HomeMy WebLinkAboutRestoration Plan PN 921092007Gybe Ho Road Property Restoration Plan
Jefferson County, Washington
September 8, 2016
Prepared for:
Tim Wilkins
10953 Madison Avenue
Bainbridge Island, Washington 98110
(206)380-7345
U
1�E SUR\
S�
�ESSM�'
MARINE SURVEYS It ASSESSMENTS
267 Hudson Street
Port Townsend WA 98368
(360)385.4073
marine.su"eys.inc@gmait.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................4
PROJECTDESCRIPTION.............................................................................................4
Updated Wetland Impact and Restoration Summary Table.................................5
SITEDESCRIPTION.................................................................................................6
Wetlands.........................................................................................................7
CURRENT CONDITONS.........................................................................................7
RESTORATION APPROACH AND DESIGN.............................................................7
Restoration Sequencing..................................................................................8
RestorationStrategy......................................................................................8
Amended Restoration Tables.........................................................................9
PlantingPlan........................................................................................................9
Updated Tree and Shrub Specifications Table...............................................9
PlantSpecifications.............................................................................................
10
AMENDED GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS...........
11
RestorationGoal.................................................................................................I
I
Objectives and Performance Standards..............................................................I
I
MONITORINGPLAN...................................................................................................
13
Vegetation...........................................................................................................13
Monitoring Report Contents................................................................................
14
MAINTENANCEPLAN...................................................................................................
15
CONTINGENCYPLAN..................................................................................................
15
SUMMARY......................................................................................................................
15
REFERENCES..................................................................................................................
17
2
Figures and Appendices
Figure 1 Site and Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Wetland Restoration Map
Figure 3 Buffer Planting Plan Map
Figure 4 Buffer Planting Plan Map
Figures 5-16 Site Photos
Appendix A Washington Department of Ecology (WECY) Agreed Order #13100. January 6,
2016
Appendix B Washington Department of Ecology (WECY) Letter of Violation June 3, 2016
Appendix C Jefferson County Department of Community Development (DCD) Fence Permit
#BLD15-00143
INTRODUCTION
Marine Surveys & Assessments, Inc. (MSA) was authorized by the landowner Tim Wilkins to
prepare an amended restoration plan for his property at 413 Gybe Ho Road, Nordland,
Washington in Jefferson County. The subject property, parcel number 921092007 is located in
the NW 1/4 of Section 9, Township 29W, Range lE (Figure 1 Site & Vicinity Map). According
to the Jefferson County Accessor, parcel 921092007 includes 5.13 acres (223,462.80 square
feet). This amended restoration plan is required to rectify disturbances to the onsite wetland and
required buffer per the violation orders issued by the Washington Department of Ecology
(WECY) in June of 2015 (Appendix A), January of 2016 (Appendix B) and again in June of
2016 (Appendix C) (WECY).
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
In 2015 Ecological Land Services, Inc. (ELS) was contracted by the landowner to perform a
wetland delineation and restoration plan for this property. These reports documented a category
III depressional wetland and designated a 110-foot buffer. ELS also documented disturbances to
this wetland and its associated buffer, resulting from a driveway was installed on the eastern half
of the property from Gybe Ho Road. The ELS restoration plan proposed to restore functions of
this wetland which were impacted by clearing, dredging, filling and the installation of a culvert.
Subsequent to this plan further disturbance occurred in the buffer area, which was itemized in a
May 25th, 2016 notification letter of violation of WECY Agreed Order (AO) #13100 (Appendix
B), at which point the client was prohibited from any further work in the wetlands or their
buffers without WECY and local approval.
The following amended restoration plan proposes to mitigate for the violations of AO #13100
(Appendix B) by increasing the amount of restoration and insuring oversight of the entire project
by a wetland specialist approved by WECY and Jefferson County Department of Community
Development (DCD). This plan is intended to enable our client, Tim Wilkins, to succeed in
restoring the wetland vegetation and functions to the disturbed wetland and wetland buffer on
this property to the satisfaction of all regulatory agencies involved. It is our intention in this
amended plan to comply with the objectives and standards of the 2015 restoration plan created
by ELS, as outlined below, with the following changes:
1) The area on Table 1. under Impact Area Amount - Wetland A Buffer will now read: 0.624
acres (27,181 square feet) to include the newly impacted area.
2) Hydrology in the wetland will be monitored yearly.
3) The performance standards will be monitored for 10 years. For this forested, shmb/scrub
wetland WECY is requiring a 10 year monitoring plan.
4) The wetland and buffer boundaries will be visibly marked with permanent stakes noting the
critical area boundary.
5) All aspects of the restoration of the wetland and buffer including the removal and wetland
reconstruction of the driveway will be done under the supervision of an approved wetland
specialist.
6) Specific directions for the placement and/or disposal of woody debris created by the
disturbances on this property will be made by the onsite biologist.
Restoration will begin with immediate removal of the existing driveway, culvert and any non-
native fill that was placed in the wetland so that it can be finished in the dry season, thus creating
the least additional disturbance. The driveway and dredged area will be filled and graded with
the spoils previously removed from the wetland. Small woody debris left from clearing will be
chipped and spread over the graded area prior to planting. Large woody debris and root wads
will be placed in the wetland sufficient to supply habitat and any excess will be chipped or
removed from the wetland and buffer areas. All work will be performed by hand wherever
possible and with the lightest possible heavy equipment where required. Prior to planting, soil
moisture level will be assessed by the onsite biologist to ensure sufficient saturation of the soil
prior to planting with native vegetation. The impacted areas in the wetland and its buffer will be
planted with native trees and shmbs as per the following planting plan. As proposed in the ELS
Restoration Plan, the emergent and herbaceous vegetation will be derived from the seed bank
within the dredge spoils returned to the wetland. If emergent cover is not achieved through the
existing seed bank in the spoils, a planting plan for herbaceous plants will be developed and
implemented. Invasive plants will be removed by hand weeding. There will be no use of
herbicides or pesticides in the wetland or its buffer. All stages of road removal, restoration and
planting will be overseen by an approved wetland specialist.
The following updated table from the ELS Restoration Plan lays out the restoration for each
impact area:
Table 1 ** Updated Wetland Impact and Restoration Summary
Impact Area
Impact
Impact
Proposed 14491WOon
Type
Amount
• Remove driveway and culvert from the
Filling
0.07 ac (2,962
wetland and buffer prior to replacement of
Wetland A
(Driveway
sq. ft.)
dredge spoils.
& Spoils)
• Remove spoils from wetland and place into the
dredged area.
• Replace dredge spoils from wetland outside
the dredged channel.
0.01 ac (613 sq.
• Place limited amounts of large woody
Wetland A
Dredging
debris that remains in piles on the site
ft.)
will within the restored wetland area.
• Spread woody material chipped from the
onsite logging debris over the graded
wetland area.
• Plant wetland following replacement of dredge
spoils and removal of driveway.
Wetland A
Clearing
0.12 ac (5,198
sq. ft.)
,plants will include shrubs and trees.
Herbaceous understory expected to restore
naturally due to seed sources in dredged soils.
Wetland A Buffer
**0.624 ac
• Replant native trees and shrubs in the cleared
Clearingbuffer
(27,181 sq. ft.)
areas. Remove or chi excess wood
P Y
debris.
** Updated from Table #1 ELS Draft Wetland Restoration Plan December 2015
SITE DESCRIPTION
The parcel is currently accessed from Gybe Ho Road on the eastern boundary of the property.
Gybe Ho Road is 0.10 mile from T intersection where Washington State Highway 16 becomes
Flagler Road at the entrance of Marrowstone Island. Parcels to the immediate north, east and
south are occupied with single family residences. ELS prepared a wetland delineation, wetland
rating and restoration plan for this 0.255 ac depressional, forested, scrub -shrub wetland in 2015.
Prior to this, in the spring of 2015, a disturbance occurred in the wetland and buffer areas when a
driveway and culvert were constructed through the wetland. An area of approximately 0.12 ac of
the wetland was disturbed and an additional 0.34 ac of trees and shrubs were cleared in the
required 110-foot buffer. The logs and slash remain on the site (Figures 5 through 15). The
driveway in the wetland remains. All but one of the points on Figure 2 of the ELS 2015 Wetland
Delineation Report were located. Not all of the points where flagging was found matched their
respective GPS coordinates, possibly due to trees falling during a storm or during the clearing in
May of 2016. We were able to find the all test pit locations and the wetland boundary from the
delineation with GPS coordinates supplied to us by ELS. No fencing or other alterations have
occurred on the property. The landowner has agreed to move the proposed perimeter fence
outside of any wetland buffers. The status of the disturbed onsite wetland appeared to be
unchanged from the previous studies.
Wetlands
The delineated wetland on the property is approximately 0.25 acres (11,093 square feet) in size
and located in a slight depression on the eastern half of the property. Approximately half (0. 12
acres) of this wetland was impacted. Undisturbed wetland remains to the north and south of the
impacted area. This wetland continues south on to neighboring property. In addition to the
delineated wetland there are two wetlands adjacent to this property: One, called offsite Wetland
A in ELS delineation report, bordering the property to the east and another, offsite called
Wetland B, bordering the property to the west. The buffers of the offsite wetlands extend on to
the subject property overlapping, to some extent, the buffer of the delineated wetland.
These depressional wetlands and their 110 foot buffers were identified by ELS in June 2015 and
a formal delineation of the onsite wetland in accordance with Jefferson County Code (JCC)
Chapter 18.22, Article VI Wetland was completed. (Wetland Delineation Report for the Gybe He
Property Nordland, Washington ELS 2015).
CURRENT CONDITIONS
The landowner stated he was unable to remove the driveway from the wetland due to wet
weather conditions in the fall of 2015 and spring of 2016. Some restoration attempts were made
but they were not successful. During site visits in June and July 2016 no live restoration
plantings were found in the wedand or wetland buffer. Further disturbances occurred in the
buffer area in May of 2016. Approximately 0.28 acres (12,371 sq. ft.) of the wetland buffer was
disturbed as the landowner began a permitted fencing project (Appendix Q. Due to this recent
disturbance additional mitigation is required. None of the cleared vegetation has yet been
removed from the property. Invasive plants such as thistles and foxglove have begun
establishment in cleared areas. MSA staff visited the site in June of 2016 to take an initial look
at the project. At that time there was some signs of improperly stored fuel and oil on the site.
On a second visit in July of 2016 no improperly stored fuel or oil at the site or residue was
observed. The landowner stated that he had cleaned up all traces of the fuel and oil in the
wetland and wetland buffer.
RESTORATION APPROACH AND DESIGN
Restoration sequencing and strategy will follow the original ELS restoration plan with additional
planting in the required buffer. As stated in the ELS plan: All restoration activities will be fully
supervised by the project biologist to ensure the wetland is restored to pre -disturbed conditions.
This includes the road removal which will occur as soon as possible after the acceptance of this
amended plan. In order to accomplish this restoration in a timely manner it is critical that the
road and culvert are removed as soon as possible so that any heavy equipment work necessary
for this restoration occurs before the fall rains begin. This will ensure grading will occur during
the lowest water table season and enable planting during the wettest time and the dormant
season.
Restoration Sequencing
As stated in Washington State Wetland Mitigation Guidelines, Volumes 1 and 2 (Ecology 2006),
the primary goal is to minimize any further impacts to this wetland and to restore the critical
habitat and wetland functions to pre -disturbance conditions. The order in which this is done is
critical to the success of this restoration plan.
1) The driveway and culvert will be removed as soon as possible during the dry season. Fill
material removed may be stockpiled on the property for later use outside of an wetland
and required buffer areas.
2) Dredge spoils which were removed during the driveway construction will be returned to
bring the impacted wetland area to pre -disturbed elevations.
3) Large woody debris will be placed, under the direction of an approved wetland specialist,
in the restored wetland. Any remaining woody debris will be chipped and used for mulch
over the graded surface and planting areas or either removed from the property or placed
outside the wetland and the required buffers of this and the adjacent wetlands.
4) Prior to any planting, soil moisture will be assessed by a wetland specialist to ensure
sufficient soil saturation for plant survival. The disturbed wetland and buffer areas will
be planted during wet, dormant conditions, in late fall to early spring, with native trees
and shrubs restoring it to pre -disturbance conditions. If the herbaceous layer does not
recover from the existing seed bank an herbaceous planting plan will be required.
Restoration Strategy
The goal of this restoration is to restore wetland functions to the wetland on this property and to
restore the critical habitat in the wetland and it's required buffer to pre -disturbance conditions.
The proposed restoration will provide no net loss of wetland area and wetland functions. Any
and all restoration efforts that require the use of heavy equipment will occur during the dry
season to insure the least impact to this critical area. Special Gaze will be taken to avoid any
discharge of pollutants into the wetland and/or wetland buffers. All equipment will be checked
for leaks before entering the property. If any spill should occur, it will be cleaned up
immediately. Any fuel containers on the property will be secure and properly stored. All
restoration activities will be fully supervised by the project biologist to ensure the wetland is
restored to pre -disturbed conditions.
Amended Restoration Plan Tables and Planting Plan
The methods and course of action outlined in the December 2015 ELS Restoration Plan will be
followed, as shown below, with the addition of items highlighted:
Planting Plan
The overall planting plan will follow the ELS Restoration Plan however the quantities listed for
the buffer plantings are larger due to the expansion of the mitigation area. Plant specifications
will remain unchanged. Species chosen for this restoration are currently growing in the
undisturbed areas on this site. Table 3 shows the updated plant quantities for the buffer
plantings. Trees and shmbs planted will follow the planting plan in Figure 4. Trees will be
planted at approximately 10 foot centers and shrubs will be installed in clumps of 5 or 6 at
approximately 5 foot centers.
Table 3. "Updated Tree and Shrub Specifications
Species
Scientific
Name
Stock
Spacing
quantity
Wetland Plantings
Trees
Red alder
Alnus rubra
Gallon
10-feet on -center
25-30
Western red
cedar
Thuja plicata
Gallon
10-feet on -center
25-30
Total
50-60
Shrubs
Salmonberry
Rubus spectabilis
Gallon
5-feet on -center
75-100
Black twinbe nY
Lonicera
involucrata
Gallon
5-feet on -center
75-100
Total
150-200
Buffer Plantings
Trees
Western red
cedar
Thuja plicata
Gallon
10-feet on -center
85-95
Pseudotsuga
Douglas fir
menziesii
Gallon
10-feet on -center
85-95
Bigleaf maple
Acer
macrophyllum
Gallon
10-feet on -center
85-95
Total
255-285
Shrubs
Salmonberry,
Rubus spectabilis
Gallon
5-feet on -center
270-280
Holodiscus
Ocean spray
discolor
Gallon
5-feet on -center
270-280
Indian plum
Oemleria
cerasiformis
Gallon
5-feet on -center
270-280
Total
810-840
Updated from Table 43 ELS Draft Wetland Restoration Plan December 2015
Plant Specifications
Plant specifications follow the 2015 ELS Restoration Plan:
Gallon Stock
10
• Gallon species will be purchase from a native plant nursery.
• Plants will have well -developed roots and sturdy stems, with an appropriate root -to shoot
ratio and will be planted as soon as possible after purchase.
• All stock must be kept cool and moist prior to installation.
• The approved wetland specialist will be responsible for inspecting the stock prior to and
during planting; unacceptable plant materials will not be planted.
AMENDED GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
WECY is requiring 10-year monitoring therefore performance measures have been altered to
adhere to this requirement. The overall ELS monitoring plan will be followed but it will be
extended to reach the 10 year monitoring period. The restoration goals, objectives and
performance standards will follow the ELS plan as outlined below; amended measures are
bolded:
Restoration Goal
To restore the wetland functions and improve the wildlife habitat functions in the disturbed
forested, shrub/scrub wetland and buffer areas at 413 Gybe Ho Road to pre -disturbance
conditions.
Objectives and Performance Standards
The following objectives and performance standards will ensure that the restoration goal is
achieved.
Objective 1: Restore pre -impact forested and scrub -shrub conditions throughout the
disturbed wetland and buffer areas.
Performance Standard #la is unchanged from the ELS December 2015 Restoration Plan except
as noted below:
Performance standard #la Restore wetland to pre -disturbance conditions.
1) Remove driveway and culvert to native soil from the wetland crossing.
2) Scrape the dredge spoils to native soils from the filled areas of wetland
place back into dredged area of wetland.
3) Spread large woody debris in wetland from piles in the wetland
following replacement of dredged spoils.
11
Additionally:
4) Excess woody debris will be chipped and used for mulch or either
removed from the site or placed outside of any wetland or buffer
areas.
5) The entire driveway removal process will be overseen by an
approved wetland specialist.
Objective 2: Install native trees and shrubs within disturbed wetland and buffer areas to
restore the cleared forested wetland system.
Performance Standard #2a Plant Survival
Years 1-2 100 percent survival of all plants including tree, shrub and emergent
species one year after the site is planted. If all dead woody plantings are
replaced, the performance measure will be met.
Years 3-10 Survival will be monitored yearly. If all dead woody plantings are
replaced, the performance measure will be met.
Performance Standard #2b Vegetation Cover
Yearly percent coverage standards are proposed for the tree and shrub
species (planted and volunteer) proposed within the restored wetland and
buffer areas. The following yearly standards are proposed for the tree and
shrub layers
Year 1
10-15 percent cover by installed/volunteer native woody plants.
Year 2
15-20 percent cover by installed/volunteer native woody plants.
You 3
20-25 percent cover by installed/volunteer native woody plants.
Years
35-40 percent cover by installed/volunteer native woody plants.
Years 7 & 10
At least 3540 percent cover by installed/volunteer native woody
plants.
Performance Standard #2c Emergent Understory Coverage
The emergent cover within the restored wetland is expected to recover
naturally due to the seed sources remaining within the dredge spoils. For
this reason, it is expected that coverage by emergent will expand yearly
but at a different rate that trees and shmbs, therefore, the yearly standards
are slightly less than for woody plants.
12
All years In the event that minimum coverage is not achieved, a planting plan
for herbaceous plants will be developed and implemented. Aerial
cover of native, wetland (facultative and wetter) herbaceous plant
species will be at least 25 percent at year 10.
Year
1
minimum 10 percent cover
Year
2
minimum 15 percent cover
Year
3
minimum 20 percent cover
Year
5
minimum 25 percent cover
Year
8
minimum 25 percent cover
Year
10
minimum 25 percent cover
Objective 3: Maintain Low Cover by Non -Native Invasives. Restoration plans often
experience inputs of non-native plant species via seeds deposited by birds or swept in by
wind. Low coverage by invasive plants is proposed to allow native plants to become
prevalent within the wetland and buffer areas
Performance Measure #3a Non -Native Invasives Plant Coverage
All Years Less than 10 percent cover by non-native exotics including but not limited
to reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea), evergreen or Himalayan
blackberry blackberries (Rubes armeniacus and R. laciniatus), and Scotch
broom (Cytisus scopartus) Removal of invasives will be done by hand.
No herbicides or pesticides will be used in the wetland or buffer areas.
MONITORING PLAN
The plan for monitoring will follow the ELS 2015 Restoration Plan with additional monitoring
years. Monitoring will occur in Years 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 and 10, and monitoring reports will be
submitted to Jefferson County and WECY by December 31" of the monitored year.
Additionally, on Year 1, labeled wooden stakes will be installed visibly marking the
boundary of the wetland and labeled steel posts will be installed visibly marking the
boundary the required buffers. 10 foot by 10 foot monitoring plots marked with labeled steel
posts will be established to assess native plant survival and cover throughout the restored
wetland and buffer. Four individual plots will be established in the buffer area and two
individual plots will be established in the wetland area. Additionally, six photo stations will be
established throughout the restoration area including one at each monitoring plot.
Vegetation
Emergent/Herbaceous
13
Monitoring will document the natural recovery of the herbaceous plant layer using percent cover
methodology within the designated monitoring plots. The following information will be
included at each plot:
• Percent cover of herbaceous species (10'x10' plot)
• General health of plants in the monitoring plot, noting specific problems and potential
causes
• Photo documentation of vegetative changes
• In the event the required percent cover is not achieved a planting plan will be
developed and implemented for the herbaceous layer
Scrub -shrub and forested
Monitoring will document the survival and percent cover of trees and shrubs within the
designated planting areas. The following information will be included at each plot:
• Percent Survival (All monitoring years)
• Percent cover of scrub -shrub and tree species
• General health of plants in monitoring plot, noting specific problems and potential causes
• Photo documentation of vegetative changes
Monitoring Report Contents
The annual monitoring reports will contain at least the following:
• Location map and as -built drawing
• Historic description of project including dates of plat installation, current year of
monitoring and restatement of restoration goals, objectives and performance standards
• Description of monitoring methods
• Record of site maintenance activities (mowing, watering, replanting, etc.)
• Assessment of site achievement of performance standards
• Observations of wildlife
• Photographs
• Summary of maintenance and contingency measures proposed for the next season and
completed for the past season
14
MAINTENANCE PLAN
Maintenance in the restoration areas will include watering as necessary during growing season in
the first three years of monitoring and hand clearing or weed eating competitive grasses and
invasives from bases of planted trees and shrubs as needed during the growing season. If the
planting area is failing, steps will be taken to rectify the situation in a timely manner. The
following steps will be implemented when an area is identified as failing or potentially failing:
• Identify the cause(s) of the failure or potential failure
• Identify the extent of the failure or potential failure
• Implement corrective actions such as irrigating, fertilizing, and replanting
• Document the activities and include this data in the annual monitoring and maintenance
reports
• In the event that a routine corrective action will not correct the problem, immediately
consult with the appropriate agencies
• Evaluate recommendations from resource agency staff and implement
recommendations in a timely manner
CONTINGENCY PLAN
If the performance standards are not met by the third year following plant installation, a
contingency plan will be developed and implemented. All contingency actions will be
undertaken only after consulting and gaining approval from WECY and DCD. The applicant
will be required to complete a contingency plan that describes: 1) the causes of failure, 2)
proposed corrective actions, 3) a schedule for completing corrective action, and 4) whether
additional maintenance and monitoring are necessary.
SUMMARY
This amended restoration plan is designed to restore the functions of this wetland which were
impacted by clearing, dredging, filling and the installation of a culvert to pre -disturbance
conditions.
we trust this information is sufficient for you at this time. Thank you for choosing Marine
Surveys & Assessments as your environmental consultant. If you have any further questions or
planning requirements for this project, please do not hesitate to call.
15
Respectfully submitted,
Marine Surveys & Assessments
Soozie Nichol
Staff Wetland Specialist
Amy Leitman
Senior Biologist, Owner
16
REFERENCES
Ecological Land Services, Inc. 2015. Wetland Delineation Report for Gybe Ho Road Property,
Nordland Washington. August 2015
Ecological Land Services, Inc. 2015. Draft Wetland and Buffer Restoration Plan for Gybe Ho
Road Property, Nordland Washington. December 2015
Jefferson County Unified Development Code. Chapter 18.22, Critical Areas, Article VI
Wetlands.
Washington State Department of Ecology, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Corps of Engineers and U.S. Department
of Fish and Wildlife. March 1994. Guidelines for Developing Freshwater
Wetlands Mitigation Plans and Proposals. Ecology Publication #94-29
Washington State Department of Ecology, October 2014. Modified from Appendix 8-C:
Guidance on Buffers and Ratios for Western Washington Wetlands in
Washington State Volume 2 —Protecting and Managing Wetlands. Ecology
Publication No. 05-06-008 Olympia WA
Washington State Department of Ecology, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, and
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10. Much 2006. Wetland
Mitigation in Washington State — Part 1: Agency Policies and Guidance (Version
1). Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #06-06-01la Olympia,
WA
Washington State Department of Ecology, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, and
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10. March 2006. Wetland
Mitigation in Washington State — Part 2: Developing Mitigation Plans (Version
1). Washington State Department of Ecology Publication #06-06-01la Olympia,
WA
Washington State Department of Transportation, Environmental Services Office Updated 2008.
Writing Performance Measures and Performance Standards for Wetland
Mitigation.
17
Figure 1. Site and Vicinity Map
Tim WIIMns Jefferson County Figure 1. Site and Vicinity Map
413 Gybe Ho Roatl Parcel #921092007 Wetlantl Restoration Plan by
Nortllentl, WA 98358 NW il4 S9 T29WR1E Soozie N thol Augusti8, 2016
IN
Legend
WetlarM Area
(`-" 110 Foot Buffer
Q Parcel Boundary 0 100 200 300 400 ft
i
18
Figure 2. Wetland Restoration Map
Tim Will Jell r County Figure 2. Welland Restoration Map
613 Gybe Ho Road Peri111821092007 Weland Restoration Plan ey
NordlarM, WA 98358 NW 1/4 S9 T29W RI Soozie N�Onol August 18, 2016
25 50 75 100 ft
a
Legend
Welland Area Boundary
Und'sturbed Wetland Area (6,142 sq it)
Total Disturbed Welland Area (5.271 sq ft)
Filled WeOmrd
Q Dredged Welland
110 Foal Buffer
Cleared Area within Buffer (27,181 sq ft)
--- Orle"ay
0 Parcel Boundary
19
r lgure a. wenann r1annng Plan
L ra
Sand R=W
Ad Planplan
nPlnnoNON aO WA 95358 S$g7y otOc
0 25 50 75 100 ft
LeMd
Wetland Area To Be Planned
Dredged Weiland
Filed Weiland
Q Disturbed Welland Area
--- Driveway
Wetland Area Boundary
Wetland Area
Cleared Area MNn Buffer
J 110 Foot Buffer
Q Parcel Boundary
ape"
StYentMO Neme
StOCe
alluding
Cha nitty
Welland Planange
Tress
Red Aker
AM rubra
1gal
10'o.o.
25-30
Western Red Cedar
Thuje gicata
1 gal
10' o.C.
25-M
Total
5060
Shrubs
Salmonberry
Rubus spectabilis
Igal
5'O.d.
75-100
Blank heinber
Lonioara imducrate
1 at
5'a.c.
75-100
Total
150.200
uwrne..wnaa m.wr�.a r..ae.e. mi.
LD
Figure 4. Buffer Planting Plan
Tim VNlkins
Jellersart County
Figure 4. Buffer Planting Plan
413 Gybe Ho Road
Parcel #921092007
Welland Restoration Plan by
Nordland, WA 98358
NW1/459 TMV ME
Soozie Nkeol August 18, 2016
i
I
i
Legend
__=_ _
`
- � Cleared Area within Buffer
t
110 Foot Buffer
Wetland Area
_.�
Wetland Area Boundary
- -- Driveway
Parcel Boundary
0
50 too 150
200I't
vV
SPeelaa
aelantlllo Nunn
Blaek
9PeN10
COerINd
Bu1M Plrmtlnpa
Shrubs
western Red CBtlar
Almre rubs
1 gel
10' O.C. 85-95
Douglas Fir
Thule dimta
1 gu
10' o.o.
8S85
Bigleer Mode
ACar meeraphylum
/gal
10 o.e.
86-95
Teel
255-255
BMrrW
BelmorlbaM
RuWsepeulabile
111a1
6'o.a
274280
Cotten re
Hobalecus tliecobr
1 N
6'oL
2'70-2e0
Indian dam
Oemleda cereelbrmb
1
5' oc,
270-280
Tool
a10-040
21
Figure 5. Looking south 185 degrees at driveway at wetland
Figure 6. Looking north 150 degrees on driveway in wetland
NA
♦':,�
� .
����� ri
-- _ r�i
� .,
.. w �..
Figure 8. Measuring north at driveway on wetland boundary
Figure 9. Looldng south 165 degrees at north fence line
24
C
Rr
T y
y R \ti �� -4
`� r
� Y �
rh
+ �
♦�:
S"u' `,
a+K ':y
( ��
_ �
..�-.�
._` -
1
jj �/%
i 1. �`l�. /:. �..
Figure 15. Looldng northwest 337 degrees at TP9
W
Figure 16. Looking north at TP9
PU
Appendix A. Washington Department of Ecology (WECI) Agreed Order
#13100. January 6, 2016
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
PO Box 47775 • Olympia, Washington 96504-7775 • (360) 407-6300
January 6, 2016
Timothy L Wilkins
10953 Madison Ave
Bainbridge Island, WA 98110
Re: Administrative Order
Dear Mr. Wilkins:
2711 (or 502) Gybe Ho Road,
Nordland, WA 98358; Jefferson
County Parcel #921092007
Enclosed is Agreed Order number 13100 between the Department of Ecology and Timothy L. Wilkins to
achieve compliance with state water quality standards. All correspondence relating to this document
should be directed to Rick Mrez at the Department of Ecology, Southwest Regional Office, PO Box
47775 Olympia, WA 98504-7775 or rmrez461@ecv.wa.¢0V.
If you have questions, please contact Rick Mraz at (360) 407-6221 or rmraz46I (a),ecv. wa.aov.
Sincerely,
Lund, unit Supervisor
Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program
Southwest Regional Office
Enclosures: Administrative Order Docket #13100
By certified mail: 7014 0150 0000 9188 5421
cc: Kerry Carroll, Ecology
Paula Ehlers, Ecology
Jerald Gregory, Army Corps of Engineers
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
IN THE MATTER OF AN ) ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER ) DOCKET#13100
AGAINST )
Timothy L. Wilkins )
To: Timothy L Wilkins
10953 Madison Ave
Bainbridge Island, WA 98110
Administrative Order
#13100
Docket
Site Name
Wilkins property, Marrowstone Island
Location
2711 (or 502) Gybe Ho Road, Nordland, WA 98358; Jefferson County
parcel # 921092007.
Description
Land clearing and fill activities not authorized by the Department of
Ecology in jurisdictional wetlands.
This is an Agreed Order between the Department of Ecology (Department) and the Timothy L. Wilkins to
achieve compliance with Chapter 90.48 Revised Code of Washington (RCW) and Chapter 173-201A
Washington Administrative Code (WAC) by taking certain actions which are described below for the
discharge of polluting matters into waters of the state at the subject property.
RECOGNITION OF THE DEPARTMENTS JURISDICTION : TT'
This Agreed Order is issued pursuant to the authority vested in the Deparonent by the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act (FWPCA), 33 USC sec 1311, et se . and by Chapter 90.48 RCW.
RCW 90.48.030 provides that the Department shall have the jurisdiction to control and prevent the
pollution of streams, lakes, rivers, ponds, inland waters, salt waters, water courses, and other surface and
underground waters of the state of Washington.
Timothy L. Wilkins agrees to undertake all actions required of it by the terms and conditions of this
Agreed Order and not to contest the Department's jurisdiction and authority to administer this Agreed
Order.
STIPULATED FACTS __;�,�,
RCW 90.48.120(2) authorizes the Department to issue administrative orders requiring compliance
whenever it determines that a person has violated or created a substantial potential to violate any
provision of Chapter 90.48 RCW. The Department's determination that a violation bas occurred is based
on the following facts:
Ecology staff conducted a site visit with you and your consultant on July 28, 2015, at which time Ecology
identified areas of cleared, graded, excavated and filled wetlands. On -site wetlands have been subject to
mechanized land clearing and the deposition of fill. Based upon a draft wetland restoration report,
prepared by Ecological Land Services and dated December 2015, approximately 0.2 acre of wetland has
been altered. Activities in wetlands were not authorized by the Department of Ecology through any
required permit process.
SCOPE OF WORK AND SCHEDULE
—. i;'i
For these reasons, and in accordance with RC W 90.48.120(2) IT IS AGREED, that Timothy L. Wilkins
shall take the following actions and not contest the Department's jurisdiction and authority to administer
this Agreed Order. These actions are necessary to satisfy the requirements of Chapter 173-201A WAC.
Timothy L. Wilkins has participated in defining these actions and the schedule by which they shall be
completed.
implementation
1. Timothy L. Wilkins shall restore impacts to wetlands as described in the Wetland Restoration
plan, prepared by Ecological Land Services (ELS) and dated December 2015, except m modified
in this Agreed Order or revised and approved by the
Department.
2. Timothy L. Wilkins shall begin the restoration project within two (2) months of the date of this
Agreed Order. If restoration does not begin within two (2) months, the Department may require
additional compensation to account for additional temporal loss.
Modifications to the W ethmd Restoration Plan
3. Required plant survival for monitoring year 2 is reduced to 90% and monitoring year 3 percent
survival is reduced to 80%. If 80% is achieved in year 3, no further monitoring for survival is
required.
4. An as -built report, prepared by a qualified wetland professional, shall be provided to the
Department within 30 days of completion of the restoration plantings.
5. The as -built report shall contain the following:
A. A report that identifies the date on which construction at the compensatory mitigation site was
completed and if there were any changes from the plan approved by the Department.
B. Drawings showing actual locations and quantities of plantings within the restoration area.
C. A list of any follow-up actions, if needed, with a schedule.
D. Plan sheets/drawings showing the as -built conditions.
E. Photos to document baseline conditions.
6. Alder and red cedar plantings in the restored wetland are to be doubled (50-60 plants of each
species).
Monitoring and Maintenance
7. Timothy L. Wilkins, or his agent, shall monitor the restoration site for a minimum of five (s)
years. Timothy L. Wilkins, or his agent, shall use the monitoring methods described on pages 7-8
of the Restoration Plan, or as revised and approved by the Department.
S. Timothy L. Wilkins shall submit monitoring reports as detailed on pages 7-8 of the Restoration
Plan.
9. Timothy L. Wilkins shall consult with the Department if unidentified contingency measures are
necessary.
10. Timothy L. Wilkins shall provide access to the site upon request by Ecology personnel for site
inspections, monitoring, necessary data collection, and/or to ensure that conditions of this Agreed
Order are being met.
PROHIBITION OF NM-(W RK_IN[TN.YATEWOF THESTAT
Timothy L. Wilkins is prohibited from undertaking regulated activities (i.e., mechanized clearing filling,
excavating draining, or any discharge of pollutants) within waters of the state or thew restored buffers on
the subject property, except for approved restoration work, until the actions defined in the "Scope of
Work and Schedule" Section of this Agreed Order are completed and the Department has issued a written
Order of Satisfaction.
Timothy L. Wilkins agrees to implement this prohibition.
Timothy L. Wilkins acknowledges that the restoration plan prepared by ELS applies to restoration wait
only, and that any future site development may require permitting from Jefferson County Department of
Community Development. Driveway spoils shall not be placed in wetland buffers without requisite
permitting. Additional mitigation for new work in wetland buffers may be required pursuant to that
permitting.
Timothy L. Wilkins shall provide regular progress reports to the Department on his efforts to comply with
the requirements of this Agreed Order. Progress reports shall be conducted and submitted consistent with
the monitoring plan on pages 7-8 of the Restoration Plan
Timothy L. Wilkins shall promptly notify the Department of any occurrence which may result in non-
compliance with the requirements of this Agreed Order. Such notification shall state the nature of the
potential non-compliance, the reason(s) therefore and the actions taken by Timothy L. Wilkins to address
the potential ran -compliance.
AMENDNENTSj0—F E AGREED SCOPE Q—FX6RK
Amendments to the agreed scope of work and schedule may be requested for good cause. Extension of
deadlines imposed by this Agreed Order shall be granted only when requests for extensions are submitted
in writing within 30 days of Timothy L. Wilkins becoming aware of a ciremnsmnce which may result in
non-compliance with the Restoration Plan.
To be effectivo, all proposed amendmews must be agreed to and signed by the persons with Signature
authority for. each party and attached to this Agreed Order.
TER INAT10N OF T+ gGREEQ=_Q.RDER
The Department shall issue an Order of Satisfaction upon finding that the restoration at the subject
property has been completed. Upon issuance, the requirements of this Agreed Order shall be deemed to
be fulfilled and shall have no further effect on Timothy L. Wilkins.
FAILUEtE TO COMPLY _
Failure to comply with this Agreed Order may result in the issuance of civil penalties of up to $10,000 per
day or other actions, whether administrative orjudicial, to enforce the terms of this Agreed Order.
CON7ACTINFORMATIbN .. - — �---"
Please direct all questions about this Order to:
Rick Mraz
Department of Ecology
Southwest Regional Office
p0 Box 47775
Olympia, WA 98504-7775
(360)407-6221
rmraz46
l
Date
Perry j Lpum, unit oup— •—
Shoplinds and Environmental Assistance Program
Southwest Regional Office
a0/ d
to
Timothy L. Wilkins
Appendix B. Washington Department of Ecology (WECI) Letter of Violation
June 3, 2016
01010
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
PO Box 47775 • Olympia, Washington 98304-7775 • (360) 407-6300
June 3, 2016
Timothy L Wilkins
10953 Madison Avenue
Bainbridge Island, WA 98110
Re: Agreed Order #13100; May 25, 2016, Site Visit Follow-up
2711 (or 502) Oybe Ho Road, Nordland, WA 98358; Jefferson County parcel #
921092007
Deer I& Wilkins:
The Department of Ecology (Ecology) recently conducted a site visit to check the progress
on your wetland restoration efforts, pursuant to the conditions of Agreed Order #13100
(AO). Present during the visit were Rick Mraz (Ecology), Joel Peterson (Jefferson
County), Rusty Rice (equipment operator), CJ. Riley (tenant fainter), and you.
The terms of the AO require you to restore impacts to wetlands, as described in the
December 2015 Wetland Restoration Plan (Restoration Plan). The AO also probibits any
further work in wetlands or their buffers without Ecology and local approval. _
During the visit, Rick observed that restoration efforts in the disturbed and filled wetlands
had either not started or were, thus far, unsuccessful. All Western Red Cedar (ThWa
plicara) trees that were planted in an effort to restore the cleared forested wetland appear to
have died Noxious weeds and invasive plants, including tansy ragwort (Senecto jacobea),
thistle (Cirsium sp.) and foxglove (Digitalis pwpurea), had begun colonizing the disturbed
wetland. In addition, work has not been completed to remove the unauthorized road,
constructed in wetlands.
Rick acknowledged your assertion that road removal had been hindered by wet conditions
and that you intended to remove the road as soon as possible. You noted that Mr. Rice was
prepared to start that work immediately. We agreed that water levels and soil conditions
were suitable to remove the road now. However, given other unauthorized work that you
recently conducted onsite, Ecology no longer has reasonable assurance that you can
conduct the restoration efforts in an ecologically sound manner. Do no further work in the
wetland or its regulatory buffer until so directed by this agency.
a
Timothy L. Wilkins
hme 3, 2016
Page 2
The approved Restoration Plan (Plan), dated December 2015, identifies and establishes a
110-foot buffer on the disturbed and offsite wetlands (p. 3 & Figure 2), which is consistent
with Ecology publications and the Jefferson County Critical Areas Ordinance.
During the visit, Rick observed that a large area of the wetland buffer, to the west of the -
wetland, had been newly logged and cleared. Brush piles and cut timber still remained in
the buffer. You stated that the site had been logged within the past ten days. This activity
is in violation of the terms of the AO, which prohibits you from undertaking regulated
activities (i.e., mechanized land cleating, etc.) within waters of the state or their restored
buffers on the subject property, except for restoration work (See page 5, Prohibition of
New Work within Waters of the State).
Rick noted that the wetland delineation flagging was still in place and tliat measurements
could be taken to determine how much of the buffer had been cleared. With Joel
Peterson's assistance, Rick measured the area of cleared buffer and found it to be
approximately 11,530 square feet. Rick also observed and counted 12 visible stumps in
the buffer that were recently cut. The stumps measured from approximately 13" diameter
to 30" diameter. It was noted that several large brush piles also remained in the buffer and
Rick could not determine whether additional stumps were located within the piles.
As a result of the buffer clearing, you will need to revise the restoration plan to include
restoration of the newly disturbed buffer. Buffer restoration must be supervised by a
qualified wetland specialist. The revised plan must be submitted to Ecology within 30
days of the date of this letter for our review and approval. -
During the visit, Rick also noted that containers of fuel and oil were being stored on the
unauthorized road and immediately adjacent to the wetland One of these containers,
which appeared to hold diesel fuel, was an open 5-gallon bucket. Improperly stored fuel
and oil can lead to unanticipated discharges..
Rick observed Mr. Rice's excavator parked to the west of the wetland, in the wetland
buffer. The excavator had fresh oil on the track and several spills spots were observed
beneath the blade attachment
In addition, Rick noted several small spills of fuel or oil on the surface of the unauthorized
road Small cloth shop towels were present in the spill areas. Also, a siphon hose, with
fuel leaking out of both ends, was observed on the ground and draining into the wetland.
Any discharge of pollutants to waters of the state, including wetlands is a violation of
RCW 90.48 and subject to enforcement action. Ecology's Spills Program staff will be
contacting you separately in regards to spill -related issues.
T®othy L. Wilkins
June 3, 2016
Page 3
Ecology shall determine its response to the violation of the AO in light of the facts and
applicable law. Any questions or correspondence regarding this letter should be directed to
Rick Mraz at (360) 407-6221.
Sincerely,
Perry J Lug Unit Manager
Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program
Southwest Regional Office
By Certified Mail 7014 0150 0000 9188 6947
cc: Sonia Wolfman, Attorney General's Office
- Dave Martin, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
David Goldsmith, Jefferson County Dept. of Community Development
Joel Peterson, Jefferson County Dept. of Community Development
Margie Bigelow, Washington Dept of Fish & Wildlife
Rick Mraz, PWS, Dept of Ecology
Kent' Carroll, Dept of Ecology
Andrea Unger, Dept. of Ecology
Appendix C. Jefferson County Department of Community Development
(DCD) Fence Permit #BLD15-00143
BUILDING PERMIT
Jefferson County Department of Community Development
621 Sheridan Street, Port Townsend, WA, 98368
(360)379-4450 FAX (360)379-4451
PERMIT #: BLD15-00143 Received Date: 424/2015
SITE ADDRESS: --- GYBE HO RD _ Issue Date 122/2016
Expiration Date 122/2017
OWNER: TIM WILKINS PHONE: 206-380-7345
10953 MADISON
BAINBRIDGE ISLAND WA 98110-3348
SUBDIVISION: Block: Lot:
PARCEL NUMBER: 921092007 Section: 9 Township: 29 N Range: 1E
CONTRACTOR: OW NER/BUILDER
PHONE:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
FENCE PERMIT
8X 2000 FT.
TYPE OF WORK
RES
SQUARE FOOTAGE:
TYPE OF IMP
NEW
VALUATION
10,000.00
MAIN: MAIN:
CODE :
2012
HEAT TYPE:
OCCUPANCY:
HEAT BASE:
HEAT TYPE:
OCCUPANCY:
UNHEATED:
# OF STORIES:
CONST TYPE:
OTHER:
GARAGE:
SHORELINE:
CONST TYPE:
DECK:
SETBACK:
SEWAGE DISPOSAL:
WATER SYSTEM:
BEDROOMS:
BATHROOMS:
Exist:
Exist:
Prop:
Prop:
Total:
Total:
Directions to Site:
BANK HEIGHT:
Amount Paid
By:
Date:
Receipt-
$157.00
SIRE
04/22115
154345
$102.05
SIRE
04/22/15
154345
N
$4.50
SRE
04/22/15
154345
$263.55
HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL REQUIRED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION
THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR ONE YEAR OR IT MUST BE PROPERLY RENEWED
BUILDING INSPECTION HOT-LINE 379.4465.
Request must be received by 3prn the day before the inspection is needed.
Office Hours 9:00 am - 4:30 pm MONDAY- THURSDAY
HOTLINE AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY
SPECIAL CONDITIONS APPLY - SEE ATTATCHED
Jefferson County Building Division Applicants WILKINS
BUILDING PERMIT INSPECTION APPROVALS Applicable Code: 2012 international BuildiTo ng Codes
he
befor
the
Requests received inspections, d after 00 iPM will not be scheduled for the-4455 no later than 0necttdays inspections inspection is needed.
ELECTRICAL PERMITS are issued by the Washington State Department of Labor & Industries.
The electrical permit must be signed off by the State Inspector prior to the County's Framing Inspection
inspection Item Date Approval Signature Notes
signed off by the final inspection will not be scheduled until the following
mpll et
ed and
Per
mit m t Complete for anV building
colnta n Department:
n9 plumbing
• Building permit Conditions are met
• Public Works Permit Final (where applicable
• Land Use Conditions met and signed off
FINAL INSPECTION
FINAL INSPECTION MUST THIS PERMIT IS VDALLIID OR ONES EAR INO BEING OCCUPIED
CONDITIONS for Building Permit g :BLD15.00143
.) DWJ
The project shall adhere to the Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control stormwater,
erosion and sediment during construction. BMPs shall address permanent measures to
stabilize soil exposed during construction, and in the design and operation of stormwater
and drainage control systems.
The site plan as submitted with the Building Permit application on August 31, 2015 has
been reviewed for consistency under the UDC, and has been approved by Jefferson
County Department of Community Development. Any modifications, changes, and/or
additions to the stamped, approved site plan dated January 15, 2016 shall be resubmitted
for review and approval by Jefferson County Department of Community Development.
.1 _ 11 ,,, n o......n ain,. mr 1/222016
STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS
L.� iJ1i;3 PL,A1 R=„- s.J
If APPROVED AS SUSFIJTT£7
❑ APPROVED AS NOTED
❑ REJECTED
Dzta 14, It Raviewer ,
FENCE
EXP. OPTE: OS / OS / 16
_ M-whad J. Anderson
PE & PLS No. 27665
330Ck.I.OSMI
Po t rmwr d,, WA 9083M
rEc r0 n!"
107 2 Mf
MICNAEU.ANDERSON
CrAE111101f ALsId S~r 330 Cl v.I S3
Pm[Towse" WA 98368
MEMO
DATE: August 31, 2015
TO: Jefferson County Community Development Department
Attention: David Johnson, Planning Department
�
FROM: Michael J. Anderson
PE & PLS 6
SUBJECT: Wilkim Application
BLD15-00143Lot 16
APN 921 092 007
Attached is a copy of the revised site plan for the proposed installation of the fence as shown.
The plan was changed to reflect the setback requirements for the on -site wetland areas that were
recently identified.
Please indicate if you need any additional information to continure Your review.
Attachments: 1
c: Tim Willdns, Owner
rp�,AG 3 '
trclsc. ;,
� N u/V,P-' �/G6
!!OA/ll
Zi 4 -?% %,C, Ce Z
49
M6
s 3--5;q
2157
S 88'05'53" E 665.51'
50 FT SETBACK GATE.
INSTALL CHAIN L K
FENCING/PLASTIC j
SCREENING (TYPICA ).
1, C PEDESTRIAN GATE
50 FT SETBACK
N 88'03'45" W
3 1/2' DIA. GALVANIZED
POST/ 8 FT HIGH
@ 8 FT SPACING
(TYPICAL)
665.55'
24' DIA, X 42' PCC-
�I
SECURITY FENCE
nsnE wM+' cuwwr
— M
N
(V
` N
i
m
I FC AL DESCRIPTION:
IUARTER OF THE
IUARTER OF THE
IUARTER OF THE
IUARTER OF SECTION 9,
TH, RANGE 1 WEST,
IAN.
?�JA
ROVE
Ac. E PLAt
IWNE N 15 2016
), WAS 9%�W..
. NO
R 1502
AREA:
... 1200
SFT
]
)..... 3820
SFT
.... 5020
FT
= 2.2%
EF
..... 41882
SF
M
AUG 3
L
AUG 3 1 2015
'EFIMN CftTv DC
—CHAIN LINK FENCING/ F�
PLASTIC SCREENING JMFIEnNur of o+o + —
(TYPICAL) neProreomrne
o w
a
ANDERSON `Lu
CIVIL ENGINEERS p a
Id
& SURVEYORS
'T TOWNSEND, WA 98368
t360) 531-1011
EV. DATE: 05 / 05 / 16
APRIL 21, 2015 Page 1 of 1
REV, AUG. 27, 2015
:p
0
m
nz
o_
CHAIN LINK FENCING
PLASTIC SCREENING
(TYPICAL)
EXP. DATE: 05 / 05 / 16
A `I
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
THE NORTH ONE/QUARTER OF
THE
SOUTHWEST ONE/QUARTER OF
THE
SOUTHWEST ONE/QUARTER OF
THE
NORTHWEST ONE/QUARTER OF
SECTION 9,
TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, RANGE 1
WEST,
WILLIAMETTE MERIDIAN.
APN 921 092 007
APPROVE
SITE AREA = 5.21 Ac.
t S'rm
PLAT'
PROPERTY OWNER:
TIM WILKINS
pN 15 2016
U
10953 MADISON
BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, WAS
9—
STRUCTURAL NO
WIND LOADING PER 1502
110 MPH
IMPERVIOUS AREA:
EX, GRAVEL ROAD........ 1200 SFT
REV]
NFW GRAVFI ROAD 3820 SFT
5020 FT AUG 3 12015
..... 4188
.2% $F EFFEleN CVTY
w
AUG 3
A AM 77 P Qf) < w o
CIVIL ENGINEERS o
& SURVEYORS a i
'T TOWNSEND, WA 98368
(360) 531-1011
APRIL 21, 2015 Page 1 of 1
REV, AUG. 27. 2015