HomeMy WebLinkAbout032116_ca11Department of Public Works
O Consent Agenda
Page 1 of 1
Jefferson County Board of Commissioners
Consent Agenda Request
To: Board of Commissioners
Philip Morley, County Administrator
From: Monte Reinders P.E., Public Works Director/ County Engineer/Y
Agenda Date: March 21, 2016
Subject: Digital Submittal Certification - County Road Administration Board -
Reports for 2015
Statement of Issue:
The County Road Administration Board (CRAB) requires the periodic submittal of forms and
documents related to Jefferson County's management of its road system and road fund. By
April 1, 2016, the County must submit the following in digital format: (1) Traffic Law
Enforcement Expenditure Certification, (2) Fish Passage Barrier Removal Certification, (3)
Annual Certification (with attachments), (4) Annual Construction Report, (5) County Arterial
Preservation Report, and (6) Maintenance Management Certification. The first three of these
items, (See Attached), requires the certification of the Chair of the Board of Commissioners
via signatures on a "Digital Submittal Certification" form for mailing to CRAB.
Analysis / Strategic Goals / Pros Et Cons:
CRAB establishes Standards of Good Practice for the administration of the County roads
program and road fund. CRAB monitors compliance with these standards via the County's
regular submittal of data and certifications. The County Engineer and Board of Commissioners
must certify that required standards are being met. Annual issuance of a "Certificate of Good
Practice" from CRAB is required in order for the County to receive its annual Motor Vehicle
Fuel Tax allocation.
Fiscal Impact/Cost Benefit Analysis:
Public Works has prepared the required documents with assistance from the Auditor's office
and the Sheriff's office. The Certificate of Good Practice is required to receive Jefferson
County's annual allocation of approximately $1.3 million in Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax.
Recommendation:
Authorize the Chair to sign and date the "Digital Submittal Certification" form in the two
places for the signature of "Chair / Executive." Return to Public Works for processing
Department Contact:
Monte Reinders P.E., Public Works Director/County Engineer
385-9242
v
hilip , County Administ for Date
DIGITAL SUBMITTAL CERTIFICATION- COUNTY ROAD ADMINISTRATION BOARS
REPORTS FOR 2015
County # 16
Required Submittal Date:
County Name
April 1, 2016
JEFFERSON
The County Engineer checks each box, confirming the forms have been certified by the listed
signatures and submitted to and accepted by the County Road Administration Board, then
sends this completed form to CRAB via regular mail.
********************************************
❑ Traffic Law Enforcement Certification 2015
(Engineer Check)
I hereby certify that the ab a report is true and accurate and that I have reviewed and approved the report for submission
to the County Road Admi s ration Board in accordant with WAC 136
z 1111c.
_County Sheriffate
County Auditor Date
Chair / Executive Date
********************************************
F] Fish Passage Barrier Removal Certification 2015
(Engineer Check)
❑ Annual Certification 2015
(Engineer Check)
I hereby certify that the Fish Passage Barrier Removal and Annual Certifications are true and accurate and that I have
reviewed and approved the report for submission to the County Road Administration Board in accordance with WAC 136.
Chai Iver Da e
a /
66�y Eng neer: Date
********************************************
dAnnual Construction Report for 2015
(Engineer Check)
E� County Arterial Preservation Report for 2015
(Engineer Ch
EF )
Maintenance Management Cert. for 2015
(Engineer Check)
I hereby certify that the Annual Construction Report, CAPP Report, and Maintenance Management Certification are true
and accurate and that I have reviewed and approved the report for submission to the County Road Administration Board in
accordance with WAC 136.
/S`—
— 3 //� I -
y Engineer: Da
101116EngrCertforApr.x1s
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY ROAD ADMINISTRATION BOARD
RURAL ARTERIAL PROGRAM
CERTIFICATION OF ROAD FUND EXPENDITURES FOR TRAFFIC LAW ENFORCEMENT
WAC 136-150-022
Submitting County: JEFFERSON
Total Road Levy:
Budgeted Road Levy revenue (as listed on the Road Levy
Certification - WAC 136-150-021)
Actual Road Levy revenue produced:
Traffic Law Enforcement Paid by Road Levv Diversion:
Budgeted Road Levy Diversion (as listed on the Road
Levy Certification - WAC 136-150-021)
Actual amount of Diverted Road Levy:
Was Diverted Road Levy deposited in a specific and
identifiable account (RCW 36.82.040)?
Traffic Law Enforcement Paid by Budgeted Road Fund Expenditures:
Budgeted cost reimbursements and/or operating transfers
from the Road Fund:
Actual total amount of cost reimbursements and/or
operating transfers from the Road Fund:
Total Road Portion Traffic Law Enforcement Expenditures:
Budget Year: 2015
$ 4,199, 333.86
----------------------------------------
$ 4,201,688.52
----------------------------------------
$ 720,000.00
----------------------------------------
$ 720,000.00
----------------------------------------
(Yes --- No --- NIA) YES
$ -
----------------------------------------
$ -
----------------------------------------
$ 720,000.00
Total Traffic Law Enforcement Expense (ALL COUNTY FUNDS): $
840, 349.37
RCW 36.79.140 provides that only those counties that during the preceding twelve months have
spent all revenues collected for road purposes only for such purposes, including traffic law
enforcement, as are allowed by Article II, Section 40 of the Washington State Constitution, are
eligible to receive funds from the Rural Arterial Trust Account.
This form must be reviewed and certified (on the "Engineer's Certification Form") by:
County Sheriff
County Auditor OR Charter designated Chief Financial Officer
Chair, Board of County Commissioiners OR County Executive
Due Date: April 1, 2016
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
WASHINGTON STATE
COUNTY ROAD ADMINISTRATION BOARD
Certification of Road Fund Expenditures for Fish Passage Barrier Removal
Submitting County
Fish Passage Barrier Removal Proiects:
Project Name:
Donkey Creek - Clearwater Rd
W. Uncas Rd Culvert
JEFFERSON Budget Year: 2015
WAC 136-150-023 Due Date: April 1, 2016
Cost for Work % of
Outside of County Total
Total Cost: Right -of -Way: Cost:
$ 67,499.38 0%
$ 69,980.52 0%
Attach additional sheets if more space is needed.
Total Expenditures for Fish Passage Barrier Removal Outside County Rights -of -Way
Total Annual Road Construction Budget
1/2 % of Total Annual Road
(Limit of "Outside of Right of Way" expense.)
Total Expenditure for Fish Passage Barrier Removal Outside County Right -of -Way
$ 5,343,211.00
X 0.005
= C 7R 71 R nr
$0.00
RCW 36.79.140 provides that only those counties that during the preceding twelve months have spent all revenues
collected for road purposes only for such purposes, including removal of barriers to fish passage and accompanying
streambed and stream bank repair as specified and limited by RCW 36.82.070, as are allowed by Article II, Section 40
of the Washington State Constitution, are eligible to receive funds from the Rural Arterial Trust Account.
1
160112 Fish PassageCert.xls
JEFFERSON COUNTY
ANNUAL CERTIFICATION FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2015
(WAC 136-04)
MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION (if the answer to any question except "B" is No, please attach an explanation.)
A.
During 2015 the County Engineer performed the duties and had the responsibilities specified
X Yes
No
in RCW 36.80.030.
B.
At any time during 2015 was there a vacancy in the position of county
Engineer?
Yes X
No
If so, were the procedures in WAC 136-12 followed?
Yes
No
C.
The processing of County Road Accident Reports during 2015 complied with WAC 136-28.
X Yes
No
D.
Priority Programming techniques were applied to the ranking of all potential projects on the
X Yes
No
arterial road system in 2015 per WAC 136-14-020.
E.
As of December 31, 2015 the management of the county road department was in accordance with policies
set by the county legislative authority including, but not limited to, the following specific policies
required by WAC 136-50-050:
POLICY WAC DATE OF CURRENT VERSION
Re: Organization 136-50-051
11-OCt-04
Re: Personnel Practices 136-50-052
15 -Dec -03
Re: Complaint Handling 136-50-053
28 -Jul -03
Re: Work for Others 136-50-054
8 -Jan -01
Re: Utility Accommodation 136-50-055
8 -Jan -00
Re: Priority Programming 136-14-030
23 -Apr -03
F.
The following were submitted to CRAB in a timely manner:
DATE OF
DATE SENT TO
ADOPTION/
CRAB
DOCUMENT WAC DUE DATE
PREPARATION
'15
Six -Year Program 136-15-050 31 -Dec -14
15 -Sep -14
18 -Dec -14
'15
Annual Construction Program 136-16-040 31 -Dec -14
8 -Dec -14
18 -Dec -14
'15
CAPP Program 136-300-060 31 -Dec -14
8 -Dec -14
18 -Dec -14
'15
Road Fund Budget 31 -Dec -14
8 -Dec -14
18-DeC-14
'15
Maint Mgmt Wrk Pin & Budget 136-11-040 31 -Dec -14
8 -Dec -14
18 -Dec -14
'15
Road Levy Certification 136-150-021 01 -Feb -15
2 -Feb -15
22 -Jan -15
'14
Certification of Road Fund Exp. 136-150-022 01 -Apr -15
16 -Mar -15
20 -Mar -15
For Traffic Law Enforcement
'14
Engineer's Certification of Fish 136-150-023 01 -Apr -15
16 -Mar -15
20 -Mar -15
Barrier Removal Costs
'14
Annual Construction Report 136-16-050 01 -Apr -15
16 -Mar -15
20 -Mar -15
'14
CAPP Report 136-300-090 01 -Apr -15
16 -Mar -15
20 -Mar -15
'14
Maint Mgmt Certification 136-11-050 01 -Apr -15
16 -Mar -15
20 -Mar -15
'14
Annual Certification 136-04-030 01 -Apr -15
16 -Mar -15
20-Mall5
'14
Road Log Update 136-60-030 01 -May -15
23 -Apr -15
23 -Apr -15
'15
PMS Certification for CAPA 136-70-070 31 -Dec -15
16 -Dec -15
17 -Dec -15
Eligibility.
OPERATIONS
G. Projects to which construction expenditures were charged were all on the originally adopted 2015 Annual Yes X No
Program or as amended per WAC 136-16-042 - Attach Amendments. (If No, please attach a brief explanation.)
H. The County's construction by county forces limit for 2015 computed in accordance with RCW 36.77.065: $ 1,261,950.00
I. The actual expenditure for construction by county forces as reported in the 2015 Annual Const. Report: S
J. A written report of bridge inspection findings was furnished to the legislative authority on: September 01, 2015
as required by WAC 136-20-060. (Please attach a copy)
EMAIL WITH ATTACHMENTS TO THE COUNTY ROAD
ADMINISTRATION BOARD NO LATER THAN APRIL 1, 2016
Must be followed by signed "County Certification" form via regular mail
Jefferson County
Department of Public Works
623 Sheridan St.
Port Townsend, WA 98368
(360) 385-9160
Monte Reinoens P.E.
Public Works Director/County Engineer
Memorandum
To: County Road Administration Board
From: Monte Reinders, P.E., County Engineer/Public Works Director l,�
Date: March 15, 2016
Re: Explanation for Item G on the Annual Certification for Calendar Year 2015
In response to item "G" under the Operations category on the Annual Certification for Calendar
Year 2015, two projects were added to the 2015 Annual Construction Program, carried over
from the 2013 and 2014 Annual Construction Program.
• CR 18812 Queets Bridge Painting (08391000) Clearwater Rd —This project was listed on
the 2013 Annual Construction Program but had roll over costs in 2014 and 2015.
• CR 18962 Access Preservation Hoh Rain Forrest Olympic National Park MP6.95 - This
sub -project was inadvertently left off the 2015 Annual Construction Program. It is one of
three that comprise one larger grant funded project. This project was included in the
2014 Annual Construction Program.
[End]
MEMORANDUM
TO: Board of County Commissioners
Jefferson County
Department of Public Works
623 Sheridan St.
Port Townsend, WA 98368 -
(360) 385-9160
Monte Rernders, P.E.
Public Works Director/County Engineer
FROM: Monte Remders, P E, Public Works Director/County Engineer
DATE: September 1, 2015
SUBJECT: Bridge Condition Report 2015
INTRODUCTION
As required by WAC 136-20-060, each county engineer shall furnish the county legislative
authonty with a written resume of the findings of the bridge inspection effort This resume shall
be made available to said authority and shall be consulted during the preparation of the proposed
six-year transportation program revision The resume shall include the county engineer's
recommendations as to replacement, repair or load restriction for each deficient bridge The
resolution of adoption of the six-year transportation program shall include assurances to the effect
that the county engineer's report with respect to deficient bridges was available to said authority
during the preparation of the program
BRIDGE INVENTORY
Jefferson County Public Works has 31 active bridges — see the attached Master Bridge List
(Appendix A) for a listing of the county bridges Jefferson County also has two permanently
closed bridges, which are not listed on the Master Bridge List
BRIDGE INSPECTIONS
The National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS) and WAC 136-20-030 mandate that public
agencies inspect and report on all bridges at least once every two years (routine inspection)
Jefferson County staff performs all routine inspections Special inspections are required for
bridges that cannot be inspected adequately from the ground For these bridges an Under -Bridge
Bridge Condition Report 2015 Page i of 3
Inspection Truck (UBIT) is required Steel bridges with fracture critical members may also
require special inspections with the UBIT and/or other special equipment Jefferson County has
two bridges which require the UBIT inspection and one bridge which requires both the UBIT
and the fracture critical inspection (identified in the attached Master Bridge List) Jefferson
County currently has a contract with the Washington State Department of Transportation
(WSDOT) to perform these inspections
Jefferson County Public Works has split up the bridge inspections so that East Jefferson County
bridges are inspected in odd -numbered years and West Jefferson County bridges are inspected in
even -numbered years. In conformance with that schedule, Jefferson County completed the
biennial inspections for all East Jefferson County bridges in 2015 The inspection reports were
submitted to WSDOT, which then verifies compliance with the NBIS and reports to the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA)
DEFICIENT BRIDGES
All bridges are assigned a sufficiency rating (SR), which is a calculated score based on numbers
assigned to all of the bridge elements reviewed by the bridge inspector The SR is a number
from 0 to 100, with 100 being an entirely sufficient bridge, and 0 being an entirely insufficient or
deficient bridge For additional explanation of the sufficiency rating and other ratings see the
attached WSDOT publication, Bridges and Structures — Ratings (Appendix B) The sufficiency
rating is used to determine if a bridge is eligible for federal rehabilitation or replacement funding
Currently, none of the county's bridges have any major deficiencies, and none are eligible for
rehabilitation or replacement
As described in previous Bridge Condition reports, Tower Creek Bridge is being monitored for
potential scour problems associated with down -cutting of the streambed The Tower Creek
streambed expenenced significant down -cutting in 2007-2008 due to migration of the Hoh River
and heavy flows in Tower Creek However, based on regular monitoring, the streambed
elevation has been relatively stable since 2008 Public Works will continue to monitor this
situation
POSTED BRIDGES
All bridges are required to have a "Load Rating" calculation The Load Rating establishes how
much weight the bridge can carry for several standard configurations of vehicle axle loads If the
load rating calculation shows that a bridge cannot safely cant' the legal traffic loads then the
bridge must posted with the appropriate load limits Jefferson County currently does not have
any bridges with load restrictions The load rating values (in tons) are listed on the attached
Master Bridge List (Appendix A)
OBSOLETE BRIDGES
The Old Little Quilcene Bridge and the Maple Creek Bridge have been placed in obsolete status
and removed from the Master Bridge List Both are permanently closed to vehicular traffic
This action removes the requirement for biennial bridge inspection
Bridge Condition Report 2015 Page 2 of 3
EMERGENCY REPAIRS AND INSPECTIONS
There have not been any emergency repairs or inspections since the last Bridge Condition Report
in 2013
MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES
Routine maintenance of the county's bridges is conducted by the road maintenance department
Typical routine maintenance consists of deck cleaning, brush clearing, and minor miscellaneous
repairs
COMPLETED PROJECTS
Public Works applied for and received federal funding to repaint the Queets Bridge, which spans
the Queets River on Clearwater Road The painting project was completed successfully in
December 2013 It was 100% funded by the Federal Highway Administration
A new bridge was added to the system in 2014 At Andrews Creek on Snow Creek Road at mile
post 3 78, a 24 ft span, pre -cast, reinforced concrete three -sided structure was constructed This
project convected a fish -passage barrier, and replaced a pair of deteriorated culverts The project
was funded with 100% funding from the Federal Highway Administration
The Hell Roaring Creek Bridge on the Upper Hoh Road was repaired by reattaching the steel
angle armor on the southerly end of the bridge
CURRENT PROJECTS
Current projects include the following
• A 21 ft span, pre -cast, reinforced concrete three -sided structure at Upper Hoh Road MP
6 95 The contract bid documents are complete The protect is scheduled to be
advertised to bidders in January, 2016 and be constructed in summer 2016 This project
is 100% funded by the Federal Highway Administration
• An 80 foot span bridge on West Uncas Rd MP 0 804 is designed Funding for
construction is being sought through the Recreation and Conservation Office
PROGRAMMED PROJECTS
There are no programmed bridge projects at this time
RECOMMENDED PROJECTS
There are no recommended bridge projects at this time
Bridge Condition Report 2015 Page 3 of 3
APPENDIX A
Jefferson County Public Works
Master Bridge List
LAST UPDATED 9/2/15
Total number of bridges in inventory
Total number of permanently closed bridges
Total number of active bridges
Total number of West Jefferson County bridges
Total number of East Jefferson County Bridges
31
31
18 active bridges
1 permanently closed bridge
13 active bridges
1 permanently closed bridge
Last Lrvtatwt crcnnty
Jefferson County Public Works
Master Bridge List
East Jefferson County
m
O0
�
z
L
F
z
m
—
F�
<
L
V
92
U U
z N
U
Ix
BRIDGE TYPE
U
w
-i
z
,
F: 0 p
m
e
W
m
F
<
U
cc
p
<
<
W
C
-
-yi
U
U
U<<
C9F-
z
z
O
x
O
.�
U
3
Oa.
O
FZ^,
a
iZ.i p
Y
p
£
<
<
<
c
Uz
<
w
O
<
°C
U
c
u
G
Z
<
w
°c
a
—
'a
_
a
w Z y
E
a0e
E
.Wi
U.
Z
O
sv
U
U� F
ce
ce
Superstructure
Substructure
7996700
15E
Hunts
634509
Hunt Rd
0 15
27
Reinforced Cone
Cone Abutment w/
1971
NO
NO
NO
NO
197
STD
4/15/15
8892
Slab
C l P cont piles
IND
1(118
42 TON)
(70 I)ON)
8165100
16E
Little
931507
Center Rd
146
64
Reinforced Cone
Cone Pile cap,
1955
NO
NO
NO
0 63
1 05
STD
4/15/15
59 75 FO
Quilcene
Slab, Cone Girder
Prestress Cone
INO
INO
(22 TON)
(37 TON)
River
piles
8464900
17E
Yarr
931507
Center Rd
3 44
25
Cone Multiple Web
Cone Abutment w/
1955
NO
NO
0 66
STD
4/22/15
64 61
12 MONTH INSPECTION
Girder
Prestress Cone
IND
INO
INO
1039
(14 TON)
(23 TON)
FREQUFNCY
Iles
8320300
23E
Linger
301309
Linger
042
81
Prestress Cone
Cone Abutment w/
1969
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
011
1 49
STD
4/15/15
7003
Longer
Longer Rd
Bulb -T Girder
Cone column over
(32 TON)
(53 1 ON)
C 1 P cone piles
8381400
24E
Rocky
250008
Dosewallips
301
47
Prestress Cone
Cone Abutment w/
1964
NO
NO
NO
NO
072
120
S rD
4/15/15
7699
Brook
Rd
Bulb -T Girder
Cone Spread
INO
(25 rON)
(43 TON)
fooling
8229900
25E
Meyers
503409
Belfrage
012
30
Timber
Timber abutment,
1977
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
21 TON
31 ION
6/27/13
6111
Rd
timber piles
111713
8488200
26E
West Uncas
500209
West Uncas
1 89
61
Rcmf Cone Slab
Cone Abutment,
1964
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
066
1 10STD
4/15/15
82 17
Rd
Cone column over
(23 TON)
(39 TON)
C 1 P cont ile
8136900
28E
Leland
344009
Rice Lake
033
32
Prestress Cone
Cone Abutment,
1987
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
1 59
266
STD
4/I1/15
1111
I
Creek
Rd
Slab
Cone spread
(57 TON)
(95 TON)
FO
footing
8660000
29E
Contractors
501409
Old
3 56
294
Timber Deck,
Cone Pile cap, steel
2000
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
078
1 31
UBI r
7/24/14
8641
UBI r FVERY 4 YEARS —
Creek
Gardiner
Timber Girders
piles
(28 TON)
(47 TON)
LAST UBI F 7/12/2012
Rd
Page 1 of 2
Jefferson County Public Works
Master Bridge List
East Jefferson Countv
a
o �
w-
,�
O
O
0.
F-
a
BRIDGE TYPE
v
W
W
m
z
z
z
a
Ft?C
a
w
<
a
m
ams21;
a
<
y
z
Z
O
S
<
U
a
i
F
.n
�t O F
a
a
Z
W
C
d
F
F
U
a
a
z
W
<
d
Z
V F U
O
<
O
O
?
W
PC
4
OU
O
Z
<
O
Z
W
a
d
(n
<
aCUZ7C
p z F
C9
a
a
_jo
w
a
Superstructure
Substructure
8754000
31 E
Shine Creek
447608
South Point
025
70
Prestress Cone
Cone Abutment w/
2005
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
145
176
STD
4/22/15
97 58
Rd
Slab
Conc Pile
(64 TON)
(108 TON)
8753900
32E
Donovan
327508
E Quilcene
077
70
Prestress Cone
Cone Abutment w/
2006
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
125
1 62
STD
4/15/15
8928
Creek
Rd
Slab
Cone Pile
(60 TON)
(101 TON)
8753800
33E
Old Tarboo
357509
Old Tarboo
088
42
Prestress Cone
Cone Abutment w/
2005
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
l 84
307
STD
4/22/15
8998
Rd
Slab
steel piles
(66 TON)
(1 11 TON)
8753800
38E
Andrews
352909
Snow Creek
378
24
Cone 3 -sided Box
Cone Spread
2014
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
1 23
160 (57
STD
4/15/15
91 14
Creek
Rd
Culvert
Footing
1(44 TON)
TON)
Page 2 of 2
Jefferson County Public Works
Master Bridge List
West Jefferson County
Last Undated 5/i/211119
a
m
�o
Z
p
Z F
D
w w
�
�
U
G'
Z
Z
w
Z
o
a
r
BRIDGE TYPE
F
ewe
O
a
<
i
=
F
U
a
h G p
<y
J
2V<
r
<
s
Y
F
Z
L
<
Z
O
=
>
CC
>
.�
U
;
O
O
Z
F
w
a
Z Z
w U p
Y
a
62O
i
<
6
Z
U U F
cc
w
sz
O
<
z
O
a
O
w
i<„
�
w
a
O
U
o
z
<
o
Z
°'
U
G
H
<
ae z
i- '+
srgo
V
m
Superstructure
Substructure
8451600
O1 W
Fletcher
911607
Quinault S
3 19
78
Prestress Cone
Cone Abutment w/
1974
NO
NO
NO
098
164
STD
5/12114
99 50
Creek
Shore Rd
Bulb -T Girder
C I P cone pile
ING,
INO
(35 TON)
(58 TON)
8258500
02W
Barlow
134309
Oil City Rd
975
64
Prestress Cone Slab
Cone Abutment w/
2005
NO
NO
NO
1 53
199
STD
5/12/14
83 53
C 1 P Cone Pile
INO
INO
(69 TON)
(115 TON)
8145800
03W
Anderson
134309
Oil City Rd
4 44
87
Prestress Cone
Cone Abutment w/
1974
NO
NO
NO
091
152
STD
5/12/14
90 43
Creek
Bulb -T Girder
C 1 P cone pile
INO
�NO
(32 TON)
(54 TON)
8280100
04W
Hell Roaring
914207
Upper Hoh
0 16
120
Prestress Cone
Cone Abutment w/
1982
NO
NO
NO
NO
131
2 19
STD
5/13/14
91 88
Creek
Rd
Girder
steel H pile
INO
(47 TON)
(78 TON)
8298800
05W
Alder Creek
914207
Upper Hoh
2 07
67
Prestress Cone
Cone Abutment w/
1972
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
1 11
1 85
STD
5/13/14
9959
I
Rd
Bulb -T Girder
CIP cone pill e
I
(40 TON)
(66 TON)
8383600
06W
Rock Creek
914207
Upper Hoh
649
83
Prestress Cone
Cone Abutment w/
1973
NO
NO
NO
113
189
STD
5/13114
92 80
I
Rd
Bulb -T Girder
C l P cone pile
INO
INO
(40 TON)
(67 TON)
8384000
07W
Tower Creek
914207
Upper Hoh
75
71
Prestress Cone
Cone Abutment w/
1973
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
1 10
1 84
STD
5/13114
9280
I
Rd
Bulb -T Girder
C I P cont pile
(39 TON)
(66 rON)
8391000
08W
Queets River
107509
Clearwater
0 6
844
Steel Plate Girder,
Cone Piers, Cone
1988
NO
NO
NO
NO
107
1 79
UBIT
5/12/14
9871
UBIT EVERY 4 YEARS
Rd,
C IP cone deck
Abutment w/ steel H
INO
(38 TON)
(64 TON)
tAST UBIT 7/102012
pile
8047800
09W
Hemphill
146809
Dowans
2 3
31
Timber Deck,
Timber abutment,
1977
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
21 TON
31 TON
STD
5/13/14
6039
Creek
Creek Rd
Timber Girders
timber piles
7966600
IOW
Dowans
146809
Dowans
0121
81
Prestress Cone
Conc Abutment w/
1974
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
1 10
184
STD
5/13114
9379
Creek
Creek Rd
Bulb -T Girder
C I P cone pile
(39 ION) 1(66
TON)
Page 1 of 2
Jefferson County Public Works
Master Bridge List
West Jefferson County
1 .clllodated 5/5!2014
Page 2 of 2
m
y
m
Z
F
r
U
Y
�
BRIDLE TYPE
U
F
.�',�
�
e
v
z
z
a
Z
<
a
a�
F n p
F
m
.a
fwd
F
U
<
i
F
F
F
>•
V
F
U
U <
m
O
z
Z
<
a
L
Z
+i F O
Ucc
Y
p
w
a
o
f
<
<
o
<
o
s
—
Z
w
<
m
>
<
m
a
C
v
A
z
—
<
o
j
cc
W
U
Z
W< z
f
s
Superstructure
Substructure
8475700
I l W
Owl Creek
135109
Maple
129
69
Prestress Cone Slab
Cone Abutment w/
1989
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
136
227
STD
5/12/14
8345
Creek Rd
steel H piles
(49 TON)
(81 TON)
FO
8253600
13W
Hurst Creek
107509
Clearwater
266
67
Prestress Cone
Cone Abutment,
1969
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
1 03
172
STD
5/12/14
9886
Rd
Bulb -T Girder
Cone column, Cone
(37 TON)
(61 TON)
footing
8339400
27W
Willoughby
914207
Upper Hoh
352
60
Prestress Cone
Cone Pile cap w/
1962
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
082
137
STD
5/13/14
5903
Creek
Rd
Bulb -T Girder
Prestress Conc piles
(29 TON)
(49 rON)
8659900
30W
Cassel Creek
134309
Oil City Rd
359
154
Steel Girder
Cone Pile cap, steel
2000
YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
119
200
UBIT
7/10/12
7252
Fracture Cnucal Special inspection
piles
(43 TON)
(72 TON)
FO
WSDOT performs inspection with
OBIT bi annually
8829800
34W
Pole Creek
914207
Upper Hoh
8 3
37
Cone 3 -sided Box
Cone Spread
2010
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
I It
144
STD
5/13/14
9280
Rd
Culvert
Footing
(50 TON)
(65 TON)
8845600
35W
Dismal Creek
914207
Upper Hoh
919
22
Cone 3 -sided Box
Cone Spread
2011
NO
NO
1
1 3
STD
5/13/14
9100
Rd
Culvert
Footing
INO
INO
INO
(36 TON)
(46 rON)
8853500
36W
Spruce Creek
914207
Upper Hoh
97
22
Cone 3 -bided Box
Cone Spread
2012
NO
NO
NO
NO
1 176
1 465
SID
5/13/14
92 80
Rd
Culvert
Footing
INO
(42 FON)
(52 FON)
8863300
37W
Alder -Creek
914207
Upper Hoh
215
25
Cont, 3 -sided Box
Cone Spread
2013
NO
NO
NO
NO
100
129
SID
5/13/14
91 11
I nbutary
Rd
Culvert
Footing
INO
(36 TON)
(46 TON)
Page 2 of 2
IN
APPENDIX B
WSDOT - Bridges and Structurrs - Ratings , � Page 1 of 2
atolL
•Twaalrtngton ilitwo
i oopartnwnt of TM.,.pwtaU=
Bridge Ratings
The safety of bridge structures in Washington State is ensured
through a meticulous inspection system All public bridge
owners, such as WSDOT, Counties and Cities, follow the same
bridge inspection procedures The condition rating of all bridge
decks, superstructures and substructures and other elements
based on these inspections
USDOT's Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requires all
public bridge owners (state, city, and county ) to inspect and
their bridges and report information including bridge condition
ratings as part of their requirements in the National Bridge
Inventory Standards (NBIS)
Important aspects of the NBIS were
I All states
must
perform
periodic
Inspections
of bridges
greater than
20 feet in
span on at
least a
biennial
basis.
SR6 Wlllapa River bridge
SR20 Deception Pass Bridge
2 Data collection was standardized and must be reported to FHWA.
3 Qualifications for inspection personnel were defined.
4 Training programs were developed and implemented
5 The Bridge Replacement Program (BRP) was established to provide funding for
bridge replacement on the system
Structurally Deficient
Structurally deficient means that a bridge requires repair or replacement of a certain component This may
include cracked or spalled concrete, the bridge deck, the support structure, or the entire bridge itself If
the condition is such that it no longer is able to carry its intended traffic loads it may be weight restricted
Being structurally deficient does not imply that the bridge is in danger of collapse or unsafe to the traveling
public If a bridge is open then it is considered safe.
A bridge Is classified as "Structurally Deficient" when bridge Inspectors give
either the superstructure, deck, and/or substructure a rating of four or less on
a scale of zero to nine WSDOT's poor condition category uses the same data,
criteria, and rating scale
http //www wsdot wa govBrndge/Report>ng/BndgeRatings htm 8/14/2015
WSDOT - Bridges and Structures - Ratings
WSDOT has 137 state owned bridges that are classified as structurally deficient
as of ]an 2015 A list of these bridges is available in pdf and web page and
map format
Functionally Obsolete
Functional obsolescence is assessed by comparing the existing
design of each bridge to current standards
A bridge can be categorized functionally obsolete a number of ways including
substandard bridge widths, low vertical clearance that can lead to repeated
damage from over height trucks, load -carrying capacity, or flood potential
There are 866 WSDOT bridges that are rated "Functionally Obsolete"
Good, Fair, Poor Condition Rating
Page 2 of
Interstate 82 Columbia River bridge near Umatilla
Good: A range from no problems to some minor detenoration of structural elements
Fair: All primary structural elements are sound but may have deficiencies such as minor section loss,
deterioration, cracking, spalling, or scour
Poor: Advanced deficiencies such as section loss, deterioration, cracking, spalling, scour, or seriously
affected primary structural components Bridges rated in poor condition may be posted with truck weight
restrictions
A summary of the WSDOT bndge network conditions is available in the 2014 Bridge Annual Report in the
Gray notebook
Copyright WSDOT Q 2015
http //www wsdot wa govBndge/ReportmgBndgeRatings him 8/14/2015
Bridge inspection
Definitions
What are "general condition ratings?" According to the National Bridge Inspection Standards
(NBIS), condition ratings are used to describe an existing bridge or culvert compared with its
condition if it were new The ratings are based on the materials, physical condition of the deck
(riding surface), the superstructure (supports immediately beneath the driving surface) and the
substructures (foundation and supporting posts and piers) General condition ratings range from 0
(failed condition) to 9 (excellent) For detailed definitions, click here
Which bridges are included in the NBI system? NBI structures are bridges or culverts that carry
vehicular traffic and have an opening longer than 20 feet measured along the center of the
roadway
What bridges are not considered part of the NBI system? Non-NBI structures include bridges or
culverts that carry vehicular traffic and are eyual to or less than 20 feet measured along the center
of the roadway
VDOT exceeds the NBI standards by inspecting and documenting in our inventory all bridges
regardless of their length and all culverts having an opening greater than 36 square feet
What is a "structurally deficient" bridge? Bridges are considered structurally deficient if they
have been restricted to light vehicles, closed to traffic or require rehabilitation Structurally deficient
means there are elements of the bridge that need to be monitored and/or repaired The fact that a
bridge is "structurally deficient" does not imply that it is likely to collapse or that it is unsafe It means
the bridge must be monitored, inspected and maintained
How is "structural deficiency" determined? The condition of different parts of a bridge is rated
on a scale of 0 to 9 (with 9 being "excellent' and zero being "failed") A structurally deficient bridge is
one for which the deck (riding surface), the superstructure (supports immediately beneath the
driving surface) or the substructure (foundation and supporting posts and piers) are rated in
condition 4 or less
What makes a bridge structurally deficient, and are structural deficient bridges unsafe? The
fact that a bridge is "structurally deficient" does not imply that it is likely to collapse or that it is
unsafe A "deficient„ bridge is one with some maintenance concerns that do not pose a safety risk
A "deficient" bridge typically requires maintenance and repair and eventual rehabilitation or
replacement to address deficiencies To remain open to traffic, structurally deficient bridges are
often posted with reduced weight limits that restrict the gross weight of vehicles using the bridges If
unsafe conditions are identified during a physical inspection, the structure must be closed
What is a "functionally obsolete" bridge? A functionally obsolete bridge is one that was built to
standards that are not used today These bridges are not automatically rated as structurally
deficient, nor are they inherently unsafe Functionally obsolete bridges are those that do not have
adequate lane widths, shoulder widths, or vertical clearances to serve current traffic demand, or
those that may be occasionally flooded
A functionally obsolete bridge is similar to an older house A house built in 1950 might be perfectly
acceptable to live in, but it does not meet all of today's building codes Yet, when it comes time to
consider upgrading that house or making improvements, the owner must look at ways to bring the
structure up to current standards
What is a "fracture -critical" bridge? A fracture -critical bridge is one that does not contain
redundant supporting elements This means that if those key supports fail, the bridge would be in
danger of collapse This does not mean the bridge is inherently unsafe, only that there is a lack of
redundancy in its design
What is a bridge's "sufficiency rating?" Sufficiency ratings were developed by the Federal
Highway Administration to serve as a pnontization tool to allocate funds The rating varies from 0
percent (poor) to 100 percent (very good) The formula considers structural adequacy, whether the
bridge is functionally obsolete and level of service provided to the public
History of Federal Bridge Inspection Program The federal bridge inspection program regulations
were developed as a result of the Federal -Aid Highway Act of 1968 following the collapse of the
Silver Bridge in Point Pleasant, West Virginia The United States Secretary of Transportation
established the National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS) to locate and evaluate existing bridge
deficiencies to ensure the safety of the traveling public
The 1968 Federal -Aid Highway Act directed the states to maintain an inventory of federal -aid
highway system bridges This was amended over time to establish criteria for NBIS bridges
including
• Defining the NBIS to bridges to those on the federal -aid highway system
• Requiring inspections of bridges longer than 20 feet on all public roads
• Expanding bridge inspection programs to include special inspection procedures for fracture -
critical members and underwater inspection
.Bridge Condition
e key
Code Description
N NOT APPLICABLE
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION No problems noted
7 GOOD CONDITION Some minor problems
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION Structural elements show some minor deterioration
5 FAIR CONDITION All primary structural elements are sound but may have some
minor section loss (due to corrosion), cracking, spalling (deterioration of concrete
surface) or scour (erosion of soil)
4 POOR CONDITION Advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour
3 SERIOUS CONDITION Loss of section, deterioration, spalling or scour have
seriously affected primary structural components Local failures are possible
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present
2 CRITICAL CONDITION Advanced deterioration of primary structural elements
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may
have removed substructure support Unless closely monitored it may be necessary
to close the bridge until corrective action is taken
"IMMINENT" FAILURE CONDITION Mayor deterioration or section loss present in
critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting
structure stability Bridge is closed to traffic but corrective action may put back in
light service
0 FAILED CONDITION Out of service - beyond corrective action