HomeMy WebLinkAbout091415_cabs02County Administrator Briefing
JEFFERSON COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA REQUEST
TO: Board of County Commissioners
Philip Morley, County Administrator
FROM: Carl Smith, DCD Director
Donna Frostholm, Associate Planner and Wetland Specialist
DATE: September 14, 2015
SUBJECT: Contract for professional services to support the GMA requirement to
update critical area regulations to apply to agricultural lands
ATTACHMENT: Contract for professional services with Environmental Science
Associates (ESA)
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
As part of the Growth Management Act (GMA) required update of the comprehensive plan, the
County must update its critical areas ordinance (CAO) as it applies to new agricultural uses. Due to
Department of Community Development (DCD) staffing constraints and in order to do this in a
manner that is timely, credible, and meets the best available science (BAS) requirements of the
GMA, professional scientific help is needed. The DCD staff has followed the County's contracting
procedures to select a qualified consultant; Environmental Science Associates (ESA). A proposed
contract for ESA's services is attached.
ANALYSIS:
The primary GMA statute regarding protection of critical areas is as follows:
"RCW 36.70A.172 — In designating and protecting critical areas under this chapter, counties
shall include the best available science in developing policies and development regulations to
protect the functions and values of critical areas, in addition, counties and cities shall give
special consideration to conservation or protection measures to preserve or enhance
anadromous fisheries."
Criteria on meeting this statute are identified in numerous WAC's (365 -190 & -195). These criteria
are scientifically based and in order to meet them, the updated CAO must be supported by scientific
evidence. As Jefferson County does not have sufficient staffing to ensure compliance with these
extensive requirements, the help of a qualified consultant is required so that the updated CAO will
have the credibility to meet legal challenges before the Growth Management Hearings Board or civil
law suits.
The proposed consultant study will focus primarily on fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas,
wetlands, and frequently flooded areas as these are the critical areas most associated with existing
and on -going agriculture along the Chimacum Creek and other streams (such as Snow Creek and
Big Quilcene River). The report would include data, analysis and recommendations on topics such
as:
County Administrator Briefing
• Existing watershed level characterizations for eastern Jefferson County, and stream - specific
conditions for Chimacum Creek and other streams, especially where agriculture is taking place.
• Existing biological and physical data along Chimacum and other creeks to use as a baseline of
habitat conditions for monitoring future habitat conditions, and documenting habitat improvement or
decline.
• Identify state or federal special habitats and species of local importance, including threatened and
endangered species.
• Special consideration of anadromous species; their habitat needs and existing conditions.
• Terrestrial species conditions and considerations.
• Best available science literature review and inclusion of BAS relevant to local conditions.
• Based on data and analysis, critical area management options and recommendations will be
proposed.
The updated CAO will have regulations such as stream and wetland buffers that will be scrutinized by
various interests. A scientifically credible CAO is the best way to defend the regulations if legal
challenges arise. Additionally, as implementation of the CAO could affect listed species under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA), it's important that its provisions are not likely to contribute to "take"
under the ESA.
In order to select the recommended consultant, DCD staff followed the County contracting
procedures for "professional services' using the roster of consultants at the Municipal Research and
Services Center (MRSC) website. DCD received one responsive proposal, from ESA. ESA has
done numerous similar studies and is well qualified to perform these services.
FISCAL IMPACT
The contract amount is for $99,945. This amount has been identified for allocation from the general
fund.
RECOMMENDATION:
This agenda request is for DCD to brief the Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) on Monday,
September 14, 2015. After the September 14, 2015 briefing, DCD is intending to prepare another
agenda request for the following Monday (September 21, 2015), in which DCD will recommend that
the BoCC to approve the attached contract for professional services with ESA to in support of the
GMA comprehensive plan update.
REVIEWED BY:
Philip Morley, County Administrator Date
County Administrator Briefing
ATTACHMENT A
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
WITH ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATES
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the County of Jefferson, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "the County", and Environmental Science Associates (ESA), hereinafter
referred to as "the Consultant", in consideration of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions
hereinafter specified.
L Pro'ect Descr
Consultant is retained by the County to prepare supporting
documents for a "Critical Area Ordinance {CAC) Update" in a timely manner, in support
of the County's broader update of its comprehensive plan.
2. Sc ied on Exhibit "A"
Lqpe pf Servieg—S. Consultant agrees to perform the services, identified
attached hereto, including the provision of all labor. The scope of services identified in
Exhibit "A" is a part of the full proposal submitted by Consultant, as included as Exhibit
&6c5l.
Tim: Perfo!MoLnce. Work under this contract shall commence upon the giving of
written notice by the County to the Consultant to proceed. Consultant receipt of a
Purchase order shall constitute said notice. Consultant shall perforin all services and
provide all work product required pursuant to this agreement on the dates listed on
Exhibit "A"
4. p� The Consultant shall be paid by the County for completed work and for
services rendered under this agreement as follows:
a. Payment for the work provided by Consultant shall be made as provided on
Exhibit "B" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to
Consultant shall not exceed $99,945.00 without express written modification of
the agreement signed by the County.
b. The $99,945.00 budgeted as compensation for the Consultant is not subject to
alteration, therefore any cost overruns incurred by the Consultant to complete the
grant tasks and deliverables (Exhibit A) shall be home solely by the Consultant.
C. The consultant may submit invoices to the County once per month during the
progress of the work for partial payment for project completed to date, up to 80%
of total project costs. Such vouchers will be checked by the County, and upon
approval thereof, payment will be made to the Consultant in the amount approved,
d. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the total contract price earned
will be made promptly upon its ascertainment and verification by the County after
the completion of the work under this agreement and its acceptance by the
County.
CONSUt,TANT AGREEMENT
Savica A cnkfil ESA CAA updmd 1,2045-DA EDUSA rtv. 7J /20 14
Payment as provided in this section shall be full compensation for work
performed, services rendered and for all materials, supplies, equipment and
incidentals necessary to complete the work,
The Consultant's records and accounts pertaining to this agreement are to be kept
available for inspection by representatives of the County and the state for a period
of three (3) years after final payments. Copies shall be made available upon
request.
5. Ownershin and U ' se of Documents, All docurnents, drawings, specifications and other
materials produced by the Consultant in connection with the services rendered under this
agreement shall be the property of the County whether the project for which they are
made is executed or not. The Consultant shall be permitted to retain copies, including
reproducible copies, of drawings and specifications for information, reference and use in
connection with Consultant's endeavors. Consultant understands and acknowledges that
any records, documents, correspondence or other materials prepared, received or
generated by it, no matter their native format, may be a "public record" as that term is
defined in RC'" 42.56.010(3) and thus subject to production to a requester pursuant to
Ch. 42.56 RC W.
6 QomDliance with laws. Consultant shall, in performing the services contemplated by this
agreement, faithfully observe and comply with all federal, state, and local laws,
ordinances and regulations, applicable to the services to be rendered under this
agreement.
Indemnification. Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the County, its
officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all claims, losses or liability, or
any portion thereof, including attorneys fees and costs, arising from injury or death to
persons, including injuries, sickness, disease or death to Consultant's own employees, or
damage to property occasioned by a negligent act, omission or failure of the Consultant.
Insurance.
The Consultant shall obtain and keep in force during the terms of the Agreement, policies
of insurance as follows:
If and only if the Consultant employs any person(s) in the status of employee or
employees separate from or in addition to any equity owners, sole proprietor, partners,
owners or shareholders of the Consultant, Worker's Compensation Insurance in an
amount or amounts that are not less than the required statutory minimum(s) as established
by the State of Washington or the state or province where the Consultant is located.
Commercial Automobile Liability Insuranc.e providing bodily injury and property
damage liability coverage for all owned and non-owned vehicles assigned to or used in
the performance of the work for a combined single limit of not less than $500,000, each
occurrence with the COUNTY named as an additional insured in connection with the
CONSULTANT AGREMMENT
Smw A A9,0enicnM E$A CAD updaw N-M-154M EDrrS doe rev, 911 M14 Page 2 of
CONSULTANT's performance of the contract.
generaj Commercial Liabilit insurance in an amount not less than a single limit of one
million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and a aggregate of not less than two (2) times
the occurrence amount ($2,000,000.00 minimum) for bodily injury, including death and
property damage, unless a greater amount is specified in the contract specifications. The
insurance coverage shall contain no limitations on the scope of the protection provided
and include the following minimum coverage:
a. Broad Form Property Damage, with no employee exclusion;
b. Personal Injury Liability, including extended bodily injury;
C. Broad Form Contractual/Commercial Liability — including completed operations;
d, Premises — Operations Liability (M&C);
e, Independent Contractors and Subconsultants
f. Blanket Contractual Liability.
Such insurance coverage shall be evidenced by one of the following methods:
* Certificate of Insurance;
* Self-insurance through an irrevocable Letter of Credit from a qualified financial
institution.
Certificates of coverage as required by this section shalt be delivered to the County
within fifteen 0 5) days of execution of this agreement.
Any deductibles or self-insured retention shall be declared to and approved by the County
prior to the approval of the contract by the County. At the option of the County, the
insurer shall reduce or eliminate deductibles or self-insured retention or the Consultant
shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim
administration and defense expenses.
Failure of the Consultant to take out and/or maintain any required insurance shall not
relieve'rhe Consultant from any liability under the Agreement, nor shall the insurance
requirements be construed to conflict with or otherwise limit the obligations concerning
indemnification,
It is agreed by the parties that insurers shall have no right of recovery or subrogation
against the County (including its employees and other agents and agencies), it being the
intention of the parties that the insurance policies so affected shall protect both parties
and be primary coverage for any and all losses covered by the above described insurance.
It is further agreed by the parties that insurance companies issuing the policy or policies
shall have no recourse against the County (including its employees and other agents and
agencies) for payment of any premiums or for assessments under any fonn of policy. It
is further agreed by the parties that any and all deductibles in the above described
insurance policies shall be assumed by and be at the sole risk of the Consultant.
It is agreed by the parties that judgments for which the County may be liable, in excess of
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT
CAOupdakeS.'O-t5-DA EDITS,d. mv 9A/2014 P-p' 3 of I t
insured amounts provided herein, or any portion thereof, may be withheld from payment
due, or to become due, to the Consultant until such time as the Consultant shall furnish
additional security covering such judgment as may be determined by the County,
The County reserves the right to request additional insurance on an individual basis for
extra hazardous contracts and specific service agreements.
Any coverage for third party liability claims provided to the County by a "Risk Pool"
created pursuant to Ch. 48.62 RCW shall be non-contributory with respect to any policy
of insurance the Consultant must provide in order to comply with this Agreement.
If the proof of insurance or certificate indicating the County is an "additional insured" to
a policy obtained by the Consultant refers to an endorsement (by number or name) but
does not provide the full text of that endorsement, then it shall be the obligation of the
Consultant to obtain the full text of that endorsement and forward that full text to the
County.
The County may, upon the Consultant's failure to comply with all provisions of this
contract relating to insurance, withhold payment or compensation that would otherwise
be due to the Consultant.
9. In"de endent Contractor. The Consultant and the County agree that the Consultant is an
independent contractor with respect to the services provided pursuant to this agreement.
Nothing in this agreement shall be considered to create the relationship of employer and
employee between the parties hereto, Neither Consultant nor any employee of
Consultant shall be entitled to any benefits accorded County employees by virtue of the
services provided under this agreement. The County shall not be responsible for
withholding or otherwise deducting federal income tax or social security or r f
,o
contributing to the state industrial insurance program, otherwise assuming the duties of
an employer with respect to Consultant, or any employee of Consultant.
10. Covenant 'Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that the firm has not
employed or retained any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working
solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that the firm has not paid
or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely
for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other
consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract.
For breach or violation of this warranty, the County shall have the right to annul this
contract without liability or, in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or
consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage,
brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.
11. Discrimination Prohibited. The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it
under this agreement, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, national origin,
religion, creed, age, sex or the presence of any physical or sensory handicap in the
selection and retention of employees or procurement of materials or supplies,
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT
C..rAUwrs)dbi mM pg)atie,Lwkr�?,licfOsQft�Wi'AOwsK'kniporsry InI&MOt Fi WCOntelm 0u11wk 8L1RGQPY%PTDfmQws1 Sc- '6m Ag-k ESA CAO pd.� 9-34 I i5-DA Eb ITS k T� - 9A12014 Page 4 of t I
12. As erne —nt- The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the services covered by this
agreement without the express written consent of the County.
13. I�gjj-Waiyer. Waiver by the County of any provision of this agreement or any time
limitation provided for in this agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other
provision.
14. Le—rml—nat'M
a. The County reserves the right to terminate this agreement at any time by giving
ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant.
b. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any
of its supervisory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the
Consultant hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this agreement,
if requested to do so by the County. This section shall not be a bar to
renegotiations of this agreement between surviving members of the Consultant
and the County, if the County so chooses.
15. 1io–C, c—e—s -
Notices to the County of Jefferson shall be sent to the following address:
Jefferson County Department of Community Development
621 Sheridan Street
Port'rownsend, Washington 98368
Notices to Consultant shall be sent to the following address:
ESA
5309 Shilshole Avenue NW
Suite 200
Seattle, Washington 98107
16. Lntegrated-Ag- eemqnt, This Agreement together with attachments or addenda, represents
the entire and integrated agreement between the County and the Consultant and
supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements written or oral. This
agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both County and
Consultant.
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT
'Mc"WI Servias AgmcmfflrJSACA0wpda7cfl,2M5-DA BNTSdw rev. 9W2014 P38C 5 of 1 I
MR#=
SIGNATURE PAGE
Name of Consultant
SIGNATURE PAGE
day of
Consultant's Representative (Please print)
(Signature)
Title
Date
NM
JEFFERSON COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
David Sullivan, Chair
Phil Johnson, Member
Kathleen Kier, Member
Approved as to form only:
David Alvarez
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
Carl Smith
DCD Director
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT
Date
Date
C ldl)se.i,i-4onmr',AppDDITild,,� -Ud tierma WiltdmYkl'CIMPOIMn' I wumm l i ["',CoiuLcnl. Oudwk%L[EMPYd'TotmiomI s-5 Ag--.g E1,A CAO uptne 9-2C, E 5-DA FDITS.dn ray 9e I "M u4 Pw 6 of I
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of service is based on Section 2 of the proposal dated 8-13-15 and delivered to the
County by ESA on that same date. The scope of services and assumptions are presented below..
Scope of Services:
Task 1: Best Available Science Review and Report
Jefferson County performed a review of best available science in 2004 as part of its
Comprehensive Plan update. The County commissioned the development of scientific
information for its wildlife habitat and channel migration zones as part of the update and has
since a complete shoreline characterization as part of its Shoreline Master Program (SMP)
update. ESA will review and synthesize this information with additional published scientific
information from state agencies on best practices for protecting critical areas, with a particular
regard to agricultural areas. We will prepare a BAS bibliography and synthesis report that
leverages all of the existing information with a focus on wetlands and fish and wildlife habitat
conservation areas.
Along with a detailed review of the current best available science, the report will include a
summary of the key scientific findings since 2004 that may not be represented in the current
CA0. This summary will inform development of the recommendations report (Task 3) and
provide a reader - friendly description of the applicable science to citizens, decision makers, and
other stakeholders.
Task 2: Watershed Characterization Report
ESA will compile existing biological and physical data relating to critical areas within eastern
Jefferson County, with a focus on stream conditions in agricultural areas. This will make use of
data and inventories already completed, such as water quality data collected by the Jefferson
County Public Health and the Jefferson County Conservation District, as well as Washington
Department of Fish and Wildlife species and habitat data.
To present and organize the data in the characterization report, ESA will delineate separate
watershed analysis units based upon watershed boundaries and land use patterns. For example,
the Chimacum Creek watershed would be one separate analysis unit, and the Ludlow Creek
watershed would be another. Early in the characterization process, ESA will prepare draft
watershed analysis unit maps to the County for review. For each analysis unit, ESA will
document existing habitat conditions and functions, aquatic and terrestrial species use, water
quality, and other relevant habitat and critical areas data. Based upon a review of the data and
conversations with County staff and local experts, we will describe watershed - specific
management recommendations and restoration/mitigation opportunities. These descriptions will
be accompanied by maps showing the relevant critical areas data for each analysis unit. To
accompany the report, the collected data for each watershed analysis unit will be summarized
into a 1. -page, reader-friendly watershed "fact sheet," The fact sheets will be targeted to citizens
and landowners, to help them easily understand the environmental conditions, issues, and
opportunities in each of the County's watersheds.
CONSULTANT AGREEMEN'.1'
"tt"VI F ksQmw 0U11 zkWAfQPWTD[_' i-al Sc-us Agmalmm E$A C. AO pdmc &-A B5• A EDMAm mw. W 1 /20 p 4 papc 7 of tl I
Task 3: Recommendations Report
Using the synthesis of BAS under Task I and the results of the watershed characterization
conducted in Task 2, the ESA team will identify the policies, regulations, and programs that need
adjustment to better protect and manage critical areas in Jefferson County. The report will be
grounded in Washington State laws and regulations for critical areas and land use and structured
to provide a set of options for revising the DL regulations, with an emphasis on agricultural
areas. For each set of options, we will also provide a subset of recommendations based on our
experience with GMA, the CAC update process, and Jefferson County.
To accompany the report, ESA will prepare a written summary detailing recommended CAO
changes. For other CAO updates, ESA has developed a consistency matrix that lists the specific
elements of the code, whether they are consistent with BAS, options for change if needed, and
literature references. This type of at-a-glance summary serves as a helpful tool for County staff,
citizens, Planning Commission, and the Board of Commissioners to easily follow the logic for
recommended revisions.
Task 4: Public Participation
ESA will provide technical support and presentations at key junctures up to the amount specified
in the attached budget proposal. If staff limitations require greater consultant support, f' SA can
also assist in more involved discussions with the Planning Commission and Board of County
Commissioners. ESA's support for Jefferson County Planning Commission public hearings and
presentations to the Board of County Commissioners at any step in the process could include
meeting facilitation, and development of maps, PowerPoint presentations, and other relevant
presentation materials.
General Assumptions*
The following assumptions apply to completing all tasks and providing all deliverables listed in
the scope of services above:
The Consultant project manager will provide updates to the County via email or
conference call as needed (generally every two weeks) throughout the project period.
• The County will lead all administration, communication and coordination to manage
meetings and handle meeting logistics, fees, etc. for the duration of the project.
• All draft deliverables will be provided in electronic format. Electronic documents will be
delivered in both PDF and M' Word format, Final documents will be delivered free of
"draft" watermarks or other draft markings, with one hardeopy provided along with
electronic format.
* ESA will provide draft materials to the County one week prior to scheduled meetings.
* A single(]) review cycle is assumed for all deliverables /interim work reviewed by the
County and associated parties; the County will be responsible for consolidating all
comments for each deliverable into a single document for transmittal to the Consultant.
The timeframe for a review cycle (from transmittal of the document(s) for review to the
County to receipt of consolidated County comments) is assumed to be two weeks.
CONS ULTANT' AGREEMENT
q7 Word Filcls4CntLviq!1 t,q ook�SLIgGq Y' Pod..i ... W 9/U2014 pa lom
Unless otherwise noted, the Consultant will participate in required meetings via phone
conference as a first option and efforts will be made to consolidate meetings throughout
the project to save travel expenses.
• The project does not include involvement of a citizen's advisory committee or a technical
advisory committee. Coordination or facilitation of such a committee is not included in
this Scope Of Work.
• The County will be responsible for receiving and responding to public comments over the
course of the project and during the legislative process.
• Review of the recommended revisions to the ordinance under the State Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA) is not included in this scope of services.
Adoption of a revised ordinance is the responsibility of the County and not the
Consultant.
Assumptions for Specific Scope Activities
The following assumptions apply to completing specific activities listed in the scope of services
above-
The best available science report will be limited to three specific critical areas, fish and
wildlife habitat conservation areas, frequently flooded areas, and wetlands. Critical
aquifer recharge areas and geologically hazardous areas will not be addressed.
• "rhe watershed characterization will be completed using existing and available
information and data on hydrologic conditions, soils, land cover, impervious surfaces,
parcel information, water quality data, and habitat and species data. No new data will be
collected as part of the project. The, County will provide and/or assist in identification of
preferred base data (GIS files) and information.
• Information for the entire County will be assembled and summarized as part of the
watershed characterization, but it is assumed that reader-friendly watershed "fact sheets"
will be prepared only for watersheds in eastern Jefferson County and not all watersheds
in the County.
• The recommendations report will be limited to regulations for three specific critical areas-,
fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, frequently flooded areas, and wetlands. The
report will address the other critical areas only in the context of how policy and
regulations can better protect all critical areas using a watershed-based approach.
Recommendations will be focused on critical area regulations (JCC 18.22) and will not
include stormwater, clearing and grading, zoning, or other land use regulations.
• A maximum of 54 consultant hours are allocated for supporting public participation and
meetings with County elected officials. This assumes presentation at two (2) public
meetings of the Planning Commission and one (1) at a public meeting of the Board of
Commissioners,
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT
I nlmo Scni= Agr"mult LqA �CAO upawe 14•. (W,DA FDUT,� dm rev. 9/W20N Vage 9 of 1 I
1*141103ye
PAYMENT TO CONSULTANT
The Consultant will provide the County with an invoice for its services rendered by the loth of
each month, The Consultant shall be paid within 60 days of the county's receipt of the monthly
invoice. The Consultant will also provide with each invoice a summary of the costs incurred, the
name and job title of the person(s) performing the work-, the work performed to date of invoicing
by task number.
CONS (JIJAN"I" AGREEMENT
C dm Mv. 91112014 PAV I Od I V
rww_ +'�
CONSULTANT PROPOSAL
CONSULTANT AGREEMEN"I"
11,19nM Swim Ag—ont H A CAO updm 8-20-15-DA EMSAm mv 91P2014 VAp 01 of 1 11
JUFFEIRSU' COU10Y
Jefferson County Department of Community Development
Critical Areas Ordnance ate
P
53osShuftmole Avenue mw
Suite 200
Seattile.vA 95107
2063M9658/ '' ^`
August 13, 20I5
Carl Smith
Jefferson County Department oF Community Development
G2I Sheridan Street
Port Townsend, VVA 98368
Subject: Critical Areas Ordinance Update Project
Dear Carl:
As you undoubtedly know first-ham, regulating critical areas within agricultural anascanbemnecfthmnmmst
challenging and contentious issues ofirriplementing the requirements of the Growth Management Act (GMA).Tohelp
update Jeff erson County's Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO) while accommodating agricu Itural uses, the Cou nty needs a
team with a sound understanding of the science, substantial expertise in GMA critical areas comptiance,and thorough
awareness mE the county's landscape and land use issues, Environmental Science Associates (ESA) has the combination
of skills and experience .0 efficiently complete all project e|ementsandinnproveoutcomeanfcritice|ereas
management.
ESA's proposed team of scientists and policy experts are well-respected for helping local governments tackle difficult
land use and environmental challenges through thoughtful, disciplined, and objective means. Our team has a wealth of
critical areas, resource management, and public involvement expertise to dedicate to this effort. ESA's scientists and
planners have assisted numerous cities and counties with their CAO update processes, and have developed many "Best
Available Science" reports and CAO update recommendation reports. For example, we are currently working with Island
[mwnty and the[itlesnfPnrtOrchardmndFedera| Way ontbeir[AOupdateu,andhave comp |etedupdateminKent,
Duvall, Sammamish, Tukwila, Gig Harbor, and Burien, as well as for Whatcom and Pierce counties. ESA is also a
recognized leader in shoreline master planning and has assisted a large number of jurisdictions, including Jefferson
County, with updates tm Shoreline Master Programs (6Mps).
VVe have proposed |tun Logan as our project manager for this work. lion is a scientist who has been engaged in critical
area and watershed planning work around Puget Sound for 14 years, As a project manager, lion excels at delivering
quality products on-time and within budget. She knows the science and the legal frarnework that drive critical areas
regulations, and sees her job as facilitating Jefferson County's development of its own unique approach to meet GMA
critical areas requirements,
The attached proposal provides more information about our experience and approach. Our compact format describes
our strategy in terms of team qualifications, project understanding, directly relevant experience, and budget
breakdown, which addresses approach and outcomes for the four tasks in your RFP. We would be thrilled to work with
youonLhisimportanteffortmndiookfonwardtuyourreuiewwofmurprmpmsaLP|emoecomtactmeat
mc|omcy@Pesamsuc.cmrnnrcaiimneut2Q6.788.96SQ with any questions. Asan officer of the firm, | have the authority to
sign an ESA contract.
Sincerely,
ESA
Margaret Clancy, PW5
vice President
Director, Northwest Region
Firm's Areas ot Expertise
Since the early 1990s, ESA has been engaged in CAO
updates and has a wealth of experience crafting policies
and regulations that address community needs,
reflect best available science (BAS), and meet Growth
Management Act (GMA) requirements, We have helped
Whatcom, Kittitas, and Pierce Counties and numerous
cities evaluate and update their critical area ordinances.
Currently, we are working with the cities of Edmonds,
Port Orchard, Lynnwood, Federal Way, Duvall,
Renton, and Kent to update wetland, stream, habitat,
floodplain, critical aquifer recharge area, and geohazard
regulations. our role on these projects ranges from
comprehensive policy and regulatory updates to minor
amendments to select portions of the code, We know
that no two jurisdictions are the same; each has its own
unique natural resources, stakeholder, roups, political
climate, and land use issues and opportunities, We have
worked with a wide range of County and City staff to
develop approaches to the update process that meet
their needs, and we are able to adapt our strategy as the
update process moves along.
ESA has substantial experience working in Jefferson
County, both for the County and other clients. We
supported the development and adoption of the
County's Shoreline Master Program (SMP), which
included completing a comprehensive inventory
and analysis of nearshore and freshwater shorelines
throughout the County. For the Hood Canal
Coordinating Council (HCCC), ESA helped identify
priority freshwater and nearshore sites for their In-Lieu
Fee (ILF) mitigation and Integrated Watershed Plan
projects, which included sites within Jefferson County,
As part of this project we worked directly with Jefferson
County staff to evaluate the County's wetland and
stream mitigation policies and procedures to identify
potential deficiencies and also incorporate the HCCC
ILF program into County code. Currently, ESA is working
with the County on a project to implement the SMP,
with a focus on achieving "no net loss" of ecological
functions as required by the shoreline Management Act,
Because of this past and ongoing experience, we fully
understand that agriculture is vital to the economy and
culture of Jefferson County and realize that developing
new and/or different environmental regulations in
agricultural areas can be contentious. Complicating
this issue is the fact that agricultural uses often occur
AugUSI 1 3. '21015
• Experienced team with over 50 CAO/SMP updates
completed within the past decade.
• Team members with Jefferson County experience.
• Project manager with current CAC) u pd ate
experience.
• Excellent relationships with Ecology and Tribal staff.
• Familiar with BAS scientific literature.
The City of Tacoma was challenged before the Growth Management
Hearings Board for the adequacy of its critical marine fish and wildlife
habitats. ESA reviewed Tacoma's adopted Critical Areas Preservation
ordinance, prepared a BAS review of critical habitats, and summarized
protection rneasures. The revised ordinance was adopted and the
challenge was resolved.
in and near floodplains, wetlands, and riparian habitats,
which are designated critical areas. This is the case in the
Chimacum valley and in the Snow/Salmon valley and in
other parts of Jefferson County. As with our other CAO
projects, we will use our sound understanding of the
science, good relationships with Tribes and regulatory
agencies, and public involvement expertise to develop
workable solutions to accommodate agricultural uses
while meeting the requirements of the GMA.
We selected staff for this project based upon expertise
and availability and we confirm that proposed staff are
sufficiently available to complete this project within
your schedule. Although some of the ESA staff working
in Jefferson County such as Aaron Booy (ESA's project
manager for the County's "no net loss" project) are not
included as pant of the project tear; (because they are
busy fulfilling their other commitment to the County), all
ESA staff are available to provide advice for this project
on an "as-needed" basis. In this way, we can put all of our
Jefferson County knowledge and experience to work on
this project.
iejjer;�ror°[ (o Critical Aaeas Ov6nance, Uj-,)date
Roie� Uon wifl tjjeBAtearn forme
GAO update and wW�id devellop�7ienK
WmeF3A.S review a�yjmporl arxd fhe,
reoommenUafiomamport
Role: AdarnwiH support lion wilt) daily tasks
and Iload development of he waterghed
characterizaticN) report
Role: As profe,0 dir(_-)ctmMargimlwWassis�
with uhahogy,po�yUavelopmeril,and
quality ss&_jranomkx all prodL.k;ts on tie
CAO update.
| Ion isasenkorecoloeistfami;iar with both freshwater and marine
neenshmre systems who enjoys projects that tackle natural resource issues
at a landscape scale, require spatial analyses, and deliver products useful
tn decision makers. She has 14 years of experience asamenvironmental
consultant in the Pacific Northwest and brings an interdisciplinary approach
to complex environmental and natural resource issues. ;|on has authored a
full range of scientific and regulatory compliance documents including BAS
reviews for city and county governments. She is currently assisting the cities
of Kent, Federal Way, and Renton with their [AO Update processes.
Adam has over I2 Years of experience io natural resource management inthe
Pacific Northwest, with a focus mn watershed-based land use p|enniog.He
manages and supports a diverse set of interdisciplinary projects involving
environmental permitting and compliance, aquatic habitat and watershed
restoration, and community land use planning, Adam has reviewed and
performed Mund red sof wetland and stneam assessments and has comp(eted
several watershed plans. He is currently servicing as Project Manager for Port
Orchard's CAOupdate.
Margaret will support /lon with all aspects mf the project, induding
pmvi6ingstnatea�direction and enoudngquality assurance and qualbv
contnoiShe �mrecogn�ed expert incrNjcmla�a ordinance deve(npnn^
and has vworkedonavvidm array mf environmental and land use
—'-^
management issues around Puget Sound. Margaret managed Jefferson
County^sSMP update as well as ESA's work on the C|ailamCounty's sNP
Update and the flood Canal Coordinating Council's ILF project. VVith
�
�aaret's(nvo[vememtinthepnoject'Jeffersmn[oumtyvv||benefithom
the lessons learned on these previous efforts and other eco logica I ly-foc used
planning projects across Washington State.
!and
Christina Hersum
re
!dgt
ma BAS Review
Associate Biologist
a
fieldwork , species identification ' a
CC
wood CAO Update
Natural resource protection policy
collectto n
. N Forage Fish Surveys
f I t I
regulatory processes.
Scott Olmsted
- Specialized experience in welland
- Island COuntY CAO Update
Senior Ecologist
sciences, mitigation planning, &
, Hood Canal Coordinating Council ILF
Natural resource protection policy
. permitting.
Solid understanding of local, state,
Program Support
- Rick Tollefson Trail
analysis & development
national, and tribal environmental law &
_ - -
- permitting practices.
JonmyKemp
_-
° Experience with analyzing visual data,
_ -- -
, Edmonds '- -
^ —'~ Update
G�Ano/et
an�� and G�
" -----'�
~ Mapping GiSanak��
support.
~ MokNenWatershed-based -~~~
" Remote .
P�m
~ Development of dynamic maps&
Approach to the Project
ESA has crafted a straightforward approach to complete
all the tasks described by Jefferson County in the RFR
We feet that this approach will successfully guide the
County to protect agriculture lands while improving
management of wetlands and streams, with the
ultimate goal of meeti ng, the requirements of the CIA.
We want to emphasize that close coordination with
County staff is a central theme in our approach. Our
experience has taught us that updating existing
regulations requires not only knowledge of best
available science, but also a solid understanding of how
the code is being implemented and enforced at the staff
level.
The following describes our proposed scope of services
for each task,
1, 1%
R p
Jefferson County performed a review of best available
science in 2004 as part of its comprehensive Plan
update. The County commissioned the development
of scientific information for its wildlife habitat and
channel migration zones as part of the update and has
since a complete shoreline characterization as part of
its Shoreline master Program (SIVIP) update. ESA will
review and synthesize this information with additional
published scientific information from state agencies
on best practices for protecting critical areas, with a
particular regard to agricultural areas. We will prepare a
BAS bibliography and synthesis report that leverages all
of the existing information with a focus on wetlands and
fish and wildlife, habitat conservation areas.
Along with a detailed review of the current best
available science, the report will include a summary
of the key scientific findings since 2004 that may not
be represented in the current CAO. This summary will
inform development of the recommendations report
(Task 3) and provide a reader-friendly description of
the applicable science to citizens, decision makers, and
other stakeholders.
Ilon Logan, Senior Ecologist and our Project Manager,
will lead development of the BAS review and report.
Avgusl 13,
kf�H 5AjMMAAV
DungeneSS River Reach i
�HQRE.LIIHL UNGIw
For the Cla [lam County SM P update, ESA created one-page " "reach
sheets" that described,, in pWn ianguage, the relevant ecological
conditions, habitat functions, and management opportunities for
each shoreUne reach.
2� Wnb,,,,,ishe,,,i
ESA will compile existing biological and physical data
relating to critical areas within eastern Jefferson
County, with a focus on stream conditions in
agricultural areas. This data will make use of data and
inventories already completed, such as water quality
data collected by the Jefferson County Public Health
and the Jefferson County Conservation District, as well
as Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife species
and habitat data. In areas where habitat data is lacking
or insufficient, ESA scientists will conduct targeted
fieldwork to assess habitat conditions.
jefle,rson County Crihca� Areas Ordinance Updalr
BaawN an -,w.
nn
For the Cla [lam County SM P update, ESA created one-page " "reach
sheets" that described,, in pWn ianguage, the relevant ecological
conditions, habitat functions, and management opportunities for
each shoreUne reach.
2� Wnb,,,,,ishe,,,i
ESA will compile existing biological and physical data
relating to critical areas within eastern Jefferson
County, with a focus on stream conditions in
agricultural areas. This data will make use of data and
inventories already completed, such as water quality
data collected by the Jefferson County Public Health
and the Jefferson County Conservation District, as well
as Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife species
and habitat data. In areas where habitat data is lacking
or insufficient, ESA scientists will conduct targeted
fieldwork to assess habitat conditions.
jefle,rson County Crihca� Areas Ordinance Updalr
Seclion 2: Apprc)ac h to the. Project
To present and organize the data in the characterization
report, ESA will delineate separate watershed analysis
units based upon watershed boundaries and land
use patterns. For example, the C h i rn acu m Creek
watershed would be one separate analysis unit, and
the Ludlow Creek watershed would be another. Early
in the characterization process, ESA will prepare draft
watershed analysis unit maps to the County for review.
For each analysis unit, ESA will document existing
habitat conditions and functions, aquatic and terrestrial
species use, water quality, and other relevant habitat
and critical areas data. used upon a review of the data
and conversations with County staff and local experts,
we will describe watershed-specific management
recommendations and restoration/mitigation
opportunities. These descriptions will be accompanied
by maps showi ng the relevant critical areas data for
each analysis unit. To accompany the report, the
collected data for each watershed analysis unit will be
summarized into a 1-page, reader-friendly watershed
"fact sheet." The fact sheets will be targeted to citizens
and landowners, to help them easily understand the
environmental conditions, issues, and opportunities in
each of the County's watersheds.
Adam Merrill, Watershed Scientist and our Deputy
Project Manager, will lead development of the
watershed characterization report,
3, Repor-t
Using the synthesis of BAS under Task 2 and the results
of the watershed characterization conducted in Task
3, the ESA team will identify the policies, regulations,
and programs that need adjustment to better protect
and manage critical areas in Jefferson County. The
report will be grouncledin Washington State laws
and regulations for critical areas and land use and
structured to provide a set of options for revising the
CAO regulations, with an emphasis on agricultural
areas. For each set of options, we will also provide a
subset of recommendations based on our experie nce
with GMA, the CAO update process, and Jefferson
County.
Atter a fine-try-line review of the City of Renton s current CAO,
ESA sum m a ri zed a I i5t of recommendations for code revisions in
a simple and straightforward matrix for City planning staff, The
recommendations were packaged 41 five categories. 1) inconsistent
Witt) BAS; 2) gap / imissing protection; 3) intern al consistency, 4)
cWfty/ user friencil iness; arid, 5) updates to reflect current City
procedures,
To accompany the report, ESA will prepare a written
summary detailing recommended CAO changes. For
other CAO updates, ESA has developed a consistency
matrix th at lists the specific elements of the code,
whether they are consistent with BAS, options for
change if needed, and literature references. This type
of at-a-glance s u m mary se rves as a helpful tool for
County staff, citizens, Planning Commission, and the
Board of Commissioners to easily follow the logic for
recommended revisions.
Non Logan will lead development of the
recommendations report.
T, tis�k A. i''U[Aic
Led by lion Logan and Adam Merrill, ESA will provide
technical support and presentations at key junctures.
If staff limitations require greater consultant support,
ESA can also assist in more involved discussions
with the Planning Commission and Board of
County Commissioners. ESA's support for Jefferson
County Planning Commission public hearings and
presentations to the Board of County Commissioners
at any step in the process could include meeting
facilitation, and development of maps, PowerPoint
presentations, and other relevant presentation
materials. ESA has provided similar support to cities
and counties around Puget Sound and we pride
ourselves on our ability to clearly communicate critical
area-related issues to decision-makers.
Qeclion2: Appmaoh/o:hePnojecl
�ropms��� ^ �e So (J�u|e
adra��cheduke6orcorn�bdn�oro�c tasks, based
The�Qupe�e(mwanmmm project _ ,
upon the deadlines stated im your RFF! Before we are under contract, ESA
will work with County staff tu establish am updated project schedule and
path toachieving the overall Jume2Gl6 project deadline.
Throughout the project \imnLogan,murpropooedpr#jectmnunager,v«il|
actively manage our team to ensure work progress for each task is on track
for on-time delivery. All time and materials are tracked weekly through our
nment�o��una m1lmwimgforrap[d and real-time updates on
project management ,
time and effort oma weekly basis.
I(omwiKreguimrlyupd ate the [ounty project roammgernfschedu le, both
through phone calls and monthly progress reports.
raskr BAS Review RePOrt
ofaft Repol
mna� RePO'
�
r"^^z. Watershed ohaf0c�wizm.*~nelport
Draft An*wsu=M Bps (D
mattn"pp*
�
p"w n��
r~°^n Report
orafl Report
—
pm"/x=w^
Tas'K^pubI*PaIUC�P8=°
�
,°'w°Irmocom= p.w^v"qa*^"
~,
2nd plInningCOMM p*se"*wOn
Je#ersnnComray Critical Areas OiidinanceUpdate
Similar Past Projects
Jurisdiction
Jefferson County
Wand County
Whatcorn, County
✓
✓
Clark County
✓
Pierce County
Mason County
Kittitas County
✓
I/
Pend Orielle
County
City of Lynnwood
I/
City of Edmonds
City of Port
✓
Orchard
Ci ty of Gig H a rbor
V
City of Kent
V
City of Federal
Way
City of Mill Creek
City of Issaquah
City of Miukilteo
V
V
City of Puyallup
V/
I/
City of Renton
✓
✓
CityofSunnner
✓/
%/
City of Tacoma
I/ ✓
City of Tu kwila
✓
V
City of
V,
Woodinville
ESA has deem serving Puget Sound clients Out of our Ballol-d office since
1987. Otffcl'itical oreos protection pond COMPrehensive Monning experience
stretches fron? the eody19,90s to thePrese',nt, A
Re evonce bullets, number, of scoff involved, card references for these
ore listed in the toble found in Section 4 of this proposal. We invite you to
con tact 't he re fei onces listed in Section 4 of this pl000s 0'/ to verify our teolns
Perfoi-monce on similarprojects.
ly
• Jefferson County's SIVIP Update - In addition to completing a
comprehensive inventory and analysis of nearshore and freshwater
shorelines, ESA provided a consistency review and regulatory
integration strategy as precursors to developing shoreline goals,
policies, and regulations, Working with Policy and Technical Advisory
Committees and County staff, ESA developed recommendations
for updating the SMP and assessing the cumulative effects of
implementation. We also prepared a restoration plan, in cooperation
with the Battelle Marine Sciences Laboratory and Ecology, which
identified and prioritized restoration opportunities throughout
the County, ESA helped the County present the Draft SMP and
associated work products to the public through a series of cha rrettes
and other workshops and supported the local adoption process by
participating in meetings with the planning commission and Board of
County Commissioners. The locally adopted SMP includes a unique
designation system adapted to the specific shoreline conditions in
Jefferson County and customized polices and regulations for important
issues such as aquaculture. (since commercial shellfish harvest is one of
the key economic sectors in the County), moorage, and nonconforming
uses,
Jefferson county No Net Loss - ESA is currently assisting Jefferson
County with implementation of their updated SMP, focused around an
EPA grant funded framework intended to maximize SMP success and
achieving no net loss of ecological functions. Ongoing efforts include
completing an updated reach-by-reach inventory and characterization
of existing natural and built environmental conditions, which includes
review of critical areas conditions along the County's numerous miles of
marine and freshwater shorelines, as well as assessing initial shoreline
development permit decisions since the SMP became effective in early
2014. Assessment of permit decisions is requiring detailed review and
understanding of integrated critical areas regulations; and for many
shoreline development sites ESA is completing site visits to assess
how permit actions are affecting conditions on the ground. These
efforts, coordinated closely with Planning Department staff, provide
us familiarity with critical areas conditions and management decision
implications across the Jefferson County landscape,
|s\amdL�oun�y i
° BAS Review -ESA reviewed scientific literature and prepared reports
addressingmadneandfxeshwaterhmbhato|n2O0Tand2008.The repo rts
summarized the state of science and presented literature pertaining
to buffers, mitigation standards, and best management practices. The
BAS review focused on water quality degradation from septic systems,
shoreline and streambank alteration, and loss mf connectivity between
meanshm/e, upland habitats, and freshwater streams.
°
island County SNIP - ESA assisted with public outreach; mshoreline
inventory and characterization report; u pciates to designations, policies,
and regulations; development ofa restoration plan; and local adoption.
VVm also led public outreach meetings and developed new policies. ESA
reviewed existing FVVHCA regulations and BAS for shoreline habitat areas
and drafted updates; changes incorporated in the locally adopted SMp
received Ecology approval in2Dl3.
°Island County CAQ Update - ESA has assembled a team ofbiologists,
hydrologists, water rights specialists, hydrugeo|ogYstm^and gemiogiots,
tomtiHzmam/atenshed-based approach tm inform rev[ewvof the Countya
comprehensive Plan and CA8 and Mo identify connections between
land use planning policies and practices and watershed processes
and functions. The County expects to focus onwwet|andprotections,
agricultunai,activitiem exemption changes, groundwater protection,
and landslide hazard areas, The project includes a review ofBAS,
documentation of existing conditions, and a needs assessment and
gap analysis report that identifies options for policy and regulatory
changes. The ESA team will also support the County with revisions to
the Comprehensive Plan, critical areas regulations, and the legislative
process uptoadop¢iom.
�i�ty{�A��do�e
Fu�ed through an Ecology 5MA grant, ESA assisted Kittitas County and
three mfits cities � with comprehensive updates to their SMPs; ESA balso
assisting the County with updating its CA0` This work includes preparation of
a comprehensive shoreline inventory and characterization report; shoreline
jurisdiction maps; and a /eviewmfBASforwetLmmds ' fish and wildlife habitats,
critical agu|fernacharge aneau'fnqmenLlyMomded areas, amd geuLogicaiiy
hazardous areas. The upd�edSMPo were locally adopted im2OI4. Work mm the CA0|ymdU occurr i 1o� date, ESA deweinpedad raft updatedCA0that
n�� u
includes regulations specific to agricultural activities in the Naches watershed
(vvhichis not enrolled im the state Voluntary Stewardship Progmm).Other
key agriculture-related work included developing a definition and regulatory
strategy for "hobby tarms."
�\liea�f Rentun Fe��nn\ V�»y Kan� � �dn'm�dm
��� Qpdates
ESA is assisting these four cities with updates to their CAOsasrequired
under the GMA for use of BAS and special consideration for sa[mmn|ds.ESA
isevewing each CA consistency reviewing
for revising the regulations, an dsupportingthepubQccormrounicetionduring
the legislative process. For Renton and Kent, ESA is also supporting achieving
compliance with the National Marine Fisheries Service Biological Opinion
(BiOp)of the Fed era iEmergencyManagemeot Age ncy^s (FE MA) Nadona(
Flood insurance Program (NF|P).
Section 3- Silmilar Past Pro�ects
JeMemmn(,owmf Uticn�Areos Ordinance Update
Augl4t 13. 2015
The HCCCnLFisanintedoca| agency and non-profit sponsored program for
completing mitigation projects mccordimgtothe|atex federal mqu(nements
The H[C[ILF Program is unique in that � proposes tm provide cumpemuabo'
for stream and nearsho/e habitats (maJdidmntofrexhm/a1erwedands ESA ''
docunnentedthe need for the Pnogramnand its potential benmMtm(nth'
Program Prospectus that wvaoapproved hy federal agencies in2OIl --
also helped prepare the instrument w/h/chia the legal documemt governing
operation of the program. Other tasks >nduded: identification ofpr|—�—
framhvvaterand nearahoe roster sites; mitigation site assessment a-~^�xiQn
forboth6eshwwoterandnearmhonenicea;appendiogtheyLFinstrum'~~^ith
roster site documentation that amppu�sthe generation ofcredits; technical
support supportfor reviem/ing,updabng^and 7nmp|emendmgcounty m/dgoti--'''^
programs; supporting county efforts tmcod|fx the H[C[(LFPnogemand
frontline mapping
uw�M ���t�roh��F ��mm�in� � ^���
ESA is helping the City of Duvall complete a watershed-based |aodoue
planning project to support the Comprehensive Piao'chbca< areas, and
stmrnow/ater/L|Dupdates.Theprojectimimtegmadngwuotenohedasuesamen1
approaches developed by Ecology with locally available subbau�m data. ESA
|s developing strategies for managing critical areas with an emphasis u
on
maintaining watershed functions, Ve have comp(etedadraft watershed
p[
mn
with recommendation for updates to the City sensitive area ordinance, their
land use code, clearing and grading standards and stormwater standards,
We have also compl t d �non-prnjectact/mn��PAcheckHm1(orthemam ` uh|chisbe(ngcons|dered0mradop1ionthismomth.
(""Js &�r��c���r���
ESA is assisting Nukilteo with two watershed-based appmachprojects.
For the G/S8tomnwater Project, ESA im using BStm develop astonnmmter
management plan. For the Critical Areas Mitigation p 'ec ESA
potential mibgadonsi�simth�emobbaminm6ohowi ' ' ~
m�aw/mtershed'based
approach; assessing hydrologic, soil, and biological conditions on the sites;
developing conceptual plans for the prioritized sites; and developing mbuffer
hee-in-[ieu program for several sites,
Vw fS ��P/CAO Upd,,, cs
The Vhatozm County SMPis the first countywide SMPtobe adopted locally
sincetheohoneOneguideUneswenempdated|n2003.VhbneaHvl5Qmiha
of marine and 300 miles of freshwater shoreline, the County was in the
forefront of integrating ecosystem.. wide concepts, Public involvement, and
policy and regulatory development. Known asAda|Eson Associates Inc, at the
dme(p/[ortomerg/ogw[thESA)'ourstaffwenarespunoibloform ventoryao d
analysis ofeculogica(and built environment conditions, andass--- mbh
development of shoreline Policies, environmental designations, regulations,
and e restoration plan, and coordinated with chti ca / a easpo|iciesand
regulations, Concurrently, we assisted with an update of the county's critical
areas regulations. We developed a literature review and recommendations
for designations, protection, buffers, mitigation and other Performance
standards tm document BAS im compliance with GMArequirements,
Referencel
wl-)atcom County - Puget Sound county project
SMp,iCAO tjpdates - BAS review airnd
report Shoretirie/watershed
chaiacterizaGon Agd(UftUral
lands management
August 13. 205
3 Project manager, 5 biologists, Whatcom County (PM has left the county)
4 Planners, I hydrologist, '2 GlS 311 Grand Ave, Befliingharn, WA 913225
analysts 360-676.6700
Jefferson County O'dticaf Areas Cl durance Ulpd;iIte
,
SMIP 'Update
Donna Frostholm, NNL Project Manager, Jefferson
J eff erson County
SmP Update
County
Project Experience
Jefferson County project
I project manager, 3 biologists, 3
621 Shendan St. Port fownsmid,WA983GS
• smpupdate
Watershed/shnreknC'
planners„ and 2 GIS analysts
3 60 379.4466
No Net t-055Project
characteirizatuOn
No Net Loss Project
Land use rcgulations
- A project manager, 2 biologists, A
No Net toss. Project
planner, and I GIS analyst
Jefferson County project
WatersheNshoreline
characterizatuon
'Hab tat a5,,essrnent
BAS Review I
BAS Revicw
Brad Johnson, Senior Planner, Island County
1,,lancj county
Experience
-Puget Sound (county project
1 project manager, 3 biologrst5, 1
ist NE Lath Street, PO Box 500, CoupeviHe, WA 98239
36H78,7972 b,johnqon@co.is1Iand.wa.us
BAS Review
- BAS review and report
planner, I hydrologist, and I GIS
SNIP Update
SMP Update
anajyst
CAO Update
Puget Sound county project
SIAP Update
• Watershed/shoreline
I project manager,3biotogists,3
C�,raraCtehzation
planners, and 2 GiS analysts
CAO Update
CAO Update
Puget Sound courity project
1 project manager, 4 brolopists,
Agricultural lands management
3 planners, I water rights
• CAO gap analysis
51pec i a I i s t, I hyd rogeo Vogi st, and
2 geologists
K itti tas Co u n ty C AO/
- CAO project
2 project managers, 5 biolog�sts,
Dor, Hansen, Planning Manager, Kittitas County
smP Updates
. •BAS review and report
3 planners, 2 hydrologists, 1
411 IN. Ruby St,, Suite 2, Eflensburg, WA 98926
'
- Shoreline/watershed
geologist, and 2 GI S analysts
509-9162,7694 rioc,han en�@�co,knttilas.v'a,us
chafacterizatw
. Agr�iculitiuralliandq,rnanagernent
Cities of Federal Way,
- CAO projects
i ic tro ns
For each project. 1. f.,uroject
marnager, 2 biologists, 2 pllwincrs,
Matt Herrera, City of FederA Way
33325 8th Ave- South, Federal Way, WA 98003
Kent, & Renton CAO
• p u get Sound j u r scl
- SAS review
I peologist, and I GIS analyst
253.835,2638 * rnatt,herrera@cityoff e�(lera�way.corTi
Updates
Todd Hunsclorfeir, Orry of Kent
220 Fourth Ave- South, Kent,, WA 98032
251856 5537 * thun5dorfcr@KentWA.gov
Angie Mathias, City of Renton
1055 S Grady Way, Renton, WA 9805"?
425.430-6576 ' amathias@rentonwa,gov
w <CC ILF Mitigation
• Flood Can,all project
I project marrager, 3 biologists, I
Patty IMichak , Mitigation Planning Manager, HCCC
138370
Study areas within Jefferson
planner, I h yd ro I opst, a in d 2 G I S
17 791 Fjord Dr. NE, Ste- 122, Poulsbo, WA
County
anallysV,
360{ 930-8634 * pnnichak@hccc.vva,gov
Habitat assewnent
Clkyof Duvall
Watershed characterization
1 project manager, 2 biologists, 2
Lara Thomas, Planning, Manager, City of Duvall
Planning
- Land use reguIlatior's
planners, 1 hydroIlogi5t, and I GIIS 15535 Main St. NE, Duvall, WA96019
'
Watershed
analyst
425,78&2779 ext 2 Iara.tlhornWq)duval1Iwa-gov
Project
11 teo Gl S
. Watershed cnaracte6zation
I project manager, 4 biologists,
(�leinPickki�,,SerkiorPlann(�ir,("ity�)fMuki[t(,�o
stormwater Project
sspwnent
- Habitat a�
(t, 1
2 planners, I hydrDlogis
net
11930 Cyrus Way, Mulkilteo, WA98275
I a rid a rc h i tect, 3 G1 S
425�2618041 gp
& Critical Areas
anaIiysts
�a ti o n Pro gra M
fjjq
wl-)atcom County - Puget Sound county project
SMp,iCAO tjpdates - BAS review airnd
report Shoretirie/watershed
chaiacterizaGon Agd(UftUral
lands management
August 13. 205
3 Project manager, 5 biologists, Whatcom County (PM has left the county)
4 Planners, I hydrologist, '2 GlS 311 Grand Ave, Befliingharn, WA 913225
analysts 360-676.6700
Jefferson County O'dticaf Areas Cl durance Ulpd;iIte
The ESA team is organized to provide cost-effective
services so that we maximize the value of the available
funds. Our budget allows for 875 hours of staff time,
Mora Logan, as the ESA Project Manager, will carefully
track the team's time and effort to provide fiscal
accountability and ensure the County receives the
greatest value for the associated cost.
Our cost proposal is based on the task descriptions in
your request for proposals, our understanding of the
proposed work, and previous experience with similar
projects.
Hourly Rate:
. ....... . ....
'cask
$195
� $145
. ... ..
� $225
$110
$210
T,otals...._
L Best Available Science
FZeyiew and Re tort
... .... . ....
6
40
. ......... . . m......._
55
40
75
12
236
F $27,075
Task 2- Watershed
- ----- . . . ....
Characterization Re
. ... . . .......
4
60
110
50
95
12
411
$47,220
Task 3: Recommendations
Report
8
20
40
35
20
12
6
141
$17,000
Task 4: Public Participation
2
116
20
6
4
6
..... . . . . ........ . . . . .. .... .... . —. . ..... . .....
8
62
$7,650
. ..... ___ Subtotal Hours
. .
20
-
136
... . � . . . ........ . ... .
..... . . ......
.... . . .. .... 225
131
... . . . .. .... ...
194
.... . . . .
. . . ....
110
34
850
98,94�
Subtotal Rei ursa esl
.....
. . ......
...... ..... .
AUc,j LISI 13, 2015 Jefff,,,o,son Couinty GritjcaC Are,,.is Ordirwi5cf?,, Ur)date
EDUCATION
M,Wk, N436nc &
sn,imnmentw�AffVcS,
umveirs|ty Ofwahn9tan1
u,A,sngl4h^uowensity
o|wmfmngton
��if�catc of wetland
science arid
aaoag(�mum'umi,ersity
ofwasmmgtoo
zs YEARS sxPMENCE
CERT|m[nT8NS
cerm��pr�Qfeo�O`n|
we�nd Scientist {PmS�
uy the SmdetYm
wetliand Sr|eutists.
N 1605
lion Logan, PWS
Senio����[�'�l� [�/���\[��l�r��
r �_����|����1C�L
lion isa senior ecologist with a focus om science-based policy, watershed
'planning, weiand and wildlife science, and project management. She has fifteen
years of experience as an environmental consultant in the Pacific Northwest and
brings am interdisciplinary approach tm complex environmental and natural
resource issues. lion is versed in restoration planning and policies for degraded
freshwater and marine nearshore systems. She is a prolific technical writer and
has authored a full range mf scientific and regulatory compliance documents
including best available science reviews for city and county governments and
NEPA/SEPA compliance documents. Asa registered Professional Wetland
Scientist, lion is proficient in all aspects of wetland assessment, delineation, and
regulation at the local, state, and federal levels. She has successfully assisted
clients with obtaining Corps Section 404 permits, Ecology 401 water quality
certifications, and development permits from local agencies, She is also well
qualified in wildlife stud,ies involving habitat survey and assessment, bird survey,
threatened and endangered species, and impact evaluation. lion isaskilled
project manager who has consistently provides high quality products arid
responsive service tm her clients.
AudubooSoci&Y
Relevant Experience
Cert�f/o.d Wetlano m
City of Federal Way CAO Update, Federal Way, WA. Project,Marcger lion is
WiWik,sPeda;istNevce
leading an update uf the City's CAO (Federal Way Revised Code Title l9;Division
County
x) regulations as required under the G. MA for use of BAS and special consideration
for salmonids, The City is looking to improve its management and protection of
streams, particularly those that are used bysalrmonids. ESA will provide aupdate
to the City's stream inventory, review the CAO regulations for consistency with the
recent science furnetla rids, streams, mndtheir buffers, provide mcommueodat|ons
forrev�sing the code, aodessistwitbpubUc outreach during the code opdate
process. lion will also assist the City in exploring the feasibility of implementing a
mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program.
City of Kent CAO Update, Kent, WA. Project Monoger, The City of Kent has
contracted ESA to provide technical support to update the City's CAO (Kent City
Code Chapter I1,05 ) regulations as required under the Growth Management Act
for use of BAS and special consideration for sa|mon(ds. ESA will review portions
of the CAO for consistency with BAS, provide recommendations for revising the
regulations, and support the City's public communication during the legislative
process. ESA wilt also support the City im achieving compliance with the National
Marine Fisheries Service Biological Opinion (B|Qp) of the Federal Emergency
Management Agency's (FEMA) National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). As part
of the CAO update, ESA will provide subcontractor expertise to assist with the,
review uf flood hazard area regulations.
City of Renton CAO Update, WA, Project Maria �e�Uoni�iead|mQamupd�eof
the City's [AQ (Renton Municipal Code Chapter 4-3-05O ) regulations, arequired
under the GIVIA for use of, BAS and special consideration for salmonids. The City
last updated it's CAOin2004 and several new scientific studies egandimg
wetlands, buffers, and wetland mitigation have been released since that time
|iomreviewedRenton^sCAQregmiatiunofbrcmnaistemcywiththerecantsden-
--
for wetlands, streams, and their buffers and provided recommendations for
revising the code, She facilitated a half-day workshop to help City staff better
understand wetlands in Renton, federal and state regulations, and the various
implications of the recommendations, lion has provided a set afcodenew�sioms
and will provide technical support to City staff during the legislative process of
the [AOupdate.
City of Shoreline, Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Update, WA. project
Scientist, lion was the primary biologist for, the City of Shoreline's comprehensive
update mf its SMP. She assisted with the revision of the City's inventory and
characterization report ensuring compliance with the 20W3 Ecology Guide|inem
Kuncharacterized the physical and biological nearshuneeowirommen�and
'
assessed existing shoreline ecological functions. An analysis of existing and
proposed land uses, shoreline functions, and opportunity areas for restoration
was also developed, lion coordinated with Ecology and City staff to address
Ecology comments,
Island County SAS Review for Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas,
WA. Senior Scientist Island County contracted ESA to provide scientific expertise
in support of updates to the County's CAO (Island County Code Chapter 17.02), as
required under the Growth Management Act (GMA). lion prepared a
comprehensive technical paper that summarized the BAS for protecting and
managing development in the marine mea/mhore. Because Island County in
located adjacent tm some of the most productive salmon-producing rivers (o
western Washington - the Snohomish, Stiflaguamish, and Skagit - the County's
major contribution to salmon productivity is its neoohore habitat, lion
researched and presented the state of the science specific to existing resources in
Island County and analyzed the protections provided by County regulations and
policies. The review focused on key issues for Island County, which include water
quality degradation frorn septic systems, shoreline alteration, and a loss of
connectivity between nearshore and upland habitats and freshwater streams,
City mf Gig Harbor Wmtand Inventory and BAS Review, WA. Project Scentbt.
ESA assisted with review cf the City's CAO(Gig 1--ladbnr Municipal Code Chapter
Dl06) aa required under the Growth Management Act (GMA) for use uf BAS and
special consideration for sa|monids. lion authored a technical memorandum that
summarized the state mf science for wetlands, streams and buffer regu/renments
The project included nev)em,and ev|siomto the city code bn�uugefor consistency
m/|1hbeataua||abiescience'ESAwesymboequemt|ycon1recte- to -onducta '-��
wetland survey of existing wetlands within the Urban Growth Area, lion assisted
with a detailed paper inventory using existing resources and verified potential
wetlandareac through mreconnaissance-!ewe( field sumey.
E�C�mm
a��'�ma�n�e��
���w��
w���ma
��v��mS��sx\EwC�
�EnT��*TOm/
�E��Sr�����
qovia���ma��v��
w��w�mV�mww)
C*mhc�mn
�U
�� =������ �/����U�^
������� U � ������U U UU�
�\����' ��, F��r���/�f K��d��U����
� ��`���\�LV �iL4wL/� |VK��` 'w|���"
Adamhasover��ekeye�csofexpehenceinnatom6resou�emana�ementinthe
padMcNor�rwest ��ha��usonmdemo�bnxe�iamdusepiaomin@�He�a�
maoaoedamdsup�u�edad�veoe��of|nterd�adpUnaryprmjec� invokhn0
env�rommentaiperm�tt|n��ndcumpUance'aquotichab�tatandvva�er�hed
�estorat�om'and�ommuo�t�ianduoep|amnin�� Hehasper�ormedhumdredsof
vvetian��deOnea6ansandaxsesamentoandbassucce�sfuUyassis1edc|ien\svv��h
mb¢a�m�n�Corps8ect[on404permits^�cu�m��40lm/aterqoaWtyce��0c�t�ono.amd
deweiupmentpermo|t�[romioca|a8encies.Hehmxaixoamthoredcridc�\arems
re�uiabons`3hmreQne�asterp�m�ramre�mi�dnns^and0EPA/�EPAcom�|iance
docurnents. Admm ishi�hiyexperiemcedvvor�in8c|n«e�yanddireci�ywvithdients'
sta��romnre�o[�torya0endes^and�hepubUconcompiexprc�ec1s.
*my`/n�pnsm� ��tym��m��mch�r��4���dm�m VN�.Pr�ec �ono�erAdamio��din�en
q��en r»�we�nV upd�emftheU�/s�/��ca|�eusOndinance([AO)(Po�Qrchand�un|dpaiCmde
wp an�nr�im8s��m Tit|e18)re�u�¢|mmsase�o�re�under1heGro��h�ama8ememtA�ferusec�
(nev/se�)c��m��/oes "�eo�eva||ablesdence^an�apmcia\oonsidera�ionfmrsaiman�dm. Tm�ate`A�amo
�mx�av��wedpo�D/char�^s[AOre�uiatiuno6orcmnulxtencywviththe�ecent
sc�enceforwetYands'stne�ms.crit�caiaqu�herrecha��areax,amdfrequemt|y
Nmm�edaneasandprovidedrecummemdadonsforrewis\n�thecmdm�AdamuvNi
aiso�rov\de1hecoderav�sioms�ndaoyimtOcystm�dorimQtheieQ|siat1veprucess
oftbeCA8update.
K�t���mu���C��/S��U�da�e�,��.Depu�y�r�ec �omo�ecFum�ed
�hrouo�mn�co��'��A8ran�ESAiscument�a��chm��bbtasCommtyamdthee
ofbsc���pe�ormcomprehen�weupdatesoftha�r5�Ps� E3A|am\mmaooimdnQ
the[ountyup�mheitsCAOTbisvvor�imc|ude�prepmrabonmfacormprehems�ve
shore��me�nventoryamdcharm�erizo��nnrepo����oreUmejurisdicdonmaps:�n�
arov�evvo�BestAxa[imbie6uience/orv*etian�s^f�shandvvi�dUfehabita�n,cr�tica|
��uipe/rechar�euweas,�e�uendyMuudedarea�,and�eo|oQica|iyha�arduuo
areas�Tbeu�datedCADand��psareunt�cipatedtobea�optedbyZW14.Adum
hasroanagedthedeve|o�mentmfsevera(S�P-re|�teddocamemt�'�ndmd\n���e
shoreUneinventuryamdc�uracterizadoorepo�^���cumuiat�veimpa�tana�ysis^
andshorellnees�oratimopiam.�e�\sodeve\opedtbeS��re�u\a�iono�orcridcai
�*�m�L��n������O�pd���,%�\ Pn?�c �c�nbstTheC�yofLymn�uodhos
contmc�dESA�oprov�detecholca\suppo�tompd��the8ty's[r�tice�Are�s
0rdimance(�A��(Lynn�uod�un�cipa|[udeChap�erl7.1{A��oia1)ons�s
require�umdertheGm�th�mmagementAc��oruseaf°bes1eval�abie�c�eoce°
amdspeciaicons1derehonhors�|mon[��.Amp�rtoftheCA8upd�te,�dmm
mmvievvedLynnvvood'sCAOre�oi��iomoforconxio�emcyw{th1herecen�sc�encefor
�e|(ands'streams`andthe�r�uRe�sandprovidedrecommemdadmnxfnrrev�n�nQ
thecude-
Puget Sound Watershed characterization User Outreach and Support. Task
Lead. ESA provided outreach and user, feedback assistance bm the Puget Sound
Partnership and Department of Ecology to support development of the Puget
Sound Watershed Characterization Project, For this project, Adam had a lead role
in an analysis of Puget Sound jurisdictions to identify opportunities, needs and
challenges, and key partners for using and incorporating watershed
characterization into local land use planning activities,
Birch Say Watershed Characterization Pilot Study, Whetcom, County, WA,
Watershed Scientist. The Birch Bay watershed study applied watershed
characterization tools developed 6y Ecology and habitat assessment mode(x
developed by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife to identify priority
areas for restoration, protection and development, The project used remote
sensing techniques tu assess and map wetland and riparian conditions
throughout the watershed. A key component was the development ufseveral
build-out scenarios that examined expected changes in impervious surface due to
proposed zoning and planned growth. The primary outcorne of the project was a
set nf detailed recommendations for preserving and restoring water flow and
water quality processes and maintaining high quality habitats that exist within
the watershed. Adam provided technical support in characterizing wetland and
riparian habitats through the watershed, using remote sensing techniques and
field reconnaissance.
Birch say Watershed Action Plan, Whatcomm County, WA. Task Lead, In2V0T^
ESA and a collaborative group o/ local, state, and federal agencies applied
watershed characterization concepts tm develop the Birch Bay Watershed
Characterization and Watershed Planning Pilot Study. ESA is provided assistance
to Whatcom County to develop the "Birch Bay Watershed Action Plan;,' a suite of
tools used to implement the watershed planning and land use recornme r1dations
detailed in the pilot study, For this project, Adam was the primary author of a
watershed-wide wetland and stneanm buffer midQation pia nanda Low /mpact
Deve|opmemt hand book, custom ized for t lie emvirmnrmenta| con didon»oythe
watershed, He also provided technical support for the development of public
education materials and the selection of future aquatic habitat restoration sites.
Shoreline inventory Process for Park Planning
at Deception Pass State Park,
WA. Project Scientist Adam Provided technical support for on inventory and
assessment mf the physical processes, biological features, and land use
alterations of the coastal shoreline at Deception Pass State Park, The results of
this project will be used to aid planning efforts within the park. Adam's duties
included impervious surface identification and analysis, GIS analysis, report
composition, and presenting the results atan academic conference.
Birch Bay Berm and Pedestrian Trail Design, WhatcomCounty, WA. Task L,,�od.
ESA is assisting Whatcom County with a soft shore berm and pedestrian trail
project along Birch Bay. The overall goals nf the project are to reduce storni/Oood
dam age, i m prove peclestria n safety, enhance shore access, im prove stormwater
drainage, and protect water quality while improving natural coastalgeologic arid
ecminciml process . Ada mis coordinating the environmental reportimgand
permitting for the project, in support of a NEPA approval, Corps Sections 10 and
404 review, Ecology Section 401, water quality permit, WDFW Hydraulic Project
Approval, and VVhatcom County critical areas review,
EoeCAXIgN
e��^po���un*eo�
23 YEARS EXPER:ENCE
cERTFCAT0mS
we d a ind s(, i�einceon d
of VV�,Ishmgtm
Certified PmfO.s vrI3I
wetiandS6entist(Pw'�)
bn the Soc^etyof
Wetiar)d Scientists
Margaret CI 'PWS
��K7�|��r`f F-�'r��/�f,��
�-``��t�L�L LJU�/L/iL�,
Margaret isa Professional VVeiemdSciencist with 23 years ofconsulting
experience \n the Pacific Northwest. She specializes [n projects involving
permitting and environmental assessment, shoreline master planning, Growth
Management Act (GM/Q compliance, watershed characterization, restoration
planning and design, and mitigation planning and implementation. Margaret
enjoys multidisciplinary projects that blend science, planning, policy
development, and public outreach. She has helped numerous local jurisdictions
update and implement critical area ordinances (CAOs) and shoreline master
programs (SMPs) and is working on several initiatives related to mitigation
effectiveness, watershed characterization, and the integration of resource
management and land use planning. Margaret has also managed environmental
studies for a variety of road, rail, and bridge improvements, utilities, parks, and
private developments and has helped clients comply with environmental
regulations through all phases of the project life cycle. She assists clients in
finding effective solutions to regulatory compliance challenges by streamlining
the environmental review and permit processes. She is adept mtobtaining Section
404 permits, water quality certifications, Hydraulic Project Approvals (H PAs),
shoreline permits, and Endangered Species Act (ESA), section Tconcurrence.
Relevant Experience
Jefferson County SNP Update, WA, Project Monager. Margaret served as the
Project Manager for the Jefferson County SMP Update. This work included
preparing a detailed the inventory and analysis of shoreline processes, functions
and development patterns; developing m database and map folio rodepict
shoreline conditions using geographic information systems (GIS); developing a
countywide restoration plan; and crafting policies and regulations for managing
several hundred miles of marine, river and lake shorelines. Margaret facilitated
the work of Technical and Policy Advisory Committees and coordinates with
Department of Ecology and other state agencies to ensure that key technical
issues involving marine shore processes, water quality, public access and water-
dependent shordineuxeareaddmessed.Mar0aretabosmpportedCounrya1aM
with an extensive public outreach effort includ,ing a multi-day planning charrette
and a series of public meetings focused on key shoreline planning technical and
policy issues.
Ecology Puget Sound Watershed Characterization Project, WA. Project
Monager. ESA worked with the Department of Ecology, Puget Sound Partnership,
and Ecology's Watershed Technical Assistance Team to cornplete Phase 11 of the
Puget Sound Characterization Project. This project involved development of case
studies describing watershed characterization applications across Puget Sound;
development ofGUS story maps illustrating the case studies; creation ofau
interactive website to provide resources and decision support tools for planners,
scientists and the public using Ecology's watershed characterization data; and
preparation ofauser's manual describing how to use the characterization data
Aspo�atnmamage�Me�a�tover aovtheworkofE8A'x1ecbnkalkormamd '
coordinated closely with Ecology staff to ensure the Project's success. All tasks
were completed ootime and on budget and the deliverables were produced im
u nd er ten months.
Clallarn County SMp Update, WA. Project Manager, Margaret assisted ClaKam
County with all aspects nf the SMP update, Unique to this update prncessESA
developed asemi-quant�adwe approach toassessing and tracking mo net 'loss
using specific indicators. ESA also supported the no net loss assessment with a
detailed build out analysis at the parcel scale. To support the technical document
review process for the project, ESA developed a web-based mapping application
ucingArcG|S Server which includes over G0 data layer's showing inventory
information from a variety of local, state, and re&na( sources. ESA developed a
consistency review to assess the adequacy of the existing SNP; prepared a
integration strategy for integrating the critical areas regulations into the SMP;
conducted a comprehensive analysis tosupport the shoreline inventory and
characterization; and prepared a restoration plan. ESA is authored countywide
shoreline goals, policies, regulations, for review by the Planning Cornmission and
Board uf County Commissioners, ESA facilitated and coflaborated with County
staff and the shore6ne advisory committee to assess and review the implications
of various policy options.
HCCC In-Lieu Fee Program Support, Poutsbo,WA. Project Monager Margaret
helped the H[CC establish the Hood Canal |LP mitigation program, The HC[[|LF
|maninterbcm[ agency and non-profit sponsored program for completing
mitigation projects according to the latest federal requirements, The HCCC ILF
Program is unique in that it proposes to provide compensation for stream and
nearshore habitats in addition to freshwater wetlands, ESA helped document the
need for the /L; Program arid its potential benefits in the Program Prmspectus
m/hichwas approved by federal agendesim20II. ESA abohelped prepanethe 'LF
Instrument and technical appendices, which was approved /n20I2. ESA pnapa'ed
a detailed compensation planning �amevvurkthat idemtiM*show the credits a'd
debits w/i(|be calculated and ESA suppo�edHCC['u ongoing consu!tadomvv|t—'
the Interagency Reuiem/Teann.ESA developed am interim tool for calculating
''
nearshone debits and credits and have helped developed guidance for
determining credit and debits for streams and riparian buffers.
Puget Sound Pressures Assessment, Puget Sound Partnership, WA. Project
Manager, ESA is part of the contractor team working with the Puget Sound
Partnership om the Puget Sound Pressures Assessment (P8PA).TbepSPAixa
systematic, expert-based evaluation of the potential impact of stressors on
ecosystem endpoints within the Puget Sound Basin, The assessment (sintended
to inform and guide science and management priorities with mm updated and
prioritized list of pressures on the Puget Sound ecosystem. The PSPA uses an
expert elicitation process to systematically collect expert scientific judgment
about the vulnerability wf specific endpoints (such as Chinook salmon, forage fish
depremsional wedands.etc) tostressors (such as land cover a|teradons'non'point
`
source pollution, animal harvest, etc) across the terrestrial, freshwater,
nearshore, and marine domains.. Margaret oversaw and managed ESA's work on
this project which included helping tm refine the lists and definitions ufo1ressocs
and endAo{nts:helping map and quantify their distribution; facilitating the expert
elicitation process; arid working with the Puget Sound Science Panel and other
experts to analyze and interpret the results of the assessment,
City mY Tacoma Best Available Science Review, Tacoma, WA. Associote
Scientist. Christina is assisting with a review of the City's Critical Areas
Preservation Ordinance ([A9O) (Tacoma City Code TMCl3.lI) regulations as
required under the Growth Management Act for use o[ "best available science".
The City is looking to evaluate the best available science literature and data
compiled by the City as well am their existing CAPOregulations. ESA will provide
recommendations tu the City's literature inventory and review the CAPO
regulations for consistency with recent science for wetlands, streams, and their
buffers, and provide suggestions for revising the code.
Cityof'Lynnwoad Critical Areas Ordinance Update, Lynnwood, WA. 4sruciote
Scientist. The City ofLynnwood has contracted ESA to provide technical support
to update the City's Critical Areas Ordinance (CAU) (Lynnwood City Code LM[
l7.IO) regulations ax required under the Growth Management Act for use nf"best
available science". ESA will review portions of the CAO for consistency with best
available science,
Bowerman Field Airport Improvements, Hoquiem,WA. Biologist. The Port cf
Grays Harbor (Port) is planning several improvements at Bowerman Field located
in Hocluiam, Washington,, The airport was built by the Corps of Engineers in the
l94Vson Moon Island, with substantial additional dredged fill imported to
connect the island to the shoreline. Bowerman Field today is situated oma
peninsula of land that separates Bowerman Basin from the Grays Harbor estuary
and the mouth of the Chehalis River. The Grays Harbor National Wildlife Refuge, u
rnajor resting area for migrating shorebirds and a waterfowl concentration area,
encornpasses 1,500 acres of interticlal mudflats, salt marsh, and uplands in
Bowerman Basin.'The project will receive federal funding from the FAA and will
likely have wetiand impacts. A NEPA environmental assessment, Endangered
Species Act Section 7 compliance, and Section 40l/4V4 permits will bealso
required, Christina is currently assisting with presence/absence surveys for
streaked horned lark at the a1rport.
Christina is an environmental scientist with experience in various biological and
EDuCAflow
ecoioAica�projects of the PaciMcNo�hvvest. Her interd1sdpDnarybackground
��s^sn»/'»»�en��v
suppo�xbiological and regulatory monitoring, intensive Meldwor&e�o�s.species
sc�cnc��e�crn
^
. ,
idemdf�catiunundw�herda�ucoUecdon Recen��y[hr|stinareceivedcertiUcation
wnsmn�nnunweoi�
in the sdenceand moana0eooentofvve1ionds. She issk8iedin the idendficmtlmm^
���nousc:p»cem»m
deUneation and rating mf wetlands as well as regulations a the local, state, and
monageme^tcemGrate.
,
um,e,aqyo/woswngtun
federal levels.
zYsARS EXPERIENCE
Relevant Experience
City mY Tacoma Best Available Science Review, Tacoma, WA. Associote
Scientist. Christina is assisting with a review of the City's Critical Areas
Preservation Ordinance ([A9O) (Tacoma City Code TMCl3.lI) regulations as
required under the Growth Management Act for use o[ "best available science".
The City is looking to evaluate the best available science literature and data
compiled by the City as well am their existing CAPOregulations. ESA will provide
recommendations tu the City's literature inventory and review the CAPO
regulations for consistency with recent science for wetlands, streams, and their
buffers, and provide suggestions for revising the code.
Cityof'Lynnwoad Critical Areas Ordinance Update, Lynnwood, WA. 4sruciote
Scientist. The City ofLynnwood has contracted ESA to provide technical support
to update the City's Critical Areas Ordinance (CAU) (Lynnwood City Code LM[
l7.IO) regulations ax required under the Growth Management Act for use nf"best
available science". ESA will review portions of the CAO for consistency with best
available science,
Bowerman Field Airport Improvements, Hoquiem,WA. Biologist. The Port cf
Grays Harbor (Port) is planning several improvements at Bowerman Field located
in Hocluiam, Washington,, The airport was built by the Corps of Engineers in the
l94Vson Moon Island, with substantial additional dredged fill imported to
connect the island to the shoreline. Bowerman Field today is situated oma
peninsula of land that separates Bowerman Basin from the Grays Harbor estuary
and the mouth of the Chehalis River. The Grays Harbor National Wildlife Refuge, u
rnajor resting area for migrating shorebirds and a waterfowl concentration area,
encornpasses 1,500 acres of interticlal mudflats, salt marsh, and uplands in
Bowerman Basin.'The project will receive federal funding from the FAA and will
likely have wetiand impacts. A NEPA environmental assessment, Endangered
Species Act Section 7 compliance, and Section 40l/4V4 permits will bealso
required, Christina is currently assisting with presence/absence surveys for
streaked horned lark at the a1rport.
Prior to Working at ESA
Plant Community Surveys, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Northwest,
Silverdale, WA. Natural Resources Specialist Christina performed vegetation
surveys on naval property in the Puget Sound, She was responsible for
coordinating field crews, recording data, and writing technical reports. These
reports supported future management decisions by natural resource managers.
Bald eagle and Osprey monitoring Naval Facilities Engineering Command
Northwest, Silverdale, WA. Natural Resources Specialist. As per the Migratory
Bird Act and Eagle Act, Christina conducted field investigations of bald eagle and
osprey nests on five different naval properties. She summarized monitoring
results from the field effort and presented the results to natural resource
managers,
Forage Fish Surveys, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Northwest,
Silverdale, WA, Natural Resources Specialist. Christina assisted with forage fish
beach spawning surveys, following Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife
(WDFW) Intertidal Forage Fish Spawning, Habitat Survey protocols: procedures far
obtaining bulk beach substrate samples, She also processed sa rnpies and
analyzed them under a microscope, again following WDFVV protocols,
EDUCATION
w, Sc..6eogr ap»y,
wesjm n vm5hington
university
a�watiur3ll ResourCe
Ioaoagprneint, western
,Na5hmgtonunweo/ty
z YEARS EXPERIENCE
SOFTWARE
EXPERIENCE
E� SRI. Adobe SoRe.R,
5Pss.QGiS.maplbox,
Leaflet
SCRIPTING
EXPERIENCE
R, cSS, Python, HTML,
Jonathan Kem
GIS Analyst
Jonathan "]onmy" Kemp isaGiS Analyst and brings two years cf experience io
analyzing visual data, spatial analytics'and providing GI8 support for a variety ef
projects. Jonny possess a unique agility in learning new software. and techniques to
solve new and challenging spatial problems. Using ESRI or Open Source Geospatial
software he performs spatial analysis and creates dynarnic maps and graphics
suited specif ical ly towa rd ea ch project's need s. J onny a [so possesses excellent
research, writing, and cartographic skills. Most recently for his Masters research,
Jomny has become proficient in data management using MnngoDBto create a
repository for community resilience data and metadata.
City of Edmonds Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO) Update, King County, WA. @0
Analyst. ESA is preparing an update to the City's BAS report to reflect current
scientific research applicable to the Edmonds area, is reviewing the existing critical
area regulations for consistency with the updated BAS report, and will recommend
changes to the City's critical area regulations needed for consistency with the
current scientific thinking and legal requirements, while recognizing the urban
environment and state agency guidance, The consultant will also significantly assist
the City with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review of the updated
critical area reguta,tions, Jonny aided in initial analyzing the city's current CAO to
identify key areas that need to be updated. Specifically Jonny was instrumental in
finding gap areas of potential wetlands. To accomplish this, a supervised flow
analysis using LXDAR and the latest NA}9 aerial satellite lmaQery was used,
Squa(licum Creek Corridor Trail, Creek, & Road Design, Bellingham, WA. G/S
Analyst. ESA is providing environmental assistance to the City of Bellingham to
construct two projects *ithin the SquuUcunm Creek corridor: comstruct|mgesegment
of the Bay-to-Baker Trail and extending Orchard Street, These projects are
physically and temporalty interconnected with two additional projects, James
Street Road improvements and the Squaficum Creek reroute project. In addition to
the delineation of approximately 10 acres of wetlands and strearns over an area of
200 acres and complete environmental permitting for the first two projects, ESA
coordinated with the other project teams on impact determinations, environmental
permitting, and mitigation for all mF these projects. Mitigation for wetland and
stream impacts is being combined at a single site, with a phased implementation
approach, in order to maximize ecological uplift while rninir-nizing mitigation design
and construction costs, The selected site will include wetland creation, wetland
enhancement, and wetland buffer/riparian corridor improvements, ESA io
responsible for mitigation planning, site selection, and design at the selected site.
Jonmy worked with various staff to meet permitting figure needs, Tmdo this various
datasetoim6uding impacts, wetlands, and existing conditions had tmbeoverlaid,
Jonny also worked to generate a summary of affected parcels within the project
Birch Bay Drive & Pedestrian Facility & Beach Nourishment) VWhatcormCounty,
WA. G73Anolyxt, The seaside community cf Birch Bay has experienced significant
beach erosion since the Corps excavated gravel fromtheBayimtheI95B`sand
created a sediment deficit that altered the natural beach erosion and accretion
processes. Bulkheads, riprap revetments, a nd groins constructed to stabilize the
beach and protect Birch Bay Drive and adjacent development from scour and
flooding have not been successful and have lowered the quality of the Bay's
recreational amenities and habitat. As an alternative to constructing additional
shore protection structures, ESA is designing a sustainable 1.6 mile Soft shore
pm improve
enhance shore access, improve stormwater drainage, and protect water quality
while improving natural coastal geologic and ecological processes. Jonny has been
key in providing high quality figures, These figures illustrate the alignment of the
soft shore protection perm, critical gemtech locations, and relevant archeological
find concerns.
City ofDuvall W&6ISAnolyst ESA helped the City of
Duval secure Ecology National Estuary Program grant funds to develop watershed.,
based land use planning tools, including a stormwater strategies plan, ESA is
working with the City and partners to complete uoabbasiocharacterization
extending throughout the City and surrounding areas. Characterization iobeing
completed by ESA's multi-disciplinary team consistent with EcoIogy's Puget Sound-
wide characterizadon.ESAwviKinterpritchoracterizadomresuitstoanswerkeyland-
use managernent questions that the City is facing: identification of "development
capacity" for Duva0^ssubbasins^ including focus onhydrologic and water quality
implications; and effective approaches to manage and improve stormwater runoff
from existing and future development. ESAuvNldeveiopaotorrn,vaterxtroteg/es
plan that prioritizes areas to target stormwater capital investment. Jonny worked to
provide summary statistics on characterization results for various Policy Analysis
Units, He worked to develop a mapbook highlighting the relevant results in relation
to the city of Duvall, Jonny has also worked within Excel, Arcrnap, Illustrator, and
InDeai0nto help create stormwwater strategy summary sheets.
Muk|&eo Watershed Based Stovmmmxater Plan. WA. G/3Anolyst. The City of
Mukibeois experiencing unnaturally high peak stream flows, low summer flows,
and decreased water quality associated with increased levels of development, For
this project ESA performed a watershed scale analysis that built upon Ecology's
Puget Sound Characterization (Stanley et al, 2011�, This used the regional
characterization combined with finer resolution data such as land cover, streams
and wetlands data, and stormwater infrastructure to evaluate how intact the
watershed processes are atm local scale, ESA used the results toidentify
appropriate stmrmvvatermanagement strategies that target valuable and impaired
processes within each sub-basin. In addition, ESA analyzed sediment export
potential; fish habitat; and a third parameter developed to quantify hydrologic
connectivity, to prioritize the implementation of stormwater management
strategies. ESA documented the analysis methods, results and recommendations in
a5corm»*ater Strategies Plan and is currently working with the city tm use this to
support the StormwaterM aster Plan Update. Jonny worked closely with hydro|mgist
to Update drainage basin information based mn the best available data,
EDUCATION
w�'Fom,,,t Reso�(',Os�
Urban Horhc fture
oniveoity o� Was»�ngton
a,c. Environmental and
R emvoeSc i en ce'
unmeo:ty a f[a I ffox~a.
oax�s
E Scott Olmsted
Senior Ecologist
Scott is an ecologist with 14 years of experience working on a variety of wetland and
stream ecosystem projects. Scott has identified wetland boundaries, rated and
categorized wetlands, assessed habitat opportunity and potential, and clocurnented
wetland and upland vegetation. He has also been responsible for the, preparation of
environmental docurnents in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations;
provided technical writing support for a range of natural resource projects; and
coordinated permit approval with regulatory agency staff and clients.
14 YEARS EXPERIENCE Relevant Experience
HCCC In-Lieu Fee (|LF) Program, WA. Ecologist. Scott helped HC[Cestabiuham|UF
mitigation program. The HCCC ILF isan interlocalagency and non-profit sponsored
program for completing mitigation projects accord ingto the latest fed era i
requirements, Studies of compensatory mitigation in Washington State and across the
country show that most mitigation sites fail to achieve performance standards or
replace lost or damaged functions. Federal regulations have identified ILF programs
uaapntendai option ta correct these shoMzem| rigs. ULFprugronmscomsoQdate
mitigation projects to target rnore ecologically significant functions at a watershed
scale. The HCCC ILF Program is unique in that it proposes to provide compensation for
stream and nearshore habitats in addition to freshwater wetlands. ESA helped
document the need for the ILF Program and its potential benefits in the Program
Prospectus, which was approved by federal agencies in 2011. We also helped prepare
the ILF Instrument and technical appendices including a detailed compensation
planning framework that identifies how the credits and debits will be calculated. Tile
ILF program was certified by the Corps, Ecology, and EPA in 2012, ESA is also
supporting HCCC's ongoing consultation with the Interagency Review Team. We have
developed an interim tool for calculating nearshore debits, arid credits and have
helped developed guidance for determining credit and debits for streams and riparian
buffers.
Mason County SMP, Shelton, WA. Ecologist. Scott supported Inventory and
Characterization efforts to assist Mason County and the City of Shelton on updating
dheir5MPs. Mason County and the City have almost 5B8 miles of freshwater shorelines
and about 220 miles of marine shorelines, including Skokomish River, Goldsborough
Creek, Goose Lake, Hood Canal, and Oakland Bay. The Mason County and Shelton
SMPs are anticipated tobe adopted by June 2OI3. ESA prepared draft shoreline
inventory and characterization reports and accompanying map folios for the County
and the City. The reports are undergoing revisions im response tu public and Ecology
review, Future work includes development of restoration plans, assessment of
cumulative Impacts, and completion of draft SMPs for state review and approval,
PSNERP Nearshore Conceptual Designs, WA. Project Coordinator. Scott assisted
with project management responsibilities for this Project, PSNERPimalarge-scale
ecosyxtem study uf the Puget Sound led by the U.Ei Army Corps nfErgineemand
WDFW with support from other state, local and federal agencies, tribes, industries and
envirummenta(orgonizot|oms.ES&supportedPSNERPonmuitipleaspectsufthis
project. We served as the lead contractor responsible for developing conceptual
restoration designs for nearshore sites throughout Puget Sound, This work involved
assessing a nd cha racteri zing restoration opportunities and constraints on 44 sites
representing a wide range of geornorphic systems. For each site, the ESA team
developed two restoration alternatives: a full restoration option that fully removes
ecosystem stressors, and a partial restoration option that recognizes site constraints
such as property ownership. ESA's conceptual design report presents restoration
alternatives in, terms of ecological effectiveness arid engineering feasibility. The
design report identified all of the major restoration elements, the expected ecological
evolution of each site, the restoration risks and uncertainties, and the response of the
restored site to climate changes such as sea level rise. The goal of this work was to
provide adequate detail to enable PSNERP to evaluate restoration costs arid benefits
and select a Suite of sites and actions that will comprise a strategic nearshore
restoration strategy for Puget Sound,
Willamette Partnership Stream Assessment Services for EPA Streams Project No.
8565, OR. Project CoomdinotmrScottcoondinatedESA'seffortstmdeveopasbream
functions assessment mmethodoim8y(AoxessmentMethodu|ogy)horstatew/de
application in Oregon to assess the site/reach scale impact of proposed and permitted
actions to functions, as well as the replacement (predicted and actuaf) of unavoidable
impacts and compensatory mitigation. The Assessment Methodology will allow users
to calculate baseline stream function and calculate predicted changes in function
resulting from impact or mitigation projects. The Assessment Methodology will
include an instruction manual and datasheets, so that a stream professional with two
days of training can apply the Assessment Methodology. In addition to strearn
functions, a separate values assessment that is distinct from the assessment of stream
functions will occur to evaluate the opportunity for a stream to provide a particular
function, and the local significance of that function, This project will support work
conducted by the Project Partners (Willamette Partnership, DSL, USACE, and the
Environmental Protection Agency Region 10) to develop a statewide stream
classification system and function-based stream mitigation framework for Oregon to
effectively implement stream mitigation policy under the Federal Compensatory
Mitigation Rule and the Oregon Removu|-FO|Law.
Ecology Puget Sound Watershed Characterization, Phase 2, WA. Ecologist, Scott
supported HCCC's case study and website story map development for this project,
ESA worked with Ecology, the Partnership, and the Ecology Watershed Technical
Assistance Team tu assist |n the completion of Phase Unf the Puget Sound
Characterization Project. This work includes identifying priority areas for stormwater
retrofits thorough Puget Sound, ESA will also be developing a decision support tool
that shows planners and citizens how to integrate, interpret and apply the results of
the Puget Sound Characterization to planning actions. ESA will create an integrated
set of solutions to water quality, hydrology and habitat problems linked to distinct
geogrophic areas. VVe are a|so creating avvebsite that dixp(ays the assessment
information ina manner that is easy 10 assess, interpret, and apply.