HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAC Inventory Deck. 3.23.20How Green are We?
A greenhouse gas emissions inventory
Jefferson County, Washington
Draft Slides –Revised 3/23/20
The Climate
Action
Committee:
Who are we?
•2008: Citizens publish Inventory of Energy Usage and Associated
Greenhouse Gas Emissions, based on 2005 data.
•2009: City of Port Townsend & Jefferson County form Climate
Action Committee (CAC) to help combat climate change in the
county.
Current Members include:
•City of Port Townsend
•Jefferson County
•Port of Port Townsend
•Jefferson Transit
•2009: City and County adopt greenhouse gas emission reduction
goals.
•2020: 2nd greenhouse gas emissions inventory published. Local
20/20 volunteers perform the study, based on 2018 data:
•Marion Huxtable, Bill Wise, Cindy Jayne, Karen Steinmaus & Tom Engel.
•Two volunteers, Marion Huxtable and Bill Wise, also participated in the first
inventory.
•Rick Jahnke produced the Consumption-Based Model estimate
•Jefferson County Public Utility District #1
•Jefferson Healthcare
•Port Townsend Paper Corporation
•Citizen representatives
2018 Inventory
Measures the smaller
sector circle:
GHG emissions
generated within
Jefferson County; and
Estimates the larger
consumption circle:
GHG emissions
consumers are
responsible for
generated within
Jefferson County and
elsewhere.
Inventory
Results:
First, the
good news!
•Jefferson County reduced its sector-based greenhouse
gas emissions by 40%since 2005.
2005 Metric Tons CO2e 2018 Metric Tons CO2e % Change
Stationary Energy 289,174 86,523
Residential 107,214 12,792 -88.1%
Commercial 44,066 6,286 -85.7%
Industrial 137,894 67,445 -51.1%
Transportation 161,589 181,972 +12.6%
Solid Waste 2,271 1,846 -18.7%
Total 453,034 270,341 -40.3%
How did
Jefferson
County
reduce
sector
emissions so
dramatically
from 2005 -
2018?
The change from Puget
Sound Energy to
Jefferson PUD #1
Port Townend Paper
Mill efficiency
improvements
Change from PSE to
PUD
•In 2013, Jefferson PUD
became the primary
electricity supplier for East
Jefferson County, acquiring
its power from Bonneville
Power Association.
•This change was based on
an initiative approved by
county voters in 2008.
•BPA electricity is primarily
hydropower, a renewable
resource.
•The change created a 98%
reduction in the GHG
emissions intensity of our
electricity.
GHG emissions intensity from
generating electricity
-98%
Port Townsend Paper
Corporation
•Many operational
efficiencies reduced
emissions from Port
Townsend Paper
Corporation (PTPC) by 52%.
•Note that PTPC used BPA
power in 2005; thus the
changes are not related to
changes in the electricity
supplier.
Fuel Type 2005 2018 % Change
Electricity (KWh)6,249 1,911 -69%
Propane (Gallons)912 38,425 4113%
Fuel Oil (Gallons)116,905 22,706 -81%
Wood (BDT)13,012 3,234 -75%
Totals 137,078 66,276 -52%
Jefferson
County
•The 2018 emissions from Jefferson County government
operations decreased 28%from 2005.
•This is well ahead of the goal established for the county
operations for 2020 of an 18% decrease in emissions from
2005 levels.
City Of Port
Townsend
•The 2018 emissions from the City of Port Townsend
government operations decreased 54%from 2005.
•This is well ahead of the goal for city operations for 2020 of an
18% decrease in emissions from 2005 levels.
•The City worked with Jefferson County, Port Townsend School
District and Fort Worden to hire a resource conservation
manager to identify areas for facilities improvements.
Metric Tons CO2e 2005 2018 % Change
Buildings & Facilities 579 365 -37%
Water & Wastewater Treatment 730 26 -96%
Street Lights & Traffic Signals 134 0.9 -99%
Vehicle Fleet 280 284 2%
Employee Commute 87 160 84%
Total 1,809 835 -54%
City of Port Townsend - 2nd IPCC Assessment
Now, the challenging
news
•Transportation accounts for
66%of current GHG
emissions.
•Future reductions in GHG
emissions will require a
focus on transportation, a
difficult challenge in a rural
county.
A closer look at
transportation
stats . . .
•We’re driving more, and there are more
of us since 2005:
•12% increase in population
•19% increase in licensed drivers
•25% increase in registered vehicles
•6.3% increase in miles driven per
capita
•Most common number of motorized
vehicles per household: 2 followed
by 3
Majority
drive gas or
diesel-
powered
vehicles
Passenger Diesel 0.3%
Passenger Gas 59.9%
Motorcycle 0.4%
Light Truck Gas 32.4%
Heavy Truck Diesel 5.2%
Light Truck Diesel 1.5%
Electric Vehicles 0.3%
Vehicle % for Apportioning Miles
Solid waste –
contributes less than
1%
•Our garbage is transported to the
Roosevelt Landfill in Klickitat
County where the methane
produced is largely recovered as an
electricity-generating feedstock.
•Recycling and composting removes
26% of the community’s waste
from the amount sent to the
landfill.
Community Solid Waste Emissions -2018
Location Solid Waste
(tons)
CO2e
(metric tons)
Metric Tons CO2e
per ton of Waste
Roosevelt Landfill 20,672 2462 0.119
Commercial collection 11,058 401 0.036
Self-delivery to Transfer
Station
9,615 196 0.020
Truck to Tacoma2 (wet
short tons)
20,672 366 0.018
Rail to Landfill2 (wet
short tons)
20,672 128 0.006
Total 3553
Agriculture/Forestry
•The report did not measure GHG
associated with growing crops, only animal
husbandry.
•Agriculture contributes 1% of GHG
emissions, with over 90% of those
emissions from beef cattle and calves, the
rest from sheep, goats, horses and swine.
•Jefferson County is comprised primarily of
forest lands. Forests can serve as sources
of GHGs (fires, land use changes,
harvesting) or sinks of GHGs (carbon
stored in trees).
•The 2018 inventory was not able to
accurately determine the extent to which
our forests are either emitting carbon or
sequestering carbon, due to the lack of
detailed county-level forestry data.
Consumption
Based Model-
A more complete
estimate of
residential
emissions
•Uses national data on household energy,
transportation, consumer expenditures +
local census, weather and other data.
•Approximates GHG emissions resulting from
goods and services consumed by
households. Data is available by zip codes.
•It also includes the energy & transportation
emissions counted in our residential sector
inventory.
•Jefferson County residents are associated
with consumption-based emissions of 20.2
metric tons/person.
•This value exceeds the sector-based
emissions estimate by a factor of 2.3.
2018 Estimate:
Jefferson
County
consumption
emissions are
more than twice
our sector
emissions.
2015 Oregon statewide study:
An estimate of how consumption of goods & services, by
category, contribute to greenhouse gas emissions
2015 Oregon
consumption-based
greenhouse gas emissions
–category view
2015 Oregon statewide study:
An estimate of when greenhouse gas emissions occur in the life-
cycle of consumption.
Comparison of pre-purchase, use, and disposal emissions
2015 Oregon consumption-
based greenhouse gas
emissions -lifecycle view
Jefferson
County
Greenhouse
Gas Emissions
Reduction
Goals
•City of Port Townsend and Jefferson
County set goals to reduce emissions from
1990 levels.
•1990 emissions levels were estimated to be
3% below 2005 levels.
•Our 2050 goal: 80% reduction from 1990
levels.
•Results: Today we are 39% below our 1990
emission levels, nearly half-way to our
2050 goal.
•We still have to reduce by another 41% to
reach the 2050 goal.
What’s Next –
Setting New
Goals
•Jefferson County has made good progress
on reducing our GHG emissions locally.
•Further reductions rely on solutions,
particularly in transportation.
•What new goals and timetable should be
set?
•It will be up to all of us to decide that
together.
•The Climate Action Committee will host a
Climate Charette to discuss these
questions in the coming months. Let us
know if you would like to participate.