Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
ZON2014-00045
JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TYPE I LAND USE PERMIT APPLICANT: MARC HILT PO BOX 1909 192 W FREDERICKS ST PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368-0062 DATE ISSUED: February 19, 2015 DATE EXPIRES: February 19, 2016 MLA NUMBER: MLA14-00090 PROJECT PLANNER: Joel Peterson PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THIS IS A PHASE 1 STORMWATER (CLEARING AND GRADING) PERMIT FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARCEL FOR COMMERCIAL AGRICULTURE, STORMWATER PERMIT WITH SEPA-- Dream City, LLC proposes to develop a zoned Light Industrial parcel for marijuana production at 192 W. Fredericks Street, Parcel 948601301. Phase 1 includes remodeling existing 2,592 sf building, dismantling 576 sf car port, adding 7,000 sf insulated metal building and making stormwater improvements. Phase 2 includes additional 7,000 sf building and three greenhouses totalling 22,638 sf; and addition of fire access lane. The project requires a stormwater permit, building permits, septic review and SEPA review for all phases. PROJECT LOCATION: EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13, LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN VAC ALLEY, SOPHIA ST, & SNAC ELWOOD ST ADJ CONDITIONS: 1.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 2.) If greater than 250 cubic yards of inert, demolition, and/or wood waste is used as fill material, a Solid Waste Handling permit may be required (WAC 173-350-990). Check with Department of Ecology, Waste 2 Resources, Julie Robertson (360) 407-6471. 3.) A Jefferson County Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Template and Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)Template, Drainage Analysis& Stormwater Findings, and SWPPP/TESC Notes were submitted by Streamline Environmental, dated 10/29/2014. The proponent shall install the stormwater management facilities and implement the Best Management Practices (BMPs) in accordance with the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW) and as specified in the Stormwater Site Plan and associated Construction Documents prepared by Streamline Environmental. Silt fence shall be installed per BMP C233 along the down gradient perimeter of development activities. Installation of Silt Fence in other locations may be required to prevent sediment from leaving the site. All Temporary Erosion & Sedimentation Control measures, and protective measures for critical areas and significant trees, shall be installed prior to initiating any land disturbing activities. Prior to commencing land disturbing activity, the proponent shall request an inspection of the installation of Temporary Erosion &Sedimentation Control (TESC) measures by Public Works. 4.) Cut and fill areas must not be in the area of any portion of the septic system or reserve drainfield area as permitted under SEP02-00111. Stormwater systems proposed on the site must meet the required 30-foot downslope setback from the septic drainfield and reserve drainfield area. 5.) In order to ensure that stormwater management facilities are constructed per the approved plans, the proponent shall request inspections by the Public Works Department during construction. In order to enable the Department to conduct inspections in a timely manner, the applicant shall notify the Department in a timely manner regarding the project construction schedule. Typical Inspections: - Installation of Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Measures (REQUIRED) -Clearing and Grading and road subgrade preparation -Placing roadway gravel base -Placing roadway crushed surfacing top course -Placing improved roadway surface(chip seal or asphalt concrete) -Paved Road Approach -Construction of stormwater management facilities (prior to backfill) (REQUIRED) -Additional inspections may be deemed necessary as project progresses 6.) After construction is complete and prior to DCD project final approval, the proponent shall submit a letter to the Public Works Department, from the Engineer of Record (EOR), certifying that the stormwater management facilities have been constructed per the approved plans and specifications. It is the responsibility of the proponent to schedule inspections with the EOR, his designee and/or qualified inspection firm(s), approved by the EOR, to provide for said final certification. 7.) Prior to final DCD project approval, the proponent shall submit an Operations and Maintenance Plan for the facility that is consistent with the requirements of the SWMMWW to the Public Works Department for review. 8.) To ensure that the stormwater management facilities are appropriately maintained for the life of the project, prior to final DCD project approval, the proponent shall be required to enter into a Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement with Jefferson County. The Public Works Department will send a copy of the Agreement, which has been signed by the Public Works Director, to the proponent. The proponent shall sign the Agreement before a notary, file it with the Jefferson County Auditor and notify Public Works when recorded. 9.) Prior to final DCD project approval, the proponent shall pay all costs related to the Public Works Department's application review, plan review, inspections, and preparation of the Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement. In the event that final approval is denied by Jefferson County or the proposal is not completed, the proponent shall still be responsible for paying the Public Works Department's fee. 10.) The required landscaping shall be installed prior to project occupancy. 11.) The landscape screening shall be installed as follows: Landscaping of Interior Lot Lines: "Screen-A" landscaping shall be installed as a full-screen visual barrier between the industrial site and residential zones to the west and north of the site. This screening shall be fifteen (15) feet in depth. This full-screening shall at a minimum consist of a mix of primarily evergreen trees and shrubs generally interspersed to form a continuous year-round screen that grows to at least eight feet in height within two growing seasons. Landscaping Road Frontage: "Screen-B" landscaping shall be installed as a filtered-screen visual separator between the industrial site and the frontage of West Fredericks Street. The screening shall be ten (10)feet in depth. The filtered screening shall at a minimum consist of a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs generally interspersed to create a filtered screen that grows to at least eight feet in height within two growing seasons. 12.) The installation of any sign shall be in conformance with Jefferson County Code 18.30.150. All non-exempt signs shall be subject to review and approval and may require issuance of a sign permit and/or a building permit by the administrator according to a Type I permit approval process. 13.) Exterior lighting shall not exceed 30 feet in height from the finished grade. Exterior lighting shall be energy-efficient and shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflections are contained within the boundaries of the parcel. Exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights-of-way. No lighting shall blink, flash, or be of unusually high intensity or brightness. All lighting fixtures shall be appropriate in scale, intensity, and height to the use they are serving. Any lighting installed in parking areas shall be of direct cutoff design so that the source is not visible from adjacent property. 14.) Development setback from W. Fredericks Street is 20 feet. Setback from residential parcels on west and north property line is 25 feet. Setback from light industrial parcel on east property line is 10 feet. 15.) The maximum area of impervious surface coverage shall not exceed 55%. The current proposal shows Phase 2 impervious surface coverage to be 54.7%. 16.) Parking shall be designed so that vehicle ingress and egress to W. Fredericks Street (a collector roadway) are headed in a forward motion. 17.) The intensity of sound emitted by any commercial or industrial activity shall not exceed levels established by the Washington State Department of Ecology under Chapter 173-60 WAC, and by Jefferson County under Resolution No. 67-85, "Establishment of Environmental Designations for Noise Abatement Areas for Jefferson County." FINDINGS: 1.) The Administrator finds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code, all other applicable ordinances and regulations, and is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map. 2.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 3.) Reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) by Jefferson County acting as lead agency. Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) issued on February 12, 2015. 4.) The parcel has been designated as Light Industrial under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 5.) The property is located at 192 West Fredericks Street. 6.) The property to the North and West is zoned Rural Residential 1:5. The property to the East is zoned Light Industrial. The property to the South is zoned Light IndustriaVCommercial. 7.) The proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies, and provisions of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Jefferson County Zoning Ordinance No. 09-0801-94. 8.) The use applied for is consistent with the permitted uses and activities anticipated within the"Light Industrial zone". 9.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on 2/17/15 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area. 10.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 11.) The applicant submitted a parking layout plan on December 11, 2014 that conforms to the general parking standards of 18.30.100. 12.) The applicant submitted a Landscaping Plan on December 11, 2014 that complies with the landscaping/screening requirements of 18.30.130. 13.) NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes" listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County may potentially be"critical habitat" for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there - Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches The Federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act requires landowners within 660 feet (1/8th of a mile) of an eagle nest to consult with the US Fish and Wildlife Service. This Eagle Act prohibits anyone from"taking" bald eagles. This federal law defines the term "take"and describes the possible legal consequences when a"take" occurs. Among other actions, "take" includes a disturbance of bald eagles or their habitat. Under federal law a permit may still be required for activities that impact bald eagles or their habitat. Contact the US Fish and Wildlife Service (http://www.fws.gov/pacific/eagle/) to learn more about how this law affects your project. Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species"taking', even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. APPEALS: Pursuant to RCW 36.70C,the applicant or any aggrieved party may appeal this final decision to Jefferson County Superior Court within twenty-one(21)calendar days of the date of issuance of this land use decision. For more information related to judical appeals see JCC 18.40.340. The Threshold Determination for this Type I Permit may not be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. For more information related to SEPA appeals see JCC 18.40.810. 220/20/;5'' UDC Adminis o MLA14-00090 \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_IssuePermit_U.rpt 2/19/2015 Page 4 of 4 o i 3 1 0- to 1 0 rp z <-Z Z z ADJACENT LAND USE:RESIDENTIAL 7.1 /vr1.(110 4 PROPERTY LINE 0 268.64' _ ����11 IIII b T'PE A LANDSCAPE SCREENING °r m z--YY O IDE YARD St i tSAGK I p - I PROPERTY "I. *� , A LINE e 90.00 di D � b �.,: — ,w i 50.0' --141."C)//4.,C y ., .zi\‘-‘>c• \,,,, cn 1^' I "r z^� ° if ° D 0 ; I v , fix,./ II - d8 � y Z ( � I \- Il®®65_4.\v Tomv i • <� *Ib -a � `A t -11; ,1.' &‘, o0 �I 7C 6 I \o hin 3 �\ _ , /�I / /7 No '; • • • .......mmt •• •, rn > . __, — fry— • — A— • PN— • — Y.(— • — A— •_ I (3, cr-s" • 11 _ SIDE YARD SETBACK -_ I 0 1 • kri • q‘Vild q 6 0 1 ri 41 rn ti iri -I Z t t-runl/ METAL BUILDING "A" z 2a-c" e ,15'-o" • 10 • • z (P A . _ / / ?i 0 II > z 43 z 2-m / -n m 0 A 6 li / / 2 i Pil 1 b., // IH. / (5.446,4d 29,-6" li) 0" d2 1111.1111111"..- V 0. 7 / L 1 ,NV . •'/ A --' --' _ / / • /1 . 0 6, ..--/ I q q -1,- ,• .. . _ . , i, „ 4• - > i „-- -• ' . /----- ---:_. 1 , 4-- / . •Ne' 1 -g • • , a / 0 1 Z 0- -A zzi ril ' ' );.,• • A ''.,'-' , • . • ol ns Z 1 . ., , .: __ •f 15'-0" . . , • / ,ki .. - a> —C1 ON 0 0 iI 7C in ' . A- / . 1 —. . . , , . •. g 1 4'-8"'"---, 16'-0"-- ,, . ... '-0, / / / -T....---...,\ 41 --1 , ,/ N 44. fo (- / / \ \ , ,. , , 1.. i / .-0.\\ ,p. / ,p-t / \ \ •1 %li& A 's ,, 90\*. a / / \ 130 \ , \ • .9../ / \ \ . . \ 0\ ,Z(4'-'•••4., 0 O3 / 1 1 .....„'........... i ••••• 1 / .) .._ CZ, Fri CI , 1 0 0 . • ...... .-- --. 1+ ' , ------ ---1— • ...• —______ , . . ' i - . ' Z -1=b, IS.i .,-..- .- [ ., • = 111111101 . 14 / 1 -4 I , ., ,, ,,, , ,, ,,,. _ •11 ..,, 0.._ .. H_ _ _ _ __ ,.., t m tx. _3 . _ _ , _ d IF• t. V rt PC:I 0 v.. il am,Z 1.0 etV 0 I. : Ir. ...t.v.42 > ,..7, ig ilf-.< 24,r1 Pi ..) ii CI mi k N um iT9.21° u) 6.vzg 4TEgaq- r;:r 17 13 -13 07 Ri C7) e?„*Iri ,-, ..5.° c,, CDREAM CITY, LLC •. SITE IMPROVEMENTS L'e' r t"c'E'5' o ci, — c g..t,41 riR.ce 3 R . q III ' VI m Ci) m z -1 - m 7.: p =U E51,7:2 22 z:•..*:1- z 0-1 co-i 5 n —N. 0 r— ro m C 192 W. FREDERICKS STREET O r, 0 ni x Li. 11— Z K PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 t 0 —1 -- = 1 1 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TYPE I LAND USE PERMIT APPLICANT: MARC HILT PO BOX 1909 192 W FREDERICKS ST PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368-0062 DATE ISSUEXPIRE: :February brua 1 2216 01 ^ O y DATE EXPIRES: February 19,2016 ((v" MLA NUMBER: MLA14-00090 PROJECT PLANNER:Joel Peterson PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THIS ISA PHASE 1 STORMWATER (CLEARING AND GRADING) PERMIT FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARCEL FOR COMMERCIAL AGRICULTURE, STORMWATER PERMIT WITH SEPA— Dream City, LLC proposes to develop a zoned Light Industrial parcel for marijuana production at 192 W. Fredericks Street, Parcel 948601301. Phase 1 includes remodeling existing 2,592 sf building, dismantling 576 sf car port, adding 7,000 sf insulated metal building and making stormwater improvements. Phase 2 includes additional 7,000 sf building and three greenhouses totalling 22,638 sf; and addition of fire access lane. The project requires a stormwater permit, building permits, septic review and SEPA review for all phases. PROJECT LOCATION: EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13, LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN VAC ALLEY, SOPHIA ST, &SNAG ELWOOD ST ADJ CONDITIONS: 1.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs)to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 2.) If greater than 250 cubic yards of inert, demolition, and/or wood waste is used as fill material, a Solid Waste Handling permit may be required (WAC 173-350-990). Check with Department of Ecology, Waste 2 Resources, Julie Robertson (360)407-6471. 3.) A Jefferson County Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Template and Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)Template, Drainage Analysis&Stormwater Findings, and SWPPPITESC Notes were submitted by Streamline Environmental, dated 10/29/2014. The proponent shall install the stormwater management facilities and implement the Best Management Practices (BMPs) in accordance with the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW)and as specified in the Stormwater Site Plan and associated Construction Documents prepared by Streamline Environmental. Silt fence shall be installed per BMP C233 along the down gradient perimeter of development activities. Installation of Silt Fence in other locations may be required to prevent sediment from leaving the site. All Temporary Erosion &Sedimentation Control measures, and protective measures for critical areas and significant trees, shall be installed prior to initiating any land disturbing activities. Prior to commencing land disturbing activity, the proponent shall request an inspection of the installation of Temporary Erosion&Sedimentation Control (TESC) measures by Public Works. 4.) Cut and fill areas must not be in the area of any portion of the septic system or reserve drainfield area as permitted under SEP02-00111. Stormwater systems proposed on the site must meet the required 30-foot downslope setback from the septic drainfield and reserve drainfield area. 5.) In order to ensure that stormwater management facilities are constructed per the approved plans, the proponent shall request inspections by the Public Works Department during construction. In order to enable the Department to conduct inspections in a timely manner, the applicant shall notify the Department in a timely manner regarding the project construction schedule. Typical Inspections: - Installation of Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Measures (REQUIRED) -Clearing and Grading and road subgrade preparation -Placing roadway gravel base -Placing roadway crushed surfacing top course -Placing improved roadway surface(chip seal or asphalt concrete) -Paved Road Approach -Construction of stormwater management facilities (prior to backfill) (REQUIRED) -Additional inspections may be deemed necessary as project progresses 6.) After construction is complete and prior to DCD project final approval, the proponent shall submit a letter to the Public Works Department, from the Engineer of Record (EOR), certifying that the stormwater management facilities have been constructed per the approved plans and specifications. It is the responsibility of the proponent to schedule inspections with the EOR, his designee and/or qualified inspection firm(s), approved by the EOR, to provide for said final certification. 7.) Prior to final DCD project approval, the proponent shall submit an Operations and Maintenance Plan for the facility that is consistent with the requirements of the SWMMWW to the Public Works Department for review. 8.) To ensure that the stormwater management facilities are appropriately maintained for the life of the project, prior to final DCD project approval, the proponent shall be required to enter into a Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement with Jefferson County. The Public Works Department will send a copy of the Agreement, which has been signed by the Public Works Director, to the proponent. The proponent shall sign the Agreement before a notary, file it with the Jefferson County Auditor and notify Public Works when recorded. 9.) Prior to final DCD project approval, the proponent shall pay all costs related to the Public Works Department's application review, plan review, inspections, and preparation of the Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement. In the event that final approval is denied by Jefferson County or the proposal is not completed, the proponent shall still be responsible for paying the Public Works Department's fee. 10.) The required landscaping shall be installed prior to project occupancy. 11.) The landscape screening shall be installed as follows: Landscaping of Interior Lot Lines: "Screen-A" landscaping shall be installed as a full-screen visual barrier between the industrial site and residential zones to the west and north of the site. This screening shall be fifteen (15)feet in depth. This full-screening shall at a minimum consist of a mix of primarily evergreen trees and shrubs generally interspersed to form a continuous year-round screen that grows to at least eight feet in height within two growing seasons. Landscaping Road Frontage: "Screen-B" landscaping shall be installed as a filtered-screen visual separator between the industrial site and the frontage of West Fredericks Street. The screening shall be ten (10)feet in depth. The filtered screening shall at a minimum consist of a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs generally interspersed to create a filtered screen that grows to at least eight feet in height within two growing seasons. 12.) The installation of any sign shall be in conformance with Jefferson County Code 18.30.150. All non-exempt signs shall be subject to review and approval and may require issuance of a sign permit and/or a building permit by the administrator according to a Type I permit approval process. 13.) Exterior lighting shall not exceed 30 feet in height from the finished grade. Exterior lighting shall be energy-efficient and shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflections are contained within the boundaries of the parcel. Exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights-of-way. No lighting shall blink, flash, or be of unusually high intensity or brightness. All lighting fixtures shall be appropriate in scale, intensity, and height to the use they are serving. Any lighting installed in parking areas shall be of direct cutoff design so that the source is not visible from adjacent property. 14.) Development setback from W. Fredericks Street is 20 feet. Setback from residential parcels on west and north property line is 25 feet. Setback from light industrial parcel on east property line is 10 feet. 15.) The maximum area of impervious surface coverage shall not exceed 55%. The current proposal shows Phase 2 impervious surface coverage to be 54.7%. 16.) Parking shall be designed so that vehicle ingress and egress to W. Fredericks Street (a collector roadway)are headed in a forward motion. 17.) The intensity of sound emitted by any commercial or industrial activity shall not exceed levels established by the Washington State Department of Ecology under Chapter 173-60 WAC, and by Jefferson County under Resolution No. 67-85, "Establishment of Environmental Designations for Noise Abatement Areas for Jefferson County." FINDINGS: 1.) The Administrator finds that this application complies with applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code,all other applicable ordinances and regulations, and is consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Land Use map. 2.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 3.) Reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) by Jefferson County acting as lead agency. Determination of Non-Significance(DNS) issued on February 12, 2015. 4.) The parcel has been designated as Light Industrial under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 5.) The property is located at 192 West Fredericks Street. 6.) The property to the North and West is zoned Rural Residential 1:5. The property to the East is zoned Light Industrial. The property to the South is zoned Light Industrial/Commercial. 7.) The proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies, and provisions of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Jefferson County Zoning Ordinance No. 09-0801-94. 8.) The use applied for is consistent with the permitted uses and activities anticipated within the"Light Industrial zone". 9.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on 2/17/15 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area. 10.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 11.) The applicant submitted a parking layout plan on December 11, 2014 that conforms to the general parking standards of 18.30.100. 12.) The applicant submitted a Landscaping Plan on December 11, 2014 that complies with the landscaping/screening requirements of 18.30.130. 13.) NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development, but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered, all activity in the immediate area shall be halted, and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8, 2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA, any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes"listed species (defined as causing harm, harassing, or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition, the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County may potentially be"critical habitat' for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken. To minimize the potential to damage habitat, all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline, freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes, wetlands, and forested areas near surface waters - Remove minimal vegetation for site development, especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there -Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than discharging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches The Federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act requires landowners within 660 feet(1/8th of a mile)of an eagle nest to consult with the US Fish and Wildlife Service. This Eagle Act prohibits anyone from"taking" bald eagles. This federal law defines the term "take"and describes the possible legal consequences when a"take" occurs. Among other actions, "take"includes a disturbance of bald eagles or their habitat. Under federal law a permit may still be required for activities that impact bald eagles or their habitat. Contact the US Fish and Wildlife Service (http://www.fws.gov/pacific/eagle/)to learn more about how this law affects your project. Any individual, group, or agency can bring suit for a listed species"taking", even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist, and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist. For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. APPEALS: Pursuant to RCW 36.70C,the applicant or any aggrieved party may appeal this final decision to Jefferson County Superior Court within twenty-one(21)calendar days of the date of issuance of this land use decision. For more information related to judical appeals see JCC 18.40.340. The Threshold Determination for this Type I Permit may not be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. For more information related to SEPA appeals see JCC 18.40.810. 2120 72.0/5--' UDCAdminis o MLA14-00090 1\tidemarkldatalfomu\FMLT IssuePermit_U.rpt 2/19/2015 Page 4 of 4 6191 r7:j .1A,!, ADJACENT LAND USE:RESIDENTIAL fn /v .�+\ _ PROPERTY LINE ® 268.64' °, — 1,--e d 11I TYKE A LANDSCAPE SCREENING �± eI . —�'_' �- f_,„ ri gCl-- (- < > a .—'...... + e^a . ' . . ° . 7) — \ SIN V` a �1L-.rte.iL -"� �I P \ ASIDE YARD SETBACK I Z -b i z x0 u �. q\ a \�,I, I i PROPERTY <'9 0 \ \ I :> 4 LME®30.00 N 1 P —p 2Q-4 -_— -..� 50.0 r BU��/�G' Np ?4'_4.. 1 I 4.1 �x z 1 1I ` G 'c„ sok ,4�� .z2� �. SFr , '�=a"_-� 1:,7:.6.....___1:5.:. .,_____,..%% , ' � rz �" .� N w �� P ; T . , \111 ' , Z I : I \�2U o z Iekg_4\�� T \ > 1,:,:-:- 1\$_6 � �; �� � " 1:174 I g X • I I ` I I� • C+ I -A 7s n\ He '� \`�, / o I o L \tnl‘ � Rl GJ 3 jj i � w u rr f �i� La �'> �!_O, __�F' I� W rn ,I d M.z,0,\5. a. 1iY 132.0' _ '^ .15-0 7j 10._0.. 0 la -12 , 4.g e g 1 I (l 7yy� t te 10 9.4 yy I � i ®�\ P A O . ,': � I zoo-1 NIII\ 1 1; j .;151 Q , p I N PRE-ENGINEERED GREENHOUSE > , U) I,-:::::,. : I thQ, (3J 24'x132'=9,504 SQFT 1 P 4 ® BUILDING "D" ti 6 Q y rn 1 II 500------- ------ bF V, pV1 ;11 r • rn;. 0 50.0 �� °��� �II��V� ���I�IIIIIIII� • I M g. �' \ ,i 132.0' 25,_ rn ail m u z —I I � Ie. • 132.0' ° QU 5 . \ IN PRE-ENGINEERED GREENHOUSE ",I ul it -1:1,1I \OO m$\ ppI � p p Ojbilk (3)24'x132 11 =q,504 SOFT BUILDING "E" N l',° .' 'li N 2 1 . . . . i . SSohiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii132.0' lil II t ill VI 61,,,,2mp 6o d 132.0'�N -iO A PRE-ENGINEERED GREENHOUSEp l% 24' 0"x132' =3,1685QFT l I $=�l � F'3 o OBUILDING "F" pIIg rnw� , 39 \72.0'Ili � 500' ----'- - - , m _ I � � w -' '0 O FIRE LANE I SIDE YARD SETBACK �� /�� PROPERTY LINE , 268.1T �/'�1�1J ADJACENT LANP USE:LIGHT INDUSTRIAL an Cn ..O [7 W D' .,Ps' N a cn -„vi - in -°. -« _ 4 , c .. 5-th ,G 70C OHO5"P •� m OND NN () �@D � 8CD n0 Q D jr v + ,nnwz ao In P00 O -c �+ .. 37 pm sacono mn � z nm3rn flmmmm3 � QN m ] a'. 3vz-14 O o v o S. m S. Q ��i ,1 j 'T N ,�.,}T'� 2 a. N Q O_ C 7 t+i 4-44 N Q X O �'N '^ X m O N .5_, x m 0 D O Q< 7 Q f O. UUi x rani' mi f' "'� •— m 7 Q 7 (D k'•n Q O n_ 7 7 O Q co_ 7 7 7 Q v: r O T-'i'• (U n 3 7 3 '��'1 o p. l 9.o 9, 0-z(c) a2 o D w m 7 0 " 7 n 2 ° D c 1 m 7 m cQ 3 rp 3 m < DA m o _ Y Noo' � 5'--6-- • �Dom ° m • m o Qoo D 3� Q IQ om ° • O N <• ,I .' 7 Q° :. O O N 7 �.Q m 0 6 , (Q Q. S S -7«,IQ �• m Or rn z n II z vCi 'o (D . • O N as Q N CO (O Zc. Z 0 rn co SS O' p 26(Q C N Q rn70 p' II pA, O co D W' ,• 7 7 j 7 7 0 /Q S. O 7 (7 O c N C •CA US �pZQO oQ � >jm s �tQm � cm � A cn-< pm CI, 0 a '" � m Q T Q ,•-•2. Q n O O y C O 7 (U 7 Q (U m N 7r T D p N V -, P D lZy (D > -Q..7 7 4 Q 7 P Q rt C Q Q --.7 Q O .� < Z oa\9 (� �, D N i" D • Q. o ..j t7'1 7, n -rl O_ (D °vTi 11) n 5. �' Q o,�°- a - O fl 0 a O fl j' m II II it II Q O -. Q r K ��.� � o � 2 8o? QC O7 � Op � < m � QC � N rn D O W -a C !! Q N o N 3 -w o CD n N n �^ 7 7 a chi, A V D C4:4 0 N H 3. 0 7• OC" 7 Q a 7• O. a (D Z 0` W 1N O U -a ar1 �O mm r� to 3y'o ig,.Sts ui Z m m i ; m DREAM CITY, LLC : SITE IMPROVEMENTS � w m 1 --I +' o g_ a LZ 75* z1- ° � o ed O RI 73 ^ 192 W. FREDERICKS STREET " S» �^ K PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 ^ # �y A 0 < F 4 4 • f'. 4' * 4 1 0 4 4, 4 + 4 + 4 ? T,. + , ..,........ ,, i. ., + 11 ikke44 ,4 + e kk -144 4 4 .4., 4Y u 4 + 4km + 4. 44i41- m - k \ . ''''. , 4 4 4- . tr, -4 4 (Dck‘ —0 , ... . _ .,.. - ,, , ,,, - „ ,.. ., , „ - — 4 44 k 4 1' 4-4 + 4 + 44 ,4 + + 4 - 1. , ,,, -44 34' L— L - 1-6-...'' :-4-2°-L. .°. i.....2..—..,_,,* 2 L,4.— ,. 0.0 0 , 4 +'.4 4 " 1k + 4' 4 4 4 4 * 4 4 1, + 4 44 4- 4 4 4., 0 171 .. .,—..1, -.116.-- -'--1.. -1....' ' 4. '' + *? ' ' .... 7:1 - ........ . ei ,___ ______ .r.i.... ._ — 34,4_._ . _....,_ ,0 , ,--- T "...._ ______ JA4_ - ri_. \ I , _. SIDE YARD SETBACK .1" I \\1 G") / 6! _ o D ti N) o r F'RE—ENGINEERED (1) --,fi ,rti METAL BUILDING "A" z ul 6 —T I ..i.• - * + - 1 g , r 4 CP Z ,-Ifi > /9 H H z/ rs. z 0 A n (II 8/ 7 1 a ,.,,.i. / -i 0 z x '.. .49Sc4 I4- /) //://4///1:11 I ,/) , -A / / , / 1 , )‘',....' k.... 1 t3 i __.%. I -1- 0 ..• ... ----- "Ig 1 I I (-. / / I I. 74 I- + + 4 i I 1 LI d § co.g, , v t , , I • 1 4 i I 14 a Z fT 4 1 Z . , r I/ Ai .. • / - CC rn QS, , csi 1..,....,4.1 A 8 , , 4,6 ,---.. 18-0' ///) , /.. ---........\\ 16lie / Fl/ 1 (.. \ II / , - 4 ,4• /.//) / / 1 i i\ 'A \ 4/1111("1 1 r 1 a, e / \ 11,, N s s \ ' \ ‘‘ °N3% \ / \ .ti:41 \ 4.7. \ / \ \ \ ,C1(.12 e 4 4 4 / \ \ \ \ \ 0 ‘, 031 1 ,iky.......... 4 4- .4 4 \\\ \ ...--4...... ..7.7.4.4... . , F / I cl i 00 I —_. .--- --,-4-' . __. --------/-77-- i 0 r....) A ' - ift - kk,. + 4. > 4- - 4, - - _.4i 1.1 El / 1 4., ( I 4, 1. 4, 4 v mI. ...,.. k. .k k 6 , , /F. ndi 4 4 .91 t 17 -rs rn co ril 1 o -4 e 6, 4 4 A „, . 3 3 + 3 ”" Z -... 1.. lz,-- -I— *--,,,, ,....., u, , , , , 4 + + 4- + + 4 4, 4 1k. 4,...--1.'''M"' -11—.1.-e-, 4 ..._. ,k, 4 r. 4, 14 ÷ ,4 4 4 $ a, ,4 1, 4- 4 + ± + 4' 4, ke 1 - , 4, 4, 4.. 4 t-k 4 , .4 14 4, 4 ,i, 44 4 4 k- 4., 4, Z til 4 \,' 1. .4 1, 4 k. 4 4 4. 4. 4' 1 -1 4 e + 4 4 1 --, 4 4 4 4 , 4,- - + 4. + 1 4 1 4 4 3 4 E d 33- '4- 4 " 4 CI 6 c=, 64.71 f ....'.... ."'""" .. 1m44 tik -4 ,-, k1-, + 4, 4, 4kkkr + 1 .41 ,1, 4 - 44- 44, * .t. , 4' . 144 -3744 e4 -1- 4kkl, 4 kk 1 + '4 / 4 k kk 4 4- 4 4 .7' + + 4 4 4 4 4, 'F- F' 44 4 + 44- 4 + 44 4 4 4 4 4 + k q 4 + 4 ÷ 4 a, 4 4 tk ,-kkk 4 + t i ik 4.. lk 4- 4 4. 4 b 1+4 4+el kk.k 4 4 4 4-44 1 t 4 4 4k kk .4, 4 4 t 4 4 N 6.,— 53 iliN iTil ' pa. _ . . DREAM CITY, LLC •. SITE IMPROVEMENTS c_ a. ,-- .,1,...., ,...,cs n c i i a rTi'd- .... --• M - 1 s _ : i'-- Wg Cl. p =VI' to -' oF.' m 192 W. FREDERICKS STREET ...--i A z E PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 Tk v m <0(D Q�v % a F XCD � ND D0 0 — ,N., co CD "0 .� Noir • � � + 7 N N 0_CD -, z C -303 = * gm �CD rn � Q m &`� o�0) m �0 7 c I M x v * O -c03 0 z- % O v 19' n o v m 7_La e ,CCI :,—: �� m mm5. o � Z A n3. (13° . C' —p �I 2 f �p vO.< Qvd � �. D � m o 3 D - vl �' v �' �o am a ° wmPm J1emiti:i' Co xo rn > > C7 I_ _ f- _ _ I 3 - y T1 -p �^H I I ii 1 m 01 W 1 - i4--- , m `n0, I O0 - 7 I r: c EC=- Wm co r ro k a C x ef I ,t _ I m G. N' I °, _ I :- ► 0 X m J a, each ^X. tilt I C m _ mo `O � o m c0m —O m o = 2 O �I I c m m'(. O v �� y=' I co (p I -0 O. SOW o. `� Q I ry `z ^ 2c fD m-O . ' m a3.0 2 -0 U Y u 1 y W R-.O I --0-, _ N I -ice 3Ny >> i 1 o 0 c `m A I( )I al - I =5 2 0 0- \d-0 �n c Dco 6 a iri rev. 3 -- `t�,' I › I H �� ODoOoQ - ... oo . moa D °ocn soy m� c> tV p - l o- 1 o.mov _,cn - -, m l i mxm CVC 70 I -5 O 0 II 300 6.NWo mx • GSC rn = ^' =o * ti W 0--I o 09 *-o smodsumoa inoa.9 xIS / >5' m C=, x 1 N N o— -, a o° dS 409'6=easy snolnuadwi O�' too) N ), 0 0 0 t7 3 -- ° `°a .asnoyuaaao,ZLx,Z£Pasodad 1� mIni —0_ N 'I g' m TE c I , r.s,. .��. TI • I n o D I - 00Z ., i /! ' _ \ 11 r ^C0=1O 1 CCD oD„7 a) L •• m CD C? ,� `m y I 03 o a� �_. =Q 1 . o 1 1�!"" " = ` i � `° r coo "= °° I--_:.,__L -N Ei- * `° �—o 1 � o com o ct'- - 1 W N �-3z v ii,• 1 s� 3�N �� f Cnnw-i o W O O u I r co.o. av w / v I F O OO ' ti_ci„,' -< " n 1 0 v, co s nodsumo 0o I '"-F---0 °' S N .. N I c.9i o m O 1 al ?y.9xIS , $ m ov° I o u v, dS 409'6=easy snoitiadwi 3. J o ^� W I c O Z esnoqueaJ9,ZLx,Z£1.Pasodad I r o rn� `‹ D O m- ,'n om= x al�n C I I CO ` -0 0-. L` I � W S d I c (nom ' -- `� , -► Iv N est m 1 J' "' „O7 sInodsumoa oo „g oml;o wnw!un N n (0 I dS 99 £=ea.ov snopuedwl l — 0 N f I. r, - I £asoqu9010.170(a 1.PasodoJd C-31N_ C v x �- C v -0 I .. / T � i v -N W A N mvm o� £p � � K -1 • < n' r. .+ I -m '` STA .4, 'gip o r °o0DN n -n ° --- -- 630 �N 0Foh �_ 2 D o OD (O W 0 I 1 kV coo �� .on A 00 _= I D(D yr : • \ 2 e 9 —,To CD 0 0 C7 0 I- rt 1 8 ° c- �' `1,, , ., Cola > 0 -1 � 00 � n (i) N I 0 � �1 � � ?�_� I y NOY a�S�� a° 1 Oo 1 Existing Drained Impervious Surface Areas Area Square Ft Comments Existing Building 2,592 Currently dispersed along buiding perimeters Existing Driveway 4,400 Currently dispersed - •I. .- 'o.- - Existing Total Impervious Area: 6,992 [ C IE fi V IE Parcel Area: 84,593 k Existing Impervious Coverage: 8% { MAR - 2 2015 Proposed New Drained Impervious Surface Areas JEFFEsc .0OJN1y t [1EP i OF CG.',,tiUNITY DEVELOPMENT Area Square Ft Comments Existing Building 2,592 Dispersed along building perimeter Revised Pervious Driveway & Parking Lot 7,200 Gravel, semi-pervious pavers or porous concrete 16 Downspouts tight-inged via 4" PVC to catch Proposed Buildings A& B 14,000 basins, tight-lined to below-slab infiltration beds 14 to 16 downspouts tight-linged to southern catch Three Proposed Greenhouses 22,638 basins or norhtern infiltration trenches Proposed Total Impervious Area: 46,430 Parcel Area: 84,593 Proposed Total Impervious Coverage: 54.9% Proposed New Building Roof Areas: 36,638 Prescribed Downspout Flow Infiltration 2 200 60 SF of infiltration trench or bed area per 1,000 SF Surface: of drained surface *Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, 2012; Design Criteria for Infiltration Trenches, pages 3-5 through 3-7(PDF pages 441-443; 60 SF of infiltration trench or 90 cubic ft of drywell per 1,000 SF of drained surface,for medium sands. A. SOR ti c WAS 0 / r. Y a Prepared by: Everett A.Sorensen,P.E. Impervious Surface Inventory Streamline Environmental, Inc. S Dream CityLLC 715 Grant Street:Port Townsend,WA 98368-2405 everett@streamlineenv.com;360-821-9960 192 VV. Fredericks Street Revised February 24,2015 Port Townsend, WA 98368 STRE4IVILJA1110 Jefferson County Parcel Number ENVIRONMENTAL 948601301 ._ECF JV Drainage Analysis and Stormwater Findings �� Dream City LLC MAR - 2 2015 • 192 W. Fredericks Street; Port Townsend, WA 98368 , Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 _ Is J JEFFERSONCOUNTY t___ DEPT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Parcel Area 84,953 SF (1.9 acres) Surface Gradient The site is very gently sloped, with the overall gradient downhill to the central northern area of the parcel, at slopes varying from 3 to 6%. Vegetation Undeveloped portions of the site are fully vegetated with mature plants, shrubs and trees. Soil Types Soils are generally sandy and appear to be very well-drained. The soil evaluation reported in the 2001 septic system design indicates generally highly-permeable sandy soils, with evidence of historical prolonged saturation at depths varying from 4 to 7 ft below ground surface. A soil test boring conducted by Streamline Environmental, Inc., on September 13, 2014, indicated medium-grained sands to at least 4 ft below ground surface. Surface Waters/Surface Flows No indications of surface flow were observed on the site or in the immediate vicinity. Downstream Analysis The ground surface generally slopes toward properties to the north of the subject parcel. The greater vicinity slopes generally to the northeast and east. No DNR streams are reported within 4,000 ft of the subject parcel. While no indications of stormwater surface flow were observed at the site, there is a drainage gully to the north of the site, centrally-located, that appears to convey stormwater flow during peak flow conditions. However, no indications of erosion or channeling were observed in this gully. Existing Development includes a 2,592 SF building and an approximately 4,400 SF gravel driveway. Existing Stormwater Management Facilities No enhanced stormwater management facilities currently exist. Proposed Development includes constructing a 12'x116' emergency access drive at the east end of the parcel, constructing two 7,000 SF buildings and constructing three greenhouses totaling approximately 23,000 SF. Stormwater Management Strategy Full on-site infiltration of stormwater should be feasible. Proposed Downspout Flow Infiltration Downspout flow from the two proposed 7,000 SF buildings, each equipped with at least 8 roof downspouts, would flow to Type I Catch Basins, in turn plumbed to the two proposed below-slab infiltration beds, as shown on the Revised Site Plan with Proposed Stormwater Management Facilities. Seven or eight southern downspouts from the proposed three Greenhouses would be tight-lined to the Type 1 Catch Basins, also shown. Seven or eight northern Greenhouse downspouts would be tight-lined to the proposed infiltration trenches along the northern boundary, also as shown. These infiltration units are sized as prescribed in Ecology's Stormwater Manual, Section 3.1.1 Downspout Full Infiltration Systems (BMP T5.10A), in the Design Criteria Subsection. All three infiltration units would be equipped with emergency overflows leading to the natural site overflow at the north boundary. Proposed Vegetated Swale for Parking Lot & Driveway Run-Off The proposed expanded parking area and existing driveway shall be graded at 1% to direct run-off south and west (as shown on Site Plan), toward the existing vegetated area west of the existing building. This vegetated area already has a slight slope to the north. Slight grading adjustments to this area, completed during grading activities according to conditions encountered, shall be completed in order to prevent off-site flow from this vegetated area westward (toward neighboring parcel), and eastward (toward the existing building). At least 70 ft of vegetated path will provide natural filtration and treatment of stormwater as it soaks into the ground. A. S0;06,- • -•(- 0, ��o f ��A,§71-As`�2 C ?- 0 1 ' '` zw Stormwater Findings and Prepared by: Everett A.Sorensen, P.E. .p � g Streamline Environmental, Inc. 0�� cc �w Recommendations 715 Grant Street; Port Townsend,WA 98368-2405 everett@streamlineenv.com;360-821-9960 J'; Dream City LLC March 2,2015 ' 192 W. Fredericks Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 sr>R ENVIRRONMONMENTALdve Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 15 mil PVC vapor barrier / 2" Extruded Polystyrene Insulation Reinforced Concrete Slab / Class C Non-woven Filter Fabric — 0 e oo 0 0 o e o o I From Catch 1��'— we Basin To Emergency Overflow Coarse Drain Rock erforated Sched 40 PVC Influent Pipeline Undisturbed (or equivalent thick-walled pipe) Trench 1.5 to 3 Sorted &Washed Native Soil Infiltration Bed Cross-Section _ >1' Side View and End View 0 >2' Not-To-Scale 8' Infiltration Bed Suggested Installation Sequence: 1. Prepare level surface to bear slab of greenhouse (excavate to native, or fill with suitable material to 90% compaction). 2. Excavate horizontal infiltration bed volume (8 ft wide by >-2 ft deep by 100 ft long) in the center of greenhouse footprint. Excavate trenches at both ends of infiltration bed, to depths of about 12 inches ABOVE bed bottom to accommodate influent and effluent piping. Influent trench shall slope at least 1% toward infiltration bed. Effluent trench shall slope 1% from infiltration bed. 3. Line excavation with a Class C geotextile filter fabric, or equivalent, taking care to avoid punctures and void spaces. 4. Place washed 1%" to 3" drain rock to depth of at least 12". 5. Install 6" schedule 40 PVC non-perforated pipe from upstream catch basin to infiltration bed, transitioned to 100 ft of 6" schedule 40 PVC perforated pipe on drain rock in bed, transitioned to non-perforated 4" schedule 40 PVC pipeline to system overflow. 6. Cover perforated pipe in infiltration bed with drain rock to match grade surrounding bed. D E C 1 8 'V/I i 7. Cover influent and effluent piping with coarse sand. �+ 8. Cover entire infiltration bed with Class C Non-woven Geotextile filter fabric, or equivalent. 9. Lay insulation such as 2" extruded polystyrene board. f I n, MAR •- 2 2T5 10. Cover insulation with 15 mil PVC liner(vapor barrier). 11. Prepare to pour slab (install re-bar, radiant heating tubing, etc.). JErFERSON COUNTY n .^,,'MTYDEVELOPMENT Cross-Sections of Proposed Greenhouse Drawn by: Everett A. Sorensen, P.E. Below-Slab Stormwater Infiltration Beds Streamline Environmental, Inc. 715 Grant Street Dream City LLC Port Townsend, WA 98368 ,c/ A. SoR/ti 192 W. Fredericks Street everett@streamlineenv.com 360-821-9960 �,�4O4 l��VA�1//4 2 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Revised February 24, 2015F. - 0 84,953 SF (1 .95 acres) -It_; ',.' zk, Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 •� $ ' . `" SEP02-111 ZON14-45 MLA14-90 STREAMLIgNE ENVIRONMENTAL P 4( " ALS' roof I drain PLAN VIEW NTS ,- - 4"rigid or 6"flexible f perforated pipe minimimmaimilli infiltration trench -sump w/solid lid PLAN VIEW roof drain NTS II overflow 4"rigid or 6"flexible splash block perforated pipe 6"to 24" •,`����v ��0� tiJ. 0Q�rrih .Cg a washed rock °CI°u04; C _1 ii... "'min A 12" h a-4-- 1 1/2"-3/4" =1 0 0 0(1 0: ,1'mm Q.4".1] ° °• - / 1 Screen \— Optional Catch Basin L/ Loo.A 65' fi Th Horizontal Infiltrative Surface =1/ filter fabric ' 11- I MAR - 3 ""-' li compacted backflU +6"to 24" t� � Pl. I u L1I Cover Material Applied to 4"rigid or 6-flexible o'- Match Adjacent Grade t >6,, ° °o rat • o perforated pipe ','!,'Ti. ,,';rT,PF Co^;1M111':';)_ op , op , 4 t ,`o o • 4a 0 0 n2" 4 •po 0 �p O ti°w . ___ washed rock •C V o ° C's-'13 7 • 1 112"-3/4" A.A. SO4 A•. a o�V 0. o 'SLC' c WASI 47' Os I'.. 5. `` :-' 6i. A Horizontal Infiltrative Surface SECTION A _. :j, ' J' z`4 NTS o/ •,t, 3251, ,,• .44 • Figure 3.1.2-Typical Downspout Infiltration Trench r0/t d,JAL .� Notes: 1. Infiltration trenches along northern boundary shall be broken up into two / I horizontal segments to accommodate the final slope achieved after site grading. 2. Catch basin is recommended, but may be deleted if another method of debris Details of Proposed removal is deployed, such as downspout screening racks. Stormwater Infiltration Trenches 3. Trenches shall each be equipped with a tight-line overflow routed to the site's natural overflow point, mid-way along northern boundary. Dream City LLC Source: Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington;Volume Ill - 192 W. Fredericks Street Hydrologic Analysis and Flow Control BMP5-August 2012; Page 3-7 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Annotations By: Everett A.Sorensen, P.E. 84,953 SF (1.95 acres) Streamline Environmental, Inc. Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 715 Grant Street; Port Townsend,WA 98 36 8-24 05 SEP02-111 ZON14-45 MLA14-90 everett@streamlineenv.com;360-821-9960 March 3,2015 Elizabeth Williams From: ev_sorensen@hotmail.com on behalf of Everett A. Sorensen <everett@streamlineenv.com> Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 10:41 AM To: Eric Kuzma; Joel Peterson Cc: Elizabeth Williams; Simon Little; marc@marchilt.com; Dominic Morrison; Wendy Davis; Bill Staples Subject: MLA14-90 Revised Stormwater Management Plans Attachments: 192 W Fredericks Steet Stormwater Site Plans, Revisions Mar 2, 2015.pdf Hello Eric and Joel, This morning I submitted to both of you, stamped & signed hard copies of the attached Revised Stormwater Plans for Dream City LLC, 192 W. Fredericks. Per previous discussions with Eric, the main revisions include: • Removal of proposed rain gardens along the southern boundary, • Approximate locations of 30 proposed downspouts and two Type I catch basins, • Proposed grading of driveway and parking area to direct run-off to an existing vegetated swath west of the existing building, • Modifications and expansions to the proposed below-slab infiltration beds, two of which are now proposed for both large greenhouses, and • Construction details of the proposed below-slab infiltration beds. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Everett Everett A. Sorensen, P.E. Streamline Environmental, Inc. 1821 Sahlman Drive, Suite B; Tampa, FL 33605 715 Grant Street; Port Townsend, WA 98368-2405 360-821-9960 1 e . m O� Dw o Z P ^ i !G < CO °, (D Q N Q [o N y coo 3 cocr, C. I V <r.n aid 3 � X1 K y sn '�� n0 0CD j a mo ,. s a g � N .N.. f� �fv -°� TILS C 1Z N Sry N ca •• ) O m - m .I �' Ufl o � m �tv —O cn �j von v aSD a cy DRI z m D m I 0 160 ,,. -o b co co P ro Fa- C) - h 1- ego ---___ V - - yCO 0 m — I I AI I 1 1 n: I o lo J c T I �'� a�e com - o o ,y 1 m I 0 co N I _-�"--_� rnm I 0CD - 7 I i' g- da CD I N3 1 I 13 `D CP w Is T �. I I I - I I aim �(n o = J CCD I Z' I X cn _ I 1",m, J ma ,'---�--- co co -� 0 ( y m zo (a ;5 o ^ m cox_1:1 "0co a omc co cc, . co 0.70'.ofv o —� �. Ix Scc to mnoDR -13 n a IIi CT) '.__/�_ - w- 1n 0-ID ado1S% ' O - X -i Ila - I i �Cn Ill Notes° 0 CI a o com-coQ v, _ I o l_ o I Fili, D I " o omo, sem., — \ x mm� ca N 1 =G 0� 03C) :n,mo m'm' I i n< Na IV ` 1 - * ..40 0 o m N o slnodsumoa looa.9 X!S =- s m n O \ J b S.— ,° J ° q N �S 409'6=easy sno!n�adwl m ;/ 11 1� IV- 3 ,, .5.o o O 3 v a l asnoyuaaJs,ZLX Z£Pasodad 1 A I{ _ O m c (n� O I a ^ �'n 3 1 , , Y •''•� �10 OZ I —1 Ill c t/l v 11 : o,--" \ 0 c H I (0cno�m • ! trl �CD� 0 CD m >. Iii I A 1v of1 p IT CAO I,r 0 0.) t KO I �� �Bo � v o x �"3Q'* I _ 1 w 3 v r m N x co 'a' n u I ' , c 2.m o-CO 0- I .. +CO 0 ` O 1 . 1 0oc _A C) N`' J N O 7 ''. III <.< Ivo slnodsunno4 pod XIS voOO; I ow m ooN •III.- I aW ,ti' oIImc- ; JS 17096=eaV snolnedwl 0 Z asnoyuaa ZLXZ£ Pasodad -,A I oc L O CI Q • -0 oa 1" ..-----___ Oo SD CO S N 1 = N T co sinodsunnoQ}ooa,g OMj�o wnwlulW l' o w N CD - n) I dS 99l'£=ea y sno!n edwl I . m o — !v I £asnoyuaa ,t x,Z£i.Pasodad Ln o Ej _ xQ .pO Ww -n CQ O � o\v L. m 0- (A D m 0 m I 7 r co Cr (D -1 a Q al 3 I r, .:__. CD I < / 16£2- s„,`A�;\,1i �..t \ ,V > N O 1 .n � Tia .._r— oo D cri n -n -, —r-- o N At v <Oo7O � � ,-IN -I cn o Stormwater Facilities Operations & Maintenance Plan Dream City LLC 192 W. Fredericks Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Catch Basin Maintenance Three catch basins(CBs) are located on the site: 1. Middle of Main On-Site Parking Area, draining to western vegetated swale, 2. Immediately South of Greenhouse A south entry, draining to infiltration bed beneath Greenhouse A, and 3. Immediately South of Greenhouse B south entry, draining to infiltration bed beneath Greenhouse B. Visual Inspections Catch Basins must be visually inspected monthly during rainy season. Shine flashlight through grate to observe accumulated sediment and/or debris. Remove Sediment and Debris If accumulation is within 6 inches of the outlet, remove grate to gain access, remove debris which generally can be disposed as yard waste. Remove and dispose sediment. Infiltration Bed Preventive Maintenance Four Subsurface Infiltration beds are located on the site as follows: 1. Beneath Greenhouse A, 2. Beneath Greenhouse B, 3. North of Greenhouses (two beds aligned in series). Prevent Debris from Entering Since these beds are not accessible for sediment removal, care must be taken to prevent debris from entering the beds (see Catch Basin Maintenance, above). Greenhouse Downspouts are directly plumbed to the north boundary infiltration beds. Gutters must be equipped with downspout screens, which must be inspected and cleaned regularly. Maintain Emergency Overflows The overflows from these infiltration beds are routed to a rip- rap lined depression in the north central portion of the facility. Rip-rap must be maintained in order to prevent scouring during overflow conditions. Inspect annually and add rip-rap to any areas exhibiting signs of erosion. Vegetated Swale Maintenance A 140 ft long vegetated swale along the western edge of the site receives stormwater run-off from the driveway(direct run-off) and parking area (via the parking area catch basin). Maintain Vegetation Vegetation in the swale can naturally cleanse pollution-bearing stormwater. Maintain a fully vegetated surface. Re-seed prior to wet seasons. Maintain Velocity-Reducing Rip-Rap Rows of rip-rap at regular intervals along the swale serve to slow stormwater flow. Maintain these features. Prevent Release of Contamination Avoid releasing contaminants. If excessive oil staining is observed on parking surfaces, locate source and eliminate. Pick up trash before it enters catch basins. Prepared by: Everett A. Sorensen, P.E. July 10, 2015 Streamline Environmental, Inc. 715 Grant Street; Port Townsend, WA 98368 everettastreamlineenv.com 360-821-9960 roof drain PLAN VIEW NTS r 4'•rigid or 6"flexible perforated pipe 110) • infiltration trench -sump w/solid lid PLAN VIEW roof drain NTS overflow 4"rigid or 6"flexible splash block perforated pipe 6"to 24" - •0 gw (° O bc3 a washed rods °a°°"• 1'pin 5.0'min 12" ° — 1 1l2"-3f4" a° ° °I 1'min Screen Optional Catch Basin LA 65' Horizontal Infiltrative Surface filter fabric lcompacted backfill Cover Material Applied to_ to 24 4"rigid or 6"flexible Match Adjacent Grade t ,6.. "73 °• perforated pipe 1 ��°vov° ° va 1z" o o v o c washed rock 0 ° ° °Q v ° 1 1/2"-3/4" ,Q• o °_7 °. ° I•-- 5' Horizontal Infiltrative Surface SECTION A NTS Figure 3.1.2—Typical Downspout Infiltration Trench Notes: 1. Infiltration trenches along northern boundary shall be broken up into two horizontal segments to accommodate the final slope achieved after site grading. 2. Catch basin is recommended, but may be deleted if another method of debris Details of Proposed removal is deployed, such as downspout screening racks. Stormwater Infiltration Trenches 3. Trenches shall each be equipped with a tight-line overflow routed to the site's natural overflow point, mid-way along northern boundary. Dream City LLC Source: Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington;Volume III– 192 W. Fredericks Street Hydrologic Analysis and Flow Control BMPS–August 2012; Page 3-7 Port Townsend, WA 98368 84,953 SF (1.95 acres) Annotationst Streamline Environmental, EveretteA1, Sorensen, P.E. Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 Streamline Environmental,Inc. 715 Grant Street;Port Townsend,WA 98368-2405 SEP02-111 ZON14-45 MLA14-90 everett©streamlineenv.com;360-821-9960 March 3,2015 Jefferson County NitI. Department of Public Works 1 r 623 Sheridan St. '' it Port Townsend, WA 98368 • c} (360) 385-9160 Monte Reinders, P.E. Public Works Director/County Engineer Date: 3/11/15 To: Joel Peterson,DCD From: Eric Kuzma, JCPW Project: Dream City LLC: (ZON14-00045/MLA14-00090),JCPW Project#(94014090) Subject: Development Review: Stormwater Management-Phase 2 APPLICATION REVIEW A. Stormwater Management Unified Development Code Requirement(s): The Jefferson County Unified Development Code,Sections 18.30.060,Grading and excavation standards and 18.30.070,Stormwater Management Standards both set standards for erosion and sedimentation control and stormwater management. The code adopts the requirements set forth by the most current version of the Washington Department of Ecology,Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington(SWMMWW). JCPW Findings: The proponent has chosen to divide the Stormwater Permitting into two phases. Stormwater Phase 1 -Clearing&Grading—PW comments were submitted 1/26/15 Stormwater Phase 2-Permanent Stormwater Management System (The below comments refer only to Stormwater Phase 2.) The associated parcel(948601301)is 84,996 sf(1.95 acres)and zoned LI(Light Industrial). This project proposes to clear and grade nearly the entire site,not including the existing structure(2,650 sf)and drainfield primary and reserve areas. Three greenhouses (9,504 sf+9,504 sf+3,168 sf)and two steel pole buildings(7000 sf+7000 sf)and)will be constructed for the growth and production of commercial marijuana. The impervious area is 36,176 sf(new structures)+2,650 sf(existing structure)+2,800 sf(new driveway)+4,400 sf(existing driveway)for a Total Impervious Area of 46,026 sf or(54.1%±). Per the SWMMWW the project is classified as"New Development"given that it will further develop a site that has less than 35%existing impervious coverage.The project will also create more than 5000 sf of new Page Il plus replaced hard surface area(which includes pervious pavements).Given this criteria,the proponent shall comply with Minimum Requirements#1-#9 of the SWMMWW. To demonstrate compliance with Minimum Requirements#1-#9 the proponent has submitted the following: - A Jefferson County Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Template. - A(5)page submittal from Streamline Environmental(dated 3/2/15),including Drainage Analysis& Stormwater Findings,Impervious Surface Inventory,Revised Site Plan with Proposed Stormwater Facilities,Cross-Sections of Proposed Greenhouse Below-Slab Stormwater Infiltration Beds,and Details of Proposed Stormwater Infiltration Tenches(3/3/15). - A(2)page submittal from Studio STL(dated 12/11/14),including:Preliminary Site Plan,and Parking Plan. The submitted Construction Schedule specifies work could begin in late 2014(Ph. 1)/early 2015(Ph.2). (Note that the above construction phases are not associated with the phased Stormwater Permits.) Per both the Soil Survey of Jefferson County and the Natural Resources Conservation Service),the soils on- site are mapped primarily as(HuC),Hoypus gravelly loamy sand with a permeability of 6.3-20.0 inches per hour,and(CfD)Cassolary sandy with a permeability of 2.0-6.0 inches per hour. A soil evaluation was also performed in both 2002 and 2014. Stormwater from the(5)new structures is proposed to be managed by either,one of two(800 sf) Below-Slab Infiltration Beds and/or a two tiered,level Infiltration Trench(BMP T5.10A)(325 sf x 2)along the north property boundary. Ml three systems are equipped with a rip-rap lined emergency overflow to the site's natural drainage,centrally located along the north property boundary and downslope of the primary and reserve drainfield areas. Streamline Environmental has prescribed,per the SWMMWW and the site soil type,60sf of Infiltration Trench/Bed area per 1000 sf of roof area. Based upon the roof area of the(5)new structures these facilities are intended to serve,the minimum infiltration area would be 2,171 sf. Streamline Environmental has proposed a total of 2,250 sf. Stream line Environmental has specified a 10'-0"(reduced from 15'-0")separation between the Infiltration Trench and Greenhouse D,E, &F foundations based upon their engineering judgment. Stormwater from the compacted gravel driveway/parking area will be channelized into a swale which will provide a greater than 50'-0"vegetated flow path. Stormwater Phase 2-JCPW Recommendations: • The proponent shall install the stormwater management facilities and implement the Best Management Practices(BMP's)proposed in the above referenced Stormwater Site Plan& associated Construction Documents. - The two segments of the proposed Infiltration Trench along the north property boundary shall be installed level per the submitted detail,if the actual grade does not allow installation per the submitted detail the design will need to be revised accordingly. - The as-built configuration of downspout tight-lines shall evenly distribute stormwater to Infiltration the facilities per the previously prescribed ratio. Page 12 • All temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures,and protective measures for critical areas and significant trees,shall be installed prior to initiating any construction activities. • In accordance with the Jefferson County Unified Development Code,Section 18.30.080(1)(f): Clearing,grading, and construction of roads,bridges,utilities,and stormwater management facilities shall be inspected by JCPW. In order to enable the department to conduct inspections in a timely manner,the applicant shall notify the department in a timely manner regarding the project construction schedule. Tunical Inspections: • Installation of temporary erosion and sediment control measures (Required) • Clearing(and Grading)and road subgrade preparation; • Placing roadway gravel base; • Placing roadway crushed surfacing top course; • Placing improved roadway surface(chip seal or asphalt concrete); • Construction of stormwater management facilities; (Required) • Final plat review. • (Additional inspections may be deemed necessary as project progresses.) • After construction is complete and prior to final DCD project approval,the proponent shall submit a letter to the Public Works Department,from the Engineer of Record(EOR),certifying that the stormwater management facilities have been constructed per the approved plans&specifications. It is the responsibility of the proponent to schedule inspections with the E.O.R.,his designee&/or qualified inspection firm(s),approved by the E.O.R.,to provide for said final certification. • Prior to final DCD project approval,the proponent may be required to submit an Operations and Maintenance Plan for the facility that is consistent with the requirements of the SWMMWW(Vol.5, Section 4.6,etc.)to the Public Works Department for review. • To ensure that the stormwater management facilities are appropriately maintained for the life of the project,prior to final DCD project approval,the proponent shall be required to enter into a Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement with Jefferson County. The Public Works Department will send a copy of the Agreement,which has been signed by the Public Works Director,to the proponent. The proponent shall sign the Agreement before a notary,file it with the Jefferson County Auditor and notify Public Works when recorded. B. Transportation Unified Development Code Requirement(s): The Jefferson County Unified Development Code,Sections 18.30.020(5),General Development Standards, states that all land use activities shall be served by appropriate transportation facilities.Transportation facilities shall be adequate to meet the level of service standards adopted in the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and the appropriate design standards referenced in JCC 18.30.080(1)(a). JCPW Recommendation: • Public Works recommends finding that the work specifically associated with this permit is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts to the County Road system. Page 13 C. Public Works Department Fees Requirement: Unified Development Code Requirement(s): The Jefferson County Unified Development Code Chapter 18.30.080(1)(u)authorizes the Public Works Department to assess fees in accordance with the Jefferson County Fee Schedule Ordinance for development review activities including application and plan review,inspections,meetings,hearings, and final review. • Prior to DCD project approval,the proponent shall pay all costs related to the Department's application review,plan review,inspections,and preparation of the Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement.In accordance with the Jefferson County Public Works Department Fee Schedule,the Department's 2014 hourly development review fee is$83 per hour. In the event that approval for the proposal is denied by Jefferson County or the proposal is not completed,the proponent shall still be responsible for paying the Department's fee. Page l4 1.,\--Crit ' c41-' L . _-h- - 1 r —. -- -5-1K}--- a c, Arck. Jefferson County • Department of Public Works .t_/aV 623 Sheridan St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 385-9160 ' Monte Reinders, P.E. Public Works Director/County Engineer Date: 3/10/15 To: Joel Peterson,DCD From: Eric Kuzma,JCPW Project: Dream City LLC: (ZON14-00045/MLA14-00090),JCPW Project#(94014090) Subject: Development Review: Stormwater Management-Phase 2—Preliminary APPLICATION REVIEW A. Stormwater Management Unified Development Code Requirement(s): The Jefferson County Unified Development Code,Sections 18.30.060,Grading and excavation standards and 18.30.070,Stormwater Management Standards both set standards for erosion and sedimentation control and stormwater management. The code adopts the requirements set forth by the most current version of the Washington Department of Ecology, Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington(SWMMWW). JCPW Findings: The proponent has chosen to divide the Stormwater Permitting into two phases. Stormwater Phase 1 -Clearing&Grading—PW comments were submitted 1/26/15. Stormwater Phase 2-Permanent Stormwater Management System (The below comments refer only to Stormwater Phase 2) The associated parcel(948601301)is 84,996 sf(1.95 acres)and zoned LI(Light Industrial). This project proposes to clear and grade nearly the entire site,not including the existing structure(2,650 sf)and drainfield primary and reserve areas. Three greenhouses (9,504 sf+9,504 sf+ 3,168 sf)and two steel pole buildings(7000 sf+7000 sf)and)will be constructed for the growth and production of commercial marijuana. The impervious area is 36,176 sf(new structures)+2,650 sf(existing structure)+2,800 sf(new driveway)+4,400 sf(existing driveway)for a Total Impervious Area of 46,026 sf or(54.1%±). Per the SWMMWW the project is classified as"New Development"given that it will further develop a site that has less than 35%existing impervious coverage.The project will also create more than 5000 sf of new plus replaced hard surface area(which includes pervious pavements). Given this criteria,the proponent shall comply with Minimum Requirements#1-#9 of the SWMMWW. Page I 1 To demonstrate compliance with Minimum Requirements#1-#9 the proponent has submitted the following: - A Jefferson County Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Template. - A(5)page submittal from Streamline Environmental(dated 3/2115),including Drainage Analysis& Stormwater Findings,Impervious Surface Inventory,Revised Site Plan with Proposed Stormwater Facilities,Cross-Sections of Proposed Greenhouse Below-Slab Stormwater Infiltration Beds,and Details of Proposed Stormwater Infiltration Tenches(3/3/15). - A(2)page submittal from Studio STL(dated 12/11/14),including:Preliminary Site Plan,and Parking Plan. The submitted Construction Schedule specifies work could begin in late 2014(Ph. 1)/early 2015(Ph.2). (Note that the above construction phases are not associated with the phased Stormwater Permits.) Per both the Soil Survey of Jefferson County and the Natural Resources Conservation Service),the soils on- site are mapped primarily as(HuC),Hoypus gravelly loamy sand with a permeability of 6.3-20.0 inches per hour,and(CfD)Cassolary sandy with a permeability of 2.0-6.0 inches per hour. A soil evaluation was also performed in both 2002 and 2014. Stormwater from the(5)new structures is proposed to be managed by either,one of two(800 sf) Below-Slab Infiltration Beds and/or a two tiered,level Infiltration Trench(BMP T5.10A)(325 sf x 2) along the north property boundary. All three systems are equipped with a rip-rap lined emergency overflow to the site's natural drainage,centrally located along the north property boundary and downslope of the primary and reserve drainfield areas. Streamline Environmental has prescribed,per the SWIVIMWW and the site soil type,60sf of Infiltration Trench/Bed area per 1000 sf of roof area. Based upon the roof area of the(5)new structures these facilities are intended to serve,the minimum infiltration area would be 2,171 sf. Streamline Environmental has proposed a total of 2,250 sf. Stormwater from the compacted gravel driveway/parking area will be treated through a "Vegetated Swale". Stormwater Phase 2-JCPW Ouestions/Comments: • Stream line Environmental has specified a combined Infiltration Bed/Trench area based upon the SWMMWW. Based upon this reference the total proposed Bed/Trench area appears adequate. However,the two segments of the proposed Infiltration Trench along the north property boundary appear to be disproportionately dosed. Please clarify. • Please provide more specificity regarding the"Vegetated Swale"for the parking area. Our assumption is that it is a Bioretention Swale per SWMMWW BMP 17.30,for the treatment capacity. • A 10'-0"setback is shown between the infiltration trench and the north side of the buildings.Per the SWMMWW Vol. 3,Figure 3.1.3, 15'-0"is the minimum required separation.Please clarify. • From the Stormwater Findings,"Full on-site infiltration of stormwater should be feasible." Please clarify. Stormwater Phase 2-JCPW Recommendations: • The proponent shall install the stormwater management facilities and implement the Best Management Practices(BMP's)proposed in the above referenced Stormwater Site Plan& associated Construction Documents. Page I2 - The two segments of the proposed Infiltration Trench along the north property boundary shall be installed level per the submitted detail,if the actual grade does not allow installation per the submitted detail the design will need to be revised accordingly. - (Address preliminary comments). • All temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures,and protective measures for critical areas and significant trees,shall be installed prior to initiating any construction activities. • In accordance with the Jefferson County Unified Development Code,Section 18.30.080(1)(f): Clearing,grading,and construction of roads,bridges,utilities,and stormwater management facilities shall be inspected by JCPW. In order to enable the department to conduct inspections in a timely manner,the applicant shall notify the department in a timely manner regarding the project construction schedule. Typical Inspections: • Installation of temporary erosion and sediment control measures (Required) • Clearing(and Grading)and road subgrade preparation; • Placing roadway gravel base; • Placing roadway crushed surfacing top course; • Placing improved roadway surface(chip seal or asphalt concrete); • Construction of stormwater management facilities; (Required) • Final plat review. • (Additional inspections may be deemed necessary as project progresses.) • After construction is complete and prior to final DCD project approval,the proponent shall submit a letter to the Public Works Department,from the Engineer of Record(EOR),certifying that the stormwater management facilities have been constructed per the approved plans&specifications. It is the responsibility of the proponent to schedule inspections with the E.O.R.,his designee&/or qualified inspection firm(s),approved by the E.O.R.,to provide for said final certification. • Prior to final DCD project approval,the proponent may be required to submit an Operations and Maintenance Plan for the facility that is consistent with the requirements of the SWMMWW(Vol.5, Section 4.6,etc.)to the Public Works Department for review. • To ensure that the stormwater management facilities are appropriately maintained for the life of the project,prior to final DCD project approval,the proponent shall be required to enter into a Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement with Jefferson County.The Public Works Department will send a copy of the Agreement,which has been signed by the Public Works Director,to the proponent.The proponent shall sign the Agreement before a notary,file it with the Jefferson County Auditor and notify Public Works when recorded. B. Transportation Unified Development Code Requirement(s): The Jefferson County Unified Development Code,Sections 18.30.020(5),General Development Standards, states that all land use activities shall be served by appropriate transportation facilities.Transportation facilities shall be adequate to meet the level of service standards adopted in the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and the appropriate design standards referenced in JCC 18.30.080(1)(a). Page 13 JCPW Recommendation: • Public Works recommends finding that the work specifically associated with this permit is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts to the County Road system. C. Public Works Department Fees Requirement: Unified Development Code Requirement(s): The Jefferson County Unified Development Code Chapter 18.30.080(1)(u)authorizes the Public Works Department to assess fees in accordance with the Jefferson County Fee Schedule Ordinance for development review activities including application and plan review,inspections,meetings,hearings,and final review. • Prior to DCD project approval,the proponent shall pay all costs related to the Department's application review,plan review,inspections,and preparation of the Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement.In accordance with the Jefferson County Public Works Department Fee Schedule,the Department's 2014 hourly development review fee is$83 per hour. In the event that approval for the proposal is denied by Jefferson County or the proposal is not completed,the proponent shall still be responsible for paying the Department's fee. Page I4 Joel Peterson From: ev_sorensen@hotmail.com on behalf of Everett A. Sorensen <everett@streamlineenv.com> Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 10:41 AM To: Eric Kuzma; Joel Peterson Cc: Elizabeth Williams; Simon Little; marc@marchilt.com; Dominic Morrison; Wendy Davis; Bill Staples Subject: MLA14-90 Revised Stormwater Management Plans Attachments: 192 W Fredericks Steet Stormwater Site Plans, Revisions Mar 2, 2015.pdf Hello Eric and Joel, This morning I submitted to both of you, stamped & signed hard copies of the attached Revised Stormwater Plans for Dream City LLC, 192 W. Fredericks. Per previous discussions with Eric, the main revisions include: • Removal of proposed rain gardens along the southern boundary, • Approximate locations of 30 proposed downspouts and two Type I catch basins, • Proposed grading of driveway and parking area to direct run-off to an existing vegetated swath west of the existing building, • Modifications and expansions to the proposed below-slab infiltration beds, two of which are now proposed for both large greenhouses, and • Construction details of the proposed below-slab infiltration beds. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Everett Everett A. Sorensen, P.E. Streamline Environmental, Inc. 1821 Sahlman Drive, Suite B; Tampa, FL 33605 715 Grant Street; Port Townsend, WA 98368-2405 360-821-9960 1 gg m C I L rA U -I-- r O 3 -0 U (�j 1 N J N O N O a) 7\ o n> CD C U 1 (a CO t- CO J L o t o CO �Q 1 3 — '-' a0 U r to,L21 al o I-- 3 3t@ 2a'•.) I ELL .- O , ca 00 J 0 1- S W C 1 �O +. U Q7 c N 1 C '>_ >AI r 0 239 6 E l' D u- a) Ln J ; f1 cn app ! cn � � I1 _ N I 1 O I..L co E �� w 1 J i o C > C) ZZ @ Proposed 137x24'Greenhouse 3 I ` N p O Z 9 M ' ' ' Impervious Area=3,168 SF u, I L+ tl N a) o a Minimum of Two 6"Roof Downspouts m LL w 1 cC d7 L N ., -Z.., 1 m U N f h I �(!) as I 0 (a m _� I 17 aoQ m 1 . 0_ a r -0 a) . 8 � .0 1 O C � "- (0 ami I- D I Proposed 132'x72'Greenhouse 2 0 m N 3 I m (6 w it- 0 o t I I Impervious Area=9,504 SF - " a 0 I Cl- = N 2:- > - , ' Six 6"Roof Downspouts o IS S w' o I 0 0 O 0 0 Cl- - O i'1 I _0 /f w Y a)2 J -o O CD co ,c (a 1 3 N E a) a) e t i I o f/)'NO O QC �_ c toCli) CO I~. I Om � a ~ 5 `= 0 L � , ns N a) T— moWQ-1nI a) E oa) = cam,• U ',L- IT, coop .o' I owWNH •0CI- i I oac L ) 7 N W 200 ft _ ; I I E L �; 1‘ \ 6 ci. o ' I o t1 and o5 } E O- 1: Proposed 32'x72'Greenhouse 1 0, o 0 m :a oa N o / •X o,Q ' I I. .P� ImpevousArea=9,504 SF omy� o'� � •g$ c 3`" I O - -0-.S •i I Six 6"RoafDownspouts FL Q.-c' m^� o� a w . ` I , .- o_r L0 o ,...`og Q - 00I aLi(.0 oQ2 - 2 I - (0 0 _- - - W -.y-o ' o (p/ a J I a) �� 3 N I+- I o v �l �0i� ta_.�AI rsi 0 .• m2 � ��' I Ln- 00 I I • mY O w a O E r I - O I I 1%slope -ao� o, 2 E� , I U — r = °' I t5. oc m � cp �N� I N o c o 0 a 0 > 2 coo cT \ aj� co pu) a) a) Q I ,- o — CD I .N� mE rO g L� Ofn I LL 0_ 43 '�, N I LI1 .E 00 u, 3 a) Q, 1 r wa; V xy mm oa, m a�F.1 - u I 'X $b --- r-- c - 10 I Wm -=t/ oa, (ro, o I I I N I I - - ° rn Vk YID 1 8`0 /�_,� L i� I I yC O Q ( 30' o I 4,�•� -- —�— OLu to - � � 5 Ca E ��-- _ �1'S ~r i`�� y I U - C C co b w C , 1'.M1lope '_ � T 1C' — 8 C C E M 0m �__ Im 2 ; 0 n . 1- > N C� —2O9'_. � � 7oL a _ 1� .i2 '5 ,1) ; Q o - x-17 {�{66�� � a �o� � m m 1?� to ASN -o E) 4- a) c60d (n Cly u E g Ic O > c 2 RL z 8,a 0 o1U Z � � n g o Y 0 > 0, L5 w w� a) m 2 Om o 0.5 cv >.°C +�-' ` Ca as @ N UL 'N m 2. X 0 C g ©-0 S 2 ti�• E ��al � 0) v Z� W� IW 3 m0 a/ ,°� w O 2 70 > 2 Qp,, c ,.,„7, n C r N 2 1A a) t CL CO > > �a aj .N tn ppm Din r; m 0_ O:(1) 8p> w Existing Drained Impervious Surface Areas Area Square Ft Comments Existing Building 2,592 Currently dispersed along buiding perimeters Existing Driveway 4,400 Currently dispersed along perimeters Existing Total Impervious Area: 6,992 Parcel Area: 84,593 Existing Impervious Coverage: 8% Proposed New Drained Impervious Surface Areas Area Square Ft Comments Existing Building 2,592 Dispersed along building perimeter Revised Pervious Driveway & Parking Lot 7,200 Gravel, semi-pervious pavers or porous concrete 16 Downspouts tight-inged via 4" PVC to catch Proposed Buildings A&B 14,000 basins, tight-lined to below-slab infiltration beds Three Proposed Greenhouses 22,638 14 to 16 downspouts tight-linged to southern catch basins or norhtern infiltration trenches Proposed Total Impervious Area: 46,430 Parcel Area: 84,593 Proposed Total Impervious Coverage: 54.9% Proposed New Building Roof Areas: 36,638 Prescribed Downspout Flow Infiltration 2 200 60 SF of infiltration trench or bed area per 1,000 SF Surface: of drained surface *Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, 2012; Design Criteria for Infiltration Trenches,pages 3-5 through 3-7(PDF pages 441-443;60 SF of infiltration trench or 90 cubic ft of drywell per 1,000 SF of drained surface,for medium sands. Prepared by: Everett A.Sorensen, P.E. Impervious Surface Inventory Streamline Environmental,Inc. Dream City LLC 715 Grant Street; Port Townsend,WA 98368-2405 �,y everett@streamlineenv.com;360-821-9960 192 W. Fredericks Street Revised February 24,2015 Port Townsend, WA 98368 STREgUVILII ENVIRONMENTAL Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 Drainage Analysis and Stormwater Findings Dream City LLC 192 W. Fredericks Street; Port Townsend, WA 98368 Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 Parcel Area 84,953 SF (1.9 acres) Surface Gradient The site is very gently sloped, with the overall gradient downhill to the central northern area of the parcel, at slopes varying from 3 to 6%. Vegetation Undeveloped portions of the site are fully vegetated with mature plants, shrubs and trees. Soil Types Soils are generally sandy and appear to be very well-drained. The soil evaluation reported in the 2001 septic system design indicates generally highly-permeable sandy soils,with evidence of historical prolonged saturation at depths varying from 4 to 7 ft below ground surface. A soil test boring conducted by Streamline Environmental, Inc., on September 13, 2014, indicated medium-grained sands to at least 4 ft below ground surface. Surface Waters/Surface Flows No indications of surface flow were observed on the site or in the immediate vicinity. Downstream Analysis The ground surface generally slopes toward properties to the north of the subject parcel. The greater vicinity slopes generally to the northeast and east No DNR streams are reported within 4,000 ft of the subject parcel. While no indications of stormwater surface flow were observed at the site, there is a drainage gully to the north of the site, centrally-located, that appears to convey stormwater flow during peak flow conditions. However, no indications of erosion or channeling were observed in this gully. Existing Development includes a 2,592 SF building and an approximately 4,400 SF gravel driveway. Existing Stormwater Management Facilities No enhanced stormwater management facilities currently exist. Proposed Development includes constructing a 12'x116' emergency access drive at the east end of the parcel, constructing two 7,000 SF buildings and constructing three greenhouses totaling approximately 23,000 SF. Stormwater Management Strategy Full on-site infiltration of stormwater should be feasible. Proposed Downspout Flow Infiltration Downspout flow from the two proposed 7,000 SF buildings, each equipped with at least 8 roof downspouts, would flow to Type I Catch Basins, in turn plumbed to the two proposed below-slab infiltration beds, as shown on the Revised Site Plan with Proposed Stormwater Management Facilities. Seven or eight southern downspouts from the proposed three Greenhouses would be tight-lined to the Type 1 Catch Basins, also shown. Seven or eight northern Greenhouse downspouts would be tight-lined to the proposed infiltration trenches along the northern boundary, also as shown. These infiltration units are sized as prescribed in Ecology's Stormwater Manual, Section 3.1.1 Downspout Full Infiltration Systems(BMP T5.10A), in the Design Criteria Subsection. All three infiltration units would be equipped with emergency overflows leading to the natural site overflow at the north boundary. Proposed Vegetated Swale for Parking Lot& Driveway Run-Off The proposed expanded parking area and existing driveway shall be graded at 1% to direct run-off south and west (as shown on Site Plan), toward the existing vegetated area west of the existing building. This vegetated area already has a slight slope to the north. Slight grading adjustments to this area, completed during grading activities according to conditions encountered, shall be completed in order to prevent off-site flow from this vegetated area westward (toward neighboring parcel), and eastward (toward the existing building). At least 70 ft of vegetated path will provide natural filtration and treatment of stormwater as it soaks into the ground. Prepared by: Everett A.Sorensen, P.E. Stormwater Findings and Streamline Environmental, Inc. Recommendations 715 Grant Street; Port Townsend,WA 98368-2405 everett@streamlineenv.com;360-821-9960 Dream City LLC March 2,2015 192 W. Fredericks Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 STREAMLINE ENVIRONMENTAL Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 15 mil PVC vapor barrier Reinforced Concrete Slab 2"Extruded Polystyrene Insulation Class C Non-woven Filter Fabric J 1 From Catch 1��' Basin To Emergency Overflow Coarse Drain Rock 'erforated Sched 40 PVC Influent Pipeline Undisturbed (or equivalent thick-walled pipe) Trench 1.5 to 3" Sorted &Washed Native Soil Infiltration Bed Cross-Section ) >1' t Side View and End View -\h--0 t >2' Not-To-Scale 1 8' Infiltration Bed Suggested Installation Sequence: 1. Prepare level surface to bear slab of greenhouse (excavate to native, or fill with suitable material to 90%compaction). 2. Excavate horizontal infiltration bed volume (8 ft wide by>-2 ft deep by 100 ft long) in the center of greenhouse footprint Excavate trenches at both ends of infiltration bed, to depths of about 12 inches ABOVE bed bottom to accommodate influent and effluent piping. Influent trench shall slope at least 1% toward infiltration bed. Effluent trench shall slope 1% from infiltration bed. 3. Line excavation with a Class C geotextile filter fabric, or equivalent, taking care to avoid punctures and void spaces. 4. Place washed 1'%"to 3"drain rock to depth of at least 12". 5. Install 6" schedule 40 PVC non-perforated pipe from upstream catch basin to infiltration bed, transitioned to 100 ft of 6" schedule 40 PVC perforated pipe on drain rock in bed, transitioned to non-perforated 4" schedule 40 PVC pipeline to system overflow. 6. Cover perforated pipe in infiltration bed with drain rock to match grade surrounding bed. 7. Cover influent and effluent piping with coarse sand. 8. Cover entire infiltration bed with Class C Non-woven Geotextile filter fabric, or equivalent. 9. Lay insulation such as 2" extruded polystyrene board. 10. Cover insulation with 15 mil PVC liner(vapor barrier). 11. Prepare to pour slab (install re-bar, radiant heating tubing, etc.). Cross-Sections of Proposed Greenhouse Drawn by: Everett A. Sorensen, P.E. Below-Slab Stormwater Infiltration Beds Streamline Environmental, Inc. 715 Grant Street Dream City LLC Port Townsend, WA 98368 192 W. Fredericks Street everett@streamlineenv.com 360-821-9960 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Revised February 24, 2015 84,953 SF (1 .95 acres) Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 SEP02-111 ZON14-45 MLA14-90 srF:Nu Joel Peterson From: Eric Kuzma Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 2:32 PM To: Simon Little (simon©studio-stl.com) Cc: Joel Peterson; Everett A. Sorensen Subject: Dream City LLC Stormwater Permit clarification Attachments: SW Comments-PH1.pdf Hi Simon, Attached are the comments I prepared and submitted to DCD for the Dream City LLC Stormwater Permit, Phase 1. Understand that these were recommendations that Public Works made to DCD and the only items that are binding are those included in the actual permit language issued by DCD. I am copying them to you in hopes that they will provide some additional clarity to the issues we discussed. Note that the comments include specific DOE SWMMWW code references which were provided in an attempt to help streamline the process, since they were absent in the TESC/SWPPP materials that were submitted. Keep in mind that Public Works role,for lack of a better term, is that of a technical consultant to DCD. I will however attempt to clarify the Stormwater Permit process as applies to this project. There will only be one Stormwater Permit with its standard requirements. The Stormwater Permit was divided into two Phases at the request of,and for the benefit of,the applicant. (That is from a construction sequencing standpoint, to allow the applicant to move ahead with (the Phase 1) clearing and grading prior to having all of their Building Permit(s), including their full Stormwater Permit, (Phase 1 & 2) in place.) The Stormwater, Phase 1 requirements have been reviewed and approved, thereby allowing Clearing and Grading to commence. The complete Stormwater, Phase 2 documentation has not been officially received, reviewed or approved. This will need to occur before the Building Permits can be issued. I hope this clarifies things a little. Please contact me with any questions/comments. Thanks, Eric Eric Kuzma,Architect/Engineer III Jefferson County Department of Public Works 623 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 Ph: 360.385.9167 - 360.301.6783(c) Fax:360.385.9234 Email: ekuzma@co.ie{ferson.wa.us Web: www.cojefferson.wa.us/publicworks 1 Joel Peterson From: ev_sorensen@hotmail.com on behalf of Everett A. Sorensen <everett@streamlineenv.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 8:06 PM To: Eric Kuzma Cc: Joel Peterson Subject: RE: Dream City, LLC Stormwater Attachments: 192 W Fredericks Steet Stormwater Site Plans, Revisions Feb 24.pdf Eric, Here are the latest plans. I will be submitting a hard copy Wednesday or Thursday. In the meantime, if you're inclined, feel free to offer any feedback. Thank you, Everett Everett A. Sorensen, P.E. Streamline Environmental, Inc. 1821 Sahlman Drive, Suite B; Tampa, FL 33605 715 Grant Street; Port Townsend, WA 98368-2405 360-821-9960 1 T 41 N = . (n U }' CO �� T O I_m C) 4? J NCO NO0) .§ E 1.. a) co .- JAM c= CO -5a ,_ E E O 1.SQ ( . N CO Q oo aa) U_ L) op —I � U _i• +-. 0 ,:rC E 'i T o-)t.0 o o w I co a) as 4) _ .� 1- . E > � 0E N -0 'a L . O � J o _ (n ~ d W1� 1- N O -239' o / � L C � 3rnZZ CL o J N w v N v rA m Q - O Co CCS i Proposed 132'x24'Greenhouse 3 0 CL T N ' i i Impervious Area=3,168 SF a ` C 9, T o ct b I ; Minimum of Two 6"Roof Downspouts co w w c CO T Tu AI I aclu)5 m CL = N m� 3 �; I I x ' c, 00 0 a In o ; I Proposed 132'x72'Greenhouse 2 0 m r 3 co U) W a o ' •; ; Impervious Area=9,504 SF a) o ri -°o a a) -0 O (I) o:- > ',r Six 6"Roof Downspouts O rn x a o o O co .,� (6•- 'O O'De..E X13) a) .- C7 ♦' i m a N ' LL 1 CO co o CAN � o LU p aCA N Tr C r -*0 Tx) ,I L- (138 ., V a) w 3 ' - m ow0 c 1 .O o N °� o �; I NEO Nt 1- co V t 2i , In--'OCA c 050r N 0' i O w co---F- I 0.c L o , ' O- I a` X _ , / U \o N Ii 200ft _ .h 1 . � E aww --� O ✓T� 0 m CI— ,"/ I�01 o Proposed 32'x72'Greenhouse 1 m'Zc a o y N / X - cn°1 o Impervious Area=9,504 SF 0l--0 m r` 3 0 O cc �' m � - 1 Six 6"Roof Downspouts C7 u u o o= Q- \ '5-‹L. r ` I Al ,-atZ,a moo Q' - cc 3- -11 -o dd wa woo/ p Qou) - +-� n d�� �� a«' -ooE 71t 2 in— ▪� 3 I 1 yr C'�S _ -"�E m d 3 'a.Qwm Oi 4- a wZE 1- - 00 1baa Ina anE rAwas._ o o E 0 1 �ITam N �� rn d-s i C.) E - °1 CO oy� 0 / aco ~�� co t rn" I CO ao2 ar //./ .5 om2 as N O - 40 uiS ,, IIuS wN0 aQo o ) P �CC [� moi 0-CD - I r c c w 2co.- a cz o ya d i mm NI 4,0 X $b --- PP -- c _ GO I LLl CO -c7)6.5 o is 8 M = I I I Ip 1 c - ¢ N I 2y �O Allr I IJ I9_N C O W 30' F w n t_ _,�_ o w a °� II c al ISN. it '�-`'\ v o ,a° u CC ��O I U - 1 Cb'r?' Q 4z cacti xcn cam' ri.s' - CcCEu1 Cto cgw m 1c = 3 0 —oa ? _ - n = o � c Ii � � 0 Q Lt c i� '„209 L H Zii I - Q E 0_16- d N t_zi, a m 948600201 a o /u I' o— ' .E ` a 0)a a) wZ m c > cE1a2 C 3 3 c _ m_ C >_ I._ wwCO ,- co O N 3 47 I ry ;., N IL c lJ �m v. O^ W o Iw m ,- R @a I mCoN °_ w 0 CO .0 ase@ = R § /3 $ k5 { / 2 \ ! / g { < f § ) ! c - 9 ° ° _ \ § � ® k kk ) ko0 % / � \ � O- E' i k \ - f ; - $ � 2k3 « # ' ° 5 � /k Co 4 § j / ■ 2kk ) = : \} J 0) eo E � k E0 _ - k\6 C ,- _ c _ m 00 o_ F2 ° 0 CL � � ° \ / \\ \� - k - _ ' t 3 § { f &\ § / - C = '' ® + � ` A -E$ �D \ - « <#! ` 4- (0 , Ecn ) CO \ } , , el )\ , } \ } « o w - sirw , ( } % 46 cs9 J - a) 7 co f z2 j � � , ) \ ( 075 92 \ ( \ k k {} 0 COo ) | o ® » ® J/ § ! 7 \ 2 0 \ ta— /0 { ) & § f ) - ® : �§ k - - ( Co \ k \\) } -6 £ { R 6 co { \ \ CO k 1 //f ;f ! wigg- ) { ( ) i _- : 7 E ; 7 _ _ - ] 36 _ \ \ { 2 11 } /\ -k � § \ \ 0 \ / k� ”S@-a CO 3 z z CL J . w ; }\\§j _1. o CD-8 coycE7$ c d Co O$ aY . cN3'2_ da • O -J d m m .. do - .0coW jO 0Ot- C 8dy8 a) C 0 3 L C.) VD N ' Ly ' yCa) NQ co W CR . W... O 3a53 4.1' = o_• a0 E v 01E cRo o a)i -ai �= cme moayy c bmc O 0 CD O .a 0 aye E od W W ` U v - ` LLC •g o E ='4 d m L .-o g-. 1cd O c OW a CC j dM Cyn. L645 Z C cU o WCWd C a Od - CrE .Z W daom 3Ni_5 .c -o • aA €t" ad ' FE ` ca CI c..1dm oO. CN - • 0 8.4UCCLZri i L 04 Tu 1_8 O � LNdOa > U ) R . J >- 2 On $ .�33i N p y t yc -. = d ma 'Oa0- C.TG L C C° 6 d 733m� Ea Na) a � 0 ' r �a .NG R ° ya� O pyCco. atqqO o` am O R0. 00 O NWN 'Oy d $ N d UO'2 2 Fr o mR °� oCD a � iCO O Rc ' s616 � cymoo-. L `arE ya0Eg£ � aa. f `aaE nR 3 0, . 4c T 10 a S o o ai? - o V n o Ec o ct-VecR N a) � oR dyr, E �Zw.4'�o J $ W WZ c N w yocomol o cyWd 0 d 3 Z �Z La 0) L a) � rW O^'y d'W R O oi � C y .. O•N as 0m-0-0 T = � cm .9 R.yc ° 0 so co t.oY e JLeoo- y" C rw2 gH e .2lp 'O ZQ dy 'O W• ' an 0a ?mQ.0g 0p0 0� N �NVT 0 Z C Yc-� 0 .Co el0c. W8.dNCWR'tt W O� 3 d cE ' 2N6, y LL2Cm 'cCyCHcoC VWp 3 0y52 a OO C d c 'h JCR O N' C _ C O1 'O CO • a) 2 = $ LL ._yd7 aW 0N oH .c 0,cc mu' O o.0 � c v a E ' o d . = 8 $ �dto $ $ (0 f H cT0oo . aw � g 0_ 7 a >o y `vE O7.N 0-a, W C 4 E.g% OJ3 $ 0 ul Z co r >'N `mom too 0 " (/I 000 � 0 odkIj(n -a J d co E CO A o o e a y = a) } 00 0 r • 0 0 8 0 0 m z-)(J) as f6 0 `- .0 —ca U a _ R d 0`� CO a (O I co Q ,_ ..-....„..0 o -a) A E L w v �> V •, CO L5 d4 0 3 C8C > co 0 a-. ` �O l E O N c W 0 R15 o dEw, -o oa /� LL co �A e 0 0 L o rno y co .yam V +—' )- O !� v 0 3 day 8 :3'02 > -.2 8 = � � ZZ L c Z o R i L 0 nw N L N O •R N 0 �CD yR nYO� a oD Q � � � N 'i NN O O C �y _TR a 0 R £ R: C c a) D 8 4H C fo v 0 . (S m 3 �p 3 8 cc 2 `o o D oi R a �so 0 o-0 Y a o w a C/) c WU w �'�.► a "mD a=3 0 Y'" a 0 O �d N O t' Lrl �a� aDi E L 'a+ (6 1- a a) 0 .� R co a) `�c m ,c a mM o V o i [0N v .—aa) w I) .a) a �� Uy0 .� N NLN Q . �R E N vj .. 7 a N.. O N O.ro, O N 2 (n 4 ,-- 8 8x 3 0 o n M E. 2 D a) o t c OL m "/�\ ahaco- .Qo R c 0 \� N a) c c E a y n m c 3 `o Z -) j R 0co CO (n > O 2 =2 o z a) m m D 8 U >, 0 R 0 N -O a)) � Co Z. 2 N O D n L 0 Tr, LE) ,_- 11') o 2 .o 0 LU o :a a aa,,..-c d L) • o o 3 U D V a c �� ao w RaOa) - 2 ca) c _ca > W �I o y� U c d c w c y? U o 0. m D a .- D_ U a -00 a N al 'D R c= 0 R c 0' = a �' x Y) c 8 a Z m 3 a, N �+ O- R L D c aI E y a) U O c - Z o ,F f., U a� S j a N r m E in O > COR O� C y L 0_ (O p � 0) & -°•.8._ L_. r0 Tr€ S.y O R N O:a co 8 O c D 'Rt cma 3 a. as (� 3 y U aa)i m e N CU a= cp N 0 N ty C N = aU 0 R C 0) A C Q = N d o C _ `w G iI1!!Ifl ! 40U !1j<aOU c ~ wN- CO'c m . c-'oE o 0 o m U a _,:a 0E - 0 = e40 m D 2 _ 0_ w O n E _ a m.. 0 0 0 3 R U~ 2 a0 y w x"-o vi. o . R 2 (oc do -. - .- 5,140.=...- co In y y (O 1,- CO QI 0- 0(I) n 0_ a)M 0_' Joel Peterson From: ev_sorensen@hotmail.com on behalf of Everett A. Sorensen <everett@streamlineenv.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 5:26 PM To: Eric Kuzma Cc: Joel Peterson Subject: RE: Dream City, LLC Stormwater Hi Eric, Thank you for the message, and your ongoing assistance. We've pretty much decided to eliminate the rain gardens along the south boundary, and to add another below-slab infiltration bed beneath the western greenhouse. The two below-slab infiltration beds, together with the string of infiltration trenches along the northern boundary, would be sized per Manual prescription, to accommodate all 37,000 SF of new roof area. All of these infiltration units would be equipped with emergency overflows tight-lined to a rip-rap-lined outfall positioned roughly mid-way along the northern boundary, at the site's pre-disturbance surface overflow. We now have the greenhouse end gutters on-site, and so I understand better their configuration. Greenhouse downspouts will only be at the greenhouse ends, both north and south. Are there any other issues that you've identified, that we need to address in our revised stormwater plans? Thank you, Everett Everett A. Sorensen, P.E. Streamline Environmental, Inc. 1821 Sahlman Drive, Suite 6; Tampa, FL 33605 715 Grant Street; Port Townsend, WA 98368-2405 360-821-9960 From: ekuzma@co.jefferson.wa.us To: everett@streamlineenv.com CC: JPeterson@co.jefferson.wa.us Subject: Dream City, LLC Stormwater Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 01:02:48 +0000 Hi Everett, As mentioned I spoke with Joel Peterson today. I offered to contact you to discuss the Stormwater 'Phase 2' Permitting. 1 In short, as you and I have discussed previously, the previous application satisfied the requirements of the Phase 1 ' Clearing& Grading' portion of the permit,but did not include much of the information needed for the Phase 2 portion. Please contact me with any questions regarding this, otherwise we will await your submittal. Thank you, Eric Eric Kuzma,Architect/Engineer III Jefferson County Department of Public Works 623 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 Ph:360.385.9167 - 360.301.6783(c) Fax:360.385.9234 Email: ekuzma@cojeferson.wa.us Web:www.co.ieferson.wa.us/publicworks 2 Joel Peterson From: ev_sorensen@hotmail.com on behalf of Everett A. Sorensen <everett@streamlineenv.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 5:26 PM To: Eric Kuzma Cc: Joel Peterson Subject: RE: Dream City, LLC Stormwater Hi Eric, Thank you for the message, and your ongoing assistance. We've pretty much decided to eliminate the rain gardens along the south boundary, and to add another below-slab infiltration bed beneath the western greenhouse. The two below-slab infiltration beds, together with the string of infiltration trenches along the northern boundary, would be sized per Manual prescription, to accommodate all 37,000 SF of new roof area. All of these infiltration units would be equipped with emergency overflows tight-lined to a rip-rap-lined outfall positioned roughly mid-way along the northern boundary, at the site's pre-disturbance surface overflow. We now have the greenhouse end gutters on-site, and so I understand better their configuration. Greenhouse downspouts will only be at the greenhouse ends, both north and south. Are there any other issues that you've identified, that we need to address in our revised stormwater plans? Thank you, Everett Everett A. Sorensen, P.E. Streamline Environmental, Inc. 1821 Sahlman Drive, Suite B; Tampa, FL 33605 715 Grant Street; Port Townsend, WA 98368-2405 360-821-9960 From: ekuzma@co.jefferson.wa.us To: everett@streamlineenv.com CC: JPeterson@co.jefferson.wa.us Subject: Dream City, LLC Stormwater Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 01:02:48 +0000 Hi Everett, As mentioned I spoke with Joel Peterson today. I offered to contact you to discuss the Stormwater `Phase 2' Permitting. t In short, as you and I have discussed previously,the previous application satisfied the requirements of the Phase 1 ' Clearing & Grading' portion of the permit,but did not include much of the information needed for the Phase 2 portion. Please contact me with any questions regarding this, otherwise we will await your submittal. Thank you, Eric Eric Kuzma,Architect/Engineer III Jefferson County Department of Public Works 623 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 Ph:360.385.9167 - 360.301.6783(c) Fax:360.385.9234 Email: ekuzma@cojefferson.wa.us Web:www.co.)eferson.wa.us/publicworks 2 Jefferson County Department of Public Works '! 623 Sheridan St. . tli , Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 385-9160 Monte Reinders, P.E. Public Works Director/County Engineer Date: 1/26/2015 To: Joel Peterson,DCD From: Eric Kuzma,JCPW Project: Dream City LLC: (ZON14-00045/MLA14-00090),JCPW Project#(94014090) Subject: Development Review: Stormwater Management review:Phase I-Clearing&Grading APPLICATION REVIEW A. Stormwater Management Unified Development Code Requirement(s): The Jefferson County Unified Development Code,Sections 18.30.060,Grading and excavation standards and 18.30.070,Stormwater Management Standards both set standards for erosion and sedimentation control and stormwater management. The code adopts the requirements set forth by the most current version of the Washington State Department of Ecology,Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington(SWMMWW). ,TCPW Findings: The proponent has chosen to divide the Stormwater Permitting into two phases. Stormwater Phasel - Clearing&Grading.(Future)Stormwater Phase 2-permanent Stormwater facilities,etc. Per the SWMMWW the project is classified as"New Development"given that it will further develop a site that has less than 35%existing impervious coverage.The project will also create more than 5000 sf of new plus replaced hard surface area(which includes pervious pavements).Given this criteria,the proponent shall comply with Minimum Requirements#1-#9 of the SWMMWW. To demonstrate compliance with Minimum Requirements#149 the proponent has submitted the following: - A Jefferson County Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Template,which also includes a Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)Template(date stamped 10/29/14). - A(3)page submittal including Drainage Analysis&Stormwater Findings,and SWPPP/TFSC Notes (dated 10/29/14)as well as Existing&Proposed Surface Area Calculations(revised 1/19/15). - Drawing Sheets,including:Site Vicinity Map,Site Plan w/Existing Conditions,Proposed Preliminary Site Plan,Site Plan with Temporary Erosion&Sedimentation Control(all dated 10/29/14)and a Proposed Stormwater/Septic Site Plan(dated 12/11/14). Page I 1 The above referenced documents were prepared by Streamline Environmental(and Studio STL(prepared the Proposed Preliminary Site Plan).) The submitted Construction Schedule specifies work could begin in late 2014(Ph. 1)/early 2015(Ph.2). (Note that the above construction phases are not associated with the phased Stormwater Permits.) The Site is zoned as"Light Industrial",in which the JCC allows 55%max.impervious surface coverage. The currently proposed percentage is 54.1%(all hard surfaces including total roof area). Per both the Soil Survey of Jefferson County and the Natural Resources Conservation Service(see attached), the soils on-site are mapped primarily as(HuC),Hoypus gravelly loamy sand with a permeability of 6.3-20.0 inches per hour,and(CfD)Cassolary sandy with a permeability of 2.0-6.0 inches per hour. A soil evaluation was also performed in both 2002 and 2014. For the purposes of the Stormwater,Phase 1 -Clearing&Grading Permit,Public Works is only formally commenting upon the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan(SWPPP)Template and Temporary Erosion&Sedimentation Control(TESC)Site Plan. Stormwater Phase 1-Clearing&Grading,JCPW Reconunendations: • The proponent shall install the stormwater management facilities and implement the Best Management Practices(BMP's)in accordance with the SWMMWW and as specified in the Stormwater Site Plan&associated Construction Documents prepared by Streamline Environmental. - High Visibility Fence to be installed per BMP C103 (as required to protect septic and stormwater facility components) - Stabilized Construction Entrance to be installed per BMP C105 (at the existing site entrance as well as at the proposed Louisa Street entrance if it is utilized for construction access) - (Straw)Mulching per BMP C121 - Protect/Cover Stockpiles per BMP C123 - Be prepared with"Materials on Hand"per BMP C150 (in particular as needed to prevent erosion of north-central drainage gulley) - Concrete Handling per BMP C151 - Material Delivery,Storage and Containment per BMP C153 - Certified Erosion&Sediment Control Lead(CESCL)per BMP C160 - Silt Fence to be installed per BMP C233 (The plans show Silt Fence along only a portion of the north property boundary.The narrative specifies that silt fence will be installed along the down gradient perimeter of development activities. Installation of Silt Fence in other locations may be required to prevent sediment from leaving the site.) • All temporary Erosion&Sediment control measures,and protective measures for critical areas and significant trees,shall be installed prior to initiating any land disturbing activities. • Prior to commencing land disturbing activity,the proponent shall notify JCPW. Page l2 • In order to ensure that stormwater management facilities are constructed per the approved plans the proponent shall request inspections by the Public Works Department during construction.In order to enable the department to conduct inspections in a timely manner,the applicant shall notify the department in a timely manner regarding the project construction schedule. Typical Inspections: • Installation of temporary erosion and sediment control measures (Required) • Clearing(and Grading)and road subgrade preparation; • Placing roadway gravel base; • Placing roadway crushed surfacing top course; • Placing improved roadway surface(chip seal or asphalt concrete); • Paved Road Approach • Construction of stormwater management facilities(prior to backfill); (Required) • Final plat review. • (Additional inspections may be deemed necessary as project progresses.) Public Works Department Recommendation(s)to be applied to next phase of Stormwater Review: • After construction is complete and prior to final DCD project approval,the proponent shall submit a letter to the Public Works Department,from the Engineer of Record(EOR),certifying that the stormwater management facilities have been constructed per the approved plans&specifications. It is the responsibility of the proponent to schedule inspections with the E.O.R.,his designee&/or qualified inspection firm(s),approved by the E.O.R.,to provide for said final certification. • Prior to final DCD project approval,the proponent shall submit an Operations and Maintenance Plan for the facility that is consistent with the requirements of the SWMMWW to the Public Works Department for review. • To ensure that the stormwater management facilities are appropriately maintained for the life of the project,prior to final DCD project approval,the proponent shall be required to enter into a Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement with Jefferson County.The Public Works Department will send a copy of the Agreement,which has been signed by the Public Works Director,to the proponent. The proponent shall sign the Agreement before a notary,file it with the Jefferson County Auditor and notify Public Works when recorded. B. Public Works Department Fees Requirement: Unified Development Code Requirement(s): The Jefferson County Unified Development Code Chapter 18.30.080(1)(u)authorizes the Public Works Department to assess fees in accordance with the Jefferson County Fee Schedule Ordinance for development review activities including application and plan review,inspections,meetings,hearings, and final review. • Prior to DCD project approval,the proponent shall pay all costs related to the Department's application review,plan review,inspections,and preparation of the Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement.In accordance with the Jefferson County Public Works Department Fee Schedule,the Department's 2015 hourly fee is$83. In the event that approval for the proposal is denied by Jefferson County or the proposal is not completed,the proponent shall still be responsible for paying the Department's fee. Page I3 o�? - _ ADJACENT LAND U5E:RESIDENTIAL N -t <C � (\ T • ? `. PROPERTY LINE • 268.64' . N b -TYPE'A'LANDSCAPE SCREENING 11 41 F' p{U� --- SIDE YA'i. _ K I O 1 I 1I Z U —� �- . I PROPERTY A� 4:: u . If `w� I /I LINE•90.00' iI D I I• AFI R J b �8Q /� Ai ` 5._ . O •r \ „ 725, a --`-/- T�' d 1. \\ STs , • 1 . , C I • t, —P —P �z IA \ aI T/ N. Y of �, 3 Q(// NG ?g,_ 1 y / 50.0'\ R ��NG',C�/y q„ \�z 1 ?-650 0 1 1 A 22'-9" S �(y 1T-Q„ _ r I \ 1\ 1 7.?S Z m $ i w a [� kil -\ -4 V.' h iriA A I 1,.\\ \\\\ \ 'a/ ro $s� I \ z \ .,. N\ i 1 Imb uT ..I I� \ ri_� \ -I \ 4 '.\ I max . A8 I -, a I 1 O �\II �xA"- 1/ / \jam__ $/ j�� � 0 �l _ .--'" I A N 4 \ "119\ I w N o 1\,„ ,eer rri HI >— \ 0 1 q\a,I0 \---„-Ntii‘ rn I 20o \ Sm(4\v 1 \j 1 \tl: v132.0'' ,5'0 n 0'-0' \�rfn 10-8” `iz O 4 0 . p4-1\71 I :1 I I \ po',01\� '�` ti PRE-ENGINEERED GREENHOUSE D r i N A 0 1 O (3)24'x132'=9,504 SOFT \ 9 N I z IP BUILDING "D" O � n1 10 X 5 0-0' \\N I - m w�' i � _, _i— - ,ds� \\\ vSo.O' ' BLD14-462 6 p 70 il \ 132.0' 25,_8,: nitil 11 d. \\A- inz .— py— .—.— .—._IN.— .—.6—.—.—._ b'-0 ' I a 4 � 132.0' t _IN — . �� I i i riy (I i \ V g 3 y � ' PRE-ENGINEERED GREENHOUSE I, ` c O\ (3)24'x132' =9.504 SOFT N T -'� 0 �.O Or 7a ft A / BUILDING "E" O I 1111 •3 1, O \ 132.0'VI I1 8 \\\: I �" ' 6 li 1,6,,s! \ z, Ahl PRE-ENGINEERED GREENHOUSE �� i T b 24-0"x132'= 3,168 SQFT N + b? \\\\\o. BUILDING "F" O -; W , ,39-0 \\12..C; \\\\\ _ i A IAm - V g 50.0 I ti I N '— o — — — — — —°b-- - -o- - -J . 1,14p,"— . b .— �.yvaP . — FIRE LANE — SIDE YAD RSETBACK it 1 — � — . PROPERTY LINE • 2b8.rr -..-. ADJACENT LAND USE:LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 9Z CA ,^ A O W o ) 41 Era 0 Ll C1 0 73 -�c < >> G (D6OQnm a J m H,m 7-g. 0.m m _ ° m ;a �i r 0o aQ opo omac a 4 i; ' n o O o u(�°��)u) N.<. N• N . _0.03 N0N7h m . � .rl C � � �� •T,I C VV m� TJX ?0 > >•omA0 �'�� z hMPd f z l� N -3. ?IL-1.a [ffl N 2 7 = iZ+•z C31 V O JJ n -ice Q II nflN? O O � I GI11 H p =" III --1 1::: ib ° U, !Rai;!rE ORRm�_s „ r-4- 0-0 -ro-0 > mi �n a�3= A Y `' DREAM CITY, _LC : 5I I t IMHKUv_MENTS 5 got- N *m CO 0m U N mSI IIIg �i Q iv � � 1. VI 0 m s " p IN' OZm o m 19 END NIDAT • 6� ( m ru N i 24 Z1501 ADJACENT LAND USE.RESIDENTIAL m m i► °% m D PROPERTY LINE 0 26064 ° °:77°:-..==',."7.,,7"..,17.777,7,771'.T7- z ..._ n � .. TYPE )+'LANDSCAPE SCREENING � IDE YARD SETBACK `1 r _ ��i, O U 1 �� g PROPERTY D s z7A O NN ''\ i iv `N'` LME A BO•• 4 ° 20 4 \ ': ,�prk .NoX4'4'" 2� 22 9 .�' V.\ ?" L 6.1 g . 2 i! I .py ,�/ de" ..1.,:! .! U 8\.! I 5Z'll\ r` r ` �i� ` �( �' O I }dd \ � `1 + btu • u � _ n ( ���.0,,,,-e". �Ir I rn A I �; k �' / — . �l 0� —f— �— J � ` :y It 2O_o„� ca 1, n�5-o” --� w �, O 132.0' 15I-O"', ::::4: 1) I g�4 lois.its‘ti,nb A 0 PRE-ENGINEERED GREENHOUSE �,6 -I (3)24'x132'=9,504 SOFT N z ' ® BUILDING "D" u m OP � 50.0' � —YVdP—. ._W6P_ O_ 1\IN\,. /a q , 9 ` 50.0' M ,` : ArAi ` &,, ,. ,s2.a' 2s-e ..,.., , :°:„ . ., 111 A -,°,, :, ! 1! cp u . f 8 132.0' - ,,, , 4 ' Ix 1N i., ,:,,,,„,„::,:„ _ :.: , 4 \ r:::°:'" j\gc6 �' N PRE-ENGINEERED GREENHOUSE " — u '• p (3)24'x132' =9,504 SOFT r qi x $ • BUILDING "E" t° ti 11\ 0 13, p ��= �"6 – 132.0' :I b • t: 0d132\'\ , e^ b rn PRE-ENGINEERED GREENHOUSE ,rn w . : , i 1 O 24'-0"x132' =3,168 SOFT IQ y l p libl 0 j BUILDING "P" O_ 1:::::. m , 39'-0" \,32.0' MI :':':' 0 k 50.0' 51, r- –– –– ft- _ - - -+ J :o-o : b Q FIRE LANE b I SIDE YARD SETBACK O 8 PROPERTY LINE ® 266.17 Z -m 1RD-13E:LIGHT INDUSTRIAL EBI CA A 'nA O W n0N) .OI O 0-607' '0 Z ifi sc.- � m'� n2 n� RIDa�.cA Cp I711 im..4 CI eV Hllll 44 .a coa;= n 6 .n �o D D t Q ON 72_o "6 O N a u = D -C v � > @ HigH n _ m DREAM CITY, LLC : SITE IMPROVEMENTS €k 5 15.-ia e� ¢ Z � Vr_1 p 0 R• e6 m3F g3 _. , 1 Dr 3ouS' �dN3 vi'a O z m A 192 W. FREDERICKS STREET aiii i 1 -I r- a. N PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 r .Dail 6-1-4 SEP14-00143 Pj SEWAGE DISPOSAL PERMIT FILE SHEET Type:\`J Review T Jefferson County Public Health 615 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend WA 98368 (360) 385-9444 PERMIT#: SEP14-00143 Date Received: 12/11/2014 SITE ADDRESS: 192 W FREDERICKS ST Revised Date: PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 APPLICANT: DREAM CITY LLC PHONE: PO BOX 1909 PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368-0062 SUBDIVISION: 9486 BLOCK: LOT: PARCEL: 948601301 Section: 16 Township: 30N Range: 1W Legal Description: EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13,LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN VA INTERESTED PARTY: DESIGNER: EVERETT SORENSEN PHONE: 360-821-9960 STREAMLINE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC 715 GRANT STREET PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: 300-SEPTIC TANK TO INDIVIDUAL SYSTEM TYPE OF WORK: MOD TYPE OF USE: COMA ADDITIONAL WORK: NONE Type Amount Paid By Date Receipt Tank or Pump Chamber $266.00 SAR 12/11/2014 153768 Total: $266.00 Parcel Tags; Description Notes Updated 1.) WSRC Coaching-Other 2013-06-12, CZ September 04, 2 Jefferson County,Deparlrnemt of Community Development .06-C j 1321 Sheridan St. Pit Townsend WA 98368. (384)379-445) 2014 SEPTIC PERMIT APPLICATION PROPERTY OWNER Dream City, LLC; Marc Hilt, primary contact MA ILiNG ADDRESS P.O. Box 1909 Port Townsend, WA 98368-0062 PHONE 360 531-0804 SYSTEM DESIGNER Everett A. Sorensen, P.E. pes finer Phones 360-821-9960 LEGAL DESCRIPTION. Sec u,_16 Townshp 30N Range 1W PARCEL 0 948601301 Subarrren Name Dui s+on Block Lots) site addressections to site 192 W. Fredericks Street, accessed off Hwy 20 SOURCE Of SEWAGEJUSE TYPE Of WORK WATER SOURCE Residential New X Tankts only X Private_ Res+denbai ADD Modrfication X Public X Commercial X E rpansron Community Upgrade _. Repair SITE SIZE ifir Acres SYSTEM TYPE Partial Repair-(tank)_(draenfteId)_ Previous Evaluation rt Corentionat Designate Reserve Area Yes 0 SEP02-111 Alternatrve X Redesign No SYSTEM DETAILS Number of ' std 240 C,itikst't t attar3t ay °ia type I sal ew[) Application Rate _9,31,i/soft/day Dronfield Lengaii ft Trench Width It Trenchl8ed Deter �n septic Tank size *1,000 gat Pump Chamber size_ ga. *Proposed Add'I Office Septic TYPE of system Pressurized Distribution with Gravelless Chambers Tank/Pump Chamber By signing the application form, the applicantiowner attests that the information prowled herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge Any material falsehood or any oniuss on of a matenai fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this appkc30on packet may result in this permit being nub and void I further agree to sable, ndernnify and hold twnsiess Jefferson County against al Iwdidres..fudgrnents, taourt costs. reasonable attorneys fees and expenses vutrc i may et any way acme against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and as employees. representateees or agents for tie sole purpose of application review and any regrwed later inspections. Staffs access and right of entry viii be assumed unless the applicant informs the County in writing at the tame of the application that he or she requires prior notice Inspections shall occur during regular business hours inial here t you require notification before entry Appeal - A person aggnewed of a decision of the Health Offioet may appeal Appeals shall be submitted to the Health Division n writing*resin fifteen days after receiving written notice of the deosion DISCLAIMER-This application is for an on-s4e sewage system that meets the state and county standards in effect on the date of application. This application for an onsite sewage system DOES NOT assure you of any other County approvals. For example, it DOES NOT GUARANTEE that you will later obtain permission to bund a permanent residence or other structure on this parcel. Any future application will be separately pidged by the Ries and taws in effect at that time a-t-c.- S- _ tz-ea•ry - Property Owner Signature Dale Mff O1,'K uDE ONLY PARTIAL— ASBUILT FINAL APPROVED INSPIPUMP TEST Pl)t ALLNOLDSO MET _ � Date 'L/L n I l' � Fee �(p Ree M /S 370$ a / 7L/ Case A SEP I'1 -UCS (y3 7r'r'F.''T a•38, -1 ",rsa t'.- pa list,}. :OR.'.-4- Sci"v. ION ''`' ` . u®i , ' ,-1J +L- 00 U r i c , ir-' ,,,P, '‘'Npf 0 -Ne < X' —I U v' •t;1 i ► C N -D '0 coN Lo L vJ X � LI- (nM � d- -._1— w • H -� o —239' rn ~ 0p UN cco co '/ ch \ o_ .-. C I o C3 I a MI i c W I o 0) I 1:r_ P a) - t � I c o I o w o o - o m 0 I Co I tJ T— x Lu ° — rn 3 � a o "co c 4� 2 g 1 E a— 43 0 r / co O❑ to X0 Q v) I L _ 7 _ \ Cl 0 � / 'aN—c m W \ ,i - o (79 w a) \ v 2pp I - oc = I 65 iO— i 1 rnr O I I SQ 0 aoi o 0 1 I X m I CO Y -o c to I o I w � ' 1 m , _ _ / ct Li) o I co r I o I I N - v c m N O I a I I LL cl o' f m O I ani I �.,. I I O— b E O I . I I CO I ce I O0 I ul cm . I1 O I X I c� CO�_ I W N I w I Q X 7 1\ I 'o 0 I IN EP Wm �� \ c cc0 1 I-. N C , w c co co i �T N � — c - cE 30' new '� ' � n fir° til `Lkp i o -C 'c l 1 c o E N il s —209' W W -a.3 Si 948600201 T °' `� N 3 mc7 18'2 E w 3 m °, m � � r) o • (n L /1 r-+ n..X i� r O C Ci J N O u) 0 O) o DEC 1 1 2i114e ° E —' `� r ,ate m � 113 - -0 a) � rn c>30 � mv- -00 i i�N '���+[ ®rc' 0 U U Y 03 co L N CO 0° � � I_�$1` , `fid° IA U a � 'i.- 0�c LU nes: Ndl a co Q) — L o m m rn D z ; 1 ' Li_N co O N Cr) Eo p> Q as iZ \ N +� • C In -' T- UJ ow� a�g1'�S �_ > C o a 5 �4d P�0 o ° A is Z O 7\1 239' \ rn °° N 2 CN L NLC) =IP o I a C C CV M0 in 1 ,, 0. • , \ _ N L +1► I - �m v m 1 17 - C w m =��� / m �u I C >i -oN n mj =0 I p co < co I- o D I o N o .- 0 o r. a, � I Cu -C N o s_ 'C �� 3 M CO c.i CO rn E c i 1 �- p c - CU - c coh- p i I V (v N • FO yN �11 yN@ Tl 1 � oQh U 1d co (n Q L- C O.'U N a u) N c I 0 ¢ as co- b *' i I o ac;v COo 0-N cI a o_ c a 1 Cl) a x w Z va)tI rna) M Q x m nn o o o f n 1 N Cn I � � ��, > a 2 I 43.) CO CD =m._� I C O I - 1W a) - a o c Cfl n I a$ a L c co I U �+ N co to r 3 N W '� 2 I $ L.L U) 0) l ao c �a - 1 C)45 CD LC N O Cl) =U•) d N ,f4)1}400 m e rQ) - - 1 N E c '' o d o as e I - =',o-� -g mim y -o� Qu E 1 *Q' � h 0.•- 0 c mE �� 0 1 R3 - c w I Cl) ' a,� o- as ca o c ° `r ( 0 0 -'Y I �o aN H ix-- vain o - V. 45 I. p� N� XD xZ u oa '-c) o Al I x w c t` I / I .yN waa)i =W Ma O m � m ii a) L - 7O - I W Il �o r d I k'i m Q 1p— c cui o . a) XanAl.,* ! r - cci a L�0 • N � I � vami a~ �� (D „ I o f m¢ V °°- a o°) a I coo as to tom 1 , ., :pm a I� o.Y o e� , D -8_8.7' Q a n N.. I m0 --413 9- --at )uSaa�i " 2Ew I - _ -0 V) b I I I 0 eL � m 0- 3 I d U O m0 1.0 F I a)aE " .. 03 o �- O- 2 o I I o 3� CO CO >, o I o c N I I 1 a� a� Ihi & a) I ill O I I I LL - ,XII U) 1, „ � � W t N X LTi I C O IL ¢ N �a) w --- .11: -- 1 g t� . li) o. � m N t 'di I - c c VD wa I M I`� 69 flu ! CO30' -1 U 209o— 47 me o= a) as ww _ a,948600201 >, o c20 Im= �a ccn a) ar `"10 VI s c E 0)0- - y IN m Ic m� m I w c 7 77 c ,---- m C L lin m (1,2in a) ki •NC I coa 0M X i) 1.X Ofn R. m0 W N o W M IW v UDC CONSISTENCY REVIEW Project Planner: Master#MLA14-00090 Review Type Project Description cm$ BLD14-00460 Building A: Pre-engineered steel building,heated. Production and support building-I-502. SEP02-00111 BLD14-00461 BUILDING B PRE ENGINEERED STEEL BLD.7000 SQ FT UNHEATED sep02-00111 BLD14-00462 Building D &-E- &F: pre-engineered greenhouses. I-502. Unheated-No Plumbing-SEP02-00111 ZO N 14-00045 I DEVELOPMENT OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARCEL FOR COMMERCIAL AGRICULTURE,STORMWATER PERMIT WITH SEPA--Dream City,LLC proposes to develop a zoned Light Industrial parcel for marijuana production at 192 W. Fredericks Street,Parcel 948601301. Phase 1 includes remodeling existing 2,592 sf building,dismantling 576 sf car port,adding 7,000 sf insulated metal building and making stormwater improvements. Phase 2 includes additional 7,000 sf building and three greenhouses totalling 22,638 sf;and addition of fire access lane. The project requires a stormwater permit, building permits,septic review and SEPA review for all phases. Primary: DREAM CITY LLC Site Address: PO BOX 1909 192 W FREDERICKS ST PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368-0062 PORT TOWNSEND WA, 98368 REP SIMON LITTLE 210 N.VICTORY AVE PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368 Project Location: Parcel Number: 948601301 S-T-R: 16-30N-1W Total Acreage 2 Legal Description EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13 LOTS 1-12 W/PTNS Land Use: 9800 VAC ALLEY,SOPHIA,ELWOOD&LOUISA STS ADJ ELWOOD=SNAC,LOUISA=QTA Flood District: Fire District: 1 Planning Area: 2 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: chool D 50 Zoning: COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: UGA Trans IN Plot plan states "property line" NAssessor's Map(Property lines on submitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the Assessor's 1/4 map) Legal Access to Property NO IN Parcel Tags or Scanned Documents c NO (j,e 1''',,i ESA's: Special Reports Nearby YES 1—] Designated Ag YES (100 Shoreline Designation: YES 2 Shoreline Slope Stability: YES )I/o{ �,, 3 -sot )�jtn2l Lr' Jc*'r'ter1 1. J Stream Type:YES CCivy, Cav^it3 FWHCA: YES CN) Wetlands: YES , Rare Plants:YES ©O Seismic: YES �l5. Landslide: YES CID Flood: YES Erosion: YES Aquifer Recharge Are . NO -5 SIPZ: ". » At Risk High Risk Coastal CMZ: on High Risk Moderate RiskDisconnected CMZ Stormwater site plan submitted:ft o N's{,] Forest Lands: YES Adjoining Forest Lands: Commercial/ Rural/ Inholding T] Mineral Lands: YES 49) -1'.] Agricultural Lands: YES "[1] Archaeology: YES �] No Shooting Zone: YES �] Stormwater: New Impervious Surface y0/7i8 Land Disturbing Activity ESA's Stormwater Req's:Min Req#2 Min Req#1 thru#5 Min Req#1 thru#10 Engineering `N.] Notice Provisions/Discl o e:Airport YES g MRL YES C Forest Lands YES NO �] Landscaping Required. No �,�e yiln N f' Gl/J Sereerj,D fT] Parking Spaces Require. NO 2 C cher /'/ k, Syvrobd 0,3124,, 1 Building Height: 35' UBC Standard ] Impervious Surface coverage percentage I'S SS- a /3 (g 5 .11- Resource Lands&Public: 10% Rural Resider al: 25% Rural Industrial: Per UDC Sec 6.7 Rural Commercial: 60% Area of Buil ng Coverage:60%in Rural Industrial Lands only r--] Total Building(s) Size: RVC:20,000 SF CC:5,000 SF NC:7,500 SF C: 10,000 All others:subject to septic&water constraints/None specified [�] Setbacks: Front: ,„ Left Side: /0 Right Side: ,2 S Rear: 2.5" Shoreline Setback: LSHA Setback: �] Road Classification: Ws ictehrick, C( 13 S l 9 pi rzer- Road Approach's E�STIN NOT REQ'D RAP SEPA Required: EXEMPT .1945 itir,e51ju,fd J Rrrr,3 net4k61- - ," h$' fJ Flood Certificate: Nle ` '[J Existing Case(s)&Condition(s): Y 5 _5-e-t i ,t/ Violations: Yes jam] Recorded Date of Subdivision: AFN Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions: ,s t h , �y 1-11.11/ <5yrs=Plat Conditions on plat or Old Ordinance Lots/Require Declaration of Restrictive Covenant YES submitted: YES NO UGA No Protest Agreement YES e: )3, submitted: YES NO Site Visit conducted C' NO 60;y0/5A1ii 114,e7 (r y I2didor''herao( "NJ Require Final Zoning Approval CZTI NO Abil,srd"p;yt-� [ ] ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan case N/AES t7' New Parcel Tags entered in Permit Plan d' , YES Special Reports Scanned N/A YES �J Title Notes Updated Parcel tags found for parcel 948601301 1.) WSRC Coaching - 2013-06-12, CZ 9/4/13 Other Parcel tags found for parcel 948601301 2.) WSRC Coaching - 2013-06-12, CZ 9/4/13 Other Parcel tags found for parcel 948601301 3.) WSRC Coaching- 2013-06-12, CZ 9/4/13 Other Parcel tags found for parcel 948601301 4.) WSRC Coaching - 2013-06-12, CZ 9/4/13 Other Associated CASES status issued finaled description 948601301 RF 2/4/2003 2/15/2008 ADD BATHROOM TO EXISTING WORKSHOP `BLD14-00467 P NEW FENCE PERMIT 8' FT TALL SIGHT OBSTRUCTED PERIMETER FENCE(I-502) BLD15-00010 A 1/21/2015 DEMO PERMIT EXISTING 3 SIDED SHED SEP14-00143 MLA02-00517 PRJ02-00159 P CARPORT BLD02-00573 F 10/21/2002 3/6/2003 CARPORT BLD02-00574 F 10/21/2002 3/6/2003 GARAGE/STORAGE BUILDING MLA14-00090 BLD14-00460 P Building A:Pre-engineered steel building,heated. Production and support building-I-502. SEP02-00111 BLD14-00461 P BUILDING B PRE ENGINEERED STEEL BLD.7000 SQ FT UNHEATED sep02-00111 `--3BLD14-00462 P Building D &-E- &F: pre-engineered greenhouses. 1-502. Unheated-No Plumbing-SEP02-00111 ZON 14-00045 P DEVELOPMENT OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARCEL FOR COMMERCIAL AGRICULTURE,STORMWATER PERMIT WITH SEPA--Dream City,LLC proposes to develop a zoned Light Industrial parcel for marijuana production at 192 W. Fredericks Street,Parcel 948601301. Phase 1 includes remodeling existing 2,592 sf building,dismantling 576 sf car port,adding 7,000 sf insulated metal building and making stormwater improvements. Phase 2 includes additional 7,000 sf building and three greenhouses totalling 22,638 sf;and addition of fire access lane. The project requires a stormwater permit, building permits,septic review and SEPA review for all phases. PRE14-00021 M 10/20/2014 Proposed I-502 Agriculture Structures. Two structures will handle interior growing operations,and will be pre-engineered metal buildings of a TYPE IIB construction. The third structure will consist of seven gutter-connected greenhouses,categorized as temporary building structures. The Existing septic system is planned to support the minimal employees.the Site has an existing PUD Water and Power Service. RAP02-00038 F 3/8/2002 12/12/2002 ROAD APPROACH&911 -W FREDERICKS ST SEP02-00111 F 6/21/2002 1/30/2008 now filed with SEP14-143 SOM024/0111 RCR 9/19/2014 SEP14-00143 P TANK ONLY to pump to SEP02-111,filed here(existing septic system serving property.) Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 1-_..9867030031_986103002.^_986703102.__N6703104: 986702001 986702908 . L I 966703004 986703001 986703110 986703101 986704202 9867042029867042019188704203 986704101 986704109 066104001 986.109004 I III 948600101 945600102 945600201 948800204 948600301 948800392 Legend - -- -......_._ ( Ci Selected Features JC Roads 948601201 948601202 248801209 Parcels-H *48601401 948601301 r- J Critical Aquifer Recharge I Areas 948601202 1 948601203 J_—__I ❑ suss=uNK —w Redenclos 8t J ■ 5ARPA•SISC II — i Elsusc _ 998601603 945801307 I I I . SARPA 945601602-948601304 948601602 —948601601 I., ■ SARPA•UNK II 1 948601701 948601702 948601609 —I sao�e�n L ra iiiI 948602805 1 948602806 I 948602701_ 702 998602601 948802602 Mee Prenced try Jdelsal Carte Cos a Sa-e,ces GIS s'..--11.1.111.1111146f1 FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Thu Feb 19 17:04:36 2015 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=4.... 2/19/2015 ��sON c06 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.iefferson.wa.uslcommunitvdevelopment �ysxjo Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcd(a)co.iefferson.wa.us SquareONE Resource Center I Building Permits & Inspections I Development Review I Long Range Planning December 19, 2014 To: ERIC KUZMA From: JOEL PETERSON TRANSMITTAL Eric, This is a stormwater permit for your review, Dream City LLC at the Fredericks Street location — MLA14-00090. I will be out of the office until December 29, and can follow-up with you then if you have questions. Thanks, Joel x457 ZoN q - 5 1N3Wd013A30,wNIW UNDO j01dJu STREAMLINE n� _ -�, nI ENVIRONMENTAL ti(OZ 6 7, 10O ji715 Grant Street • Port Townsend, Washington 98368 Phone (360)821-9960 • www.streamlineenv.com UU t► 1 �J October 29,2014 Mr. Joel Peterson Associate Planner Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Re: SEPA Environmental Checklist and Stormwater Management Plans Dream City LLC 192 W. Fredericks Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Jefferson County Tax Parcel 948601301 Dear Mr. Peterson, On behalf of Dream City LLC, Streamline Environmental, Inc. is pleased to submit the attached SEPA Environmental Checklist and Stormwater Management Plans for the above- referenced site. PROJECT OVERVIEW Dream City LLC, the owner of the subject property located in the Glen Cove Light Industrial zone, proposes to remodel existing structures, and install new structures to support a state- licensed cannabis grow operation. The full scope of proposed improvements is contingent on successful review of the SEPA Environmental Checklist. As such, the applicant has chosen to split development into two phases. Phase 1 development would occur prior to completion of the SEPA review, and includes activities that together do not meet Jefferson County's threshold for requiring SEPA review. Phase 2 development activities do trigger the SEPA review. Stormwater management plans included with this submittal are designed to accommodate the full development plans, even though some of the stormwater features would only be installed when Phase 2 is implemented. Page 2 PHASE 1 SCOPE The initial proposed project phase includes development activities not exceeding ` he thre shold above which Jefferson County's SEPA Checklist review is requi - . cEqVE • Remodeling the existing shop, • Dismantling the existing open-air garage, OCT 'L 9 2014 • Expanding and altering the existing driveway and parking i'ea . 7^LOUI0 • Clearing approximately 8,000 square ft(SF)of second-growth forest,f ppk!nm NVE oPMENT • Constructing a 7,000 SF Type IIB insulated metal operations building. PHASE 2 SCOPE The second and final proposed project phase includes development activities that trigger this SEPA Checklist Review. This phase would include additional clearing and the construction of: • A second 7,000 SF Type IIB insulated metal operations building, • Three greenhouses (totaling approximately 23,000 SF), and • A 116 ft long emergency vehicle access lane in the southeastern portion of the property. SEPA Environmental Checklist Attached is the Washington State Environmental Policy Act Environmental Checklist. The proposed project would result in the removal of about one acre of vegetation. However, no other significant impacts to local water quality, air quality, or wildlife are likely to result from the proposed improvements. Stormwater Management An engineering stormwater management for the project is included. Elements of this plan include a Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (CSPPP), Temporary Erosion & Sedimentation Control (TE&SC) notes, and plans for 100% infiltration of stormwater run-off from impervious surfaces. Additional Required Permits At a minimum, the following permit applications will be prepared and submitted to Jefferson County DCD in the coming weeks: • Building permit application for Phase 1 activities, • Building permit application for Phase 2 activities, Page 3 • A propane tank permit application, and • A building permit application for an 8' tall sight obscured fence. Please feel free to contact me, or Mr. Marc Hilt(primary applicant contact, 360-531-0804) if you have any questions regarding this submittal, the subject site, or proposed development activities. Sincerely, Stre. • 'ne Env' onmental, Inc. nnIV�nn 11 : LE erett A. orensen, P.E. i Principal Engineer i OCT 29 2014 (360) 821-9960 everett(astreamlineenv.com '� L'TY 't'Dri rl orr/FNT ATTACHMENTS Jefferson County DCD Permit Application Form(2 pages) SEPA Environmental Checklist(12 pages) Site Plans: 1. Site Vicinity Map 2. Site Plan with Existing Conditions 3. Preliminary Site Plan(with Proposed Phase 1 and Phase 2 Development,by studioSTL) 4. Site Plan with Temporary Sedimentation&Erosion Control Features 5. Site Plan with Proposed Stormwater Dispersion and Infiltration Features Jefferson County DCD Stormwater Site Plan Template (7 pages) Drainage Analysis and Stormwater Findings Impervious Surface Inventory Temporary Erosion & Sedimentation Control Notes On-Site Wastewater Treatment System Inspection Report from September 19, 2014 Copy to: Marc Hilt Dominic Morrison Drainage Analysis and Stormwater Findings Dream City LLC 192 W. Fredericks Street; Port Townsend, WA 98368 Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 Parcel Area 78,676 SF (1.8 acres) Surface Gradient The site is very gently sloped, with the overall gradient downhill to the central northern area of the parcel, at slopes varying from 3 to 6%. Vegetation Undeveloped portions of the site are fully vegetated with mature plants, shrubs and trees. Soil Types Soils are generally sandy and appear to be very well-drained. The soil evaluation reported in the 2001 septic system design indicates generally highly-permeable sandy soils, with evidence of historical prolonged saturation at depths varying from 4 to 7 ft below ground surface. A soil test boring conducted by Streamline Environmental, Inc., on September 13, 2014, indicated medium-grained sands to at least 4 ft below ground surface. Surface Waters/Surface Flows No indications of surface flow were observed on the site or in the immediate vicinity. Downstream Analysis The ground surface generally slopes toward properties to the north of the subject parcel. The greater vicinity slopes generally to the northeast and east No DNR streams are reported within 4,000 ft of the subject parcel. While no indications of stormwater surface flow were observed at the site, there is a drainage gully to the north of the site, centrally-located, that appears to convey stormwater flow during peak flow conditions. However, no indications of erosion or channeling were observed in this gully. Existing Development includes a 2,592 SF building, a 576 SF garage, and an approximately 4,400 SF gravel driveway. Existing Stormwater Management Facilities No enhanced stormwater management facilities currently exist. Proposed Development Phase 1 includes remodeling the existing building, demolishing the existing open-air garage, clearing vegetation totaling about 8,000 SF, expanding and re-grading the existing driveway and parking area, and constructing one 7,000 SF building. Proposed Development Phase 2 includes adding 6,270 SF of parcel area through the vacation of the Louisa Street ROW to the east, clearing & grading of an additional 38,000 SF, constructing a 12'x116' emergency access drive at the east end of the parcel, constructing an additional 7,000 SF building and constructing three greenhouses totaling approximately 23,000 SF. Stormwater Management Strategy Full on-site infiltration of stormwater should be feasible. Proposed Downspout Dispersal & Infiltration The two metal buildings would be equipped with downspouts with splash blocks. The ground surface would be graded and re-vegetated to route downspout flow along vegetated flow paths which should readily allow infiltration. These flow paths should be configured to allow overflows to disperse at locations shown on Stormwater Site Plan. Greenhouse downspouts would be tight-lined to adjacent infiltration trenches as shown on the Storrmwater Site Plan. These infiltration units will be sized based on guidance in Ecology's Stormwater Manual, and will be equipped with emergency overflows leading to the natural site overflow at the north boundary. ��� A. SORA, (j- f WAS/ 4 0 4r-„ #4, c_-;,T o -0 r OCT 9 ?014 1.1 o • :• . SS!" �j,,NAL TY C UINTY !r'T SOF CCMi,-UNITY DEVELOPMENT Prepared by: Everett A.Sorensen, P.E. Streamline Environmental, Inc. Stormwater Findings and Recommendations 715 Grant Street; Port Townsend,WA 98368-2405 g everett@streamlineenv.com;360-821-9960 Dream City LLC October 29,2014 192 W. Fredericks Street STREANILIN > ENVIRONMENTAL Port Townsend, WA 98368 Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 Existing Drained Impervious Surface Areas Area Square Ft Comments Existing Building 2,592 Currently dispersed along buiding perimeters Existing Garage, to be removed: 576 Existing Driveway 4,400 n Existing Total Impervious Area: 7,568 \ r� ,II Parcel Area: 78,676 'L 9 2014 Existing Impervious Coverage: 10% "SCS,COUNTY Proposed Phase 1 Drained Impervious Surface Areas G CCA, ,,ulmTv oEVE�o°HENT Area Square Ft Comments Existing Building 2,592 Dispersed along building perimeter Revised Pervious Driveway & Parking Lot 3,598 Gravel, semi-pervious pavers or porous concrete Proposed Building A 7,000 Downspout flow dispersed and infiltrated Proposed Total Impervious Area: 13,190 Parcel Area: 78,676 Proposed Phase 1 Impervious Coverage: 17% 60 SF of infiltration trench or bed area per Prescribed Infiltration Surface: 800 SF 1,000 SF of drained surface Proposed Phase 2 Drained Impervious Surface Areas Area Square Ft Comments Existing Building 2,592 Revised Pervious Driveways & Parking Lot 5,256 Counted at 50% due to pervious concrete/pavers Proposed Buildings A& B 14,000 Three Proposed Greenhouses 22,638 Proposed Total Impervious Area: 44,486 Parcel Area: 84,946 Assumes additional 6,270 SF from Vacated Proposed Phase 2 Impervious Coverage: 52% Louisa Street Prescribed Infiltration Surface: 2,500 SF *D.O.E. Stormwater Manual for medium sands *Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington,2012; Design Criteria for Infiltration Trenches, pages 441-443;60 SF of infiltration trench or 90 cubic ft of drywell .er 1,000 SF of drained surface,for medium sands. eo A. Solt �� was `k 2 Prepared by: Everett A. Sorensen, P.E. Streamline Environmental, Inc. y o Impervious Surface Inventory F 715 Grant Street;Port Townsend,WA 98368-2405 d Z Dream City LLC everett@streamlineenv.com;360-821-9960 ?S W October 29,2014 , ' F444+ 192 W. Fredericks Street fj! A,' �it� •_ ONALt Port Townsend, WA 98368 STREAN MM E Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Temporary Erosion & Sedimentation Control Notes 192 W. Fredericks Street; Port Townsend, WA 98368 Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 Mark Clearing Limits prior to removing trees and shrubs. Establish Construction Access A construction access point will be established at the existing driveway. A stabilized pad of quarry spalls at least 6"thick will be installed at the construction entrance and extending 40 ft into the parcel, to provide an area for de-mudding of construction vehicles prior to leaving the site. Install Sediment Controls including Silt fences downhill of area of proposed disturbance. Stabilize Soils Stabilize temporarily exposed soils with straw. Cover soil piles with secured plastic sheeting if soil will remain in pile for at least 2 days during wet season (7 days during dry season). Control Pollutants Prevent discharge or release of all pollutants, including motor oil and construction debris. Instruct all personnel as to this policy. Maintain TE&SC Features All Temporary Erosion &Sedimentation Control Features must be inspected regularly, and maintained & repaired as needed. Manage Project Assess conditions regularly and adjust construction stormwater management features as needed. Key references from the Washington State Department of Ecology's 2012 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington: 1. Rain Garden guidance: Minimum recommended rain garden size is 5% of drained area; Section 2.5.5 Minimum Requirement#5: On-site Stormwater Management; pages 2-28 2. Infiltration Trench Design: Section 3.1.1 Downspout Full Infiltration Systems (BMP T5.10A); pages 3-3 through 3-6. 3. Horizontal separation from dispersal components to property boundaries and structures shall be5 ft (Volume III Hydrologic Analysis and Flow Control Design/BMPs, Section 3.1.2 Downspout Dispersion Systems, BMP T5.10B, Design Criteria for Dispersion Trenches, Item 3 (page 3-12). ,: tA. sok C, <" F WAsiy ao t� 0 C i '[ 9 2'314 �{ �.• 13, uV;v I • Prepared by: Everett A.Sorensen, P.E. Temporary Erosion & Sedimentation Controls Streamline Environmental, Inc. 715 Grant Street; Port Townsend,WA 98368-2405 Dream City LLC everett@streamlineenv.com;360-821-9960 October 29,2014 192 W. Fredericks Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 STREAM Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 ENVIRONMENTAL CO 00 0 , 1:11, /1 , CO O LO N O I 2 J E M L M i • 6 > N m CO o .42 o LD c U Y Q 0• coo •- L N 4) L.L L N O V) U- in l0 Q) 1 I 300 to 1 N I Cl- al I t o_ z 4o 4 4 1r C Y 1 1 w, O I N ee Louisa Street ROW i 1 ` m I I 4- Louisa Street -► I (Proposed to be vacated) i I , �1 - - -- -- - _J II i I > d i .a I I ov � NION i_ I 1 u m Q. ,3010 S1°'e a-+ H • t �.. Q) II • o _ I `'k- 44,11. .� v .� 5 adolg%9 S 1 .W v '2 ` u_ `04,i ii-" p i c O— v - _-I , ♦ ti E = N x 1i - o O N .� I l b 1 - c ., D I + I`h I o , 3 I `f 1 0- 43 o _J I ch- c o 0 1 O U C „ e m a CV o >v a , / IA E m O c." 0 -0, ° E N d (n i E- .... - LLS .. N a a@+ V ao 7 U 1 71 N ao C 0 O • N O c Y _ °� c °� c(?) vld vs c - E +� a 3 w E' X o O v � a ',, N •R W rs :' - 0 N @ N 4 CI_ Q E `ova r i L1.1 ! ! IIfl . L1 _ TC C y -' O m N O ' , _ 3 m6 d d y Et d I e-.a I r r' o— O v� a' JEFFERSO.4COUNTY ^EFT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT +_ 00 m ci ge Z rn O O � 4y d 00 O V Y CO LO dA d . `'dv1 . �. 0 c Lo _o 1h X L0 LLI o r•-• rn H` L u 30' ra a a ____k___________________ IA D I 209' / o L'' L I UCZ O 1 d 7 I 6: m 1 O N I t./)00 1 v OI ti 0 N _ O O I i Op c c o 1n— c 00 w w �� v - U cu I - O� \\ -_ ----. ca OL I "a - -I -f-'I p) I @ w / (....) I • c x v I OOG O E t o o c o �I' -1m1-0 � a I /1 tc c r ..- . I N .. n. \ Q V1 1 j \ m / W N !I a - O O k.c. I C7 \ ./. I Q _ ° _ _ N O -- I w ` / I v LL7— '2 3 w C7 � � O N - a)II 000/00:11":„.....2\ z co L -! 4 l"'I 0 ( I l I C G o z / I L c co p I I / / I I LL O N 2 / I 0o I l v � � I I �'CO � aL al '`� I I '� `-. 'a ' j °� rn = 1 ul X 7 \ Q I my W m \ . c a O I ¢ E a d Q m C 0 • m 's v £ � 209 OCT 9 Lf- I' w w 948600201 I m EFI L;;a ;-1 COUNTY I 1m 2 d r--, lr r;MlINITY DEVELOPMENT O y N a', 8 CC C 0 N (0 U) O a) 0 as >+ g� �`` (6 (13 J +`' CO iL Cr) o >080 2Uin E a) c`' ,z. N� Q,?d.T, _\\ ° E0Y < 100 -J T lli In , `►1 ; ) 7 ,� 17.3 E .2o� U ti w " a V '�U - N C ow O N 4# L% . �ti' N LL UM - o o� XR� � C �E0 43 1_ ZZ o do a o U -239' I > Q rn H °° 0 ON co Z T ! i 00) r 0alCL co r T— a) I 1 \. ' •-, (1) I N c � aa) 'n I (n p C 1 .- 2 Lo N N I oM o_ C- 10 O 0 a �L nl , , , rn CO 1 1 -0 w a Q C w m2 o �mrnI - (n O ` ovo 1mm N CO _ o coCn LL CJ) Q U) (1 g 0 03 . co °' 0-- -,j,' c° L�' ° 0-_ r ma , _.a Iw N F ymCO VV+ a) a a _X i.- - 0- C c 000 om0 I- v c 1D 00aa 0-EV = •o.o c 1 r } o X0 x0 yZ` a I O t �� m ani a- ai 1 .r O ► N .c E o E __o o f fl 1 ) Il r ,� O I J w ami . d 0 1 O N KO a CO co I aoa � c iv, 1 U - iso .so_rail : I0 o ' o ,1,.„4„.„,/ 4/ O0 VG C -0L� Y I /�� — �� fir _ 1 ______ N a J 'Q O- Q) N Q E I W I I :m>Z \. 1 y O a) N y F Q) O rT.., -� m a�-Q c as a1, o /I (II O /.; 1 CJ c i�� �� N m� OU N [[ fl C 1 E Lo— I W ` J i oo= .a dN o H UE yQ in O r ���JJJ G1 �p G, IC I - a> nl 1C �c Nc ...= a) Ni' o. `tea '7�` 1 O - ,�f(7Lf(`I ram• -.a / N N W d� W M a) O 'CLI 05 m� a7 / I L .�l L,... 7 .�,, W� C7 .—O � E r a Al 0 C X 10 0 N /a) r ....L- -C :-/)),. pV [9'0 1 I 6C i ♦ o� X E • -/4 I aci Q - ^l ° `V F --- ;;#‘11•1•1;;•/°/.7. o j . Oa 70, Im N O - OE �v ii aco c �o� I c w O- 11:11 > a o a) y I CA r .�_ • a at tY rn a�m - EE. Ia Y o �,aa� a- 3 1 N •_0 - c - 1.0 oma0i ami aa) ' O ` _ N ) o I o;� C/)CO T o ` I o To m e Q o I a) O O. Al I N a`.? a.5 ami a l a o o aa'i I � ' a.° o<n cn-� *I LL O v o ,n d 7 a,_ Al 1 l() N a CO Cr V in m O` a)t-- I CCPD .) c CO o CS) N d m I co 0 al 0 - 7 O - I > I . I rn cn a U w rnN x I. -- I co - a. 3 (`')7( W a c cofa 1 'i I Fi wg I 1 I I y.`... hO 30' - - --I C a c QEoa) W M i Nal I'N hod. ca E a3i 12 a > ` E N 209 I W W 0 o z 948600201 Q , 0 o a s • 1 a = �� rc �, u I m Q CD 0 �- Irn c e z E W ca 3a _ rn c 3mC9ma co O 0 n j io c If., m In m ami .N om � Onl .in .. 1•X 0N � aa) 0 W ` 4E, W n Iw U +- o0 o N- a�L' 3 v �S 0 �l ` COH "- CO U � � a a E m w `� P,.`�y c n ,,�, (n a) (a o v- Loo > N v 0 '1t . c ,,1 a 0 E U 0 0 0 co J E ' " ' - Ne1.4 d E .` 2 U Oco in.c 1 06 N -0 'a I.- c)›. Fp N = N • ♦ O NI- 0 ; o@- Q.m �4� "Ilb 1 N (� • = M E o o- 2 1 —1--- ~ 3 a) Z Z � Ti i o a \ I N cp. N O O O -239' y i q) ' °p IV � 1 p (n oas a CL N- a \ , •-- )Q N NI S N- T N 0v) � (0 O C I �N1.0 ' ❑L` vcI 77 `9 I Q O O om o1. =r I � O -0 (.) a. m L N om► H f- a," i 1:1d < c fW c�� / r m c� = •• 0 o N _c o 10 I CO NO~ O co I p 0 p N a j 0, y I CO -- c C 3 h c O0 j Z , •GE ,,) N� _V = mII ap Nci __. c' a Div: I t i -a t t rn N O in N I• r al J d- o v . Opp mcE �ic �! >-, x "' U' I p w w N ' I H mo -+ OQm C _ _ nLfu om I- _ 1 O I oC7 0 0C-C9'-N a o °c CO I �X o n.c� = yI _-. a O)� n o °� O CL a o I = �! L� N �1 ~ I a'n'y o a E o I .p. LU I IBJ .. O N.- fd •� O -^ u.. I C x �- a O I ^, 1''" YJ `, mho + w � c M � U I I(... ICO co c : O I o_E c Nr Ce CO -o a 1 co f C- o a) 3 Nin a • 1 Np -Oi OD co C a t Oi a Y - ce -- ' I - `n oami0 ti d =a QW E I - c __�cn ai a c m~ rn� 0 t-+ I (6 0 c i1Y� r-- y �Q i N m W coo I E Lo— Y o Air rn G'o '. m d� o H - E =o N 'Al0 II r +p eco Nom❑ Xo � z a ma 3-L I p - x LL W e _o W cn a I-o�5 m !! N I Q- _ o '-, / a_ I W 0 N T a 10 c Lo W O AI CO CL C U Obi .=o r CO x n / * I a� < $ a 2- N-,,,„-) ►�� �� m av vw � I � c m / a O'2 t0 II -C my . .aN N' O) t0i I C O— /V co-c = ,� O CO y C N CO r4:11 xcz aay I � N - 1 LI a_0 ° E� la Lo c N CD L I a > /./ 0�' NQ Id - 0 7p CO 0. III � cow COCDW a ,-- 1 L = O x I -- I - � �CD aU a � W W ---�7� I o a 3 m Hd I ;le I c c m Lr N I 30' n a., „ . c m r1t7i140 E L N. W W 0 O z 948600201 co a O a m= U� CC ma ay v ,_ m 1c cm (72E e cm oc - mio cL I.- mmkna) , .X I] m I ,X c,„ 1LX (n I� W I] LU O W2 I 1r 0 01 N J N CO N c-I in 3 N.\ ,�3 0 z J v m v o +� it 00 u r-I co Q O � GOON o co +_ � rn co o N U fiej Q CO 00 m-a.c ami c-O r L j a .4 14.0. 7 0. '+v 'Z 1 4.+ 1_ -a v'f cu N cuU 3 N mZ aN >W' U N C V' 1p 1 •S= ' t� L Q) c O0 U_L to 1� pip t° H v-@om vii NQ .,�. I l6 i- a N 3 �d �t'J 5 • I o0 v ; -oI-Y �oco= QL° 4 — n z E 0 a) Y � 0~�J 0 v 3 �� I c w oc aQN o al a` E 1 c °' Al01 o- w I CO �--I t i 301 a \ I C o a -------- r 1 O - ✓ m c I i ate, } 1 C L a 1 "209' I Ill — o w Ct , r. r -- -' °C I a O CU m b •• ' I m N DO 2 Al -► �- r f+ L r I I C CO N / N u_ I r v 3 l m v 1m E a � ~ ° ..----1----._ ea NcocL. o mn I—y p -� C � N N _ C -o �� -O m0 'OO 1 i ++ o 1:-,1'7. I T N wpcII y �� -5 F 1 f0 a• Y O 'Tr , rn� 2,-E I, a� ri m� m JCL El- N I HO d N co O` fO N @ N - ++ 1.0 _ *• I ° a ° m a,CO 0 I LL l9 00 I �c�N `C)— n'oa 16 I O_ OJ 47 Z ', 1 _ 0 alNo cca CN o a.ai0 ar I 0 r I 0 L X o- L X ° -° r I `V — C r '..IW. 0_Z'-'4 Z Q.CV -0.- aJI O ON N I - -o'N'S E E o.a o I C - 444 I OJ xw a co 2 E a I �a) - w a, ° ` c 1 TA c 37) co 0 M C - oc fv CU cc'SO 03 �' �� OD co 0 nc l i I Ce 0 - E - - � ���----- -__ ) CO 111- 22 1i a) 0 iri i'1 °» =a a.)- w a J� I �1 CO�_ — N N = E 0, C O N Al �[ CO 1 03=0 xo Ca=x = . - / 4 �._ 0 Xm W m m 1 0i x1 W d D_ a L O /./ , W bDV1 AI 't 11 C Q i 44 CU C• -X �oo� Fn 2 r I m -°o //II. I O Q ° " -o m 1 0 0 N I-Il v o1- a .mo ^ 1 O ° 6OQit) v rsl I Lil - - ;[- � ° '1 I „ U c = DO a p 1 �� Qmw° aL- 0n Al J 1 � Ll) Z o u .-_ 3... I cu I ° 3 v > ° E I 1 .4 GJ c a ON a`> �m // o� i 1 0 u_ - o o m ► +I a r‘,1 2 C 1 1 - m m a Oi .y I Z , .- , I I co m W E _ I I r 0— a . m j( C W N oyT w r1' o ul F a w "R0I CO I u cl .'.. c cP, IL 0 /. ' 4-1-----. Y mI N U N M co / 1 _L---r.' '' -9_-.....---- ,7,...',,,,E..t,_.--- _,,,, ill o cf) i ' %H- 209' 948600201 a 1` > c y > Wit v I m Y 0o = `m - bp m p I ,_i or , ,ta1C9 m w w N o w II W C • _ Y U +-' CO -" 1-102l0 N OO 0GO�SN 3'l' pioY crn o� , U Y� Q • 00Os !�`� fliHw co Lo CD � � W w lD d ylNLS Oa) E LL in Z f0 ii 3 rn ~ u t v, � r-1 t' L 30' a a a L)a) i 7.•=f _- IA O c U 1,1 '� I "209' c L O ' '/ O L I v +' E ! CIJ as 'I U-a i -6 y J 4- C ♦+ 41 E I :0 0 d. W 0 v o� CO Eo v O- 1i I W V m y N _ i1 E U O 'X N ! - l7 00 I 2 v v 2 I a Q S O jl N Q a _ o N W o C O O a Ln— O I N T o 00 4-1 CV — 03 \ I% 1; 0_01 O O L) C Si •71h --- — as C Y / / l V (fin❑ W� \\ N I / .O *I 0 F+ c o)= Q +CC+ / LEL > / / X VI LL (0 C \ C //I 1:). — C O� W W N ate.) J / I Q — 0 c -- I U \\ W c '/ I Oo ro I r m� ...0. L 1rts▪ 3 co ++ > c in `` ra v I O v1ld m o VI TI) LI O I I I W V' /./1 X �"I I m V m a .2.-- I rl c I / J LO N v �' :.o <ti t o I I QeL L I v a O I z I Q a I LL o o' N 1 y I I O— a a N l0 I CD UD V"O '.I ,_ d I • I .� I -o (o 11 0 el o d 00 I _! Y -(j I N T ol T 'x I I - VI '�� ,` ON p W Wx Z m o(7;1 II W 3 W "0 0 1 ` '/ C c c c0 L / _ 1p N C N M 0 . 00W 2 ,730 O titiO ' - --- - �` O v C c/ w v/ 209' -6 - �J�' `, �'r -.. �/ N CON11.), 948600201T. IIIII, V 1 C W N CU L � � L' 1 OCT L Q 12cn IP 0 J ER______ COUN—TY�J "DE?T.OF COM !gUNIlY DEVELOPMENT 10/27/2014 Shoid Excavating Inc, POBox 179 !31 5 • Port Hadlock, WA 98339 i �`I �(`J' Lh`—, _ PROPERTYINFORMATION i—" • OCT 't 9 2014 I Location::192 W FREDERICKS STi i L% Tax ID:948601301 JEFFERSON COUNTY Mail To: CHRISTOPHER GRACE 192 W FREDERICKS ST Use: ''tr'T OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PORT TOWNSEND,WA 983684437 Owner:CHRISTOPHER GRACE ON ID:SOM02-00111 Fold • • r . . . a . • a Fold Here Inspected:09/19/2014 - Inspection Type:PROPERTY SALE - Correction Status:All corrections made Hare Company: Certification-Level 2 Work Performed By: Submitted 09/29/2014 by: Shold Excavating Inc. Timothy Johnson Timothy Johnson This report does not assure approvals by Jefferson County Public Health for ANY future building permits or development. COMMENTS&GENERAL INSPECTION NOTES Deficencies Were Noted:Corrections were made to resolve the deficiencies. Upon arrival it appears the system was never put into service.All components appear to be functioning properly once power was turned on. The effluent level dropped into operational limits once activated. GENERAL SITE&SYSTEM CONDITIONS The General Site and System Conditions were: Fully Inspected All Components accessible for maintenance,secure and in good condition: YES Surfacing effluent from any component(including mound seepage): NO Components appear to be watertight-no visual leaks: YES Improper encroachment(roads,buildings,etc.)onto component(s): NO Component settling problems observed: NO Abnormal ponding present for one or more of the disposal components: NO Subsurface components adequately covered YES Owner compliance issues noted N/A Site maintenance required(e.g.Landscape maintenance)If yes,describe in comments: NO Occupant compliance problem(occupant not operating the system properly). If YES,describe in notes: NO If deficiencies were identified on last inspection were they corrected before or during this inspection? N/A (If NO,describe in notes,NA=no deficiencies on last report): OSS Components,structures and appurtenances located per as-built/record drawing(If NO,describe YES in notes). If no as-built exists or changes made,state NO and provide record to Health Dept: Alterations made to the OSS(valves adjusted,timer settings modified,ports installed,etc.)(If YES, NO describe in notes): The house/structure was vacant or used infrequently,assessment of the drainfield was not possible. NO is the SEP case in a finaled/completed status?(if NO explain in comments) YES ONSITE SEWAGE SYSTEM INSPECTION DETAIL TANK:Septic Tank-2 Compartment This component was: Fully Inspected Component appears to be functioning as intended: YES Effluent level within operational limits(if NO explain in comments): NO Corrected All required baffles in place(N/A=No baffles required): YES Effluent Filter Cleaned(N/A=Not Present): YES Compartment 1 Scum accumulation(Inches,if other specify): 0" Effluent fitter/screen needed cleaning on arrival NO Compartment 1 Sludge accumulation(Inches,if other specify): 3" Compartment 2 Scum accumulation(Inches,if other specify): 0" Compartment 2 Sludge accumulation(Inches,if other specify): 3^ Pumping needed: NO This report indicates certain characteristics of Me onsite sewage system at the time or visit In no way is this report a guarantee of operation or Mare performance. ReportlD:399074 View inspection reports online at www.onlinerme.com Page 1 of 2 Approximate Gallons to be pumped(if needed)by Certified Pumper: 0 TANK:Pump Tank This component was: Fully Inspected Component appears to be functioning as intended: YES Compartment 1 Scum accumulation(Inches,if other specify): 0" Pump vault screen needed cleaning on arrival NO Compartment 1 Sludge accumulation(Inches,if other specify): 0" Pumping needed: NO Pump Vault Filter cleaned(N/A=not present): NO Approximate Gallons to be pumped(if needed)by Certified Pumper. 0 •oriel:Control•1 Pump This component was: Fully Inspected Panel functioning(including alarm): YES Pump 1:on minutes(override in parentheses-if present): :54 Pump 1:off hours(override in parentheses-if present): 239:06 Pump 1:gallons per dose(override in parentheses-if present): 30 Pump 1:ETM hours(override in parentheses-if present): 19:39 Pump 1:Cycle Count(override in parentheses-if present): 6 'tulip:Effluent Pump This component was: Fully Inspected Component appears to be functioning as intended: YES Controls functioning: YES Dose setting different than original(If YES,detail in comments) NO Dose setting adjusted to meet as-built/record drawing specifications(by the O&M Specialist) NO Tested gallons per minute flow: 30 grain field:Pressure This component was: Fully Inspected Component appears to be functioning as intended: YES Lateral lines flushed: YES Average squirt height(if performed)(feet,if other specify): ea' Ponding present?If YES explain in comments: NO OCT Z 9 2014 ;!w • 1r_tf[Rail':COUNTY uE CCAIrvILINIP'DEVELOPA4ENT This report indicates certain characteristics of the onsite sewage system at me time of visit.In no way is this report a guarantee of operation or Mire performance. ReportlD:399074 View inspection reports online at www.onlinerme.com Page 2 of 2 �4 ON oo DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 44. � 621 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 LA 5 Tel:360.379.4450 Fax:360.379.4451 7.11K11 — Web:www.co.jefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopmenr E-mail:dcd( co.jefferson.wa.us `1 Imo-, SNI N G Iv 11 1 PERMIT APPLICATION OCT 2 9 2014 J Steps in the Permit Process: -Review application checklist to ensure all information is completed prior to submitting applicatlorrV COP^.idiUNIP DEVEIOP"IP"T -Make sure septic has been applied for and water availability has been proven. mute. {LI -c -Make an appointment to meet with the Permit Technician by calling 360-379-4450. -This is not a standalone application;it must be accompanied by a project specific supplemental application. -Fees will be collected at intake. Additional fees may apply after review and payment is required before permit is issued. For Department Use Only Building Permit# Related Application#s: MLA# Site Information Assessor Tax Parcel Number: 948601301 Site Address and/or Directions to Property: 192 W. Fredericks Street; Port Townsend,WA 98368 Access(name of street(s)) from which access will be gained: Washington State Hwy 20; W. Fredericks Street Present use of property: 2,592 SF work shop used for miscellaneous light industrial maintenance. Description of Work (include proposed uses): Applicants propose to develop the site with new buildings and greenhouses in order to grow, harvest package, weigh and label cannabis under license with the Washington State Liquor Control Board. Wastewater-Sewage Disposal This property is served by Port Townsend of Port Ludlow sewer system? YES NO — 1 If not served by sewer identified above, identify type of septic system below: Tyoe of Sewage System Serving Property: ✓ Septic Septic Permit#: SEP02-111 rCommunity Septic Name of System: Case#: Are other residences connected to the septic system? No Additions or repairs to sewage system: None Is it a complete or partial system installation: Complete .7 Partial Has a reserve drainfield been designated? Yes _ V No Date of Last Operations& Maintenance check: September 19, 2014 Attach last report to application Describe or attach any drainfield easements, covenants or notices on title, which may impact the property: None The authorized agent/representative is the primary contact for all project-related questions and-co , ,wai . mail / e-mail requests and information about the application to the authorized agent/representativeapd', gd''(.c)\ (e er\i noted below. The authorized agent/representative is responsible for communicating the information to all parties involved th I the application. It is the responsibility of the authorized agent/representative and owner to ens'greltheir mailbox accepts Cour I email(i.e., County email is not blocked or sent to "junk mail"). p 1 I Applicant/Property Owner Information j GG 19 cU14I� Property Owner: p Y � Name: Dream City LLC; Primary Contact: Marc Hilt; P.O. Box 183; Chimacum, WA _98325,�INoE� oa��EnR Address: P.O. Box 1909; 192 W. Fredericks Street; Port Townsend, WA 98368-0062 -__ Phone#: 360-531-0804 E-mail Address: marc.h@marchilt.com 1 1 Please contact Authorized /en�e resentative with project info. (select only one). / Property Owner Signature: q �f Date: i0 i'711 )241 014 Note: For projects with multiple owners,attach a separate sheet with each owner(s)information and signatures. Applicant: Authorized Agent/Representative(If other than owner) - Name: Marc Hilt Address: P.O. Box 183; Chimacum, WA 98325 Phone#: 360-531-0804 E-mail Address: marc.h@marchilt.com L LS Professional: Is this an Authorized Agent/Representative for this project? NO ri YES I 'Nngineer I I_ Architect I Surveyor r- Contractor I I Consultant ly Name: Simon T. Little; Studio STL Address: 210 North Victory Avenue; Port Townsend, WA 98368 moi- Phone#: 360-640-8814 E-mail Address: simon@studio-stl.com �-�- Professional: Is this an Authorized Agent/Representative for this project? NO u YES Engineer ✓ Architect J Surveyor n Contractor I_ Consultant Name: Everett A. Sorensen, P.E.; Streamline Environmental, Inc. Address: 715 Grant Street; Port Townsend, WA 98368-2405 Phone#: 360-821-9960 E-mail Address: everett@streamlineenv.com Professional: Is this an Authorized Agent/Representative for this project? NO I I YES Engineer I Architect l Surveyor 7 Contractor Consultant Name: Address: Phone#: E-mail Address: Professional: Is this an Authorized Agent/Representative for this project? NO YES 1 I I I Engineer I Architect r Surveyor I Contractor I Consultant I I Name: Address: Phone#: E-mail Address: Attach additional pages if necessary Builders Statement The signer of this statement certifies that they are the Owners of the parcel referenced herein,that they are not licensed contractors an that the 'it ssuming the responsibility of the General Contractor for the proposed projec . Signature: Print Name: Marc Hilt Date: /0 !-1/P Cr f �¢$ON co DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street,Port'Townsend,WA 98368 t ti Tel:360.379.4450 Fax:360.379.4451 Web:wtcw.co.iefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment ' i L- �S OO. E-ma l:dcd@co.iefferson.wa.us ! OCT 2 9 2014 s PERMIT FEES WORKSHEET JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Name Dream City Parcel # Estimated Cost of Project Permit# Building Base Fees Building Base Plan Check Review Land Use Review Septic Review Potable Water Technology/Scan State Fee Other Fees Shoreline Exemption Zoning Stormwater $380.00 Zoning SEPA $919.00 New Address Public Works Stormwater $652.00 Total Fees $1,951.00 Office Use Only Receipt Number: L Cash/Check/CC: ' Date: 1 0I)GV i Initials: Joel Peterson From: Eric Kuzma Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 5:14 PM To: Joel Peterson Subject: ZON14-00045/MLA14-00090 Stormwater Phase 1 Comments Attachments: SW Comments-PH 1.pdf Hi Joel, I have completed my Stormwater review, Phase 1-Clearing& Grading, for ZON14-00045/MLA14-00090, Dream City LLC and have no further comments. Please contact me with any questions. Thank you, Eric Eric Kuzma,Architect/Engineer III Jefferson County Department of Public Works 623 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 Ph:360.385.9167 - 360.301.6783(c) Fax: 360.385.9234 Email: ekuzma;cojefferson.wa.us Web.- www.co.ieferson.wa.us/publicworks 1 Existing Drained Impervious Surface Areas Area Square Ft Comments Existing Building 2,592 Currently dispersed along buiding perimeters Existing Garage,to be removed: 576 Existing Driveway 4,400 Existing Total Impervious Area: 7,568 Parcel Area: 78,676 Existing Impervious Coverage: 10% Proposed Phase 1 Drained Impervious Surface Areas Area Square Ft Comments Existing Building 2,592 Dispersed along building perimeter Revised Pervious Driveway& Parking Lot 7,200 Gravel, semi-pervious pavers or porous concrete Proposed Building A 7,000 Downspout flow dispersed and infiltrated Proposed Total Impervious Area: 16,792 Parcel Area: 78,676 Proposed Phase 1 Impervious Coverage: 21% Prescribed Infiltration Surface: 800 SF 60 SF of infiltration trench or bed area per 1,000 SF of drained surface Proposed Phase 2 Drained Impervious Surface Areas Area Square Ft Comments Existing Building 2,592 Revised Pervious Driveway&Parking Lot 7,200 Proposed Buildings A& B 14,000 Three Proposed Greenhouses 22,638 Proposed Total Impervious Area: 46,430 Parcel Area: 84,946 Assumes additional 6,270 SF from Vacated Proposed Phase 2 Impervious Coverage: 54.7% Louisa Street Prescribed Infiltration Surface: 2,500 SF D.O.E. Stormwater Manual for medium sands `Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington,2012; Design Criteria for Infiltration Trenches, pages 441-443;60 SF of infiltration trench or 90 cubic ft of drywell per 1,000 SF of drained surface,for medium sands. Joel Peterson From: Eric Kuzma Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 2:49 PM To: Joel Peterson Subject: FW: Dream City Stormwater Attachments: Impervious Surface Inventory Revised Jan 19, 2015.xlsx Categories: CASE ACTION FYI, see attached update. Eric Kuzma,Architect/Engineer III Jefferson County Department of Public Works 623 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 Ph:360.385.9167 - 360.301.6783(c) Fax:360.385.9234 Email: ekuzma@co.je(ferson.wa.us Web: www.co.jefferson.wa.us/publicworks From:ev_sorensen@hotmail.com [mailto:ev_sorensen@hotmail.com] On Behalf Of Everett A. Sorensen Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 7:43 AM To: Eric Kuzma Subject: Dream City Stormwater Hello Eric, The City of Port Townsend allows counting semi-pervious surfaces ("pervious concrete", driveway pavers) and green roofs at 50% of their actual area. Not sure if the Manual has any similar provision, other than using a different Run-off Curve Number when computing run-off. Assuming that reduction will not apply here, I revised my Impervious Surface Inventory, attached. I re- calculated the driveway area at 7,200 SF. Counting it at 100% brings the total impervious area to 46,300 which is 54.7%of the parcel area. --Everett Everett A. Sorensen, P.E. Streamline Environmental, Inc. 1821 Sahlman Drive, Suite B;Tampa, FL 33605 715 Grant Street; Port Townsend, WA 98368-2405 360-821-9960 From: ekuzma@co.jefferson.wa.us To: everett@streamlineenv.com 1 2.0iLi -L15 4. JEFFERSON COUNTY ikiiii DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (FIN 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend • Washington 98368 4'qs O$ 360/379-4450 . 360/379-4451 Fax BINC http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ STORMWATER� / / SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL TEMPLATE MLA# IL} - V""` I L' PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: Dream Ctiy LLC Please answer all of the following questions to the best of your ability. Where the question calls for depiction on a site map, the applicant may choose to either incorporate the elements into the general plot plan for the Master Land Use Application or to submit a separate stormwater site plan map. Project Overview 1. Describe the proposed developed conditions of the site. Indicate position and relative size of proposed improvements on the site map. 1 Applicants propose to improve the W. Fredericks Street light industrial site in two phases. Phase 1 includes remodeling the existing 1 2,592 SF building,dismantling the existing 576 SF car port,and adding a 7,000 SF insulated metal building. Phase 2 includes an additional 7,000 SF building and three greenhouses totaling 22,638 SF, and adding a 1,560 SF fire access lane. Existing Conditions Summary 2. Describe the existing topography. Indicate contours on the site map. The existing topography is mostly level or gently sloped generally to the north at grades of 2 to 6%. 3. Describe the existing vegetation. Indicate native vegetation areas on the site map. The site is well vegetated with lawn, shrubs,gardens and second-growth forest. 4. Describe the existing soils. Indicate soil type on the site map. Native soils on the site consist typically of well-drained medium sandy loams. The USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRSC)lists two predominant soil types for the site vicinity: 1. HuC,which indicates Hoypus gravelly loamy sand,and 2. CfD,which indicates Cassolary sandy loam. Hue soils are typically highly permeable and well-drained. CfD soils are considered only moderately permeable 5. Describe the existing site hydrology (i.e., drainage; behavior of water on the site—above, below, and on the ground). Indicate existing stormwater drainage to and from the site on the site map. Depict separate drainage basins on the site map, if applicable, and indicate acreage of each. There are no indications of surface flows on the site. The well-drained site soils readily infiltrate stormwater under most conditions. A drainage gully at the north central portion also shows little indication of surface flows, suggesting only infrequent peak storm run- off from the site in that direction. A 2002 septic system design reports well drained soils with groundwater deeper than the 5 to 7 ft exploration depth in 11 soil evaluation holes. 6. Describe any excess levels of noise generated by the proposed use or activity: - l I,— ow —, None. _. $�_.� 1 nu 'z 9 2014 I f JEF(Li;<' s COUNTY fFFT.Or COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT stormwater site plan template.doc—rev.4/28/2014 """'" 5 7. Describe significant geographic features and critical areas (i.e., environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands, streams, steep slopes,etc.)on the site. Indicate location on the site map. There are no significant geographic features, critical or environmentally sensitive areas on the site. 8. Describe the general vicinity of the site, including adjacent land uses and structures, utilities, roads, and sensitive/critical areas (streams,wetlands, lakes,steep slopes,etc.). The site vicinity includes several light industrial facilities interspersed within an overall lightly developed area. The site is served with electricity and city water. West Fredericks Street is maintained by the County only to Louisa Street, a north-south street bordering the subject site's eastern boundary. Permanent Stormwater Control Plan This portion of the Stormwater Site Plan consists of the selection and installation of the appropriate stormwater control BMPs and facilities to remain in place after construction of the project is completed. "Medium" size projects are required to have the totals calculated of all impervious surfaces, pollution-generating impervious surfaces, and pollution-generating pervious surfaces to verify that the thresholds for treatment facilities and flow control facilities are not exceeded. 9. Describe the developed site hydrology, as proposed. Indicate whether stormwater will be fully dispersed (i.e., per BMP T5.30 in the Manual) or, if not, what types of stormwater flow control will be utilized for the site or specific threshold discharge areas within the site. Locate these facilities on the site plan and differentiate proposed facilities from existing facilities. Applicants propose 100%on-site infiltration of stormwater. This will be achieved through a combination of downspout dispersion where allowed, and constructed infiltration features including infiltration trenches&beds, and rain gardens. Some of these facilities will be provided with emergency overflows directed to the central-north natural drainage gully. 10. If the project requires the use of stormwater treatment facilities, describe the types of stormwater treatment facilities proposed for use on the site. Locate these facilities on the site plan and differentiate proposed facilities from existing facilities. [This is normally for"large" projects or projects that involve the potential for dispersion of contaminants.] No treatment facilities are proposed. 11. Describe the performance goals and standards applicable to the project. 100%on-site infiltration, 100% pollution prevention, 100%erosion control during construction. 12. Describe the flow control system. Infiltration beds will be sized to accommodate most storm events, but will be equipped with emergency_ava4lows-thffat777'1 will not discharge up-gradient of the existing septic drainfield. •�� 1 ; i `V ii stormwater site plan template.doc—rev.4/28/2014 13. Describe the water quality system. None proposed. 14. Describe the conveyance system analysis and design. Roof downspouts on the metal buildings will generally discharge to splash blocks that disperse to rain gardens. Some of these downspouts will discharge to rain gardens via 4" PVC tight-lines. Greenhouse downspouts will be tight-lined via 4" PVC pipes to one of several infiltration beds. These infiltration beds will be equipped with emergency overflows to upgradient of the north central gulley,to a proposed rip-rap-protected overflow. 15. Describe the source of fill material, physical characteristics of fill material, and deposition of excess material. Cut material from certain locations of the site will be used as fill in other locations. Coarse,washed drain rock will be used in the proposed infiltration beds. 16. Proposed methods of placement and compaction consistent with the applicable standards on Appendix Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. Material must be substantially free of organic material and rock or similar irreducible material with a maximum dimention of 12 inches. Surfaces to be filled shall be prepared by removing vegetation, noncomplying fill,topsoil and other unsuitable materials. Surface shall be scarified to provide a bond with new fill. Fill shall be applied in lifts, each compacted to a minimum of 90%of maximum density. 17. Describe the proposed surfacing material. The proposed driveway and parking area will be gravel. Undeveloped surfaces will remain vegetated or be re-vegetated with native plants. 18. Describe methods for restoration of the site. Disturbed areas will be re-vegetated with native plants. 19. An Operation and Maintenance Manual is required for each flow control and treatment facility. [This is normally required for "large"projects only and only those for which facilities are required to control flow or treat runoff.] If included, list the Manuals here. No flow control nor treatment facilities are proposed. 20. List here and include any special reports or studies conducted to prepare the Stormwater Site Plan. 1. 2002 Soil Evaluation conducted by Mike Deeney in conjunction with designing the existing on-site sewage system. 2. September 14, 2014, site and soil evaluation conducted by Everett Sorensen, P.E. 21. List other necessary permits and approvals as required by other regulatory agencies. If those permits or approvals include conditions that affect the drainage plan or contain more restrictive drainage-related requirements, describe those conditions or restrictions here. 1. The Washington State Department of Natural Resources will evaluate timber on the site in order to obatin a determination of non-significance that will allow timber removal. 2. The Washington State Liquor Control Board wiIttv-alja�eftha dep\eta d-facilhty prior to issuing the applicant a license to grow cannabis. ' t= stormwater site plan template.doc—rev.4/28/2014 CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) The Construction SWPPP addresses sediment and erosion control during construction. The BMPs indicated by the applicant in the template that follows must be installed on the ground during all construction phases of the project. The proponent is responsible for preventing sediment and erosion impacts to environmentally sensitive areas and off-site areas. Consult the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet for guidance, particularly with rural residential development. SECTION I—CONSTRUCTION SWPPP NARRATIVE 1. Construction Stormwater Pollution Plan Elements. Describe how each of the Construction SWPPP elements has been or will be addressed. Identify the type and location of BMPs used to satisfy the required element. If an element is not applicable to the proposal,justify in writing. Descriptions of the 12 Elements are found at Volume II Section 3.2.3 of the Manual (beginning on page 3-7). 12 Required Elements-Construction SWPPP 1. Mark Clearing Limits. Clearing limits are depicted on the Construction Stormwater Site Plan. 2. Establish Construction Access. Construction access will be limited to the exisitng gravel driveway, depicted on the Construction Stormwater Site Plan. 3. Control Flow Rates. No dewatering nor flow diversion will be needed for site development. 4. Install Sediment Controls. A standard filter fabric fence will be installed along the down-gradient perimeter of development activities, as indicated on the Construction Stormwater Site Plan. 5. Stabilize Soils. All disturbed surfaces will be covered with straw mulch at least 2"thick to minimize erosion of these exposed surfaces. Any soil or sediment left in piles for at least two days during the wet season (7 days during the dry season)will be covered with plastic,secured around the edges, to prevent erosion. 6. Protect Slopes. The north-central drainage gully will be protected with filter fence as described above (Item 4). 7. Protect Drain Inlets. There are no storm drains at the site requiring protection. I i; stormwater site plan template-doc—rev-4/2812014 12 Required Elements—Construction SWPPP(continued) 8. Stabilize Channels and Outlets. There are no channels or outlets at the site. 9. Control Pollutants. Pollution will be prevented. All site workers will be instructed to prevent the discharge of contaminants, including solid waste, hydrocarbons, solvents, etc. 10. Control De-Watering(the act of pumping groundwater or stormwater away from an active construction site). No dewatering is expected to be needed. 11. Maintain Best Management Practices(BMPs). Conditions will be assessed regularly. Construction stormwater management features will be adjusted, repaired and replaced as needed to maintain full function. Upon completion of each phase, temporary erosion and sedimentation controls will be removed taking care to not release accumulated sediments. 12. Manage the Project. Construction activities will be completed in an orderly fashion and coordinated to minimize surface disturbance. Exposed surface areas will be minimized during all construction phases. Work will not be conducted during periods of intense rainfall. Temporary erosion and sedimentation controls will be inspected regularliy and adjusted, repaired and replaced as needed to maintain full function. 2. Adjacent Areas. a. Description of the adjacent areas that may be affected by site disturbance (e.g., streams, lakes, wetlands, residential areas, roads). There are no nearby streams, wetlands or lakes. Adjacent residential areas to the west and north of the site will not be afected by construction activities, other than normal construction noise limited to daylight hours. West Fredericks Street will be used by construction vehicles. In order to protect W. Fredericks Street, mud and other debris will be removed from trucks prior to departing the site during construction activies (however, site soils are not prone to creating sticky mud). b. Description of the downstream drainage path leading from the site to the receiving body of water(minimum distance of 400 yards). There are no streams or rivers within 4,000 ft of the subiect site, likely due to the high permeability of soils in this locale. Furthermore,there are no indication of significant stormwater surface flows within the immediate site vicinity. 3. Environmentally Sensitive Areas. a. Description of environmentally sensitive areas that are on or adjacent to the site. There are no environmentally sensitive areas on or adjacent to the site. stormwater site plan template.doc—rev.4/28/2014 g b. Description of special requirements for working in or near environmentally sensitive areas. j;. None. it 4. Erosion Problem Areas. Description of potential erosion problems on site in the context of the characteristics of the on-sem soils (e.g., erodibility, settleability, permeability, depth, texture,soil structure). No erosion problem areas identified on or near the site. 5. Construction Phasing. a. Construction sequence 1. Site preparation(marking of clearing limits, filter fence installation, establishment of construction entrance and truck de-mudding area, staging of straw bales) 2. Tree&brush removal 3. Cutting,filling & grading to prepare Building A site. 4. Remodel existing building, demolis existing garage, erect Building A. b. Construction phasing (if proposed) Phase 1: Site prep; clearing of vegetation; cut,fill &grade; remodeling existing&erection of Building A. Phase 2: Vacation of west half of Louisa Street adjacent to site; building site prep, construction of fire entrance, erection of Building B and three greenhouses. 6. Construction Schedule. Wet season is October 1 through April 30(page 2-21 of the Manual). Provide a proposed construction schedule. Phase 1 could begin in late 2014, pending Conty permitting. Activites would occur as weather permits,starting with site preparation for construction (TE&SC). Phase 2 to follow SEPA Determination of Non-significance and County issuance of permits (as early as early 2015) II. Wet Season Construction Activities. a. Proposed wet season construction activities. Site prep, clearing&grading as weather permits,erection of Building B b. Proposed wet season construction activities for environmentally sensitive areas. No environmentally sensitive areas. 7. Financial/Ownership Responsibilities. a. Identify the property owner responsible for the initiation of bonds and/or other financial securities. Marc Hilt(Dream City LLC principal) b. Describe bonds and/or other evidence of financial responsibility for liability associated with erosion and sedimentation impacts. Applicant is self-bonded. 8. Engineering Calculations. Provide Design Calculations on a separate sheet for the following, if applicable. a. Sediment Ponds/Traps. Not applicable b. Diversions. NA c. Waterways. NA d. Runoff/Stormwater Detention Calculations Design storm event: The 6-month storm for Port Townsend is 0.77 inches of rainfall. For the proposed additional roof area of 36,638 SF(Phase 1 &2),the design storm even would produce about 2,300 cubic ft of water(17,000 gallons). stormwater site plan template.doc—rev.4/28/2014 10 Stormwater Site Plan Changes If the designer wishes to make changes or revisions to the originally approved Stormwater Site Plan, the proposed revisions shall be submitted to DCD prior to construction. The submittal shall include substitute pages that include all proposed changes, revised drawings showing any structural changes, and any other supporting information that explains and supports the reason for the change. Final Corrected Plan Submittal If the project included construction of conveyance systems, treatment facilities, flow control facilities, or structural source control BMPs (not standard on-site stormwater management BMPs), the applicant shall submit a final corrected plan ("as-builts")when the project is completed. These should be engineering drawings (stamped by a licensed civil engineer) that accurately represent the project as constructed. APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Construction SWPPP worksheet, I as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owner- of the affected p`perry. owner/ /a -z7- l¢ ( NDOWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) THIS SPACE MAY BE USED FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES, IF NEEDED: 4:?ecetp+- 1 51I ® 3kr00 6is SEPH- 9 19 -Q ( -e I0/dam'/1 '-) S4 ''n'` ,- (02 �o ! -}11DIHI1VC OCT L 9 2014 I', JEO ER3bN CUUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVEI CEMENT stormwater site plan template.doc—rev.4/282014 12 C s � m r ,<a m 00 � m o L QoQo ° r_1:1 m m m p O � Oo, o 0 07 nN - - 00 ` Q � m _ CD -1 � m0- W` o W ' ° ° ° ° ^AZ s a3 ^ Q ' � ° -. D T ° > � o � � D QDJ . C—° o ° C) QwCo Ts. 03rn � ND, DC7 mwD Q _ D -0m rn cD 0 7 C C iy. (Q V -0 -, /D� O a n Cr 1 0 � Q - O � � Q oo d � � � w RcwD - IDoco OLn tiN m AcE Cn A CCrr Q Cr" —h Ch co 0D —0 NO ° n Co co T O 6 D N N 1 0 fl v D SR 20 to Port Townsend £ ..off �� O T :9 a sh� /� -0vrntn -O -0Nz CO O < (Da 0O 0 O . U' (D O % `SOQN °� i—+ < • CD � o' � m° m ,—. NO ' 3 n .. I. iI! I� Q 00 yr 1, 4' __ n I t- ,. �— , fl i C//) MMIIIIMMWM v ^ z- cnel z N mNm I o H o -0VOQOO( � ° Cr) Eo m CD C) g DcD'R - C�� co r4 Q -0 TD- 8XCD (D6z o Q < Co o v (D a rte,D di CD = y ° • < CD c CQ y D 0 z (p N _ z v, (D M (D• y p to r V• CD > N aC < Q ° `n 4t cn 7C U -0 W C 00 V)\ `,, C� (D (D 0 n' • Nn S —F VJ DO N , n D gym ° Z No O . rn H I _ rrl Z y + CD in t-. . 7 O - z + — 9. CD rn O = -O i� D A cn 2 T ,,,,_0' ••:,1"' O Clm < . z _< 5 m Dc 5 ° ( nm z o X n 3 (D Q 0 3 (DO6 , 1 1 CI) oN= n _ Q Q III Z � � Go (75) -(6 -t rn � O O W W z rn 72 g r N. C y � Da ° = � X N � oO_ _ _ CDap ( QQU m o n ,- r V !2m - D m ( 3 ( °' ] X En , D °o O N m z O 0 coir D 0 n 3 -9 (D (� m < C) m © ° QW �• II m k) i °' 3 CD m E• CD < `- (iO c N �• 0, 2 m • w v CCi °9 Q TD oc � D op, CD N A Q II = (D in D - "' p Q rn I I W II H ° 0 off. ° _ 0 V c O -. •• o 4" — o. v O. o v C O CQ o-. 0) o a (A N Q " CD m a) m o Y -- o D 9.., _ Q rn _ o Q M 7 o _i• 7C Cn o v) rn m y m m Ri ; c DREAM CITY, LLC : SITE IMPROVEMENTS ii5;', ', U) z 1 a -1 A SQaam a';m33� f1 ED 1 Z1 §-i igoo.1 cn 'a O m M 192 W. FREDERICKS STREET 3 3 g PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 f J .i / -7 p�� � (L L m Ml1114- ( L1.JIVi� �L1L�LJ�1� m Joel Peterson From: Joel Peterson Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 4:57 PM To: Carl Smith Subject: Update on Dream City Carl: This is per your request on Wednesday (sorry for the delay): Update on Dream City, LLC location at Fredericks Street Project: Two phased project beginning with Stormwater Permit, site preparation and building permits for first grow structures (pole barn Second Phase includes multiple greenhouses Pending Permits: Septic permit Engineered Stormwater review by Public Works Building—pre engineered steel building, heated Building—pre engineered steel building, 7000 s.f. unheated Building-8-foot fence permit Things for followup: Existing structure is permitted as Garage with a toilet(septic). Determine what changes are planned,septic capacity, Change Of Use permit. Public Works is following-up some stormwater calculation questions. Public Comment: 19 letters of comments from State,County and local residents Some Issues raised concern increased traffic &children's access to bus/school, light and glare concerns, concerns with marijuana growing&children, impacts from crop nutrients. Next Steps for Type 1 permit process with pending SEPA Determination: Public comment period closed January 7. Comments will be compiled and reviewed A threshold determination made for SEPA Identify mitigation needs if MDNS (mitigated does-not-significantly adversely affect...) Issue copies of Notice of Decision to parties of record. Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 1 tiwON co DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368 Tel 360.3-9.44.50 1 Ft ix: 360.3-9 4431 \k'eb:www.co.leffersonAca.us%community development E snail:dcd 2-co.iefferson.ctia.us %tI NGC) PERMIT APPLICATION Steps in the Permit Process: -Review application checklist to ensure all information is completed prior to submitting application. -Make sure septic has been applied for and water availability has been proven. -Make an appointment to meet with the Permit Technician by calling 360-379-4450. -This is not a standalone application;it must be accompanied by a project specific supplemental application. -Fees will be collected at intake. Additional fees may apply after review and payment is required before permit is issued. For Department Use Only Building Permit# Related Application#s: MLA# Site Information Assessor Tax Parcel Number: 948601301 Site Address and/or Directions to Property: 192 W. Fredericks Street; F ('ef { f g{ f t Access(name of street(s)) from which access will be gained: Was! " � tet Present use of property: 2,592 SF work shop used for c.e. Description of Work (include proposed uses): C' _ e ;— Applicants propose to develop the site with new buildins "Nevest package, weigh and label cannabis under license with the , .t Wastewater-Sewage Disposal44-71I7 -2 This property is served by Port Townsend of Port Ludlow sewer systf p.,j 9 If not served by sewer identified above, identify type of septic syster �^ Type of Sewage System Serving Property: ✓ Septic Septic Permit#: SEP02-111 Community Septic Name of System: Case#: Are other residences connected to the septic system? No Additions or repairs to sewage system: None Is it a complete or partial system installation: Complete I/ Partial Has a reserve drainfield been designated? Yes _ _ No Date of Last Operations& Maintenance check: September 19, 2014 Attach last report to application Describe or attach any drainfield easements, covenants or notices on title, which may impact the property: None Parcel Details Page 1 of 2 ounty Home County Info Departments Search Parcel Number: 948601301 SEARCH Parcel Number: 948601301 Printer Friendly Owner Mailing Address: DREAM CITY LLC PO BOX 1909 N,L1\. IL\ •- cio PORT TOWNSEND WA98368-0062 Site Address: 192 W FREDERICKS ST PORT TOWNSEND 98368 Section: 16 School Distict: Port Townsend (50) Qtr Section: SW1/4 Fre Dist: Chimacum (1) Township: 30N Tax Status: Taxable Range: 1W Tax Code: 0111 Planning area: Quimper (2) Sub Division: 9486 - EISENBEIS BAY VIEW Assessor's Land Use Code: 9800 - Garages, Outbuildings, Other Imps Property Description: EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13, LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN VAC ALLEY, SOPHIA ST, & S/VAC ELWOOD ST ADJ Tax,AN, Sales, Photos, and Permit Data Bldg Data Map Parcel lats&Surveys Septic Monitoring Info P* i ,. Jefgrson County HOME I COUNTY INFO I DEPARTMENTS I SEARCH Best viewed with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 or later Windows- Mac http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parceldetail.asp?Parcel NO=948601301 10/30/2014 Cases Associated with a Parcel Page 1 of 2 Pr - Jefferson County Hume County Info Departments Search Cases Associated with Parcel No: 948601301 This may not be a complete listing of information that exists for this parcel. There may be other information pertinent to the property on file. Please contact the Department of Community Development for additional information. *Parcel Tags Case Number PRE14-00021 Description Proposed I-502 Agriculture Structures. Two structures will handle interior growing operations, and will be pre-engineered metal buildings of a TYPE IIB construction. The third structure will consist of seven gutter-connected greenhouses, categorized as temporary building structures. The Existing septic system is planned to support the minimal employees. the Site has an existing PUD Water and Power Service. Last Name DREAM CITY LLC Received Date 9/19/2014 10:57:58 AM No Images Case Number SOM02-00111 Description Last Name GRACE Received Date 1/30/2008 No Images Case Number BLD03-00028 Description ADD BATHROOM TO EXISTING WORKSHOP Last Name CHRISTOPHER GRACE Received Date 1/14/2003 No Images Case Number BLD02-00574 Description GARAGE / STORAGE BUILDING Last Name GRACE Received Date 9/27/2002 No Images Case Number BLD02-00573 Description CARPORT http://www.co.j efferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ppquery/cm.asp?value=948601301 10/30/2014 Cases Associated with a Parcel Page 2 of 2 Last Name GRACE Received Date 9/27/2002 No Images Case Number SEP02-00111 Description Last Name GRACE Received Date 5/29/2002 Images Case Number RAP02-00038 Description ROAD APPROACH & 911 - W FREDERICKS ST Last Name GRACE Received Date 3/4/2002 No Images Jefferson County HOME I COUNTY INFO i DEPARTMENTS I SEARCH Best viewed with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 or later 0 Windows - Mac http://www.co.j efferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ppquery/cm.asp?value=948601301 10/30/2014 PROPERTY LINE ppb .fir , iii.:::::,,I.:::, ; Y�a d . NDSAJ E GREENING tr6 : ih`+ stw . ea sea4 + 5- ry1ei6> nn4aend - 3 J rn -l b51DE YARD SETBACKr A_ b 1 z 1 r:: ', ��\ �� g/ST/NG 64'-3" N 53 I it _WI WI ..•:!::..i.,:l'i,..:' ill .-) .f � a e1 > 6 w :::'-'.."..1:-:i n ,..„,„ w III O Z --i :7 CAii c o, „� i i CnL --;:i::`;%.:':::i —i< d �, 1 O w N p cv � , // —� - 1 O a �s'-0 F, . -0" U > '15'-0, °'-0' —moi A 'aA p r� A 1-"Cep -0„ GREENHOUSE N u °. o I. .I o (3) 24'x 132' = 9 5O4 .-a aJ z b rn ,w H BUILDING "D" 6 , rn ,., 4 z ::rn9J d 1 d co .3, rn rni.: :4 rn • rn .;. ::::::::::::;:::::1 I Oii O ,a,u (3) 24'x132' = 9,504 SOFT . :a �_-V_ _ BUILDING "E" '• <,d Oz f ., r� a1 `" .) GREENHOUSE i : 21'_6"x132' = 3,630 SOFT ' °'°-''`, BUILDING "F" Ma e;1 �o :i—_ u u wra �O 1 O el d b FIRE LANE I SIDE YARD 5ETBAGK kt`:�.ea.` ® PROPERTY LINE T Z xi -nrnpCO W W 7 oc@ o ii II g. • Mo ° � moD ° AQ ° omn � n: • 0oO � u;coOOO 0 Q tr.� ac -. 85 .', 8 0 O Ca •o 0 O Q O Q Q . 0,x (.1mMn z O �A0aQZ � X „ nP, U, UI ( 7 On N7 � no7 OQD CD < rn m ° N L---A--Lo' < ° 7Oa_ (!) (Q () D N OJ __ .. ;fl—^ .„.• co O o c am , cn D Op 7C- 0) 0 (:)(0 nQ _,C jCQflnoo DpnCD O ZII O + C �-v O ' ^ Onm m � 0x a O inv, D . � , -tHmaV = Oo mm • m .0c . za0 oa1.2 ,, �-• - o' O VI C0 � VD aCD g • 3 • „D N cF< -` .-ssNOV67 V A ay s>, ,co ape-, ? .,MQcao " Z Z ' n - D - p _ NO0 � o= -< A a � a � rnpj1 • p� n70 .-E, n O1 O 3 O Oo 0° D VDo 0 :�W� ° Q o. K 'Ncc 0 C I 0. CJIN V Ci. rc -O - N 0 a0aCD w v, H p •--- �aN . �n m (D Z7 .. Q .g - = r-2.d� ? Z 'ONC O U . � . CW co XO n_P ` � NC � 7 = y- N a • • � � 7 � 4 C, nCDc DO L r,-,-• Vi Dr T� n • O 3 ( ''' n -. C o 5 1,' omsa ° Gri IS sp P. .172 co 8. 5 90 fW c a s C O a on c Omo m to - N io o D DREAM CITY, LLC '.` t. IKi do (O 3Qi �3ii $ O. A 1 192 W. FREDERICKS STREET 13 iN; PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 r Case Review Time Tracking: DCD Review from 12/11/2014 to 3/26/2015 for ZON14-00045. (Hourly Rate = $78.00) ZON14-00045 HILT 01/14/2015 100 Review 2014-12-18: 2hrs leader publication, APO mailing--jmp Joel Peterson 01/14/2015 20 Review 2014-12-18: 2hrs leader publication, APO mailing--jmp Joel Peterson 01/14/2015 100 Review 2015-01-13: 4.5 hrs case review, public comment review jmp Joel Peterson 01/14/2015 100 Review 2015-01-13: 4.5 hrs case review, public comment review--jmp Joel Peterson 01/14/2015 70 Review 2015-01-13: 4.5 hrs case review, public comment review--jmp Joel Peterson 02/11/2015 100 Review 2015-02-11: threshold determination evaluation--jmp Joel Peterson 02/11/2015 20 Review 2015-02-11: threshold determination evaluation--jmp Joel Peterson 02/13/2015 90 Review 2015-02-13: mailing distribution of Final DNS--jmp Joel Peterson 02/18/2015 100 Review 2015-02-18: permit review&conditions, 3.5 hours--jmp Joel Peterson 02/18/2015 100 Review 2015-02-18: permit review&conditions, 3.5 hours--jmp Joel Peterson 02/18/2015 10 Review 2015-02-18: permit review&conditions, 3.5 hours--jmp Joel Peterson 810 minutes (13.50 hours) $1,053.00 Total 810 minutes (13.50 hours) $1053.00 1 3/26/2015 \\tidemark\data\forms\r DCD Case Review Time Tracking: DCD Review from 12/11/2014 to 3/26/2015 for BLD14-00460. (Hourly Rate = $78.00) BLD14-00460 DREAM CITY LLC 03/23/2015 90 Review 2015-03-23: site plan revisions& underground storage tank Joel Peterson email--jmp 03/26/2015 20 Review 2015-03-24: planning team review of UST&SEPA Joel Peterson 03/26/2015 20 Review 2015-03-25: TC w/Simon L. re: propane, SEPA&existing chainlink Joel Peterson fencing--jmp 03/26/2015 100 Review 2015-03-26: (2hrs) conditions & permit prep w/ revised site Joel Peterson plan-jmp 03/26/2015 20 Review 2015-03-26: (2hrs) conditions & permit prep w/revised site Joel Peterson plan-jmp 250 minutes (4.17 hours) $325.00 Total 250 minutes (4.17 hours) $325.00 1 3/26/2015 \\tidemark\data\forms\r DCD INVOICE Date: 3/27/2015 Invoice ID: DCD15BLD14-00460 r ¢SON co JEFFERSON COUNTY w4 4.' G?� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT `' .< 621 Sheridan Street I Port Townsend, WA 98368 4,040 - 360-379-4450 I email. dcd@co.jefferson.wa.us ��gSN,-N �o� www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment Date Due: BILLING ADDRESS: 4/26/2015 DREAM CITY LLC PO BOX 1909 PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368-0062 Consistency Review 91.26 Total Amount Due: $91.26 REMIT TO: Jefferson County DCD 621 Sheridan St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 Please return the above portion with your payment Permit NumbelaBLD14-00460 Consistency Review 91.26 c0-&-D1L1- `/!91 Jei_D fli-- Lfb2 Total Amount Due: $91.26 Payment is accepted by cash, check, debit or credit card (Visa, Mastercard, Discover, American Express) To pay by credit card, go to www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment, and click on the "Online Credit Card & echeck Payments" link on the left side of the page. (questions: call 360-379-4450) Case Review Time Tracking: DCD Review from 12/11/2014 to 3/26/2015 for BLD14-00460. (Hourly Rate = $78.00) BLD14-00460 DREAM CITY LLC 03/23/2015 90 Review 2015-03-23: site plan revisions& underground storage tank Joel Peterson email--jmp 03/26/2015 20 Review 2015-03-24: planning team review of UST& SEPA Joel Peterson 03/26/2015 20 Review 2015-03-25: TC w/Simon L. re: propane, SEPA&existing chainlink Joel Peterson fencing--jmp 03/26/2015 100 Review 2015-03-26: (2hrs)conditions & permit prep w/revised site Joel Peterson plan-jmp 03/26/2015 20 Review 2015-03-26: (2hrs) conditions & permit prep w/ revised site Joel Peterson plan-jmp 250 minutes (4.17 hours) $325.00 Total 250 minutes (4.17 hours) $325.00 /80 rninM��(3 ham- kc d d tI 1c�dl ( 7 (-1 2.11��r E78 r ` jL,t 1 I - Y6. 0 0 1 3/26/2015 1\tide mark\data\form s\r_DC D, Case Review Time Tracking: DCD Review from 12/11/2014 to 3/26/2015 for ZON14-00045. (Hourly Rate = $78.00) ZON14-00045 HILT 01/14/2015 100 Review 2014-12-18: 2hrs leader publication, APO mailing--jmp Joel Peterson 01/14/2015 20 Review 2014-12-18: 2hrs leader publication, APO mailing-jmp Joel Peterson 01/14/2015 100 Review 2015-01-13: 4.5 hrs case review, public comment review--jmp Joel Peterson 01/14/2015 100 Review 2015-01-13: 4.5 hrs case review, public comment review--jmp Joel Peterson 01/14/2015 70 Review 2015-01-13: 4.5 hrs case review, public comment review--jmp Joel Peterson 02/11/2015 100 Review 2015-02-11: threshold determination evaluation--jmp Joel Peterson 02/11/2015 20 Review 2015-02-11: threshold determination evaluation--jmp Joel Peterson 02/13/2015 90 Review 2015-02-13: mailing distribution of Final DNS--jmp Joel Peterson 02/18/2015 100 Review 2015-02-18: permit review&conditions, 3.5 hours--jmp Joel Peterson 02/18/2015 100 Review 2015-02-18: permit review&conditions, 3.5 hours--jmp Joel Peterson 02/18/2015 10 Review 2015-02-18: permit review&conditions, 3.5 hours--jmp Joel Peterson 810 minutes (13.50 hours) $1,053.00 Total 810 minutes (13.50 hours) $1053.00 1 3/26/2015 1ltidemark\data\forms1rDCD =Os = s x x `r x f �e S 's * = x x x = = gg W 3 5 5 3 T m m $ $ n n n m g D D D 1\1 fl R, y f p fi m m m IVT iag 2 ''^ m �. o � �� c � Q � o � w m 3 y 4 f G~ n n o i i i S a 6 ii m ;e m * s QS 3 ` < c V 3 0 $ o n a 'b y{ o w o e o a o o 9 pi �3 m i. ;v14 v i9i £ 4 '2 a i t '"'"""" g= ` o .62m1,2 . *m g h1 o o.c 2 2 c e - gao as - Z ` '.4 '4 %:- -- aa df S :� m c 3 c DDD D D g D g g n n g o c c g g g g g g D D D D D D D D D D t •E Eo o qqqq . o ioDo g55�� Qo 00 2S S 'a -- � i n� uuS3 � � 'b' �' � o m w {�io vw .i3 (Ti � o � Q$ 3 o\ '6 6 " § " ! ! - I I S ? ? � ? -1 � A N N N i. N N N ► A t ± ► ± ± � i N N tiA 111 - . j N N N N N ' N N " 1 a 151 1 1 IIMini 111 5,. ,-4 ,1 N N W y N N a N N NN w N N N + ' N N N SS SO 88888 O D SS S 888 S 888 Ar, mm mmmAm m rnm A AAA A AAA NN - wt Ni3N0 S ' mAai mi ; ; ; RN m = = s ; UM Uat zz g 1y 2 igi .. o a a S a 7F `� a� N $QQ j, o �Ay m 3 , n ` S- Z V F . R 1 N g 8Q ; n a s I o 2g F y n ; �i , S i iR t ; m 1 6 v n oIf a' m RC) W N J o 98 an 1g n �' 1 i g m . o o' 1. y n a 8 n'g ? 8 - 1 D =. 9- 1- °' A ' S i £ a . p' o o ? a g $ f , $ e xa y� $ Es x I � w n = O S I m ii I N I W 1A5A S N� rn� P � � y .4G � �. N +t�, 3 a A n ti 1 II ' a a (M0% * + . . . . . N f1 N A N N A 4. 1• A U1 . . . . . . . 001 x2 y x ,y x = = = 22 = 22 SS g g2 = = = = = = l is p i g D c a a a i 9 a va v o g i < O 6 8 S 721 1 m c ¢D S 3 r m g `r'Si L c w w - , . i . . . : wm Y UiU= 1UfliU1UUiI 2.o 3ww zair "<� -G 5E2 , ,-, 04? > � w m d a c . D E p n o3v EE - 2 - = a 8 � o2 r7 WI4 ` AR. wawawTmapg5- E o � � qc Tz m . oe e. $ 4 z oE ee , 5 c en m D8D 8 D D D D D D 8 8 $ $ ixx x x o g g E g DD D D D D ➢ D DD ayymS ,1 / "4Zww $ 8R10g6bg om -41 §. 2wSgSpo 0' O i 9.0 m m u '� N N N N t N N P t it 7: a . . aa N I--, A g al 7: 0 N t N N N HUUHH iiii i 11 1NM , N N N 4% aN N N N N N N N N II 88888 88888 88 8 8 888 8 88 . - A A A f'i. Ari m g A g g AA g g 'A g A m gArm T T sN NNs A ! +mi i i $ 1, 61, 1A x m i i S i ; m fn ;�i 0 o v o m o 0 o v v rJ L. e n ' ,d a p + 3 3 a a p m ' o S a y t a a Q a y A $ ,' * g „. 0 „v F a R m 8 a f l �i a n 2 t“ ;E . 3 a s n � g aN g w O g w. L a n o w W. x w' 9 TO I Ng 5' I ,ma �o0Rg » g a og3 on a.. QQ c Q 2. v ' 3 i N S $ E o'm l $ i 3 a 121; •61k ; a SSz "a. B W n . �. ox z a s S t r, a $ Z i< a " H t " N . 3 a O R m o N j 3 a C g N r w ?� 1 - 2 „,CL �'U galN r Ar $ a n ' + a o ft Q g I a r s 1 $ z ! # s g 0 0 0 0 0 + o o + + + o n l' `u' NNNNNNn �e ��N" �NnIQS[ ENN `l+a {�S�+ NN_ _NN_ _N 5 § g g g g g g g 6 g o S e o 0 S 0 3 e 1 i t g g g g g g g I N N . . . . . . . N N N > (1“.""/. .• N N t t ♦ P N . . . . . . . N 1 • JJSCiaffiV 5/29/2015 7 Conditions Associated With 10:09:49AM �AGCEL/! Case #: ZON14-00045 1— per'► Condition Status Updated itle Hold Changed B TagDate Bye ll Code �; ,.. T. g Y Y.. 2001 PHASE 1 STORMWATER SITE PLAN None T MET 2/19/2015 JMP A Jefferson County Stormwater Site Plan SubmittalTemplate and Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)Template,Drainage Analysis&Stormwater Findings and SWPPPl1ESC Notes were submitted by Streamline Environmental,dated 10/29/2014. The proponent shall install the stormwater management facilities and implement the Best Management Practices(BMPs)in accordance with the Stormwater Management Manual forWestem Washington (SWMMWW)and as specified in the Stormwater Site Plan and associated Construction Documents prepared by Streamline EnvironmentaL Silt fence shall be installed per BMP C233 along the down gradient perimeter of development activities Installation of Silt Fence in other locations may be required to prevent sediment from leaving the site All Temporary Erosion&Sedimentation Control measures and protective measures for critical areas and significant trees shall be installed prior to initiating any land disturbing activities Prior to commencing land disturbing activity,the proponent shall request an inspection of the installation ofTemporary Erosion&Sedimentation Control(TESC)measures by Public Works. 2001 INSPECTION BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT None NOT MET 2/19/2015 JMP In order to ensure that stormwater management facilities are constructed per the approved plans the proponent shall request inspections by the Public Works Department during construction In order to enable the Department to conduct inspections in a timely manner,the applicant shall notify the Department in a timely manner regarding the project construction schedule Typical Inspections: -Installation of Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Measures(REQUIRED) -Clearing and Grading and road subgrade preparation -Placing roadway gravel base -Placing roadway crushed surfacing top course -Placing improved roadway surface(chip seal or asphalt concrete) -Paved Road Approach -Construction of stormwater management facilities(prior to backfill)(REQUIRED) -Additional inspections may be deemed necessary as project progresses 2001 PHASE 2 STORMWATER CERTIFICATION None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP After construction is complete and prior to DCD project fmal approval,the proponent shall submit a letter to the Public Works Department,from the Engineer of Record(EOR), certifying that the stormwater management facilities have been constructed per the approved plans and specifications It is the responsibility of the proponent to schedule inspections with the EOR,his designee and/or qualified inspection firm(s),approved by the EOR,to provide for said fmal certification. 2001 OPERATIONS&MAINTENANCE PLAN None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP Prior to final DCD project approval,the proponent shall submit an Operations and Maintenance Plan for the facility that is consistent with the requirements of the SWMMWW to the Public Works Department for review. 2001 SW FACILITY MAINTENANCE None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP AGREEMENT To ensure that the stormwater management facilities are appropriately maintained for the life of the project prior to final DCD project approval,the proponent shall be required to enter into a Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement with Jefferson County. The Public Works Department will send a copy of theAgreement,which has been signed by the Public Works Director,to the proponent. The proponent shall sign the Agreement before a notary,file it with the Jefferson County Auditor and notify Public Works when recorded. 2001 PUBLIC WORKS FEE REQUIREMENT None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP Prior to final DCD project approval,the proponent shall pay all costs related to the Public Works Department's application review,plan review,inspections, and preparation of the Stormwater Management Facility MaintenanceAgreement. In the event that fmal approval is denied by Jefferson County or the proposal is not completed,the proponent shall still be responsible for paying the Public Works Department's fee. 2001 LANDSCAPING INSTALLED None NOT MET 2/18/2015 JMP The required landscaping shall be installed prior to project occupancy. 2001 LANDSCAPE SCREENING REQUIRED None NOT MET 2/18/2015 JMP Page 1 of 4 CaseConditions..rpt 5/29/2015 qkCCEL/ ' Conditions Associated With 10:09:49AM Case #: ZON14-00045 Condition Status Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date By The landscape screening shall be installed as follows: Landscaping of Interior Lot Lines: "Screen-A" landscaping shall be installed as a full-screen visual barrier between the industrial site and residential zones to the west and north of the site This screening shall be fifteen(15)feet in depth. This full-screening shall at a minimum consist of a mix of primarily evegreen trees and shrubs generally interspersed to form a continuous year-round screen that grows to at least eight feet in height within two growing seasons Landscaping Road Frontage: "Screen-B" landscaping shall be installed as a filtered-screen visual separator between the industrial site and the frontage of West Fredericks Street. The screening shall be ten(10)feet in depth. The filtered screening shall at a minimum consist of a mix of evegreen and deciduous trees and shrubs generally interspersed to create a filtered screen that grows to at least eight feet in height within two growing seasons 2001 SIGN REGULATIONS None NOT MET 2/18/2015 JMP The installation of any sign shall be in conformance with Jeferson County Code 18.30.150. All non-exempt signs shall be subject to review and approval and may require issuance of a sign permit andor a building permit by the administrator according to a Type I permit approval process. 2001 EXTERIOR LIGHTING None NOT MET 2/18/2015 JMP Exterior lighting shall not exceed30 feet in height from the fmished grade Exterior lighting shall be energy-efficient and shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflections are contained within the boundaries of the parcel Exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rightsof-way. No lighting shall blink,flash,or be of unusually high intensity or brightness All lighting fixtures shall be appropriate in scale,intensity,and height to the use they are serving. Any.lighting installed in parking areas shall be of direct cutof design so that the source is not visible from adjacent property. 2001 DEVELOPMENT SETBACKS None NOT MET 2/18/2015 JMP Development setback from W.Fredericks Street is 20 feet. Setback from residential parcels on west and north property line is 25 feet. Setback from light industrial parcel on east property line is 10 feet. 2001 MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SURFACE None NOT MET 2/18/2015 JMP The maximum area of impervious surface coverage shall not exceed55%. The current proposal shows Phase 2 impervious surface coverage to be 54.7%. 2001 PARKING None NOT MET 2/18/2015 JMP Parking shall be designed so that vehicle ingress and egress to W.Fredericks Street(a collector roadway)are headed in a forward motion. 2001 NOISE None NOT MET 2/19/2015 JMP The intensity of sound emitted by any commercial or industrial activity shall not exceed levels established by theWashington State Department of Ecology under Chapter 173-60 WAC,and by Jefferson County under Resolution Na 67-85, `Establishment of Environmental Designations for Noise Abatement Areas for Jefferson Count' 2001 PROTECT SEPTIC AREAS None NOT MET 2/19/2015 JMP Cut and fill areas must not be in the area of any portion of the septic system or reserve drainfield area as permitted under SEP02-00111. Stormwater systems proposed on the site must meet the required30-foot downslope setback from the septic drainfield and reserve drainfield area 2001 SOLID WASTE PERMIT None NOT MET 2/19/2015 JMP If greater than 250 cubic yards of inert,demolition,and/or wood waste is used as fill material,a Solid Waste Handling permit may be required(WAC 173-350-990).Check with Department of Ecology, Waste 2 Resources,Julie Robertson(360) 407-6471. 2401 BMPs None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices(BMPs)to control stormwater,erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction,and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems 7001 F-PARKING PLAN None NOT MET 2/18/2015 JMP The applicant submitted a parking layout plan on December 11,2014 that conforms to the general parking standards of 18.30.100. 7001 F-LANDSCAPING PLAN None NOT MET 2/18/2015 JMP Page 2 of 4 CaseConditions..rpt 5/29/2015 • Conditions Associated With 10:09:49AM Case #: ZON14-00045 Condition Status Updated Code Titleo Sts Cb T Date By The applicant submitted a Landscaping Plan on December 11,2014 that complies with the landscapingscreening requirements of 18.30.130. 7202 F-Confnmed ESAs None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staf on 2/17/15 for the potential presence of Environmentally SensitiveAreas(ESAs)under the provisions of the Unified Development Code(UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area. 7204 F-Aquifer Recharge Area None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jeferson County. 7205 F-Susc.Aquifer Recharge Area None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers 7703 F-DNS Issued None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP Reviewed under the State Environmental PolicyAct(SEPA)by Jefferson County acting as lead agency. Determination of Non-Significance(DNS)issued on February 12,2015. 7754 F-ZONING None NOT MET 2/18/2015 IMP The parcel has been designated as Light Industrial under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 7760 F-General PMT Notice None NOT MET 2/19/2015 JMP Page 3 of 4 CaseConditions..rpt 5/29/2015 CCEL/�' Conditions Associated With 10:09:49AM Case #: ZON14-00045 Condition Status Updated Code Title Status Changed By Tag Date By NOTICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local state, and federal ordinances, regulations,or statutes applicable to the proposed development,but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jefferson County Unified Development Code If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered all activity in the immediate area shall be halted,and the Administrator shall be notified at once The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8,2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA,any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes" listed species(defined as causing harm,harassing,or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition,the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County may potentially be"critical habitat"for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline freshwater shoreline, or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken To minimize the potential to damage habitat,all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline freshwater shoreline, or floodplains are advised to do the following: -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes,wetlands,and forested areas near surface waters -Remove minimal vegetation for site development especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there -Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than dischaging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches The Federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act requires landowners within 660 feet(1/8th of a mile)of an eagle nest to consult with the US Fish and Wildlife Service. This Eagle Act prohibits anyone from"taking"bald eagles. This federal law defines the term"take" and describes the possible legal consequences when a"take" occurs. Among other actions, "take" includes a disturbance of bald eagles or their habitat Under federal law a permit may still be required for activities that impact bald eagles or their habitat Contact the US Fish and Wildlife Service(http://www.fws.gov/pacific/eagle/)to learn more about how this law affects your project Any individual,group,or agency can bring suit for a listed species"taking",even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist,and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle,or the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service. 8006 F-Property Location None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP The property is located at 192 West Fredericks Street. 8007 F-Surrounding Zones None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP The property to the North and West is zoned Rural Residential 1:5. The property to the East is zoned Light Industrial The property to the South is zoned Light IndustriaVCommercial. 8009 F-Consistent w Comp Plan None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP The proposed use is consistent with the goals,policies,and provisions of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Jefferson County Zoning Ordinance Na 09-0801-94. 8010 F-Permitted Use None NOT MET 2/18/2015 JMP The use applied for is consistent with the permitted uses and activities anticipated within the"Light Industrial zone". Page 4 of 4 CaseConditions..rpt ew¢s°N ccG JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT� .<� 621 Sheridan Street, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTnd,WA 98368 I Web: aS�rN��o Tel: 360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 (Email:dcd at co.iefferson.wa.us SquareONE Resource Center I Building Permits & Inspections I Development Review I Long Range Planning MEMORANDUM To: Carl Smith, UDC Administrator From: Joel Peterson Re: Approval of Dream City, LLC Landscaping Plan Date: September 2, 2015 Dream City, LLC developed Parcel 948601301 in the Light Industrial zoning district of Glen Cove. A condition of this development, applied to building permits BLD14-00460, BLD14-00461, and BLD14-00462, is to provide the required landscaping/screening per JCC 18.30.130. The site presented some topographical and logistical challenges to meeting the prescriptive requirements of the development code. In the General Provisions of JCC 18.30.130(2)(b), "the administrator may authorize variations to the landscaping/screening requirements of this section to: (i) provide consideration of topography, natural features, existing native vegetation and soils on the site and site location in relation to adjacent and surrounding uses." Specifically, Dream City, LLC is a marijuana production facility that is required to comply with state law regulating certain site requirements, including a 20-foot unobstructed surveillance corridor outside of the fence line. In coordination with the state Liquor and Cannabis Board regulatory officers, we agreed to narrow the surveillance corridor to approximately 10 feet to accommodate the County landscaping requirements, and to narrow the landscaping depth to approximately 10 feet to accommodate the surveillance corridor. Also, the back of the property (north property line) is a steep slope abutting heavily wooded, undeveloped residential parcels. The steepness of the slope makes an 8-foot screening at the property line ineffective. Although the subject development is hidden from view of any residences by the thick woods, the responsibility of maintaining a vegetative screening is the applicant's, not the neighboring residential parcels. The landscape screening solution applied to this property line is to allow the applicant to plant young trees on the property line which are intended to reach sufficient height in a longer timeframe beyond two years. This will avoid making the applicant install more expensive mature vegetation along a wooded area that already sufficiently screens the property, and will—in time—provide screeningif the neighboring parcels are logged or developed. 9 9 99 p The west property line is in a similarly wooded condition on the neighboring property as the north, and is restricted in the available depth of landscape screening. Required stormwater features interfere with meeting the prescriptive depth of plantings. There is an existing 6-foot chain-link fence on the property line. The proposed plantings will be a climbing plant that will solidly cover the existing fence and provide growth reaching a short distance above the top of the 6-foot fence. This will also allow a line of sight surveillance area on this side. I find that the proposed landscaping plan fulfills the performance intended by the development regulations to screen neighboring uses from the Dream City, LLC development. Concurrence for administrative authorization to vary the landscape/screening requirements per the proposed landscape plan: Carl Smith, Director/UDC Administrator Date 430N coU JEFFERSON COUNTY { DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan o� Tel:360.379.450�tFax 360.379.4451 Emrt Townsend,WA aifidcda(78 I bo.iefferson.wa.usn.wa.us/communitvdevelopment •=iNG SquareONE Resource Center I Building Permits 8 Inspections I Development Review I Long Range Planning MEMORANDUM To: Carl Smith, UDC Administrator From: Joel Peterson Re: Approval of Dream City, LLC Landscaping Plan Date: September 2, 2015 Dream City, LLC developed Parcel 948601301 in the Light Industrial zoning district of Glen Cove. A condition of this development, applied to building permits BLD14-00460, BLD14-00461, and BLD14-00462, is to provide the required landscaping/screening per JCC 18.30.130. The site presented some topographical and logistical challenges to meeting the prescriptive requirements of the development code. In the General Provisions of JCC 18.30.130(2)(b), "the administrator may authorize variations to the landscaping/screening requirements of this section to: (i) provide consideration of topography, natural features, existing native vegetation and soils on the site and site location in relation to adjacent and surrounding uses." Specifically, Dream City, LLC is a marijuana production facility that is required to comply with state law regulating certain site requirements, including a 20-foot unobstructed surveillance corridor outside of the fence line. In coordination with the state Liquor and Cannabis Board regulatory officers, we agreed to narrow the surveillance corridor to approximately 10 feet to accommodate the County landscaping requirements, and to narrow the landscaping depth to approximately 10 feet to accommodate the surveillance corridor. Also, the back of the property (north property line) is a steep slope abutting heavily wooded, undeveloped residential parcels. The steepness of the slope makes an 8-foot screening at the property line ineffective. Although the subject development is hidden from view of any residences by the thick woods, the responsibility of maintaining a vegetative screening is the applicant's, not the neighboring residential parcels. The landscape screening solution applied to this property line is to allow the applicant to plant young trees on the property line which are intended to reach sufficient height in a longer timeframe beyond two years. This will avoid making the applicant install more expensive mature vegetation along a wooded area that already sufficiently screens the property, and will—in time—provide screening if the neighboring parcels are logged or developed. The west property line is in a similarly wooded condition on the neighboring property as the north, and is restricted in the available depth of landscape screening. Required stormwater features interfere with meeting the prescriptive depth of plantings. There is an existing 6-foot chain-link fence on the property line. The proposed plantings will be a climbing plant that will solidly cover the existing fence and provide growth reaching a short distance above the top of the 6-foot fence. This will also allow a line of sight surveillance area on this side. I find that the proposed landscaping plan fulfills the performance intended by the development regulations to screen neighboring uses from the Dream City, LLC development. Concurrence for administrative authorization to vary the landscape/screening requirements per the proposed landscape plan: 9/ Carl Smith, Director/UDC Administrator Date TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360)379-4450 FAX (360)379-4451 (800) 831-2678 PERMIT#: BLD14-00462 Issue Date 9/30/2015 SITE ADDRESS: 192 W FREDERICKS ST �` �, Expiration Date 10/30/2015 ,1 PORT TOWNSEND, 98368 APPLICANT: DREAM CITY LLC PHONE: 360-531-0804 PO BOX 1909 PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368-0062 SUBDIVISION: 9486 - EISENBEIS BAY VIEW Block: Lot: PARCEL NUMBER: 948601301 Section: 16 Township: 30 N Range: 1W PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Building D &-E- &F : pre-engineered greenhouses. 1-502. Unheated: minimal heat, radiant- No Plumbing- SEP02-00111 THE PROJECT LISTED ABOVE COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2012 EDITION. OCCUPANCY GROUP: U-1 UBC TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: THE PROJECT RECEIVED ITS TEMPORARY SIGN OFF ON THIS DOCUMENT IS VALID FOR THE DATES LISTED ABOVE. THE BUILDING MUST RECEIVE A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WITHIN THAT TIME OR THE TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY WILL BE NULL AND VOID. lltidemarkldata\forms\F_BLD_Temp_Occupancy.rpt 9/30/2015 Joel Peterson From: Mary Blain Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 2:22 PM To: Joel Peterson Subject: RE: Dream City Signoffs Made Joel, sf'-If you could sign off the final planning approval activity in the hard copy BLD files,that would be great. Before we can final and send the C/O for each building,the following needs to be addressed: BLD14-00460: BLD A • Add Info Request from DRD signed off • Sep system finaled (SEP14-143) must be signed off (SEP14-143 is still only in "Approved" status. It must be in "finaled" status prior to BLD final. BLD14-00461: BLD B • Airseal Inspection • Framing inspection • Sep system Final BLD14-00462: Greenhouses • Ready for final Please let me know if you have additional questions. Mary Blain Plans Examiner I Dept of Community Development 621 Sheridan St Port Townsend,WA 98368 ph: 360-379-4461 fax: 360-379-4451 mblain@co jefferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law, including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From:Joel Peterson Sent:Thursday, November 05, 2015 12:20 PM 1 To: Mary Blain <mblain@co.jefferson.wa.us> Subject: Dream City Signoffs Made Mary, I made a site visit to Dream City, LLC and confirmed the landscaping installation. I've signed off all the land use activities. Bill Staples would like to know if this means the Certificate of Occupancys can be issued, or what is left from the building department that requires an inspection.Thanks. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpetersonco.lefferson.wa.us Case Browse Query Select GIS I Help Cancel 1-Case# Address IS A 'm1814-00690 Name Parcel# Project Name Case# BLD14-00461 BUILDING B PRE ENGINEERED STEEL BLD. 7000 SQ FT UNHEATEDsep02-00111/and tank only SEP 14-143 BLD14-00462 Building D &-E- 8F : pre-engineered greenhouses. I-502.Unheated:minimal heat,radiant-No Plumbing-5 BLD14-00467 NEW FENCE PERMIT 8' FT TALL SIGHT-OBSCURING PERIMETER FENCE(I-502) ZON14-00045 THIS IS A PHASE 1 STORMWATER(CLEARING AND GRADING)PERMIT FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT OF LIGHT I It I 2 Joel Peterson From: Mary Blain Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 2:50 PM To: Joel Peterson Subject: RE:Temporary Occupancy Permit Renewal for Dream City Attachments: tcodreamcity.rtf Categories: CASE ACTION Joel, Attached is the TCO for Dream City. We need the director's approval of the extension in writing in the BLD file to cover us. Should I snalil mail this anywhere or did you want to do that? Mary From:Joel Peterson Sent:Wednesday,September 30, 2015 9:49 AM To: Mary Blain <mblain@co.jefferson.wa.us> Subject: RE:Temporary Occupancy Permit Renewal for Dream City Thanks Mary. The date is below: October 30, 2015. Please also send a copy to me for the case file. Thanks for your help! Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpetersonCa)co.iefferson.wa.us From: Mary Blain Sent:Wednesday, September 30, 2015 8:43 AM To:Joel Peterson<JPeterson@co.iefferson.wa.us> Subject: RE: Temporary Occupancy Permit Renewal for Dream City Joel, I can print the TCO if you need. Just tell me what date I should put on there for expiration and I can either send it out, or scan and email it to whoever you need. Mary From:Joel Peterson Sent:Tuesday, September 29, 2015 5:02 PM 1 To: Mary Blain<mblain@co.iefferson.wa.us> Cc: David Goldsmith<DGoldsmith@co.jefferson.wa.us> Subject:Temporary Occupancy Permit Renewal for Dream City Mary, Adam Kelly of Dream City, LLC requested an extension to his Temporary Occupancy (T.O.) Permit for BLD14-00462—the permit for the greenhouses. The original expiration date of October 2, 2015,was from our negotiated landscaping requirement deadline. Also, Adam wanted additional time for some rewiring project. So that we don't need to go through another extension, we agreed on an October 30, 2015 deadline for the new T.O. I'd like to deliver that update to him before the current one expires. Do you print those T.O. permits or should I talk to Sally. I'll forward the form to David G. with an explanation for his signature. Thanks. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpetersonco.jefferson.wa.us 2 TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360)379-4450 FAX (360)379-4451 (800) 831-2678 PERMIT #: BLD14-00462 Issue Date 9/30/2015 SITE ADDRESS: 192 W FREDERICKS ST Expiration Date 10/30/2015 PORT TOWNSEND, 98368 APPLICANT: DREAM CITY LLC PHONE: 360-531-0804 PO BOX 1909 PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368-0062 SUBDIVISION: 9486 - EISENBEIS BAY VIEW Block: Lot: PARCEL NUMBER: 948601301 Section: 16 Township: 30 N Range: 1W PROJECT DESCRIPTION:Building D &-E- &F : pre-engineered greenhouses. 1-502. Unheated: minimal heat, radiant- No Plumbing- SEP02-00111 THE PROJECT LISTED ABOVE COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2012 EDITION. OCCUPANCY GROUP: U-1 UBC TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: THE PROJECT RECEIVED ITS TEMPORARY SIGN OFF ON THIS DOCUMENT IS VALID FOR THE DATES LISTED ABOVE. THE BUILDING MUST RECEIVE A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WITHIN THAT TIME OR THE TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY WILL BE NULL AND VOID. \\tidemark\data\forms\F_BLD_Temp_Occupancy.rpt 9/30/2015 Joel Peterson From: Joel Peterson Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 3:24 PM To: 'Adam Kelly' Cc: Mary Blain Subject: Substitutions on Landscaping Plan BLD14-00462 Attachments: [Untitled].pdf Adam: I've attached a scan of the Landscaping Plan with annotations for your proposed plant substitutions. The substitutions are approved and become part of the current approved Landscaping Plan. I will work on an updated Temporary Occupancy Permit for the greenhouses and put a new expiration date of October 30, 2015 on this updated permit and put it in the mail to you. Joel Peterson Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 j peterson(a�co.jefferson.wa.us 1 Joel Peterson From: Mary Blain Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 3:56 PM To: Adam Kelly;Joel Peterson Subject: RE: dream city progress Adam, You are correct. L&I signs off electrical, we inspect framing and then again after sheetrock to check for nailing patterns. Yes, permits BLD14-460(building A)and BLD14-00461 (building B) have an expiration date of 3/27/2016. Permit BLD14-462 (building D, E & F,greenhouses)expires on 4/29/2016 and BLD14-467 (fence)expires on 2/24/2016. Also, BLD15-10(demo existing 3-sided shed), which expires 1/21/2016 can be finaled at any other inspections, if it has already been demoed. I am curious, when you said you have passed inspection by Mike Anderson, are you referring to the architect? And if so, what inspection did he perform? Please let me know if you have any building questions. And I appreciate your desire to work collaboratively with the county, it makes everyone's job easier. Mary Blain Plans Examiner I Dept of Community Development 621 Sheridan St Port Townsend, WA 98368 ph: 360-379-4461 fax: 360-379-4451 mblain@cojefferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law, including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. 1 From:Adam Kelly[mailto:flowerfarmer926@gmail.com] Sent:Thursday, September 17, 2015 3:31 PM To:Joel Peterson<JPeterson@co.jefferson.wa.us>; Mary Blain<mblain@co.jefferson.wa.us> Subject:dream city progress Hello Joel and Mary. My name is Adam Kelly. I spoke with both of you on the phone recently. Im the new Director of Operations at Dream City on Fredericks St. Id like to make you aware of the progress that has been made on our construction and appeal to you for a realistic schedule of completion based on new circumstances. Ill be as brief as possible. Thanks for your time. As you are probably aware, this project has been a nine headed monster. Original team members have left us and we are doing our absolute best to respect the relationship with you folks while trying to get our projects completed. The landscape is less of a concern to me than the buildings. I am in the process of getting plants ordered. These things usually take a matter of days to be shipped in and i believe that the amount of work that needs to be done outside can be done in about one week. Im having trouble locating some of the bigger items because of the time of year. They generally wont dig B&B evergreens in fall but rather in spring. Im trying to find a way around that. Most of the plants have been found and secured. If possible, i am requesting an additional week or so on the landscape. I dont want to drag this thing out but its a matter of physically obtaining the plants previously approved in our plan. Buildings A and B... this is a different story. I apologize if some of this information is redundant, i came in late in the game. Building A: So we have (finally) figured out our issues with the security wires and cameras. We have passed inspection with Mike Anderson and we are poised to switch out camera wires any day now, as soon as the wire arrives. We had a major issue with the drywaller. His estimate came in at $7k, he did half of the work(and poorly), asked for$7k more, we gave it to him, he then asked for$35k more than that to complete the work, at which time we had to let him go. This has created major setbacks in finishing drywall,running remaining wires,painting, getting infrastructure installed(fans and lights,plumbing etc) and has prevented the electrician from getting into the building to do his work. We have since found another drywaller and painter. The drywall was just finished in east building A,painting will be finished tomorrow. West building A drywall starts monday, will be five days of work and painting thereafter. We can then finish trimming out and do the electrical work. Building B still needs to be designed,then electrical needs are communicated to the contractor,they install, L&I inspects,you inspect framing, we drywall, you inspect again? Then the rest of it gets buttoned up. Is this fairly on target? This amount of work will take months and i just want to make sure im not over staying my welcome with you folks. Please let me know if i am still in line or if additional conversations,permits, or details need to take place. My understanding is that the BUILDING related CO's are NOT in fact due Oct 2nd but rather March of 2016 . Please confirm this. 2 / ;�' C' y �^ 4- /) K Rl D 'D .d"t ° # -i 1 a x < � a*o Jv -, _. 5 :Om -4cnF m o v - �. to -oz.a, y to-0 •-,.1 r. Cv Y / ''\ N << � m 3c 01; 3 aomlo ,-^cc., v°, `. �. (f 2 -4. x0 10 3 ' m1 Kx m CD m a0m 0 cn•Q CD; 5 �t7F SW x.1 m3 m- 17,rno. m a53.m mcn < N c•0 ., t --. i 0 °Ei N ^.i 7 ��. .. o N p 10 m Z?Ip O idT <.''1 i i 2 nw � m 31 CO (I) CD co f of mG�m a co ca DU mr : 3m <. m —O �1 ED g f3 i?;-.A c �a� w Qwm n J � noo — 9, I � /degri• ' �0 04 _� J I<- • c N G I•Tl O m v '3'..N.. 1 1 ,, 1 1 „o a I n. �� _ 3 c�li1 �Sfit I m g �' -- �'___ o� — 1 '1 eV �.a co I N 1 m °o. • m it. I A — 6 1. G 0 ,a �i `A tn !!1 1. ►�0 n n m I X 11 �•o mrnai $ _ I 2 O mo m o rn . 3`o tn . v _ — •`•I c (D 0 p. _ iii(17O ` y( Fu O Q ) � a NmW 0 P • � � o T E. _ N o �"_ c--_____,- — 4—oi oma s 'aKo c' 'T. 0 0 x 3 f.0 " a°9...a' adrnS%I. O f"--4 (� — N Pt _'a a° m5 v o i X1111 3mN 00= / I o < _ o' '.^" c_Dacp 0 1_ �o o T 1 0O 0 1t 4-— ma _, nom. S.'(3 x I an—, o m (D 11 _ / o 0o_ 'c j 1 m0 pDX ON o- o . mm, �_ ,`'� D oo +/ yo Sys _Ei I oxo rn I ry — 0 1 0 - al a.-I o v° s}nodsumoa}ooa.9 XIS g I / m 5- ,-.. •� =? p 1 .a, > 3 0= N =— •-d 3 co N O Sn0Wadw m N �/ o o O 5 -I m g 0 a I dasnoq u we ZLX,ZE Pasodom ��_ o v i ay NTD • I i I ' ` I�OOZ r 0 I Ia:\ —a m I ( _1^W ti.O i i �tS -po y • 1 i -d Qm0,m ` ' . � ti �`° s �� O I a� -m va I 0 CD ��J �'M 1 ON 90 NOW ��" * o , m n ( / 1 �, — w o�, o v w o0 0 -►�'1++ N 1, TC 0 1 '9 to n 0 P' m .n m I ► �; k in —I 3 o -d m C'-3 a , 2 W N O trD t m— Amo c o o N (2 o n� Z —J 11 j• g- S- N y t17 P CO Q ' O 11 ta •tn� o, m o s}nodsumoa}ooa.9 X!S : m o v N c . -. ■• N o' o- 11 q _ Vti' dStiO9'6=easysnom�adwl a g O 1 W I �1 , -m En n Z asnoyuaa�J ZLX,ZE L Pasodad I —I m 1 r+ r-i `G ' Z = O 1 =! to E. I? N a y '-a-0 c 1 bor o 0 a L• ! `\ W O ♦ =N /+tO N II 5. T CO S}nodsuMoa}oOb,9 oMl}o wnwIu!W 1 o W N —� N �' dS 89l'£=easy snowadwl I I Q JP p I £asnoyuaai ,17ZX,Z£i-PasodoJd 01 01 m O 1 x tia .p = 01 W D ' 1;'y- .. ,' TlV - m (D TI ((D O { o m (D SD (D 1 < �Z1d N FL iv O n co _ i (�D o0 Ci ^ , c m 30 , .) (CD n N CD 1 COD`< �\ > yo:" w o 0 To:Joel Peterson Cc: Bill Staples Subject: Landscape Proposal for Dream City, LLC Joel Peterson Associate Planner Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Dear Joel, I would like to present to the you my landscaping proposal for Dream City, LLC in accordance with Jefferson County code 18.30.130. After reading through the provisions carefully I have designed a plan that allows for both WSLCB and JCC requirements to be met. There is a bit of conflict in the set of guidelines as we discussed at our meeting on Tuesday, but I feel like after allowing for a bit of rationale and creativity, I have produced a plan that would bring all parties involved to absolute satisfaction. The largest part of this project is addressing the south side of the property, and area of the main entry, which runs alongside the road shared by other industrial sites. There is a 20ft wide strip of land running the entirety of this frontage measured from the road to the l Oft high constructed corrugated metal fencing. The length of this space needing plantings is a little greater than 320ft. As required by 18.30.130,type B landscaping calls for a filtered screen consisting of a mix of evergreen and deciduous plantings. I would like to use 'Green Giant' evergreen cedar as the majority in this particular space. The trees should be positioned mid way between the fence and the road and run the entire length of the south fence, which is approximately 320ft. 'Green Giants' grow to 30ft tall and up to 10ft wide. I will plant them on 10 foot centers and staggered, so that at full maturity the tips will barely touch. A staggered positioning allows for a softer, more aesthetically pleasing flow,which takes away from the heavy, institutionalized feel the metal fence lends. The proposed plantings will begin spaced ten feet away from the fence and ten feet from the road. This particular spacing and flow will allow for open surveillance in the 20ft space, with no plantings occurring any closer than ten feet of the fence. There are also two transformers located along this fence line, and in accordance with 18.30.130, a screen created by evergreen 'Green Giant'will satisfy this requirement. Scattered amongst the evergreen cedars in this plan I would like to plant a wild rose as my continued effort to soften the appeal from the road. One other section to the left of the main gate entry needs to be addressed,which allows only for enough space for an evergreen cedar along with one of my proposed evergreen vines I will be using along the west facing chain link fence that continues behind this space. As far as the west side of the property is concerned, there is only a small space, allowed for plantings. The strip of land that was left in between the chain link fence,runs the perimeter of the property line and the outer banks of the swale created by the city. The space is extremely narrow and limiting to a very small category of plantings to achieve the necessary screening for the required type A landscaping. I would like to plant an evergreen vine alongside the fence every ten feet. My first choice is evergreen jasmine, which provides a delicious bouquet of fragrance in bloom,prevalent in most of the warm season, or Lady Banks Rose, depending on plant availability. Both vines have the potential to grow to 20ft in height, but will top out heavily achieving a height of 10-12ft quickly. Even though both of these vines grow 20-25ft in length, I will plant them at ten foot centers so that the necessary screening is provided within two growing seasons as required by JCC. Which brings us to our final fence line in need of addressing, the north side of the property which runs adjacent to heavily wooded, undeveloped land. This 300ft stretch of land is fully enclosed by the solid loft metal corrugated fencing, offering no available sight of activity from within the work premise to anyone who would 2 �' be in the woods. I would like to propose leaving this space as is for the time being for the reason provided under General Provisions part(a) of 18.30.130: (a)Existing trees, vegetative plantings, undisturbed open space, and or topographic natural features which meet or exceed these standards shall be considered to fulfill the landscaping or screening requirements of this section and any other reference to these screening requirements in other sections of this code. This would allow the adjacent landowner to decide at the time he/she begins to develop the land, the landscape requirements they would like to see to meet their own needs as well as JCC regulations. The plants chosen for this project are ones that once established will require little to no water, strong disease resistance, and strong root systems for optimum performance given the condition of the mostly sandy soil. I would like to begin this project immediately upon approval to allow enough time for preparation of the site, plant installation, and the addressing of any obstacles that may come up along the way. Setting a completion date for October 1, gives myself and all other workers involved the time necessary to fulfill the needs set forth in this project. An Oct. 2nd date could be scheduled for a final inspection to be conducted by the WSLCB and Jefferson County code officials. Thank you so much Joel for your assistance in this matter. I look forward to working with you. Sincerely, Kelli Slater Horticultural Consultant for Dream City, LLC 3 18.30.130 Landscaping/screening.P. sHARe (1)Application. Landscaping or screening shall be provided for all multifamily residential, commercial and industrial land uses,small-scale recreational and tourist uses, and as required in other sections of this code, except that landscaping will not be required of industrial uses within the resource-based industrial district when the development is sufficiently screened from public view. (2)General Provisions. (a)Existing trees,vegetative plantings, undisturbed open space, and/or topographic or natural features which meet or exceed these standards shall be considered to fulfill the landscaping or screening requirements of this section and any other applicable reference to these screening requirements in other sections of this code. (b)The administrator may authorize variations to the landscaping/screening requirements of this section to: (i)Provide consideration of topography, natural features,existing native vegetation and soils on the site and site location in relation to adjacent and surrounding uses; (ii)Allow alternative plant mixes or berming that accomplish the purposes of the type of landscape screening required; (iii)Conserve water through the concept of xeriscaping; (iv)Provide flexibility in the size of initial plantings; and (v)Ensure that any nonresidential use,structure or activity when proposed in a rural residential (RR)district shall be compatible with that of existing and anticipated future uses in the district. (3)Landscape Screening.The three types of landscaping screens are described and applied as follows. (a)"Screen-A"landscaping: (i) Is a"full screen"that functions as a visual barrier.This landscaping is typically found between residential and nonresidential areas; (ii) Shall at a minimum consist of: (A)A mix of primarily evergreen trees and shrubs generally interspersed to form a continuous year-round screen that grows to at least eight feet in height within two growing seasons. (b)"Screen-B" landscaping: (i)Is a "filtered screen"that functions as a visual separator.This landscaping is typically found between commercial and industrial uses; between differing types of residential development; and to screen industrial uses from the road; (ii)Shall at a minimum consist of: (A)A mix of evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs generally interspersed to create a filtered screen that grows to at least eight feet in height within two growing seasons. (c)"Screen-C"landscaping: • (i)Is a "see-through screen"that functions as a partial visual separator to soften the appearance of parking areas and building elevations.This landscaping is typically found along road frontage or between multiple-family developments; (ii)Shall at a minimum consist of: (A)A mix of evergreen and deciduous trees or shrubs generally interspersed to create a continuous canopy. (4) Landscaping Road Frontages.The average width or depth of perimeter landscaping along road frontages and required locations on private property shall be provided as follows: (a)Ten feet of Screen-B landscaping shall be provided for an industrial development. (b)Ten feet of Screen-B landscaping shall be provided for all above-ground utility facilities or development,excluding distribution and transmission corridors, located outside a public right-of way. T (c)Ten feet of Screen-C landscaping shall be provided for all commercial or multiple-family residential development. (5) Landscaping of Interior Lot Lines.The average width or depth of perimeter landscaping along interior lot lines shall be provided as follows: ( Fifteen et of Screen-A landscaping shall be included in all commercial, industrial, or small- scale recreational and tourist development along any portion adjacent to a residential use or district, except as may be varied by the administrator under subsection(2)(b)of this section. (b)Ten feet of Screen-B landscaping shall be included in all multiple-family development along any portion adjacent to a single-family residential use and in an industrial development along any portion adjacent to a nonindustrial development, except as provided in subsection(5)(a)of this section. (6)Landscaping for Parking Lots. Landscaping shall be provided for commercial, industrial,small-scale recreational and tourist uses, and multifamily residential use surface parking lots,with five or more parking stalls, as follows: (a)Screening shall be provided on each side,front,and/or rear of a parking lot where such side, front,and/or rear abuts any residential use or district, except that no screening is required where the elevation of the parking area lot line is four feet higher than the finished elevation of the parking area surface. (b)Parking lot screening and landscaping shall be kept in good condition and shall meet the following conditions: (i)It shall be continuous where required along a side,front or rear of a parking area and shall not be less than four feet in height above the grade of the parking lot surface, broken only for accessways and aisles; provided,that the screening shall not be permitted for a distance of 20 feet on each side of a parking area accessway to ensure proper sight distance.Where screening is prohibited by the above provisions, low lying shrubs or other similar plantings shall be placed;such plantings shall riot be allowed to exceed three feet in height. (ii)Screening shall not be installed in such a manner as to obstruct the free use of any fire hydrant. (iii)The space between the landscaping screen and the right-of-way, except for any pedestrian access improvements, shall be landscaped with grass, shrubs,trees,or evergreen groundcover. On the sides and rear of parking areas not facing a street, such landscaping shall be required between screening and the lot line. (7) Landscape Plan.When screening is required, a landscaping plan shall be submitted with the project application to indicate how the minimum screening requirements are met.The plan must meet the following requirements: (a)The landscape plan shall be drawn on the same base map as the development plans or on a separate sheet properly labeled and shall identify the following: (i)Total landscape area; (ii)Landscape materials, plant names, and applicable size; (iii)Property lines; (iv)Impervious surfaces; (v)Existing or proposed structures,fences, and retaining walls; and (vi)Natural features or vegetation left in natural state. (b)The required landscaping shall be installed prior to project occupancy. However, a certificate of occupancy may be issued prior to installation of the required landscaping if a bond or other form of appropriate surety is posted in a manner acceptable to the administrator.The time limit for compliance may be extended to allow installation of such required landscaping during the next planting season. (8) Maintenance. (a)All landscaping and necessary support systems shall be maintained for the life of the project. 7c.) _su iG{; f/e - c9 7 4fDr( f acc.cA 1 Y 'G(0/11P/( 4< Joel Peterson I From: Kelli Slater<herbangi@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 10:58 AM To: Joel Peterson Cc: Bill Staples Subject: Landscape Proposal for Dream City, LLC Joel Peterson Associate Planner Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Dear Joel, I would like to present to the you my landscaping proposal for Dream City, LLC in accordance with Jefferson County code 18.30.130. After reading through the provisions carefully I have designed a plan that allows for both WSLCB and JCC requirements to be met. There is a bit of conflict in the set of guidelines as we discussed at our meeting on Tuesday,but I feel like after allowing for a bit of rationale and creativity, I have produced a plan that would bring all parties involved to absolute satisfaction. The largest part of this project is addressing the south side of the property, and area of the main entry,which runs alongside the road shared by other industrial sites. There is a 20ft wide strip of land running the entirety of this frontage measured from the road to the l Oft high constructed corrugated metal fencing. The length of this space needing plantings is a little greater than 320ft. As required by 18.30.130,type B landscaping calls for a filtered screen consisting of a mix of evergreen and deciduous plantings. I would like to use 'Green Giant' evergreen cedar as the majority in this particular space. The trees should be positioned mid way between the fence and the road and run the entire length of the south fence, which is approximately 320ft. 'Green Giants' grow to 30ft tall and up to l Oft wide. I will plant them on 10 foot centers and staggered, so that at full maturity the tips will barely touch. A staggered positioning allows for a softer, more aesthetically pleasing flow,which takes away from the heavy, institutionalized feel the metal fence lends. The proposed plantings will begin spaced ten feet away from the fence and ten feet from the road. This particular spacing and flow will allow for open surveillance in the 20ft space, with no plantings occurring any closer than ten feet of the fence. There are also two transformers located along this fence line, and in accordance with 18.30.130, a screen created by evergreen'Green Giant' will satisfy this requirement. Scattered amongst the evergreen cedars in this plan I would like to plant a wild rose as my continued effort to soften the appeal from the road. One other section to the left of the main gate entry needs to be addressed, which allows only for enough space for an evergreen cedar along with one of my proposed evergreen vines I will be using along the west facing chain link fence that continues behind this space. As far as the west side of the property is concerned,there is only a small space, allowed for plantings. The strip of land that was left in between the chain link fence, runs the perimeter of the property line and the outer banks of the swale created by the city. The space is extremely narrow and limiting to a very small category of plantings to achieve the necessary screening for the required type A landscaping. I would like to plant an evergreen vine alongside the fence every ten feet. My first choice is evergreen jasmine,which provides a delicious bouquet of fragrance in bloom,prevalent in most of the warm season,or Lady Banks Rose, depending on plant availability. Both vines have the potential to grow to 2011 in height,but will top out heavily achieving a height of 10-12ft quickly. Even though both of these vines grow 20-25ft in length, I will plant them at ten foot centers so that the necessary screening is provided within two growing seasons as required by JCC. 1 Which brings us to our final fence line in need of addressing,the north side of the property which runs adjacent to heavily wooded, undeveloped land. This 300ft stretch of land is fully enclosed by the solid l Oft metal corrugated fencing, offering no available sight of activity from within the work premise to anyone who would be in the woods. I would like to propose leaving this space as is for the time being for the reason provided under General Provisions part(a)of 18.30.130: (a)Existing trees,vegetative plantings, undisturbed open space, and or topographic natural features which meet or exceed these standards shall be considered to fulfill the landscaping or screening requirements of this section and any other reference to these screening requirements in other sections of this code. This would allow the adjacent landowner to decide at the time he/she begins to develop the land, the landscape requirements they would like to see to meet their own needs as well as JCC regulations. The plants chosen for this project are ones that once established will require little to no water, strong disease resistance, and strong root systems for optimum performance given the condition of the mostly sandy soil. I would like to begin this project immediately upon approval to allow enough time for preparation of the site, plant installation, and the addressin• . . 1 • • tbat ma come up along the way. Setting a completion date for October 1 • yself and all other workers involved t - e necessary to fulfill the needs set forth in this pro' ct. An Oct. 2nd date could be scheduled for a fin. '_•-section to be conducted by the WSLCB and Jefferson �aff�ss = Thank you so much Joel for your assistance in this matter. I look forward to working with you. Sincerely, Kelli Slater Horticultural Consultant for Dream City, LLC 2 Joel Peterson From: Joel Peterson Sent: Friday,July 10, 2015 12:50 PM To: Kelli Slater Cc: Carl Smith; 'Bill Staples'; Mary Blain; Eric Kuzma Subject: RE: Landscape Proposal for Dream City, LLC Kelli, This is a note confirming that I've received your Landscape Proposal for Dream City, LLC, and that it meets the requirement of our landscaping information request,for consideration of the greenhouse Temporary Occupancy permit for BLD14-00462. Please be aware that further coordination between Dream City,the State Liquor and Cannabis Board, and Community Development will need to occur before we approve the full Landscaping Plan. We will assist you as expeditiously as we can so that you may begin work as soon as possible. With this exception of meeting the landscaping requirements, all inspection signoffs must be complete on case BLD14- 00462 (which includes stormwater requirements articulated in permit ZON14-00045) before we can issue the Temporary Occupancy permit. Remaining activity signoffs include documentation between the Engineer of Record and Public Works Department: 1) certification by the engineer of record stating the stormwater management facilities have been constructed per the approved plans and specifications, 2)Operations and Maintenance Plan for the stormwater facility and 3) Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement with Jefferson County Public Works. Fourth,a letter of results from the 3rd party review of the greenhouse construction is needed by DCD Building Division. Please provide these reports before requesting the final inspection. We appreciate your efforts. Please contact me if you have additional questions. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson Aco.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW `st SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From: Kelli Slater [mailto:herbanqi@gmail.com] Sent: Friday,July 10, 2015 10:58 AM 1 Joel Peterson From: Joel Peterson Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 11:27 AM To: 'susan.anderson@Icb.wa.gov' Cc: Carl Smith; Kelli Slater(herbanqi@gmail.com); 'Bill Staples'; Simon Little (simon@studio- stl.com) Subject: Jefferson County Landscaping Requirements at Dream City Attachments: Dream City Landscaping & Fence Layout Plans.pdf; Jefferson County Landscaping Code.pdf Officer Susan Anderson, Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board: Thank you for the conversation today about State surveillance requirements and Jefferson County landscaping requirements at the Dream City, LLC marijuana production facility. I've attached the county approved site plan sheets for landscaping and fencing. Clearly,they do not take into consideration a 20-foot surveillance corridor exterior of the erimeter of required fencingper WAC 314-55- P 4 083(3)(a)(iii). The County has approved a site plan that meets our landscaping requirements; and the fence placement directly against the landscape areas does not conflict with our development regulations. Also attached is the Jefferson County Code 18.30.130 Landscaping/screening, with the pertinent landscaping references highlighted. JCC 18.30.130 allows the administrator to authorize variations to the landscaping/screening requirements to ensure compatibility of the requirements to the site. We have not yet received a specific proposal to review,so we have not yet considered any administrative variations to the landscaping identified on the approved site plans. I welcome further discussion with you regarding any discretionary modifications to the application of the WAC at this site, and how we can guide the project proponent toward a landscaping solution at this site that meets both of our performance standards. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner.Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 j Peterson gco.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 1 7 - 1 -14) p Joel Peterson Cat' j/ma,/ - ,9e7 From: Linda Atkins e 61 'r FYVIl- (or ).riz siLwi,As-TS 1 Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 8:56 AM . 'tA�" rNe_ e. c� cY.�l t+ cti r `j't -nJ'P5 ct5 To: Joel Peterson Subject: RE: Question Re: Susan's SEP14-143 Permit, and BLD14-462 -- Dream City, LLC CI/Sf (4e Joel. Susan signed off the Septic Finaled activity already because it does not involve septic review since no plumbing. No reason for us to give any approval for temporary occupancy. Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist, JCPH Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 A(ways working fora safer and-hearthier Jefferson County crttl-rnerrlALlry s011LE: This e-mail message, including ally at taehments; is for the sole use of the intended recipient(S) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review; use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Ail c-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and istherefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCW 42.x6. finder the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from disclosure under state law, including RCW 42.56 From:Joel Peterson Sent: Monday,June 29, 2015 3:15 PM To: Linda Atkins Subject: Question Re:Susan's SEP14-143 Permit, and BLD14-462 -- Dream City, LLC Linda, Dream City requests Temporary Occupancy permits for their greenhouses under BLD14-462. There is no septic use by the greenhouses,the septic review activities appear to have been signed off. Will you give a short reply if there is/is not any concern by EH to give Dream City a Temporary Occupancy permit for the greenhouses? (It's temporary because they want to defer the landscaping requirements to early fall.) [Note:The site development includes two other building permits: BLD14-00460 and BLD14-00461,that uses the septic system, and so we would require the septic to be completed for those occupancy permits. Looks like the pressure test is the last septic activity to sign off.] Thanks. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson p co.iefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW 1 Joel Peterson From: Sally Ellis Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 8:21 AM To: Joel Peterson Cc: Randy Marx; Evan Dobrowski Subject: bId14-00462 -SEP14-00143 t.,Joel- Look at the conditions on Building permitiBLD14-00462 - I am pretty sure-this condition was already meet- but need to double check with you- (ZON14-00045) The applicant shall meet all conditions associated with the Land Use and Stormwater Permit ZON14-00045 which are attached to this building permit, along with all conditions directly entered into this building permit. Envirnomental Health- Please look at SEP14-00143 and please tell me what is left-so I can call Dream City and tell them what they need to do. 7 � Thank you c— gi 3--/- 1 4_, A,rrire,AO (/v`ri5 6 - Sally L Ellis l Jefferson County Community Development f Permit Technician G-.i'-- 1 4 k* j'�.-kg tel 621 Sheridan St., Port Townsend,WA 98368 eA15-e. < ���A.:tc- Mon-Thurs 9am-4:30pm,closed from 12-1 Ph: 360-379-4452 Fax: 360-379-4451 dA y) —10 lvlc94.i sellis@co.jefferson.wa.us r http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us 'i1 Ii-e •?7 k 'it b-ea-k c-/, 'Att. p t'1J 49 /- . Z354 ay eor1G'1['? ail4. 1 Joel Peterson From: Joel Peterson Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 4:57 PM To: Simon little (simon@studio-stl.com); 'Bill Staples' Cc: Mary Blain; Carl Smith Subject: Dream City Temporary Occupancy for Greenhouses Simon Little and Bill Stables, Regarding Temporary Occupancy of Dream City Greenhouses: All of the Temporary Occupancy approvals go through Carl Smith, Director. I've discussed your needs with Carl and we worked out a way to can issue a Temporary Occupancy approval for Dream City's Greenhouses D, E and F. It's my understanding that your concerns are with the survival of plantings during the summer, as well as wanting to move forward with state licensing approvals on the greenhouses as soon as possible. Thesearethe conditions of a Temporary Occupancy approval: '�' Permit BLD14-00462 covers Greenhouses D, E and F.All the structures on the permit need to be completed. I understand that.Greenhouse F has not been constructed yet. Inspection Sign-offs for Greenhouses D, E and F need to be complete. There is a note on the permit to verify the setbacks to the 8-foot security fence as shown on the site plan (10 feet). Cal We need to negotiate a specific timeline for Dream City, LLC to comply with the landscape screening conditions of BLD14-O0with the understanding that requirements will be completed in the specified timeframe. We are comfortable.specifying a completion date of September 1, 2015. The landscaping requirement is applicable to each permit, so we encourage you to complete it as soon as it is manageable. I hope this approach will meet your needs. Please let me know what your construction schedule is looking like for these items and how you want to proceed. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson(a?co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW `A SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 1 Joel Peterson From: Simon Little <simon@studio-stl.com> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 3:08 PM To: Joel Peterson Subject: Dream City follow up Joel, I spoke with Bill Staples and he agreed that he'd like to proceed with the temporary final occupancy on the greenhouses with the planting schedule you provided. They may engage that point with you down the road again but at this time they are settled with proceeding as you outlined. Thanks, Simon Little sEidio-stl.com 360.640.8814 PO Box 1786 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Office Address 909 Water Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Joel Peterson From: Mary Blain Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 11:06 AM To: Simon Little; Joel Peterson; Sally Ellis _ c.) u Subject: RE: BLD14-462 I Dream City 5(cJ ,itt,Wen V�9l;tuerrlr,, Simon, I'm waiting on the email detailing the cost of the hydronic system to adjust the fees and a narrative describing the change in the plans,to add the heat tubes. If all of the inspections have been completed for green houses D,E and F,we can do a final inspection and issue the C&O once the fees have been paid. Let me know if you have questions. Mary Blain Plans Examiner I M 1-1'l Dept of Community Development � 621 Sheridan St i� Port Townsend,WA 98368 T-y L1 �r ph: 360-379-4461 fax: 360-379-4451 ` ,j mblain@cojefferson.wa.us l. ,, II at+.f?i (.c rt StArdik., 1s. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mai system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law, including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From:Simon Little [mailto:simon@studio-stl.com] Sent:Tuesday, May 19, 2015 10:58 AM To:Joel Peterson; Mary Blain;Sally Ellis Subject: BLD14-462/Dream City Joel/Mary/ Sally, The Dream City owners have asked if it would be possible to receive a final certificate of occupancy on the greenhouses (BLD14-462) in advance of the other permits. They would like to begin using the Greenhouses as soon as possible and the path to a final on that permit is shorter than the other structures due to the simplistic nature of their use and assembly. Are there any obstacles to pursuing that final in advance of the other permits tied to the project? Thanks, 1 ' Conditions Associated With /q CCEL110:09:49AM Case #: ZON14-00045 \R& / Condition Status / Updated Code Title Hold Changed By Tag Date By 2001 PHASE 1 STORMWATER SITE PLAN None T MET 2/19/2015 IMP A Jefferson County Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Template and Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)Template,Drainage Analysis&Stormwater Findings,and SWPPP/TESC Notes were submitted by Streamline Environmental,dated 10/29/2014. The proponent shall install the stormwater management facilities and implement the Best Management Practices(BMPs)in accordance with the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW)and as specified in the Stormwater Site Plan and associated Construction Documents prepared by Streamline Environmental Silt fence shall be installed per BMP C233 along the down gradient perimeter of development activities Installation of Silt Fence in other locations may be required to prevent sediment from leaving the site All Temporary Erosion&Sedimentation Control measures and protective measures for critical areas and significant trees shall be installed prior to initiating any land disturbing activities Prior to commencing land disturbing activity,the proponent shall request an inspection of the installation ofTemporary Erosion&Sedimentation Control(TESC)measures by Public Works. 2001 INSPECTION BY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT None NOT MET 2/19/2015 JMP In order to ensure that stormwater management facilities are constructed per the approved plans the proponent shall request inspections by the Public Works Department during construction. In order to enable the Department to conduct inspections in a timely manner,the applicant shall notify the Department in a timely manner regarding the project construction schedule Typical Inspections: -Installation of Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Measures(REQUIRED) -Clearing and Grading and road subgrade preparation -Placing roadway gravel base -Placing roadway crushed surfacing top course -Placing improved roadway surface(chip seal or asphalt concrete) -Paved Road Approach -Construction of stormwater management facilities(prior to backfill)(REQUIRED) -Additional inspections may be deemed necessary as project progresses 2001 PHASE 2 STORMWATER CERTIFICATION None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP After construction is complete and prior to DCD project fmal approval,the proponent shall submit a letter to the Public Works Department,from the Engineer of Record(EOR),certifying that the stormwater management facilities have been constructed per the approved plans and specifications. It is the responsibility of the proponent to schedule inspections with the EOR,his designee and/or qualified inspection firm(s), approved by the EOR,to provide for said fmal certification. 2001 OPERATIONS&MAINTENANCE PLAN None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP Prior to final DCD project approval,the proponent shall submit an Operations and Maintenance Plan for the facility that is consistent with the requirements of the SWMMWW to the Public Works Department for review. 2001 SW FACILITY MAINTENANCE None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP AGREEMENT To ensure that the stormwater management facilities are appropriately maintained for the life of the project prior to fmal DCD project approval,the proponent shall be required to enter into a Stormwater Management Facility Maintenance Agreement with Jefferson County. The Public Works Department will send a copy of theAgreement,which has been signed by the Public Works Director,to the proponent. The proponent shall sign the Agreement before a notary,file it with the Jefferson County Auditor and notify Public Works when recorded. 2001 PUBLIC WORKS FEE REQUIREMENT None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP Prior to final DCD project approval,the proponent shall pay all costs related to the Public Works Department's application review,plan review, inspections,and preparation of the Stormwater Management Facility MaintenanceAgreement In the event that fmal approval is denied by Jefferson County or the proposal is not completed,the proponent shall still be responsible for paying the Public Works Department's fee. 2001 LANDSCAPING INSTALLED None NOT MET 2/18/2015 JMP The required landscaping shall be installed prior to project occupancy. 2001 LANDSCAPE SCREENING REQUIRED None NOT MET 2/18/2015 JMP Page 1 of 4 CaseConditions..rpt D/ZW.Lw D CCEL Conditions Associated With 10:09:49AM Case #: ZON14-00045 Condition Status Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date By The landscape screening shall be installed as follows: Landscaping of Interior Lot Lines "Screen-A"landscaping shall be installed as a full-screen visual barrier between the industrial site and residential zones to the west and north of the site This screening shall be fifteen(15)feet in depth. This full-screening shall at a minimum consist of a mix of primarily evegreen trees and shrubs generally interspersed to form a continuous year-round screen that grows to at least eight feet in height within two growing seasons Landscaping Road Frontage: "Screen-B"landscaping shall be installed as a filtered-screen visual separator between the industrial site and the frontage of West Fredericks Street.The screening shall be ten(10)feet in depth. The filtered screening shall at a minimum consist of a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs generally interspersed to create a filtered screen that grows to at least eight feet in height within two growing seasons 2001 SIGN REGULATIONS None NOT MET 2/18/2015 JMP The installation of any sign shall be in conformance with Jeferson County Code 18.30.150. All non-exempt signs shall be subject to review and approval and may require issuance of a sign permit andor a building permit by the administrator according to a Type I permit approval process. 2001 EXTERIOR LIGHTING None NOT MET 2/18/2015 JMP Exterior lighting shall not exceed 30 feet in height from the finished grade Exterior lighting shall be energy-efficient and shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflections are contained within the boundaries of the parcel Exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rightsof-way. No lighting shall blink,flash,or be of unusually high intensity or brightness All lighting fixtures shall be appropriate in scab intensity,and height to the use they are serving. Any.lighting installed in parking areas shall be of direct cutof design so that the source is not visible from adjacent property. 2001 DEVELOPMENT SETBACKS None NOT MET 2/18/2015 JMP Development setback from W.Fredericks Street is 20 feet. Setback from residential parcels on west and north property line is 25 feet. Setback from light industrial parcel on east property line is 10 feet. 2001 MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS SURFACE None NOT MET 2/18/2015 JMP The maximum area of impervious surface coverage shall not exceed55%.The current proposal shows Phase 2 impervious surface coverage to be 54.7%. 2001 PARKING None NOT MET 2/18/2015 JMP Parking shall be designed so that vehicle ingress and egress to W. Fredericks Street(a collector roadway) are headed in a forward motion. 2001 NOISE None NOT MET 2/19/2015 JMP The intensity of sound emitted by any commercial or industrial activity shall not exceed levels established by theWashington State Department of Ecology under Chapter 173-60 WAC,and by Jefferson County under Resolution No.67-85, `Establishment of Environmental Designations for Noise Abatement Areas for Jefferson County' 2001 PROTECT SEPTIC AREAS None NOT MET 2/19/2015 JMP Cut and fill areas must not be in the area of any portion of the septic system or reserve drainfield area as permitted under SEP02-00111. Stormwater systems proposed on the site must meet the required30-foot downslope setback from the septic drainfield and reserve drainfield area. 2001 SOLID WASTE PERMIT None NOT MET 2/19/2015 JMP If greater than 250 cubic yards of inert,demolition,and/or wood waste is used as fill material,a Solid Waste Handling permit may be required(WAC 173-350-990).Check with Department of Ecology,Waste 2 Resources,Julie Robertson(360) 407-6471. 2401 BMPs None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices(BMPs)to control stormwater,erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems 7001 F-PARKING PLAN None NOT MET 2/18/2015 JMP The applicant submitted a parking layout plan on December 11,2014 that conforms to the general parking standards of 18.30.100. 7001 F-LANDSCAPING PLAN None NOT MET 2/18/2015 JMP Page 2 of 4 CaseConditions..rpt DI ZY/LU 1> CCEL/ Conditions Associated With 10:09:49AM Case #: ZON14-00045 Condition Status Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By, Tag Date By The applicant submitted a Landscaping Plan on December 11,2014 that complies with the landscaping/screening requirements of 18.30.130. 7202 F-Confirmed ESAs None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staf on 2/17/15 for the potential presence of Environmentally SensitiveAreas(ESAs)under the provisions of the Unified Development Code(UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspectio9 the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area. 7204 F-Aquifer Recharge Area None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation Aquifers are geologic formations that contain sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jeferson County. 7205 F-Susc.Aquifer Recharge Area None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers 7703 F-DNS Issued None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP Reviewed under the State Environmental PolicyAct(SEPA)by Jefferson County acting as lead agency. Determination of Non-Significance(DNS)issued on February 12,2015. 7754 F-ZONING None NOT MET 2/18/2015 JMP The parcel has been designated as Light Industrial under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 7760 F-General PMT Notice None NOT MET 2/19/2015 JMP Page 3 of 4 CaseConditions..rpt 5/29/2015 , CCEL Conditions Associated With 10:09:49AM Case #: ZON14-00045 Condition Status Updated Code Title Hold Status Changed By Tag Date By NO"I'ICE: This permit does not excuse the proponent from complying with other local state,and federal ordinances, regulations,or statutes applicable to the proposed development,but consistent with RCW 90.58. Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the Jeferson County Unified Development Code If during excavation or development of the site an area of potential archaeological significance is uncovered all activity in the immediate area shall be halted,and the Administrator shall be notified at once. The Federal Endangered Species Act rules to protect threatened Chinook and Summer-run Chum salmon became effective on January 8,2001. Bull trout have been listed as threatened since early 2000. Under the ESA,any person may bring lawsuit against any individual or agency that"takes"listed species(defined as causing harm,harassing,or damaging habitat for the listed species). In addition,the National Marine Fisheries Service can levy penalties. All areas in Jefferson County may potentially be"critical habitat"for a listed species. Development of property along any marine shoreline freshwater shoreline,or floodplains could harm habitat if protective measures are not taken To minimize the potential to damage habitat,all property owners developing adjacent to marine shoreline freshwater shoreline,or floodplains are advised to do the following: -All development activities should avoid unstable slopes wetlands,and forested areas near surface waters -Remove minimal vegetation for site development especially large trees -Allow trees that have fallen into surface waters to remain there -Infiltrate stormwater from buildings and driveways onsite through drywells rather than dischaging directly into surface waters or roadside ditches The Federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act requires landowners within 660 feet(1/8th of a mile)of an eagle nest to consult with the US Fish and Wildlife Service. This Eagle Act prohibits anyone from"taking"bald eagles. This federal law defines the term"take"and describes the possible legal consequences when a"take"occurs. Among other actions,"take" includes a disturbance of bald eagles or their habitat Under federal law a permit may still be required for activities that impact bald eagles or their habitat Contact the US Fish and Wildlife Service(http://www.fws.gov/pacific/eagle/)to learn more about how this law affects your project. Any individual,group,or agency can bring suit for a listed species"taking",even if you are in compliance with Jefferson County development codes. The risk of a lawsuit against you can be reduced by consulting with a professional fisheries habitat biologist,and following the recommendations for site development provided by the biologist For more information, contact the National Marine Fisheries Service in Seattle,or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 8006 F-Property Location None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP The property is located at 192 West Fredericks Street. 8007 F-Surrounding Zones None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP The property to the North and West is zoned Rural Residential 1:5. The property to the East is zoned Light Industrial. The property to the South is zoned Light IndustriaYCommercial. 8009 F-Consistent w Comp Plan None NOT MET 2/17/2015 JMP The proposed use is consistent with the goals,policies,and provisions of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Jefferson County Zoning Ordinance Na 09-0801-94. 8010 F-Permitted Use None NOT MET 2/18/2015 JMP The use applied for is consistent with the permitted uses and activities anticipated within the"Light Industrial zone". Page 4 of 4 CaseConditons_rpt = g = = s x m g g x g g $ s s x s x x l c c N Ny yyy s w to 3 3 S S S gg S 3 S "'1 T m o O n W 6 m D D D a _$ g n w D Q a a' a' p w a o w w w p w k w a S t p = R. p c.g n u.maa6N _ _ gaa 6 v a > > c c a . . a a . . . a s =y 22 tn p E o N A < g p W o m m ' N " s 3 i 3 0 : v a g o g c A m r v m g Cl Dp D K a 'o' ? n x o S 3 v v n 0 n 5 n c w R' a. 0 d ' E 3 m 0 2 'C G c' n �i' ,, w s " g . ^ 0 n n x , m u m flElflTl a a w w ° > > > > o SDDo0 o flIF 'o 0 0 0 0 0 0aN " <4 2, w w w w wa m > ay '32- £a ae_ p1fbo ,n 546ca p .� c c I C In co D DDo D D D D D D n n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 0 0 0 D D D D D D D D D D c co * c O -' 4 . O O gg O O g O m O 4 O 9 O O $ oao + A + n art § g' g'v000ugo' gan' gE'2wvEgm oi h m czoT Q MAN N N N N N Lj N Ng aoooosooaosoogsgg oho o cNN , UN Naaaaa . aU a + aaaaaaa + I.-, A gA - s i 0 0 o N. 01 a' N �" i cn N V V . . . . . . U + u U U . . N N m U [n U y y . . III p p p Q 88888 OAAAAA zSS 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N LLN '- N N '- . . . . t0 T m N '- N N Nyy '- S I rn L L v v 'TD m m m m = a, -. 9 V m ',O r�i m in N. a o g m is ci v ! o z g , �Fgj 0 O Na O a "" ya . S a a .. R.a F? 3 pa."gg z 8 'S o 8 ' am0 .5-. ° a n ?• 2E -1 * WEaa u!i❑ a °R • c .- a c o .. c _ a £. �' ups v .. o Aga 3 a •w o n S'-n 0 q N.� if 5' rt S C = O N R a 1m- m W52' g .''. 67n.-o° '12-2 'w_' a O 5 = .p 0 . 9 glue' z. : .- a = o s 2 .4 a w g C N r b o o m n m y o 3 'm n _n' n *Z" 10 T 8' .... i D c gotba . PA �n [a $ 0 g2 x a -t w w 3 9 n a 0 N o c` 1 w a No 0a E t:G a]. 4 , ^ z + 2 0 o Ti Z fl. in IfIf 3r'nA g 'm2n cF. t N a 0a ^ "' : 8a + o p ii 3 Sf oo.a T < n lilt m o a O y N b p J0 a e s o • o n R o S Fr S R 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -11tQQC' NNNNNZ NZ " L�nNI^ PNNNNN . NN " a; aaaaaaaaaaa 4 a - ggag g3ggg3g � 1 . . 0000000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , , . , , , 04. 0 , . . . . „ + + + + + + + U C 1 Joel Peterson From: Joel Peterson Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 12:49 PM To: Kelli Slater(herbanqi@gmail.com) Cc: Carl Smith; 'Bill Staples' Subject: Dream City Landscape Planning and Temporary Occupancy Attachments: Dream City Landscaping & Fence Layout Plans.pdf; Jefferson County Landscaping Code.pdf; stormwater site plan.pdf Kelli Slater, Horticulture Consultant Dream City, LLC 192 W. Fredericks Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Kelli, I've attached the approved site plans for landscaping,stormwater and fence layout. Also I've attached the landscaping requirements of JCC 18.30.130. This is a short summary of our site visit yesterday to review Jefferson County landscaping requirements and the specific site conditions of Dream City. The goals of the site visit were two-fold: 1. Discuss the application of Jefferson County Code 18.30.130 Landscaping/screening to the specific site conditions of Dream City, in order for you to develop a final landscaping plan and implementation plan. 2. Articulate what initial information Jefferson County needs regarding the landscaping plan and schedule in order to approve Temporary Occupancy permits for the greenhouses on permit BLD14-00462. Goal#2 For item#2,Jefferson County needs to receive a letter proposing a specific timeline for Dream City, LLC to comply with the landscape screening conditions of building permits BLD14-00467, BLD14-00460, BLD14-00461 and BLD14- 00462. Yesterday we discussed a possible timeline of developing the Landscape Plan in July, installation of plant material August through September, and a final completion sign-off by the County on October 2nd. Please propose a schedule that is realistic and achievable. If the landscaping must be delayed beyond the agreed-upon schedule, we may require a performance bond. Also for item #2 above, the Temporary Occupancy permits can be issued for the greenhouses on permit BLD14-00462 only after all County building inspections have been completed for the greenhouses. There are stormwater items that are being addressed through the Jefferson County Public Works Department. Also we need a 3rd-party verification regarding the construction of the greenhouses. Goal#1 For item#1 above,we discussed the conflict inherent in the County-approved site plan and the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board (WSLCB) regulations for security under WAC 314-55-083(3)(a)(iii), requiring a 20-foot surveillance corridor along the exterior of the fence. If there is a solution to this, it will require coordination between the County and WSLCB and Dream City, LLC to arrive at a landscaping plan that meets the performance objectives of local and state regulations. Ultimately, it is the responsibility of Dream City to comply with all regulations. WSLCB 1 I spoke with Officer Susan Anderson of WSLCB and we discussed where we might have discretion with regulations in regard to plantings and surveillance. Your landscaping plan will need to provide a clear surveillance corridor along the fence while at the same time meeting the screening performance results the JCC is requiring. This might be an iterative process with review by both the county and WSLCB. One possible approach to begin with is to see what a 10-foot clear space against the fence would leave for the screening vegetation. Plants You are not required to select native vegetation for the landscaping material, however the following native plants may have good adaptability to the site: kinninnick (Arctostaphylos uva-ursi), salal (Gaultheria shallon), dunegrass (Elymus mollis), coastal strawberry(Fragaria chiloensis), swordfern (Polystichum munitum), Pacific rhododendron (Rhododendron macrophyllum),vine maple (Acer circinatum), and oceanspray(Holodiscus discolor). Thanks. Let me know if you have any questions. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson @co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 2 A 2' a; 89£86VM'0N3SNMO11bOd �� I— g li= 13381S S>10R33031J •M Z66 w w N �.g oaayygge a W r— 1*52 ill i!d '� °83a q v t~- g I U Z " _ SIN3W3AO�IdWI 31IS : 011 `A110 Wb'310li W� Cr) 0 ,2A ?cLLG Fa l p.5- C L R _ 1.g cn a## s°=.I min a � ._boa"i A&n»; O 7 <I) 01 C 2O O vQi 2 Q N N al Ol j m O N fl.C �. '� i^ �O O N m `� w 12 N U N •3 v m•E a a Q O O` N ° N p N •' O ` o _. il a. chi, v P v w C a C 1., p U ° U N C .° a w Q ; "- N 0 O >.- 0 N`c 0 0 C .c ,°i 0 O `p 1�1 °7 O c C U >.0 O)O O v, QU 0 co W U -p 0 0 O � T 6 ^ C4tU a-° lel OUQmO ] O'p _ p O t < Nec • - C ® V+ N�. 0 a a II IIQ z N O0 OcNN ° C+ O p p °i, p 0 '' m_ Q � +_ .i Y s.c ., Z > T .p C ww CSO+ CO)� v, HI N) •Hü Q ^ CY urn Iflil. Q5. ao0SZN ° o3p 3 U � c¢ II 2mo ° w Nt-0 sd m ozii a > 1n N0 Ol nO-° ri _ o= U N Q c J ONIEoo m a ¢ agom °ate - opo ULO } C O }CV ° Q0 ° 8 � 06 ° .. < w. CN C ° Cw a'2i� 4 57 cl) -1�N N' 0Q o - x ,^ w ,n 0NnwvE0 ° � j �wv,1 0111101 r za .EoEaco aEo � � 6o LEa) u w � V —o ° c �a o ° O Q ¢ o ° � � � ¢ � 09 � ¢ 2O CD � a ctio°33S r ° a� • 9 a r "IVI211.5fIQNI.LH9'I'3511 CNb'1 IN39b'I'cv ,L l'89L } 3NI'I JJ.J3dOTJd 4 , >lovel35 cavi.3x15 I _4 aN`d1 3211 o 4 r f-- -- j _--._° _ �� . • —— m o`OS I i ,O'ZE1.\ ..O-be IL w m �4 '\ o O ' -,;� „�NIa�Ine \iz.7 g4aI`° I r 1275891.'6=,ZS1.x„O-,1” %tit 35110HN33?J9 Q3?�3\19N3 32id * �, ii O g ,�N ` p O'Z61. I uoi � �'; :; QWV 0 0 I n' W mFOZ r. 4 LL > • U4tIy>W 41 611 °: Mx a • 6 1i4 9 > v O \O e a'9't Ti;1 S „a„ 9NI4-11119 Hi. A ;,I ry 1AE95 bOSb= ,ZSlx,t7C(E) • z „ `' Cr� I- �v 35ItOHN3T19 Q32133NI9N3 321d r ! z z :':':*:"1. I I � �� �Sy' ::::*1.,„: \4O (\ma,0 61. � Vi O I IZm Q J K 9 s O'Z61. I I� .'' F- ill Z e ::2: Z <. .' IL IL P 3 I,1 _ ,o-os __ �_ nt`4 2 LL a N 9 n. .: N , r N 61 m wi . ,: 1 1 .O.OG GI \ I aYaOr Q 4 `xI O1dJ5 1705'10 =,ZS1.x,1�Z (6) N33219 Q32319N3Q :9 N ~0 m W i > • .ayl °a): LL .�1>W \� c1. 1111 6il I' OZ - z .I Q v �„ �” Kx ;o n m 1 \ f U1 i: o\ . I ':".:::::1 il_ (o I moo--. '`'`�� Ai. ,��piyy €¢� �\�'// \ ffi z z > . • > 9 a Q ,.a V l� �' N '�� Er uI 59.x\ as °'a K I: n I d\,r ti s z 1.0 l z -r , ,,\ I '''.. J i z t2 ° I II '., I �v : ,!..:6; in „a�� m° I .1.-,CC E I I— m_�z ` QOM 9 l�i� � \ oos --_l ...r .• < ° ! 659 % \ i \ : d—• —d— . —d .I > . ; s m \ 1..L 7.-MI 4 ka Q 8 -'dl 3Q15 CC Z " ay 9 IN33a JS 3d'.J54NV7 d .A ° '� 1 LLI i. ....... .1_,...... .-...,4_,,,-..., - < ,,.:,. . .._��...i�r. , '.`.' ..f', I .49'B9L ® 3N1-1.V.213d0?Jd (� Q W LL LD K R' l4'i1N3Q16321 3511 ON`s 1N37b'I'4•d z Z z= z L CL J WWKW Xtx 1(1 0 OF 3 £ 1h • 4 ; 3ad DN •� A lk )2?9.Y11) 1 I Q3, _ 61, N J � :02 141111 g FTA --- SINDWRnnNHwi a i is n11 l.110 Wb'AIa =W Q & . hi41 C th W , O0-J � 1 Oa - NCD 2 '3 mp oO 23 Ci po /u Qr-� W o m4QI � zw / zooc �--wc_ w � wo �Ain LJJn • ' �U L4 r QcO � p " O L--1 w 0 8 O 01 N > C > C -- K 0 AC7 0 .= O 'W Q riuuU ri0 vo "M12LLsnam 1N911'35n aNY1 1N37Y'QY Z EDI ,LL"B9Z ® 3N1-1 A1.213d024d IOQLdA 3415 1—• =am -3Nd7 32114' — — — p — —Q daM DV9135 11 _tit — _f--------------- — - - P R — - L__\_ K f \I, \G\\ I \\\-\ \\\OZEI\\ \\:i• .bET w m 11 �e I 1 O \ „d„9NI41Ifi9 \ 0 F 1 K I li 9 + N 14295 691'6= ,Z6Lx,,0-,1=C 6 . 3910HN332I9 a3213\N19N3-3Ld z m b , I p20. 1\\\ \\\\.'""\\\ 6 4 ifl a I ti gi \g V it IIiE \ II \ 4 1 / Op I pQ I Q 3., 9NIQ 71liH \ g ID 1-'1' } s cs 1d1�S b05'b=,Z6lx,bZ(6) o \N V_" 3V10HN33N9 323NI9N3- d r• 0 Z 2 \ i 'I 9,-x\__I lq i II IM I 1,1::\\\\\`‘ 43.1 .C7C£1. \ I t p tr zui\ W II w 1 ,2-, C so y 1V 116.. I I z9�—blQ—i9 0�� \ ,005L —4 ---\-— ir;K.% O ”CL. 9NIQ 11119 N P \ -140S 4051,_ ,Z61x3bZ(6) I 0 IJ r 35fIOHN33?J9 a3TJ33N19N3 3214 r I\-.iI < < os \zo�wjil'il �)w N = Iii 1 \�L § I :11:11-- )- o ,oLy � , pie N \ i' zo ,stI ` OZ61 I � i J \ o ,oI O \ w ice/ i�;•1Ve , xxl n m/ I I \ �/ i ori► ` / � � �iv . ° � " I 8 \9 Y /4r I �$ �/( § \ZZ T _9Qx m� iI I - g- :19) 1 I ni` - P - d IV \N. y v3,-..s Z 6 V a `\411 \ gyp, '\ I I I z ° g ` t` IV °\ •I L.J. "'Hat- �,` ON .,-7/c/-71,,, d �O'05 _.I •b-�oz . ..temi. `\ N(lsl�8 t� F d — —d— i D L o /a .00 OE®3N1- /a i ....__ ` `M� \ \�:\ p a K di. J,1213dO21d 1 __ .„ -,. _ �� _ _ �222 I .- •t A 3415 M :, a UJ 'co, ILI fi/ 9NIN33215 3dv.CN' ,.d 3d . kL Q Z / _ _ _ — — _,49'BN 9Z ® 3 'i 1.1213.10214 w IL U K/� u tracus321:35(1 4NY1 1N30b1'Q'dLLJ ) F L T LL q ADJACENT LAND�.SE RLS'LE�tllwL m .541 ? _ — — _ PROPERTY LINE b66•' — — z T.Pe-w LANDSCAPE SGRCB+XG SDE, . .—„-_ --1 711 1.•e•am. t w \ _ .., --",..2 '.1 1 ‘‘ 11 to\ , \ Aftutzi. , ,itt.z..4,.... ,‘,. ...„.. I ---1 I I �\\ N n 1 > Hli \ Aj 9' A 1 \ , +\ R D y 40 ii 1 1 e'�: I Cp $ G'`' t:^ a b. I g4 1 \ I1e,- i4 ' �^ Tit -.1 -s,. 6 a -FJ(bW�65,551-GUeG }c C Li, 11 : 111101.061. r ,1� (5.)245(132•9,9043WPT \ • k 1 S eWILpIWs'D" i 66 HU Jill X `BLD\�-462 1rn1 \�--I ill : i \\ ‘<\\\'' I- —"-- — al (p. \ ; 1 1n. \ II § g•Vg ; )24'91'57.911 '64'447 SALM&W' .904 52FT 16 II '; \-41 i \ 1 r 11 1 - ilIl q iss LI; I 4 \ \y `'y nee-eHSM\\o b�eo«acme 5 11 I , \ - -04I92.a,tao 9aPT M6 P 11 '' \., \\' \\-saa\\\\\\\, 111 – – s=--_' ti . 1.4 — J Lylp y4. nu LANE4 4Gl YARD lt1MLR �'.PROPERTY LINE•200.IT �Z ACWWT LAID We 116X1"M[T6TRML _ p 8 z 1- 6o m$ SSQ z I5i AlA . dm 3 it ' t:4046it z C17 fill a n t 0 $ 9 MI 111> X g z i I DREAM CITY, LL : biIL IMI-'KvvcMENTS 1 6 n Iia N �► N ^ I�r1 O�"' It or STREAMLINE ENVIRONMENTAL 715 Grant Street • Port Townsend,Washington 98368 Phone(360)821-9960 • www.streamlineenv.com July 10,2015 Mr. Eric Kuzma Architect/Engineer Jefferson County Department of Public Works 623 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Re: Dream City Stormwater Systems Installation,Engineer's Certification Dream City LLC 192 W. Fredericks Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Tax Parcel Number 948601301 BLD 14-462 Dear Mr.Kuzma, Please accept this letter as verification from me that stormwater facilities installed at the referenced property have been constructed as specified, or with slight modifications completed with my approval and under my supervision. I, Everett Sorensen, the undersigned, personally inspected and approved the installed stormwater systems, constructed according to revised plans prepared by me,and submitted to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development(DCD)on March 2,2015, and approved by DCD March 17, 2015. Sincerely, Streamline Environmental, Inc. Everett A. Sorensen, P.E. Principal Engineer (360) 821-9960 everett@streamlineenv.com Attachment: Stormwater Facilities Operations&Maintenance Plan (1 page) Copies to: Mr. Joel Peterson, DCD(JPeterson@co jefferson.wa.us) Mr. Marc Hilt, Dream City LLC (marc@marchilt.com) Mr. Simon Little, studioSTL(simon@studio-stl.com) WPM S e tutli s 7 6 kat,s pprt- k.--bkr ,ae4z,i& brtrkitt- g_et rvelir ciedr coriA ,A f7 a n Qe1)at t,Z rt{- l akiA Cvr SWv-er(1 0Ace, 1,7c, cLe-,4' S-te Can 0 cI iS C J z11 (co,- C.:2,41/D *VT c -crIc , � 4 AIME Dr-ecivyn 6-77 ioc.J q18 coi .3n1 . ' . `• 81L. fire j 1��G► z- loti459ricc( > ick, oco s-P Ick 2°,OCO .5,00'1177 Q,aoc c eat+( /0" —`'j�AQr 1 4ew6' -(07 2 S. 1stCOrfiggc4 ' (��.. _ _" 5 ��= Vic, °ie 1.39-9041 :s>(' 72,9- a? S; `rqz M'cl,9vs-4 1 Tr) q6;(3_0 y�- 9 %a -27-10.0 Nollrgyl St ff* &L ;ctgn1 Confiaai/V L/ t c / 1 • D Ao c. w-ick VI f2S c mors, i nS1Ne. '1r� VS/Val . rin Cr,ILAND USE AND RURAL L I ny r II - )- LI c L T /C, effit IA 10,11A GLEN COVE I 111110 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONE (LI) LIGHT INDUSTRIAUCOMMERCIAL ZONE (LI/C) ,�� : ��_� 0ri�M��i. 'p IIiI =L;;;IiA t Imo lilaceliirl..E®__lltrai H IMMUNE= I rtui-ii—m� rNit ,A/ G ' '" ''..ppriliAll pip! im111 it amo ,� � � la iiii 111 flail : M I� �, �® ��mIIi !lIi r rtJ SII► - / ►I IIS •• • L r Mill ■ 11111 BAY VIE' 1•. 1111 :II IMI 1111.■ -„ I_ i_ mai III'- I'11'lllllllllllllll' .,4,4,!. . . '111111.11 IIIIIII■IIII„ .,- Ise- 111111■ ■' ��f 7 Ii1iutexii ii*,� NEI m ®� �� Y- 3res m � MIN X1 l lig 5. ° 2 1 ,, 4MIMI'■ i® $a r'" i`. 1 111 + '0" ,11111. 11111. 1111111 1� 11 � 'tkt tom. ®�'»h n4MF�7. i " 't 1F Ill"'cE `.144i. 53 .T 11111 0.fg04 iF i*'.;-* Wt':: w4� efY r 4 sr 4711"7-g w b Pr 'A»M mi :dl ,4 4rF4h moi. F"� F .;T, ... .. v'Y,y . t _ ,,! i{ f ,, 'r 'i MI rr r ill N 0 500 1,000 Feet A I I I I I February 26,2003 Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 3-36 UPDATED BY ORDINANCE#17-1213-114 18.30.130 Landscaping/screening. (1)Application. Landscaping or screening shall be provided for all multifamily residential, commercial and industrial land uses, small-scale recreational and tourist uses, and as required in other sections of this code, except that landscaping will not be required of industrial uses within the resource-based industrial district when the development is sufficiently screened from public view. (2) General Provisions. (a) Existing trees,vegetative plantings, undisturbed open space,and/or topographic or natural features which meet or exceed these standards shall be considered to fulfill the landscaping or screening requirements of this section and any other applicable reference to these screening requirements in other sections of this code. (b)The administrator may authorize variations to the landscaping/screening requirements of this section to: (i) Provide consideration of topography, natural features, existing native vegetation and soils on the site and site location in relation to adjacent and surrounding uses; (ii)Allow alternative plant mixes or berming that accomplish the purposes of the type of landscape screening required; (iii)Conserve water through the concept of xeriscaping; (iv) Provide flexibility in the size of initial plantings; and (v) Ensure that any nonresidential use,structure or activity when proposed in a rural residential (RR) district shall be compatible with that of existing and anticipated future uses in the district. (3) Landscape Screening.The three types of landscaping screens are described and applied as follows. (a) "Screen-A" landscaping: (i) Is a "full screen" that functions as a visual barrier. This landscaping is typically found between residential and nonresidential areas; (ii)Shall at a minimum consist of: (A)A mix of primarily evergreen trees and shrubs generally interspersed to form a continuous year- round screen that grows to at least eight feet in height within two growing seasons. (b) "Screen-B" landscaping: (i) Is a "filtered screen" that functions as a visual separator.This landscaping is typically found between commercial and industrial uses; between differing types of residential development; and to screen industrial uses from the road; (ii)Shall at a minimum consist of: (A)A mix of evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs generally interspersed to create a filtered screen that grows to at least eight feet in height within two growing seasons. (c) "Screen-C" landscaping: (i) Is a "see-through screen"that functions as a partial visual separator to soften the appearance of parking areas and building elevations.This landscaping is typically found along road frontage or between multiple-family developments; (ii)Shall at a minimum consist of: (A)A mix of evergreen and deciduous trees or shrubs generally interspersed to create a continuous canopy. (4) Landscaping Road Frontages.The average width or depth of perimeter landscaping along road frontages and required locations on private property shall be provided as follows: (a)Ten feet of Screen-B landscaping shall be provided for an industrial development. (b)Ten feet of Screen-B landscaping shall be provided for all above-ground utility facilities or development, excluding distribution and transmission corridors, located outside a public right-of way. (c)Ten feet of Screen-C landscaping shall be provided for all commercial or multiple-family residential development. (5) Landscaping of Interior Lot Lines.The average width or depth of perimeter landscaping along interior lot lines shall be provided as follows: (a) Fifteen feet of Screen-A landscaping shall be included in all commercial, industrial, or small-scale recreational and tourist development along any portion adjacent to a residential use or district, except as may be varied by the administrator under subsection (2)(b)of this section. (b) Ten feet of Screen-B landscaping shall be included in all multiple-family development along any portion adjacent to a single-family residential use and in an industrial development along any portion adjacent to a nonindustrial development, except as provided in subsection (5)(a) of this section. (6) Landscaping for Parking Lots. Landscaping shall be provided for commercial, industrial, small-scale recreational and tourist uses, and multifamily residential use surface parking lots, with five or more parking stalls,as follows: (a)Screening shall be provided on each side, front, and/or rear of a parking lot where such side, front, and/or rear abuts any residential use or district,except that no screening is required where the elevation of the parking area lot line is four feet higher than the finished elevation of the parking area surface. (b) Parking lot screening and landscaping shall be kept in good condition and shall meet the following conditions: (i) It shall be continuous where required along a side,front or rear of a parking area and shall not be less than four feet in height above the grade of the parking lot surface, broken only for accessways and aisles; provided, that the screening shall not be permitted for a distance of 20 feet on each side of a parking area accessway to ensure proper sight distance. Where screening is prohibited by the above provisions, low lying shrubs or other similar plantings shall be placed; such plantings shall not be allowed to exceed three feet in height. (ii)Screening shall not be installed in such a manner as to obstruct the free use of any fire hydrant. (iii)The space between the landscaping screen and the right-of-way,except for any pedestrian access improvements, shall be landscaped with grass, shrubs,trees, or evergreen groundcover. On the sides and rear of parking areas not facing a street, such landscaping shall be required between screening and the lot line. (7) Landscape Plan.When screening is required, a landscaping plan shall be submitted with the project application to indicate how the minimum screening requirements are met.The plan must meet the following requirements: (a)The landscape plan shall be drawn on the same base map as the development plans or on a separate sheet properly labeled and shall identify the following: (i)Total landscape area; (ii) Landscape materials, plant names, and applicable size; (iii) Property lines; (iv) Impervious surfaces; (v) Existing or proposed structures,fences, and retaining walls; and (vi) Natural features or vegetation left in natural state. (b)The required landscaping shall be installed prior to project occupancy. owever, a certificate of occupancy may be issued prior to installation of the required landscaping if a bond or other form of appropriate surety is posted in a manner acceptable to the administrator.The time limit for compliance may be extended to allow installation of such required landscaping during the next planting season. ( )0 aintenance. (a)All landscaping and necessary support systems shall be maintained for the life of the project. (b)All landscape materials shall be pruned and trimmed as necessary to maintain a healthy growing condition. (c) Landscape areas shall be kept free of trash. rd. - 1 Joel Peterson From: Joel Peterson Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 10:10 AM To: Kelli Slater(herbangi@gmail.com) Subject: Dream City Landscape Plan Approval Hello Kelli, I hope all is well with you. I'm just checking in to see how your landscaping site plan is coming along. Community Development still needs to approve your landscaping plan--we put a stamp of approval on the site plan to make it official. Thanks. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson Aco.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW `rA SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 1 Dream City LLC PO Box 1909 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Mr. Joel Peterson Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 August 3, 2015 Dear Mr. Peterson, This letter is to inform you that effective immediately, Lissa Staples will be replacing Marc Hilt as the applicant for all current and open permits held by your offices. Simon Little continues to represent us as he has in the past. Thank you for your attention to this matter. i<VJszaq,...LL2) • Lissa Staples, Member, Dream City LLC 1 R ECEOVEr AUG - 32015 i______ j )1 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY OFUFLOPMEN 1 61 I I - 52o- 4-o-b -- 2345" p Ci2_* Joel Peterson From: ev_sorensen@hotmail.com on behalf of Everett A. Sorensen <everett@streamlineenv.com> Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 10:41 AM To: Eric Kuzma; Joel Peterson Cc: Elizabeth Williams; Simon Little; marc@marchilt.com; Dominic Morrison; Wendy Davis; Bill Staples Subject: MLA14-90 Revised Stormwater Management Plans Attachments: 192 W Fredericks Steet Stormwater Site Plans, Revisions Mar 2, 2015.pdf Hello Eric and Joel, This morning I submitted to both of you, stamped & signed hard copies of the attached Revised Stormwater Plans for Dream City LLC, 192 W. Fredericks. Per previous discussions with Eric, the main revisions include: • Removal of proposed rain gardens along the southern boundary, • Approximate locations of 30 proposed downspouts and two Type I catch basins, • Proposed grading of driveway and parking area to direct run-off to an existing vegetated swath west of the existing building, • Modifications and expansions to the proposed below-slab infiltration beds, two of which are now proposed for both large greenhouses, and • Construction details of the proposed below-slab infiltration beds. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Everett Everett A. Sorensen, P.E. Streamline Environmental, Inc. 1821 Sahlman Drive, Suite B; Tampa, FL 33605 715 Grant Street; Port Townsend, WA 98368-2405 360-821-9960 1 mod U) s_m L (n U CO ^ 0 3. -0 U 0 ,a) J O Cfl 0 O) o�� N c) a3 r_-. J ) CO s_ CO 0o U N- �� 0_ N U fn O ea O .- .8 t 0 U) U E 00 Cl) LS•) O C 01- 3- 0- N —� �0/� +. U 0 ¢ 00 C - tn. t✓ L 5 r 0 —239' a) ca a) _ L / a E _ O2W a) in ro 1 o rna �i m m¢ i2 j- 1 L -I Q CU • c =co c f �� r o c 3 rn Z Z C�i N Proposed 132'x24'Greenhouse 3 0_ O N Impervious Area=3,168 SF N L.+ N F- co a) 0 3 0 Minimum of Two 6"Roof Downspouts 03 N N 0 L N aa)c .fin CAW 5 m r 0 CU CO 0c� ✓-1 v o a m = d CL a)'- o I Proposed 132'x72'Greenhouse 2 0 6 m q 3 m m m »� o ' o Impervious Area=9,504 SF Po'°� b 11 °o U d N o° > - , ' Six 6"Roof Downspouts o rn T, af2i o 0 0 O 0 a 01 I N m o Q ° N .L as +� 0 W Ni I ■�Nuvi � �`° W N // N ma '6) > E , -0 0 CO t o r/) / o r�i 3 �i c r o) C N N "`� I 3NV=� w o c0 a- F- - CO �0 i„ t(r oc r-L; o U c a �7 a) a) r c¢ I D -ccy '; �-0 In V- '0 I a)T o �t I- U I 1i , 0 Q \o LL 200ft _ .:, , , I ; ■ @E QLLN y0 t 0 , I a = n5 5 , 1 o- 11: Proposed 32'x72 Greenhouse 1 a a)o a) ~ `a o Q a o _ Q I. g Impervious Area=9,504 SF o H�` o)@ •�o 3 XO s / I .N Six 6"Roof Downspouts 2 o . 0 t-- m 0- - �' fn Il CLUE 11 0 0 c Q N " a . Ln.- m o a Q . w� .- r s I 1 IQs ��o moo Q — o w o I • _ o mU x o .y N 13N I I dL ---(Al-0 rNco,' -. =, /5 O IZ� C I -1 Oem N / N..�z•� 0 N-(6 - -o_oE UL L rn Co El 2ce - I 1O= m a' a0-E ~ U X@ N N O 0 I - 7%slope WaO> �o) a � , U r meets oo E - \ - tS 3a~ICO '32.0 A- —I, Q) @ co N • ONW co NN '0d - 4110 m0 I c >, \ rLC� 'QNB � � L 0 c u) -;�co E c 0 a' CO LL_ O— yi'_ I co Na) a) a,_ . a) x `-' ♦ .y r0 in 8 2 W l I J x '33 C C N 22(i)'- a (13 A o0 ', .Ln IX .fA f eb d a N 1 - I. I -X S & --- I-- ITS - CON I Wm �� ° O Mo 8 0. c, I I 1 n Iwo m - °' 0 M __ I sffip _ )'1`A it I ' I C C LI! " 30' -- -/--7 a E n\ ,�� _""� )' iL y _ �- CSW a M Q 2a, �!!IG 1°° a __~� ` -.77.---, _____ ___ C - �j C �i C7' I __ c - c E E ` _ '~� c _ 0 S O U _ , I- > N -209 L o a)in _ _ — c m \ L Tsp_ ,_ d - Q E `o a)o r 0 1 a)-0 a) a)I (0 Q ro C co N O a c N c>< i6 `° ?)i 4- mS)a o z a) 3 0— aoi `' 0 -EL o. 0 ,...6 21?) 3n o CO 0C aa)) > cm c w' w �' C " Z a� N CO a Qm >o)c @Dad N a U.0 ,X a) Ly m +,q; @)-0 a: a -8(7) � N.>m rn v � •D W� 3 ,0 w oUI... a) 2o c -m � c V m iuLr) m m 0� 3 a o )7 a ❑m Oin r= ai)ice a0Q �p> 11.1 �, Existing Drained Impervious Surface Areas Area Square Ft Comments Existing Building 2,592 Currently dispersed along buiding perimeters Existing Driveway 4,400 Currently dispersed along perimeters Existing Total Impervious Area: 6,992 Parcel Area: 84,593 Existing Impervious Coverage: 8% Proposed New Drained Impervious Surface Areas Area Square Ft Comments Existing Building 2,592 Dispersed along building perimeter Revised Pervious Driveway & Parking Lot 7,200 Gravel, semi-pervious pavers or porous concrete Proposed Buildings A& B 14,000 16 Downspouts tight-inged via 4" PVC to catch basins, tight-lined to below-slab infiltration beds Three Proposed Greenhouses 22,638 14 to 16 downspouts tight-linged to southern catch basins or norhtern infiltration trenches Proposed Total Impervious Area: 46,430 Parcel Area: 84,593 Proposed Total Impervious Coverage: 54.9% Proposed New Building Roof Areas: 36,638 Prescribed Downspout Flow Infiltration 2 200 60 SF of infiltration trench or bed area per 1,000 SF Surface: of drained surface *Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington,2012; Design Criteria for Infiltration Trenches,pages 3-5 through 3-7(PDF pages 441-443;60 SF of infiltration trench or 90 cubic ft of drywell per 1,000 SF of drained surface, for medium sands. Prepared by: Everett A.Sorensen, P.E. Impervious Surface Inventory Streamline Environmental, Inc. Dream City LLC 715 Grant Street;Port Townsend,WA 98368-2405 everett©streamlineenv.com;360-821-9960 192 W. Fredericks Street Revised February 24,2015 Port Townsend, WA 98368 ST REnaJefferson County Parcel Number ENVIFlONME AL 948601301 Drainage Analysis and Stormwater Findings Dream City LLC 192 W. Fredericks Street; Port Townsend, WA 98368 Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 Parcel Area 84,953 SF (1.9 acres) Surface Gradient The site is very gently sloped, with the overall gradient downhill to the central northern area of the parcel, at slopes varying from 3 to 6%. Vegetation Undeveloped portions of the site are fully vegetated with mature plants, shrubs and trees. Soil Types Soils are generally sandy and appear to be very well-drained. The soil evaluation reported in the 2001 septic system design indicates generally highly-permeable sandy soils, with evidence of historical prolonged saturation at depths varying from 4 to 7 ft below ground surface. A soil test boring conducted by Streamline Environmental, Inc., on September 13, 2014, indicated medium-grained sands to at least 4 ft below ground surface. Surface Waters/Surface Flows No indications of surface flow were observed on the site or in the immediate vicinity. Downstream Analysis The ground surface generally slopes toward properties to the north of the subject parcel. The greater vicinity slopes generally to the northeast and east No DNR streams are reported within 4,000 ft of the subject parcel. While no indications of stormwater surface flow were observed at the site, there is a drainage gully to the north of the site, centrally-located, that appears to convey stormwater flow during peak flow conditions. However, no indications of erosion or channeling were observed in this gully. Existing Development includes a 2,592 SF building and an approximately 4,400 SF gravel driveway. Existing Stormwater Management Facilities No enhanced stormwater management facilities currently exist. Proposed Development includes constructing a 12'x116' emergency access drive at the east end of the parcel, constructing two 7,000 SF buildings and constructing three greenhouses totaling approximately 23,000 SF. Stormwater Management Strategy Full on-site infiltration of stormwater should be feasible. Proposed Downspout Flow Infiltration Downspout flow from the two proposed 7,000 SF buildings, each equipped with at least 8 roof downspouts, would flow to Type I Catch Basins, in turn plumbed to the two proposed below-slab infiltration beds, as shown on the Revised Site Plan with Proposed Stormwater Management Facilities. Seven or eight southern downspouts from the proposed three Greenhouses would be tight-lined to the Type 1 Catch Basins, also shown. Seven or eight northern Greenhouse downspouts would be tight-lined to the proposed infiltration trenches along the northern boundary, also as shown. These infiltration units are sized as prescribed in Ecology's Stormwater Manual, Section 3.1.1 Downspout Full Infiltration Systems(BMP T5.10A), in the Design Criteria Subsection. All three infiltration units would be equipped with emergency overflows leading to the natural site overflow at the north boundary. Proposed Vegetated Swale for Parking Lot& Driveway Run-Off The proposed expanded parking area and existing driveway shall be graded at 1% to direct run-off south and west (as shown on Site Plan), toward the existing vegetated area west of the existing building. This vegetated area already has a slight slope to the north. Slight grading adjustments to this area, completed during grading activities according to conditions encountered, shall be completed in order to prevent off-site flow from this vegetated area westward (toward neighboring parcel), and eastward (toward the existing building). At least 70 ft of vegetated path will provide natural filtration and treatment of stormwater as it soaks into the ground. Prepared by: Everett A.Sorensen, P.E. Stormwater Findings and Streamline Environmental, Inc. Recommendations 715 Grant Street;Port Townsend,WA 98 36 8-24 05 everett@streamlineenv.com 360-821-9960 Dream City LLC March 2,2015STREAMLIN 192 W. Fredericks Street I� Port Townsend, WA 98368 ENVIRONMENTALJefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 15 mil PVC vapor barrier 2" Extruded Polystyrene Insulation Reinforced Concrete Slab Class C Non-woven Filter Fabric ° ° see e veva ° r , From Catch al ocr Basin To Emergency Overflow Influent Pipeline Coarse Drain Rock erforated Sched 40 PVC (or equivalent thick-walled pipe) Undisturbed 1.5 to 3"Sorted&Washed Trench Native Soil Infiltration Bed Cross-Section >1 t Side View and End View Q >2' Not-To-Scale Infiltration Bed Suggested Installation Sequence: 1. Prepare level surface to bear slab of greenhouse (excavate to native, or fill with suitable material to 90% compaction). 2. Excavate horizontal infiltration bed volume (8 ft wide by>_2 ft deep by 100 ft long) in the center of greenhouse footprint Excavate trenches at both ends of infiltration bed, to depths of about 12 inches ABOVE bed bottom to accommodate influent and effluent piping. Influent trench shall slope at least 1% toward infiltration bed. Effluent trench shall slope 1% from infiltration bed. 3. Line excavation with a Class C geotextile filter fabric, or equivalent, taking care to avoid punctures and void spaces. 4. Place washed 1%"to 3"drain rock to depth of at least 12". 5. Install 6" schedule 40 PVC non-perforated pipe from upstream catch basin to infiltration bed, transitioned to 100 ft of 6" schedule 40 PVC perforated pipe on drain rock in bed, transitioned to non-perforated 4" schedule 40 PVC pipeline to system overflow. 6. Cover perforated pipe in infiltration bed with drain rock to match grade surrounding bed. 7. Cover influent and effluent piping with coarse sand. 8. Cover entire infiltration bed with Class C Non-woven Geotextile filter fabric, or equivalent. 9. Lay insulation such as 2" extruded polystyrene board. 10. Cover insulation with 15 mil PVC liner(vapor barrier). 11. Prepare to pour slab (install re-bar, radiant heating tubing, etc.). Cross-Sections of Proposed Greenhouse Drawn by: Everett A. Sorensen, P.E. Below-Slab Stormwater Infiltration Beds Streamline Environmental, Inc. 715 Grant Street Dream City LLC Port Townsend, WA 98368 192 W. Fredericks Street everett@streamlineenv.com 360-821-9960 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Revised February 24, 2015 84,953 SF (1 .95 acres) Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 SEP02-111 ZON14-45 MLA14-90 •WAC 314-55-083: What are the security requirements for a marijuana licensee? Page 1 of 3 WAC 314-55-083 Agency filings affecting this section What are the security requirements for a marijuana licensee? The security requirements for a marijuana licensee are as follows: (1) Display of identification badge. All employees on the licensed premises shall be required to hold and properly display an identification badge issued by the licensed employer at all times while on the licensed premises. All nonemployee visitors to the licensed premises, other than retail store customers, shall be required to hold and properly display an identification badge issued by the licensee at all times while on the licensed premises. A log must be kept and maintained showing the full name of each visitor entering the licensed premises, badge number issued, the time of arrival, time of departure, and the purpose of the visit. All log records must be maintained on the licensed premises for a period of three years and are subject to inspection by any liquor control board employee or law enforcement officer, and must be copied and provided to the liquor control board or law enforcement officer upon request. (2)Alarm systems.At a minimum, each licensed premises must have a security alarm system on all perimeter entry points and perimeter windows. Motion detectors, pressure switches, duress, panic, and hold-up alarms may also be utilized. (3) Surveillance system. At a minimum, a licensed premises must have a complete video surveillance system with minimum camera resolution of 640 x 470 pixels or pixel equivalent for analog. The surveillance system storage device and/or the cameras must be internet protocol (IP) compatible. All cameras must be fixed and placement shall allow for the clear and certain identification of any person and activities in controlled areas of the licensed premises. All entrances and exits to an indoor facility shall be recorded from both indoor and outdoor, or ingress and egress vantage points. All cameras must record continuously twenty-four hours per day and at a minimum of ten frames per second. The surveillance system storage device must be secured on the licensed premises in a lockbox, cabinet, closet, or secured in another manner to protect from employee tampering or criminal theft. All surveillance recordings must be kept for a minimum of forty-five days on the licensee's recording device. All videos are subject to inspection by any liquor control board employee or law enforcement officer, and must be copied and provided to the liquor control board or law enforcement officer upon request. All recorded images must clearly and accurately display the time and date. Time is to be measured in accordance with the U.S. National Institute Standards and Technology standards. (a) Controlled areas include: (i) Any area within an indoor, greenhouse or outdoor room or area where marijuana is grown, or marijuana or marijuana waste is being moved within, processed, stored, or destroyed. Rooms or areas where marijuana or marijuana waste is never present are not considered control areas and do not require camera coverage. (ii)All point-of-sale (POS) areas. (iii) Twenty feet of the exterior of the perimeter of all required fencing and gates enclosing an outdoor grow operation. Any gate or other entry point that is part of the required enclosure for an outdoor growing operation must be lighted in low-light conditions. A motion detection lighting system may be employed to light the gate area in low-light conditions. (iv)Any room or area storing a surveillance system storage device. (b)All marijuana, marijuana concentrates, or marijuana-infused products that are intended to be removed or transported between two licensed premises shall be staged in an area known as the "quarantine" location for a minimum of twenty-four hours. Transport manifest with product information and weights must be affixed to the product. At no time during the quarantine period can the product be handled or moved under any circumstances and is subject to auditing by the liquor control board or designees. (4) Traceability: To prevent diversion and to promote public safety, marijuana licensees must track marijuana from seed to sale. Licensees must provide the required information on a system specified by the board. All costs related to the reporting requirements are borne by the licensee. Marijuana seedlings, clones, plants, lots of usable marijuana or trim, leaves, and other plant matter, batches of extracts, marijuana-infused products, samples, and marijuana waste must be traceable from production http://app.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=314-55-083 7/24/2015 WAC 314-55-083: What are the security requirements for a marijuana licensee? Page 2 of 3 through processing, and finally into the retail environment including being able to identify which lot was used as base material to create each batch of extracts or infused products. The following information is required and must be kept completely up-to-date in a system specified by the board: (a) Key notification of"events," such as when a plant enters the system (moved from the seedling or clone area to the vegetation production area at a young age); (b) When plants are to be partially or fully harvested or destroyed; (c) When a lot or batch of marijuana, marijuana extract, marijuana concentrates, marijuana-infused product, or marijuana waste is to be destroyed; (d) When usable marijuana, marijuana concentrates, or marijuana-infused products are transported; (e)Any theft of usable marijuana, marijuana seedlings, clones, plants, trim or other plant material, extract, infused product, seed, plant tissue or other item containing marijuana; (f) There is a seventy-two hour mandatory waiting period after the notification described in this subsection is given before any plant may be destroyed, a lot or batch of marijuana, marijuana extract, marijuana-infused product, or marijuana waste may be destroyed; (g) There is a twenty-four hour mandatory waiting period after the notification described in this subsection to allow for inspection before marijuana plants, seeds, plant tissue cultures, or lots of marijuana are transported from a producer to another producer or to a processor; (h) There is a twenty-four hour mandatory waiting period after the notification described in this subsection to allow for inspection before usable marijuana, marijuana concentrates, or marijuana- infused products are transported from a processor to another processor or to a retailer; (i) Prior to reaching eight inches in height or width, each marijuana plant must be tagged and tracked individually, which typically should happened when a plant is moved from the seed germination or clone area to the vegetation production area; (j)A complete inventory of all marijuana, seeds, plant tissue, seedlings, clones, all plants, lots of usable marijuana or trim, leaves, and other plant matter, batches of extract, marijuana concentrates, marijuana-infused products, and marijuana waste; (k)All point of sale records; (I) Marijuana excise tax records; (m) All samples sent to an independent testing lab, any sample of unused portion of a sample returned to a licensee, and the quality assurance test results; (n)All free samples provided to another licensee for purposes of negotiating a sale; (o)All samples used for testing for quality by the producer or processor; (p) Samples containing usable marijuana provided to retailers; (q) Samples provided to the board or their designee for quality assurance compliance checks; and (r) Other information specified by the board. (5) Start-up inventory for marijuana producers. Within fifteen days of starting production operations a producer must have all nonflowering marijuana plants physically on the licensed premises. The producer must, within twenty-four hours, record each marijuana plant that enters the facility in the traceability system during this fifteen day time frame. No flowering marijuana plants may be brought into the facility during this fifteen day time frame. After this fifteen day time frame expires, a producer may only start plants from seed or create clones from a marijuana plant located physically on their licensed premises, or purchase marijuana seeds, clones, or plants from another licensed producer. (6) Samples. Free samples of usable marijuana may be provided by producers or processors, or used for product quality testing, as set forth in this section. (a) Samples are limited to two grams and a producer may not provide any one licensed processor more than four grams of usable marijuana per month free of charge for the purpose of negotiating a sale. The producer must record the amount of each sample and the processor receiving the sample in the traceability system. The outgoing sample must be clearly labeled as a sample to negotiate a sale and recorded on a transport manifest. The receiving licensee must receive the sample in the traceability system prior to sampling. (b) Samples are limited to two grams and a processor may not provide any one licensed retailer more than four grams of usable marijuana per month free of charge for the purpose of negotiating a sale. The processor must record the amount of each sample and the retailer receiving the sample in the traceability system. The outgoing sample must be clearly labeled as a sample to negotiate a sale and http://app.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=314-55-083 7/24/2015 . WAC 314-55-083: What are the security requirements for a marijuana licensee? Page 3 of 3 recorded on a transport manifest. The receiving licensee must receive the sample in the traceability system prior to sampling. (c) Samples are limited to two units and a processor may not provide any one licensed retailer more than six ounces of marijuana infused in solid form per month free of charge for the purpose of negotiating a sale. The processor must record the amount of each sample and the retailer receiving the sample in the traceability system. The outgoing sample must be clearly labeled as a sample to negotiate a sale and recorded on a transport manifest. The receiving licensee must receive the sample in the traceability system prior to sampling. (d) Samples are limited to two units and a processor may not provide any one licensed retailer more than twenty-four ounces of marijuana-infused liquid per month free of charge for the purpose of negotiating a sale. The processor must record the amount of each sample and the retailer receiving the sample in the traceability system. The outgoing sample must be clearly labeled as a sample to negotiate a sale and recorded on a transport manifest. The receiving licensee must receive the sample in the traceability system prior to sampling. (e) Samples are limited to one-half gram and a processor may not provide any one licensed retailer more than one gram of marijuana-infused extract meant for inhalation per month free of charge for the purpose of negotiating a sale. The processor must record the amount of each sample and the retailer receiving the sample in the traceability system. The outgoing sample must be clearly labeled as a sample to negotiate a sale and recorded on a transport manifest. The receiving licensee must receive the sample in the traceability system prior to sampling. (f) Producers may sample one gram of usable marijuana per strain, per month for quality sampling. Sampling for quality may not take place at a licensed premises. Only the producer or employees of the licensee may sample the usable marijuana for quality. The producer must record the amount of each sample and the employee(s) conducting the sampling in the traceability system. (g) Processors may sample one unit, per batch of a new edible marijuana-infused product to be offered for sale on the market. Sampling for quality may not take place at a licensed premises. Only the processor or employees of the licensee may sample the edible marijuana-infused product. The processor must record the amount of each sample and the employee(s) conducting the sampling in the traceability system. (h) Processors may sample up to one quarter gram, per batch of a new marijuana-infused extract for inhalation to be offered for sale on the market. Sampling for quality may not take place at a licensed premises. Only the processor or employee(s) of the licensee may sample the marijuana-infused extract for inhalation. The processor must record the amount of each sample and the employee(s) conducting the sampling in the traceability system. (i) The limits described in subsection (6) of this section do not apply to the usable marijuana in sample jars that may be provided to retailers described in WAC 314-55-105(8). (j) Retailers may not provide free samples to customers. [Statutory Authority: RCW 69.50.342 and 69.50.345. WSR 15-11-107, § 314-55-083, filed 5/20/15, effective 6/20/15; WSR 14-07-116, § 314-55-083, filed 3/19/14, effective 4/19/14. Statutory Authority: RCW 69.50.325, 69.50.331, 69.50.342, 69.50.345. WSR 13-21-104, § 314-55-083, filed 10/21/13, effective 11/21/13.] http://app.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=314-55-083 7/24/2015 Loop 16111.;:z1. 1 — i .. ,. Asti -------7 4 , 2R ii 0 i 0 I rt ill 0 .• , . • f 0 ill 11111 1 7:11 ..- ki.' ., -... -, '`'. . ... ,.: , , paw i 1 _ ti 0 g 0 U I fi _ i g , ri Er• ,,- -- . ). ,..1 . . .,:.. —Loui.,se _...., 1-. .-, 0 "-:-.7.---- 0 0 P .., ,.: II g - g -. _.4. . ...-- '.1 ce ..., .. . „ .....ct :1 , : 9 ,. , :„. .........„... ......, ...... ..... 0 t......, . , --C. . ,. i : 0 , :- A---, r li 1, h ,...,..„ I : - § LA3 - ., 7 i :7. '- i El 4- C,4;" 411 ii .-... -----7 ono fit NMI I g i .», N Otto st 1 1 II [ .• 0. 7-` . . , 5. Ln I I - ,.., .,. ,. . .... _ ,..1 - >; h ADJR(2Nf LINO VW m :RE4RNR�L.. XiA b �PROPERTY Lid m 26064 IL > \ �a69' in ill„ .., —I I I• 11'224' I � . `,'\ '�' If I m s N 2......• lONi I is --,,i/ Z y, I .' ' ... . litill .., 11 71 I g ' •2 A'\$ CIS �� �= rn I A ,\: ., , Ik", _ c73 I im � T fig:; --- - - 11. � 11 ti h Illik‘ I z° EN61N ea , ` ,ex C£ (� I �.Y 0 (3JILPIN 33'.q�g4 3QFT ,1111 6 I i' �I 0 --i ,.1 ' 4 4. -`-MP•8. Nk I 1 ! 4 r., M I i i 4 i ,-, 1;1111111 • 3)24)1133'=9.304$QFT j ,,, -1 '-:, • I I i i .44.1‘1.6 . , 1, . 01 BVIL.DIh16"E' ��� a,§ �� id I r .4, ;, \ � aIaI '' PIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIk' i ob °Q j U i �' S FIRE LANE V _ 00E rNRv seTE.cF 4 • PROPERTY UnE 6I � ._ al NJ,•,PNT LAND LSE:LKMf IV0.51RIN. •i�i ° OW o4apou n,^-0 oa>� >.� c,"• - 9C `° 0 q S O 'oz m '$�'"Q �< 9ffI �rC �F"� � • � 9 0r3! 2�. flm i-° - f>e aR3 ;Z. is 2�• m zDC, n n ' s..�.. ra Z 4; �om >� m8O.Rn 11e' od1i �. £c32 $S Z a> 5 "d; ^-3 g-.o R F,° � g ` i x x ii b n"_n r18 b Q ,y `'" 5. goyo • °'C ..,t--51 .3[1 ° • "m g „ : . ,: ° c V °O in .3[V� f p 0 N 2-55§ Q as Q m z `L( N 1L, pq DREAM CITY.LLC : SITE IMPROVEMENTS E1II IIII C L, y t" i m i 192 W.FREDERICKS STREET } II 'Af,, Q PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 i 3 vv 18.20.170(4)(o)for cottage industry, an additional growing structure(s) such as greenhouses may be allowed up to the size limits per parcel size and structure size for producing only per subsection (4)(a)(i)of this section. (d) Processing and retail in the agricultural zoning district is allowed as conditional discretionary (C(d)) and shall be subject to the standards in JCC 18.20.030(3), agricultural performance standards, and this section, recreational marijuana performance standards. (e) No recreational marijuana operation may be permitted as a home business.All recreational marijuana activities are subject to the applicable requirements of Chapters 18.20 and 18.30 JCC. (f)Outdoor Producing.All outdoor producing activities in rural residential and forest zones shall have an unlimited outdoor canopy without size limitations.All outdoor producing activities for a cottage industry shall have an unlimited outdoor canopy without size limitations. (g) Landscape Screening.All recreational marijuana activities shall have Type"A"landscape screening from adjacent parcels,per JCC 18.30.130,development standards. (h) Setbacks.All recreational marijuana structures and activities in agriculture,commercial forest, rural forest, rural commercial or rural residential zone that abut residential zoned land shall be a minimum 25 feet setback from all property lines including front road setbacks. Setback requirements for other zone combinations are as stated in JCC 18.30.050, development standards, Table 6-1, Density, Dimension and Open Space Standards. In the event of conflict,the more restrictive measures shall apply. (i) Cameras.Any security cameras proposed for a recreational marijuana facility shall be positioned so as to not intrude on the privacy of adjacent parcels. (j)Any fence eight feet or taller shall be located a minimum 25 feet from all parcel property lines. (k) Recreational marijuana activities and facilities shall comply with all applicable standards of JCC Title 18 including but not limited to development standards in Chapter 18.30 JCC, performance and use-specific standards in Chapter 18.20 JCC including JCC 18.20.010, General provisions,JCC 18.20.020,Accessory uses and structures,JCC 18.20.030,Agricultural activities and accessory uses,JCC 18.20.140, Commercial uses—Standards for site districts. Prohibited in convenience crossroads (CC),visitor-oriented commercial (VOC), urban public, urban residential, county waste management essential public facility(CWMEPF)and mineral resource lands (MRL), parks, preserves and recreation (PPR)and Port Ludlow master plan resort zoning districts. (4)The following standards shall apply for all recreational marijuana activities: (a) Producing in the forest resource lands and rural residential zones is allowed as a conditional discretionary(C(d)) use subject to the recreational marijuana standards and structure size limitation: (i) Permanent and temporary growing structures on rural residential lands RR 1:5, RR 1:10 and RR 1:20 and forest resource lands shall meet the following standards in addition to all other applicable sections of the Jefferson County Code. (A) Rural Residential 1:5—Temporary or Permanent Growing Structure Size.The allowed structure size is a total combination of square footage of gross floor area for all growing structures. (I) Five percent of gross parcel size in square feet, up to a maximum 10,890 square feet gross floor area. (B) Rural Residential 1:10 and 1:20 and forest resource lands CF-80, RF-40, IF— Temporary or Permanent Growing Structure Size. The allowed structure size is a total combination of square footage of gross floor area for all growing structures. (I) Five percent of gross parcel size in square feet, up to a maximum of 21,780 square feet gross floor area. (b) Producing in agricultural zoning district is allowed as a"yes use"without size limitations but shall be subject to the standards in JCC 18.20.030, agricultural performance standards, and this subsection (4), recreational marijuana performance standards. (c) Processing in the forest and rural residential zoning districts is allowed subject to a conditional discretionary(C(d)) use permit per JCC 18.20.170,cottage industry standards,and as consistent with this section, recreational marijuana. In addition to the maximum structure size of 5,000 square feet for a processing structure authorized as a cottage industry per JCC (d)"Marijuana-infused products"means products that contain marijuana or marijuana extracts and are intended for human use.The term"marijuana-infused products"does not include useable marijuana. (e)"Marijuana retailer"means a person licensed by the State Liquor Control Board to sell useable marijuana and marijuana-infused products in a retail outlet. (f)"Plant canopy"means the square footage dedicated to live plant production,such as maintaining mother plants, propagating plants from seed to plant tissue,clones,vegetative or flowering area. Plant canopy does not include areas such as space used for the storage of fertilizers, pesticides,or other products,quarantine,office space,etc. (3)Use Zones.Three categories of recreational marijuana activities are recognized by rules of the state of Washington as follows:"production,""processing"and"retailing";and each category of such use shall be allowed in the following comprehensive plan zones and as further shown in JCC 18.15.040.Table 3-1, and JCC 18.18.040,Table 3A-1: (a) Production.Allowed as a yes use in agricultural zoning district, rural industrial and urban industrial zoning districts.Allowed as a conditional discretionary(C(d))use in rural residential zoning districts and forest resource zoning districts. Prohibited in rural commercial, urban commercial, urban public, urban residential, county waste management essential public facility (CWMEPF)and mineral resource lands(MRL),parks,preserves and recreation(PPR)and Port Ludlow master plan resort zoning districts. (b) Processing.Allowed as yes use in rural industrial and urban industrial zoning districts. Allowed as a conditional discretionary(C(d))use on agricultural resource lands.Allowed as conditional discretionary(C(d))with a cottage industry permit in forest resource lands and rural residential zoning districts. Prohibited in rural commercial zoning districts, urban commercial, urban public, urban residential,county waste management essential public facility(CWMEPF) and mineral resource lands(MRL), parks, preserves and recreation(PPR) and Port Ludlow master plan resort zoning districts. (c) Retailing.Allowed as a yes use in neighborhood/visitor(NC),general crossroads(GC), rural village center(RVC), urban commercial (UC) and urban industrial (ULI)zoning districts.Allowed as a conditional discretionary(C(d)) use on agricultural resource lands.Allowed as conditional discretionary(C(d))with a cottage industry permit in forest resource and rural residential zoning 18.20.295 Recreational marijuana/cannabis. (1)General Provisions. In addition to all other applicable development standards of this chapter and other applicable regulations within Jefferson County Code,the standards set forth below shall apply to all recreational marijuana activities in the unincorporated areas of Jefferson County. In the event of conflicts,the more restrictive measure shall apply. In addition to these provisions, recreational marijuana activities shall comply with all applicable provisions of state law(Chapter 314-55 WAC), including the rules governing recreational marijuana as promulgated by the Washington State Liquor Control Board and other agencies with jurisdiction. (2) Definitions. For purposes of this chapter,the following definitions shall apply.Where these definitions conflict with RCW 69.50.101,as now or hereafter amended,those in state law shall govern. (a)"Marijuana"or"marihuana"means all parts of the plant Cannabis,whether growing or not, with a THC concentration greater than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis;the seeds thereof;the resin extracted from any part of the plant;and every compound, manufacture,salt,derivative, mixture, or preparation of the plant, its seeds or resin.The term does not include the mature stalks of the plant,fiber produced from the stalks,oil or cake made from the seeds of the plant, any other compound, manufacture, salt,derivative, mixture, or preparation of the mature stalks (except the resin extracted therefrom),fiber,oil,or cake, or the sterilized seed of the plant which is incapable of germination. (b)"Marijuana processor"means a person licensed by the State Liquor Control Board to process marijuana into useable marijuana and marijuana-infused products, package and label useable marijuana and marijuana-infused products for sale in retail outlets, and sell useable marijuana and marijuana-infused products at wholesale to marijuana retailers. Marijuana processing for the purpose of this section may or may not include drying,trimming and bagging of a recreational marijuana product. (c) "Marijuana producer"means a person licensed by the State Liquor Control Board to produce and sell marijuana at wholesale to marijuana processors and other marijuana producers. Marijuana producing for the purpose of this section shall include drying,trimming and bagging of a recreational marijuana product when done in conjunction with producing. Joel Peterson From: Kelli Slater<herbanqi@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 10:20 AM To: Joel Peterson Subject: Question Hi Joel, I wanted to check in on the plans and see if we've been given the okay.Also, is there anyway to put in for an extension of our Oct 2nd due date? Please don't jump through any hoops,just thought Id ask. I have had several personal issues consume me, one being my health. I just thought Id check and see what the chances were of moving it out a month? Thanks Joel:) Kelli Sent from my iPhone 1 ._ — — v ; 1 �1 i C1 1 I s - 1 1 rd") 1 Vry WI 0 1 - 1 8 i i ei i., ,_ o t i12 Q_ 1 li 0 I j. i •1 16 1 tg O 0 1 I . ........O... el if 1 ® ; . I : s Q . cel +x 1 33 b g 0 k ..=.) In i 4 ''' I ,1 OkiN C Lf 1 e O- z f 6 a! / 1 s a ni 1 4i tv " a , , 8-s Eg ,o t l^J r i � , V I. ii U .1 ^ y D ' j.� dN i ;12 � El-. . ‘.7 a 1 , ,,,: .-,! n , on , 00nc) onoo oc c) nonnoa :i 31 � asxvz o. • re ° : Q I tl 071 1 D tl tl I I 1 '6' 0 I 1 ® I IO e I ` i V z 1 4 1 I I _ : s _ 1 D i y 1 P- i O 1 3I i1 I S U� 2 2 O 14. ( \v G ® , 1 1 o- os U`1 0d11 a- Al • \ G� tl i�J '� i ri v) i Az1. o a t 0 : °� is- �� �; IHo Y- 1 I It � j� n I V I A.k! L r,1 1`4 112I ar I c,47...w'l.‘ hM - si � o —wasxo--,--a - < room�t _ 0 s. w re--------____,- • v.:, , 8 t . .. .. .. , . , _ k., 8.... I, , .... II _ ) 4 . . c i 'i 8 )g I,0 .,... , $1 0 i ' , § 6 0 - § , 1 . ‘I'l 6 --..",-.......„, 11 '.. i 0 (:2 7--1 i • in t i g r' I: , . 0 t4 :z. g ,......... ,•, ,... , ,.6:z 1101 .1, IT 0 El 1 .id. g r I 10 I Ail 10i I ry tiy - sI M 0 0 a 8 10,.. 0 0 . ' i,...,„ t„,.... 0 11 I) 0 cl l s — a g , i . :-.. I) 00 raa .t+,,. m x F 4 y 4.. * ' a L PT,Ygs M 01 rg .. it a I 2142 , , ti h tt TM `. tr { 4i t i ,k ,,.,..:,,,,,,.,:.-l.'.':'.11„„ .„.,','.-'•''':'''1••:-:•:;•••, •-•••• ,..: 5: „ .:!,.„1,4.4. :.''''.*:-1.'4.1.1.!.:,''.g. rU 7.• a' t, ?...41 :;k54:5,;••••4•,-•.:',••'.•!"- .'''.'..',..::4,.,„...,:-.....„„..,.'...,,-„,-n x ti"�9 • m+ Alloy ; • •5s d'e .:01-•!-) •••••„, ,' ' a- a a , igt z; � ^ ix. � ag "` '.' '5441, s x >suexc .., 1:..„....40,..i„:.,:,04.„.r.,,,„ .„:„...,.._...to.,„,:ititz,.,:,.:5„,,,3,...,.....,,,.....„ ...„,e,,.....„ ,....1.,..44].„. .. .. ,,...,,i,,i,.:.„,.,, _ ,...4„: ,:::::41:i,..,,,..141,.,„.:.:,.....,!;:t.„ .„. .•.,.t ..„. .. fig; 1k i an a: ••%& g .,..„,„,„,c,„. ..... , ..,. , : ,.. :.... _ ,10:i•es.!,.:•.,.4••":5•417:•--.. -- • . 4 ..:. �s .i 4...- < ^ .xv .>. i? x��., es ' ry 5 - pp W ,�.fid•�: ntwr Vit..w y a i .. mss , .. - ,. , tt ri .t. ,.,......,, , . i ^t '''''''/i,.•,„ l' k .kmst!'rtt•eit' tt'''''," ' • ,t „ ' t'+'' ttj-,',trtZ' . ' 'it • :ktt ' '3 -ttt 1 1.1 ''''t'2' '' l' r ' ,, +it., t. f,•,,, . . ,4 , , -e' A ..:,, ,.A1111,,,t-tt,t,...iii,t'vt.,--„.. t; ' ,*,..A. - ,I. !.' 1 .4' w - — ' ', ..m..,`,..i,..'4, ..,..L 4 '...- °.•='':';'' ,:-.',- 10===-1-v-=°''-. •5'''zi..41" ' . ' = X ' ' =. ''' .1 ' It.." = 1.,, ,.,..,'1,,,'-'^,,• .,.de..,- ithf ,4,0110t,—I. 1 " ea. ...,, , k...-- .0- .-, ,, -' ,,,' ',41,11,,..5. ,-..'r. fr. .., , . , ,i.... " • ,,'‘i ' ''.-' i f' ,' , ,. a i Ni -'- '-'' -.$-,k ',. .1,--t4yt, '.-. 01, ,, ,,'11°.=714„ 1' ! ' . '.111 '' '44t!.,:',4"-'z' .'''YZIZ4,1if.or...4'it4iiielii .... ,. ' ...-4, li - , ._ - . ,., tt t , , -. t -,-*, 1,11- e It:7', 1 , .., ,... ,. .. - W. ,. ... - t -, Ilk , p.• , t , ' , . ) 0. , * ., j ..1. - oR q y..: . m . . .r .. ..• , � .�- �. ..1` .. .� _ x x p „i s e I { r ' �,, � . ' - . 't 1.4 irr ,,,,.:too,,‘,.. a ,l . § l : P. . �y . � '. yy ':•'.,,'','••''':'•':t•- , j e • • *,,y` .. 3 e.AR� € w fi„x. y° a wais � of ' ; a;, r : i .: x . Mg +5"i 4 "}* �.�s - a ;i ..& d $ ':s a i. " 0ya • ? 1 ...:, . ,,:_:::,.; ....,..„._-:... ..,..,......,„..::::,.:, _,---- '.:g,„. :•!!*•'• • : -- 4 ..illti" .� ' MSM+ ' * .. ... 1. a _14 < & y y%' •r x b _ i est ,rid'' • 1 F" ani • . sa xY g%a riqic' n.'r' p yrA "4 ',% y Ryt y. _ 9�3 . �:� : • • 4ff:: 4 � uis ,- � 6 yMa 4k 1. .,...,...... e_, " . •• «' °f �a 'w g � 5& s: #,w '�+t a` a. :,., 1,,,,,,. „,„,,r.k.„:„:„,„,,,,,:„..-,„,...,—..:-.,/,‘ --T ,...: rf4':'::•:.*41474.3,71‘,",::E• -:3-,•:'iL:.:::•!.:•••33:-:-t:X.7.it.V4ALikt.re.i3,7•,#:•,:t:14,443-lii•LA3,•4: t i. - ,,3 w� :•:%:•,••• •-•-:.":•••::;,!`-'7.:*:-, yrs `5"' Z: ve x ^fie ,f,-, ..i.::.*,,,,,,I.,,,,, 4.. .yr �� iso , ,: k 4 * , � "'msz. ti _,a3 4x rc r b Bim' ' rt ,a&-gyp.•&•. •,,yµ�' ` '. tm� kR �' m * AT t. .r 9 � " C4 s r s1„ y „„y'a s""a ,;� : ,:•� 3.a .� F F ; yt � •{,p' • 4 � � ^�� : �!, fin: a +�•, . a� �9 t� '�T sr � ' ., I1) „4,. ,a�. i� .' g a+r G.: -',4i47 .e a ..mom • \ lit, ;�-;.4•••••••..i'°'•:1:'' r 4:1- s1� s`- : •- dY „; -p. r P • t Y •• ,�w , x„x ice:- xi r ..., . , . ..,. ,, , .:,,. .,",•„.,.. •... ;....:... . .. . ,..g.,,..,..„: .., .., ... • -.1 ,: : :.,;.:. • Y A�' 4{4h xe "$z`M ... .,.., "'" -frt.,. ,-.•••....„."• ....,. •:•.:'.` ....:...•:,..,:io.:.,f.,,*•:"`, ..,'.:75,41:....„.,,,.i.,,,Sf. •It &° tu aw �; "Yyx ID 3e� EY t. n it"tY �' <. 3 bs iW. t Y NIM iq '" ""�d`#, ., £>} k_. • aY.¢ fa it• 4aF'''$ -li.„..,;.„.7....;.': • .... .. 31d s ,: € M"4J � a ... tlabw • yiu.' q' ..., . ........ . .004.11.4:4i•-:-.:- ..icoolekv:ii:la.,44. -- ,,,,...!:'..., ,,:.. f..... - ...A. p „..,.....,....„....,.,:..... . 4� R „1` Yw •.„,,., ...•,:„,,.,,,.,,„,.:., .,� xx t;�•�•:d IlhilitatanDlgtkAtiliMU zN �.<c x • has E t � v ' $ 4 j ,rdF 01....‘:.'!' + p"a v $ '!` 'k' A � b .f Jul" ���� lij1,11T' S�'�r a. { , '..''''-',,:-':=1.17,:c.'-'','+rtee fik ,, t '.4, -0,,:: ...,.... gi*,t, st , ''-r-'''.-4:' OilLiiitiliiMitiiittalikeldiiii4gKo'"- f ''a .,eK sixt^ iu �i�� # t 4 4 . ' ' '•`}'' E..t »;"�+'•r'�:r".: ±.:..''""' ' '1E s# s'.• F ' 4 •; .r ,. ::ti,'SlwzRi1»#, .,.. ,t"„h`.a'..."r••••••••''..sw"». t1qY� ; fir% +r• • r�f%zz. _. " ! " :•"'"i;,4›..,,1 4#=,=',.• " S $ "r ,' zz,z: r[ •i. ,^ Y• +t•, tks"r Z- i•tr♦'MiY•f1�: :. , Axz z#: : W' ,$,y "1 � ..teti«ia « 4x,. .y i , • • • ..=*•,.....- r: r; ,Y } #,'�r . r^ . xx.r"x�.�» , k. Sµ" rF " Fj 1.e"i.� A� 'F' < x"»”»yr'y: :':;� •x•.?EYt" " zw ': ..;jr'r�4+"krx �.sY 'w >A^fak«• 1 .. -'T, t • •x ,. .:zz.".•.,i•�.r ''" :y",,_'§ti,'"'r < �'r k'� ' . :+^x•,•;• :Y.,:fr'. rx:.>"..'.:.+k N.A$' . i t •• �x«:•zzzzzz ,: Rz;s.5. ::. _ • •"Tir'.• ' ''. ` ♦ l" ii i>i"i"i>>x W .e, " e. f r ,kir r i r�.FFai'i'iwASi ._ " mo% z•*kf"ftY>k# 1 4 • " : ,F" . •« -f.rr« f>«>rSz FY 'Istt n_ 's « " .-x` r #* ip.••• i R {t«« , "Azir,zrr" � ~ IA ft, titn'.♦•I z �T".*#.z "I . 4.'�R"- rlrr•i ds '0ir43 yi "., t: »» :: °•'`C,:�! f7r"'.•'�. �� � N,' :'r!{2�ft.•,1i !1`^:i� , maysem. : .y t • • • • :r ,,w; as'* >,7 .' ` f"t: <A ,• ;*.;.&• y1" L. '� " 17!'-lf7: • y.sa" :s .", '.i:« rilr t•tr^ 1-,„t, .y xyt.•""' isN'."i"' >»<.,S�- xr > i r ., x .,;x.'3e •kf"Y{xSrg• : '.'• s� . rvi , d. , 1r '; . • • •� ' �' •• 'zs 't ra. A • E ttYwaa.n.�w.r , :A: • • - •�4'.'':.: <,�. xx-'Y [ rv: 1�. '_ • A.., t^` . :..♦.Yy^.. '�'✓YimiSY.y.'.,.'r,.. �),',x:4K0•.:•'..' A ." . . ^t!,. . � C xk ' . wc^ • • `T "Sei c^ a< •nyr.rr .Y ";rnR .•it. tty ♦"t * E :' ?I.ua'r....*.q.:1"., ' •.w �l«F ` cy. I:N . •a j ♦ • fu»Tyyi3Y �oYY♦•fnw1" f + .•yiR RSy 444 " ''',,','*it:',.'.. aiwsy" xwL ' �! • a' eµ'• Alrtw.Yra7,' \ �♦ N °• •••'" . *r" •S • r f , . + � „''M�' aA�Y: ,ri YAriY- ' 1 % a 1i':Fai•"' '' t,v *ti ".•4 i aL r' •i,zz .. . ,r4 A:. ErriyyS`- " L 'fib ' r ✓' >' .. *. *' F� 4y: :-> 2r IC '.£1E' �E x,,h % af4*RA ."•••25:•45Nf 3 l�� . :h ♦. • ' ii ' sz.#' , . rS:'.'' rF`,a:,. 4, ;;> I`:> . f"Y. «x #,,y �'`i••rb��Tr�it"-'f + „ rfr .ri M' ,Ty**A*4x,tA .>SrYYy1"'^a• . 50444 .� 2'lrS " •: .Tb yy ' '":4 ' YC z,."."",v♦�t!,� „,,,,:„:„:,..,.,*;k:,..-.,„3. ” ,,, v4✓, :: ' ' ,,,k I'«y.z'k✓'•z:,u"•" `, ,.'z,r s.[ % • ";#z fFC. -t --..*N11-4,,,: . .. , • ' • t : ..,7 ,• N '� r• '».S". ,...,-,...,:t4:'4 :,.,4,-;z:‘,..: " .a .:1, .-..),,,A 455*5 a ' F� 5.445445*� 4:*Ak Y .t•r f' %.• � w' as»y .: x •• ,i,.s e° �R:V ` .:3 ?v. :< 1'w "> t& 5� * 4"4•& . •• • T • ` ' a .t3y.". .S.A :)\r1' 'Y .x..' " • }? 44% : 'Efw ,•,: a x" . .J:. ♦.T .':i; ri . z ' • ?:i< x .f00A4y " s. °>r '"3r "•"."5.24..AYk♦ .52!.45if ,4"5.+.54. rSarr * • CM,'. 1`4-k ". ? ` r "'�: pii l'ii .,„r.„t. '4•♦e'„:iiuF. ' : x S: # ,; _ • ((+k .. ,• •fi F»., r R^ r rrfrh(' " [ t'. •E } < a�f,"f.f»E`rf *>t � w s1` • N ,.f s...i . , ri • *. ; , ' ,.ir,, . w "1`'•.:,, , • a,'='" +-, i�J y' �i1,'t,'f :d':rb :f• t z!'Su x. .,r•; "k«: .1`;j: '` ,. y l y.Y ° ", F,: t [.-4rk � �Vw:•X?2'� l(iIf �, 4. �';t' Lr{ . 41`1 �4�� .0",,•,4., . 0..." • ,:*44 .• . * 2 ;, • ..* All' "t • 4- t. I . ' 4* I , •-• • **:i: ,.' •IA ..***,*1",0''0.4:4''4•A'"' 4111 . it , 4,, , ,,,,,4,4-4•,,,,f, :7(,re.',, 4::`, i .. .P.• , • • . +.°4 IN >• 1. • t too-*At,••.. • 410.•*‘‘!",,.4 •.#,=, .+” . •=14 ...,44 r ' ti I.", .' . .4•1•41:4 • eit , 1 it. 4,^',..... .•'''. ''. ,,,,,,. , , <• s'• * • , . „,. •••:^44: ' ' * t • • «,. • , , t• «•..‘ , „ , •... ..1 r'.,- i' *V :-,',=<17)4,• ' .4." 1 - • #...' , ,, -. 144'•=*4410'7 . •,,, 44. • .'* ; -''.'•.*` ' ".***' ' ,..i,**:).. If rr j .. •• r't,. • • ' i . II • ' ...g ',..;r•:•'• • , • ••*•*••• •• , • ' • : ' •1 -4 1 0,$ 4.,. ),_.. .. . „ t•$ '. ..«• .$ '4* • • .• •• 4""''''''''''•I '•i.' :..*:.. .4' . 4i#•,..'0,',.. -4.0..„x* i fi " '44 °10.4*° , „ „"kt'l • '011110'.4 00' 1',' 147r:.14,,%°: 0100°4* •••"*. ... " , * ,,, • . .. 0, ' ic>i, •""•4,',..s.";.*.„.'0.•'• ' „.004,* •''' . 00s 0, .# , 0 *4 • •'• ='' . #'''•*#,,-*-.'.,d•‘,1 ,,,, ,,, '`, ' , .•• ' , 0 . . '„ i ' ".•'.1".4...',..***.,•44_1,- 4441: ' ''< 4 ,, ,^ '• , '. '4 ''*-"' -**** 1`;•'.4..: *'*•":4<##7,04e"t*.r.r.....:"40' . '*SP,i''' • . . , , • • •• ' '• ' .. ,,,, •"••• .:.. ' ,,,,,"<,.'4. «. * ';°" *. •''"' <r•"••••0 ,'••;`,..*014,;*4* -"‘eg: •' ,.9., , 44.0° 4`.4,: t:4.14tit41, ,14 , ,,,. „ . ,. . . . r , , ,.,,,,,li,„...,,,,41: 41.010,, ,4==,,, ,,"?=,, 4 t 11C" 4"Act, 0...1....., •, iv,.A;•* ,-•' <- .• < **•• -",*t, , - ,0:-..-.:4,-,,,.4.;• .;'',,,,•, ••,..,1� 4*--e-474',X.77,0- ''ir,1,,,-"-- *•** *4* 4,,,,* I, - ,,, • - . + •+•••••••'‘,'''''''' •• •'•„4:4*,4* , .•.* 4,04 ''• -t',4`1- ' t-,"=." .,, -** f "Wilii*-': "rir'A•i i' • !":4',V4-050/... ' i i : ::, ' i*. ::*'.** •: * . ' ::*":*t 4:**f:*#* .`..‘4141:41=1:"e:S=A44:";"'. •'•*$::* 1 '.'`' I'Ylit'-',i)'"e•`-ti,''''', .'!.•4:'"n-t - ,,, `' - ' 4i ,•,''.** ''• ' ,t p, 4 =*•:-.',t.,-,,,#;#,:: **• • "- ..',„,',4**.;,' --- 'IN; - ' t•,. _' ' *-,: •"•#.•, ' ,,,,,,,,, ; - „1„,•••.1 ,,,•,;:•=1'•• •-•' ',--•'„"7:•';', - "..-...'1.! .„,,.•,,, t,,,,,:*i.:.=,,t, ,, i 1..4' ' . • ' V' ilk ' : - k A. ,,.,•••*. ' 4 ,4,.' .° , #, •• •. ..', .e".'",'„"<<;•:',"44."4:"1.<! f,' ,N. .r-* °„,,e,',J ,.•,#•, , : ',"°,„,,L,,' 0.#,;',.:. .5',..„,#4,0‘; 1•41,,. - , 10641 , ,iq . #•" "., .,,, $4g,IN dg,$1'',:irg•-• A,,,,f; “ -,--, ,,,,,.4, .#64.,.frit,-:. e •.' . ,, ,, Ot .*,,,, , -1,.•tg, —t .,;* , 41,4444y •,-• 4 , *4R*ilA;iO4$:„ 4, *,#iiii:, ' . .• 4, /"4 r i^ •'' * '••0°. '1 ;<., .,',#:..*4,•,#',„';„..r,,:,0«.,, e ' , ,##." -=0:, •= • = W44.4,'; •,,lie;- .4' I.,". ,, : illf ' , * . ' . • „,,;', 1 ^ ', 4At ' .,,at 4'411,11 ‘scs;1...1-41C.:. ,' : .t,, 4:4 "... . 7.7. .., . . ,. 1,.., .... .i , .....7„...,,....m..„....,.„.. :,.„..,% ;. . .., „—#,<,.:%#,".••2„%*4-'t,,,,^,.,<=,,,, ,,%;'.,..,...,_„,,t.,•,.:„c,,..,.•i..„i 1.- , ... ,,=..-;##t„4,,i0.*'- .',#,•:*”,..• '. •. . :.,,,;* .„..„,.,,.. .-..,•,„e.^.." ,,4i.s..7*1•. ....- ; . . ,• . * -.+ 44*, - ' ''* -,- t<7.,,‘,* ' <•' it " . -, •-•,. -,4*, ,>.t t.',,"-"', -,t, "."•„,, "" _ ...,4 - 4 )1:* --"-a,;., 4r....It.. f.:4-1.."1-. 4.-.4.4-:-,100, ...K,.... .,.,,,, .--. . ',5..,..,,,, ;. .:' , -_,,..4.'4'4 • •••4' ' 1 • .,, t 1..... • •• $' . • • # %, „.' • , '-• • '..•itong$1••"'••••:•.«,. t$4- • . • ...4 t g6•#•• 4''• r'' rgr • •t•gr"•t*••4t • ' \' 4 $ • .1. , .„ ..47$#.:•*. *14,44.,, • .4 4: 4',*.,:,,- : •' . -',,. ...,t - ' ,• . ., , ," ,-„ ., . • , '•"if:,;.... ,,,,,,,-1,7„„ •. ,. , • ,,,,. < , ' t• ,, t•'74''',;4.,S, .*:.• , "`•, ,,. „: •,e,-.,"*. •:.=,•,*,:t4,... = .'.' :: :•• '• Sej•:;,'-A,-*• * N ,i,,,'•V :'4 **'4 A ,,,,,f• , /,',,,I• • • ,n41.44, ' „,.=. ., • ., e*, . ..: .*•,•'. ,,,,..; '1, -•„,,, #- ,+,4,,' ,s„,,7f*- .'., 4.*".. „. ,„, , • . • #, ***4:*#'.:*t•'*. '*riNkio .-,,,,...,..„ ...,.....•,.. $.-......„- . ",.........,,, „,..#4--,,;/sf.g.1.,:**)•14 ,..,,,,x ...* . • •*, •.• , -',,, - #, , t . • # • ,,, tr•' ' •• 41.4.4 „•'' '*'• •P,A101/0441160** * # •* •# : -4 - :1,,,,'" -', - -, 'X* 4' rg• '. ••4 j4 44 • t« *,#. • ' 4 •, • • «, •' ' „„xt .....# it• • l'*•••,$A.g'.**IP,g•;- vt$, ., • i ' VIA******4.6011M11. « ift t. ' 1 „ •••••.4: , A „. • fe • •• • " ..*:',A.• 4.* .. ,:* :4 *• ' ftV t4 ,*/**.• ,: •#••#•j • 4. ••'•*'\ '• . • *-4 •'1*••''' i -• 4+At., . - .. . - r' , '' # ,.; ,7;"-. .1 ##:**' •'' 1 ' 1" '+'#e *.. I# 4:**. 11' * • #F ' **** *V.* ***• .* , , . . 414.*•, ,•1; i .4.** f ' ** , . * #V' 4 • r • ' •• ' ' •,' A:4:1•,•' '.;,**, .11414:1 ,,, ,, • ::::„:*:" • '4'`.:1***Vitt ff,"4- '. • :A: ', :. ,1..,'#. '.: .fr•**''' ' . ' F *, 44% ,,. . 'f ., ' ,,, • .2,, . ..,.•,,,, :--t--P• . . *j ,.. t- '-• . . • - •-• ..tefitit4 : ' * . - , ••,='' •'4,..H., ,-,..•- . -i, • , ,'•11-tr,,,,,,t ' : - , • --" .0'14.'4,7.44' *.,,,,,,, 4 " • . .ati r a'''*? " :,* • , - ft; . - •• . - . .=• ' ' * . , 4i #.,. .#•.#* ***•**. #. . II' *...* + **. *4 . # # +: po':...:.1.,..._ •, ;.•44.,.......:: I 9 .&.• - --- ------------ ... ••••••. ...,........ .: .. m...._ „...,:..,:„....„:.:,..:.,.,,.-:,......:,-„:„•:._ . ....... .. ..., 4010.11-06c:.7. --. 1 , .•".....:.,0,. ....10,.......•.„,,,,,,,. . •••„,_ .: . .:::.,.:.:,,,,:.,,,,:,.,„„,,,„,.:,....... ........„.:.•......_...ii, _.,,..,,, .....„••••. ,,.....„::,.....,.......... ..;,...,..r,.:...: „.: .........,;,..,..,,.,c::::,....,•:...,.:,,....„...,..•...„.,,,,.:... , ..” .,...400!..41001,1407....... . . .,,,gior,_ ...,,. . . .. ... .... . . ... .. . 7„,.,,..,..,:,.„,...„...,...E.:,...............: ...............,m...:,.,.........000...: .. .. ..,.„_•::.4,,,,, 1 .,... .. . .. . . .. , - :_ ... '• , - ittir.,.;_:.:-.-,..-.„..,..,..-.:_:", „,,,, .. ..•••., ,,,,. • .,, - ara •:... :. - .1.41,1.„:„,;:t5, .... .. •-:,:•:--.,-•-•,•. . ... .._,•,,,,,.,,,-,_ -:.-, ... .., .. .... . . Raa+ .,...:_...-..,....:-..• ..:•.. 1,...... -4„,..:,:„.:„..„.,.-;.i.::..!;:::.,,,..:77,-•:---.,-,•-•,:7,- ,..4r,--;•,-7-- 400 ,+, `4,,.," tin. p � .+" :- ..:;;.4.,.„.,...::„..,.,..... ....:..4,...:!!•.,.•.„.,„„i,.......:::,.7.;;..„,.;.„„..„r„.„.,..... . .. ,•:::.. ..,n.,‘,, . ___":•,".",,,,,:tftieT..v....-,... .,,liticit--. .:14.::p,.::.:,:]:!.!-.... .., ,gag;• : .. . .. `��� ' vim" ":42-!!---: - il ":-,- . ps, f.M� ¢ .mn wd"` 3 A& "",#Y: L. j P i II.' yew _ '. a :.,..,0,-:•:•••:-• ke eS H F' 4 • . ate" ro!C( Ed 1k' 6 NY .:''.7:i.:4,:-.; ..'d.4. v. � d" t b � r ' r27.d aav[" t> m �b 4,. 640. E " w •xx.?e�-m• °' p y. C w0. Nx.W ,y9% t S tr •• a Ry a x i'^' : • y S 'Ya "«+ m w • aa�W. . x„ �xRcr Rn ai� d € " �4. ,ryia� =a" "s? roa� a�: firF a ta 6 r m t � Rk:; & 2 � t'' ' � H t. da'm 1' : ,�.;..� r4k � qtr r'` g 4x:\ •••••::4,,,: 6 a: � "t o p$RmR ,�: d �. a 4 m` m r 80,. A � y[ :v : a3 v;. 3 •i-R4 4 x=T, .wi 'Ch'^„k"a"t,,,`z.MYf C.. >w.. " •' 1 z%4`M, :%£%A»%1=%»....•**,. . ;'4 .,rx x i a ;_ ., r47;.« z ; • Ar . rrrR il'.„z`.iT'. .«:!, •'+''' 3v •_ w<b5r ' .`3.i♦rt 44'4. , 11�.% '• ',,,,,.*•;%'",s.!', Frs,,. �' ,e '1 «.'Sx`rw",,1 ' E •t Sm:Yxt`i'f•.','.�R. x"S ».{..%.lk•uyy isyz zi r.r j.<i.f.•% . ��., • ka 'vMM. .--4i%zr"%z%.ziz!«{•-:-%z%z%z%,r'yi�,Y yty4 :k+' ;,,.ZS<z..F:'x:%RR %"%""%„%„R"ts.:'z=r"%Rz=z / - • : i- .-x,,,,,•••••ft.r• i -",=####,-;, ,..µ%"x , % % S„ zriwiM' _ R %� ' ' : %z �y1r,R• : . ) 'F %.i«.jyi1 »,r;H!w. 4`}%«.=i .iy *,7,•-t •'�4, = • S .pt4. i ..,n,',x44 1.=Rr"A . 1 %'iSe ..Yn s%Si+% «'%^ . « '' •:... Y, "' ?'i : - .•',-"14.4"-'004".t s. !' 3.' air FV"v��VY'_!Y„ ' r t n= 4 f.a. . • % .. .. .. j • Y .x ',R..,.4. F=x , te • ,L=Y r u4. .g}, %i?.ALMMI.X V w�.♦ . f �.., < �` � M1'E r Wti WUW,.Y«i ♦ .. J*. y • '.c ti .z `.1 ,k ,,.?..:4vuM:NV ». i . . „ry »,-e 3^izl• ,. ' "mow%",• ,Yy+ % .. .w,' 3-, `':!,:':*„.,,;'•i_+x.l: t,fexl>«Ii*'�A.:"S"M _t'i ♦ 5..♦'.»Vii.. '. • �`. zzMI:T ,P. .xxr ' ` 1."4:',A; t • Yr"":1I.l % ...»=%x•i.zi � Wxx. A' ^xS. ' '.:'•W. ; v .*.==" t. f;i yia,i + tzi ♦ nt ; • '1i / `r•F%R :' ` x 1,u i • • w; ::;::ter::r'': {u % n: t • % 4 „ ..fwi, iI «. ; ' Tu:" __ ,wr««. zi Y•R 'y ”'.Z," . . « ”%N.41 '.. :;FsF + ` •:s . '$ .' w`€ i,«„i„xT,"''Al +,,,,4 iV'4:.t ..,«..»:.„f;z's» '" .r;i.it s i:i».A, ' .. !=.%a+ rx 4,1 � is _• tat'tF w F4 I'$ i ,_ • • 1k ,, 4. 3 ✓ a .'t% %„ryi' ', "",..t> y' .. ... k,�[ Y�( • • .\ r m r. F a . • ` ' <� m ` • • ".� a • �.xx. 'tV0d RY �5 = � ,, awl ,,. ' � S intrt s c Y youf � 8;, ,E. �' ac`s ... ' ' • „„ . .., ••• • „ .... ...If_ -.,-_,-. ---......,'-'---,....--- '#: -: ' 1 .'-';''''''''...--.'•.: . ....„.„...-'•• . ..:•••„ .„,,, •••• . „„ . . - -Y.,-• - . ,..' .--"7.,,,...•..".'II, al,,,. ((-7R-(77:4(II• •'''-' -S .'''. -: • •••-: -. • ''''' -:'-'•-:':-.'"!--'.'. • • - • ---- .e. . .. . ....",... _ ,...„.... .„--.. . .. .,,,N„... •....,_.,,........ -.--.. -- ...:-T- 1.....,.. , .... . ..... .,...• , .... •,..:: ., , . • .4,:. ..- ,•g:::::::'•••: --I 0 I PO 4°$4.!!.r. ••:'?Igi: t,.,.. -'.'„....,., 44.4116-• 1;.:'.# ..,. ... '---': - .....4#'•• :--- ...:.''':.4111k.::_- 744 -.NA! .... ...-.• r. IMP •.4.:t .... ,:::.- ,. • ..• ::,.,.. • .. ::.. .. ---- -'• .........,..-•... *- --14- •:iii!" :.:::::":":":'-iY: r':':••;:rIT',;-.''''..:::: "...:=,:7:::'..'•:;,- : .:-;:''''''''''''' ''''' .-':----:-:-'I;Ei!:..)-g::'.'giett'll,'.10.4441 '.. .:•::''::. l''4----..-,--: -- ,‘,.:4,--. , .--..i',:.,--. ''`:. -:.!".„!!...,•-•-• 7A:.'„-:••• '•:'c'';':* ': :- ' ,oi„ --t:::'•,-i•t--- - ..di•iE„' • „'. • „ - ,,.. , „„:„.... ..... ' '-1'....-':'.' ".--'-t""--I ill' itiik-'••• -.N....„.„..,,,,,,,,„„.1,!?„.„„„,„.....„, . „,..,.....,..„ . • . .it...„ .. ,:::::::-..,-,------•ii- - ;"., .!::::•,6,',:.;, ••':. ''••• • '.•,•'-••'-..." ::::0 ttkl:-•!lig 4,.....",;..:: '''''''4'-:*:' •:.:::::*'''.:':::$'•:•• ::.1'....:•::.'":.:.::•:e(7,..(7,.!•••••••••••II(II•••••••,•••'•- I(..7.17((,,7- . .,• .4 ( vie,- .(',.i.; ,,,,,,411(7,4(itin••• ),,.!.4,,,:ii•-•(' ,(,•• 7,, •••1 ..,,,..•-•,(t,,,:( ::::,••,#....,...'77!C',7.71w!:,•••••••?'• --* , . 7 :'.7: :• "•'!...!'.(..•!•• ,y(::::-•II:7---.-.......!;..(:,, .-... ,,:. !I!.-10,,R( •••• -• .R•,••••--7'7- .7- '' 4 ( .... ..• •,„ .4R....,;(,,,(..,„:"„2,;(.(:::„.-..1.7(.!.3...7i.:, ,,,„, („(4,„4,, •- R - .• , tA „I- I:7.'14 • . - ,..i.:'M 4( ( „, '..-.:-:::...);-.,!:-.:','!"... ,(!:•;;.(; ,,,,,,,i..•!-.!,,,,(,11._( 5(,.•--•(' 4-R.--(II-II.:I it#R1'.R;....I' 1.',(1, .,.. : ' '-'• '"',.''''..:':':::.k:'f'''':'l''' le ..':. ----:' ---:::::: -- ••'''':: ••'.i-•••r•-•• „t:',EiP•Migeg t:, .•,!, ..H.R.S:,!!'• •••:•,- •.„. . —...... „. •. . ,....... P:'-Eit.::::----.... • „0: .1. --•••:::• ,....''::. ••:„. . "•::..i., ."- -. •::,L.....,?..,1-4.---,-.....0 •:...•-',:t'!:-4,-..--,- .;',.--.---.!k'i-.!-„„„„:„ - , - . . ." ....„...:„. ....„ .. ....,,.., . „.... .•., „!...„....,..„..,,,,....„....„,.......:„...„..._.„.. ....,.,„....„.„:„.„,,,.,...„,,„,..„.„:„,,,,„,„.,...,,„„,„,..:..„7,:„.,..,,,,i . „., „,.„..,,,.. ..:,.:,.„..„. .":„..„.....,..„...:.,,,,,,„..„„,„,,,„•,...„.„,,i,...,..,,„,,,::,.,....,„.„...„:„.„.",:„....„,....„:„.„,„,„„:„..,,,,„:„.„,,,„.,„..,....:...,„:„...;,,,,..„,:,..,. . . _._ ..,,,..... ..,..,:„.„,,:„...,..... .• ,::,.4,„.„.„,,..„,,,,,„,„,:„„:„,,..„,„,,,.„,„„,„:..,,,,..,,,,,.,..,.,,„:„.,,„...p.,.,...„„....c..„„.:„..":„....;":„,.,,,:.,,i,,„.„.„,„,,,,.„.„..:,:,..:,,,!..,,..,.,,,,„,,,,,,.,:„..„.„....„...,„,,._....„.. .....„.... . ,. ...,„. ,,„.......::,. ,..„.„.„„t„,„„,„„,„:„„,„,,,....„,„,„:„.„.:,,,,,,,„.,.....,•...:,,.,.,.....„...„...,....,„:„....„..„,,,,,,:„.„..„.„...,47.,..:.„:„,,,,„:.,,,„,„,„ :„....,..„.......„,„„ .,,,,,,,,,......„..,...,.....„..„,...„,..,,,...„,,..... . . .It7i-------'-!'•'-:.-: Y' ••••. .•„;.: ,,------:•ii..,--:----it'•;•::-;k:::--:::- • „. :„. ::. , „. . .: .„...,-„,„ . ..,...„...' „ ....•-•.:.•:,....,...„ ••,•-• - • .„•,,,,,,,,..'•:.1-..,•••:-.':-.-.•-•...,•••••••,••••-.-•••,•-• ''•!h:::i,..::::-4:it'i,„:•'-f'.P-:''2„,„:....:t:•••,,•-•-• . .., . ....„. , , ,„.. „„ -„. ,.••••--- „ . ,. --------.. ',• 4..: • • •..... . ,. .,..........,. .... ..... ............., ..,„. ....... ..„.........„........ ...,..,....„.,:.:...,..,,„.„..„,,,!,,.,,,,.,, ...., „: ....0,,,„......,. „. . .. „. .„...„. . ..,.,,...,. , .4- 0' ,..": ,-' '0 • r « 9 „ • •• S:,Ax a ��� a � sag 6 i P dt • • '-...,--'• a. Z.. .�. .a - F �+ , :,r�. qty a" 4:. '41 psi m, d- ; s "c ;'t - ?+ k•• r -, a...:.. Ems' _ ',: fl i , '� 1. : ' • W it 9 , r 99 4 .411 g 4 3i .tm s r ae ?ai r �n ". wig:%. .' ' , 4, • fir ' $T' 4 F4, 4 n .. d£_ yGT `' .1,-.,$„'". CCC„ # -. . die 5 " sz 44• sN ;; omy`Y 5 $.�# t` t a . i h ,z'z' •*4 i'0..?r %F � .t„_' kz z i 4-4,„1!=„-„v ,lt ' -'.r.. - Y{(q '3 =t%=fn v, y. 'N n�" �yY.� +�4y'4'''4 44'A.;<- 4'•LK,. zrcz%.iix :'*I.; .,' "., " Y f ':Sr'.R14',,,,,,,,3£> ,'�• q'a F - i j� ,�� , "' <R �.H•'•• "�% . iiys. " tY , moi:T.;-,s;.•. .•R+x R i j,py yF, %z,at ".y ' .,..'k M w „ ., .*.n:4xij 4• R !r = ,.A `"*,•:.T k x " % •.4.. ''q >z < x`%r' `r"4 4,$:% i. �.y ' tw: c.% r1 , %" iA :0,„A:.44,0•,-,:.:,:»:„06,:x +n %R �..fv'Sq''art .i :..0 ry"' RRR%r £'3: Ys�;wYyikYz♦ Lq,4..4 . ". , z%y�^e4 7:'.;I< Yd k T "L. . ‹,. f rF,. %tw4 ',:,+44 1• ih'E uZ yh :yt . '< ,� ,q. 'e ?.Ee .4.,' . {G�' ' ',%nYi yyapI( q i . .,. *****-. il4 4•1;•.4:4•.< •.#14k--b•.'•' 'x ', tr rt '4ir •ngµ 4' .,4 ", �1 ,4. ?T`„*•,. zk bE, a =IK wx }Y ,i I. . PY✓ G, ..t1•,,„ y kti • cjt L i,y; •', .yr1%,.','::y<tLE�'+.>'aP• �:,f�� "., ,✓,jy,a%e'.m,".`:.:.,: %'t .. � w: _ %• r. •" ;. fw1" :..,f,," r1 [%;%1>, � j .4,4,"''3\. ;:”£2w% z` s.'wy • • At >!�y4, Tt,:sY,, r te.. . ✓,1+ 4. •\y *. ! ' +0} <.u»% » . 14. n,„?., ' .< .H i zt'i . �YrtA � + r < t5 `.J,!•# .," �t. jf• ' ;,uA.7,-� ,.. ,,Jy £ ''r'nr . q +'�" •" ` ' aY°• '» :,: A•w4 !r'xR .+. .+ < *s * F »' • 7. *%:'`.`1* t'£.s,sr....1`-'t. 'id +,, ,,:z4,),.,;4",,„:44,<4;,.,. .r N Y ^ ,» «{'" r?z���'ny[ ,1�.1•': " • { I.r.: x• 7. "' rA.' - ..f .kk • yi:f - .t: Ry �R»%� ..R' V, :40,* 4tSi•IH•4,ttegi .S „„,,,c-,,, k ,:4"„:.,,t, .x• ' n . ' : . ", .4" �P $s ,ys' r#. , , , .", v , '="S+, <ttta;t.r ""rr1�: ,. ,....<.«.''', s.:y .7.. ,; vc.. •i1'r q.YdF . y • r am's er'•' •a.: "jw .' • ' : :. £. 4"tJ+: *'i'" n 4Y'=%,£zz n:. %zi! .j •*1i'r%z --..,,,:,:i...4.., .'"`R , fiX"." ,T -".r j1 ' ,. W F % ' #,, ,411:'•. ' ": %°y ' ". h ,-. 4 4't.',4',. . r »"'. ,t,. -." S r'w e • • w • .5 x »' 'Y <,- ,xx. sr.. x .x 3F 4',,4*.ra'... m >»'SYr, �tf, • „.'f<' •-'SS`x •4e.'" s 't. u1 i - ',! .''r.' , r ,_}«4- {t'.''%:":' =F'-;•" ' - -+..'i,,.» y. , <\.�3j '.nit• - <Cz% :s.tr<�q-:f<w...4,<�.1 *,.:44,,, ,.: �,:`w a,= • Q ' p Y >�f h' S1,, 2.♦ � '4. + jos P`r...n • F! :� s • • • t wF ,'.‘: f.1+1'444.';' : y?'"•=:sw,"yrSS +f'7.4'.: ��•• � C7< '•fir"y ++ :".*..#*".q wl: %` . i+..+;:+'r:ksn, `{gyf... %SF:Y�,,, ff . ...�yFf»I' A :',..t.. fl ',..`,T,(4:..`,«k. • » es� F"z •`!szs . .yxz• •;;;;,,,*,,:»z' - y,'iz% e et-A' „% ��_ {',,' r' . r '% ' jk." s. .515,y*. -nt '% =:r`'" .-t-,,,-,' A` "" h ;5• tt "' %.: ;,` y '%%%-ssr: ; +.• k.»'ih: t , *''xr ir* '•2: S \� » ? i *: YYY .Y A• t '.x+F.,•41!-'•",.70'10... a' .'W"'»« 1'. t ''r,„' jL{ <JtYrY '% � t%, "„ 3j^ .,-;„;0#>:„7.# � . tWij W. " . tte M i, f•a"t,',,l' .y[+.i 1t... q }f ,r„veiY %=!ll t'i't' %y ' , .r., 3R i> « .da,(< '....s•: ....:.Y-.w•.,xw-' '-"'w r};.�FR'•S�c'w.'II,''...NSI"ti z'Ie�' -E „",a�" ' ?E'"t�4w�r'r.,Y�>s»•» s :.:t'.,Y't:”i. .r, . 't,.4, }M.. .+ p y-'.e ,'R»., • • .•s .! om.4 % i •<i?- f s^y^''"z ;..S, r'*? z apy„ ''«.SsV?tk ». M"xzF .» 'r: ”" 'e;4X&4i4'nk'r;»%'.'.• <R. Lrzii"% 44 ?y "rt 8"";e'r,•`r' ,.�vtv. 4010100),/"...10.1.. :7'•'••• ,/ :! Y '% .:.:om . 5' Jy$ ,"-j;. 'T2'Sy; yfh -'iP<- • < . r .n+> : F...,0MA '""" tYa ' ,,,i " 4v '' ''.*«e ui > ' *•,'%4'''` < ..' .. ......,...:t:'...16W.42,.... '. '',:,',4,1/1.1.,,,,,-,.511-,E.6,,,,a:x.., tiorpaiih,:k,..,‘b.,11,110.4 ale,-,,,!,i;TH- N*1112,r; 1-.-,1,-:,. It (h i Vs t^ LL x ' ,. .,^ e u 4 rte'Y ' 0' qe u .w �i ' . I r ° ,ice a, F y s u Y r SV M N• ..:.,,,,-,;,,„:;,..,,,.,,,,.ri,,,,,:..,.:,,,,,,.;:•.,:ii',„;,4,1,,,•,,.5.4...,.;,,,,,,,:,11.::‘,4;,.,4:',',,,t::.,'..,•,...fr.:krilA,.71,..,,, • , .,,:ii:,1::iii,,,,,I.,1.1.r.ot:',,,-,-„,„-,-;*,,,,i.,,,,,,,.,. .,,,,,,,,,i.,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,..,,,ia,;:.;.,,k,,,., R wt.'P' •p ., .. � � .� tea. yy� # r. and •Y$�4�. d : � A • - k ub4 • x4 f$ s. fib' x ` yam? • Ort N 66 . A. • ° is e • , • • • • • g; • .b4« • a �? ,'" ' 1,00 : r >« a,,,/,'+cy �e�t tt k^ 3 � 4i. a ggg sk :r &p" �'e s - 4a a rw,'rP „ y 04 't - #ski .. ^° a x xri .aJe I, - low 4. Y. M ' T fl *gam s . �r}'i R MFh .it`+A,',4'.7"i" N t ?J r Ms R<< .�M<h•».;,..Y'i i•YYYY%4 :r:' ire. , x. j.�;< %. icy: ie ' ..::9,ac , ), :• :� a • i 4 a r itk4 i x .0, < %iw.\:s w . < ;� ,. w to i'% ,,4 44, r t .4, sy ; 4. A'+44: < . yr{',',,,.',','4. S. <£ 3 , . !?.:44 'a Y<f<r�.<>>R :Fi< 4, Y aT< < • iA 7*:"'*:7'.* • < < t< < < R' t< Y R < ^ , ^A t4t4t! 44 { 4 4.z.. 'rte ',.1-::,,i,',....''.. .. -yZ..•. �*.{F • e .t Vii:= - «. "««,•«f,r..'. • < 1. . _ • ` »%=x%.Vy ..�', s ..�, *',,kx4..i' •:,'T«"" .,4S:'';�'45j, -1^1, Y Y x r' E ..r«f.F. 3' xt' - ' k +�T'�.tt:':'*,F""'«.i:.?%:�'.r`.»•m H3M %i�,= . xx;x ,�„R.• < ^ „” rsi}.<i .. a . ``Y.4'"*»,%_$�rA s••i5 „jr,F #w.., .:,'si, ..'r�"1,'» IC?;.<.'»�`: t: .Cit iy*t � °^s. 'yk•.x"•"#'".##i t tk, , • qq[ tt } . ., {,:sig<3 ,1'itt -`:: " A„ .4 •:4Fw I' Y _ ." " hz<< t£. t1 . +d " R x R ^ w + * w A' ' y Y,y ««w"' i 111) i" <, i.« i[i ^ R='r ,r F... ,x #.:: ' Is, 1.r et <I^w 3 44. ... -e „w'a_,< ,d _c, "r, . .. w 'i -.. .L;=»'R' + •"' sit'_ y.y ..1;:+i; 4a4i, _ 14-/�1 ';':„'t:&.?r L"ii<+.• _ _"=i[> �++} ?+.•iG . ^Y' ,. r".„,-*::,-,• < , ^w t+i r t .+. �/`z yY �k,#,:"+ii., 'It.,..��� '<"Si�4 w�','� ! '«Y« k".i �� zw� _ ♦iYe. ## r £. •a,"R.+4.fl,tlt:. ye"' S .. .'i r. .£,„zlz.%••*' r T �k"„. '4'''.#.v.' ' '`1.' ;K'� ;'••• ,i-..- .v w+%y^�L, '3, ..:.i,YprR y�z`xzw.`.''.. ': ".`.r:'.�+ ' .,"P,.C': y .•,r"<'k�' t�"A s ''A ,. '14:,...„:4442"...,, x+«`:•r'r' x=`<»�£. r' x. �i'. t ww`-:',,%,,,,,...i,•,:::;, '•'•+_ . `" t44, "F'ix'.++«:._c3,%c'+I'w==$=i,'>xt, % '„'i",.l}%•t x`_ r f#, ' ',#P. ,'.0.. 4.`:e x r•« ,',-,'.y»'.'. w.'a* . `v'" .110,--,,,..,---4" "�, •,«r«»A '.i+w,:,G.,•r,•r< '"•• '�^•: + 0 a�Y4 x.w k. <. %' .. F• , x.•. <<r.< fAI,t 0,^;k i a .'',i- t ♦ � rs. »...t"" x zi jjx d `�� Ti 1.4 ,n3F xstfr'.< Al. j • .. . " 3 <' wa''Tr"' y- 4. !.'34' • u, < x rrrxl••' �,,i ry a ! • j am. ` �'''�T N.'+.� w{%��y. 3'a' z .�-"+ -,.%,„, _ �'z•%z' wL <•'t �' r. . } `, wo `a. i#: � �.,',:, s.. •,,,#=:-;:r..."-•,.,•........:„,..4.'> •• .,s{�':.,.':':rr �. ,�i -R<.<»',• _t'�«« %sr+3=zzr,a ;.,.:',...=:„Y.-:, = k�+='SFzzal:Ar'i4.. ......4• r%rwr Y,[_£,,. LI'r t.•.rrr•" yYet'<,i'r ": ,:k'' =t a1•y _ - .+�._y•..#,*: �' ', • E•r%r.•^x.,+r i •r••,i. .�.•.+-":y•' •= xr, :, < r --,:-..-i:„,*r s '�`% :.,%., t.: t"A»e-:.,-7•‘407e4= .. . F+.;i •==s a .. .Y • .. ' <.•i+ '..2,..r r <<.'" ;. wit _,<.a r' r' k.<t<•r�F< ',._.«. .'u` •„r• -n.:'«»'' 1 'r•• (''-:,,t. ."; *.•^Y'*,`-} ' < +r,'k . x .!!,..zzx`.'; ,;' .<.;', ',t 'M'.•.::• ==- 'rr%F'''yt'•.4. • '.'-,�i+zF.yy +M>!"' '',�•.,', '" �'.Yf.,,. E• .• ,I, ' � � ••ty.< : .. .. {' x.. xs ,:„4:0,---,,,,,,,f,:t, k t' "w w'r s' W0.. r.»•'zs.zw . as ' a'R ,:�, Y :. Y ..;:::„,•-n,,,,,`M ww /: p •;s•`• ',-" • V» =.,E . + l*; '�:.y,' .t.F1'f,%.y;S�,' �_.'„.;y..#d'» ++'� `':r s, rr`.p'+� •• 's, <'y »•.',„„-•-,,E.,..,. .•W;••'<#. +ra+h .•, ,,,, +xY �.�'<ww• « ry ..^+,w rrwr -#.i' F#". - _ `t r`F+'yti •,t' ,t ,;;,'..,,,,v,..',•.;-1g,, „•Mrs 4:4,,:',7, , ,, +' i' •`S,< +' 4) ,,,fs" *}„:3^ '.'!fj .." . *1:: 1 r..0 ,a'.,jf S<%,[ 3 + ,[ t .0� + x+�' �" a :a:Y.4••G•.«. �",,N i.1.•:.,•+1.X •w"rr o", fes' ,..'s:•.-::** *fi..'+.#+'t ,'• , 04.+0w.l..E. �s`<z 3w �',N l.."`♦ac% ai';.•• !• Y" Yi,w f.'�,,[rz x Y,,z., G` aft'x lk G�41+ :4.,+' t I •t:#'' +•*- F.',�•G t` `"'.zt #,*• carkN't a' M*. r#,' .^, t; • Fw�F ;, lr +f„ CG� ar' '+,'•: %'yzi+ N^s i �til ' z••f5, I,3'' .',��++ r. .i"'kt'�>''Yr"zr'+iz :Y s ''Yzz r'"G"1.'j tf;'' .z:++A' ..`..v+(h.e 1 —X i+,x r„ A,` ',�r'.,.; .„ ! S•a, res•<' F »,•ar" ..*,:,::#7+:''T. '�'�;e ..• Tt .3-t \5:., y r i ,,.+.4.a"(^■"} wk.. ix,,n.,' if' ,RF.w " z• "Y "•�iS:•<•+ n zRi .. .t 3 , ,�%,:i.,,,S z•,,,,..4 +, _j�, r Y 1 F i;�: , '.,1.41;•„: ,[ r :.Z<'+ z• S4 yzYR «Yz >i '''''-x$,.;'1 E "•Tz.etu, "? � : Ao'S,tk"„4. L,"s>-5,;•::::;:::::,:;•;,.....—' • x" '_" ir .i-t,,-'4...::;:;:::::::":4,4‘;.'„1:: fe mo .P' •kt' "' x"Rrx <t s i' , . , ElE."w . Las •_ .'r. t »u k7-1 " t. i . ' . , f. •^ ;' .'. ,' /Y_.S .r?i _7 ,' E r n Y ,,:-4:.',,,,,* ,,,,'" :', a..; 4. -•f. .42':.,....., e.: itt),:,,N4# ,41,.4, . 4 24-'4' 74 > R , <. >N .w L< ' t 3' t a 16. • 414,1 44 (g I t`�fris MPI _ I ,1 ,• ar , , r , ec .. - .., 10, a as . ,, a '"i. r 'n x t �,. .,•." %, . ..:5:!:.:„:.,;..:...,... .. -,.....::-kli,"-.,),. .0„ :• . ....„,,,..„.„......,,„:„,,:.w,„„„,,,,,,„„,,,,,„,„,,,.„..,,!,,,,:,,,:„„.„,:,,,.....„,,,,...„,,,„,„..„ --:.:: ''''::::„-.:-..-,.::,::,::::::::::'_!:,':::,':o. ,,,,•..i.-----..,„::::.... .. '.. t:„.i,,.-t'.,---,'.,:.--,„-.,-:.•,,':•,'.i'-:'::„.:•'.iv:':'':,',:,t,:,,':,',''!„:w.:,...'.:::'::':...'..:.....::;-,•:::,,';,--';.::,r,.„,„',.:.,;i-'';'„.,'izi,,,g;,:,9,:•;:::::::,:::':,:g'.;'.:'r:„,:;:::.' ::, •,-.:-.,_:•::•„. „.:,.„.„,,,,,..v,„,...,E,„,,,o„,„,.,.,,,,„,„,..,,,..gR,,„„.„,„„,,,•m. ., ,..„,......„.,.,...„,„„,.........,.„,•:„:,:„,„,„,„,„..,„,....,..„.4...,....„. ....,:.,, -----.44:..r.14ri,:..':ikrrilr''':2.11.001.'-likOMinigje '.'..••F':'::19SOARDit -'Ap:' ". :'4,,,-.; 'Ser% �" xa,:. g # 't 'Wms W .NO: x A f i .a 4 R iy . , .ss + ,*., ti .. '" :k: ." - %� gq 3iCg� E S C ., ,THF �kY W ^ k t 434 d • bt 4 'h rtE � Y�T € `4' 'y axe .:rr *' ', y .5'12� i �, � ':.i...1#41:',�; # ,ate �� � z- � �. h « *';.• yk a t t • ti 4 'r 5 r k «, :ta »' �' - y 1' .. - dk . P° Rig € ',,° W �z� �"` c. ',Si a (�MyE wi "g"" Cr�. p ..,'..,,,4gr . t $ ~ r$ : y " Jefferson County Code 18.30.130 Landscaping/screening. (1)Application. Landscaping or screening shall be provided for all multifamily residential, commercial and industrial land uses, small-scale recreational and tourist uses,and as required in other sections of this code,except that landscaping will not be required of industrial uses within the resource-based industrial district when the development is sufficiently screened from public view. (2)General Provisions. (a) Existing trees,vegetative plantings, undisturbed open space,and/or topographic or natural features which meet or exceed these standards shall be considered to fulfill the landscaping or screening requirements of this section and any other applicable reference to these screening requirements in other sections of this code. (b)The administrator may authorize variations to the landscaping/screening requirements of this section to: (i) Provide consideration of topography, natural features,existing native vegetation and soils on the site and site location in relation to adjacent and surrounding uses; (ii)Allow alternative plant mixes or berming that accomplish the purposes of the type of landscape screening required; (iii)Conserve water through the concept of xeriscaping; (iv) Provide flexibility in the size of initial plantings; and (v) Ensure that any nonresidential use,structure or activity when proposed in a rural residential (RR) district shall be compatible with that of existing and anticipated future uses in the district. (3) Landscape Screening.The three types of landscaping screens are described and applied as follows. (a) "Screen-A" landscaping: (i) Is a "full screen" that functions as a visual barrier.This landscaping is typically found between residential and nonresidential areas; (ii)Shall at a minimum consist of: (A)A mix of primarily evergreen trees and shrubs generally interspersed to form a continuous year- round screen that grows to at least eight feet in height within two growing seasons. (b) "Screen-B" landscaping: (i) Is a "filtered screen"that functions as a visual separator.This landscaping is typically found between commercial and industrial uses; between differing types of residential development;and to screen industrial uses from the road; (ii)Shall at a minimum consist of: (A)A mix of evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs generally interspersed to create a filtered screen that grows to at least eight feet in height within two growing seasons. (c) "Screen-C" landscaping: (i) Is a "see-through screen"that functions as a partial visual separator to soften the appearance of parking areas and building elevations.This landscaping is typically found along road frontage or between multiple-family developments; (ii)Shall at a minimum consist of: (A)A mix of evergreen and deciduous trees or shrubs generally interspersed to create a continuous canopy. (4) Landscaping Road Frontages.The average width or depth of perimeter landscaping along road frontages and required locations on private property shall be provided as follows: (a)Ten feet of Screen-B landscaping shall be provided for an industrial development. (b)Ten feet of Screen-B landscaping shall be provided for all above-ground utility facilities or development,excluding distribution and transmission corridors, located outside a public right-of way. (c)Ten feet of Screen-C landscaping shall be provided for all commercial or multiple-family residential development. (5) Landscaping of Interior Lot Lines.The average width or depth of perimeter landscaping along interior lot lines shall be provided as follows: (a) Fifteen feet of Screen-A landscaping shall be included in all commercial, industrial, or small-scale recreational and tourist development along any portion adjacent to a residential use or district,except as may be varied by the administrator under subsection (2)(b)of this section. (b)Ten feet of Screen-B landscaping shall be included in all multiple-family development along any portion adjacent to a single-family residential use and in an industrial development along any portion adjacent to a nonindustrial development,except as provided in subsection (5)(a) of this section. (6) Landscaping for Parking Lots. Landscaping shall be provided for commercial, industrial,small-scale recreational and tourist uses,and multifamily residential use surface parking lots,with five or more parking stalls,as follows: (a) Screening shall be provided on each side,front, and/or rear of a parking lot where such side, front, and/or rear abuts any residential use or district,except that no screening is required where the elevation of the parking area lot line is four feet higher than the finished elevation of the parking area surface. (b) Parking lot screening and landscaping shall be kept in good condition and shall meet the following conditions: (i) It shall be continuous where required along a side,front or rear of a parking area and shall not be less than four feet in height above the grade of the parking lot surface, broken only for accessways and aisles; provided,that the screening shall not be permitted for a distance of 20 feet on each side of a parking area accessway to ensure proper sight distance. Where screening is prohibited by the above provisions, low lying shrubs or other similar plantings shall be placed;such plantings shall not be allowed to exceed three feet in height. (ii)Screening shall not be installed in such a manner as to obstruct the free use of any fire hydrant. (iii)The space between the landscaping screen and the right-of-way,except for any pedestrian access improvements, shall be landscaped with grass, shrubs,trees,or evergreen groundcover.On the sides and rear of parking areas not facing a street, such landscaping shall be required between screening and the lot line. (7) Landscape Plan.When screening is required, a landscaping plan shall be submitted with the project application to indicate how the minimum screening requirements are met.The plan must meet the following requirements: (a)The landscape plan shall be drawn on the same base map as the development plans or on a separate sheet properly labeled and shall identify the following: (i)Total landscape area; (ii) Landscape materials, plant names, and applicable size; (iii) Property lines; (iv} Impervious surfaces; (v) Existing or proposed structures,fences,and retaining walls; and (vi) Natural features or vegetation left in natural state. (b)The required landscaping shall be installed prior to project occupancy. However,a certificate of occupancy may be issued prior to installation of the required landscaping if a bond or other form of appropriate surety is posted in a manner acceptable to theministrator.The time limit for compliance may be extended to allow installation of such required landscaping during the next planting season, (8)Maintenance. (a)All landscaping and necessary support systems shall be maintained for the life of the project. (b)All landscape materials shall be pruned and trimmed as necessary to maintain a healthy growing condition. (c) Landscape areas shall be kept free of trash. [Ord. 8-06§ 1] li OP an iYl P ? — — — — ADJACENT LAND UBE-RCSIO@1,L,L — ... m PROPERTY LINE • 260.64' iAisi P Z u , � b TYPE'A"LANDSCAPE OfAtEE11ING g " .t. _ 4, T -1 4 m ; - . 1 - 91De Y MTBACK II PROPERTY T D � _` '"� z 1 P rim `n 0 F IrF 1 ° -\ >, \\N— -. /\ems, T�.3 Ma h , 4' 50.0' \ • a 1 Aec, 2••..4. • ._ ., -c, ii , sQ,\,,,r ,- 0 ; , .4, \ ... ; , ,t„. fli , .1 , \\, , , , . .A 7.„. ,, , , , s„,, / 11 .11 I z ? , , , ,„ . 0I t��.�. ,.., ,,, tri,g?A )IN Jk / ,‘, . --- i§i 8 '' .61) . / 71 II Q• i f§� �\1`1' // // % •o j ,i I F 7 �\i I A /W N - JI Ii ,N� ,' rn M 1 20'-O' \ ig r i \I \ x197.0' • Ai 15 -0'2 i l' -\\ s\)1 7C 1. \ \y4 ° \� _ PRE-CN6INEEREV GREENHOUSE > �[ N 11 rh,; �\ Q, O\ i —CI (9)24'x19Y•9.504 50FT \ \ § 1i' i ?ii BUILDING'b'— 50.od ; \\\\ ` \y 1-+ \BWo - I li f r \ o.,?. 14 462rn1 I \ 92A\111 m '� i Vv g I +d ._.- 1i1j . \ I A \ED152.0' 1 x I 'I: \ G.SIt N1 • • If $ -P•••.-'�lT $ \�� BUILDING"E" 9.504 SOFT Q NNI! 1 II s , �' \\ \ f O II \ @ \ \\ 132`0'alQill P I I \\,, ,,\,,,,,, . N \PRE-0V6MEER®6REENN \ • A 24'-0'x1379,168 QFT a15E \N aCg'I Ii. 1 NuFF §\ BUILDM6"F' \ 1 11/ \\•� x \ 39'-0' \\192A\\\ \\\ u q 91x YARD SETBACK PROPERTY LINE • 268.17 03 z ADJACENT LAND OW:LIGHT INOVBTRU•L _—. Et a Ou p,p, 1 jVgQ l=-___ Q D QU' Tql z --e lA 'c < < IO,� (�Z �yy 91 L.. ...� II m$ UI 51 O OA D? $. _ _35. Q' }'1 = cn bO lo` = o P 11°ga. IN_, _5Ua0 Q m g v DREAM CITY, �c : 5111 IM-i(Vv_MENTS ati , 11111 111 1 111111 o 1 7 p I�� m 19 'ENNA,1 . W7 li " N t O Na -I 99E98 VM'ON3SNMO1121Od /d w CD 5'6 N 1 }I 133211SS510I2130321d'MMI r 11!> 03 1111 1 IIIII SLNaWAO?ldWI aLIS : 011 Iu1O Wv3 1Gill iii . a h Q a� ° 'i J — l merge z o 6 5r °° o v m°' fig' a— P. " _�`; 1 P-'. �g all 9P W 8 P. "J o � co ar. P8fi v_8 ° o `A ,°n g. L I PI La ° wda�=` I __IL L m0 Ws41 °°1 t tI mcc .- .OS.—O ZL^ H mm._c OEIm sn ; Oh � °IO w c muse f ` iL OIL �Da t' 8.-H Jm O O I ! I t 0 > 20 InO'EIItt ar'O p a v 1 Q �< LIL_ � � pillfpSJx2 a4. pp O = rg � •7 1NI1 Sno,111911 Yet LINY11Ni'MW 1 8 A AL'89L • iNrI A.LIaM011/ r7.aAas oar.aat-Immesh- 2, D _2N►I axua _ _—� .91 a. ldas E9L'E•,C9N3-2bt 111W` �S I lit.I ', , 35f10NNe_9 N19N3-3t/d .� I ` mi 1 4 III 21 q0 , .., ;_i1T • -a,9NITV9 • , !�u 9 14E5 401'6•,ZELXK!- '1 i. X\4. k i ! i d �. 9 Q3b32W9N3-321d I *wNp �� f-At i r I fa ii t : Ilk w • II .Q..9NK1-IIfl9 I p r. 1dD5 i0$'b•.CELX4L(E) • - Opig I LL 11219 Q3Y33N19N3-3ild V 1......... §..ii, P : 1 1 — -- - iii i I Q N Jf\::z ih — - I ,! s :art° s : . 1 1 1 1 0 . r, . r . -,,,...,,,, ... ii . 1 f Lag 1 ;� 111 1 gl 1 .1 ;4 . it.. \ ,.. , , m I i I rzL 6. .ie- — '+ \` „ �r °ti \ter \`-- j,. Q • ..":4;16:01,4- �I L_ — —�— ` `4,\ /� `\'- _'_ fl 1�L 0 I 1 ` i'll' L .. . -• 1 _ -� 2 4 _ — ^ L1.1 �rsr. L.1_ 319'992 • iN9 uaaeowl QQ 0 I MLA019iY WA aNYL 11B'MGvij �'(�j l t 1 .. E /1( S Joel Peterson From: Bill Staples <wlstaplesl@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 6:01 PM To: Liquor Control Board Enforcement Cc: Joel Peterson; Wendy Davis Subject: County required Vegetative Screening Officer Anderson, I am hoping you have had a chance to communicate with Joel Peterson of Jefferson County DCD. I would like to get a vegetation screening plan, as required by our county permits,that meets both the needs of Jefferson County DCD and the WA State LCB. I am copying Joel on this email to facilitate that conversation. He can also be reached at(360) 379-4457. Thank you. 1 Iti' 0 40 -11 'Z. 0 a, - 1 tv a 0. —4 4 CD a: "•1. Z: )*(13 Cl . = N ..0. 0 0 Z A) — LP < 1' cm 7 0 w el r 5; co _-j cp 0 . . 19 0 .7 s! 41( 1.0 1.0 00 z r) P4 T.I 6•• wit; "-I -- t-i -.- =ta rn 4 o —" 2:'..rill La Orr II, , _ 4....W .r.d lip Ca ti t: 0 ... ......'" n1,. 2... -4.-f" +.. 4 it . E-- , ,- *'''' -I 11-1 n' I . ....... 0, 0 -' .) nrillag• . __ ke: . .. ..... — 4- 1-4 173 n ifffl 11 III —I 1 r NI 0 ii."I 1 -' --11 •""=en ‘-- rrt 'C'''. 1,..3 na --,-,- c, NJ UNI -- , 0_7 F ',,'— '91. 1M A 1-4 I --7-'_ rn - r0 ''' TA os 1;7-4,.. ist — " ...r., to ( 1 1 (3 — 0 11-1 r-rs 1 rtt: ....t t"' i inn ,,, -(A .,,,,,, .1-- '4'i N.„ :a.. i L:._________-).) '50 -nm 0 ..1 . 4. p r, " c, z t-A o .. fo 1'J 41( 0 .,C.t....;row...........q.......a. • Co (X 0 CA h M -0 -1 o O --+ r%) C) = a z A (U) S:3 H r11 C0 :� al copy 1—' ,CD ' ri. 2 .-a I} t OND O N -1 D 1- a 0 2 0 r A m ici O Z m Ill Z , HIt !girt) 0 r" jij W .-Cn VI2 -'-N z rn 1p w 3x 3 -1 0 osq+V 0 -rD r4 rim _ nrr; ' -H L WI- - 9 i Fti onto ,_ 1.7r =.N $+n Doi UN,7 P. _ .�.. 7a n;'� m m y W C3 rrt o N v w 60 A i t, o o I AL3 19 --hN N I , •T , Ni n mo ! I 10 w ° COC...0i o 111 c co co N 0 Q 0= U1 Q N lir A JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE I LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA14-00090 APPLICANT: MARC HILT PO BOX 1909 192 W FREDERICKS ST PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368-0062 Application Received Date: October 30, 2014 Application Complete Date: December 18, 2014 Application Notice Date: December 24, 2014 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 192 W FREDERICKS ST EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13, LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN VAC ALLEY, SOPHIA ST, &SNAC ELWOOD ST ADJ PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: DEVELOPMENT OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARCEL FOR COMMERCIAL AGRICULTURE, STORMWATER PERMIT WITH SEPA-- Dream City, LLC proposes to develop a zoned Light Industrial parcel for marijuana production at 192 W. Fredericks Street, Parcel 948601301. Phase 1 includes remodeling existing 2,592 sf building, dismantling 576 sf car port, adding 7,000 sf insulated metal building and making stormwater improvements. Phase 2 includes additional 7,000 sf building and three greenhouses totalling 22,638 sf; and addition of fire access lane. The project requires a stormwater permit, building permits, septic review and SEPA review for all phases. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on January 7,2015. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION AND PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable development regulations, and the project review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an EIS is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold (final) determination may be obtained upon request, and will be mailed to any person commenting upon the notice of application. The SEPA Official has determined that: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The Department expects to issue a DNS for this proposal. If the proposal is approved, policies and performance standards found in the Jefferson County Code and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan will be used to form permit conditions intended to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Additional conditions or mitigation measures may be required under SEPA. This will be the only opportunity to make comments related to SEPA. There will not be another comment period after the threshold (final) SEPA determination is made. In addition, since this is a Type I permit application, the threshold determination cannot be appealed except to Superior Court. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: This is a Type I Permit Application and there will be no public hearings. The final permit decision for this Type I permit application will be made by the Administrator. The decision cannot be appealed except to Superior Court. C°N coG JEFFERSON COUNTY �� DEPA,RTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ,� 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.iefferson.wa.us/communitvdevelopment pGTel: 360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcd@co.iefferson.wa.us SquareoNE Resource Center I Building Permits & Inspections I Development Review I Long Range Planning FINAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE AND LEAD AGENCY STATUS DATE: February 12,2015 PROPONENTS: Dream City,LLC 192 W. Fredericks Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 PROPOSAL: The project is to develop a Light Industrial parcel on the western side of the Glen Cove Light Industrial District for a marijuana production facility. Phase 1 includes remodeling an existing 2,592 s.£ building, dismantling a 576 s.f. carport,adding a 7,000 s.f insulated metal building and making stormwater improvements. Phase 2 includes an additional 7,000 s.f.building and three greenhouses totaling 22,638 s.f.,and the addition of a fire access lane. PROPERTY LOCATION: 192 W. Fredericks Street,Port Townsend LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 948601301,EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13,LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN VAC ALLEY,SOPHIA ST.& SNAC ELWOOD ST ADJ NOTICE OF LEAD AGENCY: Jefferson County has determined that it is the lead agency for the above- described proposal. NOTICE OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE: Jefferson County has determined that the above described proposal, conducted in conformance with the applicable Jefferson County Codes and Ordinances,would not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment,and an environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2Xc). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the Jefferson County Development Review Division. COMMENT PERIOD: This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. Jefferson County has considered comments on its preliminary determination of nonsignificance. There is no further comment period on the DNS. APPEAL: There is no Administrative Appeal process under the Jefferson County Code for Type I permit decisions as-specified by JCC 18.40.260 and JCC 18.40.810(1). Appeal of a Type I permit requires Judicial Appeal as specified by Section 18.40.340 of the JCC. SLA ' 2 /r '5 z%5 (-) Carl Smith, SEPA Responsible Official Date MEMORANDUM TO: Carl Smith, SEPA Responsible Official FROM: Joel Peterson,Associate Planner DATE: February 11, 2015 SUBJECT: Analysis for Threshold Determination under the rules of the State Environmental Policy Act(WAC 197-11) Proponent: Marc Hilt Dream City,LLC 192 W.Fredericks Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Representative: Simon Little/Studio STL Application: MLA14-00090/ZON14-00045 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Proposal: The project is to develop a Light Industrial parcel on the western side of the Glen Cove Light Industrial District for a marijuana production facility. Phase 1 includes remodeling an existing 2,592 s.f. building, dismantling a 576 s.f. carport,adding a 7,000 s.f. insulated metal building and making stormwater improvements. Phase 2 includes an additional 7,000 s.f.building and three greenhouses totaling 22,638 s.f.,and the addition of a fire access lane. Property Location: 192 W.Fredericks Street, Port Townsend Legal Description: Parcel 948601301,EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13, LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN VAC ALLEY, SOPHIA ST. & SNAC ELWOOD ST ADJ Site Conditions: The parcel is just under two acres and is mostly wooded with regrowth. The site has an existing garage/shop and carport. The parcel includes vacated portions of Sophia Street to the west, vacated portion of Elwood Street to the north, and vacated portion of Louisa Street to the east. Access to the parcel is from West Fredericks Street on the right,past Louisa Street on the left. The site has sloping topography which will be levelled in preparation for development. Surrounding Area: The parcel is in the portion of Glen Cove that extends west of State Route 19. This extension includes properties north of West Fredericks Street zoned Light Industrial,and south of West Fredericks Street zoned Light Industrial/Commercial. The Glen Cove Light Industrial District is surrounded by residential parcels,primarily Rural Residential 1:5. The subject parcel is on the extreme western extent of the Glen Cove Light Industrial District and abuts a residential development named Maplewood Meadows, as well as other Rural Residential parcels to the north that may not be in Maplewood Meadows proper. It is reported that the immediate neighborhood consists of at least 17 homes and 10 undeveloped residential lots. 1 SEPA CHECKLIST Submittal: The Environmental Checklist was submitted to the Department of Community Development October 29, 2014. Staff determined the checklist to be substantially complete December 18, 2014. NOTICE Public Notice was published in the Port Townsend-Jefferson County Leader newspaper on December 24, 2014. Notice of the pending threshold determination was posted on the property by the applicant/representative on the 22"d of December, 2014. Notice was mailed to agencies and also to property owners within 300 feet of the property on December 23, 2014. COMMENTS Sixteen(16)comment letters were received from community members and five(5)comments from agencies, including Olympic Region Clean Air Agency,Department of Ecology,Washington State Department of Transportation,Jefferson County Public Works Department and Jefferson County Environmental Health Department. All comments were reviewed and sent to the applicant.The applicant provided clarifications regarding questions about the checklist information on January 26,2015. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMENTS Air Potential Impacts: air quality and odors. Analysis: Applicant will be permitted through Olympic Region Clean Air Agency(ORCAA)for Demolition Permit and Air Permit. Construction best management practices will be employed to control dust Facility design incorporates ventilation and filtration systems to meet or exceed compliance with all regulations set forth by ORCAA. Water Potential Impacts:contamination of Critical Aquifer Recharge Area,runoff from impervious surfaces, elevated groundwater and offsite damages Analysis: Applicant must meet Jefferson County Unified Development Code Sections 18.30.060 Grading and excavation standards, and 18.30.070 Stormwater Management Standards set for erosion and sedimentation control and stormwater management. The code adopts requirements set forth by the Washington Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. The proponent has submitted a Stormwater Site Plan, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan,and Impervious Surface Calculation Worksheet. Stormwater infiltration design is for 100% on-site. Based upon the requirement to develop and implement an approved Stormwater Site Plan, Public Works Department recommends finding that the proposal is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts related to erosion,sedimentation and stormwater runoff. 2 Environmental Health Potential Impacts:disposition of herbicides and process wastes,contamination of groundwater. Analysis: The marijuana cultivation process is not designed to produce runoff or nutrient entry to groundwater or septic system. Water from cultivation will not contribute to wastewater flows. The septic design estimates wastewater should not exceed typical household strength waste and recommends annual testing.Per WAC 314-55,Marijuana wastes from growing operations are required to be rendered unusable by mixing and grinding with at least 50%compost materials before disposal. The project will be utilizing offsite disposal for all solid waste from the growing operation. Aesthetics Potential Impacts: light pollution,noise,unsightly development Analysis: Applicant must comply with Jefferson County Unified Development Code standards for setbacks and screening(18.30.120). North and west property lines will have"Screen-A", 15-foot deep full screening landscaping that functions as a visual barrier between residential and nonresidential areas, with a 25-foot building setback. The south property line will have"Screen-B"landscaping 10-feet deep that functions as a filtered screen visual separator,to screen industrial use from a road,with a 20-foot building setback. The proposed 8-foot fence will be behind this landscape screening and largely be obscured. There will be no barbed wire,etc. on top of the fence. The fence will be of solid construction and will aid in noise attenuation. There are no plans to operate large machinery or heavy equipment during the operation of the facility. The principle exterior building material is to be metal siding. The abutting land uses of Light Industrial and Residential is mitigated through setback and screening requirements. Lighting must be installed in compliance with JCC 18.30.140. Exterior lighting shall not exceed 30 feet in height. All lighting fixtures shall be appropriate in scale,intensity, and height to the use they are serving. The peak of the tallest proposed structure will be 25 feet. Exterior lighting shall be energy- efficient and shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflections are contained within the boundaries of the parcel. Exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights-of-way.No lighting shall blink,flash,or be of unusually high intensity or brightness. Transportation Potential Impacts:Access at Fredericks Street& SR20, increased traffic volume/trips per day and intersection wait times,safety issues with pedestrians. Analysis: WSDOT has no concerns with this proposal,the facility will be a low traffic generator, and SR 20 at this location has mainline left turn channelization with illumination. Public Works Department finds that the proposal is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts to the County road system. Traffic generation of 6-10 vehicle trips per day is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers vehicular trip end definition and is based on a shift size of four(4)employees during normal business hours. Entry/exit from the site is located at the southwest corner of the property,providing additional sight distance and travel time before passing the crossroad of Louisa Street..Loading/unloading will occur on-site which will minimize impact to traffic flow on W.Fredericks Street. 3 EVALUATION OF PROPOSAL Consistency with other plans: The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan has designated this parcel as Light Industrial. The purpose of the Glen Cove Light Industrial district is to facilitate economic development and provide for a broad range of light industrial uses. The light industrial uses and activities associated with this district are intended to be compatible with the Glen Cove area. Potential indirect impacts of Light Industrial uses adjacent to Residential uses are recognized and addressed in Development Regulations of the Jefferson County Code. Mitigating measures for the development of this Light Industrial parcel are implemented by the application of development regulations and permit requirements. Adjacency of land uses of Light Industrial and Residential is mitigated through setback and screening requirements; and lighting and noise ordinances are codified in the development regulations. Trip generation does not increase significantly. Consideration of the short term and long term effects of the proposal,direct and indirect and cumulative impacts,the mitigating measures of the development regulations,the level of intensity of use of the Light Industrial parcel,the severity of potential impacts to the adjacent neighborhood,and the likelihood of occurrence of unmitigated impacts,the analysis does not find a reasonable likelihood for impacts that rise to the level of Probable Significant Adverse Environmental Impacts. DETERMINATION Determination of the SEPA Responsible Official: I have reviewed and considered the referenced proposal,the environmental checklist,public comments, and other available material,and determine that there is not a reasonable likelihood that the proposal will have probable significant adverse environmental impacts. I hereby issue a Determination of Non-Significance(DNS). Carl Smith,Director,Department of Community Development Date and SEPA Responsible Official 4 JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER CASE NO. MLA =00,0 y0 CERTIFICATION OF MAILING I make the following certification: I am competent to testify and make this certification based upon personal knowledge. On this .23 day of D Gtr , 2014, I deposited into the U.S.Mail with first class postage affixed,true and correct copies of 11 pfl ,L Ap pl italil byl yam. i- Leg_ 1QSQ, ��2iY`I� , '��°� P4 .11 SE_P' De .rm_� 9Jtor1— in the above matter, addressed to: Kiidjacent Property Owners: See attached list. (Notices Only) Agencies: See attached list. Interested Parties: See attached list.(fl one.- a4 3; r"-7;0 }0-., }0-., ,,,..-Applicant/Representative- Posting Packet: I set of laminating sheets with Notices, Posting Instruction,Affidavit, and a copy of Notice. Newspapers(Notices Only) Official Posting Places (x3) � :.tl(ma „ 1 a Iz9/2or y Other: I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing certification is true and correct. EXECUTED this29 day of biZ 4,1,‘ i r ,2014 at Port Townsend,Washington. OIL :LAC, 1 Deet G:\PLNCNTR\PLNCLERK\Forms&Form Language\FRM Certification of Mailing updated 01-2014.docx T 1 ck- rnr� ZON14-00045 ZON14-00045 MARC HILT EVERETT A SORENSEN PE PO BOX 1909 715 GRANT STREET 192 W FREDERICKS ST PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368-2405 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368-0062 ZON14-00045 ZON14-00045 SIMON LITTLE CITY OF PT FIRE DEPARTMENT 210 N VICTORY AVE ATTN:TOM AUMOCK PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 1256 LAWRENCE ST PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 ZON14-00045 ZON14-00045 CITY OF PT PUBLIC WORKS JCFPD#6 DAVE PETERSEN E JEFFERSON FIRE RESCUE 5210 KUHN ST. 1256 LAWRENCE ST PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 ZON 14-00045 ZON 14-00045 OLYMPIC REGION CLEAN AIR AGENCY PT GAMBLE S'KLALLAMTRIBE SEPA REVIEW STAFF 31974 LITTLE BOSTON RD. 2940-B LIMITED LANE NW KINGSTON, WA 98346 OLYMPIA,WA 98502 ZON14-00045 ZON 14-00045 *CITY OF PT-SEPA RESP OFFICIAL *JEFFERSON CO PUBLIC WORKS 250 MADISON ST, STE 3 ERIC KUZMA PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 ZON 14-00045 ZON 14-00045 *JEFFERSON CO PUD#1 *ORCAA-SEPA DIVISION ATTN: BILL GRAHAM GEOFFREY GLASS PO BOX 929 2940-B LIMITED LANE NW PORT HADLOCK, WA 98339 OLYMPIA, WA 98502 ZON14-00045 ZON14-00045 *JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFF *PENINSULA DAILY NEWS ATTN: PAUL BECKER ANIMAL SERV CHARLIE BERMANT 1939E SIMS WAY PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 ZON14-00045 ZON14-00045 *POINT NO POINT TREATY COUNCIL *PORT OF PORT TOWNSEND JACKIE MCLAUGHLIN PO BOX 1180 7999 NE SALISH LANE PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 KINGSTON,WA 98346 ZON14-00045 ZON14-00045 *PORT TOWNSEND LEADER *PORT TOWNSEND SD#50 TRISTAN HIEGLER 1610 BLAINE ST PO BOX 552 PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368-6405 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 ZON14-00045 ZON14-00045 *SKOKOMISH TRIBE *SUQUAMISH TRIBE KRIS MILLER ALISON O'SULLIVAN 80 N TRIBAL CENTER RD PO BOX 498 SKOKOMISH,WA 98584 SUQUAMISH, WA 98392 948602701 948601701 LELAND BARLOW MICHAEL HOY 40 VANCOUVER DR 337 SHERMAN ST PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368-8915 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368-3047 948602702 986702908 LLOYD BELVILL LARRY HUTTON REGINA BELVILL JTWROS PO BOX 989 2023 E SIMS WAY PMB 342 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368-0007 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368-6905 948602806 986703110 AARON D EADES JOHN &JOANNE MACKEY C/O LTCOL KIMBERLY M DEVORE 121 REYNOLDS RD 9116 LIZZARD ROCK TR PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368-8847 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80924 948601401 948601603 DAVID EMMETT FRED KIMBALL PO BOX 2083 560 57TH ST PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368-0259 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368-1326 948601301 948601609 CHRISTOPHER M GRACE ELSIE KIMBALL TRUSTEE 507 TAFT ST ELSIE E KIMBALL TRUSTEE PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368-4437 2210 SEAVIEW DR PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368-1011 948601602 948601507 ROBERT E GRUYE STEVE LARKIN PO BOX 761 2602 PARK ST PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368-0761 BELLINGHAM,WA 98225-2337 948600102 986704004 GERALD D HILSON HENG LAN LAU KARMET G HILSON PO BOX 184 UNDIVIDED 1/2 INT EACH MONTERAY, CA 93940-0184 EVERETT, WA 98203-1318 948601601 948601203 DAVID H LESSER SAINT JAMES PLACE TRUST MARION I LODWICK JOHN C NESSET TRUSTEE PO BOX 1496 PO BOX 214 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368-0044 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368-0214 948600201 948600302 LIVING LI SUSAN G VANCE 291 W HORTON ST 14801 AMY CT PORT HADLOCK, WA 98339-9639 SOUTH CHESTERFIEL,VA 23834 948601201 948601202 MARVIN GARDEN TRUST VENTNOR AVE TRUST JOHN C NESSET TRUSTEE JOHN C NESSET TRUSTEE PO BOX 214 PO BOX 214 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368-0214 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368-0214 986704201 948601502 MARJORIE M MINER VERNON I GARRISON LLC PO BOX 42 1430 QUINCY ST BARNSTEAD, NH 03218-0042 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368-5324 948601702 948600101 RANDY J POWERS LAURA WILSON RENITA R POWERS 1000 CORDOVA PL#398 2265 S DISCOVERY RD SANTA FE, NM 87505-1725 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368-9635 948601504 JAMES H PRINCE 220 LINCOLN ST PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368-4515 948600204 MICHAEL P REGAN 291 W HORTON ST PORT HADLOCK, WA 98339-9639 - ir ' A ,A. o i -e (I' 1 ie N,‘. AN AD 4\14 %44:. rA 4 &6' . § I 4: „ie_ 2 a qz, - c6P X-144- - °L -2) LI`dz .--- • ‘4-, a 4:4 --t ,., %) ezo Q) $ P '71 *1 t) / - 14-4" 19-% 1 /4 4 i ' 1 t. .92. - , - a .. t ... "A Iti r. a c ,. 11_,_ zi., gyp,' ,� .t. • ' : . , 6., 4 I i .� .14 -.. $ -t 1ij A I I f s Q E Fie Flt Vin Fsebrh Ina Lhritm Ceprocsiy Cwbare Windows Help D Ett Q® -'., x 01 ru ...12039 .._ .. . UI: mai mom }E W,i[]0 :e.: tw 6- m1It •, XI�'N6A - Nile Tel. Contents 9 x -. ,--�-_.. rroma I I MAX. I 1 rxsP ...1, �t�!"SA s:: l wMOe noetoss''. ... l _ ..v 01 Id tarns I -- T - u®Fuller ' tom roam m 11111101101 em 1 roam_ £ Ell 6®® i ramp .. f 1row' pelt 1 rAM1P I�_I- pemhrse smss9st .�IRI Parcels I. err 1 a_____ _ ! n l 4.070,20,ms _seroewl rnsa — 0.4 No 10I rarer a tela amt 'east }tut+ r- IIO+M00 rerwaos�°f I > & I r.lwtse .07.0 . > e �ff ' r+aaM f MAIM -' �— u. �.- i__ WON,0 * Maim 8.11.10020 t Mem' summa ° Wmmpl YMgP 9iFmtml 9,600"0, 1 m+fit MOM y _nYCt]01 . — %mac-. m+W 98 + - 10031001i aym e�tln M --- ' _I 11Ut BYm12+ Pew= 1 -- — m "'t9� MMp I I 1174101 ���1i�Fm+t0] s4COt9a 9t$Ctt MMrT —l_.. 407 SOW eaV.'Bbm%m9 Ym, oWml'Nt ' MW+yr 9401110o (rJ(fr !420011, 4A01+mFmmR'21 xm 1 Mr11 Mt0011W BInCn 903E w 4bux5 M4Y:'. FROM, prMta Ma+W �, ABm+ml9,9m1mCy9m.1c, 90401701 9Y14110/61 maMt]C'! •"-" �YMOO+CW 9+2m1m0 Mona —I— , oubr'm -r--_..—J MelYtl MIMaa 800090C 91.6n.:732 - m XI suM r M62,3 Mase rdm � rMY Masa Mem*3 MMe:^o ..._Memo Mesemm moat. I QII o a e r _ __.. _... 1I5/155142 403318.793 Feet AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING PUBLIC NOTICE JEFFERSON COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ORDINANCE#03-0702-01 State of Washington) County of Jefferson) I, Vics-c.` t c . . r— , being duly sworn of oath say that I have posted one(1) public notice poster on or near the site identified in the following development description: PROPOSAL: DEVELOPMENT OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARCEL FOR COMMERCIAL AGRICULTURE, STORMWATER PERMIT WITH SEPA-- Dream City, LLC proposes to develop a zoned Light Industrial parcel for marijuana production at 192 W. Fredericks Street, Parcel 948601301. Phase 1 includes remodeling existing 2,592 sf building, dismantling 576 sf car port, adding 7,000 sf insulated metal building and making stormwater improvements. Phase 2 includes additional 7,000 sf building and three greenhouses totalling 22,638 sf; and addition of fire access lane. The project requires a stormwater permit, building permits, septic review and SEPA review for all phases. This notice was posted in full compliance with UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE on: the 2 -a_. day of'b. {, t r 2014. (Signature of person posting notice) Subscribed and sworn to before me on this a3—"( day of D- .c.t (06t. 2014. Acknowledgement: Notary Pu i and for the State of Washington, Notary Public I' residing inv�Drf //aa'/otGL , Washington. I State of Washington My commission expires: U‘,/y i y� 20/5- 1 MARY JO NOBLE My Appointment Expires Jul 14, 2015 NOTARY STAMP MLA Number: MLA14-00090 Proponent(s): MARC HILT \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_NtcAppl4_APO_U.rpt 12/18/2014 Please publish one time. PUBLISH DATE: December 24, 2014 BILL: Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 Account No. 15833 JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE I LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA14-00090 APPLICANT: MARC HILT PO BOX 1909 192 W FREDERICKS ST PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368-0062 Application Received Date: October 30, 2014 Application Complete Date: December 18, 2014 Application Notice Date: December 24, 2014 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 192 W FREDERICKS ST EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13, LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN VAC ALLEY, SOPHIA ST, & SNAC ELWOOD ST ADJ PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: DEVELOPMENT OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARCEL FOR COMMERCIAL AGRICULTURE, STORMWATER PERMIT WITH SEPA -- Dream City, LLC proposes to develop a zoned Light Industrial parcel for marijuana production at 192 W. Fredericks Street, Parcel 948601301. Phase 1 includes remodeling existing 2,592 sf building, dismantling 576 sf car port, adding 7,000 sf insulated metal building and making stormwater improvements. Phase 2 includes additional 7,000 sf building and three greenhouses totalling 22,638 sf; and addition of fire access lane. The project requires a stormwater permit, building permits, septic review and SEPA review for all phases. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on January 7, 2015. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The Department expects to issue a DNS for this proposal. If the proposal is approved, policies and performance standards found in the Jefferson County Code and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan will be used to form permit conditions \\tidemark\data\forms\F_MLT_NtcAppl4_Pub_U.rpt 12/18/2014 intended to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Additional conditions or mitigation measures may be required under SEPA. Project Planner: Joel Peterson, 360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community Development web page at www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ \\tidemarkldata Worms 1F_M LT_NtcAppl 4_P ub_U.rpt 12/18/2014 Please publish one time. PUBLISH DATE: December 24, 2014 BILL: Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE I LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA14-00090 APPLICANT: MARC HILT PO BOX 1909 192 W FREDERICKS ST PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368-0062 Application Received Date: October 30, 2014 Application Complete Date: December 18, 2014 Application Notice Date: December 24, 2014 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 192 W FREDERICKS ST EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13, LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN VAC ALLEY, SOPHIA ST, & SNAC ELWOOD ST ADJ PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: DEVELOPMENT OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARCEL FOR COMMERCIAL AGRICULTURE, STORMWATER PERMIT WITH SEPA-- Dream City, LLC proposes to develop a zoned Light Industrial parcel for marijuana production at 192 W. Fredericks Street, Parcel 948601301. Phase 1 includes remodeling existing 2,592 sf building, dismantling 576 sf car port, adding 7,000 sf insulated metal building and making stormwater improvements. Phase 2 includes additional 7,000 sf building and three greenhouses totalling 22,638 sf; and addition of fire access lane. The project requires a stormwater permit, building permits, septic review and SEPA review for all phases. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on January 7, 2015. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The Department expects to issue a DNS for this proposal. If the proposal is approved, policies and performance standards found in the Jefferson County Code and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan will be used to form permit conditions intended to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Additional conditions or mitigation measures may be required under SEPA. Project Planner: Joel Peterson, 360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community Development web page at www.co.]efferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ \\tidemark\data\forms\F MLT NtcAppl4 Pub_U.rpt 12/18/2014 Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 379-4450 POSTING INSTRUCTIONS Please post the attached notice on a 2-foot by 3-foot board provided by this department in a conspicuous location visible to vehicle traffic and pedestrians on or reasonably near the proposed development by December 24, 2014. The clear adhesive paper can be put over the notice after you mount it to protect it from the elements. Additional notice boards may be required where the site does not abut a public road, for a large site that abuts more than one (1) public road, or the Administrator determines that additional notice boards are necessary to provide adequate public notice. Notice boards shall be maintained in good and legible condition by the applicant during the notice period, be in place at least fifteen (15) calendar days prior to the date of the hearing, and be removed within fifteen (15) calendar days after the end of the notice period. Complete the affidavit, have it notarized, and return it to this office within three (3) days of posting. If the affidavit is not filed as required, any scheduled hearing or date by which the public may comment on the application will be postponed in order to allow compliance with this notice requirement. If you have any questions, please contact this office at (360) 379-4450. MLA number: MLA14-00090 Proponent(s): MARC HILT Ad ID: 136704 Pre-Bill �3Le 1Ceaher 226 Adams Street• Port Townsend,WA 98368 • 360-385-2900 Bill to: Sold to: Account ID: 15833 Jodi Adams Joel Peterson JeffCo Dept of Community Development JeffCo Dept of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Please pay from this Pre-Bill. Return stub with payment Rep ID: KB Terms: Net 30 Description Classification of Ad: 460—County Notices Zone:A PO: MLA14-00090 Text: JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE I LAND USE APPLI... Charges from 12/24/2014 to 12/24/2014 Date Pub Type Description Price Discount Applied Due 12/24/14 PTL ad LEGALS: JEFFERSON COUNTY - $80.00 $80.00 $80.00 $80.00 Please return this portion with your payment. Pre-Bill Remit Payment to: Port Townsend Leader Amount Due $80.00 226 Adams Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone: 360-385-2900 Fax: 360-385-3422 Amount Enclosed Issue Date: 12/24/2014 Jodi Adams Prebill Date: 12/26/2014 JeffCo Dept of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Ad # 136704 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Account# 15833 JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE I LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA14-00090 APPLICANT: MARC HILT PO BOX 1909 192 W FREDERICKS ST PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368-0062 Application Received Date: October 30, 2014 Application Complete Date: December 18, 2014 Application Notice Date: December 24, 2014 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 192 W FREDERICKS ST EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13, LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN VAC ALLEY, SOPHIA ST, & SNAC ELWOOD ST ADJ PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: DEVELOPMENT OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARCEL FOR COMMERCIAL AGRICULTURE, STORMWATER PERMIT WITH SEPA -- Dream City, LLC proposes to develop a zoned Light Industrial parcel for marijuana production at 192 W. Fredericks Street, Parcel 948601301. Phase 1 includes remodeling existing 2,592 sf building, dismantling 576 sf car port, adding 7,000 sf insulated metal building and making stormwater improvements. Phase 2 includes additional 7,000 sf building and three greenhouses totalling 22,638 sf; and addition of fire access lane. The project requires a stormwater permit, building permits, septic review and SEPA review for all phases. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on January 7, 2015. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION AND PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable development regulations, and the project review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an EIS is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold (final) determination may be obtained upon request, and will be mailed to any person commenting upon the notice of application. The SEPA Official has determined that: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The Department expects to issue a DNS for this proposal. If the proposal is approved, policies and performance standards found in the Jefferson County Code and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan will be used to form permit conditions intended to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Additional conditions or mitigation measures may be required under SEPA. This will be the only opportunity to make comments related to SEPA. There will not be another comment period after the threshold (final) SEPA determination is made. In addition, since this is a Type I permit application, the threshold determination cannot be appealed except to Superior Court. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: This is a Type I Permit Application and there will be no public hearings. APPEALS: Appeals of SEPA decisions are described above in the SEPA Information and Preliminary Determination section. The final permit decision for this Type I permit application will be made by the Administrator. The decision cannot be appealed except to Superior Court. Project Planner: Joel Peterson, 360-379-4450 For further information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Community Development web page at www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE I LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA14-00090 APPLICANT: MARC HILT PO BOX 1909 192 W FREDERICKS ST PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368-0062 Application Received Date: October 30, 2014 Application Complete Date: December 18, 2014 Application Notice Date: December 24, 2014 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 192 W FREDERICKS ST EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13, LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN VAC ALLEY, SOPHIA ST, & SNAC ELWOOD ST ADJ PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: DEVELOPMENT OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARCEL FOR COMMERCIAL AGRICULTURE, STORMWATER PERMIT WITH SEPA-- Dream City, LLC proposes to develop a zoned Light Industrial parcel for marijuana production at 192 W. Fredericks Street, Parcel 948601301. Phase 1 includes remodeling existing 2,592 sf building, dismantling 576 sf car port, adding 7,000 sf insulated metal building and making stormwater improvements. Phase 2 includes additional 7,000 sf building and three greenhouses totalling 22,638 sf; and addition of fire access lane. The project requires a stormwater permit, building permits, septic review and SEPA review for all phases. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community Development. All interested persons are invited to (a) comment on the application; (b) receive notice of and participate in any hearings; and (c) receive a copy of the decision by submitting such written comment(s)/request(s) to the Jefferson County Department of Community Development, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, (360) 379-4450. Comments concerning this application should be submitted to the Department by 4:30 p.m. on January 7, 2015. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday, then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday. Comments submitted after this date may not be considered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION AND PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable development regulations, and the project review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures regardless of whether an EIS is prepared. A copy of the subsequent threshold (final) determination may be obtained upon request, and will be mailed to any person commenting upon the notice of application. The SEPA Official has determined that: The optional DNS process of WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposal. The Department expects to issue a DNS for this proposal. If the proposal is approved, policies and performance standards found in the Jefferson County Code and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan will be used to form permit conditions intended to mitigate adverse environmental impacts. Additional conditions or mitigation measures may be required under SEPA. This will be the only opportunity to make comments related to SEPA. There will not be another comment period after the threshold (final) SEPA determination is made. In addition, since this is a Type I permit application, the threshold determination cannot be appealed except to Superior Court. PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION: This is a Type I Permit Application and there will be no public hearings. The final permit decision for this Type I permit application will be made by the Administrator. The decision cannot be appealed except to Superior Court. Ad ID: 136704 ba ' Pre-Bill it 4 ' 1The tender 226 Adams Street • Port Townsend, WA 98368 • 360-385-2900 Bill to: Sold to: Account ID: 15833 Jodi Adams Joel Peterson JeffCo Dept of Community Development JeffCo Dept of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Please pay from this Pre-Bill. Return stub with payment Rep ID: KB Terms: Net 30 Description Classification of Ad: 460— County Notices Zone: A PO: MLA14-00090 Text: JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE I LAND USE APPLI... Charges from 12/24/2014 to 12/24/2014 Date Pub Type Description Price Discount Applied Due 12/24/14 PTL ad LEGALS: JEFFERSON COUNTY - $80.00 -$80.00 $0.00 $80.00 -$80.00 $0.00 � ,-- JAN 2 9 20'r Please return this portion with your payment. Pre-Bill Remit Payment to: Port Townsend Leader Amount Due $0.00 226 Adams Street . Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone: 360-385-2900 Fax: 360-385-3422 Amount Enclosed Issue Date: 12/24/2014 Jodi Adams Prebill Date: 1/27/2015 JeffCo Dept of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Ad # 136704 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Account# 15833 Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON) SS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON) I, Donna J. Rosmaier, an employee of the Port Townsend & Jefferson County Leader, a weekly newspaper which has been established, pub- lished in the English language and circulated continuously as a weekly newspaper in the town of Port Townsend in said County and State, and for general circulation in said county for more than six (6) months prior to the date of first publication of the Notice hereto attached and that the said Port Townsend & Jefferson County Leader was on the 27th day of June 1941 approved as a legal newspaper by the Superior Court of said Jefferson County and annexed is a true copy of the Ad # ‘3010 Li SEE ATTACHED NEWSPAPER CLIPPING As it appeared in the regular and entire issue of said paper itself not in a supplement thereof for a period of t weeki, beginning on the Li day of `Def bei , 2014, ending on the G14 day of 17. e I.e - be'(, 2014, that said newspaper was regularly distributed to their subscribers during all of this period. That the full amount of $ go.(Y) has been paid in full, at the rate of $8.00 per column inch for each insertion. Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1 day of 52015. _(34„.„..;„. C,,,,fiv.,%,,, yq� F,9nna J. Rosmaier Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. Residing at Port Townsend. etot PM.'was w ' a,e ��9rFOF W pg�`�b V JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC NOTICE OF TYPE I LAND USE APPLICATION AND PENDING SEPA DETERMINATION MLA14 00090 APPLICANT: MARC HILT PO BOX 1909 192 W FREDERICKS ST PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368 0062 Application Received Dale: October 80,2014 t oplication Complete Date: December 18,2014 Application Notice Date: December 24,2014 SITE ADDRESS AND PROJECT LOCATION: 192 W FREDERICKS ST EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13,LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN VAC ALLEY,SOPHIA ST, &SNAG ELWOOD ST ADJ PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND REQUIRED PERMITS/STUDIES: DEVELOPMENT OF LIGHT INDUS- TRIAL PARCEL FOR COMMERCIAL AG- RICULTURE, STORMWATER PERMIT WITH SEPA Dream City,LLC proposes to develop a zoned Light Industrial parcel for marijuana production at 192 W.Fredericks Street,Parcel 948801301. Phase 1 includes remodeling existing 2,592 of building,dis- mantling 576 sl car port,adding 7,000 sf insu- lated metal building and making stormwater improvements. Phase 2 includes additional 7,000 sf building and three greenhouses to- taling 22,638 sf;and addition o1 fire access lane.The project requires a slormwaler per- mit building permits,septic review and SEPA review considering all phases. COMMENT PERIOD AND WHERE TO VIEW DOCUMENTS: The application and any studies may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Depart- ment of Community Development. AI inter- ested persons are invited to(a)comment on the application;(b)receive notice of and parlicpate in any hearings;and(c)receive a copy of the decision by submitting such writ- ten commenl(swrequest(s)to the Jefferson County Department of Community Develop- ment, Development Review Division, 621 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98358, (360)379 4450. Comments concerning Ihls application should he submitted to the De- partment by 4:30 p.m.on January 7,2015. If the last day of the comment period falls on a weekend or holiday,then the comment period shall be extended to the first working day after the weekend or holiday.Comments submitted atter this date may not be consid- ered in the staff report. SEPA INFORMATION: The optional DNS process of WAC 197 11 355 is being used. This may he the only opportunity to comment on the environmen- tal impacts of the proposal. The Department expects to issue a DNS for this proposal. If the proposal is approved,policies and per- formance standards found in the Jefferson County Code and the Jefferson County Com- prehensive Plan wit be used to form permit conditions intended to mitigate adverse envi- ronmental impacts. Additional conditions or mitigation measures may be required under SE PA. Project Planner: Joel Peterson, 380 379 4450 For further Information, please visit the Jefferson County Department of Com- munity Development web page at www, co,jetterson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ 136704 12/24 Joel Peterson From: Legals-Donna <legals@ptleader.com> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 4:51 PM To: Joel Peterson Subject: Re: Another Jeff Co Legal Notice for Dec. 24 Publication MLA14-90 Attachments: JeffCo D Quote - 136704.pdf; ATT00001.htm; 136704.pdf; ATT00002.htm Hello, Attached you'll find our quote and a proof for the notice you submitted for publication with the Leader. **PLEASE DO NOT PAY FROM THIS QUOTE** You will receive a notice showing the actual amount once the ad is measured. Please review both attachments and make sure they meet with your approval. Also please let us know if you have any questions or concerns regarding the publication of your legal notice. As always, thank you for your business. We strive to serve our customers and their publication needs with the utmost care and professionalism. Leader Readers are everywhere! 70 percent of north Jefferson County homes are Leader Readers... 17,500 locals each week... 23,000 people use PTLeader.com each week. Kaye Bailey Donna Rosmaier Classified Department Manager Legal Ad Coordinator Memorial Coordinator The Leader 360-385-2900 1 Joel Peterson From: Legals-Donna <legals@ptleader.com> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 4:25 PM To: Joel Peterson Subject: Re: Another Jeff Co Legal Notice for Dec. 24 Publication MLA14-90 Joel, Your legal publication request has been received. Should we have further questions of the submission we'll contactyou to clarifythem prior to the regarding the specifics u first publish date. Any correction or change requests need to be made by our deadline for that specific issue. We publish on Wednesdays and the standard deadline is 1:00 pm on the Monday prior, unless a holiday necessitates an earlier deadline. Those under a specific publication contract, your dates and times will follow those contract guidelines. We are setting the referenced ad for publication on the dates requested, however we will only be able to provide an estimate of costs until the notice has actually published and been measured. Generally our estimates will give you a figure very close to the actual cost. Cost is determined by the length and type of notice to be published. The 2014 rate for public and legal notices with the Leader will be $14.00 per column inch. Special rates apply to specific agencies under contract with the Leader. Important Note: Affidavits are issued only after full payment has been received. After the notice is first published and measured you will be sent a Pre-bill to assist you with your payment for our services and publication of the notice. As always, thank you for your business. We strive to serve our customers and their publication needs with the utmost care and professionalism. Thank you and have a wonderful day, Kaye Bailey for Donna Rosmaier Legal Coordinator 1 The Leader 226 Adams St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360)385-2900 ledals@otleader.com On Dec 18, 2014, at 4:02 PM, Joel Peterson<JPeterson(a�co.jefferson.wa.us> wrote: Legal Notices: Please publish the attached document"MLA14-00090noa" in the Wednesday, December 24th edition of the Leader. Please confirm by reply email that the legal notice will run in the December 24th edition. Thanks. Please contact me by tomorrow if you have any questions. I will be out of the office Dec 22-26. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson(a7co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW bipl SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary <MLA14-00090NOA.rtf> 2 e�¢s°N coG JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT locligt.„ 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.iefferson.wa.uslcommunitydevelopment 9ge NGq° Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax: 360.379.4451 I Email:dcdaco.iefferson.wa.us SquareONE Resource Center I Building Permits & Inspections i Development Review I Long Range Planning FINAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE AND LEAD AGENCY STATUS DATE: February 12,2015 PROPONENTS: Dream City, LLC 192 W. Fredericks Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 PROPOSAL: The project is to develop a Light Industrial parcel on the western side of the Glen Cove Light Industrial District for a marijuana production facility. Phase 1 includes remodeling an existing 2,592 s.f. building, dismantling a 576 s.f. carport, adding a 7,000 s.f. insulated metal building and making stormwater improvements. Phase 2 includes an additional 7,000 s.f. building and three greenhouses totaling 22,638 s.f., and the addition of a fire access lane. PROPERTY LOCATION: 192 W.Fredericks Street,Port Townsend LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 948601301,EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13,LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN VAC ALLEY, SOPHIA ST. & SNAC ELWOOD ST ADJ NOTICE OF LEAD AGENCY: Jefferson County has determined that it is the lead agency for the above- described proposal. NOTICE OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE: Jefferson County has determined that the above described proposal, conducted in conformance with the applicable Jefferson County Codes and Ordinances, would not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2Xc). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the Jefferson County Development Review Division. COMMENT PERIOD: This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. Jefferson County has considered comments on its preliminary determination of nonsignificance. There is no further comment period on the DNS. APPEAL: There is no Administrative Appeal process under the Jefferson County Code for Type I permit decisions as specified by JCC 18.40.260 and JCC 18.40.810(1). Appeal of a Type I permit requires Judicial Appeal as specified by Section 18.40.340 of the JCC. 24 3/20/5— Carl Smith, SEPA Responsible Official Date MEMORANDUM TO: Carl Smith, SEPA Responsible Official FROM: Joel Peterson, Associate Planner DATE: February 11,2015 SUBJECT: Analysis for Threshold Determination under the rules of the State Environmental Policy Act(WAC 197-11) Proponent: Marc Hilt Dream City, LLC 192 W. Fredericks Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Representative: Simon Little/ Studio STL Application: MLA 14-00090/ZON 14-00045 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Proposal: The project is to develop a Light Industrial parcel on the western side of the Glen Cove Light Industrial District for a marijuana production facility. Phase 1 includes remodeling an existing 2,592 s.f. building,dismantling a 576 s.f. carport, adding a 7,000 s.f. insulated metal building and making stormwater improvements. Phase 2 includes an additional 7,000 s.f. building and three greenhouses totaling 22,638 s.f., and the addition of a fire access lane. Property Location: 192 W. Fredericks Street, Port Townsend Legal Description: Parcel 948601301, EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13,LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN VAC ALLEY, SOPHIA ST. & S/VAC ELWOOD ST ADJ Site Conditions: The parcel is just under two acres and is mostly wooded with regrowth. The site has an existing garage/shop and carport. The parcel includes vacated portions of Sophia Street to the west, vacated portion of Elwood Street to the north, and vacated portion of Louisa Street to the east. Access to the parcel is from West Fredericks Street on the right,past Louisa Street on the left. The site has sloping topography which will be levelled in preparation for development. Surrounding Area: The parcel is in the portion of Glen Cove that extends west of State Route 19. This extension includes properties north of West Fredericks Street zoned Light Industrial, and south of West Fredericks Street zoned Light Industrial/Commercial. The Glen Cove Light Industrial District is surrounded by residential parcels, primarily Rural Residential 1:5. The subject parcel is on the extreme western extent of the Glen Cove Light Industrial District and abuts a residential development named Maplewood Meadows, as well as other Rural Residential parcels to the north that may not be in Maplewood Meadows proper. It is reported that the immediate neighborhood consists of at least 17 homes and 10 undeveloped residential lots. 1 SEPA CHECKLIST Submittal: The Environmental Checklist was submitted to the Department of Community Development October 29, 2014. Staff determined the checklist to be substantially complete December 18,2014. NOTICE Public Notice was published in the Port Townsend-Jefferson County Leader newspaper on December 24, 2014. Notice of the pending threshold determination was posted on the property by the applicant/representative on the 22'd of December,2014. Notice was mailed to agencies and also to property owners within 300 feet of the property on December 23,2014. COMMENTS Sixteen(16)comment letters were received from community members and five(5)comments from agencies, including Olympic Region Clean Air Agency, Department of Ecology, Washington State Department of Transportation,Jefferson County Public Works Department and Jefferson County Environmental Health Department. All comments were reviewed and sent to the applicant. The applicant provided clarifications regarding questions about the checklist information on January 26,2015. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMENTS Air Potential Impacts: air quality and odors. Analysis: Applicant will be permitted through Olympic Region Clean Air Agency(ORCAA)for Demolition Permit and Air Permit. Construction best management practices will be employed to control dust.Facility design incorporates ventilation and filtration systems to meet or exceed compliance with all regulations set forth by ORCAA. Water Potential Impacts:contamination of Critical Aquifer Recharge Area,runoff from impervious surfaces, elevated groundwater and offsite damages Analysis: Applicant must meet Jefferson County Unified Development Code Sections 18.30.060 Grading and excavation standards, and 18.30.070 Stormwater Management Standards set for erosion and sedimentation control and stormwater management. The code adopts requirements set forth by the Washington Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. The proponent has submitted a Stormwater Site Plan, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, and Impervious Surface Calculation Worksheet. Stormwater infiltration design is for 100%on-site. Based upon the requirement to develop and implement an approved Stormwater Site Plan,Public Works Department recommends finding that the proposal is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts related to erosion, sedimentation and stormwater runoff. 2 Environmental Health Potential Impacts: disposition of herbicides and process wastes,contamination of groundwater. Analysis: The marijuana cultivation process is not designed to produce runoff or nutrient entry to groundwater or septic system. Water from cultivation will not contribute to wastewater flows. The septic design estimates wastewater should not exceed typical household strength waste and recommends annual testing. Per WAC 314-55, Marijuana wastes from growing operations are required to be rendered unusable by mixing and grinding with at least 50%compost materials before disposal. The project will be utilizing offsite disposal for all solid waste from the growing operation. Aesthetics Potential Impacts: light pollution,noise,unsightly development Analysis: Applicant must comply with Jefferson County Unified Development Code standards for setbacks and screening(18.30.120). North and west property lines will have"Screen-A", 15-foot deep full screening landscaping that functions as a visual barrier between residential and nonresidential areas, with a 25-foot building setback. The south property line will have"Screen-B" landscaping 10-feet deep that functions as a filtered screen visual separator,to screen industrial use from a road,with a 20-foot building setback. The proposed 8-foot fence will be behind this landscape screening and largely be obscured. There will be no barbed wire, etc. on top of the fence. The fence will be of solid construction and will aid in noise attenuation. There are no plans to operate large machinery or heavy equipment during the operation of the facility. The principle exterior building material is to be metal siding. The abutting land uses of Light Industrial and Residential is mitigated through setback and screening requirements. Lighting must be installed in compliance with JCC 18.30.140. Exterior lighting shall not exceed 30 feet in height. All lighting fixtures shall be appropriate in scale, intensity, and height to the use they are serving. The peak of the tallest proposed structure will be 25 feet. Exterior lighting shall be energy- efficient and shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflections are contained within the boundaries of the parcel. Exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights-of-way.No lighting shall blink, flash,or be of unusually high intensity or brightness. Transportation Potential Impacts: Access at Fredericks Street& SR20, increased traffic volume/trips per day and intersection wait times, safety issues with pedestrians. Analysis: WSDOT has no concerns with this proposal,the facility will be a low traffic generator, and SR 20 at this location has mainline left turn channelization with illumination. Public Works Department finds that the proposal is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts to the County road system. Traffic generation of 6-10 vehicle trips per day is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers vehicular trip end definition and is based on a shift size of four(4)employees during normal business hours. Entry/exit from the site is located at the southwest corner of the property,providing additional sight distance and travel time before passing the crossroad of Louisa Street. Loading/unloading will occur on-site which will minimize impact to traffic flow on W. Fredericks Street. 3 EVALUATION OF PROPOSAL Consistency with other plans: The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan has designated this parcel as Light Industrial. The purpose of the Glen Cove Light Industrial district is to facilitate economic development and provide for a broad range of light industrial uses. The light industrial uses and activities associated with this district are intended to be compatible with the Glen Cove area. Potential indirect impacts of Light Industrial uses adjacent to Residential uses are recognized and addressed in Development Regulations of the Jefferson County Code. Mitigating measures for the development of this Light Industrial parcel are implemented by the application of development regulations and permit requirements. Adjacency of land uses of Light Industrial and Residential is mitigated through setback and screening requirements; and lighting and noise ordinances are codified in the development regulations. Trip generation does not increase significantly. Consideration of the short term and long term effects of the proposal, direct and indirect and cumulative impacts,the mitigating measures of the development regulations,the level of intensity of use of the Light Industrial parcel,the severity of potential impacts to the adjacent neighborhood, and the likelihood of occurrence of unmitigated impacts,the analysis does not find a reasonable likelihood for impacts that rise to the level of Probable Significant Adverse Environmental Impacts. DETERMINATION Determination of the SEPA Responsible Official: I have reviewed and considered the referenced proposal,the environmental checklist,public comments, and other available material, and determine that there is not a reasonable likelihood that the proposal will have probable significant adverse environmental impacts. I hereby issue a Determination of Non-Significance(DNS). 2�f j/2ols— Carl Smith,Director, Department of Community Development Date and SEPA Responsible Official 4 it j;�\ r iIc_ n SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST I � OCT 2 9 2014 ;i - FoRCGUNTY OF CliMf IUNITY DEVELOPMENT DREAM CITY LLC PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT OF 192 W. FREDERICKS STREET; PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 PREPARED BY EVERETT A. SORENSEN, P.E. STREAMLINE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 715 GRANT STREET; PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 A. background 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Dream City, LLC 192 W. Fredericks Street 2. Name of applicant: Dream City, LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 192 W. Fredericks Street, Marc Hilt (360-531-0804) and Dominic Morrison (360-821-8616) 4. Date checklist prepared: October 29, 2014 5. Agency requesting checklist: Jefferson County Department of Community Development 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Phase 1 Task 1: Temp Erosion & Sedimentation Control and Land clearing & grading: As soon as possible Task 2. Construction of metal building and remodel of existing building: After obtaining building permit, late 2014 to early 2015 Phase 2 Task 1: Obtain 30 ft strip of vacated adjacent Louisa Street right-of-way Task 2: Construct a second metal building and three greenhouses, one of which would extend into vacated ROW. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. The proposed development includes all planned improvements. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 1 Of 12 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 1. A Soil Evaluation was conducted for the 2002 Septic Permit. 2. A Drainage Analysis was conducted by Streamline Environmental, Inc., in September & October 2014. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Temporary Erosion & Sedimentation Control Plan Engineered Stormwater Management Plan Building Permit Applications 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) The Applicant proposes to construct two 7,000 square foot (SF) metal buildings and greenhouse totaling approximately 22,000 SF. The existing driveway and parking area will be expanded to accommodate 14 vehicles. An existing carport will be dismantled. Dream City, LLC, plans to obtain a state license to grow cannabis, which would be packaged and bar-coded in this facility prior to shipment. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project site is Jefferson County Assessor's Parcel Number 948601301, located at 192 W. Fredericks Street, Port Townsend, Washington (Township 30N, Range 1W, Sectionl6, Southwest Quarter Section). A Site Vicinity Map with 6 ft LIDAR imagery and Site Plan with Existing Conditions are attached. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 2 of 12 a. General description of the site: Gently Sloped. b. What is the steepest slope on the site? Typical slopes vary from 0 to 4%, with a maximum of approximately 6%. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Soils at the subject site are generally sandy and well-drained. The USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRSC) lists two predominant soil types for the site vicinity: HuC, which indicates Hoypus gravelly loamy sand, and CfD, which indicates Cassolary sandy loam. HuC soils are typically highly permeable and well-drained. CfD soils are considered only moderately permeable. NRSC soil type mapping provides only a general guide, with resolution to about 5 acres. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. There are no surface indications of, nor history of unstable soils in the immediate site vicinity. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The applicant proposes to cut & fill approximately 500 cubic yards of material, in order to prepare the site for construction of buildings & greenhouses. All cut material will provide fill elsewhere on the site. No off-site fill is anticipated to be required. Cut & Fill areas are shown on the attached "Site Plan with Temporary Erosion & Secuimentation Control". f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion will be prevented to the maximum extent possible during all phases of site development. Silt fences will be installed along downhill edges of areas to be disturbed. Straw mulch will be used to stabilize exposed surfaces. Soil piles will be covered with plastic if they will remain for two days (during the wet season; seven days during the dry season). Little to no surface flow of stormwater is anticipated due to the high permeability of site soils. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Phase 1: Approximately 18% Phase 2: Approximately 52% SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 3 of 12 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Temporary Erosion & Sedimentation Controls will be implemented as described above in Item f. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None. 3. Water a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There are no surface waters on or in the immediate site vicinity. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 4 of 12 No. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Domestic sewage from rest rooms and an employee kitchen will be the only discharge to the single existing on-site sewage system, rated for an average flow of 180 gallons per day (240 gpd peak). With a maximum of 14 employees at any one time, the domestic sewage discharge rate should be below 180 gals/day. c. Water runoff(including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Stormwater from roof downspouts will be dispersed and infiltrated on-site. Infiltration features including rain gardens and sub-surface infiltration beds will be constructed with the goal of 100% on-site infiltration. Emergency overflows from these features will mimic pre-development conditions, routing overflows to the north central portion of the parcel, at the head of an existing natural ravine. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No waste material will be discharged with stormwater. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. Proposed site development is not expected to significantly alter or affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: An engineered stormwater management plan will deploy infiltration facilities and rain gardens to maximize on-site infiltration of stormwater, in order to maintain natural drainage patterns. 4. Plants a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: _X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _X shrubs _X_grass pasture crop or grain Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 5 of 12 water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Approximately 1 acre of second growth forest, shrubs and weeds would be removed or altered as part of the proposed development. c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Disturbed portions of the site will be vegetated with native plants after construction of the proposed buildings and greenhouses. Rain gardens will serve to infiltrate stormwater and support native plant re-vegetation. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. None known. 5. Animals a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: Birds and small animals. b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Natural habitat and vegetation outside of proposed development areas will be maintained in its natural state to the maximum extent possible. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. None known. 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Propane and electricity (heat pumps) supplemented with passive solar heating of greenhouses will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs. Lighting used in the growing process will produce heat so that significant additional heating of the greenhouses is not expected to be needed. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 6 of 12 b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energyby adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Heated spaces within proposed buildings will be well insulated, with low- emissivity windows. 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. There are no environmental health hazards that could occur as a result of this proposal. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. None known or suspected. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. There are no known existing hazardous chemicals or conditions. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. Dilute organic fertilizers may be used as part of growing operations. Good housekeeping measures will be implemented to ensure safe storage and use of any fertilizers. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. No special emergency services will be required. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Environmental health hazards will be prevented. A fully functional existing on- site sewage system will be properly maintained to continue to treat domestic sewage generated by employees. No hazardous substances will be used or discharged as a result of proposed operations. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The project will produce an increase in traffic noise from workers'vehicles (up to 14 jobs may be created at the fully-operational facility). Additional freight operations SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11.960) May 2014 Page 7 of 12 will result from transporting supplies to the facility, and transporting product and compostable materials. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. None. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. Residential and light industrial. The proposed project is not expected to affect current land uses on nearby and adjacent properties. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? The site has been harvested of timber in the past. No working farmlands or forest lands remain in the immediate site vicinity. 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: No. c. Describe any structures on the site. Two structures currently exist on the site: A 2,592 SF metal work shop and a 576 SF open-air garage. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The existing 576 SF open-air garage would be dismantled and potentially relocated elsewhere on the site. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Jefferson County Zoning of the subject parcel is Light Industrial. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Light Industrial development not to exceed 55% of land area. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. No. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 8 of 12 i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The proposed business would employ up to 14 people, with about 4 people present at any one time. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? One person occupied the facility until the property was transferred in October 2014. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Complete review of development plans by Jefferson County Department of Community Development, with public comment period. m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: Complete review of development plans by Jefferson County Department of Community Development, with public comment period. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low-income housing. None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Less than 35 ft. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. 11. Light and glare SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197.11.960) May 2014 Page 9 of 12 a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Larry Scott Trail is approximately 1,000 feet to the north of the site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe. No. C. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. No. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. An assessment of site conditions, and consultations with the previous property owner & occupants, plus consultations with the light industrial neighbors at 183 W. Fredericks, suggests no cultural or historic resources have ever been observed at or adjacent to the subject site. During site development activities, all personnel will be instructed to report any evidence of cultural or historic resources immediately to project leaders, which will determine reporting requirements prior to allowing work resumption. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197.11-960) May 2014 Page 10 of 12 d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. As stated above, during site development activities, all personnel will be instructed to report any evidence of cultural or historic resources immediately to project leaders, which will determine reporting requirements prior to allowing work resumption. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The subject parcel at 192 W. Fredericks Street, is on the north side of W. Fredericks, on a section of W. Fredericks Street that is not maintained by Jefferson County west of Louisa Street (see Site Vicinity Map). Directly east of the parcel, Louisa Street is only a vacant right-of-way with a gravel driveway along the east half. South of Fredericks, Louisa Street is a gravel road providing access to several parcels along Sandstone Lane and Pebble Lane, local dead-end streets south of Fredericks Street. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes, the area is served by Jefferson Transit which runs buses along Hwy 20 approximately 800 ft from the subject site. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? The completed project would have 14 off-street parking spaces, as required by Jefferson County (even though typically only four will be used at any one time). d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? Approximately six to ten vehicle-trips per day will be added. An analysis of expected operational scenarios was used to derive this estimate. g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. No. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11460) May 2014 Page 11 of 12 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Employees will be encouraged to bicycle to work. Principal applicants are avid bicyclists. 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Yes, fire and police protection services could be needed for the proposed business. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Security systems as mandated by the State Liquor Control Board will minimize police protection impacts. Code-compliant construction materials will minimize the impact to local fire protection services. 16. Utilities a. Identify utilities currently available at the site: City water, electricity, and telephone utilities are currently available at the site. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. A propane tank will be proposed for the developed facility. C. Signature The above answers are tr and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying to mak- s decision. Signatu � Name of signee: Simon Little Position and Agency/Organization: Applicant's agent Date Submitted: /6-21-P1 D. supplemental sheet for nonproject actions Not applicable. SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 12 of 12 e���°N cow JEFFERSON COUNTY { DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 I Web:www.co.Jefferson.wa.us/communitvdevelopment 9Sar Nc -' Tel:360.379.44501 Fax: 360.379,4451 I Email:dcd(a,co.Jefferson.wa.us SquareONE Resource Center I Building Permits & Inspections I Development Review I Long Range Planning FINAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE AND LEAD AGENCY STATUS DATE: February 12,2015 PROPONENTS: Dream City,LLC 192 W. Fredericks Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 PROPOSAL: The project is to develop a Light Industrial parcel on the western side of the Glen Cove Light Industrial District for a marijuana production facility. Phase 1 includes remodeling an existing 2,592 s.f.building, dismantling a 576 s.f.carport, adding a 7,000 s.f. insulated metal building and making stormwater improvements. Phase 2 includes an additional 7,000 s.f.building and three greenhouses totaling 22,638 s.f.,and the addition of a fire access lane. PROPERTY LOCATION: 192 W.Fredericks Street, Port Townsend LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 948601301,EISENBE[S BAY VIEW BLK 13,LOTS I THRU 12 W/PTN VAC ALLEY, SOPHIA ST.& SNAC ELWOOD ST ADJ NOTICE OF LEAD AGENCY: Jefferson County has determined that it is the lead agency for the above- described proposal. NOTICE OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE: Jefferson County has determined that the above described proposal, conducted in conformance with the applicable Jefferson County Codes and Ordinances,would not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment, and an environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the Jefferson County Development Review Division. COMMENT PERIOD: This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. Jefferson County has considered comments on its preliminary determination of nonsignificance. There is no further comment period on the DNS. APPEAL: There is no Administrative Appeal process under the Jefferson County Code for Type I permit decisions as specified by JCC 18.40.260 and JCC 18.40.810(1). Appeal of a Type I permit requires Judicial Appeal as specified by Section 18.40.340 of the JCC. �'. 211 3 2.o45— Carl Smith, SEPA Responsible Official Date ZON14-00045 ZO N 14-00045 TIMOTHY RUYBALID LARRY D. HUTTON 131 LOUISA STREET 1240 W. SIMS WAY#84 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 ZO N 14-00045 ZON14-00045 COLIN ANDERSON CARLEYANDERSON 151 LOUISA STREET 151 LOUISA STREET PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 ZON14-00045 ZON14-00045 JOCELYN DAVIS PETER C. DAVIS 2023 E. SIMS WAY#327 2023 E. SIMS WAY#327 PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 ZON14-00045 ZON14-00045 KIM&JAY GORDON DR. MICHAEL DAM 153 LOUISA STREET 21 BALSA WAY PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 ZON14-00045 ZON14-00045 CARL PIEHL JASON &ALIYA CRAWFORD 123 SANDSTONE LANE 36 COTTAGE PLACE PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 ZON 14-00045 ZON 14-00045 RYAN& NICOLE BARNARD NANCY RODY 155 LOUISA STREET 159 LOUISA STREET PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 ZO N 14-00045 ZON14-00045 CHRIS&ANGIE O'DELL JARED KEEFER 133 SANDSTONE LANE 121 LOUISA STREET PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 ZON14-00045 ZON14-00045 ORCAA-SEPA DIVISION OLYMPIC REGION CLEAN AIR AGENCY GEOFFREY GLASS SEPA REVIEW STAFF 2940-B LIMITED LANE NW 2940-B LIMITED LANE NW OLYMPIA,WA 98502 OLYMPIA,WA 98502 ZON14-00045 ZON14-00045 SIMON LITTLE EVERETTA SORENSEN PE 210 N VICTORY AVE 715 GRANT STREET PORT TOWNSEND,WA 98368 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368-2405 ZON14-00045 MARC HILT PO BOX 1909 192 ST PORT TOWNSEND, WA SNS r1 c7-ti PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368-0062 k1.s°NJEFFERSON COUNTY : DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT , 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web:www.co.iefferson.wa.uslcommunitydevelopment 'rse,Ncc° Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcd(ko.iefferson.wa.us SquareONE Resource Center I Building Permits it Inspections i Development Review I Long Range Planning FINAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE AND LEAD AGENCY STATUS DATE: February 12,2015 PROPONENTS: Dream City,LLC 192 W. Fredericks Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 PROPOSAL: The project is to develop a Light Industrial parcel on the western side of the Glen Cove Light Industrial District for a marijuana production facility. Phase 1 includes remodeling an existing 2,592 s.f.building, dismantling a 576 s.f.carport,adding a 7,000 s.f. insulated metal building and making stormwater improvements. Phase 2 includes an additional 7,000 s.f.building and three greenhouses totaling 22,638 s.f., and the addition of a fire access lane. PROPERTY LOCATION: 192 W.Fredericks Street,Port Townsend LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 948601301,EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13,LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN VAC ALLEY, SOPHIA ST. & SNAC ELWOOD ST ADJ NOTICE OF LEAD AGENCY: Jefferson County has determined that it is the lead agency for the above- described proposal. NOTICE OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE: Jefferson County has determined that the above described proposal, conducted in conformance with the applicable Jefferson County Codes and Ordinances,would not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment,and an environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the Jefferson County Development Review Division. COMMENT PERIOD: This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. Jefferson County has considered comments on its preliminary determination of nonsignificance. There is no further comment period on the DNS. APPEAL: There is no Administrative Appeal process under the Jefferson County Code for Type I permit decisions as specified by JCC 18.40.260 and JCC 18.40.810(1). Appeal of a Type I permit requires Judicial Appeal as specified by Section 18.40.340 of the JCC. 2/ I 3/2.075- Carl 2 75Carl Smith, SEPA Responsible Official Date EVALUATION OF PROPOSAL Consistency with other plans: The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan has designated this parcel as Light Industrial. The purpose of the Glen Cove Light Industrial district is to facilitate economic development and provide for a broad range of light industrial uses. The light industrial uses and activities associated with this district are intended to be compatible with the Glen Cove area. Potential indirect impacts of Light Industrial uses adjacent to Residential uses are recognized and addressed in Development Regulations of the Jefferson County Code. Mitigating measures for the development of this Light Industrial parcel are implemented by the application of development regulations and permit requirements. Adjacency of land uses of Light Industrial and Residential is mitigated through setback and screening requirements;and lighting and noise ordinances are codified in the development regulations. Trip generation does not increase significantly. Consideration of the short term and long term effects of the proposal,direct and indirect and cumulative impacts,the mitigating measures of the development regulations,the level of intensity of use of the Light Industrial parcel,the severity of potential impacts to the adjacent neighborhood,and the likelihood of occurrence of unmitigated impacts,the analysis does not find a reasonable likelihood for impacts that rise to the level of Probable Significant Adverse Environmental Impacts. DETERMINATION Determination of the SEPA Responsible Official: I have reviewed and considered the referenced proposal,the environmental checklist,public comments, and other available material,and determine that there is not a reasonable likelihood that the proposal will have probable significant adverse environmental impacts. I hereby issue a Determination of Non-Significance(DNS). 0//Jho/j— Carl Smith,Director,Department of Community Development Date and SEPA Responsible Official 4 rr MEMORANDUM TO: Carl Smith, SEPA Responsible Official FROM: Joel Peterson,Associate Planner DATE: February 11,2015 SUBJECT: Analysis for Threshold Determination under the rules of the State Environmental Policy Act(WAC 197-11) Proponent: Marc Hilt Dream City,LLC 192 W.Fredericks Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 Representative: Simon Little/Studio STL Application: MLA14-00090/ZON14-00045 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Proposal: The project is to develop a Light Industrial parcel on the western side of the Glen Cove Light Industrial District for a marijuana production facility. Phase 1 includes remodeling an existing 2,592 s.f. building, dismantling a 576 s.f. carport,adding a 7,000 s.f. insulated metal building and making stormwater improvements. Phase 2 includes an additional 7,000 s.f. building and three greenhouses totaling 22,638 s.f.,and the addition of a fire access lane. Property Location: 192 W. Fredericks Street,Port Townsend Legal Description: Parcel 948601301,EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13,LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN VAC ALLEY, SOPHIA ST. & SNAC ELWOOD ST ADJ Site Conditions:The parcel is just under two acres and is mostly wooded with regrowth. The site has an existing garage/shop and carport. The parcel includes vacated portions of Sophia Street to the west, vacated portion of Elwood Street to the north,and vacated portion of Louisa Street to the east. Access to the parcel is from West Fredericks Street on the right,past Louisa Street on the left. The site has sloping topography which will be levelled in preparation for development. Surrounding Area: The parcel is in the portion of Glen Cove that extends west of State Route 19. This extension includes properties north of West Fredericks Street zoned Light Industrial, and south of West Fredericks Street zoned Light Industrial/Commercial. The Glen Cove Light Industrial District is surrounded by residential parcels, primarily Rural Residential 1:5. The subject parcel is on the extreme western extent of the Glen Cove Light Industrial District and abuts a residential development named Maplewood Meadows,as well as other Rural Residential parcels to the north that may not be in Maplewood Meadows proper. It is reported that the immediate neighborhood consists of at least 17 homes and 10 undeveloped residential lots. 1 SEPA CHECKLIST Submittal: The Environmental Checklist was submitted to the Department of Community Development October 29,2014. Staff determined the checklist to be substantially complete December 18,2014. NOTICE Public Notice was published in the Port Townsend-Jefferson County Leader newspaper on December 24, 2014. Notice of the pending threshold determination was posted on the property by the applicant/representative on the 22"of December, 2014. Notice was mailed to agencies and also to property owners within 300 feet of the property on December 23,2014. COMMENTS Sixteen(16)comment letters were received from community members and five(5)comments from agencies, including Olympic Region Clean Air Agency,Department of Ecology,Washington State Department of Transportation,Jefferson County Public Works Department and Jefferson County Environmental Health Department. All comments were reviewed and sent to the applicant.The applicant provided clarifications regarding questions about the checklist information on January 26,2015. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMENTS Air Potential Impacts: air quality and odors. Analysis: Applicant will be permitted through Olympic Region Clean Air Agency(ORCAA)for Demolition Permit and Air Permit. Construction best management practices will be employed to control dust.Facility design incorporates ventilation and filtration systems to meet or exceed compliance with all regulations set forth by ORCAA. Water Potential Impacts:contamination of Critical Aquifer Recharge Area,runoff from impervious surfaces, elevated groundwater and offsite damages Analysis: Applicant must meet Jefferson County Unified Development Code Sections 18.30.060 Grading and excavation standards, and 18.30.070 Stormwater Management Standards set for erosion and sedimentation control and stormwater management. The code adopts requirements set forth by the Washington Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. The proponent has submitted a Stormwater Site Plan, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, and Impervious Surface Calculation Worksheet. Stormwater infiltration design is for 100% on-site. Based upon the requirement to develop and implement an approved Stormwater Site Plan, Public Works Department recommends finding that the proposal is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts related to erosion,sedimentation and stormwater runoff. 2 Environmental Health Potential Impacts: disposition of herbicides and process wastes,contamination of groundwater. Analysis: The marijuana cultivation process is not designed to produce runoff or nutrient entry to groundwater or septic system. Water from cultivation will not contribute to wastewater flows. The septic design estimates wastewater should not exceed typical household strength waste and recommends annual testing.Per WAC 314-55,Marijuana wastes from growing operations are required to be rendered unusable by mixing and grinding with at least 50%compost materials before disposal. The project will be utilizing offsite disposal for all solid waste from the growing operation. Aesthetics Potential Impacts: light pollution, noise,unsightly development Analysis: Applicant must comply with Jefferson County Unified Development Code standards for setbacks and screening(18.30.120). North and west property lines will have"Screen-A", 15-foot deep full screening landscaping that functions as a visual barrier between residential and nonresidential areas, with a 25-foot building setback. The south property line will have"Screen-B"landscaping 10-feet deep that functions as a filtered screen visual separator,to screen industrial use from a road,with a 20-foot building setback. The proposed 8-foot fence will be behind this landscape screening and largely be obscured. There will be no barbed wire,etc. on top of the fence. The fence will be of solid construction and will aid in noise attenuation. There are no plans to operate large machinery or heavy equipment during the operation of the facility. The principle exterior building material is to be metal siding. The abutting land uses of Light Industrial and Residential is mitigated through setback and screening requirements. Lighting must be installed in compliance with JCC 18.30.140. Exterior lighting shall not exceed 30 feet in height. All lighting fixtures shall be appropriate in scale, intensity,and height to the use they are serving. The peak of the tallest proposed structure will be 25 feet. Exterior lighting shall be energy- efficient and shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflections are contained within the boundaries of the parcel. Exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights-of-way.No lighting shall blink, flash,or be of unusually high intensity or brightness. Transportation Potential Impacts:Access at Fredericks Street& SR20, increased traffic volume/trips per day and intersection wait times,safety issues with pedestrians. Analysis: WSDOT has no concerns with this proposal,the facility will be a low traffic generator, and SR 20 at this location has mainline left turn channelization with illumination. Public Works Department finds that the proposal is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts to the County road system. Traffic generation of 6-10 vehicle trips per day is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers vehicular trip end definition and is based on a shift size of four(4)employees during normal business hours. Entry/exit from the site is located at the southwest corner of the property,providing additional sight distance and travel time before passing the crossroad of Louisa Street. Loading/unloading will occur on-site which will minimize impact to traffic flow on W. Fredericks Street. 3 A EVALUATION OF PROPOSAL Consistency with other plans: The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan has designated this parcel as Light Industrial. The purpose of the Glen Cove Light Industrial district is to facilitate economic development and provide for a broad range of light industrial uses. The light industrial uses and activities associated with this district are intended to be compatible with the Glen Cove area. Potential indirect impacts of Light Industrial uses adjacent to Residential uses are recognized and addressed in Development Regulations of the Jefferson County Code. Mitigating measures for the development of this Light Industrial parcel are implemented by the application of development regulations and permit requirements. Adjacency of land uses of Light Industrial and Residential is mitigated through setback and screening requirements;and lighting and noise ordinances are codified in the development regulations. Trip generation does not increase significantly. Consideration of the short term and long term effects of the proposal,direct and indirect and cumulative impacts,the mitigating measures of the development regulations,the level of intensity of use of the Light Industrial parcel,the severity of potential impacts to the adjacent neighborhood,and the likelihood of occurrence of unmitigated impacts,the analysis does not find a reasonable likelihood for impacts that rise to the level of Probable Significant Adverse Environmental Impacts. DETERMINATION Determination of the SEPA Responsible Official: I have reviewed and considered the referenced proposal,the environmental checklist,public comments, and other available material,and determine that there is not a reasonable likelihood that the proposal will have probable significant adverse environmental impacts. I hereby issue a Determination of Non-Significance(DNS). Carl Smith,Director,Department of Community Development Date and SEPA Responsible Official 4 �y�so" cow JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT „ 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368 j Web:www.co.jefferson.wa.us/communitvdevelooment V.SH Nc''-° Tel:360.379,4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 I Email:dcd@co.jefferson.wa.us SquareONE Resource Center j Building Permits & Inspections I Development Review I Long Range Planning FINAL DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE AND LEAD AGENCY STATUS DATE: February 12,2015 PROPONENTS: Dream City, LLC 192 W. Fredericks Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 PROPOSAL: The project is to develop a Light Industrial parcel on the western side of the Glen Cove Light Industrial District for a marijuana production facility. Phase 1 includes remodeling an existing 2,592 s.f.building, dismantling a 576 s.f. carport, adding a 7,000 s.f. insulated metal building and making stormwater improvements. Phase 2 includes an additional 7,000 s.f. building and three greenhouses totaling 22,638 s.f.,and the addition of a fire access lane. PROPERTY LOCATION: 192 W.Fredericks Street, Port Townsend LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 948601301,EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13,LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN VAC ALLEY,SOPHIA ST. & S/VAC ELWOOD ST ADJ NOTICE OF LEAD AGENCY: Jefferson County has determined that it is the lead agency for the above- described proposal. NOTICE OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE: Jefferson County has determined that the above described proposal, conducted in conformance with the applicable Jefferson County Codes and Ordinances,would not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment,and an environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the Jefferson County Development Review Division. COMMENT PERIOD: This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. Jefferson County has considered comments on its preliminary determination of nonsignificance. There is no further comment period on the DNS. APPEAL: There is no Administrative Appeal process under the Jefferson County Code for Type I permit decisions as specified by JCC 18.40.260 and JCC 18.40.810(1). Appeal of a Type I permit requires Judicial Appeal as specified by Section 18.40.340 of the JCC. 4,1_,'';7:-- -- 24 3/20%5— Carl Smith, SEPA Responsible Official Date MEMORANDUM TO: Carl Smith, SEPA Responsible Official FROM: Joel Peterson,Associate Planner DATE: February 11,2015 SUBJECT: Analysis for Threshold Determination under the rules of the State Environmental Policy Act(WAC 197-11) Proponent: Marc Hilt Dream City,LLC 192 W. Fredericks Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 Representative: Simon Little/Studio STL Application: MLA I 4-00090/ZON14-00045 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Proposal: The project is to develop a Light Industrial parcel on the western side of the Glen Cove Light Industrial District for a marijuana production facility. Phase 1 includes remodeling an existing 2,592 s.f. building, dismantling a 576 s.f. carport,adding a 7,000 s.f. insulated metal building and making stormwater improvements. Phase 2 includes an additional 7,000 s.fbuilding and three greenhouses totaling 22,638 s.f.,and the addition of a fire access lane. Property Location: 192 W.Fredericks Street, Port Townsend Legal Description: Parcel 948601301,EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13,LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN VAC ALLEY, SOPHIA ST.& SNAC ELWOOD ST ADJ Site Conditions:The parcel is just under two acres and is mostly wooded with regrowth. The site has an existing garage/shop and carport. The parcel includes vacated portions of Sophia Street to the west, vacated portion of Elwood Street to the north,and vacated portion of Louisa Street to the east. Access to the parcel is from West Fredericks Street on the right,past Louisa Street on the left. The site has sloping topography which will be levelled in preparation for development. Surrounding Area: The parcel is in the portion of Glen Cove that extends west of State Route 19. This extension includes properties north of West Fredericks Street zoned Light Industrial,and south of West Fredericks Street zoned Light Industrial/Commercial. The Glen Cove Light Industrial District is surrounded by residential parcels,primarily Rural Residential 1:5. The subject parcel is on the extreme western extent of the Glen Cove Light Industrial District and abuts a residential development named Maplewood Meadows, as well as other Rural Residential parcels to the north that may not be in Maplewood Meadows proper. It is reported that the immediate neighborhood consists of at least 17 homes and 10 undeveloped residential lots. 1 SEPA CHECKLIST Submittal: The Environmental Checklist was submitted to the Department of Community Development October 29,2014. Staff determined the checklist to be substantially complete December 18,2014. NOTICE Public Notice was published in the Port Townsend-Jefferson County Leader newspaper on December 24, 2014. Notice of the pending threshold determination was posted on the property by the applicant/representative on the 22°a of December,2014. Notice was mailed to agencies and also to property owners within 300 feet of the property on December 23,2014. COMMENTS Sixteen(16)comment letters were received from community members and five(5)comments from agencies, including Olympic Region Clean Air Agency,Department of Ecology,Washington State Department of Transportation,Jefferson County Public Works Department and Jefferson County Environmental Health Department. All comments were reviewed and sent to the applicant.The applicant provided clarifications regarding questions about the checklist information on January 26, 2015. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMENTS Air Potential Impacts: air quality and odors. Analysis:Applicant will be permitted through Olympic Region Clean Air Agency(ORCAA) for Demolition Permit and Air Permit. Construction best management practices will be employed to control dust.Facility design incorporates ventilation and filtration systems to meet or exceed compliance with all regulations set forth by ORCAA. Water Potential Impacts:contamination of Critical Aquifer Recharge Area,runoff from impervious surfaces, elevated groundwater and offsite damages Analysis: Applicant must meet Jefferson County Unified Development Code Sections 18.30.060 Grading and excavation standards, and 18.30.070 Stormwater Management Standards set for erosion and sedimentation control and stormwater management. The code adopts requirements set forth by the Washington Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. The proponent has submitted a Stormwater Site Plan, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan,and Impervious Surface Calculation Worksheet. Stormwater infiltration design is for 100%on-site. Based upon the requirement to develop and implement an approved Stormwater Site Plan, Public Works Department recommends finding that the proposal is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts related to erosion,sedimentation and stormwater runoff. 2 Environmental Health Potential Impacts:disposition of herbicides and process wastes,contamination of groundwater. Analysis: The marijuana cultivation process is not designed to produce runoff or nutrient entry to groundwater or septic system. Water from cultivation will not contribute to wastewater flows. The septic design estimates wastewater should not exceed typical household strength waste and recommends annual testing.Per WAC 314-55, Marijuana wastes from growing operations are required to be rendered unusable by mixing and grinding with at least 50%compost materials before disposal. The project will be utilizing offsite disposal for all solid waste from the growing operation. Aesthetics Potential Impacts: light pollution, noise,unsightly development Analysis: Applicant must comply with Jefferson County Unified Development Code standards for setbacks and screening(18.30.120). North and west property lines will have"Screen-A", 15-foot deep full screening landscaping that functions as a visual barrier between residential and nonresidential areas, with a 25-foot building setback. The south property line will have"Screen-B"landscaping 10-feet deep that functions as a filtered screen visual separator,to screen industrial use from a road,with a 20-foot building setback. The proposed 8-foot fence will be behind this landscape screening and largely be obscured. There will be no barbed wire,etc. on top of the fence. The fence will be of solid construction and will aid in noise attenuation. There are no plans to operate large machinery or heavy equipment during the operation of the facility. The principle exterior building material is to be metal siding. The abutting land uses of Light Industrial and Residential is mitigated through setback and screening requirements. Lighting must be installed in compliance with JCC 18.30.140. Exterior lighting shall not exceed 30 feet in height. All lighting fixtures shall be appropriate in scale, intensity,and height to the use they are serving. The peak of the tallest proposed structure will be 25 feet. Exterior lighting shall be energy- efficient and shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflections are contained within the boundaries of the parcel. Exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights-of-way.No lighting shall blink, flash,or be of unusually high intensity or brightness. Transportation Potential Impacts:Access at Fredericks Street& SR20, increased traffic volume/trips per day and intersection wait times, safety issues with pedestrians. Analysis: WSDOT has no concerns with this proposal,the facility will be a low traffic generator, and SR 20 at this location has mainline left turn channelization with illumination. Public Works Department finds that the proposal is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts to the County road system. Traffic generation of 6-10 vehicle trips per day is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers vehicular trip end definition and is based on a shift size of four(4)employees during normal business hours. Entry/exit from the site is located at the southwest corner of the property,providing additional sight distance and travel time before passing the crossroad of Louisa Street. Loading/unloading will occur on-site which will minimize impact to traffic flow on W. Fredericks Street. 3 A EVALUATION OF PROPOSAL Consistency with other plans: The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan has designated this parcel as Light Industrial. The purpose of the Glen Cove Light Industrial district is to facilitate economic development and provide for a broad range of light industrial uses. The light industrial uses and activities associated with this district are intended to be compatible with the Glen Cove area. Potential indirect impacts of Light Industrial uses adjacent to Residential uses are recognized and addressed in Development Regulations of the Jefferson County Code. Mitigating measures for the development of this Light Industrial parcel are implemented by the application of development regulations and permit requirements. Adjacency of land uses of Light Industrial and Residential is mitigated through setback and screening requirements;and lighting and noise ordinances are codified in the development regulations. Trip generation does not increase significantly. Consideration of the short term and long term effects of the proposal,direct and indirect and cumulative impacts,the mitigating measures of the development regulations,the level of intensity of use of the Light Industrial parcel,the severity of potential impacts to the adjacent neighborhood,and the likelihood of occurrence of unmitigated impacts,the analysis does not find a reasonable likelihood for impacts that rise to the level of Probable Significant Adverse Environmental Impacts. DETERMINATION Determination of the SEPA Responsible Official: I have reviewed and considered the referenced proposal,the environmental checklist,public comments, and other available material,and determine that there is not a reasonable likelihood that the proposal will have probable significant adverse environmental impacts. I hereby issue a Determination of Non-Significance(DNS). 0'72043-- Carl Smith,Director, Department of Community Development Date and SEPA Responsible Official 4 Joel Peterson From: Jared Keefer<jaredkeefer@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 6:47 PM To: Joel Peterson Subject: Public Comment--Dream City LLC marijuana production facility Categories: Public Comment Joel Peterson Associate Planner Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 Fax 360-379-4451 RE: Public Comment on the SEPA Dear SEPA Official, I am glad to have the opportunity to review the application and provide comments. As someone who lives in the community immediately surrounding this proposed development and familiar with the proposal, I can assure you that many of the statements made in the SEPA Application by the applicant are either not accurate nor do they detail the level which would be appropriate for a Determination of Non Significance. Please consider the following items as they relate to the proposed development and the SEPA Checklist: • The easement on Louisa Street should not be vacated. Adjacent parcels to the rear of the subject parcel will need to be served with access. Fredrick's St via Louisa makes the most logical sense for this access. It is much more developed and appropriate than the next most likely alternative, Reynolds Road. As such further determination and evaluation of this project will be needed. • This proposed development sits at the only access point for an approximate 47 parcels served via the Louisa Street/Fredrick's Street access. Current infrastructure at the proposed site is inadequate and should be upgraded with increased development making improvements to the infrastructure. • Section A, item 10 of the SEPA checklist is not wholly inclusive of the approvals or permits that will be needed. Other approvals that will be needed are City of Port Townsend Approval to connect to potable water, Approval of Jefferson County Public Health to connect to (or alter) existing On-Site Wastewater Disposal System, the Olympic Region Clean Air Agency for an Air Permit and Jefferson County Public Works approval to Vacate the Louisa Street Right of Way. • The calculations for impervious surface of the final phase are dependent upon the vacation of the right of way. Without that vacation impervious surfaces would exceed the required maximum. The assumption of that vacation is not appropriate at this juncture and therefore should not be included in the calculations. • The site is located within a susceptible Critical Aquifer Recharge Area. As such, additional mitigations should be taken beyond the proposed in order to ensure that improper treated or diverted stormwater does not reach the aquifer. Actions could be reducing the amount of impervious service, increasing the size of rain gardens or stormwater treatment mechanisms and the elimination of a max flow diversion that (under times of extreme precipitation) would force large volumes of poorly treated or 1 non-treated stormwater directly to surface or ground water sources. Additionally, based upon the applicants own studies, as ground water is approximately 5 -7 feet below the surface. Dry wells or infiltrative devices that direct stormwater below ground should not be permitted. Doing so may allow for inadequate treatment of stormwater prior to contacting groundwater. • Section B, part 2, item a. The applicant states that no emissions to the air would result. To the contrary, it is well known in the industry that persistent odors are present from marijuana growing operations. Mitigations to these emissions must be put into place to protect people and the surrounding environment. These should be detailed in an Environmental Impact Statement. • In order to protect the environment and the susceptible Critical Aquifer Recharge Area, it should be clearly required that no wells shall be drilled on the property. All water used must be from a community water system (City of Port Townsend). • Section B, part 3, item b2. This section does not address any waste from the growing process, liquid fertilizers, pesticides, etc. that may be discharged. It has been well documented in commercial establishments that contaminants, other than bodily waste, is discharged down the drain by workers. This discharge may change the characteristics of the waste stream and may adversely impact the environment in ways that we clearly do not understand at this point. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement should be required to clearly describe those impacts and plan for protective measures. • Section B, part 3, item c1. Routing excess stormwater offsite creates hazards and adversely impacts neighboring parcels. The applicant states that during emergency situations, flows will be routed to the existing natural ravine. Based upon the site plan, that natural ravine continues on to neighboring parcels. I am sure that the applicant's neighbors will be happy to see new or larger flows through their property, adversely impacting their development opportunities and property values. The applicants, at the very least, should evaluate this further via an Environmental Impact Statement and may also need to design a stormwater system to handle all stormwater on-site. Something that completely mimics the existing property characteristics and mitigates the stormwater impacts of the large impervious surfaces on the property itself. Additionally, during high rain events the rain gardens located to the south of the property may also adversely affect Fredrick's Street and high concentrations of stormwater would erode the street causing significant impacts to the infrastructure of the area. • Section B, Part 3, item c3. The applicant did not directly respond to this question. It does not ask if the proposal will significantly affect drainage. It asked if it does alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns. And, based upon the application and associated documents, the answer is "Yes". As such this question must be fully responded to. • Section B, part 4, item e. This item was not addressed fully. There are noxious weeds and invasive species located on the parcel which are clearly visible and identifiable. Scotch Broom being the primary species present of many. An Environmental Impact Statement should be required to clearly describe those impacts and plan for protective measures such as an invasive species control plan. • Section B, part 5, item a. This list is non-specific and is not inclusive of the wide varieties of animals present. What type of birds and they are wide ranging? Deer are very prevalent in the areas as well as Coyote, in addition to birds and small animals. Is too much habitat being removed and further mitigation needed in order to retain the natural character of the site. Further clarification and should be sought via an Environmental Impact Statement. • Section B, part 7, item a. The response is not truthful. There are a number of environmental health hazards that could occur. Anything from basic workplace safety and personal protection,to chemical pesticides and fertilizers used in the growing process. In addition, hazardous elements used in equipment such as lights and ballasts can adversely affect human health. Finally, the product itself is a substance that has adverse health effects in humans, Marijuana. These hazards should be more adequately described and addressed via an Environmental Impact Statement. 2 • Section B, part 7, item a5. The response to this question does not adequately address the environmental health hazards that will be present in the operation. It minimizes the environmental health hazards down to only cover Wastewater in addition to providing two statements that hazards will be prevented, substances won't be use or discharged. Unfortunately, the question required more detail. How will they be prevented? Hazardous substances will be present in the operations, among others, a large amount of marijuana. The answer to this question is inadequate given the scope of the operation. It appears that the applicant is unfamiliar with the potential operational hazards of the proposed development. These hazards should be more adequately described and addressed via an Environmental Impact Statement. Ultimately, a hazards management evaluation and plan should be implemented to completely and accurately address this issue and the environmental health of all of those who work in and live around this facility. • Section B, part 7, item b2. The applicant identifies that there will be an increase in traffic noise as a result of the proposed development. However, the applicant does not answer this question when it seeks further clarification as to the type and levels of noise. The applicant should be required to answer this question accurately as it is clear by the applicants own statement in the previous question that noise will be created. • Section B, part 7, item b2. Accordingly, the applicant should be required to put measures into place that will control the additional noise impact that will be generated from their proposed development. This should be addressed in both the short-term and long-term measures through an Environmental Impact Statement. • Section B, part 8. Residential land uses abut this proposed development. In addition, residential land uses are more extensive in the area than commercial or industrial. If not properly addressed,the proposal will have great effect on currently land uses non nearby properties. Noise pollution, light pollution, improperly managed stormwater and odor pollution not to mention a monetarily high value production site located immediately adjacent to residents and families with children who could be placed at risk by those who seek to acquire that product though illegal means. Impacts to these uses should be more throughout delineated through an Environmental Impact Statement. • Section B, part 8, Item i. This response directly contradicts the statement made in Section 3, item b2. The accurate statement would be the proposed business would employ up to 14 people, who would be on site at any one time. The applicant should be required to change their statement to be consistent throughout the document. • Section B, part 10, item c. The answer provided is not consistent with the land use requirements or site plan. A 25 foot buffer with a vegetation plan is required due to the residential properties that border the proposed development. This is intended to mitigate the adverse ascetic impacts of potentially 35 foot tall buildings occupying approximately 55% of the available land space immediately adjacent to family homes. The Applicant should be required to accurately address the question. In addition, the applicant should be required to complete an Environmental Impact Statement to further describe and potentially mitigate the ascetic impacts given that the proposed development abuts residential development and is in the immediate vicinity another residential housing development. These should include, no signage identifying the business name, nor the products produced. Building color should also be required to blend with the surrounding land ascetic. The fencing should be located in a manner that the view is partially obstructed to passersby. • Section B, part 11, item a. The applicant didn't adequately answer the question. Based upon liquor control board regulations outdoor lighting systems are required for security purposes. The applicant must adequately describe these systems and their use. • Section B, part 11, item b. The applicant didn't adequately answer the question. Again, Based upon liquor control board regulations outdoor lighting systems are required for security purposes. Accordingly, light or glare can be a safety hazard and interfere with views of adjacent parcels. At a 3 minimum, the lighting system must be designed with motion detectors so that the lights activate only when necessary. • Section B, part 11, item d. The applicant must have proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts. Their locations is at the intersection of a well-traveled road by both cars and persons waling in the road. As there is no sidewalk, people (children included) walk in the road. Light glare from the proposed development could obscure the view of drivers at the intersection and cause accidents with pedestrians, not to mention other cars. Additionally, light or glare can cause light pollution and interfere with views of adjacent parcels. At a minimum,the lighting system must be designed with motion detectors so that the lights activate only when necessary of the area to be monitored. Further evaluation is warranted via an Environmental Impact Statement. • Section B, part 12, item a. In addition, there are neighborhood play areas to the south in the Louisa St residential area. Approximately 600 feet away. Children ranging in ages from 7 months to 12 years reside and recreate in the area. Further evaluation is warranted via an Environmental Impact Statement to adequately describe the environment which the proposed development is entering. • Section B, part 12, item c. One proposed measures could be to not have any signage that provides an indication of the operations of the proposed development. Doing this would help to mitigate impacts that may result from those who would perpetrate unlawful activities and as a result place the children of the adjacent neighborhoods at risk. • Section B, part 14, item a. The applicant is not accurately describing the surrounding vicinity. Louisa Street is not a gravel road. It is a paved road that provides access to Fredrick's street for approximately 40 parcels, approximately 25 families and 3 businesses with the available parcels to approximately double the number of residences located down that street. Further evaluation is warranted via an Environmental Impact Statement to adequately describe the environment which the proposed development is entering. • Section B, part 14, item b. The applicant did not give the accurate number of feet to the bus stop. It is exactly 611' 4" from the transit bus stop (and also school bus stop for those residing in the neighborhood). Further evaluation is warranted via an Environmental Impact Statement to adequately describe the impacts that this establishment will have on children and transit users in the neighborhood. • Section B, part 14, item d. Given the expansion of property development in the industrial area, all proposed development should also be required to mitigate their additional use by making improvement to the service access (Fredrick's Street). Currently, there are no sidewalks along the street. Pedestrians must walk in the street and, as previously spoken to, this puts them in increasing danger as traffic is increased on the street. Additionally, street lighting is needed so that drivers can see pedestrians walking along the road. These two actions would greatly increase the safety of the neighbors, children and business customers to the area. These should be included improve the walkability of the area and the safety of those walking. Finally, given the traffic increases to the area, a stop light, turn-lane or other improvements are needed to the intersection of the highway and Fredrick's street. Currently, the highway is almost inaccessible from Fredrick's street at times due to traffic volumes. Those generating the traffic volumes to the intersection should be putting in their fair share to address this issue with the County and the WA State Dept. of Transportation. Given these issues, an Environmental Impact Statement is needed to thoroughly describe the impacts that this establishment will have the access infrastructure and upon others who use that access. • Section B, part 14, item f. I would be curious to see the analysis of the expected operation and scenarios used to derive the estimate. That statement does not adequately address the final part of the question. What predictive models were used? I would expect the number of trips to roughly be double those numbers on average. Additionally, I would expect that the number of peak trips would be known, especially during harvest time as truck traffic would increase for shipping. As stated 4 previously, the increased traffic will make access to the HWY more congested and difficult. Measures should be put into place to address this issue. An Environmental Impact Statement is needed to detail the models used, their appropriateness and whether or not measures need to be taken to mitigate those impacts. • Section B, part 14, item h. The response to the question is wholly inadequate. There will be added congestion at the intersection of the Hwy and Fredrick's. How will that be controlled? Encouraging people to bicycle is not a mitigation measure. It is an educational campaign. What measures will be put into place to reduce or control the transportation impacts? How will being stuck behind a truck of compostable waste material at the intersection be addressed? How will being behind a number of cars at the end of the day, or at lunch, be addressed. Being an avid bicyclist is not realistic nor an appropriate response. An Environmental Impact Statement is needed to detail the impacts and whether or not measures need to be taken to mitigate those impacts. • Section B, part 15, item a. The second part of this question was not answered by the applicant. How and under what circumstances would fire and police services be needed? State Liquor Control Board requirements (other than the fence) are responsive security measures intended for the investigative purposes post crime. They don't reduce or control the crime from happening in the first place. Again, except for the fence. An Environmental Impact Statement is needed to detail the extent of services need and whether or not measures need to be taken to mitigate those impacts. Given the location and nature of the proposed operation, I would suggest that a paid security service personnel be on site. That would be an effective means to reduce the impacts to public service. Also, going beyond code to install fire suppression systems in the building would be a great step to help curb the impact of fire protection services. In closing,thank you for the opportunity to comment. I hope that these comments have provided some assistance to the SEPA Official for the process and some insight into further mitigations and reviews that should be needed for this application to be processed further. As it stands, I do not believe that the applicant has accurately completed the SEPA Checklist, nor to I think that the applicants operations are demonstrative of a Determination of Non-Significance given the inaccuracies in this checklist and the commonly known aspects of their proposed operation. I would encourage the SEPA Official to seek further information via an Environmental Impact Statement. The outstanding questions and impacts are of sufficient character to require a thorough evaluation of alternatives to the proposal and the measures that can be taken to eliminate or reduce the likely environmental impacts of the proposal. Sincerely, ( Jared Keefer 121 Louisa Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 5 Joel Peterson From: Angie O'Dell <angie.n.odell@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 11:18 PM To: Joel Peterson Subject: Letter of Concern Regarding Dream City LLC - Chris and Angie O'Dell Attachments: Letter of Concern Regarding Dream City LLC -Chris and Angie O'Dell.pdf Mr. Peterson, Please see the attached letter voicing our concern for the Dream City LLC application. Thank you for your time, Chris and Angie O'Dell i Chris and Angie O'Dell 133 Sandstone Lane Port Townsend,WA 98368 (253)686-4070; (253)381-1566' Chris.odell.cs@gmail.com;angie.n.odell@gmail.com Joel Peterson Associate Planner Jefferson County Department of Community Development (360)379-4457 ipeterson@co.iefferson.wa.us January 6, 2015 Dear Mr. Peterson, Our names are Chris and Angie O'Dell, and we live with our ten month old daughter,Alexis O'Dell, in the Port Townsend neighborhood, Maplewood Meadows. We are located just West of State Route 20, off of Fredricks Street. Maplewood Meadows is a family oriented neighborhood containing 17 families, and there is currently a concerning application for a 44,000 square foot marijuana growth and distribution facility, Dream City LLC,at the entrance to our neighborhood. Thank you for hearing our concerns as we strongly oppose this application. Our foremost concern is the proximity of the proposed marijuana facility to our residential development,and the danger this brings to our neighborhood. The facility will be built roughly 300 feet from residents,and Sandstone Lane,the road that we personally live on. The application for Dream City LLC does not mention our neighborhood in an attempt to hide this serious concern. The facility also plans to be located less than 650 feet from the public school bus stop,and our students will walk directly past the facility twice a day when going to and from school. As a former Grant Street Elementary teacher, I (Angie),am very concerned for the safety of the 23 children in our neighborhood as students walk to and from the bus stop. The Washington State Liquor Control Board has requirements that marijuana facilities be placed at least 1000 feet from elementary schools,daycares, playgrounds, recreation centers, libraries,and game arcades. These requirements are in place to protect the safety and quality of life of community members,families, and children. However,the Washington State Liquor Control Board does not currently have any requirements for the distance from residential developments,school bus stops,and the roads that children must walk. Your best judgment must currently be used to make these decisions. The fact that any distance requirements exist show that these facilities bring concern to families and children. We urge you to help protect the safety and quality of life of our families and children by considering the distance of this large marijuana facility from residential neighborhoods. The Washington State Liquor Control Board requires marijuana facilities be surrounded by an eight foot tall,visually obscured fence,topped with barbed wire. It also requires many surveillance video cameras that must continuously record the entire perimeter of the facility,and flood lights that will light the facility 24 hours a day. These requirements are in place because the Washington State Liquor Control Board understands marijuana facilities bring an increase of crime. In addition to this, because marijuana production is still prohibited by the federal government, all monetary transactions will be made in cash,without the ability to place this money in a bank. The large amounts of cash held at this facility make it an even higher target for crime, which will inevitably seep into our neighborhood. The large size of this facility will greatly increase the traffic of both small commuter vehicles and large delivery and semi-trucks, evidenced by Dream City LLC's plans for a 14 car parking lot. Without a sidewalk this brings a danger to students walking to and from the bus stop located at the corner of Fredricks Street and State Route 20. This intersection is already busy,and with the increased traffic,the wait time for entering State Route 20 will become a problem. The increased wait time is dangerous because drivers will be encouraged to enter State Route 20 more impatiently. Dream City LLC should be required to include a sidewalk and a stop light in their application. Please consider the impact Dream City LLC will have on the lives of the families living in close proximity to the application site,and do not approve their application. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Chris and Angie O'Dell Joel Peterson From: rodys@olypen.com Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 11:18 AM To: Joel Peterson Subject: Land Use Application Comments I understand that a very large cannabis growing and processing plant to be built on the corner of Fredrick and Louisa Streets in Port Townsend is in the final approval stages. I am opposed to this project site. It will consist of about 40,000 square feet of offices, processing buildings and enclosed greenhouses, on about 2 acres of land. This is to be built next to a large residential neighborhood on the south side, Maplewood Meadows. I am a long-time resident of this neighborhood. There are also residential structures north of the site. It is approximately 650 feet from a school bus stop and a public transport stop on Highway 20, and less than 1,000 feet from the Larry Scott Trail. I have no objection to a cannabis business. I object to any large commercial enterprise being located next to this established residential area. This business will be about 600 feet from residential property on Louisa Street, and about 450 feet from residential property on Sandstone street. Louisa and Fredrick Streets are narrow and have no sidewalks. Louisa Street is the only access to our neighborhood. Twenty-three children live in Maplewood Meadows. All are under high school age and most have to walk north on Louisa and then east on Fredericks to the school bus stop. Louisa Street is the only access to our neighborhood. The intersection between Highway 20 and Fredrick Street is already dangerous; the additional traffic from the initially proposed 14 employees and the supply and transport trucks will add to this danger. I am also concerned about the increased problems of neighborhood security, disposal of waste materials, odor problems, herbicides and pesticides possibly going into groundwater, decreased residential property value, and visual impact. State regulations require that the site be surrounded by eight foot fences topped by razor wire with bright floodlights This will greatly affect the residential neighborhood. Currently there are nine active permits or permit applications for cannabis businesses on the east side of Route 20, in a business park with only minimal residences. It is not a good idea for this additional business to be situated on the west side of Route 20, in close proximity to residential neighborhoods, instead of on a site such as those available in the industrial park on the east side of the highway. 1 Joel Peterson From: ryan.barnard@gmail.com on behalf of Ryan Barnard <ryan@rnbarnard.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 7:46 AM To: Joel Peterson Subject: Letter concerning MLA14-00090 for parcel 948601301 Attachments: Letter to Jefferson County Department of Community Development.pdf Dear Mr. Peterson, Please see the attached letter(in PDF file format) - it is a letter written by myself and my wife regarding permit application MLA14-00090 for parcel #948601301. Thank you very much, Ryan Barnard ryan@rnbarnard.com 425-239-9435 i From: Ryan & Nicole Barnard 155 Louisa Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 ryan@rnbarnard.com To: Joel Peterson Associate Planner Jefferson County Department of Community Development jpeterson@co.jefferson.wa.us My family and I would like to express some concerns regarding permit MLA14-00090 concerning the Dream City, LLC marijuana production facility to be built at 192 W. Fredericks Street(Parcel 948601301): 1) On page 30 of the application, it describes"South of Fredericks, Louisa Street is a gravel road providing access to several parcels along Sandstone Lane and Pebble Lane." This is not only factually incorrect, but is also misleading. Louisa is a paved road, leading to a neighborhood of 17 families(with 23 children with age ranges from infant to high school), and 10 more residential lots available. Fredericks Street provides the only outlet for the neighborhood,which could potentially cause the following issues: a. Children walking to the school bus will walk by this facility every day.We fear for their safety as that time of the day is dark, and generally when a shift change occurs and there is an increase in traffic. b. The closest bus stop that services the Maplewood Meadows neighborhood is located at the intersection of Fredericks Street and Highway 20, requiring everybody to walk by the facility. We propose that Dream City, LLC would be required to put in a sidewalk system and light poles to mitigate the danger posed to the children and public transit commuters. 2) Also on page 30 of the application it explains "Approximately six to ten vehicle trips per day...". We learn on page 28 of the application that there will be "about 4 people present at any one time", but the business would employ up to 14 people. We do not believe that a realistic number of vehicular trips per day will be 6 to 10, but that it will be much higher than that. With just 4 employees coming and going each day,that puts the number of trips at 8, minimum. It would be a safe assumption that there will be the occasional errand or going out to eat for lunch (as there are no nearby restaurants)that pushes 4 employees to over 10 trips per day. Taking into account that they only say 4 present at a time, but will employ up to 14 people total, that dramatically increases vehicular traffic to over 30 trips per day.And it still does not account for bringing in larger trucks to import materials,export product,and export hazardous waste material. The intersection of Fredericks Street and Highway 20 is already a very challenging intersection due to the amount of traffic, and I frequently have waited behind multiple cars for many minutes to get out onto the Highway. I fear that with all this added traffic,the delay to leave the neighborhood, and the danger of doing so, will be significantly increased. We propose that Dream City, LLC would be required to finance a traffic light at the intersection of Fredericks Street and Highway 20. 3) Crime opportunity.We recognize that this business may be attractive to potential burglars, and as such may require extra patrols from law enforcement. We suggest that the business move over to the East side of Highway 20,where there are already similar facilities.That will localize the facilities to an area that can be more easily patrolled. If the facility is not moved, however,then we would like to require the business to not post any signage identifying the facility,so as to reduce the knowledge of its presence in our neighborhood. In conclusion,we are very concerned that either the application was not fact checked and contains additional errors like what has been addressed above in points 1 &2, or it deliberately contains incorrect information. Both possible cases are very alarming. Without knowing much about air pollution, but knowing that greenhouses will need to be ventilated, we wonder if their claims of no air emissions (page 23) are true. Similarly, can we believe their claims that the groundwater will not have any issues, even after whatever herbicides and pesticides they will be using? We strongly urge that this application is put under strong scrutiny to ensure that they have no other false claims. Additionally,we strongly urge that for this application to be allowed, our suggestions listed above are enforced upon Dream City, LLC,so that all the nearby families and children they are building nearby are kept safe. Thank you very much for your time, Ryan &Nicole Barnard Joel Peterson From: Scanlon Aliya <aliyas13@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 2:55 PM To: Joel Peterson Subject: Proposed Marijuana Facility on Louisa Street Attachments: dcd.doc Dear Mr. Peterson: Attached please find our letter highlighting our concerns about the proposed facility on Louisa and W Fredricks Streets. Thank you for your time. Aliya Crawford 1 January 5, 2015 To: Joel Peterson jpetersonaco.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County Department of Community Development From: Jason& Aliya Crawford Re: Proposed marijuana growing facility on Louisa Street Dear Mr. Peterson: Our family resides in the residential development known as Maplewood Meadows, off Louisa Street. It has recently been brought to our attention that there is an permit application in your office for a marijuana growing facility at the intersection of Louisa and West Fredricks Streets. We are writing you to voice our concerns and express our opposition to this facility. We understand that following recent changes in state law that this facility is entirely legal, but we take issue with the proposed location for a large variety of reasons, as we will state hereafter. First, and foremost, our greatest concern is regarding the(currently) 23 children that reside within our residential area, also noting that with about 10 residential lots left to be built on, the number of children will likely increase significantly. The proposed facility is located just next to the children's school bus stop as well as the Jefferson County transit stop. This means our children will be walking past this facility multiple times every day. There quite a few safety issues associated with that, among them- -the current minimal neighborhood traffic realizes children of varying ages may be on foot, but the increase in business traffic to the proposed facility could prove dangerous without any sidewalks for pedestrians. -increased potential for criminal activity given the nature of the facility. -concern about distinguishable levels of odors drafting from the facility during growing and drying of marijuana that could be intoxicating to our kids. Additionally,the increase in vehicle traffic is a concern at both the site (Louisa and W Fredricks) since this is the ONLY access to our residential neighborhood, as well as at the intersection of W Fredricks and SR20, which is an already overtaxed corner. The application does not mention much in the way of environmental concerns, such as use of herbicides in the growing operation that may affect local groundwater issues. Finally, with the entrance to our residential and family-oriented community being at Louisa and W Fredricks, we have concern regarding what signage the facility would be allowed to have, and how the security requirements such as high intensity lighting and high fencing will affect the look and feel of this entrance. We hope the county is considering how a marijuana growing operation in our backyards affects our daily life, our peace of mind, and our impressionable children. Thank you for your attention to our concerns. Sincerely, Jason&Aliya Crawford 36 Cottage Place Port Townsend WA 98368 aliyas 13(&,yahoo.com 360-774-6502 Joel Peterson From: Carl Piehl <carlpiehl@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 11:33 AM To: Joel Peterson Subject: Dream City LLC Proposed Growing and Processing Hi Joel Peterson, I know that the 1-502 act allowing the legal growing and processing of marijuana is relatively new. What I find hard to understand is how a facility like the one on 192 W Fredericks is allowed to operate there, given the large number of children currently and potentially passing by the corner of the Louisa and Fredericks right across from the company on the way to the bus stop. In this housing development, Maplewood, unfortunately the only way in and out by Louisa is onto W Fredericks. There are, at this time, some 23 kids ranging in age from 1 to 15 years old with only 3 of them in their early teens. There also are 2 young kids at the end of West Fredericks. We also have 10 vacant buildable lots that will no doubt add to the number of kids. We have 3 houses on Sandstone that have 5 kids currently, all within 400 to 600 feet of the proposed marijuana facility. As a parent, I am concerned what chemicals they will be using. I have read that this type of operation produces hazardous materials that are normal trucked away. I don't see anything mentioned if this is true. There are some points that I would like to make regarding the outlined "SEPA Environmental checklist for Oct 29th 2014" that looked to be wrong or suspicious. I have walked and looked at this parcel in detail, late in 2014, as I was gonna buy the place but was outbid. Page 3, Sec B, a & b, the land has a large drop off in the middle running north. I would estimate the drop to be in the range of 20 ft at the back of the property. The maximum slope right now is much higher than 4 to 6% as stated. Page 3, Sec B, e, "No Offsite fill is anticipated to be required." The forementioned drop off will take far more than 500 cubic yards to fill, and offsite fill will be needed. This drop off covers more than 60% of the land. The only flat spot is the driveway and the existing building site. On the north side of the land, a retaining wall will be needed and a way to deal with the run off. Page 4, Sec B, 2-b, when asked about emissions or odor, they marked "None Known." I cannot believe there will no odor. Have you been down wind of any one with pot? You can smell it even in small amounts. Given the size of this operation, there must be some odor, and I would like to know how they will deal with it. Page 5, Sec B, 3-2, the septic was designed for a 2 person house. They state they will not have more than 14 employees at one given time. This does not address the 4 additional owners or visitors. Also given the fill being added to raise the ground level, current septic will be far below the grade level. Page 5, Sec B, 3-c, Water Run off. I don't see any plans to deal with the large buildings and the resulting run off. Page 11, Sec B, 14-a, it states that the South of Federicks& Louisa Street is a gravel road. This is not true. Louisa St is a paved road and providing access for 17 houses. Page 11, Sec B, 14-b, the distance from the school bus stop/Jefferson Transit stop is 650 ft not 800 ft as stated. Page 11, Sec B, 14-f, if they will have 14 employees and no one leaves for lunch or breaks, they will have 14 vehicle trips not including deliveries and pick ups. Not the 6 to 10 they stated. To summarize, as one of the residents in this community where the marijuana growing/processing is said to be put in, we asked that this be disallowed as it impacts the residents, particularly the growing kids in the area that would be walking by this operation each day they go to school. Thank you for your time to read over my thoughts. Carl Piehl 123 Sandstone Ln. 1 Joel Peterson From: Michael Dam <drmichaeldam@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 11:08 PM To: Joel Peterson Subject: MLA14-00090 -- public comment Attachments: SEPA comment MRA14-00090.docx Joel, Attached is a letter I have written to comment on the proposed grow facility on 192 W. Fredericks St. Michael Dam 1 January 5, 2015 Attn: SEPA Joel Peterson, Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development RE: MLA14-00090 I am commenting regarding the proposed marijuana growing facility at 192 W. Fredericks St. in Port Townsend. I reside in the residential community directly adjacent to this property at 21 Balsa St. I am concerned about this project for several reasons and to my knowledge writing this letter is the only way for me to comment on this project. My top concern is regarding the safety of my two daughters, Elly and Daniela. They are 2 of 23 children who reside in the Maplewood Meadows residential community. My children will need to walk on Louisa and Fredericks Street to catch the school bus and I am concerned about the increased traffic. They will have to walk past this facility at least twice daily during the school year. Louisa street is the ONLY access to the neighborhood. I am also concerned that WSLCB allows this type of facility in such close proximity to a residential neighborhood and a school and Jefferson Transit bus stop. To my knowledge, the proposed grow facility is under 600 feet from our residential neighborhood and under 700 feet from the bus stop. In reading the SEPA checklist I discovered the applicants made no mention of the residential neighborhood adjacent to their proposed project. A second concern is the possible impact to the air quality, specifically the odor of the cutting and drying process. Will permitting be required to ensure the safety of any emissions and to help control odor problems? It has come my attention that there are already 9 approved or pending grow operations on the opposite side of Highway 20 in Glen Cove. Why not cluster these similar businesses in the same area instead of allowing this project adjacent to a residential community with many families with small children who need to walk, play, and catch the school bus less than 1000 feet from this facility. Perhaps a decade ago, before the residential development, a project like this one would make more sense. However, the character of this area has changed dramatically and is now dominated by its residential character with many young children and families. Another concern is the increased traffic for the required employees and transport of supplies and material via trucks to and from the facility. It poses yet another safety hazard as there are no sidewalks for our children to walk on when catching the school bus. It is also very difficult to make left hand turns from Fredericks street onto Highway 20. This dangerous intersection will only become more so with the increased traffic. There is also low visibility with no streetlights in the area. The applicant has underestimated the likely increase in traffic. The impact of this project and its size is significant and will impact the traffic flow and safety of the neighborhood. Will the project be required to provide improvements to protect pedestrians in this residential area ?The SEPA checklist application also inaccurately reported in the transportation section that Louisa Street is a gravel road south of Fredericks that provides access to "several parcels" on Pebble and Sandstone Lane. In fact, it is paved and provides access to the Maplewood Meadows residential neighborhood of 17 occupied homes and 10 lots for future residential development! Finally, I do have some concern about the possible impact in crime in the area. I know these grow facilities area a new endeavor to the state and the possible impacts in crime are likely unknown at this time. However, I am concerned about its impact on my family and the families of this neighborhood. The need for secure fencing and high intensity lighting around the property may cause "light pollution" in the area and negatively affect the overall appeal and character of the community. Again, I believe the WSLCB needs to reconsider allowing these operations in such close proximity to residential areas. There are other sites and properties much better suited to this kind of facility where its potential impact on residential neighborhoods, children, safety, and transportation are negligent. Please consider these comments and I respectfully ask that SEPA disallow this grow operation for the reasons cited about. Dr. Michael Dam A concerned resident at 21 Balsa Way in the Maplewood Meadows neighborhood. Joel Peterson From: Kim Gordon <gordonkm54@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2015 8:41 PM To: Joel Peterson Subject: Re: Marijuana Processing Facility Attachments: Marijuana Facility Planning letter 1-4-15.doc Joel, The letter I sent had an incorrect date. Here is a copy with a January date on it. Kim Gordon On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Kim Gordon <gordonkm54@gmail.com>wrote: Dear Joel, Please read the attached letter expressing our concern regarding the application of a Marijuana Processing Facility at the corner of Frederick and Louisa Streets, bordering the residential area of Maplewood Meadows. Thank you, Kim and Jay Gordon 425-894-4494 Kim 1 January 4, 2015 Joel Peterson Associate Planner Jefferson County Dept of Community Development Dear Joel, This letter is to register our strong objection to the application for the marijuana growing/processing operation on the corner of Frederick Street and Louisa Street, Port Townsend. We feel that the applicant has significantly minimized the description of, and foreseeable impact to,the Maplewood Meadows subdivision, which is less than 500 feet from the proposed grow operation. Maplewood Meadows is a community made up of 17 family residences and 10 undeveloped residential lots. We are a close-knit community, proud to have a range of ages.There are a few senior citizens, but most of the neighborhood is comprised of young families. There are currently 23 children living in this neighborhood, ranging in age from infant to grade school.The proposed grow operation is located less than 650 feet from a school bus stop and Jefferson County Transit stop. The children will be walking from their homes down Louisa Street and along Frederick Street at least twice daily, passing the grow/processing operation. There are no sidewalks on these streets, which will expose the children to increased truck and vehicle traffic on Frederick Street and introduce undue safety risks. The applicant refers to Louisa Street south of the site as a gravel street connecting with Sandstone Lane and Pebble Lane. In fact, Louisa is a paved street and the only access route into and out of our neighborhood. (There is also no mention of all the other streets in the neighborhood that the grow operation will directly impact.) We can expect increased truck maneuvering when these vehicles inadvertently enter our street. We don't think you have looked into the impact these elements will have on the increased wait times at the intersection of Frederick Street and Route 20.To mitigate each of these risks, it should be a requirement for a sidewalk to be installed on Frederick Street and a four-way traffic signal to be installed at the Frederick Street/Route 20 intersection due to the increased traffic and congestion. We are aware that there are additional waste products and odor generated by the operation. Will ORCCA permits be required to monitor and manage odor? How will waste products be managed, and what additional vehicle traffic will this generate on Frederick Street? Where will employees park?Will they park along Frederick Street, further risking the safety of our citizens walking to and from the bus stops?The facility has an almost prison-like appearance, with its 8-foot-tall fence topped by razor wire. This, along with the high-intensity security lighting,will draw attention to the facility and may pose security risks to the neighborhood. We understand there are currently two marijuana facilities and nine active permits on the east side of Route 20 in the Glen Cove area. We strongly request that the commission require all marijuana operations be sited in a contiguous area and away from a residential zone.This would improve access for commercial purposes, prevent the introduction of increased vehicle traffic into the Maplewood Meadows community, reduce the inherent risks to a residential zone, and better protect our property values. Each of us in the neighborhood works and contributes locally. We see this area as a wonderful place to raise our families. Please take this objection and larger issue to heart and reconsider the situation in these early stages so that the right decisions are made for the best interests of all the individuals involved, not just the applicants. Yours truly, Kim and Jay Gordon 153 Louisa St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-385-1769 (home) 425-894-4494(Kim cell) 425-241-2050(Jay cell) Emails: gordonkm54@gmail.com jdg.luthier@gmail.com Joel Peterson From: Peter Davis <pete@petedavisconsultant.com> Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2015 7:41 PM To: Joel Peterson Subject: Tier Ill Application: MLA14-00090 Attachments: Letter to JCDCD.docx Dear Mr. Peterson: l am a resident and property owner in the Maplewood Meadows neighborhood, situated just south of the Port Townsend city boundary, immediately west of State Route 20. I am writing as an interested party in the DCD approval process for a proposed marijuana grow facility, identified as case number MLA14-00090. As I understand it,there will be no public hearing on this project. Therefore I am submitting my comments in the attached letter. Please see that my letter is entered into the record. Thank you. Peter C. Davis 130 Louisa Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 -- (Mailing Address: 2023 E Sims Way,#327, Port Townsend, WA 98368) Cell Phone: 360-531-1995 1 January 4, 2015 Mr. Joel Peterson Associate Planner Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Reference: Marijuana Growing/Production Facility Application MLA14-00090 Dear Mr. Peterson: I am a property owner and resident of Maplewood Meadows, a neighborhood that is situated at the southern edge of Louisa Street, south of its intersection with Frederick Street. There are 17 occupied residences in this neighborhood, as well as 10 additional lots for future residential development. There are 27 adults and 23 children residing here. I have reviewed two documents that have a bearing on the marijuana growing facility that has been proposed for the intersection of Louisa Street and Frederick Street: • The application that was filed with Jefferson County Department of Community Development by Marc Hilt on October 30, 2014; and • The text of Chapter 314-55 WAC: Marijuana Licenses, Application Process, Requirements, and Reporting as taken from the Washington State Liquor Control Board's web site. In light of these two documents, coupled with personal observations about the site, the road patterns, and the nearby residential neighborhood, I have a number of concerns. 1) There appear to be a number of errors in the application, errors in fact or in assumption. a) First, the applicant states that Louisa Street south of the site is a gravel road providing access to several parcels along Sandstone Lane and Pebble Lane. In fact, Louisa Street south of the proposed site is not a gravel street leading just to Sandstone and Pebble Lanes; it is a paved street serving a total of 17 occupied residences. b) Second, the applicant states that there are no environmentally sensitive areas on or adjacent to the site. It is my understanding that this area is designated as an aquifer recharge location, which suggests possible contamination by groundwater from the site. c) Third, the applicant states that there are no noxious weeds or invasive species on or near the site. In fact, the area is rife with Scotch Broom - along both Frederick and Louisa Streets, within but a few feet of the project area. d) Fourth, the applicant states that there will be no type of light or glare. In fact, because this is a Tier III application, there will be high intensity lights aimed as such to provide light to the entire site as one of the security measures required by the WSLQB. e) Fifth, the application states that the Larry Scott Trail is 1,000 feet north of the site. In actuality, the trail is situated about 650 feet north of the site as the crow flies. f) Sixth, the applicant states that the area is served by Jefferson Transit which runs buses along Highway 20, approximately 800 feet from the site. In fact, not only does Jefferson Transit run buses on Route 20, but also they have a bus stop at the intersection of Frederick Street and Highway 20. Further, this distance is not 800 feet; rather it is 647 feet from the site to the bus stop. g) Seventh, applicant states that approximately six to ten vehicle trips per day will be added to the existing traffic count along Frederick Street. In fact, based on their own estimate of employee count, and assuming that each employee will drive to work, leave for lunch, return from lunch, and leave for the day, and factoring in a minimal number of trucks, this seems like an abnormally low estimate for the increase in traffic along Frederick Street. h) Eighth, the applicant states that the project will minimize police protection impacts. In fact, given the security requirements of the WSLQB (and the corollary assumption that this will be an area with a high chance for crime), I would be most surprised if there is only minimal impact on the Jefferson County Sheriff's Department. I would suggest that the JCDCD get input from the Sheriff's Office on this matter. 2) Louisa Street is the only access into and out of our neighborhood; anyone coming to or leaving a residence in Maplewood Meadows must travel along both Louisa Street and Frederick Street, passing through the intersection that abuts the site. Further, the beginning of our neighborhood is only 585 feet south of the site on Louisa Street. This is a street that also is used by our children as they walk to and from the school bus stop, located at the Jefferson Transit bus stop. As such, our children will pass within 30+/- feet of the site at least twice a day on school days. In addition, many of the parents in our neighborhood encourage their children to play outside - and as all streets in our neighborhood are dead-end, most days see our children playing outside (bikes, skateboards, playing tag, etc.) rather than playing video games inside. 3) There are currently 2 active and 7 proposed marijuana growing licenses for properties in the Glen Cove Business Park east of Route 20. The main part of the business park is a non-residential area, in which these other licenses will likely have no impact on residences. We ask the question: Why allow a large (44,000 sq. ft.), Tier III operation across Route 20, on the extreme west side of the business park, in close proximity to a residential neighborhood, transit stop and school bus stop, when there is already a concentration of like uses in the main part of the business park away from residential areas? 4) We are concerned about the odor that will emanate from this production facility. In conversations with a Port Townsend police officer who has participated in numerous marijuana drug raids, he indicated that there is no way such a facility will not smell. 5) We are concerned about security in the vicinity of our neighborhood, and the potential for increased crime. We have been advised that this type of business will be a cash-only business; as such, we see the proposed facility as a more desirable target of burglary, robbery, etc., and its impact on our neighborhood. In conclusion, I am very concerned about the reduction in quality of life that this project would bring about. Whether it be in relation to the influence on and safety of our children, the additional traffic on what has been essentially a residential street, the increased congestion brought about at the intersection of Frederick Street and State Route 20, the fortress-like appearance of such a facility in our neighborhood, the varying amounts of odor we will smell, the relatively close proximity to both a public transit stop and a school bus stop, the close proximity to a residential neighborhood, or any of the other points brought about in this letter, we are concerned not only about the impact on our quality of life, but also the reduced interest in the remaining 10 lots in our subdivision. The Washington State Liquor Control Board has established a number of guidelines regarding the location of marijuana grow facilities. But having spent considerable time evaluating the current application before the DCD, I have come to the conclusion that the WSLQB has not gone far enough in its marijuana grow location requirements and limitations. This seems particularly true with respect to proximity to residential neighborhoods, proximity to school bus stops and walkways to them, concentration of like- operations in one place rather than scattering them about, etc. As such, it behooves the powers-that-be at the County level to take such steps as are necessary to protect the health and well-being of its residents. This is not just a safety issue — it is a quality of life issue. Therefore, I ask that the Department of Community Development deny this application, at least for this location. Thank you for your consideration. Peter C. Davis Residence: 130 Louisa Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 Mailing Address: 2023 E Sims Way, Port Townsend, WA 98368 Cell Phone: 360-531-1995 Joel Peterson From: Peter Davis <pete@petedavisconsultant.com> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 6:56 PM To: Joel Peterson Subject: MRA14-00090 Application -Additional Comments Mr. Peterson: To what extent do errors and questionable "facts" in the applicant's SEPA Environmental Checklist for the proposed marijuana grow facility bear on the approval process as it moves forward? Or, putting it in another way, if the proposed operation ends up doing something markedly different from what they say they will do in their application, what recourse is there on the part of the County and its governing bodies (DCD, Environmental and Water Quality, etc.)? In reviewing the SEPA part of the application, there seem to be several inaccuracies that convey something other than what will likely be the case. I would be happy to meet with you at your convenience, in order to discuss these concerns that I did not address in my earlier letter to you. Thank you. Peter C Davis 360-531-1995 1 ✓" January 12, 2015 To: David Sullivan, Jefferson County Commissioner Phil Johnson, Jefferson County Commissioner Kathleen Kler, Jefferson County Commissioner Philip Morley, Jefferson County Administrator Carl Smith, Director, Jefferson County DCD 1/Joel Peterson, Jefferson County DCD Associate Planner From: Peter Davis, a Jefferson County resident Subject: Attached Documents (2) I appreciate having had the opportunity to speak at the two most recent BOCC Meetings, and realized that I could have (but didn't) submitted hard copies of my comments to you. Please excuse this oversight on my part, and accept these hard copies of those comments. Thank you. rr Sincerely, J"" 1 2 2015 it j Peter C. Davis 130 Louisa St, Maplewood Meadows, Port Townsend, WA (physical address) 2023 E Sims Way, #327, Port Townsend, WA (mailing address) Cell Phone: 360-531-1995 w ITEMS FOR BOCC MEETING 1/ 12/ 15 My name is Peter Davis, and I reside at 130 Louisa Street just south of the Port Townsend city limits. I spoke to you last Monday, and wanted to clarify a couple of my comments. First, however, I want to publicly thank Kathleen Kler for taking time out of her busy schedule to come to our neighborhood, to see for herself the situation about which I spoke last week. I only hope that the other two commissioners will take the time to visit our neighborhood as well, so they can relate first-hand to the situation we face in our neighborhood. While I spoke to a number of specific concerns last week, I appear today not to re-iterate those concerns, but rather to prevail on the Board to take it upon themselves to protect the residents of Jefferson County from what can only be considered oversights of both the WSLCB and the Jefferson County Code. These oversights have no doubt been brought about by the state's urgency in developing a set of rules and regulations with regard to the legalization of marijuana, as well as the county's unfamiliarity with such a product as marijuana in terms of regulating its growing and processing facilities within the context of our county zoning laws. NECEM �, � iii JAN 1 2 2015 12, JE FEitSO OU41Y ?1F7�4F CCM liNiTYDEVECOPMENT r Specifically, I am asking the Board of Commissioners to look closely at two primary areas of concern : the proximity of such facilities from school bus stops, and the proximity of such facilities from residential areas. The standard cited by the WSLCB is that marijuana growing and processing facilities should be at least 1,000 feet from schools, parks, playgrounds, recreation areas, arcades, and public transit centers. I am asking that this standard of 1,000 feet also be extended by Jefferson County to include school bus stops and residential neighborhoods, regardless of the zoning designation in which the facilities are located. I know that there is a big discussion going on now, and is yet to be resolved, concerning whether or not marijuana is to be considered an agricultural crop; this is one of the factors that has been taken under advisement during the moratorium. In my opinion, and by virtue of the WSLCB, the definition of marijuana has already been distinguished from other agricultural products - and as such needs to be regulated accordingly with whatever safeguards are necessary. Finally, this is the chance for Jefferson County to get it right - to derive a workable plan for the administration of this new industry called marijuana in such a fashion as to be a successful venture within our county, without any undue negative impacts on the health, well-being and happiness of its residents. While I empathize with those business-persons who are curre - •�• , ,_ he moratorium, I would urge the i) �J =m -- f g pial the JAN 1 2 2015 \'I , J „u1!41) i c)r r,,.j,.11(pr1 / /5-11 Hello - my name is Peter Davis. I reside at 130 Louisa Street, just south of the Port Townsend city boundary, and just west of State Route 20. I live in the Maplewood Meadows development, a neighborhood of 17 occupied homes and 10 lots for future residential development. I am here, along with some of my neighbors, to register opposition to the 44,000 sq. ft. marijuana growth and distribution facility that is proposed for an intersection that is very near our neighborhood. We are addressing you today because the application for this Tier III marijuana operation will not have the benefit of a public hearing. The Maplewood Meadows neighborhood exists less than 600 feet from the proposed grow operation. This is a significant distance, since the Washington State Liquor Control Board has chosen to require distances of at least 1,000 feet from elementary or secondary schools, playgrounds, recreation centers, child care centers, public parks, public transit centers, libraries, or game arcades with no age restrictions. But the WSLCB does not impose any limitations or minimum distances from a residential neighborhood, a transit or school bus stop, or a street along which school children walk. In fact, the school children in our neighborhood must walk directly through the intersection of Louisa Street and Frederick Street, the intersection abutting the proposed site. In our opinion, this is a serious oversight on the part of the WSLCB. Many of my neighbors, along with myself, have written letters to the Jefferson County Depa I .z • - ,' rn Y Development, which I understand to h e ` " inaI s in k JAN 1 2 20! ;;,; ir:}11TY approving the application. I have also written a letter to the Washington State Liquor Control Board, relative to its basis for issuing the Tier III license application. We have a number of objections to the proposed grow facility in our neighborhood which we have included in letters to the DCD. These include its distance from our neighborhood (585 feet), the fact that the only access into and out of our neighborhood is through the intersection that abuts the site, the fact that just over 50 people live in our neighborhood (including 23 children between the ages of 1 and 18, with those of school age having to walk through this intersection on their way to and from the school bus), the fact that both Jefferson Transit and school buses have regular stops at the intersection of Frederick and Route 20, (less than 650 feet from the proposed site), the fact that the application makes absolutely no reference to the fact that there is a residential development nearby, and so forth. Finally, there are currently 2 active and 7 pending marijuana grow operation license applications for the Glen Cove Business Park east of Route 20, as well as this application on the west side of Route 20. At 44,000 sq. ft., this will amount to site coverage of over an acre, making it one of the larger, if not the largest, grow facility in the area. For these, and many other reasons, I ask the question, "Why here, next to our neighborhood, instead of across Route 20 with the other similar business;.. E c E o M �� 1 I JAN 1 2 2015 1 L IkJFFRS6NCDCOUOEVENTY _.DEPT.Oa P.1MUf4ITY IOPMENT I respectfully ask that the Board of Commissioners consider the health, well-being and quality of life of our neighborhood, and disallow this Tier III grow operation from the proposed site at Frederick and Louisa, as it has been requested in MRA14-00090. Thank you for your consideration. FECEIlVE1 11 JAN 12 2015 JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Joel Peterson From: Jody <jodyjoc@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2015 7:34 PM To: Joel Peterson Subject: FW: Proposed Dream City LLC Marijuana production facility (Application #MLA14-00090) IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD Categories: Public Comment It appears the address I used in my original mailing was incorrect. Below is a letter of concern regarding the proposed Dream City LLC Marijuana production facility(application #MLA14-00090). From: Jody [mailto:jodyjoc@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 02, 2015 1:58 PM To: 'jpeterson@jefferson.wa.us' Cc: 'PB@liq.wa.gov'; 'TAD@liq.wa.gov'; 'XFG@liq.wa.gov'; 'KM@liq.wa.gov'; 'VBS@liq.wa.gov'; 'RAL@liq.ws.gov'; 'TDM@liq.wa.gov'; 'SKG@liq.wa.gov'; 'RJJ@liq.wa.gov'; 'KAH@liq.wa.gov'; 'JFCO@liq.wa.gov'; 'JHLEW@liq.wa.gov'; 'MWS@liq.wa.gov'; 'SMT@liq.wa.gov'; 'DWT@liq.wa.gov'; 'Scott.Wernecke@liq.wa.gov'; 'maureen.malahovsky@Icb.wa.gov' Subject: Proposed Dream City LLC Marijuana production facility (Application #MLA14-00090) IN MY NEIGHBORHOOD Dear Mr. Peterson, I am writing to you in regard to the Dream City LLC application for a proposed marijuana growing and packaging facility at the corner of Fredericks Street and Louisa Street in Port Townsend and have copied members of the Liquor Control Board who are listed online as serving Northwest WA. This proposed facility would be located LESS THAN 600 FEET from my property, my HOME in the Maplewood Meadows neighborhood of Port Townsend. To say I am concerned would be an understatement. While my home is just beyond the Port Townsend city limits, it is situated within a viable FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD of 17 homes,with 10 additional home building lots available for other families. Currently, our neighborhood consists of many young families with over 20 children. The application grossly understates the impact of its location at the corner of Fredericks and Louisa Streets,for instance, stating that Louisa Street is a gravel road connecting to residential lots on Sandstone and Pebble. In fact, Louisa Street is where my house is located.The road is paved and,yes, it does connect to Sandstone and Pebble as well as Balsa Way. While Sandstone and Pebble are currently gravel, they already house many families who are as close, if not closer than my home is,to the proposed pot facility. These are not LOTS, as stated in the petition. We are an established thriving family oriented neighborhood. Most of the homes have been here for more than five years, some closer to ten. While the neighborhood has grown up adjacent to commercial zoning, we members of Maplewood Meadows are anxious to participate in the county's 2015 comprehensive plan to place barriers between our neighborhood and commercial zoning. However, in the meantime we are faced with the proposal from Dream City LLC, and potentially others, and we need your help to stop this type of industry within our neighborhood. Also grossly understated in the proposal is the impact on Fredericks Street leading into and out of our neighborhood— the ONLY ingress/egress the 17 families in Maplewood Meadows have to Route 20. A company growing and processing would surely have trucks coming into and out of the neighborhood often, bringing supplies in, carrying product out. And while the applicant states that employees will be encouraged to ride bikes, there is certainly no guarantee that will happen at all. Currently,the entrance onto Route 20 from Fredericks is challenging during much of the day. Any additional commercial traffic would burden this intersection greatly—to the point that some major changes to this intersection would be needed to keep this intersection safe—traffic light or roundabout,for instance. Also,the short stretch of Fredericks between the proposed facility and Route 20 (650 feet—and not 800+stated in the application) is 1 the same stretch that children in our neighborhood must walk to meet their school buses. The bus stop—650 feet from the proposed facility is also a Jefferson County Transit stop. Currently there is no sidewalk or street lighting on this road and safety of our children is of the utmost importance. It should be high on the county's priority list also. Why is it necessary to put a marijuana facility in my neighborhood when there are NINE applications either currently approved or awaiting approval for similar facilities in the business park across Route 20? It is my understanding that there is even more land available across Route 20, should this industry need room for growth. I am begging the county and the Liquor Control Board to block this petition. Please keep this new industry from encroaching into family neighborhoods! To recap in bullet form, here are my concerns: Location abuts a viable family neighborhood —Proposed site is less than 600 feet from my property as well as many other families. More than 20 children currently reside in this neighborhood. Commercial sites with much less impact to families are available on the other side of Route 20. Impact on Fredericks Street—The only ingress/egress to the family homes in the Maplewood Meadows neighborhood is via Fredericks off of Route 20.This is also the entrance proposed by the petitioner. Increased traffic would cause safety hazard to the more than 20 children currently living within this neighborhood who must walk to the bus stop. Increased traffic would increase safety hazard for all vehicles exiting the neighborhood onto Route 20, precipitating a need for either a traffic light or roundabout. Additional concerns that would impact our neighborhood: Odor/Air Pollution from the facility. Our neighborhood held a meeting with a city police officer in attendance. He stated that odor is detectable outside of buildings with just a few marijuana plants growing.The proposed operation would have many plants, much odor that would impact our quality of life within Maplewood Meadows neighborhood. In addition, I have a concern for quality of air in general. Can we be assured that future business at this location would not include venting from processes that could include harmful chemicals? Will ORCCA permits be mandatory? Will there be monitoring on a regular basis? Do we know the long term effects of inhaling marijuana pollen on young developing brains/lungs? Is it really worth the lives of 20+children to risk it? Light pollution—The state guidelines for marijuana facilities call for high fencing and security lighting. While I would like to believe that the high fencing will block the bright lights needed to keep this facility secure, I highly doubt that 8 foot high fences will begin to hide the lights. Many lighting options available commercially also create a humming sound that could impact quality of life in our neighborhood as well. What guarantees do we have that light and sound will not bring further negative impact to our neighborhood? Ground water implications—How can we be assured that herbicides, pesticides, chemical fertilizers, etc. will not be used? What about chemicals used in hash oil extraction, should the company grow to include additional marijuana services? We are a neighborhood very concerned with the health and safety—current and future—of our children and pets. How can we be assured that our groundwater remains unadulterated?The specs included in the petition were vague, at best, in regard to any water issues including usage and drainage. Increased fire hazard in our neighborhood -What kind of safety features must be in place to ensure that drying facilities are not fire hazards? Are grow lights, drying lights, etc. monitored in any way? Will the facility be allowed to provide additional services in the future which could include use of flammable substances for extracting hash oil, for instance? Increased crime in our neighborhood—I understand this is a new industry and there are many unanswerable questions, however, I would be remiss if I did not state that there is a strong current of concern throughout my neighborhood regarding the increase in crime related to the marijuana growing facility. While company owners may undergo strict background checks, we have no assurances that employees as well as other servicing this facility are reputable. 2 Traffic impact throughout the neighborhood—I've already addressed my concerns for traffic on Fredericks, but there is also a concern for increased traffic through our family neighborhood where children play—vehicles making wrong turns, vehicles seeking out a second exit that does not exist. I strongly urge you to stop the development of marijuana facilities in my neighborhood.While the petition appears to be for a site on the edge of a commercial business park, it is in reality abutting a viable,growing family neighborhood that has been in place for many years. Every member of this neighborhood must drive past the proposed property to get to our homes. You are the governing authorities. I LIVE HERE. This simply is NOT the business that best serves this area. Respectfully, Jocelyn Davis 130 Louisa Street (Mailing address: 2023 E. Sims Way,#327) Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone: 360-531-1996 Email: iodyloc@gmail.com 3 Joel Peterson From: Carley Anderson <carley@carleyanderson.com> Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2015 10:43 AM To: Joel Peterson Subject: West Fredricks St. "Dream City LLC" Marijuana Site Proposal Categories: Public Comment Joel Peterson, Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development, My name is Carley Anderson and I live at 151 Louisa St,in the neighborhood of the proposed Dream City LLC development. I have several concerns about the facility applying to set up at the entrance to our neighborhood. The Dream City LLC applicant refers to Louisa Street as a "gravel road" (not true) and there is no mention of our established neighborhood existing here. The only way into our neighborhood is past the Dream City LLC site. My husband and I moved to Louisa Street in 2006 with our first daughter. We bought a nice new home when there were four other households in the area. Now there are at least 20, and all but one are custom-made, solid houses. This is a close neighborhood,with over 20 children among us, and we are hoping that the remaining 10+ lots will eventually sell to round out the development. I am concerned that the proposed Dream City,LLC site will deter potential investors/homeowners, and perhaps even cause the exodus of several current neighbors. Jefferson County DCD Mission:To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy,sound communities and a healthy environment I understand there are currently nine applications pending for marijuana growing/processing facilities across the highway in the larger industrial zone. It seems to make more sense to keep the sites in one area, as part of an industrial community. West Fredricks St is zoned industrial,but the tide has turned around it and residences are popping up on all three sides. If Dream City is allowed to set up on West Fredricks,what is to stop others seeking to capitalize on I-502 from setting up alongside them? There are a few vacant light industrial lots on West Fredricks. If this becomes the newest marijuana growing/processing strip,it could potentially choke out our neighborhood, and also the neighborhoods to the North and West. I, for one,would love to maintain a "sound community and healthy environment", "preserving the quality of life" for myself and my family here on Louisa St. I have two daughters, eight and four years old. My older daughter is in third grade and rides the school bus to Grant Street Elementary. Her bus stop is 647 feet from the proposed Dream City site, and she has to walk through the corner of Louisa and Fredricks,right past the site. As it is now, that corner is ill-maintained,part-gravel, overgrown with weeds and has poor visibility. I have concerns about an increase in delivery trucks and employee vehicles adding to the traffic and causing potential safety hazards. I also wonder about the potential employee pool of Dream City LLC and how they might interact with my young daughters. If it is law that one of these sites can't coexist within 1,000 ft of day cares,parks, etc,why is it okay to set up within a neighborhood with 20+ young children? Another concern I have is the potential odor. How is that to be monitored/permitted? Currently there is regular crime activity across the highway in the Otto Street industrial zone. Cars stolen, break-ins, etc. So far we have not suffered from this. I wonder if this Dream City LLC site would draw crime across the highway and into our neighborhood? 1 Joel Peterson From: Colin Anderson <colinoffshore@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2015 4:24 PM To: Joel Peterson Subject: Concerned resident- Ref. MLA14-00090 Dream City Attn: Development Review Division I am writing to express my concerns regarding the commercial marijuana growing and process facility proposed by Dream City LLC at 192 W. Fredricks Street in Port Townsend. (Ref. MLA14-00090 Dream City) The fact that this growing facility will be located on the corner of the only access to our neighborhood seems to have been largely ignored in the initial permit applications that I have read. I'm a current resident of Louisa Street which in the SEPA environmental checklist is described as a gravel road providing access to several parcels and local dead-end streets. Louisa Street is in fact a paved road and leads to a number of residences many of which have small children- there are about 20 children currently living in our neighborhood. This leads me to my greatest concern regarding this facility. I have an eight year old daughter, who- along with other neighborhood children- will need to pass by this facility each week day to gain access to the school bus stop. There's a good reason why this type of facility is not allowed to be established within 1000 feet of a school, a playground or day care center, yet it appears fine to be established within 1000 feet from a school bus stop and on a road that children must walk along to get to their homes. (The school bus stop is situated about 650 ft from this facility on Highway 20.) I also have concerns regarding the security of our neighborhood. It's my understanding that the facility will need a large 8' fence, with lighting and 24hr surveillance. If these measures are required by the State then it would appear they are concerned about the security of this type of facility. I'm concerned there could be an increase in crimes of opportunity in and around our neighborhood as a result of this facility being established. I also have concerns regarding the increase in traffic along W. Fredricks Street as a result of this facility, especially with our children walking along this road on a daily basis. It is also the only road we have to access the Larry Scott trail, which many residents use as a form of recreation. It would be best if a side walk were created on W. Fredricks to make it safer for pedestrians using it. Additional lighting would also be of great benefit for the safety and security of those walking along W. Fredricks Street. Finally I have some environmental concerns. What type of odor will be created during the processing of the marijuana? Will the air quality be regulated?What type of pesticides will be used and will the final run off be checked to ensure the local environment is not being affected by these chemicals?Also, it's my understanding that waste from this type of facility is considered "hazardous". That concerns me -how will it be handled and will it affect local residents in any way? From talking with other residents, there is definitely a legitimate feeling of concern in our neighborhood, especially among families with young children. Some are concerned that no one will want to move to this neighborhood as a result of a marijuana growing facility being established at its entrance. Others are concerned about the value of their property as a result of this facility. Some feel it would be best suited if this type of facility be established in the light industrial area on the east side of Highway 20 where similar growing facilities are being proposed. There are a lot of questions being asked and I trust these concerns of mine will be considered during the review of this permit application. Yours sincerely, 1 / J /5 RLejf fcdrosa_ ( -44,70,z4/ _ 0(57 R)7 w7 J /- 1' e �� �i / /lei reiti-TM D e /ci,2 77) A-Jr y f ��,,, �; bnyD, N� 4d go, �hA// ' 406'i-ess dot 7a401vseivc71 444) 3 /J � 7 \t4rr't-) 74.4W1-1 1.;,1. 11 �-, -A-7- `�J r'� ee t_. -1A-1 afty IA05 4'04 ' 1-'1 n I V5 �� Uri ,, 024( ( .671))'`'`ns- 0\lrua6(y Vgr`a I 1E0E0V E JAN - 6 2015 JEFFERSON COUNTY _ DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Joel Peterson From: timruybalid@yahoo.com Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 11:28 AM To: Joel Peterson Subject: RE: Notice of Application and Agency Review Request--Dream City LLC marijuana production facility Mr. Joel Peterson, I own my primary residence at 131 Louisa Street, Port Townsend with my wife and six children who are all under ten years of age. After reading the application from Dream City LLC and looking at the plan it looks like they have completely omitted the fact that their site is directly adjacent to a residential development,with a large number of families with young children. Louisa Street is accessed only by first turning onto Fredericks Street from Highway 20 and many children that live here attend Port Townsend public schools and walk to the school bus that picks them up on the corner of Fredericks and Highway 20. If there is going to be an increase of vehicle.traffic on Fredericks Street then there will be a need for stop signs and/or a stop light on Highway 20 and possibly on the corner of Fredericks and Louisa and sidewalks on Fredericks Street. In addition to the children walking to and from the bus there is all the residential vehicle traffic that must come through the corner of Louisa and Fredericks plus the commercial vehicle traffic from Hope Roofing & Construction, Westside Marine, personal and commercial storage units located on Louisa and all the recreational pedestrian traffic to access the Larry Scott trail. There are many residential lots that are either for sale or being prepared for building of private homes so the residential community will continue to grow and increased traffic related to construction will also need to be taken into account. My children are being taught at home through the Quilcene School District home school program, PEARL, so they, along with many other small children (our neighbors), are in the neighborhood full time riding their bikes around home, to and from the Larry Scott trail, and playing from house to house. I'm not sure if this technically qualifies my home as a childcare facility, but the very fact that there are at least 20 children living within few feet or yards of the proposed site should give the county pause before approving a marijuana growing and wholesale facility that will be surrounded with razor wire and dramatically increase commercial vehicle traffic. Please consider my input and I would ask that this application be rejected due to the adjacent residential community with numerous children and the lack of infrastructure to support the massive increase in commercial activity. Respectfully, Timothy Ruybalid, NMLS#651550 Branch Manager US Bank-Quilcene Office 14890 Center Road P.O. Box 460 Quilcene, WA 98376 360.765.3361 360.765.3895 Fax 360.774.1760 Cell 800.872.2657 24 Hr Customer Service timothy.ruybalid@usbank.com 1 Joel Peterson From: timandmarionruybalid@gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 1:09 PM To: Joel Peterson Subject: Re: Marijuana facilities in Jefferson County within 1000 feet of school Thanks Joel, I appreciate you sharing that. Tim From: Joel Peterson Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 1:00 PM To: timandmarionruybalid@gmail.com Cc: Carl Smith; mjretail@liq.wa.gov Subject: RE: Marijuana facilities in Jefferson County within 1000 feet of school Mr.Tim Ruybalid: I have attached a past communication with the Washington State Liquor Control Board (WSLCB)on this topic. According to WSLCB, home schooling is not covered under the definitions and purpose of the 1000-foot exclusion zones for marijuana facilities. The complete Washington Administrative Code implementing the rules of Initiative 502 (recreational marijuana) can be found at the Washington State Legislature web site at Chapter 314-55 WAC—"Marijuana Licenses,Application Process, Requirements,and Reporting". Thank you for your inquiry. Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend.WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 j peterson Aco.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From:timandmarionruybalid@gmail.com [mailto:timandmarionruybalid@gmail.com] Sent:Wednesday,January 14, 2015 12:32 PM To: mjretail@liq.wa.gov Cc:Joel Peterson; Carl Smith; Kathleen Kler; David Sullivan; Phil Johnson Subject: Marijuana facilities in Jefferson County within 1000 feet of school 1 Good afternoon, I live near Port Townsend in Jefferson County and I'm writing to inform the Liquor Control Board that there are proposed marijuana production facilities within 1000 feet of a Quilcene School District home school program facility, see attached. According to the Liquor Control Board this is not allowed. Please take a look at this situation and contact the Jefferson County Planner, Joel Peterson, and Carl Smith, the director of the Department of Community Development for more information. Regards, g , Tim Ruybalid 360-774-1760 2 Transfer Agreement https://eds.ospi.k12.wa.us/choicetransfer/TransferAgreement.aspx?tL.. Choice Transfer Request Date: 6/4/2014 School Year: 2014-2015 Dominic D Ruybalid Status: Accepted Start Date: 9/1/2014 Status date: 6/5/2014 End Date: 8/31/2015 Resident School District Nonresident School District Port Townsend School District Quilcene School District 1610 Blaine St. PO BOX 40 Port Townsend, Washington 98368 QUILCENE,Washington 98376-0040 Superintendent: David Engle Superintendent: Wally F. Lis Choice Coordinator: Mary Colton Choice Coordinator: Christina Ware Email: mcolton@ptschools.org Email: cware©glsd.wednet.edu Phone: Phone: Fax: Fax: Current or last school attended: None New Kindergarten Requested School: PEARL Requested Program: Phone (1): Birth Date: 5/25/2009 Grade Level: K Email; timothy.ruybalid®usbank.com360-774-1760 Parent/Legal Guardian: Timothy Ruybalid Phone (2): 360-765-3361 Th Residence Address Mailing Address 131 Louisa Street 1.31 Louisa Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Reason for request; The student's financial, educational,safety, or health conditions would likely be improved. Reason for denial: Reason for rescindment: Behavior 1. Does the student have a record of conviction of crimes, violent or disruptive behavior or No gang membership? 2. Has this student been expelled or suspended for more than 10 consecutive days? No 3. Has the student repeatedly failed to comply with requirements for participation In an No online school program, such as participating in weekly direct contact with the teacher or monthly progress evaluations? 4. Has the student and/or parent had any formal meetings with school officials regarding No school attendance issues In the past two years? 5. Is this student under a court order to attend school or is a truancy petition in the No process of being filed? • 1 of 1 6/5/2014 9:13 AM Transfer Agreement h.ttps://eds.ospi.kI2.wa.us/choicetransfer/TransferAgreement.aspx?tI... Choice Transfer Request Date: 6/4/2014 School Year: 2014-2015 Elliana T Ruybalid Status: Accepted Start Date: 9/1/2014 Status date: 6/5/2014 End Date: 8/31/2015 Resident School District Nonresident School District Port Townsend School District Quilcene School District 1610 Blaine St. PO BOX 40 Port Townsend, Washington 98368 QUILCENE, Washington 98376-0040 Superintendent: David Engle Superintendent: Wally F. Lis Choice Coordinator: Mary Colton Choice Coordinator: Christina Ware Email: mcolton@ptschools.org Email: cwarec glsd.wednet.edu Phone: Phone: Fax: Fax: Current or last school attended: Quilcene-PEARL Requested School: PEARL Requested Program; Birth Date: 10/19/2006 Grade Level: 2 Email: timothy.ruybalid©usbank.comPhone (1): 360-774-1760 Parent/Legal Guardian: Timonthy Ruybalid Phone (2): 360-765-3361 Residence Address Mailing Address 131 Louisa St. 131 Louisa St. Port Townsend,WA 98368 Port Townsend, WA 98368 eason for request: The student's financial, educational, safety, or health conditions would likely be improved. Reason for denial: Reason for resdndment: Behavior 1. Does the student have a record of conviction of crimes, violent or disruptive behavior or No gang membership? 2. Has this student been expelled or suspended for more than 10 consecutive days? No 3. Has the student repeatedly failed to comply with requirements for participation in an No online school program, such as participating in weekly direct contact with the teacher or monthly progress evaluations? 4. Has the student and/or parent had any formal meetings with school officials regarding No school attendance issues in the past two years? 5. Is this student under a court order to attend school or is a truancy petition In the No process of being filed? I of 1 6/5/2014 9:13 AM Transfer Agreement https://eds.ospi.k I2,wa.us/choicetransfer/TransferAgreement.aspx?tI.,. Choice Transfer Request Date: 6/4/2014 School Year: 2014-2015 Joel E Ruybalid Status: Accepted Start Date: 9/1/2014 Status date: 6/5/2014 End Date: 8/31/2015 Resident School District Nonresident School District Port Townsend School District Quilcene School District 1610 Blaine St. PO BOX 40 Port Townsend, Washington 98368 QUILCENE, Washington 98376-0040 Superintendent: David Engle Superintendent: Wally F. Lis Choice Coordinator: Mary Colton Choice Coordinator: Christina Ware Email: mcolton@ptschools.org Email: cware@gisd.wednet.edu Phone: Phone: Fax: Fax: Current or last school attended: Quilcene-PEARL Requested School: PEARL Requested Program; Birth Date: 8/4/2005 Grade Level: 3 Email: timothy.ruybalid@usbank.comPhone (1): 360-774-1760 Parent/Legal Guardian: Timothy Ruybalid Phone (2): 360-765-3361 Residence Address Mailing Address 131 Louisa Street 131 Louisa Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Port Townsend,WA 98368 Reason for request: The student's financial, educational, safety, or health conditions would likely be improved. Reason for denial: Reason for rescindment: Behavior 1. Does the student have a record of conviction of crimes, violent or disruptive behavior or No gang membership? 2. Has this student been expelled or suspended for more than 10 consecutive days? No 3. Has the student repeatedly failed to comply with requirements for participation in an No online school program, such as participating in weekly direct contact with the teacher or monthly progress evaluations? 4. Has the student and/or parent had any formal meetings with school officials regarding No school attendance Issues in the past two years? 5. Is this student under a court order to attend school or Is a truancy petition In the No process of being filed? 1 of I 6/5/2014 9:1/ Ouilcene School District-PEARL Program-Alternative Learning Education(Off-Camuus Pro¢ram2 I, STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING: In accordance with the Alternative Learning Experience Implementation Standards—reference WAC 392-121-182(3)(e)prior to enrollment parent(s)or guardian shall be provided with, and sign documentation attesting to the understanding of the difference between home-based instruction and enrollment in an alternative learning experience(ALE). Provided on this form are summary descriptions of the difference between Home-based Instruction and an ALE. Please read these description and sign below indicating that you understand. HOME BASED INSTRUCTION: • Is provided by the parent or guardian as authorized under RCW 28A.200 and 28A225.I010 • Students are not enrolled in public education • Students are not subject to the rules and regulations governing public schools,including course,graduation,and assessment requirements. • The public school is under no obligation to provide instruction or instructional materials,grant credit,or otherwise supervise the student's education. ALTERNATIVE LEARNING EXPERIENCE—The PEARL Program • Is authorized under WAC 392-121-182 • Students are enrolled in public education either full-time or part-time. • Students are subject to the rules and regulations governing public school students including course,graduation,and assessment requirements for all portions of the ALE. • Learning experiences are: o Supervised,monitored,and evaluated by certificated staff; o Provided via a written student learning plan; o Provided in whole or part outside the regular classroom. PART-TIME ENROLLMENT OF HOME-BASED INSTRUCTION STUDENTS: Home-based instruction students may enroll in public school programs,including ALE programs,on a part-time basis and retain their home-based instruction status. In the case of part-time enrollment in ALE,the student will need to comply with the requirements of the ALE written student learning plan and annual assessment,but not be required to participate in state assessments or meet state graduation requirements. I have read the above summary of home-based instruction and alternative learning experiences provided and I understand the difference between home-based instruction and the alternative learning experience program in which my child is enrolling,I have read and understand the program information in the PEARL Handbook. I am enrolling my student as a: X Full-time student in PEARL. (1.0 FTE—my child will be required to take the"Smarter Balanced"Assessment) Part-time ALE student (.80 FTE or less—my child will NOT be required to take the state test but will do an annual assessment) PEARL FTE:_ Shared student (QSD will share the student with another school district)District Name: FTE: IL THE ROLE OF EACH PARTICIPANT IN THE PEARL ALTERNATIVE LEARNING PROGRAM: CERTIFICATED STAFF RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. Identify appropriate Essential Academic Learning Requirements(EALR's)and/or Grade Level Expectations(OLE's)for the student 2. Develop the Student Learning Plan together with the parent and student. 3. Identify and help to provide appropriate instructional materials. 4. Assess the success of the Student Learning Plans and student achievement in accordance with the state rules as adopted by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. 5. Refer students not substantially successful to other courses of study. 6. Document contact as required by state law. PARENT RESPONSIBILITIES: I. Supervise and assess daily student progress, 2. Document time spent on the Written Student Learning Plan(WSLP)activities. 3. Keep student records and samples of work completed. 4. Take primary responsibility for the student's education and provide instruction in accordance with the WSLP. 5. Assure appropriate behavior for students attending all activities/field trips. 6. Accompany students on field trips or make special arrangements with the PEARL coordinators. 7, All non-consumable items remain the property of Quilceue School District and MUST BE RETURNED when the purpose has been met or upon exiting the program. STUDENT RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. Ask questions so the staffheachers can assist you. 2. Keep school materials in good condition 3. Master the Essential Academic Learning Requirements(EALR's)and/or Grade Level Expectations (GLE's) associated with the Written Student Learning Plan in a timely manner on the computer program entitled WINOS. 4. Complete and document sufficient hours of school work each week to maintain adequate progress and the fulfillment of course contracts. 5. Attend scheduled meetings and participate in the field trips that you and your family want you to participate in. 6. Demonstrate appropriatebehaviorduring activities/field trips. Parent Name(please print) / /4 Ti Q ) /lasy 4/'d pp Student(s)enrolled in program(please print) £1!,0/l1(4 /<Hl�, /'d PARENT SIGNATURE: I f?i14_,- ' R en DATE: 9" 7? 'y 8 Ouilcene School District-PEARL Program-Alternative Learning Education(Off-Campus Program) L STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING: In accordance with the Alternative Learning Experience Implementation Standards--reference WAC 392-121-182(3Xe)prior to enrollment parent(s)or guardian shall be provided with, and sign documentation attesting to the understanding of the difference between home-based instruction and enrollment in an alternative learning experience(A1.F). Provided on this form are summary descriptions of the difference between Home-based Instruction and an ALE. Please read these description and sign below indicating that you understand. HOME BASED INSTRUCTION: • Is provided by the parent or guardian as authorized under RCW 28A.200 and 28A.225.1.010 • Students are not enrolled in public education • Students are not subject to the rules and regulations governing public schools,including course,graduation,and assessment requirements. • The public school is under no obligation to provide instruction or instructional materials,grant credit,or otherwise supervise the student's education. ALTERNATIVE LEARNING EXPERIENCE—The PEARL Program • Is authorized under WAC 392-121-182 • Students are enrolled in public education either full-time or part-time. • Students arc subject to the rules and regulations governing public school students including course,graduation,and assessment requirements for all portions of the ALE. • Learning experiences are: o Supervised,monitored,and evaluated by certificated staff; o Provided via a written student learning plan; o Provided in whole or part outside the regular classroom. PART-TIME ENROLLMENT OF HOME-BASED INSTRUCTION STUDENTS: Home-based instruction students may enroll in public school programs,including ALE programs,on a part-time basis and retain their home-based instruction status. In the case of part-time enrollment in ALE,the student will need to comply with the requirements of the ALE written student learning plan and annual assessment,but not be required to participate in state assessments or meet state graduation requirements. I have read the above summary of home-based instruction and alternative learning experiences provided and I understand the difference between home-based instruction and the alternative learning experience program in which my child is enrolling.I have read and understand the program information in the PEARL Handbook. 1 am enrolline my student as a: Full-time student in PEARL (1.0I•1E.--my child will be required to takethe"Smarter Balanced"Assessment) 1 Part-time ALE student (.801-Tb or less—my child wit/NOT be required to take the state test but will do an annual assessment) PEARL k I L:_ Shared student (Q$D will share the student with another school district)District Name: FTE: H. THE ROLE OF EACH PARTICIPANT IN THE PEARL ALTERNATIVE LEARNING PROGRAM: CERTIFICATED STAFF RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. Identify appropriate Essential Academic Learning Requirements(EALR's)and/or Grade Level Expectations(GLE's)for the student. 2. Develop the Student Learning Plan together with the parent and student 3. Identify and help to provide appropriate instructional materials. 4. Assess the success of the Student Learning Plans and student achievement in accordance with the state rules as adopted by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. 5. Refer students not substantially successful to other courses of study. 6. Document contact as required by state law. PARENT RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. Supervise and assess daily student progress. 2. Document time spent on the Written Student Learning Plan(WSLP)activities. 3. Keep student records and samples of work completed. 4. Take primary responsibility for the student's education and provide instruction in accordance with the WSLP. 5. Assure appropriate behavior for students attending all activities/field trips, 6. Accompany students on field trips or make special arrangements with the PEARL coordinators. 7. All non-consumable items remain the property of Quilcene School District and MUST BE RETURNED when the purpose has been met or upon exiting the program. STUDENT RESPONSIBILITIES: I. Ask questions so the staff/teachers can assist you. 2. Keep school materials in good condition 3, Master the Essential Academic Learning Requirements (EALR's) and/or Grade Level Expectations (GLE's)associated with the Written Student Learning Plan in a timely manner on the computer program entitled WINGS. 4. Complete and document sufficient hours of school work each week to maintain adequate progress and the fulfillment of course contracts, 5. Attend scheduled meetings and participate in the field trips that you and your family want you to participate in. 6. Demonstrate appropriate behavior during activities/field trips. Parent Name(please print) 11'A/to-' R btlIrd Students)enrolled in program(please print) k.1)eI 4.9 , lid PARENT SIGNATURE: x .1/14 ' rl 7 DATE: 7 .23-/fif B Ouilcene School District-PEARL Prov-am-Alternative Learning Education (Off-Campus Program) I. STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING: In accordance with the Alternative Learning Experience Implementation Standards—reference WAC 392-121-182(3)(e)prior to enrollment parent(s)or guardian shall be provided with, and sign documentation attesting to the understanding of the difference between home-based instruction and enrollment in an alternative learning experience(ALE). Provided on this form are summary descriptions of the difference between Home-based Instruction and an ALE. Please read these description and sign below indicating that you understand. HOME BASED INSTRUCTION: • Is provided by the parent or guardian as authorized under RCW'28A.200 and 28A.225.1010 • Students are not enrolled in public education • Students are not subject to the rules and regulations governing public schools,including course,graduation,and assessment requirements. • The public school is under no obligation to provide instruction or instructional materials,grant credit,or otherwise supervise the student's education. ALTERNATIVE LEARNING EXPERIENCE—The PEARL Program • Is authorized under WAC 392-121-182 • Students are enrolled in public education either full-time or part-time. • Students are subject to the rules and regulations governing public school students including course,graduation,and assessment requirements for all portions of the ALE. • Learning experiences are: o Supervised,monitored,and evaluated by certificated staff; o Provided via a written student learning plan; o Provided in whole or part outside the regular classroom. PART-TIME ENROLLMENT OF HOME-BASED INSTRUCTION STUDENTS: Home-based instruction students may enroll in public school programs,including ALE programs,on a part-time basis and retain their home-based instruction status. In the case of part-time enrollment in ALE,the student will need to comply with the requirements of the ALE written student learning plan and annual assessment,but not be required to participate in state assessments or meet state graduation requirements. I have read the above summary of borne-based instruction and alternative learning experiences provided and I understand the difference between home-based instruction and the alternative learning experience program in which my child is enrolling.I have read and understand the program information in the PEARL Handbook. I am enrolling my student at e: • Full-time student in PEARL (1.0 FTE—my child will be required to take the"Smarter Balanced"Assessment) Fart-time ALE student (.80 I-l'E or less—my child will NOT be required to take the state test but will do an annual assessment) PEARL FTE:_ Shared student (QSD will share the student with another school district)District Name: VIE: IL THE ROLE OF EACH PARTICIPANT IN THE PEARL ALTERNATIVE LEARNING PROGRAM: CERTIFICATED STAFF RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. Identify appropriate Essential Academic Learning Requirements(EALR's)and/or Grade Level Expectations(GLE's)for the student. 2. Develop the Student Learning Plan together with the parent and student. 3. Identify and help to provide appropriate instructional materials. 4. Assess the success of the Student Learning Plans and student achievement in accordance with the state rules as adopted by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. 5. Refer students'not substantially successful to other courses of study. 6. Document contact as required by state law. PARENT RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. Supervise and assess daily student progress. 2. Document time spent on the Written Student Learning Plan(WSLP)activities. 3. Keep student records and samples of work completed. 4. Take primary responsibility for the student's education and provide instruction in accordance with the WSLP. 5. Assure appropriate behavior for students attending all activities/field trips. 6. Accompany students on field trips or make special arrangements with the PEARL coordinators. 7. All non-consumable items remain the property of Quikene School District and MUST BE RETURNED when the purpose has been met or upon exiting the program. STUDENT RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. Ask questions so the staff/teachers can assist you. 2. Keep school materials in good condition 3. Master the Essential Academic Learning Requirements (EALR's) and/or Grade Level Expectations (GLE's)associated with the Written Student Learning Plan in a timely manner on the computer program entitled WINGS. 4. Complete and document sufficient hours of school work each week to maintain adequate progress and the fulfillment of course contracts. 5. Attend scheduled meetings and participate in the field trips that you and your}family want you to participate in. 6. Demonstrate appropriate behavior during activities/field trips. Parent �I/i b Name(please print) D Student(s)enrolled in program(please print) n)M;/-1 (C /( 't,411i c1 PARENT SIGNATURE: d N DATE: Si—.25,'- /y 8 Declaration of Intent to Provide Home - Based Instruction Quilcene School District ESD 114, Jefferson County A parent who intends to cause his/her child or children to receive home-based instruction in lieu of attendance or enrollment in a public school, approved private school or an extension program of an approved private school,must file an annual declaration of intent to do so in the format prescribed below: I do hereby declare that I am the parent,guardian,or legal custodian of the child(ren)listed below;and that said child(ren) is (are)between the ages of eight and eighteen and as such are subject to the requirements found in Chapter 28A.225 RCW, Compulsory Attendance; I intend to cause said child(ren)to receive home-based instruction as specified in RCW 28A.225.010.(4); and if a certified person will be supervising the instruction,I have indicated this by checking the appropriate box. Child(ren)'s Name(s) Grade ARC Birthdate Rkyl,� �{ 5-c:75-- ©y Eit4r) l4Z 7 �0- (7'- 7 Joe ( ieLt.JJ I Id .3 8 y. vsf Lir The home-based instruction will be supervised by a person certified in Washington State pursuant to Chapter 28A.410 RCW. Parent/Guardian Nafne Parent7Glardian Signature Date /3/ / ti S4 St . Mailing Address and Street Ad ss /3 rt 701-,7 544 4 4✓1 913-3.6 City State Zip Code This statement must be filed annually by September 15 or within two weeks of the beginning of any public school quarter,trimester,or semester with the superintendent of the public school district within which the parent resides. Send to: Pamela Mack,District Secretary Quilcene School District#048 PO Box 40 Quilcene,WA 98376 Approved By: 73l 2t)(I t{ Superintendent Date C.,,')uzI>nu W EvasogrpoloaNy Ooc WeamlFOR1431.l..me Wool:Ixem To HwrcRMal.le *r..mid Y,'s:-,;s '•y ds f ' wt,•`'� 1.' +t' '014• 1" ;..f'4 61, ' , K 1'18 *-gam" ! 9 -moi Nk 7� QUILCENE SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT REGISTRATION FORM 41 ROBOT WRITE IN SHADED AREA.FOR OFFICE USE ONLY STUDENT SCHOOL NI/MINN SCHOOL ENTRY DATE MEDICAL ALERT IIOMERDO%I NUMBER BUS ROUTE AM PM STUDENT NAME: Legal I Name Legal Firm N:une Legal Middle Name Alse known ms: Rik bA.I1 JQe— Er,' E.) h'D BIRTJIDATE( wuay'1'ear) GENDER(ti-PF) BIRTHPLACE: Coy Stmt onnUy GRADE LEVEL SL�i� s M 1.4.34-114t. & (-4-54uA• a.It4t, [ORit9/ t1el STU T IAL SECURITY 4 ETHNIC CODE(Cheek One) PRIMARY LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME US Cf1ZEN (optional) AICA-Asian or Pacific Islamic, 01-Auxsican Indian or Ahnab.Native O B-BEick.not.,f Hispanic w(Idn .1 -White,not of Hispanic origin 0 Ula id, 0 Spanish p/r`u 0 No ❑H-Ffiapamic OODar D Ukrainian Other +'� PRIMARY HOUSEHOLD (pnteMgnmdian where/Went icsirlcH PHONE EI-Home Phone PHONE(12 ((Work STUDENT LIVES WITH: L.ry Nome Ftrxt Nose pinches arca code) 0 Cell *froth parents (include area ewe) O Father only ru 'l4 -1 ,,,c'iV 360` '!ui- "5p 1‘0,76s-136) E7Mdn"dp'w* t s twrauWbtwntian vimee ilncul re,ides) PHONE d? 0 ow; 0 Falhur/siepntolhcr bol Nom.- Non Aima sell 0 Mother/Stepfather \1 �y (include arca code) ❑Srcpfaihn 0 Agency LM1•.s�+ rk M[,�' n Please eke!:if unlisted O ❑Guardian D Agency ❑Self 1 e^•�� ?>�%`??il—�7�0 other E-MAIL ADDRESS: -("l 014116.1 .f}J ft{tILO h .6:141.4.PON RESIDENT • i'Qaf /_ — v rIA'' l'tmJ ,,,})� &toe OVP ADDRESS 41i -F•Nt� N\ I' +L`4bu toil- ftS).3.65 MAILING •Dread t 7 'may API r PO liar City Saar ZIP ADDRESS -O QOX (SO.? 5 of r�,�.,' frodi ohosc v lt••' ( -t,-, Cf ' Tamp*law). -�1 !�+—'^'-•' SECOND HOUSEHOLD (ron-custodial tnDent not residing ivitlt su deal) PHONE 41•Hoare Phone PHONE 42 0 Work 0 Call RELATIONSHIP: Ito,Nose Fen;Noma (include aro code) (include arca code) 0 Both parents 17 Fabler only El Mohler only ❑Grandparents (non-custodial parent not residing with student) PHONE 42 O Work O Cell ❑lralBertSlepmwher Lot Nome lanae Maus (include area code) 0 MoileriStepf-vinr ❑Stepfather/Stepmother Please cheek if uatismed Q 0 Guardian 0 Agency 0 Self O Ober E-MAIL ADDRESS: SECOND.HOUSEHOLD.ADDRESS (N/re,r 7O Bus,('urn,arms,ZiP) ADDITIONAL MAILINGS REQUESTED ❑Yes Ct No SCHOOL PREVIOUSLY ATTENDED SCHOOL DISTRICT PREVIOUSLY AT TENDED PREVIOUS SCHOOL LOCATION(Cit}and State) l.ecio-fi ck_ A,tertts'( Chrm-tt l$Cr $4Altc t£c,1 HAS STUDENT EVER ATTENDED IF YES.NAME OF SCHOOL AYTENI)ED DATE ATTENDED Nola/Year) DID STUDENT ATTEND DI III.ONESCI IMP.DISTRICT?❑Yes Iglu PRESCHOOL? ❑Yes Riga HAS THE STUDENT EVER BEEN SUSPENDED FOR A WEAPONS VfOLAT101,42 0 Ycs Oto Dae: IS 11lUR1 A JOINT-CUSTODY OR PARENTING PLAN IN EFFECT? ❑Yes K'No (lives.plan nmst he on file with the school rat enforcement) IS TIIEItE A RESTRAINING ORDER IN EFFECT? 0 Yes liko tit'yes.teem maters must Ix on file with IIs*drool for enforcement) Resat ail11111:Inlet n against 0 Mother Q Fader 0 Uder__ HAS YOUR CHILD EVER BEEN ENROLLED IN A SPECIAL ED PROGRAM', O Yes Nisi() HAS YOUR CHILD EVER PEEN RETAINED? HAS YOUR CI IILD EVER MAD A.104 PLAN? 0 Yes (. ten 0 Yes ihiCiNn HAS YOUR CHILD EVER PA RTICPATED IN 0 TalcA U I..AP ❑Gilled O ESL D Otter_ ,- __ If yen,at oleil grade lochs) VERIFICATION OF INFORMATJON: The information on this form is true and accurate as of this dale. f understand that falsification of infornralion to achieve enrollment or assignment may be cause for revocation of the student's enrollment or assignment to a school in the Quilcene School District. Legal Parent/Guardian Signature _ ' Date II9 ib-10)41 Additional registration iuforonrdoo on bad/t.., . i DOES STUDENT ATTEND CHILD CARE" CHILD CARE PROVIDER VSme Ad/no Pry, hwener. O Berne seWnd 0 Aller ashool O Huron not sae,scum.' l ADDrfONAL CHILD CARE ARRANGEMENTS Inose provide infnnnanor to scMad to writiop) PLEASE LIST OTITER SIBLINGS ATTENDING QUILCENE SCHOOl.DISTRICT . Lost None First Name School. Grade SPEC/al.INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING RELIGIOUS RELIEFS(Nina a proeidr inI'wmatioo to school in Iontlny) EMERGENCY MEDICAL AUTHORIZATION:I understand that in the event of accident or illness,every effort will be made to contaerparetit/guardian immediately.Wpm-mu/guardian cannot be reached,I authorize school authorities to obtain emergency care for my child. Legal Pra•enrfGaurdianSlgnarrvrb _ /' ._../-� Date 1/9/,' When injury,illness or other non-emergency situations occur involving your child,we want to be able to quickly reach families or other responsible adults.In the eventwe cannot reach a parentfguardian,please list persons you trust who are available during the day to provide care for your child, PRIMARY CONTACT War don ponmiatmrdon) RELATIONSHIP TO CHI U) PHONE a I tindnde area coda) PHONE 02 tiodWe urn coda) Lar Awe Tiro Name jit Nam CI Wok OCA' ❑Home O Work OCnn . 11e./1Asty )cLik -- 6f-Mti Ater 34.0 3n'. 3?X5 PRIMARYCONTACr ADARESS !Mal Put; Il-c nu a6I 5t \se-\` Bird Qari^'Rsta Ase. WA 93 CF. SECONDARY CYINTACT(she,Dm IMoniencal'ai RELATIONSHIP TO CIEILD PHONE aI(inofnd area node) PHONE 02 jineltak nova cpk) (110Mwr inn,Name Cl None OWadd El cell OHwtx OWork{Well SCC ARY CONTACT ADDRESS Storm (Ln .Cote. ZIP STUDENT RELEASE AUTHORIZATION:In the event that the school is unable to contact the parettt/guaidfan,I authorize that my child may be released to the person(s)listed above. Legal ParenrfGlurrdian Stgngmrr _ _/e' Date—1-1 u coed •;7 c..,4,..'. is"'2"E cFfi'. ;,`-w" �"trw,r' A. . .:, x, QUILC:ENE SCHOOL I)IS-FRICT STUDENT REGISTRATION FORM DO NOT WRITERS SHADED AREA-FOR OFFICE USE ONLY STUDENT SCHOOL NUMBER SCHOOL ENTRY DATE MEDICAL ALERT HOMEROOM NUMBER BUS ROUTE AM FM Sutton NAME: Legal last Verne Legal First Nune Legal Middle Name Also known s: Ktx.,N�a.1r d, E1 'u rep, -1-e_rack_ Ell y BIRTHDATE(M h/DayfYear) GENDER(M/F) BIRTHPLACE: ily Stale Country GRADE VEL 1oi/9/t F Fe,pi-- - nse,�d, Wil- usI4 Js--f- STUDENT IAL SECURITY It ETHNIC CODE(Check One) PRIMARY LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME Us CITIZEN (otional) AR:a-Asian or.Pacific Islander 0 I-Amerism Indian or Alaska PLativa nglnh 0 Spanish ' es 0 No R-BI k,na of Hispanic origin � ehio,not ofHispaia origin O Ukrairimh 0 Oher0N-Hispanic 0Othsr --- PRIMARY HOUSEHOLD tparent/guardian where student resides) PHONE(I-Home Phone PHONE S2 ONodc STUDENT LIVES WITH:. Last Koine First Nate (include area true) 0 Cell h parents i Uncle&area code) 0 Father only �uyall ---17<i -- 1 I -31/11-�6(? 366.765-3-6t ❑Mahe tonly rent ❑Grandparents oarentiguardian where student resides) PHONE#2 0 Work 0 Father/Stepniother Lam Noe First Name Af eu CI Mother/Stepfather C',+` Al (include area code) 0 Stepfather/Steam o her # tl. ` t g'E!1 ) /1 Pease sheet if tudisiod❑ y«_ CI Guardian O Agency Self 'I ��7—TNT/710 Other E-MAIL ADDRESS thsfa'oitn.i"+� ,togs i tiyp tl•a &.- RESIDENT .S+rect „r"- API e City Stare ZIP ADDRESS 9 —rrebutt 0 64f'7. 65- MAILING Stttiet "^'IL .1P'1 10!Mx �,rCflyJ,_/�,� t f�Stmo Cf�j ZIP �^ ADDRESS / - 1u1 I Floc& LU J' /U 36�` (trdifrereal �} j30 CSG 7S from above) SECOND HOUSEHOLD(non-custodial pared am residing with student) PHONE PI-Horne Phone PHONE 42 0 Weak ❑Cell RELATIONSHIP: Lam Mime /-trsi Nome (include area code) (include awn code) ❑Both tweets 0 Father only Motor onty I 0 Grandparents (non-custodial parent not residing with student) PHONER2 0 Work 0 Cell 0 Father/Stepmother Loss Mune Fine Now (include area code) O MahedStepfather 0 Stepfallwr/Stelmaotiur Pease cheek ifudined 0 0 Guardian 0 Agency 0 Self D Other E-MAIL ADDRESS: SECOND HOUSEHOLD ADDRESS /5ircecPP Box,.Cit);note.ZIP) ADDITIONAL MAILINGS REQUESTED 0 Yes O No SCHOOL PREVIOUSLY DISTRICT SCHOOL PREVIOUSLY ATTENDEDPREVIOUS SCHOOL LOCATION lakl• CSC - f S _ F_I(Q4G (OIL7NAME OFSCHOOLA7TENED I7ENDED Year) DID STUDENT ' E1p QUILCETEESCIOOL DISTRICT?0 Yes ko PRESCHOOL? 0YesIX2-1ITO HAS THE STUDENT EVER BEEN SUSPENDED FOR A WEAPONS VIOLATION? 0 Yes to Date 1$THERE A KENT-CUSTODY OR PARENTING PLAN IN EFFECT'? 0 Yes """ No (If yes,phut muss he on rile with the school for enforcement) Ten IS THERE A RESTRAINING ORDER IN EFFECT 0 Yes Na (If yes,lead papers must be en Ilk with the school for enforcement) Restraining ander is against 0 Mother 0 Father 0 Other HAS YOUR CHILD EVER BEEN ENROLLED IN A SPECIAL ED PROGRAM? 0 Yes KNo HAS YOUR CHILD EVER BEEN RETAINED' HAS YOUR.CHILD EVER f IAD A 504 PLAN? 0 Yes // to 0 Yes 'No HAS YOUR CHILD EVER PARTICPATEI)IN- 0 Tide 0 LAP 0 Gilled 0 ESL tJOVtier If yes,m Mat grade Ieveht) VERIFICATION OF INFORMATION: The information on this Loon is true and accurate as of this date. I understand that falsification of information to achieve enrollment or assignment may be cause for revocation of the student's enrollment or assignment to a school in the Quilcene School District. — -+• ILegal Fri en//Qurmdie n Signature `�/ ` l Dai 1 1 i/41)J )1,\ V\\`At& ‘\)\-v\ " \ dat rgistrationitfaraat)anorfb,A... DOES STUDENT ATTEND CHILD CARE? CHILD CARE PROVIDER Naze Addirss noun Mrmher ❑Reruc school 0 Aller school Cl Before and of cr school ADDITIONAL CHILD CARE ARRANGEMENTS II'Icme provide information to school in writing) PLEASE LIST OTHER SIBLINGS ATTENDING.QUILCENE SCHOOL DISTRICT Last Name First Nance School Grade SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING RELIGIOUS RELIEFS(Please provide iurormniiun to school in writing) EMERGENCY MEDICAL AUTHORIZATION: I understand that in the event of accident or illness,every effort will be made to contact parent/guardian immediately. If parent/guardian cannot be reached,I authorize school authorities to obtain emergency care for my child. Legal Parent/Guardian Stgnanlre ,fes! f ,� / Dare ref When injury,illness or other non-emergency situations occur involving your child,we want to be able to quickly reach families or other responsible adults. In the event we cannot reach a parent/guardian,please list persons you trust who are available during the day to provide care for your child. PRIMARY CONTACT(other than parendguardian) RELATIONSHIP TO CHILD 'P�HrONEm lel(include code) PHONE'2 (indn&arca code) Lrnl Nark rely Namlit Home O Work ❑Cel Cl Home Cl Work 0 Cell T�h�. 'P,--- l w1.6k'ler 3ret> -ass-3Ifa-s I'Il1MAR Y CONTACT ADDRESS Snrel Car,, Slate. LP ab StUV<P1- t' llOk i-`7241) 1 X 8 36 SECONDARY CONTACT(other hen)rarrnl guardian) RELATIONSHIP"IDU PHONE al (include ayes code) PHONE in (include area code) Lou Mrunr ripe Nnrne 0 Home Cl Work ❑Cell 0 Hertre.Cl Wool; ©Cell SECONDARY CONTACT ADDRESS Savo 0(r. S/'ure, zip STUDENT RELEASE AUTHORIZATION:In the event that the school is unable to contact the parer/guardian,I authorize that my child may be released to the person(s) listed above. /,, ' Legal Parent./Cum dinn SignatureDare ( � -/A/ Y QUILCENE SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT REGISTRATION FORM 00 NOT WRITE IN SHADED AREA-FOR OFFICE IIRF.ONLY STUDENT SCHOOL NUMBER SCHOOL ENTRY DATE MEDICAL ALERT HOMEROOM NIIMBF.R MS ROUTE AM PM STUDAITNAME: Legal Lail Name Legal First Naive Legal Middle Name Also known as: 1'(11 LI b11f'd D'41, ,<- phi/t BIRTHDATE(Mandl/Day/Yowl GENDER.(M/FI BIRTHPLACE: City State Couniry GRADE LEVEL if TR/DENT SOCIAL SECURITY a ETHNIC CODE(Cheek One) PRIMARY LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME US CITIZEN (optional) O A•Aaian or Pacific Islander 0 I-American Indian or Alaska Native _l. E!n shin ❑Oilier Erie: oNn CI tied B-Black, of Hispanic 5-While,origin5-Whilenem,nof Hispanic origin C)Ukrainian CIOilier O H-Hispanic 00s her PRIMARY HOUSE!-TOLD (parent/poi—droll where sttdenl resides) PHONE El-Home Phone PIIQNE JD O Work STUDENT LIVES WITH; l-o' Name Firs Mane (include area coda) NI irSoih parents (include urea code) O Father only R149 1041;d i1morII� 3/.0- 17y.a.o -3 so —53/-. qo3 OD MalkGe only nndparents (parenVp�� w4, diao ere sladeul resides) PHONE El O Work O Falhen'leprnollrer Last Name Fn'a Name OCell O Mother(Slepfaiber i� (include area code) O Slepfnlher/Slel nwlher !e IM ll 1. l'1/1�r1O.) Please check if unlisted❑ CI Guardian O Agency 0 Self 11 � / U , /, l `l E-MAIL ADDRESS: 't',.ni 4 e?ci Aid()IA-) /L0 5LM/,d (EKr,s-si/. rf.d1,4-1 RESIDENT Save, Ap 0 Cry S/roe ZIP ADDRESS I I) LO(AI 3q Sl rct.l' /wolf r Pict w/i- lie') MAILING $,-rf Apra 1'0 fox Clay ,Lore ZIP ADDRESS '` 1% ,/ v (If different /11 / I.t fss'\ 3r~- 1 . 7-oi.✓ "' p36� from above( JJ LD �l:[1T ....._., 1 7k, �" SECOND HOUSEHOLD (non-custodial parent nor minding with Rrndent) PHONE El-Home Phone PHONE TO 0 Work CI Cell RELATIONSHIP: law Name Fir:,Now (include arca code) (include area code) O Both parents O Father only O Mother only C Grandparents (non-cuslodiol parent not residing with student) PHONE UI O Work. O Cell O Fathed$tepnolher Last Abaie /-il.>r Nance (include area code) CI Mother/Stepfather C skpfatheasrepmodier Please check if',nailed LI O Guardian 0 Agency O Self C Oder 1 E-MAIL ADDRESS: SECOND HOUSEHOLD ADDRESS (Siren DJ 811 Cory:Sint,ZIP) ADDITIONAL.MAILINGS REQUESTED O Yes O No SCHOOL PREVIOUSLY ATTENDED SCHOOL DISTRICT PREVIOUSLY ATTENDED PREVIOUS SCHOOL LOCATION(City and Sane) HAS STUDENT EVER ATTENDED IF YES.NAME OF SCHOOL ATTENDED DATE ATTENDED(MrruWYear) DID STUDENT ATTEND QUILCENE SCHOOL DISTRICT?O Yes fJ llo PRESCHOOL? L)Yes O No HAS THE STUDENT EVER BEEN SUSPENDED FOR A WEAPONS VIOLATION? O Yes Ilf'I6 tale: IS THERE A JOINT-CUSTODY OR PARENTING PLAN IN EFFECT? O Yes 6Na Illyes.plan Heil be on file Uwithllle school for enfarcedenl) IS THERE A RESTRAINING ORDER IN EFFECT? CI Yes t),-CT� (If yes,legal papers mnsl be on file with Ilse school for enforcement) Repraining order is against: ❑Mother O Faller O Other HAS YOUR CHILL)t VER HEEN ENROLLED IN A SPECIAL ED PROGRAM? D Yes Cf-f1n HAS YOUR CHILD EVER BEEN RETAINED? HAS YOUR CHILD EVER HAD A RN PLAN? CI Yes 13 No 0 Yes Ilio HAS YOUR CHILD EVER PARTICPATED IN: O Title O LAP O Gilled O ESL O Oder !ryes,co what grade Iclef(s) VERIFICATION OF INFORMATION: The information on this form is true and accurate as of this date. I understand that falsification of information to achieve enrollment or assignment may be cause for revocation of the student's enrollment or assignment to a school in the Quilcene School District. \ l 4t Legal Parent/Guardian Signature 111=-- Date /)j /9 Addlrlonrrl registraflon Information on beck,,, DOES STUDENT ATTEND CHILD CARE? NO CHILD CARE.PROVIDER Name Address Mian Nu,th', O Reim school ❑After school O Before and aver school ADDII1ONAL CHILD CARE ARRANGEMENTS(Mass previde information to school in%oiling) PLEASE LIST OTHER SIBLINGS ATTENDING QUILCENE SCHOOL DISTRICT Last Name First Name School Grade Ailslid 1 P_t-4RL - Ail b4 I;a 11Q,1,�, r A- L / SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING RELIGIOUS BELIEFS(Please provide information to school in writing) EMERGENCY MEDICAL AUTHORIZATION: I understand that in the event of accident or illness,every effort will be made to contact parent/guardian immediately.If parent/guardian cannot be reached,I authorize school authorities to obtain emergency care for my child. Legal Parent/GuardianSignature ALA_ (/Date / —?3 -Pt When injury, illness or other non-emergency situations occur involving your child,we want to be ahle to quickly reach families or other responsible adults.In the event we cannot reach a parent/guardian,please list persons you trust who are available during the day to provide care for your child. PRIMARY CONTACT.tether than paredt/gun,Aian) RELATIONSHIP TO CHILD PHONE a I(include raca code) PHONE 01 (include area code) /As/NameFlr..r No,nr p'Honre O Work ❑Cell ❑Home laN' brk El cell baNel T•ti014S rQ -P 360- 779- 046 PRIMARY CONTACT AD RESS /SenCity. score. ZIP 131 LD,ti.y\ Sa r / 4'-r 105.c...71 /-L. 5.'7341 SECONDARY CONTACT(other than pmonigsardian) - RELATIONSHIP TO CHILD PHONE 0I (include area code) PHONE 02 (include area:code). Lor Now Finn Mayne Cl'Home OWak El Cell OHorne 13 Work OCell e •°d T�Le+ G i i 246 -mss-- P7J SECONDARY CONTACT ADDRESS Surd Clf,; We, :ZIP c1 Spur Blvd) /3rr 1,1741eflrICnCi 4J4- 4p) cy STUDENT RELEASE AUTHORIZATION: In the event that the school is unable to contact the parent/guardian,I authorize that my child may be released to the person(s)listed above. Legal Parent/Guardian Signature Ali k 106C-1- Dale 4/ -23— /y Distance from Restricted Entities Page I of I rirf Washington State -4. Liquor Control Board Published on Washington State Liquor Control Board(http://liq.wa.gov) Home>Distance horn Restricted Enldles Distance from Restricted Entities Per RCW 69.50.331(8)the board shall not issue a new marijuana license if the proposed licensed business is within one thousand feet of the following entities. The distance will be measured as the shortest straight line between the property line of the potential location to the property line of the grounds of the entities listed below: • Elementary or secondary school; • Playground; • Recreation center or facility; • Child care center; • Public park; • Public transit center; • Library; or • Any game arcade(where admission is not restricted to persons age twenty-one or older). Copyright 02015 Washington State Liquor Control Board Source URL:http:/Aiq.wa.gov/milicense/distance from restricted entities http:/iliq.wa.gov/print/5662 1/14/2015 N ° DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 i Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax:360.379.4451 L"�_0'4 ( -1 S Web:www.co.iefferson:wa,uslcomruuaityclevekTment r-1, a �j[� t. -Si'IRII:a t. • .:f:.� f, ' �.1 1� sS/1r11's/11140.c.° � _ __ \�JJ/] !,, \I t � . .: PERMIT APPLICATION I?i OCT OCT 2. 9 2014 ,,1 Steps in the Permit Process: -Review application checklist to ensure all information is completed prior to submitting aPpiicatitxrr: CO6'idUNITY DEVELOPMc"T -Make sure septic has been applied for and water availability has been proven. MLA, i 4 -(' -Make an appointment to meet with the Permit Technician by calling 360-379-4450. -This is not a standalone application;it must be accompanied by a project specific supplemental application. -Fees will be collected at intake. Additional fees may apply after review and payment is required before permit is issued. rvt{'_.�_y t 2+ H � J .n� � �j� h� p , I♦i tt �" K Y"" a 4 U � rA16U �Y 'a j' 't 'INAW �'m� 4 ,m. Hid nay mi ''im, i' .0424, �� � x t, i K 9" 1x �, ' " ;�}xr'r �� . t5„' ". y�' '1G' Y� i4v�k�, a .+6 'lfiz�(d G - S 1 J i^ ��#M=ti`k...,, %V*: t^ ^C �a' F 5 §1Wril v 9 y�m. ; 'M' +4 G.4 ..Site Information �� .F�4f,"'�`�'��,y�ty?�Ci.ikt�" "" 'M^"+� ' �ffi� !'4'm'"" ' ��`t� Assessor Tax Parcel Number: 948601301 Site Address and/or Directions to Property; 192 W.Fredericks Street;Port Townsend,WA 98368 Access(name of street(s)) from which access will be gained: Washington State Hwy 20: W. Fredericks Street Present use of property: 2,592 SF work shop used for miscellaneous light industrial maintenance. Description of Work(include proposed uses): iii ../; f t••. -. • • - ^. •• l • t I f" . • ' 111.111! . 1111. ! - / l• l I I - I • • , 1 11 " package, weigh and label cannabis under license with the Washington State Liquor Control Board. This property is served by Port Townsend of Port Ludlow sewer system? YES NO If not served by sewer identified above,identify type of septic system below: Type of Sewage System Serving Property: 1 Septic Septic Permit ft SEP02-111 Community Septic Name of System: Case#: Are other residences connected to the septic system? No Additions or repairs to sewage system: None Is it a complete or partial system installation: Complete .f Partial Has a reserve drainfield been designated? Yes No Date of Last Operations&Maintenance check: September 19,2014 Attach last report to application Describe or attach any drainfield easements,covenants or notices on title,which may impact the property: None Pvmvi 1pphc:it Par.1..12 Parcel Details Page 1 of 2 r tItT , Jefferson County t T ' *. Home :•County Info :Departments Search Parcel Number: 948601301 SEARCH Parcel Number: 948601301 Printer Friendly Owner Mailing Address: DREAM CITY LLC PO BOX 1909 RLNl 1i�1 _90 PORT TOWNSEND WA98368-0062 Site Address: 192 W FREDERICKS ST PORT TOWNSEND 98368 Section: 16 School District Port Townsend (50) Qtr Section: SW1/4 Fire Dist Chimacum (1) Township: 30N Tax Status: Taxable Range: 1W Tax Code: 0111 Plarring area:Quimper(2) Sub Division: 9486 - EISENBEIS BAY VIEW Assessor's Land Use Code: 9800 - Garages, Outbuildings, Other Imps Property Description: EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13, LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN VAC ALLEY, SOPHIA ST, & S/VAC ELWOOD ST AD] Tax.A/V.Sales.Photos.and Permit Data plda Data. ,Mao Parcel Plats&Surveys Septic Monitoring Info >¢`s' `F Jeff.: o County HOME I COUNTY INFO I DEPARTMENTS I SEARCH p. nest viewed with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 or later Windows-Mac Is http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parceldetail.asp?Parcel_NO 948601301 10/30/2014 Joel Peterson From: / Jordan Eades <marketingsmith@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 4:20 PM To: Joel Peterson Subject: In regards to the marijuana growing facility in the Louisa St Neighborhood Categories: Public Comment Joel Peterson,Associate Planner Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 Dear Mr.Peterson: The following letter is in regards to the marijuana growing facility that has been proposed for the corner of Fredericks& Louisa St.As a resident of the Maplewood Meadows neighborhood,a family community,we feel that the proposed use for this site may have a significant impact on the families and residents. The following addresses our concerns: • The Applicant refers to Louisa Street south of the site as a "gravel"street(as opposed to a paved street)connecting with Sandstone and Pebble;there is no mention of the other streets in the neighborhood,and the fact that there are currently 17 families living in the Maplewood Meadows subdivision,of which Louisa is the major access route. In addition there are currently about 10 additional lots potentially to be developed as residential lots. • The application refers to residential lots,when in fact at least 17 of these lots are private residences, with people living in them. There are about 10m additional lots that will,at some point in time, have residences on them as well. • There are currently 23 children residing in Maplewood Meadows.While some are younger than school age, many of these children must walk north on Louisa and then east on Fredericks in order to catch the school bus in the morning(and reversing this trip in the afternoons)—thus passing the corner of the applicant's property twice every weekday. The increased traffic along Fredericks thus poses an increased safety concern,especially as it will be at least partially truck traffic. • The distance to the Jefferson Transit(and school bus)stop does not appear to be anywhere near 1,000 feet; applicant states it is about 800 feet. By our measurements it was 647 ft. • The applicant seems to have underestimated the increase to traffic,and has totally ignored the increased wait times at the intersection of Fredericks and State Route 20 when turning onto Route 20. • There was very little mention of proposed herbicides, pesticides,etc.that would be used in the grow operation,especially with respect to any groundwater issues they may create. • There will likely be some odor, especially during harvest;will the applicant need to secure an ORCCA permit? 1 Currently,there are nine active permits or permit applications for similar businesses on the east side of Route 20, in a business park with only minimal residences. Why does this business have to be situated on the west side of Route 20,in relatively close proximity to residential neighborhoods,when there appear to be not only corollary businesses, but also sufficient room for it? We respectfully request that the JCDCD take into consideration the concerns of the residents of the Louisa St. neighborhoods (Maplewood Meadows),and not allow the marijuana growing facility to proceed. Sincerely, Jordan&Zach Eades Jordan Eades 360-593-4172 marketingsmith@gmail.com 2 Joel Peterson �r From: janet isherwood <isherweed@yahoo.com> Sent: y Saturday, January 10, 20155:47-PM---- - To: Joel Peterson Subject: Fredricks/Louisa proposed marijuana facilities Dear Mr. Peterson, When, like a good little liberal, I voted to legalize the possession of marijuana, I shortsightedly did not foresee that every local entrepreneur was going to try to get in on the growing and production of the stuff! Two plants already in the business area of Port Townsend, seven more applications in the pipeline and another adjoining the Maplewood Meadows residential area. "An impact is an impact is an impact"? Not so — if the state requires high-intensity lighting and 8-foot razor wire-topped fences for such facilities, it clearly expects them to have a higher impact than other regular agricultural or light industrial business. They are not the same. Yes, I have an interest in this. Last spring I helped my daughter and her family to buy a house in Maplewood Meadows; in fact I am listed on the mortgage as a co-owner of the property. They have been very happy to be in a quiet, safe neighborhood where their six children can ride their bikes and play outside with others. Since the report in last week's Leader I hear that yet another application for a marijuana business has been made, this time adjoining the other side of Maplewood Meadows. If these two applications are successful, the family will be surrounded. And who will want to buy their house if they should try to move? Do we want Jefferson to be the top-producing marijuana county in the state? Let's have some moderation and at least restrict such businesses to operate a decent distance from residential areas. That way the business owners can make their money and provide employment without creating such a negative impact on people's lives. Janet Isherwood Cape George Colony, Port Townsend 360-385-3825 i a p' tti IP Ati '4197' Ce714- 4- 7.7/(y r/274. 1,01113.4,/ I Ty acz.. f` /a L,Z,4)141to ..17.512As / .45t L44 cis-ect-f,-LkS P.eirPeler‘ cf.n...44) Y'r perzt. -- 0(5 114 4-111,SWC4N,"4.—. • C;rrgic,i Anar- leteu‘w 4-6." - r-- . 4 'Li .cLat-Ixe&3_5LadcyLoF 12{__ pervir4 iFilt-0( GP-cc-Zit) p.-.461+), Cfi.,44ftyLorin 144' 54-`".'rk4JC FelefdaulL6 Alr/se Lc 411n;S6 0-Vut, / Gel-A—c(2-111-c4- -es—I 6 Nottefartcy-,6 s 01401 licst.--G.-Asz., ciC)A9y (cf-piek-40-,) %.9 /firy-r,;(„ cielyroL, SVULAItik5 ^4 Joel Peterson From: Simon Little <simon@studio-stl.com> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 5:30 AM To: Joel Peterson Subject: Re: Results of Public Comments & Request for Additional Information Attachments: 1415_SEPA Comment Response 01-26-15.pdf Joel, Attached is the SEPA comment period response letter on behalf of Dream City, LLC. Please contact me should you have any questions or are in need of additional clarification. Thanks, Simon Little studioSTLI 360.640.8814 studio-stl.com On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Joel Peterson<JPeterson@co.jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Simon: I read through each of the public comment letters and am forwarding a scan of them for you to read. Some of the issues will need a response from your team so we can continue with the evaluation and to develop a fully mitigated project. I put the agency comment letters in the front of the stack, but there are good points in each of them. I wasn't able to effectively use comments that said something like"the project will impact our neighborhood", without the commenter stating what the specific impacts are. However,the comment letters identify areas that could use more complete information. Some that I'd specifically like more information about: • See Dept. of Ecology comments regarding Construction Stormwater Permit, Solid Waste Handling permit • See letter from Jared Keefer regarding some additional permit requirements. • Air—no mention of ORCAA air permit. What kind of ventilation filters/scrubbers are being installed? • Explain the shifts of the 14 employees in regard to trips-per-day. Lot of confusion about this. Provide your documented trip generation estimate. i • Question about septic capacity, see comments from Environmental Health Dept. regarding permitting for a kitchen. Possibly need to coordinate with EH. • More information in#7 Environmental health hazards from operation, chemicals used, disposition of wastes • #7.b. noise: backup generators?Lights emit noise? Et cetera. • Describe the aesthetics of the fence to me: is it strung barbed wire angled at the top of the fence; is it razor slinky wire like a prison perimeter? • Discuss more about lighting plans, light& glare, keeping light on property, shielding lights, security lighting reqirements • Transportation: issues are identified in the comment letters including need for road improvements, sinage improvements (`Children at Play'), adequate and accurate description of the road network and neighboring community,walking hazards, increased traffic. There appear to be existing problems where people see the project as just making worse. Please provide additional project information about trip generation, any mitigating actions, etc. See Public Works comment letter: there's a finding that the project will not impact the County road system. The 15-foot Type A Screening is going to be critically important to buffer from the residences. I encourage you to leave as much screening vegetation as you can, even in the screening along Fredericks Street, although the screen requirement is only 10 feet deep. After I receive additional information, the next step will be to write a SEPA report(DNS, MDNS,et cetera). Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson @co.jefferson.wa.us 2 DREAM CITY, LLC 192 West Fredericks St. Port Townsend,WA 98368 January 26, 2015 Jefferson County Department of Development Attention:Joel Peterson To Whom it May Concern: This document is in response to your request regarding the public and department comments on the SEPA Application for 192 W. Fredericks Street, Port Townsend,WA 98368. In support of this response please find attached the following additional documents: Attached Documents: a) Septic Analysis by Suzanne Martin b) Stipulated Judgment Quieting Title to Real Property c) WSLCB Response Letter The following response has been constructed around the original SEPA application with clarifications added wherever a pertinent comment was provided. All sections, numbers, letters,and points follow the structure of the SEPA application. Section A 6.Proposed timing or schedule Clarification: Under phase 2,task 1,a reference is made to the future vacating of Louisa Street along the Eastern property line of the property.This vacation has now occurred and was recorded November 14`h 2014.See attached document titled "STIPULATED JUDMENT QUIETING TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY". 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Clarification: In addition to the previously listed, the following are also approvals/permits that will be needed for this proposal (all applications have been submitted at this time): - Olympic Region Clean Air Agency(ORCAA) Demolition Permit Application - Olympic Region Clean Air Agency(ORCAA)Air Permit Application - Jefferson County Public Works - City of Port Townsend - Jefferson County Environmental Health Department Page I 1 DREAM CITY, LLC / Response to SEPA Application Comment Period Section B 2.Air a) What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed?If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Clarification: During construction emissions to the air will be minimal as the majority of the project is to be assembly related due to the pre-engineered greenhouses and pre-engineered steel buildings.Any particulates such as dust will be handled through typical construction management methodologies including the wetting of temporary soil stockpiles etc. Dream City LLC is working with a Mechanical Engineer to ensure the facilities ventilation and filtration systems meet or exceeds compliance with all of the regulations set forth by the Olympic Region Clean Air Agency. 3. Water a)Surface Water: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,ponds, wetlands)?If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or river it flows into. Clarification:There are no surface waters, or surface waters of the state,on or in the vicinity of the site. Surface Waters of the State includes lakes, rivers, ponds,streams, inland waters, saltwaters,wetlands and all other surface waters and water courses within the jurisdiction of the state of Washington per the Department of Ecology's"Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters of the State of Washington"Chapter 173-201A WAC. b)Ground Water: 2. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any(for example:Domestic sewage;industrial, containing the following chemicals. . .;agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served(if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. Clarification:The project no longer intends to include an employee kitchen. No agricultural waste materials are expected to enter the ground from the septic tanks or other sources due to the nature of the cultivation process implementing an evaporative watering process.There is no processing of cannabis being proposed on site, only production.See attached letter from Septic Designer Suzanne Martin labeled, "Septic Analysis"for further verification of these statements. c) Water runoff(including Storm water): 1)Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Page 12 DREAM CITY, LLC / Response to SEPA Application Comment Period Will this water flow into other waters?If so, describe. 3. Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site?If so, describe. Clarification: With the proposed Stormwater infiltration goals being 100%of on-site infiltration there is no expected impact to the vicinity of the site. Emergency overflows would only produce conditions less than or equal to the flow volumes present on the existing site prior to any disturbance. 4.Plants d)Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Clarification: Extensive landscape screening per the Jefferson County Code will be implemented along the North,West,and South property lines to further enhance the existing vegetation.The East property line borders a Light Industrial zone.This screening is to be 8'-0"tall and 10'-0" deep at the South property line, 15'-0" deep at the West property line, and 15'-0" at the North property line.See clarification for Section B.10.c.for a description of the screening. e)List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site: Clarification:Scotch Broom has been found to be present near the site. If it is found on the site it will be removed at or below ground level when in bloom whenever possible. 5.Animals a)List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: Clarification:The following animals have been sighted or are known to be on or near the site: Sparrows,Wrens,Thrushes, Coyote, Deer, Racoons, Rabbits,Shrews, Moles, Mice,Squirrels 7. Environmental Health a)Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion,spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 5)Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Clarification: Per Marijuana licensing rules(WAC 314-55) marijuana wastes from growing operations are required to be rendered unusable by mixing with 50%of other materials and ground before disposal or composting.This project will be utilizing the offsite disposal options for all solid waste from the growing operation. b)Noise Page 13 DREAM CITY, LLC / Response to SEPA Application Comment Period 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis(for example:traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 3)Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Clarification:Typical construction noise will be present while the project is being constructed. Courtesy measures will be taken to minimize the effect this noise will have on the immediate vicinity including the erection of an 8'-0"tall solid fence at the perimeter of the property.The typical operating noises will be minimal and will follow all local ordinances.There are no plans to operate large machinery or heavy equipment during the operation of the proposed facility. Traffic relating to employee's transportation,deliveries and common operations will be typical with all idling/loading/unloading to occur on the premise of the property behind the 8'-0"tall solid perimeter fence.Typical business hours will be from 8am to 5pm.A 25KW diesel engine producing 74dB at a distance of 23ft will also be on site for emergency uses only. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a) What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties?If so, describe. Clarification:The property to the South is zoned Light Industrial/Commercial,the property to the East is zoned Light Industrial, the properties to the North and West are zoned Rural Residential 1:5 (1 unit per 5 acres).The Jefferson County Code has measures in place to mitigate the potential impact of dissimilar land uses including vegetative screening requirements.The proposal will meet or exceed all required regulations of the JCC. See clarification for Section B.10.c. for a description of the screening. i)Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Clarification:The projects infrastructure(ie. septic system, parking spaces,egress and life safety design criteria) has been designed to accommodate a maximum of 14 occupants.The facility has been designed to accommodate a shift size of 4 employees during normal business activities. j)Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Clarification: None.There are no current occupants present at the site. 10.Aesthetics a) What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? Clarification:The existing shop structure is over 24'-0"tall, the peak of the tallest proposed structure will be less than 25'-0".This structure will be over 20'-0"away from the public street front and over 54'-0" from the nearest Rural Residential Zoned property.The principle exterior building material is to be metal siding. Page 1 4 DREAM CITY, LLC / Response to SEPA Application Comment Period c)Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Clarification:The project includes the incorporation of a solid corrugated metal 8'-0"tall perimeter fence which will be largely obscured by the existing and proposed landscaping(no barbed wire etc. on top of fence). Per the Jefferson County Code, section 18.30.130 Landscaping/Screening,the project will incorporate the following measures to reduce the aesthetic impact of the proposal on adjacent land uses: o North and West Property Lines: "Screen-A" landscaping: • (i) Is a "full screen"that functions as a visual barrier.This landscaping is typically found between residential and nonresidential areas; • (ii)Shall at a minimum consist of:A mix of primarily evergreen trees and shrubs generally interspersed to form a continuous year-round screen that grows to at least eight feet in height within two growing seasons. o South Property Line: "Screen-B" landscaping: • (i) Is a "filtered screen"that functions as a visual separator.This landscaping is typically found between commercial and industrial uses; between differing types of residential development; and to screen industrial uses from the road; • (ii)Shall at a minimum consist of: A mix of evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs generally interspersed to create a filtered screen that grows to at least eight feet in height within two growing seasons. 11.Light and glare a) What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Clarification: Exterior lighting will be below the Jefferson County Code thresholds, meeting all regulations and ordinances.Security lighting will be focused on the interior of the property with proper shielding to eliminate transfer of light pollution to adjacent properties.Security will be handled through infrared cameras that don't require lighting to operate. 12. Recreation a) What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Clarification:The Larry Scott Trail is approximately 600 feet to the North of the site. 14. Transportation a)Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Clarification: Louisa Street,South of W. Fredericks Street, has a paved surface. Please disregard the following text included in the application:South of Fredericks, Page 5 DREAM CITY, LLC / Response to SEPA Application Comment Period b)Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit?If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Clarification:The nearest Jefferson County Transit stop is approximately 600'from the site. d) Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads,streets,pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways?If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Clarification: Dale Severson, P.E.with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has provided the following comment per the proposed developments: "WSDOT has no concerns with this proposed development titled "Dream City LLC". The facility will be a low traffic generator, and SR 20 at this location has mainline left turn channelization with illumination. Therefore,we have no concerns with this proposed development." f)How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks(such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? Clarification:6-10 vehicle trips, based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers vehicular trip end definition, is accurate for this facility which has been designed to accommodate a shift size of 4 employees during normal business activities. With this being a newly permitted business by the state of Washington the peak volumes are not yet known. It is thought that on average the commercial and non-passenger vehicles would be no more than 20%of the overall site traffic. h)Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Clarification:The entry to the site is at the SW corner of the property away from the most common traffic route,along Louisa Street to the South of W. Fredericks. This will allow site traffic to safely enter and exit the property prior to entering the traffic merging onto W. Fredericks Street from Louisa Street.Also,the property has accommodated the necessary loading/unloading processes onsite so as to minimize the impact on W. Fredericks Street. Page 16 DREAM CITY, LLC / Response to SEPA Application Comment Period Randy Marx do Jefferson County Public Health 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Re: 192 West Fredericks Street; SEP02-00111 Dear Randy: This letter is to establish that the above mentioned system will be adequate for the proposed use. This site is zoned light industrial. The proposal includes: greenhouse and plant processing. The processing and growing portion of the proposal will not contribute wastewater. The wastewater source is the employees. The water from the plants: The system will be similar to house plants, in trays, but they will be on a drip irrigation system. Drip system is efficient; the trays will have very limited use. The water will not contribute to the wastewater flows; it will be utilized through transpiration and evaporation. Processing refers to: trimming, drying, curing and packaging of the plants for distribution. No additional processing will be conducted at this facility. The waste will be disposed of in a manner consistent with Washington State regulations and code. Using the EPA Manual Table 3-4, Typical Wastewater flow rates from commercial sources, utilizing the 'Industrial Building' 7-16 gallon per employee per day, averaging 11.5 gallons/employee/shift. There will be one shift per day allowing for 14 employees per day. 11.5 gallons x 14 employees=161 gallons per day (98- 224gal); 161 x 1.5 = 241.5 gallons per day, this is just slightly above the 240 gallons per day, the 1.5X the proposed use allows for this minimal possibility of waste above design flow. Utilizing the maximum 16 gallons per day flow; 16 gallons per day per employee = 224 gallons per day is below the peak flow allowed, 240 gallons per day. Using low flow fixtures will help limit the amount of wastewater. This system is design for 240 gallons per day. This site is on public water, the water records will not give an accurate accounting of the wastewater flow due to the water use in the greenhouse. The system is a pressure distribution system and the dosing can be monitored for compliance. It is recommended that the system control panel be set for 180 (or 160, whichever the county prefers) gallons per day with an override set for 240 gallons per day so that the number of veto doses can be easily counted. Currently there is a plumbed garage contributing wastewater to the drainfield and a shed. There is a proposed structure for the project that will be located to the East of the primary and reserve drainfield areas. This structure may have a future bathroom for employee use. The structure is lower in elevation than the existing septic& pump tanks, a permit will be applied for when the bathroom construction is proposed. The proposed use, as presented by the applicant, the wastewater should not exceed typical household strength waste. The wastewater should be tested annually for: Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD); Fats, Oils & Greases (FOG); Total Suspended Solids (TSS). The typical household strength waste does not exceed: BOD <1=125 mg/I; TSS</=80 mg/I; FOG</= 20 mg/I. It is recommended that the daily wastewater does not exceed 180 gallons per day (75% of peak capacity of 240gpd). Water use records should be evaluated annually. In conclusion, I believe that with the proposed use this system will be able to function properly and the waste strength and water use will be in compliance with regulations and policies. Sincerely, Suzanne Martin OSS Designer License#5100342 PO Box 125 Chimacum, WA 98325 (360) 990-3304 septicbysuzanne(a gmail.com .- v 1LE0 l 1� P� 14: 3 2 Z61yp°d coug't 3 )EFf RSQN coUtij Y c1 ERW 4 5 6 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON 7 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON 8 DREAM CITY LLC, a Washington limited 9 liability company,and MARVIN GARDEN TRUST,John C.Nesset, Trustee, NO. 14-2-00219-9 10 Plaintiffs, STIPULATED JUDGMENT 11 QUIETING TITLE TO REAL vs. PROPERTY 12 JEFFERSON COUNTY, a municipal 13 corporation, 14 Defendant. 15 REAL PROPERTY JUDGMENT SUMMARY 16 Assessor's Tax Parcel Numbers: 948 601 301 and 948 601 201 Legal Description of Property Awarded: Portion of the Right-of-Way for Louisa Street, in 17 the Eisenbeis Bay View Addition, records of Jefferson County 18 Money Judgment: None 19 JUDGMENT 20 This matter having come on in open Court this date, upon the Stipulation among the 21 parties; and the Court having been fully advised; it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the plaintiff Dream City LLC, a 22 Washington limited liability company,is hereby vested with title superior to that of the County in 23 and to the following portion of Louisa Street in the Eisenbeis Bay View Addition Plat, located in PEGGY ANN BIERBAUM,PS STIPULATED JUDGMENT QUIETING Attorney at Law TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY 4 4 . 00405 7800 B Polk Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 Page 1 of3 (360)379-9115 1 Jefferson County, State of Washington, which portion is hereby confirmed to have been 2 statutorily vacated by operation of law and which is legally described as follows: The West half of Louisa Street lying adjacent to Lots 6 and 7, Block 13 in 3 Eisenbeis Bay View Addition to Port Townsend, as per plat recorded in Volume 2 4 of Plats,page 54,records of Jefferson County 5 and that the County and the public generally do not claim and do not have any easements, licenses, right of entry or any other legal or equitable interests whatsoever over the property 6 described above;and it is further 7 ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREE, that plaintiff, Marvin Garden Trust is hereby 8 vested with title superior to that of the County, in and to the following portion of Louisa Street in the Eisenbeis Bay View Addition Plat, located in Jefferson County, State of Washington, which 9 portion is hereby confirmed to have been statutorily vacated by operation of law and which is 10 legally described as follows: 11 The East half of Louisa Street lying adjacent to Lots 1 and 12, Block 12 in Eisenbeis Bay View Addition to Port Townsend, as per plat recorded in Volume 2 12 of Plats,page 54,records of Jefferson County 13 and that the County and the public generally do not claim and do not have any easements, 14 licenses, right of entry or any other legal or equitable interests whatsoever over the property described above; and it is further 15 ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Jefferson County has no claim or right 16 to the right-of-way described above because such claim and rights have been statutorily vacated 17 by entry of this Order. ORDERED, AJUDGED AND DECREED, that neither party is awarded costs in this 18 action. 19 DONE IN OPEN COURT this ( clay of November,2014. 20 21 STEPHENUtPHpW. GILLARD 22 JUDGIRBURTDCOMM SSIIONER 23 PEGGY ANN BIERBAUM,PS STIPULATED JUDGMENT QUIETING Attorney at Law TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY 800 a Pak street Port Townsend,WA 98368 Page 2 of 3 (360)379-9115 I Presented by: 2 PEGGY ANN BIERBAUM, P.S. 3 Peggy • of verbaum SBA#21398 5 Attorney for Plaintiffs 6 Approved for Entry;Notice of Presentation Waived; Copy Received 7 JEFFERSON COUNTY PROSECUTOR 8 9 ,�,�- J� By: Qt. r 10 David Alvarez, WSBA#29194, OW Civil DPA Attorney for Defendant,Jefferson County 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 PEGGY ANN BIERBAUNI,PS STIPULATED JUDGMENT QUIETING Attorney at Law 800 B Polk Street TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY Port Townsend,WA 98368 Page 3 of3 (360)379-9116 DREAM CITY, LLC 192 West Fredericks St. Port Townsend,WA 98368 WA Marijuana License#:415970 UBI#: 6033338510010001 January 16, 2015 Washington State Liquor Control Board Marijuana Unit Attention:Shannon Angell To Whom It May Concern: Dream City LLC is working closely with the Department of Community Development of Jefferson County to ensure that we meet or exceed all code requirements presented by Jefferson County, Olympic Region Clean Air Agency, and the Washington State Liquor Control Board. The zoning ordinances within the Jefferson County Code are in place to ensure that the character of the neighborhood is not negatively impacted.The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan is a key tool in this endeavor and dictates the land use applied to different parcels including the land use of the project site and the adjacent parcels. When varying land uses abut there are significant ordinances in place to minimize any possible impact.The zoning ordinances strictly regulate the use of exterior lighting,the County's Public Works Department closely reviews the projects impact relating to traffic, and the Olympic Region Clean Air Agency enforces strict odor and dust policies.As an example of Dream City, LLC's commitment to being good neighbors the project will be enhancing the existing vegetation at the perimeter of the property to create as much as a fifteen foot buffer forming a continuous screen at a minimum of eight feet in height.The proposed fence per the Washington State Liquor Control Board will be located behind the extensive landscape buffer,consisting of a solid metal panel.We have enlisted a civil engineer to prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and have submitted a Stormwater Site Plan to meet the standards put forth within the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. We have worked with the County's Fire Consultant and have implemented many of their recommendations for the proposed project in addition to having met all requirements of the International Fire Code.The project has excellent proximity to an existing fire hydrant and has included two points of access for a fire engine. We appreciate the concerns of nearby residents, it is our every intention to be good neighbors. Thank you, Dream City LLC Joel Peterson From: Joel Peterson Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 4:59 PM To: Simon Little (simon@studio-stl.com) Subject: Results of Public Comments& Request for Additional Information Attachments: Public Comments.pdf Simon: I read through each of the public comment letters and am forwarding a scan of them for you to read. Some of the issues will need a response from your team so we can continue with the evaluation and to develop a fully mitigated project. I put the agency comment letters in the front of the stack, but there are good points in each of them. I wasn't able to effectively use comments that said something like "the project will impact our neighborhood", without the commenter stating what the specific impacts are. However, the comment letters identify areas that could use more complete information. Some that I'd specifically like more information about: • See Dept.of Ecology comments regarding Construction Stormwater Permit, Solid Waste Handling permit • See letter from Jared Keefer regarding some additional permit requirements. • Air—no mention of ORCAA air permit. What kind of ventilation filters/scrubbers are being installed? • Explain the shifts of the 14 employees in regard to trips-per-day. Lot of confusion about this. Provide your documented trip generation estimate. • Question about septic capacity, see comments from Environmental Health Dept. regarding permitting for a kitchen. Possibly need to coordinate with EH. • More information in#7 Environmental health hazards from operation, chemicals used, disposition of wastes • #7.b. noise: backup generators? Lights emit noise? Et cetera. • Describe the aesthetics of the fence to me: is it strung barbed wire angled at the top of the fence; is it razor slinky wire like a prison perimeter? • Discuss more about lighting plans, light&glare, keeping light on property, shielding lights, security lighting reqirements • Transportation: issues are identified in the comment letters including need for road improvements, sinage improvements ('Children at Play'), adequate and accurate description of the road network and neighboring community, walking hazards, increased traffic. There appear to be existing problems where people see the project as just making worse. Please provide additional project information about trip generation, any mitigating actions, etc. See Public Works comment letter: there's a finding that the project will not impact the County road system. The 15-foot Type A Screening is going to be critically important to buffer from the residences. I encourage you to leave as much screening vegetation as you can, even in the screening along Fredericks Street, although the screen requirement is only 10 feet deep. After I receive additional information, the next step will be to write a SEPA report(DNS, MDNS,et cetera). Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 1 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson(a?co.iefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 2 RAE STAT£0� o � Wy�2` a9ie en 00 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY PO Box 47775 •Olympia, Washington 98504-7775 •(360)407-6300 711 for Washington Relay Service •Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341 January 7,2015 Joel Peterson,Project Planner Your address Jefferson County is in the Community Development Department — Quilcene- 621 Sheridan Street Snow Port Townsend, WA 98368 '� --- watershed Dear Mr. Peterson: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the optional determination of nonsignificance/notice of application for the Dream City, LLC-Redevelopment Project(MLA14- 00090) located at 192 West Fredericks Street in Port Townsend as proposed by Marc Hilt, Dream City,LLC. The Department of Ecology(Ecology)reviewed the environmental checklist and has the following comment(s): WASTE 2 RESOURCES: Julie Robertson (360) 407-6471 If greater than 250 cubic yards of inert, demolition, and/or wood waste is used as fill material, a Solid Waste Handling permit may be required(WAC 173-350-990). Check with the Jefferson County Health Department for any permitting requirements that may be required. Marijuana licensing rules (WAC 314-55)require that marijuana wastes from growing and processing operations be rendered unusable by mixing with 50 percent other materials and ground before disposal or composting. Solid waste management is regulated at the local level by county health departments. Ecology recommends the proponent of this proposal contact Christy Fiedler with the Jefferson County Health Department at(360)344-9303 to determine what amount of solid waste oversight might be needed, if any. REVIEWER: Sonia Mendoza WATER QUALITY CONTACT: Deborah Cornett(360)407-7269 The following construction activities require coverage under the Construction Stormwater General Permit: January 7, 2015 Page 2 1. Clearing, grading and/or excavation that results in the disturbance of one or more acres and discharges stormwater to surface waters of the State; and 2. Clearing, grading and/or excavation on sites smaller than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of development or sale, if the common plan of development or sale will ultimately disturb one acre or more and discharge stormwater to surface waters of the State. a) This includes forest practices(including, but not limited to, class IV conversions) that are part of a construction activity that will result in the disturbance of one or more acres, and discharge to surface waters of the State; and 3. Any size construction activity discharging stormwater to waters of the State that Ecology: a) Determines to be a significant contributor of pollutants to waters of the State of Washington. b) Reasonably expects to cause a violation of any water quality standard. If there are known soil/ground water contaminants present on-site, additional information (including,but not limited to:temporary erosion and sediment control plans; stormwater pollution prevention plan; list of known contaminants with concentrations and depths found; a site map depicting the sample location(s);and additional studies/reports regarding contaminant(s))will be required to be submitted. You may apply online or obtain an application from Ecology's website at: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/stormwater/construction/-Application. Construction site operators must apply for a permit at least 60 days prior to discharging stormwater from construction activities and must submit it on or before the date of the first public notice. Ecology's comments are based upon information provided by the lead agency. As such,they may not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations that must be obtained or legal requirements that must be fulfilled in order to carry out the proposed action. If you have any questions or would like to respond to these comments,please contact the appropriate reviewing staff listed above. Department of Ecology Southwest Regional Office (SM:14-6464) cc: Deborah Cornett, WQ Julie Robertson W2R Joyce Smith,HQ/WQ Marc Hilt, Dream City, LLC(Applicant) Joel Peterson From: Mendoza, Sonia (ECY) <Smen461©ECY.WA.GOV> Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 4:04 PM To: Joel Peterson Cc: Robertson, Julie (ECY); Cornett, Deborah (ECY); Smith, Joyce M. (ECY) Subject: ECY SEPA 14-6464- Dream City, LLC-Redevelopment Project-Comments Attachments: 14-6464.pdf Importance: High Categories: Public Comment Mr. Peterson, Attached are Ecology's comments for the Dream City, LLC-Redevelopment Project (Ecology SEPA No. 14-6464). This is the original final copy. Comments are due today 1/7/15. 03enia c ((endaza Department of Ecology-SWRO SEPA Coordinator P:360-407-6313 I F:360-407-6305 sonia.mendoza@ecy.wa.gov Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 1 Joel Peterson From: Severson, Dale <SeversD@wsdot.wa.gov> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 8:31 AM To: Joel Peterson Cc: Johnson, Debbie; OR-SEPA-Review; Sawyer, Jeff Subject: SR 20- Request for SEPA review--Jefferson County, Dream City Project Attachments: Public Notice.pdf; SEPA Environmental Checklist.pdf; MLA14-00090 Dream City.pdf Good morning Joel, Per the email and attachments sent to us, WSDOT has no concerns with this proposed development titled "Dream City LLC". The facility will be a low traffic generator, and SR 20 at this location has mainline left turn channelization with illumination. Therefore, we have no concerns with this proposed development. If you have any questions please contact me. Thanks Dale C. Severson, P.E. Development Services Engineer - WSDOT Olympic Region (360) 357-2736 I dale.severson@wsdot.wa.gov 1 ''•5 !• dig ,! J I I 1 I IIII I I F-- .. .. ,I I 1 ' I 1 I 1 III ill 1 I I IU !I, 1 11 , i 1 , III Ii / ---_ , , i I , , , , , cll. 1 , ,, , I , 1 , 11 I i,„ 1 I1 1 '-- 1 i . r- , i i r---- .... i I ...., i i I ct,- 192 W Fredricks St 1 , I i , , / i ........a, , do ir , „ & .. . ..7. ,,ii• 1 i • '',....4/ II I P41' II 1 1 '.°:i ,• 1 , !, -,'''' '7 '4rn ' ,, a : i 11 i ''1” 1 ' •-c:Lff. , •:- ..-, _ , i , ,,,-..6kito-:•-•,• _ ... tt • ,i' ; I ' 1 .4-_,6. .,...- - -- ',..1 .,. .,„•:• i •- •*r.g 1 ..... .• - : I 4. . 4 1-.. 4' - II 7j7i.'-14i._, ,g;:75Y!. 1 I , ',40. ' I I 1 " ' I ir 1 . 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I . ', ...- -...• . , . . . S;, _ an dsrton e L n , ''.=;.• .'iIlli '.Z.4ofp Nr: '''. 1 ,T. .„. . . ,. 4.r,,T I . ;,,,,,,,... • CT 0- i . — CID I I . IT M414 •- ill '-i• -- i . , •i II 1 I . ___ — " ------- ., .. i . ., , - I1 . r.., if . . . . L. i ..i.if •, ,-I Ilk , 11 ''4, 2.‘• ifi,rt,•; ,_,,- , .,.i.- '•-• - ' ••••''',;- ,- i .7. , ' • From: Sawyer, Jeff Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 4:40 PM 2 _ tom SIG _-- t ~ t� r tX j i -rl. ' _____1_1______8:________1, _ I III 11, . i_ It'll • St s 4 :if' -r-i J /u , ,p }I, '40--- . , ' ' '• N ilt.,,,„ . , _____.---/ _ . J , 1 _ ---] __ 1 „ ____ .. . . ______ 0 Srl x .tea. n a _ f • 4 .Y'. -_..I_.. __ R, u Iaam l _�— .'"rte-..*' a. T s y�. f, s 1 _ .,s=ue- ,D D '- rt.,.---; 4 c1 To: Severson, Dale Subject: Request for SEPA review--Jefferson County, Dream City Project Fyi and action. From: Joel Peterson [maiito:JPetersoraco.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 3:22 PM To: Sawyer, Jeff Subject: Request for SEPA review--Jefferson County, Dream City Project Attn: Environmental Office I am a Jefferson County planner working on a development project proposal near State Route 20. I've attached a SEPA Checklist for your review. I see that I didn't originally send the SEPA Checklist to WSDOT. The comment period for this project has closed, but comments I've received have highlighted intersection delays and left-turn trouble at State Route 20 and West Fredericks Street. I'm asking for any comments you may have from your review. The project is on the west side of the Glen Cove Industrial District—West Fredericks Street and State Route 20. Our Public Works Department commented that the project will not impact the County Road System. The proposal estimates an additional 10 trips per day generated by shift-work of 14 employees total. The attachment MLA14-00090 contains all the review documents. For clarity, I attached the SEPA Checklist and Public Notice in separate files. Thanks. Please let me know if you have any questions. Joel Agency Reviewer: Attached is a Public Notice of Application for a marijuana production facility in the Light Industrial zoning district of Jefferson County. The project will have an initial site preparation phase and construction of one building. Phase two implements more construction of greenhouse facilities. An engineered stormwater plan is under review. A SEPA Environmental Checklist is attached. Full documentation can be retrieved from the web at this location: http://test.co.jefferson.wa.us/WeblinkExterna I/DocView.aspx?id=1260656&dbid=0 Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson{aco.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. 3 Jefferson County Department of Public Works „ t 623 Sheridan St. <uJ, Port Townsend, WA 98368 • (360) 385-9160 Monte Reinders, P.E. Public Works Director/County Engineer MEMORANDUM Date: 1/5/2015 To: Joel Peterson,DCD From: Eric Kuzma,JCPW Project: Dream City LLC: (MLA 14-00090/ZON 14-00045—PW 94014090) Subject: JCPW SEPA Review&Comments STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT REVIEW After review of the environmental checklist for the referenced proposal,the Jefferson County Department of Public Works has the following comments: Environmental Checklist Section 1-Earth& Section 3-Water The Jefferson County Unified Development Code,Sections 18.30.060,Grading and excavation standards and 18.30.070,Stormwater Management Standards set standards for erosion and sedimentation control and Stormwater management. The code adopts the requirements set forth by the most current version(2012)of the Washington Department of Ecology(DOE)Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW). The square footage of proposed impervious surface is such that the proponent is required to develop and implement a SWMMWW compliant Stormwater Site Plan,minimum requirements#1 through#9. To fulfill this requirement,the proponent has submitted a Jefferson County Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Template which includes a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan(template)(stamped 10/29/14),a customized Impervious Surface Calculation worksheet(stamped 10/29/14),and Site Plan drawings(stamped 10/29/14& 12/11/14)including a TESC plan(stamped 10/29/14). Public Works will conduct a detailed review of the proposed Stormwater Site Plan,including the above referenced items,and provide appropriate comments as part of the Stormwater review. The project includes clearing,grading and/or excavation that results in the disturbance of more than one acre. Per the application it appears as though discharge of stormwater to surface waters of the State(as defined by DOE)may occur. If so,proponent should verify with DOE as to whether they are required to apply for a NPDES Construction Stormwater General Permit(CGP). Public Works Department Recommendation: Based upon the requirement to develop and implement an approved Stormwater Site Plan,Public Works recommends finding that the proposal is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts related to erosion,sedimentation and stormwater runoff. Environmental Checklist Section 14-Transportation. Access to the site is via an existing approach off of a section of Fredericks Street not maintained by Jefferson County.Per the application,this project will generate an average of 6 to 10 new trips per day. Public Works Department Recommendation: Public Works recommends finding that the proposal is not likely to result in significant adverse impacts to the County Road system. Joel Peterson From: Eric Kuzma Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2015 8:50 AM To: Joel Peterson Subject: SEPA Review Comments MLA 14-00090 Attachments: SEPA Review.pdf SEPA Review Comments for MLA 14-00090 Dream City, LLC 192 W. Fredericks Street. (Note: SEPA only, Stormwater review is separate) Please see attached. Thanks, Eric Eric Kuzma,Architect/Engineer III Jefferson County Department of Public Works 623 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 Ph:360.385.9167 - 360.301.6783(c) Fax:360.385.9234 Email:ekuzmana co jecferson.wa.us Web: www.cojefferson.wa.us/publicworks 1 Joel Peterson From: Susan Porto Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 3:50 PM To: Joel Peterson Subject: Notice of Application and Agency Review Request--Dream City LLC marijuana production facility Categories: Public Comment Joel, The following are general comments related to your notice of application: • The cut and fill areas described must not be in the area of any portion of the septic system or reserve drainfield area as permitted under SEP02-00111. • The storm water systems proposed on the site must meet the required 30' downslope setback from the septic drainfield and reserve drainfield area. • The application indicates no groundwater will be used for irrigation of the crop and no well will be drilled on the property. Only city water will be used. • The project describes "an employee kitchen". I can't figure out where the kitchen facility will be, as the existing structures on the property were permitted for a bathroom only and the three pending permits do not address the addition of a kitchen. This will need to be clarified prior to permit approval. • From review of the septic system file on the parcel it appears that there is a garage on the site that has been used as a residence. That building was permitted (bld03-28) with a bathroom only addition to a work shop and was not intended for residential use. Clarification will be necessary as a part of the permit review and approval. If there is residential use of the garage/work shop planned,expansion of the septic system may be necessary to allow for the 14 employees proposed. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Susan Susaw Porto R.S. Jef fevsow Oouwttj Public hteaLth Pliowe 360. 385.:9404 Fax 360. 3 .4487- ALwaWorlziAAg for .safer I-FeaLtiLer-e f fersow couwttu. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message,including any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,use,disclosure,or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT NOTICE: All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is exempt from disclosure under state law,including RCW 42.56. From:Joel Peterson Sent: Friday, December 19, 2014 5:42 PM To: 'sepacenter@dnr.wa.gov'; 'sepaunit@ecy.wa.gov'; 'sepadesk@dfw.wa.gov'; 'Gretchen.Kaehler@DAHP.wa.gov; 'jim@portofpt.com'; 'bgraham@jeffpud.org'; Eric Kuzma;Jared Keefer; Leanne Jenkins; 'crossi@pnptc.org'; 'stodd@Suquamish.nsn.us'; 'shlanayl@skokomish.org'; Pat Perryman Subject: Notice of Application and Agency Review Request--Dream City LLC marijuana production facility 1 r _ Agency Reviewer: Attached is a Public Notice of Application for a marijuana production facility in the Light Industrial zoning district of Jefferson County. The project will have an initial site preparation phase and construction of one building. Phase two implements more construction of greenhouse facilities. An engineered stormwater plan is under review. A SEPA Environmental Checklist is attached. Full documentation can be retrieved from the web at this location: http://test.co.iefferson.wa.us/WeblinkExternal/DocView.aspx?id=1260656&dbid=0 Thank you for your review. I will be out of the office until December 29, and can follow-up on any questions then. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson pco.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 2 Joel Peterson To: Simon Little (simon@studio-stl.com) Subject: FW: MLA14-00090 located at 192 W Fredericks St. Attachments: !Marijuana_AirInfoNeeded.docx Simon, I have a comment from the Olympic Region Clean Air Agency regarding the Dream City facility on Fredericks Street. They need you to check in with them and provide application materials and a completed marijuana air information sheet (see attached). Let me know if you have any questions. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 joeterson Ca7co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From:Aaron Manley [mailto:aaron.manley@orcaa.org] Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 1:59 PM To:Joel Peterson Subject: MLA14-00090 located at 192 W Fredericks St. Hello, Joel. Thank you for the notice regarding MLA14-00090 located at 192 W Fredericks St. I want to inform you and the applicant that a Notice of Construction (NOC) application and registration of the business may be required by ORCAA prior to construction of a new Marijuana(MJ) Facility depending on the site specific details. For this reason, ORCAA requests a copy of the final application submitted to the County and completion of the attached MJ air information form. Based on this information, ORCAA staff will determine if an NOC and/or registration are required and will notify the applicant and the County accordingly. ORCAA and state odor regulations apply during both the construction/installation and operation phases of MJ facilities. Therefore ORCAA recommends all MJ facilities devise and implement an appropriate odor control and contingency plan. Odors should be addressed in the Environmental Checklist and be considered by the county during facility siting. If you have any questions regarding ORCAA's comments, please feel free to give me a call. 1 v`' k-e,e,re &vv7A,46 EC? caw,,ti.,,�, ,w-161-4 -2' c_Lor g 3 542.,, 5 a Cer,vrr j A,ps /714-edIj pti,) cvrn--4-eq 5 PiI,le J Me.A Lic — 1, ter 61(1be. h ,/,,4 c � "'DC 4-17 ' ,� / , <V11 t r11� IlLer4t.e_ 4t.0+ i i C e. /I i 14 _SOPA _ CLije j•ct Al( - )4r.9>VA 0 ICL P pAzfYv49 - cp1rin 511149+, a( W 10 lM -e"yp -b5 —'fires bit^-i �', ( 1t(i ,1 q 4},41 1ft AA) el-A-ti/1( Adep-r,.n,410.1 a$ 5 S`kGW‘ (SC-, 6 o(Af 3) tron »moi k ,14), j4 -91`a)-v -prrw"? C C.-0„41-410 , 1Xe;" - ,1- ' '7 Vc''< - i 54-1V112*i / nutir`C-,e1 kkAP 1*)119^ 4.i 1.e. ,lU '7 x^111, r V�iRf�Qi t 6�tit��a/ - 5(,L1--e ril ml n vw12- ✓'c)c Lj ldd I,LGri' wed 141,,y km vj 4n4,4;L ,- C V.n*n,L( 'w,n :497-n n �..��.�' G.a,✓w�vi �J`^``►`� .l '� C(�t,rQ ,C l-lr�'i,n i Nei hbors not happy -about g • nearby marijuana business By Nicholas Johnson ''''' _ - * n a fi r The area's residents said of the Leader -i - • � - x ; they are concerned about in- .,t u- s of Maplewood � � . � 4,!.."-',,A., z' " �' i` �� creased traffic, waste prod- Residents p Y a , xC, rxy�,y,411A acts and potential odor, as Meadows are asking the Jcf „ '''.,i q l well as the business's size and ferson County commissioners s "9 A't` a ' 585-foot distance:from their to stop a proposed marijuana r -- w . ryes--^ 7. - , ^"�„��,� �, .,� ��¢A neighborhood. - - growing and processing busy i , a , 'The only access into and ness located at the only en- t ; ,-, r. :4 > ; out of our neighborhood is trance to their neighborhood c; , t1 g � � � through the intersection that -West Fredericks and Louisa c . r" s` ^ , abuts the site,"Davis said."At streets. �'" � r 4 44,000 square feet, this will "Why here, next to our r r:" �, ,� - ;,.3, amount to site coverage of over neighborhood, instead of s�. r� '''''''k'' [ , ,.pan acre;making one of the across [State] Route 20 with �, ' ; ,-r+�i . . -• t„..„y t. s” larger;if riotthelargest,grow the other similar businesses?" l ' r ri,-,.:,,,,-;.„,, facility in the area." asked Peter Davis, one of ..<` 1i Area resident Kim Gordon about 50 residents in the area. .s ���� � � �t � also spoke of the business's In the Glen Cove Business ;A: -s „ +„�1 :v i': - proposed scale. Park on the east side of State "The facility has an almost Route 20,two marijuana buss , .; ar,K max* + - x s, prison-like appearance, with nesses Jefferson Cannabis a ,rt ' its 8-foot-tall fence topped at 453 Otto St. and Outback t w, Nr � „ ,a, � ' : y�va by razor wire,” Gordon said. Bud Company at 71 Eisen- € a "' 1 ,,....40'0°' 'This, along with the high-in- beis Ave. —have been issued -' t " - " - ` °' `.v'a.'en state licenses while another Maplewood Meadows resident Angie O'Dell holds her 10-month-old tensity security lighting, will draw attention to the facility seven businesses in that gen- daughter Alexis while addressing the JeftersogCountycommissioners and may pose security risks to enol area are awaiting.state Jan.5.She and fellow neighbors expressed concern over a proposed the neighborhood." approval. marijuana growing and processing business adjacent to their Hilt has proposed asix- A countywide moratorium neighborhood along W.Fredericks Street near Port Townsend. structure facility, including on marijuana businesses cur- Photo by Nicholas Johnson two 7,000-square-foot steel rently limits growing and buildings for production,three processing activity to areas Tier 3 producer license,which ment period. Many had al- greenhouses totaling 22,638 zoned for agriculture,forest or would allow up to- 21,000 ready sent letters to DCD and square-feet for growing, a industry until county officials square-feet of plant canopy. the Washington State Liquor driveway, a 14-space parking establish new rules for such Hilt does not yet have a state Control Board(WSLCB). lot and another 2.650-square- businesses in other zones, license. Area resident Angie O'Dell foot building. such as rural residential. On Oct. 30. 2014, Hilt ap- addressed the commissioners The area's " residents Two marijuana businesses, plied for county permits to con- while holding her 10-month- said they do not oppose the yet to get state licenses, in- struct a roughly 44,000 square old daughter Alexis: state's burgeoning mari- tend to locate in the Glen Cove foot, multi-building facility on "I'think this can be placed Juana industry, yet they are Business Park on the west nearly two acres of land zoned somewhere else,"she said. "It concerned about how such a side SR 20, which is zoned ..LightIndustrial. doesn't need,to be placed di- seemingly large. industrial a mixture of light industrial The county's Department redly onto our neighborhood." business might impact their ` and commercial (industry). of Community Development Davis and others pointed neighborhood. Both are near the entrance (DCD)is accepting public corn- out that 23 children live in "We see this area as a to the Maplewood Meadows ments through 4:30 p.m.Jan. their neighborhood, across wonderful place to raise our neighborhood. 7. A public hearing is not ex- West Fredericks from the pro- families," Gordon told the Liberty Street Farm at petted and neither is an envi- posed business. That neigh- commissioners. "Please take 75 Louisa St., which is zoned ronmental impact statement, horhood features 17 homes this objection and larger issue light industrial and commer- though comments will help and 10 undeveloped lots. to heart and reconsider the i cial.is yet to be licensed by the county planners mitigate po- "In fact,the school children situation in these early stages state and has yet to apply for tential environmental issues. in our neighborhood must walk so that the right decisions are county permits. Some 10 area residents directly through the intersec- made for the best interests of Chimacum resident Marc attended the commission- tion abutting the proposed all the individuals involved, Hilt's Dream City LLC at 192 ers' regular meeting Monday site,"Davis said."In our opin- not just the applicants." W. Fredericks St. has applied morning, Jan. 5, and four ion, this is a serious oversight (See an extended story i for a processor license and a spoke during the public corn- on the part of the WSLCB." at ptieader.com) 1 J Joel Peterson From: Joel Peterson Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 10:54 AM To: 'Adam Kelly' Cc: Mary Blain Subject: RE: Dream City Temporary Permit Expiration Adam, The building permit BLD14-00462 for the greenhouses was issued a Temporary Occupancy(T.O.) permit which expires October 2"d, 2015. The T.O.was issued for the greenhouses so that the Liquor and Cannabis Board could complete their inspection and to move plant material onto the premises. The October 2"d date was the agreed-upon date for when the landscaping installation would be inspected,so that was the expiration date for the T.O. Since your schedule for completing the final permit approval is not going to meet the October 2nd deadline of the current T.O., please provide us with a new proposal for what calendar date you will complete the permit requirements, and we will issue another T.O. before the current one expires. Thanks. Joel Joel Peterson,Associate Planner 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 379-4457 From:Adam Kelly [mailto:flowerfarmer926@gmail.com] Sent:Thursday,September 17, 2015 3:31 PM To:Joel Peterson<JPeterson@co.jefferson.wa.us>; Mary Blain<mblain@co.jefferson.wa.us> Subject: dream city progress Hello Joel and Mary. My name is Adam Kelly. I spoke with both of you on the phone recently. Im the new Director of Operations at Dream City on Fredericks St. Id like to make you aware of the progress that has been made on our construction and appeal to you for a realistic schedule of completion based on new circumstances. Ill be as brief as possible. Thanks for your time. As you are probably aware, this project has been a nine headed monster. Original team members have left us and we are doing our absolute best to respect the relationship with you folks while trying to get our projects completed. The landscape is less of a concern to me than the buildings. I am in the process of getting plants ordered. These things usually take a matter of days to be shipped in and i believe that the amount of work that needs to be done outside can be done in about one week. Im having trouble locating some of the bigger items 1 because of the time of year. They generally wont dig B&B evergreens in fall but rather in spring. Im trying to find a way around that. Most of the plants have been found and secured. If possible, i am requesting an additional week or so on the landscape. I dont want to drag this thing out but its a matter of physically obtaining the plants previously approved in our plan. Buildings A and B... this is a different story. I apologize if some of this information is redundant, i came in late in the game. Building A: So we have (finally) figured out our issues with the security wires and cameras. We have passed inspection with Mike Anderson and we are poised to switch out camera wires any day now, as soon as the wire arrives. We had a major issue with the drywaller. His estimate came in at $7k, he did half of the work(and poorly), asked for $7k more, we gave it to him, he then asked for$35k more than that to complete the work, at which time we had to let him go. This has created major setbacks in finishing drywall,running remaining wires,painting, getting infrastructure installed(fans and lights,plumbing etc) and has prevented the electrician from getting into the building to do his work. We have since found another drywaller and painter. The drywall was just finished in east building A,painting will be finished tomorrow. West building A drywall starts monday, will be five days of work and painting thereafter. We can then finish trimming out and do the electrical work. Building B still needs to be designed, then electrical needs are communicated to the contractor, they install, L&I inspects,you inspect framing,we drywall, you inspect again? Then the rest of it gets buttoned up. Is this fairly on target? This amount of work will take months and i just want to make sure im not over staying my welcome with you folks. Please let me know if i am still in line or if additional conversations,permits, or details need to take place. My understanding is that the BUILDING related CO's are NOT in fact due Oct 2nd but rather March of 2016 . Please confirm this. Thanks so much for your time and understanding in this matter. I got thrown into it late and im doing my best to pick up the pieces and get back on track. I hope to speak with you soon and get this out of the way. Adam 2 - 1 ' 15 Joel Peterson Cada 5ii Ly C. p+ c.- cJ`(ir)10 From: Linda Atkins t C ,C �' • �s rv�i 4� "o eaz/lLwv' S Tont T elsdaPersone 30, 2015 8:56 AM h��{ ne et e3+fx�l Gu` 5(,)rk s ler Subject: RE: Question Re: Susan's SEP14-143 Permit, and BLD14-462 -- Dream City, LLC Ct tsf tit“f. Joel. Susan signed off the Septic Finaled activity already because it does not involve septic review since no plumbing. No reason for us to give any approval for temporary occupancy. Linda Atkins R.S. Environmental Health Specialist, JCPH Environmental Health Division 360-385-9444 Always working for a safer and healthier Jefferson County GPlh1DE17YALirr This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use; disclosure, or distrihution is prohibited If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a saute law found at RCM 42..dh'. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from disclosure under state law, including RCW'42.56 From:Joel Peterson Sent: Monday,June 29, 2015 3:15 PM To: Linda Atkins Subject: Question Re:Susan's SEP14-143 Permit, and BLD14-462 -- Dream City, LLC Linda, Dream City requests Temporary Occupancy permits for their greenhouses under BLD14-462. There is no septic use by the greenhouses,the septic review activities appear to have been signed off. Will you give a short reply if there is/is not any concern by EH to give Dream City a Temporary Occupancy permit for the greenhouses? (It's temporary because they want to defer the landscaping requirements to early fall.) [Note:The site development includes two other building permits: BLD14-00460 and BLD14-00461,that uses the septic system, and so we would require the septic to be completed for those occupancy permits. Looks like the pressure test is the last septic activity to sign off.] Thanks. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner, Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson(eco.iefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW 1 Joel Peterson From: Sally Ellis Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 8:21 AM To: Joel Peterson Cc: Randy Marx; Evan Dobrowski Subject: bId14-00462 -SEP14-00143 ,Joel- Look at the conditions on Building permit,BLD14-00462 - I am pretty sure-this condition was already meet- but need to double check with you- (ZON14-00045) The applicant shall meet all conditions associated with the Land Use and Stormwater Permit ZON14-00045 which are attached to this building permit, along with all conditions directly entered into this building permit. Envirnomental Health- Please look at SEP14-00143 and please tell me what is left-so I can call Dream City and tell them what they need to do. Thank you ' ' C' ‘/?� � GNI 5-1-61pZ,e4 Ecn X7/(2 ) 4 5" 0,1),,0.64 aft , -ii,,,,,'‘‘‘ i,r +, ` _. 1C/1 8,t4l,'tn5 5 - , Aoler;r'1 Sally L Ellis Jefferson County Community Development Permit Technician G',,,,'-ill tipt,uc, CL,rye frit_ {7 ���� I 621 Sheridan St., Port Townsend,WA 98368 _/ Mon-Thurs 9am-4:30pm, closed from 12-1 j"4-1 4 c >"" -tr Ph: 360-379-4452 Fax: 360-379-4451 — L sellisPco.iefferson.wa.us ` 5 c�A75 +...9PAcJeU�/ http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us �'i1 !'k . ?�fl1'-+ -4 n 1- v14 --4, FI-h-9;W t>--c. p (e,iii, 4.9,47. (s— ri- r , Lv 5 0 iz.5544. conk oef1 p (0„1.44,i) P7ft.v\ 1 Joel Peterson From: Simon Little <simon@studio-stl.com> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 3:08 PM To: Joel Peterson Subject: Dream City follow up Joel, I spoke with Bill Staples and he agreed that he'd like to proceed with the temporary final occupancy on the greenhouses with the planting schedule you provided. They may engage that point with you down the road again but at this time they are settled with proceeding as you outlined. Thanks, Simon Little studio-stl.corn 360.640.8814 PO Box 1786 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Office Address 909 Water Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 1 Joel Peterson From: Joel Peterson Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 4:57 PM To: Simon Little (simon@studio-stl.com); 'Bill Staples' Cc: Mary Blain; Carl Smith Subject: Dream City Temporary Occupancy for Greenhouses Simon Little and Bill Stables, Regarding Temporary Occupancy of Dream City Greenhouses: All of the Temporary Occupancy approvals go through Carl Smith, Director. I've discussed your needs with Carl and we worked out a way to can issue a Temporary Occupancy approval for Dream City's Greenhouses D, E and F. It's my understanding that your concerns are with the survival of plantings during the summer, as well as wanting to move forward with state licensing approvals on the greenhouses as soon as possible. These are are the conditions of a Temporary Occupancy approval: Permit BLD14-00462 covers Greenhouses D, E and F.All the structures on the permit need to be completed. I understand that.Greenhouse F has not been constructed yet. Inspection Sign-offs for Greenhouses D, E and F need to be complete. There is a note on the permit to verify the setbacks to the 8-foot security fence as shown on the site plan (10 feet). U We need to negotiate a specific timeline for Dream City, LLC to comply with the landscape screening conditions of BLD14-00090,with the understanding that requirements will be completed in the specified timeframe. We are comfortable specifying a completion date of September 1, 2015. The landscaping requirement is applicable to each permit, so we encourage you to complete it as soon as it is manageable. I hope this approach will meet your needs. Please let me know what your construction schedule is looking like for these items and how you want to proceed. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson @co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 1 Joel Peterson From: Joel Peterson Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 10:47 AM To: Mary Blain Cc: Carl Smith Subject: RE: dream city Mary: I spoke to Carl about the Temporary Occupancy for a portion of Dream City. I will relay the conditions for a Temporary Occupancy for pre-engineered greenhouses D, E and F in BLD14-00090: • Sign-offs for the greenhouse need to be complete, which includes verification of the setbacks to the fence. • All the structures on the permit (i.e. Greenhouse F) need to be completed. • I will request a specific timeline from Dream City, LLC for complying with the landscape screening conditions on BLD14-00090, with the understanding that they will be completing it in 90 days (September). I don't have any input as far as the valuation &assessment questions go; I recommend discussing a strategy with Carl. Thanks. Joel From: Mary Blain Sent: Monday,June 01, 2015 9:38 AM To:Joel Peterson Subject: dream city Joel, So here are the concerns from BLD. Setbacks for the fence need to be checked and BLD "F" must be completed, since it's part of the permit. Something else that might be worth looking into, is that the total valuation for all three greenhouses (including materials, heat tubes,foundation, labor etc)was set at$140,000. I'm of the notion that the real valuation is quite a bit higher. They've said the total for the whole site is somewhere around $665,000, but I'd bet that it's closer to$1.2 mil. Anyways, not sure if we should address this, it would mean a letter from Carl and a budget break down and would be a bit of a hassle. Mary Blain Plans Examiner I Dept of Community Development 621 Sheridan St Port Townsend, WA 98368 ph: 360-379-4461 fax: 360-379-4451 mblain@co j efferson.wa.us All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail 1 Joel Peterson From: Mary Blain Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 11:06 AM To: Simon Little; Joel Peterson; Sally Ellis / Subject: RE: BLD14-462/ Dream City Simon, �lcq/hU'141rv\ I'm waiting on the email detailing the cost of the hydronic system to adjust the fees and a narrative describing the change in the plans,to add the heat tubes. If all of the inspections have been completed for green houses D,E and F, we can do a final inspection and issue the C&O once the fees have been paid. 106- Let me know if you have questions. �I v� �', ' iontl Mary Blain --� Plans Examiner 1 Dept of Community Development "t (�l 621 Sheridan St �� �� by ,��� Y� Port Townsend, WA 98368 tJ� ph: 360-379-4461 fax: 360-379-4451 —,. lk mblain@cojefferson.wa.us 1f 1`n Arsev- jc� 1 .th.f4s Lc ct 1'K�u9 All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson tCou tyke mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act, a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy (or for inspection) of this e-mail unless it is also exempt from production to the requester according to state law, including RCW 42.56 and other state laws. From: Simon Little imailto:simon@studio-stl.com] Sent:Tuesday, May 19, 2015 10:58 AM To:Joel Peterson; Mary Blain; Sally Ellis Subject: BLD14-462/Dream City Joel/Mary/ Sally, The Dream City owners have asked if it would be possible to receive a final certificate of occupancy on the greenhouses (BLD 14-462) in advance of the other permits. They would like to begin using the Greenhouses as soon as possible and the path to a final on that permit is shorter than the other structures due to the simplistic nature of their use and assembly. Are there any obstacles to pursuing that final in advance of the other permits tied to the project? Thanks, 1 Joel Peterson From: Eric Kuzma Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:32 AM To: Joel Peterson Subject: FW: Dream City Infiltration Trench Detail Attachments: Dream City Stormwater Infiltration Trench Detail.pdf Hi Joel, Attached is an additional piece of information I requested. -Eric Eric Kuzma,Architect/Engineer III Jefferson County Department of Public Works 623 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 Ph:360.385.9167 - 360.301.6783(c) Fax:360.385.9234 Email: ekuzm'. co jef)•erson.wa.us Web:www.co.jefferson.wa.us/publicworks From:ev_sorensen@hotmail.com [mailto:ev_sorensen@hotmail.com] On Behalf Of Everett A. Sorensen Sent:Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:23 AM To: Eric Kuzma Subject: Dream City Infiltration Trench Detail Hi Eric, I'll drop off a stamped & signed hard copy of the attached detail. Thank you, Everett Everett A. Sorensen, P.E. Streamline Environmental, Inc. 1821 Sahlman Drive, Suite B; Tampa, FL 33605 715 Grant Street; Port Townsend, WA 98368-2405 360-821-9960 1 Joel Peterson From: ev_sorensen@hotmail.com on behalf of Everett A. Sorensen <everett@streamlineenv.com> Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 4:12 PM To: Eric Kuzma; Joel Peterson Cc: Simon Little; marc@marchilt.com; Dominic Morrison; John Nisbet Subject: RE: MLA14-90 Revised Stormwater Management Plans Hi Joel, I got your phone message this afternoon. Yes, we're aware there's a proposed 15' vegetated buffer along the western boundary. I don't think this will conflict with a vegetated swale, or vegetated flow path. I just met on-site with Marc and John Nisbet, and we think we can provide both the flow path, and the vegetated screen. There's also a security fence 15 ft from the western boundary. We think there are at least two good options: 1. Keep all flow paths east of the security fence at the 15 ft mark, meaning a slight pinch point at the corner of the existing exterior covered space, and a bit more surface grading north of there to constrain the flow pathg, or 2. Provide a course drain rock-filled flow path at the intersection with the fence, allowing flow and infiltration underneath the vegetated barrier. For security reasons, there can't be air space under the fence. Thank you, Everett Everett A. Sorensen, P.E. Streamline Environmental, Inc. 1821 Sahlman Drive, Suite B; Tampa, FL 33605 715 Grant Street; Port Townsend, WA 98368-2405 360-821-9960 From: everett@streamlineenv.com To: ekuzma@co.jefferson.wa.us;jpeterson@co.jefferson.wa.us CC: ewilliams@co.jefferson.wa.us; simon@studio-stl.com; marc@marchilt.com; yellobelliedmarmot@gmail.com; odysseyofgreen@gmail.com; wlstaplesl@gmail.com Subject: MLA14-90 Revised Stormwater Management Plans Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 10:40:52 -0800 Hello Eric and Joel, This morning I submitted to both of you, stamped & signed hard copies of the attached Revised Stormwater Plans for Dream City LLC, 192 W. Fredericks. 1 Per previous discussions with Eric, the main revisions include: • Removal of proposed rain gardens along the southern boundary, • Approximate locations of 30 proposed downspouts and two Type I catch basins, • Proposed grading of driveway and parking area to direct run-off to an existing vegetated swath west of the existing building, • Modifications and expansions to the proposed below-slab infiltration beds, two of which are now proposed for both large greenhouses, and • Construction details of the proposed below-slab infiltration beds. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Everett Everett A. Sorensen, P.E. Streamline Environmental, Inc. 1821 Sahlman Drive, Suite B; Tampa, FL 33605 715 Grant Street; Port Townsend, WA 98368-2405 360-821-9960 2 Joel Peterson From: Eric Kuzma Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 2:06 PM To: Joel Peterson Hi Joel, I called and left a message for Everett Sorenson to call me back regarding the Dream City Phase 2 Stormwater Permit. I will be running to the site today to check out their silt fence. -Eric Eric Kuzma,Architect/Engineer III Jefferson County Department of Public Works 623 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 Ph:360.385.9167 - 360.301.6783(c) Fax:360.385.9234 Email: ekuzma@cojefferson.wa.us Web: www.cojecferson.wa.us/publicworks 1 , ,ON �Or JEFFERSON COUNTY i DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 Web:www.co.Jefferson.wauslcommunitvdevelopment `rgrlr hC�ot Tel:360 3794450 I Fax 360.379.4451 I Email: dcd@co iefferson.wa.us Building Permits&Inspections I Development Consistency Review I Long Range Planning I Watershed Stewardship Resource Center Pre-Application Conference The Jefferson County Code (JCC) requires that before an application is made for all Type II and Type Ill project applications and Type I applications proposing impervious surfaces of ten thousand (10,000) square feet or more and/or non-single family structures of five thousand (5,000) square feet or more, a pre-application consultation must be held. The consultation includes preliminary review and administrative assistance. This service does not include extensive field inspection or correspondence. Pre-application consultation does not limit subsequent administrative review. At the conference, Department of Community Development personnel shall provide the applicant with: (1) A list of the requirements for a completed application; (2) A general summary of the procedures to be used to process the application; (3) The references to relevant code provisions or development standards that may apply to the approval of the application; and (4) A list of any applicable hourly review fees that may be charged by one or more County agencies upon the filing of a project permit application with the County. Discussions at the conference or the information provided by the staff shall not bind or prohibit the County's future application or enforcement of all applicable laws and regulations. No statements or assurances made by County representatives shall in any way relieve the applicant of his or her duty to submit an application consistent with all relevant requirements of County, state and federal codes, laws, regulations and land use plans. Bill Staples / Dream City, LLC NAME: MAILINGADDRESS: 1192 57th Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 TELEPHONE:(HOME 520-400-2345 (WORK) REPRESENTATIVE: Simon Little / studioSTL, Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: 210 N. Victory Avenue, Port Townsend, WA 98368 TELEPHONE: (HOME) 360-640-8814 (WORK) f i d.: ; (11 I1 !!;I ill ire—(C �-- -"-.7-. 7:1";''''1,1 1. Please answer all questions on this form completely. 2. Attach a sketch of the Conceptual Design for the proposed use or activity, showing the following information: a. Vicinity sketch; b. North arrow and scale; n r c. Property boundaries and identification of land uses on adjacent properties; v � L` d. Means of ingress and egress; �i � ~- '�' e. Property/lot drainage; , I L f. Possible locations of sewage disposal and water supply systems; IL/ ` 8 204g. Location of utility easements; and � '� �`, SEP h. Proposed location of buildings, including setbacks to property boundaries. I' , L _� 3. Attach payment of the applicable fee, as set forth in the Jefferson County Fee Ordinance. "' Sid CGUNIY PM[NT_ I' Ce, `• # 15153 ' '/O/ ' — Pyt_ ` • , ��E _ / 1 /et c; I I 51 50-1 1�U 7 EN e� Property Description General Location: One mile South of the City Limits. Turn West off of SR-20 onto W. Fredricks Street. The property is located two tenths of a mile from the intersection. It is on the North side of W. Fredricks Street. Legal Description(from Property Tax Statement): EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13, LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN VAC ALLEY, SOPHIA ST, & SNAC ELWOOD ST ADJ 9-Digit Parcel Number(from Property Tax Statement): 94860/301 Total Acreage: 1 .8 Zone: LI % Lot Coverage: 43 Applicant: ❑ Owner ❑ Lessee 8 Contract Purchaser ❑ Other Project Description We are proposing to build three agriculture structures. Two structures will handle interior growing operations and will be pre-engineered metal buildings of a Type IIB construction. The third structure will consist of seven gutter-connected greenhouses, categorized as temporary building structures. The existing septic system Is planned to support the minimal employees. The site has an existing PUD water and power scrvicc. Property Owner(name and mailing address): Bill Staples / Dream City, LLC 1192 57th Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 Standard Disclosure Information provided to a prospective applicant during the pre-application consultation is based on County regulations in effect at the time of the pre-application consultation. Revised or new County regulations could affect a future development application. A pre- application consultation does not vest a future development application. By signing the application form,the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities, judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees, representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. This right of entry shall expire when the County (through the Administrator or the Administrator's representatives) concludes the application has complied with all applicable laws and regulations. Access and right of entry to the applicant's property shall be requested and shall occur only during regular business hours. (SIGNATURE) (DATE) I hereby designate Simon Little to act as my agent in matters related to this pre-application conference. ER S s. 09-18-14 r (LANDOW ER SIGNATURE) (DATE) nh' SEP 1 8 2014 1� JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT.OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT G1PermitCenterl#tt#FORMS##If1DRE\CurrentDRDForms\pre-app conference form_FINAL.doc REV.11/1/2013 Paget PRE14-00021 Pre-Application Conference Department of Community Development Bill Staples/Simon Little: Marijuana Production &Processing County Attendees: Eric Kuzma, PW; Frank Benskin, BLD;Tom Aumock, Fire Consultant;Joel Peterson, DRD Time & Date: October 15, 2014, 10:00-11:00 a.m. Owner/Applicant: Bill Staples, Dream City LLC Agent: Simon Little,STL Studios Location: 192 W. Fredericks Street, Port Townsend, Parcel#948601301 Description of Proposal: The proposal is a Tier 3 marijuana production facility that includes two new 7,000 square foot buildings for indoor grow area; seven new 3,120 square foot greenhouse structures attached for a total footprint of 21,840 s.f.; an existing shop with plumbing, and existing carport. Note: Application to the State Liquor Control Board also seeks a license for marijuana processing privileges at this location, but processing is not part of the Pre-Application Conference materials provided by the prospective applicant. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT–Eric Kuzma ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT–Handout from Susan Porto BUILDING DIVISION, DCD–Frank Benskin FIRE CODE REVIEW–Tom Aumock DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION, DCD-Joel Peterson • Zoning: Light Industrial (LI); adjacent to LI on the east side, LI/Commercial on the south side, and Residential 1:5 on north and west sides. Allowed Use • Chapter 18.15 JCC,Table 3-1: Agriculture, see 18.20.030: Agriculture is an allowed use in all zones. • Moratorium by Ordinance No.07-0811-14: Does not affect this location in Light Industrial Zone • Subject to State License requirements of RCW 69.50.325—Proposal is not found within a 1000- foot restriction area. 1 Performance and Use-Specific Standards • 18.20.030(2)(b)(vii)(G)—Temporary Growing Structures defined at RCW 19.27.015 • 18.20.160 Conversions of land to non-forestry use—Forest Practices. Class IV General Permit from Department of Natural Resources, with SEPA review and Stormwater management review by Jefferson County(18.30.070). Contact Ross Goodwin, Forest Practice Forester, Olympic Region,Washington State Department of Natural Resources(DNR), 360-460-0900, ross.goodwin@dnr.wa.gov. • 18.40.750 SEPA(State Environmental Protection Act)—Required for combined structures >12,000 square feet floor area; clearing/grading over 500 cubic yards of material. Submit Environmental Checklist for SEPA review. Development Standards • 18.30.050 Setback requirements in Light Industrial: 25-foot setback for property lines adjacent to Residential; 20-foot setback from Fredericks Street; 10-foot setback from LI parcel to east. 10-foot interior setback. • Stormwater Minimum Requirements#1 through#10. > 5000 s.f. impervious surface • 18.30.020 (5) General Development Standards--Transportation. Applicant shall be required to provide necessary improvements if transportation facilities are not adequate. • Chapter 18.30 JCC—Development Standards: 1. Max. area Impervious Surface in LI: 55%. Proposal currently at 50%. 2. 18.30.050, Table 6-1, Note 18: Glen Cove Light Industrial District allowances with CUP (Type III) 3. Max. building size: 10,000 s.f. Can go up to 20,000 s.f. with CUP 4. Max. building height: 35ft. Height can go up to 50 ft. with CUP 5. 18.30.130 "Screen-A" (15-feet) and "Screen-B" (10-feet) standards apply 6. Fulfill Site Plan Requirements for septic 7. Landscaping Plan, Parking Plan, Lighting& Noise considerations • Existing structure permitted as "Garage/Storage Building" (BLD02-574) and will need Change of Use permit if used as a residence. Mapped Critical Areas:Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area Application Elements&Fees: • Master Land Use Application • Site Plan • Clearing & Grading/Stormwater Management Permit: $380.00 DCD+$600 PW • SEPA Review: $760.00 • Conditional Use Permit (18.40 JCC) —Type III process 18.40.270 (Public Notice): $2056.00+ includes the SEPA review($760.00). • Building Permit Applications: fees based on valuation • Demolition Permit, if necessary OTHER REGULATORY/LAND USE CONSIDERATIONS • Washington State Liquor Control Board–All licenses granted by WSLCB must comply with WAC 314-55. • Washington Department of Natural Resources– Forest Practices Application (FPA) • Department of Ecology–water use in Watershed Resource Inventory Area 16 (WRIA 16) • Olympic Region Clean Air Agency (ORCAA)–"Denver's Best Management Practices" as guideline • Governor's Office of Regulatory Innovation and Assistance (ORIA)—Guidance Documents Assurances are unavailable. Discussions at the Pre-Application Conference are not binding,and no statement made by county representatives shall in any way relieve applicant of the duty to submit an application consistent with all relevant regulations and requirements. Thomas L.Aumock Consulting Fire Code Inspector&Plans Examiner Jefferson County Department of Community Development 2303 Hendricks Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 (360)385-3938 Email:taumock@co.jefferson.wa.us Cell: (360)643-0272 Plan Review Memorandum To: Joel Peterson,Assoc. Planner,Department of Community 0 ev•lopment,Jefferson County Fr: Thomas L. Aumock,Consulting Fire Code Ins. mss. " Dt: 03 November 2014 Re: PRE14-21,Dream City,LLC Pre-Application: Plot 'Ian This plans examiner is in receipt of the pre-application for the above-referenced proposal from your office, and have reviewed the proposal with the International Fire Code [I.F.C.], 2012 Edition. The following constitutes this consulting Fire Code Inspector findings and recommendations. The pre-application plot plan was submitted for review for compliance with the I.F.C. I find that the plot plan, version 10/28/2014, complies with International Fire Code Section 503.1.1 as meeting the access road requirement to allow fire apparatus to within 150 feet of all portions of the facilities. 0.75 hours was logged in the receipt,review,report,and filing of this memo t r;C. 6/Lei Jr w1b�ArtQ.„ 5`EMc�'�.� 4.5 0Li-WM yz.r NA, Ezdt) _ -e 11 Z Cvrf „A., ryle,t etf Cf��Q Utet 72�sr. --skcrlr, fLeck LA k_Ne. cop m J V3'l�ry►�rZt�e � ,.�E�►�� <v '2 € 89£86 VM `ON3SNMO112iOd I-- Icif S 1.332:118 6)1012:130323d 'MZ61. No €sg., La jitlAi iii Oil '.11l0 Wb'31OQ ,- 113 41 hi Q Z y 2 02 $ — m ° H DL!__II S y oU C 0 L N O O " 2i O .0 Q d O LLJ cel i O. mol1O6 I 006cm -p ? qa -N2•ooO ' � 0 ° Sik •o � Q O H O vi ;nom O a•�va °•mraO ,� hDUU �+ p on QUOcp EouoUaU` z � 2U � 2U o � 2U �2Ho ° DE0O6g ,. o. oa¢ o o O I o Fo -02 -0CU ` C O XLo _. OU OU a OU -0Ow € E ° caUmmU0 GCL '5U0mU0mV � mmUao ° ° a '+ c. ovoc Qa3 ? u{ Ce • Z� LL ;Nil u3do2:1d — — :` I�4I9135 Q�kfJ. 3QI5 I 3NV 1 32Nd ———— o 9 1 FI t::::.:•:, „A„ 9NIa1ln9 \ I :3at „ . .35f10HN33ZI9 c.1 `'' 1Lh:. • ' m II OS' .:.:.:.:...., __\.\\ _b = ,ZGxiZ (G)_.\\_„ ___.\\_ coLA‹ inx .:_ :;.% i:.:::::::::11 35fOHN33Z9 . ,o� ;r _ __ _ , .. ' �� \\\\\\\\\\\ \\ \\ E.::::. :: P r ”I �� , e rvb Y :. I::: •�.::1 .„ , ,.......,...„ ,,, - -s h. : ..„, .. . +: z 1:.: 0 ::: Nu , ...... , ::, ,I ,�d 1_ _ _ 9N�a1In9 N 0 r CZ . .', \1. 05 Y r z �, , IL I';: _ _ _ 35f10HN3N9 I —111 E .:::5 ::: ;1 'rr . V - - 4.* \ i.,::........:..9.-le /moi �� C."-.•;':11 >"-- ,,.., .-...:.:. `'t °' , , ,,,ppp��� / -i IA : :::..,i, : U • •- ,... .. tu Fa) 6 `° - i 111 :„.....* rt:-:::".....:a < , z z K.:.:. . 1_ Q rr h:`:'»' `4`. I n < 1....::: / Z6 S t. 1•°: :' Q :'' Xaa w'.'. . 4( ;�, ,','; I t • om`. .. Z W °'— �" Ce >IO�19135 Q2:1Y,. 3QIS ,-. .-aye 4.-,-., ,z rrs—,errs .-.�-r,-.�.—..���.*.� � �e; :,-..:-::+:::+-`-..7.:77:7.7,a . , .re.,, . , , r ,,... s , . , , a . , '.'.°:.'.°. ," `r a . . , s . s i e , , ,7.7.- fa�, :;:; ..... :;:;:; :;;;:;:YN1Ni32;?.4 'Jr SaN'i%'1:a: ::::: :� : , , 3N1-1 .11?J3dOT d CZ Joel Peterson From: Joel Peterson Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 3:35 PM To: Thomas &Traci's Email (taumock@cablespeed.com) Cc: Mary Blain Subject: Membrane Fire Proofing--FW: Dream City greenhouses Tom, I heard back from Dream City regarding the greenhouses. I need your help pulling together the issues of a)the fire resistance rating of the greenhouse membrane; and b) the 36" safety clearance from the greenhouse membrane. (See email below.) Is the fire resistance rating determining the 36" clearance, and we're good; or is there some other information regarding the membrane fire resistance that influences the construction requirements and inspection requirements? Do I need some specific information from Simon Little regarding the Material Safety Data Sheet or what kind of polymer this is? Did we miss some construction requirement in our approval like sprinkler system? On the permit for the Pre-engineered greenhouses(BLD14-00462),there is a "third party inspection by engineer to verify proper installation of greenhouses". I do not see a fire inspection activity. The permit has been revised so greenhouses are now outfitted with "heat tubes" and will have watering"hydronics". I'm copying Mary on this too. I'm kind-of lost on what I need to do at this point. Thanks. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson@co.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW ASAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From:Simon Little [mailto:simon@studio-stl.com] Sent: Monday,June 08, 2015 1:00 PM To:Joel Peterson Subject: Dream City greenhouses Joel, In response to your inquiry as to the material being used on the sidewalls of the greenhouses,that material is a plastic membrane. Per our dialog at the Pre-App Conference the plan is to keep a 36" clear aisle at the perimeter > Joel Peterson To: Simon Little Subject: RE: Dream City Site Plan Version 10-28-2014 Simon: Here's a quick update: 1) Yesterday, I received a memo from Tom Aumock that states the 10/28/2014 version of your site plan complies with International Fire Code Section 503.1.1 as meeting the access road requirement to allow fire apparatus to within 150 feet of all portions of the facilities. 2) Frank Benskin says to be sure to submit with your building permit, information about the greenhouse buildings regarding what materials they will be constructed of. 3) I see that the northwest corner of the property depicted on the site plan needs to show landscape screening along the entire property line. There is that odd corner that doesn't show screening on the plan. I'll check further on the landscaping requirements for parking—i.e. if they apply here since it is interior to the property line screening. 4) When the road vacation is completed,the site plan appears to meet the land use and building requirements. There will be additional reviewers when the permit applications are circulated. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpetersongco.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From:Simon Little [mailto:simon@studio-stl.com] Sent:Tuesday, October 28, 2014 1:19 PM To:Joel Peterson Subject: Re: Dream City Site Plan Joel, The security fence will be along the interior line of the vegetation screening along the North, South, and West property edges. The fencing will be at the property line along the East boundary as that will become an interior lot line between two Light Industrial land uses once the vacating process is complete. t Thanks, Simon Little 360.640.8814 studio-stl.com On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Joel Peterson<JPeterson(aco.jefferson.wa.us> wrote: Simon, Thank you for the site plan revision. One initial question: Do I use the setback line as a depiction of the security fence line, or is that feature not on the lan yet? p Thanks. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 j Peterson pco.jefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary 2 From:Simon Little [mailto:simon@studio-stl.coml Sent:Tuesday, October 28, 2014 12:46 PM To:Joel Peterson Subject: Dream City Site Plan Joel, Per our conversation, attached is the updated version of the Dream City, LLC site plan for 192 W. Fredericks Street. It takes into consideration the vacating of the Louisa right of way to the East of the property. Due to the age of the plat that is being categorized as a Class "C" Vacating process and will be done as a "Quiet Title" in front of the Supreme Court. Dream City's attorney has begun that process. Please feel free to contact me to discuss this site plan at your convenience, and please let Tom and Frank know they can contact me directly as well. Thanks Joel, Simon Little 360.640.8814 studio-stl.com 3 Joel Peterson /// To: GOODWIN, ROSS (DNR) Subject: RE: Land clearing proposal -parcel 948601301 Thank you Ross. This is good information. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson Aco.iefferson.wa.us Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From:GOODWIN, ROSS (DNR) [mailto:ROSS.GOODWIN@dnr.wa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 10:43 AM To:Joel Peterson Cc: marc.h@dreamcitybud.com Subject: Land clearing proposal - parcel 948601301 Hi Joel, Marc Hilt gave be a call regarding the parcel listed above, located on Fredricks St. He stated you wanted to know if a Forest Practice permit would be necessary for clearing the vegetation. I looked at the parcel late last week. There is a lot of"brush" species of trees including willow and some marginally merchantable Douglas fir trees. The short answer is that if they do not sell or trade for services any of the vegetative material, a Forest Practice permit will not be required. Additionally there is at least one existing structure on site. Per DNR danger tree policy any trees within a tree length and a half of a permanent structure do not require a permit from us to be removed. If you have any other questions or need more clarification on our regulations feel free to give me a call. Ross Goodwin Forest Practice Forester Olympic Region Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) 360-460-0900 ross.goodwin@dnr.wa.gov 1 R71, 1"NAIIM 4017' ti. ct 4 ei7( 9�r� FPA )(4.1/A ._._ i, A . ..c• _ ,.& '.a jam. .A a • ke4k r4 fly, te.M0• 649 - -11Vb _.. 1g7^fr^. 5'5— '3'; (e, a4' k267/1_ _' '11 q Yp��, 5'0 = 1'1 � �EI� �LS�'�'t-2Y� F. ®/t fYvm e2, SVA ° AP i'V V1-"r —4 _(rcJ. 1 Joel Peterson From: Simon Little <simon@studio-stl.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 1:19 PM To: Joel Peterson Subject: Re: Dream City Site Plan Joel, The security fence will be along the interior line of the vegetation screening along the North, South, and West property edges. The fencing will be at the property line along the East boundary as that will become an interior lot line between two Light Industrial land uses once the vacating process is complete. Thanks, Simon Little rle1i 3.0.640.8814 studio-stl.com On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Joel Peterson<JPeterson(aico jefferson.wa.us>wrote: Simon, Thank you for the site plan revision. One initial question: Do I use the setback line as a depiction of the security fence line, or is that feature not on the plan yet? Thanks. Joel Joel Peterson Associate Planner,Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street * Port Townsend,WA 98368 Phone 360-379-4457 * Fax 360-379-4451 jpeterson CaJco.iefferson.wa.us 1 Jefferson County DCD Mission: To preserve and enhance the quality of life in Jefferson County by promoting a vibrant economy, sound communities and a healthy environment. All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW SAVE PAPER - Please do not print this e-mail unless absolutely necessary From:Simon Little [mailto:simon@studio-stl.com] Sent:Tuesday, October 28, 2014 12:46 PM To:Joel Peterson Subject: Dream City Site Plan Joel, Per our conversation, attached is the updated version of the Dream City, LLC site plan for 192 W. Fredericks Street. It takes into consideration the vacating of the Louisa right of way to the East of the property. Due to the age of the plat that is being categorized as a Class "C" Vacating process and will be done as a "Quiet Title" in front of the Supreme Court. Dream City's attorney has begun that process. Please feel free to contact me to discuss this site plan at your convenience, and please let Tom and Frank know they can contact me directly as well. Thanks Joel, Simon Little 360.640.8814 2 Joel Peterson From: Simon Little <simon@studio-stl.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 12:46 PM To: Joel Peterson Subject: Dream City Site Plan Attachments: 1415 Dream City A1.1 10-28-14.pdf Joel, Per our conversation, attached is the updated version afA.he DI-ea Ci , LLC site plan for 192 W. Fredericks Street. It takes into consideratio eating of the Louisa right of way to •e East of the property. Due to the age of the plat that is,+eing categorized as a Class "C" Vacating process and '11 be done as a "Quiet Title" in front of the Supreme Cou . : _ ' orne has be u..• •. _ - Please feel free to contact me to discuss this site plan at your convenience, and please let Tom and Frank know they can contact me directly as well. Thanks Joel, Simon Little 0.36 640.8814 studio-stl.com 1 I • IP-AGENT LAND USE: RESIDENTIA 0 PROPERTY LINE ---` SCy In A I N REEx A ., o• 73 r _ SIDD SETEAGK E YAR x. l' rn ,., ..... z , (.4 i ).. ,g -ii - ,,--- ,,,--- ,,,-(- ,,,-- - ...,, > ( ., U> O d Itt �i;�N}T� -i. L z �t Y Y �j I tti (SII N0 NI Z Th--- -i t v� � " r rr � ', � -< 0 L ! IT -11 I -VI''r'''' "' 0 A 0 0 N..r il n 'T„ I i I , I I z < z r00 ( o nz I rntt �I 1 d'� F" � zNn d i 110 icuu � l`I V 11•t I �rr �� � r 3 rn 0N- p y ' fn ,...... n rn 1 I , I Z i — 1 �V um< ,7i _ ;d ofi -4 S O I A r✓ ,,,' r.'r .Z(1 r''f ,'''r ✓, „ ,''r 25-0" ✓, d r N r' r N rr r r N✓ M� rn 6. 1.- nl3 i -0 z ' fn /' r r' ''• ' b 3-4 CTI /\ , -1 ) (�1 rn V I rr ^ I d t.1.tv\ / ,,� I-CJ r r ,. .r' I w Y la I . P f• I/ 71 ^ •,Vti /r ',N, ,r' i ro v rf •N r'' 36 I J r ,/ r. N,rr l,r IIJ L9. '' r,r0`I/' 1 ' V o ✓ / 1 — o — — SIDE YARD SETBAGKr �0 — _ 1 b gyp, Fl / PROPERTY LINE II ADJACENT LAND USE: VACATED STREET A. . '40 N Z • i _....4? ci < � C 17 iffl Q ➢ 0 o / n N _-4 u A A moo-' (-.0 0 c N c W . i 5 . :.--e 1 St rtit: M —0 0 5R 20 (v ,,I: a i= = o D DREAM CITY, LLC alill! vl -� 192 W. FREDRICKS STREET 111P 11i 3 ; PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 ::,...,:j::-4-tc,illiLt:...,1:',..1;.‘f.:_r-60,,,,.. _:.., f// f/3dY°3 -�� - -- er 4,.: < z C : t gnaw Wee f . o F G^ n �' �O o a a a n v ^ '� n : 0 „ .....,_.....,---. i il© w ,.,,,.. �_ vV� (0: ,,,,:i, ^ = — = ^ !! . .11111 jui,!=t,11 IF V ril,4 ' ^1a it �' � ti; L . l L off,, _ Cl-� _-4L.,,q- f,e0 .z ..' jt _ "V_1, cl II al Inipt,inri Mil ME! '.. .F tJ- 41 qiii T._; a 1 9, Li 1 i ,, ip EG/ZABET (urC . zr-ic Y t.ii ' V - ; ® � Ile 4 i =�v 1� IBM A yy • - ., .. L 7-7.„' �, _.._4_ b --- �i,1 MUM ` I ° cei V: / ps v� '2".-" a. 1LL/A, � ' v a__z-- . �1 r-Il 1 C° v__ 4 kr .._ 1 ‘, ---A „, . kt,...t . , c ,_� _= i o rl OT TO S'77 tt-.,uoPn :y-1T S: �p �� 021 OK= FIN/1111 ‘0,',., firTt ,i f:-3-6:1 60: z. ,. 11 ® v .a T =A© Ear > h i/© 1MI NMI �!© g7 © ,, n Q� ^ vis.e" I. 4 CLFMEN77Nr .f'T 0. t P O M1 rr ; Tr Y Pt �ZI3i Ai ELI "Mk ME . ice p _ e-b `,..0,L ,.:_,,,„,,,,,,,L_^ 21111,,,,,;Pillkm ...____NE,.P1611. ‘,. VIM 1111111_14.. PPR_:„,.., •-f t•-r e. i ,t _.,c_ ° r Y .J. ' f(.,.,_ f 11 tt 11 'Li r 17 j ui ... .., _ k i. Y y c_ i, N a irg 68- z V°,kd'7 Case Review Time Tracking: DCD Review from 10/1/2014 to 10/31/2014 for PRE14-00021. (Hourly Rate = $76.00) PRE14-00021 DREAM CITY LLC 10/13/2014 60 Review 2014-10-13: pre-app review--jmp Joel Peterson 10/13/2014 20 Review 2014-09-30: scheduling w/Simon Little--jmp Joel Peterson 10/20/2014 90 Review 2014-10-14: pre-app review--jmp Joel Peterson 10/20/2014 60 Review 2014-10-14: PRE14-21 review--jmp Joel Peterson 10/20/2014 30 Review 2014-10-15: prep & photocopy meeting materials--jmp Joel Peterson 10/20/2014 90 Review 2014-10-15: Pre-Application Conference 1.5 hours--jmp Joel Peterson 10/20/2014 30 Review 2014-10-17: 10-min tc w/Simon Joel Peterson 2014-1020: email reply to Simon, 20-min, landscaping--jmp 380 minutes (6.33 hours) $481.33 Total 380 minutes (6.33 hours) $481.33 1 10/20/201, 1ltidemark1data1formslr_DCD. INVOICE Date: 10/20/2014 Invoice ID: DCD14PRE14-00021 �$soN co JEFFERSON COUNTY 4 G2� DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT < 621 Sheridan Street I Port Townsend, WA 98368 360-379-4450 I email: dcd@co.Jefferson.wa.us �ysHr` 'O2 www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment Date Due: BILLING ADDRESS: 11/19/2014 DREAM CITY LLC P.O BOX 1909 PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368 Fire Marshall Review 76.00 DPW Pre App FEE 121.00 REMIT TO: Zoning Pre-Application 101.00 Jefferson County DCD Total Amount Due: $298.00 621 Sheridan St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 Please return the above portion with your payment Permit Number: PRE14-00021 Fire Marshall Review 76.00 DPW Pre App FEE 121.00 Zoning Pre-Application 101.00 Total Amount Due: $298.00 Payment is accepted by cash, check, debit or credit card (Visa, Mastercard, Discover, American Express) To pay by credit card, go to www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment, and click on the "Online Credit Card & echeck Payments" link on the left side of the page. (questions: call 360-379-4450) NOTES (5/19/14) Joel Peterson 18.40.090 Pre-Application Conference Pre-application conferences provide a prospective applicant and the county the opportunity to determine if and how the regulations may apply,an opportunity to acquaint the applicant with the requirements of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code,and to discuss—if applicable—how the applicant may modify the scope and design of the project to reduce or avoid restrictions which may be imposed by the county. Provides: 1. List of requirements for a complete application 2. A general summary of procedures to be used to process the application 3. The references to the relevant code provision or development standards that may apply to the approval of the application 4. A list of any applicable hourly review fees that may be charged by one or more county agencies upon the filing of a project permit application with the county. Assurances Unavailable, not binding, and no statement made by county representatives shall in any way relieve applicant of duty to submit applicant consistent with requirements. 18.15 Table 3-1 Allowable Uses Cottage Industry in RR1:5 is a Conditional (discretionary) Use • The purpose of the conditional use permit process is to provide flexibility in the application of the use regulations contained in the Code in order to accommodate used that may be appropriate in an established (zoning)district under certain circumstances, but inappropriate in the same district under others. Review impacts. Weigh public need or benefit derived, against impacts that it may cause. • This permit review will go through the Type III permit decision process (see 18.40.520 (2)(a)(ii)) 18.20 Performance and Use-Specific Standards • The performance standards provided in this chapter are those specific requirements that must be met before approval may be given for a proposed development or use within a particular land use district. 18.20.170 Cottage Industry • (4)(a): The cottage industry shall be operated by at least one full-time, bona fide resident in a single- family residence of the parcel on which the proposed use is being requested. Chapter 18.30 JCC—Development Standards • Criteria associated with the development and redevelopment of land wee Ve\flen ccs rt). Z7rf^ et4A7 -4-/g rA"4-4-7r7-,-4 s" 4Y- i/r' let r ee n 1-0 vt 5 cis 64- it-g-vf. ` 1.� -?v,z)v v -I %Jn 1+ oe,Y 5- - tee.. 4(741.•-4-ci DCPA ss1 ra,47ozi , ? z-. ti-s i ;( cen ,0-04,1 1e v ? m2" - Sz r ¢�,� D AAt, lit « "2-6-4A4101 1.0, 1r( 05 C39 -01 s Co‘) `,Sc r,'le 1 w+ zKlothafili 1( 6 -\ Ift (. r 607 4. t 50^6,ty7 rlrt9»-• n? CO 4 1 C Pc4L )o1" lirY6.a 2 5 4 409LOPM SOL 101108994 109109111,11 t to,ogee pogioggroo £0910991,6 is mfOMP.. M _ Sig • C.,zr4V.,,•.,‘" cc= -- - 50E00991,6 POZTO9e1.6 .0Z0.54R1.6 . , 60910991,6 MU ROWS , 1.0(4084it. i,091.09RP6 '- Z091.09106 COSIC90 • 105109106 FOCI.M06 "Par ''"1111111r 1•1,4 =109814 .1 411t. ;0C109Btr6 1001099K zortosea6 Loz imps =Mr- 100099P6 pozcceet5 ‘02009W6 10£1098176 N/d 'slopapaid *A4 Z6T i( s4-►bk‘ ( /1,/*(7_ S o -Ydo - 2_3\ c s /12/2 o34::. /B. 20 . oma, 0-) Ca-) rt co.! inv,r-e4 c01-41,15 - 1,0-.vel cI /0. 20 , /‘.o —roar,-us -s 1/4 4z, /700- f 14c - gy rus ail L A rsc,i ✓' /6 . 30 . 0(.0 p 1 , o 7 0 - S`ts n,rxfk,t,, Aria( (jA '' hl iL C6,129 & cytnar1 ( cor-QSi" (AA-) c+.qg 1'1 C4i v-1 \A)D1 cove�J� 9�m�v. 0 mr✓� J4ry+ ,L, 1 J f3 O /g , zn . 030 (2 -)Cb)(-vi') S4hAeAtir-Qi5 s• d S - v`(o ( 01.4,6y5 NG. 1--te fie, (-0 cb) t.r ) CEJ - rszni 546A-4_ 61/k"i to('4 GA& ((n• 19 •27 61.C )$ p v,-s te.or,61' b 5^ )�i - 20 - 0 (3, tee5 LLetfc,j (4) .-xi--L. €29 i,s1 iVALA dot (b' \ t-e qx. i, /8 _- 20 - )65 C'J (°D se-17A gr<q u1r4 /S-2a , /?o Co`-utij 1717,2e. 6-1 .4716(41 `^ (rite 5*rva vr1r -N ems.. ikYC-C15 arta A ir.vb Cmvt.o+.7.e S'ro LA, is ' (,r eoe ckL,� 98/676 e cs-z, = '13,271, M e '1/i01 wrL vvYb-tn�.tit �' to�.V lc- (� M Avrii t�WII 1 "t'oVP 4�J c '- ka, ®6 U�1�- fib' u rvte� nj(c� 1 ', j'_ s' 1 so $ : C�IR n � � -LL r ertd' " `its C.e. /o, -16,o SO" Vol .1'6, 3,L ' + y , 1 10411I � = °� yi ,, �,� -;)ctizc. L) A 2 v,o co 5- ►Vlrvr Lt /l44 t/441-) CgrOS -c °` '� ztti5 cL7,4 - i4/ CwtA4,uses VDU 6 r1W\ W , S L1 D h / V, out Cbo 9 55 3 s> 37y 4c - Am-iNtf 3Y , 00S = % 5 .P• I$ CLearlylij ,ef S— -yo( SEP ^,t 1 r�i�een �Uu&4d?i5 S‘Az . r}o /' + 3M v� 41)1}k) 61,4v 5 o 5- oet, 411 cl A s3i2t, (?,i,aD s-C, t/d) ? u z- ik'sl — ‘s 141c� 411 4/1 la-1( use ? v _ 5eavkil �� - /38 c CD A ilt As'-►n � ,,�.�/ T 1 tervku�5 C — ' - X1`5 c.,..0( 3 , IDcriA 6.7 - ,n271 s, d' CPoediz )01- I` ,cx, )114 'Pr\ (7 -) 1444,4#14; pw) d , ,30 /`f a L'949 4 • f p rm� /t iee3521 fiCtu-f d)�S - d if crR 5/ C01-4n q"StdrL At(gen y - s t )0,4pr i>/ p4.44 Alevw-N cit -iine D. 1T'e;De7 ' = So' Se 1 Ac bk. ; i4v 1" 7 R42,GA Fr-k,Ctow jai-71 G t P 1 mer Sys roll Piarle- r2-1-1/6-201 (3,1 p{~✓ 01-Q-% tM tive0er- std 197e ADJACENT LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 0 I) PROPERTY LINE rn A I brn —P41/1— i: : _ II 7) SIDE YARD SETBACK 'I, ••••....... - — — Z 1 472 /� r DT — 1 1� v, i ''' 00 d �' :b0 L 7 ' I rn 0 rrr% ,' r'' 0�n n 7<—K 0 �2 �..� In 1 �� / Z � II —{ -11 ' .1776„, ( Qt� trr, r � I � o �2 V : h1 I ek P rH313!Pt � rn i Trn , A r'' ' Np l Ian rn A 1 , d I cs-' '•'' z rr # '� l CU � I rNn /A 1 `S (1 A - 0 D m rJ > 1 ill �� I y (p 7C I yGlZ z d ` ,- 1 1 1 r yy 70'-0" r'' 'r ,,' r' � N f' ' ''''' "• r'fir• ' ,, :' �' r .+, 'rr r �y U -1 O '.•=— , 7 - ' - s= - - , 0',--- Y!+/ %-,,, _„ f Oni Z rn YX r- ,/ ,r ' .;'''+r` r• e / r:,+ - -� -a ' --/' Ill 'Z I r r,, ' ,r r ' G1 1 ;' .,• JC I d .. ' r' rr' .,''' ,C T r•' ,.� fr' rr MIN. -,,.. 'r r --r, .'p k k ++ ..e_ __,.%r'r , -''' rL r'' �y7 ` r — te ''r ('!lr,r+r•',,✓r�' r ,rr",• /rte ' 1 r '/ 1 � �. err• � ,II r'''''. I ill r '� r r r� � 0 71 I r r r= -, —, '7.4 -' --.'' - r • rr' ',r i, , ,r r, ''''-'.//'---'- rte, , O �r r v rr 1 IlP i ''r a : o b SIDE YARD SETBACK — - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+- PROPERTY LINE 1 I ADJACENT LAND USE: VACATED STREET NO g ' N ----------------------- 1 ED Z 1 ._L.- , - r� _, rn 0 Zi -rj -- C —0. �!1 N f O o 'J C7 I A r� 6 A o cn 3511 cf) > rn ;. SR 20 11$1! i!'1111 8 D DREAM CITY, LLC sm e 1 1 ill 2" 192 W. FREDRICKS STREET s PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 2 r f 1 18.30.130 Landscaping/screening. (1)Application. Landscaping or screening shall be provided for all multifamily residential, commercial and industrial land uses, small-scale recreational and tourist uses, and as required in other sections of this code, except that landscaping will not be required of industrial uses within the resource-based industrial district when the development is sufficiently screened from public view. (2)General Provisions. (a) Existing trees, vegetative plantings, undisturbed open space, and/or topographic or natural features which meet or exceed these standards shall be considered to fulfill the landscaping or screening requirements of this section and any other applicable reference to these screening requirements in other sections of this code. (b)The administrator may authorize variations to the landscaping/screening requirements of this section to: (i) Provide consideration of topography, natural features, existing native vegetation and soils on the site and site location in relation to adjacent and surrounding uses; (ii)Allow alternative plant mixes or berming that accomplish the purposes of the type of landscape screening required; (iii) Conserve water through the concept of xeriscaping; (iv) Provide flexibility in the size of initial plantings; and (v) Ensure that any nonresidential use, structure or activity when proposed in a rural residential (RR)district shall be compatible with that of existing and anticipated future uses in the district. (3) Landscape Screening. The three types of landscaping screens are described and applied as follows. (a)"Screen-A" landscaping: (i) Is a"full screen"that functions as a visual barrier. This landscaping is typically found between residential and nonresidential areas; (ii) Shall at a minimum consist of: (A)A mix of primarily evergreen trees and shrubs generally interspersed to form a continuous year-round screen that grows to at least eight feet in height within two growing seasons. (b)"Screen-B" landscaping: (i) Is a"filtered screen" that functions as a visual separator. This landscaping is typically found between commercial and industrial uses; between differing types of residential development; and to screen industrial uses from the road; (ii) Shall at a minimum consist of: (A)A mix of evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs generally interspersed to create a filtered screen that grows to at least eight feet in height within two growing seasons. (c) "Screen-C" landscaping: (i) Is a"see-through screen" that functions as a partial visual separator to soften the appearance of parking areas and building elevations. This landscaping is typically found along road frontage or between multiple-family developments; (ii) Shall at a minimum consist of: (A)A mix of evergreen and deciduous trees or shrubs generally interspersed to create a continuous canopy. (4) Landscaping Road Frontages. The average width or depth of perimeter landscaping along road frontages and required locations on private property shall be provided as follows: (a) Ten feet of Screen-B landscaping shall be provided for an industrial development. (b) Ten feet of Screen-B landscaping shall be provided for all above-ground utility facilities or development, excluding distribution and transmission corridors, located outside a public right-of way. (c) Ten feet of Screen-C landscaping shall be provided for all commercial or multiple-family residential development. (5) Landscaping of Interior Lot Lines. The average width or depth of perimeter landscaping along interior lot lines shall be provided as follows: (a) Fifteen feet of Screen-A landscaping shall be included in all commercial, industrial, or small- scale recreational and tourist development along any portion adjacent to a residential use or district, except as may be varied by the administrator under subsection (2)(b)of this section. (b) Ten feet of Screen-B landscaping shall be included in all multiple-family development along any portion adjacent to a single-family residential use and in an industrial development along any portion adjacent to a nonindustrial development, except as provided in subsection (5)(a) of this section. e . (6) Landscaping for Parking Lots. Landscaping shall be provided for commercial, industrial, small-scale recreational and tourist uses, and multifamily residential use surface parking lots, with five or more parking stalls, as follows: (a) Screening shall be provided on each side, front, and/or rear of a parking lot where such side, front, and/or rear abuts any residential use or district, except that no screening is required where the elevation of the parking area lot line is four feet higher than the finished elevation of the parking area surface. (b) Parking lot screening and landscaping shall be kept in good condition and shall meet the following conditions: (i) It shall be continuous where required along a side, front or rear of a parking area and shall not be less than four feet in height above the grade of the parking lot surface, broken only for accessways and aisles; provided, that the screening shall not be permitted for a distance of 20 feet on each side of a parking area accessway to ensure proper sight distance. Where screening is prohibited by the above provisions, low lying shrubs or other similar plantings shall be placed; such plantings shall not be allowed to exceed three feet in height. (ii) Screening shall not be installed in such a manner as to obstruct the free use of any fire hydrant. (iii)The space between the landscaping screen and the right-of-way, except for any pedestrian access improvements, shall be landscaped with grass, shrubs, trees, or evergreen groundcover. On the sides and rear of parking areas not facing a street, such landscaping shall be required between screening and the lot line. (7) Landscape Plan. When screening is required, a landscaping plan shall be submitted with the project application to indicate how the minimum screening requirements are met. The plan must meet the following requirements: (a) The landscape plan shall be drawn on the same base map as the development plans or on a separate sheet properly labeled and shall identify the following: (i) Total landscape area; (ii) Landscape materials, plant names, and applicable size; (iii) Property lines; (iv) Impervious surfaces; (v) Existing or proposed structures, fences, and retaining walls; and V (vi) Natural features or vegetation left in natural state. (b) The required landscaping shall be installed prior to project occupancy. However, a certificate of occupancy may be issued prior to installation of the required landscaping if a bond or other form of appropriate surety is posted in a manner acceptable to the administrator. The time limit for compliance may be extended to allow installation of such required landscaping during the next planting season. (8) Maintenance. (a)All landscaping and necessary support systems shall be maintained for the life of the project. (b)All landscape materials shall be pruned and trimmed as necessary to maintain a healthy growing condition. (c) Landscape areas shall be kept free of trash. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.30.140 Lighting. (1) Exterior Lighting. Exterior lighting shall not exceed 30 feet in height from the finished grade for commercial and industrial uses, and 20 feet for residential uses (except when such lighting is an integral part of the building). Exterior lighting shall be energy-efficient and shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflections are contained within the boundaries of the parcel. Exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights-of-way. No lighting shall blink, flash, or be of unusually high intensity or brightness. All lighting fixtures shall be appropriate in scale, intensity, and height to the use they are serving. Any lighting installed in parking areas shall be of direct cutoff design so that the source is not visible from adjacent property. (2) Street Lighting. Street lighting may be provided by private parties on county roads, provided the design and location shall be approved by the county engineer, and a method to cover the cost of operation and maintenance is approved by the county engineer. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] F � 18.30.100 Parking. (1) General Parking Standards. The following standards shall apply to all development under this code. (a) Off-street parking shall be established prior to occupancy of any new or expanded building or before a change occurs in the use of an existing building. Parking space requirements shall be determined from Table 6-2, and as follows: (i) Off-street parking ratios expressed as the number of spaces per square feet means the usable or net square footage of floor area, exclusive of nonpublic areas, such as building maintenance areas, storage areas, closets, or restrooms. If the formula for determining the number of off-street parking spaces results in a fraction, the number of spaces shall be rounded to the nearest higher whole number; (ii)Where other provisions of this UDC stipulate maximum parking allowed, or increase or reduce minimum parking requirements, those provisions shall apply; (iii)An applicant may request a modification of the minimum number of parking spaces by providing a study prepared by a qualified professional that substantiates that parking demand can be met with a reduced parking requirement. In such cases, the administrator may approve a reduction of the minimum number of spaces required; (iv)The current edition of the International Building Code shall be used to determine the number of occupants of a use; (v) The administrator may refer to the current edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual to determine the number of trips used to determine parking demand and may increase or reduce the required number of parking spaces based on actual usage or projected demand; and (vi) For unnamed uses, the administrator may require a study prepared by a licensed civil engineer that substantiates an acceptable parking requirement. (b) Parking for physically handicapped needs shall be provided consistent with state standards at a rate of not less than two percent of the total number of parking spaces, or a minimum of one parking space, whichever is greater. Single-family residences, including duplexes, are exempt from this requirement. Parking spaces for physically handicapped needs shall comply with ANSI 117.1-2003 (502.2 and 502.4.2). Such spaces shall be not less than 12 feet, six inches wide. (c)A parking layout plan shall be submitted to the administrator for approval consistent with requirements of Table 6-2 for all multifamily residential, commercial, industrial, institutional and small-scale recreation and tourist uses, at the time of application for any permit or land use activity required by this code. The layout plan shall conform to the general parking standards contained in this subsection. The administrator may refer any parking plan to the county engineer for technical review. (d) Required off-street parking located within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program shall also be consistent with applicable provisions of this section. (e) Off-street parking areas containing five or more spaces shall be landscaped according to JCC 18.30.130(6). (f) The minimum parking space and aisle dimensions for the most common parking angles are shown in Table 6-3. For parking angles other than those shown on the chart, the minimum parking space and aisle dimensions shall be approved by the county engineer. (g) Owners of two or more adjoining uses, structures or lots may utilize jointly the same parking or loading area when the hours of operation do not overlap. In the event that owners of one or more adjoining uses, structures or lots desire to utilize jointly the same parking concurrently, the total requirement for parking spaces shall be the sum of the requirements for each individual use, unless the applicants can demonstrate to the administrator that a lower number of parking spaces are justified through implementation of transportation demand management strategies, off-peak use, availability and use of public transit or alternative modes of travel or other measures. (h) If lighting is provided, it shall be designed to minimize direct illumination of abutting properties and adjacent streets. (2) Parking Access Standards. All parking facilities shall be developed consistent with the following access standards: (a) Joint accesses for commercial, industrial and multifamily residential uses should be utilized whenever feasible. (b)All ingress and egress to a parking lot accessing an arterial or collector roadway shall be developed so vehicles entering and leaving the parking lot are headed in a forward motion. (c)Access points shall be located in a manner consistent with the standards of the Jefferson County department of public works or WSDOT, where applicable. (d) Limited access provisions shall be required when deemed necessary by the Jefferson County department of public works or WSDOT,where applicable. (3) General Off-Street Parking Construction Standards. (a) All required off-street parking shall be provided with an all-weather surface as required by the Jefferson County department of public works. (b) Grading work for parking areas shall meet the requirements of the International Building Code. Drainage and erosion or sedimentation control facilities shall be provided in accordance with JCC 18.30.060(2) and 18.30.070. (c) Wheel stops, striping, or similar measures are required where a parked vehicle would encroach on adjacent property, pedestrian access or circulation areas, rights-of-way, or landscaped areas. (d)Any lighting installed in parking areas shall be consistent with the requirements of JCC 18.30.140. Table 6-2. Minimum Number of Parking Spaces Required for Different Land Uses Land Use Minimum Number of Parking Spaces Required()) COMMERCIAL USES Animal shelters, commercial 1 per 750 square feet plus 1 per employee kennels and catteries Automotive service and repair 2 spaces per bay or stall plus 1 space per employee Table 6-2. Minimum Number of Parking Spaces Required for Different Land Uses Land Use Minimum Number of Parking Spaces Required» Bed and breakfast inn or residence 1 per guest room, plus 2 per facility Day care, group care, and 1 space per 10 people enrolled plus 1 for each staff member or volunteer residential care facilities on-site, but not fewer than 3 spaces Drinking and/or eating 1 per 100 square feet or 1 per 3 seats, whichever is greater. Seasonal establishments outside seating does not require additional parking Hotel/motel 1 per guest room plus 1 per employee Indoor entertainment facilities 1 per 4 seats or per 100 square feet of assembly area, whichever is greater Nursing homes/assisted living 5 plus 1 per 6 beds facilities Personal and professional services 1 space per 300 square feet plus 1 per employee, but not fewer than 3 and offices spaces Retail sales and services 1 per 300 square feet Unnamed commercial uses [Determined by the administrator] Industrial Uses For all industrial uses (except as 1 per employee plus 1 per 300 square feet of any associated retail sales listed below) area Heavy equipment rental services 1 per 750 square feet plus 1 per employee Recycling center 1 per 750 square feet plus 1 per employee Solid waste handling facilities 1 per 750 square feet plus 1 per employee INSTITUTIONAL USES College or technical school/adult 1 per classroom, plus 1 per 2 students education facility Community club or community 1 space per 300 square feet but not fewer than 5 spaces organization facility Emergency services [Determined by the administrator] Table 6-2. Minimum Number of Parking Spaces Required for Different Land Uses Land Use Minimum Number of Parking Spaces Required") Government offices 1 space per 300 square feet but not fewer than 5 spaces Library 1 per 300 square feet Museum 1 per 800 square feet Post office 1 space per 300 square feet but not fewer than 5 spaces Religious assembly facility 1 per 5 fixed seats, plus 1 per 50 square feet of gross floor area without fixed seats used for assembly purposes School, primary and secondary 1 per 10 students enrolled plus 1 per employee Unnamed institutional uses [Determined by the administrator] SMALL-SCALE RECREATIONAL AND TOURIST USES For all small-scale recreational and [Determined by the administrator] tourist uses Unnamed small-scale recreational [Determined by the administrator] and tourist uses RESIDENTIAL USES Cottage industry 1 per 2 employees Group homes 1.5 per tenant Home business 2 per dwelling unit for each home business Mobile home parks 2 per dwelling unit Multifamily residential (3+units) 1.5 per dwelling unit Single-family residential unit 2 per dwelling unit Two-family residential (duplex) 2 per dwelling unit Unnamed residential uses [Determined by the administrator] TRANSPORTATION USES All transportation-related uses [Determined by the administrator] Table 6-2. Minimum Number of Parking Spaces Required for Different Land Uses Land Use Minimum Number of Parking Spaces Require& UTILITIES USES All utilities and related uses [Determined by the administrator] AGRICULTURAL USES Agricultural activities None Accessory uses Parking fully accommodated on-site, unless otherwise permitted Forest products, processing 1 per employee activities Nurseries 1 per employee Unnamed agricultural uses [Determined by the administrator] Note: 1.At least one parking space must be provided, unless indicated by"None." 4111, 1SS a C t +. 41 F • Table 6-3. Minimum Dimensions for Parking Stalls and Aisles Parking Stall Curb Stall Aisle Width (E) Unit Depth (F) Angle (A) Width (B) Length (C) Depth (D) 1-Way 2-Way 1-Way 2-Way 0 9.0 22.5 9.0 12.0 20.0 30.0 38.0 45 9.0 12.5 17.5 14.0 20.0 49.0 55.0 60 9.0 10.5 18.0 18.0 20.0 54.0 56.0 90 9.0 9.0 18.0 23.0 26.0 59.0 62.0 [Ord. 8-06§ 1] c 18.40.530 Approval criteria for all conditional uses. (1)The county may approve or approve with modifications an application for a conditional use permit (i.e., uses listed in Table 3-1 in JCC 18.15.040 as"C(a)," "C(d)" or"C") if all of the following criteria are satisfied: (a)The conditional use is harmonious and appropriate in design, character and appearance with the existing or intended character and quality of development in the vicinity of the subject property and with the physical characteristics of the subject property; (b)The conditional use will be served by adequate infrastructure including roads,fire protection, water, wastewater disposal, and stormwater control; (c)The conditional use will not be materially detrimental to uses or property in the vicinity of the subject parcel; (d) The conditional use will not introduce noise, smoke, dust, fumes, vibrations, odors, or other conditions or which unreasonably impact existing uses in the vicinity of the subject parcel; (e)The location, size, and height of buildings, structures,walls and fences, and screening vegetation for the conditional use will not unreasonably interfere with allowable development or use of neighboring properties; (f) The pedestrian and vehicular traffic associated with the conditional use will not be hazardous to existing and anticipated traffic in the vicinity of the subject parcel; (g)The conditional use complies with all other applicable criteria and standards of this code and any other applicable local, state or federal law; and more specifically, conforms to the standards contained in Chapters 18.20 and 18.30 JCC; (h)The proposed conditional use will not result in the siting of an incompatible use adjacent to an airport or airfield; (i)The conditional use will not cause significant adverse impacts on the human or natural environments that cannot be mitigated through conditions of approval; (j) The conditional use has merit and value for the community as a whole; I (k)The conditional use is consistent with all relevant goals and policies of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan; and (I)The public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effect. Consideration shall be given to the cumulative effect of similar actions in the area. (2) In instances where all of the above findings cannot be made, the application shall be denied. (3)The administrator may consider applications for modifications of lawfully established conditional uses and developments approved under this code and conditional uses in existence on December 18, 2000, when the application proposes to bring the existing use substantially closer to compliance with the standards of this code. The administrator may approve, conditionally approve, or deny the modification application.A site plan conforming to the provisions of this chapter and Article II, Project Permit Applications (Type I—IV), of this chapter shall accompany the application showing the location, size and type of modification proposed by the applicant. (4) Modifications may be approved by the administrator under Type I review procedures; provided, that the cumulative modifications of the approved use will not exceed the following limitations: (a)The modification will not increase residential use by more than one unit, if allowed by the land use district; (b)The modification will not increase the required amount of parking by more than 20 percent or 20 spaces (whichever is less); (c)The proposed modification will not expand the total square footage of all structures and/or outdoor use areas, excluding parking, by more than 20 percent. In addition, the proposed expansion of the structure shall not result in total size of the structure exceeding the maximum building size limits in Chapter 18,30 JCC; (d)The modification will not change or modify any special condition imposed under any previous official review; (e)The modification will not significantly reduce the amount or location of required site screening; (f) The modification will not expand an existing nonconforming use or structure, or render a conforming use or structure nonconforming; (g)The modification will not establish a new use; (h)The modification will not expand a mining/site operation, mineral processing or mineral batching activity; (i) In the determination of the administrator, the modification will not create or materially increase any adverse impacts or undesirable effects of the project, or cause the use or structure to become inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan or the purpose of the land use class and district. (5)All proposed uses, structures and site improvements (and modifications thereof) shall comply with the development standards of this code. (6)Any proposed modification that does not meet all the requirements of this subsection shall not be approved through this process, but shall be reviewed through the current review procedures as outlined by this chapter. (7) Decisions to administratively approve modifications shall be administered through a consistency review of development permits in accordance with this code and any previous conditions of approval. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.40.540 Additional conditions. The county may impose additional conditions on a particular use if it is deemed necessary for the protection of the surrounding properties, the neighborhood, or the general welfare of the public. The conditions may: (1) Increase requirements in the standards, criteria or policies established by this code; (2) Stipulate an exact location for the conditional use on the subject property as a means of minimizing hazards to life, limb, property damage, erosion, landslides or traffic; (3) Require structural features or equipment as a means of minimizing hazards to life, limb, property damage, erosion, landslides or traffic; or (4) Contain restrictions or provisions deemed necessary to establish parity with uses permitted in the same zone with respect to avoiding nuisance generating features in matters of noise, odors, air pollution, wastes, vibration, traffic and physical hazards. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] A 18.40.550 Use of property before final decision. No building permit shall be issued for any use involved in an application for approval for a conditional use permit until the conditional use permit is approved and becomes effective. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.40.560 Effective period — Expiration. (1)A conditional use permit automatically expires and becomes void if the applicant fails to file for a building permit or other necessary development permit within three years of the effective date (the date of the decision granting the permit) of the permit unless the permit approval provides for a greater period of time. (2) Extensions to the duration of the original permit approval are prohibited. (3)The department of community development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of an impending expiration. [Ord. 8-06§ 1] 18.40.570 Modification of a conditional use permit. The county may modify an approved conditional use permit as follows:the county may delete, modify or impose additional conditions upon finding that the use for which the approval was granted has been intensified, changed or modified by the property owner or by person(s)who control the property without approval so as to significantly impact surrounding land uses. A modification will be processed as a Type II land use decision pursuant to JCC 18.40.270. [Ord. 8-06§ 1] 18.40.580 Conditional use permit to run with the land. A conditional use permit granted under this article shall continue to be valid upon a change of ownership of the site, business, service, use or structure that was the subject of the permit application. No other use is allowed without approval of an additional conditional use permit. [Ord. 8-06§ 1] 18.40.590 Permit suspension or revocation. The county may suspend or revoke an approved conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 18.50 JCC upon finding that: (1)The use for which the approval was granted has been abandoned for a period of at least one year; (2)Approval of the permit was obtained by misrepresentation of material fact; or (3)The permit is being exercised contrary to the terms of approval. [Ord. 8-06§ 1] e'�sON co JEFFERSON COUNTY 0- DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web: www.co.iefferson.wa.uslcommunitydevelopment LqS, t NG,s0+ Tel: 360.379.4450 I Fax: 360.379.4451 I Email:dcd a(�,co.jefferson,wa.us Building Permits 8 Inspections I Development Consistency Review i Long Range Planning I Watershed Stewardship Resource Center Pre-Application Conference The Jefferson County Code (JCC) requires that before an application is made for all Type II and Type Ill project applications and Type I applications proposing impervious surfaces of ten thousand (10,000) square feet or more and/or non-single family structures of five thousand (5,000) square feet or more, a pre-application consultation must be held. The consultation includes preliminary review and administrative assistance. This service does not include extensive field inspection or correspondence. Pre-application consultation does not limit subsequent administrative review. At the conference, Department of Community Development personnel shall provide the applicant with: (1) A list of the requirements for a completed application; (2) A general summary of the procedures to be used to process the application; (3) The references to relevant code provisions or development standards that may apply to the approval of the application; and (4) A list of any applicable hourly review fees that may be charged by one or more County agencies upon the filing of a project permit application with the County. Discussions at the conference or the information provided by the staff shall not bind or prohibit the County's future application or enforcement of all applicable laws and regulations. No statements or assurances made by County representatives shall in any way relieve the applicant of his or her duty to submit an application consistent with all relevant requirements of County, state and federal codes, laws, regulations and land use plans. Bill Staples / Dream City, LLC NAME: MAILING ADDRESS: 1192 57th Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 TELEPHONE: (HOME) 520400-2345 (WORK) REPRESENTATIVE: Simon Little I studioSTL, Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: 210 N. Victory Avenue, Port Townsend, WA 98368 TELEPHONE:(HOME) 360-640-8814 (WORK) DIRECTIONS A. , ; 3 T 1. Please answer all questions on this form completely. 2. Attach a sketch of the Conceptual Design for the proposed use or activity, showing the following information: a. Vicinity sketch; t b. North arrow and scale; /� c. Property boundaries and identification of land uses on adjacent properties; _ , ,,77:` V E n d. Means of ingress and egress; I , e. Property/lot drainage; I �� ,I f. Possible locations of sewage disposal and water supply systems; �C14 I g. Location of utility easements; and 4FP 1 �� h. Proposed location of buildings, including setbacks to property boundaries. 3. Attach payment of the applicable fee,as set forth in the Jefferson County Fee Ordinance. I J ;-'ka 1i,-,uu, Aet;#. I51S.3 .4-1.. I4- — .. .- _ Rice;` 1515 4, c!� 1 0 7 — ± t Property Description General Location: One mile South of the City Limits. Turn West off of SR-20 onto W. Fredricks Street. The property is located two tenths of a mile from the intersection. It is on the North side of W. Fredricks Street. Legal Description (from Property Tax Statement): EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13, LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN VAC ALLEY, SOPHIA ST, & SNAC ELWOOD ST ADJ 9-Digit Parcel Number(from Property Tax Statement): 948601301 Total Acreage: 1 .8 Zone: LI % Lot Coverage: 43 Applicant: ❑ Owner D Lessee 8 Contract Purchaser ❑ Other Project Description We are proposing to build three agriculture structures. Two structures will handle interior growing operations and will be pre-engineered metal buildings of a Type IIB construction. The third structure will consist of seven gutter-connected greenhouses, categorized as temporary building structures. The existing septic system is planned to support the minimal employees. The site has an existing PUD water and power service. Property Owner(name and mailing address): Bill Staples / Dream City, LLC 1192 57th Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 Standard Disclosure Information provided to a prospective applicant during the pre-application consultation is based on County regulations in effect at the time of the pre-application consultation. Revised or new County regulations could affect a future development application. A pre- application consultation does not vest a future development application. By signing the application form,the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities, judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees, representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. This right of entry shall expire when the County (through the Administrator or the Administrator's representatives) concludes the application has complied with all applicable laws and regulations. Access and right of entry to the applicant's property shall be requested and shall occur only during regular business hours. (SIGNATURE) (DATE) I hereby designate Simon Little to act as my agent in matters related to this pre-application conference. 09-18-14 l -4 a ,E II V (LANDOW ER SIGNATURE) (DATE) --= QEP 1 3 2014 i 2) 'JEFFERSON COUNTY L, DEPT OF CEJ:TAF:U1'+;IiY UHF! IMM'''. G;Per,lCenterW FORMSNA#1DRD1Current DRD Forms pre-app conference form_FINAL.doc REV.11/1/2013 Pace 2 I ADJACENT LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL N — — — — - - _ - - - •, ... — _ — _ _ � PROPERTY LINE 0 mXi ti 1,11 _; m paw P8W b , r _ �_ SIDE YARD SETBACK �N r O m _ r r'` r'''!t�J,rr tri r ';� I J� I 1 ZNz ✓' ✓r �r ' 1 /� I o ✓' ✓' rn N L o `''' /" ,✓✓ %s✓✓ „. q, oA d �' O w:": rn i N z M lP , rn n r N 1 V r m Z (� 0 ✓ k z a G� - C / D I y ,,, � A � � ON � Nr � 1 i � N N I I rn I �� � 0 rnrn uzi00 � � A 1 xo I I IllII iy � ' � 1 j� _ z z _ _ ( � I 6 r✓' rr r' rr 0 y Z 0ICI V / / i ,• VH K, ,r' LJ 1min< I -' r Ilimmm / I ' ✓ 'r /� '', 2 A / '✓r ✓" ,, rr,./' r'r r'r r I 1 r ✓ /' ., ,,. , 7,13 ztil M �1 rn3 ✓'r'rr , '� r 11 I,,, b✓ , ' ,'' ,,,' ,r ,, , r✓.. . '{ rn ..._ I 2 r ' .,„„ ,rr „/ r ,r✓/ ,r' ,✓ ,'''' ,✓. , „..., ,', V /� d ✓ -1 ✓` r ,7'''' ;r`' � r ' ,✓' ,, �✓, 7"---3,,,''-'4-,e' �r ,, ✓ , -�-,,— �_ 7''''Z' rn Z m CII ✓ / r ✓ / I rn A Z / r,r ✓ ✓ r"r I rn in rn „r r ✓ ''r ✓ r ✓-{ ,r ,✓ r ✓ ,, mI r -,r C f ,r', r ,, .,'✓ rrrZ , I ZDI ,rL ✓ 1 k /� ✓, ',,, r✓''r ', r ✓ �✓ T ✓ r,r '✓ .--/'�6 d a✓ ✓I r H ✓ ✓ r` ✓ ✓ ,. -1 I ill o I ✓ ✓ "n r' `'' -�,:r ,�✓, _",, rte' 'r r r 0 r �, ✓ ,r✓ ✓, ,r ,,r ✓; r, ✓., r,, ,, ,r,✓ , ,, ✓ ;'� .r'' ,,'r / r✓'r ,,r'✓ /' s,rr ,r''r '✓ ,I I V1 I , � , ,,'✓ ,,,✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ , r r 1 L_ — o SIDE YARD SETBACK I ti E .(015...._ - - b - - - - - - - - - - - - I PROPERTY LINE i, 4 1 ADJACENT LAND USE: VACATED STREET NO N o ------------------------ ED Z 70 m �_ CJ C C N �_ AN qo 0o d rn r, 2 a c. is Wl cn 11 SR 20 V .lay ilgmP cn 8 D DREAM CITY, LLC a R i o co A •• 192 W. FREDRICKS STREET 1 1? PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 2 r r F lj ADJACENT LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL it) PROPERTY LINE _ .... - I \ - - --- - --- i) 1I1 , - - __ „ rFlIAI— --- ___ . k _ _ ':,. I - ------ SIDE YAW SETBACK 0 < I r \ -I . — __,_:___:. _P > .,..., .„. ..,„.. „.„, , ,, , , .... , I 1 — - - [Ti Z , ' ,,•, . ,,,-'' niq\ 's .,' ..,' .,'"1 ,,' ' ,,,,,-- ,..,,,,---„,--'„,-- UV 9> > ,,' 1 - H 1 I m =1 , ..,,,,c , .„- ,.,.., „i I- --- -.-- 1 ,- „• q\ 0 x !.... ....., ,„... ,.. -- __--- 0 ,.:-._--->---2-_-----.-.:„, , I , _ _„.., „.„ ....„ „. ;3 i 1 1 79 p i i .7 ,, ...r .....4' ,,,,,,, .-. ?:, @ - ...,.- .,.. ,...., 1J CT / I -13 J. I 5; CP l H 11 '''' ''''''',,A7 Itt ;<' "I 'Si ""a ........ ,,,,,,,, _ 0 0 (1) N r 1 - •-5:---5:- ,, , cz I ill A I z < 1 x 0 1 -n z rn QN 1 I G A m 1 I t:13 -I I rn D i . ' (S) 111 i A ' I n A -ON 1:13 RI to ..., A , ...,.. -II -" -- ...."„..- 1 I Z ›. .-' .... 7C L I , 1 --‹ , . i 0 1 [ I •144. , u) I , 1 , -- ,..,- •- z --' ,,, 0 .,,,- ,- --1 , 6 r-- > r- Ill .6: 'xi z 1T1 ...0 1.1 I . 0 0 ' „.,- ,„..- ,...-77.-- --;„.--- ,„,'''__7,,,..-____..,,-,.. . ._,,,L..- __,,,-' ,,r_.,- ,z,i,'___.,,,I. A 0 • 1 I c H 0 01 ,,,,,,,„.,...7_ „,,„ ..., 1 . „, ,,„ .., „, ,... ,,, ., ,..., „,,, ..., ,,,, ,: _< ..... ..., ........ ..,,, „,. .1 > ln I I c6P „,--- „..,- ,,,,,-' ,,,,,” ,„,-. ,„ ,„ IJ r- in 311 ,..- ,,,,,,-,,„.,---,,...-- ,, , - - --„,--z-„-.--,z"--,.----"--,-- --,.,--,..-:f_ „._L-"__,-i___,-'' .•-''' ,..,--'_,----" I.-' 0 im rn 7, Til I rn in I 1 .,"' -''' ,,'"''' ,•'''' - I -13 rn I z i > I i I I 1 1 I „ , -„ I •' ' ' ' 9 13, ..., -ri II .., .....- .., k.1.1. I I o SIDE YARD SETBACK I - - -_ - - - - - - -- - - --- - - --_ - - - - - I F'ROFERTY LINE ADJACENT LAND USE: VACATED S - - TREET 4 ...._. .43 N., , 1 . AD c) m , I -0 ffl M F < . 7-1 C:, '11 CO 0 r — -1-1 P c‘ cp -ot -1:3 iO ?CI z /i '" , , ,., lifil n H ...._ ui i X u 7J Kei, cl, 2 co cc=3 7C 4 Jr V) 0 zi -A. 6 -0 ffi (r) 1 71 (51 1 1-4 m> - ------- li ,, SR 20 1111! U.?5u.11 E _ 3 > DREAM CITY, LLC qIi! giLgri 1111§ !DIP, 0 4 V), -.3. 192 W. FREDRICKS STREET cc; 1 a PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 (sVON c,G JEFFERSON COUNTY I DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,WA 98368 I Web: www.co.iefferson.wa.uslcommunitydevelopment q` ss Tel:360.379.4450 I Fax: 360.379.4451 I Email:dcdna,co.iefferson.wa.us Building Permits&Inspections I Development Consistency Review i Long Range Planning i Watershed Stewardship Resource Center Pre-Application Conference The Jefferson County Code (JCC) requires that before an application is made for all Type II and Type Ill project applications and Type I applications proposing impervious surfaces of ten thousand (10,000) square feet or more and/or non-single family structures of five thousand (5,000) square feet or more, a pre-application consultation must be held. The consultation includes preliminary review and administrative assistance. This service does not include extensive field inspection or correspondence. Pre-application consultation does not limit subsequent administrative review. At the conference, Department of Community Development personnel shall provide the applicant with: (1) A list of the requirements for a completed application; (2) A general summary of the procedures to be used to process the application; (3) The references to relevant code provisions or development standards that may apply to the approval of the application; and (4) A list of any applicable hourly review fees that may be charged by one or more County agencies upon the filing of a project permit application with the County. Discussions at the conference or the information provided by the staff shall not bind or prohibit the County's future application or enforcement of all applicable laws and regulations. No statements or assurances made by County representatives shall in any way relieve the applicant of his or her duty to submit an application consistent with all relevant requirements of County, state and federal codes, laws, regulations and land use plans. Bill Staples / Dream City, LLC NAME: MA�LINGADDRESS: 1192 57th Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 TELEPHONE:(HOME) 520-400-2345 (WORK) REPRESENTATIVE: Simon Little I studioSTL, Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: 210 N. Victory Avenue, Port Townsend, WA 98368 TELEPHONE: (HOME) 360-640-8814 (WORK) ''''''.1'"W it 4 b 1. Please answer all questions on this form completely. 2. Attach a sketch of the Conceptual Design for the proposed use or activity, showing the following information: a. Vicinity sketch; b. North arrow and scale; _ n/] c. Property boundaries and identification of land uses on adjacent properties; — V d. Means of ingress and egress; ` ' `` '� J y —tel e. Property/lot drainage; ! '•L. I' � �i f. Possible locations of sewage disposal and water supply systems; 1 ^. '` g. Location of utility easements; and \ h. Proposed location of buildings, including setbacks to property boundaries. I -____- j 3. Attach payment of the applicable fee, as set forth in the Jefferson County Fee Ordinance. I j ornl f 117h,,i MT _ &A off 015is4,3 ck '/U 14- — Pie-� Payee,Xl 5) 5 4 y in ? - EI-I 'fee Property Description General Location: One mile South of the City Limits. Turn West off of SR-20 onto W. Fredricks Street. The property is located two tenths of a mile from the intersection. It is on the North side of W. Fredricks Street. Legal Description (from Property Tax Statement): EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13, LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PIN VAC ALLEY, SOPHIA ST, & SNAC ELWOOD ST ADJ 9-Digit Parcel Number(from Property Tax Statement): 948601301 Total Acreage: 1 .8 Zone: LI % Lot Coverage: 43 Applicant: ❑ Owner ❑ Lessee IR Contract Purchaser ❑ Other Project Description We are proposing to build three agriculture structures. Two structures will handle interior growing operations and will be pre-engineered metal buildings of a Type IIB construction. The third structure will consist of seven gutter-connected greenhouses, categorized as temporary building structures. The existing septic system is planned to support the minimal employees. The site has an existing PUD water and power service. Property Owner(name and mailing address): Bill Staples / Dream City, LLC 1192 57th Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 Standard Disclosure Information provided to a prospective applicant during the pre-application consultation is based on County regulations in effect at the time of the pre-application consultation. Revised or new County regulations could affect a future development application. A pre- application consultation does not vest a future development application. By signing the application form,the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save, indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities, judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees, representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any required later inspections. This right of entry shall expire when the County (through the Administrator or the Administrator's representatives) concludes the application has complied with all applicable laws and regulations. Access and right of entry to the applicant's property shall be requested and shall occur only during regular business hours. (SIGNATURE) (DATE) I hereby designate Simon Little to act as my agent in matters related to this pre-application conference. s 09-18-14 r•--, '� s I (LANDOWER SIGNATURE)RE (DATE) t - I Li ii 1 I, crp 1 3 2014 LJ l JEiFERSON COUNTY L.. OTT OF CC':',I,.i\tY DEVELOPMENT Gvermitcenterwth#FORms4w DRDlcurrent ORD Forms pre-app conference form_FINAL.doc REV.11/112013 Paae 2 CASES, FINDING, CONDITIONS, PERMISSIONS FOR MLA02-00517 Printed: October 14, 2014 Cases Review Type Status Planner BLD02-00573 I F S HOSKINS 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on October 7, 2002 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area and Special Aquifer Protection Area. 2.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contair sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 3.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration c recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 4.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas are defined as Seawater Intrusion Areas, and Special Aquifer Recharge Protection Areas and the following land uses located within Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas (1)All Industrial Land Uses (2) All Commercial Uses (3)All Rural Residential Land Uses requiring a Discretionary Use or Conditional Use Permit(4) All Rural Residential Land Uses with nonconforming uses that would otherwise require a Discretionary Use or Conditional Use Permit(5) Unsewered Planned Rural Residential Developments (6) Unsewered residential development with gross densities greater than one unit per acre. All of the above listed uses shall be subject to the applicable requirements and standards of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. 5.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the projec shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs) and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. 6.) The applicant is proposing to create or add 3,168 square feet of impervious surface and no land disturbing activities. This parcel is mapped in a Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area and Special Aquifer Protection Area. Sections 6.6 and 6.7 of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code requires that your proposal submit a Small Parcel Erosion anc Sediment Control Plan. 7.) A Small Parcel Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has been submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisiom of the submitted plan and contact the Jefferson County Department of Community Development to arrange a schedule to inspect the property for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Department verifies plan compliance. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 8.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i). 9.) Maximum lot coverage is not to exceed 25%. 10.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 11.) Minimum setback from W Frederick St is 20 feet. Minimum setback from Louisa St is 20 feet. Minimum setback fror the northwest portion of the parcel adjacent to right-of-way (Sophia St) is 20 feet. Minimum side and rear setbacks are 5 feet. 12.) Call Jefferson County Permit Center, Development Review Division for inspection of erosion control measures. (360: 379-4463 13.) This parcel is a legal nonconforming lot designated as Rural Residential 1: 5 under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 14.) This parcel was created through the Eisenbeis Bay View subdivision April 4, 1890 and recorded under Vol 2, pg 54 of Long Plats. 15.) W Frederick St (C693519) is a county local access road. A road approach permit(RAP02-00038) was issued March 8, 2002. An address of 192 W Frederick St has been assigned to the parcel. 16.) A Declaration of Restrictive Covenant was recorded June 21, 2002 underAFN 457130 to allow development over lot lines. 17.) A septic permit (SEP02-00111)was issued June 21, 2002 for a system with capacity of 240 gallons per day. 18.) The revised site plan as submitted with the building application on October 8, 2002 has been reviewed for consistenc under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated October 18, 2002 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 19.) This approval is for a garage/storage building and carport only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_MLA_Conditions.rpt 10/14/2014 BLD02-00574 I F S HOSKINS 1.) The application was reviewed by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development staff on October 7, 2002 for the potential presence of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) under the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC). After an initial Geographic Information Systems mapping review and an investigative site inspection, the following ESAs were confirmed to be present on the subject property: Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area and Special Aquifer Protection Area. 2.) Aquifer Recharge Areas in Jefferson County are characterized by porous geological formations that allow percolation of the surface water into the soils and the underlying zone of saturation. Aquifers are geologic formations that contair sufficient saturated permeable material to yield significant quantities of water to wells and springs. Aquifers serve as the source of drinking water within most of the rural portions of Jefferson County. 3.) Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration c recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. 4.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas are defined as Seawater Intrusion Areas, and Special Aquifer Recharge Protection Areas and the following land uses located within Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Areas (1)All Industrial Land Uses (2) All Commercial Uses (3)All Rural Residential Land Uses requiring a Discretionary Use or Conditional Use Permit(4) All Rural Residential Land Uses with nonconforming uses that would otherwise require a Discretionary Use or Conditional Use Permit (5) Unsewered Planned Rural Residential Developments (6) Unsewered residential development with gross densities greater than one unit per acre. All of the above listed uses shall be subject to the applicable requirements and standards of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. 5.) Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas may require special protection measures to mitigate water quality degradation. The submitted proposal does not require additional aquifer protection measures. However, during construction the projec shall follow the Best Management Practices (BMPs) and facility design standards as identified and defined in the Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. 6.) The applicant is proposing to create or add 3,168 square feet of impervious surface and no land disturbing activities. This parcel is mapped in a Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area and Special Aquifer Protection Area. Sections 6.6 and 6.7 of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code requires that your proposal submit a Small Parcel Erosion am Sediment Control Plan. 7.) A Small Parcel Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has been submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provision: of the submitted plan and contact the Jefferson County Department of Community Development to arrange a schedule to inspect the property for plan compliance. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Department verifies plan compliance. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 8.) Jefferson County determined that this proposal is categorically exempt from review under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)0). 9.) Maximum lot coverage is not to exceed 25%. 10.) The building height is not to exceed 35 feet. 11.) Minimum setback from W Frederick St is 20 feet. Minimum setback from Louisa St is 20 feet. Minimum setback fror the northwest portion of the parcel adjacent to right-of-way (Sophia St) is 20 feet. Minimum side and rear setbacks are 5 feet. 12.) Call Jefferson County Permit Center, Development Review Division for inspection of erosion control measures. (360; 379-4463 13.) This parcel is a legal nonconforming lot designated as Rural Residential 1: 5 under the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map effective August 28, 1998. 14.) This parcel was created through the Eisenbeis Bay View subdivision April 4, 1890 and recorded under Vol 2, pg 54 of Long Plats. 15.) W Frederick St (C693519) is a county local access road. A road approach permit (RAP02-00038)was issued March 8, 2002. An address of 192 W Frederick St has been assigned to the parcel. 16.) A Declaration of Restrictive Covenant was recorded June 21, 2002 underAFN 457130 to allow development over lot lines. 17.) A septic permit (SEP02-00111)was issued June 21, 2002 for a system with capacity of 240 gallons per day. 18.) The revised site plan as submitted with the building application on October 8, 2002 has been reviewed for consistenc under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated October 18, 2002 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 19.) This approval is for a garage/storage building and carport only. Any future permits on this site are subject to review for consistency with applicable codes and ordinances and does not preclude review and conditions which may be placed on future permits. PRJ02-00159 P No findings, conditions, or permissions found. \\tidemark\data\forms\R_MLT_MLA_Conditions.rpt 10/14/2014 a . . 1 l )• PJAGENT LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL —U — — — - - - - - - - - - - - - F - j PROPERTY LINE 0 /" I N _ �yy -P4W b I .� 1 �1 I - -- T-"-VV---- -n() g ( E YARD SETBACK A � � 1 A I mz ,r' ! r� < 0 < N -' - "- ii 7 / 1 I > V' Orn / ", v A - :"- /\ Y (7 rn �y� 1 J 73 lby� % m O OIANNOO I 1 1 y z I 1 1 1 F 1 -i "f0 � G1 ' r tPArn �1 II � 13m 1 rn0 �b�� � � � � � ZIT z f ta 1 Fri? A , 6 n r dz 1 , 0 tea' �� m � � � o a�� rn ,c ' I -I { 7r :r y '6 N / i Li I ...< 0 I ,,, ,/, ,,, , r 11 -' '' ,.-' „,-" ,,,--"- ' i_ ni „, „, O _i ,„,1_, ,, �% „,,' //fes ,..„.. _ (11 a ,� Y ! - ..,„,%„, , -a 9 -� A A r ! Trn f „,i1,,,,,,,,,,-':,,,,„,--",,,,,,,,,-- ! ! r,r r� r A 0 f III Iz ,''� ,„,, r,,, r' hi // ,✓''” ✓" ,,,''/ /°� „,,,,,,2„„,'/r,✓' /'"',,r,..1 77> 4 '” ,r/ ,f�r �< ! �� /' r'` ! ��" r" I V ,--"1„,„' %�!r ✓ � `� - --- -,^'� ..__,,„z-z__„„! ;' „.„--,..„...,L,'�/ N in �'! ✓!!��•r� O -'� O �l��� ! r,,r' r,, ,, r // r,. Ill rn I A z ul ,,,' ! ,•''" r / r ! ! A I rn rn rnI CI 1 Al ! ,,''' ,r'rr / , r �� / I (P r J s �. ,, 7 -,!,f ,r' ! 1 r ! -10 /io-0 ! '" ..d �. !`rte - r .,% � ' .� ;"� MIN " ,! ✓' ✓rr ✓,r �, ✓�' ,,.✓ l ,r' �!1 I _[l7, r r' / ��, f U Cp 'r = ' ,, _g/am !r. r, ''„' s^ y rr ,! r"'r :^,'' ,,,, 1 0> ,✓ 0 ✓'' )3 _- ,!—✓— -,., r ✓ „,-- . �,,! ' � V ;' ! ! ! ! m0I ' ,,.� ,✓'r ,✓'' ,/ r / ,/ ,r' ! ,,,.rte ,--'' ,----- ,�'` ,,,1 C �_ I ,✓ /'r r .r' ✓ ,r ,//f 1 ,r �r' r I I 'r ''✓ -- SIDE ! r” ' o - - 51DE YARD SETBACK - - - - - - I - - b 1 PROPERTY LINE r _It _ 7: I .474").41\Q ADJACENT LAND USE: VACATED STREET S , _. ®Z 1 I4 No ,) ___ 1 T o rn " T m 0 T4-1 -o Z m c � — f -, �.4 z z � � XV _ l 1 0 00 0 Tc::,_ A aril c./' 71 1 LC=7.) rn 5R20 nil! ii -, Qm$° V) g D DREAM CITY, LLC . ! 54 'iHEM Q @@ 4m � iil .4 —1 192 W. FREDRICKS STREET• 3 f® Ni -I PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 192 W. Fredericks, P/N 948601301 0481300102 948800201 948600204 e"le.14 '781111t 94.5601201 048601202 symE.0,20a At. 048601301 048601401 14111111.- 11001 94a6312°1 "Irnirrn.1 c-71 - ---- ------ ---- 948601624 048601507 I'"1"nr-11.1 948601701 948601702 048;331600 040600102 120' 8801 040601401 046601301 =1:11 948W L,.)z y4860'201 * —W WWWW1W St 22 101860,504 C=:11. 1 111( 040001 Yet 4 RCW 19.27.065 Exemption — Temporary growing structures used for commercial production of horticultural plants. The provisions of this chapter do not apply to temporary growing structures used solely for the commercial production of horticultural plants including ornamental plants, flowers, vegetables, and fruits. A temporary growing structure is not considered a building for purposes of this chapter. [1996c157 § 2.] Notes: Effective date -- 1996 c 157: See note following RCW 19.27.015. RCW 19.27.015 Definitions. As used in this chapter: (1) "Agricultural structure" means a structure designed and constructed to house farm implements, hay, grain, poultry, livestock, or other horticultural products. This structure may not be a place of human habitation or a place of employment where agricultural products are processed, treated, or packaged, nor may it be a place used by the public; (2) "City" means a city or town; (3) "Multifamily residential building" means common wall residential buildings that consist of four or fewer units, that do not exceed two stories in height, that are less than five thousand square feet in area, and that have a one-hour fire-resistive occupancy separation between units; and (4) "Temporary growing structure" means a structure that has the sides and roof covered with polyethylene, polyvinyl, or similar flexible synthetic material and is used to provide plants with either frost protection or increased heat retention. [2009 c 362 § 2; 1996 c 157 § 1; 1985 c 360 § 1.] PRE14-00021 Pre-Application Conference Department of Community Development Bill Staples/Simon Little: Marijuana Production & Processing County Attendees: Eric Kuzma, PW; Frank Benskin, BLD; Tom Aumock, Fire Consultant;Joel Peterson, DRD Time&Date: October 15, 2014, 10:00-11:00 a.m. Owner/Applicant: Bill Staples, Dream City LLC Agent: Simon Little, STL Studios Location: 192 W. Fredericks Street, Port Townsend, Parcel #948601301 Description of Proposal: The proposal is a Tier 3 marijuana production facility that includes two new 7,000 square foot buildings for indoor grow area; seven new 3,120 square foot greenhouse structures attached for a total footprint of 21,840 s.f.; an existing shop with plumbing, and existing carport. Note: Application to the State Liquor Control Board also seeks a license for marijuana processing privileges at this location, but processing is not part of the Pre-Application Conference materials provided by the prospective applicant. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT—Eric Kuzma ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT—Handout from Susan Porto BUILDING DIVISION, DCD—Frank Benskin FIRE CODE REVIEW—Tom Aumock DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION, DCD—Joel Peterson • Zoning: Light Industrial (LI); adjacent to LI on the east side, LI/Commercial on the south side, and Residential 1:5 on north and west sides. Allowed Use • Chapter 18.15 JCC,Table 3-1: Agriculture, see 18.20.030: Agriculture is an allowed use in all zones. • Moratorium by Ordinance No. 07-0811-14: Does not affect this location in Light Industrial Zone • Subject to State License requirements of RCW 69.50.325—Proposal is not found within a 1000- foot restriction area. Performance and Use-Specific Standards • 18.20.030 (2)(b)(vii)(G)—Temporary Growing Structures defined at RCW 19.27.015 • 18.20.160 Conversions of land to non-forestry use—Forest Practices. Class IV General Permit from Department of Natural Resources, with SEPA review and Stormwater management review by Jefferson County(18.30.070). Contact Ross Goodwin, Forest Practice Forester, Olympic Region,Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR), 360-460-0900, ross.goodwin@dnr.wa.gov. • 18.40.750 SEPA(State Environmental Protection Act)–Required for combined structures >12,000 square feet floor area; clearing/grading over 500 cubic yards of material. Submit Environmental Checklist for SEPA review. Development Standards • 18.30.050 Setback requirements in Light Industrial: 25-foot setback for property lines adjacent to Residential; 20-foot setback from Fredericks Street; 10-foot setback from LI parcel to east. 10-foot interior setback. • Stormwater Minimum Requirements#1 through #10. > 5000 s.f. impervious surface • 18.30.020(5) General Development Standards--Transportation. Applicant shall be required to provide necessary improvements if transportation facilities are not adequate. • Chapter 18.30 JCC–Development Standards: 1. Max. area Impervious Surface in LI: 55%. Proposal currently at 50%. 2. 18.30.050,Table 6-1, Note 18: Glen Cove Light Industrial District allowances with CUP (Type III) 3. Max. building size: 10,000 s.f. Can go up to 20,000 s.f. with CUP 4. Max. building height: 35ft. Height can go up to 50 ft.with CUP 5. 18.30.130"Screen-A" (15-feet) and "Screen-B" (10-feet) standards apply 6. Fulfill Site Plan Requirements for septic 7. Landscaping Plan, Parking Plan, Lighting& Noise considerations • Existing structure permitted as "Garage/Storage Building" (BLD02-574) and will need Change of Use permit if used as a residence. Mapped Critical Areas:Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area Application Elements& Fees: • Master Land Use Application • Site Plan • Clearing& Grading/Stormwater Management Permit: $380.00 DCD+$600 PW • SEPA Review: $760.00 • Conditional Use Permit (18.40 JCC) –Type III process 18.40.270(Public Notice): $2056.00+ includes the SEPA review($760.00). • Building Permit Applications: fees based on valuation • Demolition Permit, if necessary OTHER REGULATORY/LAND USE CONSIDERATIONS • Washington State Liquor Control Board—All licenses granted by WSLCB must comply with WAC 314-55. • Washington Department of Natural Resources—Forest Practices Application (FPA) • Department of Ecology—water use in Watershed Resource Inventory Area 16 (WRIA 16) • Olympic Region Clean Air Agency (ORCAA)—"Denver's Best Management Practices" as guideline • Governor's Office of Regulatory Innovation and Assistance (ORIA)—Guidance Documents Assurances are unavailable. Discussions at the Pre-Application Conference are not binding,and no statement made by county representatives shall in any way relieve applicant of the duty to submit an application consistent with all relevant regulations and requirements. RCW 19.27.065 Exemption — Temporary growing structures used for commercial production of horticultural plants. The provisions of this chapter do not apply to temporary growing structures used solely for the commercial production of horticultural plants including ornamental plants, flowers, vegetables, and fruits. A temporary growing structure is not considered a building for purposes of this chapter. (1996 c 157 § 2.] Notes: Effective date -- 1996 c 157: See note following RCW 19.27.015. RCW 19.27.015 Definitions. As used in this chapter: (1) "Agricultural structure" means a structure designed and constructed to house farm implements, hay, grain, poultry, livestock, or other horticultural products. This structure may not be a place of human habitation or a place of employment where agricultural products are processed, treated, or packaged, nor may it be a place used by the public; (2) "City" means a city or town; (3) "Multifamily residential building" means common wall residential buildings that consist of four or fewer units, that do not exceed two stories in height, that are less than five thousand square feet in area, and that have a one-hour fire-resistive occupancy separation between units; and (4) "Temporary growing structure" means a structure that has the sides and roof covered with polyethylene, polyvinyl, or similar flexible synthetic material and is used to provide plants with either frost protection or increased heat retention. [2009 c 362 § 2; 1996 c 157 § 1; 1985 c 360 § 1.] Joel Peterson From: Susan Porto Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 10:40 AM To: Joel Peterson Cc: Randy Marx Subject: Declined: Pre-Application Conference PRE14-00021 Joel, I will not be able to attend this meeting. I have asked both randy and linda to see if they are available and neither are. I can meet with the applicant separate from this meeting when I return on or after October 27th. Please give them my phone number and email address with my card and provide them with the following comments. I know a dialog with Randy Marx has already begun regarding the proposal for this site, with a licensed septic designer. The septic system for the site is to be used for toilet, sanitary needs of employees only and it's capacity will be assessed based on number of employees and size of the system (which Randy is already working on). From the pre-application, it appears the intent is to do nothing more than grow marijuana, no processing of the plants is proposed for the extraction of THC or creation of edibles. If that is the case standard procedure to date has been that when a triggering application is received by our office, (building permit, change of use, stormwater application etc),the application is forwarded to EH for review for both septic and water needs for the project. For 1-502 applications: • We requesting a copy of the OPERATION PLAN SUBMTTED TO LIQ CONTROL as a part of their license application. • When received we review the plan against what has been submitted to our department for approval. If there are inconsistencies we need to deal with that. • The OPERATION plan is scanned into an e-mail and forward it to applicable state agencies for their review and comment. • Depending on the comments back, the applicant may be obligated to proceed with other permit processes or not. Again, if they have more questions, have them contact me for an appointment for after I return. Susan SuSaw Porto R.S. Jef fersow Gouvveu PubLi,c. H-eaith Pl'iowe 360. 3859404 FRA 360. 3 .1487 ,4Lwads WorVzi.we fora Safer FteaLthlerief fersow Couwtu� CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message,including any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,use,disclosure,or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT NOTICE: All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCW 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is exempt from disclosure under state law,including RCW 42.56. 1 18.30.130 Landscaping/screening. (1)Application. Landscaping or screening shall be provided for all multifamily residential, commercial and industrial land uses, small-scale recreational and tourist uses, and as required in other sections of this code, except that landscaping will not be required of industrial uses within the resource-based industrial district when the development is sufficiently screened from public view. (2) General Provisions. (a) Existing trees, vegetative plantings, undisturbed open space, and/or topographic or natural features which meet or exceed these standards shall be considered to fulfill the landscaping or screening requirements of this section and any other applicable reference to these screening requirements in other sections of this code. (b)The administrator may authorize variations to the landscaping/screening requirements of this section to: (i) Provide consideration of topography, natural features, existing native vegetation and soils on the site and site location in relation to adjacent and surrounding uses; (ii)Allow alternative plant mixes or berming that accomplish the purposes of the type of landscape screening required; (iii) Conserve water through the concept of xeriscaping; (iv) Provide flexibility in the size of initial plantings; and (v) Ensure that any nonresidential use, structure or activity when proposed in a rural residential (RR) district shall be compatible with that of existing and anticipated future uses in the district. (3) Landscape Screening. The three types of landscaping screens are described and applied as follows. (a) "Screen-A" landscaping: (i) Is a"full screen" that functions as a visual barrier. This landscaping is typically found between residential and nonresidential areas; (ii) Shall at a minimum consist of: (A)A mix of primarily evergreen trees and shrubs generally interspersed to form a continuous year-round screen that grows to at least eight feet in height within two growing seasons. (b) "Screen-B" landscaping: (i) Is a "filtered screen" that functions as a visual separator. This landscaping is typically found between commercial and industrial uses; between differing types of residential development; and to screen industrial uses from the road; (ii) Shall at a minimum consist of: (A)A mix of evergreen and deciduous trees and shrubs generally interspersed to create a filtered screen that grows to at least eight feet in height within two growing seasons. (c) "Screen-C" landscaping: (i) Is a "see-through screen" that functions as a partial visual separator to soften the appearance of parking areas and building elevations. This landscaping is typically found along road frontage or between multiple-family developments; (ii) Shall at a minimum consist of: (A)A mix of evergreen and deciduous trees or shrubs generally interspersed to create a continuous canopy. (4) Landscaping Road Frontages. The average width or depth of perimeter landscaping along road frontages and required locations on private property shall be provided as follows: (a) Ten feet of Screen-B landscaping shall be provided for an industrial development. (b)Ten feet of Screen-B landscaping shall be provided for all above-ground utility facilities or development, excluding distribution and transmission corridors, located outside a public right-of way. (c)Ten feet of Screen-C landscaping shall be provided for all commercial or multiple-family residential development. (5) Landscaping of Interior Lot Lines. The average width or depth of perimeter landscaping along interior lot lines shall be provided as follows: (a) Fifteen feet of Screen-A landscaping shall be included in all commercial, industrial, or small- scale recreational and tourist development along any portion adjacent to a residential use or district, except as may be varied by the administrator under subsection (2)(b) of this section. (b) Ten feet of Screen-B landscaping shall be included in all multiple-family development along any portion adjacent to a single-family residential use and in an industrial development along any portion adjacent to a nonindustrial development, except as provided in subsection (5)(a) of this section. (6) Landscaping for Parking Lots. Landscaping shall be provided for commercial, industrial, small-scale recreational and tourist uses, and multifamily residential use surface parking lots, with five or more parking stalls, as follows: (a) Screening shall be provided on each side, front, and/or rear of a parking lot where such side, front, and/or rear abuts any residential use or district, except that no screening is required where the elevation of the parking area lot line is four feet higher than the finished elevation of the parking area surface. (b) Parking lot screening and landscaping shall be kept in good condition and shall meet the following conditions: (i) It shall be continuous where required along a side, front or rear of a parking area and shall not be less than four feet in height above the grade of the parking lot surface, broken only for accessways and aisles; provided, that the screening shall not be permitted for a distance of 20 feet on each side of a parking area accessway to ensure proper sight distance. Where screening is prohibited by the above provisions, low lying shrubs or other similar plantings shall be placed; such plantings shall not be allowed to exceed three feet in height. (ii) Screening shall not be installed in such a manner as to obstruct the free use of any fire hydrant. (iii)The space between the landscaping screen and the right-of-way, except for any pedestrian access improvements, shall be landscaped with grass, shrubs, trees, or evergreen groundcover. On the sides and rear of parking areas not facing a street, such landscaping shall be required between screening and the lot line. (7) Landscape Plan. When screening is required, a landscaping plan shall be submitted with the project application to indicate how the minimum screening requirements are met. The plan must meet the following requirements: (a) The landscape plan shall be drawn on the same base map as the development plans or on a separate sheet properly labeled and shall identify the following: (i) Total landscape area; (ii) Landscape materials, plant names, and applicable size; (iii) Property lines; (iv) Impervious surfaces; (v) Existing or proposed structures, fences, and retaining walls; and (vi) Natural features or vegetation left in natural state. (b) The required landscaping shall be installed prior to project occupancy. However, a certificate of occupancy may be issued prior to installation of the required landscaping if a bond or other form of appropriate surety is posted in a manner acceptable to the administrator. The time limit for compliance may be extended to allow installation of such required landscaping during the next planting season. (8) Maintenance. (a)All landscaping and necessary support systems shall be maintained for the life of the project. (b)All landscape materials shall be pruned and trimmed as necessary to maintain a healthy growing condition. (c) Landscape areas shall be kept free of trash. [Ord. 8-06§ 1] 18.30.100 Parking. (1) General Parking Standards. The following standards shall apply to all development under this code. (a) Off-street parking shall be established prior to occupancy of any new or expanded building or before a change occurs in the use of an existing building. Parking space requirements shall be determined from Table 6-2, and as follows: (i) Off-street parking ratios expressed as the number of spaces per square feet means the usable or net square footage of floor area, exclusive of nonpublic areas, such as building maintenance areas, storage areas, closets, or restrooms. If the formula for determining the number of off-street parking spaces results in a fraction, the number of spaces shall be rounded to the nearest higher whole number; (ii)Where other provisions of this UDC stipulate maximum parking allowed, or increase or reduce minimum parking requirements, those provisions shall apply; (iii)An applicant may request a modification of the minimum number of parking spaces by providing a study prepared by a qualified professional that substantiates that parking demand can be met with a reduced parking requirement. In such cases, the administrator may approve a reduction of the minimum number of spaces required; (iv)The current edition of the International Building Code shall be used to determine the number of occupants of a use; (v)The administrator may refer to the current edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual to determine the number of trips used to determine parking demand and may increase or reduce the required number of parking spaces based on actual usage or projected demand; and (vi) For unnamed uses, the administrator may require a study prepared by a licensed civil engineer that substantiates an acceptable parking requirement. (b) Parking for physically handicapped needs shall be provided consistent with state standards at a rate of not less than two percent of the total number of parking spaces, or a minimum of one parking space, whichever is greater. Single-family residences, including duplexes, are exempt from this requirement. Parking spaces for physically handicapped needs shall comply with ANSI 117.1-2003 (502.2 and 502.4.2). Such spaces shall be not less than 12 feet, six inches wide. (c)A parking layout plan shall be submitted to the administrator for approval consistent with requirements of Table 6-2 for all multifamily residential, commercial, industrial, institutional and small-scale recreation and tourist uses, at the time of application for any permit or land use activity required by this code. The layout plan shall conform to the general parking standards contained in this subsection. The administrator may refer any parking plan to the county engineer for technical review. (d) Required off-street parking located within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Master Program shall also be consistent with applicable provisions of this section. (e) Off-street parking areas containing five or more spaces shall be landscaped according to JCC 18.30.130(6). (f) The minimum parking space and aisle dimensions for the most common parking angles are shown in Table 6-3. For parking angles other than those shown on the chart, the minimum parking space and aisle dimensions shall be approved by the county engineer. (g) Owners of two or more adjoining uses, structures or lots may utilize jointly the same parking or loading area when the hours of operation do not overlap. in the event that owners of one or more adjoining uses, structures or lots desire to utilize jointly the same parking concurrently, the total requirement for parking spaces shall be the sum of the requirements for each individual use, unless the applicants can demonstrate to the administrator that a lower number of parking spaces are justified through implementation of transportation demand management strategies, off-peak use, availability and use of public transit or alternative modes of travel or other measures. (h) If lighting is provided, it shall be designed to minimize direct illumination of abutting properties and adjacent streets. (2) Parking Access Standards.All parking facilities shall be developed consistent with the following access standards: (a) Joint accesses for commercial, industrial and multifamily residential uses should be utilized whenever feasible. (b)All ingress and egress to a parking lot accessing an arterial or collector roadway shall be developed so vehicles entering and leaving the parking lot are headed in a forward motion. (c)Access points shall be located in a manner consistent with the standards of the Jefferson County department of public works or WSDOT, where applicable. (d) Limited access provisions shall be required when deemed necessary by the Jefferson County department of public works or WSDOT, where applicable. (3) General Off-Street Parking Construction Standards. (a)All required off-street parking shall be provided with an all-weather surface as required by the Jefferson County department of public works. (b) Grading work for parking areas shall meet the requirements of the International Building Code. Drainage and erosion or sedimentation control facilities shall be provided in accordance with JCC 18.30.060(2) and 18.30.070. (c)Wheel stops, striping, or similar measures are required where a parked vehicle would encroach on adjacent property, pedestrian access or circulation areas, rights-of-way, or landscaped areas. (d)Any lighting installed in parking areas shall be consistent with the requirements of JCC 18.30.140. Table 6-2. Minimum Number of Parking Spaces Required for Different Land Uses Land Use Minimum Number of Parking Spaces Requiredol COMMERCIAL USES Animal shelters, commercial 1 per 750 square feet plus 1 per employee kennels and catteries Automotive service and repair 2 spaces per bay or stall plus 1 space per employee Table 6-2. Minimum Number of Parking Spaces Required for Different Land Uses Land Use Minimum Number of Parking Spaces Requiredo) Bed and breakfast inn or residence 1 per guest room, plus 2 per facility Day care, group care, and 1 space per 10 people enrolled plus 1 for each staff member or volunteer residential care facilities on-site, but not fewer than 3 spaces Drinking and/or eating 1 per 100 square feet or 1 per 3 seats, whichever is greater. Seasonal establishments outside seating does not require additional parking Hotel/motel 1 per guest room plus 1 per employee Indoor entertainment facilities 1 per 4 seats or per 100 square feet of assembly area, whichever is greater Nursing homes/assisted living 5 plus 1 per 6 beds facilities Personal and professional services 1 space per 300 square feet plus 1 per employee, but not fewer than 3 and offices spaces Retail sales and services 1 per 300 square feet Unnamed commercial uses [Determined by the administrator] Industrial Uses For all industrial uses(except as 1 per employee plus 1 per 300 square feet of any associated retail sales listed below) area Heavy equipment rental services 1 per 750 square feet plus 1 per employee Recycling center 1 per 750 square feet plus 1 per employee Solid waste handling facilities 1 per 750 square feet plus 1 per employee INSTITUTIONAL USES College or technical school/adult 1 per classroom, plus 1 per 2 students education facility Community club or community 1 space per 300 square feet but not fewer than 5 spaces organization facility Emergency services [Determined by the administrator] Table 6-2. Minimum Number of Parking Spaces Required for Different Land Uses Land Use Minimum Number of Parking Spaces Requiredoi Government offices 1 space per 300 square feet but not fewer than 5 spaces Library 1 per 300 square feet Museum 1 per 800 square feet Post office 1 space per 300 square feet but not fewer than 5 spaces Religious assembly facility 1 per 5 fixed seats, plus 1 per 50 square feet of gross floor area without fixed seats used for assembly purposes School, primary and secondary 1 per 10 students enrolled plus 1 per employee Unnamed institutional uses [Determined by the administrator] SMALL-SCALE RECREATIONAL AND TOURIST USES For all small-scale recreational and [Determined by the administrator] tourist uses Unnamed small-scale recreational [Determined by the administrator] and tourist uses RESIDENTIAL USES Cottage industry 1 per 2 employees Group homes 1.5 per tenant Home business 2 per dwelling unit for each home business Mobile home parks 2 per dwelling unit Multifamily residential (3+ units) 1.5 per dwelling unit Single-family residential unit 2 per dwelling unit Two-family residential (duplex) 2 per dwelling unit Unnamed residential uses [Determined by the administrator] TRANSPORTATION USES All transportation-related uses [Determined by the administrator] Table 6-2. Minimum Number of Parking Spaces Required for Different Land Uses Land Use Minimum Number of Parking Spaces Requiredw UTILITIES USES All utilities and related uses [Determined by the administrator] AGRICULTURAL USES Agricultural activities None Accessory uses Parking fully accommodated on-site, unless otherwise permitted Forest products, processing 1 per employee activities Nurseries 1 per employee Unnamed agricultural uses ,[Determined by the administrator] Note: 1.At least one parking space must be provided, unless indicated by"None." SS :0 * .. tel � F r Table 6-3. Minimum Dimensions for Parking Stalls and Aisles Parking Stall Curb Stall Aisle Width (E) Unit Depth (F) Angle (A) Width (B) Length (C) Depth (D) 1-Way 2-Way 1-Way 2-Way 0 9.0 22.5 9.0 12.0 20.0 30.0 38.0 45 9.0 12.5 17.5 14.0 20.0 49.0 55.0 60 9.0 10.5 18.0 18.0 20.0 54.0 56.0 90 9.0 9.0 18.0 23.0 26.0 59.0 62.0 [Ord. 8-06§ 1] 18.30.140 Lighting. (1) Exterior Lighting. Exterior lighting shall not exceed 30 feet in height from the finished grade for commercial and industrial uses, and 20 feet for residential uses (except when such lighting is an integral part of the building). Exterior lighting shall be energy-efficient and shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflections are contained within the boundaries of the parcel. Exterior lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights-of-way. No lighting shall blink,flash, or be of unusually high intensity or brightness. All lighting fixtures shall be appropriate in scale, intensity, and height to the use they are serving. Any lighting installed in parking areas shall be of direct cutoff design so that the source is not visible from adjacent property. (2) Street Lighting. Street lighting may be provided by private parties on county roads, provided the design and location shall be approved by the county engineer, and a method to cover the cost of operation and maintenance is approved by the county engineer. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.40.530 Approval criteria for all conditional uses. (1)The county may approve or approve with modifications an application for a conditional use permit(i.e., uses listed in Table 3-1 in JCC 18.15.040 as"C(a)," "C(d)" or"C") if all of the following criteria are satisfied: (a)The conditional use is harmonious and appropriate in design, character and appearance with the existing or intended character and quality of development in the vicinity of the subject property and with the physical characteristics of the subject property; (b)The conditional use will be served by adequate infrastructure including roads, fire protection, water, wastewater disposal, and stormwater control; (c)The conditional use will not be materially detrimental to uses or property in the vicinity of the subject parcel; (d)The conditional use will not introduce noise, smoke, dust, fumes, vibrations, odors, or other conditions or which unreasonably impact existing uses in the vicinity of the subject parcel; (e)The location, size, and height of buildings, structures, walls and fences, and screening vegetation for the conditional use will not unreasonably interfere with allowable development or use of neighboring properties; (f)The pedestrian and vehicular traffic associated with the conditional use will not be hazardous to existing and anticipated traffic in the vicinity of the subject parcel; (g)The conditional use complies with all other applicable criteria and standards of this code and any other applicable local, state or federal law; and more specifically, conforms to the standards contained in Chapters 18.20 and 18.30 JCC; (h)The proposed conditional use will not result in the siting of an incompatible use adjacent to an airport or airfield; (i) The conditional use will not cause significant adverse impacts on the human or natural environments that cannot be mitigated through conditions of approval; (j) The conditional use has merit and value for the community as a whole; (k)The conditional use is consistent with all relevant goals and policies of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan; and (I) The public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effect. Consideration shall be given to the cumulative effect of similar actions in the area. (2) In instances where all of the above findings cannot be made, the application shall be denied. (3)The administrator may consider applications for modifications of lawfully established conditional uses and developments approved under this code and conditional uses in existence on December 18, 2000, when the application proposes to bring the existing use substantially closer to compliance with the standards of this code. The administrator may approve, conditionally approve, or deny the modification application. A site plan conforming to the provisions of this chapter and Article II, Project Permit Applications (Type I—IV), of this chapter shall accompany the application showing the location, size and type of modification proposed by the applicant. (4) Modifications may be approved by the administrator under Type I review procedures; provided, that the cumulative modifications of the approved use will not exceed the following limitations: (a)The modification will not increase residential use by more than one unit, if allowed by the land use district; (b)The modification will not increase the required amount of parking by more than 20 percent or 20 spaces (whichever is less); (c)The proposed modification will not expand the total square footage of all structures and/or outdoor use areas, excluding parking, by more than 20 percent. In addition, the proposed expansion of the structure shall not result in total size of the structure exceeding the maximum building size limits in Chapter 18.30 JCC; (d)The modification will not change or modify any special condition imposed under any previous official review; (e)The modification will not significantly reduce the amount or location of required site screening; (f) The modification will not expand an existing nonconforming use or structure, or render a conforming use or structure nonconforming; (g)The modification will not establish a new use; (h)The modification will not expand a mining/site operation, mineral processing or mineral batching activity; (i) In the determination of the administrator, the modification will not create or materially increase any adverse impacts or undesirable effects of the project, or cause the use or structure to become inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan or the purpose of the land use class and district. (5)All proposed uses, structures and site improvements (and modifications thereof) shall comply with the development standards of this code. (6)Any proposed modification that does not meet all the requirements of this subsection shall not be approved through this process, but shall be reviewed through the current review procedures as outlined by this chapter. (7) Decisions to administratively approve modifications shall be administered through a consistency review of development permits in accordance with this code and any previous conditions of approval. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.40.540 Additional conditions. The county may impose additional conditions on a particular use if it is deemed necessary for the protection of the surrounding properties, the neighborhood, or the general welfare of the public. The conditions may: (1) Increase requirements in the standards, criteria or policies established by this code; (2) Stipulate an exact location for the conditional use on the subject property as a means of minimizing hazards to life, limb, property damage, erosion, landslides or traffic; (3) Require structural features or equipment as a means of minimizing hazards to life, limb, property damage, erosion, landslides or traffic; or (4) Contain restrictions or provisions deemed necessary to establish parity with uses permitted in the same zone with respect to avoiding nuisance generating features in matters of noise, odors, air pollution, wastes, vibration, traffic and physical hazards. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.40.550 Use of property before final decision. No building permit shall be issued for any use involved in an application for approval for a conditional use permit until the conditional use permit is approved and becomes effective. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] • 18.40.560 Effective period - Expiration. (1)A conditional use permit automatically expires and becomes void if the applicant fails to file for a building permit or other necessary development permit within three years of the effective date (the date of the decision granting the permit) of the permit unless the permit approval provides for a greater period of time. (2) Extensions to the duration of the original permit approval are prohibited. (3)The department of community development shall not be responsible for notifying the applicant of an impending expiration. {Ord. 8-06§ 1] 18.40.570 Modification of a conditional use permit. The county may modify an approved conditional use permit as follows:the county may delete, modify or impose additional conditions upon finding that the use for which the approval was granted has been intensified, changed or modified by the property owner or by person(s)who control the property without approval so as to significantly impact surrounding land uses. A modification will be processed as a Type II land use decision pursuant to JCC 18.40.270. [Ord. 8-06 § 1] 18.40.580 Conditional use permit to run with the land. A conditional use permit granted under this article shall continue to be valid upon a change of ownership of the site, business, service, use or structure that was the subject of the permit application. No other use is allowed without approval of an additional conditional use permit. [Ord. 8-06§ 1] 18.40.590 Permit suspension or revocation. The county may suspend or revoke an approved conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 18.50 JCC upon finding that: (1)The use for which the approval was granted has been abandoned for a period of at least one year; (2)Approval of the permit was obtained by misrepresentation of material fact; or (3)The permit is being exercised contrary to the terms of approval. [Ord. 8-06§ 1] Joel Peterson From: Susan Porto Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 10:40 AM To: Joel Peterson Cc: Randy Marx Subject: Declined: Pre-Application Conference PRE14-00021 Joel, I will not be able to attend this meeting. I have asked both randy and linda to see if they are available and neither are. I can meet with the applicant separate from this meeting when I return on or after October 27th. Please give them my phone number and email address with my card and provide them with the following comments. I know a dialog with Randy Marx has already begun regarding the proposal for this site, with a licensed septic designer. The septic system for the site is to be used for toilet, sanitary needs of employees only and it's capacity will be assessed based on number of employees and size of the system (which Randy is already working on). From the pre-application, it appears the intent is to do nothing more than grow marijuana, no processing of the plants is proposed for the extraction of THC or creation of edibles. If that is the case standard procedure to date has been that when a triggering application is received by our office, (building permit, change of use, stormwater application etc), the application is forwarded to EH for review for both septic and water needs for the project. For 1-502 applications: • We requesting a copy of the OPERATION PLAN SUBMTTED TO LIQ CONTROL as a part of their license application. • When received we review the plan against what has been submitted to our department for approval. If there are inconsistencies we need to deal with that. • The OPERATION plan is scanned into an e-mail and forward it to applicable state agencies for their review and comment. • Depending on the comments back, the applicant may be obligated to proceed with other permit processes or not. Again, if they have more questions, have them contact me for an appointment for after I return. Susan Susa w Porto R..S. jeffersow CottAku PubLL,C FfeRLtlt Pliowe 360. 3859.404 Fax 360. s79.4487 ,4Lwa js wo02i.v g for n safer r ea!thitrJef fersovt.Coutn,tuj CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message,including any attachments,is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,use,disclosure,or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT NOTICE: All e-mail sent to this address has been received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is therefore subject to the Public Records Act,a state law found at RCN 42.56. Under the Public Records law the County must release this e-mail and its contents to any person who asks to obtain a copy(or for inspection)of this e-mail unless it is exempt from disclosure under state law,including RCW 42.56. 1 ICEEDV SEP 2 2 2014 1= LRG W N13 � N ... :G - 11717.- Ir - 0 t ; I : 1 <m _ 6110 D �' 1 b 0 62 g, O m y V7 Q=q C o - m - x .* m O co o n - N N a M D F S N D . _ 0 ' N � v N .a m n ao N G f* N C'1 cp0 fD a a a IV E / n , / \, L : d O - ���LLL O E< OI r O 3 ro 3 D iiii IT-I + I I C 3 - 3 ^O , _ 3 Allhall°1 Cl V1 .411111, ,:,I 1 _ CL _O liild FVF 10'1 �. 5-6%Slope :.., : 14114:\. ...... A.:.,,..licn ill, ! N. 14 � 1 I upi . E' N� L a -n CD = < O =• O rr l.0'< rr 0 N rr 11 [10 O v) Q Q.lD d7 �. • -n CCtl d4 v) A I-S c n p CD 7crl 00 D Nr O v l0 N Q 1-1lb W CSD W r O O �i (D O� tl CO eq. (11 In P rnm -4 (1) 0 cD m u, d 2 3 m 03 g • @ ' -c. TOZ0098V6 1 N d `� �! �60Z- N 3 A 5. C O 3 3 D a' i o m D ,L O a 3 6 O �?�� °N 0£ 3 > j // w 8 P 8 X ! r W a v - N w m X N * im S. tf, C X u, v IF N ZA w W A 3 d O to D) -O T W CRI B `I p X CO o w O 0 (0 LO 0 I 0 N Q < (D y ID -. 00 ri) 3 o co, T O O Q �'� Fila W < I O aon s ID C cn < N N �� vN I —O — ' II ID (1,(D (D X im Ji 7 O - Q co -< u,C) OSt'° m- dCD WII O ^ A mO O .m _ CD A- , Q c -n trDd - Cd' ' O YCD2 / o 107 o SE ot O (D /' TCMa N �.�+0 (.71 CD •/ OD /O F. -0 iD \ o .asnoyuaal9 0£ X,bZ_a j r ro_,, / 9 X o v m asnoyuaaa9 ,0£TX,bZ 3 - 0) _- < m` -I CD fD O , v a m LO _ cu '< o asnoyuaa l9 ,0£TX,bZ co cn Q (D 0 '-0 O n -0 O co ' (D r i NJ - c Q A y n. V) 0 asnoyuaa.l9 ,O£TX,tZ 0 0 _ � Do -CD �-(Dr_a - v (D N < 2 O s . dasnoyuaaag ,0£ZX,bZo N oc - CO 0 fp O C -00 m - o n 0 cr asnoquaa.lg ,0£TX,bZ to -n m c T DO T D N - —o asnoyuaaa9 ,0£TX,bZ 11* 11 0O + N o v, \ o ,60Z - Ix~ co S -1-1 x W 7 (D C d D , O_ v Q tu v In D° O£ a) O 7 N rt F' D n -, N V 0 CNC Cr o Z 00 * G O a rn to m 3 ,, rt� FITrDD v G>vto X. at1 a_, it TO_ � m oto Cl. O O � c::)-- r°A O 3T (D -O Q • w C 0�1 03• D V) (DD Q 'i'• O re) 0 03 ^ 9• l'ArD o O n W rt ON �1„ �$ N tl rD o (D fD 7 0 rt n v3 VI-P' R O Y �y�S (n $' --j (4. Co m cn m d m io : O3 x � - W Z0Z0098176 q 60Z� �_ 2 r.) o _ mm D1N3msm n , A 3 Q m a ��-. ,� O '�1 b o ' o m o �?r�� 3m - = _/ 0£ WR 2 0x r D m 3 v Lo rn co �)J 3 3 11/1/• A_ I A r7 u,- 73 ea "OO o `+ I cr.) m -s O / I O 0 < LA O3 0 —O / N o, c N _ O a 0 p c I _in 0 vNn O' / Z K• _ qD4. .0../r\ ~ 0em O !., ui 0iO n O o- W Uf UN n m N W II O infD O / p c x 5 O N _ . / 6/ _ T 00 0 / C r I / - A p O -/ a / ;) - • m S'. v i • -I 1 .-* », —O m 3 O - °9' co '� W _ - a -* 3 - o m J a -1 o 00 OD n K 0 G vn £ <' o, 7 —01 C• a A in -00I 4.- o Li o - /.i Dp a co' A ? (o X (D Z 3 a N VI Ly II (D N Ll — iv CO CD 0 II O % , N 3 O LT, o. ,tel o f V co ' I I-1 O - I\3 T 00 = 2 A -0 OO a V7 7 (11 O -nO m l70 , m 0 [D .-r ' I i• m fl zip C CI 11 I N = w co N I 1 1 -O n 0 f r S- Vf m I \ A`p� IV E (D , Ol (/1 1 ,60Z- L.i .- I 8(7'4? CD rr " O co (/c O, O m , �' x D(o C�C CCD 0 - � o o 5 O (n (AD * (J) Z O ' ___, 00, r+ N C fll 7 C Z. — y N 0 N O O O 'G • D) CpC co Q n O_ N O -Q f0 -' 0 7. c Ol� G C > > N 400, 3 3 N T ,0� O7 -S -, ` 8 0 N N Q' N N m n eY N y = s O CO W o * N O (D OO CN Q �• N N N (T -I K _, =d N ez N m OO C G — O co m ANT = 0 Z lI N'O N cN� o O (o N N < (0 Cr Q1 (D N 'S n - G03 S.. ',Tip F GF.A+ m o o N W < O G m O 7 m N n art < `� p� � ,•< -• 0 V N s - CD < cn 00 0 ami O r+ (n ' .�. O m m. n o n 0 2 = c$ O n W p OW .,�: , 'c c'C11� 0 -0 3, w c,m m p m O fD 01 (0 (7D (LA D A[O y � 3 m v o No I--+ Co ,-+ N !Z Ui E Clm 3 N 9, o co R 91 0 - n 0 N —v Drainage Analysis and Stormwater Findings 192 W. Fredericks Street; Port Townsend, WA 98368 Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 Parcel Area 78,676 SF (1.8 acres) Surface Gradient The site is gently sloped, with an overall surface gradient downhill to the central northern area of the parcel, at slopes varying from 3 to 6%. Vegetation Undeveloped portions of the site are fully vegetated with mature plants, shrubs and trees. Soil Types Soils are generally sandy and appear to be very well-drained. The soil evaluation reported in the 2002 septic system design indicates generally highly-permeable sandy soils,with evidence of historical prolonged saturation at depths varying from 3 to 7 ft below ground surface. A soil test boring conducted by Streamline Environmental, Inc., on September 13, 2014, indicated medium-grained sands to at least 5 ft below ground surface, with no evidence of historical prolonged saturation. Surface Waters/Surface Flows No indications of surface flow were observed on the site or in the immediate vicinity. Downstream Analysis The ground surface generally slopes toward properties to the north of the subject parcel. However, no indications of stormwater surface flow were observed at the site. The greater vicinity slopes generally to the northeast and east. No DNR streams are reported within 4,000 ft of the subject parcel. Existing Development includes a 2,592 SF building, a 576 SF garage, and an approximately 6,500 SF gravel driveway. Existing Stormwater Management Facilities No enhanced stormwater management facilities currently exist. Proposed Development includes seven greenhouses totaling 21,840 SF of impervious surface (roofs), and two 7,000 SF buildings. Stormwater Recommendations Stormwater Management Strateay Full on-site infiltration of stormwater should be feasible. Proposed Downspout Dispersal & Infiltration Downspouts with splash blocks are recommended, with the ground surface graded and re-vegetated to route downspout flow into vegetated swales and a below-grade infiltration trench as shown on Sheet 3 Stormwater Site Plan. Artificially created flow paths should readily allow infiltration. These flow paths should be configured to allow emergency overflows at locations shown on Stormwater Site Plan Proposed Infiltration Trench North of Greenhouses The land area north of the greenhouses is at a higher elevation than the greenhouse footprints. As such, surface dispersal is not recommended in this location since the flow direction would likely be south toward the greenhouses. Therefore, a below-grade infiltration trench, with an infiltrative surface at a lower elevation than the greenhouses floor elevation is recommended. Proposed Vegetated Swale* Two vegetated infiltration swales are recommended as shown on Sheet 3 Stormwater Site Plan (one between the proposed greenhouses and the proposed buildings, and one south of the proposed buildings). These surface infiltration features Prepared by: Everett A.Sorensen,P.E. Draned Impervious Surfaces. Ewsting and Proposed Streamline Environmental, Inc. Area Square Ft Discharges to nt Street;Port Townsend,WA 98368-2405 Existing Bulking 2,592 Splash Blocks � "� A. SQR� tett@streamlineenvSeptember 360-821-9960.com; 2,204 Existing Garage 576 Splash Blocks \k`••-O �'VAs/j 426 Revised Driveway 4,500 Disperses • 'L 2 Splash Blocks.Vegetated Swale and �,t Propomd Greenhouses 21,840 —,,. o Infiltration Trench Proposed Buildings 14.000 Splastl Blocks.Vegetated Swale r z C Proposed Total Impervious Area 43,508 163 4 X404 Parcel Area 78,576 Square Feet �� / ti Sc, Proposed Impervious Coverage: 55 % Pi • Al Prescribed Infiltration Surface: 1,240 SF From D.O.E. Stornwater Manual for ZONAL medium sands Sheet 4 of 5 Stormwater Findings and Recommendations 192 W. Fredericks Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 ENVIRONMENTAL Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Temporary Erosion & Sedimentation Control Notes 192 W. Fredericks Street; Port Townsend, WA 98368 Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 Mark Clearing Limits Establish Construction Access Install Sediment Controls including Silt fences downhill of area of proposed disturbance. Stabilize Soils Stabilize temporarily exposed soils with straw. Cover soil piles with secured plastic sheeting if soil will remain in pile for at least 2 days during wet season(7 days during dry season). Control Pollutants Prevent discharge or release of all pollutants, including motor oil and construction debris. Maintain TE&SC Features All Temporary Erosion &Sedimentation Control Features must be inspected regularly, and maintained& repaired as needed. Manage Project Assess conditions regularly and adjust construction stormwater management features as needed. A. SORA, JF4 E WA+y �'d' SJO1 AL Prepared by: Everett A.Sorensen,P.E. Sheet 5 of 5 Streamline15Grt Street;Environmental,Inc. Temporary Erosion & SedimentationControls 715 Grant Street;Port Townsend,WA 98368-2405 p y everett@streamlineenv.com;360-821-9960 September 22,2014 192 W. Fredericks Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 ENVIRONMENTAL 192 W. Fredericks, P/N 948601301 1 ; : . GMED I I I CEEB I 948600204 I 948800301 M..74nrnv 1 1 .,L.,'',,. Ilik elly% ik t. ... 948601201 948801202 .. . . 1 ...:... 4 i Ili 1 iv 4 . 9482.. ..601 18ca. Ir'rrnA,k) .,. i I .- Ak. , CEO ''' CM= 048601702 -----,— . , • '1 ' g . en .. • 1 2' I 9480 t6C6 94862):',D2 84866C:401 010,0D:92" 94861.302 04.28 :2 61...382 ,1 2 - .,. .. AD" .. .=1612 , 948601201 I . ....... --------- . , / --...---a- ,,... 0488046C0 .., i 9080170 9411601702 Se I 192 W. Fredericks, P/N 948601301 948600102 .948600201 948600204 948600301 948600302 «w a f a 2 1119 948601201 X948601202:g , CCSED 94860 40 t 948601301. 94860120' 948604202.. 94864'x':- J_. 'fi' f1ed91ick9$t_. 948E01603 94860<SC1 (MP l 1 a _ 978601E01 "11701 x 9486011 702 94!801809. 948600102 x i _'16c '•e_. W8M W 9486(05�� 94860140/ ,•,->' •'�., W FoidMd415t _.. 948601 v.. ]2 948601 Y4 "":3I 948901791 948901702' -1,4 Plot plan states "property line" ] Assessor's Map(Property lines on submitted plot plan must match the pnperty lines as identified on theAssessor's 1/4 map) [y]- Legal Access to Property CWs NO Parcel Tags or Scanned Documents NO 0etc-i :15 -f---1ESA's: Special Reports Nearby YES Ty. Designated Ag YES Shoreline Designation: YES [ ] Shoreline Slope Stability: YES Stream Type:YES FWHCA: YES 4. Wetlands: YES Rare Plants:YES Ca) Seismic: YES Landslide: YES Flood: YES • Erosion: YES Aquifer Recharge Ares j� NO Scn Sc_, SIPZ: At Risk High Risk Coastal CMZ: o = High Risk Moderate Risk Disconnected CMZ Storm,water site plan submitted:to> o if, So e.y) Forest Lands: YES CM Adjoining Forest Lands: Commercial/ Rural/ Inholding Th.] Mineral Lands: YES �] Agricultural Lands: YES Archaeology: YES —T--4 No Shooting Zone: YES ic [ Stormwater: New Impervious Surface Land Disturbing Activity ESA's Stormwater Req's:Min Req#2 Min Req#1 thru#5 Min Req#1 thru#10 Engineering Notice Provisions/Disclosure:Airport YEs eMRL YEs NO Forest Lands YES 4:0` 41110 Landscaping Required:Yes No %1110 Parking Spaces Required NO 2 Q er f Building Height: 35' UBC Standard [ ] Impervious Surface coverage percentage: Resource Lands&Public: 10% Rural Residential: 25% Rural Industrial: Per UDC Sec 6.7 Rural Commercial: 60% Area of Building Coverage:60%in Rural Industrial Lands only [ ] Total Building(s) Size: RVC:20,000 SF CC:5,000 SF NC:7,500 SF GC: 10,000 SF All others:subject to septic&water constraints/None specified [ ] Setbacks: Front: Left Side: Right Side: Rear: Shoreline Setback: NIA LSHA Setback: gs/t NJ Road Classification: C 4,93 y/9 - . ,/ /km qua" Road Approach: -MtG NOT REQ'D RAP SEPA Required: YES EXEMPT [ ] Flood Certificate: Lk. 13 , is�5 1-12 w� '"wic omi SOpt i/ 9L [ ] Existing Case(s)& ondition(s): 4'r SR v1LVQ i 5 8a, Ute✓ 75/1/64(Vcooa(0 Violations: Yes [ ] Recorded Date of Subdivision: AFN Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions: <5yrs=Plat Conditions on plat or Old Ordinance [ ] Lots/Require Declaration of Restrictive Covenant YES NO, submitted: YES NO [ ] UGA No Protest Agreement YES NO, submitted: YES NO [ ] Site Visit conducted YES (tI ' [ ] Require Final Zoning Approval E ) NO [ ] ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan case N/A YES New Parcel Tags entered in Permit Plan N/A YES Special Reports Scanned N/A YES Title Notes Undated Parcel tags found for parcel 948601301 1.) WSRC Coaching - 2013-06-12, CZ 9/4/13 Other Associated CASES status issued finaled description 948601301 BLD03-00028 F 2/4/2003 2/15/2008 ADD BATHROOM TO EXISTING WORKSHOP MLA02-00517 PRJ02-00159 P CARPORT BLD02-00573 F 10/21/2002 3/6/2003 CARPORT BLD02-00574 F 10/21/2002 3/6/2003 GARAGE/STORAGE BUILDING PRE14-00021 P Proposed I-502 Agriculture Structures. Two structures will handle interior growing operations,and will be pre-engineered metal buildings of a TYPE IIB construction. The third structure will consist of seven gutter-connected greenhouses,categorized as temporary building structures The Existing septic system is planned to support the minimal employees.the Site has an existing PUD Water and Power Service. RAP02-00038 F 3/8/2002 12/12/2002 ROAD APPROACH&911 -W FREDERICKS ST SEP02-00111 F 6/21/2002 1/30/2008 SOM02-00111 RCR 9/19/2014 �c-- �.JJ M � II`�1� � � V 1�l lb m F 3 .- 3 — N ma.. E ox SI ' " , iJ cn O m x, =' .�; Iiiii) • O N v n N G • e 2 N v ti kIv re. n co G n < n0 0 13 J !G co ( C h (DWg. IP III II° i V II' 1.7 IliJ I .m Ja D r? N Wt CJ ' ``I n v o JI o J I In m ♦ / ---1 __�'i....�... .:,!:N.ae1' �. 5-6%Slope ,V'' .TAT4. -,,' " O m , y a rb '° C s Cq>.4: -, 1 .;:.,, a.o1s I L . Iv N 1 1 rr 1 G I o =. .: o C v r+ < 0 et -0 no N ni-1 - `Ovo m fD Q1 H T• X v m � rt Z N Q Q �' 1 lir. lD• T C CD (7c1 vi ' Q1 cO N rt N ;11.40 {I W -1 W Oet O p N 01 N = "' N CO el. N U-I .5`,, ItU } § \ / [ ; � 3 ' | . `{ \ Ef mmOgk / | IV CD ,mz iiii) r (} § \ % $ < 4 = 0) mE � z 5 ° r I co \ , § / \ r m � §\ } \ 7 2 I E ' ` > • 2co co cr. 713 3 ¢ A ; ce co � Do = o $ k ] � I % i \ o < m = . 2 ® , m , � « / 5 0 £ % q /?ƒ , « » � S } § , % $ _. $ E • CD =1: i \ / i § —o $ - k . ¥ iJ — / \ \ /^^` : \<'":� 9VI OP = m; ® / i � ) � 77 *E ® M` SEi � i / ° CI75 k // $% _a / § 2 a _ 0 2 a mgea/ !%qz -o /. — § | � H• \ . H. - 7 .0.7 £ amgeJJOEI Z ( — a, — < \ %—§ § � Sk 2( _ o o7 , , « gaB ,+iyv «°E = 0 - n & a -�/\ \ § I ° R 0 _ C ` > 0- ) \ «mquiOEI z o - m > \ —§ $= m—o 2 m , < 0 , 0ro �k II \ " g 3 co «mgUJ ) OEI z § . » = R $� R oc kcm \ o \ / K < � amLeeDD«I z (‘D-- N.) QQ S amyeeg ,«9,� co 3 ) �)—. n \ ,mz* T1V o tin � Z ` � rn� ..< 7 k / ƒ \ ,« CD no ® / C / 0 \ X � �a t -.K3 % ƒ \ { G �I1 / \t. ƒ [ \ ("D \ ƒ J � /� � � ® } ! § a # ƒ G n = y� 00 • » r % k $ t. ° � ' w 3 \ M $ $ ] $ ro- \ o / q ° & 0 •ey. f0� w 00 } & 2 , 0 EM CD CD CW Ft CD : cno o2 6\d j' W a f . ZOZ0098b6 3 N D m ,60Z- m 0 33 m - CD j 3"'' .gym. N ' w D 11 T, 2 ? a ��i <1.• O O rTh O O m N _ > >� /' .0£ III Wim ; 0x r , a c m NG fri x � D CD ;, o W Iv J� ago 2 IV -a i m O O ry 3 O o T C' !D ON o, N _O -1 0 0_ / 0 a = CD c / u a - Q. N N N / N o , - fD -, r*o D p N I� ro O 'IV o_ - W °J u, ' / x <O tCo u, v', ^ to w II O N N G [7 F ^ Ul (D O O CO w O (D• x ___ * .- —Q CD O !L a '. c = ^ i O Q- o o c m `n-► p1 ^ - 3 1� ox 0 C A o 11) ro 3 O) m , Elk _ I F_ _ 3 O m a Ol m '-r 72 O o amJ6 - u a O o m —(n - IZCO us, to (D L o 41- ON 0 co I-. a ]� Q 1-. O 1-. m o - v�^ D 0 Q v -, 2 ? �• - -lip CD IXJI II N F-4 f0 O II O N m p - N co a �oT� J0 W i 'CO C N - N C. 2 1 A �n v (1 m' r-r —O K O 07 c 1 0 N " p ,. v' = N �' 3 0 T (D 3 - 5 T ' Q -1 K , , c r QIv� O N , • O 0 N 6 0 Z A ; ► , o o ` xa N m v n, C -0 z O v,CD p c cu HH'!IHII ! -1 O1 `� N n r-F (fl N co N = W W 7 ,i, (D n (D -1 N Q r+ m w °: -i -u � a m 0 m V— 0 CD - p N cD � jV T ? K N O C ti, N 74 m N 3 = i !D v sn • ���ti �rFy 08ym0n- mm o CD 2D Q 's �� p ;A' `G 3 3 m v CAA 0 < C3D 2 2 '~ < n 00• > — -, rt) r � Ln ...\ DD 2a 0.T 4 — c — O 01 VD N 0) 17 rt lu •• y O.. m 0: g (0 n 87,03 '2C � I-1 n W r p W 2 tA� �'� � N 5 m m Q1 v_ v 0 (A) (A1 (D c N p 0 N 3 W N O N 2Dft, -., cp m c �, �' co �. O v Oa ,--i. In Q Ul i ' *�� d co 3 O 7 y 5 O- N 1 Drainage Analysis and Stormwater Findings 192 W. Fredericks Street; Port Townsend, WA 98368 Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 Parcel Area 78,676 SF (1.8 acres) Surface Gradient The site is gently sloped, with an overall surface gradient downhill to the central northern area of the parcel, at slopes varying from 3 to 6%. Vegetation Undeveloped portions of the site are fully vegetated with mature plants, shrubs and trees. Soil Types Soils are generally sandy and appear to be very well-drained. The soil evaluation reported in the 2002 septic system design indicates generally highly-permeable sandy soils,with evidence of historical prolonged saturation at depths varying from 3 to 7 ft below ground surface. A soil test boring conducted by Streamline Environmental, Inc., on September 13, 2014, indicated medium-grained sands to at least 5 ft below ground surface, with no evidence of historical prolonged saturation. Surface Waters/Surface Flows No indications of surface flow were observed on the site or in the immediate vicinity. Downstream Analysis The ground surface generally slopes toward properties to the north of the subject parcel. However, no indications of stormwater surface flow were observed at the site. The greater vicinity slopes generally to the northeast and east. No DNR streams are reported within 4,000 ft of the subject parcel. Existing Development includes a 2,592 SF building, a 576 SF garage, and an approximately 6,500 SF gravel driveway. Existing Stormwater Management Facilities No enhanced stormwater management facilities currently exist. Proposed Development indudes seven greenhouses totaling 21,840 SF of impervious surface (roofs), and two 7,000 SF buildings. Stormwater Recommendations Stormwater Management Strateay Full on-site infiltration of stormwater should be feasible. Proposed Downspout Dispersal & Infiltration Downspouts with splash blocks are recommended, with the ground surface graded and re-vegetated to route downspout flow into vegetated swales and a below-grade infiltration trench as shown on Sheet 3 Stormwater Site Plan. Artificially created flow paths should readily allow infiltration. These flow paths should be configured to allow emergency overflows at locations shown on Stormwater Site Plan Proposed Infiltration Trench North of Greenhouses The land area north of the greenhouses is at a higher elevation than the greenhouse footprints. As such, surface dispersal is not recommended in this location since the flow direction would likely be south toward the greenhouses. Therefore, a below-grade infiltration trench, with an infiltrative surface at a lower elevation than the greenhouses floor elevation is recommended. Proposed Vegetated Swales Two vegetated infiltration swales are recommended as shown on Sheet 3 Stormwater Site Plan(one between the proposed greenhouses and the proposed buildings, and one south of the proposed buildings). These surface infiltration features Prepared by: Everett A.Sorensen,P.E. Draned Impervious Surfaces, Existing and Proposed Streamline Environmental, Inc. Area Square Ft Discharges to -.'ntStreet; Port Townsend,WA 98368-2405 A, SOR - t@streamlineenv.com;360-821-9960 Existing Bulking 2592 Splash Blocks '�� ' 4 MIAs"! J; September 22.2014 Existing Garage 576 Splash Blacks J o It C�',2 Revised Driveway 4,500 Disperses Proposed Greenhouses 21,840 Splash Blocks.Vegetated Swale and � A Infiltration Trench ` 0 Proposed Buildings 14.000 Splash Blocks,Vegetated Swale ,_ Proposed Total trrpervious Area 43,508 0.1k '4., 32 cq Parcel Area 78.676 Square Feet .ice' Proposed Impervious Coverage: 55 % From D D.E. Starmvater Manual for Prescribed Irditrabon Surface: 1.240 SF medium sands Sheet 4 of 5 Stormwater Findings and Recommendations 192 W. Fredericks Street STREAM Port Townsend, WA 98368 ENVIRONMENTAL Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Temporary Erosion & Sedimentation Control Notes 192 W. Fredericks Street; Port Townsend, WA 98368 Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 Mark Clearing Limits Establish Construction Access Install Sediment Controls including Silt fences downhill of area of proposed disturbance. Stabilize Soils Stabilize temporarily exposed soils with straw. Cover soil piles with secured plastic sheeting if soil will remain in pile for at least 2 days during wet season(7 days during dry season). Control Pollutants Prevent discharge or release of all pollutants, including motor oil and construction debris. Maintain TE&SC Features All Temporary Erosion & Sedimentation Control Features must be inspected regularly, and maintained&repaired as needed. Manage Project Assess conditions regularly and adjust construction stormwater management features as needed. _1.1. A. SO/ep WAs � o yr�s� ssiONAt,E�G Prepared by: Everett A.Sorensen, P.E. Sheet 5 of 5 Streamline Environmental,Inc. 715 Grant Street;Port Townsend,WA 98368-2405 Temporary Erosion & Sedimentation Controls everett@streamlineenv.com;360-821-9960 192 W. Fredericks Street September 22,2014 Port Townsend, WA 98368 �TRE/�IIRLlNE Jefferson County Parcel Number 948601301 ENVIRONMENTAL UDC CONSISTENCY REVIEW Project Planner: Master#PRE14-00021 Review Type Project Description S✓I p PRE14-00021 Proposed I-502 Agriculture Structures. Two structures will handle interior growing operations,and will be pre-engineered metal buildings of a TYPE IIB construction. The third structure will consist of seven gutter-connected greenhouses,categorized as temporary building structures The Existing septic system is planned to support the minimal employees.the Site has an existing PUD Water and Power Service. Primary: CHRISTOPHE GRACE Site Address: 507 TAFT ST 192 W FREDERICKS ST PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368-4437 PORT TOWNSEND WA, 98388 APL DREAM CITY LLCP.0 1909 p / 11 PORTOTOWNSEND WA 98368 ( 1tY 6© � 3 0 REP SIMON LITTLE STUDIO STL, INC 210 N VICTORY AVE. PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368 Project Location: Parcel Number: 948601301 S-T-R: 16-30N-1W Total Acreage 2 Legal Description EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13,LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN Land Use: 9800 VAC ALLEY, SOPHIA ST, & SNAC ELWOOD ST ADJ Flood District: Fire District: 1 Planning Area: 2 Flood Map(FIRM)Panel No: chool D 50 Zoning: COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: UGA Trans yp(,HiV Ct$i,,4.4. 4k. 2940-B Limited Lane NW �' ..,/-.N....1 Olympia,WA 1)73502 7. Asx gni ..x ORCA I-800-422-5623 • 1.350)539.7610 •' � rax•F3601 441-1308 Medical Marijuana Facilities — Air permit required? INSTRUCTIONS: The following information is needed in the project description of an application for a medical marijuana facility to determine whether an air permit through ORCAA is required. Please provide this information to ORCAA when an application is submitted to a local city or countyofficial. ORCAA will provide confirmation regarding air permit applicability via email or in writing based on the information provided in this form. If an air permit is required, it must be approved by ORCAA prior to beginning construction of the facilit . FACILITY INFORMATION Facility Name: Owner/Operator Name: Facility Address: Contact Name&Title: Phone&Email: Contact Address: Cty/Cnty Application# PROJECT DESCRIPTION INFORMATION NEEDED 1. Narrative description of the facility including a list of all products produced and total area of facility. 2. Site map of the proposed facility to scale showing: Property boundaries ❑ Locations of growing and processing buildings ❑ Location of any exhaust points and the exhaust rate for each point fl Location of any major equipment such as boilers, heaters or engines 3. WIII the facility include any of the following equipment(check all that apply): ❑ Boilers or heaters(gas fired)with a design heat input 5 MMBtulhr or greater ❑ Boilers or heaters(diesel or solid fuels)with a design heat input greater than 1 MMBtu/hr O Emergency Engines:Size(in kW or Hp): ❑ Other Stationary Engines: Size(in kW or Hp): Use: ❑ Ozone Generators ❑ Dryers with active exhaust: Exhaust rate(in acfm): ❑ Processing buildings with active exhaust: Exhaust rate(in acfm): p Growing buildings or greenhouses with active exhaust:Exhaust rate(in acfm): O Exhaust filters,scrubbers or carbon filters used for any exhaust point O Solvent extraction 4. Will the operations include use of any solvent, cleaner or other material containing a volatile organic? Yes-Provide the following: Material safety data sheets for all materials containing a volatile organic compound. o The estimated annual usage of the material in gallons and description of how the material will be used No Marijuana Operations :9-\e/Teiso, , 4 P Pollution Prevention Public HealtFi� g Pro ram itg..." FS Marijuana extraction and production may produce wastes.Start your °NES business off on the right foot by following waste management practices. Other agencies may have '° additional requirements. Be Examples of Waste sure to check with other 111 i agencies such as: • Solvents from extraction(acetone, butane,hexane,chloroform,and • Community Develop alcohols) 0 0' ment (Building Permits 360.379.4450 • Mercury containing lights, (high —i 1 intensity lights) Olympic is Re ion Clean Air Agency • Herbicides and Pesticides l 800.422.5623 • Wastewater • Department of Agricul- ture 360.902.1800 • City of Port Townsend Waste Management Wastewater Treatment • Keep containers of waste closed • Label containers with their contents and risk,for example "Waste .� Solvent"and"Flammable" • Segregate wastes do not mix them .r. 1111 • Use containers free of rusts,leaks,and dents • Keep waste disposal records • Keep waste and chemicals away from storm drains Label containers and store them in secondary contain- Wastewater ment away from drains. Process wastewater may have solvents,fats,oils and grease(FOG) that affect the wastewater treatment plant.Whether you're in the city or on a septic system,you may need a grease trap interceptor or a grease trap. Solvents,corrosive materials,and other high-strength wastes should never be put down the sewer or septic system. These can disrupt the sanitary system or ruin your septic system. PUBLIC HEALTH ALWAYS WORKING FOR A SAFER AND HEALTHIER COMMUNITY • Grow OperationsI '' ‘‘�1 I Marijuana plant matter waste must be rendered unus- - ' 1 able prior to leaving a licensed producer or processor's , � — 1 1 facility. 1 1 11 1 .. 1 Grind and incorporate the marijuana with non- 1 I consumable solid waste so there is at least fifty percent 1 I non-marijuana waste. Examples of non-consumable, 1 1 solid waste include: r 1 • Paper '.� 1 I • Plastic 1 I • Cardboard 1 I • Food 1 I • Grease or other compostable oil waste 1 1 • Compost activators 1 ( • Soil j • Where to Dispose of Hazardous Waste If your business generates small amounts of waste (less than 2201bs a month),you are eligible to use the Household Hazardous Waste Facility.. Port of Port Townsend Boat Haven 282 10th Street BLDG 19 ,# i 4 t, Near Key City Fish + _ R : Closed on Public Holidays I a `r , -31III o®Ia . � - 1,igr or" JO—l . I si' ,s' 12mSt- ,..4,4 a / 9 Open Fridays ,101 i Qs 10 to 12 and 12:30 to 4:30 360. 379.6911 a, '40+0 For a list of additional disposal options, please see our publication,Small Business Pollution Prevention Program, Pub- lication Number EHSW 12-001 5/30/14 Publication Number EHSW 14-004 Map Output Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Ma 966743003 986703002 986ro3t02 966743+00. 986702001.98670290a 986703004 98670300 986743/10 9416703101 9667042612 986704202986704201986704203. 966704101 986J40100. , . � : .17linig.„141 s�1�C 986744004 �'' . 948600101 948600102 071.77;71) 046600204 948600301 948600302. Legend i 0 Selected Features ,• / JC Roads 948601201 948601203 1 Parcels+4 L 948604441 "948601341 048601202 2013 Aerial Photos tillir 948601201` 948601,, 948601202. 3 I i J 948601547 94860 6513 al i I . 948601502,948601504. 94260'601 -.„: S '.. 1 948601702 .94860'+701 94860'609 ilk"'""" . Sandstone Ln 05 violf 4,:948602805: .948642806 948602701 .948602702 ... 948442602 418602601 4.1sxsrnided sr,x6 zmCareCareyCeara Ss-.�oa GIS - s 1 . , I FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- efferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its ollection. Tue Oct 14 13:00:04 2014 - - I http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&Client V ersion=... 10/14/2014 Map Output Page 1 of 2 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map 486to,aot 1 963302S,U 9&670t MI 9M.70.802 q6670101.0111111 95)S/CC:12.:.• 686/0(01? '21. U6SM:Y.:•:::2 r.)..:."6Y.)::•2 9)Y-.51,..:25Q' r- C i-gr5.?::::'2!•::::;4 1.3 LA':••••.',..-.....:•:.` 463.303CO3 9B3303+.)M Reynalds Rd '" i./0.1,........3 C ±9.91 , ,2',',2 '3 8 6 laig:.2 Sitkar.:•2•1Cd •. 61011611.3 9di...".::4•AY '.45-:•,......3"..:4 ..;&-i./...)-22.2• y86703301 ',••))6"....3.:Y,' ,...1).53..'03•0' Mg 533{13-C2 '35EN3r:r2.1 9r3rSIC."3"L. I .651.14)3'Cw1 .'466,..:,-12,:ri :Jeb±c.u.v 4561,A•c- slc,ic.:.• '...e.i6.ei.:.-3..w.)`: ilialk :94860::•°,"' 94."-'423 sr&r,Ici•c..i , 986703801 -..A•gthi:c.-'Dz ..., , „7&1- 1 i illa' v4wv.14'-'' 948€0.Y.:3::,• -9456°°4°1 .'4860050 i ,94495202+A .134'.„„vitiol i ,..1.m.47,-2,...." II aValar30110 !..04860100g 9.)&i.2.--1•-•' $4860'3•::' r S•186e.:.'202 WAS111111, f.,.. „ma !imam 62 1900000 4166•1'2C). ,,,A 948601103 i 949601001 -----WIIIMses6 .1V Fietlettcliti St—" Fattlefil**-: k0486049 I • t c.1,1,262.. 2,2 96380102 9001901 8 . '-',` ...?..18€4.::'SO4 -41111948601600 774 r7 6416111111111 °94a601 948601wAitime601601 949631702 9486°1963 .448601902 Sandstone Ln 948602601 948602807 94.M02302 C 9.16e02/02 J /Miff 948602602 ( Wasouot 9486928°1 9466-)2W3 a ').18602103 948602603 948802501 R Cottage PI 6486026Ct 94660108 P.,9 916WYX,3 6')9486038. . q486029C2 , A 9•4860260' 6486:N2_"42-1 9486C"5 Li) 2 948T8803205141124a6°33°2 94.55021 Baisa way 9481S03‘..X41 6•...180-J..713”0 ‹...1032,2,,,r 943803204 9.16.6•242i.:.' c• ,-...c9+46tC62Q2 9645,.) 'Q '...:: , . A41 ' 25}12 140NLsenoets Aajc2oy 6 •2"3 : 9486380 ...4.37.-xu:ow,._er:c-,arCa_rrl.Cr,,S3:CY.t.GIS CXY 2'2f.Y.:4 0 IIMMIIIIIIIIIIIII n10.1)1 W01212014 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceNarne=ovmap&ClientVersion=... 10/14/2014 Map Output Page 2 of 2 Legend 0 Selected Features JC_Roads Parcels-H County Zoning MPR-SF Tracts Rural Resalont UN 1:5 Rural Resdenlal 1:10 Rural Residential 1:20 MPR Sage Famity ■ MPR-Mu adamlry NPR-Resort Complex Parks and Recreation ■ MPR.Ooen Soave ■ Rural Forest ■ Commercial Forest InhoWmg Forest 1111 Heavy industrial Airport CPF ■ MPR-Village Confer . AP1:20 . aural Visage Confer ■ Resource Rased Ind. 41 LN2M Industral fa MPR,Recreat ion '.. ■ Wade Ngnrt LPF LMR ■ LYC ■ Cmusroade-GC ■ Crossroads-CC ■ Crossroads-NC ■ AL 1:20 LICA-Urban Cdrmrarual UGA-UrbaI Light industrial UGI-MOR UGA4IOR UGA-Pueec UGA-LD UGA•Vm dor Oriented Commtercel MPR-BRH Brmnon CF.00 I RLO Commensal Forest Ninon*Resource Cheney FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Tue Oct 14 12:58:21 2014 http://gisserver/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&ClientVersion=... 10/14/2014 Parcel Details Page 1 of 2 iefferson County , . {,i., z. weai er"Statiort ,Database T« '"Maps- :r+t -Webcas _t_,,: Home County Info Departments Search Parcel Number: 948601301 SEARCH Parcel Number: 948601301 Printer Friendly Owner Mailing Address: CHRISTOPHER M GRACE 507 TAFT ST PORT TOWNSEND WA98368-4437 Site Address: 192 W FREDERICKS ST PORT TOWNSEND 98368 Section: 16 School District: Port Townsend (50) Qtr Section: SW1/4 Fre Dist: Chimacum (1) Township: 30N Tax Status: Taxable Range: 1W Tax Code: 0111 Planning area: Quimper (2) Sub Division: 9486 - EISENBEIS BAY VIEW Assessor's Land Use Code: 1900 - Cabins, Park Models, RV Utilities Property Description: EISENBEIS BAY VIEW BLK 13, LOTS 1 THRU 12 W/PTN VAC ALLEY, SOPHIA ST, & S/VAC ELWOOD ST ADJ Tax, A/V, Sales, Photos, and Permit Data Bldg Data Map Parcel Plats&Surveys Septic Monitoring Info Jeff erson %cuntyHOME I COUNTY INFO I DEPARTMENTS I SEARCH Best viewed with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 er later Windows - Mac http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/assessors/parcel/parceldetail.asp?Parcel N0=948601301 9/19/2014 PROPERTY LINE 0 I�I ".LAN' r 2 I SIDE YARD • SETBACK 7J b f rn rn / TSN A Cl " 9 —I 0 J �t1 N :I O in I I be [ e*, Z :1 ...7 IIIIMMEMEMMI U1 �t .._g,II C A 'a J r O / Oii ��/ / rn •�] O d i w u CA ` ..� /..// — :::j: _ _ _ \ \_\\\\_ I .1.� 10. -0„ GREENHOUSE — A `:I I, z (3) 24 'x 132' = q,504 SOFT p : F.• `:�A n , _ BUILDING "D" \ d :• 3 ; ' 4l'i'll \\__ _ . • rn,� AI n • rn m(.11/ (j T .*. t- .+.1 o-1 7C lt.41' ,. -,,. . ., . ii Uxi -0 — GREENHOUSE — `, 1 10. ,o r : .� aq i (3) 24'x132' = ,504 SOFT II c - — BUILDING "E" \ --4 r- :i Z is N. UI "r I31,4 \ � � � � � � � L :. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ r':•;': 2 . —' ND d o �,« g _- b --- b FIRE LANE b __ I SIDE YAW SETBACK K. „ PROPERTY LINE - 7 TT „ � nfl7 " 'O y .^ 7O � C tea ' ma, i , co , , co , . 03 i i W W (p --I ,- /Z7 ItHiflut! 0 OQ _ C3On _ On _ On _ -cam. 0 _007 n O Q n 0 O n O ❑. 'O a0 om -mN n 3 On g p � -7�. 7 i sem= . > o n2a n2 _ o_ n2 0- an2O a a - moo m Q -. Q cD Q - n n v, - 0 a, 0s ' v � = -. aa O -• y O �, to m ° n ° ttc �coAm act O C 0 O O � •• O D "S: v W000A ° caO oz • --+, c x ( O ' n] KOD n 0 cD G> > - - C 0, ?.01 D °coao Soo 0 00 ' � n O 0 ` Q0 � 00 � a 0 .< D & ay S° OO.. � m ((�� Tye 1' ➢ C%1 m a N C 7 Q n tT(1 1 O ;. '5 C. n! -0 P w *0 P. N 3 y to (0 v, N N mmon. � cc O 7 — m2 ° O D maa- ama. =5z c O N _ O � � � 3 -00 µ m0.a , Gla H p n C -• 7 c m• SS _ m 0 m c <n 7 S. W o 0• = n o 3 ql: lmfs N > DREAM CITY, LLC . Hila 07 a -1 192 W. FREDERICKS STREET I o PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 eg r' PROPERTY LINE . : • •..+.r.17*77..• a *TT.• .•417:...• .'+T+;.s . ...7":' . 0 1 °.'+ Al^' 1 Fn •I�d41�1 • „ps?jii+2iL'�, '2i...... `. .i.•r.`L ,!.2 `�.^t_:S'IL. . a•. w^+'r w a`n .'.'.'w^r•.^.'.`e,. ...,•i .•+'. 1 r I ISIDE YARD SETBACK V 4 , Z l I:, �`�`;' TA•:^+ . A il —U ..x4 i [1.4 :::::::i„)G A +./...:•;-:... n ‘_) , „, ...--L,„› „ A ...........1....! —‹rn .. � O 51 o rn \ ' ' 7 I— __ ''' '.,i_: ` + p -0,. .......:.:, , _ \ _\,_ N,_ _ _ A :.: f•: '1 �, -0„ GREENHOUSE Z •:.1e C) .00 b (3) 24'x1321 = 9,504 SOFT p ;' '::6:•11 -� BUILDING "D" d ''` rrnn ; r +:r ',1 dl 4 ::: rn 1. ,a1 7C b fi :^:^; ` _tJ .a 1 t7::::':1 >— - A u c -. r�O G ,a-0., G3ER24HOSEU BUILDN132' = q,504 SOFT( G "E" — ' h.....•.:::..1 k:: �., ,. , a. , \ \, \GREENHOUSE 1.............:.... ti :.:•:.) k:;` ' 21'-6x132' G''''= C LLC mc).A- ► 4- 3 --53 r - Carl 1' part.h CD YYr rGhi 1+ .co rr•, 4)•ep + 'moi Li-HE / 3W- loLt - %IL) S mom e v} ud (0-5-H . cors\ .),U ( 1( -2 /(T 64c ,1 i4{1 {,�� C��v^ - (c-C, Vt5t4 ) °1 )--262,,--- 0/ p- ,---9, - .7 LA71755 1 1,-*--.7 Sil1k5 j/ 1,3 L1--- Ng I _k., 6,-) \ --1, c _ bv-39- Q1-79 -0, c3i,- .eh 01 ,1 -SucrIQI f it_____ DoUJoi...---, $ A ' r ole • Dui LlisopY1--ES / 1 -H.- 1 1-7193 -Qh0) -oeG- 91G10 / s UrrIO • 1-S tnh-tc t191.1 • 00-171.3Nd 311 A113 1111VRICI