HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012 West End Natural Resources News (APRIL)Issue No. 3 April 2012
A publication of the North Pacific Coast Marine Resources Committee
(NPC MRC) and NPC Lead Entity for Salmon Recovery.
Inside:
Tsunami Debris
Update ..................pg. 4
Whale Spouts
Spotted ...................pg. 6
Gray Whale
Strandings ............pg. 8
Preparedness for
Oil Spills ................pg. 9
Coast Jobs Focus .....pg. 11
Volunteer for
Cleanup ..............pg. 12
Welcome to the
first of two West End
Natural Resources News
to be published during
the first half of 2012.
We hope you enjoy the
articles. If you would
like to receive future
editions by regular mail
or email please send a
request to tpokorny@
co.jefferson.wa.us.
The North Pacific
Coast Marine Resources
Committee (NPC
MRC) consists of citizen
and governmental
representatives from
across western Clallam
and Jefferson Counties. As part of the coast-
wide MRC program, the Washington Depart-
ment of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) approved
funding for seven projects put forward by the
committee this winter. All of the projects must
be completed by June 2012.
Seven Local Projects to be Funded by NPC MRC
Port Angeles student Loren Henry completes his Natural
Resources Senior Culminating Project monitoring beaches
for the Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary.
Photo: Dan Lieberman
Continues on page 3
Continues on page 2
Dedicated Partners
Work to Restore Lake
Ozette’s Threatened
Sockeye Runs
by Megan Morlock, NMFS Communication Staff
On the northwest rim of the Olympic Pen-
insula, the history of Lake Ozette tells a com-
pelling story in which a threatened population
of sockeye is being restored by dedicated part-
ners who refuse to let it go. Tens of thousands
of sockeye once returned to Lake Ozette annu-
ally, spawning on the lake’s beaches and rearing
in its pristine waters. However, pressures from
over fishing, timber harvest, road construction,
and stream clearing have altered the freshwater
ecosystem. The potential for residential and
agricultural development may further degrade
water quality and habitat, particularly beach
spawning habitat. In addition, the introduction
of non-native fish species to the watershed and
the rise in West Coast pinniped populations
subsequently increased the rate of predation on
Lake Ozette’s sockeye population. These collec-
tive pressures affected the reproductive success of
Lake Ozette sockeye and the population was un-
able to sustain itself from one generation to the
next. Once potentially exceeding 50,000 fish,
the numbers dipped into the hundreds, and in
1999 Lake Ozette sockeye was listed as a threat-
ened species under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA). The most current five-year average for
wild spawners is 2,679 sockeye salmon. Though
this is well below the recovery goal of 31,250
returning sockeye salmon, recovery progress is
being made.
The sockeye’s collapse spurred a coalition
of concerned agencies and citizens, known as
the Lake Ozette Sockeye Steering Committee,
2 — NPC MRC
To achieve these biological and cultural goals, partners
have taken the recovery plan from words to action, by devel-
opment of an Implementation Plan. Through the work of
the Lake Ozette Sockeye Steering Committee, the recovery
plan is therefore coming to life in several key areas, includ-
ing habitat restoration and scientific research. Some example
recovery actions include:
t.BLBI5SJCBMCJPMPHJTUTDPOUJOVFUPNPOJUPSXBUFSRVBM-
ity in tributary streams and collect survival data by trapping
juvenile sockeye migrants at a weir in the outlet of the lake;
t*NQMFNFOUBUJPOPGBOEJNQSPWFNFOUTJOUIF.BLBI
Tribe’s Umbrella Creek and Big River hatchery programs
continue to provide a genetic reserve for the
at-risk beach spawners, and has improved the
geographic distribution of the population by
establishing spawning in these tributaries;
t-PDBMDJUJ[FOTDPOUJOVFUPSFNPWFJOWB-
sive weeds along streams, such as knotweed, to
restore native vegetation and habitat complexity;
t/.'4BOE.BLBI5SJCF'JTIFSJFT.BO-
agement collected river otter scat between 1998
and 2003. Through visual and genetic identifi-
cation, the collected samples were analyzed to
determine river otter food habits. The analy-
sis documented monthly fluctuations of river
otter predation rates on juvenile and adult
salmon, with special emphasis on predation rates
of adult Lake Ozette sockeye. This analysis was
possible with financial support from the NPC
MRC. The results of the analysis will inform
and guide predation management strategies in
the future;
t0MZNQJD/BUJPOBM1BSLJTNBOBHJOHëTIFS-
ies in the lake to reduce the risk of incidentally
A promising future for Lake Ozette sockeye. Photo: NPC MRC archives
A giant spruce flirts with the Ozette River. Photo: NPC MRC archives
to mobilize and address the biological and environmental fac-
tors impeding the population’s survival.
Members of the Lake Ozette Sockeye Steering Commit-
tee include representatives of local landowners and interested
citizens, Clallam County, Makah Tribe, Quileute Tribe,
Washington Coast Sustainable Salmon Partnership, Olympic
National Park, the Green Crow and Merrill & Ring timber
companies, Washington Governor’s Salmon Recovery Office,
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington
Department of Natural Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service, and the Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctu-
ary. When Lake Ozette sockeye became a federally protected
species, the Steering Committee was instrumental in assisting
the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to develop
a biologically sound recovery plan to guide recovery efforts.
NMFS adopted the Lake Ozette Sockeye Salmon Recovery
Plan in 2009.
The recovery plan provides a blueprint for sockeye
recovery, one that not only accounts for the biological needs
of the fish but the cultural value they provide to the region’s
people, including tribes. Recovering this run will mean much
more than restoring a healthy, self-sustaining population of
salmon. Of course reestablishing a vibrant and resilient run
of Lake Ozette sockeye is a core goal, yet just as significant
are the cultural traditions that surround these fish. Achiev-
ing recovery also means we are able to sustainably harvest
these fish to support traditional customs and engage in other
historical traditions.
NPC MRC — 3
catching sockeye and encouraging the removal of non-native
fish that prey on and compete with juvenile sockeye;
t*O%FDFNCFS
QBSUOFSTTUBSUFEDFOTVTJOHCFBDI
spawners using innovative sonar technology. This data will
help to improve estimates of population abundance and
distribution of beach spawners and will guide upcoming
recovery efforts;
t4JODF
GPSFTUMBOEPXOFSTIBWFJNQMFNFOUFE
stream protection rules (Road Management and Abandon-
ment Plan) designed to protect Lake Ozette sockeye and
meet Clean Water Act standards. Nearly 25 percent of cur-
rent timberlands are left unharvested to protect streams and
unstable slopes that could deliver sediment to streams;
t*O
UIF2VJMFVUF5SJCFDPOUSBDUFEXJUI
Rayonier, assisted by state (SRFB) grant funds, to build cross
drains in the Ozette watershed. These divert drainage from
ditches and roads back onto the forest floor;
t*OBMPOF
POFGPSFTUMBOEPXOFSJOWFTUFEPWFS
$100,000 fixing culverts and bridges and over $300,000 in
road surface maintenance to reduce sediment delivery to
streams; and
t"OFXPVUSFBDIDPNNJUUFFJTFYQMPSJOHDPNNVOJDB-
tions and educational opportunities to inform and engage the
public about Lake Ozette sockeye and how they can help the
species on their road to recovery.
Several challenges lie ahead for Lake Ozette sockeye
recovery. The Lake Ozette Sockeye Steering Committee con-
tinues to work diligently to identify on-the-ground actions
that will provide the greatest potential benefit to the sockeye
population. After identifying this critical queue of high value
recovery projects, securing project partners and sufficient
funds remains difficult during these uncertain economic
times. However, the dedication of individuals throughout the
Olympic Peninsula is our greatest asset. We have made sig-
nificant progress since the 1990s and there is no doubt that
such devotion to this cause will carry Lake Ozette sockeye
across the recovery threshold.
The Lake Ozette Sockeye Steering Committee welcomes
new participants and meets quarterly at the Community
Center in Sekiu. Meeting dates are noticed in local papers. To
learn more about Lake Ozette sockeye recovery and how to
get involved please visit:
The Lake Ozette Sockeye Recovery Plan: http://www.
nwr.noaa.gov/Salmon-Recovery-Planning/Recovery-Do-
mains/Puget-Sound/Lake-Ozette-Plan.cfm.
Washington Coast Sustainable Salmon Partnership:
http://www.wcssp.org.Lake Ozette sockeye spawning in the Big River. Photo: Caroline
Peterschmidt, former project biologist for the Makah Tribe
The NPC MRC is once again supporting the April beach
cleanup ($8000), two issues of this newsletter ($5000), and the
annual citizen science fair and potluck/bar-b-q (up to $850) as
well as science education for local elementary school communi-
ties through a partnership between the Feiro Marine Life Center,
Seattle Aquarium and the Olympic Coast National Marine
Sanctuary ($10,300).
New this year is a project sponsored by Daniel Lieberman,
Natural Resources teacher at the North Olympic Peninsula Skills
Center. The project is a feasibility study and proposal to the
Quillayute Valley School District to support the implementation
of student Senior Culminating Projects. These projects will con-
nect students with trained mentors in natural resources science
and foster understanding of the status of, and threats to, marine
resources ($3,223.60).
Also new this year, is a gap analysis of forage fish protection
in our coast’s oil spill response plan. Tami Pokorny of Jefferson
County Water Quality will gather existing information about the
presence of forage fish along the north coast and work towards
developing new partnerships and outreach events to address the
need for additional data. An important goal of the project is to
identify a pathway for updating the Washington Coast Geo-
graphic Response Plan with forage fish protections in the event
of an oil spill ($1500).
The final project to be funded by the NPC MRC is Phase
I of the Washington Working Coast project ($7,000). Read the
article “Jobs are Focus of Coast-wide MRC Project” on page 11
for more information.
Look for the announcement about future funding opportu-
nities in the July 2012-June 2013 time frame on page 10.
Seven Local Projects Continued from page 1
4 — NPC MRC
Japan Tsunami Marine Debris
(JTMD) Update
by Liam Antrim, Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary
In March 2011, the powerful Tōhoku earthquake off
the coast of Japan and the ensuing tsunami created a human
tragedy on an unconscionable scale. While recovery efforts
continue, scientists are forecasting how tsunami debris will
circulate across the Pacific and where some if it will likely
wash up on dry land.
The tsunami engulfed low lying areas along Japan’s east
coast. As it receded, massive quantities of materials were
carried into coastal waters. This was the stuff of everyday life
and the broken remains, large and small, of human develop-
ment – houses and lumber, cars and tires, boats and buoys,
contents of kitchen cupboards and closets, shipping contain-
ers and plastic pieces.
In waters surrounding Japan, a dense “debris field” was
tracked for days by satellite imagery and aerial photos until
materials sank, dispersed and blended with existing marine
debris circling the Pacific. Only a few items, including one
ship, have been spotted from ocean going vessels in recent
months. Yet interest and concerns about the fate and effects
of these materials persist.
A new acronym has emerged: JTMD refers to Japan
tsunami marine debris. JTMD remaining on the water
surface has been distributed by winds and ocean currents in
patterns predicted by well-tested computer models. Scientists
predict some of the debris that remains on the water surface
will reach shores of the Olympic Peninsula in 2013. Some
fast-travelling items have arrived already. But few who have
studied the issue expect a mass of JTMD large enough to
impact normal marine activity off our coast, and no experts
expect there to be radioactivity associated with the debris.
This article focuses on government agency responsibili-
ties and actions in the Pacific Northwest related to JTMD
and where to go for specific information or to report sight-
ings of various types of debris.
At the Federal Level two agencies have leadership roles
– the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Adminis-
tration’s Marine Debris Program (NOAA MDP) and U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Prevention, Outreach and Education
NOAA’s Marine Debris Program (http://marinedebris.
noaa.gov/welcome.html) is our nation’s lead agency address-
ing marine debris through education and outreach, research,
and funding for various removal and prevention projects. In
response to this issue, NOAA MDP developed a web page
focused on JTMD (http://marinedebris.noaa.gov/info/japan-
faqs.html) as a portal for information sharing, including a set
of “frequently asked questions.”
Debris Sightings
NOAA MDP has set up a central reporting mechanism
for significant debris sightings – DisasterDebris@noaa.gov
– where individuals can direct their observations from the
ocean and shores.
NOAA’s Marine Debris website.
Jefferson County citizen representative to the NPC MRC Chiggers
Stokes holds a float that may be linked to the Japan tsunami of March
2011. Photo: Ed Ansorg
NPC MRC — 5
Monitoring and Predicting Debris
NOAA’s oceanographic models are being used to pre-
dict the path of JTMD traversing the Pacific. NOAA MDP
has assumed a lead role in working with various agencies
to collect marine debris data and to develop regional as-
sessment and response frameworks, including one for
Washington. Groups or individuals may request NOAA
Marine Debris Program shoreline monitoring protocols at
MD.monitoring@noaa.gov.
Contaminants
EPA’s responsibility is focused on contaminants and
water quality, and their marine debris work focuses on
prevention, reduction and clean-up. EPA produces a JTMD
bulletin, which is available for download or subscription at
http://www.epa.gov/region9/marine-debris.
At the Washington State level, three agencies have key
responsibilities related to JTMD.
Coordination
Washington Department of Emergency Services serves
as a coordinator for information sharing and has assembled
a team from various state agencies to coordinate JTMD
response in a whole government team approach, which
includes state, federal, county and tribal representatives. One
result of this collaboration is a series of JTMD community
forums held in coastal communities in recent months.
Radioactive Materials
Washington Department of Health is the lead for
radioactive materials. There is unanimous expert opinion
The Joint Information Center website, a “one stop shop” for Japan
tsunami marine debris information.
that there is extremely low risk of radioactivity associated
with JTMD (see http://www.doh.wa.gov/ehp/rp/ and http://
marinedebris.noaa.gov/info/japanfaqs.html).
Hazardous Materials
Washington Department of Ecology has responsibility
for hazardous materials such as containers of fuels and chemi-
cals. Ecology will respond to reports of hazardous waste on
the shore and work to recover and dispose of these materials
in a safe manner. If you find a container that may contain
hazardous materials, call 1-800-OILS-911 9 (800-645-7911)
to provide information to Ecology.
Human Remains
In the unlikely event that human remains are encoun-
tered, note the location and call 911. Report the finding to
the county coroner and local law enforcement (Olympic
National Park, county or tribe).
Personal Effects
Contact the Consulate-General of Japan in Seattle
(http://www.seattle.us.emb-japan.go.jp) or Ph: (206) 682-
9107.
Learn More:
On March 13, the premier of British Columbia and the
governors of Oregon, Washington and California announced
that they will collaborate to manage potential marine debris.
The new Japan Tsunami Marine Debris Joint Information
Center is designed as a new “One-Stop Shop for Official
Public Information and Helpful Resources from Government
Agencies” (http://disasterdebris.wordpress.com).
Get the Marine Debris
Tracker App
The Marine Debris Tracker mobile
application, developed through a
NOAA partnership with the University
of Georgia, allows you to help make
a difference every time you walk the
beach by checking in whenever you find trash on our coast-
lines and you have cellular reception. You can easily track and
log marine debris items from a list of common debris items
found on the beach or in the water. The app records the debris
location through GPS and you can view the data on your
phone and submit to the Marine Debris Tracker Website for
viewing and download later (requires registration, which you
can do from the app). View it at http://www.marinedebris.
engr.uga.edu.
6 — NPC MRC
Whale Spouts Spotted
Along our Coast
Each spring, gray whales leave the shelter of the calv-
ing grounds in Baja California, Mexico and travel to their
summer feeding areas in the North Pacific. Their route gives
many Washington Coast residents and visitors a front row
seat to the spring migration. This is a great time of year to
grab a pair of binoculars and linger along our coast looking
for spouts. The Pacific Northwest Whale Trail, http://thewha-
letrail.org, singles out Cape Flattery and LaPush as prime
places to watch whales during the spring migration, but these
40+ foot long mammals can be seen from many additional
vantage points as well.
A large majority of the whales travelling through our area
at this time of year are within a mile off shore. By contrast,
the southward migration route is further offshore –18 miles
or more from land. In the spring, gray whales come quite
close in to feed, especially near Cape Alava and Kalaloch
Beach. Whales are also occasionally seen feeding in shallow
water in the Strait of Juan de Fuca between Neah Bay and
Bullman Beach. Many linger at First Beach near LaPush – to
feed on amphipods inhabiting the muddy bottom. Curious
animals sometimes have look around above the water’s sur-
face by orienting their bodies vertically and “spy hopping.”
Vessel-based watching
Another way to experience the gray whale migration, and
to potentially see other marine mammal species en route, is
by boat. Accessing the whale migration corridor directly re-
quires special care and an eye to the weather but can be very
rewarding. On calm spring days the numbers of gray whale
spouts visible offshore can be truly impressive.
Most of the gray whales will be determinedly travelling
north. They’ll surface to breathe and then often submerge
for up to several minutes at a time. Behaviors such as spy
hopping are typically less common out here than along the
beaches.
Dall’s porpoise and white-sided dolphin frequently ap-
proach boats to ride the bow wake. As summer progresses,
feeding humpback whales become more numerous. Killer,
and even sperm whales may also be spotted now and then. If
vessel-based gray whale watching interests you, inquire about
Photo taken in 2011 two kilometers SSW of La Push, WA. Photo: John Calambokidis/cascadiaresearch.org. Taken under NMFS Scientific Research
permits issued to Cascadia Research Collective.
NPC MRC — 7
Especially at this time of year, whales can come into
close contact with vessels, people and fishing gear. When
a person sees blows out on the water it’s a good reminder
to keep a close watch out for whales in the area, and
keep extra line and debris out of the water. All marine
mammals, including gray whales, are protected under
the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amend-
ed. New regulations also protect southern resident
killer whales in inland waters of Washington, east of the
entrance to the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The Be Whale
Wise campaign website, www.bewhalewise.org, explains
how these new regulations work and offers guidelines for
viewing all types of whales, porpoises and dolphins as
well as seals, sea lions and birds on shore.
Killer whale dancer Jonah Black at the 2012 Whale Welcome ceremony, LaPush.
Photo: Tami Pokorny
available tours in Neah Bay and
Westport.
Something to Celebrate
The whale migration is a cause
for celebration on many levels. The
Eastern North Pacific stock of gray
whales is a great example of the
recovery of an endangered species
and was removed from the U.S.
List of Endangered and Threatened
Wildlife in 1994. There are now
thought to be upwards of 26,000
animals! Their round trip migration
of 7,400-12,400 miles is believed to
be the longest of any mammal.
The Quileute Tribe honors
whales during a special ceremony
each spring. This year, the Whale
Welcome was held on March 30 at
First Beach in LaPush. The event
began with a traditional dance per-
formed by students at the Quileute
Tribal School. The dance com-
memorates the ancestral relationship between killer whales
and wolves and celebrates the tribe’s reverence for all spe-
cies of whales. Tribal elder Justin “Rio” Jaime greeted those
present and shared words of appreciation for the children’s
involvement in this traditional event and the deep connec-
tion between the Quileute people and whales. Two young
men, John Rush and Jonah Black, were designated to wade
into the frigid surf in order to present a gift of salmon as an
expression of goodwill.
The distinctive coloration and profile of a diving gray whale. Photo:
Annie B. Douglas/cascadiaresearch.org. Taken under NMFS Scientific
Research permits issued to Cascadia Research Collective.
8 — NPC MRC
Gray Whale Strandings
by Adrianne Akmajian, Makah Fisheries Management
Gray whales are often in poor body condition as they travel
north along our coast because little feeding occurs during the
migration south to Mexico or in winter breeding and calving
grounds. By early spring, much of the whales’ fat reserves have
been used up, so gray whale strandings on Washington beaches
are fairly common during this time.
In April of 2009, a subadult gray whale washed up dead in
Clallam County on the Makah Indian Reservation in a state of
advanced decomposition and was investigated by the Makah
Tribe’s Marine Mammal Stranding Network.
Over the past 10 years, a total of four dead gray whales have
been responded to on Clallam and Jefferson County beaches.
Public reporting of dead whales on the beach can be very
valuable to assessing the health and status of a population. For
example, in 1999 and 2000, increased reporting helped to docu-
ment an unusual mortality event in which large numbers of gray
whales stranded throughout their entire range, with more than
50 gray whales stranding on Washington and Oregon beaches
alone.
How do I know if a marine mammal on the beach is
stranded?
Not all marine mammals on the beach are stranded. Seals
and sea lions regularly use shoreline habitat and may spend
extended periods of time out of the water. They use this time
to rest and regulate their body temperature and can go without
food or water. A marine mammal is stranded if it is dead on
the beach or floating in the water or if it is alive and injured or
otherwise unable to return to the water or to its natural habitat.
What should I do if I find a live or dead marine
mammal on the beach?
Keep your distance – if possible, stay back 100 yards and
keep pets and children away. Live seals and sea lions on the
beach can be dangerous to both you and your pet. Additionally,
sick or dead marine mammals may carry zoonotic diseases that
can easily transfer to humans and pets. Federal
law prohibits harassing any marine mammal
including touching, feeding, or disturbing their
natural behavior.
You can help report live or dead stranded
marine mammals on the beach by contacting the
Northwest Region Marine Mammal Stranding
Network. Please take pictures of the animal and
collect as much information as you can about the
stranding including when and where you saw the
animal - date, time, and location - and a descrip-
tion of the animal - size, color, length of flippers,
size or shape of dorsal fin, and any noted injuries
or scavenging.
To report a stranding please call the North-
west Region Marine Mammal Stranding Net-
work at 1-800-853-1964 or visit http://www.nwr.
noaa.gov/Marine-Mammals/Stranding-Maps.
cfm to find the number for your local Clallam or
Jefferson County responder.
For more information about marine mammal strandings
in Washington State, please visit: http://www.nwr.noaa.gov/
Marine-Mammals/Stranding-Information.cfm.
Marine Mammal Stranding
Training Opportunity
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, along with part-
ners from the NW marine mammal stranding program,
will be holding a marine mammal stranding training
on June 15, 2012 in Forks, WA. If you are new to this
effort, this training will familiarize you with the marine
mammals species that most often strand on the outer
Washington coast and what to do when you encoun-
ter a stranded animal. If you are a past volunteer and
would like to get a refresher, this is a great opportunity.
For more information and to RSVP, write to Deanna_
Lynch@fws.gov.
NPC MRC — 9
by Liam Antrim, Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary
Despite deep concerns about marine debris, a large oil
spill would likely present the greatest threats to the marine
resources and habitats and marine-based economy of the
Olympic Peninsula. We carry memories of the 1989 Exxon-
Valdez disaster in Prince William Sound, or the Nestucca
(December 23, 1988) or Tenyo Maru (July 22, 1991) spills
that affected our coastline. More recently, the 2010 Deep-
water Horizon catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico reminded
us of the devastating natural resource and economic impacts
associated with large
volumes of oil being
released into marine
waters.
Much is under-
way in our region to
reduce this threat.
Professionals who
work on oil spills
consider four phases
of planning – pre-
vention, prepared-
ness, response, and
restoration. Vessel
traffic management
and a permanently
staged rescue tug in
Neah Bay to assist
vessels in distress off-
shore or in the Strait
are examples of
prevention measures.
Restoration mostly occurs after spill response is done, and it
is directed at reversing or mitigating the damages caused by a
spill. Other than being a citizen watchdog over government
functions, there is not much a local resident can do to help
with prevention and restoration.
Preparedness and response is where local citizens can
contribute most effectively. Being prepared means having
plans in place, having rapid access to spill response equip-
ment, and having people trained to use the equipment
properly and approach the incident safely. If there is a large
petroleum spill, state and federal response agencies will
depend on support from the local community, which means
that local and tribal communities can be an important part
of the national response system for our area. A petroleum
spill, however, can create a situation hazardous to human
safety and health. A cautious person might ask - Can this fuel
burst into flames? Is it safe to breathe these fumes? A first
responder needs to know how to avoid dangerous situations,
where the equipment is and how to use it. One basic class
all trained spill first responders are required to have is called
HAZWOPER (Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency
Response).
Ecology, the U.S. Coast Guard, ExxonMobil, Marine
Spill Response Corpora-
tion (MSRC), and NRC
Environmental Service
teamed up to offer free
HAZWOPER classes
in Neah Bay, Forks,
and Taholah during the
winter/spring of 2011
to bring this training
directly to the com-
munities where first
responders are needed,
and where people have
the most to lose from a
major oil spill. This year,
HAZWOPER trainings
will be offered the week
of June 26-29.
These classes are an
outreach effort of the
Northwest Area Com-
mittee, the multi-party
organization that coordinates oil spill prevention, prepared-
ness, response in the Washington, Oregon, and Idaho region
(see http://www.rrt10nwac.com). This training builds capac-
ity for outer coast residents, especially tribal members living
on the water, to more effectively protect natural resources
from spill impacts. Local response to the tank truck incident
near the Hoh River is a recent example of the value of this
training.
In addition, Ecology, the U.S. Coast Guard, Exxon-
Mobil, Marine Spill Response Corporation (MSRC), and
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife sponsored free
HAZWOPER classes in Sequim and Everett in 2011 that
focused on wildlife recovery and rehabilitation during a spill
incident. Approximately 140 volunteers attended these train-
ing sessions. Participants learned how to handle and clean
Oil in ocean water after the Nestucca oil spill, probably on an Olympic National Park
beach, 1988.
Improving Local Preparedness for Oil Spills
10 — NPC MRC
Apply Now
for Grants
The North Pacific Coast
Marine Resources Committee
(NPC MRC) is soliciting project
proposals to be completed on the
ground between July 2012 and
June 2013. PROPOSALS ARE
DUE May 11th, 2012.
Projects must be for marine
oriented research, education or
public outreach activities that
focus on the Washington State
outer coast between Cape Flat-
tery and Queets. Projects may
also engage the other Coastal
MRCs in a coast-wide effort.
Proposals may range from $500
to $20,000 and can stand alone
or be the match for a bigger proj-
ect. For more information please
contact Rich Osborne (contact
info on page 12).Hazwoper training. Photo courtesy of NOAA.
February 2011 fuel tanker accident on Hwy 101. Photo courtesy of WA Department of Ecology.
oiled wildlife effectively to give the
wildlife the best chance for sur-
vival and recovery. This year, two
oiled wildlife recovery classes will
be held in Port Angeles on June 2
and June 23. Watch www.clallam.
net/ccmrc for more informa-
tion. Refresher classes are offered
periodically in Port Angeles as
an annual training to maintain
qualifications for oiled wildlife
responders.
There will be additional op-
portunities to take HAZWOPER
classes in the future. The North-
west Area Committee plans to
continue offering these classes
each year to help local residents
and first responders maintain pre-
paredness and improve response
capacity on their home terri-
tory. For oil spills, investment in
prevention is a top priority, but it
is also critical to retain strength in
planning and preparedness to respond when a spill occurs.
NPC MRC — 11
A project to analyze our region’s marine resource-based
industries is in its planning phase. It’s one of two coast-
wide projects selected by the four coastal Marine Resources
Committees (MRCs) during the “MRC Summit” meetings
last fall. The second project addresses fishing-related marine
debris.
During Phase I of the project, staff at UW ONRC will
assemble existing studies of marine based sectors of the coast-
al economy and develop lists of marine-based businesses and
business leaders. If full funding for the project is obtained,
an “Assessment of Washington’s Working Coast” will be
developed to describe and quantify the jobs that are sustained
by our coast resources. The report will gage the importance
of these jobs to the local, regional, and state economies and
evaluate the regulatory environment.
According to a draft proposal developed by project advi-
sor Miranda Wecker of the ONRC and MRC participants,
City of Forks attorney Rod Fleck helps sort out coast-wide priorities at
the MRC Summit last fall. Photo: Tami Pokorny
SAVE THE DATE:
The 4th annual NPC MRC Citizen Science
Fair and Potluck/Bar-B-Q will be held June 16,
2012 at the beautiful new Forks High School.
Learn ways to get involved in hands-on projects
to protect our coast. Enjoy the food, music, pre-
sentations and conversation about our spectacular
part of the world. Family friendly! Five counties participate in the WA Dept. of Fish and Wildlife
Coastal MRC Program (http://wdfw.wa.gov/about/volunteer/mrc).
The NPC MRC was established through a partnership between
Clallam and Jefferson Counties.
Jobs are Focus of Coast-wide MRC Project
the University of Washington’s Olympic Natural Resources
Center could sponsor a class in the “Program on the Envi-
ronment” (POE) to create the assessment. Graduate students
would be engaged “in evaluating a range of factors important
to the sustainability of the marine based economy of the
coast: social, economic, legal and ecological.” The project
vision also includes an “economic summit” to bring together
the region’s marine resource-based industry leaders and to
present and discuss the assessment’s findings.
12 — NPC MRC
1RUWK3DFL¿F&RDVW
0DULQH5HVRXUFHV&RPPLWWHH
223 E. 4th Street #5
3Rrt $QJeOeV :$ 32
Printed on 30% Post Consumer Waste Recycled paper
Bagged marine debris collected from Hobuck Beach during a recent clean up
event. Photo: Tami Pokorny
Volunteer for the Annual Beach Cleanup
This spring, the annual beach cleanup will
be held on Saturday, April 21 along Washington’s
outer coast and in several places along the western
Strait. To participate, please register in advance at
the Washington CoastSavers website: coastsavers.
org.
The North Pacific Coast Marine Resources
Committee (NPC MRC) has supported the an-
nual cleanup in Clallam and Jefferson Counties
since 2009. This year, the MRC is contribut-
ing $8,000 towards project management, waste
disposal costs and supplies for the post cleanup
bar-b-q for volunteers. The Lyrid Meteor Shower
which will be in progress that same weekend ac-
cording to a “heads up” on the CoastSaver’s Face-
book page. If the sky is clear, enjoy the celestial
show from one of our newly cleaned beaches!
NPC MRC
Rich Osborne, Coordinator
Clallam County DCD
Natural Resources
223 E. 4th Street #5
Port Angeles, WA 98362
(360) 417-2569
rosborne@co.clallam.wa.us
Editor: Tami Pokorny
(360) 379-4498
tpokorny@co.jefferson.wa.us
Steve Allison (Hoh Tribe)
Katie Krueger (Quileute Tribe)
Dana Sarff (Makah Tribe)
Rod Fleck (City of Forks)
Tami Pokorny (Jefferson County)
Cathy Lear (Clallam County)
Roy Morris (Citizen 1, Clallam)
John Hunter (Citizen 3 Clallam)
John Richmond (Citizen 1, Jefferson)
Chiggers Stokes (Citizen 2, Jefferson)
Jill Silver (Citizen 3, Jefferson)
E&5:SS
1DtXrDO 5eVRXrFeV 1eLJhERr