HomeMy WebLinkAboutCPA99-00015 {
APPLICATION PACKET
FOR
AMENDMENTS TO THE JEFFERSON COUNTY
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Submittal deadline: Friday July 16, 1999
Please return completed applications to the Jefferson County Permit Center,
621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368
JEFFERSON COUNTY
Department of Community Development, Long Range Planning Division
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3
TYPES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS 3
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN AMENDMENTS 4
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 5
JEFFERSON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT APPLICATION 6
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT QUESTIONNAIRE 7
OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATION FORM 3
2
APP-FORM2.doc 05/12,99
•
AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan addresses long-range and County-wide issues that are beyond
the scope of decisions on subarea and local plans or individual development proposals. The Plan serves
as a vital guide for the future and provides a framework for managing change. It is important that
amendments to the Comprehensive Plan retain the broad perspectives articulated in the community vision
statements, satisfy the goals, policies, and strategies of the Plan. and remain consistent with the intent of
the Growth Management Act.
TYPES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
Five types of amendments are identified in the Comprehensive Plan:
1. Policy Amendments address the addition or deletion of policies or changes to policies already
included within the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Map Amendments address changes to designations illustrated on the Comprehensive Land Use
Map. These land use designations are intended to be long-term and unchanging. Land use
designations may be subject to minor refinements, but only after full public participation, notice,
environmental review, and an official assessment of growth management indicators.
3. General Amendments address a policy or land use designation applied to a broad class of
situations and to a large number of parcels and persons that are not readily identifiable.
4. Site-Specific Amendments address a policy or land use designation that is applied to a specific
number of parcels in a readily identifiable ownership. A proposal which formulates policy yet
affects relatively few individuals will generally be characterized as a site-specific action.
S. Emergency Amendments address situations that necessitate expeditious action to preserve the
health, safety or welfare of the public or to support the social, economic or environmental well
being of the county or region. The emergency amendment process may also be used to process
an amendment for the purpose of resolving an appeal of the comprehensive plan filed with the
growth management hearings board or the court. Emergency amendments may only be initiated
by the Board of County Commissioners.
3
APP-FORM2.doc 05/12/99
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan must conform to the following:
a. The requirements of the Washington State Growth Management Act, Chapter RCW
36.70A and the State Planning Enabling Act, Chapter RCW 36.70. Proposed amendments
must be consistent with applicable federal, state, and local laws, the Comprehensive Plan,
the County-wide Planning Policy, related plans, and the comprehensive plans of other
counties or cities with which the County has, in part, common borders or regulated
regional issues (WAC 365-195-630[1]).
b. Proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan will be considered on an annual basis
(no more frequently than once per year), except when the following circumstances apply:
(i) the initial adoption of a subarea plan, and (ii) the adoption or amendment of a
shoreline master program pursuant to RCW 90.58. All proposals will be considered
concurrently so the cumulative effect of the various proposals can be ascertained (WAC
365-195-630[2]). The County may consider adopting amendments more frequently than
once per year if a declared emergency exists.
c. Amendments or changes to natural resource lands and critical area designations should be
based on consistency with one or more of the following criteria:
• Change in circumstances pertaining to the Comprehensive Plan or public policy.
• A change in circumstances beyond the control of the landowner pertaining to the
subject property. ' •
• An error in designation.
• New information on natural resource land or critical area status (WAC 365-190-
040[2][g]).
4
APP-FORN12.doc 05/12/99
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
What is a Comprehensive Plan amendment?
Comprehensive Plan amendments address general or site-specific land use designation changes or textual changes to
the narrative or goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. These amendments are addressed on an annual basis
(no more frequently than once per year). The deadline for submittal of Comprehensive Plan amendment
applications for the 1999 amendment cycle is July 16, 1999.
How many applications may I submit to amend the Comprehensive Plan?
Applications may be submitted for each specific amendment requested.
What if I submit an incomplete application?
Incomplete applications will be returned. Applicants may wish to contact the Department of Community
Development, Long Range Planning Division before applying in order to discuss amendment application
requirements and procedures.
Are fees required for Comprehensive Plan Amendments?
All applications for site-specific Comprehensive Plan map amendments must be accompanied by a$250.00 fee.
What is included in a complete application?
A completed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application will include:
1. A completed application form(page 6 of this packet).
2. Answers to the questionnaire entitled Comprehensive Plan Amendment Questionnaire(page 7 of
this packet).
3. For site-specific applications, a $250.00 application fee.
4. For site-specific applications, an assessor's map o)'the subject property.
5. For site-specific applications,a notarized ownership certificate(page 3L of this packet).
6. For site-specific applications,a completed State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)checklist.
II
5
APP-FORM2.doc 05/12/99
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Case #
Proponent: South B.y Community Association
Address: c/o Olympic Resource Management: P.O Box 1780. Poulsbo. WA 98370
Telephone: 360-697-6626
Authorized Representative/Contact: Jon Rose, P.E. Olympic Property Group LLC
Address: c/o Olympic Resource Management: P.O Box 1780. Poulsbo, WA 98370
Date Checklist Prepared: July 14. 1999
PROPOSAL AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Proposed Project Name:
The Bay Club Comprehensive Plan Amendment—Map Amendment/Map Correction
Proposed Project Description:
This application is a map amendment/map correction to correct an'erroneous
Comprehensive Plan designation for the Bay Club from Multifamily, MPR-MF to Resort
Complex Community Facilities, MPR-RC/CF. The current designation, Multifamily,
MPR-MF does not reflect the actual, developed use of the 10.58 acre site.
The Resort Complex/Community Facilities (MPR-RC/CF) designation more accurately
conforms to the actual, developed use of the property. The Bay Club is a community
recreation facility serving the South Bay Community Association. It includes
community meeting facilities, woodshop, craft room, swimming pool, social area,
exercise, pool tables, card room, kitchen facilities, and a community trail.
Residential uses do not exist on, nor are they planned for, the site.
The Beach Club is another nearby community recreation facility serving a different set of
users, which are the residents of North Bay. The Beach Club serves a similar function as
the Bay Club and is currently designated as MPR-RC/CF.
Property and Area Description:
Address: 120 Spinnaker Place, Port Ludlow, WA
Legal: NE1/4 of SE1/4 of Section 17, Twp. 28 N, R1E
Subdivision N/A
Tax Parcel: 821174005
Quarter Sections: SE
Section-Township-Range Section 17, Twn 28N, R1E
Land Area(dimensions): Approx. 10.58 acres
Describe the location, physical characteristics, and extent of land area to be affected:
include all factors that will give an accurate understanding of the property and its
environment:
The property is located within the Port Ludlow Master Planned Resort in Port Ludlow,
Washington. The property is approximately 10.58 acres in size and has been developed
with the Bay Club, a community recreation facility. The site includes the Bay Club
building, lawn, parking, landscape, and natural areas. There is also a trail and gazebo
overlooking Ludlow Bay.
The property is located at the east end of Spinnaker Lane on the western shores of
Ludlow Bay.
Schedule:
Not applicable. This is a non-project application.
Overall Plan:
Not applicable. This is a non-project application.
Required Approvals:
Approval is sought from Jefferson County for a map amendment/map correction to the
Comprehensive Plan due to a mapping error.
Environmental Data:
No new environmental data has been gathered for this current proposal.
By reference this application incorporates all the environmental data contained in
Jefferson County's EIS prepared for their adopted Comprehensive Plan.
By reference this application incorporates all the prior environmental studies prepared for
the building permit of the Bay Club.
By reference this application incorporates all the environmental documentation contained
in the Draft and Final EIS for the Port Ludlow Development Program.
By reference this application incorporates all the environmental documentation contained
in the Draft and Final EIS for the Inn at Port Ludlow.
2
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMENTS
EARTH EVALUATION
1. Check the item that describes the site:
[X]flat [ [rolling [x[hilly [ [steep slopes
2. What is the steepest slope on the site: Identify the approximate
percent of the slope:
Over 20% at the waterfront portions of the site.
3. What general types of soils are found on the site (sand, gravel,
peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,
specify them and note any prime farmland:
Soil types are not known.
4. Are these surface indications or a history of unstable soils in the
immediate vicinity? If so, describe them:
Not to our knowledge.
5. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any
filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
None for this non-project action.
6. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use?
If so,generally describe it.
No. This is a non-project action.
7. About what percent of the site would be covered with
impervious surfaces after construction of the project (that is,
asphalt or buildings)?
Not applicable. This proposal will not result in the creation of new
impervious surfaces.
3
EARTH(continued) EVALUATION
8. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control erosion or
other impacts to the earth, if any:
None for this non-project action.
AIR
9. What types of emissions to the air, if any, would result from the
proposal during construction and when the project is completed
(dust, car odors, industrial wood smoke)? Generally describe
and give approximate quantities,if known:
None for this non-project action.
10. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odors that may
affect your proposal? If so,generally describe them:
None for this non-project action.
11. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or
other impacts to the air,if any:
None for this non-project action.
4
WATER EVALUATION
Surface Water
12. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity
of the site, including year-round or seasonal streams,salt waters,
lakes, ponds, and wetlands? If yes, describe the type and
provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it
flows into:
The project lies on the west shore of Ludlow Bay.
13. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to the
described waters(within 200 feet)? If yes,describe the work and
attach available plans:
None for this non-project action.
14. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be
placed or removed from the surface waters or wetlands and
indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Identify the
source of the fill material:
None for this non-project action.
15. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or
diversions? Give a general description and identify the purpose
and approximate quantities,if known:
None for this non-project action.
16. Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so,
note the location on the site plan:
The portions directly adjacent to Ludlow Bay lie within a 100 year
flood plain.
17. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to
surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge:
None for this non-project action.
5
GROUND WATER EVALUATION
18. Will ground water be withdrawn or will water be discharged to
ground water? Give a general description and identify the
purpose and approximate quantities,if known:
None for this non-project action.
19. Describe the waste material that would be discharged into the
ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (domestic
sewage; industrial wastes and chemicals contained; agricultural
wastes). Describe the general size of the system; the number of
such systems; the number of houses to be served, if applicable,
or the number of animals or humans the system(s) is expected to
serve:
None for this non-project action.
WATER RUN-OFF
(including storm water)
20. Describe the source of run-off, including storm water. Describe
the method of collection and disposal, if any, including any
known quantities. Where will this water flow? Will this water
flow into other waters? If so,describe it:
None for this non-project action.
21. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,
generally describe how:
None for this non-project action.
22. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control surface,
ground,and run--off water impacts,if any:
None for this non-project action.
PLANTS
23. Check the types of vegetation found on the site;
Deciduous tree: [ x]alder [x ]maple [ ]aspen
[ ]other: Typical residential landscaping
Evergreen tree: [x]fir [ x]cedar [ ]pine
[ ]other:
[x]Shrubs [x]Grass [ ]Pasture [ ]Crop/Grain
6
PLANTS (continued) EVALUATION
Wet Soil Plants: [ ]cattail [ ]buttercup [ ]bulrush
[ ]shunk cabbage
[ [other:
Water Plants: [ ]water lily [ ]eelgrass [ ]milfoil
[jollier:
Other: Plants associated with the shoreline of Ludlow Bay
24. What kind and amount of vegetation would be removed or
altered?
None for this non-project action.
25. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near
the site:
None to our knowledge.
26. Describe the proposed landscaping, use of nature plants, or
other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if
any:
None for this non-project action.
ANIMALS
27. Check any birds and animals that have been observed on or
near the site or are known to be on or near the site:
Birds: [x ]hawk [ x ]heron [ x ]eagle [ ]songbirds
[ [other:
Mammals: I [deer [ [elk [ [beaver
[ ]other: Squirrels
Fish: [ ]bass [x]salmon [ ]trout [ ]herring [xlshellfish
[ [other: Typical saltwater species
28. List any threatened or endangered species to be on or near the
site:
Eagles and hawks are known to frequent the Port Ludlow area.
There are no known nest trees in the vicinity of this proposal.
7
ANIMALS (continued) EVALUATION
29. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,how?
Not to our knowledge.
30. Describe proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if
any:
None for this non-project action.
ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
31. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove,
solar) would be used to meet the completed project's energy
needs? Describe whether it would be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc.:
None for this non-project action. The existing homes will use
electricity for heating and other typical residential needs.
32. Would the project affect the potential use of solar energy by
adjacent properties? If so,generally describe the affect:
No
33. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the
plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce
or control energy impacts,if any:
None for this non-project action.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
34. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure
to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous
waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,
describe the hazards:
Not to our knowledge
35. Describe special emergency services that might be required:
None for this non-project action.
36. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control environmental
health hazards, if any:
None for this non-project action.
8
NOISE
37. What types of noise exist in the area that may affect your project
(traffic,equipment,operation)?
Traffic from Paradise Bay Road generates noise that should not be a
factor from this non-project action.
38. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated
with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis
(construction, traffic, operation)? Indicate what hours noise
would come from this site:
None for this non-project action.
39. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,
if any:
None for this non-project action.
LAND AND SHORELINE USE
40. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
The property is developed as a community recreation facility.
There are existing and proposed condominiums (Inner Harbor
Condominiums) that lie along the western and portions of the
northern and southern boundaries.
The shores of Ludlow Bay lie along the eastern, and portions of the
northern and southern boundaries.
41. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe the use:
Not to our knowledge.
42. Describe any structures on the site:
The Bay Club, a community recreation facility along with associated
parking and other infrastructure.
43. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what structures?
No.
9
LAND AND SHORELINE USE EVALUATION
44. What is the current comprehensive plan or community
development plan designation of the site? Identify the plan:
MPR-MF - Master Planned Resort Multifamily
45. If applicable, what is the current Shoreline Master Program
designation of the site?
Suburban
46. Has any part of the site been classified as "environmentally
sensitive" area. If so,specify the part:
The shoreline of Ludlow Bay.
47. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the
completed project?
None
48. Approximately how many people would the completed project
displace?
None.
49. Describe proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement
impacts, if any:
None
50. Describe proposed measures to ensure the proposal is
compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if
any:
The purpose of this proposal is to make the Comprehensive Plan
compatible with the existing development.
HOUSING EVALUATION
51. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any?
Indicate whether the housing is high,middle, or low income:
None under this non-action proposal.
10
HOUSING (continued) EVALUATION
52. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated?
Indicate whether the housing is high, middle,or low income:
None.
53. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control housing
impacts,if any:
None.
AESTHETICS
54. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not
including antennas? What is the principal exterior building
material(s) proposed?
None under this non-action proposal.
55. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or
obstructed?
None.
56. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic
impacts,if any:
None.
LIGHT AND GLARE
57. What type of light or glare would the proposal produce? What
time of the day would it mainly occur?
None for this non-project action.
58. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard
or interfere with views?
No.
59. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your
proposal?
None.
11
60. Describe proposed measure to reduce or control light and glare
impacts, if any:
None.
RECREATION EVALUATION
61. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in
the immediate vicinity?
The Bay Club itself, a community trail system, Port Ludlow Marina,
Port Ludlow Resort,Port Ludlow Golf Course,Heron Beach Inn.
62. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational
uses? If so,describe the displacement:
None.
63. Describe the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on
recreation, including recreational opportunities to be provided
by the project or proponent, if any:
None.
HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
64. Are there any places or objects listed on or proposed for
national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or
next to the site? If so,generally describe them.
Not to our knowledge.
65. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic,
cultural, archaeological, or scientific importance known to be on
or next to the site:
Several archeological sites have been documented in the area. Refer
to the Draft and Final EIS for the Port Ludlow Inn and the Port
Ludlow Development Program.
66. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if
any:
None.
12
TRANSPORTATION EVALUATION
67. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and
describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on
site plat.
The Bay Club is access from a private road, Spinnaker Place.
Spinnaker Place connects to the public road system at Paradise Bay
Road.
68. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the
approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?
Jefferson Transit has stops along Paradise Bay Road.
69. How many parking spaces would the completed project have?
How many would the project eliminate?
This non-project action will not neither create or displace any
parking spaces.
70. Will the proposal require any new roads, streets, or
improvements to existing roads or streets, not including
driveways? If so, generally describe them, indicating whether
they are public or private:
No.
71. Will the project use water,rail, or air transportation, or occur in
the immediate vicinity of these facilities? If so, generally
describe the use:
No.
72. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the
completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes
would occur:
None for this non-project action.
73. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control transportation
impacts, if any:
None for this non-project action.
13
PUBLIC SERVICES EVALUATION
74. Would the project result in an increased need for public services
(fire protection, police protection, health care, schools)? If so,
generally describe the results:
No.
75. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts
on public services, if any:
None for this non-project action.
UTILITIES
76. Check which utilities are currently available at the site:
[ xlwater [x]electricity [ ]natural gas [x]refuse service
[x [telephone [ [septic system [x]sanitary sewer
[ xlother: cable television
77. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project,the utility
providing the service, and the general construction activities on
the site or in the immediate vicinity that might be needed:
None for this non-project action.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I acknowledge that all information provided in this checklist and all attached material is true and correct
to the best of my knowledge. I understand the lead agency is relying on this information to make its
decision. In addition, I understand that review under SEPA does not constitute approval or a proposal;
compliance with local, state, and federal regulations applicable to the proposal shall constitute approval.
(Check with appropriate agencies to determine what approvals are required.) SEPA approval is based on
the informatio at I have pro ided. If found inaccurate, approval could be withdrawn.
I r
(authorized si ature) (date)
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
FEE RECEIPT# CHECK# DATE INITIALS
14
CPA qck- 000 ( c
Long Range Planning Division
Staff Report
To
Board of County Commissioners
August 23, 1999
Re: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application
File Number: CPA99-i'
Applicant: Olympic Property Group
APPLICATION:
The request is to amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map, through the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Process, in order to change the zoning of the subject parcel from MPR-MF to MPR-RC/CF.
PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The site is the location of the Bay Club, a community recreation facility serving the South Bay
Community Association. The proponent states that residential uses do not exist on the site, nor are they
planned for the site. Staff concurs that this appears to be a mapping error. The zone of MPR-MF does not
reflect the existing development pattern.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A: Staff report
Attachment B: Application submitted by Olympic Property Group
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Legal Description:Tax 6 and TL tax D(LS D1, D2, D3)
Parcel numbers: 821174 005 Section 17, Township 28 North, Range 1 East, WM located at 120
Spinnaker Place The parcel is 10.58 acres in is and is bordered by Ludlow Bay on two sides.
Land Use Classification:
The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan identifies the subject parcels as MPR-MF.
Current Use of the Property:
The property is currently the site of the Bay Club.
PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Land Use and Rural policy 1.5.3 defines mapping errors:
Mapping errors that are clearly erroneous based on inaccurate information or technical error on the part of
the County may be corrected at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. Map corrections of
this nature shall not require a Comprehensive Plan amendment.
The mapping of the location of the Bay Club as multi-family seems to have been clearly erroneous based
on inaccurate information.
Staff recommends that the application be treated as a map correction,that the property be treated similarly
to Kehele Park in that although it is zoned MPR-RC/CF the permitted uses be limited to Community
Organization Activity Facilities and Recreation Center/Club and that the Comprehensive Plan amendment
fee be refunded in its entirety.
It
- I � -41-✓ e4"4 t Virg,
pa ,
/0,6 RC/CF USE CHART CQ/l D✓4n 4h
USES RC/CF RC/CF `—"�
_ Resort Area Kehele Park
Hotels(Inn) and appropriate associated uses ✓
Conference Center/Banquet Facility ✓
Parks and Trails as part of a platting or development review process ✓ ✓
Recreation Center/Club/Yacht Club ✓ ✓
Restaurant/Lounge/Bar ✓
Marina ✓
Seaplane Dock C
Helipad for Medical Emergencies Only C
Resort Related Retail Use ✓
Library/Museum ✓
Interpretive and Informational Kiosks ✓
Community Organization Activity Facilities, e.g. LMC Beach club and ✓
RV storage properties
Multifamily and Single Family Residential Structures (10 du/ac) ✓
Tennis Courts (indoor or outdoor) ✓ ✓
Amphitheater ✓
CHART INTERPRETATION: a✓ means a use is permitted; "C"
means conditional use approval is required.
3.403 Non-Resort Uses and Properties: Those non-resort controlled uses and activities which
currently exist within the RC/CF zone are recognized as valid uses and activities and may continue,
expand, or change in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance. These non-resort uses,
activities, and properties are not regulated by the provisions for the Resort Plan as set forth in section
3.90.
Section 3.404 Height Restrictions: No building or structure shall be erected, enlarged or
structurally modified to exceed 35 feet in height, excluding roof projections, as measured by UBC
standards, except that Hotels and associated Conference Center facilities, as specified in the Resort
Plan (see section 3.90) may be allowed to a height not exceeding 50 feet as measured by UBC
standards when the Jefferson County Fire District (#3) fords that fire-fighting and life safety issues
have been adequately addressed.
Section 3.405 Bulk and Dimensional Requirements: Bulk and dimensional requirements for
commercial uses in the MPR-RC/CF zone are contained in the table below. Single family residential
uses are subject to the requirements of section 3.10; provided that conditional use approval shall not
be required for single family attached development . Multi-family uses and structures are subject to
the requirements of section 3.30.
TABLE MPR-RC/CF
Density Minimum Minimum Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Maximum Impervious
Lot Area Lot Width Setback Setback Setback Coverage
N/A N/A N/A UBC UBC UBC 50%
MEDIATION GROUP MPR RECOMND 10
07/18/99
JEFC000 Jefferson County 07/13/1999
Our Inv Your by# Inv Date Inv Amount Amt Paid Discount Taken Net Amount
062006 Comp Plan Amend U'7/12/1999 250.00 250. 00 250.00
059329
JEFFERSON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION FORM
[Please Print]
Applicant/Contact: Olympic Property Group - Jbn Rose, P.E.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1780
City: Poulsbo State: WA Zi p' 9837, —
Type of Amendment
t `u C I a osed:
Phone: 360-697-6626 Fax: 360-697-1156 n C
Poli .
Owner: South Bay Community -Association JUL 16 m nt ✓
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1780 Ma
City: Poulsbo State: WA Zip: 9837,
PERMITCENTE1 mendm nt ✓ X
General •
Phone: 360-697-6626 Fax: 360-697-1156 Amendment ✓
Site-Specific
Site Address: Spinnaker Place Amendment ✓
City: Port Ludlow Zip: 98365
Parcel#: 821174005 Lot Size: 10.58 Acres Map
Section: 17 Township: 28N Range: 1E
Correction ✓ X
Is the property in a special taxation or land-use program?
X No Yes(specify) Ak `_
Applicant Signature: �r'*A d _ Date: �`Z
Jon Rig P.E.
Current Comprehensive Plan Land Use/Zoning I esignation:
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Rural Village Center Village Commercial Center
• _Convenience Crossroad _General Crossroad - Date
Neighborhood Visitor Crossroad
Rural Residential 1:5 _Rural Residential 1:10 • . Received:
_Rural Residential 1:20
Heavy Industrial _Light Industrial V
Assessor's Map: ✓
Light Industrial,Commercial
_Forest Resource Based Industrial Zone _Agricultural •
_Rural Forest _Commercial Forest _Inholding Forest Questionnaire: ✓
Mineral Parks,Preserves,and Recreation
_MPR-SF-IX MPR-MF _MPR-RC/CF Ownership Certificate: ✓ ✓
MPR-VC_MPR-SFT MPR-OSR
_M _
PR-RA OTHER SEPA Checklist ✓ 1./-
Requested Comprehensive Plan Land Use/Zoning Designation:
Application Complete: ✓
Rural Village Center _Village Commercial Center
Convenience Crossroad _General Crossroad
Neighborhood Visitor Crossroad
_Rural Residential 1:5 Rural Residential 1:10 n
_Rural Industrial al 1:20 �� 1 1— I ,'
Heavy Industrial _Light Industrial 1 1
Light industrial/Commercial
_Forest Resource Based Industrial Zone Agricultural �srue ,:v rat F.�,za..,r„ ,s,.n,c•, x,eva+zvmsgrivra ,sm+a�*v .y+.�.a-;!
Rural Forest _Commercial Forest _Inholding Forest Fee: 1 Mineral Parks.Preserves,and Recreation
_MPR-SF _MPR-MF XMPR-RCCF i
MPR-VC_MPR-SFT _MPR-OSR 7•00 Amount /(p/° Receipt# 6I'2-C eck./Cash
MPR-RA OTHER G •
111 /ate((e Paid Not Applicable
6
APP-FORM2.doc 05/12/99
•
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
On a separate sheet of paper, please respond to each question in as much detail as possible. Answer all
questions separately and reference the question number in your answer. An application will be
considered incomplete until all applicable questions are answered. This questionnaire applies to policy
amendments, map amendments, general amendments, and site-specific amendments.
1. Please provide a detailed statement of what is proposed and why. If this is a policy amendment
indicate the Comprehensive Plan section subject to the amendment and the text change proposed.
2. Has there been a change in circumstances pertaining to the Comprehensive Plan, public policy, or
(if applicable) the subject property beyond the control of the landowner?
3. What do you anticipate to be the impacts caused by the change, including the geographic area
affected and the issues presented?
4. For policy amendments only, state why existing Comprehensive Plan policies should not continue
to be in effect or why existing policies no longer apply.
5. How would the proposal comply with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive
Plan?
6. How would this proposal affect implementing land-use regulations (i.e. zoning)? What changes
would be necessary to bring the implementing land-use regulations into compliance with the
Comprehensive Plan?
7. For map amendments only, describe how the proposed map change complies with land-use
designation criteria in the Comprehensive Plan.
8. For Urban Growth Area Boundary changes only, demonstrate how your proposal will be
supported by and dependant on population forecasts and allocated urban population distributions,
existing urban densities and infill opportunities, phasing and availability of adequate services,
proximity to designated natural resource lands and the presence of critical areas.
7
APP-FORN12.doc 05/12/99
Bay Club
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Questionnaire
July 14, 1999
1. This Comprehensive Plan Application is a map amendment/map correction to correct
an erroneous Comprehensive Plan designation for the Bay Club. The current
designation, Multifamily, MPR-MF does not reflect the actual, developed use of the
10.58 acre site.
The Resort Complex/Community Facilities (MPR-RC/CF) designation more
accurately conforms to the actual, developed use of the property. The Bay Club is a
community recreation facility serving the South Bay Community Association. It
includes community meeting facilities, woodshop, craft room, swimming pool, social
area, exercise,pool tables, card room,kitchen facilities, and a community trail.
Residential uses do not exist, nor are they planned for the site.
The Beach Club is another nearby community recreation facility serving a different
set of users, which are the residents of North Bay. The Beach Club serves a similar
function as the Bay Club and is currently designated as MPR-RC/CF.
2. The only change in circumstances outside the control of the property owners is the
designation of the property as Multifamily, MPR-MF, in the Jefferson County
Comprehensive Plan.
3. We anticipate that there will be no impacts on the subject parcel or surrounding
properties. This amendment will only serve to better recognize the existing,
developed use.
4. Not applicable.
5. This request merely complies with Jefferson County's desire to provide development
regulations that recognize and are compatible with existing development.
Further, the change will support Comprehensive Plan Goal OSG 4.0:
Develop and maintain park and recreational facilities that are responsive to the
needs and interest of Jefferson County residents and visitors.
6. The proposal would have minimal impacts on implementing regulations. The only
revision would be to insure the County's zoning map and development regulations are
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
•
7. The proposal does not create any inconsistencies or conflicts with Comprehensive
Plan policies or designation criteria. It only serves to match the actual, developed use
with a more appropriate Comprehensive Plan designation.
8. Not applicable
Jr
OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATION
I, Greg McCarry , hereby certify that I am the major property owner or
officer of the corporation owning property described in the attached application, and I have familiarized
myself with the rules and regulations of Jefferson County with respect to filing this application, and that
the statements, answers and information submitted presents the argument on behalf of this application and
are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Address P.O. Box 1780
City and
State Poulsbo, Was ington Phone 360-697-6626
Signature l for SouthBay Community Association
QQQQ
( poration or company name)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of Washington )
ss. )
County of Jefferson )
On this day personally appeared before me Greg McCarry . Known to be the
individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me
that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed for the
pu ses therein mentioned.
r / `\\\\ltilliltiflJl/Jg�/
i��I, )�A/�I ``����JSp,N SCHIgQ�O���i
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington G OT A R r �p■
�L�� = Q :
Residing at (� r9uJ l,Q� = i 8-of-2000 2
x
Date: /7°iii-qg i � ���� 8_ i_00 wxsys
, J4J111111 \o \`
Other property owners in this application must be listed below:
Name Signature
Address City/State Zip
8
APP-FORM2.doc 05/12/99
lif� ��At �
01/410°'
olymp
Groin T,l ty [ (� [ O d N p ' ",
er
A Pope Resources Company SEP
_�
JEFFERSON COUNTY
PERMIT CENTER
September 24, 1999
Alice King
Jefferson County Planning Department
P.O. Box 1220
Port Townsend, WA 98368
Re: Comprehensive Plan Amendment—Map Amendment/Map Correction
The Bay Club, Port Ludlow
Dear Alice,
Please accept this letter as notice that Olympic Property Group, as Applicant, would like
to request the withdrawal of The Bay Club (Parcel No. 821174005)petition for
Comprehensive Plan Amendment—Map Amendment/Map Correction.
We would also like to request a refund of the submittal fee in the amount of$250.00.
Thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerel
Won Rose, P.E.
Project Manager
19245 Tenth Avenue Northeast,P.O. Box 1780,Poulsbo,Washington 98370-0239
(360)697-6626,Seattle: (206)292-0517,Fax: (360)697-1156 GO
Olympic GiAriopero
TV'
A Pope Resources Company
July 14, 1999
Randy Kline, Associate Planner
Jefferson County Permit Center
621 Sheridan Street
Port Townsend, WA 98368
RE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment—Map Amendment/Map Correction
The Bay Club, Port Ludlow
Dear Randy,
Enclosed are the application materials for a comprehensive plan amendment - map
amendment/map correction for the Bay Club property in Port Ludlow. The application is
being made on behalf of the South Bay Community Association.
We are requesting the Comprehensive Plan designation be revised from Multifamily,
MPR-MF, to Resort Complex/Community Facilities, MPR-RC/CF, 10:1. This will most
accurately reflect the actual developed condition of this property.
We believe this request meets the criteria set out under Comprehensive Plan objective
LNP 1.5.2 for an error in mapping.
Enclosed are the following materials:
• A completed application form
• Answers to the questionnaire entitled(Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Questionnaire)
• A $250 fee for this application, Check No. 059329
• Assessor's map of the subject property
• 'Notarized ownership certificates
• An environmental checklist
•
19245 Tenth Avenue"Northeast,P.O.Box 1780,Poulsbo,Washington 98370-0239
(360) 697-6626,Seattle:(206)292-0517,Fax: 360)697-1156 r^p
Ili
r
Jefferson County Permit Center
Page 2 of 2
July 14, 1999
Please contact me at 360-697-6626 if you have any questions regarding this proposal.
Sincerely,
�r
Jo Ro • P.E.
Pr( •e' Manager
Olympic Property Group LLC
C: Greg McCarry, ORM
Mike Derrig
Sally Smith, CLOA
Ward Lawler, CLOA
Tom Murray, SBCA
Bill Schoenemann, SBCA
Frosty Foust, SBCA
Bob Herbst, LMC
Jim Laker, LOA
I',
e
a I - I
MAP SCALE GIVEN UNDER THE NORTH ARROW IS
FOR THE ORIGINAL DRAWING ONLY.
THIS COPY MAY BE A REDUCED OR ENLARGED
REPRODUCTION.
PLEASE REFER t0 THE SCALE BELOW.
FOR ORIGINAL MAP SCALE: 1" = 100' X = 1/2 FOOT
1" = 200' X = 1 FOOT
I* = 400' X = 2 FOOT
THE ASSESSOR DOES NOT IN ANY WAY, GUARANTEE
THE ACCURACY OF THE ACREAGE AND PARCEL BOUNDARIES
DEPICTED ON THESE MAPS. PARCEL SIZE AND
LOCATION IS BASED ON INFORMATION AVAILABLE,
INCLUDING RECORDED SURVEYS. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS,
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS, AND VARIOUS GOVERNMENT
SOURCES. WHERE THIS INFORMATION IS
INSUFFICIENT. PARCEL BOUNDARY LOCATIONS
ARE ESTIMATED.
PARCEL MAPS ARE UPDATED FREQUENTLY. PLEASE
CHECK WITH THE COUNTY ASSESSOR FOR THE
LATEST REVISION.
FOR MORE INFORMATION. CONTACT:
JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR
P.O. BOX 1220
PORT TOWNSEND, WA. 98368
W
.2
M
L1G 0
OQ
�V
a
xLAJ
L&JI�
z l
�>
F
W
1
000
N
I
r
r-
3
.•• = SlAbjeoCi` The 3ay Club Assessors Map
Parct 1
2630.96
Q X3.79 Ch-
—
fi•
2/x'1
4
(NE 1/4 17-28N-1E)
I
1) It
as cy'�-
'PORT &
(NE 1/4 20- 28N -1E)
V
N
� 'QO
W
W
z
I
ca
r-
3
L I-7
0
SCALE:
1" =200'
J ' 4.63 a. (w -g -
SE
1/4
DRWN.
SEC
17.
TWP
28N
RGE
1 E
s
10/11/90 PV
� 'QO
W
W
z
I
ca
r-
3
L I-7
0
SCALE:
1" =200'
J ' 4.63 a. (w -g -
VA"
DRWN.
T�xs (SEC te)
10/11/90 PV
/
42v*F2t6
REVISIONS
LOT 2 LOT
0 EN SPACE
oti� 16
3/17/94 PP*
rAX 2 (SEC 20)
20 21
5/16/94 PP*
10/19/94 PP*
12/20/94 DS*
6/5/95 DS*
JEFFERSON
COUNTY
ASSESSOR
12/13/95 SW
7/28/98 MF*
v
8211740.
�n
1
d
C�