HomeMy WebLinkAboutAppendix TCompliance with LEED Standards
01/09/2018 | Page 1 of 20
01/09/2018 | Page 2 of 20
01/09/2018 | Page 3 of 20
01/09/2018 | Page 4 of 20
01/09/2018 | Page 5 of 20
01/09/2018 | Page 6 of 20
01/09/2018 | Page 7 of 20
01/09/2018 | Page 8 of 20
01/09/2018 | Page 9 of 20
01/09/2018 | Page 10 of 20
01/09/2018 | Page 11 of 20
01/09/2018 | Page 12 of 20
01/09/2018 | Page 13 of 20
01/09/2018 | Page 14 of 20
01/09/2018 | Page 15 of 20
Pleasant Harbor Conceptual Load Estimates
01/09/2018 | Page 16 of 20
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
I.
D
.
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
Si
z
e
Nu
m
b
e
r
of
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Un
i
t
s
Lo
a
d
De
n
s
i
t
y
(V
A
/
S
F
)
Lo
a
d
Subtotal
(V
A
)
Load Total (VA)
Go
l
f
Te
r
r
a
c
e
s
an
d
Co
n
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
Ce
n
t
e
r
/
S
p
a
‐
T1
(R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
)
23
5
,
3
6
9
19
1
15
3
,
5
3
0
,
5
3
5
Go
l
f
Te
r
r
a
c
e
s
an
d
Co
n
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
Ce
n
t
e
r
/
S
p
a
‐
T1
(C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
)
36
,
0
0
0
25
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
Go
l
f
Te
r
r
a
c
e
s
an
d
Co
n
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
Ce
n
t
e
r
/
S
p
a
‐
T1
(T
o
t
a
l
)
27
1
,
3
6
9
19
1
4,430,535
Go
l
f
Te
r
r
a
c
e
s
an
d
Co
n
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
Ce
n
t
e
r
/
S
p
a
‐
T2
15
5
,
9
1
5
15
3
15
2,338,725
Go
l
f
Te
r
r
a
c
e
s
an
d
Co
n
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
Ce
n
t
e
r
/
S
p
a
‐
T3
92
,
6
9
5
88
15
1,390,425
Go
l
f
Te
r
r
a
c
e
s
an
d
Co
n
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
Ce
n
t
e
r
/
S
p
a
‐
T4
92
,
6
9
5
88
15
1,390,425
Se
a
Vi
e
w
Vi
l
l
a
s
(2
3
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
‐
pe
r
ea
c
h
,
as
s
u
m
e
eq
u
a
l
si
z
e
)
16
,
6
3
2
15
2
4
9
,
4
8
0
Se
a
Vi
e
w
Vi
l
l
a
s
(2
3
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
‐
to
t
a
l
lo
a
d
)
38
2
,
5
4
2
20
6
15
5,738,130
Go
l
f
Vi
s
t
a
s
(5
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
‐
pe
r
ea
c
h
,
as
s
u
m
e
eq
u
a
l
si
z
e
)
14
,
2
5
6
15
2
1
3
,
8
4
0
Go
l
f
Vi
s
t
a
s
(5
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
‐
to
t
a
l
lo
a
d
)
71
,
2
8
0
44
15
1,069,200
Ma
r
i
t
i
m
e
Vi
l
l
a
g
e
(R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
)
55
,
8
0
3
66
15
8
3
7
,
0
4
5
Ma
r
i
t
i
m
e
Vi
l
l
a
g
e
(C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
)
13
,
3
3
4
25
3
3
3
,
3
5
0
Ma
r
i
t
i
m
e
Vi
l
l
a
g
e
(T
o
t
a
l
)
72
,
4
5
3
66
1,170,395
Pl
e
a
s
a
n
t
Ha
r
b
o
r
Ho
u
s
e
3,
3
1
6
1
15
49,740
B&
B
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
1,
4
6
1
1
15
21,915
Ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
/
S
t
a
f
f
86
,
9
3
1
52
15
1,303,965
Wa
t
e
r
Tr
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
t
s
(P
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
by
WR
P
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
)
8,
5
2
1
433,400
To
t
a
l
Lo
a
d
fo
r
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
(i
n
kV
A
)
:
19,337
Pl
e
a
s
a
n
t
Ha
r
b
o
r
‐
Co
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
Lo
a
d
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
fo
r
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
01/09/2018 | Page 17 of 20
Mason County PUD Letter
01/09/2018 | Page 18 of 20
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
OF MASON COUNTY KARL DENISON, Commissioner
N. 21971 Hwy. 101 JACK JANDA, Commissioner Shelton, Washington 98584 RON GOLD, Commissioner
(360) 877-5249 1-800-544-4223 FAX (360) 877-9274
November 18, 2013
Brendon Inman, PE
Hargis
brendoni@hargis.biz
Dear Mr. Inman,
In response to your questions with regard to Mason PUD 1’s ability to serve the Pleasant Harbor Resort at
“Full Build-Out” I would like to elaborate a little since it is not a simple “yes” or “no” answer.
PUD 1 is ready and able to meet the total capacity needs of the project at full build-out. As we have
previously discussed with the Pleasant Harbor planning group, this would need to be accomplished through a
phased-in approach, as discussed more fully below in response to your questions.
Short Answers to Your Questions:
1. Does Mason County PUD No.1 currently have capacity to serve this development?
Answer: Not at this time.
2. If the answer to #1 is “not at this time”, at what point would that occur?
Answer: This will require a phased-in approach. The first requirement would be to add cooling
fans on the power transformer in the Duckabush Substation. These fans will give us the capacity to
serve Stage 1, Phases 1-3, as presented on the construction schedule provided by Hemisphere
Engineering, Inc. on June 22, 2011. Beyond the installation of cooling fans in the Duckabush
substation, we will need to perform additional engineering studies and designs to accommodate the
remaining stages/phases of the development.
3. What improvements/upgrades would need to occur to serve the proposed development at full
build out?
Answer: To serve full build-out will require a new substation and associated distribution
feeders.
4. Would PUD improvements be made in phases coincident with the proposed
development?
Answer: Yes; improvements would be made as project loads are added.
In addition to the distribution system additions needed to serve this project, there are also power and
transmission considerations that should be kept in minds as the project unfolds. Under the power sales
contract between PUD 1 and the Bonneville Power Administration (“BPA”), substantial advance notice is
required in order to obligate BPA to serve the project load. For example, notice for service from BPA under
01/09/2018 | Page 19 of 20
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
OF MASON COUNTY KARL DENISON, Commissioner
N. 21971 Hwy. 101 JACK JANDA, Commissioner Shelton, Washington 98584 RON GOLD, Commissioner
(360) 877-5249 1-800-544-4223 FAX (360) 877-9274
its Tier 2 power rates requires up to XX years advance notice. Similarly, under the transmission agreement
between PUD and BPA, obtaining transmission capacity on the BPA system to import a resource acquired to
serve the project requires up to XX years advance notice. I mention these matters so these timing
requirements can be integrated into the project planning process.
I trust these answers are responsive to your question. Should you need any further information, do not
hesitate to contact me.
01/09/2018 | Page 20 of 20