HomeMy WebLinkAboutBLD2015-00216 - 09 WETLAND DELINEATION Tia Wiltermood �tit(Apo - LiLo
��� C Associates,Inc.
RECEIVF
November 3, 2004 SrP 1
Jonathan & Laura Storm JEFFERSON COUiY OCO
2943 Beaver Valley Road -
Port Ludlow, WA 98365
Re: Wetland Delineation and Categorization for --3.5 acres (Parcel No.821073010) at
2943 Beaver Valley Road, Port Ludlow, Jefferson County, Washington. The
property is located in the NW 1/a, SW '/a of Section 7, Township 28 North, Range 1
West, W.M.
Dear Jonathan and Laura:
The subject parcel was investigated on October 28, 2004. The purpose of this site
investigation was to identify and delineate regulated wetlands, and determine the wetland
category and wetland buffer requirements as defined by the Jefferson County Unified
Development Code. The project proposal is to construct a single family residence on the
subject parcel. The proposed building site is west of the existing mobile home. A
Category II wetland was identified in the western portion of the parcel. The wetland is part
of a large off-site wetland system associated with Ludlow Creek that flows south to Port
Ludlow Bay.
A wetland delineation was completed on October 28, 2003. This letter was prepared to
describe our fmdings and any potential current regulatory implications of these findings on
the proposed project. It includes a detailed description of the data collected to support the
on-site wetland delineation and supporting documentation from the Jefferson County Soil
Survey and National Wetlands Inventory. This delineation was completed using the
Depatli,nent of Ecology Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual
(Publication 96-94), in accordance with the Jefferson County Unified Development Code,
Section 3.6.9. This manual requires the use of the three-wetland parameters of wetland
hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soils to make wetland determinations and all
•
1015 S.W.Harper Road,Port Orchard,Washineton 98367 (360)876-2403 Fax(360)876-2053
• •
RECEIVED
Storm SEr 21"!'
November 3, 2004 CC EEpp np COUNTY p
Page 2 JfFFCi1SU1 COUNTY OC
three must be present for an area under normal circumstances to be considered wetland.
The Routine On-site Determination Method was used to determine the presence or absence
of these parameters because the site is currently under normal circumstances..
SITE DESCRIPTION
The site consists of a rectangular shaped, -3.5 acre parcel located at 2943 Beaver Valley
Road, Port Ludlow, WA. The site slopes gradually down toward a Category II wetland in
the western portion of the property. The wetland extends off-site to the west and is part of
a large wetland system associated with Ludlow Creek. A stream enters the property north
of the driveway, flows north in the roadside ditch and then turns west near the northeast
corner and continues along the northern property line, eventually flowing into Ludlow
Creek and south to Ludlow Bay. The stream is a Type 5 in the eastern portion of the parcel
turning into a Type 4 stream the remaining on-site portion. Per Al Latham, Jefferson
County Conservation District Manager, Ludlow Creek has a natural fish barrier about 200
yards up from Ludlow Bay and the stream, above this blockage, is not a known salmon
bearing stream. Past use of the property appears to be grazing as evidenced by 1988 photos
supplied by the landowner. The on-site portion of the wetland is now dominated by
hardhack and Reed canary grass. The vegetation on the remaining portion of the parcel is
dominated by pasture grasses. The landowners have planted many trees on the property; a
row of cottonwood along the stream and Sitka spruce, Western red cedar.and Douglas fir
trees and others mainly in the southwest portion of the property. An existing single-wide
mobile home is in the southeast corner. An existing shop is located north of this home.
JEFFERSON COUNTY SOIL SURVEY
The on-site soils are mapped as CfC Cassolary sandy loam, 0-15% slopes along the eastern
section, StB Swantown gravelly sandy loam, 0-8% slopes in the central section and Mu
Mukilteo peat in a small area in the western section, according to the Soil Conservation
Service, Soil Survey for Jefferson County Area, Washington, August 1975. Cassolary and
• i
; ECE1VE ..
Storm .,t , � .
November 3, 2004 `` A x""
Page 3 JEFFf RSOt COUNTY OCR.
Swantown are not classified as hydric and do not have inclusions of hydric soil. Mukilteo
is classified as hydric. See enclosed map with site located soil survey and the enclosed soil
descriptions.
NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY
The US Fish and Wildlife Service,National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), Port Ludlow
Quadrangle indicates the presence of a Palustrine, Scrub Shrub, Seasonally flooded (PSSC)
wetland on the eastern portion of the parcel. The NWI also indicates extensive wetlands
west of the parcel that run north and south in the valley. A Palustrine, Open Water,
Permanently flooded (POWH) wetland west of the parcel appears to have been converted
and used as a farm pond with a dam on the southern edge. See enclosed map for site
located on the NWI.
SITE FINDINGS
Eight test plots were completed in the western half of the parcel (see enclosed site map) to
verify the presence or absence of wetland conditions and confirm the boundary delineation.
At each test plot, the soils were examined for the presence of hydric soil conditions and
evidence of hydrologic conditions occurring either in the test hole or on the surface of the
soil. In addition, the percent cover of the dominant plant species,within a 15-foot radius
was recorded at each test hole. A summary of the data findings are provided in this letter.
The summary includes a description of the soil profiles, any evidence of hydrology seen at
the test sites, and the dominant plant species. See enclosed data forms for additional
information concerning the data collected at the individual test plots and enclosed map for
test plot locations.
• •
Storm RECEIVED.
November 3, 2004 r t N
Page 4 S t 1 1 ,a;i6
JEFFERSON COUP' DCD
TEST PLOT DATA
Test Plot#1 is located in upland east of the wetland. The vegetation is dominated by
Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) FAC with lower percentages of tall fescue (Festuca
arundincea) FAC-, Orchard grass,(Dactylis glomerata) FACU and horsetail (Equisetum
arvense) FAC. The soil hole revealed a two layer profile consisting of 8 inch sandy loam
surface horizon(0-8") having a matrix chroma of 10 YR 2/2 with no mottles and a sandy
loam subsurface horizon(8-16") having a matrix chroma of 10 YR 4/2 with 10 YR 4/6
mottles. There was no hydrology present during the field visit and no evidence of wetland
hydrology either on the surface or in the soil profile.
Test Plot#2 is located in the wetland west of Test Plot #1 on the edge of the hardhack. The
vegetation is dominated by hardhack (Spiraea douglasii) FACW, Kentucky bluegrass (Poa
pratensis) FAC, and horsetail (Equisetum arvense) FAC. The soil hole revealed a two
layer profile consisting of a 12 inch sandy Ioam surface horizon (0-12") having a matrix
chroma of 10 YR 3/1 and a sandy loam subsurface horizon(12-16") having a matrix
chroma of 10 YR 4/2 with 10 YR 4/6 mottles. The soil was saturated to the surface.
Test Plot#3 is located in upland east of Test Plot #2; The vegetation is dominated by
Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis)FAC with lower percentages of tall fescue (Festuca
arundincea) FAC- and Orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata) FACU. The soil hole revealed a
two layer profile consisting of an 11 inch sandy loam surface horizon (0-11") having a
matrix chroma of 10 YR 3/3 and a sandy loam subsurface horizon (11-16") having a matrix
chroma of 10 YR 5/2 with 10 YR 4/6 mottles. There was no hydrology present during the
field visit and no evidence of wetland hydrology either on the surface or in the soil profile.
Test Plot 114 is located in upland north of Test Plot #1 and just east of the wetland
boundary. The vegetation is dominated by soft rush (Juncus effusus) FACW, and horsetail
(Equisetum arvense) FAC with lower percentages of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis)
FAC and Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) FACU. The soil hole revealed a two layer
• •
( EIVED
Storm SP 1 2 a6
November 3, 2004
Page 5 JEFFERSON COONS' OCO
profile consisting of an 8 inch sandy loam surface horizon(0-8") having a matrix chroma of
10 YR 2/2 with no mottling and a loamy sand subsurface horizon (8-16") having a matrix
chroma of 10 YR 5/1. The soil was saturated to the surface.
Test Plot#5 is located in upland north of Test Plot#4. The vegetation is dominated by reed
canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) FACW. The soil hole revealed a single layer profile
consisting of a 16 inch sandy loam (0-16") having a matrix chroma of 10 YR 2/2 with no
mottles. There was no hydrology present during the field visit and no evidence of wetland
hydrology either on the surface or in the soil profile.
Test Plot#6 is located in the wetland west of Test Plot#5. The vegetation is dominated by
reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea)FACW, hardback (Spiraea douglasii) FACW and
horsetail (Equisetum arvense) FAC. The soil hole revealed a single layer profile consisting
of 16 inch silt loam(0-16") having a matrix chroma of 10 YR 2/1. The soil was saturated
with water to the surface with water in the test hole at 8 inches.
Test Plot#7 is located in the wetland at the southwest corner. The vegetation is dominated
by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) FACW, horsetail (Equisetum arvense) FAC,
and creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens) FACW. The soil hole revealed a single layer
profile consisting of 16 inch silt loam (0-16") having a matrix chroma of 10 YR 2/1. The
soil was saturated with water to the surface with water seeping into the test hole at 7 inches.
Test Plot #8 is located in the upland area east of Test Plot #7. The vegetation is dominated
by horsetail (Equisetum arvense) FAC, creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens) FACW,
and mowed grass (appeared to be Kentucky bluegrass and tall fescue) with lower
percentages of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) FACW, red alder (Alnus rubra)
FAC, black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera) FAC, and planted, young Douglas fir
(Pseudotsuga menziesii) FACU, Western red cedar (Thuja plicata) FAC and Sitka spruce
(Picea sitchensis) FAC trees. The soil hole revealed a two layer profile consisting of a 10
• •
eEI[E
Storm q7 1 1 L2. is
November 3, 2004
Page 6 JEFFERSON COUNTY UCO
inch sandy loam surface horizon (0-10") having a matrix chroma of 10 YR 2/2 with no
mottles and a loamy sand subsurface horizon (10-16")having a matrix chroma of 10 YR
5/2 with no mottles. There was no hydrology present during the field visit and no evidence
of wetland hydrology either on the surface or in the soil profile.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
The areas sampled at Test Plots 1, 3, 4, 5, and 8 do not meet the wetland criteria because
there is only one positive indicator (hydrophytic vegetation)present for of the three wetland
parameters. The areas sampled at Test Plots 2, 6, 4, and 7 are determined to be wetland
because there are positive indicators present for all three wetland parameters. The
hydrology in Test Plot areas 2, 4, 6, and 7 is from groundwater and seepage and flows west
and southwest.
The delineated wetland is part of a large wetland system that is associated with Ludlow
Creek. Ludlow Creek flows south to Ludlow Bay. The subject parcel is approximately
three miles upstream from the bay. The wetland system appears to have experienced past
farming and grazing disturbances but, in areas where these practices have ceased, the
wetland vegetation is converting back to scrub shrub and forested.
WETLAND CATEGORY, STREAM TYPES, & REGULATORY IMPLICATIONS
The category of the delineated wetland has been determined using the Department of
Ecology's Wetland Rating System for Western Washington, Second Edition, 1993. The
delineated wetland meets the criteria for a Category II wetland because it is a large, diverse
wetland system associated with a stream. Category II wetlands require 100 foot buffers
according to the Jefferson County Unified Development Code, Section 3.6.9. The stream
that flows across the northern edge of the property is a Type 5 in the eastern portion and a
Type 4 in the remaining on-site portion.
• •
�
Ri 1 . �tp' t�I 1I I.
ii
Storm
Page 7
November 3, 2004 JEFFERSON COUN 'Y OCR
Type 5 streams require a 50 foot buffer and Type 4 streams require a 100 foot buffer
according to the Jefferson County Unified Development Code, Section 3.6.8.g. See the
attached Jefferson County Unified Development Code, Sections 3.6.8 and 3.6.9.
PROJECT PROPOSAL
The project proposal is to construct a single family residence and install a new septic
system. The residence will be located west of the existing single wide mobile home. The
septic system perk holes are currently being tested in three locations but the septic system
will be north, east or south of the proposed building site The proposed building site and
septic locations are well outside the wetland and stream buffers as shown on.the attached
rough drawing. The vegetation in this area is pasture grasses so no significant vegetation
removal will occur. The landowners have planted trees along the stream and wetland to
improve buffer conditions and have stated the desire to continue to improve buffer
conditions with additional plantings. There should be no significant adverse impacts to the
wetland and stream as a result of home construction in the proposed location:
SUMMARY
This --3.5 acre property is located 2943 Beaver Valley Road, Port Ludlow, Jefferson
County, Washington: A Category II wetland was identified in the western edge of the
property. The wetland is part of a large, off-site wetland system associated with a tributary
of Ludlow Creek. This tributary has no known fish use. A 100 foot buffer is required for
Category II wetlands. A Type 5 turning into a Type 4 stream flows across the northern
property line. Type 5 stream requires a 50 foot buffer and a Type 4 stream requires a 100
foot buffer. A single family residence is proposed for the eastern portion of the parcel and
just west of the existing mobile home. The proposed building site is well outside the
wetland and stream buffers. There will be no significant negative impact to the wetland and
stream as a result of construction of the residence in the proposed location.
• •
Storm
November 3, 2004
Page 8
If you have any additional questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at phone
number 360-876-2403. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this service.
Sincerely,
' '''Jt9-1,1-At_AA-Q._, se '11 V4 /14.7.,ea- •
Joanne Bartlett Teresa Lewis
Professional Wetland Scientist Biologist
Attachments
,�` i r ED
sEP 1 1
JEFFERSON EJUN1(.DCD
I .
• •
SITE PHOTOS RE
\' .
Jonathan &Laura Storm
2943 Beaver Valley Rd,Port Ludlow,WA 1'12 d
JEFFERSON COONTY OCO
Photo#1—Looking southeast from near wetland
boundary on north side of property toward the existing
shop and residence.
M1yF.,-
1
b
; I
Photo #2 —Looking south from the north side of the property
with the wetland,dominated by hardhack, to the west(right side
of photo)..
° 1'1 W 0.T tot r
,' \0r1 a \ tII •
\\ \ 7:‘\\t'
` ,
:__ ,'' 1 NN. \\ ,T,‘
p f tl \ \
-may \
`
`__„ I N _ R— \
.1 Ait Ai fat. N, \\\ \
0 - \ , ,a,"kis\ 1:90;3..._4; it ,,
sl
l —
d0 ,r. - Q 3 _APPr0X 10, i
"1 , v -1 N - -- 3d + o
c 1 '`A
t -- p t) r
°Q•i l I Cn A -t- n q A.
70 W I -- - c 9,------„-- - -r-____'
ro s ooly o
— p. O O ftl -, U
■ p ° R
Q o n
r ■ A tA
1` I
_1r
m
CA r I GI
o
+ /� ///}}}111
p d 6 iSf`In - - -
d N_ 50 vs
Q �� .---b
tA ti-1 Li
C _
b
O
NI oo I y
0 t
� �" 5.":" ,--t it 1
• •
IAl- E E E
D 1 c
o z a O
;
A ° rn
-+z 4- *,,L... APpk, F
0h. u1"0/
m
6 e
�
UN
E
E E
2
x A
0
W r
r
o r
�4 n
r11 m
F s v
* 1 a y.
l '^ c o;$ .--.1
'
-t
A
Is
t V I 0
'
i
E ,,, t.
1.^+ L ,.
`
; c f * iP
1
* 10 Er: /
I VIOL J I 1 1 : m
N
I I 17 I ___LILL7 --
11 1, y x / r
'' ,rA U�Y RD
li X ' geAvER
G ENYeR41N-a
�_ "`— '—'te
".— r
FLOT PLAN 2943 BE AVE,c VALLer RD
5R LS STORM. Pr Luo,.ow WA 4536$
PARceLt $21 013 O{O
pr.WIA by JOetel 10441 Lo..um Sforwt
•b ttl2J +o4mun err ns •y�q Y' r •. 4••, v r 1' 'i ...
.a'y 3 r b; SL •'%,,Y '9f1 .2:. 4 " y "'�
lt,
k a �±w
` 1l:. q -jf i }.rr \ '° f 4l .'a.• ,• .164.;.'13�,„M IrFA t > a
,1� Y t i • ,,„ zx<' P sh (NLt- '' ^,A, 'lq t . F #•.
a t�� ppR w q n. �}., .'• �� < t t ,R l"G,
x, 4¢"` 4 " 4 1 sr V• ' E . R> ' r O c 1.zi.,> l'.4-1.. ..' ', ' " J t - 3
.a ' .ir L,L,, 1 .'..if xs k g s r J •43m`'.1 . ( . : q�. S i3>+t,+ oy -tt' r. :# > 1 I. p�. r ,x x b IG•� -0gr ,..
��,Z�,ii t c.;,,. .f' B nl {{.. vlt' 3,i' : % .7.. . ? g •'�„ ^ r '. .
}�g"'.' � 'Yt,4 C g„ - ; 'z •' . t 7. +t§ �i.�°'�i oh s. -:a '$ • _'"v,l 5'� ,
! ,�� 1 I° 3 t 1''F ���� ,-fT�« i'. 4 Y nrr
•[tf .F y n. r ' sp :R', 1 •_x....41;:,.:,;?-7.-.4•-•r....%"r '`'$.}:a 3l t•
f EF lzt Y ,)%� °�.t -�L.: a 14 1. �, a ' ' Ibr- *ipk•.` ....'Y 4 4` S a .
_4 , .. . . y3Ty�y'�1 v v � F �k,v..;.v. '.' •..s- l_4'v ic.
r k'i �! e W Am / cj W )%4', ,>uryxbt yA;• �`. 'S ,S•,
il
yyr. t, r4 ' , '� , .1, - •-,:V
"'-S .�,tomr •
,."t„F S , 4r1 :azn.:44s. 1-- T t 1 :: - ...r.
< t ?t TTT y,, .� pp X4^'3, z k> .. '.:�,.
TRY S1 -lv ,� i i, > Fr:k t .RJ _ l :}:'•..
� 991 'r} � °`j Sr ,�»�.n•,�'M. Y> �r
T ,�y_'+ i,, i,„qi .`q r x,,,a --,.47:-,..),r' 4' +1 *t'6=
k, li (''°�J,- .y, E,F..r`r , 'I{ ';S. S'4 } �> L 'y .. a•aaT V! A ,'^ 4V 5' 'r7i �LL t gypac,. F px,.",.'..-1?,
w t }z 5.
6: -F RT 1 ( Y4C --,N7,zi I s i �� G x r ~ 5 } l :
y > VoN0 pr ra .R.x, w . i '77• `vim i . '':''.
_„
..44-1. 1,r*' ” Eyy.l>y,f`. 4' ) P t . 7,,°t'•.>'45 ° wy} 4';:.: �.1: 4l• , ,
'aj -3% ,'��ylb; _ I> ",n� ;.A-4`,,,,,,'-.1•4A§'A a ..I.S a yid.' ' �r
9 r'. 't' +ks'$v3. 's Z.df : :'tE,4..! ' j' .. > ... -;.• at.
n '-� w x iail i .t 'e^.<yt ,........1...14... .-v'^a .
l z ( '" r .' ■ ',,t L'l j 7 y
s K , ,+4 �,:
SyT R ,,4 >'.. • fl• n'tYrc yet Y l k '1".:•�T.
`V l \ 1 .. -v'1. �t'tr
Y W.Y. R .,/, .. l .7 ' 1.{r-t .: ;tiry, l.,i..•
.:5
' l `r'. Y> .
fi_' Y va i4' N`,r �a 4+ : i e b •
'
f^wbi6,l
`Y- ' �,..�JEFFERSON COUNTY
Mm Mu — = SOIL SURVEY
47fm Wiltermood Associates,Inc.
1015 SW Harper Road
Port Orchard, WA 93367
(360) 876-2403
t.ir'4,- ;;., .,,..q. , N.,,,,,iii-:...A - \-1k, '--;:i1,....i 11111„ 1 .._
-.11, wy.*-..........,.,:?=,,,,,PEM ;.,,.. .rte •,i-. ''.-
ii,
\ "! 0,,,, ,--,6 .../.lit 1 tit
..
. ..
„ , „„: i.: ;,
t
d1
.
i5 ?. 1 Imo/ _ - 1
iii
.� ,
\ J• 459. .47,4:7 r i. 4' r Prei
\ '3C.;:•.
'
n
. ,
lic
�. , . a �i ,g Ii�y i it ik
;H , .. .". .
X4A e4th ' '; .
{ - li
{ \ IIIIIJ
*..` .
NATIONAL WETLANDS
j,= = INVENTORY
`�a:_ ` 1 — Wiltermood Associates,Inc.
` ,1 1015 SW Harper Road' ri` Port Orchard,WA 98367
` .4. (360)876-2403
r •
• •
JEFFERSON COUNTY SOIL SURVEY
DESCRIPTION OF SOIL TYPES
The soils described in this appendix are excerpts, considered applicable to urban
development, taken from the Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of Jefferson County
Area, Washington, August, 1975. For further information, see pages 13-14 of the soil
survey.
CfC Cassolary sandy loam, 0-15% slopes. The Cassolary soil series consists of well-drained
soils on upland terraces that formed in reworked glacial and marine sediments. Native
vegetation is mainly Douglas fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, red alder, bigleaf
maple, rhododendron, salal, huckleberry, and sword fern. Cassolary soils are associated
with Agnew, Alderwood, Clallam, Dick, Everett, Indianola, Kitsap and Tukey soils. The
Cassolary 0-15% slopes are nearly level to rolling on upland terraces where the slopes are
mostly 5 to 10%. Included in this mapping are small areas of Kitsap soil types. This soil is
well drained and the permeability is moderately slow. Runoff is slow to medium and the
hazard of water erosion is slight to moderate. This soil is used mainly for production of
trees and for recreation areas and wildlife habitat. A small acreage is used for permanent
pasture, hay and home garden crops.
StB Swantown gravelly sandy loam, 0-8% slopes. The Swantown series consists of somewhat
poorly drained, gravelly soils that have a very slowly permeable cemented layer at a depth of
18 to 24 inches. This nearly level to gently sloping soil is in lowland seep spots of terraces
along the toeslopes of moderately steep, hilly glacial terraces. This soil is somewhat poorly
drained. Permeability is moderately rapid above the cemented layer and very slow in the
cemented layer. A perched water table is at a depth of 1/2 to 1 foot during the rainy season.
This soil is used mainly for production of trees and for wildlife habitat and recreation areas.
Mu Mukilteo peat. This deep,very poorly drained soil is on long,narrow, backwater
depressions of major river valleys and upland depressional areas. It formed in organic material
mostly of partly decomposed plant remains and is classified as hydric. Included with this soil
in mapping are as much as 10 percent Shalcar soils and about 2 percent Semiahmoo soils, both
are classified as hydric. Permeability of this Mukilteo soil is moderate and the available water
capacity is high. Runoff is ponded during the winter months, and water erosion is not a hazard
or is a slight hazard. This soil is used mainly for migratory waterfowl habitat. In undrained
areas, this soil provides ideal habitat for waterfowl, such as mallard, pintail, and wood ducks.
Seeding of water-tolerant plants helps to improve the habitat for wildlife. This soil is poorly
suited to homesites because of depth to the high water table,pinging, and subsidence. It is
unable to support a load without settling. On-site sewage disposal systems function
improperly or fail because of the high water table and ponding.
r '
. .
' 1.4:14 4 '(''.'- :›-44-. 1'! -T.!!,!' , 1 - ' 4'i l'•4):- !"■!.'")F4---4-4-,_. } - . '' '
57139"[,,.
9 N. - .
, --. -
. 4
-:--...- ,,14.,-,t44,.,_----_-.. _ ! ' 'k''4 -`1"-; 4444,4- —.---,•--<--- .1-'-'7-74`-- ,,,- /4 '4\,_ . . s
T. 2 8 N• 4_``-47". 4/..1-444.4`4',A. 1
-1. -44 .141.'.:14.'::
".1_.'4444
5311 4:7 ,74 1
,.7,---.‘,.,
' . '‘, , t,-rit/t....47.,-:,,,,...>-,7111:,.....:, / 2-:g.V----•\_- ' 1 -•-, -'' -, -: .--- . t
r[.-7.,;-'.,.t'.s:•;--:-.::„i L-'_--\t_,•,'-.7'„-..-.,,,:_-,/,:r;-,-”,-,:--/-i,-=,\/.-.--.)i?i-_,--./.-.''.-.--,.-,-.....--:-----0 t..t,,_.-..-_t
.)\ - -\----;---i 7,,_,--,-1-14',,k,;„.k'i-1/4%..i.i.,.-,..:,.5-:::-_),;k7.„5,2,,-,,,k1-;t,,e-;,,,,,-,.-,.,,.,.7,,,,,4-..-4_,--..,-:„,-.t.z-4-i.-f--?-,:-,1•9)Y,..;;;-,„.9.,,5--,-'.i.,-,Y',,.,,,'',,.,,,?5,if,t,'-,'62..;P,;43„;--,,::ri--,,1---'0''c,r-..,,.N.„..*---7..,,..,,,::kj::v°i..%..,.,,,:-,::..„‘:"•N i,,:.i',:.014--:--.,,-..,a,‘,:.',-.‘t7w.,0,:'•.\,;\,.,,,,,....,..",:„,..'„,1_...c,-.c--.,,.;,-(\...,.-.,:.,,,.; ,,'1i'`,','i,::,-. •-,,,.,!, \'.7'.''..-',-.-..\,t'.1,\'.,\. ,.... :i';',',,,--;,.:,•t ,:,,,, .,5\ •-,\\\-, .
v t
”,,..',,,„..;•-,
."'t
• ' , , , '' .: ''. '', . ) ' ,_ tit` li,. , \
c6 ,' , , , . sprz. i.-,. /(7,:k \ !. , 1 , ) i.
, „.
_ -, - :
1
. : JI,ow i i _ ,, :‘,,,,t,(.14,),,L.:._...._.-.c.:.,.•,,,;,... ,r_,...,........,,,,, .•
5310 ),...,:iff, ‘;..,:•::y (-) ,. ., ,c,
, '''-'':!; i , \ I ./ rf,I.! 4/ ;1;II• ”;
.,..- Li • , l'__ ____ --------ti--- ---4--
. . . .____.-.,*--a
-.- 0 _
, . .
. . .- .
.. .
, . ..
..1
1 4, zit _,,,7,-.„ - i • , .„ .
1 t ;,-- _._) ; . • - ; , , t - - t-,,,--- , ''''`'..-, 382 J.
1 ' • '.I',- - I '. ,-
.... I. : ,.. .. , , , , 1 --; .: 4-•,....,_.
- . k,,,,jt-N.., • .4
:, A ., _.. , Ser- • i • --c., '
f. ' '--
1„,s. ., —I. r '..0 ; 1 .).': ''.--, -.., ,t''' c,<- '
Swansonvi 1!
<-3! .. ., --, --,:-._,-/- ; 1 . ,..7.-- .,--)‘ • --,,k., .
. ,
1 •
b3u9 '''. `-'----.,t ,..-:___-` ...< N., \ , .-7-, - ,- .---., . -f..-„:1--"? i — .-=r= 1,•?'85 N
'- :, ''•""'---'s .7-- ---2.., .' ; (1.) \. * :f; f
',.---//
; --Th. '■\ ' --- ' ' ;.- ' \ 7 ( kt \' 4 0 ' ,-: , . ,
.....„ - 12 1: ) '' \;-: : ' '-' .ti `b-_-" • --':ss t!, N ,g 7'.. .-
,,, ', • it )
'' t '' '''''':'' t• ' ' ' : . . i i it .*• ' 7.'1 ; !
7 .--'''' \ , \'!, , A ' 7
11,1 ''.-'' ';').'" ''' ' '' ' II '''.■° N
.--' - ,-----'
463 -- /
-. - r:,'-', , . • , A .A t\ !I ! -
' - )
-
" -'' ,.. .'8L'..f- , ' -
Z*,
..". ‘• 1■ ‘ ' 7 ' - ".; I _4/Ns, /.• , - - „.' ,-, .c.t.t,
,
,==
. t-..) t. . '"A„, -'1' /i .." i1,,, ,;-, .,•'. i ', _-• - -, ...._ i^?,',.. \
.:i 1•..-I ', .\ 1 1"---... ,t t >,-.; ' 't • - . / ' C '4 t rf • ''. . „ ___,_'',/-
.,.,--• . , i t. . I,
e - 1 4***3s'j, -•kiv ---- li /1 * 1' / T ,--._ j- 1‘÷ • 4 .-- L.'',i i --- '',.,' ■1
_..... , . n ' tli6V " i j ‘ 111 "1" .'
- ' -
1 •
"RI*
. 4
4 . '
--4.`.. -. _„).-' ,.4/,,..---=-'--:' '--4 A • , . r.,:r-.-1/4--,. " i
,' 1-..'• ' .
r., '----_, `.---___.:_•.'a.:1,-I'f•t-,--',:-',-....:._. ''''1, '''''', -', . - , ''' ''.3 `,.itif ' 17-. ' ' R y.d'.7, .,.7.
-- •• "'
I/ ----1, 1- • ' I .•1 43 —'1:7 .1-
,t'-•, - • .- -
'. b..\...,•-• nsf
*\'.--2.' .'-' - '' ' 1 l';'''-',- '',,,,,' -. . ",-,-;,-•'°. _ - - - ,.; ' -
' - --- - *. 1
..-• '5.0 ' -- \- -) \ .n,),;--, I I' I --..
13 ) ts,
- ..
„----•-•--- ---•
5V— - "- -' ' • ' '''-`'-r•-l'1,''''1 e y ''', '...a., ',...4 141. /41(.."1:71../1/j/ L. -: ' •.,'.,re.lt: ..-.4'—'ii,i ,, ' '
— ..- ' ''' '. ,,. ,,• :n.. )• ! - :
4 `.-!'" - 4.4.? t4.5-`44-,N„,„ -444' 4/ •-!' \i• --4,'444444"4"-el",-",e, .---,',- - ,i 17
' - - . , ..',.•••,... ....,,- 7 N.41.t• = '
..--.
•... i LIftwor:,;4*-zre.j,-.;. . i . =,•/ -• , '' I.' ; ) --
•
' . • ' .t4.-% \ ''
,
OC U _OL._14 .0.— :. •-!-t,-,.':`.---., ————7--——--- 1.7"-
,4!
--7- ,- --- I - (;)'-, `cr• -:.\ --,, --' . .-7_," 2 , r.• ...,,, .. t.„,;.„,•-•--\-,•-., -;,,, :,
e • , ! jA, 6 . , ...
; .
-AyLS(25 Top° 1 , r, i.
_ .
,__,-,
i i -.-, , ,I ' ..) .. - --
,
rb--- i.' -reilt.sefl 191 , 5' i,-.. ',1 , _ ... --‘._ . .,1
„1-1 2 . '' ' ' ; ' ' ' " 7 1' .giiik.':1.ii,,-.,-, ', '-- \. t--; , -.. .\,
--,4,-.- --.. . t . i i .,,,,,,,-.. -., ._,
/
I
;> rI I I
I �- m'
I gx > T :I ,ag A8I I gE o 'wj P
I iTlip 1 .-= '.-: tr= '''''
I
L • - H R 4 '
T
I &q.- ,
! H�c
,
n q
t II N a ,N
„ 7} 1
�� O - a I Imo. 1 (�
II Z 2 a
x " 10 �� 'fir iµmi-
I_
WI l r---i_1 III� , • gx r
w �' i {' Er`� I
y7LW.LBI t \ is
F-2s �rvnaa aa� `43 l -I
P. r e � �d OY ���^�F ��� v � I I
o Px 1 I GI ,9'�S,' 8 i g. I
_� 1N I1 1 k: 1 y 1 ' S7 5 • m
n 1w L k t'
x° /�
r vI / I
_______I
I �" V d - 1
ad 1r—, ` IRg 8 I 8 /\ /
11 1 1 �sr e /! !
1 .4 RN O iI c\. � �g /
J
1 �r — � _� b3Ad39
_ _ 4 O- A311YA
..s ' cs) x,F� "gym ' 'Tar sr a imov Ag m v z mrq(61. ° »r �° m2 g g yr °o
gyp � `S�Z>nl� z� �m A
yY,t f/) v o €$ n Ai 1f°- 09-g- (^°"Irm�in�-x� y M Q
b y R ILI "' 'poi g af( .4taR0 N RpO0e A s='"A c4P4R
N R 1 E 1 ON-SITE WASTEWATER PLANS
R s P „ TAX PARCEL 821-073-010 SOILS APPLICATION, INC.
- 1 863 CARLSBORG ROAD, SUITE A.
GLENDON BIOFlLTER SYSTEM FOR SEQUIM, WA 98382
LAURA STORM
i - - _ PH(360)683-6300 FAX(360)683-5652
0 i
Wetlands Rating Field Data Form
Background Information: J
Levu u i . Affiliation: UV I ( }fX 4rt� 0(4 Date:44 1 O Li
Name of Rater: i /
Name of wetland(if known): ,
Government Jurisdiction of wetland: _ :.11l-Tel r,SCE ( C '
Location: 1/4 Section: 0 t■) _of 1/4 S: 5 u) Section: 7 Township:z g Range: l jL
Sources of Information: (Check all sources that apply)
Site.visit: /� USGS Topo Map: NWI map: X Aerial Photo: )c___Soils survey:
Other: Describe: j
When The Field Data form is complete enter Category here: i I
Q.1. High Quality Natural Wetland
Circle Answers
Answer this question if you have adequate information or experience to do so.
If not find someone with the expertise to answer the questions. Then, if the
answer to questions la, lb and lc are all NO,contact the Natural Heritage
program of DNR.
la.Human caused disturbances. -
Is there significant evidence of human-caused changes to topography or
hydrology of the wetland as indicated by any of the following conditions?
Consider only changes that may have taken place in the last 5 decades. The
impacts of changes done earlier have probably been stabilized and the wetland
ecosystem will be close to reaching some new equilibrium that may represent
a high quality wetland.
lat. Upstream watershed> 12% impervious.
Yes: go to Q.2
lag-Wetland is ditched and water flow is not obstructed. Yes:go to Q.2
I a3.Wetland has been graded, filled, logged.
Yes. go to Q.2
a- cw,. t o RI 1 i-e ( Yes o to Q.2
1a4.Water in wetland is controlled by Edikes,weirs, etc. ?or,�
lay.Wetland is grazed. ([e∎S`7JY tr_a�f ry 4 j-j,r, ei 0,7,4 i'u u A d"', r"', l t_ Yes: go to Q.2
1a6.Other indicators of disturbance(list below) SetOi %relit P..44 d ) Yes: go to Q.2
) No:go to lb.
( c i ) r(WI 7.4.ee. as '■ s .•F'_P✓,
--00 0-ZS L - a.e% 0 • - c e a
25
• I
lb Are there populations of non-native plants which are currently present, YES: go to Q.2
cover more than 10% of the wetland, and appear to be invading native No: go to lc.
populations? Briefly describe any non-native plant populations and
Information source(s):
lc. Is there evidence of human-caused disturbances which have visibly YES: go to Q.2
degraded water quality. Evidence of the degradation of water quality NO: Possible Cat. I
include; direct(untreated)runoff from roads or parking lots; presence, contact DNR
or historic evidence, of waste dumps;oily sheens; the smell of organic
chemicals;or lifestock use. Briefly describe:
Q.2. Irreplaceable Ecological Functions:
Does the wetland: (NO to all: go to Q.3)
® have at least 1/4 acre of organic soils deeper than 16 inches YES go to 2a
and the wetland is relatively undisturbed; OR
[Ilf the answer is NO because the wetland is disturbed briefly describe:
Indicators of disturbance may include:
-Wetland has been graded, filled, logged;
- Organic soils on the surface are dried-out for
more than half of the year;
-Wetland receives direct stonnwaler runoff from
urban or agricultural areas];
OR
9 have a forested class greater than 1 acre; Q:56V 0,1e d YES: Go to 2h ,
OR t371F-51 f '
® have characteristics of an estuarine system; YES: Go to 2c
OR
® have eel grass, floating or non-floating kelp beds? YES: Go to 2d
2a. Bogs and Fens
Are any of the three following conditions met for the area of organic soil?
2a.1. Are Sphagnum mosses a common ground cover(>30%) and the
cover of invasive species(see Table 3)is less than 10%?
Is the area of sphagnum mosses and deep organic soils> 1/2 acre? YES: Category I
Is the area of sphagnum mosses and deep organic soils 1/4-1/2 acre? YES: Category H
NO: Go to 2a.3
2a.2. Is there an area of organic soil which has an emergent class with at least
one species from Table 2, and cover of invasive species is< 10% (see Table 3r
Is the area of herbaceous plants and deep organic soils> 1/2 acre? YES: Category I
Is the area of herbaceous plants and deep organic soils 1/4-1/2 acre? YES: Category II
NO: Go to 2a.3
26
• •
213. Is the vegetation a mixture of only herbaceous plants and Sphagnum
mosses with no scrub/shrub or forested classes?
Is the area of herbaceous plants, Sphagnum, and deep organic YES: Category I
soils> 1/2 acre?
is the area of herbaceous plants,Sphagnum, and deep organic 5 Category [[
soils 1/4-1/2 acre?
NO: Go to Q.3.
Q.2b. Mature forested wetland.
2b.1. Does 5096 of the cover of upper forest canopy consist of cvergrCen NO:Go to 2b.2
ate o I
trees older than 80 years or deciduous trees older than 50 years?
Note:The size of trees is often not a measure of age, and size cannot
be used as a surrogate for age(see guidance).
2b.2. Does 50%of the cover of forest canopy consist of evergreen trees older YES: Go 2 3
than 50 years, AND is the structural diversity of the forest high as
characterized by an additional layer of trees 20-49' tall, shrubs 6' - 20',
tall, and a herbaceous groundcover?
YE?'Category 1
2b.3. Does t 25%of the areal cover in the herbaceouslgroundcover or _
the shrub layer consist of invasive/extiUC plant species from the list on p. 19? -4O. Go to Q.'
Q.2c. Estuarine wetlands.
Zcl. Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge,National Park, YES:Category 1 NO: Go to 2c.2
National Estuary Reserve,Natural Area Preserve,State Park,or
Educational,Environmental or Scientific Reserves designated under
WAC 332-30-15l''
YES: Category I
2c.2. Is the wetland>5 acres'
Note: If an area contains patches of salt tolerant vegetation that are
I)less than 6110 feet apart and that are separated by mudflats that go
dry on a Mean Low Tide, or
2) separated by tidal channels that are less than 100 feet wide;
all the vegetated areas are to he considered together in calculating
the wetland area.
YES: Go to 2c.3
or is the wetland 1-5 acres;
YES: Go to 2c.4
or is the wetland< 1 acre?
27
•
•
2c.3. Does the wetland meet at least 3 of the following 4 criteria:.. YES:Category I
NO: Category II
- minimum existing evidence of human related disturbance such as
diking,ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing or the presence of non-
native plant species(see guidance for detinition);
- surface water connection with tidal saltwater or tidal freshwater;
-
- at least 75%of the wetland has a 100' bufter of ungrazed pasture,
open water,shrub or forest;
- has at least 3 of the following features: low marsh; high marsh;tidal
channels; lagoon(s);woody debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland.
2c.4. Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 2c3. (above)?. . YES:Category II
NO: Category III
Q.2d. Eel Grass and Kelp Beds.
2d.1. Are eel grass beds present? YES: Category I
NO: go to 2d.2
2d.2. Are there floating or non-floating kelp bed(s) present with greater than YES:Category I
50%macro algal cover in the month of August or September's NO:Category II
Q.3. Category IV wetlands_
3a. Is the wetland: less than 1 acre=.
hydrologically isolated ,
comprised of one vegetated class that is dominated(> 80% areal cover) YES:Category IV
by one species from Table 3(page 19)or Table 4(page 20) (N( 6o to it
3b. Is the wetland: less than two acres
and,hydrologically isolated,
with one vegetated class,and>90%of areal cover is any combination of YE'3 ate ory IV
species from Table 3 (page 19) NO:go to-3c=2,'
3c. Is the wetland excavated from upland and a pond smaller than 1 acre YES�C? rry IV
without a surface water connection to streams, lakes,rivers,or other NO:go to 4__
wetland, and has< (1.I acre of vegetation.
28
• •
0.4. Significant habitat value. rc
Cile scores that yualify
Answer all questions and enter data requested. Circ palms
4a. Total wetland area
Estimate area, select from choices in the near-right column, and score in the >200 6
40- 2(X)
tar column: .----10-4() 4._
Enter acreage of wetland here: 1 ) acres, and source: ! 5 3
(1.1 - 1 1 .
<0.1 (1
4b. Wetland classes: Circle the wetland classes below that qualify:
Open Water: if the area of open water is> 1/4 acre /
Aquatic Beds: if the area of aquatic beds> 1/4 acre, '7
Emergent: if the area of emergent class is> 1/4 acre, sr 1#of classes Points
0
3
Scrub-Shrub: if the area of scrub-shrub class is> 1/4 acre, ✓ 2 2 3 6
Forested: if area of forested class is> 1/4 acre, v 4 8
8 10
Add the number of wetland classes, above,that qualify,and then
score according to the columns at right.
e-g. If there are 4 classes (aquatic beds,open water, emergent&
scrub-shrub), you would circle 8 points in the far right column.
4c. Plant species diversity.
For each wetland class(at right)that qualifies in calaa #species in glass PoinIS t D
4b above,count the number of ditlerent plant species Aquatic Bed 2 1
you can find that cover more than 5%of the ground.
You do not have to name them. 3 2
> 3 2 3
Score in column at far right:
e.g.If a wetland has an aquatic bed class with 3 species. Emergent 1 0
1 2-3 0
an emergent class with 4 species and a scrub-shrub ---- 1
class with 2 species you would circle 2, 2, and 1 in the
far column.
Note: Any plant species with a cover of>5%
qualifies for points within a class, even those Scrub-Shrub 2 )
that are not of that class.
.,
r -a 2 .._r
>4 3
Forested I (1
3-4
4._ . 3
29
r.
• • .
4d. Structural diversity.
lithe wetland has a forested class, add 1 point if each of the following
classes is present within the forested class and is larger than 1/4 acre:
-trees>50' tall A SSU r+ntw' (YES- I s)
-trees 20'--49'tall Y-#-
-shmbs YES - 1
-herbaceous ground cover YES- 1
Also add t point if there is any"open water"or"aquatic bed"class
immediately next to the forested area(ie. there is no scrub/shrub or
emergent vegetation between them). YES- I
4e. Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between h-5-- ... ,
wetland classes is high,moderate,low or none? If you think the Moderate-..3
amount of interspersion falls in between the diagrams score accordingly Low- 1
(i.e. a moderately high amount of insterspersion would score a 4, None-0
while a moderately low amount would score a 2)
CI)
4'1-.:,,,"`r>•Rkk<:i.>.T "\ 1.m...1):cti.>r Yf+A
none low low
. , .
. •
N..
4.4 R. :•a a
moderate moderate high
I
41. Habitat features.
Answer questions below,circle features that apply, and score to right:
Is there evidence that the open or standing water was caused by beavers YES= 2
Is a heron rookery located within 300'? YES= 1
Are raptor nest/s located within 300'? YES= 1
Are there at least 3 standing dead trees(snags)per acre greater than
10" in diameter at"breast height"(DBH)?. YES= 1
Are there at least 3 downed logs per acre with a diameter
>6" for at least 10' in length? YES= I
Are there areas (vegetated or unvegetated) within the wetland that are
pondcd for at least 4 months out of the year. and the wetland has not
qualified as having an open water class in Question 4b. ? YES=2
30
• •
4g. Connection to streams. (Score one answer only.)
4g_1.Does the wetland provide habitat for fish at any time of the year AND `
does it have a perennial surface water connection to a fish bearing stream. o ss, 1" YES = 6
e4 � t�rtz)c ec
4g.2 Does the wetland provide fish habitat seasonally AND does it have fo Lvd, Io N
a seasonal surface water connection to a fish bearing stream. YES =4
4g.3 Does the wetland function to export organic matter through a surface
water connection at all times of the year to a perennial stream. YES=4_��
4g.4 Does the wetland function to export organic matter through a surface =2
water connection to a stream on a seasonal basis?
4h.Buffers.
Score the existing buffers on a scale of 1-5 based on the following four descriptions.
If the condition of the buffers do not exactly match the description, score either a
point higher or lower depending on whether the buffers are less or more degraded.
Forest,scrub,native grassland or open water buffers are present for Score= 5
more than 100'around 95%of the circumference.
Forest,scrub,native grassland,or open water buffers wider than 100'
for more than 1/2 of the wetland circumference,or a forest,scrub,
grasslands,or open water buffers for more than 50'around 95%of the Score= 3
circumference. .
Forest, scrub,native grassland,or open water buffers wider than 100'
for more than 1/4 of the wetland circumference,or a forest, scrub,native
grassland,or open water buffers wider than 50' for more than 1/2 of the
wetland circumference. Score=7/
No roads,buildings or paved areas within 100' of the wetland for more than
95%of the wetland circumference. Score=2
No roads,buildings or paved areas within 25'of the wetland for more
than 95% of the circumference,or
No roads buildings or paved areas within 50' of the wetland for more than
1/2 of the wetland circumference. Score= 1
Paved areas, industrial areas or residential construction(with less than 50'
between houses) are less than 25 feet from the wetland for more than 95%
of the circumference of the wetland. Score=0
11'
31
• •
4i. Connection to other habitat areas:
Select the description which best matches the site being evaluated.
-Is the wetland connected to,or part of, a riparian corridor at least 100'wide
connecting two or more wetlands;or, is there an upland connection present>100' --�
wide with good forest or shrub cover (>25% cover)connecting it with a
Significant Habitat Area? ` YES=5 i.
- Is the wetland connected to any other Habitat Area with either 1)a forested/shrub
corridor < 100' wide,or 2)a a corridor that is> 100'wide, but has a low vegetative
cover less than 6 feet in height? YES= 3
-Is the wetland connected to,or a part of, a riparian corridor between 50- 100' wide
with scrub/shrub or forest cover connection to other wetlands? YES= 3
- Is the wetland connected to any other Habitat Area with narrow corridor(<100')
of low vegetation(<6'in height)? YES= 1
- Is the wetland and its buffer(if the buffer is less than 50' wide) completely isolated
by development(urban,residential with a density greater than 2/acre,or industrial)? YES=0
Now add the scores circled (for Q.5a - Q.Si above)to get a tot
Is the Total greater than or equal to 22 points? YES=Category H
=Category III
i�
-- (et. eve,
S L(s k,l'bt moo,SOLI
-C-c) s"Y\L'Hl
i jeatitS Cat eSliivittrtd
LL�J�i ntiSZ�ru �C!
32
LA.1 ti. +L's.» LT .
MODIFIED •
ROUTINE ON SITE DETERMINATION METHOD
1? L k)r1113„aDate: U— —U Li
Project/Site: �L� 1 S kt -f County: Je State:
ProjecUSite: ti `12 a f t e 4. c�. Ri: " i .. ` Surveyor:
Applicant/Owner: 7� +• - areas: : +► t
Describe current conditions of wetland and surro ding I areas: r� a �
4
Has the vegetation,soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes No •
If yes,what are modifiers:
SOILS
Mapped Series: u s_. _N0 1 Hydric Inclusion? ��
Hydric soils Horizon Yes Color - Texture Hydric Soil Indicatars Yes No Depth
Dept Honaon Mottle Histosol
Matrix _ Q,,d, ica•,Histic Epipedon
i °� Sa. . o• dh Gleyed
Sulfidic odor
Concretions
Is the hydric soi criterion met? Yes No e r iC r
Rationale: a rn nut. a
HYDROLOGY
5ctubi5hrub Forested
General wetland type or characteristic: Emergent rated
P P —
Permanently flooded Seasonally flooded Temporarily flooded See Satu u tin
Types of water bodies associated with the wetland: River Stream
Pond/Lake Tidal Drainage ditch/channel Other:
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No to water Suf ac test hole epth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes Noy--
Field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation:
y criterion met? Yes Nor l r �e C•
Is the wetland h drolo.y ∎ , .
Rationale: ► •
J t � L •
SUMMARY
Hydric soil present? Yes No___ ____THydmlogy present? Yes No X
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes__ C _No i
Percent of FAC,FACW, and OBL species: 16 e`In OyAi
Is the site a wetland? Yes No \s__ �� -
Rationale: G't ` A ' ' , . i C �'
ve_I v t 0 Ur a:'its 4 -
TEST HOLE #___J .__—OF ___ -
LOCATION OF TEST HOLE____-
Wiltermood Associates, Inc,7>eifIt ■ (lt 1 Gj( tt t _ wev t o{ 1015 SW Harper Road
T # .3 i Port Orchard,WA 98367
SEE REVERSE FOR VEGETATION (360) 876-2403
• •
COMMON WETLAND AND NON-WETLAND VEGETATION
Dominant Tree Species
o/a, to-ver °l.cover
J_Pacific willow Sank lasiandra FACW Sitka spruce Picea sitchensis FAC
Oregon ash Fraximts latifolia FACW Western red cedar MO plicata FAC
Quaking aspen Populus tremuloides FAC+ Cascara Rhamnus purshiana FAC-
Red alder Alnus rubra FAC Bigleaf maple Acer macrophyllum FACU
Black cottonwood Populus balsamifera FAC Western hemlock Tsuga heterophylla FACU
Scouler's willow Salix scouleriana FAC _Douglas fir Pseudatsuga menziesii FACU
Other tree species present:
Dominant Shrub Species
__Hardhack Spiraea dauglasii FACW Scot's broom Cyttrus scoparius FACU
_ Red Osier Dogwood Corpus stalonifera FACW Evergreen huckleberry Vacciniuns ovatum FACU
Black twinberry Lonicera involucrata FAC+ Himalayan blackberry Rubus discolor FACU
Devil's club Oplopanax horridus FAC+ _Sala' Gaultheria shallon FACU
Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis FAC Indian plum Oemtaria cerasiformes FACU
Nootka rose Rosa nutkana FAC Hazelnut Corylus cm-mita FACU
_Vine maple Acer circinatum FAC- Red huckleberry haccinium parvifolium UPL
English ivy Hedera helix FACU _Oregon grape Berberis nervosa UPL
Red elderberry Sambucus racemosa FACU Ocean spray Holodiscus discolor UPL
Snowherry Sympharicarpos albus FACU
Other shrub species present:
Dominant Forb Species
Skunk cabbage Lysichitum americanum OBL Stinging nettle Urtica diocia FAC+
Cattail Typha hat folic OBL —Spring beauty Claytonia sibirica FAC
Water parsley Oenanthe sarmentosa OBL Velvet grass Holcus lanatus FAC
Slough sedge Carer abnupta OBL C)Lady fern Athyrium frlix femina FAC
Small Fruited bulrush Scirpus microcarpus OBL )r Horsetail Equisetum arvense FAC
_Tall manna grass Glyceria elata FACW Youth-on-age Tolmela menziesii FAC
Sawbeak sedge Carex stipata FACW Cal's ear Hypochaeris radicata FACU
Rushes Juncus spp. FACW Trailing blackberry Rubus us-sinus FACU
Soft rush Juncos effusus FACW Bracken fern Pteridium aquilinum FACU
_Creeping buttercup Ranunculus repens FACW Sword fern Polystichum munitum FACU
Reed Canary grass Phalanx arundinacea FACW Bleeding heart Dicentre formosa FACU
Other forb species present 1-a l t VC SL t+G- . i31 tik �-ry't i,itt rti- FA
"C�
5 l5rcl;�.�rd C' i�1-�? acty iS i7t ot�s-ar��11 t
eiC ?t1 c1 pro.--'_h,5is- Ket4-1-v,kyt bIJel04-9 F/4C
l e
Percent of dominant species FAC,FACW,OBL: 1 C`C 7o UPLAND? WETLAND?
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes 'X No WETLAND TYPE: Palustrine Riverine _
Rationale: > _Sv CZ, EAC PrCAj D V31 - Lacustrine Estuarine
I l Forested Scrub/Shrub
Emergent Open Water
Wet Meadow/Pasture
• .DATA Fuxin •
1
. MODIFD
ROUTINE ON SITE DETERMINATION METHOD
,'�.e CI ,S i Date: State:
Field Investigator: County:�_____.-
ProjectlSite: Surveyor:
Apphcant/Owner: AJ J •�
Describe curie t conditions of etland and surrounding areas: ` ' MI" i,ac
Ism . -e• .
�` / n` o, /....:.been significantly disturbed? Yes No Has the vegetation,so Is, and/or h ology �
If yes,what are modifiers:
SOILS
` �� ` - � c�o ,5 �0 PS
G e' l - �
Mapped Series: A to Hydri Inclusion?_n n
Depth soils Horizon Yes Color -Texture Uydric Soil Indicators Yes No Depth
Depth Horizon Mottle Histosol
Matrix `7,Ad I. 'craw, Histic Epipedon
�\ � � ,t Gleyed
_ Sulfidic odor
Concretions
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yeses—No s-
w` r 5 c t a-,
Rationale: f�- o an
HYDROLOGY
Scrub/Shrub X Forested
General wetland type or characteristic: Emergent d Saturated �(
Permanently flooded Seasonally flooded Temporarily flooded Seep/Sated
Types of water bodies associated with the wetland: River Stream —
Pond/Lake Tidal Drainage ditch/channel Other:
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes__No_N Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes NoDepth to water in test hole: —
Fie1d evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion I et? Yes No
Rationale: 50 l S`t ti
` ry• i.d ,s,_ S rs.
SUMMARY
Hydric soil present? Yes X No Hydrology present?resent? Yes_�.___No
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes_ _No
Percent of FAC,FACW, and OBL species:_ /-
Is the site a wetland? Yes- N° t\ A. a Lt�cittittti'�
Rationale: ' r-1-5 t
TEST HOLE #-_-_ __OF_
LOCATION OF TEST HOLE____—
Wiltermood Associates, Inc,
� 1 01- T 4}- 1 — 1 - o, 0-1 / 1015 SW Harper Road
(.WYC:1 c-c Port Orchard,WA 98367
SEE REVERSE FOR VEGETATION (360) 876-2403
• •
COMMON WETLAND AND NON-WETLAND VEGETATION
Dominant Tree Species
cover %.cover
pacific willow Salix lasiandra FACW Sitka spruce Picea sitchensir FAC
Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia FACW Western red cedar MO plicata MC
Quaking aspen Populur lremuloides FAC+ Cascara Rhamnus purshiana FAC-
Bed alder Alnus rubra FAC Bigleaf maple Acer macrophyltwn FACU
Black cottonwood Populus balsamifera MC Western hemlock Tsuga heterophylla FACU
Scouier's willow Salix scculeriana FAC Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii FACU
`.Other tree species present:
Dominant Shrub Species
) Hardhack Spiraea douglasii FACW Scot's broom C tisur scoparius FACU
_ Red Osier Dogwood Corns stolonifera FACW tat t-e Evergreen huckleberry Vaccinium ovarian FACU
_Black twinberry Lonicera involucrata FAC+ Himalayan blackberry Rubus discolor FACU
Devil's club Oplopanax horridus FAC+ Salal Gaultheria sha(lon FACU
Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis FAC Indian plum Oemlaria ceresiformes FACU
Nootka rose Rosa nutkana FAC Hazelnut Corylus cornuta FACU
Vine maple Acer circinatwn FAC- Red huckleberry Vacciniurn parvifolium UPL
English ivy Hedera helix FACU Oregon grape Berberis nervosa UPL
_Red elderberry Sambucus racemosa FACU Ocean spray Holodiscus discolor UPL
Snowbeny Symphoricarpos albus FACU
Other shrub species present:
Dominant Forb Species
_Skunk cabbage Lysichitum americanum OBL Stinging nettle Urtica diocia FAC+
Cattail Typha latifolia OBL _Spring beauty C,layteznia sibirica FAC
Water parsley Oeruanthe sarmentosa OBL Velvet grass Holcur lanatus FAC
Slough sedge Carex obnupta OBL Lady fern Athyriumfrlix femina FAC
Small fruited bulrush Scirpus microcarpus OBL 7 ll Horsetail Equisetum arvense FAC
Tall manna grass Glyceria elates FACW Youth-on-age Tolmeia menziesii FAC
Sawbeak sedge Carex stipata FACW Cat's ear Hypochaeris radicata FACU
Rushes Janus app. FACW Trailing blackberry Rubus ursinus FACU
Soft nrsh Juncus effuses FACW Bracken fern Pteridiurt aquilinum FACU
_Creeping buttercup Ranunculus repens FACW Sword fern Polystichum munitum FACU
trtrce Reed Canary grass Phalaris arundinacea FACW Bleeding heart Dicentra formosa FACU
Other lotLh,sht�ies pr ent: _
/0i ettt{,'!' K f 1/tl,l'Li Go:.)- eat p pi)-�tiu9 i s FP( _
Percent of dominant species FAC,FACW,OBL: 10(!"/o UPLAND? WETLAND?
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes A\. No WETLAND TYPE: Palustrine X Riverine
Rationale: .. , cre -FC74 FALL-) C'13Z Lacustrine Estuarine
Forested Scrub/Shrub K
Emergent Open Water __
Wet MeadowfPasture
DA 1.1-1. rviuri
• MODIFIED •
ROUTINE ON SITE DETERMINATION METHOD
•Field Investigator: v+.P t-r - Aee.,1 / Date: state:
Project/Site: County:Surveyor:
Applicant/Owner: '.---'1"-- Ct G ' L 3c���
Describe current conditions of wetland and su ounding areas: 1t a� . ii c�a •
0 1.A_, - IV . l Lia. '' .
2A � —
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly
disturbed? Yes No 7,.
If yes,what are modifiers:
SOILS
Mapped Series: e, S5I may, Sahl Hy. is Inclusion? no
Depth soils list?: Yes Color Texture Hydric Soil Indicators Yes No Depth
Depth Horizon Mottle Histosol
CI– ' Matrix. San. ci of•pi Histic Epipedon ,
t t Gleyed
y Sulfidic odor
Concretions
Is the hydric oil criterion met? Yes No r
Rationale: • ' • r
t
HYDROLOGY
Forested
General wetland type or characteristic: Emergent Scrub/Shrub Saturated
P P
Permanently flooded Seasonally flooded Temporarily flooded See u ted
Types of water bodies associated with the wetland: River Stream
Pond/Lake Tidal Drainage ditch/ch nnei Other:
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No
to o7N- Surface e water ter depth:.
Is the soil saturated? Yes NvDep—t
Field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation:
No A , F �1 a
Is the wetland hydraog criterion met? Yes • 1
Rationale: ► • C.AC n ti
SUMMARY
Hydric soil present? Yes No_.. _. Hydrology present? Yes No
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes_ _No
Percent of FAC,FACW, and OBL species:
Is the site a wetland? YeS_^- No y ti f2 f_ L�ti
Rationale: *1 //51-1-iL-e. ns' i‘c a. OY
/
TEST HOLE# J OF_.J
3
LOCATION OF TEST TILE----____ Wiltermood Associates, inc.
1015 SW Harper Road
Port Orchard,WA 98367
SEE REVERSE FOR VEGETATION (360) 876-2403
• . .
COMMON WETLAND AND NON-WETLAND VEGETATION
Dominant Tree Species
u/a, :over °l.cover
---pacific willow Salix lasiandra FACW Sitka spruce Piceasitchensis FAC
Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia FACW Western red cedar Thuja plicata FAC
Quaking aspen Popular tremidoides FAC+ Cascara Rhamnus purshiana FAC-
Red alder Alnus rubra FAC Digital'maple Acer macrophyllum FACU
Black cettonwood Populus balsamijeru FAC Western hemlock Tsuga heterophylta FACU
Scouler's willow Salix scouleriana FAC Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii FACU
Other tree species present: -
Dominant Shrub Species
_Hardback Spiraea douglasii FACW Scot's broom Cytisus scoparius FACU
—Red Osier Dogwood Corpus stolonifera FACW Evergreen huckleberry Vaccinium ovatum FACU
_ Black twinberry Lonicera involucrata FAC+ -Himalayan blackberry Rubus discolor FACU
Devil's club Oplopanax horridus FAC+ Salal Gaultheria shallon FACU
Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis FAC Indian plum Oemlaria cerasijormes FACU
_Nootka rose Rosa nutkana FAC Hazelnut Corylus cornuta FACU
Vine maple Acer circinatum FAC- Red huckleberry Vacciniumparvifolium UPL
English ivy Hedera helix FACU Oregon grape Berberis nervosa MIL
Red elderberry Sambucus racemosa FACU Ocean spray Holodiscus discolor UPL
Snowberry Symphoricarpos albus FACU
Other shrub species present: .
Dominant Fort}Species
Skunk cabbage Lysichitum americanum DBL. Stinging nettle Urtica diocia FAC+
Cattail Typha latifolia OBL Spring beauty Claytania sibirica FAC
Water parsley Oenanthe sannentosa OBL Velvet grass Holcus lanatus FAC
Slough sedge Carex obnupta OBL Lady fern Athyrium filix femina FAC
Small fruited bulrush Scirpus micrncarpus OBL Horsetail Equisetum arvense FAC
Tall manna grass Glyceria elata FACW _Youth-on-age Tolmeia menziesii FAC
Sawbeak sedge Carer stipata FACW Cat's ear Hypochaeris radicata FACU
_Rushes Juncus spp. FACW Trailing blackberry Rubus ursinus FACU
Soft rush Juncus effusus FACW Bracken fern Pteridium aquilinum FACU
Creeping buttercup Ranunculus repeal FACW _Sword fern Polystichum munitum FACU
_ Reed Canary grass Phalaris arundinacea FACW Bleeding((heart Dicentraformosa FACU
Other forb species present: �/, to T/tl I FPSL L%e FP St I�ct a.col(1.n[t c -
.40 t'c,ct. e r<< -e-Ai i 5— is f ckti NI rare A=RC —
Percent of dominant species FAC,FACW, OBL: 1 0C°7o UPLAND? X WETLAND?
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion -net? Yes)C No WETLAND TYPE: Palustrine Riverine
Rationale: > 5-0`")Li Ft I(-1 11( t Lacustrine Estuarine
Forested Scrub/Shrub
Emergent Open Water
Wet Meadow/Pasture
. DATA FORM •
MODIFIED
ROUTINE ON SITE DETERMINATION METHOD
C ,. t o S - _ 4 1 Date:
Field investigator: County: State:
Project/Site: Surveyor:
Applicant/Owner: a r-
Descnbe current con•-tions o f,wetland and surrounding areas: ' �.-• - i
} , t �s. -� r - 1. l se• A.;
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes Nox
If yes,what are modifiers:
SOILS
u _ 6un �t 10i 6 - g d Slc, 1,'.s
Mapped Series: S w n Ilydric Inch ion?_ G
Hydric soils list?: Yes No ;c
Depth Horizon Color Texture Hydric$oil In_ _ ___ dictators Yes No Depth
Matrix Mottle Histosol
l C `t 7. -z 3 t QdtuHistic Epipedon
- _ .tr ,;,•, Gleyed
- Sulfidic odor
Concretions
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X N F S�}
Rationale: Lo -' - it- s 1
HYDROLOGY
General wetland type or characteristic: Emergent
Scrub/S hmlo__Z__F orested
Permanently flooded Seasonally flooded Temporarily flooded Saturated
Types of water bodies associated with the wetland: River Stream Seep/Spring>i,
Pond/Lake Tidal Drainage ditch/channel Other:
Is the ground surface inundated? YestN o wSur n t st ter depth:_
Is the soil saturated? Yes._ No_Dep
Field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes_�__._No
Rationale: ,50 '1, ■ 14
SUMMARY
Hydric soil present? Yes >( No Hydrology present? Yes_ 1___No
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes�_No
Percent of FAC, FACW, and OBL species: t e 0°10
Is the site a wetland? Yes No ` ' , ILL +�2„ 1 5.
Rationale: `' •■
I v . a• r'
�j
TEST ROLE #, ____OF b _— _=
LOCATION OF TEST HOLE Wiltermood Associates, Inc.
¢-t∎ o f -■ tt 1015 SW Harper Road
port Orchard,WA 98367 �
SEE REVERSE FOR VEGETATION (360} 876-2403
• •
•
COMMON WETLAND AND NON-WETLAND VEGETATION
Dominant Tree Species
rover %cover
_Pacific willow Sala lasiandra FACW Sitka spruce Picea sitchensis FAC
_Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia FACW Western red cedar Thuja plicata FAC
Quaking aspen Populus tremuloides FAC+ _Cascara Rhamnus purshiana FAC-
_Red alder Alma rubra FAC Bigleaf maple Acer macrophyltum FACU
Black cottonwood Populus balsamifera FAC Western hemlock Tsuga heterophylla FACU
Scoulei s willow Salix scouleriana FAC Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii FACU
Other tree species present:
Dominant Shrub Species
Hardback Spiraea douglasii FACW +Scot's broom Cytisus scoparius FACU
Red Osier Dogwood Corms stolonifera FACW Evergreen huckleberry Vaccinium ovalum FACU
Black twinberry Lonicera involucrata FAC- _Himalayan blackberry Rubus discolor FACU
__Devil's club Optopanax horridus FAC+ Salal Gaultheria shallon FACU
_Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis FAC Indian plum Oemlaria cerasiformes FACU
Nootka rose Rosa nutkana FAC Hazelnut Corylus cornuta FACU
Vine maple Acer circinatum FACRed huckleberry Vaccinium parvifolium UPL
English ivy Hedera helix FACU Oregon grape Berberis nervosa UPL
Red elderberry Sambucus racemosa FACU Ocean spray Holodiscus discolor UPL
Snowberry Symphoricarpos albus FACU
Other shrub species present:
Dominant Fm-b Species
Skunk cabbage Lysichitum americanum OBL _Stinging nettle Urtica diocia FAC+
Cattail Typha lotifolia OBL _Spring beauty Claytonia sibirica FAC
Water parsley Oenanthe sarmentosa OBL i G Velvet grass Holcus lanatus FAC
Slough sedge Carex obnupta OBL _Lady fern Athyrium frlix femina FAC
Small fruited bulrush Scirpus microcarpus OBL O Horsetail Equisetum arvense FAC
Tall manna grass Glyceria data FACW Youth-on-age Tolmeia menziesii FAC
Sawbeak sedge Carex stipata FACW Cat's ear Hypochaeris radicata FACU
Rushes Juncus spp. FACW Trailingbtackberry Rubus ursinus FACU
7 7/Soft rush Juncos effusus FACW _Bracken fern Pteridium aquilinum FACU
_ Creeping buttercup Ranunculus repens FACW Sword fern Polystichum munitum FACU
_ Reed Canary grass Phalaris arundinacea FACW Bleeding heart Dicentra formosa FACU
I
Other forb species present:
Percent of dominant species FAC,FACW,OBL: (0 0 6,0 UPLAND? WETLAND?
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? YesNo WETLAND TYPE: Palustrine 7<-- Riverine
Rationale: > S-,C+ `71n F}Cf =1C v&)1 C(2) L . Lacustrine Estuarine
Forested_ Scrub/Shrrb ,
Emergent _ Open Water
Meadow/Pasture
• DATA r WW1.
MODIFIED •
ROUTINE ON SITE DETERMINATION METHOD
Fieldrnvestigator: scCf Lk_ A 1 Date: State:
County:
Project/Site: Surveyor:
Applicant/Owner: i t �c
De ••••- current conditions of wetland and su ot_nding areas: -A,
S— - 4 ti ' ea.S G - (G rot. a
. C . ".a. . Al A
Has the vegetation, soil , and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes No
If yes,what are modifiers:
SOILS }}
Mapped Series: � o•1 or/ - i 0 , i
Hydric elusion? e. Q
Hydric soils Horizon Yes Colo No Texture Hydric Soil Indicators Yes No Depth
Depth Horizon
Matrix Mottle Histosol
LY (v 10 2 z "' ow- CQ;A Histic Epipedon
Gleyed
Sulfidic odor
Concretions .
Is the hydric soil criterion met? .Ye_ o p I . �� 1 (110 E ( v‘.Rationale: 2 Lr o i t
HYDROLOGY
Forested
General wetland type or characteristic: Emergent Scrub/Shrub Saturated
Permanently flooded Seasonally flooded Temporarily flooded
Types of water bodies associated with the wetland: River S /S rid
Stream ee P P g
Pond/Lake Tidal Drainage ditch/channel Other:
Is the ground surface inundated? YesNoo water Surface test hole depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes____No x Depth
Field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation:
Is the wetland hydrolog criterion met? Yes No• � _ � i ac L
, C A _
Rationale: ■ • a -
SUMMARY
Hydric soil present? Yes No______< Hydrology present? Yes No X
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes No
Percent of FAC, FACW, and OBL species: 106—a7—
y 06—a ^ ��
Is the site a wetland? Yes No C Y e '
Rationale: 1 - 6
. � M0 - "E- r - r fe
TEST HOLE #` , ,OF
LOCATION OF TEST HOLE____._-- Wiltermood Associates, Inc
el tF ' ,C . of S, t a. vi 1015 SW Harper Road
Iii Port Orchard,WA 98367
SEE REVERSE FOR VEGETATION (360) 876-2403
• •
COMMON WETLAND AND NON-WETLAND VEGETATION
Dominant Tree Species
% carver %cover
Pacific willow Salix lasiandra FACW Sitka spruce Picea sitchensis FAC
J,Oregon ash proximo latifolia FACW Western red cedar Thuja plicata FAC
f_Quaking aspen Populus tremuloides FAC+ _Cascara Rhamnus purahiana FAC-
_^Red alder Alnus rubra FAC ____Bigleaf maple Acer macrophyllum FACU
_19_Black cottonwood . Papulus balsamifera FAC Western hemlock Tsuga heterophylla FACU
Scoulees willow Salix scoul riapa FAC Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii FACU
Q LIkka. bj )ANIcO uniz/y s
Other tree species present:
Dominant Shrub Species
_Hardhark Spiraea douglasii FACW _Scot's broom Cytirus scoparius FACU
Red Osier Dogwood Corms stolonifera FACW Everg,i.i.n huckleberry Vaccinium avatum FACU
_Black twinberry Lonicera involucrata FAC+ Himalayan blackberry Rubus discolor FACU
—Devil's club Oplapanax horridus FAC+ Sala! Gaultheria shellac FACU
__Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis FAC Indian plum Oemlaria cerasiformes FACU
Nootka rose Rosa nutkana FAC Hazelnut Cotylus cornuta FACU
Vine maple Acer circinatum FAC- Red huckleberry Vaccinium parvifolium UPL
English ivy Hedere helix FACU Oregon grape Berberis nervosa UPL
_Red elderberry Sambucus racemosa FACU Ocean spray Holodiscus discolor UPL
Snowbexry Symphoricarpos albus FACU
Other shrub species present:
Dominant Forb Species
Skunk cabbage Lysichitum americanum OBL Stinging nettle Urtica diocia FAC+
Cattail Typha latifolia OBL Spring beauty Claytonia sibirica FAC
____Water parsley Oenanthe sarmentosa OBL Velvet grass Holcus!anatus FAC
Slough sedge Carex obnupta OBL Lady fern Athyrium filix femina FAC
Small fruited bulrush Scirpusmicrocarpus OBL ICHorsetail Equisetumarvense FAC
_Tall manna grass Glyceria data FACW _Youth-on-age Tolmeia menziesii FAC
Sawbeak sedge Carex stipata FACW Cat's ear Hypochaeris radicata FACU
Rushes Juncos spp. FACW -Trailing blackberry Rub us ursinus FACU
Soft rush Juncos effusus FACW ___Bracken fern Pteridium aquilinum FACU
_ Creeping buttercup Ranunculus repens FACW _Sword fem Polystichum munitum FACU
-S Reed Canary grass Phalaris arundinacea FACW Bleeding heart Dicentraformosa FACU
_Other lab species present:
Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW,OBL: I Op C7° UPLAND? WETLAND?
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes)( No WETLAND TYPE: Palustrine Riverine
Rationale: Sb 67r7 ACt F i2Q Oa- Lacustrine Estuarine
Forested Scrub/Shrub_
Emergent Open Water
Wet MeadowIPasture
• UA'I A r uxlri •
MODIFIED
ROUTINE ON SITE DETERMINATION METHOD
r �,�e�,4- 41 Date:
Field Investigator: C� �■ County: State:
Project/Site: Surveyor
Applicant/Owner: , areas: i• A.. a v ci • '
Describe current conditions of wetland and surrounding e c_et_ 1a.?i,70,7),
- )Yi - cw•�V� c { 4
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes No X
If yes,what are modifiers:
SOILS
Mapped Series: 5- i4; t oti ti e
Hydric elusion? 0
Depth soils Horizon Yes Color Texture Hvdric Soil Indicators Yes No Depth
Depth Horizon
Matrix Mottle Histosol
i , 0 — oa 0,,k Histic Epipedon
Gleyed
Sulfidic odor
Concretions
Is the hydric soil criterio,n met? Yes . No 'v.&Rationale: _•tee C.l'1,1 -
HYDROLOGY
General wetland type or characteristic: Emergent
___S crub/Shrub —Forested
Permanently flooded Seasonally flooded Temporarily flooded Seep/Sp Saturated
Types of water bodies associated with the wetland: River
Pond/Lake Tidal Drainage ditch/channel Other:
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No_t X Surface
test water depth:SS_! __�
Is the soil saturated? Yes No—Dep t
Field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation:
criterion met? Yes ' No �,
Is the wetland hydrology c Il 1,r_� -e i,
Rationale: c i �r •
SUMMARY
Hydrology present? Yes _No
Hydric soil present? Yes__�No Y
Hydrophytic vegetation present? YesNo
Percent of FAC,FACW, and OBL species: c, \0 o 'fir, r�
Is the site a wetland? YesXNo – 4--y �CWQ rVtl tc��t
Rationale: act i U 2 ;Ai }rn S
TEST HOLE # tt� _OF
LOCATION �_OF TEST HOLE a'p't,._ Wiltermood Associates, Inc.
LO, �} 0 I # 1015 SW Harper Road
Port Orchard,WA 98367
SEE REVERSE FOR VEGETATION (360) 876-2403
• • •
COMMON WETLAND AND NON-WETLAND VEGETATION
Dominant Tree Species
i
rover ''I�h ;, I 40 LSii'1 %cover
/ a
Ipacific willow SuluIasiandra FACW Sitkaspruce Picea sitchensis FAC
_Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia FACW Western red cedar Thuja plicata FAC
. Quaking aspen Populus tremuloides FAC+ Cascara Rhammu purshiana FAC-
Red alder Alnus rubra FAC Bigleaf maple Acer macrophyllum FACU
Black cottonwood Populus balsamifera FAC —Western hemlock Tsuga heterophylla FACU
Scouler's willow Salix sceuleriana FAC Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii FACU
Other tree species present:
��nn Dominant Shrub Species
t�' l-lardhack Splraea dougtasii FACW ,Scot's broom Cytisus scoparius FACU
_Red Osier Dogwood Corms stolanifera FACW Evergreen huckleberry Vaccinium ovatum FACU
Black twinberay Lonicera involucrata FAC+ Himalayan blackberry Rubus discolor FACU
Devil's dub Oplopanax horridus FAC+ Saki Gaultheria shallon FACU
—Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis FAC Indian plum Oemlaria cerasijormes FACU
Nootka rose Rosa nutkana FAC _Hazelnut Corylus cornuta FACU
_Vine maple Acer circinatum FAC- _Red huckleberry Vaccinium parvijolium UPL
English ivy Hedera helix FACU Oregon grape Rerberis nervosa UPL
_Red elderberry Sambucur racemosa FACU _Ocean spray Holodiscus discolor UPL
__ Snowbeny Sympharicarpos albus FACU
__Otter shrub species resent _
•
Dominant Forb Species
Skunk cabbage Lysichitum americanum OBL Stinging nettle Urtica diacia FAC+
Cattail Typha lotifolia OBL _Spring beauty Claytonia sibirica FAC
Water parsley Oenanthe sarmentosa OBL Velvet grass Hokus lanatus FAC
Slough sedge Carex obnupta OBL Lady fern Athyrium filix femina FAC
__._Small fruited bulrush Scirpus microcarpus OBL CC Horsetail Equisetum arvense FAC
Tall manna grass Glyceria elata FACW _Youth-on-age Tolmeta menziesii FAC
Sawbeak sedge Carer stipata FACW _Cat's ear Hypochaeris radicata FACU
Rushes !uncut spp. FACW _Trailing blackberry Rubus ursinus FACU
_Soft rush Juncus effusus FACW Bracken fern Pteridium aquilinum FACU
_ Creeping buttercup Ranunculus repent FACW Sword fern Polystichum munitum FACU
t-/ Reed Canary grass Phalaris arundinacea FACW _Bleeding heart Dicentraformosa FACU
Other forb species present: • _
Percent of dominant species FAC,FACW,OBL: IOL} 0 UPLAND?, WETLAND? X
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes X No WETLAND TYPE: Palustrine - Rivetine
Rationale: �� — 9. C l (�C t t c 1� Lacusirine Estuarine_
Forested Scrub/Shrub )-
Emergent Open Water_
Wet Meadow/Pasture
DATA FORM .
MODIFIED
ROUTINE ON SITE DETERMINATION METHOD
Field Investigator: °�t'e.._ cl( L ) Ytee Date:
County: State:
Project/Site: Surveyor:
Applicant/Owner:
Describe current conditions of wetland and surrounding areas:
Has the vegetation,soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes No 7<
If yes,what are modifiers:
SOILS
/� j, I
Mapped Series: 1.1 !I.) till IQO PC Hydric Inclusion?Hydric soils list?: Yes 7. No
Depth Horizon Color Texture Hydric Soil Indicators Yes No Depth
Matrix Mottle , , 1 Histosol
OH ( co `r'? Z'f S i Hi Grab"" t Histic Epipedon
Gleyed
Sulfidic odor
Concretions
Is the hydric soil criterion met? {Yes S' No
r '
Rationale: Lou) G (i)41A
HYDROLOGY
General wetland type or characteristic: Emergent ScrubIShrub_)(_____Forested_
Permanently flooded Seasonally flooded Temporarily flooded Saturated XC
Types of water bodies associated with the wetland: River Stream Seep/Sprinp.,.X
Pond/Lake Tidal Drainage ditch/channel Other:
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No )(Surface water depth:��� � Sitesy ivt
Is the soil saturated? Yes >6 No Depth to water in test hole: 7 " — !� 1
Field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No - ,Mc 1 t
Rationale: ■ :"� .' a „. LAO
SUMMARY
Hydric soil present? Yes '( No Hydrology present? Yes X No
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes ' No
Percent of FAC, FACW, an OBL species: I C'C` c?c ,
Is the site a wetland? Yes No----� � 1
Rationale: P ci-li ice r∎ Ceerri. ( L i 11 Lt+�-� �dl.Z1N pl.L.n-c-k ine-P9's .
TEST HOLE # OF_ --_ - -
LOCATION OF TEST HOLE Wiltermood Associates,Inc.
(COW e( c prop-e‘17,/ I U ' ire, ”. 1015 SW Harper Road
P' " f` Yl Port Orchard,WA 98367
SEE REVERSE FOR VEGETATION 1 L (360) 876-2403
• • .
•
COMMON WETLAND AND NON-WETLAND VEGETATION
Dominant Tree Species
V., rover %cover
C1re-es 010,, fe6
Pacific willow Salix Iasiandra FACW Sitka spruce I Picea sitchensis FAC
Oregon ash Fraxinus iatifolia FACW 5 Western red cedar Thtya pllcata FAC
Quaking aspen Populus tremaloides FAC+ Cascara Rhamnus purshiana FAC-
_Red alder Alnus rubra FAC Bigleaf maple Acer macrophyllum FACU
Black cottonwood Populus balsamifera FAC Western hemlock Tsuga heterophylla FACU
Scouler's willow Salixscouleriana FAC Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii FACU
Other tree species present:
—
Dominant Shrub Species
Hardhack Spiraea douglasii FACW _Scot's broom Cytisus scoparius FACU
Red Osier Dogwood Comas srolonifera FACW Evergreen huckleberry Vaccinium ovatum FACU
Black twinberry Lonicera involucrata PAC+ Himalayan blackberry Rubus discolor FACU
Devil's club Oplopanax horridus FAC+ Salal Gaultheria shallon FACU
Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis FAC Indian plum Oemlaria ceraslformes FACU
_Nootka rose Rosa nutkana FAC Hazelnut Corylus carnuta FACU
Vine maple Acer circinatum FAC- Red huckleberry Vacciniumparvifolium UPL
English ivy Hedera helix FACU Oregon grape Berberis nervosa UPL
Red elderberry Sambucus racemosa FACU Ocean spray Holodiscus discolor UPL
Snowbeny Symphoricarpos albus FACU
_Other shrub species present:
Dominant Forb Species
Skunk cabbage Lysichitum americanum OBL Stinging nettle Urtica diocia FAC+
Cattail Typha lanfolia OBL _Spring beauty Claytonia sibirica FAC
Water parsley Oenanthe sarmentosa OBL Velvet grass Holcus lanatus FAC
Slough sedge Carex obnupta OBL Lady fern Athyrium filix femina FAC
Small fruited bulrush Scirpus microcarpus OBL , .CHorsetail Equiseturn arvense FAC
Tall manna grass Glyceria elate FACW Youth-on-age Tolmeia menziesii FAC
Sawbeak sedge Cares stipata FACW Cat's ear ffypochaeris radicata FACU
Rushes Juncus spp. FACW Trailing blackberry Rubus ursinus FACU
_Soft rush Juncus effusus FACW Bracken fern Pteridiwn aquilinum FACU
f-tei Creeping buttercup Ranunculus repens FACW Sword fern Polystichum munitum FACU
/∎ Reed Canary grass Phalaris arundinacea FACW Bleeding heart Dicentra formosa FACU
�Other forb species present:
Percent of dominant species FAC,FACW,OBL: i.b 0 °/c UPLAND? WETLAND? X
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yeas X No WETLAND TYPE: Palustrine X Riverine
Nationale: '>- c G 4>e `AC 'FA-C."--' Lacustrine Estuarine
I Forested Scrub/Shrub X_
Emergent Open Water
Wet Meadow/Pasture
• DA.I'A t'u.tcivi •
MODIFIED
ROUTINE ON SITE DETERMINATION METHOD
Field Investigator: S t i C � s'i€e # 1 Date:
County: State:
Project/Site: Surveyor:
Applicant/Owner:
Describe current conditions of wetland and surrounding areas:
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes No y.
If yes,what are modifiers:
SOILS •
C L'1{ 11� Lr ���� o - g'2 c/o
Mapped soils Series: �2 Yes •Lf ti I Hydric Inclusion?_ rk D
Hydric sHo Horizon Yes No X
Depth Horizon Color Texture Hydric Soil Indicators Yes No Depth
Matrix Mottle Histosol
C- L 1U L(i ?_ l aet ivy Histic Epipedon
10- I 6 7/ I San Gleyed
Sulfidic odor
Concretions
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes No
Rationale: 27/_7.,_ C fr"C _So7 0. f;X 0-AA. {10 Me ff S
HYDROLOGY
General wetland type or characteristic: Emergent Scrub/Shrub Forested
Permanently flooded Seasonally flooded Temporarily flooded Seep/Spring a a
Types of water bodies associated with the wetland: River Stream
Pond/Lake Tidal Drainage ditch/channel Other:
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes No 'NI Surface water depth:
Is the soil saturated? Yes Noy Depth to water in test hole:
Field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation:
Is the wetland hydrology criterion met? Yes No X � t 'r� �U �t
Rationale: )o h a t'a 1 C"� !k' ' t'i cc �ti t - Gtit I
SUMMARY
lo
Hydric soil present? Yes NoHy dro gy p resent? Yes No
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes No
Percent of FAC, FACW, and OBL species:, l00%
Is the site a wetland? Yes No
Rationale: Oi Lt/ Orly peS l 4r e_ j vv. i eAlk 11,41
Q
TEST HOLE # '? OF , ___
LOCATION OF TEST HOLE
Wittermood Associates, Inc.
Ect.51 C -r #� - SSA} C�' fvke'r' T 1015 SW Harper Road
L?� ptI'ti a • Port Orchard,WA 98367
SEE REVERSE FOR VEGETATION (360) 876-2403
COMMON WETLAND AND NON-WETLAND VEGETATION
Dominant Tree Species
ohs Lover %cover
pacific willow Salix lasiandra FACW 5 Sitka spruce 471 M Picea sitchensis FAC
Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia FACW 5 Western red cedar,k Ll Ths4a plicata FAC
. -1 Quaking aspen Populus tremuloides FAC+ _Cascara f)i G v Rhanrnus purshiana FAC-
Iced alder Alnus rubra FAC Bigleaf maple Acer macrophyllum FACU
Black cottonwood Populus balsamifera FAC _Western hemlock ' Tsuga heterophylla FACU
Scouler's willow Satz scouleriana FAC S Douglas fir—e)paA.tcts Pseudotsuga menziesii FACU
Other tree species present: e
Dominant Shrub Species
Hardback Spiraea douglasii FACW _Scot's broom Cytisus scoparius FACU
_Red Osier Dogwood Corn=stolonifera FACW Evergreen huckleberry Vaccinium ovatum FACU
Black twinberry Lonicera involucrata PAC+ Himalayan blackberry Rubus discolor FACU
--Devil's club Oplopanax horridus FAC+ _Salal Gaultheria shallon FACU
Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis FAC _Indian plum Oemlaria cerasiformes FACU
Nootka rose Rosa nutkana FAC Hazelnut Corylus cornura FACU
Vine maple Acer circinatum FAC- *Red huckleberry Vaccinium parvifalium UPL
English ivy Ifedera helix FACU _Oregon grape Berberis nervosa UPL
_Red elderberry Sambucus racemasa FACU __Ocean spray Holodiscus discolor UPL
Snowbe ry Symphoricarpos albus FACU
Other shrub species present:
Dominant Forb Species
__Skunk cabbage Lysichitum americanum OBL Stinging nettle Urtica diode FAC+
_Cattail Typha latifolia OBL ^Spring beauty Claytonia sibirica FAC
Water parsley Oenanthe sarmentosa OBL Velvet grass Holcus lanatus FAC
Slough sedge Cares obnupta OBL _Lady fern Athyriumllix femina FAC
Small fruited bulrush Scirpus microcarprcc OBL ,Q cHorsetail Equisetant arvense FAC
Tall manna grass Glyceria elata FACW _Youth-on-age Tolmeia menziesii FAC
Sawbeak sedge Carer stipata FACW _Cat's ear Hypochaeris radicata FACU
_Rushes Juncus spp. FACW Trailing blackberry Rubus ursimu FACU
_Soft rush Juncus efusus FACW Bracken fern Pteridium aquilirrum FACU
:�,tjCrceping buttercup Ranunculus repens FACW _Sword fern Polystichum munitum FACU
`C Reed Canary grass Phalaris arundinacen FACW _Bleeding heart Dicentra formosa FACU
Other forb species resent: LT----
5c 2c ma64''d cliz. e) - U'o Ae.,, ,+G ia , -
Percent of dominant species FAC,FACW,OBL: 100% UPLAND? WETLAND?
Is the hydrophytic vegetation cri enon melt? Yes)( No, WETLAND TYPE: Palustrine Rivenne _
Rationale: > etc F y Ctn) Lacustrine Estuarine_
Forested Scrub/Shrub
Emergent Open Water
Wet Meadow/Pasture