Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SDP2015-00005
JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TYPE I LAND USE PERMIT SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT EXEMPTION WASHINGTON STATE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT(RCW 90.58) PROPONENT: CLAUDIA EDMONSON PO BOX 1227 PORT HADLOCK WA 98339 DATE ISSUED: May 18, 2015 DATE EXPIRES: May 18, 2016 MLA NUMBER: MLA15-00013 CASE NUMBER:SDP15-00005 PROJECT PLANNER: Anna Bausher PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Shoreline Exemption for maintenence to the existing four feet wide trails at Camp Beausite in order to comply with ADA requirements, which will result in the trails being 8 feet wide paved trails. No further expansion of the existing trails will occur. The existing gravel parking area will also be paved. WATERBODY AND/OR ASSOCIATED WETLANDS: LAKE BEAUSITE PROJECT LOCATION: Parcel Number: 901273004; Site Address: 510 Beausite Lake Road, Chimacum WA 98325; Section: 27, Township: 29N, Range: 1W. FINDINGS: 1.) The Administrator finds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code, all other applicable ordinances and regulations, and is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map. 2.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on March 19, 2015 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code(UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property:fish and wildlife conservation area, non-fish habitat stream, wetlands, and geologically hazardous area. 3.) A Type(5, non-fish bearing)Stream (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area) has been identified on the subject property. The stream will require a buffer of 50-feet. The buffer shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM). Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall also have Buffers and Building Setbacks established. 4.) Wetland and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Buffers are areas that shall be maintained in their natural condition, however, minor pruning or alteration of vegetation may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished. 5.) Jefferson County has determined that the use of real property for agriculture and forestry operations is a high priority and favored use in the county. The county will not consider to be a nuisance those inconveniences or discomforts arising from such operations, if such operations are consistent with commonly accepted best management practices in compliance with local, state, and federal laws. If your real property includes or is within five hundred (500)feet of real property designated as Rural Residential 1:10 or 1:20, Rural Industrial, Rural Commercial, Agriculture, or Forestry, you may be subject to inconveniences or discomforts arising from such farming and forestry operations, including but not limited to noise, tree removal, odors, flies, fumes, dust, smoke, the operation of farm and forestry machinery during any 24-hour period, the storage and disposal or manure, and the application of permitted fertilizers and permitted pesticides. One or more of these inconveniences may occur as a result of agricultural and forestry operations which are in conformance with existing laws and regulations. 6.) Among the native conifer species which may be used in buffers or for re-vegetation include, but are not limited to: Grand Fir(Aibes grandis), Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis), Shore Pine(Pinus contorta), Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), Western Red Cedar(Thuja plicate), and Western Hemlock(Tsuga heterophylla). Among native tree species which may be used includes: Vine Maple(Acer circinatum), Big-Leaf Maple(Acer macrophyllum), Red Alder(Alnus rubra), Pacific Madrone(Arbutus menziesii), Quaking Aspen (Populus tremula), Black Cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa), Bitter Cherry(Prunus emarginata), Oregon White Oak (Quercus garryana), Cascara(Rhamnus purshiana), Pacific Willow(Salix lasiandra), and Scouler's Willow (Salix scouleriana). Among the native shrub species which may be used are: Sevice-Berry(Amalanchier alnifolia), Red Osier Dogwood (Cornus stolonifera)Sala! (Gaultheria shallon), Ocean Spray(Holodiscus discolor), Indian Plum (Oemlaria cerasiformis), Pacific Ninebark(Physocarpus capitus), Red Flowering Currant(Ribes sanguineum), Wild Rose(Rosa nutkana), Swamp Rose(Rosa pisocarpa), Willows (Salix ssp.), Red Elderberry(Sambucus racemosa), Snowberry(Symphoricarpos albus), Evergreen Huckleberry(Vaccinium ovatum), Red Huckleberry (Vaccinium parvifolium). 7.) The applicant is proposing to create or add 1,600 square feet of impervious surface and 1,600 square feet of land disturbing activities. 8.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(3). 9.) The parcel has been designated as Parks, Preserves, and Recreation (PPR) under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 10.) The Development Review Division finds that this proposal is consistent with Shoreline Master Program Section JCC-18.25.560(2)and is consequently exempt from the substantial development permit(SDP)requirements. Exemptions from the substantial development permit requirements do not exempt a proposed development from compliance with the applicable policies and standards of the Shoreline Master Program or other applicable Federal, State, or local permit or license requirements. 11.) The existing trails are part of the approved conditional use permit(MLA06-00045)for Camp Beausite, a camping facility for children and adults with special needs. The exapansion of the trails is required maintenance to comply with ADA requirements. Camp Beausite is determined to be a water oriented, recreational use in the SMP which allows components of the recreational use that are water-dependent to be inside of the shoreline buffer per JCC 18.25.490. 12.) The site plan as submitted with the shoreline exemption permit application on March 3, 2015 and May 15, 2015 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated May 15, 2015 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 13.) This approval is for maintenance of existing trails to be eight foot wide ADA compliant trails, the existing trails and parking area will be paved. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 14.) NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes"listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. Portions of Jefferson County, including marine environments are included as "critical habitat"for listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there - Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches The Federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act requires landowners within 660 feet(1/8th of a mile) of an eagle nest to consult with the US Fish and Wildlife Service. This Eagle Act prohibits anyone from "taking" bald eagles. This federal law defines the term "take"and describes the possible legal consequences when a"take" occurs. Among other actions, "take" includes a disturbance of bald eagles or their habitat. Under federal law a permit may still be required for activities that impact bald eagles or their habitat. Contact the US Fish and Wildlife Service(http://www.fws.gov/pacific/eagle/) to learn more about how this law affects your project. Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species "taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. CONDITIONS: 1.) A Special Report(Habitat Management Plan with wetland rating) prepared by Olympic Wetland Resouces was submitted on March 3, 2015 in conjunction with the application to address the wetlands and mitigation of the development to achieve no net loss of ecosystem functions. The proposed mitigation strategy through a planting plan shall be implemented as discribed in the Habitat Management Plan. 2.) All construction activities, with the exception of the area of approved trail inside of the fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffer and the wetland buffer, shall not encroach upon the 75 foot wetland buffer and 100 foot fish and wildlife habitat conservation buffer. No storage or preparation of materials shall be inside of these buffers. 3.) A setback of 75-feet, measured perpendicularly from the wetland edge, shall be permanently maintained as a buffer. No filling, grading, clearing, or other alteration of the wetland or its buffer is allowed, with the exception of the existing permitted section of trail within the buffer. 4.) Buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred (100)feet,whichever is less. Signs shall contain the following statement: "Wetland & Buffer-Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 5.) A permanent physical separation along the upland boundary of the wetland buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation can include installing logs, trees, a hedgerow, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 6.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 7.) A Stormwater Polution Prevention Plan has been submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan. 8.) The development shall be essentially the same as the original in location, size, configuration, and external appearance. 9.) Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program other than as described above shall receive separate review from the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 10.) Substantial progress towards completion of the project shall be performed within two years of the issuance of the permit. 11.) All lumber and other materials treated with preservative shall be sufficiently cured to minimize leaching into the water or shore bed, in accordance with the Best Management Practices approved by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 12.) This project involves widening and paving the existing trail system on the property. The site plan shows the existing septic system is not impacted by this proposed pavement. Any paved area over any portion of the septic system must be reviewed and approved by the environmental health department prior to work commencing. CK1 ; ! .-- SClr`2U/.3" Department of Community Development Staff c: Department of Ecology, Shorelands Office, Rick Mraz Washington State Department of Fish &Wildlife, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Bridget Kaminski-Richardson \\tidemark\data\forms\F_SDP_Exemption_U.rpt 5/18/2015 n cn �■�...• -II', 0D. Jo v n t-.0 FP '-.1 D a 5 5 m ^ w x N -I *.. o. a- 5 cn cn5 5' o' -1n o�+ v5 o - t g c .,] N p w O .N. a N O al u R 0 0 - c O 0 p N Z). v) ]-y N N 0 N -Ni rn w g i _ 3 d H N 76. a Fi;0-, y w 5n d ,v I rH!'r l< ry D,,?, .y � � s R -• N p n y � m. o rD o IV D U v=^, Q 1p b N G L N N C w S j R w n O .,.ii 1-1 ,5J' �{ N 5 b O N W VI N ¢v ?wC J N " � u O .,• d IU �� H N 71 (4 N 4, v n. Y g. 2 w .. 5 w Q'1 N a O N o 24.. 40 c, ut 9 N '" .T] N -t i co y uo P- :. V] v_I n b•O v° '3 ? Cr,W f i) (l7'.. w v 'N u a`N y - c n w E w 7 m �! _n ru (� w.w '�' Non .'T y.4447 m 3- 0 n 2 a =h a o n fU °ai K A -n .i u �A W C °' a d` as.o ry w ° N a o ° Q. a " vmwm -,,� / ' w 5' 0 w w. N �' co N �' lU s O „' eY J T Cl 11 N fD-I y ❑ 5 " N iU !TIU 0 SnQa NP_--ln uP iu oD O. ov a n w :I-. ; 0 njP � nm� "��-x ry w m $ =. o 0 ,aro Ic o rh�m N4.4!�1, a .a N p r rm� ' n y .. ( m a 8 :/. .2 d' W,D .li, N� 1 ,_''�•/ 0OA D n O `� �0g ?.iu v R 0. 0 vwi-<° ° N w Q "" - U J• ro .1>fn') ---1 d II1 al ni . \ �j'w JJ m II X) S ,ijiijtti ^ ,N, i .� lI N , ='• W .P f /` !N , J l�N w o. CV y S 7 O v O n, ?,� O O 'qai ,\.^.' '', ,{ry n (�-� ' A (� w 0 3 N o a w w w �' 'O w /' .IN w Q O R c N -„W '3 O a V O n 5 w. l)I ( 1 I %_. '/ O N ` 3 I w n M V Iw V' i O n w Vl H 0- 5 'd to w N �..� / a)",:), 'I r CJ a o rf`° .� Fn n 5.O nc m w C <., i / pf - _. _ _. r� _ i u CD P N a c, f-', 5 2 e < - a os .o Ifo 17 o - a ;o tii �tro to, w w!^ a S o w .. w w v �]. y w 3 ❑ a w '" g- Z N a G .■ rt a o Wo �-//i i' `o;t, o N ., p' r w 0 N '"! .' w 5 _ c 5 n .' v - o i i/ r/ , , i. iu C Pi' .o N 0 cs o N b 0 .o .+l'w o a n ? 'J ,'... .. I //; __.... ,� ci v � F te ---. J f O o a Q . : //r n f-' O 'O N 9, y nN . G d N as a ` •AI T :W N T/A H . n o 0 N o N M 5 c M p N D / A A ^ _ _ � i,O ° S 9 P. N I D b N w , Q " N o a rro y h • n. a T s. -- — ,9 I6l Axrirm E. . 84", = s,,,, , „m O _1 Z Z C I. ; V ,... A I-I- CU (j _m I-I r-) -__G .__— Ul N Z 0 .O d '�2 l Il W a ro _cam. _ S ._._._ f m > \ /Sl a U S � o _� 9 x S, C7 // gt 9j, 1, '.1) £ �7 / fx \. .1\' 1� U A . Y "h am•„ Q f ID I �C° J Y ' .____..__. ___ (t, ` ' 1 e. 4,.. r. rU.0 r P O X 1{'.' UI P X '1 N c...) r\r 3 H. < (? I' '. Vl 1' ' 3 n A 0 '4. CO C SOX 1n - I) l fi � Qrh W z Q,.' \\ � 3 Q 0 . _O (0 / r CS) J ..-\,■ �1 P::.11, F y1 fi /' rot CI / ,� , C3,, / / fPl uNi ar r y, / / /' c �/� o �� T ro N y� 1/:/ rU M // i/., , /1 // ///'://// 0 Cl -7 tri \‘'.1 \ 7=Q ";r:,',)(r'‘tr'r,''''' p cD .'o // // //COO 1`I `G I, / / / _..� „--' // ;/ V 7 , N -5 RECORD DRAWING ci lncw s� Property Owner: NW Kiwanis Parcel A S 901—'273-004 ..64,p4.1,, Designer: Jerry Jacobs Date Inspected: 07/16/2009 . Installer: — Owner (Kiwanis Volunteer) Permit SEP#: 2008-00075 . /1 r -'�— MAR 3 2015 j 5 J 5 1 �a�: EXISTING 1000 Y u` "-NT � - GALLON GREASE TRAP ,,,i 3 le, ,sm - mr. c -I i N Xik \ -J 54 ' ' y EXISTING i 500 GALLON A/G Q� PROPANE TANK \j 0�td/ SAND FILTER (\q" KJD ./1 155 FRS EAST PERLY LINE e X XISTING HQ EXISTING 2000 BUILDING PARKING GALLON PUMP CHA BER / EXISTING 1250 RESTROOM „--CLEAN OUT(S) GALLON SEPTIC TANK FACILITY --------,—,■41ip EXISTING GALLON SEPTIC TANK Ain EXISTING SEASONAL CREEK DRIVEWAY-,-- PARKING EXISTING DRIVEWAY ic NG APPROVED RN SITE PLAN IR HAY .1.._5.--2015 2U6 'L JEFFERSON e Y I DEPT.OF C• • ITY DEVELOPMENT BEAUSITE ��4 LAKE ROAD o �='�. :44 _ Q Cr NIL415 - X4013 jr� �T , I certify the information heron was verified by inspection and the �'� � ' ,. r- .tl system installation appears to have been completed in accordance r�•% ! I, with the approved design except for the changes made during .11.-.0.��.v .10~.. installation as noted above and on the reverse. EXP S 1r v Y' 7/17(M Designers Stamp and Signature: �� • �4go 45ox co G� JEFFERSON COUNTY K DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ::,: 621 Sheridan Street I Port Townsend,WA 98368 i Web:www.co.iefferson.waus!lcommunitydevelopment TeL 360.379.44501 Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcd(ico.iefferson.wa.us Building Permits&inspections j Development Consistency Review)Long Range Planning 1 Watershed Stewardship Resource Center Master Permit Application MLA: Project Description(include separate e sheets as necessary): 5'17)arj'e. ex,54.th, t'/ I✓btr15/s'e0+ Si otr.I Iowa ahr. pAre par11,,nr', G(v cj 5o01, o Tax Parcel Number: ,,, ;; ,, _ - t ,/iii- r W 4-Property Size: '52_ 4..c/f5 , (acres/square feet) ho✓5 t Site Address and/or Directions to Property: k/(11) fe't4'4Oh 2-7 Parcel l 3e"f,6ti 28 Pee./ 5/U lgCo. Js , /e Lk , 'd. Cl°;,y,a , J-,,, LI 1 9 '325 _ Property Owner(s)of Record: -,ie-reer-s ct h Cd. ' "k 5 199,71, Telephone: 3 0 - 732 -7 2Z Fax: email: :41- rurmr bectuS, rIW,...0 t..4 Mailing Address: I�,C . R Q X Iz27 Pori' // ty,/4 9'R'3 3 / ApplicanVAgent(if different from owner): C.McA r/e 5 5 J.___-_ / g Telephone: 3G0-$0y`073 / Fax:_ email: re +rtcQCo/��Phtfo�, Mailing Address: 5.2.. S. 0 i f L Gt✓d r h, ei s �: �3 - 7 What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies ❑Lot or Road Segregation ❑Building R_Cntical Areas Stewardship Plan (S\ ❑ Demolition Permit • ❑Variance(Minor,Major or Reasonable Economic Use) ❑Single Family ❑Garage Attached/Detached ❑Conditional Use[C(a), C(d),or c]** • '— ❑ Manufactured Home ❑ Modular El Discretionary"D"or Unnam r,�� i rt Il \ 9 re---, Commercial* ❑Special Use(Essential Publ li r �`_/ [-, U °y I S� ❑ Change of Use ❑Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Address ❑ Road Approach ❑Short Plat** ❑ El Home Allowed UYes'sUse Consiste❑ncoAnalysis ust ❑Planed Ru Rural Residential is ' • MAR 3 2015 Cottage Industry Binding ** I - C7 Propane ❑Long Plat** . i i ❑Sin C]Planned Rural Residential devielopment(PRRD)/Amendments* � Consistency Stormwater Management J Shoreline Master Program Exemptioli/Pernlit Revisions,"Y n Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)* D'Shoreiine rvtanagument Substantial Development`* ,•r ;t_'OPMtNT L• ) i ❑Temporary Use ❑Shoreline Management Variance ' 0- ❑Wireless Telecommunication* ❑Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment ❑ Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium Li Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment May require a Pre-Application Conference ❑Tree Vegetation Request **Requires a Pre-Application Conference i I Please Identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal, if known: _ _f a,bi /ad" /M`Iahr^tem�nf- ,Plufrk_,DESIGNATION wake Ma Ale e.,eh�--, ,,lro•-el,'„ P 1=x�n,�of_.o._ •I hereby designate i : ey .,�to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s).?Al 03. OWNER SIGNATURE _ _ _ ate: By signing this application foam,the owner/agent attests that the information provided herein,and in any attachments.is rue and correct to the best of his,her or its knowledge. Any material falsehood cr any omission of a material tact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agredto save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attorneys fees and , expenses which may in any way accrue agai.-st J€`ferson Co'-uit•/as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. Staffs access arc right of entry will be assumed unless the applicant informs the County in writing at the time of the application t� e or she• ants prior no e. /�.. Signature: -- — — ---- Date: „ The action or actions Applicant will undertake as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take”of an endangered species as ihoae terms are defined in the federal law known as the 1 "Endangered Species Act"or'ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual.group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson Count;development code Tne Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-transferable res ability fo adhering• ur ,umpivi c:.with the ESA The Applicant-gas read this disclaimer d signs and dates it below. Signature: q ___-__. Date:__ /13___ • I I1I BUILDER STATEMENT , . MAR — 3 ?fry • The signer of this statement does hereby certify that they are the Owners of the parcel referenced herein,that they are not licensed contractors and tf at-- they will be assuming the responsibility cf the General Contractor for the proposed project. • Signature: Date: r'? GENERAL CONTRACTOR OR MANUFACTURED HOME INSTALLER: PHONE: FAX: -wk/cQe in 4f 0, ilf; CS rN c (7lbd 4/52'.7%0) (3th '{j p-.' �MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL: CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE - - - ) - , )+6)b2 WAINS•NUMBER: L44< j f`7Lif,4 0 NUMBER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: PHONE ( ) FAX:( ) MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL Project Type: Frame Type: Bathrooms: Shoreline: Type of Sewage Disposal: New )( Wood Existing: ____k_ Sewer Addition Steel Proposed: Bank Community System Alteration/Remodel Concrete Total: G, Height: kIndividual System Repair Masonry 0 SEP Permit# r- /q -_. Demolition Other: I Bedrooms: Water Supply: Existing: S Setback: K private well Two Party Type of Heat: Proposed: Public Total: 3 Name of System: If this is a Commercial Project you must answer the following: Number of Parking Spaces: Current: ,SC) Proposed: Number ofADA Parking Spaces: Number of occupants(includes owners,tenants,employees,etc) Current Proposed IBC Occupancy: IBC Type of construction: Will you have Food Service? Yes / No If this Is a Propane Tank an nce Installation permit,mark all items below that apply: Underground Tank (Above ground tank Size of Propane Tank: rJOO Heat Stove Cook Stove o stove Fireplace.nsert rehtO evotS telleP t knaT retaWtoH Is this appliance being installed in a Manufactured/Mobile Home? Yes / No When applying for a permit to install a propane tank you must also submit a site plan showing all of the buildings,all property lines,tank location and size,distances from the propane tank to all property lines,buildings and septic system components, including the reserve area. Square Footage Current Proposed For Office Use Only Amount Revision Main Floor Heated EH Bld App Review: UJ 23 VI_ Loo 2"tl Floor Heated _ Consistency Review: ay 00 Other Heated Base fee: ShpreL', Exemo, 5 Tx,-a..3 Mezzanine won: Heated Basement . Plan Check fee: 0 Unheated Basement State Surcharge fee: 4- co Other Unheated Pot Water Review fee: • Garage/Carport SUBTOTAL Decks 911/Rd Approach fee. , ^ Other TOTAL: $ A 0P4 •(}V Receipt Number: /54/15 Cash/Check Number: 50.25- • ESTIMATED COST(REQUIRED) Date: �O/S .Fair market value of all labor and materials foundation to finish v rD t°1c.0 eed .iG�Q ^ Initials: • 07/24/2013 - � ON -co. JEFFERSON COUNTY D CragVL`= /,:j -.,-,, A, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APR 2 R 2916 3 '",� 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend • Washington 98368 JEFFERSON COUNTY qS. KA.) 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax DEFT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOWEN` _. http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ Stormwater Calculation Worksheet y� /} MLA# u"A L � ' S - 0�1� PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: ��'� 1 I,C,Q(,SI L� DETERMINING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS: This stormwater calculation worksheet should be completed first to classify the proposal as"small,""medium," or"large." The size determines whether a Stormwater Site Plan is required in conjunction with a stand-alone stormwater management permit application, building permit application, or other land use approval application that involves stormwater review. The basic information will also be helpful for completing a Stormwater Site Plan, if required. PARCEL SIZE(I.E., SITE) Size of parcel S S acres An acre contains 43,560 square feet. Multiply the acreage by this figure.•Size of parcel in square feet 2..'" q s O 0 Osq/ft Land-disturbing activity is any activity that results in movement of earth, or a change in the existing soil cover (both vegetative and non-vegetative) and/or the existing soil topography. Land disturbing activities include, but are not limited to clearing, grading, filling, excavation, and compaction associated with stabilization of structures and road construction. Native vegetation is vegetation comprised on plant species, other than noxious weeds, that are indigenous to the coastal region of the Pacific Northwest and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur on the site. Examples include species such as Douglas fir,western hemlock, western red cedar, alder, big-leaf maple, and vine maple; shrubs such as willow, elderberry, salmonberry, and salal: herbaceous plants such as sword fern, foam flower, and fireweed. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY,CONVERSION OF NATIVE VEGETATION, AND VOLUME OF CUT/FILL Calculate the total area to be cleared, graded,filled, Answer the following two questions related to excavated, and/or compacted for proposed development conversion of native vegetation: project. Include in this calculation the area to be cleared for: Does the project convert%acres or more of Construction site for structures sq/ft native vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas? Drainfield, septic tank,etc. sq/ft Circle: Yes No Well,utilities, etc. sq/ft Does the project convert 2'/z acres or more of 1 C native vegetation to pasture? Driveway, parking, roads,etc. C) sq/ft Circle: Yes No Lawn, landscaping, etc. sq/ft Other compacted surface, etc. sq/ft Indicate Total Volumes of Proposed: Total Land Disturbance I (D b O sq/ft Cut 3 Fill (cu/yd) [over] Impervious surface is a hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle as under natural conditions flt prior to development. A hard surface area which causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to roof thit kips, walkways, patios, driveways, parking lots or storage areas. concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads, packed earthen materials, Li d oiled, macadam or other surfaces which similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. Fw}be• STORMWATER CALULATIONS–IMPERVIOUS SURFACE NEW EXISTING Structures(all roof area) sq/ft Structures (all roof area) `7/1 2 LI 43 sq/ft Sidewalks sq/ft Sidewalks sq/ft Patios sq/ft Patios sq/ft Solid Decks sq/ft Solid Decks sq/ft (without infiltration below) // (without infiltration below) Driveway, parking, roads, etc l CO ®0 sq/ft Driveway, parking, roads, etc (4-1 d� sq/ft Other sq/ft Other /' sq/ft Total New I ( t�C' _sq/ft Total Existing (O q SS sq/ft TOTAL NEW+TOTAL EXISTING* i 2– S S S sq/ft *This amount will be used BY STAFF to check total lot coverage. The following questions will help determine whether the proposed project is considered development or redevelopment. DEVELOPMENT v. REDEVELOPMENT Divide the total existing impervious surface above by the size of the parcel and convert to a percentage: °A) Does the site have 35%or more of existing impervious surface? Circle: Yes N FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS: If the answer is yes, the proposal is considered redevelopment and the attached Figure 2 should be used to determine the applicable Minimum Requirements. If the answer is no, the proposal is considered new development and the attached Figure 1 should be used. At this juncture, the applicant should refer to the applicable Flow Chart to determine the Minimum Requirements for stormwater management. DCD staff will help verify the classification of the project and the application requirements. For proponents of "small" projects who must comply only with Minimum Requirement #2—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention—an additional submittal is not required. The proponent is responsible for employing the 12 Elements to control erosion and prevent sediment and other pollutants from leaving the site during the construction phase of the project. Pick up the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet. Proponents of"medium" projects—those that must meet only Minimum Requirements #1 through #5—and for "large" projects—those that must meet all 10 Minimum Requirements—are required to submit a Stormwater Site Plan. DCD has prepared a submittal template of a Stormwater Site Plan, principally for rural residential projects. Complete the template in the Stormwater Site Plan Instructions and Submittal Template or prepare a Stormwater Site Plan using the step-by-step guidance in the Stormwater Management Manual. APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Stormwater Calculation Worksheet, I as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners®of the affected property. (LANDOWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SMALL MEDIUM_ LARGE__ REDEVELOPMENT Stormwater Site Plan: Yes No stormwater colt worksheet Rev 9-9-2010—REV 9/9/2019 Camp Beausite Northwest Habitat Management Plan 510 Lake Beausite Road Chimacum, WA 98325 September 2014 E \ r+r.A _ 3 9n1 C' FT y ii PT! Y t=. Prepared for: Claudia Edmonson P.O. Box 1227 Port Hadlock, WA 98339 \ e kr `"' "`"" `` Olympic Wetland Resources 856 50th Street Port Townsend, Washington 98368 360 385-6432 dixie @cablespeed.com ■ • Camp Beausite Northwest Habitat Management Plan September 2014 Table of Contents Introduction and History Methodology Wetland Categorization and Buffer Assessment Existing Conditions Landscape Setting and Watershed Context Vegetation Priority Habitat and Species (Fish, Wildlife. Rare and Endangered Plants) Proposed Project Wetland and Buffer Impact Assessment Compensatory Mitigation Mitigation Strategy Mitigation Goals and Objectives Monitoring Schedule and Site Management Performance Standards Contingency Plan Limitations References Appendix Sheet #1 Location, Critical Areas, PHS, & Aerial Map Sheet 42 Critical Areas Buffer, Trail Impacts, and Paving Plan Sheet #3 Photographs of Existing Trail Landscape Specifications DOE Wetland Rating Form WDFW Nest Boxes for Birds (Optional) Camp Beausite Northwest Habitat Management Plan September 2014 Introduction and History At the request of Claudia Edmondson and Chuck Standley from Kiwanis organization, Olympic Wetland Resources (OWR) has prepared this Habitat Management Plan (HMP) to identify potential impacts where trails at Camp Beausite Northwest will be expanded within mapped critical areas. There will be no new trails, only the upgrading of existing trails to meet ADA requirements. The 4-foot packed gravel will be widened and paved to 8 feet to accommodate the passage of wheelchairs. Under the new Shoreline Master Plan (2/2014),the current upgrade proposal is within shoreline jurisdictions and environmental designation is Conservancy. A wetland delineation and assessment was conducted June 1995 by Patrick McGraner(Jefferson County Critical Areas Technician) and Dixie Llewellin(Olympic Wetland Resources). The delineation was required for the approval of a Special Use Permit/Zoning Application (ZON95-0016). At that time the Kiwanis Club of Port Townsend proposed to build a comprehensive camping facility at Beausite Lake for disabled children and adults. The property is owned by Jefferson County but managed by the Northwest Kiwanis Camp (now Camp Beausite Northwest). A Customer Assistance Meeting(CAM)with a form was completed (05/21/2014 Parcel#901 273 004). Camp Beausite NW currently has an Approved Conditional Use Permit as a camping facility for disabled persons (MLA06-00045). It was determined that a HMP would be required to assess potential critical area impacts. The main goal of this HMP is to guarantee a No Net Loss to the ecological functions, and no degradation of wetland or shoreline buffer values before or after the project is complete. Methodology Methodology for this HMP follows standards outlined in Jefferson County Unified Development Code (UDC) and includes the following references and documents: 18.22 Critical Areas (March 2008), 18.22.2270, FWHCAs 18.22.440 HMP 18.25 Shoreline Mater Program (February 2014). Recreation 18.25.490 (3)(a and i) Beausite Lake Wetland Delineation Report(June 1995).McGraner and OWR WA State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington (DOE. 2006 Publication 404-06-025 or as amended) Wetland Mitigation in Washington State, Developing Mitigation Plans. Part I and 2 (Version 1. 2006) Ecology Publication 4006-06-0011b or as amended. Priority Habitat Species (PHS). WA Department of Fish and Wildlife (internet and county data base) Wetland Categorization and Buffer Assessment During the original delineation in 1995 all wetlands associated with Beausite Lake were automatically described as Category I wetlands. This was attributed to their complexity, biological diversity,relative pristine condition and presence of an endangered species (bald eagle). There were also past records of Camp Beausite Northwest Habitat Management Plan Page 1 Olympic Wetland Resources September 2014 priority species identified on site which include wood ducks and band-tailed pigeons. The DOE rating system has undergone major revisions since 1995. Wetlands associated with Beausite Lake were rated applying the current Washington State Department of Ecology's Wetland Rating System for Western Washington (DOE 2006). Wetlands . now qualify as Category II wetlands due to numeric total of 55 points: Water Quality Function (22 points), Water Hydrologic Functions (6 points), and Habitat Functions (27 points). The wetlands unit was rated according to the Lake-Fringe Hydromorphic Class and is included in Appendix. In Jefferson County buffer width assigned to Category II wetlands depends on their location in the landscape, final scores for water quality, and/or habitat functions. The project is assessed according to land use intensity; Jefferson County considers trails to be "low impact land use" therefore, the buffer width for this wetland will be 75 feet. Buffers assigned to Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area will be calculated at 100 feet from the OHW mark of Beausite Lake using Jefferson County UDC Table 18.22.270(2) Natural Ponds and Lakes. Eagles are known to have nests along the perimeter of the lake but they are no longer on the threatened and endangered species list(See Priority Habitat Species below). Existing Conditions Existing conditions in the vicinity of the project have been historically altered by mowing and development. The topography around Beausite Lake is relatively flat, rising slightly to trail location. There are two home sites on the south and east ends of the lake, one is a home site and the other is now the headquarters for the camp and is referred to as the Lodge. Other outbuildings include restroom facilities and several temporary structures. The majority of the lake perimeter is densely vegetated with native trees, shrubs, and emergent plant communities. This healthy cover provides excellent corridors shelter, and habitat links to other nearby critical areas. Existing site conditions and critical area maps are included in the Appendix (Sheet#1 Location, Critical Areas, PHS, and Aerial Maps, Sheet #2 Critical Area Buffers, Trail Impacts and Paving Plan, and Sheet#3 Photographs of Existing Trail). Landscape Setting and Watershed Context As per past reports, Beausite Lake is approximately 15 acres in size and lies within a small basin that is estimated to be less than one square mile. The lake contains four classes of associated wetlands: 1) open water/aquatic beds; 2) emergent; 3) scrub-shrub; and 4) forested. The wetland in the vicinity of the trails qualifies as a scrub-shrub wetland. There is a small seasonal overflow channel on the southeast corner of the lake that acts as a high water outflow during storm periods, eventually emptying to Chimacum Creek. It was completely dry during this August assessment. A criterion for lake designation is 20 acres or more of open water(definitions SMP); however, according to a conversation (9/4/2014) with Colleen Zmolek, Jefferson County DCD Beausite Lake is identified as a Shoreline of the State and a Natural Conservation Area. Vegetation Vegetation adjacent to the trail is dominated by non-native pasture grasses, and invasive shrubs include Scots' broom. There have been many work parties at Beausite Lake to attempt to control this species. In the wetland vegetation consists of native Nootka rose, spirea, and salmonberry with a few Camp Beausite Northwest Habitat Management Plan Page 2 Olympic Wetland Resources September 2014 patches of reed canarygrass. The nearby edge of the lake has a healthy emergent vegetation layer. It is outside of the scope of this project to include a complete vegetation survey. Below is a list of species identified near the proposed trail expansion: Scientific Name Common name Status Layer Vegetation Adjacent to the proposed Trail Acer circinatum Vine maple FAC- Shrub Agrostis gigantea(A.albat Redtop FAC Grass Circium arvense Canada thistle FACU+ Herb Cytisus scoparius Scots'broom NI Shrub Dactvlis glomerata Orchard-grass FACU Grass Festuca arundinacea Tall fescue FAC- Grass Holcus lanatus Velvetgrass FAC Grass Hypochaeris radicata Hairy cat's-ear NI I Herb Plantago lanceolata English plantain FAC Herb Rubus ursinus Trailing blackberry FACU Shrub Rumux crispus Curly dock FACW I lerb Priority Habitat and Specks (Fish, Wildlife, Rare and Endangered Plants The site of the trails and expansions are not indicated within polygons mapped as Priority Habitat Areas for Sensitive Species (Internet PHS, WA Department of Fish and Wildlife). The Map is included on Sheet 1,11 in the Appendix. Priority species include bald eagles; however, they on no longer federally listed on the threatened and endangered species list due to the remarkable population rebound (June 28, 2007). There are no endangered plants in the vicinity of the project. Proposed Project The proposed project includes paving existing driveways behind the camp building and expanding existing trails from 4 feet to 8 feet. This will enable two wheelchairs to pass. as per ADA requirements. There will be no new trails in or near the wetland buffer. Approximately 880 linear feet of trail will be expanded this: is 1600 SQFT of new impervious surface (4 SQFT per linear foot). Wetland and Buffer Impact Assessment The majority of trail and driveway will be outside trail buffer restrictions. There will be no impacts to buffers south or west of the Lodge. The majority of the buffer crossing will be to the north and northeast. Approximately 140 linear feet of the trail lies within the 100' FWHCAs buffer measured from the OHWM of Lake Beausite. Of that, 40 feet cross the 75-foot wetland buffer. This is along the southern portion of the trail that terminates at the bridge over the seasonal outflow channel. Impacts are calculated as 4 SQFT per linear foot; therefore. 560 SQFT will be mitigated as outlined below. Compensatory Mitigation Mitigation requirements have been prepared to meet the standards described in the DOE, Guidance on Wetland Mitigation in Washington State (2006 with updates). Through this Mitigation Plan, buffer will be re-established in an area equal to or larger than those altered. Mitigation will more than adequately compensate for proposed alterations of the critical Camp Beausite Northwest Habitat Management Plan Page 3 Olympic Wetland Resources September 2014 o areas. Existing wetland buffer conditions are extremely degraded from their natural condition and have little or no structural or habitat value. Mitigated areas will, over time, far exceed existing ecological functions. Mitigation Strategy Impacts to Beausite Lake buffers will be minimal; however to complete the trails to ADA standards, buffer impacts are unavoidable. No Net Loss of shoreline ecological function will follow the mitigation strategy outlined in this report. The degraded shoreline will, over time have additional habitat features, and through the planting plan selected buffers will be restored. All work on the trail will be during low rainfall months to avoid sedimentation. • Impacts to the 100' FWHCAs buffers, which include the 75' wetland buffers, will be mitigated by planting 36 native trees and shrubs (see chart below). • The trail will be non-motorized therefore non-pollutant-generating. • No new trails will be constructed; existing trails will be upgraded to meet ADA standards. • Noxious weeds will be controlled, including reed canarygrass, Himalayan blackberry, and Scot's broom. • Birdhouses will be installed within the buffer for additional habitat. Included in the Appendix is a recommendation from WDFW for birdhouse dimensions (OPTIONAL). • Due diligence, careful trail construction, and planting will follow Best Management Practices (UDC 18.22.590). Species have been chosen that should adapt easily to site conditions and facilitate ease of maintenance. They WILL need watering and weeding for the first 3 to 5 years to survive. Plants should be planted in natural groupings along the lake side of the trail. Over time the area will have more structural diversity and habitat value. Cam Beausite Northwest Pare Cummon Name Size Spacing Quantity Type Acer circinatum Vine maple I 1-2 gal r 4' to 5" 8 Shrub Berberis aquifoliurn Shiny Oregon grape 1-2 gal 3' 15 Shrub Pinus contorta , Shore pine 2 gal 10' 8 Tree Psudotsuga menzesii Douglas fir 1-2 gal 10' 5 Tree Total Number of Plants 36 Legend Scientific and common names: Scientific name according to Hitchcock and Conquist(1976) Flora or the Pacific Northwest Size:As typically planted for restoration projects. Spacing: Recommended spacings. Quantity: Total number of plants for project. Vegetation planting density is calculated at 20 to 25 SQFT per shrub and 80 to 100 SQFT per tree. For this project to accommodate 560 SQFT of buffer loss, 36 to 40 shrubs should be planted to achieve this density. Camp Beausite Northwest Habitat Management Plan Page 4 Olympic Wetland Resources September 2014 } Mitigation Goals and Objective The goals and objectives for the Camp Beausite Northwest project are: • No Net Loss of shoreline ecological functions or buffer impact: • Long-term environmental improvement through improving vegetation structural layers and diversifying structural layers with native trees and shrubs; • Mitigate critical area buffer impacts with a 1:1 replacement ratio (560 SQFT of impact with over 600 SQFT of replacement vegetation); • Guarantee the success of the project through the maintenance and irrigation of planted species from 3 to 5 years until established; • Document compliance with the Mitigation Plan after construction and plantings are complete and assure performance standards are met through volunteer annual monitoring. Monitoring Schedule and Site Management Annual monitoring will determine plant survivorship, species density, and general condition of planted species. This information will determine whether plant survivorship and percent aerial cover of vegetation are sufficient to meet the performance standards. All monitoring will be conducted by a professional biologist and will determine replacement ratios. Below is a recommended Monitoring and Maintenance Schedule: Monitoring and Maintenance Schedule (SAMPLE) 'Mitigation Plan Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Maintenance Planting Irrigation Replace plants as needed Performance Standards Monitoring will determine whether the performance standards identified in this HMP are met. The proposed length of time for mitigation compliance is five years. This time period will allow for the planted and volunteer species to become established. Enhancement will be considered successful if the wetland and buffer plantings meet the following criteria: • Survivorship of installed tree and shrub species is expected to be 100% after the first growing season. All plants that do not survive the first year should be replanted. • Survivorship of installed tree and shrub species is expected to be 80% from year 2 through year 5. Species will be replanted until the monitoring period is complete. • This Mitigation Plan is considered successful if 80% or greater of desirable cover is achieved and the plants are healthy and vigorous during the fifth year of monitoring. Desirable species also include volunteer native trees and shrubs. • No more than 10% invasive species should be present at any time during the monitoring process. Non-desirable species include Scot's broom, Himalayan blackberry, and reed canarygrass. Camp Beausite Northwest Habitat Manuuement Plan Page 5 Olympic Wetland Resources September 2014 Contingency Plan The purpose of the contingency plan is to evaluate available alternatives if monitoring indicates that the project goal and objectives have not been achieved. Contingency plans will vary, depending upon which goals have not been met, and will apply to each specific mitigation area and activity. Appropriate corrective action will be recommended after the first year of the monitoring process and will include the following: • Replanting of any dead vegetation in the first year and additional replanting if density goals are not met over the following four years; • Increased maintenance, which may include additional watering and/or weeding; • Additional years of mitigation and/or monitoring may be required if the performance standards are not met. Limitations The final authority over approval of this Camp Beausite Northwest HMP will be Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Jurisdictional authority over critical areas and shorelines rests with the local, state and federal agencies. A clearing and grading plan will be submitted by Kiwanis organization. If there are further questions or planning requirements for this project, please do not hesitate to call. Dixie Llewellin Principal Biologist, Olympic Wetland Resources Certified for Wetland Delineation, WTI, 1994 Certified for Wetland Rating and Soil Analysis DOE, 2010, 2014 ®_ Camp Beausite Northwest Habitat Management Plan Page 6 Olympic Wetland Resources September 2014 References Brinson, M., August 1993. A Hydrogeomorphic Classifications for Wetlands. U.S Army Corps of Engineers, Wetland Research Program. Buckingham, et al., 1995. Flora of the Olympic Peninsula. Northwest Interpretive Association and the Washington Native Plant Society, Seattle, Wash. Cooke, Sarah Spear, 1997. A Field Guide to the Common Wetland Plants of Western Washington and Northwest Oregon. Seattle Audubon Society, Seattle, Wash. Corps (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2012 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valley, and Coast Region. Version 2. Wetlands Regulatory Assistance Program. May 2010 ERDC/EL TR-10-3 Cowardin, L.M.V. Carter, F.C.Goblet. and E.T. LaRoe, 1979. Classification of Wetland and Deep Water Habitats of the U.S. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. Hitchcock and Cronquist, 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation, 1987. Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. July 1994 update. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service. Jefferson County Unified Development Code. March 2008. Critical Areas revision and Shoreline Master Plan February 2014. Hruby, T. 2004. Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington-Revised. August 2004. Ecology publication number 04-06-025. Olympia. Wash. Leonard, William P., 1993. Amphibians of Washington and Oregon. Seattle Audubon Series. MacBeth. Div. of Kollmorgen Instruments Corp.. 1992. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Mitsch and Gosselink. 1993. Wetlands. NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service). 2010. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States- A Guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils. Version 7.0,2012. Pojar, Mackinnon, 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Reed, Porter, 1988. National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands, Region 9. 2014. Washington State Department of Ecology, April 2006. Wetland Mitigation in Washington State, Publications #006-06-001 lb. Washington State Department of Ecology, March 1997. Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual, #96-94. Washington State Department of Ecology, August 2004. Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington,Revised #04-06-025. U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1994. Keys to Soil Taxonomy. Pocahontas Press. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1975. Soil Survey of Jefferson County. WDFW(Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2012 Priority Habitats and Species online mapping. http://www.wdfw.wa.gov/mapping/phs/ Additional Websites: Fish and Wildlife Service, NWI,http://wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/wtlnds/launch.html Jefferson County Critical Areas Maps, http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/idms/mapserver.shtml National Resource Conservation Service, http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/ t , T T Ie:Location, Critical Areas, PHS, &Aerial Mat Scale: Sheet Olympic Wetland Resources Camp Beausite Northwest As Indicated k: 510 Lake Beausite Road 856 50th Street Chimacum, WA 98325 Date: Port Townsend,WA 98368 #1 ° 3603856432 Client Claudia Edmonson September 2014 \ dixie@cabIespeed.cam P.O. Box 1227 Jab#: Port Hadlock, WA 98339 i� 2014-0819 Parcel #901 273 004 S27 T29N R1 W TORO! map printed on 05/08/02 from"Puget.tpo"and"Untitled.tpg" 122°42'00"W 122°33'00"W WGSO4122°17'00"w Beausite Lake Approximate Trail Location r 2 •tat Kamen taz - s . ° (. fort Tern ‘1.1,r ..!teenbank - 1 o tool ` +.r, ��1Y. ` ° let . I ‘, `Pr e .yxe Z , 9 o ti, i *=( . o .:i; i a V *t Shing- +. r- r eu ' s. ! i v `.. "� yTam « 511: ' rin,tn, / "404 t` ,5•• 1 `} j. .. . . VI —1; 7 A�. viii o — i 11 1 �� � { C jam +.-...+...,..._� '\ _ „, ,. "e- . W. 7 41#1/0S `, ` Mapped Critical Areas 122°42'00"W 122°33'00"W WGSe4 122 01700"W TN�F/MN 0 5 10 lS miW Green is Wetland t9• I .♦ . .s . . l .s . . . . , . I 0 S 10 75 20 2S km Fluted(km TOPO!01999 Walowee Pmarctun(WWI.t,po.com) I r w,. • al.. ,t, . wun 90,x, Priority Habitat Sensitive Species Eagle Nest Along Beausite Lake ',am- ',..... Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife .-.... ..._• -. 2013 Aerial Showing Existing Trails To Be Widened f-- Title:Critical Areas Buffer,Trail Impacts and Paving Plan Scale: Sheet " Olympic Wetland Resources Camp Beausite Northwest As Indicated 510 Lake Beausite Road 856 50th Street Chimacum,WA 98325 Dale: PortTownsend,WA 98366 September 2014 #2 ii ' `a 360 385-6432 Client Claudia Edmonson P f dixie@cablespeed.com P.O. Box 1227 Job#: II Port Hadlock, WA 98339 2014-0819 Parcel#901 273 004 S27 T29N R1 W Wetland Edge Mapped in 1995 (Flags still present) -4-- 75' Wetland Buffer4-- 100''14 - FWHCA's Buffer ill tilt 44 Mae . .. 0.9.39.°.° ...w 2013 Aerial Showing Existing Trails To Be Widened 0 160' 6 w lr4 Wel I I, 4 - t , t Only Existing Trails Will Be Paved Increasing Width From 4'to 8' Title Photographs of Existing Trail Scale: Sheet 1 ,x olympicWetland Resarces Camp Beausite Northwest As Indicated 510 Lake Beaus' Road 85650th street Chimacum, WA 98325 Date: Pal Townsend,WA 98368 #3 3603856432 Client: Claudia Edmonson September 2014 dixie(cablespeed.can P.O. Box 1227 Job k Port Hadlock, WA 98339 2014-0819 ' Parcel 4901 273 004 S27 T29N R1W t. . . :f ,,� .y-- Trail to Bridge-65' From Delineated Edge Trail to Upper Level r y:4 Beausite Lake In Distance Edge of Proposed Trail 85' From Delineated Edge Trail To Retain Vine Maples II Camp Beausite Northwest Scientific Name Common Name Size Spacing Quantity Acer circinatum Vine maple , gal 4' to 5' 8 Berberis aquifolium Shiny Oregon grape 1-2 gal 3' 15 Pinus contorta Shore pines 2 gal 10' 8 Psudotsuga menzesii Douglas fir 1-2 gal _ 10' 5 Total Number of Plants 36 Legend Scientific and common names: Scientific name according to Hitchcock and Conquist(1976) Flora of the Pacific Northwest Size: As typically planted for restoration projects. Spacing: Recommended spacings. Quantity: Total number of plants for project. Native Plant Nurseries Fourth Corner Nurseries, 3057 E. Bakerview Road. Bellingham WA 98226 (360) 734-0079 Sound Native Plants. P.O. Box 7505, Olympia, WA 98507 (360) 943-7026 Woodbrook Nursery, 1620 59th Ave., Gig Harbor WA 98335 (206) 265-6271 Wetland name or number WETLAND RATING FORM—WESTERN WASHINGTON • Version 2-Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users Name of wetland(if known): LE3itiS Ere LAIL-6— Date of site visit: ] r4frs7 q',, 2.—DI Rated by,1)14E Trained by Ecology? YessLNo Date of training mA/2-Lif 2-C1LT-7 SEC:]TWNSHP: ZARNGE: 1W Is S/T/R in Appendix D? Yes No Map of wetland unit: Figure_ Estimated size SUMMARY OF RATING Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland I 11 III IV Score for Water Quality Functions n4 Category I=Score>=70 01'1' Category II=Score 51-69 Score for Hydrologic Functions / Category III=Score 30-50 Score for Habitat Functions Category IV=Score<30 TOTAL score for Functions zs'7 Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland •I_ II_ Does not Apply_ Final Category(choose the"highest"category front above) 77 Summary of basic information about the %etland unit "= has Special Wetland HGM Class t,ra •_§ S used for Rating Estuarine Depressional Natural Heritage Wetland Riverine Bog Lake-fringe Mature Forest Slope Old Growth Forest Flats Coastal Lagoon Freshwater Tidal Interdunal None of the above Check if unit has multiple ❑ HGM classes present Wetland Rating Form—western Washington 2 August 2004 version 2 Wetland name or number L • Lake-fringe Wetlands Points WATER-QUALITY FUNCTIONS - Indicators that the wetland unit functions to 'o" ''s=ore ix,box) improve water qualitS L L 1.Does the wetland unit have the potential to improve water quality? (see p.59) L L 1.1 Average width of vegetation along the lakeshore(use polygons of Cowardin classes): Figure Vegetation is more than 33ft(10m)wide points=6 Vegetation is more than 16(5m)wide and<33ft points=3 Vegetation is more than 6ft(2m)wide and<16 ft points= 1 Vegetation is less than 6 ft wide points=0 Map of Cowardin classes with widths marked _ L L 1.2 Characteristics of the vegetation in the wetland: choose the appropriate description Figure that results in the highest points,and do not include any open water in your estimate of coverage. The herbaceous plants can be either the dominant form or as an understory in a shrub or forest community. These are not Cowardin classes. Area of Cover is total cover in the unit, but it can be in patches. NOTE:Herbaceous does not include aquatic bed Cover of herbaceous plants is>90%of the vegetated area points=6 • Cover of herbaceous plants is>2/3 of the vegetated area points=4 Cover of herbaceous plants is>1/3 of the vegetated area points=3 Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed or herbaceous covers >2/3 unit points=3 Other vegetation that is not aquatic bed in> 1/3 vegetated area points= 1 Aquatic bed vegetation and open water cover>2/3 of the unit points=0 Map with polygons of different vegetation types _ _ L Add the points in the boxes above L L 2.Does the wetland have the opportunity to improve water quality? (see p.61) Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in the lake water,or polluted surface water flowing through the unit to the lake. Note which of the following conditions provide the sources ofpollutants. A unit may have pollutants coming from several sources, but any single source would qualify as opportunity. — Wetland is along the shores of a lake or reservoir that does not meet water quality standards — Grazing in the wetland or within 150ft — Polluted water discharges to wetland along upland edge 1- Tilled fields or orchards within 150 feet of wetland multiplier Residential or urban areas are within 150 ft of wetland Parks with grassy areas that are maintained,ballfields,golf courses (all within 150 ft.of lake shore) — Power boats with gasoline or diesel engines use the lake Other multiplier is 2 NO multiplier is 1 L TOTAL-Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from L1 by L2 a Add score to table on p. I Comments Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington 9 August 2004 Version 2 Wetland name or number Lake-fringe Wetlands Points H1 DROLO(TIC IVNC'TIONS - indicators that the wetland unit functions to t°"'`"' Orr box) reduce shoreline erosion „ = . L L 3. Does the wetland unit have the potential to reduce shoreline erosion? (see p.62) L L 3 Distance along shore and average width of Cowardin classes along the lakeshore(do Figure__ not include aquatic bed):(choose the highest scoring description that matches conditions in the wetland) >'/.of distance is shrubs or forest at least 33 ft(10m)wide points=6 >'/.of distance is shrubs or forest at least 6 ft.(2 m)wide points=4 >''/ distance is shrubs or forest at least 33 ft(10m)wide points=4 Vegetation is at least 6 ft(2m)wide (any type except aquatic bed) points=2 Vegetation is less than 6 ft(2m)wide(any type except aquatic bed) points=0 Aerial .hoto or ma.with Cowardin v station classes _ L Record the points from the box above L L 4.Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to reduce erosion? (see p.63) Are there features along the shore that will be impacted if the shoreline erodes? Note which of the following conditions apply. — There are human structures and activities along the upland edge of the wetland (buildings,fields)that can be damaged by erosion. -- There are undisturbed natural resources along the upland edge of the wetland(e.g. Mature forests other wetlands)than can be damaged by shoreline erosion — Other multiplier YES multiplier is 2 i ) multiplier is I L TOTAL -Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from L 3 by L 4 Add score to table on.p. I Comments Wetland Rating Form-Western Washington 10 August 2004 Version 2 r , Wetland name or number t , v• s � =trlrY s'a.r ,e : Tl ' �` « r ,. . 7 ''�' Ir , d'. ':C Y� 7 ; v.. s1. !nit' c x as FF 1. Does the wetland unit have the potential to provide habitat for many species? H 1.1 Vegetation structure(seep. 72) Figure Check the types of vegetation classes present(as defined by Cowardin)-Size threshold for each class is '4 acre or more than 10%of the area if unit is smaller than 2.5 acres. )( Aquatic bed Emergent plants .--Scrub/shrub(areas where shrubs have>30%cover) 4-Forested(areas where trees have>30%cover) If the unit has a forested class check if )4The forested class has 3 out of 5 strata(canopy,sub-canopy,shrubs,herbaceous, moss/ground-cover)that each cover 20%within the forested polygon Add the number of vegetation structures that qualify. If you have: 4 structures or more points=4 Map of cowattgn vegitabon cresols 3 structures points=2 2 structures points= 1 I structure points=0 H 1.2.Hvdroperiods(seep. 73) Figure Check the types of water regimes(hydroperiods)present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10%of the wetland or''4 acre to count. (see text for • descriptions of hydroperiods) Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present points=3 .Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present points=2 - Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present point= I Saturated only 1 type present points=0 Permanently flowing stream or river in,or adjacent to,the wetland X Seasonally flowing stream in,or adjacent to,the wetland Lake fringe wetland =2 points Freshwater tidal wetland=2 points Map of hydroperiods H 1.3.Richness of Plant Species(see p. 75) Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2. (different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold) You do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian Milfoil, reed canarygrass,purple loosestrife, Canadian Thistle If you counted: > 19 species points=2 List species below if you want to: 5- 19 species points= 1 <5 species points=0 Total for page 1 Wetland Rating Form-Western Washington 13 August 2004 Version 2 Wetland name or number H 1.4.Interspersion of habitats(see p. 76) Figure Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation classes(described in H 1.1),or the classes and unvegetated areas(can include open water or mudflats)is high,medium, low,'or none. CD None=0 points Low— I point Moderate=2 points 9"J F ; t k-i �- [riparian braided channels] High =3 points NOTE:If you have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water the rating is always"high". Use map of Cowardin vegetation Basses H 1.5.Special Habitat Features: (see p. 77) Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the t// number of points you put into the next column. 54 Large,downed,woody debris within the wetland(>4in.diameter and 6 ft long). Standing snags(diameter at the bottom>4 inches)in the wetland Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft(2m)and/or overhanging vegetation extends at least 3.3 ft(Im)over a stream(or ditch)in,or contiguous with the unit,for at least 33 ft (lOm) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (>30degree slope)OR signs of recent beaver activity are present(cut shrubs or trees that 3 have not yet turned grey/brown) )• At least''/.acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated(structures for egg-laying by amphibians) Invasive plants cover less than 25%of the wetland area in each stratum of plants NOTE: The 20%stated in early printings of the manual on page 78 is an error. H 1.TOTAL Score- potential for providing habitat 1 1 Add the scoresfromHI.I, HI.2, HI.3, H1.4, HI.5 L_....__J Comments Wetland Rating Form—Western Washington 14 - August 2004 Version 2 af. Y 'a'4' Wetland name or number H 2.Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species? H 2.1 Buffers (see p.80) Figure Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland unit. The highest scoring criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating.See text for definition of "undisturbed." — 100 m(330ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water >95% of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively undisturbed also means no-grazing,no landscaping,no daily human use) Points=5 — 100 m(330 ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water > f� 50% circumference. Points=4 — 50 m(170ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water>95% circumference. Points=4 • — 100 m(330ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water>25% circumference,. Points=3 — 50 m(170ft)of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas,rocky areas,or open water for> 50%circumference. Points=3 If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above — No paved areas(except paved trails)or buildings within 25 m(80ft)of wetland>95% circumference. Light to moderate grazing,or lawns are OK. Points=2 — No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for>50%circumference. Light to moderate grazing,or lawns are OK. Points=2 — Heavy grazing its buffer.- Points=1 -- Vegetated buffers are<2m wide(6.6ft)for more than 95%of the circumference(e.g.tilled fields,paving,basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points=0. — Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points=1 Aerial photo showing buffers H 2.2 Corridors and Connections(seep.81) H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland)that is at least 150 ft wide,has at least 30%cover of shrubs,forest or native undisturbed prairie,that connects to estuaries,other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors,heavily used gravel roads,paved roack are considered breaks in the corridor). points (go to H 2.3) t a go to H 2.2.2 H 2.2.2 Is the land part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor (either riparian or upland)that is at least 50ft wide,has at least 30%cover of shrubs or forest,and connects to estuaries,other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25 acres in size? OR a Lake-fringe wetland,if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in the question above? YES=2 points (go to H 2.3) NO=H 2.2.3 H 2.2.3 Is the wetland: within 5 mi(8km)of a brackish or salt water estuary OR within 3 mi of a large field or pasture(>40 acres)OR within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres? YES= 1 point NO=0 points 1 Total for page e) Wetland Rating Form-Western Washington 15 August 2004 Version 2 Wetland name or number H 2.3 Near or adjacent to other nriority habitats listed by WDFW(seep. 82) Which of the following priority habitats are within 330ft(100m)of the wetland unit?NOTE:the connections do not have to be relatively undisturbed. These are DFW definitions. Check with your local DFW biologist if there are any questions. Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. _Aspen Stands:Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.8 ha(2 acres). _Cliffs:Greater than 7.6 m(25 ft)high,and occurring below 5000 ft. _Old-growth forests:(Old-growth west of Cascade crest)Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings;with at least 20 trees/ha(8 trees/acre)>81 cm(32 in)dbh or>200 years of age. T—Mature forests: Stands with average diameters-exceeding 53 cm(21 in)dbh;crown cover may be less that 100%;crown cover may be less that 100%;decay,decadence,numbers of snags,and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old- growth;80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. _Prairies: Relatively undisturbed areas(as indicated by dominance of native plants)where grasses and/or forbs form the natural climax plant community. _Talus:Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15-2.0 m(0.5-6.5 ft), composed of basalt,andesite,and/or sedimentary rock,including riprap slides and mine tailings.May be associated with cliffs. Caves:A naturally occurring cavity,recess,void,or system of interconnected passages N. Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component of the stand is 25%. >-Urban Natural Open Space:A priority species resides within or is adjacent to the open space and uses it for breeding and/or regular feeding;and/or the open space functions as a corridor connecting other priority habitats,especially those that would otherwise be • isolated;and/or the open space is an isolated remnant of natural habitat larger than 4 ha(10 acres)and is surrounded by urban development. Estuary/Estuary-like:Deepwater tidal habitats and adjacent tidal wetlands,usually semi- enclosed by land but with open,partly obstructed or sporadic access to the open ocean,and in which ocean water isat least occasionally diluted by freshwater runoff from the land. The salinity may be periodically increased above that of the open ocean by evaporation. Along some low-energy coastlines there is appreciable dilution of sea water.Estuarine habitat extends upstream and landward to where ocean-derived salts measure less than 0.5ppt.during the period of average annual low flow.Includes both estuaries and lagoons. Marine/Estuarine Shorelines: Shorelines include the intertidal and subtidal zones of beaches,and may also include the backshore and adjacent components of the terrestrial landscape(e.g.,cliffs,snags,mature trees,dunes,meadows)that are important to shoreline associated fish and wildlife and that contribute to shoreline function(e.g.,sand/rock/log recruitment,nutrient contribution,erosion control). If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats=4 points If wetland has 2 priority habitats=3 points If wetland has I priority habitat=1 point No habitats=0 points Note.'All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list. Nearby wetlands are addressed in question H 2.4) Wetland Rating Form-Western Washington 16 August 2004 Version 2 rj Wetland name or number H 2.4 Wetland Landscape(choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland that best fits)(see p.84) There are at least 3 other wetlands within Vz mile,and the connections between them are relatively undisturbed(light grazing between wetlands OK,as is lake shore with some boating,but connections shouldNOT be bisected by paved roads,fill,fields,or other i development.' points=5 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe S wetlands within Y3 mile points=5 There are at least 3 other wetlands within V:mile,BUT the connections between them are 3 8 disturbed points=3 The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe wetland within Yz mile points=3 There is at least 1 wetland within V2 mile. points=2 3 There are no wetlands within'/z mile. points=0 —1 H 2.TOTAL Score- opportunity for providing habitat Add the scores from H2.1,H2.2,H2.3,H2.4 I_____ . , TOTAL for H 1 from page 14 Total Score for Habitat Functions —add the points for H 1,H 2 and record the result on • Wetland Rating Form-Western Washington 17 August 2004 Version 2 n I. Nest Box Specifics (See "Woodworking Projects for Wildlife"for construction directions) Floor of Depth of Entrance Size of Height Aove Above Species Cavity Cavity Floor Entrance Ground Suggestion for Placement (inches) (inches) (inches) (inches) (feet) American Kestrel 8 x 8 12-15 9-12 3 10-30 j In open areas near fields or watery areas. Barn Owl 10 x 18 15-18 0-4 6 12-18 Near buildings, barns or open fields. Chickadees 4 x 4 9 7 1 1/8 * 4-15 In wooded areas or old orchards, prefer rustic houses. Downy Woodpecker 4 x 4 9 1 '/4 5-15 Open wooded areas on dead trees,pack with wood shavings. Flicker 7 x 7 16-18 14-16 2 1/2 6-30 Open wooded areas on dead trees,pack with wood shavings. Hairy Woodpecker F 6 x 6 9-12 1 1 !/, 12-20 Open wooded areas on dead trees,pack with wood shavings. Nuthatches i 4 x 4 9 � 1 1/8 * 5-15 In wooded areas or old orchards,prefer rustic houses. Purple Martin 6 x 6 2 '/a 10-20 Use a colony of houses together with pond or stream nearby. Robin 6 x 8 8 NA NA 6-15 In shaded parts of trees or under eaves of house or shed. Screech Owl 8 x 8 15-18 9-12 3 10-30 Open wooded areas on dead trees. Tree Swallow 5 x 5 6-8 4-6 1 '/4 4-15 _trees. 2-3 boxes together on a post or dead tree near water. Violet-green 5 x 5 6 4-6 7 1 1/4 10-15 Place under eave of house. Swallow Western Bluebird 8 6 1 % 5-10 In open sunlit areas on fence posts or trees. Wood Duck 1 12 x 12 22 I 17 31/2 - 4 10-20 Place facing water; add four inches of wood shavings. Wrens 4 x 4 6-8 6 1-1 1/8 4-10 j In any partly sunny spot goz~r Co D v. JEFFERSON COUNTY (� ��PR 2°s^205 " � DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend •Washington 98368 JEFFERSON COUNTY �� O$ (360) 379-4450 — (360) 379-4451 Fax _DIPT.OF COMEIROSUNITY DEVEIOPM€M RING http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopmenU Stormwater Site Plan Instructions and Submittal Template "Medium" and "Large" Projects [Includes Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and Permanent Stormwater Control Plan] The submittal template for a Stormwater Site Plan has been developed from information presented in the Department of Ecology 2012 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (Manual), which is the set of stormwater management standards for new development and redevelopment in Jefferson County. ' The Stormwater Site Plan, Minimum Requirement #1 in the Manual, is the comprehensive report containing all of the technical information and analysis necessary to evaluate a proposed new development or redevelopment for compliance with stormwater j requirements. A Stormwater Site Plan is required for all "medium" and "large" projects. (For background q q 9 information, refer to the Stormwater Management Information Sheet.) The Stormwater Site Plan includes a Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP — Minimum Requirement #2) that addresses sediment and erosion control during construction and a Permanent Stormwater Control Plan that addresses stormwater on the project site in its developed condition through dispersion, infiltration, or, if necessary, flow control and/or treatment facilities. The steps for preparing and the content of a Stormwater Site Plan are summarized below and more fully described in Chapter 3 of Volume I of the Manual. The attached submittal template is intended to be a format applicable to typical rural residential construction. For these cases, completion and submittal of the template results in a complete land use application. THE TWO MAIN COMPONENTS OF A STORMWATER SITE PLAN I. Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan A Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is a document that describes the potential for pollution problems on a construction project and which explains and illustrates the measures to be taken to control these problems. The basis for requiring a SWPPP, the twelve elements required to be in a SWPPP, the suggested step-by step procedure to follow, and the suggested Best Management Practices (BMPs) to follow, are all described in Volume II of the Manual. A SWPPP consists of two sections, a narrative and the drawings. A description of the contents of the narrative and the drawings sections, and checklists for each of these sections, are in Section 3.3 of Volume II. For typical rural residential projects, DCD provides a Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet to assist with the preparation of the Construction SWPPP. II. Permanent Stormwater Control Plan A Permanent Stormwater Control Plan is a document that describes the basis for, and the means of implementing, permanent Best Management Practices (BMPs)for flow control and treatment facilities after the project is completed. The content of a Permanent Stormwater Control Plan is described in Section 3.1.5 of Volume I of the Manual. The permanent BMPs and facilities for flow control and treatment are described in Volumes Ill, IV, and V of the Manual. The submittal template is intended for rural residential projects that can fully disperse or infiltrate stormwater. The template may not be appropriate or sufficient for applications involving larger or more complex projects. MLA15-00013 stormwater site plan template—rev.4/27/2015 1 . , f INSTRUCTIONS To prepare a Stormwater Site Plan,follow the steps outlined below, complete the Stormwater Site Plan template, sign and submit together with the Master Land Use Application (MLA). This information may also be provided on other diagrams, plans, studies, or attachments submitted with the project application. If so, please indicate such on this supplemental permit application. As the template is designed mostly for rural residential development, it may not be as useful for a larger project as an independently prepared Stormwater Site Plan. For any particular project, the Administrator may waive specific submittal requirements determined to be unnecessary for review of the application. Note: Prior to filling out the submittal template, read through these steps for preparing a Stormwater Site Plan. Preliminary or draft versions of the individual components may be helpful in the case that redesigning an original layout would result in a proposal that has less environmental impacts and is significantly simpler in terms of meeting stormwater requirements. For example, if the proposal can utilize the "full dispersion"BMP(T5.30 in the Manual), there is no need to provide for flow control or flow treatment on the site. For more information on the easiest way to meet stormwater requirements, refer to the "Low Impact Development"Information Sheet. BMPs used during the construction phase and that are included in the Construction SWPPP may also be useful as elements of the Permanent Stormwater Control Plan. STEP 1: COLLECT AND ANALYZE INFORMATION ON EXISTING CONDITIONS Collect and review information on existing site conditions, including topography, drainage patterns, soils, ground cover, critical areas, adjacent areas, existing development, existing stormwater facilities. The Jefferson County website provides an Internet Map Server (IMS)function (http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us). If available,a Development Review Division(DRD)planner may be able to assist you in collecting this information. Analyze the information to determine site limitations,including: • Areas with high potential for erosion and sediment deposition(based on soil properties,slope,etc.); • Locations of sensitive and critical areas (e.g., vegetative buffers,wetlands, steep slopes, floodplains, geologically hazardous areas,streams,susceptible aquifer recharge areas,etc.);and • The natural receiving waters to which the stormwater runoff either directly or eventually discharges. This information will be useful in site design and in the completion of the Permanent Stormwater Control Plan and Construction SWPPP. STEP 2: PREPARE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT LAYOUT Based upon the analysis of existing site conditions,locate the buildings,driveways, roads, parking lots,and landscaping features for the proposed development. Consider the following points when laying out the site: • Fit development to the terrain to minimize land disturbance; confine construction activities to the least area necessary and away from critical areas; • Preserve areas with natural vegetation(especially forested areas)as much as possible; • On sites with a mix of soil types, locate impervious areas over less permeable soil (e.g., till) and try to restrict development over more porous soils(e.g.,outwash); • Cluster buildings together; • Minimize impervious areas;and • Maintain and utilize the natural drainage patterns. The preliminary development layout will assist in determining threshold discharge areas for calculating whether size thresholds under Minimum Requirements#6, #7, and#8 (for'large" projects)are exceeded and as a basis for the drawings and maps required for the Stormwater Site Plan. MLA15-00013 stormwater site plan template—rev.4/27/2015 2 • STEP 3: PERFORM AN OFF-SITE ANALYSIS This step is for "large" projects (i.e., adding 5,000 square feet or more of new impervious surface, converting '/4 acres of pervious surfaces to lawn or landscaped areas, or converting 2 ''A acres of forested area to pasture)at the discretion of the UDC Administrator. See Volume I,Section 2.6.2 for more information. STEP 4: REVIEW THE APPLICABLE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS The Stormwater Calculation Worksheet is a required submittal for all development and redevelopment land use applications. Completing the Worksheet helps determine the broad category of the proposal—"small," "medium," or "large" project—and the applicable Minimum Requirements. "Small" projects need to meet Minimum Requirement #2 only. "Medium" projects need to meet Minimum Requirements #1 through #5. "Large" projects need to meet all the Minimum Requirements, #1 through #9. The Minimum Requirements are as follows: 1. Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans(Chapter 3 of Manual) 6. Runoff Treatment 2. Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention 7. Flow Control 3. Source Control of Pollution 8. Wetlands Protection 4. Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls 9. Operations and Maintenance 5. On-site Stormwater Management The Manual provides descriptions and instructions in Volume I,Chapter 2. Information sheets,application materials,and DRD planners can help describe the Minimum Requirements to applicants. Note: "Large" projects, as part of meeting Minimum Requirements #6 – Runoff Treatment – and #7 – Flow Control, are compared to Volume I, Chapter 2 in the Manual to determine whether on-site stormwater management BMPs are sufficient or treatment facilities or flow control facilities are required. The flow control determination may necessitate use of the Western Washington Hydrology Model managed by the Department of Ecology. Consult Sections 2.5.6 and 2.5.7 of Volume I, Chapter 2 of the Manual for more information. Again, the easiest way to meet stormwater requirements is to design the project so that natural drainage is preserved, impervious surface is limited, and full dispersion (BMP T5.30) is implemented. By using "low impact development" techniques in the site design, the need for treatment and flow control facilities is eliminated, simplifying preparation of the Stormwater Site Plan and often the site construction process itself. For more information on these techniques,consult the"Low Impact Development"Information Sheet. STEP 5: PREPARE A PERMANENT STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN Select stormwater control BMPs and facilities that will serve the project site in its developed condition. The selection process is presented in Volume I, Chapter 4. After consideration is given to how selected BMPs and facilities fit within and serve the entire preliminary development layout, the designer may want to reconsider the site layout to reduce the need for construction of facilities or the size of the facilities by reducing the amount of impervious surfaces created and increasing the areas to be left undisturbed. The Permanent Stormwater Control Plan should contain the following sections(Section 3.1.5 of Volume I, Chapter 3): • Existing Site Hydrology(i.e.,the behavior of water on the site—above, below,and on the ground) • Developed Site Hydrology (special requirements for projects and threshold discharge areas within projects that requirement treatment and flow facilities) • Performance Standards and Goals • Flow Control System • Water Quality System • Conveyance System Analysis and Design Essentially, in terms of site hydrology, the developed condition of the site should match the pre-developed condition, with is forested land cover (unless reasonable, historic information is provided that indicates the site was prairie prior to settlement). For `large" projects, totals of impervious surfaces, pollution-generating impervious surfaces, and pollution generating pervious surfaces must be tabulated for each threshold discharge area for which on-site BMPs are the sole stormwater management approach. MLA15-00013 stormwater site plan template—rev.4/2712015 3 STEP 6: PREPARE A CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) The Construction SWPPP for projects adding or replacing 2,000 square feet of impervious surface or more or clearing 7,000 square feet or more (i.e., "medium" or "large" projects), must contain sufficient information to demonstrate to the UDC Administrator that the potential pollution problems have been adequately addressed for the proposed project. An adequate Construction SWPPP includes a narrative and drawings. The narrative is a written statement to explain and justify the pollution prevention decisions made for a particular project. The narrative contains concise information concerning existing site conditions, construction schedules, and other pertinent items that are not contained on the drawings. The drawings and notes describe where and when the various BMPs should be installed, the performance the BMPs are expected to achieve, and actions to be taken if the performance goals are not achieved. There are 13 Elements that must be considered in the development of a Construction SWPPP, unless site conditions render that element unnecessary and the exemption from that element is clearly justified in the narrative. The 13 Elements cover the general water quality protection strategies for limiting site impacts during construction and are described in detail in Section 2.5.2, Volume I of the Manual. The 13 Elements of Minimum Requirement#2,Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention,are: 1. Mark Clearing Limits 6. Protect Slopes 11. Maintain BMPs 2. Establish Construction Access 7. Protect Drain Inlets 12. Manage the Project 3. Control Flow Rates 8. Stabilize Channels and Outlets 13. Protect Low Impact Development 4. Install Sediment Controls 9. Control Pollutants BMP's 5. Stabilize Soils 10.Control De-watering For ease of use, the Stormwater Site Plan submittal template below includes a section that lists the 13 Elements and provides the opportunity to include sufficient information for rural residential and other relatively simple Construction SWPPPs. For more complex projects,a separate narrative and set of plans may be preferred or required. Volume II of the Manual is dedicated to Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention. A step-by-step BMP selection process and a complete description of the BMPs applicable to each element is provided in Chapters 3 and 4. Additionally, DCD provides a Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet that summarizes the 12 Elements and excerpts from the Manual sample sediment and erosion control measures for typical rural residential development. The Packet should prove useful for completing the Construction SWPPP component of the submittal template. On construction sites that infiltrate all stormwater runoff,the primary consideration in the preparation of the Construction SWPPP is the protection of the infiltration facilities from fine sediments during the construction phase and protection of ground water from other pollutants. On construction sites that discharge to surface water, the primary consideration in the preparation of the Construction SWPPP is compliance with the State Water Quality Standards. The step-by-step procedure outlined in Volume II, Section 3.2 is recommended for the development of these Construction SWPPPs. STEP 7: COMPLETE THE STORMWATER SITE PLAN The Stormwater Site Plan encompasses the entire submittal to Jefferson County in conjunction with a land use or building permit application. The following documents or sections should be included: • Project Overview • Existing Conditions Summary • Off-site Analysis Report(if required; usually for"large" projects) • Permanent Stormwater Control Plan • Special Reports and Studies(such as soil testing,wetland delineation,etc., if applicable) • Other Permits(approvals required by other regulatory agencies that include stormwater management conditions) • Operation and Maintenance Manual(for each flow control and treatment facility, if applicable) • Bond Quantities Worksheet (for performance bond or other financial guarantee for proper construction and operation of construction site BMPs and permanent drainage facilities, if required) The submittal template below is designed for rural residential and other relatively small or simple projects. For larger and more complex projects—particularly those that involve stormwater treatment and/or flow control—more information may be required and an independent Stormwater Site Plan may be the preferable submittal format. STEP 8: CHECK COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS A Stormwater Site Plan as designed and implemented should specifically fulfill all Minimum Requirements applicable to the project. The applicant should review to check that these requirements are satisfied and that all information provided is true and correct prior to signing and submitting the Stormwater Site Plan. (The signature box appears at the end of the submittal template.) MLA15-00013 stormwaler site plan template—rev 4/27;2015 4 EIEov el 0O, .c� ,I, JEFFERSON COUNTY -1 APR 2 8 2015 ►, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend •Washington 98368 JEFFERSON COUNTY x•O 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax _ DEPT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 'TNO http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ STORMWATER SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL TEMPLATE MLA# MLA15-00013 PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: CAMP BEAUSITE Please answer all of the following questions to the best of your ability. Where the question calls for depiction on a site map, the applicant may choose to either incorporate the elements into the general plot plan for the Master Land Use Application or to submit a separate stormwater site plan map. Project Overview 1. Describe the proposed developed conditions of the site. Indicate position and relative size of proposed improvements on the site map. To widen existing gravel trails from four feet to eight foot wide paved trails. Existing Conditions Summary 2. Describe the existing topography. Indicate contours on the site map. Fairly flat with a slight incline to the Northwest towards Lake Beausite. 3. Describe the existing vegetation. Indicate native vegetation areas on the site map. Area of proposed development has the majority of grasses with trees being sparse as conditions have historically been altered and mowed.The majority of the lake perimeter is densely vegetated with native trees, shrubs,and emergent Plant communities. 4. Describe the existing soils. Indicate soil type on the site map. 5. Describe the existing site hydrology (i.e., drainage; behavior of water on the site—above, below, and on the ground). Indicate existing stormwater drainage to and from the site on the site map. Depict separate drainage basins on the site map, if applicable,and indicate acreage of each. 6. Describe any excess levels of noise generated by the proposed use or activity: Noise will occur during construction of the trails. Once completed there should be no increase in additional noise. MLA15-00013 stormwater site plan template—rev.4/27/2015 5 7. Describe significant geographic features and critical areas (i.e., environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands, streams, steep slopes,etc.)on the site. Indicate location on the site map. The parcel is adjacent to a portion of Lake Beausite,the shoreline designation is conservancy.There is a 100'fish and wildlife conservation area in associated with this shoreline.There are also associated category II wetlands to the lake. There is a non-fish habitat stream to the North of the proposal,the proposal is outside of the buffer of this stream. 8. Describe the general vicinity of the site,including adjacent land uses and structures, utilities, roads,and sensitive/critical areas (streams,wetlands,lakes,steep slopes,etc.). The current use of the parcel is a camp for disabled adults and children.There are facilities currently on the parcel for this Including:one home site,lodge, restroom facilities,septic system,other outbuildings,trails,and parking areas. Permanent Stormwater Control Plan This portion of the Stormwater Site Plan consists of the selection and installation of the appropriate stormwater control BMPs and facilities to remain in place after construction of the project is completed. "Medium" size projects are required to have the totals calculated of all impervious surfaces, pollution-generating impervious surfaces, and pollution-generating pervious surfaces to verify that the thresholds for treatment facilities and flow control facilities are not exceeded. g. Describe the developed site hydrology, as proposed. Indicate whether stormwater will be fully dispersed (i.e., per BMP T5.30 in the Manual)or, if not,what types of stormwater flow control will be utilized for the site or specific threshold discharge areas within the site. Locate these facilities on the site plan and differentiate proposed facilities from existing facilities. Full dispersal through sheet flow off of proposed widening of paved trails. 10. If the project requires the use of stormwater treatment facilities, describe the types of stormwater treatment facilities proposed for use on the site. Locate these facilities on the site plan and differentiate proposed facilities from existing facilities. [This is normally for"large" projects or projects that involve the potential for dispersion of contaminants.] No stormwater treatment facilities will be used. 11. Describe the performance goals and standards applicable to the project. Impact will be minimal. ` = . - _ . - - - ---_-_ _ . - - / - -- - - ....... - .. !�(S 1'tJY d Q�P� ��i!"Ts!/Y� .C ef d�O YY�-Q y+ Lot �.e &c',10 r.n1 A, car,"9f'nud c421.4e_. 12. Describe the flow control system. N/A MLA15-00013 stormwater site plan template—rev.4/2712015 6 13. Describe the water quality system. `Pro Is d/7 a--; )(ce r f c-c).e/l<1.,,,/s 14. Describe the conveyance system analysis and design. Sheet flow off of trails to fully disperse into surround vegetation. 15. Describe the source of fill material,physical characteristics of fill material, and deposition of excess material. mat u-ern. ,--Cj will as u /t. W h.efe et,-c f ©� Lb CL ,suei/S -Frew\ eKca.0 s. nth exc��1 m r is u,d 164_ 4 ker, g o.. -crv,ep( sncc 16. Proposed methods of placement and compaction consistent with the applicable standards on Appendix Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. 17. Describe the proposed surfacing material. 18. Des be methods for restoration of the site. S P ' ,rerle-er b y �rQ,`I S cam ; I c/.&h U �re� / etra' I S ,� p'k 4 ir%8ty -f-� b; 4i.1: 19. An Operation and Maintenance Manual is required for each flow control and treatment facility. [This is normally required for "large"projects only and only those for which facilities are required to control flow or treat runoff.] If included,list the Manuals here. N/A 20. List here and include any special reports or studies conducted to prepare the Storrnwater Site Plan. Habitat Management Plan 21. List other necessary permits and approvals as required by other regulatory agencies. If those permits or approvals include conditions that affect the drainage plan or contain more restrictive drainage-related requirements,describe those conditions or restrictions here. MLA15-00013 stormwater site plan template—rev.4/27/2015 7 CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN(SWPPP) The Construction SWPPP addresses sediment and erosion control during construction. The BMPs indicated by the applicant in the template that follows must be installed on the ground during all construction phases of the project. The proponent is responsible for preventing sediment and erosion impacts to environmentally sensitive areas and off-site areas. Consult the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet for guidance, particularly with rural residential development. SECTION I—CONSTRUCTION SWPPP NARRATIVE 1. Construction Stormwater Pollution Plan Elements. Describe how each of the Construction SWPPP elements has been or will be addressed. Identify the type and location of BMPs used to satisfy the required element. If an element is not applicable to the proposal,justify in writing. Detailed descriptions of the 13 Elements are found at Volume II Section 3.3.3 of the Manual (beginning on page 3-11). 13 Required Elements—Construction SWPPP 1. Mark Clearing Limits. r Y G r D Q 1--t et d e. G1.2 - 1.-e 47) 64- L 11 _IT-44ot <-rte .' via FIB a■ i 2. Establish Construction Acceess. /�/ LL,SS u.3;11 t.)/%5%._ 2 exi—0- II op1`d 3. Control Flow Rates. US.' Ce r ; 2 rr•c-k r hs.d S't A. 45 S��Yr.4� e ilr,U-« p L4 / -' '.e � ,1 .so/ rates tr . 4. Install Sediment Controls. Sec 3 5. Stabilize Soils. See -3 6. Protect Slopes. Sew #3 7. pP�rotect Drain Inlets. Iv A MLA15-00013 starmwater site plan template—rev.4/27/2015 0 13 Required Elements–Construction SWPPP(continued) 8. Stabilize Channels and Outlets. PA 9. Control Pollutants. E.� 9 a%Irti). c�� -tt k an_A e$ p pi tvy RC, 10. Contr De-Watering(the act of pumping groundwater or stormwater away from an active construction site). OfPi 11. aintaln Best Management Practices(BMPs). 4trr L-0;11 b."- presee`t 0 f- a t'/ >Li'irLPs `/e ow-r- s„.2o 12. Manage the Project. Cg-yvl-ra-'-N L -,1,I p reszi•-± s� e (�vayk is .,+ // n £ yl.^ cLc ht f'htS I Aix 13. Protect Low Impact Development BMP's .esp£- -115 b u ci.. Pip ) --h N 2. Adjacent Areas. a. Description of the adjacent areas that may be affected by site disturbance (e.g., streams, lakes, wetlands, residential areas, roads). L n K -1?)-ea b0--‹ S-Fret, -14- ►td s b. Description of the downstream drainage path leading from the site to the receiving body of water(minimum distance of 400 yards). L-4144- s c araxi✓ e-11 /oDr 6-P trot/ IS &as e.,\.1F- I cpeticjs 3. Environmentally Sensitive Areas. a. Description of environmentally sensitive are s that are on or adjacent to the sitq(. L_ei11Cr P l� +�S 1 �.4r.4S , Sim 'hi M1('l.. MLA15-00013 stormwater site plan template—rev.4/27/2015 9 b. Description of special requirements for working in or near environmentally sensitive areas. 12Qsp„-- bo rr-e-rs, (LsiN 8M Ps, -p4tll d1_!)i/ I-44P 4. Erosion Problem Areas. Description of potential erosion problems on site in the context of the characteristics of the on-site soils(e.g.,erodibility,settleability,permeability,depth,texture,soil structure). / &-)r ---COW S PAbLe_ -Sr 01-. )r �S_ L..yy sue, 4r e_. ac - '1S !.,1 - IlL2-..• •- _ a - ^ , 5. Construction Phasing. a. Constr ction sequence b. Co s rt/ction phasing(if proposed) 6. Construction Schedule. Wet season is October 1 through April 30(page 2-20 of the Manual). I. Provide a proposed construction schedule. / i!� r 0 a' 1 I ' r�i /I , L+ 4 L- r;_ mac. I L,1 L, ' • L .4 a 1 1 _. ' 2d I� II. Wet Season Construction Activities. a. Proposed et seas n onstruction activities. [V lA wil1�� /n w�i�3eeaSOn b. Proposed wet season construction activities for environmentally sensitive areas. N/A it!/ hi he_ii1 w-e f sus, 7. Financial/Ownership Responsibilities. a. Id.p,) the property owner responsible for the initiation of bonds and/or other financial securities. b. Describe bonds and/or other evidence of financial responsibility for liability associated with erosion and sedimentation piim3pacts. 8. Engineering Calculations. Provide Desig77ACalculations on a separate sheet for the following, if applicable. a. Sediment Ponds/Traps. (f'\ N L -QA.Q , L..r% l rei i 1_A b. Diversions. If 0 c. Waterways. �� d. Runoff/Stormwater Detention Calculations t■4 f A MLA15-00013 stormwaler Bile plan template-rev.4/27/2015 10 SECTION II—EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN Sediment and erosion control measures may be depicted on the master land use application plot plan,a stormwater site plan,and/or a separate Construction SWPPP site plan. This is a checklist to ensure that the following are depicted on a site plan: 1. General. a. Vicinity Map b. Jefferson County Approval Block c. Erosion and Sediment Control Notes 2. Site Plan. a. Legal description of subject property. b. North arrow. c. Indicate boundaries of existing vegetation(e.g.,tree lines,pasture areas,etc.). d. Identify and label areas of potential erosion problems. e. Identify FEMA base flood boundaries and Shoreline Management boundaries(if applicable). f. Show existing and proposed contours. g. Indicate drainage basins and direction of flow for individual drainage areas. h. Label final grade contours and identify developed condition drainage basins. i. Delineate areas that are to be cleared and graded. j. Show all cut and fill slopes indicating top and bottom of slope catch lines. 3. Conveyance Systems. a. Designate locations for swales,interceptor trenches,or ditches. b. Show all temporary and permanent drainage pipes,ditches,or cut-off trenches required for erosion&sediment control. c. Provide minimum slope and cover for all temporary pipes or call out pipe inverts. d. Shows grades,dimensions,and direction of flow in all ditches,swales,culverts and pipes. e. Provide details for bypassing off-site runoff around disturbed areas. f. Indicate locations and outlets of any dewatering systems. 4. Location of Detention Best Management Practices(BMPs). Identify location of detention BMPs. 5. Erosion and Sediment Control Facilities. a. Show the locations of sediment trap(s), pond(s),pipes and structures. b. Dimension pond berm widths and inside and outside pond slopes. c. Indicate the trap/pond storage required and the depth,length,and width dimensions. d. Provide typical section views through pond and outlet structure. e. Provide typical details of gravel cone and standpipe,and/or other filtering devices. f. Detail stabilization techniques for outlet/inlet. g. Detail control/restrictor device location and details. h. Specify mulch and/or recommended cover of berms and slopes. i. Provide rock specifications and detail for rock check dam(s),if applicable. j. Specify spacing for rock check dams as required. k. Provide front and side sections of typical rock check dams. I. Indicate the locations and provide details and specifications for silt fabric. m. Locate the construction entrance and provide a detail. 6. Detailed Drawings. Any structural practices used that are not referenced in the Ecology Manual should be explained and illustrated with detailed drawings. 7. Other Pollutant BMPs. Indicate on the site plan the locations of BMPs to be used for the control of pollutants other than sediment(e.g.,concrete wash water). 8. Monitoring Locations. Indicate on the site plan the water quality sampling locations to be used for monitoring water quality on the construction site. Sampling stations should be located upstream and downstream of the project site. MLA15-00013 stormwater site plan template-rev.4/27/2015 11 Stormwater Site Plan Changes If the designer wishes to make changes or revisions to the originally approved Stormwater Site Plan, the proposed revisions shall be submitted to DCD prior to construction. The submittal shall include substitute pages that include all proposed changes, revised drawings showing any structural changes,and any other supporting information that explains and supports the reason for the change. Final Corrected Plan Submittal If the project included construction of conveyance systems, treatment facilities,flow control facilities, or structural source control BMPs (not standard on-site stormwater management BMPs), the applicant shall submit a final corrected plan ("as-builts")when the project is completed. These should be engineering drawings (stamped by a licensed civil engineer) that accurately represent the project as constructed. APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Construction SWPPP worksheet, I as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. Q C(-01 tx°±: 14- Z-1 %- (LANDOWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) THIS SPACE MAY BE USED FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES, IF NEEDED: MLA15-00013 stormwater site plan template—rev.4/27/2015 12 • • 2.5 Minimum Requirements This section describes the minimum requirements for stounwater management at development and redevelopment sites. Section 2.4 should be consulted to determine which requirements apply to any given project_ pislures 2.4.1 and 2.4.2 should be consulted to determine whether the minimum requirements apply to new surfaces,replaced surfaces, or new and replaced surfaces.Volumes II through V of this manual present Best 1V4-aiiagementFractices(BNMPsrfot use iri ntettngthe Minimum Requirements. Throughout this chapter,requirements are written in bold and supplemental guidelines that serve as advice and other materials are not in bold. 2.5.1 Minimum Requirement#1: Preparation of Stormwater Site Plans All projects meeting the thresholds in Section 2.4 shall prepare a Stormwater Site Plan for local government review.Stormwater Site Plans shall use site-appropriate development principles, as required and encouraged by local development codes,to retain native vegetation and minimize impervious surfaces to the extent feasible. Stormwater Site Plans shall be prepared in accordance with Chapter 3 of this volume. Objective The 2,000 square feet threshold for hard surfaces and 7,000 square foot threshold for land disturbance are chosen to capture most single family home construction and their equivalent Note that the scope of the stormwater site plan only covers compliance with Minimum Requirements #2 through#5 if the thresholds of 5,000 square feet of hard surface or • conversion of 3/ acre of vegetation to lawn or landscape, or conversion of 2.5 acres of vegetation to pasture are not exceeded. Supplemental guidelines Projects proposed by departments and agencies within the local government with jurisdiction must comply with this requirement. The local government shall determine the process for ensuring proper project review,inspection, and compliance by its own departments and agencies. Volume I-Minimum Technical Requirements-August 2012 2-16 • 2.5.2 Minimum Requirement #2: Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Thresholds All new development and redevelopment projects are responsible for preventing erosion and discharge of sediment and other pollutants into receiving waters. Projects which result in 2,000 square feet or more of new plus replaced hard surface area, or which disturb 7,000 square feet or more of land must prepare a Construction SWPP Plan (SWPPP) as part of the Stormwater Site Plan (see Section 2.5.1). Projects that result in less than 2,000 square feet of new plus replaced hard surface area, or disturb less than 7,000 square feet of land are not required to prepare a Construction SWPPE, but must consider all of the 13 Elements of Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention and develop controls for all elements that pertain to the project site. General Requirements The SWPPE shall include a narrative and drawings.All BMPs shall be clearly referenced in the narrative and marked on the drawings. The SWPPP narrative shall include documentation to explain and justify the pollution prevention decisions made for the project.Each of the 13 elements must be considered and included in the Construction SWPPP unless site conditions render the element unnecessary and the exemption from that element is clearly justified in the narrative of the SWPPP. Clearing and grading activities for developments shall be permitted only if conducted pursuant to an approved site development plan (e.g., subdivision approval) that establishes permitted areas of clearing, grading, cutting, and filling.These permitted clearing and grading areas and any other areas required to preserve critical or sensitive areas,buffers,native growth protection easements, or tree retention areas shall be delineated on the site plans and the development site. The SWPPP shall be implemented beginning with initial land disturbance and until final stabilization. Sediment and Erosion control BMPs shall be consistent with the BMPs contained in chapters 3 and 4 of Volume 11. Seasonal Work Limitations -From October 1 through April 30, clearing, grading, and other soil disturbing activities shall only be permitted if shown to the satisfaction of the local permitting authority that silt-laden runoff will be prevented from leaving the site through a combination of the following: 1. Site conditions including existing vegetative coverage, slope,soil type and proximity to receiving waters. Volume I—Minimum Technical Requirements—Augzust 2012 2-17 • • 2, Livaitations on activities and the extent of disturbed areas. 3. Proposed erosion and sediment control measures. The following activities are exempt from the seasonal clearing and grading limitations: 1. Routine maintenance and necessary repair of erosion and sediment control BMPs_ 2. Routine maintenance of public facilities or existing utility structures that do not expose the soil or result in the removal of the vegetative cover to soil_ 3. Activities where there is one hundred percent infiltration of surface water runoff within the site in approved and installed erosion and sediment control facilities. Project Requirements - Construction SWPPP Elements Element 1: Preserve Vegetation/Mark Clearing Limits . Before begjnningland disturbing activities,including clearing and grading,clearly mark all clearing limits, sensitive areas and their buffers, and trees that are to be preserved within the construction area. . Retain the duff layer,native top soil, and natural vegetation in an undisturbed state to the maximum degree practicable. Element 2: Establish Construction Access . Limit construction vehicle access and exit to one route,if possible. . Stabilize access points with a pad of quarry spalls, crushed rock, or other equivalent BMPs,to minimize tracking of sediment onto public roads. . Locate wheel wash or tire baths on site,if the stabilized construction entrance is not effective in preventing tracking sediment onto roads. . If sediment is tracked off site,clean the affected roadway thoroughly at the end of each day, or more frequently as necessary (for example, during wet weather). Remove sediment from roads by shoveling,sweeping, or pick up and transport the sediment to a controlled sediment disposal area. . Conduct street washing only after sediment is removed in accordance with the above bullet. Volume!—Minimum Technical Requirements—August 2012 2-18 • • . Control street wash wastewater by pumping back on-site, or otherwise prevent it from discharging into systems tributary to waters of the State. Element 3: Control Flow Rates • Protect properties and waterways downstream of development sites from erosion and the associated discharge of turbid waters clue to increases in the velocity and peak volumetric flow rate of stormwater runoff from the project site. . Where necessary to comply with the bullet above, construct stormwater retention or detention facilities as one of the first steps in grading.Assure that detention facilities function properly before constructing site improvements (e.g.impervious surfaces). . If permanent infiltration ponds are used for flow control during construction,protect these facilities from siltation during the construction phase. Element 4: Install Sediment Controls • Design,install, and maintain effective erosion controls and sediment controls to minimize the discharge of pollutants. • Construct sediment control BMPs (sediment ponds, traps,filters, etc.) as one of the first steps in grading.These BMPs shall be functional before other land disturbing activities take place. • Minimize sediment discharges from the site.The design, installation and maintenance of erosion and sediment controls must address factors such as the amount,frequency,intensity and duration of precipitation,the nature of resulting stormwater runoff,and soil characteristics,including the range of soil particle sizes expected to be present on the site. . Direct stormwater runoff from disturbed areas through a sediment pond or other appropriate sediment removal BIM, before the runoff leaves a construction site or before discharge to an infiltration facility.Runoff from fully stabilized areas may be discharged without a sediment removal BMP,but must meet the flow control performance standard in Element#3, bullet#1. • Locate BMPs intended to trap sediment on-site in a manner to avoid interference with the movement of juvenile salmonids attempting to enter off-channel areas or drainages. . Where feasible, design outlet structures that withdraw impounded stormwater from the surface to avoid discharging sediment that is still suspended lower in the water column. Volume I—Minimum Technical Requirements—August 2012 2-19 • • • Element 5: Stabilize Soils Stabilize exposed and unworked soils by application of effective BMPs that prevent erosion.Applicable BMPs include,but are not limited to: temporary and permanent seeding,sodding,mulching, plastic covering, erosion control fabrics and matting, soil application of polyacrylanude (PAM), the early application of gravel base early on areas to be paved, and dust control. • Control stormwater*drunk and velocity within the site to minimize soil erosion. • Control stormwater discharges,including both peak flow rates and total stormwater volume,to minimize erosion at outlets and to minimize downstream channel and stream bank erosion. • Soils must not remain exposed and unworked for more than the time periods set forth below to prevent erosion: • During the dry season (May 1 -Sept.30): 7 days • During the wet season (October 1-April 30): 2 days • Stabilize soils at the end of the shift before a holiday or weekend if needed based on the weather forecast. • Stabilize soil stockpiles from erosion,protected with sediment trapping measures, and where possible,be located away from storm drain inlets,waterways and drainage channels. . Minimize the amount of soil exposed during construction activity. • Minimize the disturbance of steep slopes. • Minimize soil compaction and,unless infeasible, preserve topsoil. Element 6: Protect S lopes . Design and construct cut-and-fill slopes in a manner to minimize erosion.Applicable practices include,but are not limited to, reducing continuous length of slope with terracing and diversions, reducing slope steepness,and roughening slope surfaces (for example,track walking). . Divert off-site stormwater(run-on) or ground water away from slopes and disturbed areas with interceptor dikes, pipes and/or swales. Off-site stormwater should be managed separately from stormwater generated on the site. • At the top of slopes, collect drainage in pipe slope drains or protected channels to prevent erosion. . Temporary pipe slope drains must handle the peak 10-minute velocity of flow from a Type 1A, 10-year, 24-hour frequency Volume I-Minimum Technical Requirements-August 2012 2-20 • • storm for the developed condition. Alternatively, the 10-year and 1-hour flow rate predicted by an approved continuous runoff model,increased by a factor of L6, maybe used The hydrologic analysis must use the existing land cover condition for predicting flow rates from tributary areas outside the project limits.For tributary areas on the project site,the analysis Must use the temporary or permanent project land cover condition,whichever will produce the highest flow rates. If using the Western Washington Hydrology Model (MIDI) to predict flows,bare soil areas should be modeled as "Iandscaped" area. • Place excavated material on the uphill side of trenches,consistent with safety and space considerations. • Place check dams at regular intervals within constructed channels that are cut down a slope. Element 7: Protect Drain Inlets • Protect all storm drain inlets made operable during construction so that stormwater runoff shall not enter the conveyance system without first being filtered or treated to remove sediment. • Clean or remove and replace inlet protection devices when sediment has filled one-third of the available storage (unless a different standard is specified by the product manufacturer). Element 8: Stabilize Channels and Outlets • Design, construct, and stabilize all on-site conveyance channels to prevent erosion from the following expected peak flows: Channels must handle the peak 10-minute velocity of flow from a Type 1A, 10-year,24-hour frequency storm for the developed condition.Alternatively,the 10-year, 1-hour flow rate indicated by an approved continuous runoff model, increased by a factor of L6,may be used.The hydrologic analysis must use the existing land cover condition for predicting flow rates from tributary areas outside the project limits.For tributary areas on the project site,the analysis must use the temporary or permanent project land cover condition, whichever will produce the highest flow rates.If using the Western Washington Hydrology Model (WWHM) to predict flows, bare soil areas should be modeled as "landscaped area. • Provide stabilization,including armoring material, adequate to prevent erosion of outlets, adjacent stream banks, slopes and downstream reaches at the outlets of all conveyance systems. Volume I-Minimum Technical Requirements-August 2012 2-71 • • Element 9: Control Pollutants . Design,install,implement and maintain effective pollution prevention measures to minimize the discharge of pollutants. . Handle and dispose of all pollutants,including waste materials and demolition debris that occur on-site in a manner that does not cause contamination of stormwater. . Provide cover, containment,.andpratection from vandalism for all chemicals,liquid products,petroleum products, and other materials that have the potential to pose a threat to human health or the environment. On-site fueling tanks must include secondary containment. Secondary containment means placing tanks or containers within an impervious structure capable of containing 110% of the volume contained in the largest take within the containment structure.Double-walled tanks do not require additional secondary containment. . Conduct maintenance,fueling, and repair of heavy equipment and vehicles using spill prevention and control measures. Clean contaminated surfaces immediately following any spill incident. . Discharge wheel wash or tire bath wastewater to a separate on-site treatment system that prevents discharge to surface water, such as closed-loop recirculation or upland application, or to the sanitary sewer,with local sewer district approval_ . Apply fertilizers and pesticides in a manner and at application rates that will not result in loss of chemical to stormwater runoff. Follow manufacturers'label requirements for application rates and procedures. . Use BMPs to prevent contamination of stormwater runoff by pH modifying sources.The sources for this contamination include, but are not limited to: bulk cement, cement kiln dust,fly ash,new concrete washing and curing waters,waste streams generated from concrete grinding and sawing, exposed aggregate processes, dewatering concrete vaults,concrete pumping and mixer washout waters. • Adjust the pH of stormwater if necessary to prevent violations of water quality standards. • Assure that washout of concrete trucks is performed off-site or in designated concrete washout areas only.Do not wash out concrete trucks onto the ground, or into storm drains, open ditches,streets, or streams.Do not dump excess concrete on-site, except in designated concrete washout areas. Concrete spillage or concrete discharge to surface waters of the State is prohibited. Volume I-Minimum Technical Requirements-August 2012 2-77 • • . Obtain written approval from Ecology before using chemical treatment other than CO2 or dry ice to adjust pH. Element 10: Control De-Watering . Discharge foundation,vault, and trench de-watering water,which has similar characteristics to stormwater runoff at the site,into a controlled conveyance system before discharge to a sediment trap or sediment pond. • Discharge clean,non-turbid de-watering water,such as well-point ground water,to systems tributary to, or directly into surface waters of the State, as specified in Element#8,provided the de- watering flow does not cause erosion or flooding of receiving waters.Do not route clean dewatering water through stormwater sediment ponds.Note that"surface waters of the State"may exist on a construction site as well as off site; for example, a creek running through a site. . Handle highly turbid or otherwise contaminated dewatering water separately from stormwater. . Other treatment or disposal options may include: 1. Infiltration. 2. Transport off-site in a vehicle,such as a vacuum flush truck, for legal disposal in a manner that does not pollute state waters. 3. Ecology-approved on-site chemical treatment or other suitable treatment technologies_ 4. Sanitary or combined sewer discharge with local sewer district approval,if there is no other option. 5. Use of a sedimentation bag with outfall to a ditch or Swale for small volumes of localized dewatering. Element 11: Maintain BMPs . Maintain and repair all temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control BMPs as needed to assure continued performance of their intended function in accordance with BMP specifications. • Remove all temporary erosion and sediment control BMPs within 30 days after achieving final site stabilization or after the temporary BMPs are no longer needed. Volume I—Minimum Technical Requirements—August 2012 7_73 • • Element 12: Manage The Project • phase development projects to the maximum degree practicable and take into account seasonal work limitations_ . Inspection and monitoring—Inspect,maintain and repair all B1VIPs as needed to assure continued performance of their intended function.Projects regulated under the Construction Stormwater General Permit must conduct site inspections and monitoring in accordance with Special-Condition S4 of the Construction Stormwater General Permit. Maintaining an updated construction SWPPP—Maintain, update, and implement the SWPPP. Projects that disturb one or more acres must have site inspections conducted by a Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead (CESCL).Project sites disturbing less than one acre may have a CESCL or a person without CESCL certification conduct inspections.By the initiation of construction,the SWPPP must identify the CESCL or inspector,who must be present on-site or 0n=call at all tunes. The CESCL or inspector(project sites less than one acre)must have the skills to assess the: . Site conditions and construction activities that could impact the quality of stormwater. . Effectiveness of erosion and sediment control measures used to control the quality of stormwater discharges_ . The CESCL or inspector must examine stormwater visually for the presence of suspended sediment,turbidity,discoloration, and oil sheen. They must evaluate the effectiveness of BMPs and determine if it is necessary to install,maintain, or repair BMPs to improve the quality of stormwater discharges. Based on the results of the inspection, construction site operators must correct the problems identified by: . Reviewing the SWPPP for compliance with the 13 construction SWPPP elements and making appropriate revisions within 7 days of the inspection. . Immediately beginning the process of fully implementing and maintaining appropriate source control and/or treatment BMPs as soon as possible, addressing the problems not later than within 10 days of the inspection. If installation of necessary treatment BMPs is not feasible within 10 days,the construction site operator may request an extension within the initial 10-day response period. Volume I-Minimum Technical Requirements-August 2012 2-24 . • • Documenting BMP implementation and maintenance in the site log book (sites larger than 1 acre). • The CESCL or inspector must inspect all areas disturbed by construction activities, all BMPs, and all stoiuiwater discharge points at least once every calendar week and within 24 hours of any discharge from the site (For purposes of this condition, individual discharge events that last more than one day do not require daily inspections. For example, if a stormwaterpond discharges continuously over the course of a week, only one inspection is required that week.) The CESCL or inspector may reduce the inspection frequency for temporary stabilized, inactive sites to once every calendar month_ Element 13: Protect Low Impact Development BMPs • Protect all Bioretention and Rain Garden BMPs from sedimentation through installation and maintenance of erosion and sediment control BMPs on portions of the site that drain into the Bioretention and/or Rain Garden BMPs.Restore the$MPs to their fully functioning condition if they accumulate sediment during construction.Restoring the BMP must include removal of sediment and any sediment-laden Bioretention/rain garden soils, and replacing the removed soils with soils meeting the design specification. • Prevent compacting Bioretention and rain garden BMPs by excluding construction equipment and foot traffic.Protect completed lawn and landscaped areas from compaction due to construction equipment. • Control erosion and avoid introducing sediment from surrounding land uses onto permeable pavements.Do not allow muddy construction equipment on the base material or pavement.Do not allow sediment-laden runoff onto permeable pavements or base materials. • Pavement fouled with sediments or no longer passing an initial infiltration test must be cleaned using procedures in accordance with this manual or the manufacturer's procedures. • Keep all heavy equipment off existing soils under LID facilities that have been excavated to final grade to retain the infiltration rate of the soils. Volume I—Minimum Technical Requirements—August 2012 2-25 Anna Bausher From: Donna Frostholm Sent: Thursday,April 23, 2015 5:50 PM To: Anna Bausher Subject: Camp Beausite Anna: Olympic Wetland Resources generally delineates the wetland boundary correctly so, due to time constraints, I will not make a site visit to confirm the delineation. Rick Mraz has reviewed the wetland rating so I will not provide any additional comments on the rating. I agree with OWR that a Category II wetland with low land use risk has a 75-foot buffer and that lakes have a 100-foot buffer. The number and types of plants proposed in the September 2014 OWR Habitat Management Plan would be expected to mitigate for any project impacts and provide some screening between the lake and the more heavily used areas at the camp. Let me know if you have any questions. Donna JrosthoCm .associate Planner/WetlandSpecialist Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street - !i Port Townsend Washington 98368 360-379-4466 dfrostholm @co jeff erson.wa.us DCD is open from 9:00am—12:00pm and 1:00pm—4:30pm Monday through Thursday;DCD is closed on Friday. 'I All emails sent to and from this address will automatically be archived by Jefferson County and emails may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. III II 1 Anna Bausher From: Mraz, Richard A. (ECY)<rmra461 @ECY.WA.GOV> Sent: Wednesday,April 22, 2015 8:43 AM To: Anna Bausher Subject: RE: MLA15-00013 Reviewer Letter Hi Anna, I have no significant concerns or comments about this proposal. There are a few elements of the wetland rating that seem erroneous or contradictory,but they are minor in nature and would not result in a different wetland category. I may follow up with Dixie to discuss them but, again, I have no concerns or objections. ciek etas,PWS Wetlands/Shorelands Specialist Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program Southwest Regional Office (360)407-6221 rmra461@ecy.wa.gov From: Anna Bausher [mailto:ABausher @co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 2:37 PM To: Mraz, Richard A. (ECY) Subject: MLA15-00013 Reviewer Letter Good afternoon Rick, Attached a reviewer letter for the attached Habitat Management Plan for Camp Beausite.This plan contains information regarding the wetland rating and mitigation for the proposal which is why it is being sent to you, per the JCC.The wetlands previously were delineated in 1995 when the camp was established.This proposal is to expand the existing trails from 4 feet packed gravel trails to 8 feet wide paved trails in order to meet ADA requirements.The plan provides more details of this as well as photos of the proposal in relation to the wetland. Please let me know if there is anything further I can provide you with for your review.Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Anna Bausher Assistant Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street *Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4454 *Fax 360-379-4451 abausher@cojefferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56.Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law,including RCW 4156 and other state laws. 1 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Mae • WI I Legend - ---_- 901213009 .1C_Roads "•��''t=='e i 901273001 Parcels-H i • 1 - Wetlands 610 a �s 4 y.:•25IG_3 0, . IF _________________________________:,,__„,., ,, , ,.. „, 9012/300• ••�.y 90,281009 %I aas yo.dol Ir..e?bm Carry Ce9rtl&rom GIS 0∎28511 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its orrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Thu Mar 19 14:18:47 2015 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 3/19/2015 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma. t , .. . „. ., „ , . ,,, ,..., . , IL 1,1.0,.6„„: 1 , ,Wit! eN . GEVED Legend _ JC_Roads y 2013 Aerial Photos o6t m' . ,&.. !a is COMOM Pa• I MEM OWED 1 144.r.srr.tl 1,...AI AO CAA r,Cc-r...1 rs--cc FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its .rrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Thu Mar 19 14:18:29 2015 i http://gisserver/servlet/com.e sri.e srimap.Esri map?ServiceName=ovmap&C lientVersion=4.... 3/19/20 1 5 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma• — "� 97.2+x+0' 901 2 1 509 3 __ .c/ 002 t- j 969900001 eriss ea99aoctt z 90128.t021 4,1 1 ""+i TTTT5oc6 TTI i _ -- la nd 90 28400 ��`,I - 4 �.•tI3003- JC Roads 111 ^• ., Parcels-1i-% ♦.. ♦ :.r'. Parcels- ' ,or*. «` • 2013 Aerial Photos OOZED I W1 901273001 1 .. , 6S,s 'X/28404 _ 901273003.. I 1 f, I 1 llsc'o'o hid .:-crm carry°c r I sc:un Gti G 3uz.-.. _ FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its orrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Thu Mar 19 1 14:17:49 2015 http://gi s server/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?Servi ceName=ovmap&C l ientV ersion=4.... 3/19/2015 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 901275001 901275010 901275002 901201022 1 j !89900002 901281027 j r' __ 901281023 i � --9eRa �i _ 901275009901275008 �901275007 I _ � 1I, Micrie. 1 90,,-µr Legend 901273003 JC_Roath Parcels-H SMP Shore line 5 EnvironnwntaI Designations 901281004 , 901273001 I .' l 901273001 901... �. 901273003 ❑ AsuyK ® Consonancy NONNI ■ I v r NA 901 ..1 /' 9012730D3 Aqua lc a Penny Aque 901284003 �`e �. Messie a aed^ntd R 9012734+" F11, r 1 K x FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- I Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Thu Mar 19 l 14:17:00 2015 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.csrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 3/19/2015 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma e ipiRr, 111110, 1 Legend JC_Roads - 901275001- 90121'»:_, Parcels-H 901275010 901275002 I County Zoning . 800001 .w NPR-SF inns 1 901281022 900900002. Rural ResMantat 1:5 90'281021 f Residential 1:10 i 901281023 °.. 1 Rural Residential 1:20 + 4620 FU NPR Single Family I .+1 0 '1.901270000 901275007 ■ NVR Nan damlry NPR Resod Coms■es Parks and Racraat an 1 1.1■ NPR'Open 5p is Rural Forest Cwnsc lding vl Fa Fmsores1.1 ■ HealyInaustral _'2810104 1 73001 at lrroun CPF 5t, t.13U.-1 '711W47..../. I, ■ NPR-Weiss Genre,' 1{+'2&1002 s ■ AP 1:20 ■ Rural Vaasa Center ail MI Resource Damn mo p Li t9 Inaustral ly0 Y1.2/3G_'. NPR-ROOIAImn i. 90".284001 r Waste Me mt CPC 9012840938 .. YN ■ Cre'eaads-OC . Crossroads-CC g . 0romoads-NC AlF1s'111 AL 1:20 t c dp UGA dress Conmmnraal it 4.'.._ ¢ UGA-Ureon Opel Ineusire A 'Ir:i _∎•r.dnd oY-c+fvolCau'ey Co-ea Pa.' CIS 1a UGA-MDR UGA-110R UGA Pubic UGA-tDR .:L. UGA-Vrsdor Onented Commerce:. N PR.IAN Dnnnon CF mioa aOverlay Faros aiaR e FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its orrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Thu Mar 19 14:16:47 2015 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 3/19/2015 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 901275001 9C 2+'x',:53 901275010 901275002'` 9s9a°°°° L 90'281022 989900002 901281021 901281023 --...ilrefi7e,0-..... i 1 901275000901275008 90'2?5Y.? 7 Legend 901284001 r �. 9012730:3 3 . JC Roads �i 9012tY I'+ Parcels+) t In Seismic Hazard 9f: 28•Cti4 i' 90•27c x ' !�.901273004 1 901213001 9012&1002 SC 179(.3 ; °'c 4 ( 9012730334, 901289004 f s W.289C{�3 'FB i .5 C y ra. m A Mar,a a.jai a._ca.r ma_airy Ccra:cvcx-GG C∎S/011 0. FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Thu Mar 19 14:16:00 2015 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 3/19/2015 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 931273001 9au73003 i 901273010 901275032 9899000C• 1 1: 90!281022 98990i7t%i2 901281021 ; 90!281023 1 :! „,,vge Ra tj 901275009e0127w03 j 901273007 r — ___, illinreP 901 :"∎ ■ ��� II 190 273003 �c rtn�a� IParoaliei . Wetlands ti 28•L=•7 901273001 90^273004 ■ 901273001 1" 90'2 la) 90127300.4 <to 901273C•L9 r rs W.'284009 C% ,90•Z/3 ' m m A S limy,7a:.ks]v:-r< ,..r1 -I r,C o ca 3r:cr GO 0∎snt FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Thu Mar 19 14:15:38 2015 II http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 3/19/2015 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map —" '"---90127500! 901275003 t I 901275010 901275032 901281022 II 989100002 • 901281821 j' .i — 1 1 901281023 ["-- + ! d9eRd a�f 901275039 9°1275"l'901275007 9012840C4 Legend 901273003 Selected Features i 1 I JC_Roads i Parcels-H DNR FP Stream 93'za•Lo1 9012!2,--' Classification 901273007 901273001 901273003 A/ F Fnn uaSnm ,�. , N-Non fisn IIadat NNP-Non den IIa na Peronn a! Na Nan-fnn 11a da-SOasonal 'to 9 012 3063 0 3 Ai s Inwn!orcd ShoMme T.o V!+'2fy!ON Pa 1 N 901273001 '� C e m A %I am rardad a..eta Corry Ceta&re,CAS 0∎,x}ry a FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Thu Mar 19 14:15:09 2015 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 3/19/2015 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 901275001 901275003 } I 901275010 901275002 j 989900001 l' 901281022 909900002 901'281021 i -t,_-- 901281023 \ i lii DeR.1� ,. 90127.999901 59991 901275007 '1 Legend 901284001( 4 901273003 1•-p Selected Features JC_Rwds Parcels-H j .Y.` DNR Streams 901281004 901173001 901273001 901273003 w/ Type 5 6 901264002 '1, i ♦- Type• evl T 3 ime-...".... ,.., //� Type I: f/ l/ Typal %y. 901273003 ys`901284od1 :; "Al. Cheat 901284003 , v V A I 90127300' 8 p: m Y .0 Maas proeded W.ahrem Cauroy Cerma Sere GC 0mommumi■■572h O. FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Thu Mar 19 14:15:02 2015 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV ersion=4.... 3/19/2015 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map t r 991175091 9012rv_.3 901175010 901275002 *- 98990(FCc I 901281022 989900_x.2 90t28,_,. _ r _1__ �. � 1� 1 901281013 �� ,J 'p 901275006 L. �9e��• Legend /:' 901275009 I 901273007 Selected Features .� .I JC_Roads "_. Pa rce Is 41 DNR FP Stream __/ Classification 901284001 l SYi'1! _.:' •I F.FAN Nab.= N•Noe-fish Rabat 'r .1 Ny•Non-fish HlMat•lwnnul f . m Ns No fee tly LieSea enel 'LdZe 901273001 /,+, S.mvemorws SNetine 901273004 901273001 1'' 901289002 901273003 DNR Streams '..1� „Not Type 9 ■. 1 Twe5 s i.r !. r Type Type d4T `• 9012730031 �90264084 ,' T 3 e( / ,opi Type 2 X'254.203 % i/ i tf Type DNR Water Bodies . F . N 1. 901273001 1.fi . e N J:.;o..y_^ m A LFA-Fish Moos nardetl ey:eNivm Carry Cana SP-v cos GtS 0oS/0t o. FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Thu Mar 19 14:14:31 2015 http://gi s serve r/servlet/com.a sri.a srimap.Esrimap?Servi ceName=ovmap&C lientV ersion=4.... 3/19/2015 l Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map ti _ �"2 JL . cf so; I I y J>J i ''f Sr 1's' d c x::92' \ t '..)1 i �' oJ.f• 98Y000001�,. y �.. A, j 901281022 r ..' �s,e-yy00002� �- l r' 901281021` I ----, ! 4�jr) 'r 1 5 r ti 7 801281023'-' ' 1A J' I .�/al �-'t. n 901275009°J1j7271Otj8 -„f___ ? 44 C .-41._ ; , , ---''' a 1 1 1�t � /1. Le Send i r9ot2M80t �I 1 Selected Features C 1 ' J JC Roads 1 '1 t 5 !IJ -._ `543 Parcels-H � -'. \ ti � i Contours 9ot2T3oca 10 coot contour C 'v w_,1,_,_• 161!x)2 ` r 1. :.. .I 'A FOOT contour j'. ', .j , ' -7L7-.-1” 44.CEVIIT : '\ ---'-',' --'‘`I'‘N ; '1'':\'':- -- .51- ` . 901289003 t; tie �/ ) 1, , 9., - Q.5/12 r qp. Y 1 _.) a ��. �� I.. i1. , 1. I ' L. r ) 11S I ,- I O I f l- N l /1 ; I j 111 I !n o' g f r�� ,r 9o,nw91 , o 1`..+_ t}) (/} a \iaamdntl M.ldesm Cash Cams Sena GIS ti.. r !}. mss/ FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Thu Mar 19 14:14:10 2015 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 3/19/2015 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma. Ullf‘lwr"it Legend 901273001 0 Selected Features s .._.. ms/1 JC_Roads Parcels-H SMP_Shoreline Environmental me Designations a'p,, 9012: .";. C 7 A.,..¢ . ?:"2!4.K.2 tl0 Inteerny �'"....... l I I Natural __... I Priority Actualoc -rte~ 10 Snarelina ReaAenlal 901273001 1 \Ian:Yu:da]>:_cc:un Coori'=ac.a Sc-:cc.GIS is 28511 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its orrectness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection.Thu Mar 19 14:22:00 2015 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 3/19/2015 Page 1 of 1 Map Output ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 1• `' 1 4 \\\---J /14.4 ` 901273004 901273001 Legend n Selected Features i JC_Roads Parosis-ii DMR FP Stream Classification B m G 901269004 �A F•FM Hairdo `aI N•Non-lnil I1annul 6 ,p6 ry/ EaEF ul al 901273001 AaIN281004 11mr:aa:dnd nt.dkssmCasry Cots Se ees GtS 0®18511 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Thu Mar 19 14:21:45 2015 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 3/19/2015 o DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOP � �� 621 Sheridan Sacct,Port t ,.erscna,WA 98368 � 4-, Tel.360.379 , Fax• 3600.9.4-431 DI MAR - 3 2015 Web:www.co.ieffurs4)n.wirua;cnmmuintcdevclnpinent F:mail dcd'i1coieffersnnwaw J L 9SkIN3' IE7 Jf'iY l r STORMWATER CALCULATION WORKSHEET '��w ir yEloPMENT MLA tt PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: DETERMINING STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS:This stormwater calculation worksheet should be completed first to classify the proposal as "small," "medium," or "large." The size determines whether a Stormwater Site Plan is required in conjunction with a stand-alone stormwater management permit application, building permit application,or other land use approval application that involves stormwater review. The basic information will also be helpful for completing a Stormwater Site Plan, if required. PARCEL SIZE (I.E.,SITE) Size of parcel 5 5 acres An acre contains 43,560 square feet. Multiply the acreage by this figure. Size of parcel in square feet 2-375 td6 sq/ft • Land-disturbing activity is any activity that results in movement of earth,or a change in the existing soil cover(both vegetative and non-vegetative)and/or the existing soil topography. Land disturbing activities include, but are not limited to clearing,grading,filling, excavation,and compaction associated with stabilization of structures and road construction. Native vegetation is vegetation comprised on plant species, other than noxious weeds,that are indigenous to the coastal region of the Pacific Northwest and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur on the site. Examples include species such as Douglas fir, western hemlock, western red cedar, alder, big-leaf maple, and vine maple; shrubs such as willow, elderberry, salmonberry,and salal;herbaceous plants such as sword fern,foam flower,and fireweed. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY, CONVERSION OF NATIVE VEGETATION, AND VOLUME OF CUT/FILL Calculate the total area to be cleared, graded,filled, Answer the following two questions related to excavated, and/or compacted for proposed development conversion of native vegetation: project. Include in this calculation the area to be cleared for: Does the project convert'/.acres or more of Construction site for structures sq/ft native vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas? Drainfield,septic tank,etc. sq/ft Circle: Yes `NO^ Well, utilities,etc. sq/ft Does the project convert 2 Yr acres or more of native vegetation to pasture? Driveway,parking, roads,etc. /Q2,3 sq/ft Circle: Yes No Lawn, landscaping, etc. sq/ft Other compacted surface,etc. sq/ft Indicate Total Volumes of Proposed: Total Land Disturbance sq/ft Cut_ J Fill (cu/yd) Impervious surface is a hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle as under natural conditions prior to development. A hard surface area which causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to roof tops,walkways, patios, driveways, parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving,gravel roads, packed earthen materials,and oiled,macadam or other surfaces which similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. stormwater talc worksheet-REV.10/202014 1 • • n:, MAR - 32015 J STORMWATER CALULATIONS–IMPERVIOUS SURFACE NEW EXISTING Structures(all roof area) sq/ft Structures(all roof area) `/Z YV sq/ft Sidewalks sq/ft Sidewalks sq/ft Patios sq/ft Patios sq/ft Solid Decks _sq/ft Solid Decks sq/ft (without infiltration below) (without infiltration below) , Driveway, parking, roads, etc 3/5 /12_ _sq/ft Driveway, parking, roads,etc ,70 7 sq/ft Other sq/ft Other C sq/ft Total New .__),5 1 Z _4sq/ft Total Existing /i2 735_._scot TOTAL NEW+TOTAL EXISTING' _ L Fi sq/ft 'This amount will be used to check total lot coverage. The following questions will help determine whether the proposed project is considered development or redevelopment. DEVELOPMENT v. REDEVELOPMENT Divide the total existing impervious surface above by the size of the parcel and convert to a percentage: .W % Does the site have 35%or more of existing impervious surface? Circle: Yes 111 No M. FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS: If the answer is yes,the proposal is considered redevelopment and the attached Figure 2 should be used to determine the applicable Minimum Requirements. If the answer is no, the proposal is considered new development and the attached Figure 1 should be used. At this juncture, the applicant should refer to the applicable Flow Chart to determine the Minimum Requirements for stormwater management. DCD staff will help verify the classification of the project and the application requirements. For proponents of "small" projects who must comply only with Minimum Requirement #2—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention—an additional submittal is not required. The proponent is responsible for employing the 12 Elements to control erosion and prevent sediment and other pollutants from leaving the site during the construction phase of the project. Pick up the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPS) Packet. Proponents of "medium" projects—those that must meet only Minimum Requirements#1 through#5—and for"large" projects—those that must meet all 10 Minimum Requirements—are required to submit a Stormwater Site Plan. DCD has prepared a submittal template of a Stormwater Site Plan, principally for rural residential projects. Complete the template in the Stormwater Site Plan Instructions and Submittal Template or prepare a Stormwater Site Plan using the step-by-step guidance in the Stormwater Management Manual. APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Stormwater Calculation Worksheet,I as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. (LANDOWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNAT RE) (DATE) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY SMALL MEDIUM LARGE REDEVELOPMENT Stormwater Site Plan: Yes No stormwater calc worksheet-REV.10/20/2014 FIGURE 1 : NEW DEVELOPMENT Start Here Does the site have Yes See Redevelopment 35%or more of Minimum existing impervious Requirements and coverage? Flow Chart No Does (Figure 2) oes the project convert 3/a acres or more of native vegetation to lawn or Does the project add No landscaped areas, or 5,000 square feet or convert 2.5 acres or more more of new of native vegetation to impervious surfaces? pasture? Yes Yes No Does the project have "LARGE" PROJECT 2,000 square feet or All Minimum Requirements more of new,replaced, apply to the new impervious or new plus replaced surfaces and converted impervious surfaces? pervious surfaces. Yes No V "MEDIUM" PROJECT Does the project have Minimum Requirements#1 land-disturbing through#5 apply to the new 4 activities of 7,000 and replaced impervious Yes square feet or more? surfaces and the land disturbed. No V "SMALL"PROJECT See Minimum Requirement#2, Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Based on Fig.2.2 from 2001 Ecology Stotmwater Management Manual for Western Washington RECORD DRAWING �'Tncwn.�n 9-"&c2 i Property Owner: NW Kiwanis Parcel 1 5 h901�273-004 . Qvlai . Designer. Jerry Jacobs Date Inspected: 07/16/2009 . Installer: — Owner (Kiwanis Volunteer) Permit SEP1: 2008-00075 . E �' �M7 N �1: MAR - 2015 II 11 „ _ __ ERSOtN',GUN scat:, =50 EXISTING 1000 D�"T.n-CO_'1.0TYDEV�10: 4yNT ;o ,a GALLON GREASE TRAP 10' c --__I 1._____ %%\\ 500 GALLON A/G Q,r e EXISTING PROPANE TANK O:`' i , SAND FILTER ol" (y,�b�e,./`�' 155' FR. EAST PROPERTY LINE , �T'Xq` XISTING HQ EXISTING 2000 BUILDING PARKING GALLON PUMP CHA BER ,EXISTING 1250 RESTROOM —CLEAN OUTCS) GALLON_SEPTIC TANK FACILITY .----_____________ir EXISTING 3000 A�LCON SEPTIC TANK EXISTING SEASONAL CREEK DRIVEWAY--. PARKING EXISTING /DRIVEWAY NG RN di ( !EU!A /:44,TE M .. I certify the i nformation heron was verified by inspection and the r system installation appears to have been completed in accordance Fe, L. JA *BS '�11 with the approved design except for the changes made during off,., 3 $E' '1= I NER 1I, installation as noted above and on the reverse. EXPI• S 1 r 'I o' O7((7(c� Designers Stamp and Signature: RECORD DRAWING Dina c Property Owner NW Kiwanis Parcel I 901— 73-004 . 51.1.01 . Designer: Jerry Jacobs Date Inspected: 07/16/2009 . Installer. — Owner (Kiwanis Volunteer) Permit SEPj 2008-00075 . ‘INWR ECEWE \- N D MAR - 32015 I y�,' I]j E RsoN cl Nil( "Ill NUN D- I.OPVENT SiaCe:2"=50' EXISTING 1000 ,o =0 GALLON GREASE TRAP 20' c_ -_,..1 3 ----T--to4\ 54 , -_h -42 500 GALLON A/G/ rr EXISTING PROPANE TANK O SAND FILTER (�•y['l q,� 155' FR, EAST PROPERTY LINE C XA` XISTING HQ EXISTING 2000 BUILDING PARKING GALLON PUMP CHA BER EXISTING 1250 RESTR❑OM , GAL SEPTIC TANK FACILITY ,.CLEAN OUT(S) EXISTING 3000 GALLON SEPTIC TANK i EXISTING SEASONAL CREEK DRIVEWAY- . PARKING EXISTING /DRIVEWAY NG RN znd I 1 ojk BEAUSITE „ � LAKE ROAD i 40 e` of '' ,' "A i .° "%ek. - I certify the information heron was verified by inspection and the .1� .) system installation appears to have been completed In accordance �!r•. L.JA •BS t1 with the approved design except for the changes made during „� $ ' 't I NEA 1II installation as noted above and on the reverse. ExPi• s 1 r. n y Designers Stamp and Signature: °7//7((-4 02N z o C2 0 ]>to m W c D g � m _ N x• * 'r 2- s, N N ^. -I C] o g o V (r) R)3 C 1--1 N R O N ^ m ° N'd g a- a C+J m O o ^ O. G O °. E I ---r P'' -- . - m 5-'. a m - - • w m o F� _a. m S _E, m m 'I -I N N .w. n a .. N p, •• = g G. • a 0 r N, ^ P - ^ a W 1.4'r'.41 ruDITI N rn 5 P. a .-) nCy,) „c5 _ m a9 °� .d • Na m O o N�o I- z O 7 M v'.d a o m C„, m N' D • 2 < 5' S y' Pt 10 a m um, o co D CC G o rro c ry c c w (o m c .. a .,u IQ o n p v v o' ❑ w 5 co m a m,o,,m o 4:1'- 3. o c, ul n - c ,,,ti y a o ' m a :. a N o boa 5 ° o (P rt.) n,” ii, -- Q rp ry rt N g a A N o -r l+ N ]> n .y N p O N R co : ° = 6 a o g O n O N om 0- P O I (A co 75 • w Cy D �. s N o w' o �, E O ° Q a � 2G k% n° 0 n ❑ SO '°. 8R" 3 :xr,r,Q a m'� fl %ov b wti ° o ao' n FSI ,VIq io ° . d(rho s. e ❑ +>�mm rnu = (p V-o -w `�° a ? g � � °w m oP'. m aw o ' H n.o„ i ° •m 00D D Ii° o V,. o S r.. g.aa8 w �.o � a asa°- M� ' o `\ "�' X] .m Oro ,-n.m ati `' w °, o,,, yg w o nN '�' ry �' rn �N y :l `< won,°' '0 r.0. q -n. ow N '° 0 / _[-> I ' 1 ..7 ?D o o Z a ` ,- g m n ;0 S v o, '+,� o•NNC 0 -'d ° wm w w0 '^ Pte'.aw ' a .P r co 3 0 7 w �.0 5. a-° v »,0 m •'do S' o : ..PI . 9 5- Iv 0 r o c - 9H m °»,.- .`''.3 Z a \ti,.,,.,// ;A (- - / r i� oo - , N a o a to • ry O o.o V, y J .„'... 9�y ? ° q' I e31 IN) - I■ p o o a o y r, '^ Ip g o °:■(f o :° v c�' / r:)n, _---1 P, (� FA Hwy u, a ° �. w win . ,,-0.7 v' vm, .' a , ,1 / 'n'; I(_I , a' a,71 c 4, g g s < ro .- - `n F w g 0 75 a J C. /,', co 0 0 1 ) �I 4 a ' r-ra a. V a v a rc w !?....i..5 9 0 5 'O (U N r o w _ g , , )0 0 7 9 a o .7.1 6 y d f f / r4 Eli N' . ''rJ o .nr '°O b IiI 2.6 n re m to n 7 N Q Vr 2 Y ID 9 00° 10 /y ,, , o 8 0 in D om o m � °m A W A z N _ ? w a g i a , , ° ' ` i D 9 • AP p D Fl r A m n ° , k1 4 ' 0a a °^ " --- r9 10 aNzca,m I n(A Cl a 4>rr (b 0 mrr, wd (n co o ` = o n r,-I D ro ° -T°— -c II'�'II_--- / i � G N uuY 7 O/ 1 / 2,/- 0 r oP � 1 /� b L o , ., i / ./////' N Y O I--. _,t ,-t-o Iffil -1 a x"f) '_ r I U .c. /Jl rl c‘.. / XI P 0 / S: Q. O `f l tf N I. J ( bJ N 1 n - -IA / .of (0 o i p N % , n�? Lr.l L. 0 � I F-I i I < 1 L. , I �i 1(/) U I(0 • o c. I< g N\ �� h z ,6-o ii k. .-M, 1 1,.F,C.) f V S X C K M " . 0,11)UI P X D • ; I (- ) V d > U1 (0 F ' O� Uj i 0 x- -,, D , K l o N 11) m �Qr o u) �/,) SOW g_ y6t,' E1 / , CO �� z.. '.IS, C o / / P .ter- fg --� ,, / I`G O `� y^" ` v ,// / // / 3 SZ \ I)1In �( r� / N M/ 3 i) < c7 '19 H lF/�,i / / SD /0 GI J-11 14 Ca o ro ' / / f) b( \i / / // C)N :V/'o / / C.it PI i / -- // // N co N ▪ n to 0 x o Z o " D d7 !7 o (cD v 5 5 ma (nx ^.o- y mtn5 5 0. -i ) �o vg o v G) ° N 3 r�-r '-1 y �' ° n>; b '. 8' ... . n w V G w h ° ° w, C ° ° °' N °` �a rs`m a E m m - 4—1 °" 5 A `1 " t N Q, 'r •.•.{ d Q1 .a u » .nd.. 5' H @ ', 7 ' NDm D vci rn ° °' pynGJ � rr � m 7"' a3 d .o tnw p g -_�'(:_�' Z > > r, w m ro ry N' n n o` 7, c ,. a o-,n ,'� ii iiq N c L H F 911 b •° o N v' v a�[f?m = N n .. n e=• 3 N o c u U1 w 'd b d "a.! : n N a ° n<y 0. :. w (/) a'''.9. 'O a ' O V cr., ' n .• w _ ¢.Am Hu .. o �1 u,rn A A u W m, i p, O° '� m dW' rn J, ° 2 6 ° (v om H O J n U v_I n o - . t �. � a NI.", a. 7 TSB ru %.. _ o T 1 v, O w w a OZ CD n M. C. 6. „ c" N ° O XO F U a C m Lq rm , p3 n ❑ m n "pv' . Ran CN. y ° SO --Qa IA i m w n. o O d ry .�i' � n w 4'� o.v � V ° 7 °+' N V-0 (7,i - a ? v a o o Cl n A-oho °' Z" H ,o ^' ° m O CD D n o 0' o a =. 0 E m `g',,r n. ,5° ,'', �� .;. j j n �° 6, ry W °' w m o 0 w o' 4!T N°-9 d y° w `�' n ''' S - Res tones 3 Nm S ZJ 5 S ° q 4 d o m '< �.ac , " ° d r C a * o a ,P o , o '^ w p . d „' o � n n �0oa 0a ,-51-u '-' 17 .0 " `V!.8 _ p cl i aq ti ' u d 1 , � ucv III i n ,o g e o ff ro c ry m R ° w --- ,i, 1 I .b O � O I— ° � " y UI A R -4 " 11ry� ° / `^ fi11 ° rn n 7 ,9 °0, a'19 �c.,O Ul D H „ °' n n q m o^ . _ _ _- / r D w Say f0 ° 8' 0' � . _-__ •�' ADf'I r;CJ ti n' ° m Qd " "' vo c ` - ,9i6I c, mz c Dm .. - c2 e 'rs onxzr `z `° u, 1 7NCl C Arr oo p m m ri -< in`/'z V'f sA DD w`y CO OnW fV j �" � ' 5 �V �'....: ../. \ /o UI N N`< N o /to :v.: h cs- °- // -1 o x' ? r - in / f') a. -a G + f t-1 :(? o D p] rn A \ � p Ii D v 1 3 vi V) o I Q'" s r O I-1 N P <; I C 3 --1 ' I r' J L. .\ s. iFl-A f,. h 5 T X O]e1 Fri V7 N u.. Ul A X d 10 3 V UI 3 O Q..(] .a N I O - - < A 0 ......, ()C Q X �: / w OS O.. o m �aM h W ��.. �'///�`J�f�/ 3 Qj N(O Q 3 /7 / - / CO / /'Q. . .."*"..d p /, , / 6 0 I r - // ... ! J / '\'''''''''''.......-.--'''''.. ,-- -ri m-a \i, �.. �'O mo i / / °A N 3 1< LA W ry 3 N // i // '< O in ``� F / / / 1 .O O N (" ...i fr // f�ln / / r 3 SZ ` "I5 ur z i . 3 rU/ r / �," �A ;L�1v na / R1 / / n iii- 1.,�^' / �' O / cr / / 3 i t O 1° 'O i ii / / A // 2 Pcf ...�i 3°d1 / / / 1'll l of / / _ . ma //t 4 / / ' / /N ° "1 A /�/ / // / 0 .+3 / / d Cl Tl N SZ x / / / % n t, t(-:.}J 1- ...:.L Ij I 3 -5 x - ------"":,=%;;;;;;."-A / 3 U Ul `< //u /// / // ,c> II / i N 3 ru _.__._--- /// 3 A- _—---- -f .0- N co. JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street I Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.iefferson,wa.usicommunitydevelopment Tel: 360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcd co.iefferson.wa.us SquareONE Resource Center I Building Permits&Inspections Development Consistency Review'Long Range Planning Customer Assistance Meeting (CAM) Form Office Use Only Your Coach:Colleen Phone: Today's Date:05/21/2014 Email: Walk-In: Parcel Number(s):901273004 Time Tracking Zoning: Plat: IS Minutes Research Notes: Meeting The Camp is an approved use for camping facilities for disabled persons. Approved Conditional use permit MLA06-00045. Start Time End Time The proposal is to expand an existing 4 foot gravel path to an 8 foot asphalt Total Due path. The expansion is required to meet ADA requirements. See attached site Paid plan of the paths that are to be expanded. New SMP - Proposal is with shoreline jurisdiction. Environmental Designation is conservancy. The Camp is determined to be a water oriented use in conservancy designation and is "P" use - with limitations. JCC18.25.490(3)(a) requires the expansion of the path to show no net loss to the ecological functions or processes or have adverse an impact to the shoreline. JCC18.25.490(3)(i) clearing and grading requires a landscaping plan. A no net loss and landscaping plan will be required. This could be a HMP to meet both requirements. The proposal could be processed as a shoreline exemption. JCC18.25.060(1) if the fair market value does not exceed $6,416 or exemption (2) Maintenance and repair of existing trail. The trail is part of the approved conditional use. The expansion is required to meet ADA requirements. Did not answer questions regarding the deck replacement of a bridge that spans a "N" stream. A CAM fee will be required for further questions. PLEASE NOTE: Information and guidance provided through Customer Assistance is advisory only and is based on information provided by the customer. It is impossible for the meeting to be an exhaustive review of all potential issues.Any discussion or information provided shall not bind or prohibit the County's future implementation or enforcement of all applicable laws and regulations.No statements or assurances made by County representatives shall in any way relieve the applicant of his or her duty to submit an application consistent with all relevant requirements of County, state and federal codes,laws,regulations,land use plans,and other requirements. Wednesday,February 19,2014 JEFFERSON COUNTY s,_, -„: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY y. DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.jefferson.wa.uslcommunitvdevelopment Tel: 360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcd@co.iefferson.wa.us SquareONE Resource Center I Building Permits&Inspections I Development Review I Long Range Planning April 21, 2015 Dear Re er, RE: MLA15-00013 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: Existing trails at Camp Beausite are to be upgraded from 4 feet wide to 8 feet wide paved trails in order to meet ADA requirements. No further expansion will occur other than the widening of the existing trails. Stormwater Management Permit and Shoreline Exemption Location: Parcel Number: 901273004; Site Address: 510 Beausite Lake Road, Chimacum WA, 98325; Section: 27, Township: 29N, Range: 1W. Comments must be received within fourteen (14) calendar days or by May 5, 2015. If no written response has been received within fourteen (14) days, your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary, the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact at (360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Anna Bausher Anna Bausher cc:, \\tidemark\data\forms\F_M LT_ReviewerLtr.rpt 4/21/2015 CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR Parcel 901284002 Printed: March 19, 2015 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type BLD94-00421 NORTHWEST KIWANIS CAMP F Application Received: 6/27/1994 Permit Issued/Case closed: 7/7/1994 Case Finaled: 10/31/1994 Residential Alteration No findings, conditions, or permissions found. BLD95-00357 NORTHWEST KIWANIS CAMP F Application Received: 6/27/1995 Permit Issued/Case closed: 7/6/1995 Case Finaled: 8/3/1998 Change of use: commercial alteration; replace deck; change doors 1.) Potable water is to be brought onto the site. 2.) Smoke detecters are to be installed in the meeting areas. BLD97-00096 NORTHWEST KIWANIS CAMP F Application Received: 2/14/1997 Permit Issued/Case closed: 2/18/1997 Case Finaled: 3/7/1997 PROPANE TANK INS IALLAI ION No findings, conditions, or permissions found. CAR99-00036 NORTHWEST KIWANIS CAMP F Application Received: 2/3/1999 Permit Issued/Case closed: 3/22/1999 Case Finaled: 3/22/1999 New alternative septic system. No findings, conditions, or permissions found. OTH96-00117 NORTHWEST KIWANIS CAMP P Application Received: 7/11/1996 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP99-00019 NORTHWEST KIWANIS CAMP F Application Received: 2/3/1999 Permit Issued/Case closed: 6/25/1999 Case Finaled: 6/7/2002 Now filed w/SEP08-75 a modification adding a new transport line. 1.) Waste Strength (BOD,TSS, Grease and oils) is to be monitored twice annually during the summer months when the facility is in use. Responsibility is that of the owner. Results are to be submitted to the Jefferson County Health Dept. 2.) Per the design, if the dishwashing machine uses heat for disinfection or a garbage disposal is used the system size will need to be increased. Use of this equipment will invalidate this permit. 3.) The existing septic system must be abandoned prior to final inspection 4.) The non plated road the transport line is installed in can not be used as a driven way unless the transport line is double cased or equivallent. 5.) Performance monitoring schedule for treatment systems followed by reduced sized drainfield/infiltrative area shall be :1) Two times per year(once every six months)during the first and second year following installation. 2)One time per year beginning with the third year following installation. 3) In response to complaints or problems. Observation ports to the bottom of the trench are to be installed in at least two places on each drainfield line: One within 10 feet of the beginning of each line and one within 10 feet of the end of each line. 6.) Exceeding the permitted design flow of 2900 gal/day shall constitute a violation of this permit. Water usage monitoring shall be conducted daily for the first two months of use&weekly during the summer months thereafter. These monitoring results shall be submitted to the Jefferson County Health Dept. 7.) WAC 246-272 REQUIRES ANNUAL MONITORING OF THE ONSITE SEWAGE SYSTEM WHEN IT IS SERVING A FOOD SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT. 8.) MAXIMUM TRENCH DEPTH 6 INCHES 9.) Setbacks to the public well is 100' required from drainfield and reserve areas. 100' required from tanks Sandfilter, and effluent transport lines. 10.) The 3000 gal septic tank and any other tank constructed on site must be 24hr leak tested and certified by the designer. 11.) Curtain Drain required a minimum of 10' upgradient of primary and reserve drainfields. Depth of curtain drain is 36 inches or 6 inches into compacted soil. 12.) AS PER WAC 246-272 ALL ALTERNATIVE SYSTEMS REQUIRE MONITORING. THIS MONITORING IS PROVIDED BY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE JEFFERSON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION AND THE JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT#1. THIS SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM WILL REQUIRE AN ACTIVE MONITORING CONTRACT WITH THE PUD#1 PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM. 13.) Health Dept. required to observe pressure test, 48 hour notice to be given. 14.) Dry season installation required. 15.) Low use water fixtures required, 1.6 gal.flush toilets and 2.5 gpm shower heads. 16.) All components of the septic system are to be completely protected from vehicular traffic or mechanical disturbance. Protective barriers may be required around the sandfilter&drainfield. \\tidemarkldata\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 3/19/2015 Page 1 of 14 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 17.) Drainlines are to be installed along the natural contours. 18.) Contact designer prior to installation for staking of drainfield area. 19.) Dose counters are required in the control panel for all drainfield components. 20.) Divert all sources of drainage, including roof drains away from septic tank and drainfield area. 21.) Any portion of transport line under a driven way is to be double cased or equivalent. 22.) Approval/issuance of a sewage disposal permit does not guarantee the approval of other development or a building permit on this site. Compliance with other Jefferson County and Washington State Codes is required. 23.) Approval of this sewage disposal permit does not preclude the permit holder from complying with the Critical Areas Ordinance for other development on the site. 24.) This onsite sewage system is designed for domestic strength waste water only. Disposal of any other waste streams is considered a violation of this permit. 25.) Risers are required to grade with secured lids over the inlet and outlet of the septic tank. Minimum 24"riser over inlet. ZON95-00016 KIWANIS CLUB OF PORT TOWI■ F J SMITH Application Received: 5/2/1995 Permit Issued/Case closed: 10/14/1996 Case Finaled: 12/13/1999 Establish comprehensive camping facility at Beausite Lake to meet the needs of organizations in Western Washington and British Columbia.There would be a maximum of 60 persons(25 children, 25 counselors and 10 other staff)at one time. With the next three years, the tent platforms would be replaced with small cabins for sleeping. Long-range plans include construction of a lodge,to provide kitchen, dining room and meeting space. The existing house would be demolished at the time of Lodge construction. The lodge will be designed to provide support services for up to 60 persons. Maximum group size using the entire facility, lodge and sleeping cabins will be limited to 60 persons. 1.) 1. Prior to final approval, the applicant shall prepare a final site plan which is consistent with the requirements of Jefferson County Code Section 18.40.050. The final site plan shall be formatted in such a manner that upon its recording it will be a binding site plan. 2.) 2. Prior to final approval, a sign plan shall be prepared and submitted to the County for review and approval. The plan shall be consistent with County Policies and Sign regulations. 3.) 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall document that water and sewage disposal methods for the camping facility is in compliance with applicable State and County requirements for the proposed type of development. 4.) 4. The applicant shall provide written documentation that necessary health services will be provided during those periods when the Northwest Kiwanis Camp will be serving"physically, mentally, and emotionally challenged persons". 5.) 5. The applicant shall submit an approved Fire Protection Plan to the local fire protection district for review and approval. 6.) 6. The applicant shall document the method of preserving trees and other wildlife habitat. 7.) 7. The applicant shall submit a detailded trail plan for review and approval. 8.) 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the new lodge, the applicant shall submit an off-street parking plan for review and approval. 9.) 9. The applicant shall submit an engineered drainage and storm water plan and report to the Jefferson County Deparment of Public Works for review and approval. The drainage plan shall incorporate the storm drainage criteria of the Washington State Department of Ecology, Storm Water Management Manual (current edition). The plan shall be of sufficient detail to clearly illustrate that the"Best Management Practices"utilized are aduquate to treat and control the runoff. Drainage calculations which support the plan shall be included with the plan. [NOTE:This is also Mitigation Measure No. 1 from the Final MDNS.] 10.) 10. The applicant shall enter into a Maintenance Agreement for Drainage and Storm Water Facilities with Jefferson County to ensure that the drainage system as approved by the Department of Public Works,will be maintained in accordance with the plans approved by Jefferson County. [NOTE: This is also Mitigation Measure No. 3 from the Final MDNS.] 11.) 11. Prior to the commencement of any land disturbing activities on the site, an erosion and sediment control plan shall be developed to the standars of the Washington State Department of Ecology Storm Water Management Manual (current edition)and be submitted to the County Department of Public Works for review and approval. Approved temporary erosion and sedimentation control "Best Management Practices"shall be employed during land disturbing activities. An approved set of plans shall be on site during construction. [NOTE: This is also Mitigation Measure No. 2 from the Final MDNS.] 12.) 12. The applicant shall submit plans for construction of roads, storm water facilities, and/or land disturbing activities to the Department of Public Works for review and approval in accordance with the Departments plan review schedule. 13.) 13. The applicant shall notify the Department of Public Works during various phases of construction in accordance with the Department's Inspection schedule. 14.) 14. All easements of record shall be graphically portrayed on the site plan with the Auditor's File Number (AFN)of the easement(s)also referenced on the face of the site plan. 15.) 15. In accordance with Ordinance 12-1214-92, effective January 1, 1993, the applicant shall pay all costs for work incidental to approval before final approval is granted. 16.) 16. Site Plan Approval, Director's Signature: Upon verification that all conditions have been met,the applicant shall submit a final mylar of the conceptual site plan to the Department THREE DAYS in advance of approval by the Director of Public Works. 1\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 3/19/2015 Page 2 of 14 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 17.) 17. The applicant may enter into a surety agreemnet with the Department of Public Works as an alternative to complete installation of required improvements prior to site plan approval. The surety may not exceed on (1)year, and must be in a form acceptable to the County Prosecuter.Acceptable examples of sureties are available from the Department of Public Works. All sureties must be accompanied by an estimate of the cost of all improvements and the estimate must be approved by the Department of Public Works prior to acceptance of surety. 18.) 18. Prior to final approval, the draft agreement between Jefferson County and the Northwest Kiwanis Camp regarding sharing expenditures for improvements to Beausite Lake Road shall be finalized. 19.) 19. The mitigation Measures contained in the Final MDNS shall be completed. 20.) 20. The proponent shall submit an engineered drainage and storm water plan and report to the Jefferson County Department of Publci Works for review and approval. The drainage plan shall incorporate the storm drainage criteria of the Washington State Department of Ecology Storm Water Management Manual (current edition). The plan shall be of sufficient detail to clearly illustrate the"Best Management Practices" utilized are adequate to treat and control the runoff. Drainage calculations which support the plan shall be included with the plan. 21.) 21. Prior to commencement of any land disturbing activities on the site, and erosion and sediment control plan shall be developed to the standards of the Washington State Department of Ecology Storm Water Management Manual (current edition)and submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Temporary erosion control Best Management Practices shall be implemented at all times during land disturbing activities. An approved set of plans shall be kept on the site during construction. 22.) 22. The proponent shall enter into a Maintenance agreement for Drainage and Storm Water Facilities with Jefferson County to ensure that the drainage system as approved by the Department fo Public Works, will be maintained in accordance with the plans approved by Jefferson County. 23.) 23. Buffer areas shall be required to provide sufficient separation between the designated wetland(s)and the adjacent proposed project. The wetland adjacent to Beausite Lake has been classified as a class 1 wetland. A wetland buffer of 75 feet shall be established for this wetland. For the three(3)acre wetland classified as a class II wetland, a wetland buffer of 50 feet shall be established. The wetland located southwest of Beausite Lake has been classified as a class IV wetland. A wetland buffer of 25 feet shall be established for this wetland.All buffers shall be measured perpendicularly from the wetland boundary as surveyed in the field. 24.) 24. Buffers shall remain naturally vegetated except where the vegetation has been disturbed, invaded by highly undesireable species(e.g., noxious weeds), or would substantially benefit from the increased diversity of introduced plant species. Where buffer disturbance has occured during construction, replanting with native vegetation to enhance views and removal of undesireable species(e.g., alders)may be permitted by the Critical Areas Administrator on a case by case basis. 25.) 25. Buffer marking. A permanent physical separation along the upland boundary of each wetland buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. such separation may consist of logs, a tree or hedge row, or other prominent physical marking approved by the Critical Areas Administrator. 26.) 26. Buffer marking. Buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or ever one hundred(100)feet,whichever is less. Signs shall remian in place prior to and during approved construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: 'Wetland & Buffer-Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 27.) 27. Buffer marking. A notice to title shall be recorded with the Auditor, using the form approved by the Jefferson County Prosecuting Attorney. 28.) 28. Buffer Marking. In the case of a binding site plan, the appllicant shall include on the face of any such instrument the boundary of the wetland and its buffer. 29.) 29. Buffer marking. The applicant may also choose to dedicate the buffer through a conservation easement or deed restriction that shall be recorded with the Jefferson County Auditor. Such easements or restrictions shall, however, use the forms approved by the Jefferson County Prosecuting Attorney. 30.) 30. Wetland Buffer Enhancement. To the greatest extent possible, project final design shall attempt to locate the proposed trail outside of wetlands and their buffers. 31.) 31. Wetland Buffer Enhancement. In order to minimize impacts on the buffer of the isolated forested wetland on the east side of Beausite Lake, the proposed trail location and barriers should be designed to keep people on the trail as much as possible. Downed logs may be used to direct pedestrian traffic. In addition,the use of educational displays should be incorporated to demarcate and explain the importance of wetlands and their buffers. 32.) 32. Wetland Enhancement. If alterations are to be made to the class IV wetland, the Scot's Broom shall be removed and replaced with native vegetation. Improving the habitat would encourage greater use by wildlife and wildlife, as well as increase the aesthetics of the site. Recommended plantings include hazelnut trees (Corylus cornuta), gooseberries (Ribes SP), or serviceberry(Amelanchier alnifolia). 33.) 33. Streamside Buffer. A buffer shall be established along each side of the unnamed stream located on the project site. The buffer shall be at least 15 feet in width. The buffer areas shall be required to provide sufficient separation between the designated stream and the adjacent proposed project. 34.) 34. Streamside Buffer. Buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Where buffer disturbance has occurred during construction, replanting with native vegetation shall be required. 35.) 35. Streamside Buffer. Buffers shall be retained in their natural condition, however, minor pruning of vegetation to enhance views may be permitted by the Critical Areas Administrator on a case by case basis. 36.) 36. Streamside Buffer. All buffers shall be measured perpendicularly from the ordinary high water mark, or the top of the bank where the ordinary high water mark cannot be identified. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 3/19/2015 Page 3 of 14 Cases Name Review Status P lanner Type 37.) 37. Streamside Buffer. Streams with adjacent riparian wetland habitats shall be subject to the buffer widths which apply to their wetland class or the standard streamside buffer widths set forth in the Jefferson County Interim Critical Areas Ordinance, Section 10.507.7,whichever is more restrictive. 38.) 38. Streamside Buffer. All trees and understory lying outside of road rights of way and utility easements shall be retained during clearing for the roadways and utilities: Provided that understory damaged during approved clearing operations may be pruned. 39.) 39. Streamside Buffer. Damage to vegetation retained during initial clearing activities shall be minimized by directional felling of trees to avoid critical areas and vegetation to be retained. 40.) 40. Streamside Buffer. Retained trees, understory and stumps may subsequently be cleared only if such clearing is necessary to complete the proposal involved in the application. 41.) 41. Streamside Buffer. A permanent physical separation along the boundary of the streamside buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation may consist of logs, a tree or hedge row, or other prominent physical marking approved by the Jefferson County Critical Areas Administrator. 42.) 42. Streamside Buffer. Buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred (100)feet, whichever is less. Signs shall remain in place prior to and during approved construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Streamside Buffer- Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Native Vegetation." 43.) 43. Streamside Buffer. A notice to title shall be recorded with the Jefferson County in a form approved by the Jefferson County Prosecuting Attorney. 44.) 44. Streamside Buffer. In the case of a binding site plan, the applicant shall include the boundary of the streamside buffer area on the face of any such instrument. 45.) 45. Streamside Buffer. The applicant may also choose to dedicate the buffer through a conservation easement or deed restricion that shall be recorded with the Jefferson County Auditor. Such easements or restrictions shall, however, use forms approved by the Jefferson County Prosecuting Attorney. 46.) 46. Eagle Nest and Habitat. Prior to the issuance of any permits to construct structures or any clearing activity within close proximity to the eagle nest on the subject site, the applicant shall obtain an Eagle Management Plan with the Washington State Department of Wildlife. CAM14-00324 STANDLEY I M Colleen Zmolek Application Received: 5/22/2014 Permit Issued/Case closed: 5/22/2014 Case Finaled: Existing 4 foot gravel path replace with 8 foot asphalt to comply with ADA requirements No findings, conditions, or permissions found. CAM15-00073 SUE NA M Joel Peterson Application Received: 2/12/2015 Permit Issued/Case closed: 2/12/2015 Case Finaled: Is the wetland habitat management plan still valid for another project? Is the Conditional Use permit still valid? No findings, conditions, or permissions found. ZON06-00006 MLA06-00045 NORTHWEST KIWANIS CAMP II A Mo-chi Lindblad Application Received: 2/6/2006 Permit Issued/Case closed: 8/14/2006 Case Finaled: Phased development to establish a comprehensive camping facility at Beausite Lake for children and adults with special needs. Upon completion of the project, there would be a maximum of 120 persons, including campers, counselors and other staff at one time during peak season. Phase One of the proposal is to construct sleeping quarters and restroom facilities. Long range plans include construction of a lodge, commercial kitchen, dining room and meeting space. The Administrator has identified this application as an Unnamed Institutional Use in Table 3-1 of the Jefferson County Code Title 18.15.040 subject to a Discretionary Use process. The proposal is subject to the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)review. 1.) The installed septic system is designed for proposed phase one use, HOWEVER,the scale of the use proposed and the current loading of the septic system is unknown, therefore, no approval is being given or implied that the septic system has the capacity for proposed increase use. It is also not known at this time if the septic system will have the capacity for phase two of the proposal. Applicant must begin water monitoring immediately and have waste strength testing done prior to building application. Please contact your septic system designer for help with the above. For verification of water availablility the water system operator must contact the State Department of Health with the proposal and determine if system is adequate. Contact Simon Tung at 360-664-8734 2.) Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall document that water and sewage disposal methods for the camping facility is in compliance with applicable State and County requirements for the proposed type of development. 3.) It is the determination of the Administrator that this permit shall be valid for five(5)years. 4.) A conditional use permit automatically expires and becomes void if the applicant fails to file for a building permit or other necessary development permit within five(5)years of the effective date(the date of the decision granting the permit)of the permit unless the permit approval provides for a greater period of time. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 3/19/2015 Page 4 of 14 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 5.) In the event that the permits for all phases have not been applied for within the five(5)years prior to expiration, applicant and/or developer may choose to apply for a Binding Site Plan in order to vest the remaining development of each phase prior to expiration of the conditional use permit. 6.) Extensions to the duration of the original permit approval are prohibited. The Department of Community Development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of an impending expiration. 7.) The County may modify an approved conditional use permit as follows:the County may delete, modify or impose additional conditions upon finding that the use for which the approval was granted has been intensified, changed or modified by the property owner or by person(s)who control the property without approval so as to significantly impact surrounding land uses.A modification will be processed as a Type II land use decision pursuant to Chapter 18.40.270 JCC. 8.) The County may suspend or revoke an approved conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 18.50 JCC only upon finding that: a. The use for which the approval was granted has been abandoned for a period of at least one(1)year; b. Approval of the permit was obtained by misrepresentation of material fact; or c. The permit is being exercised contrary to the terms of approval. 9.) In appropriate circumstances, the Administrator may require a reasonable performance or maintenance assurance device, in a form acceptable to the County Prosecutor, to assure compliance with the provisions of this Code and the conditional use permit as approved. 10.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on December 30, 2005 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code(UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property:Two Type 5 Streams, Eagle Habitat Areas,Wetlands and Seismic Hazard Areas. 11.) Geologically Hazardous Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by slope, soil type, geologic material, and groundwater that may combine to create problems with slope stability, erosion, and water quality during and after construction or during natural events such as earthquakes or severe rainstorms. 12.) Jefferson County has determined that the use of real property for agriculture and forestry operations is a high priority and favored use in the county. The county will not consider to be a nuisance those inconveniences or discomforts arising from such operations, if such operations are consistent with commonly accepted best management practices in compliance with local, state, and federal laws. If your real property includes or is within five hundred (500)feet of real property designated as Rural Residential 1:10 or 1:20, Rural Industrial, Rural Commercial, Agriculture, or Forestry, you may be subject to inconveniences or discomforts arising from such farming and forestry operations, including but not limited to noise, tree removal, odors,flies,fumes, dust, smoke, the operation of farm and forestry machinery during any 24-hour period, the storage and disposal or manure, and the application of permitted fertilizers and permitted pesticides. One or more of these inconveniences may occur as a result of agricultural and forestry operations which are in conformance with existing laws and regulations. 13.) The property is located within the documented Beausite Lake Bald Eagle Nesting Territory. 14.) Two Type 5 Streams(Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area) have been identified on the subject property. The stream will require a setback of 50-feet. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM). Fish and Wildlife Habitat Areas shall also have Buffers and Building Setbacks established. 15.) Buffers are areas that shall be maintained in their natural condition, however, minor pruning or alteration of vegetation may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished. 16.) Among the native conifer species which may be used in buffers or for re-vegetation include, but are not limited to: Grand Fir(Aibes grandis), Sitka Spruce (Picea Sitchensis), Shore Pine(Pinus Contorta), Douglas Fir(Pseudotsuga Menziesii),Western Red Cedar(Thuja Plicata), and Western Hemlock(Tsuga Heterophylla). Among native tree species which may be used includes:Vine Maple(Acer Circinatum), Big-Leaf Maple(Acer Macrophyllum), Red Alder(Alnus Rubra), Pacific Madrone(Arbutus Menziesii), Quaking Aspen(Populus Tremula), Black Cottonwood (Populus Trichocarpa), Bitter Cherry(Prunus Emarginata), Oregon White Oak(Quercus Garryana), Cascara(Rhamnus Purshiana), Pacific Willow(Saliz Lasiandra), and Scouler's Willow(Saliz Scouleriana). Among the native shrub species which may be used are: Sevice-Berry(Amalanchier Alnifolia), Red Osier Dogwood (Cornus Stolonifera)Salal (Gaultheria Shallon), Ocean Spray(Holodiscus Discolor), Indian Plum (Oemlaria Cerasiformis), Pacific Ninebark(Physocarpus Capitus), Red Flowering Currant(Ribes Sanguineum), Wild Rose (Rosa Nutkana), Swamp Rose(Rosa Pisocarpa),Willows (Salix ssp.), Red Elderberry(Sambucus Racemosa), Snowberry(Symphoricarpos Albus), Evergreen Huckleberry(Vaccinium Ovatum), Red Huckleberry(Vaccinium Parvifolium). 17.) A setback of 150-feet, measured perpendicularly from the Category I wetland edge(the wetland to the east and adjacent to Beausite Lake, shall be permanently maintained as a buffer. No filling, grading, clearing, or other alteration of the wetland or its buffer is allowed. 18.) A setback of 100-feet, measured perpendicularly from the Category II wetland edge approximately 150 ft southeast of Beausite Lake), shall be permanently maintained as a buffer. No filling, grading,clearing, or other alteration of the wetland or its buffer is allowed. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 3/19/2015 Page 5 of 14 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 19.) A setback of 25-feet, measured perpendicularly from the Category IV wetland edge(southwest of Beausite Lake), shall be permanently maintained as a buffer. No filling, grading,clearing, or other alteration of the wetland or its buffer is allowed. 20.) Buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred (100) feet, whichever is less. Signs shall contain the following statement: "Wetland & Buffer-Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 21.) A permanent physical separation along the upland boundary of the wetland buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation can include installing logs, trees, a hedgerow, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 22.) The identified Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area(Type 5 Streams), shall maintain a vegetative buffer setback of 50-feet. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM)to the proposed development. 23.) An additional setback of five(5)feet is required from the edge of the buffer area to the proposed development. 24.) A permanent physical separation along the boundary of the buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation can include installing logs,trees, a hedgerow,or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 25.) Buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred(100) feet,whichever is less. Signs shall be in place prior to and during construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Buffer- Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 26.) The applicant shall fully adhere to all conditions and requirements of the approved Eagle Habitat Management Plan. 27.) Reviewed under the State Environmental PolicyAct(SEPA)by Jefferson County Department of Community Development Develpmrnt Review Division acting as lead agency. Determination of Non-Significance(DNS) issued on August 14, 2006. 28.) The revised site plan as submitted on July 11, 2006 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped,approved site plan dated August 14, 2006 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 29.) This approval is for a phased development to establish a comprehensive camping facility at Beausite Lake only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 30.) A Wetland Delineation Special Report dated July 1995 was submitted in conjunction with the application to address the on site wetlands. 31.) The proposal includes the construction of more than 7,500 square feet of impervious surface for buildings and parking areas. Sections 6.6 and 6.7 of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code requires proponents for developments that meet these criteria to implement a Stormwater Site Plan that complies with Minimum Requirements#1-#10.Minimum Requirements of the Washington Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. 32.) Prior to issuance of a building permit or commencing land disturbing activity, the proponent is required to submit a Stormwater Site Plan to the Public Works Department for review and approval. 33.) The proposal is to moderately expand a recreational facility that was designed to accommodate a total of 60 special needs campers and staff.The expansion would increase the use to a total of 120 persons. Campers and staff would typically arrive at the site at approximately the same time, stay for approximately a week, and leave at approximately the same time. Many of the campers and staff arrive by bus, not by individual vehicles. Public Works Department finds that the proposal would slightly increase the traffic generated by the facility.There would be very little traffic generated by the proposal outside of the arrival and departure periods. 34.) Beausite Lake Road has a 16 feet wide traveled way from West Valley Road to Mile Post 0.50 and a 12 feet wide traveled way from Mile Post 0.50 to its terminus at Mile Post 0.71. It is signed for a 20 miles per hour speed limit and as a primitive road.The existing ADT is 20. In order to accommodate the previous development of the recreational facility, the Public Works Department and the Kiwanis Club cooperated to construct turnouts. The traffic generated by the proposal would not increase the ADT to a level requiring a higher design standard. 35.) Public Works Department concludes that the proposal will not have a significant effect on Beausite Lake Road or the County Road system. 36.) In order to meet the requirements of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code and the Stormwater Management Manual Minimum Requirement#10 Operation and Maintenance and to ensure that the approved stormwater management facilities are appropriately maintained for the life of the project, Jefferson County requires the proponent to enter into a Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement with the County. Prior to final approval of the project, the Department will send a copy of the Agreement that has been signed by the Public Works Director to the applicant. The Department cannot give final approval for the project until the Agreement has been signed by the proponent and filed with the Jefferson County Auditor and the original agreement has been submitted to the Department. 37.) After construction is complete, the proponent shall submit a letter from the project engineer certifying that the stormwater management facilities have been constructed as per the approved plans.The Department cannot give final approval for the project until this certification has been received. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 3/19/2015 Page 6 of 14 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 38.) Construction of roads, storm water facilities, and/or land disturbing activities requires that the proponent submit plans for review by the Public Works Department. The proponent shall request inspections by the Public Works Department during various phases of construction. Typically the following inspections are required: - Installation of temporary erosion and sediment control measures; -Clearing and road subgrade preparation; -Application of gravel base; -Application of crushed surfacing top course; -Construction of storm water management facilities; - Final review. 1\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 3/19/2015 Page 7 of 14 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 39.) Chapter 18.15.040(2)JCC sets out the criteria for the Administrator's Decision. The Administrator may classify the discretionary use as an allowed "YES" use in the particular district affected, only if the proposed development complies with the following: 1. Complies with the applicable development standards of Chapter 18.30 JCC. This application is to utilize an existing camping facility for disabled persons; the new facilities will enhance the camping experience... Staff Comment: Jefferson County Environmental Health Department commented on the application on April 17, 2006. The installed septic system (SEP99-00019) has a 2900 gallon-per-day system. It is designed for proposed phase one use, however, the scale of the use proposed and the current loading of the septic system is unknown, therefore, no approval is being given or implied that the septic system has the capacity for proposed increase use. It is also not known at this time if the septic system will have the capacity for phase two of the proposal. Applicant must begin water monitoring immediately and have waste strength testing done prior to building permit application. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact a licensed septic system designer on the above. For verification of water availability the water system operator must contact the State Department of Health with the proposal and determine if system is adequate. Contact Simon Tung at(360)664-8734. Jefferson County Department of Public Works commented on the application March 6, 2006. Department of Public Works found that the proposal is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts related to erosion, sedimentation and stormwater run-off. The proposal shall also have minimal impact on Beausite Lake Road or the County Road System. No other comment was received during the public comment period that ended on March 8, 2006. 2. Complies with the performance and use-specific standards unique to the proposed use specified in Chapter 18.20 JCC. Staff Comment: The applicant shall adhere to all conditions on the Type II Land Use Permit issued by Jefferson County. 3. Is appropriate in design, character, and appearance with the goals and policies for the land use designation and district in which the proposed use is located. Staff Comment: The proposed use is located inside of the Parks, Preserve and Recreation (PPR) use district. The proposed phased camping facility will utilize the existing natural environment and to provide services to children and adults with special needs. 4. Is consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the applicable regulations of the Shoreline Master Program if the application involves property located within the jurisdiction of the state Shoreline Management Act, but does not require a shoreline permit; Staff Comment: The subject property is not within a shoreline jurisdiction and therefore is not subject to review under the Shoreline Master Program/Shoreline Management Act. The proposed use complies with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. 5. Will be served by adequate facilities including access, fire protection,waste and sewer facilities; Staff Comment: The road approach is existing and an address of 510 Beausite Lake Rd has been assigned to the parcel, the approved Site Plan with Parking dated April 14, 2004 indicates all ingress or egress to the parking area shall be developed so vehicles entering and leaving the premise are traveling in a forward motion onto Oak Bay Road. 6. Does not include any use or activity that would result in the siting of an incompatible use adjacent to an airport or airfield; Staff Comment: The proposed expansion of an existing camping facility is not in conflict with an existing airport or airfield. 7. Shall not adversely impact the public health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the County; Staff Comment: The expansion of the exist 40.) Any lighting must be of direct cutoff design and not extend beyond the property boundaries. 41.) Recreational areas shall be located so as to protect adjacent properties from adverse impacts. Where the proposed recreational use can reasonably be expected to have adverse impacts on adjacent properties, and where existing ground cover, such as trees or shrubs, will not provide an adequate buffer between the recreational area and adjoining properties, screening or fencing will be required. 1\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 3/19/2015 Page 8 of 14 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 42.) The Administrator has identified this application as an Unnamed Institutional Use in Table 3-1 of Chapter 18.15.040 Jefferson County Code(JCC) subject to a Discretionary Use process. The proposal is subject to the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) review. The application was deemed complete on February 16, 2006. The application was noticed in the Jefferson-Port Townsend Leader on February 22, 2006 in accordance with the notification requirements stipulated in Chapter 18.40 Article Ill JCC. The application was reviewed against the criteria of Chapter 18.15.40 JCC. The Administrator classified the discretionary use as an allowed "Yes" use, subject to the criteria described below. 43.) Any trash or garbage receptacles must be screened from view from surrounding properties. 44.) Any restroom facilities must be screened from view from surrounding properties and the entrance must be fully visible from the public areas. 45.) This parcel has been designated as Parks, Preserves and Recreation (PPR) under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 46.) S EPA(see below). 47.) The conditional use permit application and environmental checklist were determined to be substantially complete February 16, 2006. 48.) Notice of Type II Land Use Application and Pending SEPA Determination (MLA06-00045)was published in the February 22, 2006 edition of the Port Townsend Leader. 49.) Notice of Type II Land Use Application and Pending SEPA Determination (MLA06-00045)was mailed February 20, 2006 to adjacent property owners, agencies, applicant/representative, newspaper and posted at the official posting places. 50.) The Notice of Type II Land Use Application and Pending SEPA Determination (MLA06-00045)was published in the February 22, 2006 edition of the Jefferson County Port Townsend Leader and requested comments to be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on March 8, 2006 AND that the Department expects to issue a DNS for this proposal. The Notice futher states that"This will be the only opportunity to make comments related to SEPA. There will not be another comment period after the threshold (final)SEPA determination is made." 51.) Development Review Staff conducted a site inspection on February 24, 2006. 52.) Staff requested review and comments on the Environmental Checklist from numerous agencies including Jefferson County Department of Environmental Health, Jefferson County Department of Public Works, Jefferson County Assessor, Jefferson County Fire Protection District#1, City of Port Townsend, Department of Ecology SEPA Review, Washington State Fish amd Wildlife SEPA Review, Washington State Department of Natural Resources SEPA Review, Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe and Port Gamble S'kallam Tribe. Jefferson County Department of Public Works commented on the application March 3, 2006 and are hereby incorporated by reference. No comments were received from any adjacent property owners. 1\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 3/19/2015 Page 9 of 14 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 53.) Summary of Significant Environmental Comments: EARTH: The proposal includes the construction of more than 7,500 square feet of impervious surface for buildings and parking areas. The Jefferson County Unified Development Code requires proponents for development that meet these criteria to implement a Stormwater Site Plan that meets the Minimum Requirements of the Washington Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. Based on Public Works Department, the proposal is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts related to erosion and sedimentation. WATER: Surface: The proposal is within the immediate vicinity of Beausite Lake and associated wetlands. Beausite Lake is about 15 acres in size and contains four classes of associated wetlands. An unnamed creek that feeds into Chimacum Creek is also located in the vicinity of the proposal site. The proposed development will maintain the required buffer. Applicants shall work closely with Public Works Department to obtain an approved Stormwater Site plan. The proposal is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts related to stormwater run-off. Additional analysis of the proposal and its effect related to surface water is not necessary. Groundwater: The UDC mapping indicates that the site is not located within a Susceptible aquifer recharge area; a Special Aquifer Recharge Protection Area(SARPA)&a Commercial (COMM)aquifer recharge area. The proposal does not include groundwater withdrawal on-site. The commercial expansion will rely on PUD#1 for water. Washington State Department of Ecology has approved the water system. An on-site septic system SEP99-00019) will serve the parcel. Additional analysis of the proposal and its effect related to Groundwater is not necessary. Water Run-Off(including stormwater): Based on the applicant's compliance with the Minimum Requirements of the Washington Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, the Department recommends finding that the proposal is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts related to stormwater runoff. No mitigation measures are proposed. Additional analysis of the proposal and its effects related to Water is not necessary. PLANTS: Existing vegetation consists of alder, maple, fir, cedar, shrubs and native grasses. Proposed development site had been cleared and removal of native vegetation is minimal. No mitigation measures are proposed. Additional analysis of the proposal and its effects related to PLANTS is not necessary. ANIMALS: An ESA check was conducted and an eagle nest has been identified within 1000 feet of Beausite lake's shoreline. Proponents shall adhere to the approved Bald Eagle Management Plan by Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. No mitigation measures are recommended. Additional analysis of the proposal and its effects related to Animals is not necessary. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH: No mitigation measures are recommended. Additional analysis of the proposal and its effects related to Environmental Health is not necessary. LAND/SHORELINE USE: The site is designated as PPR under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The site located within 200 feet of the lake shoreline. Proposed development is not located within the shoreline jurisdiction. No mitigation measures are recommended. Additional analysis of the proposal and its effects related to Land/Shoreline Use is not necessary. HISTORICAL& CULTURAL PRESERVATION: No significant adverse environmental impacts have been identified. No mitigation measures are recommended. Additional analysis of the proposal and its effects related to Historical and cultural Preservation is not necessary. TRANSPORTATION: The proposal is to moderately expand a recreational facility that was designed to accommodate a total of 60 special needs campers and staff. The expansion would inc 54.) In accordance with the Jefferson County Fee Schedule Ordinance, the Public Works Department charges an hourly fee for application and plan reviews, project inspections, meetings, hearings, and final review.The proponent shall pay all fees incidental to the project prior to final approval. In the event that approval for the proposal is denied by Jefferson County or the proponent does not complete the proposal, the proponent shall still be responsible for paying the Department's fees. The Department's fee is currently$59 per hour. 55.) No use shall be made of equipment or material which produces unreasonable vibration, noise, dust, smoke, odor, or electrical interference to the detriment of the quiet use and enjoyment of adjoining property. 56.) Parking areas associated with recreational areas shall be located inland away from the water and shall be designed to control surface runoff and prevent the pollution of nearby water bodies. Safe access from parking areas to recreation areas shall be provided by means of walkways or other suitable facilities. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 3/19/2015 Page 10 of 14 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 57.) As outlined in Chapter 18.40.420 JCC, the applicant requesting a code interpretation may appeal the decision to the Hearing Examiner within fourteen (14)calendar days of the decision using the process for appeals of Type II permit decisions as set forth in Chapter 18.40.360 JCC. Appeals must be received at the Department of Community Development with the applicable fee by 4:00 PM on the last business day of the appeal period or no later than August 28, 2006. The notice of appeal shall contain a concise statement identifying: i. The decision being appealed and the identification of the application which is the subject of the appeal; ii. The name, address, and phone number of the appellant and his/her interest in the matter. iii. Appellant's statement describing standing to appeal (i.e., how he or she is affected by or interested in the decision); iv. The specific reasons why the appellant believes the decision to be wrong. The appellant shall bear the burden of proving the decision was wrong; v. The desired outcome or changes to the decision; and vi. A statement that the appellant has read the appeal and believes the contents to be true, signed by the appellant. Any notice of appeal not in full compliance with this Section shall not be considered. 58.) Shelly Ament of WDFW met with Hank Warren, representative and reviewed the proposed site development plan for the camp improvement projects. The Phase 1 and Phase 2 projects are located > 1/4 mile from the bald eagle nest tree. Only 6 small fruit trees will need to be removed for the projects associated with these phases. The WDFW grants approval for the proposed zoning and initiation of Phase 1 and 2 projects. Future building or septic permit applications from Kiwanis shall be sent to WDFW for review purposes. Any further proposed tree removal on the property shall be reviewed by WDFW. Any future development that may be proposed closer to the nest tree or within 250 feet of the lake shore shall require further evaluation on impacts to the eagle habitat. A Bald Eagle Management Plan will be required in the future for projects that may be proposed in these sensitive management zones. BLD08-00166 MLA08-00200 NORTHWEST KIWANIS CAMP I F Al Scalf Application Received: 4/23/2008 Permit Issued/Case closed: 9/19/2008 Case Finaled: 9/14/2009 BATHROOM - SHOWER BLDG AT NW KIWANIS CAMP THERE IS AN EXISTING 500 GALA/G TANK 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on (date)for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property:Type Ns Stream less than 20% grade, F&W Habitat, Class IV Wetland. 2.) A setback of 440 feet, measured perpendicularly from the wetland edge, shall be permanently maintained as a buffer. No filling, grading, clearing, or other alteration of the wetland or its buffer is allowed. 3.) The identified Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area (Type Ns Stream), shall maintain a vegetative buffer setback of 50feet. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM)to the Restroom Facility. 4.) An additional setback of five(5)feet is required from the edge of the buffer area to the proposed Restroom Facility. 5.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 6.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 7.) The site plan as submitted with the building application on april 23, 2008 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated September 19, 2008 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 8.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 9.) The parcel has been designated as Parks, Preserves & Recreational under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 10.) Prior to final occupancy the water system improvements approved by DOH must be completed and finaled by DOH. 11.) Any restroom facilities must be screened from view from surrounding properties and the entrance must be fully visible from the public areas. 12.) A Conditional Use Permit was issued August 14, 2006 for this development and expires August 14, 2011. 13.) Development shall comply with the conditions required under the Conditional Use Permit approved August 14, 2006 under MLA06-00045/ZON06-00006. 11 tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 3/19/2015 Page 11 of 14 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type BLD11-00225 MLA11-00180 NW KIWANIS CAMP I R David Wayne Johnson Application Received: 8/11/2011 Permit Issued/Case closed: 10/24/2011 Case Finaled: NEW BUNKHOUSE (1292 SF) 1.) See ZON06-00006 for conditional use approval and findings that apply to this project and property. 2.) A setback of 100-feet, measured perpendicularly from the Category II wetland edge approximately 150 ft southeast of Beausite Lake), shall be permanently maintained as a buffer. No filling, grading, clearing, or other alteration of the wetland or its buffer is allowed. A setback of 150-feet, measured perpendicularly from the Category I wetland edge(the wetland to the east and adjacent to Beausite Lake, shall be permanently maintained as a buffer. No filling, grading, clearing, or other alteration of the wetland or its buffer is allowed. A setback of 25-feet, measured perpendicularly from the Category IV wetland edge(southwest of Beausite Lake), shall be permanently maintained as a buffer. No filling, grading, clearing, or other alteration of the wetland or its buffer is allowed. 3.) A permanent physical separation along the upland boundary of the wetland buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation can include installing logs, trees, a hedgerow, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 4.) The identified Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area(Type 5 Streams), shall maintain a vegetative buffer setback of 50-feet. The setback shall be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark(OHWM)to the proposed development. 5.) An additional setback of five(5)feet is required from the edge of the buffer area to the proposed development. 6.) A permanent physical separation along the boundary of the buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such separation can include installing logs, trees, a hedgerow, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 7.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 8.) The applicant is proposing to create or add 1,716 square feet of impervious surface and 1,716 square feet of land disturbing activities. JCC 18.30.060 and 18.30.070 require your proposal comply with Minimum Requirement#2 (Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention)of the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 9.) The project shall comply with Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention(SWPP) Elements#1 through#12 of the Department of Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 10.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(iii). 11.) The site plan as submitted with the Building Permit application on August 11, 2011 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated October 20, 2011 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 12.) This approval is for a New Bunkhouse only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 3/19/2015 Page 12 of 14 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 13.) NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as"critical habitat"for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline,freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes,wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there - Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches The Federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act requires landowners within 660 feet (1/8th of a mile)of an eagle nest to consult with the US Fish and Wildlife Service. This Eagle Act prohibits anyone from "taking" bald eagles. This federal law defines the term "take"and describes the possible legal consequences when a "take"occurs. Among other actions, "take" includes a disturbance of bald eagles or their habitat. Under federal law a permit may still be required for activities that impact bald eagles or their habitat. Contact the US Fish and Wildlife Service (http://www.fws.gov/pacific/eagle/) to learn more about how this law affects your project. Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species "taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 14.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 15.) Building setback from Beausite Lake Road is not less 20 feet. Right side setback is 250 feet from the adjacent commercial forest land. Left side and rear setbacks are no less than 5 feet. 16.) Parking is existing and adequate to comply with JCC 18.30.100. ZON15-00005 MLA15-00013 STANDLEY P Anna Bausher Application Received: 3/5/2015 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: CAMP BEAUSITE ENLARGE EXISTING TRAIL FROM 4FT WIDTH GRAVEL TO 8FT WIDTH PAVED AND PAVED PARKING AREA SHORELINE EXEMPTION No findings, conditions, or permissions found. PRE05-00052 JEFFERSON COUNTY F Mo-chi Lindblad Application Received: 12/6/2005 Permit Issued/Case closed: 2/1/2006 Case Finaled: To construct dorm and restroom facilities for camp operations. No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP08-00075 NW KIWANIS F Application Received: 4/23/2008 Permit Issued/Case closed: 6/3/2008 Case Finaled: 9/8/2009 SEP99-19(whole system)valid &filed here.. This permit for transport line only from new restroom shower building. 1.) No water crossings are expected. If a water line is encountered the Jefferson County Health Department and designer must be contacted prior to crossing 2.) Issuance of this transport line to serve a new bath house was approved as the bath house was to serve the existing buildings and does not result in an increase of capacity or guests. 3.) As per Jefferson County Code 8.15 all onsite sewage systems require monitoring. Monitoring shall be provided by an approved entity. THIS SYSTEM IS REQUIRED TO BE INSPECTED PER JEFFERSON COUNTY CODE 8.15 AS ADOPTED OR AMENDED. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 3/19/2015 Page 13 of 14 Cases Name Review Status Planner Type 4.) Risers are required to grade with secured lids over both compartments and over the outlet of the septic tank for inspection and maintenance/monitoring. Minimum 20"riser over inlet. 5.) Any portion of transport line under a driven way is to be sleeved/cased or equivalent. 6.) Designer must be contacted prior to start of construction and for inspections during installation. DESIGNER IS REQUIRED TO DO A PRECOVER INSPECTION ON ALL TYPES OF SYSTEMS. 7.) Notification of the start of construction shall be faxed or emailed to Jefferson County Public Health ONE WORKING DAY prior to start. 8.) H -An asbuilt drawing and certification of completion by the designer is required prior to final approval. 9.) Divert all sources of drainage, including roof drains away from septic tank area. 10.) Low use water fixtures required, 1.6 gal.flush toilets and 2.5 gpm shower heads. 11.) Approval/issuance of a sewage disposal permit does not guarantee the approval of other development or a building permit on this site. Compliance with other Jefferson County and Washington State Codes is required. 12.) Approval of this sewage disposal permit does not preclude the permit holder from complying with the Unified Development Code for other/future development on the site. 13.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. SOM08-00075 JEFFERSON COUNTY RCR Application Received: 4/23/2008 Permit Issued/Case closed: 5/6/2014 Case Finaled: modification to original StP99-19 No findings, conditions, or permissions found. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Parcel_Cond.rpt 3/19/2015 Page 14 of 14 Parcel Details Page 1 of 2 Jefferson County Home County Info Departments Search Parcel Number: 901273004 SEARCH Parcel Number: 901273004 Printer Friendly Owner Mailing Address: JEFFERSON COUNTY PO BOX 1220 PORT TOWNSEND WA98368-0920 Site Address: 510 BEAUSITE LAKE RD CHIMACUM 98325 Section: 27 School District: Chimacum (49) Qtr Section: SW1/4 Fire Dist: Chimacum (1) Township: 29N Tax Status: COUNTY Range: 1W Tax Code: 0211 Planning area: South Chimacum/Inland Valleys/Center (6) Sewer: Drainage: Bank: View 1: View 2: Zoning 1: PPR - Parks, Preserves, and Recreation Zoning 2: Zoning 3: Sub Division: Assessor's Land Use Code: 1100 - Residential - Single Unit Property Description: S27 T29 R1W W1/2 SW SW(LY N'LY OF RD) W1/2 NW SW Tax, A/V, Sales, Photos, and Permit Data Blda Data Map Parcel Plats &Survev Septic Monitoring Into fifth Jefferson County HOME I COUNTY INFO i DEPARTMENTS I SEARCH Best viewed with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 or later (16 Windows - Mac http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parceldetail.asp?Parcel_NO=901273004 4/16/2015 LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES INC • Page 2 of 3 Policy no. GLA399263010 Received by L&I Effective date 05/29/2014 06101/2014 Expiration date 06/01/2015 Insurance history Savings No savings accounts during the previous 6 year period. Lawsuits against the bond or savings No lawsuits against the bond or savings accounts during the previous 6 year period. L&I Tax debts No L&I tax debts are recorded for this contractor license during the previous 6 year period,but some debts may be recorded by other agencies. License Violations No license violations during the previous 6 year period. Workers' comp Do you know if the business has employees?If so,verify the business is up-to-date on workers'comp premiums. L&I Account ID Self Insured. 700,227-00 This business is certified to cover its own workers'comp costs.No premiums due. Doing business as LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES INC Estimated workers reported N/A L&I account representative (360)902-4817 Workplace safety and health Check for any past safety and health violations found on jobsites this business was responsible for. Citation issue date 08/06/2014 No violations Inspection no. 317385458 Location Center Rd.-Lake Larson RD. Chimacum,WA 98325 Citation issue date 03/30/2011 Violations Inspection no. 314752288 Location 8705 Ne 117th Ave Vancouver,WA 98662-3247 Citation issue date 03/01/2011 Violations Inspection no. 314716952 Location 8705 Ne 117th Ave Vancouver,WA 98662-3247 Citation issue date 02/16/2011 No violations Inspection no. 314732793 https://secure.lni.wa.gov/verify/Detail.aspx?UBI=601106847&LIC=LAKESI*274JD&SAW= 3/5/2015 LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES INC • Page 3 of 3 Location • 2400 Sargent Blvd Aberdeen,WA 98520-4214 ©Washington State Dept.of Labor&Industries.Use of this site is subject to the laws of the state of Washington. https://secure.lni.wa.gov/verify/Detail.aspx?UBI=601106847&LIC=LAKESI*274JD&SAW= 3/5/2015 LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES INC • • Page 1 of 3 Home InicioenEspaiiol Contact Search L&I SEARCH A-Z Index Help My Secure L&I Safety Claims& Insurance Workplace Rights Trades& Licensing 0 Washington State Department of Labor & Industries LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES INC Owner or tradesperson PO BOX 7016 LEE,MICHAEL JAMES ISSAQUAH,WA 98027-7016 429-313-2600 Principals KING County LEE,MICHAEL JAMES,PRESIDENT WAGGONER,HENRY R,SECRETARY WOOLSTON,DAX EDWARD,TREASURER LEE,TIMOTHY GEORGE,CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER WHITE,JOHN C,AGENT DARNELL,LARRY,TREASURER (End:06/17/2008) LEE,JEANNE M,VICE PRESIDENT (End:06/22/2012) LEE,R R SR,PARTNER (End:11/27/2007) STUTGIS,ROBERT E, PARTNER (End:11/27/2007) Doing business as LAKESIDE INDUSTRIES INC WA UBI No. Business type 601 106 847 Corporation License Verify the contractors active registration/license/certification(depending on trade)and any past violations. Construction Contractor Active. Meets current requirements. License specialties GENERAL License no. LAKESI'274JD Effective—expiration 04/0411973—07/31/2016 Bond TRAVELERS CAS&SURETY CO $12,000.00 Bond account no. 105116927 I Received by L&I Effective date 06/17/2008 07/01/2008 Expiration date Until Canceled Insurance Zurich American Ins Co $1,000,000.00 https://secure.lni.wa.gov/verify/Detail.aspx?UBI=601106847&LIC=LAKESI*274JD&SAW= 3/5/2015 JEFFERSON COUNTY 0a3 No. 154175 / DATE 5/3/24015 RECEIVED FROM `+/III' 244 ' a 11/ .i ' DESCRIPTION BARS# AMOUNT V CURRENCY`7 //�J��r/�{ �� ) a �,/ COIN P 'Vltll co CHECKS/ r ?4t, &j G, cm) X30.2 s Sc 19. ° 2 S --1- 4. 91O paz ; Lam ,PL/ c (x/dp-iyi, mis i`ty---4, .1" Irtif RECEIVED BY � .L .L����� TOTAL qt/ A DEV4)PMENT REVIEW TIMESIEET CHARLES STANDLEY MLA15-00013 Date Time Comments /�/ / I O i ii'Q�9 a !ice t-_ Lti TCJC�s�p� `4 ,2-� %i.c.a ' gi A C O M ti-AJ — !-4'l 1" ., Cad # 5 M -t \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_Case_CRMLA.rp1 March 19,2015 C CONSISTENCY REVIEC 1 Project Planner: Master#MLA15-00013 Review Type Project Description QY11'�AUS ,7AN45rpOQBS CAMP BEAUSITE ENLARGE EXISTING TRAIL FROM 4FT SpP 15— j 0 cj WIDTH GRAVEL TO 8FT WIDTH PAVED AND PAVED PARKING AREA SHORELINE EXEMPTION Applicant: CHARLES STANDLEY Site Address: 52 S ORCHARD LN 510 BEAUSITE LAKE RD PORT ANGELES WA 98362 CHIMACUM WA, 98325 OWN JEFFERSON COUNTY PO BOX 1220 PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368-0920 Project Location: Parcel Number: 901273004 S-T-R: 27-29N-1W Total Acreage 28 Legal Description S27 T29 R1W W1/2 SW SW(LYN'LY OF RD)Wl/2 NW SW Land Use: 1100 Flood District: Fire District: 1 Planning Area: 6 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: •chool D 49 Zoning: 1z- rkCS COMP PLAN ` Pr-e,S-e✓ore S�1Z1� . DESIGNATION: `p? S Ty-e P�. prj-cS � ('ep`-�-�CYy\ COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: UGA Trans [ ] Plot plan states "property line" [ ] Assessor's Map(Property lin o submitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the Assessor's 1/4 map) [ ] Legal Access to Property YES NO [ ] Parcel Tags or Scanned ents YE`�0J €0.D\)v [ ] ESA's: Special Report -arby YES [ ] Designated Ag YES S [ ] Shoreline Designation YE NO A11 t di [ ] Shoreline Sloe- Stability: YES NO Stream T YP°4 NO i Ua — ieL E FWHCA: NO v v vr� Wetlands: NO 1 c_. . �. L �.r • Rare Plants: ES 1v0 1 Seismic: 0 N• Landslide: • S 0 Flood: YES Cn.�, Erosion: YES `> Aquifer Rec arge Area:YES i 3) SIPZ: tl.:r_> At Risk High Risk Coastal CMZ: o .>> High Risk Moderate RiskDisconnected CMZ Stormwater site plan submitted: YesNo [ ] Forest Lands: YES Ns Adjoining Forest Lan.s: Commercial/ d Rural/ Inholding_ [ ] Mineral Lands: YES .1 . [ ] Agricultural Lands: Y. [ ] Archaeology: YES �r [ ] No Shooting Zone: YES NO [ ] Stormwater: New Impervious Surface Land Disturbing Activity ESA's Stormwater Req's:Min Req#2 Min Req#1 thru#5 Min Req#1 thru#10 Engineering [ ] Notice Provisions/Discl s -: • • .ort YES Atil MRL YES AD Forest Lan YE NO NNW [ ] Landscaping Required: r,.. o [ ] Parking Spaces Requir:. NO Other f 1 Building Height: 35' .': Standard [ ] Impervious Surface coverage percentage: Resource Lands&Public: 10% Rural Residential: 25% Rural Industrial: Per UDC Sec 6.7 TCommercial: 60% Area of Building Coverage:60%in Rural Industrial Lands only [ ] Total Building(s) Size: RVC:20,000 SF CC:5,000 SF':7,500 SF GC: 10,000 SF All others:subj to se c&water constraints/None specified [ ] Setbacks: Front: ZQ t Left Side: 2O' Right Side:L Rear: 5' Shoreline Setback: 10 D / .}- lekViALAaris 1 10' LSHA Setback: [i t i I Road Classification: 1`r Road Approach: EXISTING NO Q'D RAP [ ] SEPA Required: YES EXEMPT w A 111 -1 - I I - '2 O d ( 3 [ ] Flood Certificate: (V/1-\ [ ] Existing Case(s)& rtion(s): krb- Violations: Yes (lo [ ] Recorded Date of Subdivision: tlA- AFN Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions: Nb� <5yrs=Plat Conditions on plat or Old Ordinance [ ] Lots/Require Declaration Restrictive Covenant YE.,,r, s • q tted: YES NO [ ] UGA No Protest Agreement 0, submitted: �'r 3 a [ ] Site Visit conducted YES • [ ] Require Final Zoning Approval • S C C) [ ] ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan case N/A YES New Parcel Tags entered in Permit Plan N/A YES Special Reports Scanned N/A YES No parcel tags found for parcel Associated CASES status issued finaled description 901273004 CAR99-00036 F 3/22/1999 3/22/1999 New alternative septic system. SEP99-00019 F 6/25/1999 6/7/2002 Now filed w/SEP08-75 a modification adding a new transport line. CAM14-00324 M 5/22/2014 Existing 4 foot gravel path replace with 8 foot asphalt to comply with ADA requirements CAM15-00073 M 2/12/2015 Is the wetland habitat management plan still valid for another project? Is the Conditional Use permit still valid? MLA08-002U0 BLD08-00166 F 9/19/2008 9/14/2009 BATHROOM-SHOWER BLDG AT NW KIWANIS CAMP THERE IS AN EXISTING 500 GALA/G TANK MLA11-00180 BLD11-00225 R 10/24/2011 NEW BUNKHOUSE(1292 SF) MLA15-00013 ZON15-00005 P CAMP BEAUSITE ENLARGE EXISTING TRAIL FROM 4FT WIDTH GRAVEL TO 8FT WIDTH PAVED AND PAVED PARKING AREA SHORELINE EXEMPTION PRE05-00052 F 2/1/2006 To construct dorm and restroom facilities for camp operations. SEP08-00075 F 6/3/2008 9/8/2009 SEP99-19(whole system)valid&filed here.. This permit for transport line only from new restroom shower building. SOM08-00075 RCR 5/6/2014 modification to original SEP99-19