Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SDP1992-00015
/e-0 ,---e--17, ;fid' Com' titi et �"k �} / ,' .t .8... as ROUTING SCHEDULE FOR PRELIMINARY P 1VIENT IRE20NIM NflAT10NS S REQUESTS FOR COM ,r ' 0 ? YES NO �� �, Health � ` "� �' Jefferson County for 0 Department Request for cemments to Dept's and public Works APO's (date sent y 0 Jefferson County � � � e.- ._— � Department 6 CommentsSdue 4- ,r, Assessor N ❑ Jefferson County PLAT/ PUD #1 Pending Threshold ❑ ❑ Jefferson County Determination ti6„44,e,-,4,07-,' f . SEPA �n Res to Leader ❑ 0 School District # y 7 SEPA to Responsible Official �- 0 Jefferson notice to Leader; publish Department Transit Transportation _— on hearing ; posting 0 onapplicant y notices and affidavit to � 0 pepartme t of�o'�' ��--��1/�.$, " +' Hearing nctices to Dept's/AP0's DepartmentnApT Mild ife Examiner and 0 ❑ or to Hearing Adjacent Property Owners Staff rep � 0 applicant hearing with PC/Hearing 0 Fire Protection District # — Recommendation to BOCC Public ` s '� Examiner i 0 �'" Port Townsend Utility y ' Notice to app 0 0 Point No Point Treaty Council licant 0 Hearing Notice to Leader; — publish ❑ 0 posting notices/affidavit to applicant/representative 0 Other: Parks Advisory Board Port of Port Townsend, etc. \\\*%. f.'" ff 7 7 ii (.. .. /4_, 7 a i-Ci (-1"/CE- dz c --c,..-,) _07/ i / t,,,V- a-7d - --( , ,o-Vc ,f,p1.- 0- ..---------'?0 - i _i_z;:____ r,jr"----, i li p l /0/3 v 4-,,, ---e.. ' -')-Q-Ave".-1.7 i'A-rci- ^ ,,,leii, _ t " etth z 1111111111111111111111.11.111.111.11 Nco LINTY PERMIT CENTER �� °� JEFFERSON COUNTY 411111- 1P, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 , 1SBIN BEFORE THE NTNG COUNTYATR OF JEFFERSON IN THE MATTER OF a request ) FILE NO.IZA92-0046 For determination that Revisions ) To the Canoe Cove Development ) FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS, Approved plan qualify as minor ) Under provisions of Section 2.15.03.003 ) Of County Ordinance No.08-0408-96 )AND DECISION Zonin Administrator's Decision: pertinent I h ave reviewed and considered the referenced Minor Project Revisions, supporting documents, and other pe informatio , and the staffs recommendations. I hereby: the revisions as minor Adopt the findings and recommendations memorandum dated May21e1998.eviw 'sion and approve in nature,in accordance with staff Reject the recommendation of Development Review Staff and find that a change to the staffs recommendation is necessary. DATED THIS 21st DAY OF May 1998. JEFFERSON COUNTY ZONING AtMINISTRATOR _, ' AL SCALF,Director of Com'nity Development Public Works Development Review Road Approach Buildin Environmental Health Subdivision, Zoning ts00 `' _ 4, Septic Permits Permitsoa & poach Building fermi Water Review & Shoreline Permits Inspectia� �O� ddresses FAX: (360) 379-4451 (360) 379-4450 LOG ITEM _u CANOE COVE DEVELOPMENT (LP08-92, IZ46-92 & SDP92-0015) FINDINGS RELATIVE TO PRELIMINARY APPROVALS GRANTED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A mixed use development consisting of attached and detached single family residential, condominium multi-family residential units, renovation of the west wing of the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Restaurant building (west wing of the old alcohol plant) to create residential artist studio condominiums, a restaurant, and a health club (recreational center with a swimming pool), construction of access roads, utilities, parking facilities consisting of 124 spaces, and designation of open space. Includes demolition of the east wing of the alcohol plant, which had previously been converted to a hotel. A conditional shoreline substantial development permit was issued on October 18, 1993 for the above-described project. Shoreline permits expire two years after permit approval, unless the County has granted construction, or substantial progress, or a one-year extension. A revised single residential phase consisting of 25 lots was granted final approval on November 26, 1996. Minimum building setback variances for several proposed multi-family structures weregranted to permit front lot line setback of 15 feet, rear lot line setback of 10 feet, and for zero lot line structures, a 5 feet on one side of attached structures. The following table shows details of the approved project. Use # Lots # Units Area Attached 44 44 Residential Detached 5 5 Residential Condominium - 1 21 Lot 5, approx. Multi-family 14-2 Bdrm. Flats 47,608 sq. ft. & 7-3 Bdrm. Townhouses Artist Studio 1 8 -1 Bdrm. In Lot 6, approx. Condominium existing building 80,788 sq. ft. Condominium- 1 63 (3 bldg., 21 Lot 49, approx. Multi-family units each), 42-1 83,945 sq. ft. Bdrm Flats & 21 2-Bdrm. Flats Total Residential 52 141 Lots/Units 1 Open Space 4 (tracts A, B ,E & N/A 3.47 acres F) Commercial (pier) 1 (tract C) N/A 0.12 acres Commercial 1 (tract D) N/A unknown (tidelands) Total Area 25.3 acres FINDINGS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED REVISIONS TO CANOE COVE APPROVAL (AKA Canoe Cove, Revised Proposal Name = Lands End) REVISION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A mixed use development consisting of detached single-family residential, condominium multi-family residential units, marina services (storage lockers, locker rooms, change and shower facilities, laundry facilities, restroom, care room, & small convenience store), primary restaurant and lounge, health spa/recreation area, swimming pool, facility services, general reception, banquet facilities, secondary lounge, reception center, construction of a three-level parking garage consisting of 516 parking spaces, access road improvements, and designation of open space. The following table shows details of the proposed revisions to the preliminary approved project. Use # Lots # Units Area Detached 25 (Villas By The 24 7.3 acres Residential Sea Plat) Hospitality Suites 6 Level 52, approx. 1 Bdrm. 2500 sq. ft. Studio Suites 15 3 levels approx. 20,800 sq. ft. ea. Condominium - 42 (3 bldgs, # 1= 4 levels, approx. Bay view 12 units, # 2=15 3900 sq. ft. ea. units, #3 =15 units), 2-1 Bdrm Flats & 40 2- Bdrm. Flats Mansion Suites 48 total, 24 1 4 levels approx. bdrm units & 24 2 20,000 sq. ft. bdrm units Loft Suites 8 - 2 bdrm units 1 level, approx. 14,200 sq. ft. Total Residential 143 2 Lots/Units Open Space N/A Greater Commercial (pier) N/A Same Commercial N/A Unknown (tidelands) Total Area 25.3 acres SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITTING SDP-92-15 Permit Approval: The Jefferson County Board of Commissioners granted approval of a conditional shoreline substantial development permit October 18, 1993. The Department of Ecology December 15, 1993 approved the conditional shoreline development permit. Page 3 of the permit, under NOTICE: # 3 states: Construction pursuant to this permit will not begin nor is it authorized until thirty (30) days from the date of filing as defined in RCW 90.58. 140(6) and WAC 173- 14-090, or until all review proceedings initiated within thirty days from the date of such filing have terminated, except as provided in RCW 90.58.140(5.a-c). Construction or substantial progress toward construction of the permitted development shall begin within two (2) years from the date of this permit and completion of the permitted activity shall be accomplished within five (5) years from the date of this permit. Substantial Progress: For the first phase (Villas by the Sea) construction or substantial progress toward construction began by the submittal of construction plans for roads, storm water management and erosion control. Construction plans were submitted to the Department of Public Works during October 1995 and approved on November30, 1995. Road construction and storm water management facility construction inspection took place during October 1996. Time Requirements of Permit: A shoreline development permit is valid for a period of five (5) years. The subject shoreline development permit was validated by DOE on December 15, 1993, and therefore, would expire on December 15, 1998. Said permit, per above, requires completion of the permitted activity within five (5) years from the date of the permit. Related to permit extensions, WAC 173-27-090 (2) (b) states "authorization to conduct development activities shall terminate five years after the effective date of a shoreline permit." Permit Extension: Jefferson County can approve a single extension for a period not to exceed one year based on reasonable factors, if a request for an extension has been filed before the expiration date and notice of a proposed extension is given to parties of record and DOE. 3 • Is the Proposed Revision Consistent with Applicable Urban Environment Policies and Performance Standards? Examples include: • Building Height • Access to and enhance enjoyment of the shoreline for a substantial number of people • Pedestrian and visual access to and along the waterfront area • Provide public views to the water • Preserve and enhance significant architecture and historical buildings • Preserve and protect unique natural features of the urban shoreline • Parking facilities located on upland side of buildings away from shorelines • Is the use classified as a water-dependent, water related or water enjoyment use • Public Access provisions dedicated/recorded Do The Proposed Revisions Constitute Substantial Development? Guiding regulation employed is Chapter 173-27 WAC, Shoreline Management Permit and Enforcement Procedures. WAC 173-27-100 Revisions to Permits "A permit revision is required whenever the applicant proposes substantive changes to the design, terms or conditions of a project from that which is approved in the permit. Changes are substantive if they materially alter the project in a manner that relates to its conformance to the terms and conditions of the permit, the master program and/or the policies and provisions of chapter 90.58 RCW." Conclusions: 1. Canoe Cove, the area identified as tract B (1.02 acres) was reviewed and approved as open space (ingress, egress, utilities, parking, public access, landscaping, recreation, and storm drainage). 2. Lands End, three condominium buildings and open space are proposed on tract B. The Bay View condominiums contain 42 residential units. 3. The original permit review did not include review for compliance with applicable shoreline program policies and performance standards of three condominium buildings on this part of the project site. 4. This does not constitute substantial development according to the County Shoreline Master Program and the provisions of WAC Shoreline Management Permit and Enforcement Procedures. 5. These changes do not require a new permit as suggested by the above shoreline regulations. 6. The changes qualify as minor and are consistent with the requirements Jefferson County Ordinance No. 08-0408-96. Dated this 21st day of May, 19987 Jerry Smith, Associate Planner, Development Review Division 4 i STATg -7" 'Nt 1889,5 ?1 : - STATE OF WASHINGTON 111 1g97 r _ DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY P.O. Box 47775 • Olympia, Washington 98504-7775 • (360) 407-6300 June 24, 1997 Mr. John Cannon Port Hadlock/KCS Ltd 310 Alcohol Loop Road Port Hadlock, WA 98339 Steve Zuvela/Waterfront Construction Dear Mr. Cannon: 5b/P-00/5 Re: b ?-a41- Re: Jefferson County Permit #SDP 95-0008 John Cannon- Applicant Revised Shoreline Management Permit# 1997-SW-00525-A The subject Revised Shoreline Permit was approved by and received by this office on June 13, 1997. The 21 day appeal period will terminate July 7, 1997, due to the holiday . At your own risk, construction may begin during this appeal period provided all other federal, state, and local laws regulating such construction have been complied with. The Shoreline Hearings Board will notify you by letter if this permit is appealed. Sincerely, a r Jeffree Stewart Shoreline Specialist Shorelands and Water Resources Program JS:cI RECREV.WP cc: Lauren Mark, Jefferson County FILING A PETITION FOR REVIEW WITH THE SHORELINES HEARINGS BOARD To file a Petition For Review(appeal) of a shoreline permit decision with the Shorelines Hearings Board (Board), you must comply with the requirements of RCW 90.5 8.180 and WAC 461-08- 055. The Petition For Review must be received by the Board within 21 days of the "date of filing" as defined by RCW 90.58.140(6) and WAC 173-14-090. The petitioner must also serve copies of the petition on the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General within seven days of filing the Petition For Review with the Board. The "date of filing" for 'Substantial Development Permits 'Locally denied Conditional Use Permits 'Locally denied Variance Permits •Permit Revisions is the date Ecology received a complete permit filing. The "date of filing" for 'Locally approved Conditional Use Permits •Locally approved Variance Permits is the date Ecology mailed its final permit decision. The"date of Filing" for *projects receiving Substantial Development AND Conditional Use/Variance permits is the date Ecology mailed its final permit decision on the Conditional Use and/or Variance. The Petition For Review (appeal) must contain: 1. The name, mailing address and telephone number of the appealing party, and of the representative, if any; 2. The appealing party's legal residence or principle place of business within the state; 3. A concise statement of the grounds upon which the petitioning party considers the permit or decision to be unjust or unlawful. If one of the grounds for appeal is failure to comply with the State Environmental Policy Act (RCW 43.21C), six copies of the applicable environmental impact statement must be included with the petition, if available. 4. A copy of the decision or permit appealed; 5. A copy of the permit application filed with the local government pursuant to RCW 90.58.140. 6. The relief sought, including the specific nature and extent. 7. A statement that the petitioning party has read the Petition For Review and believes the contents to be true, followed by the party's signature and that of the representative. If the petitioning party is unavailable to sign the Petition For Review, it may be signed by the representative. WHERE TO FILE PETITIONS FOR REVIEW The original and one copy of the Petition For Review must be filed with: Environmental Hearings Office Shorelines Hearings Board 4224 6th Avenue SE Building 2, Rowe Six P.O. Box 40903 Lacey, WA 98504-0903 FAX: (360) 438-7699 One copy must also be filed with each of the following: Department of Ecology Shorelands& Water Resources Program Shoreline Appeals Coordinator 300 Desmond Drive, Lacey P. O. Box 47690 Olympia, WA 98504-7690 FAX: (360) 407-6535 Office of the Attorney General Ecology Division 629 Woodland Square Loop SE. Lacey P. O. Box 40117 Olympia, WA 98504-0117 FAX: (360) 438-7743 The local government whose permit or decision is being appealed. The permit applicant. If you have questions, please call the Shorelines Hearings Board at 360-459-6327. The Board's FAX number is(360) 438-7699. Or, call Ecology's Shorelines Appeals Coordinator at 360-407- 6528, or FAX(360) 407-6535. Ecology is an Equal Opportunity and Affumsuvo Action Employer. For special accommodation need,,contact the Shorelands and Water Resource Program ADA Coordinator at(360)407-6604. Tho TDD number is(360)407-6006. 05/21/98 02:42 4070284 002 , ni „VAT STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY P.O. Box 47775 • Olympia, Washington 98504-7775 • (360) 407-6300 April 20th, 1998 Jefferson County Commissioners 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Re: Application for Lands End Shoreline Permit Revision Over the course of the past year I have worked on behalf of the Department of Ecology with Jefferson County,making changes as needed to a plan for Lands End,an urban scale development near Port Hadlock.The base plan was prepared by Arca Architecture and Urban Design Corporation and Tillman Engineering.The revised plan,which reflects our negotiations during this period, is meant to replace what was previously known as Canoe Cove and given shorelines approval by the County and the State. This letter acknowledges resolution of several concerns and objectives for the Department of Ecology,relative to Shoreline Management Act policies.Please note,this letter does not necessarily cover every possible issue that could be raised by citizens, nor does it attempt to speak for the Permit Center,which may have separate or additional issues.That said,I believe that this revised design represents a significant improvement to the previously approved plan for Canoe Cove. At eurdingly,Ecology wishes to express its support for the plan;subject to the incorporation of those conditions,elements and standards that have been negotiated with the applicant;as follows: 1. In the upland areas along Edgewater Court,east from the dock,building setbacks have been increased,and restrictive covenants will require homeowners to maintain the native vegetation already established there as a riparian buffer zone.The design team has agreed to reconfigure residential footprints such that the buffer zone is not encroached upon,either by the foundation or by decks extending into the fifty-foot riparian zone. When clear need can be demonstrated,some very minor encroachments may be allowed,subject to concurrence by the County and Ecology. 2. It is understood there is no need for armoring the shoreline at the base of these bluffs, and the applicant agrees to preserving a natural appearance and maintaining optimal habitat values of the intertidal area by not allowing bulkheads to be installed here. LOG ITEM .• 0 # 05/21/98 02:43 4070284 003 ti* Jefferson County May 20, 1998 Page 2 3. The applicant has agreed to incorporation of a boardwalk along the shore and overlooking an estuarine wetland west from the dock and residential areas. Ecology and the county will continue to work with the applicants on the specific design of the boardwalk.The design will be agreed upon by those agencies prior to the recording of the final plat and/or issuance of a building permit for structures located within the shoreline boundary;and 4. That the area west of the Marina gangway and east of the marine wetlands,between the boardwalk and the northern edge of buildings,shall be developed as a combination riparian habitat and recreational waterfront. A specific landscape design will be submitted for this area,and approved by the County and by Ecology prior to recording of final plat. 5. The applicant will incorporate interpretive graphics and signage along the boardwalk. The signage will illustrate and describe the marine and historical features of this embaymcnt,the nature of estuarine ecosystems,and habitat values present in the arca. Wetland functions and values will also be depicted. We note that,technically,the new plan involves changes greater than ten(10%)to what was originally approved for Canoe Cove. However,Ecology concurs with Jefferson County that a revised Shoreline Permit should be considered acceptable under the circumstances,based on the doctrine of liberal construction of the Act to effect its purposes. The applicants have agreed to strengthen preservation of native species vegetation on shoreline areas,through covenants,buffer zones,and building setbacks.Further,the plan for Lands End now includes construction of a boardwalk that will protect habitat values while enabling access to wetland areas,increasing public access to Shorelines of Statewide Significance. The Department of Ecology has agreed to assist with the design of the boardwalk and the interpretive signage. Further design discussions are ahead to clarify areas for riparian plantings, the precise delineation of useable open spaces and the placement of interpretive and protective signage, We will also be reviewing the site plans and specific language for restrictive covenants to be incorporated in project development standards. In conclusion,the revised plan for Lands End is one that has demonstrated a responsible approach to the development of these lands.I consider this plan worthy of your support,subject of course to Permit Center approval,and the conditions herein stated. Sincerely, „,,,,,,,,,„,„4...,______ :_ _ _ Jeffree Stewart Shoreline Specialist Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program JS:dj(Landsen.doc) 05/21/98 02:42 4070284 001 FAX NUMBER FAX COVER SHEET Date: ir ( Time: #of Pages: 3 TO: .-Lai ( J ( jea.41 541 ( ._._ FROM: REMARKS: Washington Dept. of Ecology Southwest Regional Office P.O. Box 47775 Olympia, WA 98504-7775 Phone: (360)407-6300 FAX: (360)407-0284 STATE OiiiE1 1888 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY P.O. Box 47775 • Olympia, Washington 98504-7775 • (360) 407-6300 April 20th, 1998 r� j 1998 Jefferson County Commissioners 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Re: Application for Lands End Shoreline Permit Revision Over the course of the past year I have worked on behalf of the Department of Ecology with Jefferson County,making changes as needed to a plan for Lands End, an urban scale development near Port Hadlock. The base plan was prepared by Arca Architecture and Urban Design Corporation and Tillman Engineering. The revised plan,which reflects our negotiations during this period, is meant to replace what was previously known as Canoe Cove and given shorelines approval by the County and the State. This letter acknowledges resolution of several concerns and objectives for the Department of Ecology, relative to Shoreline Management Act policies. Please note,this letter does not necessarily cover every possible issue that could be raised by citizens, nor does it attempt to speak for the Permit Center,which may have separate or additional issues.That said,I believe that this revised design represents a significant improvement to the previously approved plan for Canoe Cove. Accordingly,Ecology wishes to express its support for the plan; subject to the incorporation of those conditions, elements and standards that have been negotiated with the applicant; as follows: 1. In the upland areas along Edgewater Court, east from the dock,building setbacks have been increased, and restrictive covenants will require homeowners to maintain the native vegetation already established there as a riparian buffer zone. The design team has agreed to reconfigure residential footprints such that the buffer zone is not encroached upon, either by the foundation or by decks extending into the fifty-foot riparian zone. When clear need can be demonstrated, some very minor encroachments may be allowed, subject to concurrence by the County and Ecology. 2. It is understood there is no need for armoring the shoreline at the base of these bluffs, and the applicant agrees to preserving a natural appearance and maintaining optimal habitat values of the intertidal area by not allowing bulkheads to be installed here. 0 Jefferson County May 20, 1998 Page 2 3. The applicant has agreed to incorporation of a boardwalk along the shore and overlooking an estuarine wetland west from the dock and residential areas. Ecology and the county will continue to work with the applicants on the specific design of the boardwalk. The design will be agreed upon by those agencies prior to the recording of the final plat and/or issuance of a building permit for structures located within the shoreline boundary; and 4. That the area west of the Marina gangway and east of the marine wetlands,between the boardwalk and the northern edge of buildings, shall be developed as a combination riparian habitat and recreational waterfront. A specific landscape design will be submitted for this area, and approved by the County and by Ecology prior to recording of final plat. 5. The applicant will incorporate interpretive graphics and signage along the boardwalk. The signage will illustrate and describe the marine and historical features of this embayment,the nature of estuarine ecosystems, and habitat values present in the area. Wetland functions and values will also be depicted. We note that,technically,the new plan involves changes greater than ten(10%)to what was originally approved for Canoe Cove. However,Ecology concurs with Jefferson County that a revised Shoreline Permit should be considered acceptable under the circumstances,based on the doctrine of liberal construction of the Act to effect its purposes. The applicants have agreed to strengthen preservation of native species vegetation on shoreline areas,through covenants,buffer zones, and building setbacks. Further,the plan for Lands End now includes construction of a boardwalk that will protect habitat values while enabling access to wetland areas, increasing public access to Shorelines of Statewide Significance. The Department of Ecology has agreed to assist with the design of the boardwalk and the interpretive signage. Further design discussions are ahead to clarify areas for riparian plantings, the precise delineation of useable open spaces and the placement of interpretive and protective signage. We will also be reviewing the site plans and specific language for restrictive covenants to be incorporated in project development standards. In conclusion,the revised plan for Lands End is one that has demonstrated a responsible approach to the development of these lands. I consider this plan worthy of your support, subject of course to Permit Center approval,and the conditions herein stated. Sincerely, Jeffree Stewart Shoreline Specialist Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program JS:dj (Landsen.doc) SDP92-0015 Log Item Date Type 1 note re: house on property G 2 preliminary plat L 3 APO labels G 4 APO list G 5 Canoe Cove legal description G 6 Canoe Cove ownership/maintnenance covenants G 7 project synopsis G 8 water plan approval from City of PT 4/18/85 G 9 wetland report 10/5/92 R 10 Environmental checklist 10/9/92 S 11 application 10/9/92 A 12 notice of application 10/30/92 N 13 application information 10/22/92 G 14 notice of application 11/4/92 N 15 affidavit of publication 11/24/92 N 16 affidavit of posting 11/4/92 N 17 notice of application 11/11/92 N 18 affidavit of publication 11/11/92 N 19 comment from Jeanne L Sisneros 11/16/92 C 20 preliminary plat, full size, revised L 21 affidavit of publication 1/13/93 N 22 comment from E Zahn 2/3/93 C 23 notice of public hearing 2/3/93 N 24 affidavit of publication 2/3/93 N 25 letter to City PT Public Works 2/5/93 G 26 memo/notice of public hearing 2/11/93 N 27 same as log 26 2/11/93 N 28 affidavit of publication 2/17/93 N 29 notice of cancellation of public hearing 2/17/93 N 30 building sketchs and site plans 6/11/93 L 31 preliminary plat 6/11/93 L 32 affidavit of publication 6/25/93 N 33 staff report G 34 letter to hearing examiner from Jefferson County Historical Society 9/7/93 G 35 letter from City Public Works to Rome Ventura 10/12/93 G 36 BOCC findings, conclusions, and approval 10/21/93 G 37 revised conditions from DOE 12/15/93 G 38 Permit 12/17/93 G 39 letter from Land Use Consulting 2/21/95 G 40 letter to Craig Sears 3/6/95 G 41 comments from WDFW 12/28/95 G 42 building code analysis 8/8/97 G 43 staff notes 8/19/97 G 44 staff notes 9/24/97 G 45 fax letter from DOE 10/31/97 G 46 letter from DOE 11/7/97 G 47 copy of section of RCW G Key to Types A=Application C=Comments G=General L=Maps N=Notices R=Reports S=SEPA 1 SDP92-0015 Log Item Date Type 48 staff notes 3/2/98 G 49 letter from Tillman Engineering 3/6/98 G 50 revised shoreline application 3/6/98 A 51 fax to Allan Clarke re: format 3/16/98 G 52 fax to Allan Clarke re:draft findings 4/7/98 G 53 copy of section of WAC 4/24/98 G 54 draft letter from Jeffree 4/24/98 G 55 final report from Arca 4/24/98_G 56 staff notes 4/24/98 G 57 letter to Alan Clark with note re: phone call 5/7/98 G 58 fax to Allan Clark re: shoreline program information 5/8/98 G 59 fax from Alan Clark re: calculating building height 5/8/98 G 60 fax to Alan Clark re: dates 5/14/98 G 61 status of application letter 5/14/98 G 62 fax from Alan Clark re: calculating building height 5/18/98 G 63 fax to Allan Clark re: BOCC agenda 5/20/98 G 64 staff report to BOCC 5/20/98 R 65 letter from DOE to BOCC 5/21/98 G 66 transmittal 5/21/98 G 67 transmittal 5/21/98 G 68 zoning administrator decision 5/21/98 G 69 BOCC agenda 5/26/98 G 70 revised permit 5/26/98 G 71 BOCC decision 5/28/98 G 72 fax transmittal 5/27/98 G 73 transmittal with documents to DOE 5/29/98 G 74 transmittal memo 6/1/98 G 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 Key to Types A=Application C=Comments L=Maps G=General N=Notices R=Reports 2 S=SEPA 0 I 'f n eq STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOG' P.O. Box 47775 • Olvmnia, Washington 98504-7775 • t360) 407-6300 June 8, 1998 r-- iirli fr: ,,3-1 F q 1,,7 -, I — I 11998 A.K. Sharma Port Hadlock KSC LLC Cl `' Tillman cyan lma P.O. Box 1375 Port Hadlock, WA 98339 Dear Mr. Sharma : Re: Permit#SDP 92-0015 Port Hadlock KSC - Applicant Shoreline Revised Conditioned Permit#1998-S W 15134-A The referenced revised Shoreline Permit was received by this office on June 2, 1998. The Department of Ecology has reviewed the above referenced revision to replace plans approved under Canoe Cove, with revised plans labeled Lands End, as described in detailed by Jefferson County in the staff report of May 20, 1998 and related documents . We concur that the revision meets the intent of the Master Program and the criteria set forth in WAC 173-14-064 for granting a revision. The revision is hereby approved. The appeal period for this revision ends on June 17, 1998 . At your own risk, construction may begin during this appeal period provided all other federal, state and local laws regulating such construction have been complied with. We will notify you by letter if this permit is appealed. If you have any questions on the above action, p!ease contact Jeffree Stewart at 360-407-6521. Sincerely,fl-te- 6 Gale Blomstrom Section Supervisor Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program GB:dj cc: Jerry Smith/Jefferson County Permit Center Alan Clark/ARCA LOG ITEM # 0 FILING A PETITION FOR REVIEW WITH THE SHORELINES HEARINGS BOARD To Petition For Review(appeal) a permit decision with the Shorelines Hearings Board (Board) you must comply with the requirements of RCW 90.58.180 and WAC 461-08. The Petition For Review must be received by the Board within twenty one (21) days of the "date of filing" as defined in RCW 90.58.140(6) and WAC 173-27-100(8): The '`date of filing' for •Substantial Development Permits •Revisions to Substantial Development Permits *Locally denied Conditional Use Permits and Variances *Locally denied Revisions to Conditional Use Permits and Variances is the date Ecology received a complete permit submittal. The `date of filing"for *Locally approved Conditional Use Permits and Variances *Locally approved Revisions to Conditional Use Permits and Variances is the date Ecology mailed its decision. The "date of Filing" for *Locally approved Conditional Use Permits or Variances filed concurrently with a Substantial Development Permit is the date Ecology mailed its decision on the Conditional Use and/or Variance. The Petition For Review must contain: (1) The name, mailing address,telephone number and telefacsimile number (if available) of the appealing party, and of the representative, if any; (2) Identification of the parties, by listing in the caption or otherwise. In every case_the agency and/or the local government whose decision is being appealed and the person to whom the decision is directed shall be named as parties; (3)A copy of the application for a shoreline permit which was filed with the local government pursuant to RCW 90.58.140; (4)A copy of the decision or permit appealed from; (5)A short and plain statement showing the grounds upon which the appealing party considers such decision or permit to be unjust or unlawful; (6)A clear and concise statement upon which the appealing party relies to sustain his or her grounds for appeal; (7) The relief sought, including the specific nature and extent; (8)The signature of the representative of tile appealing party or of the appealing party. The signature of the representative or the appealing party shall constitute a certificate by the signatory that the signatory has read the petition and that it is consistent with civil rule 11; (9)All pleadings shall be so construed as to do substantial justice. WHERE TO F!LE A PETITION FOR REVIEW The original and one copy of the Petition For Review must be filed with the Shorelines Hearings Board 4224 6th Avenue SE, Building 2, Rowe Six PO Box 40903 Lacey, WA 98504-0903 Phone: 360-459-6327 Fax: 360-438-7699 One copy of the Petition For Review must be filed with the Department of Ecology and one copy with the Attorney General within seven (7) dad i of filing with the Board: Department of Ecology • Shoreline Appeals Coordinator 300 Desmond Drive, Lacey P O Box 47690 Olympia, WA 98504-7690 Phone: 360-407-6528 FAX: 360-407-6535 Office of the Attorney General Ecology Division 629 Woodland Square Loop SE, Lacey P0Box 40117 Olympia,WA 98504-0117 Phone: 360-459-6320 FAX: 360-438-7743 One copy of the Petition For Review must be filed with the local government whose permit or decision is being appealed; and One copy of the Petition For Review must be filed with the permit applicant. If you have questions please call the Shorelines Hearings Board at 360-459-6327. The Board's FAX number is (360)438-7699. Or, call Ecology's Shorelines Appeals Coordinator at 360-407-6528. or FAX (360)407-6535. Ecology is an Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action Employer. For special accommodation needs,contact the ADA Coordinator at(360)407- 6199. The TDD number is(360)407-6006. frON,o�z JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER �' 04 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 �SBIN GAO June 3, 1998 Architecture and Urban Design Corporation Silver Lake House 11215 Nineteenth Avenue SE Everett,WA 981081 Re: Case Number SDP92-0015 Dear Allan Clark The Board of Commissioners on May 26, 1998 approved your Revised Shoreline Permit. The revised permit and supporting documentation has been mailed to the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE). Construction pursuant to this revised permit may not begin nor is it authorized until twenty-one (21)days from the date of filing with DOE as defined in RCW 90.58.140(5)(6) and WAC 173-14-090, or until all review proceedings initiated within twenty-one (21) days from the date of such filing have terminated,except as provided in RCW 90.58.140 (5a-c). Final Revised Shoreline Permits are issued by the Department of Ecology. You will receive notification from Department of Ecology of the filing date and the date construction may begin. Construction will be subject to obtaining a building permit from Jefferson County, approval of erosion control plans, and approval of stormwater management plans. Construction may also be subject to compliance with conditions of approval. If you have any questions, contact the Permit Center at 360-379-4465. Sincerely, er Jerry Smith Associate Planner Cc:A K Sharma,Applicant, 1207 Brentwood Ave. Richland,WA 98352 File Building Environmental Health Development Review Public Works Building Permits Septic Permits Subdivision, Zoning Road Approach Inspections Water Review & Shoreline Permits Permits & Addresses (360) 379-44 •50 Page 1 FAX: (360) 379-4451 il cz pc — .g i ch 0 _____ a .•w ti) ti? ca,)"- ch c5 0 tn = :60 pi, tu K U ti) — 0 a �; Di( a - 0 v) - *; ' tr : 0.) C:4:ia� a 1:•' UA. / 4u 04 w p / 4 V // et a �' // q C)) 75 0 \ ,i1 4 °V) Cr) I 4.4 ''' gl N / I'l; — .4 0 g t; I Ccii — It - U 71 .� U4 :.. U o : 4, a c t V V / 1fl FIJ �, ° cao 4) 0 - -11:1 4y ei; / `Ii-K cg A clo Pi* 0 To II V C U cg a a "ON'. co w� �� JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER `' 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 141. Memorandum To: Allan Clark From: Jefferson County Permit Center Date: 06/01/98 Re: Revisions to Canoe Cove Development Enclosed is a copy of the Findings, Conclusions,and Decision of the Zoning Administrator and the Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners in the matter of the revisions to the Canoe Cove Development. Please note the expiration date of October 18, 1999. Questions may be referred to Jerry Smith at(360)379-4465. LOG ITEM Building Environmental Health Development Review Public Works Building Permits Septic Permits Subdivision, Zoning Road Approach Inspections Water Review & Shoreline Permits Permits & Addresses (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 (f : ONL v,- 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 '141j G O May 29, 1998 Connie Lambert Department of Ecology, Shorelands Office P 0 Box 47775 Olympia, WA 98504-7775 Subject: Revision to Shoreline Substantial Development Permit SDP92-0015 Port Hadlock KSC LLC Dear Ms. Lambert: Enclosed are the following documents e above rerenced permit Commissioners May 26, 199gision as approved by the Jefferson County Board of 1. Staff Report/Recommendation dated May 20, 1998; 2. Application for Revised Shoreline Development Permit; 3. Detailed drawings; and 4. Cover letter from applicant describing proposed permit revision. Please contact the Jefferson County Permit Center at 360-379-4465 if you have any questions or need further information. Sin erely, -> S r d Jerry Smith Associate Planner Enclosure C: Jeffree Stewart,Department of Ecology Ryan Tillman, Tillman Engineering Allan Clark, Architecture and Urban Design Corporation A K Sharma, Applicant, 1207 Brentwood Ave. Richland, WA 98352 Fly, 6,7 y LOG ITEM Development Review Public Works Building Environmental Health Road Approach '# �77,� "''"'Building Permits Septic Permits Subdivision, Zoning& Shoreline Permits Permits &Addresses Inspections Water Review FAX: (360) 379-4451 (360) 379-4450 May 20, 1998 TO: Jefferson County Board of Commissioners FROM: Jefferson County Permit Center Staff SUBJECT: Revised SDP Request for Lands End, Formerly Canoe Cove STAFF REPORT Introduction: This report evaluates a request to revise Shoreline Substantial Development Permit No. SDP92-0015. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: I. Applicant: AK Sharma, Manager Port Hadlock KSC LLC II. Proposal Description: The revised proposal is a mixed-use development. It consists of detached single-family residential, condominium multi-family residential units, marina services (storage lockers, locker rooms, change and shower facilities, laundry facilities, restroom, care room, and small convenience store) primary restaurant and lounge, health spa/recreation area, swimming pool, facility services, general reception, banquet facilities, secondary lounge, reception center. Construction of a three-level parking garage consisting of 516 parking spaces, access road improvements, and designation of open space are also proposed. III. Location: The existing Port Hadlock Inn and Marina at the old alcohol plant site in Port Hadlock. The site fronts on South Port Townsend Bay. IV. Legal Description: Tax 19, 22, 23, and 24 in Section 1; Tax 21 in Sections 1 and 12; and Tax 23 and 24, Lots 12, Block 7 of Bay View Addition, and Lots 35-40 of Irondale Acre Tracts in Section 12, together with adjoining tidelands, all in Township 29 North, Range 1 West, WM, Jefferson County. V. Shoreline Designation: The shoreline environmental designation is Urban. VI. Zoning: General Use (G-1) VII. Comprehensive Plan Map Designation: Residential, per the Tri-Area Community Development Plan map. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION: I. Hearing Date: The Shoreline Management Advisory Commission held a public hearing June 16, 1993. II. Site Visit: September 24, 1997 III. SEPA: A final modified Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance was issued June 8, 1993. No appeal was filed. IV. Notices: Mailed: June 2, 1993 Posted: June 2, 1993 1 Publication: June 2, 1993 (Port Townsend-Jefferson County Leader). TESTIMONY: Shoreline Commission Public Hearing: The Advisory Commission public hearing was opened on June 16, 1993 in the Jefferson County Courthouse. After the procedures for the public hearing were explained, testimony was accepted. All testimony was taken under oath. A verbatim recording of the public hearing is maintained in the Jefferson County Permit Center file. Jim Pearson, Associate Planner, presented the Staff Report, together with its attachments. Jim Engle, City of Port Townsend Public Works Department, testified concerning the status of the water commitment from the City. Jeanne Sisneros, adjacent property owner, testified that her view would be eliminated by the proposed condominiums and expressed concern about drainage from the site. Jim Pearson gave final staff comment. V. The Shoreline Advisory Commission adopted the Staff Report with the recommended conditions and Conclusions of Law and recommended issuance of the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to the Board of Commissioners. VI. The Board of Commissioners issued Shoreline Substantial Development Permit SDP92-0015 October 18, 1993, subject to conditions. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Application for the original shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SDP92-0015) was made on October 26, 1992 for the construction of a mixed-use residential and commercial development on the site of the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Marina and adjoining property. The proposal included the following: renovation of the west wing of the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Restaurant building (west wing of the old alcohol plant)to create 8 residential artist studio condominiums, a restaurant, and a recreation center with swimming pool; (a) demolition of the east wing of the old alcohol plant building which had previously been converted to a hotel; (b) construction of 44 attached single-family residences; (c) construction of four 21-unit condominiums; (d) construction of roads, utilities, and parking areas with 213 spaces; and (e) Designation of open space. The proposal included an off-site community drainfields south of the Oak Bay County Road. Characteristics of the Site—The site currently contains a resort consisting of a hotel, restaurant, parking lots, and marina. The hotel and restaurant occupy the converted alcohol plant buildings. These are concrete structures that were built in 1911 to produce alcohol from sawdust. The proposed site is a portion of the Lower Hadlock Bay Historic Site. It is on the State Register of Historic Sites. 2 • 2. Subsequent to issuance of the original substantial shoreline development permit, the proponent received approval (permit number SDP95-0008) to modify the existing breakwater and construct an addition to the existing marina. 3. Substantial progress has been made in developing the single-family residential portion of the proposal. The plat of Villas by the Sea was approved and recorded in November 1996. The modification to the existing breakwater and addition to the existing marina have been constructed. 4. On May 8, 1997, the applicant submitted detailed plans and text describing the proposed changes in the permit, to the Permit Center. An application to revise the shoreline substantial development permit was submitted to the Permit Center March 6, 1998. 5. The Shoreline designation is Urban. 6. The Zoning designation is General Use (G-1). 7. The Comprehensive Plan designation is Residential. 8. Characteristics of the Area— The adjoining area to the south is platted in urban densities, however, there are only four residences immediately adjoining the proposed site. The area to the east is platted and developed in urban and suburban densities with small lots adjoining the shoreline. The area to the west is not platted. 9. Jefferson County Permit Center staff conducted a site inspection on September 24, 1997. Jeffree Stewart (shoreline specialist), Ann Boeholt (wetland specialist and Mark Benley(wetland specialist) of the State Department of Ecology were present. Al Scalf (Community Development Director) and Jerry Smith (Project Planner) were present at the September 24, 1997 site inspection. 10. A wetland located approximately 110 feet southerly of the ordinary high water mark was noted. 11. On October 31, 1997, Jefferson County received a letter from the State Department of Ecology. The letter stated that the key language in determining if the proposed revision is consistent with the scope and intent of the earlier permitted design is in WAC 173-27- 100 (1). This code rule states:If the local government determines that the proposed changes are within the scope and intent of the original permit, and are consistent with the applicable master program and the act, local government may approve a revision. 12. The Department of Ecology, in a draft letter dated April 23, 1998, stated their support for the revised Lands End plan. DOE indicated that"we are coming close to an acceptable modified design for Canoe Cove." REVIEW CRITERIA Revisions to Shoreline Substantial Development Permits are evaluated in terms of the criteria specified in the respective ordinance(s). The following ordinance provisions are applicable: 1. The Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program, Section 4.105, Urban, and states: The urban environment is an area of high intensity land use, including residential, commercial and industrial development. Urban shorelines should be designated for high intensity use or multi family residential development. The urban designation may also be applied to areas of lower intensity use where the surrounding land use is urban and urban services are available." 3 2. The Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program, Section 6.404, Revisions, states: When Jefferson County receives application to revise a shoreline permit previously granted, they shall determine if he desired modifications are "major and significant. "If the modifications are determined as major and significant, a new and complete application shall be processed in compliance with this section. In the proposed modifications are determined as not being major and significant, the Board shall review and thereafter approve or deny the request for permit revision. When a permittee seeks to revise a permit, the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department shall request from the permittee detailed plans and text describing the proposed changes in the permit. If Jefferson County determines that the proposed changes are within the scope and intent of the original permit, they may approve a revision. "Within the scope and intent of the original permit"means all of the following: 1. No additional over-water construction is involved, except that pier, dock, or float construction may be increased by 500 square feet or 10 percent from the provisions of the original permit, whichever is less. 2. Ground area coverage and height of each structure may be increased a maximum of 10 percent from the provisions of the original permit. 3. Additional separate structures may not exceed a total of 250 square feet. 4. The revised permit does not exceed height, lot coverage, setback, or any of the requirements of this Master Program except as authorized under the original permit. 5. Additional landscaping is consistent with conditions (if any) attached to the original permit and with this Master Program. 6. The use authorized pursuant to the original permit is not changed. 7. No substantial adverse environmental impact will be caused by the proposed revision. If the sum of the revision and any previously approved revisions violate the provisions above, the county shall require that the permittee apply for a new permit in the manner provided in this Master Program. 3. Section 2.15.01.026 of the Jefferson County Regulatory Reform Ordinance (hereafter JCRRO) states that: "a change by an applicant... of a proposed project may be determined by the Director"as minor[or]major". CONCLUSIONS 1. Based on the listed findings, the modified project does not require a new Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, as only minor changes are being proposed. 2. Because the changes are substantive in effect, since the original permit was issued, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Revision is needed prior to approval of building or septic permit(s). 4 3. In relationship to review criteria of the Jefferson County Regulatory Reform Ordinance, the Director of Community Development has determined that the proposed project is minor in nature and therefore does not require a new review process. 4. DOE concurs with Jefferson County that a revised shoreline permit should be considered acceptable under the circumstances. Their concurrence is because the applicants are agreeing to strengthen preservation of native species through covenants for buffer zones, and because the modified proposal includes construction of a boardwalk simultaneously protecting and enabling view access to wetland areas. DOE determination, which is supported by the Shoreline Administrator, is under the terms of liberal construction to effect the purposes of the law. 5. The applicant has prepared detailed plans and text, which adequately describes the proposed changes. 6. The detailed plans and text document that no additional over water construction is involved in the proposed permit revision. 7. Ground area coverage is no greater than that permitted in the original permit. Documents accompanying the revised detailed plans verify that less ground cover will occur when compared with the original permit. 8. Height of three (3) of the five (5) principle buildings approved in the Canoe Cove plan were located at a point that represents the highest geodetic elevation of the subject site. These three buildings are also fifty (50) feet in height. Site profiles within the revised detailed plans and text describing the proposed changes illustrate the following: (a) the top floor of these structures, as relocated in the plan for Lands End, are at a point roughly equivalent to the ground floor of the highest Canoe Cove buildings in their location south of Alcohol Loop Road, (b) building height as determined by shoreline standards, will be lower by six (6) feet, and (c) additional protection for shoreline buffer zones and protection of wetland areas. 9. Landscaping has been greatly enhanced and will be expanded to the west. For example, provisions for the westward expansion of the riparian bluff vegetation toward the Terraced Garden (cultivated native growth and Rhododendron species) and Reflecting Fountain Pool have been added. 10. The proposed uses are essentially unchanged. 11. Preservation of natural features such as an existing wetland and bluff vegetation will be incorporated into the revised proposal. Less impervious surface will result. Impacts to the environment will be lessened with approval of the revised plan and permit. 12. The proposed revision, properly conditioned, will be within the scope and intent of the original permit and will be consistent with the applicable provisions of the Shoreline Management Master Program. 13. Based on the above Findings and the Board of Commissioners adopted Findings and Conclusions of the original permit, the criteria for the Revision to the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit have been met. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 5 0 Based on the Findings and Conclusions above, the application to revise Shoreline Substantial Development Permit No. SDP92-0015 is recommended for approval, subject to the following recommended conditions: 1. The conditions listed in the original shoreline substantial development permit issued October 18, 1993. 2. The SEPA mitigation measures of the Final Modified Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance issued June 8, 1993. 3. Prior to construction, the applicant shall prepare final covenants to protect native plant species within the buffer zones. The covenants shall be reviewed and approved prior to construction. 4. The applicant shall construct a boardwalk of timber and stone for simultaneous protection and view access to wetland areas. The boardwalk design will feature `nodes of interest' that will provide interpretative graphics and language to explain the ecological characteristics of the tidal lands, the riparian wetlands and the marine estuaries. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit design plans to the County for State Department of Ecology review and approval. The plans shall include interpretive signage regarding wetland functions and values. 5. The applicant shall continue design discussions regarding clarifying areas for riparian plantings relative to open space and recreational areas. These designs will illustrate the waterfront north of the main structures near the beach. The design for riparian plantings shall be reviewed and approved before commencement of planting. 6. The applicant shall prepare a plan for the placement of discrete, durable signage in the buffer zone areas that will serve as physical reminders of the restrictions on disruption to shoreline vegetation. 7. The shoreline area shall be developed in accordance with the approved Shoreline and Landscaping Plan. The riparian bluff lands that separate the Villas by the Sea from the tidal beach will be protected as much as possible. 8. The placement of structures on the remaining Villas by the Sea bluff lots will be restricted such that the southerly line of vegetation will be the setback line for structures, including decks, wherever reasonably possible. 9. The Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions for the plat of Villas by the Sea shall be amended to incorporate the above setback restriction. 10. To facilitate implementation of the approved revised plan, the applicant shall make application to Jefferson County for the vacation of lots 1 through 5 and lot 25 of the Plat of Villas by the Sea. 11. Prior to final approval, the applicant shall prepare a final site plan that is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 18.40.050 of the Jefferson County Code. The final site plan shall be formatted in such a manner that upon its recording it will be a binding site plan with sufficient detail to give effect to the plan as submitted. 12. Provisions of the Shoreline Plan developed in conjunction with the revision of SDP92-0015 shall be an integral part of and conditioning for future shoreline permitting related to Lands End. Dated this 20th day of May, 1998 6 JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER 621 SHERIDAN ST., PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 MA _ 6 1998 (360) 379-4450 1-800-831-2678 REVISED SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION NO. SDP92 - 0015 Also file numbers LP-08-92 , IZ-46-93 The Washington State Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58) requires that revisions to permitted substantial developments within designated shorelines of the State comply with its administrative procedures (WAC 173-14- 064) and the provisions of the Jefferson County-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program. Please answer the following questions completely. Print in ink or type. APPLICANT: A. K. Sharma , Manager Port Hadlock KSC LLC ADDRESS: 1207 Brentwood Ave . Richland, WA 99352 TELEPHONE: (home) -- (business) -- REPRESENTATIVE/CONTACT PERSON: Tillman Engineering, Inc . / ARCA P .O. Box 1375 / 11215 - 19th Ave . SE ADDRESS: Port Hadlock WA 98339 Everett , WA 98208 ( 360 ) 379-9661 ( 425 ) 743-1500 TELEPHONE: (l bN ) ( 360 ) 379-0150 fax (flXi101 ice) ( 425 ) 337-4180 fax DIRECTIONS 1. Answer all questions completely. Contact the Jefferson County Development Review Division for aid in filling out this application and for instructions on further administrative procedures required to complete processing. 2. Attach any additional information (reports, studies, maps, illustrations, leases, permits, etc.) that may further describe the proposed revision or be required by Jefferson County, in addition to the revised development plan. 3. Check with appropriate departments to determine if the proposed revision requires additional permits or approvals. A revision permit issued under the Jefferson County-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program will not excuse a permittee from compliance with other local,'state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statues applicable to the proposed revision. REVISED DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION PROPERTY (identify changes in the description of the property as described in the original application, including the legal, ownership, and natural and cultural features): Request for Shorelines Minor Amendment submitted to Jefferson County Permit Center on May 8 , 1997 . Please see May 8 , 1997 packet for complete description of requested revisions to site plan. REVISED DEVELOPMENT (identify and describe the proposed revision, including the type of materials to be used, construction methods, principal dimensions, and other pertinent information): Request for minor amendment submitted May 8 , 1997 . See May 8 , 1997 submittal packet for complete description of requested revisions to site . USE (commercial, residential, recreational, etc.): A mixed use res ident ial/commercial/recreationa] development on the site of the existing Old Alcohol Plant Lodge and Marina . ESTIMATED COST/FAIR MARKET VALUE: greater than COMPLETION DATE: -- $2 , 500 Fair Market Value REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN Using the original development plan, illustrate and identify the proposed revision to the permitted development. ACKNOWLEDGMENT I hereby declare, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the foregoing information and all attached information is true and correc . . 3/47? 8' (authorized signature) (date) :1l(O .00 Application Fee $1-00:00. For'OfficeUse Only Receipf No Cas (heck No Z3 l=ee E Date: ) -‘Q' 2S Initials: ' h:\home\pincnti infopInp\shorrev.doc TILLMAN KIVLEY PROFESSIONAL CENTER 141 OAK BAY ROAD/P.O. BOX 1375 ENG�NEER�IVG INC. PORT HADLOCK,WASHINGTON 98339 �Y V Il X11 V/ 360-379-9661 360-379-0150 FAX RECEIVED _ 6 1998 J.C. PERMIT CENTER March 6, 1998 Jerry Smith, Assistant Planner Jefferson County Permit Center 621 Sheridan St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 RE: APPLICATION FORM-FILE#SDP92-0015 Dear Mr. Smith, Based on a conversation of March 4, 1998, Jefferson County has now requested an application form and $110 administrative fee be submitted in conjunction with the request for Minor Amendment of File# SDP92-0015, "Canoe Cove." The request for Minor Amendment("Land's End")was received by Jefferson County May 8, 1997. Enclosed find the completed application form and administrative fee. The applicant continues to consider the receipt date of May 8, 1997 as the date of complete application for this request. Sincerely, - Debbie Randall r , 044 11 aig Ar April 24, 1996 Jefferson County Permit Center 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,Washington 98368 Att: Mr.Al Scalf Director Community Development Mr.Jerry Smith Associate Planner Ref: Application for Minor Revision Lands End ...where adventure begins LP08-92,IZ46-93, SDP92-00I5 Gentlemen; Further to our many discussions regarding the characteristics that define the Master Plan for Lands End, we forward herewith our final report. This information presented herein is to be appended to the Lands End Project Profile (11.5 x 17)and the Canoe Cove Appendix that were submitted with the original application in May 1997. As we hope you will agree, the plan for Lands End is one that seeks to improve on all aspects of the original plan filed in 1992 as Canoe Cove. As you are aware, we have had an ongoing dialogue with the Department of Ecology for the State of Washington and are pleased to attach the department's letter of support for the revisions proposed. This support is conditioned upon certain aspects of the plan being incorporated as an integral part of the plan at recording of final plat. As a preface to the application, it is fair to say that there is general consensus that the plan for Lands End constitutes a"net"advantage to the community in very many respects, not the least of which is its consideration for the immediate environmental context, in the broadest sense, and its consideration for the aesthetic and architectural improvement to the site. Where the differences to the Canoe Cove plan appear to present the greatest departure from such approved plan, and therefore suggest that perhaps it is not really a minor revision, requires your most careful consideration. It is these very differences that constitute the greatest benefit. RCiIITl- (' TtRE & RBA: \ DESICN C� DIPOR _k ioN Silver Lake House 11215 Nmetrenth Arcnue SE E\-c:rett. tvashsngion ',S2t)S Iel (20o) ".41-15(.0 t.,v. # .,.(), LOG J 1 E980424 .ti Jefferson County 98.04.24 Page 2 A case in point is the relocation of three Canoe Cove buildings from the highest elevation of the property to the lowest elevation where the Canoe Cove plan provided for open space. Unfortunately, the Canoe Cove plan made no provision for the Marina and its attendant parking and servicing; an existing element which has also been the subject of at least two(2) Shoreline Permits. Is it not therefore fair to say that the so called open space of the Canoe Cove Plan,with its open parking lot for Marina patrons only, can best be characterized as simply "residual" space, not having been either contemplated or articulated as "useable"open space? This area was the subject of much discussion with the Department of Ecology, and, their support for the plan for Lands End is predicated largely on the opportunity the "revisions" present for improvement to the riparian and marine values that are critical to the inherent and natural values associated with this land. Attached hereto is a Shoreline Plan that has been developed in concert with Jeffree Stewart of the Department of Ecology. It has been agreed that the riparian bluff lands that separate the Villas by the Sea from the tidal beach be protected as much as possible. Accordingly the placement of structures on the remaining bluff lots will be further restricted than previously approved such that the southerly line of vegetation be the setback line for structures including decks, wherever reasonably possible. The CC&R's for the Villas by the Sea Plat will be so amended to accomplish this objective and condition of approval. The Shoreline Plan also makes provision for the westward extension of the riparian bluff vegetation toward the Terraced Garden (cultivated native growth and Rhododendron species)and Reflecting Fountain Pool indicated in the plan for Lands End. Lots One (1)through Five(5) and Lot Twenty Five (25)will be vacated to facilitate the implementation of the plan for Lands End. West of the Marina gangway a Seaside Park will be developed so as to provide both passive and active recreation areas. The tidal beach will be separated from the cultivated lands by a Boardwalk to be constructed of timber and stone. The Boardwalk design will feature "nodes of interest"that will provide interpretive graphics and language to explain the ecological characteristics of the tidal lands,the riparian wetlands and the marine estuaries. These nodes of interest will also provide places to sit and look at the marine environment. Marine habitat will also be featured. The historical profile of the lands will document the use of the lands by the native peoples, most notably, the Tsetsibus. The development of the site for the manufacturing of wood alcohol at the turn of the century will be a featured interpretive are within the complex. Care will be taken to ensure that the "view corridors" shown on the plan are not compromised. LE-JC980424 Jefferson County 98.04.24 Page 3 We have recently revisited the landscape plan for the Villas by the Sea plat and have amended same with your approval. This amendment also constitutes a significant improvement to the plat and one that must also be incorporated into the CC&R's for the Villas by the Sea, as a condition of approval. A matrix for comparison that was a part of the Lands End Project Profile is summarized as follows: Lands End Canoe Cove Land Area 23.5 Acres 23.5 Acres Impervious Cover 234,212 SF 243,020 SF Total Residential Units 141 141 Single Detached Villas 18 1 Multiple Dwelling Buildings 4 21 Total Parking Provided 516 Spaces 162 Spaces Open Parking 115 Spaces 117 Spaces Covered Parking 401 Spaces 45 Spaces Parking Variance No Yes Vehicular Circulation Yes No Marina Integration Yes No Marina Slips 154 NIC Marina Parking 125 Spaces None Marina Services Covered Open Specific Services Provision Yes No Building Count 24 25 Buildings South of ALR None 3 LE-JC980424 Jefferson County 98.04.24 Page 4 Building Code Compliance Yes No Parking Spaces South of ALR None 70 Maximum Building Height 70 Feet 60 Feet Existing Building Height 70 Feet 70 Feet Maximum Geodetic Height 110 Feet 130 Feet Existing Geodetic Height 90 Feet 110 Feet Articulated Open Space Yes No Boardwalk Yes No Environmental Graphics Yes No Wetland Enhancement Yes No Project Landscaping Yes No SeaSide Park Yes No Development in SF Zone No Yes View Corridors Yes No Setback Variances None Several Landscape Covenants Yes None Building Materials Masonry/Cement Plaster Not Identified Pedestrian Corridors Two Primary None Pedestrian Dominant Zones Yes No Land Use Zoning Yes No Activity Zoning Yes No Comprehensive Planning Yes No Approach Vistas Yes No LE-JC980424 Jefferson County 98.04 24 Page 5 For convenience,the following excerpta is provided here from the Lands End Project Profile: To establish a context for the evaluation of the plan for Lands End, the approved Canoe Cove plan must be analyzed. The Canoe Cove plan is, by reference to project documentation, a preliminary plan. It is apparent that much was yet to be resolved in order to truly define the characteristics of the project..Accordingly, it is reasonable to expect a certain degree of change as the project moves through the permitting processes which interface the original plan with the changes that have been made to County ordinances; as well as to the Uniform Building Code. Our analysis of the approved plan for Canoe Cove is presented so as to provide a basis for comparison and determination of net benefit. To be fair to the plan for Canoe Cove, it must be recognized that it is a preliminary plan and that it did not try to be more than that. Our comments are not therefore to be construed as a criticism of the plan but a means of defining the principal characteristics that constitute the plan; summarized as follows: • The Canoe Cove plan provides for a total of twenty five (25)buildings widely dispersed throughout the site. Six(6) of the twenty five(25)are"principal"buildings, the balance being composed of buildings which range from two(2)to five(5)attached residential units. • Three (3)of the five(5)principal buildings are located south of Alcohol Loop Road(ALR) at a point that represents the highest geodetic elevation of the site. These three buildings are also fifty(50) feet in height. You will note from the site profiles provided herein that the top floor of these structures, as relocated in the plan for Lands End, are at a point roughly equivalent to the ground floor of the highest Canoe Cove buildings in their location south of ALR. • The three(3) buildings identified as Building Type E on the Canoe Cove plan are located adjacent to lands that are zoned for single family residences. For some reason, the plan sought and was granted yard variances to make the buildings fit into the "slot"of land south of Alcohol Loop Road. • The west wing of the Old Alcohol Plant,the largest mass on the site, was to be retained. Pursuant to the plan it was to accommodate residential units in addition to the banquet, meeting room, lounge and restaurant facilities that it provides today. The building also houses a pari-mutuel gaming lounge on the mezzanine level. The building is approximately 60 feet in height at its highest point and utilized an in-situ concrete post and beam system that today is in a rather poor physical state. Constructed in 1911 as a wood alcohol manufacturing facility, the building does not have sufficient structural integrity or seismic capacity to justify its continuing existence. Moreover, the building is largely unused and does not comply with current codes. It is the opinion of the architect that a conversion of LE-JC980424 Jefferson County 98.04.24 Page 6 this mass to a more efficient and aesthetically attractive space would better serve the project as well as the interests of the community. • A factor of great importance that is not sufficiently addressed on the plan for Canoe Cove is that of parking. It appears that the parking provided for the smaller attached residential units is adequate because of individual garages and driveways, however, the parking provided for the larger condominium and commercial components is not only inadequate but difficult to access. The largest parking component for the project is once again located adjacent the adjoining lands that are zoned for single family residences. As the parking area so designed is accessed from only one point,the headlights, noise and the general intrusion of a large parking area in one's backyard is inescapable. • Parking for the restaurant, recreation and health club in the Canoe Cove plan appears to be a total of only nineteen (19) spaces. The plan shows parking spaces directly off Alcohol Loop Road. Such a condition of parking directly off a thoroughfare would suggest that one may park anywhere. • The parking ratio for the larger condominium residences on the plan is very close to a 1:1 ratio. Current market criteria requires a minimum of 1.5:1. • The servicing and parking requirements for the Marina are not indicated. • Traffic circulation for the Canoe Cove plan is lacking because there is no indication as to where one should in fact be going, a fact which is exacerbated because there is likely to be no parking space found when one gets there. • The plan for Canoe Cove does not address the servicing needs of the project. Guest parking, refuse containers, loading zones and such are very much a reality and must be located and designed to ensure proper use while mitigating any negative impacts that may arise as a function of their intended use. • Because of the dispersed nature of the project components coupled with a lack of parking there is ample opportunity for conflict and a lack of control. • The plan does not, to a large extent, recognize the different needs and interests of the site residents versus those of the more transient boaters and commercial patrons. • The open space considerations of the Canoe Cove plan appear to be more a function of what is"left over"as opposed to a networked delineation and articulation of"usable"open space. An overlay of the parking and loading facilities for the marina as well as the boat launch area very much changes what otherwise might be the open space character perceived from the plan. LE-JC980424 Jefferson County 98.04.24 Page 7 • Due most likely to the preliminary nature of the plan, water quality and stormwater issues are not addressed. In conclusion, the plan for Canoe Cove can be characterized by a general lack of plan organization, land use zoning within the site, activity zoning, building orientation and linkage for both pedestrian and automobile within the project. The net result would appear to be a project that, perhaps even to its proponents, falls far short of its intended objective. It is therefore much less than it could otherwise be. A summary comparative analysis of the foregoing characteristics of Canoe Cove with that of Lands End is provided in the lands End Project Profile under the tab"Comparative Analysis". The approach to crafting a plan for Lands End requires a recognition and careful analysis of the many facets that create this beautiful site. What we see as particularly relevant is how we can improve on the Canoe Cove plan for the benefit of the project and the benefit of the community it serves. The project will, after all, have a life span of at least one hundred years. Our challenge has been to work within the parameters of the existing approved plan and to the provisions of Ordinance No. 08-0408-96 entitled "Optional Consolidated Permit Review Process". The plan also recognizes the Villas by the Sea plat recorded in 1997. The project plan for Lands End is illustrated under the tab "Site Plan Lands End"and can be expressed as follows: • The primary form determinant for the plan of Lands End is the natural land form itself. The land slopes downward to the shoreline in both the northerly and westerly direction thereby affording the opportunity to locate and stack the parking requirements for almost all the project components in a very confined and central area. • Taking this approach then allows the clustering of the principal project components around the parking and service areas, much of which are now covered. The land form is employed to provide varying points of access(along Oak Street/ALR)to the parking areas in a manner that eliminates the need for any internal ramps. • The parking areas are naturally illuminated by the terracing effect on the east elevation and by the openings to Port Townsend Bay on the north elevation. • Access to the Marina is highly controlled and the boat launch is eliminated. This condition enables the creation of a"pedestrian dominant zone" in the shoreline area that is otherwise overtaken by the activities and parking of Marina patrons. LE-JC980424 Jefferson County 98.04.24 Page 8 • Marina parking as well as Marina Services are located on the Level 14 and Level 24 of the Project Plan. Marina services include storage lockers, locker rooms, change and shower facilities, laundry facilities, restrooms, care room, and small convenience store. • Project services are located on Level 36, a level that has a floor to floor height of sixteen feet; thereby allowing entry of essentially all service vehicles including garbage disposal trucks and delivery vans. • The interface between the parking areas and the habitable spaces is a highly articulated Pedestrian Spine on the east/west axis that provides linkage throughout the project while simultaneously creating a strong and positive outdoor open space experience. The pedestrian spine also provides a means of transition between the various project levels emanating from the land form and facilitates access to vertical circulation systems. This corridor is a strong point of interest throughout the project, providing a"path" and place of meeting for the project population. • Also of note is the placement of the buildings such that view corridors are opened to and from the Shorelines, the Marina, and Port Townsend Bay. Building cost criteria would suggest the consolidation of the three small "Bayview"buildings into one larger building; but then we would lose much of the interface with the shoreline if this cost approach were adopted. • The largest mass within the plan for Lands End is the Mansion at Lands End, located in the same position as the east wing of the existing complex. The Mansion begins at Level 36 and extends through to the"dormered"roof spaces on Level 96. An east/west oriented wing has been added to consolidate project density. • It is interesting to note that this point of highest density on the site is adjacent and across from lands which are a part of this application.. Suffice to say, any impact of this particular building is largely mitigated by its location. View corridors are now open from all lands to the south. • One approaches the project from both Charles Street and George Street and by reference to the plan one can see that these"approach vistas"are particularly long. The approach to the Mansion along George Street culminates in a landscaped plaza that serves as a reception and drop-off area. • The Reception Center which is essentially replacing the banquet and meeting facilities of the existing building is located adjacent the Mansion in a manner that allows for the pick up and drop-off of persons that may be attending a wedding or Port Hadlock Rotary Meeting, separate from the traffic using the central plaza. LE-JC980424 Jefferson County 98.04.24 Page 9 • Located on Level 36 is the Health Club &Spa as well as the principal building services for the complex as a whole. • The Pavilion Lands End is situated over the Marina Services area and is the intended location for a primary restaurant and lounge. Such building is located along the pedestrian spine to provide easy access from the project parking areas, the Shorelines,the Lands End community, and the Port Hadlock community at large. • Because the principal building components are clustered around the servicing and circulation infrastructure for the project; such servicing areas and parking access is significantly more efficient. Impervious cover is greatly reduced with a corresponding reduction in the environmental impact normally associated with service and parking areas. Calculations setting out the differences between Canoe Cove and Lands End are provided. The increase in parking spaces provided in the Lands End plan notwithstanding, impervious cover areas are considerably less for the lands end project. • The largest structures are located furthest from the single family zoned lands and because of the land form and the variable grade elevation, said structures appear much lower from the single family zoned lands. • It follows that the views from such lands are also much less impeded. • The open space network for Lands End is intended to be a means of linking the various elements of the project, both natural and man-made. • Architectural sketches are provided to illustrate the intended architectural character of the project. The placement of buildings and contextual elements such as the pedestrian spine and landscaped gardens are collectively a choreography of form, color and texture that constitute an architecture that is appropriate for this extraordinary site. • As demonstrated by the Villa San Juan(now constructed), split-face and saw-cut limestone is a primary building component. The lower levels of the project will use a heavier textured limestone at a scale that will provide the desired effect ... that the buildings look like they belong and have "perhaps"been there a long time. The plan for Lands End.. where adventure begins has made a sincere effort to become an asset to its host community. LE-JC980424 Jefferson County 98.04.24 Page 10 For conditions of approval which are to be addressed at the time of the recording of the final plat to the satisfaction of the Director,we wish to suggest the following: 1. That the Plan for Lands End be a binding site plan, and 2. That the documents entered for the recording of the final plat be sufficiently detailed so as to give effect to the plan as submitted, and 3. That the amendments and further provisions of the revised landscape plan for the Villas by the Sea plat be recorded in the CC&R's for the Villas by the Sea plat, and 4. That the provisions contained within the Shoreline Plan that has been developed in concert with the Department of Ecology be further developed and form an integral part and condition to the issuance of Shoreline Permits in the future. As we are also seeking a renewal or extension to the existing Shoreline Permit, the provisions of the Shoreline Plan are to be incorporated as a condition of approval. In our discussions and evaluations we have been mindful of the principal titters by which this application for a Minor Revision is to be judged. We wish to address these four basic points set out in the Optional Consolidated Review Process, Ordinance No. 08-0408-96, Jefferson County; as follows: 1. Change to proposed land use: The plan for Lands End, contains no land uses that were not contained in the original approval for the Canoe Cove application. even as already amended by the Villas by the Sea plat 2. Substantially greater floor area or number of residential units: The plan for Lands End provides for no greater habitable floor area than that contained in the approved Canoe Cove plan and further, provides only for the same 141 residential units approved for Canoe Cove, even as already amended by the Villas by the Sea plat. 3. Substantial relocation of uses or structures: The plan for Lands End is partly in response to the Villas by the Sea plat which of itself greatly amended the Canoe Cove plan. To achieve the approved and remaining residential density the plan consolidated the project into a more compact area around a service and parking core that greatly reduced the impact on both environment and adjacent residential properties. Such impacts would have been considerable if the Canoe Cove plan would have been implemented. For greater certainty, use locations within the plan for Lands End have not changed, however, minor changes have occurred in the site specific densities to give effect to the many improvements that the plan now provides. We believe it fair to say that the word"substantial"must be interpreted within the context of the plan. For the most part, all development within the plan for Lands End represents a consolidation and a"shrinking"away from the adjacent lands owned by others. LE-JC980424 • Jefferson County 98.04.24 Page 11 4. Change that would probably result in significantly d fferent impacts to the environment, upon public services or facilities, or to neighboring properties or land uses: There is no question that the plan for Lands End constitutes significant change of the impact of the project on the environment, the public good, neighboring properties and neighboring land uses. These changes are significant indeed and extremely positive in every respect. For all of the reasons contained within this submittal the plan for Lands End is a plan that is worthy of your favorable consideration and support. Arca and Tillman Engineering have enjoyed the deliberations and discussions that have culminated in the preparation of this application. We have appreciated the assistance and cooperation that has been afforded by you and your staff. Thank you for your attention herein. Si cerely, Tillman Engineering it-cture & Urban Design Corporation Alan B. Clark AIA Ryan Tillman P.Eng. Principal Principal LE-JC980424 !" iA L 'IT - ..• . Y COIlikis-AN' , .. . . I za -5 '...) • •. . -;*‘: ':,•-• -•....-2. -• . ., • '- . * • . CD D l; _ lit; . '. .- l; --.-!- . . ', . • ,� D ..a)..,..: ,.....•• - • "3 rn rn m a z ___ 9H 70 a o a • a z ••. Z N Da O _ aZ QZ C) prnp � � � r,• '"D 3-:.::,,:. -. . ... � rn 4 rnp pD zNn Cz p Nzo rnGSR° = Z olit..--.....:.,. . • , • . • m NOD :. . o --i 73 73 , ' rnrn S �, N 70 zo z rn D -< 1, 7� Z 7- 11111/1 Z3 . . '-% • Z 1 \. : • • l 4-..1 1 . "s= 1 • -- - ".--;.%.,-.-:-,,....,,-......-; ---, .,,,,;.........„ ••11'. ,... . .-1, / � ' 70 t x NCS ,_a- \\ > ‘'- -- • - - \ -: - _ . - -• .,.,:.,._14... .. -,-,,,v,t_L-, •.--- .., -.. -- - - : -- �' •-- zo r_ '...,' 1 �' mcD - -''-', .: •.' • -iiktV.:"...A-..-%.....-5,- 1-..--, L.; .. - _ .:. \ . "r...1 .-.. • . , , • . ".. ri ''''''..t.A.°°°. L \ ..---.11.1 i f q •� .--....r• r!.....--....r` I c,,.:1 _. ....),•-• • cc‘ .,/* k..it,- 4.-.:. '.-!-.1-:4,-;;;;)--- .".1t---‘ "...;-.1„:' .. .• .. .• QRZ • -00.P. �• ..,...-.7....-...z.L'" Z.., 4 41W:H" --.. - . .44' . -ics,_,A ,--:- --.5... - \414''.-..--*/-41.4- --i•-t,\\ ,, • • 4 \ 1 - )3\ �� .:. . . .• iiiik.......„.,.6...,x,_:.:_.„,..31.•_,;„\„.i.._ .v... .t., _. _:::,:. .. \ ia� I \ • x\ .... • .., 020Z> > a • _ .....7.„..._..... \. _ .. :1 ',f. ,.,...,..„,..:-;:;.,...?-_,... • ......4% -.:-. y c-,=.: "Z s M� _•., n �'��� • �..• ••.moi-�cv�r�.,��h, •w�.� • �, I^I •��q.- ""mow• �am . ���a• �.�i. • ,. y o m 7-+� -. .'.,'14.%-t--',- � '\ $fea `�...-yx`+s :U,. rt�- ...,....7•7,-..V.-;•-/.' 4.i".•'--.'-'47';-:-: � ' '�� �q _ bN. .-. q . - ce 7 T"::-..-A.::' S?:7%-:-,:t.„- t'',.. ,,.4-4..,:-&.4v-. :. : . `{� ..11 T.1.1- ,.....-4• 7' g :? i' i N4 a fir- "-f .i.., : ?1,.....1..-_ .�Y $`� �,- n :: --Tx., s '� .':,q- `R "`4:7. - :• ' N,'C' r!�•-yam"3g lrh•''y.' '$-Y .a. a - - ,V Ss -' €V' .- t•'..4-01:,*,:.., '�.�.• • c.-,F ,F 1. I-14 - .. iN, !! - z r (s) j-- C� 0 a > 0 Z O z a QP I rfl .. ... . • • - • • Z • • • • . • • ... - ' . ,q:.-....., i....'''':-.'4''AketigLi • • • •• $YK 14r wa .ems L.iv. eek, 4. 3 XYZ' Z. -11-•••-s-L ..y,, _ F. A.'Y y. . =tel. E• r _s • _ - I �.EC ti3�Fj . 4. isii*joir.o. o z '1 m 73 7 cm H70 • Ka D mrri'" i - _ o'er: • Rt N D 714 � c> � G� ?0 —9i .r< U) N „r' .'r.FS� CO', A - i i 0 i - ' � 725 v.eL .4.'s t•••� ''YID^' \,y;+A err 1 { `p J S t r " April30, 1997 Jefferson County Permit Center 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, Washington 98368 Alt Mr.Al Scalf Director of Community Development Ref: Minor Revision Canoe Cove Approval LP08-92, IZ46-93, SDP92-00 I 5 Dear Mr. Scalf; We are pleased to forward herewith our application for a Minor Revision to the approvals provided the Canoe Cove application in October of 1993. This application has been prepared by Arca in collaboration with Tillman Engineering. To assist you and your staff in the evaluation of this application we have collected all of the original documentation available to us and have placed same in a separate binder entitled "Canoe Cove Appendix", (hereinafter referred to as the CCA). Al documentation therein is indexed and tabbed for added convenience. The CCA is included in this submission. 1Whereas all references to the original approved plan use the name "Canoe Cove", all references to the plan as proposed herein reference same as "Lands End". The full name of the project is "Lands End ... where adventure begins." Al graphic illustrations presented in this document are numbered for reference 1 in the Table of Contents. Pursuant to Tab/of the CCA, the application for Canoe Cove by Alexander&Ventura was approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October 18, 1993. The essence of the application, as approved, contemplated a mixed use residential and commercial development. More specifically, 'ry(/' liii nt. + IR MAY 8 4dSONCOUNTY PER ER • approval was given for the development of 141 residential units, a restaurant, health and recreation dub, and related parking. Implicit in this approval was the recognition of the Marina and marina services building as it then existed with a total of ninety four(94) slips. The Canoe Cove Site Plan is illustrated in accordance with the plan provided in Tab 2. Parking for the Marina is situate west of the existing restaurant, banquet facility and hotel lobby; along what is referred to as Saltgrass Lane; shown on the plan per Graphic I 7A&Graphic 23. Pursuant to the provisions of Jefferson County Zoning Code, the Manna requires one (I)parking space for every two(2)slips, that is, a total of forty seven (47) spaces. Additional parking of thirty spaces is now required as a result of the recent marina expansion; for a total parking requirement therefore of seventy seven (77)spaces. To establish a context for the evaluation of the plan for Lands End, the approved Canoe Cove plan must be analyzed. The Canoe Cove plan is, by reference to project documentation, a preliminary plan. It is apparent that much was yet to be resolved in order to truly define the characteristics of the project. Accordingly, it is reasonable to expect a certain degree of change as the project moves through the permitting processes which interface the original plan with the changes that have been made to County ordinances; as well as to the Uniform Building Code. Our analysis of the approved plan for Canoe Cove is presented so as to provide a basis for comparison and determination of net benefit. To be fair to the plan for Canoe Cove, it must be recognized that it is a preliminary plan and that it did not try to be more than that. Our comments are not therefore to be construed as a criticism of the plan but a means of defining the principal characteristics that constitute the plan; summarized as follows: • The Canoe Cove plan provides for a total of twenty five (25) buildings widely dispersed throughout the site. Six(6) of the twenty five(25) are "principal" buildings,the balance being composed of buildings which range from two(2)to five (5)attached residential units. • Three (3)of the five (5) principal buildings are located south of Alcohol Loop Road (ALR) at a point that represents the highest geodetic elevation of the site. These three buildings are also fifty(50)feet in height. You will note from the site profiles provided herein that the top floor of these structures, as relocated in the plan for Lands End, are at a point roughly equivalent to the ground floor of the highest Canoe Cove buildings in their location south of ALR. ] I j • --J • The three (3) buildings identified as Building Type E on the Canoe Cove plan are located adjacent to lands that are zoned for single family residences. For some reason,the plan sought and was granted yard variances to make the buildings fit into the "slot" of land south of Acohol Loop Road. -I] • The west wing of the Old Acohol Plant,the largest mass on the site, was to be retained. Pursuant 1 to the plan it was to accommodate residential units in addition to the banquet, meeting room, lounge and restaurant facilities that it provides today. The building also houses a pari-mutuel gaming lounge on the mezzanine level. The building is approximately 60 feet in height at its highest point and utilized an in-situ 1 concrete post and beam system that today is in a rather poor physical state. Constructed in 19 I I as a wood alcohol manufacturing facility, the building does not have sufficient structural integrity or seismic capacity to justify its continuing existence. Moreover, the building is largely unused and does not comply with current codes. It is the opinion of the architect that a conversion of this mass to a more efficient and aesthetically attractive space would better serve the project as well as the interests of the community. See jGraphic 19. • A factor of great importance that is not sufficiently addressed on the plan for Canoe Cove is that of Ii parking. It appears that the parking provided for the smaller attached residential units is adequate because of individual garages and driveways, however, the parking provided for the larger condominium and commercial components is not only inadequate but difficult to access. The largest parking component for the project is once again located adjacent the adjoining lands that are zoned for single family residences. As ..] the parking area so designed is accessed from only one point, the headlights, noise and the general intrusion of a large parking area in one's backyard is inescapable. See Graphic 16. • Parking for the restaurant, recreation and health club in the Canoe Cove plan appears to be a total U of only nineteen (19) spaces. The plan shows parking spaces directly off Acohol Loop Road. Such a condition of parking directly off a thoroughfare would suggest that one may park anywhere. See Graphic 16. • The parking ratio for the larger condominium residences on the plan is very close to a I : I ratio. Current market criteria requires a minimum of I .5:I . L • The servicing and parking requirements for the Marina are not indicated. `, • Traffic circulation for the Canoe Cove plan is lacking because there is no indication as to where one should in fact be going, a fact which is exacerbated because there is likely to be no parking space found 1 when one gets there. I • The plan for Canoe Cove does not address the servicing needs of the project. Guest parking, refuse containers, loading zones and such are very much a reality and must be located and designed to ensure proper use while mitigating any negative impacts that may arise as a function of their intended use. • Because of the dispersed nature of the project components coupled with a lack of parking there is ample opportunity for conflict and a lack of control. • The plan does not, to a large extent, recognize the different needs and interests of the site residents versus those of the more transient boaters and commercial patrons. • The open space considerations of the Canoe Cove plan appear to be more a function of what is "left over" as opposed to a networked delineation and articulation of"usable" open space. An overlay of the parking and loading facilities for the marina as well as the boat launch area very much changes what otherwise might be the open space character perceived from the plan. See Graphic 23. • Due most likely to the preliminary nature of the plan, water quality and stormwater issues are not addressed. In conclusion, the plan for Canoe Cove can be characterized by a general lack of plan organization, land use zoning within the site, activity zoning, building orientation and linkage for both pedestrian and automobile within the project. The net result would appear to be a project that, perhaps even to its proponents, falls far short of its intended objective. It is therefore much less than it could otherwise be. A summary comparative analysis of the foregoing characteristics of Canoe Cove with that of Lands End is provided in this document under the tab "Comparative Analysis". The approach to crafting a plan for Lands End requires a recognition and careful analysis of the many facets that create this beautiful site. What we see as particularly relevant is how we can improve on the Canoe Cove plan for the benefit of the project and the benefit of the community it serves. The project will, after all, have a life span of at least one hundred years. Our challenge has been to work within the parameters of the existing approved plan and to the provisions of Ordinance No. 08-0408-96 entitled "Optional Consolidated Permit Review Process"; included in Tab /4of the CCA. The plan recognizes the V//as by the Sea plat recorded in 1997. s of the ject. Guest • The plan for Canoe Cove does not address the servicing and must beproated and des arkdg, o refuse containers, loading zones and such are very much a reality ensurero er use while mitigating any negative impacts that may arise as a function of their intended use. P P • Because of the dispersed nature of the project components coupled with a lack of parking there is ample opportunity for conflict and a lack of control. • Thelan does not, to a large extent, recognize the different needs and interests of the site residents P versus those of the more transient boaters and commercial patrons. • The open space considerations of the Canoe Cove plan appear to be opene a function unction o overlay s of "left over" as opposed to a networked delineationnna as welldas the articulation boat launch area very much changes what the parking and loading facilities for otherwise might be the open space character perceived from the plan. See Graphic 23. • Due most likely to the preliminary nature of the plan, water quality and stormwater issues are not of addressed. In conclusion, the plan for Canoe Cove can be characterized y aen forl lack bothfpllnand tion, land use zoning within the site, activity zoning, building orientation andlinkageperhaps even pedestrian its automobile within the project. The net re sult isthereforemur to be a ph less than it could otherwise be. proponents, falls far short of its intended � A summary comparative analysis of the foregoing charact a�sti�s of Canoe Cove with that of Lands End is provided in this document under the tab ComparatrveAn Analysis". The approach to crafting a plan for Lands End requires arelevant r I vgn tiO how we and arean improvanalysis on any facets that create this beautiful site. What we see as particularly The Canoe Cove plan for the benefit of the project and the benefit of the community been t it work serves. h n project will, he after all, have a life span of at least one lan adred years.nd to the provisions ons of Ordinance No. 08-0408-96 entitled parameters of the existing approvedp "Optional Consolidated Permit Review Process"; included in Tab 14 of the CCA. The plan recognizes te P V//as by the Sea plat recorded in 1997. The project plan for Lands End is illustrated herein as Graphic I&Graphic 2 and can be expressed t as follows: • The primary form determinant for the plan of Lands End is the natural land form itself. The land slopes downward to the shoreline in both the northerly and westerly direction thereby affording the opportunity to locate and stack the parking requirements for almost all the project components in a very t confined and central area. See Graphic I . • Taking this approach then allows the clustering of the principal project components around the parking and service areas, much of which are now covered. The land form is employed to provide varying points of access(along Oak Street/ALR)to the parking areas in a manner that eliminates the need for any internal ramps. See Graphic 13. • The parking areas are naturally illuminated by the terracing effect on the east elevation and by the openings to Port Townsend Bay on the north elevation. See Graphic I I. • Access to the Marina is highly controlled and the boat launch is eliminated. This condition enables the creation of a "pedestrian dominant zone" in the shoreline area that is otherwise overtaken by the activities and parking of Marina patrons. • Marina parking as well as Marina Services are located on the Level l4 and Level 24ofthe Project Plan. Marina services include storage lockers, locker rooms, change and shower facilities, laundry facilities, restrooms, care room, and small convenience store. See Graphic 3 &Graphic 4. • Project services are located on Level 36, a level that has a floor to floor height of sixteen feet; thereby allowing entry of essentially all service vehicles including garbage disposal trucks and delivery vans. F fi • The interface between the parking areas and the habitable spaces is a highly articulated Pedestrian a Spine on the east/west axis that provides•linkage throughout the project while simultaneously creating a strong and positive outdoor open space experience. The pedestrian spine also provides a means of transition between the various project levels emanating from the land form and facilitates access to vertical it circulation systems. This corridor is a strong point of interest throughout the project, providing a "path" and Ir place of meeting for the project population. See Graphic 14. a a • Aso of note is the placement of the buildings such that view corridors are opened to and from the r Shorelands, the Marina, and Port Townsend Bay. Building cost criteria would su.:est the consolidation of • the three small "Bayview" buildings into one larger building; but then we would lose much of the interface with the shoreline if this cost approach were adopted. • The largest mass within the plan for Lands End is the Mansion at Lands End, located in the same position as the east wing of the existing complex. The Mansionedbens at Level 6 aand d ete ds s t hroud ough to the "dormered" roof spaces on Level 96. An east/west o g has been project density. See Graphic 2. • It is interesting to note that this point of highest density on the site is adjacent and across from lands which are a part of this application.. Suffice to say, any impact of this particular building is largely mitigated by its location. View corridors are now open from all lands to the• One approaches the project from both Charles Street and George Street and by reference to the plan one can see that these "approach vistas" are particularly long.ece ton afnd drop-off area.roach to the nsion along See Graphic I I. George Street culminates in a landscaped plaza that servesP • The Reception Centerwhich is essentially replacing the banquet and meeting facilities of the existing building is located adjacent the Mansion in a manner that allows for the pick up and drop-off of persons that may be attending a wedding or Port Hadlock Rotary Meeting, separate from the traffic using the central plaza. See Graphic I . • Located on Level 36 is the Health Club&Spa as well as the principal building services for the complex as a whole. See Graphic S. • The_Pavilion Lands End is situated over the Marina Services area and is the intended location for a primary restaurant and lounge. Such buildindg isthocate �eddalong s t�o pedestrian and the Port Hadlock community from the project parking areas,the shorelands, large. See Graphic I . • Because the principal building components are clustered around the servicing and circulation infrastructure for the project; such servicing areas and parking access is significantly more efficient. Impervious cover is greatly reduced with a corresponding reduction in the environmental impact normally associated with service and parking areas. Calculations setting out the differences between Canoe Cove and Lands End are provided. The increase in parking spaces provided in the Lands End plan notwithstanding, impervious cover areas are considerably less for the Lands End project. the three small "Bayview" buildings into one larger building; but then we would lose much of the interlace with the shoreline if this cost approach were adopted. • The largest mass within the plan for Lands End is the Mansion at Lands End, located in the same position as the east wing of the existing complex. The Mansion begins at Level 36 and extends through to the "dormered" roof spaces on Level 96. An east/west oriented wing has been added to consolidate project density. See Graphic 2. • It is interesting to note that this point of highest density on the site is adjacent and across from lands which are a part of this application.. Suffice to say, any impact of this particular building is largely mitigated by its location. View corridors are now open from all lands to the south. • One approaches the project from both Charles Street and George Street and by reference to the plan one can see that these "approach vistas" are particularly long. The approach to the Mansion along George Street culminates in a landscaped plaza that serves as a reception and drop-off area. See Graphic I. • The Reception Centerwhich is essentially replacing the banquet and meeting facilities of the existing building is located adjacent the Mansion in a manner that allows for the pick up and drop-off of persons that may be attending a wedding or Port Hadlock Rotary Meeting, separate from the traffic using the central plaza. See Graphic I . • Located on Level 36 is the Health Club&Spa as well as the principal building services for the complex as a whole. See Graphic 5. • The Pavi/ion Lands End is situated over the Marina Services area and is the intended location for a primary restaurant and lounge. Such building is located along the pedestrian spine to provide easy access from the project parking areas, the shorelands,the Lands End community, and the Port Hadlock community at large. See Graphic I • Because the principal building components are clustered around the servicing and circulation infrastructure for the project; such servicing areas and parking access is significantly more efficient. Impervious cover is greatly reduced with a corresponding reduction in the environmental impact normally associated with service and parking areas. Calculations setting out the differences between Canoe Cove and Lands End are provided. The increase in parking spaces provided in the Lands End plan notwithstanding, impervious cover areas are considerably less for the Lands End project. __. I�Ju_ 1 A A A • The largest structures are located furthest from the single family zoned lands and because of the land form and the variable grade elevation, said structures appear much lower from the single family zoned nlands. See Graphic 18 &Graphic 18A L Pursuant to Jefferson County Zoning Code, reference datum for determining building height is taken from the Uniform Building Code 1994; specifically: Height of building is vertical distance above reference datum measu selected o the by either averageotee ht of a the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof The reference datum shall r following which ever yields a greater height of building: 1 1. The elevation of the highest adjoining sidewalk or ground ground S ice is not in a -fot horizontal tal feet distance of the exterior wall of the building when such sidewalk M above lowest grade. . _ +� 2.An elevation 10 feet higher than the lowest grade when the sidewalk or ground surface described in Item l above is more than 10 feet above lowest grade. 0 The height of a terraced or stepped building is the maximum height of any segment of the building. An illustration of building heights for Lands End opposite that of Canoe Cove is presented in Graphic 18& I Graphic 18A. • It follows that the views from such lands are also much less impeded. • openspace The s ace network for Lands End is intended to be a means of linking the various elements of j =g the project, both natural and man-made. • Architectural sketches are provided to illustrate the intended architectural character of the project. The placement of buildings and contextual elements such as the that con�'tute an architectuaedthatPs apped yrdens opr ate are collectively a choreography of form, color and texture for this extraordinary site. See Graphic I I &Graphic 12. — • As demonstrated by the Villa San Juan(now under construction), split-face and saw-cut limestone is a primary building component. The lower levels of thedproj irk like they belong and havewill use a heavier textured li°perhaps"mestone abeen t a scale that will provide the desired effect ... that the buildings— there a long time. See Graphic 32. UI 41 I • Whereas the economic impact of the development of Lands End is not the purpose of this document, it is evident that such a development would have a very positive impact on Jefferson County in several categories, not the least of which would be many permanent jobs as well as significant sales tax, excise tax, business tax and property tax revenues. • The Shorelines Compliance Analysis to accommodate the revision as proposed is provided in the section following the Lands End/Canoe Cove Comparison Appendix. The plan for Lands End., where adventure begins has made a sincere effort to become an asset to its host community. Arca and Tillman Engineering have enjoyed the deliberations and discussions that have culminated in the preparation of this application. We have appreciated the assistance and cooperation that has been afforded by you and your staff. We are hopeful that we have met the criteria that will enable a favorable decision. Thank you for your attention herein. Sincerely, • Arca Tillman Engineering, Inc. Architecture & Urban Design Corporation , -a CI.M. j://44..—, Alan B. Clark AIA Ryan T man P.E. Principal Principal Jv 1 - .+ r --- LA , � Z N i 00, E 4. O 7 CU •wv � DO —o O Z til iS ZD ,.a 73 _,..„. . '" '''-,. ,, c r, or -,-,-,',...,„, N > -T)'. m ' 3M D i , \,.. D ( r 1/ m.. m oo .�ISS,, 1 % ~, 1 • i t f'^ '4.--4.34-.' ' *^a<..°a '�`�`' 1l'Ic .. a , `1� "ASS.:. y t „�^"""'.r'"' - yy • i 1 .� E' 4�.4 ,_3'`k'F','Aa'"a"• �4 s.-4' .s 'l/ - -�.A _.,as _ , , -- �� t_ `,' <l q� k.-..,.,-, sr - t �' k - i r- _ - ' I :, t. ..L i 1. - -,I-' 1__..It. :,". al,* 1� t. , _.� 1 �- ... 1 ,r9---"� 4 } 1 , ' .. lig 'cam '47 �. �� 1 / � • _ t 1 1� 1 i w ��Y 4. r4 p$�Y�t` d L Wtl.. . \ 1. --,-- , t t, __,__ "..:..._ -,--'--...r- ”.. 4,,„_,...A.,,N - ...„ , . ".....2:91>,,,,,. tt ,...,,, 4,. •=. „,,t‘,„7, iNkvs,e,.0.;....-.. ".?, � t . ",,,,.4-- :,1-k .,,. !, ...;--, - -v.:-..ill...41- 4/,‘, ,A.,..,,,,,.tie.„'*.-: .4 . •,. >, - • . • . , ' -17. '' 'CI r r' liffli 4,0 1'"" ' 4-•,1"'-. ',XI * t...".. `-' -*--.__ - . rt.,41-4,4 *,.:''. --.4•_? ,,,, ',...,-i-*;%, , '''N,,,,,_ i ^�- � i _ >� 1 _ i x k ?r r. Yui cs ,-r a .1',e,: ' j e.i., rk t- t r L i- ! 4 Opt s��°"`�iiil �r �x i ▪ 47: 14.-'):e a�� i Y <3'.1'11 ,"{`s n z • t p ( J ,„ - 1 ',4111E1116•0P ( 4 ^' `� t. .,-.,.. ,,,,,,,,,- , L.44k.. -.- ".'..' .7,`..'-i.---- .A. - -- \''.. [[1- -f"-t _ I ti - - • L 1,,,t,:',7-•,,. ' ki'IL 1.m IPS U�iraw�wr.rf !!'� d i t t - i i. ▪ 1 F a-.s .r`�`F .: tA. les 1t t 1 , , , r4it4.1. ;.1 . r rT1 y ...., 1 __?',,,,_Z____ ` atY vt4 AYE. 1 a+ t 1' t\ ; ` • tL t r 1 'P'' L= 1__17 7.....;Jt--L-- i �:a '3 - rl _ - - s j ...j P 4,4i4.-•4't .�.. '-'r'* ... . .ms Ys -i} ... , , .' '?° S,S " k t.', 3kwd. a P ',Aa;+ ' k , cx-.r rXlx '4,1,,,A..., .µ .�' "x4 _yt ""° *1 � `4,a ..a lor • ;74+da+.`v.aHy. ,^ r+ ,«ALtn*I- ei A,. 7i` x > y4,,,,,,- � '� • v a _-s °fr : ro .s. :x n a „s '� tam +my=41c '+" "' °. . +r *'t�,��-a s trl0x 'rwfe ,,,,,...3,*,.,,,'I.,'..,4''•'44:',4.-,- , '17';,,-,„ci,t. -,,,N-4.,,-.,,,,... , - .A.,_ vt,-, ,,,,,,,,,..•• • ',_:,,, ,,,,,,I; I '1 1\ ‘ '1. 1 , I ' , , - '4„),"',., .,„',., '. '1',N4t,,,' '„,,,n,-.•,,,S.,•' t ' '.4`4, ,' ::•.'e',•1'•?*,,ii,';•N, -'14,--..- .. .14Qt,';'.., -r), . 1.7 - ,•,r-1._.„..,,,',,-, , S> .7 % ' \ ''''' 4.;..'''''S, Vt,itA,''tft% '•'.,4' 4,..,iN, \ . - . , . - - -4:ti-,-• v-‘ • ''''•• .-, . . • , . . -0‘ -.,,'-•,-.„,. .-st.,-..--., ••-,,, -.- 4 V-: '-#.0. 4.•, .:. ,,, ''•,,,,:',,, ....`, 1',,,iiiita-34'•-,,,,1,,,,,,,....' m.mg.Sty,*.‘•'‘‘;,....1,,,,,'-,;,,-,'r, .:..`- --',.-, , 2, ..'N•ii-r-:,*k.;-ks,,,-‘,. . ., . --1, 'N''It'''',.• .*N‘e.- ' • 6") 7.•::=,7•i''..,. ...4.i.S:;!',--2 Y ' •' ,-,„ ., .. ,• ' ' ''t \-l'''''. . ,,,- .X.,,4:'1,,,,--,‘, -, *"."-,• ' •- ';- ' ';;;4i.,26/V))1,;!,.. Vi'l. . ' ' s ' 's't..,-.'"4,„; ..:\ ...' ,- 4.'ti,'.,..:, 1 :.*4`,,Ar,:'7', " ''..', ,,,,',-.;;,-;.':'''''•' , ..,,, -',' .. t',77- ' ' ' ,'', ' . .,,irek,'''4,,:1,-.. ‘44'••- .4.t' ' '''• . , - ., '':::'• -::. --• ',"'- '-'-'•-•• 4' .: ' ‘-07:''''' 41;- ':- '''." ' '' - '. • . - \:-T‘tc, -,•c,•.."4' -N•2:: „ ., ,,.., ,p,r# ,,,,,7_,,,...-.....„:,.,;•._, L ,,,,,,4„ .,,,,,,,,,,,;(,,,.21.:7,,,,,,,,,, , la.„0.46‘,„.-6,g4 -,it.i.. -.'.,- *- -,••••-•'-- • .• '-;' , ,:, ''. .\\' :''4''';'..1",, ::,',...,.,.-::::7,--.. .•.' .. ' .,.S'S'4,.. , --,-t,::',..:',',".,\'.'.:_,,,&4., "''' .S-,4.7.1;',--7 .,.., , ,,,,,,'. ' 'IV!' ---li•Itilisis! ,-‘;,--,,;•%_:-'',- ` -,',„-'1f.`."-,,, ' • • '''',7-;',.•• ''''. ',.=•'":•,,,.' '•-••.•-,-z•-: '..N••'7‘..7',',7--1:%, "-1.* i.-...),APIP-3%,' - 1_4. Ilir-1 e...,-;-:---4ft•'• -ttr- ''' ' ‘' - - \ ,-•'.----,,,v-,-:•4•:,?''''''t,....,4t-;- --r....,n-1 -4.-.-* -. . . ----'-'''' . . . .. . -- 14 „.,....."-- „:-',, ' eirei• '''''''''''' ' ,,,,•:.4'.....,,,X„..C.." ---' i \ ':.. .'L'AVI,';'-•4 ..----,..........-, , , ablinia=v1..12•t:'*-•-':it.C:', .'1,7* *:.r'r .' ,: r4,1 41%,- 'Z'' ,,,,'..4,,,..1., .;ir 1.•,',,4 ' . , *".*. ',,,,mhoW4,...4 ;,,' 1'.".., ; -.' '••': '',t •' , .fe - . 4. - --- 40t, - . ,e,t ,, , • i: 4't ,t,".77--- ,H:,-11. 1•-, E....-4,,,,,,-..4, •-,(,44-,,4-, , _.... .. . 4 ‘ •.• .,..,, ,,,,. .... „.„.„ A ' "tet!" i . . ,,... 6'-...14;*'"( - . . . .. . aviala . , ..-4,'•, I?: . MI. '''. -1 4•4'." 111 _ --, ,-..•, ,,, - • ' .. ,... , ... . ,•41%,. (In -",,, -.P. 1- . '. ek ,:,,„ - t ts.."..-' •,•••.% , , . '',--•••*.-.7,-' ,k,- - 72- . . t • ""... ...____-'''",'''''.4':**''' „›,'.--,-- -.-:'. ,- ....,.,...ker - ...„, , . I i i > ) .'..-• k.„.,6,4,. ..% • . : 4, ,',- -t„ ' , . I 44 ' •-• - - - 4 .-'4 . - ' • ' ., . '. , Z .,..‘. ,i j ,1.07f0.''... .'. *4111#10 .''„_-.tit, . - -.24,4_ -,-.!•,, , , ••`•-.: „. L , . Lo -4,-!.0.)-.--- -4.. - .•'.; .''' ..,.Ai,,,,, , 1 .... 4, .,,,,:' 4#4.41're ..,,,,,,.,,,,. , ,„ r.: 4.'"-lac% !,‘,-;;;,. .,.. . • ' - -,-. •-,,,,-..,567,:-;,'"..,''.:.:,..-.44.';‘,:i.:1-:. -. -••.i. t- ,....,,,, , ,...',... it 0 M ,,. i - • ,.-'' -:."-,,-.41 - , - _. ' - .", ,,its. \ k, •,,' s • 41, . 4 1‘'''''' ... .":.*:•,•,:,,,... " * :' , Aillr' , . .......). ,,_,,,e.„ m m..t.., ,.. -::, - ., , .6, .-- 1‘ ..-,:-,.. -, t:&,,- \ . ig-r!,/: 7-t,vr ...:•,-:- Z ‘'n--- -• - ''''•• •---'4".-! lip--------t - sk.‘ -1:-1--A'7 •:'-4,--4iN.. ... - :=--._ .;;9.,..- -._- ii l':4,N,' .-' -"'•••-•'''--4'"'A.A.'' '' ' N . It ., v) .„...,:--- .5..,.....;--.... . ---174, - -.-.,'•- -..- -',- ,.,-. 4./.14.4e --' -- ,-•.-.; . , II ' T ,. _ -,,,-., 4.. ,, _ ,-. , .:,..w.,..4„4„....„_,..„.„.. ;,,,. .,,.0, :,......44,,..2,. , .4,4 _ -• -',",,,..;.;fiA 66246 "*""-';'-- -;-- .- '• .'-'-"*""""""".. 1 ....,;" . 13•'• -ii _,:1 ..;101r6"%'A' '• ' ."::'-:"*11"'"- .**4-.•\''••'"-'' ' '44""'"*"--' '-' ' *''' •*''"''''' t*-='•. * ::.,':,, •I , ..- 4.,,,,..---,I .,,kilfmtv - i lio - m - .-. . ',lick*, ,,„,.-" _ . -, , : 7-- ,, raioot . z.. - ' L,SI ' i), :•,, 7. ''''',0,,,..V; 3 1 .:1.‘......;,...., -.,01 .1„..4,0.1,41w.„.. - - - -1, sT„,...7.,.iii • .5_ ,;.,..ts!,,,,, ‘ - ••,-1A,..,-,z*,•,,,,„..,.., , ,. -,1 \* --- RJ .. s ,1„,,, r-425..-•; \7o v) ......---t.,:. -I „.1%-----±,iti,•,...::-...-',- ?.;:r.,t,,,,'''--..,-''',--„,-, .--\ \ '..-.?' -•-... . hi 7.... : „, ..„1: m. . •.....t.z.Ay: afiss, rk, "-,,,,i,e, t,..4, -. -,,, ,-....•irioN-- ii.-.1 -:;,,'.v,•-,•-,•,t--,,,...•.4, , -... , , . 11.: as taigas Vitl.•'*-°='''41*.' '-',*.*744,..-.,,- :Ise rrlf , '1,',.ik 1:14 44..'0'.,1‘tiiiiiiiiii,44?',.;:.''•• -1-.',4_;4•;•,.' ' . -*\ '' sum , rkt,,,,..; ,.:- ...cid. . .".: . , - ,t,!,.•,,,,g-, - '-.33.,,, , - -‘,..- •••••„,;,.. It ii,Loft " -1,..,.: . . c-, ..1,-...•,_ - Nv... • - ' '- ., . i - .----- --- --- , ---- • ,,- • ,14iiiiiii-; 4' .: , •„, . 4' '''' 44,C. :... 4 i * '' 0 " " ' - --, 4,,,;,s-,-.c.,,,,,:;:..,rr: . -....--.:, ',.,....,.'_..*-,..-4;.,. ', -t...*... _,11 .t*Ii,...- --. ',:-''''''" ' - - .7N, • , - 0.7._do m-0 sztui,- , ' - '14.zik'v.,...•- ri, lf - .. 41t, li i.,..,----•.7,... , *--1•17141r.et*,....:4MIVV .. 1.' '' ....:;Y;ift7-1...-?•-'',"! . -,pyk, -•-, - T.-.`•"-:•-•-.;',%',4 :.....,-7:- .,, •:`1/4.:%--,?.,,..•-•,,,,4,1'0,.,„,,,..:_-...•cg,,,,•f,-,. .. _'.. ,, i •• wiz,•4•;?•••,',,'",.-4: 'im lail ri• ,,,i3 0 ,.......-- , .. e- ,--,--; '•, '.• f.-7,-.--.. -,..T.t.: ---.. .-;.,4..s.,:,-...-_,.;%.--.-sit.,-y,---.77.---.- --,\,t,:. :• _::-1,,z, 1 -.r. r.-_,- 444. r. - t-.0.---)-- , -- ,•-'- - ---. rr- .- kci.. I ,..... vi tu.:::--; . -,..,...,-........„..,_i t-.. . , . ..„.,..... ..., . . . ii,,,,..c ,,,... .. . .,..i . ..!, „....... . -•-•.r,, -,,•,;:-.,--4,-.3-,;.-,..,,,,. Kt*.'"A:"''• i-';''• •• ' f `•• .:''''''''''''t""''''..16r • •*--• ' m 1 : e--ir..41-iir`b, -f ,,,,,,,,tti:.e..,3, i44zite;,;- , 1 1 ... erwAsi . ,„,-.------ .T.._. - :,,,:-,--,-...)i,.--- 4.,..,,-, ,..-- Iv'. - .4. ..A:.,-'4,-..,-Z:s,". - •'-- - ' •-‘•.-'''', wolf 1.4. • ! L. -1,--,'' -- •4'1. :-!.:.- ---i-.1 '•Ct*-1/`,.- '.', 1:'..4'.1.4‘1•1''. r 1144,, L.i..,1:0,51",', '''''''' -`:;',-:''''4-i.'-k•:.; -',"•*• ••••-•.4, ..:' ' '';61-1 ' - 19 V V- '17- ."; - .' ,..t- ..'.,..:.:••, ',i'lr''k'V''''*4.1.- rtil 1,: 1,1t_.- 44-`...• L'• :PIW,yr , .• ,'.'...;',14:t ,:--:-.Z:-,,4,',.: ... ,.., ,.. !v;. , . . _ , - y fr.4-, 40/;'4=-1,,q,-"'."..,,-'.', '- ' •1„,-'•,‘,,,',. 4. _.,,;-:-;,::::,...„-?6,,,*-".^-:.7.,',-1,:c. 4 -•N"•(4'.6ji*Z:'''i-:-.'1•'*:, * ' --'','"Ali A', --; -, ,..„,.. _,,,,,,,,.,,..i„.....„ ...,,,,,,v„•,,,,,.. Ark ,,,, „.,„.„,,- ,;„„_„-,.. of,,1 t. illi ,..,..t.„.„,-.2"1„,;., ,....,4 ,4. . ...,..., . , ,,,,,:,,,, ...?,,,,, =t.,, ., . -.:''''.z,r: :::,,,,, ' i2•..'---:.-:: ::''';';''-..'-'-'1 ' l''''..:',r I. :"... .V4,4 '1 t:... , '4"/ ' ‘ . . "4. ''.- " ( era --,ip,ea.,.' --y;':' . iy)....,, ,i.... .,,,,' ..:-.:-',.. ••;--.. ' ' . ,.- -',.,`,,,..,.,...44s......... - " i. ^",,, p. '',,, 't.''''' ',...,-,,,,,i.L., ' ' ', -....44, .--, "P..... '644%i...4.411'Aei•tkT.•''ri4•14,04:11 -717:'' '.''''-- . XN4',,,r ..,!' 0 4 t"*„ -,,,,,, - ,t,.,,,t,,,,4. -,f. .7'.-r, Viik .'•,-",";,,f.„,',1•• 14...!' 44.,',,,'44--,, -,,•.,..',.. -- 1,4',"'le 4.1-.., •''-...4..N.°,...i'' ''''' p ,i-_, --- --..- - . .,'N,..‘,..t.1,-7"., % -,• ask 3,..„.„ , .-. .., r,......4 . r ..... .. . .;,. urp ,,,.$1:e4,,- - r, .. .. -•,....„ ,w r ,,... ,-,,e- ' :.--- „L.,751, .„„: -_ .,... ,,,,,,,-4:--;--:-..,,r.:,:-- -,..t a t., e'', ls-:-. 1,:, • ' i ' ,. , ,--.1',Z..i.,,,IL ,,7,-„i••r' 0 as .-,,, . , - : z, „T.,._41..,..,.. .it,,,,:::m r) =.- ,,„- ,,;„..,. ,;,, ,, ,,,....J.... 1 --. ' ,..... -,', ....'.r... - ..,- :,4 T.1*AT,,, . !.' • 6. , ' ::•. -z ill, r....!ifi - .,,,-.„--;,„,.. .,-• • r--,,,..1..........6.;-,--,, --„,,-,,7:- -- : ;.-_, 1 , • _____. ,. ,.., „:.,...--7cr.t. .-:• , _ _,,-,1,,,,, - +..-: - N., I , . - ...-;,! . ,a ,-„ -. .--.,,-41t'it .• ',,t,i,..• ni , -Asir,r..---,-- -: . ir;..., - -,-,.,...,:----- ..„,,;:n:,. ..:,.- ' •-• .,.,-.. .-:--=:. --,-7.----Efol... •• 1.7-`,.- . “ •-.-,-4-.. ..3. -i .--_,..---i- ,e1 \ -,•• .. -- C %,,,,, • ,,\11•:,-24"- ; s, 1 v; 1 1 ..A.14.1" L'_•'' ''''.--'''''''1".,- ::.14:"., '.•IT f. :11•-,,,.n,,,,,:,,„. _,,,,,, , , ft.:. ..,,, --L,ak s,.. _„-:11(44,. -....d.., k-4441N' L VP't:: ..,4,4N,.... :,,..P" 1,•,:'-'' '---- , 47-:;,,.41 ,..:„.„• •'*•: ..,-_..,,,,•,-*:-.', - •-,-"'-',,,ott -.'-•:-- 2+4- .'• - - ma,i. .1.,„,,,,,.__• .i.,.. -. ' . ....--_- ..„.,,,,,..--, it.,..,••• .F.4- 4.*„,,,t,,4_,,..11 :oil'- am. VOW. ',1.1.:,:::., --'.---'''.-:-...4'.:7' S'''''''..'.... ' ...-- 3 "„::r...,..v.-6,7,`...-:'''.--`,':,;1% .,,,,.., '...,;,-,::.;.!. '.1.•A.,4,4,„,. . .1;iF--': _'. , . .,..--`'''' i - --4::*",1;,,;,-;.,r, ;; 1...,. --''' ' --z'''-* - -t-- _-, AF,. -•, , , - . „..,...,-,. No- . ...,•..---7:-•,,-- - 1 1 ....-1 . -,.. ., ,..-) - "......-..---;4,,.... ..1 -,..„ , ,. •--,.-- • ......:,. ...... . 11 r , !; -. .• - V) do .- o .... .. . . , i 1 , •r ... • ; i-- „,,,,........ ' '"' • VI 0 - •-•''--: - -4411IP , r''''.-. -"'". ''''''''- - ''‘:.:7. '''' f.1 ' 1 • :‘-rn . . ,,,-"f ' ' , N„....0 ...0.,,, , '''..11:::f.:::',111:1",- r:2.,,d.' ' ' ii:44-4,-,..;,..,.. -• :-_-,-:.,-......,,-44.-- . , , --......., -s-R.., i zo-0,...; .......,*........... I • ' 1t41..7,,,,,..'''„,p.v.1*,,,,„:-,,'",-,:-7.::-.44.... ..ili7i-_:' .,....1* ''.:: .0.'!"..' . . .-..• i 4126." ..r L. __;-,-,-., -,::4 ',,,.:-zi.".,,,:"."" - . . t i „lilt,'.-i.r.Z'7, ''Mtifr,;."7‘."' ,i.,,\,-,,i1;‘,144 ''',.firCiZt, ' A' 4, ' ' •' ' •V '*r. '' ii ..6 „w.,,,,:l. .-.;,•,.--.„, -•-k.-•.' --,..'-4-ik, „-•:-,-,,,, -„*„,-., ,.... .---c-, •,'•• , '"k, .'.'. -,•-, .' .;,* A, • - ,.. '- , ..,,,- •-i4q..„,••'•-•c,",-",•,,,,i.' •',,Ak'''. "`,-•• '---,•-f,,,„,_-,- '.-Vietg•S„,,c.,-..'rt••••,'•:::`,-, -","•••. .'-,`-..-.--.z.,s',- s , .- ••. • -,..._., ., - I.I - ' .r,-• ., - -- _,,, '•,,,,,,,.‘,.., .:Aitii,-..,.:,-,,,;„;,,,,,J,„-yi..-:-..,,,, ,.- -"IN. -,-.•?: ,. .„..f.,., ._' . . '. ,.: {''.,.' ''''''''..Z''''''' - ''''''. ' '' . ' '.'' ''''. '' . 'N'-',Itsfs$4. :-:.;'•.:-•---t--,t,,,. ...,-,:',Alti--,... ,- , •4.- .;„,...#,,... - . .. .--a .=---- . • • o r _ _ f \ r • I k,,s. ,„., ��� x 4 ,m,,,,,,,,,,,,,,_ :„,::-..,,,1„.i'aliitlz,1°: Y _ r 't -t '�,e:1 F"^,,,:i la. ..4- •:4 x^s rf e x • -il \ • ` I g t r r` v b y nr \ • i I - g a w z'x. s z -g a`4 .3"`' -. • / k.'.''h.gx t. } d �Y. 1 L fit.. A te"�k= \\ J y r "+yam ,�. ria--•,,,,I ` \ . iiikW:2;09,41A,Si,-..;,:ik;:.-, u' -J''%`''V'C..,: it:FMf.'?: .:i7i163a.,,,*--'-':tiin?-t.'40:.,'P."',,,-- \ ,x,;74,a,..,-._,:e.A.6s.045,w.:;:,;:o 04.4;,0, -,.• _ :.',:,.;!;;,.::4-.-..2.,: a.-ggy24,,,M::-.:,:"'n.:,.;.,_,::'--0_ _ 1 z1 t f: = z �•r.,;::::::: z.�sax-:: ,:,6::::, .a.Y'+.z r C^� - J `1 \ , ==. 3c a ti Kf G y ., -, ka o — — 1 — C/ , C _\\ Imo', 4.xCon ,.y ° �,0?/: A f ,su... ,-..�x-,,, k«.5...�n a »i�r-Lcit (-wx.�" %; ,?,as ' r x.' " ., ',.. x —1— — — i• 1 SD' �+i��. m v, f 1 ,�'i x x ^� Jt t .r ,k L:4 - _ P I r i 1 �.h. .fu ti'+r Lw __,,.\ 0rr0.- I.\I FI11 '' •• ,. , -- ..k • .1: • -•. 3 1 _ I1I, ,-,,N_1 ,_• = 1 ,• , i N1 N\ 11.\ 1 II \ 0 1 • • • • • • \ ; ���,� \ _0 I I \ Z ` ��-- ___. \1 1116.. 1 1 x n -yam- • • • • • C • ♦ • • ♦ • • • a \ > Iii �1 ,N \ \\ 0 \ 1 u , \ \ L J \ `\ . ---N r \ ` t• 1 I \ �\ I � \ ' \ 1 \ 1 1 \\\ \1 ?0. — —���' \\ / / / _ _ '� - - -7 . �.,._T / N 7 -- --- —r---- ____ ; ,, „v.. tie:. \ 50, , ._ ---- Lvi \ \ / - 1 _ 1 I 1 � I _. / V I ,� -�- `- r / \ \ -'''\---.. 1 -ice, _ — _ 11/ • \\ qqI I ` \ , adm--Hil , ,,,,,, , \,„ __,, , 3 I I I 1_1 „.... \ .440, iw _ \ --eo- :0-.3.--.-.. / ,\, \ \ I , r-1 II _ MAI I - , I--- - - I - - +- -� 7 . S0 �� '#'.°WA1 14, . -- .,...•-„..00ifirri:/OA, •\,. , .........- ---— \or \ _ 1 L / , \ L�' LuJC1/ 3rf r”"' S cV r z \ \ 1 . - _zr— - ,,_ t 1 1 ..„ , \ • cti 7 M \, cln r.) N -0 \ 41. .„ \ ----, -. __ _ _ __ — — • N__ _ — . . _ — • . - _ — . __ -,. -... • — _ — _ g.,4,4.4k0;1--.,•- _ 1 ,:,,-.,„\-,.....,,,i•h:..,..-o‘ , rea .0trt,- •i-.,„:".-..';',,..--". --.:.'„:11,m ittlitti--.„,!1 . !e,AV;;;::'' . ,;:-'.M44j1d,.....,,OSIC,: ',.:.: • ( I Vie:'-'.-'•,k4..1.,,,,„-"w . .1 f t-..t•*, ,a4:0-00gt,M,Attat,,*.gyi„tr40..t0AlittAt,qt,t,ttte,.,Alt&Kett\Pffil"; 't-, -.........-- -Lr- ''''',,-"-----'0.t- -----.,,,,,..„Itv,f,„:„.4 , ,.„,_ 6 a--;,.,L.,. aio.,,,,...g.,,,,,,,„ i ---, ,/ 7;. ',- if0*,$VCN;',- ;;-:• -;.-045.,,n1.0.;":.:-.;;••'-•;.:;-=,••••,Y,-,:.-g,s1,,Pv-,4,,-- -MA.r.f-, „,iill III= %•40eg-::-a•6,0- l,M7,;5,mO':.30RMve'-,0t--4e.3'-;': 0.441p0.t,i1g.,4.:k:4t01g-"tg4ii40-,.•-Vi.$t,%4i,-.fz.,.•. , 7 / * iim . 4 / n * , ww . p / --i:: a /- 4/ -N '-.. - i,V,Q.Pdail20iigiQK. i,l :. .lvglIt gOVW-4.4,fati,,iwk-1. $ / .44,:4:*.gSg,tirt.:'...v :iii:iitilgaq.#7,ti':'''':i''''''::.:.'4.•:it'a4Ge..'- :'CI i Ku..7w- R'-41 \ \ \ ggitiSF".wki'A'N014@-0 Spvc-4--;0 :.:_-i:)-... imgrigtzgya omailig.NaglitgOA:kiliT4C,4,',' **Tark.i.:-T4cRoi7:,mr.:, , ___,,---dA.,,,,,•„.....,,,,v , :•:2••, ttnim:,',•,t,,,,inv:',n,,-,,,tRttfAr,--tk,,,,tt etlark,a..,;,*„,:m4„•,----.'r-:,.'=pm, ma ., vc.„.4,,:,v \ ta,77.-0,i,,,t,ftet0,7,,,,..tt.3,,•,•; , ,,,,•4.immot,..-,,,,,,:,:,i,ii,4,,,,,,g4tMtA7.7,. ,•,.„.,,,,,aow,,g•A ,,„,,4,,,.on„,i,,:,,NFcgo,,,,,,,,,:„,„,,,, c:; fil',01:01N:l'i..121;MNAV.4104:.*WittOeStat'M'',,q• fgi aa-- : IA:kgazgrf ,.41.g,,z•lotalizz;,-,...:,10, , ( ) 'l'',:g.:011,11e'..' - ---: .,:lfii1)14.0.;f16,.N.';:.t•- .10.0.2N.Pmile-61. - '' \ - . :2> ''-'4'7'.7.[.*Ii.f.t,15pkg,•';';','.1' '' ',„1,;',.:Migeli:Mr''':'I:""TAVAit`, ,.." itottrOngt*t•t4ttt':Ii up 3,104,6iik...,••, :.- -'.:-::.g,.:pfxr,oii,,..„„-:•;;;,-,,,,i_::.06., -;,-,,;,4--,,,:',.,1,-.::1-, "\.kill,'e,t,.4,-,- i 1 , \ . 1 1_, .,-- -•;,--;41A-kootz,:,... .. .. .,4.1.31gg.. 7.,:;,4.,.;7.-i;i4V,RtrZ,. .-t;:t4...,1::4, i-,,., ,„.,,w, .,.ri 4, . \ - - ,-c- -4-4.;':'7-.0:-Wilas4ALL: '-,L--1•Zitrt.1.1j:g .!2_,.•!fti,f-1011,-1P::'1•F'x,"-- .7.‘,._ 5,-, .'-,!,:!!,:'.-,,,ecellar.,,PrI" t — — ‘\\--i--_,:::. ,i'ilh,,,,L;.g.''VW42t,„00 ±,WV1441_,,,.__,P,tgeti,%,G__,_•6 _,,,'1, ,,sPARPlik;,*N44-,.44,4„..a..A... .•...i,• ,,,2•,,,. :;•„a,Mai.At _ _ — — i/ 1 ,-,,'-•t4-.,-,„1,_,-,'.Aw-xt„04,4,40.kk,piii--,1*.i5--tri4R--Ki4-#7--,,,,r,Mgeii p: :-4,-:.;;',.-41M-Or .1.':-'4:j-l';: .'i -Z W,V1,..*"*T-- 1 — — - .. /1 D=. \ '434406MiNtl**011444441604440044W44,4*- 7 g..,;', ... .41LARilkv4i-,,, \ . r_ -4,4:-,,tooitiorge.gattAtp:AtINS0110,.•';31,•44;,,V-41 e- mg, _ _t, ...,,,,4 ) 0 0 ( ,v::- -:-,,,,.---s •----- - '•- V. 1 P \ i - •,,,,,-,•,.....,,,,,,,,*„..,z,,,,,,,,,ar 4.twttetkf,441,1;,,,,,,,,,,,N.:1,wo,SitF,-,,ng;";',OttatrAiTtt .• .:'''v• ,. 1 = 1 7:7-7----A•Rfx,,i4,.;,,,,„;4a0:4•04;:o .: i,•••;,•.-40.•00,,,,,..,„,,,,z;:,;,,,,-i:,.-4t ; --.. ,, \ ..:,•'- .;,,,,,,,4-N-PAMA!4,7g,:4TAA,,,,,,‘...Ar-FsgetWAAWL.,....,k,,,',,,,Mt'ar0.,‘.'%,,AKA ,,,k,... '1 ' , , ,mogw I r- NtiV:::-IANW'''.'-'1:'-'•''' 11ilfW1-,'.etggiViN14 :0P• ISA , . 1- • A•,::::: -7:vzig.-::,-.:' -•••: - .----7,-fteotfimii,.... .,,,,,§40:440g:gifts- , 1 1--- 0 k , ---,-----.-, i. i ".ii I ''''1:-''''';''''''':' ..ritgerl,%<:.". - . /7\ \ tt‘.n El ---33-----1 i:,,.;?„.:,:k--„-,..-..:-Z.,gi.t,'„-..itt'i.,::,E:-.::-. -t."11.401•00047 IlttOVA.-iiitUtes:Ackt:,-‘„4,!ti„t4-- ''i' i-A;''&•=.:,,M,P..-::''": i :,,,:qtAkrii-PA!':,..T.,, :,--`-'-',.'v'N.Akifoo'%--.':',,-,',- '''',-.R' 0--..,::Ill > ,,,-':;:r7,•41.0;fgr•-;:!. i:Agyiler.7-:.:-_ ,..-:-..4,-.01-It.7,',T,,-.AW,--,3 ::--.-.:":-,--- . -',7,..:H.,:-:p'k::-„,-g.r. ,, \ . \ 0 -1.V"4- 40:1-W:- ' -- -,"----4113,MWORFAII:404.1.41,KR.Ver-:: S' :.---_. -'I --_, ''.-: --.'i-1- ,'''::6,.!.---::;,•-.2;-., -,. \ • ..._, ,:,34,41,0,:,„,:... .. • . w...,••=•, ,,,140:0:,,. ..,,,,,, •,.,_ • a .,...R''' ','''''''': -.:::"''" -, ., ., ,-_ ,. \ \ \\ NA00.9e0VitgV.Ra ..A..: -- ,-::?!..,'7,:: . . ._ . 44 .., ,,,,,, .„,.. ..,..,... .z,„,,,,,,,s,„.„0.4,,,,,,,,t4s,,i;U::--,-,453Mtge•zt.,,"":,:te -44 t-,.,t4,-,,z_-,-- -„. -- --"„t„...,..„-„,„.,,,,...,.. r . •_, T \ \ \ \ \ • -- •"4:,, _.,,„,.-' .,,„.„Mtt:t;t'',t;,"„-,T::,:-X.,..'-- ,,:t",t,qtkt'4',;sok;'wgstt,'-pttykX-'t'.e,eqt'tgttt,tVt44k,:,,,-k,t,,A.,IIIII 1 1 ,J \ ' IiMNi,,v,,,,,,.P.4„,K,,i1,:l,l6;a':,%.!.'t-';I'44,.'?,TAr:,,,*;,,,.,,-,1•T;.t,-,,:t:i..-„:.:-...,:,i,,,,.,,:. 0404045ggelIFOVW:-7 ' -'. .-,.... ',' 1, + „ \ 1 I 1 \ I , I N„ I ' t ' . • --,38.- , ...._. I \ 1 ' i , / --- 1 1 . , 4 • • .1 • ... I , • ..... • • • • • f• ,\ l' ,,..,... ' 1 „ \ J-----—--••----•4-----------.------------T--1 ....---- . L__.; ' , ---_,\__---- / • _ 4_, ___ _ _ \I--- • - — _ "---__— ---:_ -- 1 I \\ I ---I -— \ - I I .., I . , -\ 2 / ... i --, - -7: I \ \ , ---. -----> I ,__1 ,-. / ..., / 7 \ • ,,:::: I . ------- I / .so -_ - / \ ..7 --I I , --_ I - \ -- I 'so, /_ •-• . . I -- \ ..., I ______ • ---, •-., •. / ,—,, ... \ \ . / 7• _./K ---. \ - 1 ___,----- — --- ------ , -- - I --,- \ t\.,10111 Ikkg#0,0„ _ i—-—- .1,__.owl, 1 -- -----. 1 • -, \ ‘,-.••• \PP . L____.,.. .._•...„.„ , , 110,,, , --- i 1111111111,11 I ,16.41 1 vi - , .._, , •_, , , —,,Ar- ----, , , • \-_-_-__.......-- . 1 -----,_ .\<, •....__ ,„„, ,..,\, ... , , 1_ _ • _ _ I_ _ _ _ . 1_ _ _ _ . _ _ _ __:--_-___7.: ___ • _ \7_-__NI.:--iti ..-.-- , ........._ — L 1 1 ..,..... ...._ ,.. • •>>61. \ \ \ .41°7 -' \ II _ -___ . ,.. 1.... ---•"".44100\ \, ...---' ,447:4, , \ ,---- ..---' L -- , N -..• , -tr. • . 41. _=÷1::..,../)..,,ii • .,....:..„ =r , — — -•,,l'ttif-,rt-,.. ,41,',";:,;,.:'.',..'.„t,.-,:,,,:;:,;;;:-",-.--„-,; .',.-/,,,:.,'"-,..-,,.'"..::!:,.,:::,,,,..-;e*,,.'. -''. is' --:.-i':"'7.C14'4,4;:,::'';''',' ' . '"i•i: .' O 1; O w Oil --- __- '-c- -- 0 \ r — — -T'"'._ IfililigilliiiIIIIIIIIIIIP: 11k i.,,,rei:ki!T..:„!-':',.„: ,r7i.::.?‘:,,,:r....,1,,,:;,.,.;:ji,rea,...!'",,,;\,:;;;LS5:::41,2",,,s,,i,,1 I 1 , E ,; i ' 1 H 41111111111111h \ II 1 ° ° --, —0 ° „ ..,,,,,,...,*fr„-, -.,:,--- -rg,--tramml J ._ .� � \ \ 1 /\ I - c 3 e� 1�'v A 1 ✓ S \\ ` ` r- ainimi ........,.. _. ____ ,..'23t,---:%,,,.:-,2.-,.-1 evgjg.,,,,,i,4,,,,:wi . 1 S N Ti N N `{Yi:,,,,,i: IS„a- \ 1\ I = I ,4,,,-, ,NA N \W O I !i4 -- kt iii 11.1 /\ \'!!!!!;A;'';;!!! !!;'' ,':-!-4'..,!!4!''' \ -0 rn ,, , I \ vv - '17 omni' i C j ij \\ \ _, 1 -"'fix nyw-„} 9 , \ \ -r; ..\';,_.... -:77:-.7.777,.:7,\.-:,.;,.:':4;1:A;',..1-`,:.,-.,,'1,,,I,';';',;:Vri!' -';'-',..--...:-f:t'':-',.: 6:*74;e1,4LIN*.,..i B[10 {.� 4 7 F Y Y)f P3 7 .1 rte f �`\ \ �, �-,. F �". 1ll a_. Mii .'f;Yee a@a ` •"'^^...._-___ / rif=w 4. :�mifri-*.tri : -,-,....,-,-..,,,..:!..,,,,,,,s,.:•-„, a - a e i e s x,'-' "" -�.. ,h .�' I / \` 1 ...„.„.1_,.,..„Ail. ,,,....x_,3.0. ..,41. „..‘ 3,:„...,....„..„ , .. ,., t! _.,,,„5.. . ..... , _., - -.4.....:: 7.:4,...._,....4 .1.-..„...,3,....„.p.,,„.„._ _,.,.t,,,,E....a..... : . :?.-,-.1-= ..4.,„„:::;!!, ..„.4 I I �0_ � I . /r \\r1 `1 \,. . . . r - ; I ; 1 / _i / \ / I I 1\\" },• px I . j 30 I I Q I i ..... t _ II I ,, I �— _ , .„...... 1� __ 4114, I i t I ' IIi �j� I I 1 I i . ,� / \ \ V � i I I ` _ I I _ IIJ / / \ Ii _ - -�` ''` 40-- -1� \ _-� „f 1 `a \ -- \-r,-,41 _ ___, , ,. ....7, I '� \ - AilO \f\! ."- �� I - __---\- 41 1 I 1 I -A�- \'\'' \ 0 �, 1 \ 1I 1 1 • 1 -w� 1 1 \ _ __ ____ _ - _ I_ _ _ _ i_ _ _ _ 1_ _ _ _ _ _ - - ------_-z- -_-\ - \- - .--,-,..._ v �►, 1 1 1 I I - tea. \ — — — -�_ ��� 1 I 1„\ \�\ v '" ,c467::,�� \ 0 il / \ ...r' • \\ r , tri o N \ — \ � — — \ — N p \ — \ — ,0411 r. to. ------.•••••_k_.______ Mix N / _ 1 11 r = � 1 \ I I . \ \ D I \ -111-i\'-,‘ ` _ 7� I \� e.fro t \\ 1 1 \\ � : ,� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - � - - - - : - - 1101 I K C Y I - r e St ter.. A r n Li .£�• / \\ nnoiligurr \ l .tv,,,,w.,,,,...,„:.,,,...,...,. ..:.,_._, ,..,„... .,. ..,„:„:„:„....,,,,,„....,„,,.„,,,,; 1 _,„.„,,,.,,,,:,„,,,.ao. :..... .4--.444.. - ,'. :-i.-_----. --.'.'-'' ' •,-'-,----56','0'''' - \ \f I � m ,\ \ \ C3 \ a \ N ` y.. — f V:5;7:074 ,u Via' ��''m w a -`"_' ��`�'-- I I ror r.t : s . dE�ds . .✓X li„.„f ^_ ..�,, «y 1���- ,.n4£G ll of x N„a '0....' ''*,' P / g.,.•19:7:,-,,,,,4_,,,z,;.; *,,.In 4,* • N. . ;,-1.:.;4.--„4*.- , a N.,,:` z 1-.: -4 / ' .-- r` a rr ";. _ ste - f r74‘..W_ 1 h ',C. m � „,;;;II s / ” ` � yf - v '.rte ax . - s /---di 'y,Y� ,�,x�,00"� s"'"'in§i s / �'^' �-�”.._` / 1 +.�.1 ..r. .., fy ma0 '�e s✓=affi / ..`+-.. -y N,,,.., t.s.s.,,I,r,,, R. psy .4s--.%:t-R!,, - - - • ktc., .„,,, - i., -,P'-.-,,..a.... , ___ , -.%,, ,.. . .4-,,,,,, . .7-____„ith t',..,,aa ,,,.,-;----;--- ---41., 1 r \\\„,,,r 1 :. 1 . MO”-- . g --'-i Nig mai R. 1 : . — o..1:...;,.,1-.Af.:0i,:,... ,,:71-34= --- , - ' No, ' ' .a.-. 11111111k., I __ ___L___... , .... \ i, 1,1 , _ , 1, .— , , , \ \ , ,..... , 1 , _ 0 ___,,,_ ,,,, , , N ,, --,.._. \ '.----- \ . _. i a. N., \, , , , , ___ , ___ , _ _ or4ft \ ...., .i.,..... ___ 1 _._, - 1 \ \ .1_ 0_____ _..... 1 ,, T . \ , \ _ 1, t, 1 , ._- '' - \, •' \ 6'.--- _41. \ \ 1 I l ►I 1-�, , _ -\--‹ ve..,......44% \--, ,\ 1 -I 1 I ; I iw�" I I - _ \- --too .A0Itt -- % /'-- - t I .--- \ , . Akik 41 /0\ \ I - I a� a�JJ w x ,w n,T O r--/ / \\ m o , as N \\ ' — 'c O N 1 1 c., [1\ - 4LiKji -\I .7----( i �.i N \ n\\ D - \ I r tx x ` r 1 cio \1 pk 0 N. 0 I '--�� II \ . I \11 111 r70 -11i ,�� _ \ - , p \` `, I a \NN \�\\. N, `\ I I J `. \ \ \ \, ——_______ 4 \ -,_____-_\,. ____ .Firi E , ,,,___________7 .`� ---.„-r. ^ mss, #�'"x�c ^,��«' a5. s K 5'.. �.%t,_ 4111.2!) ril ��.� 1 1---'1 Fr -:C ' a "" N:, n*r�' i�u T r '.:u °`w2 / \` , - - - - — l :r / olooil ,, I .' - ., stx,,,,,-%",,;,.: , , / --. „paggit '>\ 1.-,,. r,-;m; ft:s N , , , , ,NIBTAk , NV ,e4t, 'I / N..N. --=- — r. L }_� \ / // 4,`.'`._.' \ \/ `--` `/� —# '` ---1 \ I ._�� I ._,:��^, i I 0.400vd \ \ ' \--<.,10,00,/,' _ I I 0,...".4‘ I�Iii �1 \ \ _ ____ _ _, 1 ,, ..,...;104 1 • =,Jl . : ,: .''..‘, ..;,.,„11,,,,,,,: , :. :. :,. ,. ,» ,r; -.-. .,, � :s? � .77-t.'N �L4 *,V:' L sem .; �'z'>z .?4' ";. :sr-+'v. 4,--< .,�; a . ,� �`+ ;,s «s .....fy�.m i,. ♦ � � r:, r'-'''''71:'''-'-'''I'';''''"?:?:''''-:- c �z, `Zx � �'�'�,=L'...� nr �� s�.�r '�.y»:. i V I ; 0 __,, - ; -3 \, , ,..„ r... ID. r N . — `, KC J \ IXI ,, ) ,1 I �. \\ \ L. N. 1 / ( I — I - \ \( .... \ _____. 7_._.--rc-j ° H 1 , - } ` • CD \ > \ , I \• e I O7 \`\ I . , -PIM ,\ J 0 \._ \- D------) .,, __ \ -, \, _..... ,_,, u . ----C. 0 = O 1 4. 0 % \ p-____21 .. \ \ ----N \ I 1_..-2 > • N ________,,, 1 �� �IIIIIIII �� �\ �^� �� 1 , _ \ ._:._,, _____ ..<y r - ?'tv:a,,4rJIL�rp� ... -4-0— — / v //441 ,i • galW Al I •-'.--744'-'357-4 ---/ I m �_..�1.0.-y / / \ \ \ ______.401\\ I ''' — --- — :-.6----- 1? --7-•'—gi''-':: :-'n':- / -, --, \----;---- - .4tfir i1111 =� fir — `' � / \ \ _., T ____ \ / / ,_____ ___ ,_„.„ N..,,\ \ ;04,---- At‘------____\-- „ \v,-- ___7c-- 1,... T ---_,____,, - - 11 - -1 ''''------. . q-- ,_...---pril . --II 1 1-16*-7Aii ilirli 1 h , I A101 il I N. ', i .._ , \P' __ •- , Nvo. _. -,.:4- A\ ...-,.. \ '-et° . ---,.. ,,, ,, iik '\<.VO 011.4%\ II 1 II -- --s sc.---41 frAl I, \ L -- -- '-0/ i" \ fin Lip ,:,:.,.:,.,,-;;.:„.,..5,....,,,4,„v C ^rt,x 4�,s."-k h54x+ .tL _g.' ye ;,;,--,::', .,...=-:':.i.: � r ei i � n, 5 * ,....z:.„-,..',.5:,,e.:., I 'vr ,� , *. "� au � ' :¢�H`Gs r, k,a� �vv i ��yr ~- a �a z°Jz �'#',s , , «.R 4 ,.:r " 2 � 3' f.k w y�=> 1 C3 „_:\ r i \ W ` ) \ `� o ' — — N \N — — --- •1 _�--I < ---I J 1 IN I i N ;-, ' I \ . ,i `N \ 1 I 1 } \ \ I \ ED 1 i \• \ I 1 \ \\\.i\\ It i1 D ( 1 ( 1 \\ ` 11 I 0 i Oi ' — , \\ 1 . , IllikO � 0 11 , (---- D � ioV \ ,, \ \ „ > , = D DD - 0 i\i, o . . \ „ 0 /.._ \ ,, ,, \ \ ..._..... , , , \„ _.... I . , 1 I ', v 1J__, `\ \ \\ N._ I \ , I KIN 7-% I _ �' I �� � � }� _.. -,_ # Zak- `.''. /� r s ,u ,+-” ' 3..�'a y-' c.- -'s et. -;...;,i_ ;;s I / 1.N` 1 1 � v f 1 - - - - , - - - - - 1 - -ri - -� - — — — _ — I / / / I ` —_— \ / 4 riiiiki I _�� r / I 1 ./ = Air ', � � /l �� i� iN ce\ \� Li& 7":;--- I _ f /�` \ - Il Illim_mi L76,—,1 ri67,7-4p,--—1-11101rAl li --, „0.040‘ — _ _____.\\ I I 01" ill I I II1iSJIkNNN'N A \ ..,� \ s,;� ,�s >� �� � ,..., :' , ..r.. ' , :w „,:Ya , '...,,- — \7— -1,011,,, .4111_,-A-- — - 1 • 1 1 _ , \ \4"-__- \ ,,,„---1 1 __ 1 L__ _ _ _______ 1 _......„....-_....ton Q-- . ,-, -two\ „ -----004 \ 1 - __. ... 1 L- \ ,,5 F A . :-; E^ .�: ,.. ”": r, „,,,4,„i,..4...,-..�<. r.,.. .. ,..a. f : .� .-.,,,.,,,.,:,-,ti, 7.,,, -,,,.!,;'';',..j:,!.--,. ' ' . k .5^ � .2x"'' ,w .., ... J'..+. .. .:.: - hx,.{ .. ,s..y yh.,.F', ., ,.. •.,., ., . "Y .fit e� ,.. : . ..,.::t* .i . < .. ., ,...,.+c,'... - .¢-,., 3i R^ R: "S r; ¢T' a .<..e. �.,,,. � ...., . sz :o:. .,i• ,. ,..�R ��� ,:, .,., �... n ,ld .+*,n a '.aa Kf'. s� .�. ‘;,,,t-,-;,',4:',.::- us ., . ,;'''' ,.. . .s_. i ,:. . o� - ..:” 9`r i2.:+;,,-- -, 't•t«.i ,t,y .;6 '+ rz vy �t P'- `.^-" ;Y.,,v:�" sK Xi �,_ r �, + w -4.''''="'N:`-',:."','' �:. � "''''''"''''I''''''''''''''' ..«�' ra, '1 4..�: �y�'fi � . . . . • • . . • • • . • - is I . • . •- . .' '''.i;•.• - • - . -.*:t ' ''• • .,,•?,!-' 4,,,,. ';,'''''', .1 ..!! • .• 1... • • L ' - t'-'...'S.''.i"*.-..-V,..• 4! .. .-t 1-',WC! • i - ....-. .•,. . . _.„..-' . . . ' . . > • ,i,„. ..„,,,,-, „..,„ ,,,,„... ,:l.,:!. ..,,, , . ...,..,-..'„4,•0,, -,.. -.....,..vi,.,...,,-,.. ,.. - •,4,-:_,,,,..,-:', ' m . ,‘...,..„...., ,...., • . . . : m 0,74,6 ..• .• • . . . . --1 m ..• .. -,,:,..,,., _..,.. ,..,,,,,,,,..,. ..,-.vm,,-„Ags,,,, i • ••.:''-';',,' 7 4t....:,,.:'.:-1.1-1/;,,,,s,.10:4 ':4,--,:,;':,-*-' 1/4"\:.-?..- - ; . • r—m :,.. ,,..., -, ir.,,,, ..,,,,,. ,,.. i •ii;rtIgi.. ' ' . (.,,,,,,f,..—%-,,...., , f.!,6, t... kYk.-It-zit?-.Ar• . ,,.....,,:‘„,-. =1;-.. -.;..,L 4•.;.,1,,,,)r),..a..:4•'.:',:s. , 1 . — t - — m IT1 )* I t-?,..e ...,181*, .v.N , 1 14:14.! 1'1.1" V , .,' f :. •• '..;•..f 1 ticAc..-rkix=1...;, 4 t„-,ii„,24, .II I* i ,- . I f Ii'. 4dirS) l'ri4 . . . .• _ —I - -",--f'',:v1,1r.A),..'- •'I i".lim ' M i • ' .:.. ._ . , 0 a 0 . 1/4., , . -.• . . • ,8 lei,V. -n',...... ,', .. ..• 1 ' -. I.-, —.7 •• .I n,,,11,-, • .. . - .' ' " ,' ' ''' 1- •Vr,.; Vt,' •' ....--... .,...4;114.••••-.7.,.44%;1 'o.fr!.pikl !,,tij.; u U a tr, , e.— ..•:',...1. i':Iiiii:d 10 . - -. . . • Z . --. . •,4,f-it. 4 d Ile' ii.„ a 451 it„.1 , , . ....i,... y;r7,..it 1,4 • .:. .......-1 ''.; '','t 'i :1 ,‘'.5.-. ,,i. ' - gj'.• 4; '- • r.• .... , .,•.•,,: •., t.,L,c- .., 11.r..:.,, . ,,4 i - -,.'S ,i, • t . . . :-. • t ti e• „ -- . . 1,;: , . . 0 --,.,, , 1,,. ,._ 4.,-.11 I'••,IP•t,:;:ii. - 14 ,Ati • -6 i'.-- . A 17, i. •i:Lt'‘.'...L . -•. `t' ".;*k, .. i 't,'.:t..,1J,1 aSt.71'•„...;.1,, It f,, i.'. ( '.,544 Il .I .. -',-,*p. '`'••: (14'‘i;t.1 .,'fiZ' `'"11 .r.1 g:. ' i • . titlt 111 - 1:-,-. -. - . • . - . --I t , -46 r, ri•i:••'.- F.P's•4" .A. .1 ), .,,,, 'Ai .X X '• ,4• . . . •-, > ''Kt .V, 4,;,',3••••== f ,&It iiRA ,1 , _. ----•-1, ' ---' , — - A ski- S-4 n, -'''„., , • ••i .r - - ..•.;..,,,, .itty, •it4. I:Km:1;11:qt t.1 ' ' , . la ., • • '....: 3,,-4 ,`..if'...,4 'i • •••.,:ik. I4. " L'; -`tli.-a; t-r,: - - - ..w4.1 , • • :11411' IX E 111-- Iti,4, 1", 1.•N't - ;-1 ,'-'' kl.11('•-••,-i!.= - -- .if:ili ''' t ';:.'.I?.&-- •'''.:".l'iPti'i:Llt. III; *in 1;'.% '' '. 1.::::f..' c.tri 11 .k,•-,' ' . t, .1/4.,.. .) 1 e•-f -4 , 111 ".i• ) '---''''-: t "'I- , ii nli! . - ) 1' -y • irk/.1 ftri, pl#=,- .- 3.4 V .11. II .1 • — :1, ,",rf4 S .:.417:-. -.05ftt• A,' `-...'1';IL ,.c.:,- t l'.,t'L., '.'...`: •;.-1,1 ,-......-41 F'4!:° -,,.•iz . , 1 .4., ,.. •...rTip ........ . .. . 5' — ....••I ii,,-v.it.,, ‘,.!1,11i45..; ,,:-:Iti,;-•.... n , 11.,4,i.,:t.-:. ..., ..t.--.1g..r,,,-.-ii,, ,.:.!.,,.-xic..-_:'•-,t• it,,7-e-.,M; tif_,Ovali•Ii;,E.II -,, ,„ -. .„...„. Li Itri.---- „ 1,..4.,.., ,...„.,:,.., ,i.11„,„i f• ) .1:..:61,kitrpe,,!.r..• zeg 41 1 . t , .... .. . . :;',-..',, ? Ifl•'.'iwt,1 ig lii°11'..• • 1 .... 0.. ''''''4.''-4-L'1' s;11111•L:'-'#:' eiO4.4.M.: ”--!:,'-, ). 1 ,•-*••,, 2 -..i'1f.0 ...4;; 1..1.,. It 2 lT . r1 i1 ;!,'..!1,"i.li:i`,:!,:,.--*;•;:'::'. 1 .4 Ci'•Yi5",-,:k '.,.1_,-."5:'4i,.• Litiffil 0 0 '.i, : . • •-•1.,..,1 .--....4.,...i... :....; ;1„1..1171:Iff.0, i • it::::F,11'1',,,i ;17 1011,7,2, '7-m,,,;;III„ , . ilI; ili,,; .(+, 1 i_ 4‘1,421. .. : i; r-.Z1 1 'I'1 -'' '1 1.4.1r• 4, _F:4- I 11•4.it--, 's* ""'' 1th • .,-.•1-1.00%. '.,, : .... .. ••lei •• j;- • : :...,,-,..i...• 1... f•-..i •• 1 le iii +, ••,. , 4100' . 1g1.1:0=:-.-:I I - 1 ---„`r..,t,it am, ' . ; •—• ;•t- unt.i. ,, .. ., 1 ..:.1k ..., -,,,.,••,, -.. ,,,•,, -,, 11.4.*_`-:•.•Vet;t(-;:''''',-=,:t* 'tkt!Alai *is ft w' ;" --7,t,r4t,.;ri;•-•;:i,,,-- 1——--1 ror 11 • ',-•,, %., _ iv I" y. 1':-v.',\6:7!,-*..• ,--1•:....,.--.:-II -,',1j4111.Vi , i - •:7-,,,•• r t% ". 1 X . r i I. I y . I; ?•,.,!.t.:.:,!...... e..",e.:,.', ,,.:;•,4‘N*'• *'•- ,t I 2111'11 'ut:rit:11.-; t. 't':.; '`.e 1 I I , **,'''A" .,,...t,' ej '*-11'..11,7" '1.,.. ,11.*'',i . %St ig , ,,t iTh• -6 ••••'', 'I.t.4? I il% .. I rsit"'i 14.wt. 24 1,4' -.31A, I.' .• 77,filt-.. -t1 :-== A": ' Yi, lit 1 litatX3 1,4 i , 1 1 ,,, 1... • _ ._ 0. . •k,„,: • v - t , T . -..:. .,,, , ,,..._,„1, , ,,..%.,,- tit . '-' 1 , iltl-s4 1 •-. ,.„ -::'ijaLtitiSii7,-'2;';._--;..:---='. ". i 4:1, E.-, i' i-'''')- r , 1 -ti-A -‘5:.... 1 t, . • ' -' .,..tzrgami,, . ,•• „; .... .....,14:,. :.1..„1,1,,... .... ..trt fi '''‘'.' ---•.. .'•:.f, - - I .11? ').. .. :• ,---'' ,,., ; ;,7, Zt 14;' 1..i;Jit,,ii !'.=.1'.=:'-',./ I 4. .I• . 'iligl f.;,,If ;;,*,..7.,•.:41,1 ,,...:•-,,I,'. 117•;;;J:i -: ;,.., ,•• .-,.... i." - .V.1. 174—g?fri)\ `- ...1 . , t • 1 _..-4;i...,.../ (1,. ,, - 1 '.-:- ' 1 loiti...;,- •. .' ,-...1 1.r. -, . -1=1;relk:: .1111f I • ' i i .1-,- ::,-?- I ijenl', 'r.'7' 1 •.'3!,iLlt. ..--/--, -.. ' - ':" LILL !-..,,i-f.-,..ver• ' --.7•.7-.i t.., 't!:.f ktit t;0*.i.•••.,, L' ,, ..... 41W 1..1 1.;.• 1 i''.I.• •••. '. ' .•-v, , -..\,` • - w-i.=, : - -i.--,, t\ ;:‘,..••••fs....i.,,,,,11., --.'"- --ii4'' ' 1 ... .C/) -;*)t1 i' :'t ::'-'-`- ,.:-:.. . i './ii.. • . 1 .... - 2,. ,,,-n• -.-. .42' •:' .:;;‘,••••*tf-' -•• •• . m - ,*:.', ,'I',,i• ''-**1Z.F4T-4:1 : l . '-.-?•-''''-1. .!; lipt•,-4._‘--*'*- ' ,.‘ t.,..i'‘4,10161.*:.1"1•)?:-- fili,-iti.-44.:\::-,... , -•-•,.'.;L.:7.7:. , ,,vN Mrr:12 . ",•.:•. .. .1,_ ,..:„1„.• , • . _.<... ,...-‘,.,..2 --1' . .,,,t,.....,14. 7.,,...,•-•,..- ,- .; 4.4;4,,•::: ',,,...„_ef ..1*! --I ......,,!,..- i .., •-•:%•,,tr,,rtfp..t.'1.f2;,,,,''',';',-.- t. 1 ..•- '•',,'-;,'ki? ;1-1 - •;,=••'-''..:-..i•..- ' .---"' c -41.!.. -. ;It'Z'', .. ' 0.. . ..; L .-.4.,'',•>. , ., / .; . ,-.. 4: .,..'.-;4":'. ,. -, f) ''',;1•.• ' Z • -, _ . ,-,.• , , • •,.*•t.. ..,1,4-; -*:..:**:';''•,.'';-t ''.. ;-..., ,...!, 4.•.•.':'4-'(.41;tiV-7''''-tv ,'`,Zii ?‘ . .. ''"''4,.""LitV•,'",, ••J '.2..,-''t': 'Z'*°1‘'‘-'''-',,;•,:'`.,',..;'''''' . , -:•; ck- ' ,..- `,-'''' ':...;•—,c.,7•„;,?' ',4:-:,.. . ',."...•.'. . • .' 'S •-•-••• n, ,;,..,-_ ...1qy t•-_,:: . .;.,,-,:,..--'11,i\%.,;,•, ...,,,,,,,._ , : „E,...„. I. c--,-, :-:- ,lkt. .,,,....;,, ,••,, ';.',". • —e ...--...±-,/,,:/), ...i. ,-- .........-._„: =S • _,. - --- - - •*-- .-,,i, .'•-••--"*'•••.•4 •• ,..,:•,,,••: •4.,.,,,';‘,,' ••:',4.-,;4o.,,-••••;•,•-4:::,',,,,,,I.,,;..,-;;;,,,,,-•.s_'•-'' ,•,•••-,,":1'`'AP 4. - - ' - ''t.''. 1.•_-_;,;',,,-:','•-••••' •'-'•, "',•••-•''''•:•,•,' `,eg•;,•••7:,",A'',:"..',-,i,..,:',-.,,,, --",z,',,,,",..-,,,c.,,,,,,„".,‘ - '- , - m . , A . .,.. . .. , 4`,,,.-;.•.--•""'•..:":"-4.• - . ... L.. •• . .•.,,,• sp,...upp,.... ... ,,....- . . . , • . ..• ,10"Pts"*.- •' ''... .:!•.,',,,- •i > :. .ii.41,-"" , . m ' . ..:'.',..'-....'• li! ,, ----* ... .. . H • - ' ' H . ,...::::.:t't 1,1014W_ • r :.:::'.. .,I. ' • ' . , , m ' ' -. i 1-. . m ,• ..• ' ••• - • 1--- ••:' -=1.74‘ -'4;44',.: • - - lit . - - .i M -l.... . 1.7.•::-..\\;.....„,;:.,. m • -,,,-.',.::•-,.'ft„ . 1 > '.:2•! {7-‘,. .‘!‘)''.....:; . < .•.'..•. :e.-tit > • '. —I ,', l'eti4.:--2-,_• —1 ' -•:, 03 • .• .,... ....- 0 . .. . . 1-7 -.=.4* );', .• . 0 Z :, 1 .1 ...„, kit, ,- 1 , .. )1, Z . . 11''N Et • - 1 ,. , ,',.ii 011 ..,i,i . •f 1 . , . •. '..''..41, I , .. {.,H ff r• L.1 •.. , . ... _ ..... . • - ME; ,Witi t.IN,',.• - I, i,p.; flit Fr .;',•1-•'' ....4. '•'--Wit . , .1 i si„:.•.;•,, sown -- , Ng. .. ,, I it, -• 1 I p , ill""•1 1 p 1: ! •...• ,upg• ',1,:•i. • . :,=•"ti. ••:,111111.11 ' it r -.3 ,I , .. ,......0 1 F. 7 tt•ta 4 .I- . •• .„-••., — ' - •'ciii"'!•1 aklut. - i 1ji 1 ::. ('h. It7iiiiill -:::-... . • 15 t,,0•• 1 1' . -,..-.....„. • • Ef5ii-,-\?).---i-,....it:-..;. •.:.. • . if ,;. *i.:1' Eiti At'i •• - - . LIN.1'.•'.:-,1,7 It.'..' ' . . ' --,,.i -- . ,• ',,e'r,‘ ; 4 f.r.ficit,,,. . ...• ..- .• • -.,-,imiv. tc,,,:.,—*„.., !,:,..... . . ..,,...„,,. .. ..: *,. -,, : ..—,:-....,-..-'-.....c,.., ..,.... ... ,.7; . ..-....; . ...:',, • ‘ ''.."-..'. •.' ' . q -. ..,,. ....::-, .- ;-;:-.,,- ii•kvik,..nr,s ..4-I.I..t •.-•,,, ....- . , •••'"'",•'‘71,2',-, ir/s ii""-. "•••••"••,:.•••„, -... *.,..; :',rt'Vq:•';11'iikr i...tii•-',:- .v.• .- ,t•-•_.:v.,.-'0 !. •,")..g•.:,....‘,.„,,,, , __... .. • ': IL.X. - ..J.....t.... .' P.I.."". • '-: ii. • -: i 41._ ,, •. • 1 . ....., ---'1 .' ir..:.1,1„,,.„..- ,• ),4. , - • , "- .1 ' -, • . . t '1*...1 rrIV 4.1-...I". . 1. ‘.' I i.. -:„.„ -.:„....ii 1 If, 0‘,-.1,.,...!,;....-• ......,...„,„ . '•-tl ,,':-.0'111',0 '1 ,:....ti-•-4:,,-4/' • . ,•.- ,,..,-,, ,• ..,,, . 'd -4 .i- tilbl'ilc .1/4, . . f A -, - ........ t...4.-, ..f.-.5......,_„"-- • , ' / - • • -•". •• * pi ,")•,.-11:1•1 r",,,,,,'••••••,. „,...•••• - - - .•11,•;;, ,,,•z., ,,,..-•,,,•;:„ •••t- " .'• t!..• . ,! 1112:421i Ap:.AL.• '' - ... ,p' •.il.''4'•'••`-• - •.• ,„ iPjg, 1, •. ;,;•••,-"-iti.\'',.:•''-,.•,........4,... ' :. , 411gr,....• .44;:fit•• `II;.• ,•,;- .....4 ",:...:._ •-. r '; '‘fi ..t*., If k-%:....*:,.,./,..-: : .-.4... • . .N., .i. :,.11.,,..i:1/4brht#4.,....1vW,-..\--7,-.,,,N. .,p.‘, . .t,•,,i- • •, --------,t,L.,......,:.•....T.-;e..,..- ,., ,....,.. ' ft' §,. s,....s....„, ,.-: t..311flt..4*- 1:.. --- . • ,,,,,...al., il'i a• .!_,.....„,,,, -.".' ''-'7:111.Vi.-Iti'lli'?'?./".411..W. .4-ii.i !•41 k • '' 1 14414-41i:iff . r;i:11"'"7". .: • t.r. . .'''''.- . ti ; ,' -‘-'• ••-e, .,. ,-,!, .E1 -, ,:l ,r, ': f- - ." , :, 5?•,,' •I:1 1.' ;!;:' pi ,•''',,,,......3..1 , • • ',.t • . :-.!1;t - •7 ''...". S., , if...,i . ., ri a .: '.1 .1;4.1-'.':,...1 ..:....,,,,,-,:,,,:'., $lif...t...*,14:1431.1r:2' -,.,- 'it*V: l ., ;:.'.. 0 . '','.., Ift....../ai..itleak..11111 .4 r.-f" ...- , '..7;'': ... --.4hillit',114:; .:1;V:1'. . . 4 111:Ntiiiii''''''''''''':/r . ' ........, ' .-2:.'t'0' 14 ., -I • 111.--:;:-.ii.1.-. ,.. r,- ''. _ T..---',-• •',341,,--.:_i:Ili,--0,4 li,'. . r 1 4-•-• ' , ' •:- ' ...-"t4 1:::Z1 . ...:• . • .. - ''.1 • . -- • .;.-• -' .V.i. itti,-,Iri-14‘,.11 IF-•7: '-' 11- -- --- .!•4..'4-.4,.tir".2u: :::,-,, , ii .,, .;41, - -•- . ., „,:. • -•:1,.. -1! '.1 II) •- !.- ..74.` ..-- • ''''\I 4. i '11 i,11: L" f-'4.1:'1. ..„. : _ .-..._ -t, '1 `Alis'r411t.i.,'ME:11'. . v) 1, .:. - - .-- .- ,.. ., .11 ; .-• ..-- .-- - —1 -f., ). -1 .,r,..0.:44.' ,.'.,•,..t-:..-..-::.. . . . . - , . .:-.. ...-. - .11-k-..1,-.:,-v- - •'- •- . : • m _ . ,. ,4...,i ----1 ----i ...•IN's."..L-- • • ".- M -. • 'i -' '.•° • I 1 Iktt 'h . .'''''''' ' .• •''' :.2. .1 . ....., ;-....i...,i , • • „, ,T.,, ..,,e,.....: ",..,:,._, ...,,,,,J...-L-,•.--- . ' ' •- - - rn ,••• •• l• :,•-.•.:-..- •••,i,.. '"-.,,r...t•tt:542.-,!.-• :. ' - '-: - ......,‹ _ ',---:. . .;•••c. ::-•:.:....;,;:i -; "••';'•ic.',•.'"'•••,•• ..•••.- •-f -- .11"" ,1110.--- ..,., ......../.1.........„....; ,,,,,,,s.,„,,.5„,, .,.:2...,.:.::::,-;.-...- - •-• 4 .....if -- . , ,..,,. ,. 4 ,,,`:.:', ,,,-:,',., . :1'..),;?,+; i • -.-... . - 0 .. - - .-- e.-- ,..---, -,..,,....-",c-:-; -..-:-....: !i- ',-• ••',,„ '',‘ ,•., ,rVIN.,,,, --,-=,,-1-• .. ....-.. -.. . Z (I) f.'2.'1.. if. - • :' ''f.`• ...14i L:',07..i'lliti "",,,-;,''':'•...• '', :'-'. ..., - -. -.... . )1)N ti . . ... . ... ;.• . ,. .... . , --- F.) --.-....,,..," , ----- --. = .... __.. ...... • . Aanwscwasawax.r...0.-,...ar..7.7m... ..i......- --....,-.. , -.•.- -.-.--,- .....,--7,..--T.- ---....4—..._-.........-...--,-....... ,- ' .' ','1,'-.-•':,F,',;,:',,,,..,'?-:,,,'",,,,e77',,f;,,-;.'',:..,..,,;-,;,,,:V:,!„.:::IfF,':?::'_,''''!''''Ll',..'Csy fkr,:1,18:',':,,,_;,1;:.,,,,"'.:.',..:'.. '_,..'3,' ''',`'.',..,,:'`---.:,',,,,,,.;:i':le':::4:'..-'.,q,,,;,:: ,.......- -' r r-' ,'. -."- ',''..,..'L.',r,,,,, ;% ,'''-..‘:,'rj:.1-:'' ''IF,,..,..,..?:.'., '''''''''':'%';•;'::.n..'',''''*:5,';'?"4':'''',7L....,,'":'.:R4.''',.':::'.2%-.:.:.-'3•T"':,:,,L,..':;.:,1';`,..,;(n-r-'''''''., .,'7'.,,,i-,-',"--'-;',..'''''.., mCJ) m m O O zz 0 0 ii 0 0 4 z m O D z C) \ C < 1 z C m Q = Z ° .-.---: a m :,:- 1-':-: :',.:.:.:.-1.:: ,H.H -„:'I .., ,.., „,,, i ... ._i..;::.., ...,„,„, \ \ • Z C) '' r .' "i\ f3 ` g:::','::.::,1.1i'',... '''..1;1.:1-1...',i::,'- / '' '''' j'. IkW / a Y /i YNn ',At/ y ti y '� ; %i .r Mgt' M r it x ,�ff ? / +rJ RNs l?: Y. ,., ''''''' .„,r„.„. , .. , . ,,,.. .. i , , !„.„, ,... ,,,,,..1 w {( w R "ityn a H _ r m . . -- \\.:„. ., Z 3 DZ p C .r \ Zm 44, -I ; tj'441 D n m C-' m Z m m 0 Zz o � W %�l y -�.,:" �xsF c ..Cr ;; "'` �,. F.r 1p — 'v r :. i 'i.r sr'=t ` '`,r�, k wa•..xb �, r:. �-4 fe t,:4 ,f� rTl m .4 w� ' °' }F{sj lj (�\J `'�+: ^ .........1;..., Af ;i-.. gni a c t ..-+i'"F X : Y�., .4...-...,..,',:, J ..,.....i.::l i>fyd\:°f�lroi1 P % 4. i .�a " y. • . alms a %►.> rv„ ✓j; 741 ;-:• p ,,,..b v�,e ,,,:i i t i..s*j ate ,';. .y 4. y. th t O S .eh [:..';',,A ` '''''.,..4.'.?* y y� � ! a 4 2 a �5.aatky !,,Setif- "Y4\W O '�A '' 'i"!-;.U.,' 0 '� ;')".,.....Ail 'tw.;4TI.A '4 `: �"� !Cv` '^ x _+- 1 y t. ��...a ii '",. *L f >.ay s}•••'`y y"ri> ,,. 0 agv..,77.-1,-i, .L "'► F ;. O -•^ i .1 et 4d ♦.k3, T' q, 1 1.`qt.. , ;.,we '�� l.-r. Zy S t - „,,,,,,,,,,:,7.,...„.,,,,...„.„.„,..,,..,,,.„ { Y... te„31:,c# ! ..;. &1 1+ '+° y, , r ZJ -, 4 f Fi '0 r �h 4 _ 7 �'E .� . .(,,h,t f it xt: mak'° { S, d t yr • ...� ,,,,,,.-.-t; 'k o^ ,4,4�:A, f t a� ,t. -- } N {{ oSyrd ` yy,.Sri f">t;�.• +d, 'S,!.'",...,,,,...e..:,r:ik44.7,,,,,,,,,,.'t•4-*Nr,6-4'`Life.:—.."-- -:-...., .-C;-'-`;'' 1 .-' y T • m ;tel. {'i:'..5;•-f,4;"•.. •,' A} y"y-. y T V 3 funs ¢ Etj4 ; „..:',....';.‘,...... ,...';,:',:7',': XV=YAC41,11''1'..rif:.il`-.4-4rtgtiata:1,1'.'.;.;. L, iii t�.hh •,� :-. J �$oft -13.Z, Mie{1 �.' 4 �+ l:-tom" �s., �'W `6� � ' - 1,,,,I.44.4 ,.. -",i,4 .; .1gfc. ,,,;,4,--,,.:,•....ii;.'.-;..- ! +s°:.;. 1 >'� ." '76”: Y ,4 : �J•11 Y ., .. 11 D�` rv P Lzf 41 3" 4S,. :-.7+ iA{ S i•rr ..wli._'t�'_• i1., ii .1 sxal •• yry ', 4 11 !!4 k >d �� ; i`� a: . s rt�ble�� ,�,g� Ls., t Ja M (' ,'ot > `? '�r+cs f 3 `` •br�ts3;�Y mrY �m 4p4 p� 33 Ill. a>� , �J ' iii _ii }a s -...w.yp '' ' ter. 1 "^Oa> V 6. i,�l y S.: S� �1 • tv. .1-0..A.,-;..44•44,-1 #.-01 mti`.:t.fe.#�k3` 4 v • • ,,i ...,,,:.:,,,,,,,,...•.,,,,,,-,,,,,,--- twi,.• f r, .,,,,..„....„ ::;-:::-.- -•*".':-, '1.;‹,,It...— . 4,1 ?.- 1.13 0,-.8P .-.:r.:. ,-- .. 1,. ...-� +�, � � �##iia ; E�ri'� � ,z��".' .7E _ n $ ,,, 11..0:4,..i,,-.,,V;510-4.;. 'R'R�N�i4 mss+ ' . as ,,,,,,,,.t.....Nr, �} y _i. aG - ny ea t ,:Js S , • L=, try-a e S +�' +v..es Fy . n. ,'-7' S �e q- sera D"i,W' '1`{'' } rs `t a s ; $}=te a v'i ill `41.! .- ;' ,: yf j r °s ��4 e , �t 4 ItA a� . '. b - '!_. s _ " :x i:v ds%' s 3 ;s6.L]ati �F`Iv?iE;iii p ., • ••_, ..• .•, . • . • . . . .. .... I �j 1 v gs�,r=scrams r 's, . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. - - ..- - . .. ,.. . , a { `Fa5 i� s .-1!...31,4-,tom l'„A�f`„,.... €l,„4�:`,i 'ai w Y b{p i 1•i _ yr'; ' i'. i �aiWnB �i.. ',rp` �t„'�,,ti, � ''`„ :._:.:..-.::.... lff a + � { i%� AL.,%3.-!',,,,7-.-,;..-.......-...- i ate F 'S�, e� ' P 1' J :yam as ip �� � � . ' int '1 c `te , c �.. 1t .., r,. r� , t Egli}ii 111 pr; N4i .. a t,-3'' mow:,r 5. .. `" 14— xx •*:74 i -- .ah 5.. ,r'a��.,.. yr : yc� x. a. �m) `• / }j) C'\ .. -.,,. .7 ^?>•++`i',...,,me.-.n^'T.m*' „ra: awy �.- , sa .F•YSY+.k 'x•v , } P k m x rnDr Om -1 < < ' 0 • =o zN hi!yz r s' 0 a �#� J'�� s,r 0 .0 5^ Y V1 j` '' t' ¢f z � • r ? $�a�a..4.et sok, ,• + < yi A s rj� ' s 7:f:,-7-1 - _t, '— '-` -+--i 411Z-fir---- — ' ' ° • ' -1 1 ' . . : - -:----,....-. •••• '. 1,,!'",k5,. „.,,,-...:-,..'2.e:QVit.Y.:k.-y:4i'::-..•;.:::,:::::.:-.....f.',1•-.?-::•.:. - ...;-2....:.•,:,.;.,•,..-....., $ :Kr? ( I( � i;1*..,:i .1:- ._1";..,.1 :;,iLll ,c,-( . :..: .....,.....-1. ..:_..........:-...,-.....sifi.:-.,::::,::::.E...y..i.-.;.1...-; ?..:::::::: ..:::.:.... il*-,'4;`,::-:. 4.,...,'...'.::i::.:':::.1':-:•:-:.!;'.:::'....*:.:,...::.......:::::'...'....;......;::..-:::.:".........:..:- :-.-...:::::•-•.-....1.''.-:::::'.....1!...-1::-''-'''.,....:.::::::::::....":.:::;::: a tr :.' '''. • • . . . ........ )... • . i k+ r • - - t1i d a � 77 {3 ++ff t!i�� + (t- �L§ she t is � `.,4" Yom* .. Y � � t �q� +� i �9 �`"" 45 1 a 1 e.i Mt "-i \h 1I f 1. t • P,d�� • ..,•;••••::':::2.:..-....':•-1.:=•-•?:::.: .• '. -,'',•-• . f •'-.f I ir •.- - ,•. ,- .. r iy> ..J X 'fi..., 45) ,:,•:::y. i : Yx .'1 it* ...i' t,4 �ft1. 1 r f 1 m 0 m —1 X > Z 0 0 3 0 > Z -- . —i1___ ti)). • cr, ��� Iii item* ' 'y ®/.a �: '�, ' a f 4 ®t 4 4 i i _ I ' DDS t # f m . i': ; .1 M ym, i'`x t `, .. w ! = 1 #' _ ,. 0 rt> 4f, ,4-37,-.,, :11,- ,-- ...,10 go IA "...i,.., . ; a * I.c ' k �� y ' t .4 i '14'r.'..:I 11 frtilti; g g ill ,, i -ica nii _ 4..) 1 3�t y l'` lil , `} i !71•,rt+ Z (� ' :, i Y µ ` G µ i t s � 1.Ill------- l (i !I. ilra.% '-Ra F I , . ---I t il,-;;J:. . C t ` i EL 114:.J t((t t • f}r� ��� � ii i 3 zi ifik. i y Ci• -�:�' , " i Vii, ,ii i :131 :� y ''t t 41 dll • 1111 II !,...,,...t.z1A1 : "�}f: tufo. ' L AI ROY rx0lit{".f!} � .�!!!S i F6--1!'ll ...' ii:-,;:7;.'/ �talf., F ! 4 .4. '.4. E/fill ri. a .x17.:13 :. y sr 11 d •t ¢9sT ' ) w ti. ` i t l .-±s) 1 iii ' , - - Iv k°,i = ., , „. :.,.. „ , P` !4 w } • Ill '# ,hy, v:,._ { Cr Melilla . /,,fir�h II g rrO • • 00 i _ a l • D i! a ' .I „ V t r --..... _ ,.r.. ,. _�_ _ =,..,...sem -..: ., - ,. „_ irysawxe a7Y w+ro ;^ c .asp: z*x v. - 1 • ryrr:.:,:''r" r tr2r •,:;!!!,::';',-;•:,10 71' I . • • .rr frA m 0 - • rr: M rrrr M " If47VA044,',',4 r0; "' • > g - r „ Z 0 a I > , . 5', • • • • I • • • ,• • • • • •• ••„ < • M f . m r n - I I 11 H I I (I) 1111. • •• Wm, •••• C 0 • ;i:7'..is; 41, m 0 m m r-- 0 > FP> - 0 z z m m woolo CO 4 \ Art `,IL.:',--‘4, i m }is ` 1 art k i a,;L $.4... ft .. N.4%' 7 O } s A6' '{` e .,,Td . i D y kAaf3+0,!.,!, . ry I3 IV! 1 ;. a m t • m .' s i �j r„..., 40„,. .4,...,=trt, 1 } .,.: 46 ;, • 7T-0 :}11 N' n � 1 < 'III -1,,,vi:-- ..!(.:, ilfillEitif; 1-f Tif.1 ‘ .0 - .ti , ....!.,...;... , Jo 1,, . 1. II Y 1 } W ` 'O.,-.,Pr P 1 f r '' ,AP , Z �t 7;>�� 2y�! ,.,p,..„,..,.... r .Z -! - ,..,:•..,.'"T411 1: i't-,0,-- .. t."-, fo hog ti.• h ¢lp417� v. YID tiV ;Exi C 3 t : '141? tent 1 1151 r „. Ise—''.z.:-, ' i.'-' "i, 22;,..4,14. ,' ,_ ,r -., • • ii\f stt $ • 61:-.11:4:.: 5 (T (( .t y, 11 l'%.,_..-iiisa sill t� 4 t tter1 j . 1it �3 --..4 iv .....,,:, , ,,,o li :,;1..--- .....• . F;� • Eat , 7 rfmtr.: J>t&!► 1 ' .r !'''..ii!-.."`e . & f —. 4 14i C y;il 1 CX Yb •T4:,[471,. 6;,... . % • ,/ ...,. ., . .T , i.„..., 1 i :I.j,iglo.t, -•,--,rix: ...,',F, ....:. 3 k� :.,, ill 4( se ,,—v,,,-- __' '' { tom r liti 1 1 Ae -+7c .:r Y `• .. • `2 :Re �` 1 0R, 1.1 r •g 3' i Cs ,fit 2;'t1 6•�.�jy l�kl 1 *, , 3 >- jj l � 1 i z .---: �{ q3'}i fj8 rI 9 { � N* G r t 'fit'. I; '-:"L:41,11 �.. fSi 35tr :,fetil i tc, .� t a t.. •x e i �' -,s i} 3r yr 4 .3 yt .- r' C/) li m 14 t, O 1 - , 4 Z m m D _. , P' A eti",'N. 4 '!".'.'`.;Ni.‘1.,‘4- Cf) ?:, :._1 ': .' '' m \ � Z 0 z p eY ,`, 0 Z m f \i ,,e mn v) Z Z Z 00 o G-) n m --\ v) Z 0 0 mm cn n \s.) 0 0 Z � X Z m r0 D Z m > cm \ PHb Z c = c C) Z 3 -� C : r m 0 O `� z o m = 02:1 D cn O H C r W Z /A r Ips i,.. ; 1 o I , rt Z ► 0_ r,-, 1 I .11 > - - H I O� Z 6-) Q --1 (7, IZ ,,,__ , , 1 .,_ v„ m __, , ,_..,._. , _, , ::::_:,- ____„...,. _ , n NJ O , N z C 0 Z y 3 -I73 ny\ 3 k�Y ' m A '',P,`r f•'� 41./Z ig- ., ;� 41--) 110 H /I 1 1 ii Iii iii( rill 111 !riff !fief p I 43 ri; ill 1 „, 1 • ti. 1!sir 141U 11 > "...... IP 4 1 fli"" Ili Z 03 II 1 III II III it It li /111! 11/1 'WIT i ,7' o r- ix iii, ,, , 1 ,.. f t M (") II II I 1 NT 114 11 II i 11/Pi Sr 11 ;1 I I :f • • 11• lir rti i,:"...*...—'''i 1:1 % n 0 41 ft its 11 If II 11 if III Iii it M r 1 I 11 II ril M 1 /1 li II 11 I II II ill . .... I I I 1 h p 1 1 ...,„..-t; ,,„,lo I 11 i z i • • ..i.- 1 m > 1 A Intr...,,..t. c t * 'tv=1 it:',WW. r t !3 410•••,......rrill'""°' ‘i 4 " ,••••••1"' I ''- 111 1 11. Pc LI-111 e 4 - L . 1 .,„, •-;„- 13 , , ...x.\ .... ., tt , , - 4 1 r.0- i A : -i.-1 1 "' , y , 1 ii 4 \ 1 ',- . • I Viz Al a '. 1 ': •'- ,. / i, ':"'It' ''' gill 7 NI A ',.41,:.'::'‘ ""'''*-- 1:' -,14:411114 rg ...,. ........, ,,.... , , ,,. .,. ,,,,,,:,,,, H.-I itt ....,,4, .1 1,...-.--,..N4r -,C1'," iii.: 4z, ib. A 4 100.6"w'.-tY, wilirerell 11116.4,1V>.4 *7,1- ''--/-. ' '' \ 1 alp 4 i_ mem . _,.,.........r. traparmaJ... .• ..... 02.........._ mi. 4.....„.„. _ .1. .;•.., I ..\ 1,..„J„,,,, IL.,.. . \ Iii:owr. ° - • fr ' - - - mut - .' \ i`,.:::p II : ''t.I.,i, MEI . 14.,,,,,,ss.lri s. I IA ,:' '''''1/4. 1111. I 4 i -7.... % ., li I v • /111: . . I; i 4-- k,.. tr , • 1 '""Z.4" ''--, ' ''.''' r ,..,.. , Is\ -‘- • • I 1 q ;1 its - A e11 .4 AT. '.. -- . .. t0_ o,.. —"-AZ :,,',„.....4.. -,..... -.s....o--• 't•=.4..../''...,.-.-v.›.. ,4 , N...„-N.,\• i,i,- #.,.Y. r1i 11 .1.4 ,,, ,.• . 'HI ' • ' , :11‘114 > 000,...........-,- > its ' \ 1 441... ..-••• -.‘ 4,, 111) I b . , a o , - 1 '). 4ttfP .L t-4-, •- 411„ I .4 IMUMII xf, « 0 - 4 - •`, - , 14 q , ‘,„--lal.e.-,vrige r.i...•Ili _, if 13 i_. 1, ...:,„:,,, .' ' : '' v AN......„. N. . ,,„, /1”‘ 441 ZgL31/ ..: 4^:t ... ., –.416, 10•6____ -- 4 r""......, ------... , .,,, 1 as I .. , .,... , ‘. .-- ,, ' , 11;10 :1-..::r.._,Nlit• ''''' - ' -: 1k I i lam MAI l' i' 144. ' 9 11114,'""ir=iier2t, .3 tZT.-------,-.- 1.',------7'; .64`410.... ' n 1 " 0111 i IV,' a A.,,-.44 5 . . . _ ,..- , • -,,.:,-, .4 _, ,,.. -0,, ei 9 _..... Iiii42111 ,. .. .4011110'141, ' ..•..-.. 0 It ' sr r -z-....‘,,‘, 1 li , 64k, ` 4 , '" ,,,‘\\ "... Irmitaal .$ ;A 4 - N.„,, • 4 . . .-. ._ .0 . ....„4,... , o ‘ •' - . 6 . iliZt. , 'IP 44' III I ''' ...:_ak '51K 411111jk A \ -'"- Sal 47 fir"• , .446 7. OW ' ;'/S' '*.oe 4''' - 'i C% 0#:: I 1 1}1 , g MI t I4‘lkiv...4.1147m4,rap .A;4„e.:*-- 464- ,--„- , laitiot mustal -'4,, 4; i ; • 4;0/14 .1 1.. INs. .‘ ill, , IL ii, ,!....., s Li41111014frt.44 illb 'b.. It‘.1.t 44 . . 1:-."' ,.. ' • Igir=vii •6=4:1=1Tort.nom.1....41111Ffiglitt14114 4" •••1 ,' ,..t.....,, , 0 i UP il 1 • ts. I Z''''t°- '4r4:13ties, -,116; \ - .. ‘ , z , 1.... " .4, d vol • . s`,se 14 ... 1-111Pli A k\\‘:, 11 MOS 6 I . • 4 rtip, NI'N,..• • An -' MOO I. 4 i4 („„ • - • N." •** 1/4 ,. c.,W 0 4 • I' ilk KO ki • • . s 1 • . , ._ - ,,,',., „,..A• \c„,-, ,..,\,•3 4,„,,, • \ 4 t,„,- ii., .. :,.--. v:. 0, 11 lea I I ...:=0,v00$6.716.11,1;41_,, ir z tZ) 16, 4 v. ...T.,....0..mm, s • . , \ ,,\, 0 -,-......,4,- 1.N . s \ • AN It .0 ‘ . .‘ • 11 nil • , -*N. .•- - 44. 0, . •••-...N. lior v, ‘04 tr- isl °. .4* t 11111:4 ;°iri "A P' .11`4 4 , ..,,,• ' • -.0 ..... i . w i‘ ‘ . • - 12 . il — A 110 ik, 4 ''''' ' ,. • ' '-,' I .14. . ..N.44,10, • k Allirvr t;:y.S.46, .7, „,,, ,,,ii` 0 s , . , II $ -7,_21r_H_If-A. 0 % kik 40 ' • • ;-' LI. I ill $ e. 4i., ,,,,,:. , ----10---, .0 .. . . 00, .......,...14.i Aril% 1,- --t\;: ..„.,..--..„ ,,,,,-K \ .,,,, .01 N 44 ':'''''1.241/41_?;:f"ft ,,... ____., P 'ib „, 'r4-11.21.i .• ,....3.0.....•_.......-—•:- „.... —. — ...1.4.11ilikit i IX,RVaillig r-v-,...,..rlo-.......-......,,,..,-..-,/,,........ 1 Its;'‘N II‘) 0 - — iiit_ii... ffaiiii t=ia c-ii- - sia .. 1-ilf',---a- ..1 '-' 1--- - • laal Wall aa-tM 11 -- r=-A lii ii-: 1 ...,.... , . / I-2 1-f--, Z ,. -c) 0 0 / m c on CJ 03 d'i \/ m r- z • . . . _ , ,.... C3\ \s X 0 \ , „.... . .. )=. '13 , ,..„, . z m Z 0 .... \, C1,.'''s 41;"-ii-. . . . , . , . ,--',''' ''-' ..•.," rc ' ' r - . 4 '' '''''''', - , Zr \M. -''''''-`,:i.. I ''- - , ''' 'N', ',." - - --- . . ' Z I \\ ' ''''. '-:\" - ,'' ''''-.----.. ..- : •' -.- --___ ..-- . , 1 ;.''''-: -.-__,_ .-^...'-. ' ' W : ,,s''''''':-'. 0 I''''1:-. '- ‘..' ' ' --::::---.-.. '' ''.' ---- ' ' ' - ''''' '-' Z '/ ) 1'-:,:,.‘ Aihkelliki \ ' ' • \ . . . , , ......,_. 1-'-, 11I -N-._, -,A - , . , \ 1 --''' I 1 :L..: _ . '... A& . --. ----, • \ 1 -. . I 1 -- -- - - • s , • — _ .. _. ... . __ _-- ---...-- ___ sz,.',..,-,--•.. Allir .. _ 41. '''-- _. - -.• --- -- -. '`` \ .. .. - - • -- If'''"- 1111111111111 -' ,.. . :,' „7-1 -,1''Z-:',:„-• "' A ', ____,.. • - . - ---- . -- . ----•• \ --I.. 1 T1 , \ , -- - -I ---':-:.-i-J;6 i ‘,' '17,}- ' __-. --,E..:':''' 1 ''i . - - \ ', \.... ' -- i' . • eO • ) - fV- I \ ,, : , - , D:3 \ -, - I '- '.- . _ - , , ‘ L. S. , ,. ___77 --- - _ 1 1 --- ...i,= = = .. . ,,,,,, .corg., -Ik ' 1 , ,.. . . -...:•-)N, \->,,- 1144410 ) A\ /N 1,....' i- '\'‘ :-''''--..'----. ''' ' ' ' ' ''' / s 1\ '-. I. --, )'T"\ ZL - •-;_ - --• / ' \, \t ,.. -- - • 1 s----1 .-„, > , ,-.. , . , - ,. -, \....,- . . \ i .. i ,,, „. , „,., . , i ., , - \. ., .,, ...,,,,,. ‘.1,-... i - , ..- kNilYhk1 1 !';':i.'3'.-':-- V - • '-\\ ‘ '''' ' -',1" 1 - '' r I 'zl-,:,7',;- t - 1- , , - - .-;;,-;',,r-,/ 1 ) .. - -'. i_ii- -:-\''..\, - 1 - - ' 4.-,.1!' -k,„-,,164•'-'- fx;,.4-,,,, -2-r- ‘ ' -- , t..).-"5-",:- i :.';' ,N, ..-.'"- - 1 -- -4 .'-).,. ..-, ----,k_ .........., , , 1 ,_ ,:,,,..._,:_,,, , 2 ..r.:,.,.....-::,,,,,, „ /7'7:7:..,-\ \k 4,...I - --•-• i I .. ..- • . -- '• ".•,-.."•.t."..--;',,---?.. ,4--..,.. t -- --4*-k \ k ----.....: -. ,,,,,,:-,,,„„i...,.. 4,..- ,... \ ,,,.... vo\ '--- u ...---1- ----=----_-: _ - ,‘\ \ -a, il I ( _...,\I _,...t r- - -- ---1 III---- I , ims----111-!- ----ilr.A 1:,-, ' ''".'-\ \v0- -. 1 II 1 I 1 iL-074-cd,41,,,,,,1 low,,,..=-,„.. 44illuvA..\-,1.•,-;:_ -:-:-,,,k.Ny ,‘_c___, ..,,,soile I . 1 I Adaker..... i ...... ,2,„&-.,... -,---- i ----,, ,' A, N-.. ' ' IrialgIt**1°41% 1 I r '-- - 1, 1.___ __1.___ __.__ .F._.... __ 7------ ----77............- -.4, -... h1 I " i ; --,....,...' ,.! ,,...-. --OfriA \ k \,,/".• o'it'k, -k ---5-,_,,, ArirA\jai , $ ;/f...„117_,r - -1- - - -- --1 -1 --- - - \ • 717r."‘1111w1 „0\s'.s_....1,----.4li,----, q. ,'"i 1 \ .-11,;: _....ifi.- c 1.1.P...... ... ."... V,......",:::: —At I - •••-'..". lial"-""'W ,,k‘' I . <- ‘7,1, -kok Pr;z:- , -- '',\';k, \/ , \:-1$0,,-••• 1 1 .,,-- -,- ...... , ___,/--,0- ‘,...---4"..,11 OP' --- ' --' • ,- ' 46.— AVE. ,_ 1 i ,- . __. ---- -- , li•r-ittsilel ) i \vilio.........r...,,..s-- 0. IL—=---- ---,-, i ._• ------ __ - r- -- -1 --'---)-4---------------____________, -- --1 --=- -, • . .. .. . n) L )\) ....L :=-7.z........,..,) 0.sON co yrkiJEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER • 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 FAX TLt11LV SMI•1TA1 DATE: S• TO: -4-CC,fk t PHONE: ((125) 7c,f - i SOO FAX: ( cl2 3 37- NUMBER OF PAGES including cover. 3 FROM: Jy S;,' 14 JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER PHONE: (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 SUBJECT: 1- - oCs •� a� COMMENTS: DOE Let(-e v 1-1) C3 n C c- daps) c/ c•-� z o, 19198 Building Environmental Health Development Review Public Works Building Permits Septic Permits Subdivision, Zoning Road Approach Inspections Water Review & Shoreline Permits Permits &Addresses (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-445 IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON �- IIJ =- ? IN THE MATTER OF a request to I i u q ) � MAY � 8 �.,'U�0 Extend Preliminary Subdivision plat ) FILE NO. LPA92-0008 approval for the preliminary plat of ) - Canoe Cove, a Mixed-Use Develop- ) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, • ment, The proposal consists of 52 lots ) on 23.5 acres. Applicant is AK ) AND Sharma, Port Hadlock KSC LLC. ) ) DECISION Board of Commissioners Decision: We have reviewed and considered the request to extend preliminary subdivision plat approval, comments, and other pertinent information, and the Department of Community Development recommendation./ We hereby: �/ Adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Department and grant approval of the preliminary subdivision plat described above. The preliminary approval will expire October 18, 1999. Reject the recommendations of the Department and find that a change to the recommendation is necessary. f�- DATED THIS((; DAY OF May 1998. JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS /.` 1411, // EN HUNTI GFORDV4:ir7nan411111k- ' / ,�/ "l` n �7�7 1 /, ' BARD E. WOJT, ember y 444471 DAN HARPOL '( ember ATTEST: C-� &-1/L-C-41 LORNA L. DELANEY Clerk of the Board LOG ITEM # '7( JEFFERSON COUNTY SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WASHINGTON STATE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT (RCW 90. 58) PERMITTEE: PORT HADLOCK KSC LLC DATE ISSUED: May 26, 1998 ORIGINAL PERMIT ISSUED: TYPE OF USE: CASE NUMBER: SDP92-0015 REVISION APPLICATION DATE: October 9, 1992 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tax 19, 22, 23 , and 24, in Section 1; Tax 21 in Sections 1 and 12 ; andd Tax 23 and 24, Lots 2-12, Block 7 of Bay View Addition and Lots 35-40 of Irondale Acre Tracts in Section 12, together with adjoining tidelands, all in Township 29 North, Range 1 West, W.M. WATERBODY AND/OR ASSOCIATED WETLANDS: SHORELINE OF STATE-WIDE SIGNIFICANCE: SHORELINE DESIGNATION: CONDITIONS: Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the following conditions: 1) The conditions listed in the original shoreline substantial development permit issued October 18, 1993 . 2) The SEPA mitiation measures of the Final Modified Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance issued June 8, 1993 . 3) Prior to construction, the applicant shall prepare final covenants to protect native plant species within the buffer zones. The covenants shall be reviewed and approved prior to construction. 4) The applicant shall construct a boardwalk of timber and stone for simultaneous protection and view access to wetland areas. The boardwalk design will feature 'nodes of interest' that will provide interpretative graphics and language to explain the ecological characteristics of the tidal lands, the riparian wetlands and the marine estuaries. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit design plans to the County for State Department of Ecology review and approval. The plans shall include interpretative signage regarding wetland functions and values. 5) The applicant shall continue design discussions regarding clarifying areas for riparian plantings relative to open space and recreational LOG ITEM .�- 70 areas. These designs will illustrate the waterfront north of the main structures near the beach. The design for riparian plantings shall be reviewed and approved before commencement of planting. 6) The applicant shall prepare a plan for the placement of discrete, durable signage in the buffer areas that will serve as physical reminders of the restrictions on disruption to shoreline vegetation. 7) The shoreline area shall be developed in accordance with the approved Shoreline and Landscaping Plan. The riparian bluff lands that separate the Villas by the Sea from the tidal beach will be protected as much as possible. 8) The placement of structures on the remaining Villas by the Sea bluff lots will be restricted such that the southerly line of vegetation will be the setback line for structures, including decks, wherever reasonably possible. 9) The Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions for the plat of Villas by the Sea shall be amended to incorporate the above setback restriction. 10) To facilitate implementation of the approved revised plan, the applicant shall make application to Jefferson County for vacation of J . lots 1 through 5 and lot 25 of the Plat of Villas by the Sea. 11) Prior to final approval, the applicant shall prepare a site plan that is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 18.40. 050 of the Jefferson County Code. The final site plan shall be formatted in such a manner that upon its recording it will be a Binding Site Plan with sufficient detail to give effect to the plan as submitted. 12) Provisions of the Shoreline Plan developed in conjunction with the revision of SDP92-0015 shall be an integral part of and conditioning for future shoreline permitting related to Lands End. NOTICE: 1. This permit may be rescinded by the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners or the Washington State Shorelines Hearings Board upon finding that the permittee has not complied with the conditions herein, pursuant to RCW 90. 58. 140 (8) . 2 . The permittee is liable for all damages to public and private property arising from violation of any provisions of the permit hereby granted, including the cost of restoring the affected area to its condition prior to violation and possible court costs that may ensue from violation, pursuant to RCW 90.58. 230. 3 . This revised permit is effective immediately or, when appropriate under WAC 173-14-064 (5) , upon action by the Washington State Department of Ecology. Appeals shall be in accordance with RCW 90. 58 . 180 and shall be filed within thirty days from the date the revised permit is filed with the department of ecology or, when ecology' s final decision is transmitted to the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners and permittee. Development undertaken pursuant to that portion of the revised permit not authorized under the original permit shall be at the permittee' s own risk until the expiration of the appeals deadline. If an appeal is successful in proving that the revision was not within the scope and intent of the original permit, the decision shall have no bearing on the original permit. 4 . Development or substantial progress toward the revised development shall begin within two (2) years from the date of the revision and completion of the permitted activity shall be accomplished within five (5) years from the date of the revision. 5. Nothing in this permit shall excuse the permittee from complying with any other federal, state, or local statutes, ordinances, or regulations applicable to this project, but consistent with RCW 90. 58. / v. ! / .01,A1 ! Glen Huntingford / airman ___504 ', Jefferson Cou'ty Board of Com issioners (sdprevis.txt) SDP92-0015 • JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Agenda Item Information/Description ' Consent Agenda Item Regular Business (check one) FOR WEEK OF: May 26, 1998 1. Description — Revision to Shoreline Substantial Development Permit SDP92-0015, an approved and issued permit. The revised proposal is a mixed-use development consisting of detached single- family residential, condominium multi-family residential units, marina services, restaurant and lounge, health spa/recreation area, swimming pool, reception, banquet facilities and three-level parking garage. Applicant is AK Sharma, Manager Port Hadlock KSC LLC. Project name, Lands End (formerly Canoe Cove). Case Number SDP92-0015. 2. Issue —There are no known issues regarding this proposed revision. 3. Opportunity Analysis — The department has evaluated the request to revise the existing shoreline substantial development permit Recommended findings, conclusions and conditions are attached for review and action by the Board of Commissioners. Options are: (a) After examining the request and accompanying materials, BOCC may adopt the staff's recommendations and approve the permit revision; or (b) Determine that a public hearing will be held by the Board and direct the Development Review Division staff to publish notice of said public hearing, and further determine that the Board will adopt its own findings prior to approving or disapproving the request; or (c) Remand the application to staff for further review. 4. Specific Departmental Recommendation — staff recommends adoption and approval of the requests for revision. 5. Review Process -- If this issue was sent back for further review by the Board, please indicate the Additional reviews undertaken. if the review is simply good business policy--indicate what reviews have taken place. In Risk Management In Legal/Prosecuting Attorney 1-tn Fiscal/Budget in Department Head lin Public Services Director l& Board Management Team l Other impacted Departments - Please list Not Applicable. 6. Work Plan including What, Who, When and How has been completed. ❑ YES (Please provide copy) lin NO (Why Not?) (Check one) Not Applicable. # LOG �TENi JEFFERSON COUNTY SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WASHINGTON STATE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT (RCW 90. 58) PERMITTEE: PORT HADLOCK KSC LLC DATE ISSUED: May 26, 1998 ORIGINAL PERMIT ISSUED: TYPE OF USE: CASE NUMBER: SDP92-0015 REVISION APPLICATION DATE: October 9, 1992 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tax 19, 22, 23 , and 24, in Section 1; Tax 21 in Sections 1 and 12; andd Tax 23 and 24, Lots 2-12 , Block 7 of Bay View Addition and Lots 35-40 of Irondale Acre Tracts in Section 12 , together with adjoining tidelands, all in Township 29 North, Range 1 West, W.M. WATERBODY AND/OR ASSOCIATED WETLANDS: SHORELINE OF STATE-WIDE SIGNIFICANCE: SHORELINE DESIGNATION: CONDITIONS: Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program and the following conditions: 1) The conditions listed in the original shoreline substantial development permit issued October 18, 1993 . 2) The SEPA mitiation measures of the Final Modified Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance issued June 8, 1993 . 3) Prior to construction, the applicant shall prepare final covenants to protect native plant species within the buffer zones. The covenants shall be reviewed and approved prior to construction. 4) The applicant shall construct a boardwalk of timber and stone for simultaneous protection and view access to wetland areas. The boardwalk design will feature 'nodes of interest' that will provide interpretative graphics and language to explain the ecological characteristics of the tidal lands, the riparian wetlands and the marine estuaries. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit design plans to the County for State Department of Ecology review and approval. The plans shall include interpretative signage regarding wetland functions and values. 5) The applicant shall continue design discussions regarding clarifying areas for riparian plantings relative to open space and recreational I 'areas. These designs will illustrate the waterfront north of the main structures near the beach. The design for riparian plantings shall be reviewed and approved before commencement of planting. 6) The applicant shall prepare a plan for the placement of discrete, durable signage in the buffer areas that will serve as physical reminders of the restrictions on disruption to shoreline vegetation. 7) The shoreline area shall be developed in accordance with the approved Shoreline and Landscaping Plan. The riparian bluff lands that separate the Villas by the Sea from the tidal beach will be protected as much as possible. 8) The placement of structures on the remaining Villas by the Sea bluff lots will be restricted such that the southerly line of vegetation will be the setback line for structures, including decks, wherever reasonably possible. 9) The Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions for the plat of Villas by the Sea shall be amended to incorporate the above setback restriction. 10) To facilitate implementation of the approved revised plan, the applicant shall make application to Jefferson County for vacation of lots 1 through 5 and lot 25 of the Plat of Villas by the Sea. 11) Prior to final approval, the applicant shall prepare a site plan that is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 18.40. 050 of the Jefferson County Code. The final site plan shall be formatted in such a manner that upon its recording it will be a Binding Site Plan with sufficient detail to give effect to the plan as submitted. 12) Provisions of the Shoreline Plan developed in conjunction with the revision of SDP92-0015 shall be an integral part of and conditioning for future shoreline permitting related to Lands End. NOTICE: 1. This permit may be rescinded by the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners or the Washington State Shorelines Hearings Board upon finding that the permittee has not complied with the conditions herein, pursuant to RCW 90.58 . 140 (8) . 2 . The permittee is liable for all damages to public and private property arising from violation of any provisions of the permit hereby granted, including the cost of restoring the affected area to its condition prior to violation and possible court costs that may ensue from violation, pursuant to RCW 90.58. 230. 3 . This revised permit is effective immediately or, when appropriate under WAC 173-14-064 (5) , upon action by the Washington State Department of Ecology. Appeals shall be in accordance with RCW 90. 58 . 180 and shall be filed within thirty days from the date the revised permit is filed with the department of ecology or, when ecology's final decision is transmitted to the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners and permittee. Development undertaken pursuant to that portion of the revised permit not authorized under the original permit shall be at the permittee's own risk until the expiration of the appeals deadline. If an appeal is successful in proving that the revision was not within the scope and intent of the original permit, the decision shall have no bearing on the original permit. 4 . Development or substantial progress toward the revised development shall begin within two (2) years from the date of the revision and completion of the permitted activity shall be accomplished within five (5) years from the date of the revision. 5. Nothing in this permit shall excuse the permittee from complying with any other federal, state, or local statutes, ordinances, or regulations applicable to this project, but consistent with RCW 90. 58 . Glen Huntingford Chairman Jefferson County Board of Commissioners (sdprevis.txt) SDP92-0015 9 ITl< ilk 1 III 1. 1! ill i '1? i 1z v) II i iii zfli-ri fili it Flipiki.....---. 1 o --1 r r 41 ii ll flit- nil 0_. > l 'UiI I 1 ,411Rop-4,,... _,, ;; lei Jill w4,10-•,m —onow ,. : , 1 / � r li /I rt II au .......... FS : = i1 . • 9 -� _ I.•, O i • .4j% #„„.....--- ;A ',>:,.‘,: I ! 1—•1 1 1 , �•-' \ , • '.:::' jiliA igli•'1111r.4011".... ' . ' 1 r:11 . 1 • . \fill 1 ' I • 4 .:‘,,,,,:„..„. II 4 * , • tAt•4 • /4 1 4 I • .,, i ., ,,,,..„ 1 k r .... ik . mill I. lOrg' :...,.!,‘ ihil„, - .-k1/4,,,i.*ilidittpliN\ I-I-1 - N • pi -41 ..!,,t. .1 ., 1 . \ ,044F , . . .- , I ( . -,. ...-• - - ,;-..z-., ., . N. El -:.- - . . .. Fes_• �'r I{ II d • ,. !Iiii: , .. ,, . ..t4e.i,, i_Aicils 11.1‘,\I°T6:4e_Ai ,:iick:v: . .„Nt.14 .1.1 , r „a. \ 4' •-• • . • . , .1k .1; ii '; • IIIMINIIII ii egralkaj.11-,:1Z1 :\A,..,‘„ , "''':'-:.',76''''''.7 . .:IA Ii, 1 g ., IINIPIML1 . '''','S-V i Lis 1 I.ra111111111111113t �akL . 41ril I. 1:w-'2 I°;+,7:1,. i 11 ik-1111111111111 . i-,11"7- '""v+Its :, _ "1"1=6.... ".31:211=3 "-r414411, %/41K:-"Coss' :8:11%41.4..4/...... ' ''''''-'77.- I L.,"1 7-134X rl I ,,•;.1, di irj. wart,;;-7„.....,sgi lillitL::)..-1 . • .0.. • -A- ' 12-Zil I ' ... ' 4"---4114k4":14111' ''1!*:Ii,;I'l • kr 4 \\I`\ il imli . ...1 j:1 NriL ..,.v94.41:01,,, .....1.,, . ‘b • ._ . /../.4,, .._ ... / *.... ,,,-- .. _,,,. ,..;,,,.;y„:„.. , . .0,,,,,, ; 1„,„ 104/2,,......,q,.._ . im*. ,., ez, -..t‘z .. .. r-7.-- -7, v \\ 11— i.,7-E- zi i 11 '� � t� 4; / a + 96 / .". itit:11.0,...w.to 't -?« 1 w‘4°.?!.ra="117tiri.J'_re.....-1.4V;*/* # '.--% S1 'lt' ,. .11 1 pir -"—...w.:.. vai, .7,-..._. 44*. -• '. Ali,„6„, ,_ ,\,,, .. .„..... .._ . ..i_ _"rib.--gZ., ,:r7s.,„› ic.).1 % s , , ,, . ick, ..CI-4:7-19&‘ .,Ace. . ovs i, \,\N., 1 mini a i- - • . - - I 4*. S.'I!'- ! 4 At ;,,,x . Ah-.4tit. s ve,telr-,it . • s\,. '•tillgin .1.)'. '"WirAlla tarer4/Alat C; -I. • • - \ 0• • • may• + ` ��N`1 %� , • • NI • 11 "2,• 4 ( , i- I (. It; •'-:: e;:‘ I `4'.1* _14. .. • 41 9141011r42,." 4- °P. ltIle.SIC4*.filOirl‘.1 '1 H l -M60"*"";;.--- 2 h .•'..,-..'-',gy.. ."y t �` b LYx. T P" _ -r4,,,, Z .t M ,.r . • ' 't1L. ..3' ii -MII Ngie...,-a r• '.4..;;..4.i LI,==i0 kiigMNI isiaaiiim 1.1........ ......... ._____ , 0 • . . • z -.•,,,x' . •,..'4, / / -I:, -..) sC--) / . mc On , .. 0 03 M • m z \ r- , . ' • 0 \ , , - - z m v \ -1:1,-• ', \ , Z(-1,rri L , Z1 —\ ---,,, - - - - '- - ~—— . . '‘‘ .....-.- - \I . T. 1 111 1 1 1,, ,.-411111111::,'1t. :-' - ' / t se. - -7 -- A -,.. \ .. -.....s. , 1 =-- r--2a c.,.-- I '- - , -.. • '... . - I -:: -17 7:: ‘-. *- s, t • •. ' Allihk) \ I -- ' \ Jt 7 ---- ---- -- - - ., NI - -- - - - - 1 -•".‘ , __ _...------7.7._.------ v[ ,' .„, ‘.... 47111116,. ,..., ' \ --. .47.---. -----N _,_....,.. -4--, .4.- - -1 I--- ''' I I 1 1 1 I I I i I I I I `- - • Allibo-,1 -. --- 1{tr, ••.,. 1 N 1 -....,..-, , • -- N - - - •.,—iv \ • . _1 0 • 1 1:•,-4,: I - --, . . ,, '",-- - r-- , i,z--• ••• ,. . ...--..r' _•- 1 -• ii, ] . I) If ' I'') (' 1 '''4' ' ' - — - -=-- i P 1 5?,. , \• t — '--'' I•_ A1+;:-., ,....-. -.,,-, ‘ ;r , .. ‘,... . K . , _. _,„ , 1 1 , .-- , i ,-,,,,z..-: i _. , , ‘ --,..:-...,, I.,\ ,. , ‘ •S; At# iI \1.-',.::,.. t 4 i ' ... ' - '4..4.•'44 t.:.'-' --/ .- X''''' \II p.4.'..-- \\,. i--...., I-,"'tA''':.14 *(A.,', , ' "' \ "!. ',...:;•-"-\ i%.\ -'.-, I------,--t _,__ ----- -:-......: 1,, . ' . -,, T.: - • '2•' ..... \ . , c-,,.. , ... '.... ,04k ‘1 \ it -- :-- .."--.'--.:.,...::::-...7.--..-'' ...,,,.*."- - -.:- ''',,. '' N\'`,./ Z .. ..... S....." W\ \\\ " -:: . ,.. 1 _'''''''• '17.-.-'":':`., ( r-''' ra -k. .„ ‘ x,e' -41 .,.. ‘ \ --- `-'---- r-, 1 ...--_ - --1 t.,:,'-: -'1.,,, .-, v 4001.,:'' \\‘ \ i --, ,,__ fik; \-"-t,.:-... 4,..."".i..- : ..,,,... \ p___,..‘ ...... ,,,..eiriaiwiftr..‘ „. \\\\,. \ r'llilt I. -- rt .- - -- - --I 1 , il - tri,11111 i'llippAiiiiii.,',,:f.,-,,,' ..,., '.s s6.!(4A t' 1 .......''.....41' \J 10, • , Af#A•ki,,,,„,t,„„---, - . , ,,tc.,--,,,Nt-Ni. , r 4.1401, \ ,.....-".:0" 1\ \\•\\\N\_,'-- .•,- I 1 I 40PA'..%. 1"''''' ..it...... r.'1Z-:;;...2,1`-'-'` '-='..4*.:'!,.'1• 14 A...,/' droor 1 - ".........1- ''' r 000 k• I I 1 , V,/ ..,..... 021.11.44, '.."•_,,-\ IL ..\ro ,- \\,\\,.. I ' r-,. '— i...-,-,4"'''t \- _ -\toe . \N.< ‘.7' ." •-•' ' -Ab.‘ I ' .- '"---- ' ki',. M..k -1 \ ''''''\,AN.-•"'". 7.---.‘ , ••- - -) AI:A P....,....%•"--.0 •••'''.../ --./ -'- ----).., ( ,i, ,1-- _ -.,, 10— i .-141r0.40-ML 1 \ liliiillklf. \ AVE. 1 i r - 4,7‘..7i4`..;4;,›N..,--- -q,: —---/ ------- - , ,.... ,...s>.,,, . _ --- ) i ‘1„<fii,•_,....-tr" ----- ' '' Irihi=•-41. -11, , - ,._,.. . „. . _ . , c , 4 K- .,. s L- 3 1. P....44w rm`--1 } En z z 0 Z m m C) 0 0 m m m -1 -I O O O D70m Z xi r Z ZNX r --I � � mDCmX r DD —�I 0 D Zr O -m—{ � cmi� D �-1 � O � C Z C m O r � m � CZ 0 � ZG) Z Z � N mz z � 7C vt.=i co Z —+ _1 co Z C = C Z r o c - r- 0 M • o n v, Z 0 m � = Z D rn 4OH Z cd,„ Q 0 c) _1 co r fir° Z 4; .44 -A-- '.-. I\\ 1444 :4_,_:P--:"--I...k-q-F' /' GI 4-e„- �C m . D v) - I 4,____, - r f- i fi - v' 1 O Z ! „i T Z m --I � is O z70 �1 N � 0 p ( z C O ? 7a 3 � Z C r 3 r Y'N'7 / m Aft 1.7fr 1 I— r-- '''',4tAtt;10-*;,,ftly 11 III II O -1 3 m -0 n, D m cn — O 0 Z c o I ♦ �' •;{ .,., x,a ..�,. ...; 'a. � s+� .g. ;'.` "...`" ,. � ..'a �`' a. -. � r.� �€�..a.': 2. _ � �� `fie. ,..[:"�' P� - ,. .'..x, May 20, 1998 TO: Jefferson County Board of Commissioners FROM: Jefferson County Permit Center Staff SUBJECT: Revised SDP Request for Lands End, Formerly Canoe Cove STAFF REPORT Introduction: This report evaluates a request to revise Shoreline Substantial Development Permit No. SDP92-0015. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: I. Applicant: AK Sharma, Manager Port Hadlock KSC LLC II. Proposal Description: The revised proposal is a mixed-use development. It consists of detached single-family residential, condominium multi-family residential units, marina services (storage lockers, locker rooms, change and shower facilities, laundry facilities, restroom, care room, and small convenience store) primary restaurant and lounge, health spa/recreation area, swimming pool, facility services, general reception, banquet facilities, secondary lounge, reception center. Construction of a three-level parking garage consisting of 516 parking spaces, access road improvements, and designation of open space are also proposed. III. Location: The existing Port Hadlock Inn and Marina at the old alcohol plant site in Port Hadlock. The site fronts on South Port Townsend Bay. IV. Legal Description: Tax 19, 22, 23, and 24 in Section 1; Tax 21 in Sections 1 and 12; and Tax 23 and 24, Lots 12, Block 7 of Bay View Addition, and Lots 35-40 of Irondale Acre Tracts in Section 12, together with adjoining tidelands, all in Township 29 North, Range 1 West, WM, Jefferson County. V. Shoreline Designation: The shoreline environmental designation is Urban. W. Zoning: General Use (G-1) VII. Comprehensive Plan Map Designation: Residential, per the Tri-Area Community Development Plan map. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION: I. Hearing Date: The Shoreline Management Advisory Commission held a public hearing June 16, 1993. II. Site Visit: September 24, 1997 III. SEPA: A final modified Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance was issued June 8, 1993. No appeal was filed. IV. Notices: Mailed: June 2, 1993 Posted: June 2, 1993 1 Publication: June 2, 1993 (Port Townsend-Jefferson County Leader). TESTIMONY: Shoreline Commission Public Hearing: The Advisory Commission public hearing was opened on June 16, 1993 in the Jefferson County Courthouse. After the procedures for the public hearing were explained, testimony was accepted. All testimony was taken under oath. A verbatim recording of the public hearing is maintained in the Jefferson County Permit Center file. Jim Pearson, Associate Planner, presented the Staff Report,together with its attachments. Jim Engle, City of Port Townsend Public Works Department, testified concerning the status of the water commitment from the City. Jeanne Sisneros, adjacent property owner, testified that her view would be eliminated by the proposed condominiums and expressed concern about drainage from the site. Jim Pearson gave final staff comment. V. The Shoreline Advisory Commission adopted the Staff Report with the recommended conditions and Conclusions of Law and recommended issuance of the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to the Board of Commissioners. VI. The Board of Commissioners issued Shoreline Substantial Development Permit SDP92-0015 October 18, 1993, subject to conditions. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Application for the original shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SDP92-0015) was made on October 26, 1992 for the construction of a mixed-use residential and commercial development on the site of the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Marina and adjoining property. The proposal included the following: renovation of the west wing of the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Restaurant building (west wing of the old alcohol plant)to create 8 residential artist studio condominiums, a restaurant, and a recreation center with swimming pool; (a) demolition of the east wing of the old alcohol plant building which had previously been converted to a hotel; (b) construction of 44 attached single-family residences; (c) construction of four 21-unit condominiums; (d) construction of roads, utilities, and parking areas with 213 spaces; and (e) Designation of open space. The proposal included an off-site community drainfields south of the Oak Bay County Road. Characteristics of the Site—The site currently contains a resort consisting of a hotel, restaurant, parking lots, and marina. The hotel and restaurant occupy the converted alcohol plant buildings. These are concrete structures that were built in 1911 to produce alcohol from sawdust. The proposed site is a portion of the Lower Hadlock Bay Historic Site. It is on the State Register of Historic Sites. 2 2. Subsequent to issuance of the original substantial shoreline development permit, the proponent received approval (permit number SDP95-0008) to modify the existing breakwater and construct an addition to the existing marina. 3. Substantial progress has been made in developing the single-family residential portion of the proposal. The plat of Villas by the Sea was approved and recorded in November 1996. The modification to the existing breakwater and addition to the existing marina have been constructed. 4. On May 8, 1997, the applicant submitted detailed plans and text describing the proposed changes in the permit, to the Permit Center. An application to revise the shoreline substantial development permit was submitted to the Permit Center March 6, 1998. 5. The Shoreline designation is Urban. 6. The Zoning designation is General Use (G-1). 7. The Comprehensive Plan designation is Residential. 8. Characteristics of the Area—The adjoining area to the south is platted in urban densities, however, there are only four residences immediately adjoining the proposed site. The area to the east is platted and developed in urban and suburban densities with small lots adjoining the shoreline. The area to the west is not platted. 9. Jefferson County Permit Center staff conducted a site inspection on September 24, 1997. Jeffree Stewart(shoreline specialist), Ann Boeholt (wetland specialist and Mark Benley (wetland specialist) of the State Department of Ecology were present. Al Scalf (Community Development Director) and Jerry Smith (Project Planner) were present at the September 24, 1997 site inspection. 10. A wetland located approximately 110 feet southerly of the ordinary high water mark was noted. 11. On October 31, 1997, Jefferson County received a letter from the State Department of Ecology. The letter stated that the key language in determining if the proposed revision is consistent with the scope and intent of the earlier permitted design is in WAC 173-27- 100 (1). This code rule states: If the local government determines that the proposed changes are within the scope and intent of the original permit, and are consistent with the applicable master program and the act, local government may approve a revision. 12. The Department of Ecology, in a draft letter dated April 23, 1998, stated their support for the revised Lands End plan. DOE indicated that"we are coming close to an acceptable modified design for Canoe Cove." REVIEW CRITERIA Revisions to Shoreline Substantial Development Permits are evaluated in terms of the criteria specified in the respective ordinance(s). The following ordinance provisions are applicable: 1. The Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program, Section 4.105, Urban, and states: The urban environment is an area of high intensity land use, including residential, commercial and industrial development. Urban shorelines should be designated for high intensity use or multi family residential development. The urban designation may also be applied to areas of lower intensity use where the surrounding land use is urban and urban services are available." 3 2. The Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program, Section 6.404, Revisions, states: When Jefferson County receives application to revise a shoreline permit previously granted, they shall determine if he desired modifications are "major and significant. "If the modifications are determined as major and significant, a new and complete application shall be processed in compliance with this section. In the proposed modifications are determined as not being major and significant, the Board shall review and thereafter approve or deny the request for permit revision. When a permittee seeks to revise a permit, the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department shall request from the permittee detailed plans and text describing the proposed changes in the permit. If Jefferson County determines that the proposed changes are within the scope and intent of the original permit, they may approve a revision. "Within the scope and intent of the original permit"means all of the following: 1. No additional over-water construction is involved, except that pier, dock, or float construction may be increased by 500 square feet or 10 percent from the provisions of the original permit, whichever is less. 2. Ground area coverage and height of each structure may be increased a maximum of 10 percent from the provisions of the original permit. 3. Additional separate structures may not exceed a total of 250 square feet. 4. The revised permit does not exceed height, lot coverage, setback, or any of the requirements of this Master Program except as authorized under the original permit. 5. Additional landscaping is consistent with conditions (if any) attached to the original permit and with this Master Program. 6. The use authorized pursuant to the original permit is not changed. 7. No substantial adverse environmental impact will be caused by the proposed revision. If the sum of the revision and any previously approved revisions violate the provisions above, the county shall require that the permittee apply for a new permit in the manner provided in this Master Program. 3. Section 2.15.01.026 of the Jefferson County Regulatory Reform Ordinance (hereafter JCRRO) states that: "a change by an applicant... of a proposed project may be determined by the Director"as minor[or]major". CONCLUSIONS 1. Based on the listed findings, the modified project does not require a new Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, as only minor changes are being proposed. 2. Because the changes are substantive in effect, since the original permit was issued, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Revision is needed prior to approval of building or septic permit(s). 4 3. In relationship to review criteria of the Jefferson County Regulatory Reform Ordinance, the Director of Community Development has determined that the proposed project is minor in nature and therefore does not require a new review process. 4. DOE concurs with Jefferson County that a revised shoreline permit should be considered acceptable under the circumstances. Their concurrence is because the applicants are agreeing to strengthen preservation of native species through covenants for buffer zones, and because the modified proposal includes construction of a boardwalk simultaneously protecting and enabling view access to wetland areas. DOE determination, which is supported by the Shoreline Administrator, is under the terms of liberal construction to effect the purposes of the law. 5. The applicant has prepared detailed plans and text, which adequately describes the proposed changes. 6. The detailed plans and text document that no additional over water construction is involved in the proposed permit revision. 7. Ground area coverage is no greater than that permitted in the original permit. Documents accompanying the revised detailed plans verify that less ground cover will occur when compared with the original permit. 8. Height of three (3) of the five (5) principle buildings approved in the Canoe Cove plan were located at a point that represents the highest geodetic elevation of the subject site. These three buildings are also fifty (50) feet in height. Site profiles within the revised detailed plans and text describing the proposed changes illustrate the following: (a) the top floor of these structures, as relocated in the plan for Lands End, are at a point roughly equivalent to the ground floor of the highest Canoe Cove buildings in their location south of Alcohol Loop Road, (b) building height as determined by shoreline standards, will be lower by six (6) feet, and (c) additional protection for shoreline buffer zones and protection of wetland areas. 9. Landscaping has been greatly enhanced and will be expanded to the west. For example, provisions for the westward expansion of the riparian bluff vegetation toward the Terraced Garden (cultivated native growth and Rhododendron species) and Reflecting Fountain Pool have been added. 10. The proposed uses are essentially unchanged. 11. Preservation of natural features such as an existing wetland and bluff vegetation will be incorporated into the revised proposal. Less impervious surface will result. Impacts to the environment will be lessened with approval of the revised plan and permit. 12. The proposed revision, properly conditioned, will be within the scope and intent of the original permit and will be consistent with the applicable provisions of the Shoreline Management Master Program. 13. Based on the above Findings and the Board of Commissioners adopted Findings and Conclusions of the original permit, the criteria for the Revision to the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit have been met. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 5 Based on the Findings and Conclusions above, the application to revise Shoreline Substantial Development Permit No. SDP92-0015 is recommended for approval, subject to the following recommended conditions: 1. The conditions listed in the original shoreline substantial development permit issued October 18, 1993. 2. The SEPA mitigation measures of the Final Modified Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance issued June 8, 1993. 3. Prior to construction, the applicant shall prepare final covenants to protect native plant species within the buffer zones. The covenants shall be reviewed and approved prior to construction. 4. The applicant shall construct a boardwalk of timber and stone for simultaneous protection and view access to wetland areas. The boardwalk design will feature `nodes of interest' that will provide interpretative graphics and language to explain the ecological characteristics of the tidal lands, the riparian wetlands and the marine estuaries. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit design plans to the County for State Department of Ecology review and approval. The'plans shall include interpretive signage regarding wetland functions and values. 5. The applicant shall continue design discussions regarding clarifying areas for riparian plantings relative to open space and recreational areas. These designs will illustrate the waterfront north of the main structures near the beach. The design for riparian plantings shall be reviewed and approved before commencement of planting. 6. The applicant shall prepare a plan for the placement of discrete, durable signage in the buffer zone areas that will serve as physical reminders of the restrictions on disruption to shoreline vegetation. 7. The shoreline area shall be developed in accordance with the approved Shoreline and Landscaping Plan. The riparian bluff lands that separate the Villas by the Sea from the tidal beach will be protected as much as possible. 8. The placement of structures on the remaining Villas by the Sea bluff lots will be restricted such that the southerly line of vegetation will be the setback line for structures, including decks, wherever reasonably possible. 9. The Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions for the plat of Villas by the Sea shall be amended to incorporate the above setback restriction. 10. To facilitate implementation of the approved revised plan, the applicant shall make application to Jefferson County for the vacation of lots 1 through 5 and lot 25 of the Plat of Villas by the Sea. 11. Prior to final approval, the applicant shall prepare a final site plan that is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 18.40.050 of the Jefferson County Code. The final site plan shall be formatted in such a manner that upon its recording it will be a binding site plan with sufficient detail to give effect to the plan as submitted. 12. Provisions of the Shoreline Plan developed in conjunction with the revision of SDP92-0015 shall be an integral part of and conditioning for future shoreline permitting related to Lands End. Dated this 20`h day of May, 1998 6 . V , • • z 1- \/> r- o iri zo , o CD o n • .06 • ril I, • • • . •• •z •• • • • • • • • • • • • • ft • •• • - • • • • • • • • • • • • /"., • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • - .."-"..,..'' '''''.:4'*k5-(••g,x„'r':'';- .,. -'•,-',i,_:...';,-,.--:,.! '..',',-N".4=4; -. • • • • 1..-r..4"-e:',--Z,.:04'- a=, i. 7 . t �1' g�g 45, • '--5.0%.-IP''''''-4 ,. v x11, � i- .?4,4.- ,,-'y�Ye=s ,4;, F VI e y • 4 t • • `♦ '. • • J trt 7- Yt� N �p -1 rrl r n -1 . " � m mm r- 70 � • • • rn a m o o Z m a � A ,.; ,,,-.•:‘‘.0i55: N m 7U i ,;4'...r r • Fe °--,..11.,. --44, • •••••••"" > Z flu �j n Ait„.. - . . • 73 .T. • . ,.,..,_...,. ....„„,„ „..,_. .. ..., • ..:. • J . z rt., v3 ,c3:3 . �� ® Z Ips �; - A ' o )to o • i \iti . Z:F•3 70 5 .., 7c 55 • 70 70 m Ti4 M m tit 70 m C3 0 73 Z 73 IP" n 73 7z 3 -,-5 _K mcD 7o 1 so 111. 3.„ s m z › ,o, , m 7, , „._, ..._, rTi r; ?.< i';.' 11111101111 1111.0004 Z. /10 _....-- -- 411011111° \ ' in • 73 • \ =!,. ,- -/ -4•1^‘ ,-; - . \ ' • ' i -- 1 .., 70 71 Z '3 m ilt„, (6 \ ,,./. CP L It '. . . ' ' . • --.5>< 71 N -,,,,,,,,q,, ; N. ,.), ui . \ s 4.-fit 4 _...„„...., . • _ .I .., ,.. . . • ,,.,..„ .,:\ ... . . • ,...------ -A.--, \ <<‘ • , , • D ! 4 I i 1 0:, a . ›.. — ''' % '\-- / - . . ...or”: 114:'"ft. '' -3, .....4 -. . k 101 • \1,..0.• ...•0" -7_4(i) .„,....c......„.. ......„.N. 9-''''' ) 0 - 00 • spAt. 7t7,\• '-',_ ...,-,:!.---, , # -......\..\ \.,...........--''''',.1, 00.0.. "Nlifr- _t . ..,, _ i /\ 2 \\ • laji .. . ... . 0, .,,, ,,,,.> > i ,.... ______ ,,, a _ • . --4144t"'We,VI 1. *X- ,.'.,'-'476- 4';',., iv. .-..-Zt'''-%-•'.1.' 4, _,_•.- , ,,„:,„,.;,,,,„-ii-, -.., ;i:E.:... -; - ,,-- -1,-,,' -1,-,-_--,-1-7,-F ,t- It-: - ,,-,-, _, .- _ ,t, ,...,.. .,..„,,, tf,_,44 .,.. ,,,, _ , :. ., „ 4 ''.'t,'',.. ,,,‘.c.t'Or‘ .., 4 ''',.'.--C---7 4''..-• ' ...4.,wc.. 4 '' •,:, =, -,-,_ - 1,.. .=. ,,t,. Sr; CO ),II� • JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 14'1-6N- SX G,SO TRANSMITTAL TO: JEFFREE R STEWART CASE NO. SDP92-0015,CANOE COVE/LANDS END DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY DATE:May 21, 1998 PO BOX 47775 OLYMPIA,WA 98504-7775 RE: REVISED SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION SENT VIA: REGULAR MAIL XXX HAND DELIVER EXPRESS MAIL FEDERAL EXPRESS PICK-UP OTHER WE ARE SENDING YOU TUE FOLLOWING: COPIES 1 APPLICATION XXX Sim PLANS SEPA CHECKLIST OTHER STAFF RPT XXX REVISED PEMIT TO BOC XXX DESCRIPTION:PROPOSED FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS TO BOARD, STAFF EVALUATION AND RELATED PACKET.. THESE WERE TRANSMI 1'1'ED AS CHECKED BELOW: FOR APPROVAL FOR YOUR USE XXXX AS REQUESTED FOR REVIEW AND OTHER COMMENT COMMENT: PLEASE SUBMIT ANY COMMENTS YOU MAY HAVE. i ,� SIGNED —??/ JERRY ,PE V I NTER STAFF Environmental Health Development Review Public Works Building Road Approach Building Permits Septic Permits Subdivision, Zoning pp Inspections Water Review & Shoreline Permits Permits & Addresses (360) 379-4450 LOG ITEM FAX: (360) 379-4451 # (1 �4,S ON co w4 JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER � y 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 TRANSMITTAL TO: ALLAN CLARK CASE NO. SDP92-0015,CANOE COVE/LANDS END ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN CORP DATE:May 21, 1998 SILVER LAKE HOUSE 11215 NINETEENTH AVENUE SE EVERETT,WA 98108 RE: REVISED SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION SENT VIA: REGULAR MAIL XXX HAND DELIVER EXPRESS MAIL FEDERAL EXPRESS PICK-UP OTHER WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING: COPIES 1 APPLICATION XXX SITE PLANS SEPA CHECKLIST OTHER STAFF RPT XXX REVISED PEMIT TO BOC XXX DESCRIPTION:PROPOSED FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS TO BOARD, STAMP EVALUATION AND RELATED PACKET. THESE WERE TRANSMIFIED AS CHECKED BELOW: FOR APPROVAL FOR YOUR USE XXXX AS REQUESTED FOR REVIEW AND OTHER COMMENT COMMENT:WE MADE THE TARGET DATE FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE BOARD. SIGNED: ,&; f�'1 Y S ,PE ENTER STAFF Building Environmental Health Development Review Public Works Building Permits Septic Permits Subdivision, Zoning Road Approach Inspections LOG ATF_ Water Review & Shoreline Permits Permits &Addresses (360) 379-445f-- ----- FAX: (360) 379-4451 May 20, 1998 TO: Jefferson County Board of Commissioners FROM: Jefferson County Permit Center Staff SUBJECT: Revised SDP Request for Lands End,Formerly Canoe Cove STAFF REPORT Introduction: This report evaluates a request to revise Shoreline Substantial Development Permit No. SDP92-0015. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: I. Applicant: AK Sharma, Manager Port Hadlock KSC LLC II. Proposal Description: The revised proposal is a mixed-use development. It consists of detached single-family residential, condominium multi-family residential units, marina services (storage lockers, locker rooms, change and shower facilities, laundry facilities, restroom, care room, and small convenience store)primary restaurant and lounge, health spa/recreation area, swimming pool, facility services, general reception, banquet facilities, secondary lounge, reception center. Construction of a three-level parking garage consisting of 516 parking spaces, access road improvements, and designation of open space are also proposed. III. Location: The existing Port Hadlock Inn and Marina at the old alcohol plant site in Port Hadlock. The site fronts on South Port Townsend Bay. IV. Legal Description: Tax 19, 22, 23, and 24 in Section 1; Tax 21 in Sections 1 and 12; and Tax 23 and 24, Lots 12, Block 7 of Bay View Addition, and Lots 35-40 of Irondale Acre Tracts in Section 12, together with adjoining tidelands, all in Township 29 North, Range 1 West, WM, Jefferson County. V. Shoreline Designation: The shoreline environmental designation is Urban. VI. Zoning: General Use(G-1) VII. Comprehensive Plan Map Designation: Residential, per the Tri-Area Community Development Plan map. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION: I. Hearing Date: The Shoreline Management Advisory Commission held a public hearing June 16, 1993. II. Site Visit: September 24, 1997 III. SEPA: A final modified Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance was issued June 8, 1993. No appeal was filed. IV. Notices: Mailed: June 2, 1993 Posted: June 2, 1993 LOG Publication: June 2, 1993 (Port Townsend-Jefferson County Leader). TESTIMONY: Shoreline Commission Public Hearing: The Advisory Commission public hearing was opened on June 16, 1993 in the Jefferson County Courthouse. After the procedures for the public hearing were explained, testimony was accepted. All testimony was taken under oath. A verbatim recording of the public hearing is maintained in the Jefferson County Permit Center file. Jim Pearson, Associate Planner, presented the Staff Report,together with its attachments. Jim Engle, City of Port Townsend Public Works Department, testified concerning the status of the water commitment from the City. Jeanne Sisneros, adjacent property owner, testified that her view would be eliminated by the proposed condominiums and expressed concern about drainage from the site. Jim Pearson gave final staff comment. V. The Shoreline Advisory Commission adopted the Staff Report with the recommended conditions and Conclusions of Law and recommended issuance of the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit to the Board of Commissioners. VI. The Board of Commissioners issued Shoreline Substantial Development Permit SDP92-0015 October 18, 1993, subject to conditions. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Application for the original shoreline Substantial Development Permit (SDP92-0015) was made on October 26, 1992 for the construction of a mixed-use residential and commercial development on the site of the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Marina and adjoining property. The proposal included the following: renovation of the west wing of the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Restaurant building (west wing of the old alcohol plant)to create 8 residential artist studio condominiums, a restaurant, and a recreation center with swimming pool; (a) demolition of the east wing of the old alcohol plant building which had previously been converted to a hotel; (b) construction of 44 attached single-family residences; (c) construction of four 21-unit condominiums; (d) construction of roads, utilities, and parking areas with 213 spaces; and (e) Designation of open space. The proposal included an off-site community drainfields south of the Oak Bay County Road. Characteristics of the Site—The site currently contains a resort consisting of a hotel, restaurant, parking lots, and marina. The hotel and restaurant occupy the converted alcohol plant buildings. These are concrete structures that were built in 1911 to produce alcohol from sawdust. The proposed site is a portion of the Lower Hadlock Bay Historic Site. It is on the State Register of Historic Sites. 2 2. Subsequent to issuance of the original substantial shoreline development permit, the proponent received approval (permit number SDP95-0008)to modify the existing breakwater and construct an addition to the existing marina. 3. Substantial progress has been made in developing the single-family residential portion of the proposal. The plat of Villas by the Sea was approved and recorded in November 1996. The modification to the existing breakwater and addition to the existing marina have been constructed. 4. On May 8, 1997,the applicant submitted detailed plans and text describing the proposed changes in the permit, to the Permit Center. An application to revise the shoreline substantial development permit was submitted to the Permit Center March 6, 1998. 5. The Shoreline designation is Urban. 6. The Zoning designation is General Use (G-1). 7. The Comprehensive Plan designation is Residential. 8. Characteristics of the Area—The adjoining area to the south is platted in urban densities, however, there are only four residences immediately adjoining the proposed site. The area to the east is platted and developed in urban and suburban densities with small lots adjoining the shoreline. The area to the west is not platted. 9. Jefferson County Permit Center staff conducted a site inspection on September 24, 1997. Jeffree Stewart(shoreline specialist), Ann Boeholt (wetland specialist and Mark Benley (wetland specialist) of the State Department of Ecology were present. Al Scalf (Community Development Director) and Jerry Smith(Project Planner) were present at the September 24, 1997 site inspection. 10. A wetland located approximately 110 feet southerly of the ordinary high water mark was noted. 11. On October 31, 1997, Jefferson County received a letter from the State Department of Ecology. The letter stated that the key language in determining if the proposed revision is consistent with the scope and intent of the earlier permitted design is in WAC 173-27- 100 (1). This code rule states: If the local government determines that the proposed changes are within the scope and intent of the original permit, and are consistent with the applicable master program and the act, local government may approve a revision. 12. The Department of Ecology, in a draft letter dated April 23, 1998, stated their support for the revised Lands End plan. DOE indicated that"we are coming close to an acceptable modified design for Canoe Cove." REVIEW CRITERIA Revisions to Shoreline Substantial Development Permits are evaluated in terms of the criteria specified in the respective ordinance(s). The following ordinance provisions are applicable: 1. The Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program, Section 4.105, Urban, and states: The urban environment is an area of high intensity land use, including residential, commercial and industrial development. Urban shorelines should be designated for high intensity use or multi family residential development. The urban designation may also be applied to areas of lower intensity use where the surrounding land use is urban and urban services are available." 3 2. The Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program, Section 6.404, Revisions, states: When Jefferson County receives application to revise a shoreline permit previously granted, they shall determine if he desired modifications are "major and significant."If the modifications are determined as major and significant, a new and complete application shall be processed in compliance with this section. In the proposed modifications are determined as not being major and significant, the Board shall review and thereafter approve or deny the request for permit revision. When a permittee seeks to revise a permit, the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department shall request from the permittee detailed plans and text describing the proposed changes in the permit. If Jefferson County determines that the proposed changes are within the scope and intent of the original permit, they may approve a revision. "Within the scope and intent of the original permit"means all of the following: 1. No additional over-water construction is involved, except that pier, dock, or float construction may be increased by 500 square feet or 10 percent from the provisions of the original permit, whichever is less. 2. Ground area coverage and height of each structure may be increased a maximum of 10 percent from the provisions of the original permit. 3. Additional separate structures may not exceed a total of 250 square feet. 4. The revised permit does not exceed height, lot coverage, setback, or any of the requirements of this Master Program except as authorized under the original permit. 5. Additional landscaping is consistent with conditions (if any) attached to the original permit and with this Master Program. 6. The use authorized pursuant to the original permit is not changed 7. No substantial adverse environmental impact will be caused by the proposed revision. If the sum of the revision and any previously approved revisions violate the provisions above, the county shall require that the permittee apply for a new permit in the manner provided in this Master Program. 3. Section 2.15.01.026 of the Jefferson County Regulatory Reform Ordinance(hereafter JCRRO) states that: "a change by an applicant... of a proposed project may be determined by the Director"as minor[or]major". CONCLUSIONS 1. Based on the listed findings, the modified project does not require a new Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, as only minor changes are being proposed. 2. Because the changes are substantive in effect, since the original permit was issued, a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Revision is needed prior to approval of building or septic permit(s). 4 3. In relationship to review criteria of the Jefferson County Regulatory Reform Ordinance, the Director of Community Development has determined that the proposed project is minor in nature and therefore does not require a new review process. 4. DOE concurs with Jefferson County that a revised shoreline permit should be considered acceptable under the circumstances. Their concurrence is because the applicants are agreeing to strengthen preservation of native species through covenants for buffer zones, and because the modified proposal includes construction of a boardwalk simultaneously protecting and enabling view access to wetland areas. DOE determination, which is supported by the Shoreline Administrator, is under the terms of liberal construction to effect the purposes of the law. 5. The applicant has prepared detailed plans and text, which adequately describes the proposed changes. 6. The detailed plans and text document that no additional over water construction is involved in the proposed permit revision. 7. Ground area coverage is no greater than that permitted in the original permit. Documents accompanying the revised detailed plans verify that less ground cover will occur when compared with the original permit. 8. Height of three (3) of the five (5) principle buildings approved in the Canoe Cove plan were located at a point that represents the highest geodetic elevation of the subject site. These three buildings are also fifty (50) feet in height. Site profiles within the revised detailed plans and text describing the proposed changes illustrate the following: (a)the top floor of these structures, as relocated in the plan for Lands End, are at a point roughly equivalent to the ground floor of the highest Canoe Cove buildings in their location south of Alcohol Loop Road, (b)building height as determined by shoreline standards, will be lower by six (6) feet, and (c) additional protection for shoreline buffer zones and protection of wetland areas. 9. Landscaping has been greatly enhanced and will be expanded to the west. For example, provisions for the westward expansion of the riparian bluff vegetation toward the Terraced Garden (cultivated native growth and Rhododendron species) and Reflecting Fountain Pool have been added. 10. The proposed uses are essentially unchanged. 11. Preservation of natural features such as an existing wetland and bluff vegetation will be incorporated into the revised proposal. Less impervious surface will result. Impacts to the environment will be lessened with approval of the revised plan and permit. 12. The proposed revision, properly conditioned, will be within the scope and intent of the original permit and will be consistent with the applicable provisions of the Shoreline Management Master Program. 13. Based on the above Findings and the Board of Commissioners adopted Findings and Conclusions of the original permit, the criteria for the Revision to the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit have been met. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 5 Based on the Findings and Conclusions above, the application to revise Shoreline Substantial Development Permit No. SDP92-0015 is recommended for approval, subject to the following recommended conditions: 1. The conditions listed in the original shoreline substantial development permit issued October 18, 1993. 2. The SEPA mitigation measures of the Final Modified Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance issued June 8, 1993. 3. Prior to construction, the applicant shall prepare final covenants to protect native plant species within the buffer zones. The covenants shall be reviewed and approved prior to construction. 4. The applicant shall construct a boardwalk of timber and stone for simultaneous protection and view access to wetland areas. The boardwalk design will feature `nodes of interest' that will provide interpretative graphics and language to explain the ecological characteristics of the tidal lands, the riparian wetlands and the marine estuaries. Prior to construction, the applicant shall submit design plans to the County for State Department of Ecology review and approval. The plans shall include interpretive signage regarding wetland functions and values. 5. The applicant shall continue design discussions regarding clarifying areas for riparian plantings relative to open space and recreational areas. These designs will illustrate the waterfront north of the main structures near the beach. The design for riparian plantings shall be reviewed and approved before commencement of planting. 6. The applicant shall prepare a plan for the placement of discrete, durable signage in the buffer zone areas that will serve as physical reminders of the restrictions on disruption to shoreline vegetation. 7. The shoreline area shall be developed in accordance with the approved Shoreline and Landscaping Plan. The riparian bluff lands that separate the Villas by the Sea from the tidal beach will be protected as much as possible. 8. The placement of structures on the remaining Villas by the Sea bluff lots will be restricted such that the southerly line of vegetation will be the setback line for structures, including decks, wherever reasonably possible. 9. The Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions for the plat of Villas by the Sea shall be amended to incorporate the above setback restriction. 10. To facilitate implementation of the approved revised plan, the applicant shall make application to Jefferson County for the vacation of lots 1 through 5 and lot 25 of the Plat of Villas by the Sea. 11. Prior to final approval, the applicant shall prepare a final site plan that is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 18.40.050 of the Jefferson County Code. The final site plan shall be formatted in such a manner that upon its recording it will be a binding site plan with sufficient detail to give effect to the plan as submitted. 12. Provisions of the Shoreline Plan developed in conjunction with the revision of SDP92-0015 shall be an integral part of and conditioning for future shoreline permitting related to Lands End. Dated this 20th day of May, 1998 6 wa#sON co JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER . ;, � 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 FAX TEZANSMT1'1'AL DALE: c-20-9 S TO: PHONE: ( ) 1 /S-v o FAX: ( ) 227 - NUMBER OF PAGES including cover - FROM: y JEFFIERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER PHONE: (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 SUBJECT: Ca 146 p, G Vie- P k-7or s:6/61 , COMMENTS: 8 O c c- Building Environmental Health Development Review Public Works Building Permits Septic Permits Subdivision, Zoning Road Approach Inspections Water Review & Shoreline Permits Permits &Addresses (360) 379-4450 LOG EM FAX: (360) 379-445 . JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Agenda Item Information/Description Consent Agenda Item Regular Business (check one) FOR WEEK OF: May 26, 1998 Description — Revision to Shoreline Substantial Development Permit SDP92-0015, an approved and issued permit. The revised proposal is a mixed-use development consisting of detached single- family residential, condominium multi-family residential units, marina services, restaurant and lounge, health spa/recreation area, swimming pool, reception,abanquet k KSC LLC!Iities an' Projecttl ntame, Land-levels Endarki garage. Applicant is AK Sharma, Manager Port Hadloc (formerly Canoe Cove). Case Number SDP92-0015. ▪ Issue —There are no known issues regarding this proposed revision. ▪ Opportunity Analysis — The department has evaluated the request to revise the existing shoreline substantial development permit Recommended findings, conclusions and conditions are attached for review and action by the Board of Commissioners. Options are: (a) After examining the request and accompanying materials, BOCC may adopt the staffs recommendations and approve the permit revision; or (b) Determine that a public hearing will be held by the Board and direct the Development Review Division staff to publish notice of said public hearing, and further determine that the Board will adopt its own findings prior to approving or disapproving the request; or (c) Remand the application to staff for further review. Specific Departmental Recommendation — staff recommends adoption and approval of the requests for revision. . Review Process -- If this issue was sent back for further review by the Board, please indicate the dditional reviews undertaken. If the review is simply good business policy--indicate what reviews have taken place. 1 Risk Management Legal/Prosecuting Attorney ICI Fiscal/Budget 1 Department Head In Public Services Director l Board Management Team 1 Other impacted Departments - Please list Not Applicable. Work Plan including What, Who, When and How has been completed. ❑ YES (Please provide copy) NO (Why Not?) (Check one) Not Applicable. FROM : ARCA ARCHITECTURE PHONE NO. : 4253374180 May. 18 1998 O1:45PM P1 FAXArra Architecture and Urban Design1 1215 19th Avenue S.E. III Everett.WA 98208 Date Number of pages including cover sheet To: From: Jerry_,�m�' t_h Alan Clark AIA Jefferson County Permit Center Phone Fax Phone 360 379 4451 Phone (425)743-1500_ CC: Fax Phone (425) 337-4180 REMARKS: 0 Urgent ® For your review ❑ Reply ASAP 0 Please comment Jerry: Per our conversation this morning we are forwarding herewith the graphic depicting calculation of building height pursuant to the Shorline Act, as opposed to the calculation to Uniform Building Code. MAY 18I'y: 14A(K 109,gE FROI•I HRH r+RuHiTEi.TURE PHONE N . . 4n3774188 I•Idy. 18 1898 81.46P1•I 1.2 To • or sLAbl° Nip oaf --- SOO I:1 1/01 tip t N4 14814 11' l'i NMPIIIMIIIA i0411 e WC' STa ,.—..---- -- r 16 p,y6vs.e-A, p(tSTime+ Ifs 4svoole. ViAltattR swim s►6w+4.40. ,hGH• 1:4,4e.mcp.ir _ bp.y�� ter?Y-- 411.0096 extt,i7!►•ic, �,� .�EFFEzsoN �,,Nry :�"yor � "6'4'419i M= 20 1—e t{ 98.05.0s. A4ww,s/4 j MM.11 7. P 41.04 Caw Z. ff.A( fitZ f: 1To eF ¢oo¢• \ .-------- * �14G'%04. 14 t*r. 3 . yTo � •p 1 .e irS4Q0. ' 111114 4R44S � � StQevapi,{c. 404446 s3t�' a%A4001F ...W w re-�b�. ti sti.oice LAO e ��� ZOt•O" 16'05. 18 CµA�AGcyre► 't NAP.VrVIC. �R04 ' !O'1 ; `-HArca -- ,� A&rct�tU r b a f MAY 181998 �Uil��� D e 5 s g n -__rw wVFNVF St!:1*:;;`,-VA 9EI:/ T:17 517'.;Z IIQa , 7-•}�io osONeo (t \ JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 May 14, 1998 Allan Clark Arca Architecture & Urban Design Corporation Silver Lake House 11215 Nineteenth Avenue SE Everett, WA 98108 • Subject: Revised Shoreline Permit, Zoning Conditional Use Minor Revisions, and Subdivision Plat Approval for Canoe Cove (Lands End) Application, SDP92-0015, IZ46-93 and LP08-92 Dear Allan: The purpose of this letter is to advise you of the status of review and action on the above revised shoreline and land development permits. Review of the shoreline permit revision is going forward and will be going to the Board of Commissioners with a recommendation to approve the revision, subject to conditions. The Community Development Department and the Department of Ecology have collaborated during the revised permit review process and will continue working together to finalize the conditions of approval. Because subdivision plat approval extensions require Board approval, and given that substantial progress toward plat finalization has been documented, the department's goal is to include a recommendation to extend the plat approval in the same Board of Commissioners packet. It is the goal of the Department of Community Development to finalize review and prepare the necessary revised shoreline permit, including the subdivision plat approval extension, for consideration and action by the Board of County Commissioners as quickly as possible. The target date for submitting the shoreline permit revision and plat approval extension packet to the Board of Commissioners is May 20, 1998. The target date for Board action on both is May 26, 1998. Whereas, the State Department of Ecology has indicated their support for the revised Lands End plan, we are awaiting their finalized conditions of approval. Preferably, these conditions should be in the revised shoreline permit packet. By ordinance, the minor revision to a zoning conditional use approval is an administrative action that has received preliminary approval and will be finalized by the Director prior to the Board's action. Building Environmental Health Development Review Public Works Building Permits Septic Permits Subdivision, Zoning Road Approach Inspections g oFWater Review & Shoreline Permits Permits & Addresses (360) 379-4450 - -- COL FAX: (360) 379-4451 ,, N Page 2 May 14, 1998 Allan Clark Should you have any questions please call me at 360-379-446.5. Sincerely, Jerry Smith Associate Planner C. Department of Ecology, Jeffree Stewart Community Development Director, Al Scalf . . • ��, JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER c ��,� 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 6 , FAX TRANSMITTAL DATE: #4 /4 / 199e TO: A11-0--4 C 0,4, 6.' c4 PHONE: ( '4 6) -7443- t700 L7 FAX: ( ) 3: 7- 41 / g"e NUMBER OF PAGES Cv,. C,til� i g v cA.— FROM: -0 1- L 1 c14-1 ;1-� JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER PHONE: (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 • SUBJECT: ear% �"7�'d cV She' Al.e., A/74-1r'{ COMMENTS: /e 7440i />>N , . (1e7" 04- ,4 . /3 -foQ( 4//.s-,.A - /54cG . , • R Building Environmental Health Development Review Public Works Building Permits Septic Permits Subdivision, Zoning Road Approach 379-4450 Water Review & Shoreline Permits - Permits &Addresses Inspection Hotline 379-4450 379-4463 379-4450 379-4455 1-Qnn1531__a_s_ FAX: (206) 379-4451 FROM : ARCA ARCHITECTURE PHONE NO. : 4253374180 May. 08 199E 12:29PM P1 Arca Architecture and Urban Design ���FAX lEven}tt,1215 19wAth Avenue9$2Q8 S.E Date `,59. D Op. Number of pages including cover sheet V-- To: From: M rkt-kM � O :M cigunrY • Phone —Fax Phone • . Phone (425)74$-1506_ CC: Fax Phone (425) 337 -4180 REMARKS. Urgent it For your review Reply ASAP 0 Please comment (] ED All? CA t ts- S P'W1Cl "l rt0 W0967t--O5)' 14Mc)rt Orif' C,1--01 f„d°\-T U'LVtt#6 t -�c��t f'ui UP -r n Fr\oNi 101 ori'a cam- Mil 011 A U I.1--Dt 'CC C t2e. . N/A/A " LOG ITEM # -q FROM : ARCA ARCHITECTURE PHONE NO. : 4253374180 May. 08 1998 12:30PM P2 . okp RoctP 5` C.Q. M 11.00 PI 5. Sc. 1 Ito 'To 12 bVwpI&re. 14614t T ioN00 44001 0 t4061kffleit 1e S, A eemeNir M 4 98•05.0E). moo+ u•r.c '94 r I•11 pgmwsrloNS) F.----7.±.—._ YI Is 20utiw++e, Nlina RT. . $to srarJ .0. eo Ivo s4�r1 — `o 4f4riitio3, ,Taal 'baa. a a w' {,,.sIp1200#Rc. 41404146 •,• �. v" — — -- clitAtift FarrA. u...c. ill- fk-t-4 106Pt 0%411 DM$ .) et tow p'` q 6•o5.06 �. Arca fArchitecture �;IL�0 & e s Uribagn D 1115 s.Tr1^VENUES L E'1 SETT jw*9I2Oa ♦1:1I.1• k500 ( 'j JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 <,4gSO a' FAX TRANSMITTAL - DATE: i /fit{ 8, I c7clS he i X E MIA EMI al ai D S $ lLr TO: 4(401-0 SLA-al< AC-eol PHONE: ( `125) 7113" /GOO FAX: ( (17'>) '7"4/80 NUMBER OF PAGES cove*' FROM: v/ '/2 V S/l(Iii . JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER PHONE: (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 SUBJECT: A- 6-'v.,6 -- UU/C1J/A16- IL?/C/ COMMENTS: ,41r4 I et) APE s t'eLr/✓e /4,406-,i-Al /,(/Pn U,t) £r,d7 ; 'A&Y-1A/17t o k 3 4 CE-4-77a V 7 - (//9 / C E5 II 1 2. ; ` 4b, t,J. . A)TLk'Pk bf 7ONS • a/34G 173. z7 Building Environmental Health Development Review Public Works Building Permits Septic Permits Subdivision, Zoning Road Approach 379-4450 Water Review & Shoreline Permits " Permits &Addresses Inspection Hotline LOG 1 E= 379-4450 379-4463 379-4450 379-4455 1-Rnn-Rni-9R7R FAX: (2061379-4451 i• i SHORELINE MANAGEMENT II MASTER �I PROGRAM FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY AND PORT TOWNSEND," WASHINGTON ADOPTED MARCH 7, 1989 WITH REVISIONS AUGUST 16, 1993 11 AUGUST 26, 1996 FEBRUARY 6, 1998 References to the City of Port Townsend no longer apply to the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program t F 1 53. Height: A measurement from average grade level to the highest point of a structure. -- Television antennas, chimneys, and similar appurtenances are not used in calculating height, except where they obstruct the view of a substantial number of residences, or ere this Master Program provides otherwise. Temporary construction equipment is used in calculating height. 54. Historic: Having considerable importance or influence in history; historical. 55. Industry: The production, processing, manufacturing, or fabrication of goods or materials. Warehousing and storage of materials or production is considered part of the industrial process. . 56. Inner harbor line: A line located and established in navigable tidal waters between the line of ordinary high tide and the outer harbor line and constituting the inner boundary of the harbor area. 57. Island: A land mass completely surrounded by water. 58. Jetty: A structure generally perpendicular to the shore, extending through or past the • intertidal zone. Jetties are built singly or in pairs at a harbor entrance or river mouth mainly to prevent accretion from littoral drift in an entrance channel, which may or may not be dredged. Jetties also serve to protect channels from storm waves or cross currents and to stabilize inlets through barrier beaches. On the Pacific Coast, most jetties are of rip-rapped, mound construction. 59. Lake: A body of standing water located inland, generally distinguished from marshes, bogs, and swamps by its greater depth. 60. Landfill: The creation of or addition to a dry upland area by depositing material into i waters or onto shorelines or wet land areas. I 61. Marina: A facility that provides launching, storage, supplies, moorage, and other ! accessory services for six or more pleasure and/or commercial water craft. 1 62. Marsh: An area of low-lying wet land; a fen, swamp, or bog. [reference WAC 173-22]. I 63. Master Program: The comprehensive management plan for a described shoreline and 1water surface area and the use regulation together with maps, diagrams, charts, or other descriptive material and text; a statement of desired goals and standards developed in accordance with the policies enunciated in RCW 90.58.020 and its guidelines under I1 WAC 173-16 and 173-27. 64. Mining: The removal of naturally occurring rock, sand, gravel, and minerals from the earth. 65. Natural: A shoreline possessing unique or fragile features, whether natural or cultural, that are totally or essentially unaltered from their natural state or are relatively intolerant of human use other than for passive historical, cultural, scientific, t archaeological, or educational activity. 1 66. Natural or existing topography: The topography of the lot, parcel, or tract of real property immediately prior to any site preparation or grading, including excavation or filling. 67. Non-conforming use or development: A shoreline use or development which was lawfully constructed or established prior to the effective date of the act or the applicable master program, or amendments thereto, but which does not conform to present regulations or standards of the program. 68. Offshore: The sloping subtidal area seaward from the low tideland. 6. Applicable Master Program: The Master Program approved or adopted by the Washington State Department of Ecology pursuant to RCW 90.58.090 or RCW 90.58.190. 7. Aquaculture: The culture or farming of food fish, shellfish, or other aquatic plants or animals. 8. Aquatic: All water bodies, including marine waters, lakes, rivers, and streams and their respective water columns and underlying lands, which are defined as shorelines of the state. 9. Archaeology: The systematic recovery by scientific methods of material evidence remaining from man's life and culture in past ages, and the detailed study of this evidence. 10. Associated wet lands: Those marshes, bogs, swamps and similar water retention areas that are in proximity to and influence or are influenced by streams, rivers, lakes, or tidal waters [reference WAC 173-22-030(5)as amended]. 11. Backshore: The area wetted by storm tides but normally dry between the coastline and the high tide line. It may be a narrow gravel berm below a sea bluff or a broader com1p ex of berms, marshes, meadows, or dunes landward of the high tide line. ( Average grade level: The average of the natural or existing topography of the portion of the lot, parcel, or tract of real property that will be directly under the proposed building or structure. In the case of structures to be built over the water, the average grade level shall be the elevation of the ordinary high water. The calculation of the average grade level shall be made by averaging the elevations at the midpoint of the __proposed building or structure.* [*See Administrative Interpretation, Page 107] A- 13. 13. Barrier beach: An accretion shore form of sand and gravel that has been deposited by longshore drift, like storm barriers, in front of bluffs, bays, marshes, and estuaries. � 9 BLUFF BARRIER BEACH N ' s .�l11 1III U iU�f I► � .hnI BLUFF LOW TIDE-�� e4e� ��JII�y 1,-Ne. • . (3�N • HIGH TIDE \\> SERM._ kk 6 •• JEFFERSON COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT _ Orr N. Long-Range Planning and Growth Management Jefferson County Courthouse P.O. Box 1220 Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 385-9123 FAX: (360) 385-9357 1-800-831-2678 March 10, 1998 To:Shoreline Management Master Program Intereste'. '. ies Fr: Al Scalf, Director of Community Development � -c--- Re:Administrative Interpretations The Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program is subject to the following administrative interpretations: 1. Section 2.12 - Definition of average grade level Calculation of the average grade level of a structure shall be applied by averaging the ground elevations at the midpoint of all exterior walls of the proposed building or structure. 2. Section 2.92 -Definition of shorelands Under state law, shoreline jurisdiction may extend beyond 200 feet landward of the Ordinary High Water Mark or the floodway to include associated wetlands. 3. Section 3.402 (11) Exemptions State law allows exemptions for docks in fresh water which do not exceed $10,000 in cost or fair market value, if the proposed dock otherwise meets the requirements of this exemption. If subsequent construction having a fair market value exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars occurs within five years of completion of the prior construction, the subsequent construction shall be considered a substantial development. 4. Section 9.202 —Permit Appeals State law requires that petitions for review by the shorelines hearings board of a permit decision pursuant to RCW 90.58.140 must be filed within twenty-one (21) days of the date of filing as defined in RCW 90.58.140(6). Within seven days of the filing of any petition for review with the board, the petitioner shall serve copies of the petition on the 107 department and the office of the attorney general. The department and the attorney general may intervene to protect the public interest and insure that the provisions of this chapter are complied with at any time within fifteen days from the date of the receipt by the department or the attorney general of a copy of the petition for review. The shorelines hearings board shall schedule review proceedings on the petition for review without regard as to whether the period for the department or the attorney general to intervene has or has not expired. The department or the attorney general may obtain review of any final decision granting a permit, or granting or denying an application for a permit issued by a local government by filing a written petition with the shorelines hearings board and the appropriate local government within twenty-one days from the date the final decision was filed, as provided in RCW 90.58.140(6). • 108 _- Chapter 173-27 WAC - SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PERMIT AND ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES WAC (Statutory Authority: RCW 90.58.140(3)and[90.581.200. 96-20-075 . PART I (Order 95-17),§ 173-27-010,filed 9/30/96,effective 10/31/96.1 PERMITS FOR DEVELOPMENT ON SHORELINES OF THE STATE 173-27-010 Authority. WAC 173-27-020 . Purpose. RCW 90.58.140(3) 173-27-020 Purpose. requires local governments to establish a program, consistent 173-27-030 Definitions. with rules adopted by the department of ecology, for the 173-27-040 Developments exempt from substantial development administration and enforcement of the permit system for . permit requirement. 173-27-050 Letter of exemption. shoreline management. The local program should be 173-27-060 Applicability of chapter 90.58 RCW to federal lands and integrated with other local government systems for adminis- agencies. tration and enforcement of land use regulations. It is the 173-27-070 Application of the permit system to substantial develop- intent of these regulations to provide minimum procedural menu undertaken prior to the effective date of the as requirements as necessary to comply with statutory require- 173-27-080 Nonconforming use and development standards. ments while providing latitude for local government to 173-27-090 Time requirements of permit. • establish procedural systems based on local needs and 173-27-100 Revisions to permits. ' circumstances. It is also the intent of these regulations to 173-27-110 Notice required. 173-27-120 Special procedures for limited utility extensions and provide for integration of the shoreline permit into a consoli- bulkheads. dated environmental review and permit process. 173-27-130 Filing with department This regulation is drafted to also reflect RCW 90.58.050 173-27-140 Review criteria for all development which provides that the Shoreline Management Act is 173-27-150 Review criteria for substantial development permits. intended to establish a cooperative program between local 73-27-160 Review criteria for conditional use permits. .73-27-170 Review criteria for variance permits. government and the state. According to this provision, local . 173-27-180 Application requirements for substantial development, government shall have the primary responsibility for initiat- conditional use,or variance permit ing the planning required by the act and administering the - 173-27-190 Permits for substantial development.conditional use,or regulatory program of shoreline management consistent with variance. 173-27-200 Department review of conditional use and variance the policy and provisions of the act, whereas the department permits. shall act primarily in a supportive and review capacity with 173-27-210 Minimum standards for conditional use and variance an emphasis on providing assistance to local government and permits. on insuring compliance with the policies and provisions of 173-27-220 Requests for review. the Shoreline Management Act. PART II SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT ENFORCEMENT [Statutory Authority: RCW 90.58.140(3)and [90.581.200. 96.20-075 (Order 95-17),§ 173-27-020,filed 9/30/96.effective 10/31/96.1 173-27-240 Authority and purpose. 173-27-250 Definitions. WAC 173-27-030 Definitions. The following Policy. owg 173-27-270 Order to cease and desist definitions shall apply: 173-27-280 Civil penalty. • (1) "Act" means chapter 90.58 RCW, the Shoreline 173-27-290 Appeal of civil penalty. Management Act of 1971, as amended; 173-27-300 Criminal raalty. 173-27-310 Oil or gas exploration —Penalty. (2) "Applicable master program" means the master 173-27-990 Appendix A. program approved or adopted by the department pursuant to RCW 90.58.090(6)-or 90.58.190(4) prior to acceptance of a PART I complete application by local government; PERMITS FOR DEVELOPMENT ON SHORELINES (3) "Average grade level" means the average of the OF THE STATE natural or existing topography of the portion of the lot, parcel,or tract of real property which will be directly under WAC 173-27-010 Authority. The provisions of this the proposed building or structure: In the case of structures • part implement the requirements of chapter 90.58 RCW, the to be built over water, average grade level shall be the Shoreline Management Act. Specifically, RCW 90.58.200 elevation of the ordinary high water mark. Calculation of authorizes the adoption of rules as necessary to implement the average grade level shall be made by averaging the ere provisions of the act and RCW 9058.140(3)requires that ground elevations at the midpoint of alI exterior walls of the the department adopt rules for administration and roposed building or structure; ment of the permit system established by the act. "Conditional use" means a use, development, or substantial development which is classified as a conditional use or is not classified within the applicable master program; (9130/96) [Ch.173-27 WAC—p.1] • SECTION 7 VARIANCES SECTIONS 7.10 General Variances 7.20 Administrative Variances 7.10 GENERAL VARIANCES Deviation from the design standards contained in this Master Program may be permitted by variance. Uses which are prohibited within a shoreline environment may not otherwise be permitted without an amendment to this Master Program. l not be authorized. uses may be considered as a conditional use provided prohibited uses sh Variances from standards contained herein may be permitted where there are extraordinary or unique circumstances relating to the property such that the strict implementation of the Master Program would impose unnecessary hardships on the applicant or thwart the purpose and goals set forth in Section 1 of this Master Program. 7.101 APPLICATION A variance request shall be submitted in writing to the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department and shall be considered an integral part of the permit application. The request shall include the variance requested and shall contain a statement of the applicant's justification based on the applicable review criteria and or findings under Subsection 7.103 below. 7.102 PUBLIC HEARING • The Jefferson- County Hearing Examiner shall conduct a public hearing ongeneral forth intiance this requests of which notice shall be made in accordance with requirements set Master Program. 7.103 REVIEW 1. Variance applications for developments that will be located landward of the ordinary high water mark and not within areas defined herein as marshes, bogs, or swamps may 88 be authorized provided the applicant can demonstrate Items 1 through 6 of Subsection 7.104. In addition, the applicant must demonstrate that the strict application of the standards set forth in this Master Program precludes or significantly interferes with a reasonable permitted use of the property. 2. Variance applications for developments that will be located either waterward of the ordinary high water mark or within marshes, bogs, or swamps, as defined in this Master Program, may be authorized .provided the applicant can demonstrate Items 1 through 6 of Subsection 7.104. In addition, the applicant must demonstrate that: a. The strict application of the standards set forth in this Master Program precludes a reasonable permitted use of the property; and b. The public rights of navigation and use of the shorelines will not be adversely affected by the granting of the variance. 7.104 CRITERIA In reviewing a variance application, the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners or Port Townsend City Council shall make the following findings: 1. The hardship, as described in either Item 1 or 2 above, is specifically related to the property and is the result of unique conditions such as irregular lot shape, size, or natural features and the application of this Master Program and not, for example, from deed restrictions or the applicant's own actions. 2. The design of the project will be compatible with other permitted activities in the area and will not cause adverse effects to adjacent properties or the shoreline environment. 3. The variance authorized does not constitute a grant of special privilege not enjoyed by the other properties in the area, and will be the minimum necessary to afford relief. { 4. The public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect. 5. The variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this Master Program. 6. In the granting of all variance applications, consideration shall be given to the cumulative impact of additional requests for similar actions in the area. For example, if variances where granted to other developments in the area where similar circumstances exist, the total of the variances should also remain consistent with the purpose, goals, and policies of this Master Program and should not produce substantial adverse effects to the shoreline environment. In addition to the above criteria, applicants for variances from the public access requirements of this Master Program shall demonstrate that one or more of the following conditions exist which cannot otherwise be mitigated: a. The provision will result in an unacceptable hazard to the public. • i b. The inherent security requirements of the development preclude access consideration. c. The cost of the access amenity is unreasonably disappropriate to the total cost of the development. d. The provision of access will result in unacceptable environmental harm. e. A significant and unavoidable conflict with adjacent uses will occur. 7.105 APPROVAL In order to comply with the Shoreline Management Act, any requests for general variances will be submitted to the Washington State Department of Ecology for approval, approval with conditions, or disapproval. The department shall render and transmit its decision to the applicant and'Jefferson County or the City of Port Townsend within thirty (30) days of receipt of the final action. Construction may not begin until thirty (30) days has elapsed from the date the department has transmitted its approval to the applicant and Jefferson County or the City of Port Townsend. 7.20 ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCES Variances from the administrative procedures portion of this Master Program (Section 6) or residential setbacks (Subsection 5.160) may be granted by the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner or Port Townsend City Council upon recommendation of the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department or Port Townsend Shoreline Administrator when the board or council is assured the variance is in keeping with the general intent of this Master Program and the Shoreline Management Act. In doing so, either body may require special conditions, which in their judgment will substantially secure the administrative procedures or requirements so varied. • 90 SON cc 4. ,y� `� ‘4. , moo JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER 17, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 1fING ° April 30, 1998 Alan B. Clark, AIA ARCA Silver Lake House 11125 Nineteenth Avenue SE Everett, WA 98208 Re: Application for Minor Revision - Lands End (LP08-92, IZ46-93 & SDP92-0015) Dear Allan: It was a pleasure meeting with you on Friday, April 24, 1998 to review the progress of review related to the above shoreline permit revision. As I have now had an opportunity to spend more time reviewing the application and your letter dated April 24, 1998, I made a couple of notes. Your finely crafted letter on page 1, paragraph 2 states -"As you are aware,we have had an ongoing dialogue with the Department of Ecology for the State of Washington and are pleased to attach the department's letter of support for the revisions proposed." Neither of the copies of the Area letter dated April 24, 1998 had the referenced letter attached to it. Would you be kind enough to forward a copy of the referenced letter to the Permit Center at your earliest convenience? Page 2 of the same letter, paragraph 3 states - "Attached hereto is a Shoreline Plan that has been developed in concert with Jeffree Stewart of the Department of Ecology." Perhaps I have overlooked the referenced "Shoreline Plan". Also, would you be kind enough to send a copy of the Shoreline Plan that has been developed in concert with Jeffree Stewart ? If the above documents are not yet available, please indicate when we could expect to receive them. Thank you for your assistance. I am looking forward to working with you on this revision application. Sincerely 7 Jerry Smith Associate Planner Building Environmental Health Development Review Public Works Building Permits Permits Subdivision, Zoning Road Approach Inspections I.O r Review & Shoreline Permits Permits & Addresses (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 1 • �1 Fit_ T 0s,, •ktimi .• //„..f_ufr,4 gzs _ .( (A^A±L,e,r,j- /eat&e" Lf4,- -17 ct 1°-1". ki 372" . 2 r , c 4¢ q iSo cc. • LOG ITEM . , ail Arca April 24, 1996 Jefferson County Permit Center 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend,Washington 98368 Att: Mr. Al Scalf Director Community Development Mr.Jerry Smith Associate Planner Ref: Application for Minor Revision PP Sion APR 2 4 198 Lands End ...where adventure begins LP08-92,IZ46-93, SDP92-00I5 ---_____.__ ___ .. -- Gentlemen; Further to our many discussions regarding the characteristics that define the Master Plan for Lands End,we forward herewith our final report. This information presented herein is to be appended to the Lands End Project Profile(11.5 x 17)and the Canoe Cove Appendix that were submitted with the original application in May 1997. As we hope you will agree,the plan for Lands End is one that seeks to improve on all aspects of the original plan filed in 1992 as Canoe Cove. As you are aware, we have had an ongoing dialogue with the Department of Ecology for the State of Washington and are pleased to attach the department's letter of support for the revisions proposed. This support is conditioned upon certain aspects of the plan being incorporated as an integral part of the plan at recording of final plat. As a preface to the application, it is fair to say that there is general consensus that the plan for Lands End constitutes a"net"advantage to the community in very many respects, not the least of which is its consideration for the immediate environmental context, in the broadest sense, and its consideration for the aesthetic and architectural improvement to the site. Where the differences to the Canoe Cove plan appear to present the greatest departure from such approved plan, and therefore suggest that perhaps it is not really a minor revision, requires your most careful consideration. It is these very differences that constitute the greatest benefit. ARCHITECTURE & URBAN DESIGN CORPORATION Silver Lake House 11215 Nineteenth Avenue SE Everett. Washington 98208 Tel: (206) 743-1500 Fax: (206)337-4180 LOG I 1 E 980424 # Jefferson County 98.04.24 Page 2 A case in point is the relocation of three Canoe Cove buildings from the highest elevation of the property to the lowest elevation where the Canoe Cove plan provided for open space. Unfortunately,the Canoe Cove plan made no provision for the Marina and its attendant parking and servicing; an existing element which has also been the subject of at least two(2) Shoreline Permits. Is it not therefore fair to say that the so called open space of the Canoe Cove Plan,with its open parking lot for Marina patrons only, can best be characterized as simply "residual"space,not having been either contemplated or articulated as "useable"open space? This area was the subject of much discussion with the Department of Ecology, and,their support for the plan for Lands End is predicated largely on the opportunity the"revisions" present for improvement to the riparian and marine values that are critical to the inherent and natural values associated with this land. Attached hereto is a Shoreline Plan that has been developed in concert with Jeffree Stewart of the Department of Ecology. It has been agreed that the riparian bluff lands that separate the Villas by the Sea from the tidal beach be protected as much as possible. Accordingly the placement of structures on the remaining bluff lots will be further restricted than previously approved such that the southerly line of vegetation be the setback line for structures including decks,wherever reasonably possible. The CC&R's for the Villas by the Sea Plat will be so amended to accomplish this objective and condition of approval. The Shoreline Plan also makes provision for the westward extension of the riparian bluff vegetation toward the Terraced Garden(cultivated native growth and Rhododendron species)and Reflecting Fountain Pool indicated in the plan for Lands End. Lots One(1)through Five(5)and Lot Twenty Five(25)will be vacated to facilitate the implementation of the plan for Lands End. West of the Marina gangway a Seaside Park will be developed so as to provide both passive and active recreation areas. The tidal beach will be separated from the cultivated lands by a Boardwalk to be constructed of timber and stone. The Boardwalk design will feature "nodes of interest"that will provide interpretive graphics and language to explain the ecological characteristics of the tidal lands,the riparian wetlands and the marine estuaries. These nodes of interest will also provide places to sit and look at the marine environment. Marine habitat will also be featured. The historical profile of the lands will document the use of the lands by the native peoples,most notably,the Tsetsibus. The development of the site for the manufacturing of wood alcohol at the turn of the century will be a featured interpretive are within the complex. Care will be taken to ensure that the"view corridors"shown on the plan are not compromised. LE-JC980424 Jefferson County 98.04.24 Page 3 We have recently revisited the landscape plan for the Villas by the Sea plat and have amended same with your approval. This amendment also constitutes a significant improvement to the plat and one that must also be incorporated into the CC&R's for the Villas by the Sea, as a condition of approval. A matrix for comparison that was a part of the Lands End Project Profile is summarized as follows: Lands End Canoe Cove Land Area 23.5 Acres 23.5 Acres Impervious Cover 234,212 SF 243,020 SF Total Residential Units 141 141 Single Detached Villas 18 1 Multiple Dwelling Buildings 4 21 Total Parking Provided 516 Spaces 162 Spaces Open Parking 115 Spaces 117 Spaces Covered Parking 401 Spaces 45 Spaces Parking Variance No Yes Vehicular Circulation Yes No Marina Integration Yes No Marina Slips 154 NIC Marina Parking 125 Spaces None Marina Services Covered Open Specific Services Provision Yes No Building Count 24 25 Buildings South of ALR None 3 LE-JC980424 Jefferson County 98.04.24 Page 4 Building Code Compliance Yes No Parking Spaces South of ALR None 70 Maximum Building Height 70 Feet 60 Feet Existing Building Height 70 Feet 70 Feet Maximum Geodetic Height 110 Feet 130 Feet Existing Geodetic Height 90 Feet 110 Feet Articulated Open Space Yes No Boardwalk Yes No Environmental Graphics Yes No Wetland Enhancement Yes No Project Landscaping Yes No SeaSide Park Yes No Development in SF Zone No Yes View Corridors Yes No Setback Variances None Several Landscape Covenants Yes None Building Materials Masonry/Cement Plaster Not Identified Pedestrian Corridors Two Primary None Pedestrian Dominant Zones Yes No Land Use Zoning Yes No Activity Zoning Yes No Comprehensive Planning Yes No Approach Vistas Yes No LE-JC980424 Jefferson County 98.04.24 Page 5 For convenience,the following excerpta is provided here from the Lands End Project Profile: To establish a context for the evaluation of the plan for Lands End,the approved Canoe Cove plan must be analyzed. The Canoe Cove plan is, by reference to project documentation, a preliminary plan. It is apparent that much was yet to be resolved in order to truly define the characteristics of the project..Accordingly, it is reasonable to expect a certain degree of change as the project moves through the permitting processes which interface the original plan with the changes that have been made to County ordinances; as well as to the Uniform Building Code. Our analysis of the approved plan for Canoe Cove is presented so as to provide a basis for comparison and determination of net benefit. To be fair to the plan for Canoe Cove, it must be recognized that it is a preliminary plan and that it did not try to be more than that. Our comments are not therefore to be construed as a criticism of the plan but a means of defining the principal characteristics that constitute the plan; summarized as follows: • The Canoe Cove plan provides for a total of twenty five(25)buildings widely dispersed throughout the site. Six(6)of the twenty five(25)are"principal"buildings,the balance being composed of buildings which range from two(2)to five(5)attached residential units. • Three(3)of the five(5)principal buildings are located south of Alcohol Loop Road(ALR) at a point that represents the highest geodetic elevation of the site. These three buildings are also fifty(50)feet in height. You will note from the site profiles provided herein that the top floor of these structures, as relocated in the plan for Lands End,are at a point roughly equivalent to the ground floor of the highest Canoe Cove buildings in their location south of ALR. • The three(3)buildings identified as Building Type E on the Canoe Cove plan are located adjacent to lands that are zoned for single family residences. For some reason,the plan sought and was granted yard variances to make the buildings fit into the"slot"of land south of Alcohol Loop Road. • The west wing of the Old Alcohol Plant,the largest mass on the site,was to be retained. Pursuant to the plan it was to accommodate residential units in addition to the banquet, meeting room, lounge and restaurant facilities that it provides today. The building also houses a pari-mutuel gaming lounge on the mezzanine level. The building is approximately 60 feet in height at its highest point and utilized an in-situ concrete post and beam system that today is in a rather poor physical state. Constructed in 1911 as a wood alcohol manufacturing facility,the building does not have sufficient structural integrity or seismic capacity to justify its continuing existence. Moreover,the building is largely unused and does not comply with current codes. It is the opinion of the architect that a conversion of nQ_a LE-JC980424 Jefferson County • 98.04.24 Page 7 • Due most likely to the preliminary nature of the plan, water quality and stormwater issues are not addressed. In conclusion,the plan for Canoe Cove can be characterized by a general lack of plan organization, land use zoning within the site, activity zoning, building orientation and linkage for both pedestrian and automobile within the project. The net result would appear to be a project that, perhaps even to its proponents, falls far short of its intended objective. It is therefore much less than it could otherwise be. A summary comparative analysis of the foregoing characteristics of Canoe Cove with that of Lands End is provided in the lands End Project Profile under the tab"Comparative Analysis". The approach to crafting a plan for Lands End requires a recognition and careful analysis of the many facets that create this beautiful site. What we see as particularly relevant is how we can improve on the Canoe Cove plan for the benefit of the project and the benefit of the community it serves. The project will, after all, have a life span of at least one hundred years. Our challenge has been to work within the parameters of the existing approved plan and to the provisions of Ordinance No. 08-0408-96 entitled"Optional Consolidated Permit Review Process". The plan also recognizes the Villas by the Sea plat recorded in 1997. The project plan for Lands End is illustrated under the tab"Site Plan Lands End"and can be expressed as follows: • The primary form determinant for the plan of Lands End is the natural land form itself. The land slopes downward to the shoreline in both the northerly and westerly direction thereby affording the opportunity to locate and stack the parking requirements for almost all the project components in a very confined and central area. • Taking this approach then allows the clustering of the principal project components around the parking and service areas, much of which are now covered. The land form is employed to provide varying points of access(along Oak Street/ALR)to the parking areas in a manner that eliminates the need for any internal ramps. • The parking areas are naturally illuminated by the terracing effect on the east elevation and by the openings to Port Townsend Bay on the north elevation. • Access to the Marina is highly controlled and the boat launch is eliminated. This condition enables the creation of a"pedestrian dominant zone" in the shoreline area that is otherwise overtaken by the activities and parking of Marina patrons. LE-JC980424 • Jefferson County • 98.04.24 Page 8 • Marina parking as well as Marina Services are located on the Level 14 and Level 24 of the Project Plan. Marina services include storage lockers, locker rooms, change and shower facilities, laundry facilities,restrooms, care room, and small convenience store. • Project services are located on Level 36, a level that has a floor to floor height of sixteen feet;thereby allowing entry of essentially all service vehicles including garbage disposal trucks and delivery vans. • The interface between the parking areas and the habitable spaces is a highly articulated Pedestrian Spine on the east/west axis that provides linkage throughout the project while simultaneously creating a strong and positive outdoor open space experience. The pedestrian spine also provides a means of transition between the various project levels emanating from the land form and facilitates access to vertical circulation systems. This corridor is a strong point of interest throughout the project, providing a"path"and place of meeting for the project population. • Also of note is the placement of the buildings such that view corridors are opened to and from the Shorelines,the Marina, and Port Townsend Bay. Building cost criteria would suggest the consolidation of the three small"Bayview"buildings into one larger building; but then we would lose much of the interface with the shoreline if this cost approach were adopted. • The largest mass within the plan for Lands End is the Mansion at Lands End, located in the same position as the east wing of the existing complex. The Mansion begins at Level 36 and extends through to the"dormered"roof spaces on Level 96. An east/west oriented wing has been added to consolidate project density. • It is interesting to note that this point of highest density on the site is adjacent and across from lands which are a part of this application.. Suffice to say, any impact of this particular building is largely mitigated by its location. View corridors are now open from all lands to the south. • One approaches the project from both Charles Street and George Street and by reference to the plan one can see that these"approach vistas"are particularly long. The approach to the Mansion along George Street culminates in a landscaped plaza that serves as a reception and drop-off area. • The Reception Center which is essentially replacing the banquet and meeting facilities of the existing building is located adjacent the Mansion in a manner that allows for the pick up and drop-off of persons that may be attending a wedding or Port Hadlock Rotary Meeting, separate from the traffic using the central plaza. LE-JC980424 • Jefferson County 98.04.24 Page 9 • Located on Level 36 is the Health Club &Spa as well as the principal building services for the complex as a whole. • The Pavilion Lands End is situated over the Marina Services area and is the intended location for a primary restaurant and lounge. Such building is located along the pedestrian spine to provide easy access from the project parking areas, the Shorelines, the Lands End community, and the Port Hadlock community at large. • Because the principal building components are clustered around the servicing and circulation infrastructure for the project; such servicing areas and parking access is significantly more efficient. Impervious cover is greatly reduced with a corresponding reduction in the environmental impact normally associated with service and parking areas. Calculations setting out the differences between Canoe Cove and Lands End are provided. The increase in parking spaces provided in the Lands End plan notwithstanding, impervious cover areas are considerably less for the lands end project. • The largest structures are located furthest from the single family zoned lands and because of the land form and the variable grade elevation, said structures appear much lower from the single family zoned lands. • It follows that the views from such lands are also much less impeded. • The open space network for Lands End is intended to be a means of linking the various elements of the project, both natural and man-made. • Architectural sketches are provided to illustrate the intended architectural character of the project. The placement of buildings and contextual elements such as the pedestrian spine and landscaped gardens are collectively a choreography of form, color and texture that constitute an architecture that is appropriate for this extraordinary site. • As demonstrated by the Villa San Juan(now constructed), split-face and saw-cut limestone is a primary building component. The lower levels of the project will use a heavier textured limestone at a scale that will provide the desired effect ... that the buildings look like they belong and have "perhaps"been there a long time. The plan for Lands End.. where adventure begins has made a sincere effort to become an asset to its host community. LE-JC980424 Jefferson County 98.04.24 Page 10 For conditions of approval which are to be addressed at the time of the recording of the final plat to the satisfaction of the Director, we wish to suggest the following: 1. That the Plan for Lands End be a binding site plan, and 2. That the documents entered for the recording of the final plat be sufficiently detailed so as to give effect to the plan as submitted, and 3. That the amendments and further provisions of the revised landscape plan for the Villas by the Sea plat be recorded in the CC&R's for the Villas by the Sea plat, and 4. That the provisions contained within the Shoreline Plan that has been developed in concert with the Department of Ecology be further developed and form an integral part and condition to the issuance of Shoreline Permits in the future. As we are also seeking a renewal or extension to the existing Shoreline Permit,the provisions of the Shoreline Plan are to be incorporated as a condition of approval. In our discussions and evaluations we have been mindful of the principal cutters by which this application for a Minor Revision is to be judged. We wish to address these four basic points set out in the Optional Consolidated Review Process, Ordinance No. 08-0408-96, Jefferson County; as follows: 1. Change to proposed land use: The plan for Lands End, contains no land uses that were not contained in the original approval for the Canoe Cove application. even as already amended by the Villas by the Sea plat 2. Substantially greater floor area or number of residential units: The plan for Lands End provides for no greater habitable floor area than that contained in the approved Canoe Cove plan and further, provides only for the same 141 residential units approved for Canoe Cove, even as already amended by the Villas by the Sea plat. 3. Substantial relocation of uses or structures: The plan for Lands End is partly in response to the Villas by the Sea plat which of itself greatly amended the Canoe Cove plan. To achieve the approved and remaining residential density the plan consolidated the project into a more compact area around a service and parking core that greatly reduced the impact on both environment and adjacent residential properties. Such impacts would have been considerable if the Canoe Cove plan would have been implemented. For greater certainty, use locations within the plan for Lands End have not changed, however, minor changes have occurred in the site specific densities to give effect to the many improvements that the plan now provides. We believe it fair to say that the word"substantial"must be interpreted within the context of the plan. For the most part, all development within the plan for Lands End represents a consolidation and a"shrinking"away from the adjacent lands owned by others. LE-JC980424 • Jefferson County 98.04.24 Page 11 4. Change that would probably result in significantly different impacts to the environment, upon public services or facilities, or to neighboring properties or land uses: There is no question that the plan for Lands End constitutes significant change of the impact of the project on the environment,the public good, neighboring properties and neighboring land uses. These changes are significant indeed and extremely positive in every respect. For all of the reasons contained within this submittal the plan for Lands End is a plan that is worthy of your favorable consideration and support. Arca and Tillman Engineering have enjoyed the deliberations and discussions that have culminated in the preparation of this application. We have appreciated the assistance and cooperation that has been afforded by you and your staff. Thank you for your attention herein. Si cerely, • 1.a Tillman Engineering it%cture& Urban Design Corporation Alan B. Clark AIA Ryan Tillman P.Eng. Principal Principal LE-JC980424 Jefferson County 98.04.24 Page 6 this mass to a more efficient and aesthetically attractive space would better serve the project as well as the interests of the community. • A factor of great importance that is not sufficiently addressed on the plan for Canoe Cove is that of parking. It appears that the parking provided for the smaller attached residential units is adequate because of individual garages and driveways, however,the parking provided for the larger condominium and commercial components is not only inadequate but difficult to access. The largest parking component for the project is once again located adjacent the adjoining lands that are zoned for single family residences. As the parking area so designed is accessed from only one point,the headlights, noise and the general intrusion of a large parking area in one's backyard is inescapable. • Parking for the restaurant, recreation and health club in the Canoe Cove plan appears to be a total of only nineteen (19) spaces. The plan shows parking spaces directly off Alcohol Loop Road. Such a condition of parking directly off a thoroughfare would suggest that one may park anywhere. • The parking ratio for the larger condominium residences on the plan is very close to a 1:1 ratio. Current market criteria requires a minimum of 1.5:1. • The servicing and parking requirements for the Marina are not indicated. • Traffic circulation for the Canoe Cove plan is lacking because there is no indication as to where one should in fact be going, a fact which is exacerbated because there is likely to be no parking space found when one gets there. • The plan for Canoe Cove does not address the servicing needs of the project. Guest parking, refuse containers, loading zones and such are very much a reality and must be located and designed to ensure proper use while mitigating any negative impacts that may arise as a function of their intended use. • Because of the dispersed nature of the project components coupled with a lack of parking there is ample opportunity for conflict and a lack of control. • The plan does not,to a large extent, recognize the different needs and interests of the site residents versus those of the more transient boaters and commercial patrons. • The open space considerations of the Canoe Cove plan appear to be more a function of what is"left over"as opposed to a networked delineation and articulation of"usable" open space. An overlay of the parking and loading facilities for the marina as well as the boat launch area very much changes what otherwise might be the open space character perceived from the plan. LE-JC980424 FROM : ARCA ARCHITECTURE PHONE NO. : 4253374180 Apr. 24 1998 12:00PM P2 04/23/98 05:23 4070284 00Z • Dalt letter fie Lands!Ind/Canoe Cove To Jefferson County it ARCA It seams ee are um complete with ow divctasious and alta nate.and axe coming close to an aseeptabic modified dsdgt lir Csaoe Cove,This letter admowledgaa my involvement.and specifies the ressioing details of camera. We note that tho now plans technically would Involve siesta than ten percent changes to what was odglo*approved for Saluda End. Hawcver,Ecology COMM with Jelibrsco Cooney that a revised Moralise permit should by conatidered acceptable under the obctuneastoes. Seesuso the applicants are agreeing to erten preservation of native sp rales through covenants for bleu zones,and because the new proposal Incudes colt tion of a boardwalk edmultaneceely protecting and enabling view access to wetland arab ow dense ttinstwst is made under the terms dihedral construction to Mot the purposes of tiro Mw. As I understand it. we are agreeing to help the applies with design*awes fbr the boardwalk Welland for interpretive sags rvgatding wetland tlutotiore and velum Prather design discussions are ahead to clarify acres fix ripatfaa p sntiogs relative to open space,recreations/areas.These designs will Ulu ata tho waterfront north of the main star tures over the beach We.rill by reviewing Mc spcdlic changes proposed for prutoctive covenants. we would also lace to discuss the placement of discrete,durable siga,agtc in the buffer tato tutus to servo as physical reminders of the restrictions or disruption to shoreline Alla.Jerzy.Ayaa,Debbie,Al.... Neese ht too know your ideas.limy. whatto add/change Theatre( Rabe G O L(V -r 02 s'4 FAX) 0423/98 05:15 4070284 002 Draft letter for LandsBnd/Canoe Cove To Jefferson County&ARCA It seems we are near complete with our discussions and site visits,and are coming close to an acceptable modified design for Canoe Cove.This letter acknowledges my involvement,and specifies the remaining details of concern. We note that the new plans technically would involve greater than ten percent changes to what was originally approved for Lands End. However,Ecology concurs with Jefferson County that a revised shoreline permit should be considered acceptable under the circuntstanoes. Because the applicants are agreeing to strengthen preservation of native species through covenants for buffer zones,and because the new proposal includes construction of a boardwalk simultaneously protecting and enabling view access to wetland noun,our determination is made under the terms of liberal construction to effort the pew/viva of the law. As t unaertaarin it, we are agreeing to help the applicants with design flaitruuar jun the l,umidwalk;tool/and for interpretive signage regarding wetland functions and values.Further design discussions are ahead to clarify areas for riparian plantings relative to open space/recreational areas.These designs will illustrate the waterfront north of the main structures near the beach.We will be reviewing the specific changes proposed for protective covenants. We would also like to discuss thy plat eutcnt of discrete,durable signage in the buffer zone areas to serve as physical reminders of the restrictions on disruption to shoreline vegetation. Alan,Jerry,Ryan,Debbie,Al.... Please let me know your ideas,if any, what to add/change? Thanks! POPO 360n r 1t 0.? ? LOG ITEM 04/23/98 05:14 4070284 001 FAX NUMBER .m..... FAX COVER SHEET Date: Time: #of rages: TO: c >„„? r FROM: P.rC.. v44 `-"- REMARKS: Washington Dept. of Ecology Southwest Regional Office P.O. Box 47775 Olympia, WA 98504-7775 Phone: (360)407-6300 FAX: 360 407-0284 APR 2 4 1998 Shoreline Management—Permits and Enforcement 173-27-080 other requirements of the applicable master program and the (5) Revisions to permits under WAC 173-27-100 may ,Ct. be authorized after original permit authorization has expired • t under subsection (2) of this section: Provided, That this iOrderory Authority: RCW 90.58.140(3)and(90.58).200. 96-20-075 procedure shall not be used.to extend the original permit -.7.:;-: (Order 95-17),§ 173-27-080,fated effective9f96, 10/31!96_] time requirements or to authorize substantial development after the time limits of the original permit. WAC 173-27-090 Time requirements of permit. (6) Local government shall notify the department in The following time requirements shall apply to all substantial writing of any change to the effective date of a permit, as development permits and to any development authorized authorized by this section, with an explanation of the basis pursuant to a variance or conditional use permit for approval of the change. Any change to the time limits (1)Upon a finding of good cause,based on the require- of a permit other than those authorized by this section shall ments and circumstances of the project proposed and require a new permit application. consistent with the policy and provisions of the master program and the act, local government may adopt appropri- (Statutory Authority: RCW 90.58.140(3)and[90.581.200. 96-20-075 ate time limits as a part of action on a substantial develop- (order 95-17),§ 173-27-090,filed 9/30196•effective 10(31/96.] ment permit and local government,with the approval of the department, may adopt appropriate time limits as a part of WAC 173-27-100 Revisions to permits. A permit action on a conditional use or variance permit: "Good cause revision is required whenever the applicant proposes substan- based on the requirements and circumstances of the project," five changes to the design, terms or conditions of a project shall mean that the time limits established are reasonably from that which is approved in the permit. Changes are related to the time actually necessary to perform the develop- substantive if they materially alter the project in a manner ment on the ground and complete the project that is being that relates to its conformance to the terms and conditions of permitted, and/or are necessary for the protection of shore- the permit, the master program and/or the policies and line resources. provisions of chapter 90.58 RCW. Changes which are not (2)Where neither local government nor the department substantive in effect do not require approval of a revision. include specific provisions establishing time limits on a When an applicant seeks to revise a permit, local permit as a part of action on the permit, the following time government shall request from the applicant detailed plans limits shall apply: and text describing the proposed changes. (a) Construction shall be commenced or, where no (1) If local government determines that the proposed construction is involved, the use or activity shall be corn- changes are within the scope and intent of the original menced within two years of the effective date of a shoreline permit," 'r,} oare consistent with the applicable master permit. Provided, that local government may authorize a program and the act, local government may approve a single extension for a period not to exceed one year based revision. and intent of the original permit" on reasonable factors, if a request for extension has been (2) "Within the scope filed before the expiration date and notice of the proposed means 1 f the following: ,Z u extension is given to parties of record and the department. (arNo additional over water construction is involved 0 (b) Authorization to conduct development activities shall except that pier, dock,or float construction may be increasedt�' terminate five years after the effective date of a shoreline by five hundred square feet or ten percent from the provi- tz permit. Provided, that local government may authorize a sions of the original permit, whichever is less; extension fora period not to exceed one year based (b) Ground area coverage and height may be increased 4 single on reasonable factors, if a request for extension has been a maximum of ten percent from the provisions of the filed before the expiration date and notice of the proposed original permit; extension is given to parties of record and the department. (c) The revised permit does not authorize development (3)The effective date of a shoreline permit shall be the to exceed height, lot coverage, setback, or any other require- date of the last action required on,-the shoreline permit and ments of the applicable master program except as authorized all other government permits and approvals that authorize the under a variance granted as the original permit or a part development to proceed, including all administrative and thereof; legal actions on any such permit or approval. It is the (d)Additional or revised landscaping is consistent with responsibility of the applicant to inform the local government any conditions attached to the original permit and with the of the pendency of other permit applications filed with applicable master program; agencies other than the local government and of any related (e)The use authorized pursuant to the original permit is administrative and legal actions on any permit or approval. not changed; and If no notice of the pendency of other permits or approvals is (f)No adverse environmental impact will be caused by given to the local government prior to the date established the project revision. by the shoreline permit or the provisions of this section, the (3)Revisions to permits may be authorized after original expiration of a permit shall be based on the shoreline permit permit authorization has expired under WAC 173-278+ (2). (4) When permit approval is based on conditions, such The purpose of such revisions shall be limited to authonza- conditions shall be satisfied prior to occupancy or use of a tion of changes which are consistent with this section and structure or prior to commencement of a nonstructural which would not require a permit for the development or activity: Provided That an alternative compliance limit may change proposed under the terms of chapter 90.58 RCW, this be specified in the permit. regulation and the local master program. If the proposed • change constitutes substantial development then a new '-/--7-‘-'%-9S. [Ch 173-27 WAC—p.7] (9130/96) C��1/G ,4-//a,, iimmimimimimimmimMMM k 173-27-100 Shoreline Management—Permits and Enforcement permit is required. Provided, this subsection shall not be (a) The date of application, the date of the notice of used to extend the time requirements or to authorize substan- completion for the application, and the date of the notice of tial development beyond the time limits of the original application; permit. (b) A description of the.proposed project action and a (4) If the sum of the revision and any previously list of the project permits included in the application and, if approved revisions under former WAC 173-14-064 or this applicable, a list of any studies requested under RCW section violate the provisions in subsection (2) of this 36.70B.070, 36.70B.090 and WAC 173-27-180; • section, local government shall require that the applicant (c) The identification of other permits not included in apply for a new permit. _ the application to the extent known by the local government; (5) The revision approval, including the revised site (d) The identification of existing environmental docu- plans and text consistent with the provisions of WAC 173- ments that evaluate the proposed project, and if not other-. 27-180 as necessary to clearly indicate the authorized wise stated on the document providing the notice of applica- changes, and the final ruling on consistency with this section tion, such as a city land use bulletin,the location where the shall be filed with the.department. In addition, local application and any studies can be reviewed; government shall notify parties of record of their action. (e) A statement of the public comment period, which (6) If the revision to the original permit involves a shall be not less than thirty days following the date of notice conditional use or variance, local government shall submit of application, and statements of the right of any person to the revision to the department for the department's approval, .comment on the application,receive notice of and participate approval with conditions, or denial, and shall indicate that in any hearings, request a copy of the decision once made, the revision is being submitted under the requirements of this and any appeal rights. A local government may accept subsection. The department shall render and transmit to public comments at any time prior to the closing of the local government and the applicant its final decision within record of an open record predecision hearing, if any, or, if fifteen days of the date of the department's receipt of the no open record predecision hearing is provided, prior to the submittal from local government. Local government shall decision on the project permit; notify parties of record of the department's final decision. (f)The date, time,place, and type of hearing, if applica- (7) The revised permit is effective immediately upon ble and scheduled at the date of notice of the application; final decision by local government or, when appropriate (g)A statement of the preliminary determination, if one under subsection (6) of this section,upon final action by the has been made at the time of notice, of those development department regulations that will be used for project mitigation and of (8)Appeals shall be in accordance with RCW 90.58.180 consistency; and and shall be filed within twenty-one days from the date of (h)Any other information determined appropriate by the receipt of the local government's action by the department local government or, when appropriate under subsection (6) of this section, the (3)If an open record predecision hearing, as defined in date the department's final decision is transmitted to local RCW 36.70B.020, is required for the requested project government and the applicant. Appeals shall be based only permits, the notice of application shall be provided at least upon contentions of noncompliance with the provisions of fifteen days prior to the open record hearing. subsection (2) of this section. Construction undertaken (4) The notification system shall assure that notice to pursuant to that portion of a revised permit not authorized the general public and property owners in the vicinity of under the original permit is at the applicant's own risk until such application is given by at least one of the following the expiration of the appeals deadline. If an appeal is methods: successful in proving that a revision is not within the scope (a) Mailing of the notice to the latest recorded real and intent of the original permit, the decision shall have no property owners as shown by the records of the county bearing on the original permit assessor within at least three hundred feet of the boundary of the property upon which the development is proposed; [Statutory Authority: RCW fle 9/30/96,6ne effectivet10/31/9 96-20-075 (b) Posting of the notice in a conspicuous manner on the (Order 95-17), § 173-27-100,filed 10/31/96.1 property upon which the project is to be undertaken; or WAC 173-27-110 Notice required. (1) Local (c) Any other manner deemed appropriate by local government shall develop and adopt a system which provides authorities to accomplish the objectives of reasonable notice for notification of the public, the department and other to adjacent landowners and the public. (5) The notification system shall provide for timely agencies with jurisdiction of applications for a shoreline management substantial development, conditional use, notification of individuals and organizations that request such or w variance permit Notification pursuant to this section maynotice in writing. be (6) Thewnotification system shall provide notice to all c parried out as a part of an integrated local permit notification agencies with jurisdiction per chapter 43.21C RCW and to (22)) The system shall assure that notice of application Pry all other agencies that request in writing any such notice. shall be provided within fourteen days after the determine- (Statutory Authority: RCW 90.58.140(3)and [90.581.200. 96-20-075 tion of completeness as provided in RCW 36.70B.070 and (Order 95-17),§ 173-27-110.filed 9/30/96.effective 10/31/96.] WAC 173-27-180, and include the following in whatever sequence or format the local government deems appropriate: WAC 173-27-120 Special procedures for limited utility extensions and bulkheads- (1)An application for a substantial development permit for a limited utility extension (9/30/9‘5)[Ch.173-27 WAC—p.8] / #14k) JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER 21 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368- '118rrrel FAX TRANSMITTAL DATE: / / i S � '��� TO: -i ' Pyx -'! '`./fit, gt 7e-t— PHONE: ( `(Z5 ) -.7((3 /S-0 O FAX: ( `(ZS ) ?T-) - cf /00 NUMBER OF PAGES 4+ coif FROM: LJ /.y , , JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER PHONE: (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 SUBJECT: LZ' e-2/4 51)P / Ev iS/O,t1 COMMENTS: W uc4�47TS /LI frr/77 7/)-1..c/ )-= yf t2' cam` ' ne p7 ii,9 S ; / /�' `c ( l / /1 1J/ Cti 1,',t:, g?'C//'s �O«' S X lJ Building Environmental Health Development Review Public Works Building Permits Septic Permits Subdivision, Zoning Road Approach 379-4450 Water Review &Shoreline Permits - Permits&Addresses Inspection Hotline 379-4463 379-4450 379-4455 .OG 11'019445° 1-800-831-2678 # 5 FAX: (206) 379-4451 4 9y LitiAr CANOE COVE DEVELOPMENT (LP08-92, IZ46-92 & SDP92-0015) FINDINGS RELATIVE TO PRELIMINARY APPROVALS GRANTED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A mixed use development consisting of attached and detached single family residential, condominium multi-family residential units, renovation of the west wing of the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Restaurant building (west wing of the old alcohol plant) to create residential artist studio condominiums, a restaurant, and a health club (recreational center with a swimming pool), construction of access roads, utilities, parking facilities consisting of 124 spaces, and designation of open space. Includes demolition of the east wing of the alcohol plant which had previously been converted to a hotel. A conditional shoreline substantial development permit was issued on October 18, 1993 for the above described project. Shoreline permits expire two years after permit approval, unless construction, or substantial progress, or a one year extension has been granted by the County. A revised single residential phase consisting of 25 lots was granted final approval on November 26, 1996. Minimum building setback variances for several proposed multi-family structures were granted to permit front lot line setback of 15 feet, rear lot line setback of 10 feet, and for zero lot line structures, a 5 feet on one side of attached structures. The following table shows details of the approved project. Use # Lots # Units Area Attached 44 44 Residential Detached 5 5 Residential Condominium - 1 21 lot 5, approx. Multi-family 14-2 Bdrm. Flats 47,608 sq. ft. & 7-3 Bdrm. Townhouses Artist Studio 1 8-1Bdrm. In lot 6„ approx. Condominium existing building 80,788 sq. ft. Condominium- 1 63(3 bldg., 21 lot 49, approx. Multi-family units each), 42-1 83,945 sq. ft. Bdrm Flats & 21 2-Bdrm. Flats Total Residential 52 141 Lots/Units A ®RAL. Open Space 4 (tracts A, B ,E & N/A 3.47 acres F) Commercial (pier) 1 (tract C) N/A 0.12 acres Commercial 1 (tract D) N/A unknown (tidelands) Total Area 25.3 acres DRAFT FINDINGS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED REVISIONS TO CANOE COVE APPROVAL (Formerly Canoe Cove, Revised Proposal Name Lands End) REVISION PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A mixed use development consisting of detached single-family residential, condominium multi-family residential units, marina services (storage lockers, locker rooms, change and shower facilities, laundry facilities, restroom, care room, & small convenience store), primary restaurant and lounge, health spa/recreation area, swimming pool, facility services, general reception, banquet facilities, secondary lounge, reception center, construction of a three-level parking garage consisting of 516 parking spaces, access road improvements, and designation of open space. The following table shows details of the proposed revisions to the preliminary approved project. Use # Lots # Units Area Detached 25 (Villas By The 24 7.3 acres Residential Sea Plat) Hospitality Suites ? 6 Lot ?, approx. 1 Bdrm. sq. ft. Studio Suites ? 15 lot ?, approx. Condominium - sq. ft. 42 (3 bldgs, # 1= lot ?, approx. Bay view 12 units, # 2=15 sq. ft. units, #3 =15 units), 2-1 Bdrm Flats & 40 2- Bdrm. Flats Mansion Suites ? 48 total, 24 1 lot ?, approx. sq. bdrm units & 24 2 ft. bdrm units Loft Suites ? 8 - 2 bdrm units lot ?, approx. sq.ft. Total Residential ? 143 DRAII Lots/Units Open Space ? N/A acres Commercial (pier) ? N/A ? acres Commercial ? N/A unknown (tidelands) Total Area 25.3 acres SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMITTING SDP-92-15 Permit Approval: The Jefferson County Board of Commissioners granted approval of a conditional shoreline substantial development permit October 18, 1993. The conditional shoreline development permit was approved by the Department of Ecology December 15, 1993. Page 3 of the permit, under NOTICE: # 3 states: Construction pursuant to this permit will not begin nor is it authorized until thirty (30) days from the date of filing as defined in RCW 90.58. 140(6) and WAC 173- 14-090, or until all review proceedings initiated within thirty days from the date of such filing have terminated, except as provided in RCW 90.58.140(5.a-c). Construction or substantial progress toward construction of the permitted development shall begin within two (2) years from the date of this permit and completion of the permitted activity shall be accomplished within five (5) years from the date of this permit. Substantial Progress: For the first phase ( Villas By The Sea) construction or substantial progress toward construction began by the submittal of construction plans for roads, storm water management and erosion control. The applicant entered into a contract for preparation of improvement construction drawings on . Construction plans were submitted to the Department of Public Works during October 1995 and approved on November30, 1995. Road construction and storm water management facility construction inspection took place during October, 1996. Time Requirements of Permit: Technically, a shoreline development permit is valid for a period of five (5) years. The subject shoreline development permit was validated by DOE on December 15, 1993, and therefore, would expire on December 15, 1998. Said permit, per above, requires completion of the permitted activity within five (5) years from the date of the permit. Related to permit extensions, WAC 173-27-090 (2) (b) states "authorization to conduct development activities shall terminate five years after the effective date of a shoreline permit." DRAFT Permit Extension: Jefferson County can approve a single extension for a period not to exceed one year based on reasonable factors, if a request for an extension has been filed before the expiration date and notice of a proposed extension is given to parties of record and DOE. To date, no requests for extensions have been filed with Jefferson County. Is the Proposed Revision Consistent With Applicable Urban Environment Policies and Performance Standards ? Examples include: • Building Height • Access to and enhance enjoyment of the shoreline for a substantial number of people • Pedestrian and visual access to and along the waterfront area • Provide public views to the water • Preserve and enhance significant architecture and historical buildings • Preserve and protect unique natural features of the urban shoreline • Parking facilities located on upland side of buildings away from shorelines • Is the use classified as a water-dependent, water related or water enjoyment use • Public Access provisions dedicated/recorded Do The Proposed Revisions Constitute Substantial Development ? Guiding regulation employed is Chapter 173-27 WAC, Shoreline Management Permit and Enforcement Procedures. WAC 173-27-100 Revisions to Permits " A permit revision is required whenever the applicant proposes substantive changes to the design, terms or conditions of a project from that which is approved in the permit. Changes are substantive if they materially alter the project in a manner that relates to its conformance to the terms and conditions of the permit, the master program and/or the policies and provisions of chapter 90.58 RCW." For Consideration: 1. Canoe Cove, the area identified as tract B (1.02 acres) was reviewed and approved as open space (ingress, egress, utilities, parking, public access, landscaping, recreation, and storm drainage). 2. Lands End, three condominium buildings and open space are proposed on tract B. The Bay View condominiums contain 42 residential units. 3. The original permit review did not include review for compliance with applicable shoreline program policies and performance standards of three condominium buildings on this part of the project site. 4. Does this then constitute substantial development according to the County Shoreline Master Program and the provisions of WAC Shoreline Management Permit and Enforcement Procedures. 5. Would these changes then require a new permit as suggested by the above shoreline regulations. Dated this 22nd day of August, 1997 Jerry Smith, Associate Planner, Development Review Division N % � JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER 4.• � 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 FAX TRANSMITTAL DATE: 3/(4198 TO: 4 L;-.r+V at-bi-teee PHONE: ( 4ZS) `7Y3 -/So0 FAX: ( 42 ) 33-7- qIE30 NUMBER OF PAGES a /4-'&( '. , /'Cr COC."eve FROM: JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER PHONE: (360) 379-4450 FAX: (360) 379-4451 • SUBJECT: dL G' COMMENTS: *1t74 -&4 b IS PW-1,-T f ' : isf0A/, C. ,b/SCvss'et , rhu /F YO &(1C.- -;7-7 Ai wilding Environmental Health Development Review Public Works Building Permits Septic Permits Subdivision, Zoning Road Approach 379-4450 Water Review &Shoreline Permits - Permits&Addresses Inspection Hotline _OG ITR\/379-4450 379-4463 379-4450 379-4455 5 1-800-831-2678 FAX: (206) 379-4451 BEFORE THE ADMINISTRATOR/HEARING EXAMINER/BOCC OF JEFFERSON COUNTY In Re: (Insert the Name of the Applicant, ) No. (Place Case #Here) Application or Appeal Here) ) ) Type: (Decision/Order/or } Recom-mendation). I. Summary of the Proceedings A summary of the proceedings should, at a minimum, outline the procedural history of the case (including specific dates of hearings and notices), a list of all the exhibits received and all persons who testified at the hearing, and any legal briefs filed by the parties. A"summary" of testimony should not be given unless relied upon in a Finding of Fact. II. Findings of Fact The Supreme Court decided in Weyerhaeuser v. Pierce County that: "Findings of fact by an administrative agency are subject to the same requirement as are findings of fact drawn by a trial court. The purpose of findings of fact is to ensure that the decision-maker has dealt fully and properly with all issues in the case before he or she decides it and so the parties involved and the appellate court may be fully informed as to the bases of his or her decision." Findings of fact should be statements of verifiable fact relevant to the criteria for review of the application. The findings must be based exclusively on evidence presented in the hearing that establishes the existence or nonexistence of factual matters. A finding must be made on each contested issue of fact and must reference a specific exhibit or testimony that supports the finding. III. Criteria for Review The criteria for review should set forth the particular portions of federal and state laws, local plans and ordinances, and judicial decisions that the decision-maker must use to determine the approval or disapproval of the application at hand. The burden of proof is upon the applicant to demonstrate compliance with applicable review criteria. IV. Conclusions The decision-making process, analysis and conclusions reached by the decision-maker is revealed in the Conclusions. Each Conclusion must be supported by a reference to the relevant Findings of Fact and should reveal how those findings relate to the legal criteria set forth under Criteria for Review. In other words, "when Law A is applied to Fact B, Conclusion C must be reached." V. Decision or Recommendation Recommendations of the Citzen Task Force on Land Use Procedural Reform FORMAT FOR LAND USE DECISIONS 2/24/98 Page 1 • A decision or recommendation should be based on the Facts, Criteria and Conclusions as laid out previously in the document. The decision or recommendation may be to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application. If conditions are imposed, the decision or recommendation should set forth those conditions with great specificity and indicate how the conditions mitigate specific impacts. Every decision must be signed and dated by the decision-maker. Recommendations of the Citzen Task Force on Land Use Procedural Reform FORMAT FOR LAND USE DECISIONS 2/24/98 Page 2 JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER 621 SHERIDAN ST., PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 MAR _ 6 1998 (360) 379-4450 1-800-831-2678 REVISED SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION NO. SDP92 - 0015 Also file numbers LP-08-92 , IZ-46-93 The Washington State Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58) requires that revisions to permitted substantial developments within designated shorelines of the State comply with its administrative procedures (WAC 173-14- 064) and the provisions of the Jefferson County-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program. Please answer the following questions completely. Print in ink or type. APPLICANT: A.K. Sharma , Manager Port Hadlock KSC LLC ADDRESS: 1207 Brentwood Ave . Richland, WA 99352 TELEPHONE: (home) -- (business) -- REPRESENTATIVE/CONTACT PERSON: Tillman Engineering, Inc . / ARCA P. O. Box 1375 / 11215 - 19th Ave . SE ADDRESS: Port Hadlock WA 98339 Everett , WA 98208 ( 360 ) 379-9661 (425 ) 743-1500 TELEPHONE: (Wilk) ( 360 ) 379-0150 fax (W ) (425 ) 337-4180 fax DIRECTIONS 1 . Answer all questions completely. Contact the Jefferson County Development Review Division for aid in filling out this application and for instructions on further administrative procedures required to complete processing. 2. Attach any additional information (reports, studies, maps, illustrations, leases, permits, etc.) that may further describe the proposed revision or be required by Jefferson County, in addition to the revised development plan. 3. Check with appropriate departments to determine if the proposed revision requires additional permits or approvals. A revision permit issued under the Jefferson County-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program will not excuse a permittee from compliance with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statues applicable to the proposed revision. REVISED DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION PROPERTY (identify changes in the description of the property as described in the original application, including the legal, ownership, and natural and cultural features): Request for Shorelines Minor Amendment submitted to Jefferson County Permit Center on May 8 , 1997 . Please see May 8 , 1997 packet for complete description of requested revisions to site plan. LOG ITEM REVISED DEVELOPMENT (identify and describe the proposed revision, including the type of materials to be used, construction methods, principal dimensions, and other pertinent information): Request for minor amendment submitted May 8 , 1997 . See May 8 , 1997 submittal packet for complete description of requested revisions to site . USE (commercial, residential, recreational, etc.): A mixed use residential/commercial/recreational development on the site of the existing Old Alcohol Plant Lodge and Marina . ESTIMATED COST/FAIR MARKET VALUE: greater than COMPLETION DATE: -- $2 , 500 Fair Market Value REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN Using the original development plan, illustrate and identify the proposed revision to the permitted development. ACKNOWLEDGMENT I hereby declare, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the foregoing information and all attached information is true and correc . 4. -14/a4A- 3/67? 8' (authorized signature) (date) Application Fee S.1-00.00. ................ ......... . . ... .... .. Only'. For Office Use Receipt No Cas +heck No • Z .,._ Fee . Date: 3 _ '( Initials: h:\home\pincntr\infoping\shorrev.doc TILLMAN141 PROFESSIONAL CENTER 141 OAK BAY ROAD/P.O.BOX 1375 PORT HADLOCK,WASHINGTON 98339 ENGINEERING, INC. 360-379-9661 360-379-0150 FAX RECEIVED - 1998 J.C. PERMIT CENTER March 6, 1998 Jerry Smith, Assistant Planner Jefferson County Permit Center 621 Sheridan St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 RE: APPLICATION FORM-FILE#SDP92-0015 Dear Mr. Smith, Based on a conversation of March 4, 1998,Jefferson County has now requested an application form and $110 administrative fee be submitted in conjunction with the request for Minor Amendment of File# SDP92-0015, "Canoe Cove." The request for Minor Amendment("Land's End")was received by Jefferson County May 8, 1997. Enclosed find the completed application form and administrative fee. The applicant continues to consider the receipt date of May 8, 1997 as the date of complete application for this request. Sincerely, Debbie Randall it LOG ad /;z /44-4 511 16€7 / t'e 4h-c- 77 ;3 77-gbe /fe4,(7 4,61/ -671 _a#044.. AtOt'l r- -/-n--a-2 G i), cL..„ 4-4z) fr" 2,-14 s itINTEM \Cnq .-Q‘-s'52 action taken on any proposal for adoption or amendment of the master program,and any appeal of the department's action. The department's approved document of record constitutes the official master program. Sec. 51. RCW 90.58.143 and 1996 c 62 s 1 are each amended to read UM as follows: (I)The time requirements of this section shall apply to all substantial development permits and to any development authorized pursuant to a variance or conditional use permit authorized under this chapter. Upon a finding of good cause,based on the requirements and circumstances of the project proposed and consistent with the policy and provisions of the master program and this chapter,local government may adopt different time limits {+from those set forth in subsections (2)and(3)of this section+} as a part of action on a substantial development permit. (2)Construction activities shall be commenced or,where no construction activities are involved,the use or activity shall be commenced within two years of the effective date of a substantial development permit. However,local government may authorize a single extension for a period not to exceed one year based on reasonable factors,if a request for extension has been filed before the expiration date and notice of the proposed extension is given to parties of record on the substantial development permit and to the department. (3)Authorization to conduct construction activities shall terminate five years after the effective date of a substantial development permit. However,local government may authorize a single extension for a period not to exceed one year based on reasonable factors,if a request for extension has been filed before the expiration date and notice of the proposed extension is given to parties of record and to the department. (4)The effective date of a substantial development permit shall be the date of(({-the last action required on the substantial development permit and all-})) {+filing as provided in RCW 90.58.140(6). The permit time periods in subsections(2)and(3)of this section do not include the time during which a use or activity was not actually pursued due to the pendency of administrative appeals or legal actions or due to the need to obtain any+}other government permits and approvals for the development that authorize the development to proceed,including all{+reasonably related+} administrative(({-and-})) {+or+} legal actions on any{+such+} permits or approvals. q LP *Sec.52. RCW 34.05.518 and 1995 c 382 s 5 are each amended to Cr ( in Y' a)311fi read as follos(s: (1)The fin'41 decision of an administrative agency in an C? adjudicative preceeding under this chapter may be directly reviewed by LP S j r4 the court of appe s either(a)upon certification by the superior .A Q el court pursuant to this section or(b)if the final decision is from an N` environmental board as defined in subsection(3)of this section,upon acceptance by the court of appeals after a certificate of appealability has been filed by the 4ivtronmental board that rendered the final decision. \, (2)For direct review upon certification by the superior court,an application for direct review must be filed with the superior court within thirty days of the fili'tag of the petition for review in superior court. The superior court may certify a case for direct review only if the judicial review is limited tb the record of the agency proceeding and the court finds that: (a)Fundamental and urgent issues affecting the future LOG ITEM STAT (r) Ov ',7889 a STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY P.O. Box 47775 • Olympia, Washington 98504-7775 • (360) 407-6300 October 31, 1997 Mr. Jerry Smith D 1h) N y ll F ��, Jefferson County Planning :91 l ! 621 Sheridan Street a , Port Townsend, WA 98362 1 +957 Dear Mr. Smith: JEFFERSON PERMIT CENITER ry ! I am finally responding to your question regarding the Old Alcohol plant/Canoe Cove/Land's End proposal. Significant changes are proposed,relative to the previous permit,making it a challenge to determine whether the new proposal is consistent with the"scope and intent"of the earlier permitted design. With regards this project,per WAC 173-27-100(1)we conclude the key language therein as: "If local government determines that the proposed changes are within the scope and intent of the original permit, and are consistent with the applicable master program and the act, local government may approve a revision." As we discussed on the site a few weeks ago, and based upon the largely conceptual nature of the plans presented to date,Ecology would like to be involved in a collaborative negotiation leading to an agreed upon set of conditions to ensure Shoreline Management Act consistency. We would like to see plan modifications for a larger buffer area between the individual homes and the waterfront, and to plan for enhancement of native species riparian habitat values in those areas. Strengthening public access amenities for enjoyment of the shoreline there is another area for continuing discussion. I look forward to working with you and the applicants to promote the advances already made in planning a development of long term, sustainable design on the shores of Port Townsend Bay. Please call me if you have any questions; my number is(360)407-6521. Kim Van Zwalenburg can be reached at(360)407-6520 in my absence. Sincerely, 0,0714/1(-4....) 4111 Jeffree av-vart Shoreline Specialist Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program JS:cl LOG ITEM #_____Ik____—. -44a. C) 10-31-199? 01:34PM JeffersonCo Assessor/IDMS 360 385 9197 P.02 orT •( ' 1997 STATE Of WASHINGTON "' # DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY JEFFERSON Cs PERMIT i F`,- ea Sox 4777S • Olympia, Washington 90504-7775 • (360)4007.634I- October3l,199? sop 7-a- °cli c> Mr.Jerry Smith Jefterson County Planning 621 Sheridan Std Peet Townsend,WA 90362 Dear Mr.Smith: I am runny responding to your question regarding the Old Alcohol plaid/Canoe Covet Land's End proposal. Significant changes are proposed,relative to the previous permit,making it a challenge to determine whether the new proposal is consistent with the"scope and Intent"etre earlier permitted design. With regards this project,per WAC 173-27-100(I)we conclude the key language therein as: "If local government detemtines that the proposed changes are within the scope and intent of the original permit.and arc consistent with the applicable master program and the act,local government may approve a revision? As we discussed on the site a few weeks ago,and based upon the largely ooneeptual nature oft/re plans presented to date,Ecology would like to be involved in a collaborative negotiation leading to an agreed upon set ofoonditivns to ensure Shoreline Management Act consistency. We would like to see plan modifications for a larger buffer area between the individual homes and the cataract,and to plan for enhancement of native species riparian habitat values in those areas. Strengthening public access amenities for enjoyment of the shoreline theme is another area for cotltimting discussion. I look fcxwerd to working with you and the applicants to promote the advances already made in planning a development of long term,sustainable design on the shores of Port Townsend Bay. Please call me if you have any questionx my number is(360)407.6521. Kim Van Zwsttnburg can be reached at(360)407-6520 in my absence. Sincerely, heron gbatart Shoesl10e Specialist Shot+etauds and Environmental Assimaaoc Program 3S:cl 40 LOG ITEM TOTAL P.02 gr 10-31-199? e1:34PM JeffersonCo Assessor/IDMS 360 385 919? P.01 FAX NUMBER A'(c,t) :3 g- .q0 7 vrasis Dew FAX COVER SHEET 10131 T #of Pages: -2_ • TO: J-6%1 ‘"1 het 1.441 FROM: 0,, 114,--r1 REMARKS: -w ---1 Washington Dept.of Ecology Southwest Rogional Office P.O. Box 47775 Olympia,WA 98504-7775 Pim*: (360)407-630t1 / 9 7 0•Lt.--turta-c., et-e. , ..„--et.„ ;.„ /2'9'7 Aku2:4;ge_4-17 Glut— 4.4144._ 4 :Slid 2 /I 20 0 746/4r, 2 v,xt•-,, , as /So-e_A-0-tA4 I 0 oe ) • LOG ITEM v __ 1_17 4,e:: e 4u:i.),7 r e s.. c,5 re.,L,t . , ‘_, ____, '---,-- . /f p 11 `S 1 U0 4,t/i" C6,'9/ io,rem as ..- "6--=„e_,", /7-- ,J--E-Fr n -- <7- JFF .S7-R -f- c rki/ r c ',t e-e S' / _z2et-,1J, ✓ iv 7-- , ,,°C— ,t t-1 L i23 _ -7_ (voC6e_) /J _- ?. ,.40,A ,,,,,, 6 0 40_,_,___z__ .,_ 7i.„4.....,„fi f _ cI�-c/) ry ?,-/1-9 7 „ xe -Sw6z - /) . G/4 G J 7-.-r--igjA____ '-e-/e 7( ,-( -=,_ '-- - ,---,,,_,,_,__74 K 3 a> Zq ' .., ?-2-,../ ,------.--/ /2--1--e----- 1-7A2—t------, t// r ii --- ' _ p-t...(1-- <'29P , 6 .. ......-..t 4/.9-2.,.9'z-, ..,.', —6/...._,/1 ,„_,,,.,.. ,......,...,, <4..„___.e„,,,.....A__, ,.._..„k c_.---e.k_ _ -r09/1"! " f 4ir06-41 Ale AO'6-40E4 fiPue./ d 4Aos Pe-a, 414 ( eAff' 4/ DI-120--r1 Paag—le-gesi,s. C414-44, • e e 71-1 tA/ alhg-S /1--L2friorro-d., 111 l;i 11 1 I' fi • 1.-I/D ?vT_ _T Gam " , Pprecz—c, 001 CUQ'C pL _ #' 'c/ S Off (gyp& pRv as et> s`T''U�7��� `CO A.1D d S ) - --__ r)vt,,J tAt- 1 s Vor /,?, /9?co oG746 -- (7,/99c, P Per ;f , - I, h o orb ti ,�€,��o ) &St 9 - Lo 2-5-3 6eAlevue. lrE1-14 7^q 1 . 111N-. -. � '4 f4/ s�eL /C /-e, 4lJ iV 121. 671--0-, , /'�4t ,,Z • ��� r 71 zchi, -n' S n "...-1 • /tom/ 9 'r'71..E o -G f`d0~ ° S' /f don-r�.if-oi4 / 7 -G . .Gfdeyg_n x/ ,rte ,i)�yri__a_s__Lh ' 4 J>1..s_.0 ,64._,J 3 c., -e-X 15./- 41 446'1'04-X) .e-X f as la. t[it6,/,,eye 1/1040040, /-ai/.e-/? { < ,41,4,./g sem/ /1-7--eet, �s177 rk--t c-ed C,_ SZ i ' /0 1 / ° •h-e- d.,(-dPf-f-f l/a-n71 g V e f bdri. scw f /es' Cg ) bre . I! V e 2_ 6a/1-4i, cSur` e-1' Cep ► ' 6 fwd; o Z 4/fe.r ( s) ; V 2 6 ft'l-m ss'e-,-,`71-es (u�) Vi i wl s 4 s Cs- ) % IQY.e- - - I Sti tK� 2 6drw1, -cWf.O-s Cg) 11f ✓ . Z arm / fi--/- 5c.i; Y- ..fc ) -ee/ c?�, -- --- __------- 11 PO Sa1-_9_. - I ; ; I • °0-e'4-0a- 3-r 2 01c h 57G,01 s vf,„0,5, )00,1_51v itg_s (5/7 ‘ 14/7.,z r (-/7./) btu"? • 149/p (7 - pA ? / r°9/ • 0/:2 sive 044/,- () spy,- ,Uy II04/6/51 "S) 1 7 0/ MN I 02 01a) AV�n I', 4O , ic'/-7/A Pd f ((Yo/Y44'J7 .i7 "' 4/ /L � .fir 0 50'4{/ 7 ,, . . , • . , . , - . . ,• . .,, . .,.. -, ,..• • 1'1, '`,:.;-'''',,,,4-,1-••,•,, ',- • ';,•-;•••',••!••'-', ;,. - , .., .. la 4 fp lig !Tr — n m r 1 ail! III!iv. pp Ito ild, tip it rips,v I 1 1 pp.; il i a i PI 4 Ili I .1 g of- Ilji f(wilailifPli o =I 0 it 1;. i a t q 1 , i ii , m z II lit I ril . Ii 11 It 131 111111AV,A0of , : n 0 0 > i 10 11 I; if I" if ill < no 19 al a. 1 1 1 fil 11 ' r— I Pi, ill 11 ti 0 I I It) 2:1 1 I V 1 -! -I , 4 ,_ .._Li r--. --0 JIIIr • .\\-. Ria i I • 4 • ir...0-- , '1 , I 1 I--i=1 i -z - , . , . 1! SI. 111 . ' 1:141 i a ...„ 4IU ! c z:3 1 ..4/__ tr '' ...1111; 4 : • _ „17-•jogaitrit.:46--", 'N I \ lint ".. troatn.1.1 1 Re di 14 , - a...72•:,.k.„, \ IS'44 , • , '' 7 ''`'•'&,. ;I \ )1 l; . • , '' I . 1!1:. '• 71 .. TA li a , .., .14 , .‘. , \il if• 5,EVP t; 8 A 4 ... ., ..., ••'. •• . , r ., 4 , a •,- 411 I . _..... • _. Are - -It' . ; L, ,.. , f ....-- ...• • al: , 1 - -...' '' '' :,,, NIL : i 4, .. ' ''' ' ' rig!L:V i ':k•.1'''9 , 5. 414 0611 IIIPaillall 4fr.,. . . . " 4..... . ,_..,.. 4 11 i mas .., **arum -,-•%-,I,. :„.filip‘,, fr#,.t. . + , . . . -,'''N • ,.. .,,, ,,- . •,.,. ii I4 11 • • . '', •• -IP'%,4. I ''101T11 III ' 11211111 . . 1$1 - •' 4W'C2417# '' M§ ____J /Ay„ a.....,., . . ,0•00/S.A.v," , .1„.„dikv FA, :,‘. '`t•,, 1 - 7'KEPI A IrC;t37''114,..104711C4"7> • ')*'‘' 111111r'IL \', I a ilEd;,,—'1 s / 4:'-'1.,_•tioti4ZATIA44# ' 'it. 00'1% ' s' q , IL .--i 1,...,,,miral, 1,40AW/or 4--atip..,,&A • .1. _of„Lo , ,v,:'i.1 114 1 -- ;cake ...,=.1......,...,L7-43:=Lmm.„4. —.."-, ‘ . ...N. . \ '•k . ••••••**•,,,, • , • n sor I . . • - 411111P11 N... • ' • •:-"• •44:. "I >s. '' 'A; ) , its 1 r Ir. v-*•-,. . 4. .,, , . • ..,,,, ,,,, ....„ . _ N cos "ie .io."4 . , 44., ,,,...... tt • ".:•._•,`%• , 'A Atk. -7>V41 4a a ir :sss , . i aTeli . I .=.004-Fs'"-‘ ,-v .4 tp-uds. • "*„--4", k, . • _ ,\ . i ' w INNIAl- • ., '-k>, eijilrATidik(011\ftt- , NI- ty- - - \ . . MN • •' - 1114 g: .• •"^"Tv*Pitlirilip\ IA II 4 . t, • ,. 1 ,„,,,..., ,A .. • ..... 4 ....99-' • al .2. • ....."..cipi.s•••Ait' copt".7474,74 .440rail4" ‘%% .410,10' __..4),,,•.:4cti..! '40_,,orgr,p,._.41,toe.% %:_i.a. ' All I: . (t........,!'',.,1,,,,.:Ir. ..—.— —•°- 16.• .v.*":11 .—.."1"11111- II. 11- . 11_ • il" r a 1.41P2Mt • • A. `1, a . 1. • --. .. „ . -..,,, ,-•. , - . , • . •. . . ____ . . • ', • 1 ------ - - .-... ,/. -0 - ,n13 ... , m c cr) '‘. v), n 0\ ,,..,„,,,ts,,,,,,•N'v ,t,','.4.4,i, Z17 s''„ 73 (;) ; *tkA,.. •';`(t•-,,,•,, ., ,,,, • ,,,.1,'\, , , . Z _,n1 ,--,C,,,--;*.,-.1.,-.,.•-;-,..„,--;":*:-.,..„'=„4,-=6,,,,:',-;- -!.,,,A , , r-j V ,- c . \,, 3),3:"N;:A.:,, .,t,..2`!"-AtN't':,•s, -.,,'..,,"I:::-.;.K,.f''',.4...,.., ,,,„4,;,,, . . . . , . .. . .. .-\ --, .,„..,•&„;,":,,,,,,,,,-',.;-. , -,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, , ,,,,„,,.,,,.,4.,.t...„,,,,t,,,,,,„t..,,, bc - z_l' isv_.:,,,,-.4,.'.4, ''' '''t,;',.,'17%';,.) ,.•,;,,,4,1'.1,-4,:' ':-.:t ,,,-, --...A - . -lit"' T. • , :, - -',;,.,:,',t4..,,,..;,, • 11 ,7; II) i i 111_,..: " .•*.,:‘.',,!'*::1C.,,..''''4*..•i:;',,:, .ii''' ,, • _ -,., •\ 7 „. * i _ ---- '-\;•---- '\-.:_ . ' i \I .. *•:',.',N,., I t:, :i 1 ...... — . , , ,,........, . ,,-- __. , __„----__ ---- VD ---, r-- -, '--- - _ _ -., -1 •..,„cL r..,_ . ... - b-,."'2;,,,,tv, 18 _. .,_ _ . ..• ,... ‘ . .. :.„,,,A...,. , __--........._.- -,.. ,.--‘ '-' ' li iri•,...i'''il.,' '\\-1,,', _., \\::----'. . • .' 1.11-frrl 1 1 H 1 1 1 t '', , :,,,Vt,,,,,N,,,\,,,;,. __ :7 _ ....:- ' o 1•„. 1 ,..,,,, , .--4. -,..,'„',4 o . • I,. N u.:6,-- - „,1 i 6116)(-I - 7;) ' ibi ,4 411,64111116„. --.-_, -- , . • -;„--.--. ,, ,, -----611 .. _ - - ----- ) •...„-1,- ,.. --,:.-,.- ,\ \ .- ---- , :,,,,,-t,,,,,';--•,-:=, ''',.:.. •,.--‘,.. -.\----, '''.- '''-, '- Ifs' •- - 4N or -,-k-- ----,,,,r-1: i,..s.:...,,, ,:-. ,;.',..;,' ,•Now -- \ -----.ii Ai. m m • • 1 `z :",\H [ _ ,''''''''-'1 ' I ''•fr—Aido, , 1 v 'Z%.'v,,'-'4:::,....,"'Nill-4,$' `, ---1/,'- -.,, - . '....'Eti..1 1 - ,i„g,„. ,.„4 1 .. ; 4, , \ ,, At-i I '''---':::--.-..'- '..-12., '.'4.,:',°V...N:: -.-----:: ' ' Plfkl,'"•-•. i %.-.1.A.‘ . • \‘'' \ 1 .1, ---1-- I 1 ' ',, 1-#rje= --. ''''I 0,\ 4`,,,,-5,1,‘7•41- '. \--s--"'''.4-4111P.......•--A-\ \ ...._••41.0",‘ ' .<:‘,.'.k : 1• 1 i - --i---- i-- -- -711-;5 ":5')''' 41161k\?;':#11 0011/'40 ...\\‘'\''k. 1 . I...- .,., , , 1 . • i : ..:,-..,,,,,,..., '''•,. ,-.--•'wo).",ak, \ .. „,...:,•/ ,, II\ , .,\,. , 1 I En, , , 1 ....,!‘••,* cr,r,i/1/00, S , 1 ,....iii,,A.ak, \ ..,.,, # , s,:,,,.\\.‘....., I 1 04,-, , --', ,,,,;,..,,-.- ..... ' ,* \IPAillia, ii .W.....- -,'-.1-1111'",_), t \ - ' \•\.' \ i N.. ,,,,,,.,‘4",,Ai.,-,:N,,,t'',,...,.','''''.,,,•,',..;',.. '01:NAN,,i,..,......,-*.,-,r4.4,-,_ , ) ----- -- . ,-- -- • • . A _ 1_ __ --, '..7M1,4P,:i It 4.2P,k'''' ' '''''b,{. '' ,i,' ',1...'-:'•.1...'- ' ' It'. r141114WIS*') . .1.4P ..... "'s. •-"......, d 1 ? ,,,;,,,.,„•,., , -,,.1.`..:...,,‘-...4:,..-,,,,',. 7S,,,, ... !'7,0:14.1.;!.....4,i _---/ ‘ ligrAttint 1 \biro'tr.r"."' L" '•%,.' '''' ' '''l ''. '' . '•'.4. l'A,,.'11'.:.‘ '0,--+4)1 1-- ‘ I A.'...-,-__-7-;, 1 lir...,'''' .„___.- AVE. --=.1'':',..,-,v..4'.7;4-..-*•..;‘..,'...,",.'s.h....,:l...",..k.,4 ,.A.,.,,,,,..-•,,.,.....,.*... . . — 1,._...j _ 1_,..,..-.....,------- - r- -- -1 ,ii' __ _- --.---- ------""' -----7-------'''---"- , it 1 ;,4'.. I =.• -• . • . - ' ; 1 • ...„ =i c! rGYlSIo/r/ W V) 0 v) O 0 < C9 Z _z < 0 J D m v, L c °'a a) T 7) co w ro d cos LA bb LO � cLo OM O E "D j pa UO C L N L �^ C J C -p C �•_ O O co -c N 1 �, in -p 0 re •n 0 _ v� o Oo v O O �O 111 — C X QJ LA O — M © O M O O d 3 M — -6 a) 0 ,-- CJ C •L O co 00 p y c= CM CIO -o To o � Or. cu O ro c O c if--;oN c J O.0 in -O •L — L v, C m p s- Lr; v, �n n R v o- r^ N t) O >.... m N N rl O D 8 N JJ ao c4. O O ro cp: in Ln - C N �n ` a. <Z C p C ti. C -.-"• C • __J C r 0. .d i O p V) O N O Vn — C Q) 0 C Ca !+ aI (pU -l _ = = a N N p o77 77 c_o n i s M O N L N N CO M C J ,� Q a--1 C L N n - CA .N4 m L N• — CO ao C a) _ .--, 4-, _ 0 0 CD CO • ro L C N U Lr') a) a) v� O• p0 O p Q Q_ In p a r. 1 d L 17 ab - O aco o > > 0 Cl) ce N J .� + - C C 5 -p C ro s_ ccl CU L r ro Q L L a) - ro C .N ._ �- N p +� N C �,� -L tO i co LO -0 E -6 a)co_ in a) C Q) M Q) O O n II Q t'j L no Vro co OaoA C cL —N , . 0 — � 0 -. N N .5 - re O ro c) N M ) C M ro C ro m m m — O• M J „,> m E N 1 a) i ^ co_ N E L a) M N `� M C v N aL) V 0 0 Oq C Q Q Z cn cn c ") O0 cu CU :4-1 v O vj -0 O c O Q) — c p .� Cl) LII C p coLre N O C' N UO N ro N re C n O% n1 — L C:1.0 N Q) CA QJ Qro) c, �' W Q) O L 'L C 0C •CcL) roCll . V V_ v v ro V c E M C C C... c a) C L C L C ' C QJ — Es L 0 ci) a) -n " U)to.o - c a) im} i J N N — — — C ro C C `` b%0 U C V Cl) E c co U O O �_ M M ro 0 v, D � 2 C O L co quo 1/41-1 to U C -- Cl) LI) M "D c 0 bA C a) .0 o_ C 7g Q) — m (��0-0 Cro Cn Cp LO N O `- "� O Ncll bCO 0 I ro a) ro (Iii C ca .O +� N ni Q --N = O N O Ca m f- m C� Q Z Q Q Li) o f C D i .3 Z a) M C m Ln }�-, 2 in v, L c O ,-. "' U) a C co C — VIo U v O o O >ro C yy� `� Ni-' �i • N M > Ov 7 8 z • V vi Ln r--- Ln cai 4 p ,'til �E./r; / '4 ' � / "� oi , .i,,,,.,:,--- `i ~ 4 a til D ►1 I v kN vl a) OAc 17 C 0 ',:1- 0 Iq a) a Q) v C Hi: L ,p o c 3 ( p M Oa) N1 vl O d- NC 8 ON -) -o cu cc 0 N L _ -N �- Q)cn OC C 2L... I—(-`k\k O,p a) •c 0 II ao _..1 ) O 8 .� \ \ \. \ a) e e e ao c v' a) a r Z O O •t d- •c O s. O L a) \ - U c — O p 3 `� = O O O = C) 0 1 4-, O a) QJ ,� y N a) O of P. C oC :y h 0 E N o °' . p rce •cC I✓ O c L N N I • I — _ _ c �>' I•n c O a — o _O cii ON \ ---_, V) (-)s- if) sl- rZ5 44:4- n 13c o c E n m\W O - -- 'Cl Z OV - J W — 'a v cL O C L g O - N -0 O � � � II c - 0_00 rr d L C D f� c _C L O L- a7 a) O ai O cn �' c° O 3 \`: N N v M O M a) N ,.n c-� N cn I o O r.,•, N I I 1 I I I ca) 8 O , O - N c� N V O O — O v O u c M M -o N rn -0 CD 0 c Li L v II ,` ` M cd L \ O a) O c c • aS C \ as (� C \ 4- \ 1 N O N a) _ L • N 0 Si' re L N J C/1 N LT, O N N 7 0 �` Nr- ,� O �' N ' � O II C 8 N g g o U g 8 ct k S 3 o M n L N — — N c� `r II II Q as N M O \ ) \ 2 C a Cl.) 0 le co 0 N 0. `^CO00 0 ro (]`fin) I - g — �". - N X (V M 0 5 L co O 8 °0 L 8 o C J = v g L -D X O — c pp ptu m O sit N N N L �'� c v O X N dy O S a—>) O N C — N UUO M [P1 — — — CO N ti-) U Q by N _ C d- C \O \O C d ate•+• L Y i t 4-. = N .LC 4-, O o� O ` O �Q L!i M M 152 L _c S -c L p ce -E0 CC 0.0 I OA LX O Q O __h N M N M (..„4' E ao`D 0 m i--- :�. W CT N I— :11-, cn I-• ..r LL. CO I-7�• :� N Q CO U Jcrrc coil co. PLANNING T+co 305 9357 P. 01 1 -F_fi ij '71,1;-:iJ--i_L±i1.`.H ri, .,_It'IF7`I:r1..:111LUL1i-k -...-••• `R 'N 1 ` -1171,, ' , 4, 7,x`7‘ - t S T' 7, au...0„ . DATE .= . - te et Waitilngton r DEPART OF RR!AND,WILAUFE* . , ts�ol ao.1D0 ROA?Men ' �,��,.�; no ci�oaocwr►N•o��++�.wA o1�as•ieilt• �+�,w� t afire WOO: Wild MOM Mkt!ii 1 i 11 wQ9 n fitted lei . i Post it` Fax Note 7671 Date — 1 4840' % M.. From f#_ 1, a ' AH , PhOf1A N Phone# I i • 00e911bex 16, 1996 . sxN — Fax ptsys %uvol6 . i /v Ratse1ssat Co1~ottrtiatiOn ° ATIONII0112 John Maness ; 73 Stats street aiskta,n4. Washinetoa 9649 Slotien' . No lan idiitten - Past "mum 441040 pioloct Tovoilend ter, TtsY Maty to facet 00%44, SeltteMA ant1, '.gi,nshLp 01 Nestii, APhgt 01 , wpm Leg Ns. 9,8•+0 i00-. 'Mass 171>KARI . noes we. loVele' aa: ent r i tTL b 'ens v idSste iMa] } seviRiveA the .eniibSl'1gego Q'° ticabisn set !• 0oaiMep ' the CD01taaX4t�i11i0�►a zwRetlis rr�lest nb�dCe#��AB at. th�>-i t,i�1R0 14, 3.924, but ve at* 1 nablii to ooegets.pt. ' Sox the isllosinq iteasolltt l s i State Hnvi eneental • rel, ActAW e) la o! ompthe liance cth #1� is pQ9ttlsed by tali ilio • 9►Yoiact ippseval• Please contact your l;ael pis !t county punning dooa*t*►eat !o: ibtst atiat *ells=frog paeoednsss. so ssoa ,es.tel■ aOa p:vcasa. hes beep ooRtplelitti, • Asses prouLde mitten: net&Sidst1sa SLAC thanes,tisa goy Saes yeti: i0L1;sA jIlitiwaLetLe*. $61%bet VIM, ,pp • pssaessea Ln a hear i?a s• ' :e9 to Leeuai the HF3 saatl as Bab iiittia7►� '110>!p Rll 'p�caa • A4torr this psoisrt. i9;neoaisas , we aro pulpwood to LIMO tits HM#. p*aaItionei t�'Aeeee%e lox esemtnte aefaxaing t the is shsiliir>h esombttiof'tens grow , the only otha>r onxesohd •iS000. s shank you loz your osspe�stiosen this 0aAt. 4: -A.:. LOG ITEM -.Q.' ' t ( JEFFERSON CO. PLANNING 360 385 9357 P. 02 • ��, wl •rw r... �iEti�rE.ir� '�1y 47� 1_3�ti Lftir=N 'STT F'T FI H,.tlzt_[,LIFE + P.2/3 . •t uy • • 1 I. . Steve ;ttvsia • i; . neagabeg 21, 19$5 - ' Page 2 • ti I • t • YeeP e aeai le .Qiaped on half Vniiwe teoeive the above- identified stitosmgtiph. ilessOapplieston vill bi pxoceilaa i •! the in oX* tLOa has been te4iiY0V We ap sociatt your pas euati in Silt *H arts teapxoteot, poll etusto and, mantle the !!�s ,P, Washington. =9ov have any giueati ona, r.OtdiM the-°stats. OS yams appILnat�ion, pillage Gail Meal (xnO) Ito-47)7. g H, 44r f . Y : . •',, . Orbi $o ' ttet a , ' mea Kabitat siologtat • . ' vc i. " !; Kapitat Pewit= ' . , ; , asobss• o .taea9s ' z.. 'i :. ' i 4 ata nave Guilt', von . , • Ti*.11111t 110111X. I . Jelixes Stovalt , PP ` Dennis ThaaaUQA, Jef f ekmaa Count 'slmaning' , • COP 1, , ...,i,..... Jaen aaeeett, "' ' . Joha Kansan, lost Otgia sox 11201,, Posh Iia41�oek, x71 11331 ' i ' , M • •, • . • • • . ► , , ., • •-• • ' • ti•�, 1. . . r ' . • . • • I ,, ►.• 'n I • S .S ' I . • • , t�.r. V f' • >• , „;: _ 1'.. s.' 4. JEFFERSON CO. PLANNING 360 395 9357 p. 03 , 7E:2 U '91. t,E FI:;H IILDLIFE c o l J �J• �vF'i 1 l I�F�H T FT P. a • . • • • • 1 --- 7�'-r- . 1 • REtQCATEO BOAT ao• 1-- . ,,,, 1 [ S c[sn RELOCATIO Rada J � �ba'IN 711113 I it ers N `� 1 TING DIlg o / ►tl4 — _+.1•1111111 .•. S. 311N .. ---, 13•6'1l6I f A-4 r--4,�Alr�jlr�s`r�.r-��..i=lisle..--r--_(rte--r-- �. 7 , I 1 1 1 -____- 23'4"XW' i 20, 44. SC : r 1 4D• r !e' i ;n, Er IIP e r 4e �r6-4•-4' • 2 4.44• ' 4, 1 TVP 132•+/ t iZ'+/- ..d f' •4^ r 75'+/ 8'-4' Tv - � v 72 • en I 11 0 01 0 L.. , , +�ipor t + i' •••••-•401:0:.••••40;•••••••$,.,.0 , , �� �.--t3d+/-—.1 f 1 b�..-�f GO'• EEzrgnNC ya. 1.30,+/ • e0 ; • • ,• • .•.•: • • #.• ••••••—•• •• yr „ 1;4F1' , } • • • • " . ... . . . I 'r ( t `1 74� PIQriDIP SED °Ew•tCE • �,�. .�.�.:L..�.�.�. ,� OuTI .•',,• • • • : •,• •,• . f .... ,I••.•.' .,. • •.• , ••,.••,•,• I. i . . • • N2 • L----1-.... ..1_..iikligill 1 .. 95-1-01600 • f 58 57 6 0 • • Townsend PortTownsend S9 Nears Hadlock EELGRASS TRANSECTS COUNTY; Jefferson STATE: W A • • dc EELGRASS BED LOCATIONS APPLICATION BY: Ray Hansen SC+u.C. t'- 120• SHEET 1 OF 4 DATE: 11/8/95i • r JEFFERSON CO. PLANNING 360 395 9357 P. 04 FB 02 •SDS .D-.-,:.1'9511 HASH ST LEFT r ISM.:HILE'LIF P..4 .rte S''6—i l—6 3 tY0 'V JO b 30Yd rte- 1. zpoulva osdr0 la•, t a4 1ew11Ga+n1 Tr* mart T NOSNVrt Avti:A9 '"1ddY NOIJNIHSYM :31415 DNI)'( :JO JliNf107 NOU335 .L 8�1 owl N0101.41$'NV! I_ lY 1 ant Q3cnM. i + 1 0 1 ;N VI 01 9 Abe ON3SNM01 o •e 3*01t 1 07 , 12fOd ')4001CYH 21Y3N amoaole Vas ;iy ^ YN4JVNI V NMI )4 001001 toad :le,1i 1`•1111111 /AM': „ 1ivaa dOOH 311e1 M7Y! Y1tt 1 1 ' 511210t 01XR Woolf nas+t s'C -- NoissladroJ 11314 n'1v0 .0.47N1%030 tat ' )i....iia..i1► `i�fiil�■r N01133S .9 1iIHi 1 en,1Y0,! typ11Y10'U ANN, attire 03010rS ONI)r701B 01105 lira 1f9'003Y% Q1/400011) ones ; iii ! _Stint 1r01 41,4j rat I SiOVA CM -AMU.I,E.,1111111111111111111III Ar 4messallei INIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIL\'•Inimr ss 710030 !X4 s / �Lll 3YcWi dZi 0;11 dd i31SlYl� .d , ' e I . NOi.L33S .t 3144 en1 1rp1 NOIlY101! VW44 t 7IiWI 030}Oh I o v- 1 NOLL33S Sit 1 iv' n N011YL01J NY4! , A 17 % SoOa ply- 6r11 tY01! -~ I%4V1I WO} 0, I e iiiiiiiirdt I QRl�d ofo1G1 a. q� v r v 1 Al .1/1/4.0.3 '{( { .r'I,• IX6%0018 QI1Q5^ /CC • >x+rt-m�1/o J ` '�j��. ,17!! ►1/4 1 + b1137YM 001S, snot-n,1/ to 1,'.130 0013 Y01/3 , e—' L 1 j SO 41 t4f 01414413 444 - : 00101/30 tat 41474 Qi9=40 � ). /N%8n4 Ivo, �'J v 1 i '1C` 1/ C•. r 1 I '�'� 004°. �' artrM 311/.00 1 ' i I, • au y/ ' 01•100019 04/11,fl0�jIS v dU A-.11 t lYo,! o_j 1430t431n+31 Q�1 1400101.11400101.1I 6n 1r III�...1 1 ..,," - I.�i! I JEFFERSON CO. PLANNING 360 385 9357 P. 05 • FCE1 OZ ?5 0:-D '=OFr i 01:61,4 ST DEPT F LH wT E P c t ti. r 14 • State of Washington DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE M iiirg Address: 600 Cap ici Way N•Olympia,WA 98501-1091 •(360)902.2200.TOO(360)902-2207 Main Chico Location_ Natural Resources Building• 1111 Washington Street SE'•Olympia.WA November 14, 1995 Mr. Ray Hanson do Steve Zuvela Waterfront Construction - f 75 State Street Kirkland,WA 98033 . . SUBJECT; Hydraulic Project Application-Expansion to Alcohol Plant Marina-Port Hadlock,Tributary to Port Townsend,Puget Sound,Section OS,Township 29 • North,Range 01 West,Jefferson County,WDFW Log No.00-B4176-01,VVRIA 17.MARI Dear Mr.Hanson: The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW)received the above-referenced Hydraulic Project Application on September 14, 1995. .We apologize for our tardy response but thought the letter had been sent out earlier. We are unable to complete processing at this time for the following reason(s): •State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)-Compliance with SEPA is required by law prior ' to issuance of the Hydraulic Project Approval, Please contact your local city or county planning department for information regarding SEPA procedures. As soon as the SEPA process has been completed,please provide written notification of compliance,from your local jurisdiction,so that your application may be processed ha a timely manner. • Ptstposa DosProject modifications are rcauiir WDFW has reviewed the plans and specifications for the proposed project and has determined that they do not provide adequate protection for fish life. It appears from the information you have provided that the marina expansion could result in additional adverse impacts to eelgrass beds which have already been impacted by the project. Eelgrass is a very important marine habitat and is listed as a"Habitat of Special Concern"under WAC Chapter 220-110. We believe expansion of the marina is practicable without impacting the eelgrass beds. We suggest a meeting to discuss alternative designs that would eliminate potential eelgrass impacts. For example,it appears that the space between the three'sets of floats could be reduced. The plans indicate a turnaround distance of 75 feet for vessels of 50 feet between the second and third set of floats and 50 feet for vessels of 34 feet between the second and most landward set of floats, Although it may not be the optimum for maneuvering vessels,reducing these distances and other adjustments to the design would result in the same number of desired slips while reducing eelgrass impacts. JEFFERSON CO. PLANNING 360 385 9357 P. 06 . TES o ''7:14, 1,33'TIFN 5T C'EPT FI'3H7:HILQLWFE: t . . Mr. Ray Hanson November 14, 1995 • Page2 i • • In addition,WDFW Mss need to scow if the Prohibited Shellfish Harvest Zone will.change as a result of the marina expansion. Please contact Frank Meriwether at the Department of Health(360)153- 3517 with regard to this!nue. Oeoduak beds that coup be impacted by this paled are toroted in Port Townsend north of Kala Pt.to the west and Crane Pt,!Ott*east,plus four beds to the south of the cut In Oak Bay(see attached map and tract description from the 1995 Geoduck Atlas). In addltion, Intertidal shellfish beds in the area could be impacted. Your proposal is placed on hold until we receive the sbovaidentlflal information. Your appliaaator% will be processed after the requested information has been received. As mentioned earlier. we safest a meeting to discuss alternatives to the current project design that will reduce Impacts to fish end shellfish reams*and their habitats. Please contact me at(360)$95.4757 • ifyou wish to set up a meeting. we appreciate your 000peration in ow efforts to protect,perpetrate,sad manage the Ash resources of the state of Washington. Sincerely, •3hir.'4. )144c. irePea • at i.Baatner Ares Habitat Biologist • Habitat Programs • • IB;bk(30;Nov95) • • • c: Dave Oufler,WDFW Tim Flint,WDFW • • . . • lures S DO - .. •,. .... • Denis Thomason,Ieffersen County Planning Dept, • Frank Meriwethear,DOH • ATsnG14llffw*S - 6140 t4cks MAP , 0•44041rrtem • • • • • • • . l •t �I 11 JEFFERSON CO. PLANNING 360 385 9357 P. 07 . 1 1 '1 WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION, INC. , P.p. Box 3208 MOMO r, KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON 98083 (206}ata-3600 LETTER ;n 10/24/95 '3 Date k; TO .7011 tkettner r SubleCt lock Marina 3 Dept. Of !.sh & Wildlife 1 Li fTl ,71 aaO�1R2 ;''1 lig►r at fa . drams that is a revised drathat correctly depicts the existing pier and breakwater. �. The correct.information was taken front a. survey done bX Clark Land Office ice a.n 7171 - - . .,.. W. have revised the configuration of some of the outboard fingers: to pnavide arnar`..g for some ]arc boats- T 'center ter fi ... x .ndd4.tions have been , changed OA p snide a.greater_.w drh_)e n.._�inge.s. .. 'the_exist-i . ... .. .. .._._-n9 tivintgf, the. � '. .. flugez piers.will__remaa n,.as is. If you.have any_questions ai-the_ ctes.tfr. the.draw3ngs.please..c_ail..►+ae.at_ 628-3600., i . Thanks, St Please reply i,,.. _ 1, (4 aaew� ❑ No neplq necessary � ~` ,za 40%Pre-Cont Can t•10%AaRC0,0topRCorona I I: i I I 1 I , I 1 • •-d�Cffi :- Tri - i ��r _ �_ ' =€ice i {�y41 56 . dri - _ State of _ hinge DEPARTMENTFSH ANODE-DUPE `' . AaitSig QC CON Wry N#Orticria.WA inDioi i 2( )6242111-4 VO(DC7 902.2207 ,11 Orkee Let '►: N1 '. g€111 via4hotgo Soml.sE,Dojo,WA Post-W Fax Note tar 1 f hate r P gages ...:-.. .,_. -...._. Via..... !TD Froe; ,,, _ = FEB - 5 1996 ..:.i xirragt4Twzi: 4611 Ha *r JEFFERSON COUNTY 7 gi t t MIT CENTER__ �J l i n . r tg- PERMIT ER =ms - s� � _ hsac;i14. Pf4ect. Sppll.oatton - na Inn Addition - Seep itownetni aay, Tt t tary t0 nowt S+oUnde Se+Ctian OS, _os =$p 29 Nortlij3Rhge 01 West 4sffesean CenntY, 1, cor_,.p too No, 9800-g WRIA 1 .119iRl gl = nr , lUie#6,4o _ , . wagas11106ft Depart-44nai , ieh and Vildi is tWD W) to+seivsd the anavedreferonc d H replie ProJoat Applieatian on September 71A.0 1994 , but we alto lay; 1.; tD e,ee plots.I pa oaiSeing at, this time . ,r;ste Environmental 3 ,3. i t (d ) ;;� compliance with iii,+ ik _3 za ed by last ri=ot do lea' the Hydraulic ?toact t+pploval. Plqate contact your local city or eaurtr planning department lor, information regarding OSSA , pg®esdt#aas d as soon . g:.th■ asipA prooses. harp been completed* please provide written:notification ee compliance* heal yews local -,.‘,EibaLotres, oeg 'hat yolir application may be . pro e In g cel £ . Ac a4,„ 46 214144 is t, t7,a7 -viow. ic prepared to issued era HPA Lot this p o sot. 7,14euessery, 'we era prepared to iseg+e ,_ liq SpA gvnAitionsd to;a***4nt for comments regarding the sholleish pro l.bltian vt tilts Vapt, of Health* Wit-- the int -the only other tonzesol d , 1l_ub. s. Tar. .7.1:o go: yak= co pegr ion411 this -eau: nriTI,U32 '9E eq:4212:UW14.11*1 7 DEFT rIVVIV77FE 'ril? , ,..• , . ., 'll . . - -----Ifi; ;V:..;---.71- ' ' ---- - - = --, rl- arlmter.- 4t, .,r.. -, ,.! ..,- . . • .,: --.2 .1. .i.'1 e .,_ ' 441T to placna al 1414 Vil'htll we tecOve :trio a4ove- 'dent1.116 ihf*thetlen, talwiappliAlton vill Le pgaiiiiiita 14ta2 14 be 1. ve; ntelet4# _ .. 4.ft 2.=. --2m1 "ta yolir ZCODi,VAtillt. LA 0011 cEA,40we -.- r. G i --a46 4,4*g, alp rulfplItho 0/ the atate oi em67-70-e'antm d, Nian 4J'. 4g4" 24 ". - --' WaanlAQZ%- rig. :1 vAz h%V= 'any vagmlorta, te0erdinte the- s.t.1.0 0 , . . .AV7.13. 4; 0-111 pluAae OZ1- I ma BA (360) W447, julAte'40-bri , , -,------... - --____ _,=-.. L.--------- _,,,:„. -,, ettr acist 1 11.1; • 1 . 6 '''" % NAnirat Plegzil , .... 6 I • I .1. .6-' J1-4!Ir604Q1VeC96 6 .. !Pi' ' 16.; r!' . omet OAVe Outlex# WaW i- A Tlet.rlirme wzre ., , leilzoo Stega:c0 64,4 , V. , P---—4 - Thomason, Jstioron ookult*,- 71annAns . venniii ' 34c10. uoomettf CC,I .aalf Bit ...,A, ,s , •i at 6,6,mils.6 61 =7-Ahn lianMen: roa,. wt-.001 we -- -4- rt -44 ' SOX 136Sp, iovt Hai7.7400x, . . --, ,,..... v. .. . : , , . , . -. .mimmiemai FEE 02_E 02 S..� 02_-ter i WASH :�I :`QEF? i_ ..__DLir E F. II m—_ .------- %DG../- — -... . - .m i f fRCLOCA160 rLOATT 1-----210'41RELOCATED FLOAT I #- .. PROPOSED CONCRETE i EEXISTING PILING ppAN 6_BREAKyyy�rAtEQ E��ffiSTING la — 13p rt.u.WATEn 1 rt CNtliNCCIs tayo ORCAI{WA la _ _.� - e-,.e: / LL �- r$' 141N ,e f ?3'6'xS4 / r 6'3 r t I j 238'Xea' I �74'�;L. Ni. i - 1 d0. I IA' 20' . . . . 64' 33'6"X64' ' — i i 23'6`�x84' ! T'Yp� `- .,w--Ld 132'+��d'_4` i _ ...11... •-4 —} �. - j 4•a.:j 1.32'41- , 32'4-4-- ,yP I i m 75'./- - B'-4" I PR6Pr`jcc0 '•. a'-a 7I 7 32 r "7�4'-4' �1A / 4 •• • i I i E a i 1 • ' • i• 4 • i. 1 i it ` t1 \ „ • i -ff - • . . • 0 y I 1...„4„.....4...r.. r� II 3. ► _ .J f 50' : EgVINC gn. .•-- 130'+/- \ ...1 6O'rt- ..- ■ i SGCTiONS • • 45'.01- ?� - is I il IF 1 • d":71 . 11 ; 1 '.'_'.'..,...•_'.', _ . , , , , _ _ . _ _ , 4 , , kr'-.1771'77777-) • Td HEAD • r +F { N'(.1411:;‘ .I'' t r r�: :'r�r`r'r' 11 4�F PIER ; '" .• .• I = MI •14`, i •,, I re Fll r+ I LPROM:TED EVRACE •••••1....... .f. .� . '' ' r{ t I pU41P-OUT • ' ' ' :• -'1 • 9 ii i _ i. i. 11 11 I a. it if F. �•• i, •O HEAD t OF PIER- •1- • • ni I i Ns N6 E. if = Tf`+ ` ` .`,; ••`,— •I LINE OF M,H.W. trm N3 i El' • II '"w 95-I-01600 11 0 11 ----- � _ `� . ° n IN Port Townsend 1 9. Near: Hadlock 11 EELGRASS TRANSECTS COUNTY; Jefferson STATE: WA is & EEL.GRASS BED LOCATIONS SHEET 3 OF 4 DATE HansenRay 11/8/95 } 31 pi y FEE 32 -96 O3:_.'SFM Ni ISH ST DEPT F __:H'2JiIi Ili TFP- P.4 tr— se— 3av0 40 •30Vd II 43ZNIvA1'O 034w4 LOH 38 Ol 3a0;+MO 4 liv 310N .¢ NOSNVH AVW AO iddb it NO1ONIHSVM :3IVIS ONI}I ".do A1 �Nt100 NOL1335 L rN011Y101+ fM'i+0� _ .1van1 iroij -.. _.._.- �lisela 03001a NiNe. A C n JN3SNM01 p 9A c Naos MN). p \1Y�j5 f+194� ? .L Od `>0O10 H V3N� dNiN3o,e tilos c Aib vR� VVi V NNI ?1OO1OdH 1�0d ` A A il, VIDVA 1,XZ I i 1 -sa3,bM c,.xp 1I v'J.3�1 dOOH 31Id !. a,. •� ii SGOa naHI t NO'55 9adY Q L PN>Q30 9XL :t '3915 KW!..; .9/q-1 1 r— n �� _ _ NO1133S .9 II3 r+10.11/10% 'Q% 11 / Ill i Ent 1Y01+ 7115b1d 9aC1Qn o v v gotta na 1 0NiH70'�E OIlp5 I rivio 3 nO0 ''- III 1 7 r ntr0 .R 5 I / �' QNISItiti,s 0i103 �- _ldn�, E,dCIOC-i ;I I IA ►Ir A,�5 II L 1. } _ vr4rj vXL i i s31ex Bt XC 1111 ,. - It i 1 i JNIN030 En II 1 I fl ,4S r 9 E 51 iCy F;l �_M / ,3Nttla_ U: 03110S �na.il a99H 3^! ,a�s nivti z? z & NO1103S t r 3,�a gni 'VO's I e ; 3ilg.e. G3Cl3h P P o , v r 1, 11 NO:I03S SS' N'Jt1Yi0ls Wbu' ` - 11 hl*'7 Q! 9NIX9018 QI1QE V z. Bnl ttl8lj `�i��'1 AA,., '.LSb�d 03ti3OtY 800a MM.,. - - -._ NOISS3adIti00 f�uu'I. (p-l. 7A-WO $I ��l�i �A1A 5riYI `,) b0 !_ CNN:W-1E OI195111111k .�. k _ i Sb? !x 4sXi ii ,' iii, r7., ,xz 1 -g z.a ILi ,_m Wye, '11Y13Q 1.VO1. - -.. - ..,_----- it i 1 5631wM 0• ac 9NIYla30 EXZ : _ - sa9lYrn 9.xc +„t' .i. \ ds* 4C4�Vlale LdNiH034 9SL NM'S Wdd.14W 5 � ' Y{M Bri ivoi.4 I 1 I 1444.414., '"r4111. I ' O.' 831VM 31rnrv0a °= 1 i 7 ___ - / q}£ I 1NIX3019 OtXV- ii3SOON na41li. dAl ;3/o t NQI5 B%S V-- ..-.0 dil .0-.1i) 9� ,�� i• K.Ort_1 9nl NOLLVlO1.1 -= L N 3 a 3n ' r-` f v ' FEB CZ ' 16 CZ: OFM HASH ST DEFT FISH&WILDLIFE F.';_ I 9 1 _fir r`'! State of Wasnln ton DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Ma l ra Address: 604 Cap.+cl Way N•Olympia,WA 98501-1091 • 3cO7 S02-2200,TDD 360' 02-22t7 Main CWee Location, V?•.u.'2i Resources Building' 1111 Wesnlrg n Street SE' CiyIT.p!a. `,'JA ` s-.-mbe 1 ern _ Mr km'Hanson Waterfront Atl_ em mublVr ” S-v _ Street Kirkland WA 988:133 .. . SUBJECT: Hydraulic Project Application-Expansion to Alcohol Plant Marina-Port Hadlock, Tributary to Port Townsend,Puget Sound,Section 05,Township 29 North, Range 01 West,Jefferson County,WDFW Log No. 00-B4176-01,WRIA ,,,moi_, pear =•vir= l-Pulson The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW)received the above-referenced Hydraulic Project Application on September 14, 1995. We apologize for our tardy response but thought the letter had been sent out earlier. We are unable to complete processing at this time for the following State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) - Compliance with SEPA is required by law prior to issuance of the Hydraulic Project Approval. Please contact your local city or county planning department for information regarding SEPA procedures. As soon as the SEPA process has been completed, please provide written notification of compliance,from your local jurisdiction, so that your application may be processed in a timely manner. ' jos e yen -Project nil.flations are req aired WDFW has reviewed the plans and specifications for the proposed project and has determined that they do not provide adequate protection for fish life. It appears from the information you have provided that the marina expansion could result in additional adverse impacts to eeigrass beds which have already been impacted by the project. Eelgrass is a very important marine habitat and is listed as a"Habitat of Special Concern" under WAC Chapter 220-110, We believe expansion of the marina is practicable witheut impacting the eeigrass beds, We suggest a meeting to discuss alternative designs that would eliminate potential eeigrass impacts. For example. it appears that the space between the three sets of floats could be reduced. The plans indicate a turnaround distance of 75 feet for vessels of 50 feet between the second and third set of floats and 50 feet for vessels of 34 feet between the second and most landward set of floats. Although it may not be the optimum for maneuvering vessels, reducing these distances and other adjustments to the design would result in the same number of desired slips while reducing eelgrass impacts. , FE-E: - _ _ _` T__LFE F r, In addition. WDFW will need to know if the Prohibited Shellfish Harvest Zone will change as a result of the marina expansion, Please contact Frank Meriwether at the Department of Health(360) 753- 35I7 with regard to this issue, Geoduck beds that could be impacted by this project are located in port Townsend north of Kala Pt.to the west and Crane Ft, to the east, plus four beds to the south of the cut in Oak Bay(see attached map and tact description from the 1995 Geoduck Atlas). In addition, is e dei shellfish beds in the area could be impacted. 0 Your proposal is placed on hold until we receive the above.identiied information. Your applicarion will be processed after the requested information has been received, As mentioned earlier, we suggest a meeting to discuss alternatives to the current project design that will reduce impacts to fish and shellfish resources and their habitats. Please contact me at(360) S95-4757 f ou w ....t==-tt up a meeting. We appreciate your cooperation in our efforts to protect,perpetuate, and manage the fish resources of tine rate of at.n r ton, - r e _aoi lolog t - _-_ I — ------- -- •• ...._... .....________ • M Uri WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION, INC. Th? GiAO' P.O. Box 3208 KIRKLAND, WASHINGTON9808'3 LETTER (no 828-3600 Cl' El Dale10/24/95 - (.11 -u John ii0ettrter Subject -Hadlock iviarina. - i5 Dept. of Fish & -Wildlife co .. . to ---1• - -• t7...1 rrii ) 111 .,. -.., :,,,,,,,,,,-----------7-------- / John, II) V-1 Here is a revised drawing that correctly depicts the existing pier and breakwater. t77, r-- ,..., The correct information was taken from a survey done by Clark Land Office in ro Segpim. We have revised the configuration of some of the outboard fingers to provide moorage for some larger boats. The, center finger additions have been changed to provide a greater width between fingers. The existing portion of 1-he finger piers will remain as is. If you_have any_guestions en the changes or the drawings please call, me at 82- ... i Thanks, Steve Zuvela tkrPlease reply ri No reply necessary aolcvm-crics itIrcaprpw•10%Pgast-Cort4urrq,, : „soNc,0 kel,,� JEFFERSON COUNTY PERMIT CENTER �; off 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 SBINCsS March 6, 1995 Mr. Craig Sears 2134 NW 204th Seattle, WA 98117 Re: Old Alcohol Plant development; Shoreline Permit SDP92-0015, Long Plat LP08-92 , Conditional Use IZ46-93 Dear Mr. Sears: I am in receipt of your letter dated February 12 , 1995 and the site plan prepared by Madronna Planning and Development Services which depicts the proposed revisions to the referenced development. The project as revised is for the development of 25 detached single family residences and 10 townhouses on the portion of the site easterly of the hotel as Phase I and the development of a 24 unit "west wing addition” as Phase II, respectively. You also propose construction of tennis courts on Lot 49 southerly of the Alcohol Loop Road where three 21-unit condominiums were previously proposed. I have reviewed these revisions and have the following comments: * On October 18, 1993 Jefferson County approved the referenced permits. They authorize construction of 40 attached single family residences on 45 platted lots easterly of the existing hotel and four 21-unit condominium units, including one on the site of the proposed "west wing addition" . * Proposed Lots 19 and 20 occupy a portion of the original Open Space Tract E. It is not clear whether the proposed lot lines for Lots 18-26 conform to the shoreline setbacks and open space configuration depicted on the preliminary plat and shoreline site plan. The final plat should clearly depict that the open space areas and the shoreline residential setbacks have not been diminished from those in the preliminary plat approval. With the possible exception of these considerations, the proposed residential development on the easterly portion of the site is consistent with the referenced approvals. Building Environmental Health Development Review Public Works Building Permits Septic Permits Subdivision, Zoning Road Approach 379-4450 Water Review & Shoreline Permits Permits &Addresses Inspection Hotline 379-4450 379-4463 379-4450 379-4455 1-800-831-2678 FAX: (206) 379-4451 ref • * As per our conversation today, the proposed "west wing addition" would be a 24-unit condominium managed by Mr. Hanson. This would allow either sale or rental of the individual units. The condominium is proposed to have the same square feet coverage as the 21-unit condominium approved for the site under the referenced approvals. This is consistent with the referenced approvals provided that the square foot coverage, height, setback, and parking requirements are met. The final plat should clearly depict that these requirements are met. * Provided that the relevant requirements and shoreline conditions are met, the revised project is consistent with Shoreline Permit SDP92-0015. If the project is further revised, it would require further review to determine its conformance with SDP92-0015 and possibly a revision to the permit as provided for in Shoreline Master Program Section 6. 404 Revisions. * I concur with your assertion that the project as modified significantly reduces density, clearing and grading, impervious surfaces, storm water runoff, visual effects, and demand for public services, including roadways and water supplies. The project is consistent with and subject to the conditions of approval of the referenced permits and the Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance issued for the proposal on June 8 , 1993 . Additional environmental review is not required. * Development of the covered tennis courts would require a building permit and may require erosion and sedimentation control measures and storm water management facilities. Please contact the Jefferson County Building Official and the Public Works Department prior to construction. In closing, based on your letter, the Madronna site plan, and the considerations set forth above, the project is consistent with the referenced approvals. No additional review is required at this time. Prior to final plat approval by Jefferson County, the proposal will be subject to administrative review by the Environmental Health and Public Works Departments and the Development Review Division and approval by the Board of County Commissioners to ensure that the project hasbeen developed in conformance with the referenced approvals. If you have any questions or if I can be of assistance, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sinc re a es W. arson As ociate Planner Jerry Smith Mike Ajax, Building Official Madronna Planning and Development • FEB 2 I I995 -Cane (111E Con�.u.Ctc.n9 J. CRAIG SEARS JEFFERSON COUNTY 2134 NW 204th • Seattle, WA 98177 PERMIT CENTER (206) 947-6326 February 12, 1995 Mr. Jim Pearson, Jefferson County Permit Center 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 RE: Old Alcohol Plant Binding Site Plan Dear Mr. Pearson, Enclosed is a copy of our proposed Conceptual Site Plan for the Old Alcohol Plant property in Hadlock as prepared by Madrona Planning and Development Services. We are asking for an administrative review and approval of the proposed revisions to the previously approved Canoe Cove Binding Site Plan on behalf of Mr. Ray Hansen, the current property owner and proprieter of the existing hotel, restaurant and marina facility occupying the site. Mr. Hansen, in contrast to the previous proposal submitted by Alexander and Ventura, desires to maintain the existing operation as is. with the addition of 25 single family residences on 26 lots (one residence is existing) together with 10 townhouse units on the eastern portion of the property, and a 24 unit west wing addition located west of the existing buildings. While not shown at this time on the submitted Conceptual Site Plan, a couple of covered tennis courts are proposed on the south side of Alcohol Loop Road (Oak Street) by separate permit. Mr. Hansen would like to design and construct the infrastucture for Phase I (26 lots & 10 townhome units) of the project this summer. The west wing expansion would be built in 1996. The proposed modifications to the site plan result in significantly reduced impervious surface coverage, density, visual impact, and service demand. There is a corresponding increase in usable open space, retained vegetation, and pedestrian access via a trail system throughout the project. Supplemental landscaping is proposed where necessary to enhance privacy and screen the site from adjacent properties. LOG ITEM The bedroom count for Phase I will be approximately 76, and Phase II will have 48 bedrooms. Bedroom allocation to lots and units will be assigned during the site engineering for the project and would be enforced through covenants and/or instruments recorded at the time of final plat on lots, and with the maintenance entity on the multi-family residences. We believe that the proposed modifications to this project, in virtually all aspects; have significantly less impacts than the originally approved Canoe Cove Binding Site Plan. The State Environmental Policy Act threshold determination, Shorelines Act permits, Conditional Use approvals and variance approvals should still remain valid with no additional approvals other than administrative review of the proposed modifications. ,Jim, feel free to call me should you have any questions or need additional information. Should you need additional copies of the site plan, please call Rick Sepler at Madrona Planning & Development Services. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, 3. Craig Sears cc: Mr. Ray Hansen Mr. Walt Tabler Mr. Rick Sepler Isla-1,t_c (/ 1) s9-)p-95 41-51-476A-31 V `t Nrid'd VNcidad I . .17W 104 IC s4/H ' 10 441°01 N1 %,& l l ')NO / 4N1 '1 o-lio-)'I d a10 1t ilk 111/ ‘ NlosvoNv1 , °tl 4 3 a y 4 s -I 9 1 3'04-01!5 JL iirktt4 ..r. ' . .n'_ wo _0 ) e? - 4Ir '41!)(5 :- • -4 til ` _10, ,'.- ` _ I S yiii. iii. • �- IA- i tiv • .4thol4)A 0 .,,.1•( . )4:4 • v,!,;-.7 111141-41.-- ..4v, -411"--*-1,1,-:-'). Aii• • 4______: • - . _ / tim _,,,r.„7,41k* 141 p 1 _ : ,, i' .ffigreirP �..' "� IIS; b.... AO • S iGnIr$ i�5i*5 'fr an 1/ ri 5 J 0 --) \. .-storA..,1 or, i4/- 9,,gs 14549 At _,.f. . ., i • --, 1-rem. -- . / • . - . / - a ! -.ti SPof'a ,91 aasodoW iiv •i ` • • zl / • .. *P �V 1 _ i • ' • 1 - . ,�11�% . '' 11 ' • / i J S .111A 91'15 ��• I . 'Mr -/-.........y• send 4f*Nas 1 fr -S019! Nlv�c] liN4iX9 / � .li .5 ) #'4f �!X d ,. . 1, , �J_ u 7 / / C( V - ::,1 s -.t . , / /� 4up ,‘ . 4...241.is -nii4 Iv vq•59cr?.1 .,-- - 0 / 1 f .:".•."-") -:-b %ssr/i Ryorci " • G. . .. , /, , 9. ••••. 1161 .. ....4 .?v_i_:.: :::---_,-2;, . ,, :.. .......„.4.74.- . , ..,,,, . _ /.. , ..):47,..,._.;.,.:..... ,,c.k.., 4 --E• Y?(---.. i • 4• ' !• yl...,/,-<:- :1 t451-4V3."9 (4r 4)-3(v t.,;,: -. - k 4 .. 4; • ' I/ ,I • \ .) / ..'' .- • ..tom` \. �� � �' / ' ! • • \ 4 ) 3 •/- - , ,/, ,_, ..4,-. ,.., .. . , „..,,, , , iiwv , . • . ‹, (--- • .„,,..ss- 4' \ • / r' . h 141%444 .)--3-k47 • • . / - . v� I / \'ir LI ,IIIIK ���V �L l '` / .7- , , •1. lb . l . / . • , . . . �,� c..,k14 • .0\7", ..„,,,,,,,. • ,.. ./.),F'd-r,' tll • r Y fir.-13 }I5 s , - Ili I / , / -vocal- s 5411 - •-vvulS SH-4 , • a i E i K JEFFERSON COUNTY SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WASHINGTON STATE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT (RCW 90.58) PERMITTEE: Alexander and Ventura COUNTY DATE ISSUED: October 18, 1993 JEFFERSON ILDWG DEPT). PLAS TYPE OF ACTION: General c 7 1993 TYPE OF USE: Conditional CASE NUMBER: SDP92-0015 APPLICATION DATE: October 26, 1992 PROPOSAL: A mixed use residential and commercial development on the site of the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Marina and adjoining property. The proposal includes the following: 1) Renovation of the west wing of the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Restaurant building (west wing of the old alcohol plant) to create 8 residential artist studio condominiums, a restaurant, and a recreation center with swimming pool; 2) Demolition of the east wing of the old alcohol plant which had been previously converted to a hotel; 3) Construction of 44 attached single family residences; 4) Construction of four 21-unit condominiums; 5) Construction of roads, utilities, and parking areas with 213 spaces; and 6) Designation of open space. There is an existing single family residence on the proposal site. The proposal includes an offsite community drainfield located south of the Oak Bay County Road. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The proposal site is described as Tax 19, 22, 23, and 24 in Section 1; Tax 21 in Sections 1 and 12; and Tax 23 and 24, Lots 2-12, Block 7 of Bay View Addition, and Lots 35-40 of lrondale Acre Tracts in Section 12, together with adjoining tidelands, all in Township 29 North, Range 1 West, W.M. WATERBODY AND/OR ASSOCIATED WETLANDS: Port Townsend Bay SHORELINE OF STATE-WIDE SIGNIFICANCE: No SHORELINE DESIGNATION:Urban CONDITIONS: Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program and the following conditions: 1 . In order to avoid significant impacts related to storm water runoff, soil erosion, and wetlands functions and values, all clearing, grading, excavation, and construction of roadways, driveways, parking lots, residences, and utilities shall be consistent with the grading and storm drainage control plan submitted with the proposal and approved by the Jefferson County Public Works Department. • LOG ITEM � 5 2. In order to avoid significant adverse impacts related to storm water runoff, soil erosion, and wetlands functions and values, all soils exposed during the course of development activities shall be seeded or otherwise revegetated and stabilized to the satisfaction of the Jefferson County Public Works Department. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall provide to the Planning and Building Department certification to this effect from the Public Works Department. 3. In order to avoid significant adverse impacts related to storm water runoff, soils erosion, and wetlands functions and values, all applications for residential building permits shall include a soil erosion and storm water management plan which meets the requirements of the Jefferson County Public Works Department. 4. In order to avoid significant adverse impacts to wildlife populations and habitat and wetlands functions and values, prior to final plat approval the applicant shall plant a vegetative buffer on the portion of Open Space Tract B adjacent to the wetland on Open Space Tract A and enhance the existing buffer on Open Space Tract A. The purpose of the planting shall be to provide a vegetated buffer between the wetland and the proposed structures on Lots 1-5. The planting shall be conducted in conformance with a detailed plan prepared by a qualified wildlife biologist or botanist that has been reviewed and approved by the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department. Prior to preparation of the plan the consultant shall contact the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department. Inspection of the revegetation and enhancement shall be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist or botanist after planting and after the first two growing seasons. If replanting is necessary to replace unsuccessful stock, it shall be carried out at the applicant's expense. 5. In order to avoid significant adverse impacts to wildlife populations and habitat and wetlands functions and values, there shall be no clearing, removal of understory vegetation or trees, firewood cutting, construction of pathways, or other development on Open Space Tract A and that portion of Open Space Tract B that is within the vegetated buffer referred to in Mitigation Measure #4 of this Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance. 6. In order to avoid significant adverse impacts to wildlife populations and habitat and wetlands functions and values, prior to final plat approval the applicants shall place an educational and interpretive sign adjacent to the shoreline and the wetland buffer to alert residents to the fragile nature of wetlands and the important functions that they perform. The content of this sign shall be prepared in consultation with a qualified biologist. The size and location of the sign shall be subject to review and approval by the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department. 7. In order to avoid significant adverse impacts to the historic character of the Lower Hadlock Bay Historic Site, prior to the issuance of a building permit for the demolition of the east wing of the alcohol plant, the applicant shall document the east wing of the alcohol plant through photographs and measured drawings. This documentation shall be conducted by an architect or engineer experienced in preservation work and shall include architectural and structural details of both the interior and exterior of the building. This documentation shall be provided to the Jefferson County Historical Society. SDP92-001 5 Alexander and Ventura Page 2 8. In order to avoid significant adverse impacts to the City of Port Townsend's water distribution system and to the fire fighting capacity of Jefferson County Fire Protection District No. 1, prior to final plat approval the applicant shall submit to the City of Port Townsend Public Works Department for their review and approval a water distribution system plan that has been prepared by a licensed civil engineer. 9. In order to avoid significant adverse impacts to the City of Port Townsend's water distribution system and to the fire fighting capacity of Jefferson County Fire Protection District No. 1, prior to final plat approval the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of Port Townsend Public Works Department subject to approval by Jefferson county to fund improvements to the water distribution system adjacent to the proposal site that are commensurate with the impacts related to the proposal. 10. The proponent shall comply with all regulations of the State Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58), RCW 217.44.040, RCW 27.53.060 and WAC 25-489 regarding archaeological sites. These regulations prohibit intentional disturbance of archaeological or burial sites without prior approval and provide protocols for actions following discovery of such sites. 11 . If Native American archeological resources are discovered during construction, a qualified archaeologist shall be immediately dispatched to systematically analyze the findings. All construction or excavation on that portion of the project site shall immediately cease and measures shall be taken to prevent further disturbance prior to analysis by a qualified archaeologist. 12. Prior to final plat approval, the proponents shall convey an easement on Open Space Tracts A and B and on the intertidal areas of the site in favor of the general public for access, use, and enjoyment for the life of this or any similar project. The home owners association shall retain the right to reasonably regulate the use of those open space tracts and the intertidal area by establishing rules and regulations, such as those to protect landscaping, regulate noise, and prevent nuisances, subject to approval by Jefferson County. The proponent shall place informational and directional signs that clearly indicate the location of public access areas. NOTICE: 1 . This permit may be rescinded by the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners or the Washington State Shorelines Hearings Board upon the finding the permittee has not complied with the conditions herein, pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(8). 2. The permittee is liable for all damages to public and private property arising from violation of any provisions of the permit hereby granted, including the cost of restoring the affected area to its condition prior to violation and possible court costs that may ensure from violation, pursuant to RCW 90.58.230. 3. Construction pursuant to this permit will not begin nor is to authorized until thirty (30) days from the date of filing as defined in RCW 90.58. 140(6) and WAC 173-14- 090, or until all review proceedings initiated within thirty days from the date of such filing have terminated, except as provided in RCW 90.58.140(5.a-c). Construction or substantial progress toward construction of the permitted development shall begin within two (2) years from the date of this permit and completion of the permitted development shall be accomplished within five (5) years from the date of this permit. SDP92-0015 Alexander and Ventura Page 3 4. Nothing in this permit shall excuse the permittee from complying with any other federal, state, or local statut- . ordinances, or regulations applicable to this project, • - • Wit• RC • p . 411h.—mrpoir, Alliff / �: I- .rd E. f ojt, 't' an Jefferson County Board of Commissioners • SDP92-001 5 Alexander and Ventura Page 4 THIS SECTION IS FOR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT OR A VARIANCE. Date received by the Department: ' 7q1 ,3 Approved: Denied This conditional use permit/ - is approved/./ by the Department pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW. Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following additional terms and conditions: \ tAC L> L.C:T-T CP,, • 0,,0 Author'-• Department Of ficial Date C:\SDP\SDP92015.Per SDP92-0015 Alexander and Ventura Page 5 • • , DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY CONDITIONS Shoreline Substantial Development/Conditional Use Permit #1993-15134-Conditioned Alexander and Ventrua - Applicant Jefferson County Permit #SDP 92-0015 Condition #4 shall be amended to read: In order to avoid significate adverse impacts to wildlife populations and habitat and wetlands functions and values, prior to final approval the applicant shall plant a vegetative buffer on the portion of Open Space Tract B adjacent to the wetland on Open Space Tract A and enhance the existing buffer between the wetland and the proposed structure on Lots 1 thorough 5. The planting shall be conducted in conformance with a detailed plan, prepared by a qualified wildlife biologist or botanist, that has been reviewed and approved by the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department and the Washington State Department of Ecology. Inspection of the revegetation and enhancement shall be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist or botanist after planting and after the first two growing seasons. A report of the results of this inspection shall be provided to the Department of Ecology within one month of the inspection. If replanting is necessary to replace unsuccessful stock, it shall be carried out at the applicants' expense Condition #12 shall be amended as follows Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall convey an easement on Open Space Tracts A and B and on the intertidal areas of the site in favor of the general public for access, use, and enjoyment for the life of this or any similar project. The home owners association shall retain the right to reasonably regulate the use of those open space tracts and the intertidal areas by establishing rules and regulations, such as those to protect landscaping, regulate noise and prevent nuisances, subject to approval by Jefferson County. The proponent shall place informational and directional signs that clearly indicate the location of public access areas and parking spaces dedicated to use by the public. N� COQ 1 \ STAIR V � 1EFFERS� Ill i?1NC; DST• • °_€ im.... ..;4. �� OE.0 1993 L 1889a STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY P.O. BOX 47600 • Olympia, Washington 98504-7600 • (206)459-6000 December 15, 1993 certify that rtasIed a copy at tel:. Mr. Jim Pearson document ro the omens anJ Jefferson County Planning addresses Osted t#:-:,6011, poo an a receptacle far U.ts�:Py:�:d and Building Department prepaid, p Post Office Box 1220 Status mail at Lace . Washirvip.,a Port Townsend, WA 98368 Alexander and Ventura 1215 Seneca Street ; Seattle, WA 98101 Dear Mr. Pearson and Alexander and Ventura: Re: Jefferson County Permit #SDP92-0015 Alexander and Ventura - Applicant Shoreline Conditional Use Permit #1993-15134 - Conditioned The Department of Ecology has reviewed the above referenced Conditional Use permit to construct a mixed use residential and commercial development including renovation of the west wing of the Port Hadlock Inn and Restaurant, and a recreation center with swimming pool; demolition of the east wing of the old alcohol plant; construction of 44 attached single family residences; construction of four 21-unit condominiums; construction of roads, utilities, and parking areas and designation of open space for public access and protection of critical areas on Port Townsend Bay, North Puget Sound. We concur that the proposal, as conditioned by Jefferson County, meets the intent of the master program and the criteria set forth in WAC 173-14-140 for granting a Conditional Use permit, provided that the following conditions are met: Condition #4 shall be amended to read: In order to avoid significant adverse impacts to wildlife populations and habitat and wetlands functions and values, prior to final approval the applicant shall plant a vegetative buffer on the portion of Open Space Tract B adjacent to the wetland on Open Space Tract A and enhance the existing buffer between the wetland and the proposed structure on Lots 1 thorough 5. The planting shall be conducted in conformance with a detailed plan, prepared by a qualified wildlife biologist or botanist, that has been reviewed and approved by the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department and the Washington State Department of Ecology. Inspection of the revegetation and enhancement shall be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist or botanist after planting and after the first two growing seasons. A report of the results of this inspection shall be provided to the Department of Ecology within one month of the inspection. If replanting is necessary to replace unsuccessful stock, it shall be carried out at the applicants' expense. LOG ITEM two . % -, 1. Mr. Jim Pearson Alexander and Ventura Page 2 December 15, 1993 Condition #12 shall be amended as follows Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall convey an easement on Open Space Tracts A and B and on the intertidal areas of the site in favor of the general public for access, use, and enjoyment for the life of this or any similar project. The home owners association shall retain the right to reasonably regulate the use of those open space tracts and the intertidal areas by establishing rules and regulations, such as thuse to protect landscaping, regulate noise and prevent nuisances, subject to approval by Jefferson County. The proponent shall place informational and directional signs that clearly indicate the location of public access areas and parking spaces dedicated to use by the public. The permit is hereby approved. This approval is given pursuant to requirements of the Shoreline Management Act of 1971. Other federal, state, or local approvals may be required. Construction is not authorized until thirty days from the transmittal date of this approval letter and enclosed permit or until conclusion of any review proceeding initiated within the thirty-day period. If ou have any questions on the above action, please contact me at (24407-7Mor Jo Sohleronne (206) 407-6525. Si , 111 It V Thomas Mark, AICP Supervisor, Management Section Shorelands and Coastal Zone Management Program TM:by COND-CUP.WP Enclosure 12/15/97l SHOPE_R DA E r ?A 4725 " p T C1! 1‘ I e.--/ -Nrrir—envols. . sworerrearenanwrstrolerrnmoronmerem.r.rrmiers. : !Mk-PR! (.71011 -4 ie ths pt_ r / _ - 177 f\ c- - 1-11(1 „- r-none nmber: -,,t) ) AT: Snorelands 6nd Coastal on Managemortt ?togram Washicpaton State Degartment of Ecology _ - g 4 - 0 401 -0:7A-1b 7 wors7-7swele —,a.,-. 2C.1 S.,;AN 401-7250 _ 1A : 17. 1t : - ) st Wiw--13ER OF PAGEL 4\4 •1;1_._:'-f,:t-to TrANSMITTAL PAGE D,FAx.R.,z,uTEpTiciza.93 / I=I 12/15/93 14:26 SHORELANDS 002 4 STATE'Of WASHINGTON DEPARTMEN1 OF ECOLOGY P.O. BOX 47600 * Olympia, Itathington 96504-7600 * (206)439-600u December 15, l'493 traNt , .ne.4:‘7,o a cops, cr: Mr, silm Pearson flo-.7.umit L;ort5 5fl Jefferson County Planning nOQY. porte,go and Building Department prepaici, ;n 3 r optco or Lm;fuct Post Office Box 1220 ertatc tro6i I port Townsand, WA 98368 Alexander and Ventura 1213 Seneca Street . Seattle, WA 98101 ,VEIF,nytrvrr Dear Mr. Pearson and Alexander and Ventura; 4i-ffPr%On CnInity PPrMir Onr9Z-ii01J Alexander and Ventura - Applicant Shoreline Conditional Use Permit #1993-15134 - Conditioned The Department of Ecology has reviewed the above referenced Conditional Use permit to construct a mixed use residential and commercial development including renovation of tho west wing of the Pert Hadlock inn and Restaurant , and a recreation center with swimming pool; demolition of the east wing of the old aiconml plant: construction of 4k attached single tamity residences; const-rot-ton of tour Li-untt condomlniums; construction of roads, utilities, anc, ,:_c 12/15/93 14:27 SHOP'ELANt:'E; 007 Mr. Jim Pearson Alexander and Ventura a tWe December 15, 1993 Condition ##12 shall be amended as follows Prior to final plat approval, the proponent shall convey an easement on Open Space Tr=icrs A And t`s And on the intertidal areas of the site in favor of the general public for access, use, and enjoyment .for the life of this or aiiv similar project. The home owners association shall retain the right to reasonably regulate the use of those open space tracts and the intertidal areas by establishing rules and regulations, such as those to protect landscaping, regulate noise and prevent nui_sancec, subject to approval by Jefferson County. The proponent shall place informational and directional signs that clearly indicate the lucat ou of public access areas And_RAxisingLApao cl c+st- 1.1:c2 344c The er:ir.it is horoby apsrovod. This uYYio `uiis given pursuant to requirements ot the Shoreline Management Act of 1911, Other rederal., state, or local approvals may be required. Construction is not authorized until thirty days from the transmittal date of this approval letter and enoloeed permit or until eottelucion of any review proceeding initiated within the thirty-day period. it ,you have any questions on the above action. please contact me at _- .Vt# = : 255 or Jo o ea.c ne (206) ,407-6-525. ,t ; incmas Mark, Aid' 4ti i .vLs it', t4anatement section S orelends and Coastal Zone tanagement Program 12.'15/97, 14:27 SHOFELqNDS 004 I ' S SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT WASHINGTON STATE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT (ROW 90.5O) pPRmiTTEE: Alexander and Ventura DATE ISSUED 7 October 18, 199 • TYPE (7)F-- ACTON: General TYPE OF USE: Conditional CASE NUMBER: SDP92-0015 APPLICATION DATE: October 26, 1992 PROPOSAL: A mixed use residential and commercial development on the site of the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Marina and adjoining property. The proposal includes the following: 1) Renovation of the west wing of the existing Port Hadlock inn and Restaurant building (west wing of the old alcohol plant) to create 8 residential artist studio condominiums, a restaurant, and a recreation center with swimming pool; 2) Demolition of the east wing of the old alcohol plant which had been previously c011Vtjf led to a hotel; 3) Construction of 44 attached single family residences; 4) Construction of four 21-unit condominiums; 5) Construction of roads, utilities, and parking areas with 213 spaces; and 6) Designation of open space, There is an existing single family residence on the prcipt_‘ga! s; g_ The proposal includes an otfsite community drainfield located south of the Oak day County Ruud. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The proposal site s described as Tax 19, 22, 23, and 24 in Section 1 ; Tax 21 in Sections 1 and 12; and Tax 23 and 24. Lots 2-12, Block 7 of Bay View Addition, and Lots 35-40 of irondale Acre Tracts in Section 12, together with adjoining tidelands, all in Township 29 North, Range 1 West, W.M. WAY AND/OR AOUOC1ATED WETLANDS: Port Toussinsnri Kny SHORELINE OF STATE-WIDE SIGNIFICANCE: No SFLINE DESIGNATION:Urban CONDITIONS: Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken subject to the applicable policies and performance standards of the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program and the following conditions: 1 . In order to ave significant impacts related to storm water runoff, soil erosion, and wetlands functions and values, all clearing, grading, excavation, and construction of -eadways, driveways, parking lots, residences, and utilities shall be consistent with the wading and storm drainage control plan submitted with the proposal and approved by the Jefferson County Public Works Department. 1.2 15 .1.7 I : 0[115 2. In order to avoid significant adverse impacts related to storm water runoff, soir erosion, and wetlands functions and values, ail soils exposed during the course of developreerit activities ahMl be seeded or otherwise revegetated and stabilized to the satisfaction of the Jefferson County Public Works Department. Prior to final plat approval,- the applicant shall provide to the Planning and Building Department eertification to this effect from the Public Works Department. 3. in order to avoid significant adverse impacts related to storm water runoff, soils erosion, and wetlands function% And values. all anniihritinns far reSiduntial uiivin permits shall include a soil erosion and storm water management plan which meets the requirements of the Jefferson County Public Works Deportment. 4. In order to avoid significant adverse impacts to wildlife populations and habitat and wetlands functions and values, prior to final plat approval the applicant shall plant a vegetative buffer on the portion of Open Space Tract B adjacent to the wetland on Open Space Tract A and enhance the existing buifor on Open. Space Tract A. The purpose of the planting shall be to provide a vegetated buffer between the wetland and the proposed structures on Lots 1-5, The planting shall be conducted in conformance with a detailed plan prepared by a qualified wildlife biologist or botanist that has been reviewed and approved by the Jefferson County Planning and Building Dee.,efeewit. Prir tareeermetien of the OA the congultiint hnLl rhntant the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department. inspection of the re-vegetation and enhancement shall be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist or botanist after planting and after the first two growing seasons. If replanting is necessary to replace unsuccessful stock, it shall be carried out at the app ant's expense. in order to avoid significant adverse impacts to wildlife populations and habitat and wetlands functions and values, there shall be no clearing, rernovel at undorctory vegetation or trees, firewood cutting, construction of pathways, or other development on Open Space Tract A and that portion of Upen space Tract 5 that Is wiliui,I hiss vegetated buffer referred to in Mitigation Measure 0'4 of this Mitigated Determination NicosIgnitinance, In order to avoid significant adverse impacts to wildlife populations and habitat and wetlands fume-it:inf.-, and values, prior to final plat approval the applicants shall place an educational and interpretive sign adjacent to me snorona and thE.-: -wetland buffer to alert residents to the fracile nature. of wetlands and Inc important functions that tepee perform. The content of this Sign shall be prepared in consultation with a qUaHfieo piolooist. The SiZe and location of the sign snail be subject to review and aporovai by thejJefferson County Planning and Building Department. 7. In -order to avoid significant adverse impacts to the historic character of the Lower Hadlock Bay Historic Site, prior to the issuance of a buiiding permit for the demolition of the east wing of the alcohol plant, the applicant shall document the east wing of the alcohol plant through photographs and measured drawings. This dociernentatien shall be conducted by an architect or engineer experienced in preservation work a!-.d shall include architec,lural and structural details of both the interior and exterior of 1 building, This documentation shall be provided to the Jefferson County Histcri eeciere Alexander and Ventura 17, 1F, -1=17 14:29 SHOPELLINDS kJ 8. In order to avoid significant adverse impacts to the City of Port Townsend's water distribution system and to the fire fighting capacity of Jefferson County Fire Protection District No. 1, prior to final plat approval the applicant shall submit to the City of Port Townsend Public Works Department for their review and approval a water distribution system plan that has been prepared by a licensed civil engineer In order to avoid significant adverse impacts to the City of Port Townsend's w4idr distribution system and to the fire fighting capacity of Jefferson County Fire Protection District No. 1, prior to final plat approval the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of Port Townsend Public Works Department subject to approval by Jefferson county to fund improvements to the water distribution system adiacent to the proposal site that are commensurate with the impacts related to the 10. The proponent shall comply with all regulations of the State Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58), RCW 217.44,040, RCW 27.53.060 and WAC 25-489 regarding archaeological sites. These regulations prohibit intentional disturbance of archaeological or burial sites without prior approval and provide protocois lor actions folio'vvinci discovery at such sites 1 , if Native American archeological resources are discovered during construction, a qualified archaeologist shall be immediately dispatched to systematically analyze the findings. All construction or excavation on that portion of the project site shall immediately cease and measures shall he taken to prevent further disturbance prior to analysis by a qualified archaeologist: 12. Prior to final plat approval, the proponents shall convey an easement on Open space Tracts A and B and on the intertidal areas of the site in favor of the general public for access, use, and enjoyment for the life of this or any similar project. The home owners association shall retain the right to reasonably regulate the use ot those open s-s-,-)ace tracts and the re rtid.--31 area oy - c 5- rules and regulations, surn cS tho_so to proteut landscapmg, regulate noise, and prevent nui-sances, suoject to ei)prOvai OV n6 pi-op.-3nenr. snail piacH irli-uTITitiii-Oriai and directional signS 'net cleany indicate toe ocation OT puulit; 1 . This permit may be rescinded by the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners or the iv-Vashington State Shorelines Hearings Board upon the finding the,permittee has not with ti-;o coridiVons herein, oursuant. to R C 90,56.14u(8). 2, The permittee is liable for all damages to public and private property arising from violation of any provisions of the permit hereby granted, including the cos'. of restoring the affected area to its condition prior to violation and possible court costs that may ensure from violation, pursuant to RCW 90.58.230. 3. Construction pursuant to this permit will not begin nor is to authorized until thirty (30) days from the date of filing as defined in RCW 90.58. 140(6) and WAC 173-14- 090, or until all review proceedings initiated within thirty days from the date of such filing have terminated, except as provided in RCW 90.58.140(5.a-c). Construction or substantial progress toward construction of the permitted development shall begin within two (2) years from the date of this permit and completion of the permitted development shall be accomplished within five (5) years from the date of this permit. SDF-'92-C.:4015 Aiexervjef and Ventura • 12/15/93 14:30 SHORELANDS 037 4. Nothing in this permit shall excuse the permittee from complying with any other federal, state, or local statuteA„ordinances, or regulations applicable to this project, ne1.45,s45. iv /1 ? / d I //I ,-42" / 7 4\ 6/ / _ Li/ -1 VVOlt, civ nan Jefferson County Board of Comniissloners SOP920015 Alexander -and Ventura Page 4 12/15/97 14:74 SHORELR4DS 008 THIS SECTION IS FOR DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY USE ONLY IN REGARD TO A CONDTQNAL USE PERMIT OR A VARIANCE. Date received by the Department: 1,1 I,98 AcproveO: / . uori,oa This conditional use permit is approved/4gs* by the Department pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW. Development shall be undertaken pursuant to the following additional terms end conditions: k=4 11 1_ 1,-) = I \ r1k Kah6C-.7.1;ti Department Official' Date \sriF sppe 2o I 5.Per St92-0015 Alexanaer aria ventura ',!..`..,","'',,,,.''''•' ••' - ' " , 41 , 4 12/15/93 14:32 SHORELANDS 009 ' L , 4011. . DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Comm-IONS Shoreline Substantial Development/Conditional Use• Permit ii1993-15134-Conditioned Alexanden and Veritrua - Applicant Jefferson County Permit T-OSDP 92-0015 Colitiou 4-.4 shall be amended to read:: In order to avoid signifloate adverse impacts to ',. .lidlife populations and babltat and wetlands functions and values, ptior to final approva,l e-ne applicant shall plant a yegetatLve buffer on the portionof- oph Spaoe Tract B adlacent to the wetland on Open Space Tract A and en.n4i.oc; the existing buffer between the wetland and cue proposed. structure Lots 1 thorough 5 The plantingshall be conducted in conforance Lll alled clan, prepared by a qualified wildlife biologist or boten.l . • has been reviewed and approvedby the jefferson County- Planning au.O Deartent- ArALITsiallizmal._6cate 1!EluaTIsit _IdLi-e,(i .., • Tion of the revegetation and enhancement hall be ii(717-1( ct :..;aa-lied wildlife biologist or botanist aft:er planting ant!, atte t,-t1F:r first two rowinF„ seasons, e...1-7.41aLLAIILOsuir.LLPf _Lill:i.—Llis_tel,; -i-1-11A11-...bo ProYiitE to thRiaR,.0IIZretOt =iaaY wildta....2.W_1021L.Q1,,, ini;p9fz1.1r, It ronJanting is necassary 0 place ull4leuassful 5t . ,-- , if.. shall be carried out at- the appilautsexpense P-12 shall be .:IwiTtilded as folibws I'rfor to final plat approval, the proponent shall. cVD-17 an et-leltc. ...1 ,,---,o Space Tracts A and B andon he intertAdal areas of 1=l7le sle fvor of the general oubi.ja for access, use, and enjoyment tor. the -Ite. of thin or any similar proiect, The home owners asSctloh retain the the. ripjit to reasonably regulate the use of those open pan tracts and the -Iprartidal areas by establishing rules and reguiaLon , such as those to protect landscaping, regulate noise and prevent. nuisances , subiect to _approval by -Jefferson Gounty, Ttle proponent shai, rlace informationaland directional signs thil:: clearly indicate the location of public acess areas and_parkirlg,,,,4211. 1L- o_s4.1 . k O1 i • CO0101• traAnis/ �'•� . -- _ Jefferson County 'hf'(.4. --- " Board of County Commissioners rte, , Ai# !I r::17%, ,,,,--,,' rf"-'d. - G( �+��T '' 4_ s �,� P.O. Box 1220 j 1p^ . `r,,L,..,`;7-.-..111 �L' ' ' .. Port Townsend, Washington 98368 1 4 1 Phone(206)385-9100 • 1-800-831-2678 JEFFERSON COUNTY COURTHOUSE ROBERT H. HINTON, DISTRICT 1 GLEN HUNTINGFORD, DISTRICT 2 NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE PORT TOWNSEND,WASHINGTON RICHARD E.WOJT, DISTRICT 3 RE: Applications by Alexander ) Ventura for "Canoe Cove": ) File: LP08-92 A. A 52 lot residential ) IZ46-93 subdivision on 23.5 acres; ) SDP92-0015 B. A variance from lot ) design standards; ) C. A mixed use residential ) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, and commercial development ) AND APPROVAL conditional use approval; ) D. A variance from minimum ) building setback requirements; ) E. Shoreline Substantial ) Development Conditional Use ) Permit. FINDINGS OF FACT . 1. 1 . The BOard._..of County Commissioners (BOCC) expressly adopts the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the Hearing Examiner and the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management 'Advisory Commission in this matter. 2. The BOCC finds that the intent of SEPA Mitigative Measure No. 8 of the Responsible Official's Final Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance issued June 8, 1993 which required the proponents to negotiate ,a written agreement with Chimacum School District No. 49 has been addressed by1the proponent. A written agreement will be submitted prior to final plat approval. - 3. The Hearing Examiner recommends that preliminary plat approval not be issued until such time as the proponents certify that the City of Port Townsend will provide water for the proposal. By letter dated October 7, 1993 the City of Port Townsend Public Works Department has issued a pre-commitment for water for the proposed 141 residential units. This precommitment will be effective until January 1, 1994. The %. letter further states that the pre-commitment will be honored after that date if the proponents pay tap and other fees that will then be applicable. JEFFERSON COUNTY FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, p(ANNINP Q BUILDING DEPT. AND APPROVAL LocLCaTioe Cove Page 1 OCT 21 1993 # 3( 0 100% Recycled Paper Based on the above Findings, the BOCC enters the following CONCLUSIONS 1 . Based on the above and the entire record herein, including the Hearing Examiner's Recommendation, appropriate provision is made for the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds and all other relevant facts, including sidewalks and other planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school; and the public use and interest will be served by the platting of this subdivision and dedication. Based on the foregoing Findings and Conclusions, the BOCC approves the proposed preliminary plat, the variance from lot design standards, the mixed use residential and commercial development conditional use approval, the variance from minimum building setback requirements, and the shoreline substantial development condi . . - permit. DATED this ) day of October, 1993. jo , 4#1- ri E. Wojt • `-, Glenn Huntingford /If/ Robert A. Hinton C:\Plats\CanoeCov.BOC ti• FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND APPROVAL Canoe Cove Page 2 Department of Public Works o�Q°RT Tommy 5210 KUHN STREET i=. " �� o PORT TOWNSEND, WASHINGTON 9836811 = 206/385-7212 �9��wasN"'��o 206/385-7675 FAX October 07, 1993 Rome Ventura 1215 Seneca St Seattle, WA 98101 Dear Rome: The City of Port Townsend is presently revising its precommitment process. As the City has stated, the proposed project does not have an existing precommitment for any water service at this point in time. The City has established that it will issue pre-commitments for projects that will be effective only until January 01, 1994, at which time the City's new process should be in effect. The new system will require the applicant to move forward with the project, purchase taps and pay the appropriate fees. The pre-commitment issued now will be honored after January 01, 1994 if you pay the tap and other fees which will then be applicable. The City has determined that you are eligible for a pre-commitment. This letter will serve as a pre-commitment for Canoe Cove for 141 Equivalent Residential Units until January 01, 1994. As stated above the pre-commitment will remain valid after January 01, 1994 if the conditions of the new ordinance which will require payment of tap fees, and met at the time. Sincerely, Robert L. Wheeler Public Works Director RLW/cm cc: Jim Pearson JEFFERSON COUNTY PLANNING & BUILDING DEPT. LOG ITEM OCT 12 1993 JEFFERSON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY tM iri 210 MADISON STREET, PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 (206) 385-1003 mAcig ii JJi i i JEFFERSON COUNTY PLANNING & BUILDING DEPT. 7 September 1993 SEP 7 1993 Jefferson County Hearing Examiner Jefferson County Courthouse Port Townsend, WA 98368 Dear Hearing Examiner: At its recent meeting, the Executive Committee of the Board of Trustees of the Jefferson County Historical, Society voted to recommend the following condition for any approval of the Canoe Cove Project in Port Hadlock which could lead to any disturbance of ground: • A qualified archaeologist must be present on the site at all times during which land disturbance including, but not limited to clearing, grading and excavation, occurs. The archaeologist is authorized to suspend any work which appears to result in the disturbance of archaeological or historic resources. The reason for this condition is the extremely sensitive nature of the Lower Hadlock area. The area has been used extensively by Native people, was the location of a Chinese dwelling area and the site of significant historic industrial complexes. The reccent discovery of a Native burial in the vicinity highlights the important character of this location. Minimal testing proved to be insufficient protection. The entire Lower Hadlock area is currently being considered for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Sites and is already listed on the State Register of Historic Sites. We would also request that you review our comments submitted for the SEPA review of this project regarding documentation of the LOG ITEM ao}oaala ureaaeM • eloiaied `�(iaaaouis •Aiunoa uosaailar }o saoanosaa ouo}s!q ENT uo!Toa}oad anoi( aoi pue saanew aseql anon( aoj. nog( •saanTonals }ueld Iouooly Liloq }o uopna1sap )uanaad apew aq Illnn dao}}a Aaana Ieu} agog oT anupuoo am •ssaooaci uoluiowap eqi bulanp anupoo wogs uol1e,uawnoop 1OE Li! pup A}in!Toe uolNowap Aue o} aolad °pew aq lsnw pauuoae pawienb e Aq paaedaad sbulnnap paanseew pue sgdeabo}ogd sepas v •pausliowep aq o} sI ampruTs Aue sbuiplinq weld logooiy s \ \ s ,---",--r" f -- " • " - JEFFERSON COUNTY ,• x ,,, I ' ; - PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT --!,: $ ` ! F; r i 4,k? . Ir of-,- ,.r r X777 r ?« - Y - ,' T, ' . li r P.O. Box 1220 „ce ' s? Port Townsend, Washington 98368 w N ,1 ,IIi t ' air Planning(206)385-9140 +r �; Xt — Y�r; - /'' Building(206)385-9141 :.1� ^ =-"" FAX(206)385-9357 JEFFERSON COUNTY COURTHOUSE Craig Ward, Director JEFFERSON COUNTY SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION SDP92-15 ALEXANDER AND VENTURA A. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION A mixed use residential and commercial development on the site of the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Marina and adjoining property. The proposal includes the following: 1) Renovation of the west wing of the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Restaurant building (west wing of the old alcohol plant) to create 8 residential artist studio condominiums, a restaurant, and a recreation center with swimming pool; 2) Demolition of the east wing of the old alcohol plant which had been previously converted to a hotel; 3) Construction of 41 attached single family residences; 4) Construction of four 21-unit condominiums; 5) Construction of roads, utilities, and parking areas with 213 spaces; and 6) Designation of open space. A total of 133 residential units would be provided. Grading and filling is proposed by the applicant to construct roads, parking areas, residences, and utilities. No fill would be imported onto the site. Instead, the applicant proposes to use as fill material crushed concrete from the demolition of the alcohol plant east wing that had been converted to a hotel. Use of more than 2,000 cubic yards of concrete demolition waste as fill would require a solid waste permit from the Jefferson County Health Department under the requirements of WAC 173-304-100. Approximately 10% of the site would be covered by impervious surfaces due to construction of roads, parking areas, and residences. The applicant has submitted a drainage and erosion control plan which has been reviewed and approved by the Jefferson County Public works Department. Water would be provided by the City of Port Townsend by an existing water distribution system. Depending on the outcome of engineering studies, the City and Jefferson County Fire Protection District #1 may require improvements to the water distribution system in order to provide adequate water flows. The proposal includes an offsite community drainfield located south of the Oak Bay County Road. Legal Description: The proposal site is described as Tax 19, 22, 23, and 24 in Section 1; Tax 21 in Sections 1 and 12; and Tax 23 and 24, Lots 2-12, Block 7 of Bay View Addition, and Lots 35-40 of Irondale Acre Tracts in Section 12, together with adjoining tidelands, all in Township 29 North, Range 1 West, W.M. Project Location: The existing Port Hadlock Inn and Marina at the old alcohol plant site in Port Hadlock on South Port Townsend Bay. LOG JTE i LOG ITEM s3 ,2 ) B. PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT The findings regarding this permit application have been proposed by the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department staff for consideration by the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Advisory Commission and the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners. Any of these findings may be adopted, rejected, or modified or additional findings may be adopted by the Shoreline Commission or the Board of Commissioners based on testimony or evidence presented during the course of review. SITE CONDITIONS 1. According to the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Soil Survey of Jefferson County, soils on the site are Hoypus gravelly loamy sand with slopes from 0-15%. These soils have slow to medium water runnoff and a slight to moderate hazard of erosion. 2. The upland portions of the site are level to rolling. There is a steep bank approximately 50' high adjacent to the shoreline on the easterly portion of the property. No development activities are proposed for within 50 feet of the top of the bluff. 3. The proposal site was developed in 1911 to create an industrial facility. This included extensive grading and filling. 4. The proposal site is a portion of the Lower Hadlock Bay Historic Site. It is on the State Register of Historic Sites and is being considered for designation as a component of the Lower Hadlock Bay National Historic District. The historic use of the site includes use by Native Americans, Europeans, and Chinese laborers during the early development of Port Hadlock. The Port Hadlock area was used intensively by Native Americans into historic times. The site was disturbed in the early part of this century during the construction of the alcohol plant. A review of the extensive archeological record and inspection of the site indicate that there is only two areas which are likely to contain Native American archeological resources. One is the beach berm adjacent to the wetland on Open Space Tract A. The other is adjacent to the shoreline on Open Space Tract B. The potential resources on Tract B are covered by approximately four feet of fill. No development is proposed for these areas. Environmental review determined that the proposal would not result in a significant impact to archeological or historic resources. 5. There are no perennial streams on the property. There is an emergent estuarine and palustrine wetland approximately 1.3 acres in size on Open Space Tract A on the northwest corner of the proposal site adjoining the shoreline. Wildlife use of this wetland is limited due to its small size and existing disturbances from the resort. There is an existing vegetated buffer between the wetland and the proposed residences on Lots 1-4. The area easterly of the wetland is vegetated with blackberries and grasses. Environmental review determined that the proposal would not result in a significant impact to this wetland provided that there was compliance with the drainage and erosion control plan and provided there was enhancement of the buffer area. 6. Trees have been cleared from most of the site with the exception of the uplands on Open Space Tract A which are characterized by mixed deciduous and coniferous trees and shrubs and Open Space Tract E which has scattered conifers along the top of the shoreline bluff. The proposal does not include clearing these areas. Vegetation on the remainder of the property is predominantly grasses. 2 7. Water is supplied to the site by the City of Port Townsend. Environmental review determined that the proposal would not result in a significant impact to water supplies. It also determined that the proposal would not result in a significant impact to the water distribution system provided that there was improvements were made based on an engineered water distribution plan. EXISTING USES 1. The site currently contains a resort consisting of a hotel, restaurant, parking lots, and marina. The hotel and restaurant occupy the converted alcohol plant buildings. These are concrete structures that were built in 1911 to produce alcohol from sawdust. There was extensive interior and exterior modifications of these structures during their conversion. Development of the resort was authorized under Jefferson County Shoreline Permits 30-78, 21-82, and 21-83. 2. Development of 49 condominium units and related roads and utilities on the easterly portion of the site was previously authorized under Jefferson County Shoreline Permit 21-83. This development was only partially completed prior to the expiration of Permit 21-83. Development included grading and construction of utilities and one residence. 2. The adjoining area to the south is platted in urban densities, however, there are only three residences immediately adjoining the proposal site. The area to the east is platted and developed in urban and suburban densities with small lots adjoining the shoreline. The area to the west is not platted. 3. There are existing views of Port Townsend Bay from the Alcohol Loop Road and the uplands south of the site. Environmental review determined that the proposal would not result in a significant impact to views. 4. The site is accessed by the Flagler Road (SR 1 16) and Alcohol Loop Road. Environmental review of the proposal determined that the existing road system is adequate to handle traffic that would be generated by the development. 5. The marina was extensively damaged in a severe storm in December 1991 . Most of the floats and slips have not been replaced. OTHER PERMITS 1. Jefferson County Subdivision and Zoning approval, Road standard variance, and building permits 2. Washington Department of Fisheries Hydraulic Project Approval for a storm water management plan. NOTICES 1. Notice of application was made by publishing legal notices in the November 4 and 11, 1992 editions of the Port Townsend-Jefferson County Leader, posting the site, and notifying by mail immediately adjacent property owners as required by Master Program Section 6.402 Public Notice. 2. Notice of the public hearing before the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Advisory Commission on June 16, 1993 was made by publishing a legal notice in the June 2, 1993 edition of the Port Townsend-Jefferson County Leader as required by Master Program Section 6.402 Public Notice. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT REVIEW The proposal has been reviewed in accordance with the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) (WAC 197-11) by Jefferson County as lead agency. A preliminary mitigated determination of nonsignificance was issued on January 13, 1993. After consideration of comments, a final modified mitigated determination of nonsignificance was issued on June 8, 1993. The determination states that the anticipated environmental impacts have been adequately addressed and that the preparation of an environmental impact statement is not necessary. The proposal is subject to the following mitigation measures that are intended to avoid impacts identified during SEPA review: 3 1 . In order to avoid significant impacts related to storm water runoff, soil erosion, and wetlands functions and values, all clearing, grading, excavation, and construction of roadways, driveways, parking lots, residences, and utilities shall be consistent with the grading and storm drainage control plan submitted with the proposal and approved by the Jefferson County Public Works Department. (SDP Condition) 2. In order to avoid significant adverse impacts related to storm water runoff, soil erosion, and wetlands functions and values, all soils exposed during the course of development activities shall be seeded or otherwise revegetated and stabilized to the satisfaction of the Jefferson County Public Works Department. Prior to final plat approval, the applicant shall provide to the Planning and Building Department certification to this effect from the Public Works Department. (SDP, Plat Condition) 3. In order to avoid significant adverse impacts related to storm water runoff, soils erosion, and wetlands functions and values, all applications for residential building permits shall include a soil erosion and storm water management plan which meets the requirements of the Jefferson County Public Works Department. (SDP Condition) 4. In order to avoid significant adverse impacts to wildlife populations and habitat and wetlands functions and values, prior to final plat approval the applicant shall plant a vegetative buffer on the portion of Open Space Tract B adjacent to the wetland on Open Space Tract A and enhance the existing buffer on Open Space Tract A. The purpose of the planting shall be to provide a vegetated buffer between the wetland and the proposed structures on Lots 1-5. The planting shall be conducted in conformance with a detailed plan prepared by a qualified wildlife biologist or botanist that has been reviewed and approved by the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department. Prior to preparation of the plan the consultant shall contact the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department. Inspection of the revegetation and enhancement shall be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist or botanist after planting and after the first two growing seasons. If replanting is necessary to replace unsuccessful stock, it shall be carried out at the applicant's expense. (SDP Condition) 5. In order to avoid significant adverse impacts to wildlife populations and habitat and wetlands functions and values, there shall be no clearing, removal of understory vegetation or trees, firewood cutting, construction of pathways, or other development on Open Space Tract A and that portion of Open Space Tract B that is within the vegetated buffer referred to in Mitigation Measure #4 of this Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance. (SDP Condition) 6. In order to avoid significant adverse impacts to wildlife populations and habitat and wetlands functions and values, prior to final plat approval the applicants shall place an educational and interpretive sign adjacent to the shoreline and the wetland buffer to alert residents to the fragile nature of wetlands and the important functions that they perform. The content of this sign shall be prepared in consultation with a qualified biologist. The size and location of the sign shall be subject to review and approval by the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department. (SDP, Plat Condition) 7. In order to avoid significant adverse impacts to the historic character of the Lower Hadlock Bay Historic Site, prior to the issuance of a building permit for the demolition of the east wing of the alcohol plant, the applicant shall document the east wing of the alcohol plant through photographs and measured drawings. This documentation shall be conducted by an architect or engineer experienced in preservation work and shall include architectural and structural details of both the interior and exterior of the building. This documentation shall be provided to the Jefferson County Historical Society. (SDP Condition) 4 8. In order to avoid significant adverse impacts to the Chimacum School District's capacity to provide educational services and to ensure that the District can make appropriate provision for school facilities, prior to final plat approval the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the Chimacum School District subject to approval by Jefferson County to provide mitigation that is comensurate with the impacts related to the proposal. Said mitigation may either be to provide facilities for the use of the District or to pay to the District a sum to be agreed upon by the applicant and the District. (Plat) 9. In order to avoid significant adverse impacts to the City of Port Townsend's water distribution system and to the fire fighting capacity of Jefferson County Fire Protection District No. 1, prior to final plat approval the applicant shall submit to the City of Port Townsend Public Works Department for their review and approval a water distribution system plan that has been prepared by a licensed civil engineer. (SDP, Plat Condition) 10. In order to avoid significant adverse impacts to the City of Port Townsend's water distribution system and to the fire fighting capacity of Jefferson County Fire Protection District No. 1, prior to final plat approval the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of Port Townsend Public Works Department subject to approval by Jefferson county to fund improvements to the water distribution system adjacent to the proposal site that are commensurate with the impacts related to the proposal. (SDP, Plat Condition) SITE INSPECTION Inspections of the site was made on February 10, 1993 by a representative of the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department. A video tape of the site was made at that time. C. WRITTEN TESTIMONY Washington Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation stated that the proposal site is a portion of the area nominated for the National Register of Historic Places. They urged the developer to explore alternatives to demolition of the east wing of the alcohol plant. They stated that they believed that the manufacturing site was larger than the two existing structures. Other componennts may be below ground. An assessment should be made by a historical archeologist. Washington Department of Wildlife stated that the proposal will require a Hydraulic Project Approval; there is an eagle perch tree westerly of the wetland area on the westerly portion of the site; the wetland provides high quality wildlife habitat; the buffer easterly of the wetland could be reduced in width if it is enhanced. Jefferson County Health Department stated that the use of waste from the demolition of the alcohol plant for fill would require a solid waste permit from Jefferson County if it exceeds 2,000 cubic yards. Jefferson County Historical Society stated that they regret the loss of the structure proposed for demolition. Its current listing on the State Register of Historic Structures and review as part of a National Register designation make its protection, if at all possible, of paramount consideration. SEPA mitigation measure #7 should be revised to state that the documentation of the wing of the alcohol plant proposed for demolition should be conducted by an architect or engineer experienced in preservation work and that it include architectural and structural details of both the interior and exterior of the building. Port Townsend Public Works Department stated that the proposal would have an impact on 5 water supplies and the water distribution system. Jeff Johnson, an adjoining property owner, wrote regarding traffic concerns. Jeanne Sisneros, an adjoining property owner, wrote regarding view impacts and drainage problems. E. Zahn stated that there should be restoration of degraded shorelines. D. APPLICABLE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES 1 . The Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program requires that a shoreline substantial development permit be issued by Jefferson County for development of the proposal. The following sections of the program apply in the review of the proposal: 1.20 Purposes; 4.105 Urban; 4.201 Primary Uses; 4.402 Secondary Uses; 4.203 Conditional Uses; 4.40 Classification Table; 5.50 Commercial Development; 5.100 Landfills; 5.140 Parking Facilities; 5.160 Residential Development; 5.170 Scientific and Educational Facilities; 5.190 Transportation Facilities; 5.20 Utilities. 2. The proposal has been administratively classified as follows by criteria established in the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program: * Primary Uses in the Urban Designation: 5.50 Commercial Development (Water- enjoyment); 5.170 Scientific and Educational Facilities; 5.190 Transportation Facilities; 5.20 Utilities * Secondary Uses in the Urban Designation: 5.140 Parking Facilities; * Conditional Uses in the Urban Designation: 5.160 Residential Development (as per Section 4.105 Urban, Policy #1 and Performance Standard #1). 3. Master Program Section 4.105 Urban Designation states as follows: * Policy #1 and Performance Standards #1-3 state that development in urban areas should be managed to enhance and maintain the shoreline for a variety of urban uses with preference for water-oriented uses; nonwater-oriented uses may be authorized provided that they make provision for the public's continued and enhanced access to and enjoyment of the shoreline through measures that are commensurate with the degree of impact caused by the development; public access shall be permanent, dedicated, and available for the public at the time of occupancy; * There should be efficient utilization of urban areas in order to avoid expansion into nonurban areas; * There should be physical and visual shoreline access; * Parking facilities should be landscaped to screen them from the shoreline and adjacent properties; * No new developments shall be approved with a height more than 35' above average grade level that would obstruct the view of a substantial number of residences; * Storm water runoff shall not be increased in rate nor decreased in quality from pre- project conditions. 4. Master Program Section 5.50 Commercial Development states that: le* Priority should be given for water-oriented uses; nonwater-oriented uses may be authorized provided that they make provision for the public's continued and enhanced access to and enjoyment of the shoreline through measures that are commensurate with the degree of impact caused by the development; public access shall be permanent, dedicated, and available for the public at the time of occupancy; V* Parking facilities should be located inland of the proposed use, designed to accomodate expected activity, and ensure that storm water runoff does not pollute adjacent development; * New commercial developments should be located adjacent to existing developments; 6 * Commercial developments shall be located a minimum of 15' from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM); * No new developments shall be approved with a height more than 35' above average grade level that would obstruct the view of a substantial number of residences. 5. Master Program Section 5.100 Landfills states that landfills should palced so as not to result in erosion or damage to water quality. It sets forth requirements for information that applicants must provide regarding source and quality of fill and construction methods. 6. Master Program Section 5.140 Parking Facilities states that parking facilities should be located away from the water's edge, have provision to control storm water runoff, and be adequate to serve the projected level of demand; security lighting should not result in glare on adjacent properties. 7. Master Program Section 5.160 Residential Development states that residential development should: * Be designed at a level of density that is compatible with the site; * Protect water and shoreline aesthetics; Preserve shoreline vegetation and control erosion during construction; * Provide adequate water and sewage disposal facilities; * Avoid geologically hazardous areas; * Maintain waterfront areas for common use; * Be designed and located so as not to significantly block views of adjacent residences; * Meet residential setbacks of at least 30' back from the banktop or one foot back from the banktop for each foot of bank height which ever is greater on property with banks more than 10' in height; * Limit residential structures to 35' in height. Master Program Section 5.170 Scientific and Educational Facilities states that `(1 developers should comply with all regulations regarding archaeological sites which (11111(1"/(4 prohibit intentional disturbance of archaeological or burial sites without prior approval and provide protocols for actions following discovery of such sites. J3. Master Program Section 5.190 Transportation Facilities states that roads should be constructed in such a manner and employ storm water management facilities so that erosion, slope instability, sedimentation, and water quality degradation do not occur. \- 10. Master Program Section 5.20 Utilities states that utilities should be placed underground where feasible. 11 The proposed shoreline substantial development permit application is subject to the following review criteria: a. Primary Use: Primary uses are presumed to be generally consistent with the policies and definition vw of the shoreline designation where they are proposed. Projects are reviewed for BJP consistency with the specific policies and performance standards specified for the particular type of development being reviewed. b. Secondary Uses: Secondary uses are those uses that have not been judged to be preferred within a particular shoreline environmental designation. Applicants for shoreline substantial development permits for secondary uses will have the burden of proof to demonstrate that: 1. The proposal will not be contrary to the general intent of the Shoreline Management Act, nor shall it be contrary to the goals, policies, and performance standards of the Master Program. 2. The proposed project will not materially interfere with the public use of public lands and waters or the private use of adjacent private lands. 3. The proposed project will not cause unnecessary adverse effects on the environment or other properties and will be compatible with other permitted uses in the area. 7 c. Conditional Uses Conditional uses are those judged to be the least preferred within a particular shoreline environmental designation. Applicants for shoreline substantial development permits for conditional uses will have the burden of proof to demonstrate that: 1. The proposed use is consistent with the policies of the Shoreline Management Act and the policies of the Master Program. 2. The proposed use will not interfere with the normal public use of public shorelines. 3. The proposed use of the site and design of the project is compatible with other permitted uses within the area. 4. The proposed use will cause no unreasonable adverse effects to the shoreline environment in which it is to be located. 5. The public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effect. In those limited instances where a conditional use is proposed, consideration shall be given to the cumulative impact of additional requests for similar actions in the area. E. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Issuance of a shoreline substantial development permit for the proposed project requires compliance with the Washington State Shoreline Management Act and the applicable purposes, policies and performance standards of the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program. In addition to the applicable conditions of the Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance issued for the proposal, Jefferson County Planning and Building Department staff recommend consideration of the following conditions which are intended to ensure compliance with the Shoreline Act and the Master Program: 1. The proponent shall comply with all regulations of the State Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58), RCW 217.44.040, RCW 27.53.060 and WAC 25-489 regarding archaeological sites. These regulations prohibit intentional disturbance of archaeological or burial sites without prior approval and provide protocols for actions following discovery of such sites. 2. If Native American archeological resources are discovered during construction, a qualified archaeologist shall be immediately dispatched to systematically analyze the findings. All construction or excavation on that portion of the project site shall immediately cease and measures shall be taken to prevent further disturbance prior to analysis by a qualified archaeologist. 3. Prior to final plat approval, the proponents shall convey an easement on Open Space Tracts A and B and on the intertidal areas of the site in favor of the general public for access, use, and enjoyment for the life of this or any similar project. The home owners association shall retain the right to reasonably regulate the use of those open space tracts and the intertidal area by establishing rules and regulations, such as those to protect lanscaping, regulate noise, and prevent nuisances, subject to approval by Jefferson County. The proponent shall place informational and directional signs that clearly indicate the location of public access areas. F. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The decision to issue or deny an application for a shoreline substantial development permit should be based on the proposal's consistency with the Shoreline Management Act and the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program. If the Shoreline Management Advisory Commission recommends approval of the application and if Board of County Commissioners decides to issue a permit for the proposal, the Planning and Building Department recommends the adoption of the following conclusions: 1. The conditions placed on this shoreline substantial development permit are required in order to achieve compliance with the Washington State Shoreline Management Act and the applicable purposes, policies, and performance standards of the Jefferson- 8 Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program. 2. The proposal as conditioned is consistent with the purposes and goals of the Shoreline Management Act and the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program. 3. The proposal as conditioned is consistent with Shoreline Master Program Section 4.105 Urban Designation. 4. The proposal as conditioned meets the approval criteria for primary uses as set forth in Shoreline Master Program Sections 4.201 Primary Uses, 4.202 Secondary Uses, and Section 4.203 Conditional Uses as appropriate. 5. The proposal as conditioned is consistent with Shoreline Master Program Sections 5.50 Commercial Development; 5.100 Landfills; 5.140 Parking Facilities; 5.160 Residential Development; 5.170 Scientific and Educational Facilities; 5.190 Transportation Facilities; 5.20 Utilities. C:\SDP\SDP92015.RPT 9 • SHORELINE COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Advisory Commission considered the proposal on June 16, 1993. Associate Planner Jim Pearson presented the staff report, discussed the proposal, and answered questions from the Commission. He noted that there were issues involving water supply by the City of Port Townsend and conditional use for residential development in urban shoreline designations. Rome Ventura, project proponent, discussed the proposal and answered questions from the Commission. The hearing was opened to public testimony. Jim Engle of the City of Port Townsend Public Works Department stated that the water commitment had expired. The City was unsure whether it had sufficient water to supply the project. He discussed water issues with the Commission. Patti Sullivan spoke regarding whether the proposal was a primary or secondary use. She also questioned whether it was appropriate for the Commission to be conducting a hearing when the title to the property was in question. Jim Pearson stated that application for the proposal had been made under the previous ownership by Phil Broms. He stated that he had spoken with Ray Hanson, the owner, and he had authorized the County to process the application. Bernie Arthur stated that he thought that high density housing should not be a conditional use in the urban designation. Jeanne Sisneros, adjacent property owner, stated that her view would be eliminated by the proposed condominiums. She was also concerned about drainage issues. The public testimony portion of the hearing was closed. Jim Pearson noted for the record that the proposal was being reviewed under the existing Master Program that had Men adopted in 1989 and not under the amendments that had been rescinded by the Board of Commissioners. The existing Master Program Urban Policy makes residential development and other nonwater-oriented uses conditional uses in the urban designation. The Commission discussed the issues of public access, demolition of the east wing of the old alcohol plant, storm water runoff, wildlife, adequacy of the sewage system, parking, and use of the site by Native Americans. The Commission discussed possible revisions to the recommended permit conditions. It was moved and seconded to adopt the staff report with the recommended conditions and conclusions of law and to recommend issuance of the shoreline substantial development conditional use permit by the Board of Commissioners. The motion carried. The Commission unanimously adopted the proposed findings and recommended approval of the application with the revised conditions. C:\SDP\SDP92015.RPT 10 mai we yr bHUHELINE COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL Affidavit of Publication DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION SDP92.0015 RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, STATE OF WASHINGTON) AND RECREATIONAL SS DEVELOPMENT COUNTY OF JEFFERSON) EXISTING PORT HADLOCK INN AND MARINA SITE FRANK W.GARRED,being sworn,says he is the publisher ALEXANDER AND VENTURA, of the Port Townsend Jefferson County Leader, a weekly APPLICANTS newspaper which has been established, published in the NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a English language and circulated continuously as a weekly public hearing will be held by the newspaper in the town of PortTownsend in said County and State, and for general circulation in said county for more Jefferson Port Townsend Shoreline than six(6)months prior to the date of the first publication Management Advisory Commission to of the Notice hereto attached,and that the said PortTownsend review,take testimony on,and make a Jefferson County Leader was on the 27th day of June 1941 recommendation on an application by Alexander and Ventura for a shoreline approved as a legal newspaper by the Superior Court of said substantial development permit. Jefferson County and that annexed is a true copy of the The hearing will be held or Wednesday, June 16, 1993, at 7:0( Public Hearing PM in the Superior Court Room nf thF SDP 9 2-0 015 Jefferson County Courthouse, 1820 Residential, Commercial and Jefferson Street,PortTownsend,WA. Recreational development Information on the proposal is available from the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department(PO Existing Port Hadlock Inn and Box 1220,Port Townsend,Washington Marina Site 98368; (206)385-9140). Alexander and Ventura, appli- THE PROPOSAL is fora mixed use cants residential, recreational, and commercial development on the site of the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Marina and adjoining property. The proposal includes the following: 1) Renovation of the west wing of as it appeared in the regular and entire issue of said paper the existing Port Hadlock Inn and itself not in a supplement thereof for a period of Restaurant building(west wing of the old alcohol plant)to create 8 residential one consecutive weeks,beginning on the 2nd day of June ,19 93 ,andendingontbe artist studio condominiums, a restaurant, and a recreation center 2nd day of June ,19 9 3 ,and with swimming pool; that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscrib- 2)Demolition of the east wing of the ers during all of this period. That the full amount of old alcohol plant; 3)Construction of 41 attached single $ 58 . 62 has been paid in full,at the rate of$7.30 family residences; ($6.70 for legal notices received electronic. ly,modem or 4) Construction of four 21-unit disk)per column in . • each insertion. condominiums; 5) Construction of roads, utilities, , f- '60 I and parking areas and 6) Designation of open space. A Publisher total of 133 residential units would be Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2nd day of provided. June , 19 93_. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The A 1/ proposal site is described as Tax 19, ' �'/ 22, 23, and 24 in Section 1; Tax 21 in � � " `" �� ��AI i• Notary Public irr' d for the State of Washington, Sections 1 and 12;and Tax 23 and 24, residing at Port Hadlock. Lots2-12,Block 7 of Bay ViewAddition, Aand Lots 35-40 of Irondale Acre Tracts k in Section 12, together with adjoining tidelands, all in Township 29 North. Range 1 West. W.M. 44A 6-2 • �1 .... .I _ . _ i._ . N 8 m HUH r lir illg ll; ir ilii , S !f iD ;. 0 ,1 MOOM > 0It Ill i. t I IIili II1 A f zo i I: 1 !f 111 ri n N N N N js y 1 1 1! ' fli ;/ i i R'4 1 M- A V8 i i ill 1 1 i Eil 114-'-'4°117 0.- - w:, ii * 0 • ' t; i ...—±:il i a Ili 1 ..i ---E—_2=H[L. QA \ , itt��i d fl ,A Ptl yg v N GA o - S p� 1 AIM! y— — \ ,:_,) .1 9 1 1 21 )18 ce)3. i 1 4 A k ;A , \ liPlIni; 11' �" r._ il \--.-47;z:74.6- �qcs:. Xii - �yi to • 1 Unnswu t eo au Milos)vu __�- p • I - rn or II 54 i 1 11 $ ALCOHOL Li+' 'OAD ' Ih ri ren I> ti .4 - — u 1e 4 • a IA1 1 ;A I` F . - g 13 ri rn 71 VV-i:::: cc �4 Ori O ___,gf,_QRQE_Ii Is 17 li 1- 1 ,-.%r is... ....404 .1 Til ti 21V 41 a C) !. ,‘„ki 1!. % 1 r - .,----___.....m., tiLib..., . 1 iF A 4 rill 444_re, i.". :411ii3O ‘ 21' '''''.• 0*._ 24', \ 1E 0 j _ ‘. ii -4'2- , ` `rte , :147\. r k(I11111 1 IIIIIIIG , } ¢ M "',r. 1110 �l I I I I I I I m11111411111/ I l l l 1 1 1 rr �4!r ' JIIIIIIIIIIII (I (L �}Jill,11 • _ t., 44' • .•, ,^ `L► �1� �\ ® IIlIIIIIIiIIl I1II Y/ I ,\ 44 - `, .� �$ < ,,� �" ~` s 1.1 lair `.• -'•* Nom, A Si tv ci 1!- :. 0 4 . :57 ,,.., C,,,,, . VI --'ICI' -- st, I i litiOA , eAk, \ •1 1,4 IPliwiL I-1 r_ 5.,,,:.— -----A.4:.„, 0, /. #,-,34-..,'\\.\\.: .t— iPs • \ '\\. ,, zi_s.,- _ coil ..,. �' Fir • p� r,\ j 0? '- A\ t i V / G ' ./ \\�'�";-, / \ �. �� •\ ly -2• 1$4.'.1 ' 11 ! t 1 f.,..,,. 4 4 ....i 4 , op \ Alr —0') , ,i0,44t. 7‘4%1 10,ar kr V • . i,(.__, i i,' to ��__ ' 01L IpillcI:: AT PORT HADLOCK, °`°°"m ` Ng '''''"*LD—'" ,( Alexander Idol Ventura CANOE COVE Ej .01,4,72.;"'" dnr JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON. pYMNLIe.x Ho or LR 4rHvws— sr c. �.. .--. ...n Ge O'er a..,.. /..tUt..6o.tl,uInb ;tato C eWNiATMES • U-L4aH(LLN.adl .rfqI 0yP—a NPKGaNiuXA Y p* r u'7 ``ggFF �1 ( 1..1)e'' •y • 3 z 1 t,41 _t t�r li rl'� 1I� ,1,4“1,4 e �,,R CD O • 1.0‘:'; x... I I�wir 1,1 e :• 1,4111:1.1111:4th1 111:1yl •�?� r.yl.• •.a. .t.:,..,,,,,,,,42,;.:: 1 I i,I'i 11400.11:4:11410-- k�il1llf�'_�i', , it*tk'r'.k: Q' l .S f:-�L lf.�-PIi77'J i7VeI�p pp { r N —C t., •N:y esj+ -•4ha r'4t 5 (D t d x L= ilk; 71313��II7 i 11�I�Illt sl l�+ QJ -0 z*w °II � •1: t,,w0 7 ,7-1. n 1 It_',4 °'71 e'f r ',17 s !G4�rv4�1 fll Ill • evx"« '` `"b'r. r �. 3; i 7lid I u;G�fe� x ": 1 U Js'r°n �+( v 7� y 1 I11111_III I I ,ii,_ 77 r s� 7p D ? • i( :,i:::,,-.:.., . ,'Iiy6 a� •1 1 -:c i. '.I ,7g�1 '},f ei, Ile ,1 1 „ 1 Lig I• ( 3 elf I Y a Cr' I' T.' II _I,'. �'II M;' I�����I ili`'s Siy�ra' � of fe5N `9 ) "}' ten* A. int.'s r"A'"'1 a II ° 1, ,,,_:44,60.4„,,.... ,31.4c*.14,_,..?.f 'fir'i -1 ,, N !„ .: 0. a:->k eysii;1'1I11rIkIIG7ol1 1i P4,!- 1S z3,i,,?,', ��tr,t. ilir '',,f f�x 5„t I ,sv I ,1111 .III1l71iI pD7 '?e1I n, 's _ 4* + '.i” ui{ls�7 $14..+0...i..14.1,1,4,,...!...;1dtr1"-f ��m I��i 41e.,1 111 •0:4,,t 'AL O } i file! 41111'04D ,-ga*,: p �', 1 1, iiiii. ev i 7 n.. na 1 sie, aea4�stldeIMII` st �� er 1r U'f�'` n ar,t , ..—\ �e � ��a 7 jlt A i .w lw n...P.Pt1 ..•11, ----�. jiJJj Is N I $rl • I -r i ' i [ 111 2't1' �k �i k�11' g` r j1�'lI''�'1 11 .3 Clip:; � �. ICI IILL� � i'S�L:' 7{7q4,lei,IIIIII" r' 7 3�.i7 , _' y,_,z '� Fe �ritll 1 IY� I��vvRe 4 A140, 111t1 lei' !rfY Z -.3 4� f° 11 .'1,i,is :te,41.„64161...,,,,�!_'� 1:', ar _\ 1 II 4a' jir 7 7l7 O 7.6 r ....-grate* '•"� .,1 I1,, -,,--, si! ! 'thR s r+ r Fri i 1t i1Y.rMwa1111 '�I'� 1•�`' "1.124411-410ee1L41111$1'It �l. t�? IV t t .s.igi, . , ,,,, .. _ ' I I �� j" •_-1 1lI,` 1;IIIIIIII p t11 slli • .,,,,-11:,f, ]> E....„ I_ 1I) I'� a• ,700. ries `' r �Y � f 7,I.X.I '4f* N O • , 4 , , e 1 d, 'i, .11.1,!1„: -,,.11,111,1.Y 1, L „liana.Ie�e`n�erl �. }} i ii e O �. ( . t 7 s N1 i7 e!1 11 x.; ,.'A" '�,,,,,,,,...,,„,.,„.,„„,,,,„,i,„, t'} e t ` a1e,.�IIIi���I�IIIIlUikll(I� 31',•illlllli 7 I''i�liltlu �' O 1 1 1 � i�r i .-v,` r--'::.,:c•-•• i.1111i d ill /l ;l't �I I - tt a, ! $ '� c :11'111 II ,24.;-;,:.41111., pi '] ii.-I.A,-:-Tir, P�' h. s % r. x ,:I I 1 a 1011111 i1=11 / 1 _- 1 I, *. t iya:r Nzxy' I I j11'17311 ,'I 1'1i "ae- 11,1,,k jam''a;- t �' ' 'L r - u � it i,lI ie e7ilr if }te'i-'it1 c-r41, npfu • O tt,` 3t�1� "�"' 'e . ) I I1I' ' .. jyi t t+ q '%.' ;'5140#41. .. � �4„#�b' �1 4.1111,, e�� - e +I n r,l r1 a y', l0 r,�e ;y � I+i 1311111101:111.1'.ll7' ''r. : 1 ttpau h fa eos�•+• a 7l,ef , 4N 1 s s y1 bte at<M I ems- I 1:1411.1.4111111.:11 t Ilell 11ee 7 f 11 +. '' ' " '„ fah x btfinx 4 t ,J •y`�4,e,, *.-,- 1 T 4,471.5e1; � .::;,.<x NtYu:u..mVroee.YSiY.ua¢ulinn...n.a aJL,�wr.�•,Ii:V'.• • • • ..9e,whhF a LPG, Cz. A'S. fA . • 111 full . y'i ** '„ i IV CO 7ON ' .:1 Ill Ill i.., �up1 1-,, '4,�i2� � 70 U , ` It. 'wwyIt ,n Vt...!' o , , 41 �, 1 O z t. it /11l�1►al IIi t. (I1f11 ��•7 O 9. Ill � 7,57.7...a �( I I . Il��r 0 s }a F ai-31:11:1 �e IIII I� 70 D is_r.r I Z ' d;7.r '''' I li %A� ' .'j { I)Y •ll�� Illi i ,, O • `t.V 4t �-- ] yy:ani r JAM. ,,'' ���A-ani. a d111 1 b o a. Vi•a, I'- - ,., . Ri illiik ar 4 -i 11 2IS ' "�';�Ilglllllll�lll -...• 11 Ill I 1I-W-4, 9i I } III ,. yai 11 "rte � �' '' gn� ���1tlllI�II���l111 ) $ .. sl,,ij').ila 7 ;`a 'r-,' .„„ %/ ,i�EYi I: � e°:.�,� RI� ,,r: #4.1.41)11!,:'„,,..,;„1,, §tfi wy ,{ ���I k ,wF tor I II I ,; (i i.I l 11 1•' II I� I , I '1 (� iQ111U 1' - V.' Ht-�11 II sIn �'i•' 3 %�9 i R 1 1� O - /120=1/___ , ,i 1 I l',r sl ,14,',1%;;M;71,,,` ..'..,. y r��ap .' � � oil L:'j� ie, -( Ll Bu ! fi 1 ..2n !�1I t 1 r�*t W e., a'lI I 1 III I t-�r i -.,,,,,,111111,71111101,� ;s 11111;�it I. 4411� ' l�i4ff1i177--- I f (a -, +' r - 1 �, I I < t -.�I`4 fly1F�. _a�ri'+ i\u'�1V �t ,,r— I, 01 N .!ti4 try;�i�' 1 .. ice'I1 111 1f� I,�t�f � f A.,tea' s I •�.� qpI •f{4j ' ,Stir 1,Jf�.a4 a '1/,t-,P'&111%11 rS;'g,y-,# SPI ` /��1�71a. / «�t> J�I�„ '' �, r, 1 ! x e i ii / t,P-.t ♦ + ill L! S ,'* :,:,-,,,f,„,. jtJx I JY'tv- r r '3R,,ti4. /7, Lnf!k. ,..YYf�b• t. ' 17.;:4tjtli(I I � 1p let r leP ., . a yr .,a/ -4 �f"171 i, k! N A 11 1 4 - + N N 2 , liv 1 ill li 1115g f[rffr ' ig lifgii- 5 o OC I'M p . it qui 8 CI "2 is 01 I! OA II :I II ril° ril AK • If ‘t FP ; Il 1 _.1 ;� _ � 1N I ,I•o 1 ,, if 1 pf 1.1 /ill '. I tp - __c. ,NNNNsi •1 1 4 ill rI Z1� ti ! t _406 ilo- MI illi 1 i J E I`— 04 4 _Xi $ L:11117 ♦♦ yy \ nli*{' r El n ' O N NN P 4 TA S gi 4 111 1011.414. > v 1 a illi .. /) IIII ''13ji \ ��7I Y \� it +w /+ ;:, to'' (3fTNSNNnw eD prld iru ...-1,..., .9Ai ` ,1 •j� '� al fi 1 r � ALCOHOL_L _ OAD • � d 14� I fl c. K IA . ��a Slitig: I \I'll: 13 ‘0 a Ig \14 N a il 1 cn ' m Lr- Itil : \ • k � Eq Ip iii °„ . F .7 EORGE S 4 / lig , ' :� ';�,• ' r 11,4.›- .. -N tilin7116,' a JO 4 ih,... c 9 I EOM I -3. - -4— iwrir.;04011L1114(4 2, 11 q IIIIIIIII III ( IIIL III M r>� , ` ,�t kg ii 10 11 . 1 11104 C l 4 1^ : 1 m it 411 � ,,\ Aparo ..• �' .4.. e J1 1 11111111` L 'l• PIA04-04112,10.1,4 ��! •� ♦ �\ 4 ® `` 1111IIHHII1II4"lI1 ( 1 "1° ':w-ili vivs,'.. . --,44*,,.*11% i 1 � i Ea ( idiredpiir .. 0-1 . \\ \\.0\1;,is ;. i li ,At .\\*.?,\ ._..1.6 r- 1117111114 --- - - o�� \ ���� , A �. a • t f 17rD V\. '- il p34,04:'\,vjp‘ I � , y to 1$Inj G % g kik ; .4 ( _h :P. :1 il -> 4 / 40.,,.' `A .s *JJ `, `a, •a.. ��� G) ;4-,:i q� E'T.� a p l$ —" , . . -.. iplo ,...._ ct.,, z C.:71 i N DESIGNED a NO DATE RE 1O NS DV CK Ni DRAM ;:SS:; CANOE COVE 41E118ccmEProjeclno,lo..1 .... ..K.v. Y CHECKED , Alexander MS lww.SW.t lma 6u9nwng9 -- 8 m. 1�1.1�E e..cu.. &RN wo seta! IATES Eu,a us by N DALE II 1,1 ! AT PORT HADLOCK cnw„�m.n ANdru & Ventura 90°�J5' '°4 TO, y .T M i�l�Ii'� JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 11415 NE lath 10.1•Kwand.RA uSDSK•11011521-1+A+•Ua)sr-sun TAX PROJECT YANACEA Amor... 1 fix_ Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON) SS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON) FRANK W.GARRED,being sworn,says he is the publisher of the Port Townsend Jefferson County Leader,a weekly newspaper which has been established, published in the English language and circulated continuously as a weekly CANCELLATION OF SHORELINE newspaper in the town of Port Townsend in said County and ADVISORY COMMISSION PUBLIC State, and for general circulation in said county for more HEARING than six(6)months prior to the date of the first publication SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL of the Notice hereto attached,and that the said Port Townsend DEVELOPMENT PERMIT Jefferson County Leader was on the 27th day of June 1941 APPLICATION approved as a legal newspaper by the Superior Court of said SDP92-0015 Jefferson County and that annexed is a true copy of the RESIDENTIAL,COMMERCIAL, Cancellation of Shoreline Ad- AND RECREATIONAL visory Commission Public Hearing DEVELOPMENT EXISTING PORT HADLOCK INN AND MARINA SITE Shoreline Substantial Developmen ALEXANDER AND VENTURA, Permit application SDP 92-0015 APPLICANTS Residential, Commercial and NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that recreational development the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shore- line p Management Advisory Commission's public hearing on the Existing Port Hadlock Inn and above proposal has been cancelled. Marina Site The hearing had been scheduled for Wednesday,February 17,1993 at 7:00 PM at the Jefferson County Court- Alexander & Ventura, applicants house. The Shoreline Commission will con- duct their continued hearing of the as it appeared in the regular and entire issue of said paper Washington State Parks Commission's itself not in a supplement thereof for a period of Fort Worden beach access stairway one consecutive weeks,beginning on the 17th proposal on February 17 at 7:00 PM as previously scheduled.The hearing will day of February ,19 93 ,and ending on the be conducted in the City Council Cham- 17th day of February , 1993 ,and bers of Port Townsend City Hall,504 that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscrib- Water Street, Port Townsend, Wash- ers during all of this period. That the full amount of ington. 121 2-17 $ 30 . 15 has been paid in full,at the rate of$7.30 ($6.70 for legal notices received electronically, I odem or disk)per column inch fo h insertion.) Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me this 17th day of February 1993 LOG ITEM . 1 _.;: A, Notary Public'• a d for the State of Washington, .- . ...,. .. _... residing at Port Hadlock. PUBLISH 1 TIME: February 17, 1993 BILL: Jefferson County Planning and Building Department CANCELLATION OF SHORELINE ADVISORY COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION SDP92-0015 RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, AND RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT EXISTING PORT HADLOCK INN AND MARINA SITE ALEXANDER AND VENTURA, APPLICANTS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Advisory Commission's public hearing on the above proposal has been cancelled. The hearing had been scheduled for Wednesday, February 17 , 1993 at 7 : 00 PM at the Jefferson County Courthouse. The Shoreline Commission will conduct their continued hearing of the Washington State Parks Commission's Fort Worden beach access stairway proposal on February 17 at 7 : 00 PM as previously scheduled. The hearing will be conducted in the City Council Chambers of Port Townsend City Hall, 504 Water Street, Port Townsend, Washington. f F--(4 _____, _, , , i �� JEFFERSON COUNTY - PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT � ; !, _ �fVVI p c , U►� �, _ • P.O. Box 1220 /r4 ,._ • '_;% -; Port Townsend, Washington 98368 i'(�1r! -.'e f i 4.1 , �:_ it :,a t Planning(206)385-9140 t .;. Ll 1 ._ , jam - Building(206)385-9141 ` :Y'-- `�` FAX(206)385-9357 JEFFERSON COUNTY COURTHOUSE Craig Ward, Director MEMORANDUM To: Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Advisory Commission members Interested Parties Adjoining Property Owners l From: James W. Pearson, Associate Planner��G � -% Date: February 11, 1993 Re: Shoreline Management Advisory Commission public hearing on Shoreline Substantial Development Permit application SDP92-0015 Canoe Cove (Alexander and Ventura) ; Mixed use development at the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Marina The referenced public hearing scheduled for Wednesday February, 17 , 1993 has been cancelled. There will not be a Shoreline Commission meeting in February. c: Cheryl Halvorson Alexander and Ventura Phil Broms Dave Robison, City of Port Townsend C: \MEMOFORM\SMAC LOG ITEM # 21.-.- i JEFFERSON COUNTY 4, PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ,4rr+,_ 0.'i .. P.O. Box 1220 f? e '; z:: 4 -. Port Townsend, Washington 98368 • -ir F °N- " ' Ill: V ro 'S 4 Planning(206)385-9140 "' ,- `t.` .1=— ;,.„, '�:.)� Building(206)385 9141 1-:,,,,,-:, _-__•_—____-7-- -_�_ ._.� - FAX 2 ( 06)385-9357 JEFFERSON COUNTY COURTHOUSE Craig Ward, Director MEMORANDUM To: Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreli. Management Advisory Commission members r----, Interested Parties Adjoining Property OwnerseVX From: James W. Pearson, Associate Planner Date: February 11, 1993 Re: Shoreline Management Advisory Commission public hearing on Shoreline Substantial Development Permit application SDP92-0015 Canoe Cove (Alexander and Ventura) ; Mixed use development at the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Marina The referenced public hearing scheduled for Wednesday February, 17, 1993 has been cancelled. The Shoreline Commission will conduct their continued hearing of the Washington State Parks Commission's Fort Worden stairway proposal on February 17 at 7: 00 PM as previously scheduled. The hearing will be conducted in the City Council Chambers of Port Townsend City Hall, 504 Water Street, Port Townsend, Washington. c: Cheryl Halvorson Alexander and Ventura Phil Broms John Purcell, Washington State Parks Commission Dave Robison, City of Port Townsend C: \MEMOFORM\SMAC LOG ITEM ## c2(0 . ,, � = JEFFERSON COUNTY . _ . PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPART?,1E 1 s r 3. 3,�4 - •_� -^ ' '— P.O. Box 1220 r '� Port Townsend, Washington 98368 r ', -; 4." 7 _ Planning(206)385-9140 t *:• z R r-1 ,r- .)'�. Building(206)385-9141 ti_n, m_— �--__ FAX(206)385-9357 JEFFERSON COUNTY COURTHOUSE Craig Ward, Director February 5, 1993 Mr. Robert Wheeler, Director Port Townsend Public Works Department 5210 Kuhn Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Re: Canoe Cove development; Alexander and Ventura, applicant; Port Hadlock Dear Mr. Wheeler: Jefferson County has received your comment letter in response to the mitigated determination of nonsignificance for the referenced proposal. This letter is intended to confirm the understanding reached in my telephone conversation with Jim Engle, City Water Superintendent regarding water use and the water distribution system for the proposed development. WATER USE I have sent Mr. Engle a copy of the study of waste water flows prepared by Northwest Territories, Inc. The development's size is limited by the capacity of the septic drainfield. In order to increase the density on the site beyond what had been previously permitted by Jefferson County and still have adequate drainfield capacity, the applicant has proposed water use reduction measures such as low water consumption toilets and shower heads. Depending on State approval a gray water reclamation system may also be installed to provide water for landscaping. Based on the existing and previously permitted uses and the capacity of the existing water distribution system, Mr. Engle estimated that the City's existing water commitment to serve the site was approximately 10,000-12,000 gallons per day. NTI's study estimates that by implementing the proposed water reduction measures, the proposal's projected waste water flows for the residences, restaurant, marina, and health club would be approximately 11 ,500 gallons per day. This would not vary significantly from the City's existing water commitment for the site. I also note that the proposal incorporates additional properties not included in the previously permitted developments, the 1 .6 acre Carlson property to the west of the existing development and 2.4 acres comprised of three separate parcels south of the Alcohol Loop Road. These properties are within the City's service area. Presumably the City would be obligated to provide water to developments on these sites. Based on these considerations, it appears the proposal would not significantly increase the City's existing water service commitments in the area. There would not be a significant adverse impact to water supply. The applicant would not be required to provide additional water supply. LOG ITEM - i WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM Mr. Engle stated his concern that the proposal's water use would have significant impacts on the City's water distribution system in the area easterly of the Oak Bay Road/Flagler Road intersection. He also stated his concern that the existing 6" water line was not adequate to provide the necessary fire flows to the development, especially since the proposal is larger and more dense than the previously approved development on the site. Mr. Engle reiterated the City's position previously stated in your comment letter that the applicant should submit for the City's review and approval a water distribution plan prepared by a licensed civil engineer and that based on this review the applicant should be required to fund improvements to the water distribution system adjacent to the proposal site that are commensurate with the impacts related to the proposal. Mr. Engle stated that this may include installing a 10" line along Oak Bay Road to the City's 8" line serving the Oak Bay Park area and installing a looped 10" line to serve the project along Alcohol Loop Road and Charles Street. Mr. Engle also emphasized that the City hoped to work cooperatively with the applicant and that any infrastructure improvements required would be clearly linked to impacts from the proposal and not intended to correct any existing deficiencies. I also discussed the issue of fire flows with Dick Shuff, Chief of Fire District #1 . He stated that he would rely on the engineering judgement of the City's Public Works Department to determine if the proposed water system could provide adequate fire flows. Based on the comments of the Public Works Department and Fire District #1 , I will recommend that the Jefferson County Planning Director make a finding that the proposal is likely to result in significant adverse impacts to the City of Port Townsend's water distribution system and to the fire fighting capacity of Jefferson County Fire Protection District No. 1 . I will also recommend a mitigating measure stating that in order to avoid these impacts, prior to final plat approval the applicant shall submit to the City of Port Townsend Public Works Department for their review and approval a water distribution plan that has been prepared by a licensed civil engineer and shall enter into an agreement with the City of Port Townsend Public Works Department to fund improvements to the water distribution system adjacent to the proposal site that are commensurate with the impacts related to the proposal. I would appreciate a written response stating whether you concur with this letter. If you have any questions or if I can be of assistance, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sinter- . Jarnes W. Pearson Associate Planner • Alexander and Ventura Dick Shuff, Fire District #1 C:\Letters\PTPWD Department of Public Works 5210 KUHN STREET e =* '4111 s PORT TOWNSEND, WASHINGTON 98368 f, is 206!385-7212 'ctgs.wa 206/385-7675 FAX January 27 , 1993 Craig Ward, Director Planning & Building Department Jefferson County P.O. Box 1220 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Dear Craig: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the determination of nonsignificance to construct a mixed use residential, recreational and commercial development on the site of the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Marina property by Alexander and Ventura. We reviewed the environmental checklist and have the following comments : 1 . Water to the proposal site is supplied by city water. The existing water commitment by the City includes two 2" taps for the hotel , restaurant, and marina and 32 one inch ( 1") and three-quarter (3/4") taps to develop townhouse units on Blue Heron Point. Water improvements included a 6" water line along Alcohol Loop road with two fire hydrants that were installed. 2. The proposal includes a significant increase in the number of dwelling units which may be a significant impact on the existing water system in the Tri-area. The developer, then, must arrange with the city to provide additional water for the proposal. We request the developer prepare a water distribution plan for the proposal and submit it to the City's Water Superintendent, Mr. Jim Engle, for approval. The plan must be prepared by a registered civil engineer. The City does not guarantee that the required amount of water is available from the City's system, If you have any questions regarding the above oommentc, ploaco call Mr. Jim Engle, Water Superintendent at 385-7138 . Sincerely, ZZ Robert L. Wheeler Public Works Director • RLW/ff cc: Dave Robison Jim Engle Department of Public Works ?ORT Toil"� c 5210 KU H N STREET *-174-,77; �o PORT TOWNSEND, WASHINGTON 98368 f} r 206/385-7212 °F WAStk 206/385-7675 FAX -. January 19 , 1993 TO: Bob Wheeler FROM: James E. Engle.' '' 74 RE: Canoe Cove SEPA The development of Villa Marina Lodge and Blue Heron Point was started by Mr. & Mrs. Ray Hanson. They applied and were given commitment of water by the city for 2 2" taps for the hotel, restaurant and marina along with 32 1" and 3/4" taps to develop townhouse units on Blue Heron Point. They extended a 6" water line along Alcohol Loop Rd. and installed 2 fire hydrants. Poor health forced the sale of this development and the commitment to service water by the city to Port Hadlock Inn & Marina was passed on to the new owners and at that time the number of housing units was increased. In reviewing the new plan proposed by Alexander and Ventura for Canoe Cove, there seems to be a substantial increase in the number of living units which will have considerable impact on the existing water system in the tri-area. We recognize and commend the water reclamation and effort to conserve water in this development. We will need to see what other conservation methods are proposed such as low flush toilets and low flow showers, etc. We also would need to see what total build out will be on the property and how the existing water system will tie into future development. JEE/ff Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON) SS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON) FRANK W.GARRED,being sworn,says he is the publisher of the Port Townsend Jefferson County Leader, a weekly newspaper which has been established, published in the English language and circulated continuously as a weekly newspaper in the town of Port Townsend in said County and State, and for general circulation in said county for more NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING than six(6)months prior to the date of the first publication CANOE COVE; ALEXANDER & of the Notice hereto attached,and that the said PortTownsend VENTURA Jefferson County Leader was on the 27th day of June 1941 SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL approved as a legal newspaper by the Superior Court of said DEVELOPMENT PERMIT Jefferson County and that annexed is a true copy of the APPLICATION Notice of public hearing SDP92-015 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Canoe Cove, Alexander and public hearing will be held by the Jef- Ventura ferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Man- agement Advisory Commission on Wednesday, February 17, 1993, at Shore substantial development 7:00 PM in the Third Floor Conference permit application SDP 92-015 Room of the Jefferson County Court- house to review, receive comments, and make a recommendation on a proposal by Alexander&Ventura. In- formation on the proposal is available from the Jefferson Oounty Planning and Building Department (PO Box 1220, Port Townsend, WA 98368). THE PROPOSAL IS to construct a mixed residential,recreational&corn- as it appeared in the regular and entire issue of said paper mercial development.Thero ert is P P Y itself not in a supplement thereof for a period of located within Sections 1 & 12,Town- one 3rd ship 29, Range 1 West, W.M. consecutive weeks,beginning on the 92 2-3 day of February ,19 93 ,and ending on the 3rd day of February , D93 ,and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscrib- ers during all of this period. That the full amount of $ 23 . 45 has been paid in full,at the rate of$7.30 ($6.70 for legal notices received electronically,modem or disk)per column inch r ch insertion. i dip d" / Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3rd day of February 19 93 1 -- e- ` A, td-ii--71 iti s I Notary blicd for the State of Washington, ._� residing at Port Hadlock. PUBLISH 1 TIME: February 3, 1993 BILL: Jefferson County Planning and Building Department NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CANOE COVE; ALEXANDER & VENTURA SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION SDP92-015 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held by the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Advisory Commission on Wednesday, February 17, 1993, at 7:00 PM in the Third Floor Conference Room of the Jefferson County Courthouse to review, receive comments, and make a recommendation on a proposal by Alexander & Ventura. Information on the proposal is available from the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department IPO Box 1220, Port Townsend, WA 98368). THE PROPOSAL IS to construct a mixed residential, recreational & commercial development. The property is located within Sections 1 & 12, Township 29, Range 1 West, W.M. LOG ITEM • ---___ NOTICE OF REVISED ' Affidavit of Publication APPLICATION ,,,,' ALEXANDER AND VENTURA STATE OF WASHINGTON) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that SS the Alexander and Ventura has revised COUNTY OF JEFFERSON) their application tothe Jefferson County Planning and Building Department for FRANK W.GARRED,being sworn,says he is the publisher a mixed use residential, commercial, of the Port Townsend Jefferson County Leader, a weekly and recreational development on the newspaper which has been established, published in the site of the existing Port Hadlock Inn English language and circulated continuously as a weekly and Marina and adjoining property. newspaper in the town of Port Townsend in said County and The revised proposal would elim- State, and for general circulation in said county for more inate 12 attached single family than six(6)months prior to the date of the first publication residences proposed to be located of the Notice hereto attached,and that the said Port Townsend westerly of the existing restaurant and Jefferson County Leader was on the 27th day of June 1941 substitute a 21 unit condominium on approved as a legal newspaper by the Superior Court of said the same site. The proposal also Jefferson County and that annexed is a true copy of the includes the designation of additional open space. Notice of revised application LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The pro- Alexander & Ventura posal site is described as Tax 19, 22, 23, and 24 in Section 1; Tax 21 in Sections 1 and 12;and Tax 23 and 24, Lots 2-12,Block 7 of Bay View Addition, and Lots 35-40 of Irondale Acre Tracts in Section 12, together with adjoining tidelands, all in Township 29 North, Range 1 West,W.M. The proposal is subject to review by Jefferson County under the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA),the Jefferson County Subdivision Ordi- nance, the Jefferson County Interim Zoning Ordinance, and the Jefferson- as it appeared in the regular and entire issue of said paper ,,Port Townsend Shoreline Manage- itself not in a supplement thereof for a period of tment Master Program. Information on one consecutive weeks,beginningonthe 13th .:"`the proposal is available from the day of January 199 3 and on the Jefferson County Planning and Building 13th da of January ending ,and Department (PO Box 1220, Port Y , 1993 Townsend, WA 98368). Information that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscrib- on the proposal is also available at the ers during all of this period. That the full amount of Jefferson County Library in Port $ 48 . 57 has been paid in full,at the rate of$x. Hadlock. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The pro- per column inch for each insertion. 6 . 7 0 i , posal site is subtidal lands belonging '/ , �,tT,/ '�` to the State of Washington and managed by the Washington De- Publisher partment of Natural Resources. The Subscribed and sworn to before me this 13th day of southeast corner of the proposed January 19 9 3 subtidal lands lease is located 1,590, I feet North S%-26'-9"West of the South I /' 1 ) Quarter Corner of Section 1,Township ( C. it,.1(--y',ti(t' . le-,..Act./1 29 North Range 1 West, W.M. _ Notary Public in i for the State of ashington, 019 1 13 LO ITE�� residing at Port Hadlock. e NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CANOE COVE; ALEXANDER & VENTURA SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL ( ), -C-- )--) D Ed? DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 16--c,o4PCY2 • APPLICATION SDP92-015 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a 3 public hearing will be held by the Jef- ferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Man- agement Advisory Commission on Wednesday, February 17, 1993, at 7:00 PM in the Third Floor Conference Room of the Jefferson County Court- house to review, receive comments, and make a recommendation on a5 hc--/..ditA4,2 proposal by Alexander&Ventura. In- 5 PY1, formation on the proposal is available 71)ili r-(4_ g I 0/1 from the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department (PO Box 1220, Port Townsend,WA 98368). THE PROPOSAL IS to construct a DIU °1 mixed residential,recreational&corn- r mercial development.The property is located within Sections 1 &12,Town- ship 29, Range 1 West,W.M. 92 2-3. 7/GU/NY/El t r .Y(/z, 4(t-J LtO 4 cter 514/6-'-6 • LOG ITEM La///L-eti WT 94)365 �1 y /�'✓/J// /662: ¢�_/// i.(17/144-, /// J C,/ D� 7 I 1. r , i%' t , ` 4x99_ 0 0/57- ' \,,_,0 a/../-2t_ _ . -/L.,./..-1 --O---4C/?--e.-Z- f- . ._,..,7/ er. ' j----/ 2 a/27. 29 .4- Ate41-- 1-' v-/---/ - -- nom_ �.�ae z: ,.- ,%t ' e . c� - . 1....e._ 3 ,htzcz- , Z(-64,Zee'64/y). (- c-_- ,e.--te,2-i 4:2,o-a..• , c .7 14._e_2? c,e-2z) :cc ei-)c, ,___6,./ _ , e--4,..,.., , ,i/L-66,:k4(_;-yra) .„,6,(. .ezz., 0-4zi.-1(6,-2._' -Z-- _. � / t r f .7-ze-Y .. 4'__, „;0-40- c__e--7& CaLoat Ce_i Jai K' _ o , e_ LP a,X1-. -_.',,14,_,) _ .. A.zym .: /. pia, )6.6 -1__L-- , 4 ,fte ,zr_buz„) ..., z� X 02.71 ....lo ca..... .. y aoee _, -_ )4,46-1g-diaz.14 .,. _, c,-/2ac , 4 _______a2/FL', ./... .... x C 9/a ; __ ecLLC d_ __ 1 _ .4L_e., __ .__ s a 976 L' '�'_tCf 4.44/ - Alf • ate C .0 e_ _ _ ( +_./),__e I (/ ei--(,,27c2.'eii2(A'\ s)-60/- 14-)?_,%YA/:_i2 , ,9/L,_ ,40a-Z - - Aze--t � L-' ) _I I/ _9,-Lectijidea, ___()_f_e_i__ ___o_j_ziejL .3 _. . (72 / ,,c,L.)c.-c - .C.,072 • - ' ' CoLCCZ . _% 7 `z,.. Gi a�' o� ,,ei,--r , • LOG TEMJc �C) .. _A( L, a a. • e • -. _ . . .- 7 • . 1 EY 1 L.: Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON) 00 c s} a C).1 (v m. N ,7 S S 0) m °0 a;N-0 Q Q 3 a P COUNTY OF JEFFERSON) �D Hr- c� a, �- c e[ a) N. E_ --I- N j c m 3 �n FRANK W.CARRED,being sworn,says he is the publisher c-I- z U) °'g ›..2 o F°- of the Port Townsend Jefferson County Leader, a weekly -o m 0 a N FO v c ami m ° '- newspaper which has been established, published in the c c n .... rn ei ° ,__ © N w a, - English language and circulated continuously as a weekly • i « E c.` U c a) u) E •-U u ° evi r'' �• c-p m y newspaper in the town of Port Townsend in said County and c E r o 0� Yui ° o ° ca .--1.1) ® c-o ° tq•„•, m ' , State, and for general circulation in said county for more r to the date of cation '5 0 w©`"-' •N �o m C ) 4- of the Notice he eto attacched,and that the the id PortTohwnsend Et' m 2 g<•. c N a-g. �p° , ' Jefferson County Leader was on the 27th day of June 1941 E E c w w - N - 4.c'- ~, approved as a legal newspaper b the Superior Court of said N o a� row c) °c to c a-° Jefferson County and that annexed is a true co of the oo cio ° cr)ek ® ° tY copy n cv to � �t` ego Z �..+.,t c c - E 0 S o m a,.°, Notice of application Shore- = C ° °5. �, c © line Substantial devellopment O 0 3 ©, ' c a ezi co Eck permit o m w c mai © © m Application SDP92-0015 °00` U) �, F o:0 a o Alexander and Ventura, applicant w :O - Oca m° V V C0 °_ c • c-� i "s o om-a) cc c © 0 , Em_0. om)cE ` cmm• g. mmo ° E EU a) - U . acn °i a))HZ © 2c N2tN 2° f%..-- v0ELc)I- d c c 0 Ca m 3 Q °' -3a E v"c as it appeared in the regular and entire issue of said paper _c m, °c o 3 co itself not in a supplement thereof for a period of z B F-Y ce z a (,;,3 'co.o o _c'T. one consecutive weeks,beginning on the 11th ©f=Z©1_ j m o CD m m 3 ci day of November ,19 9 2,and ending on the U a w w w C7 , a® c c ?, m o l lthday of November ,199 2 ,and a(,) cJ Q z m m co 8 , 0) 00-73 Y „ that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscrib- a.n z z o Q - E--6 2-2 n- ers during all of this period. That the full amount of LL w ©Q w m o z c.c r $ 4 0. 95 has been paid in full,at the rate of,5�¢(Q Ozaw4z-0 o °) > r.2 o ° U.1 J 01--a 0 Q U v a°.a o .O¢' per column inch for each insertion. I ��$6. 3 0 V W W U z w illiU s rn mu z 0 Q- © c°&-0 E m.c __'x Publisher Q Z m-'•- •o °'c ~ is co Subscribed and sworn to before me this 11th day of Q 2E °-c •`- November ,19 92 . i Oj ! +_10 ITEM Notary Public`wand for the State of Washington, i g residing at Port Hadlock. PUBLISH: One time; November 11 , 1992 BILL: Jefferson County Planning and Building Dept. NOTICE OF APPLICATION SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION SDP92-0015 ALEXANDER AND VENTURA, APPLICANT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Alexander and Ventura have applied to Jefferson County for approval for a mixed use residential, recreational, and commercial development on the site of the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Marina and adjoining property. The proposal includes the following: 1) Renovation of the west wing of the existing Alcohol Plant to create 8 residential artist studio condominiums, a restaurant, and a recreation center with swimming pool; 2) Demolition of the east wing of the Alcohol Plant; 3) Construction of 61 single family residences; 4) Construction of three 21-unit condominiums; and 5) Designation of open space. The proposal is subject to review by Jefferson County under the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shorelines Management Master Program. Information on the proposal is available from the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department (PO Box 1220, Port Townsend, WA 98368). Comments concerning the Shoreline Permit review must be submitted to the Planning Department by THURSDAY, DECEMBER 10, 1992. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The proposal site is described as Tax 19, 22, 23, and 24 in Section 1 ; Tax 21 in Sections 1 and 12; and Tax 23 and 24, Lots 2-12, Block 7 of Bay View Addition, and Lots 35-40 of Irondale Acre Tracts in Section 12, together with adjoining tidelands, all in Township 29 North, Range 1 West, W.M. LOG ITEM 1 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING PUBLIC NOTICE` wlk � 14 a�`L State of Washington) County of Jefferson) I, . o Mt A • V „=-NT4 rest- , being duly sworn on oath say that I have posted three public notices on posting boards provided by the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department on or near the site identified in the following proposed development description: 1 . Application for approval of a mixed use residential, recreational, and commercial development on the site of the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Marina and adjoining property. The proposal is subject to environmental review and threshold determination under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA); Subdivision review under the Jefferson County Subdivision Ordinance; Interim Zoning approval Conditional Use review under the County Emergency Zoning Ordinance; and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit under the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shorelines Management Master Program. These three notices were posted in full compli nce with all applicable Jefferson County ordinances 'on the 2.12P--day of N o v�-�-,g�—K , 1992, at i No+a k b AL-c.oI-IcC_ Loo r 20.4A e,1 EW -MANC ;V -n-1-6- /NN. 2 IJo£n+ EALCAlfCt 1-o0? ('CLAD EXT1ZA iu(c ib 12o3ibCw7/:4C S ,W- 3) s o(.;-n-I 0 F'. v.4 k g.4 Y R-o A-b /1-T D 2.4 1 t4 F I c=c . 1 1��-- (Signature of person postingnotice) Subscribed and sworn to before Mme on this X.-4 day of ,;7-e- v(..- ,--6 E---(... , 1992. ,a",, ' ! 1 ..i1,,,\ } ; ^ otary 'ublic .nd or the State of sa •'v--_ -fa ington , residing in - ...- - ,„„wJ , as ington. `4-„,/,,,,'-,,,„,11,,,..:*,,,,,_SI ;f�� My commission expires4.r„9f /y'93 . Or f Es ! i LT^ ITEM NOTICE^OF APPLICATION AND PENDING THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Affidavit of Publication SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT STATE OF WASHINGTON) APPLICATION SDP92-0015, SS LONG PLAT APPLICATION, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON) INTERIM ZONING APPROVAL FRANK W.GARBED,being sworn,says he is the publisher CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION of the Port Townsend Jefferson County Leader, a weekly ALEXANDER AND VENTURA, APPLICANT newspaper which has been established, published in the NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that English language and circulated continuously a oa weekly Alexander and Ventura have applied newspaper in the town of Por[Townsend in said Cuntyand to Jefferson County for approval for a State, and for general circulation in said county for more than six(6)months prior to the date of the first publication mixed use residential,recreational,and commercial development on the site of of Nhhed,and the said PortTownsend the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Ma- Jefferson Countyoticeereto Leaderattacwas onthat the 27th day of June 1941 rina and adjoining property, approved as a legal newspaper by the Superior Court of said The proposal includes the follow Jefferson County and that annexed is a true copy of the ing: (1) Renovation of the west win of Application SDP 92 — 0015 the existing Alcohol Plant to create 8 Alexander and Ventura, applicant residential artist studio condominiums, a restaurant, and a recreation center with swimming pool; (2) Demolition of the east wing of the Alcohol Plant; (3)Construction of 61 single family residences; (4) Construction of three 21-unit condominiums;and (5)Designation of open space. The proposal is subject to the fol- lowing reviews by Jefferson County: Environmental review and threshold determination under the State Envi- ronmental Policy Act(SEPA);Subdivi as it appeared in the regular and entire issue of said paper sionreviewundertheJeffersonCounty itself not in a supplement thereof for a period of One consecutive weeks,beginning on the 4th Subdivision Ordinance; Interim Zon- ing Approval Conditional Use reviewday of November ,199 2 ,and ending on the undertheJefferson County Emergency 4th day of November 1992_,and Zoning Ordinance;and Shoreline Sub- stantial Development Permit underthe that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscrib- ers during all of this period. That the full am Jefferson-Port Townsend Shorelinesount of Management Master Program. $ 67 . 7 2 has been paid in full,at the rate of :. Information on the proposal isavail- per column inch for eac insertion. $6 . 3 0 able from the Jefferson County Plan- ,,g (t.)- ning and Building Department(PO Box 1220, Port Townsend, WA 98368). Comments concerning the SEPA,Sub- Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me this 4th day of division, and Interim Zoning review of this proposal must be submitted to the November ,1992 . Planning Department by WEDNES DAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1992. (4°1-4/41L- ,�►� -;_ /�r-/lt. `,r� ,��f Comments concerning the Shore- line Permit review must t_e submitted LOG Notary Fublic• for the State of Washington, to the Planning Department by THURS- LOG ITEM residing a PortHadlock. DAY, DECEMBER 10, 1992, t LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The pro- ---- posal site is described as Tax 19, 22, 23, and 24 in Section 1; Tax 21 in Sections 1 and 12;and Tax 23 and 24, Lots 2-12, Block 7 of Bay View Addi- tion, and Lots 35-40 of Irondale Acre Tracts in Section 12, together with adjoining tidelands,all in Township 29 North, Range 1 West, W.M. VARIANCES ARE REQUESTED from the following requirements of the Jefferson County Subdivision Ordi- nance: Road right-of-way standards (Section 6.309),road construction stan- dards(Sections 6.309 and 6.401),and lot design standards(Section 6.301), A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED from Section 6.5(d)of the Jefferson County Emergency Zoning Ordinance ud,i,4, PUBLISH: One time; November 4, 1992 BILL: Jefferson County Planning and Building Dept. NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PENDING THRESHOLD DETERMINATION SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION SDP92-0015, LONG PLAT APPLICATION, INTERIM ZONING APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION ALEXANDER AND VENTURA, APPLICANT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Alexander and Ventura have applied to Jefferson County for approval for a mixed use residential, recreational, and commercial development on the site of the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Marina and adjoining property. The proposal includes the following: 1 ) Renovation of the west wing of the existing Alcohol Plant to create 8 residential artist studio condominiums, a restaurant, and a recreation center with swimming pool; 2) Demolition of the east wing of the Alcohol Plant; 3) Construction of 61 single family residences; 4) Construction of three 21-unit condominiums; and 5) Designation of open space. The proposal is subject to the following reviews by Jefferson County: Environmental review and threshold determination under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA); Subdivision review under the Jefferson County Subdivision Ordinance; Interim Zoning Approval Conditional Use review under the Jefferson County Emergency Zoning Ordinance; and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit under the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shorelines Management Master Program. Information on the proposal is available from the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department (PO Box 1220, Port Townsend, WA 98368). Comments concerning the SEPA, Subdivision, and Interim Zoning review of this proposal must be submitted to the Planning Department by WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1992. Comments concerning the Shoreline Permit review must be submitted to the Planning Department by THURSDAY, DECEMBER 10, 1992. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The proposal site is described as Tax 19, 22, 23, and 24 in Section 1 ; Tax 21 in Sections 1 and 12; and Tax 23 and 24, Lots 2-12, Block 7 of Bay View Addition, and Lots 35-40 of Irondale Acre Tracts in Section 12, together with adjoining tidelands, all in Township 29 North, Range 1 West, W.M. VARIANCES ARE REQUESTED from the following requirements of the Jefferson County Subdivision Ordinance: Road right-of-way standards (Section 6.309), road construction standards (Sections 6.309 and 6.401 ), and lot design standards (Section 6.301). A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED from Section 6.5(d) of the Jefferson County Emergency Zoning Ordinance which provides minimum multifamily building setback standards. LOG ITEM # ' 1 Jefferson County Planning and Building Department Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Application SDP92-001 5 Date: October 22, 1992 Applicant: Alexander and Ventura Proposal: A mixed use residential, recreational, and commercial development on the site of the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Marina and adjoining property. The proposal includes the following: 1) Renovation of the west wing of the existing Alcohol Plant to create 8 residential artist studio condominiums, a restaurant, and a recreation center with swimming pool; 2) Demolition of the east wing of the Alcohol Plant; 3) Construction of 61 single familyresidences;g es dences; 4) Construction of three 21-unit condominiums; and 5) Designation of open space. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The proposal site is described as Tax 19, 22, 23, and 24 in Section 1; Tax 21 in Sections 1 and 12; and Tax 23 and 24, Lots 2-12, Block 7 of Bay View Addition, and Lots 35-40 of lrondale Acre Tracts in Section 12, together with adjoining tidelands, all in Township 29 North, Range 1 West, W.M. Shoreline: Port Townsend Bay Designation: Urban and Aquatic Use: Primary and Conditional Shoreline of State-wide Significance: Yes Variance: No Applicable Master Program Sections: 1 .20 Purposes; 4.101 Aquatic; 4.105 Urban; 4.201 Primary Uses; 4.203 Conditional Uses; 4.30 Shorelines of State-wide Significance; 5.50 Commercial; 5.110 Marinas; 5.140 Parking; 5.160 Residential Development; 5.190 Transportation Facilities; 5.200 Utilities Publish: November 4 and 11 , 1992 SEPA comments by: November 17, 1992 Shoreline permit comments by: December 17, 1992 Application notice to: Craig Ward Jefferson County Board of Commissioners Jefferson County Health Department Jefferson County Public Works Department Jefferson County Historical Society Fire District No. 1 Public Utility District No. 1 Point No Point Treaty Council Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe State Office of Archeology Wa. Dept. of Fisheries Wa. Dept. of Wildlife LOG ITEM . • JEFFERSON COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT PO BOX 1220 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 206-385-9140 POSTING INSTRUCTION FOR NOTICE OF PENDING THRESHOLD DETERMINATION SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION SPD92-0015 LONG PLAT APPLICATION, INTERIM ZONING APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Alr EXANDER AND VENTURA, APPLICANT In accordance with all applicable Jefferson County Ordinances regarding the above- referenced applications, notice must be made of all proposals subject to environmental review, shoreline development, long subdivision application, and interim zoning conditional use. Please post the three attached notices on three 2 foot by 3 foot posting boards you have already obtained from this department in separate and conspicuous locations on or reasonably near the site of the proposed development by November 4, 1992. The notices should not be removed until after you receive notice of approval on your applications from Jefferson County. Complete the affidavit, have it notarized, and return it to this office. If you have any questions, please contact this office. l0�3 g; -,-cc { AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING PUBLIC NOTICE State of Washington) County of Jefferson) I, , being duly sworn on oath say that I have , posted three public notices on posting boards provided by the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department on or near the site identified in the following proposed development description: 1 . Application for approval of a mixed use residential, recreational, and commercial development on the site of the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Marina and adjoining property. The proposal is subject to environmental review and threshold determination under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA); Subdivision review under the Jefferson County Subdivision Ordinance; Interim Zoning approval Conditional Use review under the County Emergency Zoning Ordinance; and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit under the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shorelines Management Master Program. These three notices were posted in full compliance with all applicable Jefferson County ordinances on the day of , 1992, at (Signature of person posting notice) Subscribed and sworn to before me on this day of , 1992. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington , residing in Washington. My commission expires NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PENDING THRESHOLD DETERMINATION "SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION SDP92-0015, LONG PLAT APPLICATION, INTERIM ZONING APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION ALEXANDER AND VENTURA, APPLICANT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Alexander and Ventura have applied to Jefferson County for approval for a mixed use residential, recreational, and commercial development on the site of the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Marina and adjoining property. The proposal includes the following: 1) Renovation of the west wing of the existing Alcohol Plant to create 8 residential artist studio condominiums, a restaurant, and a recreation center with swimming pool; 2) Demolition of the east wing of the ! Alcohol Plant; 3) Construction of 61 single family residences; 4) Construction of three 21-unit condominiums; and 5) Designation of open space. The proposal is subject to the following reviews by Jefferson County: Environmental review and threshold determination under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA); Subdivision review under the Jefferson County Subdivision Ordinance; Interim Zoning Approval Conditional :Use review under the Jefferson County Emergency Zoning Ordinance; and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit under the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shorelines Management Master Program. Information on the proposal is available from the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department (PO Box 1220, Port Townsend, WA 98368). Comments concerning the SEPA, Subdivision, and Interim Zoning review of this proposal must be submitted to the Planning Department by WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1992. Comments concerning the Shoreline Permit review must be submitted to the Planning Department by THURSDAY, DECEMBER 10, 1992. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The proposal site is described as Tax 19, 22, 23, and 24 in Section 1 ; Tax 21 in Sections 1 and 12; and Tax 23 and 24, Lots 2-12, Block 7 of Bay View Addition, and Lots 35-40 of Irondale Acre Tracts in Section 12, together with adjoining tidelands, all in Township 29 North, Range 1 West, W.M. VARIANCES ARE REQUESTED from the following requirements of the Jefferson County Subdivision Ordinance: Road right-of-way standards (Section 6.309), road construction standards (Sections 6.309 and 6.401 ), and lot design standards (Section 6.301 ). A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED from Section 6.5(d) of the Jefferson County Emergency Zoning Ordinance which provides minimum multifamily building setback standards. t` /a f j,, ,,.L�..t� �. i�, NOTICE OF APPLICATION AND PENDING THRESHOLD DETERMINATION SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION SDP92-0015 LONG PLAT APPLICATION, INTERIM ZONING APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION ALEXANDER AND VENTURA, APPLICANT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Alexander and Ventura have applied to Jefferson County for approval for a mixed use residential, recreational, and commercial development on the site of the existing Port Hadlock Inn and Marina and adjoining property. The proposal includes the following: 1 ) Renovation of the west wing of the existing Alcohol Plant to create 8 residential artist studio condominiums, a restaurant, and a recreation center with swimming pool; 2) Demolition of the east wing of the Alcohol Plant; 3) Construction of 61 single family residences; 4) Construction of three 21 -unit condominiums; and 5) Designation of open space. The proposal is subject to the following reviews by Jefferson County: Environmental review and threshold determination under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA); Subdivision review under the Jefferson County Subdivision Ordinance; Interim Zoning Approval Conditional Use review under the Jefferson County Emergency Zoning Ordinance; and Shoreline Substantial Development Permit under the Jefferson- Port Townsend Shorelines Management Master Program. Information on the proposal is available from the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department (PO Box 1220, Port Townsend, WA 98368). Comments concerning the SEPA, Subdivision, and Interim Zoning review of this proposal must be submitted to the Planning Department by WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1992. Comments concerning the Shoreline Permit review must be submitted to the Planning Department by THURSDAY, DECEMBER 10, 1992. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The proposal site is described as Tax 19, 22, 23, and 24 in Section 1 ; Tax 21 in Sections 1 and 12; and Tax 23 and 24, Lots 2-12, Block 7 of Bay View Addition, and Lots 35-40 of Irondale Acre Tracts in Section 12, together with adjoining tidelands, all in Township 29 North, Range 1 West, W.M. VARIANCES ARE REQUESTED from the following requirements of the Jefferson County Subdivision Ordinance: Road right-of-way standards (Section 6.309), road construction standards (Sections 6.309 and 6.401 ), and lot design standards (Section 6.301 ). A VARIANCE IS REQUESTED from Section 6.5(d) of the Jefferson County Emergency Zoning Ordinance which provides minimum multifamily building setback standards. �t 1 Post-Ir brand fax transmittal memo 7671 I#of pages ► J To Dar Y OF FORT 'I'OWNSE'ND Co. � ��,{= r+. Co. Dept. .1t FC0 TIAL DEVELOPMENT Phone# Pi Fax# ��� 4 3 5�2 —s-) ZS- Fax NO . SD — 00 / The Washington State Shoreline Management Act (ROW 90.58) requires that substantial developments within designated shorelines of the state comply with its administrative procedures (MAC 173-14) and the provisions of the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program. The purpose of this Act and the local Program is to protect the state's shoreline resources in the best interest of the public by ensuring that reasonable and appropriate uses be made of these resources. The Program requires that substantial development (any development of which the total cost or fair market value exceeds $2,500 or materially interferes with the normal public use of the water or shorelines of the state be reviewedwith the goals, policies; and performance standards established in the Master Program. APPLICANT: A L t-x.a T/DCR_ * 1/ -N 7-14 J 4 ADDRESS: ) 2 1 S S ErN EC A s-ne-C--T 5 Eat}.7 7z tit/A , %eS'/o / TELEPHONE: (home) ZO - 72-6 -- //3 47 (business) 2-O( 382 - C 3E AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE: o E ;:~7�t 7-1-re A ADDRESS: I2 1 Sc-TIEcA S'-r?z..e- 7 56A 771--E WA 9 Si L► TELEPHONE: (home) '2-06- 72 6 /139 (business) 2 u h 3 8 2. - DS RE CT= ONS 1. Answer all questions completely (please print or type). Contact the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department or the City of Port Townsend for aid in filling out this application and for instructions on further administrative procedures required to complete its processing. 2. Attach any additional information (reports, studies, maps, illustrations, leases, permits, etc.) that may further describe the proposed development or be required by Jefferson County or the City of Port Townsend in addition to the development plan. 3. Check with appropriate departments to determine if the proposed development requires additional permits or approvals. A permit issued under the Jefferson-Port Townsend Shoreline Management Master Program will not excuse a permittee from complying with other local, state, and federal ordinances, regulations, or statutes applicable to the proposed development. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION GENERAL LOCATION: 2-O) 4 L e--o f.1 c)L La P .o A 1� 'Po .T /4 A-D Lo c-k 2 LEGAL (from property tax statement): SEC / 77 4x.14 LAND OWNERSHIP: 1. APPLICANT: 0 Owner 0 Lessee Contract Purchaser 0 Other: 2. OWNER'S NAME & ADDRESS (if other than applicant): V1L4.A- I-1 / -/NA PA-le TNErs / N 2c1his 2`17 - 20/ (o �p ,�_" e • FOR OFFICE USE ONLY USE: .f 1tC DESIGNATION(S): VARIANCE: YES NO APPLICABLE SUBSECTIONS: 1i CHARACTERISTICS. Identify and describe existing features of the site and surrounding area including water bodies such as streams, lakes, marine waters, marshes, and flood plains; the shoreline such as low or high bank and rocky or sandy beach; developments or structures; vegetation. CC ATTAR- 1 SYNoi' IS DEVELOPMENT DESCRI PT= ON Identify and describe the proposed project, including the type of materials to be used, construction methods, principal dimensions, and other pertinent information: SCE ATTA C-;-46b PLANS $ 12g S'fW PS (S USE (commercial, residential, recreational, etc.): (-11 XE-b (.r SE Cort t'« t-- 4 �L ESTIMATED COST/FAIR MARKET VALUE: COMPLETION DATE: 1. /1 %` 1 !l�� b E c-N t� N S. ON h1 A z k Cr C ,i A i77 c i4 S DEVELOPMENT Sc SITE PLANS The DEVELOPMENT PLAN shall consist of a vicinity map, site plan (aerial view), and elevation plan (profile view); it will be no larger than 11 by 17 inches. A larger development is acceptable in SOME cases, but the applicant will be required to supply enough copies for project review. The plan shall be to scale, suitable for reproduction, and identify the north direction. 2. The VICINITY MAP shall be drawn in one corner of the development plan and shall indicate the location of the proposed development to the nearest geographical features (community, water body, major road, mountain, valley, etc.). 3. The SITE AND ELEVATION PLANS shall illustrate the proposed project and surrounding area including: water bodies and wetlands; the line of ordinary high or low water or mean higher high or lower low water; existing and proposed changes to the topography or ground relief; vegetation; existing structures or developments; unique site features; and any other information that would describe the proposal and area. The SITE PLAN shall indicate property boundaries. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I hereby declare, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the foregoing information and all attached information is true and correct. (date) (authorized signature) JEFFERSON COUNTY' ENVI R01N?4ENTAL CHECKLI ST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21C, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of thq environment. The purpose of)this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal; reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done; and help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. PROPONENT: A LEKANbCR. 4 UEN7-ug.A ADDRESS: 12- I s S tr N N e STr.c r S L;A-Fr c;- , tit" . 9 E/p 1 TELEPHONE: (home) 2_06 - 72,6- //3' (business) 2 o 6 - 7 Z6 - /13`f AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE/CONTACT: To t'lE V ENTu lz14 ADDRESS: 1 2.. 1 5 S EN ECIi STY2- TET • S 1 A-rrL , L 'A g10 , - TELEPHONE: (home) 2 - 72.6- //3 i (business) 2 0(!> .-- 3 32- 03 31 -'t M Ek '` q65 - 825Z DI RECTI ONS "1") _,./82 - 00Zc-7 This checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The questions apply to the entire proposal, including those phased over a period of time or on separate parcels of land. Answer each question accurately and completely to avoid unnecessary delays in processing this checklist. If you do not know an answer, write "unknown," or if a question does not apply, write "not applicable." • Answers to some questions may require special expertise or technical assistance from qualified persons. The cost of obtaining such information is the responsibility of the proponent. Attach any additional information (reports, studies, maps, illustrations, leases, permits, etc.) that may further describe the proposal or be required by Jefferson County. Contact the Jefferson County Planning and Building Department for assistance in completing the checklist, and for information on the administrative procedures for its processing. • PLEASE PRINT IN INK OR TYPE EACH ANSWER. DO NOT WRITE IN THE AREA DESIGNATED "EVALUATION." PROPOSAL AND PROPERTY' DESCRIPTION PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION • (include all factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and purpose): This PROPOSAL r S Fait A h 1 )(et. +.(Sc.= Peale-C-7 W +1-4-1 THEsty. CohiPONENTS „ (� RE-NoVATE 4 i2Es-r 2i y E.X� sT,Ny alt+cDlNc, (F0a1-1 12 AtcoHoL ?I-ANT), 12E1-1OV114C/ /7s cAs-r w/"14 A1Vb CZt AT,NC A kEr -AT,o►.1 CEN t- wi-n-1 S PooL/ A `iZt-Sr AND s 'IZEs+ bk')-I Ti AL AkTdST S714010 CaNboFiiw, HM-i. Z Ru +LD 61 (our is exisr,N4) S/ )=A1- Czus ect Rc/- - ON 2 C- ' I-c ; N Li,i 3, git+c )1 3 11 1�N /T kit( tri-•F/an r•�Y c'a,vbo A-t/N wtr /-1 PiWJtA/Ny'Se,� `I• Pla SEWA/E. The VI TLA,. D (TUE' CANOE PO,,b) gr C_ RCAT/,•14 VA('a+C.LS OP&)i SPAcr1-72_14 cis "71-/47 r,IcLu6E- 714c wCTLANb BL, FFC S S +FO&.C L I NE ai 5.) C R-E A TE.- PCla t-14 C N CASE-14 T Foie P c(a Ll c AcceSs Tn Ta-IE HAi1NA kEAkw'VATL-, SEE A 'TTAC.14€---b PR: TETT • SYNopsgS . LOG ITEM PROPERTY AND AREA DESCRIPTION: Address: 201E1' L G�, Not'_ LOOP ' k'_OA Legal (from property tax statement): Lot: Block: Subdivision: S E ATTA C rt Tax Parcel: Quarter Sections: Section: Township: Range: Tax Number: S € E A TT A C I-1 6.--t Land Area (dimensions): 3 25- AC2CS (F2ct-i E 6 or VC ETATION) `� Describe the location, physical characteristics, and extent of land area to be affected; include all factors that will give an accurate understanding "of the property and its environment: 114 ME Mau.: 3 AR-zAS OF LANb : I.) AN AREA eF Um-34 Acges LocA-rt-A AQ7ACr`NT 7zt ALCOHOL. Coo? 12-0AI . 2.) AN A (LL(LA OF 1, /1 Ac.kars ONN Eiraere. s<be of oil 1` t3 AY_ 12.o46. AND 3•) An( AREA OF 7. 35 ACg-Ec Seu'TN OF HAYS STZE-ET. A2FA .tt/ iNCCLlbCS TF1i` S1-to2L:L/N1E . SCHEDULE (beginning and ending dates of the proposal, including phases): CONST-uuC'i7o/4 70 6E0N LaPoN iSSciANCE OF pc:Et'1+TS ANI cTiD,Nc 3 -S • Yr`M S TNc'IzrAFitk PoSsigLt FuTiAa_e bEVLLoPrte-Nli ON Dt`AiNFie-Lt PAP-CtLS tF SEW ER. act-CcrE-S At/AicAtit.E'. OVERALL PLAN (describe future additions, ddtons, expansions, or related activities or plans by others that may affect the proposal): PLAN ( 5 G_ot-ipt_ e7e- /N T3tiS PIioPosAC , ExC T IF bkAiN17--/E-16 PAR-CC-LS P, cco1-1c toVAti- 4 ALE `ME kNCW OF No PLANS Ry ©T C S. • REQUIRED APPROVALS (all local, state, and federal p ovals that are required reled to for the mp enols of this pproposal and if any approvals are pending QCC�uike�S' 51402CL, Nc PCYLHir, LONG SuADiviSioN }1YDQAutie- ST7,1 H WATr-k) PCR_Ft i C�NbiT1ONAt_ LLSC, VA2+ ANC� (L CST ANC) (3itie DiNCi P��12M i i ENVIRONMENTAL DATA (any existing- or proposed environmental information such as studies or documents related to the proposal): SEE ATTACW ETc.ArI ' S 2(ET o-T BY el 1:4_04' 1s-7- DYANE SWet_ DoN/ 4 As so ciA tc S . • • -2- • ENV2 RONMENTAra COMMENTS EVALUATION EARTH 1. Check the item that describes the site: Q flat rolling 0 hilly 0 steep slopes O mountainous other: B L- L F F AT N 012_7-7-1 eAs rr-72N S t?E-L/NC. 2. What is the steepest slope on the site? Identify the approximate percent of the slope: Pt,.u F F A r Si+o2e ci e. (90 ° ) 3. What general types of soils are found on the site (sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland: N o Y P u S ( e A 3J EL L y Lo ANY SAND SOILS . • 4. Are there surface indications or a history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe them: tiV o N E. 5. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Identify the source of the fill: 1-1-1Eie..e via No I MPoF /-D og ExP0FILL. •-fl - t-i veb EiNG C-aWC2.EwiLL GC G-I u S H ED AND u 5 t1 01-I 5�"TF. 6. Could erosion occur as a result of • clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe it: 1J0. -rC ex -/A/c c 4be& A2-E L`XCEa_EUT Artb CONST7.14cT?oA.r WALE /Ai cogPoP.A'Te— T oSf C ADEM. 7. About what percent of the site would be covered with impervious surfaces after construction of the project (that is, asphalt or buildings)? A p p TeX 10 % •TZE-SAL C-oNST12L4r. r? 0>4 8. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control erosion or other impacts to the earth, if any: WE wiLL 8C usintq sr LT FEThic/Arc� WI 714 !� A Y B A LE-S b u t t ./ c T7a e= I-1 t N I el A t✓ S N Ati-e,10 cA VATtan/ Fog. oa-nN� S . AIR 9. What types of emissions to the air, if any, would result from the proposal during construction and when the project is completed (dust, car odors, industrial wood smoke)? Generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known: CoN sra“c TI oN tNm1Z11 rTrAtNT SMALL Qt(AT7TtES of EYHHNS i I SAwbctsi AN6 Oce4T7oNAL e, uaN/A/4, 1-I P t e"1"7 o N s fz t3TA"A 2A N r $ hlo M E S . 10. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odors that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe them: 1\1 o. • • -3- EVALUATIQe, r.: • 11. Describe proposed measures dto euce or if any:control emissions or other impacts to the air, p t-t tZ- C Q L.t + P r-c HAS ` S N � F F e-CS" Wt4ICi4 b2.AST/( 4 LLY R-E-bCACC EM I5l oHS' WATER Surface Water 12. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site, including year-round or seasonal streams, salt waters, lakes, ponds, and wetlands? If yes, describe the type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream,or river Tit flows into: 4 o (ZT7-I Pao PC-2?Y cirlfTo T w M S e.-r4 P E3 AY• ''-i E N o 2 TN w ES T Co GaNT'AS A W ETLAM D KNouJN AS 7-74-C 'c4NoC PoND'. 5CE ATI-AC/411) tivETt_A�►D 2€1209.-T. 13. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to the described waters (within 200 feet)? If yes, describe the work and attach available plans: YES 11-102E ss Art EX/5-0/44 B u t t. b/N w rr 14 i n/ 2_00 p - Po-SC C-0-1-TA c CS W I'771 4N 2.00 : SCC A`rTACNt'7D FtAN s. 14. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed or removed from the surface waters or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Identify the source of the fill material: /4© N C- 15. Will the proposal require surface water desc description and or diversions? Give a general identify the purpose and approximate quantities, if known: 0, 16. Does the proposal lie non withinath100-yeare plflood plain? If so, note the location 17. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge: N 0. Ground Water- 18. Will ground water withdrawn n or• Give will a water general discharged to ground e purpose and description and identify the pur p approximate quantities, if known: /Vo• -4- EVALUATION 19. Describe the waste material that would be discharged ' into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (domestic sewage; industrial wastes and chemicals contained; agricultural wastes). Describe the general size of the system; the number of such systems; the number of houses to be served, if applicable, or the number Of: animals or humans the system(s) is expected to serve: TH e-zE Ake 3 ex's7-/r/4 S EPT,c S YS7-H S A p dz4>N - F,ELbS c_14 14 At/ r-1oKE r4AN LNOuGN CAP Ac' Pry. SEE A-TTAc_I-1t�D ANALysis I3 ( . NT1 t-Tlri >NE-672.S _ Water Run-Off (including storm water) 20. Describe the source of run-off, including storm water. Describe the method of collection and disposal, if any, including any known quantities. Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe it: I`� �{„ 5ro a I-1 W A-rt-12- >r 2-c•1-1 I r-t P t-12_U t o u S S u tz F A G c--S W i L Bt c_c> T�� , F,L', tYLEb fad CASs LA-Nb S+.Q A L-ES AND b i s c i-I A 2 c € T6 1-1-16 BAY. SEE A-rT/WA-►ED PLA NS, 21. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generallycescribe how: O 22. Describe proposed measures to reduce, or control surface, ground, and run-off water impacts, if any: SNE PRIVATE TLOAbwA`i'S AKE: (Fti "ro BE a L AsS c 2cTE i IAS/n/�' 1 RASH /-105S W e #e-E A Lst L-t$i ig G (LASS Si-u moi` �to/4- PLANTS 23. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: Deciduous tree: alder Odmaple 0 aspen pfst other: 1-1 rt> 2©N A Evergreen tree: fir X' cedar R. pine other: H Em L o c k. 0. Shrubs Grass 0 Pasture 0 Crop/Grain Wet Soil Plants: 0 cattail 0 buttercup 0 bulrush 0 skunk cabbage 0 other: S t A Tr'A c N-Eb w ET-LA NJ t RE-Po 2 i, Water Plants: 0 water lily 0 eelgrass 0 milfoil 0 other: SEA iv Other: ' 24. What kind and amount of vegetation would be removed or altered? i- - - q R-E A P P R-ax 2 0 A1r-p012S b 3 t--t A P L G u s m-Ye-S TO C3 c R o t/Et . L. n , rt-b a2- s14 c.LE Nq Foe s , E L,NES. 25. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site: J4 oNt. -5- m. EVALUATION 26. Describe the proposed landscaping, use pf nature plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: w C P R •>E -C( SI Vc NA "Fs VE LA h-s scAPrN6/ LAeGE R_CC5 N7-7VE C2ASSES A-1 D ScHreK Qs. ANIMALS • 27. Check any birds and animals that be on ors obnserved • or near the site or are known tsite: Birds: 4 hawk zg heron 0 eagle 0 songbirds 0 other: SCA U Mammals: deer 0 bear 0 elk 0 beaver 6 other: ' A E3 a Cr A I S Fish: 0 bass 16.salmon 0 trout herring 0 shellfish 0 other: er, F+s H 28. List any threatened or endangered� species to be on or near the site: part Is the site a rt of a migration route? If so, how? • N 30. Describe proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: e, o t-o I Sr c'N c of t 2 Ac-s + D4 - o P ro THC W - LAND AHD uSrr,lc 4 6uFFCIz ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES 31. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, energyneeds? Describe whether it o would usedmeet completed would project's g be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.: w+l` ELeC � cj �fzot1 Pat 'er • otvE12 s t, t/+ L ' S • Ez- . n F -ri+c P 32, Would the project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent acent properties? If so, generally � describe the affect: ►.(o. 33. What kinds of energy conservation, features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 'vwE use- `nfhAt- PANC ' W a N D o l U S L o;•w Lo thi .. F t X l"u g_cs W TE?t- A n t o Fc ---TS rt ND C-A 2h F u t4 CIA 714-Elf- ,7r- a-C-K,7r-t •P i ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 34. Are there any environmental health hazards, • including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe the hazards: V ' -6- •e EVALUATION 35. Describe special emergenpy services that might be required: NONC , 36. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazar s, if any: NOISE 37. What types of noise exist in the area that may affect your project (traffic, equipment, operations)? 38. What types and levels of noise would be created by. or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (construction, traffic, operation)? Indicate what hours noise would come from this site: SItot2Tt TZYLr, ; conr STK.-Ccc;,oN Nets :-5 ; Lon/C Te -f9 : RES# OC).,TIAL A+tRAf4T �.folSc.S _ 39. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: g'-luFFC.r-n-s nN 4,Ns7rucflj EQ l pHt—ruT $ N D -c--4>I4 •ph—lc T Ac TiVir y • L!M i TLS •77) ' 4kr //:344g.S . 1 LAND AND SHORELINE USE 40. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? C i,/ e 7- N se is `Z T/1-4-02 A l-4OTELI MA2,NA ANL) or/E S i1CcE ! Atii y N c-W I-{-o frl t. S Li 2 2 o c< N I> hi l P(2o Pr--)27-y I S A Lc VA C-A NT. 41. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe the use: N o . 42. Describe any structures on the site: ONE Ncx/ $le-1 F4hICY HoNE A -✓p , LA2c, c • C_r, I Yzcieir Dii-/c CFcPi-tt')e AtcryNi [_ Pt-ANT�: 43. 'Will any structures be demolished? If so, what structures? •YE$, 7-4-e EA S-r wi F/ Pole-T/O,j dF THE Got-( MEre ciAL Quic pif`iC , 1 l 44. What is the current comprehensive plan or community .(t development plan designation of the site? Identify * �� theplan: _ ////!!II p CoC� f�l M EYZ C_I/-1 L / G/N K N o w e./ �l�l • ' 45. ' If applicable, what is the current Shoreline Master Program designation of the site? / 1.4 kr/ow,•/ 46. Has any part of the site been classified as an / "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify the part: GZN/cti/owT/ , Pere_MAP5 i--f-E WETZA�✓D ON TNS 1,10KT1-/ W EST- Go r? 4t1Z . 5 [-E- A-r7'Azi-Fct WETL4,.rD R-e'PoeT. -7- EVALUATION.' • `'. " 47. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? APP f 3 T1 tic ,A j b r�t�-� Tr MC 2 es r b�`r-s 4 - ALM ( " 48. Approximately how many people would the completed Sf� o N c project displace? 49. Describe proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if 50. Describe proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses • and plans, if any: £ 1-I o P c -rN IS e R o P os A (LODE$ A ' MC o ► '7-7-1 CoN/T1NuE11 L1 S e eF PSN SPACC T12t1c-S ALe,a4 lir SHoft.. Zi//E, HOUSING • 51. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether the housing ishigh, middle, dle, //.1(1 or low income: TRT o F 13L NI Z 2` H + DDLC /p/Ccrr-IC' 46 AR-C t41,4 D EYt o o, o 0 o) , 52. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether the housing is high, middle, or low income: 53. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control . housing impacts, if any: 'rN s P R- -re" /� FForpABc.C. IElJ N-0uS / C - T7FC GfLc DET/Sr NATt�r Z 'Tv POr PM A LLo,US THE y. e,c: PLA c-D AWAY F R-orl TMC /ro2c t///E. AESTHETICS 54. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including ding material(s) proposed?the principal exteriorbTr/6- Ex�S nNy � rJ CW I�u L'T7 - FA H�L t 9� ! 5 /4 �LC b r7-tt�YLS 14 L Di 14 TO (LE= A A 2 ls-rt,tLy o2 Z ST ( SE-T JNrDMIL 75A Nf"D. 55. What views in the immediate vicinity would be alte ed or obstructed? Cx #5 N C Vick)w y °Y 5 r,Ae Dogs 1` e7c PIA/,vr �A -Fa A c TS , 56. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: TZ€rt-c o J, Ti+t c A S al ,L D/ i-/� Wry( Wlrl� of THF Er-7( 7N 1344 ,L GqQ r pa(L q. i.A TZ E ic,---14) c� .. � V 2oADi F • rte GLc-oF1oL Looe' LIGHT AND GLARE 57, What type of light or glare would the proposal produce? What time of the day would it mainly 2A�i N D CSI b GTJTI A C. occur? CST' i T`s D A R k N_7N © Lc 2 / N WN-t-! �c s/ 14 e--a a r-1 D c-EV trL N/o CSA t_ PA-i141-0A•( L, 147-7 be a 58. Could light or glare from the finished project safety hazard or interfere with views? -8- • EVALUATION 59. What existing off-site sources pf light or glare may affect your proposal? /V w L. , 60. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: we Witt c-e S L Cj 2-ouN p LEV& PATHWAY LI r, x1T,A/r /KSTCA bF PA 2K/Nr LU-7- 'TYPE FCC 0A Li4• f/•TS , RECREATION 61. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? • 62. Would the proposed project displace any existing. recreational uses? If so, d scribe the displacement: o • 63. Describe the proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreational opportunities to be provided by the project or proponent, if any: TN r s P Fos 4 L /HC L L. D X 2 64-77 o N CEN Ems. i- 17-1-1 S ix PcoL/ ALi7-I AHp WoiK-ouT FACI LIVES . rT w /e-L P,E AaAlcAFSLr' ra c-0itri rNN, oK A NE-P-16C $H,f 8ASIS HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION 64. Are there any places or objects listed on or proposed for national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe them: THE Cxrs-r?He f3 lilt p/w(,' l-1As Nrs7'o(LrcAL- / HPo . TA ,JCE A5 7Ic F R AL cCI-I-oL PLAr7T. 1T HAS >?.t.r: N SlcNiF"/cANrLy r-obr F -c--b Tv A sNiS 4 h-ioTIi'=. 65. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, cultural, archaeological, or scientific importance known to be on or next to the site: THE. CANoE Pois/b aH T7-1e< / t4C.72 p1q5 E11$77)2,(A; C N 1_11.4 2 A Z I A 2 C_/-I e b L 415 r C A L. /t-1 F p i2 mAiu CE. T)-4 ¶ScTS, 8l.(5 C,C,NNC,L. IS I-1erzP,,•/y' lis W/TN 774-41- LA 44 -4LA ,' -1A4t Fob /1 Coi -i cLA rW p N 7 66. D se cribe propo es d measures oto reduce or control impacts, if any: Std A-r-nq c F-t c-r Pie 0 3- -c-r- Syf/ oPsiS , TRANSPORTATION 67. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe the proposed access to the ' existing street system. Show on the site plan. ,TE- I5 1)i ZTi 1 SEYZUE'A B ( AL coitoe_ Laois (7-4),A1)) W i-l-,C H r S S[7L j j B r /l r=Zv L`� rr�PI o '&�D sTA-re 12cte-r //b , ( oLD FLAt LE-)2 2oAD,) . 68. Is the site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest' transit stop? N/o / U N /C N o -9- EVALUA7ni , . 69. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 2-14. woutI> Nor E=2-itrt,HAr ANY Ime'Rc1.'L-1 og- 6-nYZ , e PA 4 is r nr c . 714,'Yt e es A “Au az col-, 70. Will the proposal require any new roads, streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe them, indicating whether they are public or private: YES , wE 'W I'-c EX-re-1'4 b T?+C /1-1 19 2 0 if 6---1-7 E—'T D F A L co No L LooP >ZoA-0 AND ADD AN /N7 1? NAI- P(t v11 Caq Au;/ '( S f Sm--P-1 71. Will the project use water, rail, or air transportation, or occur in the immediate vicinity of these facilities? If so, generally describe the use: -n+e'1Z E Is A n( EX i S-7-7 14 C N A-t2 r N 4 „ AT TN r 5 , ra- , • 72. How many vehicular trips cPe If knownday ldindid be �ate when enerated by the completed projet peak volumes would occur; s L--' AT vaC NSD -MA e 02-T 73. , Describe proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: we A R-C / 1'1 PRcv: rtr AC c-0ihnL Looe 241-4-0. PUBLIC SERVICES 74. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (fire protection, police protection, health care, schools)? If so, generally describe the results: W E A N-r t c i PATE- -r-Fl-c- �X i s7_i r/ Se.-nUILcs --rz> e,ET Ai) EQi4A . 75. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: /4oNE. , 1 UTILITIES , 76. Check which utilities are currently available at the site• awater electricity 0 natural gas refuse service g telephone e; septic system 0 sanitary sewer 0 other: 77. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity that might be needed: h t kT/1/17ES 1,4 Ci._ 14D1141 W A -g. A2 A L e by °ma5,--re ,/ ACL W E A A' fz A-r �r "r'z pee rii s5 t A '-' A'f►v IA c Sys? l l 'TO A C, fLNY' wA-re-rt 2� 1-1 i N ,M , Z' WZTe- .4Y AT (et f L 1 AC KNOWL•EIDGEMENT' the best I acknowledge that all information provided in this checklist tnandmaall loattached o hede itsdecision.material isotrUelaand ddcorrect tI outherbestdofhmy t knowledge.d I understand the lead agency is relying on this state, and reviewtropo SEPA does not ctutelautro approval(Check withpappropriate agencies to determine what approvalsearearequired.)icable SEPA ao the -Iproposal dsonhall enini op p Dya -{ ase. the information I have provided. If found inaccurate, approval could be withdrawn. — -- ---- 1© Al/q� .�`�' " (date) (authorized signature) -10- , I s . � , a h f i* _—, b ;OCia ■ Wetland Analysis • • Environmental Planning ■ • Regulatory Coordination • October 5, 1992 Ms. Rome Ventura 1215 Seneca Street Seattle, WA 98101 SUBJECT: Port Hadlock Wetland Delineation: Final Dear Rome: Enclosed is the final wetland report for the wetland located on the site at Port Hadlock in Jefferson County. Per your request lam enclosing four signed not included in our facsimileto you ies of the report, including the data sheets which were last week. Please let me know if we can be of any further assistance to you on this project Sincerely, ,.. 04.•\51....A,-,--4.----g-'421(1-0-- Dyanne M. Sheldon Principal DMS/bdg Enclosure ..®,`— ITEM -_� Seattle,WA 98105 206 522.1214 Fax:522.3507 5031 University Way N.E. Seattle, 4 WETLAND DELINEATION Port Hadlock Inn Port Townsend Bay Jefferson County, Washington Prepared for: Alexander and Ventura 1215 Seneca Street Seattle, Washington 98101 Prepared by: Sheldon & Associates 5031 University Way NE, #5 Seattle, Washington 98105 October 5, 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 METHODOLOGY 1 Vegetation 1 Soils 3 Hydrology 2 Wetland Delineation 2 FINDINGS 2 General Site Characteristics 2 Wetland Characteristics 3 REGULATORY IMPLICATIONS 4 REFERENCES 6 APPENDIX A - DATA SHEETS APPENDIX B - PLANT SPECIES LIST APPENDIX C - ECOLOGY ESTUARINE WETLAND RATING CRITERIA INTRODUCTION A wetland delineation was conducted on the Port Hadlock Inn site on Port Townsend Bay in Jefferson County, Washington. The delineation was conducted by Dyanne Sheldon and Pesha Klein on September 23, 1992. METHODOLOGY The Unified Federal Methodology for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands (FICWD, 1989) was used for delineating wetlands. Wetlands are defined in the federal manual as follows: Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. The methodology for wetland delineation is based on three mandatory criteria: hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. Each of those parameters were sampled in each plot. Wetland plots were established and identified by number survey flagging tied around the wetland perimeter. Location of plots, which were approximately 0.01 acre (12-foot radius) in size, are correlated to the wetland flag numbers as noted on the surveyors map of the surveyed wetland. Data for each plot were recorded on field data sheets and is presented in Appendix A. Vegetation Hydrophytic vegetation consists of those plant species growing in water, or on soil or another substrate that at least periodically lacks oxygen. Percent areal coverage was estimated for each plant species present in the plot and dominant species were determined for each plot. The hydrophytic vegetation criteria is determined to be met when 50 percent or greater of the dominant species are hydrophytic based on the wetland plant species indicator status of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service rating (Reed, 1988). Plant species are identified using the plant key, Flora of the Pacific Northwest (Hitchcock and Cronquist, 1973). A partial list of observed flora from on site is provided within Appendix B. Soils Soils were sampled, using a hand held soil auger, to a depth of 18 inches and evaluated for hydric indicators. Hydric indicators include mottles, gleyed soils, and low chroma. Mottles are spots or blotches of contrasting color occurring within the soil matrix. Gleyed soils are predominantly neutral gray in color. Soil chroma, or 1 • color, was determined using a Munsell color chart (Kollmorgen Corporation, 1975). Soil characteristics are compared to SCS descriptions of mapped soils to either confirm the mapping or determine if an inclusion of another soil type is present. Soil test pit data were recorded on wetland field data sheets. Hydrology Direct observations of hydrology are often limited during the dry season. However, indicators may be present throughout the year which confirm the occurrence of saturation or inundation for periods of time adequate to satisfy criteria designated in FICWD (1989). Indicators include exposed muck, visible sediment deposits on substrate and plant surfaces, water-stained leaves, and hydric soil characteristics. In cases where both igiand hydric present, wetland hydrology is assumed tohydrophytoccur perc vethe Unifiedetaton Federal Methodolosoilsaregy (FICWD, 1989). Wetland Delineation Sampling results for the three criteria were analyzed to make a wetland determination for each plot. Based on the results of plot determinations and visual observation of site characteristics, an overall assessment of the area was conducted and the wetland boundary was located. The boundary was identified by attaching flagging to vegetation at approximately 20-foot intervals. The perimeter of the wetland was flagged with pink and black stripped survey flagging numbered SA1-1 through SAl-40. Wetland flagging started at the northwest corner of the wetland and proceeded south and east to the northeast corner of the wetland. The wetland boundary was to be surveyed by licensed professional surveyors. A map of the surveyed wetland edge should accompany this report under separate cover. FINDINGS General Site Conditions The wetland is located immediately south of the beach berm on the southwestern shore of Port Townsend Bay. It is an estuarine intertidal emergent marsh with an upper fringe of palustrine (freshwater) deciduous forested wetland as classified by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats (Cowardin, et al. 1979). 2 • Wetland Characteristics Casual observation would conclude that the limits of the wetland are determined by the limits of the saltmarsh; however, a portion of forested wetland from 15 to over 35 feet (approximately) in depth is present around the southern perimeter of the saltmarsh. The wetland edge along the northern edge is determined by the beach berm. High saltmarsh species such as saltgrass, gumweed (Grindelia integrifolia), and yarrow (Achillea millefolium) were present on the sandy berm. The major portion of the saltwater marsh community is dominated by a dense stand of seashore salt grass (Distichlis spicata) with Pacific silverweed (Potentilla pacifica) and seaside plantain (Plantago maritima) also present. The portions of the emergent marsh closer to the beach berm have an significant component of pickleweed (Salicornia virginica). Within the saltgrass portion of the wetland are several low pockets with standing water less than 6 inches in depth. The water and saturated substrates within these shallow pools is quite anerobic. Surrounding each of the pools is a perimeter stand of American threesquare (Scirpus americanus) which was standing dead. Few of the specimens appeared to have new growth or sprouts at the bases. Through the dead S. americanus, young fathen (Atriplex patula) was beginning to establish. The hydrology within the saltmarsh system has been altered historically. It is unclear what influence the historical alteration has on existing conditions. In an attempt to either drain the wetland or to allow more saltwater to enter the system, a ditch was cut through the beach berm. The beach berm has successfully closed itself and no direct surface flow of saltwater now enters the marsh. There is the potential of saltwater breaching over the beach berm during a winter high tide and storm event, or perhaps entering the marsh through the berm at high tides. Freshwater enters the wetland through an intermittent stream channel which , enters the wetland in the southwest corner. In the southeast corner of the wetland, saturation to the surface indicates the presence of springs from the sloping hillside above to the south. The soils within the saltmarsh are anerobic mucky silts to a depth of over 18 inches. The soils within the saltmarsh were saturated to the surface during our field reconnaissance which was conducted in pouring rain. The soils are mapped as Coastal Beach and Hoypus gravelly loams in the Jefferson County Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey (1975). According to field characteristics, the mapping is in error and the substrates more closely resemble Tidal Marsh soils as described within the soil survey. The freshwater deciduous forested wetland is characterized by an overstory of red alder(Alnus rubra), wild cherry(Prunus spp.), Scoulers willow(Salix scouleriana), 3 and some western crabapple (Pyrus (=Malus) fusca). Understory species included Nootka rose (Rosa nutkana), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis), red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa), Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis). Groundflora within the forested wetland was sparse, partially due to the season of the field work. Species still evident included false lily of the valley (Maianthemum dilatatum), water parsley (Oenanthe sarmentosa), and skunk cabbage (Lysichitum americanum). Portions of the freshwater wetland between the emergent saltmarsh and the closed canopy of the forested zone were characterized by dense, nearly impenetrable thickets of Nootka rose and salmonberry intertwined with Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor). Hydrology within the freshwater forested wetland was variable. In the central portion of the site, soils were moist at about 12 inches in depth. In the southeastern portion of the site, soils were saturated mucks to the surface. It should be assumed that in the spring growing season, soils within the identified wetland would likely be saturated to the surface throughout. Soils within the forested zone were black sandy silts, Munsell color 10YR2/1 (plot 1-22), to black saturated mucks, 10YR2/1 in the saturated spring zone. REGULATORY IMPLICATIONS The wetland falls under the regulatory authority of Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act which is administered by the Seattle District of the Corps of Engineers (COE). Because the wetland is associated with the tidal waters of Port Townsend Bay, any proposed alteration to the wetland by placing dredge or fill material or altering the bottom elevations would be subject to an Individual Permit from the COE. Placement of interpretive walkways, trails, or overlooks within the wetland may be subject to an Individual Permit which involves the review and comment by all applicable resource and regulatory agencies, the public, and the tribes. In addition to the Federal authority, the wetland is within Shoreline jurisdiction and would be subject to Jefferson County's Shoreline Master Program. The wetland and its buffer would likely be regulated by Jefferson County through the SEPA process, as the county currently has only a draft sensitive areas ordinance. Jefferson County uses the Department of Ecology's Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington (1992) to determine wetland ratings. Based on that system, the wetland would be rated as either a Category II or Category III: the rating determination cannot be made until the surveyed wetland boundary is used to calculate the wetland acreage. If the wetland is 1 acre or greater in size, it would be rated a II. If it is smaller than 1 acre, it would be rated a III. The Department of Ecology rating system methodology for estuarine systems is provided in Appendix C. 4 Based on the relatively intact condition of the upland forested buffer for most of the southern perimeter of the wetland, it is our recommendation that, where feasible, a buffer of upland forest of at least 100 feet be maintained around the wetland edge. On the eastern portion of the wetland, this buffer area has historically been cleared and converted to a gravel driveway surface. Within this zone, it may be reasonable to allow the buffer to be reduced to the remaining width between the surveyed wetland edge and the existing western edge of the gravel roadway. Depending upon the constraints of the remaining developable upland on the slight slope above (to the south) the wetland, it may be feasible to average the buffer width in that area to allow minor intrusions closer than 100 feet in some locations, and further back in others so that the overall buffer averages approximately 100 feet in width within the upland forested zone. The placement of a pedestrian only trail constructed of pervious material may be appropriate within the upper portions of the buffer zone. This would allow some visible access into the wetland without providing direct human intrusion into the marsh. There is a strong potential for providing excellent environmental interpretation along such a trail system. 5 REFERENCES Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. La Roe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Office of Biological Services, Fish and Wildlife Service, US Department of the Interior, FWS 1035-79/81. 103 pp. Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation (FICWD). 1989. Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. US Army Corps of Engineers, US Environmental Protection Agency, US Fish and Wildlife Service, 'and USDA Soil Conservation Service. Washington, D.C. Cooperative technical publication. 76 pp. plus appendices. Hitchcock, C.L. and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press. 730 pp. Kollmorgen Corporation. 1975. Munsell Soil Color Chart. Macbeth Division of Kollmorgen Corporation. Baltimore, Maryland. Reed, P.B., Jr. 1988. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9). US Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report. 88 (26.9). 89 pp. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1975. Soil Survey of Jefferson County, Washington. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1990. Washington Hydric Soil List. 6 APPENDIX A DATA SHEETS (data sheets will follow with hard copy in the mail) SHELDON & ASSOCIATES WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM ONSITE DETERMINATION ori ka ci6ock Client: PProject/Site: Field Investigator(s):0 Date: ci--/-14- County/City: -3e-C(trscr('Co' ' j Wetland #: Plant Community: VSS Plot #: Weikr, Methodology Used: LI,5) •,-.', A ri-fA 5'11tv ' (1 2q Cr'151-k-dekf VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species, Indicator Status,%Cover, Stratum Dominant Plant Species,Incicator Status,%Cover,Stratum 1. ' bu5 p2C1(i,L) FAC , ) 91'4 ji..) 6. c • 2. gOa PCr+ r / 1-•(9 ; 7. 3. 8. 4. 9. 5. 10. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 100 % Is the hydrophic vegetation criterion met? e 5 Rationale: Gyecd-er -40 t -5)(Y)." , +1.,t c,er: 0*( c; F,C1- SOILS SCS Series/Phase: 1A0'1,--- --• SCS Hydric List? nC) 'de Is the observed soil a Histosol? Depth Matrix Mottle Gley Texture 10`ik 10\1(.- C.:10 1,•10 cc Other hydric soil indicators: rY) Is the hydric soils criterion met? ,./-c Rationale: 101./..) chrCricL Comments: HYDROLOGY Is the area inundated?DO Depth of water: Is the soil saturated?r Depth to water: Other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met'? I Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the sample plot a wetland? vi,7 Rationale for jurisdictional decision: - ! Comments: SHELDON & ASSOCIATES WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM ONSITE DETERMINATION Client: Ven.-tura Por +tocIckr. K Project/Site: Field Investigator(s): D,She idcr) P le+wt Date: q-14-(-1 County/City:J (- c\ Cr.�i J Wetland #: I Plant Community: Dptand Vore5 f Plot #: ltelarc..) Flag #: I 8 Methodology Used: On ,rd €dc6a.i t;gc 1 r rvt , 111 q, mat l K�,, ° ;y t o,�s+ ��: (( air VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species, Indicator Status,%Cover,Stratumd Dominant Plant Species,Incator Status,%Cover,Stratum i ct _ 1. Pry nV 5 V!rGlr,!a , FAc ', 35% Tc` : . 6. i ^t :)n . tY,U r,`, F! L J,.• j`,"" 2. Alnuc f:it;r'L'k FAC ) 29% Trete. 7. 3. Cy aiGE FAC, SO% ;.)t 8. 4. R0`•k ne(>1 N d `3 '1') 9. 5. F0tt.5 > 'c}c:ivtl;S 1h,G ' /^ ;t' 10. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 5( % Is the hydrophic vegetation criterion met? ns? Rationale: LeS`, ci,770 Ss tai D <C . t , /(1' ,moi C� SOILS SCS Series/Phase: � pL13rage I b \cf,"` SCS Hydric List? n0 Is the observed soil a Histosol? tnc Depth Matrix Mottle Gley Texture IQ" I0Y2 /i_ (Ili r1r Sir' i;< Ifrt rt^ Other hydric soil indicators: r)C Is the hydric soils criterion met? n0 Rationale: 1_0( a lti Ghr(i1Y'ci Comments: HYDROLOGY Is the area inundated? r) Depth of water: Is the soil saturated?r Depth to water: Other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: r,!' Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? no Rationale: 7.% t>1 +' i ,.. ,+ , JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the sample plot a wetland? �v Rationale for jurisdictional decision: ;, Comments: SHELDON & ASSOCIATES WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM ONSITE DETERMINATION Client: A\e.x or Project/Site: Field Investigator(s): 6 S ' ('‘c. Date: ct In f County/City: 3 cl-Lrsoti CoWetland #: \ Plant Community: P55 \ Plot #: t_zZ - ati.d Flag #: \-ZZ : Methodology Used: \ %Q : VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species, Indicator Status, %Cover, Stratum Dominant Plant Species,Indicator Status,%Cover,Stratum 1. F..Oso_ v\,,.14-a"-c. ryS S r s �,�b 6. 2. A,..),^os)“.$. str Ng SSk \ ^10 7. 3. 0 .a» tc�vK Cosa 043 . z S%h 1 ^b 8. 4. ---K.c.1 s ��l40 \: 'r/aG zo6 S . wL 9. 5. s race✓,o5,a rilLS'h s1 r b 10. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: NS0/0 - Is the hydrophic vegetation criterion met? • e c s 0� o�Lui, 0,2,.‘,v . i� o f eos c. l r_c i Rationale: "TA- is �sr� d bae o� r� 1 hO/ �Qrti f'v t�ro�L. p o i2 im �.� t✓� �� i\ a �a1�ct�ito� b� 14 1JL l�.c�sca� sia c, SOILS SCS Series/Phase: +^ �s 0`1 P"i lr0.V-\1 SCS Hydric List? 1\0 Is the observed soil a Histosol? ✓^o Depth Matrix Mottle Gley Texture 10\( - zj t b��k s� y \ts Other hydric soil indicators: X11 t- .3- Q. \'S+� " 'e ^ *- Is the hydric soils criterion met? ye s Rationale: s'� co ;lto�.5 So .\ tom �a1 o ro\(0\P"'Comments: scs w�� aGtP2c1� error o� Si4c Sod`} -} C� 11 J JCC t-C.vtC C G��S k h\� v.�A'�-T �J'Q'LZ.✓�C�L `�Ll` J HYDROLOGY Is the area inundated? N° Depth of water: Is the soil saturated? des Depth to water: Other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? \le s Rationale: e e�e�cc so, \s 4e�ow \2 JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the sample plot a wetland? \le--; Rationale for jurisdictional decision: 3 Comments: SHELDON & ASSOCIATES WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM ONSITE DETERMINATION Client: A\Q. �4..k.rProject/Site: Field Investigator(s): dS ` e'K Date: 9(tiY(4 L County/City: e t�no�. fes`"`{'t Wetland #: Plant Community: -uf\A—A Plot #: Flag #: 1-ZZ Methodology Used: Q,,,,\‘,,,,e_ VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species, Indicator Status, % Cover, Stratum Dominant Plant Species,Incicator Status,%Cover,Stratum 1. AbC cs c ro f s - 33% co,0,11 6. 2. Prk ,s e��ar ;,°Ea n. 33°� 7. 3. Acce Nwceep��\�� �!}cy 33% c8. 4. e ,ti4r��. . . r.�� �. �� 3S4 1,„,4_,,,,No 9. 5. 10. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: 0 Is the hydrophic vegetation criterion met? TAD Rationale: \4 LCKhes s/241-c;�s SOILS SCS Series/Phase: t�ofP•,..s ��Q,it lac��wr SCS Hydric List? 1-k° Is the observed soil a Histosol? 1-\o Depth Matrix Mottle Gley Texture \oyZ3/`i �c�e,t no co\or �o�c� �pJr9.tsy c�q�e� fanoty S, lt1 Other hydric soil indicators: Is the hydric soils criterion met? �o Rationale: >ro Lo\or .� t Comments: HYDROLOGY Is the area inundated? t-ko Depth of water: Is the soil saturated? No Depth to water: Other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the sample plot a wetland? No AP Rationale for jurisdictional decision: Comments: SHELDON & ASSOCIATES WETLAND DELINEATION DATA FORM ONSITE DETERMINATION Client: {\\e-/Cc - k( Project/Site: Field Investigator(s): OS •P\'`- Date: 9(�4(91. County/City: 5 tC-Lrlo' Wetland #: Plant Community: E*z..Ev`^ Plot #: w •�L. Flag #: Nos - ce .l sa\�w�riL� Methodology Used: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species, Indicator Status, % Cover, Stratum Dominant Plant Species,Indicator Status,%Cover,Stratum 1. C\-\\�s 5r i=A-LvJ $o.% Vse_v-A0 6. 2. Po�c�.�.�\o ,ccdL . 0'6L I3 7. 3. 8. 4. 9. 5. 10. Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC: \t)-o 0/0 Is the hydrophic vegetation criterion met? ycs Rationale: \0" CSL o� � SOILS SCS Series/Phase: -Oy('MS SCS Hydric List? • ° Is the observed soil a Histosol? Depth Matrix Mottle Gley Texture cck•-t 45 Other hydric soil indicators: 0-,�r'°C `- Is the hydric soils criterion met? .j es Rationale: Comments: b,...> o, co\.0.r co—e.nnC‘'-L - Soy \S tMs�p�� p✓a�a J iY � 1 2r.ro1 HYDROLOGY Is the area inundated? y e-f Depth of water: Is the soil saturated? Depth to water: Other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation: Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? les Rationale: JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION AND RATIONALE Is the sample plot a wetland? `les Rationale for jurisdictional decision: Comments: 3 APPENDIX B PLANT SPECIES LIST The following list represents a partial list of the species observed on site during the field reconnaissance. Trees grand fir (Abies grandis) ni big-leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum) FAC red alder (Alnus rubra) FAC cherry (Prunus spp) western crabapple (Pyrus (=Malus) fusca) FAC+ Scoulers willow (Salix scouleriana) FAC willow (Salix spp.) Shrubs Indian plum (Oemleria cerasiformis) ni Nootka rose (Rosa nutkana) ni Himalayan blackberry (Rubus discolor) FACU- salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis) FAC red elderberry (Sambucus racemosa) FACU Herbs slough sedge (Carex obnupta) OBL fireweed (Epilobium angustifolia) skunk cabbage (Lysichitum americanum) OBL false lily of the valley (Maianthemum dilatatum) FACU- water parsley (Oenanthe sarmentosa) OBL sword fern (Polystichum munitum) ni youth-on-age (Tolmiea menziesii) FAC Saltmarsh Species bentgrass (Agrostis spp) yarrow fathen Douglas aster (Aster subspicatus) FACW seashore salt grass (Distichlis spicata) FACW grindelia seaside plantain (Plantago maritima) smartweed (Polyganum spp) Pacific silverweed (Potentilla pacifica) pickleweed (Salicornia virginica) OBL American threesquare (Scirpus americanus) OBL APPENDIX C APPENDIX C Q.3c. Estuarine wetlands. 3c1. Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park, or Educational, Environmental or Scientific Reserves designated under WAC 332-30-151? Yes: Category I No:go to 3c2. 3c2. Is the wetland >5 acres; Yes: Category I or is the wetland 1-5 acres; Yes:go to 3c3. or is the wetland < 1 acre? Yes:go to 3c4. 3c3 Does the wetland meet at least 3 of the following 4 criteria Yes: Category I - minimum existing evidence of human related disturbance such as diking No: Category II ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing or the presence of non-native plant specie (see guidance for definition); - surface water connection with tidal saltwater or tidal freshwater; - at least 75% of the wetland has a 100' buffer of ungrazed pasture, open water-, shrub or forest; - has at least 3 of the following features: low marsh; high marsh; tidal channels; lagoon(s); woody debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland. 3c4. Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 3c3. (above)? Yes: Category If No: Category III Q.3d. Eel Grass and Kelp Beds. 3d1. Are eel grass beds present? Yes: Category I 3d2 Arethere floating or non Floating kelp bed(s) present with No: go to 3d2. macro algal cover in the month of August or September? greater than SU Yes: Category I No: Category II Q.4 C<3tt;pry IIV wetlands 4.1 I the wetland: less than I acre and hydrologically isolated and. comprised of one vegetated cgctated class that is dominated (> 80% areal cover) by one species the list in ecies fromguidance p.18. Yes: Category IV 4.2 !, tt�c ��cti,rnd less than two acres No: go to 4.2 and, hydrologically isolated, and c,e,'et tted class, and > yi) ; ,,; areal cover is ani combination ofpi'cies from the list in guidance p.19. . Yes: Category IV I _ No: go to Q.5. 2t3 Department of Public Worcs .,� <,Y . _ , PORT TOWNSRND,WASHINGTON 98368 _- Alf 20'81385.2294 �_` '�; -77 S 8 � January 16 , 1985 `�` Triad Associates 71414 NE 128th St. Kirkland, WA 9 80 34 RE: Water System Old Alcohol Plant Resort Gentlemen: The water plan submitted for the above project is satisfactory. One set of your drawings is enclosed. Please send us a copy of the "As--Built" drawings when they are finished. Thanks , Very Truly Yours, Ted Stricklin, P.E. Public (forks Director TS/km Enc. LOG ITEM PROJECT SYNOPSIS OF CANOE COVE Successful real estate development is an art form that is rooted in balance. What one sees should look like it belongs where it is. This project seeks to achieve that balance. Canoe Cove will serve a wide variety of interests and activ- ities. All of its components are designed to complement each other while preserving the natural setting. PUBLIC ACCESS AND HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE. There are several historically important aspects to this project. What is visually most dominant is the existing building on the site which was the former Alcohol Plant. In its original state it had classic industrial era features like huge multi paned windows and hand tooled concrete columns and beams. It has since had its windows removed, stucco applied to the concrete and a red tile roof installed. We wish to restore the central building to its his- torically accurate appearance and remove the east wing. There are 3 primary reasons for removing the east wing. First, it has already been so modified and added to that we don't believe we can correctly restore it. Second, it is so large (5 stories tall) and out of scale for its location that it severely detracts from the rest of the site. Third, restoration is very expensive and the economics only support doing this work to the main build- ing which is the one that will be used by the public. This firm has done much restoration of historical buildings and we want to honor this buildings past as well. Another fascinating historical aspect of this site is the Canoe Pond or Tsetsibus site. We have begun our commemoration of this important site in the naming of this project. Invariably, people ask how we came to name this project Canoe Cove and we present them with a copy of the brochure provided by the Tsetsi- bus Heritage Council which pictorially and narratively describes the past. We have proposed that we be allowed to create a small viewing platform at the entrance to the canoe pond. On this platform there would be a permanent interpretive panel giving the history of the site. Leslie Lincoln has offered to coordinate with the Tsetsibus Heritage Council in reviewing the proposed language and photos to be used. The wetlands biologist has recommended that we remove the log that blocks the seaside en- trance to the pond so that the tide can once again flow into the pond and begin to restore it to its natural state. The public access to the marina breakwater has been closed since a storm damaged it in 1990. People still climb out there but it is a very dangerous situation. The permit to replace the LOG ITEM 7 11111111 -5 . ben issued and it will be the first thing we marina already has been do upon taking ownership. The project proposal sets aside a specific public easement pathway to the marina and provides for itslong term maintenance. We also expect to modify a few of the slips in order to establish a shell e is housuffse icient publicr the new �iOnterest E COVE ROWING CLUB. It appears that there in a small boat facility to warrant a place to store shells, canoes and kayaks. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE AMENITIES. There will be several public access amenities within the restored existing building. The existing restaurant will be redesignerecreat on center will be created on to accommodate the demand of the area and be reopened. A new the ground floor which will include a swimmingpool. This will wbasl. The upper be available to community use on a membership floors will become condominiums for artist' s living and working spaces . There is a large local population of artists who need versatile spaces where they can live, work and display their art. HOUSING ARCHITECTURE AND CONFIGURATION. The exterior design of of the cottagesand multifamily true divided ouildins is basically lite double hung windows, the century. ryy.. We willuse wide overhangs, horizontal wide board shiplap siding and stone bases and detailing. Within 3 years after completion, when the trees and landscaping have taken hold, this project should look like it ' s been there for decades. Illustrations have been pro- vided on a separate drawing. There are 3 types of housing configurations. The first is a single structure, one story, containing 2 units side by side. appearance will be of a single cottage style home. The second is a The secssingle structure, which is set into the existing one story tall on the hillside, making it a townhouse but only side units. The third is upper side. It also contains 2 side by a 3 story building set across the street on the south side e of Alcohol Loop Road. There will be 3 of these m set prices uild- ings which provide for the density necessary $100, 000 and cluster it away from the water and view side ofthe road. All of these units will have views. This builddinpgowill also have the turn of the century detailing architectural continuity throughout. OPEN SPACE AND MOSS. This proposal sets aside specific fic opeween space tracts in perpetuity including all of the canoe oiwet- land, the wetland buffer , the shoreline and the public corridors. We have requested permission to construct all of the roadways on the water side of Alcohol Loop Road using grasscrete instead of paving. We want to plant Irish Moss instead of grass f in the openings. This will eliminate the paved look of typical developments and instead provide a lush green ribbon of driving surface. It is also a great filtration system for heavy rains and roadway soils. We also will do the public roadway improve- ments adjacent to this property by paving the rest of Alcohol Loop Road. PARKING. We have located the bulk of the parking behind the multifamily buildings on the south side of Alcohol Loop Road. This keeps it out of sight and away from the water. We are also providing for some stalls along Alcohol Loop Road for both the restaurant and handicap access. WATER RECLAMATION. There is an existing community drainfield that has ample capacity to serve this project. We have however requested the Building Department to approve the plumbing of each unit with a "gray water" reclamation system. This means that the water from the showers, tubs, bathroom sinks and clothes washers all drain out of the home in a different plumbing line that does not go to the drainfield. Instead it goes to a filtered tank and is reused for irrigation of the landscaping at the root level. We believe that Canoe Cove manifests the principal intents of the recent Growth Management Act. It establishes the preser- vation of all the important natural features of this property and sets them aside for public enjoyment. It creates housing that is clustered and is the economic basis that supports the open space set asides. The housing is in a price range that includes many entry level units. The amenities of the site, both natural and created are used in a manner that interconnects private and public enjoyment. CANOE COVE OWNERSHIP/MAINTENANCE COVENANTS Canoe Cove is a planned Community which includes within its boundaries the following Mixed-use elements: RESIDENTIAL: A. Zero Lot Line attached single family residences B. Condominiums COMMERCIAL: A: Marina and Harbormaster Building B: Commercial condominiums which may include: a. Restaurant b. Health Club and Offices c. Artist' s Galleries The Canoe Cove Community (hereafter, "the Community") , including all owners and lessee ' s , will be governed by the Canoe Cove Homeowner' s Association (hereafter, "the Association") which will be formed by the Developer, Alexander & Ventura (hereafter, "the Developer") . The Association will set policy and provide for architectural continuity of the Community and will provide for the maintenance of all of the areas of the Community as outlined below: 1. The exteriors of all structures built within the Community, whether Residential or Commercial in Use, with the exception of the Marina. 2 . All Open Space Tracts. 3 . Four (4) private Roadways and their adjacent rights-of-way. 4 . All landscaping within the Community. 5. The Public Access easement to the Marina Breakwater. AA 6. The designated Utilities Easements for the purpose of proAl - viding water, sewer and other public utilities. The additional elements of the Community, Marina and Uplands are described as to their nature, use and maintenance below: OPEN SPACE TRACTS: Tracts "A" and "B" and "E" are designated as open space tracts and will be owned in common by the Homeowners and maintained by the Association. These open space tracts are dedicated to the Canoe Cove Community as open space and will , therefore, not be available for future development except for possible future recreational use. Utility easements on these tracts will be maintained by the Association. COMMUNITY DRAINFIELD: The existing drainfield which serves the Canoe Cove Community includes lots 2 thru 9 , block 7 , Bay View Addition, Tract "E" , and lots 36 through 40 of Irondale Acres Tracts. The Association will maintain the Community Drainfield in accordance with all applicable regulations and health depart- 1 LOG i 1 ment requirements and will maintain the utilities easements. In the event that an agreement is reached with Jefferson County Public Utility District ( "PUD") whereby the PUD operates and maintains the drainfield , the Association will continue to maintain the utilities easement for PUD access to the property. In the event that access to a public sewer system is made avail- able in the future, the Association and the Homeowners agree to pay the cost of connecting to the public sewer system and upon completion of sewer service to the Community, will abandon the Drainfield . All of the property constituting the Community Drainfield will be owned by the Developer except for Tract "E" which will remain dedicated to the Community as Open Space . Until the Drainfield is abandoned, all maintenance of roads and/or easements on all of the parcels included in the Drainfield will be the responsibility of the Homeowners and the Association. After the Drainfield is abandoned, the Homeowners and the Associ- ation will own and maintain the Tract "E" only. The Developer will own and maintain Lots 2 through 9, block 7, Bay View Addi- tion and Lots 36 through 40 of Irondale Acres Tract. TRACT "C": This tract is the Harbormaster Quarters and Shop and will be owned by the Developer with the right to sell part or all of it. That portion of the Public Access easement which crosses Tract "C" will be maintained by the Developer and/or the owner(s) of the Marina. TRACT "D": This tract extends the length of the shoreline at the edge of vegetation line and includes the Beach, all of the Tide- lands, including the submerged lands, and the aquatic leased lands. Additionally, it includes the Marina structures, pilings, piers, floats, headwalk and breakwater and any and all structures that constitute the Marina. The Marina is excluded from common ownership and will be owned by the Developer with full rights to assign or sell part or all of it. The Developer and/or the Marina owner (s) will maintain the Marina structures, pilings, piers, floats, headwalk and breakwater. The Developer and/or the Marina owner ( s ) will also maintain the Public Access right-of-way across the Marina to the breakwater. 2 CANOE COVE LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOG ITEM # .5 •t �.� \, by •�; . 901013001 -TAX 6 \ • eG�' .� , 1.00 0. $ I 3 \ A•�• • e2 g�s °�' ' • 3 r 3.42 Ch. ' • . . \\.. , `OT ! eZ I e.• c,h. I• .•'et.•• •. ,•q• . • � oN o° � d o° e I 9S• . i 4.03 Ch. 1 .. • • a N .e r a O ` . .1 0 — in o a 0 3 x1n x ' o • O O N D 01e- 5e- a' I- • ~ j 901013026 901014005 PO o GOVT LOt3 TAX 21 aad vN0 ai�M (LESS TAX 19, 1.40 0. o 0 a • 20,PTN 21,22- x a 4 • Q/ 0-• . 011- 01 ,24 928) 1.71o. ---____ 237.67 VII OAK ST, soo' OAK ST. J 1 • B 901121007 I 16 1 • 16 1 • • 2 Tx 23 1.38 0.8e 2 15 2 •15 2 2 7 3 14 1----- sow 3 14 3 6 Ise. so• 4 13 • 4 13 4 5 a 5 12 4 S ryo° Tx 24 ., 6_ II • 5 12 PINE ST. ` 0.68 0." 6 6 901122001 �. _ �i�'\,. • F-: I e » 1ss' Iso' 8 9t.Iss• / 8 o2 7 al c 90112'.06 _ YRTLE ST. 2 .:.0 Tx 22 Tx 21 Q 3 las' Iss 1 i6 1 '7: LOT / u 4 5 14i ;, 901121005 ©® p. © 15 • 2 Tx10 Tx 11 41 FIR ST. Ias'‘ �� ,' 3 14 < 3 G 4. 13 4� "..-5 I I I �^/. 4•'p 12 5 12 3 5 W • :,iii d6 � I , �� II > 6 8 9 a 8 9 m 8 • ST. ''.... F 1 16 o I N! Iii • 1 N Q • 04/C 2 15 m a 2 7 134Y4 3 ilk --3---1-e---- --1-e 6 4J 4 lit 4° - 4 EICP fl) 'lo 5 12 �s i 5 1 4 5 3 6 II � 6 i 7 10 7 10 I (I) s (2) 9= 9 8 9 3 ' 4 5 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 s. O o 0 vio o oF o• 06 oo 0 0 35 N •• NI N M N O) W z _ • 01 F- 1 g Obi F r fV a z • f, J ROOSEVELT ST. • J:. • ) 11; A\ LE ACRE 7 34 / Page 2 J PARCEL A. All that portion of Government Lot 3, West, W,M. , described as follows Section 1, Township 29 North, Range Beginning at the south 1/4 corner of thence South gg• 02. 26" East said Section 1 222. 26 feet, to the True Point of Beginning t along the South line of said .Section i thence Continuing South S9. 02 " 26" g of this described tract; t 27e co tonus East, along said South thence North 00' 09' line of Section thence North 65' 52 . 32R East, 663.04 feet thence South 75604 ' 04" West, 191. 66 feet thence South 09 , 4Meet, 100. 56 feet; of Beginning� g0• 32" West, 754, 21 feet, more or less, to the True Point TOGETHER WITH tidelands of Washington, situate nin the second class as property herein described; of, conveyed by the State of adjacent to, and abutting upon the EXCEPT all of Blue EXCEPT BueHeron point, a Condominium, and amendments thereof, recorded under Jefferson Counts 1' according thereto. Y Recording No. t33o 7301 Situate in the County of Jefferson, State of Washington, PARCEL B. • All that portion of Government Lot 3, Section i follows, , Township 29 North, Range 1 Welt, W.M. . described as Beginning at the South 1/4 • thence South 89' 02 ' corner of said Section i � tou26" East, along the South line of said a thence94.0feet,tto the True Point of Beginning of this described 1, Section 1, 237. 67 feet; 89 02 26" East, along Lractj thence North 00' said South Zine of said thence South 65' S2, 04" East. 973.61 feet thence South 00• West, 260.73 feet ofh enc s described tract; West, 863.04 fest • more or leas, to the True Point TOGTOGETHER WITH tidelands hin toneof the Second Claes, as conveyed by the Stat g situate in front of, adjacent to and herein described; abutting upon the State EXCEPT all of property EXCEPTaall Blue Heron Point, and amendmentsthereof. undero�eltexaon'Counra 1, according to the y Recording No, 337301 Situate in the County of Jeffer,eon, State of Washington. -continued. page 3 • r PARCEL C1 That portion of the East 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 12. the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Township29 North, Range 1 West, W•M• , described as follows Beginning at the Northeast corner of the above descr thence South, 200 feet; ibed thence West, 300 feet; Parcel= thence North, 200 feet; thence East, 300 feet to the Point of Beginning. situate- in the County of Jefferson, State of Washington. 9 n. PARCEL D, That portion of the East 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of t the Northeast 1/4 of Section 12 , Townships 29 North, he Northwest 1/4 of Range i west, W.H. , described as follows, Beginning at a point on the Fast line of said Tract,t, 200 feet South of the Northeast corner thereof] a` thence South, 196 feet; thence West, 150 feet; thence North, 196 feet; thence East, 150 feet to the True Point of Beginning. q nning, fi g Situate in the County of Jefferson. State of Washin ton 1 PARCEL Es • That portion of Government Lot 3, and of tidelands of the Second Class, as I conveyed by the State of Washington, Section 1, Township 29 9 North, Range 1 West, W.M. , describeQ as follow 8eginning at the Sot,theast corner of said Lot 3 thence North 89° 1 02 ' 26" west. a distance of 369. 71 feet, more or less, it the True Point of Beginning, 1 /4 corner of said Section � said point being 947. 36 feet Bast oftto thence North 00. 0g• 32" he South thence South 55° " East, a distance of 1,049. 70 feet; i thence South 72' 42 . 04" West,► 8. 92 feet; thence South , 65' 52 ' 04" distance of 194. 70 feet; thence South 00° West, 27. 43 feet; thence South gg• 09. 32" West, a distance of 973. 61 feet; . of Beginning; 02 ' 26" East, a distance of 215. 61 feet to thei True Point EXCEPT ,Blue Haran Condominium, Phase One. Situate in the County of Jefferson, State of Washington. -continued- Page 4 c PARCEL ri That portion of Government Lot 3, Section 3. Township 29 North, Range 1 West, W.M. , described as follows Beginning at the South 1/4 corner of said Section 1; thence South 89' 02 ' 26" East, along the South line of 222. 26 feet; said Section 1, thence North 00° 09 ' 32" East, 754. 21 feet; thence South 75° 04' 04" West, 115. 26 feet; thence North 82° 37' 56" West, 153. 12 feet1 thence North 49° 32 ' 56" West, 149. 13 feet; thence South 10° 18 ' 57" East, 850. 94 feet, more or le of Beginning; es, to the True point TOGETHER WITH tidelands of the Second Class as conveyed b the Washington, situate in front of, adjacent to, and abutting Stateof property herein described. g upon the Situate in the County of Jefferson, State of Washington. PARCEL G: Lots1. 2, and 3 1 Block 1 of Bay View Addition to Hadlock recorded in Volume 2 of Platt as per plat Washington. , page 47. records of Jefferson County, Situate in the County of Jefferson. State of Washington. • PARCEL Hi Lots 2 to 12, Block 7, 8a in Volume 2 of Platspage V7ew Addition to Hadlock, as per plat recorded � 47; EXCEPT County Road right of way,No, ag conveyed to Jefferson County by deed recorded under Auditor's Bi Washington. 155397, record of Jefferson County, Situate in the CountyofJefferson, State of Waehington. PARCEL I, Lots 35 through 40. zrondaie Acre Tracts, as of Plats, paQe 145, records of Jefferson Countyr plat recorded in Volume 2 Y, Washington. Situate 'L t gin the County of Jefferson, State of Washington. continued- //r'Page 6 PARCEL HI • All of Blue Heron Point, a Condominium, Phase 1, acco declaration thereof recorded under Jefferson County ecorto the and amendments thereto: my ReCQrding Ho, 337301 EXCEPT Unit 26, TOGETHER WITH 12. 5% of the common area appurtenant thereto of the above described property. Situate in the County of Jefferson, State of Washington. • • -Continued- • I ' CARLSON PROPERTY That portion of Government Lot 3 , and of tidelands of the second class as con- veyed .by the State of Washington a portion being in Section 1 and a portion being in Section 12 , all in Township 29 North, Range I West , W.N.. , described as follows : Beginning at the South Quarter corner of said Section 1 ; thence South 00° 30 ' 08" East along the East line of Government Lot 1 in said Section 12, 50. 00 feet; thence North 88° 57 ' 04" West 100 . 00 feet ; thence North 35 ° 38 40" West 653. 84 feet; thence North 35° 05 ' 05" East 484. 44 feet ; thence South 49° 32 ' 56" East 65 . 37 feet; thence South 10° 18 ' 57" East 850 . 94 feet: , more or less, to the true point of beginning; Situate in the County of Jefferson, State of Washington. r (4'.." A-71i zir finT 4.) -11--\ —139/A 90F�� �Q4 sy�p ‘.1}j u tHRO S`s The following is a list of the names, addresses and TITLE tax parcel numbers of the property owners within 300 OFFICES feet of the property description on the attached Port Angeles exhibit A. 402 S.Lincoln P.O.Box1316 Port Angeles,WA 98362 Marie Gunstone Broders Tax numbers: (206)457-0482 4503 Old Gardner Rd. 901-013-001 FAX:(206)457-0690 Port Townsend, WA 98368 901-122-001 & 901-013-026- Shelton 930 W.Railroad John G. Marshall Tax numbers: P.O.Box 327 1009 Vista Way 901-014-001 Shelton,WA 98584 (206)426-8288 Edmond, WA 98020 FAX:(206)427-8574 Scott & Linda Graebel Tax numbers: E. 14617 Olympic 901-014-004 ESCROW Spokane, WA 99216 OFFICES Barbara Arey Tax numbers: Port Angeles 9223: 3rd Ave. N.W. 901-121-003 402 S.Lincoln Seattle, WA 98117 P.O.Box 1316 Port Angeles,WA 98362 (206)452-9658 Charles D. Broders Tax Numbers: FAX:(206)457-0690 4503 Old Gardner Rd. 901-121-005 & Port Townsend, WA 98368 901-121-001 USequim Larry Nulf Tax numbers : 325 E.Washington P.O.Box 1810 P.O. Box 305 901-121-006 Sequim,WA 98382 Hadlock, WA 98339 (206)683-7281 (Bay View Addition to Hadlock) FAX:(206)683-3421 Charles C. Stewart Tax numbers: ❑Shelton P.O. Box 38 931-800-104, 930W.Railroad Hadlock, WA 98339 931-800-106, P.O.Box 327 931-800-108 & Shelton,WA 98584 931-800-203 (206)426-8288 FAX:(206)427-8574 Benmoor Enterprises Trust Organization 22773 Lapaix Tax numbers: ❑Belfair Grand Terrace, CA 92324 931-800-105, NE 23781 St.Hwy.3 931-800-204, Suite 104 P.O.Box 1920 931-800-205 & Belfair,WA 98528 931-800-607 (206)275-8620 FAX:(206)275-8617 Jeanne Sisneros Tax numbers: 211 Alcohol Loop Rd. 931-800-107 LOG TEM Hadlock, WA 98339 4\I LE COQ t1Cpo 71H3 HW ���`��' THROVG����CZ Page 2 of 3 TITLE i OFFICES Jeffery W. Johnson Tax numbers: CI Port Angeles 1906 Aurora Ave. N. 931-800-201, 402 S.Lincoln Seattle, WA 98109 931-800-202, P.O.Box 1316 931-800-801, Port Angeles,WA 98362 931-800-802 & (206)457-0482 931-800-803 FAX:(206)457-0690 Jefferson County - ❑Shelton Tax numbers: 931-800-206, 931-800-302, 931-800-601, 930 W.Railroad 931-800-603, 931-800-604, 931-800-605. & P.O.Box 327 . 931-800-905 Shelton,WA 98584 (206)426-8288 FAX:(206)427-8574 H.P. Brown Tax numbers: c/o F.T. Browne,..';Tr. 931-800-207 367 Slocum Rd. N. ESCROW Daltmouth, MA 02747 OFFICES Timothy J. Walker Tax number: ❑Port Angeles 17871 Quintana Ln.. 931-800-208 402 S.Lincoln Huntington.Beach, CA 92647 P.O.Box 1316 Port Angeles,WA 98362 (206)452-9658 Peter Walker Tax numbers: FAX:(206)457-0690 5812 Pinon Dr. 931-800-301 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 ❑Sequim William N. Stanley Tax numbers: 325 E.Washington P.O. Box Q73 P.O.Box 1810931-800-209 Sequim,WA 98382 Hadlock, WA 98339 931-800-210 (206)683-7281 FAX:(206)683-3421 Fred Marggraf, Jr. _Tax numbers: .20 Chimicum Creek Dr. 931-800-211 Shelton Hadlock, WA 98339 931-800-212 930 W.Railroad P.O.Box 327 Jeannette M. Wilson Tax numbers: Shelton.WA 98584 . 1707 Jackson 931-800-502 (206)426-8288 Port Townsend, WA 98368 931-800-503 FAX:(206)427-8574 Harvey J. Minnihan Co. Tax numbers: DBelfair 3659 Oak Bay Rd. 931-800-602 NE 23781 St.Hwy.3 Hadlock, WA 98339 Suite 104 P.O.Box 1920 Belfair,WA 98528 Kenneth I. McMillen Tax numbers: (206)275-8620 P,0.--Box 365 931-800-804 FAX:(206)275-8617 Hadlock, WA 98339 931-800-806 931-800-807 .. ,N,LE 6-4;\\\ _ _ 4.(,---. A---- -eo. - 0 132 ) p L, -1/121_1 -1 ( Q.1)(1-_-_ KnY � c syIp THRQ�G� Page 3 of 3 TITLE John R. Hansen OFFICES Tax numbers: P. O. Box 368 931-800-805 ❑Port Angeles Hadlock, WA 98339 402 S.Lincoln P.O.Box 1316 Fred W. Mcll Port Angeles,WA 98362 ro 5' Jr.• Tax numbers : (206)457-0482 18140 Marine View Dr. 931-800-903 FAX:(206)457-0690 Seattle, WA 98166 931-800-904 (Irondale Acre Tracts) ❑Shelton John Lynch 930 W.Railroad 2905 Rd. 97 Tax numbers: P.O.Box 327 962-700-003 Shelton,WA 98584 Pasco, -WA 99301 (206)426-8288 FAX:(206)427-8574 Jana Machin Tax numbers: 38 Fountain, 962-700-005 .San Francisco, CA 94114 ESCROW OFFICES Jacobsen Land Tax numbers: ❑Port Angeles P.O. Box 162 962-700-010 402 S.Lincoln Port Townsend, WA 98368' 962-700-040 P.O.Box 1316 962-700-046 Port Angeles.WA 98362 (206)452-9658 962-700-047 FAX:(206)457-0690 Jody S. Wood Tax numbers: 17267 10th Ave. N.W. 962-700-043 ❑Sequim Seattle, WA 98177 325 E.Washington P.O.Box 1810 Charles D. Broders Seguim,WA 98382 Tax numbers: (206)683-7281 4503 Old Gardner Rd. 966-000-101 FAX:(206)683-3421 Port .Townsend, WA 98368 966-000-201 966-000-801 Shelton 966-000-804- 930 W.Railroad Eugene K. Pickens P.O.Box 327 Tax numbers: Shelton.WA98584 1704- 129th S.E. 966-000-701 (206)426.8288 Renton, WA 98055 FAX:(206)427-8574 Jefferson County Tax numbers: Belfair 966-000-802 NE 23781 St.Hwy.3 966-000-803 Suite 104 P.O.Box 1920 Kenneth I. McMillen Tax numbers: Belfair,WA 98528 P.O. Box 365 (206)275-8620 Hadlock, 966-000-601 FAX:(206)275-8617WA 98339 901-013-001/901-122-001/901-013-026 931-800-104/931-800-106/931-800-108 931-800-203 MARIE GUNSTONE BRODERS 4503 OLD GARDNER ROAD CHARLES C STEWART PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368 P 0 BOX_ 38 HADLOCK WA -98339 901-014-001 931-800-105/931-800-204/931-800-205 931-800-607 JOHN G MARSHALL 1009 VISTA WAY BENMOOR ENTERPRISES TRUST ORGANIZATIOD EDMONDS WA 98020 22773 LAPAIX GRAND TERRACE CA 92324 901-014-004 931-800-107 SCOTT & LINDA GRAEBELI JEANNE SISNEROS E 14617 OLYMPIC 211 ALCOHOL LOOP ROAD SPOKANE WA 99216 HADLOCK WA 98339 901-121-003 931-800-201/931-800-202/931-800-801/ 931-800-802/931-800-803 BARBARA AREY 9223 3RD AVE NW JEFFERY W JOHNSON SEATTLE WA 98117 1906 AURORA AVE NORTH SEATTLE WA 98109 901-121-005/901-121-001 931-800-206/931-800-302/931-800-601 931-800-603/931-800-604/931-800-605 CHARLES D. BRODERS 931-800-905 4503 OLD GARDNER ROAD PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368 JEFFERSON COUNTY 901-121-006 931-800-207 LARRY NULF H P BROWN P 0 BOX 305 C/O F T BROWNE JR HADLOCK WA 98339 367 SLOCUM ROAD NORTH (BAY VIEW ADDITION TO HADLOCK) DALTMOUTH MA 02747 LOG ITE„ 931-800-208 931-800-804/931-800-806/931-800-807 TIMOTHY J WALKER KENNETH I MCMILLEN 17871 QUINTANA LANE P 0 BOX 3. 65 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647 HALDLOCK WA -98339 931-800-301 931-800-805 PETER WALKER JOHN R HA► _ � � [, 5812 PINON DRIVE PO -,BS 68 /i/ HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92649 HADDOCK WA 98339 931-800-209/931-800-210 931-800-903/931-800-904 WILLIAM N STANLEY FRED W MCILROY JR P 0 BOX 73 18140 MARINA VIEW DRIVE HADLOCK WA 98339 SEATTLE WA 98166 (IRONDALE ACRE TRACTS) 931-800-211/931-800-212 962-700-003 FRED MARGGRAF JR JOHN LYNCH 20 CHIMICUM CREEK DRIVE 2905 ROAD 97 HADLOCK WA 98339 PASCO WA 99301 931-800-501/931-800-503 963-700-005 JEANNETTE M WILSON JANA MACHIN 1707 JACKSON 38 FOUNTAIN PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94114 931-800-602 962-700-010/962-700-040/962-700-046 HARVEY J MINNIHAN CO - 962-700-047 3659 OAK BAY ROAD JACOBSEN LAND HADLOCK WA 98339 P 0 BOX 162 PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368 962-700-043 JODY S WOOD 17267 10TH AVE NW SEATTLE WA 98177 966-000-101/966-000-201/966-0.00-801 966-000-304 CHARLES D BRODERS 4503 OLD GARDNER ROAD PORT TOWNSEND WA 98368 966-000-701 EUGENE K PICKENS / 1704 129TH SE y,/ . ( s RENTON WA 98055 966-000-802/966-000-803 JEFFERSON COUNTY 966-000-601 KENNETH I MCMILLEN P 0 BOX 365 HADLOCK WA 98339 ROBERT LINGENBRINK 4590 NEWBERRY HILL ROAD NW SILVERDALE, WA 98383 V XNd 11 O-lr (coO).a.ro-In(wt)•.role 3'.,roww1.•I.wc wacl 3.clsll N13ovYvI 03rOtld K 'NolONN6YM 'A1Nno0 MOBU3di31' E.�n"}iIaA 1111111-! N. a • MKPW 1o1wwuw3u3 ypS ypS/ppy r '''i= ry od»n oum Sill )10010VH 1llOd 1V mise aP+�ma••r �m�s ' i: 313'0 b e«.: c:, wens.micas .m xa LIEXaa3 3a NW »..�.._.,...o►.t , w � o; Y 3n00 30NtJ0 P id . .,.� ^ a MO AS SNOISN3e 313'0 ON I svor+. 03N0530 Ofld / IV-Id dVNIW1-13?id 1 F e b A 1 1 F .111 maill _ J17 '‘i.; iii.......-/-, rl :r Iii virtiliorrelairr___INP,zirovag, i, ; i 7 lem- iketw ,,, 4--..\ twiritimw , 1,,i \\\\ VIIIITION, \ IL ',KV.v , %AAA: % \ ,p, fitw...;s.A...-w .....t.i.„, 144\‘# 4- A.. 1 111 .N•4N,„„..... ..-.2 1 ,i, c lac_ �Y?::. ♦ ‘0441-r `'r '1 ' \(!�A n1;i � � i�a A '���� 41 �' -' 'i \ 111 ir, virrirki fro., \‘‘: , „Aeo,., \ ..:,.:,,,i,,ii„.k___ tite: . ,,04," ,..k....., .,70,,-.4k N4711011 iii: -ill CL,..,-11 ,,......... , p z .4, -_, , ,„, ,„/„..„ ,,,,„.., ♦ : �,�olls„ � - ; k ANS. , .,,,„„ <4, .,z , 4 L. 1 1 Vii',. `(,41,[ ., • OrA ► \. �J , j .--,,,, -..* 4 t.,a,- --7..... 10 'il ''' -.., Is .,, 2 -- . ,,..1-- -4,-,e-v, mr..4111; A' ; 1 i! 1 Mill it4 ., NT_______,N sw,,.., ht40,.... \ ...I TWIN la li \ 11.0\,.. NOPir am „ 11 0-. - Ed 11-1 t + aa�` _ lit' ` �If_ e , 1�' ���� :�.,+r ,.*Ti ---"' �_ _ .. a� ��� wiMs • ". `�'! G 1111 VIII - - - IL, ,. lco...., _1 k 1t 7 ���_� F F I l � �' I J„Iy ,,k0,...t.........iiril VAIL,40.. '1' ‘1 -1M"A tall III ' 1.1 L ', w- - ., Ilk -.Area' . .' . 1"\I°IS\ Hyl ,�� Irt....s...: �._�:.._ -- \ IL-02 ti t ••-l� \`` PLT sou+ouer(PIXY Of Kws+svuq —. - 'tit \I��K, �k Iii r 1 111 \ ,k 1, 1 i� 11 \ 1 / „J A I .,' ;a xw mr-me(o)•aro-IL.(wc)•.crow vN roueNxx•I...i NMI 3N.i.0 NOJ. $IW YM 'AMMO NOYMidd7r _ _ M3DVNVIY'mod NNPW Pluwury•.u3 u� �1�0�4�/H ltlOd iv +tc (uo� B.In"�uan ��.I�I,�'�i ---� uva � a Gul 1 Mn pua7 YC' TOrPo 9 1 171.E ... gip'•" E ■Y 3/ 00 3ONd0 » �13>s 9,=, xapuExajd ;�1, o„ �5 �-o—'-� w.nw y Iuw.ppgN)aNwd —war—wvtlp " to x..3 sno�su3a 3lva. SlIV130 3JVNIVLI0 Wa01S '8 OVoa - --e—aNOIS30 W and / iVid .l6VNIWI13dd 1 it m4 01.4 3.g € 6 g gie 7 5 q i Odd } Emmmj 1 § g Si,,„ N !I Wigigi OW !IkgRW 1 t' /' i 11 < IPS i ; 1 1 iAe1 4 § 16 P-Filsr0 i'mf4 V-WRI 1 0 8' ! 410 w ;1400 gi �a , _ 1 il% ;kgye ,!K InJb 104;* p 3 :" f6 . § N $$ v 3� Q ri03�= €_� Q< eg g gff 7I: d 1 3 W 1 i !eo N x 315 ,5 1; t < as ga4 Y § pl pl a -ig Ut (111RI; egg 'Epg 4r a 5 e 6g t'i s fit; �� !flirfj aa��0 glINs XgY a i 4g1 � 6S 7 N �. § y� I♦ _ n i v4 N n d °I _ _ N F 1 ail 6T VW 1 °off Jg a.°a�€ 8 a36 ; s g � • EjriZ j o a = /40i § Q g$ R yg H a ryw. c b6s a 4ii gilig • 34(�<� : aL11 0 i ' Ni n =ease e8 fie( Nv is t- ,1e; EPS 1 g ga a € $s akIXA te . a a : Iii ;s r iP 4 l § mg.eg ; 1' eg a4 i 0 € a l RI!gi , aa4 �I g .4h N=g A a "43 s� Ns ds s ore' _s : .,7 Ng3$ riu d ASAN.. R153 2 riA1 -1E AM ri4 : •1 arp 61a 61 1 1g1 �J $ i pn E 1i8 0 Z 0 ad 11 . 1-: R U /_ i1 e W SI i '� $ - �---1 ° . E CD III • rob ,1 , y °OIy t 1 'S / V :Ow 4 i�th , -t 1:91 I— LIU Jai Z L1.1 �rr . • . W I O fid 0. s�avn 1w1311 1 i W Y 40 s ! li! 1 g 3.: a g g5 ' -Q do Q�x €$ µ.. M esM� ,. g ! R iii 4 4111 ili a Ili ik Amito Lu �i_ a 1 X111n -11LI��I;p ! mom `ate ' ° i ' _ ��'��li► W s _ _ �`� NpMMa�wa�s ;aaa®anw 3 1if v ' ��� ����` 5 •!, \1 Q - � � �1�,'v, me 2 :41 g O \N _ IMiliktil '''' ! e�d➢D �� MM1 m 3 11.LAr (� ;o«•°•wy:e =� .ri I I uJ e zi 1Bti — ii 6 a:°° \ 0 co 'I ::11 1 ,,((1°,•.`4 , i°.,[]moo:INTI cc i 1— b30VVVI1 133rOdd 9 xrA wrr-1u WO 9.w-.WO•KW v.wwv•,.•nc wui 3N i1r11 71O1ONNSVM 'Ammo NOSN9d c/ pi.In'}TIan ���I�I��iwe.�am'3�vo N10LL mpwim'w°°ry 3 )1001CIVH 1!!Od 1V 1014,° o�m4••r m,••s r'1 u a3TOAdri ,w. 3n00 30Nd0 , n4,. 4,�q,Z, zapulexaiy ;1J D mva L au.w e...r...a H... ° ° d 03N01530 NO AB SNOISN3tl 31x0 0M and / lVid ,l?:IVNIW1-138d E----- s _____ ______ _ K 101 G1»N. s 10 ligo mi __.—.._ .._.. _ m I[1V1 o14n7 p .1..11......1.. .......................... .-,., ..1.1._11,.-,. _...............-111...._.1,,,._..,..... _,.....,..,,,_, ._...... _ _ O O -, .ix . _._..__ ____ r Ad „, O _______ __ .. __ __ ____ __ _ 8+ III1 10188 N _.,.. ,,._.__.___,_ __ _ NUNmI_N18 _ ... 4. 8aii'raaaa -.__ -.. -_-_. iu , _.. _ -_. s O pp pp + '., p V, Y H N _ O • d00,/ 8 8 LW QAD 8 o o 8 Y n 8 _ .............. Nit lYW Is. ...11. ..11,,._..,...,.,.v,,..,,__.._.._....... ,.,......,....,,__,..._,._....,,.,, .,..•.._....,_...__........_.—...,...-1..1.11... ..,.....,,._,.,,,,.. N rCin A ___ ,..,.—. -- _ - -— — .1._1--_... __ s ..11•.....11.—_ • .0 malimil W" ll d l' ,- o sw 1kr*,_ —.— n1 n _,,...,-...,gym,__ilii t0 i lii 8 ZZ CL CIEO ..._ ,._..._.._._1_._1._..._._...1_..__.._..1,_...._,_,_._...1.11 _ .... _.___ ,...,LA7A__-, O -A n �\.9 1 ra 0 roiL 0 ,_,._....,._ .._,.. ,_..........._ _.__.,,_.-,,._,.....,._.m_-_,__....._..___..,_... 11...11.,.,.,_._-....- o a �. .._—.. L.� \ uw v.- HK-VD OV NRK.VII MI \ O 1_1_._.1.1..,......_. ....111.1,, 1..11__1.. ...... ..... 44 ._._._......._......___.. ,._.... Fi \..__ W.P. [rA•nKOW MRK•KM OM »Z. -J _.. _- ... ,.rd B Veil 8 r tr.o•wr av -' .l- 8 _ ......_.._ __...—....._... -._ __._.._....�—.._,., .....,._ _ .-... ._ ... _... _._.....—. + 8 8 n 8 8 8 M 2 O Iid....14.9, I _ 8:10/11114....r 021d xve 19rc-us(WC)•9rw31x9(Goc)•rsoPt v.sww>t•wP.as wecl 3N 5911 7101DN�IBYM 'AlNf100 NOOtl3A3301 `I"eww'w �a r1 )1JO1avH 1!!Od 1V Pavro /9oz EZnivaA ��I'l'I'u 3,,„, N iA«n wm .Iioi9e m�tv..6 3m..e .zapu�Xaid aaia3la b WK�•�'S Pwl 3n 0 0 3 O N`d 0 >.�s a�9s gm :Jt�;; , N K y ey,..yau3 mu NMvlp i Q ./ iwu30ewW iaK°'d P N0530 V 04063 SMO5N33 3060 ON' ( '` -' m — — E — + and / IVid VNIWd 1132� NI� b =� I4 rov.KW 01., �N S'Y -- - ab$ z 8 _u u .-..._• - __333_3........_._. 3333. �. 61..'W ... J _3333. MI (V ._-- W '.'. I.JI_1 cn ro. vNi a n 4G84 +Paw ce __ .- _ otill at — + /5Y 8tO %/4-.12 NE \ilk CO _ — --— ---v N1 —V-11— 2 V.=7& _ .. u + _.......... 2 ZZ ..IP-A.. ,... •. .N9_at:111 �. CL. 8' f 8 — ti;. f : 30I _ _ _._ _. __ . Z NW ATH w -------.._,...,.W.....,.__ f!»/-of yl. b - ----_— ___ ----e'er + 0 "– ll - - — E N7/.Naw --,.,......._.,_.. ._� �.. ,......._...333,3_ ..,._..,,.,,.,...._._,,..., _..................__. ..._,....,,,,,,_._.Ye:L.e._.. ow.•of JV ... — _,. 33,3,3, _y:Y - - Scot + (` t IIII `Ga B dt , '- _____ _ nn 8 lib .. 0111.1,A317 w .. a ______ ..___.._ _ 333,,3,,_-.._ 3333.. _ 4ge...- ._.. .... .......�._ _____. - _.— 998x__ _ ___ _ .___ _: NWW $ 61 -- , < 9 n .__....._........._3333 _ i•'-- XV AlT.7 CO rymgOa w / SIM AP ill ■ 11 O 4 i.,..,...._—,33_,__, ' - 33,_,_....7,(1.__-_0/1........... $ Cg$ /Y }, M a ..__,....dF ...— -.,.,,_— ib$ r rw-AP, . A + / • — ILsr I 4931- Pa w • C „_.. . ............._ .....,L.i91AL.-�..3333 ,—._..,,.:,,.,...,,..,,.,,..... IYRG_3333 8 r._; 3333 .. 1 i w _. "06__ 4 8 . L14P O L•II_._� . v yr.Naw i t m �II ,,. ......,.,._,.,, 3---SI. %f w 333. ,,33 33.....................,_,,,,,.,.._. O ..II AUL NM N - O _ —.-.5___ ... ........._..—....__....._ ---........ ............._...,..., --„,..— —11:A.__ N_ p _3_. ...... ,.m, ...._...,,.. ._ ,.,...-......m....,,.._.,,._................... ~ LA➢ ._ 8 �-3_33--..�. —.—.._.—_�. `.,,,,.._ ...._......... ........._.,,-,3,333.,. _____.—_ r .—,__—......,...—_•--4--_33_3,33333 g ._..—_. _._._..._3333_. _._.._._.__..._--._...�tl....._ _............ 3__333 33_33_ ._—.... ...._„333_,__3..__. G.Tl.—. 6- 0 - ,.....,..., ...,_.............................. _333,,_,,,_,.........-...._,,,._.,,. -- ,......_....-........,•._,. !4904 0 ..-_ g -_. LIM n 1 .._...36tP .. .._...,....__.._._,.. 3333..._—.. i 99 u w09. I p /o g SOYi _ 333... _3333.. ...,.,.._.._. . .,_-_-.__,._ - 4114 8 �',$ _-- IRM.—. b tg roM-mmw mg 8+ N _..—..._M:l.:......._ g ..— 3_33_,__3 IL ill .. 3333-__ ,_.,....,... 0i. 5_............_.,._.._.,.__..___.___ 3_333.___----,_ Nit....._, g __,...__ _333,3 ._,,.._ _ ._ _ ,333,,,3_._ .._.____,,.sem._ 8 /rte-APa 4049 3333—,._........._..._..-.w_., _ y0 _ - .r,..........._--,-.........._. ............_..,_1..51._...9tiL....... + i h !Y I /�¢ _g ___ . _ _ . __ 149. + —____,,3_,33 ___.. _ Pam M a 2 ,...-. w 1 4343-AM w H 39393. S.OAS 43939-res w 0 8 —. — Jr. Y ..j .. _.. N mm 8, Q ______ ___.____ -_ _ , __—_— _, _C,K— 00_33 --. _5-- --.. _ . a __ z5 O 3 at S — i OM-- + ► ':MVP-AINw '.MK-An $1430.KM w 8 La 4 4x39-ml -- ,— .. ..--- : 1,1. • 1 .-OW-3333.. + _............ ' $ ,,...—.. ............. .,,.,,�,... �� VII.A317 au ;a ' Pm-Naw E Y39-9K Al 9339.on w iY ! on. 8 gig— E, , JIM-Al6w p 8 O 140 _,.__. . _ ,__._.__R39.k t w po p _ —.. 8 N n h e 2 a n N N N O+ w L - , ......... , r a LOVE-.(o> ww-its(coil•noes ro oV •w-w waxi In cw<< NOJ. $ 4SVM A±W OO N08f13A1 '_ a30V-n-'Foad ? nKDW�lwww�yvd )IOOIdVH 1MOd 1V TO1BO=7,19/DOSTm.s L In�uan Jg i�'l�ll. ..- vao b ' te U 0 N✓•+^5 C�'1 ]w+i6.avua6 9i I �J' .. /��'L mXJ3VO O »wI0u3W0 3A00 30Nd0 zapu�xaid N.Vao en $a r u-w v..••..ara s-rroi V i �..°4 on vz1 \/ NO AB SNO5V3a MVO'ON ��' WENN mN01S30 I F Ofld / lVid J.�IVNIWl-13eJd F 1 00 I�—'"""" . :1Es��.�:..�—�m. iiimamt. I , , , I , , , ,q 0111 \ `\\1 'vo VIOL**7-- ��i '�.E 0 ii iI it I ,r� `4'''• it....- ‘14C4r `. % ) ts S.,0 Vi.N. • *\ IV VV4P411-- MIMI ..iilk iviorigok „,,,,,,, 4/0141t. _ilk ri hi. 1 ,\ 1 1001 \ Z k'itilui , --,_\\%T(,...-Alttilia) ''\\ t lir \ ,,,,illop 401.v.126*,....... ....00.1g....H t , 1 ,`� '!t,,,w► �•.�- 4- "'411' jl S :II: , 1 per_ '''''''t., ‘'ICIII‘116 ' '''V'liVrAILO .471irtigro ifit !...vi ...c...., . ‹c ,o,(_ ,.,,,,,;-....,, .\\Sn'aiih,.-Mill0); ,,A* *At /.. Airl,. 1 1.01 I—1 / Z —1 40t ireto.,40t7ie,440004, , .. II i homi ,,,,,,,,,„ 'Non_ 40.4 .NIP. Asior, lit -1,, WI hi, 1 2 ,,,t,,,.,„,. „40, ir 4pliii, ...,., A... ,,:,. N Iv.44,41:,,,.,, ,,,,,4,14,140.,,,,,, ,,..,,,,„...6._ voimedr 1 NI '..\.. „, .._ - - � y0i � ' pierimmi 111 Cfil * 3 .i�—!lid g [ • ;:N.\--;:., ,-1,-,,-"N s---- • jottr„,-4. -- \+ 34 11 et i�'1����► 1= tiiJ1l03'J E ..*....... ..-"'-'-'-'''.- 11116;1,,,,s•L„,,1 a ' „iositi., :3,...„ vg,„,--46,-.. ....Lill :,, ,„ , 2 , Arir ..\:„\Ca,,,IIMILiw 11 ' '.. ..4,‘ ......- me) `qp (briL <i 'i, R t -II!orral lig � r It 1 1 :\ ` m \ VLA LBOUNOANV(PLAT W T OP NVSMLLL) NNN., -14011.11.01 a"_ a 4 Mai . hh l /'\ 1 ti I na 141K-we(vQ0.o.+a-ao(vx)•nwe r•7,APPI1•1.45 vgei 3N enu 71010NM8YM ',ammo N0883dA3f a3orNr�1 aaroae .plmw lnwwwM u3 dim 'e.zn}uan ,��'Ppc ..,.—... eu„w,d»n vum N 1Y011 lr toroety i m•�s ����� b � mowPw,S31r10� 3A03 ]ONV0 Awe 9,Zt zapu�xaid .,x rwvua oi t� ,a. •'"''''''''' .m mo d asur w.,a ..,—,...N. iwuwecuary ia.(..d •-• —•'•--a3481838 XJ�.F SNOSN3y 31v0 ON i I > ' 2l• :-.••.'- �_...... - � .,.0,1-•.'-.. n� ii�P l''V •,Q• ,"'");07'.""118.8 nn' lnp III , OIPP.".".CK 'V .`Yf II amu,,,',I N.I �• ''.::-.7•••:H � • ;„:%;;W:".°) _ -_ _-' �u, f,ll�lb,,,, �LIII I' \ ' ' n I„ .w �I,, °"' �I I - 4„,,y . i 7Alll'• 63 . CI 6.b II l'""'.i • (i" '; gg 11:1',,,i!� ' 1 ,, �!ri Gn "Iib,,, „ II'b, Ii d. gi •�•�pe '4 '” IIu, f',° „y!'�il,,,i, l��l, i( (\I � M'ill,fiJ�,I�lua � ll'I,�pl a �/ b ri".r,. Tf ° ll r �'” t yI, \ 1j1"Ill latl';!^b'li ,C 7,..._,,, ,61••••••,„....„‘',.'b•—• (—),..,- �t�� ' 1 „ I�gI .� q w, �`'` 111 -• .'�'. clik �1 :� i fam l+y II,,I 4” III y •/�/_\\ \ 111111 II'�,,,y \ \(yi,, II I1 ;li'I I[y,q/ /1,�� r , ,,,,, .•`4 VGi y ' �..!V, d J;il,"'' � \` 1111PII Ile �I�L Ilb ',p 1 •' , � 'i ,, ---R+„ ,. ,”.\, :44.„k„,„..1,,,,. l ii , . . m III • '•'••'co I, .^ "IV11 I' \ \\1j47 lylfp -.,� \,Y' �II��,I',�,i / '�'q!� i'3ir I - 11111 14 III ��3 ? ' j(,{ (i y " '� 1,„PI1 , v I'�1411 I1MIN 1 • ,� vv "II ,./'�. - II n \\, .� r\ \\!. " /'• „ \� /�' 1111 IIII 11 d r .!1, 11 II4I .. >:v'e j 4 ; ` \ \,,{' P IIP imp\\`,` a yuI II III • . . a ` 1 bl t ` `" IIIA P '"„".III 'I �`► \ o 4":;�ry,�/1'1W,�10.. 1 I— u� ''', ` .q 11��mn,n eoq \ \\I„a,l!IIyI PI / •/�'�Ix�- � „ ���,d 4 11,11".°'� °�i'A "p' ',,` jl .,,,,,, ,;„ Ily„IIIA r' , � 0 44,<„„ti II-.4c„..,..--_,,—� .��. � I b , ;.,,;\ \ III \\�+' �'NI 1 w, :IV �( y �Il �� 141 `II N ,4 �A WtI ' •_\ , \ � II1 —,.4SII ! all N '' .. 111, NI, .,,�, \\ 71�';u'.I' ,u ir.n1' ,u„ gg„_ ,11,01�!�„a �i I„ ,'ll,,,, ^ ,") „u '� „,,,„„,,,„,„.„:,,,..1.,i,,,,1aI Illi„,:,":7 H/ '}I''IOa' 6,a I 11 „ ....""imminl �.. SI,,,,,„ � � .. ,1„,1,,I,' ".:,Q!,„,;,,,1” 1_ I��JI,,,f a.I ��� il II a i 'p�0'n ft~T.�,^, Ib III' /.'/ �� �y/ \ Ps I ,,,,� ”II`m"I�Illlp'I 111 ",III,,� �„ `JR rIII ,II w� T� ilyl' �, / "pP ¢ " \.4,—.7,---. ."....r.--,—.. • ' A 11 a III„ L II ', •i,_.2%•1,1 - '41' l!l.,,,l `u� "ul����•••,?1 ,I'm,,,,{gan �''�• - • Y a C� :kg1 _�. ��,,,,,ii7la l„,�,,,,,,,, b 111'1;5 11�`l'..`z 4`”"H.$''y;,� 1 4>11, "t? 1:° '41141"k;,.... '1, �'1.$,,,,,,,,,UN J,,,,,,,, „,,,,,,,.,,, I I Ce IIIII M,,, y, / -�. '` . _ „,„lil'1 g,,,,.,1! l e Illi”"'I!!,,,II II •ie• .r g \,,� �- ', g viv. ,q_117--ii Falb i.i ^ J eh,Ra. i Q100:41:4)j • O 'Us 3'JH039 w � /.` III,1",i 1",i .,I LLJ CC o .�y. dl. ",II. w w a. YO ,"' 111j1 II ..,,, 161 - L.„,al!C;;;;���w6„, - Om ll "�rS, ,I,..,lf,„IIC"I„ _ IIII,.,SGSa Qi .,,,11 „yl,l 0,„•Q \ti 0 ff .�',,, p IIII I ., IIII, 411, n jk• •,1, a 111111IIIIrVI! w b`Y ,,..>r „.01116;'n" I II�..1" I a P Tp�, , �I,,,,Z” � 'li1' yl; ,” '� G 1� �1 a r gg '`�, ,u III 1111 III II. p i .41,„„.....•.„,........ ,• ,„„)......,:,:i:::...„ .I ~ "1�OW O f'1OHOO1Y p � 111 .�' ¢,,,1 _ .__�o ,,,,�,ICIu".,� o?'I' �. °ldrp ,dOGgXnLry1 Oi NleNSNLlL7 s 5 g ` 0—/ '_^^.•,--- A._ t.• E. 'Ill • LE ■ // a N 1, ••�• 1111,,,,11,,,,,,"!�Illl,"„ „„ �' lu s ,IL a l\ / : 8_—: — \ ),, RIV � �� 6 F.: Liiii it �' it __—,--- ;..",.- i"I . ' V ^ ' lit':1r 1'1)-----it 1{y IJ ' 9 cl L- ! N� II to4111:11111, iI F _€ sa egg a PTh li 8 1& 60 #fie 81 `1 a ls a.ii € J 5 z :silt 4k1 8 m 3 n o `� n tall ilal g i ill s11 it 1f1 g \7311/13y /7.-- 1'-'3c'e9R _ r' air fl)D t %vJ 19K-IL9(90L)•9119-IL9(19660•Kl1Po v.'.P.'1.•4..231 2921 0.GI.I I M3`JVNVII 103rOad 74olawrevf 'iuw.00 NOSU]X143 _ M.�PW l.id..n ra.3 )I'JOIOVH .LUOd iv +ac /1102 E.In4ua(, FITIO ji �.•.,.» 31v0 (fin 6'yuvold.n 9uo1 tOt96 4 s '•M4.9 11',!,1 03)0310 $ 6.0.0,...1 owns 4999911 stat .Z a u E X a ;J=.: ,. ..«r..�. .�P ..... , IN0 3A03ONVOP IV m 3WA53�0 T9.1 l..u'.6o.ory 10.10+. N0 AB 5X015032 31r0 ON and / IVid J.2JVNIW11]2dd 1"."11.'1 F I I I j 311031-.L :31905 I I CK� _((��= r I �.�.............•, =9 @lam 1 _ N IIIKY (.' 3;1\71 $ `� 1 lovas-.g rmnae 1x4•)1 .a I • rr(wwlrtn` r 9M I _J ../'4z9 •. ,_ Lrn� L i I yii O t�,�• t. • r I • .w r, j'•^ c� I .> , :1, b ' 4'41 1 --1 - . w� C'.' v: 1 III• I (?/ 44 44 I ..,. L.44 I :t. I .. 1 .. 1 I ."e:. - 90 Poo v..1'0Pes Pw w 1.3.0 I I I I I • I I i i I I PJ....le NM.o...r P No0«.PP. PP <' �''«"«" "P a= yam saws �_ 1 \v I I I I I I 1 « aP......... IX=n lim,Qpm .,^��. 1 ` I _I �a eoPs .P m...aro'w. n WOOF' f°P:n+.a«P .�.� \•• •" ••�•.-_.. ___ InmPPrV<+®r.wP 4«0 omS«P4 7601016 P mcg w«JCP.V4 uC{ �y etre+ d S pi PM .Iep�IPP/R«P a�e9 i 110•11.0 -}�• I O I I O V R I.wo N SII M r/wre�e aVm V�'� 11 lo Ivl I %Pal epi L_ _I-2_J 1 0 1• L -I L 0111.['... PAN INP:Oat,Pr ^ ..P 1.P P.tirw w.MO+..1 LoLeuer P woo ea Pow L_ _I_ ;;_ I I ilw,mva ice lxra.a ,Y2:a'.,P.. G'.: :' a..e.P P .w« ;-I_ 1' Ani '_ i eZ,Ir"+I."°.$"'e°'""u'+P.w�e.'p"'®p.. P.ar•ml.o .'q"Pq'ue. ., .N .P.. am I I rrR.7- _' I----I----I 4 ---+-- I 0... P"v M.M. .PI°`. ° a«P•.R 000.i p alM ITO VW II O .Gala. POI SWOP NON ProlOiftmaa p PO I I 'l I %'rye --.l- I I I -.w o 9�ev1 megaVrtelesar"ammai vs a,4'1 alas YIN1 ««P..PPPa..w.a.es«.P..9 ;r; 1 IIS,, I .. .. I I :: bat.P.w«01 NEI ar•Pa..w -_J L I J L -- F- - _ _ .....".......„,n4„.....4.4>PO ON >,res,.oOar=NON ff ..Pa mese.m a 44,19 e0i I I ::� I I I I - i 0.19«a.....•v.�001 J P saa as�a umadu�d Pu �wa.°a.,'.P.�«"' !Owe OWN c, 91.191 rr.4:.PP�"nPa.0 7 r 1 1 r-:i 5 _b ry2==.-j --- I I 44.04.,P+w WM*P 4000«.«.. ¢a«..�.1 ...... w P°':"°.+a�a+M'I..�I -- L ... I J I 7 .._ .0.a..�:° w"'..i=7":92"Z mel. I-- r _ P.P. _ .• PPP[ ... P»�«.,.w I 1 I 1 I I I ..�N..«P,p.9.a...Pe..wo~OP. .....P«0ua ev:"°'1."�'m 1 I I P am.P PC=.m ...PO 1.P.....eea 0 Ira www P P+gra --I L- _I_.t_J L_ _i__ _ I I F. I I s --i 1« Urin'.".':R P..a^.$°:'.Z"«w «a.4.�:..n..X9-r...--=...'°dw"'"atm • I -,--I-j•_•"I r---I- --1 1 .- .- -- -- w..PO 0 P.9.....r P M.0«.Wen «444 4 '°°*.,u _I I I i? I I I I I F. I '. Pel..-I-1-mo,rM Po I I I ---I----3 I•---+--- P 4444^ X.-::-...:z3.2•74,-M.-"Z «.w P....'".g lLi00e...9 e...'a"°.eta. .II I I [lam 1 I I I m .:.P .01+0n1>.9 0.. �oror -•I I-- ---I I•-... -- 1 I ., a- .. I 1 1-19 r _. o'`•« P�°..a n'.°b..e« I I T 1 I •. `IIS' I 1 l --y--_ ii 4220...0 op..ON,P,+.o«.P.w P k..'rwn 11,41.•v w j _ _ I i.. 240.1 1sa Peer% 4+4...33 P _- ,, I -,- Idry`r- I ", ..=°mP.w.,1'..00 cK=,V,P c:.P„".y' •,owd J L I J L-.',..;%"--1-_ I T +..+a ie...a.n 4400.,.P.. ,.PP'.r P 9.03«0 sorsa Weft es., oe 1 �1,4,b!,, Z- I -1 I I-- -+---4 a .434.0 P..w rams,0 woes«I.P.w 1 1w'.°1pPAo a .'.°"0 wP.041° tem.000 Peep r. i_J L "' I .ci^�4�a L I • 3:3iiF1- I I -- :: a.w�a ate««�.e:P 1252 «Ap mate le«..P P «olo Vi 0400 oma.« °°«"""m"r IMO PI SEWN -1 f- p1• - I - ..'.� I F---+- -- 9.N.P.P OM WONT P w�« P.w ..1.P 1.0.a x.Inel*Mel tem ...9 1 Ste. 8 � r-3.-J i CC ao S _'__._J L ••n. I - `---i--,,,-..:N-. 'c w,ie,.w.7°490.Pei p m.i v. .�°n "941.0. .2 Pa 20.1,oe�m.0asam 1 c 3°10 a i IIF -7 C I .,. Ire•asom P..e,Po.I'P A.es el a�1 • 1 .. 1 r---I--- I aV I 1:244.1 1"aO.P.`s,°.i PP Iw<a""w OI I I .. I I I .. 4 1 r-- ,T1---, nr..P..'a"P.�'"'"°"'.. .•m1 a I- I � 133 Yd 1 I c,4`' I «a.0,.Pa e.o mm1Owaaa.i. ova 22.x01 H E-,-F�j-- 1 F_'-1 I d`'_ F -+- -- «. P �t ...IN w�Pa.. ^a y maw ^1�.1.74 .4G., �i _Y_ 1 I 'II I I ,• �J - 4444 I I � .. 1 �. w '�"ao •r ..'� U __J L I - • a L_ 'VP { __ m .rt, P «"°4,aw P" '.'=s .%a _ r' I P•«.w.« o 0011.0 I0 Pa9« P+.w'ep40 y a' l r-1=-i---- r_- 113 avc 0133avd I i- -i---i 9a P..P+, .sa z�«-�: .� «0220 P..�P P 7 J L °II I I, J L_'D_ aamOd WON ° al=MN 11011.0.1 HOPPIND * ---1-- NOI1dItJOSdd 114931 wwaea>I 13 d 4i3Y0i4d00110440IIV1' 1y Mfr - - -�- -,w `.3 '1 B.ate I-->L._13.0 YSi t8 r 7338,7 - --\ -- I (�1Va/n as ou ' � ----�--- = - � ✓ r- I ;✓ I [ 1 l` S... .4-r I .I•;-• .'' ' \ •A / ' • \oP «.a.�.S.° NOS�?JV0 _ e I 0603 1001 WY.4 111 90116110-0 243 all.0 I1121,01 A110@40 p ale i4IXJ a0N10 ill '123319 al d0 a6 211 O WV BTCMJ NO 1R1 Nell L,2224 01110 UTC lit W611 V ON1V0a4 Qin✓.81Wfl1 til V 11011(91 11110E 21,191 OVQ1 9f01 NO 13191 11111 )00'13/11 3 13.7219. W 270'.2 XI 2019.1.1.4W.'X1.41 1991 6691')001 141099.0-0 AWN 0903 11•rnn r1.9a 01 0`9.0 O0A •'/' .4 210 1409.'0103 if?YJ1'YOlW 1641 9199910 le aaw33 a N.'0 2110 JOpv.N lex 1V 1100 a 1190 ill / NOWiIC C 9 21041.001 1110.90 V 133aVd •, I / M30911 11,14./VN3920 26/14 39119191 14.941.0 101711 attiNa13iti9OO 00 40621021.4312 93 �\ M(k60 o ii o 1990.90 a19VM Olga.0 021119 • 8 13021Vd ' �� 5 \ \ / 2991 m9 war 19101 s T 1171 L9 6201.600/91.101.1913e/20...3 Wd09999d 01 011900,7.011900,7.91rr'Yg9 ../.... V / ,9+70.60 011110 11.131 '1V110d0 291 0 •� ` 21314401 lex-0110 11#iL 2G1gA.0 J'V1pe 3 130 4Vd / �0 d 1191113. 9911111 6.140 111199.30 07111.01 9'0'Np19aQ4 V `' 391 90 21X3120 11101 .0 s ........... / Mp ,\1.9 oda 09 1111 191',3 01 Ca11JtJ'V 291104• 'J1 9994 119MQ,o9 o-w 9 Siva•L999 993709.0 KLC«91 ON � s 339$09 19101.0 9 J 01 9111 11.W111T9 3 TVIIC 9101 01 06,1900111 I VI OV / V ws 1119 101119111 • 1 79 aIle 101 299 111 10 964 (471191 TIME/02111 101 1991111 / 'JL 9661 (111101.11 a1 9$9 10 3a'Th / 911 9619.2 119 101 1119.UTW•�11 101 )' 11111 991.3. 11 101 11W.LLTW''WV 1p1 y 11 SI01 1911.11TV1 Jo SOWN 9431 2001 69033 2121 9.101 DV 9312 311/1 61W 9101 i 239401'W/01 I/ 9096 NDlbd•1609 'afP24 lam$H190 9219006311 09911 ,212016.60 1930.293 900 096 110163163•24 7411966 1.99$4$VOLTA IC Vall1101 I 3219103119