Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM011397TttE HEART OF TttE OLYMPIC PENINSULA[ District No. 1 Commissioner: District No. 2 Commissioner: District No. 3 Commissioner: Daniel Harpole, Member Glen Huntingford, Member Richard Wojt, Chairman Clerk of the Board: Director of Public Services: Deputy Director of Public Services: Lorna L. Delaney Gary A. Rowe David Goldsmith MINUTES Week of January 13, 1997 The Chairman called the meeting to order at the appointed time in the presence of Commissioner Glen Huntingford and Commissioner Dan Harpole. COMMISSIONERS BRIEFING SESSION APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Huntingford moved to approve the minutes of the January 3 special meeting and the January 6, 1997 regular meeting as presented. Commissioner Harpole seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. Shirley Solomon re: Update on "Long Live the Kings Program" in Hood Canal: Shirley Solomon updated the Board on this regional program to promote awareness and educate people about salmon. Al Scalfasked how this organization fits in with the work being done by volunteer organiza- tions? Shirley Solomon explained that this group works in partnership with the Hood Canal Coordinat- ing Council Salmon Enhancement group in areas south of the Hood Canal Bridge. In response to a question from Commissioner Huntingford, Ms. Solomon explained that Long Live the Kings has, and will be engaged, in the political process from time to time as needed. The Board for Long Live the Kings has a broad representation including people from industry and the business world. Board a) b) c) d) e) g) h) I) J) Appointment of Individual Commissioners to Serve on Various Boards and Committees: The members concurred that the following appointments be approved: Developmental Disability Advisory Board Economic Development Council Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) Law and Justice Council Olympic Province Advisory Committee Parks Advisory Board Peninsula Regional Services Network (RSN) Security Advisory Board Total Quality Management (TQM) Steering Committee Airport Planning Committee Commissioner Wojt Commissioner Harpole All three Board members Commissioners Wojt and Harpole Commissioner Wojt Commissioners Wojt and Harpole All three Board members Commissioner Harpole Commissioner Huntingford Commissioner Huntingford Page 1 Commissioners Meeting Minutes Week of January 13, 1997 PUBLIC SERVICES BRIEFING: Public Services Director Gary Rowe reported that the advertisement for new members to be appointed to the reconstituted Planning Commission will be ready for publication soon. It is anticipated that the Board will be interviewing and making appointments to that Commission by February. Regarding Comprehensive Plan information being made available on the County's Internet Home Page, Gary Rowe reported that there are constraints on staff time for this work. Possibly the GMA maps will be made available on the Home Page. There is a workshop on lot consolidation issues this afternoon at 3 p.m. Commissioner Huntingford asked about the budget appropriation requests and how the budgets are tracking? Gary Rowe reported that the Auditor will be able to answer any questions at the hearing this at~ernoon regarding these requests and the current status of the 1996 department budgets. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: The following items were discussed: The reconstitution of the Planning Commission and a current member taking offense to the statement that the Planning Commis- sion held up the Comprehensive Plan; a request that the maps for the 3 p.m. workshop be put up as soon as possible so the public can review them before the meeting; actions taken by the Board on the Hensel property and the problems with water drainage in that area; (Public Works Director Klara Fabry reported that the technical solution implemented in this area didn't work. Public Works is working with Ryan Tillman on a new solution); the diversity in the community and how that has impacted the job the Planning Commission has to do; the previous Commissioners making appointments to the Planning Commission that did not take into account the diversity of the community; the job of the Planning Commission being an emotional and difficult one; the discussion continued regarding how and ifa new Planning Commission will be able to do the necessary work on the Comprehensive Plan in a timely manner; and the need for Airport Advisory Committee membership including representatives from the Tri Area and the Quimper communities. APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE CONSENT AGENDA: Commissioner Huntingford moved to delete item 11 and to approve and adopt the' balance of the Consent Agenda as presented. Commissioner Harpole seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous votel 1. RESOLUTION NO. 5-97 re: Cancellation of Uncollectible Personal Property Taxes 2. AGREEMENT re: Domestic Violence Services; Prosecuting Attorney's Office; East Jefferson County Domestic Violence Sexual Assault Program 3. AGREEMENT re: Reimbursement of Expenses Related to Medicaid Administrative Activities; State Department of Social and Health Services (D. S.H.S.) 4. AGREEMENT re: Power and Data Wiring for District Court Remodel; Hanson Electric 5. AGREEMENT re: Cabinets for Permit Center Lobby Remodel; Little and Little Construction 6. Rescind Approval of Shoreline Development Permit, #SDP94-0008; Use of a Structure as an Aquaculture Support Facility; Walter Pederson, Applicant 7. Final Short Plat Approval, #SUB95-0001; To Divide 20 Acres into 4 Recreational/Residential Lots; Located off of Flagler Road, Marrowstone Island; Robert and Helen Sperry, Applicant 8. Application for Dance License; January 1 through December 31, 1997; Port Ludlow Resort & Conference Center 9. Accept Resignation of Jefferson County Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Member; Anthony J. Turner, Jr. 10. Thank You Letters for Work Performed in Times of Emergency During the Recent Extreme Weather Conditions; Jefferson County Public Works Department, Jefferson County Sheriff's Office and Port Townsend Fire Department and All Jefferson County Fire Districts 11. DELETE Letters Regarding the Commissioners Decision to Combine the Shoreline and Planning Commission and to Reconstitute the Planning Commission; Planning Cormnission Members and Shoreline Commission Members (See next item in Minutes.) Letters Regarding the Commissioners Decision to Combine the Shoreline and Planning Commission and to Reconstitute the Planning Commission; To All Current Planning Commission Members and Shoreline Commission Members: Commissioner Huntingford stated that he under- stands that the time commitment was not put in this letter because they are being sent to the current Page 2 Commissioners Meeting Minutes Week of January 13, 1997 Planning Commission and Shoreline Commission members and they know the time commitment involved. Commissioner Harpole asked why the wording which says the new Planning Commission will be composed of seven or nine members was included in the letter? Chairman Wojt explained that the Commissioners need to decide how many members will be on the new Commission and that hasn't been done yet. Commissioner Harpole moved to approve the letter. Chairman Wojt seconded the motion. Chairman called for a vote on the motion. Commissioner Harpole and Chairman Wojt voted for the motion. Commissioner Huntingford voted the against the motion. The motion carded. BUSINESS FROM COUNTY DEPARTMENTS PLANNING AND PERMIT CENTER Request for Six Month Extension of Short Plat, #SUB95-0040; To Divide 20 Acres Into 4 Residential Lots; Located West of Gardiner Community Center and South of Highway 101; Thomas Finnerty, Proponent: Al Scalfreported that this request is to extend this short plat for an additional six months to allow utilities to be put in. Commissioner Huntingford moved to approve the request. Commissioner Harpole seconded the motion which carded by a unanimous vote. Discussion re: Interim Forest Land Ordinance Comments and Preparation: Community Development Director Al Scalf reported that currently the 1995 Forestlands Ordinance and maps are in effect. Certain sections of that ordinance were found invalid by the Growth Management Hearings Board. The County entered into mediation with the appellants on those sections and a Memorandum of Understanding was developed. The MOU totally amends the '95 ordinance. Staff prepared a proposed ordinance in accordance with the MOU and the Board held a public hearing on it. There were specific issues the staff brought before the Board on that proposed ordinance. He asked for direction from the Board on the formation and timing ora new interim ordinance. He then reviewed the maps that indicate the changes to the original ordinance and noted that written comments received are in the Board's packets. The Clerk of the Board reported that a comment was received from the Hoh Tribe after the comment deadline. It came in at 4:29 p.m. on January 7, 1997 and the deadline was 5:00 p.m. on January 6, 1997. Commissioner Huntingford stated that when a cutoff date for comments is established, it must be adhered to. Commissioner Harpole noted that this Forestland Ordinance will become part of the Comprehensive Plan and that will go through another review by the Planning Commission and approval by the Board. Al Scalf explained that the proposed ordinance will be an Interim Ordinance which the MOU directs will be incorporated into the overall general review of the Comprehensive Plan. The Tribe will have an opportunity to comment on the ordinance as part of the Comprehensive Plan review. The Board concurred that the comment from the Hoh Tribe not be accepted. Chairman Wojt asked what happens to a parcel that doesn't fit the designation criteria, but is mapped as being designated? There is concern that it would cost a property owner a lot of money to correct a mapping error. Al Scalf reported that during the month of December they were made aware of three parcels that were mapped incorrectly. These mapping corrections were made administratively. A written comment was received from Lorna Ward in Quilcene who has a 40 acre parcel which was mapped as being designated. After reviewing the record, it was found that the parcel had been subdivided, so it didn't meet the criteria and administrative correction was made. Chairman Wojt asked what procedures would be required if a parcel is mapped incorrectly? Al Scalf reported that Section 6.3 of the proposed ordinance allows for a petition for removal, within 120 days, for any incorrect designation or mapping error. Chairman Wojt asked what would happen if a property owner doesn't petition within the 120 days? Al Scalfexplained that until the Board formally adopts an interim ordinance mapping questions can be handled administratively, however, once the ordinance is passed, Section 6.20.2 outlines a process for making corrections. This process goes through the Hearing Examiner with a recommenda- tion to the Board. Chairman Wojt asked if a mapping error was made by the County, and not discovered for several years, would it have to go before the Hearing Examiner? Al Scalfreported that the way the ordinance is Page 3 Commissioners Meetin8 Minutes Week of January 13~ 1997 written, the property owners would have to pay the expense to go through the Hearing Examiner process to change the mapping error. Senior Planner John Holgate explained that the interim Ordinance has a 120 day period for corrections to be brought up and made to the mapping. When the Comprehensive Forestlands chapter of the Comprehensive Plan is finished, there will be a review period for 6 to 7 months when corrections can be made. People will be able to contact the Planning Department with errors during this review period. The Board has the discretion, even after the Comprehensive Plan review process, to allow the Hearing Examiner to hear several requests gathered by the Planning Department as a group. This could be an administrative presentation on behalf of the Planning Department to correct errors and the applicants wouldn't be charged for that process. David Cunningham, Pope Resources, stated that they have some parcels that they feel are incorrectly mapped. They assumed that if the County adopts the ordinance the 120 day period would go into effect and that is how they would pursue requesting their corrections. They are concerned that some property owners, who feel their parcels were incorrectly mapped, have already had an administrative decision that they were incorrectly mapped and the maps have been changed. It's important to treat everyone the same way. Paul McIlrath, Chief Civil Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, explained that during the mediation process on this ordinance, the DNR was concerned, that since the designation is determined by criteria, not by mapping, that corrections to the mapping be handled without penalty to the property owner. There are two separate issues, one for mapping errors where a parcel should not have been mapped as designated (because their property does not meet the criteria), and one for parcels that meet all of the criteria, but the property owner doesn't want their property designated. Commissioner Harpole asked about the comment from Craig Jones about parcels in the Shine area. Al Scalfreported that there are several parcels in question, which have not been removed from designation, because they meet the criteria for designation. Commissioner Harpole asked if the criteria addresses areas where a water system is developed? Al Scalfread the criteria (page 8) which include one that says "a majority of the parcel lies outside any community water system service area." Chairman Wojt pointed out that the whole County is covered by community water service areas, so this criteria won't work. He felt this criteria referred to areas where community water is actually being supplied and pipes have been installed in the ground. David Cunningham reported that the water system is within these Shine area properties and there is information in the record that says that it is within the PUD service area boundary. Since there are many criteria for mapping, there needs to be a fair way, before and at, er the ordinance is adopted, to determine which parcels are correctly designated and which ones aren't. Gary Rowe reported that the goal has been to have mapping that is as accurate as possible and that is why the 120 day period was put in the ordinance. Commissioner Harpole asked if it is possible to develop a map, using the criteria, that is as accurate as possible in response to the testimony presented? Then through the Comprehensive Plan review process others will have the opportunities to have corrections made without any cost. Gary Rowe suggested that the Board consider giving the Planning Department staffthe administrative discretion to make some mapping changes, when the criteria obviously haven't been met. Al Scalfthen asked for the Board concurrence with some changes staffhas made to the proposed ordinance: · Page 8, item 3 - Half mile radius around urban growth areas, and rural centers. The Planning staffis proposing to include the Master Planned resort boundary and then go a half mile beyond that. Gary Rowe reported that this was clearly the intent during the mediation discussions. This boundary was set by the interim ordinance. The Board concurred that the Master Planned Resort be added. · Maps - there is a 1995 map and a proposed map. Maps change if the criteria for the designation are changed and the Planning Department recommends that new maps be issued showing the changes. Chairman Wojt asked if the map or the criteria is the driver for designation? Al Scalf answered that the criteria is the driver. Gary Rowe reported that the final Comprehensive Plan .VOL Page 4 23 2,1 Commissioners Meetin8 Minutes Week of January 13, 1997 and the ordinances put into effect, will be zoning. Zoning will then drive the designation of a parcel. The Board concurred that new maps be developed. Al Scalfthen reiterated that the staffwill produce a new map with the new ordinance, which will be adopted by the Board and included in the Comprehensive Plan review process. He then noted that in the '95 ordinance subdivision was allowed for residential purposes (40 acres into two 20's and 80 acres into two 40's). He asked the Board if they want to allow this residential subdivision? Commissioner Huntingford stated this wasn't discussed in the mediation. Gary Rowe stated that the staff recommenda- tion is that this type of residential development be allowed. There wasn't any discussion of removing this during the mediation. The Board concurred that this matter be left as it is in the ordinance. This ordinance will be placed on next week's agenda for possible adoption at 10:30 a.m. during the Planning Department Business. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR'S BRIEFING: Public Works Director, Klara Fabry, reported that the current estimate of damage from the winter storm is $2.2 million. The Board will be meeting with the Public Works Engineers on Thursday and she asked if they have any specific projects they would like to discuss. Commissioner Huntingford stated that he would like to discuss the issues raised in the meeting in Brinnon last week. He asked that the information on the drainage for the Schoenfeld Plat be reviewed. Klara Fabry reported that the Public Works Department has committed to going back to the Brinnon community with information on the financial savings to the County of moving the County shop out of Brinnon. Commissioner Huntingford stated that he would like to review any information to be presented before a meeting is arranged with the community. Chairman Wojt noted that there has been a request that the County do snow removal on a portion (approximately 300 feet) of the Forest Service road along the Duckabush River, to provide access to several homes in the area. It was stated that the Forest Service would let the County do this work on their road. New Organizational Chart for Public Works: Klara Fabry reported that it is a requirement that an organizational chart for the Public Works Department be adopted by the Board and be forwarded to the County Road Administration Board by January 15. There are two changes from the previously adopted organizational chart: 1) the Information Services Department was removed, and 2) a permanent lead position was identified for the Hadlock Shop. This lead position would improve the safety of the Road Department. Commissioner Huntingford asked how this position will be filled? Klara Fabry reported that the Union contract identifies the process for filling the lead position. Chairman Wojt stated that how the Public Services Director's position fits into the operation of the County hasn't been determined yet. The Board will be discussing this tomorrow in a Public Services meeting and will make a determination on this organization chart after that meeting. The next day~ Commissioner Huntingford moved to authorize the Chairman to sign the Public Works organizational chart for 1997 as presented. Commissioner Harpole seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. Lois Smith re: Fiscal Agent for Community Network: Juvenile Services Director Lois Smith reported that the fiscal agent for the Community Network must be a public agency. The ESD was serving this function, but they are no longer. She asked if the Board would allow the County to be the fiscal agent for the Community Network? Jean Baldwin, County's representative on the Community Network, stated that the fiscal agent needs be familiar with handling this type of financial work. David Specter, Health and Human Services Director, reported that this is the last network in the State that doesn't have a plan. The Health and Human Services Department is willing to do what they can to help move this project forward, by contributing staff time and support. Commissioner Huntingford moved to approve the County being the Fiscal Agent for the Community Network. Commissioner Harpole seconded the motion which carried by a unanimous vote. The . VOL ' ~ Page 5 Commissioners Meeting Minutes Week ofJanuar7 13, 1997 Community Network Board will work on the requirements for being the Fiscal Agent. The discussion continued regarding the type of support the Health and Human Services Department could provide; the duties of the fiscal agent; and the programs that are being held up because the plan is not completed. The Board directed that the Health & Human Services Department be the Department designated to handle the Fiscal Agent work for the Community Network. HEARING re: Budget Appropriations for Various County Departments: Commissioner Huntingford asked if anyone has done a review of the department budget to determine if these requests are necessary. Auditor Donna Eldddge reported that her office staff, watches the department budgets. Accountant Mary Baldridge added that they check each department's budgets for money left in salary lines that would cover a shortfall in other lines of their budget. She reported that the request for $10,000 from Operating Transfers for the Health and Human Services Department (reimbursement for spoiled vaccine) is not necessary because there is enough in another budget to cover this expense. Commissioner Harpole asked about the request for the Mental Health Fund? Gary Rowe explained that more tax revenues came in than were budgeted and this request is the transfer to put these tax dollars into the Mental Health Fund budget. The Chairman opened the hearing for public comment. David Specter asked how his department would be reimbursed for the $10,000 if the operating transfer is deleted from this appropriation request? Mary Baldridge explained that there is enough in the Non- Departmental Fund to cover paying this amount to the Health and Human Services Department. Commissioner Huntingford asked about the District Court request for $10,0007 Gary Rowe explained that the Court is asking for more funding to cover increased expenses. Hearing no further comments for or against the proposed appropriations/extensions, the Chairman closed the hearing. Commissioner Huntingford moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 6-97 deleting the $10,000 from Operating Transfers and authorizing the balance of the budget appropriations/extensions as requested. Commissioner Harpole seconded the motion which carded by a unanimous vote. Assessor Jack Westerman re: Property Tax Reform: Assessor Jack Westerman reported that in the 1995 Legislative Session, the Legislature passed a 5% reduction in the 1996 State property tax levy which becomes the base amount for the 106% calculation. Because the same reduction was not approved for 1996, and the way the calculations are done, this will mean that the 1997 levy rate will be the largest annual increase in the history of the State of Washington. He proposed a resolution for the Board to send a message to the State Legislature to pass legislation that will roll back the increase in the State property tax levy. Commissioner Huntingford moved to approve and sign RESOLUTION NO. 7-97 encouraging the State Legislature to pass legislation in the first two weeks of the legislative session that will roll back the increase in the State property tax levy. Commissioner Harpole seconded the motion which carded by a unanimous vote. Workshop On Lots Of Record: After reviewing the information presented and discussing the issues involved, Commissioner Harpole moved to direct Planning Department staff'to obtain copies of the interim ordinances from Thurston and Clark counties that deal with lots of record and to collect information on setting a 10,000 square foot size minimum for platted lots. Commissioner Huntingford seconded the motion which carded by a unanimous vote. The meeting was recessed at the end of the scheduled business and reconvened on Tuesday .VOL Page 6 Commissioners Meeting Minutes Week of January 13, 1997 morning aiter the Public Services meeting. All three Board members were present for the following business. Solid Waste Study Recommendations: Frank Hall explained that this workshop was set up with the Board and the members of the Solid Waste Advisory Committee to discuss the recommendations resulting from the R.W. Beck Solid Waste Analysis report. The Board first reviewed the recommenda- tions at their meeting on December 23, 1996. Long Haul Contract be put out to bid (Recommendation 1): The Public Works staff has been in contact with RDC (the current contract holder) to identify the issues around the long haul contract so that the RFP can be put together. The current contract requires a decision to continue it by July 1, 1997. Chairman Wojt asked what type of information is being sought? Frank Hall answered they are asking that inforfl~ation be provided on how to bring down the cost of hauling, ways to improve the hauling, etc. Klara Fabry stated that the negotiation process with RDC will not preclude the SWAC recommen- dation to go out for an RFP on the long hauling. Commissioner Huntingford asked what the cost per ton is for hauling? Frank Hall answered that it is about $28.00/ton which includes short haul trucking from the County transfer station to the rail terminal and then railroad hauling to the dump site. Commissioner Huntingford asked how Jefferson County's fees compare to other counties? Klara Fabry noted that our overall fee (transport and disposal)is lower than other counties. Commissioner Huntingford asked if the trucking fee includes the rent on the trailer? Frank Hall advised that the fees do include the rental of the trailer. Bill Perka, Solid Waste Advisory Committee, stated that the RFP is a way to let the current contract holder know that there may be competition and hopefully they will give their best bid for the services. Many options for providing these services are being reviewed including looking at revision of the current contract, the County working with the City on this issue, and possibly an RFP issued before July, with notification to RDC. Maintain transfer station operations (Recommendation 2): Board concurred that the County keep transfer station operations. The Public Works Department should prepare a site plan, with SWAC involvement (Recommendation 5): The site plan would provide information to look at alternative uses on the site and review how the areas of the site are being used. Commissioner Huntingford asked if the alternative uses of the site would subsidize solid waste operations? He noted that he would support an inert landfill on the site. Bill Perka stated that these alternatives could be a way to provide more funding for the solid waste operations. There will need to be discussion about Solid Waste being an enterprise fund, if the tipping fees will be raised to cover the costs, possibly doing County wide district, and the need to address replacement cost of equipment. Larry Fay stated that the site is, and should be used as a unified solid waste operation and permitted in that manner. Purchase of scale and knuckleboom crane (Recommendation 7 and 8): Frank Hall reported that the processes have been started to purchase these items. There is money in the budget for both items. Moderate Risk Waste Facility (Recommendations 11, and 13): Putting the walls in is in the 1997 budget and will be done. Buying out the Port of Port Townsend was part of the original agreement and is being worked on. Close all Drop Box sites except Clearwater (Recommendation 14): Anne Sears, Public Works, stated that the SWAC recommends that all drop box sites except Clearwater be closed. Another option is to adjust the fees to eliminate the subsidy for operating these sites. Molly Pearson reported that there is an RCW that says that drop boxes should be self supportive and the fees need to cover the cost of the operation. The Clearwater drop box will have fees that cover the costs until a contract can be negotiated with a provider for that area. The Board then reviewed the operating costs, the current fees, the availability throughout the whole County of curbside services and other issues involved with these sites. Commissioner Harpole asked if there is enough useful life in the drop boxes to continue to use them for up to another year? The recommendation was to transition this closure over the next year. Commissioner Huntingford noted that his biggest concern is what people will do with their garbage if they are unhappy with curbside service. Dr. Atkins, SWAC member, added that no matter what is done, Page 7 Commissioners Meeting Minutes Week of January 13, 1997 the key is education to the public about the costs of the drop boxes, and that there is curbside service available in the whole County. Molly Pearson then reviewed a drat~ public information process. The fees will be implemented at the Clearwater drop box site as soon as possible. SWAC member Diane Perry stated that questions have been raised about the transient population and what they will do if the drop boxes are closed. The suggestion was made that the Coyle area may require a drop box just like Clearwater because of the remoteness of the area. Possibly a drop box could be opened on the Coyle during the summer months when there are campers in the area. Another option might be asking the Coyle community if they would consider operating their own drop box facility. Commissioner Huntingford noted that he would like to see an informational package put together for each community with access to a drop box. The information should include the operating costs and alternatives available for this service. Information should also be included on the costs to replace the drop box containers and equipment. He noted that the argument for closing the drop box sites could also be used for eliminating the subsidy for recycling in those areas. The SWAC recommended that the site be closed, meaning the site would be totally closed (no recycling at the site either), Bill Perka explained. The representative from Skookum noted that the recycling bins could be located elsewhere in the community. Commissioner Harpole moved that the County proceed with closing the drop boxes in ali areas, except Clearwater and Coyle, in the next six to nine month period during which time a community education program will be implemented. He is reluctant to leave this discussion open in all these communities, especially knowing that the equipment will have to be replaced soon. Chairman Wojt stated that he sees this as an educational issue since people are paying more to use the drop boxes than they will pay for curbside service. Commissioner Huntingford noted that he feels the County needs to make an effort to get this informa- tion to the communities where these drop boxes are located. He asked if there is an estimate of how much the tipping fee will go down if all of the cuts in the program are made as recommended? Anne Sears reported that the tipping fee won't go down because it should be at $163 per ton to cover the current costs. Chairman Wojt seconded the motion for further discussion. Molly Pearson then reviewed the public information process that has been drafted which include: · Informational flyers placed at every drop box · Staff'working at the drop box sites on the weekends to talk with people about the closure, the issues and the costs. A newspaper article from the Public Works Director in all the local papers regarding the reasons for closing the sites. Informational articles in all community, group, and club newspapers/letters regarding the drop box closure. Commissioner Huntingford noted that he agrees with the draf~ public information process, but he won't vote for this motion because he feels the County will spend time picking up the pieces because the public isn't being advised of this change before the action is taken. The discussion continued regarding the motion, the costs for solid waste, the need for public education. Page 8 Commissioners Meeting Minutes Week of January 13, 1997 The Chairman called for a vote on the motion. Commissioner Harpole and Chairman Wojt voted for the motion. Commissioner Huntingford voted against the motion. The motion carried. mETING .,A~O~p / . __.-.-," '~"~. 'j ',, l"' '~ ~, '" t '.4 : ATTE~: ,~ '. ~li ' , ~,~~r-,,nornak,~ Delaney, ~'~'' ' ' CqVlC ]~</' ' '~ ~ ~_._~.a Clerk of the Board Page 9 vol 29