HomeMy WebLinkAboutHabitat Assessment 932200706 1 of 3de
Residence and Septic Development at
1196 Beckett Point Rd. (lots #6 and 7),
Fort 'Townsend, WA 98368
4
Habitat Assessment
aTIP
For: MAR 3 0 2017
Mike Millikan (lot #6) JEFFERSON COUNTY DCC
and
Shane & Jillian Cline
4702 227th St. SW.
Mountlake Ten -ace, WA 98043
E S ZI h_qq�*�
Is
P
'N.,� -8 S S M
MARINE SURVEYS 6t ASSESSMENTS
267 Hudson Street
Port Townsend WA 98368
(360)385-4073
marine.surveys.inc@gmail.com
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION.......................................................... .....................4
2. PROJECT INFORMATION...................................................................4
A. Applicant Information.......................................................................4
B. Project Location................................................................................4
C. Project Description............................................................................4
D. Action Area.......................................................................................4
3. HABITAT AND SPECIES INFORMATION ..................................... 4-5
4. EFFECTS ANALYSIS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT......................6
A. Direct Effects....................................................................................6
B. Indirect Effects..................................................................................6
C. Interrelated/Interdependent Effects ..................................... .............. 7
1.7ete-MiWa[lon of Effects .
5. l'ratecliti�c Nl�'�s��res ,..................................,.,..,.... ,,.......,......... .7
,
�� .8................,..............,..............,...................................8
REFERENCES........................................................................................9
yr yg
M5&A Cline Residential Development Project- 2
FIGURES ----------`~^^^.^^`~—''^^^^^^'~'~-...__.-..'104|
iProject Location ......................................... .................................
... 10
2.Parcel Map ........... ................................................. ...............
......... \I
ISite Plan ............................... ...........................................................
l2
4. Site Plan Survey ............................................................ ................... 13
5.Main Floor Plan ...~^.~....~------..—..~~.~..._--..--.\4
6.Second Floor Plan ............................................................................
l5
7. Roof Plan ................... ................................... _......—.----..l6
8.Eastern Elevation .................................. ..........................................
{7
9.Western Elevation ...................................................... ---_—^—\8
l0.North and South Elevation ....... ....................................................
|9
ll.Section A .—~—.---20
l2.Section 8 ............. .............. ...........................................................
2l
13. Septic � SitcPlan ............ ...................................................
--..-22
l4.Septic Detail Plan .......................................................... —
.............. 23)
\5.Septic Detail Plan ...................................... ................. ...................
24
lh.Septic [)cta191uu------.--..—...—.--.—..—....---�5
|7.Septic Construction Details .......................... ........... ...............
...26
l8.FEMA Flood Map .............. ................................ ....................
—.27
19. WDFW Forage Fish Map .......... .................... .......................
_.... 28
20. lP[}(]E Coastal Atlas Eelgruan Presence ...................... ................
29
2l.WD(JE.Coastal Atlas Drift Cells ---....-------.----70
22. Jefferson County Shore Form Types ...........................................
..]0
23. Coastal Atlas Coastal [audforu/o......... ...................................
.... 3O
24. Jefferson County Critical Areas Seismic Hazard Mop------}[
25. Jefferson- County Critical Areas Shoreline Slope Stability Mop—]|
Z6-27.W[)FWPriority Habitats and Species Report ... --...........
3) 2 -33
28.WD(}EOblique Aerial Photograph o{the Site ..............................
34
29-35. Site Pictures ........................................................................
]5-30
36-40. Site Pictures: Vegetation ooSite ....................... ................
�9'4\
ATTACHMENTS
Cline Residential Development Project
1. INTRODUCTION
The current proposal is to construct two single-family homes and septic systems on two lots, #6 and 7 on Beckett
Point in Jefferson County, WA. The site is located in a FEMA Frequently Flooded Area (Figtwe 18). In accordance
with the requirements noted in the Jefferson County Code (JCC) 18.15.15, the following Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FNMA) I-labitat Assessment has been prepared for this project.
The project location is seen in Figures 1 and 2.
2. PROJECT INFORMATION
A. Applicant Information
Jillian Cline
Mailing Address: 4702 227th St. SW, Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043
Phone: (425) 501-5791
Email: jillian.a.gantc boeing:com
B. Project Location
1196 Beckett Point Rd. (lots #6 and 7), Port Townsend, WA 98368
Parcel #932 200 707, Jefferson County
Section 23, Township 30 N., Range 02 W.
Lat. 48004'39.84"N. Longi. 12253'05.85"W
C. Project Description
The proposed project consists of construction new residences approximately 45' by 20' ( 900 sgft.) and
Parking area measures two 9 x 18' ( 162 sgf( each) (Figm-es 3-10) on each of the two lots, # 6 and 7.
Additionally each lot will also have a septic system grinder pump with associated transport lines installed
in one of the proposed parking areas between the residence and Beckett Point Road. Typical grading,
level and filling will be undertaken ( Figm-es 11-17).
According to Jefferson Country, the Historical Building Line is acceptable per the submitled field Survey
by NTI Engineering and the structures will be built up to the Historical Line setbacks as measured in the
field and labeled on NTl survey ( Figm-e 4)
According to the house plans, the elevation of the ground floor will be one feet above Base Flood Iaevation (BIT)
of 9' (Figures 8-10).
D. Action Area
Tile action area should include the area within a `/ mile radius of the project location. This area includes noise
effects from construction activities.
3. HABITAT AND SPECIES INFORMATION
A. Habitat
One field investigation at the project site was conducted on January 6"', 2017. The following is a description ofthe
habitat noted in the project area (Figures 28-35):
The dominant vegetation on the property is unidentified grass (most likely lawn species).
There is small cover of the following species: American sea rocket (Cakile eclewulct) and fat hen (,41i-iples patztict)
�orowing nearest the water. interspersed with trace amounts of dune grass (Leymus mollis). Scattered throu�1h the
trace dune grass on the lot is yellow sand -verbena (Abrotria lalifolict). See Figures 36 to 40 for site vegetation.
Note since the silo visit was done in the ti inter, some the gttcmlities and identities of the plants above maY be
inaccurrale.
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project- 4
According to WDOE, there are patchy eelgrass beds in the subtidal area of the shoreline (Figure 20). The Jefferson
County Critical Areas map indicates that the site area is in an "Intermediate" slope stability area (Figure 25).
According to the DOE Coastal Atlas, this location is at the end of a drift cell that is from east to west or from right
to left when facing the shore from the water (Figure 21) and The Coastal Landform is listed as an "Modified and
Accretion Shoreform" (Figures 22- 23).
There is Herring spawning just offshore of the project site according to Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife (WDFW 2017, Figure 19).
(littp://�ydfw.wa.gov/conservatiott/reseal•cli/i)roiects/alai-iiie_beacti sl2awnin�vVil dex.htnil).
B. Species
Figures 26-27 show the Priority Habitats and Species present in the area (WDFW 2017. Priority Habitats and
Species. Available at: http://Nvdfiv.wa.gov/tnapping/plis/. Olympia, Washington). The project site area is adjacent to
"Aquatic Habitat".
Federally Listed Species That May be Present in the Area:
In the project vicinity, there are two salmon species, Hood Canal summer -run chum (Oncorhynchus kela) and
Puget Sound chinook (Oncorhynchzrs Ishawylscha), listed under the Endangered Species Act as threatened species
according to tle National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)(Federal Register, Vol. 64, Nos. 56 and 57).
NMFS also listed the Puget Sound steelhead (Oncorlrynchus invkiss) as a threatened species under tile ESA
(Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 91 / Friday, May 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations).
Bull trout (Salvelinus conflitenlus) were listed as threatened by tle United States Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) in October of 1999.
On April, 23, 2009, NOAA listed the distinct population segments (DPSs) ofyelloweye and canary rockfish as
threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and proposed that the Georgia Basin DPS of bocaccio
be listed as endangered. According to NOAA (Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 81 / April 28, 2010 / Rules and
Regulations), the area for the proposed listed rockfish includes all of Puget Sound south of Admiralty Inlet. The
Georgia Basin refers to all of Puget Sound, including the area around the San Juan Islands, and the Strait of
Georgia north to the mouth of the Campbell River in British Columbia. The western boundary of the Georgia Basin
runs from east of Port Angeles to Victoria in the Strait of Juan de Fuca.
Critical habitat was designated for these three DPSs (Federal Resister / Vol 79, No 219 / Thursday, November 13,
2014 / Final Rule). The site shoreline is in the critical habitat shoreline area for juvenile canary and bocaccio
rockfish. However, NMFS is proposing to remove canary rockfish fi-om the federal list of threatened and
Endangered Species (07/06/2016).
On September 2, 2005, NMFS issued the final rule designating critical habitat for 12 Evolutionarily Significant
Units (ESUS) of West Coast salmon, including the Puget Sound Chinook Salmon ESU and the Hood Canal
Summer -run Chum ESU. The project site is in the designated area for the Puget Sound Chinook and Hood Canal
Summer -run ESUS (Federal Register / Vol 70, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2005 / Rules and Regulations).
Critical habitat has been designated for Pacific steelhead (Federal Register / February 24, 2016 / Final Rule).
On November 15, 2005 NMFS listed the Southern Resident killer whale (Orcinus orca) as endangered under ESA
(Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 222 / November 18, 2005 / Rules and Regulations). NOAA Fisheries has
designated critical habitat for killer whales (Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 229 / November 29, 2006 / Final
Rule). "Critical habitat includes waters deeper than 20' relative to a contiguous shoreline delimited by the line of
extreme high water." Therefore, the project site is not in an area designated as critical habitat for the Southern
Resident killer whales.
The project site is on a shoreline designated as critical habitat for Coastal -Puget Sound bul I trout (Federal Register
/ Vol. 75, No. 200 / October 18, 2010 / Rules and Regulations).
Marbled murrelets (Brachyrainphus warmoralats) have also been listed as threatened by the USFWS since 1992.
There is no murrelet critical habitat near the site (Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 102/ 1996).
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project- 5
4. EFFECTS ANALYSIS OF PROPOSED PROJECT
The status of each of the listed species in the action area has been provided. The project has been described and the
action area defined. When reviewing all the data, the direct and indirect effects of the project on the listed species
and their critical habitat should be considered.
A. Direct Effects: When considering the direct effects of the proposed project, one must determine if the proposed
project will immediately reduce or destroy the listed species and/or their habitat. The potential direct impacts
caused by the construction process, followed by means to address them, include the following:
1. There may be siltation caused by soil erosion and runoff during construction and land preparation. Any siltation
has the potential to impact migrating salmonids in the nearshore area.
Siltation in the nearshore during construction will be avoided by the implementation of the Best Management
Practices (BMP) outlined in the Stormwater Drainage, Erosion, and Sediment Control Plan submitted for this
project.
2. There will be some construction noise associated the project, which may have temporary impacts on wildlife.
Potential impacts to wildlife due to construction will be minimal. There may be some distUrbance of
nesting/perching for song birds. In addition, construction of the single family residence is removed from the
nearshore, so movement of fish should not be interrupted.
3. Decreased number of native or non-native plants: The proposed house footprint will displace some dune grass.
This impact to habitat function will be rectified by the planting of a variety of native vegetation at the project site
and at the second parking area near the lagoon. In addition, the area around the perimeter of the house footprint that
is disturbe )y constructrnn wi )e n et with dune grass and yellow sand -verbena. See the details in Attachment
1. 'I� i 5 n C`.c9�(`(' C'�, I'f' s +o Q` t � t 4-�I" r 1rt fyK { S (0 P t
The project site is adjacent to an area identified by FEMA as a protected area. Because of this, the impacts on the
following issues need to be addressed:
a. Does the project involve the removal of native vegetation? Yes, see above.1, T
cb. Does the project include channel straightening? No.
c. Does theroject result in habitat isolation? No. nC
p J 0
d. Does the project include bank armoring? No.
e. Does the project reduce flood storage capacity? No.
f. Does the project result in degradation of water quality? No
g. Will there be construction effects (noise or turbidity)? Yes, see above.
h. Will there be impacts to floodplain refugia for ESA -listed fish. No impacts are expected as a result of this
project.
i. Will the project impact spawning substrate. No impacts are expected to spawning substrate.
j. Does the project impact flood volumes and flood velocities. No. Tile foundation will be designed so that it is
4.25' above grade and engineered with flow through and venting.
B. Indirect Effects: When considering the indirect effects of the proposed project on the listed species and their
habitat, one must determine the effects that might occur later in time, after completion of the project.
The impacts caused by the increase in impervious surface area will be avoided by the Best Management Practices
(BMP) outlined in the Stormwater Drainage, Erosion, and Sediment Control Plan submitted for this project.
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project• 6
C. Interrelated/Interdependent Effects:
Completion of this project will not promote future construction or other activities that would not otherwise occur
without its completion. Therefore, no additional interrelated or interdependent actions that could affect species
regulated -under ESA will occur because of this project.
D. Take Analysis:
The ESA (Section 3) defines "take" as to "harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, trap, capture, collect or
attempt to engage in any such conduct." The USFWS further defines "harm" as "significant habitat modification or
degradation that results in death or injury to listed species by significantly impairing behavioral patterns such as
breeding, feeding, or sheltering." It is likely that no "take" will result from this project.
E. Determination of Effect:
After reviewing the appropriate data and surveys, the determination of effect is:
1. Puget Sound chinook - "May affect, not likely to adversely affect"
?. Hood Canal Stuntner-run Churn — "May affect, not likely to adversely affect"
3. Bocaccio, yelloweye and canary rockfish - "May effect, not likely to adversely affect"
4. Bull trout - "May affect, not likely to adversely affect"
.5. Puget Sottnd steelhead - "May affect, not likely to adversely affect"
6. Marbled murrelet -"May affect, not likely to adversely affect"
F. No Net Loss Analysis
All measures have been taken to avoid and minimize potential impacts resulting from the proposed project. A
mitigation plan has been developed for this property to enhance the buffer and retain ecological function or values.
In consideration of the unlikely impact to ESA species as well as the proposed mitigation suggested below, we
determine that no -net -loss of ecological function will result from this project's unavoidable impacts due to its'
water dependent use. Additionally we believe that this project reflects the goal of the Shoreline Master Program by
balancing access to the environment with the protection of that environment.
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project- 7
5. Protective Measures
A. Mitigation Planting Plan
A buffer enhancement planting plan has been developed as mitigation for this project. This plan was designed to
increase the amount of native plant species in the shoreline buffer on the property as well as to retain and ensure no
net -loss of ecological functions and values of the shoreline. Please find the plan and map in Attachment 1 below.
B. Siltation Management: Several methods are suggested to prevent siltation in the Washington State Department
of Ecology's STORM WATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN, often termed
"the Technical Manual" (WDOE 2012).
The following precautions for siltation prevention during construction processes are
suggested in Volume II "Construction Slorrmmater Pollution Prevention" in the
Storinivaler Management Manual for TVesler•n Kishinglon. These Best Management
Practices (BMPs) are as follows:
• BMP C101: Preserving Natural Vegetation
• BMF C102: Buffer Zones
• BMP C103: High Visibility Fence
• BMP C105: Stabilized Construction Entrance / Exit
• BMP C106: Wheel Wash
■ BMP C107: Construction Road/Parking Area Stabilization
• BMP C120: Temporary and Permanent Seeding
■ BMP C121: Mulching
• BMP C122: Nets and Blankets
■ BMP C123: Plastic Covering
■ BMP C124: Sodding
• BMP C125: Topsoiling / Composting
■ BMP C126: Polyacrylamide (PAM) for Soil Erosion Protection
• BMP C130: Surface Roughening
• BMP C131: Gradient Terraces
• BMP C140: Dust Control
• BMP C150: Materials on Hand
• BMP C151: Concrete Handling
■ BMP C152: Sawcutting and Surfacing Pollution Prevention
• BMP C153: Material Delivery, Storage and Containment
• BMP C154: Concrete Washout Area
■ BMP C160: Certified Erosion and Sediment Control Lead
• BMP C162: Scheduling
Please refer to Volume II "Conslruclion Stol-inivater Pollrtlion Prevention" in the
Sloi-mli>ater- ,Vcrnagerrzent Manila/ for Wesler•n Washington for BMP details.
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project• 8
REFERENCES
Federal Register/ Vol. 61, No. 102 /May 24, 1996 / Rules and Regulations.
Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 56 / March 24, 1999 / Rules and Regulations.
Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 57 / March 25, 1999 / Rules and Regulations.
Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 210 / November 1, 1999 / Rules and Regulations.
Federal Register / Vol 70, No. 170 / Friday, September 2, 2005 / Rules and Regulations.
Federal Register, Vol. 70, No. 222 /November 18, 2005 / Rules and Regulations.
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 229 / November 29, 2006 / Rules and Regulations.
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 91 / Friday, May 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations.
Federal Register 1 Vol. 75, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations.
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 200 /Monday. October 18, 2010 / Rules and Regulations.
Federal Resister / Vol 79, No 219 / Thursday, November 13, 2014 / Final Rule
Federal Resister / February 24, 2016 / Final Rule
Jefferson County. 2016. Critical Areas Maps. Port Townsend, WA.
http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/idmshnapsei-ver.slitml
WDFW (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2017. Priority Habitats and Species report. Available at:
littp:Hwdfw.wa.gov/mapping/phs/. Olympia, Washington.
WDOE (Washington Department of Ecology). 2017. Washington State Coastal Atlas Map. Available at:
https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/coastalatlas/tools/Map.aspx. Olympia, Washington.
WSDE (Washington State Department of Ecology). 2016. Slot-Iiiii,tifel'tIIQlKlgeii7el7J AIantrcrl for Meslern
TT�tshing1077. Washington State Department of Ecology, Water Quality Program. Olympia, WA. 1035 pp.
http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/stormwatei-/manual.litm I
MSS,A Cline Residential Development Project- 9
Figure 1. Project Locations
X
AY'T VECAEU Pwr
n9ma's am
SITE i
0/1
NOR1I
LOCATION MAP
SCALE. 1'=10,000'
SECT 24
W77� GOV LOT 2
SECT 23
GOV LOT31
SECT 24
GOV LOT 2
SITEwo'f
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1'=1000'
SECT 24
GOV LOT 3
so
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project- 10
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project• 1 1
v
Figure 3. Site plan
C,
a n J
r,
1�
v
>000 _v1'
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project- 12
C Qir4
m
r
FSI
W I"ry
1
<n
ch
G
Z
C,
a n J
r,
1�
v
>000 _v1'
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project- 12
C Qir4
�i1
FSI
W I"ry
C,
a n J
r,
1�
v
>000 _v1'
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project- 12
�1
vi ^'
x
Figure 4. Survey Site Plan Map
_
to Z
BN
ii 0
, CO
)m
m
O o
S
f
I]lli N 8 S
71
h 6'I m Vii £ O N G / Z� P•
1
rn
Ln
hV
E
vi ^'
x
ah
_
to Z
ii 0
, CO
)m
m
~
F
P
S T
N �rnml p
Z N %ul
!
R
uu11
r O �
M
^ .
�R}
;r`7 99,�fi1
4 0
1
rn
Ln
hV
E
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project- 13
vi ^'
x
u
eD
m
R
^ .
4 0
'1
IQ
I
0
Aga
iry
®
orJ
ty
I.
I
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project- 13
Figure S. Main Floor Plan
-.0
MS&A
Cline Residential Development Project- 14
V
Pit
Figure 6. Second Floor Plan
A
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project- 15
Figure 7. Roof Plan
I
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project• 16
-egg
MS&A
P
Figure 8. Eastern Elevation
_-T
Cline Residential Development Project• 17
MS&A
Figure 9. Western Elevation
4
Cline Residential Development Project• 18
Figure 10. North and South Elevation
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project- 19
Figure 11. Section A
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project• 20
Figure 12. Section B
T-- - — — — — — -- -7
Lv
i
I _
VIP
.-•. __ -- ; C : 11 -_-- I.I _ _
di7-Lit—
-----------
Ifni
I LLL
a 1 11 1 I
I
-
1 -
I
�1
N� rn
o_
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project- 21
Figure 13. Septic Site Plan
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project- 22
Tia
,jog
-'3
n�
€
All
"{ zg
'o
C[F.F•-
2-[O
SS
g �
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project- 22
Figure 14. Septic Detail Plan
2
rz
� b
�
�Do
O
Y'
m,�
to
Eg m
P -
o�q
�
F
re
Z
�^2 A
.i
0
N�6
� b
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project- 23
Figure 15. Septic Detail Plan
s
.. Y
qq
S
rz
Cn
M
s.
`'
X
-
it
8
ni
Loo
(/)
m-0
" C
�;
o
r^�
{
l r
co
<
r
v
/
f
.lnL
1
q
_{
_m m
a?
aN `'
I
1
n
m
mea
$ m
�F
z
f i
f�.
... '
0
Ujz
wgv�0
� x
!
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project- 24
N rZ
N
Figure 16. Septic Detail Plan
M
r
a
M5&A Cline Residential Development Project- 25
alp
-A
z
D I
N
o
R iO
ia
g'
M
r
a
M5&A Cline Residential Development Project- 25
Figure 17. Septic Construction Details
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project- 26
i 7
n
A"OP
4
µi 'i -Lin -5$
epi
c�k
Yi ~ a'9} k'.r
/meq
T��}�..
''Vy'T.1
Z�ii S_
FT.',}kM�
#b^G
i�Y
�x"gcl,-•aani
y1i
'DV-Tj
�j2
i y%
WRY.
'i
Ji
�Yn
O
A
TI
�•Q� Z^
�•it. ���^ ' G�yl2h���an
V
s
3'
V
�
n
33
o;M
alcor
z
mo 0
= r
E-10
z
0)
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project- 26
Figure 18. FEMA Flood Map
a_ W
IL
ZONE C
k
7
LIMITOF
t)E. TAd LEn STUDY -fT '47
(� G
ZONE V4
ZONE4
(EL 1(1
t^� Z ,� E V!_3 ZONE Al 24 aac
'J S 1. b? •�, ii llr2 I {EL 71 J"
�. CHEVY CHASE TO
RM3 CAPEGEORGEHGIAI]
`:. ZONE: �1
ZONE A3 —
` ZONE VT
IFLe �,
Beckett Pt LI� Of
4ErAIl ED t1l)DY
ZONE A
MS&A
APPROXIMATE SCALE
16D0 D 1000 FEET +I
�1
I NATIONAL FUON M$11ANCE PRBCRAI
FIRM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
°JEFFERSON COUNTY,
�;
WASHINGTON
(UNINCORPORATED AREAS)
PARER 135 Of 1625
r/. r.,._Hm++an+wr_eu Mer+.twrxat
LCOMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER
i' 530069 0135 0
I" EFFECTIVE DATE:
I
IN JULY 10, 1982
4
Federal EmOM-Y Ml qpm tAmy
-7n+ r +n a,�ur �laae a, Fontan auw .rr,.. �.t•r+ww Foca w t
W� nkwFwf Wuy F#1R p— bo..
o i+e. met_ C a t nal t1.1 tnpyn
WMk F e fttIMm ♦h Wm' aW�Kirr!!u F t /pn -
epe CtM d w IM I.teli k tft rl IlN F*r I,T s . ■F9pep {�e_ntce
�PIGy}em lepd mrne ene[Y Stte F�i•,ea i{tgp Nap Stgr+. ee vww, mle frn+{pt
Cline Residential Development Project- 27
Figure 19. Washinaton Denartment of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Forage Fish Snawnina Areas
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project• 28
CoaSUI Atlas
"Imflrj�ect Site
0 f7
' !Wft
EM
*fthr » Coastal Atlas mA.
I I I Projk'iCt LSILC
99a
I"wv GL.T.
EWPIRM
kDir-Kj 6Sr'i
Figure 23. WDOE Coastal Atlas Coastal Landforms
Add eft
MS&A
Cline Residential Development Project• 30
Figure 22. Jefferson County Critical Areas Shore Form Type
%146
-i Mh.C1 N.n zoc65iq..,,
Sli
—
.• JC IIrY
Iwc.NM
1b.Isu�T
r,am•n " _ .. .�u��"n V]lV
! $%IfIfeNlle Fl�N n
W71ftf And 911171N"
Orw*b
iuSea.'o• -
''M _. BilOd\iGnd Tj3it
516 9�WfaG11\
USWTDM
11�
r Mt1 A"I
[_I „ RilYSNtlal PhelMi
I) 20 3A*UPhOtM
'
C1 2041 MdWPhDOO
2MANUtPNADS
I 1 klGlPty'b
,. v... aE
1-.DhLd3a MM &h&d4
SNamde Mlenrd 15 saw GI Vl�ge1 tilrlr
Cl L"s F91h*0
�I 6Fl NOW?Lu r
C✓: . S6undules
ii9WA PORA
GO RNC GD Sm10-1. ,1546 G6 --MO Set—�1
..._ .... -
f Aake4� Nap
Figure 23. WDOE Coastal Atlas Coastal Landforms
Add eft
MS&A
Cline Residential Development Project• 30
I
Figure 24. Jefferson County Critical Areas Seismic Hazard Map
LA
G. Ream Go map set
ure 25. Jefferson County Critical Areas Shoreline Slope Stab!
Go
FEMA nRUS OM
U302)
Era0wHaw
em" A*AW
R"uoAmas
-SIP240"aw
-j Kieya[an
PFC41cw
Zones
gnu sus Sfa4•
sub"
f,r 0-4-
ZMW�Lux,m
~ (MII-TP
WY . Y J LW -c:
R'. hmh Map
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project- 31
Zn t....,
All—
PEUAFFUSTIoDd
N tn)
ErwmHaLaw
co" Aadv
RI'Macgonfal
WZ-SaI,xwsf
ftusian Rotmsm
hnis
stwdoft Slop#
ChsnrM WWWw
20" HWX
—W
s2lapgog &MIA
TM519arIA Zama
cowey?m"
U mwlj. end BLO."Aft
ReftRsh Mm
47 Go — M�P
We[I
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project- 31
Figures 26. WDFW Priority Habitats and Species (PHS) Report
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE
PRIORITY HABITATS AND SPECIES REPORT
SOURCE DATASET PHSPh15PuDIic Ouery ID. P141220230345
REPORT DATE 12/2012014 1105
ccftrn nh[ --e 1.0 NaMe Pri&Ay V"
Nir- $urea Oatowl Dcrvrrv" hoFed"Sialva 5prMe.vy ["16:a sd.1l� P.rlrNy
OWDA
SCdta Rrsud V5 bIY oon, .rm junL! ` SWA +7r»I. elm 060MA Tne
No[" SOLM Daft Ugnd ROpommardapfn/
ESTUARMIE INTERTIDAL NIA Agm4n: Hobaal NA WA k US Fan ale1MIdWe S—m
NIMPOLY Agwli.h heal WA AS MAPPED Pdyw-
htw iMw1v ecy nra PHS Lrsled
Paafic Hwrirg Dicwwygey! BPeediq Ares NA NIA N -
Ca1Fea pgllesi HertSprrn Breediq area Car le sdaAS MAPPED PpdyWmJ Fiet1 Preprem
hepfA.otw•wa PHS Llsled
DISCLAIMER TNs rapca indudas rlfumaeon q1W IM nulnrm L>.cvraanara d p,eh xq'a5I�L4 {Y.OF;MI marlairsn s uroal camp+rer Calagay N iu nfl an allampl ro pv.Wa you wMr an ef5u9 ag�nry resporsa
.la Plq wnpame Or yeul p ow 011 Ilan ano *Aare thN orYiftP9M gray wr'AwIrk Prq IOCOIlen d ft&h And wfdlrq rR( Wr to uw ball of our krVnWSpq h h 1101 a compWq Irrger*" wW i[ 6 unpongM la n01q MW hin
d"4 NI67111e inaucei mal accrr in areas Hol elr/er111y km,,n ro YAfW Eldapi�ef. or n dtl+l5 in ei'.c11 cvnprehmarry nr+rys Here amt ec+�n Wnq,nM Sile joe .ne surm" ore rleque Mr 11e:,"S"ry ho rula olt N+e
pcecr+sr d 0+orrr mevm Lacacclr'a ar Aah r1d v,iahk isiQurxe•.arc xAiexi to +raria, re,nsl !y dilhsWrcr dvracs n xavn,fra! wealhcY onrr lltp9.. YVDFW don n d mromrrend inirq repona more than
ere molelll dd
12/207014 11 05 1
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project- 32
Figure 27. WDFW Test Map
December 20, 2014 1:19,842
0 015 03 Dom
PWS Report Clip Area AS MAPPED Fl TQWNSHlP
• PT SECTION
0 osrs oss 1 km
- wnrw
LN QTR•TWP
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project- 33
MS&A Cline Residential Development Project• 34
,,P-1:'li'1t
r� L'
1 -
r
y ill
I
_ ' r •.
• i. '
f � \'. M.�� n �^
dL