HomeMy WebLinkAboutWetland Delineation 021294038HEINZINGER PFANN FAMILY TRUST
PARCEL 021294038
OWNER
Heinzinger Pfann Family Trust
83 Heinzinger Road
Nordland, WA 98358
FOR SUBMITTAL TO
D a 0r�ad�
DEC -4 2019'
JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
JEFFERSON COUNTY CODE
JCC 18.22.270 Table 1 and 18.22.332 Table 2
Field Investigation and Delineation Conducted By:
W. David Loggy
Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting
P.O. Box 2347
Port Angeles, WA 98362
September 2019
October 9, 2019
Greg Heinzinger
13683 Soquita Dr.
Del Mar, CA 92014-3507
FA DEC - 4 2019
Ref: Parcel 021294038, Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) Placement
Dear Mr. Heinzinger:
As you are aware Clark Land Office surveyed the OHWM for your proposed garage addition.
They surveyed the outer edge of the vegetation on the shore as the boundary of OHWM along the
Southside of the parcel and south quarter of the west side of the parcel. The toe of the armored
511oreiine then became the OHWM on the remaining west side of the parcel.
I reviewed the area and edge of the vegetation that Clark Land surveyed and it is the same
vegetation edge I would have marked, t a foot. The boundary does meet the clarifying criteria for the
OHWM fo. low energy marine environments established by the State Department of Ecology. The
OHWM determinations on low energy Marine environments states: "in low energy environments where
the action of waves and currents Is not sufficient to prevent vegetation establishment below mean higher high
tides the ordinary high water mark is coincident with the landward limit of salt tolerant vegetation" (WAC 173-
22-030 (11)(a)(ii)). Salt Tolerant vegetation at the site includes Distichlis spicata (seashore saltgrass,
Sallcornia virginica (pickle weed), . Atriplex patula (fat -hen saltbush) and Cuscuta salina (salt -marsh dodder).
I selected the toe of the armored shoreline as the OHWM as did Clark Land Office. There were no significant
indicators of algae, lichen or thalamus that would indicate that the long time OHWM was higher on the armored
rock wall so the OHWM level as at the toe of the armored rock wall.
Sincerely;
ak.-e-4)
W. David Loggy
Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting
P.O. Box 2347
Port Angeles, WA 98362
Phones: Office 360-457-3920, Cell 360-775-0901
Email: wdpIogpV@ojypen.c0m
Page 11
Cover Bhotoeraph is looking noth across the lagoon pond towards the P bnnnmbarceI
021294038 and the house and garage.
HEINZINGER 021294038 LSWC September 2019
ERRATA SHEET FOR HEINZINGER REPORT DATED 23 SEP 2019
The statement on page of the report should read as follows.
Cover photofraah is looking north across the lagoon pond from Parcel 02129440 towards
Parcel 021294038 and the house and garage.
Page 12
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CONSULTING COMPANY 3
CRITICAL AREA STUDY 3
PROPERTY OWNER 3
REASON FOR STUDY 3
SITE LOCATION 3
ROUTE INSTURCTIONS 3
PRE-EXISTING INVENTORIES 4
METHODS AND APPROACH 5
PARCEL 021294038 5
WETLANDS
OHWM AND Wetland Boundaries 5
Wetland Criteria 5
Vegetation 6
Soils 6
Hydrology 6
Buffers 6
Wetland Rating 8
NON -WETLANDS
Vegetation
7-8
Soil
7
Hydrology
8
FIGURES PHOTOS AND TABLES
Photo 1- Site Location
3
Photo 2 — USFW Wetland Map
4
Photo 3 — Lagoon Pond and Misty Bay
5
Photo 4 — Aerial View of Lagoon, Wetland, Shoreline and OHWM
6
Photo 5 — Land Ward Shore Edge and OHWM Left Edge Wetland on Parcel
6
Photo 6 — View of Wetland Vegetation
6
APPENDIX I — FIELD DATA SHEETS
APPENDIX II - WETLAND RATING SHEETS
APPENDIX III — DRAWING OF PROJECT AREA
9
10
11
HEINZINGER 021294038 LSWC September 2019
Pa -e 13
WETLAND CRITICAL AREA STUDY
CONSULTING COMPANY:
Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting
W. David Loggy, CPSS
P. O. Box 2347, Port Angeles, WA 98362
CRITICAL AREA STUDY
Wetland Identification, Classification and Delineation
PROPERTY OWNER
Heinzinger Pfann Family Trust
83 Heinzinger Road
Nordland, WA 98358
REASON FOR STUDY:
Fill requirements of Jefferson County Code, Chapter 18.22. Article VII -Wetlands,
Subsection 18.22.300-22.330 and Table 18.00.330 (2) for a single extension to the
Garage.
SITE LOCATION:
Parcel: 021294038
Location: 83 Heinzinger Rd
Nordland, WA 98358
Legal Location: Section 29, Township 30North, Range 01 East,
W.M., Jefferson County Washington.
Latitude and Longitude N 48° 05' 32" - W -122° 41' 80"
ROUTE INSTRUCTIONS:
Starting in Port Townsend travel south
on SR Highway 20 to the intersection of
State Routes (SR) 20 and Airport Cutoff
Rd.. Take Airport Cutoff Rd.; turn left
on Iron Dale Rd, left onto Flagler Rd
(HWY 116) Follow Flagler Rd. and
follow it 3.5 miles and turn left onto
Blue Heron Road and then right on to
Heinzinger Rd and follow it to the
parcel. (Figure 1).
Photo I — Site Location
HEINZINGER 021294038 LSWC September 2019
PRE-EXISTING INVENTORIES
Jefferson County data base
identifies the shoreline area along
the south tip and west side of the
Parcel 021294038 as wetland.
Parcel 02129040, south and
abutting the south side of Parcel
021294038, is entirely identified as
wetland on the county data base.
The USFWS Wetland Inventory
(WTI) identifies 2 wetland
categories (Figure 2). Both of the
wetlands are identified as estuarine
categories. The wetland area on the
very south tip of Parcel 02129040
is identified as an Estuarine
Unconsolidated bottom subtidal
rialleh � FmMwelwf-mn¢uF Ynnnd � inks �.iwr.ww� wwwwr.
(EIUBL) Wetland. The other ■ FNa��ak b= aka
■ EeluaMeeM Mahe WeYaM � Frmhxaler Pontl ■RfvaiMa
wetland which abuts the west
property line of the Parcel 021294038 and south of Parcel 02129403 is identified as an Estuarine
Unconsolidated / Unconsolidated Regularly Flooded (2UB/USN) Wetland. Washington State
Department of Ecology use the same wetland area classification as the USF & W.
Page 14
Photo 2 USFW Wetland Map
11-L
iG�i Wetlands Inve - USF&W WETLAND MAP
METHOD AND APPROACH
A two Level Assessment was used to identify wetlands on Parcel 021294038. The first level of
assessment included review of existing information conducted to develop background knowledge
of physical features, and to identify the potential for wetland occurrence on the parcel. The
resource documents available for preliminary review of the site conditions included: USDA Soil
Conservation Service (SCS), "Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area Washington", 2013,
Jefferson County and Google aerial photography, and Jefferson County Planning Department
data.
The second level of assessment included on-site investigation to determine the location of
wetlands and upland sites. On-site investigation determined and verified the presents of an
emergent wetland, a lagoon and shoreline. The on-site wetland type was based on the three -factor
approach involving indicators of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils and wetland hydrology as
presented in the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual:
Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Region (Version 2.0), May 2010. The shoreline areas
were determined using the fish and wildlife wetland and deepwater habitats classification. Hydric
soils are classified using Filed Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 8.1, 2017
Wetlands are classified as to category using the Washington State Wetland Rating System for
Western Washington -October -2014, Effective January 2015, Washington State Department of
Ecology's Publication No. 03-06-029 and applicable Rating Forms Effective January 1, 2015
(Appendix II).
HEINZINGER 021294038 LSWC September 2019
Page 15
Wetland buffer width was determined by the standard establish in the Jefferson County Code
(JCC 18.22.27, Table 18.22.270 (1): Stream Buffers and (JCC) 18.22.330, Table 18.22.330(2),
PARCEL 021294038
The parcel 021294038 is 1.17 acres in size. The parcel is dominantly an old pasture site that
serves as a lawn. Trees and shrubs are part of land scraping with most of the trees located on the
north end of the property. Three sides of the parcel are abutted by other parcels. The west side is
the waters of Kilisut Harbor. The parcel slopes towards the south and southwest. There is an
existing house and a two stall garage present on the parcel. A building extension is proposed on
the east side of the garage.
WETLAND
OHWM and Wetland Boundaries
The wetland on Parcel 021294308 is a wetland associated with
a lagoon (Appendix II) (Photo 3). The shoreline of the
property representing the wetland and upland boundary and
plotted. (Appendix 111) The aerial view of the wetland of the
lagoon is presented in Photo 4(Page 5). The lagoon consist of
an emergent vegetation ground cover, a saline pond and a
gravel berm. A channel connects the lagoon to Mystery Bay
allowing tidal influx into and out of the lagoon (Photo 4). The
vegetated portion of the wetland of the Coastal Lagoon is
shown in Figures 5 and 6 on Page 6. The size of the wetland
on Parcel 021294038 is approximately 3,312.8 square feet
(0.08 acres). The vegetation extends from the Ordinary High
Water Mark (OHWM) to the shore edge. The OHWM was surveyed by Clark Land Office
located in Port Angeles, WA. The OHWM was essentially the water side edge of the vegetation
on south and one half of the west side of the parcel.. A portion of the parcel shoreline is armored
on the north half of Parcel 021294308. The bottom water edge of the armored shoreline was
identified as the OHWM for that portion of the shore (Photo 5).
Photo 3 — Lagoon pond and
Misty Bay beyond the sand bar
I
TABLE I
WETLAND LOCATION
SIZE IN FT
Wetland Vegetation on Parcel
021094308
3,312.8
Gravel Berm (non -vegetated)
18,811.0
Total Emergent
28,043.0
Total Pond
20,523.0
Total Lagoon
46,377.0
HEINZINGER 021294038 LSWC September 2019
Wetland Criteria
Vegetation: The emergent wetland between the land ward
shore line and the OHWM is band of low growing saline
tolerant plants ranging from 0 to 75 foot wide. The wetland is a deposit area for drift wood
(Photo 3). The dominant plant is pickleweed (Salicornia virginica). The other plants besides
pickleweed is fat -hen saltbush (Atriplex patula). The pickleweed has small areas of symbiotic
salt -marsh dodder (Cuscuta Salina). Salt -marsh dodder is shown as the light yellow-orange areas
in Photo 6. Other plants are present but only count for:5 5 percent of the vegetative plant cover.
Page 16
Photo 5 — Land Ward Shore Edge. Left
Edge of Wetland And OHWM on
Parcel
Photo 6— View of Wetland
Vegetation(Pickle Weed) Looking From
Shore edge Towards Port Townsend
Across Kilisut Harbor. Yellowish
Vegetation is Salt -Marsh Dodder
Soils: The Jefferson County Soil Survey map identifies the soil supporting the emergent
vegetation to be beach sand and gravel. The soils associated with Wetland 021294038(Plot 1)
consist of moderately deep deposits of sand and small gravel with organic material and soil fines
to bind and stabilize the sand and gravel layers developed by tidal action. The soil materials are
inundated by tidal water on regular periods. The soils are inundated enough to provide saline
conditions supporting saline hydrophytic vegetation and hydrology.
Hydrology: Wetland 021294038 as part of the lagoon receives water from the tidal influx and
winter storm surges.
Buffers — There are two different buffer widths required for this project and this parcel. The first
is the 75 foot buffer for the wetland associated with the salt water lagoon. The other is for the
150 foot buffer for OHWM for the Type "S" Shoreline Critical Area. The two critical area buffer
widths merge near the south east corner of the existing house. The critical area buffers that
provided the most width was selected to establish either the wetland critical area or the OHWM
critical buffer. Buffer boundary is show in drawing in Appendix III.
HEINZINGER 021294038 LSWC September 2019
Wetland Rating:
Table II
Compiled Wetland Rating Information on Parcel 962700032
Buffers for Moderate Impact Land Uses
Page 17
NON -WETLANDS
Vegetation - The non -wetland land area consists of a relict hay field that is now maintained as a
lawn. The north west corner of the parcel has scatter conifers and other broad leaf trees. The southern
part of the shoreline support a band of Nootka rose while the rest of the shoreline going north is armored.
Soils — The upland onsite soil at the upland plot site does not meet the range of characteristics of
the Tukey Soils that the map shows of the parcel in the Jefferson County Soil Survey. The soil at the
upland plot consists of a 6 inch surface of dark reddish brown fine sandy loam overlying a 6 inch thick
sub surface of dark brown loamy fine sand. Subsoils layers in order of depth and thickness are a 5 inch of
HEINZINGER 021294038 LSWC September 2019
Wetland Ratings Function Scores
I~
0
Function
Improve
Hydrologic
Habitat
E
ro
o
iv e"
H2O
rn
3
Quality
o
H
M
M
u
U
pp
1.Site
Potential
c
n
3
C
3 a
M
M
H
W
0
„
2. Landscape
Fy
c
Potential
F"
Un
G
L
L
M
A. Value
021294308
*0.3
Y
Score
N/A
N/A
N/A
Vl
II
75'
R
U�
OHWM
Y N/A N/A N/Az
150'
�z
„a
w
°x
H O
x
--
JCC Table 18.22.330(2) Wetland Categories Rating Scores For Category II
JCC Table 18.22.270 OHWM for Type "S" Shoreline
*Boundaries of wetlands were traversed or serve ed. **Buffer width is shown on drawing in Appendix III of re ort
NON -WETLANDS
Vegetation - The non -wetland land area consists of a relict hay field that is now maintained as a
lawn. The north west corner of the parcel has scatter conifers and other broad leaf trees. The southern
part of the shoreline support a band of Nootka rose while the rest of the shoreline going north is armored.
Soils — The upland onsite soil at the upland plot site does not meet the range of characteristics of
the Tukey Soils that the map shows of the parcel in the Jefferson County Soil Survey. The soil at the
upland plot consists of a 6 inch surface of dark reddish brown fine sandy loam overlying a 6 inch thick
sub surface of dark brown loamy fine sand. Subsoils layers in order of depth and thickness are a 5 inch of
HEINZINGER 021294038 LSWC September 2019
Page 18
very dark grayish brown very fine sandy loam and 19 inches of dark brown single grain very fine sand.
The soils are excessively drained with high infiltration.
Hydrology — There was no hydrology present to 30 inches from the surface of the soil.
HEINZINGER 021294038 LSWC September 2019
Page 19
APPENDIX I
FIELD DATA SHEETS
HEINZINGER 021294038 LSWC September 2019
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA F°RM —Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Regions
Project/Site: Parcel 021294308 City/County:
/Jefferson
Sam lin Date: 7/19/19
Applicant/Owner: Paul and Mil Heinzin er State: WA
Wetland Hydrolqgy Present? Yes El No
I Sam lin Point: U land Plot
Investigator(s): W. David Lo , Loggy Soil & Wetland Consulting Section, Township, Range: Sec. 29 T30N ROLE
Landform hillslo e, terrace, etc): Terrace Local relief concave convex none): Concave Slope (%) 5
Subregion LRR . A Lat: N 48° 03' 32"
Lon : W 122'41'80" Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name TuC - Tuk2y Series see any correction in Soil Section
NWI classification: EIUBL, S2UB/USN
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of ear? Yes
No If no explain in Remarks.
Are vegetation 0, Soil , or Ii drolo significantly disturbed?
Are "Normal Circumstances" resent? Yes Q No
Are vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑ naturally Problematic?
if needed, explain any answers in Remarks
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site man showine sampling mint locations_ trRneects_ imnnrtnnt fOnfume etr
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ❑ No ®
Is the Sampled Area
fydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No ®
Within a Wetland? Yes ❑ No
Wetland Hydrolqgy Present? Yes El No
Remarks:
V El r.lA I IVA — use sclentuic names 01 Diants
Absolute Dominant
Trees Stratum Plot size:30' radius) % Cover Species?
Indicator
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species That
Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A) 1
(B) 5
1.
2.
Total; Number of dominant
Species Across All Strata:
3.
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FCW, or FAC:
(A/B) =20
5,
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 10'
Radius)
1•
OBL species
X 1 =
2.
FACW species
X2=
3•
FAC species
X3=
4.
FACU species
X4=
5•
UPL Species
X5=
6.
Column totals
(A)
(B)
7.
Prevalence index = B/A =
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1. Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑ 2.Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3. Prevalence Index is <3.0'
❑ 4. Morphological Adaptations' (Provide
supporting data in Remarks or on a separate
sheet)
El 5. Wetland Non -Vascular Plants'
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'
(Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ❑ No
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1.64 Radius)
1. Dactylis glomerata 20
Yes
FACU
2. Agrostis spp. 20
Yes
FAC
3. Hypochaeris glabra 20
Yes
FACU
4. Festua pratensis 15
Yes
FACU
5. Taraxacum officinale 10
Yes
FACU
6. Poa sp. 10
No
FAC
7. Trifolium pratense 5
No
FACU
100=Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10'
Radius
1.
2.
—Total Cover
a
/o Bare Ground In Herb Stratum
Remarks:
uN Army corps of t✓ngmeers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast — Version 2.0
C�rnnlinn Anin*• rf.,rn. i . iL #
Profile Description: (Describe t o the depth needed to document the indicators or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
Secondary Indicators 2 or more required)
(inches)
Texture
Remarks
Color
%
Color (moist)
%
Type'
LocZ
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
moist
❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
0-6
5YR 2.5/2
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
fsl
1 f granular structure; 3 c, in, f, & of roots; <5%
❑ FAC=Neutral Test (175)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Other (Explain in remarks)
❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface (138)
❑ Frost -Heave hummocks (D7)
Field Observations
gr vel, 2% stones bnd .
6-12
7.5YR 3/2
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
® Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
Ifs
2 f granular structure parting to single grain; 5%
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No
includes capillary fringe)___
Describe Recorded Data stream gauge. monitoring
ravel, 2 f & of roots; gw bnd
12-17
1OYR 3/2
vfsl
2 m subangular blocky structure; <5% gravel; 1 f
roots; gw bnd .
17-36
7.5YR 3/4
Ivfs
Single grain; <5% gravel.
'Type: &-Concentrations, 13 --Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix. CXS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: P1=Pore lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3'
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10)
❑ Sandy Redox (SS)
Sandy Redox (SS)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA
IV] Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (e Keept
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks 3
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
MLRA 1)
❑ Depleted Matrix (173)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (176)
❑ Depleted Matrix (173)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (177)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (176)
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
disturbed or problematic.
❑ Redox Depressions (178)
Restrictive Layer (if present);
Type:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
ri Y "K"EUG Y
Wetland H drol Indicators
Primary Indicators minimum of one required; check all that apply)
Secondary Indicators 2 or more required)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except
Water Stained Leaves (139) (MRLA 1, 2,
❑ High Water Table (A2)
MLRA 1, 2,4A, and 4B)
4A and 4B)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Salt Crust (B11)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
(C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (DI') (LRR A)
❑ FAC=Neutral Test (175)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Other (Explain in remarks)
❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface (138)
❑ Frost -Heave hummocks (D7)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
® Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
® Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No ® Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No
includes capillary fringe)___
Describe Recorded Data stream gauge. monitoring
well aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
u�, Army Corps of Engmeers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast — Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA F°RM — Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast Regions
Project/Site: Parcel 021294308 City/County:
/JeffersonSam
ling Date: 7/19/19
Applicant/Owner: Paul and Mil Heinzin er State: WA
etland Hydrolm Present? Yes ® No ❑
I Sam lin Point: Wetland Plot
Investi ato s): W. David Loggy, Loggy Soil & Wetland ConsultinZ Section, Townshi , Range: Sec. 29 T30N ROI W
Landform hillslo e, terrace etc): Terrace Local relief concave convex none): Concave Sloe '/ 5
Subregion (LRR): A Lat: N 48.03' 32"
Lon W 122'41'80" Datum:
Soil Ma Unit Name TuC - Tuke Series see ancorrection in Soil Section
NWI classification: EIUBL, S2UB/USN
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site ical for this time oryear? Yes
No If no, ex lain in Remarks.
Are vegetation , Soil ❑, or H drolo significantly disturbed?
Are "Normal Circumstances" resent? Yes Z No
Are vegetation ❑, Soil E1, or HydroloU ❑ naturally problematic?
If needed, explain any answers in Remarks)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site man showinu samnlitip noini Inr:0innt_ trstmPeta_ imnnrtant Gainrn ..to
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ® No ❑
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑
Within a Wetland? Yes ® No ❑
etland Hydrolm Present? Yes ® No ❑
Remarks:
V D,E A i u — use scientwc names of ainnts
Absolute Dominant
Trees Stratum Plot size:30' radius % Cover S ecies?
Indicator
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species That
Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A) 3
1•
2.
Total; Number of dominant
Species Across All Strata:
(B) 3
3•
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FCW, or FAC:
(A/B) =100
5,
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
5anlinobrub Stratum (Plot size: 10'
Radius
1•
OBL species
X 1 =
2•
FACW species
X2=
3 •
FAC species
X3=
4•
FACU species
X4=
5•
UPL Species
X5=
6.
Column totals
(A)
(B)
7.
Prevalence index = B/A =
=Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1. Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
® 2.Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3. Prevalence Index is <3.0'
❑ 4. Morphological Adaptations' (Provide
supporting data in Remarks or on a separate
sheet)
❑ 5. Wetland Non -Vascular Plants'
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'
(Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes ® No ❑
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1.64 Radius)
1. Salicornia virginiea
80 Yes
OBL
2. Atriplex patula
10 Yes
FACW
3 . Distichlis spicata
5 Yes
FACW
4,
5 •
6.
7.
100=Total Cover
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 10'
Radius)
1.
2.
=Total Cover
o
/o Bare Ground 111 Herb Stratum 5
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast — Version 2.0
SOIL
Samnlinv Pnint• i Inlanei nlnt
Profile Description: (Describe t o the depth needed to document the indicators or confirm the absence of indicators)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
check all that apply)
Seconda In icatars 2 or m wired
(inches)
Texture
Remarks
Color
%
Color (moist)
%
I Typel
Loc2
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
moist
❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery
® Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
0-20
IOYR 311
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Geomorphic Position (132)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
c &,f
Single grain; organic material in soil pores.
❑ FAC=Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Other (Explain in remarks)
❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface (138)
❑ Frost-I•Ieave 1•1ummocks (D7)
Is &
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑
No ❑ Depth (inches): Remarks
Water Table Present? Yes ❑
No ❑ Depth (inches): Remarks
fine
No ❑ Depth (inches): Remarks Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes ® No ❑
includes capillary fringe)__
Describe Recorded Data strealn gauge, monitoring well aerial photos. previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: vegetation and soils are inundated by tidal water. Vegetation and soils are between OHWM and the shoreline.
ravel
'Type: GConcentrations, D --Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix. CXS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PI=Pore lining, RC=Root Channel, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils 3:
❑ Sandy Redox (SS)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Sandy Redox (SS) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except ® Other (Explain in Remarks 3
M LECA 1) Soils are coase and find sands, grave that have organic
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Loamy G [eyed Matrix
materials in the pores between the sand and gravel
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Depleted Matrix (173)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
El Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
particles. Soils are inundated by fides.
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present, unless
disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ® No ❑
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators minimum of one required;
check all that apply)
Seconda In icatars 2 or m wired
�a.
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except
❑ Water Stained Leaves (139) (MRLA 1,
❑ High Water Table (A2)
MLRA 1, 2,4A, and 4B)
2,4A and 4B)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Salt Crust (B11)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery
® Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (0)
(C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Geomorphic Position (132)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D 1') (LRR A)
❑ FAC=Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Other (Explain in remarks)
❑ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated concave Surface (138)
❑ Frost-I•Ieave 1•1ummocks (D7)
Field Observations
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑
No ❑ Depth (inches): Remarks
Water Table Present? Yes ❑
No ❑ Depth (inches): Remarks
Saturation Present? Yes ❑
No ❑ Depth (inches): Remarks Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes ® No ❑
includes capillary fringe)__
Describe Recorded Data strealn gauge, monitoring well aerial photos. previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: vegetation and soils are inundated by tidal water. Vegetation and soils are between OHWM and the shoreline.
u Fumy corps or trigmeers Western Mountains, Valleys and Coast —Version 2.0
Page 110
APPENDIX II
WETLAND RATING SHEETS
WETLAND 021294308
HEINZINGER 021294038 LSWC September 2019
Wetland name or number Heinzinger 021294038
RATING SUMMARY — Western Washington
Name of wetland (or ID #): Hainzinger 021294038 Date of site visit:
W. David loggy
Rated byLoggy Soil & Wetland Consulting Trained by Ecology?_ Yes x No Date of trainingllie-9t2o, 2017
HGM Class used for rating _ Wetland has multiple HGM classes?_Y X N
NOTE: Form is not complete without the figures requested (figures can be combined),
Source of base aerial photo/map cllallam County& Google Photos, usFW, DRN & WF&W m aps
OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY (based on functions_ or special characteristics X )
1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS
Category I —Total score = 23 - 27
Category II — Total score = 20 - 22
Category I I I — Tota I sco re = 16 -19
Category IV —Total score = 9 - 15
FUNCTION Improving Hydrologic Habitat
Water Quality
Circle the appropriate ratings
ite Potential H M L H M L H M L
andscape Potential H M L H M L H M L
Value H M L H M L H M L TOTAL
'core Based on
tatings
2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland
CHARACTERISTIC
CATEGORY
Estuarine
I II
Wetland of High Conservation Value
I
Bog
I
Mature Forest
I
I
Old Growth Forest
Coastal Lagoon
I II
Interdunal
[ II III IV
None of the above
Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update
Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015
Score for each
function based
on three
rating of ratings
is not
important)
9 = H,H,H
8 = H,H,M
7 = H,H,L
7 = H,M,M
6 = H,M,L
6 = M,M,M
5 = H,L,L
5 = M,M,L
4 = M,L,L
3 = L, L, L
Wetland name or number Helnzinger021294038
CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS
Wetland Type
Category
Check off any criteria that a ly. to the wetland. Circle the cote ory when thea prnpriate criteria are mei.
SC 1.0. Estuarine wetlands
Does the wetland meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands?
EDThe dominant water regime is tidal,
Vegetated, and
With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt Yes —Go to SC 1.1 I No= Not an estuarine wetland
SC 1.1. Is the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area
Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151?
Yes = Category I No - Go to SC 1.2
Cat. I
SC 1.2. Is the wetland unit at least 1 ac in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions?
f" he wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing, and has less
than 10% cover of non-native plant species. (If non-native species are Sportino, see page 25)
Cat. I
«a At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un -grazed or un -
mowed grassland.
The wetland has at least two of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or
Cat. II
contiguous freshwater wetlands. Yes = Category I No = Category II
SC 2.0. Wetlands of High Conservation Value (WHCV)
SC 2.1. Has the WA Department of Natural Resources updated their website to include the list of Wetlands of Hih
Conservation Value? Yes —Go to SC 2.2 No —Go to SC 2.3
Cat. I
SC 2.2. Is the wetland listed on the WDNR database as a Wetland of High Conservation Value?
Yes = Category I No = Not a WHCV
SC 2.3. Is the wetland in a Section/Township/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland?
ht#p:Ilww V 1.dnr.wa.govin ho/re fdeskIdatasearchlwnhowe tIands.pdf
Yes —Contact WNHP/WDNR and go to SC 2.4 No - Not a WHCV
SC 2.4. Has WDNR identified the wetland within the S/T/R as a Wetland of High Conservation Value and listed it on
their website? Yes = Category I No = Not a WHCV
SC 3.0. Bogs
Does the wetland (or any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key
below. If you answer YESyou will still need to rate thewetland based on itsfunctions.
SC 3.1. Does an area within the wetland unit have organic soil horizons, either peats or mucks, that compose 16 in or
more of the first 32 in of the soil profile? Yes — Go to SC 3.3 1 No — Go to SC 3.Z
SC 3.2. Does an area within the wetland unit have organic soils, either peats or mucks, that are less than 16 in deep
over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floati ng on too of a lake or
pond? Yes — Go to SC 3.3 No = Is not a bo
SC 3.3. Does an area with peats or mucks have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND at least a 30%
cover of plant species listed in Table 4? Yes = Is a Category I bog No — Go to SC 3.4
NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory, you may substitute that criterion by
measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16 in deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the
plant species in Table 4 are present, the wetland is a bog.
Cat. I
SC 3.4. Is an area with peats or mucks forested (> 30% cover) with Sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar,
western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Engelmann spruce, or western white pine, AND any of the
species (or combination of species) listed in Table 4 provide more than 30% of the cover under the canopy?
Yes = Is a Category I bog No =1s not a bog
Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 16
Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015
Wetland name or number Heinzinaer02129400e
SC 4.0. Forested Wetlands
Does the wetland have at least 1 contiguous acre of forest that meets one of these criteria for the WA
Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? If you answer YE3you will still need to rate
thewetland based on itsfunctions.
0 Old-growth forests (west of Cascade crest): Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multi -layered
canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha) that are at least 200 years of
age OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of 32 in (81 cm) or more.
0 Mature forests (west of the Cascade Crest): Stands where the largest trees are 80- 200 years old OR the
species that make up the canopy have an average diameter (dbh) exceeding 21 in (53 cm).
Yes= Category 1 I No = Not a forested wetland for this section
Cat. I
SC 5.0. Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons
Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon?
IE The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from
marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks
OThe lagoon in which the wetland is located contains ponded water that is saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt)
during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon -Le -111d, to be measured near the bottom)
Cat.
Yes -- Go to SC 5.1 No = Not a wetland in a coastal lagoon
SC 5.1. Does the wetland meet all of the following three conditions?
Ofhe wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less
than 20% cover of aggressive, opportunistic plant species (see list of species on p. 100).
Cat. II
ZAt least Y4 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un -grazed or un -
mowed grassland.
L27The wetland is larger than 1/10 ac (4350 ft2)
Yes = Category I No = Category II
SC 6.0. Interdunal Wetlands
Is the wetland west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? If
you answer yesyou will still need to rate the wetland based on its habitat functions.
In practical terms that means the following geographic areas:
L27 Long Beach Peninsula: Lands west of SR 103
IN Grayland-Westport: Lands west of SR 105
Cat I
ZT Ocean Shores-Copalis: Lands west of SR 115 and SR 109
Yes — Go to SC 6.1 1 No = not an interdunal wetland for rating
SC 6.1. Is the wetland 1 ac or larger and scores an 8 or 9 for the habitat functions on the form (rates H,H,H or H,H,M
Cat. II
for the three aspects of function)? Yes= CategoryI No — Go to SC 6.2
SC 6.2. Is the wetland 1 ac or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is 1 ac or larger?
Yes = Category 11 No — Go to SC 6.3
Cat. III
SC 6.3. Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 ac, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and 1 ac?
Yes = Category III No = Category IV
Cat. IV
Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics
If you answered No for all types, enter "Not Applicable" on Summary Form
Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update 17
Rating Form — Effective January 1, 2015
Page 11
APPENDIX III
DRAWING OF PROJECT AREA
HEINZINGER 021294038 LSWC September 2019
AA ch en n0 S
u
°
m
m
m 8M
d
m
3O6N
304
C -
ay.► _9 3
I�a�S pain Or IV
Np
,tiff •stiff �-���
Kilisut Harbor
£y tv -
,z8E ,- --;i�w
a�P3�a�f1
M jo ,0£ .90 N
4
LO
z
LOGGY SOIL AND
WETLAND CONSULTING
P. O. Box 2347
Port Angels, WA 98362-
(0) 360-457-3920
(F) 360-057-0131
Lu
k�
cr-
C>
`
a
c
d
�
_
m
3
'
ii
V
,
C
1
++ C
V1 �
y
1�i ONl
1
R
e y a
------ -----
3
_---_.------------------
N------------
----------------
_
£y tv -
,z8E ,- --;i�w
a�P3�a�f1
M jo ,0£ .90 N
4
LO
z
LOGGY SOIL AND
WETLAND CONSULTING
P. O. Box 2347
Port Angels, WA 98362-
(0) 360-457-3920
(F) 360-057-0131
Lu
k�
cr-
C>