Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
ZON2017-00010 Aquifer Recharge Report
April 5, 2017 Jefferson County Department of Public Works 623 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, Washington 98368 Attention: Gordon Ramstrom GEOENGINEERS 8410 154th Avenue NE Redmond, Washington 98052 425.861.6000 r .JEFFERSON COUNTY DG0 Subject: Aquifer Recharge Area Report Quilcene Solid Waste Drop Box Facility Improvements Quilcene, Washington File No. 01422-021-00 INTRODUCTION GeoEngineers, Inc. (GeoEngineers) is pleased to submit this Aquifer Recharge Area Report for the Quilcene Solid Waste Drop Box Facility Improvements project. The project site is located at 295316 Highway 101 near Quilcene, Washington. The site location is shown in the attached Vicinity Map (Figure 1). Our understanding of the project is based on discussions with and information provided by Jefferson County Department of Public Works (Public Works) and our experience preparing hydrogeologic assessments. We understand that Public Works has proposed to upgrade their existing Quilcene Solid Waste Drop Box Facility by replacing an existing 80 -square -foot (sf) attendant office with a new 240-sf attendant office structure and upgrading an existing shipping container to an approximately 560-sf environmental center, which would be used for the collection of household waste such as fluorescent lighting, oils and anti -freeze. Minor clearing, grading, or other ground -disturbing activities are proposed and no processing of hazardous materials is expected. The project site is located outside of critical areas, except for the critical aquifer recharge area (CARA). The proposal involves hazardous materials; therefore, an aquifer recharge area report that complies with Jefferson County Code (JCC) 18.22.120(1) Articles III (Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas) and VIII (Special Reports) was required. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of our hydrogeologic services is to develop an aquifer recharge area report for the proposed project that will meet the requirements of JCC 18.22.400. Jefferson County Public Works April 5, 2017 Task 100 — Aquifer Recharge Area Report wage Jefferson County (County) requires that an aquifer recharge area report be completed for this project because it is located within an area of moderate aquifer sensitivity. The County requires submitting a written assessment that details the hydrogeologic characteristics and subsurface conditions and indicates the susceptibility and potential for contamination of groundwater supplies. The report was prepared to meet the requirements of an aquifer recharge area report per JCC 18.22.400. Our scope of services for this task included the following: 1. Reviewing documents provided by Public Works that describe the proposed site plan, operations and uses of the site. 2. Reviewing available published and site-specific reports and other information regarding the geologic setting, hydrogeology and background water quality of the site and vicinity. 3. Reviewing available well and borehole data within 1,000 feet of the site. 4. Estimating groundwater elevations, recharge potential, flow direction and gradient from nearby well and borehole data. We understand that there are no existing groundwater monitoring wells on the site. 5. Completing a brief site visit to observe geologic conditions, nearby surface water features, wells and springs. 6. Preparing an aquifer recharge area report by a qualified licensed hydrogeologist. We will submit a draft report to Public Works for internal review and comment. After your comments are discussed and incorporated, we will produce the final report for submittal to the County. The report will be based on the County's requirements that shall include, from JCC 18.22.400(2): A. A detailed description of the project, including all processes and other activities that have the potential for contaminating groundwater; B. A hydrogeologic evaluation that includes, ata minimum: a. A description of the hydrogeologic setting of the aquifer region; b. Site location, topography, drainage, and surface water bodies; c. Soils and geologic units underlying the site; d. Groundwater characteristics of the area, including flow direction and gradient, and existing groundwater quality; e. The location and characteristics of wells and springs within 1,000 feet of the site; f. An evaluation of existing groundwater recharge; and g. A discussion and evaluation of the potential impact of the proposal upon groundwater recharge; C. A contaminant transport analysis for the uppermost groundwater supply aquifer assuming an accidental spill or release of project -specific contaminants or on-site sewage discharge, or both if applicable; D. A discussion and evaluation that details available on-site spill response and containment equipment, employee spill response training, and emergency service coordination measures; E. Proposed best management practices (BMPs) to minimize exposure of permeable surfaces to potential pollutants and to prevent degradation of groundwater quality; and GEOENGINEM I ;' Jefferson County Public Works April 5, 2017 PI,de 3 F. Requirements for a monitoring program with financial guarantees/assurances that the monitoring program will be implemented. REFERENCE MATERIALS The following references and databases were accessed to obtain information pertaining to site characteristics: 1. Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) Well Log Viewer database. This database provides water well reports (well logs) for wells drilled in Washington state, available at https.//fortress.wa.gov/ecy/waterresou rces/map/WCLSWebMa p/defa u lt.aspx 2. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) SalmonScape online mapping tool provides fish use and habitat information for Washington state, available at http://apps.wdfw.wa.gov/salmonscape/map.html 3. Washington Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) Forest Practices Application Mapping Tool (FPMAT). This site provides GIS -based information on the hydrology and fish use in the state, available at https://fortress.wa.gov/dnr/protectiongis/fpamt/default.aspx 4. U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) Mount Walker, 1:24,000 scale topographic map. 5. WDNR Interactive Geologic Maps. Online data base of surface geology for Washington state, available at https://fortress.wa.gov/dnr/protectiongis/geology/?Theme=wigm 6. Washington State Department of Health (DOH) Division of Environmental Health Office of Drinking Water, Sentry internet database. This database contains information on the location, water sources and water quality information for state public water systems, available at https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/eh/portal/odw/si/Intro.aspx 7. DOH Source Water Assessment Program (SWAP) Maps. This database provides maps of wellhead protection areas for Groups A and B water systems, available at https:Hfortress.wa.gov/doh/eh/dw/swap/maps/ 8. United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2017. Web Soil Survey. Surface soil maps for Jefferson County, available at https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm A site visit was conducted on March 17, 2017, by Joel Purdy, a licensed Hydrogeologist with GeoEngineers. Joel was given a tour of the current Quilcene Drop Box Facility by Cordon Ramstrom, the Architectural Project Planner with Public Works. The tour included viewing the current operation of the facilities, the proposed location of the drop box and the general site layout. Field -locating of water -supply wells and surface water bodies in the project site vicinity was conducted by viewing various parcels along Highway 101 while driving. The GPS locations of wells, as the located by assumed pump houses, were recorded and included in maps discussed below. GEOENGINEERS I ) Jefferson County Public Works April 5, 2017 PROPOSED PROJECT Jefferson County Public Works permanently closed four Rural Drop Box Facilities (RDBF) leaving only one operating RDBF located at the subject site at Quilcene. The RDBF is a vital part of the Jefferson County Solid Waste Management system. The RDBF receives materials and transfer them to other destinations for processing and/or disposal. Municipal Solid Waste and appliances will be transported to a disposal facility outside the boundaries of Jefferson County. The RDBF also has a recycle area with collection boxes for different types of recyclable materials which, once sorted, are transported to the Recycle Center located at the Jefferson County Transfer Station Facility by a company operating under contract. The RDBF has collection containers for used oil and antifreeze that are transported to the Jefferson County Moderate Risk Waste Facility for processing. The RDBF produces two different wastewater streams. The sanitary wastewater is handled by portable vault toilets services by a contractor. All storm water that drains from impermeable surfaces, such as paved areas and building roofs, are discharged to a grass filtration area located along the edge of the site. Storm water collected in the filtration area is discharged and infiltrated into naturally vegetated areas. These systems are not on a scheduled maintenance program, but they are periodically inspected and, if problems occur, are corrected immediately. Per the Operations and Maintenance Plan', there are three categories of materials that are expected to arrive at the RDBF: "Acceptable Materials", "Unacceptable Materials", and "Special Materials": "Acceptable Materials" include residential and municipal solid waste and recyclables, including but not limited to garbage, rubbish, refuse, waste paper, tires, cardboard, plastics, metals, and bulky household items. "Unacceptable Materials" are generally liquids, hazardous materials (except oil, antifreeze, compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs), and lead acid batteries that are accepted at the Household Hazardous Waste station) or radioactive materials, explosives, pathological or biological medical materials (except sharps wastes as defined in WAC 173.300.020), bulk loads of tires, or any materials that would likely pose a threat to health or safety. "Special Materials" are any material (even though it may be part of a delivered load of material), that is otherwise considered acceptable material, but because of its unique characteristics, requires special handling and may be subject to a special fee. All special materials not listed above are diverted to other disposal facilities. A state operations permit # SWF 14-0007 is maintained as required and displayed onsite. Accurate records of volumes and/or weights and revenues are required by state regulation. A report is required on an annual basis that describes RDBF activities during the previous year, including the quantity in weight (tons), volume (cubic yards), and estimated density (pounds per cubic yard) by type of material. 1 Jefferson County Department of Public Works, Solid Waste Division, 2012, Volume 3 Jefferson County Rural Dropbox Facility Operation & Maintenance Plan. GEOENGINEER5r" Jefferson County Public Works April 5, 2017 -e5 The RDBF is not equipped with weigh scales so all incoming material is tracked and recorded by volume (Jefferson County Department of Public Works, Solid Waste Division, 2012). Public Works provided the following list of the waste materials that will be handled at the Quilcene RDBF. The listed quantities are maximum amounts that are allowed onsite at one time. Motor oil: 250 gallons Anti -freeze: 150 gallons Fluorescent tubes and compact fluorescent lamps: 100 Lead acid batteries: 15 SITE LOCATION, TOPOGRAPHY, DRAINAGE AND SURFACE WATER BODIES The site consists of a part of tax parcel 70223-1010, located at 295316 Highway 101 in Quilcene, Washington. The RDBF site is at approximately 104 feet elevation and is relatively flat. Approximately 1,000 feet north of the site is an unnamed water body identified by the WDFW as a Swamp -Marsh and locally referred to as Nelson's Pond. An unnamed stream is mapped by others (SalmonScape and FPMAT) to be approximately 200 to 300 feet west of the site. According to the maps and existing topography, the stream appears to be shown to flow north toward Nelson's Pond and south toward Big Quilcene River, located approximately 1,200 feet south of the site. However, no stream channel or culvert under Highway 101 was observed during the site visit. SOILS AND GEOLOGIC UNITS UNDERLYING THE SITE GEOLOGY Geologic information for the project vicinity was obtained from the Digital Geology of Washington State 1:100,000 scale map (WDNR November 2016). The Surficial Geology Map (Figure 2) shows three different geologic units of Quaternary Age in the vicinity: Alluvium (Qa), Glacial Recessional Outwash (Qgo), and Undivided Pre -Fraser Deposits (Qgpc) as shown on Figure 2. The nearby bedrock likely occurs at depth below the site and below the surficial soil. The surface geology of the RDBF is Glacial Recessional Outwash (Qa). This unit consists of pebble to cobble gravel and sand that is gray to tan and is generally unoxidized with little iron staining. Recessional outwash was typically deposited over glacial till or advance outwash by meltwater streams emanating from the retreating Vashon glacier. Recessional outwash deposits typically consist of sand, gravel, cobbles and boulders. They were typically deposited within deeper valleys remaining after recession of the Vashon glacier. Recessional outwash is generally 5 to 100 feet thick. Undivided Pre -Fraser Deposits (Qgpc,) can be from glacial and nonglacial deposits. This unit is believed to be Pre -Fraser in age but may include younger deposits such as Quaternary advance outwash because of uncertain identity of similar lithologies. Alluvium (Qa) consists of sand, gravel, silt, and clay that is typically tan to gray but can be dark grayish brown. It is variably sorted, loose to consolidated, and stratified. Alluvium is deposited in stream beds and estuaries. The alluvium in the site vicinity was deposited by the Big Quilcene River to the south of the site, and is mapped in the flood plain of the river. GEOENGINEERS Jefferson County Public Works April 5, 2017 'Sv The USDA Soil Survey has mapped the RDBF site as 'Hoodsport very gravelly sandy loam' (USDA 2017). The site is mapped as having a slope of between 0 to 15 percent and the soil is classified as 'moderately well drained'. The USDA Soil Survey estimates the infiltration rate as low to moderately low at 0 to 0.06 inches per hour and with no frequency of flooding or ponding. HYDROGEOLOGIC SETTING Wells and Springs Wells in the vicinity of RDBF site are shown on the Well Location Map (Figure 3). The logs from wells in the area indicate that the shallow subsurface geology is generally consistent with the surficial geology map. Soils recorded in the well logs consist of sand, gravel, cobbles and clay. Some well logs indicate 'hardpan' several feet below ground surface. Hardpan is a term for very dense glacial till that has relatively low permeability. The source aquifer for nearby wells is likely confined based on well log information. Springs were not identified in the RDBF site vicinity on maps reviewed for this study. No water systems or households in the vicinity are known to have springs as sources for water supplies. Well Logs Water well reports (well logs) were obtained from Ecology's online database. Logs for resource protection wells were not found in the Ecology database search. Although drillers are required to submit water well reports for water -supply wells, not all wells have well logs records, including those drilled prior to the reporting regulations. It should also be noted that location information provided on the well logs are notoriously inaccurate, or even missing. For this study, we assumed that nearby residences are served by individual wells. Figure 3 shows the approximate locations of the wells in the area that fall into four categories: 1. Wells that were visually observed in the field and correlated with well logs; 2. Wells with associated well logs that were not field -located and shown with approximate locations; 3. Wells visually observed in the field without correlated well logs: and 4. Assumed wells associated with residences, without well logs, and not visually observed in the field (shown as "unknown well" on Figure 3). Table 1 summarizes information from well logs associated with nearby parcels (categories 1 and 2 above). Ten wells were identified within 1,000 feet of the proposed site based on Ecology's database and the site visit. Six additional wells were known or assumed within the vicinity. Well logs for wells found in the Ecology's database are included in Appendix A. GEOENGINEER5171 ;efferson G_=,ity Public Y/or'-;s Agri! 5. 20.1-7 TABLE 1. SUMMARY OF WELL LOG INFORMATION ?age '7 The well logs for the wells located nearest to the proposed site (the Jefferson, Colyott, Pederson and Colhesse wells shown on Figure 3) indicate that water is encountered between 50 and 70 feet below ground surface. The source aquifer for these wells appears to be confined by relatively low -permeability layers of clay or "hardpan" as indicated by water levels that are shallower than the depths of the aquifer materials. The Jefferson County PUD Well located approximately 800 feet northeast of the proposed site is drilled relatively deeper (165 feet below ground surface) than other wells in the vicinity and may be completed in a deeper portion of the confined aquifer than the typical residential wells in the vicinity. Gro, Andvvate� Chaml�,tadsdc: Groundwater flow directions were estimated based on water levels in wells near the proposed site and general topography. Water levels reported on the Ecology well logs are prone to being imprecise. Furthermore, the ground surface elevations at the wellheads were not surveyed. However, based on the given information groundwater flow is likely to the south or southeast toward the Big Quilcene River. Our evaluation of groundwater quality is based on the review of DOH online database records for nearby water systems. The database indicates that there have been no exceedances of the inorganic components tested in the water systems listed. In general, water quality appears good, with relatively low hardness, conductivity, manganese and iron. �r,a�ursd^rva�e� R2charge Groundwater recharge in the area comes from infiltration of precipitation falling within the aquifer source area. Precipitation that falls either runs off to surface water bodies, evaporates, is transpired by plants, or GEOENGINEERS ;, Land Well Screen/Well Groundwater Surface Opening Depth2 Elevation3 Well Name Original Well Owner Elevation' (feet) (feet) Quilcene Little League Jefferson County (ACC086) Department of Public Works 125 88 to 121.5 93 Jefferson County PUD #1 USDA Olympic National 80 65 to 166.5 41 (ABR399) Forest - Quilcene Road Quilcene Bible Church Quilcene Bible Church 134 98 to 103 57 Philip Jefferson Philip Jefferson 110 67 60 Ray Colhesse Ray Colhesse 110 53 80 Tranquilcene Trailer Park Russell "Art" Smith 125 Unknown4 60 (AGR 744) W.R. Colyott W.R. Colyott 95 77 55 Walter Pederson Wally Peterson 113 56 65 Notes: 1 Land surface elevations were based on approximate locations and using USGS topographic maps or Google Earth elevations. 2 Depths below ground surface of well screens, perforations or open casing bottoms as reported on well logs. 3 Groundwater elevations were derived from subtracting the depth to water as reported on the well logs from the land surface elevations. ^. The well log copy is mostly illegible. The well logs for the wells located nearest to the proposed site (the Jefferson, Colyott, Pederson and Colhesse wells shown on Figure 3) indicate that water is encountered between 50 and 70 feet below ground surface. The source aquifer for these wells appears to be confined by relatively low -permeability layers of clay or "hardpan" as indicated by water levels that are shallower than the depths of the aquifer materials. The Jefferson County PUD Well located approximately 800 feet northeast of the proposed site is drilled relatively deeper (165 feet below ground surface) than other wells in the vicinity and may be completed in a deeper portion of the confined aquifer than the typical residential wells in the vicinity. Gro, Andvvate� Chaml�,tadsdc: Groundwater flow directions were estimated based on water levels in wells near the proposed site and general topography. Water levels reported on the Ecology well logs are prone to being imprecise. Furthermore, the ground surface elevations at the wellheads were not surveyed. However, based on the given information groundwater flow is likely to the south or southeast toward the Big Quilcene River. Our evaluation of groundwater quality is based on the review of DOH online database records for nearby water systems. The database indicates that there have been no exceedances of the inorganic components tested in the water systems listed. In general, water quality appears good, with relatively low hardness, conductivity, manganese and iron. �r,a�ursd^rva�e� R2charge Groundwater recharge in the area comes from infiltration of precipitation falling within the aquifer source area. Precipitation that falls either runs off to surface water bodies, evaporates, is transpired by plants, or GEOENGINEERS ;, Jefferson County Public Works April 5, 2017 1 gc infiltrates below the root zone to provide groundwater recharge. Permeable surfaces such as sands and gravels tend to infiltrate water better than relatively impermeable surfaces such as asphalt, silt or clay. POTENTIAL IMPACTS UPON GROUNDWATER RECHARGE The proposed Quilcene RDBF project is to upgrade the facility by replacing an existing 80-sf attendant office with a new 240-sf attendant office and upgrading an existing shipping container to an approximately 560-sf environmental center, which would be used for the collection of household waste such as fluorescent lighting, oils and anti -freeze. This planned upgrade results in an additional 720 sf of impermeable area. The increase in impermeable area would increase the runoff and decrease infiltration within the 720-sf area. However, the site will be designed to route storm water from impervious surfaces to existing grass infiltration areas. Thus, there will be minimal impacts if any to current groundwater recharge rates and volumes. CONTAMINANT TRANSPORT The surficial geology at the site is recessional outwash, which is generally highly permeable. Most of the site appears to be underlain by surficial sand and gravel. If a spill occurred on soil at the site, the spill may infiltrate within the unsaturated soils. Because the soils are unsaturated, transport of the spill would likely be generally vertical. The nearest groundwater is in a confined aquifer encountered at about 50 to 70 feet below ground surface and appears to be protected by low -permeability layers based on logs of nearby wells. Thus, a quick response is expected to contain the spill before reaching the groundwater table. The proposed site is located within the 10 -year travel -time of the fixed -radius wellhead protection area for the Quilcene School District based on the online DOH SWAP mapping application. The School District's well is located approximately 3,500 feet east of the proposed site and is approximately 62 feet deep according to DOH water facilities inventory records (DOH Sentry Internet database). Because the well is located 3.500 feet away and is cross -gradient from the proposed site, potential spills or contamination at the site pose a minimal risk to the well. SPILL RESPONSE Public Works' spill response is outlined in the Jefferson County Limited Moderate -Risk Waste Collection Facilities: Operations, Spill Management & Prevention Plans, Volume 6. Section 8 addresses spill procedures for antifreeze, motor oils, battery acid, and broken mercury -containing lights. Section 8 directs other spill procedures for other hazardous material to be handled by the Solid Waste Coordinator. The spill kit at the Quilcene site is in the on-site tool shed (Jefferson County Department of Public Works, Solid Waste Division 2016). The outlined spill responses include stopping the source of the spill and placing the container over secondary containment, if applicable. Additionally, the outlined spill responses include using loose absorbent to stop the spread of a spill, collecting any free liquid, and cleaning hard surfaces with soap or detergent. Public Works report that it has equipment located on site that could be used to promptly excavate soils within the spill area if necessary. The spill responses are designed in part to minimize the effect of the spill and reduce the likelihood of the spilled material seeping into the aquifer. GEOENGINEERS /,-;7 Jefferson County Public Works April 5, 2017 "ale g Good housekeeping and preventive maintenance are on-going approaches to improve and maintain a clean environment. We suggest that curbing be considered in the area around the drop -box to prevent spilled materials from reaching the infiltration areas. In addition, the following is a list of suggested BMPs for the proposed Quilcene RDBF upgrades: 1. Vacuum paved surfaces with a vacuum sweeper to remove accumulated pollutants a minimum of once per quarter. 2. Inspect all vehicles and mobile and stationary equipment during site inspections for leaking fluids such as oil, antifreeze, etc. Take leaking equipment and vehicles out of service or prevent leaks from spilling on the ground until repaired. 3. Immediately clean up spills and leaks to prevent the discharge of pollutants. Immediately notify Ecology and the local sewer authority if a spill may reach sanitary or storm sewers, ground water, or surface water, in accordance with federal and Ecology spill reporting requirements. 4. Promptly contain and clean up solid and liquid pollutant leaks and spills including oils and fuels on any exposed soil, vegetation or paved areas. Use solid absorbents (e.g. clay, peat, rags) where practicable. 5. Significant amount of debris can accumulate at uncovered loading/unloading areas. Sweep these surfaces at least quarterly to remove material that could otherwise be washed off by stormwater. Sweep outside areas that are covered for a period of time by containers or other material after the areas are cleared. Do not hose down the areas. 6. Promptly repair any deterioration threatening the structural integrity of the facilities. 7. Place drip containers at locations where leaks or spills may occur such as hose connections, hose reels, filler nozzles, beneath mounted container taps, and under parts or vehicles that drip. Drip containers shall always be used when making and breaking connections. Check loading/unloading equipment such as valves, pumps, flanges, and connections regularly for leaks and repair as needed. Empty drip containers immediately after a spill or leak is collected. 8. Inspect all incoming vehicles, parts, and equipment stored temporarily outside for leaks. 9. Promptly repair or replace all leaking connections, pipes, hoses, valves, etc., which can contaminate stormwater. 10. Conduct all oily parts cleaning, steam cleaning, or pressure washing of equipment or containers inside a building, or on an impervious contained area, such as a concrete pad. Direct contaminated stormwater from such an area to approved treatment. 11. For the storage of liquids use containers that are rigid and durable, non-absorbent, water -tight, and corrosion resistant both to weather and the material stored. Replace or repair containers that are leaking, corroded, or otherwise deteriorating. Use aboveground storage tanks (ASTs), piping, containers, valves etc. that are appropriate for their intended use and for the contained liquid. Place tight -fitting lids on all containers. 12. Where feasible, store potential stormwater pollutant materials inside a building or under a cover and/or containment. 13. Minimize use of toxic cleaning solvents, such as chlorinated solvents and othertoxic chemicals. Recycle waste materials to the maximum extent feasible. GEOENGINEER5 Jefferson County Public Works April 5, 2017 Page 1C 14. If leachates and/or emissions from buildings are suspected sources of stormwater pollutants, then sample and analyze the stormwater draining from the building. 15. Sweep roofs routinely to remove zinc residuals. CONCLUSIONS GeoEngineers completed a hydrogeologic evaluation and aquifer recharge area report for the Quilcene Rural Drop Box Facility proposed by Jefferson County Public Works in compliance with Jefferson County Code 18.22.120(1) Articles III (Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas) and VIII (Special Reports). We provide the following conclusions based on our study: Proposed project: The proposed Quilcene Solid Waste Drop Box Facility Improvements project. We understand that Public Works has proposed to upgrade their existing facility by replacing an existing 80-sf attendant office with a new 240-sf attendant office structure and upgrading an existing shipping container to an approximately 560-sf upgrade of the existing environmental center, which would be used for the collection of household waste such as fluorescent lighting, oils and anti -freeze. No new clearing, grading, or other ground -disturbing activities are proposed and no processing of hazardous materials is expected. Hydrogeologic setting of the aquifer: The RDBF site is located in an upland area approximately 1,200 feet from the Big Quilcene River, and underlain by shallow confined aquifers used by local residences and water systems. Site location, topography, drainage, and surface water bodies: The RDBF site is located at 295316 Highway 101 near Quilcene, Washington. Topography slopes generally to the south and southeast toward the Big Quilcene River. Drainage of the site is generally to the south and southeast. There is a large wetland located on the northern edge of the Jefferson County parcel that is locally referred to as Nelson's Pond. A stream that was mapped by WDNR to the west of the site was not found during the site visit. Soils and geologic units underlying the site: The surface is mapped as being underlain by glacial outwash deposits and Hoodsport soils. These are relatively permeable and "moderately well drained" soils. Groundwater characteristics of the area, including flow direction and gradient, and existing groundwater quality: Groundwater is generally encountered between 50 and 70 feet below ground. The source aquifer is generally confined based on information on well logs. Groundwater is interpreted to flow to the south and southwest based on water level data and general topography. The location and characteristics of wells and springs within 1,000 feet of the site: Ten wells were either field located or assumed to be associated with residences located within 1,000 feet of the site. Wells range in depths from 55 and 165 feet. No springs were observed within 1,000 feet of the site during the site visit or noted on maps found at online database sources. An evaluation of existing groundwater recharge: Groundwater recharge is from precipitation that falls upon the site. The proposed project will add approximately 720 sf of impervious surfaces. Stormwater from the new impervious surfaces will be routed to existing grass infiltration areas surroundingthe site. GEOENGINEERS ,' J Jefferson County Public works April 5, 2017 Page • Potential impact of the proposal upon groundwater recharge: The proposed project will have minimal, if any, impacts upon groundwater recharge at the site. • Transport analysis for the uppermost groundwater supply aquifer assuming an accidental spill or release of project -specific contaminants or on-site sewage discharge, or both: Site soils are unsaturated and relatively permeable. If a spill was to occur, the spill would migrate generally vertically. The source aquifer for wells in the area is encountered between 50 and 70 feet below ground, and is considered confined based on well log information. The confining unit is formed byfine-grained material that will naturally protect the aquifer from potential contamination from a hypothetical spill. Thus, there likely will be time for remedial action and spill response before the contamination reaches the aquifer. • On-site spill response and containment equipment, employee spill response training, and emergency service coordination measures: Jefferson County Public Works has a spill response plan, an onsite spill kit, employee response training and emergency service coordination based on a review of their Operations & Maintenance Plan documentation. ■ Proposed best management practices to minimize exposure of permeable surfaces to potential pollutants and to prevent degradation of groundwater quality: A list of suggested BMPs are provided within this report. We also recommend curbing of the area surrounding the proposed environmental center to contain potential spills. ■ Requirements for a monitoring program with financial guarantees/assurances that the monitoring program will be implemented: We are not recommending that a monitoring program be implemented because of the low risk to the aquifer and relatively small volumes of hazardous materials handled at the drop box. ACCURACY, ASSUMPTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The critical areas analysis presented herein relied upon geologic information collected from well logs obtained from the Ecology database that contains imprecise information reported by others. No onsite subsurface investigations were conducted on the proposed project site. Groundwater information in the site vicinity is limited. Water level information for the wells within the proposed project vicinity were obtained from water well reports. Water levels taken at the time of drilling can be inaccurate. Ground surface elevations at the wells were not surveyed and were estimated based on publicly available websites. REFERENCES Jefferson County Department of Public Works, Solid Waste Division. 2012. Jefferson County Rural Dropbox Facility Operation & Maintenance Plan. Volume 3. Jefferson County Department of Public Works, Solid Waste Division. 2016. Limited Moderate -Risk Waste Collection Facilities: Operations, Spill Management & Prevention Plans. Volume 6. United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2017. Web Soil Survey. Available at https://websoiIsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm GEOENGINEERS_ Jefferson County Public Works April 5, 2017 Page 12 Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources, 2016, Surface geology, 1:100,000—GIS data, November 2016: Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Digital Data Series DS -18, version 3.1, previously released June 2010. Washington State Department of Ecology. 2017. Washington State Well Log Viewer. Available at https:Hfortress.wa.gov/ecy/waterresources/map/WCLSWebMap/ Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2017. SalmonScape. Available at http://apps.wdfw.wa.gov/salmonscape/ Washington State Department of Health. 2017. Sentry Internet Database. Available at https:Hfortress.wa.gov/doh/eh/portal/odw/si/intro.aspx Washington State Department of Health, Source Water Assessment Program (SWAP) Maps. Available at https://fortress.wa.gov/doh/eh/dw/swap/maps/ GEOENGINEEU—.-I,) Jefferson County Public Works April 5, 2017 Page 13 LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for use by Jefferson County Public Works to assist them in evaluating critical areas for the Quilcene Rural Drop Box Facility Project near Quilcene, Washington. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in the field of hydrogeology in this area at the time this report was prepared. The conclusions, recommendations, and opinions presented in this report are based on our professional knowledge, judgment and experience. No warranty or other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. We appreciate the opportunity to provide services to you for this project. Please contact us if you have any questions or wish to discuss this letter. Sincerely, GeoEngineers, Inc. f� anna C.6eRu r Hydrogeologist TCD:1WP:cam Attachments: Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. Surface Geology Figure 3. Site Plan Appendix A. Well Logs One copy submitted electronically 7 o it Se y J0EEL W. PUR Y ` �oel W. Purdy, LG, ZLHG,:CW Associate Hydrogeologist Disclaimer: Any electronic form, facsimile or hard copy of the original document (email, text, table, and/or figure), if provided, and any attachments are only a copy of the original document. The original document is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official document of record. GEOENGINEERS File No. 1422-021-00 4 kOOnRd m A otymQ,t Nwy GB Glenlegie Rd Angeles P41 Townsend 5horethne Seattle of Notes: 1. The locations of all features shown are approximate. 21 This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showingfeatures discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannotguarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The masterfile is stored by GeoEn®neers, Inc. and will serve as the official record ofthis communication, N Q Data Source: Mapbox Open Street Map, 2016 aProjection: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet Wildwoo n Qo rJ u n oP iC 2a e� Cel Cemetery Rd Elkhound Past Fy;T. �a & Frani 6etkRo E4oi/cane Rd 0S H Smith St 2 Bowen St Herbert St W Rose St Quilcene Olympic Hwy Linger Longer Rd Olympic Mr*^l SITE Fremont Ave a Muncie Ave Leadville Ave 5 931 �a 69 owl— a,r www IId.1—k ry m Jy� a 4 N W E ,17S 2,000 0 2,000 Feet Vicinity Map Quilcene SW Aquifer Recharge Area Report Quilcene, WA GWENGINEERS I Figure Qgo Le end Geologic Unit 3 ° ® SW Site Alluvium (Qa) u Glacial Outwash (Qgo) Undivided Pre -Fraser Deposits (Qgpc) N otes: 1. The locations of all features shown are approximate. v 2. This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannot guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files, The master file is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official record of this communication. Data Source: WA DNR, Puget Sound UDAR Consortium y Projection: NAD 1953 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet Qgpc 500 QUILCENE DROP -BOX SITE La _ Z_ N 0 500 W-_ E Fe et S Surface Geology Map Quilcene SW Aquifer Recharge Area Report Quilcene, ,WAA GEOENGINEE RS,t/�,�► Figure Ll r �QUILCENE DROP -BOX SITE .moi, Legend ® Quilcene Drop -Box Site t) Field -Located Well with Well Log 1,000 ft Buffer • Approximate Well Location with Well Log 500 Parcel Boundary © Approximate Well Location without Well Log Approximate —�• Shallow Groundwater Field -Located Well without Well Log Flow Directions Notes: 1. The locations of all features shown are approximate. 2. This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showingfeatures discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannotguarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official record of this communication, Data Source: ESRI, Jefferson County GIS, WA Dept. of Ecology Projection: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet } • 500 a71 Feet S Well Location Map Quilcene SW Aquifer Recharge Area Report Quilcene, WA GEOENGINEERs Figure APPENDIX A Well Logs Start Card No. (— Flle•brtglnalandFbAtCopywfth WATER WELL REPORT UNICWEWELLI.D.! Department of ECafogy Second Copy — Owner's Copy STATE OF WASHINGTON water Right Permll No. Third Copy —Dr11Wr'sCOPY p _ L Ad teei /'L/r e�C�x2o7U �Wi- %a+i�4lCv�AD /A �t•� L (1) OWNER: r ,� f45aC T. 27 N.. R 2 W W.M. CL (2) LOCATION OF WELL: county "�� f sy W j (2a) STREET ADDRESS OF WELL Iorrr moi- ld -tel PV;2n2 4{n� � . _ �iltlri4��r'� 'f ❑ Domestic 10 WELL LOG or ABANDONMENT PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION Ql (9) PROPOSED USE: Industrial ❑ Muriteipal 'fffi� ( ) ❑ IrtigationlW Test Well ❑ Other Ll Fornnlim: Ddsotba by rotor, ehnredsr, elm of Monnet and strmcture, and show thane e a of aquhe h [I Dewater and the land and nnh. of the mWOMI in each stratum penetrated, whh et least one entry for oath - 0,vum of information. - owner's number of well i (4) TYPE OF WORK: (tt mora then ono) __ - i.+ Abandoned ❑ Ne+v well Method: Dug d Sored ❑ i Deepened ❑ CablaK Driven❑ G Reconditioned ❑ 41;% Rotary)k Jetted ❑ t� r Inches. 0 (5) DIMENSIONS: Diameterofwell_S �C Drglad feet, Depth of completed well %^� ft. G (6) CONSTRUCTION DETAILS, ► ► Lw ft a Casing Installed: '� � Dlarr'• ftOn' �' 10— C Welded ft. Dlem, tram- 6rf1• �. ft. L Thfe nstalled if Diam.from-eft >o -ft• {1 a Threaded 01— Perforellons: Yes No 5k s. Type of perforator used 0 SIZE of psrtomtbns in. by In. Irl 0 pert tralrons horn IL to ft• perforations from perforallons from ft. to 0 Screens: Yes No Manuracturar's Nam Type ► �► r9r .S'.9 /Y _ Model No. �► �r lir +~ Dlam. slot size tit►i.- from �7r _ tt Io till• Dian. Slot size , 0�S Irom ,^^ft.co C Gravel packed: Yes No ❑ Size at gravel AV-] i (3ravol placed from ^71 ► It to ft. ft Surface seal: yes! NoED TowhatdCpil? .2-�r Materiel used In soot �J7l�YFJJ 'X& { a y O Did any strata contain unusable water? Yes Z Type of water? Doptn of slrara U) Mediad of sealing strata 00 — -I4 0 (7) PUMP: Manuractirers Name � --- Type: O (8) WATER LEVEL 4'"d•s'n'Lude'°"t°°" c�7S R 1�Syt Almvrn rnaan sod l=, 102- G Statiebvel _ f!�_ M.bebwtopofwall Date G A icslan prossuro _.. Ibs, per square inch Date WArtesian water Is controlledby r�Zaa ivo, Den w O (y) W ELL TESTS: Drawdown is amount wator level is lowered w std Was a pump test mmje? Yes K No ❑ II yes, by whom N Yield: .:Fj!gal./min. v iih IL drawdown alter hrs. Q- Ftaowary data (time lakern as zero when pump turned off). (water level measured from well d top to watar lovely Winter Level 0 limp water Lwel Time Water Level Time s Dale of test - Baler les44 gal.rmin. wrlh _ ft, drawdown after i i lis. Alrtest ' gai.lmrn with stem set at IL for h.• Artesian flow g,p,m. Data Temperature of water Was a chemical analysis made? Yes K No ❑ ECY OWi-20 (9190 ' ' 1 MATERIAL 9d FROM TO Q - WorkStartadlr+� %e'�[ .19. Completed✓ 7- 19--2 WELL CONSTRUCTOR CER'TIFlCATION: I constructed BrAlor nccepl responsibifity for consuuclian of this well, and its compliance rvilh all +I hington Weil conslructari Standards. Materials used and the Info malion reported above are Srue to my hest ktnowredgo and bete f. NAME,lr ,p t—ItSot/+,r/ � Address r!%i 6 rJ fsfgnad) -'�-� LlcenseNo. 11-07-3 0 Contractor's RegistraMn ` No. Lit r�IEJC-`P.7j _ _ Date (USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY) Ecology Is wr Equal opportunity and Affirmative Action employer. For spe- cial accommodation needs, contact the Water Resources Program at (206) 407.6600- The TDD number is (206) 407.6005. d t— WAININGIOM STATE OE►AATMEIT OF E C O L O G Y Date of Field Vint A)p� Ocv� 4k'd LPera4e-d` by .� UNiQUE WELL i D NUMI3EA A -1- E 11 ! -CL X Y Z 1 2 3 WELL TAGGING FORM By ADDITIONAL WELL IDENTIFIERS Department of Health System ID Number E:5 7 5 (o Y Source Number SO-.,_ USGS Site Identification RECORD 'VERIFICATION Well Report available (please attach) ❑ Well Report not available O Venficatzon inconclusive WELL OWNERSHIP IF DIFFERENT FROM WELL REPORT Name USDA M I C. N A TI MAL 51— - Q 1 LC- C R D Street address _jB 3 5 BBA t, LA ICE a LV 0 S \A/ city is N P I A State A 9 851 a- 50,93 LOCATION OF WELL, IF DIFFERENT FROM WELL REPORT Well Address _ c2 q5 14a HWI ! SDuLn City L -CE E A '76 County JJ E F EEV-50h) T a l N R a d 4t/ w M Sec v4 P4 1A/ 'A of the 1n% k C3GPS (raw data) Latitude �_ 15 ❑ GPS (corrected) X Topographic Map Longitude [ 50 ❑ Survey ❑ Computer generated ❑ Other IN Digital Altimeter Elevation at land surface I.Aff fee meters (circle one) 5 Topographic Map A Other uS652Vy L O Q. W OC a► N_ t c O C O v M E O w c a► L O v M to e� O c ry L L ev t- 0 Z N W O -a A CD O O V W O C a, E t M a a� O a� s F- Add►t►onal information if available t + XLocation marked on topographic map (please attach) O Location marked on au photo (please attach) Water Right # GQ �R to 5 53-7 G I -4W9 A Priority Date Circle one Application Permit Cemficate Claim Exempt WELL CU ARACTERISTICS Physical Description of Well (size of casing type of well housing etc ) S_ al A CA5 tM 105 +EPY �. - kFiC nfK C MENS IriPNouSE M(lnl a Location of Well Identification Tag IM PUMP 0006C ATrA TCOC P t PE COMING OFF WELL HE -190 Was SupplementA Tag needed for ease of identifying well' );�No ❑ YES If yes where was tag placed9 Scale 124 000 (1 =2 000 ) SEMON a4 Indicate the location of the well within the Section by drawing a dot of -that pout —` Please ossa h Our form so she W it R p n and sub+nd it so the Department f E rosy Wase R s Pr gram A adquarsers W a td hikalw P g an P 0 B 47600 Oiympno WA 48504-7600 O D C a A E F G H M L K J + + N P Q R SEMON a4 Indicate the location of the well within the Section by drawing a dot of -that pout —` Please ossa h Our form so she W it R p n and sub+nd it so the Department f E rosy Wase R s Pr gram A adquarsers W a td hikalw P g an P 0 B 47600 Oiympno WA 48504-7600 •. ,,. �-rr�r���Xy.�,f�-ice t'--='�-bir'7�'a- �,----.�- ,,,ra �E i`' �{�'Y'� I M Q lt'' w i� C lid �.r J F.. F •�?.s�rf`}s "�! ^4•+ f 4r D R: r�.... :.moi �i�.. STA3t Or WA O"rt N r*" ._fit C" am m (t) ovk Nvx 0 ifar+e*„ C3 i W gwa fortiLL RL) EACdtof �P �. bo.r4e�inh dbc r Y ww t#eLlw iueslvAom ewr4c _ !: (1) ME QS ORK [ heck) m a...wa .vim �v tR.x fwwbk Wm a adr� a R a � �srrr �tr�r�as sva sawce6wt to E..r T 0 } P8�}riY.S��WME (AwAl (S) TYPE Oil WEUL flamrtse (] D 1i rnseti al O Asy D r*q Q �ci e,..y.j����V" Iron D W -V r- Ov O �+ D it ,. a�$ x 4a. , �, G} ,. t� w /Z. a. c.v o 177 to ca" (7) i'E1imu'nw-S ; 'W". �-.. 0 ", .-M+r•.w.. pcexacdtrnc tare n U _ Il 4) ..- bra'-,rtf...Cn. 4 �.,,_ ryr�crtlooa hvm W R 0 18) scams Wet tnrw rd y�C D w Div.. r o..x L`g0 fw r.+.. 6,5 b /66 6,� Di ft Sim rU Sq porn ft T. J+ (o) ooNsmucrwx C HN ptao" oo -A- fL (o — L Nrr aa'Gat me) ro id.d ' ex !M wK 6"Wt • T�nr efrrwr- a .f n . -.. 1' bio) WATE�t 4EVF1.S _Y. -- F, f IOL Ammal +' r t L { tfv, tri r "f .f!'LNa (l I) QPS1.L 7"EI33' f-" WAAI aril �1{ %ri.�r ra f15n . rxxr..•r deft ttti•. u .e rti aMe trte.n tt "..d a,n Wd ed hem vw &W to .ecce b" � 7 7f 9 .. �3 Y C NIX. �'�' ID _� awr��__it_ Er+r4x� iii _ iFrk L i{rtxstae rww as •'L4u� - ^r' -� y ' newer M .4r ter rbmar9 wsaydr xn++fe4 fv+t [ hIt- 14ewatwes brrc.[;tx�xxt.+ elnrrcxrr Yfs%lrirr+1 ■eE ew • r +� rft cdaa. JL -ear ,k (13) PUKE- xfr.at.t�uetYt +me.IX 1� 4 �!{�Q' �4 77T+ .7`GX�1.CEr-��-.. .� ,..LSa,•..,{,.�*, �iL.M' ��', (1°±�� ..5` W h DrMer's 61t1metL .1 . t .. �: tt This .nu as &wed under; g"t- trve to Me Inst of my inow+led: AAA b4L4 ra. NAM >.'dZ�1�10Ef+i� 7 di it Xddrep e��t -42 ,r e.i i O CL 4) OG fyy 's r C O C a:s R E rwI- to, s aW 16- 0 rO C l0 t,'1) C L Z N O O O V LU O C N E L CL a D t Filai OdgMe, and First Copy with WATER WELL REPORT Start Card Na, OQ 92 Den G � DepameM of Ecology Second Copy—Owners Copy STATE OF WASHINGTON Third Copy—Ddller'n Copy Water Rlpht Rermhk No. _ (1) OWNER: Nemo —Addraim (2) LOCATION OF WELL: Catmty-11 r � >i.fi u Soc _TSN., R -a-- W.M. (2a) STREET ADDDRESS OF WELL (or nearest scldrosa) .&Z Za/ S,4d, v i2ea (3) PROPOSED USE: Comastic induatrfat ❑ Municipal ❑ ❑ lratTeal Well ❑ Other ❑ 113 DeWoWater (10) WELL LOG or ABANDONMENT PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION Fom)ptblk Daacrlise by teen, choraoief, alxa of material and dlrectvr®, and show thickness at aquifem and the kind and nalwo of the material In each etratcwn pertetralnd, with atlaealarse entryfbramchthe egsoflMamnalroo. (4) TYPE OF WORK: Owner'anumberolwall {I1 mors then aha) Abandoned ❑ New well Method: Dug ❑-'tared ❑ Deepened ❑ Coble Driven ❑ Japed ❑ Reconditioned ❑ Rotary ❑cc MATERIAL FROM TO (5) .. DIMENSIONS: Olemeterofwoll - - e2�x�Inches. Orliled feel, Depth ofeompteledwall �_ ft. 0 - (6) CONSTRUCTION DE�TyAILS- Caelug lnallalied;r r Dlam, fromIf. to Warded ®r' Dlam, form ft, to _ n. Liner metalled ❑ Threaded ❑ Dlam. from ft. to H. Perforations: Yaa❑ No Type of perforator used SIZE of perforations —1n.by In. perlorstionsfrom - ff.to ft, perforattona from ff. to N. pert !lane from h. to,ff. scream: YOMNoLJ Manufacturer's Nor"t J7Q - Type /�� Model No clam.. __ Slotaixea from - 11 h.to�Q_fr. Dlam. Slotelxe om ft- to n•7. — 41 _ _� =a - ins - Gravel packed: YooLJ Nojjj Stre al gravel Gravel placed from_ ft. fa 5urlacseaal: YaiL_l No LtTowhdId IA? ,C 1ST, It. Materiel used In seal e+&tr Did any strata contain unusable water? yea❑ N.R Type of water? Depth of strata Method of aealtng strata oil - (7) PUMP: MenufactureesName Typo:. H.P (8)WATER LEVELS: Land nurfarseloysliaq above mean aaa level Static level ri 7. !f, below top of wall Odle Artesian preasura Ibe. per square inch Data Arleslen weler fa centroiled by _ Workalmded " , tg.. C.-Ow'ed S3 (9) WELL TESTS : crowd ie s uhf w or IeYat is fo+rArod tnslaw alalic isvel was epump toot made? YesLJ No L4 9yes,bywharn? Yield: goldmin.wHh ft, drawdown alter him - WELL CONSTRUCTOR CERTIFICATION: I constructed endfor accept responsibility for construction of this well, end'Ns compliance with all Washington well construction standards. Materials used and the Information reported above are true to my best knowledge and befief. NA _ " Reoovwy data (time taken es terowhan pump fumed ori) (water Ieue1 monsured from well lop to captor lavas Time Welwlarsl rano WeterLevrl Tlma watarLeral Dale of�lea�!} Berlantes!. iC.�ppRfmia.wikh ,tt.drawdown44tsfler firs. Alrtaat � gal./min. with stem set $1 It. for r� hm. Artesian flow q,p.m. Det$ + "� '%� Temp$ralafeatWolof Wes a chemical aealyeieMilitia? 'Yee❑ No& fPPaain, FINN, OR CORPORA iT$ir) (TYPE ON PAINT) Addles f + {Sdgnad PnLLOPUEM Icen9/No. Contract 'a p .,.�� Date IUSE ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY) ECYOtiO•t-20 (10197) •1929- -4mo-7 a.i L O CL W d N_ IF C O C O E Ir w C d s O V C M 0 s a.+ A r C V 4 itf 0 Z N O A ai O O V W y— O a+ C E L iZ d 0 Z PUS Original and r ret copy with Department at Ecology WATER WELL REPORT geoorltl �;s —'��e'a CDF7' Third Cao y—1)rtiDM's t apy 8TATZ OF WASMGTON (1) OWNER:' Nam (2) LOCATION OF from aeetlon (3) PROPOSED USE: nomese. VIndmatrlat ❑ Municipal ❑ irrigation ❑ Test Well ❑ Other ❑ (4) TYPE OF WORK: Owner's number at well (1f more as one)... • -. ._ . �..____ New well Method: Dug ❑ Bored ❑ Deepened []' Cable @--75rlven ❑ Reconditioned ❑ Rotary E] Jetted (J (5) DIMENSIONS' Diameter of well, ..._ ehea. Depth of completed 'wteli-_ it. (6) CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: Cttsin inetfllled:.� Dlam. from --&L ft. to _ ft. Thmilod ❑ Dlam. from -._.._._... ft. to ft. Welded pfi •• Diag7. ltOrll ._._ __._ ft. to __� !t. Perforations: Yes ❑ No d,— Type of perforator SM of perforations r _ _ _ __, in. by __..-_-_-..._._. in. perfbratious from . _. _-- ft. to _ _ __ _ . ft. perlorsuans trore r _ ft. to _ __ ft. pesiorations from & to — ._ ft. SCrCt'm Yen I3 No &--' Mamrtactn[er's Name.. Type- model No Dlam, _--- Slot size from _ __._, ft. to ___ — ft. Dim. Slot else .__- __ from ft, to ft: (gravel pae3led: Yea ❑ No I. sizer at gravel: Caravel placed from ___ _-_...s . ft. to _____ QQ_��__ ft. SUrfaC8 3"l% Yes &--No O To what depth? Material used 1A Did i my strata contain unusable water? Yes Cl No ❑ Type of water?--•_-_. — Depth of strata__—_-_ Method of sealing strata oe.......-____- (7) PUMP: m ufaotume. Na,,_ Type:. (8) WATER LEVELS: Lard -surface elevation / above mean sea level...... fit, Static ],avei ... _ _�„t,,.l! _._._-__fs. below top of wrtll DatoH.t Artesian pressure __ _ _ _ ... _._lba. per square Inch Artesian water is controlled __._ valve, els.) (9) WELL TESTS: Drawdown 15 amount water level Is lowmd below static level Was a pump test made? Yes ❑ No Q U yes, by whom?_..._..._____._... �... Yield: pal,/min, with ft. drawdown after hrs. ,. It .. 1. Recovet7 data {t{ntm taken as Sero when pump turned off) (water level we rneaaurcd rsm ll top to water level) Time Wath Level Time Water LevelTime Watet Level .... ......... .... ._........... .... .... ............ .._............_._....__........... Date df test Bailer tese_'lI�•YLgal /m1n. with _!t. drawdown aster__ lira: Artesian Dow- _ ._ _.__r _g,pm. Date...._,_.__ Tetaperature of water.-._— Was it chemical analysis made? Yea ❑ No 90Y WPI -20 Application No... ..... .......... - Permit No. _ . , . Aft -ii, Seo, ._ T17..N., it._2 .w.M. (10) WELL LOG: - WELL DRUAXR'S STATEMENT: This welt was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is true to the hest of may knowledge and belief. or dor))"atlonl iTYM or I/ - ppi/ (wall DrWorr)) j ��y1 c.� Iia....... ..Q..& �._-_- __ Date......!...:._ q 1B�J (USX ADDITIONAL SSlerS rr NZC S ARY) L O CL a N •s C O C O E L w C t L O C 2 flJ t C t� L L }R O Z H ft1 O i71 O 0 V W O C E a.+ L lQ CL f1J F' - File Origimil and First Copy with Department of Ecology Second Copy—Or's Copy titled Capin— Drlllwnecr's Copy (I) OWNER: t__4 (2) LOCATION OF distance from section or WATER WELL REPORT STATE OF WASH NGTO14 Application No. Permit No, (3) PROPOSED USE: Domestiq nduserial ❑ Municipal p (10) WELL LOG: Irrigation ❑ Test Well ❑ Other ❑ Formation: Describe by. color, character, sine of material and structure, and p tr aT death one a and stature of the mate riot in each stratum penetrated, w ntry for each change of fos, lon. (4} TYPE OF WORK: Owner's n ben of well Show a Hess a agaa��a€��a kind Y fit rn an one)........ ............._-.--••-- FROM TO New well Method: Dug ❑ Bored ❑ Deepened 11 Cable Driven ❑ Reconditioned ❑ Rotary ❑ Jetted ❑ (5) DIMENSIONS: Diameter of well.. cbes. Driiltd.. _fit. Depth of completed wet[_. _ 3t 7-f . - _ .11 1'T V — (6) CONSTRUCTION TAILS: Casing installed:._ •• Diam. from _.6— ft. to -.1 t. Threaded ❑ Diam- from ft. to wel.ird Z'--4 .._____." D M. from .... ... I.— it. to Perforations: Yes ❑ Na [� Type of perforators SIZE of perforations ___ in. by ___ ..._.._._--_ in. perforations from It. to _ _ _— it. perforations from .__ _ _ ft. to . _ _.—. ft, perforations f ft, to �µ ._. _.. ft. Screens; yes C]No cl `/ — Manufactureeis Model No__- Dlam.---•__-- Slot size .. ... from ..._-- ft. to !t. Dlam. , __._ Slot size from ft, to ft. Gravel packed: Yes ❑ No [6 Size of gravel: _......_..__ Gravel placed fromit. to _... ..._.... _. it. Surface seal: Yes Norl jwha� depth? Material used to seaLdr- ............ Did any strata contain unusable water? Yes ❑ No Type of water? -------- ._....._.__. Depth of Method of sealing strata o6_,__�.--•--_....._..•...... _.___.__....._ (7) PU=P: Manufacturer's Type: (8) WATER LEVELS: Land -surface elevation above mean sea level.. below top of well Date...,..w._..__..._ Artesian pressure ....... „„,.,._._.. --lbs, per square inch._.._. -- Artesian water Is controlled bY__. _._.____. .. ._ ,..,_..--•---•-_ (Cap, valve, etc,) (9) WELL TESTS• l)rswdawn amount water level is lowered below stable level Was a pump test made? Yes ❑ No ❑ It yes, by whom? ............... ........... Yfeld:. Thal./min. with ft, drawdown after bra. Recovery data (time talten as zero when pump turned off) (water level measured from well top to water level) Time Water Level Time Water LevetTime Water Level »........................,._............................ tes,.�._ ..._� Data of Wt Hailer _.... Hailer to {l ..oUrranc , vntb.�........ ft. drawdown Artesian owT _ .._.._._ ��— (l,p m. Date .......... ._„ ,,._..... e Temperature of water-__- Was a chemical analysis made? Yes ❑ No 94 Work started— ' ' r, ?- I& j Completad_-. WELL DRILLEWS STATEMENT: This well Was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. % pp** 7 License ltNn ..... . t]ltte..= ....., 19l �..�... ............... ...... (USE ADDITIONAL SILMTS IF NECESSARY) S. F. No. 7356--O!8 -(Rev. 4-71). 3 Y2- c� A 4 'v I (:e it e, 7—r4 i lam- Pa rA RECEIVED JUN 16 2016 Well Tagging Form WA State Department 145flrvq inrr(�oiEcology (SWRO) Unique Well 10 Tag Number. / o Use this form ONLY if an WELL REPORT IS FOUND (Attach the original well report to this form) If a water well report is not available, please complete a "Water Well Report for an Existing Well" form. This form is available at Ecology's headquarters office by calling 360-407-6650 or e-mail mbru461@ecy.wo.gov. Well ownership, If Different From Wefl Re rt LL-"A¢:t'r � �" '°'5M ITI+ sW AddrMw - Location of Well, If DWerent From Well Report 76 "Saatlo n, rwrnatll� artd �*+S1a a+'* fetatl tlr�t! - W«I,M,s ;Z.�? ea rewnaAlp Barge O aw pprNs MMUtes seoonda �. LalKuda Degrees Minutes Seconds Er OOM of tend sufaora 110 Ohm O -M' fdradronel � �r,� (J. % ��- Uj NT -M Well Characterledca torstlon dVW# ldontlfkatfon Tag W Scale 1,24,000 (1'=2,000') Indicate the location of the well within the Section by drawing a dot at that point section 2-272 PAN Q JILc t��-PU ?�} C ujo' T-bL �� pe LULL - U�1��"�-�jUZ�C X11, ,� 7�y 7t'/j -�3�,,. Second Cr)pY—v�%nlLi"S Cups' Third cotty -- nr+ltor•s C.Py STATE OF WASHE GTON PernJ1. No, (1) OWNER: Names.......... _ Address ........... .. -._ (2) LOCATION OF WELL: (' U U FL L — to see....... T_,.,.,;'_ N., R.....-. W.M. it.:... ti+g r�ur, d+slancc hlrrtt •aecLian of SIII IIL Yfhlo>+ '101 Ile; (d1 PROPOSED USE: Dom- t is end ustriat i'; btum�fP;J Q h'ngatiun _J 'rest %veli t:; oti,er 1-1 (4) TYPE OF WORK: v°" -,mom u1 well , II n.uf a thou ones 1111..._ ,.. New well J :bfcr-liod Dug [ 'dared Deepenerl Cable Q. Driven D Reconditioned ❑ notary Q Jetted ❑ (S) DIMENSIONS: Dwrrwtar of well _ _ _.,.. inches_ Drlllert _ ._ 1t Depth of completed well. __ .ft. (6) CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. Casing installed: _. Dlarn froin rt to _ fI. Threaded ❑ ._.....,.._ " Dtam, from .. ft to _ _. ... ft. Welded D _" Diarc. from ft. to _ -..- , ft. Perforations: Yes O No CJ Type oI perforator uaed.. - - 517F, o` perforations - In by .. - In. 1111 ,1111. _. perforations from _. _ ft.. to ... ... 1111. ft, _ perrorattons from ,,.. ,1111 ft- to 1111_ ft _ perforations front .- -.-. It to Screens: Yes C • No C] Manufar.Lurer'S _`lame. Tyke- ...-°..... ...r...--- -. Model No.---- - - -- -------- ._. Dlaln. 1 1 11. S1oL site _..__,_ .. from _ .. ft, to 111:1` 1111 ft. Diann 11_11 Slot size _... Crum - ., ft to .- ft. Gravel packed: Yes ❑ Na i) Size of gravel :...... ... ... .. _.. Gt•avel placeG frorn ..._.-_..- - ... ft. to 1111. ft_ Surface seal: Yes L] No p To what depula Material used Ln =41 .......:' ...... ......... ......... Did any strata milt;tin unusable water? Yes C7 No f9 Type of water?.. - 1111... Depth of strata. .., Method of sealing strata off - ._ .........»......._....- .-1111..^-... (7) PUMP: Manu4actttrer's Name., T5•on.---................................._.»...�- ., _.._. 1111.. If.T'..... ...,..... (8) WATER LEVELS Lnllrl-sttrf:rce elevation above meir i sea level _ . ft. itat4r level -. _. .. ...--__.....ft, below top of well Att.cstan pressure - _1111 _.. ............. Ihs. per 1glulrre inch Date -.. .".». Artesior water is mntrolled by -it 1111 1111 (Cap, valve. ctc.l �- (9) WELL TESTS: Drawdown 15 amount water leVel is lowered below c[atta levi�l Was a pu np test made? Yes ^ No 71 Ir yrs by warm t7 "t'ICtri.+.il Jrrn rt u']tl7 ft tlt':r tvt!ir w[I. A1tl` Ito l. _111,'�_ v.-- ftecnve_ry rl:dn (time takr.n ah >•ern�wllen pump turned off) (water level mu aas:rsl ftnrn well Lop to water level; Cane Warer Level ! Time Water Level Water LEE uetl Date of test _. .. - Biller test.-. gaVmin with .. .. -ft drawdown after hrh. Artesiun flow , - ..I . -g.p M. Date 1111 . 1'e1T11jeroturc of water_ .. Was a chemical annly.is made^ Yes Q Dro ❑ S. F. No 7356-0S--(i3cv d-71 . (10) WELL LOG: Forinatlon: r.1L•scrkbe bu colo?, charaerrl', size al m4rerwt rood itrtretar-:. rirtd shoui iliickn Cir n.( nCftslrr. rs Dull the ktnsd and rwlurr a) Cha n:ctur;ef -irr crcclr Uraturn fICIVIre led., with at Irrwt mc entre, far each chnnpa 0 )o -motion. w MATERIAt t� FR(3%1 TO 6 Work sto r -ted_ .-- -_:. 1111... lu _ . Cu:nplet.eu .. - .....:._......_..... 19..._.. WELL DRILLER'S STATEMENT: This well Was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. NAME—: ...............__.-,......................,.......-.......,,.........,..........._V ..�......... (Parson, firm, or oarparatrun) (Type or rent Address...:....r..._._................... .... 1 Sign ed j ..._ ......................_,........... _..,.,,,.,..,..,,..,,.....-,.._....,................ {Well Dd1lCr1' License No . .. ..................... _ -, Date ._ .._.. 1.1.11 ., . 19...,._. IUSE ADDITfONAL SkIrtTS IF NECESSARY) t` O CL O to s C O C O R E V O 2 C s s` O C R R M 0 ate.+ C R L L O Z N d O al O O 0 W O C d7 E L CL a a� s File Orlgirwl andcoFlogust Copy with Departmtint of Ey Second Copy -- Ow`ncYs Copy Third C6py -- Driller's Copy WATER WELL REPORT STATE OF WASMGMN Application No. ._...__........... _........ ._ Permit No (I) OWNIIi: Name. • ll ..{•4 . ..GJSI_ _.1L.T.,» _ - Address...,7�e.. �_I,i{/ ll y ilr (2) LOCATION OF WELL: County...,.at�.�lr_.�...._ Searing, and distance from section or subdtvlsion corner (3) PROPOSED USE: Domestic a- Industrial ❑ Municipal ❑ Irrigation ❑ Test Well ❑ Other ❑ (4) TYPE OF WORK; Owner's number of well (li more than one)........_......_._.....__...._ New well :R Method: Dug ❑ Bored ❑ Deepened ❑ Cable Q Driven 1] Reconditioned 1] Rotary R; Jetted d (5) DIMENSIONS: Diameter of well .........__+_,..._. inches. Drllled.__....._;r-_,Z» -ft, Depth of completed well-—> -4---1t. (6) CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: Casing installed: fw_ Diam. from ft. to 7 ft. Threaded ❑ Dlam. from .... ft. to ft. Welded W _»_' Dlam. from ............ ft. to .». it. Perforations: Yea ❑ No a Type of perforator used..__._.._._,___._....Y.___..._. _—___ „ SIZE of perforations -- - - In. by .___w---- in. perforations from ... ft. to perforations from ft. to perforations fmTn _ __ _ . ft. to Screens: Yes (j No jR Manufacturer's ....... Model No —_— Diana. _.____ Slot size __ __._ from _.__.._._. ft. to _ .—_ ft, Dlam. ___., _» Slot size ..._ _ from _.. ..__.. ft to r __ _ it. Gravel packed: Yea ❑ No A size of gravel:...._....Y ... _ ._ Gravel placed from __—_____ ft. to _..._»....... _...._.. it. SnrfilCe Seal: yes ca No ❑ To wbat .depptth7 ft. Material used in Did any Strata contain unusable water? Yes ❑ No [4 Type of water?._..___.._....____..... Depth of strata-.,,.»—__,_,..» Method of sealing strata aR_ ..—.._............._ ._ » ._ __ ...,,... (7) PUMP: aaanutactumr S Nero e __rr aC.r Type:. (8) WATER LEVELS: Land -surface nlwivd n above mean sea leve.... ».&'Q.___tt, Static level below top of well Date/ 3.%r Artesian pressure __�__.__s—_lbs. per square inch Date Artesian water is controlled by—_.,.._.___.___.._.____._ __,.».._, ,. (CaD. valve. etoJ (9) WELL TESTS: nrawdown Is amount water level is lowered below static level Was a pump test made? Yes ❑ No OR If yes, by whom? ... ................. ...._...... Y1eld: gal.Jmin. with it, drawdown after hrs. Recovety data(time taken as zero wben pump turned off) (water level measured from well top to water level) Time Water Level Time Water LevelTime Water L¢vel .............................................. ...................... .„............... ........................ Data of test Hailer test_-�-spj .gal./min. with -- t2,= A. drawdown Artesian flow._...�-�,..._—_�_..._._g.psn. Dztoe A,.R% Temperature of water_ 1r-4_. Wes a rhengcW aoalysls made? Yes ❑ Nopt S. F. No. 7336--OS—(Rev, 4-71). (14) WELL LOG: Work started____.»-__.__-,_.,,,• 79Completed-..»....__.—_.,, 19-._. WELL DRILLER'S STATEMENT: This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is true to the best o4 my knowledge and belief. NAME._/-1t..J.P.-.Z; ( erson, 11rm. or corpora ) ('Type or print) Address.,... .Li i•L�,1..„(.tP...._..1C/.........,�•ta%.�a........... [Signed] ........ ..... ( Well Drillo-rl License No. ... ,C1....L.. .......... Dat'?..u..t`�,eZ...JQ...:... 19.2.+ (USE ADDITIONAL SEEEEr3 Dr NECZSSARY) 3 Fite Orfirtnal and Pirst Copy with Dep.,u"*nt of F,eology Second Copy�---Uwner's Copg Third CovY - Dri)lcr'x Capt r '� p� WATER VIWEIL REPORT STATE OF WASMNGTON (I) OWNER: tlamc__-- ik�.Sf._.__....�1F1C'ci4A/_� _ (2) LOCATION OF WELL: Bearing and distance from avetion or sub&vlston corner Q 6,4 C - tD (3) PROPOSED USE: Domestic elndustrial ❑ Municipal ❑ LTIgation ❑ Test Well ❑ Other ❑ (4) TYPE OF WORK: Owner'.number of well (it more than one).,.. _ m ........ New well W Method: Dug ❑ M�Bored ❑ Vl Deepened ❑ Cable Wo Driven ❑ Reconditioned ❑ Rotary ❑ Jetted ❑ 4.0G (5) DIMENSIONS: Diameter of well ._..__ - roaches. C Drilled- r,&___ft. Depth of completed G (6) CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: R Casing installed: _.6_., Dram. from f',L_ ft. to _ ,�f ft. EThreaded ❑ ""Dram: from _.__ it. to Welded 20' " Dla.n. from tL to ft C Perforations: Yea•❑ No itis Tgpe of perforator i.+ S1ZL' of perforations _ ,_ In. by L_ �__ perforations from _ _ _ ft. to ft, 0 ^� perforations from - ft. to V -.. perforations from . it. to ft. Screens: yaa ❑ No Manufaaturees 0 Type-.-- _.._ v. -- _ Model No-. Dram. „ Slot size ....__- from ..,.»..__- ft. to ..,_ ft. iDIM..___ _ _ Slat size from -- IL to Gravel packed: Yes ❑ No Me' size of gravel: +' Gravel placed from _ M _ _.. _ _ ___ it. to _._,._ ___ ft. C Surface seal: yes Iid• ?Vo T ha! .d tth7 R Material used In Did any strata contain unusable water? Yes ❑ No RO Type of water?.._—_'__....- Depth of O Method of sealing strata Z (7) PUMP: Manufacturer'szvs•ne_�._____�.--__.._---..----_- N (S) WATER LEVELS: Land -surface elevation AAAW above mean sea level... t. Static level -.- _-:- fit. below tap of well Date._y7 73) Artesian pressuro ba. per square incb Date_ o Artesian water is controlled by____.-�_ 0 (Cap, valve, etc,) v W (9) WELL TESTS: Dratndown Is amount water level Is lowered below stalls level OWas a pump test made? Yea ❑ No ❑ U yes, by whom7,..._.__..._.___...._...._ r Yield: gal.lmin. with ft. drawdown after bra. C W E ,. Recovery data (time taken as Zero when pump turned of?) (water level maaaured from well top to water level) 21. Time Water Laael Time Water Level Time Water Levet i? ,. ............. ........ _..... ...... _......, ,. _ _. _............ ..... ,.._.......... ,.,,. ........ _........,._.....,»... .................. ...... ........................ Date of test Bailer t.st,_4a _gal,/min. with,...,... ft, drawl atter__ Ars. Artesian trow. _ _ - .---.g p nn. Datp-.! _ _. _, Temperature of water--------- Was a chemical anslyais made? Yes ❑ No ❑ 7A-) �4 Application No. .._._..__.w_............. Permlt ,.. WELL LOG: v /?- SE4. a Work starte IL_Z4LV_ompleLed_.. .__ `.. '...., 19._x• WELL DRILLER'S STATEMENT: This well was drilled under my jurisdiction and this report is true to the best of mfr knowledge and belief. _i (Person, Srm, or corporati/onn)� (Type or print)Address.0.4....�CaQ....._..� L Cfl+!4'.........jv* k ( Well Driller) License No ... _........ 0../�{ .__...... Da .._.R...7 .................. (USE ADDITIONAL MIEETc Dr ==SSARY) S. F. No. 7356-09,-1 Rev. 4-71). _ b�y z