HomeMy WebLinkAboutHMP 701191000 Part 2TABLE 3. LIST OF NATIVE PLANTS FOR
BUFFER MITIGATION AND ENHANCEMENT (212 Wampum Point)
Location
-S--p ec es
Scientific Name
Number
Size
A
Fra aria chileonsis
25
Coastal Strawberry
1 gallon
A _
Beach Sand S ur
mer ulama macrotheca
20
-._.
1 allan
A
Seaside Plantain
Plantago maritima
15
1 gallon
B
Tall Oregon Grape-
aquifolium
20
1 gallon
B _
Kinnikinnick,
_Mahonia
Arctosta h los uva-ursi
30
1 gallon
B _
Nootka Rose
Rosa nutkana
10
1 2allon
B
Western red cedar
Thun'a Licata
6
10
5 gallon
B�
Oceanspray T
Nolodiscus discolor
3 qatlon
C
77
Gramineae 5-10
Mixed Grasses
Pounds
• Area A includes salt and wind tolerant plants. Area B includes species found in
the vicinity of the Site. Area C is to be replanted with a grass seed mixture
following construction.
WW1562-EastQuilceneHMP.Tab3/081618/mas 30
Planting Area C will be a 12 foot area around the house addition,
wherever construction disturbance has occurred. This area will
include planting of grasses, with limited shrubs and groundcover to
avoid erosion in the construction area while still providing a use area
around the home.
Success of the Planting Plan depends on choosing species that are suitable to the
on -Site soil conditions, but that are hardy and capable of handling nutrient poor
soils, shading and some salt spray. The native vegetation selected for this
Mitigation and Habitat Management Plan were chosen for these reasons.
Soils on the Site are mostly sandy gravelly loams which are well drained. Normal
rainfall will quickly drain through these soils. Plants may require additional watering
during the first year in order to meet performance criteria. A simple drip irrigation
system would be the most effective method of accomplishing this.
The species, size and number of plants that will be used to revegetate these areas
is shown in Table 3. Plants will be placed in a semi -random fashion within the areas
indicated in Figure 6. Small trees will be placed on eight -foot centers (shore pine
and oceanspray) and shrubs will be planted on six-foot centers or less. Staggering
of plants, rather than planting in straight rows, will create a more natural appearing
configuration. Plants may be clustered by species in order to promote natural
reseeding.
Plants installed in the fall usually out -perform those installed in the late winter or
spring. Planting projects scheduled for early October to mid-December are
generally the most successful. The earlier plants go into the ground in the fall, the
more time they have to recover from transplant shock, adapt to the site, and
expand their roots systems before the growing season. They will require less water
and grow more vigorously than if they are planted in the spring. To increase the
potential for the planted species to survive, four inches of mulch should be placed
around the installed plants with the mulch two inches away from the stem of the
plants.
WW1 562-EastQuilcene. RPT/081618/mas 31
6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 CONCLUSIONS
The Property presently has an existing home, garage and existing
shed/outbuildings, all within the 150 foot buffer zone. The landowner intends to add
on to the existing residence with an 1,150 or 1,170 square foot addition as
approved by Jefferson County located on the southeast corner of the building. The
addition will be no closer to the OHWM than the home to the south of the Property.
The new addition will be placed roughly 60 feet from the OWHM.
Measures outlined in this Report will be enacted to mitigate construction on the Site
and incrementally improve habitat and vegetation in the nearshore area. Erosion
control measures will include a silt fence and other standard measures and will be
used during construction to minimize sheet and rill erosion.
A Planting Plan (Chapter 5.0) (See Figure 6 and Table 3) will be implemented to
provide additional vegetation adjacent to the shoreline, and in the construction zone
of the house. Also, any invasive, non-native plants which are present should be
removed from the buffer zone.
This Report and associated Habitat Management Plan meets the intent of
RCW36.70A.480 ensuring "No Net Loss of Shoreline Ecological Function" due to
the Mitigation proposed, and applicable Jefferson County Codes. It is also intended
to comply with requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) for requirements on floodplains and the Biological Opinion of the National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS).
6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS
This Report constitutes a Mitigation and Habitat Management Plan. A Planting Plan
has been included in this Report and we recommend that it be implemented on the
Site upon approval by the County. Benefits deriving from this Plan will only take
place if it is implemented by the Property owners and enforced by the County.
The silt fence should be emplaced at the western, southern and northern borders of
the home addition prior to construction and should be_left in place throughout
construction. Additional erosion controE m- ateri-a Is should be kept on Site to address
any erosion observed during construction.
The Planting Plan outlined in this Report should be implemented. The Plan should
be monitored according to the instructions outlined in this report and the
Contingency Plan implemented in the event that plant survival in the revegetated
areas fails below 90 percent.
WIN1562-EastQuiicene. RPT/0$161$/mas 32
Property owners should refrain from the use of pesticides or additional nutrients on
the Site and should introduce no contaminants within 100 feet of the OHWM. While
these measures will provide mitigation for additional construction and use of the
Site, the shoreline and marine critical areas may experience some continued
cumulative impacts as a result of the narrow size of the buffers and limited filtering
capacity of the soils in this area.
VINV1562-EastQuilcene.RPT/081618/mas 33
7.0 REFERENCES
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2013. Floodplain Habitat
Assessment and Mitigation — Regional Guidance for the Puget Sound Basin.
FEMA Region 10. Bothell, Washington.
Google Earth. 2018. Online mapping software.
Imagery date July 30, 2017. Europa Technologies.
Hitchcock, C.L. and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University
of Washington Press. Seattle, Washington.
Jefferson County. 2018a. Online mapping database. Port Townsend, Washington.
Jefferson County 2018b. Jefferson County Critical Areas Code (JCC 18.22). Port
Townsend, Washington.
Jefferson County. 2018c. Jefferson County Shorelines Management Program.
JCC 18.25. Port Townsend, Washington.
Lyons, C.P. 1997. Wildflowers of Washin ton. Lone Pine Publishing. Renton,
Washington.
Mayer, P.M., S.K. Reynolds, and T.J. Canfield. 2005. Riparian Buffer Width
Vegetative Cover, and Nitrogen Removal Effectiveness: A Review of Current
Science and Regulations. Cincinnati, Ohio. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency.
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2018. NMFS Website.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2018. Fisheries West
Coast Req ion Website, http://westcoast.fiisheries.noaa.gov.
Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). 2018. Web Soil Survey.
hftp://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
Pojar, J. and A. MacKinnon. 1994 (reprinted 2004). Plants of the Pacific Northwest
Coast. Lone Pine Publishing Company. Redmond, Washington.
Revised Code of Washington. 2018, RCW36.70A.480. Shoreline of the State.
hftp://apps/leg.wa.gov/rcw/defauIt.aspix?cfte=3670A.480.
WW1562-EastQuilcene.RPT/081618/mas 34
Taylor, R. 1995. Northwest Weeds. Mountain Press Publishing Company
Missoula Montana.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2018. Website: www fvvs qov.
Washington Department of Ecology (DOE). 2014. Rating System for Wetlands in
Western Washington. Olympia, Washington.
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 2018. Priority Habitats and
Species (PHS) List.
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). 2005. Status Report for the
Mazama Pocket Gop her, -Streaked Horned Lark and Taylor's Checkerspot.
Olympia, Washington.
Wenger, S. 1999. A Review of the Scientific Literature on Riparian Suffer Width
Extent and Vegetation. Athens, Georgia, Institute of Ecology, University of
Georgia.
Zenovic and Associates (Zenovic) 2018. Unpublished maps and personal
communications with Mr. Tracy Cudgel, Zenovic and Associates. Port
Angeles, Washington.
WWI 562-EastQuilcene.RPT/081618/mas 35
APPENDICES
WW1 562-EastQuilcene_RPT/081618/mas 36
APPENDIX A
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
WW1562-WampumHMP,APPA/062818/mas A-1
r
1) Photograph showing existing residence, with proposed addition area at
back (east side) of residence (away from Quilcene Bay).
2) Gate for 212 Wampum Point Road looking south at neighboring residential
properties.
WW1562-WampumHMP.APPA1062818/mas A-2
3 View of existing residence looking north at Quilcene Bay.
o r
,— s"'�,T,�`T``Yt' ..P - n.- fir• r
4) Seawall and beach along west side of the property at 212 Wampum Point
Road.
WW1562-WampumHMP.APPA/062818/mas A-3
5)
Small Inlet off of Quilcene Bay at North end of 212 Wampum Point Road
property.
6) Estuarine wetland on north end of property.
WW1562-WampumHMP.APPA/062818/mas A-4