Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
BLD2013-00144
S"N Cr) DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4; 621 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend,WA 98368 Tel:360.379.4450 Fax:360.379.4451 Web:www.co.jefferson.wa.us/communitydevelopment 4gsf11 NO,s.O' E-mail:dcdaco.jefferson.wa.us CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY PERMIT#: BLD1 3-00144 APPLICANT: CHRISTOPHE CLEGG PHONE: 206-515-4902 NANCY SLOUGH 11215 2NDAVE NW SEATTLE WA 981774706 SITE ADDRESS: 915 KENS WAY Issue Date: 07/23/2013 QUILCENE, 98376 Final Date: 7/19/2018 SUBDIVISION: Block: Lot: PARCEL NUMBER: 601102012 Section: 10 Township: 26 N Range: 1W PROJECT DESCRIPTION: New SFR - Shoreline Exemption THE PROJECT LISTED ABOVE COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENT OF THE BUILDING CODE 2009 EDITION. OCCUPANCY GROUP: R-3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: 5N SPRINKLER SYSTEM THE PROJECT PASSED ITS FINAL INSPECTION AND RECEIVED FINAL SIGN OFF ON 7/19/2018 Acting Building Official, Patty Charnas \\tidemark\data Worms\F_BLD_Occupancy.rpt 8/7/2018 • BUILDING PERMIT • Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360)379-4450 FAX (360)379-4451 PERMIT #: BLD13-00144 Received Date: 5/14/2013 SITE ADDRESS: 915 KENS WAY Issue Date 7/23/2013 QUILCENE, 98376 Expiration Date 7/23/2014 OWNER: CHRISTOPHE CLEGG PHONE: 206-515-4902 NANCY SLOUGH 11215 2ND AVE NW SEATTLE WA 981774706 SUBDIVISION: Block: Lot: TX 20 PARCEL NUMBER: 601102012 Section: 10 Township: 26 N Range: 01 W CONTRACTOR: OWNER/BUILDER PHONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: New SFR - Shoreline Exemption TYPE OF WORK RES SQUARE FOOTAGE: TYPE OF IMP NEW MAIN: 1,500 VALUATION 350,000.00 ADD'L: HEAT TYPE EEE CODE EDITION: 2009 HEAT BASE: HEAT TYPE: OCCUPANCY. R-3 UNHEATED: #OF STORIES: OCCUPANCY: CONST TYPE: 5N OTHER: SHORELINE: GARA CONST TYPE: DECKLE 240 SETBACK: BANK HEIGHT: SEWAGE DISPOSAL: WATER SYSTEM: 2PARTYWELL Type Amount Paid By: Date: Receipt: BEDROOMS: BATHROOMS: Permit $2,393.75 CJZ 05/14/13 142079 Exist: Exist: Plan Check $1,555.94 CJZ 05/14/13 142079 Prop: 2 Prop: 2 State Building Code $4.50 CJZ 05/14/13 142079 Total: 2 Total: 2 Potable Water Application $66.00 CJZ 05/14/13 142079 Total: $4,020.19 Directions to Site: HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL REQUIRED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR ONE YEAR OR IT MUST BE PROPERLY RENEWED BUILDING INSPECTION HOT-LINE 379-4455. Request must be received by 3pm the day before the inspection is needed. Office Hours 9:00 am -4:30 pm MONDAY - THURSDAY HOT LINE AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY SPECIAL CONDITIONS APPLY - SEE ATTATCHED Jefferson County Building Dion Permit Nun.: BLD13-00144 Applicant: CLEGG BUILDING PERMIT INSPECTION APPROVALS Applicable Code: 2009 International Building Codes To schedule inspections, call (360)379-4455 no later than 3:00PM the day before the inspection is needed. Requests received after 3:00 PM will not be scheduled for the next day's inspections. ELECTRICAL PERMITS are issued by the Washington State Department of Labor& Industries. The electrical permit must be signed off by the State Inspector prior to the County's Framing Inspection Inspection Item Date Approval Signature Notes Setbacks Erosion Control Foundation Footing ilk, u-r6r( X Z B,-14-13 Footing Drains �/////3 if / �/�J` Foundation Stem Wall p3/L7J, Underground Plumbing Under Floor Framing 11'-2t — '� (47 Straps(hold downs) Ext. Shear Wall Nailing 1 b_ C_ Rough-in Plumbing Shower Pan N Framing 1-(1) Blocking PA Airseal TOY1-) ., r)Insulation:Walls "A*5 t) (IA �/ Insulation: Floors Insulation: Ceiling 3/ 4 14 Tc 1I Int. Shear Wall Nailing ""� 3�{4 Jc. .G., Wallboard Nailing 4 /26/l j / U Gas Line: Interior II J25 Gas Line: Exterior 11 V �I� ' ` T- 0,496_ I t-i L-3 Propane Tank 44IS Heat/Chimney Clearance 11.,A133 Wood/Pellet Stove �`�, Duct Test Cert Blower Airtight Test j/'e I d Smoke&CO2 Drywell/Alt Drainage / � � d k q�i/�i3 ," Address Posted Water Meter Inspection 3/24/14 • • FINAL INSPECTION . FINAL INSPECTION MUST BE APPROVED PRIOR TO BUILDING BEING OCCUPIED THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR ONE YEAR CONDITIONS for Building Permit# :B•13-00144 • 1.) The applicant shall comply with the recommendations contained in the submitted Geotech Report dated November 2012 prepared by NTI Engineering. 2.) A vegetative buffer of 50-feet shall be permanently maintained from the top or edge of the Landslide Hazard Area. All buffers shall be measured perpendicularly from the top of the Landslide Hazard Area. 3.) Landslide Hazard Areas and their associated buffers shall remain naturally vegetated. Should buffer disturbance occur during construction, the Unified Development Code (UDC)Administrator shall require replanting with native vegetation. No alterations shall be made to the Landslide Hazard Area or its associated buffer without prior authorization by the UDC Administrator. 4.) Prior to and during approved construction activities, the perimeter of the landslide hazard area buffer shall be marked with a temporary sign. The sign shall be placed in such a manner that it can be directly observed from the construction area. The sign shall contain the following statement: "Landslide Hazard Area and Buffer- Do not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation." 5.) All construction activities shall not encroach upon the landslide buffer. This includes the storage or preparation of materials. 6.) The applicant shall permanently separate the boundary of the Landslide Hazard Area Buffer from the remainder of the subject property through installing logs, trees, a hedge row, or any other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. 7.) The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater, erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater and drainage control systems. 8.) A Stormwater Plan has been submitted and approved by the Department of Community Development. Once the subject permit has been issued the applicant shall fully implement the provisions of the submitted plan. A Certificate of Occupancy will not be issued until the Department verifies plan compliance. No clearing for roadways or utilities shall occur on the project site until clearing necessary for the installation of temporary sedimentation and erosion control measures have been completed. 9.) The site plan as submitted with the Building Permit and Shoreline Exemption application on May 14, 2013 has been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated May 15, 2013 shall be resubmitted for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development. 10.) This project has been reviewed and approved as a Shoreline Exemption under JCC 18.25.090(5). 11.) The project is located within WRIA 17 and thus is subject to compliance with the WA State Department of Ecology In- Stream Flow Rule for that region. The parcel is located within the Toandos sub-basin in a designated Coastal Management Area; as such, state regulations require the following: 1. INSTALLATION OF A WATER METER, MEETING DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY SPECIFICATIONS, IS REQUIRED FOR ALL NEW USES THROUGHOUT THE WATERSHED. (WAC 173-517-180). BROCHURES WITH SPECIFICATIONS ARE ENCLOSED WITH THE PERMIT. Refer to enclosed documents for more INFORMATION; see Ecology web site at http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wr/instream-flows/quilsnowbasin.html or contact Ecology at 360-407-6300. \\tiriPmark\Hata\fnrmc\F RI n PPrmit Rlrin rnt 7/71/7f111 0144 • BUILDING PERMIT APPLIcI ION B Review Type: Type: Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 PERMIT#: BLD13-00144 Received Date: 5/14/2013 SITE ADDRESS: 915 KENS WAY QUILCENE, 98376 OWNER: CHRISTOPHE CLEGG PHONE: 206-515-4902 NANCY SLOUGH 11215 2ND AVE NW SEATTLE WA 981774706 SUBDIVISION: Block: Lot: TX 20 PARCEL NUMBER: 601102012 Section: 10 Township: 26 N Range: 01 W CONTRACTOR: OWNER/BUILDER PHONE: REPRESENTATIVE: PHONE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION New SFR TYPE OF WORK RES SQUARE FOOTAGE: TYPE OF IMP NEW MAIN: 1,500 VALUATION 350,000.00 ADD'L: HEAT TYPE: EEE CODE EDITION: 2009 HEAT BASE: HEAT TYPE: OCCUPANCY: R-3 UNHEATED: #OF STORIES: OCCUPANCY: OTHER: CONST TYPE: 5N GARAGE: SHORELINE: CONST TYPE: DECK: 240 SETBACK: BANK HEIGHT: SEWAGE DISPOSAL: WATER SYSTEM: BEDROOMS: BATHROOMS: Exist: Exist: Prop: 2 Prop: 2 Total: 2 Total: 2 Routing Date: Type Amount Paid By: Date: Receipt: Approved/Date Permit $2,393.75 CJZ 05/14/13 142079 Plan Check $1,555.94 CJZ 05/14/13 142079 ���ROVE D State Building Code $4.50 CJZ 05/14/13 142079 JUL 2 3 2013 Potable Water Application $66.00 CJZ 05/14/13 142079 Total: $4,020.19 Jefferson County DCD \\iirJomorL\rIn+n fnrrne Min Ann RIrJ rn+ G/1 C/7(11'1 IL 4$) c0e, JEFFER COUNTY • ,.,4 ' • I' DEPARTM OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT "7 .• '4 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend •Washington 98368 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax �.Q p) www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment S NCP. Master Permit Application MLA: Project Descciptiori(include separat sheets as necessary): iSc 4I Ni - . 4A l tj VGA.Ca,f t ) UtVwte.) 11eW Cvnns {1 ovi Tax Parrccel Property t, Number: t�D! "" 10 2 — 61 2.. Size: 1•W Ttt 4'6 (acres/square feet) Site Address and/or Directions to Property: 915 Kehl IS /1 QUI lcme-/ INA lfillov Property Owner(s)of Record: rim-A G � DIAAA. NANt Slow\1,1 Telephone: ��/"' 3(l — 1 S 68 �dxx ZDt/- ?,r 4 31 O email: S f J 5 N ('.oWtms{;V)ei Mailing Address: 12i 24 L Alm. (J W 5c t ,-G, IAA- 1 Q i 1} Applicant/Agent(if different from owner): Telephone: Fax: email: Mailing Address: What kind of Permit?(Check each box that applies Building 0 Variance(Minor,Major or Reasonable Economic Use) ❑ Demolition Permit 0 Conditional Use[C(a),C(d),or C)" Single Family ❑Garage Attached/Detached 0 Discretionary"D"or Unnamed Use Classification ❑ Manufactured Home ❑ Modular 0 Special Use(Essential Public Facilities)** ❑ Commercial* 0 Boundary Line Adjustment ❑ Change of Use ❑Short Plat** ❑ Address 0 Road Approach El Binding Site Plan** O Home Business ❑Cottagelndustry ❑Long Plat** ❑Propane ❑Planned Rural Residential Development(PRRD)/Amendments** ❑Sign 0 Plat Vacation/Alteration** Allowed"Yes"Use Consistency Analysis 0 Shoreline Master Program Exemption/Permit Revisions** Stormwater Management 0 Shoreline Management Substantial Development'* Site Plan Approval Advance Determination(SPAAD)* 0 Shoreline Management Variance Temporary Use 0 Comprehensive Plan/UDC/Land Use District Map Amendment Wireless Telecommunication' 0 Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Amendment Forest Practices Act/Release of Six-Year Moratorium ❑Tree Vegetaion Request *May require a Pre—Application Conference **Requires a Pro-Application Conference Please identify any other local,state or federal permits required for this proposal, if known: r DESIGNATION OF AGENT I hereby designate .4li to act as my agent in matters relating to this application for permit(s). OWNER SIGNATURE .G. Date: ��" By signing this application form, wner/agent att s that the information provided herein,and in any attachments,is true and correct to the best of his,her or it's knowledge. Any terial falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the owner/agent with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. 1 further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments,court costs,reasonable attomey's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and its employees,representatives or agents for the sole purpose of application review and any re d later inspections. Staffs access and right of entry will be assumed unless the applicant informs the County in writing at the time of the apple at' at he or she rior otice. Signature: Date: ,�r-��J—�1 The action or actions licant will unde e as a result of the issuance of this permit may negatively impact upon one or more threatened or endangered species could lead to a potential"take"of an endangered species as those terms are defined in the federal law known as the "Endangered Species Act"or"ESA."Jefferson County makes no assurances to the applicant that the actions that will be undertaken because this permit has been issued will not violate the ESA. Any individual,group or agency can file a lawsuit on behalf of an endangered species regarding your action(s)even if you are'n compliance with the Jefferson County development code.The Applicant acknowledges that he,she or it holds individual and non-transfer I sponsibility for he' to and complying with the ESA. The Applicant has read this disclaim `and si 2nns and dates it below. Signature: Date. r / "�j - Il C:\Documents and Settings)\carat\Local Setting\Temporary Internet Files\CtLK86\Master Permit Application 12-19-2006.doc MAY 1 /-�r 2013 JEFFERSON COUNTY Rd k BUILDER STATEMENT The signer of this statement does herebyy that they are the Owners of the parcel referenced here!ll!hat they are not licensed contractors and that they will be assumi sponsibility of Hera ntractor for the proposed project.. � Signature: Date: -J — /_// �/ GENERAL CONTRACTOR MANUFACTURED OME INSTALLER: PHONE: FAX: s to ( ) ( ) MAILING ADDRESS: EMAIL: CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE WAINS NUMBER: NUMBER ARCHITECT/ENGINEER: / i,tCj PHONE (1Cfp) �� 11 -FAx:( ) MAILING ADDRESS: V) Vjine 54.1 - 'i,1$ s ZA9' EMAIL Project Type: Frame Type: Bathrooms: r-fistSewer of Shoreline: Type of Sewage Disposal: �C New jxWood Existing: Addition Steel Proposed: Bank Community System Alteration/Remodel Concrete Total: Height:•/ Individual System Repair Masonry ���I S P Permit# Demolition Other: Bedrooms: Water Supply: Existing: Setback: Private well DC Two Party T_yp e o Heat: Proposed: �,_ ��/ Public U7✓ sc., 2- Name of System: If this is a Commercial Protect you must answer the following: Number of Parking Spaces: Current: Proposed: Number of ADA Parking Spaces: Number of occupants(includes owners,tenants,employees,etc) Current Proposed IBC Occupancy: IBC Type of construction: Will you have Food Service? Yes / No If this is a Propane ank and/or Appliance Installation permit,mark all items below that appi ❑Underground Tank bove ground Tank Sze Sze9f Propane Tank: 24) ❑Heat Stove Cook Stove 0 Woodstove 0 Fireplace Insert Hot Water Tank 0 Pellet Stove 0 Other Is this appliance being installed in a Manufactured I Mobile Home? Yes / No When applying for a permit to Install a propane tank you must also submit a site plan showing all of the buildings,all property lines,tank location and size,distances from the propane tank to all property lines,buildings and septic system components, Including the reserve area. Square Footage Current Proposed For Office Use Only Amount Revision Main Floor Heated 1900 13 IRS 9 H Bid App Review: 2na Floor Heated .. �✓ Consistency Review: , -s Other Heated — Base fee: 3g3-I Mezzanine SOP Ex ion: 53 a �,..,pd�'rsr� Heated Basement Plan Check fee: Unheated Basement State Surcharge fee: 4 so Ott "-`---J -- -- Pot Water Review fee: 1 i O o I. Garage/Carport - SUBTOTAL I4 9951.15. Dec Cacti e - 'ID 4qee 911/Rd Approach fee: N!'r Other • 140-4 1- g /,g TOTAL: $ { _ Receipt Number: t CI Cash/Check Number: / 1 ESTIMATEQCOSTIREQUIRED)` Date: .Fair et value of all labor and materials ()dation to finish I+'3 — 3 3 5-- I 0 b eD Initials: CADocuments and Settings\caral\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\(>I..K8G\Master Permit Application 12-19-20O6.dcc JfEEERSON ClitINIY uLli ` Up Front Parcel Revieve Parcel 601102012 Printed: May 15, 2013 CHRISTOPHE CLEGG Site Address: NANCY SLOUGH 915 KENS WAY 11215 2ND AVE NW SEATTLE, WA 981774706 QUILCENE WA, 98376 Parcel Number: 601102012 S-T-R: 10-26N-01W TotalAcreagc 2 Legal Description S 10 T26 R1 W TAX 20 WITH& SUBJ TO EASE Land Use: 9100 Flood District: Fire District: 2 Planning Area: Flood Map(FIRM) Panel No: School District 48 Zoning: R_G-- COMP PLAN DESIGNATION: COMMUNITY PLAN: UGA: UGA Trans [ ' Plot plan states "property line" [ 4 Assessor's Map (Property line n ubmitted plot plan must match the property lines as identified on the Assessor's 1/4 map) [ 0 Legal Access to Property YES NO [ tom}- Parcel Tags or Scanned Documents OP NO S,D k-c / [k..f ESA's: Special Reports Nearby YES '• [ 1,r Designated Ag YES NO [V]" Shoreline Designation NO ( /1 [ ] Shoreline Slope Stability: 0 NO c� -ems t i E, 3-5(.i: Stream Type:YES NO Fish & Wildlife:YEs NO Wetlands NO lt, Rare Plants:Y S NO SeismicSeismic•daW NO Landslid,s�•� NO itA(0 ;)---( � C (.J Flood: YES NO — U Erosion: YES NO Aquifer Recharge Are .Y-E)NO - SIPZ: none At Risk High Risk Coastal CMZ: none High Risk Moderate Ris ':' connected CMZ Stormwater site plan sue is itted: YesNo [(4- Forest Lands: YES NO Adjoining Forest Lams: Commercial/ Rural/ Inholding [ -r Mineral Lands: YES �l [ [A-- Agricultural Lands: YES e 0• [(Ar- Archaeology: YES , Li i Stormwater: New Impervious Surface and n1 g ctivity (0l L� ESA's Stormwater Req's:Min Req#2 Min Rh#1 thru#5 Min Req#1 thru#10 ngmeerin [ lif Notice Provisions/Disclosur-. -:.'T YES NO MRL YES NO Fores an S YES NO [ Landscaping Required: Yes o [ Parking Spaces Re• ' ed NO Other f (/1' Building Height: INII UBC Standard [ ]. Impervious Surface covee percentage: Resource Lands&Public: Rural Residential: 25% Rural Aerial: Per UDC Sec 6.7 Rural Commercial: 60% Area of Building Coverage: 60%in Rural Industrial Lands only [ v] Total Building (s) Size: RVC:20,000 SF CC: 5,000 SF NC: 7,500 SF G 0,000 SF All others:subject to septic&water constraints/N pecified [ ►/V Setbacks: Front: 2 ) Left Side: Right Side: 4 Rear: 47) Shoreline Setback: LSHA Setback: [Vf Road Classification: [ � Road Approach: NOT REQ'D RAP SEPA Required: YES .xEMPT [ -J Flood Certificate: [ Existing Case(s) & Condition(s): Violations: Yes No [✓] Recorded Date of Subdivision: AFN Over 5yrs=UDC Plat Conditions: <5yrs=Plat Conditions on plat or Old Ordinance [ 1,,}7- Lots/Require Declaration of Restrictiv venant YES L2�itbmitted: YES NO [ ` UGA No Protest Agreement YES____ submitted: YES NO [ vr Site Visit conducted YES I [ Require Final Zoning Approval YES �I [ i/]- ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan case / YES New Parcel Tags entered in ermit Plan Li/AiYES Special Reports Scanned N YES No parcel tags found for parcel Cases Associated with APN 601102012 Cases Name Review Type Status Planner BLD13-00144 CLEGG P Application Received: 5/14/2013 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: New SFR M LA10-00142 PRJ10-00134 MLA10-00142 CLEGG P Application Received: 5/3/2010 Permit Issued/Case closed: Case Finaled: SDP10-00056 MLA10-00142 CLEGG I A Application Received: 5/3/2010 Permit Issued/Case closed: 6/16/2010 Case Finaled: SHORELINE EXEMP 1 ION 1-ON SEPTIC SYSTEM SEP10-00033 MLA10-00142 CLEGG I A Application Received: 4/13/2010 Permit Issued/Case closed: 7/13/2010 Case Finaled: SEP06-200 (expired) now filed here. SEP06-00200 CLEGG C Application Received: 6/20/2006 Permit Issued/Case closed: 10/9/2006 Case Finaled: EXPIRED & filed w/ SEP10-33 \\tidemark\data\forms\R_Parcel_CRMLA.rpt 5/15/2013 Page 2 of 2 I , I 3 I 4 I 5 V I e I 7 I 6 I 9 I 10 - \\A > ''\f .4 ,c__ ' cy - < C.) ----.. . Th---N -----) \i 6 T,h.., c, \_7 ,J t,.,, ,\‘,,,, , \,_ „, -----„\\ ...„,*„._,,,,,,,,,„--u, � � ,.. -- 1,-,., .‘,...N.N y . , -,\ ___ , _,_ 1 /ff , ..„, N., 1 N„,...... ..... ,,,, ,....,, , 114Wite s'::-.--.._-1=-. rn 4 a --\S I tit . . -----.. lito.„,esse --...,_ ,_ _ , ,---% 101„. . ...,..... ._ .. , ,4L, "\____. ..-. , ,iii:I/ ,....,:i (\sc...:,4, .4:-.,,,..,_- _,.„------- -, ,,,,,, ,--e—..- ,. it Appos.,,, _ fr:_____,, viir, ......,,,, a *111P \ '.44119p..h. ------:\'''' , ,, • - -.,.:-A.. 7_, M lit ..,:-Aft.1.4-0- , _ -I' ' :110 Pltik'N' "a'.-44.14/p075- --t: r., IV 0 " -*- ftt? '' ,,,,,-1 --j3 'N ': , .po \ g :1 4:., '_c 3. t;< J1c' - - w Z roil I: ' I .441t4, \, lailiiii4miftliii,ii•-• itimitaift , m f -.. , „,,,\) ,(--- 103: ,(42.tz,„..—.4414 -- , -0 _ .......„ 0 ,N,, 0 __'1,--. 1 • ii,--Arre4 ' ' 7._ - .-Ami r::,,512/z5VV7A__ _ 11r"i .ice ��' ail -- -- ^ 1c` rw Nr _it to . aAel'ii _ i 141 .141,4,g 1 '\:-.Z.\:\ 1 .,'. ,! . 7 -: 411 IIII :7 ---S _ / Fri.0� .... f:l \ 0 „ . ..\?,_ -Jr- -- - d.... 1 ot //-'' c ....4_4/ ) ) . T_ I / c. ,._., \.,, ,.:\.,- ,t-- 4p" _ ,!,,,:, , ,;.:/// z I L .. / t • g, IP IA J _ — _.jiliatitArk _ 3' �► ,„„„iii.mis- ---,.. 1.1ter -te11ice ;! ce l —f G:1s,\PROJECiLMEC1201 Qearinl Cap. andslide Hazard\Drainage&Erosion Corawl PI DWGINTI-2007-CL£C1201-DRAINAGE.dwg .SYM. VISION UAIE DATE: Jnnunry 7,2013 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN N.) 1 SCALE: AS SHOWN / '4, N i l ENGINEERING IF OW & SURVEYING r DESIGNED BY: KLR 717 SOUTH PEABODV STREET O ^� JEFFERSON COUNTY, WA T DRAWN AY:KLR y • PORT ANGELES,WA 98362 1' WWW.NTI4U.COM P:(360)452-8491 CJl CHECKED: JCW NT, F:(360)452-8498 FOR : CHRIS CLEGG - REVIEW:JCW V . • • 1 l 4 -!' GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS AND REPORT Prepared For Christopher Clegg& Nancy Slough November 2012 For the Property Described As Jefferson County Tax Parcel # 601102012 Northwest Quarter of Section 10,Township 26 North, Range 1 West, W.M. Jefferson County, Washington Prepared By: Trent T.Adams, EIT Steve S. Luxton, PE R ECEivpo NTI ENGINEERING &LAND SURVEYING 717 South Peabody Street11111t. 1- MAY <• Port Angeles, WA 98362 4 2013 Phone: (360)452-8491 Fax: (360)452-8498 Email: infoPnti4u.com J,fFFFRSON COUNJ' Df i Website:www.nti4u.com • • • NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, INC. '&111:4 f 71?SOUTH PEABODY STREET,PORT ANGELES,WA 96362 Enginetrs❑Land Sunrayrors 3 Gaobogfsts Construction impaction Mfetarrats Tasting Phone(360)452-8491 1-800-654-5545 Fax 452-8498 :infoenti4u.corn November 20, 2012 Christopher Clegg& Nancy Slough 11215 2nd Avenue NW Seattle,WA 98177 Subject: Geotechnical Report for Tax Parcel#601102012,915 Kens Way, Quilcene,WA. Located within the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 26N, Range 1W,W.M.,Jefferson County,WA Dear Mr. Clegg and Others Concerned, SUMMARY OF FINDINGS We believe that the proposal to construct a single family residence at the subject waterfront site will pose no unreasonable threat to persons or property nor lead to a decrease in slope stability if the recommendations of this report are thoughtfully observed. 1.0 BACKGROUND AND SCOPE OF WORK NTI Engineering and Land Surveying(NTI)was requested by property owner, Mr.Christopher Clegg,to perform a geotechnical analysis and report concerning Jefferson County Parcel#601102012.The property lies in the Northwest Quarter of Section 10,Township 26N, Range 1W,W.M.,on the Toandos Peninsula near Coyle,Washington. Jefferson County mapping lists the parcel as having a "slight"to "high" geologic hazard due to a steep marine bluff and mapped land-sliding on the marine bluff to the west facing Dabob Bay. In Jefferson County building setbacks from the rim of marine bluffs are required to be determined by a geologist or geotechnical engineer with experience in assessment of geologic hazards.The County also requires that undisturbed vegetative buffers be defined and delineated for each site that adjoins a steep slope or bluff. Mr. Clegg plans to use the parcel to develop a single family residence so attention was given to positioning the house with respect to the marine bluff.Additional work was carried out to determine foundation design parameters for the proposed structures.Work also included recommendations on drainage of stormwater and a brief assessment of the proposed location for wastewater facilities upslope of the proposed house site. 1 • • 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The site is located at 915 Kens Way, approximately 0.6 miles west of its intersection with Old Coyle Road, southeast of Quilcene, Washington. Note the map of the parcel and its relationship to Kens Way below in Figure 1. A driveway extends from the eastern property line approximately 250 feet to the west, with a downward slope to the west at approximately 15 to 20 degrees from horizontal. Beyond the driveway, within the middle one third of the site, much of the area has been cleared of trees and is now vegetated mostly with grass and shrubs. 601102010 601102017 / 601102007 �,�.- 601102015 W 11020P1 �.f 0:'7tYi 6p1102015 6p1tp2006� 60/102013Atit \ 60.102002\ , 601102005 . : PROJECT f VICINITY 60.,w=0, 601102006 2 66*/03003 a 1 601/05014 is k to",y,'1 .... 11r. 601/05013 601/04003 ! 601103012 2 _ 6011�12 t 601103011 3, ....,+r NensWay " 8 FIGURE 1—VICINITY MAP OF SITE At this site,the marine bluff is approximately 100 feet in height with steep, but variable slopes ranging from 40 to more than 60 degrees from horizontal.The bluff is moderately vegetated in mature Douglas fir trees and alder trees with an understory of shrubs and many sword ferns. 3.0 SITE GEOLOGY AND THE SOILS AT THIS SITE 3.1 Surficial Soil Types The Soil Conservation Service(SCS)Soil Survey classifies the local soils as follows: 2 • • LOCATION The upper third of the property as Cassolary-Kitsap complex The middle third of the property as Dabob very gravelly sandy loam The lower third of the property as Cassolary sandy loam According to the SCS,The Cassolary-Kitsap complex soils(noted as CkC below) were formed in a combination of reworked glacial and marine sediments on upland terraces. Runoff of the soil is listed as slow to medium and the hazard of water erosion is moderate.This soil is listed as moderately well drained to well drained. Permeability is said to be moderately slow to slow. ' > ` *l • 4 # " 1- I. 41 "t116/14‘.CFP:itit?' 6: • '' 6 . It� +- rw PROJECT ` i r 4VRJNITY I ‘ -- - • 4' ‘.. 04,01 ik4,._, ... w .,,,„ 1....t. V t is. . , . 16 i ► i lr' µ iiillik • <41,04,4 .1144:41 010 ..., t iit .15‘ —11,, lir t. • ,. . sit FIGURE 2—SOIL TYPES AT THE SITE (SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE) The Coastal Zone Atlas of Washington (Department of Ecology) and other geologic mapping describes the soil in the area of the property as Pre-Fraser undifferentiated glacial deposits(Qpf). 3.2 Field Observations at the House Site and the Bluff's Geology Field observations confirmed the presence of the Cassolary Kitsap gravelly sand at the proposed house site.These gravelly sands were deposited as advance outwash of the Vashon Glaciation about 15,000 to 20,000 years ago.Warping of the bedding of gravel seams in the sandy outwash suggest that these deposits have been reworked by repeated glacial retreats and advances and by very slow slumping to the west. The lowest portion of the bluff contains pre-Vashon sediments as suggested by the Coastal Zone Atlas. (Cassolary sands were not observed below the proposed house site.) Dense pre-Vashon cemented 3 • • gravel with silt was examined in an outcrop at the toe of the bluff directly below the house site. Other exposures near the toe of the bluff displayed dense pre-Vashon gravelly silt. Directly below the house from about 20 to 70 feet above high water at the beach, a colluvium of loose gravelly sand and slide debris covers the slope.The slide debris has a slow, but persistent downslope motion (creep)as a result of cyclic water saturation and frost heave, but deeply rooted trees have found more stable materials at depth.At about 75 feet above the beach, a 10 foot high head-scarp marks the cusp of a recent slide event on the bluff.The head-scarp provided an exposure of the underlying gravelly sand with silt that was moderately dense at the surface outcrop. Additional observations were made along a beach access track/trail lying a few hundred feet south of the critical bluff section below the proposed house site. Exposures of soil in the old road cuts showed a variety of consolidated earth materials including silty gravels,weathered siltstone similar in appearance to Twin River siltstone and dense gravelly silt.The dense and stable condition of these sediments suggests that all of these older deposits were over-ridden and consolidated by earlier glaciers. 3.3 Other Geotechnical Indicators Regarding the Bluff Field work included a reconnaissance of the nearby region on the north and south of the subject property along the bluff's rim. No large block slides or deep seated rotation slides were noted in a traverse of about 800 feet to the north along a trail linking the several cottages and houses there. Foundations of those structures did not show cracks that would have occurred if soil motion was in progress. No large slides were observed on the south although some slumping was evident in the upper and lowest part of the sandy soils along the old road cut south of the site.Side looking radar images (lidar)of the region do not show evidence of larger scale soil motion. Exposure of the bluff's toe to wind-driven longshore drift at Dabob Bay is moderate at the site.The backshore area has formed into a broad sandy beach.The accumulation of sand at this reach of shoreline suggests the toe of the bluff is not heavily scoured by longshore drift here.There was no significant over-steepening of the toe of the bluff below the proposed house site due to the protection provided by the backshore beach below the proposed site. No zones of excessive ground water seepage or springs were evident on the bluff or in the vicinity. A natural drainage swale crosses the southerly part of the subject property. Drainage from that swale has not resulted in significant erosion at the bluff.This suggested that the site is not wholly underlain by the unconsolidated sand found in test pits at the proposed house site. 3.4 Conclusions Concerning Bluff Stability and Landslide Hazard Due to the relatively high strength of the pre-Vashon deposits which appear to underlie the bluff and the apparent absence of exess groundwater,this site appears to be free from large and dangerous rotational slides that can produce instabilities far from the bluff's rim. A significant translational slide occurred on the bluff directly below the proposed house site in recent years. Slide debris from that event is still in motion on the slope.This slide has over-steepened a section of the bluff about 75 feet above the beach to a near-vertical condition.As a result of this geometry,the 4 • • uppermost part of the bluff appears to be vulnerable to a sudden translational slide.Such a slide event could result in a 30 foot adjustment of the bluff's rim, bringing it back roughly to the line of an existing narrow path. Once such a slide occurred,there would probably be a long interval of erosion before another slide advanced into the property due to the only moderate rate of talus scouring at the bluff's toe.The bluff is too steep and too active to support a trail to the beach. 3.5 Recommendations on Bluff Setback and Landslide Hazard Buffer A total setback of 85 feet from the steel fence post set on the north line of the parcel to the nearest line of the permanent foundation is recommended. Additional setback for improved safety and peace of mind is desirable at this site. Light exterior decks may extend another 16 feet toward Dabob Bay within that recommended setback. Due to the erosional mechanisms occurring here, an undisturbed vegetated buffer can add significantly to the stability of this bluff and add to the life span of the proposed house at this site. Fir and cedar trees on the slope and those at the slope's rim make important contributions to the stability of the uppermost section of the escarpment and they should be protected. An undisturbed buffer of native plants should be established in a zone that is 50 feet in width from the rim of the bluff at this parcel. Evergreen huckleberry has done well at this site and it is an attractive and useful plant for erosion control that could be planted in the previously disturbed portion of the buffer within the parcel.This slope and buffer area will support additional Douglas fir trees and they could be added to provide a significant enhancement to long-term slope stability.The buffer and the slope itself should remain naturally vegetated and undisturbed except for the possible planting of additional native plants. To encourage the long-term recognition of the landslide hazard buffer,the boundary of the buffer area should be marked with a permanent physical separation.This buffer separator might consist of logs,a row of trees, a hedgerow of shrubs, a low fence, or other prominent physical marking. 4.0 GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION 4.1 Scope of Foundation Subsurface Exploration Test pits were dug and logged at the proposed building site to provide foundation design parameters. Three test pits of up to 5 or 6 feet in depth were excavated at the site.An operator with a min-excavator was tasked with excavating the soils to expose the subsurface conditions for analysis. Soil was also examined at the wastewater drainage test pits about 100 feet northeast of the building site. 4.2 Test Pit Excavation Three test pits were excavated at the subject property within the vicinity of the proposed single family residence(Figure 3). Excavation was performed to a depth of approximately 6 feet,where a laer of dense gravelly sand was observed. 5 i • :144,�,y� • i z ♦ • rr, • t f`t Y > , 4 t,` „\ r•,.i. .M l , ; eas 4_ t/Fr; �, A . , ' ',. .° y:itta -,A 1~ ....,: Ste', r �.. 111-1:-::.,--l'.14:i.,::)4e :Al.:1::,i.'_' ► ` ,L ' tsilr �` • t ii .,irE` 1 # , K, :�.r �` ,;�,, s s t,,vre-t•,;A'''.17:71f4 1'--:'' -' Y *..4nf. - ;'' .ems it Ii— rl j4 ,, < � , �((i l s 4 r -4, ., Sul ys ;may i i� 3. (‘ , "�'� - OSZ FIGURE 3—EXCAVATION OF TEST PITS 4.3 Test Pit Soil Observations Data from the three test pits at the subject property showed the following generalized soil section in the uppermost 6 feet: SOIL PROFILE AT THE PROPOSED HOUSE SITE DEPTH SOIL OBSERVED Upper 12 inches - Loose,dark brown,gravelly sand loam 12 inches to 2.5 feet - Loose, orange-brown,gravelly sand with silt and clay 2.5 feet to 6 feet - Loose to medium dense, brown, gravelly sand with silt Below 6 feet - Increasingly dense, brown,gravelly sand with silt 4.4 Occurrence of Groundwater The geotechnical exploration was performed on November 14, 2012 near after a prolonged summer drought at the beginning of the wet season. Groundwater was not encountered during site exploration. However, soluble iron water stains in Test Pit#1 suggested a seasonal high water table at 4 feet in depth down from the ground surface. 6 • 0 5.0 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 Preparation of Subgrade Soils Excavation for footings should be at least 3 feet in depth, so that footings will be placed on the medium dense layer of gravelly sand at that depth. Prepare footing substrate by energetic compaction of the sandy soil. If wet or soft soils are encountered, notify the undersigned Engineer. 5.2 Recommendations for Foundation Design The sloping terrain at the location of the proposed single family is well suited for construction of daylight basement structures.This design gains from the depth of footing embedment and anchorage at the back line of the structure where the soil is the most stable and dense. Continuous footings to carry the foundation loads should be installed to a depth of at least 3 feet below the existing ground surface. Footings at least 2 feet in width placed on soils prepared as described above at depths of 3 feet or more may be designed using the criteria below. 5.3 Recommendations for Soil Bearing Capacity DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR FOUNDATIONS Soil Description - Loose to moderately dense gravelly sand Soil Unit Weight - At least 110 pounds per cubic foot Vertical Bearing Capacity - 2,500 pounds per square foot Lateral Bearing Capacity - 150 PSF Per Foot of Depth Coefficient of Friction - 0.25 Expected Differential Settlement - Less than 1"for footing subgrade prepared as noted Daylight basements of concrete should be fully waterproofed on the outside and carefully inspected during construction. Foundation drain pipes should not be installed carelessly with up and down runs. Instead,foundation drains should be installed below any floor or crawlspace ground level and they should have a straight-line lay with a continuous fall to daylight.This work should be inspected. 6.0 STORMWATER AND TREATED WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT 6.1 Site Classification under Puget Sound Stormwater Regulations Stormwater management in Jefferson County is regulated by the 2005 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology. Under the manual's guidelines for stormwater management,this project falls under the criteria for"New Development".The proposed 1,500 square-foot single family residence and an approximately 4,300 square foot driveway leads to a total of 5,800 square feet of new and or replaced impervious surface. 7 • • This meets the criteria of a "medium" project, and thus Minimum Requirements#1 through#5 that are described in the manual should be implemented. Planning documents for stormwater management are provided in the Appendix of this report.An engineered drainage and erosion control plan should be prepared by a licensed professional to address these requirements. NTl can complete the above- mentioned requirements for stormwater management, if requested. To reduce slope stability hazard,the driveway at site might be cross graded so that the runoff from the driveway is routed to the south to an existing swale and drainage route. Runoff reaching that swale might be detained by a series of drainage check dams for stormwater detention and some biofiltration along the route thus reducing erosion and impacts. 6.2 Drainage Facilities Observations of the sandy soils show that there is significant soil saturation at times and treated wastewater infiltration will add to the volume of shallow groundwater. With consideration to the shallow groundwater table,the site is suited for either downspout dispersion trenches or a drainage tightline to the bluffs toe to manage stormwater runoff.These options are discussed below. 6.2.1 Downspout Dispersion System To reduce the hazard of slope instability and to reduce stress on the slopes below,the construction of a downspout dispersion system using gravel-filled trenches is feasible.The dispersion method slows down the entry of runoff into the conveyance system, allows for some infiltration, and provides some water quality benefits. From the outlet of a dispersion trench, a vegetative flow path of at least 50 feet of undisturbed native landscape would be necessary. 6.2.2 Drainage Pipe To The Bluff's Toe Recommended At This Site To reduce the hazard of slope instability and to reduce stress on the slopes below, the construction of a storm drainage pipe to the toe of the slope is recommended.A fused (field welded) polyethylene pipe with high tensile capacity can be set up to provide a permanent drainage route for stormwater from rooftops and exterior paved areas adjoining the house. 6.3 Treated Wastewater Management We recommend that all wastewater system components and drainfields be at least fifty feet from the rim of the bluff, well behind the slope buffer. The proposed site for the drainfield lies at the northeast portion of the parcel about 100 feet east of the house.That site is free from geologic hazards in our opinion. Our observations suggest that there is sufficient soil and infiltrative capacity there to sustain a treated wastewater drainfield and the position of the drainfield,far from the bluff's rim, is desirable. 7.0 OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS Avoid underground water pipes that may be broken leading to large discharges of water to the soil that could lead to bluff instability.The use of 200 pound per square inch pressure rated polyethylene black 8 • • pipe for water service is suggested.That pipe has substantial tensile capacity and it will not easily split or crack. 8.0 LIMITATIONS This report applies only to the described property and it is for the exclusive use of the owners for development guidelines relating to the planned residential development at the time of the report.The site analysis and development recommendations of this report are not transferable to the adjoining or nearby properties. This report is based upon surface and a few subsurface observations of the site and the adjoining areas. The limited study was done without the benefit of deep borings or careful measurements taken over time. Recommendations contained in this report are based upon site conditions as they existed at the time of our site exploration, and available records and data from NTI and public sources. During construction, if subsurface or other conditions are discovered that are significantly different from those described in the report, NTI should be advised at once so that we can review the conditions and reconsider our recommendations. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on sites containing complex glacial or fluvial geology. Such unexpected conditions may require that additional expenditures be made to attain a properly constructed project.We recommend that a contingency be established in the project budget and schedule to cover unexpected conditions. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget,this report,the related field work and the recommendations herein were conscientiously completed in accordance with the principles of geotechnical science and in conformance with the professional practice of engineering. NTI provides no other warranty, neither express, nor written, herewith. Please contact NTI Engineering& Land Surveying if you have any questions regarding the content of this report. Sincerely yours, 4,79etr i • • �����of wn s yltic�pIA j // Ic 23767 IONAL ,, (/.'. Steve S. Luxton, PE Trent T.Adams, E.I.T Senior Geotechnical Engineer Project Manager 9 oo. io SI2:1H0 • elOd 0848-ZS4(OOC)'d /IN MOr:M31A3H 1009-ZS4(09C)A M0r :03NO3H0 in J �../(�/� {Y07l411N'MMM X VM `AiNnoO NOSH d3r YM'S3139NY12iOd 211N AB NMYtlO 133211S A009Y3d H1f10S LtL � J�� 2f1N A9 03NOIS30 Q JNIA9A�If1S ' � NMOHSSY :3lYaS NV1d IN3W3JdNb'W 2131b'MW?�OlS ON12�33MON3 tIN 31Y0 NOISIA3d WAS '~'W •1 C104'4 Arenuer .31Y0 N 6.9 3'JVNIVdO-lOZt03T3-490Z111,119MOWeId I04uo0 uasa3 y efeutm,plaleH eP9sWel 49ede0 6uueee Lon 0310LL03r02ldwoo0.0 1 J . • Z I i �l O / _ _T_f . , ) i _ 1 r . r' n ' , I \\I' `' f, t 4 fIh t 1 E 4 Ya V �^ I • t ''''''Ar4'''*cwo.,.. ..j.*! I i "4 i 21 t i f( ,ttt .. , I +1 1�) I ' s I . . I ifir • C9 --N-----41 ' i w ems ` co O `3 N... W Ig N O o Q I. Q. 'CC O O N z W W Z Z ? QQ � � i `� Q jWo ° p � Q C.) N W Z O p N � v � q� Ct O � ct � Q (n rn C) z m zwW �) eC m N t� St- W W � Q � � cL O W a J O Ct et- C� Cam) © (i) Cr) 4.1LI000 OI ) I--- I-- Q ct FO LLI � Nct z . W CD C m ram^ O `-� 1 ~ Lu CC O 4 ..- of. i 6 i 9 ) L i 9 1 s 1 4 ) C I z 1 L 4 003-0 SIHHO : HOd /1N MOf:M31A321 8699-Z99(09E):d L649-Z94(090:d MOf 03NO3HO J WOO'I1411N'MMM Z9C96 VM'S313ONV 12JOd • 21-1H:A8 NMV21❑ VM Jl1NnOO Nos213dd3r 13333211SAOOO9V3dd H1f1OS7LLL 0 O JN1�7nn LL s 6 ';, 21-1N :A803NOIS30 NV1d lNdWdJVNVIN Ha1VMW2�O±S ONI2i33NION3 I1N T: NMOHSSY 31V0S L-- �y £LOZ'2.Aeouef 31V0 31V0 NOISIA321 'WAS 1, 6m13 30VNIV210-LOZLO31O-LOOZ-I1MOMOWeld I0I000 OO1.0a V e6eu/1e,0\WezeH epllepuel tjpedeo 6`upee9 LOZLO310\j33r0Nd\ue0\:0 -. -� - .-,"'",--/ __ RIMSr:: Cr, :' At,.. . - - il .......10,- • © w b ® / -- /i _ o \a, _ __I_-_---.0i i./,1/.4i,_t-,:..--4N.--.;-..,,1.„ 6 _J 010\..pil r , t'\ 1 ,___\_ 1_ _ __1.I4 . c _.f.x_....,,. iTyi i\iN1 Y 1 :��, , I d o / n�i r 1 _____ .f 4 ' I IkL \\ i ----- 1 _441100‘ii if 411P.- - _ i \--\‘, --111 Rete:S°c/0 J 5:3-r ' `,asp _ // O ``� W j __ii ------- - 1%,( ilk 7) , \ I LLJ z e • , o H 7 4._ •-•_,..,.._ ---,.....„. , „...„..,,, , I \ („,--) 14,1,N: ,z \, .......„.., ..),„..,,...____,Iy., . ,ip,„i ,,,_.) , . .....,. , N„..„ ? (4. , , .... _ _ i , ---) , X.tr,,g A ---i 0 , • ---N,-.iv& • ,, \•,__ Alt., OA% ,,, ..rni -, • `..,ram �`-- ► `` I wi t ,, ill /-- III TNN—K,\<\N-.\-. NNs\N\ \\‘‘N. 3-j. I Al t`7,,, ,\----',,,‘,,_. 4114; \\:, ,_ ''',. '' '\ \\ NI, ,.11 _ ,,,,'\. --). '''.---'-___.r,..'''',\:,,.\\ ,__, \\\,\ ,\ NVegi. ..411 1 ---'' ,\- --'L'•\'' --,„'z.,-\\,, I r3 6 \\\--. .__\,\\\ I "\, ''''') \,, \\___, 1 44.41, 11 OL ) 6 I 9 ( L I 9 ( 9 ) U ) E I 1 ( L 11 093-O S12JHO : 2:10d /1N MOf:M31AMH gm-ZSb(09E):d L6b9-ZSb(09E):d MOf :031f03HO V J W00'0411N'MMM iii I- Z9E96 VM.S313ONV 1H0d H1N:AS NMVHO bM A±NfO0 NOS2:13±I3f 133aLSA009V3dH1f106LLL ONIA BAH 11S'2 alN:A803NOIS30 ; O ;Mil NMOHS SV :31VOS M NV-Id 1N2WDOVNWJ 213_ VMW1OlS ONIODNION3 IlN ,.,/ 31VO No161A3H W S '! £LOZ'L R�enuef :31tl0 MP'30VNIVHO-LOZL5315-LOOZ-ILN\OM01ueld 0 3uo3 SSOSSOJ3 9 a6eule50\PLezeH aplIsPoel gpedeO 6u0e013 10ZL0313u33roHd1ue0\:9 aZ G o _yamy- —_— *,..4 4114 E=D V°451alliTipi — 4 e :' it‘v . ' i r riti _, i Ilil,g,. (I) ' ,_,..._ ..__________c_ s...___ R, z / : //10111 . $) I _ A zm./ ,... ,,, , \,,,\._ 1 , 4.. .... . ____ .;!:,:„„ . „„„„, , _ ,,,,,_ :;„;„:.,,,,. / ..► I1,, , Q � , 4 . iii;i:: :::Witif 014016Noi" '''tl.i:.:14iiffi f O \''whiptir �'_____„. ......_ .,....,ar - 1 , _= Z *Ittar 4 0ik Ct OW ikl, .... I— ~\ — - 1► ftrNN0 , � � oW�0 /0 � I ILI . ,v-e) 0_ , iz- Al, (1/49 ") . I— \At,- ,,,.... -----%-...-F-.„1:=_ kk-w, iiii tor. , \ '.L011k‘ ' '')LZ1i 1 k?1L,. s N•‘'4*PO 414 O � '� 1 _ .._----\,.. ..„ : , .'"\\ „.\,. ,,7,- II I \ 4\....\...„...,..., oll N/A _ \\ \ \-.t.AS , RN _T' `- Q I n 0L ) 6 ) 9 I L I 9 ( 9 I b ( £ ) z 1 L 4 90310 SIHHO • Hod 8649-Z9b(09£) J,N MOf•M31A321 .- d L I) t649-Z94(09E)�d MOf • O3NO3HO �.1 wog f1b11N'MMM - bM `Jl1Nn0o NOS?I3dd3r Z9£96tlMO V9dH1 osL Al l 41, 211N A6 NMV210 133d1S A008V3d H1f10S L lL )'..+ 0 JNIA3AHfls 21N A933NOI530 Nbid 1N3WJbNb'W 2I31bMW2�OlS JNI33NIJN3 LLN NMOHssr 3ltl°S— H �t w E IOZ'L R�enuef 131V0 31tlO NOISIA321 'WAS w (--s, 6mp 3'JtlNI'dHO-LOZ lO3lO-LOOZ-I1N\°MOlueld IaluoO u0!0 J g e6eulei0\PvezeH api,lspuel k!oedeO 666eee IOZ 10913\l036021d1uaO(:0 c_ C. r •i 1 `ri - 0, 4_ -) F ,. `Q r _� L.,_2 ram- 0 (' rr_ 0 ('vim • U vi ce 2 z� O JO OO 2 _ 2 2 0 3 Q 0 OJ 2 2 Ct 2 2 in �` � Ct Lu � U 0N ct Q = = U Li- o' -c Q� m YU0 0ti U 2 00 Q Lu W 2 0 Lu a ~ J 0 s� 0-W Q Q 0 J ti Q Q _2 ll OJ 0-1Q QW W W 2 0 V �Y I o ti Q� O W rn IP •b • NC o `� 2� z Z 2 — �f�9��: �!0i 3 m a 0 0 W Q �.0 ! e 0 R Q L.L., „ x Q_� Q O-4 0 , L.. , p o"' 2 Q =i:iJ W A �;!� o 2 - o ct 0 (i-- 1_1_ LJ 1--- ti O O 2 0 , o o m3 ~ 2 0 UW Ls �Z ti N O lu (n �O �o U o �O C) 0 0 O O 20 ? J h� m Q. 2 W� U U� xQ ��F— 2 NCO J 2. o 0 U �Z U --i CO 2 2 - - I o W Lu �vi O Li ti W Co3 N m ZJ Z m J J lu 3 O Z Q m Q Q -) ka-L-Li •.' , 2 . o Q Q� Z Cc Z �� o W W liJW ti� ti 0 L.. : Mi� < , oZct o LI NV „Zl� _ 0 W U O n z w w J 1— U I U) z 3 0 _ Q z W CCo ,-. Jo W 0 Q = n a u_ \ -3W Q W Q 0 2 N O Q z• 0 k L Li 0 �2 w U O U Ed >- c k J CC 0 I— .z3 W O Q W 0CC J 0 Li Q Z Q 10 C ti 2 m Ll_ EE2 J� ct 111 O O a Q z 0 \ U cV 0 LLJZ z a NC U Z W 0 O U w o � W U (n .41 Li Z W 0 d- 3 Q-1 v)Li oily!. m u-) 2 I vpitoate re 9 vk M . ••410,:!i 3dld 1N3/773N1• Y U„ �o O N 0 w n •`• r;l�:� Q �y itia204: Q N ? ? Z w A 1333 0£ z 0 m HON32/1 7VSd3dSl0/NOLL bd17/3N/ Q CL m 0 Q J 2 a of i 6 i 9 I L 1 9 I 9 I 4 t £ I Z I l r 99310 SI2JH0 ' 210d /1N MOf:M31A3H B64B-ZS4�09E):3 L609-ZS4(09E):d MOf :03NO3HO Imo'/ Z9E96 OM 53130/NV1 1210d ` M A.NfOO NOSH3dd alp :AeNM�o 133211S AOOBV3d H1f10S Ll( ',�• HlN :AS O3NOIS30 ONIADnHnS 'a NV1d IN3W3Ob'MdW 2131VMW2�OJS ON12:1D NION3 I1N NMOHS SV :3lVOS w �- ELOZ'L tienuef :MVO 31V0 NOISIn32J WAS w I 6A+'P'3DVNIVLIO-LOZLO31O-LOOZ-IINIDMO1L,eId IO4WO0 uolsm3 g 06euleic\p.lezeH OP!Ispuel 4LPede3 61,ea9 LOZL3310LL03ro8d1ua060 14.1 ii � / // {/ Q Q WHO V)W W W z ' • 0110- ::•:•:•: ri 1 ilk .Via::::::::. W Q I o m 3 0 0�o0 �Qv� 44 JW0 \ ." :41:::., 1 / I QEt �Q !/ I !IH 1!!! !:!i Di 7 :I 2 c)—k Z / . 1 O---1 O i WcTnO� Ct 'Aral � 0 3 � nW � � — � ► ` - /' ���wLpm w 2n s w00ODJIiwQDU� > 3 '' - _All/ , LLZtoOm cnct zoJctp00 - W ft / \�_ ir _ / ON (n = w,1Il w— cnLu LL , • ` U0w� > 0w C0mw>m/ I - e pL< E�wIZ � ctw� C00Lu __ / \ U �ctwi_D ct = O /0 � \'�' I _ Z � o�JoQoI\ _ _______, �,. - I d �zQowNJ�zN J0>_ ,m J , ,�. I U1-a LaJ00 o 0‹,0 J� EJ N. o 3ao LLI�NQ�m�O ^ I..L o LL Ct ct O 2 Lu ,i 3 Q sL • `u W.I Ock Q Q ti".. 0 3 (f) T- (./) w �L.., , � O W Qw �� I II I�� Q Fin Q I�I I I I I a I I I � O ^� '11 �� �I �� W CO ai _�I u I �I � Q LW -ip%��� I � Z ;III hl I z CD I I I I\ WQ A I � � 101R / \ IIJ z �\1 II tLij W LU Io I I II �� 0 I III w�= �Q- Dy" oW ''''-------4-\1/4,4 U1 U2 J-� l'QO 0 1Zi •�U ? co Lij jo�U2T Q -03 2� �V • r�r,,�,, QU���m UT QW vJ p�1uUI—LLi �> �' (/) �Q k k T j?sQ a 3 J kJ 0 3 0 0 LU Q oL 1 6 I 9 I L I 9 I 9 I 4 I C I z I L • • DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL REPORT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 1 WEST, W.M. JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON PARCEL NO. 601 1 0201 2 j Ti` 'f E VA, 1f�A� Prepared for MAY 1 4 2013 CHRIS CLEGG JiffEJISON COUNTY BCD w� r NTI Engineering & Land Surveying 717 South Peabody Port Angeles, WA 98362 360-452-8491 www.nti4u.com January 4, 2013 • INTRODUCTION NTI Engineering and Land Surveying was requested by Balance Associates, Architects to develop a Stormwater Management Plan and report for Mr. Chris Clegg's proposed residential home site at parcel 601-102-012, Section 2, Township 29 North, Range 1 West, W.M., Jefferson County, Washington. As part of this analysis, an on-site stormwater infiltration/dispersion system has been designed and a temporary erosion and sediment control plan has been prepared for the construction of a private single- family residence and driveway. II. DESCRIPTION OF SITE The lot is located on the shoreline of Dabob Bay and is bordered on the North, East and South by residential lots. Access to the site is from Kens Way, which runs along the east line of the site. The development area of the site slopes towards the shore at approx. 25%. The western portion of the site slopes steeply to the shoreline and is designated as a landslide and erosion hazard area. The lot is undeveloped and is covered with grass, sparse trees and brush in the proposed development area. The underlying soils are mapped as Cassolary sandy loam (CfD), which is classified in hydrologic soils group "C". The soils were examined and found to consist of 12 inches of gravelly sandy loam over top of gravelly sand with silt. III. METHODOLOGY Jefferson County requires the use of the Department of Ecology (DOE) February 2005 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. The proposed new impervious surface area is more than 2,000 sf. but less than 5,000 sf. Referring to Figure 2.2, minimum requirements 1-5 are required. Minimum requirements #1 thru #5 will be addressed as follows: Minimum Requirement #1 Preparation of Stormwater Site Plan • A complete site plan has been included in the appendix of this report. Minimum Requirement #2 Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) • The SWPPP includes twelve elements. Each element will be addressed separately as follows: Element #1 Mark Clearing Limits o A note has been provided on the SWPPP requiring setback lines and buffer to be marked prior to clearing activities. Element #2 Establish Construction Access o The construction access to the site will be the same as the final driveway access. A note has been provided on the SWPPP requiring gravel surfacing on the driveway prior to clearing/grading activities. 2 • • Element #3 Control Flow Rates o All runoff from new impervious surfaces will be partially infiltrated onsite. Evidence from a site visit indicated a seasonally high GWT. Dispersion will also occur. Element #4 Install Sediment Controls o To minimize erosion during construction, straw wattles will be installed, see plan for location and details. Element#5 Stabilize Soils o To minimize the soil erosion forces of raindrop impact, flowing water and wind erosion during construction, the contractor will follow the exposed and unworked soil schedule set by DOE for all soils on site. From October 1 through April 30, no soils shall remain exposed and unworked for more than 2 days, and from May 1 to September 30, no soils shall remain exposed and unworked for more than 7 days. o All exposed soils caused by construction activities shall be stabilized and hydroseeded or sodded upon completion of the project. Element #6 Protect Slopes o The steep western slope will be protected by the buffer setback. Element #7 Protect Drain Inlets o There are no inlets existing that will require protection. Element#8 Stabilize Channels and Outlets o No channels or outlets existing within or down-slope of the building site. Stormwater during construction will sheet flow across the site through the temporary BMPs. Element #9 Control Pollutants o All chemicals, liquid products, petroleum products and non-inert wastes present on site shall be covered, contained and protected from vandalism and handled in a manner to minimize contamination of stormwater. o To minimize pollutants generated by heavy equipment and vehicles, all maintenance and repairs shall be conducted using spill prevention measures such as drip pans. Element#10 Control De-watering o The underlying soils are permeable, the need for dewatering should be minimal. It is recommended however, that construction take place during the dry season. If de-watering is necessary it shall be done in compliance with the 2005 DOE manual. Element #11 Maintain BMPs (best management practices) o It is the contractor's responsibility to maintain the temporary erosion and sediment control measures and to install the permanent erosion and sediment control measures set forth in this report and plan. 3 • S o After construction is complete, maintenance of permanent erosion and sediment control measures are the owner's responsibility. o All temporary erosion and sediment control measures shall be removed within 30 days after final site stabilization is achieved or as needed if longer. Element #12 Manage The Project o Management of this project can best be conducted in accordance with DOE if the guidelines set forth in this report and plan are followed to ensure that the long term goals of environmental protection and site stability are achieved. Minimum Requirement #3 Source Control of Pollution • As stated in Element #9, to minimize pollutants generated by heavy equipment and vehicles, all maintenance and repairs shall be conducted using spill prevention measures such as drip pans. • Source control of pollutants during construction can be maintained on this job by implementing the temporary erosion and sediment control measures set forth. • Long-term source control of pollution is the responsibility of the property owner and includes all categories of household and yard chemicals and pollutants. Minimum Requirement #4 Preservation of Natural Drainage Systems and Outfalls • The natural drainage route on the site is infiltration and sheet flow of excess to the west. • The vegetated portion of the site will continue to sheet flow as it did prior to development. Minimum Requirement #5 On-site Stormwater Management • The roof downspouts will be directed to an infiltration/dispersion system designed to provide dispersion of excess flow on the surface. This facility will be located a minimum at least 10 feet from property lines. • The runoff from the driveway will be directed to rock dispersion pads on the south side of the driveway. • Routine observation and maintenance by the owner is highly recommended and necessary to maintain a functioning drainage system on site. A functioning drainage system should infiltrate and if necessary disperse the runoff without causing erosion on site or downstream. IV. CONCLUSIONS Prior to breaking ground the temporary erosion control measures set forth in this report and plan shall be installed on site to minimize erosion and control sediment discharge during construction activities. These measures include a straw wattle and standard soil stabilization BMP's. During construction temporary erosion control measures should be inspected regularly and repaired as necessary. Once the site is developed and stabilized, these BMPs can be removed. 4 • • V. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Chris Clegg for their proposed construction of a private home. The recommendations in the report apply only to the property that was examined and they are not applicable to other locations. The investigation and recommendations contained in this report are based upon site condi- tions as they existed at the time of our site inspections. During construction, if subsurface or other conditions are discovered that are significantly different from those described in the report, NTI should be advised at once so that we can review the conditions and reconsider our recommendations, where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on construction sites, especially when the topography has been altered years ago. Such unexpected conditions frequently require that additional expenditures be made to attain a properly constructed project. We recommend that a contingency be established in the project budget and schedule to cover unexpected conditions. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering principles and practice. This warranty is in lieu of all others, either expressed or implied. NTI ENGINEERING & SURVEYING ws/<s 4 1 tii O o -fie *1 �? Iti 9 45910 � �c9FG/STE - S/ONALE Zach Iota Justin C. Wilson, PE En veering Technician Principal Engineer • • APPENDIX A.) STORMWATER SITE SUBMITTAL TEMPLATE B.) STORM WATER CALCULATION WORKSHEET C.) FIGURE 1 : NEW DEVELOPMENT FLOWCHART D.) CRITICAL AREA MAPS(JEFFERSON CO.) • • APPENDIX A • • �gON c 49 7:4 JEFFERSON COUNTY 4404 ►� •4 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend • Washington 98368 qs, O 360/379-4450 . 360/379-4451 Fax 41N01. http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ STORMWATER SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL TEMPLATE MLA# PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: Chris Clegg Please answer all of the following questions to the best of your ability. Where the question calls for depiction on a site map, the applicant may choose to either incorporate the elements into the general plot plan for the Master Land Use Application or to submit a separate stormwater site plan map. Project Overview 1. Describe the proposed developed conditions of the site. Indicate position and relative size of proposed improvements on the site map. Private single family residence and driveway. The residence will be built in the center of the lot near the north setback line. Existing Conditions Summary 2. Describe the existing topography. Indicate contours on the site map. The development area slopes downward to the west at approximately 25% . 3. Describe the existing vegetation. Indicate native vegetation areas on the site map. There is grass, sparse trees and brush in the development area. 4. Describe the existing soils. Indicate soil type on the site map. The underlying soils are mapped as Cassolary sandy loam (CfD) , which is classified in hydrologic soils group "C" . 5. Describe the existing site hydrology(i.e., drainage; behavior of water on the site—above, below, and on the ground). Indicate existing stormwater drainage to and from the site on the site map. Depict separate drainage basins on the site map, if applicable,and indicate acreage of each. The natural drainage route on the site is infiltration and sheet flow of excess to the west. 6. Describe any excess levels of noise generated by the proposed use or activity: -None- stormwater site plan template.doc-rev.10/12/2003 5 • • 7. Describe significant geographic features and critical areas (i.e., environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands, streams, steep slopes,etc.)on the site. Indicate location on the site map. The western portion of the site slopes steeply to the shoreline and is designated as a landslide and erosion hazard area. 8. Describe the general vicinity of the site, including adjacent land uses and structures, utilities, roads, and sensitive/critical areas (streams,wetlands, lakes,steep slopes,etc.). To the west of the parcel is Dabob Bay. To the north and south is residential lots . To the east the driveway connects to Kens Way. An existing water line connects to a main on Kens Way. Landslide hazard/steep slope at the west end. Permanent Stormwater Control Plan This portion of the Stormwater Site Plan consists of the selection and installation of the appropriate stormwater control BMPs and facilities to remain in place after construction of the project is completed. "Medium" size projects are required to have the totals calculated of all impervious surfaces, pollution-generating impervious surfaces, and pollution-generating pervious surfaces to verify that the thresholds for treatment facilities and flow control facilities are not exceeded. g. Describe the developed site hydrology, as proposed. Indicate whether stormwater will be fully dispersed (i.e., per BMP T5.30 in the Manual)or, if not, what types of stormwater flow control will be utilized for the site or specific threshold discharge areas within the site. Locate these facilities on the site plan and differentiate proposed facilities from existing facilities. The stormwater runoff from the roof downspouts will be routed to an infiltration/dispersion trench with excess flow in the form of sheet flow. The runoff from the driveway will be routed to quarry spall dispersion pads spaced evenly throughout the length of the driveway. The undisturbed areas will continue as sheet flow. 10. If the project requires the use of stormwater treatment facilities, describe the types of stormwater treatment facilities proposed for use on the site. Locate these facilities on the site plan and differentiate proposed facilities from existing facilities. [This is normally for"large"projects or projects that involve the potential for dispersion of contaminants.] -None- 11. Describe the performance goals and standards applicable to the project. Minimum Requirements #1-#5 of the DOE Stormwater Management Manual are required and the Drainage & Erosion Control Report has been prepared in accordance with these requirements . 12. Describe the flow control system. An infiltration trench will control the flow of stormwater. Excess flow will be diverted through the trench and away from the site via sheet flow. stormwater site plan template.doc—rev.10/12/2003 6 • • 13. Describe the water quality system. —None- 14. Describe the conveyance system analysis and design. For new the home runoff will be collected by roof drains and conveyed by downspouts to an infiltration/dispersion trench. For the driveway, runoff will be conveyed by a series of gravel berms to rock pads where it will be dispersed across native vegetation. 15. Describe the source of fill material, physical characteristics of fill material,and deposition of excess material. 1) Drain Rock - Clean, rounded aggregate for trenches . 2) Gravel Pad - Compacted crushed rock for pads . 16. Proposed methods of placement and compaction consistent with the applicable standards on Appendix Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. No compaction of drain rock necessary. Light compaction of gravel pads may be needed. 17. Describe the proposed surfacing material. The driveway will be surfaced with clean crushed rock. 18. Describe methods for restoration of the site. All disturbed areas will be hydroseeded or sodded upon completion of construction activities . 19. An Operation and Maintenance Manual is required for each flow control and treatment facility. [This is normally required for "large"projects only and only those for which facilities are required to control flow or treat runoff.] If included, list the Manuals here. —None- 20. List here and include any special reports or studies conducted to prepare the Stormwater Site Plan. —None- 21. List other necessary permits and approvals as required by other regulatory agencies. If those permits or approvals include conditions that affect the drainage plan or contain more restrictive drainage-related requirements,describe those conditions or restrictions here. -None- stormwater site plan template.doc—rev.10/12/2003 7 CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN(SWPPP) The Construction SWPPP addresses sediment and erosion control during construction. The BMPs indicated by the applicant in the template that follows must be installed on the ground during all construction phases of the project. The proponent is responsible for preventing sediment and erosion impacts to environmentally sensitive areas and off-site areas. Consult the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet for guidance, particularly with rural residential development. SECTION I—CONSTRUCTION SWPPP NARRATIVE 1. Construction Stormwater Pollution Plan Elements. Describe how each of the Construction SWPPP elements has been or will be addressed. Identify the type and location of BMPs used to satisfy the required element. If an element is not applicable to the proposal,justify in writing. Descriptions of the 12 Elements are found at section 2.5.2 of the Manual(beginning on page 2-15). 12 Required Elements—Construction SWPPP 1. Mark Clearing Limits. A note has been provided on the SWPPP requiring setback lines and buffer to be marked prior to clearing activities. 2. Establish Construction Access. The construction access to the site will be the same as the final driveway access . A note has been provided on the SWPPP requiring gravel surfacing on the driveway prior to clearing/grading activities 3. Control Flow Rates. All runoff from new impervious surfaces will be infiltrated onsite and dispersed as necessary. 4. Install Sediment Controls. To minimize erosion during construction, straw wattles will be installed, see plan for location and details . 5. Stabilize Soils. All exposed soils caused by construction activities shall be stabilized and hydroseeded or sodded upon completion of the project. 6. Protect Slopes. The steep western slope will be protected by the buffer setback. 7. Protect Drain Inlets. There are no inlets existing that will require protection. stormwater site plan template.doc—rev.10/12/2003 8 • • 12 Required Elements—Construction SWPPP(continued) 8. Stabilize Channels and Outlets. No channels or outlets existing within or down-slope of the building site . Stormwater during construction will sheet flow across the site through the temporary BMPs . 9. Control Pollutants. All chemicals, liquid products, petroleum products and non-inert wastes present on site shall be covered, contained and protected from vandalism and handled in a manner to minimize contamination of stnrrnI.Latr 10. Control De-Watering(the act of pumping groundwater or stormwater away from an active construction site). The underlying soils are permeable, the need for dewatering should be minimal. It is recommended however, that construction take place during the dry season. If de-watering is necessary it shall be done in compliance with the 2005 DOE manual . 11. Maintain Best Management Practices(BMPs). It is the contractor' s responsibility to maintain the temporary erosion and sediment control measures and to install the permanent erosion and sediment control measures set forth in this report and plan. 12. Manage the Project. Management of this project can best be conducted in accordance with DOE if the guidelines set forth in this report and plan are followed to ensure that the long term goals of environmental protection and site stability are achieved. 2. Adjacent Areas. a. Description of the adjacent areas that may be affected by site disturbance (e.g., streams, lakes, wetlands, residential areas, roads). Adjacent areas will be unaffected. b. Description of the downstream drainage path leading from the site to the receiving body of water(minimum distance of 400 yards). _ Drainage leaving the site will be in the form of sheet flow. The sheet flow will follow the natural topography of the site to the west where it will flow into Dabob Bay. 3. Environmentally Sensitive Areas. a. Description of environmentally sensitive areas that are on or adjacent to the site. Landslide hazard stormwater site plan template.doc—rev.10/12/2003 9 • • b. Description of special requirements for working in or near environmentally sensitive areas. Setbacks must be met. See geotechnical report. 4. Erosion Problem Areas. Description of potential erosion problems on site in the context of the characteristics of the on-site soils(e.g., erodibility,settleability, permeability, depth,texture,soil structure). The Jefferson County Critical Areas Map does not list any portion of this parcel as having erosion hazard. 5. Construction Phasing. a. Construction sequence b. Construction phasing(if proposed) 6. Construction Schedule. Wet season is October 1 through April 30(page 2-21 of the Manual). Provide a proposed construction schedule. II. Wet Season Construction Activities. a. Proposed wet season construction activities. b. Proposed wet season construction activities for environmentally sensitive areas. 7. Financial/Ownership Responsibilities. a. Identify the property owner responsible for the initiation of bonds and/or other financial securities. b. Describe bonds and/or other evidence of financial responsibility for liability associated with erosion and sedimentation impacts. 8. Engineering Calculations. Provide Design Calculations on a separate sheet for the following, if applicable. a. Sediment Ponds/Traps. b. Diversions. c. Waterways. d. Runoff/Stormwater Detention Calculations stormwater site plan template.doc—rev.10/12/2003 10 • • SECTION II—EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN Sediment and erosion control measures may be depicted on the master land use application plot plan,a stormwater site plan,and/or a separate Construction SWPPP site plan. This is a checklist to ensure that the following are depicted on a site plan: 1. General. a. Vicinity Map b. Jefferson County Approval Block c. Erosion and Sediment Control Notes 2. Site Plan. a. Legal description of subject property. b. North arrow. c. Indicate boundaries of existing vegetation(e.g.,tree lines, pasture areas, etc.). d. Identify and label areas of potential erosion problems. e. Identify FEMA base flood boundaries and Shoreline Management boundaries(if applicable). f. Show existing and proposed contours. g. Indicate drainage basins and direction of flow for individual drainage areas. h. Label final grade contours and identify developed condition drainage basins. i. Delineate areas that are to be cleared and graded. j. Show all cut and fill slopes indicating top and bottom of slope catch lines. 3. Conveyance Systems. a. Designate locations for swales, interceptor trenches,or ditches. b. Show all temporary and permanent drainage pipes,ditches,or cut-off trenches required for erosion&sediment control. c. Provide minimum slope and cover for all temporary pipes or call out pipe inverts. d. Shows grades,dimensions,and direction of flow in all ditches, swales, culverts and pipes. e. Provide details for bypassing off-site runoff around disturbed areas. f. Indicate locations and outlets of any dewatering systems. 4. Location of Detention Best Management Practices(BMPs). Identify location of detention BMPs. 5. Erosion and Sediment Control Facilities. a. Show the locations of sediment trap(s), pond(s), pipes and structures. b. Dimension pond berm widths and inside and outside pond slopes. c. Indicate the trap/pond storage required and the depth, length,and width dimensions. d. Provide typical section views through pond and outlet structure. e. Provide typical details of gravel cone and standpipe, and/or other filtering devices. f. Detail stabilization techniques for outlet/inlet. g. Detail control/restrictor device location and details. h. Specify mulch and/or recommended cover of berms and slopes. i. Provide rock specifications and detail for rock check dam(s), if applicable. j. Specify spacing for rock check dams as required. k. Provide front and side sections of typical rock check dams. I. Indicate the locations and provide details and specifications for silt fabric. m. Locate the construction entrance and provide a detail. 6. Detailed Drawings. Any structural practices used that are not referenced in the Ecology Manual should be explained and illustrated with detailed drawings. 7. Other Pollutant BMPs. Indicate on the site plan the locations of BMPs to be used for the control of pollutants other than sediment(e.g., concrete wash water). 8. Monitoring Locations. Indicate on the site plan the water quality sampling locations to be used for monitoring water quality on the construction site. Sampling stations should be located upstream and downstream of the project site. stormwater site plan template.doc—rev.10/12/2003 11 • • Stormwater Site Plan Changes If the designer wishes to make changes or revisions to the originally approved Stormwater Site Plan, the proposed revisions shall be submitted to DCD prior to construction. The submittal shall include substitute pages that include all proposed changes, revised drawings showing any structural changes,and any other supporting information that explains and supports the reason for the change. Final Corrected Plan Submittal If the project included construction of conveyance systems, treatment facilities, flow control facilities, or structural source control BMPs (not standard on-site stormwater management BMPs), the applicant shall submit a final corrected plan ("as-builts")when the project is completed. These should be engineering drawings (stamped by a licensed civil engineer) that accurately represent the project as constructed. APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Construction SWPPP worksheet, I as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. (LANDOWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) THIS SPACE MAY BE USED FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES, IF NEEDED: stormwater site plan template.doc—rev.10/12/2003 12 • Stormwater Site Plan Changes If the designer wishes to make changes or revisions to the originally approved Stormwater Site Plan, the proposed revisions shall be submitted to DCD prior to construction. The submittal shall include substitute pages that include all proposed changes, revised drawings showing any structural changes,and any other supporting information that explains and supports the reason for the change. Final Corrected Plan Submittal If the project included construction of conveyance systems, treatment facilities, flow control facilities, or structural source control BMPs (not standard on-site stormwater management BMPs), the applicant shall submit a final corrected plan ("as-builts")when the project is completed. These should be engineering drawings (stamped by a licensed civil engineer) that accurately represent the project as constructed. APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Construction SWPPP worksheet, I as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. (LANDOWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) THIS SPACE MAY BE USED FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES, IF NEEDED: stormwater site plan template.doc—rev.10/12/2003 12 • 0 APPENDIX B • • �4��s°N ��� JEFFERSON COUNTY ti DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street• Port Townsend • Washington 98368 •qS, 0�O 360/379-4450 • 360/379-4451 Fax http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ Stormwater Calculation Worksheet MLA# PROJECT/APPLICANT NAME: Chris Clegg DETERMINING STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS: This stormwater calculation worksheet should be completed first to classify the proposal as"small,""medium,"or"large." The size determines whether a Stormwater Site Plan is required in conjunction with a stand-alone stormwater management permit application, building permit application, or other land use approval application that involves stormwater review. The basic information will also be helpful for completing a Stormwater Site Plan, if required. PARCEL SIZE(I.E.,SITE) Size of parcel 1 . 62 acres An acre contains 43,560 square feet. Multiply the acreage by this figure. Size of parcel in square feet 7 0, 4 51 sq/ft Land-disturbing activity is any activity that results in movement of earth, or a change in the existing soil cover(both vegetative and non-vegetative) and/or the existing soil topography. Land disturbing activities include, but are not limited to clearing, grading, filling, excavation,and compaction associated with stabilization of structures and road construction. Native vegetation is vegetation comprised on plant species,other than noxious weeds,that are indigenous to the coastal region of the Pacific Northwest and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur on the site. Examples include species such as Douglas fir,western hemlock,western red cedar,alder,big-leaf maple,and vine maple;shrubs such as willow, elderberry,salmonberry, and salal;herbaceous plants such as sword fern,foam flower, and fireweed. LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY,CONVERSION OF NATIVE VEGETATION,AND VOLUME OF CUT/FILL Calculate the total area to be cleared, graded,filled, Answer the following two questions related to excavated,and/or compacted for proposed development conversion of native vegetation: project. Include in this calculation the area to be cleared for: 2, 043 Does the project convert'/+acres or more of Construction site for structures sq/ft native vegetation to lawn or landscaped areas? Drainfield,septic tank,etc. 1, 300 sq/ft Circle: Yes C No) Well,utilities,etc _ sq/ft Does the project convert 2'/z acres or more of 3, 454 native vegetation to pasture? Driveway, parking, roads,etc. sq/ft Circle: Yes (No) Lawn, landscaping,etc. sq/ft Other compacted surface, etc. sq/ft Indicate Total Volumes of Proposed: Total Land Disturbance 6, 797 sq/ft Cut Fill (cu/yd) [over] stormwater calc worksheet—REV 2/20/2008 1 • • Impervious surface is a hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle as under natural conditions prior to development. A hard surface area which causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased rate of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to roof tops, walkways, patios, driveways, parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads, packed earthen materials, and oiled, macadam or other surfaces which similarly impede the natural infiltration of stormwater. STORMWATER CALULATIONS—IMPERVIOUS SURFACE NEW EXISTING Structures (all roof area) 2, 043 sq/ft Structures(all roof area) sq/ft Sidewalks sq/ft Sidewalks sq/ft Patios 175 sq/ft Patios sq/ft Solid Decks sq/ft Solid Decks sq/ft (without infiltration below) (without infiltration below) Driveway,parking,roads,etc sq/ft Driveway, parking, roads,etc 3, 454 _sq/ft Other sq/ft Other sq/ft Total New sq/ft Total Existing 3, 454 sq/ft TOTAL NEW+TOTAL EXISTING* 5, 6 7 2 sq/ft "This amount will be used to check total lot coverage. The following questions will help determine whether the proposed project is considered development or redevelopment. DEVELOPMENT v. REDEVELOPMENT Divide the total existing impervious surface above by the size of the parcel and convert to a percentage: 5 % Does the site have 35%or more of existing impervious surface? Circle: Yes No FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS: If the answer is yes, the proposal is considered redevelopment and the attached Figure 2 should be used to determine the applicable Minimum Requirements. If the answer is no, the proposal is considered new development and the attached Figure 1 should be used. At this juncture, the applicant should refer to the applicable Flow Chart to determine the Minimum Requirements for stormwater management, DCD staff will help verify the classification of the project and the application requirements. For proponents of "small' projects who must comply only with Minimum Requirement #2—Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention—an additional submittal is not required. The proponent is responsible for employing the 12 Elements to control erosion and prevent sediment and other pollutants from leaving the site during the construction phase of the project. Pick up the Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention (SWPP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) Packet. Proponents of"medium" projects—those that must meet only Minimum Requirements #1 through #5—and for `large" projects—those that must meet all 10 Minimum Requirements—are required to submit a Stormwater Site Plan. DCD has prepared a submittal template of a Stormwater Site Plan, principally for rural residential projects. Complete the template in the Stormwater Site Plan Instructions and Submittal Template or prepare a Stormwater Site Plan using the step-by-step guidance in the Stormwater Management Manual. APPLICANT SIGNATURE By signing the Stormwater Calculation Worksheet, I as the applicant/owner attest that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I also certify that this application is being made with the full knowledge and consent of all owners of the affected property. (LANDOWNER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE) (DATE) FOR OFFICE USE ON L t S erer� . s c f r5 :3 MPL 'WO 1Gr r4r-ktfEveLoplight stormwater talc worksheet—REV.2/20/2008 2 • • APPENDIX C • • Start Here Does the site have Yes See Redevelopment 35%or more of — - ---► Minimum existing impervious Requirements and coverage? Flow Chart Does the project convert (Figure 2.3) No '/ acres or more of native ♦ vegetation to lawn or Does the project add No landscaped areas, or 5,000 square feet or convert 2.5 acres or more more of new of native vegetation to impervious surfaces? pasture? Yes Yes No Does the project have ♦ 2,000 square feet or All Minimum more of new, replaced, Requirements apply to or new plus replaced the new impervious impervious surfaces? surfaces and converted pervious surfaces. Yes / No Minimum Does the project have Requirements#1 land-disturbing through#5 apply to 44 activities of 7,000 the new and replaced Yes square feet or more? impervious surfaces -- and the land disturbed. No V See Minimum Requirement #2, Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Figure 2.2—Flow Chart for Determining Requirements for New Development February 2005 Volume t—Minimum Technical Requirements 2-9 • • APPENDIX D Map Output41/ • Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map fuyf 40200/ '.. kf14 02025 020' AI Ciif SU20;6 ••"". C0.s,ohsrr r1+i•.r:Zr1f1 WIfva11o2x )11020t'! • td! P1�.,L+lUfO' r tLegend 7 Selected Features i .. • Towns County Sort ^6yl nsr�.2 � 60 t02Jt'+ 6,aSSU20fs o RurelCanl ors 01 JC Roads &)C2oSS Parcels.H rc is•H Shoreline Slope Stability OslabW (�n %n�a0}� lntarn+wti a[c fx. G1o.R> p D Unstable {;ry'Cti rti+j UnzlaloSo Ro a ct Land hdo r I i � s � Unsiair�a Okl Lm+dclrlo rye o020 t 60110200 hi»?:;rrr,^cvJt ti...ai Co:rr Car,411 ices GI 0 2d.''ifl FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Nov 02 15:57:02 2012 http://maps.co,jefferson.wa.us/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrirnap?ServiceName=ovmap&Cl... 11/2/2012 Map Output • 0 Page 1 of 1 ArcIMS HTML Viewer Map ,.....tAk ,I1020:), 4...iitiWf • ': . ,'itie? .)710,ty,8 t ) •.! €01,1u2ole. , ,--' i tt - :-• ' - . , j• - _ :. ' , , . • - ... , .i ft '1020,24 6,01,02ot 1 1.111woil •• -..'-..,,,, ty.),,020,0 .. • ' - -• . i Legend ,. 1.`"'-`,,i Selected Features 6ol.10 2COY ! .'"." Vij ' .. '::''':::...:'..,. ' Towns .. . . ! * Cou!Hy Sent . ,. 1,140202 ",,,vi• 60.l•020 l'a 601102016 • Rural Cantors .4:1;:c .'"'4'''''''''''''''.',...-.. . .. 4til,,tiyaej, 4„..., JC Roads ,t,fts',,:";',A,t,,*:. At.,-02',... ., -;vmV.,0...,.pii,;:f. —I', •••., ,;4,:'?.t3\4$?,.i.N, ; 1 Parcels-H ,‘';N: ,./t4f.`' '4gr,.f14,,,,'„,,, Landslide Hazard /.A:'.,N,P..,, ,r:-:::,i,.-:" . , . . ..c,:;:::"'.:15,1,:n5...:;,.;::'::,;::: ; rz,1,4.1 Skfcs - „,--,...... ...._, Ei.:,...'l0;GCO:i A 'Vivi -::' ,!!'71?ci 6(..”102005 • '64,:“ 002 ;..--'l,:',,:7l, i Suallt WI Yr.1 I 031 ...:..,.5 -..,...., „ ...., l'.,;-':,:.,:f (1 1,Ci4 OC,6 Maar:sr:0..1 r.r,s."<!?:,,,,i Cu.1 17i CC,a..,.:%,.A.::<AS' 0, '''A 2,161t FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no warranty with respect to its correctness or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. Fri Nov 02 15:58:18 2012 http://maps.cojefferson.wa.us/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap&Cl... 1 1/2/2012 • • Not. % '4.'.', •ili• " ;4; .; i-", .. � _ a r. .L 4.. "' _• �` `+. 'aid,_ '� >. C a ^, . a► ,1- '"I4'. 4,, �s �s'A w o✓.'�SZr YY _ 4 ��." -�' ,j Ira `� -viivv .. --.. ,.3.,.... -, -.0,11,.. fy•y y y ,r'� h ,A,°' , i r • 1. f�c/i��i � ` r7,0 L ;�+` f+, r�•a•F �, iV. `�it. III •i.I aa!1!AA���/.+.. •Vlklik , ".. M 1 ,`:4-VA 0- qy(P .IY►.n y., V "'n•. '-hA �—I 1p,, S" q X...`A fl y v. '1gf} 5 " i • • # • t. r ;, S 1 „wr t r a •., .'1 4 -r _ f lk._ . - , N;Atit., ' • ityg, _ � j + ,�s_ :�; +fir y •.,,_ .� .' Y, ,/ w ski - A p " ,<r � i:`r • :. < _v; ;'fir Y .y" �1.'y. :F` „r.4.:•,,,.,p.6:l,--•'..-..,.-.„r.-,.7,i.As,'--i-1,.r.1,'-,..-,i _,r {',-A. S+�.kri -},f}+ti_r�t.Y ! 5,;. ('1 r .,a'.C:' i - .,,., ...1 ,,-,.'.1;.,,7. ""r.b' i^ 4••'5 „. �I y,. .. .c.,"_. -lai Y `'`.,4,1 "fyrF o,—r.'—,i,..—...•'...-........44_,".e1 ..-1..-,-•,„a:...,7 .'.,;',.,t,;-I..).6.1.‘.,,..r,)•7 t,., �'' t.l,` .-"` �HW<?! i ` . a,4',F u^kt •` ' : ,`, / ff' t t i1 re. �i ' to.,, it %rt'_� r�Z �' ,,,.., ,; / •fir. * }.� #a q!� iP� '6' -7 "� `.: . •4 _asap.' ,:`- 'f' * '4.. * - • • ," 1.;4 btu + .' ' A,. .,, 1. rt rk 4 ff il Si y4 1 - ,y . ,. s �� ,�1 � .t+,�sJ• y f.A . %[ r 5 ,� ` T. j ' �I! � � y K :.y ' r •pi„,. /1 I. • ,:; C , ,s ,r r r [i ;t . . L • !, ' Altr L- a is _ lY,. \ . 0 4 . ., ... ., ,,i,' , •' J.), .'h , . gb • 7 4 • . '',.,t,!:;:t 4 if:...' . . s i 7 kte to, 14 ' \ 4,,Olt' ,. t. i *.A , f;9' r .mow , .d , r ;lam. , '.' I ,r`• � , 1., ,.,., -P " • A� 4.4..., • .f "' A .,.! "?'t.y,:i`lS+ 1.z4' '�d.d.. 1 >\ �,,r fy t� afrir .,,y�', .� • :1 • � � '� _. mow_ _ - ! - 1 p ,.ems � � •���1:r4\:Ip� W . Via.. I. J • ''. VP" .40111/ ,. a ,,'a 1:1,.'�,,, i ,ti ,+:.K.., 1'..'s:N..'.4it` 6 a r;`' ^;,��� �► iJ A. ..., '`h , Y ..1. ,'''y,'4, .--;i1 •}�par�"!,/�1 1'fR'�� ir/;.r•• 'I �,,'"4w l,n" . �.P,,,,~,`i.. t 1 . 0 0 II_ la • ,! ••A ti • •- A. .fit10 b !if } ` 4 • * - mg ♦dw I tt y am I) 1orsM t; - - fW C ; • '3 _ ` r` T e6' mod _ ' • .i.'�'Y T•F�T�y fie - Fp. .. I;4 .:. • ,. .411P. . 4.4, i. L c,r ,- yam,ira,t• .;a.. s r' •q v '* :• -ly 1 v L 1.1t x 1 4* 04,6v4 y. • 4 , , • • d f WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFV4 A.,AT 1 4 BALD EAGLE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2013 In accordance with the Washington State Bald Eagle Protection Act UN. M j iiCp and the associated Bald Eagle Protection Rules (WAC 232-12-292) Not for Subdivisions, Short Plats, or Conversions Bald Eagle Territory: L-0010 rarer, 'nn i4 Occurrence # /'6:5" Nest # Proposed Activity: U irtq� -6,14 1yS/ ii e. CONDITIONS: All known bald eagle nest trees (active or alternate) and winter roost sites are protected. The following conditions apply to portions of a parcel that fall within the distance guidelines: CONDITION l: This parcel is within 400 feet of a bald eagle nest. Retain all known perch trees, all native conifers and all black cottonwood trees >24 inches diameter at breast height (diameter 4.5 feet from ground, known as d.b.h). Also retain >50% of coniferous and cottonwood trees <24 inches d.b.h. and > 6 feet tall, with diameter distributions representative of the original stand AND no structures are located within the fall zone of a bald eagle nest tree. Above-ground tree damage, root injury or severance, or root compaction by any machinery to retained trees is not permitted by this plan. Windowing and low limbing of trees is acceptable provided no more than 30% of the live crown is removed. Topping of trees is not allowed. _ CONDITION 2: This parcel is located >400 feet and < 800 feet of a bald eagle nest or within 1/2 mile from a nest tree and within 250 horizontal feet of the shoreline or top of high bank bordering a shoreline. Retain all known perch trees, and 75% native conifers and cottonwoods >24 inches d.b.h. Also retain >50% of native conifer and cottonwood trees <24 inches d.b.h. and > 6 feet tall, with diameter distributions representative of the original stand. Above-ground tree damage, root injury or severance, or root compaction by any machinery to retained trees is not permitted by this plan. Windowing and low limbing of trees is acceptable provided no more than 30% of the live crown is removed. Topping of trees is not allowed. I have read and understand the above condition placed on Parcel # 6'0 t, /V, 0 with a street address of 90-7 I'etis 6,Uxti Q th Iceh e, WI-) 983 7 . If the conditions set forth above are acceptable, please sign below and this Will serve as your Bald Eagle Management Plan. Activities will be periodically monitored and failure to comply with this Plan constitutes a misdemeanor as set forth in RCW 77.15.130. WDFW Regional Wildlife Manager d er Signature (Date) � ' Lando ner r1n ame City/County Official (Date) ( 1 c- G_) �_ ,,, i\ Addle '� "'✓ A) Send Copy To: City, S e,Zip — `v C 7 7 Jeff Skriletz,District Wildlife Biologist WDFW Region 6, 48-B Devonshire Rd. 7 „' Montesano,WA 98563-9618 Phone Fax: (360)249-1229