Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
091216_ra01
Department of Public Works O Regular Agenda: 10:00 AM Page 1 of 1 Jefferson County Board of Commissioners Agenda Request To: Board of Commissioners Philip Morley, County Administrator From: Monte Reinders, Public Works Director/County Engineer __ Agenda Date: September 12, 2016 Subject: Adopt the 2017-2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Statement of Issue: Conduct a public hearing for the purpose of receiving public testimony concerning adoption of the 2017-2022 Jefferson County Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Analysis / Strategic Goals / Pros t* Cons: RCW 36.81.121 requires the annual adoption of a six-year transportation improvement program after holding a public hearing. The purpose of the law is to "assure that each county shall perpetually have available advanced plans looking to the future for not Less than six years as a guide in carrying out a coordinated transportation program" (RCW 36.81.121(1)). Fiscal Impact / Cost -Benefit Analysis: The TIP relies heavily on the availability of outside grant and program funding from the State and Federal government. Fiscal impact is evaluated through the annual budgeting process including adoption of an Annual Road Construction Program. Recommendation: After considering public testimony, approve by Resolution the proposed Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program. Return a signed copy of the Resolution to Public Works for further processing. Department Contact: Zoe Ann Lamp, AICP, Transportation Planner 385-9162 Date In the Matter of Adoption of the 2017-2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program COUNTY OF JEFFERSON STATE OF WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO WHEREAS, State law obligates the legislative authority of each county to adopt on an annual basis a six-year transportation improvement program, holding a public hearing prior to adoption, the purpose of which is to "assure that each county shall perpetually have available advanced plans looking to the future for not less than six years as a guide in carrying out a coordinated transportation program" (RCW 36 81 121(1)), and, WHEREAS, an analysis of the Road Fund was prepared covering the six-year program period using the County's best estimate of future revenues and expenditures in accordance with WAC 136-15-130 and, WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, Jefferson County, State of Washington, has reviewed the transportation priority array and bridge condition report as prepared by the Department of Public Works, and has conducted a public hearing on the corresponding proposed six-year transportation improvement program, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners does approve and adopt the Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program for the years 2017 through 2022, inclusive IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that, with respect to the items listed in the Program, the County Engineer is authorized to make revision to individual project scope, length and teriiuni, timing, and funding sources, as may be required from time to time due to additional resources becoming available or unavailable and in accordance with RCW 36 81 130 and WAC 136-16, without the Board of County Commissioners having to conduct a public hearing or adopt a resolution to amend the Program ADOPTED and signed flus day of 2016 ATTEST Erin Lundgren Clerk of the Board JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Kathleen Kler, Chair Phil Johnson, Member David Sullivan, Member Jefferson County Public Works DRAFT 2017-2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program ,�_ .rte rte' 'DWI r Jefferson County Public Works 623 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone: 360-385-9160 www.co.jefferson.wa.us/publicworks E 141 V•�A � 1I` e _ ! I � SYS �� it { E 141 V•�A � 1I` e _ ! I � SYS �� it DRAFT 2017-2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Table of Contents Letter of Introduction from the Public Works Director...............................................................1 Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners Noticeof Public Hearing......................................................................................................3 2017-2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement (TIP) Program ProjectLocation Map..........................................................................................................5 ProjectList............................................................................................................................7 Acronyms Used In the Project List..................................................................................10 Budget and Funding Information 2017 — 2022 Six Year TIP by Project Category...............................................................13 Graphs.................................................................................................................................14 Six -Year County Road Fund Projections.........................................................................16 BridgeCondition Report................................................................................................................18 Jefferson County Department of Public Works 623 Sheridan St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 385-9160 Monte Reinders, P.E. Public Works Director/County Engineer Welcome to the 2017-2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program (T.I.P.). Since the 2016- 2021 T.I.P. adoption in November 2015, multiple emergency projects have dominated the department's time and resources. This resulted in pushing several projects scheduled for construction in 2016 to future years. Between November 2015 -May 2016, the department spent approximately $795,000. on three emergency sites. Additionally, the department made a focused effort to develop a new road alignment to provide secure access for the residents on Undie Road past milepost 0.90, where slope instability threatened to cut off access to their homes. Construction on the new alignment began on August Ist with anticipated completion mid-November. As part of the 2016 construction program, the department replaced a failing substandard culvert with a short span bridge on Upper Hoh Road at milepost 6.95. The Six -Year T.I.P. is a "rolling" plan that is updated each year to provide direction to transportation improvements on Jefferson County's 400 -mile public road system. Development of the T.I.P. is a process that identifies and prioritizes needs, develops projects to meet the needs, and incorporates some of those projects into a six-year plan. A variety of project types is included in the T.I.P. The T.I.P. is strongly influenced by the availability of funding and many of the projects listed do not, as yet, have secured funding. Historically, projects on Jefferson County's T.I.P. have averaged about 70% funding from State and Federal sources. Many non -local transportation revenue sources, however, only fund certain types of improvements on certain types of roads, and the result is that Federal and State priorities strongly influence what actually gets accomplished. Lack of available local match limits the number and size of grants that can be utilized. Local funds available for this proposed 6 -year capital improvement program average only $266,000. per year. Jefferson County has a limited tax base with transportation revenues among the lowest in western Washington when measured in terms of dollars available per road mile. The county road fund has seen a 25% overall reduction in annual operating revenue due to loss of federal land timber revenue in recent years, and as a result, road fund reserves are drawn down more and more each year. The Six -Year T.I.P., like any other capital improvement plan, is only a plan for what should be done provided adequate funding is available. It shows what funding must be sought and/or what revenue sources must be developed. Decisions about which projects actually get advanced are made through the annual County budgeting process. Since the Six -Year T.I.P. is updated annually, it can be changed to reflect new needs, priorities, and changed budgetary conditions. I hope you find this document useful in understanding Jefferson County's Transportation Improvement Program. If you would like more information, feel free to contact the Jefferson County Public Works office, located at 623 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend at (360)385-9160. Monte Reinders, P.E. Director/County Engineer NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: PROPOSED SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners on Monday, September 12, 2016, at 10:00 AM in the Commissioners' Chambers at the County Courthouse, 1820 Jefferson Street, Port Townsend, Washington, for the purpose of taking testimony concerning the adoption of the Jefferson County 2017-2022 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program. "Each county shall perpetually have available advanced plans looking to the future for not less than six years as a guide in carrying out a coordinated transportation program" (RCW 36.81.121(1)). Written public comments on the proposed Program will also be accepted any time up through the close of the public hearing, addressed to the BoCC at P. O. Box 1220, Port Townsend, WA 98368 or by email at jeflboccco.jefferson.wa.us. The proposed 2017-2022 Program is available at the Commissioners' office at the County Courthouse, (360) 385-9100, and on the County website: www.co.jefferson.wa.us. Jefferson County ensures full compliance with Title VI of the Civil rights Act of 1964 by prohibiting discrimination against any person on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the provision of benefits & services resulting from its federally assisted programs & activities. The meeting site is accessible to persons with disabilities and accommodations for people with disabilities can be arranged with advance notice by calling (360) 385-9100. Kathleen Kler, Chair f T Board of Jefferson County Commissioners 3 1QN� Jefferson County Discovery Bal, 1e woodla o 7C 20spect Av Transportation old Gar s et° - Admiralty Improvement Program or 13 21 frond 13 Q 'x q Inlet 2017-2022 as 19 Rd�� ti 11 SR s tiCt'CC C �� 116 C1` j to 1 U _Ande_rsop_ abs 4. I l LJ v H 20 w ai Rd o Oak Bay n. "On f 0 1 - � o y9 Puget Sound L_— 3I v i nto,t eEk 15 I � _ V d om - 16 i Pe 4 _ i t 30 t Rd E99 & I Rd srz i None,, 1briRCZ'yh N Yee C RV ` c % arson Lake dig aw i 10 Rd gaY Rd b�wrow Col 1 ` ° o E ee Para l o . y � m o d N 10 ^ -0 111 ; Y r z qo �I = .0 m m � A 11 -------------- -- ----------,- ~ o R I a 3 Squamish j Cl d o. , CANADA,,- Ilsland (` ° CV P �, Harbor Clallam ---- °d Rd- a � zz o 1ef rson 6 ---�Zm �,a Box numbegrscorrespond -- ! \ ra S aY Or Mason 1 C� 1 a �h0 to projegt numbers in Y I- eP� narrghve summary. m 0 Funding Secured m` G obi �z v_ Planned (unfunded) u, Cr 1kJ``ec f ----_ Clallam / -- ------ o --- ei9 11"g,f Jefferson I4 �3 Dabo z5 upper Hoh Q • 4Bo�a0 Popo�� ale -P� � Js ,o � °o©Q� r� gee I77 son G , v- s. t L-—"�3osewaallips a- l �� � 101 � CbmcaaD Gt700©0" ewa Ips fiver o I 3 I--- � j Z —, - ----- Scale in Miles rdy5 Or ,---------26 1 2 J —.JI -11� i -azel Point R Y Htl3AlH1NOW Y Z 0 3131MOO 31VO } Y } m z w NIA 403H MM ❑m w w 3dAl LL 0 ntl1N3W o 0 0 0 w -NOHIAN3 ��v 0 0 moo 0 0 0 N 0 o mvv�c «ei oeoA r ve ov 2_ o .6 O 6ei'ro o 0 _ _ p N N } W � N J } W 2 U 01 W � N K F } ❑ Z W ao x gN w uu�i } eo ao .� a a ' NM< } Oo M C ct N R R ct R r o b M N h OA 1 r V r V O O' N } IR O N Obi A V V P N r N R IR N. _ IR O O b O M V IR e O O R q o 0 q qN OObi im v mm r rom O O A M O 1` - �� aovv ee 'a O mr= av va NN bo m r u4 o a n o n o ea r oe � m o M b U Z O J O b V V O V V _ d z w O W J Z vb H K O W O � W Y W m m N b N' N M vOi_ n N m N .�- M o J m F O, y A N N a N A A N y O V V T O M �O Z O= ❑ J U o Z LL °'O� wy a a O LL m OO Q 0 r LLr W b LL yQa u yQa N N US g a m C C C K 6 ccJW U V 66 U U U 4' W N N O b 3SVHd ASn a ❑ 0 0 n n A r O - z 1sOO 1"303d LL O: 0 3000 y a a LL oNnd ltlil3o3d W W W y z = SINVIS 3SVHd MV3A I H1NOW 39tlHd1O3foad ui ' ui q ui 3 q w 3 m w c A ui3- arc V H wrc VH w OF w OF w Vr w Vr w Vr w Vr w¢�r wrG�� smoo Allnlln a d d a 3 d a o H10N31ntllol o •- z m Snivis"uNnd N N W W N N b N b b (S)3dAl e 1N3W3AONdW1 m « "° a S m m m e be 3 o o. r - o U U y m v c E m ai t y o a ,- a u c ii > E .. m > c o E E o_ 6 10 p m o 0 E c= iro~ mN o -m °- ^' E n m ,• - m ec a �g n3 v� E "M U a o o NI m- r- Q Y LL. LL m m o m E o. -m a c n; ° m 3 i, c 4 m 125.6 � m y� a o s� 1@~9y❑v c m 0 a u as N z �''"s m° -J d z o Uo Z'm z ad o f- i - c ryrca d� m E.° •CU d f =0m va a o 2 U Z. « u m w m o N_' - `rn o a a E@ E a `�° E 2 V .12 °u n 2' c o rn a �.• a z 3 Z Z E v o 0 w'_« o m a o- o _ « 0 E° E- ro m > o« s Z p Z rn C a f K ° o S o N m y o a .- ° o m �+w o a'� dig a m �_' LL E E mb u°Di U E c m EOy °_ vin L o a y o y m m m'o o m o �o U E a u w@ E, 2— 2E 2k 3 o 3 "' x m o y r o o m .- _i o oe d c o li o E o Ti 'o .- 'o b y _@ ❑ o v o r y n c m m o❑ .. K ° t o o v o a na Y u o o K- ° m o o G m❑ o 0 o w' o e E 6dmU0 W NUN U dm0N E oNm W =° F-mJN�m m C� °FHOU� °mOU Of bmN 61-NfP, _ lrLL FmOU 6! - 'ON 1O3r011d dLL sstli3-3Nnd 6 z 6 z a z w c 0 O U c 0 m Z v T O o Q Y Htl3AlH1NOW Y Z 0 3131MOO 31VO Y z w NIA 403H MM w w 3dAl LL 0 1tl1N3W w o w 0 a -NOHIAN3 N R R R 0 R 0 o IR R cz Rl R R R Rl -� Q R O o' N _c:i o O 'o e a v v O a o A W c O ^ O vOi IN. N OO� tp r No.o } o o.N N W N j m } W O i0 O d O - O ow 2 U y w N � J } F D N N v�io a n Iq R R Ra a Iq a as a Z W am X N W } R R 'O N o ct ct ct ct v'iu V N 'o 'o A A 'o w N } N } IR voio e 1. 0o O�oro 'o a- o oaa as o �r"r F F N N M h n0b V i J ON U Z O J Oo N YI o A O N n e N n - o vOi vOf O N O of O N O T I. IN z w O W J 0 > � 0w � O z Y w m w oo o u� a a s s J N F N N O M O O d O O j= y O= 0a O MONI r M V N tq0 Z 0 J O LL yy 2 F Q Q r LL K m , r a rc dg s K z C K 0:N y a a a c0i yQ g o U C F a w a U a' U a 0:�a: N y a 0 3SVHd A9 a o n a g c N o z 1SOO 11M3o3d LL c' r m K 0 3000 150! m CL LL oNlld lvw3O3d N y N SINVIS 3SVHd MV3A l H1NOW 39VHd1O3foild waa Z 33 1; li 3333 3?� 33 V H .2 ate¢ V F aha OF ate¢ V F ata V Z ata fjF a V F a¢�r arGu� S3o0O Allllln ~ ~ ~ ~ H1oN3l ltl101 o O o z z o SN1tl1S'oNn:i N a a a a a a a a a (S)3dAl e 1N3W3AOIIdWl d c o � ii v '• o y c t _ d o x _ 3 V 'a i3 G a 3 E N _ m d d o a.0 aUrn :-. O m 5« ?H ?• Z 6 'C d ^ n N o o N E .4. u ,_ c m 3 -J' m o c o N E m E 5 K a E y o m m 3 V? @ m•• c o 3 m E a v Err W Z= r u E > Sa >`Ern� m0= E z a d ~ na r o Y 'o oe •® o° c U xt E m E o: m ooc d m E 3 c `v i �ooUm t 9 c p d U S ~ C `o N o E rG° E y d For ? z W a z F p p a C o o W p O C a y m E o o m O E a o o m M C ry Uf9 o II N Q O y O c .n Cl K Y O a > o C K G C o a d- h C 4 u a 3 0 o c c E a s in c g ❑wu, F o c �F� E o Tiro - �n V d _r Q E Y o f •- d w d O dO N C p: m G m m II O a c O r-' H N p L P u p G= upi U N- o o N y L =� o N 11 N- A y d•-� m N _� O- E O tdt N N j 4 r 9 O m H U E O admtioui O.R O �7a` vrmrca�a`.pyrt Y a O O O NO ma`m0- N O p ma`m0Um"r°I°-Mv��at°-mc'!¢" O G O T y ter° �cirm'x E -ON 1O3rOUd dLL r ssvi3,ONOd Q z Q z Q z Q z Y Htl3AlH1NOW Y Z 0 3131MOD 31VO Y 4 z ? z a z w NIA 403H MM o m w LL 3dA1 W a0, 1tl1N3W 0 0 0 0 a -NOHIAN3 N or �o Of N r �n000 M d b 000 0 o r N N O N N N N N N N } O } W in c lztwOV N N N x U n W N z Ili N o N A n o n O O o NoF Z W a X W o0 b om r S v' N aQY W N } N } O Q N M n on aNMu+ a I e F o F r T N O o N N N N N U z O b m w1 V N A r z w O W 0 > � 0w C O W m W -1-Oi o r m F a Nw N, °n `wa Ojz m0x O a 0 v Z LL Z O U 00 U gao w m K C LL' C a m 3StlHd A9 a o 0 - z 1SOO l\M3O3d LL a a K 0 3000 LL ONnd lvw3O3d J N J J S1Mtl1S3SVHd MV3A l H1NOW 39tlHd 103fOild a3 V .2 23 V a it asVZ a cir a coil S3000 Allllln ~ ~ ~ 1'!wl a v a a H1ON3l ltl1O1 z N z z SN1tl1S'ONn:i a a a a a a a (S)3dAl e o 1N3W3AOIIdWl o N 'S d - E Y c a o oo m - a m n '9 o E E za d ~ d ,y _' x E u m W w m o c o D m ea �'w o� H'c� a cpm �dcaa�E a o o a m o a m d a LL wz3 P E cn 3az o $ 10- m oo z° o W a z @ C O n o d y o Y m o rc p d o o o Z' - = o`o m y ao a 0 O a t 7 v O C a N N- H J m o m �= N "» 3 E E:°- a a x° N m° mmao �'o 0 O` m-_ a0, 6 d m U 0 YI oN o 41 3:,.. F n W W K F- O� 7 U d U W r n=a 0 U u°i I°- W `o r> U> d a 'ON 1O3f021d dll r r r N SStllO'ONOd a Z a Z Guide to Codes and Acronyms The following is a guide to codes and acronyms used in the TIP project spreadsheet for Jefferson County. FUNCTIONAL CLASS 02 Rural Other Principal Arterial 06 Rural Minor Arterial 09 Rural Local Access 07 Rural Major Collector 17 Urban Collector 08 Rural Minor Collector 19 Urban Local Access IMPROVEMENT TYPES 01 New construction roadway 15 Preliminary Engineering 03 Reconstruction - added capacity 16 Right -of -Way 04 Reconstruction - no added capacity 17 Construction Engineering 05 4R Maintenance - resurfacing 18 Planning 06 4R Maintenance - restoration & rehabilitation 19 Research 07 4R Maintenance - relocation 20 Environmental only 08 Bridge - new construction 21 Safety 10 Bridge replacement - added capacity 22 Rail/highway crossing 11 Bridge replacement - no added capacity 23 ITransit 13 Bridge rehabilitation - added capactiy 24 ITraffic Management/Engineering - HOV 14 Bridge rehabilitation - no added capacity FEDERAL FUNDING STATUS S=Secured (funded); P=Planned (unfunded) UTILITY CODES C= Cable TV; G=Gas; O=Other; P=Power; S=Sewer; T=Telephone; W=Water PROJECT PHASE P.E.=Preliminary Engineering; R/W=Right-of-Way; Const.=Construction 10 Guide to Codes and Acronyms The following is a guide to codes and acronyms used in the TIP project spreadsheet for Jefferson County. FEDERAL FUND CODES (applicable to Jefferson County) ER Emergency Relief FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FLAP Federal Lands Access Program HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program NFPP National Fish Passage Program PILT Payment in Lieu of Taxes PLHD Public Lands Highways Discretionary Program SRS Secure Rural School STP -R Surface Transportation Program -Regional STP -S Surface Transportation Program -Safety STP -SA Surface Transportation Program -Set Aside WAFH Washington Forest Highways Program STATE FUND CODES (applicable to Jefferson County) ALEA Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account EMD Emergency Management Department NOVA Non -Highway and Off -Road Vehicle Activities Program PBP Pedestrian and Bicycle Program PSAR Puget Sound Acquisition and Restoration Fund RAP Rural Arterial Program RCO Recreation & Conservation Office RRG Recreation Resource Grant SRFB Salmon Recovery Funding Board SRTS Safe Routes to School Program WWRP Washington Wildlife Recreation Program OTHER FUND CODES (applicable to Jefferson County) PIF Public Infrastructure Fund ENVIRONMENTAL TYPE CE Categorically Exempt DCE Documented Categorically Exempt EA Environmental Assessment EIS Environmental Impact Statement 11 2017-2022 SIX-YEAR TIP BY PROJECT CATEGORY Prior. # Project Description Permanent Repairs and Mitigation for Emergency Projects Local Other State Federal Total 2 IQUINAULT SOUTH SHORE ROAD REPAIR $ 127,764 $ - $ 818,637 1 $946,401 3 DOSEWALLIPS ROAD PERMANENT SLIDE REPAIR $ 16,400 $ 147,600 $ - $164,000 11 UNDIE ROAD EMERGENCY ROAD RELOCATION $ 10,000 $ - $ - $10,000 Category Subtotal $1,953,000 $154,164 $2,170,000 $147,600 $818,637 $1,120,401 Rnad A InterSertinn Imnrnvements Lnral Other State Federal Tntal 1 CENTER RD OVERLAY - PHASE 5 $0 $91,362 $822,258 $ $913,620 4 UPPER HOH ROAD/OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK FLAP PROJECT $30,000 $ - $ $30,000 8 SOUTH DISCOVERY ROAD PAVEMENT PRESERVATION $49,997 Category Subtotal $449,970 $ $499,967 13 SOUTH DISCOVERY ROAD REALIGNMENT $217,000 $950,000 $1,953,000 $ $2,170,000 14 CHIMACUM RD IMPROVEMENT INCL RTMT BALLFIELD CONNECTION $249,750 15 $0 $ 1,600,250 $1,850,000 18 QUILCENE CENTER ROAD REBUILD -2R (RESURFACE & RESTORE) $71,0001 $ 639,000 $ - $710,000 21 IS. DISCOVERY ROAD 3 R PROJECT $ 92,000 $ 828,000 $0 $920,000 22 EAST QUILCENE ROAD FLOOD HAZARD MITIGATION $ 50,652 $ 455,861 $0 $506,513 23 UPPER HOH ROAD/OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK CHIP SEAL $ 67,500 $ - $432,5001 $500,000 Category Subtotal $827,899 $91,362 $5,148,089 $2,032,750 $8,100,100 Culvert & Bridge Replacement/Repair Local Other State Federal Total 9 SALMON CREEK BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION -W. UNCAS RD MP0.804 1 $45,3051 1 $789,395 $ 94,000 $928,700 16 IWEST VALLEY ROAD CULVERT REPLACE MENT-NAYLOR CREEK 1 $ 75,000 1 1 $425,000 $ - $500,000 17 ISNOW CREEK ROAD CULVERT REPLACEMENT - MP 0.84 1 $ $ $1,970,5281 $1,970,528 Category Subtotal $120,305 $1,214,395 $2,064,528 $3,399,228 Nnn-Mntnri7ad Trancnnrtatinn I nral Other State Federal Tntal 5 RICK TOLLEFSON TRAIL- PHASE 1 (CHIMACUM VALLEY) $ 40,065 $311,514 $641,797 $993,376 6 QUILCENE COMPLETE STREETS 26 ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT FOR QUINAULT SOUTH SHORE ROAD $0 $ 798,595 $ - $798,595 7 ODT - OLD GARDINER TO SALMON CREEK (SEG A) $ 189,000 $ 10,000 $1,220,000 $ $1,419,000 10 ODT - DISCOVERY BAY TO LARRY SCOTT TRAIL CONNECTION $0 $950,000 $ $950,000 12 RICK TOLLEFSON TRAIL - PHASE 2 (CONNECTIONS) $25,000 $125,000 $ $150,000 15 SOUTH DISCOVERY BAY - SEGMENT B $ 77,500 $775,000 $ $852,500 19 ICEDARAVENUE & NESS CORNER RD (SR 116) PED -BIKE IMPROVEMENTS 1 $ 10,000 1 $693,4841 $ $703,484 20 IHJ CARROLLTHROUGH CHIMACUM CROSSROADS PED -BIKE IMPROVEMENTS 1 $ 29,000 1 1 $1,081,0501 $ I $1,110,050 Category Subtotal $370,565 $10,000 $5,954,643 $641,797 $6,977,005 Eneineerine Assessments & Countvwide Proerams Local Other State Federal Total 24 COUNTYWIDE BRIDGE LOAD RERATING PER FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS $63,068 $ - $ 86,932 $150,000 25 OIL CITY ROAD ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT $0 $0 $ 250,000 $250,000 26 ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT FOR QUINAULT SOUTH SHORE ROAD $0 $ - $ 250,000 $250,000 27 VARIOUS COUNTYWIDE IMPROVEMENTS $60,000 $ - $ - $60,000 Category Subtotal $123, 068 50 5586,932 5710,000 Updated: August 26, 2016 13 2017-2022 Six -Year TIP By Project Category Road & intersection Im $8,100,100 40% Culvert & Bridge Replacement/ $3,399,228 17% 14 Permanent Repairs and Mitigation for Emergency Projects $1,120,401 6% Engineering Assessments & Countywide Programs $710,000 3% orized Transportation $6,977,005 34% 2017 - 2022 Six year Transportation Program Funding Breakdown Percentages by Revenue Source Stab $12,464 61% r.,1 1 Local $1,596,000 8% other 101,362 19'4 2017 - 2022 Funding: Secured vs. Planned Planned $12,653,075 62% Secured $7,653,659 38% °! Average Annual Road Fund Revenue Used on Capital Projects Road Levy & MVF1 Reaenuefor Operating Costs $5,178,521 95% LJ Road Levy & MVFT for Capital Projects $266,000 5% Average Annual Road Fund Revenue = $5,444,521 15 to wV W .O a C LL O W� U L X_ N N N Q N r N 16 M M O - N O N m O M W O P O O O O O Q m O M M O O O1 m O M IA O Q O O O lry e N N J o m n m M O O N O N. m O "i O m IA IO N m O r n OI m N M b n n Q n ppj O F N N N N In aT O N m N O O N N m V N O M O A W N M m m m th m W IO Ir N w W n M c�j A O aMD OI F lD N Q a0 V M m N m m M IA r to N M A M O O ry" N n N N N In N 0 O O O N m O O O N O O N N W O A m O O M M O O O O N O o N N aD M m m M O O O aD O N O M N a O W M a IO 0 m m Q Q m N Q A N N A n N c0 In O N N n� 7 N N b ap N Q Q O O M N Q c m LLS r n N n O M m M O Ip N m A N K O m Q N OO f M M � r m o m N N <{ n N m Q m Z P M aD IO Q In o m m ap o m o m m IA m n M Q M N n n O m m n n N N fD m r O V a t0 N Oi Q d Il � 1 O t0 m N O CI yj M O N aD I� K O n Q N O M N M m n m N m n M N o O! n OI M W M r M N m N m N Q N N N W Q b N N Oi Q O O O O O O O O M M O O O O O M Q O P P m O m m n O N r 0 OI O O W pl a MQ 7 m N m O M O O M O m O In O M M Q Q O m O m M m M M Q Q M O M In m O N Q m O n m m P M rom IO -c P CO,� i0 � O O� ','O M M f0 In m � N M O Q N r N O M b O A [wj M r m O 1p O O M N M Q N O m Of m n m r W m 0 N m N A N Q N N N V V O Q 17 b Q 'Qi O N r W O O O O O N 10 0 Q O O O O N O O N N OI O N m W O P In 0 0 0 0 N O e N m M M Q 7 n r N O O m 0 In O m O O Q m O n o 0 N A r M N N M m 0 Oi M m O NR O OM O O V aNp_ C m m C wl mN N O c A mM �m H OWi N M OAJ M Q N l T w m Q c0 b N M r Q n m N i0 O N N m n O o 0 o o O In n 0 m O O O O N �O O O O m O c0 m n O O N O O M M e M N N m O o m [h lA 00 0 0 0 o q ao 0 In o o r n M Q Yf n A A M MW M o m m M o m o th m N m M Of m p� IWG N r a � O W m M O � 10 In N r N In N W !p O d N M n � �� N � A m In M M In m In O LQ m ry m N m N In Q 0 O O O O O O O O O O O� OI O m m O O IO m m O P M O n 0 0 0 F W N N m Wo O O O m O In O m In M M O O In m r m M M N N m m IO O IO Q O O m P N O> n m O ppj n V N C7 P M N O O f0 In V m I(J Q Q EO N a m Q M m O I(j Q Ln lD O! m OG Q O O M N M m Q r y m O! m M M N O Q m n N O A Of N W O p OI tt) O W IA O� r r c n a O w M O O O N m M Q m n m O A 0 M T O N N N m Q N N O Q m r m O Q m r ZR M M m o m m M O m O O N M m O> m m �O n M N O M 0 I= N m m M Q N N m r Q f P M m Q N O M m O r m r A N m W m O m O Q N P M pNj IWO p Q r Um w m N N N W M l!) M N' to to O N m O M P r OD M Q N N N W M t0 N l0 m N O M m fD f0 ll7 Q M W tD N O M O Q Q of W �p Q ry b OJ N N <O m m N N Ol M I() Q Q' Q fD M Oi V N (V - M Oi c`M M d a O O O In N Q r N lA n P m O m Q Q O ep Q N In In m m O P N N N m m Q J Q m O O m O m O Q N Q Q m O> m m Q n Q W W m r O m o M m OI m O Q m O M O m O n Q m 0 O O O O m r W Q O r In m v`�i m V INO O 7 m W ON O (O m m W N n A N W to M N N In W r t0 N l0 N O N N W O n M M tp' N N O N m U N N N N M N M N M m Q Q fD N M Oi t+i N M v Oi c`M M J m O m m m m Q Q m M O Q O NO m O� OI m Q f0 N N n Of O n In n O m T M m M m M LO In O O co N D O r N � O N N O m ll7 Q In m. - M A In l0 A M Q Q t0 N V N J Q N W Q 6> m O N Om W M N IA O> Q N In O Q M m M m N Of m N N N OI M Q aD O� M u7 M M N r r M O m i0 Of m O M m o o ui o co .- vi co o lu o vi v W r o Q o r` Q v In ri r` � 7 of � vi Q N (O O O A N m l!) Q m W co Q OI A m r m N W r O `-' O m r tp n 0 O O 0 ll7 n M m t0 a O O I() Q Ip A W N M M M Q W s O M U Q v vi aS ri ai m v � N ni a o v ai m Q LO O Q Q O M m m W m Q M N ul N Q N m m n N M I O m r0 7 oIQ C! W 7 N n m M N M m m rn n Q W IA H W m m Q W V V V N m to M^ O Q M Q m r' Q - M m In Q N m N m T O lt7 N N O. •- A h M m Q M M a N M vi IO t+i r N r v a J Q d (D O O N O O O O (O m Q Q O m O � W N N Ol l[) m m In Q N m Q I: IA O r m. N M P Q W N O O r In Q P M m P Q m m Q m N Q N '- m p� m It7 N m N N m N OI O! m O 7 0 m IO M n w O M N Oi Oi m C vl W N O N N O M N O Itj N (O M tT c+) ry N m O N v cD U N M r N n N N n Q m O N m12 M N O m OI O O m m Q N m n OI O m M M Q m n m N O m N M O� m N W N M Q M f0 t� M J M O� O O I� m O O N m N N n M IO Oi O m Q N O N A n P m m c O N O O O� OI O OI r O W m OI OI m O N O In W In O m m M m O m m e� \ m M M N O �O N A m N m O N ^ m O N Oi M N r A O f: W M N M O In O N M c m m In p O n n N Q W N N 7 F O N tp m M In n N m mN In N M In to m N O N m n N m !T n W r N tb m O Q N M N M N f0 A r M Q m M N m b m r M O !fl m O N O Q In Q M N r M m ' -71 V 1 1 9 N O O� N m m n O n n IO n O O A QQ O N N M In n Iry N O OI n n n O A W (p a\° A m N N Q O O m cp IO . N O m N O_ O� M M W O o M C c0 (p m W V m O^ O O� m N Q OJ 7 O m O N I!) m O M m In m ro t0 m 1p r O O� N A m n V (4 A F On U N (O Ol r N OlOI N r m M N N N m O N r m r In to p M W N A N Q M Y1 ch N N P Q ..i Q Q V 0 0 IA O o 0 to O 0 O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 O 0 O 0 O C 0 0 0 0 (V N N N N O uj W y W « N co W M m N W W V1 co m m w N _ rn z O °� Q Q Lu K o 7 N 7 C .W. O N w N O z ± p, 0= 7 2 F .-. n `� U co Z 0 w m z O O x F �° W z o o y LL, N> m N a0i W W w V7 wxw X .¢ N G w v N o w Z w w U K d K z L)z K> a K o awry7dz X m a g d Z ¢ F W (A w> (� .. d y > p K >w> LL' z u o N z W j O F U Z o 'o Q Co W j O aioi�u v �w >� z d > w d d W F ww Z vl Z� F W LL. Y F- wu� d y w O ¢ w w = u) J lA w w y K H J K p W r z o 7 Z W J a a °� O In Z a� F wI wwu w a W d a d ¢ u F- yr O zwz—gF�a W J Q Q F W O az O g¢ J F > F > LL fD w p > F F } d �( Z O d. LL w fn LL U N J m Z Z' d Q 0 d f!] X N O Q F d Z O U (J Q C� J N Z 7 N d U Q J O H J X z a!J (n d fn C CO d w LL' J O z 0 w �• W Q: d' IQi w a Z Z W LL W d' LL, d, W W Q W fn fn f1 a Q 7 F LL~ 0-' p 7 J a O d U J J a d N J z U g J J U O> J w C W Z z Z U a a Y U R' W W~ J w W m Q O R `m O �0 O `y r J Z m j w Z K H w Z Q rQ- Q X w = w O O Z Q w m o LL' W d d' 2 F : N �1 L : N Ol 9 d t 6 H Q F O Z Q w 0 J Q F C7 d d F m u W c7 > c m W a d' d' a d Q O� m K O F W Z LL U 7 Q LL U W �- d 0 W O d' H % d W LL N N O % W d d K LL m N O m O f.1 F J Q Q w K W W of O x F F Z H ¢ O �" J X w W Of 0 0 U U 0 0 0 F J a J ¢ w m W K Z W Q U O w d0 d v O senuanaa 6u!;eiadp senuanab;aafOad lel!deo saanl!puedx3 yseo N C V .O L a V c LL O C 0 U L Vi N N O N ti r O N 2 H O O O O O r O O O O O O O O O O O O o LO O O O O O O O O O O O O W W (-) Z CO CO Z Z LL LL Z Z O C] C] U) J Q W w W W _ U) O O O O O O <O ff} Ln fft It EA co E9- Z Z ol- W W N Q U T � ■ N N O N T N O N O N O N O T O N _00 O N T O N LO O N C N CM T O N N T O N T T O N O T O N r'21 O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O 6r3 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O <O ff} Ln fft It EA co E9- N V> T 60- T � 17 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners Jefferson County Department of Public Works 623 Sheridan St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 385-9160 Monte Reinders, P.E. Public Works Director/County Engineer FROM: Monte Reinders, P.E., Public Works Director/County Engineer DATE: June 15, 2016 SUBJECT: Bridge Condition Report 2016 INTRODUCTION As required by WAC 136-20-060, each county engineer shall furnish the county legislative authority with a written report of the findings of the bridge inspection effort. This report shall be made available to said authority and shall be consulted during the preparation of the proposed six- year transportation program revision. The report shall include the county engineer's recommendations as to replacement, repair or load restriction for each deficient bridge. The resolution of adoption of the six-year transportation program shall include assurances to the effect that the county engineer's report with respect to deficient bridges was available to said authority during the preparation of the program. BRIDGE INVENTORY Jefferson County Public Works has 31 active bridges — see the attached Master Bridge List (Appendix A) for a listing of the county bridges. Jefferson County also has two permanently closed bridges, which are not listed on the Master Bridge List. BRIDGE INSPECTIONS The National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS) and WAC 136-20-030 mandate that public agencies inspect and report on all bridges at least once every two years (routine inspection). Jefferson County staff performs all routine inspections. Special inspections are required for bridges that cannot be inspected adequately from the ground. For these bridges an Under -Bridge Bridge Condition Report 2016 Page 1 of 4 18 Inspection Truck (UBIT) is required. Steel bridges with fracture critical members may also require special inspections with the UBIT and/or other special equipment. Jefferson County has two bridges which require the UBIT inspection and one bridge which requires both the UBIT and the fracture critical inspection (identified in the attached Master Bridge List). Jefferson County currently has a contract with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to perform these inspections. Jefferson County Public Works has split up the bridge inspections so that East Jefferson County bridges are inspected in odd -numbered years and West Jefferson County bridges are inspected in even -numbered years. In conformance with that schedule, Jefferson County completed the biennial inspections for all West Jefferson County bridges in 2016, with the exception of the Queets Bridge and the Cassel Creek Bridge, which will be inspected by WSDOT with the UBIT in July 2016. WSDOT will also inspect the Contractors Creek Bridge in East Jefferson County in July 2016. The completed inspection reports are submitted to WSDOT, which then verifies compliance with the NBIS and reports to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). DEFICIENT BRIDGES All bridges are assigned a sufficiency rating (SR), which is a calculated score based on numbers assigned to all of the bridge elements reviewed by the bridge inspector. The SR is a number from 0 to 100, with 100 being an entirely sufficient bridge, and 0 being an entirely insufficient or deficient bridge. For additional explanation of the sufficiency rating and other ratings see the attached WSDOT publication, Bridges and Structures — Ratings (Appendix B). The sufficiency rating is used to determine if a bridge is eligible for federal rehabilitation or replacement funding. Currently, none of the county's bridges have any major deficiencies, and none are eligible for rehabilitation or replacement. As described in previous Bridge Condition reports, the Tower Creek Bridge is being monitored for potential scour problems associated with down -cutting of the streambed. The Tower Creek streambed experienced significant down -cutting in 2007-2008 due to migration of the Hoh River and heavy flows in Tower Creek. However, based on regular monitoring, the streambed elevation has been relatively stable since 2008. Public Works will continue to monitor this situation. Plans for replacement of the Tower Creek Bridge are in the preliminary engineering phase. This project is being managed by the Federal Highway Administration Western Federal Lands Division, and is being funded completely by a Federal Lands Access Program grant. POSTED BRIDGES All bridges are required to have a "Load Rating" calculation. The Load Rating establishes how much weight the bridge can carry for several standard configurations of vehicle axle loads. If the load rating calculation shows that a bridge cannot safely carry the legal traffic loads then the bridge must be posted with the appropriate load limits. Jefferson County currently does not have any bridges with load restrictions. Under a new federal mandate, Jefferson County is required to perform new load ratings on a majority of its' bridges. Under this requirement bridges must be load rated for Specialized Bridge Condition Report 2016 Page 2 of 4 19 Hauling Vehicles. Specialized Hauling Vehicles are defined as closely -spaced, multi -axle, single unit trucks, introduced by the trucking industry in the last decade; examples include dump trucks, construction vehicles, solid waste trucks and other hauling trucks. Jefferson County must perform new load ratings on seven bridges by 12/31/2017, and an additional 18 bridges by 12/31/2022. Public Works estimates that it will cost approximately $150,000 to perform the new load ratings. There is no anticipated federal funding assistance to comply with this federal mandate. Public Works anticipates that the new load ratings could affect the load posting status of some county bridges. OBSOLETE BRIDGES The Old Little Quilcene Bridge and the Maple Creek Bridge have been placed in obsolete status and removed from the Master Bridge List. Both are permanently closed to vehicular traffic. This action removes the requirement for biennial bridge inspection. EMERGENCY REPAIRS There have not been any emergency repairs since the last Bridge Condition Report in 2015. MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES Routine maintenance of the county's bridges is conducted by the road maintenance department. Typical routine maintenance consists of deck cleaning, brush clearing, and minor miscellaneous repairs. COMPLETED PROJECTS Public Works applied for and received $2.97 million in federal funding to repaint the Queets Bridge, which spans the Queets River on Clearwater Road. The painting project was completed successfully in December 2013. It was 100% funded by the Federal Highway Administration. A new bridge was added to the system in 2014. At Andrews Creek on Snow Creek Road at mile post 3.78, a 24 ft. span, pre -cast, reinforced concrete three -sided structure was constructed. This project corrected a fish -passage barrier, and replaced a pair of deteriorated culverts. The project was funded with 100% funding from the Federal Highway Administration. The Hell Roaring Creek Bridge on the Upper Hoh Road was repaired in June 2015 by reattaching the steel angle armor on the southerly end of the bridge. CURRENT PROJECTS Current projects include the following: Bridge Condition Report 2016 Page 3 of 4 20 • A 21 ft. span, pre -cast, reinforced concrete three -sided structure at Upper Hoh Road MP 6.95. Construction will begin on this project in June 2016 and be completed by September 2016. This project is 100% funded by the Federal Highway Administration. • An 80 foot span bridge on West Uncas Rd MP 0.804 is in the final design phase. Construction is scheduled for 2018. This project is being funded by a Salmon Recovery Funding Board grant (approx. 85%), a National Fish Passage Program grant (approx. 10%), and local funds (approx. 5%). PROGRAMMED PROJECTS The culvert at West Valley Road MP 2.55 (Naylor Creek) is programmed to be replaced with an approximate 20 ft. span, fish -passable structure. RECOMMENDED PROJECTS There are no recommended bridge projects at this time. Bridge Condition Report 2016 Page 4 of 4 21 APPENDIX A 23 Jefferson County Public Works Master Bridge List LAST UPDATED: 9/2/15 Total number of bridges in inventory: Total number of permanently closed bridges: Total number of active bridges: Total number of West Jefferson County bridges: Total number of East Jefferson County Bridges 31 2 31 18 active bridges 1 permanently closed bridge 13 active bridges 1 permanently closed bridge 25 U 27 z i o H a ¢� SxavW311 cn xz aF, F W oxa wx � CIO (as),I\.iT:)IA:io'k,l*lVan.LnnaLs Ws) N O M D W O (od) �.t3tcl an .c lnvuouimnd o 0 0 v N p v M 4 00 °O r- o;Nl 7 O 10 M O N m o0 LL O° �D 0O N01.L03dSN1SVI N N N (13aln03a.LN3WdI.lbA Q Q Q fa fa fa F W V cn Gn 'A cn V) rn cn :7 z z z z z z z z z ON1.LVa `JNI.LVa3d00 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 r o 0 O, O O� 10 M7 O VMl .N. v ^, M -• M N M y ONI.LVa ANO.LN3ANi I.O.. M 0 0 010 N Fp. OO �O OO N O Cl M 7 O .z.., 00 N O�a {� OC,� _ N '4R M O .Ni W� r v N W O .N... a3.LSOd GVOn 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 z NOl.LJ3dSN1 a3.LVMa34Nfl 0 0 o 0 0 0 00 0 'IVOI LIaO anoJS 00 0 0 0 0 z z z 53an.Lv3d'IvIO3ds 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 ntlJI,L1aJ 311n.L0tla3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .11108 aV3A rn n rn vi rn of rn v rn c- � rn r rn o o N 3 3 3 3 > N 4 o � o y F ❑ • LL � � � 0 = aGi u � �a b cd E L Q v v¢¢ a L; � UCJ U0.' U0.' U, U, U, U, F'.^.000UUUwUB. V D a m L U U �b D U U 56 o 'L" N abi G U U� m C Im F^ Dr a. fn F (� (1333) H.LON33N 10 N W 7 OM �D M N .LSOdYllh 21 ID Q N N C, oo M M b v� U G '� N 3wVN aVOa Y D 0 0❑° to to 0 o v � b °� v � o x U U a� ox co 264 a' oa a3awnN avou0 M 10 M O\ 0 M O, 0 O M Cl o Vl N CD M O �/t Cl o O Vt C 7 M O Vt N cli C04 gI U U a38Wf1N A.LNnOO m_ w N � N N N w N N a3aWnN3anLOrlaLsnva3a3d O O � D,,p Cl _o Vt O O 7 ,D 6 O O N O O oo Cl O 01 N O Cl w w O O 10 M O O O 10 I a,- cq 10 a 27 SANVW3N (QS)d.N31Old3QA3'7VN[]d.JHN.LS o0 00 00 (O.l) 3.L3'IOSHO A3'lV NOI.LONHd ONI.LVN A3N3101JAAS V01133dSNl SVI U3N1f1a311.LN3Wdlflb:i A A O O cCIO C/I ONI.LVH 9NI.LVN3dO '0o r4o F - z z z z ONI.LVN .INO.LN3ANI FO OO OO M 1.0 a31SOd UVOI z z OZ NOI.LO3dSNl N3.LVMN3ONn O O O O 3VJl.L[NO N[lOOS O O O O 53 N!l.LV3d 3VlO3dS O O O O `IVOI.LINa 3Nf1.LJVNd O O O O - 10 v v .L'lintl NV3A N N o 0 Cq L 7 G C u C G C G C G C q C C C y C p U U U U U v U w° w C7 Ci m ti (J U O m b U U U o � v v r ti M : G CJ a. 'A 10. cn a. Cl) G U CL333) H.LON3-1 0D oD v N .LSOd3'11 W N O r O O M % o 3WVN OVON 0 .c ^' g p F U 3 a cn CD CD rn rn 0 0 0 0 N39WAN OVON ID 7 N y O w C 0 3WVN U czl 3 N38WHN A.LNA03 W N M m M M M M O O O O N3awnN3an.L�na.Ls3va3a3d O � T "' o0 "' 00 '^ 28 29 w o y, N sNavw3a � � w a H� m� (Od),I.J,xIOSIIO A l,lVNOI.LDNHd o M M oo rn o o rn rn (as) I.Ni1IDt.•.IJa t"1'1VNH.LDHmis 01 M O T m N N oo O M DNLLVH ADN3131ldfls 1401LD3dSNl Stl'1 0 0 0 0 0 N 03NIfl(o3N .LN31ti'd1Hd3 Q Q A A q A Q q U, cn un V) F- � � � z p z z z z z zz z ONI.1 tlU DNI.Ltl113do O F. O O O O O O O O �F- N a, M z DNI.Ltla la0LN3ANI O F F O O f OF O M M o o 031SOd avol O O O O O O z z z z Z N0I1D3d SNI H31VA H3aNfl O O O O O O O O O O Z- z z z z z z z z z IVDLLIND NHODS O O O O O O O O O O z z z z lz z lz z z z S91iflIV34 IVIDUS O O O O O O O z Z Z IvalliaD 311fl.LDVBd O O O O O O O Z Z Z a .L'IIHH NV3A <01o a, a, rn rn rn rn rn a w U p C A p C p •. C p C p C N C p C O Uc Q �°, Q x ,p d v d c°, d$ a. �y a d o N ❑�❑ ti ti � p ti 0. C C C C 7. y �' C m Uci uu u U % uu UU UCi uU U¢.a H A m o° o o o o o x o b U .ri (7 U vi U vi C7 .d vi C� vi U y C7 is o Ca V U N C7 E..., P F. N F. R 7 N p a p a b E cirA � a:m aC7 r� W r�GO ria7i nU F=F= rim (133d) H19N31 opo oMo t� - M m .LSOd3'7HA I:M M JK" atlON 5 " a vx a� o o � xx xx xx ux oU cU o a, a311wnN UVOlU ^ rq V 7 v C 7 rn rn rn rn rn C X x axi � 3wtln .. �v o o o U r- X U a� U m a'U sU d r1 F° O xU Q a38wf1N A.L•NaOD 3 N 3 3 3 3 3 30 0 0 0 0 0 O O o IO - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- o O O o O 0 o 0 0 0 0 N38wHN 3Na.LJ�lB,LS 'ItlN3a3d ,� 00 �0 0 w 0 rn 00 Io 7 00 N 00 00 N 00 N 00 M 00 M 00 M 00 O 00 O, [� 29 30 of sNatlw3a U a ASF (03) 313n0sa(} A`r'tICNOr.t;aNn3 �., �o M N o 0 0 ((IS)J,N3fD133t1 M1'1'15'N ;11:7:ra.L O M w °O ao o rn p N w o0 ni 0 00 ci 9NIlV11 A.)N3r.1133nS u011DUSN1 SV'1 0 0 = o 113a1nd3a .LN3 wdiflU3 F pa z z z z z z z z DNI.Ltla DN1,ttla3d o O o 0 0 0 o o � N � 0 � � z z z z z z z z DNLLtla tHO.LN3AN1 O O O O O O O ro O M� O v oNo N O •--' O rq a3.LSOd UVOI O O O O O O O Z N01133dSN1 H31V,Na3(INn OOO O O O O Z Z ntlJltlaOanoo O O O O O O O O z z z z z z z z S3an•Ltl33 •1V1J3dS O O O O O O O O nVJlt1a03antJtlat O O O O z O O C, .tuna atl3.1 OHO o` o N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N U � N a� 7 U at°i a`tli at°i a`°i Q Q U Oq RE � P' V] C (n C (n C V] to [sl 0 u 0 0 0 O U 0 0 0 O O O U� Uvw° vi U'c Uw V vw O vw O vw w c� p 0 0 0 u i a a c o U U b U b b b v b K M r j V j U V V U U U U U (.L333) H.L9N3'1 10 10 10 M N N N N - N .LSOd3'IIw O, N N M n M W .. rn .. N b i O O O O O A 3wtlNatloa U a •d a •d a v a •d rn 0 rn 0 � 0 rn 0 r Cl r- Cl � 0 Cl a39wnNaVoa o x � � V 2 awtlV 21 U y U o x 3u u a 6 ¢H a39wnNALNnOJID 3 3 3 0 3 3 NM M M M M O O [— O O 10 O O 7 O O a, O O oo O O 10 O O vl O O M 1139wnN 3a 113 IMIS'ltla3tl3d C, 01 N V 00 N 00 M 00 �O 00 o0 00 0o 00 ao a0 00 00 30 _ " 31 -,WSDOT - Bridges and Structur� - Ratings AMUL wast,irMterl strata �A D parrirro.nt of Transportation Bridge Ratings The safety of bridge structures in Washington State is ensured through a meticulous inspection system. All public bridge owners, such as WSDOT, Counties and Cities, follow the same bridge inspection procedures. The condition rating of all bridge decks, superstructures and substructures and other elements based on these inspections. USDOT's Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requires all public bridge owners (state, city, and county ) to inspect and their bridges and report information including bridge condition ratings as part of their requirements in the National Bridge Inventory Standards (NBIS). Important aspects of the NBIS were: 1. All states must perform periodic inspections of bridges greater than 20 feet in span on at least a biennial basis. SR6 Wiliapa River bridge Page 1 of 2 SR20 Deception Pass Bridge 2. Data collection was standardized and must be reported to FHWA. 3. Qualifications for inspection personnel were defined. 4. Training programs were developed and implemented. 5. The Bridge Replacement Program (BRP) was established to provide funding for bridge replacement on the system. Structurally Deficient Structurally deficient means that a bridge requires repair or replacement of a certain component. This may include cracked or spalled concrete, the bridge deck, the support structure, or the entire bridge itself. If the condition is such that it no longer is able to carry its intended traffic loads it may be weight restricted. Being structurally deficient does not imply that the bridge is in danger of collapse or unsafe to the traveling public. If a bridge is open then it is considered safe. A bridge is classified as "Structurally Deficient" when bridge inspectors give either the superstructure, deck, and/or substructure a rating of four or less on a scale of zero to nine. WSDOT's poor condition category uses the same data, criteria, and rating scale. 33 http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Bridge/Reporting/BridgeRatings.htm 8/14/2015 WSDOT - Bridges and Structures - Ratings WSDOT has 137 state owned bridges that are classified as structurally deficient as of ]an. 2015. A list of these bridges is available in pdf and web page and map format. Functionally Obsolete Functional obsolescence is assessed by comparing the existing design of each bridge to current standards. A bridge can be categorized functionally obsolete a number of ways including: substandard bridge widths, low vertical clearance that can lead to repeated damage from over height trucks, load -carrying capacity, or flood potential. There are 866 WSDOT bridqes that are rated "Functionally Obsolete" Good, Fair, Poor Condition Rating Page 2 of°2 , Interstate 82 Columbia River bridge near Umatilla Good: A range from no problems to some minor deterioration of structural elements. Fair: All primary structural elements are sound but may have deficiencies such as minor section loss, deterioration, cracking, spalling, or scour. Poor: Advanced deficiencies such as section loss, deterioration, cracking, spalling, scour, or seriously affected primary structural components. Bridges rated in poor condition may be posted with truck weight restrictions. A summary of the WSDOT bridge network conditions is available in the 2014 Bridge Annual Report in the Gray notebook. Copyright WSDOT © 2015 http //www.wsdot.wa.gov/Bridge/Reporting/BridgeRatings.htm 8/14/2015 Bridge inspection Definitions What are "general condition ratings?" According to the National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS), condition ratings are used to describe an existing bridge or culvert compared with its condition if it were new. The ratings are based on the materials, physical condition of the deck (riding surface), the superstructure (supports immediately beneath the driving surface) and the substructures (foundation and supporting posts and piers). General condition ratings range from 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent). For detailed definitions, click here. Which bridges are included in the NBI system? NBI structures are bridges or culverts that carry vehicular traffic and have an opening longer than 20 feet measured along the center of the roadway. What bridges are not considered part of the NBI system? Non-NBI structures include bridges or culverts that carry vehicular traffic and are equal to or less than 20 feet measured along the center of the roadway. VDOT exceeds the NBI standards by inspecting and documenting in our inventory all bridges regardless of their length and all culverts having an opening greater than 36 square feet. What is a "structurally deficient" bridge? Bridges are considered structurally deficient if they have been restricted to light vehicles, closed to traffic or require rehabilitation. Structurally deficient means there are elements of the bridge that need to be monitored and/or repaired. The fact that a bridge is "structurally deficient" does not imply that it is likely to collapse or that it is unsafe. It means the bridge must be monitored, inspected and maintained. How is "structural deficiency" determined? The condition of different parts of a bridge is rated on a scale of 0 to 9 (with 9 being "excellent" and zero being "failed"). A structurally deficient bridge is one for which the deck (riding surface), the superstructure (supports immediately beneath the driving surface) or the substructure (foundation and supporting posts and piers) are rated in condition 4 or less. What makes a bridge structurally deficient, and are structural deficient bridges unsafe? The fact that a bridge is "structurally deficient" does not imply that it is likely to collapse or that it is unsafe. A "deficient" bridge is one with some maintenance concerns that do not pose a safety risk. A "deficient" bridge typically requires maintenance and repair and eventual rehabilitation or replacement to address deficiencies. To remain open to traffic, structurally deficient bridges are often posted with reduced weight limits that restrict the gross weight of vehicles using the bridges. If unsafe conditions are identified during a physical inspection, the structure must be closed. What is a "functionally obsolete" bridge? A functionally obsolete bridge is one that was built to standards that are not used today. These bridges are not automatically rated as structurally deficient, nor are they inherently unsafe. Functionally obsolete bridges are those that do not have adequate lane widths, shoulder widths, or vertical clearances to serve current traffic demand, or those that may be occasionally flooded. 35 A functionally obsolete bridge is similar to an older house. A house built in 1950 might be perfectly acceptable to live in, but it does not meet all of today's building codes. Yet, when it comes time to consider upgrading that house or making improvements, the owner must look at ways to bring the structure up to current standards. What is a "fracture -critical" bridge? A fracture -critical bridge is one that does not contain redundant supporting elements. This means that if those key supports fail, the bridge would be in danger of collapse. This sloes not mean the bridge is inherently unsafe, only that there is a lack of redundancy in its design. What is a bridge's "sufficiency rating?" Sufficiency ratings were developed by the Federal Highway Administration to serve as a prioritization tool to allocate funds. The rating varies from 0 percent (poor) to 100 percent (very good). The formula considers structural adequacy, whether the bridge is functionally obsolete and level of service provided to the public. History of Federal Bridge Inspection Program The federal bridge inspection program regulations were developed as a result of the Federal -Aid Highway Act of 1968 following the collapse of the Silver Bridge in Point Pleasant, West Virginia. The United States Secretary of Transportation established the National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS) to locate and evaluate existing bridge deficiencies to ensure the safety of the traveling public. The 1968 Federal -Aid Highway Act directed the states to maintain an inventory of federal -aid highway system bridges. This was amended over time to establish criteria for NBIS bridges including: • Defining the NBIS to bridges to those on the federal -aid highway system • Requiring inspections of bridges longer than 20 feet on all public roads • Expanding bridge inspection programs to include special inspection procedures for fracture - critical members and underwater inspection 36 Bridge n dition ode key Code Description N NOT APPLICABLE 9 EXCELLENT CONDITION 8 VERY GOOD CONDITION No problems noted. 7 GOOD CONDITION Some minor problems. 6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION Structural elements show some minor deterioration. 5 FAIR CONDITION All primary structural elements are sound but may have some minor section loss (due to corrosion), cracking, spalling (deterioration of concrete surface) or scour (erosion of soil) 4 POOR CONDITION Advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour. 3 SERIOUS CONDITION Loss of section, deterioration, spalling or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION Advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the bridge until corrective action is taken. "IMMINENT" FAILURE CONDITION Major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Bridge is closed to traffic but corrective action may put back in light service. 0 FAILED CONDITION Out of service - beyond corrective action. 37