Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2281.01 Wilkins Draft Restoration ReportPrepared For: Tim Wilkins 10953 Madison Avenue Bainbridge Island, Washington 98110 (206)380-7345 Prepared By: Ecological Land Services, Inc. 1157 3rd Avenue, Suite 220A Longview, Washington 98632 (360) 578-1371 ELS Project 2281.01 December 2015 Draft Wetland and Buffer Restoration Plan for the Gybe Ho Road Property Jefferson County, Washington Gybe Ho Road Property Ecological Land Services, Inc. Draft Wetland and Buffer Restoration Plan December 2015 i SIGNATURES The information and data in this report was compiled and prepared by the undersigned: ____________________________ Joanne Bartlett, PWS Senior Biologist Gybe Ho Road Property Ecological Land Services, Inc. Draft Wetland and Buffer Restoration Plan December 2015 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .........................................................................................................1 SITE DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................................2 Wetlands ........................................................................................................................................2 ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS IN THE DISTURBED AREAS ..............................................3 RESTORATION APPROACH AND DESIGN .........................................................................4 Restoration Sequencing ................................................................................................................4 Restoration Strategy .....................................................................................................................4 Planting Plan .................................................................................................................................5 Plant Specifications .......................................................................................................................5 GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS...........................................6 Restoration Goal ...........................................................................................................................6 Objectives and Performance Standards .....................................................................................6 MONITORING PLAN .................................................................................................................7 Vegetation ......................................................................................................................................7 Monitoring Report Contents ........................................................................................................8 MAINTENANCE ..........................................................................................................................8 CONTINGENCY PLAN ..............................................................................................................8 LIMITATIONS .............................................................................................................................9 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................10 Figures Figure 1 Vicinity Map Figure 2 Restoration Plan Overview Figure 3 Wetland Restoration Map Figure 4 Buffer Planting Plan Gybe Ho Road Property Ecological Land Services, Inc. Draft Wetland and Buffer Restoration Plan December 2015 1 INTRODUCTION Ecological Land Services, Inc. (ELS)was contracted by Tim Wilkins to prepare this restoration plan for the Gybe Ho Road property in the Nordland area of Jefferson County, Washington.This property is comprised of parcel number 921092007 within Section 9, Township 29 North, and Range 1 East of the Willamette Meridian (Figure 1).The restoration plan is required to rectify disturbances to the onsite wetland per the violation order issued by the Washington Department of Ecology in June 2015 (Ecology). PROJECT DESCRIPTION The wetland on this property was impacted by clearing, grading, filling, and dredging during installation of a driveway onto the property in the spring of 2015.Development of the property was proposed and the driveway was constructed across the wetland to provide access into the interior of the property. The easement to the property lies at the west end but because there was an easily identified wetland at the west end and there was an existing road from the east,the driveway was constructed across the east end of the property. Portions of the site were cleared in preparation of the development including the depressional forested wetland tha t lies across the east half of the property. The driveway was constructed across the wetland and left an area of undisturbed forest to the north. A culvert was placed beneath the driveway to allow continued flow of water through the wetland area. The area of wetland immediately south of the driveway was cleared and dredged. The spoils were spread across cleared wetland east and west of the dredged area. Undisturbed wetland remains south of the cleared and dredged sections of wetland. Restoration of the wetland is proposed to restore the vegetation and function of the wetland that was disturbed during the onsite construction activities. The restoration will include removal of the driveway and the culvert. The gravel and fill material will be used to construct a new driveway into the property, which will be located outside of the on and offsite wetlands. Following removal of the driveway, the spoils will be placed back into the dredged and driveway sections of the disturbed wetland. A bulldozer will be used to place the spoils into the dredged area to the elevation of the undisturbed wetland areas north and south of the disturbance. Once the dredged area is filled in,woody mulch chipped from onsite logging piles will be spread across the graded wetland area. Large woody debris from the logging piles in the form of horizontal logs and root wads will be placed in the wetland. Following grading activities,the wetland and buffer areas will be planted with native trees and shrubs to restore the cleared forested vegetation (Figures 3 and 4). Emergent and herbaceous vegetation will not be planted because the seed sources remain within the dredge spoils and the original understory vegetation will recover naturally. Because the construction activities have resulted in at least three different impact categories, each area will require special restoration activities. The disturbed area of wetland was cleared in its entirety but not all of the wetland was dredged or filled.The multiple impacts have been identified and the areas of impact identified are summarized in Table 1. Gybe Ho Road Property Ecological Land Services, Inc. Draft Wetland and Buffer Restoration Plan December 2015 2 Table 1.Wetland Impact and Restoration Summary Impact Area Impact Type Impact Amount Proposed Restoration Wetland A Filling (Driveway & Spoils) 0.07 ac (2,962 sq. ft.) Remove driveway from the wetland and buffer prior to replacement of dredge spoils. Remove spoils from wetland and place into the dredged area. Wetland A Dredging 0.01 ac (613 sq. ft.) Replace dredge spoils from wetland outside the dredged channel. Place large woody debris (LWD) that remains in piles on the site within the restored wetland area. Spread woody material chipped from the onsite logging debris over the graded wetland area. Wetland A Clearing 0.12 ac (5,198 sq. ft.) Plant wetland following replacement of dredge spoils and removal of driveway. Plants will include shrubs and trees. Herbaceous understory expected to restore naturally due to seed sources in dredged soils. Wetland A Buffer Clearing 0.34 ac (14,882 sq.ft.) Replant native trees and shrubs in the cleared buffer areas. SITE DESCRIPTION The property is located at the end of Gybe Ho Road in the Nordland area of Jefferson County (Figure 1). Gybe Ho Road runs east of State Highway 116 just after it enters Marrowstone Island. The property is located at the north end of a gravel drive that leaves the end of Gybe Ho Road. It is rectangular in shape and is oriented east to west (Figure 1). The topography is undulating to flat with a shallow linear trough oriented north to south across the eas t end of the property. It is currently undeveloped but portions of the east half were recently cleared and a driveway was constructed about midway across the east half (Figure 2). Soil logs have been conducted by a septic system designer to prepare a septic system site plan for future development. A fence is proposed just inside the perimeter of the property (Figure 2). The fence and property lines have been staked around the entire property. Wetlands The delineated wetland is situated in the depressional trough across the east half of the property. A 0.12-acre portion of the onsite wetland has been disturbed by clearing,construction of the driveway, dredging of the south half of the wetland, and spread of dredge spoils. Undisturbed forested wetland remains north and south of the disturbed area and represents the historic condition of the disturbed wetland.The wetland begins just north of the disturbance and extends south to Gybe Ho Road where it often floods the roadway. A small pipe was installed across the road to facilitate drainage under the road and avoid flooding. There are depressional wetlands offsite to the east (Offsite Wetland A) and west (Offsite Wetland B). These wetlands extend just to the property line and do not continue onto th e property so do not connect to the onsite wetland. There may be some overland flow onto the property from the wetland to the east but there is no continuous wetland across the property line Gybe Ho Road Property Ecological Land Services, Inc. Draft Wetland and Buffer Restoration Plan December 2015 3 and into the onsite wetland. Although the wetlands do not extend onto the property, the buffers required from each will extend onto the east and west ends of the property. The onsite wetland was delineated in June 2015 in accordance with Jefferson County Code (JCC) Chapter 18.22, Article VI Wetland. The offsite wetlands were identified but not delineated. The Wetland Delineation Report for the Gybe Ho Property Nordland, Washington (ELS 2015) describes the 2015 methodology, collected data, and wetland categorization.Table 2 below summarizes the details of the on and offsite wetlands. Table 2. Wetland Summary Wetland Name Size Onsite Category HGM & Coward Classes Total Assessment Score/Habitat Score Land Use Intensity Buffer Width Onsite Wetland 0.12 acre (5,198 sq. ft.)III Depressional FO 18/6 Moderate 110 feet Offsite Wetland A N/A III Depressional FO 18/6 Moderate 110 feet Offsite Wetland B N/A III Depressional FO 18/6 Moderate 110 feet ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS IN THE DISTURBED AREAS Much of the north half of the wetland was impacted during site preparati on activities that included construction of a driveway for access to the property. Clearing was undertaken prior to installation of the driveway and involved removal of forested vegetation from a portion of the onsite wetland and required buffer. The portions of the wetland along the north and south property lines were not cleared and represent the conditions of the disturbed wetland (ELS 2015). Piles of cleared vegetation remain in portions of the wetland and buffer (Photoplates 2 and 3). The driveway was constructed across the north edge of the cleared wetland and a culvert was installed under the driveway to allow continued water flow. The remainder of the cleared wetland was then dredged from the south end of the culvert (outfall) and extended to the limits of the clearing.The removed plant species included red alder (Alnus rubra), salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis),slough sedge (Carex obnupta),lady fern (Athyrium filix-femina), and water parsley (Oenanthe sarmentosa). During the 2015 site visits, these species were beginning to recover where the dredge spoils were spread. The clearing, dredging, and filling of the wetland has disrupted the onsite functions and impacted the connectivity of the wetland to downstream systems. The water quality function was significantly disturbed by clearing, which removed all of the vegetation layers and caused this area of the wetland to no longer function to improve water quality. The dredging of soil material from the wetland further disrupted this function and decreased the water quality of downstream areas. The hydrologic functions were not significantly reduced but the method of water storage Gybe Ho Road Property Ecological Land Services, Inc. Draft Wetland and Buffer Restoration Plan December 2015 4 was altered. The wetland previously performed hydrologic functions by storage of water in the organic soil profile and in small depressions formed in the terrain. By dredging the wetland, the function was altered to an above-ground storage situation. The general habitat functions and connectivity to other habitats were disturbed when the wetland was cleared, which was further disrupted by the dredging and filling activities. Presently, the open water and filled sections of the wetland are providing a different set of habitat components. This change in habitat components may not have reduced the habitat provided by this wetland but it drastically changed it from its original functions.Wetland impacts are summarized in Table 1 in the Project Description section above. RESTORATION APPROACH AND DESIGN The restoration plan has been designed in accordance with requirements of the Washington State Wetland Mitigation Guidelines, Volumes 1 and 2 (Ecology 2006). The general approach to the restoration is to replace the soils that were removed from the wetland and to replace lost vegetation. The goal is to initiate a trend to a forested vegetation community similar to what was cleared for the site activities. The plan describes the steps necessary to restore all of the impacts that have occurred to the onsite portion of wetland. Restoration Sequencing The impacts of the onsite disturbed wetland require that the restoration activities be conducted in a specific order to ensure full restoration of the lost wetland functions.The restoration activities will include: Remove the driveway and culvert from the north end of the disturbed wetland. The material from the driveway will be stockpiled outside the wetland and undisturbed buffer for use in construction of the new driveway onto the property. Scrape dredge spoils from the filled wetland areas and place into dredged wet land area. Upland soils may be inadvertently included within the dredge spoils and will not be considered wetland fill. The minor amounts of upland soil will aid in ensuring the spoils are placed so that pre-disturbed elevations are achieved. Place some of the large woody debris in the restored wetland and buffer from the piles that remain within the wetland and buffer. The large woody debris placed will mostly include larger logs and root wads. The remainder of the woody debris will be removed from the wetland and buffer areas and disposed of at an appropriate location.However, it may be used as woody mulch that will be placed over the graded surface. Plant the disturbed wetland and buffer areas with native trees and shrubs to restore the lost forested community. The herbaceous layer will not be planted as part of the restoration plan because herbaceous and emergent plants are expected to recover naturally due significant seed sources in the dredge spoils. Restoration Strategy The goal of the restoration is to restore the functions of the disturbed portion of the onsite wetland area.The proposed restoration will provide no net loss of wetland area and wetland functions.Restoration activities will require use of heavy equipment to fully remove the fill (dredge spoils and driveway) from the disturbed wetland area and to return the spoils to the Gybe Ho Road Property Ecological Land Services, Inc. Draft Wetland and Buffer Restoration Plan December 2015 5 dredged wetland. Grading activities will take place during the summer months to take advantage of low water levels. All restoration activities will be fully supervised by the project biologist to ensure the wetland is restored to pre-disturbed conditions. Planting Plan Table 3.Draft Tree and Shrub Specifications Species Scientific Name Stock Spacing Quantity Wetland Plantings Trees Red alder Alnus rubra Gallon 10-feet on-center 25-30 Western red cedar Thuja plicata Gallon 10-feet on-center 25-30 Total 50-60 Shrubs Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis Gallon 5-feet on-center 75-100 Black twinberry Lonicera involucrata Gallon 5-feet on-center 75-100 Total 150-200 Buffer Plantings Trees Western red cedar Thuja plicata Gallon 10-feet on-center 45-50 Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii Gallon 10-feet on-center 45-50 Bigleaf maple Acer macrophyllum Gallon 10-feet on-center 45-50 Total 135-150 Shrubs Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis Gallon 5-feet on-center 145-150 Ocean spray Holodiscus discolor Gallon 5-feet on-center 145-150 Indian plum Oemleria cerasiformis Gallon 5-feet on-center 145-150 Total 435-450 Plant Specifications Gallon Stock Gallon species will be purchased from a native plant nursery. Plants will have well-developed roots and sturdy stems, with an appropriate root -to-shoot ratio. All stock must be kept cool and moist prior to installation. The project biologist will be responsible for inspecting the stock prior to and during planting; unacceptable plant materials will not be planted. Table 3 provides a draft native plant list for the restoration area. Plants specified for restoration are species that are currently growing in the undisturbed area of the onsite wetland. Shrubs will be installed in clumps of 5 to 6 throughout the wetland at a rough spacing of 5 feet on center. Trees will be installed individually throughout the disturbed wetland at rough spacing of 10 feet on center. Plants will be installed in the disturbed buffer areas and will include species that are currently growing within the upland portion of the property. Plants will be installed following grading activities to fill in the dredged portion during the late fall to early spring when the site conditions are wettest and the plants are dormant. Gybe Ho Road Property Ecological Land Services, Inc. Draft Wetland and Buffer Restoration Plan December 2015 6 GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Restoration Goal The goal of restoration is to restore the disturbed wetland and buffer areas to pre-disturbance conditions. Objectives and Performance Standards The following objectives and performance standards will ensure that the restoration goal is achieved. Objective 1. Restore pre-impact forested and scrub-shrub conditions throughout the disturbed wetland and buffer areas. Performance Standard #1a Restore wetland to pre-disturbance conditions. Remove driveway to native soil and culvert from the wetland crossing. Scrape the dredge spoils to native soil from the filled areas of wetland and place back into dredged area of wetland. Spread large woody debris in wetland from piles in the wetland following replacement of the dredge spoils. Objective #2:Install native trees and shrubs within disturbed wetland and buffer areas to restore the cleared forested wetland system. Performance Standard #2a Plant Survival Years 1-2 100 percent survival of all plants including tree, shrub, and emergent species. Years 3-5 If survival rate met in Years 1 and 2, no additional survival rate monitoring shall be conducted. Performance Standard #2b Vegetation Cover Yearly percent coverage standards are proposed for the tree and shrub species proposed within the restored wetland and buffer areas. The following yearly standards are proposed for the tree and shrub layers. Year 1:10-15 percent cover by installed/volunteer native woody plants. Year 2:15-20 percent cover by installed/volunteer native woody plants. Year 3:20-25 percent cover by installed/volunteer native woody plants. Year 5:35-40 percent cover by installed/volunteer native woody plants. Performance Standard #2c Emergent Understory Coverage The emergent cover within the restored wetland is expected to recover naturally due to the seed sources remaining within the dredge spoils. For this reason, it is expected that coverage by emergent will expand yearly but at a different rate than the trees and shrubs, therefore, the yearly standards are slightly less than for the woody plants. Year 1:minimum 10 percent cover. Year 2:minimum 15 percent cover. Year 3:minimum 20 percent cover. Year 5:minimum 25 percent cover. Gybe Ho Road Property Ecological Land Services, Inc. Draft Wetland and Buffer Restoration Plan December 2015 7 Objective #3:Maintain Low Cover by Non-Native Invasives. Restoration plans often experience inputs of non-native plant species via seeds deposited by birds or swept in by wind. Low coverage by invasive plants is proposed to allow native plants to become prevalent within the wetland and buffer areas. Performance Standard #3a Non-Native Invasives Plant Coverage Years 1 to 5: Less than 10 percent cover by non-native exotics including but not limited to reed canarygrass, evergreen or Himalayan blackberry, and Scot’s broom. Objective #4:Maintain the Original Boundary of Wetland A by the end of the 5-year monitoring period. Performance Standard #4a Original Wetland Boundary Year 1 and Year 3: Conduct delineation and survey of Wetland A during Year 1 and Year 5 monitoring visits to ensure that there have been no changes to the original wetland area. MONITORING PLAN The restoration area will be monitored once during the mid to late growing season for a 5-year period following plant installation.The goal of monitoring is to determine if the performance standards are being met.Monitoring will occur in Years 1, 2, 3, and 5,and monitoring reports will be submitted to Jefferson County and Ecology by December 31st of the monitored year. Three to four individual monitoring plots marked with labeled steel posts will be established to assess native plant survival and cover throughout the restored wetland and buffer.Additionally, up to 6 photo stations will be established throughout the restoration area including one at each monitoring plot. Vegetation Emergent/Herbaceous Monitoring will document the natural recovery of the herbaceous plant layer using percent cover methodology within the designated monitoring plots. The following information will be included at each plot: Percent cover of herbaceous species (10-foot by 10-foot plot) General health of plants in the monitoring plot, noting specific problems and potential causes Photo documentation of vegetative changes Scrub-shrub and Forested Monitoring will document the survival and percent cover of trees and shrubs within the designated planting areas. The following information will be included at each plot: Percent survival (Years 1 and 2) Percent cover of scrub-shrub and tree species General health of plants in the monitoring plot, noting specific problems and potential causes Gybe Ho Road Property Ecological Land Services, Inc. Draft Wetland and Buffer Restoration Plan December 2015 8 Photo documentation of vegetative changes Monitoring Report Contents The annual monitoring reports will contain at least the following: Location map and as-built drawing Historic description of project, including dates of plant installation, current year of monitoring, and restatement of restoration goals, objectives, and performance standards Description of monitoring methods Record of site maintenance activities (mowing, watering, replanting, etc.) Assessment of site achievement of performance standards Observations of wildlife Photographs Summary of maintenance and contingency measures proposed for the next season and completed for the past season MAINTENANCE Maintenance in the restoration areas will include watering as necessary during growing season in the first three years of monitoring and hand clearing or weed eating competitive grasses from bases of planted trees and shrubs as needed during the growing season. If the planting area is failing, steps will be taken to rectify the situation in a timely manner. The following steps will be implemented when an area is identified as failing or po tentially failing: Identify the cause(s) of the failure or potential failure Identify the extent of the failure or potential failure Implement corrective actions such as irrigating, fertilizing, and replanting Document the activities and include this data in the annual monitoring and maintenance reports In the event that a routine corrective action will not correct the problem, immediately consult with the appropriate agencies Evaluate recommendations from resource agency staff and implement recommendations in a timely manner CONTINGENCY PLAN If the performance standards are not met by the third year following plant installation, a contingency plan will be developed and implemented. All contingency actions will be undertaken only after consulting and gaining approval from Ecology and Jefferson County. The applicant will be required to complete a contingency plan that describes: 1) the causes of failure, 2) proposed corrective actions, 3) a schedule for completing corrective actions, and 4) whether additional maintenance and monitoring are necessary. Gybe Ho Road Property Ecological Land Services, Inc. Draft Wetland and Buffer Restoration Plan December 2015 9 LIMITATIONS ELS personnel base the conclusions contained within this report on standard scientific methodology and best professional judgment. In our opinion, local, state,and federal regulatory agencies should agree with the findings presented in this report. The services described in this report were performed consistent with generally accepted professional consulting principles and practices. There are no other warranties, express or implied. The services preformed were consistent with our agreement with our client. This report is prepared solely for the use of our client and may not be used or relied upon by a third party for any purpose. Any such use or reliance will be at such party’s risk. Gybe Ho Road Property Ecological Land Services, Inc. Draft Wetland and Buffer Restoration Plan December 2015 10 REFERENCES Jefferson County Unified Development Code.Chapter 18.22, Critical Areas, Article VI Wetlands. Ecological Land Services, Inc. 2015.Wetland Delineation Report for Gybe Ho Road Property, Nordland, Washington.August 2015. Washington State Department of Ecology, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District,and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10. March 2006.Wetland Mitigation in Washington State –Part 1: Agency Policies and Guidance (Version 1).Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #06-06-011a. Olympia, WA. Washington State Department of Ecology, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District,and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10. March 2006.Wetland Mitigation in Washington State –Part 2:Developing Mitigation Plans (Version 1).Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #06-06-011a. Olympia, WA FIGURES NOTE: USGS topographic quadrangle map reproduced using MAPTECH Inc., Terrain Navigator Pro software. LOCATION MAP WASHINGTON 48.0212° Latitude -122.6905° Longitude SITE SITE PROJECT VICINITY MAP SCALE IN MILES 30150 CAMAS QUILCENE QUEETS NEAH BAY CLALLAM BAY 5 542 542 209 LOPEZ FRIDAY HARBOR ORCAS ANACORTES LAKE ROSS ROCKPORT BELLINGHAM FERNDALE LYNDENBLAINE SEDRO WOOLLEY MOUNT VERNON OAK HARBOR STANWOOD DARRINGTON ARLINGTON EVERETT MUKILTEO 9 MONROE PORT TOWNSEND 113 112 SEQUIM ANGELES PORT 101 FORKS MORTON KELSOLONGVIEW HOQUIAM ABERDEEN MONTESANOOCEAN SHORES WESTPORT RAYMOND CENTRALIA CHEHALIS WINLOCK CASTLE ROCK CATHLAMET WOODLAND 5 12 12 6 5044 12 101 PACIFIC BEACH GRAYS HARBOR PACIFIC LEWIS COWLITZ WAHKIAKUM KALAMA ELMA 5 BATTLE GROUND VANCOUVER NORTH BONNEVILLE STEVENSON CARSON MT. ST. HELENS MOSSYROCK RANDLE PACKWOOD EATONVILLE MT. RAINIER ROY ORTING BUCKLEY ENUMCLAWPUYALLUP DUPONT TENINO YELM OLYMPIA SHELTON HOODSPORT GIG TACOMA AUBURN KENT NORTH BEND SEATTLE DUVALL BOTHELL SKYKOMISH 14 LA CENTER 503 5 SKAMANIA CLARK MASON KING THURSTON PIERCE KITSAP 505 127 123 410161 101 3 3 18 90 2 WAY 101 101 ILWACO OCEAN PARK LONG BEACH COPALIS BEACH JEFFERSON CLALLAM SNOHOMISH SKAGIT WHATCOM ISLAND SAN JUAN AMANDA PARK SOUTH BEND KIRKLAND REDMOND BELLEVUE HARBOR FEDERAL PORT ORCHARD BREMERTON POULSBO STEILACOOM RIDGEFIELD WASHOUGAL SITE 12/17/2015 10:56 AM s:\ELS\WA\jefferson\Nordland\2281-wilkins\2281.01-gybe ho property\2281.01-figures\2281.01_Restoration.dwg Jack N S W EDATE:DWN:REQ. BY:PRJ. MGR:CHK:PROJECT NO:Figure 1VICINITY MAP12/17/152281.01Gybe Ho PropertyTim WilkinsSection 9, Township 29N, Range 1E, W.M.Nordland, Jefferson County, WAJLLJBSCALE IN FEET0200040001157 3rd Ave., Suite 220ALongview, WA 98632Phone: (360) 578-1371Fax: (360) 414-9305www.eco-land.com Existing Gravel RoadProposed Fence Line 11 0 ' Culvert (To be Removed) Driveway (To be Removed) Proposed Future Driveway NOTE(S): 1.Aerial from Google Earth™12/17/2015 10:56 AM s:\ELS\WA\jefferson\Nordland\2281-wilkins\2281.01-gybe ho property\2281.01-figures\2281.01_Restoration.dwg Jack N S W EDATE:DWN:REQ. BY:PRJ. MGR:CHK:PROJECT NO:Figure 2RESTORATION PLAN OVERVIEW12/17/152281.01Gybe Ho PropertyTim WilkinsSection 9, Township 29N, Range 1E, W.M.Nordland, Jefferson County, WAJLLJBSCALE IN FEET040801157 3rd Ave., Suite 220ALongview, WA 98632Phone: (360) 578-1371Fax: (360) 414-9305www.eco-land.comLEGEND: Site Boundary Wetland Boundary Wetland Buffer Cleared Buffer Area (14,882 sq.ft) Filled Wetland (2,962 sq.ft) Dredged Wetland (613 sq.ft) Cleared Wetland (5,198 sq.ft) Undisturbed Wetland (5,895 sq.ft) NOTE(S): 1.Aerial from Google Earth™ 2.Horizontal logs and root wads to be placed in the restored wetland.12/17/2015 10:56 AM s:\ELS\WA\jefferson\Nordland\2281-wilkins\2281.01-gybe ho property\2281.01-figures\2281.01_Restoration.dwg Jack N S W EDATE:DWN:REQ. BY:PRJ. MGR:CHK:PROJECT NO:Figure 3WETLAND RESTORATION MAP12/17/152281.01Gybe Ho PropertyTim WilkinsSection 9, Township 29N, Range 1E, W.M.Nordland, Jefferson County, WAJLLJBSCALE IN FEET030601157 3rd Ave., Suite 220ALongview, WA 98632Phone: (360) 578-1371Fax: (360) 414-9305www.eco-land.comLEGEND: Site Boundary Wetland Boundary Wetland Buffer Species Red Alder Western Red Cedar Scientific Name Alnus rubra Thuja plicata Spacing Quantity 25-30 25-30 Wetland Restoration Planting 10' o.c. 10' o.c. Stock Gallon Gallon 50-60Total Trees Salmonberry Black Twinberry Rubus spectabilis Lonicera involucrata 75-100 75-100 5' o.c. 5' o.c. Gallon Gallon 150-200Total Shrubs Cleared Wetland (5,198 sq.ft) Undisturbed Wetland (5,895 sq.ft) Proposed Fence Line 11 0 ' NOTE(S): 1.Aerial from Google Earth™12/17/2015 10:56 AM s:\ELS\WA\jefferson\Nordland\2281-wilkins\2281.01-gybe ho property\2281.01-figures\2281.01_Restoration.dwg Jack N S W EDATE:DWN:REQ. BY:PRJ. MGR:CHK:PROJECT NO:Figure 4BUFFER PLANTING PLAN12/17/152281.01Gybe Ho PropertyTim WilkinsSection 9, Township 29N, Range 1E, W.M.Nordland, Jefferson County, WAJLLJBSCALE IN FEET0601201157 3rd Ave., Suite 220ALongview, WA 98632Phone: (360) 578-1371Fax: (360) 414-9305www.eco-land.comSpecies Douglas Fir Scientific Name Pseudotsuga menziesii Spacing Quantity TBD TBD Buffer Restoration Planting 10' o.c. 10' o.c. Stock Gallon Gallon TBDTotal Trees Salmonberry Ocean Spray Rubus spectabilis Holodiscus discolor TBD TBD 5' o.c. 5' o.c. Gallon Gallon TBDTotal Shrubs Western Red Cedar Thuja plicata Bigleaf Maple Acer macrophyllum TBD10' o.c.Gallon Indian Plum Oemleria cerasiformis TBD5' o.c.Gallon LEGEND: Site Boundary Wetland Boundary Wetland Buffer Cleared Buffer Area (14,882 sq.ft) 1157 3rd Ave., Suite 220A Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 Fax: (360) 414-9305 DATE:12/7/15 DWN:JB PRJ. MGR JB PROJ.#:2281.01 Photoplate #1 Project Name:Gybe Ho Road Property Restoration Plan Client: Tim Wilkins Jefferson County, Washington Photo 1 is taken from the north end of the property on Gybe Ho Road. It looks southwesterly from the start of the driveway constructed earlier this year. The photo shows the south half of the disturbed wetland and buffer area for which the restoration plan has been prepared.Some of the spoils removed from the wetland were placed in this location. The restoration plan proposes to replace the spoils and replant. Photo 3 is taken from the same location as Photos 1 and 2. It looks northwesterly toward the undisturbed forested wetland area immediately north of the impacted wetland and buffer area.Spoils from the dredging were placed in this location and will be spread back into the wetland as part of the restoration plan. Photo 2 is taken from the same location as Photo 1 and looks north along the trail. The area beyond the maple tree on the right is a historic clearing that is now dominated by blackberry thickets. Photo 2 is taken from the same location as Photo 1. It looks westerly along the driveway with the disturbed wetland and buffer areas to the right and left.The driveway will be removed as part of the restoration plan. It will be moved to another location around the onsite and offsite wetlands. 1157 3rd Ave., Suite 220A Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 Fax: (360) 414-9305 DATE:12/7/15 DWN:JB PRJ. MGR JB PROJ.#:2281.01 Photoplate 2 Project Name:Gybe Ho Road Property Restoration Client: Tim Wilkins Jefferson County, Washington Photo 4 was taken on May 15, 2015 from the driveway at the culvert installed to allow water flow from one side to the other. The area shown is primarily wetland that was dredged during construction of the driveway. The wetland extends up the slope on both sides of the created drainage.Spoils removed from the dredged area were spread on both sides of the new channel. Photo 6 is taken on the same day and from the same location as Photo 5. It looks across the disturbed area of wetland west of the drainage channel pictured in Photos 4 and 5. The dredge spoils were spread across this area of wetland so represents wetland fill.The restoration proposes to replace the spoils. Photo 2 is taken from the same location as Photo 1 and looks north along the trail. The area beyond the maple tree on the right is a historic clearing that is now dominated by blackberry thickets. Photo 5 is taken on June 15, 2015 from the same location as Photo 4. Water is no longer present in the drainage except in a very small portion in the shady portion of the photo. 1157 3rd Ave., Suite 220A Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 Fax: (360) 414-9305 DATE:12/7/15 DWN:JB PRJ. MGR JB PROJ.#:2281.01 Photoplate 3 Project Name:Gybe Ho Road Property Restoration Client: Tim Wilkins Jefferson County, Washington Photo 10 was taken during the June 15, 2015 field visit from the edge of the undisturbed wetland north of the driveway. It looks south across the driveway and shows much of the disturbed wetland area for which restoration is proposed. The areas shown in this photo will be restored by replacing spoils and planting with native vegetation. Photo 12 is taken from the same location as Photo 11. It looks northeasterly toward the undisturbed wetland area. The area in the foreground is disturbed by clearing and filling.Photo 2 is taken from the same location as Photo 1 and looks north along the trail. The area beyond the maple tree on the right is a historic clearing that is now dominated by blackberry thickets. Photo 11 is taken from the driveway at the culvert crossing. It looks north into the narrow disturbed area between the driveway and the undisturbed forest. The pile of large woody debris in this photo will be placed in the restored wetland following replacement of spoils and prior to plant installation.Smaller parts may be chipped into woody mulch and spread over the restored wetland. 1157 3rd Ave., Suite 220A Longview, WA 98632 (360) 578-1371 Fax: (360) 414-9305 DATE:12/7/15 DWN:JB PRJ. MGR JB PROJ.#:2281.01 Photoplate 4 Project Name:Gybe Ho Road Property Restoration Client: Tim Wilkins Jefferson County, Washington Photo 13 was taken from the same location as Photos 11 and 12 (Photoplate 3). It looks down into the section of disturbed wetland on the north side of the culvert. Photo 15 is taken of the disturbed buffer area west of the wetland and north of the unpermitted driveway. This area will be replanted with native trees to recover buffer vegetation. Shrub and herbaceous layers will recover naturally because remnant vegetation is present throughout. Photo 2 is taken from the same location as Photo 1 and looks north along the trail. The area beyond the maple tree on the right is a historic clearing that is now dominated by blackberry thickets. Photo 14 was taken from the driveway at the culvert crossing.It looks southeasterly into the disturbed wetland and buffer area south of the driveway and east of the dredged channel.