Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout031918_ca09Department of Public Works O Consent Agenda Page 1 of 1 Jefferson County Board of Commissioners Consent Agenda Request To: Board of Commissioners Philip Morley, County Administrator From: Monte Reinders P.E., Public Works Director/ County Engineer/ Agenda Date: March 19, 2018 Subject: Digital Submittal Certification - County Road Administration Board - Reports for 2017 Statement of Issue: The County Road Administration Board (CRAB) requires the periodic submittal of forms and documents related to Jefferson County's management of its road system and road fund. By April 1, 2018, the County must submit the following in digital format: (1) Traffic Law Enforcement Expenditure Certification, (2) Fish Passage Barrier Removal Certification, (3) Annual Certification (with attachments), (4) Annual Construction Report, (5) County Arterial Preservation Report, and (6) Maintenance Management Certification. The first three of these items,(See Attached), requires the certification of the Chair of the Board of Commissioners via signatures on a "Digital Submittal Certification" form for mailing to CRAB. Analysis / Strategic Goals / Pros £t Cons: CRAB establishes Standards of Good Practice for the administration of the County roads program and road fund. CRAB monitors compliance with these standards via the County's regular submittal of data and certifications. The County Engineer and Board of Commissioners must certify that required standards are being met. Annual issuance of a "Certificate of Good Practice" from CRAB is required in order for the County to receive its annual Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax allocation. Fiscal Impact/Cost Benefit Analysis: Public Works has prepared the required documents with assistance from the Auditor's office and the Sheriff's office. The Certificate of Good Practice is required to receive Jefferson County's annual allocation of approximately $1.3 million in Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax. Recommendation: Authorize the Chair to sign and date the "Digital Submittal Certification" form in the two places for the signature of "Chair / Executive." Return to Public Works for processing Department Contact: Monte Reinders P.E., Public Works Director/County Engineer 385-9242 Revf_e_ ed By: �i Phi ' ortey, my A ministrator 311�1_ /ZlIs- Date Jefferson County Reports for 2017 Digital Submittal Certification for Forms Due April 1st A The documents checked below are hereby submitted from Jefferson County for the review and acceptance of the County Road Administration Board. X 2017 RAP Certification of Road Fund Expenditures for Traffic Law Enforcement I hereby certify that the above report is true and accurate and that I have reviewed and approved the report for submission to the Co my Road Administration Bojrdnaordance with WAC 136. Signed: Date: County Sheriff Signed:�� Date: Z County Auditor Signed: Chair / Executive - ----------------------------------- Date: X 2017 Certification of Road Fund Expenditures for Fish Passage Barrier Removal X 2017 Annual Certification I hereby certify that the Fish Passage Removal and Annual Certifications are true and accurate and that I have reviewed and approved the report for submission to the County Road Administration Board in accordance with WAC 136. Signed: _ Chair / Exec Signed: County Enginee ----------------------------------------------- X 2017 Annual Construction Report X 2017 County Arterial Preservation Report X 2017 Maintenance Management Annual Certification I hereby certify that the Annual Construction Repq accurate and that I have reviewed, appro nd Signed: Countv Enqineer submitted said reports to Date: Date: 3Z'I 95 ,n Report, and Maintenance Management Certification are true and County Road Administration Board in accordance with WAC 136. Date: l C.A.R.S. Jefferson County 2017 CERTIFICATION OF ROAD FUND EXPENDITURES FOR TRAFFIC LAW ENFORCEMENT WAC 136-150-022 Page 1 of 1 Total Road Levy: Budgeted Road Levy revenue (as listed on the Road Levy Certification - $4,349,423.00 WAC 136-150-021): Actual Road Levy revenue produced: $4,351,049.36 Traffic Law Enforcement Paid by Road Levy Diversion: Budgeted Road Levy Diversion (as listed on the Road Levy Certification - $720,000.00 WAC 136-150-021): Actual amount of Diverted Road Levy: $720,000.00 Was Diverted Road Levy deposited in a specific and identifiable account Yes (RCW 36.82.040): Traffic Law Enforcement Paid by Road Fund Expenditures: Budgeted cost reimbursements and/or operating transfers from the Road $0.00 Fund: Actual total amount of cost reimbursements and/or operating transfers from $0.00 the Road Fund: Total Road Portion Traffic Law Enforcement Expenditures: $720,000.00 Total Traffic Law Enforcement Expense (ALL COUNTY FUNDS): $871,858.45 RCW 36.79.140 provides that only those counties that during the preceding twelve months have spent all revenues collected for road purposes only for such purposes, including traffic law enforcement, as are allowed by Article II, Section 40 of the Washington State Constitution, are eligible to receive funds from the Rural Arterial Trust Account. This form must be reviewed and certified (on the "Engineer's Certification Form") by: County Sheriff County Auditor OR Charter designated Chief Financial Officer Chair, Board of County Commissioners OR County Executive https://www.crab.wa.gov/cars/ 3/7/2018 3/8/2011 FISH PASSAGE CERTIFICATION WAC 136-150-023 Submitting County: Jefferson Budget Year: 2017 Fish Passaae Barrier Removal Projects Total Project Cost Outside % of Total Cost (25% Project Name Cost of ROW Allowed by WAC) Salmon Creek Bridge- W Uncas Rd $40,473.00 $0.00 0.00% MP0.804 Access Preservation Hoh Rain Forrest $2,110.00 $0.00 0.00% Olympic Nat Park 6.95 Total Expenditures for Fish Passage Barrier Removal Outside County Rights -of -Way Total Annual Road Construction Budget: $4,845,397.00 X 0.005 1/2% of Total Annual Road (Limit of "Outside of Right -of -Way" expense) =$24,226.99 Total Expenditure for Fish Passage Barrier Removal Outside County Right -of -Way $0.00 RCW 36.79.140 provides that only those counties that during the preceding twelve months have spent all revenues collected for road purposes only for such purposes, including removal of barriers to fish passage and accompanying streambed and stream bank repair as specified and limited by RCW 36.82.070 , as are allowed by Article Il, Section 40 of the Washington State Constitution, are eligible to receive funds from the Rural Arterial Trust Account. Jefferson County Annual Certification For Calendar Year 2017 WAC 136-04 MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION A. During 2017 the County Engineer performed the duties and had the responsibilities specified in RCW 36.80.030. B. At any time during 2017 was there a vacancy/change in the position of County Engineer? If so, were the procedures in WAC 136-12 followed? C. The processing of County Road Accident Reports during 2017 complied with WAC 136-28. 3/13/2018 Yes Yes D. Priority Programming techniques were applied to the ranking of all potential projects on the arterial road system in 2017 per Yes WAC 136-14-020. E. As of December 31, 2017 the management of the county road department was in accordance with policies set by the county legislative authority including, but not limited to, the following specific policies required by WAC 136-50-050: *Has your agency sent the most recently adopted version to CRAB WAC 136-50-051? POLICY WAC Re: Organization 136-50-051 Re: Personnel Practices 136-50-052 Re: Complaint Handling 136-50-053 Re: Work for Others 136-50-054 Re: Utility Accommodation 136-50-055 Re: Priority Programming 136-14-030 F. The following were submitted to CRAB in a timely manner: DATE OF CURRENT VERSION 05/22/2017 11/23/2015 07/28/2003 02/10/1986 07/08/2000 04/23/2003 WAC DOCUMENT '17 Six -Year Program '17 Annual Construction Program '17 CAPP Program '17 Road Fund Budget '17 Maintenance Management Work 136-300-060 Plan & Budget '17 Road Levy '16 Certification of Road Fund Exp. 12/12/2016 For Traffic Law Enforcement '16 Engineer's Certification of Fish 12/12/2016 Barrier Removal Costs '16 Certification of Road Fund Exp. 01/23/2017 for Marine Navigation and 136-150-022 Moorage '16 Annual Construction Report '16 CAPP Report '16 Maintenance Management 136-150-024 Certification '16 Annual Certification '16 Road Log Update '17 PMS Certification for CAPA 136-300-090 Eligibility DATE OF CURRENT VERSION 05/22/2017 11/23/2015 07/28/2003 02/10/1986 07/08/2000 04/23/2003 WAC DUE DATE DATE OF ADOPTION / PREPARATION DATE SENT TO CRAB 136-15-050 31 -DEC -16 09/12/2016 12/21/2016 136-16-040 31 -DEC -16 12/12/2016 12/21/2016 136-300-060 31 -DEC -16 12/12/2016 12/21/2016 31 -DEC -16 12/12/2016 12/21/2016 136-11-040 31 -DEC -16 12/12/2016 12/21/2016 136-150-021 01 -FEB -17 01/23/2017 01/31/2017 136-150-022 01 -APR -17 03/27/2017 03/27/2017 136-150-023 01 -APR -17 03/27/2017 03/27/2017 136-150-024 01 -APR -17 03/27/2017 03/27/2017 136-16-050 01 -APR -17 03/27/2017 03/27/2017 136-300-090 01 -APR -17 03/27/2017 03/27/2017 136-11-050 01 -APR -17 03/27/2017 03/27/2017 136-04-030 01 -APR -17 03/27/2017 03/27/2017 136-60-030 01 -MAY -17 04/25/2017 04/25/2017 136-70-070 31 -DEC -17 12/11/2017 12/11/2017 G. Projects to which construction expenditures were charged were all on the originally adopted 2017 Annual Program or as amended per WAC 136-16-042 - Attach Amendments. (If No, please attach a brief explanation.) Explanation: • CR 1896 Access Preservation Hoh Rain Forrest Olympic National Forrest, MP 6.95 — This project had rollover costs into 2017 as it was a Programmed Project from 2016. • CR 2031 Snow Creek Rd Mp 0.84, Culvert Replacement. This project was added to the Annual Road Program by Reso#41-17 H. The County's construction by county forces limit for 2017 computed in accordance with RCW 36.77.065: I. The actual expenditure for construction by county forces as reported in the 2017 Annual Const. Report: J. As required by WAC 136-20-060, a written Bridge and Inspection Report for 2017 was furnished to the legislative authority on (attach a copy): No $1,262,213.75 $7,726.00 11/27/2017 -JA J STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF JEFFERSON In the matter of: Creating a County project RESOLUTION NO. 41 —1 designated as Snow Creek Road MP 0.84 Culvert Replacement. IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that Snow Creek Road, County Road No. 352909, from M.P. 0.81 to M.P. 0.87, be improved as follows: Prepare a preliminary design including geotechnical analysis, hydraulic analysis, land and topographical survey, engineering, and permitting to evaluate alternatives for culvert replacement at milepost 0.84. The preliminary design will be used to apply for grant funding to complete final design and construction. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that an appropriation from the officially adopted road fund budget and based on the County Engineer's estimate is hereby made in the amounts and for the purpose shown: PURPOSE PREVIOUS APPROPRIATION Engineering $ 0 Right of Way Acquisition $ 0 Sub -Total $ 0 Construction: $ 0 TOTAL $ 0 PRESENT APPROPRIATION $ 99,013 This project is included in the officially adopted annual road program as Item No. X The project is hereby made a part of the officially adopted annual road program in accordance with R.C.W. 36.81.130. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that: X The construction is to be accomplished by contract in accordance with R.C.W. 36.77.020 et. seq. The construction is to be accomplished by County forces in accordance with R.C.W. 36.77.065 and W.A.C. 136.18. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF ( tit O L/� ATTEST: 0& Carolyn GdHaway, CMC Deputy Clerk of the Board JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Kathleen Kler, Chair Kate Dean, ber David . SulCan. ember Revised 4/2017 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners Jefferson County Department of Public Works 623 Sheridan St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 385-9160 Monte Reinders, P.E. Public Works Director/County Engineer FROM: Monte Reinders, P.E., Public Works Director/County Engineer/46- DATE: November 1, 2017 SUBJECT: Bridge Condition Report 2017 INTRODUCTION As required by WAC 136-20-060, each county engineer shall furnish the county legislative authority with a written report of the findings of the bridge inspection effort. This report shall be made available to said authority and shall be consulted during the preparation of the proposed six- year transportation program revision. The report shall include the county engineer's recommendations as to replacement, repair or load restriction for each deficient bridge. The resolution of adoption of the six-year transportation program shall include assurances to the effect that the county engineer's report with respect to deficient bridges was available to said authority during the preparation of the program. BRIDGE INVENTORY Jefferson County Public Works has 32 active bridges — see the attached Master Bridge List (Appendix A) for a listing of the county bridges. Jefferson County also has two permanently closed bridges, which are not listed on the Master Bridge List. BRIDGE INSPECTIONS The National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS) and WAC 136-20-030 mandate that public agencies inspect and report on all bridges at least once every two years (routine inspection). Jefferson County staff performs all routine inspections. Special inspections are required for bridges that cannot be inspected adequately from the ground. For these bridges an Under -Bridge Bridge Condition Report 2016 Pagel of 4 Inspection Truck (UBIT) is required. Steel bridges with fracture critical members may also require special inspections with the UBIT and/or other special equipment. Jefferson County has two bridges which require the UBIT inspection and one bridge which requires both the UBIT and the fracture critical inspection (identified in the attached Master Bridge List). Jefferson County currently has a contract with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to perform these inspections. Jefferson County Public Works has split up the bridge inspections so that East Jefferson County bridges are inspected in odd -numbered years and West Jefferson County bridges are inspected in even -numbered years. In conformance with that schedule, Jefferson County completed the biennial inspections for all East Jefferson County bridges in 2017, with the exception of the Contractor's Creek Bridge, which was inspected by WSDOT with the UBIT in July 2016. The completed inspection reports were submitted to WSDOT, which verifies compliance with the NBIS and reports to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). FEDERAL AUDIT In July 2017, FHWA and WSDOT conducted an office and field review of Jefferson County's bridge inspection program. The office review consisted of reviewing the County's individual bridge files for consistency with state and federal requirements. The office review resulted in some minor needed corrections, which are being addressed. The field review consisted of federal and state bridge inspection personnel conducting mock bridge inspections on two of the county's bridges, and comparing their findings with the county's bridge inspection reports for those bridges. The field review resulted in no needed corrections. DEFICIENT BRIDGES All bridges are assigned a sufficiency rating (SR), which is a calculated score based on numbers assigned to all of the bridge elements reviewed by the bridge inspector. The SR is a number from 0 to 100, with 100 being an entirely sufficient bridge, and 0 being an entirely insufficient or deficient bridge. For additional explanation of the sufficiency rating and other ratings see the attached WSDOT publication, Bridges and Structures — Ratings (Appendix B). The sufficiency rating is used to determine if a bridge is eligible for federal rehabilitation or replacement funding. Currently, none of the county's bridges have any major deficiencies, and none are eligible for rehabilitation or replacement. As described in previous Bridge Condition reports, the Tower Creek Bridge is being monitored for potential scour problems associated with down -cutting of the streambed. The Tower Creek streambed experienced significant down -cutting in 2007-2008 due to migration of the Hoh River and heavy flows in Tower Creek. However, based on regular monitoring, the streambed elevation has been relatively stable since 2008. Public Works will continue to monitor this situation. Plans for replacement of the Tower Creek Bridge are in the preliminary engineering phase. This project is being managed by the Federal Highway Administration Western Federal Lands Division, and is being funded completely by a Federal Lands Access Program grant. Bridge Condition Report 2016 Page 2 of 4 POSTED BRIDGES All bridges are required to have a "Load Rating" calculation. The Load Rating establishes how much weight the bridge can carry for several standard configurations of vehicle axle loads. If the load rating calculation shows that a bridge cannot safely carry the legal traffic loads then the bridge must be posted with the appropriate load limits. Jefferson County currently does not have any bridges with load restrictions. The load rating values (in tons) are listed on the attached Master Bridge List (Appendix A). A 2013 FHWA mandate requires that all bridges be load rated for a relatively new class of vehicle, the Specialized Hauling Vehicle (SHV). SHV's are closely -spaced multi -axle single unit trucks introduced by the trucking industry in the last decade. Examples include dump trucks, construction vehicles, solid waste trucks and other hauling trucks. The FHWA has divided bridges into two categories, with the first category requiring updated load ratings by December 31, 2017, and the second category requiring updated load ratings by December 31, 2022. Jefferson County is currently finalizing load ratings for three bridges for the 2017 deadline. An additional twenty-two bridges will need to be re -load rated prior to the 2022 deadline. It is possible that some Jefferson County bridges will need to be load posted for SHV's after the load rating results are known. OBSOLETE BRIDGES The Old Little Quilcene Bridge and the Maple Creek Bridge have been placed in obsolete status and removed from the Master Bridge List. Both are permanently closed to vehicular traffic. This action removes the requirement for biennial bridge inspection. EMERGENCY REPAIRS AND INSPECTIONS In June 2017, a minor repair was performed at Meyers Creek Bridge on Belfrage Road, where a void was discovered under the asphalt in the westerly approach to the bridge. The void was filled in and the surfacing was repaired. MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES Routine maintenance of the county's bridges is conducted by the road maintenance department. Typical routine maintenance consists of deck cleaning, brush clearing, and minor miscellaneous repairs. COMPLETED PROJECTS Completed projects include the following: • A new bridge was added to the system in the summer/fall of 2016. At an unnamed tributary to the Hoh River at Upper Hoh Road MP 6.95, a 21 ft. span, pre -cast, reinforced concrete three -sided structure was constructed. This project replaced an under -sized Bridge Condition Report 2016 Page 3 of 4 culvert where gravel has plugged and spilled out over the roadway numerous times in the past. The new bridge also corrected a fish -passage barrier. The project was funded with I00% funding from the Federal Highway Administration. • An 80 ft. span steel pedestrian bridge was installed over Chimacum Creek as part of the Rick Tollefson Memorial Trail project. This project is expected to be complete in November 2017. The pedestrian bridge will be added to Jefferson County's bridge inventory and inspected on a routine basis, but will not be reported to WSDOT and FHWA, as pedestrian bridges are not part of the federal bridge inspection program. CURRENT PROJECTS Current projects include the following: • An 80 foot span concrete bridge on West Uncas Rd MP 0.804 is in the final design phase. Construction is scheduled for 2018. This project is being funded by a Salmon Recovery Funding Board grant (approx. 85%), a National Fish Passage Program grant (approx. 10%), and local funds (approx. 5%). PROGRAMMED PROJECTS There are no programmed bridge projects at this time. RECOMMENDED PROJECTS There are no recommended bridge projects at this time. Bridge Condition Report 2016 Page 4 of 4 APPENDIX A Jefferson County Public Works Master Bridge List LAST UPDATED: 11/1/17 Total number of bridges in inventory: Total number of permanently closed bridges: Total number of active bridges: Total number of West Jefferson County bridges: Total number of East Jefferson County Bridges 32 32 19 active bridges 1 permanently closed bridge 13 active bridges 1 permanently closed bridge Jefferson County Public Works Master Bridge List East Jefferson County Last Undated: 11/1/2017 z � O c z 2 fi z ae u m BRIDGE TYPE F F z m F- < C • Z � £ - _ F• U <La v7 f F At h _ Y < < aU5 O0. O E- W c1. - w C6r.� C W O z C d 4e jO. R Gi O L Y C OC 4 O Z O C A. < , O p61 zr Superstructure Substructure 7996700 15E Hunts 634509 Hunt Rd. 0.15 27 Reinforced Cone. Cone. Abutment w/ 1971 NO NO NO NO NO 1.18 1.97 STD. 4/15/15 88.92 Slab C.I.P. cone. piles (42 TON) (70TON) 8165100 16E Little 931507 Center Rd. 14.6 64 Reinforced Cone. Cone. Pile cap, 1955 NO NO NO NO 0.63 1.05 STD. 4/15/15159.75 FO Quilcene Slab, Conc. Girder Prestress. Cone. INO (22 TON) (37 TON) River I I piles 8464900 17E Yarr 931507 Center Rd. 3.44 25 Conc. Multiple Web Conc. Abutment w/ 1955 NO NO NO NO NO 0.39 0.66 STD. 4/25/16 64.61 12 MONTH INSPECTION I Girder Prestress. Conc. (14 TON) (23 TON) FREQUENCY Iles 8320300 23E Linger 301309 Linger 0.42 81 Prestress. Conc. Conc. Abutment w/ 1969 NO NO NO NO NO 0.89 1.49 STD. 4/15!15 70.03 Longer Longer Rd. Bulb -T Girder Conc. column over (32 TON) (53 TON) C.I.P. cone. piles 8381400 24E Rocky 250008 Dosewallips 3.01 47 Prestress. Conc. Conc. Abutment w/ 1964 NO NO NO NO NO 0.72 1.20 STD. 4/15/15 76.99 Brook Rd. Bulb -T Girder Conc. Spread (25 TON) (43 TON) footing 8229900 25E Meyers 503409 Belfrage 0.12 30 Timber 'I'imber abutment, 1977 NO NO NO NO NO 21 TON 31 TON S'I'D. 6/27/13 63.58 Rd. timber piles 8488200 26E West Uncas 500209 West Uncas 1.89 61 Reinf. Conc. Slab Conc. Abutment, 1964 NO NO NO NO 0.66 1.10 STD. 4/15/15 82.17 Rd. Cone, column over INO (23 TON) (39 TON) C.I.P. cone, pile 8136900 28E Leland 344009 Rice Lake 0.33 32 Prestress. Conc. Conc. Abutment, 1987 NO NO NO NO NO 1.59 2.66 STD. 4/15/15 88.20 Creek Rd. Slab Conc. spread (57 TON) (95 TON) FO footing 8660000 29E Contractors 501409 Old 3.56 294 Timber Deck, Conc. Pile cap, steel2000 NO NO NO NO NO 0.78 1.31 UBIT 7/24/14 86.41 UBIT EVERY 4 YEARS - Creek Gardiner Timber Girders piles (28 TON) (47 TON) LAST UBIT 7/12/2012 Rd. Page 1 of 2 Jefferson County Public Works Master Bridge List Fac! IPfr-el-..-- Page 2 of 2 W F Z 4 O 62 L BRIDGE TYPE U W H 2 Z cc w 99 Ac 0 00 IL < = z m O z O a -3 i 11 6.c a U 2 O a. p < acs c�a Cd Superstructure Substructure 8754000 31 E Shine Creek 447608 South Point 0.25 70 Prestress. Conc, Coro. Abutment w/ 2005 NO NO NO NO 1.45 1.76 STD. 4/22/15 97.58 Rd. Slab Conc. Pile (64 TON) (108 TON) 8753900 32E Donovan 327508 E Quilcene 0.77 70 Prestress. Conc. Conc. Abutment w/ 2006 NO NO NO ]NNO 1.25 1.62 STA. 4/15/15 89.28 Creek Rd. Slab Conc. Pile (60 TON) (101 TON) 8753800 33E Old Tarbuo 357509 Old Tarbox0.88 42 Prestress. Conc. Conc. Abutment w/ 2005NO NO NO NO 1.84 3.07 STD. 422/15 89.98 Rd. Slab steel piles (66 TON) (I 11 TON) 8753800 38E Andrews 352909 Stww Creek 3.78 24 Conc. 3 -sided Box Conc. Spread NO NO NO (57 STD. 4/15/15 91.14 Creek Rd. Culvert Footing :1114 INO INO 11.23 11.60 (44 TON) TON) Page 2 of 2 Jefferson County Public Works Master Bridge List West Jefferson County Last UKtateA, 11/1/7817 Page 1 of 2 N Y1 W O tj j (. W BRIDGE TYPE F eC t Z F, r- d E' = C t� _1 c m OC F U of O CS 2 6.4 0C O „ Z F it Y ! ti ac99 _ = f < < x , 5 U _ o i `rt < '- -c O O z 2 e 99R u Superstructure Substructure 8451600 01W Pletcher 911607 Quinault S. 3.19 78 Prestress. Cone. Cone. Abutment w/ 1974 NO NO NO NO NO 0.98 1.64 STD. 5/10/16 99.50 Creek Shure Rd. Bulb -T Girder C.I.P. cone. pile (35 TON) (58 TON) 8258500 02W Barlow 134309 Oil City Rd. 9.75 64 Prestress. Cone. Slab Cone. Abutment w/ 2005 NO NO NO NO 1.53 1.99 STD. 5/10/16 83.53 C.I.P. Cone. Pile INO (69 TON) (115 TON) 8145800 03W Anderson 134309 Oil City Rd. 4.44 87 Prestress. Cone. Cone. Abutment w/ 1974 NO NO NO NO NO 0.91 1.52 STD. 5/10/16 90.43 Creek Bulb -T Girder C.I.P. cone. pile j (32 TON) (54 TON) 8280100 04W Hell Roaring 914207 Upper Iloh 0.16 120 Prestress. Cone. Cone. Abutment w/ 1982 NO NO NO NO 1.31 2.19 STD. 5/10/16 91.88 Creek Rd. Girder steel H pile INO (47 TON) (78 TON) 8298800 05W Alder Creek 914207 Upper Hoh 2.07 67 Prestress. Cone. Cone. Abutment w/ 1972 NO NO NO NOL11 1.85 STD. 5/10/16 99.59 Rd. Bulb -T Girder C.I.P. cone. pile INO 1(40 TON) 1(66 TON) 3383600 06W Rock Creek 914207 Upper Hoh 6.49 83 Prestress. Cone. Cone. Abutment w/ 1973 NO NO NO NO NO 1.13 1.89 STD. 5/11/16 92.80 Rd. Bulb -T Girder 1 C.I.P. cont, pile (40 TON) (67 TON) 8384000 07W Tower Creek 914207 Upper Hoh 7.5 71 Prestress. Cone. Cone. Abutment w/ 1973 NO NO NO 1.10 1.64 STD. 5/11/16 92.80 Rd. Bulb -T Girder C.I.P. cone. pile INO INO (39 TON) (66 TON) 8391000 08W Queets River 107509Clearwater 0.6 844 Steel Plate Girder, Cone. Piers, Cone. 1988 NO NO NO NO 1.07 1.79 UBIT 7/24/14 98.71 UBIT EVERY 4 YEARS -- Rd. C.I.P. cone. deck Abutment w/ steel H jNO (38 TON) j (64 TON) LAST UBIT 7/10/2012 pile 8047800 09W Hemphill 146809 Dowans 2.3 31 Timber Deck, Timber abutment, 1977 NO NO NO NO 21 TON 31 TON STD. 5/11/16 60.39 Creek Creek Rd. Timber Girders timber piles INO 7%6600 IOW Dowans 146809 Dowans 0.52 81 Prestress. Cone, Cone. Abutment w/ 1974 NO NO 1.10 STD. 511111 93.79 Creek Creek Rd. Bulb -T Girder C.I.P. cone. pile INO INO INO (39 TON) 11.84 (66 TON) Page 1 of 2 Jefferson County Public Works Master Bridge List West Jefferson County Last Undated. 11/1/2617 z m m O 2 G F °L BRIDGE TYPE V ti Z z Z 4✓ m e 2 E U Y c < +t Z p s W P < < " m 8 6.i O < p eC p ac � Z Superstructure Substructure 8475700 11 W Owl Creek 135109 Maple 1.29 69 Prestress. Cone. Slab Cone. Abutment w/ 1989 NO NO NO NO NO 1.36 2.27 5/10116 83.45 Creek Rd. steel H piles (49 TON) (81 TON) n FO 8253600 13W Hurst Creek 107509 Clearwater 2.66 67 Prestress. Cone. Cone. Abutment, 1969 NO NO NO NO 1.03 1.72 STD. 5/10/16 98.86 Rd. Bulb -T Girder Cone, column, Cone. INO (37 TON) (61 TON) footing 8339400 11W Willoughby 914207 Upper 11oh 3.52 60 Prestress. Cone. Cone. Pile cap w/ 1962 NO NO NO NO 0.62 STD. 5/11116 59.03 Creek Rd. Bulb -T Girder Prestress. Cone. piles INO (29 TON) 11.37 (49 TON) 8659900 30W Cassel Creek 134309 Oil City Rd. 3.59 154 Steel Girder Cone. Pile cap, steel 2000 YES NO NO NO NO L19 2.00 UBIT 711/14 72.52 Fracture Critiud SP.W Inspection - piles (43 TON) (72 TON) FO WSWT performs mspation-th UGIT bi-aasually 8829800 34W Pole Creek 914207 Upper Hoh 8.3 37 Cone. 3 -sided Box Cone. Spread 2010 NO NO NO NO 1.11 1.44 STD. 5/I 1/l6 92.80 Rd. Culvert Footing IND (50 TON) (65 TON) 8845600 35W Dismal Creek 914207 Upper Hoh 9.19 22 Cone. 3 -sided Box Cone. Spread 2011 NO NO NO NO 1 1.3 STD. 5/11/16 91.00 Rd. Culvert Footing IND (36 TON) (46 TON) 1 8853500 36W Spruce Creek 914207 Upper lloh 9.7 22 Conc. 3 -sided Box Cone. Spread 2012 NO NO NO NO NO 1.176 1.465 STD. 5/11/1 92.80 Rd. Culvert Footing (42 TON) (52 TON) 8863300 37W Alder Creek 914207 Upper Hoh 2.15 25 Conc. 3 -sided Box Conc. Spread 2013 NO NO NO 1.00 1.29 STD. 5/10/16 91.11 Tributary Rd. Culvert Footing IND IND (36 TON) (46 TON) 8886600 39W Upper Hoh 914207 Upper Hoh 6.95 21 Conc. 3 -sided Box Conc. Spread 2016 NO NO NO NO 1.65 2.13STD. 10!12116 82.69 I Rd. MP 6.95 Rd. Culvert Footing INO (59 TON) (76 TON) Page 2 of 2 APPENDIX B ,WSDOT - Bridges and Structures - Ratings \, washkiete1 UM* M, Deparlimmd of Transportatim Bridge Ratings The safety of bridge structures in Washington State is ensured through a meticulous inspection system. All public bridge owners, such as WSDOT, Counties and Cities, follow the same bridge inspection procedures. The condition rating of all bridge decks, superstructures and substructures and other elements based on these inspections. USDOT's Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requires all public bridge owners (state, city, and county ) to inspect and their bridges and report information including bridge condition ratings as part of their requirements in the National Bridge Inventory Standards (NBIS). Important aspects of the NBIS were: All states must perform periodic inspections of bridges greater than 20 feet in span on at least a biennial basis. SR6 Wiliapa River bridge Page l of 2 SR20 Deception Pass Bridge 2. Data collection was standardized and must be reported to FHWA. 3. Qualifications for inspection personnel were defined. 4. Training programs were developed and implemented. S. The Bridge Replacement Program (BRP) was established to provide funding for bridge replacement on the system. Structurally Deficient Structurally deficient means that a bridge requires repair or replacement of a certain component. This may include cracked or spalled concrete, the bridge deck, the support structure, or the entire bridge itself. If the condition is such that it no longer is able to carry its intended traffic loads it may be weight restricted. Being structurally deficient does not imply that the bridge is in danger of collapse or unsafe to the traveling public. If a bridge is open then it is considered safe. A bridge is classified as "Structurally Deficient" when bridge inspectors give either the superstructure, deck, and/or substructure a rating of four or less on a scale of zero to nine. WSDOT's poor condition category uses the same data, criteria, and rating scale. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Bridge/Reporting/BridgeRatings.htm 8/14/2015 WSDOT - Bridges and Structures - Ratings WSDOT has t37 state owned bridges that are classified as structurally deficient as of ]an. 2015. A list of these bridges is available in pdf and web page and map format. Functionally Obsolete Functional obsolescence is assessed by comparing the existing design of each bridge to current standards. A bridge can be categorized functionally obsolete a number of ways including: substandard bridge widths, low vertical clearance that can lead to repeated damage from over height trucks, load -carrying capacity, or flood potential. There are 866 WSDOT bridqes that are rated "Functionally Obsolete" Good, Fair, Poor Condition Rating Page 2 oPZ Interstate 82 Columbia River bridge near Umatilla Good: A range from no problems to some minor deterioration of structural elements Fair: All primary structural elements are sound but may have deficiencies such as minor section loss, deterioration, cracking, spalling, or scour. Poor: Advanced deficiencies such as section loss, deterioration, cracking, spalling, scour, or seriously affected primary structural components. Bridges rated in poor condition may be posted with truck weight restrictions. A summary of the WSDOT bridge network conditions is available in the 2014 Bridge Annual Report in the Gray notebook. Copyright WSDOT © 2015 http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Bridge,/Reporting/BridgeRatings.htm 8/14/2015 Bridge inspection Definitions What are "general condition ratings?" According to the National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS), condition ratings are used to describe an existing bridge or culvert compared with its condition if it were new. The ratings are based on the materials, physical condition of the deck (riding surface), the superstructure (supports immediately beneath the driving surface) and the substructures (foundation and supporting posts and piers). General condition ratings range from 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent). For detailed definitions, click here. Which bridges are included in the NBI system? NBI structures are bridges or culverts that carry vehicular traffic and have an opening longer than 20 feet measured along the center of the roadway. What bridges are not considered part of the NBI system? Non-NBI structures include bridges or culverts that carry vehicular traffic and are equal to or less than 20 feet measured along the center of the roadway. VDOT exceeds the NBI standards by inspecting and documenting in our inventory all bridges regardless of their length and all culverts having an opening greater than 36 square feet. What is a "structurally deficient" bridge? Bridges are considered structurally deficient if they have been restricted to light vehicles, closed to traffic or require rehabilitation. Structurally deficient means there are elements of the bridge that need to be monitored and/or repaired. The fact that a bridge is "structurally deficient" does not imply that it is likely to collapse or that it is unsafe. It means the bridge must be monitored, inspected and maintained. How is "structural deficiency" determined? The condition of different parts of a bridge is rated on a scale of 0 to 9 (with 9 being "excellent' and zero being "failed"). A structurally deficient bridge is one for which the deck (riding surface), the superstructure (supports immediately beneath the driving surface) or the substructure (foundation and supporting posts and piers) are rated in condition 4 or less. What makes a bridge structurally deficient, and are structural deficient bridges unsafe? The fact that a bridge is "structurally deficient" does not imply that it is likely to collapse or that it is unsafe. A "deficient" bridge is one with some maintenance concerns that do not pose a safety risk. A "deficient' bridge typically requires maintenance and repair and eventual rehabilitation or replacement to address deficiencies. To remain open to traffic, structurally deficient bridges are often posted with reduced weight limits that restrict the gross weight of vehicles using the bridges. If unsafe conditions are identified during a physical inspection, the structure must be closed. What is a "functionally obsolete" bridge? A functionally obsolete bridge is one that was built to standards that are not used today. These bridges are not automatically rated as structurally deficient, nor are they inherently unsafe. Functionally obsolete bridges are those that do not have adequate lane widths, shoulder widths, or vertical clearances to serve current traffic demand, or those that may be occasionally flooded. A functionally obsolete bridge is similar to an older house. A house built in 1950 might be perfectly acceptable to live in, but it does not meet all of today's building codes. Yet, when it comes time to consider upgrading that house or making improvements, the owner must look at ways to bring the structure up to current standards. What is a "fracture -critical" bridge? A fracture -critical bridge is one that does not contain redundant supporting elements. This means that if those key supports fail, the bridge would be in danger of collapse. This does not mean the bridge is inherently unsafe, only that there is a lack of redundancy in its design. What is a bridge's "sufficiency rating?" Sufficiency ratings were developed by the Federal Highway Administration to serve as a prioritization tool to allocate funds. The rating varies from 0 percent (poor) to 100 percent (very good). The formula considers structural adequacy, whether the bridge is functionally obsolete and level of service provided to the public. History of Federal Bridge Inspection Program The federal bridge inspection program regulations were developed as a result of the Federal -Aid Highway Act of 1968 following the collapse of the Silver Bridge in Point Pleasant, West Virginia. The United States Secretary of Transportation established the National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS) to locate and evaluate existing bridge deficiencies to ensure the safety of the traveling public. The 1968 Federal -Aid Highway Act directed the states to maintain an inventory of federal -aid highway system bridges. This was amended over time to establish criteria for NBIS bridges including: • Defining the NBIS to bridges to those on the federal -aid highway system • Requiring inspections of bridges longer than 20 feet on all public roads • Expanding bridge inspection programs to include special inspection procedures for fracture - critical members and underwater inspection Bridge andition Code key Code Description N NOT APPLICABLE 9 EXCELLENT CONDITION 8 VERY GOOD CONDITION No problems noted. 7 GOOD CONDITION Some minor problems. 6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION Structural elements show some minor deterioration. 5 FAIR CONDITION All primary structural elements are sound but may have some minor section loss (due to corrosion), cracking, spalling (deterioration of concrete surface) or scour (erosion of soil) 4 POOR CONDITION Advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour. SERIOUS CONDITION Loss of section, deterioration, spalling or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present. CRITICAL CONDITION Advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the bridge until corrective action is taken. "IMMINENT" FAILURE CONDITION Major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Bridge is closed to traffic but corrective action may put back in light service. C FAILED CONDITION Out of service - beyond corrective action.