HomeMy WebLinkAbout02 0128 08
ec "1?~U.
p~ iMDrl
5~e (~W
STATE OF WASHINGTON
County of Jefferson
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING FIVE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS,
FILE NUMBERS
MLA07-70 [TUKEY],
MLA07-79 [GILLANDERS],
MLA07-90 [BRODERS],
MLA07-99 [MCCARTHY],
MLA07-100 [MCCARTHY]
MLA07-104 [JEFFERSON COUNTY]
[FORWARDED TO 2008 CYCLE]
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
Ordinance No. 02-0128-08
WHEREAS, the Board of Jefferson County Commissioners ("the Board") has, as
required by the Growth Management Act ("the GMA"), as codified at RCW 36.70A.OI0
et seq., set in motion and now completed the proper professional review and public notice
and comment with respect to any and all proposed amendments to the County's
Comprehensive Plan originally adopted by Resolution No. 72-98 on August 28, 1998 and
as subsequently amended, and;
WHEREAS, as mandated by the GMA, the Board has reviewed and voted upon
the proposed amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan ("CP") that composed the
2007 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket ("the Docket"), and;
WHEREAS, of the ten (10) proposals that compose the Docket, three (3) were
rejected; one proposal, MLA06-87, was approved and is not part of this ordinance; and
another proposal, MLA07 -104, has been forwarded to the 2008 CP Cycle; the Board has
approved or approved with conditions five (5) of those proposals-MLA07-70 [Tukey],
MLA07-79 [Gillanders], MLA07-90 [Broders], MLA07-99 [IMcCarthy], MLA07-100
[McCarthy], and an adopting Ordinance is required to formalize the Board's legislative
action, and;
WHEREAS, the Board makes the following Findings of Fact with respect to the
2007 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Cycle and these five amendments:
1
1. The County adopted its Comprehensive Plan in August 1998 and its development
regulations or Unified Development Code (UDC), Title 18 in the Jefferson County
Code (JCC), in December 2000. The CP was reviewed and updated in 2004.
2. The GMA, which mandates that Jefferson County generate and adopt a CP,
requires that there be a process in place to amend the CP.
3. The amendment process for the CP must be available to the citizens of this County
[including corporations and other business entities] on a regular basis. In
accordance with RCW 36.70A.130, CP amendments can generally be considered
"no more frequently than once per year."
4. This particular amendment "cycle" began on or before March 1, 2007, the
deadline for submission of a proposed CP amendment.
5. All of the amendment proposals were timely filed by March 1, 2007.
6. Nine formal site-specific amendments and three suggested amendments (for a total
of twelve) were placed on the Preliminary Docket through the CP amendment
process contained at JCC Section 18.45.050.
7. The Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners held a joint
workshop on April 4, 2007 to provide an opportunity for the site-specific CP
amendment applicants to make public presentations on their proposals.
8. The Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public hearing on the Preliminary
Docket on April 18, 2007.
9. The Planning Commission completed its recommendation on the Preliminary
Docket on April 18, 2007, recommending that all twelve original CP amendment
applications be placed on the Final Docket.
10. The Department of Community Development (DCD) issued a Review of
Preliminary Docket on May 7, 2007, analyzing the proposals on the Preliminary
Docket and offering the following recommendation: that two of the three
suggested amendments be eliminated from the Final Docket due to limitations on
staff resources.
2
11. The Board concurred with the staff recommendation and established the Final
Docket on May 14, 2007 as nine site-specific amendments plus one suggested
amendment.
12. The Department of Community Development (DCD) issued an integrated Staff
Report and State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Addendum on September 5,
2007, analyzing the proposals on the Final Docket and offering preliminary
recommendations for each.
13. All of these amendments have been subject to a SEPA-driven analysis through the
DCD Staff Report and SEPA Addendum dated September 5, 2007. In addition, a
separate Draft Environmental Impact Statement was published on this date
pertaining to the sixth approved site-specific application, MLA06-87 (Statesman),
with an associated 45-day public comment period ending at close of business on
October 24, 2007. An associated SEP A addendum was issued with the Final
Environmental Impact Statement published November 27,2007. For further
analysis of the Statesman proposal, see Ordinance No. 01-0128-08 . The
entire amendment cycle shall now be considered cumulatively with respect to a
county wide environmental review of the associated impacts of these proposals.
14. The Planning Commission held a duly-noticed public hearing on September 19,
2007. Oral public comment related to the proposed amendments was taken during
the public hearing, and written comments were accepted through the close of
business September 21, 2007.
15. The Planning Commission deliberated on the proposed amendments at a special
meeting on September 26, 2007, and at a regular meeting on October 17, 2007,
completing recommendations on November 14, 2007.
16. The above statements indicate that the proposed CP amendments were and are the
subject of "early and continuous" public participation as is required by GMA.
17. The Planning Commission recommendations were transmitted to the Board
through formal memoranda dated November 20,2007, and November 28,2007,
and are part of the record for the legislative decision.
3
18. The Planning Commission recommended approval of four of the ten proposals,
exactly as requested by the applicants, specifically MLA07-70 [Tukey], MLA07-
90 [Broders], MLA07-99 [McCarthy], and MLA07-100 [McCarthy].
19. The Planning Commission recommended approval to the Board with modification
to the proposal referred to as MLA07-79 [Gillanders], whereby in lieu of the
applicant's request to rezone from Rural Residential (RR) 1 :20 to RR 1 :5, the
property in question be "split-zoned" using the Little Quilcene River as the
boundary line, with the 12-acre area east of the river rezoned RR 1: 10, and the 28-
acre area west of the river to remain RR 1 :20.
20. The Board held a duly-noticed public hearing on the CP amendments on
November 26,2007.
21. The final DCD staff recommendations were presented to the Board during the
same November 26 public session in which the Planning Commission
recommendations were also presented.
22. The final DCD staff recommendations matched the Planning Commission
recommendations on all approved site-specific applications, and for the one
suggested amendment.
23. On December 10,2007, the Board signed Resolution No. 113-07 extending the
timeframe for the legislative decision on the proposed amendments to January 14,
2008.
24. All procedural and substantive requirements of the GMA, through the JCC (Title
18) and the Planning and Enabling Act (RCW 36.70), have been satisfied.
25. Pursuant to JCC Section 18.45.080(2)(c), for all adopted amendments the Board
shall develop findings and conclusions which consider the growth management
indicators set forth in JCC Section 18.45.050(4)(b)(i) through (vii), and also items
in JCC Section 18.45.080(1)(b)(i) through (Hi).
26. JCC Section 18.45.080(1)(c), which contains eight criteria from which the Board
must generate findings, is applicable only to site-specific Comprehensive Plan
amendments.
4
27. Inquiry into the growth management indicators (GMIs) referenced above was
begun for the 2007 Docket through the DCD integrated Staff Report and SEP A
Addendum of September 5, 2007. The Board's findings and conclusions with
respect to the growth management indicators are augmented by the September 5,
2007 staff findings and conclusions, except when and as noted below.
28. With respect to JCC Section 18.45.050(4)(b)(i), which asks whether assumptions
regarding growth and development have changed since the initial CP adoption, the
Board concludes that census data indicates that the population growth rate in this
county has slowed in the last two to four years, but may increase again during the
20-year planning horizon (until 2024) that is covered by this CPo
29. With respect to JCC Section 18.45.050(4)(b)(ii), which asks whether the capacity
of the County to provide adequate services has diminished or increased, the Board
concludes that these CP amendments will not impact the ability of the County to
provide services, and thus this particular GMI is not relevant to these amendments.
30. With respect to JCC Section 18.45.050(4)(b)(iii), which asks if sufficient urban
land is or has been designated within the County, the Board concludes that this
GMI is not relevant to any analysis of the CP amendments made effective by
adoption of this Ordinance.
31. With respect to JCC Section 18.45.050(4)(b)(iv), which asks if any of the
assumptions on which the initial CP was based have become invalid, the Board
concludes that the assumptions upon which the CP is based have generally not
changed. By the same token the Board is aware of its obligation to maintain a
variety of rural densities and expressly concludes that adoption of certain CP
amendments relating to increased Rural Residential density during this CP
amendment cycle will not trigger a "Domino Theory" of upzoning in which
neighboring parcels will necessarily and automatically receive the same treatment.
32. With respect to JCC Section 18.45.050(4)(b)(v), which asks if any of the
countywide attitudes upon which the CP was based have changed, the Board
5
concludes that the countywide attitudes have not generally changed since these CP
amendments were generally not controversial nor the subject of much opposition.
33. With respect to JCC Section 18.45.050(4)(b)(vi), which asks if there has been a
change in circumstance that may dictate the need for an amendment, the Board
concludes that there have not been any overarching or countywide changes in
circumstances that would dictate or require a shift in the policies reflected in the
CP, but that such absence should not negatively impact a proponent who comes to
the County with a proposal for a site-specific amendment to the CP based on facts
and evidence particular to her, his or its parcel(s). Site-specific applications are
entitled to careful review by the County if the CP is to remain a living document.
34. With respect to JCC Section 18.45.050(4)(b)(vii), which asks if inconsistencies
have arisen between the CP, the GMA and the Countywide Planning Policies, the
Board concludes that these amendments do not reflect any such inconsistency,
since a variety of rural residential densities is maintained even after adoption of
these CP amendments.
35. Pursuant to JCC Sections 18.45.080(2)(c) and 18.45.080(1)(b), the Board enters
the following findings and conclusions for each of the adopted amendments on the
Docket, except when and as noted below:
(1) Circumstances related to the proposed amendment and/or the area in which it is
located have not substantially changed since the adoption of the Jefferson
County Comprehensive Plan.
(2) The assumptions upon which the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan is
based continue to be valid.
(3) Based upon public testimony, the proposed amendment appears to reflect
current widely held values of the residents of Jefferson County.
36. In addition to the required findings set forth in JCC Section 18.45.080(I)(b), in
order to recommend approval of a formal site-specific proposal to amend the
Comprehensive Plan, the Board must also make eight (8) findings as specified in
JCC Section 18.45.080(1)(c)(i) through (viii).
6
37. Pursuant to JCC Section 18.45.080(1)(c), the Board enters the following findings
for each of the proposed site-specific amendments, except when and as noted
below:
(i) The proposed site-specific amendment meets concurrency requirements for
transportation and does not adversely affect adopted level of service
standards for other public facilities and services (e.g., sheriff, fire, and
emergency medical services, parks, fire flow, and general governmental
services).
(ii) The proposed site-specific amendment is consistent with the goals, policies
and implementation strategies of the various elements of the Jefferson
County Comprehensive Plan.
(iii) The proposed site-specific amendment will not result in probable
significant adverse impacts to the county's transportation network, capital
facilities, utilities, parks, and environmental features that cannot be
mitigated, and will not place uncompensated burdens upon existing or
planned service capabilities.
(iv) The subject parcel is physically suitable for the requested land use
designation and the anticipated land use development, including but not
limited to the following:
a. Access
b. Provision of utilities; and
c. Compatibility with existing and planned surrounding land uses.
(v) The proposed site-specific amendment will not create a pressure to change
the land use designation of other properties, unless the change of land use
designation for other properties is in the long-term best interests of the
County as a whole.
(vi) The proposed site-specific amendment does not materially affect the land
use and population growth projections that are the basis of the
Comprehensive Plan.
7
(vii) If within an unincorporated urban growth area (UGA), the proposed site-
specific amendment does not materially affect the adequacy or availability
of urban facilities and services to the immediate area and the overall UGA.
(viii) The proposed amendment is consistent with the Growth Management Act
(Chapter 36.70A RCW), the Countywide Planning Policy for Jefferson
County, applicable inter-jurisdictional policies and agreements, and local,
state and federal laws.
38. With respect to the five individual amendments adopted by the Board, the Board
enters the following case-specific findings and conclusions.
39. MLA07-70 for Assessors Parcel Number (APN) 921182003 is submitted by
Tukey Investment LLC. The parcel is located on the west side of Oak Bay Road,
immediately north of the junction of Oak Bay and Old Oak Bay Roads. The
applicant seeks to rezone this 20-acre site from Rural Residential (RR) 1 :20 to RR
1 :5.
40. With respect to MLA07-70, the Board unanimously concurs with and adopts as if
stated in full here the findings and conclusions in favor thereof of the Planning
Commission and the DCD Staff Report and SEPA Addendum (September 5,
2007) which discuss this CP amendment, its potential cumulative impacts and its
environmental impacts, if any. The only condition of approval is that future
development be set back (in a manner consistent with JCC 18.15.150) from the
Commercial Forest 1 :80 designated land located immediately adjacent and to the
south.
41. MLA07-79 for APN 702113011 & APN 702113002 is submitted by Janet
Gillanders. The two adjoining parcels are located on Big Leaf Lane west of US
Highway 101 north of Quilcene. The applicant seeks to rezone both parcels from
RR 1:20 to RR 1:5.
42. With respect to MLA07-79, the Board unanimously concurs with and adopts as if
stated in full here the findings and conclusions in favor thereof of the Planning
Commission and the DCD Final Staff Report dated November 20,2007, and
8
November 26, 2007, respectively. As stated above in this document at No. 19, the
Planning Commission recommended to the Board a modification to this proposal
whereby in lieu of the applicant request to rezone from Rural Residential (RR) 1
dwelling unit per 20 acres (1 :20) to RR 1 :5, the property in question be "split-
zoned" using the Little Quilcene River as the boundary line, with the 12-acre area
east of the river rezoned RR 1: 10, and the 28-acre area west of the river remaining
RR 1 :20. The only condition of Board approval is that a Boundary Line
Adjustment (BLA) application be submitted by the applicant/landowner to
relocate the property boundary to match the river and the proposed zoning
boundary .
43. MLA07-90 for APN 902124002 and APN 902121002 (partition) is submitted by
Richard Broders and Broders Limited Family Partnership. The two adjoining
parcels are located on the west side of US Highway 101 on the west side of
Discovery Bay, and comprise approximately 160 acres. The applicant requests a
Mineral Resource Land Overlay on Commercial Forest 1 :80. The legal
description is
All of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter; the Northeast quarter
of the Southwest quarter and Government Lot 2 of Section 12, Township
29 North, Range 2 West, W.M.; together with the East 1490 feet of the
South 12 Southwest quarter of said Section 12; excepting therefrom: the
South 180 feet of the East 1490 feet of the South 12 of the Southwest
quarter of said Section 12, Township 29 North, Range 2 West, W.M.; all
lying in Jefferson County, State of Washington."
44. With respect to MLA07-90, the following conditions of approval are applied:
1. The proponent is to prepare and submit a habitat management plan with any
formal mining or stormwater application submitted to Jefferson County.
2. Prior to approval and operation of a surface mine in the Broders mineral
resource land overlay, the proponent shall submit and satisfy all requirements of
the Jefferson County Code (ICe) title 18 including, but not limited to:
9
a. Protection of critical areas per JCC 18.15.170 (6). Mining is
prohibited within regulated wetlands or their buffers. Mining is prohibited
in Fish and Wildlife Habitat areas or their buffers.
b. Submission of a drainage and erosion control plan, grading plan, and
aquifer recharge area report if applicable, which shall demonstrate that the
proposed activities will not cause degradation of groundwater or surface
waters.
3. The proponent shall satisfy all requirements of JCC 18.20.240 for mineral
extraction, mining, and reclamation including full compliance with the
Washington State Surface Mining Act (RCW 78.44).
4. The proponent shall satisfy all development standard requirements of JCC
18.30.
5. The proponent shall fulfill the requirements of the State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA) found at RCW 43.21C and WAC 197-11.
6. All activities within the MRL overlay shall be subject to the standards of the
latest edition of the Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for
Western Washington. Gravel mining operations shall, prior to approval and
operation, obtain from the Washington State Department of Ecology Water
Quality Program a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit for process water, stormwater and mine dewatering water discharges.
7. Mining shall be limited to a maximum depth often (10) feet above the seasonal
high water table as determined by the best available scientific data, and in
concurrence with the Department of Ecology.
8. At the point of Development Permit application, the proponent shall meet the
requirements of JCC 18.20.240 (2) (c) by dedication of buffer zones and other
precautionary measures as appropriate to protect adjoining lands, wildlife habitat
and scenic resources from adverse impacts.
10
45. MLA07-99 for APN 001081005 is submitted by Sharon McCarthy. The parcel is
located west of South Jacob Miller Road. The applicant seeks to rezone the parcel
from RR 1 :20 to RR 1 :5.
46. With respect to MLA07-99, the Board unanimously concurs with and adopts as if
stated in full here the findings and conclusions in favor thereof of the Planning
Commission and the DCD Staff Report and SEPA Addendum (September 5,
2007) which discuss this CP amendment, its potential cumulative impacts and its
environmental impacts, if any.
47. MLA07-100 for APN 001081001 is submitted by Sharon McCarthy. The parcel is
located east of South Jacob Miller Road. The applicant seeks to rezone the parcel
from RR 1 :20 to RR 1 :5.
48. With respect to MLA07 -100, the Board unanimously concurs with and adopts as if
stated in full here the findings and conclusions in favor thereof of the Planning
Commission and the DCD Staff Report and SEPA Addendum (September 5,
2007) which discuss this CP amendment, its potential cumulative impacts and its
environmental impacts, if any.
49. MLA07-104 is a suggested amendment developed by DCD on behalf of Jefferson
County and seeks to initiate the process and analyses necessary to designate up to
two sites located in east Jefferson County under the Industrial Land Bank (ILB)
provisions of the GMA (RCW 36.70A.367) in order to provide additional
employment opportunities for residents. As described in the DCD Staff Report
and SEPA Addendum of September 5, 2007, the suggested amendment is not
prepared for adoption at this time, and the Planning Commission concurred with
the staff recommendation that a final legislative decision on the proposal be
deferred to the 2008 CP amendment cycle.
11
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED as follows:
Section One: Under MLA07-70 [Tukey Investments LLC], the map of Comprehensive
Plan Land Use Designations is hereby amended to reflect that the parcel of real property
with APN 921182003, located on the west side of Oak Bay Road, immediately north of
the junction of Oak Bay and Old Oak Bay Roads, shall be given in its entirety an
underlying land use designation of Rural Residential 1 :5.
Section Two: Under MLA07-79 [Janet Gillanders], the map of Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Designations is hereby amended to reflect that the parcels of real property with
APN 702113011 & APN 702113002, located on Big Leaf Lane west of US Highway 101
north of Quilcene and comprising 40 acres, is hereby amended to reflect an underlying
land use designation of Rural Residential 1: 10 for the 12-acre area east of the Little
Quilcene River, while the 28-acre area west of the river retains an underlying land use
designation of Rural Residential 1 :20.
Section Three: Under MLA07-90 [Richard Broders & Broders Limited Family
Partnership], the map of Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations is hereby amended
to reflect that the parcel of real property with APN 902124002 and APN 902121002
(partition), located on the west side of US Highway 101 on the west side of Discovery
Bay, and comprising approximately 160 acres, shall have an underlying zoning
designation of Mineral Resource Land Overlay or "MRLO," with certain conditions
listed above placed on the applicants' utilization of that MRLO status.
Section Four: Under MLA07-99 [Sharon McCarthy], the map of Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Designations is hereby amended to reflect that the parcel of real property with
APN 001081005, located west of South Jacob Miller Road, shall be given in its entirety
an underlying zoning designation of Rural Residential 1 :5.
12
Section Five: Under MLA07-100 [Sharon McCarthy], the map of Comprehensive Plan
Land Use Designations is hereby amended to reflect that APN 001081001, located east of
South Jacob Miller Road, shall be given in its entirety an underlying zoning designation
of Rural Residential 1 :5.
Section Six: If any section of this Ordinance is deemed either non-compliant or invalid
pursuant to the Growth Management Act, then the development regulations and/or
underlying zoning designations applicable to that parcel or parcels prior to adoption of
the non-compliant or invalid section of this Ordinance shall be applicable to that parcel or
parcels.
Section Seven: If any section of this Ordinance is deemed either non-compliant or
invalid pursuant to the Growth Management Act, such a finding of non-compliance or
invalidity shall not nullify or invalidate any other section of this Ordinance.
Section Eight: The five maps reflecting the zoning changes are hereby incorporated. See
attachment: Map 1 - Tukey
Map 2 - Gillander
Map 3 - Broders
Map 4 - McCarthy
Map 5 - McCarthy
Section Nine: In consideration of the emergency situations of December 2007, and
within the overall public interest, the BoCC extended the decision date on these CP
amendments to January 14,2008 by Resolution No. 113-07. This Ordinance becomes
effective on the date it is executed.
13
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of January
, 2008.
,.#""",;"'''':''.. ''''-
, ,.- ~
~.. ~.. ...!J..,
~..s'" '. Af. .
"i:;1,~,~ j '(,
- ,.""" -j
'''-..a:\~.* --<',. ,
'i' 't- ;tl
J ~ ',i'!
, ~ ~ '!
J, .. ...
.., ~ .,.
. \';\'~., a;;, ..'i ~
If; .. ...k. tit..' ._. f....-,& "
· .~.r ._'__"~~ ...4
.'r ~.~ '-'/.'
~', ,/
, '1; (\" "'.'
JEFFERSON COUNTY
BOARD COMMISSIONERS
12/LtZ ---
David Sulliv \-
~~~/~
Deputy Clerk of the Board
Approved as to form:
r S) 08
il Pro ecuting Attorney
14
02-0128-08
Ordinance Number:
Map 1:
Map 2:
Map 3:
Map 4:
MapS:
Attachment A: Maps
MLA07 - 70 Tukey Investment, LLC
MLA07 -79 J. L. Gillanders
MLA07-90 Richard Broders and Broders Family Associates, LP
MLA07-99 S. McCarthy - West
MLA07-100 S. McCarthy - East
Map 1: MLA 07-70
Tukey Investment, LLC
Rezone RR 1 :20 to RR 1:5
!:iE-21OOi2ii
9621r..(Hti
921DtJall ~... ~H"
~21Q!30'9 9b030002t
..... ,,\\1 OAK RD
"
I, ...., ~ l:Kl'07:i009'" ... \~ 911013U2.Z
,..... , 'I..... '. 92101331!J, II.
-....."",....... -' . ....\ ~ ~. ' ' c
-'. :. ~2~(lrll>>o", 92: !)n,j)~ ~
. c"r'-> 9'2i'Gr.lwI 91 'WI JIj , 35
4}2107~"'5 ',;'t!" ~
92 ~Onlj26 - -:. ~ z Y.l1(lriOP
H . _~.. .~ _""'....~~. : \l2107JV'6 ~
, , ':12101 ~'2 ~ \
!P-1Or.'!(Vjb (;'. < \l21{)13J:l'~ \
(" - 9'l ~.w .Y.)...1(' '\
c , ~\
~; , -! 9 2:H~,"',m". ~9,~l'\, "
P ."',
'1 .Jf. '~ :~
, ,: .,..' " \
o ~111~~12 .~
\
~\
9J~ 1.~200" 921le....'l'(Ijl \
'!lP 1 :$2OJl.,
W"a.':flO:r' O..;lIi"'''~';'i~\
. '9i'1~2001 {O 9'2' le2007 ~\
.,.., Oit 92' ".9~l1 \'\
921 'e.2\.~ ~1' I"'''''''''''''' .
'., itt ~ 1alO.3a .....;:: .'
92 "~20 <:>
1o!2t\5.2Qj!l ~21 ltJ.:!"O'3
92' , 82O'Jti.
92~ ,,~'I.g~. ',~' 9211&..~')
'. ~!. , 520'1" 9'l' ,.:;2!):iJ
~,92' 1S2:(>>1)
Legend
I ;1 ~
I 9G2 ,'0011 1 I I '9!:iZ'/l!OOl(j I
GR!.WI 51 'IlS27OOO'1t.1
I
I 962fCm'ia I 9b21C(QSg
~~~: ~ I ~1~
I
I
I I
ItIlRi
~
Rural Residential 1 :5
Subject Parcel
Rural Residential 1 :20
Commercial Forest
Local Agriculture 1 :20
"
I
'i62!()OC61
~2~
o
~
e
.3..
I
I I
I" - /I ~m;;
I I ~lOO:~
?32lCOOSS j l-
I I ~ 9b27~-
l;.J
..J
- :i:
~
~.,.,COOOO ~
lJ:lil.:xxl€.1 4 '962/C((.A:i3
9621CIXlI52
~
2007 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Cycle. Map source: Jefferson County Central
Services GIS jMAP Parcel Map Viewer (http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/idms/mapserver.shtml).
Thematic presentation: Department of Community Development. Date: 01/23/08.
a a
~ ...... <:'!
Cii
-c ro ro ro (1)
'" ~ ~ E Ci
C Qi u..
C.l (1) (1) (1)
Q) Co " " " ro Cii
0.. "iij "iij "iij .~ (1)
0) (1) (1) (1) Ci
Q) 1:5 c::: c::: c::: (1) u..
(1) ro ro ro E ~
.....J E E
::l :; :; :; 0 ::l
Ul c::: c::: c::: 0 c:::
DilDDI
~
k,,~ ~
~.
~.
-~
'~
-,
~
..;-...
~.
e us .,0.,
$i
;Q ~'l
~ '!
......___ ,'t::
~
'"
<>
i1i
;l:
eo
c,
T
I
~
;;:/"'
~
eo
.~.....
'"
eo
~
~
e
,)i::-::=,~=::........
ff' '-'::;
....':::::..-=
.;,if,',
~
~
~
~I
~~
.~
~
~
~
~
- ~
:;j ::
_ El
/~--......... -
v"" "
v<C-.{< ~-
! ~ ~--
~~ ~
: ~
e :::
~
- --- -- - ------ -
~
~
~
~
0')
to-
I
to-
O
<3:
~
:E
en
S-
a>
"'C
C
CO
~
~~
<.9
/
,/
N .
c.....J
CI:S
:E-.i
cx:i
a
M
~
......
a
~ Qj
(1)-
3: CIl
(1)0
5-'
c
0.(1)
CIl E
~o.
- 0
(1)-
C.l (1)
... >
CIl (1)
0..0
0.. :>.
<t:='=
~ 5
"~ E
~ E
(9 0
",0
(1)_
C.l 0
.~ c
(1) (1)
Ul E
-t::
~ CIl
-0.
C (1)
<30
:>.c
C .Q
::l-
02
o C
C 3l
o (1)
'" ...
... 0.
Jg .>2
(1)-
-,CIl
.. E
(1) (1)
C.l.c:
:;1-
~-:..
o.E
CIl-
~~
cD Qi
() 2:
:>.(1)
o '"
_0.
C CIl
(1) E
ECil
" E
c"
(1) ._
ECil
<t: =!
c CIl
CIl 3:
0:: C
(1) 0
> ~
"iij Jg
C (1)
(1).~
.c: .
(1) 0
... C.l
c.'
~1
1"-"":-:
a.9-
a-
NE.
>-
ro
~ a a
> ~ ..... ~
0 ..... ..... ..... tl
ClJ ]! ]!
U ]! ClJ
"'0 ~ C C C 0
c 0 ClJ ClJ ClJ u..
Q) W "0 "0 "0 ro tl
ClJ '00 '00
Cl 0::: '00 .~ ~
ClJ ClJ ClJ
Q) ro 0::: 0::: 0::: ClJ 0
u..
.....J Qi ro ~ ~ E ro
c ~ E
~ :J :J 0 ~
0::: 0::: 0::: 0 0:::
I ~ I 0 ~ I
~~~,
"'.~
~ .' ."
a...
--.J
en
Q)
of-'
CO
(,)
o
en
en
<(
~
E
CO
LL
en
s....
Q)
-c~
o CO
s....-
CO CD
-c >
cO
CO Q)
en (,)
o s.... s....
en Q) :J
r-=. "'C 0
o 0 en
<c s.... Q)
...JCOn:::
:E-c-
s.... CO
.. CO s....
('f)..c Q)
g. (,) .c
:En:::~
($0-1
N~~
rs>~(}J
~
q~
~ ~ )\~
dSl,;g ~ ~ (~~8 8
~ 8 ,rv' ;N .1.8~ ~~a.:;;::~-_
~, '.... ,..,:il S!,j~"~~, ~ ~' ~;?;~'"
~~~~>J.'5.'JLio ,,.,IS- ~'J/j1:l3NIO~"'~~'5. ~
~, J ~~ ~~~,~*;;~~{~~g,.,j~;~,." .~'~ ~() ~
"~'_'....' ' ':(" 0 ,~...t t~,;' '., ..... " ~, ' ~
o :r ....1 '" . {o," ~l ;....
~ s: ' s?, :..
--r-g+~
I
~ I
~ II ~ I ~o
~I ~
i
~
~
~
..
~
---
--
~
~
g
~
~
--------
-
~
~
g
~
~
g
~
- ~
,~
~
'" 0
8 v
_ i!
~ ~
at
n
~ ~
.~~
1 ~
I
I
1
I ~ .
1-\ i \
---.."'--__. I 8 \
8 ---t-;:-+
~ S
~
I \' ! I ! \ !
'5. \ gig
, I \
_~-tl -~--L~- _8
;: ;:';: 1 ;;
s s, ~ I ~
8
~
~
g
"
'#
;;;
co
a
M
~
.....
a
~ Cl)
ClJ-
:: ro
ClJO
5.,.;
c
o.ClJ
ro E
:20.
- 0
ClJ-
U ClJ
~ >
ro ClJ
0..0
a.. >-
<(='=
:2 3
.~ E
~ E
<.9 0
wO
ClJ.....
U 0
'2: c
ClJ ClJ
C/) E
-t::
~ ro
-0.
c ClJ
<30
>-c
C .Q
:J-
019
o c
c ClJ
~ ~
~ 0.
Jgg
ClJ-
....,ro
.. E
ClJ ClJ
U.J::;
~1-
o
w"-:"
o.E
ro-
:2~
oj cri
u C:
>-ClJ
o w
_0.
c ro
ClJ E
Ecn
"0 E
f6:2
Ecn
<( :J
C ro
ro ::
0:: c
ClJ 0
> ~
'00 Jg
c ClJ
ClJ'_
.J::; .
~ 8
~~
0-..
",,--:--:
a.9-
a-
N,s
0 0
~ ~ ~
Ci5
en ~ Ql Ql
0 2
Qi ~ C u...
0 Ql Ql en :;
"'0 en "0 "0 0
'00 '00 '0 "g,
C 0.. Ql Ql m
t) 0::: 0::: <C
Q) E ~
Ql en ~ E
:0
0) :J :; :J 0 0 ~
Q) en 0::: 0::: 0 ....J
g
--I DDDQ~ 8
-~--
~
'll
s:
0::
0::
+"'" 0
CJ)+"",
Q)
O)S~
0)
· T"'"
~EO::
<eto::
i CO Q)
o c
.. u 0
6.~ N
m . Q)
:!:CJ)O::
I :~
I '!tI
8 '$
~ r
81 t
r $
I I"
'::';;;-O<l <l3111~~80J"f S
~-<..//- /..'
'// /
9 //.~.{,
~ /<(/ ~
~~~/, ~i
;.:;.;;//
~"
~
~.
s:
,
-!~
~
8: ""-,
rr-
~ r_~-o~ I
i t~~~~f
~i U'
-.....)1;..4 i ~
'',.:. /
/.
;~
'...
"S:
;/j
l'
""
~
'"
!
8
-::~-,} ~-
o ,1 ; ~1
~ ~,>-
'.~~"t ~.,..~ ~
f .;; 1: ;?' i5 ~
r'-8f?'i-~< 8,
~ ~~ 8 J_~~'- 8; .: ll) - ;p.
..~~~~ ,~z;".' 2~ ~ I ~~ '"
I -' 8 _ 2 ~l!:
r -'! ~~ 8 ~ ~
II' s ~ .., ~
o O'
8 ~
;;: 8
8'
8
8
~
8
8
'P~' ~';;~ ;~'"
""~..:..:>:L.-
8
B
8
~ ~ '" ~ ;j}:'
r ~
8: ~ s: 8:
'"
2
,~ i ~ :;:', '" ~ 8
~ <~ 8
81 ~ 4- ...-
8 1': 8 S 8 8 "
.t ~:
-f- t 8
:, t 8
L()
-'
i -
S
8
8
,~
'8
~
8
~
~,
8
T"'"
~'
~
S
~
'"
2
I
~
;;:
$
2
..
g
$
8__~,
8 co
~ 8
...' ~ .
..,
2,-
;;;
cS'
~ ~ ~
8 :'J 8
8f.81,8
(
_,I_..~
~
~
8
..
~..-
8
- -_.?,
;;;
8
~
~
8
~.
8
:~..:.;8 ~~.,o
~
~
8
"" ,.f;;""n... .,..
:'&
'I
'"'
t'l
3
8
~
8
'.
i;j
:'J
8
Si -.
0 ~
'" 8, <.
~ 8 ili
~ B
... ;,.of' ''''
;z '"
w ~
0
0
l' 8
~
:'J
1':
1:: '8
i:i ><
:'J :g
,~, 8
'f
,I a ~, ~
r
:8 S!,
8 r 8 8
,
,,- II
1
~
:'J
g
"
.
~
~
<~
l
~_. II
.~.
';,
-
:ll
'"
...;!--
'"
8
;:;
~
~
~
Qi
o
en
0..
0..'0
<C-
::2: <=
'- Ql
en E
-t
<:> ro
(/) 0.
Ql Q)
00
'1': i::
Ql 0
en:;:;
ro
roc
.l:: Ql
<= (/)
Ql Ql
Oc..
~o
c::;:;
:J ro
o E
OQl
<=.t:
01-
(/) .
/i)::=-
tt: E
Ql-
,.t:
(/)
Q) ~
o Ql
.... C:
:J Ql
o (/)
(/) 0.
o.ro
ro E
::2:--
(/)
'E
2"0
0:.:::
;>. (/) .
O:JCXl
-roe
<=;;:M
Q) 'N
E<=--
-g~o
E&$
<C .!!; ~
~8...J
a: ~. a3
Ql E
> 0.
"u; ::::: 0
<= c. Qi
Ql - >
.t:-Q)
~::So
c.....;>.
E~='=
o Ql <=
05E
r-- 0. E
o ro 0
~::2:0
g
,~
0 0
~ ~ ~
tl
]j CO Q) Q)
~ 0 .a
Qj c u.
() Q) Q) CO "3
""C CO "0 "0 ()
'00 '00 '(3 '-
C a. Q) Q) ~ Cl
tl 0: 0: <l:
Q) E ~
Q) co ~ E
:0
0> ::l ::; ::l 0 0
Q) (/) 0: 0: () --1
.....J DDDD~
1--
~
.h
o -~'ft.
8
~
s:
~.
:ii
,$
~
~
L!)
~
:g
~I
8
T"'"
et:
et:
.... 0
en....
CO
oWO
o N
'7 I T"'"
~.E'et:
<(Let:
:i CO Q)
o c
.. u 0
II) ~ N
Q.
co . Q)
:ECI)et:
~
~
~
,8'
~
~
~
8:
-
- --- - --
~
8:
~
g
8
~
l::
~ f
8
J
'"'
~
:g
8
~
~
...,
;.::'
3
8
~
8:
""~ w' 1:
f
&:
,
~
\1
or
'.
j
~ '" !~ '~ l ~ ,.., ~
o. ~, 1 ~
:3 2 ;g
8 8 8 g 8 8 8
L-- - -
~
i'l
8
8
'"
~'o
~ !~~I ~~
~~ ~
'':.:... ~
~ ~
~ s:
",jf-I~
'"
~
8
~
l<l
;g
8
r---
---
'"
8
8
8
~
~
~t;~;~~1<"""~ ;5.-
" 8
~
8
I .,
~ ....cjio..
it,
$
tf
';{
~;
~&o>'
g
~
8
I ~
1 ,~
, 8
1: --;-~, ~',!l>_,'~
ii' ;:~~4 ,~
't "i,r 2
:t' ~~, "'~~
(8' 8
;.,..:
,~
.,
~'
8'
~
~,
8
., ~4;
f .
'~ ; I ~
~.,. 8_ _:
&'
I :8
! {3
'"i'-
'"
~
.~,
8
~
'I
II
- fii
~ ~
8 Ig:
--__ --iL
I
II
I' -
IlL
II s:~
~
~
8
~
~
s
...
8
l
8
.,
;;
~ >-
8 ~ i<l
o ~ ~
o u C<
~ ~ 8
~I ;= l!!
8._'p;,! '" <:! N
'-., ~, :j::
~; 9 ,:'
.' ~ 8~ ~
878 '::: if.
. ~ ~
~ ~J
~
8
z
~
8
""
0 ;; ."
<l: ~ <,
~ ~
~ 8 8
>-
z '"
w ;;;
Q 8
0
J: 8
~
8
~
:g
8
~
;g
8
~
~
8
~
? 8
81]
--~
.
"
[
~l
i
~I
II
~~,
:i
~
~
;g
8
ex;
o
M
~
o
'- i:ri
Q)-
~~
>-E
c,Q)
~B.
Qj..Q
~ g;
ell Q)
0.0
~~
~ 5
,~ E
~ E
(9 0
Vl()
Q)....
() 0
'~ c
Q) Q)
(/) E
~~
cg.
<30
>.c
C ,2
SS
() 53
c Vl
o Q)
~ 0.
~ ,~
.!!;Cti
.. E
Q) Q)
().c
::;1-
o ,
Vl ~
g-g
~~
.cri
~ C:
~Q)
()~
- ell
53 E
Elil
"0 E
53:2
Elil
<l: =!
~ ~
a: c
~ ~
'oo~
53 ,!!!,
.c '
~ 8
!J
bE-
~E.
NOTICE OF ADOPTION BY THE
JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) for Jefferson County enacted
Ordinance #[replace with number] on January 28, 2008, thereby adopting five (5) Comprehensive Plan amendments
associated with the 2007 Comprehensive Plan amendment cycle; the decisions having been made on January 14, 2008,
following the schedule outlined in Resolution #113-07, signed on December 10, 2007. The Adoption Ordinance was
enacted during the regular Consent Agenda at 9:30 AM in the BOCC Chambers, Jefferson County Courthouse, 1821
Jefferson St., Port Townsend. Following are brief descriptions of each of the five amendments to the Comprehensive
Plan. Each case has a Master Land Use Application (MLA) file number for reference. Each of the amendments is a site-
specific amendment.
1. MLA07 -70; Tukey Investments LLC; west side of Oak Bay Road, immediately north of the junction of
Oak Bay and Old Oak Bay Roads; 20 acres (tax parcel number 921182003); RR 1 :20 to 1 :5.
2. MLA07-79; Janet Gillanders; Big Leaf Lane, west of US 101, north of Quilcene; 40 acres (tax parcel
numbers 702113011 & 702113002); RR 1 :20 to 1 :5.
3. MLA07-90; Richard Broders and Broders Family Associates, LP; west side of US 101 on the west side
of Discovery Bay; 396 acres (tax parcel numbers 902124002 & 902121002 (partition); Mineral
Resource Land Overlay on CF 1 :80.
4. MLA07-99; Sharon McCarthy; South Jacob Miller Road; 20 acres (tax parcel number 001081005);
west of South Jacob Miller Road; RR 1 :20 to RR 1 :5.
5. MLA07-100; Sharon McCarthy; South Jacob Miller Road; 20 acres (tax parcel number 001081001;
adjacent and to the west of Jacob Miller Road; RR 1 :20 to RR 1 :5.
Three Comprehensive Plan amendment applications were not adopted:
MLA07-93; Rayonier Forest Resources L.P. (represented by Terra Pointe Services, authorized agent of
property owner); Clearwater Road, west Jefferson County; 42.91 acres (tax parcel number 412182020);
RF 1:40 to RR 1:5.
MLA07-94; Rayonier Forest Resources L.P. (represented by Terra Pointe Services, authorized agent of
property owner); West of Oak Bay Road and north of Mats Mats Beach Road; approximately 120 acres
(tax parcel numbers 921322002 (partitioned) & 921321004); CF 1:80 to RR 1:20 and RF 1:40 to RR 1:10.
MLA07-96; Hill Timber and Bay Mountain Timber (Joseph D'Amico, authorized agent of property owner);
west of US 101 in S11, T29N, R2W W.M.; 40 acres (tax parcel numbers 902112001 & 902112004;
902111008 & 902114001; 902142002 & 902142003); RR 1 :20 to RF 1 :40.
One suggested amendment was carried over to the 2008 amendment cycle:
MLA07-104; Jefferson County; initiation of the process and analyses necessary to designate up to two sites
located in east Jefferson County under the Industrial Land Bank provisions of the GMA (RCW 36.70A.367) in
order to provide additional employment opportunities for county residents.
MLA06-87; Master Planned Resort application is enacted in a separate ordinance.
Availability ofInformation: Copies of the adopted ordinance are available at the Jefferson County Courthouse, 1821
Jefferson St., Port Townsend W A 98368, (360) 385-9100. A copy of the full text of the ordinance will be mailed out
upon request. Background information is available at the Dept. of Community Development, 621 Sheridan Street, Port
Townsend and on the DCD web pages: www.coJefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment. Contact Joel Peterson for more
information: (360) 379-4472 or joeterson@co.jefferson.wa.us .