HomeMy WebLinkAbout821312001 Stormwater Mgmt ACE PAVING JEFFERSON COUNTY
BATCH PLANT OEP[ OF COMMUNI'I'Y DEVELOPMENT
SHINE GRAVEL PIT
LOCATED IN SWl/4, SEC.32, TWP.27 N., RGE. 1 E., W.M.
AND
LOCATED IN SEI/4, SEC.31, TWP.27 IN., RGE. 1 E., W.M.
JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON
May 4, 2000
PREPARED FOR:
Ace Paving Co., Inc.
P.O. Box 4520
Bremerton, WA 98312
(360) 479-4200
PREPARED BY:
Team 4 Engineering
Suite A, Box 2
5823 NE Minder Road ........ ~¥
Poulsbo, WA. 98370
(360) 297-5560
TABLE OF CONTENTS
L LOCATION PG. 2
H. DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT PG. 2
HI. PRE-DEVELOPMENT SITE CONDITIONS PG. 3
IV. UPSTREAM ANALYSIS PG. 3
V. DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS PG. 3
VL OVERVIEW OF PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES PG. $
VII. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS PG. 4
VIII. HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS PG. 4
IX. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PG. 5
X. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PG. 6
FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP PG. 9
FIGURE 2 BATCH PLANT LAYOUT PG. 10
FIGURE 3 SOILS MAP PG. 11
FIGURE 4 DOWNSTREAM MAP PG. 12
FIGURE ,~ DEVELOPED SITE CONDITIONS PG. 13
rX~I?S
EXHIBIT 1 HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUPS PG. 14
EXHIBIT 2 CURVE NUMBERS PG. 15
EXHIBIT 3 MANNING'S COEFFICIENTS PG. 16
EXHIBIT 4 2 YR, 24 HR ISOPLUVIAL PG. 17
EXHIBIT 5 10 YR, 24 HR ISOPLUVIAL PG. 18
EXHIBIT 6 100 YR, 24 HR ISOPLUVIAL PG. 19
ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT 1 CATCH BASIN FILTER SPECIFICATIONS PG. 20
ATTACHMENT 2 POND VOLUME CALCULATIONS .pQ. 23
ATTACHMENT 3 BIOSWALE DESIGN PG. 24
ATTACHMENT 4 MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES PG. 25
LO, iTEM
L LOCATION
The development site is located in the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of
Section 32, Township 27 North, Range 1 East, W.M., and in the Southeast quarter of the
Southeast quarter of Section 31, Township 27 North, Range 1 East, W.M., in Jefferson
County, Washington. The site is situate south of SR 104, approximately 1.0 mile east of
the intersection of Highway 104 and Beaver Valley Road. Ace Paving's asphalt batch
plant is located on sub-leased land. Fred Hill Materials, Inc. (FHM) lease the land from
Olympic Resource Management (See Figure 1 - Vicinity Map.)
II. DESCRIPTION OF DEVELOPMENT
The Ace Paving asphalt batch plant is currently in operation under a 30-day temporary
permit granted under the existing Department of Ecology (DOE) Sand and Gravel Permit
for Fred Hill Materials at the Shine Pit. The permit number is WAG 50-1120.
This Stormwater Drainage Report is developed in support of an application for a Sand
and Gravel Permit for the Ace Paving asphalt batch plant. The stormwater analysis
covers those portions of the site which Ace Paving will utilize in its operations as well as
some surrounding areas as discussed below.
The batch plant and the surrounding area have been paved to help prevent erosion and
sedimentation and to collect all stormwater generated on this site. The surrounding area
includes Fred Hill Materials' maintenance facility and scale house. Also included in this
area are shared access roads. The existing impervious area is 2.46 acres.
Stormwater analysis has been completed for the existing impervious areas as well as a
future 200' x 200' impervious area which will be located adjacent to the batch plant.
This impervious area may be constructed in the future under a separate permit. For
design purposes, it is included in the total impervious calculations. The total basin area
for treatment of stormwater is 3.38 acres.
Stormwater from the 3.38 acres of impervious areas is directed to a sedimentation trap
located northwest of the batch plant. No process water is created or discharged from the
asphalt batch plant operations. The sedimentation trap was originally designed as a 100%
retention facility for impervious areas surrounding the asphalt batch plant. Current
design modifies the retention pond to serve as a sedimentation trap prior to discharg6 ~b
the water quality facility. --
The water quality facility is composed of two oil water separators and a bioswale
designed to treat the design storm event, the 1 O-year, 24-hour storm event. The bioswale
ends in a weir outlet that will serve as a sampling point for discharge of stormwater from
Ace Paving's site. After water quality treatment, stormwater discharges to the process
water ponds serving Fred Hill Materials. Once this Type 3 stormwater comes into
LOG TEM
contact with process water, it becomes process water. Process water is covered under
Fred Hill Material's Sand and Gravel Permit, WAG 50-1120.
~I. PRE-DEVELOPMENT SITE CONDITIONS
The site that has been developed was previously utilized for gravel and sand stockpiles.
The area surrounding the batch plant will continue to be utilized for stockpiling to serve
both Fred Hill Materials and the asphalt batch plant.
IV. UPSTREAM ANALYSIS
No stormwater enters the 3.83-acre impervious area. Asphalt and earth berms prevent the
flow of off-site water onto the basin area.
V. DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS
Stormwater runoff from the impervious site is collected in a series of catch basins and
directed to a stormwater sedimentation pond. After passing through the sedimentation
pond, stormwater is piped to a bioswale, which provides water quality treatment. After
the bioswale, stormwater mixes with process water which is utilized at the rock crushing
facility serving Fred Hill Materials.
VI. OVERVIEW OF PROPOSED STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
STRATEGIES
The Stormwater Management strategy selected for this project includes the following
elements:
· Pre-settling will occur in an impercious sedimentation trap that will retain 11,400
c.f. of stormwater from the impervious area.
· The Water Quality Mitigation facilities will consist of (2) catch basin filter
inserts, (2) oil-water separators and a bioswale. The catch basin filter inserts are
designed to trap sediment and petroleum products and are installed in the first two
catch basins. Oil-water separators are installed in the catch basin immediately
prior to the sedimentation pond and immediately following the sedimentation.
pond.. The bioswale is designed to treat the 1 O-year, 24-hour storm event rurioff
from the impervious areas-. The bioswale is designed at 200 feet in length, 4 feet
in width and 1.4 feet in depth (Design depth of flow = 0.4 feet).
LOG..ffEM
VII. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS
The Washington State Department of Ecology defines technical requirements for Sand &
Gravel Permits, which includes asphalt batch plants. The base level Operational BMPs to
be implemented on the site include Good Housekeeping, Preventive Maintenance, Spill
Prevention & Emergency Cleanup, Inspections, and Employee Training. The BMPs
selected for this site are listed in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP).
BMP's implemented at the site will be supplemented as required to maintain water
quality criteria. Ace Paving, Co. Inc. has prepared and submitted the SWPPP to the
Department of Ecology's Southwest Regional Office.
The bioswale designed to treat the design storm event from the impervious areas slopes at
less than the recommended range as described in the Department of Ecology's
Stormwater Management Manual for the Puget Sound Basin. However, considering the
soils at. this site are rapidly permeable, it is unlikely that any ponding will occur as
stormwater passes through the bioswale.
VH. HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS
Runoff computations utilize the SCS-based hydrograph method, Santa Barbara Urban
Hydrograph (SBUH) method with Type lA, 24-hour rainfall distribution.
The hydrological analysis was performed using WaterWorksHMS (Release 6.1.3.0) by
Engenious Systems, Inc.
Other parameters are as follows:
· Hydrologic Soil Groups; See Exhibit 1
· Runoff Curve Numbers (CN), Type lA Storm; See Exhibit 2 - Curve
Numbers.
· Manning's Coefficients, See Exhibit 3 - Manning Coefficients/"K"
Factors.
· 2 year, 24 hour Precipitation Isopluvial; See Exhibit 4
· 10 year, 24 hour Precipitation Isopluvial; See Exhibit 5
· 100 year, 24 hour Precipitation Isopluvial; See Exhibit 6
The project precipitation data is as follows;
Project Precips
[2 yr] 2.25 in -
[10 yr] 3.25 in
[100 yr] 4.00 in
1. POST DEVELOPED CONDITIONS:
The post-developed conditions are analyzed as impervious cover (See Figure 5- Post-
Developed Conditions). The basin boundary is coincident with the asphalt cover.
The following data from the History File of Waterworks for this project presents the
parameters and results of the analysis:
Drainage Area: Asphalt
Hyd Method: SBUH Hyd Loss Method: SCS CN Number
Peak Factor. 484.00 SCS Abs: 0.20
Storm Dur 24.00 hrs
Area CN TC
Pervious 0.0000 ac 0.00 0.00 hrs
Impervious 3.3800 ac 98.00 0.02 hrs
Total 3.3800 ac
Supporting Data:
Impervious CN Data:
As-built Asphalt Area at Batch Plant 98.00 3.3800 ac
Impervious TC Data:
Flow type: Description: Length: Slope: Coeff: Travel Time
Sheet Default- 5min. 100.00 ft 2.00% 0.0110 1.44 min
TC of 1.44 min < 5 min, program will use a tc of 5 min in computations.
6 mo Flow Time Volume
Summary: 1.1144 cfs 7.83 hrs 15107.26 cf - 0.3468 acft
2 yr Flow Time Volume
Summary: 1.8153 cfs 7.83 hrs 24819.47 cf - 0.6698 acft
10 yr Flow Time Volume
Summary: 2.6793 cfs 7.83 hrs 37031.62 cf- 0.8501 acft
100 yr Flow Time Volume
Summary: 3.3225 cfs 7.83 hrs 46204.89 cf - 1.0607 acft
~ STORMWATER QUALITY ENHANCEMENT FACILITIES
The stormwater quality enhancement facilities consist of four elements. The first
stormwater quality enhancement feature is a catch basin filter insert (See Attachment 1
for specifications). The second feature is two oil water separators which are detailed in
the attached engineering drawings. Both the inserts and the oil-water separators act as
preventative agents against the release of petroleum products into the sedimentation trap
and into the bioswale. The third feature is a sedimentation trap which will provide
sediment storage as well as detention time for stormwater with suspended particulatgs,
The fourth t~amre of the stormwater quality enhancement thcilities is a bioswale~ 'The
bioswale is designed to treat thedesign storm event, the 10-year, 24-hour storm. In the
event of a release to the bioswale, the grass cover will filter out petroleum products.
IX. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
Erosion and Sediment Control is provided by paving the ground surfac~ surrounding the
batch plant and FIlM maintenance operations.
X. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE: The leaseholder is responsible for the
maintenance, operation or repair of stormwater drainage system and Best Management
Practices (BM/"s). Leaseholders shall maintain, operate and repair the stormwater
management facilities in compliance with the requirements of this Manual.
MAINTENANCE FREQUENCY: Stormwater facilities shall be inspected and
maintained routinely and cleared of debris, sediment and vegetation when the functioning
and/or design capacity of the facility is affected. Where insufficient maintenance is
causing or contributing to a water quality problem, immediate action shall be taken to
correct the problem.
DISPOSAL OF WASTE FROM MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES: Disposal of waste
from maintenance activities shall be conducted in accordance with the minimum
Functional Standards for Solid Waste Handling, Chapter 173-304 WAC, guidelines for
disposal of waste materials from stormwater maintenance activities, and where
appropriate, the Dangerous Waste Regulations, Chapter 173-303 WAC. In addition, the
D.O.E. "Technical Manual" addresses disposal procedures.
A. BIOFILTRATION SWALES: Biofiltration swales provide stormwater quality
enhancement through filtration and absorption of pollutants, sediments and nutrients.
Bioswales planted in grass must be mowed regularly during the growing season to
promote growth and pollutant uptake. Fertilizing and watering ofbioswales may be
required to ensure a vigorous and dense stand of grass. Mowing of the bioswale should
not result in a grass height shorter than the design flow fbr the facility. For this project the
minimum cutting height for mowing should be 5". In addition, the following tasks shall
be accomplished;
· Remove and dispose of cuttings promptly, so that no pollutants can enter
downstream facilities or the receiving waters.
· The mowing program should result in the grass height at the end of the
growing season be 2 inches higher than the design flow depth. For this
facility the grass height should be a minimum of 7 inches during the
w/nter months.
· Remove emergent wetland type plants from the bioswale at each mowing
operation.
· Remove sediments from the bioswale when the any of the following~
occurs; 1) sediment build up reaches a depth of 3 inches at any spot,'2)
sediments cover the bioswale vegetation, or 3) sediment accumulation
interferes with bioswale operation. If sediment removal leaves bare spots
in the bioswale, re-seed the bare areas immediately with the appropriate
grass mixture.
tTE 4
Inspect bioswales at monthly and after each period of heavy runoff.
Remove sediments, fertilize, and reseed as necessary. Avoid over
fertilizing or introducing fertilizer to receiving water or ground water.
· Clean curb cuts when soil, vegetation, or other matter interferes with
runoff flow introduction to the bioswale.
· Provide educational materials and information for employees and building
occupants regarding the purpose and importance of proper maintenance of
the bioswale.
· Remove litter in order to keep bioswales attractive in appearance.
· Roadside ditch cleaning should be based on an analysis of hydraulic
necessity. Remove only the sediment necessary to restore needed
hydraulic capacity, leaving vegetation in place to the maximum extent
possible.
See Attachment IV for Maintenance Guidelines, prepared by Kitsap County, for
additional information and expectations regarding maintenance activities for bioswales.
Adherence to these maintenance requirements is critical to the long-term performance of
the bioswale.
B. CATCH BASINS: Catch basins shall be inspected on a regular basis, at least
monthly under heavy rainfall conditions and less frequently during dry weather. The most
frequent problem encountered with catch basins is an accumulation of sediments inside
the structure, blocking the flow to the outlet. To prevent this problem, these structures
should be routinely cleaned out, particularly if sediments are within 6" of the outlet.
C. SPILL CONTAINMENT OIL/WATER SEPARATORS: Spill Containment
oil/water separators must be cleaned frequently to keep accumulated oil from escaping
during storms. They must be cleaned by October 1 of each year to remove material that
has accumulated during the dry season, and again after each significant storm. In
addition, the following tasks shall be accomplished;
· Weekly inspection for waste oil, residuals, and sedimentation
accumulation. Verify the riser tee is plum and connection to outlet is
secure and not leaking
· Annual inspection of ladder or safety steps to ensure firm and solid
connection to wall of unit.
· Waste oil, residuals, and sediments removed from the facility will be
disposed of in accordance with current Jefferson County Health District
requirements, as well as with State and Federal law.
· Standing water removed during the maintenance operation must be.-"-
disposed of to a s_an. itary sewer at a discharge location approved by
Jefferson County.
· All standing water removed from the facility will be replaced with clean
water. This must be done to prevent oil from passing through the outlet.
See attached Maintenance Guidelines (Attachment 4) for additional information and
expectations regarding maintenance of Spill Containment Oil/Water Separators. This
7
LO6 TEM _, ,
oil/water separator discharges to process water utilized in the rock washing operations. It
is crucial that all potential oil spills be avoided and that prompt containment of any spills
is effective to eliminate oil from entering the stormwater management system.
D. SEDIMENTATION TRAP: The sedimentation trap is designed to collect
sediments suspended in stormwater. The trap has a total useable depth of four feet.
Inspect the trap monthly and remove sediments when they reach a depth of one foot.
Disposal requirements are the same as listed above for Oil/water separators.
FIGURE 1- VICINITY MAP
LOG
~A"FC, I,-I PLANT- LAYOUT"
FIGURE $ - SOILS MAP
L.OG..· ~,TF_M I .>.,,,,"uq
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN
Table m.1,6 Hydroioli¢ Soil Or~p~ fo~ ~oil~ in tho Puget ,%ound Ikiin
Hydrologic ~U Hydrologic ~il
Soil T~ O~p SoU T~g G~p
A~ C Coimr C
~1 B Cus~r ND
~ C Da~ ND
~e~ C ~lphi D
~, ~ B ~k ND
~, Ev~.u B Di~ D
~ B ~ D
~ B ~ C
~ C ~k C
~u~a~ B ~d. ~
~lfm C ~1 ~
~lli~m D Ev~u A
~ll~m va~m C Evian D
~i~f~ 8 Galvin D
~ D O~hell A
Bfi~m D Oiloo B
~o~oy C O~f~y D
~ B O~8~r A
Ca~y C Om~ C
Ca~y ND Ha~ ND
Ca.carl B Hoko ND
Ce~l~ B H~o. ND
~ehali8 B H~gda{ C
Ci~ B Huel ND
~ C ~h~b ND
Ch~ B Jom~ B
C~ ~c~ va~k lu~ ND
Hydrologic Soil Group Classifications
A. (Low runoff potential). Soils havlRg high infiltration rates, even when
thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of deep, well-to-excessively drained
sands or gravels. These soils have ~.high rate of water transmission.
B. (Moderately iow runoff potential')? Soils having moderate infiltration rates
when thoroughly we=ted, and consisting chiefly of moderately fine to moderately
coarse textures. These soils have n moderate rate of water transmission.
C. (Moderately high runoff potential). Soils having slow infiltration rates when
thoroughly wetted, and consisting chiefly of soils with a layer that impedes
downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine to fine textures.
These soils have a slow rate of water transmission.
D. (High runoff potential). Soils having very slow infiltration rates when
thoroughly wetted and c~nsisting chiefly of clay soils with'a h~gh swelling
potential, soils with a per, anent high water table, soils wi~h-~ hardpan or
clay layer at or near the surface, and shallow soils over nearly impervious
material. These soils-have a very slow rate of water transmission.
~Data not currently available for this soil type.
*From SCS, TR-55, Second Edition, June 1986, Exhibit A-1. Revisions made from
SCS, Soil Interpretation Race=d, Form #5, September 1988 and various county sol'
surveys.
III-l-10 FEBRUARY, 199~
TEMEXHIBIT 1 - HYDROLOGIGAL SOIl GROUPS
SCS Western Washington Runoff.Curve Numbers
Runoff.curve humbert for selected agricultural, suburban, and urban land use for Type IA rainfall distribution, 24-hour store
duration. (Published by SCS in 1982)
LAND USE DESCRIPTION CURVE NUMBERS BY
HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP
A B C D
Cultivated land ~: Winter condition 86 91 94 95
Mountain open areas: Low growing brush & grassland 74 82 89 92
Meadow or pasture: 65 78 85 89
Wood or forest lan,d: Undisturbed 42 64 76 81
Established second growth 4 48 68 78 83
Young second growth or brush 55 72 81 86
Orchard: With cover crop 81 88 92 94
Open spaces, lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries, landscaping
Good condition: Grass cover on >.. 75% of area 68 80 86 90
Fair condition: Grass cover on 50-?5% of area 77 85 90 92
Gravel roads &.parking lots: 76 85 89 91
Dirt roads & parking lots: 72 82 87 89
Impervious surfaces, pa';'ement, roofs, etc. ~ 98 98 98
Open water bodies: Lakes, wetlands, ponds, etc. 100 100 100 100
Single family residential
Dwelling unit/gross acre % Impervious ~ Separate curve number shall be
1.0 DU/GA 15 selected for pervious and impervious'
1.5 DU/OA 20 portions of thc site or basin.
2.0 DU/GA 25
2.5 DU/GA 30
:3.0 DU/GA 34
3.5 DU/GA 38
4.0 DU/GA 42
4.5 DU/GA 46
5.0 DU/GA 48
5.5 DU/GA 50
6.0 DU/GA 52
6,5 DU/GA 54
7,0 DU/GA 56
PUDs, condos, apartments, % impervious
commercial businesses &: must be computed
industrial areas
For a more detailed description of agricultural land use curve numbers, refer to National Engineering Handbook, Sec
4, Hydrology, Chapter 9, August 1972.
Assumes roof and driveway runoff, is dh'ected into street/storm system.
The remaining pervious areas (lawn) are considered to be in good condition for these curve numbers.
Modified by KCPW, 1995.
EXHIBIT 2 - CURVE NUMBERS
"n" AND "k" Values Used in Time Calculations for Hydrographs
"ns" Sheet Fl°w Equation Manning's Values (for the initial 300 ft. of travel) ns
Smooth surfaces (concrete, asphalt, gravel, or bare hand packed soil) 0.011
Fallow fields or loose soil surface (no residue) 0.05
Cultivated soil with residue cover (s< 0.20 f-t/fl) 0.06
Cultivated soil with residue cover (s > 0.20 fi/fi) 0.17
Short prairie grass and lawns 0.15
Dense grasses 0.24
Bermuda grass 0.41
Range (natural) 0.13
Woods or forest with light underbrush 0.40
Woods or forest with dense underbrush 0.80
*Manning values for sheet flow only, from Overton and Meadows 1976 (See TR-55, 1986)
"k" Values Used in Travel Time/Time of Concentration Calculations
Shallow Concentrated Flow (After the initial 300 ft,. of sheet flow, R = 0.1) ks
1. Forest with heavy ground litter and meadows (n = 0.10) 3
2. Brushy ground with some trees (n = 0.060) 5
3. Fallow or minimum tillage cultivation (n = 0.040) 8
4. High grass (n = 0.035) 9
5. Short grass, pasture, and lawns (n = 0.030) 11
6. Nearly bare ground (n = 0.025) 13
7. Paved and gravel areas (n = 0.012) 27
**Channel flow (intermittent) (At beginning of visible channels R = 0.2) kc
1. Forested swale with heavy ground litter (n = 0.10) 5
2. Forested drainage course/ravine with defined channel bed (n = 0.050)10
3. Rock-lined waterway (n = 0.035) 15
4. Grassed waterway (n = 0.030) 17
5. Earth-lined waterway (n = 0.025) 20
6. CMP pipe (n -- 0.024) 21
7. Concrete pipe (0.012) 42
8. Other waterways and pipe 0.508/n
Channel Flow (Continuous stream, R -- 0.4) kc
9. Meandering stream with some pools (n = 0.040) 20
10. Rock-lined stream (n = 0.035) 23
11. Grass-lined stream (n = 0.030) .. ~ 27
12. Other streams, man-made channels and pipe 0.807/n**
**See Table 7-3 for additional Mannings "n" values for open channels.
EXHIBIT.5 - MANNING'S COEFFICIENTS
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN
124 123 122 121
49~
I
. FRIDAY HARBOF;
!
WASHINGTON
10 0 10 ~0 30 40
; ' - ' ~ MILES
Fisur125 -
'~S' 'NOAA ATLAS 2, Volu/~ IX
ISOPLUVIALS ( 2,YR 24-HR PRECIPITATI* N IN ~)y u.s~ Dep, rtrr~n!
TE~HS OF A~ INCH
, :' Ind Atmolp~r~ ~ Umtniltrlt~n
~e, ~e or,Hydrology
i~e~r~ for U S ~n~nt of A~icu~ure.
124 123 122 121
~~ ~BR~
L~ ITE~xHI~ 4 - ~ Y~, ~ HB. I~PL~IAL
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN
24 123 122 121
49.L ! I
\ 'RT, MME
~UNT~
17.5
AC~)MA
WASHINGTON
10 0 10 20 30 40 ~ ,~ ....
/
PreDere~ by U.S, D~ertmeflt of Co'me,ce
ISOPLUVIALS OF 10-YR 24-HR PRECIPITi lION Nlt~l~e'n<ln~AtmolD~ricA~mini,trlt~
IN TENTHS OFJAN INCH Nit.nil Welther ~ice, ~e of Hyarololy
124 123 ]22 121
HXHIB~ 5- ~0 Y~., 24 H~. IBOPLUVIAt
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN
124 123 122 121
lO ~
15.
I I00,
IOl~,
: I'
' WASHINGTON
10 0. 10 20 30 40
i Figure 30 / - i NOAA ATLAS
2,
Volume
IX
J ISOPLUVIALSriff IO0.YR 24.HR PRECIPITATION , Pre~r~ by U.,~ I:~i~..~m of Cdmmerce
: Nltlonll Ocemmc end Atmompher~c N~ministrlflOn
, IN TENTHS OF~AN INCH Nltmnll Welther Service, Off,ce ofjH¥clrolol¥
· / Preper~ for U.S. Oepertment of A~iculture
e I~ ~oil Conse~vltion 5erwce, £nllne~nl DiVilmn
124 123 122 12i
III-1-46 FI~ BRUA,RY, 1992
EXHIBIT 6 - 100 YR., 24 HR./SOPLUVIAL
LOG ITEM ~,.~,,,, ~g.~.~. _
ATTACHMENT 1
CATCH BASIN FILTER SPECIFICATIONS
LOG, iTEM
NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION CONTROL PRODUCTS
The SI reamGuard line of producls incorporates innovalive designs and new technologies Io provide efficienl, cost
effeclive sol ut ions. ~lcnsi~'olylesl~ nnd engineered, each dcvicc is d~ign~ {o mm~vc poflulanls from ~nlam inal~ wa~cr.
StreamGuard Oil & Grease Catch Basin insert (#300 mo )(#3o2
~iYlt NEW NON-LEACHINO CO-POLYMER ABSORBENT~
~is oil-only mo~ei is equyped wifl~ an oil ~bso~ent polymer. Unlike ~mm~
adsorbents, rite oleophilic S~rcamOu~rdm polvmennedia will nol de{edo~te c. ·
~l~se ab~o~ hydmca~0n~, As contaminat~ water flowsthrough
gcotexfilc Eab~c abso~s oil and rc~ainssediment. Once contaminants have a~umu-
lated, lhe body of the unil ~llswhh con{amina{~ water and s~iment is collected in
{he bottom of the inscm Floafingoil and grease arc abso~ by rite SlrcamOuard Co-
Polymer contained in a screen bag fixed wil,hin fl~c uniL Great ~or parking lots and
vehicle stooge areas. FITS ANY SIZ~ CATCH BASIN UP TO 30"x 40"! I/pack
2.Glbs. NOTE: Reuse oFIhc °il unil is not recommended duc 1o fire polenlial lot
release ofcaplured oil{l~at is absorbed in'tim insc~ fabric. Ifha~rdous m~cHals arc
bo present in rite s~onmva~cr, disposal ohhe insets should be in accordm~cc wifl~ local
environmental regulations,
INSq'A I.I~TI O N:
I) Remove catch.basin grating
2) Clenn dlr{ ~nd debris from Adaptorski~
grating ledge. ([or ~ p=r~c~ Rclricval strap
3) Lay S,reamOuard inset, ove~ fi')~
fl~e ea~eh basin opening wifi~ 48" .
the bag side of lhe inse~ inside 36"
the basin.
4) Replace lhe grating, pinching
Ihe,insefl ~abfie betw~n tlie
grating and lhe catch basin.
5) Cm fl~e excess fabric offwith
abladckoirc. A3~ofiveinch ~ I disch~~~/~ Oo~pass
wide a,~p or ~abdc should be ~eol=t~~~~ak morm 24"
left around the outside o~flte fabdc ~ volumes)
~ting ifin~, is Io be ~us~.
~AIHTEHANCE:
~e Str~mGua~ inserts foroil =e
d~i~med to o~te ~or up to 3 {o 6
monlhs under no~al ~ndifio~. Where Oil abso~en{
h~vy oil ~or s~iment contamination . . co~ol~ner Sedimen{ a~umulati~
em p~sent fl~e unitwill have a md~ ~
life expectancy. ~e a~umulafion o~ FRODU~ SeECIFICATIOHS
~iment can ~ dete~in~ ~y probing ~ ~ Value
with a ya~ stick. When lbo unit has Fabric_Weight ~ ~5261 o~yd= 8.0
~llec~M about 6 inches ofs~iment it is Thickness ~ D-5199 mils 145
~mme~ded flint it be replace. ~m Water Flow Ra{e ASTM D~91 ~m/fl= 120,
unit should also be~placed if flee oil ~n Total Surface Area by measuremenl square feet 18
~ ~en floating on limewater in lhe bag. it Permeability ASTM D4491 c~gc .5
is ~ommended flm~ lhe inserts be U.V. Resistance ASTM D4355 % 70
· ~te Iolal wa{~ flow role Ihmugh Ihe
regularly inspected and obsemafions l~lmalely2,0gp,,t' . [ns~inne,v~ndil~ni, lnex.sof,~gpm. ~eove~wm=
logged as a besl management p~cti~.LOG
~g shee~ is inelud~ wifl~ ~eh unit~ ~ For AdditionRI hffonnafion &Our Cu~nl Product Catalog .....
Oil Grease Insert Maintenance Log
It is r~commcnded that inserts be monitored once a month under normal conditions, Where Imavy rain or snowfall is present or
where large volumes ofoil or sediment arc an issue inserts should be monitored more frequently,
GENERAL COMPANY INFORMATION:
;)ATE: TECHNICIAN: SUPERVISOR
FACILITY: -'
STREET ABDRESS: ·
CI~, STATE ZIP: CONTACT PHONE NUMBER: . ( ) .
CONTACT NAME: 24.HOURCONTACT NUMBER: ( ) . '
Date Rainfall since Amount of Square Feet.of drainage Obse~ations &.Gommen~
last inspection sediment present area for this Catch Basin (~)
(in inches) in unit (in inches),
~ppcars more than 7~% soaked ~{~ oil ancot if th~ ~{icr pack is completely swel{cd to doub{c
ri~inal size, rep{acemeni is recommended. If thc Sediment unit h~ 5+ inches ofsedim~ni, thc unii shou{d bc emptied and rcinsta{[~.
REORDER INFORMATION
Oompl~te th~ form below and fax to (888) 234-3677 or order on-linc at: www,fossenv.com 24-hours a day.
Call (800) 909-36?7 for ~sistance from 6:00a.m, to 6:00 p,m. Monday-Friday PST.
Foss Nam~escfiptlon Quantl~ Unit P~ce ~ended Bill To/S~ip To: '
Pmdp~ ~ Pdce
' ~1 ~ & O~se In~d $ 93 Nam~mpany:
, Address:
Ci~, Slate Zip:
...... ~one (must {n~ude): .....
UPS Ground_, _ ~ Day ~r ,, Ne~ay
· oderoate:
UPS ~e~ht ~arg~ will ~ ~epaid'and
~HOD OF PAYMENT:
~ Customer Purchase Order PO ~ * Note: Our te~s are Net 30 days
~ Credit Card Credit Card ~ Expiration Date:
CardType: ~ ~sa ~ Master. rd ~ Amed~n ~press CardholdeFs Name:
ATTACHMENT 2
POND VOLUME CALCULATIONS
JOB NO. 122A
PROJECT: SHINE GRAVEL PIT BY: ASL
CLIENT: ACE PAVING/FRED HILL MATERIALS DATE APRIL 21,00
ft. sq. ft. ft. END AREA cu. ft. SUMMATION
303,5 590
0.5 961.5 480.75 480.75
304 1333
2 2315.5 4631 5111,75
306 3298
1,5 4199.5 6299.25 11411.00
307.5 5101
ATTACHMENT 3
BIOSWALE DESIGN WORKSHEET
Job No. 122A
Project Name ACE PAVING AT SHINE PIT
By: ASL
Client FRED HILL MATERIALS Date: 4124/00
Q=(l.486/n)*A*R^2/3*S ^112
where: Q= Flow Rate, in cfs input: B= 4 ft.
V= Velocity, in fps S= 0.01 ft./ff.
n= Roughness coefficient, Q 10 yr= 2.68 cfs
A= Area of cross section, in sf Q 100yr= 3.32 cfs
R= Hydraulic Radius
S= Slope, in f/f
calculate:
requirements: n= 0.07 Q Design= Q 10 year 2.68
3 to 1 sideslopes (see p. 13, Storm Drainage Report)
Q match d A R V
find: Q 2.680 cfs
0.194 0.100 0.430 0.098 0.450 select: V= 1.160 fps
0.649 0.200 0.920 0.192 0.705 check: V<1.5 fps YES
1.344 0.300 1.470 0.283 0.914
2.281 0.400 2.080 0.371 1.097 Length = 200 ft
2.726 0.440 2.341 0.406 1.164
3.469 0.500 2.750 0.458 1.262
4.921 0.600 3.480 0.544 1.414
requirements: n= 0.04
Q match d A R V check stability:
0.104 0.050 0.208 0.049 0.500
0.339 0.100 0.430 0.098 0.788
0.684 0.150 0.668 0.145 1.025 find: Q 100yr 3.320 cfs
1.136 0.200 0.920 0.192 1.234 check: V<3.0 ? YES
1.691 0.250 1.188 0.238 1.424 d<1.0 ? Y~ES
3.368 0.365 1.860 0.341 1.811
4.275 0.415 2.177 0.3_8_5 1.964
5.292 0.465 2.509 0.428 2.110
6.423 0.515 2.856 0.471 2.249
Design:
Total depth of bioswale = Max. d + 1.0'
= 1.37 feet