HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes_062420
Jefferson County/City of Port Townsend
Climate Action Committee
Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, June 24, 2020, 3:30 - 5:30 PM
ONLINE due to COVID
Hosted by Jefferson County Public Health
Members Present: Pamela Adams (City Council), John Bender (Jefferson Transit), Cindy
Jayne, Laura Tucker (Jefferson County Public Health), Cara Loriz, Shelley Jaye, David
Seabrook, Diane McDade, Dave Wilkinson, Kate Dean (BoCC), Jeff Randall (PUD No. 1), Chris
O’Higgins (JGH); Kate Chadwick
Absent: Eric Toews (Port of PT), Sam Jones (Port Townsend Paper Corporation)
Staff: Judy Surber (City of PT), Laura Tucker (Jefferson County)
Guests: None.
Scribe: Judy Surber
Topic Recommendation/Action Follow Up Items
Call to order Chair Cindy Jayne called the meeting to order at 3:32.
A quorum was present.
Approval of
Agenda &
Minutes
Cindy shared the agenda on her screen. Motion to
approve agenda by Chris Higgins, second by Shelley
Jaye. Agenda passed with no one opposed.
Motion to approve minutes of 2/26/2020 by Pam
Adams; second by Shelly Jaye. Passed with no one
opposed.
Laura to post minutes to
County website.
Public Comment No public comment.
Final
Approval of
Greenhouse
Gas Inventory
Report
Cindy asked for any comments and noted she had not
received any comments via email.
Motion to approve Inventory by Kate Chadwick,
seconded by Pam Adams. Motion passed with no
one opposed.
Laura will post on County
website.
Final
Approval of
Cindy noted drafts emailed previously. Pam thanked
those who worked on it and noted Council had
positive comments.
Jeff will forward link to
State’s overview.
CAC
Messaging -
Cindy noted two minor edits to brochure she received
by email – clarify stationary energy sector.
Motion to approve PowerPoint and brochure with the
2 edits by Pam Adams; seconded Jeff Randall.
Passed with no one opposed.
Cindy noted some of the feedback received – good
feedback on change of electricity to BPA power;
questions about how regionally the footprint of power
was impacted by the change. She asked for some
talking points from PUD. Jeff: basically, the concern
is that the “dirty power” just shifted. However,
State’s new clean energy transformation act (CETA)
will require transition to clean power; so, will no
longer be an issue. Addresses 17% of the State’s
GHG emissions. 2022 first milestone – clean energy
plans from utilities 2025: eliminate coal fired power
plants; 2030 GHG neutral (can use limited from
natural gas fired plants if offset by other actions); by
2045 100% clean energy (with no offsets).
Jefferson County’s reporting is straightforward given
PUD is 100% Bonneville Power Administration from
hydroelectric power. So the switch to BPA power
has set up Jefferson County well to meet those new
requirements, and BPA will be looking into what else
is needed.
Discussion ensued. (Tacoma plans for a plant, Clark
County has a gas-powered plant, under CERTA:
existing dams and nuclear power are considered
green; while new dams may not be.)
Jeff noted importance of educating the public on
CERTA and definition of clean energy.
Cindy Jayne did KPTZ interview – focus was on
Local 20/20 but also responded to question re: CAC
inventory. Cindy noted other questions from the
public on the draft inventory report:
Number of electric vehicles.
Burning of wood- international protocols viewed as
carbon neutral. The report (inventory) addresses both
wood burning as both carbon neutral and discloses
the number if it were not considered carbon neutral.
Jeff/Cindy and Diane will
coordinate on key talking
points and responses.
Update on
Roll out to
City and
County
Councils
4/13 Cindy and Diane presented inventory report to
BOCC and Council. Both were positive. Strong
support for charrette as next step.
Pam and Laura noted: Council and BOCC were
interested in next steps and how public would be
engaged in the roll out.
Discuss
Inventory Roll
out Options
Diane: Acknowledged odd timing of roll out
concurrent with pandemic. This cancelled our plans
for the public roll out on Earth Day. It will be a long
time before we can have a large public gathering.
She shared Outreach Ideas for public outreach in the
interim. Slides outlining the strategy were shared.
Ideas include:
- Encourage people to download the report
- KPTZ interviews
- Press releases/articles by members.
- Zoom meetings- gather feedback, report back to the
CAC. Get on agenda of existing community
organizations.
Are there other suggestions? - Laura suggested
presentations (Zoom) to Chamber and service clubs.
Cara noted facts from report is part of it, discussing
post-COVID scenarios also good discussion.
Kate C: schools could be targeted. SeaTac Airport
could serve as model – they had snapshots about
emissions saved by various methods (e.g. public
transit) - educating captive audience. Perhaps
portable billboards at Farmers
Market/Libraries/etc.
Laura: She could help with making information grade
level appropriate for students. She noted nature of
transportation emissions being worldwide.
Could present to School board/all staff meetings
Kate C: provide schools with ready-made materials;
Cautions against any potential to tie emission
reductions to recessions.
Dave S: New task forces under Intergovernmental
Coordination Committee (ICC)
(City/County/Port/PUD); How do we get public
engaged in meetings during COVID other than
relying on websites for meeting?
Jeff: ICC – creating a resiliency response plan. Six
task groups being formed. One of conversations about
restarting economy while reducing carbon emissions.
For example – online meetings. All 4 entities passed
Resolution agreeing to participate. One elected plus
Executives will begin drafting resilience plans; target
to adopt by end of 2020. Next meeting tomorrow.
Dave and Jeff noted food security impact on
emissions and resiliency.
Dave noted, could be easier to find CAC meeting
info. *Pam and Judy noted City has not been posting
- Pam will follow up with John – about including it
on the City’s page/calendar (date and time, for more
info see County site- link). Laura can send info when
she posts/notices on County.
Laura noted Zoom meeting methods for OPMA
compliance.
Newsletters: Cindy asked about using City
newsletter. Pam to follow up with City Manager and
Emily Coler. Jeff noted PUD newsletter contact: Will
O’Donnell, Communications manager.
Cindy noted Hospital may be good place to display
posters— Chris happy to check on this if desired.
Laura suggested Message boards: Chamber
downtown/Carl’s Lumber/ Chimacum
Farmstore/Schools/Chimacum Grange.
Diane asked group for thoughts on messaging –
starting with main call to action is simply awareness
of the inventory. Any new messaging would need
further CAC approval. Judy: may want to follow with
our next steps – watch for meetings or email
comment. Laura will check with County if they can
have central email for inventory comments. Cindy
supportive.
Diane says a web form is another option. Laura
mentioned Survey Monkey. Judy noted, general send
comments to “x” is fine but if developing survey
questions, CAC should vet.
Diane - It’s a timing question.
Pam to follow up with
John M. and Emily Coler
about including
information about the
inventory in the Mayor’s
letter
Laura will check with
County about a central
Laura- we can call a special meeting if needed.
location for email on
inventory comments
ICLEI
Opportunity
for Inventory
Next Steps –
Cohort
Training
2 new opportunities for training. First in July for
emissions modeling. Second is forestry (Sept-
February). Steve King from City will participate in
emissions modeling. Has not heard from County.
Cindy recruiting volunteers – got 3 for the
community wide component. Are there other CAC
organizations interested in participating?
Laura suggested Tami Pokorny for forestry
component.
*Kate Dean joined the meeting (4:49pm).
Possible county staff participants: Mark McCauley,
Tami Pokorny, Mallory Weinheimer, Kevin
Holcomb. Cindy will follow up.
ICLEI software is purchased by City and County.
Volunteers’ names would be provided to Pam/Kate
and Judy/Laura.
Cindy will follow up on
participants for the ICLEI
training sessions
Laura/Judy will approve
for County/City
Potential
NODC Grant
on Climate
Cindy gave overview of NODC and explained the
Planning for Climate Change grant that resulted in the
Climate Prep Plan. A follow up grant that included
adaptation and mitigation looks likely to receive
funding (grant application is referred to as a “Near
Term Action”, NTA). It includes regional (Clallam
and Jefferson Counties) climate mitigation planning,
and working with up to 4 municipalities on
developing local plans integrating both mitigation and
adaptation.
Jefferson County/City of PT CAC could potentially
be 2 of those municipalities. There’s a lot of overlap
with our charrette idea, and perhaps that charrette
could be part of that grant process.
How should the CAC be involved? How does this
mesh with our charrette idea? Any questions?
Judy: noted benefits of regional approach and how
last NODC grant turned out extremely well.
Charrette
Planning
Diane: Given COVID charrette postponed
indefinitely, the grant could create momentum.
Benefits of regional approach and funding. She
recommends that we invest our energy into the
NODC grant process vs. charrette planning.
Cindy: $170,000, requires Puget Sound Partnership
approval.
Kate: it will take a while for it to take shape, but she
sees benefit of regional effort but doesn’t want it to
supplant local effort. We are further along than
Clallam County and don’t want it to slow us down.
Will need to balance.
Cindy: Grant could potentially include convening
Climate Action Committees to discuss inventory and
actionable steps.
Kate Chadwick: If we were to do this - interested in
not losing next steps for the inventory. Wants to be
sure the grant would allow for local groups to
individualize next steps. Overall she is supportive.
Shares Kate Dean’s concern that we are further along.
With the inventory, we know where we are at, but we
need a local strategy.
Kate Dean: doesn’t rule out the possibility of this
grant supporting development of local strategies.
Cindy suggests moving ahead concurrently.
Asked for motion: Cindy/Diane approved as CAC
liaisons for the NODC grant discussions. It was
noted that both City and County have representatives
on the NODC, as do other CAC organizations, and
this CAC liaison would be in addition to the CAC
organizations being directly involved.
Moved by: Pam. Second by Jeff. Motion pPassed.
Upcoming
Organizational
Plans and
Documents for
Climate
Review?
Shoreline Master Plan – Local 20/20 Climate Prep
group is involved in providing input to City SMP.
County SMP will have task force – it was noted Dave
Wilkinson would be a good participant. Kate Dean
supports having CAC member on that committee.
Climate change lens important for this SMP update.
Motion to approve Dave Wilkinson as CAC rep on
County SMP task force: by Kate Chadwick; seconded
by Dave Seabrook. Kate asked if the County email
specifically asked for a CAC representative. Cindy
noted she was invited, but it wasn’t clear in what
capacity. Friendly amendment by Kate: CAC
recommends as possible representative to the task
force. Motion passed.
Public Comment None.
Other Updates None.
Next Steps and
Agenda Planning
Next meeting: 8/26.
Agenda items: Updates on NODC grant process;
outreach. Vision work (Kate C). City and County
SMP progress.
Cindy will forward Local
20/20 SMP comments to
the CAC.
Adjourn The meeting was adjourned at 5:31 p.m.