HomeMy WebLinkAbout18-33-R Rebecca TaylorJefferson County Board of Equalization
Board Clerk's Record of Hearing
Petition No: 18-33-R
Taxpayer's Name: Rebecca Taylor
Mailing Address: 460 Cleveland Street
City: Port Hadlock State: WA Zip Code: 98339
Taxpayer's Parcel No: 962 700 081
Hearing Was Held On: June 5, 2019
Board Members Present: Dave Garing, Henry Krist
Decision of Board:
Value Sustained:
Value Changed From
Other:
Recorded on Tape No:
Hearing Bogan at (time)
rpersbn (or
$532,660.00 To: $365,405.00
BOE 060519
11:13 a.m.
Ended at (time): 11:47 a.m.
� �,
Date
To ask about the availability of this publication in an alternate format for the visually impaired, please call (360) 705-6715.
Teletype (TTI) users, please call (360) 705-6718. For tax assistance, call (360) 534-1400.
REV 60 0002e (w) (2/9/12)
Property Owner:
Parcel Number(s):
ORDER OF THE JEFFERSON COUNTY
BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
Rebecca Taylor
962 700 081
Assessment Year: 2018
Date(s) of Hearing 6/5/2019
Case Number: BOE 18-33-R
Having considered the evidence presented by the parties in this appeal, the board hereby F]Sustains Overrules
the determination of the Assessor.
Assessor's Determination
0 Land
Improvements
Timber/Minerals
F]Personal Property
Total
BOE Determination:
$204,016 FILand
$328,644 1] Improvements
Timber/Minerals
F]Personal Property
$532,660
This decision is based on our finding that:
Dated this 2.1-�day of August, 2019.
Dave Gari g, hairm
(See Attached)
NOTICE
Total $365,405
Ma'led:
Shannon, xecutive Assistant
his order can be appealed to the State Board of Tax Appeals by filing a notice of appeal with them at P.O. Box 40915,
lympia, WA 98504-0915, or at their website at bta.state.wa.us/appeal/forms.htm within thirty days of the date of
ailing of this order. The appeal forms are available from either your County Assessor or the State Board of Tax Appeals.
To ask about the availability of this publication in an alternate format for the visually impaired
call 1-800-647-7706. Teletype (TTY) users use the Washington Relay Service by calling 711.
Distribution: * Assessor * Petitioner * BOE File
FORM REV 64 0058 (5/25/2017)
ORDER OF THE JEFFERSON COUNTY
BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
Rebecca Taylor
Appeal No.: BOE 18-33-R
Parcel No.: Parcel # 962 700 081
Issue: Under appeal is the value of 112' of improved residential waterfront located on Port Hadlock's
Oak Bay. The appellant's petition estimates the value to be $432,660 ($129,016 for the land and
$303,644 for the improvements). The Assessor's valuation of the property as of January 1, 2018 is
$532,660 ($204,016 for the land and $328,644 for the improvements). The subject represents one of two
adjoining property appeals that the petitioner presented to the Board in concert. She contends the fair
market value of her property has been negatively impacted by the illegal non -conforming use of a
neighborhood property.
Appellant's Argument and Evidence: The Appellant presented evidence outlining an appraisal prepared
by a certified residential appraiser accompanied by a Detrimental Conditions Impact Summary, as well as
maps, photographs, and comparable property sales. The appellant testified the market value of her
property has been severely damaged by an adjacent illegal and unlicensed 24 hour towing and wrecking
yard. She asserts "Jefferson County has failed to assert or apply their own Codes of Practice" as a
neighbor dumped abandoned vehicles, derelict boats, and hazardous waste on his own and adjoining
properties. The operator of the wrecking yard has also been renting seven RVs as living accommodations
with sewage flushed directly onto the ground creating a potential environmental health hazard that
appears to be running off onto neighboring properties. The appellant states that during the rainy season
"toxic substances and human sewage create an iridescent sheen that runs almost the entire length of my
property". She also testified she has lost rental income, lost sleep due to the 24 hour operation of the
towing business, lost landscape plantings as a result of abandoned cars deposited on her property, and
lost peace of mind due to harassment and verbal threats which have driven her to obtain an anti -
harassment order.
She explained how her neighbor had employed a certified residential appraiser to determine how a
neighborhood wrecking yard can negatively affect neighborhood property values. No recent vacant land
sales near a wrecking yard or similar business were found in Jefferson County, however three properties
located near recycling facilities were identified in Clallam and Island County. Their sale prices were
paired with similarly sized properties not near recycling facilities in these counties. Parcel (a) described a
28% negative impact on sales price. Parcel (b) described a 34% negative impact on sales price. Parcel (c)
described a 30% negative impact on sales price. A fourth, parcel (d) compared a property in a
neighborhood of "substandard improvements" with a similarly sized parcel not located near these
conditions with a reported impact of 33% on the sales price. The appraiser calculated a mean impact of
-31.5%, and an average impact of -31.25%. The appraiser recommended the application of a negative
31.4% as an adjustment for arriving at a fair market valuation.
The appellant also found it notable that the offending property had been valued by the Assessor at
$67,335 as of 1-1-18 but sold in March 2019 for only $24,281 (representing a 64% reduction in value)
with a clause that if it is not cleaned up the sales price will be reduced to $10,000.
Assessor's Argument and Evidence: The Assessor's representative presented three sales he identified as
comparable to the subject, a tax parcel map showing the location of the comparable sales, a copy of the
appraisal worksheet for the subject with photographs, and the appraisal worksheets for the comparable
sales. Comparable sales were all improved waterfront parcels with acreage, and they ranged in price
from $229,900 to $925,000.
He did make a site visit to the subject but did not hear any noise while he was there, however he did
acknowledge the validity of more than 30 photographs of the neighborhood wrecking yard. He also
indicated that contiguity, proximity, and property access using a route past the junkyard were significant
factors in determining a reduction in value.
Summary and Conclusions: The Assessor's representative testified the property did warrant a reduction
and suggested 5% to 10% but presented no evidence to support the rationale for these particular
reductions. He also testified that he was thinking of a set dollar amount ($25,000) but then said, "It's hard
to set a number on something you don't know."
The residential appraiser employed by the appellant's neighbor used a methodical approach to valuing
property detrimentally impacted by proximity to a wrecking yard and included documentary evidence to
support her conclusions.
The Board has determined that a negative 31.4% adjustment should be applied to the Assessor's original
determination of true and fair market value.
Decision: The Board of Equalization overrules the Assessor's valuation and finds that a preponderance
of evidence supports a true and fair market value of $365,405. (no breakdown between the land and the
improvements were provided)