Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Agenda 11-01-2017Jefferson County Planning Commission MEETING AGENDA Tri-Area Community Center November 1, 2017 P: 360-379-4450 621 Sheridan St. F: 360-379-4451 Port Townsend WA 98368 plancomm@co.jefferson.wa.us 5 OPENING BUSINESS • Call to Order/Roll Call • Approval of Agenda • Approval of previous Meeting Minutes, if available • Commissioner Announcements • Director’s Update 6 DISCUSSION • Comprehensive Plan Vision Statement–Final Product • Housing Element Update ............................................ Patty Charnas, DCD Director 7 OBSERVER COMMENT See Observer Comment Conduct, below. 7 CLOSING BUSINESS • Summary of today’s meeting • Follow-up action items • Agenda Items for the following Planning Commission meeting 7 ADJOURNMENT • Thank you for coming and participating in your government at work! Observer Comment Conduct When the Chair recognizes you to speak, please begin by stating your name and address. Please be aware that the observer comment period is … 1) An optional time period dedicated to listening to the public, not a question and answer session. The Planning Commission is not required to provide response; 2) Offered at the Chair’s discretion when there is time; 3) Not a public hearing – comments made during this time will not be part of any hearing record; 4) May be structured with a three-minute per person time limit. 15 PM 00 PM 00 PM 30 PM 30 PM Jefferson County, WA Vision Statement 11/01/2017 1 FINAL VISION STATEMENT Jefferson County, Washington encompasses 1,803 square miles bound on its northern and eastern shores by the vast Salish Sea with the Pacific Ocean to the west, and touches Hood Canal at its southeast corner. The terrestrial borders of Jefferson County join with Clallam County to the north and west, and Mason and Grays Harbor Counties to the south. Approximately 66% of the total County acreage is in public ownership. Jefferson County stretches across Olympic National Park, Olympic National Forest, spectacular rainforests and mighty rivers including the Queets, Quinault, Bogachiel, Elwha, Duckabush, Dosewallips and hundreds of miles of shoreline. The first inhabitants of this vast region were indigenous people belonging to a number of different tribes who occupied the territory for millennia. Jefferson County respectfully honors treaty rights as guaranteed to tribal nation signatories of the Point No Point Treaty of 1885 and other government-to-government agreements. Early settlements by newcomers began in the mid-1800s. Today’s towns and villages, rural crossroads and tribal nations in Jefferson County grew from early-established footprints of urban, commercial, and cultural centers. We envision a continuation of longstanding planning priorities in Jefferson County to benefit the quality-of-life of all residents. We embrace a balance of tradition and innovation in preserving the rural character of our land and lifestyles. Land use priorities identify open spaces, forests and farmland for long-term management and conservation, while also embracing innovations that foster opportunities for increased synergy between natural and built environments. We encourage and facilitate development and utilization of low-impact techniques, localized bioremediation, and other innovations in housing and industry that benefit overall ecosystem vitality and biodiversity while aiding ecological restoration and adapting to climate disruption. We believe that investing in the resilience of our local economy, culture, and ecosystem yields benefits for current residents and future generations. Jefferson County, WA Vision Statement 11/01/2017 2 FINAL Now and into the Future Our vibrant community fabric offers opportunity for all residents, including working-class individuals and families, as well as those who struggle to live, thrive, and age with dignity. Jefferson County values creativity and life-long learning and reveres constitutional rights, personal independence and privacy. We value public access to high-quality education, public services, and facilities. We place emphasis on community spaces and networks of non-motorized trails, bike lanes, and paths that encourage active and interactive communities of healthy individuals. We prioritize access for community members of all ages to safe and active environments, to health care including mental health care, preventative care, and long-term care, as well as access to healthy, local food. We continually strive for invigoration of our local economy through an intentional balance and integration of diversified economic activity, including food system development, marine trades, resource-based, high-tech and science-based trades, and sectors relating to tourism, art and civics, as well as improved infrastructure networks to support a robust economy. We believe that investing in the resilience of our local economy, culture, and ecosystem yields benefits for current residents and future generations. We honor and respect that the natural world is integral to our health and lifestyles. We protect our open spaces, shorelines, forests, clean air and clean water, wildlife and wildlife habitat so that future generations may also practice stewardship of the land, the seas, and the communities of Jefferson County. HOUSING ELEMENT Preliminary Draft Update 1 HOUSING ELEMENT Jefferson County continues to exist as a rural region that provides ideal lands for outdoor recreation, conservation and resource-based jobs. While the approximately 31,000 residents highly value this enviable “quality of life” there is an existing and growing lack of affordable housing for many sectors of the population, especially for the moderate, low and very-low income households. Since the last periodic update of the Comprehensive Plan in 2004, Jefferson County has not experienced appreciable growth in population, jobs or residential development. This is despite a general recovery from the Great Recession and a growth in rural regions of adjacent jurisdictions. Without question, Jefferson County is challenged by a lack of economic opportunities and a very real shortage of affordable housing. The purpose of the Housing Element is to ensure the vitality and character of residential neighborhoods by assessing existing and future needs for housing in Jefferson County so that housing is available for all economic segments of the community now and in the future. Existing residential patterns, demographic trends and projected population growth typically provide the basis for this assessment. In light of significant and growing gaps in rural economic development and affordable and available housing, the Housing Element periodic update will closely align with • Economic Development: moderately-priced housing is critical to support job creation and expansion • Capital Facilities/Utilities and Transportation Elements: additional housing is best planned for where there is existing or planned utilities, transit/transportation routes and other community levels of service • Land Use Element: land use designations and implementing development standards are key to supporting housing goals and policies. This Element addresses the range of housing opportunities and in particular, the challenges that confront Jefferson County in providing affordable housing options now and over the 20-year planning period. The County will work cooperatively with public and private housing providers to create and maintain safe and attractive housing stock and encourage the siting and development of affordable housing. DR A F T HOUSING ELEMENT Preliminary Draft Update 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS Jefferson County’s residents occupy a range of housing types including private individual single-family residences (9,761), mobile homes and manufactured units (2,881), multi-family complexes, including duplexes, condominiums and apartments (365). Throughout Jefferson County, accessory dwelling units (ADUs) are allowed in all residential zones; the exact contribution of ADUs to overall housing stock in the County is not known. Based on the countywide planning policies adopted by Jefferson County and the City of Port Townsend, approximately thirty-six percent of all new population growth is targeted to occur in the City of Port Townsend, which is currently the County’s single incorporated urban growth area. The City of Port Townsend’s Comprehensive Plan calls for a range of household sizes, housing types and densities. The City possesses urban levels of planned density and is supported by urban levels of services such as municipal wastewater treatment. Housing development at higher densities in the County’s unincorporated areas are possible in the Port Hadlock Urban Growth Area (UGA). Urban housing densities, however, are stymied by a lack of municipal wastewater treatment. A sewer facility plan was prepared in 2009 and received state review and approvals along with site design, engineering and a financing plan. Construction of the Port Hadlock UGA wastewater treatment project has not begun. Funding to begin the sewer system’s installation is not available. For this periodic update, consideration will be given to options that help in the planning and development of housing in the Port Hadlock UGA while funding and resources continue to be sought for a sewer system. Port Townsend and Port Ludlow are presently the only two communities that have level of service standards that would accommodate the density, services and other criteria for locating multi-family residential housing. The Port Hadlock UGA is planning for a sewer service area that will meet requirements for higher density housing. Jefferson County contains a predominately-rural residential land use pattern. This pattern allows single-family dwellings throughout a majority of Jefferson County. The Port Ludlow Master Planned Resort, Port Hadlock UGA and Rural Village Centers of Brinnon and Quilcene provide opportunities for greater densities and the creation of multi-family housing units, depending on available infrastructure. Since the last Comprehensive Plan update in 2004 and continuing for the current 20 year planning period, population growth is expected to occur at a very modest rate (~1% annually). There is sufficient undeveloped, under-developed and vacant land available to accommodate future housing needs on a gross unit basis. While there is sufficient undeveloped rural residentially-zoned land in the unincorporated county, the barriers to adding to the county’s housing stock in a way that provides DR A F T HOUSING ELEMENT Preliminary Draft Update 3 affordability is constrained by the minimum acreage for creation of new parcels (five acres), land costs, and utility creation/installation costs and availability (legally available water supply and affordable on-site waste water treatment). These factors are principle contributors to a well-documented 2017 “affordable housing crisis.” DR A F T HOUSING ELEMENT Preliminary Draft Update 4 Countywide Planning Policy #6: Policy on the Provision of Affordable Housing DR A F T HOUSING ELEMENT Preliminary Draft Update 5 Some selected statistics on Jefferson County housing, household types and housing affordability appear below: Table 5- 1 Housing Units by Type 2011-2015 US Census Bureau American Community Survey Selected Housing Characteristics for Jefferson County, WA Type of Housing Number of Units Percent of Total Units Single Family Detached 13,698 76.5% Attached 263 1.57% Total Single Family 12,997 77.9 Multi-Family 2 to 4 Units 566 3.2% 5 to 9 Units 233 1.3% 10 or More Units 630 3.5% Total Multi-Family 1,429 8.0% Mobile, Manufactured 2,247 12.5% Boat, RV, van, etc. 277 1.5% Total Housing Units 17,914 100.0% Total occupied housing units is 13,422 Port Hadlock housing DR A F T HOUSING ELEMENT Preliminary Draft Update 6 Table 5- 2 Household Type and Size countywide Persons per Household Percent of Households Percent of Family Households Percent of Non-Family Households 1 32.2 N/A* 80.1% 2 45.9 65% 17.5% 3 10.7 16.9% 1.6% 4 6.8 10.9% 0.6% 5 2.6 4.2% 0.1% 6 1 1.7% 0.1% 7+ .8 1.3% 0.0 Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Table 5- 3 Household Income and Monthly Housing Costs 2011-2015 US Census Bureau American Community Survey Selected Housing Characteristics for Jefferson County, WA DR A F T HOUSING ELEMENT Preliminary Draft Update 7 Table 5- 4 Housing Affordability Levels by Income Group Income Group Definition Annual Household Income Affordable Monthly Housing Cost Affordable Monthly Rent Affordable Mortgage Payment Extremely Low Income Less than 30% of Median $0-14,061 $351 $0-263 $0-228 Very Low Income 31% to 50% of Median $14,062- 23,435 $352-586 $273-454 $238-396 Low Income 51% to 80% of Median $23,436– 37,966 $587-937 $470-750 $418-656 Moderate Income 81% to 95% of Median $37,967- $44,527 $938-1,113 $774-918 $687-807 Middle Income 96% to 120% of Median $44,528- 56,244 $1,114- 1,406 $947-1,195 $844-1,022 Upper Income Greater than 121% of Median $56,245 $1,406 $1,230 $1,097 *Data based from 2010 Census Notable Other Statistics regarding Jefferson County Households and Housing Affordability • The U.S. Housing and Urban Development department (HUD) found that for low- income renter households (households at ≤ 80% of average median income or AMI), 67% are “cost-burdened” (pay more than 30% of their total income for housing). • Thirty-eight percent of low-income renters are “extremely cost burdened.” For renter with very-low incomes (< 50% AMI), 75% are cost-burdened and 55% are extremely cost-burdened. • Twenty-five percent of all low income, owner-occupied households in Jefferson County are cost-burdened and 30% are extremely cost-burdened. • For very-low-income households, 65% are cost-burdened and 40% are extremely cost-burdened. • Jefferson County has the highest median age in the State of Washington at 53.9 years, with a negative natural increase--deaths outpacing births. Population increase is attributed primarily to migration (2016 Population Trends, OFM). Meeting the housing needs of an aging population will be an increasingly important issue in the next 20 years. DR A F T HOUSING ELEMENT Preliminary Draft Update 8 Assisted Housing Programs and Resources in Jefferson County Jefferson County participates and supports area programs that provide housing assistance to income-limited families and individuals and to other special needs groups. The Peninsula Housing Authority, Olympic Community Action Programs and other public and private, non-profit groups provide assistance in the form of funding, services, home rehabilitation and/or homeownership help. Based on recent data, there are insufficient funds and resources to serve all individuals and households that qualify for housing assistance. There is a well-documented lack of affordable rental apartments and houses. The lack of affordable rental units means that households that qualify for rental assistance cannot find homes and apartments whose rent meets “fair market rates.” Another challenge to planning and developing affordable housing is the desired proximity that in needed to services that help the County’s most vulnerable populations including the low- income elderly, disabled Veterans, disadvantaged youth, and persons with mental and/or physical disabilities. The Annual Point in Time Count found 189 homless in Jefferson County on January 26, 2017 Homelessness Homelessness in Jefferson County is a very real problem not confined to any one sector of the County’s population. Homelessness occurs in a variety of ways. Some families or individuals experience job loss, reduced household income, domestic violence, increases in housing, living and medical costs and other displacing events. Some become suddenly homeless and others may be chronically homeless. Homelessness includes those that are accommodated in emergency shelters, stay temporarily with family or friends or other transitory housing or are “unsheltered” living on the streets, in forested areas, in vehicles or other conditions that do not provide safe shelter. Jefferson County’s current regulations do not support transitory accommodations, temporary encampments or other ways to provide additional options for temporary housing for the homeless. This update will include goals and policies that address a variety of means to provide shelter and supportive services to transition the homeless and other vulnerable populations to more permanent housing. DR A F T HOUSING ELEMENT Preliminary Draft Update 9 HOUSING GOALS AND POLICIES Safe, affordable housing is a fundamental need for all citizens in Jefferson County. Jefferson County communities are strong, vibrant and healthy when there is safe and reliable housing that meets the full range of income levels, household sizes, preferences and needs. Jefferson County citizens’ average household incomes have not kept up with increasing prevailing housing costs. The result is a widespread lack of safe and affordable housing for many county citizens and especially for populations with special needs. Community feedback and public comments to date reflect a strong desire for improved housing opportunities on a countywide basis to address affordability, homelessness and improved access to economic opportunities. GOAL: HSG 1.0 Encourage and support efforts to increase housing availability for County residents of all income groups. POLICIES: HSP 1.1 Identify locations where housing development can be promoted and work with inter-jurisdictional and public-private cooperative groups to increase a broad spectrum of housing supplies including market-rate homes, moderately-priced homes and housing for lower income households. HSP 1.2 Assess the progress of Countywide Planning Policy #6 to better document successes, challenges and opportunities to inform housing programs, the development community and housing advocacy groups HSP 1.3 Update code and development standard that preserve existing higher densities and improve housing development and redevelopment opportunities in county Urban Growth Areas, Rural Village Centers, Rural Crossroads, and Master Planned Resorts . HSP 1.3 Provide public and private, non-profit housing assistance programs with information on areas where moderate-to-low income housing can be DR A F T HOUSING ELEMENT Preliminary Draft Update 10 accommodated based on zoning, existing lot density, access to transit, jobs or other support services. HSP 1.4 Support the Peninsula Housing Authority, Habitat for Humanity, and Olympic Community Action Programs, in their efforts to assist income- limited households with funding for home repairs and other housing rehabilitation assistance. GOAL: HSG 2.0 Promote a variety of housing choices throughout the County with innovative land use practices, community redevelopment strategies, development standards, design techniques, and building and infrastructure permit requirements. POLICIES: HSP 2.1 Explore regulatory opportunities that help minimize costs to developing affordable housing while ensuring that public health, safety and environmental quality standards are not compromised. HSP 2.2 Encourage and support greater opportunity for the development of innovative housing types to increase the inventory of affordable housing throughout the County. Work cooperatively with public and private housing experts on community redevelopment strategies, residential mixed-use development, single and multi-family attached housing, duplexes, triplexes, apartment houses, mixed-use, senior and multi- care facilities, community housing, farm worker housing, tiny homes, etc. Encourage development patterns such as clustering in Rural Village Centers and Urban Growth Areas, provided adequate infrastructure and services are in place. HSP 2.3 Pursue demonstration and pilot projects that document the safety and reliability of innovative technologies such as composting toilets, gray water systems, site-specific nutrient management plans, water conservation, and net zero energy systems that minimize housing development costs, reduce environmental impacts and provide more affordable housing options throughout the County. HSP 2.4 Initiate housing development in response to the critical lack of worker housing in the Port Hadlock urban growth area and other established rural employment areas that allows higher residential density to be served by other than public sewer. DR A F T HOUSING ELEMENT Preliminary Draft Update 11 HSP 2.5 Review and revise development standards and land use codes to allow for manufactured home and RV parks as a way to increase housing supplies. HSP 2.6 Consider development standards that would provide bonus densities in return for providing a percentage of low or moderate-income housing units for multi-unit residences in the future Irondale/Port Hadlock Urban Growth Area. HSP 2.7 Reference the Transportation, Capital Facilities, Utilities, and Urban Growth Area Elements of this Plan for public facilities planning in connection to planning for affordable housing development sites. GOAL: HSG 3.0 Develop and maintain partnerships with the housing assistance programs, and other public and private groups and agencies to support maintenance and rehabilitation of existing housing stock and provide new and affordable housing opportunities. POLICIES: HSP 3.1 Support weatherization, housing rehabilitation and energy conservation activities and programs to ensure households are safe and well maintained for low-income households. HSP 3.3 Coordinate with the Peninsula Housing Authority and other groups and agencies to identify areas most in need of rehabilitation assistance and infrastructure improvements. To the extent possible, coordinate public investments in capital infrastructure with rehabilitation efforts. HSP 3.4 Reinvigorate cooperative city-county coordination regarding affordable housing, low-income and special needs household assistance and regulatory updates to support affordable housing development throughout Jefferson County. Determine and fund staffing and other resources necessary to sustain continuous coordination regarding affordable housing. GOAL: HSG 4.0 Pursue a transitory housing program to address homelessness and encourage the development of housing for people with DR A F T HOUSING ELEMENT Preliminary Draft Update 12 special needs (individuals who require assistance for disabilities that may be physical medical, social or psychological). POLICIES: HSP 4.1 Allow for a continuum of care for special needs populations, in UGAs and Rural Village Centers, including emergency housing, transitional housing, assisted living, group homes, senior housing and low-income housing. HSP 4.2 Encourage and support the development and implementation of a transitory accommodation permitting process that allows for single- family, small and large indoor and outdoor transitory and safe park accommodations in cooperation with willing public and private landowners. HSP 4.4 Coordinate with Olympic Community Action Programs, the Peninsula Housing Authority, nonprofit housing providers, and other public and private housing interests to ensure that low income and special needs housing is sited in locations that are adequately served by necessary support facilities and infrastructure. DR A F T