Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutM120202COW __fir '014 ti `1w NO�O, District No. 1 Commissioner: Dan Titterness District No. 2 Commissioner: Glen Huntingford District No. 3 Commissioner: Richard Wojt County Administrator: David Goldsmith Clerk of the Board: Lorna Delaney MINUTES Week of December 2, 2002 The meeting was called to order by Chairman Richard Wojt. Commissioner Titterness was present. Commissioner Glen Huntingford was not present. Advisory Board Appointment: Commissioner Titterness moved to appoint Vanessa Brower to serve on the Housing Authority Board. Chairman Wojt seconded the motion which carried. Her term will expire on July 7, 2007. COUNTYADMINISTRA TOR BRIEFING SESSION. County Administrator David Goldsmith reported: • The invitations were sent out for the County's Sesquicentennial Open House on December 13 from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. The Courthouse lighting is scheduled for 5:30 p.m. • He met with the East Jefferson Rotary Club and the Parks and Recreation Department to discuss the pavilion project at H.J. Carroll Park. Construction will begin next spring. The East Jefferson Rotary wants to enlist the help of the other Rotary Clubs in the area for volunteer labor to keep costs down. • A situation has come up regarding a recently purchased structure in Irondale that did not go through the permit process when it was remodeled into a residence. The County is working with the new owners to bring the structure up to standards. • Several Elected Officials have suggested that the Board allow the majority of the employees to leave early on Christmas eve or close the Courthouse to the public from noon to 5 p.m. that day. Employees who choose to leave early would take vacation, comp time, or time off without pay. • He is meeting with the consultants on the fiber optics project this week. • The bond for the construction of the Sheriff s Administration/EOC/Dispatch Facility and the Castle Hill retrofit will not be issued until January because the timing will be better after the new year. The Courthouse clock tower project may be added to the bond. Page 1 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of December 2, 2002 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: The following comments were made: a resident expressed continued concerns about the high cost of living in Jefferson County and offered a suggestion regarding affordable housing; a new organization called MOCAA II (Make Our City Affordable and Accountable) has been formed and they plan to focus on 3 issues: 1) property taxes based on working class wages, 2) holding politicians accountable and, 3) researching citizen action groups to make sure they are registered with the State and they have records of where they get their money and technical advice; because of GMA and Smart Growth, Washington and Oregon have more people living in poverty than any other state; and the letter regarding the Quilcene well was sent to Congressman Dicks. APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE CONSENT AGENDA: Commissioner Titterness moved to delete Item #8 and to approved the balance of the items as presented. Chairman Wojt seconded the motion which carried. 1. ORDINANCE NO. 12-1202-02 re: Establishing a No Shoot Area in Brinnon to be Known as Olympic Canal Tracts No Shooting Zone 2. RESOLUTION NO. 72-02 re: Declaring the Results of the Election to Expand the Boundaries of Parks & Recreation District #1 to Include Voting Precinct #206 (Thorndyke) 3. RESOLUTION NO. 73-02 re: Providing a Positive Cash Balance for Newly Created Funds Established in the 2003 Budget; Five (5) Special Revenue Funds Moved Out of the General Fund: Cooperative Extension; Animal Services; Parks and Recreation; Community Development; and Natural Resources 4. RESOLUTION NO. 74-02 re: Providing a Positive Cash Balance for the Water Pollution Control Loan Fund 5. RESOLUTION NO. 75-02 re: HEARING NOTICE; Proposed Budget Appropriations/Extensions; Various County Funds; Hearing Scheduled for Monday, December 16, 2002 at 10:05 a.m. in the Commissioners Chambers 6. AGREEMENT, Amendment No. 1 re: Employment Services as County Administrator; David Goldsmith 7. AGREEMENT, Amendment No. 9 re: Consolidated Contract for 2001-2002; Jefferson County Health and Human Services; Washington State Department of Health 8. DELETED AGREEMENT re: Professional Services; Assessment of Feasibility of Initiating an Oral Health Program in July 2003; Jefferson County Health and Human Services; Cynthia S. Newman (Approved later in the minutes.) 9. AGREEMENT re: Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grant for South County Shuttle/Transportation Program; Jefferson County Juvenile Services; Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, Juvenile Rehabilitation Administration, Division of Community Programs 10. AGREEMENT re: Reimbursable Work to Chip Seal Garten Road; Jefferson County Public Works; Robert Garten 11. Grant Application re: Duckabush Road Culvert Replacement, Project No. CR1623; Jefferson County Public Works; USDA Forest Service 12. Notice of Cancellation of Board of County Commissioners Meeting; Monday, December 23, 2002 Page 2 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of December 2, 2002 HEARING re: I % Property Tax Increases for County General Fund, County Roads and Conservation Futures Fund: Chairman Wojt reported that the Board concurred on the 1% increase during the 2003 Budget hearings and deliberations. David Goldsmith explained that there were additional discussions about creating a separate emergency fund for declared emergencies. He suggested that the money expected from a lawsuit settlement can be used as the startup for this fund. Using banked capacity from the Road Fund to set up this emergency fund was also discussed. Commissioner Titterness agreed that using the lawsuit settlement for the emergency fund is an option, however, he stated that he doesn't support taxing people in advance for an emergency that may or may not occur. He feels that 1% is an appropriate increase for the Road Fund in 2003. The Chair opened the public hearing. Hearing no comments for or against the tax increase, the Chair closed the public hearing. County Assessor Jack Westerman reported that currently there is $500,000 in banked capacity in the Current Expense Fund and $227,000 in the Road Fund. If the County doesn't use banked capacity previously created, it can be used in the future. He cautioned that this is currently being debated and legislation could be introduced to change this. There was a discussion about creating a separate levy for the emergency fund. Chairman Wojt and Commissioner Titterness agreed to wait until Commissioner Huntingford returns on December 9 to discuss using banked capacity for the Road Fund. Road Vacation Petition; Willow Street; David Guettinger, Petitioner: Wendy Ward, Public Works Department, explained that the County Engineer and the Hearing Examiner have submitted reports that this road vacation be denied. The Petitioner hasn't presented any new evidence that would change the recommendations. Commissioner Titterness moved to accept the recommendations from the County Engineer and Hearing Examiner to deny the request to vacate that portion of Willow Street. Chairman Wojt seconded the motion which carried. Professional Services; Assessment of Feasibility of Initiating an Oral Health Program in July 2003; Jefferson County Health and Human Services; Cynthia S. Newman: (See Item #8 on the Consent Agenda.) Jean Baldwin, Director of Community Health, clarified that county health departments are responsible for providing dental services at a minimal level. The Health Department contracts and supervises these services and they are not related to programs run by any other organization. Commissioner Titterness moved to approve the contract with Cynthia Newman as presented. Chairman Wojt seconded the motion which carried. Page 3 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of December 2, 2002 Jean Baldwin, Director of Nursing re: Family Resource Grant: Jean Baldwin introduced Yuko Umeda and Carol Hardy, nurses whose efforts have created a very successful Maternal/Child Health Program. She reviewed a list of several support services including intensive home visits for first time moms. The program focuses on the client following her heart's desire to become a good mom. The visits can help create an early turnaround in high risk families and they have seen positive impacts in the reduction of family violence, mental health problems, and substance abuse. Commissioner Titterness asked how much of the funding for the program comes from the County? Jean Baldwin answered that there is no County funding going into the Maternal/Child Health Program. The Juvenile Justice Grant is 3 years at $80,000 and pays for the home visits. The remainder is paid for by a Maternal/Child Health grant and Medicaid matches. The WIC program's budget is $120,000 and 40% of it is funded by the County. The meeting was recessed at the close of scheduled business and reconvened at the Jefferson County Fairgrounds at 6:00 p.m. for the following hearing. All three Board members were present. HEARING re: Comprehensive Plan Amendment; MLA 02-235 and ZONO2-0049, Fred Hill Shine Quarry: Chairman Wojt called the public hearing to order at the Oscar Erickson Building at the Fairgrounds. There were approximately 470 interested citizens present. Director of Community Development Al Scalf explained that Fred Hill Materials' original Comprehensive Plan amendment application consisted of 6,240 acres. This was modified to 690 acres by the Planning Commission and staff. The acreage is currently designated as forestland of long term commercial significance. The Planning Commission's recommendation was a 690 acre MRL in addition to the existing 121 acre MRL at the 144 acre Shine Pit hub. The total amount of acreage in the MRL would be 811 acres. The Planning Commission's recommendation and the Staff recommendation is available in the final supplemental EIS dated November 25, 2002. Staff has prepared a handout for the hearing that outlines the process to date on the Fred Hill Materials, Inc. proposals for the Shine-Thorndyke area. Chairman Wojt stated that the applicant and the opponent will each be given 12 '/z minutes for their presentation. James Tracey, Attorney for Fred Hill Materials, pointed out that the proposed MRL designation does not contain any critical areas because they do not intend to compromise any of these areas. An application for any activity within the MRL will require a complete environmental review. This proposal is consistent with GMA, the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, and the Jefferson County Unfied Development Code. The County requires an MRL designation in any area where mining activity is to take place. Fred Hill Materials wants to expand their operation for commercial reasons, resource reasons, environmental reasons, and impact reasons. Page 4 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of December 2, 2002 He reiterated that an MRL designation is a policy decision and a separate process is used for any development application. An open public process is required when a development application is submitted. Facts and evidence must be considered and a record must be created. Any decision can be appealed. Fred Hill Materials has not submitted a development application. The MRL designation buffers residential development from mining activity just as a forestland designation buffers residential development near commercial forestland. Throughout this process the opposition has made false charges and given out misinformation. He asked the Commissioners to look at the real facts and to approve the Planning Commission's recommendation on the MRL designation. Larry Mayes, Hood Canal Coalition, submitted and read his comments. (See permanent record.) Mickey Gendler, Attorney for Hood Canal Coalition, stated that he will be submitting a letter that outlines the organization's concerns. The Commissioners need to say no to this Comprehensive Plan amendment. The property that Fred Hill Materials wants to protect as resource land is already protected by a commercial forestland designation. Reducing the number of acres for the MRL designation from 6,240 to 690 is not a compromise. Representatives from Fred Hill Materials have tried to prevent citizens from speaking out against the project. The Planning Commission's conditions appear to relate to the Pit to Pier Project, rather than an MRL designation. The condition requiring Fred Hill Materials to reimburse the County for tax revenue lost to sales outside of the County is not enforceable. The other condition about restricting barge traffic is under the sole jurisdiction of the National Coast Guard. The Chair opened the hearing for public comment. Paula Mackrow, Port Townsend, stated that North Olympic Salmon Coalition submitted a letter to the Planning Commission requesting that specific information be added to the general file on the proposed mineral land overlay. This included a complete watershed assessment to address the impacts to the aquifer. The Shine watershed has a very productive Coho population and there is documentation of some Puget Sound Chinook use of the estuary. Any activity upstream can impact the marine watershed. Fred Hill Materials has excluded all the critical areas in the MRL designation, but even if they have 300 foot buffers around these areas, digging between them will have an impact. Jim Kelety, Port Townsend, stated that he believes the MRL designation is about the Pit to Pier project. Reclamation is not restoration. This is about building a pier and barging materials and destroying the shoreline habitat. Once this happens, the shoreline will never be restored. Page 5 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of December 2, 2002 Kathy Larkin, Port Ludlow, explained that she has been a licensed real estate agent for 18 years. When people develop shoreline property or wetland areas, they are required to follow very stringent regulations to protect the environment. The same standards need to apply to Fred Hill Materials. People see the scar on the hillside when they come across the Hood Canal Bridge and hear all the controversy. This doesn't just affect real estate sales in the Shine area, but also sales throughout Jefferson County. John Day, Seabeck, has raised shellfish in Seabeck for about 20 years and opposes the gravel operation. Hood Canal is an isolated body of water without much exchange of ocean water. There has to be a way to protect shell fish and native vegetation in the canal from micro-organisms brought in through ballast water from boats. Stacey Thompson, Chimacum, stated that the value of houses in the Shine area will decrease and people will have to spend more time waiting for the Hood Canal Bridge to open and close. It would be a serious transportation disaster for the Olympic Peninsula if a barge hits and damages the bridge. Duane Johnson, Allyn, represents a union local in Port Gamble that supports the MRL designation. Most of the workers in the union are hunters and fishermen and wouldn't support this if they thought it would damage Hood Canal or Puget Sound. This application represents good union jobs, it is a clean business, and it will bring revenue into the surrounding counties. Jeff Hilliard, Sequim, stated that this will have an economic impact on the entire Olympic Peninsula. Michael Forbes, Poulsbo, stated that he supports this project. Washington State's economy is suffering and he can't see turning down something that will improve the economy in local communities. The opposition to Fred Hill is exaggerated and there are a lot of threats being made. There are laws and regulations to protect the environment and there will always be risks. Kelly Brandon, Port Ludlow, submitted and read his comments. (See permanent record.) Ashley Rowan, Port Hadlock, stated that she is very environmentally conscious but she also supports the Fred Hill Materials MRL designation because Jefferson County needs gravel for roads. This issue is very controversial and it is important to look at the facts. This will help improve the County's economy. Todd McGuire, Port Ludlow, Planning Commission Member, submitted and read his comments. (See permanent record.) Natalia Jackson, Port Hadlock, stated that she worships the earth and there is only so much of the natural environment left. She supports the Fred Hill MRL because it benefits the majority of citizens who drive cars on roads made from gravel, and use it for foundations and septic systems. Fred Hill Materials is working with the public and is conscious about being environmentally responsible. There is the need in Jefferson County for family wage jobs with good benefits so that young families can live here. Page 6 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of December 2, 2002 James Smith, Seattle, explained that he owns property in Jefferson County, is a commercial fisherman, and is working on a shellfish project. His concerns with the Fred Hill Materials MRL designation is more aesthetic than anything. He spends a lot of time on the beach where the pier for the Pit to Pier Project would be located. Hood Canal is not a pond, and when the weather gets bad, a barge loaded with rocks could do a lot of damage to the bridge which is an important link to the Olympic Peninsula. Curt Thomson, Port Ludlow, Bridgehaven Water Commissioner, explained that they operate two 400 foot wells that serve 180 hookups in and adjacent to the Bridgehaven Plat. Hooking up to a water system is better than drilling individual wells. Currently, they are doing capital improvement planning to increase the number of hookups to 300 or more. They are concerned about any activity that could jeopardize the aquifer because they can't risk an accident. There have been conflicting geological reports about the layers on top of the aquifer and more research is needed. Property sales in the area have already begun to decline. Mark Kulhman, Poulsbo, stated that he is a civil engineer for Fred Hill Materials. He explained that Fred Hill Materials could mine this property in 10 acre increments and not have to go through the MRL process. The level of environmental review is a much higher standard because of an MRL designation. He listed the Federal, State and local environmental reviews that are required. Groundwater studies regarding the aquifer are already part of the record. Kevin Smith, Quilcene, stated that he moved here from Colorado and lives in a rural area where he can raise horses. He came here for the quality of life. He works for Fred Hill Materials and they are one of the best companies he has worked for. A lot of people live in buses and campers without running water or septic systems and the County might want to look at cleaning that up. Hans Daubenberger, Port Townsend, stated that he is opposed to the project. On the map there are a large number of areas with sensitive habitat such as wetlands. What will happen to the water in those areas if large holes are dug around them? If the project includes more trucks using the Hood Canal Bridge, it could be economically devastating to the area. Nancy Dorgan, Port Townsend, pointed out that she has done a lot of research and has submitted several comments to the County opposing this designation. On a visit to the proposed site with the County Commissioners, they were shown a planted area where reclamation was begun. She is concerned about a reclamation plan that involves planting trees that will have commercial value. Janet Bonds, Port Ludlow, representing the Hood Canal Coalition, read and submitted a petition signed by 3,005 people who are opposed to the Pit to Pier Project. (See permanent record.) Page 7 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of December 2, 2002 Commissioner Huntingford noted that the Board has received hundreds of e-mails regarding Fred Hill Materials and their Comprehensive Plan amendment. They understand the concerns about damage to the bridge and possible pollution to Hood Canal. He thinks that everyone believes in due process. A constituent recently sent him an e-mail asking him to turn down the project because of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. His response was that the Board will look at the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the laws of the Washington State, and Jefferson County's ordinances and they will do their best to listen to everyone and treat them fairly. The Board has been gathering as much information as they can on all aspects of the proposal. Lisa Wright, Poulsbo, stated that she has lived on Hood Canal in Kitsap County for fourteen years. People need to take a lesson from what has happened in Southern California and not ruin the environment in the name of creating jobs. It's not too late for Washington. She quoted a letter written by her mother-in-law, "As a former property owner along the Hood Canal, I was shocked to hear about the Pit to Pier Project. I just couldn't believe that any Planning Commission could allow this type of commerce to emerge in such a pristine area. Is it possible that the people living nearby, or the general public does not comprehend the devastation that will result from this project? Even if you're not interested in the beautiful treelined water that will be destroyed, what about the displacement of wildlife and the disruption of the shoreline communities? The additional closing of the Hood Canal Bridge for running barges through should be enough for the environment conscious. What tourist or resident is going to accept unscheduled bridge closing and how much will Jefferson County businesses be affected? Most materials mined from this acreage will be shipped overseas and even if this does bring in more revenue for the State and the County, at what cost to you? It certainly won't reduce your taxes, it will probably devaluate your property. The big picture will tell me that if you don't stop developing now, it will be giving into big money again. Why do they call themselves "land developers, construction companies, political planners? They have to know what you are giving up. So many people commuting from cities .... look at the clean waters and the uncommercialized setting of the Olympic Peninsula and surrounding areas as an escape from danger. Please don't change that. I love this beautiful area. I hope that Kitsap County and Jefferson County will wake up, see what they will be trading to line someone else's pocket. Please don't pave our parking lots with our trees." Elizabeth Galeles, Port Ludlow, stated that she lives on Hood Canal just south of the development. This isn't about jobs or the environment. This is where people who have joined the Hood Canal Coalition live and play. For Fred Hill Materials, it's money. Most of the people that have spoken in support of the project have been from other communities in Jefferson County. The people that live in this area believe that this is a very bad project. Lars Sikes, stated that he lives on Hood Canal where they plan to put the pier. He submitted and read excerpts of his letter. (See permanent record.) Marie Hebert, Kingston, Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribal Council, submitted and read excerpts from their letter. (See permanent record.) Page 8 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of December 2, 2002 Donna Fabian, Port Ludlow, read a portion of a letter dated December 3, 2002 from the Cascade Chapter of the Sierra Club. (See permanent record.) John Fabian, Port Ludlow, Hood Canal Coalition submitted and read excerpts from his letter. (See permanent record.) Jeff Hathaway, Port Ludlow, stated that he supports the MRL designation. Fred Hill Materials is a good company and they care about the environment. Bill Matchett, Seabeck, Hood Canal Environmental Council, submitted and read excerpts from their letter. (See permanent record.) Rod Mash, Port Ludlow, stated that if the Shoreline Master Plan was in place today, there would be no Pit to Pier Project. He asked the Board to adjust their priorities and work on the Shoreline Master Plan first. Rod Barbee, Port Ludlow, stated that he is a professional nature photographer. This area is high on the list for many photographers because it is a very special place. The opposition to this project is more than just NIMBYism. It is about the view from our homes. The County needs gravel as a resource, but not at the high environmental risk to Hood Canal. What about possible damage to the bridge and the economic livelihood of Jefferson County? This would set a precedent for other businesses to come in and do the same thing. Are 30 jobs and some tax revenue worth ruining the Hood Canal ecosystem? Ron Sikes, Admiralty Audubon Chapter, stated that their concern is that if the Commissioners approve the MRL designation, they are approving the Pit to Pier Project also. All of the impacts on the environment from the entire project need to be evaluated before the designation is approved. Dick Keithahn, South Point Road, submitted and read his comments. (See permanent record.) Gabe Ornelas, Port Townsend, Vice Chairman of the Jefferson County Democratic Party, submitted and read the comments from the organization. (See permanent record.) John Topel, Port Ludlow, stated that he grew up on Hood Canal and he feels that it is a great resource for adjacent counties, the State of Washington and the world. Jefferson County needs economic development, but development brings ecologic damage. There needs to be a compromise. Thirty jobs is probably a high estimate. Is it worth putting Hood Canal at risk? There doesn't seem to be any advantage for Jefferson County to take such a risk at this time. Michelle Sandoval, Port Townsend, asked the Commissioners to think about their vision for the future of Jefferson County. Why would anyone want to make Jefferson County into some other place? Our strength is in our difference and saying no to big business. Jefferson County is unique and beautiful. In the future, the Commissioners success will be measured by what they have allowed to remain unchanged rather than what Page 9 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of December 2, 2002 they have created. It is important to support the Comprehensive Plan and follow the process, but the Plan requires protection of natural resources for a 20 year planning process. This gravel pit project will probably last much longer. Gloria Brom, Port Townsend, stated that when she first came to Jefferson County, she saw the Milky Way for the first time since she was a child because there was no light pollution. She moved here from California to recover from post traumatic stress syndrome caused by the L.A. riots. She recovered by letting nature take care of her. Nature will take care of us, if we take care of nature. The Pit to Pier Project will damage the environment. They already say the conveyor belt is noisy, can you imagine what rocks falling and hitting the barge will sound like echoing over the water? Ron Nelson, Port Ludlow, read a letter from his neighbor, Phillip Hanson. "In ancient Greece, there was a group of itinerant public speakers called the Cepheus. They specialized in rhetoric and for a fee they would teach you how to win an argument even when your position was much weaker than your opponent. The Cepheus were talented, but they had nothing on the modern spin employed by Fred Hill Materials. 1) The Fred Hill Material's spin says that Fred Hill Materials anticipates that there will be 30 new jobs and that the bridge will be open "x" number of times per month and that the barges and ships won't destroy the bridge and the environment will be protected and on and on. Well, every new year, I anticipate that I will really exercise every day and floss my teeth and rotate my tires. The truth is that anticipations are not assurances and good intentions by themselves are meaningless. 2) The Fred Hill Spinmiesters say that Fred Hill Materials is out for the little guy. Working hard to generate those 30 jobs. They try to portray opponents as a bunch of luxury car driving, Chardonnay sipping, Rolex wearing snobs. The truth is that the opponents of the strip mining come from all income groups, we are white collar, blue collar, no collar and ring around the collar. Moreover, if Fred Hill Materials can automate the strip mine and do it without hiring a single worker, they would do it in a heartbeat. It borders on the obscene that Fred Hill spinners pretend that they are looking out for the little guy when their main objective is to make some wealthy Kitsap County residents fabulously wealthy. 3) The spinners try to imply that the citizens of Jefferson County are divided on the issue; but Fred Hill Materials has had to buy petition gatherers and any brand of group support for the project. Citizens of Jefferson County are against this proposal. To put it bluntly, anyone who tries to portray otherwise, is simply dishonest. 4) The spinners say the opponents are NIMBYs; but this charge is a misrepresentation of reality. The truth is that the opposition to this expanding strip mine comes from all over the County. Only a very small percentage of opponents live close enough to see or hear the Pit to Pier Project. It's not NIMBY when someone who lives in Port Hadlock is worried about getting across the bridge to his or her job in Poulsbo. It's not NIMBY when you are a small source related business in Port Townsend who is worried about losing most of it's customers when the bridge is knocked down by a gravel ship or barge. It's not NIMBY when somebody in Coyle is worried that the crabbing will be ruined when one of the ocean going ships has an oil spill. Dale O'Brien, Port Hadlock, submitted and read her comments. (See permanent record.) Page 10 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of December 2, 2002 Don Young, stated that his wife's grandfather was a King County Commissioner in the early 1960's. He is remembered as a Commissioner when the World's Fair was in Seattle. He asked how people will remember the current Commissioners? Would they want their names on the Fred Hill mining site? He doesn't think that the Commissioners have done anything to keep this from happening. He hopes they do the right thing this time. Ken Ackerman, Quilcene, stated that there are a lot of elderly folks at this meeting, but not too many young kids. Since logging went down in Quilcene, there are a lot of unemployed people with young kids. People badmouthed him for years about being a logger, but now if they have a tree that is going to fall on their house, they call him to take it down. He has a 20 year old son in college who wants to be a scientist for NASA. His other son is 18 and wants to work at a rock quarry. Not everyone is the same. As far as the Hood Canal Bridge, much bigger log rafts used to take timber out of Hood Canal in all kinds of weather and he doesn't know of any incident when the bridge was damaged. Duffy Nightingale, Port Townsend, asked the Commissioners to vote against the MRL designation. This project does not benefit Jefferson County. These resources cannot be replaced. The Pit to Pier Project will ruin the environment, decrease property values, and cause traffic congestion. It also sets a precedent and other companies will want to do the same. Puget Sound is ruined, don't do the same to Hood Canal. Let Fred Hill keep operating, but don't let them expand. The only people who will benefit are the owners of Fred Hill. The potential for damage to the bridge and environment and loss of fishing jobs because of increased marine traffic and the proposed pier is too great. Diminishing resources need to be used wisely. Fred Hill Materials is in compliance with the Department of Natural Resources regulations concerning environmental reclamation, but he is not impressed with what they have accomplished. Put the MRL designation on hold to allow further investigation regarding the consequences and to allow Fred Hill to show what they will really do to restore the environment. He appreciates Fred Hill Materials and all that they have done for the County. This is not NIMBY, it just isn't a good plan for any county. Barbara Nightingale, representing Wild Olympic Salmon, submitted and read the organization's comments. (See permanent record.) Unidentified Man, Bridgehaven, stated that he is concerned about the aquifer and the marine environment. He also is concerned about potential damage to the bridge and transportation problems that it could cause especially for the school districts and sports programs. Patricia Floyd, Port Hadlock, stated that she is a member of the Inland Boatman's Union and works for the Washington State Ferries. Additional openings of the Hood Canal Bridge will create problems for people that work on the other side. She asked that the Board postpone their decision and hire an independent consultant to review the proposal. Page 11 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of December 2, 2002 Lois Lund, Port Townsend, said that she has lived in many beautiful areas of the country. In a lot of places the environment has been destroyed by development and it cannot be restored. She is a nurse and she has seen disease go from one system to another. Things have to be looked at as a whole. She is impressed by the spirit of the community to come together. Duane Davis, Port Townsend, stated that his family came to Lake Leland in 1951 and he has seen changes in Jefferson County over the past 50 years. He moved away, but came back to raise his children here. This is a special part of the country with a rich diversity of life. The whole project is disturbing because of its size and scale. He is in the construction industry and uses concrete, but it is important to be willing to preserve the very fragile ecosystem. At a Planning Commission meeting he attended there was no public comment allowed. He heard the Chairman make a comment about passing the item on the agenda and getting it over with. Doug Bush, Poulsbo, stated that he is the Executive Officer of Teamsters Local 589 and they are in support of the Fred Hill Materials' MRL designation. When he became a Union Representative in 1977, he met Fred Hill whose philosophy was to run his best equipment, take care of that equipment, train his people, and run a safe operation. That philosophy still exits today in the company. If the MRL designation is approved, he believes that any project they do will be a good, safe operation. Kathy Fletcher, representing People for Puget Sound, stated that the environment gets damaged little by little. She urged the Commissioners to look at the big picture. The MRL designation is a separate issue from the Pit to Pier Project. The gravel to restore Puget Sound does not need to come from this site. The Commissioners should not allow a new mineral resource overlay area until a fully objective and public process is completed. Karen Best, Port Ludlow, submitted and read her comments. (See permanent record.) Ezra Eickmeyer, Irondale, pointed out that waterfront homes built on Hood Canal degrade the environment. Some of the species in Hood Canal are dying out, but it is partly because of people's septic systems and the fertilizer they use on their lawns. The next biggest cause of water degradation on Hood Canal is runoff from the bridge. Everyone is responsible for gravel consumption. Regarding the petition supporting the MRL, once it was clear that this amendment was not about strip mining, most people signed the petition. Martin Blevins, Poulsbo, stated that he is employed by Fred Hill Materials as their Chief Financial Officer. He has a problem when false accusations are made about the company. In an e-mail, John Fabian quoted a Seattle Times article that said Fred Hill Materials was the fourth top water quality violator in the State. After more research, the newspaper retracted their statement; but John Fabian has chosen not to acknowledge the retraction on the public record. He attended a Hood Canal Coalition meeting that was held to educate the public, but a lot of the information at that meeting was not true, especially the statistic about 6,000 tons an hour. The Department of Revenue needs to decide whether the tax revenue proposal will work and they have not come back with a clear answer yet. Fred Hill Materials is an excellent employer who employs 100 Page 12 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of December 2, 2002 people in Jefferson and Kitsap County. There are a lot of trucking companies, construction companies and contractors that depend on Fred Hill Materials for their business. He supports the MRL designation. Dan Baskins, Fred Hill Materials, stated that many comments have been made about future projects if the MRL designation is approved. The application process for a project comes under very strict review and includes a complete Environmental Impact Statement. Right now, the Commissioners need to decided about the MRL designation. Mining occurs in all civilized communities, but people don't like to see it. Fred Hill Materials makes an effort to avoid critical areas when they mine by recognizing buffers and setbacks. He asked the Board to approve the MRL designation. Doug Soehl, stated that he is the Area Director for Washington Trout Unlimited. They have 5,000 members statewide and over 100 members locally. After consulting with marine and fishery biologists and touring the site, the local chapter of Trout Unlimited voted to oppose the current project. When the streams types were verified, the proper DNR protocol was not followed. There is no protection for the nearshore environment on Hood Canal if the Pit to Pier Project is allowed. They strongly oppose the Pit to Pier Project and suggest that any increase in mining operations require an Environmental Impact Statement. Doug Weese, Poulsbo, stated that the MRL designation and the Pit to Pier Project are separate. Fred Hill Materials is a responsible company involved in the communities it serves. They have built ballfields, playgrounds, and sponsored Little League teams. Jack Smith, Sequim, stated that he has never worked for Fred Hill, but he has worked for similar companies his whole life. He asked the Board to approve this project. Ted Bauman, Tacoma, said that he works for Fred Hill Materials and has been in the industry for 23 years. This is a very important deposit that will help supply the resource. The company takes great pride in the work they do and is a good steward of the community. Richard Anders, Kingston, stated that a strip mine is not environmentally friendly and it is important to protect the environment. Donald Tubbs, Redmond, GeoResources explained that he has two points he wants to emphasize. This location is a valuable mineral resource land that is hard to find. The reason there are mineral land designations is to protect the resource. The approval of the MRL designation does not approve any sort of project. People keep talking about accidents, but this doesn't need to be addressed at this time. Brad Big erg staff, GeoResources, stated that he is a hydrogeologist that has been working on the Fred Hill project for 3 years. The evaluation of the site found 3 aquifers. The mining will not extend into the groundwater. Usually mining creates an increased recharge of the area instead of a decrease. Page 13 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of December 2, 2002 Dan Taylor, said that his family has lived in Jefferson County for 4 generations. All of this country was logged or burned in the late 1800s. Jefferson County needs good jobs. Opposition to any sort of development in the County is getting worse each day. It is important that the Commissioners approve this designation now. Rich Hecker, Poulsbo, stated that his company has insured Fred Hill Materials for over 30 years. Insurance companies manage a company's risks and have to pay when something goes wrong. It is important that the company that is insured follow regulations. They are constantly investing money to find methods to control risk and prevent losses. Fred Hill Materials welcomes inspectors and takes immediate action on any suggestions. There are very few insurance companies that want to insure this type of business, but because of Fred Hill's integrity and past record it is not difficult to find companies to insure them. Forest Shomer, Port Townsend, stated that they have done a good job of reclamation at the gravel pit on Cherry Street in Port Townsend. However, the other Shine pit is an example of reclamation that hasn't been done correctly because it takes more to mediate a site than planting some fir trees. When he first moved to Washington, he lived next to a rock crushing operation that worked 16 hours a day and it made a lot of noise. Jefferson County's natural resources have been depleted over the past 150 years. If the gravel stays in the ground, it will be rarer, and become more valuable in the future. Larry Dennison, Port Townsend, stated that he agrees that the Commissioners need to be fair and follow the law. GMA requires the County to set aside mineral lands and that was done when the Comprehensive Plan was approved. For the past several years, many volunteers have been working to restore salmon habitat in the County, but it will never be what is was before. There are better ways to bring 30 jobs into the community. Dan Berg, Port Ludlow, stated that he is an employee for Fred Hill Materials and they are a great company to work for. People have said that the fish and wildlife will be gone because of the mining operation, but there is a mining operation going on right now, and they are all still there. Paul Eckley, Bremerton, stated that he supports the MRL designation. Fred Hill Material's reputation as a company in Kitsap County is impeccable. They have always had an open door communications policy and have always looked at the future. They have always done things that benefit the community. The majority doesn't always know best. The real issue is not the mining, but what the Commissioners have to decide. Carl Kep, Port Gamble, has been an employee of Fred Hill Materials for almost 20 years and they have always taken care of their employees and treated them well. The need for gravel is growing in Kitsap and Jefferson County. Many people have stated their concern about barges introducing damaging organisms to fish and wildlife. Submarines stationed at Bangor are going in and out of Hood Canal all the time and no one has mentioned the damage that they could cause or the fuel that they could lose. Page 14 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of December 2, 2002 Bethel Prescott, Irondale, stated that she isn't opposed to concrete, but she does not feel that because she drives a car, she should support this designation. If this is really about Jefferson County's need for more gravel, what is the barge for? Wendi Wrinkle, Port Ludlow, stated that she is pleased to see the number of people who took the time to come to this hearing. The main issue here is the critical areas, forestlands, wetlands, aquifer recharge areas and fish and wildlife habitat. The proposed area for the MRL designation was set aside as long term commercial forestlands during the GMA process. Is there the ability, in the case of this kind of mining, to reclaim the land to commercially viable forestland? There are options because the land is already protected by the forestland designation. Tony Guspidge, Bainbridge Island, Maritime Counsel to Fred Hill Materials, stated that the Commissioners' decision needs to be based on facts, not fear. There has been talk about barges introducing non-native species through ballast water, but barges don't take on ballast. Washington has one of the most progressive laws to prevent the introduction of non-native species. Statistics show that tug/barge traffic is the safest form of transportation among all forms of transportation, with a very low risk of oil spills. Any vessel that Fred Hill Materials would use would be U. S. owned, U. S. flagged, crewed by U. S. seaman, and regulated by the U. S. Coast Guard. Darrin Tompassky, Port Angeles, pointed out that the new Hood Canal Bridge is being built in Port Angeles but most of the rock to build it is being imported from Canada. He feels that roads need to last longer and shouldn't cost as much money to build. Alex Hill, Poulsbo, President of Fred Hill Materials, noted that this hearing is only about the MRL designation. It has been established that this area has mineral deposits and all they want is to protect the resource for future mining. Sandra Hill, Port Ludlow, stated that there is no way to separate the MRL designation from the Pit to Pier Project. Most of the comments have been about barges, damage to the bridge, and fish and wildlife habitat. It doesn't take ships to distribute gravel to Jefferson or Kitsap County. Shipping the gravel out of the area means that there won't be any left when it is needed in Jefferson County. Pete Hill, Poulsbo, former President of Fred Hill Materials, stated that anything that comes from this sort of operation doesn't (unintelligible.) Hearing no further comments on the Comprehensive Plan amendment, the Chair closed the public hearing. He noted that the deadline for written testimony on any of the Comprehensive Plan amendments will be at the close of the public hearing tomorrow that will begin at 6 p.m. at the Courthouse. Page 15 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of December 2, 2002 The meeting was recessed at the close of the public hearing on Thursday and reconvened at 6 p.m. on Friday in the Superior Courtroom at the Jefferson County Courthouse for a public hearing on the remaining Comprehensive Plan amendments. All three Commissioners were present. HEARING re: 15 Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Chairman Wojt opened the public hearing and read the public hearing procedure into the record. MLA02-36: Michael Regan, Applicant Chairman Wojt read the following regarding NH -A02-36 submitted by Michael Regan. The concern is that this hearing be fair inform and substance, as well as appearance. Each Commissioner is required to answer the following questions on the record. Do any of the Commissioners have an interest in this property or issue? Commissioner Titterness: No. Chairman Wojt: No. Commissioner Huntingford: No. Do any of you have an interest or stand to gain or lose any financial benefit as a result of the outcome of the hearing? Commissioner Titterness: No. Chairman Wojt: No. Commissioner Huntingford: No. Can you hear and consider this in a fair and objective manner? Commissioner Titterness: Yes. Chairman Wojt: Yes. Commissioner Huntingford: Yes. Has any member of the Board engaged in communication outside this hearing by opponents or proponents on the issue to be heard? Commissioner Titterness: He had a brief conversation with Mike Regan, but nothing of substance or decision. Commissioner Huntingford: The only conversations that he has had have been during a Public Comment Period. Chairman Wojt: No. Page 16 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of December 2, 2002 Do you agree that the decision on each of these Comprehensive Plan Amendments will be based solely on the established record and that you will then compare that established record to the applicable criteria listed in the Comprehensive Plan? Commissioner Titterness: Yes. Chairman Woit: Yes. Commissioner Huntingford: Yes. The Chair asked for the staff report. Associate Planner Randy Kline reported that this proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is to rezone a 12,225 square foot parcel of property located in the Port Hadlock-Irondale area from a rural residential, l dwelling unit per 5 acres, to a rural commercial landuse district. The applicant is Michael Regan. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of this amendment and DCD has recommended denial. Chairman Wojt opened the public testimony portion of the hearing on MLA02-36. Michael Regan, Port Hadlock, explained that his property is an inside corner between 2 existing commercial areas that is bordered on 2 sides by County roads. This is an isolated case. There has been no opposition from neighbors. Existing structures would be removed and more appropriate commercial buildings put in their place that would upgrade the neighborhood and provide needed services. The Planning Commission voted in favor of this proposal. Hearing no further comment, the Chair closed the public hearing on MLA02-36. MLA02-232: J. Frank Schmidt & Son Company Profit Sharing Trust, Applicant At the scheduled time of 6:15 p.m. the Chair asked DCD for their report on MLA02-232. Associate Planner Randy Kline stated that this proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment would create a new overlay district for property that is designated as commercial forestland and is adjacent to existing lots that are 1 acre and less in size. Those parcels would be allowed to develop the forestland into residential land with 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres. This is an amendment of limited scope that would apply to 120 acres in eastern Jefferson County. The proponents are J. Frank Schmidt and Son Company Profit Sharing and Trust. CraigJones, ones, stated that he is a landuse attorney in Poulsbo. The proponents appreciate the efforts of the Staff, Planning Commission, and County Commissioners to create a new transitional zone that will address the incompatibility issue that has arisen since the forestland designation was put in place. It utilizes existing UDC development standards and flexible rural residential planned unit development criteria. It allows the opportunity to buffer commercial forestlands from high density single family development. Page 17 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of December 2, 2002 Hearing no further comments, the Chair closed the public testimony portion of the hearing on MLA 02-232. Chairman Wojt explained that the next amendment is scheduled at 6:30 p.m. He added that if anyone present wants to speak on any of the other amendments, they can do so now. CraigJones, ones, stated that he is a landuse attorney and represents Discovery Timber Company. He submitted and read his letter regarding MLA 02-241, the Glen Cove LAMIRD. (See permanent record.) MLA02-239: Jefferson County, Applicant; Update Comprehensive Plan Language in Chapter 2 At 6:30 p.m., Chairman Wojt asked staff to present the report on MLA 02-239. Associate Planner Randy Kline explained that this is an amendment submitted by Jefferson County to update Comprehensive Plan language in Chapter 2 that will reflect an amendment to the GMA. Beginning in 2004, the Comprehensive Plan amendment submission deadline will be changed from May 1 to February 1 in order to allow more time to review the amendments, for the Planning Commission, and for public process. The Chair opened the public testimony portion of the hearing on MLA 02-239. Hearing no comment for or against this Comprehensive Plan amendment, Chairman Wojt closed the testimony on the update to the Comprehensive Plan language in Chapter 2. Chairman Wojt explained that the next amendment is scheduled at 6:45 p.m.. He added that if anyone present wants to speak on any of the other amendments, they can do so at this time. Jim Lindsay, Seattle, stated that he is representing the Barber and the Evans Family regarding the Glen Cove LAMIRD, MLA 02-241. His clients own property at the north end of the industrial area. The comments that Craig Jones made are appropriate to the Barber property also. The adjacent property to the north of the Barber property is in the Port Townsend UGA and is zoned commercial. The adjacent property to the east, which is the Port Townsend Paper Mill, is zoned heavy industrial. The Staff s LAMIRD proposal will zone the property to the south as light commercial. SR -20 is the boundary to the west of the property. For this reason, the property should be included in any proposal as non-residential property. He also read and submitted his letter. (See permanent record.) Ryan Tillman, Port Hadlock, stated that he wants to comment on the Glen Cove LAMIRD, MLA 02-241. The County's process to come to an agreement with the City of Port Townsend over this area did not allow citizen input. Specifically, the bulk and dimension standards will limit development in an area that is suited for concentrated development. An impervious surface coverage of 55% will create sprawling development and GMA specifically directs that this type of development be consolidated. Building sizes aren't based on reality, they are just numbers pulled out of the air that won't help existing businesses, new businesses, the Page 18 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of December 2, 2002 sprawl problem, or force other types of businesses to locate in the City. There is no reason for the building size cap, and all it is doing is keeping businesses with industrial uses out. Each business proposal should be looked at and evaluated. Ryan Tillman, Port Hadlock, stated that he also wants to comment on the Tri Area UGA, MLA 02-242. He has been working toward this designation for the last 10 years. The Tri Area does not have the characteristics of a rural area and it is time that it became a UGA. The only thing it lacks is a sewer treatment system. He cautioned against the Planning Commission's recommendation to expand the UGA boundaries at this time because it could be appealed to the Growth Management Hearings Board and the whole thing could be thrown out. MLA02-241: Jefferson County, Applicant; Glen Cove Industrial Area Light Industrial/Commercial Zone At the scheduled time of 6:45 p.m., Chairman Wojt opened the hearing on MLA 02-241, the Glen Cove LAMIRD. He added that the negotiations with the City of Port Townsend are part of this public hearing. Associate Planner Randy Kline explained that the Glen Cove amendment has 2 components. The first is the revision of the boundary by creating a 51 acre light industrial zone to the north of the light industrial commercial zone. The second component of the amendment is the development standards that will apply in both zones. Within both zones, there will be a 35 foot height limit with the ability to go to 50 feet through a conditional use process. There will be 55% impervious surface coverage. Within the new light industrial district, the building footprint limit will be 10,000 square feet with the ability to go to 20,000 square feet through a conditional use process. In the light industrial/commercial district, the building footprint limit is 20,000 square feet with the ability to go to 40,000 square feet through the conditional use process. A 40 foot buffer with a 20 foot setback along SR -20 and Old Fort Townsend Road north to the Port Townsend city limits is also proposed. The buffer requirement can be appealed through an administrative variance process. Commissioner Huntingford asked what the buffer was in the Highway 20 Corridor Policy that was adopted in the mid 1980s? Randy Kline answered that it was 30 feet. Commissioner Huntingford asked for clarification on the buffer where the Larry Scott Trail is located. Staff s interpretation is that the buffer would begin at the SR -20 right-of-way and the trail would be within the buffer. The Chair opened the public testimony portion of the hearing. Pete Langley, Port Townsend Foundry, stated that he doesn't think the City of Port Townsend should tell the County how to direct economic growth. There shouldn't be restrictions on the expansion of businesses. The industrial zoning boundaries from 1989 should be included. The footprints are too small for an industrial business to locate in the area and for future growth of existing businesses. This is at the end of the road and big conglomerates will not want to locate here. Existing businesses need to be able to grow because they Page 19 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of December 2, 2002 provide goods and services that draw money into the community. He asked that the Board not adopt the bulk and dimension standards that the City has suggested. CraigJones, ones, stated that he is a landuse attorney from Poulsbo. He submitted and read his letter regarding the addition of the Seton property into the Glen Cove LAMIRD. (See permanent record.) He noted that he supports the statements made by Ryan Tillman and Pete Langley regarding the bulk and dimension standards and agrees that proposals should be considered a conditional use where great latitude can be applied to suit the specific industrial or commercial business and area. The County shouldn't turn someone away just because their project doesn't meet a particular building size or dimension. The 40 foot buffer will create an inconsistency with what has been done according to the SR -20 Corridor Policy and will penalize new businesses. Jim Garrett, Port Townsend, stated that he is a property and business owner inside the existing Glen Cove LAMIRD. He has no economic gain in this rezone. His only goal is to have a functioning business community and he feels that in order to accomplish this, expansion of the LAMIRD is necessary. He submitted and read his letter. (See permanent record.) W. E. Seton, Port Townsend, agreed with Craig Jones' comments. Most of the buffers are already 30 feet so the people who haven't developed will be penalized. The rights-of-way for the railroad and the highway are already restricting the use of the property; adding another 40 feet that can't be used for anything is unreasonable. These buffers take up to 30% of the property in the light industrial/commercial area. The addition of light industrial designation is not enough, it should be designated the same as the light industrial/commercial acreage that already exists. A lumber yard needs to include some commercial use. In the past 2 years, he has turned down 5 businesses that wanted to start a new business or expand their current business to Glen Cove. A manufacturing company won't locate there because they have to ship in the goods to manufacture the products and then ship the products out. The commercial aspect has to be included with the light industrial designation otherwise it limits the type of business that can locate there. The 55% impervious surface is fine for a house on a lot; but in any other industrial area, the buildings occupy a lot more than 55% of the parcel. A person putting a building on 2 lots would have to buy 2 more lots to comply. The same zoning designation and standards need to apply for the entire expanded Glen Cove LAMIRD. The City shouldn't be able to tell the County what to do. Jim Lindsay, stated that he agrees with the testimony opposing the caps on building size. The purpose is to make the area appear rural. Something that is already urban can't be made to look rural. It is difficult for businesses to succeed with all the restrictions that have been applied. Other areas compete for businesses. Jefferson County needs good jobs that pay a living wage, and the space has to be made available to attract businesses. The whole idea of building caps runs contrary to the County's economic forecast because no caps were used when the land area analysis study was done to determine how much land was needed for manufacturing and commercial uses. Page 20 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of December 2, 2002 Sebastian Eggert, Port Townsend, stated that he bought his property in Glen Cove in 1988. It was zoned industrial and he planned to develop infrastructure and build a shop for his business to grow into. In1994, he got interim zoning approval for a building, and then in 1998, the property was downzoned. He feels that this is a flawed, but fairly reasonable document that allows a number of people to continue plans to develop their businesses and create more jobs. He agrees that the building caps and the impervious surface requirements are not right for many businesses. It is his understanding that a certain amount of commercial is allowed as a part of a business in the light industrial zone. Unrelated commercial usage is inappropriate except for a cafe for the work force in the area. The Glen Cove area is a good location for businesses that don't want to disturb their neighbors or the commerce in Port Townsend. He asked the Commissioners to accept this flawed document, and begin to look to the near future and creating more light industrial area, not just in Glen Cove, but also in Brinnon and Quilcene so that people can build some equity in their community by building their own businesses. Chairman Wojt answered several questions. He explained that this designation is final until a UGA is proposed and the work is done on it. The UGA in Glen Cove was put on hold about a year ago when the Commissioners agreed that they would go forward with the Tri Area UGA and revisit the Glen Cove LAMIRD boundaries. There is currently no projected timeline for the Glen Cove UGA project. Anders Ed eg rton, Chimacum, stated that he supports the setback of 40 feet because tourism is a huge part of the economy in East Jefferson County. One full sized tree is approximately 30 feet and an extra 10 feet would help as a screen so that the people coming into Port Townsend wouldn't have to look at the industrial park. Ryan Tillman, Port Hadlock, suggested that the concerns about the impervious surface coverage could be solved by making one change in the UDC that would delete gravel surface parking and gravel surface roads as impervious surfaces. Jim Garrett, Port Townsend, said that he wants this amendment to work and not have it be appealed to the Growth Management Hearings Board. He cautioned that the Commissioners need to remember that changes in the amount of industrial and commercial property are based on the research in the economic forecast done in 1999. Roger Evans, explained that he bought property that was zoned commercial in Glen Cove over 10 years ago and paid taxes on it as commercial property. The County asked for and received a corner of the property for the Larry Scott Trail. The property has been downzoned to residential, which makes no sense because of the location. He asked that they be treated fairly. John Evans, a landowner in Glen Cove, stated that eventually the Glen Cove area should be a UGA because it would allow more diverse development and revenue for the County. Page 21 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of December 2, 2002 Hearing no further comments, Chairman Wojt closed the public testimony portion of the hearing on MLA02- 241. Commissioner Huntingford asked about the difference between the staff recommendation and the agreement between the County and the City. His understanding was that commercial uses will not be allowed in the expanded light industrial area. Randy Kline replied that the current Glen Cove light industrial zone is set up with a provision for associated commercial. Associated commercial is detached associated commercial such as a sandwich shop that is serving the needs of that area. This would not be allowed in the expanded area. However, a retail component attached to a light industrial operation is allowed in the current and the proposed light industrial area. * See also comments by Craig Jones, Jim Lindsay and Ryan Tillman on page 18. MLA02-242: Jefferson County, Applicant; Adopt an Urban Growth Area Boundary in the Tri Area After the scheduled time of 7:15 p.m.,Chairman Wojt opened the hearing on MLA 02-242, the UGA boundary for the Tri Area. Associate Planner Randy Kline explained that this amendment delineates an urban growth boundary on the Jefferson County Landuse Map. The Planning Commission and DCD staff have recommended different boundaries. The rural standards in place today would continue until detailed capital facilities planning is conducted and then urban use standards would be developed. This designation would not bring about any changes on the ground in the Tri Area at this time. It would be a beginning point for infrastructure planning. The Chair opened the public testimony portion of the hearing on MLA 02-242. Anders Ed eg rton, Chimacum, stated that he supports the urban growth boundary that staff has proposed. The Planning Commission included Chimacum in their recommendation and he does not feel that this is necessary. Port Hadlock and Irondale do have residential areas and they need a sewer system eventually. Chimacum is rural in nature. Gunther Dohse, Chimacum, said that he supports the staff recommendation on the proposed urban growth boundary. For 30 years he lived in Silverdale and saw it developed from a rural area and a wetland. He asked the Commissioners to accept the staff s recommendation. Jim Lindsay, stated that he is a member of the Tri Area Planning Group and he urged the Commissioners to adopt the UGA. If the Commissioners decide not to include Chimacum at this point, they might want to note in the document that this would be reviewed in the future. He is concerned about the statement that the County doesn't intend to do anything in the Tri Area until there are sewers in the ground. More appropriate wording would be that sewers need to be planned for the Tri Area, but the County will take an incremental Page 22 Commissioners Meeting Minutes: Week of December 2, 2002 approach. There are alternative methods for sewage disposal that can be used in the interim. Over the next 20 years, people in the Tri Area need to have the option to proceed with development if they want to bear the expense of alternative sewage treatment. If the Commissioners adopt the Tri Area UGA, the County needs to adopt interim zoning to allow development activity. Crai T Durgan, Port Ludlow, stated that he owns several properties in the Chimacum area, including a business. He supports the Planning Commission's recommendation to include Chimacum in the Tri Area Urban Growth Boundary. When he bought his property, it was commercial, and then it was downzoned. If it was designated as part of the UGA, he wouldn't have to worry about this happening again. Retail leakage in this County is a problem and the only way to turn it around is to attract retail businesses so that people don't go to Kitsap or Clallam County to spend their money. Unidentified Man, stated that he opposes the UGA designation in the Tri Area. There is a problem with the statistics and how they were gathered and interpreted in order to justify this designation in the Tri Area. When actual counts came out of the 2000 census that showed. a drastically reduced growth rate, the numbers weren't used. If anything, the Tri Area should be designated as a LAMIRD. The GMA requires that a UGA be designated if it will improve an area and that it be affordable. The issue of cost per resident hasn't been addressed, the cost of a sewer system for single family residences is prohibitive, and many people will be priced out of their homes. The Tri Area Planning Group members who didn't live in the area are the members who submitted the minority report. The majority of the Planning Group members submitted a recommendation to the Commissioners that this amendment not be docketed. People can't spend their way to a better economy and not that many jobs will result from this designation. He then quoted Williams Jennings Bryan. Hearing no further comments for or against the Tri Area UGA amendment, Chairman Wojt closed the hearing. * See also comments by Ryan Tillman on page 19. MEETING ADJOURNED SEAL: AT ST: �orona-/ , CMC Clerk of the Board JEFF COUNTY ARD OFtOM0146NERS Richard W Dan Tittemess, Member .� � sr Glen Hun ' g ord, ` 'er Page 23 t r>: AT ST: �orona-/ , CMC Clerk of the Board JEFF COUNTY ARD OFtOM0146NERS Richard W Dan Tittemess, Member .� � sr Glen Hun ' g ord, ` 'er Page 23 JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC HEARING - Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA02-235 Thursday, December 5, 2002 AGENDA 6:00 p.m. I. Opening remarks by Chairman II. Department of Community Development Staff Report III. Presentation by Applicant, Fred Hill Materials IV. Presentation by the Hood Canal Coalition V. Public Testimony opens Oral testimony procedures are on the back of this agenda. 12 Y minutes 12 Y2 minutes 3 minutes each Everyone present will be given an opportunity to be heard. Before speaking, please consider whether others have previously stated what you intend to state and if your testimony would repeat what other have said. Please consider whether your testimony will add to the overall discussion. The names of the people who have indicated on the sign in sheet that they wish to speak will be called at random. The Chairman will call the name of the next speaker and the 2 that will follow so that they can come forward and sit in the reserved seats in the front of the room until their turn. All speakers are asked to address the Board from the microphone for that purpose at the front of the room. When you speak: Begin by stating your name and address. Spell your last name for the record. Speak slowly and clearly. Each person will be allowed to speak for up to 3 minutes. A speaker cannot transfer his or her surplus time to another speaker. The Clerk will start a timer when the speaker is at the microphone and ready to begin speaking. The timer has 3 lights. A GREEN light means you can continue; The YELLOW light will come on when the speaker has 1 minute left; and The RED light will come on when the speaker's time is over. If the speaker continues a buzzer will sound. Written testimony on all of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments will be accepted until the end of the public hearing tomorrow evening (Friday December 6, 2002.) There will be no further oral testimony taken on MLA02-235 Fred Hill Materials, Applicant at tomorrow's hearing. Public testimony regarding the other 5 Comprehensive Plan Amendments will be taken at the hearing scheduled for 6 p.m. tomorrow in the Superior Court Courtroom at the Unruly behavior, such as booing, hissing, clapping, harassing Jefferson County Courthouse, remarks, or other obnoxious behavior, cannot be an element of 1820 Jefferson Street, Port the hearing. This is not a popularity contest, but a legal process Townsend. in which facts and opinions are presented to unbiased decision makers. Emotional displays or undignified presentations add absolutely nothing to the hearing. If these guidelines are ignored the hearing will be halted until order is restored. lieIPF W /j. e.e. FRED HILL MATERIALS, INC. (FHM) PROPOSALS OR PENDING PROPOSALS FOR THE SHINE-THORNDYKE AREA The following is an informal, general description of the application review process timelines for current and anticipated proposals submitted by FHM to Jefferson County. The Department of Community Development (DCD) prepared this two-page document for the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) public hearing December 5, 2002 on the FHM Mineral Resource Land (MRL) overlay application, This document represents ONLY a best estimate of what will occur, and the application(s) submitted by FHM may lead to different results. MINERAL RESOURCE LAND (MRL) OVERLAY Process: • Comprehensive Plan (Comp Plan) 2002 amendment cycle docket: FHM MRL is one of 19 proposals. Planning Commission recommended approval of a 690 -acre MRL overlay (reduced from the 6,240 -acre overlay proposed by FHM in the original application). • DCD transmitted the Planning Commission recommendation to the BOCC, along with the 2002 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (FSEIS), dated November 25, which contains the final staff recommendation with conditions of approval. Copies at DCD or on County website: http://www.co.jefferson.wa.us • BOCC is holding public hearing on MLA02-235 December 5, when oral comment accepted. Written comment by close of public hearing December 6. Comments may pertain to any facet of the proposal. • BOCC will deliberate on the 2002 Docket on Monday, December 9, beginning at 2:00 PM. • County will publish decision of the governing body and forward to State Office of Community Development. • If a petition if filed by any aggrieved party within 60 days of the published notice of a Growth Management Act (GMA) action, the case goes before the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board (WWGMHB), which reviews the action for consistency with GMA (and by extension, State Environmental Policy Act=SEPA). If deemed out of compliance, it goes back to BOCC. • Appeals of WWGMHB decisions may go to Superior Court, Court of Appeals and Washington State Supreme Court. FUTURE MINERAL EXTRACTION PROPOSALS IN MRL (IF ADOPTED BY BOCC) Process: • MRL does not constitute approval for mineral extraction activities. Permits required from Jefferson County, Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Department of Ecology (Sand and Gravel permit, NPDES=National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System), and potentially others. • Jefferson County and DNR to be co -lead under SEPA for future mineral extraction proposals in Shine-Thorndyke area. Memorandum of Understanding will need to be prepared. • County permit is Type I (stormwater management), which is an administrative review (no hearing; appeal is to Superior Court). Regulations from UDC 4.24 (Mineral Extraction, Mining, Quarrying and Reclamation) apply, in addition to those of other applicable UDC sections (e.g., 3—environmentally sensitive areas protections—and 6—development standards). SEPA conditions from MRL approval, if any, also apply to project action proposals. December 5, 2002 CONVEYOR AND PIER FACILITY (PRE -APPLICATION STATUS) Process: Upon receipt of application from FHM with applicable fees, the review and public participation process will be carried out per Section 8 of the Unified Development Code (UDC), summarized as follows: • Assignment of a project planner. • Notice of Application and Notice of a threshold determination pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) will be published in the Peninsula Daily News (PDN), mailed to adjacent property owners and other parties of interest, and posted on the County website and at the Courthouse. • The threshold will likely be a Determination of Significance (DS), which prompts the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The Notice of Application will likely be combined with the DS and Scoping Notice in one document. • The first formal opportunity for the public is to participate is in the scoping process for the EIS, which is intended to narrow and specify the issues to be analyzed in the EIS. There will be a public meeting and a written comment period. • Draft EIS will be issued to or made available to agencies, citizens, and local Tribes, followed by a public comment period. A Final EIS will be prepared and issued together with a Notice of Public Hearing for a Type III permit application (conditional use zoning and shoreline). (Notice will be published and distributed as original Notice of Application and DS/Scoping Notice.) • The Hearing Examiner, a quasi-judicial independent 3rd party hired by Jefferson County, will conduct a public hearing. Written comment is accepted until at least the close of the open -record hearing. Oral comments are accepted at the hearing, as well. • The Hearing Examiner will approve, deny, or approve with conditions. The Hearing Examiner shoreline conditional use permit decision will be forwarded to Ecology, which has final authority over shoreline conditional use permits per the Shoreline Management Act. • Other agencies involved: US Army Corps of Engineers (ACOD—and by extension National Marine Fisheries Service and US Fish and Wildlife Service), DNR (?), Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (Hydraulic Project Approval), Ecology—with only ACOE having a public comment process. • County permits include: zoning conditional use (Type III permit per UDC Section 8), shoreline conditional use (Type III permit), stormwater management (Type I permit). • Time line for County permits: 120 -day clock to make a decision once DCD receives a "substantially complete" application. Clock stops for EIS preparation or other additional information request made to the applicant. Once EIS is ready or information request is fulfilled, clock is up and running again. • Appeals of a shoreline substantial development permit or shoreline conditional use permit heard by the Shoreline Hearings Board. There may be a local appeal process to an Appellate Hearing Examiner for County zoning conditional use. • Enforcement of County permit conditions managed by DCD through UDC Section 10, with participation of the Prosecuting Attorney's office, when necessary. Ecology and other agencies could be involved depending on the nature of the violation. • BOCC is not the hearing body involved in the permitting process for proposed conveyor and pier facility, but can be approached at anytime by concerned citizens. (BOCC meets every Monday to conduct public business. Public comment periods are usually from 9:30 to 10:00 AM). [END] December 5, 2002 2 �j JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-235 Fred Hill Materials Inc. DATE: ThursdaV, December 5 2002 at 6:00 p.m. PLACE: Jefferson CountV Fairgrounds NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY Testimony? YES NO MAYBE L ❑ P� ❑ ❑ ❑ Z ❑ Pq ❑ ElR F] F-1 0 ❑ ❑ R' ❑ R ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑❑ ❑ 0 0 1 0/L -7-h 0'34r� 303 � O�(-, a,- L (,-L Q4,ry,b lse5�� Int :�LJit i,e V //jam ' JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-235 Fred Hill Materials Inc. DATE: Thursday, December 5 2002 at 6:00 p.m. PLACE: Jefferson County Fairgrounds NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY Testimony? YES NO MAYBE ❑ ❑ g❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ LZ ❑ ❑ n ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ , P- ! (" � �--(,1� L 0311✓ t� di4%G` J r i ` JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-235 Fred Hill Materials Inc. DATE: ThursdaV, December 5 2002 at 6:00 p.m. PLACE: Jefferson County Fairgrounds NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY Testimony? YES NO MAYBE 'V C ❑ X ❑ ❑ t ❑ El 1Z El ❑I❑ ❑ ❑ 2[ ❑❑� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ �R ❑ El El El M El ❑ `d ❑ N 10 1%Ad 10 1041 L�41 4° L1. CL V1 vu Ci, re r7 rm - - v/0 !?�,�1,� t'-��- is� Cir z oc7R1 'I- 7v 3t, 14 a, ta, Alk A( j � c k I� l _S' - I (4k JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-235 Fred Hill Materials Inc. DATE: Thursday, December 5 2002 at 6:00 p.m. PLACE: Jefferson CountV Fairgrounds NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY Testimony? YES NO MAYBE t •� V� `fin El 11 "'C -Y/ ❑ ❑ El K F1 ❑ ❑ ❑ 1111 ® ❑ ❑ ❑ R1 ❑ y� 1,77 T -Y Y�'� 'rye 21j j µ.ms_ E �fdL �'G . , WA,i ` y / % ` c ,.``lac �F TR JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-235 Fred Hill Materials Inc. DATE: Thursday, December 5 2002 at 6:00 p.m. PLACE: Jefferson County Fairgrounds NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY Testimony? YES NO MAYBE - . kl)LS2 I" r ILI 7111 El L� ❑ ❑ LJ El aD El 2-0 11 El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ F� E -E ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ eA, ce e4- 13.c11 VaVw�e�, 1 4" PT D'Am j10rets, 91 JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-235 Fred Hill Materials Inc. DATE: Thursday, December 5 2002 at 6:00 p.m. PLACE: Jefferson County Fairgrounds NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY Testimony? YES NO MAYBE �I/Jy � �/� � �jv � �"1C:� � �j 1 j �L�Gt'`[.' ���ij ��L/ 4%�,_IG1 �% ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ � ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ F1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑❑ 1U1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ G' �? � X11 'C; i�l �� Z/,� '�l� • �% ry`C/i ��r... I �d� ► �-�i�Lc';..t, ` �.� �� �-sem 4� 160 3'i v Ll (ke,, e /Vi AV; 191;L f 44 Lpeq�p v Zs 17 5 2,55 . f L�itiN � ,,n� � JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-235 Fred Hill Materials Inc. DATE: Thursday, December 5 2002 at 6:00 p.m. PLACE: Jefferson CountV Fairgrounds NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY Testimony? YES NO MAYBE 11 El F1 ❑ ® ❑ El 4 El 9-❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Kr'A h t- f "tib, '' r)c� kLlffAlltv P7 JCC " �¢r�,,r-s� /.✓G °�'C ' C' C" C c' cr CG's?` 1 C <r�-J CL f JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-235 Fred Hill Materials Inc. DATE: ThursdaV, December 5 2002 at 6:00 p.m. PLACE: Jefferson County Fairgrounds NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY Testimony? YES NO MAYBE JJ�� / �,.99 cv 7 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ EKE] 0 EKE] El ❑ ❑ J ❑ Eg ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2' ❑ �❑ (� 9n 0,` � .- tbN C-, l Q rN I)o "L) i A) 0 4 Z;-' j ��`✓ c J, e f wi❑❑� _LKi L:�: C. A VA f At QiA 1� r�� .,c�� f� c JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-235 Fred Hill Materials Inc. DATE: ThursdaV, December 5 2002 at 6:00 p.m. PLACE: Jefferson County Fairgrounds NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY Testimony? YES NO MAYBE nn a,wj,-T41-A (� y snn, j 94 ❑ ❑❑ El ❑ 9 ❑ ❑ ❑N❑CIL.)rG.a ❑fl❑ El El rEl, � ❑ VN El E ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ �L ! -,EC-t.c.. ✓d��'^'"L. L^'21' �1��+t0" �j `J� J11 !lC Froc�t gwe (YL To—( -,/w 00 � 1 � Qllbla,/ d1/ 5f-U� Ily.c�.=i/G1 13�=« ��i A���� ��'I� � ��- L4�� ��� r� X14 s f 3-2-,,r A/?1,4-e�� ��- � ���� - ..1 ' i '/' y/ f IZ2,4 ;v1 fi 1 1 r�)& JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-235 Fred Hill Materials Inc. DATE: Thursday, December 5 2002 at 6:00 p.m. PLACE: Jefferson CountV Fairgrounds NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY Testimony? YES NO MAYBE c> c l - Com, (T � � ❑ ❑ ❑ F1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 12 0 � ❑ TJ ❑ 5j ❑ Fr ❑ L 16� Ke4' f -, �ct,L�' �l �✓�J nl D�� i cJZ "p,:) 41 w 13,c, -)1 ��' ',,� t ,( (.t ,b A -e) Nt���9�`f� i✓��L� G-� ChO6- O RAiC4?r-� 71 -74eW6W6C ) t'T- JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-235 Fred Hill Materials Inc. DATE: Thursday, December 5 2002 at 6:00 p.m. PLACE: Jefferson County Fairgrounds NAME (Please Prim 5 ,,., �r .*✓ /� �� ,ei�? STREET ADDRESS '� p� .l Tt. C`_`%` CITY / v d / .rL Testimony? YES NO MAYBE ❑ 11`"11 ❑ [I ❑ 11 r El El a F ❑ �❑ ❑ ® ❑ N El El 1111❑ 1111❑ � �, ,� ,, LL P7 � V4)q /17 L v.�) ko r�•c �. ; 5�� �-- If 2 (v Azy/1 r L L c Imo' 4 1. fT Dw al.A,wpi. Tf- LAOkl �V JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-235 Fred Hill Materials Inc. DATE: Thursday, December 5 2002 at 6:00 p.m. PLACE: Jefferson County Fairgrounds NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY Testimony? YES NO MAYBE ❑ e❑ El 0 El dEl F� d❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El [10 ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 4 JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-235 Fred Hill Materials Inc. DATE: Thursday, December 5 2002 at 6:00 p.m. PLACE: Jefferson County Fairgrounds NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY Testimony? YES NO MAYBE 6"4n L C�Cv El ❑ ❑ K El El 2 ❑ ❑ El El El � ❑ ❑ ❑ (6 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2/❑ PI) � O ,, it AL2 1' kIS--vi' 4kr�'X"(�4- L�' �[- ` eL�/ ..� �r •Jj t V}j,.-. �e .7 .. �..Ile -,�' ! J �r-� 4L"t1 �r^l moi... / •C 2"4&= JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-235 Fred Hill Materials Inc. DATE: Thursday, December 5 2002 at 6:00 p.m. PLACE: Jefferson CountV Fairgrounds NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY Testimony? (� YES NO MAYBE � u c i'i l't` Le ` 1 S`Rf a a� ISS' �a �2��C S ❑ ❑ ❑ Com%C iLl.ls ❑ R ❑ pet /!?,le- tip 2^A4 ❑ ❑ j : ❑ El ,�t� t✓J . G� _ 's l i CGk. GT1- G� 1 r ---4 El 0 Z-- ❑ ❑ P144 K.."I S - k N El "Vll-ea2 El F� �/ � .f✓,i� , ./ � -� �� .� ��.� • �t,���, . � ;:?J",,GC.i. t��x'��i,Y ! ❑ 16� ❑ G.�160 19 7 ❑ JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST IHEARIN(' - Cnmnrph,=n(zi%i= Plan am 14 4 K A I A n,-, nnr DATE: ThursdaV, December 5, — '- - i icy Ctun !am., 111u, 2002 at 6:00 P.M. PLACE: Jefferson County Fairgrounds NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY Testimony? YES NO MAYBE PT El El F1 El R R R El El R [5 0 R R El El R Z El F] F] IR El El R El El El El El R R F1 pq�' c, i (0 (4-Z" 66,. A 14 "L 4 iki 6-M 6 � ti Z J S r)1)t re 6-, A A t'+. Lu t-6ck) .,(a, Y) C-(��, S "V- el -an 0 r J2 c- q JEFFERSON COUNTY . GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-235 Fred Hill Materials Inc. DATE: ThursdaV, December 5 2002 at 6:00 p.m. PLACE: Jefferson County Fair rounds NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY Testimony? YES NO MAYBE Q -1 -TV, vv\ PV� { 0 &\,,- 75- F� ❑ F1 ❑ ❑ 19 ❑ ❑ ❑ (, ❑ LJ ❑ � 0 q ❑ ❑ ❑ 71 4 E7�% � YCrYL. -Jl In c tj (>, MG;r \V\ I y.i� f15 �oLIU NIT: -Lock (c'.,ri PC, SVC re.� BO ,,.) "Iq 4 ✓j 2-00-, I J. ('�e P S �: o. ce �+�► a (.t� o LL�v\ tj c �}t�5 PvAl e' in o P�^ Z 02:.� ' S 1..� j� IN I Y`. V JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-235, Fred Hill Materials, Inc. DATE: Thursday, December 5, 2002 at 6:00 p.m. PLACE: Jefferson County Fair grounds NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY Testimony? YES NO MAYBE 'S2AP ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ R [IF LO I VL I IvIlt JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-235, Fred Hill Materials, Inc. DATE: Thursday, December 5, 2002 at 6:00 p.m. PLACE: Jefferson County Fair grounds NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY Testimony? YES NO MAYBE Ij R R R ❑R F] ❑R 0 R F] R F1 11 D 1111 El PC f7.-y-4c�,'r 19 7 JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-235 Fred Hill Materials Inc. DATE: Thursday, December 5 2002 at 6:00 p.m. PLACE: Jefferson CountV Fairgrounds NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY Testimony? YES NO MAYBE ❑ ❑ ❑❑a ❑ © ❑ -1 El E ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El El El El F El ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ il ' i t V� yj •t 7 L' �'' ti � • w Ccrr lC,... 1....-e.,� r �s L- lP J' C,..� f I ¢! �, f�W W,4t- 2-3 k/ P i LKENI 44-&, l `f '01 /44 S �e� j b O TA1176,We A� - 4,11Qw VA 04-21,11 VkA, AL 9 3'k W B ;L,- 4� a ;� Pte, 1' 7 t' -, V,;A i` fi .- i .� � • �� �a •!� oar. �e December 5, 2002 Jefferson County Commissioners Port Townsend, Washington Commissioners,' Fred Hill Materials pit to pier project starts with a pit but it doesn't end at the pier. FHM's control may end at the pier but the impact of their actions goes far beyond. Their project will greatly benefit FHM but will severely impact the health and survival of the delicately balanced natural systems in Hood Canal. The impact on the Hood Canal Bridge, and I mean impact literally, will be tremendous. Their proposed plan estimates that they will ship five million tons of gravel out of Food Canal each year. They have stated they intend to use sixty thousand ton ore carriers and twenty thousand ton barges to transport the gravel. They say that ninety percent of the gravel will go by barge under the east approach to the Hood Canal Bridge. To transport ninety percent of five million tons, or 4,500,000 tons will require 225 trips per year, utilizing twenty ton barges or 38 round trips per month. If they use five thousand ton barges as they did in their much publicized demonstration (which incidentally took place on a beautiful sunny day with no wind, at high slack tide and with and empty barge) then they would need to make 76 trips, one way each month. That 152 found trips per month for the barges and they say around 20 round trips per month for the ore carriers, for a total of 172 trips per month through or into the Hood Canal bridge. I say "into" because of the results of a study by the U.S. Coast Guard over a ten year period in which vessels impacted bridges 1322 times. That's an impact every 66 hours. Costs to repair about 80 million dollars; 58 people died. All of this barge traffic and ore carrier traffic is in addition to the gravel now being hauled by FHM in trucks. They are not going to reduce the number of truck deliveries they have now, and they shouldn't as long as there is a need for gravel in the immediate area. Maybe FHM can construct a four -mile conveyor that's quiet, maybe they can build a pier without damage to the eel grass. I don't think so. Maybe they can mine five million tons of gravel per year without creating any dust; I don't think so, maybe they won't damage the acquifers, I don't think so. But gentlemen, tugs and ore ships do not run on solar power. They will pollute Hood Canal. There is no way to clean the hulls of ocean going vessels. They will bring foreign species into Hood Canal. There is no way to filter ballast water; they will bring invasive foreign species into Hood Canal. The exchange of ballast water on the high seas is now a voluntary action at the discretion of the ships captain. A 20,000 ton ore carrier has ballast tanks capable of containing 2,319,000 gallons of water. Ore carriers envisioned by FHM will have a capacity of sixty thousand tons. It will take approximately thirteen hours to fill one ship. The ships do not shut down when being filled. They expect ten ore carriers per month. That's 130 hours per month at the dock and an additional couple of hours transit time, spewing diesel fumes in the air; not to mention the noise. Add to that 152 trips per month with five thousand ton barges and tugs burning 80 to 100 gallons of diesel per hour for at least four and a half hours each trip (that's 68,400 gallons per month) and you have pollution with a Capital P. 2 A rule of thumb used by Foss Maritime for fuel consumption is based on horsepower, ie. a 2400 Hp tug like the one used by FHM in their demonstration would burn approximately 2400 gallons per day or 100 gallons per hour. I don't think the County should be influenced by offers of sand for beaches, possibility of a few jobs or phantom tax income. I think this project should be evaluated on a balance between tangible benefits to the citizens of Jefferson County against the pollution and commercialization of Hood Canal as envisioned by FHM. Gentlemen, you have the opportunity and I believe the responsibility to deny FHM's request for a mineral overlay and subsequent pit to pier project for the greater good of Jefferson County and the survival of Hood Canal. `1"ha you for yo consideration. Dick Keithahn 281 South point Road 3 HOOD CANAL EN VI Aureric, P. O. BOX 87 > S Jefferson County Commissioners .Port Townsend, Vashington Dear Commissioners, MENTAL COUNCIL Tn)glle Heritnn e BECK, WASHINGTON 98380 december 5, 2002 t The Hood Canal 1,hvironmental Council is a citizens' organization which for more than thirty years has been active in defending the Canal and its watershed against environmental threats. I will spare you a lecture on the documented degradation of all of :Puget Sound and the par— ticular fragility of the Canal, assuming you are already well educated. t;e are told that we are dealing at the present moment only with a redesignation of certain acres of forest land to gravel mining. lie also know, however, that this is an attempt to arrive at a much larger proposal through a piecemealing approach and therefore we :are compelled to speak out now. This is not just a Jefferson County question. It involves the whole of Hood Canal, which makes it, in fact, national. tie quite recognize the utility of sensibly sited gravel mines; our objection is to the endangerment of the watershed and shoreline of the Canal by this larger proposal. The Jefferson County Commissioners need to consider the whole picture and not back into it a piece at a time. t4hat is needed NOW is a clear declaration that, however this present hearing may proceed, there will be no commercial dock in flood Canal and no large ocean—going vessels coming south of the bridge. One oil spill or one dispersal of invasive species through bilge—pumping and the Canal can be destroyed. iie understand that the Teamsters Union has come out in favor of this project. To the Union and its individual members, we would say: you should join us in our opposition to this misguided pit—to—pier pro— posal. With a conveyor belt going directly to ocean—going vessels, there would be no jobs for truckers. Once it has been established that the pier will not be permitted, there remains the question of the danger to the watershed of such a large— scale gravel mining operation. There are those who assume we can avoid such dangers by placing restrictions on it. We wish that were true. Neither the State nor its Counties, however, have demonstrated either the financial means or the will to enforce any restrictions placed.. Given Fred Hill Materials' demonstrable ignoring of the restrictions on their present pits, we think they are the last company to trust with further permits. yes, the State has certified the Shine pit as being "in com— pliance," but this can be shown to be false and is a clear instance of the lack of will to enforce. We have reason to be worried. I have been warned against using the wog^ds "green scam" for some of Fred Bill's ;procedures, so I substitute the words "environmentally ques— tionable." One look at the composition of the Board of Directors for the Puget Sound Beach t%storation project shows that it is a false front IICUC — 2 created by r -ed dill iaterials. If there are any open minds connected with it, I say to them: you shuuld ,join us in opposition to the pit—to— pier proposal. The so—called "free gravel" being offered as environmen— tal bait is far from free. There is no gain in temporarily enhancing scattered beaches at the cost of destroying Hood Canal. The Book of Genesis gives us the story of Esau who sold his birthright for a mess of pottage. hell, gravel is not pottage, but the Hood Canal is the birthright of all of us and we are certainly being asked to sell our birthright for a mess. The flood Canal kvironmental Council cannot stand by and allow this to happen unopposed. lie went to court some years ago and defeated a much smaller proposed gravel mine that endangered the hood Canal shoreline. Such a resort to the courts might better be avoided as it costs both the County and individual citizens a lot of money, but naturally we and other organizations will follow through if it is required of us. lie ask the Jefferson County Commissioners to make it clear now that this environmental disaster will not go forward. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely William 11. Matchett President Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 December 5, 2002 Board of County Commissioners 1820 Jefferson Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Gentlemen v The Hood Canal Coalition requests that you deny the Fred Hill Materials MRL designation. This matter is too important to decide without presentation of detailed studies, and comprehensive public review. Fred Hill Materials has pressured the County to ignore its imminent pit to pier proposal, while at the same time conducting a massive public relations plan to promote that proposal. That approach, and Fred Hill Materials' last minute submission of a new application for supposedly less acreage of mining, has allowed a piecemeal approach to proceed without adequate evaluation of the potential consequences. We ask that you not permit such an approach to further pollute the decision process. The Hood Canal Coalition is a group of local citizens concerned about the impacts of the Fred Hill Materials proposed Thorndyke pit to pier project that threatens our environment, canal, bridge and the local economy. A decision to designate this MRL enables this massive industrial project. Seventy-six percent of our 1600 members live in Jefferson County, 11 percent in Kitsap County and 4 percent in Clallam County. Our members are engineers, physicians, civil servants, merchants, health care providers, environmental scientists, attorneys, accountants, homemakers, tradesmen, realtors, retirees and others from virtually every corner of Jefferson County. Our members represent every part of the local community and contribute greatly to county tax revenues and voter registration rolls. A number of absentee property owners, who are also HCC members, live in King, Snohomish and Pierce counties and in other states. Any evaluation of our membership quickly confirms that we are properly and legitimately concerned citizens, not wild-eyed mavericks or habitual troublemakers. In fact, the majority of our members are experiencing their first exposure to activism. We are serious people, and many of our members have distinguished backgrounds in business, industry, and public service. We believe that we have a right to be heard on a matter that will influence the very fabric of our future in Jefferson County. We are 100 percent committed to upholding that right. As part of our campaign, we have collected 3000 signatures on a petition that states that our Coalition and its supporters unequivocally oppose the pit to pier project. Nearly 70 percent of the signers are residents of Jefferson County. Others live in adjoining counties, are absentee homeowners, or other devotees of Hood Canal. The gathering of these signatures has been a rewarding process. In our experience, 8 or 9 people out of 10 have signed our petition when they hear what it is about. It is important to note that none of our petition signatures has been collected by paid solicitors. We have not paid for a single signature. Fred Hill Materials has gone to lengths never seen in this community to portray its opposition as a bunch of NIMBYs, the dismissive term used to try to discredit citizens who have legitimate concerns and questions. In particular, they have aimed their bombastic threats and accusations at two of our most visible members, and privately tried to intimidate anyone who has submitted written or e-mail comments to you. This effort to silence your constituents has not and will not succeed. Hood Canal is everybody's back yard, a place of magnificent beauty and an essential part of the marine and terrestrial environment of Jefferson County. Don't be fooled by Fred Hill Materials' campaign to attack its broad based opposition rather than defend its proposal. Instead, examine the facts. Just who opposes this MRL? Are they a small bunch of unhappy locals? Not on your life! We are a broadly-based coalition of concerned citizens and business people united in our resolve to protect one of the most precious resources of Washington State. What is more, our Coalition brings together an equally broad range of valid reasons why this MRL and the pit to pier proposal tied to it are against the best interests of the County, its citizens, and the State. On the government front, the opposition to this proposal includes the Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe, which opposes the MRL and has serious concerns about the pit to pier project. We also have the support of Chris Endresen of the Kitsap County Board of Commissioners, who asks you to "consider the logical long-term consequences of any amendment and subsequent permits." On the political front, we are supported by the Jefferson County Democrats and Central Committee, who unanimously passed a resolution declaring "its opposition to the Fred Hill Materials 'Pit to Pier' Hood Canal mining proposal and the MRL that enables it." In addition, the Jefferson County Green Party "strongly opposes the Fred Hill mineral overlay project," and continues, "everything about this project is detrimental to the social and environmental health of Jefferson County." A number of community groups oppose the MRL and support the Hood Canal Coalition. These include the Mats Mats Area Coalition which has years of experience with the local mining industry. The Shine Plats Property Owners' Association with 18 homes, the Bridgehaven Water Commission with 180 homes, the Edgewater Beach Community Club with 450 homes and the Trails End Property Owners Association with 100 homes, all oppose the MRL. People for a Liveable Community, and the Better Brinnon Coalition support the Hood Canal Coalition. We are also supported by members of the business community. The Pacific Coast Shellfish Growers Association, whose members harvest $40 million a year in oysters, clams and mussels from Puget Sound -- much of that from Hood Canal -- support our Coalition. Several of the local shellfish farmers individually have spoken against the Fred Hill Materials project and MRL. The Olympic Peninsula Travel Association, with 150 member businesses, has stated that they "totally agree with the arguments made against the Fred Hill and Pope Resources project..." Several local real estate professionals are members of the Hood Canal Coalition and have spoken against the project and MRL, warning of lower property values and decreased property tax revenues. Our members also include numerous small business owners who have joined with us in opposing the pit to pier project and the MRL. Two key regional environmental groups are important to our team. First, the 30 -year old Hood Canal Environmental Council has given us strong support. This is the group that was largely responsible for terminating a similar pit to pier project at the mouth of the Hamma Hamma River 25 years ago. We also have the full support of the Olympic Environmental Council which is an umbrella organization addressing a broad spectrum of environmental issues facing the Peninsula. We have enormous support from the state-wide environmental community. This is led by the Cascade Chapter of the Sierra Club with 26,000 members, concerned about damage to wetlands and aquifers. Audubon Washington with 22,000 members and 4 regional Audubon Societies are our partners in fighting the pit to pier and the MRL, desiring to protect valuable bird habitat. People for Puget Sound with 10,000 members has joined with us and provided strong support in defense of Hood Canal's precious aquatic environment. 1000 Friends of Washington with 2,200 members opposes the MRL and the piecemeal project approval process; stating that this is "an impermissible segmenting of the development proposal." These groups recognize both the importance of protecting Hood Canal against this proposal and against letting the camel's nose in under the tent to industrialize the Canal. Fishing groups have spoken out just as strongly, to protect their members' interests in insuring healthy fisheries for all of us and our children. The Washington Council of Trout Unlimited with 5,000 members and the 103 local members of the Rainshadow Chapter of Trout Unlimited are actively involved in opposing the destruction of marine habitats. Washington Trout is opposed to the MRL and calls for denial of the application or much more extensive study and public scrutiny. Wild Olympic Salmon and its 500 members have endorsed our efforts and oppose the MRL and pit to pier project. The North Olympic Salmon Coalition and its 250 members have pointed to several key deficiencies in Jefferson County environmental documents related to the MRL. The Fred Hill Materials' NIMBY claim, like so much of what we have heard from them, has no substance. The Hood Canal Coalition is an organization with many voices and many cooperating partners. Our voices speak for the future of Jefferson County and the Olympic Peninsula. The Hood Canal Coalition believes that the County Planning Commission did not act in the best interest of the citizens of Jefferson County. Their job was made harder by the last minute submission of a new proposal, which misled them to believe that it was some sort of compromise due to its lower acreage number. You must not make the same mistake. Our Coalition understands perfectly that approval of this MRL would be a full endorsement of the pit to pier. Fred Hill Materials' new proposal is not a "middle ground," and no one who has signed our Petitions, submitted comments, or testified will accept that false notion. The Department of Community Development has ignored the well -advertised and promoted pit to pier project, that even the proponent directly links with this MRL, and the impending disaster it would mean for Jefferson County. Both the Staff and Planning Commission have insisted that we ignore what everyone knows. This head -in -sand approach has resulted in a wrong and indefensible recommendation, based on incomplete analysis, and unsupportable assumptions. Worse yet, the very same members who spoke out strongly to prevent any discussion of pit to pier then vocally supported ineffective "conditions" specific to the pit to pier proposal. Our Coalition sees the contradiction as well as the inadequacies of this action. But now it is your turn to make a decision. You must go beyond the narrow perspectives of the Planning Commission and the Department of Community Development. Now is not the time to act as though the pit to pier project is merely a "concept" or a phantom project. Now is not the time to ignore the obvious economic and environmental dangers that lie ahead. Now is not the time to relinquish control of our land management responsibilities. Now is not the time to brush aside the Comprehensive Plan requirement for a complete environmental review on all mineral land designations. The time has now come for you to do your important work and to represent the citizens of Jefferson County. The proponent has clearly not proven its case. In fact, it has not even been asked to prove it. In contrast to an application based on massive advertising but no justification, the opposition is broad, well informed, and has presented to you compelling reasons to deny the application. The pit to pier project and the MRL are bad for Jefferson County. Allow Fred Hill Materials to continue truck -based gravel mining in Jefferson County, but deny this MRL. An approval unmistakably signals an endorsement of the pit to pier proposal and is against the will and interests of Jefferson County. hank ou. r� John FaVal Hood Coalition 100 Shine Road Port Ludlow, WA 98365 Attch Ltr from Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe dated 9/30/02 Ltr from Chris Endresen dated 10/24/02 Copy of Democratic Party Resolution approved 11/26/02 E-mail from Jefferson County Green Party dated 11/19/02 Ltr from Pacific Coast Shellfish Growers Association dated 9/23/02 E-mail from Pacific Coast Shellfish Growers Association dated 12/2/02 Ltr from Jon Day dated 9/30/02 Ltr from Baywater Inc dated 9/30/02 E-mail from Olympic Peninsula Travel Association dated 9/22/02 Ltr from Mats Mats Area Coalition dated 9/30/02 Ltr from Shine Plat Property Owners' Association dated 11/18/02 Ltr from Bridgehaven Water Commission dated 9/24/02 Ltr from Bridgehaven Water Commission dated 8/15/02 Ltr from Edgewater Beach Community Club dated 11/23/02 Ltr from Edgewater Beach Community Club dated 11/23/02 E-mail from Trails End Property Owners Association Board of Directors dated 12/4/02 Ltr from People for a Liveable Community dated 9/19/02 Ltr from Better Brinnon Coalition dated 9/26/02 Ltr from Hood Canal Environmental Council dated 8/19/02 Ltr from Hood Canal Environmental Council dated 9/23/02 Ltr from Hood Canal Environmental Council dated 9/23/02 Ltr from Olympic Environmental Council dated 9/19/02 Ltr from Olympic Environmental Council datedl0/1/02 Ltr from Cascade Chapter of Sierra Club dated 12/3/02 Ltr from Kitsap Audubon Society dated 11/14/02 Ltr from Seattle Audubon Society dated 9/29/02 Ltr from Admiralty Audubon Society dated 11/20/02 Ltr from People for Puget Sound dated 9/30/02 Ltr from People for Puget Sound dated 9/30/02 Ltr from People for Puget Sound dated 12/2/02 Ltr from 1000 Friends of Washington dated 12/3/02 Ltr from Washington Council, Trout Unlimited dated 10/5/02 E-mail from Rainshadow Chapter of Trout Unlimited dated 9/13/02 Ltr from Washington Trout dated 9/30/02 Ltr from Wild Olympic Salmon undated Ltr from Wild Olympic Salmon dated 9/25/02 Ltr from North Olympic Salmon Coalition dated 9/26/02 Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, Washington 98365 Jefferson County Commissioners 1820 Jefferson Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Attn: Dan Titterness, District #1 Glen Huntingford, District #2 Richard Wojt, District # 3 Re: Fred Hill Materials Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application MLA 02 — 0235 Dear Commissioners, There is no justification for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment request before you. Jefferson County has already fulfilled its requirement under GMA and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan to protect mineral resources. Twenty MRLs were designated during adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. In addition mineral resources are protected as an underlying use within the 330,000 acres of Commercial Forest Lands. The mineral resources within the current MRL request are fully protected. The purpose of the FHM request is to enable the Pit to Pier Project. The MRL and the Pit to Pier Project are inextricably linked. They have been continuously linked by FHM time and time again. FHM actions including PR tours, barge demonstrations, TV and newspaper ads, inaccurate claims of tax revenue and meeting notes referencing conveyor belts, piers, barges and extracting gravel at 6000 tons per hour are not about an MRL! They are about the Pit to Pier Project. FHM has conducted a PR campaign of unprecedented magnitude in Jefferson County to sell this project. The PR campaign contains no substance just as there is no substance to their MRL request. In fact the only thing they have used to justify this MRL request is their PR campaign. FHM has planted more reclamation trees in their TV and newspaper ads than in real life! DCD staff and the Planning Commission have attempted to separate the MRL from the Pit to Pier project. In doing so they have failed to provide adequate justification for any size MRL between 0 to 6,240 acres. That FHM has submitted a new proposal which within a very short time frame reduced the acreage from 6,240 to 765 without proper analysis or adequate explanation should cause you concern. That the PC further reduced it to 690 without adequate analysis should cause even greater concern. The PC has failed to follow the provisions of the GMA, and Jefferson County C. P. in forming their recommendation. There has been inadequate analysis of the impacts of a land use decision that is clearly linked to the largest industrial project ever submitted to Jefferson County. The Planning Commission failed miserably in their efforts to separate the MRL from the Pit to Pier. Those Planning Commission members who objected most vehemently to any discussion of the Pit to Pier were the same who most enthusiastically proposed and embraced project specific conditions. They passed an advisory recommendation that FHM be charged a per tonnage fee to pay for project inspection, compliance and enforcement. They also voted to restrict barge traffic to passing under the east end of the Hood Canal Bridge so as not to disrupt traffic flow. These recommendations were made without any analysis or justification much like their decision on the size of the MRL. The 690 acres recommended by the PC might as well have been picked out of a hat! The MRL and the Pit to Pier are one and the same. Any attempt by you to portray the MRL as a stand alone issue will not for one minute fool the 1600 members of the HCC, the 3,000 people who signed petitions against the project and the 700 plus people who provided written comment against it. If you vote for this MRL then you are voting for the Pit to Pier Project. You will be sending a message to the people of Jefferson County that you want the Pit to Pier Project. You will be opening the door for FHM to proceed with a project of unknown consequences over which you will have little if any further control. Do not hand over what you know to be a large and potentially harmful project to under staffed and under budgeted permitting and regulatory agencies without an adequate needs assessment and impact analysis. Do not assume these things will be accomplished at the project level review. There are many examples of that not occurring, indeed some right here involving the same applicant said to be in "compliance" by an agency which extended deadlines rather than make them actually comply. As you well know, these agencies are often advocates for the industry they regulate, are hamstrung by "voluntary compliance" policies, and lack enforcement capabilities. There is little communication or coordination between them. The FHM track record of false reports, voodoo tax schemes, intimidation, and slick PR campaigns is not reassuring to the citizens of Jefferson County. If you approve this MRL, you are playing Russian roulette with our environment, economy, transportation lifeline and quality of life. We will hold you accountable for assuming risks on our behalf that we are not willing to accept. Especially when there is no need to do so. There is no hurry. You are under no legal obligation to grant this MRL. FHM can continue to mine gravel. Nothing bad happens if you say no. There is a huge potential for bad things to happen if you say yes. We ask that you say no to the current request. We ask that you do not make a positive decision on any MRL request by FHM until all details of the Pit to Pier Project that relate to the MRL are on the table and examined. A land use decision of this magnitude should not be made without consideration and full understanding of the long term, downstream cumulative impacts. There are a lot of Jefferson County citizens counting on you. The membership of the HCC is counting on you. So are the many organizations, including the Jefferson County Democrats, the Pacific Coast Shellfish Growers Association, Seabeck Shellfish Farm, Bridgehaven Water, the Jefferson County Green Party, the Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe, People for Puget Sound, the Olympic Environmental Council, the Hood Canal Environmental Council, Wild Olympic Salmon, Washington Council of Trout Unlimited, Audubon Washington, the Sierra Club, the Mats Mats Area Coalition and the many others who have joined us in voicing their opposition to this MRL and Pit to Pier Project. This is not NIMBY opposition, as FHM's relentless advertising campaign would like you to believe. Please acknowledge the following given fact in making your decision. Saving undeveloped shoreline is cheaper and less risky than trying to repair damaged areas. The same principle holds true for the Hood Canal Bridge, the Peninsula economy, the environment and all the other amenities of living in Jefferson County. Make a decision regarding the MRL and Pit to Pier Project that favors the long term benefit of the public, your constituents, over the short term benefit of a few. Sincerely, Members of the Hood Canal Coalition ENDORSEMENTS POLITICAL Jefferson County Democrats Jefferson County Green Party Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe COMMUNITY Mats Mats Area Coalition Better Brinnon Coalition Shine Plats Property Owners Association People For A Liveable Community Bridgehaven Water BUSINESS Pacific Coast Shellfish Growers Association Seabeck Shellfish Farm Baywater Inc. ENVIRONMENTAL People for Puget Sound 1000 Friends of Washington Cascade Chapter of the Sierra Club Olympic Environmental Council Hood Canal Environmental Council North Olympic Salmon Coalition Wild Olympic Salmon Washington Council of Trout Unlimited Rainshadow Chapter of Trout Unlimited Washington Trout Audubon Washington Grays Harbor Audubon Society Seattle Audubon Society Kitsap Audubon Society Admiralty Audubon Society PORT GAMBLE SIKLALLAM TRIBE 31912 Little Boston Road NE Kingston, WA 98346 (360) 297-2646 (360) 297-7097 Fax September 30, 2002 Jefferson County Planning Commission 621 Sheridan St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 Board of County Commissioners 1820 Jefferson St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 RE: 2002 Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan/Development Code Amendments Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the 2002 Jefferson County comprehensive plan/development code amendments. Jefferson County has made significant advances in ID Growth Management Act (GMA) compliance over the past two years. These advances include: adoption of the new Uniform Development Code (UDC), settlement of two UDC court challenges with provisions that strengthen the development rules, creation of an active Natural Resources Department, and adoption of a seawater intrusion ordinance. In addition, Tribal and County staff are now actively working together to map floodplains and channel migration zones in the principal river corridors of east Jefferson County to safeguard flood -prone communities and protect fish habitat. The Tribe commends Jefferson County for this important progress in the areas of community development and natural resources protection. The annual review of the comprehensive plan and development code provides the County, its citizens, and interested parties an important opportunity to review long-term land use goals and policies to encourage proper community development and safeguard our treasured public resources. The Tribes generally defer to counties and applicable state agencies on individual land use decisions. However, in certain circumstances where our Treaty -reserved rights are in jeopardy we do comment on certain aspects of major developments. The 2002 annual review of comp plan amendment packet contains two such developments that the Tribe is concerned with. 1. Fred Hill Materials mineral resource lands designation n The Port Gamble SiKlallam Tribe has not yet taken a position on the proposed Fred Hill Materials, Inc. (FHM) Thorndyke project, which includes pit expansion and construction of a gravel conveyance structure and pier on the shoreline of Hood Canal. Since no comprehensive project proposal has yet been formally proposed, we believe taking a position for/against this project is premature. However, the designation of a mineral resource lands (MRL) overlay covering 6,240 acres of Pope Resources commercial forestland has broad implications on the natural and human communities of east Jefferson County and we question if the review process and applicable regulations will be sufficient to avoid apparent conflicts. Jefferson County planning staff and FHM representatives have persistently emphasized that the mineral resource land (MRL) designation is the only aspect of this large-scale industrial development under review at this time. However, the Tribe feels that the scope and magnitude of this project warrant a thorough consideration of the entire project given the numerous, substantive environmental considerations. To date, the Tribe has not been afforded an opportunity to review FHM environmental studies on their proposed project. Of our preliminary concerns with this project, one has direct application to the FHM mineral resource lands designation process: Groundwater -surface water impacts n Groundwater resources of the Thorndyke deposit feed the principal salmon streams in the project area, Thorndyke and Shine creeks, as well as numerous lakes and wetlands. These streams and wetlands harbor relatively pristine habitat for coho, fall chum, and potentially ESA -listed summer chum salmon, as well as a host of other valued wildlife populations. The extent of these groundwater deposits transcends the boundaries of designated fish and wildlife habitat buffers and mapped critical aquifer recharge areas (CARAs). Various Jefferson County UDC, WA - DNR, and WA -Ecology rules provide some assurances that stormwater run-off and groundwater contamination could be avoided, and that post -mining land reclamation could be accomplished. But there is currently no legal mechanism to protect natural groundwater supply and delivery processes to stream aquifers. With additional information from FHM groundwater studies, Jefferson County could delineate MRL boundaries that were sensitive to these groundwater resources. We suggest that the County investigate this opportunity before proceeding with a blanket MRL designation. In addition, the Tribe has concerns with the FHM Thorndyke project related to impacts on marine water quality, Treaty -reserved fisheries, wildlife migration corridors, and shoreline ecological processes. Though these concerns are arguably beyond the scope of the MRL designation review, we maintain that every aspect of this project needs careful review before FHM is allowed to vest their interests through a 6,240 -acre MRL designation: Marine water quality n The rich fish and shellfish resources of north Hood Canal would be severely compromised by oil or other petrochemical spills associated with increased barge and ship traffic. Approximately 80-90% of Tribal households depend on commercial or subsistence shellfish harvests for their livelihood and an oil spill would have a devastating impact on these families. Treaty -reserved salmon fisheries n Increased barge and ship traffic would disrupt the salmon net fisheries, which concentrate around the Hood Canal bridge area. Tribal fisheries are already constrained by Naval Subbase Bangor operations, and additional limits on salmon net fisheries in north Hood Canal would further erode the Tribesi Treaty -reserved rights to harvest salmon. Wildlife migration corridors n The construction of 4-10 foot -wide, 4 -80 -high, 3.9 mile long conveyor system from the Shine pit to the shoreline of Hood Canal has important implications for wildlife migration across the project area. Tribal members depend on the regions dwindling deer populations for sustenance. Disease, road kill, and excessive white recreational harvest have reduced local deer herds and threaten the Tribesi harvest rights. In addition, the project would fragment habitat for a host of other area wildlife populations, which are less mobile and less accommodating than deer. Shoreline ecological processes n Based on preliminary design drawings, FHM has taken commendable steps to design an aggregate material loadout pier facility on the Hood Canal shoreline that is sensitive to important shoreline ecological processes. The company has located this facility off -shore, away from sensitive eelgrass beds, and in an area of apparently low landslide hazard. On the other hand, the Tribe has not yet been afforded the opportunity to review FHM environmental conditions reports (marine resources, geotechnical, wetlands, and habitat management reports) so we remain unconvinced that various shoreline ecological functions and processes would be adequately protected. The area serves as critical habitat for two species of ESA -listed salmon species (Puget Sound chinook and Hood Canal summer chum) as well as a variety of other fish, shellfish, and bird populations n the potential disruption of natural shoreline erosion and transport processes has immediate consequences on the habitat for these species. At first view, the SEIS list of Jefferson DCD staff -recommended mitigation measures for the Fred Hill Materials MRL designation appears to offer some substantive environmental safeguards (p. 2-40 and 41). However, based on our review of the development code these measures do not go beyond what is already required under the Jefferson County UDC. A project of this magnitude necessitates mitigation measures that go beyond the basic requirements of the UDC, and we suggest that the MRL designation process is one such opportunity for the County to condition this development to avoid future environmental impacts and community conflicts. Based on official meeting notes and an April 25, 2002 letter to Jefferson DCD from FHM counsel James C. Tracy, we understand that the full MRL designation may ultimately include up to 20,000-40,000 acres of Pope Resources commercial forestland. Phased review is allowed under SEPA under limited circumstances (WAC 197-11-060(5)), however Jefferson County is required to state that it is using this approach and that there is the possibility of future MRL expansion (and how much potential additional lands would be so designated). Otherwise, it is difficult to see how the County is not in violation of SEPA-prohibited piece -meal incremental permitting on this project. 2. Brinnon Subarea Plan (BSP) amendment n Jefferson County has invested significant resources in the Brinnon Subarea Planning process in an effort to assist this local community with economic development opportunities. The Tribe supports the Countyis efforts to alleviate poverty and unemployment in a community that is also home to many of our Tribal members. However, there remain significant unresolved issues associated with the BSP, and the Brinnon community is still deeply divided over certain provisions of the plan. Chief among these issues is the recommendation for the development of a Master Planned Resort (MPR) at Black Point. The development of a MPR at Black Point potentially puts at risk numerous Tribal natural resources and values. In previous correspondence and testimony, we requested that the County complete a full EIS before proceeding with plans to develop a Black Point MPR, or even the adoption of a document that recommends MPR development. The Tribesi concern is that such a document would bias Jefferson DCD staff towards MPR development even though no comprehensive analysis of environmental constraints at Black Point has yet been completed. Unfortunately, the DSEIS contains little substantive analysis of the environmental conditions and constraints at Black Point that limit potential MPR development. Most of the Tribesi concerns outlined in our December 21, 2001 letter to the Commissioners remain outstanding: unstable slopes protection, fish and wildlife habitat protection, water limitations, and protection of Tribal shellfish areas. Within the 137 -page 2002 comp plan amendment DSEIS there is a mere one-page discussion of these concerns and little is resolved, though it does recognize that supplemental environmental analysis is needed. Nonetheless, the Black Point MPR recommendation remains an integral part of the Brinnon Subarea Plan, which is recommended for adoption as a comp plan amendment. The Tribe feels that even a recommendation for the creation of an MPR at Black Point is premature and unwarranted at this time given that many of the environmental site constraints remain unknown and unquantified. We suggest that Jefferson County modify the BSP prior to adoption to remove language recommending development of a Black Point MPR. We look forward to fruitful discussions of these matters with Jefferson County staff and other interested parties. Sincerely, Ronald G. Charles Tribal Chair CC: Lower Elwha SiKlallam Tribe Jamestown SiKlallam Tribe Skokomish Tribe Point No Point Treaty Council Jefferson Co. Natural Resources Dept. WA Dept. of Natural Resources WA Dept. of Ecology WA Dept. of Fish and Wildlife U.S. Army Corp of Engineers National Marine Fisheries Service cc-. 'DcD 1�t\f IkNc(- ,�1SSAP CO NTy �1 Chris Endresen DISTRICT 1 Jan Angel DISTRICT 2 Tim Botkin DISTRICT 3 Malcolm Fleming County Administrator KITSAP COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS October 24, 2002 Jefferson County Commissioners P.O. Box 1220 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Dear Commissioners: The Kitsap County Board of Commissioners has been receiving an overwhelming number of phone calls, letters, and email messages from citizens who are very concerned with Jefferson County's Comp Plan Amendment MLA09-235. They have urged me to express their concerns to you. I recognize that you have not yet voted on this amendment. I also recognize that even should you choose to approve the amendment, Fred Hill Materials would still need to apply for a permit and additional mining permits. That said, should the project go forward, many residents of Kitsap County are concerned with the negative impact it will surely have on the safety, transportation, and environmental health of the Hood Canal. Please consider the logical long-term consequences of any amendment and subsequent permits. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, ,s 'Chris Endresen Commissioner, District 1 CE: ac &com\data\teresa\lettersQ002\Endresen. Chris Jefferson Co. 614 Division Street. MS -4 • Part Orcnaro. Wasnington 38366-4676 • (360) 33'-7146 • FAX (360) 337-1632 Emaic commissioner(cfco.kitsao.wa.us • From Olaila 1253) 851-4147 • 6ainanage Isiana (206) 842-2061 Holly Anderson, Clerk of the Board e.� RESOLUTION WHEREAS Fred Hill Materials is proposing a vastly expanded mining operation in Jefferson County; WHEREAS Fred Hill Materials requests to the County Commissioners for a Mineral Resource Land (MRL) overlay designation have changed over time, the scope and impact of the mining project remains the same; WHEREAS the project presents significant detrimental impacts to the environment and the local economy; WHEREAS there is no demonstrated need or benefit to Jefferson County and its citizens; WHEREAS if approved, this project would be the first step in the industrialization of the Hood Canal and runs directly counter to the landmark 1976 decision of the Shorelines Hearings Board that rejected a smaller, but similar project at the mouth of the Hama Hama River in Mason County. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Jefferson County Democrats and Central Committee strongly declares its opposition to the Fred Hill Materials "Pit to Pier" Hood Canal mining proposal and the MRL that enables it. SUPPORTING INFORMATION THE MINERAL RESOURCE OVERLAY Fred Hill Materials (FHM) is asking the Jefferson County Commissioners to approved a Mineral Resource Land (MRL) overlay designation that, effectively, creates a mining district. While the MRL is currently reduced in size to 690 acres, the number of acres FHM states it will mine (400 to 800 acres) has not changed. The scope and impact of mining remains the same. This is a nearly 500 percent increase in mining area, compared to the 20 year old Shine Pit. If fully permitted, it would be the largest gravel pit in Washington. The County Planning Commission has recommended approval of the MRL. However, a minority report is expected to highlight a very different perspective. THE PROJECT Fred Hill Materials plans to vastly increase strip mining in the Shine-Thorndyke area and construct a 4 mile -long conveyor belt, a pier 1100 feet and 8 stories high and a 900 foot moorage in Hood Canal. They plan to remove gravel at the rate of 60,000 tons a day for the next 80 years. FHM states they can load 6,000 tons of gravel an hour onto ocean going ships and barges. Ships will be capable of carrying up to 60,000 tons of aggregate. Barges will be able to carry up to 20,000 tons. FHM has said that up to 20 additional bridge openings a month may be required for the ships. They also claim that all barge traffic will pass under the eastern high rise. This is highly debatable. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS Massive strip mining will damage the area's fragile ecosystem. It will endanger eagles, heron, salmon spawning areas and shellfish. The topography will be altered, leading to unnatural runoff patterns causing erosion and threatening underlying aquifers. It will take many decades to grow and harvest commercial timber after strip mining is complete. The four mile long conveyor belt will interfere with wild life corridors and threaten wetlands that are natural wildlife habitats. Opening Hood Canal to ship and barge traffic invites pollution and endangers fish and wildlife along our shores. Potential oil spills in Hood Canal will be devastating due to the shoreline, highly stratified waters, and slow flushing rate of canal waters. Ships will carry invasive species in their bilge tanks, ballast tanks and on their bottoms; threatening our native sea life. ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS Up to 20 additional Hood Canal bridge openings a month, will cause increased traffic delays and will adversely impact business and tourism on the entire Olympic Peninsula. A single barge -bridge accident would be disastrous and would sever our link to essential goods and services for months or years. According to the Washington Department of Revenue, mined materials are taxed at the point of delivery therefore there are no revenue benefits to Jefferson County. Reduced property values associated with large scale mining and destruction of the Hood Canal environment will lead to lost county revenues. FHM estimates there will be 30 additional jobs but do not account for jobs lost when the Port Townsend mine is closed or possible automation, such as the Glacier Northwest Dupont mine where new jobs were reduced to 2. FHM's past record of reclamation of strip mined areas is documented as inadequate and is poorly monitored by the Department of Natural Resources which is responsible for oversight. False or misleading claims are documented in State records Mined materials will be shipped out of the county and possibly out of the country, depleting local resources. The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan requires that the amount and long term significance of aggregate that is needed to meet the demand of Jefferson County's projected population must be defined. We need to preserve our resources for our future needs. BOTTOM LINE Fred Hill Materials will profit and Jefferson County will pay. Page 1 of 1 John Fabian From: Leslie Locke <Ilocke@co.jefferson.wa.us> To: Al Scalf <ascalf@co.jefferson.wa.us>; Cheryl Halvorson <chalvorson@co.jefferson.wa.us>; Fred Hill Materials (E-mail 2) <shinepit@fredhillmaterials.com>; Fred Hill Materials (E-mail) <jctesq@aol.com>; Hood Canal Coalition (E-mail) <fabianj@olympus.net> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:15 AM Subject: FW Fred Hill mineral overlay project >---------- > From: Kristine DeWeese[SMTP:PEARLS@OLYPEN.COM] > Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 10:01:24 PM > To: Dan Titterness > Subject: Fred Hill mineral overlay project > Auto forwarded by a Rule Dear Jefferson County Commissioners: The Green Parry of Jefferson County strongly opposes the Fred Hill mineral overlay project. We believe that everything about this project is detrimental to the social and environmental health of Jefferson County. We are especially concerned about the environmental degradation from strip mining and the increased bridge and road traffic. We ask you to deny the permit. Thank you. Bob DeWeese, JeffCo Greens County Coordinator 11/2 0/1 02 . Dal) PIM f7 /I.4.6,Z September 23, 2002 Jefferson County Planning Commission 621 Sheridan Street Pt. Townsend, Washington 98368 To the Planning Commission: I am writing this letter on behalf of shellfish growers in your county who stand to be impacted by the Fred Hill gravel project. Shellfish farming, as you know, is a preferred and dependent use of the shoreline and growers are entirely dependent upon pristine water quality to grow and harvest their shellfish. Shellfish farming represents one of the few living wage jobs still found in rural communities, as well as the production of safe, wholesome, domestically produced food. It is and should be recognized as a critical resource in Jefferson County. Here in Washington State we've lost 29% of our shellfish growing areas to pollution caused by development along our shorelines since 1985. Given the huge trade deficit the already exists for seafood, and that Washington is the largest producer of farmed shellfish in the nation, neither our country or our state can not afford to lose any more ground to inappropriate development. As you consider the Fred Hill proposal before you we strongly urge you to consider the best available science and any potential environmental impacts this project may cause. We would also appreciate being kept apprised of the situation should this process be allowed to proceed. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Robin Downey Executive Director -� f sl. i/ li� 4 cz : 1 Page 1 of 2 John Fabian From: Robin Downey <RobinDowney @pcsga.org> To: John Fabian <fabianj@oly mpus. net> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 2:23 PM Attach: PRODUCTION STATS incl metric.doc Subject: Re: Question I've attached our production figures that break out the values for each state. Although not specified here, Willapa and Grays Harbor (the coast) make up roughly 55% of the oyster production for Washington, with Puget Sound making up the remainder of oysters and virtually all the other shellfish. I do not have data that breaks this information out in more detail, so I can't tell you what the Hood Canal production figures would be, although as you might imagine it is a significant portion of Puget Sound, at least if you look at the total number of certified companies along the canal. Unfortunately production data is extremely difficult to come by. There is no single good source for this. WDFW is charged with keeping track of wild harvest, but virtually all our commercial harvest these days is cultivated, and no system is in place to keep track of this. My figures come from the Western Regional Aquaculture Center, through U.W., as compiled by Dr. Ken Chew and Derrick Toba, and I have taken their extrapolations and compared to some of our larger companies to assess production rates from year to year. I am comfortable based on all my cross references that the figures I am providing are the closest thing to reality that exists. Good luck. Robin Robin Downey Executive Director Pacific Coast Shellfish Growers Association 120 State Ave NE #142 Olympia, WA 98501 360-754-2744 Fax: 360-754-2743 Web: www.pgWa.org ----- Original Message ----- From: John Fabian ----------- To: RobinDowne�@pcsga org Cc: ConnieSmith pcsga_org Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 1:53 PM Subject: Question Robin In preparing for our 12/5/02 public hearing on the Fred Hill pit -to -pier project, we are trying to show the risk to other commercial activities if we let a gravel company destroy the waters of Hood Canal. Can you tell me the approximate annual value of commercial shell fish taken from Hood Canal? The state of Washington? The west coast? Many thanks. John Fabian 1212/02 Pacific Coast Shellfish Growers Association Shellfish production on the West Coast In Washington: OYSTERS: CLAMS: MUSSELS: TOTAL: 77 million pounds 7 million pounds 1.5 million pounds 85.5million pounds $57.75 million $14 million $1.73 million 73.48 million In California: OYSTERS: CLAMS: MUSSELS: TOTAL: 10 million pounds 6,000 pounds 600,000 pounds 10.6 million pounds $7.5 million $12,000 $1.05 million $8.56 million In Oregon: OYSTERS: CLAMS: MUSSELS: TOTAL: 5 million pounds No Record No Record 5 million pounds $3.75 million $3.75 million In Alaska: OYSTERS: CLAMS: MUSSELS: TOTAL: 574,000 pounds 10,000 pounds 10,000 pounds 594,000 pounds $430,500 $25,000 $24,500 $480,000 OYSTERS: 92,574,000 pounds 41,982 metric tons $69,430,000 Total: CLAMS: 7,016,000 pounds 3,182 metric tons $14,037,000 MUSSELS: 2,110,000 pounds 957 metric tons $2,804,500 TOTAL: 101,694,000 pounds 46,121 metric tons $86,270,000 SOURCES of INFORMATION: Western Regional Aquaculture Center (Dr. Kenneth Chew, Derrick Toba); Department of Commerce; Washington State Department of Fisheries; California Aquaculture Association. Figures represent projections for the Year 2000, based upon production levels and growth since 1988. *Commercial Geoduck production (cultivated, not wild harvest) is a new and growing business in Washington. Geoducks command a high price, particularly in Asian markets, from $10 - $15 per pound. Unfortunately, no production figures are available yet. Sept. 30, 2002 Jefferson County Planning Commissioner 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, Wa 98368 Dear Planning Commissioners, I am writing this letter urging you to oppose the Shine Gravel Pit and docking facility on Hood Canal, Washington. For the last 20 years I have been farming clams and oysters at Seabeck, Hood Canal. As you know, excellent water quality is required for aquaculture. Clean seawater for aquaculture is a valuable yet disappearing resource. It's hard to imagine that people like you are considering a plan that would trade the resource of clean Hood Canal seawater for the resource of dirt and gravel at Shine. Shellfish growers stand to lose growing areas in Hood Canal if water quality is degraded. Beneath the northern entrance of Hood Canal lies a shallow sill which restricts the seawater exchange between Hood Canal and the ocean. Pollution from oil spills associated with the Shine Gravel Pit, and the introduction of invasive species transported by ballast water, could have long lasting impacts since the waters of Hood Canal have a slow flushing rate. And considering the long-range scope of the proposed Shine Gravel Pit, where oil and invasive species are being added week after week for decades, this slow flushing rate of Hood Canal would ensure that the cumulative effect of these pollutants would be retained in Hood Canal. The Hood Canal seawater quality resource would be compromised or traded away for the Hood Canal resource of dirt and gravel. In order to protect Hood Canal's valuable resource of clean seawater, I encourage the Jefferson County Planning Commission to oppose the Shine Gravel Pit and docking facility. Sincerely, Jon Day Seabeck Shellfish Farm 8620 Misery Pt Rd Seabeck, Wa 98380 360-830-4674 Baywater Inc. 15425 Smoland Lane Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 September 30, 2002 Jefferson County Planning Commission 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 To the Planning Commission: I am writing this letter as a shellfish grower operating on Thorndyke Bay, Hood Canal with concerns over the Fred Hill proposal to mine and transport gravel on the Toandos Peninsula. I am also a marine biologist with a Ph.D in Fisheries with expertise in near shore marine and estuarine ecology. I wanted to take this opportunity to discuss my concerns with the Fred Hill Materials (FHM) proposal to mine and transport gravel, and how I believe there are fundamental problems with this project from the perspective of maintaining a viable shellfish farm within a relatively pristine estuary such as Thorndyke Bay. I am also commenting briefly on my concerns about this project from the perspective of a marine scientist. From the outset, I wish to strongly state that my concerns are not due to a NIMBY knee-jerk reaction to any proposal for development in the area. I am a business owner and recognize that growth is inevitable in the region, and I also recognize that many people, for example, may not like to see shellfish farms in their back yard. I am sensitive to the NIMBY charge, and am sincerely attempting to frame my concerns about this proposed project on the basis of sound science and environmental policy. As a shellfish grower, I own approximately 0.5 mile of intertidal property on the north side of Thorndyke Bay. We have farmed Pacific oysters and manila clams for about ten years now. From the time we obtained permits to farm clams and oysters from Jefferson County, WA State and the US Army COE, and US Fish and Wildlife Service, we have maintained a viable operation on the bay. As you know, shellfish farming is a preferred and dependent use of the water and my ability to farm shellfish is absolutely dependent on pristine water quality. I have provided full and part time employment to the local area, and we are producing a sustainable, healthful product. I am concerned that my shellfish operation will be significantly compromised at some point by the presence of ships, barges and the associated pollution and infrastructure being proposed by FHM to support their gravel mining operation. I am aware that FHM has conducted some biological studies to support their contention that the pier and shipping traffic will have few impacts. From the perspective of a shellfish farmer running, however I have the following specific concerns: The proposal to utilize large barges and ships to transport gravel out of the Hood Canal will inevitably generate fuel and exhaust based oil pollution. Incoming tides can transport a portion of that pollution into Thorndyke Bay and potentially impact the quality of our shellfish. FHM and Jefferson County would naturally be held entirely responsible for any degradation in water quality that will accompany the likely and chronic release of exhaust -based pollution from diesel engines from either large ships or tugs tending gravel barges. Please bear in mind that this kind of low- level pollution is an inevitable component of exhaust generated by diesel engines, and is usually accepted as a part of the environmental "cost" of progress, and in many locales where large shipping operations are maintained such as urban areas (e.g. Seattle), this component of environmental degradation may well be an acceptable component of progress. The problem is that the pristine nature of Thomdyke Bay and the reliance of shellfish farming on pristine water quality may be fundamentally incompatible with the proposed FHM operation and the generation of chronic, low-level oil-based pollution. Jefferson County has a responsibility to uphold the maintenance of water quality in Hood Canal for the public including viable, water dependent businesses such as shellfish farms. This project cannot rationally be viewed by Jefferson County planners as positive and constructive to the continued maintenance of high water quality in Hood Canal. I hope you are aware that the Washington State Department of Health considers the water quality of Thomdyke Bay as a baseline for measuring the relative condition of estuarine water quality statewide. The proximity of my farm is simply too close and the likelihood of chronic, low level oil-based pollution too great for there to be a compatibility between the two kinds of operations. I urge the Planning Commission to consider the best available science and any potential impacts this proposal will have on the current pristine water quality in the area prior to making any decision about this specific proposal. 2. The second specific concern I have with the project is the location of the proposed pier. I have significant concerns that shipping traffic exposed to a 13 -mile fetch between Hazel Point to the south and Thomdyke Bay during winter storms (with prevailing southerly winds) will result in an accident resulting in a significant release of oil and other pollution to Hood Canal. The close proximity of the proposed pier to shallow sandbars (including shellfish beds) would seemingly preclude this area from accommodating a pier of this magnitude with an adequate margin of safety with respect to the risk of shoreline damage. I hope that the proposed location of the pier is again considered by the Planning Commission to be based on sound science given the proposed level of barge, tug and ship traffic, and the sea (wind and tide) conditions in this area during the winter. As a shellfish farmer operating for the last decade in Thomdyke Bay, the long-term viability of my farm is very important to me, and I am concerned that this project may compromise that viability due to a shipping disaster in the area. Large-scale gravel loading and commercial ship traffic is not a current feature of Hood Canal, and I question the navigational safety of siting this operation at its proposed location. 3 From the perspective of a shellfish farmer and business owner in Jefferson County, the increased use of the Hood Canal bridge by shipping would be both very inconvenient and time consuming. As a commuter who uses the bridge daily, I am strongly opposed to the project on the basis of proposed increased waits during bridge openings, as well as possible damage to the bridge and closure by shipping traffic either by opening or closing more often than is the current practice, or outright damage to the bridge by collision. Closure of the bridge due to damage from commercial ship traffic would be completely unacceptable. The fetch between Hazel Point to the south and the Hood Canal Bridge is approximately 17 miles. With strong southerly winds a feature of Hood Canal in the late fall through early spring months, I believe that damage to the bridge from either increased openings during windy periods or outright damage from ships or barges under tow possibly hitting the bridge is inevitable, or at the very least represents an unacceptable level of risk to the public's use of the bridge. There could be possible national security issues involved as well if the bridge is damaged and Trident subs are prevented from entering or exiting the Hood Canal. In either case, the FHM project as proposed is too large in scope, the location they propose to load gravel too exposed to the south and the risks associated with increased use of the Hood Canal Bridge too great for the specific benefits to FHM afforded by this proposed operation. The proposed project will generate a level of activity and risk of pollution that I feel is out -of -scale with the geographical area. I urge the Planning Commission to consider these risks prior to making any decisions regarding this proposed project. From the perspective of a marine biologist, I have additional concerns about this proposed project that I would like to briefly outline. Increased siltation due to pier construction and chronic prop -wash will likely degrade nearby eelgrass meadows and the plants and animals that depend on eelgrass beds for survival. Thomdyke Bay supports a healthy Dungeness crab population that depends on eelgrass meadows for habitat. Resident salmon (blackmouth), cutthroat trout and migratory coho and chum salmon all utilize the bay's shorelines for migration and forage. The proximity of the proposed pier and associated ship traffic proposed is poorly sited with its proposed location at the entrance to the bay in deep water grading into shallow eelgrass meadows. I recognize that the pier is proposed to be constructed to avoid impacting migratory salmon (including endangered salmonid species), but these proposed activities will additionally require extensive lighting and noise at night to support the proposed activities, as well as navigation. I don't believe that the project adequately safeguards against chronic, low level impacts to migratory fish habitat to preclude damage. I have also observed on occasion use of the specific site by marbled murellets foraging for baitfish. Other resident and migratory sea birds using the bay regularly include widgeon and teal, sandpipers, black brandt, loons, extensive rafts of seaducks including white winged scoters among others. Bald eagles and ospreys maintain nesting habitat in Thomdyke Bay. Marbled murellets have declined by 97% in Washington State, and I am concerned about potential marine habitat loss due to this project. Again, I simply urge the Jefferson County Planning Commission to consider the best available science in making their decisions to preclude any potential environmental impacts including habitat loss or degradation to this valuable, highly pristine estuary. I urge you to carefully consult with State and Federal biologists who are charged with safe guarding fish and wildlife, and their habitat in our waters. Please consider their recommendations in your deliberation over this proposal. I would also like to be appraised of your deliberations during this process. Thank you for your consideration of these comments. Sincerely, Jonathan P. Davis, Ph.D. (Copy sent in the mail) Page 1 of 1 John Fabian From: John Fabian <fabianj@olympus.net> To: Larry Mayes <mayes@olympus.net>; Melissa Arias <marias@winstarmail.com>; <joel@gsminc.com>; mharrison <harizon@tscnet.com>; Mickey Gendler <gendler@winstarmail.com>; David Marriott <dmarriott@gsminc.com>; <donna4fish@aol.com> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:52 PM Subject: Nice Endorsement Note this letter to the County Commissioners from the Executive Director of Olympic Peninsula Travel Association. Now it looks more like an economic, as well as, an environmental issue. From: Don Cape To: jeffbocc@cojefferson_wa us Cc: dan@youra.com Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 11:02 AM Subject: MLA02 and ZON 02-0049 Dear Commissioners: We totally agree with the arguments made against this Fred Hill and Pope Resources project by the case presented in the web site www.hoodcanalcoal.ition.org. We have been promoting tourism on the Olympic Peninsula since 1932 and represent 150 members in our organization. We strongly urge your opposition to this project. Don Cape Executive Director Olympic Peninsula Travel Association P.O. Box 1521 Port Townsend, WA 98362 9/?3/02 �id . 6-401;L Hat - September 30, 2002 Jefferson County Planning Commission Jefferson County Board of Commissioners Office of Community Development RE: MLAO 2-235 To Whom It May Concern: As the deadline looms for making a decision regarding the size of the Mineral Lands Overlay, at the now famous Fred Hill Materials mining site, I want to take the time to comment. I often represent a citizen group (Mats Mats Area Coalition) that has fought continually for 6 years the mining expansion plans of Glacier Northwest (regarding the quarry here at Mats Mats Bay). Our arguments are based on facts and logic, just as the Hood Canal Coalition's arguments are. It seems to defy logic to grant a Mineral Lands Overlay of several thousand acres to a miner who will only be mining several hundred acres. To use the "buffer argument", buffers already exist under the "Forest Lands" designation. To grant this type of designation takes all control out of the county's purview and hands it over the Department of Natural Resources and the miner. Since the county and the DNR are sharing the governmental burden on this proposal, why would Jefferson County want to give up any leverage? I know from experience that this is exactly what the miner wants - a weakened county position. The other problems with this proposal will surely be addressed in future environmental and permit proceedings. My whole community could testify to the disadvantages of having unwanted dust, noise, pollution, lights, storm water, etc. in one's midst. This story will unfold at a later date. Of course, if the Mineral Lands Overlay is kept to something logical, like 800 acres, and a new 'mining permit is sought (not just a transfer), this long community/county/state struggle may not have to occur. Thank you for considering my thoughts on this matter. Rae Belkin Mats Mats Area Coalition Coordinator 900 Olympus Blvd. Port Ludlow, WA 98365 (360) 437-9442 SHINE PLAT PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION 61 Margaret Street Port Ludlow, WA 98365 November 18, 2002 Jefferson County Commissioners 1820 Jefferson Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Gentlemen, I am writing on behalf of the Shine Plat Property Owners' Association to urge you to disapprove the proposed Mineral Resource Land Overlay for Fred Hill Materials. We are among the immediate neighbors of the Shine Pit. We, better then you, understand the false statements and misrepresentations made by Fred Hill Materials. They talk about "balance" and want you to believe that they are good neighbors. Those of us who live in the shadow of the Shine Pit know the true story is not one of balance, but of the "balance sheet". The future pit -to -pier project, which you know is a real threat, will destroy our environment and canal and create a constant risk to our bridge and businesses. The County Planning Commission has seriously erred in refusing to acknowledge the future use of the MRL that they have approved. You must not make this same mistake. The voters of Jefferson County are deeply concerned about the apparent process flaws in the Department of Community Development and the appearance of favoritism toward the developer, while ignoring citizen comments. We will be watching carefully as you make your decision. We will remember how you vote on this matter. Sincerely, Patricia Olson Shine Plat Property Owners' Association cc: Hood Canal Coalition Bridgehaven Water Curtis Thomson, Water Commission Chairman 231 North Beach Drive Port Ludlow, Washington 98365 Phone (360) 437-0752 September 24, 2002 Jefferson County Planning Commission 621 Sheridan Port Townsend, WA 98368 Re: FRED HILL MATERIALS: MLA02-235 Dear Planning Commission members: I am writing on behalf of the Bridgehaven Water Commission and wish to supplement my letter of August 15, 2002 (a copy of which is attached). The Bridgehaven Water Commission adamantly opposes the application of Fred Hill Materials to amend the Comprehensive Plan to establish a Mineral Resource Overlay District of some 6,240 acres. We echo the concerns of hundreds of local residents about the obvious environmental issues. But our more immediate and proprietary concern has to do with preserving the integrity of the two 400 foot wells and the six miles of distribution lines that currently provide 180 users a very high quality of domestic water. Following the 8/21/02 public meeting at Chimacum High School I received a phone call from Dan Baskin of Fred Hill. He acknowledged having listened to the tapes of that meeting, including my comments to you regarding our concerns. He invited me to meet their geologist and review their studies, noting that they "are very familiar with the Bridgehaven Water system". The three water commissioners met with Baskins and Brad Bickerstaff, geologist and drove 10-15 miles of trails with them, after reviewing their maps and aerial photos. They explained their plan for mining only 40-80 acres within the 6,240 acres of the proposed amendment, and explained why the aquifer that feeds our wells is safe from that activity. Our fears and concerns remain as stated before. Their assurances and explanations struck me as more like those of a candidate for political office than those of a scientist. From our perspective there are far too many "what ifs" "ifs" and "buts" with far too few assurances of the limitation of their proposed mining activity. The logic of their explanation regarding why they "will not" be mining close to our wells makes sense. But nothing in their history or the history of the permitting procedures and processes involved provide sufficient assurance of any limitation on their mining. Our concern is that, once the door is opened, anything can and may happen. Our water system presently serves 180 residential users, and is authorized up to 215. We are currently deeply involved in the planning stages of a capital improvement program that will, when implemented, increase our capacity to more than 300 residential connections. Our engineers project that need for water service within 20 years within our "service area". The State and Jefferson County Departments of Health support these planned improvements. These users will be full and part time residents whose improved properties will greatly increase the county's tax base. The sales tax revenues "projected" by Fred Hill Materials may never happen, given the position recently stated by the State Department of Revenue. It seems to us that the proposed amendment is Rely to benefit Fred Hill Materials and not many others, at a potential cost in environmental terms and damage to existing services (our water) that is far too great. We urge that the proposed amendment be denied. Very , ly yours Curtis P. Thomson Chairman, Bridgehaven Water Commission cc: County Commissioners Glen Huntingford Dan Titterness Richard Wojt Bridgehaven Water Curtis Thomson, Water Commission Chairman 231 North Beach Drive Port Ludlow, Washington 98365 Phone (360) 437-0752 August 15, 2002 Al Scalf, Director Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Re: FRED HILL MATERIALS; Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application—Mineral Resource Overlay District (FHM) Dear Mr. Scalf; As the letterhead indicates, I am the chairman of the Bridgehaven Water Commission. Allow me to explain who we are. "Bridgehaven" is an unincorporated community platted many years ago along the shores of Hood Canal where the Southerly shore of Squamish Harbor returns to the Westerly shore of Hood Canal, approximately 2 miles South of the Hood Canal Floating Bridge. There is a significant natural spit located there, and back in the 50s a private developer platted approximately 200 lots in two divisions of the Plat of Bridgehaven. Its amenities include a breakwater, a small marina and a boat canal that serve about 70 lots on the water, as well as many upland view lots. South Point Road, running south from SR 104, passes through Bridgehaven to its terminus at the old South Point Ferry dock (recently acquired by the State Department of Transportation). The water system serving this community consists of two wells, each 400' deep, a 92,000 gallon 40' high concrete storage reservoir and over 30,000 feet of distribution lines, pressure reducing stations and related distribution equipment. Several years ago Bridgehaven Water began serving users located outside the plat of Bridgehaven, and there are presently a total of 178 active user connections. We have a full time Water Manager and are presently licensed by the Department of Health for a total of 215 residential hookups (ERUs). We are presently in a pre - design engineering phase of a proposed project to build a second 40' high storage reservoir and significant upgrades to the distribution system. We project an eventual total of 350 ERUs in the next 20 years. The system is managed by a board of three commissioners appointed by the Board of Directors of Bridgehaven. That is "who we are". Now to THE POINT OF THIS LETTER We are extremely concerned that the mining activity of the FRED HILL MATERIALS company will compromise, damage or even destroy the aquifer that feeds the wells that provide our water supply. We are following with great concern the process whereby FHM seeks to amend the comprehensive plan to give some 6,240 acres a Mineral Resource Overlay designation. At a recent informal meeting at the FHM site I was advised by Dan Baskin, project manager, that the current operation is mining a vein of gravel that is in excess of 400' deep, running essentially around and past our two 400' deep wells. That was prior to the filing of their current application to amend the comprehensive plan. Our wells provide an adequate flow of very high quality water that tests sufficiently pure that no chlorination or other treatment is required. It seems rather elementary to conclude that a mining operation that is this close and even possibly as deep as the wells presents a clear and present danger to the source of that water. And given the scope of the present application, we must presume that FHM plans to mine in many areas and as deep as the resource takes them. We must then conclude that there will be many opportunities for mining operations that, through error, incomplete surveys, or worse, may puncture, contaminate, obstruct and/or divert the flow of the aquifer. In all likelihood it will then be too late for corrective action. Take away this water system and you have virtually condemned the entire residential community it serves, and maybe eliminated the potential for the anticipated 150 plus new user hook-ups we contemplate. Would FHM like to buy all of Bridgehaven, all residents along Thorndyke Road and the parcels within the service area that have not yet been developed with residences? We urge the denial of the pending application and all future applications to allow mining in the Pope Resources Thorndyke Resource Management area. Very truly yours, Curtis P. Thomson Chairman, Bridgehaven Water Commission DOD F:WM 1\1a0Cj- lr� CC EDGEWATER BEACH COMMUNITY CLUB PO BOX 1294 Poulsbo, Washington 98370 i J J November 23, 2002. Jefferson County Commissioner 1820 Jefferson Street Port Townsend, Washington 98358 Dear Board of County Commissioner, This is to advise the Jefferson County Commissioners that the Edgewater Beach Community Club supports the Hood Canal Coalition's efforts to stop the Fred Hill Material Company's expansion of the strip mine now in place. The Edgewater Beach Community Club is a community consisting of 450 residential homes with a community beach on the Hood Canal directly east across the Hood Canal from the proposed developments. Our beach club is a fully developed recreation site and is the heart of our community's identity. The view from cur beach and cur view lots looks out on the proposed Fred Hill proposed developments. The impact of a barge, pier and conveyorbelt complex will be unsightly and noisy. This development contrary to the way of life of all those who live on the canal whether Jefferson County or Kitsap County residents. We have chosen to live here to partake in the serenity and beauty of the Hood Canal. That has been what has drawn us here and is what the locality has as its greatest asset. To introduce an industrial site the likes of which that is proposed will bring noise, pollution, traffic on the canal and dangers which cannot be foreseen and is a departure from the way the area has been developed to date. Residential development and tourism has been to date the character of this area, we would like it to stay that way. The pristine beauty and character of the Hood Canal is in jeopardy with this proposed development of a strip mining operation. The Edgewater Beach Board of Directors has voted to oppose the proposed developments and expansions of the strip mine now in place. We support the Hood Canal Coalition's efforts to stop said developments. Sincerely Jerem 'Schumac er EDGEWATER BEACH COMMUNITY CLUB PO Box 1294 Poulsbo, Washington 98370 November 23, 2002 Hood Canal Coalition PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, Washington 98365 Dear Coalition, Please accept this contribution of $200 for your effort to curb the Fred Hill Materials expansion. The Edgewater Beach Community Club stand behind you and support the effort. Thanks for your efforts. Sincerely, Bill Rafferty, Director for the Edgewater Beach Cummunity Club Page 1 of 1 John Fabian From: Harry Soete <hsoete@olympus.net> To: <jeffbocc@coJefferson.wa.us> Cc: bob winslow <ribbit@tscnet.com>; LaMoyne jevne <ajevne@msn.com>; Chris & Kathey Bates <katz@starband. net> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 3:12 AM Subject: Trails End Property Owners Association Board of Directors Comments on FHM Dear Jefferson County Commissioners, We, the Board of Directors of Trails End Property Owners Association are opposed to expansion or approval of the Fred Hill Materials Shine Pit or Pit -to -Pier Project. We intend to communicate with our entire membership and keep them informed of actions and positions being taken on this issue as we feel it will adversely affect the environment, our property.. and our way of life. We urge each of you to act in the best interests of the people of this entire community, the Trails End Property Owners Association Members, Jefferson County, and reject this project. Thanks for your support. Trails End Property Owners Association Board of Directors PO Box 65262 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 President, Harry S Soete, Vice President, Lemoyne Jevney, Secretary, Kathey Bates, Treasurer, Bob Winslow, At Large, Shirley Peck 12,"4,'021 People For A Liveable Community PO Box 667 Port Townsend, WA 98368 John Fabian Hood Canal Coalition PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98368 Re: Hood Canal Coalition Dear John, September 19th, 2002 The members and supporters of People for a Liveable Community wholeheartedly and enthusiastically support the work and objectives of the Hood Canal Coalition. The bylaws of People for a Liveable Community state, in part, that our purpose is: "To promote the preservation and enhancement of... the rural character of the Olympic Peninsula... To promote broad public dialogue on planning and development issues pertinent to sustainable economic development. " We welcome the Hood Canal Coalition's voice in the ongoing effort to pursue managed growth, preservation of natural resources and development compatible with our environment. We look forward to working together toward our common goals. Sincerely,.. , i t John Lockwood For PLC Steering Committee Better Brinnon Coalition PO Box 437 Brinnon WA 98320 September 26, 2002 Hood Canal Coalition PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 Attention: Mr. John Fabian Dear Mr. Fabian: The Better Brinnon Coalition (BBC) fully supports your efforts to protect the environmental quality of the Olympic Peninsula. We are seriously concerned about the probable environmental damage that will be caused by the proposed Fred Hill Materials "Pit -to -Pier" project. This is an unwarranted expansion of mining in Jefferson County that is outside the County's adopted GMA policies. We are especially concerned about the impacts of an international industrial port within the fragile marine ecosystem of Hood Canal. The probable impacts of this project on regional transportation links and the precious rural character of Jefferson County are also significant. As you know the BBC is committed to protecting our precious natural resources while promoting quality of life and development of appropriate economic opportunities for residents of the Hood Canal region. Let us know how we can assist your efforts to educate people about this ill- conceived plan. 4Sincerely, Mark Rose Director Better Brinnon Coalition C Dei fHC� SIERRA. CLUB FOUNDED 1891 December 3, 2002 Cascade Chapter 180 Nickerson St., Suite 202 Seattle, WA 98109-1631 Phone: (206) 523-2147 www.cascadc.sierraclub.or,j Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners Jefferson County Courthouse 1820 Jefferson Street Q Port Townsend, WA 98368 y Dear Commissioners: The Sierra Club urges you to fully evaluate the environmental impacts of the proposed Fred Hill Materials project (MLA02-235) before taking any steps to amend Jefferson County's comprehensive plan to accommodate the project. The materials prepared by the Jefferson County Department of' Community Development (DCD) leave many unanswered questions regarding these impacts and a more in depth review is required to ensure that the projects very permanent environmental impacts do not outweigh the temporary benefit Fred Hill Materials may enjoy from expanding the mine. The October 25, 2002 Memo from the DCD to the Planning Commission contains large gaps in information that make it impossible to render an informed decision about the project's impacts ultimate impacts. Among those issues that have not been considered are the impacts on the area's groundwater system — whose health is critical to a healthy salmon spawning habitat — and on the aquifer used for drinking water. As you may be aware, the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Natural Resource Conservation Element lists several goals and policies which not only relate to mineral extraction, but also are of significantimportance when considering the potential environmental impacts of such a proposal. The E, and policies are: NRG 2.0 – Encourage resource-based economic activities which are compatible with environmental quality; and • NRG 9.0 – Preserve water resource quality and quantity in the regulation of mineral extraction activities. NRP 2.1 – Regulate resource-based economic activities so as to mitigate adverse impacts to the environment and adjacent properties. • NRP 2.3 – Protect the environment from cumulative adverse impacts resulting from resource management practices. In NRP 9.1 – Regulate mining operations to prevent adverse impacts to ground or surface water quality. • NRP 9.2 – Establish a preference for the protection of aquifers and recharge zones from the effects of surface mining in the event that adverse impacts cannot be avoided through best management practices. ` These goals and policies are not given their due weight in DCD's documents. It is not enough simply to pay lip service to the policies and goals without explaining how they are advanced or harmed by the proposed project. It appears that the demand for aggregate played a large part in the Planning Commission's decision. The crude estimate of demand must be balanced with the environmental harm that would come from such a massive mining project. Please remember that the goals and policies set forth above reflect Jefferson County's sage choice not to compromise the county's environmental health in order to increase mining in the county. It should also be noted that the FSEIS does not adequately address possible impacts to wetlands, and the DCD's October 2002 Memo, while acknowledging that a buffer zone would be required, does not actually discuss what potential impacts of the project will have on wetlands. Our state wetlands are shrinking by the day and that is why it is particularly important to consider impacts to wetlands as part of your deliberative process. On behalf of the nearly 26,000 Sierra Club members in Washington state, I respectfully request that you resolve these and other unanswered environmental questions before making a deciding the amend the county's comprehensive plan; too much is at stake to make anything other than a fully informed decision. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Bradford J. Axel Conservation Chair Page 1 of 1 CC Leslie Locke _.._..... _.__.... From: Richard Wojt Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:59 PM To: Leslie Locke Subject: FW: MLA02-235 From: Marie Harrison[SMTP:HARIZON@TSCNET.COM] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:55:10 PM To: David Alvarez Cc: Richard Wojt; Dan Titterness; Glen Huntingford Subject: MLA02-235 Auto forwarded by a Rule David: Hello. I understand you have advised the county commissioners that they have little choice but to approve the request for FHM Mineral Land Designation. I am curious what you base this recommendation upon. The Comp Plan clearly states the needs of Jefferson County. It never even infers that we have to provide to the world. The GMA states that the local jurisdictions should follow their adopted plans. Would you please enlighten me? I want to be an informed citizen and I can not find any validation for your recommendation. Sincerely, Marie Harrison 910 Thorndyke Road Port Ludlow, WA 98365 360-437-2800 12/9/02 2002 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT DOCKET Jefferson County, Washington Comments on FHM Proposed Mineral Land Designation Prepared by Marie Harrison Jefferson County Resident December 4, 2002 Reference Number: MLA02-235 Applicant: Fred Hill Materials, Inc. (FHM) Location: Shine area (Thorndyke Tree Farm) Commissioner Glen Huntingford V` Commissioner Richard Wort Commissioner Dan Titterness CC: Commissioner Wendi Wrinkle File MLA02-235 December 4, 2002 Dear Commissioners: I moved to Jefferson County in 1978. I worked for the Jefferson County Department of Community Development for six years. I do not consider myself or my neighbors Nimby's. I witnessed the moratorium placed on subdivisions until the Comprehensive Plan could be adopted. I witnessed the moratorium placed on cell towers until the Cell Communication Ordinance could be adopted. I helped Loren Mark as she created the proposed Shoreline Master Plan (SMP). The proposed SMP won approval through public hearings. Jefferson County has not yet adopted the proposed SMP even though it expresses the desires of the citizens of Jefferson County. This proposed Shoreline Master Plan would not allow the industrialization of Hood Canal by Fred Hill Materials. You can not ignore the desires of the citizens of Jefferson County by approving FHM proposed mineral land designation which will open the door to the pit -to -pier project of which you will have no jurisdiction or authority. As the time draws near for the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) to make their decision on the Fred Hill Material's Mineral Land Designation proposal, I have a few comments for the BOCC. There are a couple of items you must address. 1) Have the circumstances related to the proposed amendment and/or the area in which it is located substantially changed since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan? Response: Yes. Since the adoption of the Comp Plan in 1998, 294 new single family residences have been built in the Port Ludlow/Coyle Peninsula. The valuation for the 294 homes is $42,770.396. The annual taxes paid to Jefferson County from the 294 new homes is $5,561,321. This totals up to 44.9% of the new growth in Jefferson County since 1999. A graph is enclosed for your information. Please note that since the scar has appeared at the Shine Pit, new housing starts in this area have declined. 2) How does the proposed amendment reflect current widely held values of the residents of Jefferson County? Response: The residents of Jefferson County have sent hundreds of comment to the County opposing the Fred Hill Materials (FHM) mineral resource land proposed designation. Thousands of petitions have been sent to the County opposing the FHM proposed MRL designation. Our tax dollars are funding Jefferson County. I think the Jefferson County Commissioners should listen to the tax payers of Jefferson County. Lets talk jobs. Fred Hill Materials suggests they will be providing 30 new wage earning jobs. Thousands of vehicles cross the Hood Canal Bridge daily. How many of those thousand vehicles are commuters? What will happen if the Hood Canal Bridge is severed by a gravel barge? How many jobs will be lost? 30 jobs? 100 jobs? 1,000 jobs? How many Jefferson County residents will be forced to relocate to keep their wage earning jobs if the Hood Canal Bridge is severed by a gravel barge? The loss of the Hood Canal Bridge would be an economic disaster to Jefferson County. A vote to deny the FHM mineral land designation would not deprive FHM reasonable use and enjoyment of their land. It is not even their land. FHM could continue their mining operation at a scale appropriate to the needs of the local community. A vote to approve FHM mineral land designation would deprive many tax paying citizens of Jefferson County the reasonable use and enjoyment of their land. Jefferson County faces the largest and possibly the most disasters consequences from this decision. It should not be taken lightly. What is the hurry? Please take your time and make the best possible decision based on fact and public comment for the good of the citizens of Jefferson County. Please use your resources toward a more productive project such as implementation of the proposed Shoreline Master Plan. This would be for the good of the citizens of Jefferson County. I respectfully request you deny FHM request for mineral land designation. Sincerely, VWA,6�L4 , Marie Harrison 910 Thorndyke Road Port Ludlow, WA 98365 360-437-2800 P. S. Dan Baskins, please don't call, write, email or try in any way to communicate with me. Enclosures: New Housing Starts Graph Excerpts form the Comprehensive Plan Excerpts for the Unified Development Code 2 O CT 00 r- en el r -q O Facts on Formal Site -Specific Amendment Request Reference Number: MLA02-235 Applicant: Fred Hill Materials, Inc. (FHM) Location: Shine area (Thorndyke Tree Farm) Currently six (6) of the proposed parcels for MRL designation have a six year moratorium recorded against the property for non: forest uses. Planning Under Growth Management Act (RCW36.70A) ■ `... uncoordinated and unplanned growth together with a lack of common goals expressing the public's interest in the conservation and the wise use of our lands, pose a threat to the environment, sustainable economic development, and the health, safety, and high quality of life enjoyed by the residents of the state." (1-12) The central theme behind the Growth Management Act is that spontaneous and unstructured growth and development is wasteful of our natural resource base and costly to the provision of public services and facilities. By managing growth and development, the negative effects can be minimized and the benefits can be maximized. JEFFERSON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Vision Statement ■The Plan is a set of guidelines; goals, polices, and strategies to give growth and development both context and direction, aimed at promoting the best environmental, social and economic future for Jefferson County citizens. Please note the Jefferson County citizens. ■We see a future that embraces options and opportunities for all citizens to fully participate in a healthy economy and a clean environment within their local community. wThis rural quality of life is what attracts many residents and tourists to the County and is what most residents have expressed a desire to protect. (xi, 1-1) These visions have guided the creation of the Hood Canal Coalition. wThat are consistent with the protection of natural surface water flows and ground water and surface water recharge and discharge areas.$$ (3-2) Please note the Bridgehaven Community Water System is in close proximity to the proposed MRL designation. The trees capture and filter the rain supply to this aquifer recharge. 2002 Comments Staff Report & DSEIS 1 During a Pre Application meeting February 20, 2002 with Community Development Staff, Health and Human Department Staff, Fish and Wildlife Staff and Dan Baskin from Fred Hill Materials, there was a brief discussion regarding water usage. Mr. Baskins stated no water use on this project, 500 gallons a day for dust control without water rights. Dave Christianson from Health and Human Services mentioned water use, water rights, aquifer recharge capacity. Dave Christianson and Anne Shaffer from Fish & Wild Life said the EIS should look at the whole project. Nowhere in the DCD Staff Report & DSEIS do I see the water use or aquifer recharge areas addresser. Mineral Lands RBased upon the criteria provided by the Department of Natural Resources, there are three key issues that need to be addressed in the designation and conservation of mineral resource lands: E2. Defining the amount and long-term significance of aggregate that is needed to meet demand of Jefferson County's projected population; and, Please note the demand of Jefferson County. I have counted twenty (20) current mineral land designations on the Jefferson County Comprehensive Land Use Designation Map. The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan requires the county to provide construction aggregate within County jurisdiction. The plan does not require .Jefferson County to supply nationally nor globally. Conserve and preserve are consistent throughout the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. Matrix for Assessing Lands for designation as Mineral Resource Lands COMPATIBLE WITH NEARBY AREAS. Adjacent land use presently incompatible with mining (appreciable residential development within range of excessive noise, dust, blasting vibrations, etc.). NOT SUITABLE FOR DESIGNATION. Please note the proposed MRL designation is in close proximity (?f the Bridgehaven Community Club Association (200 residential lots), the Bridgehaven Community Water System, the Trails End Development, the South Point Community and the Shine Community. IMPACT OF BLASTING. Too close to existing subdivision. NOT SUITABLE FOR DESIGNATION. 2002 Comments Staff Report & DSEIS 2 Please note the proposed MRL designation is in close proximity of the Bridgehaven Community Club Association (300 residential lots), the Bridgehaven Community Water System, the Trails End Development, the South Point Community and the Shine Community. VISUAL IMPACT. Mining would destroy or create. NOT SUITABLE FOR DESIGNATION. Please refer to above scenic photo of the Shine Community, the South Point Community, the Teal Lake Community, and vistas from SR 104 and the Hood Canal Bridge. SURFACE & GROUND WATER IMPACTS. Potential adverse impacts to water resources on site. NOT SUITABLE FOR DESIGNATION. Potential adverse impacts to designated wetlands, lakes, streams, creeks, Hood Canal and aquifer recharge areas. Please note again, DCD Staff has not addressed this issue. WETLANDS IMPACTS. High quality wetlands throughout the site. NOT SUITABLE FOR DESIGNATION. Please note there have been 143 recorded species of migratory birds sited at these estuaries. SLOPES. Site located in active unstable slop area. NOT SUITABLE FOR DESIGNATION. Please note the proposed MRL designation is located in the Thorndyke Landslide Hazard Area. IMPACT OF FLOODING. Mining would cause erosion of adjacent property; could be prevented only at great expense. NOT SUITABLE FOR DESIGNATION. Please note land locked lakes within landslide hazard areas striped of vegetation could have a possible adverse impact on erosion. PLEASE NOTE SEVEN (7) OF THE 13 ELEMENTS ON THE MATRIX FOR ASSESSING LANDS FOR DESIGNA TION A S MINERAL RESOURCE LANDS FALL UNDER THE CATEGORY NOT SUITABLE FOR DESIGNATION. Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan ■The boundaries separating the Urban Growth Area, Rural Areas and Natural Resource Lands designations are intended to be long-term and unc han 1111. NLand use designations may be subject to 1>Y1_ refinements. (2-5) Please note unchanging and minor refinements, not a 6,240 gross acre designation. 2002 Comments Staff Report & DSEIS Jefferson County Shoreline Master Plan Jefferson County currently has a proposed new Shoreline Master Plan approved by the Planning Commission pending state approval. The new Shoreline Master Plan would not allow industrial uses in a Conservancy Designation in a Shoreline of State-wide Significance. SEPA Review ■SEPA handbook states "it requires local governments decisions to be consistent with their plans and that state agencies comply with locally adopted plans and regulations." •It also goes on to state: -"Review of Non project Actions" -The environmental review conducted for non project actions, such as comprehensive plans and zoning ordinances, is probably the most important review which can be done under SEPA. This is the point where decisions are made on the types of activities which will be allowed in particular areas. It is important to consider the environmental impacts when making these decisions. For example, an area which has wetlands on it may not be appropriate for future development of housing or an industrial park. -When reviewing non project actions, the responsible official must evaluate the impacts of the future activities which will be allowed in a particular area. This review should include potential impacts to the physical setting, utilities, human health, etc. which could be associated with future development." The establishment of a MRL overlay is a legislative action. I wish to remind the Planning Commission and the Jefferson County Commissioners that this is the only chance allowed the legislative body to review and comment on the future activities of this proposed MRL overlaX. Any future activities will be the responsibility of the DCD administrator and other agencies -- such as the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner and State Departments of Natural Resources and Ecology. Alberg v. King County (5341c). In this case King County won the legal right not to be, forced under the GMA to designate all mineral lands that exist. GMA board decisions have indicated that land use designations should have equal standing. The Growth Management Act does not say that we are forced to accept disproportionate mining beyond our own needs. Recommendation: Based on review of the applicable Comprehensive Plan, GMA and UDC Vision, Goals, Strategies and Policies, I respectfully request the Board of County Commissioners deny the proposed amendment. 2002 Comments Staff Report & DSEIS 4 INTRODUCTION These elements exist in a state of constant interaction and dependency. None of the component elements taken independently can be used to adequately describe rural character. It is only through the interrelationship of all three elements that a working definition can be crafted. Planning Objective II - Letting the Land Speak First Jefferson County has experienced rapid population growth over the past twenty years. In general, development has occurred primarily in the northeastern portions of the County. The Port Ludlow Master Planned Resort has been the catalyst for a significant portion of this residential growth. However, other areas such as the Quimper Peninsula and the Port Had loc k/I rondale/Kala Point vicinity have absorbed significant additional residential growth adjacent to the city limits of Port Townsend. Observed limitations to development have been topographic features, critical areas, ownership patterns, and those portions of the community which are not, and/or cannot be served by roads and/or utilities. Current development patterns were identified through the analysis of aerial photographs, Assessor's records, environmental mapping, and field inventories. Tables were prepared which illustrated the relative development density throughout the County, the type of development, and the potential for additional development. Review of these areas indicated those portions of the County which are fully "built -out," as well as identifying those areas where new development and/or infill development might occur. The results of the environmental analysis were used to identify appropriate strategies for preserving rural character while accommodating anticipated rural population growth. Planning Objective III - Enhancement of the Rural Economy The economic opportunities historically provided by the County's natural environment are no longer as abundant and/or profitable. Enhancing the local economy depends upon shifting from a primary reliance on natural resource extraction activities to more diversified economic activities that utilize the natural environment and other resources (i.e., labor pool) in new and innovative ways. The County is also encouraging businesses that may not have considered locating in the area previously. Because the nature of rural economies differs greatly from urban economies, opportunities for new growth and development are dissimilar to those found in urban environments. Because of historical growth patterns, rural areas are less likely to entertain economic development proposals that would have a major impact on the local or regional economy. However, through 1995 and 1997 amendments to the GM -A, rural areas can accommodate, within limits, new economic endeavors that contribute to the growth and evolution of a new economic base. To ensure that Jefferson County can accommodate new economic development opportunities, policies are contained within this plan which: encourage developing the necessary land base and rural infrastructure and services to accommodate modern economic activities; promote the County's natural environment as a basis of economic activities that are tourist or recreation -oriented; encourage and provide incentives for businesses to create "family wage" employment opportunities; and ensure that the County's quality of life is preserved as it is enhanced. Restructuring the local economy is a process that is dependent on both the public and private sectors. Efforts to strengthen communication and cooperation between these two sectors can provide a strong foundation upon which a more diversified and flexible economy may emerge. The Comprehensive Plan is the necessary foundation upon which this communication and cooperation will develop more fully. Jefferson Countv Comprehensive Plan 1-18 Auangt M 199R INTRODUCTION Planning Objective IV - Allocation of Land to Meet Anticipated Needs Through this Plan, Jefferson County has identified and allocated sufficient commercial and industrial land to meet future needs based on the 1997 amendments to the GMA allowing rural counties to recognize "existing areas and uses". This Plan includes strategies to ensure a land supply which is adequate to meet future economic development by inventorying available commercial and industrial lands in the Glen Cove/Tri-Area Special Study. The study will investigate the feasibility of expanded economic development in both the Glen Cove and Tri -Area. The County's land supply to accommodate projected rural residential growth is sufficient. Because the County recognizes existing legal lots of record, the County has included policies to consider for the intensification of development of some existing areas of more intensive rural residential development if environmental and health standards can be achieved. These areas constitute a relatively small proportion of the County's rural residential lands. In all other areas, the County has substantially downzoned rural residential land. Associated with ensuring adequate lands for different land uses is the need to ensure that appropriate services and infrastructure can be provided in a timely and cost effective manner. This Plan contains policies which support development where services and infrastructure exists. Planning Objective V- Continuous and Ongoing Public Involvement Opportunities for meaningful public involvement are key to successful comprehensive planning. Jefferson County is committed to bringing community leaders, interested citizens, property rights activists, environmentalists, and neighborhood groups together in a public process that resolves issues and make choices in the implementation and future amendments to developed this Comprehensive Plan. Planning Objective VI - Compliance with the Requirements of the Growth Management Act Consistency with the thirteen goals of the Growth Management Act, the decisions of the Growth Management Hearings Boards, and the County -wide Planning Policy were used as a framework to develop a comprehensive compliance strategy. PLAN OVERVIEW In order to reduce the size of the Plan, much of the background information in earlier drafts used to educate and inform the public has been relocated to separate appendices to the Final Plan. While much of the technical information has been relocated to the Appendices, the Plan, as a comprehensive policy document guiding future land use decisions, must contain sufficient detail and discussion to provide clear and reasonable interpretation of the included policies and strategies. This can only be provided through a large volume of information and analysis. For this reason and in an attempt to make the Plan more manageable, we have bound the Transportation, Utilities, and Capital Facilities Elements in a separate volume. The Final Plan provides brief narratives or abbreviated requisite background material necessary to the understanding of the goals, policies and strategies of each element. Certain Plan elements, such as Land Use/Rural, Economic Development and Housing are more detailed than others owing to the need to identify existing resources and make assumptions regarding future trends. The remaining element narratives have been reduced in size from previous drafts. I rV----- r (-,..,,...v1--. -;. D1. ]-IQ e- -t 79 1009 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING THE PLANNING FRAMEWORK How the Comprehensive Plan Works The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan provides a legally recognized framework for making decisions about land use in the unincorporated areas of Jefferson County. The Plan manages growth by directing more intensive development to appropriate areas while protecting and conserving environmentally sensitive areas and natural resource, rural, and open space lands. It is also intended to aid as both an educational and a policy implementation tool for a broad range of public and private users, including community groups, Jefferson County officials, and other government agencies. The Plan helps these users in several ways: It guides the development of community plans and implementing regulations. This Plan is the framework for other plans and regulations that govern the location and intensity of land uses throughout unincorporated Jefferson County. The Plan's policies provide the basis for updating community plans (subarea, local, and functional), for evaluating proposed changes in zoning and in reviewing proposals for development projects such as land divisions. It also indicates to the public how Jefferson County would likely review and approve changes in plans, zoning, or other regulations that apply to an area or a specific parcel. • It guides the provision of public facilities and services by integrating land use, infrastructure, and delivery of human services. The Comprehensive Plan provides the framework for decisions about public facilities and services (such as where facilities should be located to support planned growth). The Plan also directs public spending to areas where growth is targeted. • It provides regional coordination and consistency with other jurisdictional planning efforts. It is intended that other public agencies (local, regional, state, federal, and tribal), in cooperation with Jefferson County, use the Comprehensive Plan in conjunction with the County -wide Planning Policy as regional perspectives or county -wide viewpoints when other plans and growth policies are developed and when making project decisions. • It allows for citizen participation and involvement. Comprehensive planning is an evolving process which allows for periodic review and updates in response to changing community goals and vision as articulated by citizens, businesses, and interested organizations. Components of the Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan is a legal document consisting of a map or series of maps and accompanying text and goals, policies and implementation strategies that is adopted by the Board of County Commissioners to guide public and private land use decisions. A comprehensive planning program (with its conforming implementing regulations) must constantly weigh the community's financial ability to support development against its minimum population obligations and need for environmental protection. Comprehensive planning provides the public with opportunities to give direction to Jefferson County's anticipated growth. The Comprehensive Plan provides for an efficient and effective land use pattern that Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 2-1 August 28, 1998 IMPLEMENTATION Comprehensive Plan Policy Amendments Policy amendments may be initiated by the County, or by other entities, organizations, or individuals through a petition submitted on forms provided by the County and subject to fees as determined by the BOCC. The merits of proposed policy amendments shall be measured against the petition submittal requirements listed below to ensure consistency in the review and decision-making process. a. A detailed statement of what is proposed to be changed and why. b. A statement of anticipated impacts to be caused by the change, including geographic area affected and issues presented. C. A demonstration of why existing Comprehensive Plan policies should not continue to be in effect or why existing policies no longer apply. d. - A statement of how the amendment complies with the Comprehensive Plan's community vision statements, goals, policy and strategy directives. e. A statement of how functional plans and Capital Improvement Plans support the change. A statement of how the change affects implementing land use regulations (i.e., zoning) and the necessary changes to bring the implementing land use regulations into compliance with the Plan. g. A demonstration of public review of the recommended change. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments Comprehensive Plan Map amendments may be initiated by the County, or by other entities, organizations, or individuals through petitions. The boundaries separating the Urban Growth Area, Rural Areas and Natural Resource Lands designations are intended to be long-term and unchanging. Land use designations may be subject to minor refinements, but only after full public participation, notice, environmental review, and an official assessment of planning growth management indicators. Amendments must comply with the same petition submittal requirements as policy amendments (see item 2 a -g above which are incorporated herein as a -g) and the additional following items: a. A detailed statement describing how the map amendment complies with Comprehensive Plan land use designation criteria. b. Urban Growth Area boundary changes shall be supported by and dependent on population forecasts and allocated urban population distributions, existing urban densities and infill opportunities, phasing and availability of adequate services, proximity to designated natural resource lands and the presence of critical areas. Rural Areas and Natural Resource Land map designation changes shall be supported by and dependent on Growth Management Act criteria, population forecasts and allocated non -urban populations distributions, existing rural area and natural resource land densities, and/or infill opportunities. Natural Resource Land designations should also satisfy the criteria in Section 1 (f) above (WAC 365-190-040 [2][g]). Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 2-5 August 28, 1998 NATURAL RESOURCES Mineral Lands Classification and Designation of Mineral Lands Based upon the criteria provided by the Department of Natural Resources, there are three key issues that need to be addressed in the designation and conservation of mineral resource lands: 1. Classifying the types of mineral resources that are potentially significant in Jefferson County; 2. Defining the amount and long-term significance of aggregate that is needed to meet the demand of Jefferson County's projected population; and, 3. Determining how to balance a variety of land uses within mineral resource areas. Future mineral resource lands consist of areas identified with the potential for the existence of mineral resources. These areas: • appear to contain the resource, based upon the information supplied by Department of Natural Resources; • are not primarily within critical areas, for example, the 100 -year flood plain or high quality wetland areas; and, • are -at least 80 acres in size, of which one forty (40) acre parcel or two twenty (20) acre parcels are currently vacant. The criteria used to classify mineral resource lands in Jefferson County were based on the guidelines provided by the state and an analysis of local conditions. Limited geological information is available to accurately identify, evaluate, and designate mineral resources of long-term commercial significance. U.S. Geological Survey Maps and Department of Natural Resources surface mining data were reviewed by the Mineral Lands Work Group for the County to determine current and potential mineral resource lands of long-term commercial significance. Based upon this evaluation, and in conjunction with the analysis and assessment of forest resource lands, a high degree of overlap between lands devoted to growing timber and land potentially containing commercial mineral deposits was identified. Because of the amount of forest cover and geology of Jefferson County, most mineral resources are located in forest resource lands. Therefore, the inclusion of mineral extraction and primary processing as a permitted use on designated forest land will protect mineral resource lands from the encroachment of incompatible development, conserve the mineral resource land base of Jefferson County, and allow for its future utilization by the mining industry. In addition, the County has included in this strategy an action item to perform an analysis to determine the 50 -year construction aggregate supply, so as to ensure that the lands to be protected will meet the 50 -year projected demand within an economically feasible distance to the market area or areas within County jurisdiction. This satisfies the GMA requirements to not knowingly preclude opportunities for future mining and, as the lands are identified, to inform nearby property owners of the potential for future mining use of these areas in order to prevent or minimize potential conflicts. The Natural Resource Lands Element and the Interim Mineral Lands Ordinance (#09-0525-95) identify the extraction of sand, gravel, rock, and minerals as a permitted use. However, a conditional use permit through the public hearing process will be required for related activities such as rock crushing, asphalt mixing and concrete batching. Uses legally established prior to ordinance adoption (i.e., May 25, 1995) are "grandfathered" with the right to continue as existing uses. Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 4-6 Aueust 28. 1998 NATURAL RESOURCES In order to conserve the mineral resource land base that is currently being operated by the mining industry, any parcel that meets both of the following criteria has been designated as Commercial Mineral Land of Long -Term Significance in the Interim Mineral Lands Ordinance: • Is currently operating under a surface mining permit issued by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources; and, • No part of the parcel lies within one half (1/2) mile of an Interim Urban Growth Area. In this Plan, Jefferson County has designated these mineral lands as an overlay to the underlying land use designation. An overlay is used because mining operations are eventually depleted and sites are converted to other uses, and thus the Mineral Lands designation is not permanent. Upon completion of mining operations and following the reclamation of the site, it will be removed from the Mineral Land designation and will be subject to the underlying land use designation depicted on the Land Use map. The Land Use map of this Plan depicts the location of existing mining operations which currently operate under a Department of Natural Resources Surface Mining Reclamation Permit, and provides an underlying land use designation. The Mineral Lands map accompanying this element shows the parcels regulated under DNR permits, although it should be noted that the mining operations for a number of the sites do not occupy the entire parcel. The Regulatory Framework for Mineral Lands The Interim Mineral Lands Ordinance, adopted on May 25, 1995, is the current regulatory ordinance for Mineral Lands. Following Comprehensive Plan adoption, the interim ordinance will be reviewed and revised as necessary for consistency with this Plan. A final Mineral Lands Ordinance will be adopted that includes the criteria for the designation of Mineral Lands as Long -Term Commercially Significant and the process for landowners to opt -in to the designation that are contained in the interim ordinance. Once identified, lands under consideration for commercial mineral extraction must also be evaluated to assess land use compatibility, economic issues, and environmental impacts. A matrix (Table 4-3) accompanying NRP 6.2 is provided as a reference point for both the County and applicant to assess the feasibility of designating and protecting the mineral resource and should be linked to future land use decisions. Specific areas of review will include, at a minimum, the following: compatibility with neighboring land uses; noise; traffic; visual impacts; water resources, including surface water, ground water, and wetlands; soil, including erosion, slopes, flooding, and contamination; and fish and wildlife habitat. Eventually, as the mineral resource is depleted, mining sites are abandoned, or the operations discontinued for long periods of time. Reclamation of abandoned, depleted, or discontinued mines creates opportunities for new uses compatible with adjacent land uses. Reclamation reduces the dangers associated with some types of abandoned mines, improves the aesthetics of the site, and can create environmental amenities, such as lakes, ponds, wetlands, and forests. Reclamation plans are required by the Department of Natural Resources and will be considered by Jefferson County during environmental assessment of proposed mining operations. Policies in this Plan encouraging reclamation plans will be addressed through SEPA review of mining operations regulated by the Department of Natural Resources. The State Department of Natural Resources regulates mining sites of three (3) acres in size or larger. Jefferson County will establish a minimum size threshold for Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 4-7 August 28, 1998 NATURAL RESOURCES Table 4-3 Matrix for Assessing Lands for designation as Mineral Resource Lands Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 4-35 August 28, 1998 NOT SUITABLE CONSIDER FOR DESIGNATION DESIGNATION DESIGNATION FOR DESIGNATION DESIRABLE HIGHLY CRITICAL DESIGNATION DESIRABLE QUALITY OF Low grade deposit. Variable but located Deposit made Grade meets the Concrete quality. DEPOSIT near use area or economical to mine requirements for processing plant. by upgrading road construction or material. can be upgraded. SIZE OF Small deposit. Small deposit (less Medium-size Large deposit (7.5 Very large deposit DEPOSIT than 2,000 tons). deposit. million tons). (10 million tons). ACCESS More than 20 miles Distance from use Less than 10 miles Large deposit Within 5 miles of DISTANCE from use area. area is minimized of the use area; presently beyond uses area. Adjacent FROM MARKT due to access to alternative access economical hauling to highway with interstate. route available. distance to present access for trucks. use areas. Near highways: access can be provided. COMPATIBLE Adjacent land use Scattered Adjacent land Imminent No incompatible WITH NEARBY presently development within suitable for incompatible land uses existing AREAS incompatible with outer range of development and development on or likely in the mining (appreciable impacts of mining; within commuting adjacent lands. foreseeable future residential owners may not distance of use area. (adjacent land in development within object to mining. national forest, range of excessive operator's noise, dust, blasting, ownership, vibrations, etc.). agricultural land use.) IMPACT OF Noise level in Noise level in Noise at adjacent NOISE adjacent presently adjacent residential areas less developed areas undeveloped areas than 50 dB(A) due would clearly would exceed to distance or exceed standards if standards for likely topographical mining occurred. use, but use of these barrier, berm can be areas can be easily constructed easily. delayed or economical mitigation can be provided by barriers. IMPACT OF Too close to Blasting not BLASTING existing required; permanent subdivision. open space between quarry and other uses; topographical barrier between quarry and other land uses; only occasional light blasting; blasting compatible with adjacent uses. Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 4-35 August 28, 1998 NATURAL RESOURCES GOAL: NRG 7.0 Provide for mitigation of potential adverse impacts associated with mining extraction and processing operations. POLICIES: NRP 7.1 Require environmental review on all mineral lands designation requests and/or conditional use permits. OT SUITABLE CONSIDER FOR DESIGNATION DESIGNATION DESIGNATION OR t DESIGNATION DESIRABLE HIGHLY CRITICAL ESIGNATION DESIRABLE IMPACT OF Only access is local Slightly longer Alternative truck Adjacent to freeway TRUCK road through alternative route route can be built at with access to site. TRAFFIC residential area. exists. reasonable expense; alternative transportation (conveyor, etc., can be used past residential streets). VISUAL Mining would Mining activity Some activity Mining activity can Activity screened IMPACT destroy or create. cannot be screened visible from be easily screened by topography or and would residential areas, by berms and/or vegetation, or permanently alter but no permanent vegetation. appreciably reduced landscape. deterioration of by distance. landscape. SURFACE & Potential adverse Water resources on Limited water No water resources GROUND impacts to water site and can be resources on site on site. WATER resources on site avoided. and can be IMPACTS mitigated. WETLANDS High quality High quality Lower quality Wetlands can be No or minimal IMPACT wetlands wetlands only on a wetlands on site and avoided on site. wetlands on site and throughout the site portion of site and can be mitigated. of low quality. can be avoided. SLOPES Site located in Potential or Unstable slopes on Minimal slopes Level grade mining active unstable historical unstable site can be avoided. throughout the site. site with minimal slope area. slopes. slopes. BIOLOGICAL Rare and Site includes Species of Special Minor or temporary No significant IMPACT threatened/ priority wildlife Concern habitat loss of fish and biological endangered plants habitat that would located on site. wildlife habitat. resources; or animals on site. be permanently rehabilitation of site removed by mining. would replace or create habitat. IMPACT OF Mining would Mining would Mining would FLOODING cause erosion of create erosion create flood control adjacent property; hazard for roads, channel and would could be prevented bridges, and utility not damage only at great lines; however, adjacent land. expense. these structures could be strengthened at reasonable costs. GOAL: NRG 7.0 Provide for mitigation of potential adverse impacts associated with mining extraction and processing operations. POLICIES: NRP 7.1 Require environmental review on all mineral lands designation requests and/or conditional use permits. district are intended to be compatible with the rural character of Quilcene. (2) Light Industrial/Commercial (LI/C). The intent of this district is to facilitate economic development and provide for a broader range of light industrial and associated commercial activities in the Glen Cove area until the Potential Final Urban Growth Area (PFUGA) designation process for the Glen Cove area may be considered. Associated commercial activities are intended to directly serve the needs of the land use activities existing within this district. (3) Heavy Industrial (HI). The intent of this district is to facilitate economic development and regulate develop- ment of more intensive heavy industrial and manufacturing activities, including and associated with the Port Townsend Paper Mill. (4) Resource Based Industrial (RBI). This district recognizes existing forest resource-based industries in Jefferson County, in particular active sawmills and related activities. The district is intended to facilitate the continued operation of existing functional saw- mills and related resource-based industrial activities in the County. There are three (3) Resource Based Industrial site designations in Jefferson County: Gardner, Center Valley, and the West End. SECTION 3 • LAND USE DISTRICTS preserve areas of locally important agricultural lands for the production of crops or other agricultural products requiring smaller tracts of agricultural land. It is intended to preserve areas meeting the requirements of "agri- cultural lands of local significance" criteria as defined in the Compre- hensive Plan, including upland -assoc- iated aquaculture. b. Forest Resource Lands (FOR). 3. Resource Lands. This land -use class includes three main categories and several distinct c "districts." a. Agricultural Resource Lands (AG). (1) Commercial Agricultural (AG -20). The Commercial Agricultural District is to protect and preserve areas of prime agricultural soils for the continued production of commercial crops, livestock, or other agricultural products requiring large tracts of agricultural land. It is intended to preserve the open space character of the area and thereby protect the business and life- style associated with commercial agriculture and upland -associated aquaculture. (2) Local Agriculture (AG -5). The Local Agriculture District is to protect and Unified Development Code Section 3 • Land Use Districts (1) Commercial Forest (CF -80). The purpose of the Commercial Forest District is to ensure large tracts of forest iands of long-term significance are protected from incompatible uses thereby sustaining the ability of forest resource extraction activities to be maintained as a viable commercial activity. (2) Rural Forest (RF -40). The purpose of the Rural Forest District is to ensure forest lands of long-term significance are protected from incompatible uses thereby sustaining the ability of forest resource extraction activities to be maintained as a viable commercial activity, while allowing for diversity in the size of forest tracts. (3) Inholding Forest (IF). This district encompasses parcels at least 20 acres in size that are entirely surrounded by designated forest resource lands and that are not vested for development under Washington state law. Mineral Resource Lands (MRL). (1) Mineral Resource Lands Overlay District (MRL). The Mineral Resource Land District is to provide for the conservation of mineral lands of long- term commercial significance (Section 3.6.3). The intent of this district is to aid in sustaining and enhancing min- eral extraction and processing 'acti- vities of long-term commercial signi- ficance by protecting designated lands from incompatible development and to allow for the continued contribution of mineral lands to the Jefferson County economy. 4. Master Planned Resort. Per RCW 36.70A.360, a new master planned resort means a self- contained and fully integrated development with 3-3 SECTION 9 • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND GMA IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS AMENDMENT PROCESS Section Page 9.1 Amendments — Purpose and Introduction..........................................................................................................1 9.2 Annual Amendments — Consideration of Cumulative Effects.............................................................................2 9.3 Exceptions to the Annual Amendment Process...................................................................................................2 9.4 Applications for Comprehensive Plan Amendment..............................................................................................2 9.5 Compilation of Preliminary Docket.......................................................................................................................4 9.6 Review of Preliminary Docket–Adoption of Final Docket...................................................................................5 9.7 Final Docket — DCD Review and Recommendation – SEPA Review................................................................6 9.8 Final Docket— Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners Review........................................6 9.9 Amendments to GMA Implementing Regulations................................................................................................8 9.1 Amendments — Purpose and owners) on the final docket for review, no Introduction. more often than once annually; and 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Section 9 is to b. Criteria for review of the final docket by the establish procedures for amending the Jefferson Jefferson County Planning Commission and County Comprehensive Plan, defined for the the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners. This Section is also purposes of this Section as including the plan text intended to provide a process for the and/or the land use map.' The Growth Planning Commission to monitor and assess Management Act (GMA, Chapter 36.70A.RCW) the Comprehensive Plan, and based on this generally allows amendments to comprehensive review to recommend amendments (if any) plans no more often than once per year, except to the Plan as part of a standardized in emergency situations. This Section 9 is amendment process. intended to provide the following: A process whereby the county will compile and 2. Public Participation. The public participation maintain a preliminary docket of proposed process set forth in this Section 9 is intended to amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and then solicit from the public suggested amendments to select which proposed amendments will be placed on the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan for the final docket for review, no more often than once future consideration, and to provide an annually; opportunity for public comment on any proposed amendments. This is achieved by early and a. Timelines and procedures for placing formal continuous public involvement with broad applications for amendments by interested dissemination of proposals and alternatives, parties (i.e., project proponents or property opportunity for written comments, public meetings after effective notice, provisions for ' All references in this Section to the Jefferson County open discussion, information Services, and Comprehensive Plan are intended to include the consideration and response to public comments. Comprehensive Plan text, the land use map adopted 3. Planning Commission Role. The Jefferson concurrently with the Comprehensive Plan and/or sub -area County Planning Commission is an advisory body plans. that shall make recommendations to the county 2 Final approval of a major industrial development processed commissioners on all Comprehensive Plan under Section 3.8 of this Code is considered per RCW matters, including amendments to the Plan text 36.70A.365(3) to be an adopted amendment to the and land use map, implementing regulations and Comprehensive Plan land use map designating the site as sub -area plans. an urban growth area. Final approval of an application for a major industrial development shall not be considered an 4. Applicability of UDC Section 8. Amendments to amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for the purposes of the text of the Comprehensive Plan, the land use RCW 36.70A.130(2) and may be considered at any time. map, and the implementing regulations are This Section 9 does not apply. legislative, Type V decisions under Section 8 of this Code. Accordingly, all applicable provisions of that Section apply to the decision-making Unified Development Code 9-1 Section 9 • Comprehensive Plan & GMA Implementing Regulations Amendment Process Amended by Ordinance No. 02-0311-02 SECTION 9 • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & GMA IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS AMENDMENT PROCESS (2) A description of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment and any associated development pro- posals, if applicable. Formal site- specific or project -related amendments shall include plans, information and/or studies that accurately depict existing and proposed use(s) and improve- ments. Proposed site-specific or project -related Comprehensive Plan amendments that do not specify proposed use(s) and potential impacts Unified Development Code 9-2a Section 9 • Comprehensive Plan & GMA Implementing Regulations Amendment Process Amended by Ordinance No. 02-0311-02 SECTION 9 • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & GMA IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS AMENDMENT PROCESS (7) Whether inconsistencies exist between applicable. Notice of the Planning Commission the Comprehensive Plan and the GMA hearing shall be given by publication in the or the Comprehensive Plan and the county's official newspaper at least one (1) time County -wide Planning Policy for ten (10) days prior to the date of the meeting and Jefferson County. by posting a copy of the hearing notice at the 9.6 Review of Preliminary Docket — county courthouse, which shall include a Adoption of Final Docket. statement of the purpose of the hearing. 4. Board of Commissioner's Decision — 1. DCD Review of Preliminary Docket. After Adoption of Final Docket. compiling the preliminary docket, the Administrator shall review the suggested a. Review and Decision Process. By the amendments and .prepare a report concerning second regular Board of County which suggested amendments the Administrator Commissioners meeting in July of each year, believes should be placed on the final docket for the Board of County Commissioners shall consideration during the annual amendment review and consider the Planning process. In addition to addressing the need, Commission's report and recommended final urgency and appropriateness of each suggested docket at a regularly scheduled amendment, the staff report shall include, but not commissioner's meeting. The Board of be limited to, a consideration of the following: County Commissioners may adopt the Planning Commission's recommended final a. The availability of sufficient DCD staff to docket without a public hearing; however, in substantively review the suggested the event that a majority of the Board of amendments and manage the public review County Commissioners decides to add or process with available staff; and subtract suggested amendments, it shall first b. Anticipated DCD costs and budget for hold a public hearing, noticed as set forth in processing the suggested amendments. Section 9.6.3, above, which shall be held by 2. Optional Board of County Commissioners/ the first Board of County Commissioners Planning Commission Workshop. The Board meeting in August. of County Commissioners and Planning b. Final Docket — Contents. The final docket Commission may, but are not required to, hold a as adopted by the Board of County noticed joint workshop meeting to gather Commissioners shall include the following: information regarding the items on the (1) All applications for formal site-specific preliminary docket and the Administrator's report amendments timely submitted under and recommendation. If held, notice of the joint Section 9.5.3, above; workshop meeting shall be given by publication in the county's official newspaper at least one (1) (2) Any proposals for suggested time ten (10) days prior to the date of the meeting amendments which the Board of and by posting a copy of the meeting notice at County Commissioners elects to the county courthouse, which shall include a consider during the annual statement of the purpose of the joint workshop. amendment process; and 3. Planning Commission Hearing - Report and (3) When applicable, any amendments Recommendation. The Planning Commission recommended by the Planning shall hold a noticed public hearing to accept Commission during its five (5) year public comment regarding the suggested assessment of the Comprehensive amendments on the preliminary docket. Plan that the Board of County Following the hearing, the Planning Commission Commissioners elects to consider shall prepare a report and recommendation during the amendment process. identifying those suggested amendments that it is c. Effect of Final Adopted Docket. The recommending for consideration by the Board of decision of the Board of County County Commissioners during the annual Commissioners to adopt the final docket amendment process. The Planning Commission's does not constitute a decision or recommendation shall be based upon the recommendation that the substance of any perceived need, urgency and appropriateness of formal site-specific, suggested, or Planning each suggested amendment. The Planning Commission recommended amendment Commission's report and recommendation shall should be adopted. No additional also include those proposed amendments amendment proposals shall be considered resulting from the five (5) year review and by the county after adoption of the final assessment set forth in Section 9.5.4, above, as docket for that year; except for exceptions 9-4 Unified Development Code Section 9 • Comprehensive Plan & GMA Implementing Regulations Amendment Process SECTION 9 • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & GMA IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS AMENDMENT PROCESS and emergencies as set forth in Section 9.3 set forth in Section 9.5.4(b)(1) through (7), above, and county -sponsored proposals to as well as the following: amend the capital facilities element of the (1) Whether circumstances related to the Comprehensive Plan as set forth in Section proposed amendment and/or the area 9.4.1(d), above. in which it is located have substantially 9.7 Final Docket — DCD Review and changed since the adoption of the Recommendation — SEPA Review. Jefferson County Comprehensive The final docket as adopted by the Board of County Plan; Commissioners shall first be reviewed and assessed (2) Whether the assumptions upon which by DCD, and the Administrator shall prepare a staff the Jefferson County Comprehensive report and recommendation on each proposed Plan is based are no longer valid, or amendment. DCD shall also be responsible for whether new information is available conducting SEPA review of all items on the final which was not considered during the docket (see Section 8.10 of this Code). As adoption process or any annual appropriate, the Administrator shall solicit comments amendments of the Jefferson County regarding the proposed amendments from the public Comprehensive Plan; and and/or government agencies. The Administrator shall (3) Whether the proposed amendment also provide notice and opportunity for public reflects current widely held values of comment as deemed appropriate given the nature of the residents of Jefferson County. the proposed amendments and consistent with RCW 36.70A.140 and SEPA (Chapter 43.21C RCW and c. Additional Required Findings — Formal Chapter 197-11 WAC). Site -Specific Amendments. In addition to the required findings set forth in Section 9.8 Final Docket — Planning 9.8.1(b) above, in order to recommend Commission and Board of County approval of a formal site-specific proposal to Commissioners Review. amend the Comprehensive Plan, the 1. Planning Commission Review. All proposed Planning Commission must also make the amendments on the final docket shall be following findings: reviewed and assessed by the Planning (1) The proposed site-specific amendment Commission, which shall make a meets concurrency requirements for recommendation to the Board of County transportation and does not adversely Commissioners after holding at least one (1) affect adopted level of service open record public hearing. standards for other public facilities and a. Notice. The hearing before the Planning services (e.g., sheriff, fire and Commission shall be noticed by one (1) emergency medical services, parks, publication in the official newspaper of the fire flow, and general governmental county at least ten (10) days prior to the date services); of the hearing and by posting a copy of the (2) The proposed site-specific amendment notice of hearing in the Jefferson County is consistent with the goals, policies Courthouse. This notice shall include the and implementation strategies of the following: various elements of the Jefferson (1) The purpose(s) of amending and/or County Comprehensive Plan; updating the Comprehensive Plan; (3) The proposed site-specific amendment (2) The deadline for submitting comments will not result in probable significant on the amendments; and adverse impacts to the county's transportation network, capital (3) A tentative hearing schedule; facilities, utilities, parks, and continued hearings may be held by the environmental features that cannot be Planning Commission but no additional mitigated, and will not place notices need be published. uncompensated burdens upon existing b. Required Findings — Generally. For all or planned service capabilities; proposed amendments, the Planning (4) In the case of a site-specific Commission shall develop findings and amendment to the land use map, that conclusions and a recommendation which the subject parcels are physically consider the growth management indicators suitable for the requested land use designation and the anticipated land Unified Development Code 9-5 Section 9 • Comprehensive Plan & GMA Implementing Regulations Amendment Process SECTION 9 • COMPREHENSIVE PLAN & GMA IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS AMENDMENT PROCESS use development, including but not deems a change in the recommendation of limited to the following: the Planning Commission to be necessary, the change shall not be incorporated until the L Access; board conducts its own public hearing using ii. Provision of utilities; and the procedures set forth under Section 8.4.6 iii. Compatibility with existing and of this Code. The hearing shall be noticed by planned surrounding land uses; one (1) publication in the official newspaper of the county at least ten (10) days prior to (5) The proposed site-specific amendment the date of the hearing, and by posting will not create a pressure to change copies of the notice of hearing in the the land use designation of other Jefferson County Courthouse. The notice properties, unless the change of land and public hearing for proposed Compre- use designation for other properties is hensive Plan amendments may be combined in the long-term best interests of the with any notice or public hearing for county as a whole; proposed amendments to the county's (6) The proposed site-specific amendment Comprehensive Plan implementing does not materially affect the land use regulations (e.g., this Code), or for other and population growth projections that actions of the Board of County are the bases of the Comprehensive Commissioners. Plan; c. Criteria for Evaluation of Proposed Plan (7) If within an unincorporated urban Amendments. The Board of County growth area (UGA), the proposed site- Commissioners shall apply the same criteria specific amendment does not as the Planning Commission as set forth in materially affect the adequacy or Section 9.8.1(b) and (c), above, as availability of urban facilities and applicable. services to the immediate area and the d. Adoption by Ordinance. The Board of overall UGA; County Commissioners shall adopt any (8) The proposed amendment is amendments to the Jefferson County consistent with the Growth Comprehensive Plan by ordinance. This final Management Act (Chapter 36.70A action on the docket must be taken by the RCW), the County -Wide Planning second regular board meeting in December Policy for Jefferson County, any other of each year. applicable inter -jurisdictional policies e. Transmittal to State. The Administrator or agreements, and any other local, shall transmit a copy of any proposed state or federal laws. amendment of the Comprehensive Plan to d. Recommendation. The Planning the Washington State Office of Community Commission's findings and conclusions shall Development (OCD) at least sixty (60) days include a recommendation to the Board of prior to the expected date of final action by County Commissioners that the proposed the Board of County Commissioners, as amendment(s) be denied, approved, or consistent with Chapter 36.70A RCW. The approved with conditions or modifications. Administrator shall transmit a copy of any adopted Comprehensive Plan amendment to 2. Board of County Commissioners Review - OCD within ten (10) days after adoption by Appeals. the board. a. Board of County Commissioners f. Appeals. All appeals to the adoption of an Workshop. The Board of County amendment to the Jefferson County Commissioners may first review the Comprehensive Plan shall be filed with and recommendation of the Planning processed by the Western Washington Commission in a workshop meeting(s). Growth Management Hearings Board in b. Board of County Commissioners Review. accordance with the provisions of Chapter The Board of County Commissioners shall 36.70A RCW. consider the proposed amendments to the 9,9 Amendments to GMA Comprehensive Plan at a regularly Implementing Regulations. scheduled meeting. If after considering the matter at the regularly scheduled public 1. Initiation. The text of the county's adopted meeting the Board of County Commissioners Comprehensive Plan implementing regulations 9-6 Unified Development Code Section 9 • Comprehensive Plan & GMA Implementing Regulations Amendment Process Dear Commissioners - we are, once again, writing to you to appeal to your common sense and duty to protect our area for many years to come. 1. We DO NOT want any changes to the face of our Hood Canal. 2. We DO NOT want any business enterprises such as Fred Hills Materials Pit to Pier Project to scar the entrance to the Olympic Peninsula and Hood Canal. 3. We DO want you to think about the future and not just simply about a few jobs ... which will mostly end up being given to Kitsap residents - we fail to see the benefits to Jefferson County residents with that argument. 4. We DO want you to think about the potential hazards of barges, ships, and our fragile ecosystem. Opening the doors to one enterprise will invite many others - and soon we could be just like the many other ugly, smelly, and dirty ports throughout the nation. Do not fool yourselves into thinking that you can stop such "progress" once you open those doors. If all of you commissioners were born here in Washington State, then you are indeed very fortunate not to have experienced living in a major city. If you moved here from elsewhere, then please ask yourselves why you did so in the first place. Ask yourselves why so many folks living in Jefferson/Clallam counties have chosen to move here. It was not because of the economic conditions or economic opportunities. It was because we chose to live in a beautiful, peaceful, clean air, and clean waters area. Many of us made financial sacrifices to do so - and have never regretted it. We chose the aesthetics or the Olympic Peninsula and we want to keep it that way. Please vote against any proposals to destroy one of the last places of beauty and tranquility "in the lower 48". Please listen to us. Thank you, Connie & JD Gallant cC : 'jam "CC. Leslie Locke From: Richard Wojt Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:04 PM To: Leslie Locke Subject: FW: Meeting of 12/5/02 > ---------- >From: connie gallant[SMTP:CG@CONNIEGALLANT.COM] >Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:00:49 PM >To: Glen Huntingford >Cc: Deb Wirth; Richard Wojt; Wendi Wrinkle; Larry Mayes; Madelyn >Pitts; > Anne Ricker; John Fabian; Jeff Gallant; Jane Hall >Subject: Meeting of 12/5/02 >Auto forwarded by a Rule Glen - thank you for your prompt and courteous reply. At the meeting lastnight I got the impression that you considered my statements about the Constitution and Bill of Rights as mandating that you bend with the demands of the majority of your constitutents. This is not what I said nor implied. Fortunately, our founding fathers established this country as a combination of a republic and a democracy. The intent was that we'd live by laws as established by representatives of the majority. From the very beginning, those representatives were to adhere to the law while attempting to satisfy the needs of the majority. Neither law nor majority are to rule. If this premise is correct, your job as commissioner is to hear what we are saying (the majority) and attempt to satisfy our needs without violating the law. This is called politics. You were elected because we felt you could do this. Glen, unless your conscience is an issue, you really don't have a choice. Kill the pit to pier project at its infancy. Thank you for listening to all of us. Respectfully, Connie Gallant --- Glen Huntingford <ghuntingford@co.jefferson.wa.us> wrote: > Connie, I have receive many comments from people > regarding the Fred Hill project. I will do my best > to make sure everyone is heard. The Constitution, > Bill of Rights, and the laws of Jefferson County > must be applied fairly for opponents as wll as > proponents of this or any other project. I think you > would agree on this, wouldn't you? Thanks for your > very real concerns on this particular project. Glen 1 > -----Original Message----- • From: connie gallant [mailto:cg@conniegallant.com] > Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 6:44 PM > To: Lorna Delaney; Richard Wojt; Dan Titterness; > Glen Huntingford > Cc: Wendi Wrinkle; Larry Mayes; Madelyn Pitts; Anne > Ricker; Donna; John > Fabian; Jeff Gallant; Jane Hall > Subject: FHM and Magic > Dear Commissioners - with all the bad publicity that > FHM is getting about the pit to pier fiasco, do you > think the general public is trying to tell you > something? Could it be that, perhaps, the majority > of > the people are voicing their opinions as supported > by > our Constitution and Bill of Rights? > The real questions hinge on: > Are you listening? > Are you going to choose the call of the majority or > will you succumb to promises and fairy tales? > If you choose the latter, please remember that there > are no wizards to wave a magic wand to fix the > mistakes of us mere mortals ... not unless we find > Hogwarts. > Please think before you act. Thank you, > Connie Gallant > PO Box 490 > Quilcene WA 98376 2 November 05,2002 County Commissioners IL Re: Shine Pit Application After attending most of the Planning Commission's Meetings re: Shine Pit, I am now, again, stating the reasons we object to this MRL designation. At one of the meetings we heard AI Scalf intimate that there probably would not be any more public meetings at the county level and permits would be granted without any public comment if the MRL designation is granted. This project should be stopped right now. There hasn't been enough study done on this issue. This would be the largest mine in the state! It seems to us that all a large business (with 12 employees in Jefferson County) has to do is present any idea, get friendly with the planning staff and whatever they want is a done deal and to hell with the feelings of the taxpayers. The County employees and the County Commissioners should be reminded that they work for the taxpayers and the voters of this county, we the people, not just businesses that want to put in projects that will adversely impact this and future generations. We have many concerns about this project: Jobs — Apparently there are approximately 30-32 jobs to be generated by this project. Will all of these jobs go to Jefferson County taxpayers? Our thoughts: How many jobs will be lost because of this project in the tourist industry, other companies that may have relocated here that do not want to expose their employees to the amounts of dust and airborne debris generated by this action, and by present and future retirees that don't wish to have the natural beauty defaced and will take their dollars elsewhere. We will lose more than we gain. Environment — We, the taxpayers, are spending millions of dollars per year to preserve our natural resources. How do you justify allowing open pit mining in a salmon watershed area and a bald eagle nesting area, more pollution of our air from the dust and airborne debris from the mine, not to mention fumes and cancer causing chemicals from the asphalt batch plant designation that automatically comes with the MRL designation? Quality of Life: The Hood Canal Bridge is our lifeline to Kitsap County and beyond. You already have the documentation on barge/bridge accidents. They happen, especially in foggy situations. If the bridge is incapacitated due to a barge accident, who will pay for the repair? The Taxpayers of this state! Many of us must go to Kitsap County and beyond for medical care that isn't available here. What will this mean to Fred Hill Materials when a barge hits the bridge — they will be too concerned about finding an alternate way for their material to be shipped to worry about the taxpayers of Jefferson County — that is YOUR job that we elected you to do. Process — It was obvious to us at the Planning Commission meetings on the MRL designation, that the Hood Canal Coalition and other anti -pit speakers were prevented from adequately presenting their side. The chairman was rude, curt and obnoxious to the public, and to his own commission member, who was trying to get information in order to make an informed decision. FHM was permitted to make a presentation long after the public comment cut- off date of October 1, 2002, but ONLY FHM supporters were allowed to testify. A little biased and one-sided, don't you think? I realize that the Planning Commission is a volunteer group, appointed by the County Commissioners, but a little politeness and courtesy toward the public would go a long way. In closing, the Commissioners should take a good long look at what you will unleash on this county, should you vote yes on this proposal. This could be your finest hour or it could be the worst thing you could do for your political futures. Do you really want to be remembered as the Commissioner who voted yes? We hope that you will address our concerns in your deliberations. On our part, we can now look our grandchildren (who were born here) in the eye and tell them that we worked to stop this abomination. Thank you, James C. O'Brien/Dale F. O'Brien P.O. Box 1311 Port Hadlock, WA 98339 2 Kitsap Audubon Society P.O. Box 961, Poulsbo, WA 98370 Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 Dear Sir; November 14, 2002 We are strongly opposed to any development on Hood Canal. Specifically, this includes the proposed gravel mining operation with pier facilities in the Shine area suggested by Fred Hill Materials in their August 21, 2002 proposal to the Jefferson County Planning Commission. This commercial development, the largest ever proposed for Hood Canal, would forever alter this landscape. A large pier facility extending out to approximately mid -channel will be a lethal impediment to anadromous fish species returning to the canal to spawn. Some Hood Canal Salmon species are on the Endangered List. Shine Creek is a spawning site for Chum Salmon. The ocean going shipping traffic that would use this facility will bring with it all the dangers inherent with this type of operation, such as oil spills and invasive species present in bilge and ballast water. It will also endanger the Hood Canal Floating Bridge structure itself, the main traffic corridor between the Olympic and Kitsap Peninsulas. The east half of the bridge will be brand new, as it is already scheduled for replacement in 2006. Increased shipping traffic and commercial development will endanger birds and wildlife. 143 species of birds alone have been identified at the proposed site of development. A large amount of commercial shipping traffic, as well as a huge scar on the hillside, will not only be unsightly, but will be also be a distinct threat to native species. Alteration to the shoreline will be an inevitable destructive force. This will lead to depletion of fish and wildlife breeding and foraging areas, which will be their demise. We need no more attacks on the limited areas that these species have left to them for their survival. We at Kitsap Audubon Society fully support Hood Canal Coalition's efforts to stop this proposed project. Please do not allow any of this work to proceed. Thank you Sincerely, Nancy Ladenberger, President � .DOW h2- - Kitsap Audubon Society P.O. Box 961 Poulsbo, WA 98370 December 4, 2002 To the Jefferson County Commissioners, Kitsap Audubon Society strongly opposes any commercial development on Hood Canal, particularly the construction and mining operation proposed by Fred Hill Materials. This project, along with the inherent dangers brought by any increase in shipping traffic, would have a profoundly negative impact on the entire Hood Canal ecosystem. Thank you. Nancy eadenberger President Richard Anderson Conservation Co -Chairman Ronald Evans Director Kltsap Audubon Society P.O. Box 961, Poulsbo, WA 98370 Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 November 14, 2002 Dear Sir; We are strongly opposed to any develop ment on Hood Canal. Specifically, this includes the proposed gravel mining operation with pier facilities in the Shine area suggested by Fred Hill Materials in their August 21, 2002 proposal to the Jefferson County Planning Commission. This commercial development, the largest ever proposed for Hood Canal, would forever alter this landscape. A large pier facility extending out to approximately mid -channel will be a lethal impediment to anadromous fish species returning to the canal to spawn. Some Hood Canal Salmon species are on the Endangered List. Shine Creek is a spawning site for Chum Salmon. The ocean going shipping traffic that would use this facility will bring with it all the dangers inherent with this type of operation, such as oil spills and invasive species present in bilge and ballast water. It will also endanger the Hood Canal Floating Bridge structure itself, the in traffic corridor between the Olympic and Kitsap Peninsulas. The east half of the bridge will be brand new, as it is already scheduled for replacement in 2006. Increased shipping traffic and commercial development will endanger birds and wildlife. 143 species of birds alone have been identified at the proposed site of development. A large amount of commercial shipping traffic, as well as a huge scar on the hillside, will not only be unsightly, but will be also be a distinct threat to native species. Alteration to the shoreline will be an inevitable destructive force. This will lead to depletion of fish and wildlife breeding and foraging areas, which will be their demise. We need no more attacks on the limited areas that these species have left to them for their survival. We at Kitsap Audubon Society fully support Hood Canal Coalition's efforts to stop this proposed project. Please do not allow any of this work to proceed. Thank you. Sincerely, Nancy Ladenberger, President December 5, 2002 Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners 820 Jefferson Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 Gentlemen My name is Kelly Brandon. I have been an architect in this state for 30 years and I have lived and worked in the Port Ludlow area for the last two years. When my wife and I moved here in 2000 we thought we had found a part of God's Country and some of the nicest people around. Then I learned about a company that wanted to mine a huge portion of the Toandos and use our canal and our bridge as part of some insane scheme to mine gravel into the next century. Not to worry, we thought, Jefferson County. has a great Comp Plan, understands the GMA and has a good DCD planning group - they'll look out for us and reject this incredible request. But the project didn't go away. The newspapers were continually filled with FHM's grand plans. Because of our concern, we went to some of the public meetings held by the Planning Commission, and saw part of our government is action. I saw a well-meaning, under -staffed DCD group relying heavily on FHM reports and assurances in the preparation of their recommendations to the Planning Commission. There had been tons of public input to reject, so, not to worry - the Commission as a whole would likely discuss and reject the proposal. But the project still didn't go away. So I went to another Planning Commission meeting in which it became obvious that, despite serious concerns about the impacts of this proposal, they just couldn't seem to get enough information on what science was at work and how bad the effects might be. I watched in amazement as they struggled over what to do, driven by some inexplicable need to DO something NOW. Ultimately they recommended approval of a smaller MRL, but not without a tortured debate containing some pretty incoherent motions and serious objections by some of the Commission Not to worry, we thought. - this whole thing has to go before the Board of County Commissioners and they'll look out for us. Well, gentlemen, here we are. This moment is over two years in the making, and now it's up to you. You have heard thousands of citizen voters tell you this MRL and related mining project is a bad idea and I hope you are listening. Please don't make the same mistake as many rural area in this country, who wanted economic growth, saw the taking of natural resources as their only choice, and managed to log, dredge, and mine their pristine areas into wasteland. Yes we need jobs, yes we need gravel, yes this area has historically been a resource -related economy. But if you really want economic growth, if that's what's driving all this, you need to ask the tough questions about how Jefferson County wants to attract and maintain the kind of industry and tax base that will be sustainable. Now is the time to show your vision for the future and avoid committing a long-term mistake for a short-term gain. Please reject this FHM application. Thank you. C. Qrandon, AIA 1571 Th yke Road Port Ludlov4 WA 98365 Tel 360-43 -9555 Fax 360-437-9538 kbd@olympus.net PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Memo To: Jefferson County r From: Brad Biggerstaff I / CC: Fred Hill Materials Date: December 2, 2002 Re: Thorndyke Mineral Resource Area, Groundwater Addendum This addendum provides additional information regarding groundwater at the TMR (Thorndyke Mineral Resource) area. We previously provided information regarding the aggregate resource and groundwater conditions in the site area in our November 1, 2002 geotechnical summary report. The following groundwater information is provided to further address concerns expressed by the neighbors from the surrounding area. HYDROGEOLOGIC CONDITIONS Hydrogeologic conditions at the TMR and surrounding area site were evaluated by reviewing available geologic literature and previous work in the area, our observations, and data from monitoring of over 100 test pits and nineteen borings at and near the site. The test pits ranged in depth from approximately 5 to 20 feet. The borings ranged in depth from approximately 35 feet to 420 feet (to Elevations 300 to 15 feet above sea level). Observation wells were installed in the borings and have been monitored for up to 2 years. The locations of the borings/observation wells are shown on the MRL Plan View, Figure 1. As previously discussed, the soils in the region consist of (from oldest to youngest): undifferentiated pre-Vashon glacial and interglacial sediments (Double Bluff and Whidbey Formations) that are overlain by Vashon advance outwash, glacial till (hardpan) and recessional outwash sediments. During the last 13,000 years, weathering of the soils has resulted in the accumulation of alluvial silts and organic debris in localized valley floor areas near the toe of slopes. Within the TMR area, surface water occurs seasonally within Thorndyke Creek located west of the site and as perched near -surface water in localized wetland and lake areas in the east portion of the site. The near surface water is perched above accumulated silt, clay and organic materials. These materials have a low permeability and perch surface water that accumulates in these low-lying areas. These wetlands and lakes are not in direct continuity with the underlying aquifer systems. Mining will be setback from these areas. A schematic section is included as Figure 2. 0 Page 1 Based on the results of our explorations and review of mine plan, the lower mining limits will be above the nearby channel bottom elevations of Thorndyke Creek. This is illustrated in the cross sections, Figure 3 and 4. As indicated in our previous report, mining will not be conducted below the water table. Two aquifers were encountered in TRM area borings/observation wells and test pits. Water supply wells in the area typically produce water from the lower of the two aquifers encountered in the site area, or from even deeper pre-Vashon sediments, like those at the Squamish, Bridgehaven and Thorndyke community wells. The upper aquifer encountered over most of the site occurs within the Vashon outwash materials. Based on the water levels measured in the observation wells, the surface of the Vashon aquifer is at approximately Elevation 320, in the north sloping down to Elevation 150 in the south (Section 12). The seasonal fluctuation is approximately 4 feet. Wells completed in the south portion of the TMR area did not encounter this aquifer. The groundwater flow of this aquifer is to the south. We expect that this aquifer provides spring flow along portions of Thorndyke Creek and the south shoreline Hood Canal (approximately Elevation 100). The approximate extent of the Vashon aquifer and the estimated groundwater flow direction is shown on Figure 5. The pre-Vashon aquifer system encountered in the TMR area is overlain by a generally impermeable lacustrine silt/clay layer (aquitard) and is a confined aquifer. This is evidenced by water levels in Boring 14 (located near Wahl Lake) and the Fred Hill process area water well, which rose to Elevations 83 and 93 respectively (artesian condition), after well completion. This aquifer was not encountered in a deep well completed in the southeast portion of the TMR (Boring 18), indicating that this aquifer is not continuous throughout the TMR area. The wells encountering the pre-Vashon aquifer are shown on Figure 6. The Squamish, Bridgehaven and Thorndyke area wells are completed in an aquifer that is at approximately Elevation —50,an additional 100 feet or more below the pre-Vashon aquifer beneath the site. Based on our data review, the water -producing unit is the Double Bluff Formation and may or may not extend regionally. This aquifer is overlain by the generally impervious Whidbey Formation, an aquitard. The static water elevations of these wells range from approximately —10 to +30 and typically have head pressures of between 50 and 60 feet, a confined aquifer. Based on previous work completed in the area by Robinson & Noble, Inc., a 10 year capture zone for the Bridgehaven well, which is completed within this aquifer, would extend west-northwest approximately 7, 000 feet, east of the proposed TMR area. The 10 -year capture area is shown on Figure 7. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of our subsurface explorations, site reconnaissance, review of the available data and our experience, it is our opinion that the proposed TMR area will have no adverse impact to the surface or groundwater systems in the area. Mining will be incremental with segmental reclamation and replanting. Change in surface water infiltration are expected to be similar to changes that have historically occurred during timber harvesting. Mining will not extend into the groundwater table. Therefore no significant changes in groundwater flow will occur. Surface water in the TMR area will not be impacted by the proposed mining activity. The mining depth will not extend laterally to or below the nearby Thorndyke Creek channel. A minimum 200 -foot buffer has been established from Thorndyke Creek so that no mining will 0 Page 2 occur in that area. Mining will remain a minimum of 10 feet above the Vashon water table that potentially discharges to Thorndyke Creek as seeps or springs. Seasonal perched wetlands in the TMR area will not be affected by the mining activity. These localized wetlands are perched on accumulated silt/clay and organic material. Setbacks from the wetland areas will preserve these perching layers, thereby protecting the wetland environments. Lost Lake is also in a perched condition, but on glacial till (hardpan). Lost Lake is a classic kettle lake, formed in a depression in the surface of the glacial till. Kettle lakes are typically formed by a large block of glacial ice separated from the glacier during its retreat. Buffers and mining setbacks will adequately protect Lost Lake. Groundwater in the area will be protected from potential impacts from mining. Mining will remain a minimum of 10 feet above the seasonal high water table and will therefore not extend into the aquifers below the site. The observation wells completed in the area will be utilized to monitor groundwater levels prior to and during mining operations. The pre-Vashon aquifer in the TMR area is separated from the Vashon aquifer and the overlying sand and gravel soils to be mined by a thick sequence of lacustrine silty fine sand, silt and clay materials. These soils form an aquitard that restricts the downward migration of the overlying groundwater and thereby protects the underlying pre-Vashon aquifer. The still deeper aquifer that supplies water to the Squamish, Bridgehaven and Thorndyke area wells along the shoreline areas east and south of the TMR area is situated below an additional zone of impermeable silt and clay soils of the Whidbey Formation, and over two hundred feet below the proposed mining depth. The Bridgehaven wells, closest to the site, are situated more than 1.5 miles east-southeast of the mine site. In addition to the above geologic and hydrologic conditions that will preclude any significant adverse impact to the aquifer systems, mining operations at the site will be conducted in accordance with BMPs (Best Management Practices) and current regulatory requirements. The active mining area will be limited in surface area. As new areas are opened to mining, mined areas will be reclaimed and replanted in accordance with the required DNR Reclamation Permit that is required. This is encouraged through the application of the reclamation bond, which is based on the amount of disturbed area. No adverse impacts to the groundwater systems have been identified since mining began at the Shine and Thorndyke sites, somesl9years ago. Mining at the site is and will be monitored by a variety of State and Jefferson County regulatory agencies on an on-going basis. Monitoring of the existing observation wells will continue during mining at the TMR site. 0 Page 3 a t 1 r' 20D0 9 lqD0 2090 IN FEET) t inch =20001"t n �et t ` iii t ` � `: p ' ,.� ✓rft ` `P d SOUAMIS i HARM 14 % r J tint Ir-,\� '� `I • 5[�w> i s ;+r" r a , 'e 3e 47f v i. sj Y. �'�e,g tf 0, �p t + (l. ("g�'� f -'s! � \ 4�7C,,,, ',Jy '„.�� j -�••� J :i J '' S 7 ' ? r ', `fir' /1;., r V/ 13 THORME ROAD /A ff tJ ro F�}�d 3 BOTH LEGEND ?2 a 7 Yy + r _� f } 1 APRIL 2002 OCT. 2002 FW—PROPOSED AM! NOV. 2002 �; i �r PCANNBIG COIIIILSfON Ad?LAMD 4 24 ce SECTION LINE _— �' ; 1', x ” ��� ,i TEST HELL Aa . EMSTMIG CONTOUR 400 QWUNOWATERCONTOUR MRL PLAN VIEW d0 - - cN ��(APPR�o�j � ; OUTWASH CHANNELS WM B � 12/2/02 AMD MtY. AW AAu yy1�!ioxoFn BY 0LUM AE5Ma AIAN MAWr / AW PRPAAm BY raw F;rrrEnW J J_ 0 Q J H W cr O w Y J � Q J 'y D —� O Q Q a J O V) (J1 O w 0— U ry 2 (A Q F— D D O w U Q r) Q U v 2 w J W Y D ¢ W -� U cn Of O W J n J � W o J ¢ o (n J N 0 o � o pop �F N J --1 LL 0 a^ a W Z O z O= J O EC1 > Cf)> J U m W c 0 O CL 0 N _ WI n • (' �T r �1L ��Llaw4�11.�• hi��' a . ►a .. �zj��Trfewi ,4 r I��4iiti4�rt1. hi'TT�!irtt aTr R* xr4 Ni Rtib • r4Ri,4i<at. +�T����Tr♦1�N hir ��1i !f6 fan,;:...-It41?S<<1 TFC*g0.ihN ilr�X a ' MMO*I�4�i p$��`i'ONr�hi�M�44hi N. Ri' �aa�T l rKfit�i.a�i.� w�i"Mli a44R R�Ns1\y►'A*� e. St�4a'4jM,�ir`i�N•4A�'��Mt�i'Ri���4R� ■ a4�htrt. ♦'hiWA�s�?`�.r4,.hi,+.lea'+.4h t�'Nr*�1r4a.��ii �t � 4Ria nAnwk' N.4 hi,�r -AIN-11 Nr4 RiaTrl. alr�, hiaL! ki 7 W4 . ■ 1 .I o � o pop �F N J --1 LL 0 a^ a W Z O z O= J O EC1 > Cf)> J U m W c 0 O CL 0 N _ Q ■ W�g CO a^ a J O U) J � U NCC O N _ Ld 0 g IN ---------------- 4 [L' O 0 0 m O Y 44 w Z O + O O M O O + O 00 N O O + O co N O O + 0 -I N O O + O N N O O + O O N O 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 O + O 0 0 + 0 N 0 O + 0 O O O + 0 co O 0 + O O 0 0 0 O O 0 N 0 0 o O o 0 0'69C + 0 0 0 0 N i 4 O'SZC 6'LZC u i VT -vs 0'LS� Z'ZSc O + O O M O O + O 00 N O O + O co N O O + 0 -I N O O + O N N O O + O O N O 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 O + O 0 0 + 0 N 0 O + 0 O O O + 0 co O 0 + O O 0 0 0 O O 0 N 0 0 o O o 0 0'69C + 0 0 0 0 N i �����s �'�r .: 01 1 I I I I IN FEED 1) 1 Inch s2000feet Ill\KS \ `A BOUAMI3H HARBOR 4 Wells Static Elev. +13 to 30 ft. r 60 — 70 ft. Head r. 4. I Y • I_1�,��t '� ��. ��!i' a� a a.. • 1 • Ami1 h•1 I 1 1 .II / • 1 I•IF•.• a �•a rr r•ra I `'I''M fir►"` , . �`•�1"� y� v pop e ryk, /z. G .0.2- 140 6Z140 December 5, 2002 My name is Karen Best. I reside at 41 Cameron Drive, Port Ludlow. I earn my living as a Realtor listing and selling property, primarily in the Port Ludlow — Shine area. I oppose the Fred Hills Material application for the mineral overlay. As a real estate professional, I see approval of the mineral overlay as the first step to approval of their "pit to pier" project. In my professional opinion the "pit to pier project would have negative impact on property values in the area. Even now, the disclosure of the possibility is adding to the marketing time of home and properties, which lowers the marketing price of homes. Disclosure of the possibility of the pit to pier project is enough to cause many prospective Buyers to say I don't want to even look at properties in the area. Buyers simply don't want to take the chance that they would have to live near the conveyor belt or the pier. The concern is that it would dramatically change the character and beauty of the area. They also feel that it would dramatically reduce the desirability and value of their property. They don't want to see it and they don't want to hear it. Additionally, the potential of repeated or excessive closures to the Hood Canal Bridge to allow ships and barges to pass will, again in my professional opinion, affect property values not just in our area but throughout the entire Peninsula. The bridge is our lifeline. It is a link for many to jobs, life-saving health care, shopping, and more. Businesses on the Peninsula rely on shipments via the bridge. When the bridge is no longer dependable, or worse, disabled because of an accident, Buyers will not want to move to our area which will decrease the demand for property, which we all know results in lower prices for homes. As an area resident I am concerned that an expanded mining operation has the potential to compromise the aquifers in the area as well as disrupt and destroy environmentally sensitive areas. The county has a history of working to protect environmentally sensitive areas. Don't stop now. Deny the approval of the Fred Hill Materials MRL application. HOOD CANAL COALITION December 5, 2002 Commissioner Dan Tittcrness Commissioner Glen Huntington Commissioner Richard Wojt 1820 Jefferson Street Port Townsend, Washington 98368 RE: MLA02-235 Fred Hill Materials, Inc. Pit -to -Pier Project Gentlemen, J; Attached is a petition statement with 93 signatures vehemently opposing Fred Hill Materials' Pit -to -Pier Proposal. The Jefferson County citizens represent 67% of these signatures. Following is a further breakdown. 2475. JEFFERSON COUNTY: Port Townsend Port Ludlow Balance of Jefferson County CLALLAM COUNTY: KITSAP COUNTY: KING/PIERCE/SNOHOMISH COUNTIES and Balance of the State 1,058 signatures 569 signatures (67°/u) 383 signatures 176 signatures (6%) 359 signatures (12%) 359 signatures (120%) OUT OF STATE: 89 signatures (3%) If you have any further questions regarding these documents please contact Pat Olson at 360-437- Sincerely, Pat Olson/I HOOD CANAL COALITION P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 k44_* "p DeinOwm �•t• �. �� �• �' PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address ign tur =�.t J, PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will huid all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature 12,66 21 /8 X11 .sf si- P u cc u ti A V-(4 Steri-r� £ L34Ss - .2 %'L, k) S L v# -h ex Y. Iet ✓s 7-:,;o7 7&r` D-- wE M. uysvi tt'- wA g%,7 E:.a PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE of, tj E WAS CGL e., 5 o j arrw ww'V-4 go UZAM4 )z Ll�.eiC' id, <-- - Z -A Aom,qs 4 33oog /VmA � rd� Ae y1 Lz 7 ti5�a 3 •�.� .� I PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. PPrfijit:ed�Nanme Address Si ure r�c� aoeP, �T ,e— t SU,SQ n �'7 G l+o l rte, -Cr" -� yL 2Z.Lel ti"q �-r-sL I' ��az�� '� a XS-7�1 �4tr� sc�l 117 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE ej�tAj?05 t, L Q Fj?- Sr C� �4V ej! of 106ct i5i66' f�-Z Ad eA W L -If —vx (6 4, L p —(—Touuvk"i � A, e, P6 PT I- 'Let/ T --r Li 14 r - PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE Ltl )N ►) a �rjrs U n 11,40C, tt-A CIA(n E �� , I I G` tu&s�, GRANQVIEW gaP a G KEY fb�j 04 Y.5•. .fog •v'd 60" 6u o w I cz S- w y'��-:� 'le eft C/v iCHrffR,,D L/G1IgE2 rr. w,,t 5'f// 2-5-0,e Log- C l ems. o ((rite. WA. 9Z i a3 i�� PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature cc,C c� f5er/ev"Q w'4 ak d' D. l/ �s' ' Ce-a'�/, ��rq use 41 6 u'gly 4 Y44VJ Q MN PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE ' feu --ie Ct E pk-*q o V. EPU,h-7 ✓� f �aQ,� y- !'utr-�vf �•a.r! 1v.1- /'?�Jdc�l M � E F -Zei 41Y105 �a wo ��✓.� �vKpf -2�U [ v5n,4,-.�_. wl rJ� .v /Lld,vt� s A) r2AA�V L c-0 lie �11,414 -lei D 7DLU Ste) D�r►� !'�'tiaTt :ese.�. p 603 F(ct51er R,' . /t%r� la,.� d, w4 • `18359 (�t ( [2�se SF• �� u t�-c� u vt�t t cJ�� Qom t- Tv W K ►-«t i uk A Ct C 3 4 PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name I MIR I - Signature t I ` i • ,> a � rM PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE DAr JlL�z� 16 1l c" ©Z (,QJ l II\ dL X --/ 3`x'3 T�ossor� lira � r i C . ; Q Y oLu, W A 8-2,,-S'3 "^N(% V�l 0A nN(�,� 0210) �., ndc�- ,•� h m �. c�.e n �-/�svU Cwt b 6 b !2 T� 01 k e o e, WA C16-3 7� v- r--� lig 30-- �cs �d Hca AA C4 v73 &T)" — --`3 S 4 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE ,�•�lC�e � t� 7 aair retf'VOL vil.Ja., �Q.�lc�t �2E'-V� Iia i �'1 !N �Z.d Po �v►�cswNSLl" C_� Cc-�,(vv'. we r ;1 Q — 4�,07 5>*7 �c�cr ; • �/ � �.. i r� 7� � J s� v ®r-0 N ci�5� � l —C �Nf �v 64L-�2 ST�� �m5�, dc�4,7 (11 ! r � , a L-, ken b y e pt. LLCIJ ►1 `iJ 37[. �' •�� [C.L n �C Z U ly a. -ic Fr3�� 1DQvk) V'Kki viyv-�P<< (L,oc,�e Df ?ou156a 37-0 . PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE j)ou( S/6 IR191 l./4Ne Qviwovj, urf. gP376 �•��-�0�►�SG� I a c s . leloot�rol�,� A. orl9y� /7ivr�o ,eT S 1�a�6� t. Nick Q rr !.jN%/ Old Por* WIA 0 %.-- If - - - 1 G6V 4f go f 4 ?67- �JT%liGl� �d"�/ 10.,,-r AAL,�-trw (�o � � � Lo c. ✓ wR��3 d YK4 't4AZL' s'i� s�> P-- r, ,i i � jec� ►v�a-r�,�=o �t ,L�cc 1��, GiJa— (a C PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 44fu,e-2 w,4- 1�d'�LS� /"LT. CV . c c,,, t k (A S. 2 21 N &arch, -r- `06 P > (► tom ueg tic— Co t� r�nt3vS �� L13Z3a xf le ,z "L�sw OCT !✓,� % �3 �� RA oZtpt ?1,4(L AMO -JS Ct4IVVA"vvA 9Y, -714 c9 L- (►KI� t c- �. -c ejz 5 — r� r WA 3err-c P,4R.YA N N M, L #d LZ. A n, Mcur4�S Vo-, �irutl',w PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE �- a,A-�e Virg LtWy� Ile I 't �,� 1n,,,,,.,1 -��' 115 .r po b.I L17w` - '?7g0 _ J �3ci 3 S i �� so S P u i w► L -F pri— �O/K U22 5PV-mcS 24 Made s�� 4a5�i ms `hoc T u) , WA > > D -e_ -r o o r 1,111 iA/7 ����i9�7n•� ?iD /��Sf ��� ,9 9'34 q( ICU aellA l �. . %J U1� Z / C l tc w• stet w. Po 43o v. 1554-c? S &7- k- q 8 // S i PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature KQ e'en 1�• M��r 1� �� 1 /6585 d lyMpie V1,ew lU I �/erda le 9 Gt/�} �l4ot-- AO W10 q� S,Iva Ore. 60. t Ad686_ va n-A4�3 9CC�' �` ' (((� i. �O� 044 Y� vc� j i 12 o�F /��1 q ON, I( PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE �! 4 IV I14 veK ra% ev�1Tr e sr Tfoitr <v irrr / ` L!L' I 7 f i d4U* P 7 G :'Y\ LL. �kL�jp 1�C;- 9,,- , r l &E-12-1malE1,9 3,42 �ou.e2•�c,�s ,�� T nn II i a S Cec\lc_r S� Ive6 A 9 9 3 i MoLtAt'-e AJ N W 01— 1 nn �- n �t a J Q m ass /06 d' J " e 7^ 14 41 fel -4t J�5 � PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE Bes /411F� a ti �.9�93ir C ; PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature Mf 1/ Sa �' f a_gI .S. S`TAV 0 F- K A'T t.�`� St'Av N �-`1 �.S I O►—I] �'E�G."i R.a� ?oa-T 5 p c— PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE Q�r4iSe ', �i9vY9//q 77a0 AAle Vr-7W JA� Ca LD i o i r�&cr '�4 R�3 Dov- w� TO - /--Mci ciK C- (� G cL iF-whvG- /10 010 CEN ,Rd � Q�.A l CQ4,Lt uj /4 P, inoICL - X IL U (/�_ G✓ Q t G!-�• 9 .�� Ell Q PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE kv, kktl 74 wi, P91D6;F /PD �DFISAAVblri' *9F�.2 J.oREEM / cD - 9830? S 1 Fe c "� �°��+� ¢ S e,9# :Tf)e_KrJ 2'7q �rr�a. � � J o K �tra �Ir. �? d, rsdx �-r n�o•,r/�� 9 1F-'4AG 1, lonr f rlm selof A675- F—IrR 15t o�- `Tc�w •� 98 8 �. iAJ b A s A.)6 M4kJaE LAA-� w uj �v % G� �i�a✓ �Q-�Zi �' N3 76 T/ S 611^ /- Li saPQyg DG+cvvUcan 2()7 k0 tv of+ Ave. i, PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature U0rrH l oUe'- H C' �1 4"n Cooke, y 380 �.,)v�-} Z?oiZ7-yv P 7. _ ��. PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 3 � S�f�- JAW4,9 L67�'& t,C CAA(ifl�, D ! �3D2 �" %� ° rvt,4 �G.tr� I G I� L� `j ol7►r i. � / l2g2 �tc�NRa� c�-�i'T 1 tJ� (� I�a n Q i u�r e(0S L -c-. r, c o►r EO I"i,N? u s ° n eA llom Tct c a ��•,�b.. toy M,a�sa.P �' �ti��^ Fo a: v r)L--o t -.,r Mair -fle-r, fe 4 7(? of perl • Com 67 Grp ange l se ..[. %1 C // Qe -1,,kl V ! l 1 S`©u-`pvc ✓�°f�-� PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature L'Omx VQkA�_ev_S 1.C1uvJ co, 5� �l�i��. ��6 — i F --r_r-6950t4 7 u C�- Ow cl--34, 5'3 t S H WC kOAp -- _--- N ]� Iry�t�j N I } r p 20 90 6 ���� . �?�y /V e , NN a Nj �'� t X14 3- ^� Z PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Si nature _ I_;/ 70 7 6/9 Ala' E r �. f p tJ - 7 00 7`,4IQkr-A &2, - /' 1117 L YY1 " � �v � b X4 kit S POP-r- 1'� . l� f' el, D J PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE t9 o� my �?•�- , 9563iv5 Qm 00,111V �L► a �S3c� 5 �._._• i�.n : J" •L.�j�2v(P S Fe u j � Cl s 5 ("%5 14019 pilte-elol%l /0 3 / `/¢ -S-ho ec- L7r ------- `� V $3(o 5 /---� v-� c,^,% e- f (eF �-�-- re .e �3 6 5 cl .9 %�''�! W4 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE to4 ` do n 13 M0.Y(;ccL2 9 3 b `I (3e4,L A D -r -1112 PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon tl-le long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature �tiv IIL27 01 CSCk i d le_?J�4 V J 'J �J PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE k') C7� r ��; �.PS CLlse,f 'A 5' 5 UJA )c, e - L F L a/- Ao. PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature g31g wAVS low N. M 1318 k: k IV In"T Mc�tC /� '�.'GCn'zGt' int✓".-" J3 �/�` rev rcG� �P��, s, uk t46-l0a ?,L C11A , 1,A �. s c� 13& ��'..e�� �JA 4�1u7a(, PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SI UR DA4E C ACM0 W,,k Lit -25- G pww o V' 0lul or l W.4 17 0 o h - -7 6 . Acrr uo c MGN. S lA/ R bo L C WA i PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Si nature O_q 1 E 7- T -r< T G.e %hd (Att" (kS �.n c ,� �r�'o-�o--'�t O G � C PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE MtC(JA6C. AN6rzCM--r f2(z7 (fCouoY P64 c,*-) APT6201 3z� se-vt i a PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature �6c Ct ( 3 6 FI (G � 2. z Z SA r 4'I'_ �za PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE TZ"Ss Z3 5 ort �T p� D) 4C �uo - n B. M� k; 4Ae 3135 oak8OILYA� ©,- L C-0. 833 q----- po.-�t oa 9/(o 8 .. xxf PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature bo CuvL U 1/ 4, ✓, �c /v PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 3 t o D is YN gd- 1 S e I�✓i"�elo��i,s , �o( bol .e r Go X030 l Po± zAt Q fL n Circ► � o � r�, L t_._ � `� � � � � �.J ( _ .�— �) O.z -ej k,, IKi nom-�Itr—Li r 5e i I(Y1 u Ave, �P 7a09. S� 3� S Zp-Tk A, i PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. 110 I , I � ■ Ar v'. PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS N RE 1 4 �45cz� G 1 err, .���� c� f nt"A �vw rn F c��2f md'$ Nur -tuw►��r Vii, VJ�q qg��o PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature C �ar�e$ ` *aAJ �q la q b r, r.1 �. P� t-ksbo N q7�; 0 0(103 o �S3 DC b0 rah b a6 PoA kk4Pq UJB- �3 1 A NR TI ALR 5 o f �._��c,v _4 ,� PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE �Lwe,( CL►'n� I «'wee 1 i q F �;Ax <<sIG,U��.ela�er !so f t�sr� Lg,✓.e f.�'v, �rv� ���� ,� l � i Is`D;; IfeN 4N. dCuf!-C�n1z . ✓, v�.� N Q' -1 ( 1"� G-! r , ►ti 'i'91n `� •0 . l7 � �S � � � � . W a �i��j 1 ' W , (5Arert HI- P'— �L1'F_' �O v .+yCq- Po.i3 /G!'G F�o/�T To ��sr=•�» cLs9 `10"6 l,�> QIA� 1` �A- PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature OA1 �63eaeL «}4Ad 55onl 7nn'P3�X�.ati. OU PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 4& (4 e, i4.4,eZ:) AeeGv i C-7 IT) VCS Jc_ y ' �5ccl 1 i v'Cc� 12d. /GrSu v< � rC '� � Z�/ /1��c-ir c�: � . �-F. �r✓/rt,v.-C�-'�,1 .u? / Zll -Rd _ (U,�7 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 'tS4n; ��-iL' /�CJrnJ 7`/W i/`fi�/1• Srtu2c= �,2. ��� �,( ���� - _ JVCi C JFcl AiSoN �I �l` '?Juc F sy, �-- L. A/ l/-scw k/,4 34 �L/ n/ �/f / L/ P s �82 T L. vJLc� c•1 r� �!�'J(vj ��, -� I PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature lC k # A ro /✓ cI// � oG %Y( C- LCL. � i. 13 -ern v fir'/ i/ .4 AID '.2i 5 c.t IJ .9Uoi2i� -,Jr. il�gz 9// TN��W �y,�� l OAT t_UbLayl A ,/ 6d IN PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE �y PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Nanme Address Signature P44 Il!t TSN 281 S. PT 12D 'flmr SP Low, uJA, 73 � �' Po' w r &,T- L_ u Pc.a a 9�73 G 1 iLriLYitJ ll`i 6H N S MR 2 c:, A �u r 5 t I—II d t4- l c C'v Q Y 3�f JJ t Soh V T , PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE "j05AitJ Ko 7751,8'i-::�h: tie ' ' 4 -Q [}/y go 6 R ., -Z r PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and ' protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature r, J A h L 44e Al, A4 6. er'a 1d L 261 tT t X, B. C 0.n &-C PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE AR S _ sa dvvsrtv,2 �oqo Vkr Z U10 cv� "9 ln�lc� C. lV et u�cirk. a5v4i Pioneer Guy /VW poulsbc> luR 99376 �oi P���� 1 13 Go 4,r& H L/V caw 5615 YX gOA.IV(�&u -Pl�KT' LUDL-OW MA .0 01 1 IF 474 L7(�C,eT 4,-'Q'7 S N %Ve- NF a 7oU �s/3v u-4 ( ,C ✓ I TOA, 6 (�4 R���.s FiZLIV�I 513 Mc - M ; ^ VX — 1el� i6$ -Flo f o of F lo w v� s cZ ha WA (A-OU'IJ-h- 2' t .S 4- W ` (ZX . A- S544iA kje5e / air Norfh l3c-acA pr,a �o rt Luq�l d� � cJ69 6S 1 U.. F PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE .i �. sST,e ckcvcs Kl 306co $ce--.,�Dc D,c AlG- PoIL-lo qqpjs-� /a I MERRi Tt f Sr, PoAr �+ a 17 S D1 M e /01 t7 Lw d /rw 3,6o iJ� 14 Lj Pi/rt I J Vo 1A jM t, 6k. 1403 SAYWA P -.D lam( Al rtlB 00 -SWIA 4= tizl J 0,0--7 .,v L -o . j 4j.#q g3 6_5 ��// [" o n n a `I�• 1'a,� i ct /DO 15AI h e Po + lod Ad G /-�'/ /vh,- F6 R7- /- 0,D1.6 LJ 0) A. 9S3 J �1'zt n kl �' �j4YY) � � �' 1 �-{ z 2 w s r r>��"-air, S, .1u4 Johhs o h Til 1n e ori- Gxd /azv 1t136s tr Af rZ4 IJPES W A Y oa r�,OVAow PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Si nature �vt, 12oS ,�loa� 331 Tr_ '. s 0�e.� i1c, WA clg37 I3ax /a.2-/ I-le--etiv ck- 9'93 9 G,J S�. A_*_\ JfW_ cvv_-e� P&4- ,MgmAJ14 PeckpiqyiCtic� cv 193 l -'411,e6 -4 -CA -e v✓fI ✓837 C�i� /jam i w PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE r-ati N,vs5p- \\ -1-1 —\,r �.ftv�nr��✓ Sc,h�✓�l� � ,li g'36 ,G ir-�Sb- Z Fir �- -poill -poill ��i//�l �i,�'��n,✓ 6.? i /i:�./1, ,�r.�r .tip �.� la_0 - 1 / 64h D fh R v19-► 3 Y Sr 1 C4 ter• z�3 Z7 - Aum''` - �� C SG,5avr cC Sv y 1//i1/ mo ) cmj 4k R%n cel ,��,r IQ41�at---r �a 1 5o'l P'k P6 I6s 1j1 4 is rr/r c. N ml�r 2i0 `MOW5,71jd V5. rA a)-4A(ev,c- / WA - In -j(e PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE l AIL d)� 2d h h! � � i �S�'V u�►�r� �: �1�`D X55 �` �-' .�' "� C��'`� a m clo l l(C7 Iso L of PLY 1 ` t o (-I Asn N cz s poax ?ou�n�sEry %fie %1✓I/4 I rip &eyCl1✓rn.,2�J J 1 S3 A WILLIAM Woi-F 22) PoN4 RD., P.7, qS�68 Ar( Ak Nr&wj im 1300 �� �: Q ��� S� . 1 Poly o i W4 r A2 `I R-1 6 Tei -0 S� �. Fo 4 )o cu,150u WA_ (?K36 19_ lo/ PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Si nature :5 EV NAF TiCv ek r- ,! � Z'Ie�e 44f2 j 6-L i 17 VSIT �I_/N Sed 1e Oh qS PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS ams b v /Wson 1 A1C l��.tT X41 Nw (W. C.o I ia PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature & S 6s kr% I 10 3 °l 7 Oc S 0 n s'. �ff)T- C P wT We Nc �1 uf `"r-PJ6O" We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to PETITION STATEMENT construct a large industrial port complex on FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT the shores of Hood Canal. PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE i v r,,,4 GD %l� 1,e S � P,27 %cam L) v. b s A -a r,O, -14 0 3� ,T dw-� � alp �Ci - CILA e J ?q 3(2z 4,� nes it'w" L L Fir e4 s PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name�J Address SignaWe oma- Z' _.�; 3 6434040 ul E ARAK4, It C2 ILU4N� �.—ZALLER 0 0 A 03�y 1 I U LC�G� rldle,- Ia `7_ PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATERK 20 L U 2 �1 MI e -L C -K �3 5 M,49 C 1 /-^S Paz-?- ,Lu o %vim P4 - -1,e i 1,e .0 y .4.v � t SC�� ft � �,- k4 � PA� ' O W Ucwur tit IVU&Ekrt' Poi- W • A Sltlwo 1 dG Lc', f' tgT:s MATS LA) Pao2A l! �C AN B ''o 4V O LZ W L�_)A IC Ack r e -r e. r`�' ( o Ai /x 6g�R� SAN '3092— 2 S o, %7C U->COA.J/ x'8-36 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts"of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature Ct41M"5v-_UM I LINDA :TAR\JI S OvA4� BE 0 Fes. VAU-UY RD. P �.� -��o- �'e�-i �mw 6JS►�a le� ILI t�p_�'LA I t2,3 k n4 P.'w 2 1`17 V Lcc>e__t w RV& t..3tti- 'L PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS IGNAT RE J��7 LY PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE JuJc 4Q -T az�e ( �-v. ✓�-��c d�� d6ol Nuxodivir- Po 13 e8-5- LAW Don► lZiABuxj(, W 2,770 T & w -c pD 0"" A�X ZW Na O, V'A 4g*�;zv C � i PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature CC l OUWd A 01 mc,-YJ(tve ` gip-. C� 0 QQ (C),,J� (C-���L44FIr "�3ru.��� i F�/P�--• 19DWI u � 76 G1C,Q LnJ- i kAty\ 1,3 yuS br'" woI IOC P 0 IkA � LJ,4 ? 3 to �Y j / /(11a PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature ;7%-14f fly --Jo 491-( kc M PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE ` �� .� � �O L f'�'Za( �-1 • � tom. mac' S�- J /� 4,lqvv� Alv R R ✓ DLL --/ 77 UO,, v opo t L L se,�� la PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT I, mod I LIN � � �s I PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME 'ADDRESS SIGNATURE do • •WaM1 1 , i , 'i 10 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS -SIGNATURE I)b(4,f 4, 60X x'.39 7Y 10 -LAI b,1,0A 03a o ZAo sa�a 4-�i LA,,vuA-w 1,20Z L LL-t�AAL -ep 7 2, AA� Ot r(HVd sou tly t0b OWU60 PL -Qt-4,fA 4:fl 114t PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE v �12 774- 76cL6- Vu E WA ID 3T",- OA eA- ,/c p cyq-t",- 6elA4 ovA q,7-' -0 [c)c( 4>P5�0/4/k- ZZ114 3? re o fir 61 r i;#,o A 70 -Je rrUhl� la Part .4 -w -Las u),k. Qs3LZ //.,S� Zoo)� —114- 29-,� lo7 41 it! o,,z W, ffw2 t--- LVI Ai jc P4 ld PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE C 4sa.,C �4/ s n s �-,�G- t= n ' F�. vu,u r9 c,/ lam - ,� "-I>e VOo-v\ M �r r 1 "r � ; /41�,� L � �✓aM/Rsc �.'S t � �— Cit ��7✓I �--;.,1.i�� . .,iv0icif G X1, 00, 1�to �' �,�� E 5 w �• �a err tltbU,-j Gr5a� Vhf . S' �(So2- �P/OQ1' A7 SCA ViS` A �iR/tAC 3 4)0-L) r c "-I>e PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment, rPrinted Name Address Si ature B&A Orli ny j77ii1�%%lk/�r� -i L/ �'T 4/' k( 4/ ,Q ' �l,�e- `t 1 (( rl LN o�'-t o w I P0, -($K,3 9 � 4 ,M N PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE RPR av�l soll),an/ 13 8z r i i f PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME I ADDRESS -haw-vt 62 W rML-Z (o 13 i -q -(� Lo,�� &P—� �5 OKlglc M J �� Lit► h �Oh 1>0 Bo x (133 (3t -i n ri o t), w 6 P +kom 90 Q' 9 -- Vt,ete; t;- rdGc> �gYx& ! T r tm SIGNATURE c- PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT 1 V V I ( v K/ V% -.pG/K,/pt w I U I Ll • - r,11l�.vi%L�jii�'il�l�/J'��� - ilii�isi.,�:•� .;.'� 1 V V I ( v K/ V% -.pG/K,/pt w I U PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESSSIGNATURE /?!l tou.)m tcj Vl/,+ �a�t� L,eSS�✓ t� vuc: W{4Y PT-, LJA S A. 11 l r- PT U A Q _x' cue �?I�N� d PT ifa. e63L W B hi �cr� h asst ICA 9 "TWO "A'ka fres v i4c-t,..v Sj7� S 2S �,k 30d-t- c- PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE EL 45 F t —t h s rnar� e C w� .Su sa f% u, 2233 Coot Avt, P -r qpxto, 6t�� ��►-t, � ac.� Jnr ��. � 5' � �Lo,e �fi , L k -PZ 11z 2-112- r3 azzc✓ �� ee Y `0&0- ��'�- 4-,J A14 - Ft &Q\C-t, 2o-ka-/ (2:)o % - �el 0Wol �s l aMat 23/,S7 11W to vv c&X WA PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE ► T. J c- C. �acr I �fzzs� Iv e ✓' oidle.. s, Ln (Rd C�V-ma.L'O S0 40,x,1X6-3 0� owe �v�� i-�`► (�mqn 23`f GLOM") 7 IL/c, ►G'Lus.J P GJ 0-1 te PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME SIGNATURE • ..�.. -. �. r//I 1 00 -MM 12 w i FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT OT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accomodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We. demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature I-) N 0,4 CA K ZOO NE: 90A _ F'^C d0,W AY LQJ IS-murn to: Hood Canal Coalition, FU Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 S PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE P7- 1 �' 6� �/ 3 6,� L -05a S ►KWSo pr- -o ff t `.N E Kr r4&y J,CNAIJ�7,; l 3 A C -" "14 t tl U �CLo Ami a S &K&Zs PT &A XaK A 2a 3 S �I LR" LambArKee PT, l3rctl- ,h rs c n Ca ,uQQo-cam e �� boo L q S 5T Cot "N �� s �� el D)( �"3 P T 0 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE t'71 wo r..l o/I,✓ 69X — Abx /10,5-1 P J t✓/i `are z c orb r (juv k fi An pto 8 C4,�QL C(mwm." ctS"t2'S�,k-,�- o11.? CA O• il%�% 62.T TowuS�.v i o StvC4kdi' ev35 w� P-1 G1 3 6� - 1 1 � t o W 1r S'r1 f/' F\. f / 1-11 v&,t PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE A -A- . ' C ue� I(� r "" 1 lc)' 03 f6�' A,,t �A) Eck j r w ¢ �10Gi tp Boy ..��f�� 1335 Gkt rZf P�'w Q1 vJld V �►� 1 Ci 04,1 A.V(,� r,e� onavk �fj T �RaS�9 -9-H (-c6,, t`s p T Oea.� Po 2cA3 <<�n� TT L�� HOOD CANAL Petition Statement .:.. Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hili Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq a R a 8 ox 6 71 ; 5d v,-,Va,1 611 RY 111,4 UP1AJ wk• `Z 6393 Sm"FA 6ch 8^- ne.f-- [, _Fori-Gti,o40o VU�1C 2/ .� e -n -� T ACC ,L -L_ zqu& �- amh P- RA%I% C4 Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq a PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE C�R�L RV GrAK (cA Cot\&O(\ LostL,-� LAkouD �Whg83b ' �q � �C � ,... a IN14 Lie/ (P o Co ���'►1° vw� R��b � S L C�VgA- Fr. 1,>✓ y-c�.,i. -E- LU A--183 A� �. , uv, 4 fo box A-71 Po �j Wo.9 c°,3:1 0471 4AORiE C-41k�lRES Ql -Z�-o A R � �� Q� a.j SIC r'4 ac, X ...�► u� �., 1 \urz � C�. �3�c 11 I I 3� s Ka,j S ra , IL �ooct �c� T fi�' Sf . a PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT Ui IIIZ 19 DI 1 1 1' LTMr1� wx� �-ol r '�'-�,� r ill• _ 7 /� / 1. r_...0,II • r. 1� J PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE �/i GILi 2416-Liewsk,, �f�wy 4770 ro,e,-- / G l� 'c� )3367- Fries ' �� 9� wyt- �,, - & t v S+ ?9/s ' (�( V-7 $�' � .� ST- qn� L 3 L.. t--3 `'"F S �S CCS. y 1� P W#4 qP3� ce r.2) LA FhaF .7 PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature lL' G c1 17 Y: i r I' 37V7 olf�/JAZY _ 00'�e F- 5ii V1 J 'lw A/O Kc kieteAley t r j a2 tcp W ,e 66 v .Z: /F�P 5�3zS _U FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROTECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address At Signature rlNLe n /-//"x-s o k2 6 s I o 0C' �/m L � DTT__J n_ t rr t•.• nULUIR w: Timm Canal Loan on, Pu Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 M PETMON STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE M ca, �> U-4 )VI��� - 2�Z �i l l vrv�, St P F - C, , �� ! t 3 �` �"`A 0, t (,j Iry C4 .4A, leo rwrL& YvV,4 x6 3 Ile ^ r a Apit,urij ga Ij 6 13� 30 a 64 ra4i65T)p A;, /I I L 1 Q �t Gt wet rf 2- 21 10 12e n 4eQ _ L ti �xy2ry�L< uciG T - � �1 \1 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT—TO—PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE "rl° a � 0 U �AL, t !n f Ll 'f [ 1v �iC�'/ . Af, �CLjl v PT 6 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT I PRINTED NAME ADDRESS G �+ o<.: f �, tc ` r— `1 5 (�: rte. e.. 5 ,� �L . `r� ,✓� .�1�tZ J EFF ft 011 22 -v cNimA, Al ck Wil ✓c 4-v WA �qA 6176 61 o S _� Ttu� 14 W�(A, , 1, 6 �T"�� 2 2 (.N M El /&c),?- 12 �2 F �5�9' ��6�Y�L e4)i 3w Cara I (As- 76� ( 4,57 -- i \�J PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGN G✓� �-rF,Z -�"a,� d.4�r/ cww6 s y .� H �l� l��1c I<5 � ca� Nar PgAaLVVI PT I &A Pn I uc sr dt) ,b �O0 a A) PL • �Tcin -�-d �� W0� T P• o . (��a� tv,-7 1 w� �iYlo� . � 931 �Jw6 �L 4 �a. /;C �y,�� zyE,S- .�►a.�./ �!l/K m i el66 /�.o cTT oDeyc 1737 BaaEG9 may cit UvA I 0 "1'1� er�.id{� Vv-" v J�, PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address TOS�PN �� MACKIE 181 Hoc i<ieleratiy C'• -Signature l Poor Tvw�sF� 9 S3 G 8 .VO I, LeYV► �/�IL)e- OA 5. sr,lWi., PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 5!-E�J(E7 '-T sc l f 2bo22 2315-7 PL S L -- WA, Y36 "14 ST C )"715 Mat- �� v► vn� (c, �,--j tin! V� iia 22 I PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT I / i I ., .Iii. �-- �_ r i► �i�i :a�l►f:� � I �1 i � r � r I / PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ,3A.-/ ADDRESS 30o Vat~ -r ac- ivE G -3o2 R G vru�J SIGNATURE 2 77DLiLI l S AV(� S. j�IS, �LIA1-C.�V �I� �LG Nt�tC9�Od17 /a.V�. SE. iZE�i•�, C�� 98m �..�o s£ `d4. 9? �I'1-G� � roc., �'1' 1,i,5,¢i y,2S6 iJ . LK • Sa. rr,.•,�. • '�`.,� 06647 fi-G e( I►nO1��, i I `` lgjlU 4WJL �r ZI)� a'13a 190-" Are 5c wA 1�;4Ro 4 S�v c� . 1,U A• - R g zit fo ' � //////•��//J�, /J /may///� �a� G ��;/`�,`�: D �� �-' ��///� PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE \ Y\ - q.V_j S +)p-. C �L_e_ UD �} cn PIA .)3zoLI pi LJ 6of�,11 L J A -go?.1 %-7;a a 35th PL- � 9gu �-� -PW ) ��✓r�re(Js 'dw air ato ��� v► Plw f ca-wts pa � ,s 5 s o/� 9 �� / 1 3 W [% an� po Psnald weQ ave Vqtll7eC.- YS'I i ckt z, F�V KA- L l- l qto l ME Z3 P LAMC i2.it'Ro�! Hddv� cW7-S - (7-4rh NTb�.,l KV14 • �1BOv (p _ - ��� I A.�-�- ►a3��. _<z /atb st 700 trf �...- 1_ Sst v/�.G/ W14 �'1 �1 ,� rJ'/d / c1 1 r/ �}� 'J U � T S ` cn UA �1J 1�' 0 yam-/ / 0 4f, 0�6-m PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL 1IN/FATERIALS PROPOSED PIT- TO-PRt�JE+CT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those wlio make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. PE'T'ITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT I ADDRESS SIGNATURE ERINTEDAME /�/, z 1,c�o ���,� ✓ �� �a 980 ,�- ��- Gi n L DB3 C& �� F ld�l ��GGe Utgo � 1, r' a441 lWW dc. l 13 k( e 11, WA- 9� . -mawoUlujilul, 1�I I G LL � Z� e ee y� 3 N Int r r�� �` I� 47A- 51" 1/ (�k4 i I PEYITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT F wi ,Cc I t4, g 141� Sc, 'At/ CSL A DDRESS -----SIGNATURE Via. ,�ox.�9.� l�r� �'� YA -- I 7r tZo1—ve?WP 13 -ALIz,q cwr- &7jo `/5 to'l it), cs,-,o— L L Ae vve /4A. Vad f A— m ,� 1 PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature Kyo ��x 3aby p A,q' a72 .300 V 01- M W L4 Wim, ✓ l w in Q,, ��� "" i� d t'tC V V l a.�e s -Da ter; Kt„n.ed') AY-, Oj kvom , W k `1 <,-D l Ck WIQA"A' a 1 96 I PETITION STATEMENT PHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 222 V s rn r,-,)" tiT7 /" L-✓/+ 76 kA-scaA Irl w10a �--- t K wle \ 0 --- !e.J AAA kcj 16Z�Y142_L4 L 2 ? £� S H'�✓i✓U� GN �✓�� vo �3 r I� oLi,*4 o Bby, �1 i i l� PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE lCt g&ZCM V 57 1 46- S 33) I2e.Zt'; Caldwall ��l�l 7 -0 - ' , PTQAA A PT 1055 v JIFNN Ifs 900u -tt Ll EF, cine 1.vckal.� l Sia/ 7� �l •� �'fN►rG►�, . IGt�. 111't wo < Gave �9' .._._ l JCICA 1 G . V uh*i- MA FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment Printed Name Address Signature 2q6. 3"'1 41 C - 24 /&V .SeAeF/<9T e. %'2'Gt1 `le -�!/LV 13 L �r�7 22 JC3 Return to: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT i� We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who rrtahe the fcrtun-es, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature ihu►�.DDA o h i 1,5 3r_, PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE "*� 10 J7'lUq)40u-7H /f —4!f 0 � t % t 3cd.l�M 2� port y3 3.3Ad �mi1 54 1 I � PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS �ilf 7 i lic PVI til 04le Oct, 130 S , 4,/1 ,,?-// 4c -e 6e.44�o, Lti �vr✓r� G SIGNATURE 41 1 �'Z A1C "�� ✓1, �! Q � � � CLL.w�� /fi(7H�Ai�io k'D ,uGs7D,J WR--E�y& COLIGHLAtu 5'( � P_uGtc (2o, 6 �—cr. iiry �1. L" PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 7q7 ct -Fo JV 4 _ 1 i PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE mQ�, m� M 'M14 VJA- - t' �M�- �c� z ce0 -A ie OK4, /V rYj C C kI rz cke.a �q�rb � � � I 13 3 u.�.. C- - 8 � f� za �I��l�ev ¢d • �MQyIWM1� �� M maLe- e at, ►� ase Ro. Q>OX167Hai 10 ci e� 6.:), swan soc. k P r� PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY SIGNATURE ZAtn 7eA6 Ave G..- m u7 EDDIE MgXKwAfj>r 1) 2 3 U—,9ve-, S. ,4 [ Go vh, I CDr�� � + r0.r�� 4535 lo.,\.5 Qoe-f ©�^Ck�ar-d �1 /'► � . I i I i I I I I KWIA&I U LV• a%-%-, r.v. nox 03Z iy, rort Ludlow, WA 98365 3 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROTECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature Css�!%t. • cT �r�� / ej j3 0 .-X 3 u o 14 Cv ,e)01�1/1�LOHg96.7=1 a1lGzk'4k2.ke4,s E 12x3 2S Z 3 9 //0/2 04#gX S SA A�i Ae,1�rL9$ 3 _ neiumw: nooa Lanai Uoalirion, FU Box 65279 Port Ludlow,, A P565 ' PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME tvkp T r w J> %-Xr vvw ADDRESS CITY a3 hr ca e :3SvQ s -ka • l o G SIGNATURE 9Lr 1 ` ' ti Y�� G 06<e-rb' -383-1 3� Tve- S , Lu'�•�es c ..a Cory OS e- Z 3 5- 3e) - 7G r! LV �C�// to %1 C✓� 1,�//� �n: i ; ;' fiN'14 JD clOf/NSON ��22 S. �v. /0 -71 i i I xeturn to: JIUU, Y.U. Boz 65279, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Cabal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature 7o,- 1313 oN Q90 3 Al E: 54ey� q L_ a� Return to: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, A 98365 rm N PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY SIGNATURE !ggl,a_ Or7` �,ucjlDuj c2 fox G s�g� WP &,.% t31 iv • • $�lTCrf 4sEt.. �.y � d f - RIM ,a Gtnrr�r6 1� � 7` ''d Pi-zv rar Lem iriow 11.Y ��� r G C I7 r ��G �i' ,' ✓I c "et %t%( a i r_ rcturu w: r.V. no% 0327Y, Fort Ludlow, WA 98365 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industri$lization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature 2r/ t�3S'So.�©r�T,�ci�ic� v 1�- ix"' L.,. "vvu %-du tl �,OUIIUOn, ru BOX 6-179 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PTT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY SIGNA (01 9 Return to: HCC, P.O. Boz 65279, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROTECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be throntened. Hood " -1 will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Si tur l 7D&W S-�EhC Z Q6b0 L � 8' p� G2 l/.✓T 1 k,)4�. `! %�. ��A. ��. t �'1 � � �•'� � r�; ..r,+c:. ;` . r, �,...,� (mow � ,� W ald J."L. w• =ice %-UIta, � UU11LIon, ry tsox del iy Fort Ludlow, WA 98365 IYA PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PTT -TO -PIER PROJECT NAME 4 Od n/ t -T` c C 61 A Lo ftl�M X45 LOf-� Rte/ r✓J,�J,hv� /J �Ei��/'S, i L iZ�,t3�T?�t �C Son/ ADDRESS CITY SI ATURE Z l— �� T Z_W a o ?tfi 57 Aorta- Z e4.z" zJ V,4 Y Return to: HCC, P.O. Boz 65279, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal: Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be spelled to indusiriali ation and massive pollution. Tne Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment Printed Name Z414A4P 411//ee Address son 7 L `y' Return to: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 I WE PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY SIGNATURE FH h, 4 Gar � Y � l� �1P,7C- 9 �D �}!e t So KI i 1>+v1b M. I amcc olz A�L Kc) free Pou�sl� 19g2J "�h dqvr wV ------_-- .�. �••..., ",a vzpA /y, ror[ LUdloW, WA 98365 ri7 PRQJE T T (I\ 't 9 J 2-7 D PIT- We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accomodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address 77/ Sw.4,sr cru 8 33 ko �n � k� r . w: tl e_e, CJ. KI e'3`eC.CDai',ts'o� Qui lc�e�Gva Return to: ood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98 5 n PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY SIGNATURE coup - Si q4 1 % S i 5�- VS r . I 441 Se v �i„�� � 1 p`�B- l�'rG 6�%j - �� -►-r ra o S r-7 ss rzv f' IU !A) _ CC�yYJOh J ti lU r� Sta 14LAI-I /'v,3i,,/Svr � Z Zr 5`l ,4% E, �Eo-iiL� G✓A 5 h Return to: HCC, P.O. Bog 65279, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PRQ,TECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Si tore PC 10 aU -Fjt�& wZb 5-t v al 5 (5f&-5 1 CA,j /(i'/ c Paw `-4 lot -u �-ARRy AVM Paw L/ to ee MEN Return o. Hood Canal Coannon, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 983` v PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PTT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY SIGNATURE 20�©mayZAI- �+iV7pl�Lfi _..SCs K NaG� '(fi�'fZT Lv L�L.p t.� k-' /i �c��-- .-��r►---� I Qa lit 11� Jcy � _ a �U �O•.3G I I i i � I f i i I xeturn to: HUC, Y.U. Box 65279, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the iong Term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Si tore ar Cl C3 - a 113 n� �vL f�qy 1 Aa��' g P �IAI ,spaR A e+ 1_ u (a.- V Y Return to: Hood Canal Co lition_ PO Roy 65279 Pert All A nbllrc vas i+uuaV VY, ►♦ A 70JVJ PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PTT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CTTY SIGNATURE 9 �� t�J 1�IE l CO,wI F 301 ISW./ ruE" RID s El-ftlt4c CAI -u06+ P-4, L?365 /o Sr -S'/�j ' �CTF Al /6�, ^111' �19L?3(, - — • L � i ff i � r c �r I n L. f1 Y1 Je c t i Y1n AL i �z. --I E 6h L Vo e So j 6 � f iceturn to: HUU, P.O. Box 65279, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROTECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Si tore VO n ,k , x� -AJki- A, -JAcoBso ?f c3qvAell l L5 LA k, 4E 06 VJA- 9Ff37 —1-11 Eve iivvu Umar waitron, ry Box 03279 Fort Ludlow, WA 98365 U PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE k) C 130 , LN,, Mw itz, 14-� W'i q g, 13 4Fx.'rQY4 f?, a—�, CL4\e,(,m V A, qk t 6� C +iJi�� h��r Fr -rowgrenot., 14//9 • I Al -'l PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature e S-�Vy-� � e E -V" O.-1-4, n GabY,ah� �? lid las 65�'02�n172 Ism -2. (�l�t SYxnc ►��1. TO�A_nC�- v/3d_ 9qs_S_& CIS 19 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Name Address Si tore rPr7inted fI/ C S a r.'Z_ 5 t1', E4 i v L3vA VJG/7 rOr[ LUCHOW, WA 98365 a FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accomodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature r S- L J�q T96,Cc N �� �, C'A rvt,3G,2 e-4luc ' ro LC T L u D 6 a (_J J`` �.i L MO OLdF Iq3 CA -M(3 fAL Liv-v,)e �i L U L'O UJ9' 5 y -Atip✓,+ MAS t C &", A i re (-A--.p Pt C.i1®L64 T3e5 Return to: Hood Canal Coalition. PO Box 65279 Port T.ndinw WA 9RI(S FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROTECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Si ture 5 (A �.. eqh«� al�WdWWJ VIA .9dab 4� W, u.3L Return to: Hood Canal Coalition_ PO Box 65279 Pnrt Ludlnw WA QQIAs _1� PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 1Z a par) ks �3�7 P T lea� tit 0 C k L.�' r.0 kee- �pfejt G+ WftoxL Vt V i /i-� C A w �6 V P7- V r Ni F 931(,-Z r. Y /l� PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE �lT 3((, - Ie r ► n!kr 1r �N 13 (a n �o R T��Y`� 2� V4 �3 o G .ZAIW� Wilk- --r"tar �- ••• AN lle)V)a 44?tA�ll 6;71q P,, �7-- ez/ --30 K% 4A e, t% 1 : [.LANIEE �17.A1 E S PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE f � KffkcK Y7 - r old � � r q 4` /Lz c,.� [106 13 c k c,c IiN /LA b-,� ��H �nz (A(2Ivic— PAo 13 00 l Fl C / A 'Y� p% a (5tyV-e, S OU,2,t-� 607 P PT 0 3 0� ± 5 �A�D�I% 1016-2-9 '%'� i 1 'c, -t 16 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE Joutc Ao zmS,otj inti S. je n d Si'. F� P-} I -? I I pl— s-( P. L -7�iu�_ e 1900 �h�c�, r I' ?% �pNN �'ofl(:N 9 r-koN fh 1, 16/1 (70 �)dAc, K(u, M u v�.V\ W R �v� 1-e�- i ✓inv�� SO5 P pr W- A q $36 b `` - PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE gPRINTED 3 rig 3 i t1vt 3 1,Z -wd I nr� J -a I H-�r t � i of�u> 3 � mA ,4ll f°&re-10 -1-61inSE'17 � or r d WA Ir PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE &A qcx N4.4Ae W � r� (1Jj } r'�%j^✓Y.t P � � l /GLC. ?--aGK �G `'�n 21,�Z J t 13 -?1 -551,0jV ,,,.7 L) ���`� ► 3//Wj- 4 6r 0 u 9300,141 90 -3 a-ul.\A O- �� rr ri r4� W r C l:: pr Js s*r- PT E-1-1 3pl F 7/0 ,L moi- <I- �-- c P I-STO N ,IWA 54 6 J 7 PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. FPr_ffiin_tedNanme Address Signature Li �4DA T. 4c{ L-QvAq -1 z- ,g)S �-- J- �4*j m 3B "Z- *�00 L'9, ' � ''" " 4-t U .L I '/% ' t LJ r R 6 1 /) Y v PILUA % � - i� 1 5 PETMON STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 7Y 061, �ow(��l I �l eo V r ��� P\lk�-cck 3� CIS avec S� �ll� l - 1 ' PT h! c &, I �0. �&cpC 4s`a7`� I PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SI ATURE -A Ilelt po w �© P�j 6, r <-�­Z D(CA� &JW S ��a 3 4��� ,o .•i S? �f y i 1 At 22&1�L Lau► S��;fi' 705 T. SJY,�,- nn i fo/L Cf- 1✓ICY YILI w W ir\6nc 1 gi c� OLS L/ PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT-TO-PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE JZL rv. pue P7- r9 UtiA Lt 14A Luk 9l (v c4 Po T T lCl� L Ck WA qF3 �' Ika �'lb��lQ. `� • 0 .�1C, IS � s «,y' 5b9 t I�aJsr I ,c. /Cees Na.,7na72) 1-12AI o� pf Mac; /8.DAw sem, r T w.�— fd!O PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE J . Ce�5 iia �,ti��, a,�IV I ` r � I C ' f �-1AID4 J. Ro Hp.S p °. g. g e y L( T` 00 Al / ave �i0141e 16rgo 1197, Pl— 4, 14,,�ea L w cd 4-< 44- et PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE zt COO Ll Ga�f� C -L CQm( nu Dr. A � Jew 3 3 l Loi,, -,Q Diaz c Vinci vt-t-co ro rc lv" uAOo-O R 8562e a � � j Rt 03,, z ulbC -t- W c�33y f�tii Lucy I -A nos a YI 8 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT—TO—PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE ► V'� ►'h y ✓� S 6 ©���-wc�i► p" �.. ,v—�t, V tt, v 00 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature Nti Eaxzj�e- C3jv' �= &r Ior� a 1-4 Luca IZZ' j i' �+ 7s V 09J �-7 T Keturn to: riooa Lanai Coalition, PU J3ox 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and - protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature st- a, h (d s ?► KISden I �s vl -2 73 S PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT m � l � /�L!�i /moi//� I� _.I,i.J �.� _ �.u,.r,' �� •+_ (�!�� - • l f l rip r m PETMON STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED FIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS�% SIGNATURE kyr !T )- k Nk ✓ �// / % .,(i�-(- [�'f+�'�p� ALJ Ct J'%�C !��✓Zx, &:2L(" a i 7 N A 7 PO) ��(LCn � � •.rte `�` g"3� ._�`�,��:,�.,�`�� , � � � l• ti Ck:. J PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT—TO—PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature AU A WRI�t�T urcN 3osa3 S* Ho,� 3NE- POO sbe. w�} 9S.370 � R - ��UCC B wC _oER 305-a3 HWI 3n1E Do. is bob ILZ A i837o 3601(.t .5CCJJiC ,kls� w �—� _Du,v u, :-r L. (,_I ( CGU �J PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Si at= Gl Or(CIL 1, ��'iar'f _ X71 Donct ld �o',�v/ A���-����. Vv�NJ� S-rr--,`Oj<D 6161 b'OnC(_l4� �A' Qu,. 1 el, r PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED N/AM�E/ : ADDRESS i� SIGNATURE . / 14 L"t i .zcel 13&le- j it-�� Y j U . I �_ fc�� • tt( , I17- L'�t#lv P t l.0 cll1 - � /00 u i i ? � (4 ��S cc�s� � CIL ipl/l, 98'3&5 XP4i P3� B, Yeae N vep i pif� W365 /�o 11��. PETITION STATEMENT FILM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT CL, nrro�• 14v�. � tj PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment Prated Name Address Signature T I L G��t�5c>(�' �`70�� coo C' y PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT ows-ILT A "II PRINTED NAME i ADDRESS t4() ut lei nflqa k RAN 6.1 I r CC\ PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected offcials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature 3& Se "M SisTees led. 7S, 983�5 Itev1, Mt,�, ,591zt 16 I.N O S4e 7 SiSrIER 9 C?D S ou._(5ho cv�.. 98370 l7 -7 v o CI ffm -tL PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRANTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATU In #4 klFAa— S7 c/< (l e w Pl &r 2a4,!,,v, 4/,4 M �✓' i0.h In.[ M �1... �rdirt 7D Sr �t � � V fLY l �i�--r-.,.-... � S 4 -Ce A b c 6Z4g- l�u� 71 2b P; n C JYJ LLC o 4 11,17 4ZAv't S� . ervL A ��ZO ,J ID Z6 uC,� 130) 3 yZ- ver erff, k)ji wL 0 �����h�C u I Lw TUL5�oj s2&,-Ae 0 7� l Ste-, wA gi7`6 V l" PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PTT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS STQNATURE <lL�`A y% pi—I .5Pf Q-7- Ile c%[�yv nl/ C� �✓ � �+-- m't vv r/3� J -1 �(U LV `� (AJI A Sir apps -),741& Q'TTb ST ?r L� &. C �.(,.�.Q-C ,2� 3 - �r.��-k-,,N oa W A PT C\)I- E144 C. -' G ' U" I PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 'r tAU OFF �q ,,,,, 'l'� � ear � .2- �a s � e r ��' P• �i � '�--� .,,, sue RL vly� �1 C No AU- q , t ► p .F 1 X56 s�` '7q16-�dd�� T►�Z< <S 6' 3 A/'L44a-Is'r7`7��� / l,� PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 157 5 1 raw, 3 3 3 ILA-us%Ck z 7 -n>.0 ILI Atlylw �eA-e 1 L 1 -2 LA/4- 7- C) ,tom VW lb3l LW4 5(. warn j \ CA. 7- -�o� H(K -L-A ^ev ,Q S.410 W �� q(. P �.� PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAMEJADDRESS SIGN- � N.���/� eit a� so `S16 Sit 6 /00 6ezec, ib -b2 O's 5 V) `1ooia iar N cYdla.,�( %i(j �r° .. I--- c, - is PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNA 2461 VU 11 of W o L Ai Q�JUA �,Aj -8 Lvjc4 L,.A \;J 19 2- S� 04AG �; Vl i rO 1240�� Lq'i A I Q.,,- k- VYN V) 4-W- qo-1 C,4 Fro A) t) ii(f 62 F. 1,04-4- P. T, L) < �'cx (C I 7ca-l- �J PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE Y ' �C�(i V • 1 ' a 'v�Yt L j L c t, V j c - ode �✓ l� Ll G D v - tj A i2 P% 6E O. k.:( F . U , G (�hAm- wl x Sazc- A"v- + � J ie/,/f<. 8,C) "i� �4 P T 02L % 7 �(A &Y Y\ & G�� y -c-54 a Y-&-VA-)LY-Y) 03 q!7-7 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT-TO_PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decis� i` ns based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the hort term benetof a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment Printed Name Address L'.1 Signature P9T21�e- E1,6Y 0 110 SleV NS H"LQ, -Y b /1<ozo cA, aA e /11y1 Shy e ou -oWper Oast ad low P s o ��` r /ear NY STr Le.� Sa cc le�'►�¢5 T ur1. 3 G Keturn m: Hood Canai Coantion, FU Box 65279 Port Ludldvf, WA 98365 ------------- PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE i MP3 I t • c t �,Sc G, M► �1' ► 1 � n ;w l fdr;�w - �- • rT eon � �,� ��.�- S� l'' •3Lop cool ..�., 3sk,^- S. ,o r a�so C�r-c.izc, l • rL. 7 ? � PT 1�v ss V��^- Z� w�a l lids pr ` 06 co Z' / � U PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE J r /v>>fav —llc �' 1 ✓, `5���1 � I�� cls � c v k. c,,,, �< < � �✓,q �1 f `� �Z L �1,63iJ Z-0 s� Jo �o -.7, r, T�Vfse, Lb -V p r ✓t 1� A,� --� p r. wA 919 3-,/> Jo IJ L(,1 -PT A J VA PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE cur (A . psu a ����` e T W c- � 861 -fit- 7-01--Z) titi lJ. qqoSung ti�c�\1J��u.� rzo, vAC Rcw a A 5`f E f lel. i -foF, I sq tP T 1-,/,/ 3wr�fv, rd i ULC) Io N�Cur �,ur h ate• 123la �,� s fi. Gyfi I )5 C' PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT I� i� WIN 1111 I'll Xv. ON 0���I • I � � �/ F Mimi I 0111, \' Up 1 i / ,✓ fir► r I� i� PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE � ��, ��d�� t4©� 2 �'ob w,�s��►�--rdw,� sr 1Q , Gti�/ ?z) =�, PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature r J�l9 D <o4l rt/IEV .C,A% ,01_" t,; 4"OZ4 4J 919Ja,s /0123 4hzi � 17 �a�aa/r�. ®art 1�,4 9, S,gN�RA H/LL 'S 6qfo /7 4',.i tW 0 /', ;�,�% %1,! �;�=�•',S C'"!.{j%j <?If iil?i1/�/�ia""r :..1/�' •a G' C PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impa&s of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatNoed. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature A� AlffNe e,Ai e 7 p y8 a �r N NVr 0 ! . fetJ'1-0 ( Xme,, Aei s lc `� v�ry ` vrlL` Q 3. 'TA -117" I f .ON C-1 SSE CE U IU (( C 5r wti.Mz, '1411 ' U11. Doth 14,h;�L-- sfATtL� �I ()y Gam- 4 2 4%�.k S-/�_ o Z tr Cary cr Patty Olson 61 Margaret St. Port Ludlow WA 9836 S PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT—TO—PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATUR C �. o. 3 39 `l q EFS--c�Nc�1. Al y I yk, 7 t7 L 5 ti 6 •o . �3rnc (1-7a7 pl- ISa R$r I �sl t M . %a?" S,�� �' WXA o w, e er LA; L 1% A) "kor sur e-- by Pox %DNa%4le p%�- 4& 067 u �! /3rvAms . Ae 6JUfi A 9%0 ol.ym iOJ 1 A9� s n � -loll� 37c o /4-B-� *VC' Ai PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected ofcials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature .:' �' !i'' ;� Y � /ti/�/�/- ✓ � ���'` /%`lam' -L- Z'- 111Zur i ; � .t;� c� ' L U� � n � �v PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We'demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature 7 4, �S'J -, Y6 3 t CSA,J M PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature s�� w ►� g g lis l 4 r? X33 rd- G 2. c _ZE L[. gEq F �t i(4172 SE 33rd W4yNC J)L4-JJe_ r3 �d�Is S7'�yn(s %a� a _ WE- l `0A V// ` a�� Pr PETITION STATEMENT FfjM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIED PROJECT r I o Lam", PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY S NATURE d _ EGETt1i.EF-Ai _'Wow lof Te OP-noq, s -6-a A�V�hk"1115 3 / 7-T Return to: HCC, P.O. Box 65279, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 q FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry navel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an l 100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 --foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal. Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature JPci_nVe11_2;�,c©n Law G/v ' 4a-. xeturn to: Hood canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 RIM J PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY SIGNATURE G Lc� 343' ' ihml aI cAr`-=vc Pcr'r A- 9'?j /�� o -w- /VaAe �•l1ed5agiN7'4ud��u> "ojP 26 Y "7,) m��,, r ewe, Z- Al )04%3' GRcE•llUI�cc) LANA l - y bLc 3,( Ira dei- e n� pa4f q Al e:E o r► n n ) * ,--`^)owoseyA' �avAo C�s w / ZAJ 16 [ JL /v 0 ' f "A14 *Wpmig5-0w ert DAQ U) S Return to: HCC, P.O. Box 65279, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 12- FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment Printed Name Address Signature, 11 1 Sv YI d (V I MO Civ, G1i� P)ichcicT 13`jrr (3"o S tyx St rc r V i. 7a t -i r, r e �(, Itii� 9 3d a ✓,, %✓' ~�- 6my,J-D(Dr c oa-3 g_ 'CI -YM s W" Pml� o S Return to: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature Q TJ mJ • An/rnAn/►r J S I .So''rg 1-7ort ".IJOL( Z I t'N #1CtM IJ -rd ,A r 2 Z►A)6 dCr L�ai.ou�, LV.(- �J Ark Z&A Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE v�f�� �• �J� (.L i S �p� rj�7�.iJ�tD/Anfa L„�. W A� - i'l�, W,��:.�ltg---" ecLtf ic I a 0 A X Lap �u 0 � • ��N�`l 5 � o , � i� �.� Su q uA7,n If VA TO ?- �of ct%33 V U . 171 20 S . �9-rvG�-Z �. O4 v( Su Ql''�-i s• Z 0, lC T Return to: nt-t-, r.v. mox 65279, Fort Ludlow, WA 98365 I PETITION STATEMENT Ar . rv-v nr A r c pRnPnfiFD PIT -T PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include mine,a large strip , nd an 11100 -foot conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Cana by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting economy. We 3wi11 and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and para on the hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disaster are the eot borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public an Printed Name Z);km UFS 't k P -r'o t'l C_&e_o L_ i tPTO tiI4 M4a,1 SU_r- r AMINr Ate' X b C_ 5AA 1_ .o cv JQeD &I. -2m64 Address x-43 st4 GeEeze ,V9Ta�,� 4 porzT �-y�L�ii � r�J fw �plZ7" hl7 9 Hac-v �` 3 et A LCF-lw . I PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADD SS SIGNATURE I PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature S 5 r 3i - PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Si tune 1-,h N GSC^ ec P' -T— 1- o �� ZZNL �' 1 k4I L S Ira ST f'—,, ToLuu ,csv - 77?; mi 43 A M PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment Printed Name Address Signature l�G rt t U- . P.T. ISI - 9-- FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROTECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment, Printed Name Address Signature Y. Q,3o3 �-/�, AA14JA #AJU7'R50A FD Mon) Z s U 9 g o 2._0 kr' 45Dd ' JA 9 J Return to: Hood canal coalition, PU Box 65279 Port Ludlow, 'WA 98365 r L FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We -demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment Printed Name Address Signature A-m0t4`(. F.7%URKAM 1-72 Doc., LEo 6w_z 'oris Lux>L-owr Lk)A 19365 , J C"" i304a+a JAIO bey t e5 L -0-h e- Ka<tA v►-et.- cse11 �4vuIZc9Qu l tJ� �� �� 1 4-c T tceiurn to: Hood Canat Coalition, FU Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 M FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We -demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Si nature 33 ` 1,( _`j(�_CIC r(C yyt B11. -V P- Pur Lckocu w QJA P4- L.u. _ C,M.P_), u.ft Luv_) w 410*/14 5611 "Fi T �✓ lceturn to: hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 0 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Si tune 7 ,l te V,� CG I'LL Return to: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name •�� ,g e f+ + rffl®1�.�1�d�ArAWMAIrm ■ xeturn to: Rooa canal coalition, FU Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 4 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the, public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature 15St-"' -Kick_' d i� v l 'l.� lc �c.. ✓/ PGL/�-7� Y/4 /0 R e, . e- 119 PO 1I VY 6 1 y I ' u 1i C e Ks L. 216 /! ,E ; cv Return to: Hood Canal Coalition_ PO Rnx 65279 Pnrr T.,,rllnw WA 98365 P - FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment Printed Name Address ignature 4 + T�Ny { B4 DC3G lS� tAte �Ei iVt: PORT Wb ow WR.1$3SE �D,i,o 4 Au ra TO -k- S" 15z � �c t �� L W LOA- q� -3E>E; Pok -r 4 U D ko w, '?F3&5 <2991 JC�("b0r`ott 3� GreIE.nUI�eLC ,,"O, b xeturn to: flood Lanai Coalition, YU Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 � ��� T��� ��6 �gll�� PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE CA'V� 7 N1 a �` ct < PT ' CSL tYC- jo���� %I �i AIF--;,AM5 5T n- �64t(QA P C ►�L I l y0 v 3—b VP 14 o E E -6,/1 6L sA- 1 �4Fj c2r) 2-& 0 5 r K JD �o Z 5 Z Lr J L;(A v c_ w1 S 4;L- V6 C --- 1)1N & s z�� �► s c� � s7-' ti� Au" LVA J) PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE lia b e 4 � VI— 3 3 o s6l-1 L K ,: �' �/r Gv r4 i t w ✓ S f3a C Aje yve - �'—'1An ellel 67 �0-n� 7, 2-6, le-, - 6L A , Jots vts(eq I i �1 e- a4A &MA CA r;��► SoN 332-S Me -W '(5- PT 1-� AA.0 lot cj�&W%W.IA tile- S, fly `? 3&E5 lea 12°iK- 1-71;20 !,ICC J to \P 6 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE � J�U O l / I T 71 T� i�,r , 1'T WA S a1 r) Wyj r Fr. i -!Lem v At\)tjoL.,i 7rc.E ;t3 Lf of -o st- r�& Le W i s 22gl--2-- Com Lauv-, 6yaA(ta v, 665 50 St PT V"^- e L5"2- 3 cq.s s 10'774,,. l �i�/3G a. � m PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT 'PRINTED NAME11' ' , mpWdUlwam I 1 I +•l!� ,cam r � . �.� .rl t :.��::� � �...�l •�— /�Ier EARN ' s PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESSSIGNATURE ?- l(o , s -q -cf s �3-sts IS 2.13 7 LJ as ►��-� i,:* FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public, rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Si tore AACMJ ?z 7 f � 1 f i o P�T�Jc_ �- n Pip L. —5'C)a0-7A ?_23 tI1417 IW LU111 w. 1100d Cwml Coannon, ru tiox b.)279 Fort Ludlow, WA 98365 �1 NI FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name IA t,VkA47`- I'1AM'%-V� Jo &,; Address l tj iaL' p P� 30,6 0 4ad lock . wAqtn'�,_ Sr, FO(5> -acG pe -w Mcx V Jb- 4 $33 t Return to: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 F. FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature Sl 0 No ..4 Dpvi:—: E ua t N �o�"W.p1-0UJ, Wk I g 8 ltJa. �3L -1716 ZA'/07 VC -e- P boy lea a L P6 r Returnto: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 q ---1 —e c \ Gam: inn -?OP 11 n U) AyNC-- -�. (:gu,J LA 94m -e5 S, Akd i (yAao-t- e 5V-VDl o -to- s I,. k l y S+rime. 12v SE C7I ttC, LJl czb S 4 R4 R v c c&7�24c _kr�► �xCN1fr,,�.�-nom, t,JA g8�1I y`D lam,- SOuerda Ce �/f'3 Q -o . 6a--� --? sy FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address i nature C,V J1I PV &, AD, 2-07'T CANYON AD � /W more- o, VVIR' Q 93'70 (� , /"•J. 41, Return to: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 N PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name LLO_ Address 3o `'i Li - Si nature 1 J3�Hy- 1Z�� AUS S q?� 17'7 �. FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address m,Q Signature enYe_(( !/e 1f�Cc�✓� �SIS�c lr�ii �T37,:9 �r � , II �� VQ.rdua� ea w•[ a t 0-0 pw-rma t . zs86164&9,& 141.Nw 'Pogo o Return to: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. FPr�iffintedName e LtrV A(dLdress ,j sc Signature L Ilk .� r• r �r,G ,. Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE SiasPraJ?, nller4od 96- Hc P 2T u dcu uJlt 9 s �saf4 tit �� E,. 4 Z Mc./GC 4► 2 i � r4 h 72- T `r �ci a►--tJ��S NA -P6 v c.s & a AfA. �3 i FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROTECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accomodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address ISignature P% ke G� SC-c>Aie r a//# u/ /i'� /BSc trAb /ev,•Fw fJiy7 ���� .q-t/� 7j:--34,- turn to: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 P6rt Ludlow, .t- 1 0 PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -10 -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project *e deOwtating. The environpunt and wildlife will be tbnateml Hood Canal will be opened and massive pollwion. The Hood Canal Bridge will cVerieV= additional OPeW* and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly incrtast!4-,'ToVtism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected o ' fficials accountable for making decisions based upon the long tern. benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name �te PPrinted Name Address Si time (7 r« j <i& Ock'L) W j0 CA-6LPS PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature Oq��.� f� ;,� Ro //' llld 24> - lk-Ae��51 ukx J PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE ERS 3 *l L?Tz.u; Lit 2D .. ►� ' `� SNF SC4e-r-yk u-4 go Ifo G.% s Lo , GG 1 1,, ., I S6// AlO Gr ),n {5q MM 1 Flo r L(�► 619)( �. w �%��Si f � sa Lee, W"4 Al 6V13 e cva 9�38C� 11f21�14,1'�� �kt C���j►�.- j��aZ �U/��5 /-TVZIU tST r2� - �'r',3 C ,� !�� � �ir-'a- �jGw�"` � Com✓ A • � v'd" --- .` iP3 via Li�v (CIL PETITION STATE ENT FRED HILL MATERIALS P� OPQSED PIT -10 -PIER .PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to cavy gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Caul will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and z protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment Printed Name Address Signature iw� a � 9 S37o V I't 3C Pau q b spkoq-)�3 ©�L Z') PEJIT 0 STATE�MENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROD We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and z protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment Printed Name Address Si tore LD 6e�� ye ,vled &,y - bo LO flu SVVa N.w. C:-LG4lo'trtJ4� B 7-1 PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPQSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Sigmture 1 T!S-ft'UeAlfG'q 1015 d �T�A 9x'37 O 1 3.2/ j 4bo Rh PoNtsi � jI -J O tmS �3) 0 / *-00 40 Pau trR4 e{ pxlly— A JZo D E . CoN cru 03 IC 7'3 5' A40 /� z►l� N ---9 PETITION STATE ENT FRED HILL MATERIALS P&O.POSED PIT -TO -PIER PR CT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and Y protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment Printed Name Address Signature V\JUQAAkl& I/C14 041-4 BIZ, N vJ (5 f14-- Pew',; PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY SIGNATURE '000�� � G her d 2 c IC�u,,S�11 -3 1 3�jtZ � 5'� � ( /"/,4 d �2 '? 2 S ST, .I, 1UNI, Lo JOan a G ISI a� �i0nv�e PT, ST 71-9 a /' " ill q 92"74,,,, st p7 '9 PC) 6-1t pt/yct 0-f 1-39-U tfocdov Sf pr CY3c�- 6,0 poi f f-�Q d l oG[�� c�/�- 90339 14, M. 4'W Return to: HCC, P.O. Box 65279, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 J PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY SIGNATURE K � Lar5on aas NAazw e U -P, !/G�' (/1, G r 1 ►►�vV-�� � X11 �O S�ErI'�GV� � l , v 13 'bS-1 �af i� Nkc 1 alcl. 70 S VA,,\c re ^ S� Ii III M CIAMjVC? /1l AfgSS ST T. or)ciy � po 7a4 k 01 h i c,e� eU�� �2 -' 3-7 r-� 5T P. -T. OF am i� Pao &C A2� - '� -717, �T AT Gt pnd Y-0 5 °x 2 � ar,( Oro 1C t 44, C6��Y Return to: HCC, P.O. Box 65279, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 f� PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY SIGNATURE -7/0 /_1 has" M,cu ttek .Sb (0 c Lt� 5 �. PT:19_�ZS 4( 8.$339 6 ror�f 1- �2,6 _ Keturn to: H C , P.U. Box 65279, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 J FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an i 100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature ,,�r�//P D Sl z o �j6 z�i I e 11 ,��+ 7y& Xojen adders f;'oz404 ° 6;1 64 Sk - Z -t 2.0 A< ``s `t'MV-1 SSS ��tu'� Return to: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 �J PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal., and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. rPrinted Name p►ddress Si t re 4-aon u{nbL oo 430 MoA me �� ) _ �_� � low ( ... I j �� (� IL10 �l 6iS 1v� � v( IL� 7 Ly A S PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE a `l Yi 60 v - r si aI�IMptc 911r& 6 I`- v FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature gv'l 9 #CAL 01 .J�O'i�5 CL�,cttis clO( kA, Return to: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY SIGNATURE O� � 'q--- C-0)(' Lk -1 15S* ` p �-Q t•7 1 ++ V Q irJ / s- zip/ E q 10, IN Id dig f;zo Ee-KAE-'c /6 z li� i4j 70 ICU yDl��� �. Por L,. i AV 14f-1 Q z i •mac 84-7 K4 —,L) \ ? E—:, I CD -5A ox-L�c- - 4� N \ ,, ; Return to: HCC, P.O. Box 65279, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 � � v 7 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY SIGNATURE Manu ��r►ni� n-2- C.rP. k- ����- �-��: w,� �-��y "� , t? v'l C► rA �-k-Y�h- f�t� t. Calk- 3 31 rz Lv L4z Return to: HCC, P.O. Box 65279, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 !p V S— PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected o'cials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature &y��� - - af7121- EJ Jr rt — �✓� /r Ovwr-�J0-15 i W Y� -JdcrJiJ f� �K'C' 25'1ol #a -I' I'd r TtyA Yr�"ZJ l�•4 10-23 V'AN nt cSS Arp--!� " Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 i PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and _ protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name • .. _. , iii i WE THE UNDERSIGNED OPPOSE THE FRED HILL MATERIALS' PIT TO PIER PROJECT PRINTED i NAME151 11' r 10,y.1.l�z 1 �► ► .. . !,► 1 �r, ,t i IN sill INcy. ... � iM .1111 _ _ _ 1 �► r PETITLQN MILNE-NT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for'a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment s'✓ F.T. RI �Wollfq.VAN Rt ). -tai• • '!x'.11' c�►� r� � ,I s'✓ . y or WE THE UNDERSIGNED OPPOSE THE FRED HILL MATERIALS"PIT TO PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE ` - 4316 . PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature ia �-�- 5�'c�hr afran lye. Ia4 5+-. 3�'emer � uJR °1831 EMeCU rYt Wl �� S98',3S3 I .O tic 9 - ibIaM I,6,5 v J Os�'I?1QY`, L�� Ccll 3136o i,?rern�h LLGI'� Gt>% �'�'J jb OM 0(_ WE THE UNDERSIGNED OPPOSE THE FRED HILL MATERIALS"PIT TO PIER PROJECT 111 9 / s � r � i i 1! 14 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature --tamoY &2t St y' S 3 b ` p� 7-ea1US&aJb, W4 qr' tilrzct� �. N1�yEr1s �fl�a c'r'oF- 6�VW,,E t? 3 4o NC- CCtV r&R s7- �..�. A'r_y� ,5tLQLLAMiLsfl, (�A 98392 Returnto: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 'M FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature �r`Clticlf5l�n Ski IV, �a�J s_, ii A Ry i`. +IV a V � 3 � `f�'s� too R, �' �, W1 ► . � Keturn to: flood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 bort Udlow, WA 98365 PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature c �lsr�p n �oaCl s,R" y e 15]- CA4'1-w� 1='a! 6 -Li Sl# ie I- v vi Skj# R r? r) n �vq [.A 11"e & Cfa,I 3L-, P% PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature Pry iso ->, PO- Q601 T Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 3V PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE C+A,t t Z L6 5P6�tl /0lZ- 61-41,V15$� jor tto � 33c� �/1v�Cc�-ror� �`- 5'1 c� S'6 � �► S � 11 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature UI DaC t , U T Return to: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 5 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature LO RT xm i�2 I'a � Return to: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, W"365 oil- PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY SIGNATURE Lee KATZ f0 A ty 8 3 / :�-aA ©weo'g 1403 t r, VOr c✓ o,,� Ill ��� �,r pr ,tom e�evi �a-a-rlfZe ��S- u �, d f f -VO ocj I fit ► { KA _ G-� P Return to: HCC, P.O. Box 65279, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature ��d �ur,-,•,�„ 7.2��r�-tom l'� �i 72 C"'_ C' r'L ./.cl_d(L7'-_� 6,11517t4 Se haneker �e-IZ ,dlo ev n.L_ TT 1 nU«.uii w: Hood canal Coalition, Yu Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY SIGNATURE a �uov-6S " 39 1 " �v v F7r 1%01 Kukly Sfi. xeturn to: HCC, P.O. Box 65279, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 3 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment Printed Name Address Signature i 1 ��� �^ I �l ��, � / I `� �C � �l I c� ��C1 %���'t-, �w' '�l � •) � � y�, ,,. 1 I' I p � e urn to. Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 17 nNov i a *Zoo z_ o� PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME �tJ/,Ll��rl /uFr' ADDRESS CITY Sd S'b - /,Z 3 SIGNATURE Return to: HCC, P.O. Box 65279, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature L044 He) PIPM (,5P INN Ave Nr JA 93 1%1�c1�� c ( 17�,.� 1 -cc►-- 15_H N.N IYO` 3r )G rl r5%ir« I'�tn 5t0 '21 lvc , 6eNJ.u9,H�1 oy.5 (,t-r��A LO a05()C,3 SEIS i'"t 1��40v-, U.) A ct &o t 1'6,�,z� ,fie J LO . Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 7,1 Troy 10 ZQd 7 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS P,LJZPI�M Pf4N GcJA S/\c;/\c' J-,dy�la-V""Wt t4'Kd-ar6c*, CITY SIGNATURE WCL 9�p�-:7 P08 boq& 44, W4 ago&d 110NI..I PL-Acc -SsA aVA N W.A`1�,021 �`0 Cc- vFeh,�Ocxxa 3I,3(A, StJ ossa �C �t , 4 30 -7 • 93 J �RU� 1l/ E- dgUa5 Uh t 99'o Z7c7(r� (9tol" �4- Ab" L dun !C be)lewu, 6/000 C i Z Z /V) iL- T Return to: HCC, P.O. Box 65279, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 o J FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a -4 -mile long . conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 4400-foot- cbnv904-foot•pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature i� ��'�(. i� Lv . t l_�- 1 L.�(L CL, � (r�ll�u• v-�_�` �G) 1 (C�t�V ���c. `: 5<;'-�.� ��'_''�' L\VLLUII E0. nuuu Canal Coantion, ry Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 -a i h ov it Zoo?_ FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. --- ---- - --��� - =µ. %.vauuvii' F-"nux oJG 1Y YOrt LUCHOW, WA 98365 _FS 7 Nov In 2,007 PETITION STATEMENT We the undersigned strongly protest the FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT we feel that it would be detrimental and potentially disastrous to our environment. PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY SIGNATURE S A) e c)d 1.,x,1 c rI calaw << < < , Out C2e v baa Ci�JC� We, wu✓� � 3 i �c e 7Z L�,� .gag t 9' 4Vy y I'J'A.JA /11141A-1 r � 11p, V FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne byi;h a who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environmell Printed Name Address Signat e[J lql 'S ka') J nr �/Jn ✓G' , /�" L -Yl IAC C �c Ct 1/e Ice SC 0 T _ 0 6 4 L,,,+e kc.� Keturn to: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY SIGNATURE u c) Xe Vecu MARI 6W, Return to: HCC, P.O. Box 65279, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 HOOD CANAL Petition Statement "'''"` %Mo" Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email '�_ti signature ...,CRxt. g, e'(1 L4 Pr. r ,C_kDri W Gtc 4Aa-lporj., \\/A cl833s -�bshee�s�ctt►w�c�.k,cor•+ It t8o'2.. ., C. ��1E owt.1 too Cr- \\)AM* Ti�on,.�d� kms. QoAA , Poe- /N.T 2$83 "Low, wA , Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE co H u_tQd, ao,r L4,dlca I& ks R6r3Exr D. Ckn.Ir>,h,v ra.� /'o !3 o x 6 s'y r'4 - �Z�c -70 tom' C L►LU 7� X76 P,v [� r civ= .,_.. �r F b�NA/ C whwiv TA `2s Oot,44?,f/ v x(` r yy�� ti6 c � a�p,rfi wr►��sAA PO,4,t f6IV r furl— j'cu.v1S���� (c•�l 9836E .'P:�i?�c,-zvi i��i.�2�z1%'�.� )� Ke Irl h L— 1� �f H-ti.\, co N j�q c7 )0 Z-b?� 1(4 1� �' t( � J l i � id _ (A.J N ,C. u �L PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 51sT S f' u, l x 7 .ZlLlt,) H. CS-rE5 I0D dx �V 7 4j —A�L V o v -T- n hc1, WA \, � A1C �o0--t— T� N6 t5M�, 2.�j ( l �(� L� C. trt fz.� �t 69Zb6-72 ---P Tg 56 6 v,, 7/7y a e d 0 r -I e L- PH 45 N I 1 11 1 1 1� PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature hI eY� e.�e 6s .2, ,JV i ./ PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature fV\Ywf 11, 4r 2FOX i PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Si nature �t r,] ,YOx 6S.a79 HOOD CANAL Petition Statement -� w Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email /) Sigrature „ o Canal Coalition Box 65279 rt Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalidon. orq 5 �(10 B"'AlI +� ilii_►` I la "'." L A. � / I"117 qw- 'gomi Kom CS.0'm / �.1 � �� =_ o Canal Coalition Box 65279 rt Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalidon. orq 5 PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature J�3e,r wn� ��I1l,l c l Doti lti� C $` ��oS l vv ,a L L SCA ` /q r/� 11 7S J2n-D0 1-477- lJ V0`ev Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature =fq6YIU*q alP�ia-S "t �P-�lA %'��-t�r�`xx�-� �iR-�tY�-rot•-� �t83t .. ����it,� �t� �IC � nick#-6W'7I1E14eJVYhrJVJ ems, ���ef ; e--) �� /e � e HOOD CANAL COALITION Petition Statement Fred hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email , , Signature Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq 2 9 7/ 7 r5' cmc �� bv- ,��=• ,% lJ a 7 A- -- — G�— Jt%f;l rokp .7,9.70 f 'l ��� �� l Il/c'- u x:9/0 tri Y' �1/� MZ1 S, A4Vt 5 Z f7Z7 0-46Y,04, NE 13ear� 1>..r k � c u• W� �T0 tiL� ZW Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq HOOD Petition Statement CANAL '' Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge./ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature �oR�lt�� tJ✓� i �rIG��R Z��► cLeveGHri-P Sf -- pTw+��3�36� 1=1NY1"14#t UJ# C N1�ntFi J� P� ilof- Q V-*mC14.7�'�uEIw . NT B• NV"^ �.N ry Sri A� 1009 _2clYl Fc t—.T n w,v 5E IVADO r nn rZ /Duj�)Sc't�). Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq Printed Name Address & Email Siqnature Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. org Petition Statement Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project J `( I IN II I 41/u • ,r t �• a9S �r¢er LuNe �� S v S! �,4 �4 ' 1JkWVLA, � d fc g -�,,�so �✓ 5 TOR r— -7--0-t, AJS,e-A1b h7 �o X No 116 1 �e u i �t llJ 3I �a,,Mse How c4 r -A. s t-• WPB •a%3�02) — VIS t 0 4- R.e1 C4L I��v wto�-Ii w,A, qkI if G a ,.,j 44 acGL -'Ttzu� I/ (-m 01 00, WA j,, C-bri ec., W i o��f1'iCir V1, q-762. REL6 JT t . f C� o Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. org Petition Statement Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project J `( I IN II I 41/u HOOD CANAL Petition Statement Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq n h "J, Eu! ba It t;f T: -- " A Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq Printad Name Address & Email Signature Hood Canal Coaliti P.O. Box 65279 Petition trtement j\ Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanalcoalition.org Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project 1. ►t — 4 :. 1 % ►�� v� L -r , �J� r t+�'si� 1't�.l 11 "nil !I h 53 (3±7 ddnLC SL ST LO A�Q CAp-L NomURA _ I Ole (e p-�-_ FJ, �D LI) 5 6 %DJ/Lo/ , l ( 7c, zo `c b 1%,e DcAANam L \tj, \.AJ a 0& G 70 .61 s ,� �s 6to o ►" «>., R VL ,-,r k tLJ 1 o JW\L�YCrit�U�n}(EaC�w�(�' ( q) - C9 S c.�J ��?6AA, Z2� ( 00K C� l 3�fV� r, 156 %/(,� //�?r 15uu `4 �r t Hood Canal Coaliti P.O. Box 65279 Petition trtement j\ Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanalcoalition.org Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project 1. ►t — 4 :. 1 % ►�� v� L -r , �J� r t+�'si� 1't�.l 11 "nil !I h Printad Name Address & Email Signature Yt�ee I f'c� r^�r v29 ° 3 B � �3r Al oth- IJ6 o f A- c_- DOM YJ�. K Z4LU / %mac c k Y, U,,, v 4 ! wA-q 17D �rz -tvt C4 a U)A S(J �o F3�c (36-7 7 A -C/4 op rilc A A . :1 T7 AJ a •d-7 P3f:"14c 14 0 R JV Pav c s'rfo WA f e f 76 44,e' o ll HAP -0 iD u L..5�s WA-J�3 ems--�j c, p C Z"A al -l' C4. -" .� m�n�n 11 oP clu 1-�2_ 2T 17 51 t e 6#/(,G VV V— PRT DAVIs Z 9 7a7 H DRIYE (�0VLSrio Gc%14 � 310 ' aa�-)3 �3�1,:Drive I -- Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Petition Statement Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanalcoalition.org Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project V� I I� I WE THE UNDERSIGNED OPPOSE THE FRED HILL MATERIALS' PIT TO PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE Jv �' �lw , J' U,'1 �/U 9 2� r ti ✓17/� Sw yJ vG (,0 K�l PC Cl vl o. 5��, � 1,19i4� An6glzo- Mai�n e-- lu coIn a (o J kaw v-,� L r i ( san WA 103»- 0 »--1,5 1,5l q J S re ( oho 16 GVAr 'IZ (AJA I lo 3 L c4s ion, OAY PJ ort kutsitow. WA Wt - i 1 1' I 1 II 1 '� HOOD CANAL Petition Statement -�%-O Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanakoalition. orq 5 �tlz - f� N 1J9_j� Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanakoalition. orq 5 Printed Name Address & Email Signature Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Petition Statement PortLudlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanalcoalition.org Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project irk 1i�� l 4 0w o Qc�are.r o �. epv �. ��d1oa� q@,�65 �� J ll V Z 1 ✓1 - �, �' E:Rfm4tG fPaQDUr> r�2z io3 ST �� mpte.01 Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Petition Statement PortLudlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanalcoalition.org Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project irk 1i�� l �A� Petition Statement Fred Hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Sianature Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq , iu � 1 h�3 o A/, % ac/L APt r i � , &I q c-abocJ-6 ,-- 64�_gCµ Doe. 140404.) W 3a ya "LEE M6now5 1011-5- 11Q L I 1,J LV A '1�e' aXrOS-3OWb n Z lS� 1 1�ouLS B o t✓A 3 70 iA r»2 /,1vE- r Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq , iu � 1 Printed Name Address & Email C.innAtimra , Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanalcoalition.org e L Petition Statement Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project im M V - L4, /0);vk) OAT14E-6/Ave 7 eoeac-1-1 P er- vrc io,# a1261 in 44 U) IVA,37- 3 S/moo`43 ea-ek Dr - p gG� /-,:,c CJA� (41 ZUA 19.365-- v, "7 kesll-�e, A, / Jelso, 1.3 U t/11-6 L> WT -Z, Arll e, �/ �� f-/Iv� Z-Ullevd r S'3 a CAto PC" (Menerr;Iq,..q 11e4C1,10-,t7 Iva rree2wa%, Al ZL c 1, V 173 Z 110 A Irr, Af Z, ,,p MAI-PUR,10 eA4 Post Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanalcoalition.org e L Petition Statement Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project im M HOOD Petition Statement CANAL Fred Hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name,- Address & Email Siana re Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq D'qvF;s�+�,� a5��© N> q Coif D N Er-�RNsV_ _LL Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq HOOD Petition Statement CANAL Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business or the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature 11 J, 'Cc:>,i)3'J h IVE C cr �-h r'�`�-tic (L-4 ��'$' '",�G' T v <<�.�ll .- CSC 4 ark __ /wco/ G 1. " r L_�)ca 1 gh''l 7// Cana! C on P.O. x 65 Port Lu 98365 tang oa d6n.orq 6 5 � PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and - protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected ofFcial.s ac-Mirtable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature ,390 . le" ;,e-. MAcf� 6aYZALX) t*l to Vtp tUAT- , 1 n cI CA, 71 a7 714-ar-LffaA (yl✓d. -V � n e �j�t I% L k QrrLtA - 4v4 -PO "v -)A td' w --T,q7Iv,,L t o t q:r- m .� -<� P� s0,9 -t e0 (e c �r? 0 7 Gw J A; 00,u +; 7'iG.1. if L &41111 S PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE /vw 5/lve-r dAle-, WA 91 3 6 3 AlIVIF Pa" ts 6o, Q Y570 0- GS- 8-e 0- c- S- Aj I 1 7-1-;?— V S14. p-j�4 \4Vi j:)o NV VA 14 /VD v m 7 tL)4 20 ..Ire F.Z e. A: lek- / 0 ? / 6 w- ZZ;, 3� 91 Is- D 4V IS)(- ^JCI./ "/Cso VAkA '7't 31 C-Lrav-a.-Alossof.- � u- U- klAwk CIA %,Vll- �L ��l - r� �, �-► ivy �� /1 ` �34� I t,;o �J- lAt&j� s r ci v-<- A E re tit, ll 14 0 3 Z fl -,,7- A. IAT- A 6 A147' Lax q F4C ec--,ex�la-Le�� Printed Name Address & Email C;Plnm+.,..e m rJ sr 5c�►-rte;• LJ,4 -98/o-34J J i KA, IN c s Q n l7l et /v to T -,a,1, o fid, Pe w.,e,-, CPP'?,la Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Petition Statement Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanalcoalition.org Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project 3 �A� Petition Statement .,,%""�°•�"''"w!"°,r Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy, We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email si nature How canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq IPA U I 3 c�c.c 9 MoRrbe (�V'V\lk VV" 6c'o lei 1.2 3q C-. eit e r-.- ,Pr f, How canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq IPA U Printed Name Address & Email Unnnturn 'P�Aq, OFF >i 72341 km, •M rM - V G01 9tlz Z- C c3�� � l lit—IC 9 �,/Z- XItfc)& TV ZRHC=4)�0 kJ 11113 E W16 0 6 ,6v, G� S -t, I Q -CZ Pill a - ,. Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanalcoalition.org Petition Statement Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project HOOD CANAL Petition Statement . Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature Y t e, e o iq . _S L k.Y-aL 16CC .� �`�'�1'1't-S L � SHr�- `� .� v 5" N W OAK '✓l l� al ►'((' f6l f0 -A Lq e; ie� o✓4I Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition.orq Name (printed) Address Signature h, S1'ei nL M IAJW s Sf e VJ,Xdl'nVIIf2,14 S",.- 7,?/ ",.- A WA I t MfM I 7,?l d HOOD Petition Statement CANAL Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq p n' /4 v c Illi Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq Printed Name Address & Email Sinnntisra Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanalcoalition.org Petition Statement Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project ell I ,� S LI--, � � ' C000nF - US?")n Z.3- ouesav, �/f} t Se�y7u .,,l�yJ ?two r2 ssd Of xSo )�-- .321" t"Cl %l t.' I �> )&. &,41 E. A• tvv\ ,-vi-3 101 2-11-%1 `^ .,Ny FP6 4 WA AY 041414W Z4414 Pv 9 AA06 G Fk v�G PL LU 144.190 Y*E C. ✓s/v' 11311 NC aa�3a s.� 3 Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanalcoalition.org Petition Statement Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project ell I ,� S LI--, � � ' FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT' We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who snake the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Nan►e Crizi- -� y N ObM pbubbo� Wq MM 1 Address -�— i S' -- ---- ---- - - i w Return to: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 5 J e'�Vv a PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to colistruct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. } Printed Name Address Signature o A tv • iti •� -1 L cs: 2 F_ '� i,� ,2`t � Ow �y o3;= � � � �� '� ITLA 1,lt�n �u-`i �S w✓ ro � � P 14A F( �•�61 � �vKM �� 1 j J 4 HOOD Petition Statement CANAL Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rattier than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Sinnnti m a Hood C iec-oalilioo /0/ P.O. B 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq h l (v f l mt �' � C�b�`� P� � �3 � '`a i� CJ Qri �v/v�► �� �yJ� , � � -l"!lZeI4 /110OLC L1 r7nC ne- l tail c as y S-3 -- 4.1 t� . a���_shers;e Chd-rrw�l. �)v . Ail,. Hood C iec-oalilioo /0/ P.O. B 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq �A� Petition Statement Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred FO Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating, The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Sinnatsira Hood Canal oa mon P.O. Bax 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodtanakoalition. om HOOD Petition Statement Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodat4 yp to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes,, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Ci06a%M1...- V�q "F'A) U V 73 0 C sew�Aw ��/✓'/ r ', pp� ('e, so V\0_4\C0p-t A <r ?(� f g�tJr✓� �,c.��v,� 1a6 lj�iy�oT_PT C' /�CM tA v -a_ 4r 41�L I Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Baur 65279 Pbrt Ludlow, wA 98365 www. hoodcanakoamon. or p 4 Printed Name Katk� UIC, 16— -7 i z-- �4- St -i'" Address & Email Cinnnti.re Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 99365 Petition Statement www.hoodcanakoa%tion.n Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project Ful 70. aux III -foe-T ia , f)q LYN N (,om "'oma s2 `LE3 V�--- • P&J j 'O 6c -Y,, , I y C9rt Tn, tN �r EvQNe R� A �� �- �n�xtiw� 7 v( Ute,.Ok �T`G✓ S' 8 G 14- �Q aC °a � Gtr GCS t (� r to-- b �s� L, T %alar6 la �O ►13 4 if d� 1� 1 oc O� `ill a`cr�FjMirIL� l�Ps�Y� 1 t) � P7 c��'l�"�y Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 99365 Petition Statement www.hoodcanakoa%tion.n Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project Ful FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment Printed Name Address Signature 4ZT►rJ U f i C R IZoa, 6- CAN WA)F 9 T Qo r�' l'D w•-• d-�-c� . k(4 -i u h 5Cvzf ) W A- (74 `ter- -rb�QNs (_-vi') U.a b��A �/1 L�✓'��y�( %f 7 SD Y1 /( i� GPV t�1..1'I� -�-' �TBu1I�� Returnto: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY SIGNATURE M c 'I��Jw-�X• '&kf VaMi I AkV 5c-)c)q rNi" f �- L �� 1 OwhjCc. Je �-tk'rjrpop fi 50- , w- ST De'am)a MOM ANT 1 a �(►u st i-(Ald LA il��-I-� V So (• , r by *41xit e o�r �'c; ss'o 9 �c,��rr , P. T. (i return to: r.U. 150x 65179, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TB -,PIED PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature S�a.�► fVl Q -v. y.�� `-1-t 5` 3 �,t� �' I Iaw,ei+e Sf UJOk �i is i (08 �L�c..Qa..P,� 41 C 'f 07A DA,4.he Wood PorT d) Wkg?3 &P xeturn to: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 HOOD CANAL COALITION Petition Statement Fred hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The longterm cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature Jerry Gorsline 5282 Cape George Rd. Fort Townsend, WA 9836 9#fh MdCBarron 620$ Cape George Rd. Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq Petition Staftment Fred hill Matedals Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project lar � Lo t Hood Canal. Fred Hill Materials to construct a large Components of the project Include a large strip mine, a 4-mile"conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shares of Hood Canal. and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Mood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot baryes and 74O4foot ships. The curnulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife wiN be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to IndustrI4. ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bndgehhip accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected offidals reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment. canal, bridge. and peninsula ecorarny. We w:UI all elected officials accountable for melting decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the start term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email ^ Signature, �A` Petition Statement Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hili Materialsto construct a large industrial port complex on the shoresof Hood Canal. Componentsof the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot bargesand 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impactsof this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and businesson the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disastersare not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email . i , Signature Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Bax 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. onq a J 6 2 1,17e � eeep a , Ar - ,v_ E� U �4 � Gy-1 6:;1- s '4D COP SY _ �S u s 4 AJ Yvtq R e aa N yw(:YocTeti(dr o P4 = ft&,4, , k;39 �t Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Bax 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. onq a J 6 c NA° Petition Statement .w�� Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Siqnature A'"+ u►" `�• %17�tY�S�I i �l't Carr -yah n Lv�. �DoI't Lt�af IOw �! BaLS L-0015 �IL�lCl2.51"E (Aj ;P©zT LsJ9Cn�v, Qk 913 -- 135''3 `T't�a�e k3 cc E F7. Z c li" 1 _ �o tZ �- qty �s Cam Q$36 ' n 41- J 'e E sG/�/r! / ! f / d r`7 414C //✓D /U V, yyZ Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. om ANAL PetitionHOOD Statement ti Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materialsto construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shoresof Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and masdve pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this preoedent-setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the longterm benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The longterm cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Sianature TNRy 1. 3gz-01<5 71,3 0411n1we /2, dG6- _D2 Por_7-,L0.Z>l o"v wA 9,FXY /�"/ /zA 3C77/ Bleoe&r '713 Oc 1?&6e Z? TO, et-1LuL),I-NvCUA y8&S - - - /// ��A r 4AA)t FJ_ 98365 /� (� r /fi S74 ji4 t / i (i /ZMR �yni Jq AAMRIP G% C7� i i 1 RoSint J -Aa lr Pi- YM 71-75t- 619/- dfer t� ` - Nuigggr eo ot-P✓s • x/ Hoz ST % 0 3(0 8 pe be, -e WI"h 4,,fe Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98.365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq J N WoD Petition Statement _►NAL ,,.�;.•�• .� Fred hill Materials coAL,-r,oN Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hand Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq IJ �J ����i✓� Gc.1f� ` ATL r, r ts _T� . Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq IJ �J Printed Name Address & Email Signature 0 nE ,►K'NrT^ 4. HigcDo v,964 ,�-r . �rrc l�o;� ?8-3y2- ' � • ��' .;Z/ 9' j ��p,;�.r �►, �-,-cam' Q. %� nz �v�-�,. Hood Canal Coalition P.D. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanalcoalition.org Petition Statement Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project V HOOD CANAL COALITION Petition Statement Fred hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq (� �% AO e5 ,' f` ArL''i /A/ J1�1A GoL c� ,N i i 2A /l I A M,4p, i tIV /it Jrft0 t �t ELIf Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq HOOD .ANAL Petition Statement Fred hill Materials -COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Sianature Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanakoalition. orq b J y�rYyy. ";4 ',P'L �Z Ila, �'4wz _Rf5T1-y MEDL-GAII V �� �-o-w� Kcal /y�.�.Y✓ ,5 lF, Tk N,' �06 K /h t l61 y� Ol Com- Y C ArM LL r/'" �" `� 3 3J 5/�' G1it' Ci f s t J A /l�'Gi YS P a', (/ LVA ritA�l /9 un/iprr,e arc e �a-ii Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanakoalition. orq b J y�rYyy. C�� Printed Name \, Address & Email Sinnaturp Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanaicoalition.org Petition Statement Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project ;� 11, L/ � /� /� Ave P//e, e,.� ux)7L v yrs I )1�11 84 e,-- be " c W c KI' &tzgu2 I *111 qI'd S6 -,JO A/ 1, a o13 L e� Ebzz �fk flv ki '1y Wuu, Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanaicoalition.org Petition Statement Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project ;� 11, Hood Petition Statement CANAL Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Proje: t We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature Hood Cana Coalition P.O. Bax 55279 Port Ludlow, WA 98355 www. hoodcanalcoalition.orq ME 5 C G k0m 4 L ov k 2t3 l� C1 r r✓� C `7 amts T trcKS Hood Cana Coalition P.O. Bax 55279 Port Ludlow, WA 98355 www. hoodcanalcoalition.orq ME 5 Printed Name Address & Email Signature Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Petition Statement Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanalcoalition.org Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project I�✓ e V - 3 � �,1v. ,K Svc lG LAD A " � �/f JQ,�j f/, '. i(1c (�c1i1'IA• " / T7�'ryI �O c l� Gt'/� Z/2, f "S l.,.cc J� JY(. Ll • % � �D /J> JY�/'Jl��'cj � �j� �,Y / - ` n `. J—, -z ILLYA �-- �► � C� L /�.� YV �E CAM LVNQh -S& E,5 EN - a. ati�t'© W 0— A626 vr+w uj.4 /YJ Sal, u1 y Uk S (A / K, r8•rba.vot., (,oska-u,�rn ulA t S11tag c- Gc.�gr v Los ifil3�a-. ur.K w1i .oor Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Petition Statement Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanalcoalition.org Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project I�✓ HOOD CANAL COALITION Petition Statement Fred hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100-foot'by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature Nor in a, aw �h Z er ei- ioi x.sbe.4iqa(,hQ 96q bulrug;�)_V /A-reic R r EQ u > re'\ W, &,,-1,04J AIAGu .v S-iL i �•, RR SNE 12t1 XT 3o I 1}h E S 2 , Hood Canal Coalition P. D. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq N r Printed Name Address & Email Signature zo me { 5 gab -I�� �3l�A�l' -301 �`1l���5tgcjff �:- IE ; f) 5 ! r N,t- WCLQ ITkerc5Cx _se v- e, Lv J?)re�nda Lb.. Sau a jeane-4e- kav\t ;n S'Cgoini , tvY$4, � ✓1 �F� G) SAI w► t� {0a,0e17�,�— I '-&A WA c\/ � F93 M angy Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanalcoalifion.org r 0-2 9� A Petition Statement Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project Hoon Petition Statement CANAL .• """'"`'"'"�, Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature - // v�v 1,2N4 Tc -�Av 7�/m -�4t A c tc-`47 VY31— If Lf t ,-o. a Vicl-hru L. Nk+e 410 Jialai Wa S e 4 u i 'h 3 3 v �•t,w � 6Z� -7 N, �-ve lee a W Hood Canal Coalition I P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, wA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq a V HOOD Petition Statement CANAL 3'" Fred hill Materials W0_� COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature v Hood Canal Coalition P.D. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq rim 8'-5D'q '31.4'6 Abse v 41 J4A_Dee NA ld4li ^ PARI J S f/ / L Ltd 4✓t &Cti,Q_ o rylCkdro nk W i G /car S G �a 4C 4 A U �a r✓� 67-2 v Hood Canal Coalition P.D. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq rim Printed Name Address & Email Signature Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279Petition Statement Port Ludlow,,WA 98355 W www.hoodcanalcoalition.org Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project PczY Yn o s puz9 F A117 0 c,,<-, flu �) f-/ 4,0 5- Ul /-i lr- i rt se -"IIQOMrZdAJ4 DoAl 3 ���,v��. J wA ,n it Y %e f AllkOh—PA r eek lyv /1InciylF c.J� WQ Cl \fi e �J� '�l� y 1� � l I 6va,� ,CCci Al. 7Z�s /- C� Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279Petition Statement Port Ludlow,,WA 98355 W www.hoodcanalcoalition.org Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We, demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature A L C. 7 302 q,5 w kc 5A 4.5- 32 W.o AJE N£. 5EA-t-rL 9125 61861 -1 -MX qll'7r? 1(070 5AD6LZ--M0Zi\j 02, I,P MOYZ0051 O -A `�Zo6 .. ���-e��... - Return to: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 1.1 COS 3 1 1 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS MOM 9 Afl i►°� L. � ire_ . '' � . i Return to: HCC, P.O. Box 65279, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 l� FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Si nature OAK "C- 4c I k%Cc93fJ,.� Uf, 1�1 D2kre, Sa,l-es 1R �� K 3r �I )e- AAU a.Lsbn L ' tt) �ar�- /Pb 160K ;,q.2-5 �l-(vlr', UM q�s� fop P � %2O4 F N TX Y,r � S�s"l l C � Cd k,.A y Nw� 8CF.-si r-17�1,,v �vrr q931 JhGk, R V6609 37()? W,, CR IVEV N r, , T IfiVINI'- 7X J5062 tceturn to: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 FPY %7,\ PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT 1\G1LLlu We iZLL, r.V. nox ori i9, tort Ludlow, WA 98365 00s PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Si ture M Ic 6 (A OS yg $ r a� �,4 = f GPJ kA' X41 AE UNDERSIGNED OPPOSE THE FRED HILL MATERL4,LS"PIT TO PIER PROJECT tUNTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE cj a JA ee 45' cco b-Xl t cl FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature ;7� c Ste- 9 8�G8 T Keturn to: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and, an 1.100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships, The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment Return to: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than tlle short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Si tune IY14 K?C ft e`_)f' «�v � 5 5 Gu �c✓ 1Y 5 t t ,X10 lsc.- � 6 / 1 S S�-ti-� �-�i II I' _31.76 Creeia-hrra 0 rell � 3 S WE THE UNDERSIGNED OPPOSE THE FRED HILL MATERL4,LS"PIT TO PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 6645 k -4e -5V) \sorl 6-7 'Donyv, po rf- 0 rcha rpt, 1�/^ 57 Cr ci- Po,4 OrcAwei , p -c), Wil Tc, rrz PC. -a- ar&o'A locL xtn, 61.2 OiCkOj,-ci UA t i,?d'cf 7 -e -I c- f -s cn 33M 5!15Z c 1,-), QV I L-4 tc 9-0 cl ZAVV\&7 !#7 11 3 PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature 6s -o 79 j� L ria! /pw,F�.�6J— ' L. Hoop Petition Statement rANAL Fred hill ater Is COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships, The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution, The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely Impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature —�-- Od/7� /V06n n al7&dow �" F 00, $d G�LI..StfAva�C.fl �-'-e�- MO-4-n (9 -0.5S -e-, I I /0 Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanalcualition orq J U t-- Printed Name Address & Email Siqnature A/ PL C-E.c�Rc� 575{ C�►.19 W3 b:6 TN1}niC L.O �.{J:Ct+ _.-. IA Ku Russell Se. . ' cZ)IQjf'� PO QU K v'(O 1� COW�Sfrw' Vl1l►-��j ..�� OC-C,r. t.,z- 0 LAJNN / P.p ,jOK Q -T T6c vNS I AA 10 Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65Petition Statement Port Ludlow,, WA 98365 W www.hoodcanakoalition.org Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project v HOOD CANAL Petition Statement Fred Hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature —PO 00A \2c(J 71 "t L4 Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq V lJ 3 J { 4 ,j PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY SIGNATURE a�a M(�,rks 5019 Se 17 dWA4�� 57�V �v fiR Ks Soli 56 sr�RK '�rLa de 1121 Printed Name Address & Email Signature &b3 S Lbvtjt SW *.) A q.9110At 2$ 0 47 -pv�Ql WE THE UNDERSIGNED OPPOSE THE FRED HILL MATERL4LS"PIT TO PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE �, SSS � i �•� �•� � �►�� �'Lrvvo�� .�rd�-1�F5 �/✓�y�lt�2da� (`�A�06 I� S©� A -u U p, Tom- 96'0 A-4 F/'Fsr;9 I.IPZ- PIL- S Fl- 44i t� zC' CS�� cv/rrtk Ic sin 6 D R t c K 1 6 Mr�t-,i T 2 /'i��G' � l� L! `C-SvYj / �j'�✓7-t V!/� N � S r? � L�?"/cc`�5 .ttiJ 1/�j -��,�p � CAlih �e,l l kksor� PEON ,STAT MENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROSECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our envirorru/nent, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hon� a al cle-.ted o� �lr� is ract•al.: to le �fl-*' mating �A�+'ICiA�i based. upo the 1Vlf.i t+a,. y/1VVY13LLaGi1J �►vvV Vl 1....v.a..3 VVau l'i./a VY a1 iV long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment Printed Name AddressSignature 005A,tJ 7 © 7 SA REbT57T A / 11� s AAI1-4005, M q�ppq MAle l k yd ��A 1a -; - ; Q Rq PQ4I AW t; A�J �J kf ekc.1 Uf A i215q l��lLc�REcj 416"1 9e) 144 -Fe,. �,� *JL C 46I/V AIA k, ceq FIA WE THE UNDERSIGNED OPPOSE THE FRED HILL MATERLALS"PIT TO PEER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE - Pk t�L A, lig.,CA, 17 0 -7 2 1,7 Z't 5" � ,4Z --<14 /V /11 - )e /-7( Z-11yelvc-Al 15`7;7 - t, -c (C.c • IV. 17 �' �/! yup-.�,L <<-- -�: � .�,,..��- �: '`�✓ � I C7 CZ --J,61' <�,. 910 ILA Z-36/ -3)a ltil�l f2e FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature PAN Ie VjElmmt4 142' AWIC, Ate- t f d 'I'On e of Keturn to'.' Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 983 ` PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 1 Y/i a /, � f �3� C��J r'J� 5 /z f C� /ilii,kY A,Vx ro v �- � e- � /I �' (�Cr�.� ���•�t.; t,U'55 IL-1 61("c\f�\ie.• �C c�'�/yJ �1�ri�Q �, f�irM•� t i 1 Sal Lq ate. �Aci N �w10�v� IsLIY�i� ��1,"/� �l�ilU ��<.�,>:�u.� �`•"'�-E I �,'�� Av)-ty �J �J ru� t-e[(do i 7407 n 6,ww r �' I�� f�;• ;. _ 1. L . \ Cy; � } r1�� • �vb'� / I T y v G / 2063 ttin; hod k V �J PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature NE7 Vier'n fir' LUAC�-�-- C & 5+_ -id -I T, 33 Y" S�" M HOOD CANAL Petition Statement ;t Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq S ', ,Q 1 1 i+ � L--1 P 1 ` 4/v sTEN 0 1 mil D l Tt} ST PO/Lr C.vn��.,, �, �3 �j 8-36 ZC rS T ks ,, 1,e F c ,J k , w c-r�_ 11-104 Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq v PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signatur Flo,/o 0 4 L N '[L, Pick la yz,-9, I l�2►s�Eg�� I -- S yopo at D CO • � 8 tA C, r,--iA,l� Printed Name Address & Email Signature t` i- - % j'7 i�.Jr^i5 fiC+cJ GT oc�T L u d l� k1, CJ CL-' .3 r �,d r ,, � � C��G.Yl�1 N © T C"7— l '7 �oG�T Lc�t� L � G , 44f_ �1 OC4 N, c.-6 3v 9ade �Y� elle iC'rx.IJ .�d Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Petition Statement Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanalcoalition.org Fred Hill Mpterials Proposed pit -To -pier Project V' HOOD CANAL Petition Statement _•-— .• Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanalcoalition. orq ! J e 9 7 16Y r 1_opL v -Z R, Ao _JY mi w n, i..} 3 C PO -t PSG 2 L K) - K.-rtl �1.,11�IZ�2[. t.�lrt� Pt. �,�tik.a►. _, �,�.� �`1r� . ���ry� Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanalcoalition. orq ! J PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE F- , M4 IC_ ec-r—y i�2� e_r oTr —kLNI� �S- (Agzo(- A. �- ,/ 1 7s; 4 AG 0G 4� RD Cc�JPcV`c' Lzc, wi4� `C'u�3`� Luc c� i.iu . l.L�y"r'T l�S•.�C. > �� ! . ' I i I f I i i i r I f )b PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for'a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, hart rather by the puhlic and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature j— Vo -VICE- L. Ke- rY'I - 2 F;ncI-n i -Lu�l(a�, I/ �J PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature i '1 j �1c�3����—, S�1S �,�� Lafrry����,: I I i Printed Name f5;11 avk' q&LA -65 Printed Name Address & Email 26 L Signature Signature LO R is R �: tip► , G „w, . �} Y c6 Signature Signature HOOD Petition Statement CANAL -�- - {-----=- Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridgelship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature " J i' f C, l 1 Dv�r.^F 7 L / �,L �; , ,. � v4d�e � Com• P, -iii -t- 7L z 1.A.,74 Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq a Ar J PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature �X lcrer 2-4 y R Ker2 �Z >^,oc<i Ft. w� VO n n cz- L . Ke. it Y' J4:2 R nc k t.n Pt Lu�.i(e v Printed Name Address & Email Signature Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65Petition Statement Port Ludlow,, WA 98365 W www.hoodcanalcoalition.org Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project 11 1 I "15 2-� ' i • 7 . LA SLSrf &4" P. T-. . QZ — MIp221 FOND R�_ 1' I _Wn �Wouo @6q--,[CvtCR�,D- (T (0 0 0 PAS r-, 2-315 - -� Kr It "CJ Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65Petition Statement Port Ludlow,, WA 98365 W www.hoodcanalcoalition.org Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project 11 Printed Name Address & Email Signatu. e V614 Y1,U c.1� I 2p z4-wa*, 4W A (Wo YVNM &4 /&v /i Gl of ��'� �. � lC .r , ar _- h 011), Box(��� LA .'I Aq to, Uw L✓ (j25 mtmory Ck, T Pd 0 AI\ Cam C 2 /eS ��n 3'' VAO e.� PO4 Tr,,- r �17/9$36.g IiV 41��Zv-ao�-el �- P.2i,4'vNG i Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Por* Ludlow, WA 98365 wmv.hoodcanalcoalirion. org Petition Statement Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project Ell, C J HOOD CANAL COALITION Petition Statement Fred hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently ob''ect to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the` scores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject thi-, precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public r-Ither than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Sianature Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq (! Z-7 5A1r1C/.P Ryf I � � l il" - (,If!I A << (Tei aIds, q2� S-14. Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY SIG�NATUREZ:-ecl2 j 1p 2 ell Return to: HCC, P.O. Box 65279, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT—TO—PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature �--,-----`--- Lt1„lc c1u � Ic�►��, C�Jc_ ,l /` =� yl rc(k�,r�� -� j 7/ f Thr v:�> V, /& 9, I/ /%l da—v,�z4>0 lot f '83410 Return to: Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 't - vo,, 10 2a oZ Dec 02 02 10:12a WINDEMERE PT Printed Name VA-Nev y 5-r l au Di 40 cIO I \\ -ICA 0 Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hwdcanakoa ticion. org Address & Email 575 c,,Pr r41:--v4V Y--wa R913b6 w-rr i o*N c—V &UP'7L9^' M@��r SE 0 -ops �Spo Lo f -k �,`3 �o -�-,yW(\SenJ WAIN o T.O.3O)( 4q G Dr, LT-r(,.wNS�gU6, A %3 360 385 9345 P.3 ature n Petition Statement Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project 11 111 uivnn-C 7;)A7 •C( A'Ai ■s��-� Dec 02 02 10:12a HOOD CANAL COALITION WINDEMERE PT 360 385 9345 Petition Statement Fred hill ater Is Proposed Pit -to -Pier Proje We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a !arge strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by g00 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships, The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened, Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely Impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email -,Signature d/?e �.4al7e"17 e '°Y xf r I J -5A AJ /11 I LC -Z -P' Pa �56k ''o8 - Hood Canal Coalition P.O. sex 65119 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 WMV.hoodcanak oalition.oM P•2 I3II..L MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT, T, ` We. 'l?e undersigned, vehemently of?j-,, �:,t to the proposal by I;red Hill )Materials to constrtir t a large industrial part complex on the shores of I-lood ("ornponents of'the pro;cet include a. large strip mine, :� 4-niiie long i; �c.5 oi. Hood Canal, and an f _ � 1 UO�.00t by 900-460t pier in 1.101"d to aceorr i-nodate tip to 400 -foot barges and �'�W.-foot ships. 11.1e c;l.iant lative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and vvil-lli --, ,,vill he threatened. Hood ('anal will be opened to industrial.iz atiot? and massi_`,.y pollution. Tire, flood Canal Bridge will experience additiolia.l openings acid traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/sh.iP vocident will be greatly incre<ased. Tourism and b. is;.ness on idle entire i)coi 'tsufia will bw adversely impact,.xl. We demand, that of_,r �,�'ected officials .r, ,ci` this prececiect'-setfing and Protect t oc. t erivirc-r72rreilt, car_LLI, bi-idge., and penins ula e v�y' onoa v. e will ?ot._- al. cle, ted officials ac,o ntablF fet nmking decisions trled upc?ri the Hong terin benefit to the public rath{.yr.thari the sl?()rt term i :rnefit of a few. .The long -ter -in costs 1,f'envit-011-rnerxtal d;vtrster's (we not bot- ae hY Mose rvho hit rather• /' V the public and the envil-en"?i"' . �!'ririttc; Nasa,f: 1 Address Si;natur;; 2, Re!unz to: Hood C.n..�_ oalition. PO Box G, '?9 pr.O l.ud OVV. `,k'A 9,936D ---- HOOD CANAL Petition Statement wa Fred Hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanalcoalition. orq ?IIrzl ID'S Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanalcoalition. orq PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature 'E ii-zcL6t� P0 •�i��ers (k- Sir e.e-f- Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98;65 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 4, F( r el - E00 Ilea f ej I& Is�w g 354 F T I Lf 2- c- ICV e -k �— es st P To 7,- It'll k (:ZL:,; fj KtI ZL-c A -d L Nil q -t PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. i PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature U I vt�^Cs�+� _ G ?CX 6- S .: 7 9 7''7� L �s el /p �J , G✓ F�.361� PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature AA J Jti I PIL c 5-7 c1P T [ o� L� �"efurs. --/.: C.n,a / �v� /, �. o., /�oX 6S.� 79 �fvLc"e \-J tv fF�61' i PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature 1J•�v, �� r i Linc L OAS &LC41 t✓�t� w � I �l Af4o G�lt1/ ';Ce-/4fi/+ -�v. o� Cr.� r � moo' /, ii .J, � ,?oX (:, S.] 7 9 F7,' / Gc of /per , W �'J PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature 4LEAN OA y: s Td Ppm 3 l� v ���� �✓� " _ J�}�/lC� .l • C�h`'G(.��1` /��rf ��L�ICCt=jGL /� � 5- v 1 0 QV L�X� s c4 1� s' . C�A tit V A 7 ;"eft�is. -/�: r'o� C,�.r / �v� /, �i �� ?OX b�a79Gv�' r.?26T PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed :dame Address Sig -nature PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address I Signature ISIc R �<Srt-tZ �Z ] ,�3cL,�,1 Fr 1;,,►� 1/ C{- (� . E rY' - 2 F hc: �t �n tt L"Ao�,l y' Z o 4- -7 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE F— . MA, IL i-kt_�4�.11Q i7 1�eo�le �b'� C•g20L A. �c�4tcu i Cu J.lre lJ c(�523? �AG06r.; RD Cc)jPEVrLi-C,_ tUA 'TBZZ ? t a i I I r I HOOD CANAL Petition Statement Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq 'CF7 (\' �� ; v/�l t� V r_ st e-0 LO ,343 Lo Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq Printed Name Address & Email Signature AX/�TFr .�,. 3 v 3 � r2 - Aj ;��rz� C, k�e �, cam ► �i'Q- , _�. ✓%�iGJre�ri ��c.��� /��,c:�c�1lq� u�/f gP�w.7' ,�� i � V ��owG l % ! I.JII-SSV I F6J CT C� ljr,, P-7. lK a 9�o/,l RE��CrC 3✓ M0mJF6#n'Cr y 41 P4. 98 g ry f Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Petition Statement Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www.hoodcanalcoalition.org Fred Nil) Materials Proposed pit -to -pier Project PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address SignatW DO at�D 8 �� � t� � a � t vel a►�iW�1 of h of r1"ri e -H r- n 116W HOOD CANAL .•�..-.::moi COALITION Petition Statement Fred hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature /< C'4 &AJ 9��-T �qlL_110 )+'N sTEN (O � 1�'tt�1 D lilt ST po/Lr Lino,, cr id- Zo e Wn Le e". G ko Coe, `1 370 t, 17 ovb - 7 t; _e c� �v_ Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq I- Printed Name Address & Email Signature M6 trownl i3 f Lwtjt SW balkbl"fiL qew A 'A kill '3,9 P-.-0 .4 kilt) Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 Petition Statement www.hoodcanalcoalition.org Fred Hill Materials Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature 4 1103 % t C 4,4-f ro,Z� Lu )Lo&,1 tOA- N97 T1)rrrIdV 44 - ,��, '�C{ 2(1 PT L-t)L) ml 0A �S'-;45 � F�TT,w Se,c --- "C� "I, PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT—TO—PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS _ SIGNATURE 8 /z f IM Y ANiv e h e- HHCH �'�1�t-�i<(�Q 1.-, K�� ,act M �►2� IJ�:��. �15��1� ��1,'/� �lti�ilU � ��;�w� ��_. j L 17467 nt �I I. L� ✓, r, c� LL - I z v. i I !�vrrZAe- T y LIA✓L1 {L�..ar FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -anile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address Signature gN ie_ _Ak,4C4�1 14,-7q 0 _YNtPiC _A . t / fT- t-� A �� J4�1 �vd 1"�ohe eri��r Return to,' Hood Canal Coalition, PO Box 65279 bort Ludlow, WA 98 11 PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESS CITY SIGNATURE CA-,pwof ar6( mks hoc9 se, s*qk,-F--N4 x �7a auk M 4R KS 56 5TV9 'I1-0 d9 1121 Return to: HCC, P.O. Box 65279, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 ,.k - WE THE UNDERSIGNED OPPOSE THE FRED HILL MATERIALS"PIT TO PLER. PROJECT PRINTED NAME ADDRESSA/in p SIGNATURE A lle4L . - -7 V4,t4 . t , i�A, f Zo 0 5 &t 3 z v 's --<Al ',I ej - Z 1-74 5.�Oti � • Ll- A.-Ma"Z., 7 L z - 31)w 67 Z- AA' C L' Z- S j',FI W5 ct Mk, 7 T11 WE THE UNDERSIGNED OPPOSE THE FRED HILL MATERIALS"PIT TO PIER PROJECT PRINTED NAME 5ro4j,&t) "1v kp,JN '52iv1%°eif ADDRESS Is©� �A-u Dp. 'mar 5 -r,4 , Ce) 14. lbo f� Fr CA 42 i'na2�C� 6 30 . C>R R/7�6E, i+h Hell�lLson -��( k1l �- Cth�-�. Z PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to cant' gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold. all 'alec#ed officials accountable for making decisi^ns based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment Printed Name Address Si tune - / 707 S- a S AAI A,1A R, 4e.5, eA 9.Zgj,q ;q Rq. LZ I PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name I -M m toes �►�TJ Address Si 1857 �uAti'sc�v>i; PT hUDLO64-10A � 8 31 ca�CHOE L&. PCVZr LUDLOw WFC LI, 9 A/ A, 7-02 Z k 1 1') v L_Ot-J Z,)"f ?&L -' 7I OlcfellPtc /-f-) M_ 9�:f LGcel /QW, W-�7 F2.?6f PETITION STATEMENT FRED HILL MATERIALS PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrialization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term costs of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Adddrress� Signature V -6-k V,\!2 il 27r[�rl� YtJ. f"• Csy C./i-ia / �pti/, �. �.., z7oX 6.]79 �T L.�,t.1.lC�J, HOOD CANAL Petition Statement „ Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orp d - b ox 6.7 ClqR y lnlq t)PIAf t"'*, q 8353 ginavhtn �cG� . ne f- C.7 7T Somlk 'PA';V4- 5or�< j e le i o rf G Mrd lvia Gv1�F la �x �'"' e -o ? k '/a> � --- / AV LO PA- �f �' C/Cci/� fi7arG/Z�,01 �A Y^4"�cliYG�I Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orp HOOD CANAL Petition Statement Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature "Z) 4Z h � mss<� �� ., .�� �.� , ,te a bwl 7/) �_w --- L Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq I7 HOOD Petition Statement CANAL VIII Ifl rSff til Nll fail AIkF lryllll 'Fi�I Fred hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email Signature Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65219 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq YitAczIla 6. OLTC7i• n Il Fi�THJRNI)✓L-l"V,v2W,lk Cie Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65219 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. orq Hood Petition Statement CANAL Fred Hill Materials COALITION Proposed Pit -to -Pier Project We, the undersigned, vehemently object to the proposal by Fred Hill Materials to construct a large industrial port complex on the shores of Hood Canal. Components of the project include a large strip mine, a 4 -mile long conveyor belt to carry gravel to the shores of Hood Canal, and an 1100 -foot by 900 -foot pier in Hood Canal to accommodate up to 400 -foot barges and 740 -foot ships. The cumulative impacts of this project are devastating. The environment and wildlife will be threatened. Hood Canal will be opened to industrial- ization and massive pollution. The Hood Canal Bridge will experience additional openings and traffic delays. The potential for a devastating bridge/ship accident will be greatly increased. Tourism and business on the entire peninsula will be adversely impacted. We demand that our elected officials reject this precedent -setting project and protect our environment, canal, bridge, and peninsula economy. We will hold all elected officials accountable for making decisions based upon the long term benefit to the public rather than the short term benefit of a few. The long-term cost of environmental disasters are not borne by those who make the fortunes, but rather by the public and the environment. Printed Name Address & Email CGnnmtm ira Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. om itfit 'let e t i� 01C.On ����V►Ylil (��� ���� CN aeCok0e_1-A �ti� t Hood Canal Coalition P.O. Box 65279 Port Ludlow, WA 98365 www. hoodcanalcoalition. om PETITION STATEMENT FHM PROPOSED PIT -TO -PIER PROJECT Return to: HCC, P.O. Box 65279, Port Ludlow, WA 98365 JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC HEARING - Comprehensive Plan Amendments Friday, December 6, 2002 AGENDA 6:00 p.m. Opening remarks by Chairman MLA02-36 Michael Regan, Applicant Department of Community Development Staff Report Public Testimony Each Speaker will be allowed 3 minutes 6:15 p.m. or Later MLA02-232 J. Frank Schmidt & Son Company Profit Sharing Trust, Applicant Department of Community Development Staff Report Public Testimony Each Speaker will be allowed 3 minutes 6:30 p.m. or Later MLA02-239 Jefferson County, Applicant (Update Comprehensive Plan Language in Chapter 2) Department of Community Development Staff Report Public Testimony Each Speaker will be allowed 3 minutes 6:45 p.m. or Later MLA02-241 Jefferson County, Applicant (Glen Cove Industrial Area Light Industrial/Commercial Zone) Department of Community Development Staff Report Public Testimony Each Speaker will be allowed 3 minutes 7:15 p.m. or Later MLA02-242 Jefferson County, Applicant (Adopt an Urban Growth Area Boundary in the Tri Area) Department of Community Development Staff Report Public Testimony Each Speaker will be allowed 3 minutes Oral testimony procedures are on the back of this agenda. Everyone present will be given an opportunity to be heard. Before speaking, please consider whether others have previously stated what you intend to state and if your testimony would repeat what other have said. Please consider whether your testimony will add to the overall discussion. The names of the people who have indicated on the sign in sheet that they wish to speak will be called at random. The Chairman will call the name of the next speaker and the 2 that will follow so that they can come forward and sit in the reserved seats in the front of the room until their turn. All speakers are asked to address the Board from the microphone for that purpose at the front of the room. When you speak: * Begin by stating your name and address. * Spell your last name for the record. * Speak slowly and clearly. * Each person will be allowed to speak for up to 3 minutes. * A speaker cannot transfer his or her surplus time to another. speaker. The Clerk will start a timer when the speaker is at the microphone and ready to begin speaking. The timer has 3 lights. A GREEN light means you can continue; The YELLOW light will come on when the speaker has 1 minute left; and The RED light will come on when the speaker's time is over. If the speaker continues a buzzer will sound. Unruly behavior, such as booing, hissing, clapping, harassing remarks, or other obnoxious behavior, cannot be an element of the hearing. This is not a popularity contest, but a legal process in which facts and opinions are presented to unbiased decision makers. Emotional displays or undignified presentations add absolutely nothing to the hearing. If these guidelines are ignored the hearing will be halted until order is restored. PUBLIC HEARING PROCEDURE To assure that the "Appearance of Fairness" requirements are met. Friday, December 6, 2002 - Superior Court Courtroom CHAIRMAN (reads the following) Tonight's hearing is to take public testimony regarding Comprehensive Plan Amendments MLA02-36, Michael Regan, Applicant; MLA02-232, J. Frank Schmidt & Son Company Profit Sharing Trust, Applicant; and MLA02-239, 241 and 242, Jefferson County, Applicant. The public hearing is now open regarding the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments. This is a fact finding.forum from which a decision must result. Everyone present will be given an opportunity to be heard. Extraneous or irrelevant testimony adds nothing to the hearing and makes the decision making process more complicated and difficult. Unruly behavior, such as booing, hissing, clapping, harassing remarks, or other obnoxious behavior, cannot be an element of the hearing. This is not a popularity contest, but a legal process in which facts and opinions are presented to unbiased decision makers. Emotional displays or undignified presentations add absolutely nothing to the hearing. If these guidelines are ignored the hearing will be halted until order is restored. Does everyone present understand the rules of behavior? The Clerk will be recording what is said, therefore when you speak, begin by stating your name and address. Spell your last name for the record. Speak slowly and clearly. Each person will be allowed to speak for up to 3 minutes. We ask that all speakers address the Board from the microphone for that purpose at the front of the room. The Clerk will start a timer when the speaker is at the microphone and ready to begin speaking. Those persons who speak should be prepared to give to the Board's Clerk any written document that they want entered into the record. Page 1 of 5 The timer has 3 lights. A GREEN light means you can continue; the YELLOW light will come on when the speaker has 1 minute left; and the RED light will come on when the speaker's time is over. If the speaker continues a buzzer will sound. The names of the people who have indicated on the sign in sheet that they wish to speak will be called at random. I will call the name of the next speaker and the two that will follow so that they can come forward and sit in the reserved seats in the front row until their turn. We will now take testimony regarding MLA02-36 submitted by Michael Regan for re -designation of approximately 12,225 square feet of a parcel from Rural Residential 1:5 to a Rural Commercial land use district. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of this application. The Department of Community Development has recommended denial. The concern is that this hearing be fair in form and substance, as well as appearance. Do any of the Commissioners have an interest in this property or issue? 2. Do any of you stand to gain or lose any financial benefit as a result of the outcome of the hearing? 3. Can you hear and consider this in a fair and objective manner? 4. Has any member of the Board engaged in communication outside this hearing with opponents or proponents on the issue to be heard? ifso fhafi77OMh&rinvsfo/ace vafherecordihesvbslal7ce ofaly such c01771naVicalioasofhdofheiiale�esfed,Dari/esrnayhavefhe rryrhlloreballhesvbslance oflhe C017712 71// 5. Do you agree that the decision on each of these Comprehensive Plan Amendments will be based solely on the established record and that you will then compare that established record to the applicable criteria listed in the Comprehensive Plan? Page 2 of 5 Now, to the audience, does anyone object to the participation of any of the County Commis- sioners in this proceeding? If there are objections, please state the reasons. (The Commissioners presumably should remain silent and not rebut the inherently critical statements that might be made about one or more of them during this portion of the proceedings.) Before taking public testimony on this amendment, the Community Development Department staff, will present the staff report. Chair calls the first 3 names and keeps calling until through list. 6:15 p.m. or LATER — We will now take public testimony on MLA02- 232 submitted by J. Frank Schmidt & Son Company Profit Sharing Trust for the adoption of a "Forest Transition Overlay" district in the Comprehensive Plan and UDC to create a residential transition zone between Forest Lands and adjacent high-density pre -platted lots. The Planning Commission recommended adoption of the November 6 revised DCD recommendation. Before taking public testimony, the Community Development Department staff, will present the staff report. Chair calls the first 3 names and keeps calling until through list. Page 3 of 5 6:30 p.m. or LATER - We will now take public testimony on MLA02-239 submitted by Jefferson County to update Comprehensive Plan language in Chapter 2 (Implementation) based on recent GMA amendments related to statutory time lines and eliminate Plan references to outdated application deadlines. The Planning Commission recommended adoption of annual amendment time lines three months earlier in the annual cycle, beginning in 2004. Comprehensive Plan amendment applications would be due February 1 of each year. Before taking public testimony, the Community Development Department staff, will present the staff report. Chair calls the first 3 names and keeps calling until through list. 6.4.so.177 ol � 641FR- We will now take public testimony on MLA02-241submitted by Jefferson County to revisit the boundary established for the Glen Cove Industrial Area Light Industrial/Commercial Zone consistent with Comprehensive Plan Land Use Policy 1.4 and the GMA, and to adopt associated bulk and dimensional standards as development regulations. The Planning Commission has recommended a different boundary than that recommended by DCD. The Planning Commission has concurred with DCD's November 6 revised recommendation regarding bulk and dimensional standards. Before taking public testimony, the Community Development Department staff, will present the staff report. Chair calls the first 3 names and keeps calling until through list. Page 4 of 5 71S,oin. ol�64,0,f- We will now take public testimony on MLA02-242 submitted by Jefferson County to adopt an Urban Growth Area boundary in the Tri -Area and portray it on the land use map consistent with analysis conducted through the Special Study and the requirements of the Growth Management Act (GMA). Before taking public testimony, the Community Development Department staff, will present the staff report. Chair calls the first 3 names and keeps calling until through list. Chairman - Hearing no further comments, the hearings on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments is closed. No further oral or written testimony will be accepted. Thankeveiyonofo�col771; . Page 5 of 5 NOVEMBER 69 2002 PUBLIC HEARING: FIVE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS # APPLICATION GENERAL PLANNING FINAL STAFF NUMBER, DESCRIPTION OF COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION APPLICANT, PROPOSED RECOMMENDATION AND PARCELS AMENDMENT 1 MLA02-36 Comprehensive Plan On 10/16/02 the Planning Deny the amendment as Land Use Map re- Commission recommended proposed, consistent with designation for an approval (6-0 vote). Do the August 21, 2002 staff Michael Regan approximately 12,225 not accept the Department report. Do not re -designate square foot parcel from a of Community as Rural Commercial. Rural Residential 1:5 Development Assessor Parcel: Land Use District to a recommendation and 961808901 Rural Commercial Land findings and conclusions Use District related to the proposed amendment as contained in the August 21, 2002 staff report. Re -designate the subject parcel from Rural Residential to Rural Commercial General Crossroad. 2 MLA02-232 Proposing re -definition On 11/13/02 the Planning Approve the amendment, of the criteria for Forest Commission recommended consistent with the Land designation and/or approval (6-1 vote). Planning Commission J. Frank Schmidt & the adoption of a "Forest Accept the Department of recommendation, the Son Company Lands Buffer Overlay Community Development August 21, 2002 staff Profit Sharing District" to create a recommendation and report and the November 6, Trust residential transition findings and conclusions 2002 revised zone between Forest related to the proposed recommendation. Establish Lands and adjacent high amendment as contained in "Forest Transition Overlay" density pre -platted lots the August 21, 2002 staff designation. report and revised through their November 6, 2002 recommendation. 3 MLA02-239 Update Comprehensive On 10/30/02 the Planning Approve the amendment, Plan language in Chapter Commission recommended consistent with the 2 (Implementation) approval (6-0 vote). Planning Commission Jefferson County based on recent Growth Accept the Department of recommendation, the Management Act Community Development August 21, 2002 staff amendments related to recommendation and report and the November 6, statutory timelines and findings and conclusions 2002 revised eliminate Plan reference related to the proposed recommendation. Update to out -dated application amendment as contained in Comprehensive Plan deadlines. the August 21, 2002 staff Chapter 2 and UDC Section Comprehensive Plan report and revised through 9 to reflect February 1 amendment applications the November 6, 2002 staff deadline beginning in 2004. will be due February I of report. each year, beginning in 2004. JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-36-, Michael Re an DATE: FridaV, December 6 2002 at 6:00 p.m. PLACE: Jefferson County Superior Courtroom NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY Testimony? YES NO MAYBE 9 ❑ ❑ ❑ 1100 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 11110 ❑ 0 ❑ JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-232• Frank Schmidt & Son Co. DATE: FridaV, December 6 2002 at 6:15 p.m. or later PLACE: Jefferson Countv Sunerinr Cnurtrnnm NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY �� t G ►` lS (01 \ c, tr ( _<Oc Testimony? YES NO MAYBE YE L'-] ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-241; Jefferson County (Glen Cove) DATE: FridaV, December 6, 2002 at 6:45 p.m. or later PLACE: Jefferson County Superior Courtroom NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY Testimony? YES NO MAYBE I fn i I q /.I's n- Z 11 El El El D F El F-1 El El F El F El 11 El F] El [I F F1 F F El F ❑ F] El El F] El El El F F1 F El 11 F ��e74�- A Pt In• Z/C 0./C-/` e 6�-AQS2�-,T V. 0, 17T - JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-241 • Jefferson Count Glen Cove DATE: Friday, December 6 2002 at 6:45 p.m. or later PLACE: Jefferson County Superior Courtroom NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY Testimony? YES NO MAYBE j 13-7 s Potci" 4AP C✓'❑ ❑ ❑' ❑ ❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 621 Sheridan Street • Port Townsend • Washington 98368 360/379-4450 • 800/831-2678 • 360/379-4451 Fax www.co.aefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment Memorandum To: Jefferson County Board of Commissioners From: Staff CC: County Administrator Date: December 4, 2002 Re: Summary of November 26, 2002 City/County negotiations regarding Glen Cove and required UDC and Comprehensive Plan changes Attachments: Item 1: Glen Cove Issue Resolution Matrix Item 2: CP Chapter 3, page 3-28 line in/line out language Item 3: UDC Section 3.1(2)(c), page 3-2 line in/line out language Item 4: UDC Use Table 3-1, page 3-53 line in/line out language Item 5: UDC Bulk and Dimensional Table 6-1, page 6-3 line in/line out language This memorandum is intended to summarize the issues resolved through the City/County negotiations that occurred on November 26, 2002 (see Item 1). In addition this memorandum identifies those issues that will require specific amendment to the Comprehensive Plan (CP) and Unified Development Code (UDC). Changes to the UDC and CP are indicated in the attachments in underline for new language and strikeout for language removed. Generally, the county will be creating a new light industrial district to be known as the "Glen Cove Light Industrial" district. This new district will comprise approximately 51 acres (excluding roads, right of ways, and utility easements) and will have the following characteristics requiring modification to the CP and UDC: • 35' height limit with ability to go to 50' through conditional use process (this will also apply in the existing Light Industrial/Commercial district) 0 55% impervious surface coverage (this will also apply in the existing Light Industrial/Commercial district) • For Light Industrial district - building footprint limit of 10,000 square feet with the ability to exceed up to maximum of 20,000 square feet through a conditional use process • For Light Industrial/Commercial district — building footprint limit of 20,000 square feet with the ability to exceed up to a maximum of 40,000 square feet through a conditional use process with total floor space not to exceed 80,000 square feet • 40' buffer with 20' foot setback along State Route 20 from Old Fort Townsend Road north to the city limits The districts created as a result of these negotiations will be considered final and all reference to "interim" designations related to the existing Glen Cove LI/C will be removed from the CP and UDC. The following sections of the UDC and CP will need to be revised: • CP Chapter 3, page 3-28. Narrative describing Glen Cove Industrial Area (see Item 2). • UDC Section 3.1(2)(c), page 3-2. Description of Land Use Districts (see Item 3). • UDC Use Table 3-1, page 3-53. Insertion of new "Glen Cove Light Industrial' district in table with specific prohibition of mini -storage and wrecking yards (see Item 4). • UDC Bulk and Dimensional Table 6-1, page 6-3. Insertion of new "Glen Cove Light Industrial' district in table with bulk and dimensional standards reflecting the negotiated outcomes discussed above (see Item 5). [END] Item 1 I cl ^ o ��:) 1-4 O DO U ^Z W � � o 0 0 � 'o a � w o � o � 1 3 � o •� 4-6 Un ,� � ,� un w ^ U C:) o 0 3 bA 3 V � '� N cn O � CIO C/)O � cn y v, v, O sem+ O �, O U O OIn ^ M 4 >~ C) 0 — o M u I-, o 00 O14. o b o o °' w •� va O Q bUA 'd O U N Ur—L° o M U a v a y >~ Z o o•° r- o to o a o N ct j b o o O o 73 w I U V -d U) o o o o u o o �° C,3 E U U b 7a �D o>C:) ,r U C) 4- U a Es 0 w w O a 3 tL N p a -" o O w cOC a✓� ° U W c`nn�o � U��(� 00 CN C) N— I Item 2 Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. Page 3-28. Glen Cove Industrial Area Uses for the Light Industrial/Commercial (LC) designation at Glen Cove include commercial and retail uses that are directly associated with the light industrial uses. Associated commercial and retail uses may include commodities and products, mechanical or electrical supplies, warehousing and storage, or may provide support services to those who work in the industries, such as a small caf6. Allowing broader commercial uses at Glen Cove would require addressing concerns regarding pedestrian and traffic safety, infrastructure, and incompatible uses both visually and in terms of hazardous materials storage. Thus the commercial designation for Glen Cove is restricted to uses which differ considerably from those in Rural Crossroads and Rural Village Centers. Light industrial/commercial uses allowed at Glen Cove include but are not limited to: industrial parks, light manufacturing, construction yards, engine repair, metal fabrication or machining, plumbing shops and yards, printing and binding facilities (non -retail), research laboratories, excavating contractors, furniture manufacturing, software development, lumber yards, vehicle repair and restoration, warehousing and storage, boat building and repair, craft goods, blacksmith or forge, commercial relay and transfer stations, boat storage, and associated commercial uses as discussed above. Also permitted as conditional uses are those such as: amateur radio towers greater than 65 feet in height, caf6, car wash, electronic goods repair, fitness center, kennels, ministorage, and nursery/landscape materials. The Glen Cove inTer-iia;—industrial boundary for light industrial/commercial uses recognizes a contained cluster of existing uses, and is an interim industrial designation and boundary that will be revisited on completion of the Tri-Area/Glen Cove Study. The inter -boundary for this Plan reduces the zone from 295.9 acres to 68.96 acres to contain existing uses. The study will evaluate issues for Glen Cove related to infrastructure needs, countywide projected needs for industrial and commercial land, the potential for a Final Urban Growth Area, and will present options for uses that may be allowed as well as options for designation. During the planning process, the County held discussions with the City of Port Townsend regarding the designation of interim boundaries at Glen Cove, the Port Townsend Paper Mill, and all commercial areas, to determine that interim designations are consistent with Countywide Planning Policies. The City may have an interest in annexing the Glen Cove area to the Port Townsend Urban Growth Area, an issue that will be addressed following completion of the Special Study. In 2002 based on the December 2001 completion of the Tri-Area/Glen Cove Study, Jefferson County utilized the `limited area of more intensive rural development" (LAMIRD) provisions of the Growth Management Act [see RCW 36 70A 070(5)1 to revisit the Glen Cove interim light industrial/commercial boundary. Based on Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board clarification related to the,applicability of the LAMIRD provisions and through a negotiated process with the City of Port Townsend Jefferson County identified and designated a distinct Glen Cove Licht Industrial district (comprising approximately 51 net acres) in addition to the existing Glen Cove Light Industrial/Commercial district. [END] Item 3 Unified Development Code. Section 3.1(2)(c)(1). Page 3-2. a. Rural Industrial. (1) Light Industrial/Manufacturing (LIILD. The purpose of this district is to provide for rural economic development by regulating light industrial and manufacturing uses in the QuilGene area. The light industrial uses and activities associated with this district are intended to be compatible with the rural character ^f r'o,-tee ;e. There are two light industrial/manufacturing districts in Jefferson County: Quilcene and Eastview. (2) Glen Cove Light Industrial/Commercial (LI/C). The intent of this district is to facilitate economic development and provide for a broader range of light industrial and associated commercial activities in the Glen Cove area until the Potential Final Urban Growth Area (PFUGA) designation process for the Glen Cove area may be considered. Associated commercial activities are intended to directly serve the needs of the land use activities existing within this district. (3) Glen Cove Light Industrial (LI). The purpose of this district is to facilitate economic development and provide for a broad range of light industrial uses. The light industrial uses and activities associated with this district are intended to be compatible with the Glen Cove area. (4) Heavy Industrial (HI). The intent of this district is to facilitate economic development and regulate development of more intensive heavy industrial and manufacturing activities, including and associated with the Port Townsend Paper Mill. (5) Resource Based Industrial (RBI). This district recognizes existing forest resource-based industries in Jefferson County, in particular active sawmills and related activities. The district is intended to facilitate the continued operation of existing functional sawmills and related resource-based industrial activities in the County. There are three (3) Resource Based Industrial site designations in Jefferson County: Gardner, Center Valley, and the West End. Item 4 nnaln4se3 pue aueollnp =u!an� oeJnueW/le!ajsnpu!I 14611 J > J --o anoC) uai� _ U ILIjlsnpul #g 11 rC 0 z� 0 zl 0 0 (an03 ua1J) E = U x leloa9wwo3/jopjsnpul iv z CL Cl) m o — leiiisnpul 0 0 pose8-oomos98 z z ' U o peoissojo leaaua!D z U N Q peoissao Jolls!A m c dico/poogaog46laN z T peoissoao aoualuanuoC) z z 5. .Nod c.n-a oJa;uaO co a6e11!A leans > } z M o co osain U c OZ / na L ". z z co > '— c — co saaob OL / na L ar ;-' o . 0 0 _0 Lf) C; cn co M sant' 9 / na l z z rn o C-sCL T ' 6u!plogul19leans LL""' s `leloaawwoo—;saaod 0 0 MC3)cu ... 1e301IeloJaww03 t3 w — aanjlnopBv ` ' 0 z 0 z a Q aa) o CD o N 75 a)0 L �L > N U � C Cl) CZ Vi - "° 4)-D ti ++ N U- ) x 'R co a) ��.� moi, y � o 0 0 C CES to to Qr Item 5 uawdo an eu sn u ao(e # I t.. } P[ W Z M Cl M o LO CD U') C. LOQ o m a a m ¢ Z N U o a Q _aa r z � (pan�asa�j a eaiv tilmuo uegjn feu d uolleajoaa sanaasaad `sAJed a Z z N M CO LO N M Z z a) cn nnalnlse3 pue auaollnp � Q o O Ln � o m U n o o CD m o 5 z0 >: Lri CO ulan}� oelnue �Buisnpul146!'1 z o'= N Cl) co co r C � zCL CC U) a C—:, M o m LU U) anon U$IJ) z J Z V, W N M M 3 lel�lsnpul 14611 z Cvj w «CtY1lA�ppDD _ O a co LO Z� C1 _ ZD F- O L, __j n io �. c1 (aAOO UaIJ) = Q N in 1elojewwoonelalsnpul 146i1 - z Co0 COn, M �- N C b LU co le1alsnpul paseg-aoanosaa Fc N M M M CO O O a p ao < d Q zQ wM �� `� a Zcn O o aU) peoJssa3 leaaua� 0 z �w 0} C:) M M LOM Z QCi CD Lr) z o m w o cc peassoa JOIMA N M M M cc M z O Ln C. _ E /poo4�o4461aN Z Z z~ O LO COO O /p Q U) c7 w ¢ pewssaO aoualuanuo� a c o N M M LO LO coO ¢ Z 00 V — w U) = w Ln o N cc w Q ~ o Jalua3 a6e111A leans z= o N M co M a M � Z o CC a , N N C r _ � = co 2 N U�l Usaaod OZ / no 1¢ r r w >- Ln co N Z z CL w F- 2 :3Um LL Q W _ Ci •y.. sajod o L/no L O O O co F- Q O O Lf) O W Ln LC') Q F- Q C) w >. d... r T N co M ZD LO M N z W N Q. in z z 0 U a O O = w 0 Lli LU Oan ; 2: Saaad 5I /no r rLL 2 g N M M Lr M N z Q w LO o 4.0 coo ¢ F- IsaaOd 6uIPlo4ul LL o M M LC7 z 'a R LU m fr LU = O CO F- J F- J Z (� d F- T _--i H N LO C`n, w Q w • _ E 2=)Q LL F- Z W lsaaod Tema u N CD M CD M o Q D co O w O U a O Q Q g F- N� '- N Z LU O v;C\j U) O ¢ w u) ac �O F- tY F- p f iL1 1$aaod 1elo�awwo� LL- 22 O LL N M u7 M o T LL Ow C`13 L� Z a �- y z p Z d ieool - aJnllnola6tl aLnr N M ani Ln M O Z LL s O Q CC H � L� f UCIO Z W Z m U 1elojawwo3 - amllnola6V a N N o C)0 1-- Is Ln cot o z U, acu a to m C- - IDf0 N U ¢ =o U O E (U C/, 0 O C t;:; N o CU > N Cn _R N m a E O �j m _ [O O W o U YO U ;5 U CO w u) p cn L N CU O O O O N +-. CU O ---� N N CU A< :: Q J cu C 'D CD S C1 > E m Q. O Q. O O U O U .� Q ca N 2 CO U m E 73 Q O J LL O (U O O U a .0 O m '6 O U Cd(D O E� 'X »- W E d Ca 07 CS E E m ¢ co Er M Q cin Q � E C O N `2 �U) ��� G a E @ k/k k CO{ %/ CZ 0 c @2 � 2= �f / » _m f /0§ \\2 �= 2 � a2 CO k \ C-) E 2 S � »t kms/ 0 0 ) \®2 2fcz /a)cz 0 t\I k/k aCD C.0 //0 /gL U) /\3 2Ic f 3 / /§f 77% 07£ / E o/f _j 22E ma k$ \�> CD / ) _ ® k �/ /SCD /// // \ƒ Iten, 1 This map is for planning purposes only and does not represent a boundary that has been adopted by Jefferson County for purposes of land use regulations or zoning. Proposed Glen Cove Boundary Revision ... Existing Glen Cove LI/C Zone Tfl Proposed Light Industrial Zane 400 0 400 800 Feet Map Date: October 23.2002; Jefferson County Central Services - j:Y7%avpt®lenoove.apr T EXHIBIT C OVER This map is for planning purposes only and does not represent a boundary that has been adopted by Jefferson County for purposes of land use regulations or zoning. Item 2 113 MR Nola IF Iloilo 1..111 lnal =MI I!llllm walRlimplim .!a an no silo Im 2000 0 2000 4000 Feet ---- — ----- EXHIBIT E i i; if -1 F OVER " '! "fl, HARBOR 13I3VEI OPMENT SERVIC:;I S, LLC -------------------------------------------------------- PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES December 6, 2002 Board of County Commissioners Jefferson County PO Box 1220 Port Townsend, WA 98368 RE: Testimony, Public Hearing Glen Cove LAMRID/Comprehensive Plan Amendments, on behalf of the Barber and Evans Families Dear Commissioners, Please include the following comments in the public record as input to the hearing scheduled for Dec. 6, 2002, reference # MLA 02-241 (Glen Cove) and #MLA 02-242 (Tri Area UGA) comprehensive plan amendments. Attachments are listed below. The commissioners are urged to vote no on the proposed expansion of the GLEN COVE LAMIRD and direct the staff to finalize the GLEN COVE UGA. To adopt a LAMRID and reject a UGA because it is economically expedient and because the City of Port Townsend will not enter into an agreement to extend sewers to the Glen Cove Area (when excess capacity exists) is contrary to the Growth Management Act (GMA) for the following reasons: 1. The Glen Cove industrial area is characterized by urban growth. 2. Proximity of the Glen Cove industrial area (including the Port Townsend Paper Mill) to the Port Townsend UGA 3. Jefferson County has not allocated sufficient land to meet the forecast growth for commercial and industrial land. 4. The proposed LAMRID is not consistent with county wide planning policy or the GMA ThTE GLEN COVE INDUSTRIAL AREA IS CHARACTERIZED BY URBAN GROWTH. GMA states: "Urban growth refers to growth that makes intensive use of land for the location of buildings, structures, and impermeable surfaces to such a degree as to be incompatible with the primary use of land for the production of food, other agricultural products or 80.55 45TH AVE NE - SEATTLE, WA - 98115 PHONE: 206-522-6407 - FAX: 206-524.-4303 EMAIL I{DSLI,C@)yahoo.corn -2— December 6, 2002 fiber, or the extraction of mineral resources, rural uses, rural development, and natural resources land designated pursuant to RCW 36.70A.170. A pattern of more intensive rural development as provided for in RCW 36.70A. 070 (S)(d), is not urban growth. When allowed to spread over wide areas, urban growth typically requires urban governmental services. "Characterized by urban growth" refers to land having urban growth located on it, or land located in relationship to an area with urban growth on it as to be appropriate for urban growth ". THE LAND SPEAKS FOR ITSELF. The definition cited above if a perfect match for the Glen Cove industrial area. Because it may be more economical to designate a portion of the Glen Cove industrial area a LAMRID or because an inter -local agreement has not been worked out to provide sewer service (although it's available) does not change the character of the Glen Cove industrial area. Every public policy for the last twenty years has directed urban growth to the Glen Cove industrial area. The Glen Cove industrial area has: 1. A public water system that is owned and operated by the City of Port Townsend and the entire Glen Cove industrial area is within the Water Service Area. 2. A road network that was platted and constructed to serve urban development. 3. The largest employer in Jefferson County; the Port Townsend Paper Mill with approximately 313 employees. 4. Thirty one (3 1) percent of the total employment of the top 26 private employers in Jefferson County. 5. Fifty plus businesses that are economically linked to the Port Townsend UGA. 6. A direct highway link (SR 20) to the Port Townsend UGA where a majority of the Glen Cove employees live and travel to and from work. i. Public transit service. 8. Public police and fire service. 9. Industrial fire flow. 10. Electrical service from PSE including industrial three phase power. 11. Urban trail system connected to the Port Townsend UGA. 12. The only industrial area in the county that allows the type businesses located in the Glen Cove industrial area. THE GLEN COVE INDUSTRIAL AREA IS DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE PORT TOWNSEND UGA. 1. The northern boundary of the Glen Cove industrial area shares a common boundary with the Port Townsend UGA and the southern boundary lies southward from the Port Townsend UGA approximately 1.5 miles. 2. The portion of the Port Townsend UGA that shares a common boundary with the Glen Cove industrial area is zoned commercial and industrial and all urban services are available. -3— December 6, 2002 3. The northwest portion of the Glen Cove industrial area (outside the proposed LAMRID) is zoned INTERIM HF.AVYINDUSTRIAL. This zone contains a large private sewage disposal system. 4. Sewer and water service is adjacent to the northern boundary and the Glen Cove. industrial area. No inter -local agreements have been entered into to expand the water service or to provide sewer service to the Glen Cove industrial area. 5. City of Port Townsend currently serves 120+ commercial and residential water connections in the Glen Cove industrial area. 6. A Glen Cove UGA could accommodate the forecast demand for commercial and industrial land over the next twenty years. JEFFERSON COUNTY HAS NOT ALLOCATED SUFFICIENT LAND TO MEET THE FORCASTED DEMAND FOR COMMERICAL AND INDUSTRIAL LAND. 1. Jefferson County has forecast an increase in new jobs over the next twenty years to be between 4100 and 5300 new jobs with the majority of jobs forecast to be in the commercial sector. 2. Jefferson County has forecast that an additional 260+ acres of land will be needed over the next twenty years to accommodate the forecast increase in employment. Jefferson County needs to designate an additional 44 acres of industrial land and 216 acres of commercial land. While the county proposes to designate additional manufacturing land in the proposed Glen Cove LAMRID, it has not designated sufficient commercial land to meet the forecast increase in commercial employment. 3. Port Townsend UGA has not made land available to accommodate the forecast demand for commercial and industrial land. 4. The proposed LAMRID precludes commercial development other than accessory commercial uses or small scale retail uses. 5. The city of Port Townsend removed from their development regulations any possibility of having regional commercial development within the Port Townsend UGA. 6. Jefferson County has not made provision in their development codes for regional commercial development. 7. Retail leakage in Jefferson County is estimated to be $76,000,000+ annually and climbing. Citizens of Jefferson County are forced to drive long distances ( up to 35 miles) to purchase comparison retail goods. 8. Jefferson County has not designated or zoned land for additional commercial or industrial development since 1998. A GLEN COVE UGA IS CONSISTENT WITH COUNTY WIDE PLANNING POLICY AND GMA. 1. Circumstances have not changed that would preclude the Glen Cove industrial (including the Port Townsend Paper Mill) from becoming a UGA. -4— December 6, 2002 2. Assumptions contained in the current Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Special Studies are still valid. 3. Designating the Glen Cove industrial area as a LAMRID does not reflect currently held values. Public testimony should be considered and the designation of Glen Cove industrial area should not be based solely on an agreement between public officials. 4. The proposed Glen Cove LAMRID materially affects the land use and population growth projections and capital facilities studies recognized by Jefferson County. 5. The proposed Glen Cove LAMRID is not consistent with current county wide planning policy or the GMA 6. The Glen Cove industrial area is suitable as a UGA. Urban capital facilities and services are available to the area. In addition to the comments listed above, several comments are listed below that relate to the Glen Cove industrial area. Comprehensive Plan Changes — reference 4 MLA02-242 (Tri Area), page 3-28 Port Townsend Paper Mill. The current comprehensive plan designates the land the Port Townsend Paper Mill occupies as "Interim Heavy Industrial Zone". The proposed language change on page 3-28 would remove the word interim and create a Heavy Industrial Zone outside the Port Townsend UGA and outside the proposed Glen Cove LAMRID. THIS ACTION WOULD CREATE A SPOT ZONE. The same case can be made the proposed rezone MLA02-76, Eastview Industrial plat. Spot zones are not allowed under the GMA. Both areas should be included in a Glen Cove UGA. In addition the current comprehensive plan lacks adopted standards to expand the LAMRID in the Glen Cove Area. In closing, the Glen Cove industrial area is a major economic component of Jefferson County economic base. To assume this is a small rural area that exists to serve the rural hinterland is not based in fact. Every study that has been completed by Jefferson County has concluded the Glen Cove industrial area is characterized by urban growth. If it looks urban and feels urban then it must be urban. It is too late to attempt to redefine an area to rural from urban. I request the Board of County Commissioners reject the proposed Glen Cove LAMRID expansion and direct staff to finish the work necessary to create a Glen Cove UGA. THE LAND SPEAKS FOR ITSELF. ATTACHMENTS 1. Parcel Map showing the proposed Glen Cove LAMRID, Glen Cove Provisional UGA, Port Townsend zoning, and the proposed zoning for the Port Townsend Paper Mill. 2. Port Townsend Paper Mill, Interim Heavy Industrial Zone, (HI). 3. City of Port Townsend zoning by parcel, south end of Port Townsend UGA 4. Glen Cove zoning by parcel, north end of Glen Cove industrial area. — i — December 6, 2002 5. South end of the Glen Cove industrial area zoning and location and name of businesses. 6. Glen Cove industrial area property owners. 7. Economic Development Council a. Industrial Sites b. Commerce and Finance c. Frequently asked questions d. Major employers 8. Glen Cove Street system 9. Glen Cove Water service area 10. Article from the "Leader" dated 11-6-02, City Council strikes regional commercial zone from Comp. Plan qr ely, D. Lindsay CC: Barber/Evans families Rich Hill, attorney rammir.jamm..16W. -:{{ rye: X360) 385-2000 .- ... am ,. ... 1/4 12 - -W - 1* 0! .0 JACOB fAfLLkK ma AVEW& e ee��� ev TAX 42 (LOS TAX 63) 4 �yi UJWY Swu T:� 63) T�!S 24 st MAL am"20". TAX 411 TAX 49) !i f IlTA 4 2jw C Ism 4. l. / """- I a"PO t i 1 110,11110111 7 To W'5e m 4,4 L 1714 i. 3A0 Q� v ..I :)hone: (360) 385-2000 FA d SN Sl T LO T1 C Gl,,r,j Cov _P4 GA/ ARe A ej V, PORT TOWNSEND PAPER MILT. INTERIM HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ZONE (HI) LEGEND: 1 Port Townsend Paper Mill SCALE: V = 7OW mug*. IM r' r� r a f rr�r ■c� ■ri[■■ ��N ♦rrar . AdAA dill 111 1 04 ANNA Ales AAF�A ' 1911 10,111G, lifer iii+ @� I: IN HVI iitj IiilIM �iEii�'Ii3��i'I � k1h ME '194 NOR 110�9 Temp AAEIA AAAA R�� ° 8116 i� utT , II :iiIICH :0aFb YErigE. j arti.E...: LEGEND: 1 Port Townsend Paper Mill SCALE: V = 7OW mug*. IM Map Output 000000 50 450700706 950700704 CAD109M4 0MOONS 001OW17 On*J w aj 0011621001 A pmvWed by Jdfenwa COUAY GIS -d 001iM17 V N 2-o Y"#I= 001161002 001 0M page i or i �!j t Rjad pa!;,.Ws Pz)n Town F-1 )RIVIATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY- warranty with respea County does not aftest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes no 5s or validity. Data contained in this map is limited by the method and accuracy of its collection. information is based on the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Map and does not include changes made during th z,hensive Plan amendment process. Zoning designations must be confirmed with the Department of Comm httt):Ilmat)s.co.iefferson-wa.uslservleticom.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=parcels-ou... 12/4/2002 Map Output T Arc1M5 HTML. Viewer Ma p fzc Page 1 of 3 httn://mans.co.iefferson.wa.us/serviet/com.esti.esrimae.Esrim,ap?ServiceName=parcels_ou... 12/4/2002 302Q O010mlo MOO= QOi0�9008' OOM' G' Oot(�.SO1i 00100OW 000coom U410MA WIDOWW 00IC04 * 04if, Q1T =c"to victftl 14.,(aQ1 44ei ea. s �y" 33oiCfJ1 g y }tp2 9633Ot5Ot 001162b13 4i$W(A 401 Iml 16MI7 9ft3301S(t1 $134300441 001162D14 001161002 w Otk'10t'ea2.'A".+ _ 9b3'iili30t C000002,50 ti 43G33i1138f 001162 Si1'iii 96""�iJi/1f1{ 4 P- rf� 001 161004 v 9�S3Ut601 ooil " of 0014620ig a6880120H OOYJ002:20 001161002 96�3017b1 963soOCD1 J ^' OObbDOM ON 161002 ,� wmr s- 1800 9633 io i 00116=11 0011C�dGiE rn 011$10{32 9633018[1, [.i *33404M :t ooi t6?.�6(Y2 A•96330i101 {t. 000K7GY}L'j0 OOSi62015 u01162= 5 utr. �� 001162007 0011620X4 001162A03 001t6`1�001161Odt3 00116100A- 0000O025Q � 0011G201O OOOONM1 Wa Napa provided byJdknwn CanntyGIS,A L1 Page 1 of 3 httn://mans.co.iefferson.wa.us/serviet/com.esti.esrimae.Esrim,ap?ServiceName=parcels_ou... 12/4/2002 Map Output Page 2 of 3 http://Maps.co.iefferson.wa.uslservieticom.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=parcels—ou... 12/4/2002 GLEN COVE INDUSTRIAL AREA INTERIM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL f COMMERCIAL ZONE {L/C} oil 4� ����� : �immill 11 MAINE� I. 10 �: , PIN i4 2 1 SWRT PLAT S Lm R/W Nw NE 17.31 a 12 _ &.0 a 41.42 a. urr s 7 $ 17 "' ` 18 16 001212000 .... OM211002 TAX 17 Nw NE &.0 a 41.42 a. 11 1 g+ 1 8 32 2 1 D 6 DDt2120f3 TAX 10 5.12 a. SETON I' ftw Dili 21 22 23 S1/2 1W NW LESS TAX 1 a , 13 27 4 15 16 6.10 a aS ii 061212017 'SWNttl(tf0.26AC) 11� OF 5t 14 TAX5=HwY 20 SCDJ H • ►`lf � srsl 0.+0 001212022 AJILECLIAN 001112007 TAX 26 TAX 2 3 82 a Mos a 28 TAX n ».n OOI2120Wt swa"Kw OFST Fiver 21*3 N 0.25' A. tS SYDU dF N1W YS.87 a r��Ih�?NSS�'a f6 OIMm6 bIC. +6 AIL LING ItR �QL�p �O 16 Maw Y1�DOL 0! 8b 11E ' f�iM!!a �fDi6' 30 22M CISA lIIAT INDAILt6 Di emm DOOM mw i3wromom�p�p1 >!O1IRZORR 7'40fO�PD ImR 8f01A8i iT MMS' ATllb f1LCIZ Q1leC aR 80A7 11A11DBOVW 4 >� 0lODACR Le PORI TOw110 m 9Aa'0D6Uom Is w m 0 liubbs e r° 4au° a s ca �bv a s 0 So 1 > bofelbDfaer slaatbo ArrASAlar: 61C nP21112 OIL 00. a6 Xnam , woobwam aTm1e fq F00117A0t 'l CR11118t as DAWN VAP-si'08iM b oLT1OIlC amlL C6L1wR D D i b it If as =moo" d'hlil4 fiCRJ m (4 mm" l0 A ll R C0. a7 TMCRAFT DAOW W11102leWlw 1 MINKS S'CA�S., ii wfeafxs AND CIONS 6TLTDd11C ILAIWlAL76P18!! Ai ADSO-DRAT bICOAO4 _ Y` 4w14 amm Slow= lRF7l�! lfC. O iWQamR }a0111R aa! AL MU d 8't+ CD tJ4 - aQ0 tl ttDNC7�tt�c+De-C7rOOtAtDtOCV rtflOaptLl:f d OLIDtA1+ rNNr ^� ;ra"oc°o"Oi(6)WtM('Fl688I cz Vern aia�i�c`va~a`Wc�r.oaGI'0'0 1�tooNuoro o°sao�roba5or�oa5aorLa&ObUSa, r=abac►�apbu�c�ooao ' ooao% bboodsaoab N ROOMaptfll�rt�mOmtflN[QadC{��fltri�McMc�r3 MlMMC�3MCCDMM Ca M C7LOrV-COCl) C CM C4 (D t7 CO pp�p� 00 0)(D00srn00)0)00)00)00)00 0)00)MMDM0)0)00 OO400 DiM00Dt�00D00)00rn00�ODi00rnCf�00DMd0i00i0M 0.- �aW zS'S'S03:3:3:3:3:3:3:3:3: S'S tics°�ccEcccccc�c�ccc�?ccc�cccccc ow cmm mmt°==asaDmQaaa� mcvma�wasacummmSSISSOU) c c c O v' c a'o c r -o c c= c nc c c c c c c `�' c c c c c c En o o� I o=� �0 0 0 0= o 0 0 otn= o 9900000000 'ut-r rr N vrr rrmr rrr arrrrrrrrrt—�-- 0 0 0 0 r o 0 0 0 0 000 LI- o o 000 o o o o o o as a. d- •a n. to cLo. a a- a. cicLcLma.cLn.acLa.n. CO Ca N n Z ao Q M 0 �" c W c m x car. r. o 0 Z� Q Oflcp NaQ as r-6 m s 10 u> H- 2 2 tx 0 Q �� r LKd m "'� Nxg 0' N r ,., 0 N 0) CO `Ca o o CO c C%j (n m r C 0o Z CL r cc tQA r W N O "D r et to ��� c o�� mZr mp amid oo)i�po MCD CW c QAC ��p�p n-aNt1?t0 .d r c 9 .O ao Un E c I N *6 `D j as L c ti) N rM > V- m m} -FO E x "act/) c c� oF- mr• m c c m x._ W �UJ0 d o >`� as cc'32otnc�LN.-casa OW r lz oa }Z a U� c c mem =�inN��xmF-a m >~ ak�m o asm� c� v me Do �U�saim,. �'c 20 3: a 0©m-wu a�N o' -' maY m 0 M 0 c m-J.0m.-c0) ILr0) CL a p in a>c aO'E c > U0�-a,n°C1-i ��ih---- L N _ L mM �=�W� W C mci0 45 a u -N ca=o 0i = rs c r. E� �ciNN �o� (>D�`` .� CL m r-� g w cc U m W t) a 0 v, c Qf U -`'' Lm = >. m � �+ ti CL C c m to. c�� to -i aV ar cco 3 y,�nc 3- > c �-�.0 v-0 T � nmi ELL "� c c o.. Q JU L >x�c m EW m oac N m cco o m e o c._ criC7 0 -a u1. =0.- 2 w c8 o�m•c�L ra-mn0D a $ c.J�r mYWr= m mJ•a��- a c�irZ 7,c� c oW' m U �ah- - N oc'c is did m �, a©0tl 0 = 0tmDfl- `� - W.C� �c ovau"cda2,,,aozcYi?°�Z Quo=��0cp N �oVLi j U. Q -u- w ai U � i5 o��mo r m ccs c m oti '7 -C7 - c N C W •c W c *a C) CL Cr. L� W d. 0-0 aci m c� � � m � 4 � ~ J � a0 Z U_ m Z Z m Mtt)rMCD4�tAt17 MdlOt1OOMQf01`� Nt3tpNrstrI- ww MrMNNrrrCN eAOO�t?MMtifepp-1��fqq)t�fqq)•©CSitnM V-pMp (0 to tytpmul82G94coo Mr OM~C,1881dr'NC�OtI'A�N�aOCD 'ncoC?C 0 2G 94 OOta4a0 . e t +� e O t 4)4) u4cs��lt-, mc5c3cbWODcotoODOb0000w0OOCOAth(b600 Co Nr OCD O�Cc�MMt�MMM�MQa V),ncoMCP co 00 co ci0mt mm mCD0fm00mmmmmm0i4m4)ImMrc� _ 4) N O C C C7 N O C C C C C C C C C C C C t7 C C C N O tU N G to d� V N W Q� 0) N cff U) tC 0� O O y t4 tl� �1 0 3 rn rn og o to v� cn r- rn u� cn m 3 C C 10 G G C G c G— C G^ C COtp G c cn co ca 3 33 333a�33�.3=3t� 3 c a 3: a-0 v; o o o� a o o o o o wo otn o 0 0 0 0 Jh-F0 oCaF-i-UFFFFFh vF-F hh FFh 00 U 00 000000000 0� 0 000 a a. a_ ci a. cL rL a. a. CL c a a. a a d a. 0- m 1-wh h Z hao 4m %- C14 h F Q (0 CO) Vi fn J LnM_ 'ttn ll y O V O O x O O o .O mca = 111 G N �O O Om o v Z N COMcoOU. Q. d- a. 'O Y r N `- CNI co to LL a r s. M N W 04 m tt) 00N r N O r 4) 2 cFIJrpM L Z.�tp 00ao0oapo r- C14 2 cntt) coir tt� Mm c (D G a� x ca >F 0-"C Lor to 3 xFi.. c _ x r' o o 0 o2Q ��OmY x o °-W o �,> ca u.F2.. m c° > o x y GO'Gmg -' ODy AN1Yim -�'M:g J Em= C>X� -imam s U E coO ID c cOpO-Umau`4. t°.;�`00 MOC) cu mo m m CM a %mom U'�JQ' ON G��-�',�.vr- °5 0- Cl) g{�� 20 c Fv)N� W �b in �� 9IV to (� _N � v r L to V J h r E r p ) O r co co U- J �' E N E cc Co 0 U V U. rN y G Q? N= •+ y t_ L G -' ', 1� �- a C 0 G N G Lr S y N C N 0 tD :C in y> N Q1 O C3 W G O G :1:. G% O to m tU CO} 'C t! C G C y y tll Cly tf -0 Z CO oi✓nJd �N 031- Y FOX aN�a OF -C o� CD' -- W o F.. -��{'!g Qm pp y J L w WRL :UJO-- to G °� o g p C 1 j C Ca Co O o � C7 y ttl G T w a_ N ^tGtS CO)G tD G L .+ L a iA o y G a �0 � aQ tah� aI'o rL o. au! yea. a¢c�� r o o) E oInn o? Gp-��, as (D 2 ", G a� o p0 sg o W cl., m 6 o�0`c �Yco a� iV V' icos is a Z � EDCJC Relocation & Investors Guide - Industrial Sites -Relocation ocati n ?d �� tY"V17Sak8tt�9fi?2' tF��b3�� t E>t 7«i�.3L II I 'lr Guide Industrial Sites There are over 500 acres of industrially designated land available in Jefferson County. Sites are located in all incorporated and unincorporated communities. A variety of development options are available including sale, lease, build to suit or other custom arrangements. In addition, certain forms of industrial development can take place on non -designated parcels on resource lands through conditional use permits. ......................................... - Port Industrial Areas The Port of Port Townsend maintains and operates three designated industrial development areas in Port Townsend, the Tri -Area and Quilcene. The Port, a publicly owned corporation, can utilize its tax authority to construct general- purpose buildings and infrastructure improvements for private sector development. t d,gG 1 U1 -1 1. Port Townsend Industrial Park / Port ToWAWnd Sh:1RY rd_ (Map: 2) The Port's Port Townsend industrial Park is located on Port Townsend Bay in Port Townsend. This 40 acre site is the home of the county's thriving marine trades industry and includes the Boat Haven commercial and recreational marina. The site is fully served by sewer and water and it is designated heavy marine industrial under the City of Port Townsend's Comprehensive Plan. Other infrastructure available on this site includes Port operated 330, 70 and 60 ton mobile straddle lifts, marine vessel wash -down facilities, commercial fueling and full fire suppression. 2. Jefferson County International Airport Industrial Park (Map: 5) Jefferson County International Airport is a newly reconstructed, 3,000 foot runway general utility class airport. Over 60 aircraft, predominately small private planes are based at the facility. One charter operation, Port Townsend Airways, provides charter service to Seattle -Tacoma International Airport and other regional locations. Airplane maintenance, fuel and restaurant services are available. About 150 acres designated for light manufacturing use under the Jefferson County. comprehensive plan are available for development. The site is served by the Port Townsend municipal water sy§Lem. Sewage disposal is through on site septic systems. The Port is in the process of completing a comprehensive development plan for the site that will specifically identify aviation and light manufacturing locations and sites for future hangers, retail and warehouse development. Sites designated for light manufacturing under local comprehensive plans are located throughout the county. Several of the most significant sites are listed below. httv://www,edcic.com/guide/indsites,httnl 12/3/2002 EDCJC Relocation & Investors Guide - Industrial Sites rage /- (m 3. uilcene Boat Haven The Part operates a small marina in Quilcene in southeastern The Port has over Jefferson County. 50 acres in associated uplands and waterfront. The major tenant is Coast Oyster Company, which operates a large shellfish hatchery and processing facility. Water is provided on site with limited infrastructure development. ................. I--............. Privately Owned Industrial Sites 1. Port Townsend Business Park (Map: 1) The Port Townsend Business Park is a fully permitted, 34 acre planned unit development located off SR 20 in Port Townsend. It is fully served by power, sewer and water. The developer is willing to sell developed sites or build to suit. The site is permitted for warehouse, office, light manufacturing, and retail uses. 2. Glen Cove Industrial Area (Map: 3) The Glen Cove Industrial area, located at the city limits of Port Townsend, encompasses a 70 acre area which is designated for light manufacturing use under the Jefferson County comprehensive plan. Multiple ownerships include both small and large tracts. Private owners are willing to sell, lease or build to suit. The site is served with water by the Public Utility District #1 of Jefferson County with a six inch main supplying water from the Port Townsend Olympic Grayhy Water System. Three phase power is available. Major arterial roads are paved. The comprehensive transportation system has been platted for future development. 3. Four Corners Industrial Area (Map: 4) The Four Corners Industrail Area is a 40 -acre parcel, formerly the location of a sawmill and shake yard, located approximately 5 miles south of Port Townsend on SR 20. 4. Pederson Mill (Map: 6) A privately owned 22 acre parcel located adjacent to Quilcene is designated for light manufacturing. The site was formerly the location of a sawmill and heavy equipment repair shop. On the site is a 6,000 square foot steel pole structure. Water and septic are both provided on site and three phase power is available. Frequently Asked uestions Housing Commerce and Finance Education El Population Economic Base Transportation & Communication Community Employment Income Indust1y Industrial Sites Taxation Enema and Utilities G mate Economic Development nirpr my htto://www.edeic.com/guide/indsites.htmi 1213/2402 EDCjC Relocation & Investors Guide - Industrial Sites Relocation & investors Guide Back to Economic Development coqn�cq of Jefferson County Economic Development Council of Jefferson County 734 Water Street, P. O. Box 877 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone: (360) 385-6767 FAX: (360) 385-6768 Email: edciefco@Olvmnus.net - -1.1 ...................... I -------- Copyright (01998 EDC of Jefferson County Web Development Wind's Eye Design, http://www.edcjc.com/guiderindsites.htnil 1213/2002 EDCJC Relocation & Investors Guide - Commerce and Finance :investor's ui ide {''.�>v�3�K:i':• sir re':Z c!k ff7racYdr . sJ.: Commerce and Finance Business in Jefferson County is small business. National studies have found that small business has been the engine of economic and job growth in comparison to large corporations. This fact is a major reason behind the robust performance of the local economy over the past decade. Over 250 businesses have been started in the county each of the last five years in all economic sectors. These new firms join the existing 2,300 businesses in the county. The majority of new starts are service and retail enterprises, mirroring national trends; however, many are manufacturing concerns. Retail sales have grown by 201/o during the last five years, fueled by new construction activity, a growth in local retail enterprises, population growth and tourism. The majority of these sales occurred in Port Townsend, the county seat. Page I or 3 Construction continues to increase, stimulated by brisk population growth during the late 1984s. Immigration continues at a steady rate. Each year since 1990, over $50 million in new construction has been added to the assessment rolls in Jefferson County. Most growth in residential and commercial activity is located in the unincorporated portions of the county, especially Port Ludlow. Three commercial banks, three savings and loans, and two credit unions are located in the county, operating a total of ten branches. Two of the banks have their home offices in Jefferson County while the rest belong to larger regional banks. Economic development financing tools such as the loan programs of the Small Business Administration are available to new and existing businesses in the county through local banks. In addition, several revolving loan pools can be accessed. The Economic Development Council works closely with state, federal and non-profit financing agencies to package loans for qualifying businesses. Commercial Centers Port Townsend is the largest and only incorporated community in the county. It is the http://www.edcjc.com/guide/commerce.html 12/3/2002 EDCJC, Relocation & Investors Guide - Commerce and Finance Pagel of s county seat and serves as the major commercial center. The 1997 population is estimated at 8,330 residents, one-third of the county population. There are two major industrial parks in the city limits: the Port of Port Townsend'$ Boat Haven Industrial Park and the Port Townsend Business Park. The Tri -Area, composed of the unincorporated communities of Port Hadlock, Irondale and Chimacum, is located approximately ten miles south of Port Townsend. The 1994 population of the region was 5,233. Port Hadlock is a regional commercial center with two branch banks, food stores, and personal and retail services. Port Ludlow, 25 miles south of Port Townsend is a planned community of 1,773 residents. It is one of the fastest growing areas of the county. Pope Resources, the community's developer, is continuing its major residential expansion as well as commercial development. It has a neighborhood commercial center with food services and personal services. Port Ludlow is also the location of the nationally recognized Port Ludlow Resort and Conference Center, which includes a 300 -slip manna, 27 holes of championship golf and conference facilities. Brinnon and Quilcene are small communities located in southeastern Jefferson County on Hood Canal with populations of 1,325 and 1,301 respectively. Both have neighborhood commercial services. The area is attracting increasing numbers of retired individuals seeking rural homes in a scenic area. The West End is the term applied to the vast region of Jefferson County located on the Pacific Coast and isolated from eastern Jefferson County by the Olympic Mountains. 963 people live in the area and there are several small communities including Clearwater and Oil City. The county Sheriff maintains a satellite office here. Allen Logging, one of the county's largest wood products industry employers, is located in this region. __... _............ ................................... ............................ ........................ ........ I.................. Retail Sales Retail sales have grown strongly over the past decade. Their growth has been heavily influenced by the growth in population and expansion of the tourism sector. While sales have increased dramatically, retail expenditures are far below that expected in a community of this size. It is estimated that up to seventy-one million dollars a year in retail sales leakage accrues to neighboring counties. This represents a large market opportunity for new local retail trade businesses. t FMuently Asked Population Employment Income Questions T HQusina Econorrdc Base Industry industrial Sites Transportation & Taxation Energy and Utilities Commerce and Finance Communicab n http://www.edcjc.com/guide/commerce.html 12/3/2002 EDCJC Relocation & investors Guide - Frequently Asked Questions +i0AW .in-vestor's Guide by :� t:a aX'kt• tia a�y€33 C t» ?D+i#r3L• :ri eiitnC4.�C wxi,E+�ibsty .:t1:� Frequently Asked Questions rage , vi Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index information for the Seattle/Tacoma Region is available through the San Francisco Regional Office of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. PROPERTY TAXES: (2001) Assessed valuation: $2,599,672,160 Total levy: $30,561,315 Average Rate: $10.72 TAXABLE RETAIL SALES: (2000) Total County: $274,309,061 Port Townsend: $136,101,245 Unincorporated: $138,207,816 POPULATION: (2000) Jefferson County: 25,953 Port Townsend: 8,334 Port Hadlock/Irondale: 3,476 Port Ludlow: 1,968 Brinnon: 803 Quilcene: 591 Other Unincorporated Area: 10,781 MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME: (2000) Jefferson County: $35,373 Washington State: $41,715 UNEMPLOYMENT RATES: (August, 2002) Jefferson County: 5.4% Washington State: 6.7% United States: 5.7% MAJOR INDUSTRIES: Pulp and Paper Marine Trades/Boatbuilding Wood Products/Logging Diversified Manufacturing Tourism Health Care Total Employer Firms: 1,145 Total Workers: 7,889 Overall Average Wage: $25,155 http://www.edcjc.com/guide/faq.html 12/3/2002 EDCJC Relocation & Investors Guide - Frequently Asked Questions All port Townsend Paper Corcoration � 313 Hadlock Building Suaniti S Post Office 34 Jefferson Count Chimacum School District #49 273 X17 U son Transit po eTownsend/Jeff. Counter Leader 34 34 Jefferson General HoPM 3i7 Port Ludlow Associates Townsend School District #50 181 173 t The Prinery Seton Construction 25 24 Port 135 Part of Port Townsend Safeway_ U S Naves Indian Island 132 Coast Seafoods Edensaw Woods 22 22 Olympic Correction Center Port Townsend 101 88 Little & Little Construction 22 C_ ihof The Food Co -o 80 75 Henery Hardware ote Found Candles 21 20 Coy.._, Quality Food Centers 2� 70 Galmukoff Marine 20 Kalaloch Ocean Lo_d_ge_ 60 Lakeside Industries 20 Allen Lo�tstin� Com nanv 59 Timbercraft Homes 20 Kah-Tai Care Center Townmend Bav Marine 50 Puget Sound Enerav 18' 16 Enclume Design P� 39 37 Jeff�Title New Dav Fisheries 15 Qui_lcene School District 37 Shine uarry 14 Thermionics Northwest Al, FMguentiv Asked emulation _Questions Housin Econorric Base ............................ feMloment Indust Income industrial Sites Transportation & Tutton Enerav and Utlitie _Commerceand Finance Communication Climate Economic Development Education Commu Directory Relocation & Investors Guide ------------- Back to EON Nkt C-Ou _i. of .. �aaones [ �vnty Home Pam `'...................................................---............................... Economic Development Council of Jefferson County 734 Water Street, P. O. Box 877 Port Townsend, WA 98368 Phone: (360) 385-6767 FAX: (360) 385-6768 Email: edciefco(a�olvmyusnet -- Copyright ©1999 EDC of Jefferson County httv://www.edcjc.com/guide/faq-htmi 12/3/2002 V ty'+N'In �.^.,f'.r.'1"..ty ^'r ..�.rv�h�. tif'q'7'*11 ,•.. ^yfV 1'•�,R i k k <+stc•ct .':Wl.�i;<tyWr,�<«'�WWW�:«W'C •G: Ly«trtWc�CWt � y Ci a• o. � n •<' � v'� a a r o � 4G; r n k� �ec$ckcce`3at,i5 d�wwwwc�cz �c eek � Vt^c7v�'�x��x�tiae e m2 •yN ��nn '� 2'x' S• mm Kin R�<%U4xU QTY.!MEET°w �? A it i Aw q 1 l U HAS, os - 1 p r A t� QLu a-' ��♦ INDI W C7 -- LU LU r C1 4X `•;t ;��7 �! r+ ,���,"''^^^'���•• 4 .fig �` F 4� �• X '".�4 -... /.� TAdfi 'V �, "^YtA♦�..+tceit: 'i •.., iv xw�i a., jrle rinursnn9 w H :Y Ct '7 Ca "?h�NN•�. �� R'4 .'i..^.�.1N''�.f�m MMS h'r�`�1'Y1�^:l�1f"M'^Yn�.`�, Ny`I "?�'�1 M1.�hi +; t...Nn1 +�. a!1 ax«ee<«+merici'��« •e<WcitecW<wee<tW•CCe<ee«-t<'eWe nzi i2! ` � ¢ ..: � '��`- �` C V• �� � � � y {' 7.S4 [1 per'. /'T'j Gid'^ � £ cc. ti y'Ci °C 3 a ra �. � .•. � s . ,� . a � j„`1+.1 i` C GS � � vJ � � ey w a, s .Cc .�' � attsc y;2xC �fi� vdp�ntiyv q�k? awes, w C-� °f4tC'`..^.c -'- tl 3 fiC cy 3w-c -a a �oA�, Q .c a _ : Q0.-• =0 8 C k'+ 3 - .vv q�M yi uj rii ty Grt r7y �hGn`�iFk'r r a?ZvQ4,0.0.Gt M Q;yvi•q �j N V ty'+N'In �.^.,f'.r.'1"..ty ^'r ..�.rv�h�. tif'q'7'*11 ,•.. ^yfV 1'•�,R i k k <+stc•ct .':Wl.�i;<tyWr,�<«'�WWW�:«W'C •G: Ly«trtWc�CWt � y Ci a• o. � n •<' � v'� a a r o � 4G; r n k� �ec$ckcce`3at,i5 d�wwwwc�cz �c eek � Vt^c7v�'�x��x�tiae e m2 •yN ��nn '� 2'x' S• mm Kin R�<%U4xU QTY.!MEET°w �? A it i Aw q 1 l U HAS, os - 1 p r A t� QLu a-' ��♦ INDI W C7 -- LU LU r C1 4X `•;t ;��7 �! r+ ,���,"''^^^'���•• 4 .fig �` F 4� �• X '".�4 -... /.� TAdfi 'V �, "^YtA♦�..+tceit: 'i •.., iv xw�i a., jrle rinursnn9 w za po 44 '. al 0 V '45 „.8 A00 3: % a g I � 0 4h ;00-4 -4m) Poo U 13 AV g40" M�$jgo� T A Cd u kd R 8 020 >45 IN d , I 1 are -t Ara p o > t.9 4) 00 — go o . 0 Z A.13 A 1 mia.-4 w-00- Q . 0-0 N 4) 0.0 0 Olt LAW OFFICES CRAIG L. JONES FRONTIER FINANCIAL CENTER SECOND FLOOR - SUITE 202 19950 SEVENTH AVENUE NE POULSBO, WASHINGTON 98370 PHONE: (360) 779-5082 FAX: (206) 292-0521 December 6, 2002 Board of County Commissioners Jefferson County Washington Jefferson County Courthouse Port Townsend, Washington 98368 Re: Proposed Glenn Cove LAMIRD Dear Commissioners: EMAIL: CJONES@OLYPEN.COM FA/ •f'��Ny The following is an outline of my presentation to the Commissioners on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Gene Seton on Friday, December 6, 2002: I. Introduction A. Representing Gene and Marilyn Seton, owners of property within the proposed Glen Cove Final. LAMIRD. B. Tonight's Comments — Three Issues: A. The Setons' property along the northern boundary of the LAMIRD should be included; B. The buffer requirements along SR -20 should not be increased from 30' to 40'; and C. The County should reconsider and eliminate the disparity in land uses and prohibited land uses within the Glenn Cove LAMIRD. Board of County Commissioners December 6, 2002 Page 2 of 4 II. THE SETONS' PROPERTY LOCATED IMMEDIATELY NORTH OF THE PROPOSED LAMIRD BOUNDARY SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE FINAL LAMIRD: A. The Setons have owned the property since 1983, since inception of the Glenn Cove industrial area; B. Until 1998, the property was designated industrial/commercial. It was included in the overall Glenn Cove industrial/commercial zoning. C. The property was initially included in the boundaries of the proposed Glenn Cove LAMIRD because of the prior zoning and 1990 "built environment". D. The property appears to have been excluded only as a result of the negotiations between the County and City with regard to the ultimate LAMIRD boundaries. E. There is no evidence in the record that warrants removal of the Setons' property from the LAMIRD. There is, however, significant evidence that warrants inclusion of the Setons property within the logical outer boundaries of the LAMIRD. F. The Planning Commission, voting 6-1, recommended inclusion of this property within the LAMIRD. It would be appropriate and fair to the Setons to include this property to avoid the hardships they face with property developed and anticipated for commercial use, but relegated to rural residential use. II1. THE COUNTY SHOULD NOT INCREASE THE BUFFER ALONG SR -20 FROM THE EXISTING 30' TO 40'. A. There is no evidence, nor any study, report or other factual basis for requiring an additional buffer along SR -20. B. The additional buffer was not proposed by the County Staff, but appears to have been added during the negotiations between the City and the County. Board of County Commissioners December 6, 2002 Page 3 of 4 C. The additional buffer will have an adverse and detrimental impact on the Setons, who own a significant amount of the property bordering SR -20 that will be adversely impacted by the additional buffers. While the staff has proposed a "variance" process for small lots, there is no need for the additional buffer, nor any reason that property owners should be required to resort to the additional administrative efforts associated with the discretionary attempt to obtain a variance. D. The equestrian trail associated with the Larry Scott Trail is currently located within the area that will comprise the buffer. This raises another issue that is not addressed clearly: "What can be done within the buffers? What can be done within the setbacks? These issues are not clearly addressed. E. Finally, the additional buffer requirement may constitute a takings without compensation or unlawful taxation under recent Washington Supreme Court case law. The Supreme Court has determined that governmental entities are prohibited from imposing open space and buffer requirements without ensuring that the imposition is actually necessary based upon the impacts of the development. In this case, there is no rationale for increasing the buffers. It merely results from the negotiated settlement between the City and the County and should be carefully considered in light of the recent Supreme Court case. IV. THE PERMITTED LAND USES AND DESIGNATIONS WITHIN THE ENTIRE GLENN COVE LAMIRD SHOULD BE UNIFORM. A. There is no evidence or rationale basis for dividing the Glenn Cove LAMIRD into "light industrial/commercial" and "light industrial only". B. It appears that this arises merely as a result of the negotiated agreement between the City and the County. C. One part of the Glenn Cove LAMIRD, that designated "light industrial/commercial" will allow "associated commercial Board of County Commissioners December 6, 2002 Page 4 of 4 activities", while the other portion of the Glenn Cove LAMIRD will only allow "light industrial." It is very difficult to understand how this will occur. D. In reviewing the distinction in uses between the "Glenn Cove Light Industrial/Commercial" zone and the "Light Industrial" zone, many of the permitted uses in both zones have a "commercial" component: (i) home businesses are allowed; (ii) cottage industry is allowed; (iii) auto service and repair is allowed; (iv) boat storage is allowed; (v) lumber yards/building supply is allowed; (vi) small equipment repair, sales and rentals are allowed; (vii) heavy equipment sales and rental services are allowed; (viii) wholesale distribution centers are allowed; (ix) recycling collection facilities are allowed; (x) park and ride lots are allowed; (xi) public trails and paths are allowed. Each of these uses has a component of "commercial" use involving sales, rentals and services provided to the public on-site. Thus, commercial uses are permitted within the entire area. E. Yet, "retail sales and services" are supposed to be excluded in both areas? How can that be consistent with the "allowed" uses, many of which describe sales, rentals and services? F. The only uses that seem to be allowed in the "Light Industrial/Commercial" that are not allowed in the Light Industrial are "eating establishments" and "other commercial uses", which are subject to "discretionary" review and administrative approval. G. The County should further study the permitted and prohibited uses within the Glenn Cove LAMIRD. They should be consistent throughout and should allow associated commercial activities throughout the entire Glenn Cove LAMIRD. —,"'t 1, ­, Ai 0 p i cenano t. e Cove n en CfO V x id x It '0, 1 Bo Logic Botin cy 00 4!G�EN COVEhD. E::) 1 7 5 ............... M. jf:�EPERICK6 ST. C:1 ID ........... 00 3 4 0 -S nD 7 luu Legend: 7 Scenario IBoundwy 25 Foot Contour Intervals 100 Foot Contour Intervals Buildings (1991) S kl L .0 p —,"'t 1, ­, December 5, 2002 Board of County Commissioners Jefferson County Dept. of Community Development 621 Sheridan Port Townsend, WA 98368 re: Glen Cove UDC Amendments and LAMIRD boundary Expansion I truly hope that as you vote on the revised boundary and UDC amendments for Glen Cove you will follow in good faith the agreement reached with the city at your November 26th meeting. After all these years filled with threats of legal action from developers on one side, no -growth proponents on the other and the city in a third and changing position, I think, I hope, you've finally created a plan which will survive an appeal, and it really works! The proposed building sizes and density are quite ample to provide opportunity for a diverse and stable economy well into the future. The boundaries are finally correct and fair! I want to thank Commissioners Richard Wojt and Dan Titterness for working out this plan and agreement with the City. I also want to thank the County staff for all their years of hard work and seemingly endless meetings. Thank you very much! Sincerely, 9 Jim Garrett P.O. BOX 803, PORT TOWNSEND, WA. 98368 USA (360) 379-6615 FAX (360) 379-6624 JEFFERSON COUNTY GUEST LIST HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendment MLA 02-242; Jefferson Count(Tri Area DATE: Friday, December 6 2002 at 7:15 p.m. or later PLACE: Jefferson County Superior Courtroom NAME (Please Print) STREET ADDRESS CITY Testimony? YES NO MAYBE 13 7 revT c�o� �❑ ❑ 1111❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ 1111❑ 1111❑ 1111❑ 1111❑ F1 1111 1111❑ 1111❑ 1111❑ 1111❑ 1111❑ 1111❑