Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM041708JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH MINUTES Thursday, April 17, 2008 2:30 PM — 4:30 PM Board Members Staff Members Phil Johnson, County Commissioner District #1 Thomas Locke, MD, Health Officer David Sullivan, County Commissioner, District #2 Jean Baldwin, Public Health Services Director John Austin, Chair, County Commissioner, District #3 Julia Danskin, Nursing Services Director Chuck Russell, Hospital Commissioner District #2 Michelle Sandoval, Port Townsend City Council Sheila Westerman, Vice Chair, Citizen at large (City) Roberta Frissell, Citizen at large (County) Chair John Austin called the meeting of the Jefferson County Board of Health to order at 2:30 PM in the First Floor Conference Room of the Jefferson County Courthouse, Port Townsend. Members Present: John Austin, Roberta Frissell, Phil Johnson, Michelle Sandoval, Chuck Russell, David Sullivan, Sheila Westerman Staff Present: Jean Baldwin, Dr. Thomas Locke, M.D., Julia Danskin, Susan Porto, Sarah Murphy, Gail Bernhard (Recorder) A quorum was present. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Chair Austin recognized a motion to approve the agenda and a second. The motion to approve the agenda, as written, was passed unanimously. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF MARCH 20, 2008 Roberta Frissell noted a correction on page 5, third paragraph: It should read: "The deputy prosecutor, Mr. Alvarez, has ...." Chuck Russell pointed out that the date of the Minutes is March 20, not April 17, 2008. Member Westerman moved for approval of the minutes of March 20, as amended; the motion was seconded by Member Sullivan and approved, all in favor. PUBLIC COMMENTS Chair Austin opened up the meeting to public comment and explained the rules regarding this portion of the meeting. Kristen Marshall, Environmental Manager at Port Townsend Paper Corporation, was recognized to speak. She said she had attended the last several BOH meetings, anticipating the Washington State DOH Public Health Consultation report, and intending to hear the BOH comments on that Page 1 of l l Jefferson County Board of Health, April 7, 2008 process. Ms. Marshall said that PT Paper is involved in three public processes at this time. The first is the Public Health Consultation draft, which came out on April 8; PT Paper is reviewing it and plans to submit comments by May 8. The second is the Industrial Footprint Project through the Department of Ecology. She provided correction to certain comments from the previous BOH meeting: She said that the project is more than a carbon footprint; it is a sustainability footprint involving three categories: economic, social and environmental impacts. Health concerns and health benefits fall under the social tier of that process. If there are any health issues that are not addressed through the Health Consultation, the open format of the footprint project can allow those issues to come forward there. She said her company has begun to look at the Health Consultation, and noted that the statistics in the report do not show a statistical difference between Jefferson County and the rest of the state over the five year period studied for cancer rates, respiratory and cardiac issues. Ms. Marshall said that the report will be reviewed more thoroughly; some issues are being identified. She noted that this is a learning process for PT Paper, and the thoughts and comments of the BOH are appreciated. She requested that the Board contact her office if there are any questions. Mr. Michael Belinsky was recognized to speak. He commented on his concerns regarding adequate notice of the change of the Board of Health meeting site from 710 Harrison Street to the County Courthouse, fire code issues with the meeting room at the Health Department, and rules governing time limits for public testimony Chair Austin thanked the speakers and closed the Public Comment period. OLD BUSINESS Tobacco Prevention Efforts Julia Danskin reported that Karen Obermeyer had been working with the Health Department as Prevention Specialist since September on the Tobacco Prevention Program. Ms. Obermeyer has been working with Jefferson Health Care on the Quit Line and the Tobacco Prevention programs that can be implemented by nursing staff. She has commended the Hospital on their smoke-free campus program. She has also been working with success at Port Townsend High School on the TATU, Teens Against Tobacco Use program. Additionally, she has been promoting the Washington State Quit Line throughout the community. The Board was encouraged to refer any businesses or organizations with interest in an employee quit smoking program to contact Ms. Obermeyer or Ms. Danskin for assistance. She said the department wishes to support the community in efforts to cease smoking and not start smoking. The hospital is offering a free smoking cessation class that will run from April 16 to May 28. More information can be obtained from Jefferson Health Care or the Health Department. Jefferson County Restaurant Awards Sarah Murphy reported that the Outstanding Achievement Awards for restaurants had been announced in the newspaper the week prior. The awards are given according to criteria developed by the Food Service Advisory Committee: inspection scores; preparation and sale of complex food; same owner for at least one year; responsiveness to correcting violations; cleanliness and attention to detail. Chair Austin asked if there were any restaurants that did not Page 2 of 11 Jefferson County Board of Health, April 7, 2008 pass muster. Ms. Murphy said that about half of the eligible restaurants did not receive the award. She verified that no establishments had been closed for health violations recently. NEW BUSINESS Public Health Heroes Julia Danskin reported that in honor of National Public Health Week (April 6-12), awards were given for local Public Health Heroes. Nominations were requested from the community in March. Four awards were announced last week, and two winners were present at the BOH Meeting to receive them: Dennis Crawford and Jill Buehler. Julia Danskin read a citation for Dennis Crawford and his work in Emergency Management as Disaster Preparedness Education and Outreach Coordinator. Mr. Crawford has worked to create over ten separate emergency community groups that focus on different aspects of emergency preparedness. He also works with Local 20/20 Emergency Preparedness Action Committee and Disaster Animal Welfare Group (DAWG). He has greatly helped Bob Hamlin, Program Manager, with preparing the community for emergency conditions. Mr. Crawford has worked at the grass roots level and has started 144 neighborhood emergency preparedness groups in Jefferson County. He is credited with being a highly dedicated and effective leader. Julia presented the Public Health Hero to Mr. Crawford on behalf of the community. For more than 10 years, Jill Buehler was an outstanding, contributing member of the Jefferson County Board of Health. She was a dedicated and involved Board member who could look at a problem from many angles and fully participated in problem solving. She has led a vision that our public health department and public hospital share: the need to coordinate services, know the needs of citizens and work together. She has a positive attitude and faces challenges with a can do attitude. Jill serves as a liaison between the Board of Health and Jefferson Health Care where she is an elected Hospital Commissioner. She helped clarify the mission and services of the respective public agencies to both Boards. She fostered a number of cooperative projects and recognizes strengths of both organizations. The health of the citizens of Jefferson County has been enhanced and served by her efforts for many years. Julia Danskin presented Ms. Buehler with the Public Health Hero award on behalf of the community. Since the other two award recipients were unable to be present at this meeting, they will be honored at a future meeting. Port Townsend Paper Mill Health Consultation Report Dr. Locke noted that the document had been in draft form for about three months. He said it had undergone several revisions and was improved with each draft. He said the statistics in the current report have gone through careful review and represent the best available information on the respective health measures. The format is fairly standardized. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry is the principle federal agency for human health impacts of environmental contaminants. In most states they contract with the state Department of Health to perform specific evaluations. These evaluations review the known information about the specific area of concern: e.g. the health Page 3 of 11 Jefferson County Board of Health, April 7, 2008 effects from air pollution in general or a specific source of industrial air pollution. The report that is before the Board compiles known facts about emissions in Port Townsend statistics and available health statistics that might be connected to air pollution. Dr. Locke said that reports like this often raise more questions than they answer. He explained that determining specific health impacts is very expensive and sometimes impossible. For example, to relate cancer studies and air pollution there is a need for very precise information about duration and severity of exposure to specific contaminants. Modern populations tend to reside in many locations throughout their lives and are therefore exposed to many different environments. Lifetime exposure to carcinogens is extremely complex and it may not be possible to determine all relevant data. Environmentally -induced cancer can occur as long as 40 years after the exposure making it very difficult to research. These reports attempt to assemble available information and present it in a factual way. He pointed out that there are no precise measurements of what is being released. The law requires that the emitters of industrial air pollutants specify the maximum amount that would be emitted. As the report points out, industries tend to estimate high, because there is a penalty for emitting more than the threshold but no penalty for underestimating pollution. Measuring what leaves the stack on a daily basis is seldom done. The only public monitoring station as relates to air quality in Port Townsend is a monitoring station located at the Blue Heron School. Commissioner Johnson said that location was chosen because of the wood burning stove emissions that tend to hang in the valley. Dr. Locke said that the state Olympic Region Clean Air Agency (ORCAA) is responsible for monitoring and enforcing particulate matter guidelines. Dr. Locke said it is not his intention to walk through the document in any detail. He said it raises a number of questions that would require considerably more information. He noted that Jefferson County Public Health staff made some specific recommendations and they were incorporated in the report. Regarding health effects, the starting point is good air quality data. One wants to know what is in the air and its relationship to what is legally permitted. If it is in excess of the permitted level, there is a clear legal remedy. If what is emitted does not exceed the limits, the process for reducing emissions is much more complicated and involves changes of state and federal law. Minimizing human health impacts can be done in a number of ways. He discussed the need to know age groups, distribution in the community, and factors that increase/decrease exposure. Computer models can take in prevailing wind currents and weather patterns and predict exposure levels. Hospitalization and death rates are not good measures for air quality. Dr. Locke mentioned an asthma study in Port Angeles where asthmatic children and their parents were asked to maintain diaries of their asthma activity which were then correlated with mill emissions and meteorological data. The study technique was developed at Harvard University. He noted that it is very difficult to establish a cause and effect relationship between air pollution and specific health effects. Dr. Locke said the data on death rates is similar to age adjusted rates for the state. He pointed out that hospitalization rates for ischemic heart disease and for lower respiratory tract disease (for one year) was statistically higher in Jefferson County compared to Washington States. Page 4 of 11 Jefferson County Board of Health, April 7, 2008 He noted that some cancer rates that are not normally associated with air pollution are relatively common in Jefferson County, such as prostate cancer. Even factoring in the age composition, prostate cancer rates are significantly higher in Jefferson County than elsewhere in the state, but the death rate is not any higher. It is possible that this is due to better access to health care and appropriate screening for prostate cancer. Early detection of prostate cancer increases cancer rates but also promotes better treatment outcomes. With regard to ischemic heart disease and lower respiratory disease, the data is insufficient to analyze more deeply. Dr. Locke cited several possible explanations/interpretations such as better access to hospital care, or that the threshold for admissions to rule out heart disease is lower, or actual higher rates. Member Westerman referred to page 27, Public Health Action Plan and read the section. She asked what the difference is between collecting air emissions data and air monitoring. She also asked for clarification of the phrase: "the best locations to establish air monitoring". Dr. Locke said that in his interpretation, the report recommends setting up one or more monitoring stations that can analyze periodic air quality samples. Picking appropriate sites begins with a preliminary analysis that can include vacuum bottle samples taken in locations where air quality concerns have been reported. Another method is to site monitoring stations based on meteorological predictions of air currents. Ms. Westerman summarized her understanding by saying that there are three types of activities that could be done over time: collecting, monitoring and modeling. She said that this was a very good report, but it does not mention anything about funding mechanisms and this was a concern to her. Dr. Locke said that the regulatory responsibility typically lies with the Department of Ecology. They are responsible for data collection, analysis and ongoing monitoring. Health assessments are the role of the Department of Health and involve considerable interpretation of the data. The DOE work is paid for by industry taxes and permit fees. Ms. Westerman asked where our particular situation might fall in terms of Ecology's priorities. Jean Baldwin explained the process. After the Department of Health releases the draft report, they may or may not hold public hearings, depending on public comment/reaction. The Department of Ecology has already started the Footprint project; it is led by the same person who is responsible for permitting and emissions, and works with ORCAA around air monitoring. Ms. Baldwin said the priority will likely be based on the Carbon Footprint project and air monitoring outcomes. She said it would not be entirely based on this Health Consultation and will involve a larger community process which is not predictable at this time. Ms. Westerman asked how the report would be disseminated to the public. Ms. Baldwin said that the report has been sent to the libraries, to the Air Watchers group, to the newspapers via press releases; it will be placed on the Department of Health website. Dr. Locke said that although he does not know what priority Ecology will assign, that tends to be based on the level of concern expressed by the public. Board member Russell said that paper products will still be produced somewhere in the world, if not here locally. The result would be more pollution, not less, and he believes it better to keep this mill operating, with appropriate controls. Page 5 of 11 Jefferson County Board of Health, April 7, 2008 Dr. Locke noted that air quality involves not just industrial emissions, but also auto emissions, household and business chemicals, etc. The air is shared by all and contaminated by all. A community program to improve air quality should address all the inputs. Member Johnson mentioned that he had learned about the reason for selection of the Blue Heron monitoring station in his work with ORCAA. There was further discussion about the great complexity of the issues and the extreme difficulty of effective modeling considering local/regional weather patterns, air currents and the myriad of factors involved. Meth Action Team White Paper Ann Winegar is Program Manager for the Jefferson County Community Group and consultant to Jefferson County Public Health working on methamphetamine prevention, education and outreach. In addition, she is the convener of the Jefferson County Meth Action Team. She presented the final draft version of the "Methamphetamine in Jefferson County" white paper. The paper has been developed by the members of the Meth Action Team (MAT), all listed within the document. Ms. Winegar explained the extent of the meth use problem for this community. She noted that this is every person's problem, if only by virtue of its cost to taxpayers and to major health, legal, school and law enforcement agencies. The purpose of the document is to increase community awareness, and provide information and guidance about methamphetamine use/abuse in Jefferson County to the BOH, BOCC and City Council for future policy decisions. Ms. Winegar called attention to the graphs included in the packet, which highlight some of the statistical information about meth use currently in the county. Member Sullivan commended the Team on the report. He said the one thing he would add (under Treatment, page 6) would be the local funding provided by the County and recent state. This would help people understand the impact locally. Jean Baldwin noted that the MAT (Meth Action Team) had been getting ready to disband and resume Substance Abuse Committee work. At the same time, meth treatment money was coming from the State Office of Financial Management (OFM). MAT decided to write a summary of the work done and recommendations for the staff treatment money. The first year of OFM money ends June 30; there is will be one more year of funding; renewal for the next biennium is uncertain. The funds are to treat 12 individuals for 8 months. Ms. Winegar said the treatment has already started and the mental health component will begin within the next week. She said she had been meeting with Jefferson Mental Health and Safe Harbor about the implementation, and was very encouraged by the progress and process. Member Sullivan noted that the extra $100,000 for three years was an incentive for the County to adopt the 1/10`" of 1% sales tax and thanked Ms. Winegar for her efforts. Member Sandoval referred to the summary statistics, inquiring whether they included all of Jefferson County, including Port Townsend. The statistics do include the City and its schools, Page 6 of I I Jefferson County Board of Health, April 7, 2008 although the Port Townsend School District is not participating on the MAT. The background of the Team and funding was reviewed briefly. Member Westerman pointed out a textual repetition on page 6 under Impact on the Legal System. Referring to the list of addictive substances on page 7, she also expressed her hope that these education and treatment programs would not simply lump all drugs together. She noted the potential loss of credibility that can result. Member Johnson added that when he attended a National Association of Counties meeting in Washington, D.C. two years ago, they did distinguish among drugs and methamphetamine was the number one issue for virtually every county in the nation. Ms. Winegar said that it is also the number one fear, particularly for law enforcement agencies. Chair Austin called attention to the first bullet under the Legal System on page 6. He asked if the dollar amounts cited were correct and what costs it is referring to. Ms. Winegar said she would follow up on those questions. Draft DEC (Drug Endangered Children) Document Ms. Winegar next discussed this document, which is in early draft form and has not yet been permanently titled. She explained that both this and the Meth white paper are collaborative efforts of many view points. While still in process, there have been sign offs from Law Enforcement, Child Protective Services, Public Health and the Prosecutor's Office. Medical Response Recommendation, page 4, is the final item to be developed. She said that currently there is a chain of custody protocol which is being reviewed for improvements with Jefferson Health Care and law enforcement representatives. Quen Zorrah provided her perspective. She noted that for many years, the problem of drug endangered children was not fully acknowledged. She noted that it has taken time for the community to understand and define what a drug endangered child is and the extent of the problem in this county. She said collaboration among many agencies and organizations has increased as a result of this project and in efforts to meet the increasing complexity and intensity of needs of families. She stated that despite the coordination and collaboration, the problem is not going away. More funding is needed to actually implement plans and take necessary actions. Ms. Zorrah noted the importance of the chain of custody protocol. Ms. Zorrah said that this work of the MAT had started when the focus was on meth labs. Since that time, the problem has shifted away from the safety and environmental issues of meth labs to children and families exposed to continuing drug use. The consequences of direct drug exposure and severe neglect are now better understood. She said that this community, despite its small size, has done amazing work, and more quickly than many other parts of the state. Member Sullivan added that denial plays a large role in this issue. He said that in doing interventions and getting people into treatment, he has often found that the child has been the most powerful person once they were heard. He also noted the abuse cycles that start in childhood. Ms. Zorrah agreed that wanting their children to escape the addiction cycle is a powerful motivator for parents to seek or accept treatment. Page 7 of 11 Jefferson County Board of Health, April 7, 2008 Our Kids: Our Business Ann Winegar reported on the local programs that are part of National Child Abuse Prevention and Sexual Assault Awareness month. Packet handouts include a description of the campaign, a list of sponsors and the range of associated activities for the month of April, as well as Call to Action leaflets and Business pledge sheets. Ms. Winegar mentioned that many organizations, such as The Leader and Jefferson County Parks and Recreation, are doing wonderful publicity and outreach efforts. She gave credit to Kelly Matlock for her vision in bringing this idea to the fore. The original group decided to start small and then grow the program annually. However, many other organizations would have wished to be included at the outset. She said that the 'principles before personalities' ethic has been clearly demonstrated. Additional ads and articles will appear in the Leader throughout April. Although the emphasis has been on prevention, the program will also honor survivors of child abuse and neglect with a candlelight vigil at Haller Fountain on April 27. Members Sandoval and Westerman, who had both attended the Compassion/Dalai Lama event in Seattle, shared related highlights. Chair Austin mentioned the excellent document that had been distributed at the Town Meeting, which gives guidance on what to say if/when you observe a parent who appears to be abusing or neglecting a child. Ms. Winegar said that information will be published in the Leader and appear on the Public Health web site. She said the information is also appearing on the Food Coop and Jefferson County Public Safety Network websites. The campaign costs have been extremely low — about $2500 for 20 weeks of ads and thousands of pinwheels, etc. — thanks to community contributions and discounts. Protocol for Responding to Public Meeting Disruptions Chair Austin recalled that at a previous meeting there had been a request for a protocol for responding to public meeting disruptions. At that time, he had promised to consider what he could do as Chair. He had then drafted a statement to be read at each meeting. He said this is not a formal protocol, but is what he plans to do as Chair. He will read the introduction to the public as he did prior to the Public Comment portion of the meeting on this date. He said he did not think it necessary to remind the public each time that disruptions will lead to certain responses. However, if it appears to be necessary, in his judgment as Chair, he will read the statement that a disruption of this meeting constitutes disorderly conduct and is a misdemeanor, and persons causing a disruption will be asked to leave — based on RCW 84.030. Member Westerman asked whether the statement would be read after the disruption had occurred; he indicated that was the case. If the person(s) are asked to leave and do not, Courthouse Security will be called upon to assist. Member Westerman, who is Vice Chair, said she wished to use the same procedure and desired clarification on the following points. She questioned whether it is necessary to include "Please confine your comments to issues that pertain to public health". She pointed out that the BOH also deals with environmental health issues. She said she is willing to read this whole statement, but she would like to say that we ask that statements are civil, and not delineate what is not considered civil. Chair Austin said he could accept that. Member Frissell suggested that the Chair (or Vice Chair) also state that the Board is not going to respond to public comments. Member Johnson said that the BOCC states Page 8 of 11 Jefferson County Board of Health, April 7, 2008 that they typically won't respond to public comments. Member Sullivan noted that it is also not the time to ask questions, that there are other venues for that. Jean Baldwin said she wished to verify that the ordinance adopted for courthouse behavior only applies to the BOCC; Commissioners said that is the case. Chair Austin said the protocol under discussion for the BOH is from the RCW for public meetings. There was a brief discussion regarding the need to limit comments to the topic of public health. Member Westerman said she did not wish to monitor and enforce the appropriateness of every comment. Chair Austin agreed that she would not need to do so. Jean Baldwin asked whether the statement should be printed on the meeting agenda. Chair Austin said that would be helpful, and noted that he had added the word typically, as suggested. Member Frissell said she wished to address the apparent confusion about meeting venue changes. She said she had seen the announcement in the newspaper twice before receiving the meeting packet. She suggested that perhaps when the meeting is not being held at the Health Department, a notice should be posted there the day of the meeting indicating the location of the meeting. Jean Baldwin said that the notice of adjournment had been posted at the Courthouse and at the Health Department, but not at Pope Marine because of the notice in the paper. Member Westerman said it was especially important to post if the meeting location is changed. Ms. Baldwin confirmed that a notice was posted at the Fire Hall on April 17. She added that this venue (First Floor Conference Room, Courthouse) may be the permanent location. ACTIVITY UPDATE Public Health Standards Review — The Department is undergoing a 3 -year review by the State as to compliance with 12 public health standards. The review covers communicable disease, food safety, and maternal/child health. The Health Department will be rated along with every other health department in the State. Reviewers will be on site for one day. Julia Danskin is leading a team in preparation for the visit. She mentioned that as a small county, Jefferson has not had the infrastructure and funds to maintain every aspect up to the level that would be desired. She said that the funding for Emergency Preparedness has been of considerable help in related areas. She said they had done very well six years ago with Assessment, but ratings dropped three years ago due to the loss of various sources of funds. Jean Baldwin said that it is similar to performance standards, but it involves testing a whole state wide system. The State Department of Health does not fund for many of the things they are testing, i.e. it is not tied to their money. Funding is all from local dollars. Jean Baldwin noted the inherent challenge of ensuring state-wide standards when many local systems receive no state funding. This entire process is the attempt to establish a common infrastructure across the state. However, the measurement process can be onerous. Dr. Locke said that the department had gone through identical audits in 2002 and 2005, and the comparison over the three year period was informative. The current audit is structured differently and focuses on a subset of an expanded set of standards, so that direct comparison with 2002 and 2005 assessments will not be possible. Infrastructure standards such as methods of contracting and business management will be measured across the state. For other areas, Page 9 of 11 Jefferson County Board of Health, April 7, 2008 various counties will be measured for different combinations of standards. Dr. Locke said that the most useful comparison of this data is to measure the department's own performance, strengths and weaknesses over time. Home Owner Inspection Data — Dr. Locke said that data from other counties is being collected. Clallam County is scheduled to attend the May BOH meeting to make a presentation. The Clallam Work Group has just completed new documents on site certification and home owner inspection. AGENDA PLANNING Member Westerman suggested that the Homeowner Inspection presentation be scheduled at a different meeting from the Royer Report to allow sufficient time for full discussion. After a brief discussion, it was agreed that the Clallam Work Group presentation would be postponed. Jean Baldwin said she would also like to schedule a School Based Clinic briefing soon. The hope is to begin the program for the 2008-2009 school term, so action would be needed in the near future. NEXT SCHEDULED MEETING The next BOH meeting will be held Thursday, May 15 from 2:30 to 4:30 PM in the Courthouse, First Floor Conference Room. ADJOURNMENT Member Johnson moved to adjourn and Member Westerman seconded, with all in favor. The meeting was adjourned at 4:29 PM. Page 10 of II Jefferson County Board of Health, April 7, 2008 JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH Robert& ell, Member Phil Jo on, Member Michelle Sandoval, Member Sheila Westerman, Vice Chair U 40* Chuck Russell, Member David Sullivan, Member Page 11 of I1 Jefferson County Board of Health, April 7, 2008