HomeMy WebLinkAbout02 February
JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH
MINUTES
Monday, February 12,2001
Board Members:
Dan TitternesJ, Member - County CommisJioner DÙtrict # 1
Clen Huntingford, Member - County CommÙJioner DiJl1id #2
Richard Wqjt, Member - County CommÙsioner DÙtrict #3
Cer1frry MaJà, Member - Pori Town.rend Ci!y Counàl
. pll Buhler, Chairman - Hospital Commissione¡^ DÙtrid #2
Sheila Wl"e,fterman, Vice Chairman - Citizen at I...ßr;ge (City)
Roberta Frimll - Cïtizen at Larlf/ (Coun(yj
Staff Members:
~anBaUwm,1VHnmgSen;«~fDire(wr
Lat'?)' }-<qy, Ent'ironmental Healtb Diredor
Thomas Locke, MD, Health qlficer
Chairman Buhler called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. All Board and Staff members were present
with the exception of Commissioner Wojt and Member Masci.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Member Frissell noted that Commissioner Wojt did not attend the last meeting. On page one, paragraph
one, the last sentence should be deleted. In paragraph three, "Member Westerman seconded the motion
instead of Commissioner Wojt, noting that Commissioner Wojt was not in attendance." Commissioner
Huntingford moved to approve the minutes as corrected. Commissioner Titterness seconded the motion,
which carried by a unanimous vote.
Vice Chair Westerman requested that a discussion of the letter from Goodman Sanitation be added to the
agenda. Member Frissell also asked that a food handling class for members of volunteer organizations be
discussed.
OLD BUSINESS
Substance Abuse Treatment in Jails: Jean Baldwin agreed to provide a brief report next month
on current treatment in jails and the possibility of a liaison between the Substance Abuse Board and the
Board of HeaJth.
NEW BUSINESS
Community Health Indicators Follow-up: Jean Baldwin reported on the January 25th
workshop with Dr. Chris Hale, a summary of which was provided in the agenda packet. The workshop
was a success and met staff's goals for generating enthusiasm about the BRFSS Risk Survey and
reaching other interested data users. There were also discussions with Clallam County about a regional
approach. The partnerships that were developed exceeded expectations. The challenge will be to retain
the long-range vision while setting up a strong steering committee and data users group. The data users
HEALTH BOARD MINUTES - February 12,2000
Page: 2
group may include the County, WSU, OlyCAP, and OAAA Thc BRFSS information is available on the
Jefferson County web site and will be updated regularly. Dr. Hale will return in March and April to work
with subcommittees of law and justice and other agencies addressing issues involving seniors, families
with young children and youth 15 to 25.
In response to a question about how the $50,000 offered by the City would be used, Jean Baldwin said it
would buy certain additional elements in the BRFSS study needed to identify behavioral risk issues. A
steering committee will decide what information is needed and will also work with the data users group.
County Administrator Charles Saddler added that the goal is to use this data to develop policies that
would have a beneficial impact on jail populations.
Jean Baldwin reported that aside from $5,000 already budgeted for the Jefferson County Environmental
Health indicators, the Health Department also submitted a grant application to cover half of the BRFSS
costs. Additionally, the assessment data will demonstratc the need for Department of Corrections
treatment funding that will become available next year.
Vice Chair Westerman stressed the need for calendar coordination with hospital representatives before
future workshops are scheduled.
Jean Baldwin said it will be important to identify whom in the hospital is interested in looking at the
health indicator information and senior and youth issues. Dr. Tom Locke is the hospital liaison.
Report on Future of Rural Health Colloauium: A report was provided by Member Prissell on
the January 29th colloquium sponsored by the Washington Health Foundation. There were roughly 70
people in attendance representing 10 rural counties. She was particularly impressed with the keynote
speaker from the Center for Disease Control (CDC) who spoke on the concept of "social capital" and
showed how it is measured. During a discussion of what counties would most like to see within the next
3-5 years, most spoke in terms of crisis and survival. Many attendees voiced support for her comment
that she would like to see measurable improvement in the community's health, including improved
access to healthcare. At the meeting, the Washington Health Foundation announced that grants of up to
$50,000 are available for pilot projects to help communities with alternative healthcare financing
systems. She reviewed the grant criteria.
Dr. Tom Locke said that Jefferson County, through its joint board process, meets the criteria for
involvement in a demonstration project. He commented that while the healthcare situation is bad locally,
conditions are worse in other areas of the state. Statewide, trends are expected to continue downward.
Noting that modern problems are beyond the resources of any given entity, the CDC representative
suggested that the best solutions to complex health delivery problems come when communities work
together and pool resources. Modern problems are beyond the resources of any given entity.
Best Beeinnines Update: Jean Baldwin reminded the Board that David Olds will be presenting
his model for maternal child health in a work session on February 15th in Lacey.
HEALTH BOARD MINUTES - February 12,2000
Page: 3
After introducing Maternal Child Health Coordinator Carol Hardy, Jean Baldwin rcferenced the status
report, the purpose of which is to show the Board the many pieces connected with maternal child health,
to express interest in the Hawaii model, and to announce that funding is being pursued to provide a
menu of services. Child Protective Services wants to start a Hawaii Healthy Start program in conjunction
with the County's Best Beginnings and Maternity Support programs. Jefferson County is likely to
receive an Early Head Start grant which would cover ten families at 100% of the poverty level from
pregnancy through school-age and would serve all famiJies including Medicaid families.
Charles Saddler provided examples of how the Hawaii model was used in Florida to address issues of
domestic violence and the risk factors associated with juvenile delinquency, neglect and abuse. He
talked about some of the differences with the Hawaii model versus other models.
Jean Baldwin said the desire is to expand services to the whole community as opposed to just those who
qualify through maternity support or Medicaid. If the community can come up with funding, then more
families can be served.
Vice Chair Westerman expressed her support for these long-term programs and, at the same time,
acknowledged the difficulty in pursuing policy shifts because the results take so long to see.
Charles Saddler said the local community has to be willing to invest in social capital. Once the
community understands and prioritizes children's service issues, various models can be implemented.
He talked about a variety of funding mechanisms and the development of a coalition of community
leaders that helped support the model in Florida. It took a five-year commitment and the cost was
approximately $2,700 per year per family.
Jean Baldwin provided a brief overview of the components of the Washington First Steps programs that
help support home visits and case management. The cost savings are not necessarily reflected in the cost
center paying for the initial visits, but are seen in DSHS welfare and disability, schools, and juvenile
justice. While the infrastructure is in place to provide services, funding is not there to increase the
number served.
Lee:islative Uµdate: Dr. Locke reported that a huge budget crisis is looming. Most requests for
new spending are not expected to pass because there is not enough money for current programs. As
directed by the Board last month, he reviewed the priorities as outlined in a draft letter from the Board to
State Legislators: (1) rural health care access improvement, (2) maintain and/or enhance local public
health funding, and (3) continued support for Washington State Universal Vaccination Distribution
System. Absent from the list is tobacco use. Although the legislature set aside $100 million of the
tobacco settlement funds for health-related projects, it has only authorized spending $15 million dollars.
Legislative action is needed to authorize further spending. Washington is currently one of the few states
spending settlement dollars on health-related issues and there is stiff competition for health and non-
health programs.
Commissioner Huntingford asked if these funds were stable enough to use as a funding source for Basic
Health?
HEALTH BOARD MINUTES - February 12,2000
Page: 4
Dr. Locke said a sin tax is never a good funding source for health programs.
Vice Chair Westerman said she agrees with thc three priorities. She also agrees with Representative
Lynn Kessler who said that, given the growth in the state, legislators need to talk about lifting the 601 lid
or thcre will not be enough funds to support thesc programs. Shc proposed that a sentence be added to
the letter acknowledging that the legislators need to engage in a discussion about raising that lid.
Commissioner Huntingford said he agrees that if you are going to send a letter outlining spending
priorities, you need to offer a funding solution. It is also important at the local and state level to
prioritize programs and consider areas where cuts can be made. He rarely sees programs being cut.
Dr. Locke said many health advocacy groups support lifting the 601 limit specifically for health issues.
The rate of increase in the health sector is much higher than the annual percentage allowed by 601 and is
driven by factors that do not relate to inefficiency, but technology and the aging of the population. Both
demands and options are increasing.
The Board approved the letter with an addition to the first sentence in the last paragraph "and that the
legislature needs to engage in a discussion about raising the 1-601 limits to address these important
health issues."
Dr. Locke pointed out that HB 1742, the text of which was included in the agenda packet, is the bill
referred to in the letter.
Policy on Review of Buildine Permit Applications: Larry Fay reviewed that last month, the
Board discussed the policy designed to implement provisions of the new regulations that says when you
apply for a building permit, you need to meet current code. The policy has not yet been reworked, but
the two situations discussed were: (1) when a septic system is in the ground and an owner is ready to
build and (2) when someone has an existing system and they want to remodel. With the second situation,
Member Masci suggested staff sit in on City discussions about Smart Code to see whether that approach
might help develop a policy for triggering when building upgrades are required. Instead of using a
straight formula from the UBC to determine the threshold for compliance with everything, there may be
a matrix with gray areas to help make those judgment decisions. Staff still feels that the compliance
decision will be linked to the building permit so there is a uniform expectation, but a similar decision
matrix may be able to be incorporated.
Linda Atkins reported that the City has hired two consultants to review a range of commonly-confronted
issues related to remodels, construction and destruction. The City will be addressing certain areas of the
building code and evaluating and comparing language of other codes used in situations to come up with
a matrix showing thresholds and then offering choices and timelines. Smart Code primarily applies to
historical buildings. The compliance threshold was typically an increase of 50 percent of the assessed
value or 50 percent of the square footage of the roof. On February 26, the City will look at 12 issues to
see how Smart Code would be applied and then look for specific projects where these options could be
tested. County staff will bring back information and see if there are applications for septic system
compliance.
HEALTH BOARD MINUTES - February 12,2000
Page: 5
Charles Saddler added that this would be yet another code that the building official might utilize. If it is
a new structure, they would use the building code. If it is a retrofit of an existing structure, then they
might decide to use the Smart Code. There is a question of liability, however, if the code allows for
interpretive decisions.
Commissioner Titterness said it is often necessary for the applicant to read the code and then find the
exceptions. Typically, the enforcing official will not provide the exceptions for the applicant.
Commissioner Titterness understands the UBC is going to be superceded by a combination code and
adopted at the state level. He believes it is worth considering whether DOH can take the risk to adopt
less restrictive codes in building or give approval for new technologies and then push the state to move
in that direction.
Larry Fay said we may not be able to change the building code, but we could generate ideas that help
DOH implement the regulations in logical ways and in a way which most people can understand and
accept. The goal is to reach an interpretation which is more flexible than one which says that at a certain
point an owner must upgrade everything. He reviewed what other jurisdictions are doing in
interpretation of the state code.
Linda Atkins said knowing the associated risk in particular areas is also a factor, such as high water
tables or less populated areas where it is not a public health issue. More aggressive programs exist
around the Puget Sound.
Commissioner Huntingford said the County Commissioners discussed at length the issue of systems that
are in the ground but no longer meet current code. He sees the need for a mandated site inspection to
ensure a system is working before a sale takes place, but expressed concern about the need to meet
current code even though a system may be working.
Larry Fay said some people on the advisory committee believe that if it does not meet code, you replace
it. He said we are conducting the sale inspections purely to determine whether the system is functioning
-- meeting code is not the issue. If you are applying for a building permit, that is another issue.
Upon the suggestion that the Department give owners a warning of problems, Linda Atkins said with
every evaluation of existing systems, she or any other staff make a concerted effort to help the owner
understand the situation with which they are faced.
Food Handline Class: Member Frissell said she has spoken with Susan Porto about a food
handling class for volunteer organizations. Ms. Porto suggested notifying volunteer organizations that a
class will be available. It would not be the same class as for a food handler's permit but, rather, food
safety education information for non-permitted activities.
HEALTH BOARD MINUTES - February 12, 2000
Page: 6
AGENDA CALENDAR/ ADJOURN
Future Planning Topics: Review of Goodman Sanitation Letter and Discussion of Food
Handling Class. Update on Building Permit Applications and the Internal Assessment Report and
Recommendations.
2001 AGENDA ITEMS
1. CONTINUED STABLE FUNDING TO REPLACE MVET
2. ACCESS HEALTH CARE
3. PROGRAM MEASURES (Genetic Research and Public Health Implications)
4. METHAMPHETAMINE SUMMIT
5. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS & COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT
6. TOBACCO PREVENTION AND COALITION
7. FLUORIDE
8. TRANSIT AND PUBLIC HOUSING
9. BIOTERRORISM READINESS & PLAN
10. AGING POPULATION
11. WATER
12. MATERNAL CHILD PREVENTION GOALS (0-3)
Meeting adjourned at 4:05 p.m. The next meeting will be held on Thursday, March 15,2001 at 2:30 p.m.
JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH
fj¿¡JÔ-- . ).'
" :/ I
. t..-(.{/I__..
r Buh~er, Chairman
Sw ltJ-.. ~te) (~/ v~-'v~
Sheila Westerman, Vic C! irman
(Excused Absence)
Geoffrey Masci, Member
(Excused Absence)
Richard Wojt, Member
/L?'¡ilti:f1~~(!
Roberta Frissell, Member
JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH
Monday, February 12,2001
2:00 - 4:00 PM
Main Conference Room
Jefferson County Health and Human Services
AGENDA
I. Approval of Minutes of Meeting of January 18,2001
II. Public Comments
III. Old Business
IV. New Business
1. Community Health Indicators Follow-up
2. Best Beginnings Update
3. Report on Future of Rural Health Colloquium
Jean (30 min)
Jean (30 min)
TomIRoberta
(15 min)
Tom (10 min)
Linda A (20 min)
4. Legislative Update
5. Policy Relating to Building Permit Applications
V. Adjourn
Next Meetin2: March 15, 2001
t
JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH
.:1 MINUTES
Otl~'t- Thursday,]anuary 18,2001
Board ¡vlembers:
Dan Harpole, Member - COJII1!Y CommifJioner District #1
Glen Huntintford, Member - CounD' CommiJ"Jioncr DÙtriti #2
Richard ¡,Fqjt. Member - COlli:!)' Commirjjoner District #3
GeojJ7"0' Ma.rá, Member - Port Townsend City COlll1âl
Jill Buhler. J,"ice-Chairman - Hospital CommisJioner Distri.t #2
S hei/a Jr-'Úterman, Citizen at urge (Ci!J)
RobeT1a Fri.mll. Cbai17J1an. Citizen at Large (CoNn!))
StafMembers:
Jean Baldwin, NHrsillg Sm'kes Director
Larry Far, Environmental Health Dimior
Thon;as Locke. MD, Health OJficer
DRA.Fr
Chairman Frissell called the meeting to order at 2:30 p.m. All Board and Staff members were present
with the exception of Vice Chairman Buhler. Commissioner Wojt arrived shortly after the meeting
began.
ELECTION OF 2001 CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR
Member Westerman moved to elect Member Buhler as Chairman. Member Masci seconded the motion,
which carried by a unanimous vote. Member Masci moved to elect Member Westerman as Vice
Chairman. Member Frissell seconded the motion, which carried by a unanimous vote.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Member Frissell noted that at the top of page two, second sentence, cr increasing income tax" should be
changed to "establishing an income tax. " Member Masci moved to approve the minutes as corrected.
Commissioner Wojt seconded the motion, which carried by a unanimous vote.
OLD BUSINESS
Internal Assessment Report: Dr. Tom Locke distributed copies of the Health and Human
Services Internal Assessment Report, which the County Commissioners received yesterday. He
commented that useful information was generated from the assessment and the raw data can be used as a
baseline for future assessments. He thanked Chairman Frissell for her assistance with the survey.
NEW BUSINESS
2000-2001 Influenza Season Update: Jean Baldwin introduced Public Health Nurse Jane Kurata,
who is in charge of immunizations. Ms. Kurata reported that due to production problems the target age for
the vaccine was increased to 55. Although there were delays in receiving the vaccination and clinics were
rescheduled, the Health Department eventually received 1,300 doses, of which about 40 remain.
~
,
HEALTH BOARD MINUTES - January 18,2001
Page: 2
Member Masci asked what number of the population was being targeted as "at-risk?"
Jean Baldwin said she would try to provide these figures by the January 25 Workshop.
Child Health Profile Implementation in Jefferson County: Communicable Disease and
Immunization Program Coordinator Lisa McKenzie explained that the two main components of Child
Health Profile are the health promotion materials and the immunization registry. This information is
derived from the database of birth certificate information. She reported that King, Pierce and Snohomish
Counties have been using the registry for five years, but the Peninsula has yet to participate. The
expense of this service is often a deterrent for rural health departments and local physicians. A two-year
trial period is being offered in which subscribing providers get access to a statewide immunization
registry at no cost. State and local jurisdictions are interested in the registry to ensure children are not
over-immunized due to lost records, to quickly identify those not immunized during a disease outbreak,
to target under-immunized areas, and measure immunization rates.
Jean Baldwin said the Health Department has signed up for the free two-year trial period. Information
taken from Medicaid records show that, 31.5% of children under age six are already in Jefferson
County's database. The Health Department has budgeted for a clerical support person to assist local
physicians by entering four or five years of data into the system. The governor's budget includes an
additional $2 million for Child Health Profile. Staff will continue to move forward with this project as a
priority.
Substance Abuse Treatment in .Jails - Public Health Issues: Dr. Locke said this item was
suggested by Commissioner Tittemess to better understand the long-range public health implications of
incarcerating people without intervention or treatment. Dr. Locke said this has been a big public health
issue for some time. He pointed to the two drugs that have the most widespread adverse effect - tobacco
and alcohol. The combination of those two account for 500,000 preventable deaths per year compared
with 20,000 for all illegal drugs combined. The issue of treatment for drug addiction in County jails is
one that overlaps jurisdictional boundaries (Le., Sheriff's Department, County Commissioners, and
Health Departments). The report from the Department of Justice provided in the agenda packet is
reflective of the situation in Washington State, where 70% of inmates are either addicted to one or more
substances or are incarcerated because of a drug-related offense, or both. Drug addiction is not their only
health problem, but is a contributing factor in their incarceration. Despite this fact, very few get treated
for their addiction while incarcerated (roughly 10%) and a very high percentage of addicts will return to
their primary addiction once released. The report also indicates that drug use while incarcerated is not a
rare phenomenon.
Member Masci pointed out that the report did not mention the number of staff arrested for providing drugs
to inmates.
Vice Chairman Westerman mentioned California's recent initiative guaranteeing treatment for first and,
in some cases, second-time offenders. With law and justice using an increasing amount of the state and
local budgets, she asked if it is time for Health Boards to take action toward treatment? One of the
reasons she supported expanding the Board of Health was to provide a forum to address issues that may
HEALTH BOARD MINUTES - January 18,2001
Page: 3
be too controversial for elected officials to take on alone.
Jean Baldwin said the Health Department does not want to compete with Mental Health for funding in
finding a solution to these problems. She suggested the Health Board assist the Substance Abuse Board
by setting a vision and standards. That Board, by statute, is required to be configured with a high
percentage of people in recovery and is also charged with helping the Commissioners layout a vision for
disbursing funds.
Member Masci asked if it would be helpful to appoint a Substance Abuse Board liaison with the Board
of Health?
County Administrator Charles Saddler talked about the County's development of a Health and Human
Services Advisory Committee to look at the human condition and perhaps create subcommittees to take
on certain tasks or responsibilities such as Substance Abuse. A task force comprised of the Health and
Human Services Committee and the Law and Justice Council could address methamphetamine, a
problem which is consuming more and more resources outside of health, law and justice.
Member Masci suggested that this committee include a representative from the City.
Vice Chairman Westerman said she supports the objective of broadening people's vision. She is
concerned that current Boards would be disbanded. As a long-time Developmental Disabilities Board
Member, she hopes Board members continue to have a place to provide their input and expertise.
When asked if the Board of Health has a recommendation to begin addressing the issues in the jails, Dr.
Locke responded that the role of Public Health is in keeping track of the statistics and pointing out that
addiction is a disease for which there are effective treatments if they are, in fact, utilized. He added that,
under state law, the human service component is the responsibility of the Board of County
Commissioners, not the Board of Health.
Member Masci asked whether there could be mandatory drug testing of inmates entering the jail system,
so that there could be a focused effort on drug addiction?
Charles Saddler suggested that the Board of Health, as a neutral party, could be the arbitrator of effective
treatment methods. While the Sheriff would like to see an in-jail drug treatment program, there is a great
deal of resistance from others in law enforcement.
Jean Baldwin agreed to ask Dick Gunderson, Substance Abuse Coordinator of DASA whether anybody
is doing treatment in jails.
Charles Saddler said the County has a stable jail population with recurring offenders. Opportunities for
intervention, even late in the game, may prevent re-entering or the next generation from entering the
criminaljustice system at all. While it may not be prevention in the truest sense of the word, it has the
potential to have a significant preventive element.
While the Board did not regard this topic as an action item, there was interest in further discussion about
"
HEALTH BOARD MINUTES - January 18,2001
Page: 4
possible additional requirements or mandatory testing.
Dr. Locke said that a fairly complex body of law already exists that specifies what testing is permissible
(such as for TB) and what is sometimes permissible (such as HIV).
Legislative Update - Meeting With 24th Legislative District Representatives: As requested
by the Board at the last meeting, Dr. Locke said he and Member Buhler inquired about the possibility of
a meeting with legislators in February. Jefferson General, the Clallam Board of Health, and several other
agencies also expressed interest. However, the legislators are each offering different alternatives to a
meeting. Representatives Buck and Hargrove are going to be attending a State Hospital Association
meeting. Representative Buck offered to do a telelink with the Olympic Medical Center. Representative
Lynn Kessler has agreed to come to Port Angeles and participate in a town hall meeting, Saturday,
February 10 or 17, part of which could be devoted to health issues. It is hoped that if a town hall meeting
is scheduled that Senators Buck and Hargrove will also attend.
\
Dr. Locke asked that the Commissioners provide encouragement for these meetings. He sees a benefit to
having a health-related meeting where not only Boards of Health and Hospital Commissioners, but
medical providers and healthcare workers can tell their stories. He is convinced that the health care crisis
has finally hit Jefferson and Clallam Counties.
Member Masci said he believes that a clearly-articulated position needs to first be outlined. Legislators
know that each group is going to ask for more money.
The Board agreed that a letter be written to legislators listing Jefferson County's priority issues and
presenting ideas for what legislators can do to maintain or improve access.
Jean Baldwin mentioned that her priorities for the Rural Health Summit would be MVET replacement
and additional child health tracking. She will let the Board know whether Representative Kegy was
going to ask for the Olds project to be replicated in more Counties or at least continue the funding for the
four Counties that are currently participating.
Dr. Locke suggested focusing on three key areas: (1) no additional cuts to Medicaid funding, (2)
alternatives for health care, and (3) public health funding, which he believes includes the areas Jean
Baldwin mentioned. He agreed to work on drafting a letter with assistance from Member Buhler and will
circulate an initial draft to the Board.
Commissioner Huntingford said he received an emaiI about further cuts in mental health, which will be
discussed at the Steering Committee meeting tomorrow. He will try to find out more information and
provide an update to Jean Baldwin.
Policv on Design Standards For Site-constructed Elevated Fixed Media Filter Vessels:
Larry Fay pointed out that the draft policy statement included in the agenda packet has not been
modified since the last meeting. Although no written material is available for today's discussion,
industry representatives for pressure treated lumber have confirmed there are specifications for different
HEALTH BOARD MINUTES - January 18.2001
Page: 5
kinds of exposures. The engineer would be able to specify what kind of materials they are using to
construct the vessels. The draft policy was reviewed by an engineering firm. designers. and a statewide
committee and indicated that the language is clear. It appears that as a result of the case in Jefferson
County, Glendon Technology is working to change their business practices, moving to a modular kit
with standardized materials, with which their distributors are required to work.
Member Masci moved to approve the Fixed Media Filter Vesse! Policy as submitted. Commissioner
Huntingford seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous vote.
Policv on Review of Buildim! Permit Applications - Second Draft: Larry Fay noted that the
policy statement provided in the agenda packet incorporated changes resulting from the last meeting. He
then distributed another version of the policy, which is basically the same, however it reflects staff's
recommended changes. The new ordinance has two provisions in different sections that deal with
inspections of on-site systems for when a building permit application is submitted.
Under Applicability, if the system is currently in the inspection program and up-to-date with inspections,
a building permit application inspection would not be needed. A second tier of inspection applies to
building permit applications that are either for new construction that involve plumbing or an expansion
of use. This policy is written so that it applies to any new construction, remodel or addition. What he is
proposing is that this policy apply to any site that has an on·site sewage system in the ground, whether it
be a new construction or additions/remodels that are expansions.
In an expansion that significantly changes the house so that it affects sewage flows and the potential
performance and reliability of that system, it is proposed that the permit be tied to the building code.
When the work of remodeling the house is equivalent to some percentage of the assessed value of the
property, the whole building will need to be brought up to code. In other words, when the building
official requires a complete upgrade of a house the septic system would be included.
Member Masci invited Larry Fay to the next City's Smart Code committee meeting January. The City
has received a state grant to explore Smart Coding and he believes the County may be able to use the
method by showing on a matrix the combination of things that trigger septic compliance.
Commissioner Huntingford would like to know more about the threshold in the building code. He asked
at what point does that building permit trigger new compliance standards? He is concerned that property
owners with septic systems approved by the County under the code of that period, will now be required
to upgrade their systems. Some lots may no longer be buildable under the current code.
Vice Chairman Westerman said when you buy property, there is a risk that you may be able to build on
the property and you may not. You cannot always allow citizens to operate their systems under 20 and
30-year old regulations.
Member Frissell said the Board has to be concerned about the health issues associated with these systems.
Commissioner Huntingford said he questions the prosecutor's interpretation of what the state law
requires. While he does not want to see property owners having problems with their well, for instance,
·
HEALTH BOARD MINUTES - January 18,2001
Page: 6
there may be other options available to them such as moving their well. He is not aware of health issues
with systems approved in the early 1980s.
Larry Fay provided a recent example of a property owner that installed two septic systems and had two
mobile homes on the property. At some point, they removed one home and then recently applied to add
another mobile home using the old system. Because of the density on that particular site, there may not
have been an immediate environmental or health problem, but the system is not functioning up to current
code since it is discharging septic effluent into that shallow water table. There will be situations where
currently unused fields would not perform in accordance with modern standards.
The policy stipulates that when the County determines there is the adequate 3 feet of vertical separation,
etc., the owner is required to establish a reserve area to proceed with a building permit application. If
there is between three feet and one foot of vertical separation, the system can still be used, but instead of
being on a 3- or 6-year monitoring schedule, the system is placed on a I-year monitoring schedule. The
concern being that with the reduced vertical separation, failure is of a higher consequence. An upgrade
would be requested when a system is 12 inches or less from a water table. Even then, the owner can still
use the drain field, but a treatment standard will be added in front of the drain field so effluent is treated
before leaving the system.
Commissioner Huntingford asked about elimination of wording on pg. 3, item 4, "owner may install
curtain drain or make other site improvement and keep monitoring. "
Larry Fay agreed to follow up on this item. If there is a site that is logical for a curtain drain and there is
a place to discharge that does not interfere with anything, it ought to be an option to improve the
system's performance. He said it is allowed in the on-site sewage code.
Larry Fay said if a septic system was installed sometime after 1987 and the owner submitted the
building permit applications consistent with the terms and conditions of that permit, enough information
is available and the standards have not changed, that it is likely the permit would be approved. However,
between 1983 and 1987, the Board of Health indicated to the public that if a septic system was in the
ground you would be able to build. While a reserve area will need to be designated, it will not be a big
problem until the lot in question is small enough where there cannot be both a reserve area and a place to
build a house.
Commissioner Tittemess said in that situation, there has to be a contingency for them to agree to an
alternative system of some kind, should their system fail.
Larry Fay said situations where there is no reserve area would be candidates for pretreatment to provide
high-quality effluent in the drain field and make such failure improbable. In the case of a sand filter or a
package treatment plan, it would provide a repairable component if failure did occur.
Vice Chairman Westerman commented that this seems to be a reasonable response.
Member Masci said because there are always going to be gray areas he would like to see a regulatory
structure that included a customer service component. He suggested that a grid of priority mitigation
HEALTH BOARD MINUTES - January 18,2001
Page: 7
responses be developed.
Larry Fay said the biggest challenge is preserving water quality and balancing real and perceived
expectations. Differentiating between a real health problem and a problem with design standards is often
a judgment call. Applications submitted before this policy is in place will be dealt with on a case-by-case .
basis. If someone had a septic permit and the system was installed and permitted for a 3-bedroom
sometime between 1983 forward. it is fairly predictable that they are going to use that system and build a
house. However. if there is no reserve area. an alternative system needs to be considered.
Commissioner Huntingford suggested the O&M program offers safeguards.
Larry Fay said while the O&M program will pick up the kind of failures where there is effluent running
across the surface of the ground, it will not uncover the treatment failures in the soil. The concern is
where there is not vertical separation and untreated effluent is moving through the shallow water table
and showing up 100 or 200 feet away from the drain field in an untested area and feeding into some of
the other tributaries. A system may drain for 10 years, but what is happening in the soil is also a concern.
Member Masci asked if it is possible to create the policy and then educate the real estate community that
septic tank inspection is a contingency of the sale.
Charles Saddler said this is occurring, but the County needs to come up with a more comprehensive,
more formalized process because of the entire Unified Development Code (UDC).
Larry Fay summarized that while he believes the Department can deal with the 1983 permits and small
lots and vertical separation, he does not yet have clear direction on a 3-bedroom septic system
irrespective of when those applications are made.
Commissioner Huntingford asked staff to find out how many old permits are still on the books.
Larry Fay responded that is difficult unless someone reviewed the files to see if there was a )uilding
permit issued or go through the Assessor's records and see if there is a building on the property.
Commissioner Titterness said while he guesses there are not many systems from that period, there needs
to be consistency. At the time the owner requests a permit, it is our responsibility to let them know of
potential problems for which they will be responsible. He asked if something that accomplishes a
perimeter check on those few systems could be added to the annual inspection?
Larry Fay said site-specific ground water sampling is challenging at best and would not provide water
quality information that could be counted on to determine a failure. The question is what do we do if
there is 12 inches or less of vertical separation?
Commissioner Titterness said he believes a permit would still be issued. In the annual inspection, if
there are signs of failing, you make it clear to the owners that an advanced system was recommended.
HEALTH BOARD MINUTES - January 18,2001
Page: 8
AGENDA CALENDAR/ADJOURN
FUTURE PLANNING TOPICS: Update on Building Permit Applications and the Internal Assessment
Report and Recommendations.
1. CONTINUED STABLE FUNDING TO REPLACE MVET
,., ACCESS HEALTH CARE
3. PROGRAM MEASURES (Genetic Research and Public Health Implications)
4. METHAMPHETAMINE SUMMIT
5. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS & COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT
6. TOBACCO PREVENTION AND COALITION
7. FLUORIDE
8. TRANSIT AND PUBLIC HOUSING
9. BIOTERRORISM READINESS & PlAN
10. AGING POPUlATION
11. WATER
12. MATERNAL CHILD PREVENTION GOALS (0·3)
Meeting adjourned at 4:30 p.m. Due to a lack of a quorum the next meeting will be held on MONDAY,
FEBRUARY 12,2001 AT 2:00-4:00 P.M.
JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH
(Excused Absence)
Jill Buhler, Chairman
Geoffrey Masci, Member
Sheila Westerman, Vice·Chairman
Richard Wojt, Member
Glen Huntingford, Member
Roberta Frissell, Member
Dan Tittemess, Member
Board of Health
Follow-up Report of January 25th and 26th
Jefferson County Health & Human Services Looks At
County Health Indicators
Dr. Chri" flak. of Hale Associates. joined us on January 25/11 and revÎe\ved health indicators from vital
records. other health indicators and demography. Dr. I-laic provided energy and excitement while the
community looked at somewhat overwhelming numbers. The numbers became stories as they were
revÎc\\ed. ¡'or those of you unable to attend, I have enclosed a copy of the agenda. the data and
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS) sheet. The current data is available for the
cnmlllUI1 i ty atIJJt.¡;¡:.//.W..\ðCt£. co. iefferson. wa. us/Ilea ¡tll/ defa u It. htm
The general consensus of the meeting is that participants want rei iable assessment data.
· There is great interest in the BRFSS that will happen in Jefferson County throughout 200 I.
· There is interest in other data that is not compiled and possibly not easily available
· There is also interest in continuing partnership to improve the accuracy of data - Olycap came
tÓnvard at the training and said that they would like to partner and gather data
· Tlh: city or Port Townsend will provide $50,000 funding over two years to review the social law
andj Llsticc issues that result in incarceration or juvenile j usticc system services. Existing data
\\iJI he analyzed and new data gathered so that coherent science based policy development and
program recommendations can be available. JCHHS will enhance their contract with Dr. Hale tor
thi" data analysis. program research and recommendations.
Illese partnerships exceeded the expectation or the statf in bcginning this project. As policy makers.
,\PLI. rhL' Bpard or Health. must look at assessment data to determine priorities. Dr. Hale and JCHHS
\\ ill h:\ \e d s....ri L'S 0 r quarterly meetings that special ize in topics of substance aouse, law and justice.
hirth [(I dge II\e. school age. youth 15 to 24. aging adults and 70 + years and service needs. Short
llIanl'rh !11eL'lÎngs \vill run two hOLlrs at WSU. Thc challcngc will be to invite the number ofpeoplc
\\110 arl' !11pst likely to be interested. An e-mail list \vill hc established and we will send out reports to
l'\....ryP1J<.· 1\ w attcnded. as \vell as those who \vcre invited.
Jefferson Count.Y Communít.Y Health Jndícators Meetíng
W SU Spruce Koom
Januar'y 25,200 I
AGENDA
Dr. Tom Locke- Assessment shapes good decisions
Dr. Chris Hale - Overview
· What do we know about data in Jefferson County?
· Economic Data
· Health Indicators
· Birth
· Death
· Communicable Diseases
· Quality of Life
· Quality of Life
Discussions:
Families & Young Children
Youth 15 to 25
Adults 25 - 64
Seniors
Environmental Health
Tobacco I Substance Abuse
Defining the gaps I What would we like to know?
· What is the Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance Survey?
o When is it coming?
o What is available?
o Who uses it?
o Morbidity
· Upcoming Census Data
Break to review data
Where do we gal How do we track 'NtIat is important to Jefferson County citizens?
· Build partnerships - County wide I Regional data users groupl web sites
· Establish committee that is a clearinghouse of quality
i>....· ·.·..··....·...···.··..2001
Behaviora.··..·.···.·..··.··.·..I.·......... R1sk>F.·......·~.a.··.·.. ctÔ.·...·.i·Surveillance
. " "",'" ",'"
S.$teIÍ1Questionnaire
In troducti on ......... .............................. ........................................................................... iii
CDC CORE QUES TIONS ............................. .................. ..... ... ..................................1
Section I: Health Status............ .......... ...... ........................................ ...................... ......... 1
Section 2: Health Care Access (& CDC Optional Module).............................................2
Section 3: Exercise..... ............................ .................... ...................................................... 4
Section 4: Hypertension Awareness......................... ....................................................... 4
Section 5: Cholesterol Awareness............. ....................................................................... 4
Section 6: Asthma..................................................... ....................................................... 5
Section 7: Diabetes (& CDC Optional Module) ..............................................................6
Section 8: Arthritis..................................................... ......................................................9
Section 9: Immunization (& Washington State-Added Questions) ...............................10
Section 10: Tobacco Use ................................................................................................11
Section 11; Alcohol Consumption.......................................................................... ........ 12
Section 12: Firearms................................ ...... .............. ................................................... 12
Section 13: Demographics ...... .................. ............... ....................................................... 13
Section 14; Disability....... ......................... ...................................................................... 18
Section 15; Physical Activity (& Washington State-Added Questions)......................... 18
Secti on 16; Prostate Cancer Screening.... ........ ......... ................................................ ...... 21
Secti on 1 7: Colorectal Cancer Screening........................................................................ 23
Sect i on 18: HIV I AIDS.................................................................................................... 24
WASHINGTON STATE-ADDED QUESTIONS .............................................27
Section 19: Health Care Coverage and Use ....................................................................27
Secti on 20: Unmet Health Care Needs........................................................................... 28
Secti on 21: Oral Health............ ......... ......... ..................................................................... 29
Secti on 22: Asthma History............................................................................................ 31
Section 23: Cardiovascular Disease................................................................................ 34
Section 24 : Tobacco Indicators............................... ........................................................ 3 7
Section 25: Other Tobacco Products............................................................................... 39
Section 26; F ami ly Planning........................................................................................... 39
Section 27: Family Violence........................... ..... ........ .... .......... ..... ...... ......... ....... ....... ...43
WA 2001 BRFSS December 15 2000
12.14.2000
State of
Washington
HOllsc of
RepreSentatives
January 31,2001
RECEIVED
FE B 0 5 2001
Jefferson County
Health & Human Services
Jean Baldwin
615 Sheridan
Port Townsend, W A 98368
Dear Jean,
The House Health Care, House Children and Family Services, Senate Health Care, and Senate
Human Services and Corrections Committees will be holding a joint work session on home
visiting on February 15th. We would like to invite your project, along with the three other
projects around the state, to make a brief presentation before committee members.
David Olds will present for the first half hour. Then, the legislative committees would like to
hear ITom the four pilot programs implementing his model about the families they serve and how
the individual programs operate. It would be wonderful if you or a representative of your project
could speak for 2-3 minutes. We will also have a brief presentation fÌ'om WCPCAN on
community-based home visiting. We will then open the session up for questions and discussion.
The work session will take place fÌ'om 12-1pm on February 15th in House Hearing Room A of the
John L. O'Brien Building. Please let us know if someone fÌ'om your project will be able to speak
for a few minutes. We look forward to hearing ftom you.
Sincerely,
/z~
~
Ruth Kagi
Co- Vice Chair,
House Children & Family Services Committee
Shay Schual-Berke, M.D.
Co- Vice Chair,
House Health Care Committee
Memorandum
Date:
To:
From:
Cc:
RE:
February 6. 200 I
Board of Health & County Commissioners
Jean Baldwin / Carol Hardy
Bill NeSmith. Jude McClure, CharJes Saddler
Update
Jefferson County Report on Maternal Child Health Year 11
History
The goal of the Washington State First Steps program, authorized by the Federal Maternity
Aecess act of 1989. was to provide "matemity care necessary to ensure healthy birth outcomes
for low-moderate income families". The legislation called for removal of unnecessary barriers to
receiving prenatal care and provided for increased access to care and expanded Medicaid
services for these pregnant women.
The First Steps Program includes the following components:
· Expanded Medicaid eligibility to 185% of the federal poverty level for pregnant/postpartum
women and intànts less than one year old (a íàmily of three. mom, dad and unbom child,
can make $2182.00 per month or $26,168.00 per year).
· Provided Maternity Support Services (MSS) during pregnancy and two months
postpartum by a multidisciplinary team consisting of a Public Health Nurse. Social Worker
and Nutritionist. These 10 visits werc to be provided by an approved agency and consisted
of home and/or oftice visits.
· Maternity Case Management (MC\1) during pregnancy and for one year postpartum for
the women in MSS \vho were identiíied as high-risk for poor outcomes (specific high-risk
criteria \vas designated by the state. see Attachment A). Increased the number of MSS
visits for MCM designated clients to 20 visits for the pregnancy and two months
postpartum.
Jefferson County Health and Human Services began to otfcr these programs in January of 1990.
Referral to this program is made by all of the local OR/GYN family practice doctors. other
clinics, nurse practitioners/midwives. DSHS welÜ1re office. tàmily planning, WIC, The Life
Center, Jefferson GenerallIospital. the school counselors and \vord of mouth. Over the last
eleven years Jefferson County Health and Human Services has worked very hard at building
relationships in order to receive the referrals for all pregnant "vomen who qualify for Medicaid.
In 1997 Jefferson County had 201 births and 104 were Medicaid reimbursed (see Attachment
B). Of the JetTerson County pregnant women Medicaid reimbursed, MSS/MCM program was
providing services to 8sr~;), second in the state. The state average is about 65% of the Medicaid
reimbursed births (see Attachment C).
Jefferson Count)' Health and Human Services Maternal Child Services
Maternit)' Support Services (MSS) is offered to any medicaid eligible pregnant woman.
Serviœs include 10 visits for assessment. education and consultation provided by an
interdisciplinary team of professionals boom each of the three disciplines of Public Health
Nursing. Nutrition and Psychosocial Services. It can also be provided by a community health
\vorker under supervision. These services also include development. implementation and
evaluation of plans of care tar pregnant women and their infants up to t\VO months postpartum.
The intent of the program is to provide MSS interventions as early in a pregnancy as possible in
an eff'ort to promote positive birth and parenting outcomes.
MCM is offered to MSS clients who meet the state high-risk criteria (see Attachment A) who
request services: it is also voluntary. The services arc the same as in MSS. however, more
intensive and a caseworker is chosen for each woman. The woman is allowed 20 prenatal and
two I110nths postpartum visits rather than 10 and can be followed until the iníànt is I year old.
Best Beginnings (B8). the Dr. David Olds Project replication project began in Jefferson County
in July of 1999 with three nurses attending a weeklong training in Denver, Colorado. This
project wi II continue for at least three years along with the other three counties that make up thc
Washington State Consortium in collaboration with the University of Washington. University
of Washington currently gathers the data tì'om the four consortium sites in Washington that are
implementing this program, and sends the data to the University of Colorado where the data is
analyzed for types of visit, acuity of maternal and infant mental health, tobacco use,
demographics. parenting risks, environmental health and substance use, as well as other risks.
The data is also being analyzed in relation to the "íidelity" to the original research protocols. At
some point, we arc hoping to provide the same services without the University providing
sLlpcrvïslÜn.
A major focus of thc BB project is a local attempt to decrease the number of families in the
child protective service system. Dr. Olds' research. based on the combination of brain
development. attachment theory and object relations theory. has documented decreases in court
involvement substance abuse inÜmt and child injuries. Therefore the long-term intervention is
striving fÌJr long-term generational changes in self-competency. family dynamics and parenting
style. Since the first pregnancy in a woman's life otTers a unique opportunity for change. it is
the first time mothers that come tì'om backgrounds at risk or from tàmilies at risk that we are
targeting for the BB intensive series of visits. These visits have been proven to be the most
effective up to. and including, the child"s second birthday. Visits arc made on an every two
weeks schedule with increased visits (weekly) upon initiation of the program and around the
birth of the infànt. This frequency· and consistency of visits allo\\s the mother to develop a
trusting relationship with the care provider and then tar the mother to develop a trusting
relationship with her child. Dr. Olds' longitudinal studies have shown that by the child's fourth
year there is a cost reimbursement pay back to communities tar those programs who follow the
protocols and when the nurses providing the visits have ongoing administrative support and
clinical supervision, as well as a limit on their caseload to 25 tàmilks per 4() hour week.
2
For ./efferson County residents who do not qualitY for ivledicaid. as well as those that do. there
are other services otTcred by JCHHS:
1. Childbirth Education
Childbirth education is offered at Jefferson County Health & Human Services in
collaboration with Jefferson Generall-!ospital. This is 3. 6-\veek series of 2-hour classes
tocusing on healthy pregnancy. the birth process. options for pain relief immediate
postpartum. breastfeeding. birth control and other resources. Most tirst time families who
de!iver either in Jefferson County or out of the county do take childbirth education classes
here. This is funded by First Steps for First Steps eligible moms and private fees for others.
2. Newborn Follow Up:
Harrison Hospital. Olympic Ì\ilemorial and Jefferson General. às well as Swedish,
Cnivcrsity. Mary Bridge and Tacoma General. contact JCHHS upon births of new babies.
Phone call follow-up is offered to all ne\v parents just to see if there are problems with
breastfeeding. sleeping, jaundice and any for any concerns that they may have. Problem
solving and referrals fÒr services are provided if needed. Home visits or clinic visits.
breastfeeding consultation and telephone follow-up are offered for those families who \vish
them. Some families lHeet the nurse. many are never seen by the nurse but have a series of
foJlow-up phone calls. None of these arc billable services. They are paid for in the JCHHS
budget by Maternal Child Health (MCH) block grant money and county general funds.
3. Postpartum Breastfeeding Tea Party:
The Postpartum Breastfeeding Tea Party meets wcek!y and has averaged tive to twelve
mothers a week. usually attending for six to eight months. The attendee profile varies. but
very often includes mothers with income and insurance and those on Medicaid. Issues of
baby care. feeding, depression. domestic violence. drugs. alcohol. changing relationships,
birth control within their family. crisis intervention. discipline. different feelings and
parenting styks. appropriate childcare. self care and sibling issues are just some of the topics
that comc up universally with each nevv group of women and babies. This is a peer support
group. Referral to resources is ongoing. There has been no funding for this at all.
Altemative Response System (ARS) and Early Response Program (ERP) are JCHHS programs
that are in conjunction vvith the Child Protective Services and are for families designated at risk
by Department of ChiJd and Family Services (DCFS) or Child Protective Services (CPS) and
referred by DCFS or CPS. The JCHHS Maternal Child Health nurses do see these clients for as
]ong as 90 days. The Child Protective Service caseworker is the case manager rather than the
JCl-II-IS nurse.rhese visits are usually around specitìc problems and not relationship based
long~term interventions. DCFS or CPS has refened specitic high-risk tàmiiies that need a high
intensity short-term intervention.
Community Plans
Jefferson County will be eligible for Early f-lead Start. JCHHS has met with Olycap and
collaborated in their application fÒr Early I-lead Start in this county. Early Head Start will be
able to serve ten or fewer tàmilies a year who have income at lOoo/!) of poverty level. The hope
is that they will serve those Ülmilies who have another toddler in the home so that both the
-,
J
toddl~r, the mother and the n~\vborn can be served in the same visit. One of the real gifts of this
is that families who had a lìrst baby while in MSS could have a different provider for the next
child who could be involwd with both children and help with the transition into school for
potentially high need families.fhe JCHHS provider focus is health. growth and development.
The Early ¡lead Start t'Ócus is education and family systems. The small shift in focus may
provide families \vith a deep enrichment and thc plan is that .rCHHS will be the gatekeeper and
referral point tor Farly H~ad Start.
Kitsap. Tacoma and Snohomish counties have used the Healthy Start (Hawaii) tamily model.
There has been discussion of starting it here. In light of the already existing services that are
outlined above. it seems that in order to tollow families with children until the age of five
utilizing the ¡--Ieahhy Start model there are some important considerations:
1. Funding
Funding for any potential new program is needed, as well as tìll~in funding for the second
and third year of BB. Maternity Support Services only pays up until the infant is two
months old and case management until infant is 1 year. There are no public dollars
available to follow a tamily the length of time required by either Best Beginnings or
Healthy Start. Currently the 45 t~lmilies being ¡-ollowed by Best Beginnings are using the
entire Maternal Child Health contribution of county general fund money, a March of
Dimes grant. Medicaid administrative match outreach dollars and the carryover trom the
prior year of MSS/MCM.
2. Collaboration
.rCHHS could potentially provide the Healthy Start Program (Ha\vaii model) in
conjunction with their other services as well as supervise professional peer home visitors
working with families up until the ehild's 5th birthday. However. collaboration would be
important in order to provide for easy transitions and continuity of care as well as to
avoid duplication of services and resources. Working closely with the existing JCHHS
programs would be ~ssential to avoid confusing offerings and competition for funding.
3. Assessment
JCHHS will be conducting a yearlong Pre Natal Risk Assessment Matrix (PRAM) study
in \vhich a series of45 questions is asked of all mothers after the bi11h of their baby.
These questions inc1ude tobacco use, domestic violence, support of mother, income, etc.
The PRAM study is currently being used in every county in Washington and the survey
is being conducted by the Department of Health (DOH). In JdTerson County only 5 to 6
women a year are questioned yearly. Since we have such a small number of births per
year and this rate has remained stable for the last 10 plus years, it is reasonable to involve
all of the women who deliver in Jefferson County·. thereby giving information that
accurately retlects our county rather than the larger counties within the State of
Washington. It is a very simple survey to conduct and we can conduct it in a similar
tashion to doing the newborn follow-up, in a non-invasive way, with the State DOH's
help.
4
4. Plan
With Dr. Chris Hale. epidemiologist. the plan is to conduct a PRAM survey on all births
in 2001. With this int'Örmation we \-vill have a better profile of how extensive an early
intervention/homl>visiting program JetTerson County needs. Best Begirmings is
attempting to serve all tirst time high-risk families that qualify for Medicaid (about 44 to
45 first time fàmiJies). MSS/MCM currently serves another 60 to 70 families. That \-vill
be our maximum BB/MSS/MCM caseload unless hours change within staff and we were
to discover that there are more Medicaid fàmiJies wishing our services. Early Head Start
will be able to provide services for ten families. With additional money, the Hawaii
model could serve additional families if a need were to be demonstrated. However. the
PRAM survey could evaluate the county need for new programs and/or expansion of
existing ones.
5
--i
I
:E
S
"
~
"
--,
(',
,,--...,
::r
:L.
;:;
::¡
1: 'J
--,
0
r, r;q
--L. ::¡
~
C ::J
-; n
,....
I ~
('
~J 0
.:¡;
:¡; ""'"
"I
"
;::!
D
I
::¡
=
""'"
("'¡
:L.
r
¡J~
:¡;.
::r
?
n
("'¡
::¡
n
'~
~
"
::L
n
::.>
::.>
r\
""'"
"
u\
7J
;')
:J"
""'"
:")
:L.
""'"
c
"
,X
."¡
(¡)
(t:,
c
--,
\,...[)
i
^.
n
'"
c
. .
Cy.
-:¡
-:¡
s
;:;:'\:
o
';~
,..
Cj:
^'
'"
:¡;
(\
:J
:J
::¡
""'"
C
7J
"¡
n
'i
::J
rl'
-:;:
S
(1;
::¡
n
:")
,........
"
r:;
:--n
: :,
. .
',~
::¡
C; s:
~ ,..
.,
~ ~
~ -
c·
;; ::1
=--0
:) ~
,.
~
--,
:")
"-... ~
::.>
;+¡
(t
,
t"
(t:,
:f
o
o
r
(¡)
'.-'
~
-'-
"
"
;::!
-- ~
.,
(¡)
(¡)
::¡
:">
IJ¡
'J.
::i
(S
¡n
~
c)
>
,.....
""'"
^'
-'
c'
::r
::¡
:ì
-.!...
::¡
...,.
^'
::
>
"
>
--,
~
V
:ft<
r---
.:...-
(¡)
o
')..
rf
.,
.J
,':Y c
~ -;
...:::
::¡ C
:L.
:;' rJ~
-'- r,
-;
^.
...
G
...,
::¡ -.-
i1 .-L
::¡ (]G'
:S,
-;
'.) :r
::¡
;::! 7J
0
~ -,
(/)
r:-
n
..,
-,
rl-
()
..,
-,
CD
i1
,..
-
"
S!
""'"
~
::¡
'J>
:¡-
0.
~
:r
.-
'J>
~
\J
;;,
:.;
"
-
~
',OJ
:.s;;
e;
-.
,........
I
:ì
rJI
'J¡
·
Attachment B
Medicaid
Medicaid-paid delivery*,
Jefferson County and Washington State, 1992-1999
Jefferson County
Year All Births Medicaid
1992 228 113
1993 224 120
1994 204 92
1995 210 113
1996 195 95
1997 201 104
1998 195 103
1999 211 115
Year
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
Jefferson County
49.6%
53.6%
45.1%
53.8%
48.7%
51.7%
52.8%
54.5%
*Based on births for which payment source was known.
Washington State
30.9%
34.3%
34.1%
32.2%
33.4%
32.3%
31.3%
32.5%
Medicaid-paid Delivery,
Jefferson County and Washington State, 1992-1999
100.0-".
90.0-".
80.0-".
70.0.".
60.0%
53.6*/*
50.0-".
40.0e¡.
30.0·/.
20.0·/.
10.0·1.
0.0%
1992
1993
1994
53.8,..
1995
1996
52.set.
S4.5*h
1997
1998
1999
,- Jefferson County D Washington State I
Àttachment C
Skamania
Jefferson
ISland
CJwiitz
Kjng
Pend Oreflle
Chelan
Douglas
Grays Harto
Whatcom
Garfield
San Juan
KJttitas
C:ailam
Pacific
Ferri
S:':agit
KJic!<itat
Okanogan
Lewis
Franklin
Snohomish
~STATE TOTAL
Yakima
Stevens
Thurston
Adams
Grant
Cclumbia
Benton
Waila Walla
Whitman
Ciark
Pierce
Mason
KJtsap
Wahkiakum
Spokane
Asotin
LJncoln
Unknown
STATE OF WASHINGTON· FIRST STEPS DATABASE
3/3/99ES
Maternity Support Services and Maternity Case Management Use
by Total Women with Medicaid-paid Births In 1997
"~
,
1 ,
1
; , I I
-, . I
1 I I
-J
r
1 , I
~ I
-J ì I
" , , I
~ i i I
-J , I I
" -
-, !
~ i I
-I , I I
~ I i
-I I I
~ :
-I I
"i r I
-j
~
ltY'ÞäI.n.
-i I
-I I i
i ; I I I
~ I I
,
, I
~ , i I
...
-I
, fJUlL!i~"a.iIUI!I~14~_ :íItI - .
; i
I ~~ :::=:'::~ .
. :W'SP. I
-I i ,
"...17 , ---. ,
-I I
- ,
i
-I !
, i ,
i I I
JI...:..... : :.,J:..._
r-'1'~ i ,
I
i i
0%
30%
50%
80%
90%
100%
60%
70%
10~IO
20%
40%
. Both MSS & MCM
.MCMQNLY
IJ MSS ONLY
DSHS Research and Data Analysis
Laurie Cawthon, MD, MPH (902-0712) MS: 45204
. . .
DRAFT
I. Intake to MSS --4-
Forums
Consent
ROI
Baseline Assessment
2.
Baseline Assessment Includes:
a. The client's knowledge of pregnancy, childbirth. and parenting
b. Client cultural or religious beliefs/prJetiœs regarding pregnancy and childbearing
c. The client's knowledge of major heJlth risks, danger signs of pregnancy, Jnd healthy vs, unhealthy behaviors
d. MedieJI fJetors relating to pregnancy risk and health behaviors. This includes HIV risk. availability of counseling
and testing, and if appl icable, lIse of AZT to reduce perinatal tr,msmission
e. Signs and symptollls of personal drug/alcohol use and/or drug/alcohol use in the client's environment
f. Personal tobacco use and/or consistent e'posure to tobacco use
g. The client's communication skills, primary language. literacy, ability to communicate feelings. maturity. decision-
making ability
h. Family structure, support system, physical/sexual/emotional abuse. roles and relationships, coping ability, stress
level
I. Home and work environment. including housing, safety and security, occupation. transportation and access issues.
and tìnancial resources
J. Dietary patterns and intake, resources for obtaining and preparing food, and evaluation of nutritional needs
k. Pregnancy and postpartum related changes in activities of daily living slIch as activity/exercise, elimination, sel f·
concept/body image, sexual ity
I. Understanding and utilization of health care resources, including dental and vision services
m. Screen for MCM eligibility
n. Need rÖr child care
o. Intant eligibility and linkages to pediatric primary care, parent-infant relationship, infant care concerns, parenting
I·esources. infant safety, immunizations and infant health status
p. Knowledge of and understanding of ramily planning services and birth control methods
q. Knowledge of breast feeding as an option
Team Meeting to:
a. Determine Further Assessment
b. Develop Interdisciplinary Plan
i. Client tÖcused integrating professional assessment and client concerns/needs
c. Confer on MCM Potential
i. Assign case manager~
ii. or primal")'~tact person _~ ---------....
MSS MCM
Up to 10 Visits (otlice ()r home including intake visit)
t
3.
--4-
B8
t
Initial review by ALL team members. either face to
tltce with client or in team meeting. Documentation
t
Review by ALL team
J.,
OngoinQ review
. Preparation for parenthood
recommended for all
. CBED
Child Care Screen
Transp0l1ation t
Inwlementation of Plan
MSS Team Concerns Referrals
WIC
ADTSA
CSD
Prenatal
DV
~
Ongoing review
Client's Concerns
Housing
Mental Health
Dental
Vision
Parenting Classes
Family Planning
CBED
·
COMA-fUNIIT NETWORK POSITION PAPER
Summer, 2000
Are you aware that 50% of Jefferson County's General Funds are spent on Law and
Justict: services? These services include the Sheritrs Departmt:nt, the Courts. Juvenile
Services, and the Prosecuting Attorney's Office. The activities of these departments
mainly are related to handling crime in one fonn or another, be it vandalism, domestic
violence and other assault, child abuse, and illegal activity related to substances. In our
county, we are spending half of our general funds on responding to and processing
criminal activity. In our community and most others, criminal activity and the funds
needed to respond to it are continually on the rise.
Many communities have responded to the trend by building large law andjustice
complexes. These complexes provide state of the art security; single-site locations for
agencies, courts, and often incarceration facilities; and convenient access for the public.
We are poised to build just such a complex in Jefferson County. It will come about via a
bond issue whose time, we agree, has come. Our county courthouse is unsafe by a
number of different benchmarks, and obsolete for handling the extent and nature of the
crime we face at this time.
One unfortunate reality is that the new law and justice complex-needed as it is-will
come at a cost to our other 'bond issue' instirutions such as recreational facilities, the
hospital, the libraries and our schools. We may indeed be heading for a time in which
more of our public funds are spent maintaining our safety than promoting our growth and
well-being. The fact that it costs more annually to house a prisoner than to pay for a
college education lends some legitimacy to this idea.
A second unfortunate reality is that the new ceIlter represents a response to, and not a
solution to, damage already done to our community. It is needed because we have
somehow failed to adequately safeguard our citizens, or to ensure that our commumty
members -whatever their ages-are capable of making healthy, legal choices. Current
tn~nds bemg what they are, we will only pay more and more to respond to crime if we do
not start investing in solutions.
The Community ~etwork poses these questions to our leaders and our citizens~
Are we comfortable as a community spending an enonnous amount of our taxes to
- process' social problems, with no safeguards consistently in place to help solve these
problems?
Couldn't our tax resources be invested more effectively ¡fat least a portion of them were
devoted to preventing social problems-such as violence in the home or school and
substance abuse-before they do their damage and progress to the legal system?
Isn't it time to develop a comr,unity plan for reducing the levels of these problems. as a
solution to reversing the ever-expanding industry that the criminal justice system is
becoming?
Weare talking about making solid investments at the front end in creating healthier
community, while we simultaneously maintain the necessary mechanisms for responding
to social problems and crime.
Research has proven that prevention and early intervention programs can be highly
effective. and result in huge savings to communities. As examples:
-Home visitation programs that offer intensive support to mothers at risk of
abusing their newborns have produced a 75% reduction in cases of child abuse and
neglect, thus breaking a violent cycle in which the abused too often grow up to become
violent offenders;
--Programs that introduce at·risk youth to positive environments can have a
significant impact Boys and Girls Clubs in 64 at-risk neighborhoods across the COlmtry
have reduced juvenile crime in these areas by 13%;
--Strategies that encourage commitment to school and academic success reduce
delinquency among high.risk students. For example, promoting reading skiHs helps
reduce delinquency. Reading failure as early as the first grade has been found to be a
predictor oflater delinquency.
Communities across the country are building prevention programs into their local budgets
and reaping the rewards. For example, Deschutes County, Oregon has significantly
reduced costs of incarceration by designating a portion of its juvenile justice funds for
prevention. The money saved by the State has been fed back into the system to create
more programs that intervene early with at-risk children.
Jefferson County has a number of model programs in place that we know reduce violent
behavior, substance abuse, and other social problems. One is the Best Beginnings Nurse
Visitation project currently in place with grant funding at the Health Department.
Another is the YIPPEE program, founded on the successful Best Self model in Skagit
County, which offers low--cost after-school and summer programs to children and youth
in the south county. YIPPEE is a good example of a prevention program that began with
local commitment from the Law and Justice Council and the Commissioners. and is now
supported by a combination of local and state grant funds. Y LPPEE and the Best
Beginnings project have the potential for significant positive impact if they are in place
over the long·tenn. Their longevity will take a solid commitment from local government
and our community. We have proof that these programs work: it is time to make that
kind of commitment.
The Community Network asks the citizens and leaders of Jefferson County to commit to
preventing the sorts of problems that we otherwise will continue to pay for more and
more dearly. Tt m;:ans making a local financiaJ commitment that may not yield
immediate. tangible results. It means investing in prevention programs that have
demonstrated long.term social gains in rural communities such as ours.
We believe that it is time for our citizens and government officials to commit to building
a safety net of programs in Jefferson County that win help ensure the well-being of our
community. We ask this not only to stem the rising costs of the criminaljusticc system;
but to help ensure that al1 children, youth, and fami1ies are given the opportunities to
thrive and reach their positive potential.
Jefferson Coun Health and Human Services
JANUARY 2001
NEWS ARTICLES
These issues and more are brought to you every month as a collection of news stories regarding
Jefferson County Health and Human Services and its program for the public:
1. "They call it puppy love" - Peninsula Daily News, January 12,2001
2. "Saddler: PT not being taxed twice" - Peninsula Daily News, January 14, 2001
3. "Agency adds to hepatitis protections" - Peninsula Daily News, January 19,2001
4. "Jefferson, PT services pact is near" - Peninsula Daily News, January 23,2001
5. "Flu vaccine still available" - P.T. LEADER, January 24,2001
6. "Jefferson's health due for survey" - Peninsula Daily News, January 26, 2001
7. "City, county settle spat over fees" -Peninsula Daily News, January 30, 2001
8. "Back jail bills dropped as city, county achieve regional services agreement" - P.T.
LEADER, January 31, 2001
Q)
s
o
~
..
en
Q)
l-
ea.
ea.
=
D.
"Q) -, >;"'O..c:' "'0 >, Q) (\) ,....., ,- [/) >, . '-;.., """..c: Q) Q) 'ÇIJ
~...c~i:J.I) .........,"'0 Q):¡¡-.D >::1 ~~"'o..f?"0o.. ::1.....,........c .Dt>J¡
;> ....., 0 0 -;:;;¡ .- '@ """..c: 0.. Q) .D 0 ·Û...c 0.. (¡')' ~. 0..'; '" ....., 2 c
...., z"'O ?; [/) ~ ....., 2 = .¡:: ...c Q) ::1 _.D .... ;> ~ 0.. "0
.... >.....'" >~ i:J.I) c..o,,::1a¡ 0 Q)...
>, " ...' '- - '" a¡ - ùI.J 0..-;>, ....- ....- [/)..c: ....."'0 ....., ..c: .....,... '" "'0 00 ""
~2~"'O $]t~~·~@~·~~ 21:>.O~~.9-o~ -o~-oª~æ~
i;': ~'§ '"9, 0.....: ' ~ ^'........c ° :<:::,- -........c Q) -= '" c 5 <..> v - to!)
_~_"" [/)"'_Q)""-....., -.=~ =w...c:·_-Q)..o....c
d,) ~ .:;.- 0....... u a¡...c ~ ....., ~...c .-;>, >, "'0 ..0 '"
c....c:: a oj 0" C [/) Q).- E ~ 2 ~ ~..... s:1 ....., z¡ ,--;,...c 0.. c ....., 0 ..... :.a
=' .....,:':1 g Q) @ ~ $ ~ _ ~ s·-.... ....., ~ .~ .- ~ v 0.. a¡ '" '" -0""" '" d,)
;::s:¡ .... ....., Q),...., "O.......c 0.._ ..... ~ '" "'0 =' ~ a; d,) 0 "'0 a; ~
i:J.I) k" _ 'v .- - ....., [/) <I) ° ~ "'" c ..c:.- c.. "" c... Q) >
Q) c" ùI.J >,...c.... c '" ....., <I) ...c . = ° ê Q) > [JJ £j .......c -0 ;> c
t:.a ~.5 Q) ....., c.. oj Q) [JJ c...... -0 ....., . . ~ ''':; J::;g..c: '" 2 2: >,. '" ~ Q) ....., :tS
~æ~~ '5·~='~-;:..E~" ~....~='rnc....~"'o..;:&..§ §~..ê'5
~ ",Q)~> ·~Q)._...."'oo Q)O-", rn"""
Q) 0 Q) -0 1:>.0 i:J.I) C ..c::;::S:¡ ;> to!) >....., Q)'-'- ~ Q) rn....., Q) <I) '-' rn ° <1.\ ....., .~
$rn..........o cCc E-" .....C>,0<l.\...c 1: b='......c..c:: ]"O'i5.,='.....
" 5..... ->,~ ~ .>..¡:; .!::" ~ u j;J ::; )-< E- ...- <I) c rn a¡ 2 ....., E-'!:: Q) S c..¡:Q <:de
o~<I)O ",,,,<1.\ ° <:d_ro i:J.OQ) ~""'æ· ..c:"'''' Q)·-oJ=,
...c1.:::'52 ô.2:5 c~j~.S~ Q)~..oSrn~2 '5c.'::C::0. 2:
....., Q) 'tw-o "'....- 0 ' E Q) :n ...- Q)
;:; .:: 2 c Q) Q) '- """:.a ...c -;:.., <I) ...c
'-' ~ ~ "õ. 2 -3. ~ C1J 8 ~ ..u ~ +oJ
-s1@a¡....:3 o.c13e....."'OcQ)Q)
::1 ,.¡::::::'n :::IQ)cEQ)c='...c~
o C) ~ ~ ~ o..~ L..¡ -- - 0 en
.... ..c 0 C :::'- g- õ U a¡ °
..c ..... tw - u .~ 0...... Q) Q) <.::. c.J:: .....
.....:-9:: ~ E 'IJ rn ¡:;.D c... Eo':;; E
~ ;;J ;..c (!J Q) âj Q):- -....>.:; ~ 2 ; 'J
ò.. ..... ..c ..c: a¡ ... >':3 O"æ <..>;::s:¡
::: E Q) ...., ..... .D -;>,~ 0 :) ';3 .s ..c
..2.- ~ ~ tw .....;>, a¡ ..... -0 rn '" c.<:::
~ c o-o..c: -3-0 0;<;;
r, . '- -0 .- :a ...., .... 0. C C u
:;.....,O~..c: ^'Q)....~oOjo......
;>....c .....r.J¡ .......~"""'- ~ C)Q)
....., 1:>.0"'..... OJ.... Q)- Q) a¡-O Q)'IJ..... E
- ¿¡ -;<;; 51: oj..c:...c oJ::.~.¡¡;
èCu:Ö .J::E-Q);<;;rn;..,.....,::l...oC
a¡Q)C:;"'O ;> a¡ã3",o..Q)'II
î;:5 ~ E @ ê 1 ~ -5 ~ JS 5.:::-:5
..-
<t;
:;;¡
9
¡;:
Q
¡,¡
::J
Z
¡:
Z
o
U
,:.. ~ ~ 2: ~ ~.:: >'-0' -0 .... C ~ .
-~V~c..--'" C<l>Ëj\1J5 ~.~
"O"=o..c::,.¡:: :d@",=:.D w'IJa-.
E~š.~~_:;,"" a¡..c::c.s"-' §::!~
....0 00-0 <LJ "":: ¡;¡c..;¡;a¡'IJ ..;:;0.J::
Q) OQ).~..c ..c~0..cc "'....~
-: E ~.; §:~ ~ ~~ OJ) ~ ~ -ê E ~ ¿
~o c:3~ ........--'" o.....~
- u:5·- o..c -0 - - ..... '" C E'- :::,....
Q) _ ~ .... Q) :2 :§ -c 'IJ'¡: Q).:: ....::...:
-5J~;¡;-c~~a "'OtOl:>.Oe~..c: 0:;;
u"OQ).....~u "'....5;.::<g:....,l:"'u
"'Oe:Q)'-"" ~en""'Q)..c:""" "'0,,'11....-
'-:d'- .... - ...... "" co Q) w._ ::,¡
~~~rn~"'Oã3c~u~~~Q)e::l.~
:ö. Q) ..... ¡;; e: en i:).¡¡ U <..:. c..-
"'ee:· "'~OO::l:::Q)(\)Q)C::;O ;:I""
5,.- .- ~ 8 g ~ ;:I...c ¿:, .¡:; 'õ.. -0 - ..., ç o.~
o..~ >'-Q) ¡: - u :if 3:::-' ~ 0.0; -5 3:.... <1i ::,¡
::: ~..c~o·~-OQ) ~;:I...·-O ..c:~
0. Q)'IJO...,-OOjC Q)c..Q)~-C .......,
\:)
I
N
I
-
'-<
.::::J
R
....>.
>.1- CI.
G) = CI. G)
.cca=>
I- U CI..2
~
~ .1
!'¡~...
ã ..:
~ :~
~ 'Q,=
z "'..
¡" ¡j
.c"
¡¡ ii.s
~ .~
.J 51:
~ ~:;
i.:>,
ø. e- III
0~1;I
. ..,S
.1;1 I:
:!i!.!o
o ~:J:;:
~..'"
1;1.0
=~1
·E~
i.....
¡S!ë.!
.1:.""
1::"11I
.e~:¡
....C~
o III
;0.,1;1 !
III! II
Yo ~.
.§.g~
:'=11'"
~>:.. .,~ . ~ bD.., -.¡ "!
~ .,~~.~ ~~S =~ ~e", ..2 ~.~.~ sJ~ c
;~ 0: ~ (J ç...<: ~ bO ;!J,. ~ .;: 0 _ .~ -;¡ 0 .,,. ~ ..<:: '" ,'" .-..., ~ ., '"
V.,I a);1'I ~ ~ I:U) ~......... ~ _ ~ -.= I: ãJ ~ ~'"I::f c ~ ... -t.Jo u c:: L..- c: cd ...c:: ~
I ~ ii -'=' ,'3 1; 0.5 g¡ o.2:! ..., '" c. 0"<:: ., .3 '" ~ :t E § 1! '"' eo!;; '" 11 e ... ö:
I.t..o =;:t; ~ ...c: _ f1'J U e- Q,'I 0 ~ :n '-- ~ ;! --'= 0 Q) ~ oto.J ¡;;¡ Q. .=,.J ~ Q,) "'Q lJ t: . :1r
CI Ó æ É >. 8 ~ gj ~ ~ .~ .ß .~ ] ~ ~ ~ -g, g¡ ~.~.g ~,g '" ~ 5 ·ë..~qj .. 0 E æ
~ 5~1 ~ .~ ': ~ g ~ -5 .3 _' 5..£ "* ·E.! g :t ª -š -g -51! ~.5 ~ 1$ ~ ~ ~ 8. ~ ê 0
V" ~ ., ~ C:,."...,. .,., f..--" -'=' ~ "--- o· S ... e .~.. O.;:¡ ...
;z: '" 5. "'·ã 0:.0 ~.. . '" ~ ... ai € ..<:: (J) iä.n ~.;¡; ~ ~ -5 "':;1., ~._., i: g 5. >. .,
~.å ><.!J .. ¡¡¡ .8 e s] -'=' '" -âs g:¡ .."¡¡ :te::... <i:: o'¡ -ci ~ -5 50-5., '1:1 ., -5 ~
~:rê ~ ai ~ ~ -5 ~ Ö\ ~-~ g:2: ~ ~.§ .oJ ~ 'ª ~~ ~ s 1i 'ã ~ ¿ í.) -5 'õ ~ a 11.s ~ ¿:
&: 11 'E ~ ~ ~ 1!;a JJ & -5':: f.j] ~ E..< ~ ~~ 'Ë:å:¡¡¡ -5 ~ §'~'~ ~ lt~:ë 1 ~:~
o a J E ~ t: 5 :t:.:::, e- ~ ;; .,:Ö -5 >"~ -S"¡¡ 0 >. ê: "" -..::.!! '" ~ _ ; 3! . g¡ 8 ..
11., ~ g..~ "¡j-& r 6 s Ê.ß'¡ g,g: 1! 1ö' § g: ai E ~] ~.5.~ ~ ..o..t1 ~ S Æ '" ~ 'a.'~ 'õ
.....0.<:.<:.... 0"" 0'1:1 ..c·_E-<"·<i'1:l~<I>""O"7>~>:..B-c.2i-"=
Orf)...,...,o S-£i-£i.8fn¡ 5..88 :ta ~~~~'61;g ë.::~~g,-:;¡š
'fJ 'fJ
V c::
" ~
c::....c:
o 0..
u :.....
íJ.) 0
..0 :.....
c::..8
Ç'j
6 6
~ ê
'"
'"
;. '"
~ ~
~z
~
...¡<
:.,Q
::¡ :s
~ :;,
:¡: '"
0..3:
"" ~
~a.
¡
I
-r
()'
I
':)-1
-- ,
\ i
-:
I
<:
.~
Q)
(.)
!
-C
'(1)
>c:
m
....,
'oJJ
c
.-
Q)
.Q
....,
o
c
E:
. .
'-
(1)
-
-C
-C
m
(I)
~ 1 ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ ~ .j .. i
:5o~~~'E ~]ga~ãCJ
~~'-"ö(U c¡¡ ~::s
c¡¡ t:.S ~ (U ~ ~,8 2 ~ r.n
~ &: C¡¡'E ~ 0 æ 1! 'i "iiI Q
. .... -5 3.j .- .,¡;: ~:æ! 3 ~ ~
"§-Šc.Š"a~] -Ë"" So §~ ~
.;:s....>:,¡:: .. c¡¡~. SR-¡Ii:
5$ â.i !:3 .s <S i ª C¡¡.ð >
"a S >,;e ~ >'.;1'- S -5 E ~
å! ~"2-g..§! rn å!E=: å! 3.j c.
;:¡jrno.....15,88-5 È;¡;¡cd
"'O."'OO"¡;: ]oãj ¡:f
á3 §] tJ ~ 1 's. ~ -5 ~.~ §
S rn 8 00 ¡:: B .$.~..·m
rn~;;'::;8 cd.8t:...c::..c "'0 <IJ '
§ ~.¡:; rJJ "- ,,0 g ~ g;>o .s .¡§
.- .. ~ Ç\...,...... en Q)
]~~ rn §È~; ~.;. ~
~ gf"'O 8 8 "'0 'E @ 'C; a","
1;'f! @ 8:J¡';I 3.j ~ _ ~ 0)
~ ~ 0 .... ~ ~~ (i .g '0 3.j þ;t
'-'<ñ0 :::>,-§o~ §(i§....
..~0·..::J <IJ..Q 0C¡¡ o-aÇ\
o .. Ç\ S 0 '5j¡ rn Q õ ....
íß ~ ~ æ t ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ g
55 <IJ;j to..g .. ._ >, ....0 ~
¡@ § ,g ~..... <IJ <2 s::: "-<;:" 4
......., .,c¡¡.,¡;: oj....Qoc¡
.."8 ;e.........",o_"~ ""tlDQ
~ ..~ '0 0 ~ ~:ª- å 8 'g -5
;j,8"'Ot:1j.... ~ Q~ Qo.o....
~;e@;jt-<"3 ~.séijt:g....~
b ª d5 8 ~ .Š ~ ¡@ ~ ;); ~ ~
C/) C/)
Q.) Q.)
.~ U
C .~
Q) è
uQ)
~ C/)
. ~
8 0
~"~,
b Q.)
C/) U
......-j .~
.S ~
S~
u .~
~ U
r.r;
C b.O ~~
o c ~c.¡
VJ'~ ~ z
~ M..j~
~ ~ ~~
Q)..c æ~
~ u ~Æ
~~~è~bOaj2ìc¡¡
o ~.Ö·- O).~ ~ ~-5
.. Ç'E-<....;.:::. Ö1
(U ~ "'0 bO
¡:: 2ì ~'> ~.$ ! 0 .
.- @ (i O ~ c. ::3:::J
-s:I"'O 00 9,Q~ ~õ
~.- 0 a. 0
rn ~ '6'03 O ~ ~.-
C¡¡..~ "'0] 0
~.€ 8 ~.~'g'~ Jj ~
rn '-' <.,::, '¡:; '-' u ;.::: .... ''a
¡g....1]t:r..... ¡,::: >,'0
S-Š~~:B8'ãc¡¡È
S ·...."'015c¡¡j:::J
E=:E~.$J3fi-£rn8
...."'0<1:1 C¡¡"Q
"'0 c¡¡ "t:"'O C¡¡..,C
'> - ~,.:¡ ~ 0] ~ '.oJ
O 0) .- 0 g.:::J Q ..
o ~ ~ S.. 0 ~.s
t:bO~¡::~..
o.S a! 5$ =:::I ~
c.,c¡¡ ..Vaj
.0 Þ¡ê J ã
¡-gS..9Sø::g
°a Æ
O~Ë.8j·€
z cd 18 ~Q Q
~~C¡¡~J""'O
~:E~§, ~
°æ.scd· ~
E-< .. >:,~' ~
E-< ] ¿g:.~ E-<
~:q~ S.... Þt:
2~ã!æ§¡f
~1'~8
Q)
~
o
S
>--
--.oj
.........)
~
bfJ
.~
--.oj
C/)
......)
C/)
OJ
;::j.
CT
OJ
~
..
U)
CD
U
.-
>
..
CÞ
en
c¡¡ 0 0 "'0:;'" -r:;J C tID..<:: . do) . do).....
bO 0 cd 0 <1:1- '¡¡¡ 0 0 ,-,Om ~ -'= 0
o 0 -" c¡¡ c. .- ;j 0 :::J o,¡ ....
cd -....(1) rn...."'Oc'-'..Q.. c¡¡
"¡;:~~C¡¡~3 ..~o~ cd....k^~.
'-'........ ()~cd "'0 ""',.<1.>
~~~001 ~S""~~Q~<1.>"":::J
~'~c¡¡SE-< "'Oæ~jg~ojc.â.i@
.- a: -:5 -3 . c2 h 0 >. ~ .5 0;;:: ~ [;
~ -,=t:. ð - en 0.-<1.>..
<1.>,"'¡:: "'0 bO 0 .~ 0') "'0 @ "'0 .0'.,3 ~ c.
E .:æ .@ ~ 0.. :3 ~ ã ~ æ"3 ¡:: ~ 3 aj B
c¡¡<I1....oQ ...c:...c::'-'~ ;:>,
E-<-" go¡':::'S~~~~o"~~o~
~ >, å! ......,'<t'~..c.ò 0 c¡¡ ¡¡¡ ~ <£ "E-<.... ,:)
ë - .~ C- 0 § S r..., C. 0 ...c: .... ~
:::J~""c-~ S<1.>õd .E-<c¡¡~ 0Q
"8°æ~~8·-~"æ....~c¡¡~;:8
'Qi .. r.n §. () 1d' c¡¡ E-< ~ ~ :::J 8,s -g @ E g.
£<2 t£2£ £~.go..boS",~
.... ~. <1.> 0 x r.Q c "'0 rn cq ~ 0 "'0 "'0 "'O"C c¡¡ "'0 ....!. '-0
'-' '-' <1.> cd O ~ C'- Q 0 .... 0 d) 0 ..... .. <1/ 0 õ3
~c....:!!...c:E-c. ,~a; g...c:¡ßcd:E ~õd<2S~c..ë
....c¡¡c.~c¡¡c¡¡ -s:Ib~rn",o.... PQC¡¡...c:2·Dc¡¡
¡,::: "'0 ~ .... .52 .,¡;: ~ (j)'0 So'> Q C ~ "¡;:..Q rn .- ~
a rn '-' .... c¡¡ rn ._..:;; 0 > c¡¡. 0 () 0
c¡¡£S.£&j bO . ¡'::::::J c¡¡E-< å1 5,0 ~ÌiE-< t; rñ~£ª 8-
o ";:; ~ <11 .5 ~ Ç\ ¡¡j.,¡;: ~ ~ ;:..,..g cd 0 t: <,:, ~ :::J O,.,:¡ M
° Q) > ~ c¡¡ ~ ~.52:a .... "';"'0 .... >. Q 0 .:;: ':ï; ..;> x >,
¡,:::.,¡;: ... C - 0 .... 0:1 ¡,::: Q) "'0 c., "'0 .. - 0 '0::1 -
.~ Jj ~ g ~ ~ ~ 00° ~ 1;; 8 r.n g ~ ";;î'm :'0 'õ3c. ~ '~'.3 ~ æ
'-'........~~ j5...c::"""'O'-'.........;rl q¡:::Jú)C
c¡¡ '"d ð'J d)""'- "'0 .:3 6 .... ~ Q ~ cd ;:.., ii5 .... .....¡ .o·D c.
.~.~ ª'~S ~]~~-a¡;ê ~~.~~§~~~~~~ ~
-55$toª"'2'õ~j':ï;~~~"]8~gt:~8Æ~
c. (i.... OJ"':¡" .,--. "'0 8. . ~ 0 rJJ cd'> cd . '-' bO
æ c¡¡ § E c¡¡ g¡ ~= 15 ~ rn ~ c¡¡ b ~ Ç\ UJ ~ go <1.> ãj i æ
~:r: S ~ -£ ~ rn £ > ~ ii5 S·O..o .s c."'O -£ -£ ;> :.;::;
............;c¡¡ rn-c¡¡t: rnc¡¡' '....oc¡¡rn.s
<: 0 ~.s:.,¡;: å! ~,..c: 0 :::I :a ] 0 0 oj,.Q:.2
.." Qc¡¡o.... 0 ....p", "'OO", OQo.........
... ~ - c¡¡ 0 .9 '- ...; d) "'4 U å! ..:;; 2J
~ 8: ~UJ § '~ i ~ 'õ ~ ê æ ~¿ 1! 5 2J .s ~ ã
cd;e]<!:: ·c"ãSo~o.oo ...."'O:fic",o ~
~ 0 ~ <1.> ~ g ~.9 "2 c¡¡ '.,3 rn æ.:E' 9 oj
~ cd 6:Q rn å! S.. Ç\ .... S1.- > '" ......, 0·.... .... :¡¡
z QP"" 8 ..Ç\~"'OO:::J C.,¡;:c¡¡:::J0 ..Q
g:: æ" ~ 0 1! .S- bO <1:1 ...c:: 'æ cd ...... ...c::..Q S
z "'0 "'0 ~ 8 "'0 .....~ ¡,:::.,¡;: >, <1.> ~,8 -r:;J .;:: "S!
o ~'ê t: >, '12 "'0 ~ l~ .f' E £ ~.5 § § i ~
Q ¡,:::.O.... ..c¡¡.... '-'<1.><11 rn,-,c¡¡..
.- '- p", 'S c¡¡ .... rn 0"'0 Q. rn . 0.<::: .... ()
.... 9 :::I ;:¡j ~ ~.- @.,¡;: ~ ~ "'0 S i3. ~ c- ¡::¡ ~
..ê ~1! S :»"'0 0 .. >, rn ~ ... -a ¡~ S rn S lQ ...c: "'0
o .... c ë cd:::: :::J ë P......9:! '"C .- .... :::J 0..:;;1 . - cd
E-< oj bO ~:::JUJ qs ¡¡¡;j ~= -æ oj ..E-< '-' ,-,0 ¡¡:¡@UJ
-"000 <1.>c¡¡00 oÆ ~o<;O~c¡¡
,-,,_0,-, ....'-'E-< ~"'O ......-r:;J_~>,
PE:-JINSULA DAlLY NEWS
Agency adds
to hepatitis
protections
Peninsula health
offices welcome
reporting rules
By KEN SHORT
FOR THE PENINSU/-A DAlLY NEWS
Health-care providers in
Clallam and Jefferson coun-
ties now must report inci-
dences of patients diagnosed
with two forms of chronic
hepatitis to state health
authorities.
The contagious hepatitis B
and hepatitis C conditions
have been added to a revised
list of 63 notifiable conditions
reportable to the state Depart-
ment of Health.
Hepatitis is a liver-scarring
disease that comes in seven
forms beginning with type A.
The conditions is caused by a
parasitic virus that scars the
host's liver.
Tom Locke, chief health
officer for the two counties,
said the regulations, revised
last December, are intended to
unify a previously complex
system of reporting.
'Compelling benefits'
Locke said he helped craft
the new reporting require-
ments because of the "com-
pelling health benefits" of
tracking the contagious dis-
ease.
Hepatitis was notifiable in
the past, but only the initial
diagnosis.
"The rules were frag-
mented, confusing and scat-
tered through a myriad of
state laws," Locke said.
"You had to look up a dozen
different laws." .
But patients shouldn't
worry about breaches of confi.
dentiality - the data are used
only by the state in part to
stop the spread of the disease.
"We have a perfect record of
main taining confidential i ty,"
Locke said.
"Our goal is not to generate
lists of names."
Some people are more likely
to contract hepatitis C than
others. Approximately 4 mil-
lion have the disease nation.
wide, Locke said.
Hepatitis C is spread pri-
marily through direct contact
with the blood or body fluids of
an infected person, Locke said.
How it spreads
Rabies, anima] bites,
anthrax, smallpox, diseases
a!;sociated with the human
immunodeficency virus,
measles and plague are among
other previously notifiable
conditions. .
Prior to Dec. 22 when the
new regulations became effec-
tive, only four hepatitis C
diagnoses were reported
between 1995 and 1999 in
Clallam County, Locke said.
Two cases were reported in
Jefferson County during the
same time period.
Locke said new treatments,
interferon and ribavirin, have
increased the cure rate to 40
percen t.
But in some cases where a
patient refuses to be treated
for a reportabJe disease the
county can take legal action to
force treatment.
"We have some public
health police power," Locke
said
The regulations give the
counties' health department a
wide range of protocols includ.
ing notifying and tracing part-
ners of patients diagnosed
with some infectious or sexu-
ally transmitted diseases.
For example; when a
patient diagnosed with tuber-
culosis refuses treatment,
county health officials on rare
occasions can force the patient
into quarantine and trigger an
investigation of the outbreak,
Locke said.
{-L9-ol
Edition January 23, 2001
Jefferson,
PT services
pact is near
Health coverage
sticking point
in ongoing talks
BY PHILIP L. WATNESS
PENINSCLA DAlLY :-lEwS
PORT TOWNSEND - Several
issues concerning money are still out-
standing, but Port Townsend should
::;oon have a regional services contract
with Jefferson County.
Port Townsend City Manager
David Timmons was authorized by
the City Council on Monday to sign
the agreement, although he will con.
tinue - to work out the details regard-
Ing the municipality's contribution
for health service::;.
County Administrator Charles
Saddler had proposed that Port
Townsend ante up $80,000 for the
county Health Department.
2O-minute council meeting
He has maintained that Port
Townsend used to contribtlte money
for health services before the state
Legislature enacted a law that had
cities contribute a portion of the
motor vehicle excise tax to counties to
support county health departments.
\\!hen Initiative 695 passed in 1999,
that funding evaporated.
That is one issue that still must be
resolved. Timmons said Monday that
he will meet with Saddler on Thurs-
day to discuss that and the other out-
standing issue of jail services billing
from previous years.
In the shortest meeting of the past
three years - a mere 20 minutes _
the six council members at the special
meeting Monday unanimously
approved three resolutions authoriz.
ing Timmons to execute contracts for
law and justice services. mcluding
District Court, jail services and emer-
gency dispatch, health and human
services including animal services
and substance abuse programs, and
computer services.
The council previously budgeted
$400,000 to pay for the regional ser.
vices, which included $17,000 for a
joint study concerning the equity of
the contract.
Jefferson County counted on
receiving $495.000 from Port
Townsend when the commissioners
approved the 2001 budget. However,
the county budget included the
$80,000 municipal contribution pro.
posed for health services.
Timmons said the disparity
between the amounts will be
addressed through a supplemental
budget once the contract has been
finalized. He said the city budget
includes a larger reserve than needed
for just ,that reason.
Agreement over jail
The two governments have also
reached agreement on the details of
what information the Jefferson
County Jail will provide Port
Townsend regarding inmates housed
there on misdemeanor municipal
charges.
Past records haven't included such
details, leading to a disagreement
between Port Townsend and JeITer.
son County regarding how much
money the former should be billed.
----- ----.
A 8 . Wedne5day, January 24, 2001
Flu vaccine
still available
Jefferson County Health and
Human Services still has flu
vaccine available.
Anyone who wishes to be
vaccinated to lessen the chance of '
catching influenza may come to
the department's walk-in immu-
nization clinics at its office at 615
Sheridan St. in Port Townsend.
Regular immunization clinics are
1-3 p.m. Thesdays, Wednesdays
and Thursdays throughout January.
Immunizations are $8. No
insurance other than Medicare
will be billed. Those who are
on Medicare should bring their
cards with them.
Influenza vaccine is indi-
cated for:
· persons age 65 and older.
· residents of nursing homes.
. adults and children, includ-
irg pregnant women, who have
chronic heart, lung or kidney
disease, diabetes or other
serious chronic health prob-
lems, including asthma.
· persons who are less able
to. fight infection because of
HIV infection, other immune
system disorders, long-term
treatments with steroids or can- .
cer treatment.
. children' and teenagers on
long-term treatment with aspirin,
who, if they catch influenza,
could develop Reye's syndrome.
.' women who will be in the
second or third trimester· of
pregnancy during the fIu season
(beyond three and one-half
months pregnant).
· health care providers and
close friends and family of per-
sons at high-risk forfIu, to re-
duce the possibility of spreading
the fIu to these persons.
· anyone wanting to de-
crease their chance of catch~g
influenza.
Jefferson's
health due
for survey
Population
aging, but by
how much?
BY PHn.lP 1.. WATNESS
PENINSULA DAlLY NEWS
Local social service organizations
haven't had accurate data about the
demographics and health issues of
residents of Jefferson County.
That will change beginning in
March when 600 residents will be
asked to provide information on
everything from tobacco use to
domestic violence.
The Jefferson County Health
Department has already made'\ignif-
icant progress in weeding through
mounds of data to provide a snapshot
of county residents.
Epidemiologist Dr. Chris Hale of
the University of Washington and the
Bremerton-Kitsap County Health
..."...r."_.7'"""(."'~-!~-~
Dr. Chris Hale
Jefferson ~exceedingly old county"
District reviewed the information
Thursday for about 40 representa-
tives from Jefferson health, social
·services, education and govenunent
agencies gathered in Port Hadlock.
The data will fInally allow local
policy makers to make informed deci-
sions.
Good data, I¡¡etter decisions
"Good data drives better decisions
and better decisions drive more effec-
tive programs," said Dr. Tom Locke,
public health officer for Jefferson and
Clallam counties. "We have to make
decisions in the dark and that
impairs the effectiveness."
Hale said the data clearly show
what many in Jefferson County have
divined from subjective experience:
The county is aging dramatically
with far fewer young families bearing
children.
Inflating house prices also makes
Jefferson County one of the most
expensive places to live, especially for
the same young families at the low
end of the wage scale.
"You've become an exceedingly old
county,'! Hale said. :~That._doesn't
mean there's no young people: Yo4
have two worlds, the young families
that are increasingly disadvantaged
_ because it's an extraordinarily expen-
sive p1ace to live" and an expanding
popwation of people 55 and older.
Jefferson ages
Hale said 20 years ago' Jefferson
County had 200 people ages 85 and
older, while it now has more than 700.
The county with a 7 percent. rate
outstripped Washington state's 3.7
percent growth rate. The two reali-
ties mean more older people are mov-
ing into the area. The median age has
steadily grown from 35 years of age in
1980 to 42.4 in 1999.
"You are now the classic popwa-
tion in which deaths outstrip births,"
she said. "Only countries in Western
Europe is where you see that kind of
aging in-migration."
TuRN TO SURVEY/A2
v
8
~
CJJ
V
.~
..µ
~
..µ
CJJ
o
.µ
'"D
V
..µ
u
Q)
~
Þ<
V
C/)
'"D
~
Q)
~
..
~
G)
>
..
=
en
-a; g¡ ~R.8E~ ~.:g j.j¡ ~ 5 >: <l)"":'
0')..c:~:;I o-¡¡¡~..c:o 'i~~
:: § ~ ~. ¡ß £ 5.-::" ", ã) ¡¡¡ ::g _~ ~
.::: ._ "=' t>) ,3.. E'-" ~ tID N :0 <.1:1 ,:;
'" ~ '" >: ¡¡¡ -- "0 2J ,~ .8'&1 ::¡:¡;:: '"::I
~ s -5 ~ ~ -¡:; ~;; ã) g tID ~ <l)-'-:'
(:8-;';;"'5 ",~~.5.. -;<:~g
:;I....¡¡¡...¡.>u "O"O'-o:-><:->O g->:,¡
",,5..c:1>: !æo"8"'~~A'=
o~ ¡¡¡s.8 _>:tID~~"OB,-..>~.
;1:..<::: ~ - ~ >: ..c: ¡:: iiJ 0 - ...,
->E-"<:::.~¡::'" "<:::S·~~¡¡¡<XIk~'!~~
"9. ..>u...>: "'¡¡¡ ...»t>)o.",
.;:¡ ~ 0 ~ <XI g¡ k ""' ..d '¡¡¡ '"" eo... -> ~
U ~ '?, '" 0" ...d t>) '" .-= =>,'';:; 0.-<= ¡¡¡:;::
v. ~ tID - '" 0 <2 ~;>- c ..<::: ;/"J -
.g_~...; ..>"O~'" · ¡¡¡..c:<l)->:,¡
_ "0 0 s;¡ _ <0-, >:. 0. '" ~ . "0 ... t:. 0 ...
... ~ .... '" ¡¡¡ .. >: "=' .- -¡¡¡ <:- "0 1.
8;¡~sibb O=o.~·æo! c~~
~~tI..I~_ :Q..¡..;I~
s"] ~" "'..d"O ~ ,-,-,
<.1:1<2"0 .1:3>:>:.....>:'" 00"0 è:5~
"0 ::I .... rfJ .~ .51 -; <XI:;I .8 '" -¡¡¡ :::¡ ~ ...::
~"'- ~t!¡¡¡ ~S::¡:¡
..d>:o~ "'9,...~~..d"'o..... <l)":::»
..> __ ._ "=.8:;1:;1 '- èñ..d 0. .. 0 ..<:::"";::
.+-oJ ~ Q) . Q3 tJ ¡:r a" o·û Uo co ~ W ~ ~ ~
=¡¡¡.J:J»u,~ ...- ... ,---Sj:
Ot>) ~ .....s~¡¡¡~'" 'g¡::£ o§~
~ ~:g 1: >;..:.: ¡¡¡ ::s ¡::tID ~ 0 .c- i6 __::!.~ ':¡
",~:;I~¡¡¡"''''ü", -- ...¡¡¡'-' -'~
_ 0 >~"'-. ¡¡¡... ~~..<:::
õ'O U.c ... µ;¡ Jj>'::: - E ¡:: ð) '" ~ --
._ ~.... u ::s <l) 0 0 _ ._ ~ ¡¡¡ "0
t! .. <XI 1a ~ -¡¡¡ =.c:..'ëij -... <l)'" ;>- :~ 'a
<l) ~ .c: .... .. <l)';: __ '- >: rfJ >~ ~ ... _ »::<::: u;
:;I '- .... ,..:; ..> 0 U ;¡> <l) 0 v ...
cr' 0 ~ ¡¡¡ 1!';; i - '" '" ï: '"j ~ <I> ,8> 'æ ~ è I!
.c: <l).c:~o:_<I>"'<l)<l)~;>-'" "'-~~
... '0 ~ .... <:- .c ::.!:: e :;I 0."0' c¡.2 ¡:::::: ...
';:5",>: ~<l)"'U~»::: "<:::C¡'''' ~E
;¡> ~._.- ..... > >: '" ,_.c: cd ;I:.c:;I: - . .
.c-c- ''0'0'' 0
U~cd~ S'-2J""'--;; ~iò 3s
:;I :;I ::s :;s = ° ¡g u ~.~ '" g :::; ~
S...~"'.~u Æ<l)c~~ 3~"'~~'"::I
... C ".c >, ...'- >: g¡ c¡ u ¡:: ¡¡¡ o: .:::--:;
.'" <I> cd <I> .... .... .8 ° ° .. -- '" U:;I.c: "'.:::";"
......dw.c<l)>:uu otID<l> "'o....c¡->-
(1j..... ~-><::;I~.....g, C¡tID rfJUC;..c:'""
..c: ° . .._ 0u ... o: -§ -;;: >: =' ¡::; '" ~-::J
... '0 >,- .- ..c: ..c: ~ <l) '" 0 - :::;
'- 'æ"'2 '" ,'0.... U " .... = . <l):2 ~ 0 , n ~
I 0"'0":':>: 'O.._eno:>:>..>>,"'~
_ 11> g "i:S >: '" -5 ,:2 'EJ:¡,- '" ~...::-=
~o:..c:~-'O-¡¡¡o:::E=c ~_o;l:~u;~
~.~"'_~-¡¡¡<l)<XII1>C¡o:l1>_::",o:~~=
0." '" ..c ¡:Q ..c: ...> ..d ..c: _..c: :;I ;I: ... __ <l) n
~ Þ cñ'- __ ..@ oW _ 0. oW g. rfJ .3 Ë:b f¡} ~ -::J
:ð þ ~ i Þ '" tID~ gj 0.:2 c¡ ::: 3 :, t
~ ~ ::: >: c C¡';:: -c¡ .S ø ~ tIDE- 8 o: c....= "
"0 0 :;I :;I ;:j '":> :;I -¡¡¡ .. >, ¡:: -0 ,c 0 e U <l)""
¡::~ooo S....:;I<l)o"OEo ",c.>;.
.- .. U U U ..... -0 >''':; o: o:s a. ~ '':;
-
:::: ¡¡¡ 11> 11>-;1;( C..¿, 0 ,!. >:
0>8 "'::;0...0 :::'"
E~·= ¡"¡octJo1""""i -'
c¡ ~ ..c: ,~c <l).. s.: 8 ~
1:::,bgJ 11> ¿::o:l1>.ß ..c:
..:; ~ '" ... tID 11> tID..c: S @ >,
.- c¡ ~ ..§ ~ _S ;I: :;.s ~
....~-¡¡¡ ':o:-o~I.Q¡::o;:j
;'! 2 8 ;; Cc·;; 0 M - 0 0
-:: ~ ~ ;¡>._ in..<:::':- ~ -- (.)
.=» -0 >: <l) o: O:9"O:~
;¡:-- ¡::<l)- ><<1)<1)-
o~s~¡::>x~~..<::a~
..<:: ;¡> -0 ~ .... 'Q¡ ..<:::::..> 0.8
ø >, õj '" ._ ø E
->"<1.>...,~1;>>>~o I
co § ~ 6h~ <l) <l) ¡::.~ s: u
~ ° 0 e ::§.~ g] §¡' ~
-0 U E 0. c¡ o.U <XI 'ëij '':;
< ~ $~ a) E ~ ] ~ ~
(1j¡::..c:>:O'-N ...c
:;¡; .... U 0 ~..." ,_ ~ -0 ....
o .... - '" -0 .J:J '@ ~
~ 11> 8 tID . <l)..c:·w en ..c:
¡:,., ë. _.S g: 1a '0 ..c -> <l)....
Q 0.....·- >::;1 0 - "0
~ <l) 0 o: ~ >: ~ en - >: o: <1.>
~ c.E1P3~ :I:>:
z; ~ >, "0 E <1.> '"I:i = = '@
¡:: -0 '- ~ 11>:: ~ ..·æ·- r;;i3.
z; :?4:.:.s -5.s "'.~ ;¡:... ><
8 ""0 0 '0 "'<1.>
~oW ~ >:j¡ e ø:21,g g
Æ ,S '>,j¡ .... 11>';:¡"':; g >:-¡¡¡
:g tID~ ~ ~ bo.= .f...c: ~ ¡¡¡
,_ >: >:~ ""u -
.... ..... ..> >: -0 .- :; r:n 't' '"
,..:; ~ .... <1.>.=: '" 8' ~::t
S .ß -á .s È::æ :S 6h
PDrJ
I-:J." -01
City, county
settle spat
over fees
$160,000 for
jail services
in dispute
ByPHJL.D> L. WATNESS "'\
PENINSULA DAlLY NEWS
Jefferson County won't seek pay-
ment of past jail fees from Port
Townsend City Hall after all.
County Administrator Charles
Saddler and City Manager David
Timmons worked out an agreement
during a two-hour session Friday.
The county had sought payment
for an estimated $160,000 that was-
n't billed to Port Townsend last year.
Saddler discovered the accounting
mistake in November and deter-
mined that the county might have
underbilled the city since 1998.
But Timmons and Saddler agreed
that Port Townsend will identify
municipal jobs that could be filled by
developmentally disabled persons in
exchange for the county forgiving
jail fees for 1998 and 1999. Jail Ser-
vices Administrator Carla Schuck
won't have to do a thorough review
the incarceration records to set the
amount underbilled.
Port Townsend will also chip in
'VDJ (-30-D/
$50,000 over the next two years for a
county study to identify methods for
alleviating jail overcrowding. That
will be in lieu of payments under-
billed in the first half of last year.
"This is an imperfect solution,
but it reflects that they're getting
equity and we're getting return for
our contribution," Timmons said.
The agreement comes after sev-
eral months of wrangling over the
. jail billing.
"We found mutual ways to satisfy
both our needs without getting
stuck on the contentious issues,"
Saddler said.
Timmons agreed to contribute
$40,000 for health services, half of
the amount Saddler proposed for the
regional services contract between
the governments.
Other county services
Timmons said he is still war¡ of
setting a precedent for paying for
Health Department services, but the
contribution will at least resolve the
issue for this year.
TimrrlOns and Saddler will also
continue discussions about Port
Townsend contracting with Jeffer-
son County for building inspector
and fire marshal services. That
would lessen the financial burden of
each government in individually
providing those services.
.
;1
~
....... ~
= =
) = ~
..J - 0 e
î 0 U
-\
..... '- ~
J(YÙ ~
J ¡ ~
. ____ I
..-
.- OIJ
~
~
r:IJ.
~ CIj
QJ
~ ~
QJ .-
;...
Q..
~
Q.. QJ
e r:rJ.
......
~ e'd
r:rJ =
.... 0
~ .-
.- ~
"Q.
~
..... :.
....
~ ~
.~
~ .~
~.c
~ ~
~ '~
"'4) d,)Uu)"''''''' I-.C~-""'O ;>-.'-.........- G,)"QI_;::UIIUOIUU>t
U -¿,,¡:: ~ :¡¡ ,,¡:: <> ~ 0 >. .0" '¡;J "c: ¡:; ,,¡:: - <> :;'1 §.£.5 ~ ¡:; -g ~ ¿ -5.::¡ 1;',~,::: ~ E oS c
~o-- -~<>..~ ~~.¡ ~~- §~.g~Cl¡.~ ,,¡::O~_o ~~;C"OCO
='-Oo~~->'''' = Cl¡S°>, 8~~ui _N~""<>~·c~~.e~~u~
¡r; .~ - oS .::¡ = ,¡ .~ ;.g, \1 ° ..s '<ñ 01 e .c ' = 0 o· "Q¡ä ~ ~ ...., J! :<:'_ _0 .:!. ;::: '::'n ~ _ 0 ~ .0
0'-:::: Cl¡ ,,¡::....'....~,~ c.. <J";; 0 "I i'" ~ 0 ~ Po ,... ~ ,_ _~ .c »_
5U=C~'u_~ ...<>-¡:; ~ ~<J..~_ _ _».~.~~~~"'Æc09-<>
"'2 c: '6 .~ . ""..., '" ~ . o,,¡:: j ° .ß 0 "Q ~.:: c.. cf U 15 <>.g"Q .:: È ~ '" 3 ~ ~ .8 ..c; ,
",8.,¡j§-2~<>E"§:¡¡g~ ª -~ CO"'Cl¡ 0 "''''e~-o.o o~<>>'¿
...~~.::¡ :sæ= ~~-2 ~...u ~_Oc:J~ b""'~~·;-c<>E"'o~"'~.,~æ=
§., . , -' u 0 ' ~ ,..,' - '" ~ ... ~ <>.. _ u _ _ ._ '" _ __
-5 '¡;¡ -: ~ N ;:: Õ ¡; 0.... Vi';-: ¡; u ,... "<:I ~ r::r ::;0 0 '-0';::: <> . 15 '" '" ~ u ¡j ~ -;::: 0 0 ¡; ..S! Õ '~
o - '" <> ... U = '" <> .. -'" '" u ." <> .¡:; ..., c: ~ '" t; i1 u ,~ .;:; ,- <> Po -¿¡¡ _ 0.. '", - -5 _~ u ~
.,.,- õ' = '" 0 ~ <> ..¿, 0..-"", 6 ¿! .,., ~ -.. <> ~ .0 '" ~ 0 .;::: _ Õ '¡;J ~ ,. o.~ >< ...,....,._
0\5-6 gc;:: ",.. v:: <> "'~ <> o?--~ uOo >. -6.. ;:::~.c-æ "~8 Cl¡<-..::> »,,¡:: u <> e <> O' ... u
"I:t.... ¡;;; ~ ~ iU 0 - iU '-I -= U - """" II,) _ .. 00 O'O...c="O...... u IS) "" Ii: = ~ ..c ~ :; -5 "-e
\A 0 ..8 E '.... '¡;J "'" -0 ¡ 5Q ~ \A;:; .. <> .-= ~ - >. ",. c: ~ c ~ N = . ~ .. = 0 <> _~ E ~ -5 ";;¡¡ -0 §.
Õ_ 1! := F 'õ § g E '" õ e '" 9 9 ·5 õí 0 ~ ;:.:., ~ <i;; ¡¡¡ 01::: 0 ~ ~ ?' .: 0 -0 .s :;::: ::: ,:::Z ,5 =
'" t'- ~ "<:I .'!.) e - g "8 ~ "'" e ¡£ Cl¡ '" .~ ,,¡:: ~ 'õÖ '2 j 0 .§.= e J.2 0 ¡:: 1;; § . .,.z ê ~ ~ . . .~ ~ <:: g .. ~
~. ..0'::; 0'" ,~ '3 E 1: ~ ~ 'P. _5 e ::: ~ ... ï: g ;; Cl¡ u ~ ~ ~ i)' u <> .~ ¡:: g Cl¡ ë ~ <> OJ ~ ~
0" ~:;; u Vi ~ '" ~ ;¡ <.It:l :; -;: .s goo u .::: ~.S 0.= Po :I 9 .0 ~ -5 E- 'ij ·;::.S c. ~ E E -G ..::
~~E~~~]~ ¡jg~]~è~ ~]~6~~~~;¡~ê~~g~ ~~"'~~6~~~
-0 ':' <..:: g .,g 'G .::.;!. . õ:i c. 0 E :... .~ ·~.s ~ 011 E ~'ü ,:¡ .0 ~ .~ 'õ ~ ~ ,g i3 .~ ~ ;;: ~ ~ ~ ~
<> 0 0 - 0 '" > "Q "5 ~ >. -; - ';a ..... ° '" 's;:.. ~ ~ ~ ~ -5 t! = ' OJ c ß ... ~ ~ -5 ~ 0 ';::'n '" ~
ª ; -Š ~ 5 -5 [ ~ ~ ';-:2 _î 'ij .s i -5.8 ; ~ ~:t' ë :; ~ .8 ~ go § -: .g 'S 'õ 0 - §... ... 0 .:' ... ~
-- ¡::....- -" 0 ~ 01., ~o . -:10= ~5~~~~5-5~
0..2= v<> 0..-> ~~ tJ- '¡;J ":IU- 3 §¡;: -0 ..
:I .- "Q 9 -= := 1;;' ¡;: 0 ;( ... 0 ~ ... . § ~ ,,¡::" ';:; U .0 =: 0 ,3 E:: S <r¡ -g ,0 ë
1;,11 U . ~~...., ttI U ~ ..... U In .= .;:¡ 0 ~ .,. ... ~ .. "'tj 0 _ ~ ~ ~ "0" 1.1.:I.", _ twI U '''" __ _
~ tJ "0 8 ~ ~ ..... - S Po = U ~ ... "'" ~ '2 '" 2! = ~ ... ,5 0 e .;: .2 Æ g; t:: '§ Ê- 0 ~';;;::: x :;
... '" ~ 0 := ~ :;;! <> .5 ~:;;:: <> ~.~ ~... ;.::: <> "',.z,.z tJ .., ~ ~ 0 ° u ,g, u I;: E ..; ~ Cl¡... ,:; Õ -..;
~ ~.~ N .c - R -5 ~ .. .;: .g"'" <> OJ ~ ... e ~ ." ~ ~, u 6. <> ,. =0 <> c: 0 ~ .. '" 0 = -: 1.1
1-0 ... ;;.. '+.I; QO ~ ~ u t> ~ 0 ~ ~ "..... 5 ..= ~ ,t:J :s """ IU '::II::' _
"'=eo>'=>.u~">.b""~<>'" >'",c=~<>' FU--o~ u>'~UO"'Q:
~ {: c.. on -g 0" "0 Õ ¡r; ¡r; .':: > ¡ä ~"'" = ] R ~ go....:I:: ~ ;:.:., -5 ~ 5 -5 ~ ~ "^,.g ~ -~ :§ -E ~ 8 a "'=
.- :.= V) -5 t.) 0 ~ '- .... II) U 0 .~ ~.9 . ~ .... ~ u õ3 . ~ - u '- _ :.= :; - - >. "::3 '.,. iU '" ~ "'t;J :::
u_<>="~"u~~~X~1S!apoti~-=.=e;~1:.'!.)~~8~~6"O~"''':~~
~ 'G';!. E -;; - -;¡ ..::> .= ¡:: ";;> q a '" .:: <> .0 ~ - :;:¡ <> 2" 8 - U e <> ~ '¡¡' ë :E ~ ~ ~ § ~ ,.g U 1;\¡ '2
- <: 1:: "=' '<;; "<:I E c: - 0 on :s '" ~ ;:::. 1ä "O,:¡ Cl¡" '" c: -0 ~ = ... 0 - ~ <> 0..... " _ <> -0 "
È g ~ -~ .,g ..;; ~ ¡;: 8 -š ~ g.;g ~ u :å OJ¡ ¿:j 2 .5.~ 8 Š ~ ,.g ~ ~ :' e :§. 'ê ,:¡ g. -5 ·<;¡¡.5 ¡:: E ::
<> >. <> -= ,>. -:;: ~ ..:. .':: Cl¡ ~.:. 0':' <> Cl¡ ~ ... ..., .'!.) '" Os '=' ' >.,~ ' ~ >. ~ Po 0 ~ -0 c: ... oJ,
,,¡::- ~- --~<>~.S'¡;Ju ~ -55~<>0 ..::>~~ =--<>'--c:-~<>'-o~
-'C -] ~~St ~2;:; -~c:~>,~õí <>:¡¡~oo~'c§"::>~'a~~-==:"E~
'õ-š ~ = b~ ~ 6"-0 0 ~'õ'"'" .i >..0;.6 ~¡;B "Q,,¡::: ~!t 5.,'" c~. 0,1-0-= E:=..... .::.
~- ~0-3'~oue~~ElJ 5~~~~~<i 5~~SooS~:~5~~e~~~0
.- ð »0 0" 2:::¡ .. .. = ~'':: 0 ... Cl¡ "<:I c:: ~ U . Po":::: = <> E û ... ~ ~:~ Po ~ ~ '- ::: :g os ~ .~
::: tJ ~~ ~-o ~02,g oQ_ ¡;:'õ::: 0~:Ë §~ 0bS<... g ª a:s¡ t; 0 >, <> ~ - ö"i:'- '" E~ ~
~ :; ;;;i';;; E:S ::¡ Po ~ ~ ] 'õ '8 ~ g 'Õ/¡ ° .. ~ ~ ¡; ~.o ~ 5.9 g 'Q ~ -;:: g '5 ~ Cl¡:: os 0 ~ 0 ìJ .=:
o ~ ð .~ OJ¡.D 'C ~ .D -'C 0 .;:: 0 :3.£ 0 , . .5 S< .~ ...... ~ u u ~ ~ ::¡ '" .5 'Ë 0,1 3 "E ~ ~ :.;
Eõí ~~!t",oPo==~v> ~~u~o:",.~~¡j~ oe·- ~ð]~~E~-~" _
8· .. ~ <> ..... ° 0 ,~ <> Po '" M -_ ~ 0 S!:' 0.. \A = >;: ~ :-: ~ :;¡ ~ e - '" ~ 0¡r; ° ~ - 0 >._
E .s = õ:a ~ >, Þ: ~ "0 - c: -= - .. tJ ~, » .. - .. v _ 0.. .. _ ì.. <> ~ _ 1.1
L: - <r¡ ~.~ u 0:::: ~ v >. c: .ª "'... ° .;' c: .::: '> - 0 >. ~ '" :a ~ '" :õ 0 - u '" S a:¡ - .- E
r-- c= ~ 1/..1 CIS U «r c.. - .- ~ ... I.l: ~ ~ 5-.1 "'t;.... 0 ~ u ~ .... ~ _ .... ~ t.ti 0 A.. ~ ~ u
o ... E ... -:= <1 ~... ~ Cl¡ .. ...] !;! ~ !'O -5 :.: '" 0 ~o '" ~ .'" '5 =0 ~ ~ tJ= 0 ..0 O~ ~ "
EO:;; U 0 E ~ 2 0 ::s 1: <> -....., ::;" = E ~ oj » ~ - _ .~ 0 ~ ~ .~ _ <> 0 _ ;>
uH~~g~~~>.EE68~~¡~§~ ¡~~u~g~-¡j~~:~~E.c~uû~..::>:~
:õ ... 0 0 ." .. '" <> "'..... .¡:;. 0 c::; ~... '" is .c. ~.¡::: 1;' '" _ ~,,¡:: <> E '" _ -0 ¡:; ~ <> '" ~
~r~ ?~ BEE~S~!§ uaO~~¡::g r~Þ.E ¡'<ñ~~~J'i~Q<5~E
~~ ~]~~.5~ ]~~]gg8 .;
~ ~ ~.;.~:: o.~ --5 Ü - f:i ~.~ cr"
15 on .. = '" > '" ~ :¡¡ <> Cl¡"O > ~ '" . <>
~i .5~·êe~~ ~~e]~~~i~1
~ -0 ~ 'ü E c.. S .~ >. .¿ = '", oQ - '"
~~ OC:OPo>. ~ -uo·-,.~...
~ - QQ :::J U ~ ~ iO -;;;¡ ~ ~ .~ _ ~ ... c·-
~ € ~ 8 >. S E > ..¿.,:: 5 > § g ¿g .9 ~
.c: '" - ~:: <r¡ .- - 'Cl¡ 0 8 ,Q ~ 0 ~
- 0 E >, 3 ~ = tJ . ~ "'·c ~ Eo -5 '_
"u ~o<>"'o,Qo>,O! c _
..c:: Uu <> Po"'''¡::", ¡;~o~..o
~ "=' .c U = .¿ ~ t.L, Ö. 0.. 71 c: ..5.':: .... .10:=
~~ -~~ u -0 ~
§~~~~o~~~~:::J=c._ =~~~
~~~~~-oo~..~~·ig~~~¿.2-
.~-ö~~E~=~·~§~~~~§~~i~
~-š ~ Ë ~ 5 E -= ¿ 'Õ -s ~ 8 .~ ~ 8.
c::
Ë ,~
E~
'" :t::
~ ~
>.'"
11~
~ æ
>,-'
a:I
~ >.:: '- ~ v
~ ~ 5 ~ ~ .~
._ ~.=: ~.~ t::
..=e!J=Cl¡~
';: ~ ;2 E .5 -
- ..u"ö~
'C '~ ¡:¡ :1 ~ g
, <: <> ~ E '<;0
"E _2 .D._ ::I <>
--u>-o'-
]~~ët::-
, ,- ..c ::I 0 0
~~§ouEg
"" 0 0
c:: , 0 E <>
:;J<>ci':::o~
:: ua-~-
... \0 ~ Cl,) ~
>"".D..o
o § ~ a ~ tl ~.~ U
u"'''~>''-oEC:
,,¡:: .. ..... '" Cl¡'c Po
;;~':::oo~u.,e:::s -- ~ U >. OJ _ 0.. ~
""'..... .. -':: .. :::s ~ E û
~ >,2U ~:;- 8-=
~.c~~",E~o<>
ot)-o ~ ã c 0 ~ - ~
('(J .- ~ - -
::I~C:<>""u=~"¡::
Cl¡ :I .- ~ "'" E 0 .c ~
c:..::>E... ",tJ",,,,
...;.;gï::-o~-o ul! <>-5
c: I.r.t~< tU C=:n-;:¡ b ~
~-õ:i;;çt~§g¡r;~
<>F-=-=E_>.~
~ t-.;; ::I :g ¡r; E ¡:¡ 0 .~
~ s8~~¡:: E¡S §
NOTICE OF MEET/NO CHANGg
JEFF"'SON COUNTY
BOARD OF HEALTH
The Jefferson County BOard of
Health will be meeting on Mon-
day; February 12, 2001 from2:OO
p.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the Jefferson
County Heálth Department, 615
Sheridan Avenue, Port Town-
send, WA 98368.
Next month the regularly
scheduled meeting date will be
resumed which is the third Thurs- .
day of each month. 3015m 02f1
- ----
-- - --
Affidavit of Publication
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
55
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON)
SCOTT WILSON. being sworn, says he is the publisher of the Port
Townsend Jefferson County Leader, a weekly newspaper which has
been established. published in the English language and circulated
continuously as a weekly newspaper in the town of Port Townsend in
said County and State, and for general circulation in said county for
more than six (6) months prior to the date of the first publication of the
Notice hereto attached and that the said Port Townsend Jefferson
County Leader was on the 27th day of June 1941 approved as a legal
newspaper by the Superior Court of said Jefferson County and that
annexed is a true copy of the
Meeting Change; Feb. 12, 2001
as it appeared in the regular and entire Issue of said paper itself not in
a supplement thereof for a period of one
consecutive weeks,
beginning on thenh-day of Fl'!hrl1;:!ry ,20..íll....-.
& ending on the --1.thday of Fp.hrlll'lry ,20..íll....-.
and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers
during all of this period. That the full amount of $ 21 . 00
has been paid in full. at the rate of $9.50 ($9.00 for legal notices re~
ceived electr
tion.
Publisher
Subscribed and sworn to before me this=.Lday of Fe brl1àry
.-"-"-.. ,--
20a .-.- -,~ :,/)
4Jd~~
() - -No~'~ PUhlicin and for the State f Washington
- - -- residing at Port Hadlock