Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout052 18 (c. I . 6 l' COUNTY OF JEFFERSON STATE OF WASHINGTON In the Matter of Adoption of the } 2019-2024 Six-Year Transportation } Improvement Program } RESOLUTION NO. 5 2_1 8 WHEREAS,State law obligates the legislative authority of each county to adopt on an annual basis a six-year transportation improvement program,holding a public hearing prior to adoption,the purpose of which is to"assure that each county shall perpetually have available advanced plans looking to the future for not less than six years as a guide in carrying out a coordinated transportation program"(RCW 36.81.121(1)); and, WHEREAS, an analysis of the Road Fund was prepared covering the six-year program period using the County's best estimate of future revenues and expenditures in accordance with WAC 136-15- 130; and, WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, Jefferson County, State of Washington, has reviewed the transportation project array and bridge condition report as prepared by the Department of Public Works,and has conducted a public hearing on the corresponding proposed six-year transportation improvement program; IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners does approve and adopt the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program for the years 2019 through 2024 inclusive. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that, with respect to the items listed in the Program, the County Engineer is authorized to make revision to individual project scope, length and termini,timing, and funding sources, as may be required from time to time due to additional resources becoming available or unavailable and in accordance with RCW 36.81.130 and WAC 136-16, without the Board of County Commissioners having to conduct a public hearing or adopt a resolution to amend the Program. ADOPTED and signed this 5'12 day of Ah)Ve1401- 2018. r JEFFERSON COUNTY �' ,� II. , BOARD OF C ISSIONERS w 1 ~ x"e k • . \ c ', ,; ' '/ . AY i' David Sullivan,C it �N \\, - • )r--- ik j\_________-- 1 v c 1 'e` Kate Dean,Member ATTEST: ai late' ,vt. 4<.(:64_ Carolyn allaway Y Kathleen Kier,Member Deputy Clerk o mn e o • E'ER 0OV 0 o e e o 0 EERR l7mX JO _ _ _ _ NON b _ _ _ _ _ _ 0' NN N n 42222 w uem 22 O N e e- X e- ( p o e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T Z 0 a a X ` �. y o m ui . y 0,0 N e o 0 e o o e o 0 c c 2 a°^„ m O J W n i 0 > o w Q = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U m a L,2 a o V' O 2e o o e o 0 W n e e EER W W n ri n ^ V. ^ y o e 0 0 e 0 0 a n " " m N a H -- N N W > RE kg_ o 0 0 O O O O 0-2 N m n 42 G,8, 'a 0 ^ n N 0 0 0 0 0 o m m e o e o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e ee e e e e e e e e o 0 0 0 0 0 J _ «om a ea- a oe oa _ e 2 NN ^ .. a 'T v 3i m �< N ria o mn E EE EE E a o RE e ^ - - 0 h R a n a 02 O N 'o a - - m m 0 - O C Se C 2 W 0 O O O 0 0 O O 0 Ix K W U' a i O 2 0w re re ° 0 0 0 0 a a? o E FE a e a f- g W y 3SVHd AB m n o - m :4"k w W 0o aZ 1500 MAUS N t,-,?_ oaa .' ev mm 0 LL 2 v. z O <Lu Wc‘i u 0 0 > O 0?r 3dA1 a a a a W W a a a a a N o Z m m m a a a a a o K U> ONfld 31tl1S a a a a 0 a a a a w cn f/fa � WLL as w H _ r o Deo f>: QZ N a p 3SVHd AB Q 0 g ISOO 1tl2303d •- LL F eJQ F- 0 3dA1 a. a a a a <4.t f f O LL (Mad 1112303A . a g 5 a LL LLWW LL M W z S1atl1S Mad e e ' e '' F- e ' e ' e F: . ,a'^N Ntl3A/H1NOW 1. H .0 w o a A w?L w n w 2 S w a 3 Wc • lw i W?� 711 W i m_ 3SvHd 103foad a a V r o:a U F y a V r i s 8,2 a s V, am,..;~ a a U~ a a V H a s V r ('Iwl a a H.ON3lltl101 a 0 - m v a 0 2 Sflltl1S ONfld 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 a a (S)3dA1r. 1N3W3AONdWI - "' e 0 0 o N ,2 2,62o a 1-,,, c E _ - lii Et E w c . w d a O1 tit n c Ez E >= g E - E an u E E tog dgr2E t N N --n w 4 a 'E'L `° 'o 0 n .. 80. - 2g m r A',1° ,1 ' '21' s,c0 g. E 2 m E a « Dm?, = F v vZo E - 6 m 2'E m $' o E41: -r E t.-.': c' o o o 3 y a E LL j s m a " 0W-o - a, E p Ec m°ua 0 v • G 1 « >ma - Sr` c 0 `g - .62 ,t253 sT22,2 o otLL9-- = F - a > > rte - -5 �W oY d E L°0"62 c E m a a o 1 u n y E 9-.S m Al-a:3 tl a m r 2�, a. :18, 02 .73 ,!LL CE ° c Ac .Xavc �a - c S= w E 7,,, g4 ag d - - a Fo m o c w >"v 2- n 2 a .. o Yi➢_o o a 'o w � u m m m o t ` Q moa 2 - ao a c o E Y a m a in 2 >_ N 2 y IyL T Y C N K 2 0°_ _N , O ry m i a N N 1 9 r ,9,,_. II o C o 0 0 a o 1 a s o o v; �� n 3 o a m o o� w�m a a a n Y x o a x a a� '� a, m r c- ?�j f o l vi E U c Y 'o^ a w S e y o m o t U v-f o' _ e o c_.'� W 9 C _ = m y w 0 E E W t' f'p v °«t m p a v 2 E y N 2 y r' e 1 v w U d N a m o a.° u 3 u e °� ,;n °1 0$ Q v n o.a^' _ n e a L i g n u o > � � � E n d gZ E O0°maOl y k56 m�=a `c a m m o S.oNc� mF.��= mq n 3 mnoai wq r a g m c c " a<mciow m�fn��0a vci mr°°n nFoOU `m��0� `J°�m0"' E���a`oFm00 E�r,m¢ �� a m 'ON 1031-021d dll - o ^ a 0 0 ^ m m of o Q Ua a mr.m.ONfld o i 0 i o o e e o - • o e en e n _ o e e o o mm e _ _ _ _ N _ _ _ _ +b b o r w2 mm V nO - - - - n -NN - nmPS 1n \o b e O 0 e e o o e e o . '. Lubb N NO • To' O O a❑ N 0 0 0 0 0 0ocCC 0 NO J Co H b b +o N Lu N d . W N = 0 W Q = 8 8 22 28 0 0 0 0 u a m 10 o e o e e WW. b b EE n 0 T m I- 111 n as ) r O z O e 0 0 0 0 W 0 N a w a o n n .- W er COn 1: _ 0 e•n m m u -e >.— e. oeIREEEEkkk O o e w b b We. n b b b b b m m J N O ilh e) _ _ _ O Oni n N -b O n O N T b e _ _ - - n m - - - " - b e. r -H r b b J O m eo e aa aao O o Rs N N u 2 ee n -- b ae 07 _^' C J LL C z m O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 gO IX o W 0 ¢ r j O rc Ow re O 0 a nz e H g W m 3SVHd A8 - n ne - a e - ' n+ EE W OQE 2 180331V1 ' " ' ' bn an z m LL W b W N r u m LL W m P P ` LL K N ?m Mid 31tl15 m z CO a N h a a a m m fC fC re K fC N Cn d W LL LL LL O. LL W LL 0 K re 0 N a ; 1800 1V8303d O p LL eQJ ce O 3.1m. n O LL CNN 1VN303d a. a. M U) . z SV3A/A/ Mildftd H1NOW N ,.-• n A A A n m ^ ^ F. ^ m ''' ' F. F 3StlHd 103fOad o! c o W '^. w$ m`o w a'.. W$ 'a o u2 W c o W$ 1 3 W$ w o ill LL w O r 'w8,- .w V r O.n'U r o.K 0 F 1 K 0 r i s 0 r d m U r ...fig LL m r 0.0 a ¢_ H.LON311tl101 z z e e o o SflltllS ONfld m a a o. a a a a a (S)3dA10 1N3W3AOddW1 `0 5- `0 w e _ E'2 26 ro >Em rcV E o vi o ,2E aa _ a o _ ,17,2 % - g!, s - m u y n o E` m N I a c E o a" e E E o m m o g. u , o 22 o a E o.N ',y o n A m w a s a a w r n N - E " 0 m K 8 g3 „ �g a�zz0 _ fit a- � oa eu (,-.)3 n y y D n¢ c o m e`wo rc d ,, »U E 2 a r c c 1°a= E m oc - y c a+ K-a' o E w E a y g 1°..= .70.11' n m m 3 a o' o=o g W i E c o it.! E d p t i m p , n y 10 Y 'w V p d - 'I' ll N O z a ani ,p a n- r`8 r w C a U c o 3 r• u , m` o m o :EV O m f 4 m c e-ii C c c c c C c U nE 8 «d c u ,IV-E, E c a fY a La o C 21 a a E o° n L c m _ o 2 '111%.1. 2 a c P U d o m E m a s f o o - W c v U 1ivwz3 o f wn- u a O()zaoz= 2OR Eta y m v w m 2222 m F gcc`o ° c 'c ^n o 'v3 w000._m�,� 5 Qo o E cm rFia 1O, m`o oon w me o o y H � o�:rc o`_- e imf w ma 0.0 0o. o °' =maa E urn Et°10 3$ ° o'�a m ao'�a o e - c r ' :noa "-f_ . 1- 88 -nf a m nE _ N2 n c 1- o d 0 0 9 II c n) d ¢ a1w Vo Ewb a' ine o 00w O a ",,, c w O E ORD d o aea U`t a `�° e Q a e `m m a �m fj U n �_ e Y 9 o ii i.o' w e V v n m Z 0 C m LL O r _ =_ o O n m N w O_ _.0 a`- ._f[ -m `° m u t 'o O W g o O U« • 0.¢f0 V O W O 2 r a r R r 3 O fY r e u P S r m S a 5 r m 0 as u r m m a w r n m m w r b m 3 n r c C CD M 'ON 133r0Hd dllcs e m <0 a a a J SSVIO'ONfld o e o o z i z o 0 J o O O O C e O O O O : F G q : °,2>8`< X X e o o _ _ o e e o m � m m o X r`" -'„wNia g - na n -m w oona d nn a N N N X o N r O� O o o II I o e X 0 W N N O n H h n O • > > N N N O h cm f] yn EE E o o O I II 'E Rili E =re W a H dt n n TiJ 2 m dg !V J a 0 - = p W N N N Q = e U EE I E II 'E EEEE m a n_ n_ W - n N n - a e ._ _ V a n W N N N N _ a O 2 O W nE. o a e X aE Ekkk m n H N W a N h h m m N n N grl j e n ri e ' I IEEE EIE a o a E ary r Hie gg yi e e W N r n m iri z^$ n g ' wNn N IEEE J o a m 'o n g - - N o O ana - - '+a N Nna N... - qt a o - - - N- - - - n - - N - IE E'EI i ERRE O U 2 J _ - c J LL C2 m O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 gw W w2 O 2 p' re O f[ O e LL M rTa Sp .- g W m 3SVHd AS - - - ori Z p C Z 1S03 311/16 _ ' N r N r°a na C W p O J J - 2 LL > 0.0.a. K a K} G mo, 3AIreY K Ir O K N v z m ONfld 31V1S111 m to m 0 0 w N N d OwLL ft et i- E ) 0 N a p 3SVHd AB - N Ce j 1S031v21333d Q p LL Q J W 0 3dA1 10 u ONfld 1VN303j m N Z g S.HV1S ONfl ^a m g m tlV]A/H1NOW H 3SVdlnmm arc V s V F a a U o a a U F a a U,2 awe, eoa mr 474 (to) a_ a_ ON HI311V101 • z 2 2 z Sf iVIS ONfld a a a a a (S13d u IN3W3AONdtI o N `" m c - g g ,' o N _ M Z m" = a fo3 g '0,1 ry 91 c '1 . " E r¢ e` E $ "ua� 73 oE "( ac= aa coop L E @V >2o iFo ma E-> ` iE oi � 0 :N om aOoo c, 0 Omd pymmgaW gig! o oa 4 -c 0 Z 9 3_ O r E g c 2, 0'2 e r a .U FEvo - Eo H > _ ' go o wmo Eofnm8 Uco>99fo _ Q g . m O Joo a g No o - 9 d ' N a OO K Sd vti ;g i -0oa aFFSo N g H U ° „iwfrwaE ° ▪“ .w ii p E aa'Qwoan ' . EEuoDtuCo5dW " Z OCmaG - EA c munmom `° `a- w % U« amUoumOOmF Uli Fn U> doaatFw 0 . 'ON 133f0Nd dll 12 N N N ” N O]O �p <0 a g a a SSV1O'ONfl1 z 2 o z 2 C a am ount \ .ark :Pi "c 1 - pfferson County a — ,`41 a P est, a a 3 o --f ' . . L,,,, 6?) \ ardine Beach R, Ti 3 (+oma art. "--11 o°� o aoodla- i`- 0�, n Qom13 ° �r s Jefferson County P�.art- m� p�p5r� ATt®® N o SeS rOW Transportation , . Four r St o f r �j? `# Fey Y � Y p DiscoveryBayQr"erSR _ !_� Q' N Improvement Program ah Q 6P a p 2019-2024 `s til _"!,; d 16 Scale is Miles __ � oil WI. 1 ' eod d 0 7. 2 3431 1C1.4r I,. Jr 9go ,a MO iiillii l' Fi w ,, o R v _ da D Funding Secured �T 'z.3 ..ins R. Planned (unfunded) - andet5°r (� / ( 14 Box numbers correspond r a to project numbers in .d-O0d Oak Bay narrative summary. Y o u+, r R. Vd • 'Fp' w w ',, _.-' 19 :t 1,-,0en<a 3 .rd< W coww vas s.., i. • 1. 4a . wP eRa Lind R ",'o I trgcr ..illiA - WM i �� \Rd _ if) ( �e m Egg&16.. SWC \ 01 ili `✓ `4zzcnh RI'' y \ a> ,..1 Soot orF L Sinr-t' j% C/''v,eer CI C . '..,. Wla C1_W ty Nattigoi_ is - Park Olymi oh, c ..- -- ,, - son Cote t- ;`4,t�i R�= = —'•\V -- �- r U lk ridr,. r PP ejah0' ill r iro a a , .S\ �G m e . 1" �` 4 `yr a oo1 der re.. h n pAa ' :ANADA v "sWa� ��., /---1-1::':141 I nd I • Isla Tai„. _ I \ x c o= .o 'J • g Clallam 0.• -11:21 - �' ,01". 0- Jefferson a I 2 H o n -- L_ r ,i ro �`c z �• 7Grays Harbor' Mason fY �o. ne _ o 9 IO ♦ enes3 Rd c''''''' c o• d 4 MI o i pP i °o'Rd l .or 3 , \ o5aa a illtQu � v g 11 �o C 2 �,,,.. Dabob Bay a a �r 2019-2024 SIX-YEAR TIP BY PROJECT CATEGORY Prior. # Project Description Permanent Repairs and Mitigation for Emergency Projects Local Other State Federal Total Category Subtotal $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Road&Intersection Improvements Local Other State Federal Total 1 UPPER HOH ROAD/OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK FLAP PROJECT $20,000 _ $ - $ - $20,000 3 SOUTH DISCOVERY ROAD PAVEMENT PRESERVATION $45,580 _ $410,220 $ - $455,800 5 UNDI RD BYPASS FLAP PROJECT $15,000 $15,000 6 QUILCENE CENTER ROAD REBUILD-2R(RESURFACE&RESTORE) $65,740 $ 591,660 $ - $657,400 7 UPPER HOH ROAD/OLYMPIC NATIONAL PARK CHIP SEAL $ - _ $ 408,400 $0._ $408,400 8 OLD HADLOCK ROAD REALIGNMENT&TRAIL $110,000 $0 $110,000 17 SOUTH DISCOVERY ROAD REALIGNMENT _ $215,000 $1,935,000 $ - $2,150,000 18 S.DISCOVERY ROAD 3 R PROJECT $ 85,700 $ 768,300 $0 $854,000 Category Subtotal $557,020 $0 $4,113,580 $0 $4,670,600 Culvert&Bridge Replacement Local Other State Federal Total 9 SNOW CREEK ROAD CULVERT REPLACEMENT-MP 0.84 $ 15,000 _$ 1,775,000 $1,790,000 11 THORNDYKE ROAD CULVERT REPLACEMENT-THORNDYKE CREEK $10,000 $1,798,313 $1,808,313 12 WEST VALLEY ROAD CULVERT REPLACEMENT-NAYLOR CREEK $ 10,000_ $1,088,850 $ - $1,098,850 21 OIL CITY RD CULVERT REPAIR-MP 0.50 $ 105,050 $ 379,950 50 $485,000 Category Subtotal $140,050 $0 $3,267,113 $1,775,000 $5,182,163 Non-Motorized Transportation Local Other State Federal Total 2 QUILCENE COMPLETE STREETS PHASE 1 $0 $ 701,578 $ - $701,578 4 ODT-DISCOVERY BAY TO LARRY SCOTT TRAIL CONNECTION $0 $401,500 $ - $401,500 13 CEDAR AVENUE&NESS CORNER RD(SR 116)PED-BIKE IMPROVEMENTS $ -_ $858,490 $ - $858,490 14 H1 CARROLL THROUGH CHIMACUM CROSSROADS PED-BIKE IMPROVEMENTS _$ 5,000 $193,000 $ - $198,000 15 QUILCENE COMPLETE STREETS PHASE 2 $ - $1,296,600 $1,296,600 16 RICK TOLLEFSON TRAIL-PHASE 2(CONNECTIONS) $0 $775,000 $ - $775,000 19 ODT SOUTH DISCOVERY BAY-SEGMENT B _$ 100,000 $1,386,000 $ - $1,486,000 23 ODT 4 CORNERS TO ANDERSON LAKE STATE PARK $ - $2,500,000 $2,500,000 Category Subtotal $105,000 $0 $8,112,168 $0 $8,217,168 Engineering Assessments&Countywide Programs Local Other State Federal Total 10 OIL CITY ROAD ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT $30,000 $ - $ - $30,000 20 COUNTYWIDE BRIDGE LOAD RERATING PER FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS $17,375 $ - $ 111,325 $128,700 22 VARIOUS COUNTYWIDE IMPROVEMENTS $180,000 $ - $ - $180,000 Category Subtotal $227,375 $0 $0 $111,325 $338,700 Local Other State Federal Total $1,029,445 $0 $15,492,861 $1,886,325 $18,408,631 Jefferson County Department of Public Works 623 Sheridan St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 r` (360) 385-9160 Monte Reinders, P.E. Public Works Director/County Engineer MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Monte Reinders, P.E., Public Works Director/County Engineer/Le,. DATE: September 11, 2018 SUBJECT: Bridge Condition Report 2018 INTRODUCTION As required by WAC 136-20-060, each county engineer shall furnish the county legislative authority with a written report of the findings of the bridge inspection effort. This report shall be made available to said authority and shall be consulted during the preparation of the proposed six- year transportation program revision. The report shall include the county engineer's recommendations as to replacement, repair or load restriction for each deficient bridge. The resolution of adoption of the six-year transportation program shall include assurances to the effect that the county engineer's report with respect to deficient bridges was available to said authority during the preparation of the program. BRIDGE INVENTORY Jefferson County Public Works has 34 active bridges—see the attached Master Bridge List (Appendix A) for a listing of the county bridges. Of these, 32 bridges meet the federal definition of a bridge and are subject to the National Bridge Inspections Standards. Two of the bridges do not meet the federal bridge definition, one because it is a pedestrian bridge,and one because it has less than a twenty foot span;nevertheless, these two bridges are on Jefferson County's biannual bridge inspection program. Jefferson County also has two permanently closed bridges, which are not listed on the Master Bridge List. Bridge Condition Report 2018 Page 1 of 4 BRIDGE INSPECTIONS The National Bridge Inspection Standards(NBIS)and WAC 136-20-030 mandate that public agencies inspect and report on all bridges at least once every two years(routine inspection). Jefferson County staff performs all routine inspections. Special inspections are required for bridges that cannot be inspected adequately from the ground. For these bridges an Under-Bridge Inspection Truck(UBIT) is required. Steel bridges with fracture critical members may also require special inspections with the UBIT and/or other special equipment. Jefferson County has two bridges which require the UBIT inspection and one bridge which requires both the UBIT and the fracture critical inspection(identified in the attached Master Bridge List). Jefferson County currently has a contract with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT)to perform these inspections. Jefferson County Public Works has split up the bridge inspections so that East Jefferson County bridges are inspected in odd-numbered years and West Jefferson County bridges are inspected in even-numbered years. In conformance with that schedule, Jefferson County has completed the biennial inspections for all West Jefferson County bridges in 2018. WSDOT, under contract with Jefferson County, performed the required UBIT and Fracture Critical inspection of the Cassel Creek Bridge. The completed inspection reports were submitted to WSDOT, which verifies compliance with the NBIS and reports to the Federal Highway Administration(FHWA). DEFICIENT BRIDGES All bridges are assigned a sufficiency rating(SR),which is a calculated score based on numbers assigned to all of the bridge elements reviewed by the bridge inspector. The SR is a number from 0 to 100, with 100 being an entirely sufficient bridge, and 0 being an entirely insufficient or deficient bridge. For additional explanation of the sufficiency rating and other ratings see the attached WSDOT publication,Bridges and Structures—Ratings(Appendix B). The sufficiency rating is used to determine if a bridge is eligible for federal rehabilitation or replacement funding. Under the current funding requirements,to be eligible for replacement a bridge must be structurally deficient and have a sufficiency rating of less than 40;to be eligible for rehabilitation a bridge must be structurally deficient and have a sufficiency rating of less than 80. Currently, none of the county's bridges meet these criteria, and therefore none are eligible for rehabilitation h' g or replacement. As described in previous Bridge Condition reports,the Tower Creek Bridge is being monitored for potential scour problems associated with down-cutting of the streambed. The Tower Creek streambed experienced significant down-cutting in 2007-2008 due to migration of the Hoh River and heavy flows in Tower Creek. However, based on regular monitoring,the streambed elevation has been relatively stable since 2008. Public Works will continue to monitor this situation. The Tower Creek Bridge is scheduled to be replaced in 2019-2020 by the Federal Highway Administration Western Federal Lands Division, and is being funded entirely by a Federal Lands Access Program grant. Bridge Condition Report 2018 Page 2 of 4 P POSTED BRIDGES All bridges are required to have a"Load Rating" calculation. The Load Rating establishes how much weight the bridge can carry for several standard configurations of vehicle axle loads. If the load rating calculation shows that a bridge cannot safely carry the legal traffic loads, as indicated by having an operating rating of less than one, then the bridge must be posted with the appropriate load limits. The operating rating values are listed on the attached Master Bridge List (Appendix A). Jefferson County currently does not have any bridges with load restrictions. The Yarr Bridge, which has an operating rating of 0.66, is being inspected on an annual basis, and shows no signs of distress. This plan of increased inspection frequency, which was recommended by the WSDOT Local Programs Bridge Engineer, is an acceptable alternative to load posting, provided that the bridge continues to show no signs of distress. A 2013 FHWA mandate requires that all bridges be load rated for a relatively new class of vehicle, the Specialized Hauling Vehicle (SHV). SHV's are closely-spaced multi-axle single unit trucks introduced by the trucking industry in the last decade. Examples include dump trucks, construction vehicles, solid waste trucks and other hauling trucks. The FHWA has divided bridges into two categories,with the first category requiring updated load ratings by December 31, 2017, and the second category requiring updated load ratings by December 31, 2022. Jefferson County has completed the new load ratings for three bridges for the 2017 deadline. An additional twenty-two bridges will need to be re-load rated prior to the 2022 deadline. It is possible that some Jefferson County bridges will need to be load posted for SHV's after the load rating results are known. OBSOLETE BRIDGES The Old Little Quilcene Bridge and the Maple Creek Bridge have been placed in obsolete status and removed from the Master Bridge List. Both are permanently closed to vehicular traffic. This action removes the requirement for biennial bridge inspection. EMERGENCY REPAIRS AND INSPECTIONS No emergency repairs or inspections were performed in 2018 at the time of this report. MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES Routine maintenance of the county's bridges is conducted by the road maintenance department. Typical routine maintenance consists of deck cleaning, brush clearing, and minor miscellaneous repairs. COMPLETED PROJECTS No bridge projects were completed in 2018 at the time of this report. Bridge Condition Report 2018 Page 3 of 4 CURRENT PROJECTS Current projects include the following: • An 80 foot span concrete bridge at West Uncas Rd MP 0.804 is currently under construction. Construction is scheduled to be completed in December 2018. This project is being funded by a Salmon Recovery Funding Board grant(approx. 85%), a National Fish Passage Program grant(approx. 10%),and local funds(approx. 5%). PROGRAMMED PROJECTS The Tower Creek Bridge on Upper Hoh Road is scheduled to be replaced during the 2019 2020 construction season. This project is being managed by the Federal Highway Administration Western Federal Lands Division, and is funded entirely by a Federal Lands Access Program grant. Jefferson County is currently applying for grant funding to design replacements for fish- barrier culverts at Thorndyke Road milepost 4.71 (Thorndyke Creek), West Valley Road milepost 2.59 (Naylor Creek), and Gibbs Lake Road milepost 1.82 (Naylor Creek). If funded, each of these culverts would most likely be replaced with new bridges. RECOMMENDED PROJECTS There are no recommended bridge projects at this time. Bridge Condition Report 2018 Page 4 of 4 APPENDIX A Jefferson County Public Works Master Bridge List LAST UPDATED: 6/14/18 Total number of bridges in inventory: 34 Total number of permanently closed bridges: 2 Total number of active bridges: 34 Total number of West Jefferson County bridges: 19 active bridges 1 short-span(non NBIS)bridge 1 permanently closed bridge Total number of East Jefferson County Bridges 13 active bridges 1 pedestrian(non NBIS)bridge 1 permanently closed bridge Jefferson County Public Works Master Bridge List East Jefferson County Last Updated:9/13/2018 a I- F ❑ C F k Zso M F re U re p O 0 p G90� F.G as BRIDGE TYPE a -g. b S b 0 z9. F.b?° aOz Opo a p F V < F F p i O F t U<<�aa a o z $2 Li m S m m © z d r.b uu7 2 P. a < o o ti a a i y % B o 0 C 'a 1 22 0 v a a a a r a a o p Superstructure Substructure 7996700 15E Hunts 634509 Hunt Rd. 0.15 27 Reinforced Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 1971 NO NO NO NO NO 1.18 1.97 STD. 4/25/17 88.92 Slab C.I.P.cont,piles (42 TON) (70 TON) 8165100 16E Little 931507 Center Rd. 14.6 64 Reinforced Conc. Conc.Pile cap, 1955 NO NO NO NO NO 0.63 1.05 STD. 4/25/17'59.75 FO Quilcene Slab,Conc.Girder Prestress.Cone. (22 TON) (37 TON) River Piles 8464900 I7E Yarr 931507 Center Rd. 3.44 25 Conc.Multiple Web Conc.Abutment w/ 1955 NO NO NO NO NO 0.39 0.66 STD. 425/17 64.61 12 MONTH INSPECTION Girder Prestress.Conc. (14 TON) (23 TON) FREQUENCY piles 8320300 23E Linger 301309 Linger 0.42 81 Prestress.Cone. Conc.Abutment w/ 1969 NO NO NO NO NO 0.89 1.49 STD. 4/19/17 70.03 Longer Longer Rd. Bulb-T Girder Conc.column over (32 TON) (53 TON) C.I.P.cont.piles 8381400 24E Rocky 250008 Dosewallips 3.01 47 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 1964 NO NO NO NO NO 0.72 120 STD. 4/19/17 76.99 Brook Rd. Bulb-T Girder Conc.Spread (25 TON) (43 TON) _footing 8229900 25E Meyers 503409 Belfiage 0.12 30 Timber Timber abutment, 1977 NO NO NO NO NO 0.81 1.12 STD. 629/17 63.58 Rd. timber piles (29 TON) (40 TON) 8488200 26E West Uncas 500209 West Uncas 1.89 61 Reinf Conc.Slab Conc.Abutment, 1964 NO NO NO NO NO 0.66 1.10 STD. 4/19/17 82.17 Rd. Conc.column over (23 TON) (39 TON) C.I.P.cont.pile 8136900 28E Leland 344009 Rice Lake 0.33 32 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment, 1987 NO NO NO NO NO 1.59 2.66 Sm. 4/19/17 88.20 Creek Rd. Slab Conc.spread (57 TON) (95 TON) FO footing 8660000 29E Contractors 501409 Old 3.56 294 Timber Deck, Conc.Pile cap,steel 2000 NO NO NO NO NO 0.78 1.31 UBIT 7/13/16 86.41 UBIT EVERY 4 YEARS-- Creek Gardiner Timber Girders piles (28 TON) (47 TON) LAST UBIT 7/132016 Rd. Page 1 of 2 Jefferson County Public Works Master Bridge List East Jefferson County m oa g� 5 o m.z, v u uok" F p BRIDGE TYPE s"t a y in m fr g ra o ag a s o m ,pppq, y �wi c� < — >'.4.-4 - z 7 T'. y yL` G� Obi < PO V z m 2 < F L d1 F , F S P6 B x Z < ,A . E1 2 U CC W ° m s/°t T a i ` v o o a 1 si, 5 B Superstructure Substructure 8754000 3lE Shine Creek 447608 South Point 0.25 70 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 2005 NO NO NO NO NO 1.45 1.76 STD. 425/17 97.58 Rd. Slab Cone.Pile (64 TON) (108 TON) 8753900 32E Donovan 327508 E Quilcene 0.77 70 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 2006 NO NO NO NO NO 1.25 1.62 STD. 4/19/17 89.28 Creek Rd. Slab Conc.Pile (60 TON) (101 TON) 8753800 33E Old Tarboo 357509 Old Tarboo 0.88 42 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 2005 NO NO NO NO NO 1.84 3.07 SW. 4/25/17 89.98 Rd. Slab steel piles (66 TON) (l1I TON) 8753800 38E Andrews 352909 Snow Creek 3.78 24 Conc.3-sided Box Conc.Spread 2014 NO NO NO NO NO 1.23 1.60 (57 STD. 4/19/17 91.14 Creek Rd. Culvert Footing (44 TON) TON) 8898600 41E RTMT 352909 Rick 0.17 80 Steel Thm Truss Conc.Spread 2017 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A STD. 426/18 N/A Pedestrian Tollefson Footing Mem.Trail Page 2 of 2 Jefferson County Public Works Master Bridge List West Jefferson County Last Updated:9/13/2018 Li 13p 9 Z m _ v z C 2:4., G cs g G p BRIDGE TYPE a U 6�' f� < Ci.' �0. e;f00000 S f m g - c E o f i G�o g Superstructure Substructure 8451600 01W Fletcher 911607 Quinault S. 3.19 78 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 1974 NO NO NO NO NO 0.98 1.64 STD. 522/18 99.50 Creek Shore Rd. Bulb-T Girder C.I.P.cont.pile (35 TON)(58 TON) 8258500 02W Barlow 134309 Oil City Rd. 9.75 64 Prestress.Conc.Slab Cone Abutment w/ 2005 NO NO NO NO NO 1.53 1.99 STD. 5/22/15 83.53 C.I.P.Cone Pile (69 TON)(115 TON) 8145800 03W Anderson 134309 Oil City Rd. 4.44 87 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 1974 NO NO NO NO NO 0.91 1.52 STD. 5/22/18 90.43 Creek Bulb-T Girder C.I.P.cont.pile (32 TON)(54 TON) 8280100 04W Hell Roaring 914207 Upper Hoh 0.16 120 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 1982 NO NO NO NO NO 1.31 2.19 STD. 5/23/18 91.88 Creek Rd. Girder steel H pile (47 TON)(78 TON) 8298800 05W Alder Creek 914207 Upper Hob 2.07 67 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 1972 NO NO NO NO NO 1.11 1.85 STD. 5/23/18 99.59 Rd. Bulb-T Girder C.I.P.cont.pile (40 TON)(66 TON) 8383600 06W Rock Creek 914207 Upper Hoh 6.49 83 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 1973 NO NO NO NO NO 1.13 1.89 STD. 5/23/18 92.80 Rd. Bulb-T Girder C.I.P.cone,pile (40 TON)(67 TON) 8384000 07W Tower Creek 914207 Upper Hob 7.5 71 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 1973 NO NO NO NO NO 1.10 1.84 STD. 5/23/18 92.80 Rd. Bulb-T Girder C.I.P.cont.pile (39 TON)(66 TON) 8391000 08W Queets River 107509 Clearwater 0.6 844 Steel Plate Girder, Conc.Piers,Conc. 1988 NO NO NO NO NO 1.07 1.79 UBIT 7/11/16 98.71 UBIT EVERY 4 YEARS-- Rd. C.I.P.cone deck Abutment w/steel H (38 TON) (64 TON) LAST UBIT 7/112016 pile 8047800 09W Hemphill 146809 Dowans 2.3 31 Timber Deck, Timber abutment, 1977 NO NO NO NO NO 0.75 1.06 STD. 522/18 60.39 Creek Creek Rd. Timber Girders timber piles (27 TON) (38 TON) 7966600 10W Omens 146809 Dowans 0.52 81 Prestress.Cone Conc.Abutment w/ 1974 NO NO NO NO NO 1.10 1.84 STD. 522/18 93.79 Creek Creek Rd. Bulb-T Girder C.I.P.cont.pile (39 TON) (66 TON) Pagel oft Jefferson County Public Works Master Bridge List West Jefferson County Last Updated:9/13/2018 as m I I ..r Y z 6 mm g G.- y 3 OEi = Li BRIDGE TYPE b88 S -1 L eF <FPe I d Z }�O O rn i E m fl 0 E g 9 g g i F g o S m , i 1. d z ��c a Superstructure Substructure 8475700 l IW Owl Creek 135109 Maple 1.29 69 Prestress.Conc.Slab Conc.Abutment w/ 1989 NO NO NO NO NO 1.36 2.27 STD. 5/22/18 83.45 Creek Rd. steel H piles (49 TON)(81 TON) FO 8253600 13W Hurst Creek 107509 Clearwater 2.66 67 Prestress.Conc. Cone.Abutment, 1969 NO NO NO NO NO 1.03 1.72 STD. 5/22/18 98.86 Rd. Bulb-T Girder Conc.column,Conc. (37 TON)(61 TON) footing 8339400 27W Willoughby 914207 Upper Hoh 3.52 60 Prestress.Conc. Cone.Pile cap w/ 1962 NO NO NO NO NO 0.82 1.37 STD. 5/23/18 59.03 Creek Rd. Bulb-T Girder Prestress.Conc. (29 TON)(49 TON) piles 8659900 30W Cassel Creek 134309 Oil City Rd. 3.59 154 Steel Girder Conc.Pile cap,steel 2000 YES NO NO NO NO 1.19 2.00 UBIT 7/11/16 72.52 Fracture Crines Special Inspection- piles (43 TON)(72 TON) FO WSDOT performs inspection with UBIT In-annually 8829800 34W Pole Creek 914207 Upper Hoh 0.3 37 Conc.3-sided Box Conc.Spread 2010 NO NO NO NO NO 1.11 1.44 STD. 5/23/18 92.80 Rd. Culvert Footing (50 TON)(65 TON) 8845600 35W Dismal Creek 914207 Upper Hoh 9.19 22 Cone.3-sided Box Cone.Spread 2011 NO NO NO NO NO I 1.3 STD. 5/23/18 91.00 Rd. Culvert Footing (36 TON)(46 TON) 8853500 36W Spruce Creek 914207 Upper Hoh 9.7 22 Conc.3-sided Box Conc.Spread 2012 NO NO NO NO NO 1.176 1.465 STD. 5/23/18 92.80 Rd. Culvert Footing (42 TON)(52 TON) 8863300 37W Alder Creek 914207 Upper Hoh 2.15 25 Cone.3-sided Box Conc.Spread 2013 NO NO NO NO NO 1.00 1.29 STD. 5/23/18 91.11 Tributary Rd. Culvert Footing (36 TON)(46 TON) 8886600 39W Upper Hoh 914207 Upper Hoh 6.95 21 Conc.3-sided Box Conc.Spread 2016 NO NO NO NO NO 1.65 2.13 STD. 5/23/18 82.69 Rd.MP 6.95 Rd. Culvert Footing (59 TON)(76 TON) XG03070 41E Donkey 107509 Clearwater 1.29 17 Conc.3-sided Box Open-ended steel 2015 NO NO NO NO NO 1.04 1.34 STD. 5/22/18 0 Creek Rd. Culvert pipe piling (37 TON)(48 TON) Page 2 of 2 APPENDIX B WSDOT - Bridges and Structure- Ratings Page 1 of 2 Washington Stat. •/ Department of Transportation Bridge Ratings The safety of bridge structures in Washington State is ensured through a meticulous inspection system. All public bridge owners, such as WSDOT, Counties and Cities, follow the same bridge inspection procedures. The condition rating of all bridgeK! �` it" it decks, superstructures and substructures and other elements �'f. y based on these inspections. [ i . Ipl4t, • USDOT s Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requires all f: ,�r � public bridge owners (state, city, it.and county ) to inspect and their bridges and report information including bridge condition ratings as part of their requirements in the National Bridge Inventory Standards (NBIS). Important aspects of the NBIS were: 1. All states , SR20 Deception Pass Bridge must perform '!I t periodic inspections of bridges greater than 20 feet in span on at least a biennial SR6 Wiliapa River bridge basis. 2. Data collection was standardized and must be reported to FHWA. 3. Qualifications for inspection personnel were defined. 4. Training programs were developed and implemented. 5. The Bridge Replacement Program (BRP) was established to provide funding for bridge replacement on the system. Structurally Deficient Structurally deficient means that a bridge requires repair or replacement of a certain component. This may include cracked or spalled concrete, the bridge deck, the support structure, or the entire bridge itself. If the condition is such that it no longer is able to carry its intended traffic loads it may be weight restricted. Being structurally deficient does not imply that the bridge is in danger of collapse or unsafe to the traveling public. If a bridge is open then it is considered safe. A bridge is classified as"Structurally Deficient"when bridge inspectors give either the superstructure, deck, and/or substructure a rating of four or less on a scale of zero to nine. WSDOT's poor condition category uses the same data, criteria, and rating scale. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Bridge/Reporting/BridgeRatings.htm 8/14/2015 WSDOT- Bridges and Structures - Ratings Page 2 of WSDOT has 137 state owned bridges that are classified as structurally deficient _i 6r ' 'v as of Jan. 2015.A list of these bridges is available in pdf and web page and t ,. map format. Functionally Obsolete Functional obsoiescence is assessed by comparing the existing - design of each bridge to current standards. A bridge can be categorized functionally obsolete a number of ways including: 0,, substandard bridge widths, low vertical clearance that can lead to repeated damage from over height trucks, load-carrying capacity,or flood potential. Interstate 82 Columbia River bridge near Umatilla There are 866 WSDOT bridges that are rated"Functionally Obsolete" Good, Fair, Poor Condition Rating Good: A range from no problems to some minor deterioration of structural elements. Fair: All primary structural elements are sound but may have deficiencies such as minor section loss, deterioration, cracking, spalling, or scour. Poor: Advanced deficiencies such as section loss, deterioration, cracking, spalling, scour, or seriously affected primary structural components. Bridges rated in poor condition may be posted with truck weight restrictions. A summary of the WSDOT bridge network conditions is available in the 2014 Bridge Annual Report in the Gray notebook. Copyright WSDOT CO 2015 http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Bridge/Reporting/BridgeRatings.htm 8/14/2015 Bridge atispection Definitions What are "general condition ratings?" According to the National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS), condition ratings are used to describe an existing bridge or culvert compared with its condition if it were new. The ratings are based on the materials, physical condition of the deck (riding surface), the superstructure (supports immediately beneath the driving surface) and the substructures (foundation and supporting posts and piers). General condition ratings range from 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent). For detailed definitions, click here. Which bridges are included in the NBI system? NBI structures are bridges or culverts that carry vehicular traffic and have an opening longer than 20 feet measured along the center of the roadway. What bridges are not considered part of the NBI system? Non-NBI structures include bridges or culverts that carry vehicular traffic and are equal to or less than 20 feet measured along the center of the roadway. VDOT exceeds the NBI standards by inspecting and documenting in our inventory all bridges regardless of their length and all culverts having an opening greater than 36 square feet. What is a "structurally deficient" bridge? Bridges are considered structurally deficient if they have been restricted to light vehicles, closed to traffic or require rehabilitation. Structurally deficient means there are elements of the bridge that need to be monitored and/or repaired. The fact that a bridge is "structurally deficient" does not imply that it is likely to collapse or that it is unsafe. It means the bridge must be monitored, inspected and maintained. How is "structural deficiency" determined? The condition of different parts of a bridge is rated on a scale of 0 to 9 (with 9 being "excellent" and zero being "failed"). A structurally deficient bridge is one for which the deck (riding surface), the superstructure (supports immediately beneath the driving surface) or the substructure (foundation and supporting posts and piers) are rated in condition 4 or less. What makes a bridge structurally deficient, and are structural deficient bridges unsafe? The fact that a bridge is "structurally deficient" does not imply that it is likely to collapse or that it is unsafe. A "deficient" bridge is one with some maintenance concerns that do not pose a safety risk. A "deficient" bridge typically requires maintenance and repair and eventual rehabilitation or replacement to address deficiencies. To remain open to traffic, structurally deficient bridges are often posted with reduced weight limits that restrict the gross weight of vehicles using the bridges. If unsafe conditions are identified during a physical inspection, the structure must be closed. What is a "functionally obsolete" bridge? A functionally obsolete bridge is one that was built to standards that are not used today. These bridges are not automatically rated as structurally deficient, nor are they inherently unsafe. Functionally obsolete bridges are those that do not have adequate lane widths, shoulder widths, or vertical clearances to serve current traffic demand, or those that may be occasionally flooded. A functionally obsolete bridge is similar to an older house. A house built in 1950 might be perfectly acceptable to live in, but it does not meet all of today's building codes. Yet, when it comes time to consider upgrading that house or making improvements, the owner must look at ways to bring the structure up to current standards. What is a "fracture-critical" bridge? A fracture-critical bridge is one that does not contain redundant supporting elements. This means that if those key supports fail, the bridge would be in danger of collapse. This does not mean the bridge is inherently unsafe, only that there is a lack of redundancy in its design. What is a bridge's "sufficiency rating?" Sufficiency ratings were developed by the Federal Highway Administration to serve as a prioritization tool to allocate funds. The rating varies from 0 percent(poor) to 100 percent (very good). The formula considers structural adequacy, whether the bridge is functionally obsolete and level of service provided to the public. History of Federal Bridge Inspection Program The federal bridge inspection program regulations were developed as a result of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1968 following the collapse of the Silver Bridge in Point Pleasant, West Virginia. The United States Secretary of Transportation established the National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS) to locate and evaluate existing bridge deficiencies to ensure the safety of the traveling public. The 1968 Federal-Aid Highway Act directed the states to maintain an inventory of federal-aid highway system bridges. This was amended over time to establish criteria for NBIS bridges including: • Defining the NBIS to bridges to those on the federal-aid highway system • Requiring inspections of bridges longer than 20 feet on all public roads • Expanding bridge inspection programs to include special inspection procedures for fracture- critical members and underwater inspection VDC1-1. Bridge L andition Code key Code Description N NOT APPLICABLE 9 EXCELLENT CONDITION 8 VERY GOOD CONDITION No problems noted. 7 GOOD CONDITION Some minor problems. 6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION Structural elements show some minor deterioration. 5 FAIR CONDITION All primary structural elements are sound but may have some minor section loss (due to corrosion), cracking, spalling (deterioration of concrete surface) or scour (erosion of soil) 4 POOR CONDITION Advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour. 3 SERIOUS CONDITION Loss of section, deterioration, spalling or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION Advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the bridge until corrective action is taken. 1 "IMMINENT" FAILURE CONDITION Major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Bridge is closed to traffic but corrective action may put back in light service. 0 FAILED CONDITION Out of service - beyond corrective action. Guide to Codes and Acronyms The following is a guide to codes and acronyms used in the TIP project spreadsheet for Jefferson County. FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION 02 Rural Other Principal Arterial 09 Rural Local Access 06 Rural Minor Arterial 17 Urban Collector 07 Rural Major Collector 19 Urban Local Access 08 Rural Minor Collector IMPROVEMENT TYPES per the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 01 New construction roadway 15 Preliminary Engineering 03 Reconstruction-added capacity 16 Right-of-Way 04 Reconstruction-no added capacity 17 Construction Engineering 05 4R Maintenance-resurfacing 18 Planning 06 4R Maintenance-restoration&rehabilitation 19 Research 07 4R Maintenance-relocation 20 Environmental only 08 Bridge-new construction 21 Safety 10 Bridge replacement-added capacity 22 Rail/highway crossing 11 Bridge replacement-no added capacity 23 Transit 13 Bridge rehabilitation-added capactiy 24 Traffic Management/Engineering-HOV 14 Bridge rehabilitation-no added capacity 25 Vehicle Weight Enforcement 40 Special Bridge 26 Ferry Boats 48 Bridge Protection 27 Administration 49 Bridge Inspection&Training 28 Facilities for Pedestrians&Bicycles FUNDING STATUS S=Secured (funded); P=Planned (unfunded) PROJECT PHASE PE= Preliminary Engineering; R/W = Right-of-Way; CN = Construction Guide to Codes and Acronyms The following is a guide to codes and acronyms used in the TIP project spreadsheet for Jefferson County. FEDERAL FUND CODES(applicable to Jefferson County) ER Emergency Relief FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency Hazard Mitigation Program FLAP Federal Lands Access Program HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program NFPP National Fish Passage Program PILT Payment in Lieu of Taxes SRS Secure Rural School STBG Surface Transportation Block Grant STP-R Surface Transportation Program-Rural STP-S Surface Transportation Program-Safety STP-TA Surface Transportation Program-Transportation Alternatives WAFH Washington Forest Highways Program STATE FUND CODES(applicable to Jefferson County) ALEA Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account CAPP County Arterial Preservation Program FBRB Fish Barrier Removal Board NOVA Non-Highway and Off-Road Vehicle Activities Program PBP Pedestrian and Bicycle Program PSAR Puget Sound Acquisition and Restoration Fund RAP Rural Arterial Program RRG Recreation Resource Grant SRFB Salmon Recovery Funding Board SRTS Safe Routes to School Program WWRP Washington Wildlife Recreation Program OTHER FUND CODES(applicable to Jefferson County) PIF Public Infrastructure Fund ENVIRONMENTAL TYPE CE Categorically Exempt DCE Documented Categorically Exempt EA Environmental Assessment EIS Environmental Impact Statement SEPA State Environmental Protection Act Department of Public Works O Regular Agenda: 10:00 AM Page 1 of 1 Jefferson County Board of Commissioners Agenda Request To: Board of Commissioners Philip Morley, County Administrator From: Monte Reinders, PE, Public Works Director/County Enginee Agenda Date: November 5, 2018 Subject: Adoption of 2019-2024 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program Statement of Issue: Conduct a public hearing for the purpose of receiving public testimony concerning adoption of the 2019-2024 Jefferson County Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Analysis / Strategic Goals / Pros Et Cons: RCW 36.81.121 requires the annual adoption of a six-year transportation improvement program after holding a public hearing. The purpose of the law is to "assure that each county shall perpetually have available advanced plans looking to the future for not less than six years as a guide in carrying out a coordinated transportation program" (RCW 36.81.121(1)). Fiscal Impact / Cost-Benefit Analysis: The TIP relies heavily on the availability of outside grant and program funding from the State and Federal government. Fiscal impact is evaluated through the annual budgeting process including adoption of an Annual (Road) Construction Program. Recommendation: After considering public testimony, approve by Resolution the proposed Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program. Return a signed copy of the Resolution to Public Works for further processing. Department Contact: Wendy Clark-Getzin, PE, Transportation Planner, 360-385-9162 Reviewed By: -� ,/, Philip Morley, ount ,Administra or Date