HomeMy WebLinkAbout050 95
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON
STATE OF WASHINGTON
In the Matter of Adopting the
1995 Jefferson County Parks
Comprehensive Plan
Resolution No.
50-95
WHEREAS, the Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan is now five years old; and,
WHEREAS, the Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan states "The plan, in its entirety, should
be updated every five years"; and,
WHEREAS, the Jefferson County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board reviewed the various
Community Plans to better develop a parks plan consistent with the interests and views of the community-
at-large; and, '
WHEREAS, the revised Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan, dated June 1995, has been
thoroughly reviewed by the Jefferson County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board; and,
WHEREAS, the Jefferson County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board held a duly and widely
publicized public hearing on the revised Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, in the judgment of the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners, the revised plan
represents the philosophies of Jefferson County citizens toward future parks and open space retention,
improvement, and development; and,
WHEREAS, said revised plan encourages orderly development and improvement of parks and open
spaces with the County harmonious with the wishes of Jefferson County citizens; and,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOL VED that the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners do hereby
approve and certify the Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan, dated June 1995, as attached; and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOL VED that the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners will diligently
uphold, promote, and maintain the integrity of the principles, goals, and policies contained herein, which
may include the adoption of official controls deemed necessary to assure the systematic execution of said
revised plan.
~ '
APPROVED AND CERTIFIED this If' L., day of ;JtVtUL., 1995.
JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
.
VOL
2'1 '1f-76~
r,..)", \J
~ìl
,(,\
Jefferson County
Parks
. Comprehensive
Plan
Adopted June 19, 1995
by
Resolution No. 50-95
, VOL 21 rAG~ 769
- -
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTIONANDPURPOSE...........................1-1
CHAPTER 2
THEPlANNINGPROCESS...............................2-1
CHAPTER 3
JEFFERSON COUNTY AND ITS RESOURCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 - 1
CHAPTER 4
INVENTORY........................................4-1
CHAPTER 5
PARK AND RECREATION DEMANDS, NEEDS AND PRIORITIES. . . . . . 5 - 1
CHAPTER 6
GOAL, STRATEGIES, POLICIES AND PROCEDURES. . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 - 1
CHAPTER 7
TRAllS............................................7-1
CHAPTER 8
OPENSPACE .......................................8-1
CHAPTER 9
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . 9 - 1
CHAPTER 10
ACTION PROGRAMS .................................10-1
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Table of Contents
, VOL 21 éM/77'J
i
CHAPTER 11
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ......................11-1
CHAPTER 12
OPTIONS FOR PLAN IMPLEMENTATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 - 1
CHAPTER 13
PUBlICINVOLVEMENT...."...........................13-1
Appendix A: Map of Jefferson County, Washington. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a - 1
Appendix B: Inventory of Parks & Recreation Sites. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a - 2
Appendix C: Summary Park, Recreation, and Open Space Assets by Type. . a - 8
Appendix D: Planning Areas of Eastern Jefferson County. . . . . . . . . . . . a - 10
Appendix E: Planning Commission Workshops: May 1990 . . . . . . . . . . . . a - 11
Appendix F: The Port of Port Townsend. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a - 19
Appendix G: Jefferson County Population by Age Group 1980, 1990, 1993
................................................ a - 21
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Table of Contents
ii
VOL
21. r.~r,ç 771
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
Throughout history, Jefferson County has been a land which inspired enthusiasm.
Prior to the arrival of European settlers and explorers, Jefferson County was inhabited
by several tribes of indigenous Salish-speaking people, and by two tribes' of another
(Chimakuan) linguistic family. In the West End, the Ouillayute and Ouinaylt tribes
made their homes, while the Clallam, Chimacum, and Twanados occupied the eastern
portion of the county.
The Ouillayutes and Ouinaults were expert whale and seal hunters. They were also
adept at trading with their neighboring tribes. Occasionally, tribes from Vancouver
Island to the Columbia River engaged in coastal warfare. This fighting caused
intertribal strife (particularly with the Makah), but did not prevent intertribal trade.
Fishing and logging are still primary occupations of the Ouinault and Ouillayute.
The Ouillayutes shared with the Chimacum tribe the distinction of being the only non-
Salish-speaking peoples on the Olympic Peninsula. Legend is that during a great flood
or tidal wave the Ouillayute people lashed together many canoes in which to ride out
the storm. A small number of those canoes broke away and floated over the Olympic
Mountains to the area now known as Port Hadlock. The inhabitants of the castaway
canoes became the Chimacum, a tribe which, until its extinction, remained in the Port
Hadlock vicinity.
The Chimacum tribe was small in number even in the late 18th century. Clamming
along the coast and fishing in Chimacum Creek provided abundant sustenance. They
were a particularly pugnacious people and warfare was a fundamental part of tribal
life, but, as with most of the native population, disease was the primary cause of the
tribe's decimation. The remaining Chimacum were virtually annihilated in a raid by
the Clallam and Suquamish tribes (an encounter led by the Suquamish chief Seattle).
The few survivors were absorbed into other tribes. The landmark known as
Tamanamus Rock is the site of many tribal legends and stories. The dragon
Noquiklos, who befriended a young Chimacum warrior, was said to have lived at the
rock. Tamanamus Rock was also alleged to be the site to which the entrapped tribe
members fled during Seattle's raid. Members of the Clallam tribe, regarded by some
as the most powerful and warlike of the Salish-speaking people along the Washington
coast, occupied the eastern portion of the county formerly held by the Chimacums.
Chief Chetzemoka of the Clallams often acted as arbiter in the conflicts between the
I ed. note: Infomration for native history section of this document was gathered from many
sources, especially: NativA AmArican Indian by Edward S. Curtis, 1893; and Indian!; of PIIgAt Sound -
thA notAbook!; of Myron!; EAII!;, University of Washington Press, date unknown.
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter I: Introduction & Purpose ~ VOL
1-1
21 rAG: 772
tribe and the white settlers in the area, and is today remembered as a statesman.
Chetzemoka Park in Port Townsend is named in his honor.
The Port Hadlock area, and in particular the site of what is now the Port Hadlock
Marina and Inn, Skunk Island and the surrounding waterfront, was a major and
important center, having permanent buildings and being referred to by some as the
Capital of the Puget Sound Clans2. The potlatch, a ceremony in which one
established one's wealth by distributing it to others, was common to all tribes in
Jefferson County, and was an occasion of great honor to the host. The last great
potlatch on the Olympic Peninsula was held by Old Patsy in Port Hadlock in the
1890s.
The early explorers of many nations were intrigued by Jefferson County's uncharted
features and astounded by its many bounties. It was in Jefferson County in 1775
that white men were first recorded as having set foot on what would become the
state of Washington: two Spaniards, Lt. Juan Quadra and Cmdr. Burno Haceta, came
ashore near the mouth of the Hoh River to claim this territory for Spain.
In late April of 1792, Captain George Vancouver entered the tranquil waters of Juan
de Fuca Strait after months of struggle against the elements and the Pacific Ocean.
Although he did not find the legendary and much-sought Northwest Passage, he was
much impressed by the awesome beauty of the land. No doubt the colorful and
enthusiastic description that filled the journals of many early explorers had a bearing
on deciding which lands, in 1848, should be included in the important addition to the
United States known as the Oregon Territory. In the last half of the 1800s the
enthusiasm continued as settlers from around the world came by land and sea to take
advantage of this country. Shipbuilding, logging, sawmills, farming, breweries, and
canneries flourished. Ships from every maritime nation of the world moored in the
harbors at Port Townsend, Port Ludlow, Port Hadlock, Irondale and Discovery Bay.
Preparations were made for metropolises at Port Townsend and Irondale and the
industrial expectations for these areas of the county were high. Settlers continued
to come and penetrated deeply into the wilderness, away from the more settled
areas. It was these sturdy families who founded the early communities at Brinnon,
Quilcene, Chimacum, Nordland, Discovery Bay, and the Hoh River. Many of their
descendants reside today in the rural communities which their forefathers established
over a century ago.
The prosperity of Jefferson County has risen and declined sharply a number of times
in the past 100 years. The high expectations in the 1870' s of being the terminus of
the transcontinental railroad ended in economic disaster as eastern Puget Sound
became the transportation center of the Pacific Northwest. The development of Fort
2 A variety of artifacts have been found in the middens of the area. Both Indian and Chinese
populations left detritus in middens, although exploration of the sites has not be extensive.
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 1: Introduction & Purpose
1 - 2 VOL
21 f,~:;; 773
Worden and Fort Flagler as military bases during both World Wars, accompanied by
the subsequent post-war withdrawal of military personnel had serious impact on the
local economy3. While many people migrated to other parts of the country during
declines in the economy, many chose to stay. Their love of the area and its
resources, their faith in its future and their wish to maintain a chosen lifestyle
sustained and developed the various communities. Now they are joined by others
who wish to leave urban areas, for new employment opportunities and those who
want to retire or reside in an area where relaxation and recreation are accompanied
by a favorable climate.
A large percentage of the land mass of the county is under the stewardship of the
federal government in the form of the Olympic National Forest which was established
in 1897, and the Olympic National Park which was created in 1938. A significant
addition was made to the national park in 1956, in the form of an ocean corridor
which gave protection to the ocean beaches and adjacent land along the Northern
Coast of the Olympic Peninsula. Together the Olympic National Park and Olympic
National Forest form not only a world heritage site and a biosphere reserve, but also
a recreation site of international significance4.
Once again, growth is evident and inevitable. Between 1990 and 1995 the county's
population expanded by more than 4,100 people (an increase of over 25% in just five
years.) However, the rate of growth is projected to slow down. Estimates put the
county's 2000 population at around 28,200 (or an increase of about 12% in the five
year period 1995 to 2000) and at approximately 31,400 in 2005 (or an increase of
about 11 % in the five year period 2000 to 2005.)5
The purpose of this plan is to state how park, recreation and open space needs
should be addressed and implemented, for the benefit both of county residents and
for those who come to Jefferson County as visitors. The government of Jefferson
County is vested with the responsibility and authority for promoting the health,
safety, and welfare of its citizens. To that end, the County Board of Commissioners
provides this document as a means by which county residents may exercise their
independence and choose the quality of life they desire for their community for this
generation and those to come. In addition, the Port of Port Townsend is authorized
to provide and operate park and recreation facilities when such facilities enhance
water access, air passenger terminals and other port facilities.
3 In 1957, a juvenile treatment center was established at Fort Worden. In 1971, the center was
closed, and today Fort Worden is a state park. Fort Flagler is also a state park.
4 Through the Washington State Dept., of Ecology and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration a proposed Washington Outer Coast National Marine Sanctuary and Northern Puget
Sound Marine Sanctuary have been proposed to protect marine resources.
S Watterson West Group, draft population forecast for Jefferson County, February 1.1995.
. VOI-
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
21 r AL; 774 Chapter 1: Intr~d~~tion & Purpose
CHAPTER 2
THE PLANNING PROCESS
In 1988, the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners established the Jefferson
County Parks Advisory Board as a non-paid citizen advisory group to make ongoing
recommendations regarding the use, acquisition and development of parks within
Jefferson County. The board was established as a seven member board, with the
members drawing lots of one, two or three years for their initial term of office, with
subsequent terms of three years for incoming members. The board is composed of
members from all three commissioner districts. Each commissioner district is
equalized by geographic boundaries to represent approximately the same number of
citizens.
The primary responsibility of the Parks Advisory Board is to give policy-oriented
recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners. It is also the responsibility
of the Parks Advisory Board to make recommendations to the Planning Commission,
the Port of Port Townsend, and the City of Port Townsend. The staff of the Public
Works Department, Planning Department, Port of Port Townsend, City of Port
Townsend and the Jefferson County Parks & Recreation Department provide the
Board of County Commissioners and the Parks Advisory Board with administrative and
technical planning assistance.
A Parks Comprehensive Plan is defined as a set of policies and proposals adopted by
the various local governments which serve in:
0
Defining specific projects and project goals.
0
Reflecting the desires and needs of the county citizens as expressed through
community involvement by survey and public meetings and workshops.
0
Coordinating County programs and services by cooperation with State, Federal,
and local agencies.
0
A source of reference to aid in developing, correlating, and coordinating official
regulations and guidelines.
0
To obtain funding for parks and recreational needs and projects.
0
Promoting the general welfare of the citizens of the County.
VOL
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
2~ 1 '"H;: 77~' Chapter 2: The Planning Process
r r, -J 2 - I
The plan will address:
0
Specific capital improvement projects.
0
Public survey and public meeting results.
0
The location and services of all park and recreation facilities.
0
Park, recreation and open space philosophy.
0
Recommendations to implement park and recreation goals.
0
Conservation of natural resources.
Once adopted, a comprehensive plan can be revised and updated in total or on a
topic-by-topic basis. The planning program for Jefferson County will continually
strive for the highest degree of public involvement. No plan, policy or program can
truly be successful unless it represents the values or opinions of county citizens who
make their values and opinions known. It is the hope of the Board of County
Commissioners, Parks Advisory Board, Port of Port Townsend and City of Port
Townsend that the people of Jefferson County will take every opportunity to
participate in all phases of the planning program and in any matter which affects
future growth and development of the county.
Process for Adoption of the Parks Comprehensive Plan: The plan will be reviewed in
a series of public forums, located in no fewer than five strategic geographic areas of
the county. After completion of the public forums, the Jefferson County Planning
Commission will conduct at least one public meeting on the plan. The plan will then
be reviewed for adoption by the Board of County Commissioners in a public hearing.
Process for Amending the Parks Comprehensive Plan: The plan may be amended by
initiation of the Parks Advisory Board, any County agency, or any citizen or citizen
group request. All amendments to the plan will be incorporated in the schedule for
Annual Update of the Parks Comprehensive Plan as shown below. Amendments
should be reviewed for consistency with current community plans and the County
Comprehensive Plan. Amendments may be presented at any time during the year to
the Parks Advisory Board, but only those presented before March of any given year
will be incorporated in the current year's plan.
Process for Update of the Parks Comprehensive Plan: The "Capital Improvement",
"Action Plan", and "Demands and Needs" sections of the plan should be updated
annually to reflect the current demands, needs and trends by the public, as well as
any amendments deemed necessary by the Parks Advisory Board. The plan, in its
entirety, should be updated every five years.
. VOL
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
21 rAG~ 773 Chapter 2: The Planning Process
2-2
-
GMA and the Parks Comprehensive Plan: During the period 1993-1995, the Board
of County Commissioners invited citizens to participate in the county's Growth
Management Act (GMA) planning process; 12 discreet community planning groups
were formed representing the communities of Brinnon, Quilcene, Lake Leland,
Discovery Bay, Quimper, Tri-Area, Marrowstone Island, North Port Ludlow, Port
Ludlow, Paradise Bay, Shine, and the West End. Input from these groups regarding
parks issues is incorporated into the Annual Update of the Comprehensive Plan, and
these groups are, and should continue to be used as, a valuable tool for receiving
public input.
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
21 r.~r); 777 . Chapter 2: The Planning Process
. 2-3
'.'JOL
CHAPTER 3
JEFFERSON COUNTY AND ITS RESOURCES
LOCATION BOUNDARIES, SIZE'
Jefferson County is located on the northern portion of Washington's Olympic
Peninsula. The county is bounded on the west by the Pacific Ocean, and on the east
by the waters of Admiralty Inlet and Hood Canal. On the north it adjoins Clallam
County, and on the south Mason and Gray's Harbor Counties. The county is 1,805
square miles in size, making it the eighteenth largest of the state's thirty-nine
counties.
LANDFORMS and GEOLOGY
Physically, the county consists of three distinct geographic areas: the West End on
the Pacific Ocean, the Olympic Mountains in the Central Region, and the Puget
Lowlands in the eastern section. The Olympic Mountains are by far the dominant
landform of the county, occupying more that three-quarters of its total land mass.
The range includes Mount Olympus (7,965 feet), the highest point on the Olympic
Peninsula. Occupying the majority of the land area in the range are the Olympic
National Forest and the Olympic National Park.
Because the Olympics were uplifted as a dome, rather than as a ridge, the river
systems which developed radiate out in all directions from the center. The major river
systems draining into the Pacific on the West End are the Hoh, the Clearwater, and
the Queets. Draining north into the Strait of Juan de Fuca are the Elwha and the
Dungeness, both of which originate in Jefferson County, but pass through Clallam
County. The major rivers emptying into Admiralty Inlet and Hood Canal in eastern
Jefferson County are the Duckabush, the Dosewallips, the Big Quilcene, and the Little
Quilcene. Snow Creek, Salmon Creek, and Eagle Creek drain into Discovery Bay.
Glaciers, both mountain and continental, have been the primary sculptors of the
highlands and lowlands of Jefferson County. While their influence on the topography
is apparent, their less obvious impact on soils, geology, and ground water conditions
is equally important. At least four separate glaciers have invaded the Puget Lowland,
leaving behind a complex series of sediments up to 2,000 feet thick.
The two primary types of glacial deposits are "outwash" and "lodgement till".
Outwash consists of unconsolidated sand, gravel, and rocks which results from the
I See Appendix A for map showing Jefferson County
~VOL
21 f'AG~ 778
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3 - 1
runoff of melting glaciers. Outwash is usually quite loose and highly permeable.
Lodgement till consists of unsorted clay, sand, gravel, and rock which has been
compacted by the weight of the glacier into a highly impervious concrete-like material.
Due to the advance and decline of several glaciers, these layers of outwash and till
may overlap one another, and may run in different directions.
In the West End, the foothills of the Olympics consists primarily of both glacial till and
outwash. Glaciation in this area was limited to mountain types, since the rugged
mountains kept the lower level continental glaciers well away from the coast. In
addition to the outwash and till, the valley floors of the three major river basins in the
West End consists largely of alluvial deposits.
The Olympics themselves, in the center of the Peninsula, are composed of ancient
sedimentary and meta-sedimentary rock. The eastern portion of the range, from near
the Little Ouilcene River south to the county line, consist of more recent basaltic rock,
a volcanic formation.
The geology of the northeast portion of the county, a part of the Puget Lowlands, is
somewhat more complex. The substrata is again primarily sedimentary or basaltic
bedrock, but is frequently overlaid with various types of glacial deposits at differing
depths.
Basaltic rock outcroppings are evident from Mats Mats to Chimacum, and also occur
in a strip just west of the southerly tip of Discovery Bay. The area west of a line
between Irondale and Ouilcene Bay consists primarily of sedimentary rock. Also in
this category is a strip running from about the middle of Discovery Bay west to the
Clallam County line.
The remaining half of the Puget Lowland area, or northeast portion of the county, is
composed primarily of glacial till and outwash. This includes most of the major
peninsulas and islands, specifically the Ouimper, Miller, Toandos, and Bolton
Peninsulas; and Indian and Marrowstone Islands. Also included is the central portion
of eastern Jefferson County, roughly from Chimacum Ridge and Port Ludlow south
to Dabob Bay and Hood Canal.
The geology, or parent material, which underlies the soils of Jefferson County can
playa vital role in the planning of both private and public developments. Geologic
characteristics which are important include: slope stability and landslide potential,
compressibility, liquid waste disposal, ground water sources, and deposits of
minerals. Maps and information relating to these characteristics are available in the
office of the Jefferson County Development Review Division2. The data are useful for
2 In 1993, the Jefferson County Planning & Building Department was reorganized into the (Long
Range) Planning Dept., the Development Review Division (DRD), and the Building Dept.
!\'OL
?'1 ".,:77Q
..... I" ..'
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3-2
under a rich covering of plant life.
Soil scientists from the U.S. Soil Conservation Service recently completed a soil
survey of Jefferson County. This survey named, categorized and classified some 101
specific soil types in the 10 major soil associations found in the county. From this
survey and other publications, the Jefferson County Planning Department developed
seven soil interpretive maps including: suitability for septic tanks and drainfields;
slope; depth to seasonal water table; ponding and flooding; aquifer recharge potential;
agricultural suitability; and woodland suitability. Knowledge of soil characteristics and
capabílities can assist in wise public and private investments, and can be useful in
determining suitability of land for various uses. These soil interpretive maps,
however, are not to be substituted for specific on-site field inspections which may
produce findings somewhat different from the more general accounts. It should also
be noted that even some of the most severe soil limitations can be overcome by
engineering techniques. Soil interpretive maps for the county are available for
viewing at the Jefferson County Development Review Division.
Suitability for Septic Tanks and Draintields' The classification of soil suitability for
septic tank and drainfield systems considers soil properties that may inhibit the proper
functioning of these systems by affecting both effluent absorption and decomposition,
and/or the construction and operation of the system.
Due to the particular geologic formation of eastern Jefferson County only a small
portion, approximately 10% of the entire area, has soil characteristics which are well-
suited for the proper functioning of septic tank and drainfield systems. Of this 10%
less than 1 % is categorized as having "no limitations." The remaining 9% falls within
the "moderately suited" category.
Most of these preferred soils are found on the Quimper Peninsula, as far south as
Chimacum. There are two areas of significant size which are well suited or have "no
limitations" for septic tanks and drainfields. The forest area is within the corporate
limits of Port Townsend, an area presently serviced with public sewers. The second
area lies near the town of Chimacum encompassing approximately one square mile.
A few other small areas of these most preferred soil characteristics are scattered
about the Quimper Peninsula.
Aside from the Quimper Peninsula, only moderately suited soils are intermittently
found, the greatest concentration of these are located in the Shine area.
Depth to Seasonal Water Table' Depth to seasonal water table is a measurement
from the surface of the ground to the water table that occurs during the wet months
of the year. A shallow depth between the ground surface and the water table may
cause both foundation and septic tank effluent disposal problems. A high seasonal
water table may inhibit septic tank effluent from being properly decomposed in the
~VOL
21 78'1Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
t'AG~ UChapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3-4
soil. It may also cause foundations to "float" on their footings resulting in structural
damage to buildings.
Glacially cemented hardpan layers and shallow depth to bedrock account for the large
portion (approximately half) of eastern Jefferson County having a rather shallow
depth to seasonal water table, (zero to three feet below the ground level). Since
slope gradients play an important role in determining surface run-off, these areas of
shallow seasonal water tables are generally the more level areas within the County.
Pondin'g: When the seasonal water table rises above the surface of the land, ponding
occurs. Areas of ponding are almost exclusively found in low areas, such as the
West and Chimacum Valleys, or in depressions in the land profile, such as areas
surrounding lakes and ponds. Small areas of ponding are located intermittently about
the County, with large concentrations located in the inland and river valleys.
Flooding occurs when a spring, stream or river over-runs its banks or channels. In
river and stream valleys the area most regularly flooded is called the floodplain. As
identified on soil maps, the most probable areas of flood hazards occur in eastern
Jefferson County in the floodplains of Snow Creek, the Dosewallips and Duckabush
Riyers as well as the Big and Little Quilcene Rivers. There are other areas adjacent
to springs and creeks scattered throughout the eastern portion of Jefferson County
which have been identified as having flood hazard potential. Portions of the Hoh,
Queets, and Clearwater Rivers in the West End also are subject to seasonal flooding.
Ponding and flooding, like a shallow depth to the seasonal water table, may be a
hazard to development. Property owners should take adequate measures to insure
that structural damage will not occur to buildings and roads on soils subject to
ponding and flooding, or avoid development on these soils altogether. Likewise,
septic tank and drainfield systems should not be installed in areas exhibiting these
characteristics.
Aquifer recharge potential, agriculture suitability, and woodlands suitability are soil
properties which have resource value. These soils properties are intrinsically suited
for the growing of agricultural and timber products, or for recharging ground water
aquifers.
Aquifer Recharge Potential' Aquifer recharge potential is the relative ability of the soil
and underlying geology to transport rainwater into underground aquifers. This
classification considers the water intake rate of the topsoils, the permeability of
subsoils, and parent materials. While it is not exactly known if water falling on these
areas actually reaches the aquifers that supply the many wells in the County, it is not
unreasonable to assume these areas do playa role in recharging underground water
reservoirs.
. VOL
21 rÞ~); 781
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3 - 5
Aquifer recharge areas contain some of the most permeable soils. Conflicts can arise
between the proper functioning of these soils and development. First, roof tops,
driveways, walkways, and frontage roads all reduce the amount of land surface able
to receive rainwater. Second, in areas of extreme permeability, septic tank effluent
may percolate faster than the ability of soil microorganisms to purify it, thus
increasing the chance of ground water contamination. Proper precaution should be
taken when developing on areas considered to have aquifer recharge potential so the
function of these areas may be maintained without depleting or contaminating ground
water supplies.
The ability of soils to allow replenishment of ground water reservoirs becomes an
increasingly important resource as more demand is placed on ground water for
commercial and domestic use. Large areas of high aquifer recharge potential are
found on the Quimper Peninsula, extending south as far as Center. Other notable
areas occur around Shine and West of Quilcene and Discovery Bay. Smaller areas
exhibiting this desirable characteristic are found throughout the remainder of the
eastern portion of the County.
Agricultural Suitability: The suitability of soils for agricultural production has been
classified by the Soil Conservation Service into eight categories or classes. These
categories are determined by expected crop yields and soil management techniques
required. Generally speaking, Class 1 through 4 soils produce the highest yields with
the least amount of soil management. Class 5 through 8 soils will require more costly.
soil management and lower yields can be expected. There are no Class 1 soils in
Jefferson County but there are areas of Class 2, 3, and 4 soils.
Approximately 10,250 acres of land, or about 6% of the land area in eastern
Jefferson County is classified by the U.S. Department of Agriculture as having prime
agricultural suitability (classes 2 and 5)3. Although much of this land is scattered in
small areas throughout the eastern portion of the county, there are a few areas of
significant size worth noting.
The largest concentration of prime agricultural land is found in the Snow Creek,
Chimacum and West Valley areas and around the town of Quilcene. Most of this
agricultural land is used by the dairy and livestock industry for grazing purposes.
As more demand is placed on the farmers to help supplement regional or local
community markets, the resource value of agriculturally-suited land may rise. At the
same time, however, the economics of farming and using farmland to its full potential
3 There are roughly 176,000 acres of land in eastern Jefferson County, excluding the national park
and forest. Approximately 5,500 acres are classified as prime soil 2; and approximately 4,750 acres
are classified as prime soil 5. There are no prime soils 1, 3, or 4 in eastern Jefferson County. Source:
Jefferson County IOMS, April 1995.
LVOL
21 r~G~ 782
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3-6
becomes increasingly difficult.
TOPOGRAPHY
Approximately half of the land profile in eastern Jefferson County is of slopes 15%
or greater. The greatest portion of these steeper slopes lies on the foothills of the
Olympic Mountain Range from Discovery Bay south to the Mason-Jefferson County
line. Included in this excessive slope and west edges of the Toandos Peninsula. Less
steep areas are generally beaches or plateaus, and the Quimper Peninsula.
Detailed slope conditions are depicted on maps and charts available at the Jefferson
County Development Review Division.
CLiMA TE
Although Jefferson County is located within the West Coast Marine Climatic Region,
there are significant variations in climate within the county. Five distinct climatic
zones have been identified, which vary with elevation, topography, rainfall and
position with respect to bodies of water and wind patterns. Some great climatic
changes occur within very short distances in the county. For example, the western
central portion of the Olympic Mountains receives some of the heaviest rainfall in the
nation, averaging above 200 inches annually in certain locations.
Port Townsend is only about 50 miles from this wet area, yet receives only about 18
inches annually. This somewhat dry northeastern area is contrasted with the
rainforests on the coast, and the alpine zones in the high Olympics. Within each of
the distinct climate zones, various species of plant and animal life have adapted more
successfully than others, resulting in a variety of forest ecosystems.
Within the inhabited lowlands, maritime air has a moderating influence throughout the
year. High temperatures in the summer ranges in the 60s and 70s; lows in the 40s
and lower 50s. In the winter, maximum temperatures are between 38 and 45
degrees Fahrenheit, and minimums, on average, from 28 to 35 degrees. While the
Cascade Mountains protect the Puget Lowland area from cold continental air masses
in the winter and excessive heat in the summer, the Olympics shield the northeastern
portion of the county from the high rainfall which occurs on the coast. A
climatological phenomenon known as the "Olympic Rain Shadow" is an area centered
north of Port Townsend, resulting in the driest coastal region north of southern
California. The northeastern portion of Jefferson County, on the fringe of the rain
shadow, receives approximately 16 inches of rainfall annually, less than half that of
Seattle. The area between Port Townsend and Port Angeles is considered to be, by
many, the most desirable climate in the Pacific Northwest, both for residential and
recreational purposes.
VOL
21 r,~r~ 783
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3 - 7
FLOODPLAINS
Jefferson County has seven major river systems which are subject to seasonal
flooding. Four of these are located in the eastern section of the county (Duckabush,
Dosewallips, Big Ouilcene, and Little Ouilcene), and three in the West End (Hoh,
Clearwater, and Oueets). Jefferson County is a participant in the National Flood
Insurance program which makes federally-subsidized flood damage insurance available
to property owners at reasonable low rates.
A county-wide flood control zone is divided into two flood control subzone districts:
Brinnon (for the Dosewallips River) and Ouilcene (for the Big Ouilcene River). In
February, 1989, the Board adopted the Flood Plain Management Ordinance.
Currently, flood plain management plans for the Big Ouilcene and Dosewallips rivers
are undergoing public review and will be adopted sometime in 1995.
STORMWATER
In 1990, the county drafted a Storm Water Management Strategy, with funding
through the Department of Ecology's Centennial Clean Water Act monies. This
strategy was never formally adopted. Currently, staff is developing a stormwater
management plan which incorporates the Department of Ecology Stormwater Manual.
It is anticipated that this latest ordinance will be adopted in 1995.
SHORELINES
One of Jefferson County's most outstanding assets is its many miles of both fresh
and salt water shoreline. The history, the present, and the future of the county are
closely linked to its shorelines, much of which still remains in a natural or relatively
undeveloped state.
In Eastern Jefferson County, there are about 170 miles of marine shoreline along
Discovery Bay, the Straits of Juan de Fuca, Admiralty Inlet, and Hood Canal. Only
about 15 miles of these are in public ownership and accessible to the general public.
This includes county or state parks at Fort Worden, Old Fort Townsend, Fort Flagler,
Oak Bay, Indian Island, Bywater Bay, Termination Point, the Dosewallips River, and
Pleasant Harbor. There is a national forest campground at Seal Rock on Hood Canal.
There are also publicly owned boat launches at Gardiner, Lower Port Hadlock, Mats,
Shine, Quilcene, and Port Townsend.
The approximately 30 miles of Pacific Ocean shoreline of Western Jefferson County
is predominantly within the Olympic National Park and managed by the National Park
Service. Most of the remainder falls within the boundaries of the Ouinault and Hoh
Indian Nations.
. VOL
21 rA~~ 784
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3 - 8
significance that should be managed to protect the state-wide interest of all citizens,
preserve the natural character, resources, and ecology of the shoreline, provide long
term benefits, and increase public access to public lands and public recreational
opportunities.
In the implementation of this policy, the public's opportunity to enjoy the
physical and aesthetic qualities of natural shorelines of the state shall be
preserved to the greatest extent feasible ... and uses shall be preferred which are
consistent with control of pollution and prevention of damage to the natural
environment, or which are unique to or dependent upon use of the state's
shoreline. Alterations of the natural condition of the shorelines of the state, in
those limited instances when authorized, shall be given priority for single family
residences, ports, shoreline recreational uses... and... improvements facilitating
public access to shorelines, industrial and commercial developments which are
particularly water-dependent...and other development that will provide an
opportunity for substantial numbers of the people to enjoy the shorelines...
In Jefferson County these shorelines of state-wide significance are all marine waters
below extreme low tide, the intertidal areas and adjoining shorelines of Hood Canal,
and portions of the Hoh, Bogachiel, and Clearwater Rivers.
The shorelines of Jefferson County fall under the jurisdiction of the Jefferson County
Shoreline Management Master Program, the mandates of the Washington State
Department of Ecology, the Department of Natural Resources, Washington State
Fisheries and the Washington State Department of Fisheries. The Master Program
contains an inventory of shoreline natural characteristics and land use patterns,
statements of goals, policies, and performance standards to protect shoreline
resources and manage development in the shoreline jurisdiction, and provisions for
developing and administering a permit system for shoreline developments. The
Jefferson County Shoreline Advisory Commission is a nine-member citizen board that
advises the Board of County Commissioners on issues or shoreline permits and the
Shoreline Master Program. The Shoreline Advisory Commission is staffed by the
Jefferson County Planning Department.
We are fortunate, in Jefferson County, to live in close proximity to rich and varied
shorelines. Our social, cultural, spiritual, economic, and political values are deeply
influenced by the values and functions of our shorelines. Along with our neighbors,
other citizens of the state, and, indeed, even national and international groups, we
recognize the significance of Jefferson County's shoreline resources. It is a resource
of tremendous value, which "belongs" to no one, but to everyone and therefore, we
should in turn hold in trust for the future.
WILDLIFE AND MARINE RESOURCES
Prior to the appearance of Europeans on the Peninsula, all indigenous fish, shellfish,
VOL
21 [,A.'.; 785
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3 - 10
and wildlife were abundant in their undisturbed natural habitat. The local Indians
found these resources so plentiful that they had no need to cultivate crops; a large
variety of natural foods was readily available.
Soon after the first white settlers came, the area's population began to put pressures
on the natural fish and wildlife resources. As early as 1871 laws were passed to
restrict salmon fishing. By 1909 excessive hunting threatened the west coast elk
with extinction. The once abundant Olympic wolf disappeared from the Peninsula
about 1930. The diverse ecosystems of the Olympic National Park and Olympic
Nationål Forest provide one of the few remaining sanctuaries for some species whose
habitats are threatened elsewhere in the nation and in the world.
In total there are 60 species of mammals, 82 species of resident birds, and 220
varieties of migratory birds on the Olympic Peninsula.
The fish and wildlife resources of Jefferson County are of substantial recreational and
economic consequence. The Washington State Wildlife Department has a game-
planting program, and both State and federal fisheries agencies maintain research,
rearing, and stocking programs in Jefferson County.
Game in the county includes blacktail deer, elk, black bear, mountain goat, cougar,
pheasant, California quail, mountain quail, cottontail and snowshoe rabbits, band-
tailed pigeon, beaver, muskrat, mink, river otter, marten, weasel, skunk, bobcat,
coyote, and raccoon.
Major waterfowl species include ducks: mallard, pintail, canvasback, ruddy, harlequin,
ringnecked, wood duck, redhead, old squaw, buffiehead, widgeon, scaup, goldeneye,
green-winged teal, brant, and shoveler; geese: Canada, lesser Canada, snow,
cackling, and white-fronted geese. Merganser, scoter, common snipe, American
coot, and whistling swan occur in lesser numbers. Eastern Jefferson County has an
active Audubon Society, the Admiralty Audubon Society.
The principal species of anadromous fish are chinook, coho, pink, chum, and sockeye
salmon, and steelhead, cut-throat, and Dolly Varden trout. Resident freshwater fish
include rainbow, cut-throat, brook, golden, Dolly Varden, and lake trout, as well as
grayling, mountain whitefish, kokanee, warmouth, bluegill, black crappie,
pumpkinseed, brown bullhead, yellow perch, and largemouth, smallmouth, and rock
bass. Important marine fish are Pacific halibut, Pacific herring, albacore, raffish,
skate, surf smelt, dogfish, Pacific hake, and numerous species of sole and rockfish.
The beaches and estuaries contain Pacific and native oysters, Dungeness crab, rock
and Puget Sound pink scallops, kamchka or pinto abalone, several species of shrimp,
and littleneck, horse, jackknife, butter, Japanese littleneck, geoduck, softshell, and
cockle clams.
.'.'OL
21 r~r; 786
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3 - 11
In 1976 a marine resource inventory was performed throughout Jefferson County.
As a result of this study, the distribution of marine organisms and their habitats were
mapped, and are available for review in the Jefferson County Development Review
Division. One element mapped, the Bivalve Mollusks, includes subtidal hardshell
clams, intertidal clams, and geoducks, potential Pacific oyster hatching areas, Pacific
oyster optimal spawn areas, and oyster infestation areas. Another element, the
Crustacean, includes the distribution of crab and shrimp. Surf smelt, true cod,
English sole, and herring spawn areas are depicted on an additional map.
These .upland activities have important impact on these marine resource areas. For
example, the leaching of septic tank effluent or siltation caused by soil excavation
may disrupt or degrade marine habitats. These habitats are important food producers
locally, nationally, and internationally. Therefore, the preservation of these marine
resources by proper planning is critical. The Jefferson County Health Department
takes an active role in preservation of water quality, its enhancement, and education
of the public. Also providing leadership in water quality is the Puget Sound Water
Quality Authority and the Hood Canal Coordinating Council. In 1990, the Department
of Ecology, through the Centennial Clean Water Act, provided grant monies to
Jefferson County for Water Quality Management and Storm Water Management.
Since 1982, the Port Townsend Marine Science Center at Fort Worden State Park
has enhanced awareness of marine ecology through school programs, live animal
displays, public interpretive programs, slide shows, films, and lectures.
DOMESTIC WATER/PUBliC RESOURCES
The two primary providers of water in Jefferson County are PUD No.1, and the City
of Port Townsend.
Abundant quantities of good quality surface water are available from the major rivers
which wind their way from the Olympic Mountains into Hood Canal. The ability to
develop them as sources of domestic supply is limited by two major factors: costs of
transmission over the many miles of irregular terrain to areas of need, and limited
water rights. The only sizable domestic system using surface water at the present
time is the Olympic Gravity System, which has withdrawal stations on both the Big
and Little Quilcene Rivers. From this system the City of Port Townsend is allotted
five million gallons per day by contractual agreement with Port Townsend Paper
Corporation, co-owners of the original pipeline. Port Townsend Paper reserves all
excess water for its present and future needs at its craft paper mill outside of Port
Townsend. Of the five million gallons per day allocated to the City system, one
million gallons daily is permitted to be diverted to the Tri-Area region (Chimacum, Port
Hadlock, Irondale), and is divided between residences served by Jefferson County
P.U.D. and the City of Port Townsend Utilities Department. Of this volume, 100,000
gallons per day is contractUally obligated to the U.S. Navy's Conventional Ordnance
II" ,
.i,;'.
21 r~ri 787
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3 - 12
Facility at Indian Island. A portion of the Tri-Area supply also is furnished to Fort
Flagler State Park and the Marrowstone Fish Laboratory.
The remainder of small, private systems in the county, and most individual supplies,
are from ground water sources.
Several problems currently exist with respect to ground water. Where peat bogs
exist in recharge areas or around aquifers, the organic material tends to make the
water slightly acid. The acidity enables the water to dissolve minerals, therefore the
water 'has excessive mineral content, notably iron. In order to have satisfactory
drinking water, expensive treatment is often necessary. This problem commonly
exists in the Tri-Area vicinity.
A second ground water problem arises when excessive pumping of limited supplies
is conducted near shoreline areas. Freshwater wells turn brackish as salt water
intrudes in the ground water aquifer. During summer, due to an influx of seasonal
residents and increased use of water for garden purposes, this problem often is more
acute.
As the population of eastern Jefferson County continues to increase, an obvious need
exists for a comprehensive study of local ground water resources. Until such a study
is conducted and a plan formulated for ground water development, water supplies will
continue to be a constraint to sound public and private development investments and
the health and welfare of the community.
The only plan currently in existence is the Coordinated Water System Plan, was
developed in 1989 and updated in 1995. This plan identifies public water systems
and their boundaries in the county, and procedures for systems outside of the defined
boundaries.
COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES
Water Supply Systems' As described in the previous section, the Olympic Gravity
Water System is eastern Jefferson County's main community water facility. Its
primary service area is the City of Port Townsend and the communities of Port
Hadlock, Irondale, and Chimacum.
Three small public water districts have been formed in Paradise Bay, Coyle, and
Rocky Point. The balance of county residents beyond the Olympic Gravity Water
System and the various water districts rely either on individual wells, or small private
community systems.
The Jefferson County P.U.D. No.1 operates several systems throughout the county
at: Glen Cove, Glen Cove South, Hastings Loop South, Gardiner, Triton Cove, Lazy
~VOL
21 rAG:: 788
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3 - 13
C. Currently under design is a system at Bywater Bay
Sewage Disposal Systems: Currently there are seven sanitary sewage systems in the
county, although some are for special purpose use and are not available for public
domestic disposal. Existing systems include those located at the City of Port
Townsend, the Port Townsend Paper Company mill, Port Ludlow, Indian Island (U.S.
Navy), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's laboratory at Marrowstone Island,
Oueets/Clearwater, and Cape George.
Nearly' all residents in the unincorporated area of the county rely upon conventional
septic tanks and drainfields. Problems regarding soil suitability for septic tanks
indicate that future, intensive residential development may be required to provide
sanitary sewer systems, or new, innovative sewage disposal units rather than
conventional septic tanks.
Electric Power: The eastern portion of Jefferson County is serviced primarily by
Puget Sound Power and Light Company (Puget Power). Mason County P.U.D. #1
serves the community of Brinnon from a point south of Mount Walker. Clallam
County P.U.D. and Gray's Harbor P.U.D. provide service to the residents of west
Jefferson County.
In 1990 there were approximately 10,200 customers being served by the Puget
Power. As of February 1995, Puget Power had approximately 13,350 customers of
record in Jefferson County. In 1990 Mason County P.U.D. #1 serviced approximately
1,200 users in the southern portion of eastern Jefferson County; by March 1995 just
over 1 ,400 customers were served5.
Telephone: Telephone service is provided by U.S. West, Sprint/United Telephone,
and Pacific Telecom Companies. The U.S. West service area is divided into two
regions: Port Townsend and Port Ludlow. In 1990, approximately 7,800 connections
served the Port Townsend area (prefixes 385 and 379); and Port Ludlow (prefix 437)
had approximately 1,400 connections. As of January 1995, Port Townsend service
had grown to over 10,000 connections, warranting a new prefix (301); Port Ludlow
service area had approximately 2,000 connections. Sprint/United currently provides
service to the remainder of eastern Jefferson County (i.e., Brinnon, Ouilcene, Center,
and Gardiner). In December 1994, it serviced 2,799 connections in Jefferson
County, up from 2,175 lines in December, 1989. Pacific Telecom provides service
to the Clearwater vicinity on the West End. In 1990, there were 90 connections in
the Clearwater vicinity; in March 1995 that number had grown to 1266. (Note: these
figures include all connections: business, residential, fax, etc.)
5 Information provided by Puget Sound Power & Light and Mason County PUD #1, respectively.
6 Information provided by US West, Sprint/United Telephone and Pacific Telecom, respectively.
. VO,~
21 r.~~= 789
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3 - 14
Schools' There are eleven schools in the county's five school districts: two K-8, one
K-12, three elementary, one junior high, two middle schools (including Blue Heron,
which will open Fall 1995), and two high schools. Peninsula College, a community
college which has its main campus in Port Angeles, maintains a Learning Laboratory
in Port Townsend, and offers limited class selection for seniors and night students.
The nearest four year colleges are located to the east, across Puget Sound.
Cultural and Recreational Activities' Port Townsend is the focal point for cultural
activities in the county and on the Peninsula. The city is rich in its architectural
heritage and engaging history. Many historic sites and buildings have been restored,
and there are a number of museums. In 1972 the Washington State Arts Commission
declared Fort Worden a State-wide center for arts and recreation. Programs
coordinated by Centrum' at the Fort include performance of plays, music festivals,
workshops, and seminars for writers, dancers, and musicians. Extensive renovation
to the Fort's balloon hangar was begun in 1989 and completed in 1991, transforming
it into a performing arts centers.
)
In addition to the recreational facilities and historic sites at Fort Worden, the county
is blessed with many natural resources which accommodate a variety of recreational
pursuits including fishing, hunting, shellfish harvesting, sailing, hiking, camping,
bicycling, and horseback riding. Park and recreation facilities are operated by the
City, County, State, and federal government, and the Port of Port Townsend. The
constantly increasing recreational activity in the area is testimony that Jefferson
County's diversity of natural resources are some of the finest in the area.
libraries' The Carnegie Library in Port Townsend was built in 1913. Completed in
June 1990, an extensive renovation and expansion project was funded by a State
grant, corporate, public and private donations. The five members of the Board of
Trustees are appointed by the Mayor and City Council, and serve five year terms.
The library has an active and supportive "Friends of the Library".
The Jefferson County Rural Library District was established by voters in 1978, to
provide library services to the unincorporated areas of the county. Operating funds
are provided by a levy on property within the county (excepting the City of Port
Townsend). The five members of the Board of Trustees are appointed for five year
terms by the County Commissioners. The library is located in Port Hadlock. A
bookmobile provides regular library services to the outlying areas of the County.
7 Centrum was established in 1973. and is a nonprofit organization located at Fort Worden State
Park that sponsors an array of arts festival. workshops and performances.
8 Jefferson County and City of Port Townsend funds were donated to the State Parks and
Recreation Commission for this project.
~VOL
21 rAC~ 79~
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3 - 15
, t"
'. .
In 1978 the voters of Jefferson County established a rural library district, approving
a levy to provide library service to the residents of unincorporated areas in Jefferson
County. In 1985, a 5,000 square foot library building was constructed in Port
Hadlock. The County library operates one Bookmobile, which serves the eastern
portion of the county, while the West End is served, under contract, by neighboring
library districts.
Human Resource Services: The Clallam-Jefferson County Community Action Council
(C.A.C:) has objectives aimed at serving a broad spectrum of human resource needs.
Among C.A.C. 's goals are vocational training, job counselling, educational growth for
low income families, expansion of low cost housing, provision of emergency shelters,
attention to problems of Indian-Americans, improvement of nutrition for senior citizens
and low income families, provision of better health services for low income persons,
improvement of income opportunities for senior citizens, staffing and operation of a
Head Start program for culturally disadvantaged children, and operation of the Retired
Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP). Head Start, the nutrition program, and RSVP are
among the more noticeable programs currently in operation. A sizable share of the
work done by C.A.C. is done on a volunteer basis.
In January and February, 1987, C.A.C. conducted a needs assessment survey. The
results of this survey were published in a detailed report available through Community
Action Council.
Public Transportation: Jefferson Transit operates a local transit system in eastern
Jefferson County. Services include connections with Clallam Transit in Sequim, and
Kitsap Transit in Poulsbo. Additional services include Dial-A-Ride, van pools, local
freight delivery, charter buses, and carpool assistance; and in late 1995, the Haines
Place Park & Ride will be in operation. Key City Transport provides taxi service in
Port Townsend and the Tri-Area.
Health Care: County medical services are centered in two clinics in Port Townsend,
where approximately twelve physicians maintain practices. In addition, other
physicians maintain private offices within Port Townsend and other unincorporated
areas of the county. Jefferson General Hospital in Port Townsend is the only hospital
in the county.
Each Fire District within the county has its own aid car and qualified Emergency
Medical Technicians (EMT), except for District 6, Cape George, which maintains a
mutual aid agreement with the City of Port Townsend Fire District for aid car and EMT
services. A private nursing home also operated in the City of Port Townsend.
Out patient offices are maintained in the city by the Jefferson County Health service.
Jefferson County Human Services includes mental health, counselling, and drug and
alcohol abuse program services.
"VOL
21 '.,~7f'.
r,.,,' vL
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3 - 16
Airport Services: Air transportation is accommodated through Jefferson County
International Airport and a number of private airstrips. The county's airport is publicly
owned and operated by the Port of Port Townsend. Located approximately five miles
south of the City of Port Townsend, the airport was acquired by the County in 1947
and transferred to the Port District in 1959. The County Airport serves as a base for
60 aircraft. An airplane charter service functions from the airport, with operations
that extend from Canada to Oregon. Facilities at Jefferson County Airport include a
3,000 foot runway, an industrial site, six permanent hangars and several portable
hangars, and aviation fuel facilities. A new paved and widened runway/taxiway
system was completed in 1990.
Port Facilities: After the decline of the clipper ship days, docking facilities for large
ships gradually decayed in Port Townsend. The major deep water off-loading facility
is located at the Port Townsend Paper Mill. At present the Port of Port Townsend
harbor facilities accommodate moorage for pleasure craft and fishing vessels. Other
Port facilities include Quilcene Boat Haven, Point Hudson, Mats Mats Boat Launch,
Gardiner Boat Launch, Port Hadlock Boat Launch, and the Quincy Street Dock. The
Port rents to the public moorage for 540 commercial and recreational vessels, and
makes available marine fuel, haul-out facilities for vessels up to 70 tons, and dry boat
storage for over 160 vessels.
COUNTY GOVERNMENT and SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS
County Government. Jefferson County is a "general purpose" unit of local
government: a municipal corporation and a subdivision of the state of Washington.
Its powers and responsibilities are limited to those which have been vested by the
State. The Board of County Commissioners is both the legislative and executive
branch of Jefferson County government. It is the County Commissioners who adopt
official county plans, policies, ordinances, and regulations. Three county
commissioners represent individual districts of equally divided population, but who are
elected by voters from the entire county. They serve four-year terms of office. The
Commissioners are assisted by their appointed departments: Planning, Development
Review, Building, Public Works, and Health.
Another vital part of county government are the services provided by the staffs of the
other elected officials: auditor, assessor, sheriff, court clerk, treasurer, and
prosecuting attorney. Although these county officials are independently elected, the
Board of County Commissioners maintains a continuity in county government by
being the executive focal point and by their authority over the county budget.
Advisory Committees' Of increasing importance to effective county government are
the non-salaried citizen advisory committees appointed by the Board of County
Commissioners.
.VOL
21 r~G; 792
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3 - 17
The Jefferson County Planning Commission comprises nine citizen members,
appointed for 4-year terms and equally representing the three county commissioner
districts. Legally constituted in accordance with the State Planning Enabling Act
(RCW 38.70), the Planning Commission advises the Board of County Commissioners
regarding rezones, ordinances, and amendments to the comprehensive plan. The
Planning Commission is the major policy advisor to the County Commissioners with
respect to the County Comprehensive Plan and land development. The Planning
Commission is staffed by the County Planning Department.
The Shoreline Management Advisory Commission (S.M.A.C.) is a group of citizens
appointed by the Board of County Commissioners for 3-year terms, who are required
to have geographic diversity with respect to their place or residence in the county.
The Commission's major responsibility is to advise the County Commissioners
regarding specific proposed shoreline development projects. In addition, S.M.A.C. is
the primary policy-advisor with respect to marine resources and the integrity of the
Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program. The S.M.A.C. is staffed
by the Public Works Department.
The Solid Waste Advisory Committee (S.W.A.C.) is a legislatively mandated body
composed of nine members appointed by the Board of County Commissioners.
S.W.A.C. terms are for two year periods. The S.W.A.C. is charged with updating the
Solid Waste Management Plan, and the Hazardous Waste Management Plan. It also
makes recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners in matters of fee
structure, recycling and waste reduction planning, and solid waste handling. The
S.W.A.C. is staffed by the County Public Works Department, and the County Health
Department.
The Parks Advisory Board (P.A.B.) is appointed by the County Commissioners for
varying terms of one, two, or three years, determined by lot. The P.C.B. updates the
Parks Comprehensive Plan, and makes recommendations to the County Commission
on issues of land acquisition, parks development and planning, recreation planning,
and fee structure. The P.A.B. is staffed by members of the County Public Works
Department, and the County Parks & Recreation Department,
School Districts: There are five school districts in Jefferson County serving Port
Townsend, Chimacum, Ouilcene, Brinnon, and Oueets/Clearwater. Each district is
governed by a school board composed of five persons who serve four-year terms
once elected. School board members must be registered voters and be residents of
the school district in which they serve. The boards set operational policy and employ
a staff of teachers and administrators to provide an educational program for the
children that live in the district. They must adhere to State law and the rules and
regulations established by the State Board of Education. All school districts in
Jefferson County are presently accredited by the State Board of Education.
.VOl
21 79""'"
~4 ( - -,
. ",;<~ ',JI
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3 - 18
Local school districts are assisted in carrying out their responsibilities by Educational
Service District #114. E.S.D. #114 is essentially a regional school office serving
Jefferson, Clallam, Kitsap, and North Mason Counties. The headquarters are located
in Bremerton.
Fire Protection Di~tricts: There are currently six fire districts in Jefferson County:
Chimacum/Marrowstone, Quilcene, Brinnon, Port Ludlow, Discovery Bay, and
Quimper Peninsula/Cape George. Fire districts are created by a vote of the people
within district boundaries for, as State law authorizes, "The elimination of fire hazards
and for the protection of life and property in territories outside of cities." Each district
is governed by three resident, non-salaried, elected commissioners who serve for six-
year terms. The fire-fighting teams comprise local volunteers. Community support
through tax revenues and by participation in fire district fund-raising activities is very
important to the success of the various fire districts.
Water Districts: There are three water districts in Jefferson County which were
created by a vote of the people within the district boundaries: Coyle, Paradise Bay,
and Rocky Point. State law specified that water districts "are for the acquisition,
construction, maintenance, operation, development, and regulation of a water supply
system and providing additions and betterments thereto." Each district is served by
three commissioners.
Sewer Di~tricts: There is presently one sewer district in Jefferson County: the Cape.
George Sewer District. The sanitary sewer system in Port Townsend is operated by
the City, and a system at Port Ludlow is owned and operated by Pope Resources, Inc.
Drainage Districts: The only existing drainage district in Jefferson County, is
Chimacum District #1. Although its governing body is by law a board of three
commissioners each serving a six-year term, District #1 presently has no elected
board and is not active.
Ho~pital Districts' There are two hospital districts in Jefferson County. District #1
serves western Jefferson County and District #2 is responsible for the operation of
Jefferson General Hospital in Port Townsend.
Hospital districts are empowered by state law "to own and operate hospitals, nursing
homes, extended care, outpatient, and rehabilitative facilities, contiguous with or thin
such facilities or hospitals, and ambulances, and to supply hospital, nursing home,
extended care, outpatient, rehabilitative, health maintenance, and ambulance service
for residents of such districts and other persons, provided that hospital districts will
not construct nursing homes when such facilities are already available."
The hospital districts are each governed by five elected commissioners who serve for
6-year terms.
~VOL
21 rAG~ 794
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3 - 19
Public Health Department: The Jefferson County Health Department provides its
services to both the City of Port Townsend and the unincorporated area of Jefferson
County. Primary responsibility of the department is related to public health and
environmental health. Among the Health Department's environmental health
responsibilities are the issuance of septic tank permits, the testing of public and
private wells for water quality, restaurant and food service inspections, subdivision
review, and site evaluation. Some of the Department's public health responsibilities
include immunization, nursing, registration of vital statistics, education, and
community health care.
Port Di~tricts: The Port of Port Townsend is the only port district in Jefferson County
and has county-wide boundaries. Port districts are created by law as "municipal
corporations" of the State. They are often referred to as "special purpose districts",
unlike counties, cities, and towns which are "general purpose corporations" because
they have general governmental authority in all matters of public concern. Almost all
powers of a port district are vested in a board of commissioners. In Washington
State, most ports have three commissioners. All serve six-year terms. The
commissioners are elected from three separate commissioner districts within the port
district.
The Port Commission is responsible for making the policies and decisions of the
district. Such policies or decisions involve adoption of plans, establishing positions
and setting employment policies, purchasing or disposing of real estate and other
property, setting rates, adopting budgets, and levying taxes.
The Port Commission sets the policies that guide the development, growth, and
operation of all the port's facilities and functions.
Port Districts are authorized by law to develop many types of facilities to provide a
variety of services. Most easily identified are the various transportation-related
amenities and those dealing with direct economic development and recreational
boating.
The Port of Port Townsend was established by a vote of the residents of Jefferson
County in 1924. The port's boundaries are contiguous with those of the County.
The largest facilities owned and operated by the Port are the Port Townsend Boat
Haven and the Jefferson County International Airport. Other Port facilities include:
Ouilcene Boat Haven, Point Hudson, Mats Mats boat launch, Port Hadlock boat
launch, Gardiner Boat Launch, and Quincy Street Dock.
Revenues for the Port come from several sources. The primary source of operating
revenue is in the form of user fees generated by Port facilities, including the Port
Townsend and Ouilcene Boat Havens, the airport, and leased properties. Another
source is a portion of the tax levy allocated to operations. Non-operating revenue is
\'[;1-
l)1 7°~
!....-.- ;":- "j-~
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3 - 20
derived from general obligation bonds, disposition of assets, interest income, and the
local timber harvest tax bond.
Industrial Development Districts: In 1966, Port Resolution 194 created an Industrial
Development District in Eastern Jefferson County, under the provisions of RCW
Chapter 53.25; this resolution was subsequently amended per resolution 196..
Public Utility District: There is one P.U.D. in Jefferson County which has been
created by a vote of the people, and its jurisdiction is county-wide. A public utility
district's purpose according to state law is to conserve the water and power
resources of the State of Washington for the benefits of the people thereof, and to
supply public utility service, including water and electricity for all uses. Three
commissioners, who must be residents and freeholders, serve 6-year terms and
represent sub-districts whose boundaries are identical to those of the Jefferson
County Board of Commissioners.
ECONOMICS
After Port Townsend's founding in 1852 (prior to Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia,
Vancouver, Walla Walla, and most other Washington cities), the initial population
surge was involved with lumber production to serve the rapidly growing San
Francisco Bay area. Port Townsend's location was logical for this activity for two
reasons: First, there were abundant supplies of excellent timber close to the.
shorelines, making the lumber relatively easy to transport. Second, Port Townsend's
position at the eastern end of the Strait of Juan de Fuca meant that it was closer to
San Francisco than any of the other cities in the Puget Sound area. Because Port
Townsend was strategically situated at the doorway to the Northwest, it became the
port of entry for the Customs District of Puget Sound in 1 854, and the area's future
seemed to be quite bright. Port Ludlow and Port Hadlock became sawmill towns, and
mills were also added at Point Hudson, Port Townsend, Discovery Bay, and
Chimacum Creek. In addition, ship building, canneries, farming, breweries, and the
Irondale Foundry all flourished. But during this period a dramatic change was taking
place in the nation's transportation system. The rapid expansion of railroads in other
parts of the country was destined to playa major role in the development of the cities
surrounding Puget Sound. During this early period, there was almost feverish
enthusiasm for the addition of rail lines, and the competition for them among the
growing cities of the Northwest was tremendous.
Jefferson County experienced its first big swell of high expectations in 1871 when
it was rumored that Northern Pacific would build an extension of its line from the
Columbia River to Port Townsend Bay. The proposed extension died with the
recession of the mid-1 870s.
Business activity picked up again in the late 1870s, and a group of local businessmen
. VOL
21 ¡',~:'; 19t)
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3 - 21
.-
,
. \,
formed a group to attract financing for a railroad line from Portland to Port Townsend.
A speculation boom hit the town in 1889, and the following year it was announced
that a subsidiary of Union Pacific Railroad would build the desired line. In response
to this announcement, and in anticipation of the surge of economic activity which
would surely follow the addition of rail transportation, the area experienced a
fantastic boom. Population levels soared, and construction began on a number of
two- and three-story brick buildings on Water Street. The facilities in the town were
designed to accommodate an eventual population of 20,000 persons. Similar
preparation was taking place in the Port Hadlock-Irondale area.
In 1895 the subsidiary of Union Pacific went broke, the local economy crashed, real
estate values plummeted, businesses closed down, and people left in droves.
Without a railroad investment, capital bypassed Port Townsend and went to the
growing cities on the east side of the Sound. Port Townsend's relatively isolated
position on the Olympic Peninsula, and its lack of rail facilities, were among the
primary reasons that other cities were more successful in attracting business and
industry.
Port Townsend and Jefferson County's location was again the cause of the next
major growth period, the construction and occupation of Fort Worden and Fort
Flagler. These forts were located at the east end of the Strait of Juan de Fuca to
protect the entrance to Puget Sound and the Navy Base at Bremerton. The activity
generated by these installations helped put the county back on its economic feet. But
after the end of World War I, the second major exodus from the area occurred as
troop levels at the bases dwindled, and sawmills, fisheries, and canneries failed.
In 1927 construction began on what is now the Port Townsend Paper Company's
craft paper mill. Since its beginning, the mill has been the county's largest non-
government employer, and has had a stabilizing influence on the county's economy.
During World War II the number of troops at Fort Worden again increased, and in the
late 1940s the population of the county, including Port Townsend, grew to over
10,000, its heretofore all-time high. However, in 1951 Fort Worden was closed and
all military personnel were pulled out. This resulted in the third major decline in the
business activity and population of Jefferson County. Between 1950 and 1960 the
county lost about 2,000 people, declining from 11,618 to 9,639. During the
following ten years the county gained about 1,000 people, growing to a total of
10,661 in 1970; by 1980, an additional 5,300 people lived in Jefferson County for
a total population of 15,965. The 1990 census showed a county population of
20,146, including 7,001 persons in Port Townsend. It is estimated that by 2000 the
county will be home to about 28,250 people, including 9,300 in Port Townsend, and,
that in 2005 over 31,400 people will reside in Jefferson County, 10,570 of whom will
. VOL
21 ¡.,~u 797
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3 - 22
call Port Townsend home9.
Jefferson County's location on the Olympic Peninsula, separated from the population
centers on the east side of the county by the natural barriers of Hood Canal and
Puget Sound, and without rail transportation to move raw materials and finished
products, has resulted in relatively few manufacturing plant locations in the county.
EMPLOYMENT.1O
No införmation exists on the Jefferson County labor force prior to 1966. Before that
year the State Employment Security Department considered Jefferson and Clallam
Counties to be one labor market area, and did no separate the data for the two
counties. Available data reveals that while employment increased slightly in the
1960s, it decreased in the early 1970s due primarily to the closing of the Youth
Treatment Center at Fort Worden and fewer jobs at the Port Townsend Paper Mill.
Unemployment remained a persistent problem during the 1970s, but by the late-
1 980s had subsided somewhat, and in 1 986 was on a par with the statewide level
of 8.2%. This can be attributed to the growth of service industries, the marine trades
industry, and the growing importance of tourism in Jefferson County. Summer
unemployment figures are generally lower than State percentages, however, winter
rates are higher. The average 1 990 unemployment rate for Jefferson County was
4.9%, the same as the state's rate. In 1994, the county's average unemployment
rate was 8.0%, considerably higher than the state's rate of 6.4%. (Note:
unemployment figures show the percentage of persons 16 years and older, who are
actively seeking employment and not currently employed.)
Manufacturing' The economic backbone of the Jefferson County economy is the
manufacturing sector. Though not the county's largest employment sector -- in 1993,
only 859 people out of labor force of over 8,700 were employed in this sector,
including approximately 400 at the Port Townsend Paper Mill -- the annual per
employee wage for this sector was 60% higher than the annual per employee wage
for the county as a whole: $30,000 compared to $18,500.
Government Employment. The largest employment sector in Jefferson County is
"government". In 1993 over 1,677 people were employed by one level of
government or another, 'a 9% increase from 1990. Government employment in 1993
included 228 with the federal government (a 74% increase from 1990), 176 with the
9 Watterson West Group, draft population forecast for Jefferson County, February, 1, 1995.
10 1990 and 1994 unemployment data provided by the Washington State Employment Security;
Employment by sector data, and average per employee wage: "Employment and Payrolls in
Washington State by County and Industry -- Annual Averages", labor Market & Economic Analysis
Branch, Washington State Employment Security.
lVOL
21 rAG~ 798
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3 - 23
--'-"
state government (a 28% decrease from 1990), and 1,273 with the local
government" (a 9.5% increase over 1990). On average, jobs with the government
pay relatively well in Jefferson County: $23,384 annually, per employee, in 1993.
Trade and Service~ Employment: Growth in the retail and service sectors from 1 990
to 1993 was significant. In 1993, 1,521 people were employed in the retail trade
sector, up 12.8% from the 1990 level of 1,348. In the same three year period,
employment in the service sector soared 27.5% from 1,061 to 1,353 people.
Although increases in these categories are part of a national trend, the effect may be
accelerated in Jefferson County because of the growing importance of tourism and
retirement. Average annual per employee wages are notoriously low in the retail and
service sectors. In 1993, retail sector employees each earned on average $11,192
per year while service sector employees each earned an average annual wage
$12,403.
Marine Trades: Though not a large economic force in the county, marine trades offer
a variety of employment opportunities, including boat building, sail making, boat
repair, dodgers, and marine stores.
AgricultlJral/Forestry/Fisherie~ Employment: In 1990, agriculture, forestry, and
fisheries accounted for just 2.5% of the labor force; by 1993 employment in these
sectors had dropped to 2.1 % of the county's labor force. No significant changes,
other than a gradual decline of full-time employment, are anticipated.
PO PU LA TION
Den~ity' In 1990, Jefferson County's population density was approximately eleven
persons per square mile. By 1993, the density had increased to 13 persons per
square mile. While the county's population density is low, it is adjacent to the two
most densely populated counties in the state, King and Kitsap, a short distance
acrossthe waters of Hood Canal and Puget Sound.12
Distribution: Close to 98% of the county's 1993 population lived in the eastern
portion of the county, which includes the City of Port Townsend; approximately one-
third of the county's 1993 population lived in the City of Port Townsend (7,740 of
23,500). The balance of the population (384, or just under 2.0%) lived in the West
End. The central portion of the county, within the bounds of the Olympic National
Forest, is virtually uninhabited. Main population growth is predicted to occur primarily
throughout the northern Quimper Peninsula, Discovery Bay, Port Hadlock, Irondale,
11 Local government includes employment at the city, the county, the various school districts, fire
districts, PUDs, etc.
12 "Washington State 1993 Data Book", Office of Financial Management.
~ VOL
21 'H;79~
r... . <.f.
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3 - 24
Chimacum, Marrowstone Island, Oak Bay, Mats Mats, Port Ludlow, Shine, Quilcene,
and Brinnon.13
AgA CharactAristics: In 1980, 40% of the county's residents were 45 years old or
older; 16% of the total population were over 65. By 1993, over 43% of the county's
residents were 45 or older, and more than 20% of the total population was over 65.
These figures show a marked difference from the state: In 1980, 29% of the state's
population was 45 or older; only 10% was 65 and older. By 1993, 31 % of the
state's residents were over 45, and just under 12% were 65 years and older (see
accompanying tables)14. Many newcomers are self-employed writers, artists, or
craftpersons, and their contribution to the local economy is therefore not reflected in
the employment statistics. A portion of the group is composed of "refugees" from
urban areas who have come to the county as part of the back to the land movement.
This trend is also expected to increase.
Jefferson County Population by Age Group 15
1.9.8.Q % of Total FM 'r! 1 9 9 3 % of Total
Agp. G roup POpl dation POpl Ilation POpl Ilation POpl Ilation
............................. ................................. ................................. '¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡~¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:1¡~¡¡Iø.l¡~¡¡: ..........,..................
....................'........ ......................"",..,.,..
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡~¡~¡¡¡::¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:¡:~~¡~~¡j¡Jø.í¡l¡¡~:¡ ,...,....",..".""",.."..,.. ¡::~:::t::;:¡¡¡:~:::¡¡:~:a¡;:i;¡¡¡::I¡¡¡:
¡:;¡¡:¡:¡:¡~¡¡¡¡¡:¡¡:¡¡:¡¡¡:¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡~I¡;I '.'.','.'.',','.'.',',','.'.'.','.',',','.',','.'.',',',','."'.','
""""""""","',',"',"""l~,"'j"""""""
,......."......... ., "..",
:~:~:~:~::~:{:??:{{:::': "k/:~::~~~t:
5-24 4, 2 5 9 2 6 7 5 , 1 6 8 2 2 °
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡~¡iš..¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡~Iãl.¡:¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡~¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:ii]I.¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡I¡¡il.¡¡¡¡: ,.",.".,..,.,."",........
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:ïi¡¡i¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:
45-64 3 , 7 24 23 3 5 ,47 9 2 3 3
"..,.,...."....,........... ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡~:¡¡¡::¡¡¡¡¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡i~¡ii¡I¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡:¡¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡j¡¡i~i¡¡¡¡¡!¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ .¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:¡¡:¡;¡¡tií;¡¡:: .....................,.."",
".."....",..,..,..........
,',',',',',w,',',',',',',','.'.','.'.','.'.'.','.'.'.' :¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:~¡~:::¡¡;:~:iø.~i1Im¡¡,
I:I:I:I:I:I:;$ßlfJ~~:~
TOTAL I 15,9651 100 I 23,500 I 100 I
Source: 1980 US Census, and Office of Financial Management" 1993 Data Book"
Washington State Population by Age Group
1.9.8.Q % of Total Est' r! 1 993 % of Total
Agp. G roup POpl dation POpl Jlation POpl dation POpl Ilation
¡~¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡;¡¡:~:¡:¡:¡~::¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡.¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡il~~¡til¡~¡¡ ,."...""",.,..".,.,.......,.. :¡;¡¡¡¡¡¡¡;:¡¡¡¡:llij¡¡¡~ijl;¡¡: ¡¡:::¡¡¡¡~¡:::¡¡¡¡:¡¡:¡¡¡¡:¡¡1:;¡i¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:
,'.','.'.'.','.'.',','.','.',','.',','.','.'.'.'.','.','.',','.'.'.
......""""..",...,..........
"".."""""""".,."."....
,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:}t')J':':':':':':'
................... ... ........
.....,.........,......, .......
:::::::;:::;::;;;:::::::::::::::;:::::;::::~:.:.:::::::::;::;;;
5-24 908 , 80 1 2 2 o 1 , 483 ,06 1 28 2
.........,..""."""""" .,............................... ............,....,........,...". '.'"",'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.','.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.','.', ..........,.....".,..",..,
,..,....,."..""".""",. ...................,......,....... ...................,..",.."
,....,.....",."..""""" ::::;:::::::::::::::::::;:::::::;:;:;:::::::::::::::::;:;:::::::::: ..........,.....,...,......"
.........."...."",..""" ':.:.:.:.:.:.:.:':':':.:':.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:':.:.:.:. ;~;;:~;~;1]7.45J6.5.5.::;~ ................."",.,..",
..........,...."."...."",
,..""..".,...,.""""'" ::::::r:::::::r::m:::::i1Mtrr~r :~~:~~I::~::~~:~:~ø.:3Ú~J::I~:¡:~
,""""""""""'25444."'" :tt:Wf::¡W::r:M:tam:
....,........ .......
............ .......
.............. ......
:::::;:;:::::::::;::::::::'.,:..:.:.:.,..,',...,:::::
45-64 7 73 ,043 1 8 8 99 5 , 6 8 2 1 9 o
..........,.......,.......... ¡¡¡::¡::¡:¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡4i¡1:¡¡4¡~¡i¡¡¡¡: .............."...,'..,......... ::¡::~¡::¡::¡~¡:¡:ø.iji:;:$.li::¡: ...,.......,.................
....................,........ ...,......,......,.,.".....".... ..........................,..
............................. ....,......,......,...........", .....,....,........",.,..".
....................,........ .",....."..,....,..."...."...' .....,.,......."""...,.,..
::::~;;:::~:::::~;:;~::::::tø.ij:W:f :~;~:~:~::~:~:::::::::::::::m:tmt::::r:~:~: "',"..""..,..,,,"""'"
'.".,'"",', Jf""""""""
))))){ .\ .l:':.})))
I TOTAL I 15,9651 100 I 23,500 I 100 I
Source: 1980 US Census, and Office of Financial Management" 1993 Data Book"
13 Watterson West Group, draft population forecast for Jefferson County, February 1, 1995.
14 1980 data from 1980 U.S. Census; 1993 data from "Washington State 1993 Data Book", Office
of Financial Management.
13 See Appendix G of this document for a more complete presentation.
~VOL
21 rAG~OOJ
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3 - 25
Minority Group Population: Census data show little change in the racial make-up of
the county from 1980 to 1990. Whites still account for over 95% of the county's
population, Native Americans continue to account for just under 3% of the county's
population, Asian and Pacific Islanders account for just under 1 %, and Blacks and
Other combined account for less than 1 % (see accompanying table).
Racial Make Up of Jefferson County: 1980 & 1990
Native Asi a n &
Ameri ca n Pa cific
White & AI eut I sl a nde r Black Othe r
1 980 # 1 5 , 284 440 1 04 40 97
:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:-:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:-:.:.:.:. iii¡iliiiiilillll~i¡lliiii¡: iii:¡iiiii¡¡¡ii::i¡li¡ii¡:I~illli¡liii iiiliiiiililiiiliiiliiiiilillil¡:¡¡¡: ......................... ¡¡¡iii¡¡¡¡il!:I:~:¡I¡¡¡:¡
:¡:¡::¡rill¡¡\I¡¡¡::¡:¡:¡¡ :::¡:¡ii¡:¡iq!¡¡f¡l¡iiiii
1 990 # 1 9 , 25 2 5 6 6 1 9 5 84 49
:¡:¡iil~~lliiii¡i¡i¡i¡ii¡ iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiIIJillii¡ii: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ¡:¡ii:ii¡¡ii¡:¡i:ii¡i::::li:llliiiil¡ i¡li:::i:ii:ii:i¡:I~I¡liii¡i 1¡1¡:I:::¡:I),:II:lllil:
::::::::::::::::::I::r:::w.t!~::::::
Source: US Census
Income: Per capita income for Jefferson County, in 1991 (the most recent data
available) was $17,099 (in 1991 dollars), about 13% below the state figure of
$19,52116. This disparity may be attributed to the lack of diversity in the county's
employment base, and the relatively low proportion of white-collar type jobs.
Socio-economic Indicators' All residents of Jefferson County do not share equally in
the area's economic benefits. It is difficult to correctly gauge the magnitude of
impoverishment in Jefferson County: The 1990 census data show that approximately
13% of the county's population lived at or below the poverty line in 1989 (the most
recent data available), which is only a slight increase over the 1979 rate of 12.9%17.
In 1993, the latest year data are available18, each month, on average, 1,970 persons
(8.4% of the county's total population) were served by food stamps, 1,502 persons
(6.4%) were served by medical assistance, and 1,076 persons (4.6%) were served
by AFDC. The respective average monthly percentages for the state are: food
stamps: 7.5%, medical assistance: 5.6%, and AFDC: 5.4%. (Note: These figures are
not cumlative as one person may be served by any or all of these public assistance
programs.)
16 "Washington State 1993 Data Book", Office of Financial Management.
17 Income data from the US Census lags one year; that is. the 1980 Census records 1979 income
and the 1990 Census records 1989 income.
18 "Washington State 1993 Data Book", Office of Financial Management.
rVQL
21 ,. r.~80.1
.... 1,.," .-
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 3: Jefferson County & Its Resources
3 - 26
CHAPTER 4
INVENTORY
Jefferson County contains many park and recreational assets. Approximately three-
fourths of the 1,805 square miles of land area in the county is in public ownership.
Much of this publicly owned land can be used for recreational purposes. The two
largest are Olympic National Park and Olympic National Forest. Of the 117
recreational areas found in the county, 34 are locally managed: 20 by Jefferson
County, seven by the City of Port Townsend, and seven by the Port of Port
Townsend.
Appendix B provides an inventory of park, recreation, and open space assets by
managing entities (city, county, port, state, federal, private, and special interest) as
well as a site-by-site breakdown. Appendix C is a summary of park, recreation, and
open space assets by type (camping, picnicking, etc.).
The Jefferson County Parks & Recreation Department conducts organized recreational
activities for the eastern portion of the county and provides a continually expanding
variety of activities and instruction for all ages. Programs currently provided include
baseball, basketball, soccer, volleyball, hiking, swimming, exercise, bicycling, sailing,
etc.
The following provides an inventory' of park and recreation resources in various
communities (Planning Areas)2. The Planning Area concept is a logical framework
from which the citizens of an area and the county may jointly develop plans and
action programs to meet the needs of residents in specific communities.
.
.
PI ANNING AREA 1 (City of Port Townsend)
. Fort Worden State Park with a double tennis court, boat ramps, fishing dock,
salt water beach, overnight camping, boat moorage, picnic areas, tot lot
facilities, trails, marine science center, baseball diamond, and open field.
Two tennis courts open for public use at Mountain View Elementary School.
Six tennis courts. open for public use at Port Townsend High School.
Three public tennis courts: one at Courthouse Park, two at Fort Worden.
One nine-hole public golf course at Spring Valley.
Two Port of Port Townsend public marinas at the Boat Haven and Point
.
.
.
1 No privately-owned facilities are i,:!cluded in this listing. A listing of privately-owned sites and
school facilities is included in Appendix B.
2 Planning Area Map is shown in Appendix D
~ VOL
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
21 rAG~802 Chapter 4: Inventory
4 - I
.VOL
.
Hudson and a boat launch facility at Fort Worden (State-owned).
Two major spectator sports arenas, at the Fairgrounds and Memorial Field,
both owned by Jefferson County.
A bird sanctuary and park area at Kah Tai Lagoon Park. Jefferson County
Fairgrounds.
The Port Townsend Community Center, owned by Jefferson County. A
bequest sculpture adjoining a public dock: Jackson Sculpture at City Dock.
Chetzemoka Park, Bishop Park, Cherry Park and Marine Park, each with picnic
and playground facilities. Sather Park and Rotary Park with picnic facilities.
A marine park, North Beach Park, owned by Jefferson County.
Bell Tower Park, a high bluff viewpoint park.
Northern terminus of Larry Scott Memorial Park, acquisition scheduled for
1995-96.
.
.
.
.
.
.
PLANNING AREA 2 (Cape George, Beckett Point, Four Corners. Protection Island
.
Southern terminus of Larry Scott Memorial Park, acquisition scheduled for
1995-96.
PLANNING AREA 3 (Marrowstone Island, Indian Island)
. Fort Flagler State Park with trailer, camping, and picnic facilities, public beach
adequate for swimming, and boat launch.
A state managed boat ramp and picnic shelter at Mystery Bay.
A waterfowl sanctuary range.
East Beach county park, with picnic shelter facilities.
State-owned (DNR), County-leased parks on South Indian Island.
.
.
.
.
PI ANNING AREA 4 (Port Hadlock, lrondale, ChimaclJm, Kala Point and Glen Cove)
. Anderson Lake State Park with boat launch for public fishing.
. Two county parks and one county playfield, at Chimacum Park and Irondale
Park.
Tri-Area Community Center.
Public boat launch and transient moorage at Port Hadlock, owned by the Port
of Port Townsend.
Fort Townsend State Park with overnight camping, sheltered and open picnic
facilities, saltwater beach, field sport area.
One field sports area at Fort Townsend.
H.J. Carroll Park, a regional multipurpose sports complex currently in planning
phases.
Seagull Field Park with three county-owned Little League Fields.
.
.
.
.
.
.
PLANNING AREA 5 (Discovery Bay and Gardiner)
. One public boat launch at Gardiner Beach, operated by the Port of Port
Townsend.
21 'u-80"
("'J: 'oj
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 4: Inventory
4-2
.
Gardiner Community Center.
PLANNING AREA 6 (Center, Inland Valleys)
. Public boat launch ramp at Ludlow Lake.
. Gibbs Lake Park and Beausite Lake Park, currently under design for facilities.
. Beausite Lake: Lease to Northwest Kiwanis, resident camp under design.
PLANNING AREA 7 (Port Ludlow, Mats Mats, Oak Bay)
. A county park with salt water beach, boat launch facilities, and campsites at
'Oak Bay.
Mats Mats public boat launch and public boat moorage facility, owned by the
Port of Port Townsend.
A private 18-hole golf course open for public play at Port Ludlow.
.
.
PLANNING AREA 8 (Tala Shores, Paradise Bay, Shine)
. Bywater Bay State Park with saltwater beach.
. Two public boat launch ramps at Hicks Park and Squamish Harbor (adjacent to
the Hood Canal Bridge).
PLANNING AREA 9 (Dabob, Tarboo Basin, Toandos Peninsula)
. State and federally-owned tidelands at the tip of Toandos Peninsula and Tarboo
Bay.
. Open Space Park: Broad Spit, salt water access only3.
.
PLANNING AREA 10 (Ouilcene, Bolton Peninsula, Crocker Lake, I ake Leland)
. A County park with river frontage, Ouilcene River Park.
. National Fish Hatchery on the Big Ouilcene River.
. State boat launch ramps at Lake Leland, Crocker Lake, Tarboo Lake, and Sandy
Shore Lake.
Two County parks with overnight camping facilities, at Ouilcene Park and Lake
Leland Park.
Public marina and one boat launch, picnic area, swimming beach at Ouilcene,
owned by the Port of Port Townsend.
Ouilcene Community Center is currently under planning for remodel and
expansion.
Two tennis courts at Ouilcene Community Center.
Two county-owned Little League fields at "Deema Smakman field."
.
.
.
.
PLANNING AREA 11 (Brinnon)
. Ten federal campgrounds and one observation point.
3 "Broad Spit" is a land-locked spit of tidelands in Dabob Bay that offers little or no local or county-
wide recreational benefit. The county, at some point, may choose to sell or trade Broad Spit, and use
the proceeds to serve water-access park and recreational needs elsewhere in the county.
VOL
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
21 . ç 80 AI Chapter 4: Inventory
rAG- 'i: 4 - 3
"
.
.
A state park with overnight facilities and saltwater frontage, at Seal Rock.
A state fisheries lab with saltwater frontage and boat launch ramp, at Point
Whitney.
Brinnon Senior Center.
.
PLANNING AREA 12 (West .Jefferson ColJnty)
. Sixteen federal recreation areas with picnicking, camping, fishing, and hiking.
. Two state-managed recreation sites with camping, picnicking, fishing, and
hiking.
SYSTEM ANALYSIS:
Jefferson County is a largely rural county, with only one incorporated city, Port
Townsend. Extending from Hood Canal westerly to the Pacific Ocean, the majority
of the land mass is owned by the Federal government as Olympic National Park and
National Forest. Outstanding features of the county include its diverse, lengthy
shoreline (170 miles) and the scenic Olympic Mountains. Although there is only one
incorporated city, Port Townsend, other unincorporated areas, in Port Hadlock,
Quilcene and Brinnon are rapidly growing and developing a more urban identity.
"Cluster" communities exist throughout the county, and although they are primarily
inhabited by retired -residents, many younger members of the county are moving into
them. The unincorporated areas as well as the cluster communities are generally
separated by distance, and in some cases considerable "open space", primarily in the
form of timber stands. Certain of the cluster communities, such as Port Ludlow,
which is also a private resort, have private boating and recreational facilities for their
members. Other cluster communities, such as Cape George, provide private water
access and boat launch facilities, but not a recreational facility. In general, most of
the population look to the County to provide facilities and programs. In accomplishing
this, the County provides community centers in Port Townsend, Tri-Area (Port
Hadlock, Irondale, Chimacum), Quilcene, Gardiner, and a Senior Center in Brinnon.
Recreational programming is provided through the Parks & Recreation Department4.
Due to its numerous shoreline miles, many recreational activities are water and water-
access related. However, very few miles (less than 1 %)of shoreline are publicly
owned. Large state facilities at Fort Worden, Fort Townsend and Fort Flagler provide
substantial access, and diverse activities such as hiking, beachcombing, boating and
camping. The location of Fort Worden within the city limits also provides for
auditorium needs, and cultural and artistic programs. The Port Townsend Community
Center can adequately provide for community programs as well as recreational
programs. As the population increases within the city, the needs for a more adequate
4 Jefferson County has a Parks & Recreation Department which provides programming needs,
including those needs of the City of Port Townsend. the Department of Public Works incorporates the
Parks & Recreation Department, providing services outside the City.
, VOL
21 80"'"
, " ~ '"
rtO,)" t.,~
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 4: Inventory
4-4
indoor swimming pool and additional playing fields is increasing.
In the "Tri-Area", where population is increasing at the most rapid rate, the local
community center is becoming inadequate, with few recreational programs provided
for youth. With its close proximity to Chimacum School (grades 1-12), some
recreation needs are being met by the school district. Many of the needs are not, and
consequently, the demand for a recreation facility with a swimming pool and other
programs is increasing. Although there are several playing fields within the area,
some are in poor repair, and others lack programs and restroom facilities. Although
there Is a community center in Quilcene, it does not provide recreational facilities.
Tennis courts at the facility are frequently in use by tourists, and tennis courts at
Quilcene School are in disrepair. As the Brinnon area grows, the need for a more
community-oriented center is developing. The Coyle community has established its
own Park and Recreation District, and has built a local Community Center. When
complete, the H.J. Carroll Park will address some of the recreation needs for the
Chimacum/Quilcene area by providing multi-use ballfields, multi-use trails, nature
interpretation, tennis and basketball courts, playgrounds, and maybe a pool.
Residents of other outlying areas of the county, such as Gardiner, Shine, Paradise and
Center, must frequently travel large distances to use swimming pool facilities, or to
participate in recreational programs.
Tourists place a large demand on camping, boating and hiking facilities. All areas of
the county experience a heightened population and facilities demand during the
Summer season, and this is also the time when school-aged children are frequently
unoccupied. Due to the distance between communities, as noted above, and the
presence of County and State park facilities throughout the county, the county would
be well-served by an interconnected system of trails to communities, parks and open
space. The presence of many bicyclists and pedestrians along the roadways
identifies the strong need for both safe bicycle pathways along the roads, as well as
a trail system.
~vo'-
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
21 rAc~803 Chapter 4: Inventory
4-5
, ,
CHAPTER 5
PARK AND RECREATION DEMANDS, NEEDS AND PRIORITIES
Park and Recreation demands are determined by assessing the public opinion through
surveys, public workshops and public hearings. Park and Recreation needs are
determined in a number of ways, including a set of standards, as shown in Ihe
Compr-ehem;ive Park and Recreation Plan Development Workbook'
POPULATION ANALYSIS
Growth: As discussed in Chapter 2, Jefferson County is growing rapidly. From a
1995 population of approximately 25,000, the number of Jefferson County
inhabitants is projected to increase to over 28,000 by 2000, and to more 31,000 by
20052.
This increase in population can be attributed to three major factors: (1) the continued
immigration of retirees, (2) the immigration of people seeking refuge from more
densely populated urban centers, and (3) an influx of residents associated with
economic growth and development in Jefferson County and adjacent counties.
Apart from increases to the resident population of Jefferson County, substantial
increases in vacation homes, tourism, and other out-of county visitors has been noted
since 1970. The Port Townsend Chamber of Commerce reports that close to 59,000
visitors sign-in at the Port Townsend office each year3.
Settlement Patterns: In terms of location, population growth is expected to generally
follow existing patterns of development. Based upon a detailed analysis of
development trends, it is evident that growth will continue to concentrate near the
shorelines or waterfront or water view property. The areas which will most likely
experience an accelerated rate of growth will be: Irondale, Port Hadlock, Chimacum,
Marrowstone Island, Port Ludlow, Oak Bay, Mats Mats Bay, Shine-Termination Point,
Squamish Harbor, Port Townsend, Cape George and the Quimper Peninsula, Quilcene,
and Brinnon. .
1 Prepared by the Interagency Committee For Outdoor Recreation, April 1990
2 Watterson West Group, draft population forecast for Jefferson County, February 1, 1995.
3 Per the Chamber of Commerce, visitors signing in per year: 1985: 47.263; 1987: 63,232; 1989:
62,801; 1990: 59,575; 1991: 58,635; 1992: 60,949; 1993: 56,981; 1994: 59,385.
~VOl
21 r,~t = 807
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 5: Demands, Needs and Priorities
5 - 1
REGIONAL RECREATIONAL DEMAND
It is evident that the demand of Jefferson County park and recreational facilities will
come from MANY sectors4: (1) county residents, (2)tourists en route to other
recreational areas, including the Olympic National Park and National Forest, Clallam
County recreational facilities, Vancouver Island and other scenic areas in Canada, (3)
recreational enthusiasts including hikers, sportsmen, bicyclists, campers,
beachcombers who come to visit the many state parks, especially Fort Worden, Fort
Flagler, and the many county parks, and to travel the miles of scenic highways.
The needs of the majority of recreationalists can be met by local government. The
regional or out~of-county demand for park, recreation, and open space facilities can
create serious financial demand on the County and special taxing districts which are
primarily intended to serve the needs of local residents. It is anticipated that normal
regional park demand in Jefferson County will be dramatically accelerated as a result
of the projected population increase, concomitant residential and industrial
development, and the continuously accelerating tourist influx, throughout the Olympic
Peninsula. These increased needs will necessitate assistance from state and federal
park and recreation agencies and the private sector.
poet IC OPINION SURVEY
In November and December of 1 989 a county-wide park and recreation survey5 was
circulated to Jefferson County residents selected at random with equal numbers
selected from each commissioner district. The survey was done in cooperation with
the County, City, and Port. The survey contained sections relating to activities,
preference and support of facilities and recreational offerings (existing and proposed),
use of existing facilities and support of specific projects. Each question provided a
comment section, and the survey also included an intensive demographic section.
Community Activities: The first question of the survey presented many activities.
Respondents were asked to indicate the activities they or family members participated
in during the past year. The following is a list of the twenty most frequent activities,
and percentage of participation:
4 "The most popular in-state vacation destination area was the western Puget Sound/Olympic
Peninsula region which was visited by 27.9% of all 1986 vacationers." 1991 PIIgAt Sound Water
Quality Plan.
S RAcreation¡:¡1 Opportunities in .Jefferson County ¡:¡nd Port Townsend' A 1989 Survey of Citi7An
Needs and Opinions. Survey created by Jefferson County, Port of Port Townsend, and City of Port
Townsend, and compiled by the Social & Economic Sciences Research Center of Washington State
University.
VOL
21 r~Gç803
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 5: Demands, Needs and Priorities
5-2
ACTIVITY % PARTICIPATION
1.Walking ...............................................81.60
2.Television..............................................71.80
.3.BeachCombing......................................... 69.70
4.Picnicking..............................................58.50
5.Boating ............................................... 54.00
6.Hiking ................................................ 51.90
.7.Movies............................................... 49.40
8.SaltwaterFishing ........................................47.50
9.MusicConcerts ..........................................43.40
10.Swii'nming ............................................43.20
11. Birdwatching ..........................................41.40
12.Bicycling .............................................36.40
13.Theater ..............................................35.20
14.Spectator .............................................32.60
15.ChurchActivities........................................32.00
16.Crafts ...............................................30.90
17.Dancing ..............................................29.70
18.FreshwaterFishing ......................................28.40
19.Playground ............................................24.60
20.lnstructionalClasses .....................................20.60
The second question of the survey dealt with existing and possible facilities and
activities. Respondents were asked to comment on the importance (from not
important to very important) of a list of items that covered both facilities and
recreational offerings. The ten "VERY IMPORTANT items were:
ACTIVITY % ANSWERING
1.Trailsforhikingandwalking ................................53.80
2.CommunityPark .........................................49.10
3.More recreational activities for youth. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 46.20
4.lndoorswimmingpool .....................................43.50
5.Road access and public boat launch to saltwater beaches. ............ 41.20
6.Multi-purposerecreationalfacility ............................34.70
7. Playground areas ........................................32.60
8. More recreational activities for seniors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 31.40
9.Trailsforbicycling ....................................... 30.20
10. Road access and public boat launch to freshwater beaches. . . . . . . . .. 29.80
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS WERE MADE IN RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE:
1.Need Tri-Area multipurpose facility.
2.Need more youth activities.
3.Skateboarders need a place.
4.More parks like Chetzemoka Park and Oak Bay Park.
5.More attention to boat ramps.
6.More "natural" areas.
7.Railroad right of way as a trail.
8.Better restrooms.
¡VOL'
21 'H-80"
r,.",' 'J
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 5: Demands, Needs and Priorities
5-3
9.More open space.
1 O.More child oriented parks.
RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED TO SHOW WHETHER THEY WOULD PROVIDE
CERTAIN KINDS OF PARK AND RECREATIONAL SUPPORT:
ACTIVITY
Definitely No:
I. Provide space for activities ..................................59.50
2.Dona~elandforpublicuse ..................................73.30
3.Provideequipment........................................46.40
% ANSWERING
Definitely Yes:
No listings showed any definitely yes above 12%.
Probably yes were:
I.Providefinancialsupport ...................................
2.Volunteer my time for recreational support. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
53.60
43.30
RECREATIONAL OFFERINGS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY WERE
LISTED, AND RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED WHETHER THE OFFERING WAS NOT,
SLIGHTLY, MODERATELY OR VERY IMPORTANT.
ACTIVITY
Very Important:
1. Swimming Pool Programs ...................................43.2
2.0rganizedYouthSports .....................................41.4
3.SummerYouthPrograms ....................................40.6
% ANSWERING
Not Important:
1. Adult Sports Leagues ......................................42.1
2.0penGymActivities .......................................33.3
It should be noted that in the "Comments" section for Question 8, "How, if at all, do
you think that existing recreation offerings might be improved?", most responses
centered around more publicity, better maintenance, more usage of school facilities,
better transportation for youth, better playground equipment, addressing the
skateboard issues, more varied programs (non-sport)for youth, trail systems and a
multi purpose facility outside the city limits and swimming pool issues. For Question
9, "Do you have any other comments about your interests in recreation in your local
area of Jefferson County?" responses were quite varied, with many concerned with
trails, skateboarding, pool, and saltwater access.
IN THE NEXT SERIES OF QUESTIONS, WE ASKED ABOUT SPECIFIC PROJECTS,
UNDER SPECIFIC PROJECTS, THE FOllOWING WERE GIVEN THE HIGHEST
RA TINGS:
.VOL
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
21 r^G~ 81J:hapter 5: Demands, Needs and Priorities
5-4
ACTIVITY % ANSWERING
Increase Greenbelts .........................................73.3
Create Pocket Parks .........................................78.3
High Bluff Viewpoints................................... .....74.9
The next section of the survey concerned itself with demographics. We then, as our
final page, asked for general comments. The general comments, were, of course,
varied. Many people offered concerns about drug usage, helping those less fortunate,
the economic environment of the county, requests for more senior programs,
concerns about clear cuffing and logging practices, desire for large parcels of public
property, access to fresh and salt waters, additional youth and adult recreational
activities.
DEMANDS BY PLANNING AREA
PLANNING AREA 1 (City of Port Townsend)
This section will be completed by the City of Port Townsend in their separate
comprehensive plan.
PLANNING AREA 2 (Cape George, Beckett Point and Four Corners)
1. Salt water access, including a boat launch on the east side of Discovery Bay.
2. A trail system including hiking, horseback riding and bicycling to connect with
trails to other sections of the county.
A community or system of pocket parks, with playgrounds, ballfields and picnic
areas.
3.
PLANNING AREA 3 (Marrowstone Island, Indian Island)
1 . Development of the shoulders of Flagler Road (main arterial across
Marrowstone Island) to accommodate pedestrian, equestrian and bicycle
traffic, OR, develop an integrated trail system along a less heavily traveled
road.
Provide an indoor swimming pool in the vicinity of Port Hadlock, Irondale or
Chimacum.
2.
PLANNING AREA 4 (Port Hadlock, Irondale, ChimaclJm, Kala Point and Glen Cove)
1. Provide an indoor swimming pool facility.
2. A recreation facility to serve more of the needs of youth and adults.
3. More boat launch facilities.
4. An integrated trail system, including hiking, equestrian - and bicycling.
5. Acquisition of the mouth of Chimacum Creek area
6. More picnic and children's playground facilities.
7. More developed and undeveloped park space.
PLANNING AREA 5 (Discovery Bay and Gardiner)
1. Swimming pool facility.
(VOL
21 f,~V 81J
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 5: Demands, Needs and Priorities
5 - 5
2.
3.
4.
Outdoor tennis courts.
Open space and wildlife habitat acquisition.
Integrated trail system.
PLANNING AREA 6 {Center: Inland Valleys
1. More supervised sports programs for youth.
2. Recreational facility.
PLANNING AREA 7 (Port Ludlow, Mats Mats, Oak Bay)
1. "Public Golf Course6.
2. Bicycle and hiking trails.
3. Better transportation to parks and events.
4. Indoor and outdoor tennis courts.
PLANNING AREA 8 (Tala Shores, Paradise Bay, Shine)
1 . More communication regarding existing activities and events.
PLANNING AREA 9 (Dabob, Tarboo Drainage Basin, Toandos Peninsula)
1. More undeveloped open space.
2. Local recreation facility.
3. Additional boat launch facilities.
PLANNING AREA 10 (Ouilcene, Bolton Peninsula, Crocker Lake, Lake Leland)
1. Integrated trail system.
2. Undeveloped open space.
3. More salt water parks.
4. Overnight horse facilities.
5. Bicycle pathways along roads.
6. Swimming pool facility.
7. Better playground equipment.
8. More recreational activities for youth and adults.
9. Improvement of Little League facility.
10. Improvement of Lake Leland fishing dock7.
PLANNING AREA 11 (Brinnon)
1 . More boat launch facilities.
2. Community Park.
3. Better bicycle pathways along roads.
4. More teen activities.
6 ed. note: a private golf course open for public play exists at Port Ludlow.
7 ed. note: the fishing dock at Lake Leland is the property of the Washington State Department of
Wildlife, and is under the management of Jefferson County.
VOL
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
21 rAG" 812 Chapter 5: Demands, Needs and Priorities
5-6
PLANNING AREA 12 (West Jefferson County)
No preferences were shown in the responses from this area.
PUBLIC WORKSHOPS AND MEETINGS COMMENTS
Complete text of the public workshops and hearings is attached as Appendix E.
Comments from the workshops and hearings has been incorporated in the Demands
by Planning Area section of this chapter.
NEED
Typically, needs for park and recreation services are based on models and standards
of the industry, usually for large cities or urban settings. The LA.C. also provides
local recreation standards8. Jefferson County being a lightly populated rural county
with approximately three-fourths of its land area in public ownership, large areas of
undeveloped private lands, and miles of shorelines, does not fit well into standard
statistical models. Standard models are further distorted in Jefferson County due to
the heavy use of county recreational facilities by non-residents (primarily seasonal
tourists) .
In comparing the state model standards from the lAC with the current Jefferson
County facilities, we find:
Neighborhood Playground:
Standard: No standards available.
Comment: The County has designated playgrounds at Quilcene, Oak Bay
Park, Irondale Park, and the Port Townsend Community Center. Due to the
rural nature of the majority of the county, the term "neighborhood" takes on
a different quality. Neighborhoods are often seen as geographic areas, such
as Port Hadlock or Quilcene. As one of the demands shown in the survey is
for community parks, and playground equipment, the concept of neighborhood
may be changing, and the demand may be met by the "pocket park" concept.
Baseball Diamonds:
NRPA Standard9: 1 field per 5,000.
Average Standard1O: 1 per 4,500.
Comment: Two of the county's regulation-size baseball diamonds
are located
8 Needs were taken from the Local Agency Standards of Counties (Population 18,000 to 70,000),
Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation, February, 1987"
9 NRPA: National Recreation & Park Association.
10 Average Standard: Six-county average, representing six of the 15 counties in Washington State
with population ranging from 18,000 to 70,000 residents.
LVOL
21 r,~(,81'~
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 5: Demands, Needs and Priorities
5-7
in the City of Port Townsend, at Memorial Field and at Port Townsend High
School. In addition, the county has three regulation-size fields outside of Port
Townsend: one in at Chimacum High School, one at Quilcene School, and one
at Seagull Park in Hadlock. These two fields come close to filling the city's
need (city population is approximately 8,200 in 1995). There are eight other
baseball diamonds of Little League size, three at the Jefferson County
Fairgrounds, in Port Townsend, three at Port Hadlock's Seagull Field, and two
at the Quilcene Little League facility.
Softball Diamonds:
NAPA Standard: 1 field per 5,000.
Average Standard: 1 field per 3,000
Comment: Currently, there is one regulation-size softball field in the City of
Port Townsend, at Memorial Field. Beginning in the Fall of 1995, a second
regulation-size softball field will be available for public use at the newly
constructed Blue Heron Middle School. There are three county-owned Little
League size fields located at the Fairgrounds, inside the Port Townsend city
limits) two Little League size fields at the Quilcene Little League facility, three
Little League fields at Port Hadlock's Seagull Field, and one Little League field
at Irondale Park.
Soccer Fields:
NAPA Standard: 1 field per 10,000
Average Standard: 1 field per 1,500
Comment: Currently the county has six soccer fields: One in Memorial Field,
two run by the Port Townsend School District, one at Chimacum School, and
one in Quilcene.
Soccer is a big recreation activity in Jefferson County and in dire need of
added playing space. Soccer fields are all multi-purpose and compete with
football and other sport activities for field space. Soccer is practiced and
played in Little League fields, vacant lots, and school play grounds that are
often unsuited for competition.
Basketball Court: .
NAPA Standard: 1 court per 5,000.
Average Standard: 1 court per 500
Comment: Twelve indoor and 18 outdoor public basketball courts are
dispersed throughout east Jefferson County. The County owns four of these
30 courts: one indoor court at the Port Townsend Recreation Center, one
outdoor court at the County Courthouse, and two outdoor courts at Irondale
Park. The remaining 26 courts are located as follows: Indoor courts: five
courts at the Port Townsend schools; four at the Chimacum schools; one in
Quilcene; and one in Brinnon. Outdoor courts: eight at the Port Townsend
~VOL
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
21 r~c~814 Chapter 5: Demands, Needs and Priorities
5 - 8
schools; four in Chimacum; two in Quilcene; and one in Brinnon.
Outdoor basketball courts are a great amenity to community and neighborhood
parks; development should be encouraged in this area.
Neighborhood Parks:
NRPA Standard: No standard available.
Average Standard: 1 facility per 6,000.
Comment: Facilities which could qualify as neighborhood parks are located at
~he Port Townsend Community Center, Irondale, Chimacum, Oak Bay,
Quilcene, East Beach, Hicks and Quilcene River Parks. However, these parks
are used frequently by tourists as well as local people, some of whom drive
considerable distance to use boat launch facilities, etc. For example, in the
geographic compilation of facility usage, many residents of Cape George
(which has no community park in its vicinity) listed Chetzemoka Park (inside
Port Townsend) as their second most frequently used facility; with their first
most frequently used facility the Port Townsend Boat Haven; their third was
the Fairgrounds. This may lead us to assume that we are not providing a
necessary recreational element, i.e. a community or neighborhood park. The
value of the geographic information will lead us to be able to predict which
areas require priority for community or neighborhood parks.
Recreation Centers:
NRPA Standard: No standard available.
Average Standard: 1 facility per 25,000.
Comment: Jefferson County maintains community centers at Port Townsend,
Quilcene, Gardiner, Tri-Area; and a senior center at Brinnon. The Coyle
Community Center is maintained by Recreation District #1 (Coyle). The county
and city provide the recreational planning for Port Townsend, and most
recreational activities for youth take place within the city limits. However, the
Jefferson County Parks & Recreation Department helps provide a variety of
recreational activities throughout the county, in particular in the Quilcene, Tri-
Area, Gardiner and Brinnon areas. In addition, the Hadlock Teen Center in
maintained and operated by the non-profit Coyote Foundation.
Auditorium: .
NRPA Standard: No standard available.
Comment: An auditorium that the county has participated in funding is
currently under construction at Fort Worden State Park.
Major Park:
NRPA Standard: 5 - 10 acres per 1,000
Average Standard: 6.7 acres per 1,000
Comments: The county maintains fourteen (14) parks distributed throughout
lVOl
21 ¡N~81.~:
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 5: Demands, Needs and Priorities
5-9
the county, five greater than 10 acres in size 11, and nine with fewer than 10
acres. The close proximity of the Olympic National Park, and Olympic National
Forest is of major benefit.
Regional or County Parks:
NAPA Standard: 5 - 10 acres per 1,000.
Average Standard: 6.7 acres per 1,000.
Comment: The county maintains fourteen (14) parks distributed throughout
.the county, five greater than 10 acres in size, and nine with fewer than 10
acres.
Environmental Areas:
NAPA Standard: No standard available.
Comment: One center operates out of Fort Worden State Park: the Marine
Science Center.
Swimming Pool (indoor):
NAPA Standard: No standard available.
Average Standard: 1 facility per 10,000
Comment: One facility, located in the City of Port Townsend, and owned by
the School District. The City of Port Townsend Recreation Department leases
the facility from the School District and operates it. There is one. pool, shared
by both lap swimmers, instructional classes, and leisure swimmers.
Swimming Pool (outdoor):
NAPA Standard: 1 facility per 20,000.
Average Standard: 1 facility per 25,000.
Comment: No public facility available.
Tennis Courts:
NAPA Standard: 1 facility per 2000.
Average Standard: 1 facility per 1,830.
Comment: The County currently maintains one tennis court in the City of Port
Townsend, and two tennis courts in Quilcene. Fort Worden State Park has
two tennis courts. Six tennis courts are maintained by the Port Townsend
School District: four at Port Townsend High School, and two at Mountain View
Elementary School. Four additional courts are available to the public at the
Chimacum Schools.
11 The five largest county parks are: Gibbs lake Park (348 acres), Beausite lake Park (53 acres),
H.J. Carroll Park (40 acres), County Fairgrounds (32 acres), and Oak Bay Park (31 acres).
~VOL
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
21 '#;81'1 Chapter 5: Demands, Needs and Priorities
rd.. L 5 - 10
Boat Facilities:
NRPA Standard: No standard available.
Average Standard: 4 acres per 1,000.
Comment: Although no standards are given by the NRPA or the LA.C. in their
Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan Development Workbook, the facility
need is included because boating is the fifth highest recreation activity (54%
participation) as shown in the 1989 survey.
Needs Summary:
In Jefferson County, park and recreational "demands" and "needs" can best be
gauged by (a) an analysis of in-County population growth and settlement patterns,
(b) greater than local recreational demand, (c) public opinion surveys and local
workshop meetings, and (d) comparison with the State standards.
In analyzing the needs, we find deficiencies in particular in the smaller, localized
parks, such as play lots, basketball courts, neighborhood playgrounds, and
neighborhood parks. This need is also reflected in the survey response towards
'community parks', in which 49% of the respondents stated that community parks
were "Very Important".
Both baseball and softball diamonds are lacking, in terms of need, as are soccer
fields, and trails. Most of the fields are Little League, not regulation, in size.
Cooperative use of the School District facilities needs to be pursued, as well as a
study to determine where fields should be incorporated, or current fields increased
In size.
Auditorium and major park needs are well met in the County, with the State facility
at Fort Worden supplying auditorium space, and with the Olympic National Park and
National Forest supplying major park facilities.
The need for an additional swimming pool in the County has been shown through the
demand expressed in the survey, as well a public workshops. The location of the
only public pool in the County is in the City of Port Townsend, and is inconvenient
to potential users south of the City.
PRIORITIES
Several methods were used to prioritize facility acquisition, development and
programs within the planning process. First, public input (via opinion survey, public
workshops and citizen advisory board meetings) established the dialogue for potential
projects. The public also focuses attention on those projects or concepts that were
of highest priority to them, as indicated in the survey, and also by keeping discussion
of particular projects alive.
tVOl
21 rv,817
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 5: Demands, Needs and Priorities
5 - 11
Another step in prioritizing projects is the analysis of how any expressed demands or
needs conform to the mission, strategy and policies of this document. Finally, the
projects are scheduled for implementation and a budget is established. An important
factor in designating projects is the future maintenance cost of any facility or
program. This last step is actually the product of public input guided by the policies
established by the Parks Advisory Board. The Parks Advisory Board in recommending
projects, and the Board of County Commissioners in analyzing projects for funding
purposes, should consult the following criteria:
0
.Does the project/program reflect local demands and needs? This may be done
by local community surveys and by input of community review boards.
0
Does the project/program conform to the. local community plan (if any),
County Comprehensive Plan, and to the Goal, Strategies, Policies and
Procedures section of the Parks Comprehensive Plan?
0
Does the project/program reflect the policies and goals of the Washington State
Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Program (SCaRP)
0
Have maintenance costs been projected?
0
Does the project/program allow for future expansion as the population or
demand increases?
0
Does the project/program serve the current local use estimates?
0
Does the project/program promote conservation of natural resources?
0
Does the project/program reflect a reasonable distribution of projects
throughout the County?
0
Does the project/program promote cooperation between local governments?
0
Does the acquisition project provide future recreation benefit?
0
Can the project/program partially support itself through program fees?
RECOMMENDA TION
It is recommended that a land acquisition rating system be developed consistent with
the goals and objectives of other county planning documents as amended, such as
the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, the Jefferson County Subdivision
Ordinance, the Jefferson County Zoning Code, the Shoreline Management Program,
the Jefferson County Interim Critical Areas Ordinance, the various resource lands
ordinances, etc.
VOL
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
21 rAG: 818 Chapter 5: Demands, Needs and Priorities
5 - 12
GOAL
CHAPTER 6
GOAL, STRATEGIES, POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
The gqal of the Parks Comprehensive Plan, acting through Jefferson County and the
Parks Advisory Board, and in cooperation with the Port of Port Townsend, and the
City of Port Townsend, is:
To develop and maintain park and recreation facilities that are responsive to the needs
and interests of Jefferson County residents.
STRATEGY
!VOL
1.
To develop a budget for park and recreation facilities which recommends
realistic funding for acquisition, maintenance and operation within an equitable
framework of taxation and which reflects prudent fiscal management.
2.
To actively seek public involvement through advisory boards, workshops, and
news releases.
3.
To continually pursue cooperative efforts, joint project development, and long
range planning with other governmental agencies.
POLICIES
1.
To use and preserve the many natural features of Jefferson County which are
available for park and recreation activities.
2.
Park and recreation facilities should accommodate a diversity of age, interest
and ability groups.
3.
The location, type and amount of park and recreation facilities should be
consistent with the needs and desires of citizens in the area.
4.
Park design and operation should deal with the impact such activities have, not
only within park boundaries, but on adjacent properties and communities as
well.
5.
Park and recreation facilities should be located, designed, and constructed to
be compatible with natural features such as soils, geology, topography, and
21 ¡,~r~8.1.~
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 6: Goals, Strategies, Policies and Procedures
6 - I
14.
15.
shorelines resources.
6.
Private enterprise should be encouraged to provide park and recreation
services. Publicly financed and operated facilities should not be considered as
the only method to meeting recreational demands.
7.
Public park authorities should establish population limits for each overnight
park and should charge fees commensurate with commercial park fees for the
combined purposes of providing means for payment of services and to
eliminate the abuse that often comes from "free" services.
8.
Recreation facilities should make adequate provisions for (a) traffic, both inside
and outside the facility, (b) proper water, sewage and garbage disposal
methods, (c) law enforcement, (d) vehicular parking, and (e) prevention of
"activity overflow" onto adjacent properties.
9.
Recreation facilities should make adequate provisions such as screening, buffer
strips, fences, and signs, to prevent park overflow and to protect the value and
enjoyment of adjacent or nearby private or public properties.
10.
Use of recreation facilities should emphasize preservation and conservation and
create an awareness that abuses such as tree cuffing, unauthorized taking of
marine life, driftwood and similar souvenirs, and destruction of public property
diminishes the beauty and the future use of the parks, recreation and open
spaces.
11 .
Signs associated with recreation facilities should be kept to a minimum in
number and size, and should be erected as informational or direction aids only.
12,
Adequate provisions should be made for the control of fires both within
recreation facilities and between recreation facilities and adjacent private or
public lands. The provisions should be in conformance with local fire district
requirements.
13.
Unless specifically designed for that purpose, park and recreation facilities
should prohibit the use of off-road vehicles in order to protect natural features
as well as the enjoyment and value of the facility and adjacent properties.
Cooperative use of publicly owned lands for recreational purposes should
continue as a method to broaden recreational opportunities and should keep
development costs down.
Acquisition and development of park, recreational and open space land and
facilities should anticipate future need. The Capital Improvement Program in
VOL
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
21 fAG~82JChapter 6: Goals, Strategies, Policies and Procedures
6-2
16.
17.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
. VOL
this plan should be continually pursued and updated.
Parks and recreation facilities along marine shores, lakes and streams should
be compatible with the goals, policies, and performance standards of the
Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program.
The tidal marshes of Jefferson County have been analyzed for their value as
contributors to fish and shellfish production. They also serve as wildlife
habitat, recreational resources, and erosion-defense works. Therefore,
development rights, title, or conservation easements should be purchased for
the County's tidal marshes on a priority basis.
County tax revenues should be spent for park and recreation facilities which
serve, or provide a direct economic benefit to the residents of Jefferson
County. Use of recreational facilities by visitors to the County is encouraged,
as this generates a revenue for park and recreational maintenance and
operation.
Developers of new residential subdivision should provide land, facilities. or
fees-in-lieu of, for neighborhood parks and recreation.
Park and recreation facilities which clearly serve distinct community or
neighborhood interests should be financed by local improvement districts.
To maintain park and recreation facilities to the highest possible standard.
The Parks Advisory Board will work with the Planning Commission, Planning
Department, Public Works Department, Board of County Commissioners, and
other county departments in formulating procedures in carrying out the goals
of the Parks Comprehensive ~, Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, and
Jefferson County.
PROCEDURES
In order to insure consistent County policy regarding this plan and other p\ans as
developed by the County, and to promote communication with other County
departments, other boards and commissions, and with the public, the following
procedures should be instituted:
Property Acquisition' Requests for property acquisition shall be submitted to the
Parks Advisory Board (P.A.B.) in written form, and may also be presented to the
P.A.B. in person, for review and comment. The P.A.B. will respond to the request
within sixty (60) days, and inform the Board of County Commissioners of the request,
and of the date the review will be completed. During the interim, the P.A.B. may
21 r:.u82i
. Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 6: Goals, Strategies, Policies and Procedures
6-3
request additional information from the petitioner, and require that the petitioner
appear in person to discuss the acquisition. The P.A.B. will respond to all requests
in writing, and all responses will be transmitted, to, the Boar??f C~unty
Commissioners. Property determined to meet the criteria for acquIsition will be
prioritized by the P.A.B. for inclusion in the ~ext year's budget, or f~r. ~merg~ncy
acquisition, and an action plan and explanation of the need for acquIsItion will be
made a part of the yearly update of this plan, and will follow the amendment
procedures as shown in Chapter 2: Planning Process. All final decisions for
acqui~ition will be made by the Board of County Commissioners.
Conserv::Jtion ERsements: Requests for conservation easements should follow the
same procedures as for property acquisition. In addition, Conservation Easements will
be referred to the Planning Department for review, and distributed to appropriate
agencies.
LeRse of County Property: Any request for lease of County property should be
reviewed by the Parks Advisory Board for recommendation to the County
Commissioners.
Sale/Exchange of County Property: The Parks Advisory Board will annually review
any property to be auctioned by the County for tax foreclosure. Property will be
reviewed to determine the need to retain for open space, trail or community park
purposes, or for exchange for other properties designated necessary for open space,
trail or community park purposes. The P .A. B. will review any request for exchange
of properties with any entity or person requesting such exchange, and respond to the
County Commissioners with a recommendation within thirty (30) days.
Road VacRtions: The Parks Advisory Board will review all county road vacation
requests within the time requested by the Jefferson County Planning Commission.
Development Review' The Parks Advisory Board will review all developments as to
the requirement for open space, potential for trail corridors, and the consistency with
the Comprehensive Trails Plan. and consistency with the Parks Comprehensive Plan.
It should perform its review within the time requested by the Jefferson County
Planning Commission, .and the P.A.B. will review any changes proposed after initial
review, and after final review, determine that all new facilities, such as pocket parks,
trails, greenbelts, etc., have been successfully performed by the developer, and have
been inventoried.
Comprehensive Plan Review' The Parks Advisory Board will review elements of any
proposed amendment to or rewriting of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan.
The plan will be reviewed for its consistency with the Jefferson County PRrks
Comprehensive Plan, and the Comprehensive TrRil Plan.
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
21 rAc:822 Chapter 6: Goals, Strategies, Policies and Procedures
6-4
VOL
CHAPTER 7
TRAilS
Trail systems are of special interest to the citizens of Jefferson County, as indicated
in the survey, in the formation of the Peninsula Trails Coalition, and as discussed in
public workshops.
At present, provision for a public trail system in Jefferson County is inadequate, while
the necessity for a trail system is increasing. The only such systems currently in use
in the county (with few exceptions) exist mostly as a result of public and individual
property owners' permissive attitudes allowing passage across their land. These
systems could be eliminated because of the lack of public stewardship. The present
rate of population influx, and accompanying development, and the increasing visitor
impact in the county dictate that steps be taken soon to insure that opportunities for
trail use do not disappear. There are a number of different types of trail users which
can be identified at present. These include: hikers, all-terrain bicyclists, joggers,
horseback riders, all-terrain (motorized) vehicle enthusiasts and the handicapped.
It is the view of the Jefferson County Parks Advisory Board that such a complex and
vital issue deserves extensive planning. Therefore, the Board recommends that an
ad hoc committee be formed to create a county-wide trails plan for inclusion in the'
Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. The committee should be composed of
representatives of the various trail user groups mentioned above, representatives of
Federal, State and Local governments, and interested citizens appointed by the Board
of County Commissioners. It would be the mandate of this committee to provide
means of implementation of general trail policies and to provide trail standards and
design policies for the Comprehensive Trails Plan.
TRAIL POliCIES
1. Trails should be related to population centers. They should be in proximity to
the demand, and should represent local interest in terms of location and trail
uses.
2.
Trails should be related to recreation resources. They should connect parks,
playgrounds, open space, items of cultural interest, and other recreation
resources.
3.
Trails should be related to urban activities. Trails perform a transportation
function and should connect and serve schools, shopping areas, entertainment
and recreation facilities, and churches, as well as provide access to places of
work.
tyoC
21 L~(: 82~;
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 7: Trails
7 - 1
4.
7.
8.
9.
12.
Trails should traverse areas of natural beauty or special interest. Natural areas
such as stream banks or greenbelts should be followed where feasible. Points
of historic interest, scenic views, or other scenic attractions should be
scheduled for trail routes when possible.
5.
Trails should utilize existing rights-of-way wherever possible, Le. roads,
railroads, powerlines, waterlines, etc.
6.
,The Jefferson County Off-Road-Vehicle Plan will address the needs of off-road
enthusiasts.
County trails should be coordinated with those of other public and private trail
systems.
Recreational trails should be planned to interconnect or form loops of
reasonable length. No such trail should dead-end unless unique circumstances
exist. The user should, wherever feasible, have the opportunity to return to
the point of beginning by a different route.
Trail systems should be coordinated with the vehicular and pedestrian systems
of the neighborhoods through which they pass.
10.
Pedestrian or hiking use should be considered a legitimate use of horse or bike
trails unless intensity of use dictates separation of uses.
11.
Standards should be developed for design, construction and maintenance of
the trail system.
Consideration of safety of users should be considered in the design and
construction of trails.
VOL
2 .. 82 Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
1 rAG;: ~ Chapter 7: Trails
7-2
, .'
CHAPTER 8
OPEN SPACE
A general definition of Open Space is found under Chapter 84 of the Revised Code
of Washington:
'( 1) "Open space land" means (a) any land area so designated by an official
comprehensive land use plan adopted by any city or county and zoned
accordingly or (b) any land area, the preservation ot which in its present use
would (i) conserve and enhance natural or scenic resources, or (ij) protect
streams or water supply, (iij) promote conservation of soils, wetlands, beaches
or tidal marshes, or (iv) enhance the value to the public or abutting or
neighboring parks, forests, wildlife preserves nature reservations or sanctuaries
or other open space, or (v) enhance recreation opportunities, or (vii) preserve
historic sites, or (vii) retain in its natural state tracts of land not less than five
acres situated in an urban area and open to public use on such conditions as may
be reasonable required by the legislative body granting the open space
classification.
The need for protection and acquisition of open space was expressed in the 1 989
survey, in which 57% of the respondents stated they wanted undeveloped public and,
private lands such as beaches, open fields, meadows, farmlands, woodlands, and;
other natural areas increased. Fifty percent wanted to see established, developed
recreational areas such as parks, campgrounds, trails, bike paths, etc. increased.
Currently, Jefferson County does not have an Open Space Tax Program with a Public
Benefit Rating System. The County recognizes three categories of open space: (1)
Open Space "Open Space", (2) Open Space Timber, and (3) Open Space Agricultural.
Currently in the County there are no requirements or criteria for lands to be converted
to open space "open space".
RECOMMENDA TION:
The Parks Advisory Board recognizes the public benefit of open space, and
recommends that when opportunities for the acquisition of open space arise they
should be pursued. Funds, when they become available, should be applied toward
acquiring lands as listed below.
LAND ACQUISITION RATING SYSTEM FOR OPEN SPACE
Lands to be considered for acquisition for Open Space should contain the resources
shown below:
0
0
Rural Open Space Close to Urban Growth Areas or Rural Centers
Urban or Growth Area Open Space
..VOl
21 ¡~C; 823
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 8: Open Space
8 - 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Surface Water Quality Buffer Areas
Archaeological Sites
Historical Sites
Anadromous Fish"Rearing Habitat--Ponds and Streams Terrestrial Ecosystems
Aquatic Ecosystems
Significant Wildlife Habitat Areas
Natural Shoreline Environments
Scenic Vistas or Viewpoints
.Programmatic Recreational Benefit Lands
Specific Recreation Benefit Lands
Public Lands Buffers
Special Animal Sites
Special Plants Sites
Natural Drainage Areas
Priorities and ratings should be consistent with the goals and objectives of other
planning documents.
VQ!-
21 'roar,. '.0 82().o Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
t<, Chapter 8: Open Space
8-2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.VOL
. .
CHAPTER 9
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
It is apparent that there are several major categories of outdoor recreational demands
and needs throughout Jefferson County:
An integrated system of horse and bicycle trails.
Improved public salt water access and boat launch at strategic locations.
Neighborhood or day-use parks.
Overnight camping facilities.
Enhanced recreational programs.
Open Space preservation.
Historical/cultural preservation.
RECOMMENDA TIONS'
1. Development of a Jefferson County Comprehensive Trails Plan. Also, the
County should continue its program of developing and marking bicycle routes
and should pursue a program of obtaining trail easements for walking, bicycling
and horseback riding. (a) Road improvement projects along right-of-ways
designated as bicycle trails should include shoulder paving for use as bicycle'
lanes. (b) All bicycle routes should be clearly marked with the official Jefferson'
County bicycle lane symbol. (c) Convenient-to-use maps depicting Jefferson
County bicycle routes should be distributed at strategic locations. (d) Road
signs explaining the Jefferson County bicycle route markers should be erected
at strategic locations throughout the County to serve both as an information
guide to bicyclists and a warning to motorists. (e) Trail easements for horse
trails should be acquired where these trails cross private property. Trail
easements should be retained when vacating road right-of-ways designated as
equestrian trails.
2.
Jefferson County should institute a program for the acquisition and
development of marine waterfront properties, and work cooperatively with the
Port of Port Townsend in developing boat launch facilities and waterfront trail
and interpretive systems. An inventory of county roads leading to water and
their potential use should be considered.
3.
The development of existing and future park sites should be oriented toward
day-use activities to serve local residents. These sites should include large and
small ("pocket") parks, provide picnic, playfield and playground facilities.
4.
Recreational areas that serve multi-regional needs (that is, needs beyond those
21 fM} 827
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 9: Findings & Recommendations
9 - 1
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
of the county's residents) should be developed by private, state, and federal
entities in partnership with the county.
Facilities that serve multi-agency users, as boat launches, should be developed
by joint cooperation between Jefferson County, the Port of Port Townsend and
state and federal agencies.
Organized recreation programs should be continually expanded throughout
Jefferson County, with focus on those areas south of the City of Port
"Townsend.
Areas that have been identified to have historical significance should be
preserved by local, state or federal agencies. When appropriate, interpretive
centers should be developed.
Preservation of undeveloped open space should be made by acquisition of
property by local agencies or land trusts, or trades with private or
governmental landowners, and incentives for developers.
Education about preservation and conservation through public forums and
through school districts should be encouraged.
10.
When special projects are proposed for a planning district, special issue
surveys of the district should be undertaken to determine district support. .
VOL
21 fM/828
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 9: Findings & Recommendations
9-2
CHAPTER 10
ACTION PROGRAMS
Input from the survey, public workshops, community planning groups, and public
meetings indicated that the major demands of the citizens of Jefferson County were:
II.
. Acq u i s iti 0 n /Prese rv ati 0 n / Con se rv ati 0 n
A. Saltwater Access
B. Trails
C. Open Space/Parks
1. View Points/High Bluff Viewpoints
2. Community Parks/Pocket Parks
3. Conservation Easements
Development of Facilities
A. New Facilities
B. Upgrade of Existing Facilities
Studies/Plans
Recreation Programming
III.
IV.
Strategies to address these major needs for 1995-2000 should be addressed as
follows:
I ACQUISITION/PRESERV A TION/CONSERV A TION
In the years of 1995-2000, the County has identified as a priority the acquisition of
parks and open space properties. Specific properties to be acquired will be identified
based on the goals and objectives of this plan. Current acquisition projects include:
A. Saltwater:
.L
Oak Bay Waterfront Parcel' The Oak Bay Park is broken into an upper
park portion and a lower park portion by a tidal estuary. The acquisition
of the additional land adjacent to the lower park (shoreline) will provide
more recreational opportunity by increasing the shoreland and tidal
estuary area substantially. The acquisition of the additional property
adjacent to the upper portion will increase the camping and picnic areas
substantially.
B. Trails:
In 1991, the county began a Master Plan/inventory of existing and potential
trails, in an effort to create a Comprehensive Trails Plan. This plan has not
l YOL: .
21 'u-82')
-' r..,,' I.JI
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 10: Action Programs
10 - 1
been completed; completion of the trails master plan should be a priority during
1995-1996. In 1994 the County implemented an agreement with the
Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation (lAC) to begin acquisition of
trail properties to complete the Larry Scott Memorial Park, a possible link in
the chain of individual sections of trail that make up the "Olympic-Discovery"
trail to Clallam County. During the years 1994 - 1998, the County will be
completing this trail system, as well as trail systems in other parts of the
county. The Parks & Recreation Department (a branch of the Public Works
Department) will work closely with the road design section to create safe
. conditions for bicycle pathways along county roads. In order to complete a
comprehensive trails plan and to coordinate with the Olympic-Discovery trail,
an additional staff member will be required. A portion of the cost of an
additional person will be borne by in-kind matches from the monies available
for the Larry Scott Memorial Park trail from the lAC; the remaining amount will
come from an ISTEA matching grant and the County current expense fund.
Monies for the acquisition of properties for the Larry Scott Memorial Park will
be matched 50% by lAC and 50% by an ISTEA Enhancement grant, with
additional funds provided by Jefferson County. Trails in other parts of the
county may be accomplished by private donation, abandoned county road
rights-of-way, development donation, and acquisition by the County.
C. Open Space/Parks:
Citizens are encouraged to make recommendations for acquisition to the Parks'
Advisory Board. The Parks Advisory Board will provide a forum to determine
the priority for acquisition of property by the County. Through the Planning
Department and its Water Quality Division, wetlands should be identified to be
acquired through funding by the Washington State Department of Ecology.
Some wetlands acquisitions may be accomplished through funding from the
Washington State Department of Ecology. Areas identified for acquisition will
be prioritized by the Parks Advisory Board, with continuing citizen input in the
form of workshops, working with the Jefferson County Planning Commission,
Shoreline Commission and the Board of County Commissioners. Some areas
that are identified as a priority may be acquired through private donation,
through purchase or exchange of properties by the county1, or, when property
is developed, by development reservation and exchange of property with the
developer. The recent formation of the Jefferson County Land Trust will also
provide an opportunity for acquisition of public trust land.
The county owns many individual lots located both in platted property, and as
acreage. Development of these lots into local, neighborhood parks is an
tin 1990. the County. DNR, and a private timber harvesting company entered into an exchange of
trust lands to preserve the Gibbs Lake/Beausite Lake property.
VOL
21 rA['~ 83~ Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
- Chapter 10: Action Programs
10 - 2
inexpensive project, particularly if neighborhoods can assist in the maintenance
of such areas. Community parks were second in importance (after hiking trails)
in terms of community needs.
Special consideration should be given to preservation of open space that
protects natural drainage areas. In many areas, open space can successfully
be combined with trail corridors. Whenever possible, connecting corridors and
areas of open space should be preserved to provide contiguous wildlife and
vegetation habitat areas. Identification of crucial wildlife habitat, wetlands,
'greenbelts, water access areas and buffer zones will continue to be a goal.
Community Parks ¡Pocket Parks' The county will develop funds for community
adopt-a-park programs and work with local citizen groups to help provide
funding for these programs.
Chimacum Creek Conservation Easements' Preservation of Chimacum Creek,
has been identified as an essential need for many years. The County, and
conservation groups such as the Chimacum Watershed Council, recommend
actively pursuing conservation easements to protect the quality of water in
Chimacum Creek. The creek has an active Salmon run, and is a major drainage
for the mid-Quimper Peninsula.
II DEVElOPMENT OF FACn ITIES
The County will pursue the development of new facilities, as well as the upgrade of
existing facilities. Proposed facility development for 1996-2000:
A. New:
Chima cum - H J. Carroll Park: This park will provide a regional multipurpose
sports complex with tournament-level sports fields, passive recreation, and
interpretative center and trails.
B. Upgrade:
Little League Facilities' Jefferson County Little League Association has
provided the county with a list of needs, and wants to work closely with the
county in implementing, safety items, as well as upgrading fields, bleachers,
facilities and equipment. Maintenance of the fields has been, and will continue
to be the responsibility of the Little League Association.
Memorial Field Upgrade' The County will upgrade the current playing field
surface, and add a irrigation system.
~VOL
21 uc,;83.1.
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 10: Action Programs
10 - 3
2.
As the population of Jefferson County continues to increase, there will be
further need to develop active recreation areas. Planning areas that may
currently be sparsely populated will change with expanded development.
Areas that have traditionally been retirement neighborhoods may attract
younger adults with children. The Jefferson County Parks & Recreation
Department will concern itself with locating and acquiring properties in county
planning areas that will serve as neighborhood recreation parks. These parks
may include, but are not limited to, playgrounds with equipment for younger
children, basketball courts, tennis courts, baseball fields, soccer fields, and
. restrooms. The County Parks Advisory Board will assign a committee to locate
potential recreation sites in each planning area. Local citizen advisory groups
will assist the Board in the planning, design, and function of each neighborhood
recreation area.
III STUDIES / PLANS
In order to pursue various projects, studies and plans are needed:
1.
Recreation Center/Swimming Pool: A need for a swimming pool location
outside of the city limits was noted particularly in the Port Hadlock, Chimacum,
Irondale and south-county areas. Funding for the facility will be explored, with
the possibility of lAC funding a portion of the project. Other funding sources
could be Commission Bonds; parks and recreation districting; partnerships with
non-profit organizations and/or school districts; or a loan from the Farmers
Home Administration. In 1991 , the county began a preliminary study for
siting the facility south of Port Townsend, and in 1994 the county dedicated
a 40 acre county-owned gravel pit located in Chimacum to be used as the site
of the future H.J. Carroll Park. The master plan for Carroll Park includes, in
addition to a swimming pool, multi-use trails, playgrounds, multi-use ballfields,
bathrooms, and maintenance facilities. A planning consultant has developed
a preliminary design of the project, including schematics and phasing. The H.J.
Carroll Advisory Board is currently looking into acquiring funding. Site
preparation will begin in winter 1995-96; construction of buildings and facilities
will depend upon funding availability. The maintenance of such a facility will
create a need for additional staff and equipment. Fees for use of the facility
would generate a portion of the revenue necessary to run the facility. Fees
obtained from the Chimacum School District and Ouilcene School District for
use of the facility would also offset maintenance costs. The increased
maintenance would also create a need for additional personnel in the Parks &
Recreation Department. This person could also provide coordination for
additional recreation activities in the area, which is a need also indicated in the
survey.
Gibbs lake: The Gibbs Lake and Beausite Lake areas were acquired by the
VOL
2 Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
1 rM,:832 Chapter 10: Action Programs
10 - 4
County in 1990. A draft master plan has been developed by the County Parks
Advisory Board. This plan has not been completed; completion of the Gibbs
Lake Master Plan should be a priority during 1995-1996.
3.
Comprehensive Trail Plan: The County will develop a trails plan in order to link
communities, parks and recreation areas, and a citizen board will be formed to
provide preliminary review for the Parks Advisory Board.
4.
.Skateboard Facility: In 1994, the City of Port Townsend sponsored a
temporary skateboarding area in the parking lot across from Memorial Field, in
Port Townsend. In 1990, the Jefferson County Parks and Recreation Advisory
Committee expressed its interest in developing an area for legal and safe
skateboarding. The Parks Advisory Board will continue to work with the City
of Port Townsend, local merchants, citizen groups, and youth to develop such
an area. The Parks Advisory Board will work in cooperation with Hadlock Teen
Center (i.e., Coyote Foundation) and with citizens in the county to establish
priorities and needs for skateboarders.
IV. RECREATION PROGRAMMING
This need was especially emphasized in the more rural areas of Jefferson County.
Currently programs in soccer, basketball, T -ball, swimming, tennis, and track are
offered, and effort will be made to expand program offerings that will correspond with
the needs of local youth. This will be accomplished by studying the needs as '
described in the survey for the various planning areas of the county. The Parks
Advisory Board will be formed to study community recreation needs and make
recommendations. Community centers will be encouraged to provide or create new
space for organized youth programs and recreation personnel will work out of satellite
centers for localized sports programming.
Some recreation programs need to occur at specialized sites, e.g., Port Townsend
Swimming Pool, or Memorial Field; therefore, efforts will be made to coordinate with
public transportation for access to and from events.
Networking with school districts, Little Leagues, nonprofit youth sports associations,
and private enterprises will provide a more comprehensive overview of youth sports
offerings in each area, and create partnership and cooperation among providers. This
will enhance the quality and quantity of recreation programming.
Recreation offerings may go unnoticed, so every effort will be made to adequately
advertise and educate local residents of organized youth sports programs.
Organizational networking, newsletters, school bulletins, local newspapers,
community center information boards, and recreation personnel will continue to
inform the public as to recreational sports offerin!~s.
.VOL
»1 83-" Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
~ r,~C; d Chapter 10: Action Programs
10 - 5
Summer youth programs were indicated in the survey as a priority need for local
residents. Coordinating public transportation with events and facilities, networking
with other providers, using local community centers and their recreation/volunteer
staff, and effective education about and publicity for programs are means of
achieving better programming. Current offerings include tennis lessons, swimming
lessons and programs, day camps, soccer day camp, track club, creative arts
programs, basketball day camp, open gym, sailing programs sponsored by the
Wooden Boat Foundation, and Port Townsend Youth Center activities. A number of
these programs are offered only in Port Townsend and many county youth are unable
to participate. Summer recreation aids will be hired in the Tri-Area and
Ouilcene/Brinnon area to expand available youth programs. Recreation personnel,
extra hire, and volunteers will explore expanded creative arts programming.
VOL
21 rM/834
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 10: Action Programs
10 - 6
CHAPTER 11
CAPIT At IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The following six-year capital improvement program is intended to describe areas and
facilities proposed for acquisition and/or development, estimates of capital costs,
anticipated funding sources, and an identification of capital improvement priorities.
The c'apital improvement program will be annually updated to reflect changes in
priorities and funding sources. The Board of County Commissioners, in their regular
annual budgetary cycle, must approve each request for funding on an individual basis.
Each request to the Board of County Commissioners for funding will be accompanied
by a report detailing the estimated annual maintenance costs associated with the
facility. Costs shown for specific projects are estimates only.
The current 1993 County-owned parks (plus Park and Recreation District No.1 Coyle
Community Center site) inventory includes 543.7 acres of parks and 1.0 miles of
trails. The table below shows the current parks inventory:
ACRES OF COUNTY-OWNED PARK LAND
Total
422.8
30.9
5.5
43.81
40....1.
543.7
Regional Parks
Community Parks
Neighborhood Parks
Open Space
Campgrounds
Capital Facilities Projects and Financing: 1996 - 2001
Memorial Field
Priority improvements include (dates projects planned are in parenthesis):
0 installation of an irrigation system for the turf (1997);
0 expansion and improvements to the maintenance building for storage of
equipment, fuel, and paints (1996);
rewiring field lighting system for night games (1997);
expansion of lighting to cover baseball field (1 999); and
0
0
I This 43.8 acres of open space is "Broad Spit", a land-locked spit of tidelands in Dabob Bay
that offers little or no local or county-wide recreational benefit. The county, at some point, may
choose to sell or trade Broad Spit, and use the proceeds to selrve water-access park and recreational
needs elsewhere in the county.
,VOL
21 ¡~r,;835
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 11: Capital Improvement Program
11 - 1
a
expansion of concession stand (1997).
Gibbs Lake Park
In accordance with the current draft Gibbs Lake Master Plan, capital improvements
will include:
a relocating caretaker's home and improving septic and electrical systems to new
caretaker's area (1 998-1999);
improvements to public beach area, including better access for swimmers
(1 996-1 997);
. creation of picnic and shelter area (1 996-1 997);
expansion of small boat launching area (1 996-1 997);
improvements to integrated park trail system with a trail to Beausite Lake area
and surrounding natural areas (1 996).
a
a
a
a
Irondale Park
This beautiful neighborhood park will be improved with the addition of:
a a covered picnic shelter (1997-1998);
a areas for maintenance storage and bathrooms (1997-1998);
a a pole light to illuminate the basketball court and parking areas (1996).
Lake Leland
Improvements to Lake Leland will include:
a the creation of a new well to serve as a potable water source for campground
uses (1997);
extending electricity to park for entrance lighting, water pump and electrical
hookups for park users (1 999);
waterfront improvements for public access to lake for fishing (1 997).
a
a
Ouilcene Park & Campground
In relationship to the improvement to the Quilcene Community Center, which is
adjacent to the campground, much effort will be applied to:
a development of a community picnic and park area (1 998); and
a development of 27 recreational vehicle and camping sites (1999-2000).
Planned improvements to Quilcene Park include:
a a playground area, and grassy and landscaped areas for passive use (1998);
and,
bringing in water, septic, and electricity for development of bathroom and
shower facilities for campground users (1 998).
0
Chimacum Park & Campground
Chimacum campground is located across Highway 1 9 from the proposed regional
recreational H.J. Carroll Park.
a Trail access to H.J. Carroll Park will be developed with pedestrian access
\~OL
83'ô
21 r~t~ 0
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 11: Capital Improvement Program
11 - 2
0
across Highway 1 9 with WSDOT approval (1 998).
Chimacum campground will be renovated with new toilet facilities hooking-up
to existing septic system and park electrical systems (2000).
A maximum of 10 camping sites will be expanded into the park (2000).
0
Oak Bay Campground
New vault toilets will be installed in upper and lower oak bay parks (1998).
Parks and Recreation: Trails
Capital Projects LOS Capacity Analysis2
Current
County-wide Miles @ 0.00050 Miles Net Reserve or
Time Period Population per capita Available Deficiency
1993 Actual 23,500 12.0 1 -11.0
1 994 Transition 957 0.5 0 -0.5
1995-2000: Growth 4,910 2.5 0 -2.5
CFP Projects and Financing Plan
Sources and Uses of Funds
(All amounts are times $1,000)
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Existing Revenue: 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Total
User Fees 26 27 28 29.1 30.2 31.3 171.6
lAC 300 0 300 0 0 0 600
0 0
2 Source: "Capital Facilities (1996-2001): Goals and P()licies, Capital Improvements and
Implementation Programs; Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan; Third Review Draft, March 28,
1995." Henderson, Young & Company.
. VOL
21 83Þ"" 1
. ¡r- ; .
-' r",,;' ~
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 11: Capital Improvement Program
11 - 3
USES OF FUNDS
Capacity Projects: 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Total
1 . Larry Scott Park Trail Land
Acquisition & Development 0 0
(6.0 miles) 0 0 0 0 0
2. Various Trail Park Land
Acquisition
(8.0 miles) 0 0 0 240 240 0 480
SubTotal 0 0 0 240 240 0 480
Non-Capacity Projects
Regional Park Development &
Improvements
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
Total
1. H.J. Carroll Park
(Activity Fields, Interpretive
Center, Restroom, Parking with
Lighting, Maint Shop)
2. Memorial Field
(Expand Concession Stands,
Retail Stadium Lighting,
Irrigation System, Fencing)
600
0
600
0
3923.3
0
5132.3
12
20
0
30
0
0
62
3. Gibbs Lake Park
(Relocate and Replace
Caretaker Housing)
SubTotal I
.'
,
5
6171
10
30 I
25
6251
20
,
50 I 3923.3 I 0 I 5254.3 I
0
60
Neighborhood Park
Developme nt/l m prove m ants
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
Total
4. Irondale park (Toilets/Septic
System/Picnic Shelter/Courts
Lighting/Parking
SubTotal
.
20
20 I
0
01
.
o 'îo
0
01
80
80 I
30
130
130 I
Parks Campground
Developm enM mprov e m e nts: 1996 1996 1998 1999 2000 2001 Total
5. Lake Leland
(Water System, Electricity,
Fishing, Dock Improvements) 0 20 0 30 0 0 50
6. Quilcene
(New RV Units) 0 0 50 50 50 0 150
.VOL
21 TAL; 833
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 11: Capital Improvement Program
11 - 4
.'
7. Chimacum
(Toilets, Septic System,
Electrical Hook-ups) 0 0 50 0 50 0 100
8. Oak Bay
(Toilets for Upper Oak Bay
Park) 0 0 50 0 0 0 60
SubTotal 0 20 150 80 100 0 360
Operating Impact of level of Service Capital Improvements
(All Amounts are Times $1 ,000)
Capacity Projects
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Total $
Larry Scott Trail 0.0 0.0 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 22.3
Additional trail land
acquisition 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sub Total 0.0 0.0 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 22.3
Non-Capacity Projects
Regional Parks: 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Total $
H.J. Carroll Park 0.0 40.0 60.0 60.0 85.8 85.8 331.6
Memorial Field 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Gibbs Lake Park 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sub Total 0.0 40.0 60.0 60.0 85.8 85.8 331.6
Neighborhood Parks 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Total $
Irondale Park 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 4.4
Sub Total 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 4.4
21 ¡.~[; 833
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 11: Capital Improveme:nt Program
11 - 5
. VOL
Park Campgrounda 1997 1999 1999 2000 2001 2002 Total.
Lake Leland Park 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Quilcene Park 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Chimacum Park 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Oak Bay Park 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Bayshore Motel 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sub Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
. .
VOL
. 4n Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
21 rAG" 8 d Chapter 11: Capital Improvement Program
11 - 6
CHAPTER 12
OPTIONS FOR PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
Anyone or combination of various means could be employed to implement this plan.
Following is a summary of the most commonly used methods.
Volunteers: Local corporations and service organizations and groups concerned with
conservation, recreation activities and land use as well as interested individual citizens
can and do assist in the development of park or recreation facilities. Fund-raising
drives, contribution of materials, and weekend labor can assist greatly in park or trail
development and save county residents many tax dollars.
land Trusts: A land trust is a non-profit, tax-exempt organization whose main
objective is to acquire land, or rights to land (in perpetuity) for future conservation or
recreation purposes. All land is held in trust for the public benefit. A local trust has
no powers of taxation, but acquires assets by gift, purchase or conservation
easement.
County Community Grants: The County will budget on a yearly basis monies to be
designated for small "community grants". These funds may 'be applied for by
communities or groups for local facility or program improvements or development, ~
acquisition of property for community parks or greenbelts or local trail systems. Fifty
percent (50%) of the project cost must be borne by the local community.
Philanthropy or Gifts: Individuals may, at no cost to the County and with County
acceptance, transfer land, or development rights to land, to the County, a park
district, or a non-profit land trust. Such transfers are normally deductions from
income tax, and result in lowering or eliminating property taxes.
Easements and Purchase of Development Rights: The County may acquire open
space easements or development rights (except by condemnation or eminent domain)
under a number of options:
1.
The private owner may retain the right to continue any existing open space use
of the land, and to develop any other open space use, but under the terms of
such a purchase the County may forbid or restrict building thereon or may
require that improvements cannot be made without County permission.
2.
The land may be sold and used by the new owner, subject to the terms of the
agreement made by the County with the ori!~inal owner.
. VOL
?1 "H-8'"
,.,., r ,. ;' If.!..
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 12: Options for Plan Implementation
12 - 1
3.
The County may acquire the fee title to such property for the purpose of
conveying or leasing the property back to its original owner or other person
under such covenants or contractual arrangements as will limit the future use
of property in accordance with R.C.W. 84.34.
Park Districts can acquire park or recreation land by the same type of purchases.
GRANTS
Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation (I A C )
Local park, recreation, and open space projects may be funded in part through LA.C.
These funds come from a number of sources: statewide voter-approved bonds; fuel
taxes from fuel used by watercraft; monies from the national land and water
conservation fund.
The LA.C. annually reviews local acquisition or development projects and grant
applications for funds. If a community receives LA.C. funds, at least 50% of project
costs must be borne by the local community. Priority categories for receiving funds ,'.
are as follows:
1.
2.
3.
Public Access to Shorelines.
Special or Extraordinary Opportunities for Use by the Handicapped.
Use, Enjoyment and Preservation of a Natural Setting. No single local project
will be funded which is not a part of the County Parks, Recreation, and Open
Space Plan, or Parks Comprehensive Plan 1.
Aquatic lands Enhancement Account (A.l E A )
The Department of Natural Resources (D.N.R.), through A.L.E.A., provides funding
for public access to the water, and recreation and interpretive projects. Historically,
A.L.E.A. funds required a minimum of 25% match from local government. These
funds could only be used for water dependent access and recreation projects, and
had to be associated with navigable water. The A.L.E.A. fund was established by the
1984 Legislature. These monies come from revenue received the D.N.R. from leases
of state-owned aquatic lands. However, this program is not currently funding local
projects.
1 Which may be identified in the Natural HAritagA Plan and/or the Washington WAtlanns Priority
elan..
VOL
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
21 rM/842 Chapter 12: Options for Plan Implementation
12 - 2
Non-Highway Road/Off-Road Vehicle Activities Funds (NOVA)
In 1972, the Legislature set aside one percent of the gasoline fuel excise tax to
represent a part of the tax paid on fuel used in motorized recreation off of gasoline
tax supported roadways. The following types of projects are eligible:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Land Acquisitions.
Development/Redevelopment of facilities.
Plans, Studies, Surveys.
"Management Programs, Including Maintenance and Operation Costs.
Safety, Education and Enforcement.
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (lSTEA) Enhancement
Program: funds available on a state-wide competitive basis for trails, scenic
overlooks, and historic or cultural preservation projects related to
transportation.
FUNDING SOURCES
Funding Recommendation: Substitute House Bill No. 6639 provides for acquisition
of conservation areas through the approval of the 1% Real Estate Excise Tax.
Jefferson County should consider adopting funding alternatives to generate the funds
necessary for open space preservation, conservation, and park and recreation~'\t
programming. Estimates of revenue that would be generated by instituting this ta~"-:
would be approximately $1.2 million/year.',
A Conservation Futures Fund may be generated under the Washington Open Space
Tax Act, R.C.W. 84.34. This act grants the County the authority to levy a maximum
of 6.25 cents per thousand dollars of assessed valuation, on a county-wide basis.
Approximately $75,000 per year would be generated if this tax was levied.
General County Funds: The Board of County Commissioners, through its annual Park
Department budget, can appropriate funds for County-wide park system development,
operation, and maintenance. This is the current method used by Jefferson County
for park and recreation purposes. An advisory park and recreation board can also be
created.
Park and Recreation Service Areas: Pursuant to R.C.W. 36.68, the Board of County
Commissioners, or a group of local voters, can create special park and recreation
service areas. Such service areas can levy special taxes for specific purposes (such
as the construction of a new community swimming pool), but are not authorized to
levy a general, annual tax. The Board of County Commissioners supervises the
activities and operations of the special servi<:e area. New, special-district
commissioners are not elected as is the case with park districts.
fvoë
?Jl :1f':-$:1A':,
.~,..t .. I..;i'::t',:
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 12: Options for Plan Implementation
12 - 3
Local service areas are intended to promote the theory that those who benefit from
development should bear the costs, and those who gain no benefit need not
participate financially. Currently there are no established local service areas in
Jefferson County; however, if such service areas were to be formed, they should
follow established planning area boundaries.
PArk Dim-ricts: Park districts are special taxing entities such as school, port, or water
districts. They are authorized by R.C.W.s 38.69 and 53, the Washington Recreation
District Act, and are formed by a vote of the people within a given geographical area.
These'districts are managed by a board of elected commissioners. Property taxes are
collected based upon a tax rate per thousand dollars of assessed valuation. That
portion of a land owner's property tax is then earmarked for public park and
recreation development within the boundaries of the district. Like local service areas,
park districts are an attempt to insure that park-related taxes collected from a given
area are also spent in that local community. Jefferson County has one district, Park
and Recreation District No.1 located on the Coyle peninsula. This district was
established in 1984.
. .
VOL
21 f'~U 844
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 12: Options for Plan Implementation
12 - 4
."
CHAPTER 13
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
The success of any plan, program or project depends upon its public acceptance.
The Parks Comprehensive Plan reflects the values and wishes of Jefferson County
citize~s through the following methods of public involvement:
County-wide park and recreation survey' The county, in cooperation with the City
of Port Townsend and the Port of Port Townsend, conducted a county-wide survey
in November and December of 1989. Residents were selected at random from the
voter registration rolls, and were distributed in equal numbers in each county
commissioner district'. The survey asked specific questions related to activities,
preference and support of facilities and recreational offerings (existing and proposed),
use of existing facilities and support of specific projects. Each question contained a
comments section. Although the survey was not identifiable by specific respondent, ,
it was identifiable by specific geographic area, enabling the County to assess
demands and concerns by planning area. The survey received a 48% return rate, :,"., .,'
with a 95% confidence level. The comments section allowed respondents to express";~, :,;:,:'
concern, criticism and praise, or merely comment in a general way, about current'"~ ",t'.',
practices, proposed or desired projects and facilities. : '\>
The survey has proven to be an invaluable tool in discussion and tracking of demands
during the public workshop sessions held prior to adoption of the plan. The extent
of the survey remarks showed that citizens were indeed concerned with park and
recreation offerings, were willing to ~upport various activities and facilities, and that
specific conceptual ideas, such as open space, "pocket parks" and greenbelts were
very important. Planning Districts, as would be expected, had their own individual
concerns, related to specific areas, such as the mouth of Chimacum Creek in the Port
Hadlock, Irondale, Chimacum district, and the Gardiner Boat launch in the Gardiner
district. Not to be overlooked is the basic information provided in the question which
allows the respondent to state which activities he or she participate in most
frequently.
The achievements of this survey are that now the County, City and Port have a good
idea of what activities citizens most frequently engage in; what activities and
improvements they are willing to support with public funds; what their priorities for
the funding are; what specific concerns they have; and the general demographics of
1 ed note: A summarized discussion of the survey is contained in Chapter 5: Park and Recreation
Demand and Needs, and a complete reading of the survey results and comments is available from the
Jefferson County Department of Public Works.
.VOL
21 w¡;843
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 13: Public Involvement
13 - 1
the county. Of primary importance is the use of the survey as a forum, where, in an
anonymous situation, people are allowed to express themselves. Stories were carried
in the Port Townsend Leader about the survey and its relationship to the Earks
Comprehensive Plan.
Special Committee: The plan was developed by the Jefferson County Parks Advisory
Board. Their function and responsibility is described in Chapter 2: The Planning
Process. The board meets monthly; meetings are listed in the "Your Right to Know"
column in the local weekly newspaper, the Port Townsend Leader. The meeting are
open to the public, and are frequently attended by interested citizens. Meetings are
recorded and meeting minutes are published. During the process of the development
of the plan, the board met every other week from November, 1 989 through April 1,
1990. In November and March, the board hosted two special three hour workshops
with the county commissioners, representatives from the Jefferson County Planning
Commission, Planning Department staff, representatives from the City of Port
Townsend Parks Advisory Board, City of Port Townsend staff, Port of Port Townsend
Staff, press reporters from the Port Townsend Leader, representative from Centrum,
the Director of the Jefferson County Public Works Department, Public Works staff .
and Jefferson County Recreation staff. The workshops were designed to bring
together the various decision and policy making branches of local government, to
exchange ideas regarding parks capital improvements, parks and activities demands,
to demonstrate local citizen concern, to present updates on the development of the
plan, and to develop communication within the system. The November, 1989, .
meeting was introductory in type, stating the goals of the board in regard to the Parks' .
Comprehensive Plan, and discussion of various proposed capital improvement plans.
The March, 1990, meeting focused on a presentation of the survey results (and the
impact these demands have on the Parks Comprehen~ive Plan) and a discussion on
the complete capital improvement plan.
E..ublic Wnrkshop~' Five public workshops were held during the period of public
involvement for development of the 1990 Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive
Plan. The public was notified of the workshops in the Port Townsend Leader, and the
Penin~lJla Daily New~. Both papers also carried stories about the plan and the need
for public involvement prior to the workshops. Workshops2 were held in Port Ludlow
(Planning Districts 7, B), Quilcene (Planning Districts 9,10,11), Tri-Area (Planning
Districts 3,4,6), Gardiner (Planning District 5), and Port Townsend (Planning Districts
1,2). The Jefferson County Planning Commission held a workshop hearing/plan
review on May 23, 1990, and a final hearing on May 30, 1990.
Public Hearings' Public hearings regarding the original 1990 plan were held by the
Jefferson County Planning Commission May 23, 1990, and May 30, 1990. The
notes of those meetings are attached as Appendix E. The Board of County
2 See Appendix E for a summary of each workshop.
VOL
21 rAc.843
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 13: Public Involvement
13 - 2
, .
Commissioners held a public hearing for adoption of the plan on June 25,1990.
The 1995 Five-Year Update of the 1990 Parks Comprehensive Plan: In 1990, the
Washington State Legislature adopted the Growth Management Act (GMA). One of
the primary goals of the GMA is to encourage the involvement of citizens in the
planning process. Beginning in 1993, the Board of County Commissioners
encouraged the formation of citizen-based community planning groups as a part of
their commitment to the GMA-directed grass-roots planning. These community
planning groups were charged with producing community plans including goals and
policies that reflect the character of their area. By 1994, 12 groups, representing the
communities of Brinnon, Discovery Bay, Lake Leland, Marrowstone Island, North Port
Ludlow, Paradise Bay, Port Ludlow, Quilcene, Quimper, Shine, Tri-Area, and the West
End, had begun work on community plans (the communities of Coyle and Gardiner
had completed community plans in the early 1990s, and did not feel it was necessary
to update them at this time.) The community groups, ranging from 10 to 20
members, met one, two, and sometimes four times a month for up 18 to 24 months3.
Many of the resulting community plans address the issues of parks, recreation and
open space, with a community focus.
In March, 1995, the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board appointed a sub-committee
to update and revise the 1990 Parks Comprehensive Plan. This group met with public
works and planning staff and reviewed the proposed level-of-service standards and
capital facilities plan for consistency with current county policies and plans; and
reviewed the newly drafted GMA-directed community plans to verify and validate the'
values and goals of the 1990 Parks Plan. To obtain additional input on parks and
recreation issues, and to verify the community values expressed in the 1 989 Parks
& Recreation Demand and Needs Survey, county staff will distribute a Survey Results
Update in the form of a condensed survey, using the community planning groups a
as a forum for distribution. Results of this Survey Update will be available through
the Jefferson County Parks & Recreation Department.
1995 Environmental Review: In May, 1995, environment review on the revised plan
was completed; a Determination of Non-Significance was issued June 1, 1995.
Public Hearings: On June 7, 1995, the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board held an
advertised public meeting to solicit public input on the revised Jefferson County Parks
Comprehensive Plan. Following their public meeting, the Advisory Board forwarded
their recommendation for adoption to the Board of County Commissioners. On June
19, 1995, the Board adopted by Resolution No. 50-95 the 1995 Jefferson County
Parks Comprehensive Plan.
J Note: The community-defined planning areas described here are not the same as the "planning
areas" referenced and utilized elsewhere in this plan; the two :sets, however, are close.
VOL
2.1 fH,:847
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 13: Public Involvement
13 - 3
Appendix A: Map of Jeff.raon County, Wa.hlngton
i
\
I
I,
~
\
,
\
(
>
\
~J
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Appendix A: Map
a-I
VOL
21 rAf).84S
<
c:::>
1-:
~
f-.ìo
,.
.."'"
"
GO
~
~.~:J
Appendix B: Invento., ot lIarkS & l1eCreallon ~lles
- Front FAAt
Fresh Salt Historical or Picnic
. Acres Water Water Cultural Campsites Units Fees MisceØaneous
Courthouse Park 1.11 __n - Historical - - - tennis. basketb8ll. open field
Recreation Center 0.92 -- - Historical - - - community activity gym, meeting rooms
$6.00
Fairgrounds 22.70 --- - - 70 10 $3.00 power, water, horse track, showers. exhibit st8Is
Memorial Field 4.09 u- -- - - - - stadium, field sports
North Beach Park 0.61 -..- 310 - - 3 - cookhouse. beech
East Beach Park 0.61 ..0. 100 - - 2 - cookhouse. beech
S. Indian Island 0.71 --- 11,340 - - 8 - beach. d8mming
Oak Bay Parks 31.17 n-- -- - 68 6 Yes camping. beach. d8mming
Irondale Park 1.90 --- - - - - - baseball diamond. field sports. play 8M
Hadlock Park 2.50 ..-- - - - - -- field sports. play 8M
Chimacum Park 7.95 n_- - - 18 8 Yes water. cookhouse. community center
Squamish Harbor Board Launch 0.67 --- 460 - .-- 2 -- boat ramp. bNch
Lake Leland 2.60 250 - - 22 4 Yes boat launch. fishing
E. Quilcene Park 1.00 ---- 175 - - 1 -- beach. tW~tching
Quilcene Park 4.07 300 --- -- 8 2 Yes cookhouse, play area, water, community ceIUf
Quilcene River Park 0.26 --- -- - - 1 -- fishing
Larry Scott Memorial Park PROPOSED
H.J. Carroll Park PROPOSED
35th St Park PROPOSED
Gibbs Lake Park 348.0 Fresh 4 boat launch and fishing
Beausite Lake 30.0 Fresh N W Kiwanis c.mp
Quilcene Sports Park 13.34 -- basebell, field sportS
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Appendix B:.. Inventory
a-2:;>
..-..
<:::I
,-
i!I¡I:~I,-III:I...:.l:i.I.I.I¡II..III...¡¡.:¡¡~il- Fresh Water Front Feet Front Water
Acres Surface Area Fresh Water Salt Water Historical or Cultural Picnic Units Miscellaneous
Mats Mats Boat Launch 1.0 - - 125 - -- restroom, boat ramp
Pt Hadlock Boat Launch 0.25 - - 100 - - day use only: boat launch, loading dock
Gardiner Boat Launch --- - - 40 - -- boat ramp, restroom
Port Townsend Boat
Haven Boat Launch 26.0 - - 4,400 - 5 restroom, showers, fuel
Quilcene Marina Boat
Launch 50.0 - - 1,500 - 6 swim floats, shower
Quincy Street Dock ---- - --- 70 Historical - convnercial
l'\:;
¡.....
~.
:Þo
~
. "
00
c..rc
u
Front Water
Salt Water
Front Feet
Fresh Water
Fresh Water
Surface Area
Historical or Cultural
Picnic Units
Miscel\aneOUS
Acres
observation
Bell Tower
0.1
10.1
Historical
Chetzemoka Park
650
Historical
12
tot lot playground
Cherry Street Park.
John Pope Marine Park
2.5
0.5
410
6
tot lot pIaygrolnI
Leroy Carroll
Kah Tai Lagoon
7.0
32.0
Sather Park
4.9
nature trails
.oodeveloped
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
AppendixB : . Inventory
a:-3
N
f-4.
,~
,'. '
q
00
CJl
'- ...
...--
c5
,--
... Fresh Water Front Feet Front Water Historical or Picnic
Acres Surface Area Fresh Water Salt Water Cultural Campsites Units Miscellaneous
DevU's lake 40 39 5,200 - - - - fishing
Dosewallips Park 425 - 16,300 2,439 - 147 . 28 -
Duckabush 18 -- - -- - x x fishing, clamming
Fort Flagler 794 -- -- 29,040 historical 90 37 clamming, boat launch
moorage (12), fishing,
Fort Worden 339 -- -- 9,590 historical 50 -- clamming, swimming, hiking
Huelsdonk Bridge 5 - 1,200 - - 4 4 -
lower Hoh 5 - - - - 5 5 -
Minnie Peterson 12 - - - - 6 3 -
Marrowstone Waterfowl
Range 16.25 - - - - - - nonconswnptive uses
Morgan Creek ---- -- - - - 4 4 -
Old Fort Townsend 377 - -- 3,200 - 128 47 -
Pleasant Harbor 5 - --- 100 - - - moorage (8), fishing
Point Whitney Tidelands 34 ---- ---- 2,500 -- --- --- boat ramp, swimming
Rothschild House 0.5 --- __n - historical --- -- tOlW
Shine Tidelands 35 --- -- 12,000 --- ---- --- swimming
Spruce Creek nla --- nla - ---- 6 --- hiking, fishing
Toandos Tidelands 25 --- ---- 10,456 ---- ---- --- clamming
Tarboo lake 2.3 21.6 nla -- _n- --- - boat ramp
Wolfe 134 - --- 16,092 -- ---- 1 clamming
Willoughby Creek 3 -- 500 - --- 2 2 -
picnic, boat launch, (1 00)
Mystery 8ay 11 - - 685 - -- - moorage
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Appendix,B: .. Inventory
.a:-.{
N
¡....:..
.~.
,.
.7"'
'1
00
CJl
r'V
<
0
,-
Hoh Oxbow 10 -- 1,000 - -- 5 2 boat launch
Clearwater 10 -- 500 - -- 7 2 picnic
Cottonwood -- - nla - - x x picnic
Hoh South Fork 2 -- 400 - - 3 x picnic
Anderson Lake 420 58.7 7,380 - - -- 1 boat launch, fishing
Bogacheil 2 -- 838 - - x x -
Copper Mine Bottom 10 - 1,000 - - 6 x -
Crocker Lake 1 65.3 - - - -- - boat launch, fishing, swimming
x = amount unavailable, but resources exist
- Fresh Water Front Feet Front Water Historical or Picnic
Acres Surface Area Fresh Water Salt Water Cultural Campsites Units Miscellaneous
Big Quilcene 4 - 5,000 - - 3 - tents 1 hiking, fishing, hunting
Collins 6 - 400 - - ,16 - tents 1 hiking, fishing, hunting
Dosewallips 425 - 1,000 - - 33 15 fishing, hiking
14 - tents
Elkhorn 7 - 600 - - 4 - tents - hiking, fishing, hunting
24 - tents
Fallsview 7 --- 900 - -- 4 - tents 3 observation point
Graves Creek 9 --- 1,000 -- - 45 x fishing, observation point
Hoh 1 800.0 800 - - 95 50 hiking, fishing
Kalaloch 30 -- - 1,500 - 195 x hiking, fishing
Lena Lake 3 25.8 - - - -- - hiking, fishing
Mount Walker 2 - - - - 10 4 observation point
North Fork 2 -- 400 - - 10 - camping
Queets 1,300 - 400 - - 10 - hiking
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Appendix'B:'lrivenìory .
a-5
¡~
¡....;.
,.
00
c.J1
c. )
<
=
(-
Ouilcene Fish Hatchery 14 - 1,000 - cultural --- --- tour
Rainbow 3 - - - - 7 7 hiking, fishing
26 - tents
Seal Rock 5 - - 7,920 - 6 trailers 10 public oyster beds
Steelhead 6 - 300 - - 5 2 hiking, fishing, hunting
0-'
.,
x = amount unavailable, but resource exist
"0"',0,' ~:l Fresh Water Front Feet
~f Surface Fresh Front Water Historical or Picnic
00"'0 ,#i~ Acres Area Water Salt Water Cultural Camosites Units Miscellaneous
Elks 55.7 - - - Historical - - golf
lodging, golf, swimming,
Chevy Chase 45.7 - - - - - - tennis, clubhouse
Pope & Talbot 3.0 - - - - - - tennis, golf, restaurant
Morrisonville Campground 2.3 - - - - - - -
Becker's 1 .4 - 1 ,200 400 - - - lodging, restawant
Pt Townsend Tennis Club 2 lots - - - - -- - t8IVIÌS
Lions Club 7 -- - - --- -- -- clamming
American Campground 170 - -- - - 590 - ~
NACO Campground 13 - -- - --- 140 - -
Ross Whitaker 0.25 -- 40 - -- --- 3 shelter
Triton Cove 1.5 --- -- - - 32 - trailer - boat latA1Ch
Kalalie --- -- -- - -- -- - -
Smitty's Trailer Park --- - - - -- n- - -
Discovery Bay Lodge --- - --- - --- --- -- lodging, boat launch
Ecologic Place --- - --- - -- --- -- boat launch
Nature Trails Park 40 --- - - - -- - nature traits
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
ApperidiX' B: Irlventory °
'oå,_o6
Ritter's Fish Pond 0.5 - -- - -- -- --- fishing
Paradise Bay --- - --- - - -- - boat launch
Shine Yacht Club 1 - - unavailable - - - boat launch
Port Ludlow unavailable - - unavailable -- - - rec center, pool
<.
0
r
Miscellaneous
,.
Fresh Water
Surface
Area
Front Feet
Fresh
Water
Front Water
Salt Water
Historical or
Cultural
Acres
N
~
Seal Rock Youth Camp
Camp Parsons Boy Scouts
245.7
3.8
1,500
.....
>
C"
.,
Pt Townsend Grant St School
playfield
00
CJ1
~1110
Pt Townsend High School
. Pt Townsend Junior High
gym, track
pool, playfield
Pt Townsend Grade School
6
tot lot, playfield
tennis (3)
Chimacum School
Quilcene School
tennis, playfield
Brinnon School
playfield
Clearwater School
Pt Townsend Museum
historical &
cultural
museum
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Appendix,B: Iriventory .
ti,.- 7, .
Appendix C: Summary Park, Recreation, and Open Space Assets by Type
COUNTY-WIDE SHORELINE (1,434 miles)
MarineShoreline...................................... 170miles
River Shoreline ....................................... 342miles
Creek and Stream Shoreline .............................. 856miles
Lake Shoreline ............................. 26.7 miles on 162 lakes
LakeSurfaceAcres................................. 1,360.9acres
TidalMarshes ............................. 30 miles (approximately)
PARK AND RECREATION ASSETS
Sites........................................... 113minimum
TotalAcreage ................................... 5,819minimum
Water Oriented........................................ 52 sites ,
1.Marine .......................................116,226feet
2.River......................................... 66,838 feet,
3. Lake Surface ..................................... 389 acres ",-
Salt Water AC'.ces~ Sites
1. Public ...............................................1"
2.Private ................................................
FreshWaterAcce~sSitAs .....................................6
Non-Urban Trails. . . . . . . . . " . . . . . . . . . . . .. 85 miles, 90% on private land
Scenic Roads ........................................ 354miles
Campsites .............................................1,754
Picnic Units .............................................293
SPECIALIZED RECREATIONAL ASSETS
Tennis Courts:
1. Public ...............................................11
2.Private ...............................................8
Golf Facilities .............................................3
....................................... (tw09-hole,one18-hole)
Boat Moorage Facilities:
1. Public ........................"....................... 5
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Appendix C: Summary of Assets by Type
21 rM,;855 Q- 8
,VOL
2. Private
. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 2
Boat Moorage Ramps:
1. Public ...............................................17
a.marine..................... ....................11
b.lake ......................... ..6
Field Sport Areas ..... ................... ..... ..8
Spectator Sport Areas ........................................2
RecreåtionCenter ......................... ..........1
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Appendix C: Summary of Assets by Type .¡,;
21 rM,' 858. Q- 9
VOL
Appendix D: Planning Areal of Eastern Jefferson County
OLYMPIC
NATIONAL FOREST
~.
MARROWSTONE
>-
Eo-
Z
;:¡
0
u
:::a
~
:S
u
--
~
t
EASTERN JEFFERSON COUNTY
COMMUNITY PLANNING AREAS
JEFFERSON COUNTY PLANNING DEP¡.RTMENT
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Appendix D: Planning Areas
2t ;,~r; 857 a - 10
VOL
Appendix E: Planning Commission Workshops: May 1990
PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP: MAY 23,1990
Planning Commi~~ion: Sam Swanson, Peter Badame, John IIIman, Tom Berg, Dan
Titterness, Dick Shipman, Fred Grove
Park~ Advi~ory Board: Rick Tollefson, Ben Pedersen, AI Gierch
Staff: Gary Rowe, Director of Public Works, Carter Breskin, Public Works, Andrea
Fontenot, Port of Port Townsend, Steve Corra, City of Port Townsend, Jerry Smith,
Planning Department
Attendance: 3 visitors
Report:
Many comments were received from the Planning Commission. They were:
1. Need to develop an Open Space section in the plan.
2. Describe the acquisition process.
3. Discuss in the "Planning Process" section the need for small district surveys
related to special projects proposed in that district.
4. Discuss the annual update procedure for the plan; how the process would work.
5. Describe the relationship between the parks capital improvement plan and the'
overall capital improvement plan.
6. In Chapter 5' Park and Recreation Demand~ and Needs, consider an explanation
of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th priorities, all trails, and a better way to interpret this,
perhaps by listing other priorities, Le., 5th, 6th, 7th, etc.
7. Also, in Chapter 5, the "Never" used facilities listing may be misinterpreted; place
a footnote discussing this.
8. In Chapter 10' Capital Improvement, if we are considering a swimming pool, it
should be shown in the list.
9. All water access projects should have consideration of the port in a cooperative
project.
General Comments:
For trails, the East Marrowstone Road should be the choice for bicycle trail route. It
would be valuable to connect Fort Townsend to Fort Worden. The Public Works has
considered a grant program for communities, with the County providing cash grants
for park and recreation projects if the grant can be matched within the community,
through community volunteer labor, etc. There was also discussion of the need for
acquisition, and community concern regarding acquisition. The Planning Commission
and the Parks Advisory Board agreed upon the necessity for working closely together
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Appendix E: Workshops, 1990
21 rAf/858 a - 11
VOL
in the future.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: MAY 30,1990
Planning Commission: Sam Swanson, Peter Badame, John lUman, Tom Berg, Mary
Ragon, Dick Shipman, Fred Grove, Gene Seton, Dan Titterness
Parks Advisory Board: Rick Tollefson, Ben Pedersen, Wait Hoffman
Staff: Carter Breskin, Public Works, Andrea Fontenot, Port of Port Townsend, Warren
Steurer, Recreation
Attendance: 4 visitors
Report:
The commission expressed concern that the proposed Olympic-Discovery Trail would
be used more by tourists than it would be by local residents, and supported the idea
of a comprehensive (county-wide) trail, linking communities. One member felt that
people in Brinnon and Ouilcene would not benefit from the trail. There was a
suggestion that the funding sources as shown in the capital improvement section
should be more clearly identified. There was discussion about the swimming pool
south of the city limits, and the need for local citizen input was stressed, including
representatives from Ouilcene and the Tri-Area. There was a general discussion'
about the new legislation for 1 % Real Estate Excise Tax, and the funding effect it
would have. Public input including a discussion about the need to include
maintenance costs in the capital improvement section, and the confusion of indicating
the capital expenditure for trails, when a comprehensive trails plan has not been
done. Also, if a swimming pool is to be considered, a more complete recreation
center should be contemplated. Current improvements to playing fields was
requested, particularly safety improvements. It was also requested to keep in mind
the need for new fields and facilities. The maintenance impact that the increased
population is putting on existing facilities was discussed. The need for a prioritization
system or criteria for projects and acquisition was brought-up by the commission.
Recommendation:
The plan was recommended for approval in principal, with the request that the plan
be expanded to address the maintenance issue as well as a discussion of
prioritization. The commission further selected three members to Attend the Board
of County Commissioners hearing: Sam Swanson, Peter Badame, Dick Shipman.
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Appendix E: Workshops, 1990
a-12
2:1 ¡~r,,851
VD!-
JEFFERSON COUNTY PARKS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PUBLIC WORKSHOP
HEARINGS
Data: May 14, 1 990
Location: Port Ludlow
Staff: Carter Breskin, Public Works, Andrea Fontenot, Port of Port Townsend, Warren
Steurer, Recreation
Roard: Rick Tollefson, AI Gierch
Attendance: 0
Report:
No citizens attended this meeting; staff and board members left at 7:30 PM.
Data: May 16,1990
Location: Ouilcene
Staff: Carter Breskin, Public Works, Andrea Fontenot, Port of Port Townsend,
Warren Steurer, Recreation
Board: Rick Tollefson, AI Gierch, Wait Hoffman
Attendance: 22 citizens
Report:
There was a large, interested group attending this meeting. The meeting started
promptly at 7:00 PM, and adjourned at 9:00 PM. A presentation was made of each
chapter of the plan. Considerable discussion took place regarding the Capital
Improvements section of the plan. A large number of the attendants had previously
received the plan, and were well informed. The major topic of discussion involved
recreation: there is a good deal of concern for teenagers in particular having some
place to go after school. The attendants want to see cooperation between the
schools and the county to provide programs and a place for youth. The swimming
pool also was discussed, with a strong sentiment expressed that a pool should be
placed closer to Ouilcene, at some midpoint between Ouilcene and the Tri-Area.
Another suggestion was made to construct two small pools, one in Ouilcene and one
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Appendix E: Workshops, 1990
21 rAG>860 a -/3
'JOL
in Chimacum. There was little support for, and some negative response to the trail
system. The citizens stated they would rather see youth recreation needs taken care
of first. They feel that the trail system is taken care of inside Olympic National Park.
It was agreed that interested citizens would come to the June 6 Parks Advisory Board
meeting to discuss the youth recreation issue, and that the Parks Advisory Board
would make a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. Before
adjournment, it was suggested that the center could be left open for those people
that would like to get together to discuss the recreation issue with Warren Steurer
and a representative of the schools. These people met after the adjournment. They
said that they would be able to staff a center with parent support.
Those attending from the Brinnon area would like to see tennis courts and more
cooperation with the county. They would also like to see a "youth advocacy" task
force established.
D.a.t.e: May 21,1990
Location: Tri-Area Community Center
Staff: Gary A. Rowe, Director of Public Works, Carter Breskin, Public Works,
Warren Steurer, Recreation, Andrea Fontenot, Port of Port Townsend
Board: Rick Tollefson, Helen Shold, AI Gierch, Virginia Dignan, Ben Pedersen
Attendance: 26 (including County Commissioner B.G. Brown)
Report:
Considerable discussion arose around the "Skunk Island" acquisition issue, and
property acquisition by the County in general. Many that Attended urged acquisition
by the County, and continued preservation of all historical/cultural areas. A member
of the Quillayute tribe was in Attendance, and strongly supported the preservation of
the area. There was discussion of the proposed comprehensive trail system and the
potential need to have a person in charge of the trail system working for the county.
Discussion of a handicapped accessible wetland viewing area along the railroad right
of way (a project involving the Port, City and Port Townsend Mill, and proposed by
the Lloyd family) was urged by attendants representing the Audubon Society.
Another important issue to those attending was the conservation of Chimacum Creek,
by acquisition of the surrounding properties or by c,onservation easements. The 1 %
Real Estate Excise tax was discussed and there was considerable support for
institution of the tax, and encouragement for the Parks Advisory Board to recommend
that the County Commissioners levy the tax. Working more closely with the
Chimacum and Quilcene school districts was emphasized.
VOL
21 f',~r,~861.
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Appendix E: Workshops, 1990
Q- 14
Another contingent was concerned about maintenance at the parks, and that concern
for good maintenance should be considered when acquiring or developing a park.
One person brought up the possibility of using county property in the Port Hadlock
area for a walking trail, and for other activities, and the potential for using a county
gravel pit on Rhody Drive for trail connections.
D.a.ta.: May 24, 1 990
location: Gardiner Community Center
Staff: Carter Breskin, Public Works, Andrea Fontenot, Port of Port Townsend, Warren
Steurer, Recreation
Board: Rick Tollefson, Virginia Dignan
Attendance: 7 (including County Commissioner George Brown)
Report:
Discussion in this district was quite diverse, with concern about the need to acquire
more waterfront, as very little is accessible to the public in the area. The port spoke
to the question regarding the Gardiner Boat launch (the Port leases the site; the
owner is presently unwilling to sell the area), and the potential need for a launch site'
on east Discovery Bay. The trail was also a topic of discussion, with several there
supporting the idea of a comprehensive trail system, with alternate routes. They felt
the comprehensive trail plan should show currently used routes, and how to find
them, and there was discussion on some of the history of the Gardiner area, and the
possibility of installing historic markers on the trail. The need for historical/cultural
preservation was also expressed. The potential for a swimming pool in the Chimacum
area was seen as a good idea, although the new Sequim facility is also available to
them. The Gibbs lake Master Plan project was discussed, with concern expressed
that the area not be developed in any way, that it should be left as is. A possible
acquisition in the Pleasant Harbor area was brought up, and the need to have
property acquisition procedures incorporated in the plan.
D.a.ta.: May 29, 1990
Location: County Courthouse, Port Townsend
Staff: Carter Breskin, Public Works, Andrea Fontenot, Port of Port Townsend, Warren
Steurer, County Recreation
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Appendix E: Workshops, 1990
21 r~f,; 862 a - 15
VOL
Board: Rick Tollefson, Walt Hoffman, Helen Shold" Larry Scott, Virginia Dignan
Attendance: 9
Report:
The need for another swimming pool (indoor) was discussed. The current conflict at
the Port Townsend facility over pool temperature might be alleviated by building two
pools. Although Port Townsend residents would like to see another pool in Port
Townsend, having a facility outside of town would be acceptable, since some are
going to Sequim anyway. There was concern over the land adjacent to the Thomas
Oil facility downtown is being developed into condominiums, and whether it could be
acquired for a park site. Staff explained that those concerned should contact the City
Parks Board. The need for adequate procedures that the public can be made aware
of for acquisition concerns was discussed. The board and staff stressed the
importance of communication with local government through the Parks Advisory
Board.
The need for a "Waterfront Plan" inside the city was discussed by Port Staff.
Questions were asked relating to the status of the South Indian Island Parks, and
concern that archaeologist Joseph Waterhouse, Jr. be contacted. Mr. Waterhouse
has apparently been to the Indian Island site, and is concerned over preservation
related to Indian culture. One person stated that it would be good to have an
interpretive trail in that area and at the Skunk Island site. A discussion fallowed
about what the lines of development were-are interpretive sites O.K.?
There was discussion regarding the 1 % Real Estate Excise Tax, and what people
could do regarding getting the issue on the ballot" General expression of being in
favor of the tax, wanting to help. The board stated that it would be recommending
that the Commissioners put the issue on the November ballot, and that the board was
aware of at least one group working towards the goal of getting the issue on the
ballot.
One person spoke to address several issues: endorsing the plan, calling it an
excellent, visionary plan, hoping it would be implemented. Citizens also wanted to
see more interconnectedness of boat launch/recreation facilities in the Port. They
stated there has been far too much development of the shorelines by private
interests; there is very little public access, and they want to see more public
ownership. Discussion took place on the heavy increase in population, and fear of
its consequences. Will local government only go on putting out "brush fires"? It is
necessary to do comprehensive planning, and this plan is a step in the right direction.
They liked the discussion in the plan of the planning process. They were also very
much concerned about the money-where will it c:ome from? The staff explained that
money could come from various sources, includin~~ grants, levies, and the 1 % Real
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Appendix E: Workshops, 1990
?1 'H,8c:.<") a-16
.,." ¡. U.~
VOL
Estate Excise Tax, but that the Board of County Commissioners is ultimately
responsible for adequately funding the plan goals, and the parks maintenance. They
urged adding an administrative position to the Public Works to handle all of the
required planning and paperwork associated with the parks vision, and with keeping
the plan current.
One person discussed the need for playing fields in depth, and that the city needed
an additional playing field; that there are not enough in the city. They suggested
more dialogue with the School Districts in general about the playing fields, because
the sehool and County Recreation have the same needs. They also suggested
combining other elements in a playing field, such as: trails, picnic areas, open space.
A major field/recreation complex should be located where the most growth is taking
place in the county, which is possibly the "Tri-Area". The question was raised
"Would it be possible to have the county own an area surrounding the complex that
could be used to generate funds for maintenance, such as housing?". Staff explained
that it could be possible, and that within the department discussion had taken place
about possible location of low-income housing.
Another request was for better utilization of the Little League fields. They should be
able to be used for other events, not just for Little League. It was brought up that
the Fairgrounds fields are in really bad shape, and need more care.
The need for better maintenance was brought up. Some urged that the county
increase its maintenance staff. The city has twice as many staff, and much less area'
to care for.
The need for better boat ramps, and better parking at boat ramps was raised. It was
also urged that parking lots at ramps and at other facilities didn't have to be ugly, and
more energy should be put into better designs for parking lots. The discussion
continued, with the Port being asked about their obligation to recreational activities.
The question was asked: "Can recreation facilities be inside. of the airport area?".
Port staff responded by explaining that activities would have to be compatible with
the current use of the property, and that it would be reviewed. An interesting (and
humorous) discussion followed with the possibility of playing fields in the runway
area. Someone suggested that picnic tables could be placed in such a way that
people could picnic and watch the planes. It was brought up that more open space
needed to exist at the Boat Haven in Port Townsend.
A discussion of addressing the need for viewpoints took place. It was stated that a
view of Protection Island (a bird sanctuary) could be accomplished at the end of
McMinn Road and/or Middlepoint Road. It was emphatically stated that the quality
and character of the County needs to be kept; it is rapidly disappearing. County
roads could provide more scenic beauty and also provide adjoining trails if more right
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Appendix E: Workshops, 1990
a-/7
21 rAe; 864.':;
VOL
of way could be obtained, perhaps 100 feet rather than the standard 60 feet. This
would allow a buffer between traffic and pedestrians/bicyclists, etc. Staff explained
that the department has considered having developers give more right of way for
trails and adjoining greenbelts and open space, rather than putting their 10% open
space requirements into an isolated area. This was described as working with the
. developers towards a more comprehensive system. One person mentioned parking
at Chimacum School, how it dominated the front of the school, and that parking
should be looked at in a more creative fashion.
The issue of "sensitive areas" was brought up, with a recommendation that
coordination between various groups, such as Water Quality, Audubon, Watershed
Council, etc. be a goal. The need for wildlife habitat and wildlife corridors in
conjunction with open space was stressed. This brought up the discussion of open
space, and the board said that they were considering devoting a separate chapter to
open space.
It was suggested that the county acquire the DNR trust lands as open space and for
wildlife habitat. The board stressed the necessity of the public coming to them with
information about sensitive areas, and ideas or any other questions regarding
acquisition, etc. The board also stated that everyone needs to work together to know
what are the sensitive areas. People very definitely care and are concerned.
It was suggested that the document be dedicated to preserving the quality of life in
the bounty.
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Appendix E: Workshops, 1990
21 ¡,~':865 a-18
lVOL
Appendix F: The Port of Port Townsend
The Port of Port Townsend shares similar responsibilities with Jefferson County in the
provision of park and recreational facilities. To assist one another in meeting these
responsibilities, the Port and the County have joined in the creation of this Plan. This
Plan is the product of a year-long effort by citizens of Jefferson County and local
government.
A few separate measures are necessary for the Port to undertake in the adoption of
this plan. These are the creation of the Port's recreational goal and strategy, an
action program, and a capital improvement program. These are presented below. To
lend an understanding of the Port's authority concerning park and recreation facilities,
authorizing legislation is discussed first.
Authori7ing Legislation'
Port Districts were created by Title 53 of the Revised Code of Washington in 191 1.
The following chapters from this statute relate to recreational facilities: tourism
promotion, authorization for park and recreation facilities, and local coordination.
Chapter 63 08 266 Tourism promotion authorized' Any port district in this state,
acting through its commission, has power to expend monies and conduct promotion
of resources and facilities in the district or general area by advertising, publicizing, or
otherwise distributing information to attract visitors and encourage tourist expansion.
[1984 c 122 sec 10.]
Chapter 63 08 260 Park and recreation facilities: A port district may construct,
Improve, maintain, and operate public park and recreation facilities when such
facilities are necessary to more fully utilize boat landings, harbors, wharves and piers,
air, land, and water passenger and transfer terminals, waterways, and other port
facilities authorized by law pursuant to the port's comprehensive plan of harbor
improvements and industrial development. [1965 c 81 sec. 1.]
Chapter 63.08.270 Park and recreation facilities-Approval of other agencies' Before
undertaking any such plan for the acquisition and operation of any park or
recreational facility the proposed plan therefor shall be first submitted in writing to the
director of the park and recreation commission and to the. governing body of any
county or municipal park agency having jurisdiction in the area. The state's director
and/or such county or municipal park agency shall examine the port's proposed plan,
and may disapprove such proposed plan if it is found to be in conflict with state or
local park and recreation plans for the same area. If such proposed port plan is
disapproved the port district shall not proceed further with such plan. If the state
director or the governing body of the county or municipal agency does not respond
to the port within sixty days, it shall be deemed that approval has been granted.
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Appendix F: Port of Port Townsend
21 rM;;86E a - /9
VOL
[1965 c 81 sec. 2.]
Recreational Goal
The goal of this program is to provide more opportunities for public access and
enjoyment of the marine nearshore and other Port 'facilities, including the airport.
Strategy
This will be accomplished by (¡) yearly identifying improvements to the existing
facilities that will make the facility appeal to a broader group of users; rm maintaining
facilities to a high standard of safety; rim acquiring additional facilities according to
the demand, need, and affordability.
Actinn Program
Public Access: In 1995-1996, the Port will construct a new boat launch facility at the
Port Townsend Boat Haven. The Port has also identified as priority projects the public
access point at the Point Hudson jetty, and improvements to the Ouilcene Boat Haven
launch ramp. Both of these projects are scheduled to be completed in 1996. In
addition, the Port of Port Townsend and the City ()f Port Townsend have identified
mutual interest in acquiring the Thomas Oil site, a waterfront property located directly
adjacent to the Port's Point Hudson property. The; parcel will provide a vital link in
the public access to Port Townsend's waterfront.
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
Appendix F: Port of Port Tciwnsend
21 rAL; 867 a - 20
_VOL
Appendix G: Jefferson County Population by Age Group 1980, 1990, 1993
Age .1.9B.Q % of Total jJlgQ % of Total Est 'ei 1 993 % of Total
Gmup Population POpl Ilation POpl Ilation Population Population POpl Ilation
::~:I~K:~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~ ~:::::::::::::::i::~b.I:i::::i::::::::i::::::::: ::~::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::::::::I~I::::::::::::: :::::;i:::i::~:~:iJ.:::::::::::::::~::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I]:I:¡::::::::::: :::¡::::::::~::lliil"::::::::::::::::::::::: :i:::::::::::::::::::::::::¡::::i~:' "",,'.
5-9 1 ,039 6. 5 1 ,400 6. 9 1 , 6 1 4 6. 9
~::~;~ll~:i:I:::::::::¡~:::::::::::::: :::::::::::::;:i::~:~::J:I::i::::::::::::::::::: ili:::::::::::::::::::::::~:::¡:::::::i~~::::::::::¡:: :::¡¡:::¡:~:,:¡~ljÎ:¡¡¡::¡::::¡::::;:::::' :::¡¡::¡:¡:¡:¡::::::::::::¡::::::~~;I:::::::¡:¡¡:¡ :::::::::::~¡¡~Iii¡¡:¡:::::::¡¡:::::::::: :::¡:~:~:::::¡::::::~:¡:¡:::¡::::~;:i::::::::i¡::
1 5- 1 9 1 , 1 2 1 7.0 1 ,058 5. 3 1 , 1 73 5 .0
:¡:::ið.~g::::::::::¡::::::::~::::: :::¡::::::::::::::::::::¡¡ä:~:::::.:::::::¡:¡:¡:::i:: ¡:::::::~¡:::~::::¡::¡::::::::¡:~::¡::i~:~:¡:¡:~::::::::~ :::::::::::::::::::::j¡I~:::::::::::::::::::::: :¡:::¡::::::::::~:::::::::::::::¡i¡¡¡~:::::¡::¡:::: :::~:::::¡::¡:::::::IIJ.¡:::::::::¡::¡::::::::: :¡:::::;::¡:::::::::::::::::¡::::I[@::¡:::~:::::
25-29 1 ,294 8 1 923 4. 6 970 4. 1
¡::::I;IJ:::¡:¡:::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::¡¡::::~:¡~$.~i:::i::::::::~::::::::: :¡¡::::::¡¡:::~::::::::~:::::::::::::::i~I::::::::::::: ::::::::::::~::¡I~~::::::::::::¡:::;:¡::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::¡:¡I:¡::~::¡¡::::::::::: :¡::::::::::~::~~:,:I::::::::¡::::::::::::¡: :::::::;¡¡::::::¡:¡¡::::::::¡:¡:I~I:::::::i:::¡'
35-39 992 6. 2 1 ,76 1 8 7 2,09 1 8.9
¡i!!il..::::::::!:::::::::::¡:::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::11\::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::;::;:::¡;~I¡::::::~:::::: ::::::¡;¡::i¡:~ljl::::¡¡~:::::::::::::::: :::::::~:~¡¡¡~:¡:¡:¡~:¡::¡:¡¡:~¡:;j:i¡¡¡:::::::::: ¡¡¡:¡¡¡¡¡::I:::IJ.I:¡¡¡::~::::::::¡:¡:¡¡:: :::::¡¡¡::::::¡¡::::::::¡:~:¡¡¡¡:I~J.:::::¡¡¡¡i¡¡[
45-49 734 4. 6 1 ,23 1 6 1 1 ,6 1 9 6 .9
¡:iiil~jl!i!i::iiiji¡iiiiiiiiii:: ::i:::i::¡¡::::!iii¡i¡¡¡:I$.~:::::!::::~:¡i::¡:i:::: ::::::::::::i::¡:¡¡¡:i¡¡:¡i¡:!:¡::::¡::i~g¡::¡¡::¡¡;¡:¡ :;:¡::;:::::i¡::::II:I:¡::::::::::::::::::¡¡ ¡:::::::::::::::::::::::::i:::::I;:I::::¡¡¡:;:::: ::::::::::¡~¡¡~~Ii:::::::::::¡:¡::i:::::i ¡¡:¡:¡;i:i¡:¡:::::¡¡¡:¡:::::::::~¡:$.:¡::¡:¡:¡::::
5 5-59 1 ,076 6. 7 1 ,032 5 1 1 , 1 90 5 1
:::tli.~¡~:::::¡¡::¡¡:¡:::¡¡ ::::¡::¡¡:¡¡::::~tØäi:::::¡::::i¡:;i:¡:::::: ~::::i:i¡¡¡~:¡¡¡¡¡i:¡i¡¡:¡;¡:¡:::tl~ä::~:::¡::¡::: '::¡:¡::::::~:i:::i¡~¡I:::¡:::::::¡:::::::¡¡: :¡:i:::::ii:;:ii:::::¡::::::::¡j~I::¡:¡i¡:::¡:i ::::¡:::¡¡¡j::~ail¡~::i::¡¡¡¡::::i:::: ¡¡i¡:::::i:¡:¡i¡i:::::::i~i¡i::li.:iii¡¡i:::¡:
65-69 1 ,004 6. 3 1 ,5 1 9 7. 5 1 , 6 1 4 6 .9
:::¡ili:4J:~:¡~¡¡:::¡~::¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ !:¡~:i:::::¡¡¡¡¡¡:¡¡:¡¡::ill':::¡::¡:;:::::¡::¡::::: ::¡¡;;¡¡:¡¡:¡i:i¡¡¡::¡¡¡:::::::::::::I~~:¡::::::i::¡: :::::;~:~::~~:J::i:::::¡¡:::¡::¡¡¡::::¡¡. :::::::::::::i:::::¡¡:¡¡:::¡::¡¡~:¡ø.¡:¡¡¡::::::¡¡ i::::::¡¡:;~::~\l.I:~:::::¡¡:¡::::¡::::: :::¡:::¡:i)¡¡:::::¡¡::¡::::::¡¡i)l~ii::::::::¡i
75-79 380 2.4 760 3.8 873 3. 7
:¡::JI..i¡¡:i)¡:::¡¡¡¡::¡¡¡¡:::: i:::::¡::¡::::;::¡:i::::I¡j:l¡i)¡::::::::::i::¡:;;:; ::¡¡::¡::::::i:::::::::::¡~¡:¡:::¡:¡;:¡i::~K:¡:::¡:¡::¡: :¡;~:::;¡:¡::::::::¡:III:::¡::::¡:::::i:::i:¡: ¡:::::i:::¡;:::¡¡;:¡¡;:¡:::;:::¡I;ó¡:::::::::::: ;:::¡¡::::::::::¡:¡:1I.1¡¡¡¡¡¡:ii:::::¡::¡:::¡: :i:¡¡i::¡i::¡:¡¡::¡::::::::::::¡ltl¡:ii:::iii)
85 + 1 90 1 2 279 1 .4 340 1 .4
Iiíi¥BII::::¡::::::: :::::::¡:¡igilii..:::::¡:::::::::¡::::::: :::¡:::¡:::~:::::~:::Iill:::::::¡:II:f Iililiì:4i.::::::::¡::II:::: :::::::::::::::::::a:Oit1:::¡::::::¡::¡:¡: IBilie.:::¡::::::¡:::¡:::::¡:: ~:I:::~::::::::::i:íBI¡:I::::¡¡:¡:::
Source: US Census, and Office of Financial Management" 1993 Data Book"
Jefferson County Parks Comprehensive Plan
21 í-M; 86!~ APpendi: ~:2~opulation
1101-