HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Agenda Packet 05-09-2018Jefferson County Planning Commission
MEETING AGENDA Tri-Area Community Center May 9, 2018
P: 360-379-4450 621 Sheridan St. F: 360-379-4451 Port Townsend WA 98368 plancomm@co.jefferson.wa.us
5:30pm Opening Business
• Call to Order/Roll Call
• Approval of Agenda
• Commissioner Announcements
• Director’s Updates, if available 5:45pm Observer Comment
See Observer Comment Conduct, below.
6:15pm Discussion
• Review final business from May 2nd deliberation on policies
• Review and accept proposed changes to Unified Development Code (UDC)
o Refer to Exhibit 3 UDC Changes, p.8 of the Staff Report Attachment A: SEPA
Addendum distributed with the Comprehensive Plan documents
• Develop required findings and compose recommendation transmittal letter for
Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) 7:15pm Closing Business
• Summary of today’s meeting
• Follow-up action items
7:30pm Adjournment
• Thank you for coming and participating in your government at work! Observer Comment Conduct: When the Chair recognizes you to speak, please begin by stating your name
and address. Please be aware that the observer comment period is …
1) An optional time period dedicated to listening to the
public, not a question and answer session. The Planning
Commission is not required to provide response;
2) Offered at the Chair’s discretion when there is time;
3) Not a public hearing – comments made during this time
will not be part of any hearing record;
4) May be structured with a three-minute per person time
limit.
1
Jefferson County
Comprehensive Plan Update 2038
SEPA Addendum to 1998 Draft and Final Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan
Environmental Impact Statements and subsequent Supplemental EISs and Addenda
Table of Contents
Proposal Description ............................................................................................................................. 1
Addendum .......................................................................................................................................... 17
Signature ..................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
Proposal Description
PERIODIC UPDATE
Under the Growth Management Act (GMA), every eight years approximately each county and city must
review and revise its comprehensive land use plan and development regulations including its population
allocation and critical areas ordinances. (RCW 36.70A.130 (1)(a))
Jefferson County’s deadline for completion was June 30, 2016, but RCW 36.70A.130 (6)(e) allows a
two-year extension for slow-growing communities. Thus, Jefferson County’s timeline is extended to June
30, 2018.
In addition to complying with the Growth Management Act, the County must consider the long-term
environmental consequences of adopting plans and regulations through a non-project evaluation under
the State Environmental Policy Act. This document provides an addendum to the County’s past
environmental review record on its Comprehensive Plan Update.
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
Over the last four years, and particularly during 2016, the County reached out to the community through
online events, meetings, and activities. The County collected over 603 ideas/suggestions/comments. In
2017, the Jefferson County Planning Commission reviewed community input and worked on a refreshed
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 2
vision statement and reviewed draft streamlined goals and policies. In 2018, the County has begun a
final phase of public review through the legislative process with the Planning Commission and Board of
County Commissioners including public open houses and hearings.
ELEMENT UPDATES
A comprehensive plan is required to contain at least the following elements: land use, rural, housing,
transportation, capital facilities, utilities, and when the state provides funding, parks, and economic
development. The County is retaining its future land use plan and zoning but updating its plan vision
statement, element inventories, and goals and policies. The County is reorganizing its plan elements to
integrate similar topics and to streamline the document.
Exhibit 1. Comprehensive Plan Organization
Current Plan Elements Proposed Plan Reorganization
Element 1--Introduction
Element 2--Urban Growth Area
Element 3--Land Use and Rural Element
Element 4--Natural Resource Conservation
Element 5--Housing
Element 6--Open Space, Parks & Rec, Historic
Preservation
Element 7--Economic Development
Element 8--Environment
Element 9--Essential Public Facilities
Element 10--Transportation
Element 11--Utilities
Element 12--Capital Facilities
Plan Foundation
Element 1 -- Land Use
Element 2 -- Natural Resources
Element 3 -- Housing
Element 4 -- Open Space, Parks & Recreation,
Historical & Cultural Preservation
Element 5 -- Environment
Element 6 -- Transportation
Element 7 -- Economic Development
Element 8 -- Capital Facilities, Essential Public
Facilities, Utilities (Short Title: Capital Facilities and
Utilities)
Source: Jefferson County 2018
By each element topic, updated policies are described. Full plan drafts are available at the Jefferson
County project website: http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/578/Jefferson-County-Comprehensive-Plan.
Across all elements the County conducted a “total fitness review” of goals and policies, identifying goals
and policies that should be:
Retained – it's still valid, relevant, feasible, achievable, cost-effective.
Deleted – has been codified, combined with another goal or policy, no longer relevant, etc.
Moved – more appropriate somewhere else, different goal, element, etc.
Consolidated – with another goal or policy.
Revised – re-write to be more accurate, concise, or up to date, or include input.
Added – to reflect new information, law, or the needs of the public.
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 3
Many policies were deleted if they were already implemented in the code, and many were consolidated
and revised but concepts retained.
The Planning Commission reviewed each element’s total fitness review in 2017. The County and
consultants reviewed the results of the review and the State Department of Commerce’s Periodic Update
Checklist and identified other potential updates.
Plan Foundation
Formerly the Introduction, the Comprehensive Plan “Plan Foundation” chapter contains a new Vision
Statement and Framework Goals that respond to the Periodic Update public participation efforts and
current plan objectives. The text is updated to update the County’s planning history. This chapter is
supported by an appendix describing public participation efforts.
Land Use Element
The updated Land Use Element combines the County’s Land Use and Rural Element with the Urban Growth
Area Element. The Element is organized into four components: framework, rural, resource, and urban.
Framework: This section includes the County’s 20-year population allocations for the year 2038
consistent with Resolution #38-15.
The unified Future Land Use and Zoning map is included along with plan designation descriptions. One
overlay designation would be removed – the Forest Transition Overlay, which has been identified in plan
text but has not been applied on the map. No substantive changes to the Future Land Use and Zoning
Map would be made.
New land use goals and policies that are applicable to both rural and urban areas address:
Internal consistency between the Land Use Element and other Elements.
Examining new rural economic development and housing opportunities along selected regions of
existing highway/commuter corridors.
Low impact development and green building and infrastructure standards.
Land use compatibility with Naval Base Kitsap Indian Island installation consistent with a Joint Land
Use Study conducted in the last several years.
Supporting community planning updates when staffing capacity allows.
Developing information and action plans regarding impacts to land use from climate change.
Access to healthy foods and active lifestyles.
Rural: This section adds an explanation of Rural character. Updated policies include:
Retaining a policy promoting adequate rural zoned land and allowing rezones, while protecting
rural character and avoiding sprawl, and adding a provision that there be consideration of vacant
lot supply of the local area before allowing site-specific changes to residential zoning.
Policy to create a process and definitions for lots of record.
Periodic review of limited area of more intensive rural development (LAMIRD) related to Rural
Village Centers and mixed uses.
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 4
Adding policy encouraging integration of infrastructure and economic development planning for
Rural Village Centers.
Amending prior detailed policies that have been codified for Crossroads and simplifying to general
intent and LAMIRD requirements.
Adding policy about maintenance of open space / greenbelts in master planned resorts.
Encouraging renewable energy power systems and alternative wastewater system to minimize
infrastructure costs and reduce environmental impacts.
Policy supporting planning of Glen Cove Light Industrial/Commercial District with the City of Port
Townsend.
Policies addressing compatibility, use, and success of home-based businesses and cottage industries
Resource: This summarizes the Natural Resources designated lands of long-term commercial significance
and addresses general woodland conservation.
Urban: Adds in updated Urban Growth Area (UGA) land capacity analysis. Shortens technical analysis
and places it into an appendix. Adds policies on:
Healthy active living.
Incentives for housing development.
Alternative wastewater treatment.
Identification and protection of open space corridors including innovative techniques like transfer of
development rights and gross density approaches.
Natural Resources
Background mapping is updated for natural resource lands particularly for mineral lands. Policy edits
would:
Promote regular review of resource lands.
Supporting innovative techniques and accessory uses to support agriculture.
Potential mineral lands protection policies for properties that are mapped with good or fair
resources but not yet in mineral resource lands overlay.
Supporting Firewise and similar programs as part of any educational or management effort.
Promoting community forestry, where small forest land owners are assisted in properly managing
their forests for conservation and economic development.
Encouraging state and other educational and management assistance providers to help forest land
owners manage their property.
Promoting the use and experimentation of new forest management practices through the Natural
Resource Center facility in Forks.
Endorsing use of Forest Management Plans and the planting of a diversity of native trees that are
resistant to laminated root rot.
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 5
Considering collaborations with Jefferson County Conservation District and other educational
institutions, to assess likely impacts of climate change on agriculture, and to develop mitigation and
adaptation strategies.
Housing
The Housing Element inventory has been updated to present more recent trends and conditions regarding
the lack of affordable housing. Policies are amended to:
Promote accessory dwelling units,
Address housing barriers,
Evaluate short-term rentals,
Allow alternative wastewater systems in UGAs,
Develop incentives for housing in UGAs and rural areas, and
Support housing rehabilitation programs in rural areas.
Open Space, Parks & Recreation, Historic & Cultural Preservation
In this element, the inventory is amended to incorporate the information in the 2015 Parks, Recreation,
and Open Space (PROS) Plan Update. Active healthy living is addressed. Goals and policies are
amended as part of the “total fitness review” to add in goals and policies from the PROS Plan Update
and to reference tribal involvement in the identification and evaluation of cultural resources.
Environment Element
This Element addresses updates to watershed planning and water resources in areas where private wells
may be a water source given legislative direction in response to the Hirst decision. This Element also adds
information on climate change and the County and City climate action planning efforts. Air quality, noise,
and night sky clarity are also addressed in the Element background. Critical area maps are refreshed
based on County code definitions and federal, state and county mapping layers. Some of the goals and
policies on surface water in the current Land Use Element are moved to this Environment Element. Goals
and policies are updated to:
Address watershed planning effort and reserve water quantities.
Incorporate by reference the Shoreline Master Program.
Address climate change with policies from the Climate Action Group and TP Lab Group’s 2016
comments on the Comprehensive Plan Update.
Mitigate air quality and odor.
Promote conservation practices that support natural plant communities and site-specific resource
concerns.
Support view protection, and limiting impacts of outdoor lighting,
Reduce noise,
Reference stormwater management manuals,
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 6
Allow alternative conservation and protection standards in fish and wildlife habitat conservation
areas and wetlands areas per the Jefferson County Conservation District or other examples,
Promote inter-agency cooperation to improve environmental permit processing,
Allow mitigation banks and in-lieu fee programs for watershed based mitigation, and
Promote multi-agency efforts to conserve wetlands.
Transportation Element
Technical analysis is updated in the element regarding current and future conditions if growth occurs by
2038; because growth and land use is consistent with past County planning efforts, results are similar. The
Element is supported by a Transportation Technical Appendix. Policy updates are largely based on the
“total fitness review” with the following highlights of new or revised policies:
Revise public transportation goal to promote a reliable safe, cost-effective, and energy efficient
system.
Encourage public transportation agencies to use technology based software to improve coordination.
Encourage electric and autonomous vehicle sharing programs including a network of electric changing
stations.
Support the update of the Non-Motorized Transportation and Recreational Trails Plan.
Promote multimodal transportation in the UGA.
Provide adequate and appropriate signage to promote safe and effective multimodal
transportation.
Evaluate all transportation, plans and projects for opportunities to adapt and mitigate the effects of
climate change.
Support expanded use of electric-assist bicycles, including safe and effective siting of E-bicycle
charging stations.
Economic Development Element
The Element includes updated information on economic trends, and activities of partners in economic
development in the County (e.g. Team Jefferson, Port, etc.). New and amended policies address:
Working in collaboration with other partners (described above).
Pursuing grant funding and other forms of support from state and federal agencies to plan for
economic development.
Examining new rural job growth and economic development along highway and tourist corridors.
Supporting a business-friendly environment.
Encouraging collaboration with Tribal Governments.
Addressing working waterfront and small marine activities in several urban, rural economic, and
resort areas.
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 7
Supporting installation of the sewer system in the Port Hadlock UGA.
Consider re-zoning Port of Port Townsend residentially zoned property (Quilcene Marina) to
Essential Public Facilities, or to a new Public Purpose zone.
Supporting use of non-fossil based renewable energy.
Creating a local food system.
Capital Facilities and Utilities
This element combines the Capital Facilities, Essential Public Facilities, and Utilities Elements. It is supported
by a Capital Facilities Plan Technical Appendix. Inventory information is amended.
Capital facilities level of service policies are amended based on system plans and evaluations of
growth and funding implications. There is added policy support for installing sewer in UGAs.
Reference is added to implementing the prioritized organics recommendations contained in the
Jefferson County Solid Waste Management Plan.
Essential public facility goals and policies are amended to update information regarding the
Jefferson County International Airport Master Plan Update 2014.
Utilities polices are updated to support new fiber optic cable installation, renewable energy source
installation, and energy conservation implementation.
UDC AMENDMENTS
Consistent with Growth Management Act provisions to update development regulations together with the
Comprehensive Plan, Jefferson County is proposing to amend its Unified Development Code (UDC) to
improve its clarity and usability and to implement some of the amended policies of the Comprehensive
Plan Update. To develop the update, County staff evaluated whether the changes were
maintenance/housekeeping items, items to enhance usability or understanding, or items needing
deliberation. See Exhibit 2.
Exhibit 2. Potential Jefferson County Code Changes by Type
Type of Code Change Number
M = Maintenance to update references or correct scrivener errors 92
S = Suggested change enhancing usability, applicability, or
understanding of code
28
D = Deliberation 35
DC = Deliberation required for Comprehensive Plan Consistency 3
DD = Deliberation Deferred to Future Docket 5
Total 163
Source: Jefferson County 2018
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 8
The County intends to phase in UDC changes. Concurrent with the Comprehensive Plan Update,
maintenance (M) and suggested changes for usability(S) are proposed as well as limited deliberation (D)
items. See Exhibit 2. Numbering is based on a staff list of change items, used here for convenience. Most
deliberation items (D, DC, and DD) would be considered at a later date, and are not listed below.
Exhibit 3. Unified Development Code (UDC) Changes Proposed Concurrent with Comprehensive Plan
Update[LG1]
Item Type of
Change
Code Section Description
2 M 15.15.080 (2) Flood Damage Prevention. Provisions for flood hazard
reduction. Eliminate second sentence: "Additional
standards were clarified in FEMA Technical Bulletin 11-01
to allow crawlspace construction for buildings located in
the special flood hazard areas...however increased
insurance premiums by 20 percent "
3 M 18.05.080 Hearing Examiner qualifications to be specified. "The
hearing examiner shall have seven years' experience as
an attorney with land use experience, or seven years'
experience in a land use related field, or some
combination of both which would qualify as seven years'
necessary training and experience to conduct
administrative or quasi-judicial hearings on land use
regulatory matters."
4 M 18.05.090 Table 1-1 *Correct abbreviation for Urban Low Density Residential
*Add Urban Public district to UGA
*Change Resource-based Industrial from RI to RBI for
consistency
*Remove Environmentally Sensitive Areas as an overlay
designation
*Add Airport Overlay III
*Change text from ESA to Critical Areas
*Remove text 'administrator will do site visits before
requiring special reports'
5 M 18.10.010 Align Affordable Housing definition with RCW
43.185b.010 & County Resolution 112-94 (CWPP 6.1).
See also note to 18.15.520(4)(f) in Code Publishing
report.
6 M 18.10.030 Remove ESA definition, added Critical Area definition
7 M 18.10.090 Provide consistency for definitions of Hobby Kennels and
Commercial Kennels between JCC Title 6 and 18. (i.e.
"two litters of cats or dogs per year…and does not meet
definition of Commercial Kennel at JCC 6.07.020.").
Add definition for Commercial Kennel to 18.10.030.
8 M 18.10.030 Add definition for “Cumulative Effects of similar actions in
the area” as used in 18.15.610. See 18.25.100(3)(aa),
and discussion on review page 8.
9 M 18.10.190 Add definition of “silviculture” used in JCC 18.20.330
10 M 18.10 Add definition for “Standing”
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 9
Item Type of
Change
Code Section Description
11 M 18.10.010 DELETED -- Combined w/ 5
12 M 18.10.030 Define calendar days.
13 S 18.10.060 Provide more detailed definition of "Family" to
accommodate a variety of living arrangements, such as
for housing affordability.
14 M 18.10.150 Create consistency with ORD 01-0106-14 (Conservation
Futures) and RCW 84.34.020 for definition of "Open
space land".
15 M 18.10.180 Omit liquid petroleum (propane) from Regulated
Substance as it relates to Above Ground and
Underground storage tanks. This would take regulation
of propane tanks out of the classification of "Regulated
substance" in WAC 173-360-120.
16 M 18.15.185 thru .400 Update old references to Environmentally Sensitive Areas
[Critical Areas], which used to be treated as Land Use
Overlays in 18.15, Article VI-D through Article VI-J.
Many edits to update the reference to Chapter 18.22
Critical Areas will be identified in the code text itself, and
not replicated here.
20 S 18.15.030 Add new subsection (4) for "Public" as denoted in 18.05
Table 1-1, for areas zoned pubic but are not Parks,
Preserves & Recreation.
23 M 18.15.040 Table 3-1 Fix awkward adjective "recreational" reference in
"Marijuana recreational producer", "Marijuana
recreational processor", "Marijuana recreational retailer".
Remove altogether or write as "Marijuana producer
(recreational)". Performance standards are awkwardly in
alphabetized list under "Recreational" at 18.20.295.
Move to "M".
25 M 18.15.040 p. 18-47, Note 6. Land Use District list: category under
Rural Industrial is misidentified, change "RI - Resource
Industrial" to "RBI - Resource-Based Industrial" to comport
with land use descriptions at 18.15.015 (3)(c) describing
RBI.
28 M 18.15.110 Add proper citation for CWPP #4. (Jefferson County
Resolution No. 112-94).
29 M 18.15.110 Switch "18.15.110 Special use permit--Siting of essential
public facilities" to "18.15.110 Siting of essential public
facilities--special use permit". The section is written to
address Essential Public Facilities siting requirements, not
to address what type of permit or review process it is.
Also change table of contents on p. 18-40.
18.40.040 Table 8-1 Type V column, change "Special
Use Permits under JCC 18.15.110" to "Siting Essential
Public Facilities under JCC 18.15.110".
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 10
Item Type of
Change
Code Section Description
30 M 18.15.1124 Clarify standards used for FAA regulations with document
cite.
31 M 18.15.1132 Ground transportation facilities—provide regulation cite.
32 M 18.15.115 Strike "The only existing officially designated master
planned resort in the county is the Port Ludlow MPR,"
33 M 18.15.150 (2)(a) "The facility cannot otherwise be suitability [change to
suitably] located on undesignated land;"
35 M 18.15.160 Strike "except as provided for ESAs in JCC 18.15.165."
36 M 18.15.170 (6) Change "pursuant to Article VI-H and VI-I" to "pursuant to
Chapter 18.22 JCC"
37 M 18.15.185 Edit notes under Article VI-D Environmentally Sensitive
Areas District
38 M 18.15.225 Amend references to the appellant examiner for the
Reasonable Economic Use Variance process.
39 M JCC 18.15.255 JCC 18.15.255 (3)(a) references an outdated portion of
the On-site Sewage Code and should reference WAC
246-272-22501.
42 M 18.15.520 PRRDs—affordable housing definition at 18.15.520(4)(f).
Change "36 percent gross income" to "30 percent gross
income", reference RCW 43.185B.010 and CWPP 6.1
added definition per Co. Res. No. 112-94.
+Correct low income "hosing" to low income "housing".
+Also changed in 18.10.010.
43 M 18.15.525 (2)(b) Change "Articles VI-D through VI-J of this chapter" to
Chapter 18.22 JCC.
44 M 18.15.530 (2)(b) Change reference of Article VI-F to Ch. 18.22 JCC
46 M 18.15.571 (6)(d) Change reference of Article VI-D and VI-J to appropriate
Ch. 18.22 JCC references.
47 M 18.15.572 Review awkward construction between 18.15.470
"Article VI-L Remote Rural Overlay Districts for the West
End Planning Area and the Brinnon Planning Area" and
18.15.572 "Article VI-O Small-Scale Recreation and
Tourist (SRT) Overlay District" -- which is referring only to
Brinnon Subarea Plan. Rename Article VI-O to include
"Brinnon Subarea Plan" or address all SRT in one area.
See also Article VII -- Subarea Plans; 18.15.580 Brinnon
Subarea Plan.
49 M 18.15.610 (2)(b) Analyzing impacts of major industrial development--uses
term "cumulative effects" which should be defined.
50 M 18.15.610 (8)
18.15.610 (10)
Change references: ESA to Ch. 18.22 JCC.
51 M 18.15.635 Reauthorization of Article needed through Board’s
legislative action.
Refers to code provisions for Major Industrial
Developments (MID) -- requires public hearing and
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 11
Item Type of
Change
Code Section Description
reauthorization action. Review Growth Management Act
(GMA) amendments.
52 S 18.18 Code Interpretation 6/10/2009 explaining transitional
and urban zoning and lot combinations. Review
interpretation for possible code text that is more
expository.
58 M 18.18.060 (3) Need reference for County Stormwater Management
Plan.
59 S 18.18.100(2)(g) UGA sign regulations differ from 18.30.150(8)(d) and
may be impermissible restraint on speech.
Generally, need to review sign code across UDC for
compatibility between 18.18, 18.20 and 18.25. Review
for compliance with "strict scrutiny" standard.
60 M 18.18.100 (3)(a)(ii) Electronic readerboard signs in UGA. Add "and
residential districts for public purpose facilities" to update
from Ordinance 10-1117-14.
61 M 18.18.130 Update list of applicable development standards with
"18.19".
65 M 18.20.030 Change reference to performance standards in subsection
(2)(b)(vi)(C) (previously directed to non-existent location)
66 M 18.20.030
(3)(e)(ii)(B)(II)
Misreference. "Agricultural schools under this section which
also house students and/or faculty for the duration of the
course of study must meet the requirements of JCC
18.40.080 for a conditional use permit. Change to
18.40.490 [Article VIII--Conditional Uses]
67 M 18.20.030
(2)(b)(vi)(C)
Correct the citation given in JCC 18-20-030 (2)(b)(vi)( C )
"Facilities for breeding and raising dogs for show or sale
must be incidental and accessory to the principal farm
activities and meet all of the performance standards for
animal kennels and shelters at JCC 18.20.060 (3) --
remove subsection (3) [does not exist].
68 M 18.20.030(2)(b)(v)(C) Pond exemption from stormwater permit. Page 18-114.1
Refers to JCC 18.30.070(6) which does not exist.
Change to "18.30.060 (5)(b)(v)".
69 S 18.20.295 (4)(g) 18.20.295 (4) (g) – Recreational Marijuana: site
development standards require all have “Type A”
landscape screening from adjacent parcels. This is not
appropriate for retail. Add text here about
administrative options to adapt different performance
standards.
70 S 18.20.140 JCC 18.20.140 needs requirements for General
Institutional Uses.
71 M 18.20.150 (1)(c) Update RCW reference.
72 M 18.20.160 (5)(a)(ii)
18.20.160 (5)(c)
The text of JCC 18.20.160 (5)(a)(ii) needs to be modified
to show that DNR is no longer recording the moratoriums.
Jefferson County is sending out a request to the applicant
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 12
Item Type of
Change
Code Section Description
to record their moratorium and give a copy to DCD after
they have recorded their moratorium. Or, delete
requirement to record intent to not convert.
+Revise release of moratorium and add the one acre
provision 18.20.160 (5)(c) (assessor allows one-acre site
allowing to remain under forestry tax category.)
73 M 18.20.160 (5) The text of RCW 76.09.060 and JCC 18.20.160(5) are
conflicting. The text needs to be updated to coincide with
one another. [Forest Practices Act, conversion harvest and
development moratorium.]
76 M 18.20.182(9)(a) 18-114.15 References WAC 246-215-160 which is now
WAC 246-215-09150. [Health Department rule
regarding hand-washing station with Mobile Food Units.]
77 M 18.20.200 Include marijuana operation in prohibition list for home
businesses.
79 M 18.20.295 Update name of “Liquor and Cannabis Board”. Add
definitions for license and licensee.
81 M 18.20.295 (3)(b) Add USE in "Allowed as conditional discretionary (C(d))
use with a cottage industry permit…"
82 M 18.20.350(1) Page 18-114.25 Refers to overlay at 18.15.572 (Brinnon
Subarea Plan) but omits overlay at 18.15.470.
83 M 18.20.350(3) Page 18-114.26 Same as above—SRT overlay districts
also at 18.15.470.
84 M 18.20.350(3)(j)(v) “Cumulative effect” or “cumulative impact” undefined [use
definition from State references - RCW or WAC].
86 M 18.20.420 Delete reference that is now outdated. The requirement
to comply with the standards of the American Animal
Hospital Association should be removed since this body is
voluntary per the Hearing Examiner on MLA12-00276.
88 M 18.22.120 (5) Underground Propane Storage Tanks in CARAs—revise
to meet definition of “Regulated Substance” in WAC
173-360-120. 18.22.120 refers to Environmental Health
Title 08.10.305 (6)(a)(iv). Confer with WAC and EH
definitions. Update definitions in 18.10.080 "Hazardous
Substance" and "Hazardous Waste", if needed.
90 S 18.30.050 Add provision for use when two or more lots are used to
meet requirements of the code (added new 050(3)(c))
92 S 18.30.050 Table 6-1 *JCC 18.30.050 Table 6-1 at Minimum rear and Side
Setbacks...add footnote "20"
*Footnote 20. "If a development proposal depends on
two or more lots or parcels to be considered as one site
for purposes of complying with the provisions of this title
of any other provision of Jefferson County Code, the
department may require the applicant to record a
covenant to the benefit of the county that requires the
retention of the lots under common ownership and control
for the duration that the use is maintained on the site."
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 13
Item Type of
Change
Code Section Description
*Area of Impervious Surface Coverage. Change to
include pervious pavement in the calculation.
*Note 15 re: stormwater requirements on parcel < one
acre, show it's minimized, demonstrate house is
comparable to neighborhood (gross floor area).
93 M 18.30.060 (5)(b) Misreference. "All grading of 500 cubic yards or more
shall be subject to a stormwater management permit, as
specified in JCC 18.30.070 (6) [incorrect citation, should
be 18.30.070 (5).]
95 M 18.30.070 (5) Misreference in 18.30.070 Stormwater. "All grading of
500 cubic yards or more (not exempted under subsection
(5)(b) of this section)" change to "(not exempted under
18.30.060 (5)(b))…
96 M 18.30.070 (2) Add reference to stormwater exemption at 18.20.030
(2)(b)(iv)(D).
98 M 18.30.080(1)(o) JCC 18.30.080(1)(o) states that subdivision road names
shall be approved by the BOCC based on a
recommendation by Public Works. However, JCC 12.20
Emergency Locator System already addressed that topic.
99 M 18.30.100 Table 6-2 For cottage industries, correct the number of spaces
required for employees, and cross-reference back to the
parking standards for spaces required for customers.
100 M 18.30.100 (1)(b) ADA Parking standards and dimensions out of date. Fix
with an updated reference to ANSI or ADA standard.
Code references ANSI but then states "such spaces shall
be not less than 12 feet, six inches wide." Code doesn't
mention "car" vs. "van" space with a 60" access isle. Also,
new standards require a proportion of ADA spaces to be
Van with Access Isle. See specifications from US
Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Disability
Rights Section, ADA Design Guide.
www.ada.gov/restripe.htm.
101 S 148.30.100 Table 6-
3
Investigate parking stall size standards for compact
vehicles.
103 S 18.30.130 (8)(b) Pruned and trimmed as necessary—see Wuthrich v. King
County, No. 92555-5 and note for JCC 18.30.050.
104 M 18.30.130 (8)(d) Harmonize with UGA sign code at JCC 18.18.100.
106 M 18.30.150 (8)(d) Remove time limits for political signs. JCC 18.30.150
regarding time limits for political signs--Reed v. City of
Maguire U.S. Supreme Court applies strict scrutiny to any
regulation based on content. Remove the political time
limits so they are not regulated differently from real
estate signs, et cetera.
107 M 18.30.150 (6)(q)
18.30.150 (6)(r)
* (q) Replace "UGA" with "urban commercial".
*(r) need height standard referencing "urban residential"
zone too.
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 14
Item Type of
Change
Code Section Description
108 M 18.30.170 There may be a conflict in the code regarding parking.
One space per employee according to JCC 18.20.170
(4) (d). Any business requiring customers to visit the site
shall provide adequate on-site parking spaces, in
addition to one for each … [text truncated]
109 M 18.30.190 Noise. Update or cross-reference the noise standards
between the existing 18.30.190 and the new Chapter
8.70 "Noise Control" enacted by Ordinance No. 02-
0209-15, which addresses community nuisance noise.
112 M 18.35.060 (7) New subsection .060 (7) to Article II, Boundary Line
Adjustments, adding language governing Boundary Line
Agreements, in accordance with RCW 58.04.007.
113 M 18.35.070 Change reference in this subsection from ESA to critical
area. In the BLA requirements in the JCC, identify critical
areas on the submitted site plan.
115 M 18.35.080(5)
18.35.140(5)
18.35.310(3)
JCC 18.35.080(5) Refers to RCW 86.56.345- This should
be RCW 84.56.345 (Alteration of property lines -
Payment of taxes and assessments). Also change in
18.35.140 (5) & 18.35.310 (3).
116 M 18.35.120(3)(i) Changed references from ESA to critical area
117 M 18.35.400
18.35.410
Updated to reflect 2012 and 2013 Legislative
amendments to RCW 58.17.140 & 58.17.170 extending
the time limit on final long plat submittal, and extending
the time period after final plat approval under which the
plat approval is vested, in a manner parallel to the
extension of the time period for filing a final plat.
118 S 18.35.470 Make the condominium-ization – JCC 18.35.470 –
language clearer with consideration for possible effects
on ADU’s.
119 S 18.35.670 The plat alteration section (JCC 18.35.670) should
include final steps such as taxes being paid, number of
copies for final, signature blocks, etc.
120 M 18.35.670(1)(a) JCC 18.35.670(1)(a) reads "containing four or fewer
lots." It should say "resulting in 4 or fewer lots." The word
"containing" needs to be changed to "resulting in."
121 M 18.40.030 (5) Edit sentence "Project review conducted pursuant to…"
for clarity.
122 M 18.40.080(2) Typographic error: change 42.31C to “43.21C”
124 S 18.40.090 (2) Revise subsection 2 to provide UDC Administrator's
discretion when pre-application conferences are needed
and add uses needing preapplication conferences
(added industrial and commercial uses). This would also
cover the issue of not needing pre-application
conferences for Current Use Assessments.
125 M 18.40.100 (3)(c) Clarify: Chapter 58.16 RCW in 1937 "(now codified at
Chapter 58.17 RCW)".
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 15
Item Type of
Change
Code Section Description
126 M 18.40.110 For clarity, change section title from "18.40.110
Submission of acceptance of application determination of
completeness – Additional information and project
revision" to "18.40.110 Determination of complete
application – Additional information and project revision."
127 M 18.40.100(1)(e) Add requirement that fees be paid.
129 M 18.40.130 (2) Review text and revise for clarity. Looks like cut/paste
from RCW and not completely in context.
130 M 18.40.160 "The administrator shall issue a notice of application on
all Type II and Type III project permit applications. Add
"and Type I applications requiring SEPA review."
131 M 18.40.220 JCC 18.40.220 could be updated to reference e-mailing
comments.
132 M 18.40.220 (1) Changed the 14-day comment period on the Notice of
Application to 15 days when an open record predecision
hearing is, as required by RCW 36.70B.110 (3).
133 S 18.40.230 In first paragraph, change the provision to combine the
notice of application with threshold determination from
“may” to “shall” combine to conform with 18.40.780(1)(c)
Noticing timeframes in JCC 18.40.230 do not agree with
those specified in JCC 18.40.330(2)(b) and (3) - SEPA
notice cannot be combined for noticing as specified in
JCC 18.40.230 in case of SEPA appeal (due to SEPA
appeal noticing timeframes).
See also 18.40.780 (1)(c) which says threshold
determination and hearing notice "shall" be combined.
This creates a problem to couple the two, because the
hearing is noticed without allowing the appeal period to
run out, and any appeal would be omitted from the
hearing notice.
134 S 18.40.320(3) Eliminate requirement to post a Notice of Decision.
135 S 18.40.330(6) Added a new (6) explicitly eliminating certain SEPA
appeals.
136 M 18.40.350 Code Interpretations. "Code interpretations are not
subject to noticing provisions of 18.40 except to
Applicant/Appellant."
137 S 18.40.410 SPAAD. Purpose. "The purpose of this article is to allow
prospective buyers, owners or developers of land a
means to obtain advance determinations of the site
requirements and constraints to particular parcels without
undertaking the risk or expense of applying for a
“triggering” building or other development permit not
requiring Type II, III, or IV land use approval."
138 M 18.40.450 (4) "Approving the proposed site plan will "serve" [strike
serve] not be a detriment to the public use and interest."
139 D 18.40.460 1/31/2018 REPEALED SPAAD CODE ARTICLE VII (Site
Plan Advance Approval Determination) Duration of
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 16
Item Type of
Change
Code Section Description
Approval. Provide specific vesting time limit and
expiration process for SPAAD. Provide time limit for
initiating complete application and initiating construction.
140 S 18.40.520 (2)(b) Conditional Use Permits. Timing of administrative
determination whether the conditional use decision should
be referred to the Hearing Examiner: Change to be after
the public comment period, not "at time of determination
of application's completeness…" This includes the public
process in decision-making.
142 S 18.40.640 Code Interpretation: Administrative Road Setback
Variances shall be subject to Article IX, 18.40.640
Variance Types -- Review Process, as a distinct variance
in addition to other types of variances provided in the
code. Refer also to 18.30.050 Table 6-1 footnote #6,
"...the administrator may reduce the minimum road
setbacks if the strict application of such setback would
render a legal lot of record unbuildable under the
provisions of the code." 18.40.650(5) that condition is
not caused by applicant. Clarify that the application will
be evaluated under variance criteria. Ensure consistent
and equitable review for all applicants.
143 S 18.40.760(3)(a)(i) Add more detailed “cumulative impact” language
144 S 18.40.810 (8) Delete requirement to mail notice of appeal ten days
prior to hearing.
145 M 18.40.820 Use of “binding site plan" to implement Conditional Uses,
mixed use projects, and similar adaptations should use
Development Agreement under Article XI 18.40.820-860.
Binding Site Plan comes under RCW 58.17 for
subdivisions is wrong tool unless a new “binding site plan"
provision is created.
146 M 18.40.850(5) Revise to refer back to table 8-1 to avoid confusion.
147 S 18.40.030 Additional language to determine project review type.
149 M 18.40.530 Define vague terms in Approval of Conditional Uses—
“cumulative effect”, “similar actions”, “in the area”.
150 M 18.40.650 Review variance approval criteria, “cumulative impact”
language with other sections, & Shoreline Master
Program (SMP).
151 M 18.40.750 (1)(a) Correct reference by adding missing text: "Except as set
forth in subsection (1)(b) through (e) of this section…"
152 M 18.40.750 (1) Update WAC reference for (1)(b) through (1)(e) to point
to Table at WAC 197-11-800 (1)(d) for flexible
threshold limits.
153 M 18.42 Update per federal law changes
Address definitions and application content, to ensure
compliance with the new FCC rules.
155 S 18.45 18.45 does not make a clear distinction between an
annual amendment cycle and the periodic review. The
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 17
Item Type of
Change
Code Section Description
schedule for a periodic review simply refers to the annual
amendment cycle. A periodic review of the
Comprehensive Plan needs to allow DCD to establish a
work plan with its own schedule.
156 M 18.45.080 (2)(b) Incorrect reference made to JCC 18.40.310
[Reconsideration]. Should be 18.40.230 [Notice of Public
Hearing].
157 M 18.45.090 *(1). Change "processed concurrent with" to "processed
concurrently with"
*(1)(a). Change "planning commission" to "planning
agency" per reference to RCW 36.70.550.
*(4)(b). Change reference JCC 18.40.310 to 18.40.230.
158 S 18.50.060(6)
18.50.060
*Notice considered served three days after posting
*Enforcement: Notice and Order – service by mail,
change postmark date to “3 days after postmark”
159 S 18.50.110(1)(d)
18.50.110(4)
Civil and criminal penalties—when fines accrue, postmark
date to “3 days after postmark”. Correct
fine/imprisonment amounts/times for misdemeanor.
161 M 18.40.750 (3) Old planned action reference to 43.21C.031 (2)(a) which
was changed in 2012 (SESB 6406). Change to
43.21C.031 (2) and search for other changes made in
2012 SEPA revisions.
162 S Title 15 Adopt International Residential Code Appendix Q for
Tiny Home standards. Alternately adopt our own
modification of Appendix Q.
163 S 18.40.310 Reconsideration. Review Pierce County's code provisions.
5-day request time period and 10-day response period
is limiting.
164 S 18.30 Clarify meaning of no minimum lot size in Table 6-1, Ch.
18.30. Does not make small lots "noncomforming" in terms
of SMP.
Source: Jefferson County 2018
Addendum
PURPOSE
Jefferson County has prepared this Addendum in conformance with State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
rules at WAC 197-11-625 and -706, to evaluate and disclose potential environmental impacts and
mitigating measures associated with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Update and associated
Unified Development Code (UDC) Amendments, called the Proposal in this document.
This Addendum builds on the analysis contained in the prior Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) and
associated addenda, but does not significantly change the analysis, nor identify new or significantly
different impacts. The Addendum analysis indicates that the current Proposal will result in similar impacts
as alternatives studied in the prior EISs. Because the Proposal contains goals and development regulations
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 18
designed to assure compliance with the Jefferson County Code to reduce potential impacts to the natural
and built environment, no new impacts beyond those studied previously are anticipated.
DOCUMENT ADDENDED
This addendum provides supplemental information to the Jefferson County Final Environmental Impact
Statement (Final EIS), May 27, 1998, and to related SEPA documents in “documents adopted” below.
The 1998 Final EIS studied a range of growth alternatives, summarized below, and the current Proposal
retains the essential nature of the Preferred Alternative.
Focused Growth Alternative - This alternative seeks to direct growth into one urban growth area,
the City of Port Townsend. The rest of the County would be designated “rural” with a low-density
pattern of permitted uses reflecting the current developed densities.
Dispersed Growth Alternative - The approach of this alternative places a higher priority on the
GMA [Growth Management Act] goals to promote economic opportunity, and encourage the
availability of housing. A much large “urban” area would be designated, including the Port Ludlow
area, the TriArea (including the communities of Chimacum, Port Hadlock and Irondale) and the Glen
Cove area. The airport would also be included in the urban growth area to accommodate the Port
of Port Townsend’s economic development objectives for this facility. Rural densities would be less
restrictive than the focused growth alternative, especially in areas where current trends reflect a high
demand for development opportunities or in areas potentially attractive for future development.
Moderate Growth Alternative – This alternative seeks a balance between all of the GMA goals by
providing more opportunity for housing and economic development in additional urban areas, which
still significantly reducing urban sprawl and encouraging development to locate in areas where
necessary facilities can be readily provided. This alternative designates three UGAs: Port Townsend,
Port Ludlow, and the TriArea. As in the dispersed growth alternative, the TriArea includes an urban
growth area, but this area is much more limited, following the existing development pattern where it
approaches urban densities and character. Similarly, portions of the Glen Cove area are included in
the UGA, but the area is not as extensive as in the dispersed growth alternative. The remaining rural
areas are more limited in development capacity than the focused growth alternative, however, yet
are similar to the dispersed growth alternative, thereby allowing greater development opportunities
in these areas.
The Preferred Alternative – This alternative is very similar to the focused growth alternative. The
alternative acknowledges that the County will have one UGA, Port Townsend. However, the Draft
Plan does recommend that the County and City engage in analyses of the Glen Cove/TriArea to
determine how a portion or all of this area could be designated an urban growth area and the fiscal
and environmental impacts of such actions. The preferred alternative as implemented in the Revised
Draft Plan recommends that three “villages” of Port Hadlock, Quilcene, and Brinnon be designated
as Rural Village Centers. Port Ludlow, which was recommended for designation as a Rural Village
Center in the Draft Plan, has been designated a Master Planned Resort in the Revised Draft Plan
based on 1997 GMA amendments codified in RCW 36.70A.362. The commercial area of the
Master Planned Resort has been designated as a Village Commercial Center. In addition to the Rural
Village Centers, the Preferred Alternative also recommends the designation of eleven (11) Rural
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 19
Crossroads. Light Industrial and associated commercial uses in the Glen Cove area are contained by
a “tightline” boundary in the Revised Draft Plan, to preserve options during the TriArea/ Glen Cove
Special Study. The Revised Draft Plan also includes revisions from the Draft Plan to recognize
existing forest resource-based industrial activities at Center, Gardiner, and the West End (Allen
Logging) as Resource Based Industrial Zones. The Preferred Alternative proposes that any future
subdivision of rural residential land not exceed 1:5, 1:10, or 1:20 acre densities. In addition, the
revised Draft Plan contains an Essential Public Facilities Element which contains goals, policies, and
strategies for siting these facilities and for ensuring maintenance of the primary aviation function of
the Jefferson County International Airport.
No Action Alternative – The no action alternative evaluated in 1998 was the County
Comprehensive Plan that was in effect prior to the process of the developing the Growth
Management Act plan in 1998.
DOCUMENTS ADOPTED
An agency may use previously prepared environmental documents to evaluate proposed actions,
alternatives, or environmental impacts. The proposals may be the same as or different than those
analyzed in the existing documents (WAC 197-11-600[2]). These documents have been adopted in
association with the Proposal. See the Determination of Significance and Notice of Adoption published
April 4, 2018.
Exhibit 4. State Environmental Policy Act Documents Adopted
Year State Environmental Policy Act Document Description
1997-1998 Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements (DEIS/FEIS) and addenda prepared in
anticipation of adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in 1998. The DEIS and FEIS are dated
February 24, 1997 and May 27, 1998, respectively, and examined the potential cumulative
environmental impacts of adopting alternative versions of the Comprehensive Plan.
6/30/1999
8/18/1999
Draft Supplemental EIS (DSEIS)--Comprehensive Plan 1999 Amendments (Task III of Tri-
Area/Glen Cove Special Study)
Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan
1999 Amendments. Tri-Area/Glen Cove Special Study Task IV.
6/11/2001 Glen Cove/Tri-Area Special Study Supplemental EIS Final Decision Document, June 11, 2001
2002 Integrated Growth Management Act/State Environmental Policy Act Document Environmental
Review of a Non-Project Action: Draft Supplemental EIS August 21, 2002, to Supplement the
Comprehensive Plan Draft and Final EIS (1997) and Comprehensive Plan 1999 Amendments
Draft and Final SEIS. November 25, 2002 Integrated FSEIS 2002 Amendment Docket.
This FSEIS was appealed before the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings
Board (WWGMHB) of which the WWGMHB issued a Final Decision and Order (FDO) and
remanded it back to the Department for additional environmental review.
The county hired Wheeler Consulting, to prepare additional environmental review based on
the FDO. A DSEIS to the 2002 CPA SEIS was issued on March 3, 2004. A FSEIS to the
2002 CPA SEIS was issued on May 12, 2004 as part of the review and in consideration of
MLA02-00235[LG2].
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 20
Year State Environmental Policy Act Document Description
2003 Staff Recommendation and Environmental Analysis with Regard to the Adoption of Four
Proposed Site-Specific Amendments to the 1998 Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. SEPA
Addendum August 6, 2003. Sept. 17, 2003 SEPA Addendum for Suggested Amendments
2004 2004 Staff Report and SEPA Addendum to 1998 EIS for UGA Amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan issued May 19, 2004.
2004 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket Department of Community Development
Integrated Staff Report and SEPA Addendum issued September 22, 2004.
2005 Integrated GMA/SEPA Addendum Staff Report, August 3, 2005. Incorporated by
reference: 1998 DEIS/FEIS and 2004 Addendum.
2006 Integrated GMA/SEPA Addendum Staff Rpt., July 19, 2006
2007 SEPA Addendum, adopting by reference 2004 Staff Report and SEPA Addendum for UGA
Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan issued May 19, 2004 and 2004 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Docket Department of Community Development Integrated Staff Report and
SEPA Addendum issued September 22, 2004.
2008 Integrated GMA/SEPA Addendum Staff Report, September 3, 2008. Adopted by
reference: 1998 DEIS/FEIS, and environmental documents from 2004, 2005, 2006, and
2007 environmental review
2009 Integrated GMA/SEPA Addendum Staff Report, September 2, 2009. Adopted by legal
notice: 1998 DEIS/FEIS, September 22nd Staff Report 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, "and
all supplementary information…supporting record, analyses, materials."
2010 Integrated GMA/SEPA Addendum Staff Report, September 2010.
2013 Integrated GMA/SEPA Addendum, Staff Report September 4, 2013. Adopted by reference
all previous SEPA documents.
2015 Staff Report & SEPA Environmental Review, Proposal to Amend Unified Development Code,
JCC 18.30.150 Sign Code, October 29, 2015. Integrated Growth Management Act/State
Environmental Policy Act Analysis, Environmental Review of a Non-Project Action.
Source: Jefferson County 2018
PROPOSAL COMPARISON TO PRIOR SEPA ALTERNATIVES AND EVALUATIONS
The current Proposal is like the Preferred Alternative studied in the addended 1998 EIS. The current
Proposal retains a similar land use plan and growth pattern with UGAs, Rural Centers, Master Planned
Resorts, Industrial areas, Airport, and Rural Residential lot sizes. No Future Land Use and Zoning Map
amendments are proposed with the current Proposal.
The Land Use Element included in the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update includes County’s 20-year
population allocations for the year 2038 consistent with Resolution #38-15. The prior population
projection assumed a population of 40,139 by 2024. New projections propose 39,221 by 2038. Thus,
proposed growth is nearly identical and would occur over a longer timeframe.
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 21
NON-PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air;
production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
The 1998 EIS noted that “Land use actions can increase the impact and change the timing of runoff which
can adversely impact downstream habitats and property. In addition, flood waters generated by
natural storm events, or exacerbated by upstream land uses, can cause damage to private and public
property and threaten the health and safety of humans.” These potential effects may occur with
development allowed under the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update. At the time of site development,
there may be fill and grade proposals, and vegetation may be removed, which may result in altered
surface water flows, increased stormwater flow, localized flooding impacts, and generation of non-point
source pollution to local surface waters. With greater impervious surfaces there would be less infiltration
of groundwater. However, the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan continues to designate more than
three-quarters of the zoned land in forestry, and very little of the land is designated as urban. The
County’s updated Comprehensive Plan includes policies supporting watershed planning and stormwater
management, as well as critical areas protection.
Emissions to air would most likely be associated with increased vehicle traffic. The proposal includes
policies to maintain and improve air quality. The plan promotes transit and non-motorized modes of
travel, and focuses most residential and employment growth in urban areas, resorts, and centers where
these alternative modes are more likely to be used.
Short-term air emissions including construction equipment exhaust and fugitive dust may occur during the
construction phase for new development. Hauling routes and local streets could be impacted by dust if
mitigation measures are not implemented, but all construction projects will be consistent with the County’s
erosion control development standards.
Land development that may occur following adoption of the plan and associated development
regulations may create short-term noise impacts to land uses in the vicinity. Increases in traffic volumes
generated within the study are likely the primary source of future noise. The County plan includes
proposed policies addressing limiting noise effects.
Some commercial or industrial uses may handle hazardous materials though the Uniform Fire Code and
state and federal laws would apply.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
At the time of building permit requests, the International Building Code includes conditions under which
preparation of a geotechnical report would be required. Future development would also comply with
County critical areas regulations to reduce health and safety risks related to geologic hazards.
Development is subject to applicable federal (EPA), regional (Olympic Region Clean Air Agency), and
State (Ecology) air quality regulations. Ecology air quality regulations applicable to the study area are
found at Chapter 173-400 WAC.
Future development would comply with the County’s stormwater requirements in place at the time of
application.
Maximum environmental noise levels are regulated by Jefferson County Code Chapter 8.70 Noise
Control. Construction noise levels will comply with the code.
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 22
New development of specific parcels will be subject to County zoning for allowable uses and activities,
and County adopted International Building and Fire codes for handling hazardous materials as well as
State and Federal hazardous materials regulations.
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
As noted in the 1998 EIS, “[w]ildlife habitats in the County include marine shorelines, rivers, streams,
wetlands, lake riparian vegetation zones, forest land, and known nesting sites.”
Future development allowed by the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations could affect plants
and animals through land clearing for construction of housing and infrastructure, stormwater runoff and
other disturbance associated with future growth, and rural and resource land practices.
Environmental resources subject to risk of direct and indirect impacts include numerous species of plants,
animals, and fisheries (including threatened or endangered species and their habitat).
The 1998 EIS noted the following measures as reducing impacts:
Implementation of the low-density patterns recommended in the various alternatives would help to
conserve habitat areas.
Policies to allow and encourage clustering based on protecting habitat values would strengthen the
mitigation provided by the low-density planning initiatives.
Adoption of resource lands measures will assist in conserving forest and agricultural habitat values
for some species associated with those uses from conversion to rural development.
The Comprehensive Plan Update in 2018 continues to reflect these measures.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
Over three-quarters of the County is current in a forested condition and zoned to stay with forestry.
Another 20% would remain Rural Residential. Plan policies continue to promote clustering. Additionally,
new policies promote low impact development techniques in rural and resource lands areas. County
policies and regulations continue to protect critical areas including fish and wildlife habitat conservation
areas. Shoreline Master Program policies and regulations are also designed to achieve no-net-loss of
shoreline ecological function. These measures could further reduce impacts.
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
The Study Area is served by electricity. Energy is primarily used for heating. Multifamily and mixed-use
developments in UGAs can conserve energy and resources, relative to what would be expended by and
needed for suburban residential and single-use commercial development patterns. The County also
focuses growth in resort and rural centers.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
At JCC 15.05.030, Jefferson County has adopted the State Energy Code. The County is also considering
energy conservation, promotion of electric vehicles, and climate change policies as part of the
Comprehensive Plan Update.
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 23
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or
areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks,
wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, flood plains, or prime farmlands?
Greater population and employment growth would mean greater demand for parks and recreation
facilities and services. Historic and cultural sites would remain protected by federal, state, and County
regulations and policies; as growth occurs, any alterations to such sites would require evaluation and
mitigation.
Regarding habitat, floodplains, and wetlands, critical areas protections would apply – see Section B
above. Lands of long-term significance for agriculture would retain their designation and zoning.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
The County Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan (2015) anticipates future growth consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
County critical areas policies and regulations address threatened or endangered species habitat,
wetlands, and floodplains.
Proposed Natural Resources policies continue to support agricultural activities consistent with the Growth
Management Act and support accessory uses permitted in the Act to support agricultural viability.
Future projects will adhere to and comply with all State and federal laws including those summarized
below.
Washington State has a number of laws that oversee the protection and proper excavation of
archaeological sites (RCW 27.53, WAC 25‐48), human remains (RCW 27.44), and historic
cemeteries or graves (RCW 68.60). Under RCW 27.53, Department Archaeology and Historic
Preservation regulates the treatment of archaeological sites on both public and private lands and
has the authority to require specific treatment of archaeological resources. All precontact resources
or sites are protected, regardless of their significance or eligibility for local, state, or national
registers. Historic archaeological resources or sites are protected unless DAHP has made a
determination of “not‐eligible” for listing on the WHR and the NRHP.
In the event that human remains, burials, funery items, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony
are found during project implementation, all provisions of RCW 68.50.645 apply including
notification of appropriate authorities.
In the event that prehistoric artifacts or historic-period artifacts or features are found during project
implementation, all work must cease within 200 feet of the find, Washington State Department
Archaeology and Historic Preservation must be contacted, and all provisions of RCW 27.53.060
shall be adhered to.
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 24
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it
would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
Population Growth
As described previously the Land Use Element included in the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update includes
County’s 20-year population allocations for the year 2038 consistent with Resolution #38-15. The prior
population projection assumed a population of 40,139 by 2024. New projections propose 39,221 by
2038. Thus, proposed growth is nearly identical and would occur over a longer timeframe.
Further, the population growth allocations, retained land use plan, and retained and new policies continue
to focus growth in UGAs and Master Planned Resorts.
About 36% of the projected countywide growth would be planned for and accommodated within the
Port Townsend UGA, an increase from 30.5% in 2010. The Port Hadlock/Irondale UGA would increase
its population share from 12% observed in 2010 to 19.4% in 2038 with implementation of urban
wastewater services and planned urban densities. Resort shares are based on development agreements
and expected growth trends.
Exhibit 5. Population Shares 2010 & 2038
Source: Jefferson County Resolution #38-15, BERK Consulting 2018.
Overall, with adopted plans and agreements, the urban and resort share would increase from 51% in
2010 to 70% in 2038. The rural share would decrease from 49% in 2010 to 30% in 2038. This is
consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan to protect rural character and offer more housing
and employment choices in urban areas in particular and secondarily in resort areas where urban
services are available.
Land Use
Categories of rural, resource, and urban future land use designations and zoning districts are listed
below. Acreage statistics illustrate the great predominance of forest resource land designations / zoning
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 25
at over 76% of zoned land. Rural Residential categories represent about 20% of zoned land. Master
Planned Resorts make up about 0.6% of zoned land. UGA land use designations / zoning is at 0.2%.
Exhibit 6. Future Land Use Designations / Zoning Districts & Acreage
General Category Future Land Use
Designation / Zoning District
Acres Percent
Rural
Rural Residential RR-5, RR-10, RR-20 86,341 20.1%
Rural Commercial RVC, GC, NC, CC 249 0.1%
Rural Industrial LI/M, LI/C, LI, HI, RI 519 0.1%
Resort
Master Planned Resorts MPR-BRN, MPR-SF-4, MPR-SFT,
MPR-MF-10, MPR-RC/CF, MPR-VC,
MPR-RA, MPR-0SR
2,366 0.6%
Resource Lands
Agriculture Resource Lands AP-20, AL-20 7,281 1.7%
Forest Resource Lands IF-20, RF-40, CF-80 328,785 76.4%
Mineral Resource Lands MRLO/CF-80 161 0.04%
Urban Growth Area
Urban Growth Area Residential UGA-LDR, UGA-MDR, UGA-HDR 736 0.2%
Urban Growth Area Commercial UGA-UC, UGA-VOC 234 0.1%
Urban Growth Area Industrial UGA-LI 25 0.01%
Urban Growth Area Public UGA-P 68 0.02%
Public
Public Parks, Preserves, and Recreation PPR 2,812 0.7%
Essential Public Facilities EPF-A, EPF-WM 534 0.1%
Total 430,110 100%
Source: Jefferson County GIS 2018; BERK Consulting, 2018
Shoreline Use
The current Proposal retains the Shoreline Master Program and incorporates it by reference into the
Comprehensive Plan. Growth along the shorelines would occur consistent with the adopted plan and
would be required to meet preferred use, public access, and ecological protection provisions.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
The County’s Unified Development Code at Title 18 provides specific zoning regulations guiding land use,
bulk, height, landscaping, parking, as well as critical areas regulations, shoreline regulations, and the
State Environmental Policy Act. Future development would be subject to these standards.
Proposed policies promote visual corridors and tree retention, retaining dark skies, and encouraging low
impact development standards.
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
services and utilities?
Future growth would add multimodal trips to the City’s transportation network, and increase demand for
public facilities and services.
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 26
Transportation
The Transportation Element addresses roads, transit, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The
Transportation Element is designed to support the growth planned in the Land Use Element.
Jefferson County’s adopted level of service standards are consistent with the standards established by
the PRTPO and the Washington State Department of Transportation. These standards are as follows:
Rural Roads (roads outside an urban boundary line) = LOS C
Urban Roads (roads within an urban boundary line) = LOS D
Master Planned Resort Roads (roads within an MPR boundary line) = LOS D
Highways of Statewide Significance/Tourist Corridors (rural corridors carrying an urban level of
traffic) = LOS D
The Transportation Element projects that no concurrency issues or LOS deficiencies will occur on County
roads during the planning period. The capacity analysis and traffic forecasts indicate that at the
planning horizon year of 2038, all County roads are expected to operate at or above the adopted
level of service (LOS) standard. However, if any proposed development were to cause the level of
service to significantly fall below adopted levels, the proponents of the development would be required
to mitigate the deficiency prior to development approval.
Similar to the results of the County’s adopted Transportation Element (last updated in 2009 via ORD#09-
1109-09), a number of State Route segments will exceed their estimated capacity based on the level of
service standards established by Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and the
Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Organization (PRTPO), and the roadway LOS methodology
adopted by the County. These LOS standards are based on roadway classification. For this analysis, the
roadways within the UGA were assumed to be classified as urban (which increases the LOS standard
from LOS C to LOS D). It should be noted that they are currently classified as rural under WSDOT
standards. State highways that are forecast to not meet LOS standards within the planning period
include:
SR 104* (Paradise Bay Road to Jefferson/Kitsap County Line)
SR 19* (SR 116 to SR 20)
(*Portions of these same highways identified as above WSDOT standards in 2009.)
The Peninsula Regional Transportation Planning Organization utilized a similar methodology and process
for evaluating traffic forecasts and levels of service. However, it differed from the County as it utilized
directional PM peak hour roadway capacities instead of total daily volume capacities. The differences in
LOS methodology resulted in the following additional state highway segments exceeding capacity:
SR 104* (Eastbound direction from SR 19 to Paradise Bay Road)
US 101* (Both directions from SR 104 to SR 20)
SR 20* (Thomas Street to Kearney Street)
(*Portions of these same highways identified as above WSDOT standards in 2009.)
The state highway system is owned and maintained by WSDOT and serves regional and statewide travel
needs. While several roadway segments of the state highway system through Jefferson County are
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 27
expected to exceed adopted state LOS standards, further widening of the corridors to accommodate
future demand would require significant investments in capital dollars, impact adjoining property owners,
and would be beyond the financial capacity of Jefferson County.
Exhibit 7. Existing and Forecast ADT and LOS
Planning
Area
Roadway From To LOS
Std
Roadway
Capacity
2016
ADT
2016
LOS
2038
ADT
2038
LOS
Discovery
Bay
Gardiner
Highway
101
Jefferson/
Clallam CL
Old
Gardiner
Rd
D 27,000 13,000 C 14,950 C
Highway
101
Old
Gardiner
Rd
Store Rd D 27,000 13,000 C 14,950 C
Highway
101
Store Rd SR 20 D 27,000 9,100 B 13,750 C
Highway
101
SR 20 SR 104 D 27,000 2,600 A 4,000 A
SR 104 Hwy 101 Center Rd D 27,000 8,900 B 14,500 C
SR 20 Hwy 101 Eaglemont
Rd
D 16,000 5,200 B 5,950 B
SR 20 Eaglemont
Rd
Anderson
Lake Rd
D 17,000 5,200 B 6,900 B
SR 20 Anderson
Lake Rd
Four
Corners Rd
D 21,000 5,200 A 7,550 B
Gardiner
Beach Rd
Clallam
County Line
Old
Gardiner
C 16,000 200 A 250 A
Gardiner
Beach Rd
Old
Gardiner
SR 101 C 16,000 300 A 350 A
W. Uncas
Rd
Hwy 101 Hwy 101 C 17,000 100 A 100 A
Leland/
Quilcene
Highway
101
SR 104 Leland
Valley Rd
D 27,000 2,400 A 2,750 A
Highway
101
Leland
Valley Rd
Lords Lake
Loop Rd
D 27,000 2,400 A 2,750 A
Highway
101
Lords Lake
Loop Rd
Quilcene
City Limit
D 27,000 3,100 A 3,550 A
Highway
101
Quilcene
City Limit
Center Rd D 27,000 3,100 A 3,550 A
Highway
101
Center Rd Washington
St
D 27,000 5,500 A 6,300 A
Highway
101
Washington
St
Penny
Creek Rd
D 27,000 4,200 A 4,800 A
Highway
101
Penny
Creek Rd
Buckhorn Rd D 27,000 3,000 A 3,450 A
Center Rd Hwy 101 Dabob Rd
S. End
C 18,000 3,100 A 3,650 A
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 28
Planning
Area
Roadway From To LOS
Std
Roadway
Capacity
2016
ADT
2016
LOS
2038
ADT
2038
LOS
Center Rd Dabob Rd
S. End
SR 104 C 18,000 3,100 A 3,650 A
Dabob Rd Dabob P.O.
Rd
Center Rd C 17,000 500 A 600 A
E. Columbia
St
Center Rd Hwy 101 C 15,000 600 A 700 A
E. Quilcene
Rd
Center Rd Lindsey Hill
Rd
C 15,000 500 A 600 A
E. Quilcene
Rd
Lindsey Hill
Rd
McDonald
Rd
C 16,000 100 A 100 A
Leland
Valley Rd
Hwy 101 Leland Cut-
off
C 16,000 100 A 100 A
Leland
Valley Rd
Leland Cut-
off
Hwy 101
(south)
C 16,000 100 A 100 A
Lindsey Hill
Rd
E. Quilcene
Rd
Lindsey
Beach
C 16,000 100 A 100 A
Linger
Longer Rd
Hwy 101 End C 16,000 600 A 700 A
Lords Lake
Loop Rd
Hwy 101 Lords Lake C 16,000 100 A 100 A
Lords Lake
Loop Rd
Lords Lake Snow Creek
Rd
C 16,000 200 A 250 A
Penny
Creek Rd
Hwy 101 National
Forest
Boundary
C 16,000 100 A 100 A
Snow Creek
Rd
Hwy 101 National
Forest
Boundary
C 17,000 200 A 250 A
Washington
St
Hwy 101 Hwy 101 C 16,000 300 A 350 A
Brinnon
Highway
101
Buckhorn Rd Bee Mill Rd D 27,000 3,000 A 3,450 A
Highway
101
Bee Mill Rd Dosewallips
Rd
D 27,000 3,000 A 3,450 A
Highway
101
Dosewallips
Rd
Mt. Jupiter
Rd
D 27,000 3,100 A 3,550 A
Highway
101
Mt. Jupiter
Rd
Duckabush
Rd
D 27,000 2,500 A 2,850 A
Highway
101
Duckabush
Rd
Seamount
Dr
D 27,000 2,500 A 2,850 A
Highway
101
Seamount
Dr
Mason/Jeff
erson C.L.
D 27,000 2,100 A 2,400 A
Bee Mill Rd Hwy 101 Point
Whitney Rd
C 16,000 300 A 350 A
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 29
Planning
Area
Roadway From To LOS
Std
Roadway
Capacity
2016
ADT
2016
LOS
2038
ADT
2038
LOS
Black Point
Rd
Hwy 101 Fulton Lake C 17,000 200 A 250 A
Dosewallips
Rd
Hwy 101 National
Forest
Boundary
C 16,000 100 A 100 A
Duckabush
Rd
Hwy 101 National
Forest
Boundary
C 17,000 300 A 350 A
Forest Dr Hwy 101 End C 15,000 100 A 100 A
Mt. Jupiter
Rd
Hwy 101 National
Forest
Boundary
C 16,000 100 A 100 A
Point
Whitney Rd
Bee Mill Rd End C 17,000 100 A 100 A
Seamount
Dr
Hwy 101 Forest
Service Rd
C 15,000 100 A 100 A
Tri-Area
SR 116/
Ness Corner
Rd
Rhody Rd Irondale Rd D 21,000 6,000 A 8,500 B
SR 116/
Oak Bay
Rd
Irondale Rd Flagler Rd D 21,000 6,000 A 8,500 B
SR 116/
Flagler Rd
Oak Bay
Rd
Indian
Island
Annex Rd
D 16,000 2,600 A 2,900 A
SR 19/
Airport Cut-
off
SR 20 Four
Corners
D 24,000 14,000 C 21,350 E
SR 19/
Rhody Dr
Four
Corners
SR
116/Ness
Corner Rd
D 21,000 13,000 C 18,850 E
SR 19/
Rhody Dr
SR 116/
Ness Corner
Rd
Center Rd D 21,000 10,000 C 12,000 C
Anderson
Lake Rd
SR 20 Rhody
Dr/SR 19
C 21,000 1,500 A 2,050 A
Cedar Ave SR 116/
Ness Corner
Rd
Irondale Rd D 17,000 1,000 A 1,900 A
Chimacum
Rd
Beaver
Valley Rd/
SR 19
Elkins Road C 17,000 5,000 B 7,600 B
Chimacum
Rd
Elkins Road Oak Bay
Road
D 21,000 5,000 A 8,050 B
E. Maude St 5th Ave 7th Ave D 16,000 300 A 450 A
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 30
Planning
Area
Roadway From To LOS
Std
Roadway
Capacity
2016
ADT
2016
LOS
2038
ADT
2038
LOS
Four
Corners
SR 20 Airport Cut-
off/ SR 19
C 17,000 2,600 A 4,000 A
Tri-Area
(Con-
tinued)
Irondale Rd Rhody
Rd/SR 19
Patison
Street
D 18,000 5,400 B 10,400 C
Irondale Rd Patison St SR
116/Ness
Corner Rd
D 17,000 5,100 B 10,500 C
Kala Point
Rd
Prospect Rd Kala Point
Developme
nt
C 17,000 2,000 A 2,750 A
Lower
Hadlock Rd
Oak Bay
Rd/ SR 116
Water St D 16,000 500 A 900 A
Mason St Cedar Ave Thomas Dr D 18,000 900 A 1,950 A
Oak Bay
Rd
Sentinal Firs
Rd
Flagler
Rd/SR 116
C 17,000 2,500 A 3,550 A
Patison St S. 7th St Irondale Rd D 17,000 800 A 900 A
Prospect
Ave
Airport Cut-
off/ SR 19
Kala Point
Dr
D 21,000 2,700 A 3,750 A
S. 7th Ave Thomas Dr Patison St D 16,000 500 A 1,000 A
Thomas Dr Mason St S. 7th Ave D 16,000 600 A 1,250 A
5th Ave Irondale Rd E. Maude St D 15,000 800 A 1,650 A
7th Ave Irondale Rd W. Swaney
St.
D 16,000 900 A 1,700 A
3rd St Cedar Ave Irondale Rd D 16,000 300 A 450 A
Central/
Inland
Valley
SR 104 Center Rd Beaver
Valley
Rd/SR 19
D 27,000 8,900 B 13,850 C
SR 19/
Beaver
Valley Rd
Center Rd Swansonvill
e Rd
D 21,000 7,100 B 10,900 C
SR 19/
Beaver
Valley Rd
Swansonvill
e Rd
Larson Lake
Rd
D 21,000 6,400 B 9,900 C
SR 19/
Beaver
Valley Rd
Larson Lake
Rd
Oak Bay
Rd
D 21,000 6,400 B 9,850 B
SR 19/
Beaver
Valley Rd
Oak Bay
Rd
SR 104 D 21,000 6,400 B 9,750 B
Center Rd SR 104 Eaglemont
Rd
C 18,000 2,600 A 3,550 A
Center Rd Eaglemont
Rd
Egg and I
Rd
C 18,000 2,600 A 3,550 A
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 31
Planning
Area
Roadway From To LOS
Std
Roadway
Capacity
2016
ADT
2016
LOS
2038
ADT
2038
LOS
Center Rd Egg and I
Rd
Beaver
Valley
Rd/SR 19
C 18,000 3,100 A 4,250 A
Eaglemount
Rd
SR 20 Center Rd C 17,000 600 A 800 A
Egg & I Rd W. Valley
Rd
Center Rd C 15,000 200 A 350 A
Egg & I Rd Center Rd Beaver
Valley
Rd/SR 19
C 15,000 400 A 550 A
Larson Lake
Rd
Center Rd Beaver
Valley
Rd/SR 19
C 16,000 300 A 400 A
Sandy
Shore Rd
SR 104 Larson Lake
Rd
C 15,000 100 A 150 A
W. Valley
Rd
Eaglemont
Rd
Rhody
Dr/SR 19
C 21,000 500 A 750 A
Quimper/
Glen
Cove
SR 20 Four
Corners Rd
SR
19/Airport
Cut-off
D 21,000 5,200 A 6,600 B
SR 20 SR
19/Airport
Cut-off
Mill/
Discovery
Rd
D 24,000 18,000 D 26,700 F
Carrol Ave Glen Cove
Rd
S. 8th St C 10,000 300 A 400 A
Fredericks
St
SR 20 Otto St C 10,000 400 A 600 A
Glen Cove
Rd
North Otto
St
Carrol Ave C 10,000 300 A 400 A
Mill Rd SR 20 Paper Mill C 10,000 1,900 A 4,400 B
North Otto
St
Fredericks
St
Glen Cove
Rd
C 10,000 400 A 500 A
Otto St Fredericks
St
Seton Rd C 10,000 600 A 800 A
Seton Rd. SR 20 Otto St C 10,000 1,100 A 1,650 A
Thomas St SR 20 Paper Mill C 10,000 800 A 1,700 A
S. 8th St Carrol Ave Mill Rd C 10,000 300 A 400 A
Quimper
Cape
George Rd
Discovery
Rd
Beckett
Point Rd
C 16,000 2,000 A 2,850 A
Cape
George Rd
Beckett
Point Rd
Hastings
Ave W
C 16,000 2,300 A 3,250 A
Cape
George Rd
Hastings
Ave W
Discovery
Rd
C 16,000 800 A 1,100 A
Cook Ave
Extension
Hastings
Ave W
City Limit D 16,000 1,100 A 3,500 A
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 32
Planning
Area
Roadway From To LOS
Std
Roadway
Capacity
2016
ADT
2016
LOS
2038
ADT
2038
LOS
Discovery
Rd S
SR 20 Cape
George Rd
(south)
C 17,000 3,000 A 5,050 B
Discovery
Rd S
Cape
George Rd
(south)
Cape
George Rd
(north)
C 16,000 1,400 A 2,600 A
Discovery
Rd S
Cape
George Rd
(north)
SR 20 C 17,000 2,700 A 4,000 A
Hastings
Ave W
Cape
George Rd
N Jacob
Miller Rd
C 16,000 1,600 A 2,100 A
Hastings
Ave W
S. Jacob
Miller Rd
City Limits C 15,000 2,500 A 3,850 A
Hastings
Ave W
City Limits F St D 15,000 2,500 A 5,150 B
S Jacob
Miller Rd
Hastings Rd SR 20 C 17,000 1,800 A 2,300 A
Shine/
Paradise
Bay
SR 104 Beaver
Valley
Rd/SR 19
Teal Lake
Rd
D 27,000 15,000 C 23,350 D
SR 104 Teal Lake
Rd
Paradise
Bay Rd
D 27,000 15,000 C 23,350 D
SR 104 Paradise
Bay Rd
Kitsap/
Jefferson
C.L.
D 27,000 18,000 C 27,700 F
Andy
Cooper Rd
Teal Lake
Rd
Paradise
Bay Rd
C 16,000 100 A 100 A
Paradise
Bay Rd
SR 104 Andy
Cooper Rd
C 17,000 2,800 A 4,000 A
Paradise
Bay Rd
Andy
Cooper Rd
Watson Rd C 17,000 2,900 A 4,250 A
Shine Rd SR 104 Teal Lake
Rd
C 17,000 300 A 400 A
South Point
Rd
SR 104 Thorndyke
Rd
C 17,000 1,100 A 1,400 A
Teal Lake
Rd
SR 104 Andy
Cooper Rd
C 15,000 500 A 800 A
Thorndyke
Rd
Milepost 2 South Point
Rd
C 17,000 800 A 1,050 A
Marrow-
stone
SR 116/
Flagler Rd
Indian
Island
Annex Rd
Robbins Rd C 16,000 1,600 A 1,850 A
SR 116/
Flagler Rd
Robbins Rd Schwartz
Rd
C 16,000 1,100 A 1,250 A
SR 116/
Flagler Rd
Schwartz
Rd
Fort Gate
Rd
C 16,000 400 A 450 A
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 33
Planning
Area
Roadway From To LOS
Std
Roadway
Capacity
2016
ADT
2016
LOS
2038
ADT
2038
LOS
E. Beach Rd SR 116/
Flagler Rd
E.
Marrowston
e Rd
C 17,000 200 A 250 A
E.
Marrowston
e Rd
Robbins Rd E. Beach
Park Dr
C 16,000 300 A 350 A
Robbins Rd Flagler Rd/
SR 116
E.
Marrowston
e Rd
C 17,000 400 A 450 A
Coyle
Coyle Rd Dabob P.O.
Rd
Camp
Discovery
Rd
C 16,000 400 A 450 A
Coyle Rd Camp
Discovery
Rd
Thorndyke
Rd
C 16,000 400 A 450 A
Coyle Rd Thorndyke
Rd
Camp
Harmony
Rd
C 16,000 500 A 600 A
Coyle Rd Camp
Harmony
Rd
Hazel Point
Rd
C 17,000 400 A 450 A
Dabob Rd Center Rd Old Tarbo
Rd
C 17,000 500 A 600 A
Dabob Rd Old Tarbo
Rd
Dabob P.O.
Rd
C 15,000 300 A 350 A
Dabob P.O.
Rd
Dabob Rd Coyle C 15,000 600 A 700 A
Hazel Point
Rd
Coyle Rd Bay C 16,000 100 A 100 A
Thorndyke
Rd
Coyle Rd Milepost 2 C 17,000 800 A 900 A
Zelatched
Point Rd
Coyle Rd End C 16,000 100 A 100 A
Port
Ludlow/
N. Port
Ludlow
Highland Dr Teal Lake
Rd
End D 17,000 800 A 1,200 A
Oak Bay
Rd
Beaver
Valley Rd/
SR 19
Paradise
Bay Road
D 16,000 3,600 A 5,500 B
Oak Bay
Rd
Paradise
Bay Rd
Olympus
Blvd
D 17,000 3,600 A 5,050 B
Oak Bay
Rd
Olympus
Blvd
Olele Pt Rd D 17,000 3,600 A 4,700 A
Oak Bay
Rd
Olele Pt Rd Sentinal Firs
Rd
D 17,000 3,600 A 5,200 B
Osprey
Ridge Rd
Walker
Way
Oak Bay
Rd
D 17,000 1,100 A 1,550 A
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 34
Planning
Area
Roadway From To LOS
Std
Roadway
Capacity
2016
ADT
2016
LOS
2038
ADT
2038
LOS
Paradise
Bay Rd
Watson Rd Oak Bay
Rd
D 17,000 3,500 A 4,900 A
Pioneer Dr Swansonvill
e Rd
Swansonvill
e Rd
D 16,000 400 A 700 A
Swansonvill
e Rd
Beaver
Valley/ SR
19
Oak Bay
Rd
D 16,000 600 A 1,000 A
Teal Lake
Rd
Andy
Cooper Rd
Paradise
Bay Rd
D 18,000 300 A 450 A
Walker
Way
Oak Bay
Rd
Osprey
Ridge Rd
D 17,000 800 A 1,150 A
West End
Highway
101
Jefferson/
Grays
Harbor C.L.
Clearwater
Rd
D 27,000 1,100 A 1,250 A
Highway
101
Clearwater
Rd
Jefferson/
Grays
Harbor C.L.
D 27,000 1,100 A 1,250 A
Highway
101
Jefferson/
Grays
Harbor C.L.
Lower Hoh
Rd
D 27,000 1,100 A 1,250 A
Highway
101
Lower Hoh
Rd
Oil City Rd D 27,000 1,300 A 1,500 A
Highway
101
Oil City Rd Upper Hoh
Rd
D 27,000 1,500 A 1,700 A
Highway
101
Upper Hoh
Rd
Jefferson/C
lallam C.L.
D 27,000 1,500 A 1,700 A
Clearwater
Rd
Hwy 101 End of
county
section
C 16,000 100 A 100 A
Clearwater
Rd
End of
county
section
Owl Creek
Rd
C 16,000 100 A 100 A
Clearwater
Rd
Owl Creek
Rd
Hwy 101 C 18,000 100 A 100 A
Lower Hoh
Rd
Hwy 101 Hoh Village C 16,000 200 A 250 A
Maple
Creek Rd
Owl Creek
Rd
End C 16,000 100 A 100 A
Oil City Rd Hwy 101 Goodman
Mainline
C 16,000 200 A 250 A
Oil City Rd Goodman
Mainline
National
Park
C 16,000 200 A 250 A
Owl Creek
Rd
Clearwater
Rd
Maple
Creek Rd
C 16,000 100 A 100 A
Queets
River Rd
Hwy 101 Salmon
River Rd
C 16,000 100 A 150 A
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 35
Planning
Area
Roadway From To LOS
Std
Roadway
Capacity
2016
ADT
2016
LOS
2038
ADT
2038
LOS
Queets
River Rd
Salmon
River Rd
End C 16,000 100 A 150 A
Quinault-S.
Shore Rd
Grays
Harbor Rd
National
Park
C 16,000 100 A 100 A
Upper Hoh
Rd
Hwy 101 Oscar
Peterson Rd
C 17,000 300 A 350 A
Upper Hoh
Rd
Oscar
Peterson Rd
Maple
Creek Rd
C 16,000 200 A 250 A
Upper Hoh
Rd
Maple
Creek Rd
National
Park
C 16,000 200 A 250 A
Source: Existing ADT Counts WSDOT and Jefferson County Traffic Counts from 2016, 2015 and 2014
Forecast 2038 ADT based on growth rates defined in Traffic Forecast Section Above
Roadway Capacity based on Exhibit 15-46 in HCM 2010, and estimates developed by Transpo Group 2017.
The LOS analysis performed above utilized a roadway capacity analysis that evaluated classified
roadways throughout the County. Individual intersections were only analyzed within the County’s Tri-Area
focused on the Port Hadlock/Irondale UGA, and the results of the analysis are presented in the Land Use
Element and appendices of the Comprehensive Plan Update and summarized below.
Existing roadway traffic volumes were measured by Jefferson County and obtained from WSDOT’s
annual traffic report. SR 19 currently operates at LOS C, an acceptable level for the UGA. Outside of
the UGA boundary, SR 19 continues to operate at LOS C or better.
Existing intersection level of service results show that five of the twelve study intersections currently
operate at LOS E and LOS F. Each of these five intersections are two-way stop-controlled. For two-way
stop-controlled intersections, the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 methodology bases the LOS on the
vehicle delay for the worst movement (generally vehicles making a left onto the major road when
stopped on the minor road). While this methodology shows five intersections operating below standard,
the vehicles traveling along the major approaches currently experience little to no delay.
Under GMA and SEPA, new development and growth would not be required to mitigate existing
deficiencies. The County could require new development to mitigate conditions back to existing levels of
service, if traffic conditions worsen due to development.
Under existing conditions, roadway capacity on SR 19, SR 116 and all roadways in the Irondale-Port
Hadlock UGA are adequate. However, there are several unsignalized intersections along SR 19 in the
Irondale, Port Hadlock and Chimacum areas that experience long delays as vehicles wait for gaps in
traffic on SR 19. In order to accommodate the minor street delays while also maintaining mobility on SR
19, a minimum number of interruptions to traffic flow (traffic signals or roundabouts) should be pursued.
The most appropriate way to avoid excessive traffic control is to minimize the number of locations of
traffic access onto SR 19 as well as control turn movements onto SR 19. The intersection of SR 19 and SR
116 (Ness's Corner) currently experiences the greatest side-street delay, and is therefore the most
immediate need for signalization or roundabout installation. If traffic control is installed, traffic could be
redirected to this intersection by way of further road improvements to facilitate traffic circulation and
mobility. The benefits of this would include the following:
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 36
Limited access to SR19 would increase the mobility along SR19
Minimize impacts of growth to the neighborhoods along Irondale Rd.
Greater control of turn movements onto SR19
Reduce existing delays on the minor leg of the intersection
Provide safe, efficient route through the UGA for freight and other commercial traffic
Improved traffic control of the SR 19/SR 116 intersection would create sufficient gaps in traffic along SR
19 to allow safer, more comfortable turn movements onto SR 19. To reduce this delay, relieve congestion
and enhance safety, this intersection should be signalized or have a roundabout installed.
Several intersections experience similar problems to those of the SR19 /SR 116 intersection, such as SR
19 and Irondale Road, SR 19 and Prospect Avenue, and SR 19 and Four Corners Road. Excessive minor
leg delays should be reduced by improved traffic control at these intersections.
Based on projected volumes, intersection improvements will be required at the following intersections by
2038:
Chimacum Road and SR 116
SR 19 & Irondale Road
SR 19 & 4 Corners Road
SR 19 & SR 116
SR 116 & Cedar Ave
SR 19 & Woodland Dr
SR 19 & Prospect Ave
As growth and development continues in the Irondale-Port Hadlock UGA as planned over the next twenty
years, further improvements to the road system will be required to maintain adopted Level of Service
standards. New development could be required to pay for these improvements through new construction,
or pro-rata payments to defined improvements as discussed in the Transportation Facilities Assessment
section. A Traffic Impact Analysis would be needed for new developments to distinguish between existing
deficiencies (not growth funded) and deficiencies caused by the new development (growth funded). The
forecast 2038 intersection operations with and without improvements are compared in Exhibit 8.
Proposed improvement projects are illustrated in Exhibit 9.
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 37
Exhibit 8. Intersection Levels of Service – Current and Future – Tri-Area of County
Source: Transpo Group 2017
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 38
Exhibit 9. Port Hadlock/Irondale Area Transportation Improvement Projects
Source: Transpo Group 2017
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 39
Public Services and Capital Facilities
The demand for public services and facilities will increase as the population and employment grows. The
Facilities and Utilities Element adopts levels of service for facilities and services that support growth. The
Capital Facilities Plan Technical Appendix also identifies needed facilities and associated timing and
revenues to support the facilities.
Exhibit 10. Increased Demand for Public Services and Capital Facilities
Service Projected Demand for Service
Sheriff County facilities for corrections, justice facilities, and administration space are
anticipated to be adequate for the population based on trends in demand. A new
justice facility may be needed later in the 20-year planning period for
operational concerns.
Parks Consistent with the 2015 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan, there is a need
to add trails today and by the six-year period through 2023. More Parks and
Trails may be needed by 2038 if maintaining County levels of service. Trail
extension projects are planned through 2035. Parks levels of service could be
adjusted past 2023 or additional parks planned in the next system plan update.
Wastewater The County has planned for a sewer system to serve Port Hadlock/Irondale UGA.
The Comprehensive Plan Update includes policies to allow for alternative
wastewater systems that do not preclude future installation of sewer service.
Stormwater The County has adopted a 2006 Surface Water Plan and implements State
Department of Ecology manuals for stormwater management. Those plans and
policies would be retained.
Water The 1997 Jefferson County Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP) used the
following anticipated population and assumptions when making its 20-year level
of service projections; in 1996 the future 2016 population estimate was 39,389
very similar to the 2038 projection at 39,221. Thus, countywide at a planning
level, available rights and capacity demand can be met by the service providers.
Also, the CWSP projected a demand of 14.6 million gallons per day (MGD), which
did not take into account water efficiencies which have been met since the original
plan. The System Plan is currently under update.
Overall, while the County has enough total water capacity to continue to meet
forecasted demand, future developments, e.g. master planned developments, and
development in UGAs as well as rural growth, may impact specific water systems.
Implementation of area-specific water system plans would address system
extension and improvement as development occurs.
Areas on private well water would be subject to in-stream rules where applicable.
Fire As growth occurs, there may be a need for additional fire or emergency medical
apparatus. Adjustments to adopted policies to reflect effect levels of service may
be appropriate.
Schools Most districts would be consistent with student/classroom ratios in the adopted
plan, and it is anticipated that as growth occurs and students are added, the rate
of growth would allow absorption into the schools. If needed portables or other
management measures may be employed.
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 40
Service Projected Demand for Service
Power &
Telecommunication
Increased growth will increase demand for these services. Service delivery will
occur in concert with state rules and provider plans.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
The proposed Transportation Element and Transportation Technical Appendix (Transpo Group 2017 and
Jefferson County Public Works 2018) and the proposed Capital Facilities and Utilities Element and
Capital Facilities Plan Technical Appendix (BERK Consulting and Jefferson County 2018). These plans
identify current conditions, the impacts of growth, desired levels of service, capital facilities required to
meet adopted levels of service, and a funding plan for improvements.
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws
or requirements for the protection of the environment.
The Comprehensive Plan Update is designed to meet GMA requirements for a review and evaluation by
June 2018, including development regulations. See Exhibit 11.
Exhibit 11. Growth Management Act (GMA) Goal Consistency
GMA Goal Discussion
Urban growth. Encourage development in urban
areas where adequate public facilities and
services exist or can be provided in an efficient
manner.
Most growth is planned in UGAs or Master Planned
Resorts where services are available.
Reduce sprawl. Reduce the inappropriate
conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling,
low-density development.
See above regarding the focus of growth. Most of the
County will retain zoning for resource lands or rural
uses at over 95%.
Transportation. Encourage efficient multimodal
transportation systems that are based on
regional priorities and coordinated with county
and city comprehensive plans.
The County is planning for multiple modes of travel
consistent with the county and Peninsula RTPO plans.
Housing. Encourage the availability of
affordable housing to all economic segments of
the population of this state, promote a variety of
residential densities and housing types, and
encourage preservation of existing housing stock.
The Port Hadlock/Irondale UGA has sufficient capacity
to meet its population targets. Housing variety is
assured in the range of choices provided in the UGA
and in Limited Areas of More Intensive Rural
Development. The County is updating its Housing
Element goals and policies.
Economic development. Encourage economic
development throughout the state that is
consistent with adopted comprehensive plans,
promote economic opportunity for all citizens of
this state, especially for unemployed and for
disadvantaged persons, promote the retention
and expansion of existing businesses and
recruitment of new businesses, recognize regional
differences impacting economic development
opportunities, and encourage growth in areas
experiencing insufficient economic growth, all
The County is updating its Economic Development
Element and focusing on partnerships with
organizations like Team Jefferson, the Port, and others.
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 41
GMA Goal Discussion
within the capacities of the state's natural
resources, public services, and public facilities.
Property rights. Private property shall not be
taken for public use without just compensation
having been made. The property rights of
landowners shall be protected from arbitrary
and discriminatory actions.
All properties are given a reasonable use of land, with
at least a single-family residence allowed.
Permits. Applications for both state and local
government permits should be processed in a
timely and fair manner to ensure predictability.
The County’s goal is to streamline the plan and make
targeted changes to regulations. The County intends to
continue to process permits in a timely and fair manner
with its available staff resources.
Natural resource industries. Maintain and
enhance natural resource-based industries,
including productive timber, agricultural, and
fisheries industries. Encourage the conservation of
productive forest lands and productive
agricultural lands, and discourage incompatible
uses.
The County continues to protect forestry, agriculture,
and mineral lands, and is considering the updating
policies for lands of long-term commercial significance.
Open space and recreation. Retain open space,
enhance recreational opportunities, conserve fish
and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural
resource lands and water, and develop parks
and recreation facilities.
The County will implement its Parks, Recreation, and
Open Space Plans (2015) and the Capital Facilities
Plan Technical Appendix.
Environment. Protect the environment and
enhance the state's high quality of life, including
air and water quality, and the availability of
water.
Environment Element text and policies are updated.
The County intends to make targeted amendments to
its critical areas regulations to match recent State
guidance for protection after Comprehensive Plan
adoption.
Citizen participation and coordination.
Encourage the involvement of citizens in the
planning process and ensure coordination
between communities and jurisdictions to
reconcile conflicts.
The County has published a schedule of public
engagement activities from 2014-2018 and has had
regular meetings with its Planning Commission.
Public facilities and services. Ensure that those
public facilities and services necessary to support
development shall be adequate to serve the
development at the time the development is
available for occupancy and use without
decreasing current service levels below locally
established minimum standards.
The County is updating its Facilities and Utilities
Element policies and technical appendix to assure
adequate services and facilities at adopted level of
service standards.
Historic preservation. Identify and encourage the
preservation of lands, sites, and structures that
have historical or archaeological significance.
The County is updating policies regarding historic
preservation or cultural resources consistent with this
goal.
Source: BERK Consulting 2018
April 4, 2018 Jefferson County| Periodic Review 2018 SEPA Addendum 42
Preparer
This addendum has been prepared under the direction of Jefferson County Department of Community
Development.
Preparer: ______Lisa Grueter, AICP, BERK Consulting__________
Date Submitted: __April 4, 2018___________________________
Responsible Official
Patty Charnas, Director of Community Development, 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368,
360-379-4493, pcharnas@co.jefferson.wa.us
Date: Signature:
UD
C
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
b
e
D
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
f
r
o
m
2
0
1
8
D
o
c
k
e
t
t
o
F
u
t
u
r
e
W
o
r
k
P
l
a
n
v
e
r
.
2
0
1
8
-
0
5
-
0
6
j
m
p
It
e
m
#
T
y
p
e
o
f
Ch
a
n
g
e
Co
d
e
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
8
M
1
8
.
1
0
.
0
3
0
A
d
d
d
e
f
i
n
i
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
“
C
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
E
f
f
e
c
t
s
o
f
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
s
i
n
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
”
a
s
u
s
e
d
i
n
1
8
.
1
5
.
6
1
0
.
S
e
e
18
.
2
5
.
1
0
0
(
3
)
(
a
a
)
,
a
n
d
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
o
n
r
e
v
i
e
w
p
a
g
e
8
.
10
1
8
.
1
0
.
1
9
0
A
d
d
d
e
f
i
n
i
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
S
t
a
n
d
i
n
g
.
C
f
.
1
8
.
0
5
.
0
8
5
(
3
)
.
23
M
1
8
.
1
5
.
0
4
0
T
a
b
l
e
3
-
1
F
i
x
a
w
k
w
a
r
d
a
d
j
e
c
t
i
v
a
l
a
d
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
"
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
"
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
i
n
"
M
a
r
i
j
u
a
n
a
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
p
r
o
d
u
c
e
r
"
,
"M
a
r
i
j
u
a
n
a
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
o
r
"
,
"
M
a
r
i
j
u
a
n
a
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
r
e
t
a
i
l
e
r
"
.
R
e
m
o
v
e
a
l
t
o
g
e
t
h
e
r
o
r
wr
i
t
e
a
s
"
M
a
r
i
j
u
a
n
a
p
r
o
d
u
c
e
r
(
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
)
"
.
P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
a
r
e
a
w
k
w
a
r
d
l
y
i
n
al
p
h
a
b
e
t
i
z
e
d
l
i
s
t
u
n
d
e
r
"
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
"
a
t
1
8
.
2
0
.
2
9
5
.
M
o
v
e
t
o
"
M
"
.
30
M
1
8
.
1
5
.
1
1
2
4
C
l
a
r
i
f
y
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
u
s
e
d
f
o
r
F
A
A
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
c
i
t
e
.
31
M
1
8
.
1
5
.
1
1
3
2
G
r
o
u
n
d
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
—
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
c
i
t
e
.
38
M
1
8
.
1
5
.
2
2
5
T
h
e
J
C
C
s
t
i
l
l
A
m
e
n
d
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
a
p
p
e
l
l
a
n
t
e
x
a
m
i
n
e
r
f
o
r
t
h
e
R
e
a
s
o
n
a
b
l
e
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
U
s
e
Va
r
i
a
n
c
e
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
D
o
e
s
t
h
i
s
m
e
a
n
t
h
a
t
w
e
w
o
u
l
d
s
t
i
l
l
u
s
e
t
h
e
a
p
p
e
l
l
a
n
t
e
x
a
m
i
n
e
r
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
t
h
e
s
e
in
s
t
a
n
c
e
s
?
S
h
o
u
l
d
t
h
i
s
b
e
d
o
c
k
e
t
e
d
?
O
r
h
a
s
i
t
a
l
r
e
a
d
y
b
e
e
n
?
1
8
.
1
5
.
2
2
5
N
o
t
i
c
e
.
39
M
J
C
C
1
8
.
1
5
.
2
5
5
J
C
C
1
8
.
1
5
.
2
5
5
(
3
)
(
a
)
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
a
n
o
u
t
d
a
t
e
d
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
O
n
-
s
i
t
e
S
e
w
a
g
e
C
o
d
e
.
I
b
e
l
i
e
v
e
i
t
a
n
d
sh
o
u
l
d
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
W
A
C
2
4
6
-
2
7
2
-
2
2
5
0
1
.
47
M
1
8
.
1
5
.
5
7
2
R
e
v
i
e
w
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
y
a
w
k
w
a
r
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
1
8
.
1
5
.
4
7
0
"
A
r
t
i
c
l
e
V
I
-
L
R
e
m
o
t
e
R
u
r
a
l
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
W
e
s
t
E
n
d
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
A
r
e
a
a
n
d
t
h
e
B
r
i
n
n
o
n
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
A
r
e
a
"
a
n
d
1
8
.
1
5
.
5
7
2
"
A
r
t
i
c
l
e
V
I
-
O
S
m
a
l
l
-
S
c
a
l
e
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
T
o
u
r
i
s
t
(
S
R
T
)
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
"
-
-
w
h
i
c
h
i
s
r
e
f
e
r
r
i
n
g
o
n
l
y
t
o
B
r
i
n
n
o
n
Su
b
a
r
e
a
P
l
a
n
.
R
e
n
a
m
e
A
r
t
i
c
l
e
V
I
-
O
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
"
B
r
i
n
n
o
n
S
u
b
a
r
e
a
P
l
a
n
"
o
r
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
a
l
l
S
R
T
i
n
o
n
e
ar
e
a
.
S
e
e
a
l
s
o
A
r
t
i
c
l
e
V
I
I
-
-
S
u
b
a
r
e
a
P
l
a
n
s
;
1
8
.
1
5
.
5
8
0
B
r
i
n
n
o
n
S
u
b
a
r
e
a
P
l
a
n
.
49
M
1
8
.
1
5
.
6
1
0
(
2
)
(
b
)
M
I
D
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
.
A
n
a
l
y
z
i
n
g
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
o
f
m
a
j
o
r
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
-
-
u
s
e
s
t
e
r
m
"
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
ef
f
e
c
t
s
"
w
h
i
c
h
s
h
o
u
l
d
p
r
o
b
a
b
l
y
b
e
d
e
f
i
n
e
d
.
51
M
1
8
.
1
5
.
6
3
5
R
e
a
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
A
r
t
i
c
l
e
n
e
e
d
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
B
o
a
r
d
’
s
l
e
g
i
s
l
a
t
i
v
e
a
c
t
i
o
n
.
Re
f
e
r
s
t
o
c
o
d
e
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
M
a
j
o
r
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
(
M
I
D
)
-
-
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
p
u
b
l
i
c
h
e
a
r
i
n
g
a
n
d
re
a
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
a
c
t
i
o
n
.
R
e
v
i
e
w
G
r
o
w
t
h
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
(
G
M
A
)
a
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
s
.
52
S
1
8
.
1
8
C
o
d
e
I
n
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
6
/
1
0
/
2
0
0
9
e
x
p
l
a
i
n
i
n
g
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
a
n
d
u
r
b
a
n
z
o
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
l
o
t
c
o
m
b
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
Re
v
i
e
w
i
n
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
c
o
d
e
t
e
x
t
t
h
a
t
i
s
m
o
r
e
e
x
p
o
s
i
t
o
r
y
.
59
S
1
8
.
1
8
.
1
0
0
(
2
)
(
g
)
U
G
A
s
i
g
n
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
d
i
f
f
e
r
f
r
o
m
1
8
.
3
0
.
1
5
0
(
8
)
(
d
)
a
n
d
m
a
y
b
e
i
m
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
b
l
e
r
e
s
t
r
a
i
n
t
o
n
s
p
e
e
c
h
.
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
l
y
,
n
e
e
d
t
o
r
e
v
i
e
w
s
i
g
n
c
o
d
e
a
c
r
o
s
s
U
D
C
f
o
r
c
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
1
8
.
1
8
,
1
8
.
2
0
a
n
d
1
8
.
2
5
.
Re
v
i
e
w
f
o
r
c
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
"
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
c
r
u
t
i
n
y
"
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
.
69
S
1
8
.
2
0
.
2
9
5
(
4
)
(
g
)
1
8
.
2
0
.
2
9
5
(
4
)
(
g
)
–
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
M
a
r
i
j
u
a
n
a
:
s
i
t
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
a
l
l
h
a
v
e
“
T
y
p
e
A
”
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
p
a
r
c
e
l
s
.
T
h
i
s
i
s
n
o
n
s
e
n
s
e
n
o
t
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
f
o
r
r
e
t
a
i
l
.
A
d
d
t
e
x
t
he
r
e
a
b
o
u
t
a
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
a
d
a
p
t
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
.
70
S
1
8
.
2
0
.
1
4
0
J
C
C
1
8
.
2
0
.
1
4
0
n
e
e
d
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
I
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
s
.
71
M
1
8
.
2
0
.
1
5
0
(
1
)
(
c
)
U
p
d
a
t
e
R
C
W
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
.
72
M
1
8
.
2
0
.
1
6
0
(
5
)
(
c
)
+
R
e
v
i
s
e
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
o
f
m
o
r
a
t
o
r
i
u
m
a
n
d
a
d
d
t
h
e
o
n
e
a
c
r
e
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
1
8
.
2
0
.
1
6
0
(
5
)
(
c
)
(
a
s
s
e
s
s
o
r
a
l
l
o
w
s
on
e
-
a
c
r
e
s
i
t
e
a
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
t
o
r
e
m
a
i
n
u
n
d
e
r
f
o
r
e
s
t
r
y
t
a
x
c
a
t
e
g
o
r
y
.
)
73
M
1
8
.
2
0
.
1
6
0
(
5
)
T
h
e
t
e
x
t
o
f
R
C
W
7
6
.
0
9
.
0
6
0
a
n
d
J
C
C
1
8
.
2
0
.
1
6
0
(
5
)
a
r
e
c
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
i
n
g
.
T
h
e
t
e
x
t
n
e
e
d
s
t
o
b
e
u
p
d
a
t
e
d
t
o
co
i
n
c
i
d
e
w
i
t
h
o
n
e
a
n
o
t
h
e
r
.
[
F
o
r
e
s
t
P
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
s
A
c
t
,
c
o
n
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
h
a
r
v
e
s
t
a
n
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
mo
r
a
t
o
r
i
u
m
.
]
77
M
1
8
.
2
0
.
2
0
0
I
n
c
l
u
d
e
m
a
r
i
j
u
a
n
a
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
i
o
n
l
i
s
t
f
o
r
h
o
m
e
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
.
79
M
1
8
.
2
0
.
2
9
5
U
p
d
a
t
e
n
a
m
e
o
f
“
L
i
q
u
o
r
a
n
d
C
a
n
n
a
b
i
s
B
o
a
r
d
”
.
A
d
d
d
e
f
i
n
i
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
l
i
c
e
n
s
e
a
n
d
l
i
c
e
n
s
e
e
.
81
M
1
8
.
2
0
.
2
9
5
(
3
)
(
b
)
A
d
d
U
S
E
i
n
"
A
l
l
o
w
e
d
a
s
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
d
i
s
c
r
e
t
i
o
n
a
r
y
(
C
(
d
)
)
u
s
e
w
i
t
h
a
c
o
t
t
a
g
e
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
y
p
e
r
m
i
t
…
"
84
M
1
8
.
2
0
.
3
5
0
(
3
)
(
j
)
(
v
)
“
C
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
e
f
f
e
c
t
”
o
r
“
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
”
u
n
d
e
f
i
n
e
d
[
u
s
e
d
e
f
i
n
i
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
S
t
a
t
e
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
-
RC
W
o
r
W
A
C
]
.
88
M
1
8
.
2
2
.
1
2
0
(
5
)
U
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
P
r
o
p
a
n
e
S
t
o
r
a
g
e
T
a
n
k
s
i
n
C
A
R
A
s
—
r
e
v
i
s
e
t
o
m
e
e
t
d
e
f
i
n
i
t
i
o
n
o
f
“
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
e
d
Su
b
s
t
a
n
c
e
”
i
n
W
A
C
1
7
3
-
3
6
0
-
1
2
0
.
1
8
.
2
2
.
1
2
0
r
e
f
e
r
s
t
o
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
H
e
a
l
t
h
T
i
t
l
e
0
8
.
1
0
.
3
0
5
(6
)
(
a
)
(
i
v
)
.
C
o
n
f
e
r
w
i
t
h
W
A
C
a
n
d
E
H
d
e
f
i
n
i
t
i
o
n
s
.
U
p
d
a
t
e
d
e
f
i
n
i
t
i
o
n
s
i
n
1
8
.
1
0
.
0
8
0
"
H
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
Su
b
s
t
a
n
c
e
"
a
n
d
"
H
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
W
a
s
t
e
"
,
i
f
n
e
e
d
e
d
.
92
S
1
8
.
3
0
.
0
5
0
T
a
b
l
e
6
-
1
*
J
C
C
1
8
.
3
0
.
0
5
0
T
a
b
l
e
6
-
1
a
t
M
i
n
i
m
u
m
r
e
a
r
a
n
d
S
i
d
e
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
.
.
.
a
d
d
f
o
o
t
n
o
t
e
"
2
0
"
*F
o
o
t
n
o
t
e
2
0
.
"
I
f
a
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
d
e
p
e
n
d
s
o
n
t
w
o
o
r
m
o
r
e
l
o
t
s
o
r
p
a
r
c
e
l
s
t
o
b
e
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
a
s
o
n
e
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
s
o
f
c
o
m
p
l
y
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
i
s
t
i
t
l
e
o
f
a
n
y
o
t
h
e
r
pr
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
o
f
J
e
f
f
e
r
s
o
n
C
o
u
n
t
y
C
o
d
e
,
t
h
e
d
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
m
a
y
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
a
t
h
e
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
t
o
r
e
c
o
r
d
a
co
v
e
n
a
n
t
t
o
t
h
e
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
u
n
t
y
t
h
a
t
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
t
h
e
r
e
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
l
o
t
s
u
n
d
e
r
c
o
m
m
o
n
ow
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
a
n
d
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
f
o
r
t
h
e
d
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
u
s
e
i
s
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
.
"
*A
r
e
a
o
f
I
m
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
S
u
r
f
a
c
e
C
o
v
e
r
a
g
e
.
C
h
a
n
g
e
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
h
e
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
.
*N
o
t
e
1
5
r
e
:
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
n
p
a
r
c
e
l
<
o
n
e
a
c
r
e
,
s
h
o
w
i
t
'
s
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
d
,
d
e
m
o
n
s
t
r
a
t
e
ho
u
s
e
i
s
c
o
m
p
a
r
a
b
l
e
t
o
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
(
g
r
o
s
s
f
l
o
o
r
a
r
e
a
)
.
10
1
S
1
4
8
.
3
0
.
1
0
0
T
a
b
l
e
6
-
3
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
a
l
l
s
i
z
e
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
f
o
r
c
o
m
p
a
c
t
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
.
10
3
S
1
8
.
3
0
.
1
3
0
(
8
)
(
b
)
P
r
u
n
e
d
a
n
d
t
r
i
m
m
e
d
a
s
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
—
s
e
e
W
u
t
h
r
i
c
h
v
.
K
i
n
g
C
o
u
n
t
y
,
N
o
.
9
2
5
5
5
-
5
a
n
d
n
o
t
e
f
o
r
J
C
C
18
.
3
0
.
0
5
0
.
10
4
M
1
8
.
3
0
.
1
3
0
(
8
)
(
d
)
H
a
r
m
o
n
i
z
e
w
i
t
h
U
G
A
s
i
g
n
c
o
d
e
a
t
J
C
C
1
8
.
1
8
.
1
0
0
.
10
6
M
1
8
.
3
0
.
1
5
0
(
8
)
(
d
)
R
e
m
o
v
e
d
t
i
m
e
l
i
m
i
t
s
f
o
r
p
o
l
i
t
i
c
a
l
s
i
g
n
s
.
J
C
C
1
8
.
3
0
.
1
5
0
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
t
i
m
e
l
i
m
i
t
s
f
o
r
p
o
l
i
t
i
c
a
l
s
i
g
n
s
-
-
Re
e
d
v
.
C
i
t
y
o
f
M
a
g
u
i
r
e
U
.
S
.
S
u
p
r
e
m
e
C
o
u
r
t
a
p
p
l
i
e
s
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
c
r
u
t
i
n
y
t
o
a
n
y
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
co
n
t
e
n
t
.
R
e
m
o
v
e
t
h
e
p
o
l
i
t
i
c
a
l
t
i
m
e
l
i
m
i
t
s
s
o
t
h
e
y
a
r
e
n
o
t
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
e
d
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
l
y
f
r
o
m
r
e
a
l
e
s
t
a
t
e
si
g
n
s
,
e
t
c
e
t
e
r
a
.
J
M
P
10
7
M
1
8
.
3
0
.
1
5
0
(
6
)
(
r
)
*
(
r
)
n
e
e
d
h
e
i
g
h
t
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
i
n
g
"
u
r
b
a
n
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
"
z
o
n
e
t
o
o
.
11
8
S
1
8
.
3
5
.
4
7
0
M
a
k
e
t
h
e
c
o
n
d
o
m
i
n
i
u
m
-
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
–
J
C
C
1
8
.
3
5
.
4
7
0
–
l
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
c
l
e
a
r
e
r
w
i
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
ea
f
f
e
c
t
s
o
n
A
D
U
’
s
.
11
9
S
1
8
.
3
5
.
6
7
0
T
t
h
e
p
l
a
t
a
l
t
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
(
J
C
C
1
8
.
3
5
.
6
7
0
)
i
s
k
i
n
d
o
f
l
e
f
t
h
a
n
g
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
a
f
i
n
a
l
“
w
h
a
t
t
o
d
o
”
.
We
s
h
o
u
l
d
w
o
r
k
o
n
a
d
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
s
h
o
u
l
d
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
f
i
n
a
l
s
t
e
p
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
s
u
c
h
a
s
t
a
x
e
s
b
e
i
n
g
p
a
i
d
,
nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
c
o
p
i
e
s
f
o
r
f
i
n
a
l
,
s
i
g
n
a
t
u
r
e
b
l
o
c
k
s
,
e
t
c
.
P
l
e
a
s
e
l
e
t
m
e
k
n
o
w
i
f
y
o
u
’
d
l
i
k
e
m
e
t
o
w
o
r
k
o
n
th
i
s
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
12
1
M
1
8
.
4
0
.
0
3
0
(
5
)
E
d
i
t
s
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
"
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
e
d
p
u
r
s
u
a
n
t
t
o
…
"
f
o
r
c
l
a
r
i
t
y
.
12
9
M
1
8
.
4
0
.
1
3
0
(
2
)
R
e
v
i
e
w
t
e
x
t
a
n
d
r
e
v
i
s
e
f
o
r
c
l
a
r
i
t
y
.
L
o
o
k
s
l
i
k
e
c
u
t
/
p
a
s
t
e
f
r
o
m
R
C
W
a
n
d
n
o
t
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
l
y
i
n
c
o
n
t
e
x
t
.
13
3
S
1
8
.
4
0
.
2
3
0
A
a
l
a
n
d
:
I
n
f
i
r
s
t
p
a
r
a
g
r
a
p
h
,
c
h
a
n
g
e
d
t
h
e
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
t
o
c
o
m
b
i
n
e
t
h
e
n
o
t
i
c
e
o
f
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
th
r
e
s
h
o
l
d
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
“
m
a
y
”
t
o
“
s
h
a
l
l
”
c
o
m
b
i
n
e
t
o
c
o
n
f
o
r
m
w
i
t
h
1
8
.
4
0
.
7
8
0
(
1
)
(
c
)
13
3
S
1
8
.
4
0
.
2
3
0
[
N
o
t
e
:
t
h
i
s
i
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
a
l
a
r
g
e
r
i
s
s
u
e
o
f
n
o
t
i
c
i
n
g
b
e
f
o
r
e
a
p
p
e
a
l
p
e
r
i
o
d
r
u
n
s
o
u
t
.
13
3
S
1
8
.
4
0
.
2
3
0
S
t
a
f
f
:
N
o
t
i
c
i
n
g
t
i
m
e
f
r
a
m
e
s
i
n
J
C
C
1
8
.
4
0
.
2
3
0
d
o
n
o
t
a
g
r
e
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
o
s
e
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
J
C
C
18
.
4
0
.
3
3
0
(
2
)
(
b
)
a
n
d
(
3
)
-
S
E
P
A
n
o
t
i
c
e
c
a
n
n
o
t
b
e
c
o
m
b
i
n
e
d
f
o
r
n
o
t
i
c
i
n
g
a
s
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
J
C
C
18
.
4
0
.
2
3
0
i
n
c
a
s
e
o
f
S
E
P
A
a
p
p
e
a
l
(
d
u
e
t
o
S
E
P
A
a
p
p
e
a
l
n
o
t
i
c
i
n
g
t
i
m
e
f
r
a
m
e
s
)
.
Se
e
a
l
s
o
1
8
.
4
0
.
7
8
0
(
1
)
(
c
)
w
h
i
c
h
s
a
y
s
t
h
r
e
s
h
o
l
d
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
h
e
a
r
i
n
g
n
o
t
i
c
e
"
s
h
a
l
l
"
b
e
co
m
b
i
n
e
d
.
T
h
i
s
c
r
e
a
t
e
s
a
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
t
o
c
o
u
p
l
e
t
h
e
t
w
o
,
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
t
h
e
h
e
a
r
i
n
g
i
s
n
o
t
i
c
e
d
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
al
l
o
w
i
n
g
t
h
e
a
p
p
e
a
l
p
e
r
i
o
d
t
o
r
u
n
o
u
t
,
a
n
d
a
n
y
a
p
p
e
a
l
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
o
m
i
t
t
e
d
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
h
e
a
r
i
n
g
n
o
t
i
c
e
.
13
5
S
1
8
.
4
0
.
3
3
0
(
6
)
A
d
d
e
d
a
n
e
w
(
6
)
e
x
p
l
i
c
i
t
l
y
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
t
i
n
g
c
e
r
t
a
i
n
S
E
P
A
a
p
p
e
a
l
s
.
[
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
t
h
i
s
c
h
a
n
g
e
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
.
]
14
2
S
1
8
.
4
0
.
6
4
0
C
o
d
e
I
n
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
D
a
v
i
d
G
o
l
d
s
m
i
t
h
(
n
o
d
a
t
e
,
2
0
1
6
)
,
:
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
R
o
a
d
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
V
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
s
sh
a
l
l
b
e
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
A
r
t
i
c
l
e
I
X
,
1
8
.
4
0
.
6
4
0
V
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
T
y
p
e
s
-
-
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
,
a
s
a
d
i
s
t
i
n
c
t
v
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
i
n
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
t
o
o
t
h
e
r
t
y
p
e
s
o
f
v
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
c
o
d
e
.
R
e
f
e
r
a
l
s
o
t
o
1
8
.
3
0
.
0
5
0
T
a
b
l
e
6
-
1
fo
o
t
n
o
t
e
#
6
,
"
.
.
.
t
h
e
a
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
o
r
m
a
y
r
e
d
u
c
e
t
h
e
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
r
o
a
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
i
f
t
h
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
of
s
u
c
h
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
w
o
u
l
d
r
e
n
d
e
r
a
l
e
g
a
l
l
o
t
o
f
r
e
c
o
r
d
u
n
b
u
i
l
d
a
b
l
e
u
n
d
e
r
t
h
e
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
d
e
.
"
18
.
4
0
.
6
5
0
(
5
)
t
h
a
t
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
i
s
n
o
t
c
a
u
s
e
d
b
y
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
.
C
l
a
r
i
f
y
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
l
l
b
e
ev
a
l
u
a
t
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
v
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
.
E
n
s
u
r
e
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
a
n
d
e
q
u
i
t
a
b
l
e
r
e
v
i
e
w
f
o
r
a
l
l
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
s
.
14
3
S
1
8
.
4
0
.
7
6
0
(
3
)
(
a
)
(
i
)
A
d
d
m
o
r
e
d
e
t
a
i
l
e
d
“
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
”
l
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
14
4
S
1
8
.
4
0
.
8
1
0
(
8
)
D
e
l
e
t
e
d
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
m
a
i
l
n
o
t
i
c
e
o
f
a
p
p
e
a
l
t
e
n
d
a
y
s
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
h
e
a
r
i
n
g
.
14
7
S
1
8
.
4
0
.
0
3
0
A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
t
o
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
t
y
p
e
.
14
9
M
1
8
.
4
0
.
5
3
0
D
e
f
i
n
e
v
a
g
u
e
t
e
r
m
s
i
n
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
s
—
“
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
e
f
f
e
c
t
”
,
“
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
s
”
,
“
i
n
th
e
a
r
e
a
”
.
15
0
M
1
8
.
4
0
.
6
5
0
R
e
v
i
e
w
v
a
r
i
a
n
c
e
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
,
“
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
”
l
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
w
i
t
h
o
t
h
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
,
&
S
h
o
r
e
l
i
n
e
Ma
s
t
e
r
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
S
M
P
)
.
15
5
S
1
8
.
4
5
1
8
.
4
5
d
o
e
s
n
o
t
m
a
k
e
a
c
l
e
a
r
d
i
s
t
i
n
c
t
i
o
n
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
a
n
a
n
n
u
a
l
a
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
c
y
c
l
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
p
e
r
i
o
d
i
c
re
v
i
e
w
.
T
h
e
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
f
o
r
a
p
e
r
i
o
d
i
c
r
e
v
i
e
w
s
i
m
p
l
y
r
e
f
e
r
s
t
o
t
h
e
a
n
n
u
a
l
a
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
c
y
c
l
e
.
Th
e
r
e
f
o
r
e
,
t
o
h
a
n
d
l
e
t
h
e
s
c
o
p
e
o
f
a
p
e
r
i
o
d
i
c
r
e
v
i
e
w
,
D
C
D
h
a
s
t
o
p
a
s
s
a
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
t
o
d
e
f
e
r
a
n
n
u
a
l
am
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
s
s
o
t
h
a
t
w
e
’
r
e
n
o
t
“
t
r
y
i
n
g
t
o
c
h
a
n
g
e
a
f
l
a
t
t
i
r
e
w
h
i
l
e
t
h
e
c
a
r
i
s
t
r
a
v
e
l
l
i
n
g
”
.
A
p
e
r
i
o
d
i
c
re
v
i
e
w
o
f
t
h
e
C
P
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
n
e
e
d
s
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
D
C
D
t
o
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
a
w
o
r
k
p
l
a
n
w
i
t
h
i
t
s
o
w
n
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
.
15
8
S
1
8
.
5
0
.
0
6
0
(
6
)
*
N
o
t
i
c
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
s
e
r
v
e
d
t
h
r
e
e
d
a
y
s
a
f
t
e
r
p
o
s
t
i
n
g
18
.
5
0
.
0
6
0
*
E
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
:
N
o
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
O
r
d
e
r
–
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
b
y
m
a
i
l
,
c
h
a
n
g
e
p
o
s
t
m
a
r
k
d
a
t
e
t
o
“
3
d
a
y
s
a
f
t
e
r
po
s
t
m
a
r
k
”
15
9
S
1
8
.
5
0
.
1
1
0
(
1
)
(
d
)
C
i
v
i
l
a
n
d
c
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
p
e
n
a
l
t
i
e
s
—
w
h
e
n
f
i
n
e
s
a
c
c
r
u
e
,
p
o
s
t
m
a
r
k
d
a
t
e
t
o
“
3
d
a
y
s
a
f
t
e
r
p
o
s
t
m
a
r
k
”
.
Co
r
r
e
c
t
f
i
n
e
/
i
m
p
r
i
s
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
m
o
u
n
t
s
/
t
i
m
e
s
f
o
r
m
i
s
d
e
m
e
a
n
o
r
.
18
.
5
0
.
1
1
0
(
4
)
16
2
S
T
i
t
l
e
1
5
A
d
o
p
t
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
C
o
d
e
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
x
Q
f
o
r
T
i
n
y
H
o
m
e
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
.
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
e
l
y
a
d
o
p
t
o
u
r
ow
n
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
A
p
p
e
n
d
i
x
Q
.
S
e
e
e
m
a
i
l
s
M
a
r
y
B
l
a
i
n
e
a
n
d
P
a
t
t
y
C
h
a
r
n
a
s
1
1
/
1
3
/
1
7
a
n
d
11
/
1
4
/
1
7
.
16
3
S
1
8
.
4
0
.
3
1
0
R
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
i
e
r
c
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
'
s
c
o
d
e
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
.
5
-
d
a
y
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
t
i
m
e
p
e
r
i
o
d
a
n
d
1
0
-
d
a
y
re
s
p
o
n
s
e
p
e
r
i
o
d
i
s
l
i
m
i
t
i
n
g
.
16
4
S
1
8
.
3
0
C
l
a
r
i
f
y
m
e
a
n
i
n
g
o
f
n
o
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
l
o
t
s
i
z
e
i
n
T
a
b
l
e
6
-
1
,
C
h
.
1
8
.
3
0
.
D
o
e
s
n
o
t
m
a
k
e
s
m
a
l
l
l
o
t
s
"n
o
n
c
o
m
f
o
r
m
i
n
g
"
i
n
t
e
r
m
s
o
f
S
M
P
.