Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout032320_ca07 Department of Public Works O Consent Agenda Page 1 of 1 Jefferson County Board of Commissioners Consent Agenda Request To: Board of Commissioners Philip Morley, County Administrator From: Monte Reinders P.E., Public Works Director/ County Engineer/it. Agenda Date: March 23, 2020 Subject: Digital Submittal Certification - County Road Administration Board - Reports for 2019 Statement of Issue: The County Road Administration Board (CRAB) requires the periodic submittal of forms and documents related to Jefferson County's management of its road system and road fund. By April 1, 2020, the County must submit the following in digital format: (1) Traffic Law Enforcement Expenditure Certification, (2) Fish Passage Barrier Removal Certification, (3) Annual Certification (with attachments), (4) Annual Construction Report, (5) County Arterial Preservation Report, and (6) Maintenance Management Certification. The first three of these items,(See Attached), requires the certification of the Chair of the Board of Commissioners via signatures on a "Digital Submittal Certification" form for mailing to CRAB. Analysis / Strategic Goals / Pros £t Cons: CRAB establishes Standards of Good Practice for the administration of the County roads program and road fund. CRAB monitors compliance with these standards via the County's regular submittal of data and certifications. The County Engineer and Board of Commissioners must certify that required standards are being met. Annual issuance of a "Certificate of Good Practice" from CRAB is required in order for the County to receive its annual Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax allocation. Fiscal Impact/Cost Benefit Analysis: Public Works has prepared the required documents with assistance from the Auditor's office and the Sheriff's office. The Certificate of Good Practice is required to receive Jefferson County's annual allocation of approximately $1.5 million in Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax. Recommendation: Authorize the Chair to sign and date the "Digital Submittal Certification" form in the two places for the signature of "Chair / Executive." Return to Public Works for processing. Department Contact: Monte Reinders P.E., Public Works Director/County Engineer 385-9242 Reviewet Philip ode'', ..'ty ministrator Date 2/27/2020 Jefferson County Reports for 2019 Digital Submittal Certification for Forms Due April 1st 0 The documents checked below are hereby submitted from Jefferson County for the review and acceptance of the County Road Administration Board. 6 2019 RAP Certification of Diversion and Road Fund Expenditures for Traffic Law Enforcement I hereby certify that the ab.ve report is true and accurate and that I have reviewed and approved the report for submission to the County Road Administration Board in- cordance with WAC 136. Signed: / Date:31y ZOZD County Sheri.' / / J r r Si••ed:� %. A_s. .. Date:3 -5 •262.0 County •uditor Signed: Date: Chair/Executive O 2019 Certification of Road Fund Expenditures for Fish Passage Barrier Removal O 2019 Annual Certification I hereby certify that the Fish Passage Removal and Annual Certifications are true and accurate and that I have reviewed and approved the report for submission to the County Road Administration Board in accordance with WAC 136. Signed: Date: Chair/Executive Signed: Date:fl‘'Za County E Q�2019 Annual Construction Report (3/2019 County Arterial Preservation Report 121"2119 Maintenance Management Annual Certification I hereby certify that the Annual Construction Report,County Arterial Preservation Report,and Maintenance Management Certification are true and accurate and •- e reviewed,approved,and submitted said reports to the County Road Administration Board in accordance with WAC 136. Si ed: 3r Date: 4 •/4 '26 Coun gin- •- 3/3/2020 Jefferson County 2019 CERTIFICATION OF DIVERSION AND ROAD FUND EXPENDITURES FOR TRAFFIC LAW ENFORCEMENT WAC 136-150-022 Total Road Levy: Budgeted Road Levy revenue (as listed on the Road Levy Certification -WAC 136-150- $4,538,747.00 021): Actual Road Levy revenue produced: $4,541,460.00 Road Levy Diversion: Budgeted Road Levy Diversion (as listed on the Road Levy Certification - WAC 136-150- $720,000.00 021): Actual amount of Diverted Road Levy: $720,000.00 Was Diverted Road Levy deposited in a specific and identifiable account (RCW Yes 36.82.040): Traffic Law Enforcement Paid by Road Fund Expenditures: Budgeted cost reimbursements and/or operating transfers from the Road Fund: $0.00 Actual total amount of cost reimbursements and/or operating transfers from the Road $0.00 Fund: Total Road Portion Traffic Law Enforcement Expenditures: $720,000.00 Total Traffic Law Enforcement Expense (ALL COUNTY FUNDS): $1,395,912.00 RCW 36.79.140 provides that only those counties that during the preceding twelve months have spent all revenues collected for road purposes only for such purposes, including traffic law enforcement, as are allowed by Article II, Section 40 of the Washington State Constitution, are eligible to receive funds from the Rural Arterial Trust Account. This form must be reviewed and certified (on the "Engineer's Certification Form") by: • County Sheriff • County Auditor OR Charter designated Chief Financial Officer • Chair, Board of County Commissioners OR County Executive C.A.R.S. https://www.crab.wa.gov/cars/ FISH PASSAGE CERTIFICATION WAC 136-150-023 Submitting County: Jefferson Budget Year: 2019 Fish Passage Barrier Removal Projects Total Cost % of Total Cost Project Outside of (25% Allowed Project Name Cost ROW by WAC) Salmon Creek $99,280.90 $0.00 0.00% Bridge - W. Uncas Road Thorndyke Creek - $115,089.23 $0.00 0.00% Thorndyke Road MP4.71 Naylors Creek - $69,770.07 $0.00 0.00% Gibbs Lake & W. Valley Rds. Total Expenditures for Fish Passage Barrier Removal Outside County. Rights-of-Way. Total Annual Road Construction Budget: $2,910,100.00 X 0.005 1/2% of Total Annual Road (Limit of"Outside of Right-of- =$14,550.50 Way" expense) Total Expenditure for Fish Passage Barrier Removal $0.00 Outside County Right-of-Way RCW 36.79.140 provides that only those counties that during the preceding twelve months have spent all revenues collected for road purposes only for such purposes, 1 of2 3/17/2020,3:55 PM C.A.R.S. https://www.crab.wa.gov/cars/ including removal of barriers to fish passage and accompanying streambed and stream bank repair as specified and limited by RCW 36.82.070 , as are allowed by Article II, Section 40 of the Washington State Constitution, are eligible to receive funds from the Rural Arterial Trust Account. 2 of 2 3/17/2020, 3:55 PM 3/11/2020 Jefferson County Annual Certification For Calendar Year 2019 WAC 136-04 MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION A. During 2019 the County Engineer performed the duties and had the responsibilities specified in RCW 36.80.030. Yes B. At any time during 2019 was there a vacancy/change in the position of County Engineer?If so,were the procedures in WAC 136-12 followed? C. The processing of County Road Accident Reports during 2019 complied with WAC 136-28. Yes D. Priority Programming techniques were applied to the ranking of all potential projects on the arterial road system in 2019 per Yes WAC 136-14-020. E. As of December 31, 2019 the management of the county road department was in accordance with policies set by the county legislative authority including, but not limited to,the following specific policies required by WAC 136-50-050: *Has your agency sent the most recently adopted version to CRAB WAC 136-50-051? POLICY WAC DATE OF CURRENT VERSION Re: Organization 136-50-051 12/09/2019 Re: Personnel Practices 136-50-052 05/20/2019 Re: Complaint Handling 136-50-053 07/28/2003 Re:Work for Others 136-50-054 04/23/2018 Re: Utility Accommodation 136-50-055 01/03/2000 Re: Priority Programming 136-14-030 04/30/2015 F. The following were submitted to CRAB in a timely manner: DOCUMENT WAC DUE DATE DATE OF ADOPTION I PREPARATION DATE SENT TO CRAB 19 Six-Year Program 136-15-050 31-DEC-18 11/05/2018 12/12/2018 19 Annual Construction Program 136-16-040 31-DEC-18 12/10/2018 12/18/2018 '19 CAPP Program 136-300-060 31-DEC-18 12/10/2018 12/12/2018 '19 Road Fund Budget 31-DEC-18 12/10/2018 12/12/2018 '19 Maintenance Management Work 136-11-040 31-DEC-18 12/10/2018 12/12/2018 Plan&Budget '19 Road Levy 136-150-021 01-FEB-19 01/28/2019 01/29/2019 '18 Certification of Diversion and 136-150-022 01-APR-19 03/25/2019 03/26/2019 Road Fund Exp. For Traffic Law Enforcement '18 Engineer's Certification of Fish 136-150-023 01-APR-19 03/25/2019 03/26/2019 Barrier Removal Costs '18 Certification of Road Fund Exp. 136-150-025 01-APR-19 for Marine Navigation and Moorage '18 Annual Construction Report 136-16-050 01-APR-19 03/25/2019 03/26/2019 '18 CAPP Report 136-300-090 01-APR-19 03/25/2019 03/26/2019 18 Maintenance Management 136-11-050 01-APR-19 03/25/2019 03/26/2019 Certification '18 Annual Certification 136-04-030 01-APR-19 03/25/2019 03/26/2019 '18 Road Log Update 136-60-030 01-MAY-19 04/19/2019 04/19/2019 '19 PMS Certification for CAPA 136-70-070 31-DEC-19 12/13/2019 12/16/2019 Eligibility G. Projects to which construction expenditures were charged were all on the originally adopted 2019 Annual Program or as Yes amended per WAC 136-16-042-Attach Amendments. (If No, please attach a brief explanation.) H. The County's construction by county forces limit for 2019 computed in accordance with RCW 36.77.065: $1,262,255.00 The actual expenditure for construction by county forces as reported in the 2019 Annual Const. Report: $0.00 J. As required by WAC 136-20-060, a written Bridge and Inspection Report for 2019 was furnished to the legislative authority on 11/12/2019 (attach a copy): #of NBI Bridges as of December 31, 2019: 35 I/ 1 le• 4 i .1"It.. .411 Ao...* 1 tfig /1-....`• t. ut:',.i 4. ,I, i •• ',1,,, ^ . '.":" .. , 0, ' I "4,1., 4 0 •••• :!"' 4444iv ,..,t ':i .," ' •t*" ',14 4.!, .4*'.. •" ''ti ..,ii 0. ' '•r"..'''',',,'' ,"..''Y.4 1 .1 , ,,- . , ‘ I • iii;•• Al ,..-• `. 4 " '-'.4 idl• 4 Pt' • P i'l..' t• a • - Q. . .: .1 i.c., -tor:- " L • . , Ilk:%Al ' '"*.e. i • 1 '.‘'ti' ik:',..ir.',01',Q.,5 atf th' ;44.41", -, * -.. .„ i •.. - J - t*. tit - • ,, ,,,•• , 4/01i, q. .. , , :,e,,,..: !... -Lir, , fr _ __ : ',4 4 4 4:'.• • 7: '':..., . • _.,_ r- --•-- - ':".11:11- 7:--- . - ;-• ,,„. 7 ., -'--1 7------4— '------ - - ---`-- —1-------- — A . _ 4 _,(..„_—__ ,,....___. ____ , __ .,.., ,,,... ., . , - .6-4-.,.i----..,:e...--4---- .,---.- ---Am - - ........,.. -.... ..—... c.:• f . Iaot....sa.,.._ w.-51_11...-C-45......--1-11.... -.. . • ,t as Ar: ___...-----...........,06,,,• ,.„\ -k--1—=. .4:44,-.1 Z---..--... , .; '.: - • . . -I** 6s, -'..,...-,:-. ''''' f. ' :.' .4'i-- •. 4. 7.‘''-...4..4'.` ' 1-.•*Nil.' ...- . ... r -- •- • •. ....., .4. ....- . :- -- • ... .447-t... • ' *•%•..-.Zoil„-. • -1;.; .'''' :":ft. .••*."'......4 :•;•••••••,• -*. ••• ; : •••.,,;, ..- •:-= ' 4 •-...•"-- .' 4?•i• V "=•"&" •"A"..•: * . • • - . - • ..- . - - - :•'-: ris'-'''.2-1‘344,"411.1.: ''. - '' - - -* - - . .- ...-...... -,4.."4%.: :51--•.. .4.0,-. • ., .• -.--,, * ......' ....., -• 44 •.4:-.;4.... -, --.' -''''-, k..44-* ....2„w ...• • • •'t. •.••.4,....z. -- 1..-•:"-4.40.4...„A,. ''' ! "7". " . ' •", -Lt.'"-.z.•• '',......- -• -. - •%.t-1:•••ii"'4C:j...•;.,,,:_liir"' 7."... 1.0-14iil-FA"".'..-:47.4. -.."''r "..: -PA.''''',..71'- • • ; ' ' ' .rt....,...,, ;. ''.,--,A. .1*u- ,,,-' , • .,, ' $ AW s .5 .'' ..001,441." .4: ••••.... ,. Annual Bridge Condition Report 2019 Jefferson County, Washington ,i,s,..50N co6, i ....., .. _ .-, l's'lirNC;\ This page is intentionally left blank. JEFFERSON COUNTY 2019 ANNUAL BRIDGE CONDITION REPORT Approved by: .-� —'� 4'7/Y Monte Reinders, P.E. Public Works Director/County Engineer Prepared by: Mark Thurston, P.E. Lead Bridge Inspector/ Engineer III This page is intentionally left blank. INTRODUCTION Inspections Standards. Two of the bridges do not meet the federal bridge definition, one because it As required by WAC 136-20-060, "Each county is a pedestrian bridge, and one because it has less engineer shall furnish the county legislative than a twenty foot span; nevertheless, these two authority with a written report of the findings bridges are on Jefferson County's biannual bridge of the bridge inspection effort. This report inspection program. Jefferson County also has shall be made available to said authority and two permanently closed bridges, which are not shall be consulted during the preparation of listed on the Master Bridge List. the proposed six-year transportation program revision. The report shall include the county engineer's recommendations as to replacement, BRIDGE INSPECTIONS repair or load restriction for each deficient The National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS) bridge. The resolution of adoption of the six-year and WAC 136-20-030 mandate that public transportation program shall include assurances agencies inspect and report on all bridges at to the effect that the county engineer's report least once every two years (routine inspection). with respect to deficient bridges was available Jefferson County staff performs all routine to said authority during the preparation of the inspections. Special inspections are required for program. It is highly recommended that deficient bridges that cannot be inspected adequately short span bridges, drainage structures, and large from the ground. For these bridges an Under culverts be included in said report" Bridge Inspection Truck (UBIT) is required. Steel bridges with fracture critical members may also BRIDGE INVENTORY require special inspections with the UBIT and/ or other special equipment. Jefferson County has two bridges which require the UBIT inspection Types of Bridges in Jefferson County and one bridge which requires both the UBIT and the fracture critical inspection (identified in the attached Master Bridge List).Jefferson County currently has a contract with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT)to perform these inspections. 1 . Bridge Age by Decade ■ ; 4 1.Z 0 z m 5 �� Qc Jefferson County Public Works has 35 active bridges—see the attached Master Bridge List (Appendix A) for a listing of the county bridges. Of these, 33 bridges meet the federal definition of a bridge and are subject to the National Bridge o ,; x _989 1990 °99 20J0 2019 Bridge Condition Report 3 Jefferson County Public Works has split up the on regular monitoring, the streambed elevation bridge inspections so that East Jefferson County has been relatively stable since 2008. Public bridges are inspected in odd-numbered years Works will continue to monitor this situation. and West Jefferson County bridges are inspected The Tower Creek Bridge is scheduled to be in even-numbered years. In conformance with replaced in 2020-2021 by the Federal Highway that schedule,Jefferson County completed the Administration Western Federal Lands Division, biennial inspections for all East Jefferson County and is being funded entirely by a Federal Lands bridges in 2019. The completed inspection Access Program grant. reports were submitted to WSDOT, which verifies compliance with the NBIS and reports to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). ti ' Y7-4 • DEFICIENT BRIDGES .r All bridges are assigned a sufficiency rating (SR), which is a calculated score based on numbers d 5~ assigned to all of the bridge elements reviewed ; ! by the bridge inspector. The SR is a number from Ate . 0 to 100, with 100 being an entirely sufficient ... � ,r — icer bridge, and 0 being an entirely insufficient bridge. ' For additional explanation of the sufficiency NM* '„ $` rating and other ratings see the attached WSDOT Tower Creek Bridge publication, Bridges and Structures—Ratings (Appendix B). The sufficiency rating is used POSTED BRIDGES to determine if a bridge is eligible for federal rehabilitation or replacement funding. Under All bridges are required to have a "Load Rating" the current funding requirements, to be eligible calculation.The Load Rating establishes how for replacement a bridge must be structurally much weight the bridge can carry for several deficient and have a sufficiency rating of less standard configurations of vehicle axle loads. If than 40; to be eligible for rehabilitation a the load rating calculation shows that a bridge bridge must be structurally deficient and have a cannot safely carry one or more of the legal sufficiency rating of less than 80. Currently, none vehicle axle load configurations, then the bridge of the county's bridges meet these criteria, and must be posted with the appropriate load limits. therefore none are eligible for rehabilitation or Jefferson County currently has two bridges that replacement. require load posting, Meyers Bridge on Belfrage Road and Hemphill Creek Bridge on Dowans As described in previous Bridge Condition reports, Creek Road. Public Works is currently in the the Tower Creek Bridge is being monitored for process of posting these bridges. In addition, potential scour problems associated with down- the load rating calculations for the Yarr Bridge, cutting of the streambed. The Tower Creek on Center Road, indicate that it should be streambed experienced significant down-cutting posted for a number of legal vehicles. However, in 2007-2008 due to migration of the Hoh River the bridge has been carrying normal traffic for and heavy flows in Tower Creek. However, based an appreciable length of time and shows no 4 2019 Bridge Condition Report distress. In accordance with the Manual for additional twenty-two bridges will need to be Bridge Evaluation (published by the American re-load rated prior to the 2022 deadline. It is Association of State Highway and Transportation possible that some Jefferson County bridges will Officials), and as recommended by the WSDOT need to be load posted for SHV's after the load Local Programs Bridge Engineer,Jefferson County rating results are known. is following a plan of increased inspection frequency as an acceptable alternative to load posting. Public Works inspects the Yarr bridge OVERWEIGHT/OVERSIZE VEHICLE on a 12 month frequency, as opposed to the PERMITTING PROCESS standard 24 month frequency, and intends to continue with this plan, provided that the bridge Public Works is in the process of refining the continues to show no signs of distress. overweight/oversize vehicle permitting process. A policy was written to help ensure that consistent V v x _- procedures are used in processing permits, and >' g ,1!•' >�, a new, more detailed application form has been . -.;;i:44,-..- tip. ,f� r developed. The new application form, along with Iftwl „� t j 0� associated webpage updates, will be deployed before the end of the year. — ric r:71 I artnTir 1,e1., ,,,1 ,,,„ I. n,,u A MUM INVORMATION I I /, 1-11111110611111111 y1 SRP INVO&MATION 1 __ _ -VIRCLRINVORAIATION Yarr Bridge I. .M A 2013 FHWA mandate requires that all bridges F > be load rated for a relatively new class of Ma ,_ pHauling (SHV). • .. 1H I . o vehicle, the Specialized Vehicle SHV . Io ❑ - I � RESTRICTIONS MAeIRem C. yt.ONO) SHV's are closely-spaced multi-axle single unit °• , trucks introduced by the trucking industry in a ---: the last decade. Examples include dump trucks, construction vehicles, solid waste trucks and ;77-eA ". °' W.." - .M_ .,._"._.. other hauling trucks. The FHWA has divided bridges into two categories, with the first .,c..:,...., v'"r" ' '°a"' ::'..;:t7=-------"--t....,.......,,,... category requiring updated load ratings by December 31, 2017, and the second category Overweight/Oversize Vehicle Permit requiring updated load ratings by December 31, 2022. Prior to the 2013 mandate, Jefferson County already had eight bridges with load OBSOLETE BRIDGES ratings that met the new FHWA requirements. Jefferson County has completed new load ratings The Old Little Quilcene Bridge and the Maple for three bridges for the 2017 deadline. An Creek Bridge have been placed in obsolete status 2019 Bridge Condition Report 5 and removed from the Master Bridge List. Both COMPLETED PROJECTS are permanently closed to vehicular traffic. This action removes the requirement for biennial An 80 foot span concrete bridge at West Uncas Rd bridge inspection. MP 0.804 was completed and opened to traffic in December 2018. In May 2019, a bridge opening ceremony was held to thank the grant agencies EMERGENCY REPAIRS AND and stakeholders, and to name the bridge after INSPECTIONS a long-time local resident, Wally Bowman. The project was funded by a Salmon Recovery No emergency repairs or inspections were Funding Board grant (approx. 85%), a National performed in 2019 at the time of this report. Fish Passage Program grant (approx. 10%), and local funds (approx. 5%). MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES - : Routine maintenance of the county's bridges is e r` ' 2 Yr" ` k i1 conducted by the road maintenance department. - ►p" .. .., ;: • • Typical routine maintenance consists of deck • ,:,•;.. ; ; *. � i t s ` • t • cleaning, brush clearing, and minor miscellaneous � ' ' , " ' ' �; {Ak's repairs. ,�„i;i .- __ ,r,,... -- r': x In April 2019, the County applied for $90,830 in •, •� ',. l a F • Bridge Replacement Advisory Committee (BRAC) ,,',X4(4,-...., .'�►' ' ,-. ._e•. funds for a preventative maintenance project on `A the Hurst Creek Bridge, Clearwater Road milepost ..--Ar'° - 2.66. The Hurst Creek Bridge has concrete girders with steel diaphragms between the girders at mid-span. The steel diaphragms are in need of Wally Bowman Bridge repainting or replacement. In September 2019 we learned the project would not be funded through BRAC, so an alternative funding source will need CURRENT PROJECTS to be found. Current projects include the following: Upper Hoh Road/Olympic National Park Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) Project: Design is nearly complete on a new 120 ft. long • _ concrete bridge to replace the existing bridge tc. at Tower Creek, Upper Hoh Road milepost 7.5. t. This project is being managed by the Federal Highway Administration Western Federal Lands ` .7 Division, and is funded entirely by a FLAP grant. i Construction is scheduled for 2021 2022. x� ' a.d i ,! jt • 0,, Design is nearly complete on a new 120 ft. long 4;, ,4,0r . .a.'�-_., __ i;_ •`°; �'._, 4, concrete bridge to replace the culvert at Canyon Underside of Hurst Creek Bridge Creek, Upper Hoh Road milepost 10.0. This 6 2019 Bridge Condition Report project is being managed by the Federal Highway The fish-barrier culvert at West Valley Road Administration Western Federal Lands Division, milepost 2.59 (Naylor Creek) will be replaced and is funded entirely by a Federal Lands Access with a new structure most likely meeting bridge Program grant. Construction is scheduled for criteria. Public Works has secured grant funding 2021-2022. from the FBRB for project design, and has begun the preliminary design process. Public Works plans to apply for construction funds from the f ( (( . r) FBRB in 2020 and construct the project in 2022- 2023. _ v PROGRAMMED PROJECTS IThe following potential bridge projects are programmed in the 2020-2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP): i awl "° Replacement of the culvert at Center Road milepost 3.26 (Chimacum Creek) with a fish- passable structure, which will most likely meet Preliminary Canyon Creek Bridge drawing the criteria for a bridge, given the stream width. Re-load rating of 22 county bridges, as described The fish-barrier culverts at Thorndyke Road previously in this document. milepost 4.71 (Thorndyke Creek) will be replaced Two or more heavy maintenance projects are with a new bridge. Public Works has secured anticipated during the period 2020-2025, and are grant funding from the Fish Barrier Removal identified as Countywide Bridge Improvements in Board (FBRB) for project design and has begun the TIP. With 35 bridges in its inventory, and half the preliminary design process. Public Works of them around 50 years old, the county has to plans to apply for construction funds from the plan and budget for ongoing maintenance, in FBRB in 2020 and construct the project in 2021- addition to capital projects. Potential 2022. maintenance projects include pile bracing/ stiffening at Contractor's Creek Bridge, and -,z r repainting of the steel girders at Cassel Creek _ , Bridge. Ty RECOMMENDED PROJECTS Hurst Creek Bridge steel diaphragm re repainting/ p g/ — replacement, as described under maintenance activities. map...' Culvert at Naylors Creek 2019 Bridge Condition Report 7 This page is intentionally left blank. APPENDIX A Jefferson County Public Works Master Bridge List LAST UPDATED: 9/4/19 Total number of bridges in inventory: 35 Total number of permanently closed bridges: 2 Total number of active bridges: 35 Total number of West Jefferson County bridges: 19 active bridges 1 short-span(non NBIS)bridge I permanently closed bridge Total number of East Jefferson County Bridges 14 active bridges 1 pedestrian(non NBIS)bridge 1 permanently closed bridge Jefferson County Public Works Master Bridge List Last Updated:9/4/2019 East Jefferson County co z W F U O a U u°ici w z F w BRIDGE TYPE F Z } er a COa .7 m F EA E m W W u P w a . z z z F-, W z G OM CO 4 W. O (j F V FO oY4 z dC LA O t O O , n 2 i § p O z 'h r... O m U z 0 0 X , Y ", F 4g cc cc Superstructure Substructure 7996700 15E Hunts 634509 Hunt Rd. 0.15 27 Reinforced Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 1971 4/16/19 88.92 24 Slab C.I.P.conc.piles 8165100 I6E Little 931507 Center Rd. 14.6 64 Reinforced Conc. Conc.Pile cap, 1955 4/16/19 59.75 FO 24 Quilcene Slab,Conc.Girder Prestress.Conc. River piles 8464900 17E Yarr 931507 Center Rd. 3.44 25 Conc.Multiple Web Conc.Abutment w/ 1955 4/16/19 64.61 12 Girder Prestress.Conc. piles 8320300 23E Linger 301309 Linger 0.42 81 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 1969 4/16/19 70.03 24 Longer Longer Rd. Bulb-T Girder Conc.column over C.I.P.conc.piles 8381400 24E Rocky 250008 Dosewallips 3.01 47 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 1964 4/16/19 76.99 24 Brook Rd. Bulb-T Girder Conc.Spread footing 8229900 25E Meyers 503409 Belfrage 0.12 30 Timber Timber abutment, 1977 6/26/19 63.58 24 Rd. timber piles 8488200 26E West Uncas 500209 West Uncas 1.89 61 Reinf.Conc.Slab Conc.Abutment, 1964 4/16/19 82.17 24 Rd. Conc.column over C.I.P.conc.pile 8136900 28E Leland 344009 Rice Lake 0.33 32 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment, 1987 4/16/19 88.20 FO 24 Creek Rd. Slab Conc.spread footing 8660000 29E Contractors 501409 Old 3.56 294 Timber Deck, Conc.Pile cap,steel 2000 7/13/18 86.41 24 UBIT EVERY 4 YEARS— Creek Gardiner Timber Girders piles LAST UBIT 7/13/2016 Rd. Page 1 of 2 Jefferson County Public Works Master Bridge List Last Updated:9/4/2019cra East Jefferson County z a wiz u ^ U z 4 Q b m6.3 C5 � F a BRIDGE TYPE U , aF 0 ci co oaG cta x F Q C > a s m a a = m rst . F U F W F' U Q a Z F., G E w F F OG a' z U F U U F. Y _ U z s ode :I n a Q - cn ? F z X s Superstructure Substructure 8754000 31E Shine Creek 447608 South Point 0.25 70 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 2005 4/16/19 97.58 24 Rd. Slab Conc.Pile 8753900 32E Donovan 327508 E Quilcene 0.77 70 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 2006 4/16/19 89.28 24 Creek Rd. _Slab Conc.Pile 8753800 33E Old Tarboo 357509 Old Tarboo 0.88 42 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 2005 4/16/19 89.98 24 Rd. Slab steel piles 8753800 38E Andrews 352909 Snow Creek 3.78 24 Conc.3-sided Box Conc.Spread 2014 4/16/19 91.14 24 Creek Rd. Culvert Footing 8898600 41E RTMT 352909 Rick 0.17 80 Steel Thru Truss Conc.Spread 2017 4/30/19 N/A 24 Pedestrian Tollefson Footing Mem.Trail 8902400 42E Wally 500209 West Uncas 0.81 80 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 2018 4/16/19 98.95 24 Bowman Rd. Bulb-T Girder Conc.Pile Page 2 of 2 Jefferson County Public Works Master Bridge List West Jefferson County Last Updated:9/4/2019 m yO Ff.j z h./WI u a z wxi U BRIDGE TYPE F G z E' }O G' ® F O .1 F Z £ F d a F U U g e Z F Z Z Q ay B , u a m F0u r= o� 4 4 °e a z © e az 0.z w U z a a g 0h 0 w O ¢ O Owa w h vi rnit E Superstructure Substructure 8451600 01W Fletcher 911607 Quinault S. 3.19 78 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 1974 5/22/18 99.50 24 Creek Shore Rd. Bulb-T Girder C.I.P.cone.pile 8258500 02W Barlow 134309 Oil City Rd. 9.75 64 Prestress.Conc.Slab Conc.Abutment w/ 2005 5/22/18 83.53 24 C.I.P.Conc.Pile 8145800 03W Anderson 134309 Oil City Rd. 4.44 87 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 1974 5/22/18 90.43 24 Creek Bulb-T Girder C.I.P.cone.pile 8280100 04W Hell Roaring 914207 Upper Hoh 0.16 120 Prestress.Conc. 'Conc.Abutment w/ 1982 5/23/18 91.88 24 Creek Rd. Girder steel H pile 8298800 05W Alder Creek 914207 Upper Hoh 2.07 67 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 1972 5/23/18 99.59 24 Rd. Bulb-T Girder C.I.P.cont.pile 8383600 06W Rock Creek 914207 Upper Hoh 6.49 83 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 1973 5/23/18 92.80 24 Rd. Bulb-T Girder C.I.P.cont.pile 8384000 07W Tower Creek 914207 Upper Hoh 7.5 71 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 1973 5/23/18 92.80 24 Rd. Bulb-T Girder C.I.P.conc.pile 8391000 08W Queets River 107509 Clearwater 0.6 844 Steel Plate Girder, Conc.Piers,Conc. 1988 7/11/16 98.71 24 UBIT EVERY 4 YEARS— Rd. C.I.P.conc.deck Abutment w/steel H LAST UBIT 7/11/2016 pile 8047800 09W Hemphill 146809 Dowans 2.3 31 Timber Deck, Timber abutment, 1977 5/22/18 60.39 24 Creek Creek Rd Timber Girders timber piles 7966600 IOW Dowans 146809 Dowans 0.52 81 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment w/ 1974 5/22/18 93.79 24 Creek Creek Rd. Bulb-T Girder C.I.P.conc.pile Page 1 of 2 Jefferson County Public Works Master Bridge List West Jefferson County Last Updated:9/4/2019 a m =� Ez a' Z U C.).4 z e zz W. m Z �jLC GO la 1:4 BRIDGE TYPE F a, Z F O p d 1,4E. h 04 U E 141 z E'-C C Si o < o a g Si e o azz' 0.o t.. u z a a f a > i y s ria EE Superstructure Substructure 8475700 11W Owl Creek 135109 Maple 1.29 69 Prestress.Conc.Slab Conc.Abutment w/ 1989 5/22/18 83.45 24 Creek Rd. steel H piles FO 8253600 13W Hurst Creek 107509 Clearwater 2.66 67 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Abutment, 1969 5/22/18 98 86 24 Rd. Bulb-T Girder Conc.column,Conc. footing 8339400 27W Willoughby 914207 Upper Hoh 3.52 60 Prestress.Conc. Conc.Pile cap w/ 1962 5 23 18 59.03 24 Creek Rd. Bulb-T Girder Prestress.Conc.piles 8659900 30W Cassel Creek 134309 Oil City Rd. 3.59 154 Steel Girder Conc.Pile cap,steel 2000 7 11 16 72 52 24 Fracture Critical Special Inspection— piles WSDOT performs inspection with X PO UBIT bi-annually 8829800 34W Pole Creek 914207 Upper Hoh 8.3 37 Conc.3-sided Box Conc.Spread 2010 5/23/18 92.80 24 Rd. Culvert Footing 8845600 35W Dismal Creek 914207 Upper Hoh 9.19 22 Conc.3-sided Box Conc.Spread 2011 5/23/18 91.00 24 Rd. Culvert Footing 8853500 36W Spruce Creek 914207 Upper Hoh 9.7 22 Conc.3-sided Box Conc.Spread 2012 5/23/18 92.80 24 Rd. Culvert Footing 8863300 37W Alder Creek 914207 Upper Hoh 2.15 25 Conc.3-sided Box Conc.Spread 2013 5/23/18 91.11 24 Tributary Rd. Culvert Footing 8886600 39W Upper Hoh 914207 Upper Hoh 6.95 21 Conc.3-sided Box Conc.Spread 2016 5/23/18 82.69 24 Rd.MP 6.95 Rd. Culvert Footing XG03070 41E Donkey 107509 Clearwater 1.29 17 Conc.3-sided Box Open-ended steel 2015 5/22/18 24 0 Creek Rd. Culvert pipe piling Page 2 of 2 APPENDIX B WSDOT - Bridges and Structuife.- Ratings Page 1 of 2 Washington State �A/ Department of Transportation Bridge Ratings The safety of bridge structures in Washington State is ensured through a meticulous inspection system. All public bridge owners, such as WSDOT, Counties and Cities, follow the same 4 bridge inspection procedures. The condition rating of all bridge alk 1 decks, superstructures and substructures and other elements ' based based on these inspections. I pi USDOT's Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requires all 4171k- $' '4, . •public bridge owners (state, city, and county ) to inspect and w. their bridges and report information including bridge condition ratings as part of their requirements in the National Bridge Inventory Standards (NBIS). ,- Important aspects of the NBIS were: i V- • 1. All states A �- SR20 Deception Pass Bridge must perform .t t � periodic i inspections • • of bridges greater than 20 feet in span on at least a biennial SR6 Wiliapa River bridge basis. 2. Data collection was standardized and must be reported to FHWA. 3. Qualifications for inspection personnel were defined. 4. Training programs were developed and implemented. 5. The Bridge Replacement Program (BRP) was established to provide funding for bridge replacement on the system. Structurally Deficient Structurally deficient means that a bridge requires repair or replacement of a certain component. This may include cracked or spalled concrete, the bridge deck, the support structure, or the entire bridge itself. If the condition is such that it no longer is able to carry its intended traffic loads it may be weight restricted. Being structurally deficient does not imply that the bridge is in danger of collapse or unsafe to the traveling public. If a bridge is open then it is considered safe. A bridge is classified as"Structurally Deficient"when bridge inspectors give either the superstructure, deck, and/or substructure a rating of four or less on a scale of zero to nine. WSDOT's poor condition category uses the same data, criteria, and rating scale. http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Bridge/Reporting/BridgeRatings.htm 8/14/2015 WSDOT- Bridges and Structures - Ratings Page 2 of.. WSDOT has 137 state owned bridges that are classified as structurally deficient , as of Jan. 2015. A list of these bridges Is available in pdf and web page and map format. • Functionally Obsolete g ¢aka Functional obsoiescence is assessed by comparing the existing ,k design of each bridge to current standards. A bridge can be categorized functionally obsolete a number of ways including: substandard bridge widths, low vertical clearance that can lead to repeated damage from over height trucks, load-carrying capacity,or flood potential. Interstate 82 Columbia River bridge near Umatilla There are 866 WSDOT bridges that are rated"Functionally Obsolete" Good, Fair, Poor Condition Rating Good: A range from no problems to some minor deterioration of structural elements. Fair: All primary structural elements are sound but may have deficiencies such as minor section loss, deterioration, cracking, spalling, or scour. Poor: Advanced deficiencies such as section loss, deterioration, cracking, spalling, scour, or seriously affected primary structural components. Bridges rated in poor condition may be posted with truck weight restrictions. A summary of the WSDOT bridge network conditions is available in the 201.4 Bridge Annual Report in the Gray notebook. Copyright WSDOT CO 2015 http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Bridge/Reporting/BridgeRatings.htm 8/14/2015 VDD Bridge inspection Definitions What are "general condition ratings?" According to the National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS), condition ratings are used to describe an existing bridge or culvert compared with its condition if it were new. The ratings are based on the materials, physical condition of the deck (riding surface), the superstructure (supports immediately beneath the driving surface) and the substructures (foundation and supporting posts and piers). General condition ratings range from 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent). For detailed definitions, click here. Which bridges are included in the NBI system? NBI structures are bridges or culverts that carry vehicular traffic and have an opening longer than 20 feet measured along the center of the roadway. What bridges are not considered part of the NBI system? Non-NBI structures include bridges or culverts that carry vehicular traffic and are equal to or less than 20 feet measured along the center of the roadway. VDOT exceeds the NBI standards by inspecting and documenting in our inventory all bridges regardless of their length and all culverts having an opening greater than 36 square feet. What is a "structurally deficient" bridge? Bridges are considered structurally deficient if they have been restricted to light vehicles, closed to traffic or require rehabilitation. Structurally deficient means there are elements of the bridge that need to be monitored and/or repaired. The fact that a bridge is "structurally deficient" does not imply that it is likely to collapse or that it is unsafe. It means the bridge must be monitored, inspected and maintained. How is "structural deficiency" determined? The condition of different parts of a bridge is rated on a scale of 0 to 9 (with 9 being "excellent" and zero being "failed"). A structurally deficient bridge is one for which the deck (riding surface), the superstructure (supports immediately beneath the driving surface) or the substructure (foundation and supporting posts and piers) are rated in condition 4 or less. What makes a bridge structurally deficient, and are structural deficient bridges unsafe? The fact that a bridge is "structurally deficient" does not imply that it is likely to collapse or that it is unsafe. A "deficient" bridge is one with some maintenance concerns that do not pose a safety risk. A "deficient" bridge typically requires maintenance and repair and eventual rehabilitation or replacement to address deficiencies. To remain open to traffic, structurally deficient bridges are often posted with reduced weight limits that restrict the gross weight of vehicles using the bridges. If unsafe conditions are identified during a physical inspection, the structure must be closed. What is a "functionally obsolete" bridge? A functionally obsolete bridge is one that was built to standards that are not used today. These bridges are not automatically rated as structurally deficient, nor are they inherently unsafe. Functionally obsolete bridges are those that do not have adequate lane widths, shoulder widths, or vertical clearances to serve current traffic demand, or those that may be occasionally flooded. A functionally obsolete bridge is similar to an older house. A house built in 1950 might be perfectly acceptable to live in, but it does not meet all of today's building codes. Yet, when it comes time to consider upgrading that house or making improvements, the owner must look at ways to bring the structure up to current standards. What is a "fracture-critical" bridge? A fracture-critical bridge is one that does not contain redundant supporting elements. This means that if those key supports fail, the bridge would be in danger of collapse. This does not mean the bridge is inherently unsafe, only that there is a lack of redundancy in its design. What is a bridge's "sufficiency rating?" Sufficiency ratings were developed by the Federal Highway Administration to serve as a prioritization tool to allocate funds. The rating varies from 0 percent (poor) to 100 percent (very good). The formula considers structural adequacy, whether the bridge is functionally obsolete and level of service provided to the public. History of Federal Bridge Inspection Program The federal bridge inspection program regulations were developed as a result of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1968 following the collapse of the Silver Bridge in Point Pleasant, West Virginia. The United States Secretary of Transportation established the National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS) to locate and evaluate existing bridge deficiencies to ensure the safety of the traveling public. The 1968 Federal-Aid Highway Act directed the states to maintain an inventory of federal-aid highway system bridges. This was amended over time to establish criteria for NBIS bridges including: • Defining the NBIS to bridges to those on the federal-aid highway system • Requiring inspections of bridges longer than 20 feet on all public roads • Expanding bridge inspection programs to include special inspection procedures for fracture- critical members and underwater inspection El Bridge Condition Code key Code Description N NOT APPLICABLE 9 EXCELLENT CONDITION 8 VERY GOOD CONDITION No problems noted. 7 GOOD CONDITION Some minor problems. 6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION Structural elements show some minor deterioration. 5 FAIR CONDITION All primary structural elements are sound but may have some minor section loss (due to corrosion), cracking, spalling (deterioration of concrete surface) or scour (erosion of soil) 4 POOR CONDITION Advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour. 3 SERIOUS CONDITION Loss of section, deterioration, spalling or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION Advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the bridge until corrective action is taken. 1 "IMMINENT" FAILURE CONDITION Major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Bridge is closed to traffic but corrective action may put back in light service. 0 FAILED CONDITION Out of service - beyond corrective action.