Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
MLA19-00122 HMP Kala Point Trees 965000372 964700081 964700082
Habitat Management Plan PENINSULA ENVIRONMENTAL r4_' GROUP, INC. Report Date: Septemberg, 2019 Project Numbe To: Kala Point Bluff Management Committee Project Address:Ka la Pont Owner Association }, Jefferson County Parcels: 955000372 and 964700082 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. Prepared by: 824 E. 81' Street, Suite ❑ I Port Angeles, WA 98362 � Office: (360) 504-3825 I Online: www.peninsulaenvironmental.com 61 Project Name: 2019 Shoreline Tree Pruning Habitat Management Plan © zoig, Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. All rights reserved. I o �,_ din Justin Vendettuoli I Wetland Biologist I Wetland Professional In -Training John Bornsworth I Senior Urban Forester & Ecologist I Board Certified Master Arborist Community Specific — Resource Specific Planning Port Angeles I Port Townsend I Olympia Contents Consultants: .......................................................................................................................................... 0 1 Summary ............................................................................................:...........................................1 zBackground.....................................................................................................................................2 2.1 Professional Assumptions & Limitations/Methods.................................................................. a 3 Regulatory Setting........................................................................................... .............................. 3 4 Project Description.........................................................................................................................4 4.1 Site History ..............................................................................................................................4 4.2 Site Properties ........................................................................................................................4 4.3 Landscape Characterization....................................................................................................4 4.3.1 Observed Plant Communities.............................................................................................. 5 4.4 Project Action Area........................................................................................................ . 6 5 Protected Species & Habitat Identification...................................................................................... 7 5.1 Listed Species, Critical and Priority Habitats............................................................................ 7 5.2 Species Descriptions and Their Associated Habitat................................................................. 7 6 Effects of Action.............................................................................................................................. 8 6.1 Effects on Listed Species and Critical Habitats........................................................................8 7 Mitigation Recommendations....................................................................................... .............9 8 Conclusions......................................................................................................................................9 gClosing................................................................................................. ...........................10 g.1 Consultant Qualifications..............................................................................................10 10 General Assumptions and Limitations........................................................................................... 11 11 Figures.......................................................................................................................................... 12 12 References................................................................................................................................... 1g 13 Appendix A: Tree Action Recommendations................................................................................. 21 Table 1. Properties of the site assessed, as of the time of assessment.....................................................4 Table 1.Occurrence of listed species and critical habitats near project area ............................................ 7 Figure 1. The overall location of the requested tree actions. Requests are for Kala Point's central marine bluff. The extent of Kala Point's community is shown with a blue outline ............................................. 12 Figure z. Tree requests for case C1g-1, as shown in Appendix A ............................................................ 13 Figure 3. Tree requests for case C19-2, as shown in Appendix A............................................................14 Figure 4. Tree requests for case C19-3, as shown in Appendix A ............................................................ 15 Figure 5. Tree requests for case C19-4, as shown in Appendix A............................................................16 Figure 6. Tree requests for case C1g-5, as shown in Appendix A.............................................................17 Figure 7. Tree requests for case C1g-6, as shown in Appendix A............................................................18 og-of-2oig Kala Point 20ig Bluff Tree Actions — Habitat Management Plan I The Kala Point Owners Association (KPOA) proposes vegetation management through removal, pruning, trimming, and hedging of trees and vegetation along their central coastal bluff, collectively addressed in this report as the "Tree Actions". Trees actions are primarily located on three contiguous parcels KPOA owned parcels,'] 65000372, g64700o8i, andW6470oo8x, situated on coastal bluffs adjacent to Port Townsend ay. Some,trpes actionare also on�.ndividual pro�pprties of Kala Point residents: parcels g650000a3�g6Sa00022'; g65oaooac3, 9647c0 ,. and 96470005' . This report outlines our site - specific analysis and evaluation, observed wildlife and characteristics of habitat and specifications and site -specific recommendations for each tree. In total, KPOA plans the modification of 54 trees, so of which are full removals, the rest achieved through a variety of pruning recommendations. Appendix A is a full list of the 54trees, including any geotechnical recommendations, arboricultural recommendations, and this reports specific wildlife biologist recommendations. All but 11 of the proposed actions are within the following environmentaIjurisdictions: Natural Shoreline Jurisdiction as identified by Jefferson County Code 18.25 Shoreline Master Program • Geohazard Critical Area as identified by Jefferson County Code 18.22 Critical Areas. Tree modifications within these jurisdictions require a Habitat Impact Analysis to comply with local environmental regulations, specifically on how the proposed project will impact threatened and endangered species and habitat. Following a site investigation of the above -mentioned parcels, and a review of the specific trees and vegetation proposed for modification, we have determined that there will be no effect on the WDFW- listed species and critical habitats listed above following completion of the proposed project. There are not priority habitats within the project area, and the adjacent priority habitat and species will not be impacted by modifications within the project area. This determination of no net loss is contingent upon the assumption that project specifications and mitigation detailed in the accompanying Peninsula Environmental Group arborist report 09-09-203.9 "Shoreline Tree Pruning Request" shall be followed. Thank you for the opportunity to evaluate and address your project. We appreciate your business and look forward to working with you in the future. If you have questions do not hesitate to contact us. Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. (PEG) is a Western -Washington based company specializing in advanced evaluation and interpretation of natural resources in urban areas, rural communities and natural ecosystems. We provide excellent evidence -based, scientific natural resource consulting and stewardship services. Our analysis, evaluation, interpretation and recommendations are included in this letter. Page 1 1 of 25 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. I Wyww.permsulaeg.con3 I (360) 5o4-38z5 og-os-2o1g Kala Point 2oi9 Bluff Tree Actions — Habitat Management Plan Background In August of 2oig Kala Point Owner's Association (the "Client") asked Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. (the "Consultant") to prepare a Habitat Management Plan for Jefferson County as a requirement per Section 18.22.200 JCC. The purpose of this plan is to address whether the proposed actions described in this report will impact any Endangered Species ortheir Critical Habitats located within or adjacent to the development location. Our specific Scope of Services forthis project: ■ Evaluate the project area and action areas for any potential Endangered Species and their Critical Habitats. • Assess potential impacts to the identified Critical Habitats that could occur with the proposed development plans. • Provide a mitigation plan to reduce potential impacts on listed species and their habitats. 2.2 Professional Assumptions & Limitations/Methods This report summarizes the data collected during our site reconnaissance and assessment, our conversations regarding the project, and our professional opinions and recommendations. The results and recommendations of this report represent our professional opinion compiled from biological forensics, information provided to us, referenced material and our experience. Our recommendations are compiled with industry standards, best -available -science and currently accepted best management practices. Additional project specific limitations. • Consultant's employees visited the property on August 7th, 2019. This report summarizes site characteristics as they were observed this day only. • This report is intended for the exclusive use of the Client and their agents and only for specific application to the referenced property. This report should not be applied to any other wetland or other property for any purpose. • The GPS unit used in this delineation had a 1-2ft accuracy during assessment. The points gathered are to aid in displaying the trees and vegetation locations, but are not the equivalent of a surveyor's accuracy, which is typically to <zcm. • Field GPS points were gathered using the EOS Arrow soo, which has sub -meter accuracy. ■ Geospatial analyses were made using ESRI's ArcGIS Pro 2.4.1, with measurements made on projected coordinate system NAD83 2011 US Feet for Washington State (North). • Parcel, contour, existing wetland, and stream layers were sourced from Jefferson County online GIS portal. • Climate data was gathered from the NRCS National Water Climate Center (2019). • Map imagery is ESRI's default basemap imagery. Page 2 of25 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. I www.peninsulaeg.cgyi I (36o) 504-3S25 og-of-2oig Kala Point 2o19 Bluff Tree Actions — Habitat Management Plan This report complies with Jefferson County Critical Area Ordinances (JCC 18.22) related to habitat conservation (JCC 18.22.20o Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas) and habitat preservation within shorelines (JCC 18.25 Shoreline Master Program). Within 200 feet of the Strait of Juan de Fuca, Puget Sound or another large water body, permitted actions are administered within the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program as required bythe Washington Department of Ecology. Jefferson County Natural Shoreline Buffer is defined by the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program (Chapter 18.25.210(3)(c)) as having a purpose to "protect from harm or adverse impact shoreline areas that are intact, have minimally degraded functions and processes, or are relatively free of human influence". These areas are designated based on the following factors: (A) The shoreline is mostly ecologically intact and therefore currently performing an important or irreplaceable function or process that would be damaged by human activity; or (B) The shoreline, whether minimally disturbed or intact, represents an ecosystem type or geologic feature that is of particular scientific and/or educational interest; or (C) The shoreline contains undisturbed wetlands, estuaries, feeder bluffs, unstable slopes, coastal dunes, and/or accretional spits; or (D) The shoreline is unable to support new development or uses without significant adverse impacts to ecological functions or processes; or (E) The shoreline has the potential to regain natural conditions with minimal or no restoration activity; or (F) The shoreline possesses serious development limitations or human health and safety risks due to the presence of environmental hazards related to flooding, channel migration, erosion or landslides and similar occurrences. Impacts to shoreline jurisdictions require mitigation to ensure a no net loss of shoreline ecosystem services, functions, and habitat. Applicants are required to assess ecosystem functions and services that may be impacted by the proposed actions. ions comply with -JCC- .25.270 Critical are -shoreline buffers, and ecological protection. must - JCC Chapter 18.22 Critical Areas outlines the protection standards applied to critical areas in Jefferson County. The m f the tree actions take place within a Geologically Hazards Area, which is define 2.1fso the ro n standards are outlined in 18.22.x o. r this project C18. 22.170(4) V etation Retention is the applicable regulatory requirement. The potential geological hazard o t e proposed project has been assessed and reported on by a licensed geologist in the 2019 report by Crescent Environmental PLLC. Page 13 of 25 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. www.peninsulaeq (360) 504-3825 og-o1-2019 Kala Point 201g Bluff Tree Actions — Habitat Management Plan EL 4.1 Site History Kala Point is a community of common -interest residential homeowners association. The properties along the bluff are given the opportunity to request tree modifications along the shoreline once every three years on a rotating basis. The bluff is split into three sections, and each year one section puts forth their requests for evaluation by KPOA, consulting experts, and Jefferson County. This process has been ongoing, with Peninsula Environmental Group having assisted forthe past 3 years. 4.2 Site Properties County Parcel Zoning Elevation Range Aspect Existing Structures Jefferson 965o00372, 964700081, 96470o082, 965000023, 965000022, 965000020, 964700056, and 964700055 RR-5 - Rural Residential 0-140 vertical feet, from shore to bluff crest East northeast Fully developed upland Critical Areas Geohazard & Natural Shoreline Jurisdiction 4.3 Landscape Characterization • Washington's Natural Heritage Program classifies this forest type a component of the "North Pacific Maritime Dry-Mesic Douglas -fir Western Hemlock Forest" and the 'North Pacific Maritime Mesic-Wet Douglas -fir Western Hemlock Forest" ecosystem depending on topology (Rocchio & Crawford 2015). Project area is situated on a moderate to near -vertical marine bluff, ranging from sea level to 120 feet vertical height. Aspect is east, made up of a mosaic of closed -canopy and open canopy trees dependent on level of recent disturbance. Upland from the coastal bluff, from their development buffers/setbacks to >l000 feet west, is substantially developed, generally sloping eastward at o- 20%. • The forested bluff is dominated by a mixed -aged mature stand of Douglas -fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), with associated western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla), bigleaf maple (Acer macrophyllum), red alder (Alnus rubra) and bitter cherry (Prunus emerginata). Page 14 of 25 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. I !N�ninsulaeg.com I (36o) 504-3825 og-of-2oig Kala Point 203.9 Bluff Tree Actions — Habitat Management Plan i • Existing canopy over the project area is between 7o and 8o%. This percent includes diverse canopies of multiple strata, and some areas of homogeneous single strata plant communities. • Generally, forest density, heterogeneity, forest pathology, mature conifer presence and natural regeneration are common for North Pacific Coastal Cliff and Bluff communities. ■ The understory is variable; limited some areas of dense stems contained no significant understory vegetation. Most of the forested bluff contained dense thickets of salal (Gaultheria shallon), oceanspray (Holodiscus discolor) and sword fern (Polysitchum munitum) in the understory. • The tree canopy is relatively diverse with eleven different species observed in the upper canopy, including a large western red cedar (Thuja plicata), and many observed as natural regeneration in the understory. The most abundant young regenerative species were Douglas -fir, western redcedar, pacific madrone, followed by western hemlock. Mature Red alder (Alnus rubra) and Scouler's willow (Salix scouleriana), bigleaf maple (Ater macrophyllum) and Pacific madrona (Arbutus menziesit) were common. Bitter cherry (Prunus emarginata), shorepine (Pinus contorta var. contorta) and white pine (Pinus monticola) were rare. • A total of 41 species were observed during our site investigation. There are certainly many more species not seen or present in areas not visited. Most of the species observed in the forest were native species with only 1 exotic species of concern, Scotch broom (Cystisus scoparius). 4.3.1 Observed Plant Communities Species Common Name Origin Abundance Trees Abies grandis grand fir Native Rare Woody plants >35 Acer macrophyllum Bigleaf maple Native Uncommon ft Alnus rubra Red alder Native Common Arbutus menziesii Pacific madrona Native Abundant Pinus contorta var. contorta Shorepine Native Rare Pinus monticola Western white pine Native Rare Prunus emarginata Bitter cherry Native Abundant Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas -fir Native Abundant Salixscouleriana Scouler'swillow Native Common Thuja plicata Western red cedar Native Common Tsuga heterophylla Western hemlock Native Common Shrubs Arceuthobium tsugense hemlock dwarf Native Rare mistletoe Small trees <35 ft Amelanchier alnifolia Service berry Native Uncommon and woody shrubs Cytisus scoparius Scotch broom Exotic Uncommon of all sizes Holodiscus discolor Oceanspray Native Abundant C, Linnaea borealis Twinberry Native Common Page 15 of 25 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. I www.peninsulaeg.coan I (36o) 504-3825 og-of-2o1g Kala Point 20ig Bluff Tree Actions — Habitat Management Plan Gaultheria shallon Salal Native Abundant Mahonia nervosa Dull Oregon -grape Native Common Rubus leucodermis blackcap raspberry Native Uncommon Rubus parviflorus thimbleberry Native Uncommon Rubus spectabilis salmonberry Native Uncommon Rubus ursinus Trailing blackberry Native Common Sambucus racemosa Red elderberry Native Uncommon Sorbus aucuparia European Mt. Ash Exotic Rare Spiraea douglasii Douglas spirea Native Uncommon Symphoricarpos albus snowberry Native Uncommon Vaccinium parviflorum Red huckleberry Native Common Vaccinium ovatum Evergreen huckleberry Native Common Herbaceous Chamaenerion angustifolium fireweed Native Uncommon Herbaceous Galium aparine common bedstraw Native Uncommon vegetation are Geranium robertianum herb Robert Exotic Uncommon non -woody plants Holcus lanatus velvet grass Exotic Uncommon and include Leucanthemum vulgare oxeye daisy Exotic Rare grasses, ferns and (orbs (herbaceous Osmorhiza berteroi mountain sweet cicely Native Uncommon flowering plants Polystichum munitum sword fern Native Abundant that are not Pteridum aquilinum bracken -fern Native Uncommon grasses). Vicia nigricans giant vetch Native Uncommon 4.4 Project Action Area Trees actions are located along the Kala Point coastal high bluffs and adjacent properties. The following parcels have at least one tree action requested: 965000372, 96470oo83., 964700082, 965000023, 965000022, 96500002o, 96470oo56, and 964700055. The specific locations of tree actions can be seen tin Figures z - 7. The parcels are owned by Kala Point er&Assoc4t4oaancdl Kala Point residents, with ques coming rom six property owners looking to maintain their viewshed equested actions are primarily on or near e u c ri y arm ivi ua trees. One request specifies an area in which trimming is proposed for shrubs and immature, deciduous trees. Page 16 of 25 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. I www.peninsulaeg.coni I (36o) 504-3825 og-of-2o1g Kala Point 201.9 Bluff Tree Actions — Habitat Management Plan 5.i Listed Species, Critical and Priority Habitats A species and habitat list for the project site was compiled from United States Department of Fish & Wildlife (USFWS), the Washington State Department of Fish & Wildlife (WDFW), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and National Marine Fisheries (NMF). Data forthis project was accessed maps were accessed on the appropriate websites on in August 2019. This list is compiled below in Table 2. According to the USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaQ database, there are no Critical Habitats found within the project area, however, the potential occurrence of Endangered Species and their Critical Habitats will still be discussed in this section. No occurrences of terrestrial Driority habitats or species near the project area were found, and as such are not mentioned through the remainder of the report. - Table 2. Occurrence of listed species and critical habitats near project area. Species State Federal Associated Status Status Habitat Dungeness Crab None None Open water Pacific Herring Candidate None Open water/ intertidal beaches Priority Habitats Estuarine and Marine WDFW N/A N/A Wetland 5.2 Species Descriptions and Their Associated Habitat Critical Habitat in Project Vicinity? NO NO NO Project actions provided above are "not likely to affect" the listed species and habitat below. Pacific Herring Pacific herring (Clupea pallash) are one of several forage fish species found throughout the Puget Sound, Strait of Juan de Fuca, and Pacific Ocean nearshore environments. Other species of significance include Surf smelt (Hypomesus pretiosus), Pacific Sand Lance (Ammodytes hexapterus), and Pacific Eulachon (Thaleichthys pacificus). Forage fish are a valuable component to the marine ecosystem food web, and a listed keystone species in Washington state. They are a food source for a variety of marine life, including salmon, seabirds, and killer whales. Herring spawn throughout the Puget Sound region from January through mid -June, depositing eggs on marine vegetation found within the intertidal and shallow subtidal zones. While other forage fish rely on proper beach conditions for spawning (i.e. shade from overhanging vegetation, correct sediment size, and adequate tidal inundation), herring are more restricted to adequate vegetation within the marine intertidal zones. Eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) is of particular importance forthis species. Page 17 of 25 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. I www.peninsuiaecgxonl I (36o) 504-3825 og-o1-2019 Kala Point 2o19 Bluff Tree Actions — Habitat Management Plan 0 Dungeness Crab Dungeness crab (Cancermagister) are a valuable species with regards to the commercial fisheries of Washington State. They are frequently associated with dense eelgrass beds and estuaries with sandy or muddy substrates. Although neither state nor federally listed, the presence of this species near the project zone indicates that changes to the substrate within the nearshore environment could upset the revenue generated from harvesting of Dungeness crab. 6.1 Effects on Listed Species and Critical Habitats The propos tion modifications within the action area will create no net loss of priority habitat ecological functi r the above -mentioned species. Although some of the trees are within the designate s oreline buffer, they are not directly influencin the habitat of either species. The concern for impacts to aquatic species and news .ore wetlands would e t roug increased �p r sedimentation as a result of increased runoff in the areas of vegetation removal, Actions that would have resulted in a complete lack of canopy or bare qround will be miti ated for to prevent increase erosion, and proposed remova s were assessed by a geotechnicaI consultant and approved only if t ere wou d'}5e )r no change to slope stability. Requested actions were denied or adjusted when they were deemed too impactful. Continued modification of the shoreline vegetation, however, could have an indirect long-term impact on the nearshore environment, and as such should be limited overtime. Increased runoff, soil erosion, and decreased slope stabilization are a few of the long-term implications that could result. These long- term, cumulative effects can be mitigated for with proper best management practices for tree work, as well as following the mitigation recommendations specified in the accompanying Peninsula Environmental Group arborist report 09-09-2019 "Shoreline Tree Pruning Request". P a g e 18 of 25 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. I www.peninsuiaeg.com I (36o) 5o4-38z5 09-os-2019 Kala Point 2019 Bluff Tree Actions — Habitat Management Plan Q/17 Mitigation Recommendations All tree and vegetation modifications to be made have been reviewed by a Board -Certified Master Arborist, wildlife biologist, and horticulturalist with the Consultant and a Geological Engineer with En�irop tal. If the proposed a io s a �r4. tll� r�COmmendations provided in this, and Hying repo ,the integrity of the bluff and nearshore habitat will— rin �ntac f�lease refer to thee eniinsula Environmental Group arborist report 09-09-2019 "Shoreline Tree Pruning Request" for a full description of the work to be performed and professional recommendations. It should be noted that while no terrestrial species or habitats were listed, there are some large dead snags were near the project area. These snags have the potential to be used by Bald Eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and other large birds of prey for roosting and nesting - It is recommended that as man y,�c of these snags be retained as high as possible to provide adequate habitat for the above -mentioned d LAN. bird species. All planned removals should be left as habitat snags in the same accord. ��f�vrx�.►C� ,i��►�41 alb 5 • Correct and timely implementation of the project recommendations and mitigation will result in a no -net -loss of ecological function and reduction of cumulative impacts on shoreline processes. • ny trees�lanted asiffoundclea art of mitigation for shoreline impacts should be monitored for survival �fannually and replace . Debris from tree modifications should be scattered on the slope in place, where slope stability allows it. All removals should be left as habitat snags as high as possible, while not impeding views. • Tree specific requests and recommendations are in Appendix A and shall be followed as a condition of permitting the requested actions. Page 19 of 25 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. I www.peninsulaeg.corn I (36o) 504-3825 09-o1-2oig Kala Point zoig Bluff Tree Actions— Habitat Management Plan *- I Work for this project was performed and this report prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional practices for the nature and conditions of work completed in the same or similar localities, at the time the work was performed. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Neither myself, nor Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc., has any current or prospective interest in the plants or properties discussed. Acceptance ofthis report acknowledges receiptand agreementwith Peninsula Environmental Groups, Inc. attached Assumptions & Limiting Conditions. 9.1. Consultant Qualifications Justin Vendettuoli is a wetland scientist with Peninsula Environmental Group/Peninsula Urban Forestry/PEG, providing consulting on projects through Western Washington. Justin obtained a Bachelor of Science in Wildlife and Conservation Biology from the University of Rhode Island, and furthered his education through the Wetland Science and Management program at the University of Washington. His experience includes wetland delineations and ratings, mitigation plans, ecological assessments, critical area assessments, and integrated pest management. Justin Vendettuoli, WPIT I Senior Biologist I Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. John Bornsworth is the founder and senior environmental planner of Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. John is a Board -Certified Master Arborist, Municipal Arborist, pending his Registered Consulting Arborist and Tree Risk Assessment Qualified individual, with over 16 years of natural resource management experience. John specializes in natural resource evaluation and community resource planning from within urban and wildland forests, nearshore, critical area environments. John Bornsworth I Senior Urban Forester & Ecologist I Board Certified Master Arborist Page 1 10 of 25 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. I www.peninsulaeg.co n I (36o) 504-3825 og-of-2oig Kala Point 203.9 Bluff Tree Actions — Habitat Management Plan 1. Any legal description provided to Consultant is assumed to be correct. Any titles and ownerships to any property are assumed to be good and marketable. Consultant assumes no responsibly for verification of ownership or locations of property lines, or for results of any actions or recommendations based on inaccurate information. It is assumed that any property is not in violation of any applicable codes, ordinances, statutes or other governmental regulations, unless explicitly stated otherwise. 2. Consultant assumes no responsibilities for legal matters in character. Consultant assumes all property appraised or evaluated is free and clear and is under responsible ownership and competent management. 3. Any evaluation or assessment carried out was restricted to the property and the plants or landscapes within the Scope of Assignment. No assessment of any other plants or landscapes has been undertaken by Consultant. The conclusions of this report do not apply to any zones, landscapes, trees, plants, or any other property not explicitly covered in the Scope of Assignment. 4. The total monetary amount of all claims or causes of action the Client may have as against Consultant, including but not limited to claims for negligence, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of contract, shall be strictly limited to solely the total amount of fees paid by the Client to Consultant pursuant to the Agreement for Services as dated for which this Assignment was carried out. Further, under no circumstance may any claims be initiated or commenced by the Client against Consultant. or any of its directors, officers, employees, contractors, agents, orAssessors, in contract or in tort, more than 12 months after the date of this Assignment. 5. Although Consultant hastaken care to obtain all information from reliable sources and to verifythe data insofar as possible, Consultant does not guarantee and is not responsible forthe accuracy of information provided by others 6. Consultant shall not be required to testify or attend court due to any report unless mutually satisfactory contractual arrangements are made, including payment of an additional fee for such Services as described in a Consulting Arborist Agreement. 7. Unless otherwise required by law, possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply right of publication or use for any purpose by any other than the parties to whom it is addressed, without the prior expressed written or verbal consent of the Consultant. 8. Neither all or any part of the contents of this report, nor copy thereof, shall be conveyed to anyone, including the client, to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales or other media, without prior expressed written consent of Consultant. Particularly as to value conclusions, identify of Consultant., or any reference to any professional society or to any initialed designation conferred upon Consultant as stated in its qualifications. g. This report and any values expressed herein represent the opinion of the Consultant, and the Consultant's fee is in no way contingent upon the reporting of a specific value, a stipulated result, the occurrence of a subsequent event or upon any finding to be reported. 1o. All photographs included in this report were taken by Consultant during the documented site visit, unless otherwise noted. ii. Sketches, drawings and photographs in this report, being intended as visual aids, are not necessarily to scale and should not be construed as engineering or architectural reports or surveys. The reproduction of any information generated by architects, engineers or other Consultants and any sketches, drawings or photographs is for the express purpose of coordination and ease of reference only. Inclusion of such information on any drawings or other documents does not constitute a representation by Consultant as to the sufficiency or accuracy of the information. 12. Unless otherwise agreed, (i) information contained in this report covers only the items examined and reflects the condition of those items at the time of inspection; and (2) the inspection is limited to visual examination of accessible items without dissection, excavation, probing, climbing, or coring. Consultant makes no warranty or guarantee, express or implied, that the problems or deficiencies of the plans or property in question may not arise in the future. 13. This report is based on the condition of the trees, landscape, or plants at the time of inspection. 14. Loss or alteration of any part of this report invalidates the entire report. This report is only valid if reproduced from a digital fi le. Page 1 11 of25 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. I www.pen insulae-g,con i I (36o) 504-3825 og-of-2o1g Kala Point *w 2oig Bluff Tree Actions — Habitat Management Plan Figure s. The overall location of the requested tree actions. Requests are for Kala Point's central marine bluff. The ext nt ❑ a a o1ommunjty is s awn with a blue outline. Legend Roads 0 Tree Requests Vegetation Request 0 62.5125 250 375 500 Feet Scale 1:3,500 Page 1 12 of 25 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. I www.peninsulaefg,.corn I (36o) 504-3825 og-of-2o1g Kala Point 2osg Bluff Tree Actions — Habitat Ma Figure 2. Tree requests for cas C1.g-n Legend Jefferson Parcels [7' Tree Request Shoreline Jurisdiction Aquatic Natural Plan shown in Appendix A. 0 12.525 50 75 100 Feet Scale 1:700 Page 113 of 25 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. I www.peiiinsulaeg.com I (36o) 504-3825 og-of-2oig Kala Point 2o3.9 Bluff Tree Actions — Habitat Management Plan Figure 3. Tree requests for cas ' -z, s shown in Appendix A. Legend 0 Jefferson Parcels ir) Tree Requests Shoreline Jurisdiction Aquatic Vegetation Request Natural 0 12.525 50 75 100 Feet Scale 1:700 Page 114 of 25 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. I www.peninsulaeg.corn I (36o) 504-3825 og-of-2oig Kala Point 20ig Bluff Tree Actions — Ha Figure 4. Tree requests for ci Management Plan Legend = Jefferson Parcels Tree Request Shoreline Jurisdiction Aquatic Natural _ Page 15 of25 shown in Appendix A. 0 12.525 50 75 100 Feet ■ Scale 1:700 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. www.peninsulaeg.cow I (36o) 504-3825 og-of-2oig Kala Point WK - 20ig Bluff Tree Actions — Habitat Management Plan Figure 5. Tree requests for cas Cz0-4,ashownin Appendix A. Legend = Jefferson Parcels Shoreline Jurisdiction AD Tree Request Aquatic Natural 0 12.525 50 75 100 Feet `■ Scale 1:700 Page 1 16 of 25 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. I www.peninsulaeg.com I (36o) 504-3825 og-o1-2019 Kala Point aoig Bluff Tree Actions — Habitat Management Plan Figure 6. Tree requests for cal` �shown in Appendix A. Legend = Jefferson Parcels — Roads Shoreline Jurisdiction Aquatic r Tree Request -01 Natural Page 1 17 of25 0 10 20 40 60 80 Feet Scale 1:600 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. I www,peninsulaeg.com (36o) 504-3825 og-os-2o1g Kala Point 2osg Bluff Tree Actions — H a b Figure 7. Tree requests for Legend Jefferson Parcels — Roads Shoreline Jurisdiction Aquatic Natural Page 118 of25 anagement Plan C_') Tree Request shown in Appendix A. 0 10 20 40 60 8■ 70 u Feet ■ Scale 1:600 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. I WWWLpeninsulaeg.coni I (36o) 504-3825 og-of-2o1g Kala Point *` 2o19 Bluff Tree Actions — Habitat Management Plan Alaska Department of Fish and Game. "Short -tailed Albatross, Species Profile." http://www.adfg.alaska.gov/index.cfm?adfg=shorttailedaIbatross.main Dalton, M.M., P.W. Mote, and A.K. Snover [Eds.]. 2013. Climate Change in the Northwest: Implications for Our Landscapes, Waters, and Communities. Washington, DC: Island Press. Federal Emergency Management Agency. "FEMA Flood Map Service Center." https://msc.fema.gov/portal/home Jefferson County. 201ga. Jefferson County Code. Code Publishing Company. Seattle, Washington. https://www.codepublishing.com/WA/JeffersonCounty Jefferson County. 2o1gb. Critical Area and Parcel Map. Jefferson County https://jeffcowa.maps.arcgis.com/home/index.htmi Johnson, David H., and Thomas A. O'Neil. Wildlife -Habitat Relationships in Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press, zoos LANDFIRE. 2014. United State Department of Agriculture Forest Service and The Department of Interior. littps://www.landfire..govJindex-ph ) (accessed 25 June 2019). National Resource Conservation Service 2029. Online Web Soil Survey. http://websoilsurvey.nres.usa.gov NOAA Fisheries West Coast Region. "CHART Assessment forthe Hood Canal Summer -run Chum Salmon ESU." https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/publications/protected_species/salmon_steelhead/c ritical_habitat/chart_report/2oo5_chart_hc_chum.pdf NOAA Fisheries West Coast Region. "CHART Assessment for the Puget Sound Chinook Salmon ESU." https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/publications/protected_species/salmon_steelhead/c ritical_habitat/chart_report/20o5_chart_ps_chi nook. pdf NOAA Fisheries West Coast Region. "Endangered Species Act Critical Habitat." www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/maps_data/endangered_species_act_critical_habitat.htmi NOAA Fisheries West Coast Region. "Southern Resident Killer Whales." https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/protected_species/marine_mammals/killer_Whale/cr itical habitat.html Priority Habitats and Species List. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. WDFW Habitat Program. Olympia, WA. 2008. Print. Rocchio J.F. and R.C. Crawford [Eds]. 2015. Ecological Systems of Washington State: A Guide to Identification. Washington Natural Heritage Program, Washington State Department of Natural Resources. Report 2015-04. U.S. Department of Agriculture. "Web Soil Survey." Natural Resources Conservation Service, https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm?TARGET_APP=Web_Soil_Survey _application joogsrgfm02oac3slaigr4hp Page 119 of 25 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc. I www.pe(iinsulaeg.com I (36o) 504-3825 og-of-2019 Kala Point 2oig Bluff Tree Actions — Habitat Management Plan U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. "Explore Location, Information for Planning and Consultation." Environmental Conservation Online System, https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/location/CXG36VXOVNB6PL37P7CWDWBBDM/resources U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. "Marbled Murrelet." Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office, https://www.fws.gov/arcata/es/birds/mm/m_murrelet.htmI U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. "Species Fact Sheet, Golden Paintbrush, Castilleja levisecta." https://www.fws.gov/wafwo/species/Fact%2osheets/GPaintbrush—factsheet.pdf U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. "Species Profile for Bull Trout." Environmental Conservation Online System, https://ecos.fws.gov/ecpo/profile/speciesProfile?sld=8212 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. "Streaked Horned Lark." Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office, https://www.fws.gov/oregonfwo/articles.cfm?id=:L49489450 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. "Taylor's checkerspot butterfly." Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office, https://www.fws.gov/oregonfwo/articies,cfm?id=149489449 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. "Yellow -billed cuckoo (Western population)." Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office, littRs://www.fws.govioregonfwpiarticles.cl;m?icl=a.494895:t Page 120 of 25 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc www.peninsula'eg.corr? I (360) 504-3825 0 NO 09-o1.-aod9 W Kale Point zoag Bluff Tree Actions — Habitat Management Plan L'71 L18T4 REl7LESTM TREE ACIWNS 191l cENFRAL SECTOII �M Bs1eE ftm R sc Requeser& Casel BMA C Requested Reor min dallons Menagerie). Maws Tree Number Tree Type Action Objective (GeoRdr; see report Ior YYp11RN B1oPoplN RacammaMaOanf Arborlst Reormmendetions Sch relder iH,Tltus C19-1 #1 Douglas Fir, 50' Skirtup Restore waterwew Pmne lowest ONE branch whirl Do not prune ore Man lower (Winfrey) whirl. Do not reduce tee's livecrowntatio to below 50% 17 trees C19-1 #2 eagles Fr, 4D S4 1M/I[i1yC5ee] a 1ptl Polen0a1 babTtdtbee as"1" a mu -slammed Fraudmr l Fraud morn leader at o16 nabreakage point Empl, flat tap from an old breaker topping Tree wide, flat branches beneath topped area Retain topping height previously topped naturally or mechanically, overtime Tree naturally topped; re -heading will not reduce tree Emphasizing flat uppercrown will increase hehikdr,—, lirespen CT -1 6ou9las Fr, 5Dsb Skirt up Rellamwaff Yfaw- ---- No Milan- Too 11N! .1a1ltwty nertputln¢ cycle C19-1#4 Douglas Fir, 50-60' Skirt up Restore water view. Prone lowest TWO branch whorls. Do not md— bras'slive- n-ratio to below 50% C19-1 A5 Douglas Fir, 57 Sklrtup R"fore vow fidew, Pmnelowesl7V0Obranchwhorls Donotreducetrce,aTwe- crown-redo to below 50% C19-1 AS Western Red Cedar, SP Skirt up R,gipw�redNrvlerr- lee is a*"kmfNdCuete, >s0NLMN 10 Follow window pinning specifications to improve view Window Douglas -fir ldentifiedonollpHJ�i)MRCLY. pinning should be limited to 20%living canopy C7g-1#7 Douglas Fir, 50' Wndow on N, side Restore water view. No melim. TW lBfl h�rfso.-41" lgtia laic Who until nekt pmoing cycle C7&1#8 Douglas Fa, 50' Trlm fgwel wericteri. Awwowttllrlsew. Reduce brarrrh lar,"'(end-weight-moodon) on lowestTWO N side or THREE branches on north side C19-1 #9 Medrena, 40' Remove L (N) Fork, Restore water view. Will Cannot remove fork. Tree will die, Pmna no more Man 15% Pow mom than MmlowerRfb)side video sabetaatiel vdllik habitat -. ➢t«tse�Reee ne, no WYI C19-1 1111 Madrona, 50' ".move Remove lower Restore water view. ftsmer! k-i MarNyies 4IrO m in dorm&W. lom. na rebto branches (S) side than 75%living canopy Remove any deed -wood present Diwdwdod lauhataNl� wikisa hebrii FeWrywi dowpep6lyl aa. and rtcwmogIQ D19-11FT7 Douglas Fr -Thin (selective mm) Restore water view. photograph supplied Preferably remove from only one side or tree Remove no more than 20%living canopy- C19-1#12-#11 Douglas Fir, 7 trees Skirt up or thin Restamwaterview, TM,, M 1414, Ilii 1d-RW 400ent Ww-b wbods#) (12A & 12B) (selective him), added irtpava view 01 Water- Do not remove more Man 15%living after original fiilMps Do not reduce tree's livecmvm ratio below 60% submission J Pagel21of25 Peninsula Environmental Group, InaI www.oennsulaeg.c_ I(360) SO4-3825 og-oi-gong Kale Point 2019 Bluff Tree Actions— Habitat Manaaement Plan V T1MmoirpsonbR Gerard (Winfrey), G19-2#1 Pacific Yew, 15k Retop, trim branches <T' diameter Restoreview of Pr, ltiaea -AW erhdpy tp'ww F" drWyK 12 trees (4 mmovals) C19-2#2 Douglas Fir, B"diem, 30 Removelff FGMQ #uot PZ A* be h dprpRpdadJMfygt hrNmra, Mitigate per supplied Restoration Specifications. ft Geotech Report C192 Red COMM 44 Lewin 03 and R4, do R dm Am MlW; 2ramovals No avallable pruning an ens a me Waitunbl next pruning cycle diem, 40 It selective trimming far Baker disallowed by to per(mm window pruning ew. Geotech Report climbed bo binunin C%-2157 Wasem Red Cedars, W Remove#5, W, 97. Restore view oiML 3fateevoloallowetl Need mmgaeon iormebaegroundmatexlsta Mlfplla par wi Thild ReaeareHytrBpetlfedpre, diem, 30 R clump of 3. Baker brciael"li Report under canopy. No observed protected habitat Discovered when FeaWres Inspected, added to this ver,ian C19-2#8 Douglas Fir, u'diam, WMndowce 10 Rwlo all FDOWN gndpr pnmft spKtk&IWM Do not remove more than 120 It branches told. Or*b W MHHW. 20%living foliage From canopy Cf92 no DouglasF1r, 20" diem, Wndowc812 G"m vlewM Follow window pruning specihcabons Do not remove more than 120ft branches Wit 40'above MHHW. 20% living foliage from canopy. CT92#1 Douglas -Fir. 1B'diam, pup, prev elert4d Rey'afe rl#Nd Prune lowerbrancn'wnods Prune no more than 20%living 140 It up Idd. 40'ameve YWIW( canopy Remove any dead —el present Do not reduce tree's livearownistio below 50% Cl9�2#11 Satal,O-ansmay. Tdm shnhs to 3T Sustaln water view Continue coppicing small deciduous trees and hedging shrubs. decltluous trees, height Trim has cross lot Himalayan BB branches <3" diem, eliminsle BS _ Prrmnbrrrch whale&feet upwrrda hetn wrrent crown Dose C79-2 S72 Wesem load Ceder Sprt up R*%Wq Maw'Winr#in Isld Prune ng more than 20%Ihirg canopy Remove any deatl- ood prawn[ Do not reduce tree', tiVecrownretio below 50% I� P a g e 122 of 25 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc.I w ,pm nnf%&-Aj. m I (360)504-3825 C I t -- 3 og-oa-201g Kale Point zoag Bluff Tree Actions —Habitat Management Plan V Dybeck 03, C1&3#1 West Red Cedar, 16r Shin up RMomnow of Ann Prune trench whods to achieve view of water horizon Prune no Winfrey, dam, 70 ft Townsend more than 20%living canopy. Remove any deed -wood present T trees 16 removab) fterkre wow new Do not reduce tree', IN —ratio below 50% C19-3 # 2 Madrona, 1T slam , 40' RemoVe dead tree R4mowlt IPI4WOd by Unhealthy, not heti . t, mitigate .= Allrg ern#g6ee�. Geotech Report C793#3 ougles F1f, 74'®am, 60 Remove §j_s_Wew4mrWm Gd9rmv/pywsd ey Unhealthy, not habi t M. eruippiednpecnc."wei. ReportIf C19-364 Douglas Flr, 1C diem, BD leave, instead do t[OMM-10-VWWI NkTwesia d-alleired Prime UMITED branch whorls above slope —tend below R selective pruning to by 0-tech Report, shoreline horizon to gradually improve view of—ler hari on open up vimchanged to trimming Prune no more than 10%living canopy aschown through the supplied photo Remove any dead -wood present rrviwrnw rthe bwe gmuld dlsr 4pdrgl Wrgw supplied specdicabdns. 61B-3 #5 Western Red ceder, 16"- Rem vom a Regpn lvwrrlsw. Rm�dvr•elkwedlry diem, 50 R Right of#4. Geet ich Report unortl;y Worse ulielon y of C19-3 #6 Western Red Ceder, 16" Remove _ Restore watervlew RW—W rlWwd hl - f4a gap Bro Ana grcuM row mms MlbgNo rsupp➢ed specihcavons diem , 60 R Behind #7 Geotech Report ;Z- rend} wane understory o1 Help rmi t•.wr rWd • harnnrn tl thW cuss `9+ 61"#7 Western Red Cedar, 16' Remove Rirkwe Water VreW In R/mwM f kYpPfed ep4alN:eiein. diem, 50 R lfen[ knd ei At, #5. rFpM Geolech Ra rt Report undm —illy epmuerouunderstery of ClefMtdheene. sfuvl_f�py_�yspyef. Page 123 of 25 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc, I n6+y.ge^!I %Jr fig c" I (36o) 504-3825 og-of-aoig Kala Point ao Bluff Tree Actions— Habitat Mananement Plan Gooding 44, love, C19-4[#I] Vewiine ettop of 19—or. a Resmre water view Ignore, note tree. MIA NIA 9 trees Whidbey Island below this line CT94 92 Douglas Fa, ra08 menus Slan up lower(<7) Reetaewetel vim— , Prune to maintain existing canopy height any Do notremove branches PartTownsend additional branches over 3inches Clean trunk to remove new growth Do not remove mare than 10%e'Mg [afege. Do not retMce Bede IlwMwewfFleGo aplew WSF. C194d3 Western Red eedar, ta118 Previously skirted, ROetor4 welNhdewof Pmne lowestTNO branch whods Clean trunkto remove new mature r owed new growth PortTownsend growth Do not remove more than 10%living foliage Do not (restart) reduce tree's livacrown-ratio below 60%. CT94 44 VVesrem Red Cedar, Will 8 P-AKrhIywlndeead. ReeyereYale Melt Of Pmne lowest TWO branchwhorls Clean trunk to remove new mature remove new growth Part Townsend Bay growth growDo not remove more than 10%living foliage Do not and expand window B It up Mc down Previously started, —9ft oW*ww—rliwd reduce tree's livacrown-mllo below BD% Pmne lowest FOUR hrench whods Clean trunkto remove new ClTi'*S Western Red Cedar, tall 8 mature removed new growth Part Townsend and growth Do not remove more than 10%living foliage Do not and skirt up four Whidbey Island reduce omnivecrown-rato below 60% whods C194#6 Douglai TO mature Previously sldned, RtrAolaw" vfery of* Prune to maintain existing canopy height Clean trunk to moved new growth Baker. remove new growth Do notremove more than 10%living and start up four foliage Do not reduce tree's livecrown+atio below 60% whods C19-4#7 PadficYew Selective trimming, Open up to get original Tree s i sew mmend ha 'bt[ �eowhireloreco 9 xlwtq eonweref4n . iee bush -like shape now. viewof Port Townsend Wlqelle Rftbdwrgn BP erWVJtudhe C1 dAB Herrrlosir. tat 6 mmwn Previously skirted, R"Unwauv4wdln Prune lowest TWO branch who nk to remove new removed new growth Baker growth Do not remove more than 10%living foliage Do not and skirt up four reduce tree's livecvawn-ratio below 60% whods C19-4R9 Hemlock rY6 Previously skirted, start Reelale wmet hehed YL Prune lowest ONE branch whods Clean trunkto remove new up 3d whods On Baker growth Do not remove more than 10%living foliage Do not Gerard's lot (p55) reduce tree's livecrowri below 60% Prune and -weight of branches In viewshed area This wall 1-194 IM Heniosir, bill noilli a Previously started, skirt Reelefaw(iatar Air al ktL Shown cn C79-5 up not to exceed 60140 Baker photograph awing m relieve foliage load and reduce branch drooping into viewshed bola/crown ratio, ew angle Clean trunk to remove new growth Do not remove more than 10%living foliage Do nut reduce tree's livecrawn-ratio below 50% NOTE: Removal of any new branch whods will cause tree to became unstable I i Page 124 of25 Peninsula Environmental Group, Incwww.oeenlnsPlaeg tom I(36o) 504-3B25 C / q - -5-- C(-T -k .9-d.-zp.9 Kale Point loop WuffTrpe Actions—Hahilat Morlaciemerit Plan V Genre #S, Love, C793171� _ Westem Red Cedar Retap and selective On crest of bluff, sustain ,.� barRi .delnnaq —'Head man teeneretold inmost breakage point Empnesae 6 trees trimming for view water view Previously EIH an okenakor inn wide, flat branches beneath toppetl area Retain tapping height tapped, on ledge. paeHeualr I c��urrlup� r.dca%. over time. Tree nahnally topped; m- heading will not reduce tree tl� E"01,1 enp --iric lfrarean _ neS�On �`iric Ilfespan C795 rYt Modrme Shin up re ower On nest otbluff, sustain Remove lower bromMes <3mches m diameter. Prune no more branches <3"ove waterview than 15%living canopy- Remove any deed -woad present Do diameter) not reduce tree's livecrown-ratio below 50% Cl95 #3 Western Red Cedar VP by al -I n0 On ledge of bluff, sustain Prune lowest ONE or TWO branch wh.ds 1...li-. improved regrowth (two clusters) water view w. Clean trunk to remove new growth Do not remove more van l0% living foliage Do not redu , trea s live—n-ratio below 60% C19-5#4 Lwyaa Fa 60110 aanrplllNq kr On ledge oibl.R, pistol Footle Wo wA a9d wndsrrp""a PW—_—zWW—Wl—M to open up view bug trunk Sustain water down to achieve improved view Clean bunk W remove new vlew. growth Do not remove more than 10%5,40 kllaga Donor rrhaa.a aaas Mme.ahnraa4 bdbNM% C19-5 #5 Hemlock Skirt up (remove 6 R of On top of bluff, sustain Prune lowest TWO or THREE branch whods- Clean trunk to lower branches) water view. RrhWvatar,w grewq. Lop.felaew mere than lO%kvkq foliage. Ld rot tattle RaaSl ova-ervttlfNo hakna a0t4 C19-5 Douglas Fr Skin up (remove 6R of On top of bluff.. in Prune lowest ONE toTM branch whorls Clean bunk to lowerbmnches) water view remove new growth Do not remove mare than 10%living foliage Do not reduce bees livecrownraflo below 60% Marshall #6, C7ec9L#1 'YYaldam Rod Skirt Skirtup ID sfrdrihhvabrvlaw, 0. Prune lowest 114 at trees. bmnch o#s Do noT remove more Kub, 3 trees bunks 14"diem edge of bluff, one of two than an 20% Irving foliage Do not reduce tree'.I—mwnmb. removal) bunks previously below 50% removed C79$7I Douglas Fir, W diem, 40 Sl.n up nvo woods $V4labhwvW--`—'a'. On PrlKle icwaal 114 o14aoY til-Id Whonk De nd nnlore *019 it steep bluff, previously than 20% IivirgrkNape. Do not reduce tree's livecrown-ratio windowed f below 50% �. C19A #3 Douglas Fir, 20" diam , 120 ft Remove tree (Grouch report) Ramp"W61, wtoa view Previously tapped, Removal allowed by Geotech Report 1h11Y�aM lob Vas tarn 7.MpaiaerK pplled specifications. minimal foliage, on steep bluff. Note: 54 trees, includes 10 removals (bold) Page 1 25 of 25 Peninsula Environmental Group, Inc I q,.'=y.1211IM 741 .ST@r Ci6o) 504-3025