Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSpecial Report (010) . .C ., ,~ . : . LISA PALAZZI'  - ' - 203 FOURTH AVENUE EAST SUITE 321 -. OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98501 .. ' VOICE: (360) 534-0346 · ~. FAX: (360) 534-9027 . . . . . _ Terry Milliken Madr0na Planni. 'ng and Developmenf Services." 607-A-Tyler Street . Port'To~wnsend} WA..98368 .' ..~. , -: '"- ..,- .- ... July 3,. 1995 ·. . · Report File-NUmber: · ' M95.0060... p.. Report' SUbject: .... '"'W'etlandassessment report Location' .'. .. .Larry Scott.Trail Project, approximately from the.intersection of .. 'Crutcher andSand Road,. then south-to the southem boundary of the Pollack ranch (about 2'miles), then east to cross:the drainage ... -and south again along the east side of the drainage for'about 1/8 . ·., .... ' "' .... . --m!!e,. then 'east to follow the raik0ad easement (aCross.. Discovery - --'". .... Road); trail-more or less follows ihe boundary' between Sections · '" 17 and 18,1 i.9 and 20, 30 and29, then meanders thi:0Ugh Sections ... -29 and:.32 in'a southeasterly direction, Township 30N, Range lW. Fiel'd work was' camed.'°Ut: by LiSa Palazzi, (ARCPACS certified soils specialist and wetlands specialist)on June 1'3;: i:995:. Wetlands.Were delineated.only at the' single crossing. Otherwise,. they were field:cheCked. When directlY acc. essible.(i?i, .with. permission of property owner), visUally examined from a distancei'when.not ·directly accessible,- or simply evaluated on.the aerial Photo'when n0t.'visible from the.trail..The,, approximate wetland boundaries.and: wetland 'claSses 'were marked '" .:'"...~. ' . ' on..1- ~100 scale'aerial photoS: A prelimihary.eStimate was provided on the- wetland'rating .... .-. ,.- . ... . '"" "'. i::~. ':;' ':.'! :.,,:.:-'.' "....~.' ':' " "' :." ~ . . ' : - GENERAL REGULATORY FRAM'EWORI(. ' '.: '-,- ....... , To..qmalify.as a. jurisdictional Wetland;.as defined' by ire 1987'Corps of Engineers Manual (required bY:the J~ffef',s0n.'C6Ufity'in~terim Critical.Areas-Ordinance), an area mtlst' .predominantly~ Support wetland Vegetation, midst-have hydric soils, and musthave wetland . . . "hydrology. characteristics def'med for the on site soil.type -- usually evidence or. Observation of a long-duration water table at. l'2:inches or'less.depth'. · · Accm-ding'to the most i:b'cent draft. .of the.jefferson county Interim Critical Areas Ordinance . " ?..: .-. ~ .... .-- .. Page 1 . -. .. (effective February 28,. 1994); the minlmum regulatory wetland size is 10,000 sq.ft. The wetland edge is located by evaluating the'presence Or abSence of the three parameters, then flagged in the field for subsequent survey. -- . · Once identified as jurisdictional Wetland; 'the wetland is ".rated" using the October 1991 Washington'State Wetlands Rating SYstem. The rating system combines a series of questions and a point system to determine the specific value of {he individual wetland. Depending on site specific; pre-development wetland ~vegetation, soils, hydrology and buffer Characteristics, the wetland has 'greater or lesser value and.so is affordedvarying levels of protection in the form of wetland buffers. The. higher the. rating,' the greater the buffer, ranging from a minimum of 25 feet for relatively low quality, smaller Wetlands adjacent to low intensity, deVelopment areas up to a maximum of 150 feet: for the highest quality, Or rare wetlands adjacent to high intensity " develoPment,areas.. -..-' · .i"......." ". ' . , · ~ -. The area' within the'wetland ~ind buffers 'is'generally Considered Unavailable fOr development, unless there is.no reasonable alternative..Jefferson County-inVolvement is initiated by a "triggering permit'', whiCh, generally refers, to a buiI~ng permit of some sort.' Any impacts to the wetland are regulated.-at, least bY Jefferson.County and the federal Army Corps of Eng/neers (COE). Other potentially involved agencies include the state Dept. offish and Wildlife (WDFW)~ and the DNR Natural :Heritage Program. In general, any direct impacts must be mitigated for through either' wetland creation .or enhancement program with the intent being no net loss of wetland-acreage. .. ... '- · _ , Impacts within the buffer are. regulated Only by Jeffers°n County, although the.'WDFw can become involved with setting buffer'reqUirements if they are involved in providing permits for any planned s/ream crossings.. '.- . ... OVERVIEW .' ".- .. · . · Attached-maps include ' ~" ... · .. 1) A series of six. I "=100'. scale. 1995 aerial photos of the site .(source: DeGross Aerial Mapping, Kirkl. and; WA) 2)~ On-site soil.maps (source:-'JeffersOn'coUnty scs. Soil Survey, issued in 1972 from work done 'on alphoto.base 'dated 195'1 and .1954) ., Attached Appendices include: '~ ... " . 1) A summarY.of the soil'Series deScriptions.. 2) Wetland data-form, .... Approximate wetland.boundaries are marked on the aerial Phot°. Only the wetland crossing in the NE comer of Section 19 'is .flagged in the field. 'At this time, it is'not considered necessary to survey in that crossing. "The lines provided on the. attached aerial Photo maps give. sufficient detail to.show both that the croSsing is located at a narrow point in the wetland complex and that . . ... -., .. · :.. ~ Page 2 · . . . . as coarse-loamy, mixed, non-acid, mesic Typic Udiftuvent2); the Casey silt loam, 0-8% slopes (classified as a fine, mixed, mesic Typic Albaqualfs~; the Cassolary sandy loam, (classified as a fine-loamy, mixed mesic Typic Xerochrept4); the Clallam gravelly sandy loam, 0-15%, and 15- 30% slopes (classified as a loamy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Entic'DurochreptS);' the Dick loamy sand, (classified asa mixed, mesicAlfic Xeropsamment6); the Hoypus gravelly loamy sand and sandy loam, 0-15% slopes (both clasSified, as a sandy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Typic Xerorthent?); the McMurrayPeat,'(claSsified:as aeuic, meSic Typic Medihemist~). the Mukilteo muck (classified as a dystric, mesic Typic Medihemistg); the Semiahoo muck, moderately shallow coarse-loamy, mixed, non-acid, mesic Typij. Udifluvent generally meaning the'soil is very young with n~a'fimal horizon development (mt), is a result ofper/°dic flooding activity (tiny), has a Udic moisture regime - in most years the s0il between 4 and 12 inches depth not dry for more than 90 days'(udi), has otherwise' avc~rage chamcter/stics for these soil types (typic), has a mesic temperature regime (mean annual temperature ranges fi:om 8° to 15° C (47° - 59° F), has a pH greater thanS.0 (non-ac/d), has no specific mineralogical source (mixed), has >15% sand content and <18% clay content by dry weight (.COarse-loamy). 3 Fine, mixed, raesic Typic Albaquaifs, generally meaning the s0il has an argillie (clay) horizon and has greater than 35% base saturation (aiD, is expected to have a se.~sonal high water table within approx. 12 inches of the soil surface (aqu), h~ an abrupt textural change between the argillic (clayey) B horizon and the.overlying albic or ochric horizon (db), is otherwise typical (typic), has a mesic temperature regime (mean annual temperature ranges fi:om 8° to ·1'5° C (47°', 59° F), no specific mineralogic source (m/xed), and has 35-50% clay content (fine): 4 Fine-loamy, mixed mesic Typic Xerochrept, generally meaning, soil has minimal horizon development (ept), the surface epipedon has a pale color and Iow base. saturation (°Chr), the soil has developed Under Climatic conditions of wet winters and dry summers (xer), soil properties are c~therwise typical of these soil types (typic), has a mesic temperature r~gime (mean annual t~nperature ranges from 8° t° 15° C (47° - 59° F), has no specific mineralogic source (.nfixe~d..), and has 15% sand and.18-34%.ctay by weight (tine'loamy).' · 5 Loamy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Entic Durochrept, generally meaning ~he soil has minimal horizon development (ept and critic), has a pale- .. colored, low base saturation surface horizon (ochr), has an silicate~'.emented Subsurface layer ~dur), .has a mesic temperature regime (mean annual temperature rmages fi:om 8° t6 15° C (47° - 59~ F), h~ no specific mineralogic source (mixed.), texture of the £me fraction is loam and coarse fragment content is greater than 35% (loamy-skeletal). .. 6 Mixed, mesic 'Alfic XeroP~m~raent, generally meanin~ the soil is very young with little horizon development (ent), has a sandy or loamy sand texture with low coarse fragment percentage.throughout (l~mtm), has de*eloped under climate conditiorm of wet wintem and droughty summers (xer), has some sign of leaching that indicates beginning of'development into an more mature soil type, such as having higher clay content or base saturation in a B horizon (.alfic), has a raesie temperature regime (mean annual temperature ranges from 8° to 15° C (47° - 59° F), and has no specific parem marital' mineralogy (mixed). . .. 7 Sandy-skeletal, 'mixed, rnesic Typic xer°rthent~ generally meaning the soil ha~ mimmal horizon development (ent), has no distinguishing charaCter/Sties at the Great Group level (art.h--standard), has developed reader climatic eonditior~ of wet winters and dry summers (x,r), has a mesie temperature regime. (mean annual temperature ranges from 8° to 15°C (47°- 59° F), has no ~e'ific mineralogic source (mixed), texture of the fine fi-action is md or loamy sand and coarse fi:agment content is gr .eater ttum 35% (sandy-skeletal)." ... 8 Euic, mesic Typic Medihemist, generally meanin8 that' the , soil 'is composed of organic fiber~ (is-t); the organics are approxJ half decomposed organic gels, and half fibrie plant mater/als (henri); th0re are few other unusual features, i.e. they are typical (medi and typic), they have developed under conditions ora mesie temperature regime (mean annual temperature ranges fi:om 8° to 15° C (47° - 59° F), and they have a pH above 4.5 (emc). _ 9 Dysic, mesic Typic Medihemist, generally meaning the soil is dominated by organic rather than mineral components, is greater than 20-30% organic matter (ist), has moderately- (as compared to slightly- or extremely-) decomposed organ.lc rnatc~rials (hem), is-otherwise not very unusual for an organic soil (medi and typic), has developed under conditions ora mesie climate (mean annual temperature ranges from 8° to 15° C (47° - 59° F), and has a pH lower than 4.5 (dysie). Page 4 water table, but the undisturbed soils off the trail were not hYdric -- i.e., they did not show evidence of a long'durati°n water table at. t2 inches or less. However, there was ample evidence of periodic flooding.- It Should be noted that while this area would not be.regulated as a wetland due to the water not standing long enough to develop anaerobic conditions, it still will be quite wet during the winter mOnths. -- ' · .- Because the.drainage is widespread across a broad section of the side slope with no clear drainage channel, it'is unlike!y.to be regulated as astream. But it will still require best management practices both during construction and for later traiimaintenance. Periodic culverts shouldbe placed to assure that drain/ng water does not back up against or run over the trail, creating erosion:gullieS and'muddY SectiOns that-may become impassable during per/ods of extended rainfall. The culvert locations should be decided upon during the rainy season by simply., walking the trail and marking those areas .where water is actively flowing.. Vegetation' . .... - -- Vegetation in the swale area is predominantly, a'somewhat.disturbed complex of Jefferson Count/es most common wetland plants With some Weedy species.and influence from pasture grasses. Vegetation across-the entire wetland complex, wkich is'more or less continuous from north of where the trail crosses all the way to Discovery Bay is quite diverse. 'A limited list is provided below: Tree species " Scientific Name(a'cronym) COmmon Name· Indicator Status Salix sitchensis.(SASI)* Sitka.willow FAC Alnus rubra (ALRU) · ' red aider FAC Salix scoulerana(SASC) .Scoulers Willow . FACW Malus fusca (MAFU) ' PacificCrabapple FACW Thuja plicata (THPL) western redcedar FACW · .. Shrub species ' " Scientific Name(acronym) Common Name .Indicator statUs Rosa pisocarpa(ROPI)* clustered roSe· FAC Spiraea douglasii (SPDO)'.,.. "" hardhack' FACW Rubus spectabilis (RUSP)* salmonberry FAC .: . Grassand other herbaceous species. Scientific'Name(acr0nym) ' : COmmon. Name Indicator Sta.tus Juncus effusus .(JUEF)* soft rush FACW+ Carex obnupta (CAOB)* 'slough. sedge OBL Circium edule (CIED)* edible thistle , FACW- Ranunculus repens (RARE)* creeping buttercup . FACW Unica dioica (URDI)* stinging, nettles' FAC+ Equisetum arvense (EQAR), ' r. field horsetail. 'FAC .. .. . ... Page 6 rate as a Category II system. It cannot, rate as a Category I system despite its extensive organic soils due to the extensive draining and disturbance. It is too large and diverse to rate as a Category III or IV. Class II wetlands are given a 100 feet wide standard buffers for high intensity development proposals,"and a 50 feet wide buffer for low intensity development proposals. Wetlands Regulatory Issues If there are any proposed impacts'to, wetlands or the Standard buffers as a result of this project, if there is a triggering permit for the proj.ect~i.-'- i.e., if there is any proposed activity that will require a permit from the County, the impacts must. be mitigated for to some degree with the primary jurisdictional agency being Jefferson County for buffer and ,wetland impacts, the Washington Dept. offish and Wildlife for stream' impacts, and the Army Corps of Engineers for wetland impacts. · Based on prehminary conversations with a Jefferson CoUnty representative, it does not appear. that any triggering permits will..be reqUired for this projectl However, it is recommended to follow best management practiCes in relation to impacts caused bythe trail crosSing.. That entails: minimizing the width and breadth of the croSsing; revegetating any areas that'are impacted by construction; and enhancing the buffer, in those areas where the trail is within 50 feet of.the wetland edge by Planting some native barrier vegetation. No guidance is provided in the ordinance about the required replacement ratios for wetland 'creation mitigation projects. But typically, any impacts to wetlands will.require at least a 2:1 or 3' 1. replacement of lost wetland acreage and restoration in areas temporarily impacted. Sometimes, wetland restoration or buffer enhancement is allowed as a partial credit to,ward the replacement ratio. .. Army CorPs of Engineers and State Dept. of Fish and Wildlife The Wetland' crossing is very small;'sO falls below the minimum acreage impacts that the COE wold regulate.' But theY.shoUld stil! be officia!ly notified of the proposed activity. BeCause the crossing is not in a fish bearing.stream} it'. does not appear.that the WDFW would be involved, but it is still advisable to .notify them and let th'em verify that itis not within their jurisdictional authority. . · . The COE regulates all-Waters'of the United States, including streams and wetlands. The WDFW regulates, all salmon'or fish'beating streams. Both agencies require notification and a detailed proposal describing the proposed-croSsing and potential impacts. They may also ask for a justification of the impact -- i.e.' prOof that there is no reasonable alternative to the proposed impact. Ho.wever, for such a Small project,' it is unlikely that either will require much more than basic notification. SUMMgS~Y This portion.of the trail crosses, only one. unbridged wetland area with the width at the crossing being between' 10 and 20 feet, There is a second crossing at an. existing bridge about 1~/4 mile from the north end of Section 29. · The unbridged crossing is at an existing trail, which suggests Page 8 textured layers, will have no effect on drainage other than to increase perching in the fine layer directly overlying the sand. Casey soils are used for pasture, wildlife habitat, recreation areas and rural homesites with the main limitation being seasonal wetness, with an expected water table at 12 t° 24 inches depth during the rainy season. The main limitations specifically for onsite septic and stormwater treatment are related to both the very fine soil textures and seasonal wetness. The slow permeability makes potential for septic drainfield failure very high, usually evidenced in a surface rather than' subsurface failure, during periods' of extended rainfall. CASSOLARY The Cassolary series is a deep, Well-drahaed soil fo"md on upland terraces in-reworked glacial and marine sediments. The Cassolary is a series of coarse and fine-textured.layers, The upper horizons' tend to be sandy loam.. Horizons from 27 to 40 inches is silt loam and silty clay. loam. BeloW that; soil texture becomes Sandy again; composed of stratified layers of fine sandy loam and sandy team down to 60 inches. · .- Soil permeability is moderately slow (0.2-0.6 inches p.er hour). ( These so/Is are used.pfimmly as pasture or woodland. 'They Can be used for homesites, 'but halve severe restrictions for septic design. The slow permeability increases chances of on ske drainfield failure. Furthermore, the textural layering typical of the' Cassolary can result in temporary perched.water tables above the finer textured soils. The sandy soils below the silt loam and silty clay loam layers have rapid permeability, i.e..poor filtering capacity. It is.suggested that community seWage systems be. used to avoid contamination of water supplies. Grass-lined swales or sand;t/ned.ponds may be encouraged for pretreatment of stormwater prior to infiltration in subsoils. CLALLAM SERIES .. The Clallam gravelly sandy loams are m6derately deep, well-drained soils formed in glacial fill. They are usually found on uplands, slopes· ranging from 0-30%. The surface soils are generally grayish-brown to dark grayish-brown gravelly Sandy.loams. They liave a weakly cemented glacial till layer, at 20-40 inches depth that will restrict vertical soil percolation to some degree... ., Average soil permeability is expected to be moderate (0.6-2 inches per hour) above the cemented till and very slow (less than' 0.06 inches per .hour) in the~till layer.'.A seasonal perched ·water table is not expected; the till in these areas must be more'fractured. However~ the s°il is'expected to be saturated periodically during the rainy.season and the majority Of soil water will percolate laterally. The Clallam soils odginally develOped under a forest, but more than half of the mapped acreage has been cleared and is now used for pasture, gardens,'0rchards 'and homesites: The pr/mary lim/tafions are related to shallow soft depths. Stormwater will percolate into the soft'readily in undisturbed areas, but will move laterally across the till layer, surfacing in adjacent'drainages .and !ow-lying. areas. Septic system design will be limited by minimal soft depths and fluctuating seasonal high water. ... · .. DICK SERIEs The Dick loamy sands are deep}, somewhat excessively drained soils formed in sandy glacial outwash on pla/ns and terraces. They are usually found On uplands, slopes ranging from 0-15%. In unweeded areas, the top 4 inches of the surface soils are generally grayisl~ brown loamy sands underlain by fighter brown loamy sands to 10 inches, then olive brown loamy sands to 60 inches.. Sometimes these soil have discontinuous yellowish brown weakly cemented lenses below 37 inches that restrict percolation to varying degrees. . . .. · Average-soil permeability is expected to beapid (6-20 inches per h°ur)2 No seasonal water table is expected'within 60 inches of the soft surface. .- . , The primary limitations of this:soil are related to fast percolation-rates. Septic systems may fail due to poor filtering ability. Page 11 support a foundation or mad'.- i.e.lthe struCtUre wil/sink' unless support pi/es are installed into competent, non-organ/c mater/als below the mu6k.' ' .- " . - · _ . . . . SEMIAHOO SERIES· ' .' . ..- -' . The Semiahoo mucks ale very deep~ very pOOrly-drained soils formed on flOOdplains out of organic materials derived · primarily from herbaceous °rgarfi.'c deposits. Drainage has often been altered by subsurface drains and open ditches. Native vegetation is' mainly sedges and rusheS. TyPically, the soils are black muck to a depth of 60 inches or more. The Semiahoo is.a hydric (Wetland) Soil .... · . . 'Percolation.rates are expected'to.be ·moderate (0.6-2'inches per hour).'." ' Serniahoo"soils are USed for cropland, haYland °r paSture. 'Most crops can °nly be grown if a drainage ,stem lowering · the water able 2-5 .feet. during the growing season is.installed.' Subsidence is minimal if the water table is maintained 'immediately below the root z,one, and .allowed.to return-to the surface during the winter season. These soils are not suited for'bUilding 0f any gort as' they have poor load-bearing capacities and so Will not effectively support a foundation .or road . lie. the structure Will sink'unless support piles are installed into:comPetent, non-organic mater/als below the muck .... . '_ "' ..'.'. . " . .- '. s m oo, s'' · ". · . : .-, . .' . , The SemiahOO muck iri0dera'tely.shali'o(~ variant is a'very poorly-drained soil formed on floodpla/ns out of organic materials derived primarily from herbaceous Organic depositS. Drainage has' often been altered by. subsurface drains and open ditches. Native vegetation'is mainly sedges:and rushes.. Typically, the soils have a black muck cap 10-15 roches thick, and mm°st places '2 to 4 layers, of mUck and mucky peat'o~erlymgmineral soil at 24 to 48.inches. In most of these.soils, there'is also a thin laYer (2,5 inches'thick) of diatomaceous earth'at 10-18 inches from the surface.' The Semiahoois a hydric (wetland) soil. '.i -'. '; - ' · , · ~ . . .' . .' Percolation rates are expected to be moderate (0.'i5-2 inches per hour). · .. .. .. .: , . .. .,. , ' . . Semiahoo softs, are used for'cr0plan~i hayland or pasturel Most crop~ Can only be grown'if adralnage system lowering the water'able 2-5'feet during the growing Season is inStalled.'.Subsidence is minimal if the water table is maintained immediately below the ~oot'.z0ne,'and allowed to remm to the surface during the Winter seasom .., These soils are not 'suited for building of anY' sort as.they have poor' load-bearing capacities and so will not effectively support a foundation or i:oad _, i.-e: the. structure will Sink unless, support piles are installed into competent, non-organic materials below themuck.' · '"'. ,.-- ".: ..- - ...: ' ~"-., ,i .... .. :. :. · '- .: .' . · .. . TtJKEYSERIES' "· ' '~' "" ..' ., · , '.. .. -. . . The Tukey gravelly loams, are mOderately deep}"moderately Well-drained soils formed on terraces in glacial'till. The surface'softs'are generally graYish, brown to br°wn gi:avelly loams. The subsoilS:are grayish_brown gravelly clay loams. They'have a'cememed, gra;,,etlYciay toamgtacial till' laYer at 2040 inches depth that will restrict vertical soil Percolation. ' ' ... "'i . . i '"" .._ · ': i', 'J. : ' ' '. Average, soft' perme~ il/, is 'eXPected''to.'b e' moderately slow ( 0 2,0.6 inches per hour) above .the cemented fill and 'very slow (less than 0206 inches per hoiir) in the fill. layer.. A.seaSonat perched Water table is expected; at 1.15-2.5. feet dur/ng · the rainy season. Soil water will percolate laterally across the surface of the till,, surfacing in low, lying' areas and drainages. ·- "..' ;" .-:' .-:"- . -- ~ ,'; ,-', , . . . . -,'- ,., . ').. · · . . .. . .TherukeYsoils'wareodginall~, ·. . . ... ...:.. ..... . . ... . ~.., ... W°°~ied, b~t'm°re..the majority of'mapPed'acreage has been cleared and is nowused-' for pasture, and homesites: There are inclusions'of sOfts with'enough cobbles and s~ones to hinder'cultivati0n. The primary limitations are related to.shallow soft depths-and sl0w percolation :rates. 'Stormwater will percolate into the 'soil slowly; increasing the chance of surf;ice nm,off and.eroSion.. OnCe m the soil.,. water Will 'moVe laterally across the till layer;.'surfacing in. adjacent drainages and low-lying areas. 'Septic ,stem design will be limited by'minimal soil . '",.- . ...:, . '.: .. .: . · Page 13 . . . .. . :. · , -, · .. . . : ' . · . ,' . . . · . .,. ... {Sari-- and Phase)= .. ~ / ~ / __ Orafnage Class; .... : Hts~= E~ipedon : High Org.nio Conten~ in 5u~iG$ ~yer In Sandy Sotl~ .. -- 8uifldIo Odor -- O~ga~o Streaking In Sandy Soils ~ A~= Moi$~r~ Raglme ~ U~ed on Loo~ Hydrio $o11~ U~ted on N~Oo~l Hydflo Soil, Ust - . Gley~ or ~w*Chr~a Colors -- Other (~pi~n in Remarks) .. ~ ~ iiii -. ~; .... . .......... I . ' D~ERMINA~ON W~ND .. Hy~;o $o~ Pre,~n~ No le ~ht, Samplln~ Point Within a We~and~ ~ ~ No " LARRY SCOTT MEMORIAL PARK VICINITY MAP EASTERN JEFFERSON COUNTY HASTING~ CAPE PORT TOWNSEND GEORGE BAY ! POI~ % DISCOVERY ' BAY * .... r,EGEND: ~ SEGMENT I · ''"'='" SEGHENT H SEGMENT III -,,=,,=,,=,,= SEGMEWr ~V SCALE IN MIT.F.S OCTOBER 6, 1999 ~ NOTE: I[l~[! 3 [~,, ~ ~ ~,x -- 1/2 0 1 2 :.::_.¥::. i:.~.Pro|ect Location. S P X Fort g eness PF~OTECTI ~6~,~ IS LAIRD" 0 mi 5 10 15 20 'ENC^~'TX 97 w o ~ L 0 A 1' L A q LARRY SCOTT MEMORIAL PARK TRAIL Location Map Compri, 'g:bt (C) 198g-1996. ~-msott Corpomdon and i~ sug~lic~. All riC'c,s deqross aerial mappinq 5/25/96 42§.828.4448 deqross c~eric~l mappinq 5/25/96 425.828.4448 deqross aerial mappinq 5/25/96 425.828.4448 deqross aerial mappinq 5/25/96 4;~5-8;~8-4448 deqross aerial mappinq si;'si96 42~5-8;~8-4448 deqross aerial mappinq 5/25/96 425.828.4448 .. ":- t Scott Memorial Trail - · ' ' Assessment Report .. · . Comity Soil Survey Map (page 2) · ' Soil Map Unit Soil Series -Al .. Huc. HvC Ho?pus gls, gsl, 0-15% 0-8% Mm McMurrav -Mukilteo peat complex Mu Mukilteo peat 0-83/o Sh Semiahoo muck, shallow variant il.0-. 15%, 15-30% Se Scmiahoo muck TuC Tttkey gl, 0- t5% .. :~'~ .. . . ,., .. t t ~.~o~:-ao r-t:~ ' [,am' Scou Memorial Trail Wetland Assessment Report JetTerson County Soil Survey Map (page 1) Soil Map Unit Soil Series Soil Map Unit Soil Series AgB Agnew sil, 0-8% Huc, HvC Hoypus gls. gsl. 0-15% Bk, Bm Belfast sil. sicl. 0-8% Mm McMurrnv -Mukilteo peat complex CeB Casev sil Mu Muklltco pent CfC Cassolarv sl, 0-8% Sh Scmiahoo muck, shallow variant CraG, CruD Clallam gsl. 0-15%. 15-30% Se Semiahoo t:nuck DcC Dick ls TuC Tukey gl. 0-15",/,, M95-0060 file reference number