactly the same as the USFWS National °C etlands Inventory maps) and the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory maps, none of the references reviewed by NR, including the WDFW SalmonScape maps, geologic maps, well logs, and recent and historic USGS topographic aps suggest that potential wetlands or streams are present on the subject property. cn he subject property does have"manmade"surface water issues. It receives surface water from at least two"off-site" w .ources from the Jefferson County municipal separate storm sewer system (from the north and west). To address the unicipal storm water diverted onto the subject property from the culvert under Disney Road (which, according to evin Miller, Disney Road is a private road), a drainage ditch was excavated in the early 1990s apparently by the c' •roperty owners. W K owever, instead of placing the removed soils on the down slope side of this ditch, the backhoe operator placed them W •n the upslope side of the ditch, preventing natural ephemeral drainage (and municipal storm water diverted onto the .ubject property from the west)from reaching the low point in this ephemeral drainage system, which causes localized -phemeral ponding. It is unclear why Jefferson County chose to divert the municipal storm water onto the private property to the east and southeast when the County could have simply extended the roadside ditch on the west side of East Marrowstone Road to the south on the west side of Baldwin Road (a county road) and eventually tightline this storm water to discharge onto the shoreline to the south. It is also unclear why there are no storm county owned water detention facilities utilized in this municipal separate storm sewer system (or other water quality protection systems based on the observations made by SNR that suggest the water quality of the storm water may not meet federal and state water quality requirements). Because the subject property has been cleared historically and reforestation has not occurred it has the properties of a prairie, with the vegetation in this area being mostly seasonal grasses that are dormant from late fall to early spring, which means evapotranspiration potential is minimal to non-existent. Although the soils observed by SNR will have moderate to high hydraulic conductivity, the slope on the subject property is steep enough that when significant precipitation events occur, surface water flows will be generated. These "natural" ephemeral surface water flows, combined with the storm water diverted onto the subject property from the west, encounter the disturbed topography and soil barriers placed when the drainage ditch was excavated to cause minor ephemeral ponding. None of these areas have the characteristics of wetland hydrology and none have near surface ground water present(there was no ground water observed in any test pits or anywhere on the bluff faces bounding the eastern portion of the subject property at depths of up to 15 feet below the ground surface). As discussed in this report, the soils on the subject property are 30 inches or less in depth and are believed to be formed in glacial recessional outwash deposits. These soils have relatively high hydraulic conductivity above the glacial lodgment till underlying these materials. No cemented glacial till was observed in the test pits excavated in the eastern portion of the subject property; however, cemented glacial till was observed at a depth of approximately 2 -5 feet below the ground surface on the bluff face along the eastern property boundary. Minor unsaturated zone preferential flow was observed in some of the test pits at the soil—parent material contact where the sand become more consolidated because the soil has a higher hydraulic conductivity than the parent material and because the subject property has a moderate slope to the east,southeast. None of the soils observed on the bluff faces or in the test pits exhibited hydric soil characteristics,which supports the observations that ground water was not present in any of the test pits nor has near surface ground water been present in these soils long enough for hydric soils to develop. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Ides cation and Deineation and Stream Reconnaissance Repoli 6 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number: 921094026 Although most of the vegetation described for the sample plots on the Wetland Delineation Forms presented i r^ Attachment B would be considered to be wetland vegetation per the Corps guidance documents, the majority of thi• m vegetation is facultative (FAC) grasses that do not have physiological adaptations for life in saturated (and reducing soil conditions. In fact, none of the FAC and FACW vegetation observed on the subject property had observabl_ physiological adaptations for life in saturated soil conditions, even under magnification. This strongly suggests that . prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions does not exist on the subject property. r^ Based on SNR's field studies and research, NO wetland areas were observed and are not present on the subjec c property. Based on SNR's research and field studies, there are no ratable wetland areas located on or within 300 feet of th_ subject property.Additionally,there were no naturally occurring critical areas streams observed on or within 300 feet o' �o the subject property. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and (ream Reconnaissance'eport 7 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number:921094026 o ' SITE DESCRIPTION ~d he Marc Mauney Lynne Rogerson property (subject property) is located in the southeastern portion of Marrowstone sland, in unincorporated Jefferson County, east of Port Hadlock - Irondale and Indian Island (Figure 2-1 - Site C43 ocation Map from Google Maps, 2011). This property has a Jefferson County parcel number of 921094026 and a W nited States Postal Service (USPS) address of 91 Baldwin Road, Nordland, WA (Figure 2-2 - Jefferson County c 'arcel Map, Jefferson County Assessor, 2011). The subject property is approximately 33.5 acres in size and is 11+ Ieveloped with two single family residences and other improvements. The single family residence located in the ~ •outhwestern portion of the subject property was constructed in 1900 and the single family residence in the co orthwestern portion of the subject property was constructed in 2004. The subject property is accessed by the gravel .aved Baldwin Road, a southern "extension" of East Marrowstone Road. Based on Assessor parcel maps, Baldwin 'oad is a municipal right-of-way(a county road). -"t e r ‘ 01 r r s r Mr ® t .. 2 .,d• r ul d \ ....... 4 /• »a..- I • © �... rIi 66.-0 o a I % -rr r v ! ® 4 \ �' UBJECT PROPERTY 1r' f Figure 2.1-Site Location Map from Google Maps,2011 2.1 Site Location The subject property is located in the SE quarter of section 9, township 29N and range 1E (Figure 2-3- PLSS Map from the National Resource Conservation Service - NRCS) of the Public Land Survey System (PLSS) maps. The northwest comer of the subject property,which is the southeast corner of Baldwin Road and Disney Road, is located at approximately 48.016008° Latitude and -122.680962° Longitude at an elevation of approximately 87 feet above sea level (ASL). Based on the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan zoning map, the subject property is currently zoned 1 DU per 20 acres, the Jefferson County Assessor land use code for the subject property is 1100 - Houses (single units, non-farm). August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 8 Marc Manuney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 The subject property is located in the southeastern portion of Marrowstone Island, approximately 1,850 feet southwes ti of Liplip Point and 3,000 feet northeast of Kinney Point; it has approximately 915 feet of shoreline on Admiralty Inlel 1 (Puget Sound). The forested areas on the subject property have mostly been cleared, leaving approximately 6.3 acre- m of conifer/hardwood forest in the northwestern and northeastern corners of the subject property. There is a relativel 0 large, manmade municipal stormwater conveyance system that enters the subject property from the north, passin6 c„ through the central portion of the property to discharge to shoreline area near the southeast corner. n z s tg"!'"! 0 = =In esesu I ,} ice■ - tom._ ti`_ ----- �LLLlylyly} ,_ , L_ r ,ras,x� �i -,-- . _ I clam • ca j a asrmr amcw � , r � , , . 1/ HAMM ti �1 , ' ; .. f I "- fo l il I v s ii -i•Oy ] 1tjaS11 ifikin%�.w. .r�wo...w.sm Figure 2.2•Jefferson County GIS Parcel Map,Jefferson County Assessor,2011 The subject property is located at the drainage point of one of the largest drainage areas on Marrowstone Island (approximately 150 acres), receiving storm water from a municipal roadside ditch system that collects drainage from municipal roads and the east and south flanks of what appears to be a relict glacial drumlin feature. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 9 Wetland Identification and Delineation an. earn•econnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number.921094026 z his storm water enters a municipal roadside ditch municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) on the north side of ° Disney Road for approximately 660 feet before it enters a culvert under Disney Road, discharging this storm water into ~a : manmade ditch system on the subject property. The soils removed from the ditch excavation activities appear to — ave been placed on the west side of this manmade MS4 conveyance, creating a "dike" which has impacted the cc c) .urface water hydrology on the subject property. In an attempt to address this, lateral ditches were excavated west of W :nd through the "dike" in an attempt to drain surface water that can impound behind the"dike" that was created when in he MS4 conveyance through the subject property was excavated. y1� Cr i" it a N, ♦' Y l �i`� �' ;ffY-' ,?,1''''.1?1 1, J' (rat r wr='iv G`�•..:.-�,,y,-'r. :..!.r„iYr� .�i)r „V*.d Af / ..'�>` .•'.'" �_4,,. . G.•Y+p. j, , r ..1 t J / 11'4. .Sl + ±µ: f�'• 4 � Y / Yi H T r ?• ;}§ r • Si x'F£.y �r,• S ^r .t E wv . 1' 5 v�` :- • ' - 1 ,,,,,, .„ . . ,,,,, , ,....,4 4 , i,WA f p p. ft. , to, ‘ AN,.,,,,, 3 r �� 4` 1 ... . .. .! •a e., t,E0 T 29N,0 9.r'.E t. y �, r r ?r�y .t ,c�,. �t ' ,;'*. . :., Y. x', NI t-` l� .ter ` ' ,o'er ydi ..• H +� � �a f.•r }d itt___,__ZA _@1i4l- ."∎1}ASi.i .a�� vecnNPS,-D'j.;LD;,r,.!ner.2011 ©" Figure 2-3-PLSS Map from the National Resource Conservation Service(NRCS),2011 2.2 Legal Description SNR obtained the legal description for the subject property from the Jefferson County Assessor's database. This legal description may differ from the actual recorded legal description: 2. 2. 1 Legal Description of Parcel 921094026 S9 T29 R1 E i LOT 1 SUBJ TO EASE 2.3 Topography The subject property has moderate topographic relief, dipping to the southeast(at an approximate, generalized 5.5% dip to the southeast). The topographic relief can have a greater dip on a smaller scale because of the local generalized geomorphology of this area which suggests that the subject property is located on the southeast side of a Vashon age drumlin in a series of northwest to southeast orientated drumlins located in this portion of the Puget Lowlands. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report 10 Marc Manuney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number. 921094026 The surface water drainage on the subject property is generally to the east, with localized trends to the southeast. Th: o) regional drainage on Marrowstone Island is controlled by the Island topography, which is controlled by what appear t• -' be relict glacial drumlins that generally form a central axis on the Island. T These drumlin features create drainage divides that result in drainage in all directions with most drainage being to the r„ east and west of the drumlin features (due to their linear orientation of northwest to southeast). The Jefferson Count rt' "DNR Stream Map"from the Jefferson County GIS services (Figure 2-4) suggests that there are only a few seasona streams on Marrowstone Island that have mouths emptying into the Puget Sound (to Admiralty Inlet and other inles: and bays). -I This map and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) SalmonScape map (Figure 2-5) suggest tha three seasonal streams may have mouths at Kinney Point, emptying into Oak Bay, with these streams generall draining south. The location and source of the headwaters for these streams is unknown. The hydrology of thes: streams is also unknown. SNR found no Jefferson County, WDFW, USGS, or other maps that suggest any stream- are located on the subject property or in the drainage basin the subject property is located in. l Y • LAND 31 03 32 33 O l 'A l p I 00, l tI}J SCOW SAY _ N LIP trAPPROXIMATE LOCATION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY IP it 111 b FROM JEFFERSON COUNTY GIS SERVICES.2011 NO SCALE Figure 2-4-"DNR Stream Map"from Jefferson County GIS Services,2011 SNR reviewed several topographic maps and Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) images that include the subject property and vicinity. The topographic resolution of these maps varies from 25 foot contours(Figure 2-6-1991 USGS Topographic Map from MRM, 2011) to 10 foot contours (Jefferson County topographic maps). The Jefferson County topographic maps, based on LiDAR imagery (Figure 2-7- Jefferson County Topographic Map with 10 Foot Contours) have the highest level of topographic resolution SNR was able to obtain; however,this is still relatively low topographic resolution for identifying localized drainage and depressional features. August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company 11 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number.921094026 O 1T Y o*t ■ V h li 'Y,.e._ E talik \ ,-,.. 4 ' ..yam �`'. ~ \ a ■ -19 4 x4 -le 24 ar.' , I fit Cill, \ / 1 FROM THE WPFV1 3A,MCNSCAPE.2011 Figure 2.5-WDFW SalmonScape Map,2011 :;\t 4 ,II : 0, 1h —\ „ NoQON Po1nt 0`- SCOW BAY / q, :, : , , / 1 , \q . J .\ . l I t 1 1, i \IL_.t 1 i i 2 ';1 �'>, L,8 Mue t 1 �. . / �,• ,SLOJECT PROPERTY j rC '" ` i . ) r A v °b f !1 i ���.i q WptlR Pain l \ � ;'\VA 16 /.-" -....-. ,b et >(, -Kinney Point �' 0 NO SCALE 1991 USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP FROM MRM,2011 Nm Figure 2-6-1991 USGS Topographic Map from MRM,2011 August 25,2011 Copynght©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report 12 Marc Manuney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number 921094026 Due to the lack of high resolution topographic maps (FEMA minimum requirement is 2 foot contour intervals); a ' accurate interpretation of the localized surface water hydrology is difficult. High resolution topographic maps a = -I generally required to interpret minor changes in local topography,which can be used to identify potential depressiona r" areas in sloped topography. v m It should be noted that in addition to storm water from the north side of Robbins Road and the west side of Eas " n Marrowstone Road entering the subject property via the roadside ditch on the north side of Disney Road; the MS' 20 roadside ditch on the south side of Robbins Road, enters the roadside ditch on the west side of Baldwin Road. Thies ; stormwater flows to the south until in enters a culvert under Baldwin Road, that discharges this storm water into th_ -I northwestern portion of the subject property(into the forested area). The drainage area and the MS4 drainage syste o are shown in Figure 2-8. It should be noted that according to the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan(Stormwater),all storm water in easter Jefferson County is infiltrated except the Port Hadlock area. However, there are no observed municipal infiltratio facilities in the drainage area where the subject property is located,except for a small pond area on a property located immediately north of the subject property, and where roadside ditch water is diverted to this pond which outfalls to th: culvert that crosses under Disney Road and discharges to the MS4 system on the subject property. k' ri -- .::., • l @ 1 k I.,~ 1, ,UT. D �- L .,� moor i it # c�7 S ;j "�# .�� IITMOA i y -. y o :=7:i 7":''''''",o. 'i ‘l 7 v ,w / .d . .r 1 a ), _.„...... ririm t 6'..... » ..r 4 . — 4 wa Il �a.ov rs —\ e i. b ! � o I.w \ rAw�v rrQ �� *N"' "4". 1 rwn, ,,, wig i - t # \ll.....7_ _ 111 . 16, � rim rtlr rrwr i I w t► �` , I , % S 1l3JECT PROPFPTY A Figure 2-7-Jefferson County GIS Topographic Map with 10 Foot Contours,2011 August 25,2011 Copyright 02011 SNR Company 13 Wetland Identification and Delineation and Cream Reconnaissance•eport Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number:921094026 z he LiDAR image of the southeastern portion of Marrowstone Island suggests that a relict Vashon age glacial ° eltwater channel may have flowed around the northern portion of the southern drumlin and trended southeast ~n. hrough the subject property (Figure 2-9 — LIDAR Image of the Southwestern Portion of Marrowstone Island). This cc elict meltwater channel may have affected the surface geology of this area by covering glacial till deposits with alluvial c, .ands and gravels deposited by this relict surface water feature. This may have led to delta fan deposition to the east, CI' .outheast of the subject property(cla s are observed on the beach adjacent to the subject property). Y)1.„ o he surface deposits on the drumlin to the west are anticipated to be lodgment till, which can have relatively low F ydraulic conductivity on steeper slopes in shallow soils. In deeper soils, the hydraulic conductivity can be higher at y .epths of up to 5 feet below the ground surface where these soils typically have sharp contacts with the glacial till •arent materials. These conditions can be conducive to unsaturated zone preferential flows along the parent material .urface. ... . j w,,.,cu..°.ay.' mwm,_:.. a' 1,,.,. 1 (^-..- n t ,. M54 3Y5TEM�,a amuo / V•TZJ•1 I i • vn.mn y�lV j 'n = t`APPROXIMATE APE/V OF �P./`,Irsb1GE 3AEIN _ I �`k"' -�r . 1 y .1 „ f t.g4-7, is C • Vl } w.a .. ,,, ' 1,.,.7. , ,,,e''..1:, , jor .f... DRAINAGE FE','�IL PE rmm SJOJEC•PROPERTY / rlil0lA rY1tllD C wxi t memo 1 I/ , h LL✓✓/ ! V_ ,f I 4 z—.sue : x�..,..,.......,.o-.a.—w "''FROM JEFFERSON COUNTY GIS SERVICES,2011 ,_ Figure 2-8—Jefferson County GIS Drainage Area and MS4 System that Discharges onto the Subject Property,2011 August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identificafion and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report 14 Marc Manuney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number 921094026 It is unclear why the municipal storm water in this drainage area is diverted onto the subject property; however, it i- 4 clear that this diversion is affecting the surface water hydrology of the eastern portion of the subject property fo —1 several reasons, including the design of the unlined ditch that is used to convey the point source MS4 stormwater, I" because the soils removed from this ditch were placed on the upslope side of the ditch which blocks normal surfac: 0 water drainage from draining to the topographic low point where the ditch was excavated. This has resulted in the r„ impoundment of surface water drainage which is why lateral surface water drainage ditches were excavated. A- n previously discussed, storm water from the roadside ditch on the west side of Baldwin Road is diverted into this are and is part of the surface water flow that is impounded behind the "dike' created by the placement of the excavat-. 1 soils on the upslope side of this MS4 stormwater ditch. — 0 S Z 1 I " - I -- . . RELICT GLACIAL METLWATER FLOW? i , 4 ,,ifoifilit :.,' r 400,4 UBJECT PROPERTY t.,J� ,�rs ;.1 ±+rief.. • M54 at r i , r * NO S�,i.LE ^E r'UGET 50UNO LIDAR CONSORTIUM,2011 Figure 2-9-LiDAR Image of the Southwestern Portion of Marrowstone Island,2011 August25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company 15 Wetland Men cation an, Demeahon an. tream•econnaissance'eport Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number:921094026 z he LiDAR image in Figure 2-9 clearly shows the manmade stormwater ditch that was excavated across the subject ° •roperty from the north to the south. It should be noted that in 1990, this ditch system passed through forested areas s Figure 2-10 —June 20, 1990 USGS Air Photograph from Google Earth Professional) that were apparently clear cut - -ometime before 2005 (Figure 2-11 —March 13, 2005 Air Photograph from Google Earth Professional), (the earliest air C.1 Ihotograph showing the forested area missing), W 4 1 r "w I- i , PITCH Y ( NOTE FOES ,--- —>.. ' _i a 1; :? . lRM..... on1oGoogle- Figure 2.10-June 20, 1990 USGS Air Photograph from Google Earth Professional,2011 • UI3JECT PROPER I I - . Pi:. ORESTED AREA GONE R . I -_ 11 M I 1 Ri Ip of P.�xn Re Norn _,. r y L ¢ i I e e mu oronw.e oamoGooYle III id Figure 2-11 -March 13,2005 Air Photograph from Google Earth Professional,2011 August 25,2011 Copyright Cr 2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 16 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number 921094026 C/7 3 SOILS , GEOLOGY , AND HYDROGEOLOGY o Before conducting field activities, SNR Company conducts research to allow SNR's field geologists and wetland y professionals to determine if the site conditions observed during field activities are similar to those suggested to be ' present on the National Resource Conservation Services (NRCS) soils maps, the United States Geological Survey G, (USGS),and the Washington State Department of Natural Resources(DNR) geologic maps for the area being studied. o The research SNR conducts prior to the field studies being conducted on the subject property included a review of the United States Department of Agriculture NRCS Web Soil Survey (http://websoilsurvev.nres.usda.gov/app/) map of the subject property, and all available geologic maps. -< This research also included the review of the Jefferson County Sensitive Areas map for the subject property and xr. vicinity,the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Wetlands Inventory maps,the Washington Department of Fish and Z Wildlife SalmonScape maps, historic air photographs from Google Earth Professional, Microsoft Research Maps (and air photographs), geologic and soils related literature published for the area where the subject property is located, and = any previous wetland, geologic, or soils studies that may have been conducted on or in the vicinity of the subject o property that SNR was able to obtain. The soils, geology, hydrogeology, geomorphology, and surface water hydrology of a site are integral for determining if c� wetland areas and streams are present and to determine if natural conditions exist on the site. The use of these maps o and other references also provides SNR with a better understanding of the depositional environments and the hydrogeology and surface water hydrology of the study area. 3.1 Soils The NRCS Web Soil Survey Map for the subject property (Figures 3-1 and 3-2 — NRCS Web Soil Survey Map and Legend) suggests that two soil types are present on the subject property, Whidbey gravelly sandy loam (WhC) and San Juan gravelly sandy loam(SaB). The NRCS suggests that the Whidbey soil series soils are loamy-skeletal, isotic, mesic aquic dystroxerepts (in the Inceptsol suborder) that are moderately deep to densic contact, moderately well drained soils formed in glacial drift overlying dense glaciomarine deposits. The NRCS suggests that the San Juan soil are sandy, isotic, mesic pachic ultic haploxerolls (in the Mollisol suborder) that are very deep, somewhat excessively drained soils formed in eolian sands(deposited by wind)over glacial outwash. The Official NRCS description for these soils also suggests that the depositional environment for these two soil types is very different,with the Whidbey soil series being formed in Vashon age deposits and the San Juan series being formed in Holocene beach sands deposited on outwash deposits (most likely recessional outwash deposits). SNR's field studies do not agree with soil series the NRCS suggests are present on the subject property based on observations made in the sample plot excavations,the geologic test pits,and the observations made of the bluff along the shoreline. As discussed later in this section, the soils formed in the upper deposits generally have some of the characteristics of the San Juan soil series and, where present the deeper soils more closely resemble Alderwood soil series, formed in glacial till deposits. The soils observed by SNR were typical of those formed in relatively low energy, glacial recessional outwash deposits derived from the extrusive volcanic materials normally found in the Puget Lowlands. These parent materials are derived primarily from two types of volcanic material, the older basalts (including those derived from the Olympic alpine glacial ice sheet) and the younger tectonic margin andesites and other extrusive volcanic materials associated with subduction zone volcanism. August 25,2011 Copynght 0 2011 SNR Company 17 Wetland'den•cation and Delineation and tream econnaissance-eport Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number: 921094026 >- The edifices of virtually all Cascade volcanoes are primarily andesite, which, along with the older basalts, are also cs present in the Olympic Range and foothills, and have very dark Munsell soil colors naturally (as the parent material). —+ Additionally, the primary extrusive volcanic material in Jefferson County is basalt. These materials approach the color of"black"on the Munsell color chart for soils(10YR 2/1)as unaltered extrusive volcanic rock. As sedimentary deposits c-' (parent materials), these materials tend to be a very dark brown (10YR 3/2) when moist and a grayish brown (10YR x 5/2)color when they are dry. •erg Af� oit I r° %,ft Q . .. 't .�* # i •• ?• . 't SUBJECT PROPERTY i E•t O • } �•' }r•, py 1 W i)'. ! .Ctili C7 f 74 . 1•�7 1 .� � V) •°,1, J �Y� �.. • r • Figure 3-1 -NRCS Web Soil Survey Map of Subject Property,711/2011 It should be noted that the NRCS soils maps are created at a scale of 1:24,000 and most of the mapping is based on remote sensing data and other references. Each 1:24,000 map does include some ground "proofing" to provide additional data, but this ground proofing is limited,with most of the map interpretation being based on other information (such as air photographs, USGS geologic and topographic maps(with 25 foot contours),and satellite data). However, these maps were prepared primarily for agricultural purposes and the soil types described are based on specific sites where the official soil series was described in the field. These locations can be located significant distances from the area that SNR is currently studying. Geologists know that sedimentary deposits (parent materials) can vary significantly even in a small depositional area, especially if there are local geomorphologic and topographic controls present. The soils SNR observed on the subject property were formed in what appear to be well sorted outwash sands(in some areas these are pebbly to gravelly) overlying glacial lodgment till; however; in some areas the outwash sands are overlain with poorer sorted pebbly sands that appear to have developed cross-bedding. Further north, the outwash sands thin out to less than a foot thick and are overlain with varying thicknesses of the pebbly poorly sorted sands; if this trend continues to the north, it is anticipated that the surface deposits will be glacial lodgment till. In general the gravelly outwash sands range from 2—5 feet thick in the bluff section immediately east of the subject property and the overlying poorly sorted pebbly sands range from 2—4 feet thick. August 25,2011 Copynghtm 2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 113 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 Map Unit Legend Jefferson County Area,Washington iYVA631) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AO1 Percent of AO1 AgB Agnew silt loam,0 to 8 percent slopes 0.6 0.5% m Co Coastal beaches 4.9 4.5% r Inc Indianola loamy sand.0 to 15 percent 2.3 2.1% slopes IoC Indianola sandy loam,0 to 15 percent 1.2 1.1% -< slopes Ro Rough broken land 0.5 0.4% Sa8 San Juan gravelly sandy loam.0 to 8 17.9 16.3% percent slopes WhC Whidbey gravelly sandy loam.010 15 56.3 51 3% _ percent slopes WhD Whidbey gravelly sandy loam. 15 to 30 0.1 0 1% percent slopes Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 83.7 76.3% 0 Totals for Area of Interest 109.7 100.0% 0 Figure 3.2•NRCS Web Soil Survey Map Legend,7/112011 0 The soils that form in the deposits observed on the subject property are relatively shallow and range in depth between c, 24 — 30 inches. There is very little leaf litter present; however, there is a moderate 0 soil horizon which is mostly "< composed of decomposing grasses. The surface soils have been significantly disturbed by historic plowing or disking creating an uneven, hummocky ground surface. There are fill areas on the site, primarily in the eastern portions of the subject property where forested areas were cleared since 1990. Based on communications with a long term resident, of approximately 25 years, (Kevin Miller, personal communications, 2011), the shrubs and tree limbs from the forest clearing were buried in "compost mounds" in the northeastern portion of the subject property (SNR noticed these mounds during the June 6, 2011 field studies). The soil formed in the well sorted sand (occasionally with small rounded to subrounded pebbles) does have some resemblance to the deeper, better sorted gravelly sand. However, the depositional environment is believed to be different and the soils observed are generally lighter in color than those described in the official San Juan soil series soil description. Based on field observations and the geologic maps for this area, it is believed that all of the soils SNR observed in the sample plots formed in recessional outwash deposits and it appears that the near surface deposits (within 10 feet of the ground surface) are generally recessional outwash deposits that overlay glacial lodgment till. What is somewhat unusual about the underlying glacial lodgment till is that it appears to have inclusions of siliceous material that has some resemblance to the concretions found at Nodule Point on Marrowstone Island; however, because of the high silica content of these inclusions, they apparently "dissolve" in the marine wave action and infiltrating surface water,creating"solution cavities"in the glacial lodgment till that apparently hastens bluff erosion. What is also interesting is that there is no evidence of any ground water flow on any of the bluff face areas observed along the eastern portion of the subject property,even at the basal contact with what appears to be clay underlying the glacial till materials(based on the apparent presence of clays in the beach area to the east). August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 19 Wetland Identification and Delineation an. tream'econnaissance' .ort Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number: 921094026 > 3. 1 . 1 Whidbey Soils Series � II o As previously discussed, the NRCS suggests that the Whidbey gravelly sandy loam soil series are present on the subject property and that these soils consist of moderately deep to densic contact, moderately well drained soils "' formed in glacial drift overlying dense glaciomarine deposits. cz 0 The Geologic Map of Eastern Jefferson County, revised February 21, 1995 and the Washington State Department of s o Ecology Geologic Map for Marrowstone Island (Water Supply Bulletin 59, 1981) suggests that the surface geology on >- the subject property is Vashon age recessional outwash deposits and advance outwash deposits; however, the = Geologic Map of Washington State, Northwest Quadrant, DNR, 2002 suggests that the only deposit on the subject property is glacial lodgment till. Q However, SNR's field studies strongly suggest that the parent materials on the subject property are most likely recessional outwash deposits overlying glacial lodgment till deposits, which correlates with the geomorphology of the CD subject property and vicinity. These deposits have relatively high hydraulic conductivity and based on field observations do not have any potential aquitards present within the upper 5 feet(at a minimum). 0 W The subject property has an average slope of at least 5%to the southeast,which suggests that perched ground water CD conditions would not exist even if a potential aquitard were present and observations of the bluffs on the eastern y boundary of the property,which are also the topographic low areas of the subject property,did not suggest that ground water is present above sea level beneath the subject property. This strongly suggests that near surface ground water 0 conditions do not exist. y As previously stated, the soils SNR observed on the subject property do not closely resemble the Whidbey soil series soils, which the NRCS originally identified in 1950. The soils SNR observed on the subject property more closely resemble the San Juan soil series; however, the depositional environments are apparently different as are the soil colors report for the San Juan soil series(the San Juan soil series are described as being darker than those observed by SNR in the field). However, SNR has included the official NRCS soil description for the Whidbey soils for comparison to those soils observed by SNR. The approximate location of the Whidbey soil series type location in San Juan County is shown in Figure 3-3-Approximate Location for the NRCS Type Area for Whidbey Soils, San Juan County,WA. The following is verbatim from the NRCS Whidbey Soil Series description: 3.1.1.1 Whidbey Soil Series LOCATION WHIDBEY WA Established Series Rev. MPR/EED/SBC 07/2007 WHIDBEY SERIES The Whidbey series consists of moderately deep to densic contact, moderately well drained soils formed in glacial drift overlying dense glaciomarine deposits. Whidbey soils are on hillslopes of glacial drift plains at elevations 0 to 90 meters. Slopes are 0 to 45 percent. Mean annual precipitation is about 610 mm. Mean annual temperature is about 9 degrees C. TAXONOMIC CLASS: Loamy-skeletal, isotic, mesic Aquic Dystroxerepts August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 20 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number. 921094026 TYPICAL PEDON: Whidbey gravelly loam, forested, on a northwest facing sideslope at 76 meters elevation. When described on August 16, 2005 the soil was dry throughout. (Colors are for dry soil unless otherwise noted.) vu Oi--0 to 5 cm;slightly decomposed plant material; abrupt smooth boundary. G7 A--5 to 15 cm; brown (10YR 5/3) gravelly loam, dark brown (10YR 3/3) moist; moderate r„ fine subangular blocky structure; soft, very friable, nonsticky, nonplastic; common very fine, many fine, and few medium and coarse roots; many very fine and fine irregular o pores; 15 percent gravel and 10 percent cobbles; moderately acid (pH 5.7); clear wavy boundary.(5 to 20 cm thick) -< Bw--15 to 51 cm; pale brown (10YR 6/3) very gravelly sandy loam, brown (10YR 5/3) moist; weak fine subangular blocky structure; soft, very friable, nonsticky, nonplastic; z common very fine, fine, and medium and few coarse roots; common very fine and fine r interstitial and irregular pores; 45 percent gravel and 5 percent cobbles; moderately acid (pH 5.7);clear wavy boundary. (25 to 60 cm thick) Bg--51 to 94 cm; pale brown (10YR 6/3) very gravelly sandy loam, brown (10YR 5/3) moist; moderate fine subangular blocky structure; slightly hard, friable, nonsticky, 70 nonplastic; few very fine and fine roots between peds; common very fine and fine interstitial and irregular pores; common distinct weakly cemented light gray (10YR7/2), rn light brownish gray (10YR 6/2) moist, iron depletions in matrix; many distinct weakly cemented brownish yellow(10YR6/6), yellowish brown (10YR 5/6) moist, ironmanganese masses in matrix; 45 percent gravel and 5 percent cobbles; slightly acid (pH 6.2); abrupt wavy boundary.(10 to 40 cm thick) -< 2Cd--94 to 152 cm; light olive brown (2.5Y 5/3) gravelly sandy loam, olive brown (2.5Y 4/3) moist; massive; hard, firm, nonsticky, nonplastic; few very fine irregular pores; common distinct weakly cemented brownish yellow (10YR 6/6), yellowish brown (10YR 5/6) moist, iron-manganese masses in matrix; common distinct weakly cemented light gray (10YR 7/2), light brownish gray (10YR 6/2) moist, iron depletions in matrix; 25 percent gravel; neutral(pH 6.9). TYPE LOCATION: San Juan County, Washington; Section 23, T.35N., R.2W. Willamette Meridian; USGS Shaw Island, Washington quadrangle; lat. 48 degrees 30 minutes 49 seconds N.and long. 122 degrees 54 minutes 6 seconds W. RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Depths to diagnostic horizons and features start from the mineral soil surface. Mean annual soil temperature- 10 to 11 degrees C Depth to redoximorphic features-46 to 75 cm Depth to densic contact-50 to 100 cm Reaction-moderately acid to neutral Particle-size control section: Clay content-4 to 18 percent Rock fragments-35 to 70 percent gravel and 0 to 20 percent cobbles A horizon Hue- 10YR or 7.5YR Value-2 or 3 moist,4 or 5 dry August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 21 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 } CD Chroma-2 or 3 moist and dry J l Rock fragments-0 to 15 percent Bw horizon Hue 10YR, 7.5YR or 2.5Y c Value-3 to5moist,4to6dry } Chroma-3 or 4 moist and dry Texture- L, SL, COSL Clay content-4 to 15 percent Rock fragments-35 to 70 percent gravel and 0 to 20 percent cobbles cBg horizon o Hue 10YR or 2.5Y Value-4 or 5 moist, 5 or 6 dry Chroma-3 or 4 moist and dry n, Texture-SL, LS J Clay content-5 to 18 percent co Rock fragments-35 to 70 percent gravel 0 to 10 percent cobbles Cd horizon Hue 10YR, 2.5Y or 5Y Value-4 to 6 moist,5 to 7 dry Chroma-2 or 3 moist and dry Texture-SL, SCL, COSL Clay content-9 to 24 percent Rock fragments- 10 to 50 percent gravel and 0 to 10 percent cobbles COMPETING SERIES: There are no competing series in this family. GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: Whidbey soils are on hillslopes of glacial drift plains. Slopes range from 0 to 45 percent. These soils are formed in glacial drift overlying dense glaciomarine deposits. Elevations are from 0 to about 100 meters. These soils occur in a mild marine climate with warm dry summers and mild wet winters. Mean annual precipitation is about 457 to 762 mm, most of which falls as rain in the late fall, winter and early spring. Mean annual temperature is about 9 degrees C. The frost-free period is about 200-240 days. GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: These are the Hoypus, Keystone, and Sholander soils. Keystone soils are found on glacial outwash plains, kames, kettles, and moraines. Keystone soils do not have a densic contact or redoximorphic features above 150 cm. Sholander, and Hoypus soils are on similar landscape positions. Sholander soils are sandy and have redoximorphic features at 20 to 46 cm. Hoypus soils do not have a densic contact or redoximorphic features above 150 cm. DRAINAGE AND SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY: Moderately well drained. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 22 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 Saturated hydraulic conductivity is high to very high in the Bw and Bg horizons, and very low in the Cd horizon. Whidbey soils have a perched water table as high as 46 cm during January, February, November, and December. rn USE AND VEGETATION: Whidbey soils are used for timber production, wildlife habitat, forage crop production, and livestock grazing. Potential natural vegetation is Douglas-fir; madrone, lodgepole pine, oceanspray, baldhip rose, salal, Cascade Oregongrape, o rattlesnake plantain,and bracken fern. 0 DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: Northwestern Washington. Series is of moderate extent. MLRA SOIL SURVEY REGIONAL OFFICE (MO)RESPONSIBLE: Portland, Oregon SERIES ESTABLISHED: Island County, Washington, 1950. z REMARKS: Diagnostic horizons and features recognized in this pedon include: Ochric epipedon Cambic horizon -the zone from 15 to 51 cm, Densic contact-94 cm.(upper boundary of Cd horizon) 70 Particle-size control section-25 to 94 cm (to the Cd horizon) �+ m Depth to redoximorphic features with chroma of 2 or less-51 cm This revision (6/2006) includes a new type location. The classification has not changed. The new typical pedon does not have an albic horizon. �+ • PPROXIMATE TYPE LOCATION F0' HIDBEY 50IL5 .1111011r • hN� ¶ Ara a'. ROM THE NEC,SOIL DATAMARI.2011 Figure 3-3-Approximate Location for the NRCS Type Area for Whidbey Soil Series,San Juan County,WA,NRCS Soil DataMart,2011 August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 23 Wetland Identification and Delineation and tream Reconnaissance'eport Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA efferson Coun Parcel Number. 921094026 >- As previously discussed, the relatively sorted sandy loam (which is occasionally pebbly to gravelly) formed in what o appears to be recessional outwash deposits SNR observed on the subject property has some similarities to the San J Juan soils described in the NRCS official soil series description. However,there are fewer similarities with the current r,°, official soil series description of the San Juan series soils than there are with Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, co Washington, McCreary, Soil Conservation Service, 1975. The Soil Survey suggests that San Juan soils are formed in ce recessional outwash deposits; however, the official soil series description below suggests that these soils formed in ° "beach sand dunes"which does not appear to coincide with what SNR observed in the field(the soils SNR observed in r = the field appear to have been deposited by flowing water, not wind or wave action). What is also curious is that the ° original San Juan soil series description in the Jefferson County Soil Survey was conducted in a type area located in z the northeastern portion of the Port Townsend area, the current San Juan soil series description is located near a American Camp in the southern portion of San Juan Island in San Juan County (Figure 3-4 — Current NRCS Type > Location for the San Juan Soil Series). c 3.1.1.2 San Juan Soil Series o The following is the NRCS official soil series description for the San Juan series soils, verbatim: LOCATION SAN JUAN WA "' Established Series J Rev,TMR/MPR/SBC CI) 05/2006 SAN JUAN SERIES The San Juan series consists of very deep,somewhat excessively drained soils formed in eolian sands over glacial outwash. San Juan soils are on dunes, hillslopes, and glacial outwash plains with slopes of 0 to 60 percent. Average annual precipitation is about 20 inches and average annual air temperature is about 50 degrees F. TAXONOMIC CLASS: Sandy,isotic, mesic Pachic Ultic Haploxerolls TYPICAL PEDON: San Juan sandy loam rangeland, on a south facing glacial outwash plain with a slope of 3 percent and elevation of 65 feet. When described on October 22, 2003 the soil was moist to 10 inches and dry below. Colors are for moist soil unless otherwise noted. A1--0 to 4 inches; black (10YR 2/1) sandy loam, dark gray (10YR 4/1) dry; weak fine granular structure; soft, very friable, non-sticky and non-plastic; many very fine and fine roots; many very fine and fine irregular pores; strongly acid (pH 5.1); abrupt smooth boundary. (4 to 8 inches thick) A2--4 to 13 inches; black (10YR 2/1) sandy loam, dark gray (10YR 4/1) dry; moderate medium subangular blocky structure; soft, very friable, non-sticky and non-plastic; many very fine and fine roots; many very fine and fine irregular pores; 5 percent fine gravel; moderately acid(pH 5.8);abrupt smooth boundary. (8 to 12 inches thick) A3--13 to 19 inches; black (10YR 2/1) sandy loam, dark gray (10YR 4/1) dry; moderate medium subangular blocky structure; soft, very friable, non-sticky and non-plastic; common very fine and fine roots; many very fine and fine irregular pores; 5 percent fine gravel;slightly acid(pH 6.4);clear wavy boundary. (6 to 10 inches thick) August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 24 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number. 921094026 Co, Bw--19 to 27 inches; very dark brown (10YR 2/2) gravelly loamy coarse sand, brown (10YR 4/3) dry; weak medium subangular blocky structure; soft, very friable, non-sticky and non-plastic; few very fine roots; many very fine and fine interstitial pores; 30 percent gravel;slightly acid (pH 6.5);clear wavy boundary. (4 to 10 inches thick) C1--27 to 41 inches; very gravelly coarse sand, variegated parent material colors, 40 percent dark, 40 percent light, and 20 percent intermediate mineral colors; single grain; loose, non-sticky and non-plastic; few very fine roots; many very fine and fine interstitial pores; 55 percent gravel;neutral(pH 6.8);clear wavy boundary.(4 to 18 inches thick) C2--41 to 62 inches;extremely gravelly coarse sand, variegated parent material colors,40 -< percent dark, 40 percent light, and 20 percent intermediate mineral colors; single grain; loose, non-sticky and nonplastic; many very fine and fine interstitial pores; 75 percent gravel and 5 percent cobbles; neutral(pH 6.7);clear wavy boundary.(4 to 24 inches thick) C3--62 to 70 inches;extremely gravelly coarse sand, variegated parent material colors,40 percent dark, 40 percent light, and 20 percent intermediate mineral colors; single grain; loose, non-sticky and nonplastic; many very fine and fine interstitial pores; 75 percent gravel; neutral(pH 6.9). (0 to 12 inches thick) TYPE LOCATION: San Juan County, Washington, about 5 miles south of the town of Friday Harbor on American Camp portion of San Juan Island National Historical Park; m about 590 feet south and 2,000 feet west of the northeast corner of Section 12, T. 34 N., R. 3 W. Willamette Baseline Meridian; USGS False Bay NE quarter quadrangle; Latitude 48 degrees 27 minutes and 43 seconds North, Longitude 123 degrees 0 minutes and 14 seconds West. e RANGE IN CHARACTERISTICS: Depths to diagnostic horizons and features start from the mineral soil surface. Average annual soil temperature-50 to 54 degrees F. Soil moisture control section-dry 75 to 90 days following summer solstice Mollic epipedon thickness-20 to 32 inches Base saturation by ammonium acetate-greater than 50 percent within the epipedon Base saturation by sum of cations-less than 75 percent from 10 to 30 inches Volcanic glass-less than 5 percent throughout Particle size control section: Clay Content-0 to 12 percent Rock fragments -0 to 35 percent in the A2 and A3 horizons, 15 to 60 percent in the Bw horizon, and 35 to 85 percent in the C horizons with a weighted average between 15 and 35 percent Al horizon Value-2 or 3 moist,3 or 4 dry Chroma-1 or 2 moist and dry Clay content-5 to 12 percent Rock fragments-0 to 15 percent gravel A2 and A3 horizons Value-2 or 3 moist,3 or 4 dry August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company " I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 r CO Chroma- 1 or 2 moist and dry 0 Reaction-moderately acid or slightly acid ° W Texture- SL, L,or LS Clay content-2 to 12 percent Rock fragments-0 to 35 percent gravel, 0 to 5 percent cobbles, 0 to 35 percent total >- Bw horizon x Hue-10YR or 7.5YR Value-2 or 3 moist, 3 or 4 dry Chroma- 1 to 3 moist and dry Reaction-slightly acid or moderately acid ° Texture- LCOS, SL,or LS ° Clay content-0 to 8 percent CD Rock fragments- 15 to 60 percent gravel, 0 to 5 percent cobbles, 15 to 60 percent total co C horizons J — Hue-2.5Y or variegated mineral colors o v) Value-3 or 4 moist,4 or 5 dry Chroma-2 or 3 moist and dry Reaction-slightly acid or neutral Texture-COS, LS, or LCOS Clay content-0 to 5 percent Rock fragments-35 to 80 percent gravel, 0 to 15 percent cobbles,35 to 85 percent total COMPETING SERIES: There are no competing series in this family. GEOGRAPHIC SETTING: San Juan soils are on dunes, hillslopes, and glacial outwash plains with slopes of 0 to 60 percent and elevations from 0 to about 300 feet. These soils formed in eolian sands over glacial outwash. The maritime climate is characterized by warm dry summers and mild moist winters. Average annual precipitation is 18 to 30 inches.Average annual temperature is 48 to 50 degrees F. The frost-free period is 200 to 240 days. GEOGRAPHICALLY ASSOCIATED SOILS: These are the Ebeys, Hoypus, Keystone, Pilepoint, and Snakelum soils, all of which also occur on hillslopes and glacial outwash plains. Ebeys soils are formed entirely in well sorted eolian and glacial outwash sands with no appreciable gravel or cobbles. Hoypus soils lack a mollic epipedon and have a sandy-skeletal particle-size control section. Keystone soils lack a mollic epipedon and are formed in well sorted eolian and glacial outwash sands with no appreciable gravel or cobbles. Pilepoint soils have an argillic horizon, are 20 to 40 inches to a densic contact, and have redoximorphic features at 20 to 40 inches. Snakelum soils are not pachic and formed in dense stratified glacial outwash and drift. DRAINAGE AND SATURATED HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY: Somewhat excessively drained. Saturated hydraulic conductivity is high to very high through the profile. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report 26 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 C13 USE AND VEGETATION: Mainly used for wildlife habitat, pasture, and hay. Potential D natural vegetation may include an overstory of scattered Oregon white oak and Douglas- 1— fir but is primarily prairie vegetation including Roemers fescue, western brackenfem, rn baldhip rose, common snowberry, and trailing blackberry. o DISTRIBUTION AND EXTENT: Northwest Washington; MLRA 2, Northern part. Series is of small extent. o MLRA SOIL SURVEY REGIONAL OFFICE(MO) RESPONSIBLE: Portland, Oregon o SERIES ESTABLISHED: 1910 Reconnaissance survey of the western part of Puget 0 Sound Basin, Washington. REMARKS: Diagnostic horizons and features recognized in this pedon include: a z Mollic epipedon-0 to 27 inches(Al,A2,A3, and Bw horizons) D Particle-size control section-the zone from 10 to 40 inches = Base saturation by sum of cations-less than 30 percent from 10 to 30 inches -<D xi ADDITIONAL DATA: Characterization pedon sampled at the type location, NSSL pedon number 04N0409. Reference sample, NSSL pedon number 03N0239 0 r„ D r 1 D 0 APPROXIMATE 1YPE LOCA TION FO' T „ �'' ' SAN JUAN SOILS X 7y . �dry 1S`N" 6ir _, _ .'d s 4 F1, Mr y i d3 n 'TU�y ?j ,.. ` Yh4, ` ti,l{ P A ae fr. r1' d 7, g" .. f- FITOM THE NRCS SOIL OATAMART,2011 Figure 3.4-Approximate Location for the NRCS Type Area for San Juan Soil Series,San Juan County,WA,NRCS Soil DataMeart,2011 The San Juan soil series were initially identified by the Soil Conservation Service in 1910 and this soil series has apparently only had minor changes (including type area and depositional environment) since this initial identification, even though the geologic maps of this area have changed significantly since 1910. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 27 Wetland Identification and Delineation and tream•econnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number: 921094026 a- Regardless, as previously discussed, the soils SNR observed on the subject property do not closely resemble the o Whidbey series soils and do resemble the San Juan series soils described in the 1975 Jefferson County soil survey to some extent. The soils SNR observed in the sample plots and on the bluff face appear to have been formed in Vashon us age or possibly Sumas Stade recessional glacial outwash deposits. 0 3.2 Geology cc c SNR reviewed the available geologic maps and references for the area where the subject property is located, including } the Geologic Map of Eastern Jefferson County, Jefferson I.D.M.S., February 21, 1995; the Geologic Map of Washington–Northwest Quadrant, DNR, 2002; and the Department of Ecology Water Supply Bulletin Number 59, z Geology, Water Resources, and Seawater Intrusion Assessment of Marrowstone Island, Jefferson County, a Washington, Sinclair and Garrigues, 1994 for a generalized interpretation of the geology on and in the vicinity of the a subject property in addition to reviewing well logs from the Washington State Department of Ecology. o 3. 2. 1 Regional Geology J o The subject property is located on Marrowstone Island, east of Port Hadlock at the base of the eastern Olympic W co Mountain foothills, in the northwestern portion of the Puget Lowlands region of Washington State. This area is in the marginal Puget Lowlands area, which generally extends to elevations of up to 3,280 feet ASL, depending on the `1' thickness of the Puget Lobe glacial ice sheet in this area (which could be considerably thicker because Marrowstone — Island is near the divergence of the Juan de Fuca lobe and the Puget lobe; it could also be influenced by the Olympic y Mountain alpine glaciers. It should be noted that the Puget Lowlands are generally defined by the area covered by the Vashon glacial continental ice sheet Puget Lobe, which is estimated to have been approximately 1 kilometer thick above the modern day City of Seattle and to have extended as far south as 15 miles south of the modem day City of Olympia, in the "Puget Basin". Like much of Western Washington, Marrowstone Island has been shaped by the tectonic (subduction zone tectonics) forces and historic continental glaciation which created the modern day landforms seen today. The tectonic history of Western Washington has by far had the most profound effect on the geomorphology, geology, and climate than any other "recent" geologic events (Cenozoic Era). However, the tectonic history of the Cascadia subduction zone began during the Mesozoic Era, in the late Jurassic period as the"Super Continent", Pangaea began breaking up, forming "new" tectonic plates, including the Farallon tectonic plate, which subducted under the North American Plate along the western portions of what became North America (at the time, the subduction was occurring near where modern day Utah is located). Over time (several million years), most of the Farallon tectonic plate had completely subducted under the North American Plate, leaving only a few remnants in the northern portions of the plate, today. These remnants are called the Juan de Fuca, Explorer and Gorda Plates (Figure 3-5–Remaining Remnants of the Farallon Tectonic Plate), with the Juan de Fuca tectonic plate being the primary subducting plate responsible for the tectonic activity in the Puget Lowlands and the rest of Westem Washington. August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 28 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 In general, all three tectonic plates are responsible for the Cascade Volcanism and the formation of the Cascade and co, Coastal ranges that extend north from Northern California to the southern portions of western British Columbia. The Juan de Fuca tectonic plate is also believed to be responsible for the formation of the Olympic Mountains in Western to Washington, with some geologists believing that this is an accretionary feature combined with volcanism (they believe • that materials on the Juan de Fuca tectonic plate were "scraped off" as the plate subducted beneath the North American tectonic plate). These geologists believe that the rocks of the Olympic Subduction Complex were first thrust o above sea level about 12 million years ago and accretion and uplift presently outpace erosion in some parts of the 1— range and so the Olympic Mountains are still rising (Thackray and Pazzaglia, 1994). ° Seismicity < 0 o a li ' 1 128 125 122 1190 116 D .1•. .NORMMEAICA f.. A.'8RmT15 1 COLIAd=. d = * p• 'l • rn 45 I, JUAN DE FUCA 393 i c. T� .•'4�ti' ° PLATE '�'• ,..� D ' • F • A• OREGON 0 • • _•\° • a 4,3 PACIFIC • PLATE •Q , 41k• 0 oD r' 'W•+D k. GALI u- I A 0.1 NEVADA• GORDA t+ 1 , a �_- i '�. . {k. •"•Q id •PLATE CaPP: yl Sd' ' . . . o Mendocino rn `T�~�°ij q'�-• -y' 4 ' 39 qtr^. •ti '"f S.t • I ' 0 200 Kilometers mowed ban Wearer and ehadock,1999 Figure 3-5-Remaining Remnants of the Farallon Tectonic Plate,USGS 2011 Although the evolution of the Olympic Mountains and the Cascade Range are important "artifacts" of the Cascadia subduction zone, there are many other features that are caused by this tectonic activity, including the folding and faulting that accompanies this type of activity and generates less profound geomorphologic and geologic features that also have a significant impact on the topography of the Puget Lowlands, especially when these features are modified by continental and alpine glaciation that has occurred in the Puget Lowlands for the last 80,000 to 50,000 years (the Puget Lowlands are in the western margins of the Cordilleran glaciations that extended into what is now the continental United States). These glacial events are associated with worldwide Pleistocene period glacial events that occurred in the northern hemisphere, with those entering the continental United States beginning in the Wisconsin age(Figure 3-6 — Geologic history of Wisconsin, with emphasis on the Ice Age from Lee Clayton, John W. Attig, David M. Mickelson, Mark D. Johnson, and Kent M. Syverson, Educational Series 36, 2006). The following sub-sections of this report provide a more detailed explanation of the geologic processes that have occurred in Western Washington. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 29 I Weiland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 i Years Major geologic events CD Years Years aelore in Wisconsin o before before preset dunng past 25.000 years J present Geobgio.ome terms present Glaciations - S.Wes, N.Wis.-- o , i Holocene E . W -- 10.000-1 1 � 10.000- C7 �: 5X0- c p moist 0 25.000" moos m dry ce 5 o o moist O E o ›' crI t: 10.000- __----_ C 130,000- c i? i '— 130-3.1 1( f---�" mlg < �7 w o ` Z G S Two Creeks 7800004 . interval C7 I ' o / 1100.1:130: --1 ,.,00.000- I c-----) o e :.+00.003- w 3400.000- 1 Early ei c C7 5.200.000- I -- > I Miocene Epoch 74.000,000 t.1- _I I a Oligocene Epoch C J MI Eocene Epoch 15,000- t r y1 Paleocene Epoch ? e e- 13 88.000.000 y ` ui Cretaceous Period ., n la a Jurassic Period �3 e Triassic Period �' - .x- G --- 250.000.000 - -- Permian Period c O 0 Pennsylvanian Penod m • e Mississippian Period ; w Devonian Period e Q Silurian Period 20,000- Ordovician Period 570.000,000 Cambrian Period X71-?----?---1---?--- • s` Precambrian eras . 20..000- . Figure 3-6-Geologic history of Wisconsin,with emphasis on the Ice Age from Lee Clayton,John W.Attig,David M. Mickelson,Mark D.Johnson,and Kent M.Syverson,Educational Series 36,2006 As can be seen in Figure 3-6,the Wisconsin Age glacial events began approximately 25,000 years before present,with the Vashon Stade beginning its advance into the Puget Lowlands approximately 18,000 years before present. It should be noted that during the Vashon Stade recession, there was at least one "re-advance" that occurred for brief periods of time, between what is called the Everson Interstade which is associated with much of the glaciomarine drift (in the Puget Lowlands)followed by the relatively brief Sumas Stade advance and recession. It is unclear how these "re-advances" affected the Cascade alpine glaciers; however, it is assumed that any continental glacial advance into the Puget Lowlands would be accompanied by a re-advance of alpine glaciers in the Cascades and Olympic Mountains. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company I II Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 30 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 3. 2. 2 Cascadia Subduction Zone y As discussed above, the geomorphology of the Puget Lowlands (Puget Sound trough) and the subsequent upland areas is believed to be associated with crustal folding caused by a"tectonic" subduction zone. A subduction zone is rn the phenomenon where oceanic seafloor materials are being "drawn" (subducted) under continental materialsl. The "movement" of the oceanic materials (tectonic plate) is believed to be caused by several processes that include a m c3 "sinking"of the seafloor plate beneath the continental plate due to an increase in mass caused by continental deposits o on the sea floor over time as it nears the continental plate margin and the convection of mantle materials beneath the earth's "crust" (Schellart, W.P., Freeman, J., Stegman, D. R., Moresi, L., and May, D., Evolution and diversity of c, subduction zones controlled by slab width. Nature 446, 308-311,(15 March 2007)doi: 10.1038/nature 05615). < The Pacific Northwest is somewhat unique because there is an offshore spreading center, called the Juan de Fuca a ridge that is unusually close to the corresponding subduction zone. The Juan de Fuca ridge is the divergent plate o boundary of the Pacific Plate to the west(portions of this plate subduct to the west at the Mariana Plate) and the Juan de Fuca Plate to the east(that subducts to the east at the North American Plate boundary). The area where the Juan de Fuca Plate is being subducted beneath the North American Plate is called a subduction zone. The Juan de o Fuca/North American Plate subduction zone is part of the Cascadia subduction zone (Figure 3-7 — Cascadia 330 Subduction Zone), and is believed to be a remnant of the older Farallon tectonic plate. m Offshorc Fault SUBDUCTION LONE North American +r Plate Pacific Juan de Fuca Plate Plate Magma Figure 3.7-Cascadia Subduction Zone- Ecology, 2008 I Until recently,it was believed that the subducted plate was being forced under the continental plate by forces generated at the"spreading ridge",however,more recent discoveries suggest that the subducting plate is'pulling°away from the spreading center allowing mantle magma to"well"up into the area where the two divergent plates are being separated.Recent discoveries suggest that the subducting plate is"pulling"away from the spreading center allowing mantle magma to "well°up into the area where the two divergent plates are being separated. Traction from the upwelling mantle plumes via convection also pulls the"plate"towards the continental crust,where the mantle materials"dive°as they are cooled. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 31 "elan,!den;cation and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance*sport Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number: 921094026 • The Pacific Northwest tectonic "regime" is complex, because of the different interactions between the three tectonic plates2; however, a simplified discussion on the plate tectonic forces that created the geomorphology of the Puget Lowlands can be used to explain how the troughs, ridges, mountain ranges, and volcanism evolved in Western Washington. These features are the underlying primary geomorphologic template that has been refined by erosion to from precipitation and from glaciation (and to a lesser extent, wind and wave action), leaving topography for the cc surface water hydrology to develop into an erosional force of its own, in the form of streams and rivers. > It should be noted that the soils and geomorphology of the Puget Lowland is quite unique and is not found elsewhere in = Washington State or even Oregon and Northern California(on the same scale)which are also included in the Cascadia in subduction zone. The Puget Lowland has some of the youngest soils in Washington State, which are orders of magnitude younger than the soils of Oregon or California, except in the Cascade Range where Holocene volcanism has created new depositional materials or smaller regional areas where landslide activity or ongoing erosion (such as > that caused by rivers and streams) is exposing materials and is re-depositing these materials where they develop into o new soils. J o Additionally, the Olympic Mountain Range and the Cascade Range that bound the Puget Lowlands provide unique geomorphology that has created climate and weather patterns that are somewhat unusual, with rainfall ranging from less than 24 inches per year in the Olympic Mountain Range rain shadow (e.g., Port Hadlock, WA) to the 144 plus ti inches of yearly precipitation in the Olympic Mountain Range rain forests, the only temperate rain forest in the continental United States. 0 ti What is also unique about the Puget Lowland geomorphology is that the Puget Sound, which is a very large bay, is a fjord system of flooded glacial valleys and is a very large salt water estuary,or system of many estuaries,fed by highly seasonal freshwater streams and rivers from the Olympic and Cascade Mountain watersheds. The uniqueness of the Puget Lowlands is reflected in many ways, including the surface water hydrology, ground water, and wetland areas present in this Province. As previously discussed, subduction zones are areas where an oceanic crustal plate and a continental plate initially converge and then begin to subduct. The Cascadia subduction zone(as with most continental subduction zones) has what is called an accretionary wedge where continental sediments (and other"marine" sediments) have accumulated on the sea floor and have been moved towards the subduction zone (Figure 3-8). Some of these sediments are subducted with the sea floor(much of these sediments simply build up along the subduction zone to be reworked and redeposited), which introduces water and sedimentary deposits (most of which are derived from the continental plate), including silicates and clays, into the upper mantle. The introduction of these materials into the mantle area is a key factor in the generation of trust fault earthquakes and the activity of the Cascade volcanoes(Wang, K., He,J., Dragert, H., and James, T. S., Three-dimensional viscoelastic interseismic deformation model for the Cascadia subduction zone: Earth Planets Space,53,295-306,2001). The subduction zone also provides compressional and uplift force that can cause warping of the under thrust plate (the continental plate). This "warping" more closely resembles folding, which can lead to "valley ridge"topography or on a larger scale, basin and range topography. In Western Washington, these forces have created mountain — trough topography, with the Olympic Mountains to the west, the trough system making up the Puget Lowlands (valleys and ridges),and the Cascade Range to the east3. z There are actually several plates,the Juan de Fuca Plate is bounded to the south by the Gorda Plate and to the north by the Explorer Plate. 3 This continues onto the Rocky Mountains,with the area from the Pacific Coast to this mountain range generally being called the Basin and Range Province. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Dekneation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 32 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 As discussed later in this section,the folded materials,synclines and anticlines,found in the Puget Lowland have axial co folds that can be weaker than the surrounding materials, especially in synclines. Syncline and anticline are terms used _ to describe folds based on the relative ages of folded rock layers. A syncline is a fold in which the youngest rocks y occur in the core of a fold (i.e.,closest to the fold axis), whereas the oldest rocks occur in the core of an anticline. Erosion from surface water (rivers and streams) and glaciation can preferentially "cut" into the axis of the synclinal 2: folds, this can result in the creation of river valleys and the highly defined troughs observed throughout the Puget o Lowland. These "troughs" are as much structurally created as they are erosionally created, because the erosional o forces are working on the underlying geologic structure. o -< Cascadia subduction zone (view to the south) a rA. Z 0 ' ,J., -LL. ....' / r M 0 , 40, , : ,_ ... e ,--- - : 0 < a '- a..a- j„ .r image from Pratson&Haxby(1996 Geology.v 24. no 1 ',OOa _ ■no ttnoo t 4,ptn,[11 Figure 3-8-Looking South at the Cascadia Subduction Zone and Accretionary Wedge 3.2.2.1 Folding, Faulting, and Volcanism The initial stages of the Cascadia plate convergence are believed to have begun approximately 36 million years BP. This convergence can create enormous forces that can change the surface topography significantly (Stanley, W.D., S.Y. Johnson, A.I. Qamar, C.S. Weaver, and J.M. Williams, Tectonics and seismicity of the southern Washington Cascade Range: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1996 86:1-18). These forces include compressional forces that can affect the continental plate significantly enough to cause folding and uplift that result in features such as the troughs observed in the Puget Lowland(as previously discussed, many of these are actually anticlinal and synclinal folds)and the mountain building to the west and east of the Puget Lowland (the Olympic Mountains to the west and the Cascade Range to the east). There are three spreading ridges', in the Pacific Northwest; the Gordo Ridge off the coast of Northern California, the Juan de Fuca Ridge off the coasts of Oregon and Washington, and the Explorer Ridge off the Coast of British Colombia(west of Vancouver Island). These ridges combine to form the western boundary of the Cascadia subduction zone. The ridges and the subduction zone are generally south - north trending; however,the ridges are separated by fracture zones(faults),that generally trend west—east(Figure 3-9). Many geologists treat the three tectonic plates as one plate that is simply moving at different rates and has"broken"into three blocks separated by faults, including strike-slip faults like the South Whidbey Island fault. August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company 33 Wetland Identification and Delineation and tream Reconnaissance'eport Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Court Parcel Number: 921094026 a- These fracture zones generally correlate with the trends of most major earthquake faults located east of the subduction co zone (these faults generally trend northwest to southeast). However, there are also north - south trending faults 0 J (similar to the spreading ridges trends) present east of the subduction zone that are believed to be associated with the ,°,,, compressional forces generated by the Cascadia subduction zone. o ° The west-east trending faults can have a "strike-slip"5 component (e.g., the South Whidbey Island fault zone and °C Rattlesnake Mountain fault zone) that is associated with differential movement along the spreading ridge and the 0 > subduction zone (Liberty, Lee M., Pape, K., Sherrod, B. L., Blakely, R. J., Weaver, C. S., Kelsey, H. M., Barnett, E., = and Meagher, K. L., "Finding Concealed Active Faults: Extending the Southern Whidbey Island Fault Across the Puget o Lowland,Washington."Journal of Geophysical Research 113.B05313(2008):doi: 10.1029/2007JB005060). z ¢ These faults are often observed to be a series of ground surface fractures that are called en-echelon fault zones. It is - believed that there are many more of these types of faults located in the Puget Lowlands than have currently been ° recognized due to the relatively significant amount of vegetation that is present in the Pacific Northwest. However, with ° the development of Light Detention And Ranging (LiDAR)technologies that have been used for aerial mapping, more J o of these faults are being identified because this technology can"penetrate"the vegetative cover. W %, y O CO3 ►+ 44 0'4.%,,,d bier %Vancouver ', j ma 4,, +. 'am ,.. .. d •Everstl 1 1)1 I some C- n /Tacoma ' 4 4V GTON rt TVO � N Portland a: .y r' 'i Salem Alone466`... Juan den= NorthAmorlcio .y Po • Eugene ;' OREGON PACIFIC OCEAN �..a $r+ b I •eureka 0' 1..., Mendocino Fracture Karoo ``. CALfFORNIA San Andreas Fault .'. Figure 3.9•Ridges and Fracture Zones of the Cascadia Subduction Zone,USGS 2011 5 This"strike-slip"movement has been measured to be approximately 4 cm per year and this movement is ongoing at this time. August 25,2011 Copyright 0 2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 34 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number. 921094026 There are two primary types of faults observed in Western Washington, those associated directly with the subducting " oceanic plate(mega thrust faults) and those that are associated with the crustal stresses caused by the subduction of _ this tectonic plate(dip slip and strike-slip faults and to some extent normal and reverse faults). y It is believed that the subduction zone faults will generate the most significant ground movement (earthquakes) and that most of the historic large earthquakes in Western Washington were associated with subduction zone faulting Gm') (Clague, J.J., and Bobrowsky, P.J., 1994b, Evidence for a large earthquake and tsunami 100-400 years ago on ° western Vancouver Island, British Columbia: Quaternary Research,v.41, p. 176-184). c This includes a large seismic event that is believed to have been a magnitude 9+ (on the Richter scale). This -< earthquake is believed to have caused a tsunami that not only struck the Pacific coast (from Northern California to portions of British Colombia coast lines), but also crossed the Pacific Ocean to Japan, where it damaged coastal z villages. Written records of the damage in Japan pinpoint the earthquake to the evening of January 26, 1700(USGS, 2009). The Olympic Peninsula and the ancillary Islands, including the San Juan Islands are believed to have been formed by o the Cascadia subduction zone accretionary wedge where older basalts were overturned and mixed with xi metamorphosed continental margin marine deposits. In fact, geology ° rp g p ogy of Marrowstone Island may be influenced by a northwest to east trending fault or other structural anomaly based on differences in bedrock depths as is suggested by r*+ Dan McShane on September 11, 2010,who states: An intriguing feature of the bedrock on Marrowstone Island is that bedrock is found along the shores south of the hamlet of Nordland,but to the north the depth of bedrock is greater than ° 1,500 feet with no wells penetrating to the bedrock suggesting a major preglacial structure that happens to align in a s parallel manner with faults to the east suggested on Whidbey Island." (McShane, Dan, Marrowstone Island Geology Trip to see Nodules (actually concretions) and Lips: Reading The Washington Landscape blogspot, September 11, 2010). Plate tectonics created the landforms of Western Washington; however,erosion from precipitation, rivers and streams, wind, and glaciation combined with volcanism refined these landforms to what we see today, although, tectonic plate movement is still occurring and the subduction zone is still creating uplift of the continental tectonic plate. This movement will lead to more earthquakes and volcanism in the future and will create new templates for erosion to sculpt and refine (Booth, D. B., Troost, K. G., and Hagstrum, J. T., 2004, Deformation of Quaternary strata and its relationship to crustal folds and faults,central Puget Lowland,Washington: Geology,v. 32, pp. 505-508). Although the tectonic activity that began almost 40 million years BP created the most significant geomophological characteristics of Western Washington, other more recent events have had a profound effect on the geology, geomorphology, surface water hydrology, and hydrogeology of this region, and, for the purposes of this report, a specific area within this region,the Puget Lowland. The area of the Puget Lowland generally refers to the area in Western Washington that is bounded to the north by the Canadian border(the Frasier River Valley) and to the south, approximately 15 miles from the City of Olympia (where the Vashon Stade continental glaciation terminal moraine is located), to the west by the foothills of the Olympic Mountains,and to the east by the foothills of the Cascade Range. Many geologic events have occurred in the Puget Lowland in the last 40 million years; however, most of these events are not casually observable because more recent events have obscured these older events with more recent surface deposits that cover the older materials and structures. However, for the purposes of these studies, the more recent geologic events are those that are the most applicable because these created the surface geology and depositional environments that affects the landforms that we observe now. August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company 35 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 >- The most recent geologic events that have occurred throughout the Puget Lowlands and are readily observable are ° those associated with the continental glaciation of the Vashon Stade of the Frasier glaciation cycle. The Vashon Stade began in the late Pleistocene (approximately 18,000 - 20,000 years BP) and ended near the beginning of the ° w Holocene (approximately 10,000- 12,000 years BP). In the northern portions of the Puget lowlands it is believed that ° a minor second Frasier age glacial advance and retreat occurred following the Everson interstade. This minor Stade is ° called the Sumas Stade which is believed to have completely retreated shortly before 9,920± 760 years ago, which is ° the Holocene age (Easterbrook, D.J., 1969, Pleistocene chronology of the Puget Lowland and San Juan Islands, = Washington: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 80, p. 2273-2286.). Marrowstone Island is located far enough ° north that Sumas Stade glacial deposits may be present; however, all of the glaciomarine deposits are believed to be associated with the Everson interstade. az 3.2.2.2 Continental Glaciation cm As previously discussed, continental glaciation associated with the Frasier glacial events has dramatically affected the ° geomorphology, surface water hydrology, hydrogeology, and surface geology of the Puget lowlands. The most recent, o significant event that has affected the surface geology and geomorphology of the entire Puget Lowland is the Vashon cA, Stade of the Frasier glaciation events (Figure 3-10 - Puget Lowland Glacial Events, from Berger and Easterbrook, 1993). J 0 C/3 PUGET LOWLAND Southern Northern SUMAS DRIFT 11 EVERSON 12.5 FRASER DRIFT E GUICIDMARNIE DRFT ,.15 cc VASHON TILL VASHON DRIFT ESPERANCE SAND LAWTON CLAY 22 SI_DIMEN TS OF THE SEDIMENTS OF THE U) NONGLACIAL OLYMPIA W NONGLACIJU. INTERVAL = OLYMPIA INTERVAL 30 Z W Q POSSESSION DRIFT < m 90 WHIDBEY FORMATION (INTERGLACIAL) 140? DOUBLE BLUFF DRIFT -250? Figure 3.10-Puget Lowland Glacial Events,from Berger and Easterbrook, 1993 August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson 36 Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 The Frasier glaciation events first began entering the continental United States in the mid-Wisconsin age of the rt.' Pleistocene Epoch, approximately 50,000 years BP (Booth, D.B., and Hallet, B., 1993, Channel networks carved by o subglacial water: Observations and reconstruction in the eastern Puget Lowland of Washington: Geological Society of y America Bulletin, v. 105, pp. 671-683). There were several glacial advances, recessions, and interstades (a period when glaciers do not exist for a significant period of time) during this glacial cycle; however, the most recent (and possibly the last) Frasier glacial (the Vashon Stade6,)event began its advance into the Puget lowlands approximately or 20,000 years BP7. r- 0 This most recent Frasier glacial event, the Vashon Stade, began as an advance from the Frasier Valley of British a) Columbia approximately 18,000 — 20,000 years BP. As the Vashon ice sheet progressed to the southwest into the < northern portion of the Puget lowlands, it began to influence the surface water hydrology, changing the flow of rivers s and streams, and as the ice sheet advanced into the Puget trough (the Puget Lobe), this "lobe" and the Juan de Fuca z Lobe (that trended west through the Strait of Juan de Fuca) eventually filled the Strait of Juan de Fuca and the 0 northern portions of the Puget Sound completely with ice. This eliminated the salt water connection with the Pacific Ocean, changing the drainage in the Puget lowlands from northerly drainage to southerly drainage (Booth, D.B., 1986, The formation of ice-marginal embankments into ice- 330 dammed lakes in the eastern Puget Lowland, Washington, U.S.A., during the late Pleistocene: Boreas, v. 15, pp. 247- o 263). This caused the water trapped behind the Juan de Fuca ice dam to rise to the elevation of the lowest drainage o point to the south(a drainage way to the Chehalis River). r- 0 The advance and retreat(recession) of the Vashon Stade was fairly rapid and is summarized in the following excerpt from Derek Booth,et al., The Cordilleran Ice Sheet,2003.ppgs 17-43 Rates of ice sheet advance and retreat are well constrained in the central Puget Lowland. The Puget Lobe advanced to the latitude of Seattle by about 14,5001aCyr BP(17,590 cal yr BP)and to its maximum by 14,0001aCyr BP(16,950 cal yr BP) (Porter& Swanson, 1998). The ice apparently remained near its maximum position only a few hundred years and then rapidly retreated. It retreated past Seattle by 13,6001aCyr BP(16,575 cal yr BP) (Porter&Swanson, 1998). Glacial lakes, including Lake Russell, formed south of the retreating ice front, draining through a spillway to the Chehalis River(Bretz, 1913). The lakes coalesced into one lake, Lake Bretz(Lake Leland of Thorson, 1980), which enlarged northward as the ice front retreated until a northern spillway was uncovered. Further backwasting allowed sea water to enter the lowland from the Strait of Juan de Fuca. Glaciomarine drift and other marine deposits accumulated in the northern lowland where land had not yet rebounded from isostatic depression. This interstade—named the Everson by Armstrong et al. (1965)—ended about 12,0001aCyr BP lsostatic rebound raised the glaciomarine and marine deposits above sea level between about 13,500 and 11,30014Cyr BP(Dethier et al., 1995). 3.2.2.3 The Vashon Stade Similar to very slow flowing water, the Vashon advance followed existing topography as water would. However, because glacial ice is a moving solid, glacial erosion has characteristics that often differ from surface water erosion, including erosion caused by abrasion, ice jacking, freeze thaw cycles, and by physical displacement. Additionally, unlike flowing water, an advancing ice sheet will remove all vegetation and soils as the ice sheet passes over an area, effectively denuding an area. 6 There was at least one other smaller glacial Stade that followed the Vashon Stade,but this glacial advance was minor and did not extend completely into the entire Puget Lowland,this is the Sumas Stade. We are currently in the Olympia non-glacial interval. ?Some geologists believe that the Pacific Northwest is still in a Frasier glacial cycle and that the Pacific Northwest is currently in an"interstade",a non-glacial cycle that will eventually end in a renewed glacial advance. August 25,2011 Copynght©2011 SNR Company 37 Wetland Identification and Delineation and tream Reconnaissance-eport Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number 921094026 As the ice sheet advances, the ice accumulation over an area becomes thicker, eventually emerging from valleys onto ° plateau areas. If the advance lasts long enough and there continues to be ice buildup, the glacial ice sheet can -+ become thick enough to blanket significant areas, including hills and in some cases, low lying mountains and the ,, foothills of higher mountains (e.g., portions of the Cascade Range and the Olympic Mountains). Literature suggests W that at the maximum advance, the Vashon ice sheet was up to 1,000 meters thick over the area (some literature x suggests up to a mile thick) now occupied by modern day Seattle(Cole, 1967). This would mean that the continental ° ice sheet would extend up to 2/3 the height of the Cascade passes and is believed to have converged with alpine = glaciers that had formed in the Cascade Range and the Olympic Mountains (Gillespie, A., and Molnar P., 1995, ° Asynchronous maximum advances of mountain and continental glaciers, Rev. Geophys., 33(3), 311-364, doi:10.1029/95RG00995). As with most glaciers, the Vashon ice sheet would preferentially cut deeper and more rapidly through softer,fractured >- materials (less indurated)than it would through solid rock(more indurated). Therefore glacial scouring is more evident c in the softer materials and in materials that are fractured or have otherwise been weakened. Because the trough areas -.I in the Puget lowlands are folded crustal material, the core of these folds is often fractured and is less indurated than 0 u, the surrounding materials, which means that the Vashon ice sheet can cut through the axis of these troughs easier c9 than it can cut the slopes and plateaus that bound these troughs. This is the process that helped develop the trough y and ridge morphologies that we observe today. - However, in addition to causing erosion, the advancing ice sheet affected surface water flows and generated its own ° surface water flows in the form of streams that emerged from the glacial ice sheet front into the terminal moraine area, ti which, during the glacial advance was being "pushed" south. These streams generated significant flows that transported materials from the advancing ice sheet in the form of streams and rivers that flowed into glacial lakes and other water bodies,creating delta fans. The sediments deposited during the glacial advance are called glacial advance outwash deposits (which can also include lacustrine deposits when these glacial advance deposits were deposited in lakes or other ponded water). During the Vashon advance, where deltas were formed, near shore deposits were primarily sands; however, the distal deposits were generally silts and clays(lake deposits),with the finer deposits being the farthest from the shore(where the stream or river entered in this water body). In the Puget lowlands, many of these advance outwash deposits were eventually overridden by the Vashon ice sheet, which resulted in the deposition of glacial till over these deposits. In some areas of the Puget lowlands this type of deposition was over Vashon advance lacustrine deposits which can sometimes lead to landslide hazards, especially if the Vashon lodgment till overlies significant sequences of Vashon advance lacustrine deposits,such as the Lawton clay. Although the Vashon Stade advance did include a significant amount of fluvial deposition as advance outwash 9 9 po deposits, the streams and rivers generated by the advancing ice were generally similar to in size and volume to the modern day rivers and streams. However, as the Vashon ice sheet began to retreat, the glacial ice began melting, providing large quantities of surface water that led to much larger streams and rivers at a time when sea level was much lower than it was today. The volume of water generated was substantial, and the sediments that were transported by these higher flow(and larger)rivers and streams is usually different from advance outwash deposits. The deposits from the glacial recession streams and rivers are called recessional outwash deposits and these deposits generally include coarser materials than advance outwash deposits and often include gravels, cobbles, and occasionally boulders. There were other types of glacial recession deposition, including "ice contact deposits" that include lateral moraine,terminal moraine, kame deposits, and eskers. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 98 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 Rampart deposits are also present(from the collapse of glacial lake ice darns); however, the volume of these deposits co) in the Puget lowlands is relatively minor compared to the fluvially deposited recessional outwash deposits8. Most of the _ glacial recessional outwash deposits were into the glacial lakes until the recession advanced enough to allow drainage y to the west and southwest. However, water was still impounded behind the Strait of Juan de Fuca ice dam. With continued recession,the ice in the Strait of Juan de Fuca began to float and break up as berg ice. This event changed G7 the drainage from being to the south and west to the normal, northerly drainage. o One of the predominant features observed throughout the Puget lowlands are "abandoned" deeply incised stream o channels that are found on the slopes below ridges, especially slopes on the walls of river valleys. These are often o relict glacial meltwater channels that were created when the lakes in the region began to empty as the ice dam < blocking the Strait of Juan de Fuca started to float and break into berg ice. It is anticipated that once the ice began to a float,the drainage of the Puget lowlands was relatively rapid. z At this time, it is believed that ice pendants may have remained on the ridges above these valleys(although"cooler"air will seek lower elevations, the temperatures are always cooler at high elevations) and as the ice melted, prior to the = Strait of Juan de Fuca flow being reestablished, the melt water flowed into glacial lakes atop relict meltwater deltas. o When the lake levels dropped rapidly, these flows in the relict meltwater channels began to deeply cut into the slopes o that were exposed, including the deltas that were formed from sediments transported by these relict meltwater o channels when the lake level was higher. The incision into the slopes increased until these deeply cut channels o reached equilibrium with the completely emptied lakes(or the glacial ice pendants were completely melted). r- 0 Once the ice pendants had completely melted, the source water that cut the channels was gone and the channels became abandoned or underfit ephemeral drainage channels. Since European settlement,these relict channels have '4 been frequently used as stormwater conveyances from stormwater facilities located on the ridges and plateaus above the historic glacial lake valleys (many of which are modern day river valleys). Some were also used to channel irrigation water from lakes perched on the ridges and other elevated areas. Many of these lakes are kettle lakes,which are actually formed by the retreating glacier;the retreating ice sheet would calve ice blocks, similar to ice bergs formed in Alaskan bays. These ice blocks fell into the recessional outwash waters and were covered with the deposits in these flows. After the ice block melted, a depression was formed and this depression often filled with perched ground water to become a kettle lake, As previously discussed, the Vashon Stade glaciations led to four primary deposits in the Puget lowlands (there are several other glacial deposit types found in the Puget lowlands10; however, these four primary deposits account for 90%of the materials deposited),these deposits are: 1. Lake deposits(lacustrine),which include silts,silty clays,and clays,with the Lawton formation being an example of these deposits formed during the glacial advance(some fine deposits may actually be distal floodplain deposits and alluvial deposits on deltas); 2. Glacial advance outwash deposits which are primarily sands,but some gravels and minor amounts of silt are also associated with these materials that were deposited in front of the advancing ice sheet,with the Esperance sands being an example of these deposits; s Although Vashon glacial till covers a larger area,the volume of recessional outwash deposits is much larger than that of the glacial till,which typically averages 2- 4 feet deep. Also,until the Juan de Fuca lobe began to float and break up,some recessional outwash deposits were in the form of delta deposits,which could result in clay and silt deposits in still water bodies. 9 It should be noted that there were numerous alpine glaciers that formed during the Vashon Stade advance and that some of these glaciers advanced from the Cascade Range(and the Olympic Mountains)to the Puget lobe ice sheet. The retreats of these alpine glaciers created glacial lakes such as Glacial Lake Skykomish that would have had unique deposition in these areas,including silts and days that would later be covered by recessional outwash deposits as the Puget lobe retreated. 1°E.g.,ice contact deposits such as kame and esker deposits,moraine deposits,jokulhlaup's,etc. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 39 Wetland Identification and Delineation and tream-econnaissance-eport Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number: 921094026 } 3. Glacial till that was formed by direct contact of the ice sheet on the materials beneath(and to ° the sides)of the advancing ice sheet,this till is referred to as the Vashon till and can be a ° sandy,silty,gravelly diamict of materials including"rock flour"that is commonly cemented c and has been referred to as hardpan;and LIJ 4. Recessional outwash deposits of sands,gravels,and cobbles that were deposited behind the o retreating ice sheet. Recessional outwash deposits are technically fluvial deposits that were cc transported by streams and rivers generated from the melting ice sheet. Y' The Vashon Stade glaciation created the greatest volume of the surface deposits that are currently observed in the = Puget lowlands; however, other deposition has taken place since the Vashon ice sheet completely retreated from the ° Puget lowlands between 10,000—12,000 years BP. This deposition,which includes fluvial,fluvial-deltaic, and volcanic z < sources, is relatively minor compared to the almost 10,000 years of deposition from an ice sheet that was up to 1,000 meters thick over the central Puget lowlands at the hiatus of the Vashon Stade advance. a ° The Vashon Stade glacial retreat was at the end of the Pleistocene Epoch, ranging between 12,000 — 10,000 years - BP, which means that there has been non-glacial deposition in the Puget lowlands during this last 10,000 years, ° including fluvial (rivers), volcanic, and generalized erosional deposition that has gently changed the landscape and W cm geomorphology. y Although in localized areas, these changes have been somewhat less than gentle, such as the Osceola mudflow from - Mount Rainier approximately 5,600 years ago which is one of the world's largest volcanic lahar deposits that o completely filled the Duwamish embayment to the modern day City of Renton and flooded all of the river valleys west ti and northwest of Mount Rainer, including the Green and White Rivers. However, in general, the amount of change is relatively minor compared to the continental glacial advance (and retreat) and this also means that most of the Puget lowlands soils are less than 10,000 years old (and in many places there are no soils). We are currently living in the Holocene Epoch of the Quatemary period,of the Cenozoic era,of the Phanerozoic eon. 3. 2. 3 Local Geology The subject property is located east of the eastern foothills of the Olympic Mountains (the Eastern Puget Lowland), which is located near the northwestern boundary of the Puget lowlands. This area of the Puget lowlands has been strongly influenced by tectonically induced folding, faulting, and pre-Cascade volcano volcanism (mostly basalts) as well as,the more recent, Pleistocene Epoch continental and alpine glaciation events. The formation of the Olympic Mountains and Cascade Range and the folding and faulting (that is also associated with earthquakes) that created much of the Western Washington geomorphology is a result of the tectonic forces associated with the Juan de Fuca Plate subducting beneath the North American Plate. There are other complex mechanisms and chemical interactions that are also associated with the Cascadia subduction zone; these can lead to major earthquake activity that is focused in the asthenosphere. This type of earthquake activity is different from the activity that is associated with the tensional and compressional forces along plate boundaries, which can exhibit themselves as surficial ruptures, or as more commonly called,faults. The Cascadia subduction zone is continuously moving at a rate of approximately 3-4 cm per year(about the same rate that fingernails grow). The forces generated by this subduction zone continue to create uplift of the North American continental plate and the compressional forces that result in movement along plate margin faults and tensional forces that can cause folding and other types of faulting,which can result in earthquakes. August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 40 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number. 921094026 There are no known tensional fault zones located in the vicinity of the subject property; however, this does not mean w that these faults do not exist (until the development of LiDAR imagery the identification of active faults in the Pacific °_ Northwest was based more on luck than actual efforts to find these faults). The USGS does suggest that en echelon y fault traces of the South Whidbey Island fault zone are present near the northern most portion of Marrowstone Island • (Figure 3-11 —USGS Holocene Fault Traces on Google Earth Professional). G) m This fault zone does have a strike-slip component and is believed to continue east near the City of Woodinville and o then trend southeast through the Snoqualmie River Valley and then trend east, southeast through the Cities of o Snoqualmie and North Bend (where it is associated with the Rattlesnake Mountain fault zone) and is believed to o continue southeast through the Cascade Range and into Eastern Washington. This fault zone is known to have up to s 1/2 mile strike-slip offsets during the Holocene. a 3.2.3.1 Cascade Mountain Range Z 0 The northern Cascades and the southern Cascades are split approximately along the Interstate 90 corridor. The = northern Cascade geology is dominated by metamorphosed rocks emplaced while the oceanic slab was subducted. < The southern Cascades however are relatively unmetamorphosed volcanic material. Mount Si is an example of highly z metamorphosed material, while much of the Snoqualmie Pass area is underlain by a large igneous batholith, which is o not metamorphosed. The subject property is believed to be located above intrusive and extrusive volcanic bedrock at c) P 1 P P rtY� ,,, depth(volcanic and metamorphic bedrock materials are believed to underlie the Pleistocene glacial deposits). O r ••••ne 0 0 rtV. .e4�t . '1401441.441t. Pon TOeneenO \ \ IP f -.i:aa� t;:,. " �Le 6 r ;74 ^s*.`S+, 4 ,� � P ttV tN•elo klrU2.eue O. vu `%fr 4 e 9!1ee�dw n RO NoMle a WA 1 Pict or.t, W s CS Figure 3-11 -USGS Holocene Fault Traces on Google Earth Professional,2010 The subject property is located in a volcanically active area(all of the Puget lowlands are in a volcanically active area), with the highly active Glacier Peak Cascade volcano being located less than 80 miles to the east of the subject property. Mount St. Helens,which is the most active of the Washington State Cascade volcanoes, is located less than 120 miles to the southeast of the subject property (Mt. Rainier is located less than 90 miles from the subject property but is less active). August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company 41 Wetland Identification and Delineation and tream•econnaissance 'eport Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA - mCoun% P.rcelNumber: •2109412. a— Glacier Peak and Mount St. Helens have erupted several times since the last significant continental and alpine glaciation and deposits from these volcanoes can be found on the subject property in the form of ash and tephra -I (larger volcanic debris), with what are believed to be primarily Mount St. Helens' derived pyroclastic deposits. The other volcanoes in this area also erupted during the Vashon Stade glacial advance and this is one of the reasons that co many of the glacial till materials do include significant amounts of volcanic ash. °C 3.2.3.2 The Olympic Mountain Range a- The Olympic Mountains are, to some extent, an extension of the Coast Range from Oregon (and Northern California) which form the core of the Olympic Peninsula. The Coast Range basement consists of Eocene Crescent Formation z basalts, which were erupted close to North America in a marine setting. The formation consists mostly of thick Q submarine basalt flows such as pillow lavas. Locally, subaerial flows are preserved where islands, such as Marrowstone Island,formed during the Eocene. co The Crescent Formation was deposited on continentally derived marine sediments and is locally interbedded with early Eocene limy red sediments that now are limestones. During the middle Eocene, about 50 million years ago, the Crescent Formation was deformed due to the Cascadia subduction zone oceanic plate's submergence below the North C7 American tectonic plate that created an accretionary wedge (as previously discussed). As the Cascadia subduction zone oceanic plate continued to subduct beneath the North American tectonic plate, sediments from the prism were w thrust or underplated beneath the Crescent Formation. This resulted in the "uplift "of the Olympic Mountains during c middle to late Miocene and is believed to have been caused by arching of the subducting oceanic slab. It is believed CO that the Crescent Formation was arched into a structural feature known as an antiform (Figure 3-12 - Olympic Mountain Formation from Accretion of the Juan de Fuca tectonic plate under the North American Plate - Evergreen College, Field Trip Guide to Skokomish Basin, Olympic Mountains,2004). OyrrplcsUplif t U M Cascadia Detorrration Olympic Coast Morale Hunicane Seam basin /front basin \ I Otym• Ridpat ault baton• �'►� �� • ;-�9J- Pre-Tartiary a 1a�V�� . •./" Contfentalframowod l.....CaaslRange od, •. "'r + ter cane 7I r f'�7j7 SO km(V2) - jJ j 1 f/l subductiorconUpperOlympic plex 111 j �'� SedintsolCascad iabasinand Cascadianeacc roton arywodge(including LowerandCoastalOSC) ■ Moderniorearcbasins Figure 3.12.Olympic Mountain Formation from Accretion of the Juan de Fuca Tectonic Plate under the North American Plate-Evergreen College, Field Trip Guide to Skokomish Basin,Olympic Mountains,2004 The Cascadia subduction zone tectonic plate that formed the Olympic Mountain accretionary wedge is the Juan de Fuca tectonic plate. This continental plate not only created the processes necessary to form the Olympic Mountains, it is also responsible for the entire Olympic Peninsula geomorphology, the Island building, and the geomorphology of western Washington. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report 1.42 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 Marine nearshore clastic sedimentation continued on the flanks of the Olympic Peninsula throughout the Oligocene y and early Miocene. By the middle Miocene, convergence of the Juan de Fuca Plate with the North American Plate o accelerated to the point that sedimentary, volcanic, and metamorphic rocks along the west flank of the Olympics were r y broken,jumbled, and chaotically mixed to form a mélange. This formation is known as the Hoh rock assemblage; its sedimentary blocks contain foraminiferal faunas from middle Eocene to Oligocene in age. Hoh mélange rocks are G� exposed along 45 miles of the western coast. A pronounced angular unconformity marks the top of the Hoh,on which the marine Quinault Formation was deposited during the Pliocene. r- 0 Because of the evolving processes (over time) that formed the Olympic Peninsula, it is divided into two domains, the o peripheral domain and the core domain, The peripheral domain is dominated by volcanic rocks and the core (also s known as the Olympic Subduction Complex)is mélange accreted (scraped off)the Juan de Fuca Plate. This wedge of a volcanic and sedimentary rocks tends to go from older (accreted first) to younger(accreted later) from east to west. z The subduction process at the Cascadia subduction zone still occurs today and mélange continues to be accreted along the western margin of the Olympic Peninsula. Rocks of the Olympic Subduction Complex were first thrust above X sea level about 12 million years ago, with accretion and uplift presently outpacing erosion in some parts of the range, o which means the Olympic Mountains are still"rising" (being uplifted)(Thackray and Pazzaglia, 1994). �o As previously discussed, the Crescent Formation is the basalt peripheral deposits (rocks) of the Olympic Mountains c, that were extruded in ocean deposits during the Middle Eocene ocean(63—46 Ma). The abundant pillow basalts that o are observed today are evidence of this under-water extrusion. Marine mudstones,sandstones,conglomerates,chert, i- and limestones are often interbedded with these basalt flows. The limestones and cherts observed in the Olympic Peninsula originated from accumulations of the shells of -4 foraminifera (microscopic marine organism). These materials have undergone significant deformation and low-grade metamorphism. This has converted some of the fine-grained sediments to slate and phyllite, and the basalts to greenstone (due to the growth of the "green" minerals chlorite and epidote). This metamorphism eliminated the planktonic shell forms, but the bedding of these deposits is still clearly visible. 3.2.3.2.1 Contact metamorphism Diabase (basalt) dikes intrude the basalt and red limestone of the Crescent Formation. The diabase is a darker green than the basalt and has a more phaneritic texture(coarser-grained). As you traverse the dike the grains become finer, or glassy, toward the margins because of the different cooling rates. The hot diabase resulted in contact metamorphism (high temperature and low pressure) of the limestone bed, changing the mineralogy of these deposits. The hematite (Fe2O3) that produced the red color in the limestone combined with calcium carbonate (CaCO3), silica (SiO2),and water to produce epidote(Ca2FeAl2O(SiO4)(SiO7)(OH))and possibly the pyroxene wollastonite(CaSiO3). Manganese deposits are associated with red limestone that is interbedded with Crescent Formation basalt. Copper is also known to be present in the Crescent Formation; with the pillow basalts of the Crescent Formation often yielding beautiful zeolite specimens. Although the sedimentary rocks of the Hoh mélange along the flanks of the Olympic Peninsula do contain both oil and gas, as evidenced by"shows" in exploratory wells and seeps along the coastline (Lasmanis, R. 1991),the exploration activities suggest that these are minor and "plays"that cannot be produced. ill August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company 43 Wetland Identfication and Delineation and tream•econnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA ft= •n •,n Parcel Number. 921094026 a- 3.2.3.2.2 Olympic Subduction Complex (Core Rocks) o As previously discussed, the Core of the Olympic Mountains is composed of marine sediments that have been c accreted (scraped off)onto the subducting oceanic plate and obducted (lifted") onto the North American Plate;this is ta' referred to as an accretionary wedge. The Core has been differentiated into several formations that have been lumped cs o into the Upper Olympic Subduction Complex(OSC)and Lower OSC(Figure 3-13—Olympic Subduction Complex from cc Evergreen College,2004). c The Hoh formation is part of the Lower OSC. This formation is located along the west-central Olympic Peninsula and consists of a series of turbidites and tectonic mélanges that are Miocene in age. The Hoh assemblage is unconformably overlain by the Late Miocene to Pliocene rocks of the Quillayute and Quinalt formations, constraining Q the deformational event which emplaced the OSC against the older"core rocks"to the Late Miocene Harris and Tuttle, P 9 ( 1977;and Brandon, M.T., Roden-Tice, M K.,and Garver,J. I., 1998). cs o , W •. km • CD 4 I,-.4"er•%0e+- tc/ c A tier • A' •t ti. =MOW MONO A t[OEND • Caw Amp ta.uu Cow a OAS,ro• r ■t•eea•rewr 0.ongulls•.0 °- w AYMyet"c^ A M010, ,f•. 01001100m e TN• •,I. ii Ne0.4n0 eegrn G O Guw pao" .o•.•.o.. .. atae••OMm ya%Ol •M oewr.Ps'c 1•bry D•brry4Y PY• cc. AY.r'C,-:.• $,n[JM IIq� .I 0 _0- •��_ ..r.a0a 1.:t•1tOYrr .e .30 N. _ .w 0 IG rat 112 200 150 IW Peery.eye,*Av.,ren•a,r,'r.r. Figure 3.13.Olympic Subduction Complex from Evergreen College,2004 Although the Cascadia subduction zone is the primary force behind the geomorphology of Western Washington and the Puget lowlands, this geomorphology has been sculpted by erosion in many different forms, including water, wind, and ice. The Puget lowlands are unique for the west coast because it is the only area on the west coast of the United States where continental glaciation events have occurred during the Pleistocene. These glacial events have been occurring for approximately 80,000 years and are always accompanied by alpine glaciers that form in the mountain ranges. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report ( " Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number. 921094026 The continental glaciation caused erosion of the north and east flanks of the Olympics; most recently by the Puget and ti San Juan Lobes of the Vashon Stade (and to a lesser extent the Sumas Stade) continental glaciation events that _ ended approximately 9,300 years ago (the Sumas Stade). Alpine glaciers also eroded and sculpted the Olympic y Mountains. Thick deposits of sand and gravel outwash deposits filled valley bottoms and covered the coastal plains. Raised wave-cut platforms along the west coast indicate periods of uplift. Many of the cliffs along the west coast are G� capped by loess(windblown sediments). ° The thick gravels and sands,such as those found in the ground water producing areas of the Chimacum Valley are the o primary source of ground water on the Olympic Peninsula (and the primary source for ground water for the Jefferson c) County PUD#1, which now provides municipal water supplies to Marrowstone Island). However, much of the Olympic < Peninsula is underlain by metamorphic and igneous rock and the only ground water producing aquifers in these areas s is the fractured metamorphic rock and in some cases basalts that have varying yields that can also produce seasonally. 3.2.3.3 Vashon Stade and Alpine Glaciation The subject property is located in an area that has a more complex glacial environment because it is in the margins of the Puget lowlands where the Juan de Fuca Lobe and the Puget Lobe diverged and where alpine glaciation interacted o with the continental glaciation and because of the Olympic Mountain topography. This resulted in more complex m depositional environments, including numerous types of deposition in smaller areas. In general,there were significant o glacial lake complexes in the Olympic Mountain foothills and numerous drainage pathways that shifted as the glaciers o advanced and retreated. Additionally,there have been periods of minor alpine glaciation advances and retreats in the c) Olympic Mountains that have occurred since the end of the last continental glacial cycle. Since continental and alpine -4 glaciers generally create the same glacial deposits, it can be difficult to distinguish which type of glaciation created the deposits that are observed in the field. However, as discussed below, the geomorphology of these types of glaciers can be distinctly different. The area where the subject property is located may have been in a"convergent"zone of the continental Puget Lobe of the Vashon Stade and the Olympic Mountain alpine glaciers that formed during this Stade. Like the continental Puget Lobe,the alpine glaciers are"rivers"of ice; however,the alpine glaciers are localized and have steeper gradients. This generally results in different glacial geomorphologic features than those observed with continental glaciers,such as the creation of cirques, horns,and aretes(narrow crests with sharp edges)erosional features. As the continental and alpine glaciers retreated, the material left behind included glacial erratics (randomly distributed boulders), outwash material, and glacial till (and in some areas, including areas in the vicinity of the subject property, lake deposits"). Much of the material transported by the glaciers, especially alpine glaciers, was derived from local sources, and included volcanic and metamorphic material from the Cascade Range. The alpine glacier materials that are believed to have been glacial deposits on the subject property would be primarily derived from volcanic materials and the primary volcanic materials in this area are basalt. The subject property is located in an area that apparently had bedrock or other "obstructions" that the Puget Lobe encountered, resulting in the creation of drumlin glacial landforms. These drumlins are orientated north — south, parallel with the advancing glacial ice sheet. (Figure 3-14 — Figure Showing Glacial Features including Drumlins). These drumlin features do affect surface water hydrology with the drumlin axis having the characteristics of a drainage divide, as does the shape of the drumlin which is that of an elongated mound, with the highest point along the drumlin axis(somewhat like a half buried football). rr Well logs in the vicinity of the subject property suggest that lake deposits are common surface deposits and can be found at depth,most likely associated with Vashon glacial advance deposition. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 45 r'e.and Wen cation and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number: 921094026 - As can be seen in Figure 3-14, drumlins form parallel to the glacial ice sheet movement. Drumlins can be associated with other glacial landform features, such as eskers (formed sub-glacially as confined stream deposits, from stream emerging from beneath the glacial ice sheet), and moraine deposits (especially in the vicinity of the subject property ,,, where alpine glacial moraines can be present and where medial and lateral moraine deposits can also be present). ca Moraine deposits are not present in the mid-reach of the Snoqualmie River Valley as they are in the Sammamish River ce Valley, which is why there is no"Lake Snoqualmie"like there is a Lake Sammamish. = terminal moraine esker drumlins l h kettle oe oo#r►ash sands • .•. vc' and ravels LIJ CO • ±: v: ''[• - ground moraine • '�Z•� 5 f1 r Figure 3.14•Figure Showing Glacial Features including Drumlins There are no kettle ponds or kettle holes located in the vicinity of the subject property, most likely because of the relatively small amount of recessional outwash deposits on Marrowstone Island. Additionally, there are no perennial streams and although the DNR and the WDFW suggest seasonal streams may be present in the southern portion of Marrowstone Island, based on the surface geology of this area and the well logs SNR has reviewed, it is unlikely that actual seasonal streams are present either. Some of the streams that have been identified may actually be ephemeral drainage area where surface water storage is present(somewhat like detention facilities in a stormwater conveyance system) and possibly human activities have also modified the hydrology of these areas (this is common in the Chimacum Valley to the west, where historic irrigation ditches have been identified by non-geologists to be streams). 3.2.3.4 Quaternary Deposits The Geologic Map of Eastern Jefferson County, Jefferson I.D.M.S., February 21, 1995; the Geologic Map of Washington--Northwest Quadrant, DNR,2002;the Department of Ecology Water Supply Bulletin Number 59, Geology, Water Resources, and Seawater Intrusion Assessment of Marrowstone Island, Jefferson County, Washington, Sinclair and Garrigues, 1994; Pessl, Fred, Jr., Dethier, D.P., Booth, D.B., and Minard, J.P., 1989, Surficial geologic map of the Port Townsend 30-by 60-minute quadrangle, Puget Sound region,Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-1198-F, scale 1:100,000; and Whetten, J.T., Carroll, P.I., Gower, H.D., Brown, E.H., and Pessl, Fred,Jr., 1988, Bedrock geologic map of the Port Townsend 30-by 60-minute quadrangle, Puget Sound region, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-1198-G, scale 1:100,000; and other maps and publications listed in the references section of this report,were also used for a generalized understanding of the surface geology on and in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. August 25,2011 Copyright m 2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 46 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number 921094026 The Quaternary period includes the Pleistocene and Holocene Epochs, The Pleistocene Epoch ranges from 2.6 rn million years ago to 11,400 before present BP. The Holocene Epoch ranges from 11,400 years BP to the present. The upper Pleistocene(approximately 300,000 years BP) included the beginning of sequences of worldwide(northern) ice ages that included the Cordilleran ice sheet advances that began entering North America approximately 50,000— 80,000 years BP. m The most recent of the Cordilleran ice sheet "glaciation events" that affected the Puget lowlands is the Fraser (late o Wisconsin) glaciation event which included at least two glacial events (some references suggest as many as four), ° known as Stades. The Frasier glaciation "began" with the Evans Creek Stade approximately 21,000 years BP. This c� Stade was followed by the Vashon Stade(the most recent of Cordilleran glaciation events), which began approximately ;< 18,000 years BP and had fully retreated by 10,000 years BP. Because the Vashon Stade was the most recent glacial s advance and retreat (the northern portions of the Puget Sound also had a minor glacial re-advance, known as the z Sumas Stade), these are usually the glacial surface deposits we see today(older glacial and interglacial deposits can ° be observed on cliff faces and road cuts in some areas of the Puget lowlands, including some of the bluffs on = Marrowstone Island). ° The geologic maps SNR reviewed suggest glacial till materials and, possibly, recessional outwash deposits and 230 advance outwash deposits are present on the subject property. However, based on well logs and field activities, the r+, surface deposits in the areas studied by SNR are not glacial lodgment till and appear to be recessional outwash o deposits overlying lodgment till. Unfortunately, there are no recently prepared, published, geologic maps for Marrowstone Island (or Indian Island) ° available at this time. Although recent geologic maps have been prepared for the Chimacum basin to the west, those < maps do not include these two Islands. However, there are many geologic maps, reports, and special investigations that SNR obtained from the United States Geological Survey,the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, the Washington State Department of Ecology, the National Ground Water Association, and the Geological Society of America,and other sources. Excerpts from some of the geologic maps reviewed by SNR are included below, these maps are: Figure 3-15 — Excerpt from the Bedrock Geologic Map of the Port Townsend 30- by 60-minute Quadrangle, Puget Sound Region, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-1198-G,scale 1:100000, 1988; Figure 3-16—Legend for Bedrock Map; Figure 3-17 - Excerpt from the Surficial Geologic Map of the Port Townsend 30- by 60-minute Quadrangle, Puget Sound Region, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-1198-F, scale 1:100,000, 1989; Figure 3-18— Legend for Surficial Geology Map; Figure 3-19 - Excerpt from the Geologic Map of Washington State, Northwest Quadrant, DNR, 2002; Figure 3-20 — Legend from the Geologic Map of Washington State, Northwest Quadrant, 2002; Figure 3-21 - Excerpt from the Geologic Map of Eastern Jefferson County, Jefferson I.D.M.S., February 21, 1995; Figure 3 -22 — Legend from the Geologic Map of East Jefferson County; and, Figure 3-23 - Excerpt from the Department of Ecology Water Supply Bulletin Number 59, 1994. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 47 I Wetland Identification and Delineator and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordlard,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number 921094026 4026,�� v ...0.,';41-4, .11 M A•rpwe.,:. t.. ` z r• x C7 lliet ���''': O :r ■4F�'Q ' a \ 'fir' I ,411f o '' VW'kW .. „, ! i'ilEllik fink ' .�. X11 i� i'l�'�whr ∎• 1-. ./1\,1 l• T_.�11 .. 1 ,,Ci` ) (��,, ,3 �" t 011.. .,cc . r / ` _\ RW n ' 1 T T ,. 7 I iii non {H7 .—(,`N Z O` °""\�,:1 ►�'�'= a. ni" ■' i�'. A li. l miller�� D i.-i , ��x + A -- m UDJE2T PROPERIY 1/ 0 Q Rur UY� qq� I• 1 .Pe.'. T 5. a r �1w 1� n y O h.." 4 , 7rt �f{I■ C '.'. � /l • 4111- ji t, ' -�`♦,,' t " .. ' 'Ili ,� •■ -it- 764 o :` N05CAL ON , • a\, , n+r ', �e I��t"' 1 -:p:. t- rOnT T,dTvUt D:d1 DY Fi0 l"INUIF 0 4DFdNG F.P Ft SppND P_ I'. e i W C'3 Figure 3.15-From Bedrock Geologic Map of the Port Townsend 30-by 60-minute Quadrangle,Puget Sound Region, Washington, 1988 y - r , J Qun THINNER UNCONSOLIDATED DEPOSITS (QUATERNARY)— o Surficial deposits, commonly less than 30 m thick. V) composed predominantly of till, outwash, landslide debris, colluvium, and interbedded sand, silt, and clay with minor lenses and thin layers of coarse-grained sand and gravel, and local accumulations of peat r-Quk THICKER UNCONSOLIDATED DEPOSITS (QUATERNARY)- Surficial deposits, inferred to be greater than 30 m thick, composed predominantly of till, outwash, landslide debris, colluvium, and interbedded sand, silt. and clay with minor lenses and thin layers of coarse-grained sand and gravel, and local accumulations of peat SEDIMENTARY ROCKS (EOCENE)—Unit fine- to medium- grained. feldspathic, thin- to thick-bedded sandstone: locally contains rounded shale clasts as much as 10 cm long. Convolute bedding and groove casts are common. Some sandstone beds exhibit cavernous weathering. Sandstone is interbedded with faintly bedded to massive, dark-gray to black siltstone. On Indian Island, this unit includes basalt dikes and volcaniclastic sub- unit composed of dark-gray to black basaltic tuff and sandstone, and tuffaceous siltstone. Volcaniclastic subunit may be correlative with part of the Crescent Formation on the Miller and Quimper Peninsulas. Foraminifers have been assigned to the Ulatisian and possibly Penutian Foraminiferal Stages by Thorns (1959) and W.W. Rau (oral commun., 1980). Unit age is early(?) and middle Eocene Figure 3-16-Legend for Bedrock Geologic Map of the Port Townsend 30-by 60-minute Quadrangle, Puget Sound Region, Washington, 1988 August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report 48 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Cam Parcel Number 921094026.in y�/' s AYr tOwneme J H •• re VI • � PA.'w eC S \ MS' A CI."'" ° f.o ,14....", rrr �IIO ow 1 OTn _ n 9 S r �A �, "i' s j�� m. ! ^ ' .-i -.5-- r.Il H.+. -�T �..,H.„ 9 C r INFA V! s ti \ � l 1- f at., n.a r m m 6” e.J 04 C.7 p 1r %M"iE' a )lfl..a-:0q+�-' ° °aC_y-r `, ;. ` sttr Cie ° aft 11,e' \ _ SUBJECT PROPERTYv 1 ,j- f / _ Ilik, �' aid. s �n T a, z n ''e"', a � od r a • r .,? ° It ••NO r ,LE �{ i. ) c'� ...sown 8i 1( • �i .O� Z 'c'I ' ' ' ' '' )e THE ter," • ...TEND 30-BY 60-MINUTE.QtJADIANGLE,FOGET SOUND REOON.WASHINGTON.It ' F -51 0 Figure 3.17-From the Surficial Geologic Map of the Port Townsend 30-by 60-minute Quadrangle,Puget Sound Region, 70 Washington,USGS,1989 ° o f -4aA ADVANCE OIJIWASH DEPOSITS--Sand, In gravel, silt, and clay deposited by meltwater flowing from advancing ice margin of the Puget ° lobe of Vashon age(Eraser glaciation):may also include the Esperance r Sand(Newcomb, 1952:Mulkneaux and others, 1965),!action Clay ° (Mutkneaux and others.1965),and Ptkhuck Clay Members(Newcomb, 0 1952.Mullineaux and others, 1965)of the Vashon Drift Texture and structure vary considerably from place to place.generally composed of moderate-to well-sorted,disanctiy stratified,light gray to tan(10YR 7:1- 74),medium to coarse sand and pebbly sand containing minor amounts of fine sandy silt,and scattered lenses and layers of pebble-cobble gravel. Stratification generally dips southeast to southwest although cross- stratification and cut-and-Bll structures are common.Where the entire thickness of the unit is preserved. flat-lying fine sand silt,and clay. ranging from nonlayered to thinly laminated predominate in the lower pan. The deposit locally becomes coarser upward and consists of moderately to poorly sorted,coarse to medium sand and gravel near the top.Thickness ranges from Ito more than 60 m,averaging 10-20 m Good examples of the (Vashonl advance outwash deposits are preserved on south and west parts of Camano Island.in seacllff exposure on north and east sides of Marrowstone Island,and in stream banks north and south of Stilaguamish River [, 1 TILL Poorly snried mixture of rock fragments deposited directly by the Vashorr-age ice sheet.Finer components include silt,sand.and clay in variable proportions.constituting at coherent to friable.moderately to highly compact matrix in which the coarser components Ipebbles. cobbles,and boulders)are firmly embedded.The deposit is typically ronstratifled,but aubhorsontal layering and lisstle structure are locally well developed;may contain lenses and pods of stratified sand.silt.and gravel.Thklare nn varies considerably.but typically ranges from a few- . meters to as much as 40 m and probably averages between 3 and 15 in In fresh exposures at depths greater than 1.2 m.the Ell matrix is light dive gray(5Y621 to gray 12.5Y61:da •nch till tends to have bluish-gray aspect and weathering of the uppermost few meters typically has produced a matrix coke of olive(5Y 5-3)to buff(2.5Y 6 41.Till stones are commonly subangular to subround.In addition to rock types derived from local bedrock such as greenatone.phylllte,schist,and gneiss.stone lithologies ago commonly include granitic rock types derived from southern British Columbia.indicating glacier transport from considerably north of study area.Examples of the(Vashon)till are exposed along Interstate Highway 5 immediately north of the Stiilaguamish River and north of the Plkhuck Creek crossing.Other good exposures of the (Vachon)nil are located along seacliffs,for example.on Whidhey and Cananu Islands.southwest of Lake Hancock and on the east side of Eiger Bay; at Kinney Point on Marrowstone Island, and near Point Wilson.north of Port Townsend Figure 3-18-Legend for Surficial Geologic Map of the Port Townsend 30-by 60-minute Quadrangle,Puget Sound Region, Washington, USGS,1989 August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company i 49 Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland.WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number: 921094026 ✓forecrwn .. �' ' yaps CD t OJ r099'^ s R01y1' Qom Part Teaes% •�, • t• F7 �l- 1 7 OP .\7-• Qo t _ca t oat �'• OCt `Opel 'C •�Omr r ut $ HJ g Qb� uc•. 1'. l s g_.; . .•pY Opus C7 44t -® ' t� oq T 30 N '!,'. era • . .. •.r - „‘4412..0 CC tr ; t" • •tear• 09Pc\ r C;t '1 ''1'• _ Qid, '. , '1,y .:' °'• .:. 4 •"SAPPROXIMAIELOCATION s9 �, E R ' a9t ' ' . OF SUBJECT PROPS_RTY °9'.'I t _ ego's. r, �� t' Em, • a a. Zo . YOtr �S- 1_ Opt taco, O E y — �`.c oa1fp � •-... i - '•:, .r ` .1 Poi' b . '3Yt t } •• t•Q ,r -o-°9° ' .Ev E .•�IA N104. a* Fr•'rraNa '� z l� Oga • r. •Em, ?eitPcil •••. Opue t, OW .. i•• } ":",,:t.- Oa r'A , E ,,/ ,r 13oy.• T29N`r 7Q r, �/,pY� 1 W �_ p� OE'^' 7�` ,.y ',�I r ��� -�y- 1. `'0g1 _ ` �,'...p 0�� A C1Cd^O'm1 O • 1 � \ 1 �. J u r'01 P aEre /i ." II'Es� �`EY� 'Gp l� ��./ O Emq fm{ak- \w S _ pa 4 oc , , W , .y1� r h �,09. Evr r 8 T• a V 's NO Er r Ern ti Oga m Em=�ry .. '�Oa {Yp��• '' `v��\000 . `.\ Oa , i4 • co ,� T j yE--.. „a Eioa EFRCM THE GEDLG,1° -,'"„Ii;MAP OF'WASHINGTON STATE,NOR]WEST QUADRANT•WDNR.20021, `, o Figure 3-19-From the Geologic Map of Washington State,Northwest Quadrant,DNR,2002 y — TIM- Unsorted,ur tratlfl rU.highly compacted mixture of coy.sill.sand,gravel,and boulders deposited by glac a ice:may contain interbedded stratified sand,silt.and gravel.Includes part d,the Vachon Drift undivided. Advance outwash-Glaciolluv al sand and gravel and lacustrine clay slit,and sand deposited dunng the advance of glaciers. sandy units commonly thick, well sorted.and fine grained.with interlayered coarser sand,grave'.and cobbles;locally contains nonglacial sediments and deposit;mapped as transitional between glacial and nonglacial. Includes the Coluos and Esperance Sand Members of the Vashon Drift and part of the Vashon Drift undivided. Undifferentiated drift of pre-Fraser age Till and outwash sand and grave: commorky oxidized or stained Qgp orange.includes part of the Salmon Springs Drift • Figure 3-20•Legend from the Geologic Map of Washington State,Northwest Quadrant, DNR,2002 The Geologic Map of Washington State, Northwest Quadrant was prepared at a larger scale(1:250,000)which makes it difficult to show small variations in local surface geology. This geologic map suggests that surface deposits on the subject property are glacial lodgment till deposits; however, field studies conducted by SNR indicate that the surface deposits in the eastern portion of the subject property are sands, most likely fluvial deltaic sand deposits that may be associated with the Sumas Stade minor glacial advance or possibly Vashon Stade age recessional outwash deposits. These sand deposits do generally overlay glacial till deposits that appear to be cemented at depth (they are a very compact diamict of silts, clays, sands, and gravels). The glacial till materials do include what appear to be large concretions; however, upon closer examination, these "inclusions" are primarily volcanic glass and may be volcanic tephra aerial deposits as is the volcanic ash that is also observed in this glacial till. What is somewhat unusual is that there is no evidence of preferential flows along the sand/till contact observed on the bluff faces from the shoreline nor is there any evidence that preferential flows or ground water seeps occur anywhere along these bluff faces, which may be due to the relatively low amount of precipitation in this area of the Olympic rain shadow,the slope of the property(leading to increase runoff),and moderate levels of evapotranspiration. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report 1 50 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number 921094026 — — _ o s .yI z O . 1 i ., - - r G') 1‘4\ 1.ti G y r T O ` I A 14. ,t I.gYI . .r. O d _bMMp- # 5% , it AM) r I SUBJECT — s \ -$ .s IF \ PROPERTY z„ir} SIAU '.'r ^ as e L h N PA'I i_ 1 - . 1 in....A! , .4 .. AI NC SCALE r^ FROM THE GEOLOGIC MAP OF EAST JEFFERSON COUNTY.JEFFERSON LD.M.S..1995 O Figure 3-21—From the Geologic Map of East Jefferson County,Jefferson I.D.M.S.,1995 r 0 GEOLOGIC KEY 1-1 x ARTIFICIAL FILL Fib BEACH SAND & GRAVEL Hd DUNE SAND Hf FLOODPLAIN ALLUVIUM Ha ALLUVIAL FANS HS SWAMP, MARSH & BOG DEPOSITS Eg EVERSON GLACIOMARINE DRIFT V rd VASHON RESESSIONAL OUTWASH IN DELTAS Sc ALLUVIAL FANS V ro VASHON RECESSIONAL OUTWASH IN MELTWATER CHANNELS ” .7.7,: ,1 VASHON ICE-CONTACT STRATIFIED DRIFT vi r- l VASHON LACUSTRINE DEPOSITS Vat VASHON ABLATION TILL V i t VASHON LODGEMONT TILL Vao VASHON ADVANCE OUTWASH Figure 3-22—Legend from the Geologic Map of East Jefferson County,Jefferson I.D.M.S.,1995 August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 51 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 r 1q li1■Uvt 1 >- , 32 Ova r 3 , G7 r I ®1 p Tq r Ovt A o J va rte,■ o .o■ "". I LU "t ` Cb T 30 N C..1 t cc Tsb 11T Fr ova \ T 29 1V 0 t 5 T >• , Ovt Tsb = C tsu-u z , '-% QTSb I NoduLa — 4 mr Ti . �,r A ( p0'L7Lt CO ' p Ova , ,\Cvr `=r '''° J ' ' : r es , B /-G. +sue/ B, o Q -f3 0 ,r- •` Qvt r Tsb Ova N Qvt Qvr b__ r ' I CD APPROXIMATE LOCATION r' y OF SUBJECT PROPERTY 1 , \: ` ' aa-- Cb I E • .∎69 1 0 I 1 CM C) r Qvt ^r 1.1.2,11.2D - r ■ t / Tsb 72 rAv? I~ i/ F'oi.rt.t r� Ovt F eb 3 Cva is ,/ 0 \.\\ 1- -"Tsb K't,•LTt.ay Potei.t NO OO,',L N R I ' • P4!''HE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY WATER SUPPLY BULLETIN NUMBER 59.PLATES Figure 3.23-From the Geologic Map from the Department of Ecology Water Supply Bulletin Number 59,1994 Based on the field activities conducted by SNR, including the logging of the bluff faces along the eastern shoreline of the subject property, the Water Supply Bulletin Number 59 geologic map may be the most representative of what the actual surface deposits are on the subject property. This map and SNR's studies suggest that a relict glacial meltwater stream may have passed through the subject property initially depositing sands and gravels in a relatively high energy environment and eventually depositing sands and pebbles in a lower energy environment as the source water for the stream apparently began to diminish and eventually ceased to exist. This geologic map does suggest that there is an anticlinal type fold present immediately north of Nodule Point with a southwest to northeast axis. The Bedrock Geologic Map of the Port Townsend 30- by 60-minute Quadrangle also suggests that there are several west to east fault traces in the southern portion of Marrowstone Island and that a north to south fault trace is present through Oak Bay. However, all of the geologic maps suggest that the dominant surface deposit on Marrowstone Island is glacial lodgment till,which is also associated with the northwest to southeast trending drumlins on this Island. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 52 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 3. 2. 4 Geology of the Subject Property As previously discussed, the geologic maps suggest that the surface deposits on the subject property are glacial lodgment till with potential recessional outwash deposits being present in a northwest to southeast trending band that rn coincides with the geomorphology and topography of the subject property. However, these maps also do not reflect changes in the geomorphology(and drainage)on the property due to human activities that have been conducted since m c) European settlement of this area began nor do they reflect newer geologic information based on LiDAR imagery and seismic and other geophysical work that has been conducted since the existing geologic maps were prepared. As previously discussed, the ground surface on the subject property has been modified by human activity including historic clear cut tree harvesting activities, including relatively recent tree and shrub removal activities (that occurred sometime after 1990 and before 2002) in the northwestern portion of the subject property. Additionally, there is a a manmade stormwater drainage ditch on the subject property that follows the topography of what appears to be a relict Z 0 glacial meltwater channel,which is also where the recessional outwash deposits were encountered by SNR during the field activities that were conducted on June 6, 2011. The surface deposits observed on the subject property by SNR during field activities, including the excavation of 73 sample plot test pits and the logging of bluff exposures along the eastern shoreline, suggest that recessional outwash deposits overlay glacial lodgment till in this area depth of at least 60 inches throughout the area where the relict glacial m meltwater channel is located (Figure 3-24—Photograph of Bluff approximately 150 feet North of the Southeast Corner of the Subject Property). However, based on observations of the bluff faces, it appears that the recessional outwash o deposits"thin out"to the north and south of the recessional outwash channel with glacial lodgment till being exposed at c, the surface in the vicinity of Disney Road and approximately 250 feet south of the southeast corner of the subject s property. As previously discussed, there is no evidence of any ground water seeps on any of the bluff faces SNR observed; however, what was somewhat unusual is that unsaturated zone flows were not observed along the contact with the glacial till and overlying recessional outwash deposits or along the apparent contact with what appear to be lacustrine deposits that underlie the glacial till materials(and are observed on the beach area east of the bluffs). The surface water drainage on the subject property has been highly altered with the excavation of a stormwater ditch to move storm water diverted onto the subject property through the relict glacial meltwater channel and ancillary channels that were apparently excavated to address ponding caused by the placement of the excavated materials on the upgradient side(west side)of this ditch, creating a"dike"effect preventing natural drainage from entering the relict glacial meltwater channel. These changes to the surface water hydrology can create areas that appear to be inundated wetland areas; however,test pit excavations and observations on the bluff areas strongly suggest that near surface ground water is not present anywhere on the subject property. Additionally, none of the soils observed during the field studies, including those that are in areas that can be "inundated" with up to 8 inches of surface water, were saturated nor do these soils exhibit the characteristics of soils that have been saturated. SNR's research and field studies suggest that there are no observable geologic hazards located on the subject property. LiDAR imagery,topographic maps, sample plot test pit observations,and the observations made on the bluff faces during field studies suggest that at best, these bluffs are somewhat prone to minor mass wasting caused by wave action undercutting of the toe of the bluff slopes. Additionally,the diversion of Jefferson County MS4 stormwater onto this property is a questionable activity because this storm water is considered to be point source storm water, is conveyed in a county MS4 system, and is diverted onto private property into a ditch that is impacting the surface water hydrology on the subject property. Additionally, this ditch system does not meet the requirements of the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, Ecology,2005(SMMWW). August 25,2011 Copynght©2011 SNR Company 53 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number: 921094026 C7 , - 1 U Hr , I " 0 —SURFACE DEPOSITS W C9 O rr xy.' CCy . r ›- ' IGHER ENERGY DUTWASH DEPOSIT C.7 —UNDERLYING SURFACE DEPOSITS 14' O LACIAL LODGMENT TIL J . O J ✓ CO3 4 yyT! rgn nn ro -4-- " Figure 3-24-Photograph of Bluff approximately 150 feet North of the Southeast Corner of the Subject Property,June 6, 2011 Personal communications with Ecology, 2011 suggest that the only reason Jefferson County does not have a Phase II Municipal Stormwater NPDES permit is because the County does not have any unincorporated areas where the population density is at least 1,000 people. However, Ecology made it clear that one of the other reasons Jefferson County is not required to have a Phase II Municipal Stormwater NPDES permit, is because Jefferson County has agreed to adhere to the requirements in SMMWW. The stormwater conveyance on the subject property and the diversion of storm water onto the subject property from the roadside ditch on Baldwin Road have affected the surface water hydrology significantly enough to cause surface water ponding which has resulted in the growth of vegetation that prefers wetter soils and ponded areas. However, as previously stated, this does not create near surface ground water hydrology conditions (saturated soil conditions), nor can saturated soil conditions naturally develop in this area due to the geomorphology, sedimentology, and stratigraphy of the subject property. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Welland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 3.3 Hydrogeology ° Hydrogeology is a specialty area of geology that focuses on ground and surface water, including the ground water/surface water interface. Hydrogeologic studies are required to interpret the hydrology in the study area, co especially the ground water hydrology that is associated with saturated soil conditions (which are essentially ground water aquifers). The Washington State Licensing Laws, pursuant to Chapter 18.220 RCW, Chapter 308-15 WAC, and m7 Chapter 18.235 RCW, require licensed geologists and hydrogeologists to conduct these studies, regardless of any ° licensing board policies, which is why SNR's licensed hydrogeologist has conducted these studies and contributed to the geology, hydrology, and hydrogeology sections of this report, and has signed and stamped this report as is ° required by the Geologist Licensing Board. Hydrogeologic studies can include subsurface studies to study the aquifer characteristics and may be supplemented a with the installation of wells, piezometers, or tensiometers to allow more detailed studies of the aquifer characteristics. In lieu of installing piezometers or other equipment (due to time and budget constraints), an onsite hydrogeologic investigation was conducted that included geologic test pits and test pits associated with the sample plots that were < excavated to depths of 30 inches below ground surface. SNR also logged the bluff slopes which had profiles of up to 0 20 feet above sea level (the studies were conducted at approximately 6 feet above sea level). If near surface ground c water were present on the subject property, it would be present on the bluff slopes that are the lowest areas ° topographically on the subject property. However, SNR also conducted research to determine if there are reported c incidences of near surface or artesian ground water in the vicinity of the subject property, including the review of well logs for water wells located in the vicinity of the subject property (although the subject property does have a well, the ° well logs for this well were not found in the Ecology database). e Although well logs are usually not prepared by hydrogeologists or geologists, they are usually prepared by licensed well drillers who log the materials encountered during drilling activities and also include data pertaining to the ground water that was encountered during these drilling activities. The logs can provide a generalized description of the subsurface materials in the vicinity of the well and also provide information on the ground water. By comparing several well logs in an area, generalized subsurface interpretations can be made for the materials that are present when the wells were constructed and the characteristics of the ground water can also be interpreted. 3. 3. 1 Department of Ecology Well Logs SNR obtained several well logs from the Ecology well log site using the well log mapping function (http://apps.ecv.wa.gov/wellloa/)to locate well logs in the vicinity of the subject property. When wells were identified in the vicinity of the subject property using Google Earth Professional,the PDF files of the well logs for the wells that were selected for review were added (if the actual well locations could be determinedt2) to Google Earth to create a well location map (Figure 3-25) and the well logs were reviewed and interpreted by SNR's hydrogeologist for subsurface geology and hydrogeology purposes. Unfortunately, the Ecology well log database does not include every well (or other subsurface borings)that have been drilled in the state (especially older wells). The well locations are approximate at best because Ecology utilizes the Section, Township, and Range system (public land survey system — PLSS) for placing the well log locations on their database maps and also because many of the properties the wells are being drilled on are undeveloped and do not have USPS addresses and the PLSS is the easiest way for drillers to locate the wells. 12 Unfortunately,many of the well logs do not include addresses for the properties where the wells were installed and the section map locations given on the well logs(some logs are missing this information also)are often not very accurate. Therefore,although SNR knows the general vicinity of where the wells are located, there is not enough information to allow SNR to accurately locate the well on Google Earth maps. August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company 55 Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 - However, the well log data that is available typically provides enough well logs for an area to allow a hydrogeologist to o interpret the subsurface conditions and to interpret the hydrogeology of the area. This is how SNR's licensed hydrogeologist obtains information on the subsurface materials and ground water aquifer when borings and °, piezometers are not available for study on the subject property. co o The most important reason for studying the hydrogeology of an area is to develop an understanding of the subsurface °C hydrology,deposits(including potential aquitards), and overall stratigraphy as it applies to potential wetland hydrology. o >- In many cases, ground water hydrology is the only significant source of hydrology that is present in the area being = studied, such as areas with aquic conditions, which are typically required for hydric soils to develop. By studying the to hydrogeology of an area, more data can be collected to determine if wetland hydrology is likely to be present in a study z area during the growing season, especially to determine if soil saturation is present at a frequency and duration a sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for >- life in saturated soil conditions. co o Figure 3-25 shows the location of the wells that were interpreted by SNR's hydrogeologist. The well logs that were J o included in SNR's hydrogeologist's review are presented as Figures 3-26 - 3-50. These wells include those that are CO closest to the subject property and are believed to be most representative of the subsurface conditions and aquifer characteristics that may be present beneath the subject property, co C/3 .0' ` ' 1. i }I ( f {� '�* e.en,Well 1, �. •• •1Aj/-fy^. .. .r AY ...ID. _ Teo Pan W.11 41i ' 41i ib, 1 IIYI.n'W 1 (,bow+<e..( A L D."". ell ' 4 l . .«.. - j ., Y , B w.,Z We,n weu nn.o tywn 441U 0111:Ile #r. cp r• �r��.l.en w.11 y 0 D. wNl .'� Dlnwn W.11 G �.mme,Well ` ❑ .� ,- _ ❑ � MI:er Well•YCllk'Well COai ell . I. .. .l ('«6., ouVn.Wail ° Mo ri.t 4cJavn'We. .,oGoogie- Figure 3-25-Approximate Water Well Locations near Subject Property,Google Earth Unless the well logs provide a physical address for the well location, the well locations shown on Figure 3-25 are approximate based on the PLSS locations given on the well logs. One well(the Avery Well)was given an address that suggests it is located in a different section than is listed on the well log (and on the Ecology database), which may be an incorrect location documented by the well driller or Ecology. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 56 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nord land,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number 921094026 VP O r.o.tamo ao,1 coo Cop,.to, [sweet*of EcoSoos WATER WELL REPORT MOUE WELL LO.a AIM' 99/ r Meow Copy-°slow•CoPY STATE OF WASHINGTON C/I) Ipp,e cp.,--(1.11kw•Cops It) OWNER: 4....,14;(eZ/A.: .S.- --.: am.//0140eetli.ba Amo,.. 7IA4.7.11,coa,,,,:.6.,;,: sticao 0- 0 a. 12) LOCATKIN OF NEU.: as^ Zi-It":1-..e/3.40i • ..' s IN _IA Ilso_2_T .,.... k,A /IE.WM 0) rli IX pari STREET ADDRESS OF witu.synlowl oOloolga Atkiel■10...ii,c g i t d h e.4 f A a = 0 GI) PROPOSED USE: 155. OWIPO‘ OeksiOSO u 011sonooml ,_ (111) WELL LOG or AMANDONMENT PROCEDURE ofiscommoN 1 inpoor I DolYsto, 154110•11 I_ Caw :1 Fmom ONefon Ps coke.csonow.Ms•,•IPPos sod vo,..6.■•no p-oproinssodowaro Ca tad p.,IsPa ma••akin,ol Pp MONO in so*Pio.,worm*ion is Woo on epos Ow oscn Of so•NP ol wsPoolloo 2) ...- (4) TYPE OF WORK: C.."."l'A"04'0'NO . -C 0 0.1.•■E•••,10•1. WM.& _ ) _ MU To -•C Aalletinme i ..•••..., il WW1 04_I Soros I- C Opardiroe C Caibis,5 C***0"n J9ZPAYTafit& 0 a 0 Papapvveonisd I ..44P3 LI ,p4 4!Leda 4114,!er A. 7 c 0 (5) DIMENSIONS', OWNS*t/.. p MOUS iaW ■ ' c P. Or 47. r-.,-, /CS WY Norh n,wrong*II .esp...: . 0..... ..,_,,,•••. 1,1--.. • o E (8) CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: 6. / - ge.e.54%61, 1ker>/11/11, .28 -AZ- 0 Cooing Inollyikisk er„ ' NW imam i•a ■a i 7.3 a CGNI.,sonti go ..3S' 4.. 10..0.1 - OW MP Al ; -=‹ 050 ..N ,,,, v = 4..• '6 .rot og PIE,I1401101011 SUE a/0•1111111kI4 al EN wer Cay.s- cic y i'r YO 33 .2 64ey Crerg, (-ck v 9: /-,J-- O ,..0......... F a C a ilett Y a 4 nee floeY (.2 4; ea _ NKIROws Mon i le : kaYar.,...vt,ftefue,41,aviez_I-Lr Ilk Pe'1 i 9 9 m GI perAwboa RR A t/ Lear aft". siiit.46-4,6.-- /sb- 0 FS Saw*: Fo—ITN— No In a6"/CL/L P ) /5 _ CI uanosormrs Rim I— a, T,, 71.eNae,i. *tiekicr . AMIN/la - 0 5 1751*ow. .009 kw /45" a• "-0 a ______ . 0 >o llon SU PM- .--OPITI--k* 11, 310.--- --. ________ -•C .e. Gni.*peek•C Ws 0 No12, 150.1505•51 rn 2 Gra...■ria/oe Pon _ 4 N_ .s. .. r- ' 160 - Smoel"on soww Re Ns 0 _TT:_i__ K a r _______.._. - - — 1- INS sos ores motor.isosollais POMO MIN 0 No lif i. n• 0 — Z In.a*ow Depashiesle II-- Li .... Wired 01 runny stem al, agg. tfi — g (7) PUMP: momia-2,•/3 NW* 13 `row _ _ • cr, (11) WATIR MIMS: U.N.AN'•.W.P4^0,49e9i, es----, a Weolt PM*, 5--2-3 .,• C o-ssiomo__if...2 C• ,, 0 9..ac lerat ro' ft polo.sop owes Om G-/9-111P. Z •01•101111~we In Fit o upon owl% Om_ WELL CONSTRUCTOR CERTIFICATION: 8,3 MONO*lbw•cOOO:0110 Iv I construe.*on&ea mewl roopavostry tor coosT.octo,,øi 11 a*Aga.ad It La Ogg.4.-.-av1 cornWanat van 411 Was:Knour*BE cons•mcison voosckpOs Mosonols,tose ow to Inloromben olOorto0 Waive,.MA to'IN WO knoorleope ore,hold 0 (5) WELL Inn: ONN•door N anocunl soar Wool i.kismoultokossi8ke•Pol .6C. W15 is&POW)mote VS i[ 141.1) 11rES.by ohm? ypip a•3— oo 1 1ms.on l 7-0/415,24) . . C a Xle It diaRloon Aso •11114" roa. f. . - AFIkv.../427 /re;?,Er4,7,445.,y, „911-5.8.2 . .. . No m...477_ r I LOP,so Rasa"emaryn.taw No son aeartomp bone/ery Oar lour memos@ bammil S'"13 lop*NKR INW el) Tote ‘Iolog lagol Two Wow uNK Tem Illiler Loa 0 CO,*Odli'll at frirMc..ac-,..19X4V. ow -c I— (USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY) CYR 05 RO sm.,log..r..S 0..,...oils 65'. M.~Ow Ow_f___"s• Palm ----- pl'min se own ma — gg.kw "--.— vp. EC04,71 IS 5,1 LOIJP COOccl Lindy and AIN,:nahve Anon nrop4or,I on spa. Cal OCCOffanOclaton needs,COrPaci ONa Pik*(4450.0565 P'Oireln at(706) Anwania. itim Om Toropovilwo el••■••• WO•OININIKA sn•ON14 oisslol Vs*>q No 121 407 6 . TOO l'aaar a`7°61 4074008 EC•DSC,A 1$97.i••I 0 0 Figure 3-26-Boaz Well August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report 57 I Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nord land,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 >- e• CD 0 Or Spinal And?Int Cops wan. ..tarlownt of Zook*, WATER WELL REPORT aPpUssalua Ito ■I :and COO,—Owner's Cola, Id Cep,—Dt-dlar a revy— STATE Of WAlIZIWOTON Pomo.No 0 .„ __. 1JJ T.3 (1) ow rtia N.,,,. .EA.t. A.w. ....._. Add. 23o 6°.,,vi.,,, e'4 6 Al. A6,i ix.' L .. e% -- C0 0 O. (2) LOCATION OF WELL: c......0 0 Of - : 5 ".Se . 9 T 19 H. a/16-.WM ix so,11no sod distance(tog ovestiou pr..eemwen Carnal _ CC I C I = (3) P R O P O S E D USE: u o m•e u v el taeweinal 0 a c e a k e e e 0 (If) W E L L LOG: 5 7-di C 1)C 1 3 7 hi 13 11 Onowoo 0 Test Wed 0 Ochof 0 romouos.Doembo by cow'.~sew.for.Of iontertet earl iltouessow.awl sheer Skfefeesof of octagon sod Ill.boot And%atoll el the matonal Ps eat* moron pntelavdest,meta of moo or woof tot•Ohii Iliiiallell ed Ihrhadinah. = 12 (4) TYPE OF WORK: `=""'"""I'•" 6 .. . New well 14 NIAboa.Dos 0 woe 0 NATIONAL ..." 11011 7.'"I TO CI c DeNNINAI a CANN a miser 0 ,,, /4,.../1_ : ct i 1 O x.....rt....0 now,0 ,....4 0 &,?.. Or..arcs/ e/.(o•.•.4 b..Id.e_s... I ; /7 z c ' if A J'A.J s.../1•111,....s1,12 ce...-1.11_47 . IS 4 0 (3) DIMENSIONS: avant,of well TO MHO et) • D. DANA et oimpiebed..0.1 rt,_ _-.11. f la , - c .y r la ›.- E (II) CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: ...''1, y i 0 0 or, Cuing installed: (..-0....ft... C? ..et.is 24._tt. --I — • 0 C ..., *molded a ...r.--arm inn?,-JAR le 7C_ril a - - —I 0 Welded a — -- OD Z ret1011101111.11: y.a 0 ek,x LLI r) type ot parterulor weed --. ..-- - — CID 15 ..' .,... c _ co, 2 ft. as ... _1 CI Screens: y,,,ai so 0 , Kantatoem war ..rizA2i.e. ar 0 = ...... S . ZIA size..-tfrefewa .„1.1 n,se-4t.L.et. S. CO Meal 0• Gravel packed: vim 0 we• sue ei egynE--—---- .. —.....__ ,..._ _ .- Gravel plead won Sadie! Sad: Yea eit Ne 0 ,To TAN ygAN) . — i." Matsnal used to Deal..AP rso tic r eilly Oil_16 Ws 9Z 0 ma any strata canton taitalliibie wader, Yea 0 T4011 - , Z - Method of sealing rm.off... — . -.. cn 8 (7) PUMP: temmianures,Nene . . . .... ._ — '0 1590 ._ __ „----__„_____ • - - S: .6.14=ourocoZto4tr.o 742.._o , I 01) WATER LEVEL Woos we i ) ” i ft.Dekm ws,of NCI i.e 6/gait- _ O Arteelan prewar. .Ite.per num Inch Dale . _., 0.1 aromas wasat a oentevalsti be . IC...valve *le I _. lin 0 (9) WELL TESTS: aneeme Is suwattl venom level is teeniest;NNW @tette level Wort Allartea .. wag a aamp Una made. Yes 0 1We al If pm by Neon.? al en WELL DRILLER'S STATIDGENT: e Y mkt --_ gal/nun with ft.arsenate are, 5 " TOY well ass drilled under ay jurisdiction and this report is 2.. " • - true Is tIsa boil of air k000lodoe nod WWI 2. „.....,, TI.a.■ ilune laker so we wow Joey Weed dal Lwow level Si nuosureo 1 tont nen top se wattle WSJ ',am. j r •. P...,11..,v Aft, 0 ?me New Ler I.I INfte Wow&awl Too row Lcoo •••••■•••■ trams.Am.of NIIWNMAN ,ITP•.,Isnot. -• P. i l°/ 4:71.1..p.,. 44., i eistZ...,..iiir of . .. . ... . . Date Ialii .. Balks test Js gal Moto will, 0 W.dresidon.ear..2 we - iiiii'Orin«. AMMO,her TbmPeromare of gravel.9 1 w..it Chemical enolyela amyl ía.13 N•I Um*,Ple.--.0.5.arr . .0ele.. 1/.4/ ,19./0 .use ADDITIONAL morn et NINCIDINARTI Act 01o1-20 illr•2 Figure 3-27-Avery Well August 25,2011 Copyright @ 2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 58 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 o WELL REPORT -- - y File hmen! and ells[C.el'Dodo WATER WELL REPO rlr 1 D e Origin or rd FUn! Appbaaemr N.: 0 Third Copy-..Owner Copy Third Coo!-Driller'•Cory RATE OW W1IIMINOTON Petit we (I) OWNER: Name . . CO Aaw`., f "3_. 2.3.4.. ..., «�.e. ..... .. v) (2) LOCATION cA.•tr- -- - -�.r !'fw+S�reir.see./._._ T.�.�I►.x..ate W.M. O Bearing and maroon from eeeuon or rebel r r 4•-'-s s m.ID (3) PROPOSED USE: D.CMle Industrial ❑ Steal❑ (10) WELL LOG: ITI IreyaWn U Tee Well U Other ❑ I rmation.Desteif•Ire tuba clvarte•.t12. meterlat and so-ern....and 0 Beale IIMCane,of dower,n lb.nA kind and nl the',tweeter M each v (4) TYPE OF WORK: aN•r.t eenetenred.will at tea., One entry'nr each change of fcwo...1M . I- Lrnrra number of well .-- ------- � t mare�Ytan.rte, .� - -- _ MATiR1At. MOM TO 0 N Now well gr.- Wed.Dud fig a ',/ p••p•••• a Cable !>' Mew a __ n -.J 7) 41... Reconditioned❑ Rotary U Jetted C tt •< C Litt) O (5) DIMENSIONS: ttaln•ter Of won _ _ _ C onou.c-Lill R. pytl of tomelererl rill.�3 _...-.^. ��,•r&' / . ~ 3 ? a (6) CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: - - Z CII � E C.ais{ intttlltd: 6_.•'m...from d R.te2 . n n..4.d n _.--_-mem,•■® - . fl.te • n- A rr w.dedlf UMW Remo R. V 2 tD Periuration.: Ye NC.❑ - y� Q. - / `e lox. < t Typ•Of pereontar use_ -.L�i'l T- - o ` StZt of paremasiona a b --[�-.•_--'Ea i— Al ./yy O _._.._pebratoae n,b�I'+r/'..- n. _- ✓� , '7 ._._....wwbanmr Dom ... _.h.r_..�fb_-_n. —' 0 CRlpe.Oan.Wm . n.r.._.._.._...-N. +4�f.a.e_• -. , r - 0 CU — m as Screetaf: Ye a NO d"- l _ . _ MX _ • 0 _. r • o Type--._. _...._'- Medal No.. .. --'_ "TM I Dtu.... tit tse Dane. . . R r..�__.n. -- ' - ./- -. -- PL r. - w 0 ,r YIMam _. ...._tort the ..Owe _ R r--R _ _.. 2.1 ›` Gravel picked: Ye c no er slee at cr...t:__....__.-. .. (iI C Greeal ple•ed Owm __.... rt.te ___—.___...-6 a- Settee teal: Yn lan"...-NO To n•i de Nt L - rts Material deed In sew . ..__.-._. - - - . S Met any oarau contain Mnaoble water? Yes Ile ea _.____.-.-..De1Ml•t 6nte.. ...._..�___. V a. - .— M- T)ry!of ratan, V`sL 7 19._Method of waling meta aft..__ . Z - - -.. -- - y (7) PUMP: wra.r.ettser'aNaea _. .. ....... .._.__..... - -OEt11R111Eki Of E£OkOEiY-- - tTip.: .- N.• ........... - SOMIIKSi-REOWf*l Oft .____I___- L (8) WATER LEVELS: 'b Ve� � ... - _---- >„ �r -- Stade level/ e Ale - -.It blow top of well Dar..-x _- _- nrtealan ammo lb.per tetlee trial Dote_._.�.-..__.. .. O Artesian water is controlled by ... ICkO vile.•rot--.__._ (lJ (S) WELL TESTS: bra�ad°owb�tov° tli:�er level le // /� '- - - i pr See Work•armed.. G =...7 1a7,C•aapt••••.. +./.7......_..to O Mr•pump teat made Yea a No❑ If Yd,by whom. •• Yleld_ pl./min with n.ar•wduwn after re WELL DRILLER'S STATEMENT: C Thin well was dNlod under my )urisdicrron end this report Is EE - - true to the best of my knowledge and bel;el RI hrrtnea nary Fume taken ac zero •re Mel eery Weed ell, Irslr MY RI a.earu.•eA tt, wed!•,o w roar Nwll R /. }j yge bit r},,. Q i■m• R'ot•r Lewl .:ne wain LawA nee rare LMi RA)11L./ • .rife V ille.b c aI:MI-I Crypt oeheri . 0.1 rlrwaOa r • _. _ Dearer.. .Q..U....1,�...,.7. Sao ...U./-- 7 ._.._. ... Dole el rat N /7 - OlIgoodl- � fs eager teat`.-t. 1/mf Win. It 1r wecrn after ...Aso S 1 el:pn •r, 7nhM+•Ntfe K r•ur we a rlamf<•.ansifan trued/Tea M. N._ .- _..... .. Date 6 —/4 ..1 Cet ADDMONAL.milt rr IftCIMA*Y> s.r.N..str-os-rx•e..4411. • Figure 3.28-Beam Well August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 59 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 CD O D p Dtment f Snot rr Cop>peon WATER WELL REPORT ApP8oO0n no Second men.or CCO1ofr Third D0000r01-Driller`o coal. 8TA14 OF WABffiNOTON Permit N. 0 W (1) OWNER: N.11/10 Ba tRogtAt. _____ .nark. ,A02-.?88 Ci&s1 hQ/i,, Ray.h/n,99$90 co a (2) LOCATION O!r WELL: c ....r 9 T 9 h.n.tfay M Y,.J2l�ifr�wtl..------. f yx 5 xe,, r IC CK ne.entn and dretarmt front Yetlon or tubwo4le laser CC 0 = (3) PROPOSED USE: Dorman Y :.acute D IdsaNlpe p (101 WELL LOG: - 3 lny.aon 0 Tani Wall O Other O rormauon-Deacnb,ey Atm Monacan aue of mate.%al ena nirtcfsrr.etd `r .ante IMr5nrar of etwfm ad rho Mod end wniare of IM wten.l In AA stratum MMrWed.Wet Y leek one MOW IM men Amy.of far.eMIn. _ ,rn (4) TYPE OF WORK: n1 wean pen m u,Wee - Y -- L � �[� s1ATZR1Al. ADY TD 0 C Ne= 0 method:Cols � MIAs Q dY1e .�n..l ---- -{ Q = 0 R.MP itmtd O 1017❑ k0r.s 0 Q p (5) DIMENSIONS: Diameter of..0 lelt a� -. - MY. _ __ _i__ _fir `d Drilled GA rt Depth of ooropl.red re114+2 ........_i1 __L nr �!�� /Iya)Af+'e r • --- Y E (6) CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: I'0' C�7�lif � fn'�7 I v.C7 w Casing installed: . -ch. hunt 0 e'1 _ •. •I = .1 i t� _ o C Threaded U Mal.r ee lJ n w .�iCQ n ,_,- ' V I J Wolded Q "t>ue G.1 ..._Z. n to N •- �e 7 VV t{l 5 - 0 *.• Perforations: ye:; no, .-- • Y/7 '^' 17 .--�' W ` riTe or perfar.tor urea �r /j _ CDSIZE at w=ror.Upu .. ...r b._ _. --..._ td 7IZ2_ -- .... "V GZ - Cperrpr.mn r . ....._.... . n.M R k/ - R pertor.Oenr wm -_ft to .. -. n — C/) IL _. wrsdrmines Dorn _.... n to R. - _---'--- - _ --_.. - R ..Screens: yw v No 0 t _ - U aura_ — o de Manure rt\ • .d _ _... _� /� YodU Ne._ urge--t Cue ',let tr ./S Wm _n.ieaCi-_rL • C inrr - __ —_ M.tiR—. >� -- t _._. RGravel parked. Ye0 NON sueof si ea .... . � J,)' I _ t- er..el pitted ewe .... h.to ..__K iT Surface seal: Yet Na To-Mt Moth,12- . K ---- Mal.na:tired In PAIL niwell*#GI ►+mow^---_ '- - - - _ -_ .-. 0 Old any .ertla tcP*0a tOYYOle W.Ur' rasa Nap ZTl9e oa Waeel. ..- ..._. Dept►N nir.Y.. .__.... _ ,y4�-.�.._— ��_ Nninen at sealing Wald dr..... _.._..._..._..- - N �. -�.� . ...._ 8 (7) PUMP: N.nunclwre Name _ -.-- 1s__-. 'a Type _.. ... ._._._.__ ND_._.._._._.._ gi (8) WATER LEVELS: IJledNrtade el^'errj° M. — -. - eeo+t men.a In . . !!LL ..... -- ""-'- - Stabs MY.I 4/4.)-6;c44.41,It.Mlea•ion of Ail Defeo - - ---- -- -- -, UMuroran;renown _ 1b per squ.rt inch Dale W /ulestan water to t'MVWed b> [C.p.,.tw,oe 1 -level la O (8) WELL TESTS: D.Wda•en a am t wan tove.ed eeldw wane love. Wort .r . 0 aA;N� C Null D ref by whom, WY.vuR1D 111 nude, TY 1+ W ylelu �rmw Ain _ n.g..wd m.0 nn WELL DRILLER'S STATEMENT. �(' [pier/ / This well woo drilled under my lurluuction and this report 1s � e >p._ _ •• true to ttt. bent Of my kluyrledle and belie!. rn Ip S!/ �t n- D- flemaen data Ulm+ taken as has lien mum tweed pill .jOr IAA � rr ' mlYUrw Iron WeD top to wner.aven NAME.V.74PA�rOM.Fl11/1 .� At .. . T�wr Wafer Lwl Tuna Watn Level Tl1M watn Lori Morita ,arm. //r/�-'�_ ��ff or t rellonl rope w print) F mar// -Aft �_ /rr�?A1kYr,_..... Aearw.Ar.C�.dirllrL l�iltt*I..lr.(slai.9Fr3d� (Minted)%/ s egZ3 li nemt tml Y gal/stun.Ate. .71.dearinfoont.aJ11 _-Mt. ///��r` Iwr1 DnrwrI .. _ caw-hi ry /t/�� Temperature or Were let.We•photo/m1 aasgni.lade 10Q Ifs, License No. ........_...l�.T.t'.a..-_ Data..%ee.PA , 11 R1T lull ADOCTIONAL s1QiTS A NECLS.SAOY I llIKw e • in,o»r M Figure 3.29-Burroughs Well August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 60 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 _ _ y O Fa*Orgarf EtuY Gap,.nn WATER WELL REPORT alert -Q 7s ss' V) Dsp.nmmt q EcW.yT Tete ca C CogM s-O.nr CoOli STATE OF WASHINGTON nroo.- «•,cape LT g (1) OWNER: N.,Ne_1ON _C,i1lST_._ -- A.d•...9e ugrej$&`f iii4 ockT. ,3� - G) 0 MI ''. Cr (2) LOCATION OF WELL eo..fr-Vef erAoh/ - x7,1_.see.-./_Y-129-0 N-LE.we p SF. (2a) STREET*ODDNESS OF WELL 1a nerm.sr..el.31 D Il iSNE ryr !, �YA�6�K,t.46 pit 13rj-.. _ r- 13) PROPOSED use X 13 Y.•sh WdeurM■ i 1 Men.mini C (10) WELL LOG W ABANDONMENT PROCEDURE DESCRIPTIOt C3 DewneT 71st Wen pnyr - lorry».: Own**h tete.,clw,aw, aims or moaner and .eeetre.•o.Me -C wfrt Y eyes,MCMtee NN ware el tre event'in Ntn.4.ler leMeelo. (4) TYPE OF WORK:II,eIrtf dw .NNam me Nov ter each cheeps of aaaeenon. C W1p»a. I.KY I TO O Abend°.ld L: New*ell X Melhett Del C &Ned 0 -���",� Deepened _i COON C Drivel O -(}L?;41e{iCQsWN_...... .td'IDNM Q I J. . D E OriMd 130 D.'t•,or Depth ortdnPle�FAN r It Gl A AWN y. � parr _—a l�_ Z O_ x R (S} DIMENSIONS: __ _6_Athos. Aflr t. ! /O• ]4 _7 o - 9n1(th wood drys y ` (61 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: /N a]� M pay! ',Aver y(r y C/4 y = • C Casing Metalled: �• der.erae_._�__n.» i �y. O}t l �. 2. • .0 LawonanM_ _jig if wAftP 44 FA~ -/Z�i / O C7 _no■ Oed ._ r' . Nem Moe II.N 11. 1 XI OP.tlora(fons: Ye.0 Ile❑ O LS t ON 0 eMlbeta YpeO - - C tarn at.ene.ls. a by m. -1 C4 M00-010ae rem It IC_ -�_N. . 1 T _ - _t o • __P,NrNNe eau A.N of R _ 1 Noloo c.bom ___11.s. IL .- - I- Screen*: Yeel 1 NON - _ - '.7 VM NtN..p,NY a --TECE WED Y I,w _ —YaNIN. WED - — preln __MN Y,e. eeY__ -.__..A.to e ; .— ..- *uo-1 _ D•r.. Ike eye.____..___M. A.te p. CZ a- OrAWlp.ci.O: Ce. y __.-_.__._ • OS OS D w1N'sn et re wer Net W.t•ty 1 GNI*NevN Nei. IIqq 1 .5 no II V E� Q�T ! (- SWtacy.ed: YNM NOD Te al"'depm, 12 ___.N. - - 0 Nate ad wee wow* BeeY:r Lee .. Z Die«m Jolt.<e.t.a rwe IN FNIMI Yee 0 ea C3 - Mvp.We,Nt1 _. Noe at N.N. Nettled al**slop whet.ON ..•• -.. I M (T) PUMP: MMMetlrei$Neese ,- - -i- - I•(e) WATER LEVELS: .raw me,e ee Ntel s i 49 . eec Newel_ .. ._n Nola.tee et Dose - I I (yi /Wavier eren.. . mp per Nampa ol De.. I __4-- M Maslen Weer le eenlreW by -Tsai W...ee Il . (Si) WELL TESTS: oe•wy��'m, Wetr nM.a_�.._.._.1JC_.(._...» caeoN•ea /U' Z. 'f.ff� ppp��e .1n*/e.MNNwrea Me.olrKlrll We.a p.n.Nol motel Te SU No NYKM,teaYl 410 L WELL CONSTRUCTOR CERTIFICATION: rail.] oa/FN.NM _N 4wtr oOTOW M. -_ ------- I id CILKI n 0104 TO accept tespenrGlII Ion con.rrection el this roll •' Md at Cused nc• with alt wasounplon wee cono&ulf•on olend.rt, a '- - •• •• Mater used a 1n*Worms Non rellortM eMre are Noe to run bus. - _ _ knOMed end betty to m..ear.DON el.v.e,.ne Man purl tome WO testae tot Y..y,ei N iOAE hvsn...lap O.Loos Neal) ••t� '1 ,.w. Nrr.a.« ,w r««L.mp n« NNalwt NAME J.IO KW-Cr-tA PNAAA 4 W Nil be;0.04014. li;1 - - �( --- - "-- '- 0.04014. O.,tam. COTOOO1101e /(ne.OA mlN7 i- __ _ Ad*.n IS LS DN1A+Omd b�»E ., bate et tau__. Isd/O/i w/1�5 �Qt37Vp��fT ---- (Stetted) �OLQ V e�^._,•'w'^-^rltNose No M4/ sues Net_ Mt eel..wee l drwee..ear M. CosflcIOe•. MM.r.UEC) Airiest - en pnae,wet ette.itel St to_b-- Ns NO. as �vW IY�GY— Due., /�/Q.tai. . Me_N ll r_ OP.e. Dre �1 T«ro.•rW Nretr-._IN.chancel WteaeaY Yest„' Merl (USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IE MECESSAHy) .mash IJa 1»..n 1311. $a Figure 3-30-Cilk Well August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 61 Wetland Identification and Delineation and tream Reconnaissance'eport Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number 921094026 -- -- - CO r oorimo""°p' °°""'" WATER WELL REPORT UNIQUE WFLL ID dA t Q.dy._ O 9raM Carr-°wooed C°°7 STATE OF WASHINGTON Y fMdCOpy-OrR.r.C01Y W.N.Diem done N.. C7 Q. (1) OWNER: NYn�V/UA1.=I$c_E -.. _ —_7f..1 *8 .EIS l/i_4yOBOrANt7�LUI_ RV-5-e O y cc (r (2) LOCATION OF WELL'. ay, ',Th,./Rfx.SdV _ ''//� --� � l---sr�_�l/-�,+ .54,/,r Or I - -z 9.n ., AP-pox p d (2.) STREET ADDRESS OF WELL:c.,n,H1.m..1.Z,/ Zrei A?C/S 4'. •GOK ,Ae�0'. peas a >- 3 (3) PROPOSED USE PC.C°^"°" *wawa Nk,+odo (10) WELL LOG or AEANOOPRIENT PROCEDURE DESCR?FTION = N II ' F.N WN . Dlrw L) a°NN.) E San 4 MD d. .n/Nawrwm a.rme...,.t.rOror d YFwn U GWar me pa Nn/SV.MHA N.OM.M w PDT..a.n+trwnaao..n^WW1 a.rm•.w:t. t' 14) TYPE OF WORK Owv.+.mp.r°l«.+ Z Nwa.N.,rm,kr CI Peron nY+°v: NATLNY _ __ FROM TO C _ Z 0 A"..°c wJ - Now poi .�h Mena pop_ Bold C 7nP.rtr2 O / r CC C RednolT Teo" AJIC Nmw"* Mud 1 •_ . -"..' •F(q!.►y ..�_.. /.. .3 • (5) DIMENSIONS. ?onay..... _�T _ _ rd... . " _ -.1'•• •. 'Lek.," 3 - Y E Ur Ind._ p '+.' Dnp,d.n*pbYC wl__OD a `.- . ...-I _,_ V2- c� ` la) CONSTRUCTION OETLIbs AIn ryy.�/[yy�,',�pyy(/ � o C Camp IneLIW: (O k.m Nan'/'/ .< 13S_-a r `Ll.� �Ce ;C 4Ve— J }( - nom from N b 1 O) .,TIN adod 1 - - _. _ .- O y rn.ww ..-I nl,a nom .1D __--T !aP O I! .al co O Paarw.ia' 'no i w+A, cvy c2 y .se. 7S -a 1 edppYaa°Yd .47%40 9f .tie. C S 7F dl pwbYrns _._.— ^br -------- --R. y30 awldrNurs°<.r It_ _L /i �yC�W6E/D ita._ AS— Iv aR+ °e.U.+e...imm__. It• L )5pli/JOVQy-yeaJ_ PS- L!�JeO,- _ (a °.,+mm�.'Dom L• L P'O.y/ ,, . //E /.2 C5 • Screen.: "»X ❑ "n1N'I 45/5ro270) • , A#PO 136 / 6/8 non �(�/� M aa'.i YH I I .11 afs( A l�•.i,� T � L- C own Pal axe ton E a_ a — PS — RWiwi patod: an III vs., awd v. _. --- :DANN paced nom LA_. -- -1 _ RECE1VED . H swwa w: 1e. Vx o' B:7 Q I/aa.11edAeN� � r z Old any O.waueancn:.ea.OW, MH❑ No Di FEB 0619`.17 a _ _—. DOW N e.... — - -. MNeod N New ow..4 --.... .— —- pEPp(17Nlf lfT Op GCO;"•T" �� SHORELANOS AND WATER FASUU W..tb 1 NOSPAN• a (7) PUMP: NNn.M"Wr I Nam. err — 1 (E) WATER LEVELS:,N ....an aw wow sY der wry ._IEELL CONSTRUCTOR FlCATION -,�'. .I Say IM W .nave oS+f. __ Maw YYw.w os - O Attu,wv..ewwd.Y - co.M.umed w+d•O'edOaP1 MWocsO.N b opnynrclbn d SIs wr and r —_R'..TY*-)_--.... conyaru wen all Waere.wan w.d d rRVdan 04N.r0..WMr1aN ir.O and e.n dui nIwmalon mooned Won an WO nr"C I knO.l.4T.Wa nex.1. C (a) WELL TESTS. D..awwa DOWN awa*Me lamed asl.w NNW IMO ,' - l 0)0) woo a Tore"+.,,dodo,"o n Nog. n yN.Or ram/ NMEE J Jnwa4Sa.4e4?I•!!G 6•//r/c. C ram pi'No or_ .t e.ad..r Ago Nee - ^dla,v.,' rr.+.°Nfl1f�jp..p_.�. a) - ---- rC7a.i _Ile.ef.NO APT" Q R."orr dra pna Woo r ara rr+poop DOW M.•.r DWI moow.tl NWolo ap to• time WAN.L area. LOAD OAD tiro Wrw+a.M 'na WPM to* Conaway FO STCYCLC-.49_ K Doe 4'-13 .lofty (USE AOOITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY) CO...°raN door erol/y _lelraa WO "aS 000losseaa_�re. Nn.r mu...,dm aR -....s a a" r.1 Ewan)a an Equal Opportunity ane...Nmalrne Mon employe' For.D1- „� WTI 0� dal acccmrlodatbr needs.OOrllatt OH Waxy ROBOW Ce.Prog-an M 1206) irwwraa d er nado+ D "a 407-0E00.The TOO numbers(206)407 6006. —rM0i sr�a�+�l.P.,1 FivtD TP1T- Mr es 1 301191"••, C7A/'lor /L Figure 3-31 -Conley Well August 25,2011 Copyright 0 2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 62 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 _ CA .Md e«.raj'_‹)l`_t D De oineol Mel WATER WELL REPORT a1.oYE«.LLL..a.1V 5C- N oon4 CO of Lf oma y a.ed Cop,T-Om,.coo, 1r' STATE OF WASHINGTON eye Aip,,rears No_ ` *nr.cart-.ors:.Cw�ry i ] � a C� (� O. II) MINER: %on `e,6SS ...L�1.?(re�i11Y1W. ..,_..aYem-g2- 1aA'--11J-A..Sal`. k-111��1•.ss�yr.y • LOCATION OF WELL: +..a ••r a cab['sins✓1-. .-.. �•,..�t.s.r -1 ,.� a a LS,� a.a R1 W (b) STREET ADDRESS OE WELLIrw+Pa•OW. % C/ tAG o�4 U Mairs� e—1 c• O • (7) PROPOSED USE •on.- .ql�`J��� ,T-Sfi . k.d7 (10) WELL LOO or AMANDONO/ENT PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION I- V) n•ann- l*' ,I Wee Tee*. P�..q oleve"ivot,o eo•own aY.,,n,m a.a Owe eeeaar.yad.mew uaWVm MIEN .W 0 old' ,nSae-w Yl�r one wwin voevwd.m�,Iwn'n....ivy ab - r O tlAi.M.n� _-. ___ .. _ - (4) TYPE OF WORK'. mat Mroo Or ae+ rrtw� _— -T-E TO � C ._.o------ -— ._ _.-. O .O•+nnn.l bmam • MAW,1)061• IMP Il —.._.. — C 0.evrad -.I tit.+ o.ar/IC7 - ��--s� r -- a.• IS) DIMENSIONS n+"w da' �_- -_ - �-- Z �.e0 an Lawn of unneaNw_ -- a (EI CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: C n maed W w ' O.*♦Om4_44 J o Q' S/E dIE -3.- -- - { 41 Kl 110 _ al.hum___,- N a__ -. L w n nrarac — - OOP ewe II n _ _ -- —_ O - . AS --- _ rrPaaoarbrrr� ._ ... _ ._ .- 0 CSAW al Pe news - _ — _ an be — --IF --.. .- - N - rn a R .wbam••I. _R e> _ ____ —a - I AO rn OS — P/rvagere`ow _— _.n_ _ --a — - - N PM..n.: w.* '.11 11i ---j__—..___,_— — o .0 rAr.a.eb..MYY - �AL_]E!�i---� SbA---- - ( an Tan �'aebl� lY.•Fl.r TE of -.. .. - Osa_�/ Satan_�] _ron� LAM 4 _ --_.-_ - { C Enna _.-,as w .� .IY —L — RI Ti.eer pigeon Peon _—. a n _— _A I sn..••Y.L Yee *Mw'7 _ t11 `--N. - ---- — ' ——9.--- _ { — I.—• M,.tlaMamb. L1s11 oaT`�o. — — —_ — _ 4—�- z a ilay OP1.a re.e Ymwq•mtlw+ PP 0 w i ____--j-- _..-- lb type M.eb+ __ _DgFtl NMI - - ----- — T3 ._ ---_`- -- P) PUMP. Krvlrau'«t FWn•_— -- -_ -.'-.---_- -.- >1}T TrD. _. ._.. ILn _ (6) WATER LEVELS: piol moo eM _ w O Sol me MO V ymn.n - /. / _. — ..ere•srr... Oar WELL CONSTRUCTOR CERTIFICATION: W .-.w,.e«v,. la No mon raw Paw-- - -.. ....Pw«....pWC.1 I opNPJft•d tt& ash,r- ,n 0*'SN LbI kV WIrtINC.l Of ms ws 0 ate () -- (LA,.y.je{'—'_-- a, , nn.en.,,a:.1d above all apn.PyrboT w-calN. Marmials,.sP a"; he l..oceeaor Wolod above arw'we a my Pest ercorpcje,u.,n..r L Peep" Vo-a 1 , y( C i91 WELL TESTS: Pie'nee aam•am..b l.lel wawa.PM_aM•eeletl �.--��� - �e', � ' Ir!�/ d YINdPmPlen«A+T M.�? ROt1 Nlawq+•ae!rT— -- NAME !Sr I - /I�T C ♦ra _.__ar'.,n a.l1-.-. R—.- awr- ___1011 - Ra- rAJ.O'sL ` a Adtaask �.C -_- R _ O R.coaer, ull✓M rMnMmy d«'Ina Penile OM Maim Noel rompe.•OaM. ea I•war N+OlI Q1 To. WMp leer Lank Two Rao La Taw WPM LOAN COIINICNT'e t .- _— �— — _— RAP +.A.batdYd4 +- 6- 9- .14 - _ _ -- - - -_-- _-- (USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY) nab r Y sM win sil.._J II ala.m t alt —nom -- rra°°'°.°‘ISS — _ .R 4_ Ecology el en Cq..al Oppodumy and AR/maM.AQgn.nlploysr F0'sae. a__ —a°• -. _ Ne. crl aCcO nrnod.ldn needs.collect .e WNW R.seurces P+ograrn an,2061 pM.na.- _ _--.- Earn - aDT.S600 TCa TOO nuww.r is 1206).J7-l0U6. NmPrtlu.y.tlr _Wm.OmM*1/010/1*NOW YIP 0 N.L / Figure 3-32-Dellinger Well August 26,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company 63 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 0 O ° ; r COPY sorb,, amen a WATER WELL REPORT AN,rr,-.ltea No J inroad Cop,--Jeerer a CoPr Third copy--DmN re Cosa STATE OF WASHINGTON Pereut No __ .... ... w ..; (1) OWNER: N.m.Mik ThJ1 , r//�9/" � n..../i Aua..I�✓ri'liwrrt� ,(444'' 97351 is O (2) LOCATION OF WELL: c,,,,p,a,TCf}Nins.' ...___ ..._..-. - NW 56 s.< 1 T�QN..iJtw1 cm 0.d dewing and distance front wctlon of aubdl.l.ton carpet _.. al —• (3) PROPOSED USE use...,,,X lne.tn.a 0 t.ntraY O (10) WELL LOG: 'r IRhaaton C Ten Well p O. a Maew slackness at.gO.te.,,nut Me kind nanny of t 4..a w r i� = 7r ;rev.nur.Ln.e wn ,+veto penetrates.van et wet PO..W IN ear*eked,et ler.eNew N (41 TYPE OF WORK: -- --- -. . _. . to mar. err. MATEnUL rants T0- e C Now well 10 Method.Dee ❑ a.wi 00 - 0 1 0 4-0 Deepened 0 c.aw 10 Odle=O _arc.. top soil_ . Z O ne<ondtmned m Rotary r- held a .ffin.`.SSSId. 1 I 10 Q C Brn..-graval k make -....__ o (s) 11tlISNsIoNS: OLmetrr of veto 6 - torn«. 9TIl.-._dry sand –_ 9 3 3 -, = Dow . -.51....a Depth of completed wan 51 It layer, top of-Dleit W Whin •t1 Mr .51- • (a) CONSTltUCTHIN DETAILS: clq —_— Cuing installed: - novo from 04.:to}1 4 e. - - — lnreaded p 6[7( at..,. Irom4A.0p 2, r C4�1a n1 J welded s .a- Ia..... n.flteI n.to 2 — O to - _Dt13.1 t ■ 7 ata- .Rory--1-_. ! — _ ty t,., Perforations: Te■O Noy >aaw that r 6 ra_ TyD.of perteraLr rraed .._._._._....___..____.... __..____.._ 0 _ - _ c0.-E or panenrw. . ......_._.._ k b ...._......_...__._Y. -0 Perforations from .- n.to_..............n. C _ perfor.mn•from--- CA CO ..._pertonrtor from __n_r....-__--_-6 — J '15 Screens: Try $.g ,— 0 1a11 attr11n.1r_.GOTp.—.. co Ch Typo I_2t__. ��a.�1r� = mu. .. Ma..c1.H:aerll.. 1OA 21 - a REC O arp, _. shay ns n.... _.__.n. _....._._a Gnvel Panted: Yep LJ was aw Lent. _ ---- APR 1 fk 1984 — - l'TTJQ7 �-- R Gravel plated from ._,. ...._._a.r ..._. _. .. _.n. ( f6 I Surface seal: Year No To oboe WNW 20___ n -� Did 4.1l used to ualB41n nhl. .t It axsIIL_...___ _. - ---- QDid any aryls content unusable ester, Yea 0 NW y _ — Z Type of waters .._.. _f7------ Mwwd of..nett.b U on. • -- '. N (7) PUMP: M..r..erty.!Woe _. 1 a L.nd_..r}.ce nea.ron _--------- cm (4) WATER LEVELS: .lro.e mean .e.level._ �4aQy .e n. O suer level 43.. n Peeve top of well Otte 3/ t,64. - - Q Arteeran ptr..re the per square,nth Date U ... --- .-- ..._.. W Aateet.n water 11'controlled by ICee.osM.etc h -}— O ((a) WELL TESTS: °rpa'°.eweelo wok level wee u 2/,� p wart['WWI ill 84('Pmp1aW... 3/1-. tYV4. cam a pomp test 11.40.? Tr p No❑ Urn.by venom?- 41 !Mg' gal twt ft drawdawn star Pew WELL DRILLERS STATEMENT: C . . _ -__.. _ ° This well was drilled under my pdrirdretiorl and this repnrl is I.- e . - true to the beat of my knowledge and belies ea a RKp.eey data tmme Lien as urn when p.np barbed eat IweRM wend }rh CS matured tom well top L D welt<:.v. NAME S tote an Drilling, IV.. . Q Time voter Lewd I Time .'seer Leal I Taws Web.toped :Peron Arm.of rorpoletmr.i ,Type or punt - c, (n / 1! 7 pt.. f Mari :,?∎? Add.. YOH 161. Sonistf Ws. 9. 392 1- . /r� 4r fill �. 0 nate of ten /y/84 (Signed U _-_�/_� 1.44. / ' ._._.0 it LI. 3 S{ reed l Q�ttw J!�Gi4ev Bailer lit tort teen.will �&.n aOwdawn altar err, a_n t `o 1, 'We"united • .easy. D.L _._- 14M }(M��srTC. �'.`` Q� hmppreun of tot.49_ w...eawpkt analysts.madrr Ye.(7 Na A, License NO. 0458. . Data .L111.........1E9. I USE ADDITIONAL affECtS Q fDCB5ARY) 'a rr-r 750.1.10 ---- Figure 3-33- Dillion Well August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson 64 Nord land,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number. 921094026 -- - - Co ru.Osayinel and PIM GM Inl• CO Lesenerentent of Scenery WATER WELL REPORT Aineacallen No &wood coo,-Owner's Con, Ttled Copy-DrIltera Cope STATE or WAMMENOTON Penni,No ...; (1) OWN32114 N......6-.1.01%.14._Ket_.c 4, #V . ------ Adelson Alm•dr;si0 AP_ . a, it'pe,..caogr.da 8 (2) LOCATION OF WELL: c.i, i"E F&e.Sor...1 die5-y..C.E. IS lee.F T-21 N,RAE St IN .._ - 0 (1) &marina and<Valance hone Omit/41 or•uhdlesslon carnet CC MI (aa. 3) PROPOSED USE: Donartie A !navel/WI 0 latuUmpal I:1 (II) WELL LOG: 733 Irrigation 0 Tat well 0 Donor 0 Tansanon:Deseret by COlor.ekerneetre,Mn of••••••11 nod structure.end Maw UslelowSt of aweless and lb.knot and eaters of ca.osolenal Ix each 111111ferel plenemeed.sena sre Issue one vary for seen O.'s,*o, f oreptingt 0 VI (4) TYPE OF WORK: ;:r.',...z1r:,,,,,,I-- ...E . BTLIIAL FROM New ea1 akth od Dd 0 - Gl Scald 0 Dowelewsi 3 Cable 314, Driven 0 --''-'"Lr 700 y Bez.,. gyfrac_e_s 0—_,11___ -c c _ Amrsortlifonad 0 Non.,C .1tnad 0 ee4 kii Gin.y Cierik.a f t".I.4v4) n r 2 M... a • (5) DIMENS3ONS: ,..., Pamela,of well 6-•-,iiseb-,- iariciez..4 7 1, 4.5.,4441.01. x__.44. ..r.. smilimi $ .et Doptu at eactokqed mob---,dr- --I" sow'04 ..,,,,.57 re E (4) coNsmucrtoN DerAus: ,,_ id . . _ co 4- o Gain bundled: 4 -owls.trow/441,414‘le-.Z.1.la 66.• = C .0 Cif .0 46Cil. e -ss 1:3 73 Perforations: y.0 No A 16 TYPO of perforeVor send .. ...-- ...___, SUL of perefaratiene C 13 C 4nel et)• C) et% rn . gorteraboo. nom . _ _ . ft.la.—IL 4a I:917 . 4__ _ ru 4117. 6ctek„ 0 NII StIVNISIG y.,84 No 0 etri "'l 0.i. I- 0 KantAleetagan N A-71P.kgitgalg...kstailArAillelgit #4.1' 412e 111) ID.PAij ti" -. .0 Diem...4.8'...liat aim ilk.7. OM ..Xr..IN.Illalt.IC 4 07, . etiv G) >a -‹ ..e' i-3 Gravel pecked: yes 0 IN OF MB is vowel t------ _ 3 surf.. .1: Y. i,„Q....To"Mat 11111.1110..._ .......IL —- Ratert•l tows in sug „era . _ _ -1---••- ODR/ any rtr•ta contain amenable/ Wattle The 0 SD 0 .. ......-- z rfese of naleff. -----136/16 If same.—.— ! tn , _ .0 TAW- >. — — csi (10 WATER LEVELS: 1-'1.-v.tror.g•=". ___11 - . . .2 Matte teas 11‘3 - ...._.....tt below too et no Pale eithait,4- _ O __ .— Li) Artesian sonnet le ellaffolled by ....i.4. ...Vain. U., _..5__.. o (9) WELL TESTS: 011•••••••I.amount enter levee I. Iowans.] bolo*MAR level ----—s— ---...--— won raarted._O.C.."Tn e...d/ J•71- Competed 0:2'...2.6_....11.742. 4-• C was•sumo test made. Tea 1:1 No 0 II ya. by shoos 41 Yield: Pailedat.With n elravniceen•no, hr. WELL DRILLER'S STATEMENT': E - _____ ..... mi.well was drilled under my jurtsdiciiori and th.11 rePOri ,5 I.. - ' true to the best of my knowledge ono belle( II _ 0. Recovers Wu (time taken as awe wom mum.foamed odfl (*)W lewd t) 0•••rOd from vil top to aser levell , • Ttou Wow LI/P•1 71•I• Naas, Level To.. wrevr.1...,,ne riAmE ,-,...-Nlitt , --57. 7 .D-L4I he----• .am.or.oroorausm tigg•'oe- 0,) ..... . ... . .. , AddeeMIL . -3 .?S..., 7.0 I- - .........-.--.. .. ...... pete et ... ............. . ...._. f Signed J....-2nrae...._..44" ...... . maw wet 7.0....gal./MM.WO-Aft-ft.deawnown after_ -2...nre (Wall r• Art...um Pew . .m..... Ipso Dm. TMOI•Dr11141,11 at INT••••IPX..1,611•woraSeal analysis model Yea 01 No • License No_ 0116...0 . . Date 100.,..4........utZ,T WIZ ADDITIONAL 1110L1111 IF NICZIMAIIYI FL.:60.1-n 4111110• Figure 3-34-Tulkerson Well August 25.2011 Copyright@ 2011 SNR Company 65 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nord land,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 Tile OH Tinal and Tie*Cop,*Pin 0 Orpartment or"colon, WATER WELL REPORT Aup4.4(0Ctiu. 0/E Sensed Copy-Owner's Copy 0 Tiara Coos o•itio••Col* STATE OF WASHINGTON Parma No -I 0 (1) OWNER: H...../4Nfikr4i a co ,re__ Ada.S-765.4.4-.c.-.!.-4 &ex.49. .ktre41.140144 w 42 (2) LOCATION OF WELL: coosu _i---_. . - NI ..., sr C 0 0 9_1.■)_17.4,44'1"'4,•^"trari,Berton I..44-.n. • '"I'l.r..--Z...e.0_ :0 ._. n _ ' 0 -- -stettaiialliiiST12440,C_ Z....cl."1/1/11 0 a/ (3) PROPOSED USE: Domenic gy'sna.t.no n idi.r.R.Ipa r3 (i8) WELL LOG: r:C Ce try-Kase.9 Test Well S Other 0 Terreadoe:Defenbe Du color.tbanleun.fort of onalaniat ad Win gust,urn 0 7 iii".:WM."tr"ireradelitwatr!ZI I on"Pgrale:f t"*..anal In (4) TYPE OF WORK: L;;I:V.17:7;...1 4'44 ..--- . . ......_. MAMMAL. F11014 TO = VI N...hid s.- me....g:Dm a Owed C / ..E Oineweed 0 Glee g .'when 0 GRIOT,r S.44.14)62_t_fr iie/I•c L,/its.a, /3 Si C2 n....dickn.4 0 moms c leeleg 0 ... c 4,1„44.,v...e.), a gift, t e-h/414, y I y a- = o (5) DIMENSIONS :Manama ot well . 4,-... CC C Drilled 1 5 1 n Depth of...p1m...u_..t.r.a...._41. eii±etisizaajal_rsifway 0 - 7-1 (6) CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: RI <441)0,-BLE-- --/--alsiLVEr----34--. a.. >- E Easing blaUdled: 4•-Dime.*van I I . ft*I ns/17* " CD 16 Threaded 0 -ohm own . it.le___et. esilLa..Y....e.A.4A-4( • eiliSgrWigq S3 Vis CD '"-- %Welded TT' C - J — iv Perforations: The C.; Nei°. SAUDSrOAAC elt0A•4 TaJtacee 5'L. ' SR , ID .., w — cD 8 -- --""'b""----"."--------' elitYi_thealosenv,_crfitscre'Sort 5 7 :13 - C It eti chrp i, Icrs' emir, Scsor 104 I.2 S- cn eg Serowe y..0 N.or'" (6 - r,,,A.P/S° MCA-CRAY Starr 'Jag /so — 0 , o ti 2-1-V2-1TL. viii—trgrg_r".______ ›, Gravel packed: yes a Es c rst.Z. 4„,--- - .. ;.13.. Surface seal: v.-.ly' No U To wised*opal.--/--f--....*. . lantana]nano In sad JELTda-•Taabring....------..— —..— , .,- Did any eyes& romans unvaabl• wooer To 0 Hs- - ; ! F- TIT&at we‘br. • - - -Dee*at Mesta----___ ., . . 0 Msh.d at • ....._ _ V) 3 ______ ..--- • (8) WATER LEVELS: 111.444u4/"`.:141:41° , 4 0 a >' Relic lovas &1 . _is Wale an at eal• Dew /1/iiirAL Cn _ • Artesian pressure-.. ... ... lbs.pa,squat*anon Data - Amman toter la aselsolsed by . .. . _ . • _ O (Cop,Volvo.tie.) _--- 0 I W (9) WELL TESTS: cossosoon is amount grater Intl ta aserated below atabo level -- --- --- Melt atoned 10419. .III Se Complete),I$/ 9_..._...ILO Xlic o w‘,.I,..tamp Use made, Yes 0 No 0 If rm.by whom?.- - -- T.ein gal Man sritb II.deillailnee after Ins WELL DRILLER'S STATEMENT: c . - Thia well WaS drilled under en, Jorltelction and this repnrt is cu _ E. ' - - true to Ole best of Any knowledgi and belief, Ilit Socorro, ell. Wm* token NO an whoa pump lensed till laesiler keel inernarea from wall nee ie water tenni, NAME Ii"zar.40.SV.4.0_ ..411e...rnig.. 44■Lic 0. inns Wear,Ulna, Tana Warr Len.t! Teen Wale Libel Warw.fbil,or:rrifirairritIOU) iiii0 or MOO ' In .. . -- - --* , .-- Address.P51.4,..14- Si " Y.sr. . rof Y ado. 4.) , , I • -e .... I- uoll•It gm • (Eignedl. 42, ....1411"-$J.sed.retlis WM 7 5 fi demi/owe*Mr-.A.,..hes (NW DrIllers AresMet Sew- -.ewe IrAte sti/.1042.--..- • Tematerentre 4 water_Sr-Wm•eneeurel&mayss ulnae?no 13 Na - Ucem.ge i 6 ST ow./1.0 I LI=Am:imams ISEETS IT IalaCTSSARYI A F.Ifialti-Os-ener.4-Eli 4411114 4 Figure 3-35-Gorohamer Well August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 66 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number. 921094026 -- COD t•tbwa. O,�Im o WATER WELL REPORT; — STATE OF WASHINGTON ti r 1R..t tut tii■N __" IA - (11 OWNER:tr. SINN HAM _suss .mw 9I0.SHeYNpCk Ave N E aovN»Dir xl 98100 �, 6 o 0 0 (21 LOCATION Of WELL::aunt .tr7erson _ -,NW to SE a. •.a _ G T 29N w.al ,E wu R7 (W STREET ADDRESS of WELL d.,...N*sr)_jjpUa LOnt.ft2 WA. __ N (2) PROPOSED USE: • w...e .tsar D ...a.• : IIII MU.LOI M ANRIOONMENT PROCEDURE DN.. , M r NYW u ONY*, IMtW. 0 Ott C ea IN 1041 DW l•.rdwr►.w.al',Mum tm nc4..•..a<me01,�d..d.. to N) TYPE OF WORN: Dw•n..srdwNi ••M•imOnr..a.•s•rWerw.w+awawO.wwlew ae«gauss r+I.•. 17 al y awe rem awl 1 G7 y •t.•ad 0 IYar • Yale/ Do 0 and a MAMMAL MOM 10 j L I t.sa•.Nr C RNri o Jam/ a ern HMI*/C p) ONAENSIONI: ow*/'.... a- •a.. RmCb'Lsllf a R Orin. lOT.7,_led 0s/O,ca=argot.,MO 10,-11' as ..I'm dCY _ —_ 24, 43, Z 7B E (1 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: -� ___ .-..$b 0 Ss ert•...•wt t- -flan le s, Q' as 1O)••?I 114 I Cam--. _. _.__.101 O __. bn ER t covse sonU W/O 101 _. = C _S__".-riles,sos _ 9„$:7' t• 99{, .. •Old/ r] I 1 1- he13 0orn.GW*wim It d feel kU complete -<N Twat n _;_-Ow v. -W_1t• 09'1) a moo-w•E aNs,41 m I M Qlaao•tl.ta•N trim T aelst 0 .0 rwwrrr. It" Na • 10 ffi1Q*sow clown ____ Two Wars,•.5 SI ZSam awawr. — ..I -_-._ _ ., .. ___ ___.. —. ___—. O w.hatw.law. _ _ ___a r._. k __ ... _____ .� Is r C /l•a..0., a• t ... .•••••ts. a• k II ITS .._. _ m_._. __.____.a ..—� R .nw Yea • w 0 r o w...a...Hat 14001100 'h. . S(Oinit1t Y-Sbl Vora N. - • = 0.. _-Sr*S' s w Eng la. 9c-4- ale_4-C t , 73 •.. Dom skit NO_.•. ale _ a .� A ._ . . suss.._ r _ Caw _ we.,. tw _• IL • S- C aa.d.al.t tad D t• • •11•01/0111 IT ary01•01•11 a• a ra _. .•+e oar tr • St 0 fi.eayt 2D' a .. N..er sod in*DM ... EaW aX11ao.a ,. F- of I wow aaa.,e . .len r.• . AS 0 s•• n •t O rq.4■• l ... a.•••r t Z We.d...sot ass d N ID n) PUMP: u.,,,tNy......._ B Two M. gi1 IS) ... WATER LEVELS: ..e .. . ..r KEY O sue WWI j 02-4 a lelew w d... oat Ott 211c92 U MOM,.••••w•.,•M _ . W tot"•"• *Mee MOAN_ Dec 16 1992 h..le•. Ott 21,992 0 le) WELL TEST: •..e..wa n...r•ai—art •' Wr•aw.o lea se•+ !NC Ile•.W..q.wo.+ WEu.CONSTRUCTOR CERTIFICATION: C INN .N,MF.A tw..w.rr _ ti ,a-• tle..wa tasty n.ai1.44.e/b•.•nand w.r.Nal l• el I'4Y -tIS e4 _t C. dle, Ss . rn.ld•wale Y Mohave..M wntrals,rNww Wa.le.tr YG YY,H r'h,M.., _f11r..A....ler M Yd M NbnMar"so•a+.M N•a mt ere•t05 *#414 R R 4001Yle SM Mw#IM•ta Pro nw.s st 1 salt tall"..sal ts. owl.•0 MOM•Idl NAME Mel William3 Cril)In9.trio,__ a. Ir. Well.WS I•. w.r•w Tito Walt td R.....•t^ v Ea..+a__.___ MOO•Pra 41 A•w•w rNM, •, m, Rd, CI L ot.dtr (Sgisap — .. /.�. . �t Uarra No NSA /- Mutt 3 is—•e 0' •awa.r* 2.3 t. ..• Nra •mate r._ slot w Cali•obh Rapla••on No WIMP'S))370.I N•.le.a.a ad t.• OM _DOC 111991 Tr•.wtwye.w. was•d.awaw•Wa.ww.T No I•it Dr._ Dec 2S t992 Figure 3-36-Hylen Well August 25,2011 Copyright 0 2011 SNR Company 67 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number 921094026 GO WATER WELL REPORT °r'IS' J STATE OP WASHINGTON ... w....r•3 rw.. .__ O w ..1 IT) OWNER:Prom 1rank.en JOtrww),__ 4114. 13310_33p/Oh•Norclund.WA. co L O GI LOCATION OF WELL orrr Attkrson _ NW u. _Ir Am __0_,:i 9 J.•_(f_wr CC CC py sTIUT mows of WELL 84...14 dr..1 _-14,1 Lin tb Lon•.NOmB,.1 WA 0 o �) PROPOSED USE: •0. •. a v.+ o wormy o (101 WELL LOO or ABANDONMENT PROCEDURE powwow/ 0 3.4114 )1• 0 11444 T..WWI 0 Oar 0 ......w 0444Wslr.‘44b..I.A 40.r.w,w r dw Fern./.•e14 Co'''''``•.•.dr wa.ww Mae eta.rr n ma*VV....•St.....rMe.nr r.•.w _ h NI roe OF WORK: ... 1 10IMM84. _-- .s AMNO.*a ❑ tam 1411 • 441141 Pq a arm. O 14Tarl ems.—.. TO 0 C 03444 n Cabo • 1144 0 en,tape a _ __-D 3, 0 •M.d..I o art o JdM o BT&Ott=Wed Pond.CPT 3 31 Q O IE) OINENSIOIR: pw,r.-r a" arm Gm loam dry sand - Ai o Ir. it ratit arm Oa- to IsI•.. 9S8' 8484 Ia...am.r.a.d ''i91 ra - ®M,, } q •rrI rlO•I novel W/H CONSTRUCTION 3- •CoB: _ C.7 £ car,•.Pre a' •Cow WA. 0' a r BO • COrro4bd well k .PR!A-C wtM fotC Ha O v w..a • S.. .•a..s.,—.9.5'.I r a. ea'7 1 tY a J C Um c Ill Wei Mor*I Lx ret•tctsd fa 33 M 1 nr•O*id Tr•a. n S' 'Wm Ma _01'71(7 ar %'IP a LU Zli Tw••.484.w C7 _p IMF dI.4.M _ r»— r _____ _ /mamma.^0.___a r__ n Cl) _.- _4_444_ 1.'IIa••"I1O' ••r a - Irma ... • .. 0 O 0 ..•. ... tayron }-- Two 50411Mf V4101— _ . .'a . —. A---__ y 'F 41 1 04•. T arm._.011 a.. 7 Ia. •r_01'7117' * �_ 084 —4. -. _a•. __.,a r _._a ,> 114 --. Wu _ _.—_a• _ a - -i G •.......... V. 0 M. • •Mrafr ILO 0w.0.1 .__—_. . •r _• L -- — , S mow...r. �.. • wr a ».r.rwo gyp' a 4444_.. .•w.......... Err MVa No.1 .__ _-_ I— or an v...r.....b.MOO 410 No• O Two d 44 •.•l.a14 __a Z Wd .a.Lra ...._.__? _-- h 8 PIMP: er....a..r.._ -_ _. 'O T.. - _--M.. >. I) WATER LEVELS: Log Rom anew rr•.F. 90' • r----- p sr.I.d 00' a rr.w++. o•r DSc 7 1002 . o A.rr..84144~4 i W 1yr14s mw. 84 14 I _�C t 1992 o4srr._ O.c 7IS!DT O• 11) WELL TEST: •oo...e......•..■lra•• W. W..14414•. ' v.13 4•a fa W.000 IIeL CONSTRUCTOR CERTIFICATION: C Goa a.a••.•Ir, _ .F....Mw M na14M14..r..n/..M.a44 s.....M lame NF 41dC fir. pi M...w_ a imaftra V ._al M.oan.a..w.rw....w......w e.ll.b.w... C TI.II 'r....,0. JI U..F..WA _- ma ea N..a...ammo a..o w Ina r.r W ra•.l*tMW L ••.•./.r(an..Y...e...N.w.r.••.r01 I 44.34 a..•..W. NAME Mel WtMWrn&LlaJ �.�r}C. s▪fl sag r...Man p.'....w.c.•.•.sa 046 w1..q Tap G. sa W.n rah Tam Wa4 MM T.• Nn MM 4/ _— —. - — .— Adams 23 I Mir orn Rd. ' . — .0 031844. _. SEyM•t ___uc•w No. 003$ I— NW 43,„_3_144,.a_ 0' _• a4r•r4__3 M..• s•w..a low. ._ ___ •4 • Caislal•RiMMa•Ns. MEl1Ma.O 1370.1 warm Is. M•• OM Des 71992 rww.w d.d•__ - W»•china mitts nob?v.o IN• OM• _ D•C71992 Figure 3.37•Johnson Well August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report 68 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 CIA .0 0 F'"a°"x'MF..I WATER WELL REPORT :_ OM Card 02042/_ FIN ...x x Ecel.et a'Ce>r- �• r STATE OF WASHINGTON .3 r- Wee.Aver Fawn NO [ .-- Q.. w..'C_ [7. l:`.3 ......PO.X00,4 4_�./Abiliacl[e�/.y o y (2) LOCATION OF WELL: Geary .-P J J't t4L1111 + �y .i_. ate .seeds_.[..T.�J1.R.Z.E.wY CC •211) STREET 1000RESS OF WELL tot'were*....«I j/Mi 4.E.& 4d -Ph...ea w. l Ff root 2'5A� m 0 O 13) PROPOSED USE: X 00,t n Kemal( 0 sowooal (10) WELL(.00 or ABANDONMENT PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION r- . IrrgetiOn 0 D.weta req NM L) Oua Fnxenas...Demme.by colon ala a.an a.mNN w Nrawn a r« 44 Neel of et eyWan.K.N.M W.aae N the IYIW■n«en•.w.x yre«.al E (4) TYPE OF WORK.°n"xn'..°Z wx.r / -..a Neel O«aN,ror.en owe**.nNt.elKe u7 i. t WrwYl rn0. TO C AbeMOMd l' 14••••••well K WINdd INS C Mtl 0 R.eeeell.on•d 11 MAW,.J JOINS Li A �:t '1L0 1111 .r 0 (5) DIMENSIONS: 1111..(«d..M !�_ y.—r�I,N. 1. a .e...t-� •H ''1 p 1 2 7. a R Dnnaa_L�rRN. Gogh of comDNl.d..a �9 .f LL J /` Fl ) - --�•�*42 wr. .a LC/ 19 3S- p C (E) COIIBTWCTION DEVILS: I ?j n— �• +ul er •afi 1 w cNwe aale.Raa: a. . Olw bay e n to 9y-s r J • g- • .21-5.�-- _ C nw�.Nwa..� ----• D1x.Mw.. ..N N L.1� /La It at°e.eJ }.t T__ - .r.5'- I rl 0 Terre L _ p' aam nx.. a x w. ew„/y cps -VA//la y / )6' { 6 Padersal ae 1NU w.K • _ _ G OTIa.NNY..IN moll-.r .-'---- 72 Eta Na.aww.• _ nb. r I] C _ PNNnn«.«ere— a re a - • -_ ..r”) i aaNtalen.Nw - a.w m 2 Na NNW a. t _ O q b.INgN• SilaMRK Y«pp MeU _ ,ra,acuFa ewe.. Sell i./4.4 .e I �._... p as L 71.. Slab s /.E:s y „ 9f'3•I worm. V f_ �_ Der.—.y�w...�d� P. - �-' Ol11- d.1 ow Mew....- a.a a. )•)(C 'U aaw.eaa.0 TN. ! Nars,..a Ka•a U ....0 Woe*,Imo N to n -- CO" Saxee.Neb rrL Ito To IOW)4eTp.ell 1 n .«el • 1- Male,.yawl ... OA,.IOW J!_C ---_ -.._ O O.•+.x1111 epnl.n NU.aOe.. HlT rMJ No -.—— .. n _ - __...__. _._. Z .peal«IM_— ..__00/041)44 M In N..a.t.e...e NON M 5) __ - _-_____1- T Ives _ �N.`. TI Fn a( WATER LEVE.aLq / •�M wen.«laN or a — O El.tilxal L_�j�.n I*.lap Del. .T / _ i I o Y+r...rr.__. o..-a..o.cn ire w Peer.*pm a rextml«by 'e'- wex~pp_rlr.19_ _ ,H Ca..N.W S•it).210—.'e- 0 IV WELL TESTS. Orewo.rn.ea.o.nl.nnl.,..•.a...ul.ev,.euneN.- a-' We.a e..^e Ho m«eT.w�_ N,L-. et«1...+.".n+ C WELL CONSTRUCTOR CERTIFICATION: r.ea -. . w, e.)444. ___n me.m...*bog n". till . ♦+ ' I dn.rocud ene:or a<cepl n.pon. IIII to conNUClon N M.-1111 E - end 41 conpl•nce with •■ Witalvoolon C«Nr.elron etlet Wl •Nla.Nd and Me nblreel,oe tSp01eO l 00.0 nee NW l.my WO ..... .-. keowiede.end D.l ■ CI weee..ry«N tweewt..,ea aro*.pone(.reed ab11.Me0-.a0«0601110 C. .ren«n tap 14•Ia 44.e11 41 *meet... wn.I.n w Yn.r e... — HAW .STe:CALn_- . Y 2'444 a M .E 11P1 Mal CPw0a.14. 7 I WI Otteel ION _it N••w.met �a (Slenee) s- -L.1Mw.NO 0 9S"f .....4 a domes=Niter r.FLL pale w Conooctor. 11) .Io /).1 /Q •.Nx.— .NI tar a.A NN eel el._. . -a.e. ANN igvi 11iP'S-.G 11.-ziyil0a(. -cI`t/ ! z M..v«nw •.e.u. O.N_-- _ N11//LL}}LLLL�f// .19_ r.p.relwea rem __Wee ea.or ..5*d.7 Yowl. wA (U51 ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY) •Cann.m r,II.n nw +1116. Figure 3-38-Justis Well August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 69 Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance'eport Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number. 921094026 a ale rt.rlrui.fnasI.tt.l..W,. WATER R'EUa REPORT O ward C,pe-Jtaw�•at-,. ' '"""°° :'.. O Third tons Nnt . t'.eq ATAR OP WAg@6tON Yermd Nr —. .___._ (1) OWNER: N.rn. f O �.?v, of iYst.ty Address �jf','yQ ON 1!//V W as (2) LOCATION OF WELL: a atrrd> r�-Cf f. Y4.• .. iE ,Nei y T1`/ N.A.) E%v.n. Ca a' Stae.ra and ninkvov front serf on .n.W...:uuun,yrm r _--__-_....... . tr 4) (3) PROPOSED USE Iwn.e.ur a'x onsusin:.l i I uum.ruai US) WELL. LOG: "1 r-I !rnention (1 Teat'Wet. fl Other r] ponpatbn-D..r,be by r.a....rn ,tr..s,:. ,.. ',.nrr-wt one rlrnelvee.rod O thaw thaekce rt at Onuorta 51,•1 the t era f rtv r M the n.r Itf,n ern (4) TYrI. OF WORK: •-•«e, .m,.er nI wll Nr0[km Mwrlmf f u Ch at IM t n e vA 1 n n;rh endow.of ro.wlat+aa, .i none dlM vuew MATERIAL. rAO__ TO = Now waif P Mersa, UMt ❑ tbrod 1'. —• -- 'y N lAmfomea 1 Coble • Drive,CI Ss,/`t:Gdrorv.n,.4 -', l 14 G £ AI.Vndllblted r Amory C fm.d O S e1�j-_ ... 4Z1-"I..-__. - C-_..d Z C (5) DIMENSIONS: —�(,[, + - aj _ mitts �.ec O inuer'ler of seep `. .....e ,/y�._,,Gi,..4.6--.._..) ./vo7 , I .1.A _,•0 Q C Druid 0 O 0 Otpm rMmVlernl wwl g0".".."ft �'—'p�e//j�j�04 y .. TO+ (6) CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: --�+�'w'h•�� ,4# 1� >- E Casing installed: ,4" .- Dam. awn rf/ rt.to LP Is r 14..) , co b. Threaded r; ' own rrom ft to ._._. n, •' !w . s' I` . O rO Welded ll ..DNtn.INm n.tO .. .. n ! �j4.D 4f-A. i Perforations: _�_ cD e) TyM at ImlO.ww ta<d •• C I r.-._ W r .. ... �. SIZE of pedoratttlhe en by ...m. ! � rl 0 yertpraLons from 11 IO ft -. .perforatlana from It to ft -- .. -_- TS ... DtttSraaeaa Iron N to .�ft. N f¢ -- . -._._�.._.-_.. . .. .-. • '.Screens: Yea a NO n r J r Mmutsriurers Name S/)1/ .._ _ - _.. _.. R tops_ STAea,•IL.e SS Modal No J --• . _. — — ._. 0 DIMS .r 51w 11.10 14 Dons "Al ft to tlI ft. .. .- •- (:# tV clam. Sint ore tom 1t tO .ft. >. Gravel packed: Yee 17 so(r hat Of Croon' .. _. ar Gravel planed Isom ft In a. I' fti Surface seal: y.a p N.ci Tv whet my,nr /� ft .- _.—_ ,_ y p Malmo'used In 5051 0.14, 1 pv It To 1d.Ti . ,— -. Did any strata rnnmrn unusable water/ Yes LI No9 i ._ /w• type of wale./ twpth of strata .. . _.. -___.. . 0 Method of'f alrng strata«n Z !7) PUMP: Manor.rmrve's Name .._ .. . 4.1) Tree 11P. - ._. i ._..._. O IS) WATER LEVELS: ""4"4"“„s"."".•. rl..at,an , --c h � / a level 6 7•. +calm l...el j I ft below top of writ U:ru Aa41-/ r_. ' O Anal,an rrr.ttiIt 11w.per,mare roan Moe —_. .. --_ __._ Artesian rater u aomronw py , O Woo.vain, tic r _ _ W Draw/awn.,(I) WELL TESTS: Dran.,,.moment rata,0.101 it yya/ bwerlrl ldNdr MA ',evw Work Marten (.2LM/ .I/// t'ounpl.e... Weed. I0.t f n� Wa.a pump lest,10.S' Yen r, itu% If ft, Sy Sennm" - O s..le. g51/awn spin ss tlraaonen ofte. the WELL DRILL .R'S STATEMENT: tY — —_ ._ This well dws tinned (Inner my lur:ad,rlldn and ih',' rtlh.r: et a, .. • •. true to the bett of my knowledge :ad iw9.1 Os o... data ■time taken as Yro 10000 pump Wrtd01 Olt JWnt•r bvN r N. ,...•.nuad Irons well top to Mater Ietell A• a r.... water Lrvn Tont Mole 5.I.rr ! T,n,e Wage, Leurl NAME s Y 0 l .. ._ _._ Address u, rte 4L++I.. •, pt.rr prwtl or CP Q FDate of te•t .... ISlgnedl tel:. hatter env az, gat sown on. a n,Aeavenwein alter aa hoer r W tiller. Artesian now . 0.pm. Dolt ,Aa 6 ♦. i ..r '.. Temperature or voter of~al..W a rbem,cal vnalfals male,TM C Nn M t.ieassse N,.41,-,11-s-- Lunt e . IV,/ Mgt ADDITIONAL SNPZTS if NECEASAIlYI S L NO.73$$_4 15 ■Nee,4-111 ..4 . • Figure 3.39-Kelly Well 9 Y August 25,2011 Copyright 02011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 70 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number. 921094026 0 no°wee"'"""°°" WATER Wei.L REPORT '"" �^Obf61 y� r- no Ors or(WWI &weAd Doe•-D""Geer STATE OF WAS)UNO TON CO) n••cow-P..'.coo. W.I.RpN Penne Ile ` �e[� y��/ [, t /�J�y G (1) OWNER: Neme7QlS..l11c/TQl.se•- ___ Aebee.4-17D rtoodlL 1'AZ6 (7Lia!(Jck.._-- ,,I Cry/ ! Q /C. ' rn d' IZ) LOCATION OF WELL: ra.xT�r�Qr SOyK,/� -3i1Mart]l.L-1.1- ��-y�-3Jt« t !1 A wee s 1x.1 STREET ADOORESS OF WELL in won...em.•.) &OEM' •24., s/axa ZS cA.c —_-_. O al +� `' r ? (3) PROPOSED USE: V Dpn.. lnd.gl.1 14•9CODI❑ (101 WELL LOO et ARAMDONNENT PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION 0 C Irtw.teen VI f: D.Wr.r T••t W0 - Olga' ❑ Petal.& D..c.w.nn saw cw.et...i..a a...,.,and•Tt.Ctr•.nee I.ew 0 1111011•01 a eQIMW sae IN W W Wee a IM..aaa saw.wows.p.•'tw•r ad 14) TYPE OF WORK:D,.•.l"."b.'a..N wee glee.ww.•tr"w..sG awe.a Ww..rIt. �. c Ix warring _-...---_. wn■r x0011 40 p Abandoned I Warren 110s1hiod Gag � Swt R T�M �IIt O.p.IW I, CoNs 01140 ❑ .'r P.copdionnd I Rgrs:i AIMS U / 'v _��� f - a @) DIMENSIONS D.Ing.of.•N ---4----- . Z 1C O MAW .'MN Oplhac SElOtad*eV //rf—_R. tt wL .C.ALy . •w (S) CONSTRUCTION TAILS: = C crrlON.l.« Pr.«w-AV.._..n 1,10J n _1117711 - • F• _ < n• melee. • DNA n in s L+rwure - • r v ar TNr.•e • DNO.M_._ II to. _..._II .'l Qn1 51 ` Nye = O hrtorNblr: Teel • L0 N.eta4l..ww_jai _ G7E-smi rd.,/et _ . !3-- t 7 a •wnotawnIre.—1,20—*r a —5k 54x4 _ /D //� m ea __ . C.to n . _ .. 0 _. n r .D -'.... rt- T _ Scream Irerr--CD -• Trim — < �i P.s ba ow_. _It.n a so_ ....re _ Des .1W C s Y•_.--•..n .. nee_. It 1I wa.r WINS Soap .eel 'S..c'.r.v. 7R a .a Paced No. _ n ro �F- b. _ } -- /Krpe Yee, Y..[•« Tows.,—7 Iy. R. Q Wl.el...d.... -. z OS w.•In■•CWH n...same u1M v..ID No l� ' — - - U) Two is awn, O.p*.1 we .. .. -T 0 1MIM el r•.e Iem.aft _— .. (T) PUIIW'. man..M..4 New_ .- ~ al TtTM RP 4 0 (d) WATER LEVE /y�eewe MINN BOO e...- V Stets N•.1 17Yf+ II.Wow tap Need OW 1 Lf An...,resew*.__ ne not.rare NW Oar tH swoon* to IDee.nn.awes Met•M•rtedA)Crre- - (9) WELL TESTS: P.•IN.alrA.eret woe R...'•11biwe Nic IIee1 D) n•••..ma re.node Tee « 'pee.Mtow', — WELL CONSTRUCTOR CERTIFICATION: E pal:me weN— R/ae1••ntM ~ I contlruc'.d ad:at accost r.podSDINIT for cOrUushos in Mr well iii v ••- and its coltp•.aCt ding N Washington .al homineclirl r..1dYr• -- --- IMI.n.4 Wad sod Ow,Nottasson reported slor..n tlr to my bow CL .n 011 •ew ewe.ell leer•!.lee.4....011 L I.d0.and DOW • 0 w t..�l..-y t 1 N NAYF _ _. _. M . raw&d.. te! R. Da Nom) -C _ Addre• ....•` a_) Minn r•.-lf-.1•2_W wan..wll-JO--•.4..11..•abet—1.....-10, Corw.cton'. km.,_...._„w1 n.n•N.RM •.. IL I. r. Arw4w eN_- _—A... CMG_ ZIP M11 OLM �. T1.e4el.ngWOW Mae•enowic.•rnwm.wr veer- MOD (USE ADDITIONAL SHFF?S P NECESSARY) .. woPS PPAf C brC041. Figure 3-40•Michelson Well August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company , 71 ( Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 0 earl r�.e N. I eat*7.5 o '" WATER WELL REPORT UNICAK%WLLLO.s A BA S76 O i CC, p . STATF OF WASHINGTON r W ti wan Persr w. CD a (1) OWNER: w. KFY.ii A1ihL5 A ._/1/ D all E,c_Rd.,...S1LAtirdiza ,rp-Lse _ O CC m LOaTIONOF WELL: cm.4 JEFF t'-aQSt1 Al „SE ,..A--a__- ,.��r b e I E wu Dc . G T rdu STREErADDRESSOF WELL in am*anew !9/ .dtf4,ley RA, N aad/AUd r LA.1A To ✓ � (3) PROPOSED USE A Oo.sRe'a bmwVi r tA..crool :- (1Dy WELL LOG a ABANOOIWENT PROCEOWE DESORPTION --- = y Dee.naa /aal W.1 L Cone 3 ram Ea.r.001104010,00,0 bobby.S ..•,.,nortama.,nn.tic.aro o*P or*n W o.W W oar*al,M maw*,M Wf MAMA'G•+waa..*re r We.N.nA b*on my TYPE OF WORK S/ c1..y.el ew.WWO.. O a=.. .Ir,a..pearfll - _ ... Y•flel _-. Fw1r TO C aer.ar.e NSW/WMI ig Wined o1B Hama —r�P �+_ a--• . as Raconammed_, Roma 7 ,.nw,: &Cail"�O Law_61_11[11N Opy SA1 d--- — S- L (St DaaENINONS: otaa.a aar --- 6 WKtis. . iMp --- QLAy_._ S _ .2/ - R Doted /t<7 N.0 Nob*cr,•ww*al /37 a PAW!E.0 troll y.,.Beriude.d__ }otri - E wad GRAV,/ £vtrh. . CO (6) CONSTRUCTION DETAILS a. .� i- ? /Jed /,S e. 131 N Gr.,D, !soma sof • .37211 _ : L- C woad 1115...._/767•* / ti- rt CIA La/4?, d v, ,C. . ro:»O.rbZ $--' pn sr k Cdr, y9' 7s co ID n,Mn.d S'.__' oar.Ono_/.1Ld !.*, l.)'.7..3 rt 1-• y 1E. W T n a eV 411E. -_�r!L Z i �, hrlawesna. w.E w l$ 'IMO r9a4,r ANd Alan As O Typo aprei.m,*ma _. ST Cairo/ A TRACE C S■tA a w•koai ,.s _ •Be _.._w /3 F ajar A Alt ar A .• A _ crvaw++•noW II 1. —�. /kt toA /.i?. _ — na-- —e 3 S)aNC Iv (t18. Sc4es b. J or,laabov esm -. ao ..—e_ �-y _ . — &M M. b1 y, NO CD — W WnA.r.ess I.aree lOtt.SC& y r ,,p.5i YPia Write- (ja _ d e) , - D..,. .t so re. r t V ram-/j/.S it ro/54.13- a --- _ Uan !Mean FaN Pro A . -_ _- C -- ,10� El OmntpKYM: Yw In yy Sprlll••, aat,... di h. 1_ _ z —_.-� sunsae bnL tee I$ No� B W eaaF•t_AIL _rt —_ _• Z C..0 rya 051:O^un utiwn4 ei.a�, 'It 0 Nap _ f n%I i L- Iro m oan Oapr d.ba _ . in rrt _ s 0 'O (T) PURR: 1W.a.cooraNano ___ Aw a fro. -- — id,_ p- O• (D) WATER LEVELS: w�iw n w w Ww.- own San* /+ (e- 9 1 1, co." 5 2. -_ ,,,r,5-- O bur.a.+: •wb,^-0'I..• I5.-Y/-yS"- WELL CONSTRUCTOR CERTIFICATION: W w.w a..,. _ M s sea..01 Jo. ___ amen. ..5 e 0 0, . __ I nObbu0NC and or btabo1 r.tpanst an}Pot COeVUC1.M 01 T+.w. M,C I. O '— ,fie atw.we Soaosarce a1,ax Watrn 0n.eI cO••erucro,standees Wm°am uua;end s+ (D) WELL TESTS: DrsWm.n s woo,.,1 red.Wool s brad nab.M b bee me""b'^1ve,.epomK*moo am vW.b m my bssl.aO.aadpl and Baal C Visa aw.as se noble nail Ns❑ b SM.aw+anl_ SroiCA N tom.F11(Lr�J•• �. 01st APO. _-_--__eol.an va. _--_.—R.owes.,OW _._.m NAME iiaaII�+is I.OeMap+ rnM 1W POP (A Sc @U." l.. __ - __ _ *Mon, 4TN Pbee*•r II{fs�j��'.L+taxlc LvA• _ y tios.ay MIA I..WM%n two Si porounSd.n(err*eel,5105 Rao Mt !sw11e� """�" IMe..I alit i• arw Y7�. O ep V IM*his) Fs 11t051 5 rote waif LOW Toro *AM two* �,,,�M�b 2 __ — _ "�'0"a' orc De i3 y N& a.._.(z=__2:_• ___,to IS _.......----11_11 - -- -- (USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY! orb.Nol no a Boo*toot la.3wt: n n .<'7 rtaraattboot OW__&1_,n — 1.005 tW ,r.0101 ar,.1011 VI yn b_�. n Ecology la an F1212 al Opportunity aCs co W Minn/awe Adbn employee For ape .mesa MP. so m. Dan . -- Gal 407-6600.accommodation needs.contact the Wawa RaoUrccs Prograe,al 1206) ranorrne n WNW_Wed•.tnrla10 ebbe%roe*, M t� M �7'6GW.The iDD n�mMv Is(2061 4076006 ./� EC,O00,A iW1,.•• --4.-- 0 Figure 3-41 -Miller Well August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company it Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report ( 72 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 - CIJ 0 fn.diem and rl,w c:e...n ar.n c.•d be infi3 1S o«rt.*or Erd,,, WATER WELL REPORT — — bk..e cap,-l...Cap, UNIOUE WELL I.D.I_ r Thd Copy c•..,•cap. STATE OF WASHINGTON roam P.Inn be _- y — }; (1) OWNER: Ng... . 'W Z0 ldl/A/ jww/ A.We«/72 obLPE(Ay 0 o N (2) LOCATION OF WELL: caw., 0.4 .•�� ...PAL .S.c._L T. �l.n wr. m i) (a.) STREET AOOeAESS OF WELL la mamas•done)/7o_�[QR// zt- w/♦ YJ 1b _ — 0 (3) PROPOSED USE X D°^•ar IndowNal hl.rdcpel ' (10) WELL LOG or ABANDONMENT PROCEDURE DEBCRIPTIDN I- To. - O•p.hoa 0 O.W.!.r TIM W.4 - O!Ilp ■ Ramat elf abblern•h_der rnW¢Iw v.d wy lS .. .IIn!..•owl Maw ' b.C4.N of now @Wr roe rna Lena••O A•rDa of lc mM✓W Y,..r11.b4YT PMM/.I.a, N (9) TYPE OF WORK:D.+r'11 n.-ewdrRl wwa N•RV,,..nl^r Lae aeenrm.a.�I wl«,M1an _ •E. bl war•thaw OW — _. _ ._ Yl{nIM AN Mend= blab.well IN LNIMC. Dba rJ Bond j �/ _ { rear ) p. - < C D•pened Celle $ Comm C Aa.r�aLM2 T9./3a( _ �-Q ...„..6_f__° - O Recond.Daeed I Rotary_I Jelt.d -i ..B�W,V ♦D) j-4'edverre.S.//L - �_if 1 C (5) DIMENSIONS: D•aweler of go 4�r _ .loll.. �* 'A/ro ay ..0y rt Qatve.. ---__.2 a 'i Dr.led 7 7'_l.. Depth of completed NW -77 _n. o'n'11'✓1J.�ewQy Ge y - _...�i _ 2 EE fe) CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: Y 1 - ° }� I.I. Casio Installed. J2e _• mom ewe •%/ A s..-l�_mi h, /e�ri V.+I�{��� ---I •• _92 + _. _... • Dan hart— _Roe-- _a •JR...¢w4�J.e.T..'."_..roI'NO cow _ _=_fie SS < C Lola"Ream noon/1W ` _• aRn.tw_ Rs 1_1_6424d-et) QL4Yr1 SO/I12..- SW- -.-. °d O .0 Perturadpw. 1441--) tae ` Trp,d p.drb.ror..ed i_— -- 41/' �yl�� �/l I L O Q WC a♦a.•IO♦at,ww R.all --.-�_M. /,•/ F1d�JJEY.1t' !V .� I� 7U O YYYII/I09/ Savoy Q • 7/..-.- //- y__ �n.� .2/ 75 a.bracer•ham_. -.a N... n. /eg y -A!/rsaRS.ifr.rQV e6fts. f Tn Y m ea .fir - -.wbra.41«roe heel _la_ a•.EJ j 7 O — — �6 7 es Screw: ,«�boL 1r' r a Wrw.alwR'•Wm.L/cgepgya'f � – C) .0 .m_-1'.. Sl OkAEQ � " ee_ — .t. t )h 0,1141 Caw eele ._eeh R n S. - j _ .. — !1 C Oa..IP Ok.d: Yw_ 1 ID Elsel/w,d.--- - .._.-. - _- - Gra.e Wooed hwn_.-._. R se —la I 54lHat.'MIL , 4 Non T..h.I•.Ptkt .___..R. _.. WN,NI mod t«w . /ATaNE O Dann.so « .M Coale. maw? Yo•Ll N.g.. z Not.et omen -.. PMlho Mrat._ N Whoa of.M,u+a Rra.01_, _ -... ._.... ..._ e) (7) PUMP: _-.- - - -- - (e) WATER LIMA ta.d«w.c•R..awe r 0 811111 level 3--N.•a.♦lop OI.« Data L-9 _ _ 0 byfe**0 Webby,* _ MG NM Moen Inch Data ___ — — 1.) /Ma.lan..la,II cebrdlbe Or __ _— _.-.-._. Y- (e) WELL TESTS: w.regy♦4 owl helar Wlyr pwyyya.lylp Noel wory alrt.edil/�L(pt .,w CO w;Neel-MO( - le O w«•aw.p uReaea+v« Is ONe br.•°"7------ N S/ •"♦ WELL CONSTRUCTOR CERTIFICAT'IO)1: C roe wl,Rl.law_.._. N.Irard, MN ire d) - - - -'- - I opMU•cted and,m accept r.eopn.pbtf lop Cen.tlUUiOn d Ha.hell. E - ----- and de Cpmph.aCt rah all Wa.h.talon waa Can RraCt et.M f LNleflah used and the Intocm.brn reloaded epdbe Ma few le my beet 4- Pao e.rrop0t l«R,.•Iwo~Mee I.bl...11 feeler Y•R meraIM knowledge and being CO bW,wall hop la wetet erboll a 1M .1.•.1... boo *.t..t l.r• map Uwe NAME /[Bel 4../...,_.c., Q p»e.n•FAO M corny.. '" m�e 12.1�r41e.1 I- OW mum— ' 90.NM�--W rna%.lea _A.rrdew an.t e hot tspn.d) _ a`nil __Loeser.No 107 Gonh.Gtar's Wu.toter! N11s1 ...=___pp tr.ell maw ma ea It ti ore ,..jy.irpn adade...e_ a.. Dal. .. _ NpJ11D :tame_ o.t.T!f� _ .ISQ� r.l..wrwe.f 5 Mum a...cm.c n.t..wt 1421 Mir $11EETS F NECESSARY)ci.;i' S CV..• yS PP/)r (USE Aj)61TIONAI Ecb as,w ta:m dale IRI :. a Figure 3.42-Morrell -Robinson Well August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 73 Wetland Identi cation and Delineation and earn'econnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 CO o F,.Odom... :E•.N Cop,with WATER WELL REPORT 'r""""° �4 y"'/ J DpnMe a Ewlepr ""n°Caw/-J...ra ropy O m.e Cc STATE OF WASNINOTOIt- a-Dolor•Coon W.I.Apo.bow Ho. W co 0 (1) OWNER: N... �IDD iftir C' PTVI jcji ww.+...1-0 2b/s.=-ild_bd`ladl A�'?., G a aI ri �y�. err (7) LOCATION OF WELL: CO..a ..1... i. �[�SC�o��w, .._.•-._.V.......-'4-5240..z.r. .. rpZ.� w H/fi.vu c = (7.1 STREET ADM:MESS OF WELL la n.a•.raw) 73b kerb 4IV Jed- 4) >.• (3) PROPOSED USE: 21I,hoI1d NOWAY U Munkp•I U (101 LOG w ABANDONMENT tM10C®U!DESCRIPTION T. U) i D.WNM TAN WM 0 Wow ❑ F.r.a.N O NIM.b 46■1,O.NNN..1•1 M M•I.•I M Woo ur.. .,snow rN•....e N erY1.1.W No Now.11.NW*W IN aSM ISO*Oft..o.•...r. (4) TYPE OF WORK:17.wa.•asew) .an woo weolor+Niboob Maw 4/6 ..r1... Q (II•m,nM.••I wrNMI I Now vs z gAbandoned U Now w• -A.LL•IkDt DMT C Mw C O D.00.nw Celia IU Orrn•R C BIQar.uAt 7-0• Se[L O 3 Q C R.00 dlllolNd RNNT .wow C r _ -. • S DIMENSIONS: Dwm.I.r oral 4, ...elms ..e...Allis / `� ,� E Drli.d tat Data oreorKM.d...an . n. -F'2�• .It K C0 ` i.' r a'_Bl IS le- 0 ro) CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: - - y!1 . • C.Nn•M•lMA& OW..r•• '�pp w M �_ M �,. �I C.. -, ai+ ' t) ZJ_ J a•W- S • DM.Na._IC3 wJ-.4`a i _7 7 LLI £ n:..d.. r" r-1 • Mum mer._.._.I. .. c,2�y. 5,,rlydY { 5' t PerforatiNN: Yrp w ■ • 4 _ CD O Type M 6abr•Ier owl .- . ... • _.K • h MI - oala.bno Om. n N_ A. IM -- . J IQ ..WrrWn•from n to_ M. ' c MIMI/ - . IIA. woman*awn ___.__ A N .. IL ii, O 0 iNMEss Y M _ WTI - -5,- •. ir.149_1.__0_6-Sawc N r N..A.■..r.M•M. QA1. - • ice_ ( LeY- .. 1,.. 4 �•� ay > DN1a AN.r.1�1le 1 3/_I. /J 4 R. Il _ //"//lt _______ �, ' ' C DM. NNNM ."I• e ! a. id ••:ftil .7T••!.l. a III OrwM.NMrMW r..0 w Nero* L y - ...� • . •_ I A O.•w.Y.e.A.. M r j �M, FY ."47 r%� P n._._ 4401•4411Mbk Yea O Wl•ri.l rr•w w.w. .jj.�4 l-�N�� z Or M er.r.[CM.r u,YMN..•l IC' - -._.--_ vrt; w� ----. ______r_0 Ty.•M...n Odom M.r.W _` C) WMNM•aMV a.a•Mr _ -• -_____.._ • 47) PUMP: -.- CA WATER LE I•nS-. 110.MwMw. 0 (a) wow ow.r.Iwo M - O S..b..,.l 61.£n hobo.fob OI.n..D.N..1.--17-2L, - t • ly N1.••,or...W__ _!•.o.pros WA DM. M••w...S C6MOYdb, -_6aR �u..MR b- �y� O (9) WELL TESTS: D•••m:•. ever W.Mr lw.rI MM Men MN wow avow b_� N G•WM = '.'� C or..•c,.n,an rr6.T Vr..- w dyr.b.kvan WELL CONSTRUCTOR CERTIFICATION: E - r,.e .. pal won..n __n.* db- I w I cdn.o•cled awl,re.a•ol f.pIM■bdily P.O cMYrucbdn of IHI..e11 •.1 Is comp1wn6. wrM all poem ra ldn .NI Construction w.ndbde L - •• M.wH.b used an In•rgdTlp.M r•punsd.boys noy true t0 my MN A _ k•owsdgO•rd bone 0- Aay.rev opI l..r•1•.r••••e 1~l..0 b44011 OM Never NMI 4048/44/4 hY.*lop to ever l..40 /�� Q7 ....r t...4 T... w•w.aw nor .•wtw NAME e. (/�J Q IMN�LN,[IM OI•TM 1 A�II�, I/,r1JG �/�• M MDT ovoO L -. .... - - ____ __-_-- Andreae .at i"Z. --frA r'1'./V/CC(,j' /' L . .. H O.I...r.. _ - .�... �����1,,j�( fS L'///YC��•. S//Boer-'•— /� // (dame) N �LIC.M.NO .••a May d0. pot rN11.M n O... one._L M MR.fAl. I Art.. .111IN•van soon•..1 k N• .ctof* - Anwn.a. __ __ _-O.A.w• D.C. W 4yX,LL /7- AL. D.I. b N I t•wern.•M rate, Wye.Cba.E.IerWyaI•wM,rr❑ wiX (USE AODITIONAL SHEETS F NIECESSAPY) 'Cr NO-M 1n'.1 rya 411111b1 Figure 3-43-Oestreich Well August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 74 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 `"'°A"""°Caw r"° '" WATER WELL REPORT Sion gs 730 0 OeOanagwe el Frpbyr � &scowl GOOF-Chow'Cap* STATE OF WASHINGTON U 1A 0 4.8 A 52...S.- r- Tnld COOL. 0/00'.[Apy weew/nfTlyw«,W y S (1) OWr€R, Yw.�ataO! S�arL&A/ft . - ____- .dae.•.?70 015-101 eel Naa ,1444 l{ia5�•3s7 (s) LOCATION OF WELL cos+. a freiesd2 —. si .SE s F.t 9 _ ,A9),.Y/a... 0 Cle D Or molt Act. rn ILO STREET APDDRFSS a WELL to wrsr weal.!.)__�' 7 —-.._• p B) (3) PROPOSED USE: • O01ee6M 15,11■,11!, i Mw.,cspal (WE WELL LOG of ABANDONMENT PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION 1- 1T9FAde new.IM Teat W•11 OMer een.anm G.caY.a,coke. CN4<IM nee S 044«rl awl.l•cly. Intl..u. Q N INC\n..f S•*It.r.aro nw 115,4 on.,ISIS.*°I II.w..,n n.¢f,aulen p.nunua. F (O TYPE OF WORN:D.a.'a WNW,d«.u.__.____. . ien_i l..aw..,•,,••..."•5,•.u. ,, ,eu...,, - 0 I.anr•Mat•O l - _ unlA.. Fllw TO .bandowed her well 4ernod Dry Bored , C Cle.pened CabY• 7.- Owen $LtDwd 7�/.4 [ri/aa6(rfs _ C a8r O RwM.d,IWAed Rater.• Jetted /LO*.( . 4'4y GV/7* M1Ro ..4Q G — ' YIUu / Y``,419 d .SOP - A /3'3- n o (67 DIMENSIONS Diameter or well �[�T----- "+u`fa. �` Q ,C y(4.�Ta-Af7� �,4 Ayt-A-r /ASx. z R r.ra ed /�/ r.el DwhMrospleled.ell �� n `(J//?..5-6/Aa IO/AT62 - Jee/okff• ',1/77 C E (67 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: 60-Ay V("Ay F,Nc� S/NJd /77 w Cnmg.,.(a,I.d: - Y_Vile Ow.I,. -.134 11,0.14-.7:.3710,./ /..r 181•C w.a.a r _Vil«dw..Yoe /gyp A to ./r�R. W Li '1:7,,' w nf,wNn •- •... W .— I■ 4921.C-1 7•[!Own.bow.__ Ara / _ .A. .—'_ -. T YP.rto..IIOM: Vol I .4K O O s 0 6 !nr s• 4n dw .w. 11 _ - _.-. pna4M0 Mew .__-. 1104 h 0 R) _._.---...pMwal.p x04 _.—Y to _ e I..- „II - RI peoorano,AOM _._1.w_ n -_. - 1 O IV • S,..n. 1.g--14-o._ W Maa.ba.rw•■Noe. . __.- -- 0 Trp. .5L re o pv(/- Made Na _ I 0 60404_ '�. sloe.r. '020 Ire /�/ n la. f Y6.--A rNew y_. slot!�su7e_t.QLD.wrow �..° e w___/e/..n. - WW.W.I P.c1ad', v•4 Ya'71 Sue.,I P..e, /O-2-0_12.9_ 1 1- be..•Owed Awn....._- n to. .- "--r- _. ._—___ ._ Sunoco 'r{y,J G .1 1TJ� parr....».1: .e.�ff IM I ,o i..aw4nl -.41L-11. ___ ./v51"`Y ira Urd l Y.1s1a r. - __ 0 p,dwwaf.a.w..al Mgr./ ,N/7E ----- UJ .L_ Nun•1!14 eel O oA• w.uwnra.n.nw.bla."e/+Yp� An /�a�/ o Z rrvn ar."..t DwYt Of..rs. I 16^ /3 (A 4.rr,(4M..aW Mr...CO--. _ _.- 8 in PUMP: cwna.<"■•as.e. • --- 1, (8) WATER LE LS' I.Lag ear40..Iw..l.0. /� aea.•r. na 4.a1 _6 aaj ....._._.. - OSIMK IAIM aZ o Min.rep Awed, D.M._ `.V6 +[(IY .. ... - U ewwwe 4.sww. e.pr tau...-Al DM. W &,t.hM.•Irw..nnl,pNJpv .._Y.Mr Irk II IF *DIY 4011•14114-G• p^ 7-3 IY Cowei*4O OP-4, - '693 o (9) WELL TESTS: L .oOpwa. pw..a,f.o.end Imam 4 %not .+ wt.,b..ny rev.•df•Vol . Mots III.lot..e.n_____._..._.. ..• WELL CONSTRUCTOR CERTIFICATION: • ,sa a.. w1.IoM _. N a•.aw,aYM IK• I co effected and-el ercepl rspansA4dy to con4A,CAen e1• n w.4. yG -_., sad Its rnmpWnCe WAA 4I Weewollun web corevucbon et.nd.■ds -. 04!10,111**CO N0 4,4 IMlTMannn.pMIM*MM..r4 Aw IV 5,Y best Mf 4.cowwroor.1191.W4na.Ma*.n pyq Lowell 411) .IPIM nama04I, (11 knewI0000 SAC 6.11.1 YZL ,Y wII IOO nl N1M Wm.) �'' ((/��� nne «Y.—. N W,M wY NAPE �'.•1.IIL�r 1. 1 V/I LL1� .IVY I V /I(W,*SiiO.Sat 1101.0 O Yanle..AlNAIl / �..�.,vae O --- Ad1YK PO•BOy/L 47F"'0cti;rLa11r4F- ~ Oare a,vw. -- Ne�7 (Son m."4+41 / w, ,n.,«IA SS It 0..pewLnM.A .. - I. LOA COn,raclar Y tom,. Mon uoi 13..a14«..M« akr ns R¢go�lrTm�lio�n ``�� Qa� /��- .1P J'� .mwnnw OP. Dale _ _ P.O T/7♦ Y1`-t-l1-ryt Cale o I - Terw.ay....wage, woo•ce.n,C.1a.i4vn$„wee/Vas Mal nLVr JJ 4) (US( nnrt1lKN+ina Stiff 1'. / Ni(:a SSARV7 , .In .. ..n •BY- I !'A/Coati:1E 7S-110P07' Figure 3.44-Snelgrove Well August25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 75 Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance'eport Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number: 921094026 } Sun Care tie W34632 cm WATER WELL REPORT J STATE OF WASHINGTON O p..N'7r twat.to NJ L. 11) OWNER M.-. L1 cLael.Stevens *'• • 5'1 L Ma-rows:ole Rd.Nordand,Wa S9358 p y 17) LOCATION OF WELL.=401.4 .e•rnon .. _ __ _ NE ^^ SW '• ;.a 9 - 29N • 1E W Y 2 C' Rat STREET ADDRESS OF WELL la,42•2.∎mows, 51'E.Marrowslone Rd.Rutland.WA.98358 C3 y? IN•m: I ow ? (3) PROPOSED USE: ',Metre ,^411 1101 WELL LOG of ABANDONMENT PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION M.ht•N 111N Mt FiYl•■Clowba try cats t1.Ya.N,Sn N asliv.al YE la.M.na+ha Inc wf.a.PIN•F = In WOO WOea0 mum•1as IIWYW FlC.M,Ifaur gnl aNn aM 0MY aM YVY a,sal,star go (4) TYPE OF WORK:owner..NRlu&M a•bo.Mn OM 1 .mall•.. yI.Y..V.\. Y•Tpe p.p Mae -.. .IaIN•tl MOO TO 1 O 14n.,,,+..1 utS ,O..m- sass. C I I....sw w 4Nn 'Now Bm Ern day. 0 111 C I.IAM.a4C 11 CC C L19M.DM gravely day , 0 (5) DIMENSIONS, dr-mb a.n P Ix•r &n free Band.6$iL pacned.dry 22 4 r+ „1.+ 187 T' real o w 044* e° 164'-7" Na am fret sand.(dose d v 45 5 R Bmgavely oar 53 6 E Mt CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: Ern base sand,dry B7 1 O Gawp awa•.t 6- main F- - g . 1. 155.11- l 1176 11. C ys,�, Em paned sand 8 day O 5- arl. Fee+ 154'•5' . 1. i54-4'.- a em rouse nand.dry 117 14. J — in..xa 5- er {.... 186-6" ^ To 184-7° • _Ern t It W41VEl 47 14 0 .0 r..n.wowr .Yes b (48 152 lJJ a+ Br^=mental gavel ` I.a nr^awr.ra BA sticky cloy•Y 3 gravel 152 157 CO 0 `O"•F'-"Ya° •� sr - • et B01.5re B mid Mist WM 157 150 .. ,...n,.rr,. F•wn • 1• _ • Bin clay 6 gram) 158 162 15 ,ma:saam Tv, 5 74 _ _ • 05 p l.w,5N rql. a T. s ._ _._ J _ - -II. —. ____ sass 1 ■ 16 acorns ^ Sas' Ns _ Q 0 Mnra,I.T,NfAN Jonnson N y L '.n V-Slot tatsloffis 4+ r• 5 s,e wn 012 ..am 1554- . • T. 166-0- • T L . F...v1. i.r a T. . _ C _.t sm sae Flvl. R TO RS ....a 511..1' r., '11., Se of P.S L , 16 Goss*tams am 1• T. _ • Sweat.tear N V..' N. T.wb ayr+ 25 a — Y.M.two in«a No 8MWl - 0 Pa vs.•M.ramrl.w,F*•••a+ 4vs I''Ill Z rr aaa.aY t»yr...was II In Wawa alaaNro..p.. N -0• )7) PUMP'. Nr.A2loes•Nr,s1 _ T 'y&- ■• CP O (a) WA I ER LEVELS:t•"4w.N,A0'.YV*a•wr 150' _. II O 156'-2- n mats NV at owl D.N Ike 15.1993 (3 aw...,m.0 a sY mum.V. Dais - W .r,,,,,,.v,.s40.ma.aa . AGO w.a n I ss.wM.wl a/ Jul 9.1993 Cn4 1 .vl lb.-993 • 191 WELL TEST:tue sm I mnstt.•t v-e a Wrw.WI..MS<*44 WELL coNBTRUCTtm CERTIFICATION: N `Ire as,'n wn 4 aMOO.n tats ^'F Icas.*.d Yyal a,n.prcauy w ca..-aO'd..•w Co a. Ev.q pis wn••a. . b.wW+h Oaf ^". tn.,l .MI,a1 VAI.•+pMn rI comsat.on•.nb•Ea Islowoh.suo I- Yak. ld man on n a n.m,-.o., m. atl i^F+•f.nwa., rIol*oa x•Iu IF rap aura...woe Ira Do CI Haman Sea a.•w.,..aaroa-n..+o..,*e.r,na•■•rw...u.•dKea NAB Mel WfNiamS OnlNn InC Q awl so Mmf WON .T{IT UCmansm,: I,. d0 1... mos. t, . Wane Tem Wow 0 Address 747 Wyse S mr Eta A 62 C (Signed* t-7 1.icense No. 9458 ■ L I- 0.00 9 Mar vm.OI,W'. e.-m. 2 go Y.....,. 1' . oevocv".me 2.5 ^* Contractors Registration NO. MCLWIU'08505 4.000 oa nnn•<r our wl• •b .•.w 4..4 n'ua /III"r'^ sat Ad 16.1993 Date A. 19 1993 Ta*0 n•.ae• wu a Atom sal smarts made 'alt 1''IN Figure 3.45.Stevens Well August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 76 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 CA WATER WELL REPORT CURRENT 0 ECOLOGY STATE OF WASHINGTON Notice of Intent No. W 176401 r CominwironINCN,.I«arr n GO ._ r.nam. Unlgue Ecology Well ID Tap No. AFC 591 QO 7.....mu-n :k.6M.LCClSTA,.,C^Cw Wlae Water Right Permit No a- I4-7q5 4 went N.mw 0 �_ PROPOSED USE •Oml«..0—e.g O u.e..rr O oil+ rn a...nr 0ergeor O Tow ION Property Owner Ramo Chan*Swartz 0 gs TYPE OF WORK: Pr.r.nUaor owes npoeeene.l 1 • •Ne,..N o O+wr,o AaVOO 0 ne 0 �.r O new. Well Street Address East Marrowstae RC r O Olos.r. 0 ra,.7 •CMY O BMW 0 rue N Clty Nordand County senerson_- 6 DIMENSIONS: or*.m.r1 -_ .__. +M« o«a_. 90-7 ..m o.tV rmep.^e.a _02,1.0!..1)2_.. I«. .4 C O CONSTRUCTION DETALS: location NW 114 _SE 1/4 %mt. 9 Tern. 29N R 1E W.M. C Camp rooM.d_1-Ow, Fmo _O It le M-5 ._.It a 0 �' 4 ,S-ern stun 1117 It to e22.12 It North LagWM _ _Day Min Sec Z RI 0 TSnend ..-E—dew Fn.,___.117AIEIR s 1. 92.10.1l2 4.— West Longitude Dog Min Sec EP.Wrs.m 0 r.. •WO 0 0 T,,,0,.r.r. -.al --- Tax Parcel No. 92'094005 C `P` '1 i'021'l — ^ °r-----^ CONSTRUCTION OR DECOMMISSION PROCEDURE pa a GxuW GwbeS.ma.cMalw..waralnn w,l.l,.x.•u,,.,.e1I... .. ._...it O -- V wa« plan _ a Ia Temnot-i sat.*Wtu,F<t,ew.win 5.IoM wee*,'a say Jry .iii•rr,r,r,.n',orate .0 Sawn. •M o No •ILw Imam 'a vow.rnaa.ree•UST MAmgNµSWEETS.NFCESIMt", 0 net ` Ita,.n.,rd.Meo HoustoA______-_ ...... IoMIW 1t (PROM to 0 O pP. __.__.Stemless V-Slol_ Ylaplr- Brown lop soil ____ __ 4 3 0 • oer r tr«a 020 I:.... 822.112. r T. _12.2-.12 4 g -_._ 1 14 G] Brown Celramed. taus.hard _ 97� 1 RI a.. Stt.ee rm. - __ t '4. _ a Guy nay ---' 1 IT RI o.n.l ans.. p v« M NU s..- -c__ Gray sandy clay y ___ 32 8 CD • Dan abl... Pew P to __ A O Or me sang,dry.Bose 38 45 r N Wren oreif/M. III vas O Ne ro.rr _.21--_- Blue med�mya gravel.coarse coarse std.W,'B_- _28 5 .� _+ sar.r,..a,.Iw ..Wed. large gravel.SWId.WM 12 18 GI • ON«r wan crWw..rll^.e eWINO 0 res•No C re..I..W, o.lildae4N .. , Graycay 55 91 U. _.. ..__.. _.. 13 PUMP: ri,.a..u..N.e.. .... y Water lasted 32 ppm colorlda with field lest kit at completron . _. tp ft law OWATER LEVELS: 0N4«nw.w.e r,t;.x.,ee. 99 -i -.-— — . Z $1444 In. TRJ It con. u.e. u.e 0c124.2003 N swoon moue e*MN ryU...cf Woe —_ - --_ VZ lCw,nave.ec■ _—_. . __— 12 WELL TEST: et...1,...1 amass eau....w.bee.daeae'.Iac Sit __ .. Sr SJ >, v...pa+p sr nave' Or« •Ib ly«q.rp.s r WNW gal . .di a .eedemn str ..... . .� V _—. m Visit______qn ars win___-__.___I ...peel w.' St +.p gel n.., . .mps^lWei __ In _.-- ----- JAN 0 6 2004 w I.«.,..rr 4.1e.lieSM.,«two Mon mom'arid an le.l.r 5..,r.«a.]Ana whop la ere As+. �aahlll l State Water T... Wm, In At law. r• — ---_ ______. .-- --. . -.... -. lIvrirIul.iU ttl ECOlIVV C 00 — — _ t� 0.55 tea TS ;a.r,n le 1.2 • ...rce* 7 .W. W.Ye p.la _Dtt]D�003—__ CeiM«aa ____01x24.2003 adL ..IM aw'm r wh.'e'.rev S n b ..__- nrs Y a-,.an 4. , pl.'s. woe WELL CONSTMICigN CM1WICAWCW I:No-W.alA.wu sets.,-.K....nuv irr r_N.nawn at .n..11.,i N[.IrH.v.ra vin M Nla...4.AU.O r.n...u.F.ua,e.a..at.,*.s.a end V. In-it r 2.e.. ',aa..neena.rebrm■,.«' 0T« •is e6aT«u,•'IttOtel SPA..Slit IC Cr h^• .tep.'.wet • •alaw O sn;',oar 0:.aria. NW,� + �rI L____. — nr.rt re,..:t eree s.trra 0011111g Cemp«ry Charlie's Dnning an.,.Io,.e,wens v, __OAS____- __. Address P_O.aox.12L-__._ • ..en.,stemma sew. \ Cory,State,2lp Port Nadloac Wa 98339 `fr*..a Ia.n«« -..._.__,. , Coaltrseto>'s Registration No. CIIARLC-OCSDO Date Cu 24.2033 Figure 3-46-Swartz Well August 25,2011 Copyright 0 2011 SNR Company 77 - Wetland Identification and Delineation and tream Reconnaissance Report .... Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nord land,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number 921094026 • _ CD CI Ez.ottrzfors Itegt,Com MN WATER WELL REPORT Application No ...I rd COPT -01ro;;.'41y" STAIR OF IIIVAIHEINCISON !snail tie 0:01 LU e..: (1) amine: ,...__ it aciti _.:7711,.y isse, ._ 6 „.3:i_*//55CcLage.?".-Jlesie..eAtrif‘ea C3 . (2) LOCATION OF WELL: counts .1€' Per P. Said •.S v.s... 9 T.29 N.It /E woo CD 0. . Or Searing and abeam*from motion or subdivision owner CC Ce _ CI = (3) PROPOSED USE: nototnut jet, Inehatrial ti antainato D (11) WELL LOG: cu >- 3 Irrigation 0 Tort Weil 0 Other 0 Pap'Deseribels1[014r.theracase,ow of materiel ond reelseram.mui AMP thirfrome Of a en out the hind 4.4 Memo of the hamlet in each defelata pewelealst.te A et Waal one mum foe worn Meow)Of ferematem. = In (4) TYPE OF WORK: `,Irg44 r,'tn'tIrn.:1 •••11 114ATTIIIAL 111t014 ..E - _- Nt..ti ot Method Dug 0 DOM CI T"----- 1.41_i 4. ... Derehrbed 0 Cable IIII tome 0 = CO not000ttotne c moos° MIMI 0 c - s 11111/11 ct c wirigiliPaPiet (5) DIMENSION s: 4 7tr.IIWAFT'Mi,[oillPreJFIIIIII o .• 44 Mild. Ailir ft Depth of compleied..IL_ _ 7_441.--fL — >- -__ E (4) CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: 0 0 4m Cillang installed: .1...._.. Pa.&..,.A9 „_ - —--- _i c ..........ri ___........•Teem from . .-ft.re—IL Re c- . - 0 al — .c LU e., Perforations: y..a N.it i. _____ CO 8 13 .IL ile—..ft. ---- ..I%, in "r?"' - c ---------44 (;4? - CI) ttl c•57 " OP _I ftt - 41"b) 44 - ftl "-v,'I. 47 c) 0 SOWS= Tao ii. N.a in wAke — C0 0 .= name — >. Dian IL G. ItI Grovel peeked: v..c MA Owes rev& _...---- •- — — ■ s_ . ---- 3 surface seal: yor9; No 0,..To ohm Moab?-....dr--.a. — — 1.- huter.el wed in an GaGE•A,Tionlaree-,...--.--- --- -- CD Old en! Waal& oorlieln umissilie water? re.0 NI 10 _____ Z 8 i >, . Land urface eimalio (I) WATER LEVELS: a n,,,. ,_ _ ..a. I , -Y. Math level 0 P. ft_Oslo.too of well DatiediCtir:. I i , 0 ^Malan preantee, -. ID Arsesten aeon is euntreited be ......_-_- . - i Cm, M.ete) _— _.— !_- aim , O (II) WELL TESTS: Donnumo is amount mitre Imal le Weenie Wow eutie level - . —_ Oath monad. IthitT___I_ .pi 747-e..p.‘. eac2....e. .,c,a(--- C w.•pomp Owl road*? yet 0 Ns p It TM.by wheal> . .... IV Ifte14. WHIk.ono I.iltaminive after en. WELL DRILLER'S STATEMENT g - • flit s well was drilled under my Itilledittinft and Ms report is :13 . a __..- .,,_....._ ____, •_" true to the best of my knowledge and belle! 0- g.e.eary elate tti.rnet taken NA*Mt Irlion Mint, turned off) (maim imel 8 onnamired from emit by to mites level' Tame Mute, iwitlet Tint Water L.341 Tune Watt,L.,,,,., NAME_ Al...1..K ...s. '..e d 1 4.14... ..., Iramon.firm.or comoratient Miry or petal) • ......._......................... 1..... = Tt i ZgY7S. Toe 11(.....f...D.Lc....4-. •1-- ............... .• ... . ..._........ ......... - - (UMW- 441. 1144. tie et . Temper/Mee Wto9f .00WdiWtht0t.tou .0 no 0 Lttenre No.....41‘..0.---....... . ilrei ADDITIONAL ILIDISTS tli NICT-SBARTI 411.10• Cc?of&,1.0 Figure 3-47-Taylor Well August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report ( 78 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number; 921094026 CA SI4ar CIAO so W069586 O WATER WELL REPORT OPOLENVI10O ACJ 775 r STATE OF WASHINGTON wAtew aorcr MOAT Ion 341 ` (1) OWNER.P.P. 0.9 31101111400 '+r+..r 3022 92nd Pt.NE_Bellevue.Wa 99004 0 Cpl • 12) LOCATION OF WELL:. ,. r. r Jetsam NE 'r• SE r+• s.' 9 129)4 ' IL w ar al cc 'RR STREET ADDRESS OF WELL w narrow sown. 394 MORyffiNa4 Ann 11.1a rn 9) (3) PROPOSED USE: M 'w °Tr 1101 WELL LOG or ASANOOIMIENT PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION r ' 3 *Arnow •Tint API is-,..3. Jrap W at Tower no n war r4.r.rrar/.am Itisnn Cl...tan D N w R..+w N nay,at war.A./..rd.,Yav,mr..N..n a seo m...l PP..C.e.V• _ (4) TYPE OF WORK.�.mr.na.m.rot..x tx rr.N.FO.r M..r-m../.+/ 7 -C M.NM Pony./ -Pop Bred OAIDese 040111 1 TG a.. Msetr.d :"Gror trw. C V..pr.» worn PP* Drown topioIl 2 Brown!alloy Sub 4 C tiro lightly cemented Wave'.clay 15 D O IS) DMQNBgNS. o..arwe.el r � 'Pr+ Doc 0.1-6 top °.rrm.a.. esa 5$61(, r Light brow^gravel.Gay la 31 Z N Brown pKAaC sa?9 515!' 31 42 E to CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: CI ` Brown dry sand.looms 42 7�1 o.w.a.a.trs. 5• Cr no-( 0 n fa im 4 t rC N..rS S p.. ha 74-7 " Ir I5r4.12 • 9.row-sarlo-W/B 76 7. _ C -"....p 5' sr•. pp. 50+112 • 1. .s- -i 2 . Water tsar 45 ppm Ct Cnee 76 N Brown cemented Crave) ow yew 77 611, { L oamram.- 'red a' • Water)ea:_l20 moo 61 0 a ` 'w > w .o.�oa . e Brown seed,W 13 61 0 O !.,.soon>.a•• °• Water teat.°w1 50,0 pCm 53 I l0 '0 perferararla h,o a to u7 C R a.YOreN rlom n To Completed Water last r.50 nor'ttlrortle m cotter...-. fy r ( n To r 03 IMP. - Yin Pe Q ayrw.s.l mama HD.MpT1 r Go rm. Stainless V-Slot weew 0 4L.. OW, 51e va 010 rmn 75.4.1/2 x It 50.41J2 It _ - 0 a DMA 6M%a. arm n TO j C D... _ SIoI so. Prr. n To I RGnwa wk.4 rn ' b Su.ova... . R Gra...h;eslra II to n _._ Seagate*. 4 On Po To owl ay.' 32 • __- I— Wows arT n».l Med Chip BOMOIlaa — O Do rrY Poo paean llV.a...., roll ' OA. Z two 44 pater Own r sort R. VT Prose P beano r.a co _ — '06 (7) PUMP I+•^a«sr•y sons r,p ____._ - -, .- — - T CR (al WATER LEVELS:1-.'14).:row*.a.11-^m.».war 80 • -- _• O I)MYMr. 79.3 n nai.IN>..I 00. Mat 13.1996 __. U U rc lJJ nr..wr.w nmvuro er paI cwrrp....e Mar 13.1995 Pr- - tw phrMa r... Mar IC.1%a O (9) WELL TEST:or**saws w...a ewes to..r<0.4 Y Was a amp Iron cabins -,rro'r IP <rr, 'wpm' WELL CONSTRUCTOR CERTIFICATION: • vwb ia.nn an " QwWM'.../ m'f moo MV...-qr•W'^Y.we I f C•YUfrar trr CK M ion E .601 pet m.n.4, . 4.aetwn awes PP MTp1..o..0,re,Vo Vow,pt..M a•.fw%M~dam MIS.a,a1 L pa non*Pk I. d..N'.rr Mr SO oorammaYT/.C/✓rma AVr.l1'r,M to op now',to.►lp.as blr 1- coos L 4..,.ra.0Sl..Twwr.a rnarMrn P.w'VrW"Noah.,Y..■n.yaIYJ T]m R ..I..f ..Tr w.. NAME Charlie's DtiNtng IlVaor tma or Coo:Wran 0T warp l.w.l tn. war tar.. Iona saw,lows N �� Add.,.. P.G Boo 127 H 379 ID (Signed) ( yd.' r /C License NO 0456 .0 w lM1r I- -n.et ws ap•rnr 1 re'err..n 4" • 44.41o•"•'I•• 2 . 'r1 Contractor's R.gia1Mbn No CHARLD'06600 ♦%M T•I1..l..m nil wr It b h. 41.wr10. Inn. o•• Mir 13.1995 Date Mar 18 199e I amp"...war NM•Tr tomer sass...T ,I y..Mr war Figure 3-48-Thompson Well August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company 79 Wetland Identficabon and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 Y 0 SwGMNO /'I��,� e�e!��� ph,Deigirol l et EE P�"�" WATER WELL REPORT {aaouE WELL ID./'.L.4c..a(.►6 - 0 tree Copy—Owners Copy STATE:OF WASHING ray eoy 6p.tpMMl o— —..— mwo copy—Dogleg'.COPT C7 O (t) OWNER: r...fa _ — —. ...". -"/ /k(O O��1g CI -- SGt !. Z N/o•• /CTw4 GI •s. *.. � � (2) LOCATOR OF WELL: coot?1i'`��'� , L!� 9�SS.� 0 •• (2i) STREET ADDRESS OF WELL p.m.*+Woe 49 �f /Y?•fik,04 �2 I/d1eDC.4flLz > (7) PROPOSED USE: 1( 0o" • o.,,o.- 14.1.0.. Ii (10) WELL LOG or ARANDONNIEN'T PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION = ...Vow- tot ro,-.er, Jw•b F.or..Cbnlro W1 Wooed 0l- - °.M.1bMr O1M1r0 (/1 coon... frt too _ D.R .r.!o../ d r4'Y ni o ndlIMl 1.•n•Tenor Wane..an al Wa..w VW b egg" Wen me. d..t some a"ton"es 0 r (4) TYPE OF WORK: xnwa Par wl �^ —___ NAIVaIL IIOII r0 IT; O R W r Flown,at Mod- �4? -- — . (5) DIMENSIONS: C. a.••.I-44. — ^ Qs _ t '2 412 G >- A X99 _.a or, aeaebwrr 98 / �QAM/ i � — - . • -.. /.2 O 161 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: - -I . waded • 6„ • II."'"t -III R 84 .k1/i4 '4_.! - 'i2lLL 1'- — •g1�.. �j d TheM"r' rl pa YO. . L—• CD `O 1v.el r. Tun APll Sign isr _646A-rT4 CAe� r Zr--._ tyro al(wno"v.. _ . .FaL.6ua ...-.f.5nr l• - 00 PYbreso lbA, I.b- - - — — - .__ — . P.brrron.from�— l r —• '• --__ — — — Pnb..bv:.lam .lb_ l yw.� ` _ Se Pow seeic—Pe C.I —IMP W— —... C Of.A.—Sloe pr-_'�_b.m—_—II b R —_.--�-._ ROmni Nigel 'a.n No�9aa a0 r -_ 'r0 Cassel pseud•.• —p1 _ _tb__ I -_--. ______ _ ' ~ WWISMI: Waa rbu b•1,r OrFl.r / r—�' '^+ w O rrr„lyrlY wain - __,�1— — u TYRO-Woo m"b.l YnY.etb anro I•a.C] b O -- --. — _oywaa.W _ .. P) *Iaaaaw a.. — , — ' CO N..rlarwll Weft On ..._ _- -- Li - O roe - _ (Ti PUT: EWviecluHy.Norm J. -NL__'_ — - -- —_ __ T • (B) WATER LEVELS: s4•41.0•00•16.010^ ow wonoa _ t U c:..,",,: 93i' a..r. Mon Dr 1l' — WILL CONSTRUCTOR CERTIFICATION: mow wow•=OWN A __. I cook-cud are'e.ooropl rnpor,ed!r lc,cm.uvtbn d ice cal and es --S.• .a aLT� -- wmp arum O" a ql d ab ve lee ee stowlo n nowt. end r viol ire O _ to'noose.,morrow adore N•ale to my out knave**,end earn •'•• (0) WELL TESTS: cre.lrr.bala.lalWl bwlbbraiaWe.rle roof N w„,,"a„m ,n"a'Y..❑ lleK I yet A.alrT some E r'ntl ___ ....rm.,rl tal.me.air N.. Waal...R/ / (J• k ! �V— ` L L<..+.N. d wm•—_reW`.eu"n roes aeaawMfmtldl low r.an•ulra/lle....l ' tS'.7 .1+•,,•� — 0 -..In W Lore. ib.r WOW Weal 1W. WSW Le.N OrkaOWe - — __ — -_..._— (USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY)•` I..Iwa aa. ' ems bed 1&arise"A, —Iwo .no AIh*.a!I.a Action employe' For fpl. ..b J_ ,w Ecology Kin EWa$Ooporrarary Aire . .___ _ Wm..l r 9Z- oat aorllrnmodl.al needs.amua the wa1Y Rasou"aes Proven at(206) T.w.la._ —rpm --. 4774600-TM TOO our**.a(206)407.6006 T."r.rwa osier_._ ys 7.�bt ca e- 0 WY No..ue out••1 -or Figure 3-49-Avery Well August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 80 I Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number. 921094026 - -_ y 0 Fr plies n redoes• cn•..tX WATER WELL REPORT sf•n�..-'M� 02 r!s Fs.00•a n F.., - _-- r r/) w1an•0Y-D-o•...'' STATE OF WASHINGTON - • n.YO Copy-DIM.Gw! M1•]r R9_XI/prs"i.e Ttw�..� `0 (I) OWNER: N... f. r l,u .CSAAQ.k]' -----_ -.___. Ammo dr/ i/ z P T-(-'.r._roei.4 0 o.fY (2) LOCATION OF WELL: c•.4. 1IP'f. ci.._ —_ �7 _ NE... . ,e.c 7 ,22, Rls_..r In (20) STREET ADOORESS OF WELL(r.•r.r edema) Me.�Pdlr 1CO4T - /fA '_S7r2AL' /- o at r 3 PI PROPOSED USE: .1 De"I onw rd•etrbi ^ LArkip.l O 11W WELL LOG or ABANDONMENT PROCEDURE DESCRIPTOR 0 ItrIRA N L]D•• ■• TINA WMI 7 OtXa u •enter basin.by beIr el.r•car.era or,.Y• I aft1.doer.,OW Owe in pIY•Yr 01 eedtr.Yr Ina w w IW V.a Me rYMW•n Nat seat*aeeaeMN, +L+ (4) TYPE OF WORK:U"'n'r•"iin1ira'r +I et IOW OW Ilene ter••r I mom a r.f.a•I.a. { er nee Inlet 01.) SAIMIL IRrI .'d o abandoned.,- New ell M.D.ad Dug D Bore ❑ T I O p ` v - O R.COn04tfo.aa O 6)6,4 Raw•i] MINI U L�'JfPCQW 1`I r L.S1•.Q Sail _ .LS— a +' (5) DIMENSIONS: derelr of w•. b YgRR•. /�+ ,f y/N v LS Z AS E on Rea I I.•1 0.661)64 coROUI•e MII /p C -n. �'� O (6) CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: �.0� 5� Z' = cCMAIIII elnlbd: b •• 0. 9"1+ a b_j_Aif._n. ,�,lQA:}IC�_...._A raid u1....- ..._... -_ - -< Nr.w.e Dr..ee. a r I 1�J/A/2 - 'roar .0 le.rtr••r _ _ _�_ak ? ehtiml:.O kt O y„ Ter..•.• [] -- Dr..wa n.w •. R.P lni'(r rl �n J ---1.F� 0 OTyne a.rlwelr...e_..__ - _,t4i/ 4o eri 1/h --:.. / • C9.20 a penrenw• nosy It - T _ fC1 prlrelb.e tom—. .-web A, f77 w fa p.rpalone from _ _n le a l ' - Soreme Vr5a Sol J - O1 .c alartelectweea name .I..• • _..104 D• 1•.• N cD••m _SIa1.1• __Joel 11 N Y Ir Wesel pacte.* .wl_ i..$ ..._.. - 3 OI..•arced Roo BN n ._ I� Sern•ce Der yea W' M 1ti�1Mrr1 d a O ...I•...•N UNY t1V� E.�fr�. -.� _— -- I ■ Z Ale•01.1.N eeaam arlaetY aY•rt YrL .eX I N Dark arm. � --_ . '.coot«fw. _ I a) wlnne of...Yee e0 - O 1-13 (7) PUMP: ...0.1•00.«'..•.. _.. -;. 0 WATER LEVELS . .woe.elevates l (e) .ew.+w..NiwY �.- —. 1-1""-K:11) U st.f.c..r 77 .War tap et eel Dole `.. _ _.____• -- W ••••••c•■•■,.• -. —t.'armors oak Deb _- W ...moans/Am.canter by Me*MM.elan o so 19) WELL TESTS: D.••ra,.n 0.0. .11M••d .elte tool C «...m..0 n•.rae.000.L 1 Iwo_ •Amen moat WELL CONSTRUCTOR CERTIFICATION: C .,.o pa•I••non ____R.•toad 1. ItS___no 1 rnnMru cted and:0.eccp1 rfpon•.D:Mr ICY cPlrranm•Cl 1X04 well. C - --- ------- and Xs cnnfptence ..nn III Wf"nylon wee construe Iran stemma. - . -__-.. - - •• Mrene.e weed and Ina•nrorinM,on reported above•l.1145 to my bow cs Q R•cn..h oar.(tam t akw .M M e.taro r C I.•M4 eWO(sae M..mewed aep.f.dD•rte LeM•I • Qt bon 1•0110010• ,..wel) ()..�_ '� Co Q ... ...w. row earl... TM .rrlw NAME _3 O/C4 .l .Q £L,..j Coo /No ._ _..-__..-- -_ y.►VADIL MY OM cads tlm0 MPS M Marl L -_ -_... _ _..._._ - Addr•a._1.Ldc CNE (•�4 • _ Se(9 Caw.. c,4-• W.•of r..1_ [�N -�.Iy� ._ ^Lbw•.Ne ag 25: . /Wet a..Jr--*NANO.MO .eremites slew M. (S•ORea Mel MRLMe Cademiers .7 q ♦neat . .—=Wow.ab Yell WY 11.M t••. Re1�t�RY.M"�e /� /2-/2-- 1•d! An.e.n new e1∎a A.I. r� "a "8PY?7-p0 Dale I...•.etl••I«br_WY•e•r•WY•RY1rYaT YMD ww �"'��(USEV�`�/AOCAT�1O/NwA•ll.. WETS IF NECESSARY) 1cvm 1 A lit••n .'MO eta Figure 3.50-Wright Well August 25,2011 Copyright 0 2011 SNR Company 81 Wetland Identification and Delineation and tream Reconnaissance`eport Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA - n P-rcelNum;r: 1211'.12. a- Most the well logs for the water wells located in the immediate vicinity of the subject property appear to be relatively o consistent with the geologic maps for the subject property and vicinity, indicating that glacial till material is the dominant 0 J surface deposit in this portion of Marrowstone Island. However, the well logs also suggest that at surface or near surface clay deposits are also relatively common in this area. What are less common are the deposits seen on the CD subject property, primarily because none of the wells were located in the relict glacial meltwater channel; however,the s Miller well log(for a property on Disney Road)does describe the upper recessional outwash deposits identified by SNR ° on the subject property. = Unfortunately the well log for the water well on the subject property is not in the Ecology well log database, perhaps ° because this well is old enough to not have required a driller's permit. It is known that the well on the subject property is currently in use and that it apparently has elevated levels of chloride, suggesting that the well is pumping a mixture Y� PP Y � 99 9 P P 9 of fresh and marine water in a mixing zone(this may be sea water intrusion or natural mixing depending on the aquifer )- characteristics and depth). o It should be noted that the well logs typically describe glacial till as"hardpan"and"gravel,sand,and clay". None of the o well logs studied describe finding water bearing material near the surface, with the shallowest water found at approximately 42 feet below the ground surface and ground water typically being encountered approximately 70-110 feet below the ground surface. The well logs suggest that in most cases the wells were completed in what appear to be advance outwash deposits c that underlie the glacial till surface materials (however some wells may actually be screened in older recessional v� outwash deposits based on the well log description of the water bearing materials). The geologic maps suggest that advance outwash deposits underlie the glacial till which is common in the Puget lowlands continental glacial deposits. Advance outwash deposits are generally the most productive ground water bearing materials; in some areas, it appears that older glacial deposits(recessional outwash)are the primary aquifer materials that produce ground water. Based on field studies and well logs, there is no evidence that near surface ground water is present beneath the subject property or anywhere else in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. However, the subject property is located in a Saltwater Intrusion Protection Zone (SIPZ), which means that any new well development on the subject property would be restricted. Fortunately, the Jefferson County PUD #1 brought municipal water supplies to Marrowstone Island (including the subject property) which means that if future development is planned, the required water supplies will be available. Because there is no evidence of near surface ground water being present on or in the immediate vicinity of the subject property and because of the topography and surface geology, saturated soil conditions cannot develop on the subject property. 3.4 Surface Water Hydrology SNR's surface water hydrology studies include regional surface water studies to allow SNR to evaluate the effects surface water hydrology have on the area being studied, especially where surface water has been channelized. Additionally, in some cases the existing surface water hydrology that is observed may be influenced by historic drainage ditches, irrigation ditches, stormwater ditches (conveyances), and historic logging drainage ditches (and logging roads), which artificially influence the surface water hydrology. Historic ground disturbing activities, such as logging activities, agricultural activities, and generalized clearing activities (common in shoreline areas to maintain views) often block natural drainage and in some cases this was intentional, usually to detain surface water collected from larger areas that are drained to a steeper sloped area. If significant amounts of diverted surface water flows were allowed to run down steep slopes,slope erosion will occur,as could down slope flooding. August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Repoli I 82 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 Also, this area of the Olympic Peninsula is in the rain shadow, which means that the annual precipitation is much less t" than other areas of Western Washington, and it means that during the summer months any crops that are planted will _° typically require irrigation. On Marrowstone Island, the source of irrigation would be a water well or an irrigation ditch system that has a source of stored surface water for use during the summer dry months. There is no evidence of historic reservoirs or agricultural ponds on or in the immediate vicinity of the subject property so it is assumed that the ca irrigation was provided by the onsite well. ° SNR's field studies focus on the surface water hydrology on and in the vicinity of the subject property to identify o potential sources of wetland and stream hydrology (surface water hydrology will only create wetland hydrology if the ci ground water is already at or very close to the surface or if unique topographic and geologic conditions are present). e SNR's field activities and research include fluvial geomorphologic, surface water hydrology, stratigraphy, structural a geology, geomorphology, and hydrogeologic studies to identify the sources of surface water and to identify and describe potential stream headwaters where possible. The subject property does have storm water from a municipal roadside ditch system diverted into the northern and western portions. The storm water diverted into the northern portion of the subject property enters a manmade ° drainage ditch presumed to be excavated with a backhoe or trackhoe. The excavated soils (spoils) were apparently °o placed on the west side of the ditch which was somewhat shortsighted because this blocked natural ephemeral surface c, water flows from reaching the natural ephemeral drainage channel the ditch was apparently excavated in and has c resulted in upgradient ponding to the west of this ditch (and is apparently why "lateral' manmade ditches have been excavated in problematic areas,where ponding still occurs even after these ditches were excavated). ° ° Precipitation had occurred on 3 of the 10 days prior to the field studies being conducted on June 6, 2011 (Figure 3-51 - Weather History from May 28—June 6, 2011 from Weather Underground, 2011). However, some of the photographs shown in this report are from the March 15,2011 site visit and reconnaissance activities,where heavy rain occurred on the day of the site visit and for 8 of the 10 days prior to this site visit(Figure 3-52—Weather History from March 5— March 15, 2011 from Weather Underground, 2011). Based on observations made during the March 15,2011 site visit, significant quantities of storm water enter the subject property during storm events. However, SNR could not locate any stormwater detention facilities in the air photographs or in the field except a small diversionary pond on the parcel located immediately north of the culvert that drains this storm water onto the subject property under Disney Road. Observations ton Temp.t'51 DOW P010114El Mumbrcy l%5 Sa Level Press.4n. VnIOMy(spml Mod prep TieuP,I, Eveny May Oath avg Iw high 4v9 low high 4n9 10W high aW low high avg low high avg high sum 28 57 52 46 13 42 40 87 74 55 29% 2997 2995 10 10 10 12 7 IT CCC 29 61 56 50 49 MI rl 76 69 57 2991 2995 2992 10 10 10 10 4 - 000 '0 60 55 50 46 43 41 37 70 51 2996 2992 2989 10 10 10 10 5 - 000 31 61 54 48 54 at 42 81 76 60 2999 2994 2992 10 10 10 0 5 • 003 Nan 1011 Tomo.('8) POW Po101771 Humidity l%l 5a Level head.(n) Vnt445 Undo/ Wind(rM) %GCa(n) (vent. Jun high 099 low high fig IOW nyA sv9 low high avg low high avg low high av9 high gum 57 54 50 49 47 45 09 82 67 3000 2998 29% 10 10 7 8 4 • 004 Nan 2 59 54 50 51 48 43 93 83 59 3005 3000 2995 10 9 5 9 4 - 0.10 Nan 64 56 48 49 46 a 93 73 52 30 I3 30 09 30 05 10 10 5 13 5 20 0 04 Nan 4 71 60 50 52 49 46 93 69 49 30 13 30 05 29 96 10 IO 9 III 5 18 000 73 64 54 51 49 46 80 59 42 2999 2995 2990 10 10 10 7 4 000 6 70 62 54 53 51 48 90 71 St 2995 2991 2989 10 10 9 18 5 21 000 Comm ON.nae6 Fie Figure 3-51 -Weather History from May 28-June 6,2011 from Weather Underground,2011 August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company 83 Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance`eport Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun P.r.-I N m.;r: 921194026 >• Observations CD ° 2911 Tamp.l'F) Dew Pent('F) 9mngny(%) 50 level Press.{n) 9isnpite DMM) Wald 10901 Precq.(n) Events -1 O Wr 041 079 low 041 499 00 O,plt 499 1pw 94911 1.9 bw 094, 09 00 94911 av9 11,88, sum W - 46 42 39 39 37 34 99 81 63 30 20 30 14 30 06 10 l0 10 13 7 23 000 6 15 41 37 37 39 33 93 81 69 3013 3005 2993 10 10 5 7 3 - 002 Ran 7 46 40 35 36 32 26 93 75 49 2995 2993 2990 10 8 2 9 2 - 000 CC 0 8 18 42 37 43 37 32 93 82 71 3012 2994 2978 10 7 2 12 7 18 005 Ran 9 53 48 42 46 42 36 90 81 66 3004 2992 2977 10 8 3 29 13 38 878 Ran 10 52 46 41 41 39 35 90 79 59 3110 29 76 29 61 10 8 5 37 17 48 0 57 64n 0 II 48 44 39 39 35 31 87 II 54 3014 3009 3000 10 10 4 17 11 26 003 Ran Z 12 16 44 42 41 39 36 89 83 73 3003 2995 2988 30 9 3 21 8 24 046 Ren 13 48 45 42 45 41 35 90 84 71 29 97 2974 29 58 10 0 2 24 10 31 080 Ran 14 51 46 42 43 40 }7 09 80 63 3011 2998 2900 10 8 4 32 19 39 082 Ran IS 93 48 42 45 41 38 93 81 66 2983 2965 2952 10 8 2 24 14 31 082 8,.41 Thundelton,, c Canna 0elmteC roe III. 0 _... . 4.1 Figure 3-52-Weather History from March 5.15,2011 from Weather Underground,2011 CD The municipal stormwater system in the vicinity of the subject property does not have any apparent stormwater CO treatment facilities located in the drainage basin that drains onto the subject property, even though this storm water J includes runoff from significant road surfaces. Although Jefferson County does not have a Phase II Municipal 9 9 Y P ° Stormwater NPDES permit, the County must, at a minimum, meet the requirements of the Stormwater Management y Manual for Western Washington, Ecology, 2005 for stormwater facilities, including roadside ditch systems. The County must also meet the water quality requirements of the Water Quality Act of 1987 (33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.), and Chapter 173-201A WAC-Water quality standards for surface waters of the state of Washington, and Chapter 173-204 WAC-Sediment management standards, and Chapter 173-220 WAC- National pollutant discharge elimination system permit program, and the requirements of the Clean Water Act per 40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter D. It is unclear why Jefferson County is diverting storm water onto the subject property without apparent easements or municipal conveyances (or other stormwater facilities). However, if Jefferson County is required to obtain a Phase II Municipal Stormwater NPDES permit this could be problematic, because the County would be required to maintain control of its storm water to the outfall (or transfer this storm water to a co-permittee, secondary permittee, or government entity) and this outfall is on the subject property, approximately 1,200 feet south of where the culvert discharges the storm water onto the subject property. The diversion of this storm water onto the subject property and the manmade stormwater ditch is impacting the surface water hydrology of the subject property as is the diversion of storm water from roadside ditch on the western side of Baldwin Road which enters the subject property via a culvert under Baldwin Road. Additionally, based on observations of the storm water flows in the roadside ditch system that bound the north side of Disney Road, the west side of East Marrowstone Road, and both sides of Robbins Road, the water quality of this storm water may not meet federal and state requirements. As can be seen in the photographs of Figures 3-53 through 3-58, the storm water from the March 15, 2011 event resulted in significant frothing which can mean that the water quality of this storm water is impaired and does not meet State and Federal discharge requirements. It is unclear why part of the roadside ditch flow is diverted into the pond on the private property located immediately north of the culvert beneath Disney Road (Miller Property), because these flows converge at the culvert that discharges this storm water onto the subject property. August 25,2011 Copyright m 2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 84 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number 921094026 r ' CO , o r : r en �" G7 '1' 4i, lJ m�h _� % r- ' i may,\�� {' • rq 'sP �' < 1*t-0 e ed.+ - , . k; z giN ayt�: a ■ 'tI x„- `tP r � t w. a 0 P r °) o. rh, o' r7<y�`� ` '»1 ,$. y yq E� r ti o via' `"" � `.S rffiii . #f. 0r +'., ,s `� .i 'X Vii:` O ■Figure 3.53—Photograph of Storm Water in Municipal Roadside Ditch that Bounds the North Side of Disney Road on March 15,2011 q� ♦- fill d µ - 'y e� - � rj a_ i , 0 Itit 3•- .:4 1 "� s i • _ Iv • Figure 3-54—Photograph of Disney Road Roadside Ditch Diversion onto Private Property with Pond on March 15,2011 August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company 85 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 _ o A 4 � rF': O e ' • • O W C7 O C S G z QS C7 t- . J f LUJ ' Figure 3.55-Photograph of Roadside Ditch on Disney Road During Initial Rainfall on March 15,2011 It should be noted that it had only been raining for approximately 30 minutes when these municipal storm water flows were photographed. The total rainfall for this day was 0.62 inches which suggests that the volume and velocity of these flows would have been greater as the storm became more intense (there were thunderstorms on March 15, 2011). The primary source of the flow onto the northern portion of the subject property is the roadside ditch system on the north side of Robbins Road and the roadside ditch system on the west side of East Marrowstone Road. The only surface water flow on the subject property other than minor nonpoint source ephemeral drainage is from storm water diverted onto it from municipal culverts (Jefferson County). None of the maps, including the WDFW SalmonScape map (Figure 4-1 — WDFW SalmonScape Map) suggest any streams are present or in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. This is further supported by SNR's hydrogeology findings that strongly suggest that near surface ground water is not present on or in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. Perennial and seasonal streams must have ground water base flow to allow these features to be streams, otherwise they will be ephemeral conveyances(and manmade ephemeral drainage features)that are not regulated under critical areas or state and federal codes (other than water quality). Based on field observations and research, the primary hydrology on the subject property other than natural ephemeral drainage is municipal storm water. August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 86 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number 921094026 IV i l" f, r. . o , . �v v 0.0 �' z ' a- r t 2 N i D ! 1. D 1 D ._ a I =4 - •--- -A.' t z r `- _ �,yas: r o "' iF, ,,, w 0 ti o;u k k Y is a. V. 0 Figure 3-56-Photograph of Roadside Ditch Storm Water Diverted to Private Pond on March 15,2011 -Note Frothing c. , .2 Y � ' i� _ 2 ♦ ` 15 4 La. .y2`\ 1 Figure 3-57-Photograph of Outflow of Storm Water from Pond on Private Property and Storm Water in Ditch entering Culvert under Disney Road on March 15,2011 August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 87 Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 t , O h � ` C7 W CC • Q t J - �� �: 414 4t J h• fl )" A r 'fi k8:' iT Figure 3-58-Photograph of Roadside Ditch Stormwater Diverted onto Subject Property on March 15,2011-Note Frothing August 25,2011 Copyright 4,2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report 88 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson 111 Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 4 WETLAND IDENTIFICATION AND DELINEATION Per the requirements of the 1972 amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act(known as the Clean Water a Act or CWA of 1977)as amended, SNR normally conducts wetland studies in accordance with the United States Army z Corps of Engineers (USACE) Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Wetlands Research Program ° Technical Report Y-87-1, Environmental Laboratory, 1987; and, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regional — �I Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region, m Version 2, May 2010, ed. J. S, Wakeley, R. W. Lichvar, and C. V. Noble. ERDCIEL TR-08-13. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. z Army Engineer Research and Development Center (Regional Manual). Until March 14, 2011, SNR also conducted — wetland studies in accordance with the State of Washington Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual, Ecology, 1997 (State Manual). However, with the changes to WAC 173-22-035 that states delineations should be done a according to the currently approved federal manual and supplements; SNR only uses the State Manual as a reference —I (not a guidance document), using the Regional Manual and the most recent National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils(NTCHS)hydric soils manuals as guidance for conducting wetland studies in Washington state13. SNR conducted the wetland and other critical areas studies on and in the vicinity of the subject property in accordance with Jefferson County Code (Chapter 18.22 Critical Areas Article VII). It should be noted that SNR conducted a comprehensive wetland study in accordance with the Regional Manualt4. m SNR also uses the following references per the Regional Manual and the Clean Water Act: 1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2010. Field Indicators of z Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 7.0. L.M. Vasilas, G.W. Hurt, and C.V. Noble (eds.). USDA, m NRCS, in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils; 2. Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 11th ed. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC;and, 3. Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil Taxonomy, A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys,2nd ed. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service,Washington , DC. It should also be noted that the Corps Regional Manual requires that the most recent version of the NTCHS guidance for identifying soils that have developed hydric soil characteristics be used and that the NTCHS released a newer version than was used in the current Corps Regional Manual;therefore, SNR used the most recent NTCHS document listed above for guidance on identifying hydric soils. This NTCHS document requires the use of the latest version of the NRCS Keys to Soil Taxonomy (Keys) for evaluating hydrology and soil types. The version of the Keys used by SNR is the 11th edition. SNR only uses these manuals for guidance purposes, basing wetland determinations on the actual code and the science necessary to make these determinations. Hydrology and soils determinations are always made by or under the direct supervision of a hydrogeologist licensed in the state of Washington to conduct the level of study required, including ground water hydrology associated with saturated soils, and to make the required interpretations. All of SNR's wetland studies and reports are conducted by or under the direct supervision of this licensed hydrogeologist and are signed and stamped by him. SNR's reports are also formatted and include additional information that is required by the Washington State Geologist Licensing Board for geologic, hydrogeologic,and engineering geology studies. Y 9 9 9 13 Some munidpalifies and State agencies have not changed their wetland guidance document requirements,which is why SNR still uses the State Manual as a reference and uses other required manuals as references;however,since most wetland determinations can be considered to be jurisdictional by the Corps of Engineers under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act,SNR only uses the latest Corps of Engineers Manual as a guidance document(and the most recent NTCHS manuals as is required by the Corps). 14 The regional manual is supplemental to the original Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual,1987,which is still in use. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 89 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Cnmfv Parcel Number 9711940 Prior to conducting wetland identification and delineation field activities on the subject property, SNR Company c conducts research to obtain a basic understanding of the area to be studied and to provide information regarding areas that may require more study. This research includes the review of NRCS soils maps to gather information on the soils • that may be present in the study area, review of National Wetlands Inventory maps to determine if wetland areas may z have been potentially identified on or in the vicinity of the subject property by the United States Fish and Wildlife 7, Service(USFWS),Jefferson County maps, USGS topographic maps for topographic information, USGS geologic maps '+' for interpreted geology and depositional environments, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife service maps to determine if any species of interest or threatened and endangered species may be located on or in the immediate z vicinity of the subject property, WDFW SalmonScape to determine if potential fish bearing (and non fish bearing) cc streams are located on or in the immediate vicinity of the subject property,and several other references that are either z referenced directly in the text of this report or are provided in the references section of this document. 0 F- The following subsection discusses SNR's research; and, the subsequent sections discuss the history of the area and a where possible, the history of the site. It also discusses the field activities conducted on and in the vicinity of the site, and other activities SNR conducted to complete the comprehensive wetland identification and delineation activities for the subject property. z 4.1 Research W ° As previously discussed, SNR conducts research to better understand the geomorphology, hydrology, hydrogeology, geology, stratigraphy, structural geology, fluvial geomorphology, soils, vegetation,topography, site history, and habitat z functions of the subject property and vicinity. The NRCS soils and USGS/DNR geologic maps, Jefferson County topographic data and maps, LiDAR imagery, and USGS topographic map are presented in the previous section of this W report,the rest of the maps and data gathered during SNR's research are presented in this section of this report. SNR also reviews county, state of Washington, and federal codes prior to conducting wetland studies to ensure that the studies meet the code requirements and to allow SNR to evaluate code compliance with other aspects of the Clean Water Act and state water quality codes while conducting field activities. When possible, SNR also interviews long time residents who have lived in the vicinity of the area being studied. For these studies, SNR interviewed Mr. Kevin Miller the owner of parcel number 921094027, with a property address of 191 Disney Road, Nordland,WA. Mr. Miller has lived at this address for at least 20 years and has personal knowledge of the surface water hydrology, land disturbances, and the history of the subject property, including historic clearing and grading activities. 4. 1 . 1 WDFW SalmonScape Map The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife SalmonScape mapping program includes a database of all potential streams known to the Department and includes information about any fish observed in these streams. The SalmonScape map of the subject property and vicinity does not suggest any streams or other critical areas water bodies are located on the subject property or immediate vicinity(Figure 4-1). The Jefferson County GIS apparently uses the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) maps to identify potential fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas (streams) and critical areas. This map from the Jefferson County GIS (Figure 4-2) suggests that there are no streams on or in the immediate vicinity of the subject property and only one stream in the southern"tip"of Marrowstone Island. However, this map suggests wetland areas are present in the same general location that is suggested on the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Wetlands Inventory map. August 25,2011 Copyright 02011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 90 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 c n ' 1 —{ �« ' r m i • �� , , UBJECT PROPER _ !• • T 9 w t i` z 0 m R0M THE WPM SALMONSCAPE,2011 �``' 111 '.- r Figure 41 •WDFW SalmonScape Map of Subject Property and Vicinity,2011 m sa —..).1......."Ni-.!--H•"6„,...j, _ 1 if 41" r17 –t ......., , al I I 1070160 /i ■ I0001616 0110110 01•00111 1 0011611 Z IMMO 1011011 lei _ 1 1,1.6 ,. 1106 ..SUBJECT PROPERTY 1"", 1111 - .ANN *maw - orm0.0• 44 N. 111161610 !MOO I .W.q 01010 :1 1110 1� NM 60® 7010, 07 lern ...:.. .101.. er 112 '01I ROM JEFFERSON COUNTY('19.2011. Figure 4-2-Jefferson County Critical Areas Map Showing Wetlands and Streams,Jefferson County GIS,2011 August 25,2011 Copyright ID 2011 SNR Company 91 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parrnl Number 921094026 4. 1 . 2 USFWS Wetland Inventory Map z i o The Corps of Engineers 1987 Manual (that is supplemental to the 2010 Regional Manual) includes several areas of 1— suggested research to conduct before conducting a wetland study. One of the areas of recommended research is the ▪ USFWS National Wetlands Inventory maps that are based on remote sensing data. These maps are based on a classification system developed in a USFWS manual entitled Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats15 of —1 the United States, Lewis M.Cowardin,Virginia Carter, Francis C. Golet,and Edward T. LaRoe, U.S. Department of the o Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Biological Services, 1979. It should be noted that the USFWS methods used to identify wetland area on these maps do not meet current best available science (BAS) requirements established by the Growth Management Act of 1990(as revised). SNR's research also includes a search for any published reports or other documents that provide information on the o geology, hydrology, hydrogeology, soils, stratigraphy, and other information necessary to interpret the hydrology, 1— geomorphology, fluvial geomorphology, hydrogeology, structural geology, soils, depositional environment, and other • information that is useful in identifying the surface and subsurface features on and in the vicinity of the subject LL property. This research includes a detailed search of the Geological Society of America publications database for all GSA and related publications, the USGS database, the DNR database, the NRCS database, Soil Science Society of z America database, and the Society of Wetland Scientists database. W cm Among the first databases SNR checks before accepting a project are the municipal critical areas maps and the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory maps. Even though these maps were not intended to identify known, studied, and rated wetland areas, they can be useful for screening purposes, because these were designed to suggest where J wetland areas may be located(and can also provide information on potential streams in an area). ,„ The municipal critical areas maps may include classifications for wetlands and streams(typically using the Washington State Department of Ecology rating system for wetlands and the Washington Forest Practices Act methods for typing streams) that may pertain to GMA critical areas. However, the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory maps classify wetland areas in accordance with the Cowardin system of identifying and naming wetland types (which is seldom used in Washington State), which is inconsistent with most critical areas ordinances in Washington State; however, many municipalities base their critical areas wetland maps on the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory maps. The USFWS National Wetlands Inventory maps for the subject property and vicinity (Figure 4-3) suggests that PEMA (Palustrine Emergent Temporarily Flooded)wetland areas are present in the southeastern portion of the subject property. The problems with the USFWS maps and wetland identification methodologies lay in the requirements for wetland hydrology, which as discussed later in this section, per State (Chapter 36.70A, RCW, and Chapter 90.58 RCW), Federal (Code 33 CFR 328.3(b)), and Jefferson County municipal code, (18.10.230 - W definitions) requires ". . . a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions". What the USFWS apparently does not realize is that saturated soil conditions mean that the soil is saturated with ground water (as is the case for aquic conditions). Surface water hydrology, such as inundation, ephemeral flows, and even shallow ponding, cannot create saturated soil conditions unless ground water is already at or very close to the ground surface (in some cases the ground water can be"emergent")or unique geologic conditions are present. This is clearly evident in the definition for saturated soil conditions from the Corps of Engineers 1987 Manual (which is still used with the 2010 Regional Manual Supplement),which is(per page A-10): "Saturated soil conditions-A condition in which all easily drained voids(pores between soil particles in the root zone are temporarily or permanently filled with water to the soil surface at pressures greater than atmospheric." 15 Deep water habitats are those areas that are greater than 2 meters in depth. These areas are not considered to be critical areas wetland areas. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report ( 92 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number 921094026 f� ( U6JECT PROPER .1 A • r ,r Z A v v Pe rn . Sfr 8 PEMA E2USN rt. -i .........d... . e... ..W..■ i f." G,o.o Goog1e z a Figure 4-3-USFWS National Wetlands Inventory Map of Subject Property and Vicinity,2010 rn � I 4. 1. 3 Jefferson County Critical Areas Map z Per the Jefferson County Areas Ordinance; JCC Chapter 18.22 Critical Areas Article VII,the County prepared a critical areas database listing all Growth Management Act Critical Areas (and one extra, the SIPZ) believed to exist in the —I County (this is for reference purposes only). This critical areas database has been incorporated into the Jefferson o County GIS system accessible via the Internet as jMAP (http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/idms/mapserver.shtml), which Z provides shaded relief, LiDAR maps, and air photographs of the County with different layers that can be applied to show different critical areas. SNR uses Jefferson County's GIS services jMAP to review what critical areas Jefferson County suggests are present during the initial critical areas data gathering activities as a screening tool and to identify areas that may require more thorough study in the field. The Jefferson County jMAP with the wetland and DNR Stream layers turned on is shown as Figure 4-4 —Jefferson County jMAP-Environmentally Sensitive Areas Wetland Map. This jMAP excerpt suggests that wetland areas are present on the subject property exactly the same as is suggested on the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory map, but does not suggest any streams are present on the subject property. As previously stated, the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory maps do not meet the current Corps of Engineers requirements for identifying and delineating wetland areas nor do they meet the requirements of the state and county codes for critical areas wetland determinations. Additionally, what is curious is that the Jefferson County wetland map suggests that wetland areas bound the shoreline of the subject property which is unusual because this area is in the active wave zone where soils do not form and if soils cannot form, hydric soil conditions cannot exist. Also aquic conditions cannot exist in active marine shorelines where wave action is present because anaerobic conditions cannot develop and if these conditions cannot develop, neither can reducing conditions. August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company " I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA 1.207: + ,Jeffersrgounty Parcel Num.: 9210940 . I MeM010 I q>ava10i Z MN11911 Mtld9I vwnm�2/0 m v1SS I i vaamen v � rr ,��. O 1 (ATIOJCY M ,�. N0N10 I Q MINION 90N99N9 0101001 Mm o 3* 010000 — ti W .-- 0210111017 Mt0•9oM 9177X39 . 977)epp9 fx 9inNnstperr b019 1 ... 10N9N0 CI ftr100010 Tl)90D. 977704.46: .• 1y L P77000111 gflj9 y 97r19W11 CI MN�1 10r5UBJECT PROPERTY Z J91ACfA06+F4 - Of0N51 — 19nromnl ;?9»r9omq' J o9rnmms ■ r R ii -�9TJJ90100-' 1 Z v10■105 I 1e. a ( 92109,10192109,1014.<CC v00001 CNOa 92NMg$1 aN9tlN `T ONN+_M N Z MN9NN ( MMOrmw 6 M10910» 1121010011 1 9 0 11210113101 1121011.10111 mom= MOWN F991010 CMOS 12108017 'I MOa9vlr Q M90010 amass I I M10+m1 / MN/1M1 MN91011 *MOM - M11.N9x 910100 IL. ' M1e90rz I �I e+M1Mr I MN--- Z —___+___— 1 I M1910ms . , ,.�.M+aOa - ; Y.I 12101140311 >LMO M+ep9n9MwmNF i O�MIDtIOm ;i 1 I O 99aeO99 T I i M109NN. 961!00000 M'010001M10000M10010N0NW10 M,. • / 9121';'164'1 901'-00 1"4.321 1 - •• o / -r-M1rmz M91vea 4 . 9!10110'\ MIOMM9 MN9M11 ,%,. J L' Rf10001$ x109011 H W �. ..._ ,0999 NINON. V ,, FROM JEFFERSON COUNTY GIS.?^t1 Figure 4-4—Jefferson County Critical Areas Map Showing Wetlands and Streams,Jefferson County GIS,2011 It should also be noted that since March 14, 2011 Washington State Code requirements for wetland manuals were changed, per the following e-mail: From: ECY RE Wetlands Information [mailto:wetlandsinformation @ECY.WA.GOV] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 5:18 PM To: WETLANDS- INFORMATION@LISTSERV.WA.GOV Subject:Amendment to state rules changes the wetland delineation manual Amendment to state rules changes the wetland delineation manual August 25,2011 Copynght0 2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 94 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 State laws require that wetlands protected under the Growth Management Act and the rri Shoreline Management Act be delineated using a manual that is developed by Ecology —1 and adopted into rules (RCW 36.70A.175: RCW 90.58.380). The Department of Ecology 1— adopted a wetland delineation manual in 1997(WAC 173-22-080)that was based on the a original 1987 Corps of Engineers manual and subsequent Regulatory Guidance Letters. 0 During the last few years the Army Corps of Engineers has updated and expanded their — delineation manual with regional supplements. To maintain consistency between the state ° and federal delineations of wetlands, Ecology has repealed WAC 173-22-080 (the state z delineation manual) and replaced it with a revision of WAC 173-22-035 that states —1 delineations should be done according to the currently approved federal manual and T, supplements. The changes are effective,today, March 14,2011. — The latest federal delineation manual and its supplements should now be used to a delineate wetlands in the state. —1 You can find the federal delineation manual and its supplements on Ecology's Wetland ° z Delineation web page: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/sea/wetlands/delineation.html. a Please note that the Washington State Code Reviser's Office web pages have not yet z been updated to reflect the rule changes. To see the updated rule language go to: G http://www.ecy.wa.gov/laws-rules/SMA2010/1007.html. o If you have any questions about wetland delineation,contact: ^' r— Tom Hruby, PhD Senior Ecologist Washington State Department of Ecology P.O. Box a 47600 Olympia WA 98504(360)407-7274 ,T, tom.hruby @ecy.wa.gov m 0 The USFWS does not use the required manual. It uses the Cowardin system developed in the late 1970s which is not z BAS and is not used by the Corps of Engineers in jurisdictional wetland determinations and if a wetland were present on the subject property it would be considered to have a significant nexus with the waters of the United States, which means it would be jurisdictional. 4. 1 . 4 Jefferson County Code Jefferson County wetland regulations are located under Chapter 18.22 Critical Areas Article VII. Jefferson County Code(18.10.230-W definitions)contains the following definition of a wetland: "Wetland" means an area that is inundated or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances does support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from nonwetland sites, including but not limited to irrigation and drainage ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities,excepting those wetlands created for mitigation purposes. Additionally the definition that is found in Growth Management Act(GMA), RCW 36.70A.030(and in the Manual), is as follows: August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company 95 ( Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson enmity Parcel Number 991094096 (21) "Wetland" or "wetlands" means areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of -- vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, a and similar areas. Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from nonwetland sites, = including, but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater _, treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July 1, 1990, that were ounintentionally created as a result of the construction of a road, street, or highway. Wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from nonwetland areas created to mitigate conversion of wetlands. z This definition is the same definition that is used in the Shoreline Management Act of 1971, as amended (SMA)and is also the definition used in the Growth Management Act of 1990 (as amended); all of which state that wetlands do not c include wetlands created from nonwetland sites, including but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches,grass-lined — swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds and landscape amenities . . .". This a clause in these state "codes" (the SMA and GMA) and the clause in the Jefferson County Code that pertains to - "drainage ditches" prevent SNR from identifying stormwater facilities such as detention ponds (and infiltration ponds), • farm ponds, and drainage ditches (or any MS4 facility) as wetland areas, even if all three wetland indicators are I— determined to be present. o Jefferson County has not applied for or been issued an NPDES Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit for municipal — separate storm sewer system(MS4)discharges to receiving waters. However,the municipal stormwater system is still = regulated by Washington State Code(Chapter 173-201A WAC-Water quality standards for surface waters of the state a of Washington, and Chapter 173-204 WAC - Sediment management standards), and under Section 401 of the Clean F Water Act, and under 40 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter D. Based on field activities and research, the manmade ditches w on the subject property are municipal stormwater drainage ditches, and these are the primary sources of the surface water hydrology in the areas suggested to be wetlands on the county wetland map and USFWS National Wetlands Inventory maps. Also, based on communications with Mr. Kevin Miller and photos provided by Mr. Miller,the ditch on the subject property was excavated after 1990 with a backhoe and the"spoils"from the ditch digging were placed on the west side of this ditch, blocking ephemeral and other diverted municipal storm water flows onto the property from entering this natural drainage area. 4.2 Historical Overview of the Subject Property and Vicinity The history of Marrowstone Island begins with the Native Americans who are believed to have entered the Pacific Northwest approximately 10,000 -12,000 years ago. Some archeologists suggest that modern day Native Americans are descendents of Neolithic hunter gathers that crossed a land or ice bridge between the eastern coast of the Eurasian Continent and the North American Continent. Regardless, American Indians are known to have populated the Puget lowlands for several thousands of years and these Indians met the first explorers into the Puget Sound (Spanish, English, Russian, and others). 4. 2. 1 History of Marrowstone Island The following is excerpted from"Jefferson County--Thumbnail History",from HistoryLink.org: The most thorough exploration of the Puget Sound was conducted in 1792 by Captain George Vancouver(1758-1798) of the British Navy who commanded an expedition into Puget Sound. Captain Vancouver charted and named many natural features:bodies of water, capes, headlands, inlets, and mountain peaks. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 96 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 His predecessor, Captain John Mears, a British mariner searching for the Northwest Passage, named the highest peak on the peninsula, Mount Olympus (7,965 feet), after the mythical home of the Greek gods, on July 4, 1788. Captain " Vancouver followed precedent and wrote the name "Olympic Mountains" on his charts. Eventually, the "Olympic' r designation was extended to the peninsula itself. The American Indians that Captain Vancouver met were the Coast Indians who lived in large communal longhouses, subsisting on fish, shellfish, and wild game as well as roots and berries. With the exception of periodic wars with other o Coast Indian tribes, life was relatively quiet for many centuries. In the late 1700s and early 1800s the Indian population rn was decimated by disease transmitted through contact with white explorers. In some areas diphtheria, smallpox, and z measles killed 90 percent of the Indians. — By the time white settlers arrived some local tribes had populations of only a few hundred and were so depleted they n could not effectively resist the intruders. In the mid-nineteenth century, Indian tribes located in what is now Jefferson County, included the Chem-a-kum (or Chimacum), Hoh (a subset of the Quileute), S'Klallam (or Clallam), Quinault, — 0 Snohomish, and Twana (or Quilcene). By signing of the Point No Point Treaty and the Quinault River Treaty in 1855, local Indian tribes ceded their lands and waters to the United States, reserving the right to continue fishing, hunting, a and gathering in the ceded territories.After the treaties were signed, settlement proceeded rapidly. z 0 White settlers came to the north Olympic Peninsula in the mid-1800s but the rugged interior remained unexplored. Like the Indians, the settlers chose town sites along the waterways and were mainly occupied with logging, fishing, and farming. The first permanent American settlement on the peninsula was Port Townsend, founded on April 24, 1851, : when Alfred A. Plummer(1822-1883) and Charles Bachelder selected homesteads and registered the claims with the z surveyor general's office in Olympia. They named the new town after the bay on which it was situated, so named by a Captain Vancouver on May 8, 1792, in honor of the Marquis of Townshend -- the "h"in the original name was later —1 dropped. Port Townsend, on the Quimper Peninsula at the extreme northeastern tip of the Olympic Peninsula, was perfectly situated for sailing ships. At a time when commerce and travel in the Pacific Northwest were almost entirely waterbome,it was the first safe harbor encountered on Puget Sound. Marrowstone is situated approximately three miles southeast of Port Townsend. The island, seven miles long and a half-mile average width, was named by Captain Vancouver on May 8, 1792, who noted in his log that the cliff behind the point was composed mostly of a whitish hardened clay called "marrowstone."Eventually, the name was used for the entire island. The first settlement on Marrowstone Island was founded in September 1892 by Peter Nordby, a Norwegian immigrant. He purchased 187 acres of land from Thomas Hammond, a Port Townsend realtor, and platted the acreage into 10- acre parcels. Nordby called the new town site "Nordland." Ironically, Peter Nordby never lived on Marrowstone Island, but moved to Seattle, where he founded the Nordby Supply Company, a ship chandlery business. Nordland is still the only town on Marrowstone and the general store is the only source of groceries and gasoline. According to the U.S. Census Bureau,in the year 2000 Marrowstone had a total population of 837. In 1896, Congress approved construction of a fortification on 640 acres of land that had been reserved for military purposes on Marrowstone Island in 1866 by Executive Order. Construction began on the fortification in 1897 and was completed in 1899. Named Fort Flagler, in honor of Brigadier General Daniel Webster Flagler(1835-1899), it was the first of three major Coast Artillery forts built to protect Puget Sound. After World War I(1917-1919)the Army used Fort Flagler as a training center until 1953, when it was officially deactivated, Between 1957 and 1962, the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission purchased the 784-acre fort from the federal government for$36,473, for use as a state park. August 25,2011 Copyright 0 2011 SNR Company 97 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA .Jefferson County Parcel Number 921094026 4. 2. 2 History of the Subject Property z o Based on the Jefferson County Assessor's office information provided on the Internet, the subject property was 1— developed with a two bedroom one and a half story, 2,420 square foot residence in 1900. Another single family „, residence was constructed on the subject property(north of the residence constructed in 1900) in 2004. This is a three bedroom,single story, 1,250 square foot residence. The subject property is located near the southeastern tip of Marrowstone Island with approximately 915 feet of shoreline access. As is the case with most of the Puget lowlands, it is presumed that historic clear cut tree harvesting or activities were conducted on the subject property sometime since 1850. Based on personal communications with Mr. Kevin Miller and on photographs provided by Mr. Miller, it is known that tree clearing activities were conducted on the subject property in the early 1990's and that the "saplings" and clearing debris were "composted" in piles in the o northeastern portion of the subject property. It is also apparent that agricultural activities were and are conducted on the subject property, including orchard areas for fruit trees. c.▪ Figure 4-5 shows trees located in the northeastern portion of the subject property and the subsequent photographs L I- (Figures 4-6 and 4-7)show the trees in the process of being removed (photographs from Kevin Miller,2011). Figure 4- 1— 8 shows a similar view of the subject property during the SNR field study on June 6,2011. W • J I- W . • • • r t 510 �,.4t 3y z 2Fr . .,• • ,• � • . ; Figure 4.5—Photograph of Trees on Subject Property in early 1990s(believed to be 1991) August 25,2011 Copyright 02011 SNR Company Welland Mauney Identiand Lficatioynn and ne Rogerson Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 98 Marc Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number 921094026 m• � a —I a o J ate, m 4.0,1 z wN� eLii.yVnW4.p. 'yL .r4 .r.�?Y� 1a -wMti . b n-I ,�:+ "> .-a, r+. sy9r�g?^''"�i`,..v-\ ° •�.` =`."'� t�"a e 3> Z ifM R+> k",•..., 41.• :. y GK Stl A .4� > °z ot #r"•••-• l''''' w „� r r t m- a` a 0• Figure 4.6—Photograph of Trees partly Removed and Stockpiles are Present(believed to be around 1993) a —I O z la• _ rte•..: aty { -.: " r - w f . • • - Figure 4-7-Trees Gone in Later Photograph(believed to be 1993) August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 99 l Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number. 921094026 F w J W _ O t- er i- z 1 Figure 4-8-June 6,2011 Photograph of area where Trees were Removed in 1993 Q r_ In addition to the trees in the northeastern portion of the subject property being removed, the existing drainage ditch u+ was extended to the culvert that now crossed under Disney Road because of an apparent change in the municipal storm sewer system in this area (drainage was apparently diverted to Disney Road). The June 20, 1990 air photograph (Figure 4-9—June 20, 1990 Air Photograph Showing Forested Area and Drainage)shows a forested area in the northeastern portion of the subject property and very different drainage than what the March 13, 2005 air photograph shows(Figure 4-10—March 13,2005 Air Photograph Showing Change in Forested Area and Drainage). • ` .jixttaax OTE DITCH 4 44 i . E a Figure 4-9-June 20,1990 Air Photograph Showing Forested Area and Drainage,Google August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report ( 100 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number: 921094026 ec NOTE TREES GON rn • rn + --I e z Sub ecl P.cCP.ly� Yy DITCH AND DRA , o•e.a.. ac ..a ai. a wAee:Sa AINAGE DIFFEREN R — a • —4 e,o.oGoog1c = Figure 410•March 13,2005 Air Photograph Showing Change in Forested Area and Drainage,Google r- The existing drainage ditch on the subject property was apparently extended during the early 1990s around the same time the forested areas in the northeastern portion of the subject property was removed. This ditch was excavated with a a backhoe (personal communications with Kevin Miller, 2011) on the subject property when Jefferson County —I apparently decided to divert the municipal storm water generated in the southeastern portion of Marrowstone Island o (primarily from roadside ditches)into a roadside ditch on the north side of Disney Road(a private road according to Mr. z Miller)and onto the subject property(personal communications with Kevin Miller,2011), apparently without easements. As previously discussed, as is shown in Figure 4-10, storm water from the roadside ditch that bounds the west side of Baldwin Road (municipal storm water) is also diverted onto the subject property from the west via a culvert under Baldwin Road. This municipal storm water comes from a relatively large drainage area and apparently does provide the primary source of surface water hydrology in the eastern portion of the subject property. The dominant vegetation on the subject property is "pasture grasses" that can be cut for use as silage for dairy cattle and other livestock. The only grass cutting SNR observed during site visits and field studies was on the manmade trails to the beach area,which were apparently mown with a riding lawnmower. The subject property and most of Marrowstone Island would be considered to be rural, with many of the parcels being larger in size. Growth on Marrowstone Island has been limited,at least in part,due to the ground water use restrictions in place since sea water intrusion was identified to be a potential issue with existing water wells(the existing water well on the subject property is believed to have elevated chloride levels, which suggests sea water influence). However, the Jefferson County PUD#1 has brought municipal water supplies to Marrowstone Island, which should allow more development to occur in the Island because a source of water is now available. August 25,2011 Copyright 02011 SNR Company 101 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number 921094026 4.3 Habitats ° Habitat studies were included with the wetland reconnaissance studies conducted on the subject property. The I— following is a description of the aquatic, terrestrial, and avian habitats that were researched from numerous sources, W including the Seattle Audubon Society, the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. WI These studies suggest that there are no threatened, endangered, or sensitive, (TES) species on or in the immediate o vicinity of the subject property as defined by Washington State or Federal regulations. Additionally, no state candidate ° species, no Jefferson County species of local importance, or species proposed for listing, or listed by, the United a States Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS)or National Marine Fisheries Service(NMFS), are shown to be on, or in the z immediate vicinity of, the subject property. Additionally, the subject property and the area in the immediate vicinity of © the subject property were not observed to be, nor are listed as being, a wildlife corridor for these species or other I- migratory or aquatic species. C' Jefferson County Critical Areas Ordinance (Article VI Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas) contains wildlife 'L habitat conservation standards for the maintenance of threatened, endangered, or sensitive species of fish, wildlife z and/or plants,or species of local importance none of which were observed on the subject property; however,due to the W shoreline areas, rural conditions on and in the vicinity, and the presence of forested areas on and in the vicinity of the ° subject property, it is possible that the protected predatory birds may be observed near the subject property and that o protected Puget Sound orcas may also be present offshore. a The subject property is located in the Marrowstone Island/Oak Bay Ecoregion in the northwestern portion of Puget ▪ Sound. ▪ 4. 3. 1 Aquatic Although no amphibian or fish species were observed by SNR during field studies(nor were calls associated with frogs noted), because municipal storm water is diverted onto the subject property and the construction of the drainage ditch on the subject property blocked natural ephemeral flows, it is possible that some amphibian species may be present in the vicinity of this point source stormwater conveyance. Fortunately it is not possible for any fish species to enter this point source conveyance. 4. 3. 2 Terrestrial Prior to the arrival of Euro-American settlers in the nineteenth century,all of westem Washington was forested with the exception of 8.9 percent of the landscape above the alpine timberline and another 1.4 percent of non-forested prairies or wetlands. However,since the arrival of the settlers, much of western Washington has been clear cut tree harvested multiple times, and much of the tree growth seen today is second or third growth that is quite different from the original old growth forests. The second and third growth forests are predominantly Douglas fir and western red cedar forests with big leaf maple or red alder often being the dominant deciduous tree in these conifer forests. However, the pre-European old growth forests were reportedly(by the WSDNR)to be dominantly western hemlock and western red cedar conifer forests with big leaf maple being one of the dominant deciduous trees present. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 102 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 However, the subject property and vicinity are located in the southeastern portion of Marrowstone Island, with most of E this area having been clear cut historically and most of the subject property remains devoid of forested areas. There " are small forested areas in the northwestern and northeastern portions of the subject property and significantly forested r— areas in the vicinity of the subject property with much of this area being limited to larger lot residential development. Both forested areas are at least second growth forests(based on observed tree sizes,most likely,third growth). 4.3.2.1 Terrestrial Wildlife Based on research and observations, it is anticipated that the following species may be present on or in the vicinity of z the subject property: - Coyote(Canis latrans) - Red Squirrel(Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) - House mouse(Mus musculus) - Deer Mouse(Peromyscus maniculatus) - Black-tailed deer(Odocoileus hemionus columbianus) - Raccoon(Procyon lotor) 00 - Virginia opossum(Didelphis virginianus) - Striped skunk(Mephitis mephitis) rn - - Northwestern garter snake(Thamnophis ordinoides) m 4. 3. 3 Avian 1 No active bird nests were observed on the site(most of the site is cleared) at the time field studies were conducted nor o were priority habitats or priority species observed during the field studies. Gulls (Larus spp.) were observed during z field studies. The Seattle Audubon suggests that Black Tumstone, Surfbird, and the occasional Rock Sandpiper may be found in the vicinity of the subject property and that the Harlequin Duck, Long-tailed Duck(in the winter), all three species of loons, Horned and Red-necked Grebes, and a variety of alcids are common in the Sound areas around the Island. SNR field studies and research suggest that there are no TES, state threatened, state endangered, state sensitive, state candidate, species of local importance, or species proposed for listing by the USFWS or NMFS on or in the immediate vicinity of the subject property (although bald eagles are known to nest in the Oakbay/Marrowstone Island ecoregion). Additionally, research suggests that the subject property and the area in the immediate vicinity are not listed as being a wildlife corridor for these species or other migratory species. The species that have been observed on the subject property16 and are reported to be present in this portion of the Puget lowlands are species that have adapted to living in an urban to rural environment. 4.3.3.1 Avian Wildlife Based on research and on observations, it is anticipated that the following species may be present on or in the vicinity of the subject property: - Killdeer(Charadrius vociferus) - Ring-billed Gull(Larus delawarensis) - Anna's Hummingbird (Calypte anna) 16 Either directly observed or identified by tracks,scat,nests,or calls. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 103 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Numher 921094026 - Northern Flicker(Colaptes auratus) - Steller's Jay(Cyanocitta Stelleri) - Northwestern Crow(Corvus caurinus) - Black-capped Chickadee(Poecile atricapillus) - Chestnut-backed Chickadee(Poecile rufescens) J - Bushtit(Psaltriparus minimus) - Red-breasted Nuthatch (Sitta Canadensis) - Winter Wren (Troglodytes troglodytes) - Golden-crowned Kinglet(Regulus satrapa) ° - American Robin (Turdus migratorius) - Spotted Towhee(Pipilo maculates) `—' - Song Sparrow(Melospiza melodia) LL - White-crowned Sparrow(Zonotrichia leucophrys) - Dark-eyed Junco(Junco hyemalis) ° - Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) - House Sparrow(Passer domesticus) • 4. 3. 4 TES, PHS, SOC, and State Heritage W Based on SNR's research and observations made on and in the vicinity of the subject property, there are no known(or observed) occurrences of any TES, Priority Habitats and Species (PHS), or Species of Concern (SOC) on or in the immediate vicinity of the subject property (WDFW, 2007) nor are there any state heritage sites (Washington Heritage Register, http:/lwww.dahp.wa.gov/)located on or in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. 4.4 Wetland Field Studies Initial field reconnaissance activities were conducted on the subject property on March 15, 2011 by an SNR Company principal hydrogeologist, licensed in the state of Washington. Comprehensive wetland field studies were conducted on and in the vicinity of the subject property on June 6, 2011. These studies were conducted by an SNR company principal geologist and principal licensed hydrogeologist. The USACE Regional Manual, 2010 for comprehensive wetland studies was used for guidance and the State Manual was used as a reference. The field studies followed pre-established transects to ensure adequate area coverage and coverage of areas that required more detailed study based on research that included the review of remote sensing data and other transects were added in the field as necessary. ICI II August 25,2011 Copyright 02011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report 104 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number. 921094026 Sample plot soil sampling was conducted using an Oakfield Model C soil sample, a shovel, an Estwing GeoPick, a 10x hand lens, and Munsell® Soil Color charts. Sample plot locations were recorded using a Magellan Mobile Mapper r Professional, with post processing data collection turned on. Soil samples were described in the field, including I- general color17, using geologic and soil descriptions and were collected in Ziplock sample collection bags for viewing in the field periodically to see if color changes occurred or redoximorphic features appeared within the first hour of ° collection. Samples were checked periodically for notable changes. In addition to sample plot soil sampling activities, — geologic test pits were also hand excavated using an Estwing GeoPick, a shovel, and an Oakfield Model C soil ° m sampler. Additionally, the Estwing GeoPick was used on the bluff areas where geologic studies were conducted to z study the stratigraphy,sedimentology,depositional environment, and hydrogeology of the subject property. T Soils that were not moist18(either too wet or too dry)were brought back to SNR's lab for further study and to adjust the - soil moisture to moist conditions following ASTM D 4643 methods for drying (no organic soils were observed in any s sample plot or test pit). Once the soils were dry, moisture in the form of distilled water is added to obtain 10% water content by weight. The soil color is then determined using the Munsell®Soil Color charts. The soils are also observed under magnification and were described using NRCS soils methods described in the following manuals: - Field Book for Describing and Sampling Soils,Version 2.0, National Soil Survey Center, Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, September 2002 - Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil Taxonomy,A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting p Soil Surveys,2nd ed. USDA-National Resources Conversation Service,Washington, DC m I- - United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2010. Field Indicators z of Hydric Soils in the United States,Version 7.0. G.W. Hurt and L.M. Vasilas(eds.). USDA,NRCS, in r„ cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils 1 - Soil Survey Staff.2010. Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 11th ed. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation - Service,Washington, DC Vegetation was identified based on general knowledge of vegetation that is typically found in the Puget lowlands; however, vegetation that is questionable or unknown is verified using several references that are listed in the references section of this text. Vegetation characteristics in Region 9 (the Department of Agriculture Region that includes the Puget lowlands), were verified as necessary using the USDA The PLANTS Database at http://plants.usda.aovl. Hydrology and hydrogeology studies and interpretations were conducted by SNR's licensed hydrogeologist and were based on research and field studies, as discussed in previous sections of this report. A summary of each day of field studies is summarized below. The observations made at each sample plot are provided on the Wetland Identification and Delineation Forms which are presented in Attachment B of this report. 4. 4. 1 March 15, 2011 Site Reconnaissance Activities Site reconnaissance activities were conducted on March 15, 2011 and began at approximately 11 AM. The weather was overcast with rain; the temperature was approximately 40 degrees Fahrenheit. The field activities included vegetation and hydrology observations using a LiDAR based shaded relief topographic map as a base map and a Jefferson County GIS topographic map as a reference. It began raining during the field activities and had rained for 8 out of the 10 days prior to the field activities being conducted (Figure 4-11 -Weather for Marrowstone Island,WA from Weather Underground March 5-15,2011). 17 If the soils are moist when collected in the field,the Munsell colors are described based on comparisons with the Munsell Color charts using available daylight ,a The manuals require the color be recorded for moist soils,with the new NTCHS and Corps manuals requiring that the samples moisture be adjusted moist prior to determining the Munsell color. If the soil is moist in the field,SNR will document the Munsell color observed in the field. August25,2011 Copyright 0 2011 SNR Company 105 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA lefferson County Parral Mahe-. 921094026 Observations 2091 Temp CF) Precp.,nt Hem. Mar him avg low hop avg low high an bw high an low MO avg low high avg high Sum ......... Q 5 46 42 39 39 37 34 89 8t 63 30 20 3014 30 06 10 10 10 13 1 23 000 W z 6 45 n 31 37 35 33 93 84 65 3013 30.05 2993 10 10 5 7 3 - 002 Ran 7 46 40 35 36 32 26 93 70 49 2995 2993 2990 t0 8 2 9 2 - 000 J IA.r 8 48 42 31 43 37 32 93 82 71 3012 2994 2978 10 1 2 12 7 18 005 Ram Q 9 53 48 42 46 42 36 90 01 66 3004 2992 2977 10 8 3 29 13 38 078 Ran tO 52 46 41 44 39 35 90 16 59 3010 2976 2981 10 I 5 37 11 48 057 Ran -L II 48 44 39 39 35 31 87 74 54 3014 3009 3000 10 10 4 17 11 26 003 Ran Q 12 46 44 42 41 39 36 09 83 73 3003 2995 2988 10 9 3 21 6 24 046 Ran Z 83 48 45 42 45 47 35 90 84 71 2997 2974 2955 10 8 2 24 10 31 OW Ran 0 84 51 45 42 43 40 37 89 80 63 3011 2998 2960 10 8 4 32 19 39 082 Ran 15 53 48 42 45 41 38 93 81 66 2983 2965 2958 10 0 2 24 14 34 062 Ran.TlOUnaerstonn Coma OeWate8 fie u."" Figure 4-11 -Weather for Marrowstone Island,WA from Weather Underground--March 5—15,2011 t-- Z Minor ponding and ephemeral surface water flow was observed in the western portion of the subject property, with c water depths averaging 1-2 inches. Moderate point source stormwater flow was observed in the roadside ditch system — that drains onto the subject property via two culverts, one crossing Disney Road and one crossing Baldwin Road. e Some of the storm water in the roadside ditch on north side of Disney Road enters the"Young" property and flows into a a recently excavated pond. This pond and the remaining flow in the northern roadside ditch drain to the culvert that —' crosses beneath Disney Road and discharges into the manmade point source stormwater drainage ditch on the W subject property as shown in Figure 4-12. Most of the surface water hydrology was observed to be in the eastern portion of the subject property and is primarily derived from the point source storm water that is diverted onto the subject property from the west and north. This causes minor ponding derived from stormwater flow from the west and ephemeral drainage from the west being blocked by stockpiled soils from the point source drainage ditch excavation being placed on the west side of the drainage ditch. There are three drainage ditches that have been excavated relatively perpendicular to the point source drainage ditch, 9 YP P P 9 apparently to reduce ponding that occurs due to the blockage of natural ephemeral surface water flow due to the excavation of the point source stormwater drainage ditch and the presence of buried "brush and tree debris" in "compost"piles on the subject property. This eastern portion of the subject property has virtually no trees and minimal shrub vegetation, primarily Himalayan blackberries (Rubus discolor) and other Rubus species; however, Rosa nutkana(Nootka rose) is also observed. The dominant vegetation in the eastern portion of the subject property is non-native grasses, including reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea), but the grasses are mostly those that would be identified and "planted pasture grasses", such as Festuca, Agrostis, Lolium, Phleum pretense, and Poa species as shown in Figure 4-13. Other seasonal herbaceous plant species observed included Carex sp., and Juncus sp. (it was early in the growing season which limited more accurate species determinations). The soils observed on the subject property are generally sandy loams, with occasional pebbles and gravels (in the sample plots);the soils observed on the bluff face were more gravelly. All of the soils observed on the subject property are believed to be fluvial deltaic deposits, possibly Sumas Stade or Vashon Stade age recessional outwash deposits. No ground water was observed during this site reconnaissance,even on the bluff faces along the shoreline. August 25,2011 Copyright@ 2011 SNR Company Wetland IdentTicabon and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 106 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 1 , r .e. - ,,, 4: '-' , :.Y. {$ p. 7-4 �4 Rt i , I O a . „.40, , l 1 . ti. +r �.,.._.. _' L I m 1 1 0 z a z v O m m Figure 4-12-Photograph Looking Southeast from Disney Road on March 15,2011 z m a -I 0 z may: Figure 4-13-Photograph Lookin East from southeast corner of Single Story Residence built in 2 4 9 Looking 9 rY 00 on March 15,2011 August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 107 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Cnunty Parcel Numher. 921094026 In general all of the vegetation that was observed was all facultative, ranging from FACW - FACU, with no obligate species observed. Based on the soil type observed in hand excavated geologic test pits and based on observations of - the bluff along the shoreline, saturated soil conditions cannot be present because no near surface ground water was a observed (nor was ground water observed to be within 15 feet of the ground surface)even though this reconnaissance W was conducted during the early growing season during a year with higher than normal rainfall. 4. 4. 2 June 6, 2011 Field Activities Field studies began at approximately 10:30 AM. The weather was partly sunny and the temperature was approximately 70 degrees Fahrenheit. No rain showers had occurred since June 3 and there were only 4 out of 10 at days of rainfall occurring before the field activities were conducted (Figure 4-14-Weather for Marrowstone Island, WA from Weather Underground-May 28-June 6,2011). Observations a o 2911 Temp.(9) Dew Pont i'f) humidity,%. Sea Level Press...1r Vrsipkty,■un•, Windi,lpn, Poo*.(o) hotel. r.� May high avq low high av9 Mw hgh avg tow high avg low high avg low nigh avg high sum 25 57 52 46 43 42 40 87 74 55 2999 2997 2995 10 10 10 12 7 17 000 Z 29 61 56 50 49 44 41 56 89 57 2997 2995 2992 10 IS 10 19 4 - 000 11.1 30 60 55 50 46 43 41 87 70 SI 2996 29 92 29 89 10 10 10 10 5 - 3 00 o II tit 54 48 54 47 42 57 76 60 2998 2994 2991 10 10 10 8 5 - 003 Ran 801, Tamp('F) Cow Point IT) Numddy)%■ Sea Level Press.(m, VisiSiNy(mpml Wind 11ron, p1.6,9.to) Fvent• Jun ngh avg low I16M avg low high avg IOW ngh avg tow high avg low high avg high sum a 1 57 4 50 49 47 15 89 82 67 3000 2998 29% 10 70 7 8 4 - 004 Ran 2 59 54 50 51 48 43 93 83 59 30.05 30.00 1995 10 9 5 9 4 • 010 Ran. 3 64 56 48 49 46 44 93 73 52 3013 30 09 30 05 10 10 5 13 5 20 0 04 Ran. W 4 71 60 55 52 49 46 93 69 49 30 13 30(15 29 96 10 10 9 10 5 18 000 5 73 64 54 51 49 46 80 59 42 29 99 29 95 29 90 10 10 11) 7 4 . 000 70 62 54 53 SI 48 90 71 51 29.95 29 91 29 89 10 10 9 18 5 21 000 5Om1\Minted He Figure 4-14-Weather for Marrowstone Island,WA from Weather Underground-May 28-June 6,2011 An SNR Company licensed hydrogeologist (principal hydrogeologist) and principal licensed geologist conducted field studies following pre-established transects to ensure all potential wetland areas and other areas with potential critical areas were studied. Additional transects were conducted based on observations made in the field. GPS readings were taken of surveyed benchmarks for accuracy verification. All features noted in the field and all sample plots were located using this GPS unit with post processing turned on. Hand excavated geologic test pits were conducted in addition to basic sample plots. These studies primarily focused on the eastern portion of the subject property because remote sensing data and all research conducted by SNR suggested that wetland conditions should not exist in the western portion of the subject property nor should other critical areas. However, to verify this, reconnaissance activities were also conducted in the western portion of the subject property. Field studies also included the reconnaissance and GPS locating of all observed sources of surface water flow, including point source roadside ditches, culverts, and other point source conveyances,up to one mile from the subject property. August 25.2011 Copyright m 2011 SNR Company Wetland Identiricabon and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 108 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number. 921094026 The June 6, 2011 field studies were more extensive and comprehensive than those conducted on March 15, 2011. These field studies covered the subject property up to 200 feet west of the western boundary of the subject property, m the entire eastern shoreline area with comprehensive geologic studies being conducted on the bluff faces, the entire r-- property line along Disney Road, and the entire western property line. These studies included a reconnaissance of a z approximately one mile north on East Marrowstone Road and 600 feet west on Robbins Road (Figure 4-15–Transect o Map for Studies Conducted on and in the immediate vicinity of the Subject Property, and Figure 4-16–Transect Map — for Studies Conducted in the Vicinity of the Subject Property). ° m z a a dl .11 ,t>.,' i y D } D _{ PREDETERMINED TRANSECT - rn r I- TRAN$ECT CHOSEN IN FIELD E Z m 4 Of --I o.,aGoogle- »,o z Figure 4.15-Transect Map for Studies Conducted on and in the Immediate Vicinity of the Subject Property on June 6,2011 T....* PREDETERMINED TRANSECT �+'*. - t', TRANSECT CHOSEN IN FIELD \ { rjiA. ■ 6 -t ...k' r.r' L s' - . 4 ,.. Si - 4 n + \� s'9a'a.wn 0.0N EV.P9?59 _ C e,0.0 V Oogl` Figure 4-16-Transect Map for Studies Conducted in the Vicinity of the Subject Property on June 6,2011 August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 109 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number 921094025 SNR limited sample plots to areas where the Jefferson County wetland map and the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory map suggested wetland areas may be present and where there was evidence of surface water ponding and vegetation that the Corps of Engineers suggests is indicative that wetland vegetation was present. W The number of sample plots was limited because the bluff area along the entire eastern property line is fully exposed up to 15 feet above the shoreline. This bluff face is the lowest topographic area on the subject property and provides W detailed cross sectional data on the stratigraphy, sedimentology, and the subsurface hydrology that will be present p beneath the subject property. C3 Most of SNR's studies were focused on the bluff faces because these provide the most information on the subsurface ▪ geology and hydrology on the subject property.Y• Surprisingly, even though the recessional outwash deposits overlay glacial till deposits, there is no evidence of any unsaturated zone preferential flow and no evidence of any perched o ground water being present anywhere on the exposed bluff faces(Figure 4-17-Bluff Face in the Southeastern Portion t— of the Subject Property). a C., U- Z y lir.a cc W fji- J Jd Figure 4-17-Photograph of Bluff Face in the Southeastern Portion of the Subject Property on June 6,2011 The glacial till deposits beneath the recessional outwash sands and gravelly sands are believed to be lodgment till deposits; however, these glacial till deposits do contain rounded "concretion" like masses up to 30 inches in diameter. Observations with a 10x hand lens suggest that these masses are almost pure volcanic glass and based on observations of the bluff face,these masses"dissolve" in the bluff face creating "solution"cavities that eventually lead to slope instability and mass wasting when the cavities collapse(Figure 4-18). The recessional outwash deposits thin to the north and were only about one foot deep where the stairway from Disney Road enters onto the beach area (north of the northeastern corner of the subject property). Also, based on observations of the beach area, the beach appears to be composed of well indurated clayey silt(Figure 4-19)and this deposit apparently underlies the glacial till, but no ground water seeps or flows were observed at this sharp contact. August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 110 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 m t -1 - r a z 0 0 m%11, ^ Loon t. a` dW a e • — x. c o z 2t 4 rw j z r -- -. :,ti Figure 4-18-Photograph of Solution Cavity Collapse Induced Mass Wasting Near the Disney Road Stairway to the Beach z on June 6,2011 ^' a o rte. • sr C ' '` •+"s. 'w tep: .Y 1 ^ ,, ,,}},,r t �, k ; -4 4 a� .$, *,:. F3r T�.`F �" -74$ 1 —P w 4C ' • i ". 't: {'msYs h . . y.'•,, f' � � x, , '. 4.-.% 5 yx 4,',:7-q' ''i r 1, "y i," Y - s w -�"ia TY.f∎FA . ' ""{ ; s ..i. ,a i ,:,2. < u r= 3. " p °. „ ` tie ', „ . 25 ., c, 4. x y. .a.-1,,,:..;,. ..11.,,,,,,,...44.t,,,,. y ,+„'S -4,,w''r't.-i.l`� 7., ., s<•} rr 7.`,,,-- 2,. r.�a° x+p�, , t Figure 4-19-Photograph of Clayey Silt on Beach Area on June 6,2011 August 25,2011 Copyright 02011 SNR Company 111 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number 921094026 Wetland field studies began in the northeastern area where the wetland maps suggest wetland areas may be present, o with all sample plots being conducted in the areas with the most prevalent"wetland vegetation"and the most evidence 1 F of surface water ponding. At least one sample plot was conducted in a lateral drainage ditch in the southeastern ' portion of the area suggested to be wetlands on the wetland maps. The sample plot locations are shown on the Site z Map in Attachment A of this report. W The soils are relatively shallow on the subject property and generally are not deeper than 24 inches, although they did CI extend to 30 inches deep in the southern sample plots. In general the soils were a well sorted,sandy loam with a dark e brown (moist) "A" soil horizon that ranged from 12 inches- 18 inches deep. The "B" soil horizon has a sharp clear = contact and is generally a light grayish brown (moist) sandy loam (with occasional pebbles and gravels) that is a generally 12 inches-16 inches thick(ranging from 24 inches-30 inches deep). Where present, the "C"soil horizon c has a sharp contact with the "B" soil horizon and is a light brown (moist) gravelly, sandy loam and ranges between 2 - inches-5 inches thick. Figure 4-20 is of Sample Plot 2(SP2) in the northeastern portion of the subject property near .az the shrub and tree debris"compost mound". :# 1 , 0 ' `,-,.39. r''.t * . . ,•=i.Ar ' ,1. ,T J -,.-4._;:.„,:: i \ al kw,I— t 'de °:_'....-1" .l r .:ff� v �, <a. :.. A r a S. A i. of.. S, '. Y'R �y_a,y,rA''i r. ..y, ...y le.-;:;5„...- x4 I,ftl�is 4,4 �' 1 a 1#. r. Y t, +'�} ',- -.r ; Y '4' ,. 1 if Alp, i ` '''` y ar -mot f — ' .'',Aelq� i ' r S ys i � �s ^ ) l ' ,it I� '.r { M _ .. (0,•y f f 1 r i,�,. i ' ,1' ..jl '' , , . '' ' --4 "- ,,ar:R'f-'T ,. >Y / ��qt7 ,t !!! '1 1 r 3t. J' !r �'ev '- fir"'?f. 4 Figure 4.20-Photograph of Sample Plot 2 in the Northeastern portion of the Subject Property near the Shrub and Tree Debris"Compost Mound"on June 6,2011 There was no standing water on the subject property except in the manmade point source drainage ditch, most likely remnants from the four day rain event that ended on June 3, 2011. None of the soils encountered were wet except where minor unsaturated zone flow was encountered in the deeper test pits at the contact with the underlying more cohesive sands,at least 24 inches below the ground surface. There was no evidence that ground water has ever been present within 30 inches of the ground surface and based on observations of the bluff faces along the eastern property line there is no evidence that ground water has been within 15 feet of the ground surface. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report 112 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nord land,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number 921094026 The majority of the vegetation observed in the eastern portion of the subject property is facultative (FAC), with the dominant vegetation being grasses, primarily non-native "pasture"grasses (Figure 4-21 —Vegetation in the Vicinity of Ti SP4). In areas where minor ponding occurs,some Carex and Juncus species are observed. The dominant shrubs are r— Rosa and Rubus species;with Rosa nutkana and Rubus discolor being the most prevalent. m -4 i T . n T r m x. Z Figure 4-21—Photograph of Vegetation in the Vicinity of Sample Plot 4 on June 6,2011 4.4.2.1 Vegetation The vegetation observed on the subject property vanes significantly from the forested areas in the northwestern and northeastern portions of the subject property and the"prairie like"clear cut"grassland"that covers most of the eastern portion of the subject property. The northwestern forested area has vegetation commonly found in upland forests, including the conifers and hardwoods found throughout the Puget lowlands, such as western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), red alder (Alnus rubra), an occasional big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), and western red cedar (Thuja plicate) were observed. Salal (Gaultheria shallop) and western sword fern(Polystichum munitum)were the dominant understory vegetation observed during field activities. As previously discussed the eastern portion of the subject property has some shrubs, but most of these are either Rubus or Rosa species. Surprisingly, reed canarygrass is not the dominant grass throughout this area, with other species,such as Festuca,Poa,and Lolium species often being the dominant grass species. A partial listing of the vegetation observed on the subject property during the site reconnaissance and other field activities is provided in Table 4-1 below. This list is not suggested to be complete listing of every plant species that is present on the subject property nor are the species listed below observed in every portion of the subject property or in each sample plot. For a listing of the vegetation observed in each sample plot please refer to the wetland identification and delineation forms in Attachment B of this document. Table 4-1 Partial Listing of Vegetation Observed on and in the Vicinity of the Subject Property August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 113 Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA efersnn Cm I •. .:. 1 u v • 971094076 Common Name Scientific Name Current Indicator Status 0 Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii FACU r++ Red Alder Alnus rubra FAC Western red cedar Thuja plicate FAC CI Western Hemlock Tsuga heterophylla FACU 0 Big Leaf Maple Acer macrophyllum FACU ct Salal Gauttheria shallon FACU 0 Evergreen blackberry Rubus laciniatus FACU Himalayan blackberry Rubusamreniacus FACU U- F Trailing Blackberry Rubus ursinus FACU "r Western Sword Fern Polystichum munitum FACU 0 Bracken Fern Ptendium aqul inum FACU Sedge Carex sp. OBL-FACU Creeping buttercup Ranculus repens FACW W Tall buttercup Ranunculus eons FACW Reed Canarygrass Phalans arundinacea FACW Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis FAC Nootka Rose Rosa nutkane FAC Vine maple Acer circinatum FAC Holly Ilex aquifolium FACU Oregon Grape Mahonia nervosa FACU Indian Plum Oemlena cerasiformis FACU Thimbleberry Rubus parviflonrs FAC Red huckleberry Vaccinium parvifolium FACU Willow species Salix sp. FACW—FAC Canada thistle Cirsium arense FACU Curley dock Rumex crispus FAC August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report l 114 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 Red clover Trifolium pretense FACU m White clover Trifolium repens FAC Aster species Aster(sp). FACW—FAC Common camas Camassia quamash FACW Rush Juncus sp. FACW—FACU z Bentgrass Agrostis sp. FAC - T Orchardgrass Dactylis gomerata FACU Fescue Festuca sp. FAC—FACU - Ryegrass Lolium sp. FACU Reed canarygrass Phalaris arundinacea FACW z Common timothy Phleum pretense FAC l7 T Bluegrass Poa sp. FACW—FACU Common horsetail Equisetum arvense FAC z m 4.4.2.2 Soils -� As previously discussed,the geologic maps suggest that the deposits on the subject property are glacial till or outwash deposits(advance or recessional) that are Quaternary age(which can be Vashon or Sumas Stade deposits). The soil survey suggests San Juan soils may be present; however,the deposits SNR observed on the subject property appear to have been deposited by water, possibly recessional outwash fluvial deltaic deposition. In most cases the mineral soil was covered with a thin organic layer of grass derived litter,duff,and humus. In general what SNR observed was an organic layer (1 - 3 inches) overlying a mineral soil that has a high mafic (basalt — andesite)content,with a relatively thin"A"horizon (10—12 inches)a moderate"B"soil horizon of approximately 10-12 inches, and a relatively thin "C" soil horizon of generally less than 8 inches in thickness, were present. These soils were underlain by recessional outwash and glacial till parent materials. None of the soils observed exhibited hydric soil characteristics. The following is a generalized soil profile description of the soils observed on the subject property (this does not include a description of the leaf litter,duff, and humus,or the soils observed on the bluff faces): Depth Munsell® Soil Horizon79 Description Color 0-12" 10YR 3/3 A Dark brown, moist,sandy loam 12"—24" 10YR 6/2 B Light brownish gray, moist, sandy loam (occasional pebbles and gravels) 19 No E soil horizons were observed in any hand dug geologic test pits,sample plots. August25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 115 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number 921094 2_ 24"—30" 10YR 5/3 C Grayish brown, moist,gravelly, sandy loam 30"—60" 10YR 6/3 N/A Light brown, silty, gravelly, cobbly sand (glacial till) parent cc material W z None of the soils observed were altered or otherwise exhibited the characteristics of hydric soils. u+ 4.4.2.3 Hydrology c As previously discussed, wetland hydrology is that of saturated soils and by definition, this is ground water hydrology z that is present in the root zone long enough to require plants to develop adaptations for living in saturated soil conditions that are anaerobic. If this results in aquic conditions, the soils will also be reducing. Based on SNR's research and field studies,there is no evidence of wetland hydrology being present anywhere on the subject property. - Minor unsaturated zone flows were observed in several of the test pits in the eastern portion of the subject property, a with several days of rain ending three days before the field studies were conducted. Based on the topography and the LL characteristics of the soils and parent materials,these unsaturated zone flows are believed to be preferential flows. All - of the field activities were conducted during the"growing season". The entire bluff face was studied in the field and is z hydraulically downgradient of the entire subject property with no seeps being observed nor was there any evidence o that seeps occur during the rainy season (there was no evidence of unsaturated zone preferential flow either). Minor ephemeral surface water ponding does occur on the subject property; however, this surface water is limited in z the area in the eastern portion of the subject property where soils removed from a manmade drainage ditch were J placed on the western side of this ditch, blocking natural ephemeral flow (and storm water diverted onto the subject W property from the west)from draining to the natural ephemeral drainage area on the subject property(where the ditch was excavated). This surface water apparently infiltrates to ground water or becomes unsaturated zone flows at depth, draining to the east, southeast. The natural ephemeral surface water drainage is to the southeast, which is the same as the manmade ditch that follows the low point of this natural ephemeral drainage system. The primary source of surface water flow on the subject property is in the manmade ditch that receives point source municipal storm water derived from the Jefferson County roadside ditches bounding Robbins Road and East Marrowstone Road. The surface deposits observed in the field are anticipated to have moderate to high hydraulic transmissivity; however, because most of the eastern portion of the subject property is cleared and has the characteristics of a "meadow", most of the vegetation is seasonal, which means that evapotranspiration will be low during the rainy season. This can lead to ephemeral surface water flows during significant storm events. This can cause ponding where the ephemeral drainage area to the east is blocked by stockpiled soil from the excavation of the manmade drainage ditch. As previously discussed, virtually all of the minor ponding SNR observed on this site is due to human activities that have been conducted on the subject property. None of this ponding is due to near surface ground water or impermeable soils. This minor ponding does not meet the criteria for wetland hydrology per the Code definition for a wetland,which require that the soils be saturated, These soils do not have near surface ground water, these soils will infiltrate relatively rapidly,and they drain relatively rapidly in the form of preferential flows at depth and to ground water which, based on well logs in this area is located at least 42 feet below the ground surface. August 25,2011 Copyright 0 2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 116 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 5 LIMITATIONS The field studies and research conducted for this Study have been conducted in general accordance standard —I accepted practices for conducting critical areas studies and for the identification of potential wetland areas, and in a accordance with the general requirements set forth by the Washington State Geologist Licensing Board per WAC 308- o 15-020— 140, and Chapter 18-220 RCW, and the Washington State Growth Management Act of 1990 as amended — z Chapter 36.70A RCW, and the Clean Water Act - Title 33 Chapter 26 Section 404 of the CFR, and Title 18.22 r" Jefferson County Code for Critical Areas. This type of investigation is undertaken with the calculated risk that the presence, full nature, and extent of potential wetland areas and other critical areas may not be revealed by visual observation, field studies, and research alone. Although thorough site reconnaissance activities were conducted and field studies performed in accordance using standard accepted procedures and employing a professional standard of care, no warranty is given; either expressed or implied that potential unobservable geologic, hydrogeologic,wetland conditions,or other critical areas conditions are not present on the site. Therefore, the data obtained are clear and accurate only to the degree implied by the sources and methods used. The findings presented in this report were based upon field observations and the review of available, reasonably ascertainable data and references. SNR's observations describe only the conditions present at the time of this investigation. The data reviewed and observations made are limited to accessible areas and currently available records searched. SNR cannot guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the files, maps, and records reviewed. Additionally, in evaluating the property, SNR has relied in good faith upon representations and information provided by others with respect to present operations and existing property conditions, and the historic uses of the property. It must also be understood that changing circumstances in the property use, proposed property use, subject site zoning, and changes on the other nearby properties can alter the validity of SNR's conclusions and information contained in this report. Therefore,the data obtained are clear and accurate only to the degree implied by the sources and methods used, and should be considered reliable for a period no longer than one year from the date of report submission. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the client noted on the cover page and shall be subject to the terms and conditions in the applicable service agreement between the client and SNR. Any third party use of this report, including use by the client's lender, shall also be subject to the terms and conditions in the contract between the client and SNR governing the work. The unauthorized use of, reliance on, or release of the information contained in this report without the expressed written consent of SNR is strictly prohibited and will be without risk or liability to SNR. Conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on the evaluation of information made available during the course of this Study. It is not warranted that such data cannot be superseded by future geologic, environmental,ecologic, legal,geotechnical, hydrologic,or technical developments. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 117 Wetland Identification and Delineation and tream Reconnaissance'wort Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number: 921094026 C 4C 6 FINDINGS c SNR's research and field studies conducted on and in the vicinity of the subject property strongly suggests that there are no wetland areas present on or in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. Although there are minor areas �i where ephemeral surface water ponding does occur, primarily due to the excavation of a stormwater drainage ditch on the subject property to handle municipal point source storm water diverted onto the subject property. Saturated soil conditions were not identified to be present in any sample plot nor is this likely, based on the hydrology observed on the bluff faces that are downgradient of the entire subject property; because no ground water was observed as seeps anywhere along the bluffs or in any of the test pits nor did the soils observed in any test pits exhibit hydric soil characteristics. Except for the Jefferson County critical areas map (which is exactly the same as the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory maps) and the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory maps, none of the references reviewed by SNR, including the WDFW SalmonScape maps, geologic maps, well logs, and recent and historic USGS topographic maps suggest that potential wetlands or streams are present on the subject property. The subject property does have"manmade"surface water issues. It receives surface water from at least two "off-site" sources from the Jefferson County municipal separate storm sewer system (from the north and west). To address the municipal storm water diverted onto the subject property from the culvert under Disney Road (which, according to Kevin Miller, Disney Road is a private road), a drainage ditch was excavated in the early 1990s apparently by the property owners. However, instead of placing the removed soils on the down slope side of this ditch, the backhoe operator placed them on the upslope side of the ditch, preventing natural ephemeral drainage(and municipal storm water diverted onto the subject property from the west)from reaching the low point in this ephemeral drainage system, which causes localized ephemeral ponding. It is unclear why Jefferson County chose to divert the municipal storm water onto the private property to the east and southeast when the County could have simply extended the roadside ditch on the west side of East Marrowstone Road to the south on the west side of Baldwin Road (a county road) and eventually tightline this storm water to discharge onto the shoreline to the south. It is also unclear why there are no storm county owned water detention facilities utilized in this municipal separate storm sewer system (or other water quality protection systems based on the observations made by SNR that suggest the water quality of the storm water may not meet federal and state water quality requirements). Because the subject property has been cleared historically and reforestation has not occurred it has the properties of a prairie, with the vegetation in this area being mostly seasonal grasses that are dormant from late fall to early spring, which means evapotranspiration potential is minimal to non-existent. Although the soils observed by SNR will have moderate to high hydraulic conductivity, the slope on the subject property is steep enough that when significant precipitation events occur, surface water flows will be generated. These "natural" ephemeral surface water flows, combined with the storm water diverted onto the subject property from the west, encounter the disturbed topography and soil barriers placed when the drainage ditch was excavated to cause minor ephemeral ponding. None of these areas have the characteristics of wetland hydrology and none have near surface ground water present(there was no ground water observed in any test pits or anywhere on the bluff faces bounding the eastern portion of the subject property at depths of up to 15 feet below the ground surface). August 25,2011 Copyright m 2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I ��$ Marc Mauney Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 As discussed in this report, the soils on the subject property are 30 inches or less in depth and are believed to be ?' formed in glacial recessional outwash deposits. These soils have relatively high hydraulic conductivity above the glacial lodgment till underlying these materials. No cemented glacial till was observed in the test pits excavated in the °_ eastern portion of the subject property; however, cemented glacial till was observed at a depth of approximately 2-5 feet below the ground surface on the bluff face along the eastern property boundary. Minor unsaturated zone co preferential flow was observed in some of the test pits at the soil—parent material contact where the sand becomes more consolidated because the soil has a higher hydraulic conductivity than the parent material and because the subject property has a moderate slope to the east,southeast. None of the soils observed on the bluff faces or in the test pits exhibited hydric soil characteristics, which supports the observations that ground water was not present in any of the test pits nor has near surface ground water been present in these soils long enough for hydric soils to develop. Although most of the vegetation described for the sample plots on the Wetland Delineation Forms presented in Attachment B would be considered to be wetland vegetation per the Corps guidance documents, the majority of this vegetation is facultative (FAC) grasses that do not have physiological adaptations for life in saturated (and reducing) soil conditions. In fact, none of the FAC and FACW vegetation observed on the subject property had observable physiological adaptations for life in saturated soil conditions, even under magnification. This strongly suggests that a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions does not exist on the subject property. Based on SNR's field studies and research, NO wetland areas were observed and are not present on the subject property. August 25,2011 Copyright 0 2011 SNR Company 18 Wetland Identification and Delineation and tream Reconnaissance'eport Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number. 921094026 co 7 CONCLUSIONS z ° Based on SNR's research and field studies, there are no ratable wetland areas located on or within 300 feet of the cn subject property. Additionally, there were no naturally occurring critical areas streams observed on or within 300 feet of the subject property. e) z These studies and this report have either been prepared directly by me or under my direct supervision. If you have any ° questions or require more information, please contact me at 425-788-3015 at your convenience. Sincerely, SNR Company / e of Wash/ XJ / /CO ro' Steven F. Neugebauer—LHG, LEG, RG, PG, REA Principal BiologisVHydrogeologisVEngineertng Geologist State of Washington License Number 00347 \ Nydrogecleg'sr \ 347 \`v O (Steven F. Neugebauer) August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 120 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 REFERENCES T AAPG Bulletin, November 2005, NORTH AMERICAN STRATIGRAPHIC CODE,v. 89; no. 11; p. 1547-1591;doi: 10.1306107050504129. Adamus, P.R.,Clairain, E.J.,Jr., Smith, R.D.,and Young, R.E., 1987,Wetland Evaluation Technique(WET),v.2 of Methodology:Vicksburg, Miss., U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,Waterways Experiment Station,Operational Draft Technical Report, 206 p. +appendixes. ct, Berger,G.W.,and Easterbrook, D.J., 1993, Thermoluminescence dating tests for lacustrine,glaciomarine,and floodplain sediments from western Washington and British Columbia: Canadian Journal of Earth Science,v. 30, p. 1815-1828. Brandon, Mark T.,2004,The Cascadia subduction wedge:the role of accretion, uplift, and erosion. in"Earth Structure, An Introduction to Structural Geology and Tectonics", by B.A.van der Pluijm and S. Marshak, Second Edition, WCB/McGraw Hill Press, pp.566-574. Brandon, M.T., Roden-Tice, M. K., and Garver,J. I., 1998, Late Cenozoic exhumation of the Cascadia accretionary wedge in the Olympic Mountains, northwest Washington State:Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 110, p. 985-1009. Blunt, D.J.; Easterbrook, D.J.; Rutter, N.W., 1987,Chronology of Pleistocene sediments in the Puget Lowland, Washington. In Schuster,J. E.,editor, Selected papers on the geology of Washington:Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Bulletin 77, pp. 321-353. Booth, D. B., 1987,Timing and processes of deglaciation along the southern margin of the Cordilleran ice sheet. Pages 71-90 in W. F. Ruddiman and H. E.Wright, editor. North America and adjacent oceans during the last deglaciation (geology of North America).Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado. Booth, D. B., 1991, Glacier physics of the Puget lobe, southwest Cordilleran ice sheet: Geographie Physique et Quaternaire,v.45, pp.301-316. Booth, D. B., 1986,The formation of ice-marginal embankments into ice-dammed lakes in the eastern Puget Lowland, Washington, U.S.A.,during the late Pleistocene: Boreas,v. 15, pp. 247-263. Booth, D. B., 1991, Urbanization and the Natural Drainage System-Impacts, Solutions, and Prognoses: Northwest Environmental Journal,v. 7, pp.93-118. Booth, D. B.,and Hallet, B., 1993, Channel networks carved by subglacial water: Observations and reconstruction in the eastern Puget Lowland of Washington: Geological Society of America Bulletin,v. 105, pp. 671-683. Booth, D. B., 1994,Glaciofluvial infilling and scour of the Puget Lowland,Washington, during icesheet glaciation: Geology,v.22,pp.695-698. Booth, D., B.,Troost, K.G.,and Hagstrum, J. T., 2004, Deformation of Quatemary strata and its relationship to crustal folds and faults,central Puget Lowland, Washington:Geology, v. 32, pp. 505-508. Booth, D. B.,and Jackson,C. R., 1997, Urbanization of aquatic systems-degradation thresholds,stormwater detention,and limits of mitigation:Journal of American Water Resources Association: v. 33,no.5, pp. 1077- 1090. Booth, D. B.,and Henshaw, P.C.,2001, Rates of channel erosion in small urban streams:chapter in M.Wigmosta and S. Burges,eds., Land Use and Watersheds: Human Influence on Hydrology and Geomorphology in Urban and Forest Areas:AGU Monograph Series,Water Science and Application Volume 2,pp. 17-38. Booth, D. B., Hartley, D., and Jackson, C. R.,2002, Forest cover, impervious-surface area,and the mitigation of stormwater impacts:Journal of the American Water Resources Association,v. 38, pp.835-845. Booth, D. B., Haugerud, R.A.,and Troost, K. G., Geology,watersheds, and Puget Lowland rivers: Chapter in: D. R. Montgomery, S. Bolton, D. B. Booth,and L.Wall,eds., 2003, Restoration of Puget Sound Rivers: University of Washington Press, pp. 14-45. Booth, D.B.,Troost, K.G., Clague,J.J., and Waitt, R.B., 2003,The Cordilleran ice sheet:chapter in Gillespie,A., Atwater, B., and Porter, S. C.,eds.,Advances in Research in Quaternary Geology of the United States: International Union for Quaternary Research. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 121 etland Identi cation and Delineation and team Reconnaissance-eport Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Cantu Parcel Number. 921094026 W Booth, D. B.,Troost, K. G., and Hagstrum,J. T., 2004, Deformation of Quaternary strata and its relationship to crustal folds and faults,central Puget Lowland,Washington: Geology,v.32, pp. 505-508. „,, Booth, D. B.,Troost, K. G., Clague,J.J., and Waitt, R. B.,2004,The Cordilleran ice sheet: Chapter 2 in Gillespie,A., Porter, S. C.,and Atwater, B.,eds.,The Quatemary Period in the United States: International Union for Quaternary Research, Elsevier Press, pp. 17-43. ku Booth, D. B., Spring 2006, Fluvial Geomorphology Course Text, ESS 426. Brandon, M.T„ Roden-Tice, M.K.,and Garver,J.I., 1998, Late Cenozoic exhumation of the Cascadia accretionary wedge in the Olympic Mountains, NW Washington State. Geological Society of America Bulletin,v. 110, no.8, p.985-1009. Brown,et al,April 1981, Metamorphic facies and tectonics in parts of the Cascade Range and Puget Lowlands of Northwestern Washington,Geological Society of America. Bucknam, R. C., Hemphill-Haley, E., and Leopold, E. B., 1992,Abrupt uplift within the past 1700 years at southern Puget Sound, Washington, Science, v.258, pp. 1611-1614. Burchfiel, B.C., Lipman, P.W., and Zoback, M. L., (eds.), 1992, The Cordilleran Orogen:Conterminous U.S., Geology of North America,v.G-3, Geological Society of America, Boulder,Colorado, pp.261-406. Cheney, E.S., 1997, What is the age and extent of the Cascade magmatic arc? Washington Geology, v.25, pp. 28-32. Christiansen, R. L.,Yeats, R. S., Graham, S.A., Niem, W.A., Niem,A. R. &Snavely, P. D., Jr., 1992, Post-Laramide geology of the U.S.Cordilleran region. In: Burchfiel, B. C., Lipman, P.W. &Zoback, M. L. (eds)The Geology of North America,Volume G-3: The Cordilleran Orogen;Conterminous U.S. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America, pp.261-406. Clague,J.J.,and Bobrowsky, P.J., 1994b, Evidence for a large earthquake and tsunami 100-400 years ago on western Vancouver Island, British Columbia:Quatemary Research, v. 41, p. 176-184. Clague,J.J.and Bobrowsky, P.J., 1990, Holocene sea level change and crustal deformation,southwestern British Columbia. Clayton, Lee,Attig,J. W., Mickelson, D. M.,Johnson,J. D.,and Syverson, K. M.,2006,Glaciation of Wisconsin, Educational Series 36, 3rd ed.,Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, Madison, Wisconsin. Cooke, S. S.,A Field Guide to the Common Wetland Plants of Western Washington&Northwestern Oregon:Seattle Audubon Society,The Trailside Series, 1997. Cowardin, Lewis M.,Virginia Carter, Francis C.Golet,and Edward T. LaRoe, 1979, Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-79/31. Dethier, D. P., Pessl, Fred Jr., Keuler, R. F., Balzarini, M.A.,and Pevear, D. R., 1995,Late Wisconsinan glaciomarine deposition and isostatic rebound, northern Puget Lowland, Washington:Geological Society of America Bulletin,v. 107, pp. 1288-1303. Downs, P.W., 1995,Estimating the probability of river channel adjustment: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, v.20, pp.687-705. Easterbrook, D.J., 1969, Pleistocene chronology of the Puget Lowland and San Juan Islands,Washington:Geological Society of America Bulletin,v.80, p.2273-2286. Easterbrook, D.J., Crandell, D. R.,and Leopold, E. B., 1967, Pre-Olympia Pleistocene Stratigraphy and Chronology in the Central Puget Lowland,Washington: Geological Society of America Bulletin,v.78,pp. 13-20. Environmental Laboratory.(1987). "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual,”Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. Fetherston, K.L., Naiman, R.J.,and Bilby, R. E., 1995, Large woody debris,physical process, and riparian forest development in montane river networks of the Pacific Northwest:Journal of Geomorphology,v. 13, pp. 133- 144. Fisher,et al, 1997, Geologic processes of accretion in the Cascadia subduction zone west of Washington State, Geodynamics 16"0888#166_177. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report 122 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 Franklin, J.F.and Dyrness, C.T., 1988, Natural vegetation of Oregon and Washington:Oregon State University Press, 70 Corvallis, OR. Geological Survey of Canada, Current research, Part E—Cordillera and Pacific margin:Geological Survey of Canada n, Paper,v. 90-1 E, pp. 245-250. Gillespie,A. R., Porter, S.C.,and Atwater, B. F.(eds.), 2004, The Quaternary Period in the United States: a Developments in Quaternary Science, v. 1, Elsevier, pp. 17-23. n Gillespie,A.,and Molnar, P., 1995,Asynchronous maximum advances of mountain and continental glaciers, Rev. Geophys., 33(3), 311-364,doi:10.1029/95RG00995. Google, Google Earth Professional,2011. Hagstrum,J.T., D.B. Booth, K.G.Troost and R.J Blakely,"Magnetostratigraphy, Paleomagnetic Correlation,and Deformation of Pleistocene Deposits in the South Central Puget Lowland,Washington,"in The Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth,vol. 107(B4), (April 10, 2002),article no.2079. Harris,A. G.,and Tuttle, E., 1977, Geology of National Parks: Kendall Hunt, Dubuque, Iowa. Harvey, M. D. and C. C. Watson. 1986.Fluvial processes and morphologic thresholds in incised channel restoration. Water Resources Bulletin. 22(3): 359-368. Hey, R. D. 1976. Impact prediction in the physical environment. Hey, R. D. 1997.Stable river morphology. In: C. R.Thorne, R. D. Hey and M. D. Newson.Applied Fluvial Geomorphology for River Engineering and Management. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. pp. 223-236. 367 pp. Hey, R. D.and C. R.Thome. 1986. Stable channels with mobile gravel beds.Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 112. Hitchcock, C.L. and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA. HistoryLink.Org,2011, http://www.historylink.org/. Hooke,J. M. 1997. Styles of channel change. In: C. R.Thome, R. D. Hey and M. D. Newson. 1997. Hruby,T.,W.E.Cesanek,and K.E. Miller. 1995. Estimating relative wetland values for regional planning. Wetlands 15(2):93-106. Jefferson County jMap, http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/idms/mapserver.shtml M.Wigmosta and S. Burges(eds.)Land Use and Watersheds: Human Influence on Hydrogeology and Geomorphology in Urban and Forest Areas.AGU Monograph Series, Water Science and Application Vol.2, pp. 17-38. The Geology of North America v. K-3. Geological Society of America, Boulder,Colorado. pp 71-90 J.T. Hagstrum, D. B. Booth, K. G.Troost,and R.J. Blakely,2002,Magnetostratigraphy,paleomagnetic correlation, and deformation of Pleistocene deposits in the south-central Puget Lowland, Washington:Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth 107(B4): art. no.2079 Apr 10 2002. (Reprint) Kirby, Stephen,et al, The Cascadia Subduction Zone and Related Subduction Systems—Seismic Structure, Intraslab Earthquakes and Processes, and Earthquake Hazards, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-328. Kollmorgen Corporation. 1994. Munsell soil color charts. Kollmorgen Corporation, Baltimore, MD. Lasmanis, Raymond, 1991, The geology of Washington: Rocks and Minerals, v.66, no.4,pp.262-277. Leopold, L. B., M. G.Wolman and J. P. Miller. 1964. Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology.W. H. Freeman& Company, San Francisco, CA. Leopold, L. B.and M.G. Wolman. 1957. River Channel Patterns-Braided,Meandering and Straight. Professional Paper 282B. U. S.Geological Survey. Liberty, Lee M., Pape, K., Sherrod, B. L., Blakely, R. J.,Weaver, C. S., Kelsey, H. M., Bamett, E.,and Meagher, K. L., "Finding Concealed Active Faults: Extending the Southern Whidbey Island Fault Across the Puget Lowland, Washington."Journal of Geophysical Research 113.B05313(2008):doi: 10.1029/2007JB005060. Malanson,G. M.and D. R. Butler. 1990. Woody debris, sediment, and riparian vegetation of a subalpine river, Montana, USA.Arctic and Alpine Research. 22(2): 183-194. McShane, Dan, Marrowstone Island Geology Trip to see Nodules(actually concretions)and Lips: Reading The Washington Landscape blogspot, September 11,2010. August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 123 Wetland Idenbfication and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance eport Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 r;; Montgomery, D. R.and J. M. Buffington. 1998. Channel Processes, Classification, and Response. R. Naiman and R. Bilby,editors. River Ecology and Management. Springer-Verlag, Inc., New York, NY u+ Nakamura, F.and F.J. Swanson. 1993.Effects of coarse woody debris on morphology and sediment storage of a °C mountain stream system in western Oregon. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. W O'Riordan,T.,and R. D. Hey,editors. Environmental Impact Assessment. Saxon House, Famborough, UK. pp.71-81. F-18 Appendix F. Olympic Mountain Formation from Accretion of the Juan de Fuca tectonic plate under the North American Plate— Evergreen College, Field Trip Guide to Skokomish Basin, Olympic Mountains,2004. Paustian, S.J., K.Anderson, D. Blanchet, S. Brady, M. Cropley,J. Edgington,et al. 1992.A channel type users guide for the Tongass National Forest, southeast Alaska.Technical Paper R10-TP-26. U. S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service,Alaska Region 10. Pessl, Fred,Jr., Dethier, D.P., Booth, D.B.,and Minard,J.P., 1989, Surficial geologic map of the Port Townsend 30-by 60-minute quadrangle, Puget Sound region,Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-1198-F, scale 1:100,000. Porter, S. C., and Swanson, T. W., 1998, Radiocarbon age constraints on rates of advance and retreat of the Puget lobe of the Cordilleran ice sheet during the last glaciation:Quat. Research,v.50, pp.205-213. Puget Sound LiDAR Consortium,2011, LiDAR Imagery, htto://ougetsoundlidar.ess.washington.edul. Pratt,T.L.,et al. 2002. Understanding the Seismotectonics of the Cascadia Subduction Zone: Overview and Recent Seismic Work,Terra Publishing,Tokyo,Japan. Reed, P.B.Jr. 1988. National list of plant species that occur in wetlands: Washington. Biological Report NERC- 88/18.47 for National Wetlands Inventory,Washington, D.C. Reppert, R.T.,et al. 1979. Wetland values:concepts and methods for wetland evaluation. Research Report 79-R1. U.S.Army Corps of Engineers. Institute for Water Resources, Fort Belvoir,VA. Richards, K. 1982. Rivers. Methuen and Company, New York, NY.358 pp. Richards, K.and S. N. Lane. 1997. Prediction of morphological changes in unstable channels. In: C. R. Thome, R. D. Hey and M. D. Newson.Applied Fluvial Geomorphology for River Engineering and Management.John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. pp.269-292.367 pp. Rosgen, D. L. 1994.A classification of natural rivers.Catena.22: 169-199. Ruddiman,W. F.and Wright, H. E.Jr. (eds.)North America and Adjacent Oceans During the Last Deglaciation. Schellart,W. P., Freeman,J.,Stegman, D. R., Moresi,L.,and May, D., Evolution and diversity of subduction zones controlled by slab width:Nature 446, 308-311 (15 March 2007)doi:10.10381nature05615. Schoeneberger, P.J.,Wysocki, D.A., Benham, E.C.,and Broderson,W.D. (editors), 2002, Field book for describing and sampling soils, Version 2.0.Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center,Lincoln, NE. Schumm, S.A.and R.W. Lichty. 1965. Time space and causality in geomorphology.American Journal of Science. 263: 110-119. Schumm, S.A. 1977. Geomorphic thresholds:The concept and its applications. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. Schumm, S.A. 1980. Some applications of the concepts of geomorphic thresholds. In: D. R. Coates and J.Vitek, editors.Thresholds in Geomorphology.Allen&Unwin, London, UK. pp.473-485. Schumm, S.A., Harvey, M. D., and Watson,C.C., 1984, Incised Channels:Morphology, Dynamics, and Control. Water Resources Publications, Littleton, CO. Sinclair, K.A.and Garrigues,R.S., 1994, Geology,Water Resources,and Seawater Intrusion Assessment of Marrowstone Island,Jefferson County,Washington: Water Supply Bulletin 59,Washington State Department of Ecology. Soil Survey Staff.2010. Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 11th ed. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC. August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 124 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 Soil Survey Staff, 1999, Soil Taxonomy,A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys, 72 2nd ed. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service,Washington, DC. ^' T Stanley,W. D.,Johnson,S.Y., Qamar,A. I.,Weaver, C. S.,Williams,J. M.,Tectonics and seismicity of the southern m Washington Cascade Range: BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 1996 86: 1-18. Swanson,T.W.,2003,Late Pleistocene Glacial History of Whidbey Island, Washington;Geological Society of America a Field Trip#14. Thackray,G.D., 1996, Chronology of Middle and Late Wisconsin glacier advances on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington:synchronous with North Atlantic cooling cycles?(abstract). Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs 28(7):234. Thackray,G. D. and Pazzaglia, F.J., 1994,Quaternary stratigraphy,tectonic geomorphology, and fluvial evolution of the western Olympic Peninsula,Washington, in Swanson, D.A.,and Haugerud, R.A.,editors,Geologic field trips in the Pacific Northwest, 1994. Thorne, C. R. 1997. Channel Types and Morphological Classification. In: C. R.Thome, R. D. Hey and M. D. Newson. Applied Fluvial Geomorphology for River Engineering and Management.John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. pp. 175-222. 367 pp. USACE Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region U.S.Army Corps of Engineers U.S.Army Engineer Research and Development Center, 3909 Halls Ferry Road,Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199, May 2010. United States Environmental Protection Agency,the United States Army Corps of Engineers, December 2,2008, Questions and Answers Regarding the Revised Rapanos &Carabell Guidance. USDA,NRCS. 2010. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. Version 7.0. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service,Washington, D.C. USDA, NRCS. April 1998. Guidelines for Estimating Soil Moisture Conditions. USDA, NRCS. 2010,Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 11w'Edition. USDA, NRCS.2011.The PLANTS Database(http://Dlants.usda.pov,23 August 2011). National Plant Data Team, Greensboro,NC 27401-4901 USA. United States Department of Fish and Wildlife,Wetland Inventory Maps,Wetland Mapper,2011. Wang, K., He,J., Dragert, H.,and James,T. S.,Three-dimensional viscoelastic interseismic deformation model for the Cascadia subduction zone: Earth Planets Space,53,295-306,2001. Washington Public Utility District Association, History of the Public Utility Districts, 2011, http://www.wDuda.oro/oud- historv.cfm. Washington State Department of Ecology, 1971,Reconnaissance of Sea Water Intrusion along Costal Washington, 1966- 1968,Water Supply Bulletin Number 32,Walters,including plates Washington State Department of Ecology. 1997. Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual. Publication#96-94. Washington Department of Ecology, Olympia,WA. Washington State Department of Ecology. 2000. Methods for Assessing Wetland Functions Volume l: Riverine and Depressional Wetlands in the Lowlands of Western Washington(Part land Part 2)and Volume Il: Depressional Wetlands in the Columbia Basin of Eastern Washington(Part land Part 2). Publications#99- 115,#99-116,#00-06-47,#00-06-48.Washington Department of Ecology, Olympia,WA. Washington State Department of Ecology, February 2005, Storm Water Management Manual for Western Washington, Publication Numbers 05-10-029 through 05-10-033(Replaces Publication Numbers 99-11 through 99-15). Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, SalmonScape,2010 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2005, Regional Fisheries Enhancement Program/Annual Report for July 1, 2004-June 30, 2005. Washington State Department of Ecology. 2004. Washington State wetland rating system for western Washington— Revised and eastern Washington—Revised. Publication#04-06-025 and#04-06-15. Washington State Department of Ecology,Well Logs, 2011,http://apos.ecv.wa.gov/welllogl. August 25,2011 Copynght m 2011 SNR Company 125 Wetland Identification and Delineation and tream•econnaissance"wort Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 W Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Geologic Map of Washington State, Northwest Quadrant, 2002. Whetten,J.T., Carroll, P.I., Gower, H.D., Brown, E.H.,and Pessl, Fred,Jr., 1988, Bedrock geologic map of the Port W Townsend 30-by 60-minute quadrangle, Puget Sound Region,Washington: U.S.Geological Survey x Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-1198-G,scale 1:100,000. Whiting, P.J.and J. B. Bradley. 1993.A process-based classification for headwater streams. Earth Surface Processes �+ and Landforms. 18: 603-612. WHNP, 1997 Endangered, threatened, and sensitive plants of Washington. Washington State Department of Natural Resources,Washington Natural Heritage Program, Olympia,WA. August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 726 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 1 C, m a C/J m ATTACHMENT A- SITE MAP August25,2011 Copyright 0 2011 SNR Company ATTACHMENT A - SITE MAP Z g [5 2 H • ilk o ` 4 , Q O 0 g 3 z _ m ww z w� ,- N . < C z aa t _*• m E � r.. .- e, "t r f 7' ' { N -, g �► i dill 1 -c� 5a , a E$ . "49 cgs :l9! a o •i z a 7. < „ O .M! Ytq yY m - y; o I 'ENO )r t�,��;_: ',cif. i �;'t, � j V` y ,1 y C h ` , C 'y7 w F4� . W_ . a Yt� �SK �L#� C4-S . -0,-,--+.•.mr m•e. '1l 2i�r 4. ' ' q ti 1 .1040.::: ., ....' - ,...z,- 11%107,,. ; I. 1. E . tz - L.,* 1.4,14.;.-4, - - 14(-4P 4,... , , ii..- ..-*-1(...A I h''.: fiC 1 L K 1YL ..:• ry..- t '' '',V‹F •, 1� W .„ -, `. "rte � ; ��. "yam;` k' 2‘ t 'I 11'�[ _ 3 R , �i Z y'-.- % J Si.' .7 $.glu Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance-eport Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson 128 Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number: 921094026 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 129 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 a c) m CO � I m r z m r m a 0 ATTACHMENT B - WETLAND DELINEATION FORMS T O August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 130 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA JeffersonCounty Parcel Number: 921094026 GO 2 CC Cl LL z WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region 0 Project/Sib Mooney/Rogerson Property CAN/County Jefferson County Sampling Date 6/062011 1—. Applicant/Owner Mare Mooney and Lynne Rogerson State WA Sampling Point SP1 Q Investigator(s) Steve Neugebeuerend Stave Belluomini Section.Township,Range SE Gtr Sec 9,TN 29N,R IE I.IJ Lendbrm(hiltlape,terrace,ete) Tebbe Local Reiel(conceve,convex,none) Concave Slope(%) 7.5% Subregion(LRR) LRR A Letiude 43.016993' Longitude -122680793' Debra WC>S84 !Soil Map Unit Nam Everett/Son Juan gravelly windy loam NWI CYSSilleetion PEMA —I .Are climatcA,ydroiogic condtions on the ab typical for this erne crow?Tess No0(If no,explain in remarks) NJ Are Vagetation0,Soil 0.or Hydrology 0 signirrcently disturbed? Me Normal Circumstances'present?Yes® No0 0 Are Vegebtion0,Soil 0,or Hydrology 0 naturally problematic' (If needed,explain any answers Y remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map shovel •samplingpolnt locations transeds Ira•• ant features eta Wetland Vegetation Present? Yes® No❑ ---------- ---- 1=1 Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes❑ No m Within a Wetland? Ves5 No Z Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No El a Remoras: Nioogh stool PCpelly has been historically diluted ty dear Cut nee harvesting S:Wee and dodged one toxin surface Water hid-dogs lhs did not affect J SPR's bib to mace ddaminekrs mey bland Moser The tree harvesting ectivries have been CCracled on enmity dl parcels al Marwsone Island as IWOtther gourd dsNxbences ambled wit agcudua adngies heels bcaled n e relcl glacial meltwater newel wth delege IC Ilse southeast A manmade Osage elm het been er0euted in who is now s'modern Jai epemera drainage fealre with:he Clodgled removed sale impacting natural drainage to the east W VEGETATON—Use scientific names of plaits. Tree Stratum(Plot sib:710 e) wbsd00 :rennin 0dcaor Dominance Test Worksheet: %Cover Spades? Sinus 1. 2. Number of Dominant Species That an (A) Ob.FACW or FAC: QS >TObl Caves Percent of Dormant Species That Are INS) Sepiino/Shmb Stratum(Plot Sloe:32011`) 081.FACW.or FAC l— 1. Rose Harem Modica rose) 5 ''FAC Prevalence Index worksheet Z 2. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: ll.1 9. DEL Species a 1= Total Cover FACU Spades a 4= 5 Heat StrsWm(Plot Size 320 Ili) UPL Species x5= = 1. C4sim anew(Canada 5 FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) thistle) V species)2 Cana al).(sedge species) FACW- Prevalence Index=9/A= Q MC I— 3. Juncos sp.Caen species) 5 FACW- NydropnyUc Vegetation Indicators! FAC I— 4. Ph•iru erundwucas(reed 15 FACW Qcanarygrass) 5. Census?quaneah(Common 3 FACW 0 Rapid Test for Hydrophytle Vegetation Cam's) S. Rumex crisp's(curly dock) 4 FAC ® Dominance Test is>50% 7. Renunculua Iona gat 7 FACW 0 Prevalence Index is S3.0' buttercup) 9. Equisaum ersema(eommon 5 FAC 0 Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting detain Remarks or horsetail) on a separate sheet) 9. AVvelis al)(beAgrab sp.) 10 0 Welland Non-Vascular Planta' 10. Assists.sp.(Fescue sp.) 20 FAC 0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation(Explain) ' 11. Law sr sp(began ap.) 10 FAC 'Indicators of hydrk not and wetland hydrology must be present.uMess disturbed or problematic. 12. Ph(eum pretense(common 8 FAC y) 13. Poe sp.(duegrasa sp.) 6 FAC crab Cram Wetland Woody Vine Sbatem(Plot Size 320 HI Vegetation 1. I Present? Yeas No0 2 ; °Tobl Cover %San Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks:The damral species b agful to stud/area are row relive grasses raging from FACW-FACU Weever rte orty FPCW grass is',halals aundnacea which is NOT FACW in the Puget Lowlands and is madly present due to the ds1abed soil conditions I.realised differences is vegdohm within 20 fed of the sample plot are toted above(320 square feel).Al Carex and Juncos are FACW pa Reed C a 1 and)he USDA for Region Ix,20'1 However,these spines lard the other species observed did cad have any observable adaptaions necessary.even Wer nagecalion to be the prevalel veoelahon in saturated sod unddions Misdeed US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains.Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 131 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 a a c) SOIL Sampling Pdrd:SP1 = Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the Indlceta or confirm the bbsence of Indicators( M Math Redo(Features Depth Cdor(Mdd) ' % Color(Moist) % Type' La:` Texture Remarks T (Inches) Z 0.8 10YR 33 0 WA 0 Dark brown,moist.sligntiy silty,well sorted,angular to subangular.poorly —I graded.medium sand. Sandy loam. 8-24 10YR 812 -0 NIA 0 Light brownish gray.moist slightly silty.well sorted,angular to 03 subangular,poorly graded.medium sand. Sandy loam. • T 'Type:C=Concentration,DsDapeticn,RM•Reducad Matrix CS=Covered or Coated Swid Grains. toction:PL•Pore Lining M=Matnx —I Hyasc Soti Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRS,unless otherwise noted.) InNwtars forProbiemetic HydrIc 9011w' r 0 Hislosd(All 0 Sandy Redox(S5) 0 2 cm Muck(A10) 0 Medic Epipedon(A2) 0 Shipped Matrix(Se) 0 Red Parent Material(TF2) a O slack Hisec(A3) 0 Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) 0 Very Shallow Dark Surface Z 0 Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) 0 Loamy Greyed Matrix(F2) ] Other(Explain in Remarks) O Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) 0 Depleted Matrix(F3) Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and p 0 Thick Dery Surface(Al2) 0 Radon Dark Surface(FS) wetland hydrology must be present, O Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) 0 Depleted Dark Surface(F7) unless disturbed or problematic. 0 Sandy Greyed Matrix(54) 0 Rader Depressions(F8) 0 Restrictive Layer(I/present): T Type: Mythic boll Present? Yee 0 No Depth(inches) I- ConduNed in lateral drainage nape ditch area with mare prevalent plant populations of Caro end Juncus. Ares Is inundated during _ significant precipitation events,but not inundated at the time field studio were conducted. Vary minor unsaturated zone flow was noted Z at the bottom of the test pit. Minor oxidation observed. 1. F/1 a 1 HYDROLOGY - _.... _ Wetland Hydrology Indicators: O Primary Indicators(minimum of one required,check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(2 a more required) 0 Surface Water(Al) 0 Water-Stained Leaves(99)(except MU 0 Wtr-Stained Leaves(89)pima 1,2,4A, Z 0 High Water Table(A2) 1,2,4A,and 48) 48) 0 Saturation(AS) 0 Salt Crust(811) 0 Drainage Patterns(BID) 0 Water Marks(81) 0 Aquatic Invertebrates(813) 0 Dry.Season Water Table(C2) "Ti O Sediment Deposits(82) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) 0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery G 0 DWI Depestta(82) 0 Oxidized Rhiaospheres along Living (`O3) 0 Algal Mat or Crust(94) Roots(C3) ❑ Geomorphic Position(02) MI 0 Iron Deposits(83) 0 Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) O Shallow Aquitard(03) O Surface Soil Cracks(88) 0 Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils 0 FAC-Neutral Test(DS) 3 0 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (CO) 0 Raised Ant Mounds(DS)(LRR Al (87) CO 0 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 0 Stunted or Stressed Plants(Di)PAR 0 Frost-Heave Hummocks(07) sit) A Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations Surface Water Proanl Yea No0 Deplh(inches) Water Table Present? Yea Nola Depth(inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yo0 No0 Saturation Present? Yea No Depth(inehea) (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Dela(strum gauge.monitoring welt aerial photos,previous Inspections),if available: Well loge from the Department of Ecology,air photographs from Doagle Earth Professional.Jefferson County DIS,and WDFW SalmonScap. Remarks: Conducted in a lateral drainage ditch,no ground water or surface weber was observed. Minor uneu ureted zone preferential flow observed at 24'. Modified US Army Carps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast–Version 2.0 August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 132 I Wetland Idendficabon and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA JeffersonCounty Parcel Number: 921094026 5 cc O WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Project/Site MeuneyRtogerson Properly City/County Jefferson County Sampling Data 6/062011 Applicant/Owner Marc Moony end Lynne Rogerson Stet. WA Sampling Point SP2 et Hvastigetw(s) SteveN.ugsbeuer and SrevaBelunmini Section,Township,Range SE Qtr See 9,TN 29N,R 1E I.IJ Landbrm(hMaloc e,terrace,etc) Terrace Local Relief(concave,convex,none) Concave Slope(%) 7.5% 1 Subeyon(LORI LRRA Lettude 45015993' Longitude -122.680783' Datum W0584 Sot Map Unit Name Evrea/Ban Juan gravelly sandy loam NWI Classification PEMA An climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?Yea® No0(If no,explain in remarks) lJ.l Are Vegetation0.Soil 0,or Hydrology 0 signihc anti disturbed? Are Normal Circumstances'present?Yes 0 No0 An Vegetebon0,Sail 0.or Hydrology 0 natu•ally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transacts,Important features,etc. C !Wetland Vegetation Present? Yes O No❑ Is the Sampled Area Hydic Soil Present? Yes 0 No® Within a Wetland? YesO No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yea 0 No El Q Remarks: Although sasses cropery has been restores y Oh-sled by clear cut tree harvesting wireless end modfcalions to the surface eyelet lyddogy the did not affect S.Rs attYty'on-die cdemausions on ate wetland indca or The tree harvesting activities hese been condurled on virtually al panels on Macuaslone!dand as hale other gourd d$hNbar0es ass:celled vnlh agoutual Violets Pees is located in a relict gavel meltweha channel nth Mange to the southeast A manmade drainage dtch has teen excavate]in whorl re now a-medern day'Myriad*atoge Haire with the dorlpled removed soils impacting natural dranage to the end W VEGETATION-Use scientific names of plants. _.— Test Tree Strom(Plot six:7106` Pnsaub Dominant Status - --- _ _ ( ) are Cower Spectre, ✓ores Dominance Test Worksheet 1. • 2. Number of Dominant Species That an (A) a OBL,FACW or FAC: m 4. Total Number of Dominant Species (B) 5._. _ Across MI Strata I— pTdal Cover Percent of Dominant Species Thal Are (AB) SaplenglShnsb Stratum(Plot Siam:32011 OBL,FACW,or FAC !L t. [Rosa nutdena(Nooike rose) it FAC Prevalence Index worksheet 2. I Gau!Mrr shallot)(S.tefj 5 Tote%Cover of MuNpy by 2 3. - OBL Species x t= = Total CO/Of FACU apesiaa x 4 Herb Stratum (Plot Size 320 ax) UPL Species x5= 1. Cirsium enema(Canada 5 FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) a _''thistle) I— 2 Lanes sp.(sedge species) 10 FACW• Prevalence Index u B/Au FAC 3, Juncos sp.(rush species) 5 FACW- Nyeroplrytic Vegetation Indkaon: MC 4. Rubes unit=(trailing 5 FACU blerkbeny) 6. Rubus ds<dor(Hinalayen B FACU 0 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Nerkberry 6. Asir sp. 6 FAC 0 Dominance Test is>50% 7. Featrwe sp. 6 FAC 0 Prevalence Index Is 53.0' B. Lawn sp. 10 FACU 0 Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. Agrostts sp.(bentgnss sp.) 20 FAC 0 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10. PAfeem patens°(consnon 3 FAC 0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation(Explain) timothy) 11. Pre sp..(bluegrass) 20 FAC 'Inductors of hydric soil end wetland hydrology must be present,unless 12. P7oYris arvndmecee(reed 1 FACW disturbed or problematic. caner/grass) =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum(Plot Size 320&) 1. 2. =Tang Cosa %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remade:The dormant species throughout the study see ere ronrott a grasses ri girgfom FACW-MU,however the any FPCW gas tc Phalads auMnaceawtsdt is NOT PPM in Is Puget Lawlsrds and is prnaiy present due to*disturbed sail coedlims Locdaed differences invegddwnselnn2O feel of the sandy plot ere holed above(320 mean reel) Ai Carex and Junes are FACW per Read a 5,19E8 ere the USDA for Region Ix.edit However,these spaia land the other species observed old not have eny xceretle adaptations naessay,erm under TegnrfslltR to be the prevalent vegetation in saturated soil condions Modified US Army Caps of Engineers Weston Mountains,Valleys.and Coast-Version 2.0 August 25,2011 Copyright 0 2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 133 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 a a Cl SOIL Sampl)n•Point:SP2 = Prone Description:(Describe lots 4pth needed to document Use or corabm the absence of indicators) 3 Matrix Radon Features Depth Color(Mart) % Colr(Mdat) % Type' L. Texan Remarks IT Inches Z 0-12 10YR 4/2 0 N/A 0 Dark meylsh brown,moist,slightly silty,well sorted,angular to —1 1 subangular,poorly graded,fine to send.San• Mem 17-24 10YR 812 0 WA 0 Light brownish may moist,sightly W silty,subrounded to rounded,pebbly, well sorted,angular to subangulsr, ••sari •-dad,tine sand.San. loam cc I 'T,•e:C=Concentration.D=Depleaon,RM=Reduced Matrix,CS•Cover.d or Coated Sand Grains Lonsien:PL•Pon thin. M•Mabix r HyOlc Soil mdlcetors:(Applicable loan LRRS,unless otherwise noted.) imitators for Problematic ydlc Soil 0 Hislesol(Al) 0 Sandy Redox(55) 0 2 cm Muck(A10) a 0 Hiatt Epipedon(A2) 0 Skipped Marina(Se) 0 Red Parent Material(TF2) Z ❑ Black Histic(A3) 0 Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA I) 0 Very Shallow Dark Surface 1 0 Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) 0 Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) p Other(Explain In Remarks) 0 0 Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) 0 Depleted Matrix(F3) Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and O Thick Dark Surfer*(Al2) 0 Radon Dark Surface(FB) wetland hydrology must be present. 0 Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) 0 Depleted Dark Surface(F7) unless disturbed or problematic. Q • Sand GI*ed Matrix S4 • R•dox Da•ressions F8 Restrictive Layer(If present): - — IT Type: Hydnc Soli Presera? Yes 0 No® I— De•-h inches i _ Conducted near mulch mound. Soil has high matt content(basalt,possibly•ndesite),moor oxidation observed,but no oxidation In live plant rot casts to 18°below ground surface. Z IT p HYDROLOGY — Wetland Hydrology Indicators: O Primary Indicators(minimum A aim required,chock all that so ) Secondary Indicators(2 or more required) Z 0 Surface Water(Al) Weer-Stained Leaves(89)(except MLRA Water-Stained Leaves(139)(MLRA 1.2,4A, 0 High Water Table(A2) 1,2,4A,end MB) 4. 0 Saturation(A3) 0 Salt Crust(811) 0 Drainage Patterns(810) T) 0 Water Marks(B1) 0 Aquatic Invertebrates(813) 0 Dry-Season Water Table(C2) O O Sediment Deposits(B2) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C7) 0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery O Drift Deposits(B2l 0 Oxidized Rhieospherea along Living (C8) rD 0 Algal Mat or Crust(84) Rods(CS) 0 Geomorphic Position(D2) O Iron Deposits(83) 0 Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) 0 Shallow Aquitard(03) E 0 Surface Soil Cracks(Be) 0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils 0 FAC-Neulnl Ted(DS) O Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (CB) 0 Raised Ant Mountie(DB)ILRR A) CO (ell Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 0 Stunted or Stressed Plants(01)(LRR 0 Frost-Heave Hummocks(07) MS) A) 0 Other(Explain in Remarks) _ Plaid Observations Surfer*Water Present Yee No Depth(inches) Water Table Present? Yea No Depth(inches) Wetland Hydrology Present? vest] No0 Saturation Present? Yes No Depth(Inches) (includes capillary hinge) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Well logs from the Department of Ecology,air photographs from Goodie Earth Proreesional,Jefferson County GIS,and WOFW SMmonScape. Remarks: Conducted in area where trees were removed in early 1990s and where debris wee stockpiled and buried es a°mulch pile'. Modified US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains.Valleys.and Coast—Version 2.0 • • • August 25 2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company 134 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA JeffersonCounty Parcel Number. 921094026 GO 5 cc O 6L WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Z o •Project/Sae Maun ey A ogefs an Propert y City/County Jefferson County Sampling Deb 6/04/2011 _.. Applicant/Owes Marc Meuney Intl Lynne Ragemon Stale WA Sampling Point SP3 a kwestigetors) Stew Naugebauer and Stave Belluornini Section.Township,Range SE Ctr Sec 9,TN 29N,R 1E LJJ L•ndform(hildope,iwr•ca,ale) Tenon Local RskN(cancave,come;none) Concave Slop(%) 7.5% Subrey on(LRR) LRRA Latitude 49.015893' Longitude -122880793- Deturn WGS34 Soil Map Unit Nome EveretbSen Juan Bawdy Gandy loam NWI Classification PEMA — J Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the sea typical for this Urns of year?Yes® No0(Ifno.explain in remarks) LJJ Are Vegetation)],Soil 0,or Hydrology 0 significantly disturbed? Asa'Normal Circumstances'present?Yes 0 Ne0 C:3 Are Vegetation)],Soil 0,or Hydrology 0 naturally problematic? (Ifnvaded.explain any answers in remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site map shohlnp samplirtspolrttlocatlons,transacts,important features,etc. C Wetland Vegetation Present? Yes IA No 0 Is the Sampled Area Hydric Sot Present? Yes 0 No® mean a Wetlen ? yes)] No rg Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes0 No Cr Remarks: Although stun a1 property has been historically dish/lied by clear cis treeharrelyy activities and modreaio 1loge5ar`sce water tytrcogyIlls Rd nor DWI —I SUPS ahiry to twee de amine ions on cry wetlandexlctlor.The tree harvesting acevles here been omitsladenvtnms dl parcels an Mmosatone Island as H Ives otnei gourd dstwherces associated wlh egu tzal a:annes Nee is heated in a reed gadal meltwater dennel with damage to to southeast AntEM1nade damage ddoh hes been isoavated in wid'snow e'morbn da(ephemeral drat nags fed ae wan the Aoekpled removed scan impacting rxartl Menage tor*east LL VEGETATION-Use selemlllc names oar plants. Tract Stratum(Plot size:710 K) Absolute Domnars tricolor Dominance Test Worksheet %mOVer Seeress 51811fi I. 3. Number C Dominant FAC:Species That are (A) 3, BBL.FACW or FAC: CD 4. Total Number of Dominant Species B) 8, Across All Strati I-- eTnlal Cover Percent of Dominant Species That Are (NB) 2 Ssolino Bhrub Steam(Plot Stn:320 IF) OBL,FACW,or FAC u.I 1. Rota milkman(NOC(ka roan) I/ Irolel FAC Pmrolance bode:worksheet 2. I Tolr%Cover a: Mutlplybr.2 .3. OBL Species a 1 o 2 Cesar FACU Spades x4• V Hart&ratan,(Plot Sin 320*') UPL Species x5 Q Charm arvens*(Canet m Y 5 FACU Column Totals: (A) (B) thiste) I— Caner qx(sedge species) 10 FACW Prevalence Index•ad• H MC Q G. Juncos sp.(rush species) 6 F� Ny roplr uo Vegetation Indicators: 4. Aster's.(Aster sp.) S FAG 5. Fedrvca sp.(brew grass sp.) 10 FAC 0 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation B. Lonum sp.(rye grass sp.) 25 FACU ® Dominance Test is a 50% 7. Rzeanslus Kola Dal 5 FACW 0 Prevalence Index is 53.0' buttercup) 8. Rumex crispus(curly dock) 6 FAC 0 Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) 10. Epriaetum•nerse(ronmon 5 FAC 0 Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' horsetail) 11. Agraetis sp.(bentgwes sp.) ,20 FAC 0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation(Explain) • 12. Phutarta anindinleee(toed 5 FACW i'br icatons of hydric sea and wetland hydrology must be present,unless nnarygms) disturbed or problematic. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum(Rot Siva 32011') 1. I 2. . 'I•Tobel Cover %Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks:The earned species thwghoul the Paoli area are runndrve gasses ranging hues FPCW-FPCU however the only FACW grass is P/tdals audnerea which is NOT FPCW in the Puget Loi/ads and is ptmaly present duets the dislubed sal conditions Localized dfleremes tnvegdelron mthin 20 led d the sample plot are tiled those(220 square FeerI.Al Cover and Juncos are FACW pa Reed et 8 1989 and the USDA for Region IX,2011.Howeve,these spaces land the*et shies observes)old net here any otservade adeptaliers necessary,even under magnification to be to prorated vegetation in saturated soil conditions. Modified US Army Caps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast-Versions 2.0 August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 135 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 • A • D C) I SOIL Sampling Pzintr SP3 = Profile Description:(Describe to the depth needed to doct next the hMCMor on COMM the absence of Indicatory E Matra Redox Features Depth Cda(Ndsl) Y Color(Moist) Y Type' i Loo` Torture i Remarks , m (behest Z 1.12 10YR 319 o WA 0 Dark browm moist,slightly sly,well ' • sated'angular to subanculer,pony 1 waded,medium sand.Sandy Morn 12-30 10YR d2 0 NM 0 Light brownish way.moist slightly silty,well sated angular to W subenguhr,poorly waded medium sand Sandy team m Type_C=ConcentreHon,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Melnx,CSoCovered or Coated Sand Grains. `LOCotbn:PLePore Liens McMebix —I c Soil indicators:(Applicable to all LRR5,unless NhenMw noted.) Indlcetors fan PrObNmelc Nyddc Bole' Hislosol(All 0 Sandy Redox(S5) 0 2 cm Muck(A10) r 0 Histic Epipedon(A2) 0 Stripped Matrix(Se) 0 Red Parent Material(TF2) , D O Black Histie(A3) 0 Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) 0 Very Shalom Dark Surface y Z 0 Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) 0 Loamy Glayed Matrix(F2) p Other(Explain in Remarks) O Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) 0 Depleted Matrix(F9) Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ' CZI 0 Thick Dark Surface(Al2) 0 Radon Dark Surface(FB) wetland hydrology must be present, 0 Sandy Mucky Mineral(SI) 0 Depleted Dark Surface(FT) unless disturbed or problematic. 0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix(54) 0 Radon Depressions(F8) tZi Restrictive Layer of present): m Type: Mythic Soil Present? Yes 0 No El Depth(inches) )- Remarks: Sand becomes more cohesive at depth. Test pit dug to 24';ONrlNd Model C soil sampler extended from 24—30'. Minor oxidation at 20—22'. Z m • a HYDROLOGY 1 Wetland Hydrology Indicators: O Prime Indicators(minimum of me_required.check all that apply) Secondary Indicates(2 or more required) O Surface Water(Al) 0 Water-Slaked Leaves(89)(except MLRA 0 Weer•Stained Leaves(89)(PLRA 1,2,4A, Z 0 High Water Table(A2) 1,2,4A,and4B) 43) O Saturation(AS) 0 Salt Crust(B11) 0 Drainage Patterns(610) 0 Water Marks(81) 0 Aquatic Invertebrates(813) 0 Dry-Season Water Table(C2) 77 0 Sediment Deposits(82) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(CI) 0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery 0 Drift Deposits(82) 0 Oxidized Rhiaospheres along Living C9) 1 0 Algal Mat or Crust(84) Roots(C3) 6 Geomorphic Position(02) 0 Iron Deposits(BS) 0 Presence or Reduced Iron(C4) 0 Shallow Aquitard(D3) O Surface Soil Cracks(BB) 0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils 0 FAC-Neutral Test(D5) • 3 0 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C8) 0 Raised Ant Mounds(DO)(LRR A) B1 O Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 0 Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)(LRR 0 Frost-Heave Hummocks(07) (88) A) , D Other Ex•tein in Remarks ' Field ObserVegOls _ Surface Water Present Yes• No{• Da•h inches — I Water Table Present? Y..D No Depth(inches) ■ Wetland Hydrology Present? vesD Na® Saturation Present? Ynt No Dopthtinches) includes ca•'liar gin• Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Well logs from the Department of Ecology,air photographs from Google Earth Professional.Jefferson County GIS.and WDFW SNmonSeape. Remarks: Modified US Army Caps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast—Version 2.0 August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 136 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA JeffersonCounty Parcel Number: 921094026 • h E O Li— WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Protect/Site Moons M oga nen P per y C ylCounly Jeffers on son Cou rely Sampling Date 8mB2011 ■ F Applicant/Om er Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Stab WA Sampling Point SPA Q krvestigator(s) Shiva Neugebeuer and Shwa Beauombi Section,Township,Range SE Qtr See 9,TN 29N,R 1E I.IJ Londrorm(hilslape,terrace,etc) Tartan Leval Role(concave.convex,none) Curtsey* Skew(%) 7.5% Z Subeg on(LRR) LRRA Lettvde 48015993' Longitude 422.680793' Datum WGSe4 Soil Map Unit Narita EvereWSan Juan gravely sandy Nam NWI Clasmfieation PEMA J Are climatic/hyddogic conditions on the sb typist'bruda tan*of year?Yee No0(If no,explain in remelts) L1J Are Vegehtion0,Soil 0,or Hydrology 0 significantly disturbed? Are Normal Circumstance present?Yes® No0 Are e Vegetation°,Soil 0,or Hydrology 0 naturally problematic? (If needed.explain arty answers in remarks) SUMMARY OF FiNDINGS—Math site map shown r sampling point locations,transacts,important features,etc. W Wetland Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No 0 r Gi Hydic Soil Present? Yee 0 No® Is the Sampled Area = Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No Within a Wetland? Q Remarks: Ali ugh sigal property has beer hitlapay dslubed by dear cc/tree harvedrgahrdies and moacSlao to the suffice water tyddagyths(Moot erect —1 ':,`Rs ably to mote ddmnnaura or erg aellend tndrc or The tree havedlrghatyes have been cuomedm whey dl parcels m Voervrgae lance es r flee other pound dshabaces wooded wits egiO6ual atndtes Pfeil rs locale]n amid glare:mediate/channel vuh denary*southeast.A mamede drainage dhe has been co:deed in who is now a'modern dal ephemera d otnews*else int the stockpiled removed sods nipixlirg rated tannage In he end W VEGETATION-Use scientific names&plants. Tree Sarum(Plot sine:10 V) Absolute Dominant hocdor Dominance Test Worksheet %Cover Speoest Slaws 1 2. Number of Dominant Species That an (A) OBL,FACW or FAC: CO •Tahl Cow Percent of Dominant Species That Are (NB) SedinWShmb Stratum(Plot Sian 10 it) OBL,FACW.or FAC Iwi• 1. Rana retaken(Nooda row) 5 FAC Prevalence Index worksheet Z 2. Rubus untuus(being 5 FACU "Told%Cover or: Mottipy by: tP.l blackberry) 3. OBL Speeds x 1• Total Carer FACU Spades e4• = Herb Strohm(Plot See 10I�) UPI Species A5• 1. Cisium&Man(Canada 10 FACU Column Totals: (A) ON V thistle) Q 2 Coax sp(swigs opades) 8 FACW- Prevalence Index=B/A= 1■ FAC 3. Jumps sp.(rush species) 6 r FACW- II ydeophylic Vegetation Indicato : FAC -------- 4 4. Pleb*ererMincee(reed 5 FACW nnarygrass) 5. Poe sP.(bluayess op.) 16 FAC 0 Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. Murmur crrspoe(surly dock) S FAG 0 Dominance Test is>50% 7. Renrrntsbo Pads Oat 6 FACW 0 Prevalence index is a3.0' buttercup) 8. Eau/maw wrens*(common S FAC 0 Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting date in Remerks or __MRwSB on a separate sheet) 8. Agalr op(bernlgaes ap.) 10 FAC 0 Wed end Non-Vascular Plants' 10. Feature sp.(Fescue sp.) 20 FAO 0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation(Explain) '.ii 11. Locum sp.(ryegras sp.) 10 FACU 'Indicates of hydrk sot and wetland hydology mud be present unless disturbed at problemetk. 12, P/Num protons*(common 16 FAC timothy) 13. •Total Cover Wetland Woody Vine Strohm(Plot Sim 10`J) Prce unit?ation Yee® No0 1. •Tohl Cover %Bore Ground in Herb Strum Reaads:Tie dormant spates tlttegloul are dad,amen son-rave grasses raging bon FACW-FACU,home the only FACW grins is Phdn's augMnoceowhce is NOT FACW in the Puget LouAmds and is paned present de tome disturbed sod wrblirs Localized diereres in vegOelionwnhin 20 led of the sample psi Se listed Move 0.20 sawn feet) At Coen and bergs are FACW per Reed ee a,1938 and tte USDAkr Report l%,21011.However,these species(and the other spates observed ltd nil have try observable edoplehors necessary.den under magnification lobe he previed vegetation to saturated sal condlior. Modified US Army Carps of Engineers Western Mountains.Valleys.and Coast-Version 2.0 • • August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report 137 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 TIN —I So e, SOIL Semplin•Pant:6P4 = Pronnle Description:(Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators) 3 Matrb Redox Feature Depth Co lor(Mast) % Color(Moist) % Type' Lace Tura Remarks T (Whirs) Z 0-7 10YR 34 0 NIA 0 Dark brown.moist sli ynty a t%well sorted angular to subanguler,poorly ••i graded,medium send.Sandy I . 7-24 10YR Y2 0 WA 0 Light brownish gray,moist slightly ally,well sorted.angular to CCP subanguir,poorly graded,medium sand.Sandy loam. 's M I lupe:C•Concmtraion,D•Deplebon,RM•Reduced Matrix,CS•Coveredor Coated Sand Grains. `Loc•ioa:PL•Pore Liana M•Mahix •T Hyaic 8ol)lndIcKOn:(Appllabi Mall LRRS,Whitt OthndN noted.) Irdotors for Problematic Hydrlc Sole' I la Histosd(Al) O Sandy Redox(Se) 0 2 cm Muck(A10) O Hisao Epipedon(A2) 0 Stripped Matrix(SB) 0 Red Parent Material(TF2) a O Black Hists(A3) 0 Loamy Mucky Mineral(Fl)(except MLRA 1) 0 Very Shallow Dark Surface 2 0 Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) 0 Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) 13 Other(Explain in Remarks) O Depleted Below Dark Surface(All) 0 Depleted Matrix(F3) Indicators of hydrophytie vegetation and ' p O Thick Dark Surface(Al2) 0 Redox Dark Surface(Fe) wetland hydrology must be present O Sandy Mucky Mineral(SI) 0 Depleted Dark Surface(F7) unless disturbed or problematic. O Sandy Greyed Matrix(S4) 0 Radek Depreaslens(F8) Q Restrictive Layer(If present): T Type: Hyddc Soil Present? Yes 0 No® Depth(Inches) r— • • 2 rn a HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrologylrldiaators: 0 Prime Indicet0rs minimum of one >•ulred check all that••• Seconda Indicates 2 a more • bed O Surface Water(AI) • Wata•Stained Leaves(89)(except MLRA • Water-Stained Leaves 189)(•S.RA 1,2,4A, 2 0 High Water Table(A2) 1,2,4A,end4B) 45) O Saturation(A3) 0 Salt Crust(811) 0 Drainage Patterns(B10) 0 Water Marks(61) 0 Aquatic Invertebrates(813) 0 Dry-Season Water Table(02) TI O Sediment Deposits(B2) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(CI) 0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery 0 0 Drift Deposits(B2) 0 Oxidized Rhizosphern along Living C8) 0 Algal Mat or Crust(84) Roots(C3) Li Geomorphic Position(02) SJ 0 Iron Deposits(B3) 0 Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Shallow Aquitard(03) O Surface Soil Creche(8B) 0 Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils FAC-Neutral Test(05) E 0 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C8) ❑ Raised Ant Mounds(DO)(LRR A) (67) (/J 0 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 0 Stu Med or Stressed Plants(01)(LRR 0 Frost-Have Hummocks(07) (88) A • Other Ex•lain in Remarks) Field Observations _1571-01 k '= 111 Wetland Hydrology Present? YasD No0 Sstuaton Present? Yn0 No Depth(Inches) includes ca•liar kin• Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos.previous inspections),If available: Well logs from the Department of Ecology,air photographs from Goodie Earth Professional,Jefferson County GIS.and WDFW Salmonscape. Remarks: -_-- --- Modified US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast-Version 2.0 August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 138 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA JeffersonCounty Parcel Number: 921094026 CC O LL WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast Region Project/Sib Mooney/Rogerson Properly City/County Jefferson Canty Sampling Date 5/08/2011 PypticantOwner Marc Meuney and Lynne Rogerson Stab WA Sampling Paint SP5 Investigators) Steve Neugsbeuer end Steve Bwuwniri Section,Township,Range SE Qtr Sec 9,TN 29N,R 1E LaJ Landrorm(hilecpe,tome,,etc) Tenn Local Relief(concave,convex,none) Concave Slope(%) 7.5% Subagion(LRR) LRRA Latitude 48.016993' Losrgtude -122.580793' Datum WOS84 Sot Map Unit Name Everett/San Juan gravely sandy loam N WI Clesekkation PEMA arse climatic/hydrologic conditions on ere sib typical lor this time of year?Vn® NoO Of no,explain in remarks) Y.1 Are Vegetation°.Soil°,or Hydrology 0 significantly disturbed? Are Nomaal Circumstances'present?Ves® NoD Are Vegeteton°,Soil°,or Hydrology 0 naturally problematic? (If needed,e>pbn any ansvmsir',marks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS-Attach site show ..s• •I • ••rut locations transacts Ina • • features etc. Wetland Vegetation Present? Yes® No 0 Cl Hydrie Soil Present? Yes❑ No® Fettle Sampled Ana within e wawa? YesO No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No® Q Remarks: Almugh sbtaa property has been Nei:mally(kg gbed ty clear as tree hugest mg acartles and moMcetiore to the surface weer lyddogy tars did not affect J SNP RCN In mdce ddenvdu,s or ary wetland Indust or The tree haveding aDulies have been conducted en virtu*dl parcels on Menovstme Island it have other gourd dsturbames associated with agicutuel atoares Area is located in erelcl glare meltwater the oath damage to the southeast.Amamade N.I drainage dash has been excavated in what is now a'modern der ephemeral darege ledge with the stook oiled removed soils mpactiry meat damage to the east VEGETATION-Use scientific names of Marts. Tree Stratum(Plot size:10R`) Pbsduse 'Dominant commit Dominance Test Worksheet: %COVer Sp•cresi Status 1 2. Number of Dominant Species That an (A) 3, OBL,FACW or FAC: 4. !Total Number of Dominant Species (8) 5. Across All Strata I- .Tdol Cover Percent of Dominant Species That Are (MB) SapirnIShrub Stratum(Plot Men 101.2) OBL,FACW,or FAC ILl 1. Ross nuMana Mooete row) 3 FAC Prevalence Index worksheet 2. Total%Gavotte: Multiply by 2 3. OBL Species x 1* = Total Conn FACU Spedn x 4* 6-6 Herb Stratum(Plot Size 10 k) UPL Species x5 1. Cesium ammo(Canada 4 FACU COMM Totes: (A) (e) thistle) FA. 2 Cares sp.(sedge species) 8 FACW- Prevalence Index.BIA. FAC Q 3. Porous sp.(rush species) 4 FW AC - Hyaraphyac Vegetation indicators: A 4. PAakna amndinew(reed 10 FACW =nor ms's) 5. Cbkmemlue(Canada 5 FACU 0 Rapid Test for Hydroptrytic Vegetation thistle) 8. Ranunculus spans(trooping 9 FACW 99 Dominance Test is>SO% buttercup) 7. Ag stis sp.(bengasssp.) 20 FAC O Prevalence Index is 03.0' B. lefeumsp.(ryagrass sp.) 20 FAIR! O Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting data in Remarks or ion a separate sheet) B. Rodeos sp(fasces sp.) 20 FAC ° Wetland Non-Vascular Plants' 10. _° Problematic Hydrophytle Vegetation(Explain) ' eroto Cover Woody Vine Stratum(Plot Size 10 k°) 1. 2. .Total Cesar %Bars Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks:The dominant spares throughout the study area ere non-rage grasses ranging ham FACW-FACU.Ammer Beaty FACW gss is Paatais awrdoaoeawhch is NOT TAM in the Puget Lowlands and Is primarily preserl due to the disturbed soil conditions LnaheddRereaes in vegetation within 20 fee of the sample plot welded eEve(320 cone feet).Al Carey end Janus are FACW per Reed el a,1%8 end the UTDAia Regan IX.2017.However,these species laid lhe one species observe4 Odra have any otsevatie edeptetiors necessary.even under magnrfcalon to are Or a'eoOed vegooion in saturated sal conddms Modified US Army Caps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys,and Coast-Version 2.0 August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Canpany Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 139 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 To —I -I Tr n SOIL Sampling Pant:SP5 ` _ Pret1e Description:(Dlsa to the depth needed to desumM the r or confirm the absence of Indicators) Moh Redo Features qqi DeW1 Color(Moist) % Color(Moist) % Type' Loo` Texture Remarks p T (Inches) { Z 0.15 10YR 3/3 o N/A 0 Dark brown,must,silty.well sorted angularto srbangular,poorly graded, —I fine sand.Sandy loam. 15-22 10YR 6/2 p N/A 0 Light brownish gray.moist,slightly silty,well sorted,angular to CO subangular,poorly gold,and rand. Sandy loam. T I 'Type:C=COMentretian,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Metriz CS:Covered or Coated Sand Grains_ `Location:Pl:Pore Lining,M•Netrix —I Hynic Soil Indicators:(Applicable to all LRRS,unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydrle Sall? I- 0 Hislosd(Al) 0 Sandy Rados(55) 0 2 can Muck(A10) 0 Histic Eppedon(A2) 0 Stripped Matrix(55) 0 Red Parent Material(TF2) a O Black Histic(A3) 0 Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1)(except MLRA 1) 0 Very Shallow Dark Surface 2 I 0 Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) 0 Loamy Greyed Matrix(F2) 0 Other(Explain in Remarks) 0 Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) 0 Depleted Matrix(F3) Indcetors of hydrophybe vegetation and p O Thick Dark Surface(Al2) 0 Rectos Dark Surface(Fe) wetland hydrology must be present, O Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) 0 Depleted Dark Surface(F7) unless disturbed or problematic. ,__[] Sandy Gleyed Metro(S4) 0 Redox Depressions(F8) a/ II Restrictive Layer(If present): Typ• Hyddc Soil Present? Yes 0 No 0 IT Depth(inches) I— High amount of manta material(basalt and/or•ndesite). Very minor unsaturated zone preferential low was noted at the bottom of the lest pit. 2 rn p HYDROLOGY —I Wetland Hydrology Indicators: C ' Primary Indicators(minimum of one required,check all that apply) Secondary Indicates(2 or more requked) O Surface Water(Al) 0 Water-Stained Lesvos(BD)(except MLRA 0 Water-Shined Leaves(85)IgLRA 1,2,4A, 2 . 0 High Water Table(A2) 1,2,4A,and 48) 411) O Saturation(A3) 0 Sall Crust(811) 0 Dminage Patterns(810) I 0 Water Marks(81) 0 Aquatic Invertebrates(813) 0 Dry-Season Water Table(C2) T O Sediment Deposits(82) El Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) 0 Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery 0 Drift Deposits(82) 0 Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living 0(CS) 0 Algal Mat or Crust(84) Roots(C3) Geomorphic Position(D2) O Iron Deposits(87) Cl Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) 0 Shallow Aquitard(D3) I 0 Surface Soil Cracks(88) 0 Resent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils 0 FAC-Neutral Test(05) O Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (CB) 0 Raised Ant Mounds(06)(LRR A) 7) Cn 0 Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface 0 Stunted or Stressed Plants(01)(LRR 0 Frost.Have Hummocks(D7) (88) A) 0 Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observation _ Surface Water Present Yes• Nod De.h inches ' Water Table Present? Yes• No cr De. inches Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes0 No0 Saturation Present? Yes a No12:1 Depth(inches) (includes capillary Mega) Describe Recorded Date(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Well logs from the Department of Ecology,air photographs from Going!'Earth Professional,Jefferson County GIS,end WDFW SalmonScape. Remarks: Ratified US Army Caps of Engineers Western Mountains,Valleys.and Coast-Version 2.0 August 25,2011 Copyright®2011 SNR Company 140 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number 921094026 a a x CL0 I- 0 C.) I W C] t— t— a ATTACHMENT C - PHOTOGRAPHS August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson I 141 Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number: 921094026 $ a —i . ., v , ` 1 • , 1 +te f 3 ! .F` v 2 wh � " P ,�4 t.�� �`"�'!'v �� ```„�1 rr"y Kt,;y. �r ( , ' _„�il'1� '�I� lt�"'S�IhG -�i1 a nrr. ��".\,!4 S�Y.A A•- 14 !! ,1'..r .pO'1° ryt�� lCa 1 = rye 4 ` � 1 � .... .— `� ,�I .rte! i;;� cn } ♦..r T rrp\ �"' e. \: •\` .04 `4 4. .. ... Culvert draining Roadside Ditch Storm Water under Baldwin Road to the West onto Subject Property . yJ r.,,, -: i 41lV. , Ji l t(, �. . y t i- 'Co A ,Pyy. R 3.• • ' - . { \ ' Manmade Pond on the Young Property also serves as a Stormwater Detention Pond August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 142 I Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 CO, O- at CC • CL • CW x C., • • I- I- Looking Southeast near"Compost Mound" • • • t t,. Looking South with"Compost Mound"on left(East) August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company • Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report l 143 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun P-rcel Number: 921094026 • \ r z L O y co iWt ■ Sample Plot 3 • • •4 W 3F F ~ ~ • k �� 'r,. Solution Cavity in Bluff Face along Eastern Property Line August 25,2011 Copyright 0 2011 SNR Company 144 Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number 921094026 y d Q CC C7 O I- Q CL LLI 1 _ . yam`..1'Y" .r U. }Z,'S-tom,•,,, ,4 ..• -,00-,00 ' � '" �= .' Q , -a.a, s4 a4' ,...fir'.. -, 'r' 'y ft- Looking Northeast along Eastern Property Line • Q + r�+ K it 400 a 'a Vic. Looking Southeast along Eastern Property Line August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report I 145 Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson County Parcel Number: 921094026 C) e m `�' _ - -I v cT) A r -.j'q�• - Z c l�.f .n►T �f� M� f _ , s P Looking Southwest at Bluff Face along Eastern Property Line ,ter.... c p'v . ."f k' la"gtr e. P`. w.. ..� -w yy �� ;iii _ � .4SQY T°�`�.• —'- '' Looking West at Bluff Face along Eastern Property Line August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company 146 Wetland Identification and Delineation and Stream Reconnaissance Report Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson Nordland,WA Jefferson Coun Parcel Number: 921094026 aC i. H a. ., ti • cm • 0 l- a i x CL r '°yr~ '.r. a. per.. Y j — Q . �Y p_nirR'Q.'. •' 4J Looking West at Bluff Face along Eastern Property Line • ... ISM, . 1 0 ygZ Y^ {i' 1 -t- ; Cry ' - c + ' I. r Looking Northwest at Bluff Face along Eastern Property Line August 25,2011 Copyright©2011 SNR Company LAND SURVEYING LARK. 935 Aoilh Fifth Avenue • PO Mt 2199 MAPPING /{ LAND Sequin?. Washington 98382 DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING s. Office (360) 681-2161 • Fay (360) 683-5310 CONSIRi CTION MANAGEMENT OFFICE Toll Free l-888-681-2161 • 1-mail:info @clarkland.cont LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Mr. Terry McHugh Date: January 7, 2014 John L. Scott Re: SUB 12-00011 MLA 12-00141 2219 West Sims Way ■ Port Townsend, Washington 98368 Mauney/Rogerson Trust Short Plat Enclosed are the following items: Copies Date Description 1 1/07/14 Mylar copy of final short plat, sheets 1-3 _ 6 1/07/14 Paper copies of final short plat,sheets 1-3 Remarks: For signatures and recording. Copies to: Signed 411111P • J. 9re Bartron k4' N moo. JEFFERSON COUNTY �} DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT `4 621 4a5n0 Street• Port Townsend Washington 98368 , 'SOS www. ojeffer • .wa.0 /com Fax '�.�r�,T��'-� www.co.jefferson.wa.ttsh�mmdevelopment a (0g/'- " Master Permit Application MLA: i. (5 _ H Project Description(include separate sheets as necessary):. 3 \.04---4-- ('La„A- - 3 `A `- rk L5. l/vJ` 3 €v. f'et,u c.eiLl, Tax Parcel Number: 01 2\- O LI L\ -0 2 L, Property Size: 3 cf ± Q-c-S (acres/eksk A4 / Site Address and/or Directions to Property: t l t v pp1, /zt,�W tv) (Zv, _4— �tS ,eIZ � 'f2-(A_ • f✓14 �rJt.JS� � SS , IJJa--.-1.LtoA4v"VA--1 % Property Owner(s)of Record: 1- ' 'V ! Pti?r to v (LZ J. •J. 4-•-v S E Telephone: 'i&O " 3$�- 5032- Fax: r-; email: Mailing Address: 2-133 OAK_ 12-'a, O -T (Jo r1Lock- v✓A- 9 55 33'1 Applicant/Agent(if different from owner): Te -4-1 vq c i4 1U Telephone: 3 7 Li- LAS-16 Fax: '3 bc - rlf t 4'v email: 4' c l.(d u Iyrr•7■ CC 1,-4 Mailing Address: O. 0 fDO - t\uk\ lo.'r T-0L,)/.3t'v. . 10J.,- g.9 3(3?) What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies ❑Building ❑ Critical Areas Stewardship Plan ❑ Demolition Permit ❑Variance(Misoorr, ' - • ' • ❑Single Family ❑Garage Attached/Detached ❑ Conditional Use=[¢(: , 1 rrf ' ry r,_ r ❑ Manufactured Home ❑ Modular ❑ Discretionary'"4"t .�.-t •�' w: ■ "'Z I ❑ Commercial* ❑Special Use Esse tial Public Facilities)" ❑ Change of Use ❑ Boundary Lin AdiuStment ❑ Address ❑ Road Approach 10'Short Plat" 1', I vi I. JUN 1 9 2012 ❑ Home Business ❑Cottage Industry ❑ Binding Site plan" ❑ Propane ❑ Long Plat" � J L' Jl ❑Sign ❑ Planned Rural Resi�l8ntlat-7751 Amen.ments" ❑Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis ❑ Plat Vacation/Alte�, gn '..7':'.,n . v n , ❑Stormwater Management ❑ Shoreline Master ph 4:•-••• - . •,... ❑ Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)• ❑ Shoreline Management Substantial Development" ❑Temporary Use ❑Shoreline Management Variance ❑Wireless Telecommunication* ❑ Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑ Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium ❑Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment May require a Pre-Application Conference ❑Tree Vegetation Request "Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local, state or federal permits required for this proposal, if known: DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate "re rv-1 MC I-vocg " to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE ;_. l' Date: -' I i _ / --_ By signing this application form,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his,her or its knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attomey's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later pections. Sta Iccess and right of entry will be assumed unless the applicant info s the unty in writing at the time of the application th fe or he-.C.. -wad ' or ice. / Signature: - Date: 2 Z 4 Z C f li The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential lake"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate th ESA. Any indi ' al,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your actionls)even if you are in complia ith the Jeffe County development code.ThaApplieent acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-transferable responsib'• d n nd ing with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaime and si s and dates it below. Signature: :-------- — Date: 2. 2'i ,2.1-)I 2, G:\PetmitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\Master Permit Application 529-08.doc 1 1 • 4� ON coo JEFFERSON COUNTY z4.ew� �� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (DCD) 9SHI NOc-O 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 Jefferson County Code Interpretation Date: January 31, 2012 Issued by: Jefferson County DCD Planning Manager/UDC Administrator Affected: All properties located on Marrowstone Island Subject: Clarification of JCC 18.22.130(8)(b)—Moratorium of Subdivisions on Marrowstone Island Summary of Issue This request for a Code Interpretation was initiated by a January 3,2012 letter from the law firm of Gendler&Mann. The letter was accompanied by the enacted fee for a Code Interpretation and fulfills the preconditions for a Code Interpretation found in JCC §18.40.360. The letter referred to a specific parcel located on Marrowstone Island and within unincorporated Jefferson County(APN 921-094-026)but also asked the following more general question: JCC 18.22.(8)(b)(i)established a moratorium on the subdivision of land on Marrowstone Island"until such time as public water is available." Because public water is now available to Marrowstone Island is the moratorium still in effect? In its entirety the JCC18.22.130(8)(b)(i)reads: Marrowstone Island Subdivision Moratorium. Due to documented seawater intrusion on Marrowstone Island and the existence of undeveloped lots of record,Jefferson County has imposed a moratorium on additional land divisions on the island until such time as public water is available or it is demonstrated through the well monitoring program that groundwater quality is not degrading due to seawater intrusion. Through this Code Interpretation the County finds it can only address the more general question. The letter from Gendler&Mann describes neither the specific circumstances applicable to APN 921- 094-026 nor the land use development plans, if any,that might be impacted by a particular conclusion that this Code Interpretation might reach. Therefore the County can only answer the general question posed. FINAL-MLAI2-00006-Marrowstone Saba moon Moratorium Public Water Page lot 4 Code Interpretation Process In accordance with Article VI, Chapter 18.40 of the Unified Development Code(UDC),Jefferson County Code(JCC 18.40.350)this interpretation of the Unified Development Code is intended to clarify conflicting or ambiguous wording, interpret proper classifications of a use, or interpret scope or intent. The"Factors for Consideration", as identified in JCC 18.40.360(4)and listed below, were considered in making this UDC interpretation, including applicable goals and policies of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan: (a) The applicable provisions of this code, including its purpose and context; (b) The implications of the interpretation for development within the county as a whole, including the precedent the interpretation will set for other applicants; and (c) Consistency with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and other relevant ordinances and policies. Applicable Provisions Applicable provisions of the Jefferson County UDC include: • Article III of Chapter 18.22 JCC—Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas • Chapter 18.35 JCC—Land Divisions Implications The implications of this interpretation include: • Possible increased population and residential density and development on Marrowstone Island • Possible increased water usage within the Jefferson County PUD #1 Quimper Water System Consistency This interpretation continues to allow for development on Marrowstone Island that is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, including Goal ENG 3.0 and Policies ENP 3.1 through ENP 3.5.2. Background & Analysis: The Unified Development Code(UDC)was adopted December 18, 2000(effective January 16, 2001). The Shine Community Action Council and the Olympic Environmental Council appealed the UDC on the grounds that it did not provide sufficient protection from seawater intrusion. The Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board(WWGMHB)upheld the appeal and ordered Jefferson County to designate seawater intrusion areas and adopt protection standards to prevent aquifer degradation by seawater intrusion. Jefferson County amended the UDC and adopted the Coastal Seawater Intrusion Policy to comply with the Hearings Board ruling. In December 2002, the WWGMHB ruled the amended UDC and Coastal Seawater Intrusion Policy were not sufficient in protecting aquifers. The WWGMHB identified Marrowstone Island as an area needing additional protections for groundwater quality and ordered Jefferson County to adopt more stringent protection standards or a development moratorium on projects using groundwater. FINAL-MLA72-06006-Marovstone Subdivision Moreton=Public Water Page 2of 4 The Jefferson County PUD #1 formed a Local Utility District to provide public water to Marrowstone Island. The development of a public water supply to deliver water to Marrowstone Island met the requirements of the hearings board order by protecting aquifer quality from further degradation by seawater intrusion. On February 18,2003 the Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners approved Resolution 13-03 (Establishing a Policy Regarding Public Water Supply for Marrowstone Island). Point 2 of the resolution requires all new development requiring potable water on Marrowstone Island permitted by Jefferson County to use the public water supply source. The Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance 03-0303-03 on March 3, 2003. This ordinance was the first time the Marrowstone subdivision moratorium became part of the UDC. Ordinance 08-0710-06 adopted on July 10,2006 includes language on the Marrowstone subdivision moratorium as it continues to exist currently. On May 3, 2005 the Jefferson County PUD#1 applied for a Conditional Administrative Use Permit to extend a public water system and a Shoreline Conditional Use Permit for placing waterlines and associated appurtenances within shoreline jurisdiction. This permit was approved on November 20, 2006. This review was subject to the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). The SEPA Environmental checklist completed by James Parker,Manager of PUD#1, submitted on June 30, 2006, indicates the Washington State Department of Health approved the water line extension and water service area to include Marrowstone Island as part of the Jefferson County PUD Waster System Plan,2005. Code Interpretation: Effective February 1,2012, Jefferson County will require applicants for subdivisions on Marrowstone Island to demonstrate as a precondition to approval of their application by the County that all lots within the proposed subdivision will be connected to a public water system for their supply of potable water. Consistent with Chapter 18.35 JCC and consistent with Resolution 13-03, the parcels within the subdivision shall have public water available for their potable water prior to final plat approval. In accordance with JCC 18.22.130(8)(b)(i) and Resolution 13-03, Jefferson County cannot approve a subdivision on Marrowstone Island where the lots within the subdivision are not connected to a public water system for their supply of potable water. Applicability: In accordance with JCC 18.40.380,this code interpretation will remain in effect unless and until the administrator formally rescinds this Code Interpretation or the Jefferson County Code is formally amended(as per JCC 18.45.090)to supersede this interpretation. This interpretation may be enforced in the same manner that any provision of the code is enforced. This Code Interpretation reaches no conclusion or decision with respect to what future land use development would or would not be authorized or permitted by the County upon APN 921-094-026. FINAL-MLA12-00006-Marrowstone Subdrdsion Maralaium Public Water Page 3of 4 Instead it creates a rule of general applicability applicable to any parcel located on Marrowstone Island. Appeal: As outlined in JCC 18.40.390, a code interpretation may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner within fourteen(14)calendar days of the decision using the process for appeals of Type II permit decisions as set forth in JCC 18.40.330. Dated this 31st day of January, 2012. t(31I'Lat'L acie Hoskins,Interim DCD Director/P_anning Manager/UDC Administrator Attached: Resolution No. 13-03 Ordinance 03-0303-03 Comprehensive Plan Goal ENG 3.0 and policies 06-30-2006 PUD Environmental Checklist Ordinance 08-0710-06 excerpt as attached FINAL-MLA12-00006-Marrowstone Subdi sionMo,atonam Public Water Page 4of 4 yr v. oC•l.!-vr • er! ) STATE OF WASHINGTON County of Jefferson In the matter of a Establishing a Policy RESOLUTION NO. 13-03 Regarding Public Water Supply for Marrowstone Island WHEREAS,the Board of County Commissioners for Jefferson County, Washington (the BOCC), in their role as the legislature for Jefferson County makes the following findings. WHEREAS,Jefferson County's Unified Development Code was adopted in December 2000; and WHEREAS,the Shine Community Action Council and Olympic Environmental Council appealed the UDC on grounds that it did not provide sufficient protection from seawater intrusion; and WHEREAS,the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board upheld the appeal by Shine Community Action Council and Olympic Environmental Council, and ordered Jefferson County to designate seawater intrusion areas and adopt protection standards to prevent aquifer degradation by seawater intrusion; and WHEREAS,Jefferson County amended the UDC and adopted the Coastal Seawater Intrusion Policy to comply with the Hearings Board ruling; and WHEREAS, in December,2002,the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board ruled that the amended UDC and Coastal Seawater Intrusion Policy was not sufficient in protecting aquifers; and WHEREAS in the order, the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board identified Marrowstone Island as an area needing additional protections for groundwater quality; and WHEREAS,regarding Marrowstone Island,the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board order requires Jefferson County within 90 days to adopt more stringent protection standards or a development moratorium using groundwater; and Resolution No. 13-03 re: Establishing a Policy regarding a Public Work Supply for Marrowstone Island WHEREAS, the Jefferson Comprehensive Plan includes Goal ENG 3.0 states, "Ensure a sustainable and safe water supply as a critical necessity for residential, economic, and environmental needs;" and WHEREAS,the Jefferson Comprehensive Plan policy ENP 13.5 states, "Encourage the use of community water systems to serve new shoreline development" which also applies to islands like Marrowstone Island; and WHEREAS,Action Item 8. in the Environment Chapter of the Jefferson Comprehensive Plan states that Jefferson County shall, "Work with purveyors to promote the use of unaffected upland water sources and other alternative supplies,where appropriate, to supply new and existing development in affected areas; and WHEREAS, the Jefferson Comprehensive Plan policy ENP 3.3 states, "Preserve and protect both existing and future water supplies, and encourage activities which utilize alternative water sources that are compatible with environmental protection, in accordance with state and federal laws regulating alternative water uses;"and WHEREAS,the Jefferson Comprehensive Plan Utility Policy UTP 5.1 states. "The creation and the extension of public water supply systems outside Urban Growth Areas shall be consistent with the rural densities specific in the Land Use Element, and shall be financed entirely by the benefited properties and not the general rate payer;"and WHEREAS,the Jefferson Comprehensive Plan Utility Policy UTP 5.6 states, "Routinely review the Critical Areas Ordinance and current data to identify and improve processes that will reduce the risk of salt water intrusion;"and WHEREAS,the Jefferson Comprehensive Plan Utility Policy UTP 5.8 states, "Work with purveyors to promote the use of unaffected upland water sources and other alternative supplies, where appropriate,to supply new and existing development in affected areas;" and WHEREAS, the State Department of Ecology interprets existing water law to indicate that use of a rainwater catchments system to provide drinking water for a residence requires a surface water right for appropriation of that water; and WHEREAS, currently applications for surface water rights generally take more than 10 years before they are processed, and therefore dependence on rainwater collection systems is not a viable solution for development; and Page 2 Resolution No. 13-03 re: Establishing a Policy regarding a Public Work Supply for Marrowstone Island WHEREAS,other possible alternative water supplies include desalination and trucking water,both of which are energy intensive and expensive, and thus conflict with other environmental objectives; and WHEREAS,the Jefferson County PUD#1 has been petitioned to form a Local Utility District providing public water supply to Marrowstone Island; and WHEREAS,the Jefferson County PUD#1 sent out an initial survey to get feedback on a proposed public water system; and WHEREAS,based on the survey,the Jefferson County PUD will be following the requirements of RCW 35.44.090 and RCW 54.16.140; and WHEREAS,with the development of a public water supply system to deliver water to Marrowstone Island the County will meet the requirement of the hearings board order by protecting aquifer quality from further degradation by seawater intrusion through the development impacts regulated by Jefferson County under the Growth Management Act. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Jefferson County Commissioners that Jefferson County: 1. Supports the formation of a rural public water supply system consistent with the rural densities as identified in UTP 5.1 for Marrowstone Island as the long-term solution for water quality degradation caused by seawater intrusion on Marrowstone Island. 2. Shall require all new development requiring potable water on Marrowstone Island permitted by Jefferson County to use the public water supply source. 3. States that actions undertaken by it in cooperation with the Public Utility District No.1 of Jefferson County from this point should reflect that long-term goal for providing public water to Marrowstone Island. 4. Recognizes that any action by the County or other agencies that could prevent, limit or restrict the development of public water on Marrowstone Island shall be and is in conflict with this resolution. 5. In order that public health and environmental quality are protected,urges the cooperation of local and state agencies so that the public water supply should be approved within approximately 18-24 months from the date of this resolution. Page 3 Resolution No. 13-03 re: Establishing a Policy regarding a Public Work Supply for Marrowstone Island 6. Acknowledges that failing to meet the objective of providing public water to Marrowstone Island within a reasonable timeframe could subject Jefferson County to further review by and or be in conflict with the two Orders from the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board. 7. Acknowledges that although compliance with the Hearings Board orders may represent an unfunded mandate, Jefferson County intends to comply to the best of the County's ability. JEFFERSON COUNTY Y r°w BOARD OF COMMISSIONER SEAL: . * rt*Z• , fs ili `. .n Dan Titterness, Ch.it H ATTEST �+ . : a ', Iif� ��/ . a. ' _-- • gting era, V/ 9 er v Oy ,,, ,,,1, ,�� Wendi H. Lorna L. Delaney, CMC Wrinkle,Member Clerk of the Board APPROVED AS TO Ocil)ann.ot, a9A„,...„..,,)),..l Prosecuting Attorney Page 4 STATE OF WASHINGTON County of Jefferson AN ORDINANCE APPROVING INTERIM } OFFICIAL CONTROLS (DEVELOPMENT } REGULATIONS) FOR MARROWSTONE } Ordinance No. 03-0303-03 ISLAND PURSUANT TO RCW 36.70A.390 } WHEREAS, the Board of Jefferson County Commissioners ("the Board") has, as required by the Growth Management Act or"GMA," a state statute codified at Chapter 36.70A RCW, adopted a Comprehensive Plan ("the Plan") through and by Resolution No. 72-98 on August 28, 1998, and the Plan has been subsequently amended by certain Resolutions and Ordinances adopted or enacted by the County legislature; and WHEREAS, the Board has adopted, in its legislative capacity, development regulations that implement and are consistent with the Plan, specifically by adopting a document known as the Unified Development Code or"UDC,"which was effective in January 2001; and WHEREAS, the UDC was the subject of a timely appeal to the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board [or"WWGMHB"], said appeal alleging that the UDC was deficient for not properly classifying, designating and protecting certain "critical areas" more precisely known as areas that are at various levels of risk of seawater intrusion; and WHEREAS, the general allegation of that timely appeal was that groundwater sources in the unincorporated county were at risk of seawater intrusion and that such seawater intrusion represents a degradation or worsening of water quality in direct contravention of the GMA; and Ordinance No. 03-0303-03 re: Approving Interim Official Controls for Marrowstone Island WHEREAS, the appeal of the UDC as it relates to areas at risk of seawater intrusion has been the subject of two full-blown hearings before the WWGMHB, one in December 2001, another in October 2002; and WHEREAS, the WWGMHB determined the County was not GMA-compliant with respect to the allegations raised in the appeal regarding the designation and protection of areas at risk of seawater intrusion; and WHEREAS, Jefferson County, while receiving praise from the WWGMHB for its substantial success through adoption of additional and revised UDC provisions regarding the designation and protection of areas at risk of seawater intrusion, remains, according to the WWGMHB, out of compliance with the requirements of the GMA as they relate to areas at risk of seawater intrusion; and WHEREAS, the portion of the unincorporated County that contains the greatest concentration of areas at risk of seawater intrusion is Marrowstone Island; and WHEREAS, the WWGMHB has mandated in a Compliance Order dated December 5, 2002 that this County, among other items, take steps within 90 days of the date of that Compliance Order to prevent any additional seawater intrusion on Marrowstone Island, in other words to prevent any further degradation of groundwater quality or quantity on that island; and WHEREAS, the WWGMHB did not preclude the County from promulgating, if necessary, a moratorium on development proposals that rely on groundwater as proof of potable water until more stringent requirements on water usage are adopted by the County; and Page 2 03-0303-03 Ordinance No. re: Approving Interim Official Controls for Marrowstone Island WHEREAS, the 90 days permitted for action with respect to preventing further groundwater degradation on Marrowstone Island expire March 5, 2003; and WHEREAS, the County Commissioners sought limited public input by referring this matter(what proposals should be implemented and enacted to prevent additional seawater intrusion from occurring on Marrowstone Island)to the County's.Planning Commission, which, in turn, delegated the task of organizing a list of proposals to a subcommittee of the Planning Commission, a subcommittee that was so pressed for time that it met on a Sunday in February 2003; and WHEREAS, the subcommittee of the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission did an excellent job in quickly providing the elected County legislators with a list of action items that could be enacted or adopted to satisfy the requirement of the WWGMHB that "additional seawater intrusion" on Marrowstone Island be abated; and WHEREAS, the elected County legislators heard the proposals for Marrowstone Island from the Planning Commission and other County staff members on February 24, 2003 only days before the 90 day period for action responsive to the WWGMHB mandate expired; and WHEREAS, there is now insufficient time for the public hearing to occur before adoption of this Ordinance if the County is to comply with the 90-day deadline laid out in the December 2002 Compliance Order issued by the WWGMHB; and WHEREAS, the "line-in, line-out" attachments made part of this Ordinance constitute the County's compliance with the 90-day mandates laid out in the Compliance Order of the WWGMHB from December 2002; and Page 3 Ordinance No. 03-0303-03 re: Approving Interim Official Controls for Marrowstone Island WHEREAS, The Growth Management Act, specifically RCW 36.70A.390, permits this Board, as the legislature for the relevant local government, the municipal corporation known as Jefferson County, to adopt a moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance or interim official control; and WHEREAS, The process for interim measures available able to this Board pursuant to Section 390 of the GMA allows the adoption of an interim measure as long as a public hearing before the Board occurs within 60 days measured from the date the interim measure is enacted; and WHEREAS, the Board, as the elected County legislators, now wish to invoke and utilize the powers granted to them by Section 390 of the GMA. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT ORDAINED AS FOLLOWS: Section One: The changes to the Unified Development Code (or"UDC") reflected in Exhibit "A"attached hereto are made effective as of the date this Ordinance is adopted by the Board of County Commissioners and shall be effective for six months from that date of adoption. APPROVED AND SIGNED this 3rd day of March, 2003. JEFFERSON COUNTY SEAL BO ' • • IMMISSIONERS 4/s r — ATTEST: Dan Tittemess, Chair ,,W/1 Lorna Delaney, CMC eCxl'n Huntingfo ' ember Clerk of the Board (Voted against) APPROVED AS T FORM Wendi H. Wrinkle, Member 0C(Ain,c4 3j3 �3 eputy Prosecuting Attorne Page 4 r 1_.l I, c. a. ...� _�JfJi 1rlxSwI�✓2'v_,it,-ft_ . UDC groundwater protection/seawater intrusion amendments In response to December 5, 2002 Compliance Order concerning Marrowstone Island March 3, 2003 Section 3 Land Use Districts 3.6 Overlay Districts 3.6.5 Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas. a. Classification.Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas are naturally susceptible due to the existence of permeable soils or a seawater wedge in coastline aquifers. Certain overlying land uses can lead to water quality and/or quantity degradation. The following classifications define Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas. (1) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. For the purposes of this section, unless otherwise determined by preparation of an Aquifer Recharge Area Report authorized under this section, the following geologic units, as identified from available State of Washington Department of Natural Resources geologic mapping, define Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas for east Jefferson County: i. Alluvial fans (Ha), ii. Artificial fill (1-Ix), iii. Beach sand &gravel (Hb), iv. Dune sand (Hd), v. Flood plain alluvium (Hf), vi. Vashon recessional outwash in deltas and alluvial fans (Vrd), vii. Vashon recessional outwash in meltwater channels (Vro), viii. Vashon ice contact stratified drift (Vi), ix. Vashon ablation till (Vat), x. Vashon advance outwash (Vao), xi. Whidbey formation (Pw), and xii. Pre-Vashon stratified drift (Py). (2) Those areas meeting the requirements of Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas (above) and which are overlain by the following land uses as identified in this Code are subject to the provisions of the protection standards in this Section: i. All Industrial Land Uses ii. All Commercial Uses iii. All Rural Residential Land Uses A. requiring a Discretionary Use or Conditional Use Permit or B. with nonconforming uses that would otherwise require a Discretionary Use or Conditional Use Permit iv. Unsewered Planned Rural Residential Developments v. Unsewered residential development with gross densities greater than one unit per acre (3) Special Aquifer Recharge Protection Areas include: i. Sole Source Aquifers designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in accordance with the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-523). UDC seawater intrusion amendment 3/3/03 2003 90-day compliance: Marrowstone Island Page 1 BOAR: COUNTY .400: ,_r) VERSION ii. Special protection areas designated by the Washington Department of Eco- logy under Chapter 173-200 WAC. iii. Wellhead Protection Areas determined in accordance with delineation methodologies specified by the Washington Department of Health under authority of Chapter 246-290 WAC. iv. Ground Water Management Areas designated by the Washington Department of Ecology in cooperation with local government under Chapter 173-100 WAC. (4) Seawater Intrusion Protection Zones (SIPZ) are aquifers and land overlying aquifers with some degree of vulnerability to seawater intrusion. SIPZ are defined either by proximity to marine shoreline or by proximity to groundwater sources that have demonstrated high chloride readings. All islands and land area within 1/4 mile of marine shorelines and associated aquifers together compose the coastal SIPZ. Additionally, areas within 1000 feet of a groundwater source with a history of chloride analyses above 100 milligrams per liter (mg/L) are categorized as either at risk (between 100 mg/L and 200 mg/L) or high risk (over 200 mg/L) SIPZ. Individual groundwater sources with a history of chloride analyses above 200 mg/L shall be considered "sea-salt water intrusion areas,"which are among the"sources or potential sources of contamination" listed in Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-160-171, implementing code for the Water Well Construction Act. The whole of Marrowstone Island will be designated a high risk SIPZ and a"sea-salt water intrusion area"per WAC 173-160-171 on December 31, 2004 or when public water is available to the Island, whichever is sooner. Jefferson County is actively working with partner agencies to establish a public water source on Marrowstone Island as a long-term solution to aquifer degradation due to seawater intrusion. In some cases, high chloride readings may be indicative of connate seawater(i.e., relic seawater in aquifers as opposed to active seawater intrusion). When best available science or a hydrogeologic assessment demonstrate that high chloride readings in a particular area are due to connate seawater,the area in question shall not be considered an at risk or high risk SIPZ. When the status of an area is in question, the UDC Administrator is responsible for making the determination based upon recommendation from County Department of Health and Human Services. b. Designation.Jefferson County shall prepare and exhibit dated Critical Aquifer Recharge Area maps which demonstrate the approximate distribution of the Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas, Special Aquifer Recharge Protection Areas, and Seawater Intrusion Protection Zones.The Critical Aquifer Recharge Area maps shall be periodically revised, modified, and updated to reflect additional information. c. Applicability. (1) The following land use activities are considered high impact land uses due to the probability and/or potential magnitude of their adverse effects on groundwater and shall be prohibited in Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas and Special Aquifer Recharge Protection Areas. In all other areas of the County outside of Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas and Special Aquifer Recharge Protection Areas,these activities shall require an Aquifer Recharge Area Report pursuant to this Section. i. Chemical manufacturing and reprocessing; ii. Creosote/asphalt manufacturing or treatment (except that asphalt batch plants may be permitted in Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas ONLY if such areas lie outside of Special Aquifer Recharge Protection Areas and ONLY if best management practices are implemented pursuant to sections 4.24.8d ad 6.17 of this Code and an accepted Aquifer Recharge Area Report); iii. Electroplating and metal coating activities; iv. Hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facilities; v. Petroleum product refinement and reprocessing; UDC seawater intrusion amendment 3/3/03 2003 90-day compliance: Marrowstone Island Page 2 30L ?_.: OF C✓:.N. ; �A"# n vF� v ADOPT__; VERSION vi. Underground storage tanks for petroleum products or other hazardous materials; vii. Recycling facilities as defined in this Code; viii. Solid waste landfills; ix. Waste piles as defined in Chapter 173-304 AC; x. Wood and wood products preserving; xi. Storage and primary electrical battery processing and reprocessing. (2) All other land uses shall be subject to the protection standards contained in this Section and mitigating conditions included with an Aquifer Recharge Area Report, • where applicable. (3) Seawater Intrusion Protection Zones. Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saitwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall)and the rate of groundwater withdrawals (primarily through wells). •- _ • _ _• o-_ ••-• - ._ __ _ __ • Jeffarcon County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. d. Protection Standards. (1) General.The following protection standards shall apply to land use activities in Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas and Special Aquifer Protection Areas, and when specified in Seawater Intrusion Protection Zones, unless mitigating conditions have been identified in a Critical Aquifer Recharge Report that has been prepared pursuant to this section. (2) Stormwater Disposal. Stormwater runoff shall be controlled and treated in accordance with best management practices and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin, as amended and the stormwater provisions contained in Section 6 of this Code. ii. To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within '/a mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. The Administrator will consider requests for exceptions to this policy on a case-by-case basis and may require a hydrogeologic assessment. (3) On-Site Sewage Disposal. i. All land uses identified in Section 3.6.5.a and Special Aquifer Recharge Protection Areas that are also classified as Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas (as defined in this Section), shall be designated Areas of Special Concern pursuant to Chapter 246-272-21501 WAC. A. Such designation shall identify minimum land area and best management practices for nitrogen removal as design parameters necessary for the protection of public health and groundwater quality. B. Best Management Practices (BMPs) shall be adopted by action of the Board of Health. UDC seawater intrusion amendment 3/3/03 2003 90-day compliance: Marrowstone Island Page 3 _ .J.ur INTY INT. LJL'.v:nni:s Li,O71�-:l.'t 4130T-7=77_^ ii. As new information becomes available that would classify an area as a Special Aquifer Recharge Protection Area or an Area of Special Concern under this Section, said area may be designated as such by the County.Any additional Areas of Special Concern designated through this process shall receive the same protections identified in Subsection (3)i.A and B above. (4) Golf Courses and Other Turf Cultivation. Golf courses shall be developed and operated in a manner consistent with "Best Management Practices for Golf Course Development and Operation", King County Environmental Division (now: Depart- ment of Development and Environmental Services), January 1993. Recreational and institutional facilities (e.g. parks and schools) with extensive areas of cultivated turf,shall be operated in a manner consistent with portions of the aforementioned best management practices pertaining to fertilizer and pesticide use, storage,and disposal. (5) Commercial Agriculture. Commercial agricultural activities, including landscaping operations must be operated in accordance with best management practices for fertilizer, pesticide, and animal waste management as developed by the Jefferson County Conservation District. (6) Above Ground Storage Tanks.Above ground tanks shall be fabricated, constructed, installed, used and operated in a manner which prevents the release of a hazardous substances or dangerous wastes to the ground or groundwater.Above ground storage tanks intended to hold or store hazardous substances or dangerous wastes are provided with an impervious containment area, equivalent to or greater than 100 percent of the tank volume, enclosing and underlying the tank, or ensure that other measures are undertaken as prescribed by the Uniform Fire Code which provide an equivalent measure of protection. (7) Mining and Quarrying. Mining and quarrying performance standards containing ground water protection best management practices pertaining to operation, closure, and the operation of gravel screening, gravel crushing, cement concrete batch plants, and asphalt concrete batch plants, where allowed, are contained in Sections 4 and 6 of this Code. (8) Hazardous Materials. Land use activities that generate hazardous waste, which are not prohibited outright under this code, and which are conditionally exempt from regulation by the Washington Department of Ecology under WAC 173-303-100, or which use, store, or handle hazardous substances, shall be required to prepare and submit a hazardous materials management plan that demonstrates that the development will not have an adverse impact on ground water quality. The hazardous materials management plan must be updated annually by the facility owner. (9) Well Drilling, Land Division, and Building Permits in Seawater Intrusion Protection Zones. Well Drilling: The Washington State Department of Ecology regulates well drilling pursuant to the Water Well Construction Act. Proposed wells, including those exempt from permitting requirements, must be sited at least 100 feet from"known or potential sources of contamination,"which include "Sea-salt water intrusion areas" (WAC 178-160-171), unless a variance is obtained from Ecology per WAC 173-160-106. ii. Subdivisions:Applications for land division (UDC Section 7)when the average net density proposed is less than five acres per dwelling unit must include specific and conclusive proof of adequate supplies of potable water through a qualifying hydrogeologic assessment(relevant components of an Aquifer Recharge Area Report per UDC 3.6.10.e)that demonstrates that the UDC seawater intrusion amendment 3/3/03 2003 90-day compliance: Marrowstone Island Page 4 • • • n T:" - ' ..y y 2.0l A !!37 1l..,1 Al^c y FnoPTT=D creation of new lots and corresponding use of water will not impact the subject aquifer such that water quality is degraded by seawater intrusion. Marrowstone Island Subdivision Moratorium: Due to the documented phenomenon of seawater intrusion on Marrowstone Island and the existence of undeveloped lots of record,Jefferson County has imposed a moratorium on additional land divisions on the Island until such time as public water is available. iii. Building Permits: A. Evidence of potable water may be an individual well, connection to a public water system,or an alternative system. Whatever method is selected,the-regulatory and operational standards for that method must be met, including Jefferson County Health Codes and Washington Administrative Code. B. All types of building permits that require proof of potable water use are subject to this policy,specifically building permits for new single-family residences (SFRs) or other structures with plumbing that are not associated with an existing SFR (i.e., shops or garages with a bathroom). iv. Voluntary and mandatory measures of the Jefferson County seawater intrusion policy apply to development proposals within the coastal, at risk, and high risk SIPZ, and upon Marrowstone Island, in the following manner, in addition to all existing applicable Health Codes: A. COASTAL SIPZ VOLUNTARY ACTIONS: 1. Water conservation measures. 2. Installation of a flow meter. 3. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration. 4. Submittal of data to County. MANDATORY ACTIONS: 1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available. 2. If public water is unavailable, an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirements: o Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application. 3. If public water is unavailable,a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. B. AT RISK SIPZ VOLUNTARY ACTIONS: 1. Water conservation measures. MANDATORY ACTIONS: 1. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available. 2. If public water is unavailable,an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirements: o Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application. UDC seawater intrusion amendment 3/3/03 2003 90-day compliance: Marrowstone Island Page 5 :Jii. :L'-"_' _'`.f--iij V'ERS/u o Installation of a flow meter. o On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration. o Submittal of flow and chloride data to the County per monitoring program. 3. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. C. HIGH RISK SIPZ MANDATORY ACTIONS: 1. Water conservation measures (per list maintained by UDC Administrator). 2. For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available. 3. If public water is unavailable,an individual well may only be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirements: o Variance from Chapter 173 WAC standards granted by Ecology per WAC 173-160-106 for a new groundwater well within 100 feet of a sea-salt water intrusion area per WAC 173-160-171 (i.e., within 100 feet of a groundwater source showing chloride concentrations above 200 mg/L or within 100 feet of the marine shoreline); orfor an existing groundwater well not subject to an Ecology variance, applicant must provide evidence through a hydrogeologic assessment (relevant components of an Aquifer Recharge Area Report per UDC 3.6.10.e) of a reasonable probability that the subject aquifer will not be degraded by the proposed use of the well. o Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application. o If chloride concentration exceeds 250 mg/L in a water sample submitted for a building permit,then the property owner shall be required to record a restrictive covenant that indicates a chloride reading exceeded the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency secondary standard (250 mg/L) under the National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations. o Installation of a flow meter. o On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration. o Submittal of flow and chloride data to the County per monitoring program. 4. If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. UDC seawater intrusion amendment 3/3/03 2003 90-day compliance: Marrowstone Island Page 6 . � �.J ¢fir u.. ^�t;aa F F ::1:: qtr r: :l >�.1I��-ii CD; u•�1Fv.F4f+tel^,l.v : ea. Y� - - C. MARROWSTONE ISLAND In addition to all voluntary and mandatory actions associated with the applicable SIPZ as described above,the following measures apply to all development proposals on Marrowstone Island that include groundwater withdrawal: VOLUNTARY ACTIONS 1. Installation of timers together with new well pump installations to enable pump use limitation to low demand times. MANDATORY ACTIONS 1. The use of a new well shall be conditioned through the associated building permit such that enrollment in a County-sponsored monitoring program is required, including periodic submittal of flow and chloride data as determined by the County. 2. Installation of a source-totalizing meter (flow). 3. Installation of a variable speed pump, controllable from the surface, in order to enable reduction of withdrawal rate, as may be necessary. 4. Installation of a 1,000-gallon minimum storage tank that shall conform to the ANSI/NSF Standard 61. 5. Marrowstone Island Groundwater Use Limitation: Groundwater withdrawal from all individual exempt wells, new and existing, on Marrowstone Island shall be limited to 1,000 gallons per day under the authority of the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A). (10) Mitigating Conditions.The Administrator may require additional mitigating conditions, as needed,to provide protection to all Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas to ensure that the subject land or water use action will not pose a risk of significant adverse groundwater quality impacts.The determination of significant adverse groundwater quality impacts will be based on the Antidegradation policy included in Chapter 173-200 WAC. (11) Authority for Denial.The Administrator may deny approval if the protection standards contained herein or added mitigating conditions cannot prevent significant adverse groundwater quality impacts. UDC seawater intrusion amendment 3/3/03 2003 90-day compliance: Marrowstone Island Page 7 GOAL: ENG 3.0 Ensure a sustainable and safe water supply as a critical necessity for residential, economic, and environmental needs. POLICIES: ENP 3.1 Work with the Water Utilities Coordinating Committee to revise the Coordinated Water System Plan for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, in order to provide a safe and adequate water supply for County residents and other uses in balance with the protection of environmental functions of water resources. ENP 3.2 Support the development and implementation of wellhead protection programs for all public supply wells, and encourage the siting and construction of individual wells in a manner which protects existing water users and the ground water supply. ENP 3.3 Preserve and protect both existing and future water supplies, and encourage activities which utilize alternative water sources that are compatible with environmental protection, in accordance with state and federal laws regulating alternative water uses. ENP 3.4 Relying on technical input from the PUD,WRIA Planning Units, State Department of Ecology,and others as appropriate, review well monitoring data annually and report to the • Board of County Commissioners on the status of seawater intrusion and other groundwater contaminants of concern in Jefferson County, and every five years prepare a comprehensive analysis. ENP 3.5 Implement an adaptive management program to protect groundwater against seawater intrusion. ENP 3.5.1 Conduct analysis of the monitoring data as follows: • Define area of concern based on the extent of monitoring data that indicates potential seawater intrusion. • Use appropriate combination of accepted scientific methodology for evaluating seawater intrusion impact, as described in Pacific Groundwater Group study(1996),Washington Administrative Code, United States Geological Survey protocol,and other contemporary examples and approaches. • Conduct appropriate statistical analysis for evaluating groundwater using methodology approved by the Environmental Protection Agency for groundwater monitoring, such as the Sen's Slope Indicator Test. ENP 3.5.2 If statistically significant degradation in an area is determined to be the result of seawater intrusion, Jefferson County will immediately take one or more of the following actions: • Adopt a moratorium in the affected area on the issuance of building permits for which individual groundwater wells are proposed as proof of potable water until such time as area water quality improves or a plan is developed with the objective of improving area water quality. • Adopt a moratorium on subdivisions in the affected area that propose individual groundwater wells as proof of potable water until such time as area water quality improves or a plan is developed with the objective of improving area water quality. • Establish an aquifer protection district via public vote (RCW 36.36) or, if necessary, petition Ecology to form a groundwater management area (per WAC 173-100). • ( E_4(Ni v1 rdyvvr�L I C'r_c 6,f4 ) Environmental Checklist A.BACKGROUND 1.Name of proposed project,if applicable: Marrowstone Island local utility district(LUD#15)water line extension project 2.Name of applicant: Public Utility District#1 of Jefferson County(PUD) 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Jim Parker,Manager 230 Chimacum Road, Port Hadlock,WA 98339 (360)385-5800 4.Date checklist prepared: June 30,2006 5. Agency requesting checklist: Jefferson County Washington State Department of Health,Drinking Water Division 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): Est.Date Duration Complete Fort Flagler Rd—Griffiths Point 9 months June 2007 Griffiths Point-East Marrowstone—Robbins Rd 9 months Mar 2008 Small roads depends on interest in hooking up Jan 2009 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion,or further activity related to or connected with this proposal?If yes, explain. This is a water line extension of an existing water system.No future expansion is projected beyond the proposed local utility district boundary (limited to island). Additional connections (late-comers)will be made gradually on the island over time after project completion as the island builds out. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Parametrix.2006.Revised Marrowstone Island Water System-Aquatic Resources Impact Assessment Report.Prepared for Jefferson County PUD No. 1.Bellevue,Washington. J E.;\: 3 0 2006 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal?If yes, explain. There are three pending water right applications currently on Marrowstone Island S2-29494, S2-30058,S2-30177,all for surface water. Two are for golf course ponds and the other is for a rain catchment system for a single home. These proposals may affect the properties covered in the proposal in that each may ultimately use an independent source over public water for non-potable irrigation. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. • Dept of Transportation/Jefferson County Public Works Permits • Shoreline Permit(s) • Jefferson County Conditional Use Permit • Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (JARPA) • DOH project report/Water System Plan Amendment • HPA permit for type 5 stream 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The proposed project is a local utility district(LUD)financed water line extension from the existing Quimper water system (System ID#05783-U). It will serve residential properties on Marrowstone Island. Water main size will vary from 8 inch to 2 inch. Total project will require approximately 120,000 linear feet of water main. Water lines will be laid along existing roads,rights of way and easements in ditch lines. The line extension will have the potential of serving up to 600 connections (in 20 yr demand forecast). 12. Location of the proposal. The location of the proposal covers Marrowstone Island in its entirety. Sections 8, 9, 17, 18, 20, 21, 28, 29, 32,33 Township 30 North, 1 East (WM); Sections 4, 5, 8,9, 16, 17 Township 29 North, 1 East(WM). FOR AGENCY EVALUATION USE ONLY J `V302006 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Generally rolling to flat terrain, except for steep cliffs on several aspects along the shoreline, particularly on the north and east sides of the island. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Project area is bounded slopes are that are vertical to near vertical glacial till cliffs which will be avoided. Greatest slope nears 5% in areas where water lines will be laid. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Mostly Whidbey-Dick association: well-drained and somewhat excessively drained, undulating to hilly, gravelly and sandy soils underlain by compact glacial till or loamy sand. From Soil Conservation Service, 1975. According to Jefferson County Soil Conservation District Manager Al Latham there are some prime agricultural soils on Marrowstone Island,however some would be considered wetland soils and would needs to be drained to be utilized. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. According to the Coastal Zone Atlas of Washington,Volume 11, 1979 (Jefferson County) there are unstable slopes and soils on Marrowstone Island, principally along the glacial till cliffs bounding the shoreline. There are three instances of unstable slopes and soils within the project area (where water lines will be laid) that may require mitigation measures. West end of Fort Gate Road - The road cuts into unstable slope zone as it descends to shoreline residential properties. A site visit showed no obvious evidence of recent soil creep or instability. However many Douglas fir trees show some indication of prior downslope movement as evidenced by slight"j" curvature of the base of the trunks. South end of Flagler Road —Immediately north of the entrance onto Marrowstone Island is another mapped area of unstable slopes and soils. The slope in this area has a relatively low gradient perpendicular to the road. Road intersects unstable zone for approximately 800 ft.An old slide and recent slide are on the shoreward side of the road,but not in the easement. There is no apparent evidence of soil movement visible from Fort Flagler Road. West end of Strawberry Lane—At the intersection of Strawberry Lane and Fort Flagler Road,the road comes within 20 ft of a 20 ft bluff to the beach. The west- facing slope from the last several hundred feet of Strawberry Lane to the bluff approaches 10-15%grade. About 500-600 ft of this section of roadway is within an "unstable" zone. u 2006 In all three areas flexible ball jointed pipes could be installed which will allow for some soil creep.Ball joints will be positioned immediately outside unstable zones and within them at regular intervals. e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Fill will be from native source of excavation; if necessary,sand will be imported to provide pipe bedding on an as need basis. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use?If so, generally describe. Yes,however very limited in extent. Some erosion of trench walls could occur during and after excavation prior to filling. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for example, asphalt or buildings)? No new buildings,asphalt or impervious surfaces are proposed. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth,if any: Contractor will be required to follow a project-specific storm water management plan administered by a project inspector employed by the PUD.Excavation spoils will be contained utilizing best management practices as recommended by Jefferson County Public Works and specifically how they will be contained will be detailed within the storm water management plan. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors,industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed?If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Construction activity regarding the laying of the lines should have negligible releases of dust and exhaust associated with the use of heavy equipment(back hoe, excavator). Additional heavy vehicle use will be minimal. The contractor will use BMPs to suppress the release of dust and emissions from project sites. The project will have no impact upon air emissions once completed. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal?If so, generally describe. No off-site sources of emissions should affect this project. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Contractors will perform County and State recommended best management practices for keeping dust and suspended particulate to a minimum. JUN 3 0 2006 3.Water a. Surface 1)Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,ponds,wetlands)?If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Marrowstone Island is located within the Admiralty Inlet,the marine entrance to Puget Sound. To the immediate west is Kilisut Harbor and Indian Island. USGS 7.5 minute quadrangle scale(1:28,000) shows that Marrowstone has no perennial or intermittent streams,however Jefferson County maps indicate there is at least one intermittent Type 5 stream that drains into Mystery Bay (near State Park entrance). Marrowstone has several small ponds; few are permanent(only one,SW of the intersection of East Marrowstone Rd and Renier Rd is evident on the 7.5 minute quadrangle). A few ponds are man-made. Some surface drainage courses have been altered to retain runoff as surface water or to facilitate infiltration and aquifer recharge.Many property owners capture rainwater for non-potable use. See Marrowstone Island Water System Aquatic Resources Impact Assessment for details. 2) Will the project require any work over,in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described waters?If yes,please describe and attach available plans. The project will,at particular locations,be within 200 ft of the shoreline when water lines are laid.Plans are subject to County hearing examiner for shoreline permitting and were approved,but currently are under appeal(Shoreline Permit#SDP05-00014 ).See Marrowstone Island Water System Aquatic Resources Impact Assessment for details. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. See Marrowstone Island Water System Aquatic Resources Impact Assessment for details. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. This project does not require a surface water withdrawal or diversion. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain?If so,note location on the site plan. No.Marrowstone Island is not within a floodplain. 6)Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters?If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. There are no appreciable surface waters on Marrowstone Island other than some ponds which will be easily avoided.Due to very low gradient slopes, existing berms within drainage ditches and a storm water pollution prevention plan the goal of zero discharge to surface waters (marine, in particular)is achievable. kl UN 3 0 2006 • b. Ground 1) Will ground water be withdrawn,or will water be discharged to ground water?Give general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known. During the project: Stormwater and sedimentation plans will be followed to substantially retain storm water along the ditches during the course of the project which will slowly infiltrate into the aquifer and/or evaporate. After development: The line extension project will be served by groundwater with PUD water rights from wells within the Chimacum Creek basin. The Marrowstone Island water line extension and service area was approved by the Washington State Department of Health in 2005(Jefferson PUD water system plan,2005), The Department of Ecology acknowledges Marrowstone Island as the PUD's legal"place of use" for its water rights. Existing demand to Island is from Fort Flagler State Park and a USGS biological field station.Projected peak demand will be 300 gpm in the summer(600 connections). Most of this water will serve domestic connections and therefore be non-consumptive and some will infiltrate as return flow from septic tanks and drainfields. The impact of the water withdrawal from the Chimacum basin on the Chimacum basin is largely unknown, however septic return flows that likely discharge into the creek will not change as there will be no change to flow to Quimper customers and their septic systems. The potential impact within the Chimacum basin from the capture of streams (AKA hydraulic continuity) by PUD wells is not well understood.While a major local hydrogeologic study says that the primary well (Spading)is not in direct hydraulic continuity with Chimacum Creek(CH2MHill, 1996),the extent of the hydraulic connection between the Vashon advance outwash aquifer and Chimacum Creek is the focus of local resource management efforts. The limit of the impact can be no greater than the amount of ground water withdrawn at peak periods which is forecast as 300gpm. Capture would be some unknown fraction of this amount. JUN 3 0 2006 2)Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial,containing the following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. 2 No appreciable increase in discharge to ground water from s tic tan's will result from the project. Inside domestic use of water will probab ewhat for existing homes,however,all septic systems are designed for simila capacity regardless of whether a house is on public water or not.This checklist can not anticipate the extent of future buildout and septic systems based upon the proposed water line extension. Septic discharge to ground water is controlled by design specifications which will not change as a result of the project.What will change is the source of the water for the on-site septic disposal which will be from public water rather that from on-site well water and/or rain catchment. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1)Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities,if known). Where will this water flow?Will this water flow into other waters?If so,describe. During construction drainage will be contained using standard erosion control practices so as to prevent runoff of excavated materials,particularly on the steeper slopes.After completion of project there should be no effect upon surface drainage. Project will need to have and follow a stormwater/sedimentation management plan. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters?If so, generally describe. Excavated materials (soil,regolith,etc)will be used as fill where extracted or clean sand will be imported onto the site.Erosion prevention measures will be used to prevent materials from entering surface or ground water. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts,if any: Contractor will be required to follow a project-specific storm water pollution prevention plan(SWPPP)administered by an on-site project inspector. Excavation spoils will be contained utilizing recognized erosion control best management practices stipulated within the SWPPP as recommended by Jefferson County Public Works. JUN 302006 ! • ' • 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ("site" means entire island) - deciduous tree: red alder,willow, big leaf maple,cottonwood - evergreen tree: douglas fir,madrona,western wed wedar - shrubs: sea spray, manzanita - grass: various species - pasture Pasture land is adjacent to water lines - crop or grain Some crop or grain may be located adjacent to water line sites. - wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bulirush, skunk cabbage, other Some wet soil plants are adjacent to ditches where water lines will be laid. - water plants: water lily, eelgrass,milfoil, other see wetland report - other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some herbaceous vegetation lining the ditches will be removed or altered. Approximately 10 trees will be removed at Fort Flagler.Principally grasses and other "disturbance" or early successional annual species would be removed. Disturbed areas will be re-seeded. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. No threatened or endangered plant species are known to be on the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: There are no proposed measures to preserve and enhance vegetation on site. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: ("Site" mean entire island,listing is incomplete but all seen by me at times on island) birds: hawk,heron, eagle, songbirds, other osprey,bald eagle,owl,great blue heron, greater yellowlegs, brant, Anjerican goldfinch,white-crowned sparrow, bufflehead,western kingbird __ JUN 3 0 2006 r mammals: deer,bear, elk,beaver, other otter,deer, raccoon fish: bass, salmon,trout,herring, shellfish, other. Salmon,herring and shellfish abound offshore. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Marrowstone Island lies within the ESU for threatened Puget Sound Chinook,and the ESU for threatened Hood Canal Summer Chum. Bald eagles breed at several locations on the island. See "No-effect Letter"(Chum salmon addendum pending)for a more complete listing. c. Is the site part of a migration route?If so,explain. The entire region lies within the Pacific Flyway. The island is listed as an Important Bird Area (IBA) by Audubon Washington. Migratory passerine species frequent the island in spring and fall. Black Brandt,American widgeon,Northern Pintail, Harlequin Ducks and other waterfowl over-winter in the area. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any: No measures to preserve or enhance wildlife as wildlife will not be adversely affected by the project. Project will minimize interfere with bird or mammal habitat. 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy(electric,natural gas, oil,wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs?Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electrical power may be required to pump water at some locations though much will be gravity fed. Electrical power source comes from utility off-island. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?If so, generally describe. No.All structures associated with this line extension are below ground level. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: No energy conservation plans proposed as there will be no adverse energy impacts. Water lines will be laid to maximize head utilization and minimize power required to convey water within the project area. JUN 302006 • 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste,that could occur as a result of this proposal?If so, describe. There are no environmental health hazards that would result from the proposal. The proposal will extend water service to the island, and thereby should improve environmental health conditions and lessen fire risk on the island. 1)Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special emergency services will be required from the result of this proposal. 2)Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if any: No special measures to control environmental health risks will be required as there are no environmental hazards. b. Noise 1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example: traffic,equipment, operation,other)? No external source of noise should affect the project. 2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis(for example:traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. There will be some noise from heavy machinery operation of a backhoe or excavator during the daylight hours (8 AM—5 PM). There will be no long term sound impacts. 8. Land and shoreline use What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? a. Primarily residential,forestland and some agricultural in order of total area. Has the site been used for agriculture?If so,describe. b. A few properties on the island have been used for agriculture. Agriculture historically limited to dryland farming and livestock due to lack of water availability. There are and have been in the past some small orchards. Currently only 7 or 8 relatively small parcels are zoned for agriculture varying in size from about 3-8 acres. Describe any structures on the site. c. The project area consists almost entirely of residential homes, sheds and garages. Will any structures be demolished?If so,what? d. No structures will be demolished. What is the current zoning classification of the site? e. Primarily Rural Residential 1-5, Rural Residential 1-10, very minor 1-20 Rural Residential; Parks,Preserves and Recreation; Agriculture,Forestland. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? f. Not a"site"per se,but the service area comprehensive plan designation is covered in JUN 3 O 2006 ' zoning(e.) above. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? g. Marine Shoreline is designated as Conservancy. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Project is a water system to serve largely existing residents and is not a new development or business complex. Project is designed to serve the needs of the existing population and the potential buildout of the island up to 600 total connections according to existing zoning.Assuming 2.2 persons per connection and the anticipated number of people that would be served would be approximately 1320 people. The question of how many people would work in the completed project is not applicable. j. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area?If so, specify. Much of the island's environment and area is not directly affected by the project or the projects construction activities.Environmentally sensitive areas that are on the island but will not be adversely affected by project's water lines or construction activities include: 1) Critical aquifer recharge areas—the water lines will bring in water that will likely raise water tables as public water is substituted for private well use. 2) Erosion Hazards—are no erosion hazards near where water lines are proposed. 3) Landslide-which the exception of the areas described in Earth 1.(d),there are no areas near water lines that will be affected. 4) Wetlands—are largely tidal salt marsh on Marrowstone,with some minor forest and scrub wetlands.Project will endeavor to avoid wetlands. See associated report Marrowstone Island Water System—Aquatic Resources Impact Assessment by Parametrix(2006) k. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? No people would be displaced by this project. 1. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: No measures would be applicable. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any?Indicate whether high,middle, or low-income housing. No new additional housing units will be provided.This is a water system expansion project,therefore question is not applicable. b. Approximately how many units, if any,would be eliminated?Indicate whether high, middle,or low-income housing. No housing units will be eliminated. c• Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any: Project will have no negative housing impacts. JUN 3 0 2006 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? With the exception of fire hydrants,no new structure associated with the water system line extension will rise above ground level. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? All water lines will be below ground level.No views would be obstructed by the installation of the water lines. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: No proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts. 11 Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? This project will not produce light or glare at any time of day. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? There should be no glare from any aspect or equipment used in this project. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? No off-site sources of light or glare should affect this project. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: No proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts as there will be none. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Recreation on and around the island is multi-varied. The island is a popular cycling area, although there are no bike lanes or paths outside Fort Flagler.Many residents walk for exercise. There is a private golf course on the island, an RV park and several designated picnic areas. Kite flying is also popular. A wide range of water activities are possible offshore from fishing to sailing. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses?If so,;descn"be No recreational uses will be displaced. Some bicycling opportunities mi y he temporarily hindered by water line construction work. 'f JUN 3 0 2006 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation,including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: No proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation. Cyclists should be able to get around construction activity. 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for,national, state,or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site?If so, generally describe. No places or objects listed on,or proposed for,national,state, or local preservation registers are known to be within the project area(outside Fort Flagler). b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. No landmarks or evidence of historic,archaeological,scientific, or cultural importance are known to be on or next to the project area (outside Fort Flagler). c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any: No proposed measures to reduce or control impacts. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any. Not applicable to project. b. Is site currently served by public transit?If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No.First transit stop is within the Tri-Area approximately 4 miles away. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? No parking spaces will be created or eliminated. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets,not including driveways?If so, generally describe(indicate whether public or private). No new roads or streets will be created or improved. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail,or air transportation?If so,generally describe. The project will not use water,rail or air transportation. • JUN 3 0 2006 • f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project?If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. This project will not affect the daily generation of traffic one way or another. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: During construction,contractor will meet State traffic control requirements. 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,police protection,health care, schools, other)?If so, generally describe. Project will result in increased water service and fire protection. Will provide water to Mystery Bay State Park, allowing for public restrooms to be built for instance. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. No public services need to be reduced or controlled. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity,natural gas, water,refuse service,telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity,telephone and DSL services are available on the island. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The proposed project is to bring a utility service to more of Marrowstone Island. The resulting water service will require no more utility services than it does not already use(electrical power purchased from Puget Sound Energy). C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: jwhr d � JUN 3 0 2006 y7b0106 cco _wo JEFFERSON COUNTY STATE OF WASHINGTON Adopting Amendments to the } Unified Development Code } Ordinance#08-0710-06 WHEREAS, the Unified Development Code(UDC)was originally adopted on December 18,2000 and subsequently amended through the following ordinances: 03- 0702-01, 07-1224-01,02-0311-02, 04-0422-02,07-0732-02, 18-1213-02,21-1220-02, 02-0210-03,03-0303-03, 05-0428-03, 06-0609-03,06-0510-04, 10-0823-04 and 02- 0126-06; and WHEREAS,there have been substantive changes to state law and recent court decisions since the adoption of the UDC,references to the Uniform Building Code need to be replaced with the International Building Code; and WHEREAS,portions of the UDC have been further clarified by code interpretations and judicial decisions that have been clarified in the UDC; and WHEREAS, for legal use the UDC has been numbered according to the Jefferson County Code(JCC); and WHEREAS,the Board completes this process by the adoption of this ordinance and now makes the following findings of fact: 1. The Planning Commission UDC Committee met with staff a total of seventeen(17) times between March,2004, and May, 2005. All meetings were duly-noticed and open to the public. 2. The joint Long-Range Planning staff and UDC Committee proposed Preliminary Draft was transmitted to the full Planning Commission under a cover memo dated 5/31/05. 3. The Preliminary Draft proposed changes to the format of the UDC, specifically moving the UDC to be incorporated into the Jefferson County Code (JCC),codified at Title 18 of the JCC. 4. The Preliminary Draft was presented to the full Planning Commission on June 1,2005,with an introduction. Ordinance No. 08-0710-06 Amendments to Unified Development Code 5. The Planning Commission deliberated on the Preliminary Draft at regularly scheduled meetings held on June 15 and July 20,2005. The commissioners proposed some further revisions to the Preliminary Draft. 6. The Planning Commission voted unanimously(8-0)on July 20, 2005, to accept the UDC Omnibus as presented and amended and to move it on for formal public review(the Public Review draft). 7. The Department of Community Development(DCD)issued an integrated SEPA/GMA notice of intent to amend the development code on September 14,2005, including completion of an environmental checklist for non-project actions. 8. The Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public hearing on October 5, 2005. Oral public comment related to the proposed UDC amendments was taken during the public hearing and written comments were accepted through the close of business on October 12,2005. 9. DCD provided the following memoranda to the Planning Commission to supplement the record: October 5: Additional Staff Recommendations for the UDC Omnibus October 13: Additional Staff Recommendations for the UDC Omnibus 10. The Planning Commission deliberated on the proposed UDC amendments at regularly scheduled meetings on October 19 and November 2, 2005,making a few additional specific revisions to the Public Review draft,and completed deliberations on November 2. 11. The Board of County Commissioners held a duly noticed public hearing January 9, 2006. The BOCC deliberated on January 17, 2006 and approved a portion of the UDC Omnibus amendment package. 12. Department of Community Development (DCD) staff and the Planning Commission recommended extending the deadline for the Comprehensive Plan amendment cycle from February 1 to March 1. DCD and the Planning Commission wanted to provide more time for the department and for citizens to prepare site-specific and suggested Comprehensive Plan amendments. Page 2 of 4 Ordinance No. 08-0710-06 Amendments to Unified Development Code 13. The UDC Omnibus amendment package has a large number of changes. Although the majority of the changes do not have a specific urgency, one of the changes moves the date of the Comprehensive Plan amendment cycle from February ls`to March 1st 14. The BoCC adopted UDC amendments to Jefferson County Code chapters 18.45 and 18.50 with changes from the Planning Commission recommendations for 18.45 through Ordinance 02-0126-06. 15. The BoCC requested an annotation from Planning Commission and the Department of Community Development (DCD)on the remaining UDC Omnibus amendments. 16. DCD,the Planning Commission and the UDC sub-committee reviewed the formation of the proposed amendments and drafted an annotation. The Planning Commission held a duly notice public meetings on 4/19 and 5/3/06. Oral public comment related to the proposed UDC amendments was taken during the public hearing and written comments were accepted through the close of business on 5/3/06. 17. DCD provided the following memoranda to the Planning Commission to supplement the record: 5/2: Additional staff recommendations for the UDC Omnibus 18. The BoCC reviewed the annotation supplied by the Planning Commission and DCD on 5/22 and 6/5 and moved to table a public hearing on the UDC Omnibus for two weeks. 19. The BoCC held a duly noticed public hearing on the UDC Omnibus on 6/19/06. Oral public comment was taken during the public hearing and written comments were accepted through the close of business on 6/19/06. 20. Further discussion sessions between the BoCC and DCD staff took place on 6/19/06 and 6/21/06. BoCC decided to separate proposed amendments regarding `mineral extraction and processing' from the rest of the UDC Omnibus. The BoCC further requested a memo from noting the items discussed on 6/19 and 6/21. 21. DCD provided the following memoranda to BoCC on 6/10: 6/22: Reviewed UDC Omnibus Items memo 22. The BoCC has decided to approve the amendments contained in Jefferson County Code chapters 18.05, 1810, 18.20, 18.25, 18.30, 18.35 and 18.40. 23. The BoCC has made changes to the Planning Commission recommendations for chapter 18.20 removing `mineral extraction and processing' amendments from the Omnibus package for separate consideration. Page 3 of 4 Ordinance No. 08-0710-06 Amendments to Unified Development Code NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, as follows: SECTION 1. The current version County's Unified Development Code, also known as the Jefferson County Code, Section 1 Introductory Provisions, Section 2 Definitions, Section 3 Land Use Districts, Section 4 Performance and Use-Specific Standards, Section 6 Development Standards, Section 7 Land Divisions and Section 8 Permit Application and Review Procedures/SEPA Implementation are hereby repealed and replaced with the attached version of Jefferson County Code Chapters 18.05, 18.10, 18.15, 18.20 18.30, 18.35 and 18.40. SECTION 2. Should any provision or portion of this Ordinance be declared unlawful,not compliant with the GMA or invalid under the GMA, then it is the express intent of the County Commission that the earlier or prior version of the unlawful, non- compliant or invalid provision or portion of this Ordinance shall be revived and shall resume and have full regulatory force and effect. SECTION 3. If any provision or portion of this Ordinance or its application be declared unlawful,not compliant with the GMA or invalid under the GMA, such a declaration of unlawfulness,non-compliance or invalidty shall not alter the regulatory effect and authority of the other provisions of this Ordinance not subject to such a declaration and the application of the remaining provision or provisions to persons or circumstances is not affected. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect 8:00 AM July 17, 2006. Adopted this 10th day of July,2006. ,e-4011,.,, ,ca�a, JEFFERSON COUNTY 0 i ' ' V ' ' rs, BOARD OF 0 I ISSIONERS s , o o r . 44 \% � r V1‘.t-4 aw" "fi r. • A ,` : a `t Phil Johns. •, Chairman 4 / .- 1� ATTEST: David C. S liv3n, "in•er Julie Matthes, CMC ` IDS; ,�, Deputy Clerk of the Board Patrick M.--•odgers, Member Page 4 of 4 Chapter 18.15 LAND USE DISTRICTS Sections: Article I. Land Use Districts 18.15.005 Classes established. 18.15.010 Urban growth areas (UGA). 18.15.015 Rural lands. 18.15.020 Resource lands. 18.15.025 Master planned resort. 18.15.030 Public. Article II. Land Use Regulations— Allowable and Prohibited Uses by Designation 18.15.035 General applicability. 18.15.040 Categories of land use. 18.15.045 Unnamed uses. 18.15.050 Multiple designations. 18.15.055 Allowable residential density. 18.15.060 Development standards and use limitations. 18.15.065 Criteria for site-specific redesignations and master planned resort approval. 18.15.070 Application, notice, and appeal requirements. 18.15.075 Variances from standards. 18.15.080 Change of use. Article III. Land Use Regulations—General Provisions 18.15.085 Applicability. 18.15.090 Archaeological and historical site protection. 18.15.095 Right to farm and forestry provisions. 18.15.100 Development permits and resource lands. 18.15.105 Overlay districts and subarea plans. 18.15.110 Special use permit— Siting of essential public facilities. Article IIIA. Jefferson County International Airport Essential Public Facilities District (AEPF). 18.15.1110 Designated. 18.15.1112 Purpose. 18.15.1114 Permitted, Conditional and Prohibited Uses. 18.15.1116 Permitted Uses. 18.15.1118 Conditional Uses. 18.15.1120 Accessory Uses. 18.15.1122 Prohibited Uses. 18.15.1124 Development Standards. 18.15.1126 Electrical Emissions. 18.15.1128 Lighting. 18.15.1130 Height Restrictions. 18.15.1132 Ground Transportation Facilities. Article IV. Master Planned Resorts— Special Provisions 18.15.115 Designated. Draft 6/26/06 18.15.120 Purpose and intent. 18.15.123 Allowable uses. 18.15.126 Requirements for master planned resorts. 18.15.129 Application requirements and approval process. 18.15.132 Decision-making authority. 18.15.135 Criteria for approval. 18.15.138 Port Ludlow Master Planned Resort. Article V. Rural and Resource Districts— Special Provisions 18.15.140 Agricultural and forest resource lands— Site-specific designations and amendments. 18.15.145 Agricultural resource districts. 18.15.150 Forest resource districts. Article VI. Overlay Districts Article VI-A. Purpose 18.15.155 Established. Article VI-B. Maps 18.15.160 Official maps. 18.15.165 Environmentally sensitive areas (ESA)maps. Article VI-C. Mineral Resource Lands District (MRL) 18.15.170 Designation procedures. 18.15.175 Allowable and prohibited uses. 18.15.180 Nuisance and disclosure provisions. Article VI-D. Environmentally Sensitive Areas District (ESA) 18.15.185 Purpose. 18.15.190 Applicability. 18.15.195 Allowable uses. 18.15.200 Coverage. 18.15.205 General exceptions. 18.15.210 General exemptions. 18.15.215 Nonconforming uses. 18.15.220 Reasonable economic use variance. 18.15.225 Notice. 18.15.230 Findings. 18.15.235 Conditions. Article VI-E. Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas 18.15.240 Classification. 18.15.245 Designation. 18.15.250 Applicability. 18.15.255 Protection standards. Article VI-F. Frequently Flooded Areas 18.15.260 Incorporation by reference. 18.15.265 Relationship to other regulations. Article VI-G. Geologically Hazardous Areas 18.15.270 Classification/designation. 18.15.275 Protection standards. 18.15.280 Conditions. Draft 6/26/06 2 (4) All hearing notices shall include a legal description of the property involved, and a concise description of the variance requested in nonlegal language. [Ord. 11-00 § 3.6.4(i)] 18.15.230 Findings. A reasonable economic use variance may be granted only when the hearing examiner finds that the application meets all of the following criteria: (1) No reasonable economic use with less impact on the ESA or its buffer is possible. (2) There is no feasible on-site alternative to the proposed activities that would allow a reasonable economic use with less adverse impacts to environmentally sensitive areas or ESA buffers. Feasible on-site alternatives shall include, but are not limited to reduction in density; phasing of project implementation; change in timing of activities; and revision of road or parcel layout or related site planning considerations. (3) The proposed variance will result in the minimum feasible alteration or impairment to the environmentally sensitive areas functional characteristics and existing contours, vegetation, fish and wildlife resources, and hydrological conditions. (4) Disturbance of environmentally sensitive areas has been minimized by locating any necessary alteration in ESA buffers to the minimum extent possible. (5) The proposed variance will not cause degradation to surface or groundwater quality. (6) The proposed variance complies with all federal, state and local statutory and common law, including the Endangered Species Act, and statutory laws related to sediment control, pollution control, floodplain restrictions, and on site wastewater disposal, and common law relating to property and nuisance. (7) There will be no material damage to nearby public or private property and no material threat to the health or safety of people on or off the property. (8) The inability to derive reasonable economic use of the property is not the result of actions by the applicant in segregating or dividing the property and creating the undevelopable condition after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this code. [Ord. 11-00 § 3.6.4(j)] 18.15.235 Conditions. (1) In granting approval for reasonable economic use variances, the hearing examiner may require mitigating conditions that will, in the examiner's judgment, substantially secure the objectives of this code. (2) In granting approval for reasonable economic use variances involving designated wetlands, the hearing examiner shall consider the following mitigating conditions: (a) Provision of a mitigation plan demonstrating how the applicant intends to substantially restore the site to predevelopment conditions following project completion; and (b) The restoration, creation or enhancement of wetlands and their buffers in order to offset the impacts resulting from the applicant's actions; the overall goal of any restoration, creation or enhancement project shall be no net loss of wetlands function and acreage. [Ord. 11-00 § 3.6.4(k)] Article VI-E. Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas 18.15.240 Classification. Critical aquifer recharge areas are naturally susceptible due to the existence of permeable soils or a seawater wedge in coastline aquifers. Certain overlying land uses Draft 6/26/06 38 can lead to water quality and/or quantity degradation. The following classifications define critical aquifer recharge areas. (1) Susceptible aquifer recharge areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. For the purposes of this Article VI-E, unless otherwise determined by preparation of an aquifer recharge area report authorized under this article, the following geologic units, as identified from available State of Washington Department of Natural Resources geologic mapping, define susceptible aquifer recharge areas for east Jefferson County: (a) Alluvial fans(Ha); (b) Artificial fill (Hx); (c) Beach sand and gravel alb); (d) Dune sand (Hd); (e) Floodplain alluvium (Hf); (f) Vashon recessional outwash in deltas and alluvial fans(Vrd); (g) Vashon recessional outwash in meltwater channels (Vro); (h) Vashon ice contact stratified drift (Vi); (i) Vashon ablation till (Vat); (j) Vashon advance outwash (Vao); (k) Whidbey formation (Pw); and (1) Pre-Vashon stratified drift (Py). (2) Those areas meeting the requirements of susceptible aquifer recharge areas (above) and which are overlain by the following land uses as identified in this code are subject to the provisions of the protection standards in this article: (a) All industrial land uses; (b) All commercial uses; (c) All rural residential land uses: (i) Requiring a discretionary use or conditional use permit, or (ii) With nonconforming uses that would otherwise require a discretionary use or conditional use permit; (d) Unsewered planned rural residential developments; (e) Unsewered residential development with gross densities greater than one unit per acre. (3) Special aquifer recharge protection areas include: (a) Sole source aquifers designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in accordance with the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-523); (b) Special protection areas designated by the Washington Department of Ecology under Chapter 173-200 WAC; (c) Wellhead protection areas determined in accordance with delineation methodologies specified by the Washington Department of Health under authority of Chapter 246-290 WAC; (d) Groundwater management areas designated by the Washington Department of Ecology in cooperation with local government under Chapter 173-100 WAC. (4) Seawater intrusion protection zones (SIPZ) are aquifers and land overlying aquifers with some degree of vulnerability to seawater intrusion. SIPZ are defined either by proximity to marine shoreline or by proximity to groundwater sources that have demonstrated high chloride readings. All islands and land area within one-quarter mile of Draft 6/26/06 39 marine shorelines and associated aquifers together compose the coastal SIPZ. Additionally, areas within 1,000 feet of a groundwater source with a history of chloride analyses above 100 milligrams per liter (mg/L) are categorized as either at risk (between 100 mg/L and 200 mg/L) or high risk (over 200 mg/L) SIPZ. Individual groundwater sources with a history of chloride analyses above 200 mg/L shall be considered "sea-salt water intrusion areas," which are among the"sources or potential sources of contamination" listed in Washington Administrative Code(WAC) 173-160-171, implementing code for the Water Well Construction Act. In some cases, high chloride readings may be indicative of connate seawater(i.e., relic seawater in aquifers as opposed to active seawater intrusion). When best available science or a hydrogeologic assessment demonstrate that high chloride readings in a particular area are due to connate seawater,the area in question shall not be considered an at risk or high risk SIPZ. When the status of an area is in question, the UDC administrator is responsible for making the determination based upon recommendation from county department of health and human services. [Ord. 6-03 § 2; Ord. 3-03 § 1; Ord. 9-02 § 1; Ord. 4-02 § 2; Ord. 11-00 § 3.6.5(a)] 18.15.245 Designation. Jefferson County shall prepare and exhibit dated critical aquifer recharge area maps which demonstrate the approximate distribution of the susceptible aquifer recharge areas, special aquifer recharge protection areas, and seawater intrusion protection zones. The critical aquifer recharge area maps shall be periodically revised, modified, and updated to reflect additional information. [Ord. 6-03 § 2; Ord. 3-03 § 1; Ord. 9-02 § 1; Ord. 4-02 § 2; Ord. 11-00 § 3.6.5(b)] 18.15.250 Applicability. (1) The following land use activities are considered high impact land uses due to the probability and/or potential magnitude of their adverse effects on groundwater and shall be prohibited in susceptible aquifer recharge areas and special aquifer recharge protection areas. In all other areas of the county outside of susceptible aquifer recharge areas and special aquifer recharge protection areas, these activities shall require an aquifer recharge area report pursuant to this Article VI-E: (a) Chemical manufacturing and reprocessing; (b) Creosote/asphalt manufacturing or treatment (except that asphalt batch plants may be permitted in susceptible aquifer recharge areas only if such areas lie outside of special aquifer recharge protection areas and only if best management practices are implemented pursuant to JCC 18.20.240(2)(h)(iv) and 18.30.170 and an accepted aquifer recharge area report); (c) Electroplating and metal coating activities; (d) Hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facilities; (e) Petroleum product refinement and reprocessing; (f) Underground storage tanks for petroleum products or other hazardous materials; (g) Recycling facilities as defined in this code; (h). Solid waste landfills; (i) Waste piles as defined in Chapter 173-304 WAC; (j) Wood and wood products preserving; (k) Storage and primary electrical battery processing and reprocessing. Draft 6/26/06 40 (2) All other land uses shall be subject to the protection standards contained in this article and mitigating conditions included with an aquifer recharge area report, where applicable. (3) Seawater Intrusion Protection Zones. Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals (primarily through wells). New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible. [Ord. 6-03 § 2; Ord. 3-03 § 1; Ord. 9-02 § 1; Ord. 4-02§2; Ord. 11-00 § 3.6.5(c)] 18.15.255 Protection standards. (1) General. The following protection standards shall apply to land use activities in susceptible aquifer recharge areas and special aquifer protection areas, and when specified in seawater intrusion protection zones, unless mitigating conditions have been identified in a critical aquifer recharge report that has been prepared pursuant to this Article VI-E. (2) Stormwater Disposal. (a) In all critical aquifer recharge areas, stormwater runoff shall be controlled and treated in accordance with best management practices and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin, as amended, and the stormwater provisions contained in Chapter 18.30 JCC. (b) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within one-quarter mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff on site. The administrator will consider requests for exceptions to this policy on a case-by-case basis. This provision is interpreted as establishing a hierarchy in which the first and best alternative is on-site infiltration using drywells or other methods, the second best alternative is direct discharge into marine waters through a stormwater tightline. In order to utilize the least preferred alternative, which is considered an exception to the policy, applicants must demonstrate through a geotechnical or similar report prepared by a licensed professional that both on-site infiltration and upland off-site disposal are not practicable or feasible. The report must include cost figures for comparison. (3) On-Site Sewage Disposal. (a) All land uses identified in JCC 18.15.240 and special aquifer recharge protection areas that are also classified as susceptible aquifer recharge areas (as defined in this article) shall be designated areas of special concern pursuant to WAC 246-272-21501. (i) Such designation shall identify minimum land area and best management practices for nitrogen removal as design parameters necessary for the protection of public health and groundwater quality. (ii) Best management practices(BMPs) shall be adopted by action of the Board of Health. Draft 6/26/06 41 • (b) As new information becomes available that would classify an area as a special aquifer recharge protection area or an area of special concern under this article, said area may be designated as such by the county. Any additional areas of special concern designated through this process shall receive the same protections identified in subsection (3)(a)of this section. (4) Golf Courses and Other Turf Cultivation. In all critical aquifer recharge areas, golf courses shall be developed and operated in a manner consistent with"Best Management Practices for Golf Course Development and Operation," King County environmental division (now: department of development and environmental services), January 1993. Recreational and institutional facilities (e.g., parks and schools)with extensive areas of cultivated turf shall be operated in a manner consistent with portions of the aforementioned best management practices pertaining to fertilizer and pesticide use, storage, and disposal. In seawater intrusion protection zones, golf courses and other turf cultivation using groundwater for irrigation shall be prohibited, unless the water source is located outside of seawater intrusion protection zones or in an approved public water supply. (5) Commercial Agriculture. Commercial agricultural activities, including landscaping operations, must be operated in accordance with best management practices for fertilizer, pesticide, and animal waste management as developed by the Jefferson County Conservation District. (6) Above-Ground Storage Tanks. Above-ground tanks shall be fabricated, constructed, installed, used and operated in a manner which prevents the release of hazardous substances or dangerous wastes to the ground or groundwater. Above-ground storage tanks intended to hold or store hazardous substances or dangerous wastes are provided with an impervious containment area, equivalent to or greater than 100 percent of the tank volume, enclosing and underlying the tank, or ensure that other measures are undertaken as prescribed by the Uniform Fire Code which provide an equivalent measure of protection. (7) Mining and Quarrying. Mining and quarrying performance standards containing groundwater protection best management practices pertaining to operation, closure, and the operation of gravel screening, gravel crushing, cement concrete batch plants, and asphalt concrete batch plants, where allowed, are contained in Chapters 18.20 and 18.30 JCC. (8) Hazardous Materials. Land use activities that generate hazardous waste, which are not prohibited outright under this code, and which are conditionally exempt from regulation by the Washington Department of Ecology under WAC 173-303-100, or which use, store, or handle hazardous substances, shall be required to prepare and submit a hazardous materials management plan that demonstrates that the development will not have an adverse impact on groundwater quality. The hazardous materials management plan must be updated annually by the facility owner. (9) Well Drilling, Land Division, and Building Permits in Seawater Intrusion Protection Zones. (a) Well Drilling. The Washington State Department of Ecology regulates well drilling pursuant to the Water Well Construction Act. Proposed wells, including those exempt from permitting requirements, must be sited at least 100 feet from "known or Draft 6/26/06 42 potential sources of contamination," which include "sea-salt water intrusion areas" (WAC 178-160-171), unless a variance is obtained from Ecology per WAC 173-160-106. (b) Subdivisions. Applications for land division (Chapter 18.35 JCC) must include specific and conclusive proof of adequate supplies of potable water through a qualifying hydrogeologic assessment (relevant components of an aquifer recharge area report per JCC 18.15.375)that demonstrates that the creation of new lots and corresponding use of water will not impact the subject aquifer such that water quality is degraded by seawater intrusion. (1) Marrowstone Island Subdivision Moratorium. Due to documented seawater intrusion on Marrowstone Island and the existence of undeveloped lots of record, Jefferson County has imposed a moratorium on additional land divisions on the island until such time as public water is available or it is demonstrated through the well monitoring program that groundwater quality is not degrading due to seawater intrusion. (c) Building Permits. (i) Evidence of potable water may be an individual well, connection to a public water system, or an alternative system. Whatever method is selected, the regulatory and operational standards for that method must be met, including Jefferson County health codes and Washington Administrative Code. Pursuant to Section 4 of the state "Guidelines for Determining Water Availability for New Buildings" (Ecology Publication 93-27), investigation and identification of well interference problems and impairment to senior rights is the responsibility of the Washington Department of Ecology. If the possibility of a problem is suspected, the local permitting authority should contact Ecology. (ii) All types of building permits that require proof of potable water use are subject to this policy, specifically building permits for new single-family residences(SFRs) or other structures with plumbing that are not associated with an existing SFR(i.e., shops or garages with a bathroom). (d) Voluntary and mandatory measures of the Jefferson County seawater intrusion policy apply to development proposals within the coastal, at risk, and high risk SIPZ, and upon Marrowstone Island, in the following manner, in addition to all existing applicable health codes: (i) Coastal SIPZ. (A) Voluntary actions: (I) Water conservation measures; (II) On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration; (III) Submittal of data to county. (B) Mandatory actions: (I) For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available; (II) If public water is unavailable, an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirement: 1. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application; 2. Installation of source-totalizing meter(flow). (III) If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. Draft 6/26/06 43 (ii) At Risk SIPZ. (A) Voluntary actions: (I) Water conservation measures. (B) Mandatory actions: (I) For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available; (H) If public water is unavailable, an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirements: 1. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application; 2. Installation of a source-totalizing meter (flow); 3. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration; 4. Submittal of flow and chloride data to the county per monitoring program; (III) If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. (iii) High Risk SIPZ. (A) Mandatory actions: (I) Water conservation measures (per list maintained by UDC administrator); (II) For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available; (III) If public water is unavailable, an individual well may only be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirements: 1. Variance from WAC Title 173 standards granted by Ecology per WAC 173-160-106 for a new groundwater well within 100 feet of a sea-salt water intrusion area per WAC 173-160-171 (i.e., within 100 feet of a groundwater source showing chloride concentrations above 200 mg/L or within 100 feet of the marine shoreline); or for an existing groundwater well not subject to an Ecology variance, applicant must provide a hydrogeologic assessment (relevant components of an aquifer recharge area report per JCC 18.15.375)which shall be transmitted to Ecology for review, demonstrating that use of the well does not cause any detrimental interference with existing water rights and is not detrimental to the public interest; 2. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application; 3. If chloride concentration exceeds 250 mg/L in a water sample submitted for a building permit,then the property owner shall be required to record a restrictive covenant that indicates a chloride reading exceeded the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency secondary standard (250 mg/L)under the National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations; 4. Installation of a source-totalizing meter flow; 5. On-going well monitoring for chloride concentration; 6. Submittal of flow and chloride data to the county per monitoring program; (IV) If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. (iv) Marrowstone Island. In addition to all voluntary and mandatory actions associated with the applicable SIPZ as described above, the following measures apply to all development proposals on Marrowstone Island that include groundwater withdrawal: Draft 6/26/06 44 (A) Voluntary Actions. (I) Installation of times together with new well pump installations to enable pump use limitation to low demand times. (B) Mandatory Actions. (I) The use of a well proposed as proof of potable water for a new building permit shall be conditioned through the building permit such that enrollment in a county- sponsored monitoring program is required, including periodic submittal of flow and chloride data as determined by the county. (II) Installation of a source-totalizing meter(flow). (III) Installation of a variable speed pump, controllable from the surface, in order to enable reduction of withdrawal rate, as may be necessary. (IV) Installation of a 1,000-gallon minimum storage tank that shall conform to the ANSI/NSF standard 61. (10) Mitigating Conditions. The administrator may require additional mitigating conditions, as needed, to provide protection to all critical aquifer recharge areas to ensure that the subject land or water use action will not pose a risk of significant adverse groundwater quality impacts. The determination of significant adverse groundwater quality impacts will be based on the antidegradation policy included in Chapter 173-200 WAC. (11) Authority for Denial. In all critical aquifer recharge areas, the administrator may deny approval if the protection standards contained herein or added mitigating conditions cannot prevent significant adverse groundwater quality impacts. [Ord. 6-03 §2; Ord. 3- 03 § 1; Ord. 9-02 § 1; Ord. 4-02 § 2; Ord. 11-00 § 3.6.5(d)] Article VI-F. Frequently Flooded Areas 18.15.260 Incorporation by reference. This Article VI-F incorporates by reference the classification, designation and protection provisions contained in the Jefferson County floodplain management ordinance (Chapter 15.15 JCC)with the following addition: (1) In addition to the insurance maps identified in the floodplain management ordinance (Chapter 15.15 JCC), flood hazard areas shall be identified with reference to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 100-year floodplain designations. Such flood hazard areas shall be subject to the criteria of the floodplain management ordinance. (2) The floodplain management ordinance conforms with the intent of the minimum guidelines (WAC 365-190-080(3))through directly considering the effects of flooding on human health and safety, together with effects on public facilities and services, through its protection standards. [Ord. 11-00 § 3.6.6(a)] 18.15.265 Relationship to other regulations. While the Jefferson County floodplain management ordinance requires consistency with all other applicable laws, in the event that a conflict should exist the stricter standard shall apply to the regulated development. [Ord. 11-00 §3.6.6(b)] Article VI-G. Geologically Hazardous Areas 18.15.270 Classification/designation. (1) Classification. Geologically hazardous areas shall be classified based upon a combination of erosion, landslide and seismic hazard. Draft 6/26/06 45 CLARK 5__ ._ _ LAND SURVEYING -.411111C 935. North Fifth avenue • P.O.Box 2199 MAPPING LAND Seguim, Washington 98382 DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING 44v.x Office(360) 681-2161 • Pax(360)683-5310 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT � OFFICE loll Free 1-888 681-2161 • E-mail info @clarklandcom PLLC _ .. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Ms. Michelle Farfan Date: July 24, 2012 Jefferson County DCD Re: Mauney Short Plat & Brown 621 Sheridan Short Plat Port Townsend, WA 98368 Enclosed are the following items: Copies Date Description 2 of Pg. 1 5/28/12 18 X 24 Review Copy of Preliminary S.P. for Wayne S. Brown 2 6/5/12 18 X 24 Review Copy of Preliminary S.P. for Mauney/Rogerson Trust TECEIIVE JUL 252012 Remarks: JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Please feel free to call if you have any questions. // " I Signed 4/4/1iJu Sharon Stevens for Scot Clark 1 MLA/12-68 LAM/FORY FOR.- MA UNE Y/R O GER S ON TRUST IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M•, JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON 9^1 P N n A OCARTER CORNER ,'°y a, FOUND 4's 4'CONCRETE "---1 IN ,* ICON IN ALUMINUM CASE Ir� G MOEN ROAD I 2 R CENTER OF SECTION 9 FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT IN NORTH Ls I ∎IN m ALUMINUM CASE. (7/25/09) THE S iii JUN 1 9 2012 N� ., JW FOUND 11/2"BRASS CAP WITH PUNCH �^ n. IN MONUMENT WELL. (1/23/09) , MONUMENT LIES 509'31'711, 279• JEFFERSON C)LINTY FROM TRUE 1/16TH CORNER EIRE Ka GRAM N ° DEPT.OF COMMUNITY•EVELOPMENT150 7 0 150 ILi .LOGE OF O 587-52'44T RES L7o,H2 �" SCALE IN FEET 9 1'r---vsmb,� 120232' L. } 419..X1' 22 882.02' DISNEY//RCI4D 15' F/ ////////// ry p D .R' A 0RANUCf DITCH SS 0 0 10 0 p2 '11 O es S 1J. [ '0 O Ry 10 ia .A LOT J 1EAC£.YA➢'F. 137.307 sq. ff. O N b. 10.04 acres 4S 2/20/11 LOT 2 ! i a °' 485.853 sq. R. i§. 8 0 11.75 acres ,.�DRVNAGE DITCH I N 5(PR Np-�eq�� X2_73 1 I CALCULATED POSITION OF A NON1N ENO ELEC K 15' f l "a 0 GOVT L� �y REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED. A. WOOD PLS '.r !P-buvar Mb 0, of 109 �.�• 17911 PER VOLUME 31 OF II •i LOISII G M;gpMG IS ` SURVEYS. PAGE 109. :��11M'N SU 1094016 A 58TSJ'.317 E nq RFU -, IyN 91 15.00' I LOT 1 N `\1 L13 • 581.569 aq. N. N LINE TABLE E Or ASPNU7 ■ E 1535^acres ' DITCH �N LINE BEARING LENGTH ROAD PER HQO \I N / 1 ySO LINE OF LI NSJ'01'41T 19.17'• te:5]/tq/I]. 02 714B'39'39'E 69 07' o05I1L `9 VEGETATION L3 N5518'047 98.71' am• L4 N50'30'51'E 66.26' DENPLOING \ +� V0 5 L5 NSPJO JIT 96.05' \ • _et° L6 N54•55.507 62.53' A 0 ,,0� 50a4 L7 N51•40'JOT 9562' n. 6 g� 10 E( L8 Ni9'07'74T 62.71' WSW iq E , ' T(t0 EO \(`1L L9 N5I'10'251- 127.84' NM R' Imo, sruas �§ 5(-/��(G� ' L70 7151'16'717 52.97' Eb1yq U` (RP LII N50411.035 92.70• S/RUC'n+K �� 072 N18iB'32T ]L6J' WARIER CORNER L15 NS I'bL87 29.57' CALCULATED POSITION PER VOL. 7 OF SURVEYS, Oq �'� LINE OF PAGE 107 1 V' VEGETATION 91 LEGEND: 51151' �� • DENOTES FOUND 5/8'RESAR WON PLASTIC SURVEY CAP STAMPED 16 S67-51'055 / A WOOD 2.3917'. (7/22/09) 0 • DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND AND ACCEPTED AS NOTED. (7/23/09) VICINITY MAP 5 DENOTES TEST PIT LOCATION PER JSF ENGINEERING(4/24/12) NO SCALE �, I,>';'.,.;•1 DENOTES EXISTING GRAVEL ORNEWAY PER FIELD TIES 1/23/09. /2 �� 1 �k ® RECORDED UNDER AFN 15962 RIGHT OF WAY PER DEED El 4 �� NOTES; 1.THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED BY FIELD TRAVERSE METHODS USING A 5 A SECOND TOPCON CATS-275W TOTAL STATION AND STEEL TAPE. �a 41 2.FOR ESSI5 OF BEARING AND SECTION$ERSON KW COUNTY. SEE V17L. 7 OF'�(1 SURVEYS. PAGE IOI, G AND SECTION OF N SUBSON CI DATA,wASIbIGTON.7 OF ALSO SEE UNRECORDED SURVEY BY J.T. LAY DATED IGIRCH 1948 ON FILE WON X f 0 THE JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE. VT .p IV. JUNE 8, 2012 SHEET I OF T N.T.S.�.Rq/151! � ..■� r'* RK .v 11 m �,dP I LAND SVRVErnG {AJM1f Mean u"ce of ,`\ A 1 MAPPING `xo)ee1-rzie� 1 .•• X DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING 0 /11} " ee0-!M0 $UBJEC �� GGNSTRUCTON MANAGEMENT CE'i �(ue)xi->,e, VW DRAM 9Y: XS PROPERTY 9(19N-1E) L.N SERE: 01E2909-MRUIC�S,.15S0-02101] road Page 1 of 1 ADDRESS INFORMATION FOR 91 BALDWIN RD ROAD NUMBER: C581709 ROAD NAME: BALDWIN RD ADDRESS: 91 APT: REAL MILE POST .09 LF APPLICANT: BALDWIN, F.A. ADDRESS CREATION DATE: 03/28/03 PARCEL: 921094026 LEGAL: LOT 1 GRID: F-5-D FIRE DIST: 1 ZIP: 98358 POSTAL DISTRICT: PORT LUDLOW PLANNING AREA: VOTING DIST: CEMETERY DIST: HOSPITAL DIST: SCHOOL DIST: WATER DIST: SITE LONGITUDE: SITE LATITUDE: SITE COORDINATE TYPE: ACCESS LONGITUDE: ACCESS LATITUDE: MODIFY DELETE ADDRESS NAME SEARCH REPORTS http://i sserver/address/RoadAddressDetail.asp?ROAD_NUMBER=C5 81709... 3/5/2012 road Page 1 of 1 ROAD LOG INFORMATION FOR DISNEY RD ROAD NUMBER P48 ROAD NAME. DISNEY RD CROSSROAD NUMBER C594209 CROSSROAD. ROBBINS RD CROSSROAD MILE POST. 0.9 CROSSROAD LEFT OR RIGHT RT ROAD LENGTH: 0.32 GRID ROAD STARTS: F-5-D MODIFY DELETE ADDRESS SEARCH ROAD SEARCH CREATION DATE SEARCH http://isserver/address/RoadDetail.asp?ROAD_NUMBER=P48 3/5/2012 } CC H O Ll N JO Z LI- — O H O CO —7 O O a) — CV CO —) L1J O U — CO J O O L C 0 cc 0 -I-. b) Z `�J C U 0 = H W O 0 CO 1 +' 'O H Ql O I ,�l 7 JC L L cn \ 1� f� ¢ J7 C.) U U W Z O CC O J CL 0- H F— O U 0 co a) a) t` a) a 0 O C) U I— I CC rn L1J C = 3 m D H CO O LLJ H CO 0 CO J U 0 LLJ J CO 0 ¢ Z I— C7) C M O U H W CO >. .- LJJ CC 3 W O LLJ >- CV CO ¢ 3 F- (r � ¢ F— m ¢ f cn cn 3 -o 2 O LLJ LLJ CO O Z O C LL NI- _1 LU CC Z O Cr LIJ CL O) O W CO CC I— O CO O O I— W ¢ 0 CI7 CC >- Y .. 2 I— X \ O >- CC L U ¢ U CO CL CV LLJ 7 CO ¢ ¢ W W CO 0 O Q) CO 0 I— Z CD O J O J CV CC 0 CC LJJ 0 O 2 Y O = ¢ CO F— I— ¢ CC \ ¢ ¢ U W "O O) X LJJ = 7~ O 2 CC U N } I— N J L1J W I— LLJ O) CL U Z Z CO I— O I— Z co CO 2 z 0 cn CC CU O7 O 0 7 0_ O ¢ >- ¢ O CO CO J ¢ ++ • U M J M CV CL M CO — ++ O (O O CO N O O O) CV C7) 0 Z 0 N ¢ C7) O CO O O O 0 O O -O L .— O) U m CV ,— CV 7) # C O Z a) L 3 s_ = C — m O -I CU ¢ a) a) 7) a) — 7) E L O o O a) -O > O o L L Q — O CO C2 L o ca X +. U -O X O CO CL (0 .— -- CO a) I— I— X I— u7 O (F- PRE 12-00004 Pre-Application Conference JAMES REYNOLDS 2-Lot Short Plat Attendees: Jim Pearson DPW; Randy Marx EH, Michelle Farfan DCD for Jefferson County. Terry McHugh (Representative), & Marc Mauney & Lynne Rogerson (applicants) March 20, 2012 @ 9:30am Owner/Applicant: Marc Mauney Lynne rogerson 2133 Oak Bay Road Port Hadlock, WA 98339 (360) 385-5032(h) Description of Proposal: The proposal is to subdivide a 34-acre parcel into three residential parcels under a Short Plat. Two lots will consist of approximately 10- acres and the third parcel will consist of approximately 14 acres. Proposed Lot 1 has a single family residence and an ADU with other improvements on it and Proposed Lots 2 & 3 are vacant. The lots are proposed to be served by the PUD Quimper public water system with individual on-site septic systems. Proposed lot 1 — SEP03-63 & BLD03-188 (main SFR was built in 1900) Proposed lot 2 — N/A Proposed lot 3 — N/A Existing water system is PUD Quimper public water system ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH o Water—PUD #1 (360-385-5800) o Septic issues (Randy—phone: 360-385-9402) o EH fees are charged at time of application. (Randy—phone: 360-385-9402) PUBLIC WORKS (Jim Pearson—phone: 360-385-9162): o Roads, access, transportation and stormwater. o DPW fees are charged at time of permit application; hourly rate of$79 charged at 5 hours plus. FIRE DEPARTMENT: o Fire Protection, access, hydrants DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION—LAND USE o Zoned—Rural Residential 1:10 o JCC 18.35.090 Article III — Short Subdivisions • Preliminary plat prepared by a licensed surveyor • Submit a substantially complete application Environmentally Sensitive Areas: Reynolds Short Plat Page 1 of 2 o Conservancy shoreline designation: o Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Buffer: 150 feet + 5 foot bldg setback line as measured from OHWM. (JCC 18.22 .270(2)) o Eagle (Regulated by the Federal Government) o Wetland? (JCC 18.22.300 and as determined by DOE) o Stream? (JCC 18.22.270) Setbacks o Front yard building setbacks: 20 feet. Side yard building setbacks: 5 feet. Shoreline fish and wildlife habitat conservation buffer: 150 feet plus a 5 foot building setback. Bulk& Dimensional Standards o Building Height: 35' maximum o Maximum Area of Impervious Surface Coverage (%): 25% o Minimum of two parking spaces per SFR& ADU Final Short Plat Requirements o Installation of utilities: power, phone and water lines and meters o Any road improvements as required by either the PWD or Fire District o Preparation of final Mylar and copies by a licensed surveyor in Washington State o Any delinquent & current property taxes paid up to date for the year the plat is recorded in o Current title report or supplemental title report (30 days current of submittal of application and at time of mylar/copies submittal) o Current Auditor's recording fee of$128.00 (or as amended by the State) due at time of mylar submittal. Does not include road maintenance agreement recording fee or any other document recording fees, if required. Expiration of a Short Plat o Must be recorded within three (3) years from date of approval. No extensions allowed. Application & Fees: o Complete Application Includes: • Master Permit Application • Land Division Supplemental Application • Preliminary Short Plat Maps, 8 large, 18"x 24" copies and 1 reduce 11" x 17" • Environmental Health Subdivision Review Application • Certificate of Water Supply Utility Service completed by PUD, signed and dated • Title Report/Plat Certificate from title company (30 days current of application submittal) • Fees Due at time of application $3,309.00 (See attached worksheet) Reynolds Short Plat Page 2 of 2 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT These fees are effective January 1 , 2012 and are subject to change. SUBDIVISION REVIEW FEE WORKSHEET DATE: 3 1 Q //9„. Pre-Application #: TWto - oy Applicant Name and/or Authorized Representative: � �� (maro / 1,qt) y T PROJECT TYPE FEE REQUIRED PROJECT TYPE FEE REQUIRED Long Plat Base Fee 6,364.00 Short Plat Base Fee 1,998.00 L L?S, (A) HEALTH DEPARTMENT Subdivision Review Base 31,T> 3sto. Binding Site Plan / PRRD's 6,364.00 _ $386.00 Plus $76.00 Per Lot , Final Short Plat, Long Plat, Boundary Line Adjustment BSP & PRRD 222.00 a2 , (A) Review Fee $152 plus $76per lot Notice of Application 149.00 (y {, GO PRRD Review Fee 152.00 Density Exemption Review Fee 152.00 Hearing Notice 149.00 requiring field work Notice Boards # X $10.00 10, (lj Density Exemption Review Fee 76.00 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PUBLIC WORKS SEPA Checklist 740.00 Short Plat (over 5 hrs/$79 per hr) 316.00 31.(Q,(,&) Long Plat 5-8 Lots: covers first 790.00 10 hours. (11+ hours = $79 per SEPA Hourly Rate 74.00 hour**) Long Plat 9 or More Lots: covers 1,580. first 20 hours. (21+ hours + $79 per hour**) **Hourly fee to be billed SUBTOTAL #1 „Z37Q.' CO SUBTOTAL #2 730, Subtotal Column #1 a..7)7(, Subtotal Column #2 4`30,(,6 GRAND TOTAL 3/3 oc;(A) Other fees (but not limited to payable before final recording: Environmental Review: Additional hourly charge may apply—see Hourly Rate. Minimum recording fee $128.00 Taxes paid up to date for the year the plat is to be recorded Cost of survey-see a licensed surveyor Cost of road construction,storm drainage, erosion control, etc. Cost of any required reports (geo-tech,wetland,eagle management,etc.) Cost of school and fire district fees(if applicable). G:I PLNCNTR IFEESISUBFEE_01-01-2012.doc Page 1 of 1 co T L 1 •'..t s 5 lita 0N.) isca e P`e L 13sn,,A0_,"1 o°na 5 J\A l.(Li' f h-.1-10k. W 3y+ 1 f0 xQ, 3 ��rC,.t, SVIIr k- PLo- 4 To.1-01 LoT I Lk A-c,.5 I- T, Lor 2_ . )0 4- OK S.• a .OT 3 ® : e.c S , f / Li 1302, 38 ACCEPTED AS 1/16TH C . ROBBINS ROAD��O SOUTH LINE GOV,r LOT z S87'53' 32'E FND 1' IRON PIPE OV x`59 _ -_ _ •DI` EY RIAD 20' EASEMENT FOR I,E 6 U ° m 48 563.33 - 211.46N 7 o 30 to S Ii N /� 2 .2 y P Lo� �' I1C!P Fil I~ 12e 3 `O M V '/ 1?-14A is ��v ?rot° I • Q gg<o � •► w II ���� �� 0 416 in ° m - GI Ile \Aieti Pt64 I (n fp�-rF \\ ° 124 ' •49 1 P GOV' T LOT 1 0 ITl `� \ o n v !-1 ,r CD 1, /i S ADIRiESS SIGN 91 �� N n7 In � T En _ ° APN 921-094-001 -D CU z = 'c=":: < < w c� tiU q �JG J S° °� F.= C N I 'O O l� \ ..o ��ll 117 /n co m ,uL A ' SEPTIC TANK LIDS 47�� W ° 54 OLD M6 j Y N/ Y ice— , j 0� 30 •_ °IlB V B J L 1 P SHED T7 \ `Qe N 6/ �„ \ P SM I�SHED �r / 3_ °119 ill� { l1NKI,� ,125 " \ GARAGE SHED /\"C n r X7. TANK o°121 ,,,_��•CU V HOUSE ��4\ 4R" l.7 N ° �a p y 120 $ +,`pe \ W N W V ce cp P 3- W • 123 ° pee \ � I a' N \V{ Pt` `^ O V) W \ ` :3 r Z ❑ 0 P N -nb 591,5,, L I� 30 • ..0. . 122 y F�`t +' 506. 43 is / a o 4a ` S87'51'05*E > 4/ • 143.83 • 264. 14 N 0 50 100 200 0 3Q0 FOUND T.N5 J. LAY IRON PIPE SET 5/8' WITH A.WD A. WD LAP 0.3' EAST WASH, STATE PARKS >Jo SCALE: 1 - i FIELD PROCEDURES: INI SW1/4SE1/4, SECTION 9, T. 29 N. , R. 1 E. , W, M. RECORD OF SURVEY On THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED BY FIELD TRAVERSE BASIS FOR BEARINGSI CALC. BEARING OF N2'26' 18'E ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-094-001, KNOWN AS THE USING A SOCKIA SET3E 3 SECOND ELECTRONIC TOTAL 1346, 81 FEET BETWEEN E FOUND 6CASED EN MONUMENTS AT OLD PLACE WASHINGTON. GOV' T LOT 1, SECTION 9 111 STATION THE0LITE AND STEEL TAPE. PRECISION MEETS OR EXCEEDS THOSE REQUIRED BY VAC 332-130-090. E. MARROWSTONE ROADS. PER VOL. 7 OF SURVEYS P. 101. FOR A. JEFFREY RIVES BENNETT I TEAL L. HO INS o` "°w NO. J11 ; WOOD SURVEYING I NC, AUDITOR' S CERTIFICATE SURVEYOR' S CERTIFICATE �, c11 THIS HAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY S-suF^',4q�'Jp ; 2135 DISCOVERY RD, PORT TOWNSEND, WA. 98368 < II III III IIIN I III Inn 11 5 1 83 50 MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION IN CONFORMANCE , 4O PHONE 360-385-5968 FAX 360 360-379-5659 - ry ` 31 PG 109 WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SURVEY e 12,00:2008 02.0 RECORDING ACT AT THE REQUEST OF. - �., LEGEND 0 SET 5/8' REBAR AND CAP 'A. WOOD PLS 23911' f 2JNH 9 JEFFREY BENNETT + fraY,fi. § ()FOUND MONUMENT IN STREET WELL ON SEPT. 21, 2006 I' :'� :5 • SET 5 FOOT STEEL FENCE POST ON PROPERTY LINE I'MIMED ILIn OS I�JY"'M"'EPUTY�. ' 4vvv..,..,,,�,,,,w,,,,,Ps 0 FOUND IRON PIPE MONUMENT DEPUTY JEFFERSON COUNTY AUDITOR I Z(S ��' ° SET 3/8' REBAR OR PK NAIL FOR SURVEY CONTROL POINTS Michelle Farfan From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 2:06 PM To: 'Terry McHugh' Subject: Pre-app meeting for Mauney Hi Terry: I have scheduled the pre-app on Tuesday March 20 at 9:30am in the DCD conference room. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner,FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan@co,jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473 (fax) All voice messages and e-mails received by Jefferson CountY maY be subject to public Disclosure under Chapter 42.5612CW. Please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am -4:30 pm Monday to Thursday and closed on Fridays. 1 Michelle Farfan From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 1:56 PM To: 'Robert Low' Subject: RE: Pre-application conference for proposed 3-lot short plat Hi Bob: I just sent an email of the scheduled day and time for this pre-app. I don't know if you want to attend. The parcel is at the southern end of Marrowstone Island and is shoreline property. Disney Road abuts the northern boundary and the western boundary abuts Baldwin Road. There are existing houses and other out buildings on the parcel. It is mostly cleared land. Can you let me know if you plan on attending the meeting and if you are do you want me to mail you the packet or do you want to pick it up here at the DCD office? Michelle Farfan Associate Planner,FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 622 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan@cojefferson.wa.us 360-379-9957 360-3794973(fax) All voice messages and 8-mails received by Jefferson County maY be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter et2.56'RCW Please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1,2ooe. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am -'f:30 pm MondaY to ThursdaY and closed on Fridays. From: Robert Low [mailto:rlow @ejfr.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 9:37 AM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: RE: Pre-application conference for proposed 3-lot short plat Michelle I have just returned to work and reading my emails can you fill me in on this? R Low From: Michelle Farfan [mailto:mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 9:23 AM To: Jim Pearson; Susan Porto; Robert Low Subject: Pre-application conference for proposed 3-lot short plat Importance: High Hi: 1 I have a pre-app for a 3-lot short plat located on Marrowstone Island; north boundary abuts Disney Road and the western boundary abuts Baldwin road. The southern boundary abuts Admiralty Inlet. The parcel is approximately 34-acre in size. Tuesday and Thursday's work best with the representative, Terry McHugh. Here's a few dates to choose from: 3/13 after 3:30pm 3/20 between 9am and noon or after 3:30pm 3/22 anytime 3/27 between 9am and noon or after 3:30pm Please let me know what day works best so I can confirm the date and a room. Thanks. Michelle Farfan Associate'Planner,FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan@cojefferson.wa.us 360-379-4457 360-379-4473(fax) All voice messages and e-mails received by Jefferson County may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56RCW. Please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am - 4:3o pm Monday to Thursday and closed on Fridays. 2 Michelle Farfan From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 1:57 PM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: RE: Wetland report for a Pre-app (PRE12-04) Hi Michelle: I would suggest for the pre-app that you let the applicants and their representative know that DCD reviews all special reports submitted (for permitting)for compliance with 1CC requirements for critical areas, and that this review includes a site visit to the property. If the applicants want to know prior to submitting an application if DCD agrees with the 5NR Company report,then they can pay for a Special Report Review(the first 3 hours,or $222, must be prepaid with any additional time to be billed on an hourly basis). Otherwise,the special report will be reviewed during the consistency review of the entire proposal. Let me know if you have any questions. Donna,Frog-tun-lnv .Assoctate Planner/lVettand Specialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 S(iertdan Street Port Tinvrisencf, Wtstiiington 98368 dfrostho1m.aco.efferson.wa.us 360.379.4466 Department of Community Development is open from 9:00 to 4:30 Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. All e-mails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 9:30 AM To: Donna Frostholm Subject: Wetland report for a Pre-app (PRE12-04) Iii Donna: I have a pre-app for a 3-lot short plat located on Marrowstone Island. The parcel is approximately 34- acres and has a SFR & an ADU with several out-buildings. The wetland report by SNR Company dated 8/25/2011 states there is not a wetland on-site; county maps identify a wetland. Can you review the report and see if you concur. I don't necessarily need to have the answer before the pre-app but it would be helpful. I'm working on dates to schedule the pre-app most likely the week of 3/19. Thanks. 1 Michelle Farfan Associate'Planner,FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan 'Port Townsend WA, 98368 mfarfan @Co.jefferson.wa•us 360-379-9457 360-379-9473 (fax) All voice messages and e-mails received by Jefferson County may be subject to'Public Disclosure under Chapter 92.56RCW please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am -4:30 pm Monday to Thursday and closed on Fridays. 2 Michelle Farfan From: Michelle Farfan Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 10:27 AM To: 'Terry McHugh' Subject: Pre-app for Mauney Hi Terry: Can you send or email me a copy of that wetland report for this proposed subdivision? I'm working on the pre-app and will let you know this week when the meeting and time scheduled. Thanks. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner,FHM Lead Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan port Townsend WA 98368 mfarfan@cojefferson.wa.us 360-379-4957 360-379-9473 (fax) All voice messages and e-mails received by Jefferson County may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56RCW. Please note that DCD hours changed as of December 1, 2008. Our office is open to the public 9:00 am -4:30 pm Monday to Thursday and closed on Fridays. I�I 1 1 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TIME SHEET Date Tun Comments g--,33 -1 D- /2 hr un-rdco ( I I 31 I I VItte,0 pAg---aff •• ri. MIFTIZETWININIIPME3 0 cf -- chIca,u4A, 4 hoof floc ) 01i' 36 ' c� sd.t Las • .i„! A; • -- �p �'dif,d ,e- - /LA!! - . ,! . aid , I �► bi&itu,y GO - Pn vic,utu • UDC CONSISTENCY REVIEW- - Project Planner: Master#PRE12-00004 Review Type Protect Description Ilk PRE12-00004 PRE APPLICATION FOR SHORT PLAT 114/11 $ Primary: MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE Site Address: 40, illr LYNNE ROGERSON TRUSTEE 91 BALDWIN RD 2133 OAK BAY RD NORDLAND WA, 98358 PORT HADLOCK WA 98339-9778 TERRY MCHUGH REP P O BOX 441 PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368 Project Location: Parcel number 921 094 026, Lot 1, in Section 9, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM, located on Baldwin Rd,Nordland, WA 98358-9608 Parcel Number: 921094026 S-T-R: 9-29N-01E Total Acreag■ 34 Legal Description S9 T29 R1E LOT 1 SUBJ TO EASE Land Use: 1100 Flood District: Fire District: 1 Planning Area: 3 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: School 49 Zoning: COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: VLALC. tu COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: /yUGUGATrans MPR: WATER SUPPLY UTILITY: Service Area t..) 1 PUD: [ Plot plan states"property line" 4 Assessor's Map (Property iin . : submitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the Assessor's 1/4 map) S,, Legal Access to Prope NO Parcel Tags or Scanned l►: 1 ments YES NO t• ESA's: Special Re..-�..: ,earby YES NO Designated Ag YES WM s. Shoreline Designatio e.,NO 1 .,.4A. A, 0 44_, Shoreline Slope S NO A�n , _ - Stream Type YE,,„...„� Fish&Wild 0 i<t �� N O 0 I+ ti ineA Rare Plants:Y;ES-: Seismic: QE2.2S NO i l. ,. .'11.1....' Landslide: YES • • Flood: YES IN��t Erosion: YES t I� Aquifer Recharge Ar_ 0 A UW� _ _ SIPZ: 4• : At Risk High Risk Coast-7 CMZ: non:+ -1. •isk M. . .te Risk P isconnected CMZ Stormwater site plan submitted: Y sNo Forest Lands: YES 41 Adjoining Forest Lands: Commercial/ Rural/ Inholding Mineral Lands: YES l�• Agricultural Lands: YES ir (Archaeology: YES 0 /l Stormwater: New Impervious Surface_ /Land Disturbing Activity_lD/ ESA's • JJ Stormwater Req's: Min Req#2 Min Req#1 thru#5 Min Req#1 thru#10 Engineerin Notice Provisions/Disclosur Anport YES in 'IL YES tw Forest Lands YES H o, Landscaping Required:Yes ' Parking Spaces R NO 2 Other low _ Building Height: 5' UBC Standar . cb4 Impervious Surface coverage percentage: 01...S9 O Resource Lands&Public: 10% Rural Residential: 25% Rural Industrial: Per UDC Sec 6.7 Rural Commercial: 60%�/ Area of Building Coverage:60%in Rural Industrial Lands only `�/ . '\Total Building(s)Size:��J RVC:20,000 SF CC:5,000 SF NC:7,500 SF GC:10,000 SF All otherssulled l septic&water corstrairts/Nors speci ed �'' I Setbacks: Front:,2.0 Left Side: Right Side: Rear: R/ 4. Shoreline Setback: lST' LSHA Setback: J.�(n Road Classification: ►_.. o. t _ 6.4 J : ■ ■ _ 0 ° ,. I 144 Pn�' Y T1 Va Road Approach:ExiSTING • •!_r__■D RAP A (Pe/ l SEPA Required:Y EXEMPT 1 7 0 Flood Certificate: J( 1 /,, Existing Case(s) &Con on(s): E� Li j3 Violations: Yes Recorded Date of Subdivision: /0 yi—AFN Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions: <5yrs=Plat Conditions on plat or Old Or' ance �� Lots/Require Declaration of Restrict' - Covenant YES mitted: YES NO UGA No Protest Agreement �.-ii►0, submitted: YES NO ,� Site Visit conducted YES �•' IV ADMIN:Setbacks entered in PermitPlail.� 7 /A New Parcel Tags entered in ' it Plan YES Special Reports Scanned er YES No parcel tags found for parcel Associated CASES status issued finaled description 921094026 MLA03-00146 SEP03-00063 F 4/25/2003 10/15/2003 EES 4/22/08 MLA03-00147 PRJ03-00059 P ADU W/ATTACHED GARAGE RAP03-00075 F 4/30/2003 1/14/2005 ROAD APPROACH&911 -BALDWIN RD MLA12-00006 ZON12-00002 F 1/31/2012 1/31/2012 CODE INTERPRETATION-Marrowstone Island Subdivision Moratorium and Public Water The code interpretation is not parcel specific. PRE12-00004 P PRE APPLICATION FOR SHORT PLAT SOM03-00063 F 150 1 �&)MC3 SON c. 152 �� c6. JEFFERSON COUNTY �5- 0-3 0.4� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4. 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend •Washington 98368 (02:1 "Q.SN C,,VO 360/379-4450 . 800/831-2678 . 360/379-4451 Fax — Pre-Application Conference The Jefferson County Unified Development Code (UDC) requires that before an application is made for all Type II and Type Ill project applications and Type I applications proposing impervious surfaces of ten thousand (10,000) square feet or more and/or non-single family structures of five thousand (5,000) square feet or more, a pre-application consultation must be held. The consultation includes relimina review and administrative assistance. This service does not include P rY extensive field inspection or correspondence. Pre-application consultation does not limit subsequent administrative review. At the conference, Department of Community Development personnel shall provide the applicant with: (1) A list of the requirements for a completed application; (2) A general summary of the procedures to be used to process the application; (3) The references to relevant code provisions or development standards that may apply to the approval of the application; and (4) A list of any applicable hourly review fees that may be charged by one or more County agencies upon the filing of a project permit application with the County. Discussions at the conference or the information provided by the staff shall not bind or prohibit the County's future application or enforcement of all applicable laws and regulations. No statements or assurances made by County representatives shall in any way relieve the applicant of his or her duty to submit an application consistent with all relevant requirements of County, state and federal codes, laws, regulations and land use plans. NAME: {'14,rG '-lLli�1 J1 {/1 t��JW�=,p 26 Q�i2,,•1-(50'� MAILING ADDRESS: 2l"; 3 UNf4 Al OVV?.- PO∎FT 1 3-lo�-? why- `t933' TELEPHONE: (HOME) 3 VS ;- b 31Z- J _ (WORK) �'f c'4 4 1 q 4 1 -J0(— I 7(=.3 REPRESENTATIVE: 14!!Pi(I Mc-141L J MAILING ADDRESS: P 0 460 a— vc J �'0 r� TebC.v J1 se Vlc1- U'J B k •Q� TELEPHONE: (HOME) 360 3I�t—t(5t) (WORK) 3Co - 701 -' 1"76"3 DIRECTIONS 1. Please answer all questions on this form completely. C E VE \\1 2. Attach a sketch of the Conceptual Design for the proposed use or activity, showing th foll g liF nTmation: a. Vicinity sketch; b. North arrow and scale; I - B 2 3 2012 c. Property boundaries and identification of land uses on adjacent properties; IJ �� ' _J d. Means of ingress and egress; e. Property/lot drainage; JEFFERSON COUNTY f. Possible locations of sewage disposal and water supply systems; DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT g. Location of utility easements;and h. Proposed location of buildings, including setbacks to property boundaries. 3. Attach payment of the applicable fee, as set forth in the Jefferson County Fee Ordinance. PRE-APP CONFERENCE.DOC REV.04/22/2003 Page 1 Property Description General Location: 3`I} ac-S, 9\ 3zt, sf\ R-c., NorL14, J 3C% • &Oyu,∎n 11c;, I \SJ■12,1 Legal Description(from Property Tax Statement): PrP 42 - 09y- o2to Sec. °l T. 29 rJ fZ'�V—wo-) 9-Digit Parcel Number(from Property Tax Statement): Total Acreage: S k ± Zone: %Lot Coverage: Applicant: -Owner ❑ Lessee ❑ Contract Purchaser 2{-Other '-fir-/-1 14144/' seev, Project Description '21tnel a V-G* 3cA tiJci-le. 1444-wQC1 sC. ✓ot t' ,Cz eo ` � U • T-ye_ 2 Q./LC 5 4-V•^-is l�l S J kpi c-4" ()() 5J(Oitc-It' Sh &.rc Q Wo- sik -C- o Property Owner(name and mailing address): 4 Jf\I M l (2,01.eAJ ')j QtJ, c- J -{"emu Sf -7-(33 o4t'- gq.c,\ ad . Pnr'T I�a�(ec( t W�- '14;')37.1 Standard Disclosure J Information provided to a prospective applicant during the pre-application consultation is based on County regulations in effect at the time of the pre-application consultation. Revised or new County regulations could affect a future development application. A pre- application consultation does not vest a future development application. By signing the application form,the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. • I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities, judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees, representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. This right of entry shall expire when the County (through the Administrator or the Administrator's representatives)concludes the application has complied with all applicable laws and regulations. Access and right of entry to the applicant's property shall be requested and shall occur only during regular business hours. (SIGNATURE) (DATE) I hereby designate i ear �I "\Gclev y L. to act as my agent in matters related to this pre-application conference. l I (LANDOWNER SIGNATURE) (DATE) Ili FEB 23 2012 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PRE-APP CONFERENCE.DOC REV.0412212003 Page 2 II IIM11 Hi 11111 II I I II 1IIIII 109 J.ff.r,on COunl Y, WA PUD Ri OF JEFFERSON NOT 19 00 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO Public Utility District No. 1 of Jefferson County P.O. Box 929 Port Hadlock, WA 98339-0929 NOTICE In order to ensure that future owners of the property described below are awars f following information,this notice is filed against the title of the property. z—_____ This property requires an alternative technology septic system to se ,the waste water!need of the homesite. State of Washington Department of Health reguns regarding alternative technology septic systems require that scheduled,periodic monitoring be established. In Jefferson County, Public Utility District No.1 (PUD) provides the needed monitoring service as a contract service. A contract exists between ALAN BALDWIN AND RUTH E.BALDWIN property owners and the PUD to accomplish this monitoring service. ` ( 'mil In the event that the need for an alternative technology.septic tem orthe need for the periodic, schedules monitoring is canceled by the State of Washington, this notice shall be null and void. In the event that a general sewer system is installed,and serves.this property and replaces the alternative technology septic system as the means of treating ai}d/Qr disposing of the waste water generated upon the property,this notice shall be n 111141_,oi LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL#921094026,LOT 1 SUBJ (LESS 1 AC HOMESITE),SECTION 9, QTR SEY.., TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, 01 EAST, W.M. JEFFERSON COUNTY,WASHINGTON By action of the Board of Commissioner3-c4 g• c Utility District No. 1 of Jefferson County By Resolution adopted May 6, 1982. - . ' . / �1iu / ^`- O -m s G. Park.-r, M•nager STATE OF WAS I r 1ti COIJNTY OF e N I ackno : es G.Parker appeared before me and signed this notice for the provisIo o'MIT •ci Oversight for an On-Site Septic System on this day. \��,� , Dated S' 2.9-- 2-OO — , ..444:29,O ,It if OVfiq= . r; Notary Pu tic in and for the State of #� ; ; Washington,residing in Port Hadlock r4i," .s 11 •C% My Appointment expires 07-11-2006 1,CW wAS4 = Notary Seal: L.S. • 558380 PGS : 2 WD 02/2112011 0a 01 PM 36300 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE JaIferson County WA Auditor's Orrin. - Donna Eldridge, Auditor ■0 '.II791UIh01:1C NAM!PC Mt VAN Ili 11111 When recorded return to: Marc Mauney and Lynne Rogerson,Trustees of the Mauney/Rogerson Revocable Living Trust 91 Baldwin Road Nordland,WA 98358 Jefferson County Excise Tax a Aff # _ a 9 __Qaie.. or Tax$u.'' (:O •• LIds stint$ i1 1.1 Filed for Record at Request of B 11111...0.e.A. .f , Ocputy e• urer All About Escrow,Inc. Escrow Number:11-0024 53016 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED (Not Statutory) THE Grantor Columbia State Bank as successor In interest to American Marin :ank i.consideration of TEN DOLLARS AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATION in hand paid, bargains, sells, and conveys to Marc Mauney and L rso,, 'rustees of the Manney/Rogerson Revocable Living Trust the following described est le, ituate4 i the County of Jefferson State of Washington: Government Lot I,In Section 9,Township 29 North,Rao I ast,W.61,1 cept the right of way for a public road granted to Jefferson County over the West 15 feet o th North 6 fee of said Government Lot I,as conveyed by deed recorded under the Auditor's File No. in Volu I f Road Waivers,page 54S, records of Jefferson County,Washington. Situate In the County of Jefferson,State of Washington. Lot I Legal: �� Lot!9-29-1E 5/Ease Tax Parcel Number(s).921094026 SUBJECT TO: SEE EXHIBIT"A"ATTAC ND MADE A PART HEREOF. O �� Dated: February 17,2011 Columbia State Bank ■ ) ± •• By Daniel Larsen,Assiata 'be Pr • 7111r Special Credits Offs - O (\ STATE OF W i,yAtyy, } COUNTY OF t'ICi[ 7 } SS: I certify that I know o sans ory evidence that Daniel Larsen signed this instrument, oat 1 ed that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Assistant VI,ay aid- tS.ecfal Credits Officer of Columbia State Bank to be the free d ;lift of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. Dated: �Ilu. • 4.! ��Oa v , �.\ ) ,r �� Notary Public i nd for th tate of Washington 41 "IST-7i NI RICH Residing at 3 'A`{ PUBLIC My appointment expires: S^. sFWA 4AGTON I1 OMM;Sa:u`. F:APiRES EPT:Mdc.915. 2012 UPS I6-05(i) 558380 Page 2 of 2 021281201104:01 PM EXHIBIT "A" SUBJECT TO: 1. Easement,including terms and provisions contained therein: Recorded: January 18, 1937 Recording No.: 79362 • In favor of: Puget Sound Power and Light Company,a Washington Corp? lion For: Electric transmission and/or distribution system . ___::---..4 \ The legal description in said easement is not sufficient to determine its exac ion witUiry said premises. 2. Easement,including terms and provisions contained therein: Recorded: May 28, 1943 Recording No.: 99789 CD For: A right of way � Affects; 20 feet wide over the Norther) 2 s feet of 'vernment Lot I 3• Easement,including terms and provisions contained the in. Recorded: January 27, 1947 Recording No.: 109336 For: Right of way Affects: 20 feet wide on the EastErl}�-line Lot I 4. Rights of the general public to the unrestricted(use,of e1L3he waters of a navigable body of water not only for the primary purpose of nay/Ps/stied,but also for corollary purposes;including(but not limited to)fishing,boating,bathing,switlim`ing,'watef skiing and other related recreational purposes,as those waters may affect the.lidefands,shorelands or adjoining uplands and whether the level of the water has been raised naturally artificially to a maintained or fluctuating level, all as further defined by the 4ecisiQnSI law'pf the state.(Affects all of the premises subject to such submergence) A cedar board fence eiteroadltes 14 42 feet into this property 5. Notice to Title and'the Tetrms aRsi'Conditions thereof: Recorded: ' Jurle,7,2004 Recording No.: ;'-- ,,gg54j4 Regarding: This property requires an alternative technology septic system to serve C the waste water needs of the homesite, 6. A recor4'of aprVe} recorded December 8,2006 under Recording No.518350,said survey discloses(ate following matters: Paste II III III INII VIII VIII I II 5451 of 45esP When Recorded Return t0: Je�lereon County Nerd JEFFERSON COUNTY THE CLAW 42.00 Jefferson County Assessor P.O.Box 1220 Port Townsend,WA 98368 Notice of Approval or Denial of Application for Cla'•ifi• • I n as Farm and Agriculture Land under RCW 84. I I i ) Property Owner Jeffrey R.Bennett and Teal L.Hoins _ Property Address 91 Baldwin Roa. Nordland, WA M__ Legal Description Section 9 Township 29N Range 1 East Nier Gov Lot 1 (Less 2-I acre homesites and wooded areas-app ttn@tel .t I Assessor's Property Tax Parcel or Account Number 921094026( (\J Your application for Farm and Agriculture classification hat: ` ® Approved in Whole Approv art ❑ Denied in Whole ' (n Denim Part Transferred from RCW 84.33 Partial Approval—Legal description for partial approval. Denial—A portion or all of the land describe has •-„ denied classification.Reason for denial: • Cf?0 • Appeal-A denial of an application as annAgricultural and A land may be appealed to the County I. Board of Equalization. The appeal piusLbe tiled within 30 days of the date of notice of denial or July 1 of the e t ye. , hichever is later. w / / .. •�, / r� 7 /I� /��___ . -a,. �.� s,_j / 9K/i 1 Assessor/ ul ' Dat Prepare in duplicate. led . •=d d to land owner, f approved,file original with auditor. When returned fro uait.r, :end ed owner a copy. Retain original with recording information. For tax assistance,vi 't htfa://dor.wi ao outent/taxes/orooerty/default.asox or call(360)570-5900. To inquire about the availability o doiaptent in an alternate format for the visually impaired,please call(360)705-6715. Teletype(TTY)users ma ca11,1-8e05451.7985. / - REV 640088e(w)(7/I� / Cases Associated with a Parcel Page 1 of 2 0 J Person Countye a, ` Weather Station ` Database.Tools Maps �.�.Webcam _ � Home County Info Departments Search] Cases Associated with Parcel No: 9.2.1094026 This may not be a complete listing of information that exists for this parcel. There may be other information pertinent to the property on file. Please contact the Department of Community Development for additional information. Case Number PRE12-00004 Description PRE APPLICATION FOR SHORT PLAT Last Name MAUNEY TRUSTEE Received Date 2/23/2012 No Images Case Number ZON12-00002 Description CODE INTERPRETATION - Marrowstone Island Subdivision Moratorium and Public Water The code interpretation is not parcel specific. Last Name MAUNEY TRUSTEE Received Date 1/4/2012 Images Case Number SOM03-00063 Description Last Name BENNETT Received Date 10/15/2003 No Images Case Number BLD03-00346 Description CARPORT (Port Cochere) Last Name BALDWIN Received Date 6/4/2003 No Images Case Number BLD03-00188 Description ADU W/ ATTACHED GARAGE http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ppquery/cm.asp?value=92... 3/5/2012 Cases Associated with a Parcel Page 2 of 2 Last Name BALDWIN Received Date 3/24/2003 No Images ........... ........... Case Number RAPO3-00075 Description ROAD APPROACH & 911 - BALDWIN RD Last Name BALDWIN Received Date 3/24/2003 No Images Case Number SEP03-00063 Description EES 4/22/08 Last Name BALDWIN Received Date 3/12/2003 Images Jefferson County HOME ( COUNTY INFO l DEPARTMENTS i SEARCH woe Best viewed with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 or later Windows - Mac http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ppquery/cm.asp?value=92... 3/5/2012 Assessor Detail Building #1 Page 1 of 2 Jefferson County WASHINGTON Weather Station Database Tools Maps a4 Webcam Home County Info Departments Search Assessor Detail Building #1 Parcel Number: 921094026 Building Number Year Built Year Remodeled 1 2004 0 Building Exterior Building Area Building Interior Building Type: HOUSE 1st Floor Area: 1250 Int. Walls (Cabin): Building Style: 1 STY 2nd Floor Area: 0 Heat: FORCED AIR Foundation:CONCRETE PERIM. 3rd Floor Area: 0 SIN. 1 STY. Exterior: SIDING/STUCCO (LAP) Loft Area: 0 Floor Cover (1): Roof Cover:METAL Attic Area: 0 Floor Cover (2): Total Area: 1250 Basement Area: 0 Building Rooms Mobile Home Garage Bedrooms: 3 Make: Type: Attached Full Baths: 2 Model: Area: 720 Half Baths: 0 Length: 0 Exterior: Siding/Stucco (Lap) Width: 0 Roof: Metal Year Built:0 Carport Square Footage: 506 Skirting: Area: 0 1st Addition 2nd Addition Type: Type: Area: 0 Area: 0 Year Built: 0 Year Built: 0 Exterior: Exterior: Roof: Roof: To view another building associated with this parcel. Select building : 1 2 3 Jefferson County HOME I COUNTY INFO I DEPARTMENTS I j SEARCH Best viewed with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 or later 0 Windows - Mac http://www.coj efferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/assessordetail.asp?Parcel_NO... 3/5/2012 • Assessor Detail Building #2 Page 1 of 2 r Jefferson County WASHINGTON - ._Weather Station Database Tools iski Maps + b Webcam Home County Info Departments Search Assessor Detail Building #2 Parcel Number: 921094026 Building Number Year Built Year Remodeled 2 1900 0 Building Exterior Building Area Building Interior Building Type: HOUSE 1st Floor Area: 1572 Int. Walls (Cabin): Building Style: 1.5 STY (FIN) 2nd Floor Area: 848 Heat: ELECTRIC BB/WALL Foundation:POST & BLOCK/PIERS 3rd Floor Area: 0 SIN. 2 STY. Exterior: SIDING/STUCCO (LAP) Loft Area: 0 Floor Cover (1): VINYL Roof Cover:COMPOSITON Attic Area: 0 Floor Cover (2): Total Area: 2420 Basement Area: 0 Building Rooms Mobile Home Garage Bedrooms: 2 Make: Type: Full Baths: 1 Model: Area: 0 Half Baths: 0 • Length: 0 Exterior: Width: 0 Roof: Year Built:0 Carport Square Footage: 0 Skirting: Area: 0 1st Addition 2nd Addition Type: Type: Area: 0 Area: 0 Year Built: 0 Year Built: 0 Exterior: Exterior: Roof: Roof: To view another building associated with this parcel. Select building : 1 2 3 Jefferson County HOME I COUNTY INFO I DEPARTMENTS I SEARCH Best viewed with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 or later Windows - Mac http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/AssessorDetai1B1d2.asp?Parc... 3/5/2012 CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR Parcel 921094026 Printed: February 27, 2012 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner SEP03-00063 MLA03-00146 BALDWIN F K RUSSELL Application Received: 3/12/2003 Permit Issued/Case closed: 4/25/2003 Case Finaled: 10/15/2003 EES 4/22/08 1.) Approval/issuance of a sewage disposal permit does not guarantee the approval of other development or a building permit on this site. Compliance with other Jefferson County and Washington State Codes is required. 2.) AS PER WAC 246-272 AND JEFFERSON COUNTY CODE 8.15 ALL SYSTEMS REQUIRE MONITORING. THIS MONITORING IS PROVIDED BY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE JEFFERSON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION AND THE JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT#1. THIS SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM WILL REQUIRE AN ACTIVE MONITORING CONTRACT WITH THE PUD#1 PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. While the County strongly recommends that the property owner allow inspectors to enter their property to inspect the system in order to insure that the system is functioning correctly, the property owner always has the right under the Fourth Amendment and our State Constitution, to refuse the inspectors access to their property. The property owner never loses the right to refuse access and can do so despite never having refused access before. 3.) As per Jefferson County Code 8.15 all onsite sewage systems require monitoring. Monitoring shall be provided by an approved entity. THIS SYSTEM IS REQUIRED TO BE INSPECTED AT 6 MONTHS, AT ONE YEAR AND EVERY 3 YEARS THEREAFTER. 4.) Health Dept. required to observe pressure test when system fully installed/complete, 48 hours notice to be provided for scheduling. 5.) An asbuilt drawing and certification of completion by the designer is required prior to final approval. 6.) Setbacks to all wells- 100' required from drainfield and reserve areas. 50' required from tanks and effluent transport lines. 7.) 10' separation required between a Water line and all portions of the onsite sewage system; effluent transport line, tanks, treatment and disposal components. 8.) Setback to surface waters- 100' required from drainfield and reserve areas. 50' required from tanks. 9.) Dry season installation required. 10.) When/if designated reserve area is utilized an alternative system providing an additional level of treatment may be required. 11.) A 30' setback shall be maintained from the disposal component and reserve area to any downslope footing, curtain or interceptor drain or drainage ditch. 12.) All components of the septic system are to be completely protected from vehicular traffic or mechanical disturbance. 13.) Drainlines are to be installed along the natural contours. 14.) Contact designer prior to installation for staking of drainfield area. 15.) Divert all sources of drainage, including roof drains away from septic tank and drainfield area. 16.) Any portion of transport line under a driven way is to be sleeved/cased or equivalent. 17.) Septic tank and pump chamber to be water tight. Extra protection (i.e. Bentonite)to be used around inlet, outlet, and risers due to high water table. 18.) Dose counters are required in the control panel for all drainfield components. 19.) Risers are required to grade with secured lids over both compartments and over the outlet of the septic tank for inspection and maintenance/monitoring. Minimum 20" riser over inlet. 20.) Approval of this sewage disposal permit does not preclude the permit holder from complying with the Unified Development Code for other/future development on the site. 21.) Compliance with the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Review conditions is required. 22.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County staff on 3/21/03 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Eagle Habitat, Wetlands, Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone (Coastal and High Risk). 23.) The project components are more than 250'from the mapped/identified wetland. The requirement for a wetland delineation and report is waived based on maintenance of a 225' buffer from the wetland per UDC Table 3-3. 24.) A permanent physical separation along the upland boundary of the wetland buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation can include installing logs, trees, a hedgerow, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 25.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 1 of 4 .Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 26.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the project shall follow the Best Management Practices(BMPs) and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (see attached). 27.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 28.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals (primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 29.) This proposal will not utilize a new well and therefore SIPZ conditions do not apply. 30.) An Eagle Management Plan has been submitted with this application. All conditions shall be followed in the approved plan. BLD03-00188 MLA03-00147 BALDWIN I F K RUSSELL Application Received: 3/24/2003 Permit Issued/Case closed: 5/5/2003 Case Finaled: 11/12/2003 ADU W/ATTACHED GARAGE 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on 3/24/03 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas(ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code(UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Wetlands, Eagle Habitat, and High Risk/At Risk and Coastal Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone (SIPZ). 2.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals(primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 3.) The parcel is located within a coastal SIPZ (seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy(Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002)that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but no history of chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in groundwater sources within 1000 feet. 4.) The parcel is located within an At Risk SIPZ (seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy(Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002) that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. An At Risk SIPZ is defined as: areas within 1,000 feet of a groundwater source with a history of chloride analyses between 100 mg/L and 200 mg/L (milligrams per liter). 5.) The parcel is located within a High Risk SIPZ(seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map. There are mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy(Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002)that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A High Risk SIPZ is defined as: areas within 1,000 feet of a groundwater source with a history of chloride analyses above 200 milligrams per liter(mg/L). 6.) The proposal will be connected to an existing well and a new well will not be installed, therefore, SIPZ conditions are not required. 7.) The applicant shall fully adhere to all conditions and requirements of the eagle habitat management plan. 2 of 4 .Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 8.) The project is located in close proximity to an identified wetland and is subject to the delineation provisions of Section 3.6.9 of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. Based upon the proposed location of the project in relation to the identified wetland, the applicant has agreed to maintain a buffer(setback)that exceeds the standard buffer requirements by fifty(50) percent. The applicant acknowledges the additional setback and agrees to maintain the extra 50 percent buffer, therefore, waiving the wetland delineation requirements of the Unified Development Code. 9.) All construction activities shall not encroach upon the buffer. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. 10.) A permanent physical separation along the upland boundary of the wetland buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation can include installing logs, trees, a hedgerow, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 11.) Buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred (100) feet, whichever is less. Signs shall contain the following statement: "Wetland & Buffer- Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 12.) The applicant is proposing to create or add 4,560-square feet of impervious surface. Sections 6.6 and 6.7 of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code requires that your proposal submit a Small Parcel Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan. 13.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices(BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 14.) A Small Parcel Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan has been submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan and contact the Jefferson County Department of Community Development to arrange a schedule to inspect the property for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Department verifies plan compliance. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 15.) The site plan as submitted with the building application on 3/24/03 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated 4/24/03 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 16.) This approval is for a Accessory Dwelling Unit and Garage only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 17.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 18.) Baldwin Road is classified as a local access road. Disney Road is a private road and both require a minimum 20-foot lot line setback. The eastern lot line is adjacent to the shoreline and additional development will be reviewed by the Shoreline Master Program to determine setbacks. The remaining lot line to the south requires a minimum 5-foot setback. 19.) Maximum lot coverage is not to exceed 25%. Lot coverage is calculated by the amount of impervious surface which inlcudes roof tops, driveways, concrete, etc. PRJ03-00059 MLA03-00147 BALDWIN P Application Received: 3/25/2003 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: ADU W/ATTACHED GARAGE No findings, conditions, or permissions found. RAP03-00075 MLA03-00147 BALDWIN I F K RUSSELL Application Received: 3/24/2003 Permit Issued/Case closed: 4/30/2003 Case Finaled: 1/14/2005 ROAD APPROACH & 911 - BALDWIN RD 1.) The applicant may install a private road approach to Baldwin Rd. at mile post.09 left. 2.) An approach culvert is not necessary at this location at this time; however, if drainage becomes a problem here in the future the county reserves the right to require one. 3.) The applicant must place a minimum of 2 inches of crushed surfacing to the right- of-way line. 4.) The grade of the approach shall be such that all surface water shall be directed into a ditch line and not onto the county road. BLD03-00346 MLA03-00311 BALDWIN I F K RUSSELL Application Received: 6/4/2003 Permit Issued/Case closed: 6/10/2003 Case Finaled: 10/22/2003 CARPORT (Port Cochere 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on 6/9/03 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Wetlands, Eagle Habitat, High Risk/At Risk Seawater Intrusion Protection Zone (SIPZ). 2.) The project components are more than 250' from the mapped/identified wetland. The requirement for a wetland delineation and report is waived based on maintenance of a 225' buffer from the wetland per UDC Table 3-3. 3 of 4 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner 3.) • Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals(primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 4.) The parcel is located within an At Risk SIPZ(seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Policy (Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002)that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. An At Risk SIPZ is defined as: areas within 1,000 feet of a groundwater source with a history of chloride analyses between 100 mg/L and 200 mg/L (milligrams per liter). 5.) The proposed carport will not be connected to potable water and therefore SIPZ conditions do not apply. 6.) The proposal was reviewed for eagle habitat and shall adhere to the approved eagle management plan approved by WDFW. 7.) The applicant is not creating any new or additional impervious surface. Best Management Practices shall be utilized during the construction phase. 8.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 9.) The site plan as submitted with the building application on 6/04/03 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated 6/09/03 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 10.) This approval is for a carport only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 11.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 12.) Maximum lot coverage is not to exceed 25%. Lot coverage is defined by the amount of impervious surface which includes roof tops, driveways, concrete, etc. 13.) Baldwin Road is classified as a local access road. Disney Road is a private road and both require a minimum 20-foot lot line setback. The eastern lot line is adjacent to the shoreline and will require review under the Shoreline Master Program to determine setbacks. The remaining lot line requires a minimum 5-foot setback. ZON12-00002 MLA12-00006 MAUNEY TRUSTEE I F Application Received: 1/4/2012 Permit Issued/Case closed: 1/31/2012 Case Finaled: 1/31/2012 CODE INTERPRETA I ION - Marrowstone Island Subdivision Moratorium and Public Water The code interpretation is not parcel specific. No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRE12-00004 MAUNEY TRUSTEE P Application Received: 2/23/2012 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: PRE APPLICATION FDlt SHOR I PLAT No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SOM03-00063 BENNETT F Application Received: 10/15/2003 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: No findings, conditions, or permissions found. 4 of 4 ' Parcel Print Page 1 of 1 Parcel Number 921094026 06/24/2011 Owner Mailing Address: MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE LYNNE ROGERSON TRUSTEE MAUNEY/ROGERSON REV LIV T 2133 OAK BAY RD PORT HADLOCK WA 983399778 Site Address: 91 BALDWIN RD NORDLAND 98358 Section: 9 School District: Chimacum(49) Qtr Section: SE1/4 Fire Dist: Chimacum(1) Township: 29N Tax Status: Taxable Range: 1E Tax Code: 211 Planning area: Manrowstone(3) Sub Division: Land Use Code: 1100 - HOUSES (single units, non-farm) Property Description: S9 T29 R1E I LOT 1 SUB) TO EASE http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL NO=921094026... 2/27/2012 1 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 3 of 42 Article I. General Provisions 18.35.010 General authority. This chapter of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code is adopted under the authority of Chapter 58.17 RCW. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.020 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to regulate the division of land lying within Jefferson County, and to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare in accordance with the standards established by the state of Washington and Jefferson County, and to: (1) Prevent the overcrowding of land; (2) Lessen congestion and promote safe and convenient travel by the public on sidewalks, pathways, streets and highways; (3) Promote the efficient use of land; (4) Facilitate adequate provision for water supply, sewage disposal, drainage, streets, schools, parks, recreational areas, fire protection and other capital requirements; (5) Require uniform monumentation and conveyancing of lots, tracts and parcels by accurate legal description; (6) Facilitate the expeditious processing of development applications through the adoption of clear, predictable and uniformly applied land division regulations; and (7) Implement the goals, policies and substantive requirements of the Washington State Growth Management Act (Chapter 36.70A RCW) and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.030 Applicability. (1) This chapter applies to the division of land into four parcels for short subdivisions and of five or more parcels for long subdivisions. This chapter further applies to boundary line adjustments and binding site plan review and regulation. (2) Property boundary lines separating two or more lots of record may be adjusted only under the specific provisions set forth in this chapter. (3) The process for resubdivision, alteration and vacation of any existing subdivision is identical to the process for initial subdivision. All such subdivision applications shall conform with the applicable sections in this chapter governing the subdivision of property into lots, tracts or parcels. All proposed plat vacations shall comply with the requirements and criteria set forth in RCW 58.17.212, as now adopted or hereafter amended. (4) Where this chapter imposes greater restrictions or higher standards upon the development of land than other provisions of this code, laws, ordinances or restrictive covenants, the provisions of this chapter shall prevail. (5) Pursuant to Chapters 79.125 and 58.17 RCW, tidelands may not be altered in any fashion under this section. Tideland acreage may not be included or given other http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 4 of 42 consideration in any land division, plat alteration, or boundary line adjustment. The authority to alter platted tidelands lies with the department of natural resources. [Ord. 8- 06 § 1] 18.35.040 Exemptions. This chapter does not apply to the following: (1) Divisions of land into lots, tracts or parcels each one of which is one-sixteenth of a section of land or larger, or 40 acres or larger if the land is not capable of description as a fraction of a section of land; provided, that for purposes of computing the size of a lot that borders on a street or road, the lot size shall be expanded to include that area that would be bounded by the center line of the street or road and the side lot lines of the lot running perpendicular to such center line; and provided further, that within the commercial forest district (i.e., CF-80), each lot, tract or parcel shall be at least 80 acres in size; (2) Cemeteries and burial plots while used for that purpose; (3) Divisions of land made by testamentary provisions or the laws of descent; provided, that this exemption shall not be construed to permit inter vivos transfers, and provided further, that any structure or use on the property must comply with all other applicable county regulations; and (4) Divisions of land relating to the acquisition of a fee simple interest in land by public agencies, including, but not limited to, divisions made for road or public right-of-way conveyance or widening purposes. This exemption shall not be construed to include acquisitions of easements. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.050 Violations — Penalties. (1) Criminal Penalties and Liability. Any person, firm, corporation, or association or any agent of any person, firm, corporation or association who sells, offers for sale, leases, or transfers any lot, tract, or parcel of land prior to compliance with this chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $1,000 or by imprisonment in jail for a term not exceeding 90 days, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each violation or each sale, offer for sale, lease, or transfer of each separate lot, tract, or parcel of land in violation of any provision of this chapter is deemed a separate and distinct offense. If performance of an offer of agreement to sell. lease or otherwise transfer a lot, tract or parcel of land following preliminary approval of a short plat or long plat, but prior to final plat approval, is expressly conditioned on the recording of the final plat containing the lot, tract or parcel under this chapter, the offer or agreement does not violate any provision of this chapter. All payments on account of an offer or agreement conditioned as provided in this chapter shall be deposited in an escrow account and no disbursements to sellers are permitted until the final plat is recorded. This prohibition of property transfers prior to compliance with this chapter shall apply equally to transfers prior to completion of short subdivisions, long subdivisions and binding site plans. (2) Chapter 18.50 JCC Applicable. In addition to the penalties provided in this section, all violations of any provision of this chapter or any incorporated standards, or conditions of any permit issued hereunder, are subject to the provisions of Chapter 18.50 JCC. The http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 5 of 42 administrator is authorized to enforce the provisions of this chapter in accordance with Chapter 18.50 JCC. (3) Other Enforcement Action. In the event an applicant for a short subdivision, long subdivision, or binding site plan fails and refuses to install required improvements in the time required by any preliminary or final approval, the county may withhold further building or other development permits, make demand against any bonds, collect monies deposited in escrow to secure installation of improvements, initiate a local improvement district, or take such other action as may be necessary to cause the improvements to be made. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] Article II. Boundary Line Adjustments 18.35.060 Purpose, scope and limitations. (1) Purpose and Scope. The purpose of this article is to provide procedures and criteria for the review and approval of adjustments to boundary lines between platted or unplatted lots, tracts or parcels, or both in order to: (a) Allow the enlargement or merging of lots, tracts or parcels to improve or qualify as a buildable lot or for any other lawful purpose; (b) Rectify defects in legal descriptions; (c) Achieve increased setbacks from property lines or environmentally sensitive areas; (d) Correct situations wherein an established use is located across a lot line; or (e) For other similar purposes. This article is also intended to ensure compliance with the Survey Recording Act, Chapter 58.09 RCW and Chapter 332-130 WAC. (2) Prohibited Boundary Changes. This article shall not apply to boundary changes that would: (a) Result in the creation of an additional lot, tract, parcel, site within a binding site plan or division as defined in Chapter 18.10 JCC; (b) Result in a lot, tract or parcel or site within a binding site plan that does not qualify as a buildable lot as defined in Chapter 18.10 JCC; (c) Relocate an entire lot, tract or parcel from one parent parcel into another parent parcel; (d) An adjustment that crosses zoning district boundaries. Adjustments may be allowed across different rural residential densities; (e) Be inconsistent with any restrictions or conditions of approval for a recorded short plat or long plat; or circumvent the short subdivision or long subdivision procedures set forth in this chapter; http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 6 of 42 (f) Separate an accessory dwelling unit from the primary use of the property. (3) Lot Consolidation. The consolidation of two or more lots, tracts or parcels for the purpose of creating a single lot, tract or parcel that meets the requirements for a buildable lot shall in all cases be considered a minor adjustment of boundary lines and shall not be subject to the short subdivision or long subdivision provisions of this chapter. Lot consolidations shall not require a survey or soil evaluation. (4) Adjustments to Binding Site Plans. Recognized lots in an approved binding site plan shall be considered a single site and no lot lines on the site may be altered by a boundary line adjustment to separate lots to another property not included in the original site plan of the subject development. (5) Rectifying legal defects, such as an established use located across a lot line, and the adjustment of boundary lines to match water bodies, roads, or fence lines, shall be considered minor adjustments and shall not require a soil evaluation and may be allowed regardless of the size of the resultant parcels. (6) Time Limitations. If more than two lots, tracts or parcels have been subject to a boundary line adjustment process, those lots shall not be permitted to use the boundary line adjustment process again for five years with the exception of lot consolidations, testamentary divisions, civil cases, court orders, rectifying legal defects, or the adjustment of one line between two or more property owners for the purpose of settling a dispute. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.070 Application submittal and contents. To be considered complete, applications for boundary line adjustments shall include the following: (1) Applications for boundary line adjustments shall be made on forms provided by the Jefferson County department of community development and shall be submitted to the department of community development, along with the appropriate fees established under the Jefferson County fee ordinance. (a) A single application may be submitted for multiple BLAs for adjacent parcels, lots, tracts or sites within a binding site plan. However, standard application fee(s) shall apply to each BLA after the first two per additional parcel, lot, tract or site. (b) In instances of lot consolidation, standard application fee(s) shall apply based on the number of resulting parcels or lots; (2) A completed land use permit application form, including all materials required pursuant to Chapter 18.40 JCC; (3) Three copies of a clean and legible drawing suitable for recording showing the following: (a) The proposed lines for all affected lots, tracts or parcels, indicated by bold solid lines; http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 7 of 42 (b) The existing lot, tract or parcel lines proposed to be changed, indicated by light broken lines; (c) The location and dimensions of all structures/improvements existing upon the affected lots, tracts or parcels and the distance between each such structure/improvement and the proposed boundary lines, with structures proposed to be removed from the site depicted with broken lines and structures to remain on the site depicted with solid lines; (d) A north arrow indication and scale; (e) All assessor's tax parcel numbers for the affected lots, tracts or parcels; (f) The location of the property as to quarter/quarter section; (g) The location and dimensions of any easements within or adjacent to any affected lots, tracts or parcels; (h) The location, right-of-way widths, pavement widths and names of all existing or platted streets or roads, whether public or private, and other public ways within or adjacent to the affected lots, tracts or parcels; (i) The area and dimensions of each lot prior to and following the proposed adjustment; (j) The existing on-site sewage system components and reserve areas and the proposed location for on-site sewage systems and soil test pits for all affected lots that are not currently served by an on-site sewage system or other approved wastewater treatment system; (k) The location of all existing and proposed water and storm drainage facilities; and (I) The approximate location and extent of any environmentally sensitive areas designated under Article VI-D of Chapter 18.15 JCC, including any flood hazard areas lying within the existing or revised parcel boundaries. The following notice will be recorded on the drawing when the parcels that are part of the boundary line adjustment include, or are adjacent to, environmentally sensitive areas (ESA): Notice to Public: Current Jefferson County geographic information systems (GIS) maps identify the presence of an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) such as stream, wetland, flood, landslide hazard, erosion, aquifer recharge area, fish and wildlife habitat, shoreline, etc., lying within and/or adjacent to the revised parcels encompassed by this Boundary Line Adjustment. Prior to any land disturbing activity or construction activity, applicant/owner shall contact the Jefferson County department of community development regarding compliance for such ESAs. Approval of this Boundary Line Adjustment does not guarantee a buildable site within said parcel(s). Such determination is dependent on approvals of water, septic, bulk and dimensional setbacks, and ESA requirements. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/J effersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 8 of 42 (4) The original legal description of the entire property together with new separate legal descriptions for each lot, tract or parcel, labeling them each as existing parcel A, existing parcel B, revised parcel A, revised parcel B, etc. The drawing shall be attached to or include on the face a formal legal declaration of the boundary line adjustment, signed and notarized by all legal owners of the subject properties. In cases where the property has not been surveyed, the following disclaimer shall be recorded on the drawing: DISCLAIMER LANGUAGE FOR BLA STATEMENT OF INTENT: Your request for a Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) has been approved. Since no survey was submitted as part of your BLA application, the County accepts no liability for what facts a survey might have revealed. A survey might have revealed that a structure or improvement believed to be on the applicant's property is, in fact, located wholly or partially upon someone else's property or upon property that is not the subject of this BLA. But in the absence of a survey, the applicant bears sole responsibility if such a problem arises. (5) A copy of any covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs), deed restrictions, or planned rural residential development (PRRD) agreements pertaining to or affecting the property; and (6) If an individual septic system is proposed (i.e., as opposed to connection to either a community drainfield or municipal sewer system), the applicant shall provide written verification from the Jefferson County department of environmental health that the lots, tracts, parcels or sites, as each would exist after the boundary line adjustment, are adequate to accommodate an on-site sewage disposal system. The location of soil logs must be shown on the drawing to show land area sufficient to meet environmental health requirements for each resultant lot, tract, or parcel that does not contain a dwelling. An applicant may choose to apply for a site plan approval advance determination (SPAAD) to fulfill this requirement. In cases where the requirement to provide written verification that the resultant lots can accommodate on-site sewage system from the Jefferson County department of environmental health has been waived, the following notice shall be recorded on the drawing: Notice to Public: Approval of this Boundary Line Adjustment does not guarantee a buildable site within said parcel(s). Such determination is dependent on approvals of water, septic, bulk and dimensional setbacks, and ESA requirements. This requirement shall be waived for resultant parcels that: (a) Are larger than 2.5 acres; (b) Have existing residential structures; or (c) Have limited the use of the resultant parcel to agriculture, forestry, or open space through conservation easements, restrictive covenant, or similar legal arrangement. The open space tax program shall not be used to fulfill this requirement; http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 9 of 42 (7) The application shall be accompanied by a current (i.e., within 30 days) title company certification of the following: (a) The legal description of the total parcels sought to be adjusted; (b) Those individuals or corporations holding an ownership interest and any security interest (such as deeds or trust or mortgages) or any other encumbrances affecting the title of said parcels. Such individuals or corporations shall sign and approve the final survey prior to final approval; (c) Any lands to be dedicated shall be confirmed as being owned in fee title by the owner(s) signing the dedication certificate; (d) Any easements or restrictions affecting the properties to be adjusted with a description of purpose and referenced by the auditor's file number and/or recording number; and (e) If lands are to be dedicated or conveyed to the county as part of the subdivision, an American Land Title Association (A.L.T.A.) policy may be required by the director of the department of public works. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.080 Review process and criteria. (1) Prior to approval, a proposed boundary line adjustment shall be reviewed by the Jefferson County assessor. (2) Based on any comments solicited and received from the department of public works, the department of environmental health or other applicable departments and agencies, the administrator shall approve the proposed boundary line adjustment only upon finding that the adjustment would not: (a) Create any additional lot, tract, parcel, site within a binding site plan or division or relocate any lot, tract, parcel, or site within a binding site plan or division to another parent parcel; (b) Result in a lot, tract, parcel, site within a binding site plan or division that contains increased density or insufficient area or dimension to meet the minimum requirements for area and dimension as set forth in Chapter 18.15 JCC and state and local health codes and regulations; (c) Diminish or impair drainage, water supply, existing sewage disposal, and access or easement for vehicles or pedestrians, utilities.. and fire protection for any lot, tract, parcel, site (i.e., within an approved binding site plan), or division; (d) Diminish or impair any public or private utility easement or deprive any parcel of access or utilities; (e) Diminish or impair the functions and values of environmentally sensitive areas designated under Article VI-D of Chapter 18.15 JCC, or create an unsafe or hazardous environmental condition; http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 10 of 42 (f) Create unreasonably restrictive or hazardous access to the property; (g) Create a nonconforming lot, tract, or parcel or increase the nonconforming aspects of an existing lot, tract or parcel relative to Chapter 18.15 JCC; (h) Replat or vacate a short plat or long plat, or revise, amend, or violate any of the conditions of approval for any short or long subdivision; or (i) Create a lot, tract, or parcel that crosses zoning district boundaries, with the exception an adjustment across rural residential densities. (3) Following approval by the administrator, a final record of survey document shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor in accordance with Chapter 58.09 RCW and Chapter 332-130 WAC. The document shall contain a land surveyor's certificate and a recording certificate. The final page of the record of survey document shall contain the following signature blocks: (a) The Jefferson County assessor's office, to be signed by the Jefferson County assessor or his/her designee; and (b) The department of community development, to be signed by the administrator. (4) Upon approval the following statement of intent shall be recorded by the auditor and referenced by auditor file number on the final survey: THIS RECORDING IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING WITH A BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PURSUANT TO RCW 58.17.040(6). IT DOES NOT CREATE ANY ADDITIONAL LOTS, TRACTS, PARCELS, OR A DIVISION AS THE LAND DESCRIBED HEREON SHALL MERGE OR BE INTEGRATED INTO ABUTTING PROPERTY PRESENTLY OWNED BY THE PROPONENTS. NOR DOES THE BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT RESULT IN ANY LOTS, TRACTS, PARCELS OR DIVISION WHICH CONTAIN INSUFFICIENT AREA AND DIMENSION TO MEET MINIMUM COUNTY AND SANITATION REQUIREMENTS FOR WIDTH AND AREA FOR A BUILDING SITE. (5) Pursuant to RCW 86.56.345, current year and any delinquent taxes shall be paid before approval of any boundary line adjustment. (6) Applications for boundary line adjustments shall be processed according to the procedures for Type I land use decisions established in Chapter 18.40 JCC. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] Article Ill. Short Subdivisions 18.35.090 Scope. Any land being divided into four or fewer lots, tracts or parcels that has not been divided through a short subdivision within the previous five years shall meet the requirements of this article. Land within an approved short subdivision may not be further divided in any manner within a period of five years without the filing of a long plat. However, when a http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 11 of 42 short plat contains fewer than four parcels, the owner of the short plat may file an alteration within the five-year period to create up to four lots within the boundaries of the original short plat; provided, that the parcel is not held in common ownership with a contiguous parcel which has been subdivided within the preceding five years. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.100 Application submittal and contents. To be considered complete, applications for short subdivisions shall include the following information: (1) Applications for short subdivisions shall be made on forms provided by the Jefferson County department of community development and shall be submitted to the department of community development, along with the appropriate fees established under the Jefferson County fee ordinance; (2) A completed land use permit application form, including all materials required pursuant to Chapter 18.40 JCC; (3) A sworn certification by the applicant verifying whether the applicant has any interest in any land adjacent to any portion of the subject property; such interest in land may be by reason of ownership, contract for purchase by an agreement or option by any person, family member, firm or corporation in any manner connected with the applicant or the development; (4) The dimensions and area of each proposed lot, tract or parcel to accurately show that each lot, tract or parcel contains sufficient area to satisfy the minimum requirements of Chapter 18.15 JCC; provided, that the area of land contained in access easements, access panhandles or pipestem configurations shall not be included in the area computations; (5) Five paper copies of a preliminary short plat meeting the standards of JCC 18.35.110 and 18.35.120; (6) Where applicable, any special reports or studies required under Chapter 18.15 JCC, prepared in accordance with the requirements of Article VI-K of Chapter 18.15 JCC; (7) A preliminary drainage plan prepared in a manner consistent with the requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC, including any soil test information that may be deemed necessary by the director of the department of public works; (8) The estimated quantities of any fill to be expected from the site and imported to the site; and (9) Documentation of water availability and adequacy for each parcel affected sufficient to meet the requirements of JCC 18.30.030. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.110 Preliminary short plat preparation. The preliminary short plat shall be prepared in accordance with the following requirements: http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 12 of 42 (1) The preliminary short plat shall be prepared by a Washington State licensed engineer or land surveyor registered or licensed by the state of Washington. The preparer shall certify on the short plat that it is a true and correct representation of the land actually surveyed. The preparation of the plat shall comply with the Survey Recording Act, Chapter 58.09 RCW and Chapter 332-130 WAC as now adopted or hereafter amended. Upon surveying the property, the surveyor shall place temporary stakes on the property to enable the county to locate and assess features of the short plat in the field. The datum to be used for all surveying and mapping shall be as follows: The projection name is the state plane; the projection spheroid is GRS 1980; the coordinate system is Washington State Plane North Zone; and the horizontal datum is NAD 83. (2) All geographic information portrayed by the preliminary short plat shall be accurate, legible and drawn to a horizontal scale of 50 feet or fewer to the inch, except that the location sketch and typical roadway cross-sections may be drawn to any other appropriate scale. (3) A preliminary short plat shall be 18 by 24 inches in size, allowing one-half inch borders, and if more than one sheet is needed, each sheet shall be numbered consecutively and an index sheet showing the entire property and orienting the other sheets, at any appropriate scale, shall be provided. In addition to other map submittals, the applicant shall submit one copy of each sheet reduced to 8-1/2 inches by 11-1/2 inches in size. If more than one sheet is required, an index sheet showing the entire subdivision with road and highway names and block numbers (if any) shall be provided. Each sheet, including the index sheet, shall be of the above specified size. (4) The area of each proposed lot, tract or parcel on the short plat map shall accurately show that each lot, tract or parcel contains sufficient area to satisfy minimum zoning requirements. The area of land contained in access easements, access panhandles or pipestem configurations shall not be included in the area computations. [Ord. 8-06 § 11 18.35.120 Preliminary short plat contents. (1) A preliminary short plat shall be submitted on one or more sheets and shall provide the information described below. All specifications for required improvements shall conform to the development standards contained in Chapter 18.30 JCC. (a) The name of the proposed subdivisions together with the words "Preliminary Short Plat"; (b) The name and address of the applicant; (c) The name, address, stamp and signature of the professional engineer or professional land surveyor who prepared the preliminary plat; (d) Numeric scale (50 feet or fewer to the inch), graphic scale, true north point, and date of preparation; (e) Identification of all land intended to be cleared, and the location of the proposed access to the site for clearing and grading during site development or construction; and http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 13 of 42 (f) A form for the endorsement of the administrator, as follows: APPROVED BY JEFFERSON COUNTY Department of Community Date Development Administrator (2) The preliminary plat shall contain a vicinity sketch sufficient to define the location and boundaries of the proposed subdivision with respect to surrounding property, roads, and other major constructed and natural features. (3) Except as otherwise specified in this chapter, the preliminary short plat shall contain the following existing geographic features, drawn lightly in relation to proposed geographic features: (a) The boundaries of the property to be subdivided, and the boundaries of any adjacent property under the same ownership as the land to be subdivided, to be indicated by bold lines; (b) The names of all adjoining property owners, or names of adjoining developers; (c) All existing property lines lying within the proposed subdivision, including lot lines for lots of record which are to be vacated, and all existing property lines for any property adjacent to the subject property which is under the same ownership as the property to be subdivided (as described in JCC 18.35.110(3)) shall be shown in broken lines; (d) The location, right-of-way widths, pavement widths and names of all existing or platted roads, whether public or private, and other public ways within 200 feet of the property to be divided; (e) The location, widths and purposes of any existing easements lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision; (f) The location, size and invert elevation of sanitary sewer lines and stormwater management facilities lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision or those that will be connected to the subdivision as part of the proposal (if applicable); (g) The location and size of existing water system facilities including all fire hydrants lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision or those which will be connected to as part of the proposed subdivision (if applicable); (h) The location, size and description of any other underground and overhead facilities lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision (if applicable); (i) The location of any environmentally sensitive areas as described in Article VI-D of Chapter 18.15 JCC, including all floodplains lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision; http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 14 of 42 (j) The location of existing sections and municipal corporation boundary lines lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision; (k) The location of any well and associated setbacks existing within the proposed subdivision; (I) The location of any individual or on-site sewage disposal system existing within the proposed subdivision; (m) Existing contour lines at intervals of five feet, labeled at intervals not to exceed 20 feet; (n) The location of any existing structures lying within the proposed subdivision; existing structures to be removed shall be indicated by broken lines, and existing structures not to be removed shall be indicated by solid lines. (4) The preliminary plat shall show the following proposed geographic features: (a) The boundaries in bold solid lines of any proposed lots, tracts or parcels, the area and dimensions of each proposed lot, tract or parcel, and the proposed identifying number or letter to be assigned to each lot, tract or parcel, and block (if applicable); (b) The right-of-way location and width, the proposed name of each road, street or other public way to be created and the estimated tentative grades of such roads; where roadways may exceed the maximum allowable grade or alignment, the director of the department of public works may require sufficient data, including centerline profiles and cross-sections, if necessary, to determine the feasibility of said roadway; (c) The location, width and purpose of each easement to be created; (d) The boundaries, dimensions and area of public and common park and open space areas; (e) Identification of all areas proposed to be dedicated for public use, together with the purpose and any condition of dedication; (f) Proposed final contour lines at intervals of five feet; final contour lines shall be indicated by solid lines; contour lines shall be labeled in intervals not to exceed 20 feet; (g) The building envelope, as defined in JCC 18.10.020, shall be indicated for each lot; (h) Proposed monumentation; (i) Proposed location and description of all individual or community wells, or water system improvements, including fire hydrants (if applicable); http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 15 of 42 (j) Proposed location and description of all sewage disposal improvements, including (if applicable) profiles and all pump stations and their connections to the existing system; (k) Proposed location and description of all stormwater management improvements; (I) Proposed road cross-sections, showing bicycle and pedestrian pathways, trails and sidewalks (if applicable); (m) Proposed type and location of road lighting (if applicable); (n) Proposed type and location of landscaping (if applicable); (o) Proposed location and description of transit stops and shelters (if applicable); (p) Proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs) on development (if applicable). (5) Upon review of an application, the administrator may require additional pertinent information, as deemed necessary, to satisfy any other regulatory requirements. The administrator may also waive specific submittal requirements determined to be unnecessary for review of an application. In such event, the administrator shall document the waiver in the project file or log. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.130 Short plat approval criteria. In addition to the review criteria provided in Chapter 18.40 JCC, the following criteria are the minimum measures by which each proposed short subdivision will be considered: (1) Short subdivisions shall be given preliminary approval, including preliminary approval subject to conditions, upon finding by the administrator that all of the following have been satisfied: (a) The proposed subdivision conforms to all applicable county, state and federal zoning, land use, environmental and health regulations and plans, including but not limited to the following: (i) The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan; and (ii) The provisions of this code, including any incorporated standards; (b) Utilities and other public services necessary to serve the needs of the proposed subdivision shall be made available, including open spaces, drainage ways, roads, streets and other public ways, potable water, transit facilities, sewage disposal, parks, playgrounds, schools, sidewalks and other improvements to assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school; (c) Approving the proposed short subdivision will serve the public use and interest and adequate provision has been made for the public health, safety and general welfare. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 16 of 42 (2) Notwithstanding the approval criteria set forth in subsection (1) of this section, in accordance with RCW 58.17.120, as now adopted and hereafter amended, a proposed subdivision may be denied because of flood, inundation or swamp conditions. Where any portion of the proposed short subdivision lies within both a flood control zone, as specified by Chapter 86.16 RCW, and either the 100-year floodplain or the regulatory floodway, the county shall not approve the preliminary short plat unless: (a) The applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the administrator that no feasible alternative exists to locating lots and building envelopes within the 100-year floodplain; and (b) It imposes a condition requiring the applicant to comply with Article VI-F of Chapter 18.15 JCC and any written recommendations of the Washington State Department of Ecology. In such cases, the county shall issue no development permit associated with the proposed short subdivision until flood control problems have been resolved. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.140 Short plat review process. (1) An application for a short subdivision shall be processed according to the procedures for Type II land use decisions established in Chapter 18.40 JCC. (2) The administrator shall solicit comments from the director of the department of public works, the chief of the fire district in which the proposal is located, local utility providers, sheriff, building official, school district in which the proposal is located, adjacent jurisdictions if the proposal is within one mile of a city or other jurisdiction, Washington State Department of Transportation if the proposal is adjacent to a state highway, and any other local, state or federal officials as may be necessary. (3) Based on comments from county departments, applicable agencies and other information, the administrator shall review the proposal subject to the criteria contained in JCC 18.35.130. A proposed short plat shall only be approved when consistent with all the provisions of JCC 18.35.130. (4) An applicant for a short subdivision may request that certain requirements established or referenced by this chapter be modified. Such requests shall be processed according to the procedures for variances in Chapter 18.40 JCC, and shall satisfy the criteria contained in Article IV of Chapter 18.40 JCC, Variances. (5) Pursuant to RCW 86.56.345, current year and any delinquent taxes must be paid before the approval of a short subdivision. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.150 Modifications to an approved preliminary short plat. (1) Minor modifications to a previously approved preliminary short plat may be requested by the applicant and approved by the administrator subject to the provisions for Type I decisions in Chapter 18.40 JCC; provided, that the modification does not involve any of the following: (a) The location or relocation of a road or street; (b) The creation of an additional lot, tract or parcel; http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 17 of 42 (c) The creation of a lot, tract or parcel that does not qualify as a buildable lot pursuant to this code; (d) The relocation of an entire lot, tract or parcel from one parent parcel into another parent parcel. (2) Before approving such an amendment, the administrator shall make written findings and conclusions documenting the following conditions: (a) The modification will not be inconsistent or cause the short subdivision to be inconsistent with the decision of the county preliminarily approving the application; (b) The modification will not violate the intent of the original conditions of application approval; and (c) The modification will not cause the short subdivision to violate any applicable county policy or regulation. (3) Modifications that involve the circumstances described in subsection (1) of this section, or exceed the criteria set forth in subsection (2) of this section, shall be processed as a new preliminary short plat application. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.160 Surety. Subdivision applicants may be required to post a surety guaranteeing completion of subdivision improvements within one year of final plat approval. The surety shall be for 200 percent of the cost of construction of those improvements estimated by a licensed engineer. Surety shall be in a form acceptable to Jefferson County. In the event that the applicant does not complete construction within one year, Jefferson County shall be authorized to complete the construction and pay for the work from the surety account. Surety shall not be accepted for developing potable water sources. Surety may only be released only after inspection by Jefferson County. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.170 Director of the department of public works certificate of improvements. No permit for the construction of improvements within an approved subdivision shall be issued by the county until the improvement method report, all construction drawings, proposed performance guarantees, and other submittals in conformance with the development standards contained in Chapter 18.30 JCC and any incorporated standards have been received and approved by the director of the department of public works. All construction of improvements shall be inspected and approved in conformance with the development standards contained in Chapter 18.30 JCC and any incorporated standards. After completion of all required improvements or the guarantee of the construction of all required improvements, the director of the department of public works shall submit a certificate in triplicate to the administrator stating the required improvements or guarantees are in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, the preliminary short plat, including the county's decision approving the short plat, and in accordance with the development standards contained in Chapter 18.30 JCC and any incorporated standards. The administrator shall transmit one copy of the certification to the subdivider, together with a notice advising the subdivider to prepare a final plat for the proposed short subdivision. The administrator shall retain one copy of the certificate. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 18 of 42 18.35.180 Final short plat requirements. The applicant must submit a reproducible copy, plus five paper copies of the proposed final short plat to the administrator. The reproducible copy of the approved final short plat will contain the elements as described in JCC 18.35.120 and shall include certifications and other requirements as provided in JCC 18.35.370 for long plats. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.190 Accompanying documents — Final short plat. (1) In cases where any restrictive deed covenants or CC&Rs will apply to lots or parcels within a subdivision, a type written copy of such covenants, bearing all necessary signatures, shall be submitted along with the final plat. Where the recordation of specific deed restrictions or CC&R provisions have been required as a condition of preliminary plat approval, the administrator shall approve and sign the deed restriction or CC&Rs prior to final plat approval. (2) The final plat shall be accompanied by a current (i.e., within 30 days) title company certification of the following: (a) The legal description of the total parcel sought to be subdivided; (b) Those individuals or corporations holding an ownership interest and any security interest (such as deeds or trust or mortgages) or any other encumbrances affecting the title of said parcel. Such individuals or corporations shall sign and approve the final plat prior to final approval; (c) Any lands to be dedicated shall be confirmed as being owned in fee title by the owner(s) signing the dedication certificate; (d) Any easements or restrictions affecting the property to be subdivided with a description of purpose and referenced by the auditor's file number and/or recording number; and (e) If lands are to be dedicated or conveyed to the county as part of the subdivision, an American Land Title Association (A.L.T.A.) policy may be required by the director of the department of public works. (3) All maintenance, performance and guarantee bonds or other guarantees as may be required by the director of the department of public works and the approved improvement method report to guarantee the acceptability and/or performance of all required improvements. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.200 Final short plat approval. The final short plat shall be approved by the administrator upon satisfaction of all conditions of approval and all requirements as provided in this article and Article VI of this chapter. Final approval of short plats by the Jefferson County board of county commissioners shall be required. All final short plats shall be approved, disapproved or returned to the applicant within 30 days of their filing, unless the applicant consents to an extension of time in writing. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.210 Time limitation on final short plat submittal. http://www.codepubl ishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 19 of 42 Approval of a preliminary short plat shall expire unless the applicant submits a proposed final plat in proper form for final approval within three years after preliminary approval. The department of community development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of an impending expiration. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.220 Effect of an approved final short plat—Valid land use. Any lots, tracts or parcels in a final short plat filed for record shall be a valid land use notwithstanding any change in zoning for a period of five years from the date of filing. A short subdivision shall be governed by the terms of approval of the final short plat, and the statutes, ordinances and regulations in effect on the date of preliminary plat approval for a period of five years after final short plat approval unless the Jefferson County board of commissioners finds that a change in conditions creates a serious threat to the public health or safety of residents within or outside the short subdivision. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.230 Distribution of copies and filing of final short plat. and copies of the approved final short plat The administrator shall distribute the original a pp p p as follows: (1) The original shall be returned to the applicant after it has been forwarded to the county auditor for recording; and (2) One recorded paper copy shall be retained in the files of the department of community development. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.240 Transfer of ownership following short plat approval. Whenever any parcel of land lying within the county is divided under the provisions of this article relating to short subdivisions, no person, firm, or corporation shall sell or transfer any such lot, tract or parcel without having first received final approval of the short plat and having recorded the final short plat with the Jefferson County auditor. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that a final short plat is fully certified and filed for record with the Jefferson County auditor prior to transferring ownership of any land. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.250 Building and occupancy permits — Issuance after final short plat approval. (1) No building permit for a structure other than a temporary contractor's office or temporary storage building shall be issued for a lot or parcel within an approved short subdivision prior to a determination by the relevant fire district chief or designee that adequate fire protection and access for construction needs exists. (2) No building permit for a structure other than a temporary contractor's office or temporary storage building shall be issued for a lot or parcel within an approved short subdivision until the applicant complies with the improvement method report, all requirements of the department of public works certificate of improvements, and all requirements of the final plat approval. (3) No occupancy permit for a structure other than a temporary contractor's office or other approved temporary building shall be issued for a structure on a lot or parcel within an approved subdivision prior to final inspection and approval of all required improvements http://www.codepubl i shing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 20 of 42 which will serve such lot or parcel to the satisfaction of the director of the department of public works and county building official. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.260 Accumulative short plats. Accumulative short plats are not permitted. The short subdivision process may not be used to apply for a series of short plats within two years from any application, thereby circumventing the long subdivision procedures. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] Article IV. Long Subdivisions 18.35.270 Scope. Long subdivisions, as processed under this article, shall include all divisions of land into five or more lots, and shall require improvements so that any development will be in compliance with this code and any other codes or ordinances which may apply. [Ord. 8- 06 § 1] 18.35.280 Application submittal and contents. To be considered complete, the application for a long subdivision shall include the following information: (1) The application for approval of a long subdivision shall be submitted to the department of community development on forms to be provided by the department along with the appropriate fees established by the Jefferson County fee ordinance; (2) A completed land use permit application form, including all materials required pursuant to Chapter 18.40 JCC; (3) The area and dimensions of each proposed lot, tract or parcel to accurately show that each lot, tract or parcel contains sufficient area to satisfy the minimum requirements of Chapter 18.15 JCC. The area of land contained in access easements, access panhandles or pipestem configurations shall not be included in the area computations; (4) Five paper copies of a preliminary plat meeting the standards and requirements of JCC 18.35.290 and 18.35.300; (5) Where applicable, any special reports or studies required under Chapter 18.15 JCC, prepared in accordance with the requirements of Article VI-K of Chapter 18.15 JCC; (6) A preliminary drainage plan prepared in a manner consistent with the requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC, including any soil test information as may be deemed necessary by the director of the department of public works; (7) The estimated quantities of any fill to be exported from the site and imported to the site; and (8) Documentation of water availability and adequacy for each parcel affected sufficient to meet the requirements of JCC 18.30.030. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.290 Preliminary plat— Preparation. The preliminary plat shall be prepared in accordance with the following requirements: http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 21 of 42 (1) The preliminary plat shall be prepared by a Washington State licensed engineer or land surveyor registered or licensed by the state of Washington. The preparer shall certify on the plat that it is a true and correct representation of the lands actually surveyed. The preparation of the plat shall comply with the Survey Recording Act, Chapter 58.09 RCW and Chapter 332-130 WAC as now adopted or hereafter amended. Upon surveying the property, the surveyor shall place temporary stakes on the property to enable the county to locate and assess features of the long plat in the field. The datum to be used for all surveying and mapping shall be as follows: The projection name is the state plane; the projection spheroid is GRS 1980; the coordinate system is the Washington State Plane North Zone; and the horizontal datum is NAD 83. (2) All geographic information portrayed by the preliminary plat shall be accurate, legible and drawn to a horizontal scale of 50 feet or fewer to the inch, except that the location sketch and typical roadway cross-sections may be drawn to any other appropriate scale. (3) A preliminary plat shall be 18 inches by 24 inches in size, allowing one-half-inch borders, and if more than one sheet is needed, each sheet shall be numbered consecutively and an index sheet showing the entire property and orienting the other sheets, at any appropriate scale, shall be provided. In addition to other map submittals, the applicant shall submit one copy of each sheet reduced to 8-1/2 inches by 11-1/2 inches in size. If more than one sheet is required, an index sheet showing the entire subdivision with road and highway names and block number (if any) shall be provided. Each sheet, including the index sheet, shall be of the above-specified size. (4) The area of each proposed lot or parcel depicted on the long plat map shall accurately show that each lot, tract or parcel contains sufficient area to satisfy minimum zoning requirements. The area of land contained in access easements, access panhandles or pipestem configurations shall not be included in the lot size computations. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.300 Preliminary plat- Contents. (1) A preliminary plat shall be submitted on one or more sheets and shall provide the following information. All specifications for public improvements shall conform to the standards contained in Chapter 18.30 JCC, including any standards incorporated therein: (a) The name of the proposed subdivision together with the words "Preliminary Plat"; (b) The name and address of the applicant; (c) The name, address, stamp and signature of the professional engineer or professional land surveyor who prepared the preliminary plat; (d) Numeric scale 50 feet or fewer to the inch), graphic scale, true north point, and date of preparation; (e) Identification of all land intended to be cleared, and the location of the proposed access to the site for clearing and grading during site development and construction; and (f) A form for the endorsement of the administrator of the department of community development, as follows: http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 22 of 42 APPROVED BY JEFFERSON COUNTY Department of Community Date Development Administrator (2) The preliminary plat shall contain a vicinity sketch sufficient to define the location and boundaries of the proposed subdivision with respect to surrounding property, roads, and other major constructed and natural features. (3) Except as otherwise specified in this chapter, the preliminary plat shall contain the following existing geographic features, drawn lightly in relation to proposed geographic features: (a) The boundaries of the property to be subdivided, and the boundaries of any adjacent property under the same ownership as the land to be subdivided, to be indicated by bold lines; (b) The names of all adjoining property owners, or names of adjoining developers; (c) All existing property lines lying within the proposed subdivision, including lot lines for lot of record which are to be vacated, and all existing property lines for any property lying adjacent to the subject property which is under the same ownership as the property to be subdivided (as described in JCC 18.35.290(3)) shall be shown in broken lines; (d) The location, right-of-way widths, pavement widths and names of all existing or platted roads, whether public or private, and other public ways within 200 feet of the property to be subdivided; (e) The location, widths and purposes of any existing easements lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision; (f) The location, size and invert elevation of sanitary sewer lines and stormwater management facilities lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision or those that will be connected to as part of the proposed subdivision (if applicable); (g) The location and size of existing water system facilities including all fire hydrants lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision or those which will be connected to as part of the proposed subdivision (if applicable); (h) The location, size and description of any other underground and overhead facilities lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision (if applicable); (i) The location of any environmentally sensitive areas as described in Article VI-D of Chapter 18.15 JCC, including all floodplains, lying within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision; (j) The location of existing sections and municipal corporation boundary lines lying Y Y 9 within or adjacent to the proposed subdivision; http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 23 of 42 (k) The location of any well existing within the proposed subdivision, O Y 9 P P , (I) The location of any individual or on-site sewage disposal system existing within the proposed subdivision; (m) Existing contour lines at intervals of five feet labeled at intervals not to exceed 20 feet; (n) The location of any existing structures lying within the proposed subdivision; existing structures to be removed shall be indicated by broken lines, and existing structures not to be removed shall be indicated by solid lines. (4) The preliminary plat shall show the following proposed geographic features: (a) The boundaries in bold solid lines of all proposed lots, the area and dimensions of each proposed lot, and the proposed identifying number or letter to be assigned to each lot and/or block; (b) The right-of-way location and width, the proposed name of each road, street, alley, or other public way to be created and the estimated tentative grades of such streets; where roadways may exceed the maximum allowable grade or alignment, the director of the department of public works may require sufficient data, including centerline profiles and cross-sections if necessary, to determine the feasibility of said roadway; (c) The location, width and purpose of each easement created; (d) The boundaries, dimensions and area of public and common park and open space areas; (e) Identification of all areas proposed to be dedicated for public use, together with the purpose and any condition of dedication; (f) Proposed final contour lines at intervals of five feet; final contour lines shall be indicated by solid lines; contour lines shall be labeled in intervals not to exceed 20 feet; (g) The building envelopes, as defined in JCC 18.10.020, shall be indicated for each lot; (h) Proposed monumentation; (i) Proposed location and description of all individual or community wells, or water system improvements, including all proposed fire hydrants (if applicable); (j) Proposed location and description of all sewage disposal improvements, including Of applicable) profiles, and, if needed, all pump stations and their connections to the existing system; (k) Proposed location and description of all stormwater management system improvements; http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 24 of 42 (I) Proposed road cross-sections, showing proposed bicycle and pedestrian pathways, trails and sidewalks (if applicable); (m) Proposed type and location of road lighting Of applicable); (n) Proposed type and location of landscaping (if applicable); (o) Proposed location and description of transit stops and shelters (if applicable); (p) Proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs) on development (if applicable). (5) Upon review of an application, the administrator may require additional pertinent information as needed to satisfy any other regulatory requirements. The administrator may also waive specific submittal requirements determined to be unnecessary for review of an application. In such event, the administrator shall document the waiver in the project file or log. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.310 Approval criteria. In addition to the review criteria provided Chapter 18.40 JCC, the following criteria are the minimum measures by which each proposed subdivision will be considered: (1) Long subdivisions shall be given preliminary approval, including preliminary approval subject to conditions, upon finding by the county that all of the following have been satisfied: (a) The proposed subdivision conforms to all applicable county, state and federal zoning, land use, environmental and health regulations and plans, including, but not limited to, the following: (i) The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan; and (ii) The provisions of this code, including any incorporated standards; (b) Utilities and other public services necessary to serve the needs of the proposed subdivision shall be made available, including open spaces, drainage ways, roads, streets, other public ways, potable water, transit facilities, sewage disposal, parks, playgrounds, schools, sidewalks and other improvements that assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school; (c) The probable significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed subdivision, together with any practical means of mitigating adverse impacts, have been considered such that the proposal will not have an unacceptable adverse effect upon the quality of the environment, in accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) implementing provisions contained within Chapter 18.40 JCC and Chapter 43.21C RCW; (d) Approving the proposed subdivision will serve the public use and interest and adequate provision has been made for the public health, safety, and general welfare. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 25 of 42 (2) Notwithstanding approval criteria set forth in subsection (1) of this section, in accordance with RCW 58.17.120, as now adopted and hereafter amended, a proposed subdivision may be denied because of flood, inundation or swamp conditions. Where any portion of the proposed subdivision lies within both a flood control zone, as specified by Chapter 86.16 RCW, and either the 100-year floodplain or the regulatory floodway, the county shall not approve the preliminary plat unless: (a) The applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the hearing examiner that no feasible alternative exists to locating lots and building envelopes within the 100- year floodplain; and (b) It imposes a condition requiring the applicant to comply with Article VI-F of Chapter 18.15 JCC and any written recommendations of the Washington State Department of Ecology. In such cases, the county shall issue no development permit associated with the proposed short subdivision until flood control problems have been resolved. (3) Pursuant to RCW 86.56.345 current year and any delinquent taxes must be paid before approval of any subdivision. [Ord. 8-06 § 11 18.35.320 Preliminary long plat review process. (1) An application for a full subdivision shall be processed according to the procedures for Type III land use decisions established in Chapter 18.40 JCC. (2) The administrator shall solicit comments from the director of the department of public works, the chief of the fire district in which the proposal is located, local utility providers, sheriff, building official, school district in which the proposal is located, adjacent jurisdictions if the proposal is located within one mile of a city or other jurisdiction, Washington State Department of Transportation, if the proposal is adjacent to a state highway, and any other state, local or federal officials as may be necessary. (3) Based on comments from county departments, applicable agencies and other information, the administrator shall review the proposal subject to the criteria contained in JCC 18.35.310. A proposed long subdivision shall only be approved when consistent with all the provisions of JCC 18.35.310. (4) An applicant for a long subdivision may request that certain requirements established or referenced by this chapter be modified. Such requests shall be processed according to the procedures for variances in Chapter 18.40 JCC, and shall satisfy the criteria contained in Article IV of Chapter 18.40 JCC, Variances. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.330 Preliminary plat approval — Phased development. Where subdivision development is proposed in distinct phases, preliminary plat approval must be granted for the entire subdivision. The plat map must delineate the separate divisions or phases that are to be developed in increments. The preliminary approval is conditional upon completion of the proposed phases in a particular sequence and may specify a completion date for each phase. Final plat approval is granted for each separate phase of the preliminary plat. Any changes in the development after preliminary approval will require approval in accordance with JCC 18.35.320. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 26 of 42 18.35.340 Modifications to an approved preliminary plat. (1) Minor modifications to a previously approved preliminary long plat may be requested by the applicant and approved by the administrator subject to the provisions for Type I decisions in Chapter 18.40 JCC; provided, that the modification does involve any of the following: (a) The location or relocation of a road or street; (b) The creation of an additional lot, tract or parcel; (c) The creation of a lot, tract or parcel that does not qualify as a buildable lot pursuant to this code; (d) The relocation of an entire lot, tract or parcel from one parent parcel into another parent parcel. (2) Before approving such an amendment, the administrator shall make written findings and conclusions documenting the following conditions: (a) The modification will not be inconsistent or cause the long subdivision to be inconsistent with the decision of the county preliminarily approving the application; (b) The modification will not violate the intent of the original conditions of application approval; and (c) The modification will not cause the long subdivision to violate any applicable county policy or regulation. (3) Modifications that involve the circumstances described in subsection (1) of this section, or exceed the criteria set forth in subsection (2) of this section, shall be processed as a new preliminary long plat application. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.350 Surety. Subdivision applicants may be required to post a surety guaranteeing completion of subdivision improvements within one year of final plat approval. The surety shall be for 200 percent of the cost of construction of those improvements estimated by a licensed engineer. Surety shall be in a form acceptable to Jefferson County. In the event that the applicant does not complete construction within one year Jefferson County shall be authorized to complete the construction and pay for the work from the surety account. Surety shall not be accepted for developing potable water sources. Surety may only be released only after inspection by Jefferson County. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.360 Director of public works certificate of improvements. No permit for the construction of improvements within an approved subdivision shall be issued by the county until the improvement method report, all construction drawings, proposed performance guarantees, and other submittals in conformance with Chapter 18.30 JCC and any incorporated standards have been received and approved by the director of the department of public works. All construction of improvements shall be inspected and approved in conformance with development standards contained in http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 27 of 42 Chapter 18.30 JCC and any incorporated standards. After completion of all required improvements or the guarantee of the construction of all required improvements, the director of the department of public works shall submit a certificate in triplicate to the administrator stating the required improvements or guarantees are in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, the preliminary plat, including the county's decision approving the plat, and in accordance with the development standards contained in Chapter 18.30 JCC and any incorporated standards. The administrator shall submit one copy of the certification to the subdivider, together with a notice advising the subdivider to prepare a final plat for the proposed subdivision. One copy of the certificate shall be retained by the administrator. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.370 Preparation of a final long plat. The final long plat shall be prepared in accordance with the following requirements: (1) The final plat shall be prepared by a land surveyor licensed by the state of Washington or a Washington state licensed engineer. (2) Six paper copies of the final long plat shall be submitted, measuring 18 inches by 24 inches in size, allowing one-half inch for border. (3) A final long plat shall contain the following information: (a) The name of the subdivision; (b) Legal description of the property being subdivided; (c) Numeric scale, graphic scale, true north point and date of preparation of the final plat; (d) The lot line of the plat, referenced to county (USC&GS) datum and based on an accurate traverse, with angular and linear dimensions and bearings; (e) The exact location, width and name of all roads, streets, alleys and other public ways within and adjacent to the subdivision; (f) The exact location, width and purpose of all easements and dedications for rights -of-way provided for public and private services and utilities; (g) True courses and distances to the nearest established road lines, or sections or quarter section corner monuments which shall accurately locate the subdivision; (h) Section lines accurately tied to the lines of the plat by distances and courses; (i) All lot and block numbers (if applicable) and lines, with accurate dimensions in feet and hundredths of feet; (j) All house address numbers as assigned by the county; (k) Delineation of the building envelope of each lot; http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 28 of 42 (I) The radii, internal angles, points of curvature, tangent bearings and lengths of arc; (m) The accurate location of each permanent control monument; (n) All plat meander lines or reference lines along bodies of water shall be established as above, but not farther than 20 feet from the high water line of such body; (o) Accurate outlines and legal descriptions of any areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose of such dedication or reservation and any limitations indicated thereon and in dedication; (p) Accurate outlines of any area to be reserved by the deed covenant for common use of owners of property within the subdivision, together with the purposes of such reservation; (q) Any restrictions or conditions on the lots or tracts within the subdivision, as required by the county or at the discretion of the property owner, including, but not limited to, environmentally sensitive areas buffers; (r) The auditor's file number of all documents and conveyances recorded with the Jefferson County auditor associated with preliminary or final plat approval; (s) The name and seal of the Washington State licensed land surveyor or Washington State licensed engineer responsible preparation of the final plat, and a signed certification on the plat by said surveyor to the effect that it is a true and correct representation of the land actually surveyed by him or her, that the existing monuments shown thereon exist as located and that all dimensional and geodetic details are correct; (t) A signed, notarized certification stating that the subdivision has been made with the free consent and in accordance with the desires of the all persons with ownership and/or security interests in the property. If the plat includes a dedication, the certificate or a separate written instrument shall contain the dedication of all roads and other areas to the public, any individual or individuals, or to any corporation, public or private, as shown on the plat. Such certificate or instrument shall be signed and acknowledged before a notary public by all parties having any interest in the land subdivided. The owner shall waive all claims against the county, on behalf of the owner and the owner's successors and assigns, which may be occasioned by the establishment and/or construction of any roads, streets, storm drainage improvements or other improvements; (u) An offer of dedication may include a waiver of right of direct access to any road from any property. Such waiver may be required by the director of the department of public works as a condition of approval. Any dedication, donation or grant as shown on the face of the plat shall be considered as a quit claim deed to the said donee or grantee for use for the purpose intended by the donation or grant; http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 29 of 42 (v) Signature blocks for the appropriate certification of the county auditor, director of the department of public works, director of the public health department, and DCD administrator, as follows: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CERTIFICATE I hereby certify to the best of my knowledge that this final plat is in compliance with the certificate of improvements issued pursuant to the Jefferson County Unified Development Code and is consistent with all applicable county improvement standards and requirements in force on the date of preliminary plat approval, this day of , 20_. Director, Jefferson County Department of Public Works DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR'S CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that on this day of , 20_, that this final plat is in substantial conformance with the preliminary plat and any conditions attached thereto, which preliminary plat was approved by Jefferson County on the day of , 20 . Administrator, Jefferson County Community Development Department JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DIRECTOR CERTIFICATE Approved by public health department on this day of 20 Director, Jefferson County Public Health Dept. TREASURER All taxes and/or assessments due are paid in full on this day of , 20 Jefferson County Treasurer (w) A form of the approval of the county assessor, as follows: ASSESSOR'S APPROVAL Examined and approved this day of , 20 . http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 30 of 42 Jefferson County Assessor Attest: Deputy Jefferson County Assessor (x) A form for the certificate of the Jefferson County recorder, as follows: RECORDING CERTIFICATE Filed for record at the request of Jefferson County this day of , 20 , at minutes past _M., and recorded in Volume of Plats, page Records of Jefferson County, Washington. Jefferson County Recording Number Manager Superintendent of Records (y) Any additional pertinent information as required at the discretion of the director of the department of public works or the DCD administrator. (4) All signatures or certifications appearing on a final plat shall in be reproducible black ink. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.380 Accompanying documents — Final long plat. (1) In cases where any deed covenants or restrictions, including any CC&Rs, will apply to lots or parcels within a subdivision, a typewritten copy of such covenants bearing all necessary signatures shall be submitted along with the final plat. (2) The final plat shall be accompanied by a complete survey of the section or sections in which the plat or replat is located, or as much thereof as may be necessary to properly orient the plat within such section or sections. The plat and section survey shall be submitted with complete field and computation notes, showing the original or re- established corners, with the description of the same, and the actual traverse showing error or closure and method of balancing. A sketch showing all distances, angles and calculations required to determine corners and distances of the plat shall accompany this data. The allowable error of closure shall not exceed one foot in 10,000 feet. (3) The final plat shall be accompanied by a current (within 30 days) title company certification of: (a) The legal description of the total parcel sought to be subdivided; http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 31 of 42 (b) Those individuals or corporations holding an ownership interest and any security interest (such as deed of trust or mortgages) or any other encumbrances affecting the title of said parcel. Such individuals or corporations shall sign and approve the final plat prior to final approval; (c) Any lands to be dedicated shall be confirmed as being owned in fee title by the owner(s) signing the dedication certificate; (d) Any easements or restrictions affecting the property to be subdivided with a description of purpose and referenced by the auditor's file number and/or recording number; and (e) If lands are to be dedicated or conveyed to the county as part of the subdivision, an American Land Title Association (A.L.T.A.) title policy may be required by the director of the department of public works. (4) The applicant shall provide the director of the department of public works with a computer disk containing a complete set of the final plat maps and as-built drawings on CADD(c) or other GIS-compatible software as acceptable to the director of the department of public works. (5) All documents submitted under this section shall contain the name of the subdivision and the name and address of the subdivider. (6) All maintenance, performance and guarantee bonds or other guarantees as may be required by the director of the department of public works and the improvement method report to guarantee the acceptability and/or performance of all improvements. For all improvements constructed after final plat approval, reproducible as-built drawing and CADD(c) files shall be submitted within 15 days of completion of construction. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.390 Final long plat application. (1) Applications for final long plat approval shall be made on forms provided by the department along with the fee established in the Jefferson County fee ordinance. (2) Applications for final plat approval shall be processed according to the procedures for Type IV land use decisions established in Chapter 18.40 JCC, and shall be approved, disapproved, or returned to the applicant within 30 days of their filing, unless the applicant consents to an extension of time in writing. (3) Applications for final plat approval shall be submitted within five years of the date of the preliminary plat approval. (4) The final plat map shall be prepared in accordance with JCC 18.35.300 and 18.35.320. (5) Prior to final approval, with the exception of the recording certificate, the applicant shall obtain all signatures and certifications on the face of the plat in accordance with JCC 18.35.370. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/J effersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 32 of 42 18.35.400 Time limitation on final long plat submittal. The original and three copies of a final long plat meeting all requirements of Chapter 58.17 RCW shall be transmitted by the administrator to the board of county commissioners within five years of the date of the preliminary long plat approval. No extensions shall be granted. A plat granted preliminary approval but filed for final long plat approval following the applicable time period shall be null and void. The department of community development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of an impending preliminary long plat expiration. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.410 Effect of an approved final long plat—Valid land use. Any lots in a final long plat filed for record shall be a valid land use notwithstanding any change in zoning laws for a period of five years from the date of filing. A long subdivision shall be governed by the terms of approval of the final long plat, and the statutes, ordinances and regulations in effect on the date of preliminary long plat approval for a period of five years after final long plat approval unless the board of county commissioners finds that a change in conditions creates a serious threat to the public health or safety of residents within or outside the subdivision. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.420 Distribution of copies and filing of final long plat. The administrator shall distribute the original and copies of the approved final long plat as follows: (1) The original shall be returned to the applicant after it has been forwarded to the county auditor for recording; (2) Prior to the issuance of any building permits, one recorded reproducible copy shall be transmitted to the director of the department of public works; (3) One recorded paper copy shall be retained in the files of the department of community development; and (4) One recorded paper copy shall be provided to the building official for assignment of addresses. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.430 Transfer of ownership following final long plat approval. Whenever any parcel of land lying within the county is divided under the provisions of this article relating to long subdivisions, no person, firm, or corporation shall sell or transfer or advertise for sale or transfer any such lot, tract or parcel without having first received final approval of the long plat and having recorded the final long plat with the Jefferson County auditor. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that a final long plat is fully certified and filed for record with the Jefferson County auditor prior to transferring ownership of any land. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.440 Building and occupancy permits — Issuance after final long plat approval. (1) No building permit for a structure other than a temporary contractor's office or temporary storage building shall be issued for a lot or parcel within an approved long subdivision prior to a determination by the relevant fire district chief or designee that adequate fire protection and access for construction needs exists. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 33 of 42 (2) No building permit for a structure other than a temporary contractor's office or temporary storage building shall be issued for a lot or parcel within an approved long subdivision until the applicant complies with the improvement method report, all requirements of the department of public works certificate of improvements, and all requirements of the final plat approval. (3) No occupancy permit for a structure other than a temporary contractor's office or other approved temporary building shall be issued for a structure on a lot or parcel within an approved long subdivision prior to final inspection and approval of all required improvements which will serve such lot or parcel to the satisfaction of the director of the department of public works and county building official. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] Article V. Binding Site Plans 18.35.450 Purpose. The purpose of this article is to clearly delineate the criteria used by the county to review and approve binding site plans. A binding site plan is intended to provide an alternative means of dividing land. The binding site plan process provides a means for certain types of land division applications to be processed administratively based upon the development standards and regulations contained within this code and any other applicable ordinances and regulations. Binding site plans tie a future development to an approved set of conditions and site layout. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.460 Scope. This article shall only apply to one or more of the following: (1) The use of a binding site plan to divisions of land for sale or lease of mixed use, commercial or industrial zoned property where the applicant proposes a unified scheme of development; (2) Divisions of property for residential, commercial or industrial condominium development as provided for in JCC 18.35.470; and (3) Planned rural residential developments (PRRDs) proposed under Article VI-M of Chapter 18.15 JCC where full short or long subdivision of the land into separate, legally segregated lots, tracts or parcels is not required. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.470 Condominiums. For the purpose of approval of condominium developments, the provisions of this chapter regarding short subdivision and long subdivision shall not apply if: (1) A land division is proposed as a condominium and does not result in the subdivision of land into separately owned lots in accordance with the definition for short or long subdivisions, but subjects a portion of a lot, tract or parcel to Chapter 64.34 RCW (the "Condominium Act") subsequent to the recording of a binding site plan for all such land; (2) The improvements constructed or to be constructed thereon are required by the provisions of the binding site plan proposed for a condominium project; (3) Jefferson County has approved a binding site plan for all such land; and http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 34 of 42 (4) The binding site plan contains the following statement: All development and use of the land described herein shall be in accordance with this binding site plan, as it may be amended with the approval of Jefferson County, and in accordance with such other government permits, approvals, regulations, requirements, and restrictions that may be imposed upon such land and the development and use thereof. Upon completion, the improvements on the land shall be included in one (1) or more condominiums or owned by an association or other legal entity in which the owners' associations have a membership or other legal or beneficial interest. This binding site plan shall be binding upon all persons, businesses, corporations, partnerships or other entities now or hereafter having any interest in the land described herein. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.480 Application submittal and contents. To be considered complete, applications for binding site plan approval shall include the following information: (1) Applications for binding site plans shall be made on forms provided by the Jefferson County department of community development and shall be submitted to the department of community development, along with the appropriate fees established under the Jefferson County fee ordinance; (2) A completed land use permit application form, including all materials required pursuant to Chapter 18.40 JCC; (3) Mixed Use, Commercial and Industrial Binding Site Plans. In addition to materials required pursuant to subsections (1) and (2) of this section, a binding site plan application for mixed use, commercial or industrial proposals shall contain the same elements and information as a preliminary long plat, in accordance with JCC 18.35.280, 18.35.290 and 18.35.300; (4) Binding Site Plan for Residential Condominiums. In addition the materials required pursuant to subsections (1) and (2) of this section, a binding site plan for residential condominiums shall conform to the requirements of Chapter 64.34 RCW, the "Condominium Act." The applicant shall submit a sworn declaration from a registered land surveyor licensed in the state of Washington that all requirements of RCW 64.34.232, as now adopted and hereafter amended, have been satisfied. The county shall not be responsible for verification that the proposal complies with Chapter 64.34 RCW, but may rely upon the representation of the licensed surveyor. The applicant shall submit five copies of the binding site plan map for review. The site plan shall have dimensions of 18 inches by 24 inches and must be prepared by a registered surveyor licensed in the state of Washington. In addition to the requirements of Chapter 64.34 RCW, the binding site plan map must include the following information: (a) The name of the condominium project; http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 35 of 42 (b) Legal description of the entire parcel; (c) The date, scale, and north arrow; (d) Boundary lines, rights-of-way for roads, streets, easements, and property lines of lots, the location of all open spaces, utilities, and other improvements with accurate bearings, dimensions of angles and arcs, and of all curve data describing the location of all improvements; (e) Names and right-of-way widths of all roads or streets within the parcel and immediately adjacent to the parcel. Street names shall be consistent with the names of existing adjacent streets; (f) Number of each lot and each block or division; (g) Location, dimensions and purpose of any easements, noting if the easements are public or private; (h) Location and description of monuments, boundary corners set, and all lot corners set and found; (i) Datum elevations and primary control points approved by the department of public works. Descriptions and ties to all control points will be shown with dimensions, angles, and bearings; (j) A dedicatory statement acknowledging public and private dedications and grants; (k) The statement required by JCC 18.35.470(4) must be on the face of the final binding site plan; and (I) Other restrictions, conditions, and requirements as deemed necessary by the county, including all applicable development standards contained in Chapter 18.30 JCC and any standards incorporated therein. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.490 Binding site plan approval criteria. (1) Binding site plans shall be approved upon showing that all of the following have been satisfied: (a) The proposed binding site plan conforms to all applicable county, state and federal zoning, land use, environmental and health regulations and plans, including but not limited to the following: (i) The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan; and (ii) The provisions of this code, including any incorporated standards; (b) Utilities and other public services necessary to serve the needs of the proposed binding site plan shall be made available, including open spaces, drainage ways, roads, streets and other public ways, potable water, transit facilities, sewage disposal, parks, playgrounds, schools, sidewalks and other improvements to assure safe walking conditions for students who walk to and from school; http://www.codepubli shing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 36 of 42 (c) The probable significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed binding site plan, together with any practical means of mitigating adverse impacts, have been considered such that the proposal will not have an unacceptable adverse effect upon the quality of the environment, in accordance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) implementing provisions contained within Chapter 18.40 JCC and Chapter 43.21 C RCW; (d) Approving the proposed binding site plan will serve the public use and interest and adequate provision has been made for the public health, safety and general welfare. (2) Notwithstanding the approval criteria set forth in subsection (1) of this section, a proposed binding site plan may be denied because of flood, inundation or swamp conditions. Where any portion of the proposed binding site plan lies within both a flood control zone, as specified by Chapter 86.16 RCW, and either the 100-year floodplain or the regulatory floodway, the county shall not approve the binding site plan unless: (a) The applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the administrator that no feasible alternative exists to locating lots and building envelopes within the 100-year floodplain; and (b) It imposes a condition requiring the applicant to comply with Article VI-F of Chapter 18.15 JCC and any written recommendations of the Washington State Department of Ecology. In such cases, the county shall issue no development permit associated with the proposed binding site plan until flood control problems have been resolved. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.500 Binding site plan review process. (1) An application for a binding site plan approval shall be processed according to the procedures for Type III land use decisions established in Chapter 18.40 JCC. (2) The administrator shall solicit comments from the director of the department of public works, the chief of the fire district in which the proposal is located, local utility providers, sheriff, building official, school district in which the proposal is located, adjacent jurisdictions if the proposal is within one mile of a city or other jurisdiction, Washington State Department of Transportation if the proposal is adjacent to a state highway, and any other local, state or federal officials as may be necessary. (3) Based upon comments from county departments and applicable agencies, and other information, the administrator shall review the proposal subject to the criteria of JCC 18.35.490. A proposed binding site plan shall only be approved when consistent with all the provisions of JCC 18.35.490. Binding site plan approval may be based upon certain delineated conditions. The county shall make written finding and conclusions documenting compliance with all approval criteria. A binding site plan shall be granted preliminary approval only, until all improvements are installed or the county has received adequate guarantees or assurances of future installation of improvements. (4) Upon satisfying all conditions of approval, if any, and satisfying all requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC and any incorporated standards for the installation of all http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 37 of 42 improvements, the administrator shall administratively approve the final binding site plan for filing with the Jefferson County assessor. The final binding site plan shall conform to the requirements of JCC 18,35.370 and 18.35.380, as applicable. (5) For all condominium projects, prior to final approval, the applicant shall obtain the written approval from the Jefferson County assessor of the condominium CC&Rs. [Ord. 8 -06 § 1] 18.35.510 Binding site plan development standards. Binding site plans shall conform to the development standards contained in Article VI of this chapter. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.520 Modifications and vacations. Binding site plans may be modified or vacated subject to the following: (1) Binding site plans may be modified only if the modification is minor in nature and the original intent of the recorded binding site plan is not changed and if the modification does not adversely impact public health and safety, the environment, or the delivery of services to the site. The proposed modification must be clearly shown and be accompanied by a letter of explanation and application for a plat alteration. Upon administrative approval of such modification, the modifications shall become part of the binding site plan. If the proposed modification constitutes a substantial modification, the proposal shall be processed as a new binding site plan application. (2) Prior to issuance of any building permit or other site development permits, including, but not limited to, clearing and grading permits, a binding site plan may be vacated as a whole only. Vacating a binding site plan releases all conditions and obligations on the parcel associated with such plan. A binding site plan may be vacated with the submission to DCD of a letter of intent to vacate the binding site plan. The letter shall become binding upon its acceptance by the administrator. If the binding site plan has been recorded with the Jefferson County auditor, notice of the vacation shall be recorded on forms acceptable to the Jefferson County auditor. (3) After issuance of any building or other site development permits, including, but not limited to, clearing and grading permits, the process for vacation of all or part of a binding site plan is identical to the process for initial binding site plan approval. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.530 Distribution of copies and filing. (1) Upon approval, a binding site plan shall follow the procedures of JCC 18.35.420. (2) After approval of the general binding site plan for commercial or industrial divisions, the approval for improvements and finalization of specific individual commercial and industrial lots shall be done by administrative approval. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.540 Time limit. The applicant or owner of the property subject to a binding site plan shall obtain all permits for the development of a site within five years of its recording under JCC 18.35.530. If the applicant fails to obtain all permits within five years, no site development http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 38 of 42 permits shall be issued until the applicant files a new application and obtains binding site plan approval in accordance with this article. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.550 Extinguishment of binding site plans with preliminary approval prior to UDC adoption. The applicant or owner of a property subject to a binding site plan having preliminary approval prior to the initial adoption date of this Unified Development Code (UDC) shall obtain final approval of the binding site plan within two years of the initial adoption of this code. If the applicant fails to obtain final binding site plan approval within two years, no site development permits shall be issued until the applicant files a new application and obtains binding site plan approval in accordance with this article. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.560 Effect of final binding site plan approval. (1) All provisions, conditions, and requirements of the binding site plan shall be legally enforceable on the purchaser of any other person acquiring a lease or other legal or property interest of any lot, tract, or parcel created pursuant to the binding site plan. (2) Any sale, transfer, or lease of any lot, tract or parcel created pursuant to the binding site plan, that does not conform to the requirements of the binding site plan, or without binding site plan approval, shall be considered a violation of this article. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] Article VI. Subdivision Development Standards 18.35.570 Requirements for improvements. All improvements shall be designed and constructed in conformance with the development standards contained in this article, as well as Chapter 18.30 JCC and any standards incorporated therein. Prior to construction of any improvements, as approved upon the preliminary plat or binding site plan, the subdivider shall furnish construction plans. These plans must be prepared, signed, dated and stamped by a Washington State licensed civil engineer and shall be in accordance with the standards contained in Chapter 18.30 JCC. The construction plans must be reviewed and approved by the county prior to construction. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.580 Transportation and drainage standards. (1) Transportation Standards — Generally. All divisions of land covered by this chapter shall be served by appropriate transportation facilities, including roads and facilities for transit, pedestrians, and bicycles. Transportation facilities shall be adequate both the serve the division of land and to avoid adverse effects to the existing transportation system. If transportation facilities are inadequate, the applicant shall be required to make provision for all necessary improvements. Transportation facilities shall be deemed adequate if necessary improvements are planned and designated funding is secured in the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program. (2) Road and Drainage Design and Construction Standards. (a) All roads serving two or more lots shall comply with the road design and construction standards specified in JCC 18.30.080; http://www.codepubl ishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/J effersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 39 of 42 (b) A drainage analysis shall be performed in conformance with JCC 18.30.070, and drainage systems shall be designed to the standards set forth in JCC 18.30.060(2) and 18.30.070. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.590 Responsibility for road improvements. Where reasonably necessary to mitigate the direct impacts of the proposed division of land and/or to meet safety requirements, off-site road improvements may be required as a condition of approval under this chapter. When required, the applicant shall bear the sole responsibility to make such off-site road improvements. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.600 Health standards. The following health standards apply to all divisions of land governed by this chapter: (1) Water. All divisions of land shall comply with the requirements established by the Jefferson County department of health for the provision of water; (2) Wastewater Disposal. All divisions of land shall comply with the requirements established by the Jefferson County department of health for wastewater disposal; and (3) Storm Drainage. Stormwater flows from land divisions shall not adversely affect critical aquifer recharge areas. All divisions of land shall meet the regulations for critical aquifer recharge areas contained in Article VI-E of Chapter 18.15 JCC. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.610 Fire and utility standards. All divisions of land governed by this chapter shall meet the fire protection and improvement standards adopted by Jefferson County. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.620 Plan review, inspection and fees. The department of community development and department of public works are responsible for reviewing all engineering drawings and for the supervision, inspection and acceptance of all subdivision improvements, and shall charge the subdivider the applicable fees as set forth in the Jefferson County fee ordinance. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.630 Release of improvement guarantee. If an improvement bond or other guarantee has been submitted, such guarantee shall be released in accordance with the development standards contained in Chapter 18.30 JCC. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.640 Floods and flood control. The county may disapprove a proposed subdivision because of flood, inundation or regulated wetlands if the county finds that such condition poses a threat to the public health, safety or general welfare. Where any portion of the proposed subdivision lies within both a flood control zone, as specified by Chapter 86.16 RCW, and either the 100- year floodplain or the regulatory floodway, the county shall impose a condition on the preliminary plat requiring the subdivider to conform to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood hazard requirements. In such cases, no development permit associated with the proposed subdivision shall be issued by the county until said FEMA requirements have been met. Where feasible, the county may require that all lots and/or building envelopes be located outside the 100-year floodplain. The county may http://www.codepub]ishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 40 of 42 also require dedication of land to any public body and/or the construction of improvements and may impose other conditions necessary to protect against flooding or inundation. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.650 Additional requirements. The standards or requirements established in this chapter and Chapter 18.30 JCC are minimum requirements. These standards may be increased and additional requirements may be imposed for the purpose of mitigating identified probable significant adverse environmental impacts pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, as now established or hereafter amended. Such additional requirements may include, but are not limited to, off-site improvements to any public facility, the dedication and/or improvement of parks and open spaces, and contributions to any county fund established to finance the provision of public services required by subdivision. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.660 Phased subdivision. Preliminary plat approval must be granted for the entire subdivision and must delineate the separate divisions that are to be developed in phased increments. Where the preliminary plat approval is conditioned upon completion of the proposed phases in a particular sequence, the preliminary plat approval shall specify a completion date for each phase. Final plat approval may be granted for each separate phase of the preliminary plat. Any changes at the preliminary plat stage will require approval in accordance with JCC 18.35.340. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] Article VII. Plat Alteration 18.35.670 Purpose. (1) To allow modifications to approved short plats, binding site plans, and subdivisions including: (a) The creation of additional lots within an existing subdivision or short plat containing four or fewer lots within five years of final approval; (b) Revision of lot lines, notes, notice to purchasers, or easements established in a recorded plat; (c) Vacation, in whole or in part, of a subdivision, binding site plan, mobile home park, RV park, short subdivision, or large lot subdivision. (2) This section does not apply to alteration or replatting of any plat of state-granted tide or shore lands. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.680 Application submittal and contents. To be considered complete, applications for plat alterations shall include the following: (1) Applications for plat alterations shall be made on forms provided by the Jefferson County department of community development and shall be submitted to the department of community development, along with the appropriate fees established under the Jefferson County fee ordinance; http://www.codepubl ishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 41 of 42 (2) A completed land use permit application form, including all materials required pursuant to Chapter 18.40 JCC; (3) Current title company certification/plat certificate. (a) For a plat vacation, signatures of all parties having an ownership interest, including deeds of trust, in that portion of the short plat, long plat, or binding site plan subject to the proposed vacation; or (b) For a plat alteration or replat, signatures of a majority of those parties having an ownership interest, including deeds of trust, of the lots, tracts, parcels, sites or divisions in the subject short plat, long plat or binding site plan, or portion to be altered; or (c) For a plat alteration affecting open space, easements, or public or private rights- of-way signatures of all parties that make use of the portion being altered; (4) A copy of any covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs), deed restrictions, easements, planned rural residential development (PRRD) agreements, or other encumbrances restricting the use of the property; (5) Five paper copies of the plat map and any surveys of record, with proposed alteration (s) or vacation(s) depicted in red ink. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.35.690 Review process and criteria. (1) An application for a plat amendment shall be processed according to the procedures for Type II land use decisions established in Chapter 18.40 JCC and the criteria listed in RCW 58.17,215; (2) Notice shall be given to the affected parties, a public hearing may be requested by a person receiving notice within 14 days of receipt of notice. When a public hearing is requested the application shall be processed according to the procedures for Type Ill decisions established in Chapter 18.40 JCC and the criteria listed in RCW 58.17.215; (3) The administrator shall solicit comments from the director of the department of public works, the chief of the fire district in which the proposal is located, local utility providers, sheriff, building official, school district in which the proposal is located, adjacent jurisdictions if the proposal is within one mile of a city or other jurisdiction, Washington State Department of Transportation if the proposal is adjacent to a state highway, and any other local, state or federal officials as may be necessary; (4) Based on comments from county departments, applicable agencies and other information, the administrator shall review the proposal subject to the criteria contained in this section. A proposed plat amendment shall only be approved when consistent with all the provisions of JCC 18 35.690 and RCW 58.17.215. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.35 LAND DIVISIONS Page 42 of 42 This page of the Jefferson County Code is current through County Website: Ordinance Ord. 10-10, passed December 16, 2010. http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/ Disclaimer: The Clerk of the Board's Office has the official version (http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/) of the Jefferson County Code. Users should contact the Clerk of County Telephone: (360) 385-9133 the Board's Office for ordinances passed subsequent to the Code Publishing Company ordinance cited above. (http://www.codepublishing.com/) http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 9 of 67 Buffer are which are bo •hysically separ- =d and functio Ily isolated fr m a criti I area and o of protect e cn cal area fro ad -rse impa s s all be ex ud d from , buffers then rise requ ed by th s chapter. Functi. al isol ion c n occ due tb exi ing', public oads, structures, vertical epara .ng, or any��other elevant by cal charact istic.• The dministraVrilay require a b'•lo:ical site asse s ent to dete ine whethe e er is functionally isolated. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] Article III. Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas 18.22.100 Classification. Critical aquifer recharge areas are naturally susceptible due to the existence of permeable soils or a seawater wedge in coastline aquifers. Certain overlying land uses can lead to water quality and/or quantity degradation. The following classifications define critical aquifer recharge areas: (1) Susceptible aquifer recharge areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. For the purposes of this article, unless otherwise determined by preparation of an aquifer recharge area report authorized under this article, the following geologic units, as identified from available State of Washington Department of Natural Resources geologic mapping, define susceptible aquifer recharge areas for east Jefferson County: (a) Alluvial fans (Ha); (b) Artificial fill (Hx); (c) Beach sand and gravel (Hb); (d) Dune sand (Hd); (e) Floodplain alluvium (Hf); (f) Vashon recessional outwash in deltas and alluvial fans (Vrd); (g) Vashon recessional outwash in melt water channels (Vro); (h) Vashon ice contact stratified drift (Vi); (i) Vashon ablation till (Vat); (j) Vashon advance outwash (Vao); (k) Whidbey formation (Pw); and (I) Pre-Vashon stratified drift (Py). (2) Those areas meeting the requirements of susceptible aquifer recharge areas (above) and which are overlain by the following land uses as identified in this code are subject to the provisions of the protection standards in this article: (a) All industrial land uses; http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 10 of 67 (b) All commercial uses; (c) All rural residential land uses: (i) Requiring a discretionary use or conditional use permit; or (ii) With nonconforming uses that would otherwise require a discretionary use or conditional use permit; (d) Unsewered planned rural residential developments: (e) Unsewered residential development with gross densities greater than one unit per acre. (3) Special aquifer recharge protection areas include: (a) Sole-source aquifers designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in accordance with the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-523); (b) Special protection areas designated by the Washington Department of Ecology under Chapter 173-200 WAC; (c) Wellhead protection areas determined in accordance with delineation methodologies specified by the Washington Department of Health under authority of Chapter 246-290 WAC; (d) Groundwater management areas designated by the Washington Department of Ecology in cooperation with local government under Chapter 173-100 WAC. (4) Seawater intrusion protection zones (SIPZ) are aquifers and land overlying aquifers with some degree of vulnerability to seawater intrusion. SIPZ are defined either by proximity to marine shoreline or by proximity to groundwater sources that have demonstrated high chloride readings. All islands and land area within one-quarter mile of marine shorelines and associated aquifers together compose the coastal SIPZ. Additionally, areas within 1,000 feet of a groundwater source with a history of chloride analyses above 100 milligrams per liter (mg/L) are categorized as either at risk (between 100 mg/L and 200 mg/L) or high risk (over 200 mg/L) SIPZ. Individual groundwater sources with a history of chloride analyses above 200 mg/L shall be considered "sea-salt water intrusion areas," which are among the "sources or potential sources of contamination" listed in WAC 173-160-171, implementing code for the Water Well Construction Act. (a) In some cases, high chloride readings may be indicative of connate seawater (i.e., relic seawater in aquifers as opposed to active seawater intrusion). When best available science or a hydrogeologic assessment demonstrate that high chloride readings in a particular area are due to connate seawater, the area in question shall not be considered an at risk or high risk SIPZ. When the status of an area is in question, the UDC administrator is responsible for making the determination based upon recommendation from county department of health and human services. [Ord, 3-08 § 1] http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 11 of 67 18.22.110 Designation. Jefferson County shall prepare and exhibit dated critical aquifer recharge area maps which demonstrate the approximate distribution of the susceptible aquifer recharge areas, special aquifer recharge protection areas, and seawater intrusion protection zones. The critical aquifer recharge area maps shall be periodically revised, modified, and updated to reflect additional information. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.120 Applicability. (1) The following land use activities are considered high impact land uses due to the probability and/or potential magnitude of their adverse effects on groundwater and shall be prohibited in susceptible aquifer recharge areas and special aquifer recharge protection areas. In all other areas of the county outside of susceptible aquifer recharge areas and special aquifer recharge protection areas, these activities shall require an aquifer recharge area report pursuant to this article: (a) Chemical manufacturing and reprocessing; (b) Creosote/asphalt manufacturing or treatment (except that asphalt batch plants may be permitted in susceptible aquifer recharge areas only if such areas lie outside of special aquifer recharge protection areas and only if best management practices are implemented pursuant to JCC 18.20.240 (2)(h)(iv) and 18.30.170 and an accepted aquifer recharge area report); (c) Electroplating and metal coating activities; (d) Hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facilities; (e) Petroleum product refinement and reprocessing; (f) Storage tanks for petroleum products or other hazardous substances, except with a conditional discretionary use "C(d)" permit approval; (g) Recycling facilities as defined in this code; (h) Solid waste landfills; (i) Waste piles as defined in Chapter 173-304 WAC; 0) Wood and wood products preserving; (k) Storage and primary electrical battery processing and reprocessing. (2) All other land uses shall be subject to the protection standards contained in this article and mitigating conditions included with an aquifer recharge area report, where applicable. (3) Seawater Intrusion Protection Zones. Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drilled on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 12 of 67 interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals (primarily through wells). New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible. [Ord. 4-10 § 1 (Exh. By Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.130 Protection standards. (1) General. The following protection standards shall apply to land use activities in susceptible aquifer recharge areas and special aquifer protection areas, and when specified in seawater intrusion protection zones, unless mitigating conditions have been identified in a critical aquifer recharge report that has been prepared pursuant to this article. (2) Stormwater Disposal. (a) In all critical aquifer recharge areas, stormwater runoff shall be controlled and treated in accordance with best management practices and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin, as amended, and the stormwater provisions contained in Chapter 18.30 JCC. (b) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within one- quarter mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff on site. The administrator will consider requests for exceptions to this policy on a case-by-case basis. This provision is interpreted as establishing a hierarchy in which the first and best alternative is on-site infiltration using drywells or other methods; the second best alternative is direct discharge into marine waters through a stormwater tightline. In order to utilize the least preferred alternative, which is considered an exception to the policy, applicants must demonstrate through a geotechnical or similar report prepared by a licensed professional that both on-site infiltration and upland off-site disposal are not practicable or feasible. The report must include cost figures for comparison. (3) On-Site Sewage Disposal. (a) All land uses identified in JCC 18.22.120 and special aquifer recharge protection areas that are also classified as susceptible aquifer recharge areas (as defined in this article) shall be designated areas of special concern pursuant to WAC Title 246. (i) Such designation shall identify minimum land area and best management practices for nitrogen removal as design parameters necessary for the protection of public health and groundwater quality. (ii) Best management practices (BMPs) shall be adopted by action of the board of health. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 13 of 67 (b) As new information becomes available that would classify an area as a special aquifer recharge protection area or an area of special concern under this article, said area may be designated as such by the county. Any additional areas of special concern designated through this process shall receive the same protections identified in subsection (3)(a) of this section. (4) Golf Courses and Other Turf Cultivation. In all critical aquifer recharge areas, golf courses shall be developed and operated in a manner consistent with the most current edition of"Best Management Practices for Golf Course Development and Operation," King County department of development and environmental services. Recreational and institutional facilities (e.g., parks and schools) with extensive areas of cultivated turf shall be operated in a manner consistent with portions of the aforementioned best management practices pertaining to fertilizer and pesticide use, storage, and disposal. In seawater intrusion protection zones, golf courses and other turf cultivation using groundwater for irrigation shall be prohibited, unless the water source is located outside of seawater intrusion protection zones or in an approved public water supply. (5) Above-Ground Storage and Underground Storage Tanks. Above-ground and underground storage tanks shall be fabricated, constructed, installed, used and operated in a manner which prevents the release of hazardous substances to the ground or groundwater and be consistent with the Department of Ecology's standards for construction and installation under Chapter 173-360 WAC. Above-ground storage tanks intended to hold or store hazardous substances shall be provided with an impervious containment area, equivalent to or greater than 100 percent of the tank volume, enclosing and underlying the tank; or ensure that other measures are undertaken as prescribed by the Uniform Fire Code which provide an equivalent measure of protection. Underground storage tanks intended to store hazardous substances shall provide an impervious tertiary containment area underlying the tanks or ensure that other measures are undertaken which provide an equivalent measure of protection. Application for installation of underground storage tanks not prohibited under this article, or application for a conditional discretionary "C(d)" use permit approval, shall be accompanied by an aquifer recharge report pursuant to this article. (6) Mining and Quarrying. Mining and quarrying performance standards containing groundwater protection best management practices pertaining to operation, closure, and the operation of gravel screening, gravel crushing, cement concrete batch plants, and asphalt concrete batch plants, where allowed, are contained in Chapters 18.20 and 18.30 JCC. (7) Hazardous Materials. Land use activities that generate hazardous waste, which are not prohibited outright under this code, and which are conditionally exempt from regulation by the Washington Department of Ecology under WAC 173-303-100, or which use, store, or handle hazardous substances, shall be required to prepare and submit a hazardous materials management plan that demonstrates that the development will not have an adverse impact on groundwater quality. The facility owner must update the hazardous materials management plan annually. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 14 of 67 (8)8 Well Drilling, Building Land Division, and Buildin Permits in Seawater Intrusion Protection Zones. (a) Well Drilling. The Washington State Department of Ecology regulates well drilling pursuant to the Water Well Construction Act. Proposed wells, including those exempt from permitting requirements, must be sited at least 100 feet from "known or potential sources of contamination," which include "sea-salt water intrusion areas" (WAC 178-160-171), unless a variance is obtained from Ecology per WAC 173-160-106. (b) Subdivisions. Applications for land division (Chapter 18 5 JCC) must include specific and conclusive proof of adequate supplies of potable water through a qualifying hydrogeologic assessment (relevant components of an aquifer recharge area report per JCC 18.22.400) that demonstrates that the creation of new lots and corresponding use of water will not impact the subject aquifer such that water quality is degraded by seawater intrusion. (i) Marrowstone Island Subdivision Moratorium. Due to documented seawater intrusion on Marrowstone Island and the existence of undeveloped lots of record, Jefferson County has imposed a moratorium on additional land divisions on the island until such time as public water is available or it is demonstrated through the well monitoring program that groundwater quality is not degrading due to seawater intrusion. (c) Building Permits. (i) Evidence of potable water may be an individual well, connection to a public water system, or an alternative system. Whatever method is selected, the regulatory and operational standards for that method must be met, including Jefferson County health codes and the Washington Administrative Code. Pursuant to Section 4 of the State "Guidelines for Determining Water Availability for New Buildings" (Ecology Publication No. 93-27), investigation and identification of well interference problems and impairment to senior rights is the responsibility of the Washington Department of Ecology. If the possibility of a problem is suspected, the local permitting authority should contact Ecology. (ii) All types of building permits that require proof of potable water use are subject to this policy, specifically building permits for new single-family residences (SFRs) or other structures with plumbing that are not associated with an existing SFR (i.e., shops or garages with a bathroom). (d) Voluntary and mandatory measures of the Jefferson County seawater intrusion policy apply to development proposals within the coastal, at risk, and high risk SIPZ, and upon Marrowstone Island, in the following manner, in addition to all existing applicable health codes: (i) Coastal SIPZ. (A) Voluntary Actions. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 15 of 67 (I) Water conservation measures; (II) Ongoing well monitoring for chloride concentration; (III) Submittal of data to county. (B) Mandatory Actions. (I) For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available; (II) If public water is unavailable, an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirements: 1. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application; 2. Installation of source-totalizing meter (flow). (III) If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. (ii) At Risk SIPZ. (A) Voluntary Actions. (I) Water conservation measures. (B) Mandatory Actions. (I) For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available; (II) If public water is unavailable, an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirements: 1. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application; 2. Installation of a source-totalizing meter (flow); 3. Ongoing well monitoring for chloride concentration; 4. Submittal of flow and chloride data to the county per monitoring program; (III) If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. (iii) High Risk SIPZ. (A) Mandatory Actions. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 16 of 67 (I) Water conservation measures (per list maintained by UDC administrator); (II) For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available; (III) If public water is unavailable, an individual well may only be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirements: 1. Variance from WAC Title 173 standards granted by Ecology per WAC 173-160-106 for a new groundwater well within 100 feet of a sea -salt water intrusion area per WAC 173-160-171 (i.e., within 100 feet of a groundwater source showing chloride concentrations above 200 mg/L or within 100 feet of the marine shoreline); or for an existing groundwater well not subject to an Ecology variance, applicant must provide a hydrogeologic assessment (relevant components of an aquifer recharge area report per JCC 18.22.400), which shall be transmitted to Ecology for review, demonstrating that use of the well does not cause any detrimental interference with existing water rights and is not detrimental to the public interest; 2. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application; 3. If chloride concentration exceeds 250 mg/L in a water sample submitted for a building permit, then the property owner shall be required to record a restrictive covenant that indicates a chloride reading exceeded the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency secondary standard (250 mg/L) under the National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations; 4. Installation of a source-totalizing meter flow; 5. Ongoing well monitoring for chloride concentration; 6. Submittal of flow and chloride data to the county per monitoring program; (IV) If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. (iv) Marrowstone Island. In addition to all voluntary and mandatory actions associated with the applicable SIPZ as described above, the following measures apply to all development proposals on Marrowstone Island that include groundwater withdrawal: (A) Voluntary Actions. (I) Installation of timers together with new well pump installations to enable pump use limitation to low demand times. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 18 of 67 human health and safety, toget with effects on publi ac lities and servi , s, throug its protec n tandards. [Orcj,. 3-08 1] 18.22.1 0 Relationship to' other regulations. While he Jefferson County floodplain management ordinance r quires consisten y ith all o er applicable law in the event thata convict should existricter stand shall ap y to the regulatevelopment. [Ord. 3'68 § 1] Article V. Geologically Hazardous Areas 18.22.160 Classification/designation. (1) Classification. Geologically hazardous areas shall be classified based upon a combination of erosion, landslide and seismic hazard. (2) Designation. The following erosion, landslide, seismic, and channel migration zone (CMZ) hazard areas shall be subject to the standards of this article: (a) Erosion Hazard Areas. Areas containing soils or soil complexes described and mapped within the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey for Jefferson County as having a severe or very severe erosion hazard potential. (b) Landslide Hazard Areas. Areas potentially subject to mass movement due to a combination of geologic, topographic and hydrologic factors including: (i) Areas of historic failures or potentially unstable slopes, such as: (A) Areas described and mapped as having severe or very severe building limitations for dwellings without basements within the United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey for Jefferson County; (B) Areas described and mapped as recent or old landslides or slopes of unstable materials within the Washington State Department of Ecology Coastal Zone Atlas of Jefferson County; and (C) Areas described and mapped as areas of poor natural stability, former landslides and recent landslides by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Earth Resources; (ii) Areas potentially unstable as a result of rapid stream incision, stream bank erosion, or undercutting by wave action; and (iii) Areas with any indications of earth movement, such as: (A) Rockslides; (B) Earthflows; (C) Mudflows; and http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 19 of 67 (D) Landslides. (c) Seismic Hazard Areas. Areas subject to severe risk of damage as a result of earthquake-induced ground shaking, slope failure, settlement, soil liquefaction, or surface faulting. These areas are identified by the presence of: poorly drained soils with greater than 50 percent silt and very little coarse material; loose sand or gravel, peat, artificial fill and landslide materials; or soil units with high organic content. (d) Channel Migration Zones (CMZs). Areas subject to the natural movement of stream channel meanders. Those areas within the delineated high risk CMZ area (the area in which channel migration is likely to occur within the next 50 years) are subject to this article. Disconnected migration areas, which are areas that have been disconnected from the river by legally existing artificial structure(s) that restrain channel migration (such as levees and transportation facilities built above or constructed to remain intact through the 100-year flood elevation) and are no longer available for migration by the river, shall be excluded from review under this article. Moderately high, moderate, and low risk CMZs areas are also excluded from review under this article. (3) Sources Used for Identification. Sources used to identify geologically hazardous areas include, but are not limited to: (a) United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey for Jefferson County. (b) Washington State Department of Ecology, Coastal Zone Atlas. (c) Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Slope Stability and Geologic Maps of Eastern Jefferson County. (d) Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Geographic Information System: Soil Survey. (e) Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Geologic Maps of Eastern Jefferson County, Compressibility of Earth Materials in Eastern Jefferson County. (f) United States Department of the Interior, USGS Quad Maps. (g) U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, 2004, Channel Migration Zone Study for the Duckabush, Dosewallips, Big Quilcene and Little Quilcene Rivers, Jefferson County, Washington. Denver, CO. (h) Perkins Geosciences, 2006, Channel Migration Hazard Maps for the Dosewallips, Duckabush, Big Quilcene and Little Quilcene Rivers, Jefferson County, Washington. Seattle, WA. (i) Perkins Geosciences with TerraLogic GIS, June 2004, Lower Hoh River Channel Migration Study Summary Report. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 20 of 67 (j) The following rivers are not regulated in this section as a result of not having mapped CMZs (not an exhaustive list): Thorndyke Creek, Shine Creek, Chimacum Creek, Snow Creek, Salmon Creek, Upper Hoh River, Bogachiel River, Clearwater River, and Quinault River. (4) Geologic Hazard Area Maps. The maps prepared by the county using the identification sources listed in this section have been produced for informational purposes only and are not regulatory devices forming an integral part of this code. [Ord. 6-09 § 1 (Exh. B); Ord. 3-08 § 1) 18.22.170 Protection standards. (1) General. Application for a project on a parcel of real property containing a designated geologically hazardous area or its buffer shall adhere to the requirements set forth below. (2) Drainage and Erosion Control. (a) An applicant submitting a project application shall also submit, and have approved, a drainage and erosion control plan, as specified in this chapter, when the project application involves either of the following: (i) The alteration of a geologically hazardous area or its buffer; or (ii) The creation of a new parcel within a known geologically hazardous area. (b) Drainage and erosion control plans required under this chapter shall discuss, evaluate and recommend methods to minimize sedimentation of adjacent properties during and after construction. (c) Surface drainage shall not be directed across the face of a marine bluff, landslide hazard or ravine. The applicant must demonstrate that the stormwater discharge cannot be accommodated on site or upland by evidence of a geotechnical report, unless waived by the administrator. If drainage must be discharged from a bluff to adjacent waters, it shall be collected above the face of the bluff and directed to the water by tight line drain and provided with an energy dissipating device at the shoreline, above OHWM. (d) In addition to any erosion control methods specified in the drainage and erosion control plan, the administrator may require hydroseeding of exposed or disturbed areas or other BMPs. (3) Clearing and Grading. (a) In addition to the general clearing and grading provisions in Chapter 18.30 JCC, the following provisions shall also apply: (i) Clearing within geologically hazardous areas shall be allowed only from April 1st to November 1st, unless the applicant demonstrates that such activities would not result in impacts contrary to the protection requirements herein; http://www.codepubl ishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 21 of 67 (ii) Only that clearing necessary to install temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures shall occur prior to clearing for roadways or utilities; (iii) Clearing limits for roads, septic, water and stormwater utilities, and temporary erosion control facilities shall be marked in the field and approved by the administrator prior to any alteration of existing native vegetation; (iv) Clearing for roads and utilities shall remain within construction limits which must be marked in the field prior to commencement of site work; and (v) The authorized clearing for roads and utilities shall be the minimum necessary to accomplish project specific engineering designs and shall remain within approved rights-of-way. (b) The following provisions regarding grading shall apply: (i) An applicant submitting a project application shall also submit, and have approved, a grading plan, as specified in this chapter, when the application involves either of the following: (A) The alteration of a geologically hazardous area or its buffer; or (B) The creation of a new parcel within a known geologically hazardous area. (ii) Excavation, grading and earthwork construction regulated under this section shall only be allowed from April 1st to November 1st, unless the applicant demonstrates that such activities would not result in impacts contrary to the protection requirements herein. (4) Vegetation Retention. The following provisions regarding vegetation retention shall apply: (a) During clearing for roadways and utilities, all trees and understory lying outside of approved construction limits shall be retained; provided, that understory damaged during approved clearing operations may be pruned. (b) Damage to vegetation retained during initial clearing activities shall be minimized by directional felling of trees to avoid critical areas and vegetation to be retained. (c) Retained trees, understory and stumps may subsequently be cleared only if such clearing is necessary to complete the proposal involved in the triggering application. (d) Within a high risk CMZ, vegetation removal shall not be allowed. Vegetation removal outside of a high risk CMZ shall not be reviewed under this article. Should this provision conflict with other vegetation retention requirements specified within the JCC, the more restrictive protection requirement applies. (5) Buffer Marking. The location of the outer extent of landslide hazard area buffers shall be marked in the field as follows: http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 22 of 67 (a) A permanent physical separation along the boundary of the landslide hazard area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation may consist of logs, a tree or hedgerow, fencing, or other prominent physical marking approved by the administrator. (b) Buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every 100 feet, whichever is less. Signs shall remain in place prior to and during approved construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Landslide Hazard Area & Buffer— Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Native Vegetation." (c) In the case of short plat, long plat, binding site plan or site plan approvals under this code, the applicant shall include on the face of any such instrument the boundary of the landslide hazard area and its buffer. (6) Buffers — Standard Requirements. The following landslide hazard area buffer provisions shall apply: (a) Buffer areas shall be required to provide sufficient separation between the landslide hazard area and the adjacent proposed project. (b) The appropriate width of the landslide hazard area buffer shall be determined by either: application of the standard buffer width set forth below; or by acceptance of a geotechnical report meeting the criteria of this section. (c) Buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Where buffer disturbance has occurred during construction, replanting with native vegetation shall be required. (d) Buffers shall be retained in their natural condition; however, minor pruning of vegetation to enhance views may be permitted by the administrator on a case-by- case basis. (e) All buffers shall be measured perpendicularly from the top, toe or edge of the landslide hazard area boundary. (f) A standard buffer of 30 feet shall be established from the top, toe and all edges of landslide hazard areas. (g) A building setback line is required to be five feet from the edge of any buffer area for a landslide hazard area or to outside the full extent of the high risk channel migration zone (CMZ), whichever is greater. (7) Reducing Buffer Widths. The administrator may reduce the standard landslide hazard area buffer width only when the project applicant demonstrates, to the satisfaction of the administrator, that the project cannot meet the required setback. The reduced buffer must adequately protect the proposed project from the risks of the landslide hazard area to the maximum extent possible. Under no circumstances shall the buffer width be reduced to less than 15 feet. http://www.codepublishmg.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/J effersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 23 of 67 (8) Increasing Buffer Widths. The administrator may increase the standard landslide hazard area buffer width when a larger buffer is necessary to protect the proposed project and the landslide hazard area. This determination shall be made when the administrator demonstrates any one of the following through appropriate documentation: (a) The landslide area is unstable and active. (b) The adjacent land is susceptible to severe landslide or erosion, and erosion control measures will not effectively protect the proposed project from the risks posed by the landslide hazard area. (c) The adjacent land has minimal vegetative cover. (9) Geotechnical Report. (a) An applicant submitting a project application shall submit, and have approved, a geotechnical report, as specified in Article VIII of this chapter, when the application involves any of the following: (i) The alteration of a landslide hazard area or its buffer. (ii) The creation of a new parcel within a known landslide hazard area. (iii) The construction of a publicly owned facility in a designated seismic hazard area. (b) Where a geotechnical report is required for a landslide hazard area, the project application shall not be approved unless the geotechnical report certifies all of the following: (i) There is minimal landslide hazard as proven by a lack of evidence of landslide activity in the vicinity in the past; (ii) An analysis of slope stability indicates that the proposal will not be subject to risk of landslide, or the proposal or the landslide hazard area can be modified so that hazards are eliminated; (iii) The proposal will not increase surface water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent properties beyond predevelopment conditions; (iv) The proposal will not decrease slope stability on adjacent properties; and (v) All newly created building sites will be stable under normal geologic and hydrogeologic conditions (if applicable). (c) Where a geotechnical report is required for a seismic hazard area, the project application shall not be approved unless the geotechnical report demonstrates that the proposed project will adequately protect the public safety. [Ord. 6-09 § 1 (Exh. B); Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.180 Conditions. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 24 of 67 (1) General. In granting approval for a project application subject to the provisions of this article, the administrator may require mitigating conditions that will, in the administrator's judgment, substantially secure the objectives of this article. (2) Basis for Conditions. All conditions of approval required pursuant to this section shall be based upon either the substantive requirements of this section or the recommendations of a qualified professional, contained within a special report required under this chapter. [Ord. 6-09 § 1 (Exh. B); Ord. 3-08 § 1] Article VI. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (FWHCAs) 18.22.195 Compliance alternatives. Article VI sets forth the prescriptive requirements. Applicants for development permits or approvals subject to this article may elect to comply with the critical area stewardship plan (CASP) provisions set forth in Article IX of this chapter in lieu of the prescriptive requirements set forth herein. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.200 Classification/designation. (1) Classification. Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas (FWHCAs) are those areas identified as being of critical importance to the maintenance of endangered, threatened, or sensitive species of fish, wildlife and/or plants, or species of local importance. These areas are typically identified either by known point locations of specific species (such as a nest or den) or by habitat areas or both. All areas within the county meeting these criteria are hereby designated critical areas and are subject to the provisions of this article. (2) Mapping. The approximate location and extent of identified fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas (FWHCAs) are shown on the county's critical area maps. These maps are to be used as a guide and do not provide a definitive critical area determination. The county shall update the maps as new FWHCAs are identified or new information related to updates to existing maps becomes available. (3) Designation. The following are designated as fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas (FWHCAs): (a) Areas with which endangered, threatened, and sensitive species listed by the federal or state government have a primary association. (i) Federally designated and threatened species are those fish and wildlife species identified by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service that are in danger of extinction or threatened to become endangered. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Services should be consulted for current listing status. (ii) State endangered, threatened, and sensitive species are those species native to the state of Washington identified by the State Department of Fish and Wildlife that are in danger of extinction, threatened to become endangered, vulnerable, or declining and are likely to become endangered within the state. The state maintains the list of these species in WAC 232-12-014 (endangered http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 25 of 67 species) and in WAC 232-12-014 (threatened and sensitive species). The State Department of Fish and Wildlife should be consulted for current listing status. (b) Rivers and streams not otherwise protected under Washington State Forest Practices regulations (Chapter 76.09 RCW and WAC Title 222) that have FWHCAs are protected according to stream type. (c) Lands covered under the Forest Practices Act. Forested areas in Jefferson County provide protection as FWHCAs under the Forest Practices Act (Chapter 76.09 RCW) and forest practices regulations (WAC Title 222). (d) Commercial and recreational shellfish areas, including designated shellfish habitat conservation areas (note: shellfish aquaculture activities within all public and private tidelands and bed lands suitable for shellfish harvest are allowed uses; such activities include but are not limited to bed marking, preparation, planting, cultivation, and harvest). (e) Kelp and eelgrass beds. (f) Surf smelt, Pacific herring, and Pacific sand lance spawning areas. (g) Natural area preserves and natural resource conservation areas. (h) All areas designated by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) through the Washington Natural Heritage Program as high quality wetland ecosystems and high quality terrestrial ecosystems. (i) Species and habitats of local importance established pursuant to the process delineated in JCC 18.22.210. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.210 Process and requirements for designating habitats of local importance as critical areas. (1) Purpose. This section describes the process for designating species and habitats of local importance that are not covered by the federal and state sensitive, threatened or endangered species regulations. Accordingly, this section details the requirements for designating and monitoring species and habitats of local importance, as well as removing such species and habitats from designation if necessary. (2) Definition. The use of the term "habitat" in this section includes areas designated as "wildlife corridors." (3) Procedure for Designation — Generally. An application/nomination to designate a habitat of local importance as a critical area shall be processed according to the procedures for Type V land use decisions established in Chapter 18.40 JCC. (4) Nominations/Applications. Any person, organization, or Jefferson County agency may nominate and apply for designation a species or habitat of local importance. A nominating person or organization must be a resident of, or headquartered in, Jefferson County. (5) Nomination/Application Submittal. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 26 of 67 (a) The applicant shall provide information demonstrating that the species or habitat is native to Jefferson County, existing on or before the date of adoption of the regulations codified in this chapter. (b) All nominations/applications for designation of a species/habitat of local significance shall include the following: (i) Identification of the species including its scientific and locally common name (s); (ii) Identification of the geographic location, including Jefferson County parcel numbers, and extent of the habitat associated with a nominated species or the nominated habitat itself if not associated with a nominated species; a map of an appropriate scale to properly describe the location and extent of the habitat will accompany the nomination, as well as geo-referencing information sufficient to allow mapping of the habitat site in the county GIS mapping system; (iii) The status of the species or the occurrence of the type of habitat in surrounding counties and in the rest of the state has been considered in making this nomination; (iv) A management strategy for the species or habitat; (v) Indications as to whether the proposed management strategy has been peer reviewed, and if so, how this was done and by whom; (vi) Where restoration of habitat is proposed, a specific plan, including how the restoration will be funded, must be provided as part of the nomination; (vii) Recommendations for allowed, exempt, and regulated activities within the area; (viii) Recommended buffer and setback requirements and their justification; (ix) Seasonal requirements; (x) A monitoring plan must be practical and achievable and include the following: (A) Baseline data and a description of what measurements will be used to determine the success of the project. The plan shall include the criteria and time period required to evaluate the success of the plan; (B) A contingency plan for failure; (C) A list of all parcels not included in the nomination but affected by the monitoring process; (xi) The nomination must also include an economic impact, cost and benefits analysis. The nomination must also include an analysis of alternative solutions http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 27 of 67 to formal designation of the habitat of local importance as a regulated critical area under this chapter. (c) The applicant shall be responsible for paying all fees and all expenses incurred by Jefferson County to process the application. (6) Review and Approval Criteria. (a) Species nominated for designation under this section must satisfy the following criteria: (i) Local populations that are in danger of extirpation based on documented trends since the adoption of the Growth Management Act; (ii) The species is sensitive to habitat manipulation; (iii) The species or habitat has commercial, game, or other special value such as locally rare species; (iv) The nomination includes an analysis of the proposal using best available science; and (v) The nomination specifies why protection by other county, state or federal policies, laws, regulations or nonregulatory tools is inadequate to prevent degradation of the species or habitat and for which management strategies are practicable, and describes why, without designation and protection, there is a likelihood that the species will not maintain and reproduce over the long term, or that a unique habitat will be lost. (b) Habitats nominated for designation under this section must satisfy the following criteria: (i) Where a habitat is nominated to protect a species, the use of the habitat by that species must be documented or be highly likely or the habitat is proposed to be restored with the consent of the affected property owner so that it will be suitable for use by the species; and, long-term persistence of the species in Jefferson County and adjoining counties is dependent on the protection, maintenance or restoration of the habitat; (ii) Areas nominated to protect a particular habitat must represent either high quality native habitat or habitat that has an excellent potential to recover to a high quality condition and which is either of limited availability or highly vulnerable to alteration; (iii) The nomination specifies the specific habitat features to be protected (e.g., nest sites, breeding areas, nurseries, etc.). In the case of proposed wildlife corridors, the nomination shall specify those features that are required for the corridor to remain viable to support and protect the nominated species. (7) Review and Approval Process. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 28 of 67 (a) The department of community development shall determine whether the application submittal is complete. If deemed complete, the department shall evaluate the proposal for compliance with the approval criteria set forth in this section and make a recommendation to the planning commission based on those criteria. The department shall also notify all parcel owners affected of the terms and contents of the proposal. (b) Upon receipt of a staff report and recommendation from the department, the planning commission shall hold a public hearing, and make a recommendation to the board of commissioners based upon the approval criteria set forth in this section. (c) The Jefferson County board of commissioners shall consider the recommendation transmitted by the planning commission at a regularly scheduled public meeting, and may then adopt an ordinance formally approving the designation. Should the board wish to vary from the planning commission recommendation and alter or reject the application, such action may only occur following a separate public hearing conducted by the board. (d) Upon approval, the ordinance designating and regulating the species or habitat of local importance shall be codified in this article for public information and implementation by the department, and a notice to title shall be placed upon all parcels affected by the designation. (e) Each ordinance creating a species or habitat of local importance shall include periodic review or reassessment of the initial designation. The length of the periodic review may be dependent on the characteristics of the species or habitat. (8) Removal from Designation. Species or habitats of local significance may be removed at any time; provided, that they no longer meet the criteria set forth in subsection (5) of this section (e.g., as a result of a natural catastrophe or climatic change event); and provided further, that the procedural requirements of this section and the procedural requirements established for Type V land use decisions set forth within Chapter 18.40 JCC are met. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.220 Sources used for identification. Sources used to identify fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas (FWHCAs) include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory. (2) Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Water Type Index Maps. (3) Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife, Non-Game and Priority Habitats and Species databases. (4) Public and private tidelands or bedlands suitable for shellfish harvest and identified by the Washington Department of Health's classification system and shellfish protection districts established pursuant to Chapter 90.72 RCW. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 29 of 67 (5) Kelp and eelgrass beds may be classified and identified with the Department of Natural Resources Aquatic Lands Program and the Department of Ecology (note: many locations are compiled in the Puget Sound Environmental Atlas). (6) Herring and smelt spawning times and locations are outlined in WAC 220-110-240 through 220-110-250, Hydraulic Code Rules, Technical Report No. 79, and the Puget Sound Environmental Atlas. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.230 Fish and wildlife habitat conservation area (FWHCA) maps. County maps identifying FWHCAs have been produced for informational purposes only and are not regulatory devices forming an integral part of this article. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.250 Regulated activities. Any land use or development activity that is subject to a development permit or approval requirements of this code shall be subject to the provisions of this article. These include, but are not limited to, the following activities that are directly undertaken or originate in a FWHCA or its buffer, unless otherwise exempted under JCC 18.22.070: (1) Stream Crossings. Any private or public road expansion or construction which is proposed and must cross streams classified within this article shall comply with the following minimum development standards: (a) The design of stream crossings shall meet the requirements of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Fish passage shall be provided if necessary to address manmade obstructions on-site. Other alternatives may be allowed upon a showing that, for the site under review, the alternatives would be less disruptive to the habitat or that the necessary building foundations were not feasible. Submittal of a habitat management plan which demonstrates that the alternatives would not result in significant impacts to the fish and wildlife habitat area (FWHCA) may be required; (b) Crossings shall not occur in salmonid spawning areas unless no other reasonable crossing site exists. For new development proposals, if existing crossings are determined to adversely impact salmon spawning or passage areas, new or upgraded crossings shall be located as determined necessary through coordination with the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife; (c) Bridge piers or abutments shall not be placed either within the floodway or between the ordinary, high water marks unless no other reasonable alternative placement exists; (d) All stream crossings shall be designed based on the 100-year projected flood flows, even in non-fish bearing Type Np and Ns streams. In addition, crossings for Type S and F streams should allow for downstream transport of large woody debris; (e) Crossings shall serve multiple properties whenever possible; and (f) Where there is no reasonable alternative to providing a culvert, the culvert shall be the minimum length necessary to accommodate the permitted activity. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 30 of 67 (2) Utilities. Placement of utilities within designated fish and wildlife habitat areas may be allowed pursuant to the following standards: (a) Construction of utilities may be permitted in FWHCAs or their buffers only when no practicable or reasonable alternative location is available and the utility corridor meets the requirements for installation, replacement of vegetation and maintenance outlined below. Utilities are encouraged to follow existing or permitted roads where possible. (b) Construction of sewer lines or on-site sewage systems are not permitted in FWHCAs or their buffers, except that they may be permitted in a buffer area when the applicant demonstrates it is necessary to meet state and/or local health code requirements; there are no other practicable alternatives available; and construction meets the requirements of this article. Joint use of the sewer utility corridor by other utilities may be allowed. (c) New utility corridors shall not be allowed in FWHCAs with known locations of federal or state-listed endangered, threatened or sensitive species, except in those circumstances where an approved habitat management plan is in place. (d) Utility corridor construction and maintenance shall protect the environment of fish and wildlife habitat areas and their buffers. (i) New utility corridors shall be aligned when possible to avoid cutting trees greater than 12 inches in diameter at breast height (four and one-half feet) measured on the uphill side. (ii) New utility corridors shall be revegetated with appropriate native vegetation at not less than preconstruction vegetation densities or greater, immediately upon completion of construction or as soon thereafter as possible due to seasonal growing constraints. The utility shall ensure that such vegetation survives for a three-year period. (e) Utility towers should be painted with brush, pad or roller and should not be sandblasted or spray-painted, nor shall lead-based paints be used. (3) Bank Stabilization. (a) A stream channel and bank, bluff, and shoreline may be stabilized when naturally occurring earth movement threatens existing legal structures (structure is defined for this purpose as those requiring a building permit pursuant to the building code), public improvements, unique natural resources, public health, safety or welfare, or the only feasible access to property, and, in the case of streams, when such stabilization results in maintenance of fish habitat or improved water quality, as demonstrated through a habitat management plan or equivalent study or assessment. Bluff, bank and shoreline stabilization shall follow the standards of the Jefferson County shoreline master program, geologically hazardous areas provision in this chapter, and the floodplain management ordinance (Chapter 15.15 JCC). http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 31 of 67 (b) The administrator shall require that bank stabilization be designed by a professional engineer licensed in the state of Washington with demonstrated expertise in hydraulic actions of shorelines. For bank stabilization projects within FWHCAs, the applicant must provide a geotechnical report that demonstrates that bioengineering solutions (vegetation versus hard surfaces) are infeasible. The report must document the engineering rationale why bioengineering solutions are infeasible in a manner that can be confirmed through review by other engineering professionals. Bank stabilization projects may also require a hydraulic project approval from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife that will be determined after consultation with WDFW. (4) Gravel Mining. Gravel mining is discouraged within FWHCAs or their buffers, and it shall not be permitted if it causes unmitigatable significant adverse impacts, but it may be allowed following the review and approval of a habitat management plan, including a detailed mining and reclamation plan pursuant to the applicable performance standards in JCC 18.20.240 or as otherwise required in this code. (5) Forest Practices, Class IV General. Timber harvesting with associated development activity involving land conversions from forest use, or otherwise meeting the DNR definition as a Class IV General application, shall comply with the provisions of this article, including the maintenance of buffers, where required. (6) Road/Street Repair and Construction. Any private or public road or street expansion or construction which is allowed in a FWHCA or its buffer shall comply with the following minimum development standards: (a) No other reasonable or practicable alternative exists and the proposed road or street serves multiple properties whenever possible; (b) Public and private roads are encouraged to provide for other purposes, such as utility crossings, pedestrian or bicycle easements, viewing points, etc.; (c) The road or street construction is the minimum necessary, as required by the department of public works' guidelines. Minimum necessary provisions may include projected level of service requirements; and (d) Construction time limits shall be determined in consultation with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife in order to ensure species and habitat protection. (7) Outdoor Recreation, Education and Trails. Activities and improvements that do not significantly affect the function of the FWHCA or regulated buffer (including viewing structures, outdoor scientific or interpretive facilities, trails, hunting blinds, etc.) may be permitted in FWHCAs or their buffers. (a) Trails and other facilities shall, to the extent feasible, be placed on existing road grades, utility corridors, or other previously disturbed areas; (b) Trails and other facilities shall be planned to minimize removal of trees, shrubs, snags and important wildlife habitat; http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRThICAL AREAS Page 32 of 67 (c) Viewing platforms, interpretive centers, benches and access to them, shall be designed and located to minimize impacts to wildlife, fish, or their habitat and/or critical characteristics of the affected FWHCA; (d) Trails, in general, shall be set back from streams so that there will be minimal impact to the stream from trail use or maintenance. Trails shall be constructed with pervious surfaces when feasible and trails within FWHCAs are not intended to be used by motorized vehicles. (8) Chemical Application or Storage. Chemical applications are not permitted within FWHCAs unless expressly approved as part of a farm plan, forest practices application, or for the control of invasive or noxious plant species. In cases where approved chemical applications occur as part of a forest practices application or farm plan, proper reporting procedures shall be followed. Chemical storage shall not be permitted within a FWHCA or its buffer. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.265 Habitat management plans —When required. When a development proposal is located on lands which may contain a habitat for a protected species other than bald eagle nesting territories, or when the applicant proposes to alter, decrease or average the standard buffer, a habitat management plan (HMP) shall be required, consistent with the requirements of JCC 18.22.440. [Ord. 3-08 § 11 18.22.270 Protection standards. (1) General. Application for a project on a parcel of real property containing a designated FWHCA or its buffer shall adhere to the requirements set forth in this section. (2) Drainage and Erosion Control. An applicant submitting a project application shall also submit, and have approved, a drainage and erosion control plan, as specified in this chapter. (3) Grading. An applicant submitting a project application shall also submit, and have approved, a grading plan, as specified in this chapter. (4) Vegetation Retention. The following provisions regarding vegetation retention shall apply: (a) All trees and understory lying outside of road rights-of-way and utility easements shall be retained (except for hazard trees) during clearing for roadways and utilities; provided, that understory damaged during approved clearing operations may be pruned. (b) Damage to vegetation retained during initial clearing activities shall be minimized by directional felling of trees to avoid critical areas and vegetation to be retained. (c) Retained trees, understory and stumps may subsequently be cleared only if such clearing is necessary to complete the proposal involved in the project application. (5) Buffers — Standard Requirements. The administrator shall have the authority to require buffers from the edges of all FWHCAs in accordance with the following: http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 33 of 67 (a) Buffers Generally. (i) Buffers shall be established for activities adjacent to FWHCAs as necessary to protect the integrity, functions and values of the resource, consistent with the requirements set forth in Tables 18.22.270(1) and 18.22.270(2) of this section. (ii) A building setback line of five feet is required from the edge of any buffer area; however, nonstructural improvements such as septic drain fields may be located within setback areas. (iii) Buffers shall be retained in their natural condition; however, minor pruning of vegetation to enhance views or provide access may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished. (iv) Lighting shall be directed away from the FWHCA. (b) Prescriptive FWHCA Buffers. (i) The standard buffer widths required by this article are considered to be the minimum required to protect the stream functions and values at the time of the proposed activity. When a buffer lacks adequate vegetation to protect critical area functions, the administrator may deny a proposal for buffer reduction or buffer averaging. (ii) The standard buffer shall be measured landward horizontally on both sides of the stream from the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) as identified in the field. Nevertheless, the required buffer shall include any adjacent regulated wetland(s), landslide hazard areas and/or erosion hazard areas and required buffers, but shall not be extended across paved roads or other lawfully established structures or hardened surfaces. The following standard buffer width requirements are established; provided, that portions of streams that flow underground may be exempt from these buffer standards at the administrator's discretion when it can be demonstrated that no adverse effects on aquatic species will occur. Table 18.22.270(1): Stream Buffers* Stream Type Buffer Requirement Type "S" — Shoreline 150 feet Streams Type "F" — Fish 150 feet Bearing Streams Type "Np"— Non-Fish 75 feet Bearing Perennial Streams http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 34 of 67 Stream Type Buffer Requirement Type "Ns" — Non- 75 feet Fish Bearing Seasonal Streams greater than or equal 0 to 20% grade Type "Ns" — Non- 50 feet Fish Bearing Seasonal Streams less than 20% grade *Note: (a) The buffers set forth above shall apply to culverted streams; though in limited circumstances, a variance may be made in the application of stream buffers under Article IX of Chapter 18.40 JCC. (b) Stream type shall be determined using the criteria set forth in WAC 222-16-030. (iii) Buffers for Other FWHCAs. The administrator shall determine appropriate buffer widths for other FWHCAs based on the best available information. Buffer widths for nonstream habitat conservation areas shall be as follows: Table 18.22.270(2): Buffers for Other FWHCAs FWHCA Type Buffer Requirement Areas with Which Federally Listed Buffers shall be 150 feet; provided, that local and site Species Have a Primary Association specific factors shall be taken into consideration and the buffer width based on the best available information concerning the species/habitat(s) in question and/or the opinions and recommendations c a qualified professional with appropriate expertise. Commercial and Recreational Shellfish Buffers shall extend 150 feet landward from ordinary Areas high water mark of the marine shore. Kelp and Eelgrass Beds Buffers shall extend 150 feet landward from ordinary high water mark of the marine shore. Surf Smelt, Pacific Herring, and Pacific Buffers shall extend 150 feet landward from ordinary Sand Lance Spawning Areas high water mark of the marine shore. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 35 of 67 FWHCA Type Buffer Requirement Natural Ponds and Lakes Ponds under 20 acres — buffers shall extend 50 feet from the ordinary high water mark; Lakes 20 acres and larger— buffers shall extend 100 feet from the ordinary high water mark; provided, tha where vegetated wetlands are associated with the shoreline, the buffer shall be based on the wetland buffer requirements. Natural Area Preserves and Natural Buffers shall not be required adjacent to these areas. Resource Conservation Areas These areas are assumed to encompass the land required for species preservation. Locally Important Habitat Areas The buffer for marine nearshore habitats shall extenc landward 150 feet from the ordinary high water mark. The need for and dimensions of buffers for other locally important species or habitats shall be determined on a case-by-case basis, according to thi needs of the specific species or habitat area of concern. Buffers shall not be required adjacent to the wildlife corridor. The administrator shall coordinate with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife and other state, federal or tribal experts in these instances, and may use WDFW PHS management recommendations when available and applicable. (6) The administrator shall have the authority to reduce buffer widths on a case-by-case basis; provided, that the specific standards for avoidance and minimization set forth in JCC 18.22.350(1) shall apply, and when the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the administrator that all of the following criteria are met: (a) The buffer reduction shall not adversely affect the habitat functions and values of the adjacent FWHCA or other critical area. (b) The buffer shall not be reduced to less than 75 percent of the standard buffer. (c) The slopes adjacent to the FWHCA within the buffer area are stable and the gradient does not exceed 30 percent. (7) The administrator shall have the authority to average buffer widths on a case-by case basis; provided, that the specific standards for avoidance and minimization set forth in JCC 18.22.350(1) shall apply, and when the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the administrator that all the following criteria are met: (a) The total area contained in the buffer area after averaging is no less than that which would be contained within the standard buffer and all increases in buffer dimension are parallel to the FWHCA. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 36 of 67 (b) The buffer averaging does not reduce the functions or values of the FWHCA or riparian habitat, or the buffer averaging, in conjunction with vegetation enhancement, increases the habitat function. (c) The buffer averaging is necessary due to site constraints caused by existing physical characteristics such as slope, soils, or vegetation. (d) The buffer width is not reduced to less than 75 percent of the standard width. (e) The slopes adjacent to the FWHCA within the buffer area are stable and the gradient does not exceed 30 percent. (f) Buffer averaging shall not be allowed if FWHCA buffers are reduced pursuant to subsection (6) of this section. (8) Buffer Marking. The location of the outer extent of required buffers shall be marked in the field as follows: (a) During Construction. Buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every 100 feet, whichever is less. Signs shall remain in place prior to and during approved construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Buffer— Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Native Vegetation." (9) In the case of short plat, long plat, binding site plan, and site plan approvals under this code, the applicant shall include on the face of any such instrument the boundary of the FWHCA. (10) The applicant may also choose to dedicate the buffer through a conservation easement or deed restriction that shall be recorded with the Jefferson County auditor. Such easements or restrictions shall, however, use the forms approved by the prosecuting attorney. [Ord. 3-08 § 11 18.22.280 Conditions. (1) General. In granting approval for a project application subject to the provisions of this article, the administrator may require mitigating conditions that will, in the administrator's judgment, substantially secure the objectives of this article. (2) Basis for Conditions. All conditions of approval required pursuant to this article shall be based upon either the substantive requirements of this article or the recommendations of a qualified professional utilizing best available science, contained within a special report required under this chapter. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] Article VII. Wetlands 18.22.290 Stewardship alternative. Article VII sets forth the prescriptive requirements for wetlands. Applicants for development permits or approvals subject to this article may elect to comply with the critical area stewardship plan (GASP) provisions set forth in Article IX of this chapter in lieu of the prescriptive requirements set forth herein. CASP may be applied within http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 37 of 67 Category II, III, and IV wetlands and buffers, and within buffers in Category I. They cannot be used in Category I wetlands. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.300 Classification/designation. (1) Classification. Wetlands shall be classified using the 2004 Washington State Department of Ecology's Wetland Rating System for Western Washington (Ecology Publication No. 04-06-025), or as amended. Wetland rating categories shall not be determined based upon illegal modification of the land. Wetland delineations shall be determined by using the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual, March 1997, or as amended hereafter. (2) Designation. As determined using the 1997 Washington State Department of Ecology's Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Ecology Publication No. 96-94 or as amended), wetlands shall be designated as critical areas and regulated under this article regardless of size; provided, that Category IV wetlands less than one-tenth acre (4,356 square feet) shall be exempt from the requirements of this article when all of the following criteria are met: (a) The wetland does not provide breeding habitat for native amphibian species. Breeding habitat is indicated by adequate and stable seasonal inundation, presence of thin-stemmed emergent vegetation, and clean water; (b) The wetland does not have unique characteristics that would be difficult to replace through standard compensatory mitigation practices; (c) The wetland is not located within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area (FWHCA) as defined in the section of this chapter dealing with FWHCAs, and is not integral to the maintenance of habitat functions of an FWHCA; (d) The wetland is not located within a floodplain; (e) The wetland is not associated with a shoreline of the state as defined by the county's shoreline master program; (f) The wetland is not part of a mosaic of wetlands and uplands, as determined using the guidance provided in the wetland rating system. (3) Sources Used for Identification. The following sources should be used to identify potential wetland locations. Sources include, but are not limited to: (a) United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory. (b) United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of Jefferson County Areas, Washington. (c) United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Hydric Soils List, Jefferson County Area. http://www.codepubl ishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 38 of 67 (d) County critical areas mapping. The wetland maps prepared by the county have been produced for informational purposes only and are not regulatory devices forming an integral part of this article. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.310 Regulated activities. Any land use or development activity shall be subject to the provisions of this Article VII, including, but not limited to, the following activities that are directly undertaken or originate in a regulated wetland or its buffer, unless exempted under JCC 18.22.070: (1) The removal, excavation, grading, or dredging of material of any kind, including the construction of ponds and trails; (2) The dumping or discharging of any material, or placement of any fill; (3) The draining, flooding, or disturbing of the wetland water level or water table; (4) The driving of pilings; (5) The placing of obstructions; (6) The construction, reconstruction, demolition, or expansion of any structure; (7) The destruction or alteration of wetland vegetation through clearing, harvesting, shading, intentional burning, application of herbicides or pesticides, or planting of vegetation that would alter the character of a regulated wetland; provided, that these activities are not part of a forest practice governed under Chapter 76.09 RCW (Forest Practices Act) and its rules; (8) Activities that result in: (a) A significant change of water temperature; (b) A significant change of physical or chemical characteristics of wetlands water sources, including quantity; or (c) The introduction of pollutants; or (9) Wetland Buffers. In addition to those activities allowed in regulated wetlands in this article, the following activities are allowed within wetland buffers without having to meet the protection standards or requirements for wetland studies or mitigation, set forth in this article; provided, that impacts to buffers are minimized and that disturbed areas are immediately restored except as specifically allowed in JCC 18.22.070. (a) Activities having minimal adverse impacts on buffers and no adverse impacts on regulated wetlands. These include low intensity, passive recreational activities, such as pervious trails, nonpermanent wildlife watching blinds, scientific or educational activities, and sports fishing or hunting. Trails within buffers shall be designed to minimize impacts to the wetland, and shall not include any impervious surfaces. (b) Within the buffers of Category III and IV wetlands only, vegetation-lined swales designed for stormwater management or conveyance when topographic restraints http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 39 of 67 determine there are no other upland alternative locations. Swales used for detention purposes may only be placed in the outer 25 percent of the buffer. Conveyance swales may be placed through the buffer, if necessary. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.330 Protection standards. (1) General. Application for a project on a parcel of real property containing a designated wetland or its buffer shall adhere to the requirements set forth below. (2) Delineation. An applicant submitting a project application shall also submit, and have approved, a wetland delineation report as specified in JCC 18.22.450. Additionally, the following provisions shall apply: (a) The location of the wetland and its boundary shall be determined through the performance of a field investigation utilizing the methodology contained in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual, March 1997, or as amended hereafter. (b) If the wetland is located off of the property involved in the project application and is inaccessible, the best available information shall be used to determine the wetland boundary and category. (c) The wetland boundary shall be staked or flagged in the field. (d) This requirement may be waived under the following circumstances: (i) Single-Family Residences. The requirement for a wetland delineation and special report may be waived by the administrator for construction of a single- family residence on an existing lot of record if DCD staff or a qualified wetland evaluator determines that: (A) Sufficient information exists for staff to estimate the boundaries of a wetland without a delineation; and (B) The single-family residence and all accessory structures and uses are not proposed to be located within the distances identified in Table 18.22.330(1) from the estimated wetland boundary. "Qualified wetland evaluator" means an individual recognized and acceptable to the administrator in using the most current edition of the Department of Ecology's Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington (2004), Ecology Publication No. 04-06-025, or as amended, in categorizing and rating wetlands. (ii) Subdivisions and Short Subdivisions. The requirement for a wetland delineation and special report will be waived for subdivisions and short subdivisions of an existing lot of record if a site assessment made by a qualified wetland evaluator indicates the following: (A) Sufficient information exists to estimate the boundaries of a wetland without a delineation; and http://www.cod epubli shing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 40 of 67 (B) Building envelopes or building setback lines are not proposed to be located within the distances identified in Tables 18.22.330(1), (2) and (3) from the estimated wetland boundary. (3) Wetland Buffer Requirements. Wetland buffer widths shall be prescribed and established based upon the category of the wetland, the wetland rating scores and the impact level of the proposed land use. The resulting buffers are shown in Tables 18.22.330(1), (2), and (3) (for low, moderate and high impact land uses). (a) The category and rating scores of a wetland shall be determined by a qualified wetland evaluator who must be recognized and acceptable to the administrator and use the most current edition of the Department of Ecology's "Wetlands in Washington State Volume 2: Guidance for Protecting and Managing Wetlands" (DOE Publication No. 05-06-0008) in categorizing and rating wetlands. (b) There are three land use impact level types. Each type is presented with the table containing the buffer widths that would be prescribed for its associated wetland category. (c) Proposals for development will have three options for deciding what their buffer distance will be. A buffer distance is the closest distance the proposed development can be to the wetland boundary. (i) The stewardship plan option, as detailed in Article IX of this chapter. (ii) The Professionally Delineated Boundary Option. A prescriptive buffer distance based on an actual delineation of the wetland boundary as determined by a qualified wetland evaluator (cost is the responsibility of proponent). This buffer distance will be measured outward from the delineated wetland boundary. Refer to the column in the tables with the word "delineation" in the heading. (iii) The Apparent Boundary Option. A prescriptive buffer distance based on the apparent location of the wetland boundary as proposed by the county's wetland specialist. In these cases the buffer will be the total distance calculated using the buffer distance as shown in the "delineation" column of the tables plus an additional 20 to 50 feet, depending upon wetland category (shown in the "nondelineation" column of the table). This calculated buffer distance will be measured outward from the apparent wetland boundary. (4) Drainage and Erosion Control. An applicant submitting a project application shall also submit, and have approved, a drainage and erosion control plan as specified in this chapter. The plan shall discuss, evaluate and recommend methods to minimize sedimentation of designated wetlands during and after construction. (5) Buffer Marking. Upon approval of the delineation report, the location of the outer extent of the wetland buffer shall be marked in the field as follows: (a) A permanent physical indicator along the upland boundary of the wetland buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. http://www.c odepubl ishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 41 of 67 (b) During construction activities, buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every 100 feet, whichever is less. Signs shall remain in place prior to and during approved construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Wetland & Buffer— Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Native Vegetation." (c) In the case of short plat, long plat, binding site plan, and site plan approvals under this code, the applicant shall include on the face of any such instrument the boundary of the wetland and its buffer. (d) The applicant may also choose to dedicate the buffer through a conservation easement or deed restriction that shall be recorded with the Jefferson County auditor. Such easements or restrictions shall, however, use the forms approved by the prosecuting attorney. (6) Buffers — Standard Requirements. (a) The administrator shall have the authority to require buffers from the boundaries of all wetlands as established by this article, and in accordance with the following criteria. (i) Wetland buffer widths shall be measured along a horizontal line perpendicular to the wetland boundary as marked in the field during delineation if required, or based upon site investigation, aerial photographs, or LiDAR images. (ii) Functionally isolated buffer areas are those areas separated from a wetland that do not protect the wetland from adverse impacts. Buffers need not include areas that are functionally isolated and physically disconnected from the wetland by a substantial developed surface such as a dike, building, parking lot, or road. In determining whether or not a buffer area is functionally isolated, the administrator shall take into consideration whether or not the isolated buffer area is used by wildlife to gain access to the wetland. In instances where substantial wildlife use is documented, the area shall be retained as buffer despite being otherwise isolated or disconnected from the wetland. (iii) When a buffer is on a slope steeper than 40 percent, and/or lacks adequately dense and diverse vegetation, the administrator may deny a proposal for buffer reduction or buffer averaging. (b) The prescribed buffer widths shall be established on the basis of the following factors: (i) The wetland's value and sensitivity to disturbance, based on its category (I, II, Ill, IV) as determined by the total score on the rating form for the wetland rating system; (ii) The expected level of impact of the proposed adjacent land use, as determined from Tables 18.22.330(1), (2), and (3). The administrator may determine, on the basis of detailed information from the applicant about the site http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 42 of 67 conditions, scope, and intensity of the proposed development, that the proposed land use will have a lesser level of impact on the wetland than indicated by similar land uses on the list. Table 18.22.330(1) WETLAND CATEGORIES, RATING SCORES AND BUFFER WIDTHS FOR LOW IMPACT LAND USES Low impact land uses shall include the following: • Private driveways serving no more than two residential parcels; • Unpaved trails (when not exempted by JCC 18.22.070); • Utility corridors (private or public) without a maintenance road; • Landscaping, lawns, gravel driveways, etc. + An Additional Wetland Characteristics Buffer Width with Distance from al an Identified Wetland Category • Habitat(H) Wetland Boundary Apparent Wetlan • Water Quality (WQ) (Delineated) Boundary (Not Delineated) IV [Total of scores less than 30 25 feet +20 feet (Total of scores for all points] functions is less than 30 points) III [With H score 20 — 28 75 feet +30 feet (Total of scores for all points] 40 feet functions is 30 — 50 [Not meeting above points) characteristic] II [WQ score 24 — 32 points 50 feet +40 feet (Total of scores for all and H score less than 20 150 feet functions is 51 —69 points] 75 feet points [H score 29 — 36 points] 75 feet or having "special [H score 20 — 28 points] 75 feet characteristics" [Estuarine] 50 feet identified [Interdunal] in the rating form) [Not meeting above characteristics] http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 43 of 67 [WQ score 24 — 32 points 50 feet +50 feet (Total of scores for all and H score less than 20 150 feet functions is more than points] 75 feet 70 points or having [H score 29 — 36 points] 100 feet "special characteristics" [H score 20 — 28 points] 100 feet identified [Coastal Lagoon] 125 feet in the rating form) [Estuarine] 125 feet [Natural Heritage Wetland] Buffer width based [Bog] on score for H [Forested] functions or WQ [Not meeting above functions characteristics] 50 feet Note: Wetlands shall be classified using the 2004 Washington State Department of Ecology's Wetland Rating System for Western Washington (Ecology Publication No. 04-06-025), or as amended. Table 18.22.330(2) WETLAND CATEGORIES, RATING SCORES AND BUFFER WIDTHS FOR MODERATE IMPACT LAND USES Moderate impact land uses shall include the following: • Single-family residential use on parcels of one acre or larger; • Private roads or driveways serving three or more residential parcels; • Paved trails; • Passive recreation areas; • Utility corridors (private or public) with a maintenance road; • Class IV-General forest conversions, including conversion option harvest plans. + An Additional Buffer Width with Distance from ar Wetland Characteristics: an Identified Wetland Category • Habitat(H) Wetland Boundary Apparent Wetlam •Water Quality (WQ) Boundary (Delineated) (Not Delineated) IV [Total of scores less than 30 40 feet +20 feet (Total of scores for all points] functions is less than 30 points) Ill [With H score 20 — 28 points] 110 feet +30 feet (Total of scores for all [Not meeting above 60 feet functions is 30 — 50 characteristic] points) http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 44 of 67 II [WQ score 24 — 32 points 75 feet +40 feet (Total of scores for all and H score less than 20 225 feet functions is 51 —69 points] 110 feet points or having [H score 29 — 36 points] 110 feet "special [H score 20 — 28 points] 110 feet characteristics" [Estuarine] 75 feet identified in the rating [Interdunal] form) [Not meeting above characteristics] [WQ score 24 — 32 points 75 feet +50 feet (Total of scores for all and H score less than 20 225 feet functions is more than points) 110 feet 70 points or having [H score 29 — 36 points] 150 feet "special [H score 20 — 28 points] 150 feet characteristics" [Coastal Lagoon] 190 feet identified in the rating [Estuarine] 190 feet form) [Natural Heritage Wetland] Buffer width based [Bog] on score for H [Forested] functions or WQ [Not meeting above functions characteristics] 75 feet Note: Wetlands shall be classified using the 2004 Washington State Department of Ecology's Wetland Rating System for Western Washington (Ecology Publication No. 04-06-025), or as amended. Table 18.22.330(3) WETLAND CATEGORIES, RATING SCORES AND BUFFER WIDTHS FOR HIGH IMPACT LAND USES High impact land uses shall include the following: • Single-family residential use on parcels smaller than one acre; • Commercial, multifamily, industrial and institutional uses; • Public roads. + An Additional Wetland Characteristic: Buffer Width with Distance from an an Identified Wetland Category • Habitat (H) Apparent Wetlanc • Water Quality (WQ) Wetland Boundary Boundary (Delineated) (Not Delineated) IV [Total of scores less than 50 feet +20 feet (Total of scores for all 30 points] functions is less than 30 points) http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 45 of 67 III [With H score 20—28 150 feet +30 feet (Total of scores for all points] 80 feet functions is 30 — 50 [Not meeting above points) characteristic] II [WQ score 24 — 32 points 100 feet +40 feet (Total of scores for all and H score less than 20 300 feet functions is 51 — 69 points] 150 feet points or having [H score 29— 36 points] 150 feet "special characteristics" [H score 20— 28 points] 150 feet identified in the rating [Estuarine] 100 feet form) [Interdunal] [Not meeting above characteristics] [WQ score 24 — 32 points 100 feet +50 feet (Total of scores for all and H score less than 20 300 feet functions is more than points] 150 feet 70 points or having [H score 29 — 36 points] 200 feet "special characteristics" [H score 20 — 28 points] 200 feet identified in the rating [Coastal Lagoon] 250 feet form) [Estuarine] 250 feet [Natural Heritage Wetland] Buffer width based [Bog] on score for H [Forested] functions or WQ [Not meeting above functions characteristics] 100 feet Note: Wetlands shall be classified using the 2004 Washington State Department of Ecology's Wetland Rating System for Western Washington (Ecology Publication No. 04-06-025), or as amended. (7) Reducing Buffer Widths. Upon submission of a special report by a qualified professional that demonstrates a buffer reduction does not have any adverse impact on the existing functions and values of the wetland, the administrator shall have the authority to reduce the prescribed buffer widths, (within a defined area), listed in the section above; provided, that all of the following shall apply: (a) The buffer of a Category I or II wetland is not reduced to less than 75 percent of the required buffer or 50 feet, whichever is greater; (b) The buffer of a Category Ill or IV wetland is not reduced to less than 75 percent of the required buffer, or 25 feet, whichever is greater; (c) The applicant implements reasonable measures to reduce the adverse impacts of structures and appurtenances on the subject parcel as determined by the administrator; (d) Buffer area reduction shall be minimized to accommodate only those structures and appurtenances as approved by the administrator. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 46 of 67 (8) Averaging Buffer Widths. Upon submission of a special report by a qualified professional that demonstrates a buffer reduction does not have any adverse impact on the existing functions and values of the wetland, the administrator shall have the authority to average wetland buffer widths on a case-by-case basis; provided, that all of the following shall apply: (a) The buffer averaging does not have any adverse impact on the functions and values of the wetland; (b) The total area contained within the buffer after averaging is no less than that which would be contained within the prescribed buffer, and the buffer boundary remains more or less parallel to the wetland boundary in order to avoid the creation of panhandles; (c) The most sensitive, or highest value, areas of the wetland have the widest buffer dimensions, and the buffer boundary takes into account variations in slope, soils, or vegetation to optimize the overall effectiveness of the buffer; (d) The minimum buffer width is no less than 75 percent of the standard prescribed buffer width; (e) The buffer has not been reduced in accordance with subsection (5) of this section. Buffer averaging is not allowed if the width of the entire buffer has been reduced already. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.340 Noncompensatory enhancement. Noncompensatory enhancement projects are those which are conducted solely to increase the functions and values of an existing wetland and which are not required to be conducted pursuant to the mitigation requirements of JCC 18.22.330. There are two types of noncompensatory enhancement: (1) Type 1 Noncompensatory Enhancement. Type 1 noncompensatory enhancement projects involve the filling, draining, or excavating of a regulated wetland. All applications for Type 1 noncompensatory enhancement projects shall be accompanied by an enhancement plan prepared in accordance with subsections (1)(a) and (1)(b) of this section, which demonstrates that the proposed activities will result in an increase in wetland functions and values. (a) The enhancement plan must be submitted for review, and approved by the administrator. (b) The enhancement plan must either be prepared by a qualified wetlands consultant or accepted in writing by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, or the Washington Department of Ecology. (2) Type 2 Noncompensatory Enhancement. Type 2 noncompensatory enhancement projects involve wetland alterations that do not include the filling, draining, or excavating of a regulated wetland. Such projects might involve the removal of nonnative plant species or the planting of native plant species. All applications for Type 2 http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 47 of 67 noncompensatory enhancement projects shall be accompanied by an enhancement plan prepared in accordance with subsections (2)(a) through (2)(c) of this section, which demonstrates that the proposed activities will result in an increase in wetland functions and values. (a) The enhancement plan shall be submitted for review, and approved, by the administrator. (b) The enhancement plan must include a detailed description of the activity including the following information: (i) The goal of the enhancement project; (ii) What plants, if any, will be removed or planted; (iii) How the activity will be conducted, including the type(s) of tools or machinery to be used; and (iv) The qualifications of the individual who will be conducting the enhancement activity. (c) The enhancement plan must either be prepared by a qualified wetlands consultant or accepted in writing by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, or the Washington Department of Ecology. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.350 Mitigation. The overall goal of mitigation shall be no net loss of wetland function, value, and acreage. (1) Mitigation Sequence. Mitigation includes avoiding, minimizing, or compensating for adverse impacts to regulated wetlands or their buffers. When a proposed use or development activity poses potentially significant adverse impacts to a regulated wetland or its buffer, the preferred sequence of mitigation as defined below shall be followed unless the applicant demonstrates that an overriding public benefit would warrant an exception to this preferred sequence. (a) Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of actions on that portion of the site which contains the regulated wetland or its buffer; (b) Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation; (c) Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment; (d) Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action; or (e) Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 1 8.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 48 of 67 (2) Compensatory Mitigation — General Requirements. As a condition of any permit or other approval allowing alteration which results in the loss or degradation of regulated wetlands, or as an enforcement action pursuant to Chapter 18.50 JCC, compensatory mitigation shall be required to offset impacts resulting from the actions of the applicant or any code violator. (a) Except persons exempt under this article, any person who alters or proposes to alter regulated wetlands shall restore or create areas of wetland equivalent to or larger than those altered in order to compensate for wetland losses. The following table specifies the ratios that apply to creation or restoration that is in-kind, on-site, and is accomplished prior to or concurrently with alteration: Table 18.22.350 Required Replacement Ratios for Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Category Re- Rehabilitation Re- Re- Enhancemen and Type establishment Only1 establishment establishment Only1 of or Creation or Creation or Creation Wetland (R/C) and (R/C) and Impacts Rehabilitation Enhancement (RH)1 (E)1 All 1.5:1 3:1 1:1 R/C and 1:1 1:1 R/C and 2:1 6:1 Category RH E IV All 2:1 4:1 1:1 R/C and 2:1 1:1 R/C and 4:1 8:1 Category RH E III Category II Case-by-case 4:1 Case-by-case Case-by-case Case-by-case Estuarine Rehabilitation of an estuarine wetland Category II 2:1 4:1 1:1 R/C and 2:1 Not considered Not considere Interdunal Compensation Compensation RH an option2 an option2 has to be has to be Compensation interdunal interdunal has wetland wetland to be interdunal wetland All Other 3:1 6:1 1:1 R/C and 4:1 1:1 R/C and 8:1 12:1 Category II RH E Category I 6:1 12:1 1:1 R/C and 1:1 R/C and 24:1 Forested 10:1 RH 20:1 E http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 49 of 67 Category Re- Rehabilitation Re- Re- Enhancemen and Type establishment Only1 establishment establishment Only1 of or Creation or Creation or Creation Wetland (R/C) and (R/C) and Impacts Rehabilitation Enhancement (RH)1 (E)1 Category I 4:1 8:1 1:1 R/C and 6:1 1:1 R/C and 16:1 Based on RH 12:1 E Score for Functions Category I Not considered 6:1 R/C not R/C not Case-by-case Natural 3 Rehabilitation of considered considered possible Heritage a Natural possible3 possible3 Site Heritage site Category I Not considered 6:1 R/C not R/C not Case-by-case Coastal 3 Rehabilitation of considered considered possible 3 Lagoon a coastal possible3 possible3 lagoon Category I Not considered 6:1 R/C not R/C not Case-by-case Bog 3 Rehabilitation of considered considered possible 3 a bog possible3 possible3 Category I Case-by-case 6:1 Case-by-case Case-by-case Case-by-case Estuarine Rehabilitation of an estuarine wetland 1 These ratios are based on the assumption that the rehabilitation or enhancement actions implemented represent the average degree of improvement possible for the site. Proposals to implement more effective rehabilitation or enhancement actions may result in a lower ratio, while less effective actions may result in higher ratio. The distinction between rehabilitation and enhancement is not clear-cut. Instead, rehabilitation and enhancement actions span a continuun Proposals that fall within the gray area between rehabilitation and enhancement will result in a ratio that lies between the ratios for rehabilitation and the ratios for enhancement. 2 Due to the dynamic nature of interdunal systems, enhancement is not considered an ecologically appropriate action. 3 Natural heritage sites, coastal lagoons, and bogs are considered irreplaceable wetlands because they perform some functions that cannot be replaced through compensatory mitigation. Impacts to such wetlands would therefore result in a net loss of some functions no matter what kind of compensation is proposed. (b) Compensation must be completed prior to wetland destruction, where possible. http://www.codepubl i shing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/htm 1/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 50 of 67 (c) Compensatory mitigation must follow an approved compensatory mitigation plan pursuant to this article, with the replacement ratios as specified above. (d) Compensatory mitigation must be conducted on property that will be protected and managed to avoid further development or degradation. The applicant or code violator must provide for long-term preservation of the compensation area. (e) The applicant shall demonstrate sufficient scientific expertise, supervisory capability, and financial resources, including bonding, to carry out the project. The applicant must demonstrate the capability for monitoring the site and making corrections if the project fails to meet projected goals. (f) Compensatory mitigation must monitor the impact and take appropriate corrective measures. (3) Compensatory Mitigation — Type, Location, and Timing. (a) Priority will be given to in-kind, on-site compensation if feasible and if the wetland to be lost has a moderate to high functional value. (b) When the wetland to be impacted is of a limited functional value and is degraded, compensation may be of the wetland community type most likely to succeed with the highest functional value possible. (c) Out-of-kind compensation may be allowed when out-of-kind replacement will best meet identified goals (for example, replacement of historically diminished wetland types). Where out-of-kind replacement is accepted, greater acreage replacement ratios may be required to compensate for lost functional values. (d) Off-site compensation can be allowed only if: (i) On-site compensation is not feasible due to hydrology, soils, waves, or other factors; (ii) On-site compensation is not practical due to probable adverse impacts from surrounding land uses; (iii) Potential functional values at the site of the proposed restoration are significantly greater than the lost wetland functional values; or (iv) Off-site compensation will be conducted in accordance with subsection (4) of this section (Cooperative Compensation Projects). (e) Except in the case of cooperative compensation projects, off-site compensation must occur within the same watershed where the wetland loss occurs; provided, that Category IV wetlands may be replaced outside of the watershed if there is no reasonable technical alternative. The stormwater storage function provided by Category IV wetlands must be provided for within the design of the development project. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 51 of 67 (f) Except in the case of cooperative compensation projects, in selecting compensation sites applicants must pursue locations in the following order of preference: (i) Filled, drained, or cleared sites which were formerly wetlands and where appropriate hydrology exists; and (ii) Upland sites, adjacent to wetlands, if the upland is significantly disturbed and does not contain a mature forested or shrub community of native species, and where the appropriate natural hydrology exists. (g) Construction of compensation projects must be timed to reduce impacts to existing wildlife and flora. Construction must be timed to assure that grading and soil movement occurs during the dry season. Planting of vegetation must be specifically timed to the needs of the target species. (h) A mitigation plan shall include a monitoring plan. The duration, frequency and methods of monitoring depend on a project's goals, objectives, and performance standards. In general, monitoring is required for at least five years. If a scrub-shrub or forested vegetative community is proposed, monitoring may be required for 10 years or more. Monitoring may be extended if interim performance standards are not met. (4) Cooperative Compensation Projects. The county may encourage, facilitate, and approve cooperative projects where one or more applicants, or an organization with demonstrated capability, may undertake a compensation project if it is demonstrated that: (a) Creation of one or several larger wetlands may be preferable to many small wetlands; (b) The group demonstrates the organizational and fiscal capability to act cooperatively; (c) The group demonstrates that long-term management of the compensation area can and will be provided; and (d) There is a clear potential for success of the proposed compensation at the identified compensation site. Conducting compensation as part of a cooperative process does not reduce or eliminate the required replacement ratios outlined in this article. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] Article VIII. Special Reports 18.22.360 General requirements. (1) The administrator may require a special report or reports when critical areas are impacted. (2) Special reports for critical areas shall include a scale map of the development proposal site and a written report. http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/J effersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 52 of 67 (3) The special report shall identify and characterize any critical area as a part of the larger development proposal site, assess impacts of the development proposal on any critical area on or adjacent to the development proposal site, and assess the impacts of any alteration proposed for a critical area. (4) The special report shall propose adequate protection mechanisms that may include mitigation, maintenance and monitoring plans, and performance surety. (5) Special reports shall include documentation certifying the qualifications of the preparer. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.370 Waivers. The administrator may waive the requirement for a special report when an applicant demonstrates all of the following: (1) The proposal involved will not affect the critical area in a manner contrary to the goals, purposes and objectives of this code. (2) The minimum protection standards required by this chapter are satisfied. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.380 Retaining consultants. Jefferson County may retain consultants to assist in the review of special reports outside the range of staff expertise. The applicant shall pay for the costs of retaining said consultants. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.390 Acceptance of special reports. (1) The administrator shall verify the accuracy and sufficiency of all special reports within 42 calendar days of their submission. (2) If the administrator finds that a special report does not accurately reflect site conditions, or does not incorporate appropriate protections mechanisms, the administrator shall cite evidence (e.g., soil samples, well log data, etc.) that demonstrates where the special report is insufficient or in error. The applicant may then either revise the special report and submit another special report, or appeal the administrative determination pursuant to this code. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.400 Aquifer recharge area report. (1) General. Aquifer recharge area reports serve as the primary means for Jefferson County to verify the accuracy of its critical aquifer recharge area map and to determine specific aquifer protection measures to be applied to prevent significant adverse groundwater quality impacts. (2) Aquifer Recharge Area Report Content. An initial evaluation shall be made by a qualified groundwater scientist/engineer. The aquifer recharge area report shall include: (a) A detailed description of the project, including all processes and other activities that have the potential for contaminating groundwater; (b) A hydrogeologic evaluation that includes, at a minimum: http://www.codepubl ishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 53 of 67 (i) A description of the hydrogeologic setting of the aquifer region; (ii) Site location, topography, drainage, and surface water bodies; (iii) Soils and geologic units underlying the site; (iv) Groundwater characteristics of the area, including flow direction and gradient, and existing groundwater quality; (v) The location and characteristics of wells and springs within 1,000 feet of the site; (vi) An evaluation of existing groundwater recharge; and (vii) A discussion and evaluation of the potential impact of the proposal upon groundwater recharge; (c) A contaminant transport analysis for the uppermost groundwater supply aquifer assuming an accidental spill or release of project-specific contaminants or on-site sewage discharge, or both if applicable; (d) A discussion and evaluation that details available on-site spill response and containment equipment, employee spill response training, and emergency service coordination measures; (e) Proposed best management practices to minimize exposure of permeable surfaces to potential pollutants and to prevent degradation of groundwater quality; and (f) Requirements for a monitoring program with financial guarantees/assurances that the monitoring program will be implemented. (3) Professional Qualifications. The minimum qualifications for groundwater scientists and engineers performing groundwater and contaminant transport evaluations and preparing aquifer recharge area reports shall be established pursuant to acceptable industry standards for training and experience and as established by the state of Washington in the Washington Administrative Code or by statute. (4) County Review. Reports shall be forwarded to the Jefferson County environmental health division for technical review. The environmental health division shall review the reports within 30 days of receipt to determine their adequacy. The county may request additional information in order to determine the adequacy of the reports. The administrator shall determine appropriate conditions as identified in the report to mitigate proposed land uses. The administrator shall be authorized to collect fees necessary to recover costs associated with processing and review of aquifer recharge area reports, implementation of the protection standards contained in this chapter, and administration of the general provisions of the critical aquifer recharge area provisions of this code. Such fees will be incorporated into the Jefferson County fee schedule. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.410 Drainage and erosion control plan. http://www.codepubli shing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 54 of 67 (1) General. This plan shall address best management practices that are physical, structural or managerial practices that, when used singly or in combination, prevent or reduce pollution of water. (2) Qualifications of the Preparer. Drainage and erosion control plans shall be prepared by a licensed professional engineer, except for small parcel erosion control plans. (3) Information Requirements. The design standards and information requirements for submission of drainage and erosion control plans shall be established in accordance with the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual currently adopted by Jefferson County. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.420 Geotechnical report. (1) General. This report shall include a description of the geology of the site, conclusions and recommendations regarding the effect of geologic conditions on the proposal, and opinions and recommendations on the suitability of the site to be developed. (2) Qualifications of the Preparer. Geotechnical reports shall be prepared by a licensed geotechnical engineer, a professional geologist, or a licensed professional engineer knowledgeable in regional geologic conditions with professional experience in landslide, erosion, or seismic hazard evaluation. (3) Information Requirements. (a) A description of the geologic setting of the region, based upon readily available data, including: (i) Site location and topography; (ii) Soils and geologic units underlying the site; (iii) The location and characteristics of springs within 1,000 feet of the site; and (iv) Level of hazard in CMZ. (b) An evaluation of the potential impact of the proposal upon existing geological hazards. (c) A discussion and evaluation of the potential impact of the proposal upon existing geological hazards. (d) Recommendations on appropriate protection mechanisms, if necessary, to minimize the risk of erosion or landslide. [Ord. 3-08 § 11 18.22.430 Grading plan. (1) General. This plan shall identify the proposed development project including the movement of material on-site, along with the proposed and existing contours of the site, and cross-sections thereof. (2) Qualifications of the Preparer. Grading plans shall be prepared by a licensed professional engineer or an individual with at least three years experience in the http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 55 of 67 preparation of grading plans who is knowledgeable of soil conditions and geology in Jefferson County. (3) Information Requirements. (a) A description of the general vicinity of the proposed site. (b) The property limits and accurate contours of existing ground and details of terrain and area drainage. (c) Limiting dimensions, elevations of finish contours to be achieved by the grading, and proposed drainage channels and related construction. (d) Detailed plans of all surface and subsurface drainage devices, walls, cribbing, dams and other protective devices to be constructed with, or as a part of, the proposed work together with a map showing the drainage areas and the estimated runoff of the areas served by any drains. (e) The location of any buildings or structures on the property where the work is to be performed and the location of any buildings or structures on land of adjacent owners that are within 15 feet of the property or which may be affected by proposed grading operations. (f) A discussion and evaluation of the potential impact of the proposed grading upon designated critical areas. (g) Recommendations on appropriate protection mechanisms, if necessary, to prevent degradation of designated critical areas and to ensure public safety. [Ord. 3- 08 § 1] 18.22.440 Habitat management plan. (1) General. This report shall identify how the development impacts of the proposed project will be mitigated. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Priority Habitat and Species Management Recommendations shall be the basis for this report. (2) Qualifications of the Preparer. Habitat management plans shall be prepared by persons who have a minimum of a bachelor's degree in wildlife or fisheries habitat biology, or a related degree in a biological field from an accredited college or university with a minimum of four years experience as a practicing fish or wildlife habitat biologist. (3) Information Requirements. (a) A map(s) prepared at an easily readable scale, including the following information: (i) The location of the proposed development site, including property limits; (ii) The relationship of the site to surrounding topographic and cultural features; (iii) The nature and density of the proposed development or land use change; http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 56 of 67 (iv) Proposed building locations and arrangements; and (v) The boundaries of forested areas. (b) A legend that includes the following information: (i) A complete and accurate legal description as prescribed by the triggering application form (the description shall include the total acreage of the parcel); (ii) Title, scale and north arrows; (iii) Date, including revision dates, if applicable; and (iv) Certificates by a professional biologist as appropriate. (c) A report that contains the following information: (i) A description of the nature, density and intensity of the proposed development in sufficient detail to allow analysis of such land use change upon identified fish and wildlife habitat; (ii) The applicant's analysis of the effect of the proposed development, activity or land use change upon the fish or wildlife species identified by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife within the identified priority habitat, utilizing the management guidelines; (iii) A plan by the applicant that shall explain how any adverse impacts created by the development will be mitigated. (d) Possible mitigating measures that may include, but are not limited to: (i) Establishment of buffer zones; (ii) Preservation of critically important plants and trees; (iii) Limitation of access to habitat area; (iv) Seasonal restriction of construction activities; and (v) Establishing a timetable for periodic review of the plan. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.450 Wetland delineation report. (1) General. This report shall be required when a proposed development encroaches upon a designated wetland or its buffer, and shall be used to identify the boundaries and classification of the designated wetland. (2) Qualifications of the Preparer. Wetland delineation reports shall be prepared by a biologist with wetlands expertise, a professional wetland scientist certified by the Society of Wetland Scientists. (3) Information Requirements. http://www.codepubl ishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 57 of 67 (a) A map(s) prepared at an easily readable scale, including the following information: (i) Wetland boundaries; (ii) Sample site and sample transects; (iii) Boundaries of forested areas; and (iv) Boundaries of wetland classes if multiple classes exist. (b) A legend that includes the following information: (i) A complete and accurate legal description as prescribed by the triggering application form (the description shall include the total acreage of the parcel); (ii) Title, scale and north arrows; (iii) Date, including revision dates, if applicable; and (iv) Certificates by a professional biologist as appropriate. (c) A report that contains the following information: (i) A discussion of the delineation methods and results, with special emphasis on technique used from the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual, March 1997, or as amended hereafter; (ii) A description of relevant site information acquired from the National Wetland Inventory maps and the Soil Survey for Jefferson County; (iii) The acreage of each wetland on the site, based on the survey, if the acreage will impact the buffer size determination or the project design; (iv) All completed field data sheets numbered to correspond to each sample site; (v) Project cross-sections, both before and after completion, in relation to the surface elevation of the wetland must be indicated for proposed activities that involve cutting or filling operations within the wetland or its proposed buffer; (vi) Classification of the wetland in accordance with the standards adopted in this chapter and a detailed written analysis of the existing regulated wetland including: vegetation communities classified per the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Classification of Deepwater Habitats (1979); species composition of vegetation communities, including presence and percent cover; existing soils; and existing hydrologic conditions including inflow/outflow, source of water within the system, relative water quality, and seasonal changes in hydrology, if applicable; (vii) A detailed analysis of wildlife species use of the wetland and its buffer; http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/html/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Page 58 of 67 (viii) A detailed analysis of the existing wetland buffer including species composition and percent coverage, whether the buffer is disturbed or not, and the functional value of the buffer in relation to the regulated wetland; (ix) If the development activity would eliminate all or part of a regulated wetland then a detailed compensatory mitigation plan as outlined in subsection (4) of this section must be provided. (4) Mitigation Plan Contents. All wetland restoration, creation, and enhancement projects required by this code, either as a condition of project approval or as the result of an enforcement action, shall follow a mitigation plan prepared by a qualified specialist as defined herein and conducted in accordance with the requirements described in this code. The applicant or violator must receive written approval of the mitigation plan by the administrator prior to commencement of any wetland restoration, creation, or enhancement activity. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] icle IX. Alternative Protection Standards — Critical Area Stewardship P .ns (CASPs) 18.22.460 Cri• al area stewardship plans (CASPs) — Generally. Property owners elect to develop site-specific critical area stewar. hip plans (CASPs) as an altern- •ve to the prescriptive requirements of Articl-: VI (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conserva '•n Areas (FWHCAs)) through VII (We -nds) of this chapter. At a minimum, the CASP must • *vide equal or greater protectio• of critical area functions and values than the prescriptive -ndards of buffers and s- backs. The property owner shall be responsible for developing t -se plans in consu -tion with a qualified professional meeting the applicable requirements of icle VIII of this chapter. When available, qualified Jefferson County staff ma(ass. t landowners with these submissions. The administrator shall be responsible for revie ng and approving submitted plans. The administrator may, at his/her discretion, see ech ' al assistance from the Jefferson County conservation district, Washington epartmen f Fish and Wildlife or the Washington Department of Ecology wh n reviewing CA s for approval. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.461 Applicability and limit ions. N The following provisions define e applicability and limitations dfthe CASP: (1) CASPs apply to only re: dential development, related activities ap,d appurtenances, including accessory dw- ing units (ADUs). They may be used in rural°village centers (RVCs) but are not t• •e used in urban growth areas (UGAs). They are i?ot to be used for commercial or ind , trial uses or developments, as identified and defined ir1'Chapter 18.10 JCC. . (2) They c• be applied to properties one-quarter acre or larger. \° (3) C'' SPs are only applicable to fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas (Article I) or ■ etlands (Article VII). (4) CASPs must provide equal or greater protection of critical area functions and values than the prescriptive standards of buffers and setbacks. http://www.codepub]ishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty/htmt/JeffersonCount... 3/14/2012 i ., APN: -'I 0-I O`"I Lk DD--Lo NAME: L' ' I YF L2—14 Add.APN Add.APN NOi Printed Printed SPAAD Category Intake Req's ❑ ❑ County Zoning ❑ IX PS J : ID Cases/Conditions by Parcel# ❑ l �n � Water Service Area ❑ QL y t""` Plat Maps El r Laserfiche Documents ❑ Road System "' ".,( Assessor Maps-H ❑ 0 Lots ❑ �pr°�l par P Parcel Tags-H ❑ 1)i i.Ir o c7Zfj ' lJ Permits -H ❑ V 2006-07 Shoreline Photos ❑ Left/ ight Shoreline Arcs ,❑ Shoreline Polygons tXr\ M DNR FP Stream Class r DNR Stream El DNR Water Bodies ❑ . LFA-Fish [X ■ Soils -H ❑ X Marbled Murrulets f[8, ■ Heritage Points ❑ ► Type: Spotted Owls 0 Bald Eagle Nests &Buffers 0 Priority Habitats and Species 8/06 rIK ■ Type Wetlands ❑ f - Rare Plants-Ecosystems g ❑ Type: Seismic Hazard ❑ (,15I +iii)_, � ri '(ca Landslide Hazard ❑ l ii s i ) CoL FEMA FIRMS ❑ Map Panel#: Erosion Hazard ❑ Critical Aquifer Recharge areas ❑ ( /SLi- Wells-Chloride ❑ V Mineral Lands ❑ Shoreline Slope Stability ❑ : 7/14bk Q Chanel Migration ❑ Airport Overlays ❑ No Shooting Zone X ❑ SIPZ ❑ K I'0). L/\ r ')(4 /*ac County Zoning -UGA El, ❑ LIDAR Hillshade ❑ USGS Topos ❑ 2011 Aerial Photos ❑ Assessor's Info ❑ 14 MLA Number Form ❑ ❑ Pre Application File ❑ ❑ Reviewer Letter Sent ❑ ❑ Eagle C Wetland C Eagle Plan Required ❑ ❑ 1 page ❑ Habitat Man Plan ❑ ESA Map Checklist 10-13-2008 Map Output Page 1 of 1 • ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map ,1-.....1, 4.9200013 �:.�. .9 .. 921092017 5921092016! YHNcrxrk ,o YF-3X a '... , ,/ 92102000 :921092X' .- r !.k y k_ _ -- Legend 20 § —I• Legend 2l 2I 0 Selected Features 9'70230k 977730340 JG Raads 62...r 4,‘•9N'O f f210BZ015. 1'00')28 _ a(.: 'r.r. Irin_ ,rvttp91 Parcels-1i 421052062 r: i49 county zoning -'.2011 3 021092012, s _r ' Gybe It Rd 1 *•7* S&"b :: -..- .- frC058 1199 SF Too. Finn Trail ,- Moan Rd (, Ru.M Rmamtn ld 921081035 '^ 92 51'51 911002077 9210920)6 ! .:31e'1 ,e'•.aC 1''2'16"! �C Y HA01fi Rure RaWanld 1 W 921093018 921093030. v , 92.F-1 'S' ,2 Ru.y Rewmtm 120 921094020 92f092029 9210900]8 ' MPRSmge Fenny ..s Yrr.'r�r�a laswxx 1099025' ■ 999 9332..33 921009017; 92'0945L2 M PR Resin Cempine r4I•.-'-D .921093003. "':923 3 4 92'x_51" 3 :a11i05 92'_5102' Para,ma Recrcalwn .'1,12 92'l-72.107' 92'0 El ape.Oven Space 41X)5 92'.94(729 !wr'2 920432 •.L116 Rd .fr GSney Rd. 0X0020260 9 H9_'• Rural Femn Mli y � . Commdcalron,. '# 4( 4; 92•03157] In fl 0 Fours, 92P033c-a 4,'�'e2 ,. 429059928 . hY y "� 9213912t.. Y,. u Ind 2S11421 ea.F lu 92109.'1026 /21030019 ... 92t09S026 AnPOn[vr . 921003030 9210920'2 '1 rte. 92 5X(. 2 q 92 HY12s Y ■ MPRVildOe Cat. 9e,Y:3024 m gi AP 1:X „Xt 42.042'3 ■ Plow 00Mge Contar x w; 4r1sJY,•, :-•.:`x. ■ RasmiWoOsd Ind. 9211600100! 0051 FEU 1041 9211)030) NPR.Rac..en W acloMgrnt CPT 9$1163390 LOU ue i ■ Cressreads4C ■ Cro.....1-CC ■ CrP®wd111C ■ 41:20 —` MI 9SA-urban cmmm.e 110A-0Aar L.qM 1ntl0Brl1 9on.Moe USA NOR 90A.PtbbC USA LOP IlM{l J0A.Vruter Dnnnted Cammmcai MPR-BON ammo., Me.590Sob JtbarCOet/Cea.rt Sc-to GIS 0■109011 CF-AYRLOCmmarc94 Forest Mm.M Rewurm0wrCF FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07:14:27 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&C1ien1V ersion=4.... 2/27/2012 Ma p Output Page 1 of 1 tP ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 92109101-1 921092076.-.921011221211L J-921092017_1 921092018 _977100008_ 911)00033 977700V339iNWiYXi v))1,%p3l I. 921061018 ___1,,_ i 92,061016921092009 �I: 92,09X81 i 977TJ0026 9)110003! / 921092006 _ ,� ` 021061017 921092007 921000020y� I977700W19)))00039 _ _ 1 977----- 9777,3304997n02047 977 g 97770006-� r `I 92,0920,0..j.__ ._ f �Y9¢,o92916 9»rmos6 ( 1 9n9)79o0 /i� J rn00090 92,an,a16-----�-.. I 92108061 '' -X977700090 921092011 ' 921092012 Z 9rT70W51 1y17700n57� 3 'Gybe 190>b� .,-Fits Tr69 m '•,� .077100056 2 . ■ !e_ , 1 ' cn' �,tae93s 921092077 190,09X 76 I 921094609 921091017 (i �j'4- 921094031 921094033 I e 921090.016 i 81099010 a �t� L._y f�921090020 r 10900In _4-_.,_ .__ 2323�0188,�}921091020 L '.92t092pM i ffi,092001 _ �;921aw0u 92,064017 921(194002' 1 r-i I 921093011 9.018001 1 L 921094013 , Legend 940140 9 H—, 921001023 92109/02/ ® Selected Features 021091022 921094027 __ 921093002 921099008 92109029 021094012' JC_Rwdc -- Rabbi,.Rd— Dias ''' '000033.330 c.9213940„ 92,064032 Y� T' Parcels H -I I 92109:018 0 1 !921094016 1 621093006 92/090019__""A 9140910111 lots 921064039 I 921091009 92109]018 92109100 I 92102308 921093014 N j -.-,. "`1. 921093006 921093012 _— I _� 1 921091026 921064022 421093022 -921!30' 921064001 1 I ,` 1 ,8 / 1 1 921093023 9216900,8 I} 9210230,7_ 921160000�. 9211700W 'I • , 921160000 A Mema,4.4ty A/ms1Cm.WCm*SSmlcs(215 0— °.1370 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07:15:13 2012 _ — 2/27/2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap.ServiceName ovmap&ChentVersion-4.... 2/27 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map w/0810,, 92109207,1 95092024 _,_92109201! ;. 925092016 _. 9>)100b ....9177 00033 977.7003331. 9]7100096 9]I1' ]00001 925065056 5 1 - _.-_ 91/700036 1 j 977700036 92,061016 ..921012006 921092065 :,®.,.. y� ` /: 921061017 921002020 j 977700041 907700039 3'''''''''" 977700004 97/700050 1--077700096977100010 =�' I, 921092017+ wx.�, 9c 1=2G'c 977J0001Ij 9!7 Y.h 9!7100049 921041024—... 977700046• I 92 uG`_ae 1 977700066 '2 .G 9210920+• 92.521!'2 y+f"i_•1� '-""°C 051 �9 l60 Ad°""..: 0 911100096 r7, Finis Tfai p Moen Rd !G "-�.. 921064036 y2'J9X'•'I y 092016 _N 41'09103 Ci„ 421094017 . €L92'094034 92'[n633 92:099032 ,112109901E C9 921099016 921061036 92'0 20 d 78 _ -_- . 19 921000020 —� 92109]001 921092078 1 ' 921094014 1921094030' Lir 921964018 - 921094006 (— ■i 92109408 9210!4017 -- 92109102 1,]u911per ;',921094013; Legend 1 9210930'3 92'093173 ' 921004023 921061009 �� 92'094022 921094027 931000021 Selected Features 02109]002 921094006 92109/029 921094012' JC_Rwds , —r— - ,---1 _.. -'Ha bbins Rd ""--`^•,.;pbAMer Rd.....I 000200!`921094011' Parcels-H 92106032 I �' I 1 J 4210930,5 .0 I : 1921091010 Water Service Areas 922930 2 921092014 ._-.1 921004007 •921089039 92109.'009 4210930/6 921094109 Cement ae 921093025 9210430'.1 ❑ Futuna s 921094024 92299300' 91'41/!'2 3 92.084022 921043022 92/093021 q m ..92+093124 41 I z-1c,5: l I ■ 921093022. 97'0920<8 _.. 92'0930'.7 S. • 92-60006 921170000 92116900 A Memamtded67JAssMC06,C44431 861.®/14 0■in 11376 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Oata contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07:14:51 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.e sri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 2/27/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map o 2 I 97"00933 :.'"9 ^-zt00f011 921092071' 10920091"3-93,092017 9210920,9 977)0x195 y977100'33 9 77700096911700031 92106101640 At 0 •� v 1 / _ ('� S — Sr 11 7 1 ,� �r� 977' ''-' A 977700033 9210111016921002009,• -i-1---4,92t09200d )i 941 092091 1 ��.'1 '.� ?20 IMny 9l 2100041 4777000.'19 �n^0 7 92,092020�I N. t ) i 1 977]000403 9C 7I d0*I— 21 !! ti — .e 977700050 3 I' 41770001E 9T>700040 k:„,,,, ..,,,,,, 1092010 90,097016 �77m , ' 1 �� f i f� 97T0005t 9171WW99]]]NMl =',ate�-- 11..,,> 1 tli0 2 I S )-r- i - _ \--....S.,-,' H 0 7 7 76 0 046 921092011 1921092012 4 9 t i ( g 971700091 � 977T00057977200051 "`G3M!10 TtE 1 _.__ Bt1L00059ra• 7921ee926 % / ■ -121092.077) /2,9 797[, 1'i 1 92t09g39}\ !b 92,0940,7 7 I 'ltf'66YI,OW031 92140)033 1 d 92,0940,9 - 1 f 921094032 9210x1019_9 ,. , 921091096 182,093004 f 1 9210 30779 1 -# �ex+wwmi 1 i ' 1 / 139 019 901:94c q 'mamas 020 492008017 -! r V i' i,1 (1,1 7 f i i 92,99E995 921 921094002 9217111 F E-17-'''-_,� `'11 / I� <1-s.�1„_ 1,, '�92,0940,3 Legend t,.• 019 1040003 5' { 9., • ..xi °21°114°°6-''-‘-'1 '� �.�� f / 1921094072 90109109) l :t... 921094021 n Selected Features 921090'02:1__J I 1 i , 021094009 921094029 5."921004012 9••/i JC_Roads t —7—... '�-p 1 T �� `� Dime,Rd eL■41 000002E0•.921094017'' 1 Parcels-1i 921004032 � 1 1� LI p2109�30(19 1 �_f t 92,094010 - Contours N i IL 92104009 91/0092019-7-'# f i 921094007 92f0610J9, ,A- ' l 92100009 920092019/ ' ,N 921094409,^- 10 Foe.Cen+uu. �I 1, 1 ,•� L. I & / 7 ,-- v' �/ WFowcome.. 92,090926"�.:92t0970u r - 7-H 7 921004026 92„0100! 92,990x30' 92100422 ?901'90421 f 1 , 51� r � ,�- _921093014 i 1 92160400. be, I 10,09]023 921607018' .� ✓ � .p 9z70900,7? I/ , . 921160000 /lr'.f ' C . . A Man noe4p.Maem Cush C*aa 9o.nes06 0■113711 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07:15:21 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&Client'ersion=4.... 2/27/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 7798!33 6 I�'+ 421061011 901042074-9Q1002929 -_.'�-821092011 9240ffiD,B,�19/7100008. j...B7JJ0001197. 9T11000B897t706O1T 93106,096 ,` IriYI Ipil., i 977/00036 977700038 1aI 7 «----1 93109I009 t -92t0➢2006 921997081 �i};�., n'iixl 111 l 911081 __ l'I m 1J 921092010 ', ( 9/T70L0,1 +INITO grtJ1810o<,�I 1 I - — - 1-- 11-_97/100OR 917100940+ 921081 ffi40920W 021040010 ' ---.�-� 00 1 977100031 7JTO8Mgtt lryr. i 921091L,6 r 97)70000.4 I 916 20 9219920„ 9:,OO21 12 T Gybe HO Rd .— - - _____-1977700057 �la ,. . 1 .. r Finis O Trill 61pN,r6t' .(Q E�:r1911 92'089035 9310920/7 911092076 921004031 9211 921091034 (� 91100401/31A -._.4 921091032 !821094018(.i 92t� .,2 9___I 36 921002079 ' I 92,092078 y 9210940'8 (( ,_ tli t921099000 —. 921093000 _ 92109 017 84 9210800,6 _.. ffi,091006 I,J 92t1084017 1 �021094 02 _1 i-1 921093013 921090000 t T -_ ' 921000023 �9210Y0240t1 %i Legend 021061005 190,084022 921004021 ,kF77 Selected Features y `_ ._921,:rx, �t004008 34077 Vri 92'000012. JC Roads se 99,061032 —r-7;.._ i --Robeiro Rd t fey%i eno rr" ,11142. Parcela43 i 1 92,09101f5 921094019 .: Shoreline 200 Fool Suffer■ 92,09]008 42,692919--16 921094029_'v 9..,..I 8 I 92,093000 921001018 g e 92 090017 1100 ,' �. 1 921998/21 : 1 n 92,0930118 9210/H04 921064022 ! 1 91,093012 - lii l.9 _ YQM93024� .111991 901061001._`--- 921090028 - 921093018 9 . L_...---921093017 '... �,.p . 921 0000. R 12.+1000 ...._:ta :1 m � 011 931160300 a l 9 '_. 1 191171 41 ..ilk 7 a1.. Iti-.. 91 Ii Kr - L" ,�5 Fr,�y 111 "k, ik 'iF 9,l,i. . 1 Y.NNp,.W�'.�`tl 'N.97 rIl M Mae evrieder 4'vm,CwryCefl9mcaaS tr®113711 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07:15:32 2012 http://gis server/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 2/27/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map I 9fl IOt1 9210120074_:n,o92029L_ 92t0YMtr_i_921OGQ0fe y ,. _. _ - 92106100 II ,,-" 9210111016921092036 - - II 9209208+ m ,Hd 4 ` 9 9210 91106+01Y 00 I I 940140!093 9171 9/11q%Y1A 1I' - __—_ I � 977700090 977700041 9777U(rr1!� 411092007 9z 10G20t0 I �,-9zt09Xlt6 �i r_._ 77700051 67770064:;,s-mcoW1 911061020. - __—, 921090042 7 —"— 977MrY,a R10920tt 901092012 977700061 9r77000Y - _—_....- ,9---11.579T7NW9G r 840 110 R0 Finis Tree 2 Moen Rd 16 921064006 f 9210/20/6 92:4°1111 !. 921092077 91'.A4131t 92+091431 'Y$ 0940016 ■i �- -- 92'09411[ 921094016 7 .. 92106b36 �-921094020 821002079 92)092016 w 1 921094016 921091020' —1 92,093001 - --'�_ w __ 92,OW025j 921064016 92.094409 5250e1CO2 92,m1o,r f.- L it eztd9Nd' legend 921093013 I ^-r-- 92+093003 911091021 42,09101' Selected Features 921064005 � 192,091022 921094027 921093002 I 920940081 431094029 j2tO10tz JCRoads _ ___t_. _.._ _RO099fa Rd�'--^ r--DcnQy Rd^�ppp000M0(�tOS4oil Parcel*41 92106/032 - 9310934'5 ;92' tOBi0t0 _ >. .., Parcel TaPoN 1I 9It09100L'. 92106/0,9 °,1093008 9 9210910190.301+ Na soceeeyon PI 92168]009 921009016 I $ . Spme97e,t } 921093029 92`4' '� � 931099028 .L.. 92tOWOt9 32':uiYi'1 ; y2I,9wzz z2•v9xz• z'w1622 ,. m 42t09Y1I4 I 9 !9Y)23' 92,0939.2 92+03011 _e x2190 92//60000 emmvu.eeW 'u'0..4 cure 64(eue06 0a-10m+o9d1 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07:17:14 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?S erviceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 2/27/2012 , Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map ,1•081011,921092074 921092029 92109611 9210920/8 ccow � 977,00091 9,7,0,013: 9/7700096 9)7700031 911091015 II 00038 077700038"081016921092009 921092081 9.:'081017 ' 97770063. 977190 97;79"n7uuw�r 97760910 97770001E 97779c049 921092°11 92109610 921092016. I; 1+081028 977700061 97770094997770077 92162062. -_ 1�917)00048 ,4'1 92 109201^ 921092012. N 977700051 97/700022 971700057 2'h Ho Rd aa.q 4• _. _ 991 ►9TT�7�0008�8ba . 9210920 �Re 92,00902'1 COra79270910l 92109676 �c#921094031 921094033 y 921091032 921094018(0■9 � 921081036 92199679 2 921V610X- 921096)9 W 9219X018 92'1/20030': '921004005 ._._______ • 921u94vni I .. 921094002 '- 929093013 tHy �NO 92,094023 92^034013' Legend 22'084005 .9210204/2 921098027 921094020r 0 s9199bd F98w9 .901093002 921094009 92109/029 121094012r - A/ JC_Ro9d9 .::••'s 19d ._"J OM ay Rd Z40 9210940/1 r _- P9rc9bA 9211. v. 92109301 921094010 P6HNba1 921093008 92109619 921094007 911089039 9210 .921092'09 921003016 921093025 921093014 N 921099028 921093008 921099012 •1'084022 92 099922 92109302t1.s w 021093024 m 1'06091 92,093018 921099017 , 921/80000 921170000' 921160000. Maas RU.dodt9-B159v1Carr9Cead SVTCa.G:=. FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this ma.is limited b the method and accura of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07:17:32 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 2/27/2012 Washington Coastal Atlas Photo Display Page 1 of 1 WASHIUu TOlf STATE Department of Eeotagy Coastal Atlas r. 6123/2006 11:22 AM f CO • - .. 3 x m Photo 060623_00609 Date: 6/23/2006 Area: Marrowstone Island - Reference: Admiralty Inlet puo Download links for this photo: Low Resolution(800 x 531 pixels, 56Kb) High Resolution(4288 x 2848 pixels,3585Kb) Approx.8 seconds for 56kbps modem,1 seconds for Cable/DSL Approx.8.5 minutes for 56kbps modem;75 seconds for Cable/DSL View photos of this area in other years: 1940s 1976-77 1992-97 2000-02 hops://fortre ss.wa.gov/ecy/coastalatlasphoto/PhotoDisplay.aspx?id=060623_00609&vinta... 2/27/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 9210860,1921092019-.921092029 921092017. 92ta0Q91a_.1 9077090Yb 517796033 9rlr0od3ti 9rn00Wr 921064015 IIY"--- 1-____ 977790016 977100016 921061016921092009 9Q,99200d II 90,01200 r- 9m 1.97 124092007 ffi/012020 19717000119;7]000. 97/7000/1 92;100019 121061 t1-_— 971]00030 ---i 77691>700010 --- I 8010929116 028 ffit0�10 I - ^_� 977700051 473200069927700047:. 1211192062 .6697000% 12109m 11 ,09m12 nR 972]00061 5977360037 1700050 Gybe H9 Rd - -•..- --___ Finn TraJ `o Moen Rd- 921060035 I 921093077 92,1920)6 3 90100400 61i-921090W €92'094031 921001013 901094/16 .. 4 921091032 @1000116 9S 91':640;2 121052019 - — .'---- -. 4'4 224724/20 926022018 2 -1 9x1099011 �{? (� 12109300/ �-_ .... -W 921691603 221991925 91"064018 927064 02 legend 1290717 12�_IioOWtu Rd 091001 1__ ❑nne Rda�000009 012 ' JC Selected Roods naves /21069003 1921000122 921094027 PS1ul041 921094032 I + Ines Arcs .._._� 921093015 12109400210104000 69nasrs�ry.auburw- 12f09X0B 121012019 Aa 92,091021 921094019 I 921093002 9210030'6 - I Canw.alcYMwwa� 1 T-0121063025 021093019 -----�_ c 921090026 921091006 921091012 ; SAUnw 32 2'060022 1 ! 9xtOW 12169402' Q27 .. .ID ,. 11206 921999024 Ywww 8 /�`/ 901001021 921040016 1 consonancy _--� _. ..__92102302 /`" 9a1uUSISYOINai 1211:ir other 921160000 mt vordtl 42 3df'ren 1610 Gve a 9:.m(Y9 ®113711 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07:17:45 2012 http://gi sserver/s ervlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 2/27/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map r 1011011 921052074 921012029 II-9210920"7 921092018_.., 9//1CCYXb 8!//1YYJ33 y ....-324/1/dNY'69//tt5,13/ 921091015 i ._ _.. -_. .._.. _ _--�. 9m655x / 9)17000111 1 921„4101692'091009 0420�U g2109X18t �.' 92109101/ 924/-42020 1 9)1)0004/ - ._-._. � ._-.—� 9)____ II 9777000499 11/1.^ 9)))00051 9)1((/00079 y� 4210920/6 � 971)00590 µ- I -I 921092007 I 921092010 92079, 92,0921„ 1 921090012 9)nOWS, �.+--977700148 921091012 1 911100055 GY09!b Rl F999 Pal Moen Rd___ J�977777�0005791110W- 921014039 6 -. 921090071 921092076 .921094031 9210 033 i �c 9210916416 ti 921094078 95 9z+ 92,091036 I 92,092079 '', —_l.'-- =--L_-' ,//Ei 17210940.:1 —I 921092007 9210920)4 '$ ..I 921094015 14921094010'5 921984014 W 921090703 ,921U9a0lSi1 _-t r 92101401? 9¢n•...,. • l 921593013 921093053 i *--r_-� 192,0940,3 Legend •.1064005 --1 I 92,094023,,921091021 0 Selected Features 921090002 921099022 92,094021 0 92109/008 911094629 ...92109401 „Al JC_Raadc __.,_._ R040i,a 707`---.*' 92109401 921684032 �- �—*9 Rd+—•000000160' Parcels-, 1 I ! 921090013 9 I 192109907 DNR Water 800iee 921041039 92f001001100.Y0011�59210930t� 921094009 1 f 921093025 921093014 -L ..j,,—f g 92,09c026 . N � I 921093008 927092012 ; ■ 4 't�d ( 421003022-_ � ._�,1, Me 0av9nxcn 9210/4001 1 921090023 I 921003018 ...._t_ • 9211. 921110000 21160'50 1 Nate pc.Aet• Ybem • Get•tlasai• FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained n this ma.is limited b the method and accurac of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07:18:15 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 2/27/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map . 97x2000131 Jrrd: 1 92,mi9,t 921092074-19210)3029�.—.{�-.smnm/21.- azm922u 9rrmlee�977100033, 972700096 enrol37 921!1216 � � 1 '\Cl ! �` ll}L- f + I ' f 977709932,,4 9772000.38 ,!i. 92t1g10169210930! n. 92102200!/ 921042!1 1;:.1111 MIRry Rd 92114101] 02,002030 'a — lI„9,�7x/00413. s7770014t 9777000.'19 ——+ _:::„.1......--' _ / YI 07 00090 �`- 107070008 7 ,l i 9210930M 1 02109Nn0 921002016 i 1 921061020 8011 92,O92p12 93f002�2Ani TN 'g'! \ ,M 9777OOWAf \ 1, `; 92f94nss 1 921003077 921001026 I,0 . 921014034 E$ 02,0414.1 1i I 921014!1 921081033. a 9210040`6 021094012 921004010 9 90084036 921012079 ' 921021020 yy I - 1 1 rA,921094020 l r t ' 921494°8 'c92t094030'f 0210040,4 92,093001 Y W 921001005 92fUW025,go', 921084012 �� — j /1'1?/ 921094002 I I-1 921093013 92100]003 I I ,/ I -I 1;..9210140.2'' II Legend 921094!8 1 f---- `` I y �1�0� '921O04U� J Selected Features \ 92100/022 921094027 .LI 411!]002 •r 921!/008.92,G94929i..4210140,2 aC_loads "- r-- R06601s Rtl OwNy Rd 7 1000=260 92,0014" j 92fO6W]2 \\ Parcels-H Sr %9210YOM8 '� 9z,00w,c,' Soils H 921091008 .92,092019-A 921091007 f 9210_0 t I 921023016y 921094009 j'� 9210030! eG _ 921099128 921014014 s __ .. ( _¢ �'" K 921094019 �. 991003008 92,0930112_.,,, I 921029022 L \_/ 92,993022 1921!0, 1 r -al 921093024 92;09.09, f— --1- 1i 921093023 21 921093919 . t - I----� L---------92,!3077----1 92„6(tl! 901120%22 , 921,60000 N 155.4.>.n.54 qJ 442.44,Cfla Sens 00 0■19bn FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07:18:31 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 2/27/2012 . Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma. •21091011 901022074-921092029 1.__L 921092017-1 921092016 :1 977700098 I I , 977700033 977700095 977700337 921061015 I ---, I 921001016921092009 L_ _ 977700336 : 977700036 921092061 -:"----1 921092905 _r_. _ Jr. 921092020 : $21061017_ 977700041 977700039 : I ......___.4 977700043 :e 977,00044 g210920 I annum [---.1 i 1 trrmcase Immo,* " 921092010 ] 921092016 WC 921061021 --i--- , __. 977700061 g7Troppo977700047, 92"0920a2 r.- 9irroco4a" 921092011 II 9210.2012 1 & 977700051 1 —1 977700055 977700057 IIIIIIIe'i 921094035 92C2°77 .1 421092078 -$ 421/24634 ( 921094017 --: - . L92'05401' 921094033 1 6a.'„ 921044016 ii 921004012 1 ,921004014_,44. 421024036 — 1 92,0°20,,? 92109,018 .., A92106402° 921093004 II i :221(7W" A 921crwoo salowne — ., sausoos , ______ti 921094025 2., 921094017 I 921094002 — - - 921093013 gz-0,3003 ':--7 1 921094023 f L 921094013- Legend ---- 021064036 --- _---__ ', '094022 021094027 :' 0 Selected Features - ' 921094006 921094029 ....921044012 „..- 4 - 41-4 JC_Roads 921064032 : 1—.4.131Iney Re 4—.000,002,4-921094011 Parcels-H Z 0 ' '921094010 1. 44'03,0,8 oe'o9,,.,-4 I 92109400/ - Montage Points 921064039 92,044009 94091409 92'(.930 : r., 921093025 921041014 l'c 92 09.4025 91'0931:05 92,29.504e ; 02',,r424 ,e4co1 92-....70:13 .2',..41:.:• .2",..,:t.,..., '.... '''"4°99 J4°.'"C°....IC°4"1''*'''','''8 fie 0■1011011 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07:18 44 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=--4.... 2/27/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map ( ff 70001) 92111011 921092024-:92,092029 L_ -021092017'L 92100201ST L 977100198 077703063___197___ 472700006 9m00037 ffi610169 ! 921061 y 1 977700096 92106116921092019 i_--.9210BN08 1 92+09606+ f�__.y __ 9210/2020 lJeey t 017 I 977 77700)1 9m00050 977700/0 921092007 039192010 921092016 977700osi .%710019 7 931191006 --i- 921 + _ Sinuous 921092011 I 921010012 977701st GY011 Flo Rd 9777000679777900% FitiTM�� 61090190f-0 92/010/6 @,012077 021092076 ! 921091029 <$ 92t09Wt7 / 9310101/ 921091011 f 921091016 _., �----,._ 91to9991z 92119WVa 921060171 921192079 —�___ _ _. 91101010 921009009 921091010. 921069016 9211102! 9zt9wu9s_; 921092016 92+0116 9214/901 w I j 92,091001 92+089097 I ....._ —1- --_.—.— szioso011 Legend `,, 921//011 92109]193 ! I 911099073 92109402t O. Selected Features 93101006 92109112 92101022 -•••F t 921090921 911099029 4210990+2 JCRoads -7- -r--_T._--7-_. -A968ita Rd 921069032 `--`,IaY RdiL�1000012a0.• 921099011' Parcals+t f � � 921003116 � - '-92199aot4 � Wetlands 92160]006 92/192019__.I 921099197 92t999W9 :.'�vtC39 I 921091009 921042018 92/093025 921093019 —i_.—I _ q21 921099005 921093012 @,041021 92'0&1922 ` I 92110022 921091031 901093011 7 i_ 9210120,]. >< 921160000 9207100 921169090 \Im a urban,.e!Fra,Comity^-en�e Fcvc�n G4S 0911∎■+010 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07:19:16 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 2/27/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map w ffif061on ffi10ffi074--'ffitwzozv9216m91 OffiOfa)L9r77pp08e -vrrro6wl 921091015 1 pi L___. W ffi106101592t08209 - 0x2061 �M ffit091006 9_00011 921061017 021092 977700048 BTIiW.,4 1— l I -� 97770001, -.- 9777000697770 *- . 92t09200J 82,090010 ,082016 's' 9)770081 91T700DM19�7�t 92,06,028— - 11- ' 1_ 19777000497,, 02100062 - —J , 92,0920 r 921092012 I E 977700051 l i 977M0056 ti � I 9nr6o6s7 l— FNt Teel s: 410u1 921064056 021092077 021091014 -'+-n1' 02109008 02109031 901094013 0C <'Vit ', I---- - 02109x32 I 9mo9w a o� 921084016 ffif091(p9 + f. — ffi1tl91 it 9210004 ffi10ffi97a ' 0210910t8 92109407/ ' 921064015 -- -` - 92109/696 r. Lffi1094015., i` 2084017 ISL__ __-- _ ,,,t 021921094x1 Le<j5 nd 921093013 '', 92109]00 ( 92100083 _11 '" Selected Features nCW 021100]02 1.92109422 921094027 � ffi1(M4r 1' 921091 921094029 9210940.2 JC.Roads "0=- --- -. 1 i ROb6m Rd i-- ^aD6692 Rd 4"8`!C00000269' 92 414•• Parcel..H 921061002 921091015) Seismic Hazard -� 921003006 921002019�a 92.(A4_,,091 .' 921061020 I 921093009 92103018 ■ �ffit093325 9210930/4 ' —.-1— 92W00M �� 32 . 92168306 921981012 ; / 1064012 i�921003022 �-92109302' m 1 h - i 921003024 ll� J ' 9210M001 I i 1 92109192] 901020/66{ // _:.__.--. L 9¢1091617_- 'T 92�11r5(r_O 0 '."`-/ 921/700 k 921100000 1\ klasseateette.eemeeConeCtreeStences08 0 ssmanwesessmoma 109011 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07:19:27 2012 httpa/gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?Servic!Name=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 2/27/2012 . Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 62 911 1061011 092(174-L92i091029 Li_921092017_ 921692018 I 1 emG0098 gm00,333 91,77°°"3i 97,70cm,7770004, 92i0610,5 -1 --1 1_ 977700039 I 972700238 i 921061018921022009 -- --221 921992031 1 021001017 [ tel000m 1 , 1 r me"Rd I' 700341 97770:039 -r I ---_i ' .,„ — I 927700543 977, I 972700044 3.2 I I 977709030 r_ 1 W7700646927708040 -9 I 92Vg7207 I tivonolo ! 7 921092010 , I 021061022------1— L__ --- 1 977700051 ,rt3tecon,977700640 921092082 , - --L.___1 97770004S =I 4210920:L1 921092012 i e W7730061 —1, 977700235 1 1.V__- I 77700:079,,,,, I ----Frit Thal‘..-' 921094035 F 921092077 Y 921092016 ' 1 921004004' (-{-92--;0940- 17 921004031 921094033 , 4 ( 921004010 021004032 1 921004010_Ay, 921014038 --I 92109300,1 021022079 1 921002078 s i 421000013 1 92104030,/, --- 11 921064018 , 921090005 4,921094v45 , 928034017 L-____ ,__ T ..._9210132013 1121063003 i 9280940 3 1 ! 'avow= IL ) Legend z1034203 .;_92100422' . I 921090022 921001021 - Selected Features 921093002 / JC_Roads -.1:2--; 11013 6i16 Rd 77-- ,, Et 1 921094036 921094029 _921094012 / 9210940•,./,7 Parcels-H H I I I I 4093686 9210932 W 1092019 I 9I 2•8'93•0' 2927 10-97 4910 Landslide Hazard 02106939 92,00 92102016 922912• ; ig SINIGS saos3ess 301093014 ' ` "---•"---if 928 // 90 U-,1 92209124.6 921092012 .•1061022 I . I wono22 ,:-92'°"°2' i Madam. q : I '-----fl __ ,-setmovi %NW calossool W1099323 I 922003018 42i 16022: 921170000 161 , 921160000 . / 77 ,....„. IIA Maiseuedaletae0a,a,c4.4treareaStrace044$ 0■wil■11.3711 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07:19:45 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimaP.Esrimap?ServiceNarne=ovmaP&ClientVersion=4.... 2/27/2012 , Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• 92i1006IW11 921092074...:9�2tW2929' _.9219920 921091016-1 9/278604.1 977799931 snTaaRlt 7T000369r7/a001T_ 941099016*21092009 929092091 i 91]1000.94 91)100030 —1 *21091017 — *21090009 _. f7T1000tl 97790009'917100039 901092007 —�~ -_ 9)T 977799099 99e0y Rd 901941000 --.-___-� 921092016 47/2�'� --}F-I- 97rTWMa977 11„ ffitOtl000 I 90/092010 � ", 977700091 70004997770007.: .,•'{I■_ --.....�-- X 977700016' ( 921092011 921091012 1 921091062 - -1 f.L_ 9)7700011 4 --- 7r08666 GO.16 HO --- 97/20.58 _•.Finis Ind 'AbeO qO- { .---- r0.; *21061035 - L9R0920r7 1 C 921010940 ffif09p� X921099031 *210990!3 b 921009036 'J 921094032_ . i .921091010- *2109610 921093009 921092079 i ffi109207a u -1_'! *21094020 !49290930: 90106610 - W II} s292M6448 10 f 921099006 921091025 1� 921064017 I ' 90109301/ i---_il 1-02P . •fON008 1—", 9210831103 1 921091023 ,"�ffi109091--' Legend — 92100.1002 901099022. 921099027 ,—921094021 Selected Features ,— ___ *21099006 911099@9 ,,�.*210990/2 JC noa Js 921064032 'ii ��- 1 My Hd�J0000pp2&7!'9zio9/0tt ' - -'� ■92109401. Pa rce bll 921093019 *21094094 ( 921091006 921002010—11 921094007 Y FEMA FIRMS J 90109.1009 921093016 901fgIpA )*2109]02$ 901091019 '..- -...4!„-..- Y . A 4,.,I 901097006 901003912 __. _-_ 921099016 Aai 1064022 j 921963622 1.901001021 ■ 490 �. .-- �. 093021 m . Qna, 92100.1001 j_ F. 921003023 9_1, 171/ *21160000` *211)0000 /,, 901160000 • • i 1 • FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this ma•is limited b the method and accurac of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07:19:55 2012 • http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?S erviceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 2/27/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 921961911 921091074-.92192 92029 9777020.33 9 t0G201 92t99281a� 9ITT00096 9/7100033 9TrlOC\.58 b1170C93r 921441413 921 16921092009 —_-- 9TT/00009 971100038 ' _� 9210021.1.18 921091041 '• 921081017 092090 'gym "41 V "7 _ i 9777003U 97710097/ 97))00039 91//00044 I 921092001 'men., 921092016 9m009.1 97770904E BTI]00910 ■ Ii I/ .'�i v[!iwnts iL'!wxF4141 Tm>� 97710095 1'1WD5•977 --- 4' 02'094928 •. 9210920117! e Gybe Ho Rd ` 97110905' • t 91'C'tiAn.T 'Akan Rd . ;7 ,�.. 92 iw1C,r• 921092076 x921094001 9110035 i 921094036 if 921094032 9210940,8*�9t 1094976 921002079 921092078 9 yJ - . 921094010• 921931184 _. _W I 921009010 14921094939 921060019 921994005 I 42100015 921e6n 1 __ I at 9210090'1 92,09.90,] ' 921043009 i j 921091023 :�"';0919, Legend 92109102 901094022 921064027 ■ .:',_9210961 Selected Features 921004006 921001029 :.921 i 42,98631 ,,.. _._ bile rdtl T'-- 140988,Rd loomm601 oe 92;09491 JC_ROads I 9219699;99 f 1 192/9401 Parcels Jt @1001039 i 921093089 921002019--- 921094007 ■ Erosion Harard I 92109]809 92103016 921 921919023 021903014 i i _ 1 I .1 921003008 921093012 1 --- 921094026 02108622 i 1 921090022 4--021063°21 i 4q I I 921093024 m 921081001 921000023 I_. 901091018 J _92100301Y__ 921160209 921170000 l` 921160009 • Matt...dott1.M9oo.Coay Cerra SION1073 GS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07:20:11 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 2/27/2012 . Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 921061011:911092074 92+042029' 921 092017 921090618 977700098 977]00013'9";"3397)7 VLVib9!11IX:51fi ] 921081015 '�...�:�.'y _... 92,081016921092009 P�9 �}[! C31: II 4{ai..:i1:r 97770001a iGHiF3Fi/ 1GiliiL ' y .97770009+977700039 92120+017 97710041 977700044fl' 9m00000 977766640 4 7710v77]crti,.w II 921202007 801090010 977700051 977700069977700017. v21081028 4$0.•,•:':.4 977700618 ,t 92'0201f 92+092012 97]7060'1 a�pa1��y�� qN. 977700050 97]'700087917700000 ' GO).lb Rd _ etNi T J3 Wa0 31d S�:al�Yt r08+011 921092077 azta9a3+. 6 921092078 dt.97104101/ 921099031 921094011 l942+0910'6 ,� 921 92+0940'8 '6 2'060096 .911202079 .92+0920]8' '5 921049016 92+0940]00 921011009' r w108t0t8 W' 921091008 9211194026 921094002 ats08a1 r x�cw..!!44L98� •aliiiui060' 921091001. !11111 99221092f t3 J Selected faa8lres 92109002 921094012V JC_Roads ���4y�.r��.P4 •*•+:1a.11�8n1i -Disney Rd '— 0(}9.%10109 921001011 P9rcelsJl vt+061032 . 92100301 092+0940,0 Critical Aquifer Recharge 9210930091. 92102019 ...'91.094007 Areas v2t0840M '.921091009 921090'6' 42'!Yi4XN Gib ZEr- +• r P Cr O Ell 8MP9ue9114C -11064021 9112002E 921013021 I 921091024 66 ❑ 0218 92108100+ ■ YRPA 92t0900f8 91109017 0 84e79.11x0 921100000 9211700, 92 180000 / A Mem vadelq 01e+mCoa9Cete 8el•ra GU^ o®"3720 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this ma•is limited b the method and accurac of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07:20:19 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com r esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 2/27/2012 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 9210610119:21042076 9210920771_1--ancs2017_i 921022016 977700098 4777000))977700012 977700026, 977700037 92txtx6 I� .. 977700036 977700026 921061016921042069 ----- 92109X161 TH 921040006 „_fi -—4 —11 Ale "- 921092010 1-Y 601061017 9Q1 l I 9777000,1; 977700041 7TO0Ms * _ -- 97„OO,DSA _. —I L9,n000a9,,,,a6ae �-.• i 921042007 I r92t022016 1 i0n700261 1 1'977790047.' 921061028- ._--I _ �L_- 927400029 9n799a6 1 921092011 ; 921002012 I 921092082 ay 977700061 9n 3977700066 610611-10 Rd--"'„ ._,._-_T Finis 291: o Moen Rd° .-_ 077700356- �. 92,oea36 921092077 1921092N8 3, 92,02,x, {8.021094017 €92'.04102' 421096032 I ( *210]1016 —" 921091062 92106018 92106600 921042079 , `S --J-------�_! �}}�,9210960]11 921092078 I 90109016 71'92,001x02, 921946x6 {- 92,oe6ma -� -w 921016666 - ,__1,(42151 i fff __921481002 921022017 L. _ 921093911 i. _ , 92109/013 Legend 461061x6 f--1 • 921003902 f 921077102] .921094021 Selected Features l_I 921091402 1121 921294005 921094029 100 921094027 . CI• 902012 6,.J JC_Resds -1---4 32 1 -R960in r90._.�� 0646yRd ipaaperso-'921x4021' Par0616�1 921066x2 I I I 921093015 1 1 1921044010 7 wauscm9da. I 921093006 921022419�1 921094007 i 421066x9 921090009 921x6016 921091000 . 1110«1666 921x3006 921093016 2 921094026 * 961..81100 re 2x0 i 921096005 921021x2 * 200«IJ9M1« 92 i I 921m1022 -L 92104302t S 4 '921x1001 921x6023 921' x016 1 "—_l - i__ ____.9x0610,T.._ At 921160000 921114x4 92/160000 Mss va.ae09y.kb.senGorey Cars Sve mc:s 0■11A4 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07:20:40 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?S erviceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 2/27/2012 • Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 91.99'0:' 41'0920/4 92'1192019 91'1920:1 92:.0320'8 91111:123] 0, 9Ii:'a1R9 911 900}3 91/±19)399 9)1700081 92'18'0•8 9]11(X7078 92/100038 92•08.0•E 42'041009 - 92ti92081 R/ 92.0921X,8 92'CH'0'I 92'02 @0 , ""+04•a•+µ nY Rd wa 977]010,977100019 e' 911/08041 ■ 9/12000449 97/700050 _.. .. v_97770004E 91770/40 92'09100/ 9,'0920'0 92'1n2C'S R 92'06'019 - 9777005: 977]001%9477]0047.' • Aar 91'091092 t:'. 92'0920" 92'0920'2 W 9/112OU5' t 977100065 GYD4 HO Rd ._. 0 9717[00$7 9]]J000rb _ Fm is Trai Allen Rd ..,.,. ,. .- __ .,...:CD 1111.. ,. 92'094019 42'091i1! - 42.010)8 3 ■ 92409/04 !� 92•094017i,€92.19401* 925094071 ''.4 41'!X940:6 g 92.094,," 92'0940'8 92' fb 2 '9 91'094020 91'041079 91'Wit Jtl 42'0830 n '.09 91.0940'8 924030 92'0840'8 w 92'!'4}1:45 91+094015 92'0840'/ __92'194002 92'9987'3 92.093(03 92'0940;1 Legend 91'084[08 91'fNU25 92'094011 92'098302 91'094021 921!94021 Selected FaalNrca y� 91'034048 92'094029 91'046012 JC Roads rttr.. Robhins RO: r 6bne Rd 92''''''*" 91'±4940]2 Y 00[{IIXi2i/i Parcelaa4 92'093015 0 92'094010 Shoreline Slope Stability 92'193)198 91.0920'9 ..:I 91'0940] 92'094039 911fY440i9 91'093]09 92'0930'6 ❑ arab 92.098025 92'0930.4 .... & Fn 5159*2S 92•W8J! 92'0980'2 92'094016 901084012 92:03012 92'09302' S ❑ Om1na . .91'098]24 O4 . fln+.la Ileum Lardai6e 92•084011' 1 9nf16a Q3 tamb6e 92'09302! 91.09}0'8 Naha! ....... 91'0930.1..../ 41"511000 91".MW 02'•000 A Ma"au,ela1,ry..C4M1n,Con.-Caxs.-444 GU G■101041 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07.20:51 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 2/27/2012 , Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 922061021 921042074 921092029L ' 924092017__L 92,0920,8 97771133] 1 1 _ 4!!!0:.0'30 977700033 _-) 977700096 97J70001J 921064015 ) / 971700036 97770003a 42106,016921 W20FJ ...921023000 II 901092061 1 , Merry R0 9210610/7 92'01=0 1 4rr70WW 471977700004 9TIJOOW9 i vnn3nu ■ 921092027 �- -- 021092016 977700050 977700046977700040 91 9920,0—I 1026-- --- 97770005t TJWf%V9777WW7 621092911 1 921092062 1 977700040 �' . `a+ f 92 Y+N22 R 977700052 `977700055 'f 231 966319 R6'�"-- _. 9J71CMST 977T00056\N N., 1 -- --- Fnt6lnfi n Rd _.- 991064036 41 001071 23tfA2076 921096054 ( 92`0940,, €92109903. 921044054 S<{921094016 y 921094052. 921094016 * 92,Jtl9nR 92'092079 3 ,921094020 92169x7s N 40 92'W%W4 m 922099030: 921064016 - — 10 921094005 921001 025 ^�41106101T 1 .922094002 !7_) j 921093013 ! g2,93m3 i'.... 92;094023 9----' uyond 925094009 Y 921000022 92,0'940z7 92'094021 561441d Features t _ 921091002 922pN0064921094029 92.094012 -- �`7190090 Rd �. - , JC_Roe,Y X1066002 ! - I 1 D°n9Y RO 000000250.- 42209402, Parula�l — _f I 921093013 922004020 8102 J 921023002 921092019- 11 921099007 921014039 I 921099009 921000016 924094000 Al Ra469Z [1) 921093025 921093011 1- i —1 I- g 921094026 ■ IIgn ROAPZ \_.1 921043905 9210993012 I Coaalal sroz 071666622 1 921093022 ,1 92,09302, I i-. +--- '—_!'921053924 - 001 li 92100.3029 .. 42400301g 921 921+60WO, 621170000 V \I 921160000 / t ,• Sas 44404340444,4444044s-84144 SelcCilS 2®10002 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07:21:15 2012 7 = _ http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap.ServiceName ovmap&ChentVerslon 4.... 2/27/2012 . Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 977700033 ■1 '11711,8117,r r./91,./id 92 092 fl 92,Y3Y.:,"! 92',X,e0'8 9,7100098 guAyA31 miaow,97Thisa31- -e 8'0•E."2":"92,-,OS , 92,:e.e:tik " rwiemf Rd 2"C..12,..C/ 4.F1 gx,T143 C(Ti ., ..3 47.,703051 977700940177700011, ailli=1111 ‘IIV 1 ,WM.2 C me HU 10 0 . . Finis Trail ranee Rd 92,..92'C'' ,!e,.:,410.,t f .,,,,,,.,,, ,,,,..Z1r0'.' eZ • 92 9210900$e 921000020 ' Legend Selected Features .. _ I ..'Cg..,11:29 9.2101M01 ' JC_Roads Rabbn-22 Parcels.H 1 921, .7, 92'094C07 10M Hillshade ?2'0994209 92',29309 9t.299124 er' c 92'C.,9 YX75 9213911122 e.,..:•54,..,, 912,2992el '11229142' /' rc 92".:9K■2,1 C° I ,c OE'ir . . ,■, -,-. ..../.. 2.0.... . .„, ..,.,,, ... . . . . . . . _ ... 'e •. ' FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07:22:08 2012 http://gisserver/senflet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServieeName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 2/27/2012 • . Map Output Page 1 of 1 / ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 921011071 921110%1 v11-A201v[ - 91092Gx 1.?t42!t192018 I +?IY.It133 / xr. t `t 1 11 91)NW9B 9.)1000]3 9)/200096,,,„ 0031 1 9It0810!s __I _ 5 �,+11� I t f FJ i ! 9777036 v,)0009 1 1 9210810'16 92'11Wa 92112008 Y[ H2O7 m _ t • t 9240940!? 921092010 Y 1 _1110019 r• ; _� ) L f 92?/00015 „ 4 276644 r� i '3??200014 9240921? 4210420/0 � 1 42xcY2046 ���9i2)Otl,,50 � � 6 9]210080 i i ` �i: .921081018 { l \et`�Tra 1.N� 97710005, f• '✓. '%M 9772700046'11 �.' i ; i1 921,,92072 Y 91)2006187/ 1 I 4 w 92'110" 91t1N'II 97IIp005797220185 1, . ? lG �� u._ 92104%VS �� 92'092077 91412096 %��-- 921 . Y 17 �'.i 1 1 c I /r 1 r €92"°9403' 921094033 } $ 921094016 4 4 9z+10012 92149ao1a 9 921088636 `l `92_12019 92"11078 :4.5 �'\ •••.;,.._' 921!091020 921O4 4 1 / / 921091014$95111030 92/084019 �; \\\` \\ f / w 92'110744 _. t V 1,.9210W01s . Point 921081017 1443.1.„ 9.•lxut -... f '�'_r 911o9:1v23 0921091,,3 L pi]p roinL Legend 92108/15 GD A, 4921//02 ® Selected Features •H.'" _ R[�O�y�I'93'1Y.�U[ • +n �92t1W22 921091pMn "9„8492°X.4°`" /i eC� 'y 92'091006 921094029 �i 92109101 1.• JC_ROads 91148409/ . • /2 AeY X 00000/60 '�10910f1 Parcels H // 9211305/ �92t1gpW/ 11565 Topes 91'!9X77 0921 n /921084039 = \ 192 T1 91 53.79 fuL'VY1;'8 hT 92•11025 92'093092 J �i• g I "- 919309 92"1/9802 t 1 9 /92109028 1 92'4022 II 921093022 1'0930?( 1 f '92.eaJU' 92,093021 92+0910 18 ry/ ' f,! .. 0 7 S I s \ 9ztteo9m 92/'70000 `/ •., \�ti 16 ..7' I . � Krrirley Point o ,.ti MsapallpbyJebamCaagCd•e0a.>am818 4-113211 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07:22:18 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 2/27/2012 ' Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• 51092909 977700050 ' 51;1W5.A-1fl 0009)009469PJ/OC1 1 V0 X1'.5` 11,090.0 1 92 092012 ' 9!I 30.449 4 9/119905 1,..199951 9/7/00050 .1J -- Funs Tra9 t-Shen Rd it 91•.0920/6 P ($•592'99°1 f `� I'_91!094031 921099031 92'05103'92:0990te. (?(5j1r:•��;1: `J.'.i. H....., u104N.1J +} 6 —� Lam, .«: w 4 9z.ONO A', 10990]0 CMS j i— _ :ow°• l 92 091,n2. GamY } '0040.1 .f . l ato9a92 r'. •49`.t _ 92.onyx 91 `9415 Legend § C'�+9 921001012 _ ., a Selected Features Rohh R1 —T- — i Disney RA��� rq., '9M' v JC_ROadc 9 1,_ s -� 0 •ParceleN 41"W'+:' ,ry 7011 Aerial Photos -Was�i 1. / s . RI r r r 411031, 10000/ 1 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this ma.is limited b the method and accurac of its collection.Mon Feb 27 07:22:40 2012 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4..•• 2/27/2012 i A a LONG OR SHORT PLAT WITH SEPA REVIEW FORM APPLICATION PRELIMINARY APPROVAL: MLA NUMBER: ►'1(,ikla,--1 91 EXPIRATION DATE: SUB NUMBER: hS ()!So,- I i DATE MAILED: APPLICANT: r YlrG yW1QwiPl.D REP SENTATIVE: / FINAL PLAT APPROVAL (fir i r ry MC fq4- 301 - t 1(03 PLAT CERTIFICATE RECEIVED: N. ME OF''' AT: MAIN. AGREE/EASEMENT: I! ne (•+ ' ; li ,.1 ,/., IL LOT CLOSURES RECEIVED: PLANN R: ��I��e � BLUE LINES RECEIVED: PRE-APPLICATION DATE: BLUE LINES DISTRIBUTED: APPLICATION RECEIVED: �/n/P RED LINE SENT TO SURVEYOR: APPLICATION COMPLETE DA : _ in.. ORIGINAL MYLAR RECEIVED: NOTIFICATION LETTER MAILED: BOCC AGENDA DATE: APPLICATION NOT COMPLETE: RECORDED DATE: REQUEST INFORMAION BY: AFN: INFORMATION RECEIVED: MASTER MAILING LIST SEPA REVIEW , / APOS APP REP SITE INSPECTION DATE: = INTERESTED PARTI�FSeQ Sea, Fi're4- NOTES: ft FIRE DISTRICT: i■ 2 3 4 5 6 V SCHOOL DISTRICT: 20 - • s • :1 50 MAILED: (II PUBLIC WORKS DEPT: ✓ L 'POSTED: 1 ) BY: , c- HEALTH DEPARTMENT. •%T ; - &.PUBLISHED: / Q//a Uff ASSESSORS OFFICE• '000/ PAT P COMMENT E OD /q DAYS IV- CITY OF$ORT TOWN 1 V" FROM: j TO: J /.2,//3 1111• PUD #1V COMMENTS RECEIVED: 0 JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFF: TONY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: JEFFERSON TRANSIT✓ PUBLIC WORKS: or. PORT OF PORT TOWNSENDV ASSESSOR'S: . if WSD OF ECOLOGY, SEPA✓ ❑ WSD OF ECOLOGY, JEFF STEWART THRESHOLD: DS DNS MDNS DK WSD OF FISH & WILDLIFE, OLYMPIA, SEPA MAILED: ❑ WSD OF FISH & WILDLIFE, PORT ANGELES PUBLISHED: ❑ WSD OF FISH& WILDLIFE, WIND POWER COMMENT PERIOD: DAYS WS DNR, OLYMPIA, SEPA FROM: TO: ❑ WS DNR, ROSS GOODWIN COMMENTS RECEIVED: ❑ WS DNR, FORKS HEALTH DEPARTMENT: ❑ WS DOT, SEPA PUBLIC WORKS: LI WS DOT, ART SPORSEEN FINAL: FDS FDNS FMDNS \` DEPT OF ARCHEAOLOGY& HISTORIC PRES✓ DATED: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ✓ END OF APPEAL PERIOD: ❑ LMC COMMITTEE MAILED: 1' BOCCE ,' PORT TOWNSEND LEADER HEARING EXAMINER REVIEW ,t PENINSULA DAILY NEWS HEARING EXAMINER DATE: ❑ WS DEPT OF HEALTH: NOTICE PUBLISHED: ❑ JEFFCOM 911: NOTICE MAILED: t Weft divas - Uide (4 - POSTED: BY: ❑ RECOMMENDATION REC.: ❑ DATE REC. MAILED: SEPA APPEAL TO HEARING EXAMINER: TRIBES DATE OF APPEAL: (X HOH TRIBE, ALEXIS BARRY/ NOTICE MAILED: JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE, L.JENKINS1V POINT NO POINT TREATY COUNCIL,JACKIEV- McLAUGHLIN ./eR.9 Itcga .VARIANCE REQUEST: bZ PORT GAMBLE S'KLAJeLAM TRIBE, YES NO COMPLETED: QUILEUTE NATION�v QUINAULT TRIBE, MARK MOBV A SKOKOMISH TRIBE, KRIS MILLER/RANDY LUMBER SUQUAMISH TRIBE, ALISON O'SULLIVAN✓ G:\PLNCNTR\DRDReviewForms April 2009 IIMMINIMI r , - , , 1 UDC CONSISTENCY REVIEW Pro' 'l. Master#MLA12-00141 Review Type Project Description 1111 I SUB12-00011 I SHORT PLAT-3 PARCELS Primary: MARC MAUNEY TRUSTEE Site Address: ido OP LYNNE ROGERSON TRUSTEE 91 BALDWIN RD 2133 OAK BAY RD NORDLAND WA, 98358 PORT HADLOCK WA 98339-9778 REP TERRY MCHUGH P 0 BOX 441 PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368 Project Location: Parcel number 921 094 026, Lot 1, in Section 9, Township 29, Range 01 East, WM, located on Baldwin Rd,Nordland, WA 98358-9608 Parcel Number: 921094026 S-T-R: 9-29N-01E Total Acreage 34 Legal Description S9 T29 RIE LOT 1 SUBJ TO EASE Land Use: 1100 Flood District: Fire District: 1 Planning Area: 3 Flood Map (FIRM)Panel No: chool D 49 Zoning: COMP PLAN ((�� f� ��j ', DESIGNATION: I�l2i I, I " (? C 1 W COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: UGA Trans [ . Plot plan states "property line" pp Assessor's Map(Property lin on submitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the Assessor's 1/4 map) 4, Legal Access to Prope ® NO y j, Parcel Tags or Scanned P ocuments ii, NO AlgiMAIIILMILTILIC,., '', ESA's: Special Report •arby YES o II W Designated Ag YES , Shoreline Designation: !' NO et/��a/l fit,/ _ Shoreline Slope Stability. NO S/ __ V / Stream Type:YES 0 Fish& Wildlif:i NO -:)/ / , �_,i Wetlands: kip NO 'r� t i ,0 C iftir Rare Plants:YES co � I� • Seismic: r0 f.N )( —\U .l , Landslide: YES NO Flood: YES ea Erosion: YES CO Aquifer Recharge ' re: "° NO .3 !1,' SIPZ: . • • - 4110 High Risk Coastal CMZ: none '•ig Risk Moderate RiskDisconnec ed CMZ Stormwa - • e plan submitted: YesNo Forest Lands: YES NO / Adjoining Forest Lands: Commercial/ Rural/ Inholding [ Mineral Lands: YES Q Agricultural Lands: YES Stormwater: New Impervious Surface Land Disturbing Activity cla' ESA's Stormwater Req's:Min Req#2 Min Req#1 thru#5 Min Req#1 thru#10 Engineering Nei.A Notice Provisions/Disclosure:n •port YES �. MRL YES 0 Forest Lands YES 0 Landscaping Required: Yes dr III► `l Parking Spaces Re. • ed NO 2 Other �- Building Height: UBC Standard law Impervious Surfac- overage percentage: c5-9 D Resource Lands&Public: 10% Rural Residential: 25% Rural Industrial: Per UDC Sec 6.7 Rural Commercial: 60% Area of Building Coverage:60%in Rural Industrial Lands only Total Building (s) Size: RVC:20,000 SF CC: 5,000 SF NC: 7,500 SF GC: 10,000 SF All others:subject to s ptic&water constraints/None specified J Setbacks: Front: Left Side: 5 Right Side: � Rear: / • " F(,01-0R Shoreline Setback: /cF) y- g-f = / PCOtekli. LSHA Setback: , i n I 4)11, Road Classification: IffilIMINIVIEWNIFIREMW=S4107D. i.u. 1 T ICI V Road Approach: EXIS . OT REQ'D RAP C N SEPA Required: Y S Flood Certificate: /it ,. ) ,Existing Case(s) & dition(s): , le,/,(}c-0 Violations: Yes N ,- Recorded Date of'Su division: 0 1171s_ AFN Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions: <5yrs=Plat Conditiorn plat or Old Ordinance /irk Lots/Require Declaration of Restrictiovenant YE CIO s fitted: YES (rl0) UGA No Protest Agreem• . YES O submitted: ESQ v i Site Visit conducted 0 NO 704 Require Final Zoning A s. oval YES NO ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan c, - N/A do New Parcel Tags entered in Permit Plan CIP YES Special Reports Scanne N/ YES No parcel tags found for parc Associated CASES status issued finaled description 921094026 MLA03-00146 SEP03-00064 N DESIGNATE RESERVE AREA ONLY-NO PREVIOUS RECORDS FOUND Home built 1900 SEP03-00063 F 4/25/2003 10/15/2003 EES 4/22/08 MLA03-00147 PRJ03-00059 P ADU W/ATTACHED GARAGE RAP03-00075 F 4/30/2003 1/14/2005 ROAD APPROACH&911 -BALDWIN RD MLA12-00006 ZON12-00002 F 1/31/2012 1/31/2012 CODE INTERPRETATION-Marrowstone Island Subdivision Moratorium and Public Water The code interpretation is not parcel specific. MLA12-00068 SDP12-00018 P SHORELINE EXEMPTION FOR STAIRS TO THE BEACH PRJ12-00049 P STAIRS TO THE BEACH BLD12-00106 P STAIRS TO THE BEACH CSP12-00003 P CRITICAL AREA STEWARDSHIP PLAN FOR STAIRS TO THE BEACH MLA12-00141 SUB12-00011 P / SHORT PLAT-3 PARCELS PRE12-00004 4 3/20/2012 6r/gl/a PRE APPLICATION FOR A THREE LOT SHORT PLAT, MARROWSTONE ISLAND SOM03-00063 F SOM03-00064 N -3L1003-V • DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TIME SHEET Date ,Tp�e Comments ter 02q �� t V M - `xal V 17( 7//c)-- 141.' , i a CIP :a66 .14161-.0-Q. CAr ka re c -ce-)