HomeMy WebLinkAbout502112035 Eagle Mgmt PlanCURT SMITCH
D~recto~
July 9, 1992
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE
Linda Atkins
Jefferson County Health'Department
Castle Hill Center
615 Sheridan
Port Townsend, WA 98368-2439
Dear Linda,
The Washington Department of Wildlife has found Mr. Yukimori Moji's
Dosewallips property, located in the SW 1/4 of Section 2, T. 25N,
R. 2W, specifically, Gov't Lot 3; parcel number 298777, outside the
Dosewallips Bald Eagle Management zone. As a result, septic
permits for this parcel as well as permits for Mr. Moji's Gov't Lot
2, when applied for, may be issued. Thank you for your assistance
in this difficult situation.
Sincerely,
Bald Eagle Management Biologist
cc: Wise
Smith
- jEFFE'RS'ON I~OUNTY -
OEPT. OF COMMUNITY OEVELOPMEN?
-- . J i i i ii I II I I i ii
Bald Eagle Nesting Territory Management Plan
Dosewallips, Jefferson County
Territory #879, Sec. 2, T. 25 N., R. 2 W.
September, 1992
Prepared for:
Yukimori Moji
c/o Harold Coe
720 Olive Way, Suite 1300
Seattle, WA 98101-1812
Prepared by:
Anita McMillan
Washington Department of Wildlife
905 E. Heron
Aberdeen, WA 98520
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE
BALD EAGLE TERRITORY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
On behalf of the people of the State of Washington, to which its
wildlife belongs, the following agreement is hereby enacted for
the purpose of protecting bald eagles and their habitats.
The landowner and the Washington Department of Wildlife agree to
the conservation measures described in the attached territory
management plan.
Territory Name:
Dosewallips #879
Legal Description:
S. 2, T. 25 N., R..2 W.
Jefferson County, Washington
In witness whereas mutually agreed upon and signed this
of :
day
Landowner (signature)
(print)
Address
City, State, Zip
State of Washington Department of Wildlife
Regional Manager
Date
Wildlife Biologist Region
Table of Contents
Introduction
Site Description
Eagle Ecology
Proposed Land Use
Management Terms and Conditions
Monitor and Review
Compliance
INTRODUCTION
The bald eagle is listed by the U.S. Department of Interior as a
threatened species in Washington. The protection of nesting,
roosting, and foraging habitats is critical to the effort to
remove the bald eagle from threatened species status in
Washington State. The bald eagle protection rules (WAC 282-12-
292) and the enabling legislation (RCW 77.12.655) were enacted in
1986 to provide protection to important eagle habitats. These
rules were developed by a committee of landowners, the realty
industry, and conservation organizations. The Washington
Department of Wildlife (WDW) is directed by these rules to meet
with landowners and state and local agencies to develop
management plans for eagle nest territories and roosts that may
be impacted by land use changes. Appendix 1 includes these rules
and some other laws that provide protection to bald eagles and
their habitat.
The purpose of the bald eagle protection rules is to protect the
habitat and thereby increase and maintain the population of the
bald eagle so that the species no longer is classified as
threatened or endangered in Washington State. The Pacific Bald
Eagle Recovery Plan identifies the delisting criteria as follows:
1) Minimum of 800 nesting pairs in the Pacific recovery area
(Washington, Oregon, California, Montana, Wyoming, Idaho and
Nevada) ; 2) average reproduction rate of 1.0 fledged young per
pair with an average success rate per occupied site of not less
than 85% over a five year period; 3) attainment of breeding
population goals in at least 80% of the manaq~ement zones with
nesting potential (there are 47 management zones in the seven
states within the Pacific Recover Area); and 4) stable or
increasing winter populations.
The Dosewallips bald eagle nesting territory is located in the
Puget Sound Recovery Zone - #4. The Habitat Management Goal for
Zone ~4 is 156 which is the minimum number of territories needed
to sustain secure habitat for the recovered population. Although
WDW has identified 243 occupied territories within this zone
during 1991 the habitat within most of these territories has not
been secured from potential land use impacts. According to the
Pacific Bald Eagle Recovery Plan, -Habitat occupied by bald
eagles must continue to be protected and managed · . · Forest
stands used by eagles must be managed to maintain the long-term
availability of nest sties, roosts, and foraging habitat-~
Because of rapidly increasing impacts by humans on the Pacific
Northwest landscape, bald eagle recovery hinges upon our ability
to identify and properly manage bald eagle habitat. The primary
Page 1
threats to bald eagles in Washington are habitat degradation and
human disturbance.
This is a cooperative management plan between WDW and Yukimori
Moji. The purpose of this management plan is to create site-
specific management procedures that maintain a productive bald
eagle nesting territory, and integrates the property interests and
goals of the landowner.
SITE DESCRIPTION
Location
The Dosewallips bald eagle nesting territory is located n
Jefferson County south of the mouth of the Dosewallips River
(Figure 1). The nest trees are located up Walker Creek on the
west side of Highway 101. Access to the territory is made by
turning west on a gravel-dirt road approximately 0.6 miles (1 km)
south of the bridge over the Dosewallips River. Turn right at
the intersection about 300 feet (91 m) up this road, then travel
about 750 feet (229 m) and pull off on the right side of the
road. At this location is an excellent observing location
looking north into the two nest trees.
Site Characteristics
The nest trees are located in the Walker Creek draw within a
remnant riparian area, approximately 1000 feet (305 m) west of
the Hood Canal saltwater shoreline. Nest tree ~1 is a solitary
tree south of the remnant riparian strip, 53" (1.3 m) diameter at
breast height (dbh) Douglas fir. Nest tree #2 is on the northern
edge of the remnant riparian strip leaning south, about 36# (0.9
m) dbh Douglas fir. Nest tree ~1 is on Yukimori Moji's property
and nest tree #2 is on the adjacent parcel to the north.
Current Land Use
Yukimori Moji owns 26 acres in the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of
Section 2, T. 25 N., R. 2 W., and another approximately 36 acres
(14 hec) in the NW 1/4 of Section 11, T. 25 N., R. 2 W. The land
has been clearcut logged within the last 15 years. The Moji
ownership within Section 2 is identified as one tax parcel in the
Assessor's office. There is a recorded survey from December 30,
1985 where this tax parcel in Section 2 is divided into five
tracts.
Some of the names and addresses of land owners in the vicinity of
the DosewallipS bald eagle nest are listed in Appendix 2.
Page 2
EAGLE ECOLOGY
Historic Use and Productivity
The Dosewallips bald eagle nesting territory was first discovered
in 1985. Nest tree #1 was located in 1985 and was present as of
1991. The nest in nest tree #1 was present from 1985 through
1989, and was not present during 1990 and 1991. Nest tree #2 was
discovered in 1989 with the nest present through 1991. Nest tree
#1 as utilized during 1985 through 1988 and nest tree #2 was
utilized during 1989 through 1991. The nesting territory has
been very productive raising young eaglets each year from 1985
through 1991 (Table 1).
The nesting territories north of Dosewallips along Dabob Bay and
Hood Canal have had extremely low productivity. There are two
known bald eagle nesting territories on the Bolton Peninsula, six
on t'he Toandos Peninsula (to the east of Bolton Peninsula) and
one territory in Quilcene Bay. The five year productivity
history of these territories is lower than the recovery goals,
only 0.56 young per occupied territory year and 44% success
(Table 2) .
Nesting Biology
Few specifics are known about eagle behavior at the Dosewallips
site. However, information collected at other bald eagle nest
sites in the Pacific Northwest provides the foil_owing information
relevant to management of this site:
Nest Chronology - In Washington courtship and nest building
activities occur during January and February. Eggs are laid in
late March to early April (usually one or two, but occasionally
up to four eggs are laid). Hatching occurs in late-April to mid-
MaY after a 35 day incubation period. After 10 to 12 weeks, the
eaglets will take their first flights. Eaglets usually leave the
nest in late-July to mid-August, often remaining in the vicinity
for an additional month.
Bald eagles are extremely sensitive to disturbance during the
early part of the nest cycle. Disturbance from activities such
as land clearing, logging, helicopter use, vehicle use, and home
construction can cause adults to abandon sites prior to egg
laying or later may flush them from nests and expose the eggs or
eaglets to the elements and predators. As the time of fledging
approaches, these disturbances may frighten young from the nest
before they can fly. From late summer until the following
January, adult eagles are less sensitive to activities near nests
Page 3
as they tend to occupy peripheral areas of the home range to a
greater degree or leave the area entirely.
Home Range - Eagles occupy ranges that may cover up to 10 square
miles (26 square kilometers), depending on the availability of
prey and the quality of nesting, roosting, and foraging habitats.
Territories, or core 'areas of a home range, are defended from
adjacent nesting pairs of eagles.
Nest and Perch Trees - Eagles usually select large, overly-mature
conifers for nest trees. Trees with large gnarled limbs or
strong crotches in the upper branches provide ideal platforms for
supporting nests. Eagles tend to reuse the same nest from year
to year but often maintain at least one alternate nest on the
territory. Though alternate nests may appear to be abandoned,
eagles often return to use these nests after a few years of non-
use.
Old-growth and mature conifers, and large snags are also
important for perching, roosting, and foraging. Perching may
occur throughout the home range in trees which facilitate food
acquisition and consumption, mating display, territorialism, nest
defense and efficient thermoregulation. Such trees are typically
in elevated areas in close proximity to food and allow for good
visual access to adjacent habitat. Roosting usually occurs in
trees with well developed canopies or in locations that afford
protection from rain and prevailing winds. Foraging trees are
located near the food source, which is often the_ body of water
nearest the nest.
Prey - Eagle food habits are extremely varied, but typically
include fish, waterfowl, seabirds, carrion, and occasionally
small mammals. Eagles forage opportunistically and diets tend to
vary in response to changes in prey availability.
NOTE: The sections entitled Introduction, Site Description, and
Eagle Ecology were drafted by WDW and Mr. Moji as landowner
neither accepts nor denies the facts set forth in those sections.
PROPOSED LAND USE
Yukimori Moji states that the subject property consists of 62
acres, divided into 11 parcels ranging from 5.01 to 7.22 acres,
and that each parcel has been zoned for single family residences.
Mr. Moji has applied for septic permit renewals prior to proposed
sale of some of the parcels.
Page 4
MANAGEMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Known aspects of the ecology of bald eagles allow for the
determination of an Eagle Management Area (EMA) around the
Dosewallips nesting territory. The EMA is designed to maintain
the integrity of the territory by protecting the existing eagle
nest tree, primary perch trees, foraging areas, and potential
habitat.
Protected area - The intent of this area is to maintain habitat
'.. d to eliminate human disturbance. Within the
as it exists an ..... ~'-.~+ies that result in permane~nt
protected area, numan
the habitat and/or disturbance to the eagles
alterations to ..... .__~..~ but are not limited
shall not occur. These ac~lvl~les
rin home construction, road building, trail
to, land clea ~g' . . ...... ~ ~' earns and fireworks.
development, us_e o~..cn.eml~c=a_l_s~.,~U%~d~o~tions of the Protected
Table 3 identifies ~ne Dounu~i~=
Area.
Conditioned Area - The intent of this area is to minimize
disturbance that could disrupt eagle activities within the EMA
and to maintain some habitat components outside of the Protected
Area. This will include time and/or activity provisions and
requirements for retaining large trees at certain locations.
Table 4 identifies the area and conditions of the Conditioned
Area ·
Human use activities including, but not limited-to, exterior home
construction, land clearing, road building, timber harvest,
aircraft use, use of chemicals, use of fireworks, and off-road
vehicle use will not be allowed within the conditioned area
between January 1 and June 30 each year. This is necessary to
ensure that human disturbances do not result in nest abandonment
or nesting failure. During the month of June equipment may be
used for durations of not more than three days for activities
related to septic systems and utilities.
EXEMPTIONS
No provision of this plan shall be construed to create any
responsibility on the part of Mr. Yukimori Moji ~for land use
activities conducted by adjacent landowners on their own
properties.
Vehicular use on the existing road shown in Figure 2 will not be
subject to anY restrictions.
Page 5
Emergency activities necessary to protect public health and
safety are not restricted in any way.
MONITOR AND REVIEW
Implementation of the plan as it relates to the property will
begin when the landowner agrees to the plan. If the WDW and the
landowner cannot agree to the plan, the landowner can refer the
plan to the Bald Eagle Oversight Committee or file a formal
appeal as outlined in WAC 232-12-197.
This plan will be subject to the following review and
amendment procedures. This plan may be reviewed at the request
of either the landowner or WDW. The review shall determine
whether the plan requires amendment due to changed eagle or
landowner circumstances. During the review process, WDW or the
landowner may propose amendments to the original plan. If WDW
and the landowner cannot agree on any proposed amendments, WAC
232-12-292(7.2)-(7-4) shall apply. In the event of a dispute
over an amendment proposal by WDW, WDW agrees that the landowner,
by agreeing to this plan, does not waive any appropriate defenses
in a formal appeal, including, but not limited to, lack of
reasonable notice of potential land use restrictions prior to
purchase of the subject property. The existing plan shall remain
effective and binding until WDW and the landowner agree to any
proposed amendments, or the dispute is resolved pursuant to WAC
232-12-292 (7.2)-(7.4) .
This plan shall become ineffective should the-Dosewallips #879
Bald Eagle Territory be unoccupied by bald eagles for five
consecutive years, beginning as of April 15, 1992. WDW shall
make the determination of occupancy.
At all times, it is the landowner's responsibility to notify WDW
of any proposed activities, on the landowner's property and
within his control, that may materially and directly affect eagle
habitat or eagle use on the territory covered by this plan.
The conditions of the plan do not supercede local, county, state,
federal, or other regulations that are related to environmental
protection (e.g. Shoreline Management Act, SEPA process).
The land owners are encouraged to partiCipate in monitoring eagle
activities and to keep written records of information that would
be useful in refining the plan. All bald eagle nests are
monitored by WDW. This monitoring is generally performed with
aircraft to determine eagle presence during April (occupancy) and
results of th'eir breeding effort during June (productivity) ·
Page 6
Monitoring is also used to assess any changes affecting nest
sites, including development and impacts to eagles. In sites
with management plans, it is also used to assure plan compliance.
COMPLIANCE
Failure to comply with the plan constitutes a misdemeanor as set
forth in RCW 77.21.010. Bald eagles and their habitats are
protected by other state and federal laws (Appendix 1).
Page 7
Table 1. Dosewallips bald eagle nesting productivity
from 1985 to 1991
results
Nest #1 Nest #2
1985 1 Young
1986 1 Young
1987 2 Young
1988 2 Young
1989 Unoccupied
1990 Nest gone
1991 Nest gone
1992 Nest gone
2 Young
2 Young
1 Young
Nest present
Penins , Bolton Peninsula and Quilcene Bay
eagle nesting productivity results from 1986 to 1991.
TERRITORY 19 8 6 1987 1988 198 9 1990
bald
1991
Thorndyke
Brown Point
East Toandos
Hazel Point
Tabook Point
Camp Harmony
Bolton Penin
Broad Spit
Quilcene Bay
Pt Whitney
Unocc
Failure Unocc
2 Yng
1 Yng
Failure Failure Unocc
Failure Failure 1 Yng
1 Yng 1 Yng
1 Yng Failure Failure 1 Yng
Failure Failure Failure Inact
1 Yng 1 Yng
1 Yng
Failure Failure Failure 1 Yng
2 Yng
1 Yng 2 Yng 2 Yng 1 Yng
0.56 young produced each year per occupied territory
Failure
Failure
Failure
Failure
Failure
Failure
Failure
Failure
1 Yng
Unoccup
44% success rate
Table 3. Protected Area for the Dosewallips bald eagle nesting
territory.
Yukimori Moji Ownership:
The Protected Area will include the entire portions of Tract 6
and Tract 7 north of the gravel-dirt road (Figure 2). The
Protected Area will also include a 450 foot (137 m) radius buffer
around nest tree #1 within Tract 5 with the exception of the
access easement along the eastern boundary of Tract 5 (Figure 2).
The remainder of Tract 5, beyond the 450 foot buffer zone, is not
included within the Protected Area. Mr. Moji agrees to notify
future land owners of Tracts 5, 6 and 7 of the land use
restrictions required by this plan.
Within the protected area, human activities that result in
permanent alterations to the habitat and/or disturbance to the
eagles shall not occur. These activities include, but are not
limited to, land clearing, home construction, road building,
trail development, use of chemicals, use of firearms and
fireworks.
Table 4. Conditioned Area for the Dosewallips bald eagle nesting
territory.
Yukimori Moji Ownership:
The Conditioned Area will extend 800 feet (244 m) from nest tree
#1 (Figure 2) .
Within the Conditioned Area, land altering activities and
exterior construction of buildings will be prohibited from
January 1 through June 30. During the month of June, motorized
equipment may be used for durations of not more than three days
for activities related to septic systems and utility installation
and repairs.
With the exception of two openings, a border of vegetation at
least 15 feet (4.6 m) high has been established along the
northern edge of the existing gravel - dirt road within Tract 5
(Figure 2). The landowner or his agents shall not remove, cut,
spray, or otherwise hinder the growth or survival of this border
of vegetation [excluding the eastern 100 feet (30 m) of the road
within Tract 5]. Each of the two openings in this border shall
be planted with ten evenly spaced Douglas fir trees (total of
twenty trees). The trees shall be a minimum of 3-5 feet tall
and shall b~ planted between November 1, 1992, and February 28,
1993. The trees that die must be replaced with live trees until
there is a continuous visual buffer 15 feet (4.6 m) high. The
tree planting required above is not an additional prerequisite to
development activity by the landowner.
./
?£gurn 2. Lo=at,on of Da~ewa~ ~ ~" bald e~ag!a nest~ ~g aerr~tory-
5.0 tu
/
· "- / ZO$,Bg'
/ ~ / /
· ~ .
"7.
/
/ /
/ -./
/ '-..Tx 3 $.0 ~.
/
-.
GHLAND'S
618..50'
50ZIO[OIt
TAX 42
~..86 cz.
w-
50E
Figure 2. Proteoted $_~ea amd Conditioned Area for
APPEND
· . .
Pro:ac: on o: Bald £agies n Wasm nE:on
RCW 77.!6.!20 -ak£n~ of ~rocec:ed ~'£1dl:fe--Destruc:;¢n of nes[s cr
ag_rs . . . iC is un~a~.fu~ co nun£, ;zsn ~cr, possess , 'or control ~rotec:ed
~zidlife...or co desc'rov or possess [he nests or eEEs o¢...Drotected
· -'ild li fa.
RCW 77.08.0!0 (7) Definition of "to hun="--"an effort [c kill
capture, cr harass a ~'iid animal or bird."
, in iure,
RCW 77 ~ 0~0 ('~ J person comr. itting a violation o
involving prcce~t°~'- . ~'i~d!i~e. . ~s guiicy c~ ~- misdemeanor and .~-a;i. be
punished for eec~,, of;arise, by. a fine of ~c:, !ess' c~.n,,~ ~..c~, cz '~v
~:~risonmant for not more than 90 days in the county ~a[i, cz by both.
For :he purposes cf RCW 77.!6.!20, a kill' or harassmen: occurs when a
. .
kno~.m nes[cr bird :s the ob~ec'., of neg,~gen[ destruction c- d~s[urb-
anne. in th~ case cf kno~'n nest si~es, an effort must be =ada tc
buffer :he ~:[e frc~., ir.~ac[s ~'hich r. av resu!: in nes[ des:rut- on,
breedihg =-iiu ign ~ ru~ o no z-aa cz
~ re, er s ific-n[ dis -ion f i behavi
~ne Forest.~ractices Act (Ch-::er~ .2_ .C) prov~de~_ f-r~ rules and
reguia[ions concerning :ores[ practices and contains severe: -e~ula-
:ions oertai,,i.,s ~c :imber removal in areas con'aining~ ~ :~rea-aned, ~'ild-.
ir:e, cz habi-a~ c= such. -' :s to your benefi[ to_f=,'~:ar._ za your-
self ~'i:h this A-- :: you a-e z. ianning -nv t~ber remov=i
State Environ=eh:a! ?c!;~v Ac' (-~EPA)
The purpose o: S--PA rs.to se: forth procedures fcr al! agent;es co
improve and codrdina[e plans, functions, programs, and resources :-
order tc create and =ain~ain cond: -
,:ions under '-'~ich both man ond nature
can axis t.
Shoreline Hana~emen: Act (SY~) (RC~ 90.58)
/he Shoreline .U. anaEe:enc ;.ct c= !971 has both p!anni.,~ ,:,,d .etu!atory
functions. Shore!;ne land use :inns are developed and permits are
issued fcr ccns~ ~ ' : - - -
,.stent ,an~ uses .-. those ~:eas. The
marine ~'aEer area~ of the saa~o,_ .e-reams ~'ith a mean annua~- :~ou o:, 20
cfs or more and tc lakes larger than 20 acres. !t-aDD!les 'c shore-
lands extending !and~'ard 200 :eat from the ordinary high ~'a[er =ark and
[o ail marahea~ boer, s~'amoa, :!coduavs, river
_
· Appencix '". :]am,.. :nc amCresses c.= some c,'~ !anmowners
/' in zne vici~. ~,: ~ %he Dosewaiiips bald eagle
~" ~=~ing %err~ .
:Y
~ax 49
This ~s zhe ownershi: vhaa nest zree ~2 is on
Henry !'~e' son
8!i! S. 2!6th ~1
Seaa'c ie. VA 9S195
502023011
5arri,' L. Swanson & Cherie A. Swanson
Rt. i Bo>: !180
Fo~ks WA 08~': !
=... ,_-. Wayne xoli~an
502023014 & Box 4 -
~ - ~,.;a c,~ 3'~,0
502023016
~= ~= .zhe ownership %ha% is direcnly north of
the nest zrees
Washington £ta.ze -arks