Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBLD2008-00065 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TYPE I LAND USE PERMIT APPLICANT: AIMEE & KEN MCMILLEN 1734 OAK BAY ROAD PORT/HAADLOCK WA 98339 DATE ISSUED: 7(3 (`O DATE EXPIRES:7/3 do MLA NUMBER:MLA08-00064 PROJECT PLANNER:Michelle Farfan PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NEW SFR W/A/G 250 GAL PROPANE TANK PROJECT LOCATION: Parcel Number 921 073 020, Section 7, Township 29, Range 1E, WM, Located on Oak Bay Road, Port Hadlock, WA 98339 CONDITIONS: 1.) PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY, PROPONENT SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN LETTER FROM KATE WADDELL, NTI STATING THAT THE STORMWATER FACILITY HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE"DRAINAGE &EROSION CONTROL REPORT" DATED July 28, 2008 AS SIGNED BY KATE WADDELL OF NTI. 2.) PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY, PROPONENT SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN LETTER FROM THE GEOLOGIST WHO PREPARED THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT DATED JULY 3, 2007 BY NTI STATING THAT THE STRUCTURE AND/OR FACILITIES HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE "GEOTECHNICAL REPORT." THE LETTER SHALL BE STAMPED BY THE LICENSED GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER. 3.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 4.) The property owner shall comply with Water Conservation Measures (per list maintained by the UDC Administrator). 5.) An Engineered Stormwater Site Plan prepared by NTI dated July 28, 2008 has been submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan and contact the Jefferson County Department of Community Development to arrange a schedule to inspect the property for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Department verifies plan compliance. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 6.) Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire, safety, health or sanitary hazard. 7.) Not more than 2 unlicensed vehicles shall be stored on any lot unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC. Outdoor storage of 3 or more junk motor vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an autormobile wrecking yard or junk (or salvage) yard and allowed as a permitted use in Table 3-1 or Chapter 18.18 JCC, and such storage shall meet the requriements of JCC 18.20.100, Automobile wrecking yards and junk (or salvage) yards. In no case, shall any such junk motor vehicles be stored in a critical area. 8.) A minimum of two (2) on-site parking spaces shall be provided for the single family residence. 9.) Maximum lot coverage is not to exceed 25%. Lot coverage is defined as amount of impervious surface which includes roof tops, driveways, concrete, etc. 10.) Minimum setback from Oak Bay Road right-of-way shall be 20 feet. Minimum north and south property setbacks shall be 5 feet. Minimum shoreline setback as identified on the submitted and approved site plan is 297 feet from the shoreline. 11.) Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet (20') in height from the finished grade, excepting when such lighting is an integral part of a building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. 12.) Lighting fixtures shall be designed and hooded to prevent the light source from being directly visible from outside the boundaries of the property. The intensity or brightness of all lighting, during construction and after project completion shall not adversely affect the use of surrounding properties or adjoining rights-of-way. 13.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 14.) A Geotechnical Report dated July 3, 2007 and an Addendum dated July 7, 2008 prepared by NTI was submitted in conjunction with this application. The report addressed the stability of the geologic hazard area. FINDINGS: 1.) The Administratorfinds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code, all other applicable ordinances and regulations, and is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map. 2.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on May 27 2008 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: suburbar shoreline designation; coastal SIPZ. 3.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drillec on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals (primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 4.) The parcel is located within a coastal SIPZ (seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Polio (Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002)that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but no history of chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in groundwater sources within 1000 feet. 5.) The applicant is proposing to create or add 3470 square feet of impervious surface and 2880 square feet of land disturbing activities. JCC 18.30.060 and 18.30.070 require the project applicant submit a stormwater plan meeting Minimum Requirements#1 through#5 of the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. The stormwater plan shall address measures to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction and shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 6.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 7.) The revised site plan dated June 16, 2008 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated July 30, 2008 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 8.) This approval is for a single family residence with 250 gallon above-ground propane tank only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 9.) The parcel has been designated as RR 1:5 under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 10.) An address of 2007 Oak Bay Road, Port Hadlock has been assigned to the parcel. Oak Bay Road is a county major collecor(C569908). 11.) The parcel is served by the Quimper public water system. 12.) A septic permit(SEP07-0284)was issued on July 25, 2008. A boundary line adjustment(SUB07-0011) was finaled on July 3, 2008. 13.) A Declaration of Restrictive Covenant has been recorded on July 23, 2008 under AFN 535878 for the purpose of restricting the septic capacity to a maximum three bedrooms. 14.) A Hold Harmless Indemnification Covenant has been recorded on July 31, 2008 under AFN 536102 due to the parcel being located within and/or near a large earth movement and slow downslope creep. NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local,state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable development and performance standards of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA,any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes"listed species(defined as causing harm, harassing,or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition,the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are induded as"critical habitat"for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline,freshwater shoreline,or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat,all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline,freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -Set back buildings,utilities and roads as far as possible from surface waters(streams, rivers,lakes,marine waters),or at least 150 feet from the edge of the water -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes,wetlands,and forested areas near surface waters -Remove minimal vegetation for site development,especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there -Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches Any individual, group,or agency can bring suit for a listed species"taking,"even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information,contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle at(206)526-6613,or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at(503)231-6121. APPEALS: Pursuant to RCW 36.70C,the applicant or any aggrieved party may appeal this final decision to Jefferson County Superior Court within twenty-one(2 )calendar days of the date of issuance of this land use decision. For more information related to judical appeals see JCC 18.40.340. i %�'`/1. :•. UDC Administra or MLA08-00064 3 of 3 DRAFT - NOT A VALID PERMIT JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TYPE I LAND USE PERMIT APPLICANT: AIMEE & KEN MCMILLEN 1734 OAK BAY ROAD PORT HADLOCK WA 98339 DATE ISSUED: 7/ t(6-e DATE EXPIRES: 7(31 (0? MLA NUMBER:MLA08-00064 PROJECT CONTACT: Michelle Farfan PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NEW SFR W/A/G 250 GAL PROPANE TANK PROJECT LOCATION: Parcel Number 921 073 020, Section 7, Township 29, Range 1E, WM, Located on Oak Bay Road, Port Hadlock, WA 98339 CONDITIONS: 1.) PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY, PROPONENT SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN LETTER FROM KATE WADDELL, NTI STATING THAT THE STORMWATER FACILITY HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE "DRAINAGE &EROSION CONTROL REPORT" DATED July 28, 2008 AS SIGNED BY KATE WADDELL OF NTI. 2.) PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING OCCUPANCY, PROPONENT SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN LETTER FROM THE GEOLOGIST WHO PREPARED THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT DATED JULY 3, 2007 BY NTI STATING THAT THE STRUCTURE AND/OR FACILITIES HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE "GEOTECHNICAL REPORT." THE LETTER SHALL BE STAMPED BY THE LICENSED GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER. 3.) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into underground aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island, Indian Island and within 1/4 mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff onsite. 4.) The property owner shall comply with Water Conservation Measures (per list maintained by the UDC Administrator). 5.) An Engineered Stormwater Site Plan prepared by NTI dated July 28, 2008 has been submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan and contact the Jefferson County Department of Community Development to arrange a schedule to inspect the property for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Department verifies plan compliance. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 6.) Outdoor residential storage shall be maintained in an orderly manner and shall create no fire, safety, health or sanitary hazard. 7.) Not more than 2 unlicensed vehicles shall be stored on any lot unless totally screened from view of neighboring dwellings and rights-of-way. Such screening shall meet all applicable performance and development standards specific to the district in which the storage is kept, and shall be in keeping with the character of the area. Screening shall meet the requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC. Outdoor storage of 3 or more junk motor vehicles is prohibited except in those districts where specified as an autormobile wrecking yard or junk (or salvage)yard and allowed as a permitted use in Table 3-1 or Chapter 18.18 JCC, and such storage shall meet the requriements of JCC 18.20.100, Automobile wrecking yards and junk (or salvage) yards. In no case, shall any such junk motor vehicles be stored in a critical area. 8.) A minimum of two (2) on-site parking spaces shall be provided for the single family residence. 9.) Maximum lot coverage is not to exceed 25%. Lot coverage is defined as amount of impervious surface which includes roof tops, driveways, concrete, etc. 10.) Minimum setback from Oak Bay Road right-of-way shall be 20 feet. Minimum north and south property setbacks shall be 5 feet. Minimum shoreline setback as identified on the submitted and approved site plan is 297 feet from the shoreline. 11.) Exterior lighting for residential uses shall not exceed twenty feet (20') in height from the finished grade, excepting when such lighting is an integral part of a building or structure. Ground level lighting is encouraged. 12.) Lighting fixtures shall be designed and hooded to prevent the light source from being directly visible from outside the boundaries of the property. The intensity or brightness of all lighting, during construction and after project completion shall not adversely affect the use of surrounding properties or adjoining rights-of-way. 13.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 14.) A Geotechnical Report dated July 3, 2007 and an Addendum dated July 7, 2008 prepared by NTI was submitted in conjunction with this application. The report addressed the stability of the geologic hazard area. FINDINGS: 1.) The Administrator finds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code,all other applicable ordinances and regulations,and is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map. 2.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on May 27 2008 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: suburbar shoreline designation; coastal SIPZ. 3.) Marine shorelines and islands are susceptible to a condition that is known as seawater intrusion. Seawater intrusion is a condition in which the saltwater/freshwater interface in an aquifer moves inland so that wells drillec on upland areas cannot obtain freshwater suitable for public consumption without significant additional treatment and cost. Maintaining a stable balance in the saltwater/freshwater interface is primarily a function of the rate of aquifer recharge (primarily through rainfall) and the rate of groundwater withdrawals (primarily through wells). The Washington Department of Ecology is the agency with statutory authority to regulate groundwater withdrawal for individual wells in Jefferson County. New development, redevelopment, and land use activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines in particular should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge and maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible by infiltrating stormwater runoff so that it recharges the aquifer. 4.) The parcel is located within a coastal SIPZ (seawater intrusion protection zone) according to the County GIS map. There are voluntary and mandatory measures identified in the Jefferson County Seawater Intrusion Polio (Resolution 44-22, effective September 23, 2002)that apply to well drilling proposals and building permit applications on existing lots of record. A Coastal SIPZ is defined as: all islands and area within one-quarter mile of marine shoreline, but no history of chloride concentration above 100 mg/L in groundwater sources within 1000 feet. 5.) The applicant is proposing to create or add 3470 square feet of impervious surface and 2880 square feet of land disturbing activities. JCC 18.30.060 and 18.30.070 require the project applicant submit a stormwater plan meeting Minimum Requirements#1 through#5 of the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. The stormwater plan shall address measures to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction and shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 6.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 7.) The revised site plan dated June 16, 2008 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated July 30, 2008 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 8.) This approval is for a single family residence with 250 gallon above-ground propane tank only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. 9.) The parcel has been designated as RR 1:5 under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 10.) An address of 2007 Oak Bay Road, Port Hadlock has been assigned to the parcel. Oak Bay Road is a county major collecor(C569908). 11.) The parcel is served by the Quimper public water system. 12.) A septic permit(SEP07-0284)was issued on July 25, 2008. A boundary line adjustment(SUB07-0011)was finaled on July 3, 2008. 13.) A Declaration of Restrictive Covenant has been recorded on July 23, 2008 under AFN 535878 for the purpose of restricting the septic capacity to a maximum three bedrooms. 14.) A Hold Harmless Indemnification Covenant has been recorded on July 31, 2008 under AFN 536102 due to the parcel being located within and/or near a large earth movement and slow downslope creep. NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local,state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable development and performance standards of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted,and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA,any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes"listed species (defined as causing harm,harassing,or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition,the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County are included as"critical habitat"for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline,freshwater shoreline,or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat,all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline,freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -Set back buildings,utilities and roads as far as possible from surface waters (streams, rivers,lakes,marine waters),or at least 150 feet from the edge of the water -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes,wetlands,and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development,especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there - Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches Any individual, group,or agency can bring suit for a listed species"taking",even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information,contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle at(206)526-6613,or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service at(503)231-6121. APPEALS: Pursuant to RCW 36.70C,the applicant or any aggrieved party may appeal this final decision to Jefferson County Superior Court within twenty-one (21)calendar days of the date of issuance of this land use decision. For more information related to judical appeals see UDC Section 8.5.2. 11.1� - UDC Admini �� • MLA08-000• ;"4."- .}^ s4 1.F fe Me0 . — • — — 2°,,,,,x„r peon 9 _ — o-1 ,.; =;:i 't� ddaoz _ _ _ ✓ C"°-3 CA t ,"ee :' IHd D d _ m a. d a r 4v E. i 8 2 gr 2 d d — o po / `° g5 Cn 4 T 13 \. �/ • /y gmg yPOc < o •oy � o d � dd � 0 l'l oh f) � m co Vm o o j1m /.-,% - _ P� o .t Q • uN cQ , o /17///2-,qiii l �1 0. °,/7 sijOyQ. 0 (07. \ \`' 7 , , -, . z., m 7 7 /o D a N / � ' a \ / ° ✓ \ \ � • go § N. 8a ' I \',' ® , •b //J O i' (I ° ✓ /i f ,. c Q 1 �� �I l m O �'�` H� „ 1 3 I � �I N0- •o I .� � doL.`t1 \ \ 1 co n 'l �, `• 1 •11 :i= ii < y��t `1 ` 1 � 1 \ 1 \ 1 1111 ar 5 N —.*– =_ C 1 V 1 11 A 1 \ 11 ` A 1 A 1, 1 1 o n 0,0. __/-‘,"" Z1 X11 1 1 0 1 \ \ \ n \ \1 11 \ 11 \ \1 11� `1 \\ \ \\` 11\ \ e . co B o E - 1� \ \ 1 \ 1 1\ \. \1 '1 1, t ' , la . v 1 \ 1 \ 11 ' 6. r. £ CD- w c 0 O tt3 F m If O -� .art ✓ �, a y� tD -48 .8 < = .1 LT I 7.1 K a �'9 r 7 O O^ O u N l �' � o a y _- Vm l m -1 o N Z • b N G 2 pp �7 co n N ►'3 N 0 7 1 J - . c 1111 n 5 O SU\I .� C_Y A� N = = T` Y V Y 0p —... 5 i`Noi ,` ' 1���. ���VV _- N . __ "� cam G.. CO O ° �f° 1-∎''` N cp Q o t W p = e � `C Z O co . O N vO n 0 $ { GI i=2 -< TI .. N cl 7O �Z y ^ a W o l' O O r v m m ., z C73 m n. I C v Z peon/e9 WO ,. 0 • _ • ° rr I � �) K uJj a 4 2 vdg _ C7 n m r D 7 ma c d `. g m r r ». m Q ,v Iv _. �, o N gyp, C�C m a p Z _ -.I N Q C N N O C 1 C11 F, O N a W T y m II Q g W N C o— a ?. n m 1 D ° o S' ( m N o m E dJ } • JLS GROUP INC. A NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, INC. 7 717 SOUTH PEABODY STREET,PORT ANGELES,WA 98362 Engineers•Land Surveyors•Geologists Construction Inspection■Materials Testing NTI (360)452-8491 1-800-654-5545 FAX 452-8498 E-Mail:infoenti4u.com February 8, 2010 Department of Community Development Attn: Michelle Farfan 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend WA 98368 Subject: MLA08-00064 Final Inspection & Onsite Redesign Dear Ms. Farfan: At the request of the owners, the stormwater system was redesigned during construction. Due to the site grades and site hazards noted in the Geotechnical Report, the constructed house and driveway are a "postage stamp" area approximately in the middle of the site. Allowing the majority of the site to remain well vegetated, and the total pollution generating impervious surface is still less than 5,000 sf. The site has no pollution generating pervious surface. All stormwater runoff caused from the improvements have been diverted down slope of site hazards and redesigned to minimize the impact to down slope properties. No onsite detention is required since the discharge point is a large saltwater body via infiltration at the vegetated high water line. See attached plan with hand-written design changes. The vegetated high water line of Oak Bay is on the down slope neighbor's property. Thous i the down slope neighbor's have given written permission, see attached, and are family members, I highly recommend a drainage easement be recorded with Jefferson County since the property may change hands in the future. Note: It is now the property owners' responsibility to inspect, maintain and repair the entire drainage system regularly. This is especially true following a storm event. Sincerely, NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, INC. 4R , •iterr �, • r //j,„0 ti il( P . . i!V � , Kate Waddell, P.E. } f, �`�p •�� 0.4230 .7 ','�� `'•�' C� Design Engineer ' • '��1sT-a��<�`�` ' LEXFnES_08/20;1j 1 Attachments FEB 16 2010 a...vovonormare woo 5 olomovw iLN M•05.5 N377IPPPI N3>I I' 33,1'11/-210d •... -.::. Z.: ••••...", ••■••.-•"^-, 11N30 107 7P1S3d .. ...... •••#•- -,-0-, ....., ... ....... 3N1 331#10141#1:11 NiE1133ANIINON NV-1,1 70,1(11%100 NOISOff3 ?? 301:W117210 -----0--=– : - —,-- 7. .- 9,11., ‘1,,_ ,-,t ,7 se_ t . T I I 1 " ,-,, 0 1 P , z .. d ',, '`• A1A_ __, •-1 o„, ,- i g i t ' .-I ' r' 1'r • 5". '1 , f- 71 4 '•# ' 3 .47 q l 2 0 ' 4 • \ 1"(4 ! ..' -,-..--t--' ".I° • x" " 1 i '' F < e._-) '4} '7„ .'1 P < ■•• -4 , ., , -, ' :*44'-3-•‘2, a,/ „',/o , 1_, ...-.- .; 5L Pat .5 '.—V---- , .._ . 4 .$ -.i 4-. 1 E } a ..... ,-. --, .., r, 4, AY A '`-. - --1 ./...t. k % ri b 1 35.7 i _& il .1 , V it 1 -•• 4. A ... R x \ 1-1 4 1- i'-. 4:1 '-') -.,•%-i--1# .6' 11"1 i !I t; -‘.3.” f• 2' .4.• 2 tt -11' A ,,,-, -. ..,-,. -, 4'. 4,1-4, i i 1/ t .1 h t \''Sv 7.. Z-NkV1'1. ■ 1/ I I 14 .-10-1.4,-; I- / "..t '4: /Pr, , „„, 4.1„, • #t : il g ' --:. . i th t . Z e r;:e,1, 1:14- ‘ ..4 s --o ..s, OPPG•jrup ------. _ _.-3------7—---- togOl "v .,...... . ,..... - - ,., e .4.1 1.1_, vL;., at i t.,• ! : ,\ % \d'' \ -s•V.•5. —.t I.- ,N 14 „ ,■ ,, • :15 ', II I :I^ t 3 rto \ li i Ili i i ell „ 1 1 111 0. - E • ---1.-e. .-1 „----" . - "' \111 \ k- •*."1''t : ;1 ,, "„,:12,, ' R n I i i – 4 , (1-. ipp '..■'. , 4 "1" ""N,„ 1 1 --.."""-•-0 # 1 ,-.. ....-....,7 . g z- -;..„ ....... . ; %....,., ,,:-., Xii : ......,. 5 -- 7-,.. -e4 --,, • "gn 1 400, 1... 0 - i N ii -111,1,1 . 4 i- -• V ; , ikt_ ,t ill \ ;77., kg eWl"-irl-11 k. tiCli 41-- t v /11,11 '} K\ il ,2ii 1 --;.2 t 1 A471. 1.71ZZ r V /■Vii ''''1.,,,'", 211N1'°11 i 11 VII \7'()'\5') N / 11 ii ./ ...- . ..--,..„, .1, , kliPi -.A — il _ it .,- ill it 1 1 --------.---- ---•-•------- OAK_BAY ROAD _----,---— FEB 16 2010 , ii 2 JLS GROUP, INC. NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, INRECEIVED 717 SOUTH PEABODY STREET,PORT ANGELES,WA 98362 jamv Engineers•Land Surveyors•Geologists Construction Inspection•Materials Testing Ni '! (360)452-8491 1-800-654-5545 FAX 452-8498 E-Mail:infoc nti4u.com WPC( � I CUUHIY DC February 8, 2010 � UOOg -C73 MO Department of Community Development Attn: Michelle Farfan 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend WA 98368 Subject: MLA08-00064 Final Inspection & Onsite Redesign Dear Ms. Farfan: At the request of the owners, the stormwater system was redesigned during construction. Due to the site grades and site hazards noted in the Geotechnical Report, the constructed house and driveway are a "postage stamp" area approximately in the middle of the site. Allowing the majority of the site to remain well vegetated, and the total pollution generating impervious surface is still less than 5,000 sf. The site has no pollution generating pervious surface. All stormwater runoff caused from the improvements have been diverted down slope of site hazards and redesigned to minimize the impact to down slope properties. No onsite detention is required since the discharge point is a large saltwater body via infiltration at the vegetated high water line. See attached plan with hand-written design changes. The vegetated high water line of Oak Bay is on the down slope neighbor's property. Though the down slope neighbor's have given written permission, see attached, and are family members, I highly recommend a drainage easement be recorded with Jefferson County since the property may change hands in the future. Note: It is now the property owners' responsibility to inspect, maintain and repair the entire drainage system regularly. This is especially true following a storm event. Sincerely, r11, NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, INC. � `,' ) 4 i. I, f4 Kate Waddell, P.E. A. ;,' � 43230 I Design Engineer clsrF•R`' 1 a'' roxrAL ,e( Attachments ��� O8/2o�l TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: By my signature below, I give permission for Kenneth L. and Aimee McMillen to have use of our drainage at 261 Yarr Road, Port Hadlock, WA for their drainage purposes in accordance with their building permit #08-00065. ROBERT EUGENE YARR January 10, 2010 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: By my signature below, I give permission for Kenneth L. and Aimee McMillen to have use of our property, parcel #921182006, for their drainage purposes in accordance with the building permit #08-00065. MCMILLEN FAMILY TRUST - Jeanne M. McMillen, Trustee January 10, 2010 07/31/2008 01:04P RECEIPT # 55693 JEFFERSON COUNTY AUDIlUR ` \ OFFICE 0ONNA H ELDRIDGE FROM : KENNETH MCMILLEN BY : BRENDA FILE NO. S36102 # P�s: 4 01:04P DOC.: (C0V) COVENANT 45°00 `^'-- TOTAL RECORDING FEE > 46^00 Check # ~~-~> 2029 45.00 KENNETH HCMXLLEN AMOUNT (Check) RECEIVED -~~~> 4S.00 CHANGE > 0.00 *** RECEIPT *** 11 II 1111 I I IIUI P5ag3e Jefferson County lud KENNETH MCMILLEN COV31145 00 04P AFTER RECORDING,RETURN TO: Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Avenue Port Townsend,WA 98368 HOLD HARMLESS INDEMNIFICATION COVENANT Grantors: Aimee & Ken McMillen, husband and wife. Grantee: Jefferson County, a political subdivision and governmental entity within Washington State THIS COVENANT is entered into on this 'D day of ,,(jArle _ 2008, by Grantor(s) Aimee & Ken McMillen, whose mailing address is 1734 Oak Bay Road, Port Hadlock, 98339 (hereinafter "Grantor(s)"). This Covenant shall constitute a burden upon, touch upon and run with the real property described herein. Legal description: Grantor(s) hold legal title to the following described real property located That portion of the North 12 3/4 acres of even width of Government Lot 1, Section 18, Township 29 North, Range 1 East, WM described as follows: Beginning at the meander corner between Sections 7 and 18 of Township 29 North, Range 1 East, W.M.; thence West on the common section line, 554 feet to the northwest corner of Government Lot 1 of said Section 18; thence South 168 feet; thence Easterly to the meander line at a point 225 feet, more or less, south of the point of beginning; and the northerly limits of that property described in Jefferson County Auditor's File Number 114458; thence North along the meander line to the point of beginning; Together with the south 100 feet of Government Lot 4, Section 7, Township 29 North, Range 1 East, W.M. • II II IIII 1111111 III II I 11 P52: 2of4 Jefferson County Pod KENNETH MCMILLEN COV31'45000 104P 2007 Oak Bay Road, Port Hadlock, WA 98339 Assessor's Property Tax parcel no. 921073020 Grantor(s) applied for and, upon execution of this agreement, shall receive a building permit as per RCW 19.27, the International Building Code, and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code (Title 18 Jefferson County Code or "JCC") to allow for the construction of a single family residence and associated stormwater facilities and associated septic system and components within a Geological Hazard Area as defined by Chapter 18.15 JCC. THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT A PERMIT OF ANY TYPE. In accordance with and in consideration of allowing the construction of a retaining wall in an Environmentally Sensitive Area, Grantor(s) acknowledge, covenant, and agree as follows: 1. Grantor(s) desire to construct a single family residence with associated stormwater facilities and septic system and components. The property is situated within an area of slow downslope creep and adjacent to a large earth movement landslide hazard area. Grantor(s) agree that they are fully aware of the risks inherent in building within a landslide hazard area. 2. Grantor(s), as their own free and voluntary act, accept and assume all risks of loss or damage arising out of the conditions described herein, and further agree to relieve Grantee, its agencies, divisions, officers, agents, and employees of any liability, damages, claims or other expenses that might arise as a result of or allegedly as the result of this approval of the development and the engineering design of the Grantors proposed development. 3. Grantor(s) agree to and shall hold harmless and indemnify Grantee, its agencies, divisions, officers, agents and employees from and against any and all liability, loss, claims, suits, damages, costs or expenses (including attorney's fees) that may at any time arise, occur II 1111111111111111 111111! 536102 VIII II III Page: 3 of 4 Jefferson County Pud KENNETH MCMILLEN COV31/45 00 104P or be generated as a result of any reduction in the fair market value of the Grantor(s)' property and/or any damage to personal property or personal injury by reason of the conditions existing now or any time hereafter on or around the Grantor(s)' property, or due to any construction or development or design pursuant to the building permit, septic permit, or any other development permits issued thereunder by Grantee and/or its agencies, divisions, employees, agents, officers or representatives pursuant to any then applicable state statute, regulation, administrative code or County Ordinance. 4. Grantor(s) agree that their representation herein and agreement to hold harmless and indemnify Grantee shall be binding upon the Grantor(s) as well as their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall run with the land described herein and shall touch upon the land described herein. The Grantor(s) further agree that this agreement may be enforced by Grantee in law or equity against the Grantor(s), or their heirs, successors and assigns. 5. Grantee shall record upon the land records maintained and generated by the Auditor of Jefferson County, Washington this Hold Harmless and Indemnification Covenant. 6. This Covenant shall not be revoked or amended without the consent of the Grantee, pursuant to an adopted resolution by the Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners entered during an open public meeting. 7. For the purposes of this Covenant, any phrase or sentence that is conjugated in the singular shall also include the plural and any phrase or sentence that is conjugated in the plural shall also include the singular. 1111111 El III 1111 III II 536102 Page 4 of 4 Jefferson County Rud KENNETH MCMILLEN 27:11471800°1 "13 OV31/45000 10413 THIS COVENANT is in effect as of the day and year first written above. GRANTORS Aimee McMillen L r f / .,o,.E C TKen McMillen ¢r l ''"' p , ' :G P -,, . -s O 7:,4 1�.r- STA I'E OF WASHINGTON ) "-i ' 2c )ss. %O.•Pi *?--7 C � =� COUNTY OF ) •4.1.6S,' " wASH� ''�',,,, ,,,f,,,, I certify that I know of or have satisfactory evidence that Aimee and Ken McMillen, signed this Hold Harmless and Indemnification Covenant and acknowledged it to be their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. DATED this O day of �(,Q,v0 , 206 Print name: ,� _ _.JrS, NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State f Washington, County of J-!-e, yL , residing at . t}Y 0lIoCL . My commission expires: ( .294I1. Approved by the Jefferson County Unified Development Code Administrator: Date: 4:,)30 1 Staclg-FIos ins, Unified Development Code Administrator Approved as to form: Jefferson County By its Prosecuting Attorney By: 3 O Ar- Date: 6, 23 he For Juelanne Dalzell, County Pr ecuting Attorney 18\) ECEIVED JUL 2 8 2008 JEffERSON COUNit uCO DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL REPORT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2007 OAK BAY ROAD, PORT HADLOCK JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON PARCEL B OF THE WOOD SURVEY LOCATED IN SECTION 7 & 18, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M. Prepared for Ken & Aimee McMillen A \� U. WgO SA^1/D 4 L3 , vat F�1SiE�F' .��� - - F SS/ONA'L EaV Prepared by Kate Waddell, P.E. NTI Engineering & Land Surveying 717 South Peabody Port Angeles, WA 98362 360-452-8491 APPROVED www.nti4u.com STORMWATER PLAN July 28, 2008 JEFFER S . •UN DEPT.OFF 1' : E M T IF SIGNATURE ���IL . .I/i� INTRODUCTION NTI Engineering and Land Surveying was hired by Ken & Aimee McMillen to develop a drainage and erosion control plan and report for their proposed residential home site at 2007 Oak Bay Road, Port Hadlock, Jefferson County in Section 7 & 18, Township 29 North, Range 1 East. As part of this analysis, a stormwater collection and on-site infiltration system has been designed and a temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control plan has been prepared for the construction of a private single-family residence and driveway. II. DESCRIPTION OF SITE The home site is a 2.19 acre parcel off Oak Bay Road. The lot is bordered on the north and south by residential lots. The site will be accessed via Oak Bay Road from the west. The lot is undeveloped and heavily covered with native vegetation. The upper portion of the site slopes to the east at approximately 10%. Parcel A separates this lot from Oak Bay, a marine water body. III. METHODOLOGY Jefferson County requires the use of the Department of Ecology (DOE) February 2005 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. Based on the manual, new development with a proposed impervious area greater than 2,000 square feet but less than 5,000 square feet and a conversion of native vegetation to lawn of less than 3/ of an acre determines minimum requirements 1 through 5 shall be applied to this property. These minimum requirements are and will be met as follows: Minimum Requirement #1 Preparation of Stormwater Site Plan • A complete site plan has been included in the appendix of this report. Minimum Requirement #2 Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) • The SWPPP includes twelve elements. Each element will be addressed separately as follows: Element #1 Mark Clearing Limits o The majority of the site will remain undisturbed. Prior to beginning land disturbing activities the construction area shall be clearly marked in the field. o The native topsoil layer shall be stripped within the house footprint and stockpiled on site. The topsoil shall be re-spread after development. While stockpiled, topsoil shall be covered to prevent erosion. Element #2 Establish Construction Access ; `CF1V -. o The construction access to the site will be the same as the final driveway access. o The driveway shall be stabilized with a pad of crushed rock prior to beginning construction activities. . �x�it y'li1 L(I,jNF? jl' Element #3 Control Flow Rates o A minimum of a 50' vegetative buffer will be maintained down slope of all construction activities. The roof runoff will be dispersed over the site per Volume III, Section 3-15. The driveway runoff will be infiltrated. No streams will be impacted from the runoff. Element#4 Install Sediment Controls o To minimize erosion during construction, wattle will be installed, see plan for location and details. o The natural vegetation buffer will remain down slope of all development. Element#5 Stabilize Soils o To minimize the soil erosion forces of raindrop impact, flowing water and wind erosion during construction, the contractor will follow the exposed and unworked soil schedule set by DOE for all soils on site. From October 1 through April 30, no soils shall remain exposed and unworked for more than 2 days, and from May 1 to September 30, no soils shall remain exposed and unworked for more than 7 days. o All exposed soils caused by construction activities shall be stabilized and hydroseeded or sodded upon completion of the project. Element #6 Protect Slopes o Minimal work is planned for the slope. Native vegetation should be protected and added as necessary to maintain a covered slope. o Provide drainage as necessary to remove groundwater from the top of the slope. Element #7 Protect Drain Inlets o Oak Bay Road shall be kept clean of all sediment and debris at all times. o No inlets are planned for this site. Element #8 Stabilize Channels and Outlets o No channels or outlets exist on site. Stormwater during construction will sheet flow across the site through the temporary BMPs. Element #9 Control Pollutants o All chemicals, liquid products, petroleum products and non-inert wastes present on site shall be covered, contained and protected from vandalism and handled in a manner to minimize contamination of stormwater. o To minimize pollutants generated by heavy equipment and vehicles, all maintenance and repairs shall be conducted using spill prevention measures such as drip pans. Element #10 Control De-watering I .0 i , CE RT�I Tr �o To minimize the potential of needing to de-water, construction during the dry season is recommended. If de-watering is necessary it shall be done in compliance with the 2005 DOE manual. JUL282 %UAW''SBi1JTY BCD • • 2 Element #11 Maintain BMPs (best management practices) • It is the contractors responsibility to maintain the temporary erosion and sediment control measures and to install the permanent erosion and sediment control measures set forth in this report and plan. o After construction is complete, maintenance of permanent erosion and sediment control measures are the owner's responsibility. o All temporary erosion and sediment control measures shall be removed within 30 days after final site stabilization is achieved or as needed if longer. Element #12 Manage The Project o Management of this project can best be conducted in accordance with DOE if the guidelines set forth in this report and plan are followed to ensure that the long term goals of environmental protection and site stability are achieved. Minimum Requirement #3 Source Control of Pollution • As stated in Element #9, to minimize pollutants generated by heavy equipment and vehicles, all maintenance and repairs shall be conducted using spill prevention measures such as drip pans. • Source control of pollutants during construction can be maintained on this job by implementing the temporary erosion and sediment control measures set forth. • Long-term source control of pollution is the responsibility of the property owner and includes all categories of household and yard chemicals and pollutants. Minimum Requirement #4 Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls • The natural drainage route on the site is sheet flow and infiltration to the east and south. • The vegetation portion of the site will continue to sheet flow as it did prior to development. Minimum Requirement #5 On-site Stormwater Management • The roof downspouts will be directed over splash blocks and sheet flow over a minimum of 50' of vegetative surface. • The driveway will flow into infiltration galleries that will cross the driveway at designated locations. • Routine observation and maintenance by the owner is highly recommended and necessary to maintain a functioning drainage system on site. A functioning drainage system should disperse and infiltrate the runoff without causing erosion of the site. IV. CONCLUSIONS Prior to breaking ground the temporary erosion control measures set forth in this report and plan shall be installed on site to minimize erosion and control sediment discharge during construction activities. These measures include a crushed rock access driveway, �D 3 JUL 2 8 2008 rnuuTv nrn and wattle. During construction temporary erosion control measures should be inspected regularly and repaired as necessary. Once the site is developed and stabilized, these BMPs can be removed. Due to the size of the site, the minimal slope of the site and the amount of vegetative cover, the single-family residence roof runoff will be dispersed on site and the driveway runoff will be infiltrated on site. The upper portion of the site's slope is approximately o will meander down the driveway, driveway/o. To minimize the grade of the d , 9 Y Y slope. Due to the length and meandering nature of the driveway a point infiltration of the driveway runoff is not conducive to the site. Instead of a typical point collection system the runoff will drain into infiltration galleries that will intercept the runoff, see plan for location and details. V. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Ken and Aimee McMillen for their proposed construction of a private home. The recommendations in the report apply only to the property that was examined and they are not applicable to other locations. The investigation and recommendations contained in this report are based upon site conditions as they existed at the time of our site inspections. During construction, if subsurface or other conditions are discovered that are significantly different from those described in the report, NTI should be advised at once so that we can review the conditions and reconsider our recommendations, where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites, especially when the topography has been altered years ago. Such unexpected conditions frequently require that additional expenditures be made to attain a properly constructed project. We recommend that a contingency be established in the project budget and schedule to cover unexpected conditions Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice. This warranty is in lieu of all others, either expressed or implied. NTI ENGINEERING & SURVEYING Kate Waddell, P.E. Design Engineer tr _ G:1Gen\Kate\Drainage DOE 20051McMillenldrainage report.doc 7' r uu 4 APPENDIX RECEIvED JUL 2 8 2008 JEFFERSON COUNTS pro WESTERN WASHINGTON HYDROLOGY MODEL V2 PROJECT REPORT Project Name: -de �/y�j I' Site Address: City Report Date : 7/23/2008 Gage Port Angelis Data Start 1948 Data End 1993 (adjusted) Precip Scale: 0.80 PREDEVELOPED LAND USE Basin Basin 1 Flows To Point of Compliance GroundWater: No Land Use Acres TILL FOREST: 2 .19 DEVELOPED LAND USE Basin Basin 1 Flows To : Pond 1 GroundWater: No Land Use Acres TILL PASTURE: 1.811 TILL GRASS: 0.23 IMPERVIOUS: 0.149 Flow Credits: Soil Type Infiltrate Disperse Porous Pavement Outwash 0 100 0 Till 0 0 Saturated : 0 0 RCHRES (POND) INFORMATION Pond Name: Pond 1 Pond Type: Trapezoidal Pond Pond Flows to : Point of Compliance Pond Rain / Evap is not activated. Dimensions Depth: 1.5ft. Bottom Length: 40ft. Bottom Width : 2ft. Side slope 1: 0 To 1 Side slope 2: 0 To 1 Side slope 3: 0 To 1 Side slope 4: 0 To 1 Volume at Riser Head: 0.000 acre-ft. Discharge Structure Riser Height: 2 ft. Riser Diameter: 48 in. Pond Hydraulic Table Stage(ft) Area(acr) Volume(acr-ft) Dschrg(cfs) Infilt(cfs) 0. 000 0 . 002 0 . 000 0.000 0.000 ; ' 0 . 100' 0.002 0 .000 0.000 0.002 0 .200 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.002 0 .300 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.002 0 .400 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.002 0 .500 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.002 0 .600 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.002 0 .700 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.002 0 .800 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.002 0 . 900 0.002 0.002 0.000 0.002 1.000 0.002 0.002 0.000 0.002 1 .100 0.002 0.002 0.000 0.002 1 .200 0.002 0.002 0.000 0. 002 1.300 0.002 0.002 0.000 0. 002 1.400 0.002 0.003 0.000 0. 002 1.500 0.002 0.003 0.000 0. 002 ANALYSIS RESULTS Flow Frequency Return Periods for Predeveloped Return Period Flow(cfs) 2 year 0.007111 5 year 0.024787 10 year 0.045623 25 year 0.084738 50 year 0.124288 100 year 0.17346 Flow Frequency Return Periods for Developed Mitigated Return Period Flow(cfs) 2 year 0.007111 5 year 0.024787 10 year 0.045623 25 year 0.084738 50 year 0.124288 100 year 0.17346 Yearly Peaks for Predeveloped and Developed-Mitigated Year Predeveloped Developed 1949 0.002 0.002 1950 0.016 0.016 1951 0.012 0.012 1952 0.001 0.001 1953 0.003 0.003 1954 0.038 0.038 1955 0.034 0.034 1956 0.006 0.006 1957 0.018 0.018 1958 0.001 0.001 1959 0.021 0.021 1960 0.032 0.032 1961 0.029 0.029 1962 0.001 0.001 1963 0.005 0.005 1964 0.007 0.007 1965 0.003 0.003 1966 0.002 0.002 1967 0.036 0.036 1968 0.006 0.006 1969 0. 001 0.001 1970 0.001 0 . 001 1971 0.049 0 . 049 1972 0.057 0 . 057 1973 0.003 0 . 003 1974 0.002 0 . 002 1975 0.005 0 . 005 1976 0.005 0 . 005 1977 0.Mn n.nnn 1978 • 0.000 0.000 1979 0.000 0.000 1980 0.017 0.017 1981 0.012 0.012 1982 0.033 0.033 1983 0.022 0.022 1984 0.001 0.001 1985 0.031 0.031 1986 0.068 0.068 1987 0.025 0.025 1988 0.006 0.006 1989 0.006 0. 006 1990 0.014 0. 014 1991 0.029 0. 029 1992 0.033 0 .033 1993 0.001 0.001 Ranked Yearly Peaks for Predeveloped and Developed-Mitigated Rank Predeveloped Developed 1 0.0566 0.0566 2 0.0487 0.0487 3 0.0384 0.0384 4 0.0362 0.0362 5 0.0338 0.0338 6 0.0331 0.0331 7 0.0328 0.0328 8 0.0322 0.0322 9 0.0314 0.0314 10 0.0295 0.0295 11 0.0293 0.0293 12 0.0249 0.0249 13 0.0223 0.0223 14 0.0214 0.0214 15 0.0185 0.0185 16 0.0174 0.0174 17 0.0161 0.0161 18 0.0137 0.0137 19 0.0121 0.0121 20 0.0115 0.0115 21 0.0071 0.0071 22 0.0064 0.0064 23 0.0062 0.0062 24 0.0059 0.0059 25 0.0058 0. 0058 26 0.0053 0. 0053 27 0.0053 0 .0053 28 0.0051 0 . 0051 29 0.0031 0 .0031 30 0.0029 0.0029 31 0.0026 0.0026 32 0.0024 0.0024 33 0.0022 0.0022 34 0.0016 0.0016 35 0.0013 0.0013 36 0.0012 0.0012 37 0.0012 0.0012 38 0.0010 0.0010 R E CEI T 39 0.0010 0.0010 Ye `VI4� 40 0.0007 0.0007 41 0.0005 0.0005 42 0.0004 43 0.0004 0.0004 JUL. 2 8 2008 44 0.0003 0.0003 JEffERSON COONIY pCp 1/2 2 year to 50 year Flow(CFS) Predev Final Percentage Pass/Fail 0.0036 0 0 . 0 Pass 0.0048 0 0 . 0 Pass 0.0060 0 0 . 0 Pass ''' 0.0072 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0084 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0097 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0109 0 0 . 0 Pass 0.0121 0 0 . 0 Pass 0. 0133 0 0 .0 Pass 0 . 0145 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0158 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0170 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0182 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0194 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0206 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0218 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0231 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0243 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0255 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0267 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0279 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0292 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0304 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0316 0 0 . 0 Pass 0.0328 0 0 .0 Pass 0. 0340 0 0 .0 Pass 0 . 0353 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0365 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0377 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0389 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0401 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0414 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0426 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0438 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0450 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0462 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0475 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0487 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0499 0 0 . 0 Pass 0.0511 0 0 .0 Pass 0. 0523 0 0 .0 Pass 0. 0536 0 0 .0 Pass 0. 0548 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0560 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0572 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0584 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0597 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0609 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0621 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0633 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0645 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0658 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0670 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0682 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0694 0 0 . 0 Pass 0.0706 0 0 . 0 Pass 0.0718 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0731 0 0 .0 Pass 0 . 0743 0 0 .0 Pass , ;■ ■ 0 . 0755 0 0 .0 Pass 1• . 1 '' 0.0767 0 0 .0 Pass I 0.0779 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0792 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0804 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0816 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0828 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0840 0 0 .0 Pass ti '' 0.0853 0 0 .0 Pass 4c, ,," 0.0865 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0877 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0889 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0901 0 0 . 0 Pass 0.0914 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0926 0 0 .0 Pass n n WI A n n n ID. .-, 0.0950 0 0 .0 Pass 0 . 0962 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0975 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0987 0 0 .0 Pass 0.0999 0 0 .0 Pass 0.1011 0 0 .0 Pass 0.1023 0 0 .0 Pass 0.1036 0 0 .0 Pass 0.1048 0 0 .0 Pass 0.1060 0 0 .0 Pass 0.1072 0 0 .0 Pass 0.1084 0 0 .0 Pass 0.1097 0 0 .0 Pass 0.1109 0 0 .0 Pass 0.1121 0 0 . 0 Pass 0.1133 0 0 .0 Pass 0 . 1145 0 0 .0 Pass 0.1158 0 0 .0 Pass 0.1170 0 0 .0 Pass 0.1182 0 0 .0 Pass 0.1194 0 0 .0 Pass 0.1206 0 0 .0 Pass 0.1218 0 0 .0 Pass 0.1231 0 0 .0 Pass 0.1243 0 0 .0 Pass Water Quality SMP Flow and Volume. On-line facility volume: 0 acre-feet On-line facility target flow: 0 cfs. Adjusted for 15 min: 0 cfs. Off-line facility target flow: 0 cfs. Adjusted for 15 min: 0 cfs. program and accompanying documentation as provided 'as-is' without warranty of any kind. The entire risk regarding the performance and results of this program is assumed by the user. AQUA TERRA Consultants and the Washington State Department of Ecology disclaims all warranties, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to implied warranties of program and accompanying documentation. In no event shall AQUA TERRA Consultants and/or the Washington State Department of Ecology be liable for any damages whatsoever (including without limitation to damages for loss of business profits, loss of business information, business interruption, and the like) arising out of the user of, or inability to use this program even if AQUA TERRA Consultants or the Washington State Department of Ecology has been advised of the possibility of such damages. RECEJIVED JUL 2 8 nos Jtf tiiSON COUNTY OCD • -• • --- YEAR FLOW(*) 100 .1735 --------„-: ,, . , . 10.0 i 1 11 11 1 141 1;i:11 j.11 1 , IL ...... 0 '50 120 l 10 - '. -Ild i'I4' II ' ' ' ' ' II I-- ' 0 5 .0847 ---------------7— :1 a Prede = 10E-1 x Developed ,1,:,: , , , '1.,1 , ,, ,,■ : , g c)0* a .e44.4061,0 ___Ic. ic, ; ---,' -,--,-- ; . ,, ,...... 5 0248 —7 arw. los., , : 1,,,,„ , - -.1 2 .0071 —-- MINI- 1101 I ' 1 10 20 30 4^ 70 00 90 99 Cumulatimkabability Yearly Peaks for Predeveloped Flow Frequency Chart YEAR R091019) , a Predeveloped i x Developed with Facdity -• I d:Il 1 10; 'i: .= 11=== 099 - -- ,■, . 4, 0.06 -- .„„ - . , .;:!; 1 ;;' ' -- , •-; - '• ;'i; 'i ' -= h... ■ - . , = = - :1, --.:. in . . 10E=5 1 1E-4 10E-3 10E-2 10E-1 1 10 190 .0000 --406...a.)?o<Nleoeeet'-x - 7' - 0€4,00ss4Go.eoGoov Percent Exceeding Yearly Peaks for developed W/O Pond Duration Graph • WAR FLO41100 100 1736 - , -: ==,■ P i l',' I : !'= ;, : S ' 50 1249 10 .0456 ' = - n 5 .0248 --- ---(4- -- I') ''f i'', t •I) ? I t , Yearly Peaks for Developed W/Pond ►mu i-08-c.y Cl.Qce ► _ • 4u008 - u,� IS ' 3 a . SPAAD Category and Intake Requirements BETA version Rev. 12/12/2006 Cat A Cat B Cat C Cat D (low risk) Potential Probable Mitigation and site constraints site constraints State review reqd *Special reports are **Special reports **Pre-application optional at intake. If required at intake. required to reports are deemed Could request determine submittal required, the 30 day waiver from intake requirements timeline will not be requirements at pre- met. application. *Need to provide additional information on site plan >200 feet from (1)Shoreline (1)Shoreline r parcel boundary depicted less than property, awl(2) Shorelines 200 feet awayfrom preposat doesn't parcel boundary, or meet standard (2)shoreline on site setbacks and/or Streams proposing mitigation >155 feet from parcel (1)Stream depicted Development bounds off site and less than proposed less than Type 1 . 155'away from . 155'from stream I. parcel boundary, or. (2)on site • >155 fee from parcel (1)Stream depicted Development bounda off site and less than proposed less than Type 2 �' 1.55',away from 155'from stream . parcel boundary,or (2)on site >105 f t from parcel (1)Stream depicted Development i • bounda off site and less than proposed less than Type 3 105'away from 105'from stream parcel boundary, or (2)on site >105 feet from parcel (1)Stream depicted. . Development : boundary off site and less than-. proposed less than Type 4 105'away from 105'from stream parcel boundary, or (2)on site . >55 feet from parcel (1)Stream depicted Development bounder/ off site and less than proposed less than Type 5 55'away from parcel 55'from stream boundary, or(2)on site Fish& . none Depicted on site . Wildlife(other "*Include agency • than Eagle) packet with • application Eagle(contact non .Depicted on site I)CD "*Include agency determine) packet with application . 4 Page4of5 • - ms Cat A Cat B Cat C Cat D (low risk) Potential Probable Mitigation and site constraints ■ site c nits State review reqd *Special reports are **Special reports *"'Pre-application optional at intake. If required at intake. required to reports are deemed. Could request determine submittal required, the 30 day waiver from intake requirements timeline will not be requirements at pre- met. application. *Need to provide additional information on site plan >225 from parcel Wetlands depicted Depicted on site Wetlands boundary '1 off site and less than **Wetland 1 1 225'away*Wetland delineation required N t delineation optional Depict o site Depicted on site Seismic *Geotechnical report _ 1111 r i optional none Low or moderate (1)High landslide `hazard mapped on hazard depicted on site or within 30 feet site or within 100 Landslide from parcel feet of parcel hazard area boundary . .. boundary,or(2) *Geotechnical report verified slides optional **Geotechnical report required • none Intermediate on site ' Unstable,unstable or within 30.feet from recent landslide, parcel boundary unstable old 11,n, Shoreline *Geotechnical report landslide depicted SJY1 Slope Stability optional on site or within 100 0-060 feet of parcel boundary ** Geotechnical report required none Depicted on site Flood *Flood Elevation Certificate optional, . •>30 feet from parcel (1) Depicted off site boun ry and less than 30 feet Erosion (1- away,or(2)on site *Geotechnical report . 01, optional Aquifer Any Recharge. Area . • 4 (2) High Risk SIPZ High Risk SIPZ Seawater stal o t Risk depicted within 200 depicted on site . Intrusion s site feet of parcel *"Hydrogeologic . Protection boundary Assessment Zone ,„7 *Hydrogeologic required 1�; Assessment optional Page5of5 •044.:\A NTI ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, INC. 717 SOUTH PEABODY STREET,PORT ANGELES,WA 98362 Engineers I Land Surveyors r Geologists Construction Inspection J Materials Testing NT, (360)452-8491 1-800-654-5545 FAX 452-8498 E-Mail:info(Onti4u.com www.n64u.com July 7, 2008 Ken & Aimee McMillen 1734 Oak Bay Road Port Hadlock, WA 98339 RE: SITE ADDRESS: 2007 OAK BAY RD MLA #: MLA08-00064 IL 1 6 CASE #: BLD08-00065 JEFFERSON COUR ON Dear Ken & Aimee: This is an addendum to the geotechnical report completed for the subject property by NTI dated July 3, 2007. This addendum was requested by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development in a letter to you dated June 24, 2008 (see attached). Based on the findings, recommendations and limitations of the geotechnical report, it is our opinion that: 1. There have been slides in the vicinity in the past, however, the recommendations of the geotechnical report will mitigate potential impacts to the proposed house. 2. Modifications to the proposal (i.e. foundation and drainage recommendations of the geotechnical report) will mitigate the potential hazards of the landslide hazard area and will not increase surface water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent properties beyond predevelopment conditions. 3. The proposal will not decrease slope stability on adjacent properties. 4. The recommendations of the geotechnical report will mitigate potential impacts to the proposed house under normal geologic conditions. The location of the proposed house, as depicted on the revised site plan (copy enclosed) is the same location that was reviewed during the geotechnical investigation and is acceptable from a geotechnical perspective. If you have any questions regarding this matter or need further assistance, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, O0, -.__/4. C' NTI ENGINEERING & SURVEYING � , 445„ adacm4r_e4 I from;.�,. 6th. / �I i Robert A. Leach, P.E., MBA SS. cisT 7 7 —C Principal Engineer LEXP IRES 12'30/2008 F p 8 a l�`_- Bill Payton, L.E.G. �.a " \ Engineering Geologist 4 h: \\%. Attachments 0 • ' B:\Reports\MCMK0701.18(29-1E).Addendum.doc fro 191 �''7 ,' o William C. Payton Jr._� RECF 11T17' JUL 16 2008 JEFFERSON COUNTY ucu 0 Q , ii 1j1 I I IiI . I 7 1i 1 J k �m lii It 1 1::111._ lt i . 1 • • • gilAit t i q __• " lihil ) II A e Wu : 0 1 4 ri 3 1 11111 - • _l - , n] it • 2 c Illi; P; ll I r. i® _ ,416 2008 _ It JFIRISQQ QQUN[ UCo : , .2,:e°i:. ' '',.3:4114.1[10 '''' ' I Ilii i . I 1 i__ 71w f Ali\An .. F.0 ' a ?7, -' 1 .'... to,-, , : afillilit ix .r hi• ipli a , NTI ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, INC. 717 SOUTH PEABODY STREET,PORT ANGELES,WA 98362 Engineers u,Land Surveyors C Geologists Construction Inspection❑Materials Testing Ni"! (360)452-8491 1-800-654-5545 FAX 452-8498 E-Mail:info([anti4u.com www.nti4u.corn RE CE"TED JUL 1saJ July 7, 2008 Rosa WW1 Ken & Aimee McMillen 1734 Oak Bay Road Port Hadlock, WA 98339 RE: SITE ADDRESS: 2007 OAK BAY RD MLA #: MLA08-00064 CASE #: BLD08-00065 Dear Ken & Aimee: This is an addendum to the geotechnical report completed for the subject property by NTI dated July 3, 2007. This addendum was requested by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development in a letter to you dated June 24, 2008 (see attached). Based on the findings, recommendations and limitations of the geotechnical report, it is our opinion that: 1. There have been slides in the vicinity in the past, however, the recommendations of the geotechnical report will mitigate potential impacts to the proposed house. 2. Modifications to the proposal (i.e. foundation and drainage recommendations of the geotechnical report) will mitigate the potential hazards of the landslide hazard area and will not increase surface water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent properties beyond predevelopment conditions. 3. The proposal will not decrease slope stability on adjacent properties. 4. The recommendations of the geotechnical report will mitigate potential impacts to the proposed house under normal geologic conditions. The location of the proposed house, as depicted on the revised site plan (copy enclosed) is the same location that was reviewed during the geotechnical investigation and is acceptable from a geotechnical perspective. If you have any questions regarding this matter or need further assistance, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, NTI ENGINEERING & SURVEYING �� Rosyy��y 124 - / , I r S 1" • 4t. 13772 p %4,, Robert Engineer each, P.E., MBA SSL S EPrincipal � EXPIRES 12/302008 Bill Payton, L.E.G. ,e° , Engineering Geologist � a Attachments I10 • s � B:\Reports\MCMK0701.18(29-1 E).Addendum.doc e� 91 "4"', -0$g p�° �7/.9 William C. Payton Jr. VED Aut- 16' dE�fERSH. C11 1Y BCD .. . .. ,.., 0 ' ii if ' 1 il Azii t phi ! 1 1 la — f j` ■ m 1 s W 11111 ill W — ..-. - , iti ill I ° : ' bid us 6 I 11'05 . i 11;11 i "liii Mil 111111 li .} WI! II 110 z ' 5' �p cj LLt .�cEliv cc l l it a . is 1 .77---- --;-.7;-; - ; , 1 1 o■I ■ li I I,li t,I,i,;t V..' i . ii , ,„, .\.,,.,.,„....y 1Ju . � ' 54i i� a 1 , , i M;;;; ., f illi ' Iasi 4 g iI i iii pill 1'':;:*!1:::\j:'I ga: , II'''''''N:.% -'...(i''' :;/.1,..'.,>',.;:','...,::.1.1:Ite.* '-,;,- : ,....../' 11 4/1111 li ,ii . --... -:,,,,;',. ,- II 0141.%) :x .. ./ \.--. py filo IAPiiIR ..4\ , . O is is, : ,,i , ,r t; R , oh i1,.... 1 ...„ , w £t , - - - - - him ,. . _ _ -0...0. - - , . Page 1 of 1 Michelle Farfan From: Kathie Anne Sukert Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 11:35 AM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: RE: MLA08-00064 07/24/08 Michelle The parcel no for this is 921073020. There was a BLA that was finalled on 07/3/08. Kenneth and Jeanne McMillen have recorded a NTT regarding the bedroom restriction that EH required. How do I know if the parcel no for their building permit stays the same? If it is different then they will need to re-record the NTT with the correct parcel no on it. Thank you for your help Kathie Anne Sukert Permit Technician Dept of Community Development (360) 379-4450 7/31/2008 • JEFFERSON COUNTY 1-,00N DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT W {� SC 1 $ 621 Sheridan Street � 1°. Port Townsend, WA 98368 Al Scalf, Director June 24, 2008 AIMEE & KEN MCMILLEN 1734 OAK BAY ROAD PORT HADLOCK WA 98339 RE: SITE ADDRESS: 2007 OAK BAY RD MLA#: MLA08-00064 CASE#: BLD08-00065 Dear AIMEE & KEN MCMILLEN: The Department of Community Development is in the process of reviewing your application. The following information is needed to continue review of your project. I have commenced review of the submitted building permit for consistency with the Jefferson County Code(JCC)for critical areas, bulk and dimensional setbacks, stormwater, etc. The geotechnical report submitted with the application, dated July 3, 2007 prepared by NTI did not address the following JCC Section 18.15.275(9) criteria below: JCC 18.15.275(9) (b): Where a geotechnical report is required for a landslide hazard area, the project application shall not be approved unless the geotechnical report certifies all of the following: (i) There is minimal landslide hazard as proven by a lack of evidence of landslide activity in the vicinity in the past; (ii) An analysis of slope stability indicates that the proposal will not be subject to risk of landslide, or the proposal or the landslide hazard area can be modified so that the hazards are eliminated; The proposal will not increase surface water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent properties beyond predevelopment conditions; (iii) The proposal will not decrease slope stability on adjacent properties; and (iv) All newly created building sites will be stable under normal geologic conditions (if applicable). The geotechnical report will need to be amended to address the above criteria. The geotech report should also address the setback from the top of slope (JCC requires a 30 foot landslide hazard area buffer) as depicted on the revised site plan submitted to the Environmental Health Department(copy enclosed). The Stormwater Site Plan has also been reviewed. The Stormwater Plan identifies that the "structure will have roof downspouts and runoff will be diverted via ditch down Yarr Road." It also states that "drain gutter downspouts and storrmwater east of building site to natural swale (approximately 100 feet) that drains east to a two ditch network." The 2005 Department of Ecology Stormwater Manual for Western Washington requires infiltration on site and not routed to road ditches. The county is requesting that an engineered stormwater site plan consistent with the 2005 DOE Manual be prepared for the project due to the site being unstable, the scarp area which is wet, mottled soils, and a curtain drain recommended by the geotech report. The geologist/engineer shall all Bu ildi t R q t eeed q508 °� At SJIe N mVsi&Il n and orlong an ga oF a nnina Dtpaiinfer o(itViM. (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 In addition to the above, the enclosed Hold Harmless Indemnification Covenant Agreement is required to be completed and signed and original submitted to the county for review and signature along with a recording fee of $45 (payable to the Jefferson County Auditor). Once the county approves it, the original will be recorded and a copy returned to you for your records. If you have questions regarding the above, I can be best reached at mfarfan @co.jefferson.wa.us or 360-379-4457. Please submit the above information to the Department of Community Development by September 22,2008. Pursuant to Unified Development Code Section 8.2.3.c and f., if the applicant refuses to submit the additional information or does not request additional time to submit the required information within the ninety (90) calendar day period, the application will be considered abandoned and therefore withdrawn and the applicant shall forfeit the application fee. The Department of Community Development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of an impending expiration. Sincerely, II ,Lit _ .111, A. Department of Community i-ttp-ment Staff c: File li Page 1 of 1 Michelle Farfan From: Linda Atkins Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 11:01 AM To: Michelle Farfan Subject: bId08-65, McMillen is signed off for septic. got the NTT 7/23/08. Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist JCHHS Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 ACways working for a safer and keaCtkier Jefferson County CONF/OENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCN 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from disclosure under state law, including RCN 42.56. 7/25/2008 AFTER RECORDING,RETURN TO: Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Avenue Port Townsend,WA 98368 HOLD HARMLESS INDEMNIFICATION COVENANT Grantors: Aimee &Ken McMillen, husband and wife. Grantee: Jefferson County, a political subdivision and governmental entity within Washington State THIS COVENANT is entered into on this day of 2008, by Grantor(s) Aimee & Ken McMillen, whose mailing address is 1734 Oak Bay Road, Port Hadlock, 98339 (hereinafter "Grantor(s)"). This Covenant shall constitute a burden upon, touch upon and run with the real property described herein. Legal description: Grantor(s) hold legal title to the following described real property located That portion of the North 12 3/4 acres of even width of Government Lot 1, Section 18, Township 29 North, Range 1 East, WM described as follows: Beginning at the meander corner between Sections 7 and 18 of Township 29 North, Range 1 East, W.M.; thence West on the common section line, 554 feet to the northwest corner of Government Lot 1 of said Section 18; thence South 168 feet; thence Easterly to the meander line at a point 225 feet, more or less, south of the point of beginning; and the northerly limits of that property described in Jefferson County Auditor's File Number 114458; thence North along the meander line to the point of beginning; Together with the south 100 feet of Government Lot 4, Section 7, Township 29 North, Range 1 East, W.M. 2007 Oak Bay Road, Port Hadlock, WA 98339 Assessor's Property Tax parcel no. 921073020 Grantor(s) applied for and, upon execution of this agreement, shall receive a building permit as per RCW 19.27, the International Building Code, and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code (Title 18 Jefferson County Code or "JCC") to allow for the construction of a single family residence and associated stormwater facilities and associated septic system and components within a Geological Hazard Area as defined by Chapter 18.15 JCC. THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT A PERMIT OF ANY TYPE. In accordance with and in consideration of allowing the construction of a retaining wall in an Environmentally Sensitive Area, Grantor(s) acknowledge, covenant, and agree as follows: 1. Grantor(s) desire to construct a single family residence with associated stormwater facilities and septic system and components. The property is situated within an area of slow downslope creep and adjacent to a large earth movement landslide hazard area. Grantor(s) agree that they are fully aware of the risks inherent in building within a landslide hazard area. 2. Grantor(s), as their own free and voluntary act, accept and assume all risks of loss or damage arising out of the conditions described herein, and further agree to relieve Grantee, its agencies, divisions, officers, agents, and employees of any liability, damages, claims or other expenses that might arise as a result of or allegedly as the result of this approval of the development and the engineering design of the Grantors proposed development. 3. Grantor(s) agree to and shall hold harmless and indemnify Grantee, its agencies, divisions, officers, agents and employees from and against any and all liability, loss, claims, suits, damages, costs or expenses (including attorney's fees)that may at any time arise, occur or be generated as a result of any reduction in the fair market value of the Grantor(s)' property and/or any damage to personal property or personal injury by reason of the conditions existing now or any time hereafter on or around the Grantor(s)' property, or due to any construction or development or design pursuant to the building permit, septic permit, or any other development permits issued thereunder by Grantee and/or its agencies, divisions, employees, agents, officers or representatives pursuant to any then applicable state statute, regulation, administrative code or County Ordinance. 4. Grantor(s) agree that their representation herein and agreement to hold harmless and indemnify Grantee shall be binding upon the Grantor(s) as well as their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall run with the land described herein and shall touch upon the land described herein. The Grantor(s) further agree that this agreement may be enforced by Grantee in law or equity against the Grantor(s), or their heirs, successors and assigns. 5. Grantee shall record upon the land records maintained and generated by the Auditor of Jefferson County, Washington this Hold Harmless and Indemnification Covenant. 6. This Covenant shall not be revoked or amended without the consent of the Grantee, pursuant to an adopted resolution by the Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners entered during an open public meeting. 7. For the purposes of this Covenant, any phrase or sentence that is conjugated in the singular shall also include the plural and any phrase or sentence that is conjugated in the plural shall also include the singular. THIS COVENANT is in effect as of the day and year first written above. GRANTORS Aimee McMillen Ken McMillen STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. COUNTY OF ) I certify that I know of or have satisfactory evidence that Aimee and Ken McMillen, signed this Hold Harmless and Indemnification Covenant and acknowledged it to be their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. DATED this day of , 20_ Print name: NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, County of , residing at . My commission expires: Approved by the Jefferson County Unified Development Code Administrator: Date: By: Stacie Hoskins, Unified Development Code Administrator Approved as to form: Jefferson County By its Prosecuting Attorney By: C50 01A-1 Date: 6 23 oc For Juelanne Dalzell, County Pr ecuting Attorney MLAO$ -(04 II II 1111111 1111 II III I I 07/23/2000 03:49P Jefferson County Rud JEANNE MCMILLEN COV 43.00 When recorded return to: Name: Jefferson County Public Health 615 Sheridan, Port Townsend WA 98368 DECLARATION OF COVENANT Bed Room Restriction Grantor(s): Kenneth and Jeanne McMillen Grantee(s): Jefferson County NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO Kenneth and Jeanne McMillen , his/her/their successors, heirs and assigns as their interest(s) may appear, and the general public. This restrictive covenant shall bind and restrict the land, the Grantor(s),their heirs, grantees, successors and assigns and shall "run"with the land into perpetuity. DESCRIPTION OF REAL PROPERTY AFFECTED: Lot(s) B Block(s) Div. of Section 7 ,Township 29N ,Range 1E WM ASSESSOR'S TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S): 921073020 Address of Property Oak Bay Rd In consideration of approval by Jefferson County Public Health and/or Community Development of the following permits or applications: BLD08-65 for the real property described above, Grantor(s)hereby covenant and agree as follows: Gaadmin\ONSITE\Templates&Forms\Redroom Covenant 09 27 07 DA.doc Created 9/07 1 of 2 111111 I I I I II I I IIIII 1111 I ll 53,5878 07/23/2009 03:49P Jefferson County Aud JEANNE MCMILLEN COV 43.00 1. 1/We recognize that the septic system serving this residence is sized to accommodate 360 gpd occasional maximum peak use. l/We further recognize that it is the purpose of this covenant to limit the number of bedrooms on this property to 3 . 2. I/We recognize that construction or use of additional rooms as bedrooms beyond said limit may overload the septic system and cause premature failure of the on-site sewage system. 3. I/We hereby agree not to construct,maintain, or suffer to be constructed or maintained upon said land more than one residence having more than 3 bedroom/s. 4. This Declaration of Covenant has been willingly and knowingly signed by the undersigned. 5. This Declaration of Covenant shall not be released or extinguished without the express written approval of Jefferson County Public Health or its successor. Recording. Upon its execution,this Declaration of Covenant shall be recorded with the Jefferson County Auditor. All contracts and deeds or other instruments of conveyance relating to the property or any part thereof shall contain reference to this covenant. Warranty of Authority. The Grantor(s) signing below swear under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the State of Washington that he/she/they are the sole Owners in fee of the real property described above and are authorized to make this Declaration of Covenant and so bind the property. GRANTOR(S) c�-- r� 2—\\Q\ `\ �r-v ,Sifra,...t...--d".„..MIZZ.e.„, Acknowledgment: SUBSC' = _ ! 'ND SWORN to before me thi/1773 day s w _..i , 2008' . . publi d fox's `Fate of Washin_ in, Notary Public residin g eL.4fIf11// Washington. State of Walhln�ton My commission expires ���Q REBECCA niggly MY COMMISSION EXPIPES May19,2010 G:\admin\ONSITE\Templates&Forms\Bedroom Covenant 09 27 07 DA.doc Created 9/07 2 of 2 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT REVIEW FORM // -- Specific JCC Requirements Checklist MLA 0g"(Y/ Application received: //510k) Evaluation of: c� Date: (01�910 Reviewer: J /J Comments/Notes: ()OP J tijA717es1 %,Q ' - 'V 7--.1 CID I Further action required: i1l4 �P./' u t- 126t g cc_ JCC 18.15.275(9) er()4(411 Acrd (a): An applicant submitting a project application shall submit, and have approved, a geotechnical report, as specified in JCC 18.15.385,when the application involves any of the following: (i) The alteration of a landslide hazard area or its buffer. (ii) The creation of a new parcel within a known landslide hazard area. (iii) The construction of a publicly owned facility in a designated seismic hazard area. JCC 18.15.275(9) (b): Where a geotechnical report is required for a landslide hazard area, the project application shall not be approved unless the geotechnical report certifies all of the following: (i) There is minimal landslide hazard as proven by a lack of evident of , landslide activity in the vicinity in the past; Staff Notes: A . ! :. //. a •46'4IL1 ' .! . I ,l4 ' . •�l /■'/n �.G, �. ' ter' A ' trU4-1I (ii) An analysis of slope stability indicates that the proposal will not be subject to risk of landslide, or the proposal or the landslide hazard area can be modified so that ttf hazar s are eliminated; Staff Notes: "S A , , �1 grfi ct Ica -thak a h o-TIA r. st u ff a Q.41-1 •. t. 4 ' t • 1111 11 iu i .' i• I.. . /iii -...i ,.. 1 ♦ q0"e �� �I �. h . .. . [ . / III I . � . i H (iii) The proposal will not increase surface water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent properties beyond predevelopment co ditons; Staff Notes: (iv) The proposal w 1 not decrease slope stabilityron adjarc-eln/t • operties; Staf Notes: &)O{ 4d d bitem fi vn 4t0 and (v) All newly created building sites will be st.ble under normal geolo:'c conditions (if applicable).Staff Notes: AA, . , ,•, . I Ia , I Ala rAIN a I ♦t Jt NTZ itM i l JCC 18.15.275(9) (c): Where a geotechnical report is required for a seismic hazard area, the project application shall not be approved unless the geotechnical report demonstrates that the proposed project will adequately protect the public safety. JCC 18.15.385 Geotechnical Report (1) General. This report shall include a description of the geology of the site, conclusions and recommendations regarding the effect of geologic conditions on the proposal, and opinions and recommendations on the suitability of the site to be developed. (2) Qualifications of the Preparer. Geotechnical reports shall be prepared by a licensed geotechnical engineer, a professional geologist, or a licensed professional engineer knowledgeable in regional geologic conditions with professional experience in landslide, erosion, or seismic hazard evaluation. (3) Information Requirements: (a) A description of the geologic setting of the region, based upon readily available data, including: (i) Site location and topography; (ii) Soils and geologic units underlying the site; and (iii) The location and characteristics of springs within 1,000 feet of the site. (b) An evaluation of the potential impact of the proposal upon existing geological hazards. (c) A discussion and evaluation of the potential impact of the proposal upon existing geological hazards. (d) Recommendations on appropriate protection mechanisms, if necessary, to minimize the risk of erosion or landslide. Notes: m ll,., C m Prgspe., 0 e 3 o. Attie° St Pot Indian Island - Irondale Rd TownsendBay 4 Rd ,Irondale 6� ' Nordland 3rd St i.9� Meade Rd hlarrawstone 116 Port nadlock Island HOPI Po' m I ' ¢� 4,1' y ,4 r5i a `m . • lake Rd w O Robbins Rd Disney 10 P Cn Chimacum ��_ Property PegefSoun� a Location c. OG to 77 Z. W a .0 it O "Pro GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Prepared For Ken & Aimee McMillen July 3, 2007 For the Property Described As Tax #'s 921182006 & 921073020 Section 18, Township 29 North, Range 1 East, W.M. Jefferson County, Washington Prepared by NTI Engineering and Surveying " 717 S. Peabody Street I Port Angeles, Washington 98362 Phone 360-452-8491 Fax 360-452-8498 , Web Site www.nti4u.com E-mail info @nti4u.com i t .: NTI ENGINEERING & SURVEYING 717 SOUTH PEABODY STREET,PORT ANGELES,WA 98362 Engineers Land Surveyors Li Geologists Construction Inspection: Materials Testing (360)452-8491 1-800-654-5545 FAX 452-8496 E-Mail:info(a]nti4u.com NTI - www.nti4u.com July 3, 2007 Ken & Aimee McMillen 1734 Oak Bay Road Port Hadlock, WA 98339 Subject: Geotechnical Report for the Property Described as Tax #'s 921182006 & 921073020, Located in Section 18, T29N, R1 E, W.M., Jefferson County, WA Dear Mr. & Mrs. McMillen: Background At your request, NTI Engineering and Surveying, Inc. (NTI) conducted a geotechnical inspection of the above-mentioned property on June 11, 2007. The purpose of this inspection was to examine the property by visual means for any obvious signs of geologic concern and to make recommendations in regards to the development of the property in accordance with the Jefferson County Critical Areas Ordinance. It is our understanding that you plan to construct a single-family residence on the property. Site Description The subject property is located on Yarr Road off of Oak Bay Road (Figure 1). The property is bounded on the north and south by residential property, on the west by Oak Bay Road, and on the east by Oak Bay (Figure 2). There is an existing house on the property overlooking Oak Bay. It is our understanding that there will be a boundary line adjustment to create an east and west parcel rather than the current north and south parcel arrangement, and that the new house will be built on the west parcel in the approximate location shown on Figure 3. The house site is more than 300' west of the -30' high marine bluff. This report focuses on the west parcel. The property is well vegetated with young to mature trees and brush. The property slopes gently towards the east at approximately 8° (14%). There is what appears to be the edge of a slide scarp on the south side of the property, visible in Figure 3. The topography suggests that this scarp is the left (north) flank of the slide area, which continues southward. Old Oak Bay Road, which is just south of the property, was rerouted, reportedly due to ongoing slide activity. There is evidence of earth movement on the property. The existing house has been damaged, and many of the trees on the property have bowed trunks indicating slope creep. It is believed that the location of the proposed house is outside the area of the larger earth movements. This is indicated by the lack of visible scarps as can be seen on the topographic map (Figure 3). To further explore the area for ground cracks, a 4' deep by 45' long trench was dug through the proposed building site in an east-west direction (Photo 1). The soil was found to be homogeneous and without distinct bedding, which if present, could aid in the detection of past earth displacement. However, no cracks were observed in the trench, which further suggests that the building site is outside the area of the larger earth movements. The site is however believed to be in an area of slow downslope creep as suggested by the bowed trunks of many of the trees in the area. The home site area is relatively dry compared to the scarp area to the south, which is wet and supports water loving plants such as horsetail ferns. The soil in the trench was mottled, which is indicative of water being periodically trapped in the soil or moving through it slowly. The neighbor northeast of the subject property indicated that water does come out of the slope west of his house during the winter. He also stated that he has not experienced any settlement damage to his house or garage. ac, ' 0 m Prospect Ave '34 a ° I .. Arden St Pori 7 Indian Island "a Irondale Rd Townsend Bay ?� s Rd Irondale a 6� Nordland 3rd St i4'9 Meade Rd, t iarmwstone 116 Fort Hadlock island '} �?) R j 1101 Po' O a E 6 w lake Rd �a @`N 0 Robbins Rd Disney P cs i a — Property Puget Sound Chimacurn Location , r a J. 94`a. a. c r00 1a m 1? Figure 1 -Y-97,,, k . 8 3" �r-+dr x vil , ", , 1, '41 i'` " { , 1�', 'n � ' k . � A,i'l -. C ,a ` 4 ' - z V " 4 _iM.a V� a": ' *, s' .,F b -V o .,P _ r ' :a m" M ',',.... ,44'.,'"'''t:,4 < e', ,,,k,'-'70'.,t , „,,t , 4 iiii i a, p�y4t`b$f`Ri...:.. .3& ` ✓ i f 1116; `� i4; ✓ s� ” a t R d1 y •,,47.•X �7 �' 'A * 4 p, a` ; w yy f . 1 F .,�, ' m Subject i�,w g sy + " � 5' �y_ , Pperty 4w , n „,ow— ro �" s y '� ~ 11W^ _ �WKi y,M i4 W.W 5@ M? -y,JS�� r�6 1 , 4 , '�r 'A --om.. it-.. . 3 S I;' wr* T' ; 10' .. 41***1/4. y .w. 'i i'; "M _ Is Figure 2 Mapped Geology of the Site and Vicinity According to the Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington (United States Department of Agriculture, 1975), the property is in an area mapped as Tukey gravelly loam (TuD) and Hoypus gravelly sandy loam (HvC). The Tukey soil is mapped on the west side of the property including the building area, and formed on terraces in glacial till. The soil is very compact below about 24 to 36 inches, which may cause water to be perched above this zone during the wet months. The Hoypus soil is mapped on the east side of the property and formed in glacial outwash on terraces. Generally, the Tukey soil is less permeable than the Hoypus soil. The Washington State Department of Ecology's Coastal Zone Atlas maps the property and vicinity as Vashon lodgement till (Qvt1). This soil is described as consisting of a compact mixture of boulders, cobbles, pebbles, sand, silt and clay, generally overlain by 1-5 feet of ablation till. The Atlas maps the stability of the property vicinity as Stable. The Department of Ecology's "Geology and Ground-Water Resources of Eastern Jefferson County, Washington” maps the property as Lodgement till (Qvt). The till is described as boulders, cobbles and pebbles in a matrix of sand, silt and clay; a compact and unsorted mixture. There is also a band of undifferentiated sedimentary rocks (Ts) mapped along the shoreline in the vicinity of the property. This unit is described as mudstone, siltstone, sandstone, or conglomerate. Visual observations made in the test pits at the site revealed the upper soils to be predominantly sandy silt or silty sand with some gravel and cobbles. The soil is mottled, indicating that water is trapped in the soil or moves through it slowly during the wet season. No stratification of the soil was visible. These observations most closely correlate with the Tukey soil described above. Approximate Location of e '_ ,v House Site � � II G r, i ,d a r 7 4 ., f , 0. 11a:esnm.,4d:R.ci.:.<ri�arrv.`•.r.-iS 'b' ] Figure 3 Conclusions and Recommendations The subject property appears to be adjacent to and within an area of large scale earth movement. The proposed building site however, appears to be outside the area of the larger earth movements. The site is however believed to be in an area of slow 'downslope creep as suggested by the bowed trunks of many of the trees in the area. , It should be anticipated that a house constructed on this site may be subject to more than normal settlement which may show up as cracks, uneven areas, damaged underground utilities, etc. We recommend that this possibility be considered in the design of the house. Possible mitigating measures could include placing a modular home on the site that could be relatively easily and periodically leveled in the event of settlement. Another possibility for a site built home might be using a type of foundation that could withstand more than the normal amounts of settlement (total and differential), such as a raft or waffle type foundation. If this type of foundation is decided upon, we recommend that a Structural Engineer familiar with this type of situation be consulted. t i ',';',',.:41",.; j1"' .A x if '4 ..yy�� [[. � B+ 'i�Mf "r . 11 4 &+It ,. x r r F I�YiI :i /} n•' f u t w L ��, sil4 � •.n F"Iir .SI y..r r .'7�N 1 ��16 YJ ! e . z ,.-4',,,,,4,1.i fi` u ity/ trs tA, i ' d. ' s :..,. x ,`..l' TI>i • ;,"•.'u s 1 qyv, u�rr � s• i ',�p�AA/ x,,,�:x r .l t� �i� 40;1 r f,r ya, � � .a; I 17 'Yb I' ,r.. S�p,p. !f�. a"eCncA +.r� ,f rtl l� q iti r,'tl f J. S �i ' t 4 #1 # F"~ !^ - ' dpf ,,, -• st,if'� , nc,.'d !(tr Jr,. , .�isa+r ,e w'.*F-1 Y ,',t' a 91r'4 s- r +rte,it �.' ♦ .�.. _. yap •�>4 tr r ,' - �''}�y x ,,' .- t.. .1.7c. rbI(: k 011.yI r2. P i ' r .`.t.,./, _ , .J4 ♦' e r'y Lam- a. s Pr+ 4 . �SV4 w ", ^r ",414 r ft1 }v.a • j,. .. j¢(F r 9 .,Y 9f,,�.f / „ 0,,,,11�'»• �,kk C� :.'`,77401''', 11-"I'"'It.( ( ; .. 3n^r_ 1�, . , Ya" q, ::) f ..'t: t i%,s t'' .R 1t° 'r ✓' ,:. .t .G fI4 5 Y'4'4*f`- -il.:,,,t +ro%r P. `.. ?. ;„ ..1,..v w /� �r C F f�_ d tr-,,...':=-:-;',/,.� r 7 �7ry a”' �WrN, ym -q.. w x f� �" !� �[ 'It' ,:''r l., .c+' .tr "4. �+.; ..4:,t- `,..i !7 .,4::".,9:4`t " +1 4,c-,:;,,,,, 4'y'ly r," l"d d i'�" 1 4 AO �,4 .. w w f, , t ♦ a1!yZ-77:44 �F 'J. 1/kr nY?r tf T °P u u ' .�1 )4 � 1i�}FL+ .T -,...,:•- '. a _+ .tr '£ l / ' ' 44 '� 'm...-„,-,,4-',,,,,, . to-.v a p' .'s.. ,•` ,'" s'e- , l " .r , • r , Y • .j •, SJ. 77 f ' �q�. a" ry'� 4' i"' < -sue 'a te Ip 1 y�` -- ' `' �'' 21/4141,,,,L� h. '4 y,'�i c,;��/�'JNi �N� L '� � , �'f d � 1z �vS�,�'.y� �f'�k" l f - i s , s�y^y ht 3�S ,t 7•��Sb:\ sx + 6r'a A i )' a v` l�3"Ss YU . !: � 'S! /w" y C Y � � A ,,YY � SI i ,:.''''t -ii y�naL ;'v 'H ; a '!..N `, '.1., 'y (a�'� , Hj+� �" �. ,d �`a \ l' i +:+ �}Ii`:, . 1, V.�a�.�•=f.-`n am'w F+,L,..y E�•+'i ceµ` P. . 4„ 1r ' 1N ot {r��e kif4 y'a.: r , J" ' =.04t te, Ak — ' , w t�` vP 4 4 �,v " w y, p, ,, q {'el M" r , a . 1 Y4' �IS l 4 <.� R ti ryi p-rr `\ H A { t . �+�i•"M k x t r`tn'x • Y �_� � tr A „Y. rfg ,al h ,. , a ' / t- drpY ."r, . j41,'-,1" _' Y � ■ i',',41.",,..? /J- A T A4 s, r.. ... .- blet i�y i . ' `.i .e. A,/ / . � f'6Gh LL y • t '�65-Ati •!. +4_, . a,t^. ■ n p SL3hL. _f4' '." i.s '',a / •, v Photo 1 The following recommendations should also be considered with regards to development of the subject property: 1. We recommend that footing drains be incorporated in the house design if a site built house is constructed. Footing drains should be kept separate from roof drains. A curtain drain placed uphill of the house may help stabilize the site by removing some of the seasonal groundwater flowing through the site. 2. It will be necessary to maintain ground cover to reduce erosion from surface runoff. Any bare areas that develop should be revegetated. Native deep-rooted vegetation that requires little or no irrigation would be the most beneficial. 3. Heavy irrigation or other activities that would contribute large quantities of water to the soil should be avoided. One cause of slope instability is the presence of excessive groundwater. 4. Runoff from hard surfaces such as roofs, driveways, walkways and patios should be controlled and routed to a drainage control system such that surface water discharge to adjacent properties does not exceed predevelopment conditions. We recommend dispersion or infiltration downhill of the home site area. The drainage control system should comply with all applicable regulations. 5. Silt fences or other sediment control devices may be needed during construction such that sedimentation to adjacent properties does not exceed predevelopment conditions. 6. All drainage control devices should be maintained in good working order and inspected at least once a year. Limitations This report has been prepared exclusively for use by you and your agents in conjunction with the above referenced project. The report has not been prepared for use by others or for other locations. Others may use it only with the expressed written permission of the Engineer. Within the limits of scope, schedule and budget, this report was prepared in general accordance with accepted professional engineering and geological principles and practices in this or similar localities at the time the report was prepared. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. The observations, conclusions and recommendations presented in this report were based on our visual observations of the subject property at the time of our site visit; no laboratory tests were performed. Soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between test holes and/or surface outcrops. If there is a substantial lapse of time, conditions at the site have changed or appear different than those described in this report, we should be contacted and retained to evaluate the changed conditions and make modifications to our report if necessary. 0,1A. (F 4 0 Sincerely, - of was c NTI ENGINEERING & SURVEYING f/. /I( \•) A 3772 �O, a� 7 E CSI E� OF("SSioNA I 04" 7 Robert A. Leach, P.E., MBA EXPIRES 12/301200B Principal Engineer Qo J J t' y 'I , fnNy� Bill Payton, L.E.G. �_; =t}'h'` ,- ` L, Engineering Geologist �' � ?._ f,\o*79 G:\Gen\Bill\Reports\MCMK0701.18(29-1 E).bluff stability.Oak Bay Rd.doc �'p's6rf9e 60�p' ,. �Wllliam C. Payton Jr j • �.�,SO.N c0 R JEFFERSON COUNTY • FED 15 zoos 4 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ,S 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend •Washington 98368 Y o0 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax , "SIN http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ STORMWATER SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL TEMPLATE MLA# (3 8 -(04 PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: f�A l' ►1 ! K_-e_..> 'V 1 cititt 11a i( J Please answer all of the following questions to the best of your ability. Where the question calls for depiction on a site map, the applicant may choose to either incorporate the elements into the general plot plan for the Master Land Use Application or to submit a separate stormwater site plan map. Project Overview 1. Describe the proposed developed conditions of the site. Indicate position and relative size of proposed improvements on the site map. f y �..- ZouN7i.;C: C3',-. ND•ZM ' CC.J1, Jor 24:7.s:-00v r,,1-1 per. ass W=4-4 Gr;j, o-4 162 "i T. ; at1'L raft v (2-04,4- fAi.i 1�,,i OA t_ Sft y , i t2_ t7C'3 w7.i.4... Re- c.I eYNA-1,i� 4u4-3-sr<caIt, bf ccNG vod 49 P 04-1-44 ✓ 20, 30 x 40 Tv. 51 .? HOrlt- Bo,/+, • Existing Conditions Summary 2. Describe the existing topography. Indicate contours on the site map. ?' . -= -.—._----w, - — _, no Y-cvt-'� slop .."--& -Pp�✓ .t> �2... Eer3-1.---' A'r Qs2 . V)`I 6/4 7a 0 N W rift-7- n_ '- \.f w 3�= m= F o e 0-} pc S i rt— coc 1- Se'-,m c� Ste}- , 3. Describe the existing vegetation. Iridicate native vegetation areas on the site map. -T7-1 r (Do,T.--- `t F.1 t„✓eeA_ 0 ran..'rr1-c i c r.., -Tyi Yo•--n To r►, .t_. 1-a-6F=I Ar4C1 e,cZA.r S l- < -FP IS f cn,t'L_ i n a1 corlrh9 'a n.--id/ 3 F�»rV ih.4ic.M ue S,"tom- �00c 4. Describe the existing soils. Indicate soil type on the site map. ._.1 F i7-S i C)='T. . CZ- v 'c1 s t.- �-S ill o-r--n t= v.. ---'%--1-1 ry 0 s,-rz, - ,R ..o,...1 • t Z.i4.-.Z Le So:.1 5. Describe the existing site hydrology(i.e., drainage; behavior of water on the site—above,below, and on the ground). Indicate existing stormwater drainage to and from the site on the site map. Depict separate drainage basins on the site map, if applicable,and indicate acreage of each. .,o..r•( 20n4-. S• e. ptza,(,¢-t-24- nirl, rv,c coi-J 'r- n2 OnA•slrt3e, .S4-11- r-rf-- [,,,) }i-b-t- t. k 4.ir. N O 2>,A. -1-.r.-e..% Papi, .p e_ d 2 Poor-) On,Fy/'2er .Sax, p,-I , S+-W,c. f-1 COc 1 pIl'LT So.. o,'J 3i L tl l� . r 1 - ,r A .-1E.-._ 1 10 r(1 c�c.! tt -Wi iC, l ' G Lo.r 11,-1 R -bra z u 6. Describe any excess levels of noise generated by the proposed use or activity: CO Mr 10%..1 (..0-+ k`'ti.-%.J1.. .a� N0-'\ 1=-----� AS R'2- c0-4-1 rf1.--,,-T'.so- -f • N cry G LFv i.-c.-> vi -tom t3 e (2-e-0.1.4-e-0 1t3 tho. , t�-- f l 6.,3)e P l I (Zc.S c stormwater site plan template-rev.10/12003 5 7. Describe significant geographic features and critical areas (i.e., environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands, streams steep slopes,etc.) on the site. Indicate location on the site map. Ciz..i c>�-1 Mme'.- _� -�. , I &. 1133 ( � � �Cli1L] � hllJ j�' � P.,iJ 6,1 p1[3..r CfJ OA-1L 1-24i-31- c'-‘ P.2av c,??-/ w G z�R rC� 8. Describe the general vicinity of the site, including adjacent land uses and structures, utilities, roads,and sensitive/critical areas (streams,wetlands,lakes,steep slopes,etc.). 5- t%. Cae -uM n fl e°va-.j i OA Iz f -( CR J v ;3 . c.2v aa2 711 t x :� ... h U .LE 0-2, �.-}� P D c .� J� �:: ;7 f}i (� .t.1 t-rz 1C.� `�] . —) f () , A 1 O .�.K.r.O t c -cirr"1 0.; :.v {e_ 70 71'iG N°ILf1'1 J Permanent Stormwater Control Plan This portion of the Stormwater Site Plan consists of the selection and installation.of the appropriate stormwater control BMPs and facilities to remain in place after construction of the project is completed. "Medium" size projects are required to have the totals calculated of all impervious surfaces, pollution-generating impervious surfaces, and pollution-generating pervious surfaces to verify that the thresholds for treatment facilities and flow control facilities are not exceeded. g. Describe the developed site hydrology, as proposed. Indicate whether stormwater will be fully dispersed (i.e., per BMP T5.30 in the Manual) or, if not,what types of stormwater flow control will be utilized for the site or specific threshold discharge areas • within the site. Locate these facilities on the site plan and differentiate proposed facilities from existing facilities. J �v � F z,v_1 -f o.,A v.- 1 Gt1-1). e_T1 Q /o ,-LV; my )DO v r- f tD na , p L ( 0.. - L. V2 ( of-c o Olt Yi I ccLF intvc tit a cJ;zT-A,-'r.t O RAJ 2&S s-sQ rl,w � UC. o - tl a-rn 10. If the project requires the use of stormwater treatment facilities,describe the types of stormwater treatment facilities proposed for use on the site. Locate these facilities on the site plan and differentiate proposed facilities from existing facilities. [This is normally for'large"projects or projects that involve the potential for dispersion of contaminants.] N J TV-ter -\R,r\-- =rrc.L.1� t`ry S?J0 1 rs..\ dh l A l7ry,,�a� 11. Describe the performance goals and standards applicable to the project. - _ - -TC . r- V — at OP ".--71-N. 12. Describe the flow control system. ?Z✓.+,.i ,,,,�5,� D.Nt-jrz.--r\-.c s A 0i---t'C.d tt--," +rJ y�cuz 2ors0 . #( G^fllty i.. Orkr-13-K.t ,O�4L1 ,: >' a .c C_ Th2-'sj 4s U ! 0 r W,'tW4-2, r n cfi.9.J D fZ �fC " LC. (IA e..., . 5 4r4 ML.. Q L co sto n-water site plan template—rev.10.'12003 6 • • ID13. Describe the water quality system. Z. In S. d2 crv,tarrn A l P . A O. NE-iW S2'IC. heJi T %E. ci :M. Arv( C- .j 2R• .( i i.t t ?jj l iN1 f l �(L3 r ' ?} �TS�CYVI rri7�Cj� in at l(�f� 3 L � � 415 q.c> Qfv4 i 6-3 t S tc7 qw v1 pc< t3(, 111 - Yt.O ��J ti (.0 ) m-CJ I tJ 14. Describe the conveyance system analysis and design. r� r'- • ` IC1 Dt1,1na- J �'rC2 Rr�r.f >aDv . N13 SrEA vV!�.-r�''� �11 g.:r� S. ;-c`� r�r?rt � 5 r r/}4 _ / (2Ct t}k ADO'O' l D{?✓f -w �. \--u1 ►VI�- 3��f n r.i L 'r' rat� S.ram 04- trN - -4:TJ (2-0 -NI rtakt/ims0, 10 h Q sir'j% l'W 1'21-I 15. Describe the source of fill material,physical characteristics of fill material,and deposition of excess material. S� R t t Sim i Nr0 -F7 1 t 1��4>� l ✓ L 16. Proposed methods of placement and compaction consistent with the applicable standards on Appendix Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. WE_ 1rvt 4 ! v a - l�l r c,s� 1 ti / # rh nv S 4- 36"2-- 0� �^u.01 cort �c�n�) w t't�Pcv'Y e^► t1_,r '�', . o.,.nq;rs.N ;-)17 � . 17. Describe the proposed surfacing material. � 2 J�S../A Q i /�t �'a r{� 1'l: I � 1 Jt-c<- t i vt CAD nfc ll'1=-i--7:1. v.-vO gv7. r 1.1-1". J 18. Describe methods for restoration of the site. A c.,w-.SS E T -C . -ivcC. {Z£ 7 O1rt ,,c) �t,s,/ '✓ .cc) A .D 7p C",J:a2 lr ra,"n.i -,L . 4( (� i.P0.4-Y- /1-06 %`" f),2'c3Nt.1/4f.-iS• w ri•-' w3'1' ) { a-� • Os-) C A 13 0 ` S ) F0-0,,,r L r 19. An Operation and Maintenance Manual is required for each flow control and treatment facility. [This is normally required for "large"projects only and only those for which facilities are required to control flow or treat runoff.] If included,list the Manuals here. 20. List here and include any special reports or studies conducted to prepare the Stormwater Site Plan. k f AJ AAt,' A Ir w---r (Lr°1(a-9-r'2.`r D E- k 21. List other necessary permits and approvals as required by other regulatory agencies. If those permits or approvals include conditions that affect the drainage plan or contain more restrictive drainage-related requirements,describe those conditions or restrictions here. s E 1-\ h` y1 +O Ot-� + ,.r mi l/ • stormwater site plan template-rev.10/12003 7 • CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN(SWPPP) ti The Construction SWPPP addresses sediment and erosion control during construction. The BMPs indicated by the applicant in the template that follows must be installed on the ground during all construction phases of the project. The proponent is responsible for preventing sediment and erosion impacts to environmentally sensitive areas and off-site areas. Consult the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet for guidance, particularly with rural residential development. SECTION I-CONSTRUCTION SWPPP NARRATIVE 1. Construction Stormwater Pollution Plan Elements. Describe how each of the Construction SWPPP elements has been or will"be addressed. Identify the type and location of BMPs used to satisfy the required element. If an element is not applicable to the proposal,justify in writing. Descriptions of the 12 Elements are found at section 2.5.2 of the Manual(beginning on page 2-15). 12 Required Elements-Construction SWPPP 1. Mark Clearing limits. v.r-ct_ QC. Tmc-e tit AJT Sn'1 t yr n+-6"( ( .S 4E la . 1 u -;�f rvft Pc Mv(A1 +olkE 3 lac 1-rcvf osS bl� -‘o z we 1=r1- (Z.»v o,j- 3 C20 J ,rte, el- :�.P, bAc./ i-x. Oi S)011v{� r�l _ C 10% PAIE-0F43. 2. Establish Construction Access. CcYv,.;c- , vr, 3 orvc.c_ ati+Lvr-c 6 1�.2s k 4 0 n I n On tIoel 20, (7_007) TO S.. i : vAiSc7} 11- c v, r rd2. . v c.lC. Y")A-c41, /{r J S D c.a)-,r 4 rc Dst:.n u.r A..' 4 ,r.i; e-t, pa c., Saco &.r 3. Control Flow Rates. • C � o Ar, ONO i T 5 0` 0 P err-r- ttoA,(2) 4r -z4.0-7 a-t. Q, -i (le_ PI-.4 s 0-Q a rite.^-, O A ivx c- fie, OJtT tt"J otr.=c� th Co(Y;31)-•"\ . at r ✓,..r aertir.D■J >* • 4. Install Sediment-Controls. r� WE. hri(,L ' )• + c j L Z� /-QA U- G &'vc 4 nil .^?U-4 tlaE ?.nvir' elcu-2 otl C_a.,a�'LI�, -1 Pv-trn.� . Pmrvi,r.(�t 0,,a Drc`( rio�ct.S v 5. Stabilize Soils. �=c3:+vj.,-r jaw f30(60 r1+A A" fQ4 1ci wG v✓Pe-c- s- 1; ?c .Sow r�� ti"1v I c is car), o 7s,Frz. C &. 5 . vicei r`10",rr1 Dcr ST 't( Spr1- )0`A t r Sho,ilip MS'r be. A pczoble-r►_ 6. Protect Slopes. stop€ if. -c-c— c 1-P44 1N-1,4•-► . - ( . 'T3 t. - Vy Q E 0 J J b P t-cAis -+. Arc, Pop-. KcAto".1 7. Protect Drain Inlets. S i-o cu.') w- cc 2 R.✓i�v A IN i? A • FFR 15 2003 stormwater site plan template—rev.10/1/2009 8 • • 12 Required Elements-Construction SWPPP(continued) 8. Stabilize Channels and Outlets. c LL. w �� p)ftc Vs..) 1 r1U,� 1\1 > a , w Ey v' O r � n S�-r�cc-4-. w Q-oc.(C 9. Control Pollutants. 01-: ry D s � w i C loe e; , A- Sam Coc,,y-: .4.J, U. u% (`1j0rs"..rNar- jL4 - w-.3 L +,— •.t4L Q� KIT 10 A D't ...(rh\j. i c p 11,-13\ . co.3 tt�=i A 0'inc-( (Ad 10. Control De-Watering(the act of pumping groundwater or stormwater away from an active construction site). AF,A C ; ' WP c rL r7.lGdiv v1 O AI- TlG A-vt-,'\I GOti4Tc\Jc7r-.ON 1.7.}-1.--` w 2ro•rn AND tae=hilCZ(,N A -QO..t1-�'t`t' AS io G tO F" D 1Pct-, C SDI 4 J p.� TO VIAL,r t -'c o-& 11. Maintain Best Management Practices(BMPs). F1e1%r rt be_ t_t,,.t M-ot)QCS +v�� , / F3'2- (o,SVV-v u.t ce- cd ti-t p d eo -6\t, v.j (Le w �-v-.1 3 00,4 , 12. Manage the Pro' . T 0j - vv .- Sae, Pri • Z R.rv-t"ca,fY Oov, P Ar.C=. - rlvt 3 ✓ho,v 2. Adjacent Areas. a. Description of the adjacent areas that may be affected by site disturbance (e.g., streams, lakes, wetlands, residential areas,roads). S C1-eAr- I � �l w a T"t r4�p S► 6 12.4,4 7mJ +, DPet-, VV-1 1oAc. t. L ' c c-cS ?O ry b. Description of the downstream drainage path leading from the site to the receiving body of water(minimum distance of 400 yards). Dint"4 t,TcLe.fitri W"c-- fa. tiJzw Q 21 0 " -1� T:► A Dp1`it"i 1 1"rAt LA-Tcn-ert. vi'p'f;7 C.. l/41-j). Q or a Fsn_ A l-'i'2.3JC . j f M 3. Environmentally Sensitive Areas. a. Description of environmentally sensitive areas that are on or adjacent to the site. 0A1 CLAY 7 O PT To Eeri i UNrdu, n..i P, A .c_ > i.:o PT- NZ S 1-4E ar, v in a. r E 1 F "'IF stormwater site pan template-rev.tat 2003 9 • b. Description of special requirements for working in or near environmentally sensitive areas. co,...)a v c'C:g�1 �v �c i Q.? Gyl�. C;-) woo 4- .1-c n"P loo -Ea t"1 Gi4- , fi R., : 1n, � � (3F 00-4F- 9fv 4. Erosion Problem Areas. Description of potential erosion problems on site in the context of the characteristics of the on-site soils(e.g.,erodibility,settleabiiity,permeability,depth,texture,soil structure). QPc( t1''r. rA``� orn T i Z S 1 t Olt-) C.-,'CL •10 ri.ti,! ifvpt.- (2---r2-04 �Z.i;) .- i' J Ex-uk "-k. e, e(-49�I 5. Construction Phasing. a. Construction sequence L./k�U�\J%237v 17 C2•�a-- A'( 3“," - -a,• t�.�-S j {�j✓yt.�.ts:9J ,��}-E P.r-(s, .T9-1(;20 c ou Lfiz c T"€ eo . -0-Al-t � b. Construction phasing (if proposed) ,- �' �� 3q rn E Pw r113 I� . c�'1 , Ptti; w��it 1 .r-N-1 1 64W;A 6. Construction Schedule. Wet season is October 1 through April 30(page 2-21 of the Manual). Provide a proposed construction schedule. • t-R vOi`�i(}M1 t { e^l/j(L ✓r '1`N.�J r1LL r1�Farn CL_j ,L f 11't ti II• Wet Season Construction Activities. a. Proposed wet season construction activities. �A cl'+A t1-v.v-h , Fat/ 'h J 1N dc?._ b. Proposed wet season construction activities for environmentally sensitive areas. Cr.? 7. FinancialOwnership Responsibilities. a. Identify the property owner responsible for the initiation of bonds and/or other financial securities. K6..1 6 1 67 41 rc c b. Describe bonds and/or other evidence of financial responsibility for liability associated with erosion and sedimentation impacts. I A O A& 'C'i "r: c3Y . 1.a,,"'1 8. Engineering Calculations. Provide Design Calculations on a separate sheet for the following,if applicable. a. Sediment Ponds/Traps. b. Diversions. c. Waterways. e} d. Runoff/Stormwater Detention Calculations / stc,rmweter site plan tenplete—rev.10/12003 10 • SECTION II—EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN Sediment and erosion control measures may be depicted on the master land use application plot plan, a stormwater site plan,and/or a separate Construction SWPPP site plan. This is a checklist to ensure that the following are depicted on a site plan: 1. General. a. Vicinity Map b. Jefferson County Approval Block c. Erosion and Sediment Control Notes 2. Site Plan. a. Legal description of subject property. b. North arrow. c. Indicate boundaries of existing vegetation(e.g.,tree lines,pasture areas,etc.). d. Identify and label areas of potential erosion problems. e. Identify FEMA base flood boundaries and Shoreline Management boundaries(if applicable). f. Show existing and proposed contours. g. Indicate drainage basins and direction of flow for individual drainage areas. h. Label final grade contours and identify developed condition drainage basins. i. Delineate areas that are to be cleared and graded. j. Show all cut and fill slopes indicating top and bottom of slope catch lines. 3. Conveyance Systems. a. Designate locations for swales,interceptor trenches,or ditches. b. Show all temporary and permanent drainage pipes,ditches,or cut-off trenches required for erosion&sediment control. c. Provide minimum slope and cover for all temporary pipes or call out pipe inverts. d. Shows grades,dimensions, and direction of flow in all ditches,swales,culverts and pipes. e. Provide details for bypassing off-site runoff around disturbed areas. • f. Indicate locations and outlets of any dewatering systems. 4. Location of Detention Best Management Practices(BMPs). Identify location of detention BMPs. 5. Erosion and Sediment Control Facilities. a. Show the locations of sediment trap(s),pond(s),pipes and structures. b. Dimension pond berm widths and inside and outside pond slopes. c. Indicate the trap/pond storage required and the depth,length,and width dimensions. d. Provide typical section views through pond and outlet structure. e. Provide typical details of gravel cone and standpipe,and/or other filtering devices. f. Detail stabilization techniques for outlet/inlet. g. Detail controVrestrictor device location and details. h. Specify mulch and/or recommended cover of berms and slopes. i. Provide rock specifications and detail for rock check dam(s),if applicable. j. Specify spacing for rock check dams as required. k. Provide front and side sections of typical rock check dams. I. Indicate the locations and provide details and specifications for silt fabric. m. Locate the construction entrance and provide a detail. 6. Detailed Drawings. Any structural practices used that are not referenced in the Ecology Manual should be explained and illustrated with detailed drawings. 7. Other Pollutant BMPs. Indicate on the site plan the locations of BMPs to be used for the control of pollutants other than sediment(e.g.,concrete wash water). 8. Monitoring Locations. Indicate on the site plan the water quality sampling locations to be used for monitoring water quality on the construction site. Sampling stations should be located upstream and downstream of the project site. • slormwater site plan template—rev.10/1/2003 11 Stormwater Site Plan Changes If the designer wishes to make changes or revisions to the originally approved Stormwater Site Plan,the proposed revisions shall be submitted to DCD prior to construction. The submittal shall include substitute pages that include all proposed changes, revised drawings showing any structural changes,and any other supporting information that explains and supports the reason for the change. Final Corrected Plan Submittal If the project included construction of conveyance systems,treatment facilities,flow control facilities, or structural source control BMPs (not standard on-site stormwater management BMPs),the applicant shall submit a final corrected plan ("as-builts°)when the project is completed. These should be engineering drawings (stamped by a licensed civil engineer) that accurately represent the project as constructed. APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Construction SWPPP worksheet, I as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. M1 AILIU u i , W (DATE) (UVJ b' NER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) THIS SPACE MAY BE USED FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES,IF NEEDED: • • stormwater site plan terrplate—rev.10/1 n2003 12 r . e, uog-C06-- APN: q i I 6/3 . O .6 'Yu-1O8 - 1 140`I I Layers None Visible Active Label Map not punted Map printed r r Road System pi `, —'Leave on for all or most maps ✓ c Assessor Maps-H —w ✓ r Parcels-H r -t/_ r r Lots ✓ r- printed with Lidar Hillshade,no parcel Contours label Property Transactions-H ✓ c ✓ r Parcel Tags-H �� r r 20 r0 Sho r �;; 2000 Shore Photos-H �_ X I A4VC JOAkir- r r 1994-97 Shore Photos-H ✓ r Shorelines-Arcs 111111=IMMI • 5ALA1RAAA r r Shorelines-Polygons r ' DNR Streams Bodies �� ("; r DNR Water Bodies r r Permit Categories TEST =MI r r LFA-Fish / r r Soils-H NM ✓ no parcel label ✓ r: soils n r Marbled Murrelets If mapped, change to i tool and Heritage Points write description on map or here r r Spotted Owls r c Bald Eagle Nests ✓ r Bald Eagle Buffers ��= ✓ r; Priority Habitats and Species 8/06 ✓ r Wetlands r r Rare Plants-Ecosystems r c Seismic Hazard r r Landslide Hazard ✓ r FEMA FIRMS .�_ r r Erosion Hazard MOM ✓ r} Critical Aquifer Recharge MEM Areas ✓ r Wells-Chloride M'/,—no parcel label ✓ r Mineral Lands w_w no parcel la el ✓ C SIPZ ✓ r Shoreline Slope Stability r r Airport Overlays MIMI r t County Zoning r r County Zoning-UGA r€ LIDAR Hillshade —IIIWABI Done with contours above ✓ USGS Topos ✓ 2005 Aerial Photos Will no parcel label ✓ 2000 Aerial Photos 1994 Aerial Photos r r PT Photo ✓ r Geoco�d-e Index 3 LL V 0 WuziA 20-YLk. / R $ g > >§ ioo2sg z JV a gsa m d- rn W a � W 0 o (f) (n I— Cr (31 - 1156 - L 1/I 3S) 0 Q fv Z 0 V gu Y i_5 I t 8 1 0_ `. 1§w l b r36 1 Q Ie°i N / _ I ., CC Li In / I; u I /6 is 1 1, on"i / u / N /E i ,.., 1 i , 8 4./ R/ _ lol n 1 Al, 1 W " I 1 ° ,Y °1 'Q © a Sjf y _a R a $r I�A 1 W ';a6i Z h S' O 3 7w . �_ ..;.% m 5' 6- l R�- a eoo -I @ ( .'•i.6_ � 3p CIm ° \ i I a "a4 i.a 5?:P. • 3dey \ z QI:y4F a.._,R, Alillill NO N I N, HILLER DRIVE S o o, " 0 � °P� �d�d = thy ' g a,. erlol 'ys .°n o ti 8' .fib i°n z E a3 l'', 41' o a jitter ''161 b Ica ��0 ,°,�d 0 VOW RW pia g" 0 31,°„ d �Sro ° R AA b w ry $ tl mc°]� z °{ �_OO gg 83143 a 53e £ 101 1,A00 1� 4 .1.01 1,A00 - - - - - 3Jtld5 00. N3d0 m66, 5 (MI - N6Z - Z 4/1 3S) oG OW n _ 8 S 8 ■ 3 o C_ rc a — >'i R g 5 . . . w — m ar ; o>$ , _$88 3ad:x9 :B wad Wo°w W _ a a ' v05 4• a.£e.fr ¢mow �i i _ Z "- °ems i O �"�°t zoa F -Ya iy34 �< d zjm o — ,`k '946'a0 "" € • gg 3 ' ao>uw — 7 YgnF gj iS 'O k o d” fi g N 41°w 8_ g ° g.n :€o�� d�ffi5�g g arco 0 g Map Output Page 1 of 1 921073020 MLA08-64 McMillen 921073007 '',' t 921073013� 92'n+g;,'I I - 921073025 \. y Ir {`+ 421073011'. 'g210730,, 9210730:H \ + ��i 921ono%t 92'0:: '5 � 921073012 92tc.+., 'i -- 921073005 I I _ Legend 921073014 Selected Features Road System Parcels-M 92107 Millk Boundaries •r .a+. 1 0140 J b b 921182003 x 9211820' A921182005 921182"' 1f® FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed Feb 20 15:49:59 2008 http://g isserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV... 2/20/2008 Map Output Page 1 of 1 921073020 MLA08-64 McMillen t ' — ., I } 1 Legend Selected Features '' '+ 1 .eA'j Road system -'- ParGets-H N.. ( Contours � N j'f i \ ‘56 Fore CThr✓isaf it \ Boundaries --- V E _ . . ° 1 I , /). ' , ,7-Of cow All n • FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- ' Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed Feb 20 15:50:47 2008 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esri map.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV... 2/20/2008 Map Output Page 1 of 1 921073020 MLA08-64 McMillen 921073037 \y 921073013 II 9210731 sit' I 921073025 ., `-:, '.7. - '. 12'.73O1' 2''0730" �,� 1 � 921073026 yt f € 92107 '_ r • 921073012 921073012 4 CI INEffes,#) Legend 5. ._,., ,.. Selected Features y Road System Parcels-H .. ::.., :.._ Parcel Tags-H 11 t \ t ® No Specs Rm:r1 ElSimms Peas Boundaries �'r� n _e`ienm Cart,' 931182003 1, f i J 011er Cases ist"G[Cii1> 'ce2'z fi 33-t FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed Feb 20 15:51:14 2008 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV... 2/20/2008 Map Output Page 1 of 1 921073020 MLA08-64 McMillen 921073007 92107301 OPT) "� 921073025 }l} 1.10, ii 921073011+ 921073071` ,li 21073028 '�F 02107301611921073016 921073012 921073012 Legend 921073005 921073014- Selected Features Road System t pi. __ Parcels-H 921073020. . Permits-H Boundaries 921182006 I •'rev,C4" OPHr n T � 5 \k ....-Irrrif. 921182005 `:'....182012 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed Feb 20 15:51:27 2008 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV... 2/20/2008 Map Output Page 1 of 1 921073020 MLA08-64 McMillen ti; V ;i. 921073007 �\ 921073013 4` 921073010 f 921073025 \ \ 4 ,it --. `� 92107301' 1 .210730" 921073026 1 I. ,. �_ 19210.rvr'cR 9210+__'+ INEWerki 921073012 22' ;=._'1 Legend 921073005 n Selected Features 921073014 �a / Road System . Parcels-H -- - ��II �� 0 2000 Shore Photos-H i Boundaries ..2.. ,,. TI .,dlet�n ca,r,, c II x n ,u.... < I I CThe'Carats 921182003 '1 3 III 921182012 ti , ["6,C C -82l %I 4e1:_c`e'toi Carr.Ocrag Sr':ici.' IS GMEMEMENEMMEMBEI 3.11 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed Feb 20 15:52:31 2008 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV... 2/20/2008 Map Output Page 1 of 1 921073020 MLA08-64 McMillen t ,\ j 1 921073007 t 921073013 9270730•3 ` ' r 1:.4cr3025 4 Iy _.. 92107301' '.240730. 1 /�1 f ll G .. l�N•927073026 _J, 921073016%92'':.'=" 921073012 92'014 Legend v2. Road System 921073005 III L._.._... Paresis-H 921073014 Stioreenes-Acs mof eaecra[y75ubuten wf CGm:rarra hire 9210)3020 7- ur �.. _._.�..__.. 1 summon Q 921182006 l" t qA/ cQ�azr 921182003 O /d ea'SbJ°0a' /40, Caner i 921/82012 Boundaries n . =a,C, . t n .., 921182005 421182012\ n osw-Carpel AID Ra.:ded by Ae6ean Carer Cenral Senwoep GtS .:∎-3.. FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed Feb 20 15:52:45 2008 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV... 2/20/2008 Map Output Page 1 of 1 921073020 MLA08-64 McMillen t 9210 13007 4� 921073073 I 9210730'_i I iii 9'2'013 ,025 tit .' S 'II 921073011"' 92107301' 1 921073026 4 1 i` _ + ...,``_ :' 1441 92 10 73 01 6 92107301-. 921073012 92107301 Itl Legend 921073014 'rw 921073005 `• n Selected Features I ./ Road System r. Paroets-H 921073020 L_. DNR Water Bodies I, . r G 921182006 III 4 ■ S L7 p n Ya Desgn ' m 921182033 A Boundaries . 10.5.m Corry E A str ' ::"9211ac• e 7 Cmm Canes 921182005 921182U'i o isse=soss j_ FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed Feb 20 15:53:21 2008 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&CI ientV... 2/20/2008 Map Output Page 1 of 1 921073020 MLA08-64 McMillen t I • \41' / . -,,- 1 Lk i, 3 , . , 1)\___ _ j J Legend - ---- 0 Selected Features 1 ,,,i Road System _. Parcels-H it y ___l Sods-H Boundaries r.,: 5 cwt Carty x 7 .v.- � _�_ i Carder A 5 \ 0■ i Cm0 \,,r.\\\ \ 1I\ ■ 5 :113:.i'u:au:1:_t^cr:s i Cost,Cris Sc":c'e CIS ,r 1_:.r FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed Feb 20 15:53:46 2008 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&CI ientV... 2/20/2008 Map Output Page 1 of 1 921073020 MLA08-64 McMillen ''.921073013 I 921073007 t, 1 921073013 21073025 14 \� *II � 1 .-.—- y 921073011.. 921073011. 921073026 1 I -.. 921073016 — -_..— 4 92, 107301 921073012 92107301 1 II 1 t Legend 921073005 ii 921073014 ' ; Selected Fealures ,i Road System � Paroals-H 421071020 . Wetlands 1 Boundaries 921182006 n tebsm c,. Y yU Ora co.,, 921182003 s 0 1 \I 921182012 • ..._--_-- tip 921482005 92118204 i V:u..uu:dod:ry..ec-nl Carr.:Cn13-.31 x':!a,-,,t5 ti-3' 1 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed Feb 20 15:54:30 2008 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV... 2/20/2008 Map Output Page 1 of 1 921073020 MLA08-64 McMillen 921073007 ' 9210730131 19Qt0T30'3 �t 9T_Ci S�2S ` Y �i 1 ,. , \ 921073011., 9210730" I i 921073026 `, r ..�''- � �921073016f' 9210!S''c 9210730121073012. , II �I __ Legend 92+073005 ii ^ Selected Features 921U/301a Li .d Road System I �rr....y„ (_ Parcels-H i 921073020 Landslide Hazard 11 -4 Stodge 921182006 -1 g, 1-‹ 921182003 ;6 Boundaries 1 1 r1 .eNvaen Carp. n wrla 921181:'2 [ J Ones-Carets i92"BZ:kb W"82YY2 \Ixr:ruedu ,...cro'w-ICw'w Cara JC':.c,'..7-, '}®i. I I FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed Feb 20 15:55:01 2008 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV... 2/20/2008 Map Output Page 1 of 1 921073020 MLA08-64 McMillen 921073007 1, 921073013 9210730'3 921073 \ I I� \,9 ,, li ..._. ".�j 21073011 •, 9210730" ` 921073026 , ,� . \ \ t01 07301 o+ II I 921073012 9210T-�•'z 9210730535 1 Legend i____921073Ut4 a Selected Features 4 /1/4/ Road System mm. Parcels-14 I 921073020 FEMA FIRMS iii ■ A 921182006 ® AM ■ > .`g,I 921182003 'g 1 t Boundaries E I-I _e+batatCarxy n '.4xer 92116ic�•1 El II ;l ;f®3., FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed Feb 20 15:55:20 2008 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV... 2/20/2008 Map Output Page 1 of 1 921073020 MLA08-64 McMillen , / i 921073007 \ t' 9210730131, '21073025 ti 1�, 11 ∎ �_ �1, �021073011�i 9210130" • I t 492.a73(326 ' I 6 92to73o1s I 921730 1 921073012 921073&2 SLegend 921073005 i a Selected Features 921073014 4,6,/ Road System FT Parcels-H Critical Aquifer Recharge 921073020 Areas 1 921182006 ��:UNK of .Itt f_—.— SMRA 54190 t i•1 • saRPA i 0 1 i I Boundaries { r 9211&2012 El ." lSQ1 Care'' 'ova tf I I O. Camas It 9211822005 921182012�i. 11 s,:arowttsd by&Amman Carry'Cent.,Se}•am GtS . FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed Feb 20 15:55:42 2008 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&CI ientV... 2/20/2008 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ( 921073+020 MLA08-64 McMillen 921073007.__...-__A` 07,: 73013 I 92" _': rr?+ L. t■ -iiii,' I 921073025 1� t,;-- I `y r y 92107301P 9210730,. � 221073026 1 �r /k1:: 921073012792 16/_y�•2 92'073005 __...... Legend 921073014 9 Selected Features i / Road System '^'°'• r Parcels-H I 921073020 SIPZ Al Posy SPZ 921'8r__b El Ien Resit Sin X .._.—_,__y_ O Gummi SPZ Q7 b \ Boundaries ;211820:13 A I I ..eterstr Caret. ?T.X20"2 fI` n Oster Carters \1a:r.a'a:�itxl 1:-c^xr ci i u.rr.._c.r.a'dc c x'�Iti Cr 3_., FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed Feb 20 15:56:13 2008 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&CI ientV... 2/20/2008 Map Output Page 1 of 1 921 073020 MLA08-64 McMillen 1111M10-_10. w Inifferk Legend ?"'"-- Selected Fealures 9240.e30'4 Road System o, Parcels-H Shoreline Slope Stabarly ' � � kOSeilOd� ■ 1 U�..lS2rV.fi` Y U , � 'i Jvdle Penal E.ad>3ed_ D Uratme C1d L de { Boundaries Ojdllro Corry A I 1 '.]^c Co.lY.c^u Y2"B1CkiS � 92`�fi2(i'i 1 113as a'o:tloa 7:..ea-:an Cam Ce s So-e Q.:Gts 0 .. FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed Feb 20 15:56:35 2008 http://g isserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV... 2/20/2008 Map Output Page 1 of 1 921 073020_M LA08-64_M cM i l le n \ \ NtistilLit-;.: ri .11 • 1 ' .y it � y l 1 5 ti_ t1 r—.- ‘11 'NI 5\ t 1 f r y 'y �• Legend r yw L.y E �l5` y \ '� �' 0 Selected Features .5 : i \ N. 1 \ _ - • 0 Road System i 0%4t1 � - . r - 7 I Parcels-H L_—i ®.,,�+_ I- - USGS Topos• z •.s......4„. .' --y I • Boundaries ,. .1 O xhram Casty -.\ '.,lk. 1, p 'Nam %.; li 13t.4.■ .... sLI:\at 01.\II,I • C jed-Th kW 1 II...P1.11.4.4\\it. I�vbi% .•\ 4111 Thill;', ..;,.., iiiii. ,..—•■•—•1_ IC\ \lt:u.a,r.J_U:i.•eS:uI Curt.'Gtlr3 4 Loki 0 y k.ibk. ' . FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed Feb 20 15:56:56 2008 http://g isserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV... 2/20/2008 Map Output Page 1 of 1 921073020_MLA08-64_McMi l len ` • A Jat ■ +_7• &....410. � - f ,.h a ' . c .,� •r /_. lrr-, 'O, 4. 4'.°' f ' i III III•J4 .. ""� Legend �� �- 1 "►' may - + - a ti 1:3 Selected Features -/■'- ■% 'nr+,* .Y _ // Road System 4 t riy�'ti -z I 1 ParceWi iIl"'.'- ...r! _ 1 * xy. 2005 Aerial Photos s " ` "_t.• '; Boundaries ,� kakrsoi Cwty a '. El Kam r- % '`- _a'.. '.‘,. ♦iJlS' ri UM Coultas Ilii_ s L FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed Feb 20 15:57:13 2008 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV... 2/20/2008 Map Output Page 1 of 1 921073020 MLA08-64 McMillen 9Y Q?30ib ',� r 92 92'0/3026 '$ •. I. .J Legend 0 Selected Features ./ Road System ,,..,,.,,,—...,.,,,.,,_._,.. Parcets-14 ':2 =''',.:o:: I Boundaries Water Service Areas O n c. » z D - n C:rrv,r!1A I •A PT Putrc•YR 92"d2cC7 c Septic Zones Undo A92"=!82012 Rally ^ ..... .92"820::3 92"820°2 %Ceps prmdal o:.mem Carty C *i Bvriea.GtS _...._.._..._..__. -- 3_�..1 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Wed Feb 20 15:49:30 2008 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientV... 2/20/2008 DRD 5/28/2008 Attending: Donna, Zoe, David, Terry, Cara, Michelle ITEM: Stand Alone RAP's/ESA's—Terry Shoreline slope stability off Aldrich road across from Chevy Chase golf course. They've only applied for RAP. Is there a standard condition Terry can add? Decision: Zoe had a similar case, condition as"for work in the right of way only". Zoe will help Terry with a condition for the slope stability condition. ITEM: Oak Bay Rd & Jefferson Driveway is already existing. Runs between Oak Bay Rd and Jefferson . Want to change the address to existing access off Jefferson. Any conditions? ESA's are slight landslide hazard and shoreline slope stability. There's an existing house on the parcel. Decision: Condition as RAP only. ITEM: PWD Sign? In P.L.—Michelle Colleen and Michelle worked with Josh Peters. PW on Paradise Bay Rd, lamp-posts are already existing. PW is going to mount blank sign for community to post advertisement for specials. Total of 8 poles, 7 square feet per pole. PL sign policies doesn't address. Doesn't seem like there's criteria for specialty signs. This is in a ROW, so would we have jurisdiction? Decision: 18.30.150 (4)(a). We will review as type I consistency review. One permit would cover all 8. A custom condition should be added referring to Port Ludlow Signs policies. ITEM: McMillen—Hold Harmless—Michelle This is a residential building permit. None of the mapping identified a landslide hazard area. Between Yarr Rd and Oak Bay Road in location of deep rotational slide. Conclusions of geotech—proposed building site is outside of large land movement, but within slow creep as suggested by bowed trees. Will we require a hold harmless? Decision: (1) Go through criteria that Geotech needs to address, a top of slope is noted in the site plan, (2) ask NTI to address the slope (is there a setback recommended?). ITEM: Mats Mats Quarry Shoreline Exemption Extension—Al This permit expired in November of 2003. Can it be extended? Decision: New fee and permit approval required. ITEM: PTPC—Beaver Deceiver in Shoreline—Cara The culvert replacement project on landfill haul road was determined to be an exemption. PTPC is now Decision: exemption 2 or 3 as maintenance. ITEM: Janet Kearsly DNR NAP Cut/Fill/Restore—JC permitting—Cara This project is for the restoration of the Dabob Bay Natural Area Preserve. Removal of about an acre of fill. Decision: SEPA exempt(24) —critical area exempt—removal isn't under SMP jurisdiction—isn't development (administrator has determined, per 18.40, is exempt, no review). ITEM: Port Ludlow/DOT Temp Ferry Terminal 821093001 —David Michelle did permit for park in ride at the Shine Pit, and there would be shuttle to ferry. They're considering ferry from Kingston to Port Ludlow. PLA wants to consider area in resort complex Ludlow bay village for temporary parking lot. What type of permitting would be required? The parking area is temporary, would put in gravel to prevent mud. Decision: Shoreline permit(primary use) for a transportation facility. SEPA would review cumulative. Temporary use over 45 days is type A permit under development agreement. DOT could be applicant, PLA would sign as property owner. ITEM: Public Works Easement—Owner's Signature—Cara The PW department is applying for a stormwater permit where they have easements across private properties. Will the landowners be required to sign the MLA? Decision: No signature needed from landowners. ADMIN Staff Reports—Zoe Zoe would like to have a heads up for staff reports coming up so that she can add to work flow. Manger—dejeuner—Stacie Cheeseburgers in paradise! Virtual sign up sheet for goodies. Thursday June 12th. L.L ash 4*}}, , m — ' - tom. flni,flpr_ o ;n ,,, Prospect Ave 3 a a 2 7 Arden St Port 7ndim�Island 4 hondale Rd Townsend8sy 3 Rd m Irondale ', Oj6 Hordland 3rd St �� I A� Meade Rd _........... Marrowelone Port Hadlock eG, island Q: 116 4> 0 d Hoyt R' 0 o K 9 ca,rii fi 3 111 w eke Rd � '� p Robbins Rd Disney �a ca ll °� �1 Property PegetSoun• Chimacum 3 Location Ias m9 ti n cc r4',e4. 0�. m c s::, t ' GEOTECHNICAL REPORT 1 Prepared For Ken & Aimee McMillen July 3, 2007 IFor the Property Described As Tax#'s 921182006 & 921073020 ISection 18, Township 29 North, Range 1 East, W.M. Jefferson County, Washington ' Prepared by NTI Engineering and Surveying 717 S. Peabody Street Port Angeles, Washington 98362 I Phone 360-452-8491 Fax 360-452-8498 Web Site www.nti4u.com E-mail info @nti4u.com I I NTI ENGINEERING & SURVEYING J ArA 717 SOUTH PEABODY STREET,PORT ANGELES,WA 98362 Engineers Land Surveyors Geologists Construction Inspection Materials Testing (360)452-8491 1-800-654-5545 FAX 452-8498 E-Mail:infoOnti4u.com NTI www.nti4u.com July 3, 2007 Ken & Aimee McMillen 1734 Oak Bay Road Port Had lock, WA 98339 ' Subject: Geotechnical Report for the Property Described as Tax #'s 921182006 & 921073020, Located in Section 18, T29N, R1 E, W.M., Jefferson County, WA Dear Mr. & Mrs. McMillen: ' Background At your request, NTI Engineering and Surveying, Inc. (NTI) conducted a geotechnical ' inspection of the above-mentioned property on June 11, 2007. The purpose of this inspection was to examine the property by visual means for any obvious signs of geologic concern and to make recommendations in regards to the development of the ' property in accordance with the Jefferson County Critical Areas Ordinance. It is our understanding that you plan to construct a single-family residence on the property. Site Description ' The subject property is located on Yarr Road off of Oak Bay Road (Figure 1). The property is bounded on the north and south by residential property, on the west by Oak ' Bay Road, and on the east by Oak Bay (Figure 2). There is an existing house on the property overlooking Oak Bay. It is our understanding that there will be a boundary line adjustment to create an east and west parcel rather than the current north and south ' parcel arrangement, and that the new house will be built on the west parcel in the approximate location shown on Figure 3. The house site is more than 300' west of the -30' high marine bluff. This report focuses on the west parcel. The property is well vegetated with young to mature trees and brush. The property slopes gently towards the east at approximately 8° (14%). There is what appears to be the edge of a slide scarp on the south side of the property, visible in Figure 3. The ' topography suggests that this scarp is the left (north) flank of the slide area, which continues southward. Old Oak Bay Road, which is just south of the property, was rerouted, reportedly due to ongoing slide activity. There is evidence of earth movement ' on the property. The existing house has been damaged, and many of the trees on the property have bowed trunks indicating slope creep. ' It is believed that the location of the proposed house is outside the area of the larger earth movements. This is indicated by the lack of visible scarps as can be seen on the I ' topographic map (Figure 3). To further explore the area for ground cracks, a 4' deep by 45' long trench was dug through the proposed building site in an east-west direction I (Photo 1). The soil was found to be homogeneous and without distinct bedding, which if present, could aid in the detection of past earth displacement. However, no cracks were observed in the trench, which further suggests that the building site is outside the area I of the larger earth movements. The site is however believed to be in an area of slow downslope creep as suggested by the bowed trunks of many of the trees in the area. The home site area is relatively dry compared to the scarp area to the south, which is wet and supports water loving plants such as horsetail ferns. The soil in the trench was mottled, which is indicative of water being periodically trapped in the soil or moving through it slowly. The neighbor northeast of the subject property indicated that water I does come out of the slope west of his house during the winter. He also stated that he has not experienced any settlement damage to his house or garage. I 4q m � ' Prospect Ave q co�° 7.70 a 3 x n ' Arden St Port Indian Island . Irondale Rd Townsend Bay m 4 Rd I Irondele 7) 3rd St 6/, t1ordland 's.. Meade Rd Marrows tone I 116 Port Hadlock Island 'a N.. Rd � Hoyt Fo g 11 b o 0 I K g l2ke Rd W I / O 0 Robbins Rd Disney m - 1 Chimacum I P cation Puget Sounr a m 0. I G n �� Po, c 1 -PG Figure 1 I I I I I .> Arr"art .4114►,0r iii.sr, ''- .. . ' . F a 47 _ 1t fi p f "14 f ua ,1 .a .. i a 1 w f , wzr��, it i ...--,, . if e A ` , Subject ' J ` �t !tf ,+h, ' , Property II 4J y I . o ;. ^ti-, A tom . I - i• « r • • , , .. p. ♦ j * 1 t a f. J. •w ' Naps Aw�ded by i Carty Cass 9sferm(#S u: Ai ""8 t �0....... .....................\ ?t9N Figure 2 I Mapped Geology of the Site and Vicinity IAccording to the Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington (United States Department of Agriculture, 1975), the property is in an area mapped as Tukey gravelly I loam (TuD) and Hoypus gravelly sandy loam (HvC). The Tukey soil is mapped on the west side of the property including the building area, and formed on terraces in glacial till. The soil is very compact below about 24 to 36 inches, which may cause water to be perched above this zone during the wet months. The Hoypus soil is mapped on the east I side of the property and formed in glacial outwash on terraces. Generally, the Tukey soil is less permeable than the Hoypus soil. I The Washington State Department of Ecology's Coastal Zone Atlas maps the property and vicinity as Vashon lodgement till (Qvt1). This soil is described as consisting of a compact mixture of boulders, cobbles, pebbles, sand, silt and clay, generally overlain by 1-5 feet of ablation till. The Atlas maps the stability of the property vicinity as Stable. The Department of Ecology's "Geology and Ground-Water Resources of Eastern I Jefferson County, Washington" maps the property as Lodgement till (Qvt). The till is described as boulders, cobbles and pebbles in a matrix of sand, silt and clay; a compact and unsorted mixture. There is also a band of undifferentiated sedimentary rocks (Ts) I mapped along the shoreline in the vicinity of the property. This unit is described as mudstone, siltstone, sandstone, or conglomerate. I Visual observations made in the test pits at the site revealed the upper soils to be predominantly sandy silt or silty sand with some gravel and cobbles. The soil is mottled, 1 I indicating that water is trapped in the soil or moves through it slowly during the wet season. No stratification of the soil was visible. These observations most closely ' correlate with the Tukey soil described above. I Approximate Location of + } House Site I w,, } a i C � z m i o 1 i ( T I ���.._— 4. / 1 ( 4r it '1 w A a. jai 311eft I Figure 3 Conclusions and Recommendations ' The subject property appears to be adjacent to and within an area of large scale earth movement. The proposed building site however, appears to be outside the area of the I larger earth movements. The site is however believed to be in an area of slow downslope creep as suggested by the bowed trunks of many of the trees in the area. I It should be anticipated that a house constructed on this site may be subject to more than normal settlement which may show up as cracks, uneven areas, damaged underground utilities, etc. We recommend that this possibility be considered in the I design of the house. Possible mitigating measures could include placing a modular home on the site that could be relatively easily and periodically leveled in the event of settlement. Another possibility for a site built home might be using a type of foundation that could withstand more than the normal amounts of settlement (total and differential), I such as a raft or waffle type foundation. If this type of foundation is decided upon, we recommend that a Structural Engineer familiar with this type of situation be consulted. I t 1 "or- . k J 5 .t�r I I I • 4R^l I t .n #, J t w r # r °' Y e ISy Y 1. t 1 d c i a t i.rr. " w A'-'-.A,' F'"a �-4 " tt -,` k i r 4ca. . y rp•- art :u t " t - Z � g a ..w r" �i ' � .F�6 �t ,,_� ''S T y .y R y I wg i ivT. �� .xr,. .� } ,� 6�3y 't Y Y A `- :,.i. r a r yt ;-'-' ..*-"•;• ''., V �. •i�.„'Y>,.Ny.1.w • r . '. •4 ' `-.•w.� #� \ a +4 ,may x1 4a. �T Photo 1 I IThe following recommendations should also be considered with regards to development of the subject property: 1. We recommend that footing drains be incorporated in the house design if a site I built house is constructed. Footing drains should be kept separate from roof drains. A curtain drain placed uphill of the house may help stabilize the site by removing some of the seasonal groundwater flowing through the site. I2. It will be necessary to maintain ground cover to reduce erosion from surface runoff. Any bare areas that develop should be revegetated. Native deep-rooted Ivegetation that requires little or no irrigation would be the most beneficial. 3. Heavy irrigation or other activities that would contribute large quantities of water to the soil should be avoided. One cause of slope instability is the presence of ' excessive groundwater. I I I4. Runoff from hard surfaces such as roofs, driveways, walkways and patios should be controlled and routed to a drainage control system such that surface water I discharge to adjacent properties does not exceed predevelopment conditions. We recommend dispersion or infiltration downhill of the home site area. The drainage control system should comply with all applicable regulations. I5. Silt fences or other sediment control devices may be needed during construction such that sedimentation to adjacent properties does not exceed predevelopment conditions. I 6. All drainage control devices should be maintained in good working order and inspected at least once a year. I Limitations IThis report has been prepared exclusively for use by you and your agents in conjunction with the above referenced project. The report has not been prepared for use by others ' or for other locations. Others may use it only with the expressed written permission of the Engineer. Within the limits of scope, schedule and budget, this report was prepared in general I accordance with accepted professional engineering and geological principles and practices in this or similar localities at the time the report was prepared. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice Iincluded in this report. The observations, conclusions and recommendations presented in this report were I based on our visual observations of the subject property at the time of our site visit; no laboratory tests were performed. Soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between test holes and/or surface outcrops. If there is a substantial lapse of time, conditions at the site have changed or appear different than those described in this I report, we should be contacted and retained to evaluate the changed conditions and make modifications to our report if necessary. I Sincerely, �Ri o „ wts, 4c y F pe ' � NTI ENGINEERING & SURVEYING n - ' . / I / f IRobert A. Leach, P.E., MBA EXPIRES 12/30/2008 Principal Engineer I O +r� , ,C �`I. , o a f_ Bill Payton, L.E.G. �f `" - �'"J► Engineering Geologist �--� cra w• s.: i, ; '7— ---07 I G:1Gen\Bill\Reports\MCMK0701.18(29-IEj.bluff stability.Oak Bay Rd.doc '6d co 0`-. FEB 5 2008 Iwilliam C. Payton Jrj I I 1 _J �w,,•�t'. �'', T, y 'f ;J 2,� »p.0 �,Li�S'"iJ 4 t h]I I,aA T♦!/l; y,Y,MJ/ i #'T•A D® C cn y . 1�_ V i , , J4' V J J ht• P`U y �U t 5 /O } 2 ,c.'3J • f_ ? a a < pp je co •ui • 4a\V \ . { � ; .4. s s t } r Y a t i:Rt. :t 76,� a Td ny v ,kY w lr r a. r� ', ttr 5 r S�pr 4 ip�G ?'J ; , c r . cn r1": (7 � .. �. x r ,.wP ;*`k' x 't'�• 5 $ b2 f., µ J, - �4w� `t' i+c:. �i s ,t'"i F!' "t+�'C 1s ry� . —z Tlu^ Y p e 2 it r ;,. &s x • 'fE`I[ >ur""c 7 L„° J"k+.•6'�.-. n �Kti7•CD O Y^Y ' •' J Y 'R j•+ r3 ! Y ar I eTyJy�y�"J } '' rr 2 Y pX Y 1 A J , i i. i,t �' t V: t 4 ,Wry P y, f . .w"t r-F e x. fig. i [' m-l e ,* N 'ti R JI (t'b MfM n { y'. p r „.±....„•r " ,gyp ' r}} x . ! �1.� ._ i . `,F�t`' r t � .,,,i1§..3,:...., Tn +� �° 1,..,-, `ri��°. ` •y'y" t•, nl L .4 2 t vY y t co,4 ," „,,kStlq 4\ : ' ykti ,-,.II . CO co ^l .., ” Y, M r 7 i!`� {5!+4 5+`s.. 1 O i "— °1 `* L }�r4Y t • pr¢ty`•r) .) 44e. ;Y�x 2) l't1 { Nub N v r wIf�`h `� Aq1; Cn O - t t2 '�• :r, ° \4^Y `S'°r'>1' r >`n'c r , t, x y, �. } ,e .r 1g u'„o ntA 1 t .M'+ rry '' 4 to i �' k i rot � F lC c •t 'r,; 3PA Y+ rHS t � 1 r 5 c r ,ff f v l :y ,71.41.•-•" 4. ' k '''' 11) -1im f rteP , �{ 1 O ,?I ' 1 1..-‘ 2il:fl'Ui vW°C i' iH Mt 1 ° 4 T ° R cn W t ✓ ""s '�W94> 'Ale 3' 2 .'„k,� . u >_v Y t /� • ¢` 4 11$1. I N; 4, . I \.. O Il,. ii• b A' it O p .1 J . C'. V` C1+ 1�.� c r 00 / 4 t ti C: i1 'Y 4. ' V- (�-, ' .. y''''' .r L Y e,Y 't '} W 0., / Yn' ✓?.yi . „- � k ,.. .....t.,„, /' co cc co , 06 JEFF ERSON COUNTY � \' DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT '' 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend •Washington 98368 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax • �S�1I1VCs,0 www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment Master Permit Application MLA: OS Project Description (include separate sheets as necessary): Sifl�l�-(- ivy I,ly house__ Tax Parcel Property Number: 92_1 01 3 ■20 Size: , . I a (acres/square feet) Site Address and/or Directions to Property: R,C f F Cj CL k 6 R O--,-__) 1 Pc' T` I �Ci((. Property ner(s)of Record: JP -A c " Ph(nee_ m/',m1 I (Pr) / Telephone: 562 • 3 O 1 S 1 Fax:3(pp �S5 �1��,°( email: pimP.P.fYtGmilleriakVtai: Mailing Address: 1114 (),0,,Y... GA- Rn1). "P+. Hatt icc k w pr oiszgA,e[ Applicant/Agent(if different from owner): SarY'P . Telephone: Fax: email: Mailing Address: What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies ZBuilding El Variance(Minor, Major or Reasonable Economic Use) ❑ Demolition Permit ❑ Conditional Use[C(a), C(d),or C]** 1g Single Family ❑ Garage Attached/Detached ❑ Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification ❑ Manufactured Home ❑ Modular ❑ Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)** ❑ Commercial * ❑ Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Change of Use ❑ Short Plat** ❑ Address ❑ Road Approach ❑ Binding Site Plan** ❑ Home Business ❑ Cottagelndustry ❑ Long Plat** • Propane ❑ Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Amendments** ❑ Sign ❑ Plat Vacation/Alteration** ❑Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis ❑ Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions** XStormwater Management ❑ Shoreline Management Substantial Development** ❑ Site Plan Approval Advance Determination (SPAAD)* ❑ Shoreline Management Variance ❑Temporary Use ❑ Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment El Wireless Telecommunication* ❑Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment ❑ Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium ❑ Tree Vegetaion Request *May require a Pre—Application Conference **Requires a Pre-Application Conference Please identify any other local, state or federal permits required for this proposal, if known: ff.",;ew,,-{-4 e. .47c��/j�,,, DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate ,-z,�wmp-,, ,. rei, to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). J/ Cc . ,4f.4/r//-.r. , - /�OWNER SIGNATURE ..../., �.., ' ,_ , dad s_. .,. __ Date: 1/3/?rte By signing this application form,the owner/agent attes at the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his, her or it's knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. Staffs access and right of entry will be assumed unless the applicant informs the County in writing at the time of the applicatipn that he or she wants prior no' e. !i �l Signature:. �L._, j 44. //.?/- _ ex r Date: -ja:-e The action or actions Applicant will undertake -s a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species and could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual, group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are in compliance with the Jefferson County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-transfer ble._responsibility foyyy�a(��1 herin to and o pily�g e ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaime and signs and dates it below. Signature: N ...� ° ` G IA l;(/t - Date: 2 1 O Q- v G:\PermitCenter\###FORMS###\DRD FORMS\Master Permit Application 12-19-2OO6.doc road Page 1 of 1 ROAD LOG INFORMATION FOR OAK BAY RD ROAD NUMBER;C569906 ROAD NAME:OAK BAY RD CROSSROAD NUMBER:C940407 CROSSROAD:OAK BAY RD. CROSSROAD MILE POST:0.86 CROSSROAD LEFT OR RIGHT;C ROAD LENGTH:9.94 GRID ROAD STARTS:E-12-C MODIFY DELETE ADDRESS SEARCH ROAD SEARCH CREATION DATE SEARCH • http://isserver/address/RoadDetail.asp?ROAD_NUMBER=C569908 5/27/2008 May 27, 2008 KENNETH A MC MILLEN TRTEE JEANNE M MC MILLEN TRTEE 1734 OAK BAY RD PORT HADLOCK WA 983399726 RE: SITE ADDRESS: 2007 OAK BAY RD MLA#: MLA08-00064 Dear KENNETH A MC MILLEN TRTEE: Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff have reviewed the application materials for the above project proposal and have determined that the application is substantially complete. Additional information needed for project review may be requested in writing by the Director or Project Planner. Please call the Department of Community Development if you have any questions. Sincerely, Department of Community Development Staff c: File May 27, 2008 Dear Reviewer, RE: MLA08-00064 Jefferson County has forwarded the attached application to you for review and comment because your agency is responsible for determining compliance with state and federal requirements or may otherwise be affected by the following proposal: NEW SFR WING 250 GAL PROPANE TANK Comments must be received within fourteen (14) calendar days or by June 10, 2008. If no written response has been received within fourteen (14)days, your agency will be presumed to have no comments. If necessary, the UDC administrator may grant an extension of time for comment. Please contact at (360)379-4450 if you desire an extension of time or have additional questions regarding this proposal. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, c: , ON 00 JEFFERSON COUNTY • r :-, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ' ' 4 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend•Washington 98368 FEB 1 5 2008 360/379-4450.360/379-4451 Fax http://www.cojefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ Stormwater Calculation Worksheet IMLA# 0"e3 _ PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: rn Lm i I le- 1 if(.j`l DETERMINING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS:This stormwater calculation worksheet should be completed first to classify the proposal as'small,'"medium,"or with astand-abne stormwater management ��• The size determines whether a Stormwater Site Plan is required in conjunction involves stormwater review. The basic information will application,helpful for ling application, or other land use approval aired application that P completing a Stormwater Site Plan,if required. . r PARCEL SIZE(I.E.,SITE) Size of parcel :�ar acres An acre contains 43,560 square feet. Multiply the acreage by this figure. Size of parcel in square feet 2V r1s'--;1` . C' • Land-disturbing activity is any activity that results in movement of earth, or a change in the existing soil cover(both vegetative and non-vegetative) and/or the existing soil topography. Land disturbing activities include, but are not limited to clearing, grading, filling, excavation,and compaction associated with stabilization of structures and road construction. Native vegetation is vegetation comprised on plant species,other than noxious weeds,that are indigenous to the coastal region of the Pacific Northwest and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally oocur on the site. Douglas fir,western hemlock,western red cedar,alder,big-leaf Examples include species such as and salal;herbaceous plants such as sword fern,foam flower,and maple, vine maple;shrubs such as willow,elderberry,salmonberry, LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY,CONVERSION OF NATIVE VEGETATION,AND VOLUME OF CUT/FILL Calculate the total area to be cleared,graded,filled, excavated,and/or compacted for proposed development Answer the following two questions related to project. Include in this calculation the area to be cleared for: conversion of native vegetation: Construction site for structures nrl :� .:i Does the project convert 3'4 acres or more of Drainfield,septic tank,etc. , ._ it32 sq/ft native vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas? sq/ft Circle: Well,utilities,etc. .6)0 Yes No sq/ft Does the project convert 2 Yz acres or more of Driveway,parking,etc. ,;63'. !(f!'' ill sq/ft native vegetation to pasture? Circle: Yes Lawn,landscaping,etc. 5O() sq/ft Other compacted surface,etc. sq/ft Indicate Total Volumes of Proposed: Total Land Disturbance • T1 r • sq/ft Cut Fill (cufyd) • rover] stomtwater cafe worksheet—REV.10/1/2003 1 Impervious surface is a hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle as under natural conditions prior to development. A hard surface area which causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to roof tops, walkways, patios, driveways, parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads, packed earthen materials, • and oiled,macadam or other surfaces which similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. STORMWATER CALULATIONS-IMPERVIOUS SURFACE NEW 1.etee'd.teiftb EXISTING Structures(all roof arr?a L!4!"y4 { � sq/ft Structures(all roof area) sq/ft Sidewalks sq/ft Sidewalks sq/ft Patios sq/ft Patios sq/ft Solid Decks sq/ft Solid Decks sq/ft (without infiltration below) (without infiltration below) Driveway \/2-00 sq/fl Driveway sq/ft Other ?oy - QKPa„ 2-5D split Other stl/ft Total New split Total Existing sq/ft 2.80 2,s4gb TOTAL NEW+TOTAL EXISTING* sq/ft This amount will be used to check total lot coverage. The following questions will help determine whether the proposed project is considered development or redevelopment. DEVELOPMENT v. REDEVELOPMENT • Divide the total exfsti a impervious surface above by the size of the parcel and convert to a percentage: .- % Does the site have 35%or more of existing impervious surface? Circle: Yes FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS: If the answer is yes, the proposal is considered redevelopment and the attached Figure 2 should be used to determine the applicable Minimum Requirements. If the answer is no, the proposal is considered new development and the attached Figure 1 should be used. At this juncture,the applicant should refer to the applicable Flow Chart to determine the Minimum Requirements for stormwater management. DCD staff will help verify the classification of the project and the application requirements. For proponents of 'small" projects who must comply only with Minimum Requirement #2—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention—an additional submittal is not required. The proponent is responsible for employing the 12 Elements to control erosion and prevent sediment and other pollutants from leaving the site during the construction phase of the project. Pick up the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet. Proponents of"medium"projects—those that must meet only Minimum Requirements #1 through #5 and for large" projects—those that must meet all 10 Minimum Requirements—are required to submit a Stormwater Site Plan. DCD has prepared a submittal template of a Stormwater Site Plan, principally for rural residential projects. Complete the template in the Stormwater Site Plan Instructions and Submittal Template or prepare a Stormwater Site Plan using the step-by-step guidance in the Stormwater Management Manual. APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Stormwater Calculation Worksheet, I as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. .1._ AA. IL. - EEP 15 200 ,?,D-og ( frn NER Or • '-•REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) • stom wale`calc worksheet—REV.10/12003 2 m 13 .'• 00 ° � GI- m 0 0 � -� 7) 70 a 1d0 C _ C c.--1 m m p i. `�'- l 9'69Z r moo 213 co wood N 0 1 _} �, o co i, --1 w cA � r O a o cn V(\ (S� -- 7--.. l/� - . .. r � 1 \ ' ' // \ J / furl rin Dr kin ' rm m ir gyp, Iry x j vy OS l °- z v I I r' tJl(� '� il\ Or ' ` + ,PIP �� a°1s�°a°L' I 0 1r p--C>r) . rP d -0 _ \ 0 o3 x -5 0 Fr . 1 , co 0, „ , (...7) 1 __, m $‘ " m 1 ,Z2.69Z � w Re. 70 1 1, * -rp CI 18 g 74- = I 0 -ID CO � 0 O Pr- �m u n m o -, 4 � r J t I I I Or I -- I N -' 0-p ; , 6 g) gi (& ! ------- 0 so D /---Q /7 co z I lip L� 0 N O O I f hb>i.ril'! r i : , _)- o F ___ . .. , s N , • . �[� • W LL . r .1\r"` --. Lf._ 1 + _ . 1 • 151 _ �25� : .° - I • 3 i • -Y >�:t G IC - i - - _ 4.- •12 ' ID EN 3 .26- X i 3 • . 'ILI 3 x jIS • J.. . 29. x_.. L OSE-f I1''.X(D 6o' L ` C- _ - CL.C) ET. BA_—TH:.i �.._ ..: '• - 1 L �. -.. —{ L Z C oSCf GoS�T .. .._ -t. I -- _._ ..._.� ._._ _.._. .- .- -.. f - -- - r -_ ' �.I-�.. - t1 V — 3' 3` x T — MA ?�tLtSerFrt BE��c�Jr1 ID `I — } 9'9 - io'3 1 �, - ffl�3 . :- - _:_ _ .". r — 1 • _L _ Z^1D FLoDIZ C F it CV11' f 1 t i h - _ - _ t:l C" O) 9 1 its L s N .. .. ) . 9 1 CO .. Lt.c� j • 151 25_. .• 3 • - l.9 ._.- .-- tGIC • • { 1 - 1 E-- I __ • .:..: = • _ M 1 t R -3� ►� DEN ti- 3x l• 9 ' - S _• 4_ j -/ z� -- _CC.-OSF- f rd�_XCafb' - — os9' i31�7Wr , < • i GLoSci ,.� _ 7 - ___ _ _ 3x3` tl' �, • — MA5Zt7t2l Part BEt7�c��tF ID `I ---4- trl�' i r a 11 1 _ I ! _ _ - - r 2ND _ LOp� • v _ _ ■ he�.a-c: _ — -__. 1/y _ I I T — • • Y/ s sx • • . 4 V • , 1 : 1 .!. I. r i 1- 1 1;4.•4; : r. 1 J 1 1 1 I 1 I ' I 1 • ` I ; • ■ !• ; • ■ I ! i . .I• 1 i • 1 ! 4 * I I 1 I -' I i..i i i 1 �' I ,. I ! 1 I I 1 1 I ' . I I 1 ' I ■ 1 1 , 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I v , 1 ' 1 1 1 I , • I • I ' I .I ' ( 1 I 1. �. 1 1 ' 1 t I i I , I I I I : I ; I p ! �. F I I 1 ' I ! I ' I 1 I 1 I I ! I - • 1'1 1 11 1. , 1 f : 1 I ' ' I II I. I 1 I ! 1 I I ! 1 Y , 1 1 1 1 •1 1 11 i- t 1 ' 1. .4 ! I i ! 1 1 ' 11 ! I I 1 I : j.. O : 1 , - 1 i , 1 - /I 1 1 i 1 1 [ 11 li I I 1 1 I I I L f ! 1 .E I � : 1 i I I; 1 , •1•7 ' . : ;, i. - ' � I !. -. 1 , T! 1 , I I I .I J I { I. 1 I. • 1- i • I 1 I 1 • ! i I 1 I 1 ; i I , I_ 11 I 1 ; 1 I i i I 1 : 1 1 . , � � 1 1 I I i , 1 1 1 f . .. .: ' 1 . I , : i ' : 1 ' 1 1 1 , I I 1 I CY ...1 J .1 . - 1 I. I t I , 1 : h i•• � ' I i ��}K 1 1 1 I I 1 1I I ' ' • I ' f r. 71,-1-71,-"T'7-_,-; i •i .. ! ��F ! : - -'77:, 1 .... f 1 1 I I I �y 1 I jal...!• + - I I ? :••••• 1 6� ;• :- i 1 • ''- `•1 I ' I I t _1 I 1 . IA 1. k C ' ' ' 1` N N �i I • • . I 1. !- i 1 '. i. lO� I j 1 1 1 I j 1 ; : i i 1 F LI U!�/: ! I1 1 1,..; t 1 j..7 :, , 1 1 1 , i. l I 1 1 I • 1 , 1 , I J i : I :.• , P. : 1 .. I 1 1 I -! V`.i. ; 1 I 1 1 .I I ' ! 1 •! I i , I 1 � , . : 1 ' � I I I 1 i I I 1 ; 1. , I t 1 . :. ! 1 ' I i 111 I 1 1 1 , :-1 ; -- I 1 1 1...i I 1i 1 w. : 1 1 _ I 1 , J 1;11 i , i I I f ��• i 1 l•u i 1 1 R/�I'•: o 1 . � '..c..• 1 :I ' ' I 1 :,. I i : .; I I . /j• !' : : , ; ;I , _ .-I I 1 1 i.. i I , . _ • 1 . -1 I..1. ' ;I I 1_,1,._:_-_-__,:: 1 1 , r 1• I I 1 A: . : I . . ., ! I • 1 : � I : 1. 11.1. J I 1 , , , .1 I 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 I 1 I _ I : I 1_ V-I 1 I I.•l EC , r i I'_I. 1 I I I- I I 1 1 J 1 I l 1 ' I I I 1 I I i• h f 1 1 I i i. 1 1 I i i •I_, , 1 1 1.1 t 1 L. i E• :� : ! I vi.: I1.�'. , 1 , ; : I - X I I 1 1 : '-- 'YI I,.•' 1 _ 1 I 1" I ! 1 I. sQ r I1 1 1 I _ , `-+ F Iti I -: 1 1 ' • I ■ 1 II I 1 1 i 1 i 1 1 i j : 1 -'`. �- ' t... 1 I ; i ! 1 '. 1".1.1• , 1 j I. 1 ' \ '-' ; 1 ! 1 . ,. 1 1 I , :- 1 I ". . c -171 j.:. I ' {.1 > i i' ! 1 .I II L. L..I � 1 I.. I . 1.; .1... _i - ..• 1 I \ 1 1 ! L 1. I - !, ' I i f..; ., ; t 1-Z ' .1 11 i I 1-. ! ...I. 1 r I : 1 I 1 1 I I _ ; I 1 '• , - 1 :I: I ; 1 1 1 i .I i.--; I l i•! 1 i i .1 i 1 1 j 'I 1 I i 1 1 1 1 1 7 i 1 , I 1 1 11 1 .. ,.. 1 I i".I I I __ ' _ W 1 ' Z ' ..I. I • 1 I• 1 1 1 , 1 I 1 1 1 ' .• • ' 1 ' 1 1 1 I I I I ! l 1 1 ! i I 1 1 1 1 �. 1 1 1 I 1 ;%;;;;7.-.,11: ; : ! 1:1 ;i:7::.,. ;t 1 I 1 i�l 1 1 ` 1 1 ; 1 I 1 I ' 1 1 ! j;i 1 1,e1 1' j : I I , I- , 1 , 1 � II i 1 II 1 1 1 11 1 �•: t 1 L I I HI 1 I , 1 1 I i I „ 1 1 :•-j 1 1 I i' 1 ! ! 1- 1 ' I. I.. I J ._ t. , 1 1 .1.. i L � � • I i.. _ 1..1 11i 1T1 ! 1 . 1,. 1 1 I j I I .• 7 I .' 1 I I ; .:1 i I 1 ..; • ! 1..4,, 1 7 ! ;••1 I _1.1' 1 I I ' � .I. I \\ 1 1 1 1 . : I f L 1. 1,".; f , _ { 1 i 1 I 1.I i i , )) 1 + II I E- ... 1 : I. : 1 1 . ' I 1 I T 1 1 1 1 1 I � i i ! !,- I F� I , ; 1 ,. • > ( I ' f ' I �: I I I 1 ! I� I ! 1 , j. • 1 I ! ,. ! 1 , ! . . r •. i 1 1 ! , ,. •, _i 1 , '..i_ J 1 ! 1 1 1 ,� 1. I : I , , ! I I 1 I 1 , �_I i r I 1 1 ,• , I -r 1 ; , : 1 - !• 1..i 1,..�••• ■ I • I i :-•1-'-f: I:'i 1..• 1 I J : , : 1 ' 1 ' I : f I I ' i T I , ; ' a 1 `f 1 ! I ! : I 1 1 I 1 ' F i 1 I I i ;., 1 ,,.. t 1 ; ! I : _ 11 : 1 , ; , I 1 i . .' . 1 1 r 3 I;. ..,_ I ! I 1 ,- 1 i II j- - 1 1 - 1 ! 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I -7 , 1 I 1 r 1 I 1-.1 : _ 1 ■ .. 1 1 I , 1, 1 I : , 1 1 1 7 I 11 1 . 1 1 1 1 -. I i ! ! ! 1 Tt ! 4... - 1 1 1 1 1 I -ii 1 .1 i ., , ;_I 1 : 1 1 , I _ I 1 i I I. �'. , ! 1 t 1 ;. i , I 1 I I : 1 i .. I. 3 I ; ::, s i 1 I- 1 7.1 I I_ I j ;- ; 1'( ! (� I 1 .: '.I' I i � 1 i ! , J 1 I : , V�.. I I , : , :.;.:, ;; ; ; ; ;• :- i :,:: :. ;i iy1r ` 1 "�'' .• i ; , I 1 I , .- - 1 1--!--1-•••-:-•-•I .1 1 -1-!---1...-1-7-1--! 'rG-.I _�.. F I-.J_.I 1-'. 1 ! 1.-1 j ' ' 1 . i ' 1 I I • i i ' 1 I ! I 1 I �1 !-I . , P I 1-. F.I I 1 :1 1 ;• v 1 I ; 1 1 is I. , 1 1. 1. 1 ' : 1 1 I I. • �Q i I ' , 1 .I I 1 �_�-i 1 I 1 1 - 1 1.. - I 1 -.. . : 1 : 1 ; I ' I 1 1 r ..1_; I 1 ■ 1(,11 I ! , 1 I ' ' 1 1 1 !•i• I ' 1 1 III I• I + ' - 1 1 11 j• 1 ! 1 i 1 I .J... 4..._ t..1 r ! , CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR Parcel 921182006 Printed: February 20, 2008 Cases Name Review Tvpe Status Planner SUB07-00011 MLA07-00188 MC MILLEN TRTEE I P Application Received: 4/18/2007 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: Boundary Line Adjustment No findings, conditions, or permissions found. BLD08-00065 MLA08-00064 MC MILLEN TRTEE I P Application Received: 2/15/2008 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: NEW SFR W/A/G 250 GAL PROPANE TANK No findings, conditions, or permissions found. SEP07-00284 MC MILLEN TRTEE P Application Received: 7/31/2007 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: No findings, conditions, or permissions found. Page I of 1 ParceI Print Page 1 of 1 Parcel Number: 921073020 05/14/2007 Owner Mailing Address: KENNETH A MC MILLEN TRTEE JEANNE M MC MILLEN TRTEE MCMILLEN REVOC TRUST 1734 OAK BAY RD PORT HADLOCK WA 983399726 Site Address: Section: 7 School District: Chimacum (49) Qtr Section: SW1/4 Fire Dist: Chimacum (1) Township: 29N Tax Status: Taxable Range: 1E Tax Code: 211 Planning area: Tri-Area (4) Sub Division: Land Use Code: 9100 - VACANT LAND Property Description: 57 T29 R1E I TAX 6 &TL TAX 0 I (S 100' OF EACH) I J No Photo Available • http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parcelprint.asp?PARCEL_NO=92... 2/20/2008 Map Output Page 1 of 3 Features not surve ed 1 921/82003 Mms wooded cry 'sal Cam= == =32 http:ligisserVer/seRIIet/WM.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServioeName=ovmap&ClientV... 2/20/2008 ix ti H O LJJ = O LU Ci LL Cu J L Z LL CC 0 H O ft CC O O 4- = NO .. .. � Q O m - Cu Cu J Z in O V — CO Q r L J a O O m C X CC LU U O O I- I LL- 0 LU 0 Z ++ -0 H C ) co Q A 7 2 L C U 00 r'---Q .O C) U U CC Z O 7 (:V C) J o [1 < X U 1- I- O J O CO O) 0) Cu N "O r- = O O') Q C.) W I , CC -p W W 0) L,i = C 7 3 I- L1 CO 3 I— I- O o CC 1- CO O O LLJ J C.) O I- CC CO O CC Z 2 F- I- C) C O Z F1 Z CO LU 3 LL) Z = 3 } Cu X J W 2 CC I- O r.., CO J J F- 3 O 1== O = W CO 11 J 0 C LU CO X U W J W X 41 C.) CC LU d Cr Q LU CO CC X 0 O O F- W I- Q Cs U 7 )- Y .. CC CC X \ CO X U CL CC C.) CO Cl Cu LU J Ll F- Q Q X CC CO O 0) - F- C7 F- Q J 0 J N CC Z W X Z Y 0 X dS - lL F- 2 W Q ¢ C.) W ,D 0) 17 J X LU I- LL J O 2 CC U Cu CO O -J F- a) J LU 2 J F- - I C) d Z Z F1 T' F- O X X N CO X Z CC X CO 2 CO Q CO 7 0- O LL LU U N O CD U) F- '--, U 'I", U Y X a X co — +-1 o C1 T O 7 Cu O O CO CO N O X Cu C.) CO X O O T O O O 'O L U 4) Cu CO 7) # C O E O) .. C- 3 L. * Y C - U) O +■ m C.) a) O) 7) N - 7) m L O) O co O) C > CO C) L L d — 0 CO Q L. U CO X +1 C.) "O X CO Cl) CL CO -- -- CO a) F- F- X cl- F- CO CO C4 X )E F- CC MLA08-00064 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Review Type: I Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 PERMIT #: BLD08-00065 Received Date: 2/15/2008 SITE ADDRESS: OAK BAY RD PORT HADLOCK, 98339 OWNER: KENNETH A MC MILLEN TRTEE PHONE: 360-385-0959 JEANNE M MC MILLEN TRTEE 1734 OAK BAY RD PORT HADLOCK WA 983399726 SUBDIVISION: Block: Lot: TX6+ PARCEL NUMBER: 921073020 Section: 7 Township: 29 N Range: 01 E CONTRACTOR: OWNER/BUILDER PHONE: REPRESENTATIVE: PHONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTIOI NEW SFR W/A/G 250 GAL PROPANE TANK TYPE OF WORK RES SQUARE FOOTAGE: TYPE OF IMP NEW MAIN: 1,263 VALUATION 273,359.00 ADD'L: 1,131 HEAT TYPE: PRO CODE EDITION: 2006 HEAT BASE: HEAT TYPE: OCCUPANCY: R-3 UNHEATED: 1,200 #OF STORIES: OCCUPANCY: OTHER: CONST TYPE: 5N GARAGE: SHORELINE: CONST TYPE: SETBACK: DECK: 1,120 BANK HEIGHT: SEWAGE DISPOSAL: WATER SYSTEM: PUD BEDROOMS: BATHROOMS: Exist: Exist: Prop: 3 Prop: 3 Total: 3 Total: 3 Routing Date: / 1 / Type Amount Paid By: Date: Receipt: Approved/Date Permit $1,968.15 CJZ 02/15/08 95799 Plan Check $1,279.30 CJZ 02/15/08 95799 State Building Code $4.50 CJZ 02/15/08 95799 Potable Water Application $59.00 CJZ 02/15/08 95799 Total: $3,310.95 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TIME SHEET KENNETH A MC MILLEN TRTEE MLA08-00064 Date Time Comments �3 . d t t I:\R_MLT_Case_CRMLA.rpt February 20,2008 • UDC CONSISTENCY REVIEW . • Pro;:ct P ilk:•ner: Master#MLA08-00064 Review Type Project Description BLD08-00065 I NEW SFR WI A/G 250 GAL PROPANE TANK I �� Primary: KENNETH A MC MILLEN TRTEE Site Address: / / JEANNE M MC MILLEN TRTEE ii�� OAK BAY RD 1734 OAK BAY RD �`O©� PORT HADLOCK WA, 98339 PORT HADLOCK WA 983399726 Project Location: Parcel Number 921 073 020, Section 7, Township 29, Range 1E, WM, Located on Oak Bay Road, Port Hadlock, WA 98339 Parcel Number: 921073020 S-T-R: 7-29N-01E Total Acreage: 1 Legal Description S7 T29 R1E TAX 6& TL TAX 0(S 100' OF EACH) Land Use: 9100 Flood District: Fire District: 1 Planning Area: 4 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: District: 49 Zoning: COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: a c l - COMMUNITY PLAN: UGAT MPR: WATER SUPPLY UTILITY: Service Area Ol444 PU [ ] Plot plan states "property line" „,, 4 Assessor's Map(Property li ubmitted plot plan must match the property lines as idenl ,__ Legal Access to Property ® NI t V �j• Parcel Tags or Scanned DocumentsA NO ! � I `)' vWA ie ESA's: Special Repo / Nearby YEV 0 — yr, Designated Ag ,�j A Shoreline Designation: lel O 6 U- cul, Q) 1 �� Shoreline Slope Stab' ' NO J Stream Type:YES (\f) Fish& Wildlife:Y s 0 - Wetlands: YE I to ✓ Rare Plants:YES NO (� Seismic: YET!_ r� �� J Landslide: YE J \J1 Flood: YE�w)/ ( \ Erosion: YES VP '1�1 Aquifer Recharge --rea:YES ilit _ SIPZ: none At Risk h Risk Coastal �11 Stormwater site p . to them: e No fa Forest Lands: YES Adjoining Forest Lan.s: : m- I/ Rural/ Inholding ] Stormwater:New Impervious Surface sr.,. ►'ilirai ... listurbing Activity 3t(7 0 ESA's Stormwater Req's: Min Req#2 ■in Req#1 thru ' Min Re 1 thru#10 Engineer' 41050 Notice Provisions/Disclosur Airport yes MI MRL YES NO Forest Lands YES No d ' Landscaping Required: Yes N MI/ Parking Spaces fired NO /2� Other or. Building Height. 35' UBC Standar Impervious Surface coverage percentage: aJ lo Resource Lands&Public: 10% Rural Residential: 25% Rural Industrial: Per UDC Sec 6.7 Rural Commercial: 60% C erage'60%in Rural Industrial Lands only Total Building(s) Size: a L �m. . RVC:20,000 SF CC:5,000 SF NC:7,500 SF GC: 10,008 it All others:subject to seplir.&water constraints/Non�gpecifi c [>Q' Setbacks: Front: 3(� Left Side: �c Right Side: �� Rear: q( rUY �OCr7 a//j) �/\Shoreline Setback:Setback. LSHA Setback: , in 4 /t q Road Classification: diegia 1r!�Li�,.► && 1 M- Vriet 7 (C l90 Road Approach:EXISTING .IT REQ'D • -P e. SEPA Required:YE <IMO Flood Certificate: Asia -Existing Case(s)& • .ition(s): SQL. la-d/OR/0 � Violations: Yes 0 -Recorded Date of S ..'vision: c) (j AFN Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions: Iv <Syrs=Plat Conditions • •e Old Ordinance Lots/Require Declaration of rictive Covenant YES NO, ubmitted: YES NO Site Visit conducted YE 0 ] Require Final Zoning Appro YES No ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan case N/A New Parcel Tags entered in P- it Plan 41p YEll Special Reports Scanned ; YES No parcel tags found for parcel Associated CASES status issued finaled description 121073020 M LA08-00064 BLD08-00065 P NEW SFR W/A/G 250 GAL PROPANE TANK SEP07-00284 4< 1(5i o sc�bd���l , ,t .7(3( i i C s 1 C I I WATTLE CASING IS A BIODEGRADABLE I" SQUARE STAKES DRIVEN THROUGH TUBULAR PLASTIC OR SIMILAR ENCASING WATTLE EVERY 3' - 4' MATERIAL 8" - 10" STRAW PLACE WATTLE IN 3" - 5" FILLED WATTLE DEEP TRENCH STRAW WATTLE — STANDARD STAKING NO SCALE NOTE: OVERLAP WATTLE SPLICES FOR URATION WHERE H HE CONTRACTORRDESIRES A MINIMUM OF 4 FEET. TO REUSE THE WATTLES WITHOUT NO BUTT JOINTS. DAMAGING THE CASING THE ALTERNATE A -FRAME STAKING METHOD SHOWN HERE MAY BE USED. STRAW WATTLE -- ALTERNATE STAKING NO SCALE TYP. BUIL DIM UND/STUI FOOTING DRAIN SPLASH BLOCK DISPERSION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE FILTER FABRIC, 0.85 oz /yd SPUN BOUND NYLON, OR LANDSCAPING CLOTH, AROUND ALL SIDES. VARIABLE SLOPE OR- __lllr Y, U z V) uN� W �+ d O z �a W Cn LLJ �C V � z ti MIN. VEGETATED FLOW PATH 0 ^ N ^ 4 " MIN. CRUSHED ROCK COVER 6" MIN. 1.5' /N FILL INFILTRATION GALLERY W/ 1 112" - 314" WASHED ORA/NROCK 4" PERFORATED PIPE INSTALLED LEVEL 2' RESIDENTIAL DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES NOTES. A. PRIOR TO STARTING LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES THE CLEARING LIMITS MUST BE MARKED, THE TREES WITHIN THE 1. INSTALL BASE OF INFILTRATION GALLERY LEVEL. CLEARING THAT WILL REMAIN MUST BE MARKED AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED. 2. SEE PLANS FOR LOCATION AND LENGTH. B. REVEGETA TE DISTURBED SLOPE AS NEEDED PRIOR TO REMOVING TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. DRIVEWAY INFILTRATION GALLERY C. ROOF RUNOFF SHALL DISPERSE ONTO SPLASH BLOCKS. A MAXIMUM OF 700 SF OF ROOF AREA TO EACH NOT TO SCALE DOWNSPOUT. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 50' OF VEGETATED FLOW PATH AFTER SPLASH BLOCKS. D. PRIOR TO REMOVING TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURE STABILIZE AND RE -SEED THE SITE AS NEEDED. E. SEE ATTACHED REPORT. F. VARIOUS INSPECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION: 1. EROSION CONTROL INSPECTION. 2. INTERIM INSPECTION, MAY BE REQUIRED. J. FINAL INSPECTION. i pj� I� V ;> v J y 3 Qr Q 1� �o W 0 o� W &W S%7w Q � rA N .� O v J �3 z W D Y W 2 V Q` Q� LZ )- c M. Wq�� Q W zz � W V 43230 F,O � N 3 ^ GISTER �' ' \� Q� A 41 cr /ONALENG can }Vvz M •• W m ^ .. z lJ33• C9 z Y CV tj V1 N 0 0 0 a (n APPROVED STORMWATER PLAN W! ) 0 2008 1EFFERSO 'O TY DEPT. OF c ti . [ vF OPME T I C. r ' "- tly `. _ Iop .;�• -- INSTALL WATTLE PRIOR TO BREAKING GROUND„.. -'' 2. CI WATTLE CASING IS A BI00EGRA0A8LE I" SCUARE STAKES DRIVEN THROUGH W'9ULAR PLASTIC OR SIMILAR ENCASING WATTLE EVERY X - 4' MATERIAL $ " - 10" STRAW PLACE WATTLE /N 3 " - 5 ., FILLED WATTLE DEEP TRENCH �\ Ef�///:E7 STANDARD -SrAKING .srRAW... wATrLE NO SCALE NOTE.- 0VERLAP WA TILE SPLICES FOR SHORT DURATION PRO ✓ECTS A MINIMUM OF 4 FEET. WHERE THE CONTRACTOR . DESIRES TO REUSE THE WATTLES WITHOUT NO 8U7-T JOINTS.- DAMAGING THF. CASING THE ALTERNATE A- f"RAME STAKING METHOD SHOWN HERE MAY BE USED. i STRAW WATTLE — ALTERNATE STAKING NO SCALE Ilk a LLJ cv, n LS ck- • N� A 1 t a L's / 6 cyl tf to , ;� �.:.- - -- 0 30 60 r g �, , '• SCALE IN FEET { ,- 1 I j c y v qcN' y..:..�..'T:.YRr:.,M 4t':a✓"SLY dk..%,Y!I`.:H1.y::Cn4aK.''n. .. ` V!> A S, /Q Vol y 9 eb- �� ( ' "„" / , s;. ryasewwcxmaabtaw�u. �aM. 4iwai, n. wn. usacw+' u1x. wwu. rw. oM :waN'�.Yw�wrgi:cgrtitw.yrsr,g, -S J •n � � � � (�� � ...,�., nay A' b._ ',. ° %ro ref .,F''` @xy. � ^'" .;. / /' J F 1 ,[(I �,e T� /` �t• iA { •�' /jam....- ' � p ffffff� �i i''& svfm A vo "F. �' � ...r_ / / .,•cr' ` / �r ... J � J { �A.'A� e C ..r � `� � �� C.a' �.! � `"� � ��ry �'" J Y ,�•�� *:,ea ��'.a � � � �" � 1 � �✓ �� E fi PESIDtNTIAL DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES A. PRIOR TO STARTING LAND DISTURBING ACFA/771ES THE CLEARING LIMITS MUST BE MARkEO, THE TREES WITHIN THE CLEARING THAT WILL REMAIN MUST BE MARKED AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED. B. REVEGETATE DISTURBED SLOPE AS NEEDED PRIOR TO REMOVING TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. C: ROOF RUNOFF SHALL DISPERSE ONTO SPLASH BLOCKS. A MAXIMUM OF 700 SF OF ROOF AREA TO EACH DOWNSPOUT. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 50' OF l EGETATEO FLOW PATH AFTER SPLASH BLOCKS. D. PRIOR TO REMOVING TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURE STABILIZE AND ME-SEED ME SITE AS NEEDED. E. SEE ATTACHED REPORT. F. VARIOUS INSPECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION: 1. EROSION CONTROL INSPECTION. 2. INTERIM INSPECTION, MAY BE REQUIRED. 3, FINAL INSPECTION. 1 Ile— in ' �f.•I _f � a 0 V w Q �o w blj o� © U Wzz U N Q N IX Z o °g tog Z m .. _ ' irl 0 0 V LY V w y �� L— A fi Ile— in ' �f.•I _f � a 0 V w Q �o w blj o� © U Wzz U N Q N IX Z o °g tog Z m .. _ ' irl 0 0 V LY LEGEND `L r7G / \GV /Y Jf7HLL MGI\VG V/\ VG !IY !GV/\H /GlJ !IY /V H04 I FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF PARCELS OWNED BY THE PROPONENTS. NOR DOES THE BOUNL O SET 518 INCH DIAMETER REBAR & IDENTIFICATION CAP "A. WOOD PLS 23911" RESULT IN ANY LOTS, TRACTS, PARCELS, OR DIWSIO A & B BEFORE AND AFTER THE B. L.A. I AREA AND DIMENSION TO MEET MINIMUM COUNTY, A, 00 FOUND MONUMENT (AS NOTED). FOR WIDTH AND AREA FOR A BUILDING SITE. I D AND THE STATEMENT TEMENT OF INTENT, SEE ❑ FOUND 5 8" REBAR AND CAP "NT7- NESARY LS 22344" `J n 1NlS AREA LOCH TED FROM SET'STEEL FENCE POST AS PROPERTY LINE MARKER NOTES TO POTENTIAL PURCHAS O o Z A. f . N. ----------------------- FOUND 1/2 /N. DIA. REBAR AND CAP "FISCHER LS 21445" RECORD PLAN ON FILE KI TH A p JEFFERSON COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL v o HEALTH PER PERMIT 7591 SL-3 SOIL, TEST/ INVESTIGA TION SI TE (SEP71 -161). AND WAS PROSCRIP77VEL Y NOR TH LINE OF SOUTH 100' CREATED 09171 BY MUTUAL ACQUIESENCE OF GOVT LOT 4 SET /8" REBAR FOR SURVEY CONTROL STATIONS I a 86 \ OF EACH ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER POWER /UTILITY POLE (LOCHT70N AS MAPPED) AND THE INSTALLATION THEREOF. QD pp -� "E GOV LOT �oXo� QA S88 35 50 \ \ tv 2.41 1 q 6.83' 119 1? \ \�C� ��� 124 0 7x.25' S88 °35'50 "E 120 515.13' 1 21 1 I t 22 PP F `2� 1 \ 9 N 91.82' SL -3 68.03' 107.14' ° ,N 343.24' l 80.37 23 43.15' -:. N N ,� ` o \ 41.54' 171.89 PROPOSED TREA TMEN T / cn ROAD ° » Z t ° \ X ROAD EDGE n � ►�? S88 J5'50 E o N FIELD DISTRIBURON r ` EDGE \' \ (TYPICAL) O AREA (RESERVE) � SL-2 \ \ SL-4 (TYPICAL) � 1 � � � <D h N PROPOSED TANK TREATMENT \0 W 'lop X \\ \\ PUMP AND OISIRIBU710N CTR. \' 85 9 SL Z NORTHWEST CORNER OF SL -1 / PUMP HOUSE I N N \� tyj o Z' GOVERNMENT LOT 1, \ S88 '35'50 "E 545.87' 1 SECTION 18. 51.83'. 83 PREVIOUS BOUNDARY LINE _ _ _ _ ' HOUSE SEC. 7 7° 415 85.25— 231.11 ' _'" — — p "E 82 PP 84 87.14 r 127.26, `�- CALC: M. C. �,� SEC. 1 i ZD 60.36' 10 8 > PROPOSED TREA TMEN T X %�EL I N 15.11 ' -'a i --+ PAR V ~ X FIELD .DISTRIBUT70N SL -5 'UND O rn SL--6 AREA (PRIMARY) piL, g o Cn � 5 J'iF�� �, PARCEL _ O cn ��,,\o H YC 2.19 ACRES Ul c `-� >m O �. o. �(P l GL.) N 0 F AFTER BLA N 0 1.42 ACRES AFTER BLA B D� (EXCLUSI VE OF b c o '0 0 1911011 EXISTING WELL oo N �0 (CAL CULA TED ONL Y TO MEANDER LINE) >�`` a lu N R� /5��� P N' TO BE USED FOR CO. RD. ROWS) �• A N �`� IRRIGA T70N ONLY! ;v o ;v �� SEE DETAIL aa, °oo NORTHERLY LIMI TS CLAIMED BY . \ Z -o ' m x vi v THIS AREA oo. o, `� MARC MAUNEY SURVEY N. T1- o tv ON SHEET 2 RONALD L. NESARY L.S 22344) uvir OF 2 SHEETS VOLUME 21 OF NORTHERLY LIMITS CLAIMED BY MARC MAUNEY SURVEY o Q' SURVEYS, PAGE (N. T. % RONALD L. NESARY L.S 22344) 'cri �6)- RECORDS OF JEFFERSON COUN T Y, O� Q P 00 � _ _ WASHINGTON. VOLUME 21 PAGE 139 OF SURVEYS 46.37' � 5•�0 � ACCESS 20.00' S��O• EASEMENT TO RESERVE AREA Of ...-.. .,..— ..,_...._.._......._ - - - - -- -- OLD FENCE LINE & CLAIMED OC125 C LINE 20.00' 20.00' 127.37 ' S86 °37'56 A ' OLD FENCE LINE &CLA /MED OCCUPA 7TON S86 37'56 "E , l� L� D MAY JEFFERS( DEPT. OF COMP- 11 --.o �• •` LINE � N 0.00' �` o a // // 34 4.05' 20.00. NEW BOUNDARY LINE (PL RMED USING 3 p, o0 3 �, PARCEL C S86 ° -- S86 37;56 "E 258.99 >'ODS y OLD FENCE L /NE & ONE INTENTION OF THIS 0( 37 56 E" — IS TO RECONCILE THE Ot N/C n ao 9.14 ACRES AFTER BLA BY EACH PROPERTY 010 a � CLAIMED OCC. LINE 630.40 OLD FENCE LINE & .CLA /MED OCCUPA T /ON LINE AND -� - (EAST OF COUNTY RD. ROWS) AL TERNA TE POS/770N OF OR/G. PROP. LIMITS n OF. McM/LLEN- MAUNEY PROPERTIES BASED A.P.N.921 -182 -012 EXCEEDS D Z MARC MAUNEY SURVEY BY NTl - NESARY LS 22344 'VEYING o VOLUME 21 PAGE 1.39 OF SURVEYS UPON REVIEW OF "SENIOR"- "JUNIOR" DEED \ IJO -090 v G. L (PER AUDITORS FILE NUMBER 114458) �-! • ' ISSUE RAISED BY NESARY. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE. BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CI1Ri /FV RFrORNNO ArT AT T14F RFOIIFST OFD N. SURVEY INDEXING INFORMATION,-. GOVERNMENT LOT 4 (SESW) SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 1 EAST, ..- • • rtrnm� 1.r T1TTT • 17 11TTl - JOB NUMBER. J80 SHE WOOD SURVEY