Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout032717_ca03Department of Public Works O Consent Agenda Page 1 of 1 Jefferson County Board of Commissioners Consent Agenda Request To: Board of Commissioners Philip Morley, County Administrator From: Monte Reinders P.E., Public Works Director/ County Engineer Agenda Date: March 27, 2017 Subject: Digital Submittal Certification - County Road Administration Board - Reports for 2016 Statement of Issue: The County Road Administration Board (CRAB) requires the periodic submittal of forms and documents related to Jefferson County's management of its road system and road fund. By April 1, 2017, the County must submit the following in digital format: (1) Traffic Law Enforcement Expenditure Certification, (2) Fish Passage Barrier Removal Certification, (3) Annual Certification (with attachments), (4) Annual Construction Report, (5) County Arterial Preservation Report, and (6) Maintenance Management Certification. The first three of these items, (See Attached), requires the certification of the Chair of the Board of Commissioners via signatures on a "Digital Submittal Certification" form for mailing to CRAB. Analysis / Strategic Goals / Pros It Cons: CRAB establishes Standards of Good Practice for the administration of the County roads program and road fund. CRAB monitors compliance with these standards via the County's regular submittal of data and certifications. The County Engineer and Board of Commissioners must certify that required standards are being met. Annual issuance of a "Certificate of Good Practice" from CRAB is required in order for the County to receive its annual Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax allocation. Fiscal Impact/Cost Benefit Analysis: Public Works has prepared the required documents with assistance from the Auditor's office and the Sheriff's office. The Certificate of Good Practice is required to receive Jefferson County's annual allocation of approximately $1.3 million in Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax. Recommendation: Authorize the Chair to sign and date the "Digital Submittal Certification" form in the two places for the signature of "Chair / Executive." Return to Public Works for processing Department Contact: Monte Reinders P.E., Public Works Director/County Engineer 385-9242 R iewe2 2-2 7 Phil Morley, Co rator Date CARS Jefferson County Reports for 2016 Digital Submittal Certification for Forms Due April 1st a Page 1 of 2 The documents checked below are hereby submitted from Jefferson County for the review and acceptance of the County Road Administration Board X 2016 RAP Certification of Road Fund Expenditures for Traffic Law Enforcement I hereby certify that the above report is true and accurate and that I have reviewed and approved the report for submission to the County Road Administration Board in accordance with WAC 136 Signed �LP � l Date �_% County Sheriff Signed Date 3 -- -2 County Auditor Signed Date Chair / Executive ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ X 2016 Certification of Road Fund Expenditures for Fish Passage Barrier Removal X 2016 Annual Certification haps //www crab wa gov/cars/ 3/7/2017 CARS Page 2of2 I hereby certify that the Fish Passage Removal and Annual Certifications are true and accurate and that I have reviewed and approved the report for submission to the County Road Administration Board in accordance with WAC 136 Signed Date Chair / Executive Signed Date _____ County Engine__r_......................................................... X 2016 Annual Construction Report X 2016 County Arterial Preservation Report X 2016 Maintenance Management Annual Certification I hereby certify that the Annual Construction Report County Arterial Preservation Report and Maintenance Management Certification are true and accurate and that I have reviewed approved and submitted said reports to the County Road Administration Board in accordance with WAC 136 Sign Date s _____ County En n r https //www crab wa gov/cars/ 3/7/2017 CARS Jefferson County 2016 CERTIFICATION OF ROAD FUND EXPENDITURES FOR TRAFFIC LAW ENFORCEMENT WAC 136-150-022 Page 1 of 1 Total Road Levy Budgeted Road Levy revenue (as listed on the Road Levy Certification - $4 269 169 83 WAC 136-150-021) Actual Road Levy revenue produced $4 273 389 24 Traffic Law Enforcement Paid by Road Lew Diversion Budgeted Road Levy Diversion (as listed on the Road Levy Certification - $720 000 00 WAC 136-150-021) Actual amount of Diverted Road Levy $720 000 00 Was Diverted Road Levy deposited in a specific and identifiable account Yes (RCW 36 82 040) Traffic Law Enforcement Paid by Road Fund Expenditures Budgeted cost reimbursements and/or operating transfers from the Road Fund Actual total amount of cost reimbursements and/or operating transfers from the Road Fund Total Road Portion Traffic Law Enforcement Expenditures $720 000 00 Total Traffic Law Enforcement Expense (ALL COUNTY FUNDS) $875 923 01 RCW 36 79 140 provides that only those counties that during the preceding twelve months have spent all revenues collected for road purposes only for such purposes including traffic law enforcement as are allowed by Article II Section 40 of the Washington State Constitution are eligible to receive funds from the Rural Arterial Trust Account This form must be reviewed and certified (on the Engineer's Certification Form ) by • County Sheriff • County Auditor OR Charter designated Chief Financial Officer • Chair, Board of County Commissioners OR County Executive https //www crab wa gov/cars/ 3/3/2017 Page 1 of 1 FISH PASSAGE CERTIFICATION WAC 136-150-023 Submitting County Jefferson Budget Year 2016 Fish Passaae Barrier Removal Proiects Total Cost % of Total Cost Project Outside of (25% Allowed by Project Name Cost ROW WAC) Access Preservation Hoh $896 963 00 $000 000% Rain Forrest Olympic Nat Park 6 95 Salmon Ceek Bridge - W $21 347 00 $000 000% Uncas Rd MP 0 804 Total Expenditures for Fish Passage Barrier Removal Outside County Rights -of - Way Total Annual Road Construction Budget $3 847 006 00 X 0 005 1/2% of Total Annual Road (Limit of "Outside of Right -of -Way" =$19,235 03 expense) Total Expenditure for Fish Passage Barrier Removal Outside County $000 Right -of -Way RCW 36 79 140 provides that only those counties that during the preceding twelve months have spent all revenues collected for road purposes only for such purposes including removal of barriers to fish passage and accompanying streambed and stream bank repair as specified and limited by RCW 36 82 070 as are allowed by Article II Section 40 of the Washington State Constitution are eligible to receive funds from the Rural Arterial Trust Account 3/10/2017 Page 1 of 2 Jefferson County Annual Certification For Calendar Year 2016 WAC 136-04 MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION A During 2016 the County Engineer performed the duties and had the responsibilities specified in Yes RCW 36 80 030 B At any time during 2016 was there a vacancy/change in the position of county Engineer's If so were the procedures in WAC 136-12 followed? C The processing of County Road Accident Reports during 2016 complied with WAC 136 28 Yes D Priority Programming techniques were applied to the ranking of all potential projects on the arterial Yes road system in 2016 per WAC 136-14-020 E As of December 31 2016 the management of the county road department was in accordance with policies set by the county legislative authority including but not limited to the following specific policies required by WAC 136-50-050 POLICY WAC DATE OF CURRENT VERSION Re Organization 136-50-051 12/14/2015 Re Personnel Practices 136-50-052 11/23/2015 Re Complaint Handling 136-50-053 07/28/2003 Re Work for Others 136-50-054 01/08/2001 Re Utility Accommodation 13650-055 07/08/2000 Re Priority Programming 136-14-030 04/23/2003 F The following were submitted to CRAB in a timely manner G Projects to which construction expenditures were charged were all on the originally adopted 2016 No Annual Program or as amended per WAC 136-16 042 - Attach Amendments (if No please attach a brief explanation ) 3/14/2017 DOCUMENT WAC DUE DATE DATE OF ADOPTION / DATE SENT TO PREPARATION CRAB 16 Six -Year Program 136-15-050 31 -DEC -15 11/23/2015 12/17/2015 16 Annual Construction Program 136-16-040 31 -DEC -15 12/14/2015 12/17/2015 16 CAPP Program 136-300-060 31 -DEC -15 12/14/2015 12/17/2015 16 Road Fund Budget 31 -DEC -15 12/14/2015 12/17/2015 16 Maintenance Management Work 136-11-040 31 -DEC -15 12/14/2015 12/17/2015 Plan & Budget 16 Road Levy 136-150-021 01 -FEB -16 02/01/2016 02/04/2016 15 Certification of Road Fund Exp 136 150-022 01 -APR -16 03/21/2016 03/28/2016 For Traffic Law Enforcement 15 Engineer's Certification of Fish 136 150-023 01 -APR -16 03/21/2016 03/28/2016 Barrier Removal Costs 15 Annual Construction Report 136-16050 01 -APR -16 03/21/2016 03/28/2016 15 CAPP Report 136300-090 01 APR -16 03/21/2016 03/28/2016 15 Maintenance Management 136-11 050 01 -APR -16 03/21/2016 03/28/2016 Certification 15 Annual Certification 136-04-030 01 -APR 16 03/21/2016 03/28/2016 15 Road Log Update 136-60-030 01 -MAY -16 04/26/2016 04/26/2016 16 PMS Certification for CAPA 136-70-070 31 -DEC -16 12/21/2016 12/21/2016 Eligibility G Projects to which construction expenditures were charged were all on the originally adopted 2016 No Annual Program or as amended per WAC 136-16 042 - Attach Amendments (if No please attach a brief explanation ) 3/14/2017 Page 2 of 2 Explanation CR 16260 Donkey Creek Culvert Clearwater Rd MP 1 29 CR 17993 Dowans Creek Road Alignment CR 18730 Paradise Bay Rd Ph 2 MP 0 37-1 53 and CR 19170 1 SRTS SR19 & West Valley Rd — These projects had rollover closeout costs into 2016 as they were Programed projects from 2015 CR 19891 Olympic Discovery Trail (ODT) Discovery Bay to Larry Scott Trail — This project was created through the direction of Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners H The County s construction by county forces limit for 2016 computed in accordance with RCW $1 261 985 00 36 77 065 The actual expenditure for construction by county forces as reported in the 2016 Annual Const $000 Report J As required by WAC 136-20-060 a written Bridge and Inspection Report for 2016 was furnished to 09/12/2016 the legislative authority on (attach a copy) 3/14/2017 (( W t�i 14 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF JEFFERSON In the matter of x Creating a County project Designated as x RESOLUTION NO 35-16 ODT, Discovery Bay to Larry Scott Trail Connection x County Project No 18059519891 x IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that Jefferson County Public Works is authorized to proceed with the Olympic Discovery Trail Discovery Bay to Larry Scott Trail Connection constriction project funded via Recreation Resource Grant (RRG) administered by the Recreation & Conservation Office (RCO) IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that an appropriation from the officially adopted road fund budget and based on the County Engineer's estimate is hereby made in the amounts and for the purpose shown PURPOSE ROAD LEVY RECREATION RESOURCE GRANT Feasibility Study $ 0 $ 100 000 TOTAL $ 0 $ 100 000 This project is included in the officially adopted annual road program as Item Nos X The project is hereby made a part of the officially adopted annual construction program in accordance with R C W 36 81 130 IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that X The construction is to be accomplished by contract in accordance with R C W 36 77 020 et seq The construction is to be accomplished by County forces in accordance with R C W 36 77 065 and WAC 13618 PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS I64-4 DAY OF_a14-� -12q16 � f 1 s � n SEAL. ATTEST Carolyn Avery Deputy Clerk of the Board JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OFF �COMMISSI NERS FA MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners Jefferson County Department of Public Works 623 Sheridan St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 385-9160 Monte Reinders, P.E. Public Works Director/County Engineer FROM: Monte Reinders, P.E., Public Works Director/County Engin DATE: June 15, 2016 SUBJECT: Bridge Condition Report 2016 INTRODUCTION As required by WAC 136-20-060, each county engineer shall furnish the county legislative authority with a written report of the findings of the bridge inspection effort. This report shall be made available to said authority and shall be consulted during the preparation of the proposed six- year transportation program revision. The report shall include the county engineer's recommendations as to replacement, repair or load restriction for each deficient bridge. The resolution of adoption of the six-year transportation program shall include assurances to the effect that the county engineer's report with respect to deficient bridges was available to said authority during the preparation of the program. BRIDGE INVENTORY Jefferson County Public Works has 31 active bridges — see the attached Master Bridge List (Appendix A) for a listing of the county bridges. Jefferson County also has two permanently closed bridges, which are not listed on the Master Bridge List. BRIDGE INSPECTIONS The National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS) and WAC 136-20-030 mandate that public agencies inspect and report on all bridges at least once every two years (routine inspection). Jefferson County staff performs all routine inspections. Special inspections are required for bridges that cannot be inspected adequately from the ground. For these bridges an Under -Bridge Bridge Condition Report 2016 Page 1 of 4 Inspection Truck (UBIT) is required. Steel bridges with fracture critical members may also require special inspections with the UBIT and/or other special equipment. Jefferson County has two bridges which require the UBIT inspection and one bridge which requires both the UBIT and the fracture critical inspection (identified in the attached Master Bridge List). Jefferson County currently has a contract with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to perform these inspections. Jefferson County Public Works has split up the bridge inspections so that East Jefferson County bridges are inspected in odd -numbered years and West Jefferson County bridges are inspected in even -numbered years. In conformance with that schedule, Jefferson County completed the biennial inspections for all West Jefferson County bridges in 2016, with the exception of the Queets Bridge and the Cassel Creek Bridge, which will be inspected by WSDOT with the UBIT in July 2016. WSDOT will also inspect the Contractors Creek Bridge in East Jefferson County in July 2016. The completed inspection reports are submitted to WSDOT, which then verifies compliance with the NBIS and reports to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). DEFICIENT BRIDGES All bridges are assigned a sufficiency rating (SR), which is a calculated score based on numbers assigned to all of the bridge elements reviewed by the bridge inspector. The SR is a number from 0 to 100, with 100 being an entirely sufficient bridge, and 0 being an entirely insufficient or deficient bridge. For additional explanation of the sufficiency rating and other ratings see the attached WSDOT publication, Bridges and Structures — Ratings (Appendix B). The sufficiency rating is used to determine if a bridge is eligible for federal rehabilitation or replacement funding. Currently, none of the county's bridges have any major deficiencies, and none are eligible for rehabilitation or replacement. As described in previous Bridge Condition reports, the Tower Creek Bridge is being monitored for potential scour problems associated with down -cutting of the streambed. The Tower Creek streambed experienced significant down -cutting in 2007-2008 due to migration of the Hoh River and heavy flows in Tower Creek. However, based on regular monitoring, the streambed elevation has been relatively stable since 2008. Public Works will continue to monitor this situation. Plans for replacement of the Tower Creek Bridge are in the preliminary engineering phase. This project is being managed by the Federal Highway Administration Western Federal Lands Division, and is being funded completely by a Federal Lands Access Program grant. POSTED BRIDGES All bridges are required to have a "Load Rating" calculation. The Load Rating establishes how much weight the bridge can carry for several standard configurations of vehicle axle loads. If the load rating calculation shows that a bridge cannot safely carry the legal traffic loads then the bridge must be posted with the appropriate load limits. Jefferson County currently does not have any bridges with load restrictions. Under a new federal mandate, Jefferson County is required to perform new load ratings on a majority of its' bridges. Under this requirement bridges must be load rated for Specialized Bridge Condition Report 2016 Page 2 of 4 Hauling vehicles Specialized Hauling vehicles are defined as closely -spaced, multi -axle, single unit trucks, introduced by the trucking industry in the last decade, examples include dump trucks, construction vehicles, solid waste trucks and other hauling trucks Jefferson County must perform new load ratings on seven bridges by 12/31/2017, and an additional 18 bridges by 12/31/2022 Public Works estimates that it will cost approximately $150,000 to perform the new load ratings There is no anticipated federal funding assistance to comply with this federal mandate Public Works anticipates that the new load ratings could affect the load posting status of some county bridges OBSOLETE BRIDGES The Old Little Quilcene Bridge and the Maple Creek Bridge have been placed in obsolete status and removed from the Master Bridge List Both are permanently closed to vehicular traffic This action removes the requirement for biennial budge inspection EMERGENCY REPAIRS There have not been any emergency repairs since the last Bridge Condition Report in 2015 MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES Routine maintenance of the county s bridges is conducted by the road maintenance department Typical routine maintenance consists of deck cleaning, brush clearing, and minor miscellaneous repairs COMPLETED PROJECTS Public Works applied for and received $2 97 million in federal funding to repaint the Queets Bridge, which spans the Queets River on Clearwater Road The painting project was completed successfully in December 2013 It was 100% funded by the Federal Highway Administration A new bridge was added to the system in 2014 At Andrews Creek on Snow Creek Road at mile post 3 78, a 24 ft span, pre -cast, reinforced concrete three -sided structure was constructed This project corrected a fish -passage barrier, and replaced a pair of deteriorated culverts The project was funded with 100% funding from the Federal Highway Administration The Hell Roaring Creek Bridge on the Upper Hoh Road was repaired in June 2015 by reattaching the steel angle armor on the southerly end of the bridge CURRENT PROJECTS Current projects include the following Bndge Condition Report 2016 Page 3 of 4 • A 21 ft span, pre -cast reinforced concrete three -sided structure at Upper Hoh Road MP 6 95 Construction will begin on this project in June 2016 and be completed by September 2016 This protect is 100% funded by the Federal Highway Administration • An 80 foot span bridge on West Uncas Rd MP 0 804 is in the final design phase Construction is scheduled for 2018 This project is being funded by a Salmon Recovery Funding Board grant (approx 85%), a National Fish Passage Program grant (approx 10%) and local funds (approx 5%) PROGRAMMED PROJECTS The culvert at West Valley Road MP 2 55 (Naylor Creek) is programmed to be replaced with an approximate 20 ft span, fish -passable structure RECOMMENDED PROJECTS There are no recommended bridge projects at this time Bridge Condition Report 2016 Page 4 of 4 APPENDIX A Jefferson County Public Works Master Bridge Last LAST UPDATED 9/2/15 Total number of bridges in inventory Total number of permanently closed bridges Total number of active bridges Total number of West Jefferson County bridges Total number of East Jefferson County Bridges 31 2 31 18 active bridges 1 permanently closed bridge 13 active bridges I permanently closed bridge Last undated 6/15/2nt6 Jefferson County Public Works Master Bridge List East Jefferson County m 4 y V C r U U V m BRIDGE TYPE ,� z z Z = Iccc C m Y F Ueg CC G C 09 it O UHZ LULL1 U =F y2< o < U Ow cc K Uo U z O, 96 Superstructure Substructure 7996700 15E Hunts 634509 Hunt Rd 0 15 27 Reinforced Cone Cone Abutment w/ 1971 NO NO NO 1 18 1 97 STD 4/15/15 88 92 Slab C 1 P conc piles IND I INO (42 TON) (70 TON) 816:)100116E Little 931507 Center Rd 14 6 64 Reinforced Cone Cone Pile cap 1955 NO NO NO 0 63 105 SID 4/15/15 59 75 FO Quilcene Slab Cone Girder Prestress Cone INO IND (22 TON) (37 TON) River piles 8464900 17E Yarr 931507 Center Rd 3 44 25 Cone Multiple Web Cone Abutment w/ 1955 NO NO NO NO 0 66 STD 4/25/16 6461 MONTH INSPECTION Girder Prestress Cone IND 1119 (14 ION) (23 ION) 112 FREQUENCY ilea 8320300 23E Linger 301309 Linger 042 81 Prestress Cone Cone Abutment w/ 1969 NO NO NO NO NO 111 1 49 STD 4/15/15 70 03 Longer Longer Rd Bulb -T Girder Cone column over (32 TON) (53 TON) CIP conc piles 8381400 24E Rocky 250008 Dosewalltps 3 01 47 Prestress Cone Cone Abutment w/ 1964 NO NO NO NO 0 72 120 STD 4/15/15 7699 Brook Rd Bulb -T Girder Cone Spread I INO (25 TON) (43 1 ON) footin 8')29900 25E Meyers 503409 Bclfrage 0 12 30 Timber Timber abutment 1977 NU NO NO NO NO 21 ION 31 TON STD 6/27/13 6358 Rd timber piles 8488200 26E West Uncas 500209 West Uncas 189 61 Remf Cone Slab Cone Abutment 1964 NO NO NO 0 66 1 10 STD 4/15/15 82 17 Rd Cone column over INO INO (23 TON) (39 TUN) C IP cont pie 8136900 28E Leland 344009 Rice Lake 033 32 Prestress Cone Cone Abutment 1987 NU NO NO NO l 59 2 66 STD 4/15/15 8820 Creek Rd Slab Cone spread IND (57 TON) (95 TON) FO footing 8660000 29E Old 3 56 294 Timber Deck Cone Pile cap steel 2000 NO NO NO NO 10 78 l 31 UBIT 7/24/14 8641 UBIT EVERY 4 YEARS — lContractors501409 Creek Gardiner 1 Timber Girders piles INO (28 TON) (47 TON) LAST UGIT 7/12/2012 Rd Page 1 of 2 Jefferson County Public Works Master Bridge List East Jefferson County Page 2 of 2 Ln; co U BRIDGE TYPEF Cd , z F F G Z < O C cc 4 C Q vl a Z .4 L09 w F Z 2 F m Cr F < W % S OF < E W OU z ft / G' C [� > O > Z d d 41 Q J 5z f to 3r. w +7 b' Superstructure Substructure 8754000 31 E Shine Creek 447608 South Point 025 70 Prestress Conc Conc Abutment w/ 2005 NO NO NO NO NO 1 45 176 SID 4/22/15 97 58 Rd Slab Conc Pile (64 ION) (108 CON) 8753900 32E Donovan 327508 E Quilcene 0 77 70 Prestress Conc Conc Abutment w/ 2006 NO NO NO NO NO 1 62 STD 4/15/15 89 28 Creek Rd Slab Conc Pile 1125 (60 TON) (101 TON) 8753800 33E Old Tarboo 357509 Old Tarboo 0 88 42 Prestress Conc Conc Abutment w/ 2005 NO NO NO NO NO 184 307 STD 4/22/15 89 98 Rd Slab steel piles (66 TON) (I I I TON) 8753800 33RE7 Andrews 352909Snow Creek 378 24 Conc 3 sided Box Conc Spread 2014 NO NO NO NO NO 1 23 1 60 (57 STD 4/15/15 91 14 Creek Rd Culvert Footing (44 TON) TON) Page 2 of 2 Jefferson County Public Works Master Bridge List West Jefferson County LastUndnred 6/i4rinif. s m y � 1 F O U m BRIDGE TYPE < O O L C9x F U aC S a m z O a m o 4 i u c i F m ki-- a a Cl O f a a O < O rL = V c�,i ¢ U or t j d 'O U u z 0 o O < W C a z =� e Superstructure Substructure 84� 1600 O l W Fletcher 911607 Quinault S 3 19 78 Prestress Cone Cone Abutment w/ 1974 NO NO NO 098 164 S 1 D 5/10/16 99" Creek Shore Rd Bulb -T Girder CIP cone pile INO �NO (35 TON) (58 TON) 8258500 02W Barlow 134309 Oil City Rd 9 75 64 Prestress Cone Slab Cone Abutment w/ 2005 NO NO NO NO 1 53 199 STD 5/10/16 1111 CIP Cone Pile INO (69 TON) (115 rON) 8145800 03W Anderson 134309 Oil City Rd 444 87 Cone Cone Abutment w/ 1974 NO NO NO NO NO 091 l 52 STD 5/10/16 9043 Creek Feuress ulb-T Girder CIP cone pile (32 TON) (54 TON) 8280100 04W Hell Roaring 914207 Upper Hoh 0 16 120 Prestress Cone Cone Abutment w/ 1982 NO NO NO 131 219 STD 5/10/16 91 88 Creek Rd Girder steel H pile INO INO (47 ION) (78 TON) 8798800 03W Alder Creek 914207 Upper Hoh 2 07 67 Prestress Cone- Cone Abutment w/ 1972 NO NO NO NO 1 11 1 85 STD 5/10/16 9959 Rd Bulb -1 Girder C I P cone pile INO (40 TON) (66 TON) 838360006W Rock Creek 914207 Upper Huh 649 83 Prestress Cone Cone Abutment w/ 1973 NO NO NO NO NO 1 13 189 STD 5/11/16 9210 I Rd Bulb -T Girder CIP toric pile (40 TON) (67 TON) 8384000 07W 914207 Upper Hoh 75 71 Prestress Cone Cone Abutment w/ 1973 NO NO NO NO NO 1 10 1 84 STD 5/11/16 9280 ITowerCreek Rd Bulb -T Girder CIP cone pile (39 TON) (66 TON) 8391000 O8W River 107509 Clearwater 06 844 Steel Plate Girder Cone Piers Cone 1988 NO NO NO 1 79 UBIT 7/24/14 9111 UBIT EVERY 4 YEARS lQueets; Rd C IP cone deck Abutment w/ steel H INO �NO 1107 (38 TON) (64 'ION) LAST UBIT 7/1012012 pile 8047800 09W Hemphill 146809 Dowaits 23 31 Timber Deck Timber abutment 1977 NO NO NO TON 31 TON STD 1111/16 6039 Creek Creek Rd Timber Girders timber piles INO �NO 121 7966600 IOW Dowens 146809 Dowans 0 52 81 Prestress Con c Cone Abutment w/ 1974 NO NO NO NO NO 1 IO 1 84 STD 5111/16 9379 Creek Creek Rd Bulb C Girder 1 C I P cone pile I 1(39 TON) (66 TON) Page 1 of 2 Jefferson County Public Works Master Bridge List West Jefferson County l—t llednlwl 6116/2016 m �O m F F Z p U - m 47 m v W BR1BGh 1-YPE s 7 t a 0 z a a 6- awe h C f < 47 Y < v m T L U L S C h � F C L O F m F a ae a d O I- m v O Tr < < O < O Z m << W fr m iUi eL O z Superstructure Substructure 8475700 11 W Owl Creek 135109 Maple 129 69 Prestress Cone Slab Cone Abutment w/ 1989 NO NO NO NO NO 136 227 STD 5/10/16 8345 Creek Rd steel H piles (49 TON) (81 ION) FO 8253600 13W Hurst Creek 107509 Clearwater 266 67 Prestress Cone Cone Abutment 1969 NO NO NO NO NO 103 1 72 STD 5/10/16 98 86 Rd Bulb -T Girder Cone column, Cone (37 ION) (61 rON) footing 8339400 27W Willoughby 914207 Upper Hoh 3 52 60 Prestress Cone Cone Pile cap w/ 1962 NO NO NO NO 012 1 37 STD 5/11/16 59 03 Creek Rd Bulb -T Girder Prestress Cone piles INO (29 TON) (49 TON) 8659900 30W Cassel Creek 134309 Oil City Rd 359 154 Steel Girder Cone Pile cap steel 2000 YES NO NO NO NO 1 19 200 UBIT 7/1114 7252 Fraciw Cni¢al Special lnspe i — piles (43 TON) (72 TON) FO WSD01 im 10Spcc1 wnh m�rf L BIT inlly 8829800 34W Pole Creek 914207 Upper Hoh 83 37 Cone 3 sided Box Cone Spread 2010 NO NO NO NO I I 1 144 STD 5/11/16 92 80 Rd Culvert Foutini, IND (50 TON) 1(65 TON) 8845600 35W Dismal Creek 914207 Upper Hoh 919 22 Cone 3 sided Box Cone Spread 201 I NO NO NO NO 1 1 3 STD 5/11/16 9100 Rd Culvert Footing INO (36 TON) (46 TON) 8853500 36W Spruce Creek 914207 Upper Hoh 97 22 Cone 3 sided Box Cone Spread 2012 NO NO NO NO NO 1176 1 465 STD 5/11/16 92 80 Rd Culvert Footing (42 TON) (52 TON) 8863300137W 914207 Upper Hoh 2 IS 25 Cone 3 sided Box Cone Spread 2013 NO NO NO NO NO 1 29 STD 5/10/16 91 I I �AlderCreek Tributary Rd Culvert Footing 11110 (36 TON) (46 TON) Page 2 of 2 APPENDIX B MSDOT - Bridges and Structure - Ratings ANIL �/ — wast,irpQton State Department of Transportation Bridge Ratings The safety of bridge structures in Washington State is ensured through a meticulous inspection system. All public bridge owners, such as WSDOT, Counties and Cities, follow the same bridge inspection procedures. The condition rating of all bridge decks, superstructures and substructures and other elements based on these inspections. USDOT's Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requires all public bridge owners (state, city, and county ) to inspect and their bridges and report information including bridge condition ratings as part of their requirements in the National Bridge Inventory Standards (NBIS). Important aspects of the NBIS were: i. All states must perform periodic inspections of bridges greater than 20 feet in span on at least a biennial basis. SR6 Wiliapa River bridge Page I of 2 SR20 Deception Pass Bridge 2. Data collection was standardized and must be reported to FHWA. 3. Qualifications for inspection personnel were defined. 4. Training programs were developed and implemented. 5. The Bridge Replacement Program (BRP) was established to provide funding for bridge replacement on the system. Structurally Deficient Structurally deficient means that a bridge requires repair or replacement of a certain component. This may include cracked or spalled concrete, the bridge deck, the support structure, or the entire bridge itself. If the condition is such that it no longer is able to carry its intended traffic loads it may be weight restricted. Being structurally deficient does not imply that the bridge is in danger of collapse or unsafe to the traveling public. If a bridge is open then it is considered safe. A bridge is classified as "Structurally Deficient" when bridge inspectors give either the superstructure, deck, and/or substructure a rating of four or less on a scale of zero to nine. WSDOT's poor condition category uses the same data, criteria, and rating scale. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Bridge/Reporting/BridgeRatings.htm 8/14/2015 WSDOT - Bridges and Structures - Ratings WSDOT has 137 state owned bridges that are classified as structurally deficient as of ]an. 2015. A list of these bridges is available in pdf and web page and map format. Functionally Obsolete Functional obsolescence is assessed by comparing the existing design of each bridge to current standards. A bridge can be categorized functionally obsolete a number of ways including: substandard bridge widths, low vertical clearance that can lead to repeated damage from over height trucks, load -carrying capacity, or Flood potential. There are 866 WSDOT bridges that are rated "Functionally Obsolete" Good, Fair, Poor Condition Rating Page 2 of -Z Interstate 82 Columbia River bridge near Umatilla Good: A range from no problems to some minor deterioration of structural elements Fair: All primary structural elements are sound but may have deficiencies such as minor section loss, deterioration, cracking, spalling, or scour. Poor: Advanced deficiencies such as section loss, deterioration, cracking, spalling, scour, or seriously affected primary structural components. Bridges rated in poor condition may be posted with truck weight restrictions. A summary of the WSDOT bridge network conditions is available in the 2014 Bridge Annual Report in the Gray notebook. Copyright WSDOT © 2015 http://www.wsdot.wa.govBridge/Reporting/BridgeRatings.htm 8/14/2015 Bridge inspection Definitions What are "general condition ratings?" According to the National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS), condition ratings are used to describe an existing bridge or culvert compared with its condition if it were new. The ratings are based on the materials, physical condition of the deck (riding surface), the superstructure (supports immediately beneath the driving surface) and the substructures (foundation and supporting posts and piers). General condition ratings range from 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent). For detailed definitions, click here. Which bridges are included in the NBI system? NBI structures are bridges or culverts that carry vehicular traffic and have an opening longer than 20 feet measured along the center of the roadway. What bridges are not considered part of the NBI system? Non-NBI structures include bridges or culverts that carry vehicular traffic and are equal to or less than 20 feet measured along the center of the roadway. VDOT exceeds the NBI standards by inspecting and documenting in our inventory all bridges regardless of their length and all culverts having an opening greater than 36 square feet. What is a "structurally deficient" bridge? Bridges are considered structurally deficient if they have been restricted to light vehicles, closed to traffic or require rehabilitation. Structurally deficient means there are elements of the bridge that need to be monitored and/or repaired. The fact that a bridge is "structurally deficient' does not imply that it is likely to collapse or that it is unsafe. It means the bridge must be monitored, inspected and maintained. How is "structural deficiency" determined? The condition of different parts of a bridge is rated on a scale of 0 to 9 (with 9 being "excellent" and zero being "failed"). A structurally deficient bridge is one for which the deck (riding surface), the superstructure (supports immediately beneath the driving surface) or the substructure (foundation and supporting posts and piers) are rated in condition 4 or less. What makes a bridge structurally deficient, and are structural deficient bridges unsafe? The fact that a bridge is "structurally deficient' does not imply that it is likely to collapse or that it is unsafe. A "deficient" bridge is one with some maintenance concerns that do not pose a safety risk. A "deficient' bridge typically requires maintenance and repair and eventual rehabilitation or replacement to address deficiencies. To remain open to traffic, structurally deficient bridges are often posted with reduced weight limits that restrict the gross weight of vehicles using the bridges. If unsafe conditions are identified during a physical inspection, the structure must be closed. What is a "functionally obsolete" bridge? A functionally obsolete bridge is one that was built to standards that are not used today. These bridges are not automatically rated as structurally deficient, nor are they inherently unsafe. Functionally obsolete bridges are those that do not have adequate lane widths, shoulder widths, or vertical clearances to serve current traffic demand, or those that may be occasionally flooded. A functionally obsolete bridge is similar to an older house A house built in 1950 might be perfectly acceptable to live in but it does not meet all of today s budding codes Yet when it comes time to consider upgrading that house or making improvements the owner must look at ways to bring the structure up to current standards What is a "fracture -critical" bridge? A fracture -critical bridge is one that does not contain redundant supporting elements This means that if those key supports fad the bridge would be in danger of collapse This does not mean the bridge is inherently unsafe only that there is a lack of redundancy in its design What is a bridge's "sufficiency rating?" Sufficiency ratings were developed by the Federal Highway Administration to serve as a priontization tool to allocate funds The rating vanes from 0 percent (poor) to 100 percent (very good) The formula considers structural adequacy whether the bridge is functionally obsolete and level of service provided to the public History of Federal Bridge Inspection Program The federal bridge inspection program regulations were developed as a result of the Federal -Aid Highway Act of 1968 following the collapse of the Silver Bridge in Point Pleasant West Virginia The United States Secretary of Transportation established the National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS) to locate and evaluate existing bridge deficiencies to ensure the safety of the traveling public The 1968 Federal -Aid Highway Act directed the states to maintain an inventory of federal -aid highway system bridges This was amended over time to establish criteria for NBIS bridges including • Defining the NBIS to bridges to those on the federal -aid highway system • Requiring inspections of bridges longer than 20 feet on all public roads • Expanding bridge inspection programs to include special inspection procedures for fracture - critical members and underwater inspection Bridge andition Code key Code Description N NOT APPLICABLE 9 EXCELLENT CONDITION 8 VERY GOOD CONDITION No problems noted. 7 GOOD CONDITION Some minor problems. 6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION Structural elements show some minor deterioration. 5 FAIR CONDITION All primary structural elements are sound but may have some minor section loss (due to corrosion), cracking, spalling (deterioration of concrete surface) or scour (erosion of soil) 4 POOR CONDITION Advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour. 3 SERIOUS CONDITION Loss of section, deterioration, spalling or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION Advanced deterioration of primary structural elements_ Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the bridge until corrective action is taken. "IMMINENT" FAILURE CONDITION Major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Bridge is closed to traffic but corrective action may put back in light service. 0 FAILED CONDITION Out of service - beyond corrective action.