HomeMy WebLinkAboutMLA17-00064 SEPA checklistRESPONSES TO ENVIRONMENT.49aw,IONS ON SEPA
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST: PARCEL # 5W291005
UPDATED 2014
Purpose of checklist.
Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization
or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental
impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal.
Instructions for applicants:hf M
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please
answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult
with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or
"does not apply" onl when you can explain why it does nota l and not when the answer is unknown.
You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate
answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-
making process.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal
or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your
answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impact.
Instructions for Lead Agencies:
Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to
evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse
impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to
make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is
responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:hI @M
For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable
parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please
completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or
site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead
agency may exclude (for non -projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements that do not
contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal.
A. background_1 111
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: bel
Parcel #502291005
2. Name of applicant:hf e
Steven P. and Marilyn F. Barnowe-Meyer
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 1 of 20
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:hf elpl
214 Pleasant Valley Road, Winlock, WA 98596, (360) 785-3425
4. Date checklist prepared:hf gj
September 6, 2017
5. Agency requesting checklist:hf @
Checklist not specifically requested by any agency.
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): hf elpl
Dry season 2018
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.hf @1
No
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal.hf @
The Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Template for Parcel# 502291005 (and the associated Supplemental
Answer Sheet — Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Template for Parcel 502291005 and the Construction
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans for Parcel # 502291005 - Supplemental Answer Sheet" ), the
"Habitat Management Plan for Parcel #502291005, Jefferson County, Washington" and the Geology
Hazard Assessment prepared by the Stratum Group.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.hj elpl
No
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
hf elpl
Jefferson County Conditional Administrative Use Permit, Shoreline Management Variance
Permit, Stormwater Management Permit, Residential Building Permit (including clearing and
grading, driveway and visitor parking area)
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size
of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to
describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this
page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project
description.)hf e
See Site Plan Map "A". The proposal is development of a single-family, two-bedroom residence (2,072
sq. ft. Main Area / 670 sq. ft. Garage / 1,012 sq. ft. covered / uncovered decks), a new driveway
constructed off an existing private easement road to access the residence and a new visitor parking /
turnaround area. Please see the Stormwater Calculation Worksheet for Parcel #502291005, for extent of
land disturbing activities, conversion of native vegetation, volumes of cut and fill, and stormwater
calculations - impervious surfaces. See attached Maps "A" and "E" for proposed positions and relative
size of these proposed improvements.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960)
May 2014
Page 2 of 20
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location
of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If
a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a
legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should
submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans
submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. JtPjPJ
The proposal is located within Parcel #502291005. The site address is 312403 Highway 101,
Brinnon, WA 98320. The property description is S29 T25 R2W Tax 18 & TL Tax E1 (9.85
Chs) (Less Ptn Tax 47). See Site Plan Map "A", Survey Plat Map "B", and Parcel Vicinity Map
I,C„
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site
(circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other:
See Map "A" or Map "E". Parcel #502291005 is dominated by slope features that remained following a
basalt rock quarry operation that occurred on this parcel starting in the mid-1960s and had ceased
prior to or by 1976. Cessation of the rock quarry operation left the following features on site: 1) a
narrow roadway / bench (accessed from and located below a deep through -cut on Highway 101),
accessing the top of the old quarry, 2) relatively thin topsoil horizons and relatively deep second soil
horizons of fractured basalt rock, 3) three moderate gradient "push" roads utilized by bulldozers to
push basalt rock products down to the shoreline and out into the tidelands for loading onto scows /
barges, 4) two relatively flat rock benches / former pit floors and 5) steep (50%+) to very steep (up to
and greater than 100%) rock pit faces or stable gravel talus sidecast between the benches. All
features listed above and found throughout the parcel, including the steep slopes and very steep,
exposed pillow basalt cliffs / pit faces are very stable, due to pillow basalt rock's resistance to
erosion and relatively high mechanical strength. There is also evidence of basalt boulder / cobble fill
previously pushed into the shoreline area between basalt shoreline cliffs during the former rock
quarry operations that is visible from the beach looking landward. The proposed building envelope is
relatively flat (flat to 12% slope). The proposed building envelope is located entirely on a safety bench
/ pit floor created during the former basalt rock quarry operation. The proposed visitor parking /
turnaround area is also located on the same gently sloped safety bench / pit floor (averaging 14%
slope). Proposed driveway transects steep to very steep slopes associated with sloped face of former
basalt rock quarry but with gentle to moderate slopes below.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Steepest slope within proposed building envelope: 12%; steepest slope within the proposed
visitor parking / turnaround area: 50%; and the steepest slope within proposed driveway
right -of -way: -100%. Steepest slope within the 3.17 acre parcel: >100%.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any
agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in
removing any of these soils.
The entirety of Parcel # 502291005 is located in area mapped by the USDA SCS as Olete-
Hoodsport (OpD) but natural soil conditions within the entire parcel were significantly
modified by the physical removal of overburden, much of the topsoil and commercial
quantities of rock excavation during a former rock quarry operation on the site. Four septic
reserve area soil hole logs (dated 7-20-94) from within the proposed building envelope
indicate a first horizon of a brownish tan sandy topsoil from a minimum 3 inches to a
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 3 of 20
maximum 10 inches in depth. The second horizon is brown fractured basalt, from a minimum
29 inches to a maximum 41 inches in depth. The third horizon is gray solid, seamed basalt
rock. The only soil log in the vicinity of (but not within) the proposed driveway area indicates
a first horizon of 20 inches of brownish tan sandy topsoil above a second horizon of solid,
seamed grey basalt rock. Six soil hole logs for a new septic reserve area (dated 10-20-16)
indicate a range of first horizon soil depths of between 9 to 24 inches of very gravelly to
extremely gravelly loamy sand / sandy loam, with a range of second horizon soil depths of
between 11 to 34 inches of fractured basalt, overlaying solid, seamed basalt.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe.
There are no surface indications or known history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity of any of
the proposed activities.
e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of
any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
The only purposes of the proposed excavation, filling and grading are 1) to provide vehicle
access to the proposed home site via driveway construction, 2) to grade and level the
proposed building site for foundation and home building activities associated with a
proposed single-family two bedroom home, and 3) for a visitor parking / turnaround area
adjacent to the proposed home site. The proposed total area of land disturbing activities is
approximately 8,565 square feet (see attached Stormwater Calculation Worksheet).
Approximate quantities of excavation / cut are 268 cubic yards (all basalt gravel / fines) and
approximate quantities of fill are 290 cubic yards (201 cubic yards of basalt gravel / fines,
89 cubic yards crushed rock). All 201 cubic yards of basalt fill are sourced on-site from the
268 cubic yards of proposed excavation / cut. The 67 cubic yards of excess excavation will
be used beneficially as pit -run maintenance surfacing material on an existing low gradient
easement road leading into and across nearby Parcel #502294002, also owned by the
proponents. The 89 cubic yards of crushed rock will be sourced from an as -yet unidentified
commercial quarry. The crushed rock is intended as a base course for the proposed
driveway, as surfacing for the visitor parking area / turnaround, and for ensuring proper
leveling of the proposed building site.
Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
Yes. As noted above, the proposed area of land disturbing activities is approximately 8,565
square feet (approximately 0.20 acres). One -hundred (100) conifer and deciduous trees
greater than or equal to 2" diameter at breast height (dbh), including their stumps and larger
roots, will be cleared from this acreage during these land disturbing activities. All of these
trees regenerated following the end of rock quarry operations starting in or subsequent to
1976. Most other ground -covering vegetation is moss and limited coverage of small perennial
plants. The planned areas of land disturbance on this site have shallow to very shallow
horizons of very to extremely gravelly and sandy soils, not prone to stormwater runoff or
sediment transport.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)?
The existing impervious surface area is 5,726 square feet (4.1 % of the total surface area of the site /
parcel, which 3.17 acres); the proposed new impervious surface area is 7,248 square feet (5.2% of the
total site), for a total of new plus existing impervious surface area of 12,974 square feet or 9.4% of the
total site. See attached Stormwater Calculation Worksheet.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 4 of 20
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:hI p.M
Please see the Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Template for Parcel # 502291005 — Project / Applicant
Name: Steven P. Barnowe-Meyer, the Supplemental Answer Sheet for the Stormwater Site Plan
Submittal Template for Parcel # 502291005 — Project / Applicant Name: Steven P. Barnowe-Meyer,
and Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans for Parcel # 502291005 — Supplemental
Answer Sheet for the proposed measures to reduce and control erosion or other impacts to the
earth.
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction,
operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and
give approximate quantities if known.
Minimal exhaust and dust from heavy equipment will be generated during land clearing, grading and
excavation activities (including driveway construction) and emissions from vehicular traffic associated
with single-family home building and occupancy. An indoor propane fireplace and a low -emission
outdoor wood fireplace are planned for the single-family residence.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe.
No known sources
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
Dust control during all facets of land clearing, etc. and single-family residence construction
will be accomplished with a garden hose. Following construction, all potential dust -
generating soil will be revegetated with native vegetation. All equipment and vehicles will
have standard emission control devices. Firewood generated from the land clearing will be
burned over time in the planned low -emission outdoor wood fireplace Branches, stumps
and other chippable materials will be chipped and blown / scattered on site as mulch,
rather than burned.
3. Water
a. Surface Water:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including
year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe
type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
See attached Maps "A", "C and "E". The parcel (including second class tidelands) abuts
Hood Canal and McDaniel Cove along a 650 ± feet of shoreline. There are no perennial
or seasonal freshwater streams, lakes, ponds or wetlands located on or in the immediate
vicinity of the parcel; several very small freshwater seep that surface through small
seams in a sloped pillow basalt rock shelf below ordinary high water line of Hood Canal
have been noted during the winter months. The nearest known typed stream to the
proposed development is McDonald Creek (a Type F stream), approximately 1,120 feet
(at its closest point) from the parcel. There is also an unclassified stream feature or not
field verified stream feature or a feature with no water type assigned located to the
southwest approximately 1,100 feet from the western boundary of Parcel #502291005.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
See attached Map "A" or Map "E". At its closest point, the proposed building envelope is 84 feet
from the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of Hood Canal and the proposed driveway leaves and
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 5 of 20
proceeds inland from an existing paved easement road approximately 72 feet from the OHWM of
McDaniel Cove. The entire proposed building envelope (and associated single-family residence)
falls within 160 feet of the OHWM of Hood Canal and the entire proposed driveway and visitor
parking / turnaround area falls within 175 feet of the OHWM of McDaniel Cove. The
aforementioned existing paved easement road, in addition to two existing single-family residences
on adjacent neighbors' parcels, are entirely located between the OHWM of McDaniel Cove and the
proposed driveway, proposed visitor parking / turnaround area and a portion of the proposed
building envelope.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed
from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of fill material.
No fill or dredge material will be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
The proposal will not require any new surface water withdrawals or diversions. The
parcel is connected to the Jefferson County Water District #2 water system.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
Per Emma Bolin Jefferson County DCD Assistant Planner, the proposed development is not
located in the FEMA flood zone.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
The proposal does not involve any planned discharges of waste materials to surface
waters. Also there is no direct connection of stormwater runoff to surface waters, under
existing or developed site hydrology. The potential exists for unintended discharge of
waste materials to surface waters but the applicant is firmly committed to prevention of
pollution (including discharge of waste materials) to state waters and protection of water
quality, including compliance with state water quality standards. The primary
components of the water quality control system for Parcel #502291005 are 1)
controlling the sources of potential pollution on the parcel by utilizing water quality -
based BMPs and 2) preservation (and restoration) of a high percentage of native forest
vegetation on the parcel to yield minimally altered hydrologic and water quality regimes,
on and adjacent to the parcel.
b. Ground Water:
1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so,
give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities
withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
The parcel is currently connected to (and the proposed single-family residence will be
connected to) the Jefferson County Water District #2 water system. No groundwater will
be withdrawn from a well on this parcel for drinking water or other purposes.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or
other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the
following chemicals... ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960)
May 2014
Page 6 of 20
number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
The proposed single-family residence will be connected to the existing two bedroom
septic system under Septic Permit # SEP94-00461. Attached is most recent "On-site
Wastewater Treatment System Inspection Report " for this septic system, inspection
date 10/16/2015.
c. Water runoff (including stormwater):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection
and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow?
Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.hf elpl
As noted previously, there are no perennial or seasonal freshwater streams, lakes, ponds or
wetlands located on or in the immediate vicinity of the parcel. The nearest known typed stream to
the proposed development is McDonald Creek, approximately 1,120 feet (at its closest point)
from the parcel. The existing impervious surface area is 5,726 square feet (4.1 % of the total
surface area of the site / parcel, which 3.17 acres); the proposed new impervious surface area is
7,248 square feet (5.2% of the total site), for a total of new plus existing impervious surface area of
12,974 square feet or 9.4% of the total site. See attached Stormwater Calculation Worksheet.
This site reliably infiltrates all the runoff from hard surfaces under current conditions and is
expected to do the same under developed conditions, due to the soil profiles and seamed basalt
bedrock that exist throughout the parcel, as well as the retention of mixed native forest cover that
will exist on approximately 85% of the site following development. All stormwater runoff from the
parcel is presumed to eventually seep or route into Hood Canal or McDaniel Cove.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.h( e
Waste materials could enter ground or surface waters during construction activities if
pollutants from such activities are not controlled. Waste materials could also enter such
waters from the planned driveway, visitor parking / turnarou.nd area and frVurel of the
septic system or the proposed propane tank.
3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If
so, describe.
No significant alteration of existing drainage patterns on or in the immediate vicinity of the
site are anticipated.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage
pattern impacts, if any:
Please see the attached documents:
the Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Template for Parcel #502291005 — Project /
Applicant Name: Steven P. Barnowe-Meyer,
» the Supplemental Answer Sheet for "Stormwater Site Plan Submittal Template
for Parcel #502291005 — Project / Applicant Name: Steven P. Barnowe-Meyer",
• the "Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans for Parcel # 502291005
- Supplemental Answer Sheet"
4. Plantshf pM
a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site:hf elpl
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960)
May 2014
Page 7 of 20
_;deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other (Pacific madrone, Oregon white oak,
Pacific dogwood, various native willow and cherry species)
_;'_evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other (western hemlock, Pacific yew, seaside
juniper)
_shrubs
^X_g rass
pasture
crop or grain
Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops.
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
–X—water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?hf e
Oblique aerial photograph from June 1977 shows that, except for individual trees or small pockets of
trees, the entirety of Parcel #502291005 was denuded of vegetation during the rock quarry operations
that occurred on this parcel starting in the mid-1960s and had ceased by 1976. Current on-site
vegetation appears to be the result of natural seeding / regeneration (subsequent to 1976) from
adjacent tree and brush sources, with only those areas with adequate remaining soils successfully
revegetating. A total of one -hundred (100) trees (both conifer and deciduous) greater than or equal to
2" dbh will be removed from within the proposed 8,565 square foot area of proposed land disturbance.
Only 28 of these 100 trees are greater or equal to 6" dbh, with the largest tree to be removed being 13"
dbh. Understory native and non-native shrubs, grasses and herbs / forbs will also be removed from
within the proposed land disturbance area.
c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. hel
There are no rare, threatened or endangered plant species known to be on or near the site. The only
remotely uncommon plant species known to exist onsite is Piperia elegans (hillside rein orchid), a
NatureServe G4 (Apparently Secure) species.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any:hf elpl
Nothing normally considered landscaping is proposed or planned for the site, however preservation,
restoration and enhancement of native vegetation / plant species within the existing forest and rocky
bald areas of the site is already underway, with more planned in the future. All non-native, invasive or
noxious shrub and brush species within these area are being (and will continue to be) systematically
removed and their seedbanks eliminated. These removals have already enhanced health, growth and
survival of existing native plants and trees onsite. The landowner is a professional forester with over 43
years of silvicultural experience, as well as an experienced native plant propagator. Approximately 80
native trees and shrubs and over 20 native perennial plants have been planted and survived onsite for
one or more complete growing seasons within these existing forest and rocky bald areas, with the
intent to enhance the wildlife habitat and diversity conditions of the parcel. Additional plantings and
seeding of native trees, shrubs, herbs / forbs and grasses are planned over the next three to five
years.
e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site.
There are no known occurrences of State Class A or Region 1 Class B noxious weeds on or
near the site. The following 2016 Jefferson County Selected Weeds from the B list do occur
or have been seen and controlled onsite:
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 8 of 20
Scotch broom (dense reproductive stands covered much of Parcel #502291005 at
the time of purchase by the current owners (November 2015), but the vast majority
of those plants were uprooted using a Pullerbear weed wrench and the plants / plant
parts disposed of via fire in small burn piles; new seedlings continue to germinate,
are being pulled up continuously before flower set and will continue to be eradicated
by pulling until the seedbank is depleted),
butterfly bush (occasionally seeds in from neighbor's landscaping and is pulled up)
The following Jefferson County "Weeds of Concern" do occur onsite and control measures
are occurring:
Himalayan blackberry,
■ oxeye daisy
English ivy
5. Animals
a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known
to be on or near the site. Examples include:hf e
birds: hawk, heron, bald eagle, songbirds, other: seagulls, diving ducks, hummingbirds,
corvids, band -tailed pigeon, belted kingfisher, turkey vulture
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: river otter, harbor seal, seal lion, Douglas
squirrel
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: plainfin midshipman, blackeye goby
b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.hf pm
The only known federally- or state -listed threatened or endangered (T&E) animal species
likely to occur in the immediately vicinity of Parcel #502291005 are the Hood Canal summer
chum, Puget Sound ESU chinook salmon, nearshore and deepwater rockfish, killer whales,
marbled murrelets, and northern spotted owl.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.hf elpl
Hood Canal is an obvious travel route for Hood Canal summer chum and Puget Sound ESU
chinook salmon.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:hf e
Preservation and enhancement of the existing native forest habitat, which will occupy
approximately 85% of the parcel following development, habitat restoration / rehabilitation on
the approximately 5% of the parcel not in native forest cover following development, primarily
utilizing native tree, shrub and herb / forb plantings and control of invasive non-native plant
species within the fish and wildlife habitat conservation area (FWHCA) / shoreline buffer
zones, as well as protection and maintenance of water quality.
e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site.
There are no invasive animal species known to be on or near the site.
6. Energy and natural resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet
the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc.hf e
The completed single-family home will be heated primarily by a propane fireplace and secondarily by
electric wall heaters. Electricity will be provided by Mason County PUD 1, from existing power poles
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960)
May 2014
Page 9 of 20
on site. Solar panels are intended to be incorporated in the initial home construction or subsequently.
A low -emission outdoor wood fireplace will constructed inside one of the covered deck areas.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?
If so, generally describe,hf elpl
The project will not affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:hf e
Energy-efficient windows, air leak control and efficient ventilation, energy-efficient water heating;
installation of solar electric equipment.
7. Environmental health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk
of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal?
If so, describe.hr e
1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses.
There has been no known contamination at the site from present or past uses.
2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development
and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines
located within the project area and in the vicinity.
There are no known existing hazardous chemicals / conditions located within the project
area or in the vicinity.
3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced
during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating
life of the project.
Propane is planned to be stored and used for heating of the completed single-family
home. Household chemicals will be used and stored during occupancy of the home
and family vehicles will use gasoline, oil, antifreeze and other potential hazardous
chemicals on site. EPA approved pesticides will also be used and stored on-site in
limited quantities.
4) Describe special emergency services that might be required on site.
No special emergency services are anticipated to be required.
5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
Good housekeeping: The owner will promptly repair or replace all leaking vehicle hoses,
valves, filters, etc. which could contaminate strormwater; recycle all oils, solvents, vehicle
batteries, etc. at recycle centers (and never dispose of such on-site); keep emergency spill
kits readily available on-site, inside the garage area;
Preventive maintenance: never wash vehicles on-site; only wash vehicles at commercial
carwashes; oil changes, vehicle maintenance (filter changes, etc.) will be performed at
commercial vendors, not on-site;
Petroleum product (motor oil, etc.), fertilizer and pesticide containers will be stored inside the
garage area and empty containers properly disposed of;
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014
Page 10 of 20
• Use of pesticides and forest chemicals will strictly adhere to label restrictions and
Washington Forest Practice rules;
• Spill prevention and cleanup: keep emergency spill kits available on-site and promptly report
any recordable quantity spill or any spill that has the potential to contaminate water to the
Department of Ecology and the U.S. Coast Guard.
b. Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example:
traffic, equipment, operation, other)?h[ elp]
Traffic along Highway 101 is the only noise of any significance that currently exists in the area but
such noise will have no effect on the proposed project.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi-
cate what hours noise would come from the site. JtpjpJ
During the short timeframe required to clear and construct the proposed driveway, to clear and level
the proposed building site and visitor parking / turnaround area and to dispose of branches, stumps,
etc. via grinding, noise from heavy equipment will be noticeable above current background noise
levels. Noise will also be generated during building construction (foundation work, framing, siding,
etc.) but such noise is not expected to be excessive and all work activities listed above will be
performed during daylight hours to minimize any negative effects on our neighbors.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: hel
As noted above, all noise -generating work activities will be performed during daylight hours to
minimize any negative effects on our neighbors.
8. Land and shoreline use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current
land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe.hf elpl
The current land use of Parcel #502291005 is "Vacant Land". The current land use on all adjacent
properties is "Residential — Single Unit" or "Vacant Land". The proposal will not affect current land
uses on nearby of adjacent properties.
b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe.
How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to
other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated,
how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or
nonforest use? hel
The project site has not been used as working farmland or working forest land in the past, although it
appears that timber was harvested from the parcel sometime during the 1960s. No agricultural or
forest land of long-term commercial significance or acreage under farmland or forest land tax status
will be converted to other use as a result of the proposal.
1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal
business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides,
tilling, and harvesting? If so, how:
No
c. Describe any structures on the site. hel
There are no structures currently on the site.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?hf elal
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014
Page 11 of 20
No
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?hf elpl
Rural Residential 1:5. Except for Parcel # 502294001 (to the north of this site), all adjacent properties
are also classified as Rural Residential 1:5; Parcel #502294001 is classified as Agriculture AP -20.
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?hf e
RR -5 - Rural Residential
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? hf elpl
Please see attached Map "A". Parcel #502291005 has 650 + feet of marine shoreline along Hood
Canal and McDaniel Cove. Landward of the OHWM of this shoreline, the proposed single-family two-
bedroom residence, proposed visitor parking / turnaround area and proposed new driveway all fall
entirely within a Natural Shoreline Environmental Designation area, with the entire parcel falling
within either Conservancy or Natural Shoreline Environment Designation areas. Adjacent to and
waterward of the OHWM of the Natural Shoreline Designation area is a Priority Aquatic designation
area, which encompasses portions of the second class tidelands associated with this parcel; the
second class tidelands of this parcel waterward of the OHWM of the Conservancy Shoreline
Environment Designation area have an Aquatic designation.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify.
hf el i
Please see attached Maps "A" and "B". Parcel #502291005 has a 650 ± feet of marine shoreline
along Hood Canal and McDaniel Cove. All of this shoreline falls within an approved commercial
shellfish growing area, and is designated by Jefferson County as a fish and wildlife habitat
conservation area (FWHCA) and a critical area. Also within two hundred feet landward of the OHWM
of Hood Canal and McDaniel Cove, all forested areas are regulated under the Washington State
Forest Practices Act and forest practices rules, thereby qualifying this entire parcel as a FWHCA and
critical area under Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.22.200.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?hf elpl
Two people will reside in the completed project.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?hf elpl
No people will be displaced by the completed project.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: hel
Not applicable
L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land
uses and plans, if any:hf e
Please see Maps "A" and "B". Utilizing the 50 -foot road setback (red line), the 160 -foot
buffer / build setback line from Hood Canal (dashed blue line) and the 160 -foot buffer / build
setback line from McDaniel Cove (dashed green line), the only area within the 3.17 acres of
Parcel #502291005 which meets strict application of the dimensional criteria set forth under
this program is a triangle of roughly 40 -feet on each side or an area of approximately 750
square feet, on a sideslope averaging 42%. This 750 square feet constitutes
approximately 0.5% of the total area of Parcel #502291005.
Again although this parcel is 3.17 acres in size, there are only two relatively small areas of
the parcel amenable to development for a single-family residence, given its irregular shape
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014
Page 12 of 20
and overall steep topography. The first area (labeled "Proposed building envelope" on both
Map "A" and "B"), at its nearest point is 84 -feet from the ordinary high water mark of Hood
Canal (well inside the 150 -foot buffer and 160 -foot buffer / build setback requirements), and
at its nearest point is —149 feet from the ordinary high water mark of McDaniel Cove but
meets all property line, highway and easement setback requirements. Vehicle access to
the proposed building envelope would require approximately 130 feet of new driveway
construction. The second area of the parcel potentially amenable to development for a
single-family residence (labeled "Area 2" on Map "B"), is much closer to the ordinary high
water mark of both Hood Canal (approximately only a 25 -foot wide buffer / build setback)
and McDaniel Cove, encroaches on the 20 -foot setback from the easement road, and is
much closer to the nearest neighbor's house (<35 feet), but would require a much shorter
new driveway. There are no other locations within this parcel where a single-family
residence would be less environmentally damaging than these two areas. The "Proposed
building envelope" (and associated single-family residence) is located in the least
environmentally damaging location relative to the shoreline and critical areas on this site
and is the most landward of the two areas described above.
It should also be noted that all four single-family residences on adjacent Parcels
#502294001, 502291004, 50091007 and 502294010 are located within 60 feet of the
ordinary high water mark of Hood Canal or McDaniel Cove, at their nearest point; two
residences are within 25 feet of the ordinary high water mark, at their nearest point.
m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest
lands of long-term commercial significance, if any:
The proposal has no incompatibily with nearby agricultural or forest lands of long-term
commercial significance. In fact, the applicants hope to eventually lease or manage their
own commercial shellfish growing area on the second-class tidelands of Parcel #502291005
for commercial oyster production and already manage two other parcels in Jefferson County
as commercial forest lands.
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid-
dle, or low-income housing.hf elpl
One single-family, two-bedroom residence (2,072 sq. ft. Main Area / 670 sq. ft. Garage / 1,012 sq. ft.
covered / uncovered decks). Middle income housing.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.hf pM
No housing units will be eliminated.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:hf pm
No measures are proposed to reduce or control housing impacts.
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is
the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?hf e
Height of the proposed single-family residence is 28 feet. The principal exterior building material will
be HardiePlank siding. Colors of the siding and trim have not yet been determined, but will likely be
two shades of muted green. The estimated area of windows for the proposed house is approximately
412 square feet.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 13 of 20
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?hf elpl
The view of the site from Hood Canal / McDaniel Cove will change from a matrix of mostly mature
native forest trees and grassy rock outcrops to a two-story home located on a flat bench, partially
screened by undisturbed trees within the existing native forest stand and a portion of the house clearly
visible near the top of a grassy rock outcrop. Currently, vehicle occupants along portions of Highway
101 adjacent to the parcel see either mature undisturbed native forest below the southeast edge of the
highway (along the sidehill portions of Highway 101) or their view is mostly confined to the rock
sidewall of a throughcut portion of Highway 101. Following proposed house construction, there will be
approximately 60 feet of mature evergreen and deciduous forest and understory vegetation buffer
between the planned house and southeast edge of Highway 101, at its nearest point. Following
construction, vehicle occupants northbound on Highway 101 will have a fleeting (three second max)
filtered view of the southwest portion of the house through this screen of forest trees and understory
vegetation. Occupants of southbound Highway 101 vehicles should not see any evidence of the
house at all. The occupants of the single-family residence located just above the top of the Highway
101 throughcut in Parcel #502294022 will likely be able to see portions of the roof and possibly a
portion of the upper wall of one long side of the house through the 60 -foot wide mature evergreen and
deciduous forest and understory vegetation buffer. Occupants of the two single-family residences on
Parcels #502291004 and #502291007 will also have clear or filtered (by mature trees) views of the
new house and driveway, depending upon where on their property they look up toward the new house
/ driveway.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:hf PM
Except for those trees needed to be cleared for the proposed single-family house building envelope,
the new driveway and the visitor parking / turnaround area, all other trees and understory vegetation
will be retained on Parcel #502291005, preserving as much as possible the overall forested character
of the site and the existing views. Over time, native forest trees that were planted over the past two
years for wildlife habitat improvement within areas currently dominated by grass vegetation will mature
and further screen views of the proposed new house from the residences on Parcels #502291004 and
#502291007. Also additional native tree plantings for wildlife habitat improvement have also occurred
within the 60 -foot native forest buffer along Highway 101 over the past two years, which will be
supplemented with additional understory vegetation plantings over the next three to five years. These
plantings within the 60 -foot buffer will further ameliorate negative visual impacts associated with the
proposed development on Parcel #502291005.
11. Light and glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur?hf @
The proposed new house will include the following types of indoor and outdoor lighting:
• recessed ceiling light fixtures in the areas of outdoor covered decks; lighting will only be turned
on as needed for outdoor activity after dark
• inwardly directed wall track light and floor area light fixtures for indoor lighting; indoor artificial
lighting will only be turned on near dusk until approximately 10 pm (at the latest) and then again
for a few hours before and up until just after dawn; any potential glare from indoor lighting will
be muted by window treatments, as well as directing indoor lighting away from windows
• outdoor dusk -to -dawn motion sensor two-level security lighting on three sides of the house /
garage and around the visitor parking / turnaround area; these fixtures illuminate at their lowest
setting starting at dusk and turn off at dawn; they only illuminate at their highest setting when
motion is detected and turn off when motion is no longer sensed
• sunlight through large picture windows
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 14 of 20
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? 1hel
Light or glare from the finished project should not pose any safety hazard. Occupants of vehicles
northbound on Highway 101 will, at most, be exposed to heavily vegetation -filtered indirect indoor
lighting from narrow clerestory windows on the side of the house facing toward the highway and one
additional window potentially visible from the highway but heavily screened by vegetation. All outdoor
lighting (recessed fixtures and motion sensor lights) will either be used infrequently or be of low
illumination and throw only small cones of light that will not extend beyond the proposed decks, as well
as being directed away from the FWHCA; proposed outdoor lighting will only minimally interfere with
views by anyone. The planned indoor lighting may be visible from Hood Canal and McDaniel Cove but
will be partially screened by vegetation and at a distance of approximately 90 horizontal feet from and
approximately 45+ vertical feet above the elevation of ordinary high water mark, at its nearest point.
The two nearest residences fronting McDaniel Cove will also be able to see partially screened indoor
lighting from the proposed new house, but it is not anticipated that this new light source will appreciably
interfere with the view from these residences.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?hf elpl
There are no off-site sources of light or glare that will appreciably affect our proposal.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: [help]
Window treatments will be utilized in the proposed new house to diminish indoor lighting pollution
impacts that potentially interfere with views, have potential safety impacts or potentially shed light into
the FWHCA.
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? 1hel
Recreational opportunities in the immediate vicinity of the project include open navigation and use of
waters of Hood Canal and McDaniel Cove for fishing, crabbing, shrimping, boating, kayaking, etc.
The 650± feet of second class tidelands owned by the applicants are open to tribal shellfish
harvests.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. hf elpl
No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:hf e1
None are proposed.
13. Historic and cultural preservation
a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years
old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or
near the site? If so, specifically describe. hel
No
b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation?
This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts,
or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies
conducted at the site to identify such resources.hf pjo
Washington State's Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation's (DAHP's) WISAARD
predictive model classifies the entirety of Parcel #502291005 as either High or Very High Risk for
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 15 of 20
archaeological resources and highly advises survey. However, as noted in the response to "B.
Environmental Elements, 1. Earth, a. General description of the site" above, a basalt rock quarry
operated on this parcel starting in the mid-1960s and had ceased operation by 1976. Original
topographic conditions and features within the entire parcel were significantly modified by the
physical removal of overburden, much of the topsoil and commercial quantities of rock excavation
during the duration of the rock quarry operation. An oblique aerial photograph from June 1977 shows
that, except for individual trees or small pockets of trees, the entirety of Parcel #502291005 was
denuded of vegetation and the site was highly disturbed. Cessation of the rock quarry operation left
the following features on site: 1) a narrow roadway / bench (accessed from and located below a
deep through -cut on Highway 101), accessing the top of the old quarry, 2) relatively thin topsoil
horizons and relatively deep second soil horizons of fractured basalt rock, 3) three moderate
gradient "push" roads utilized by bulldozers to push basalt rock products down to the shoreline and
out into the tidelands for loading onto barges, 4) two relatively flat rock benches / former pit floors, 5)
steep (50%+) to very steep (up to and greater than 100%) rock pit faces or stable gravel talus
sidecast between the benches, and 6) large quantities of basalt rip -rap boulders discarded during the
former rip -rap barge -loading operations and scattered across the length of the 650+ foot long beach,
mostly below the mean low tide line. As a result of the former rock quarry operation, it is quite
unlikely that there is any undisturbed material evidence of whether Indian or historic use or
occupation may have occurred on this site. Review of DAHP's WISAARD public database does not
indicate that any professional surveys or studies have been conducted at the site to identify cultural
or historic resources.
c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources
on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of
archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc.
hf eM
The applicant (who is member of the Timber / Fish / Wildlife (TFW) Cultural Resources Roundtable,
representing small forest landowners) utilized information, tools and the public database available on
the DAHP's WISAARD website, as well as the 1871 GLO field notes and plats for Section 29, T25N,
R2W. Beyond the WISAARD predictive model advising survey, none of these methods identified
potential cultural or historic resources on or near the project site. Based on the high degree of site
disturbance / modifications associated with the former rock quarry operation, no further assessment
was performed by the applicant.
d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance
to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required.
In the event that any archaeological or historic materials are encountered during proposed project
activities, the applicants and their contractors will stop all work in the immediate vicinity of the
discovery site and implement standard inadvertent discovery protocols to protect the discovery site
(including appropriate stabilization or covering), take reasonable steps to ensure confidentiality of the
discovery site, restrict access to the site of discovery and notify all concerned tribes and appropriate
county, state, and federal agencies, including DAHP. If human remains are uncovered, appropriate
law enforcement agencies will be notified first, and the above steps followed. If the remains are
determined to be Native, consultation with affected tribes will take place to determine final disposition
of said remains.
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and
describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.hf e
See Maps "A" and "C". Highway 101 runs along the north edge of Parcel #502291005, but legal
access to the parcel is via a paved private easement road as shown in yellow on Map "C".
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 16 of 20
b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally
describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?hf PIPJ
Jefferson Transit Route #1 serves the general geographic area of Highway 101 as far south as Triton
Cove. The nearest transit stop to the parcel is Triton Cove, where there is a connection further south
on Highway 101 toward Shelton and Olympia via Mason Transit Route #8.
c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non -project proposal
have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate?hf PIPJ
Currently, there are no formal designated parking spaces on vacant Parcel #502291005. Vehicles
visiting the parcel merely park in several informal areas adjacent to or within the paved private
easement access road within the parcel. The proposed new house includes a two -vehicle garage
and the project includes a visitor parking / turnaround area. The visitor parking / turnaround area
may afford parking space for approximately two or possibly three visiting vehicles, but the area's
main purpose is to provide a large enough space to safely turn around the two vehicles which will be
parked inside the garage and to properly orient the vehicles to safely drive down the planned new
driveway. The completed project will not eliminate any designated parking spaces, as there are
none.
d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian,
bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).hf PIPJ
The ditchline on the upslope edge of the existing paved private access road within Parcel
#502291005 will be upgraded, with a deeper, improved cross-section, both above and below the
inlet and outlet of the planned plastic corrugated cross -drain culvert in the new driveway. The ditch
will also be upgraded for a short distance into adjacent Parcel #502294001, under terms of the
private access road easement to maintain continued ingress and egress into Parcel #502291005.
e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.hf elpl
Other than recreational use of the waters of Hood Canal and McDaniel Cove by the future occupants
of the proposed new house (plus their family and visitors), the project or proposal does not include use
of water, rail or air transportation.
How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal?
If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would
be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation
models were used to make these estimates?hf PIPJ
The completed project is estimated to generate only two to three vehicular roundtrips per average day,
based on two occupants of the proposed new house. Minimal and infrequent delivery vehicles will also
utilize the existing paved private access road
g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and
forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe.
It is not anticipated that this proposal will interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of
agricultural and forest products on roads in the area.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:hf PIPJ
No measures are proposed because no significant transportation impacts are anticipated.
15. Public services
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 17 of 20
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.hf p
The site is located within an almost completely built -out neighborhood and this proposal will not
produce any significant need for increased public services.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.hf e
None proposed
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: JbpjPJ
electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system,
other
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service,
and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might
be needed.hf pM
Propane; applicant is uncertain, as yet, which service provider will be utilized.
C. Signature HELp
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the
lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.
Signature:
Name of signe(
Position and Agency/Organization 06orlC4-
Date Submitted: �F7 7
D. supplemental sheet for non project actions 1heM
(IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction
with the list of the elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of
activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or
at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in
general
terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro-
duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 797-11-960)
May 2014
Page 18 of 20
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or
areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks,
wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) May 2014
Page 19 of 20
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it
would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
services and utilities?
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
SEPA Environmental checklist (MVAC 197-11-960) May 2014 Page 20 of 20
S28'42'58 T
APPROXIMATE O. OS r
PROPERTY LINES Ish
LEGEND/ CSU -44)4 bk4ew line GG �
EXISTING BACKHOE SOIL HOLE OBSERVED (' dram Mct��+ ied Cane, 1'✓ f EXISTING SO 1 °47'08 "E
BY CDS ON 10/20/16. HOLE LOCATIONS 1 _fav% i�r�f�Fer iso fral rem ° ✓� ) WALKWAY 55.26'
ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY AND ARE NOT I s g fAL I 1 / \
BASED ON AN ACTUAL SURVEY
�r�m M f�Ar+itl CDu 11'nNo
PROPOSED 10090+ RESERVES 14°3822 "E
DRAINFIELD AREA ! EXO
r r , ; ; � t I ~ V ,'� EDGGEE OF 5 � . 0
r (1, 150 SQUARE FEET) I 1 ASPHALT
I,
EXISTING
ROCK
0 40 }1 , ; I. r fi+y14 r t't 7` i� WALL
;, �fY i �• ii ' 1 EXISTING
bud : i 3 WATER ° "
SCALE /N FEET r ' I + Q' ', III
EXISTING ACCESS ROUTE ��. I, i /_ . 1 r VgLVE. S 310,0 1 E
s (,k / S?i
i 6 M i0�/ �+� , yr f EXISTING 62. 72 '
r a j
C d a � ! U b LUC i '/N'
FENCE
i y�- I EXISTING
, POWER -- - � �
r POLES v
I VAfery mark
„r -, •rr i I'� Mc'knid Cove
r 7- 1
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
r n II 1 OF EXISTING 10' X 20' N09 °59 ' 7 "lN
CENTERLINE OF EXISTING r � t j - & t 6 U'S ft r r 1 AI& %� �, . r r �n r ;° /, PRIMARY BED
RIGHT OF WAY / f `' 1 ►r . (SEP94-00461) 40 15
-6m Noc1d
/ Cand (sof; d
jlAt
oh
APP X� TE N37°46 53 W
S34° 1028 "E--- L N OF
28.50'
EXIS17 12.5' X
16' SA FILTER \ EXISTING 1
50.00 STING (SEP94-0461) EASEMENT
yd PANE
EXISTI 1,000 1 l
GALLON', UMP
CHAMBE z0-l00f S_�baLk From f TnGl1T(bTO(Ull Cit>c
j - i
(SEP94- 461) ,.F`,
S82 °33WSDO
50 ��'oo-F r'bac� _ ����-� - �XIs7r{u �• �.- .� � � 8
sQ QC GC �; ne (rLG� ii �C {. WATER
APPROXIMATE pS 0• v VALVA O, 30 � MONUMENT
ELEV=26.81
PROPERTY LINES �Q S`° ~
�'' EXISTING 1,000 NA VO 88
PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE " -y`` — —GALLON SEPT TANK
(SEP94-00461)
APPROXIMATE
�- - - PROPERTY LINES
j
WOWAPPROXIMATE SHORELINE
�� �
February 10, 2017 4:32:45 p.m. APPROXIMATE SHORELINE PERS i)1G�inaro� h/�h wAi+' rrlark APER COUNTY PARCEL MAP
PP>bn l+nom ��F�.rao�"� N0.iUTa{ a
Drawing: BARNOWE-MEYER 502291005.DWG.DWG COUNTY PARCEL MAP N o o1J, Canal Con kr ruan(,� S h o re J A a b es r G t,a�,'p ns
CREATIVE DESIGN SOLUTIONS, INC. 2017 _ (0rokli If -re, u
PARCEL 02291005 ~� CREATIVE DESIGN
REVISION DATE SITE
1 A Al DETAIL 40 SCALE MAP IFS " { SOLUTIONS
DRAWN BY: MICHAEL S. DEENEY J L�+�`i t Y Septic System Designs, Permits, d Inspections
SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE: 2110/17 FOR. STEVEN BARNOWE-MEYER P.O. BOX 2787, PORT ANGELES, WASHINGTON 98362
29(25•-2W) CDS (800) 395-7296, (360) 457-6353, EMAIL: MIKE@CDS4YOU.COM
' nffso tnsl ww.i Filt! w aln 9i�KrW�'i�
AI/IS 1 .1a S:■� RBi « LE °h 190Y04
Tf* 11ket(�) is PflD'videu, wilijout chq
re! a; rf tai thecwf
P "e,aff Ina
fy includil, but Aatri
NE1/4 29 -25N -2W) F;rx�;,} a�,•,, _, iirT.
Mc.&na/d Crtek r4a4 4. 1c f! ;trt r1 ;;T c; j
{t ' i l.i� ,�M a7 w �,.r T A._ :7,t � ,/T iy{}f
it r+ ft }.,,, {Y ^y w
1V S iiG ! i ' J�,e LV ?'% ' P J '. �i ,
tm
I shm!dr i-- made to a eFen
I
irator; rl�i a 1. gall` "Urvey for kPli ter
McDONALD
/me DANIk`-
I " A 3.16 Ch VE A
I� -,8
I r 4.57 a. 1
LO =2204M 6.84 Ch.
PTN ®Erm mw ausm
I'Q UNE LMO-14MG-1862=3
2.70 a �\ �i'{o 8'ateLp 6y Is'+o
I
30'w* 6y rcb'lo�y �1
�Z07 a p((PKSiI'O� d �GpL
400MV011 3(S 1S0' OF N
HYIY EX � BEiti,4EFT,N �� t5
I
COV T � LOT �\
� .
506.47' "4
50229 2 rr �` ����`
TAX 7 l i /, C
I � 2. a. �, f '` '�, �\ ` 4.89 Ch.
F
I 5o229 14
00.00' 1`AX I8 / y` +� � 1, It X 22 (mss SO 1(f)I x
J-74' ' I J�' _ 0.06 CL
y19
TT1iR!(E'2) Tax 22(SI07
I � � � . 1~ O' /Y 1�
0.09 a
X Q o >r�� y pca �''FR �r n i ` + TAX 18 R 7L TAX E3
04
a.
t— p I 1 2
L _ cat 'q L a' Z {
,
/ \ j 23 'TL TAX E4
0 68 51� 1 0, •—•£ 0.09 a
29) z95' TAX 18 do TL TAX E1
,S35
R 10� z� 3.17 a. :_ . SURFSIDE
f '~
VI STA
aT� TAX 12 ,
E
�. 0.41 a9.85Ch. =
. � 502294004frr'V a -f c P
£ TyA�X}Oc.Mp�B�OS�7�tif CAfP/nNyif roa�
0.21 a.
TAX 7 5a2 140M
y, - -
Cy Cs� all a+ 0.42 a map 11^ /1
�I m ROCKY
0
EXISTING APPROXIMATE LOCATION
EXISTING FENCE OF EXISTING 10' X 20'
WALKWAY PRIMARY BED
Approy"I'j-1.1, propose ri 1x (SEP94-00461) /
lrr'eph0Af, conneG ro _ � dr ; j t /
EXISTING pfly Qf4d hobs L r �T'1� �C r.2. S��3D /OF EXISTING 12.5'APPROXIMATE 4X 16'
LEGEND TION
EDGE OF f F 11N G x I S ;r `� �� SAND FILTER
ASPHALT £xis TURC EXISTING zT�j R a 'i
1 EXISTING BACKHOE SOIL HOLE OBSERVED SS�UC .► POWER f e1'� (SEP94-00461)
BY CDS ON 10/20/16. HOLE LOCATIONS ' ., POLES
ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY AND ARE NOT EXISTING EXISTING CONTROL PANEL
BASED ON AN ACTUAL SURVEY. WATER (SEP94-00461)
J EXISTING VALVE.
EXISTING 1,000 GALLON
,?ASEMEi3T ROCK- PUMP CHAMBER
" 0 - -- 0 $YALE._ =__: D (SEP94-00461)
J
- f
y;
Jcc Ui� 1* 1' fpG! fCC� -ry - + +f I I/
qEXISTING 1 000
GA LDN
5h,zi 1 o0�SEPTICTANKII
T
r��i1{/nq p0 AD�t
(SEP94- dfi1)
f a-rce�l I s Mow
124c Ifoc-PDr�(OPD) MATE �«. j4cr te_ • w 0 ` P I GJ ldck- �` P 7�IP., EXIS]7NG Ili j f �p/0 Coie" o
n
PROPERTY
L
liuf Wo,hf 1 iAt c.Te rc'Joa
prl� WATER J
t"w i by o�� r �nf iD �� � 'S _9 ` f i YALVE
�t
^rwC f Cour GUc4ft4 Drsfiit.i�`'
be �pgmoltrL = -r r "f # r n' IU N!71 lb t� t "AIS fol `
7 Proposed 8' y ��ry-,
L corrvi�wl ea rJUS fJ G A ci7e�
D
CroSS�p�foi'R La mc r �'a� RYe rip f
I� `�ri�'r Irry U, id V
�6,.I r.n�mr 1pu' Swrfae.,,
r APPROXIMATE SHORELINE
scam m r G76
�- > � y � � - � � PER COUNTY PARCEL MAP
i
` s r
si'� A r>� `
C(lhAVKZ4AJ _3
(a! �. /' G,a r 1 E xrsfi� ouGnc�rzG( pour"
�,
PO�J � ° � IN,
� � � t � '� Fale hone u}rlih IinZ1
Ire-
PO r,. , 4�'�• ` '. � r. '%
IDWCr��
CIO
CENTERLINE OF EXISTING
RIGHT OF WAY
._ ��``�.\` �Lon `�uP � , i� . � r �' °
N�yhwa 1012A`�, ,� !;� ;� Itca elb k �}r 1 �uff�� �f $xarn
/ \ - ' ` ► 6 ter.,,' t r v�•k f.� (�a ! I'n
3A aL,Ff CrfGrr
IN, _ e4 5A
NN
PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE
6A c;o
PROPOSED 100X+ RESERVE
�•
`�, .•` �} � ! � � � , ?.6" - ac`s'-DRAINFfELD AREA
(1, 160 SQUARE FEET)
February 10, 2017 4:32:45 p.m. EXISTING ACCESS ROUTE— APPROXIMATE I
Drawing: BARNOWE-MEYER 502291005.DWG.DWG PROPERTY LINES
CCD CREATIVE DESIGN SOLUTIONS, INC. 2017
REVISION51c(10,Abe00 Cha DATE NMI7 PARCEL 50229 005 srOKMuv�,Tr=R SIrr- F�,AN E- TA I[!",y�P M,910 CREATIVE DESIGN
S1 TE PIAN DETAIL 30 SCALE SOLUTIONS
DRAWN BY: MICHAEL S. DEENEY srtr R D D R E SS k 31 z X10 3 I h h w FO1 f\ I Septic System Designs, Permits, d Inspections
SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE: 2/10/17 FOR: STEVEN &P—MEYER `� P.O. BOX 2787, PORT ANGELES, WASHINGTON 98392
FDHvlNon R ` e3zo 29(25-2W} CDS (800) 395-7298, (380) 457-8353, EMAIL: MIKE@CDS4YOU.COM