HomeMy WebLinkAboutHohRiverwetlandmitigationmemo_08-29-2017
Memorandum
DATE: August 29, 2017
TO: Steve Morrow
Environmental Protection Specialist
FHWA, Western Federal Lands
FROM: Gray Rand
Senior Scientist, PWS
SUBJECT: Conceptual Wetland Mitigation Plan
PROJECT: Upper Hoh River Road Bank Stabilization Project
PROJECT NO.: FHAX0000-0242
COPIES: File
INTRODUCTION
This memorandum describes proposed conceptual wetland mitigation for an estimated 2,679
square feet of long term temporary or permanent wetland impact for the Upper Hoh River Road
Project (project) proposed by the Western Federal Lands Highway Division of FHWA (WFLHD).
This conceptual mitigation plan has been prepared for use by several regulatory agencies,
including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), Washington State Department of Ecology
(Ecology), and Jefferson County, as well as interested parties, which may include tribes or
interested citizens. The proposed mitigation will be located near the west end of the proposed
project, near Site C1 (Figure 1). The following sections describe the major elements of the
conceptual mitigation plans.
At the 70 percent design level, there is an estimated 2,679 square feet of long term temporary and
permanent impacts to Category III wetland systems from the project. These wetland impacts are
associated with systems largely along the Hoh River Road. Portions of these wetlands are
associated with the road ditch and drainage system. The base mitigation ratios for Jefferson County
include a 2:1 ratio for impacts to Category III wetland systems (JCC 18.22.350). Therefore,
approximately 5,358 square feet of wetland creation would be required for compensatory
mitigation. Efforts to reduce the project impacts will occur as the project design is advanced.
Steve Morrow
August 29, 2017
Page 2
Figure 1. Conceptual Wetland Mitigation Site 1
Steve Morrow
August 29, 2017
Page 3
PROPOSED MITIGATION
Following completion of installation of Site C1 engineered log jams (ELJ), WFLHD would
construct a bench wetland (similar to Wetland 1) to provide compensatory mitigation for wetland
impacts per Jefferson County mitigation ratios (JCC 18.22.350). This potential mitigation site is
shown in Figure 2 below. This wetland would have the following characteristics:
Approximately 5,358 square feet in size
Hydrology supported by flow from Stream 9 and groundwater, encouraged by level flow
spreader, berms, or similar methods.
HGM = Riverine
Wetland would be protected from erosion by ELJs
Planted with local native wetland plants typically observed in adjacent wetlands:
o Slough sedge
o Skunk cabbage
o Lady fern
o Small-fruited bulrush
o Water parsley
o Red alder
o Salmonberry
o Western red cedar
o Sitka spruce
MITIGATION GOALS AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The proposed wetland mitigation is intended to replace wetland acreage and functions lost or
impacted by the proposed project.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The performance standards described below provide benchmarks for measuring achievement of
the goals and objectives of the mitigation site. Mitigation activities are intended to meet these
performance standards within a specified time frame. The mitigation site will be deemed
successful after achieving the approved performance standards described below in Table 1. A
baseline evaluation should be conducted and will represent a baseline of conditions after mitigation
is implemented (i.e. construction is competed). This Year 0 report provides a baseline to allow
comparison of performance for subsequent years. Results of annual monitoring in Years 1, 3, and
5 will be compared with these standards.
The following performance standards are based on conditions at and around the proposed
mitigation site. The forested nature of the site will influence suitable plants and expected density
of plant growth expected during the monitoring period. Methods to monitor each performance
standard are described in general terms.
Steve Morrow
August 29, 2017
Page 5
Wetland Hydrology
Performance Standard (Years 1, 3, 5)
Within all intended wetland areas, the soil will be saturated, or a water table will be present, within
12 inches of the soil surface for at least 30 consecutive days during the growing season in years
when rainfall meets or exceeds the 30-year precipitation average.
Native Herbaceous Species in the Wetland
Performance Standard (Year-1)
One hundred percent survival of all installed herbaceous plants one-year post installation of all
wetland restoration plants. At least three native herbaceous species will be present in the emergent
plant communities.
Performance Standard (Year-3)
Cover of native wetland herbaceous plant species (planted and volunteer) will be at least 30 percent
in the emergent communities. At least three native herbaceous species will be present in the
emergent plant communities.
Performance Standard (Year-5)
Cover of native wetland herbaceous plant species (planted and volunteer) will be at least 50 percent
in the emergent communities. At least three native herbaceous species will be present in the
emergent plant communities.
Year of Monitoring Percent Coverage
Year-3 30 percent
Year-5 50 percent
Native Trees and Shrubs in the Wetland
Performance Standard (Year-1)
One hundred percent survival of all installed native trees and shrubs one-year post installation of
all wetland restoration plants. At least two species of native tree and three species of native shrubs
will be present in the forested and scrub-shrub areas.
Performance Standard (Year-3)
Cover of native wetland trees and shrubs combined (planted and volunteer) will be at least 30
percent in the combined scrub-shrub and forested communities. At least two species of native trees
and three species of native shrubs will be present in the forested and scrub-shrub areas.
Performance Standard (Year-5)
Cover of native wetland trees and shrubs combined (planted and volunteer) will be at least 60
percent in the combined scrub-shrub and forested communities. At least two species of native trees
and three species of native shrubs will be present in the forested and scrub-shrub areas.
Steve Morrow
August 29, 2017
Page 6
Year of Monitoring Percent Coverage
Year-3 30 percent
Year-5 60 percent
Invasive Species
Performance Measure (Years 1, 3, and 5)
Washington State-listed or county-listed noxious weeds observed in any area of the mitigation site
must be eradicated. (Eradicating weeds means getting rid of the plants altogether, including plant
roots). All occurrences shall be reported to the site manager. Class B and C weed species
designated for mandatory control in Jefferson County include the following:
Yellow archangel (B) (Lamiastrum galeobdolon)
Scotch broom (B) (Cytisus scoparius)
Butterflybush (B) (Buddleja davidii)
Reed canarygrass (C) (Phalaris arundinacea)
Common fennel (B) (Foeniculum vulgare)
Knotweeds (B) (Polygonum spp.) (non‐native)
Poison hemlock (B) (Conium maculatum)
Tansy ragwort (B) (Senecio jacobaea)
Perennial sowthistle (C) (Sonchus arvensis)
Common teasel (C) (Dipsacus fullonum)
Ravenna grass (C) (Saccharum ravennae)
Designated noxious weeds or other species of concern will include less than 10% cover in all
intended wetland zones. Other weeds of concern include Himalayan blackberry, herb Robert,
English ivy, and Canada thistle.
Upland Buffer Vegetation Performance Criteria
Existing upland vegetation around the proposed mitigation area will be left intact with existing
vegetation. No buffer vegetation performance criteria are proposed.
Steve Morrow
August 29, 2017
Page 7
Table 1. Performance Standards
Performance Standards Monitoring Methods Monitoring
Intervals
1. Wetland Hydrologic Characteristics present Inundation at the soil surface or at least saturation
within 12 inches of soil surface at least 30
consecutive days during the growing season, in
years when rainfall meets or exceeds the 30-year
precipitation average.
Year 1, 3, 5.
2. 100% survival of all installed native
herbaceous plant one-year post installation
herbaceous plants.
Total plant count of all installed herbaceous plants Years 1
3. Annual monitoring for cover of all installed
herbaceous plants. Volunteer native
herbaceous plants in mitigation area will be
included.
herbaceous plant cover: 30% by Year 3,
50% by Year 5.
At least 3 native herbaceous plants shall be
present in the mitigation area
Percent cover of installed herbaceous plant shall be
measured by an approved monitoring technique
such as line intercept method and/or sample plots.
Tally species in restoration areas
Years 3, and 5
Years 1, 3 and 5
4. 100% survival of all installed native trees and
shrubs one-year post installation.
Total plant count of all installed trees and shrubs. Year 1.
5. Annual monitoring for cover of all installed
trees and shrubs. Volunteer native trees and
shrubs in the mitigation area will be
included.
Tree and shrub cover: 30% by Year 3, 60%
by Year 5.
At least 2 native tree species and 3 native
shrub species shall be present
Percent cover of installed trees and shrubs shall be
measured by an approved monitoring technique
such as line intercept method and/or sample plots.
Years 3 and 5
Years 1, 3 and 5
5. No more than 10% cover of non-native or
other invasives, e.g., Himalayan blackberry,
evergreen blackberry, reed canarygrass,
scots broom, English ivy, morning glory, etc.
Percent cover of non-native or invasive species
shall be measured by an approved monitoring
technique such as line intercept method and/or
sample plots.
Years 1, 3, and 5
Steve Morrow
August 29, 2017
Page 8
MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE
The wetland mitigation site will be monitored for a minimum of five years. Formal monitoring
procedures will be performed in years one, three, and five after initial acceptance of the mitigation
construction. The site should be evaluated for baseline conditions the summer following plant
installation to evaluate survival rates and document the presence of non-native invasive species. A
baseline monitoring report should document post construction conditions and characteristics.
Monitoring reports will be submitted to the Corps and Jefferson County for review and comment.
Monitoring reports will be completed by December of each monitoring year. Mitigation success
will be measured by the attainment of performance standards.
The actual monitoring methods used to monitor the site will be determined and documented in
annual monitoring reports.
CONTINGENCY PLAN
It is anticipated that the mitigation goals will be accomplished with the construction and
installation of the mitigation design as shown on the grading and planting plans. Contingency
actions, however, may be needed to correct unforeseen problems. Contingency revisions typically
require coordination with the permitting agencies.
As necessary, contingency measures (site management or revisions to performance criteria with
permitting agency agreement) will be implemented to meet performance measures and
performance standards. The following describes potential situations that may occur and the
potential contingencies that might be implemented to correct the problem. Because not all site
conditions can be anticipated, the contingencies discussed below do not represent an exhaustive
list of potential problems or remedies.
Hydrology
Hydrologic problems occurring on a mitigation site are typically the result of either insufficient
water or excessive water. Insufficient water can occur seasonally during drought conditions or can
be a long-term problem. Long-term problems can be the result of altered surface water flows for
mitigation sites reliant on surface water flows as the primary source of hydrology. For groundwater
driven mitigation sites, typical long-term hydrologic problems that result in either excessive or
insufficient hydrology can occur from a design based on insufficient groundwater data, th e
establishment of incorrect final grade elevations, or an unperceived soil condition that alters
groundwater flows. Hydrologic contingency measures will be implemented based on observed
conditions or monitoring data. Steps to address insufficient or excessive hydrology are:
Clearly identify the source of the problem.
Consult with the mitigation design team and the resource agencies to determine an
appropriate course of action.
Adjust elevations or install water management structures to achieve appropriate hydrologic
conditions.
Steve Morrow
August 29, 2017
Page 9
Vegetation
Problems related to vegetation include plant mortality, and poor growth resulting in low plant
cover. These problems could be the result of insufficient site management, particularly watering
in the first few growing seasons, animal browse, competition from invasive species, incorrect plant
selection, altered site conditions, and vandalism. Contingencies for plant mortality and poor plant
cover may include:
Plant replacement – Additional planting may be required to meet plant survival and plant
cover requirements. Plant species will be evaluated in relation to site conditions to
determine if plant substitutions will be required.
Weed control – Control of non-native invasive species may be required to meet survival
and plant cover requirements. Weed control methods could include mechanical or hand
control, mulching, or herbicide application.
Review and revise performance criteria with permitting agency agreement.
SITE MANAGEMENT
The applicant, or its agent, will manage the site annually for the first 5 years. Site management
activities shall include noxious weed control and may include mulching, fertilizing, supplemental
watering, maintaining access, correcting erosion or sedimentation problems, or litter pickup. The
first year of plant establishment includes supplemental water and care of all replacement plants
installed during the first year.
Enclosures: Conceptual Wetland Mitigation Plan