Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Wetland Report 002342039
Wetland Delineation of Parcel 002342039, Section 34, Township 30 North, Range 02 West, W. M., Jefferson County, Washington. David S. Parks M.S. Principal Geologist/Wetland Scientist L.G., L.E.G., L.H.G #533/ PWS#1623 Crescent Environmental PLLC 424 East First Street, Box 429 Port Angeles WA 98362 360-640-3187 Email: crescentenvironmental ail.colii `s Y i� A ; JLF1~ERS0t4 CCCNT',aC® CRESCENT ENVIRONMENTAL Crescent Environmental PLLC April 15, 2020 Lonnie and Lara Plecher Email: LonnieandLara@gmail.com Telephone: (360) 582-7749 Subject: Wetland Delineation of Parcel 002342039, NW1/4 ofNW1/4, Section 34, Township 30 North, Range 2 West, W.M., Jefferson County, Washington. Lonnie and Lara, At your request and consistent with our agreed scope -of -work dated 10/17/2019, I performed a Level TI wetlan delineation arld fun t c nal_.assessnaent for parcel # 002342039 located adjacent to Old School House Road, NW 1/4 of the NW1/4, Section 34, Township 30 North, Range 02 West, Willamette Meridian, Jefferson County, Washington (Figure 1). The subject parcel is bounded on the west by Old School House Road and by Gardiner Beach Road to the north. An abandoned railroad alignment runs diagonally along the eastern property boundary. The parcel is bounded to the south by parcel 002342037. The area of parcel 002342039 is listed as 4.56 acres by the Jefferson County Assessor Office records. The parcel is generally gently sloping 0-5% to the east and is dominated by eme ent ve atian, primarily species used for historic hay production (Figure 2).� Three human -created ponded areas (e.g. ponds) connected by a ditch system exist along the. eastern parcel boundary. These ponds appear to have been created sometime between 1990 and 2005 based on aerial photograph review. I visited the site on July 7, 2019 and again on March 18, 2020, and walked the parcel boundaries and adjacent areas. I excavated shallow soil pits to 16 inches to evaluate soil color, texture, and shallow groundwater characteristics and recorded vegetation communities consistent with methodology published by the Washington Department of Ecology Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Ecology, 1997) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Western Valleys and Mountains Regional Supplement to the Federal Wetland Delineation Manual adopted by Jefferson County. I collected vegetation, soils, and hydrology data in four plots, two plots located within suspected wetland areas and two plots located in apparent upland areas. Plot locations are shown on Figure 14 and Plot Data Forms are included in Appendix A. Additionally, prior to visiting the site I reviewed the following information: 1. Aerial photographs from 1955,1990, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2009, 2011,2013, 2015, 2017 2. National Wetlands Inventory Mapping (NWI, USFWS 2019). 2 Crescent Environmental PLLC 3. NRCS On-line soil survey (MRCS, 2019) 4. Jefferson County Critical Areas On -Line Mapping. 5. Wetland Delineation prepared in 2005 by Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting for the parcel adjacent to the south (002342037). 6. Wetland Determination Letter from Aquatic Environmental Services for parcel 002331035 adjacent to the west of the subject parcel. Aerial photographs (Figures 5-13) indicate the likely presence of two seasonally saturated areas dominated by emergent vegetation on the parcel and three areas of ponded water along the eastern parcel boundary. The National Wetlands Inventory Mapping (not shown) shows no wetland areas on the subject parcel. Jefferson County Critical Areas Mapping shows a wetland area occupying the central portion of the subject parcel. Jefferson County wetland mapping appears to follow ft-NRCSsail mapping polygon for the Belfast§Dkuniva than an actual wetl . Aquatic Environmental ervi s came to�the same conclusion when assessing the adjacent parcel (002331025) in 2003 (Figure 2) The NRCS On -Line Soil Survey indicates the parcel soils are mapped as Belfast silty clay loam, wet variant, a hydric soil, and Clallam gravelly sandy loam (non-hydric) (Figure 3). On -Site Observations The majority of the subject parcel vegetation is dominated by emergent plants consisting primarily of grass and alfalfa species used in the production of hay. Additional emergent wetland species such as Juncus effusus (Common rush) and Ranunculus repens (Creeping buttercup) are found in wetland areas. Both introduced non-native and native scrub species and ornamental tree species are located adjacent to the property boundaries and associated with the pond and ditch drainage system on the eastern margin of the parcel. Due to the historic management of this parcel for hay production, the vegetation community would be considered "disturbed" for the purposes of wetland delineation. The site topography is undulating, consisting of a series of subtle concave swales alternating with convex ridges. Seasonally shallow groundwater was observed within the concave swale areas and is apparent from the darker green color observed in these areas on historic aerial photography. Concave ridge areas displayed upland characteristics and are observed to have dry soil profiles and are dominated by upland vegetation communities as demonstrated by the data collected at Plot locations 1-4 (Appendix A). Crescent Environmental PLLC 3 Plot 1 (South Wetland) Plot 1 is located in the South Wetland (2.04 acres) (Figure 14). The plant community is dominated by emergent vegetation consisting of Creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) Creeping buttercup (Ranunuculus repens) and Soft rush (Juncus effusus). Soils at Plot 1 consisted of Grayish Brown (IOYR 5/2) gravelly silt loam, with Yellow Red (5 YR 5/6) redox masses. The soil profile at Plot 1 was saturated to the surface on March 18, 2020. All three wetland parameters (plants, soils and hydrology) are satisfied at Plot 1. Plot 2 (Upland) Plot 2 is located in the center of the parcel (Figure 14) on a convex surface. Dominant vegetation observed at Plot 2 consisted of Orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata), English plantain (Plantago lanceolata) and Spotted Cats Ear (Hypochaeris radicata). Soils at Plot 2 consisted of Brown (IOYR 4/3) to Pale Brown (IOYR 6/3) gravelly to very gravelly sandy loam. The soil profile at Plot 2 was dry to a depth of 16 inches. No saturation or water table was observed at Plot 2. Site conditions observed at Plot 2 indicate the absence of any wetland parameters. Plot 3 (North Wetland) Plot 3 is located in the North wetland area (0.46 acres). The dominant vegetation observed at Plot 3 consisted of Creeping bentgrass (Agrostris stolonifera), Creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens) and Soft rush (Juncus effusus). Soils at Plot 3 while mapped by the NRCS as Clallam Very Gravelly Sandy loam consisted of Very Dark Greyish Brown (10YR 3/2) Palix silt loam. Surface water approximately 1" deep was observed at Plot 3 on March 18, 2020. All three wetland parameters were satisfied at Plot 3. Crescent Environmental PLLC 4 Plot 4 (Upland) Plot 4 is located on the north side of the parcel on a convex ridge. Dominant vegetation observed at Plot 4 consisted of Orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata), English Plantain (Plantago lanceolata) and Spotted Cats Ear (Hypochaeris radicata). Soils observed at Plot 4 consisted of Dark Yellowish Brown (10YR 5/6) very gravelly sandy loam to a depth of 16". No saturation or elevated water table was observed at Plot 4. Plot 4 meets the technical criteria for an upland site. Due to the agriculturally disturbed nature of the vegetation community, it is my opinion that the plant community in the wetland areas is not representative of the hydric conditions demonstrated in the observed Plot data. If site disturbance from hay production is stopped, native wetland plants are likely to re-establish within the wetland areas. Planting native wetland plant species within the mapped wetland areas will act to accelerate the natural recovery of these heavily impacted wetland sites and will help improve the functional quality of the site. Based on my on -site investigation of plants, soils and hydrology within the parcel boundaries, I delineated two wetland areas on the parcel: a 0.47-acre wetland in the northern portion of the parcel and a 2.04-acre wetland in the southern portion of the parcel. Each of these wetlands are classified as palustrine, emergent, seasonally saturated wetlands, based on the presence of hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and observations of shallow surface inundation and/or saturation of the soil profile in the upper 16 inches (Figure 14). Wetland boundaries were staked and flagged in the field and locations mapped using an Arrow Gold real-time kinematic global positioning system (RTK-GPS) connected to the Washington State Reference Network (WSRN) to access real-time positioning corrections. Wetland boundaries were mapped in two-dimensional (x, y) space using U.S. Feet in the NAD83 datum using the State Plane Washington North projection with an accuracy of approximately +/- 5 cm Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). The wetland boundaries are staked approximately every 50 feet with 4-foot tall surveyor stakes and pink flagging. The associated wetland buffers are staked approximately every 50 feet with 4- foot tall 2" x 2" treated stakes with orange flagging. The upland area which includes a portion of the created pond on the east side of the parcel is 1.37 acres. (Figure 14). Crescent Environmental PLLC 5 Wetland Functional Assessment Wetlands delineated on the parcel were evaluated using the methods published by the Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE, 2015) "Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington". The assessment forms are presented in Appendix B. Based on this functional assessment, the wetlands present on the parcel would be designated as Class IV wetlands based on function. Wetland Classification The seasonally inundated, palustrine, emergent wetlands identified on the parcel are typed as Class 4 wetlands by Jefferson County Code 18.22.300. The landscape classification of the wetlands on the parcel would be Class IV because they are less than 20 acres in size and do not satisfy the criteria for Class I, II, or III criteria. The protection standards for regulated wetlands designated by Jefferson County Code 18.22.330 would be 40 feet for a Class IV wetland for the purposes of single family development. The wetland boundary is marked in the field with four -foot tall wooden survey stakes with pink flagging, and the wetland buffer is marked with survey stakes and orange flagging. Plot locations are marked in the field with un-flagged surveyor stakes labelled with plot numbers. Figure 15 shows the implementation of wetland buffer averaging in order to reduce the buffer width to 20 feet on the north side of the south wetland. Additional buffer area has been added to the east side of the north and south wetlands. Buffer averaging achieves a net increase of wetland buffer area of 0.08 acres. Upland Classification Areas not mapped as wetland in Figure 14 are classified as upland sites. An area approximately 1.37 acres in size in the central portion of the subject parcel is classified as Upland (Figure 14). SUMMARY Remote review of historic aerial photography and wetland reports from adjacent parcels along with on -site investigation of the subject parcel for the purposes of wetland delineation indicates there are two regulatory wetlands within the parcel boundaries. These wetlands by definition in the Jefferson County Critical Areas Code should have a 40-foot buffer designated from the edge of the wetlands. Figure 14 shows the wetland areas with associated 40-foot wetland buffers. 6 Crescent Environmental PLLC It is proposed to reduce the buffer width along the north side of southern wetland to 20 feet through buffer averaging. Additional buffer area is applied to the east sides of the northern and southern wetlands which will achieve a net increase in buffer area by 0.08 acres. On -site investigation determined that the vegetation community, soils and hydrology on the subject parcel do meet the criteria for wetland characteristics published by the Washington Department of Ecology Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Ecology, 1997) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Western Valleys and Mountains Regional Supplement to the Federal Wetland Delineation Manual adopted by Jefferson County. No other wetland areas were observed on the subject parcel other than the areas identified on Figure 14. Limitations This report was prepared for the sole use of client Lonnie and Lara Plecher, and should not be reproduced without their express permission. Maps and figures contained in this report have been prepared for the purposes of displaying wetland areas and associated landscape features and do not purport to represent or portray a legal survey. Users of this report are responsible for independently verifying the location and size of features displayed. This report was prepared using methods and standards generally accepted by the environmental consulting industry. No other warrantees expressed or implied are given. ar�oa►as r�4 ,� David S. f jr c' David S. Parks M.S. Hydrogeologist/Certified Professional Wetland Scientist LG, LEG, LHG #533/ PWS#1623 Crescent Environmental PLLC 424 East First Street, Box 429 Port Angeles WA 98362 Telephone: 360-640-3187 Email: crescentenvironmental 7a gmail.corn Crescent Environmental PLLC References Aquatic Environmental Services, 2003. Wetland Determination Letter for Parcel 002331025. Ecology, 1997. Washington State Wetland Identification and Delineation Manual, Washington Department of Ecology, Publication #96-94. Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting. 2005. Environmental Sensitive Area Study, Lynch Parcel # 002342037. Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS) 2017. Web Soil Survey. USACE, 1987.United States Army Corps of Engineers, Wetland Delineation Manual. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Mississipi. USACE, 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Environmental Laboratory, Vicksburg MS. ERDC/EL TR-10-3. USFWS, 2017. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, On -Line National Wetlands Inventory Mapping, WDOE, 2015. Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington. Publication # 14-060-029. Washington Department of Ecology, Olympia, Washington. Wetland Training Institute (WTI) 2010. Pocket Guide to Hydric Soil Field Indicators. Crescent Environmental PLLC 0 • Subject Parcel Location N A Figure l: Location of Subject Parcel in Northwest Jefferson County, Washington. Crescent Environmental PLLC 9 Figure 2. Wetland Mapping for Parcel 002342039 from Jefferson County ArcGIS Mapping Tool, 10 Crescent Environmental PLLC :v1614,<L[Y r,! fvu ll My NvMvv�.. � MnAv vvan/M'daJ�YY�n_I'.fu•I�Y 1 1r+1I � • Y � ti /tl 'Y.alaA��lA�1 rri�aave��Y .4W t�nv r1111ba1PIr�1ep! IIM. �WM�Y�fA 11�Sr/Wrrr a 1"1rv�ryy�v[I fl/tiy� Iav r.ra rn2l�y. vlvv:j9/(.rr,nr Sat Map —A man Ca11nty Arms WooIInpM Map Unit Legend wp unlit *Moil AOR Mop WW xrn. Apnw wn losm. a to 0 p4manS OW84 Am" In AGI laleaM aT" 91r1 pauit 4llyenv " r wan ! 9 47 0% V{I rlr�ne prrlG CW m provaly imdy loam a %A 41416 to 16 percent ticpaa TUC TUN" provtlyloom, 0to15 0.2 1.9% weent gopai Tulsin lur Al—vt Imeresi M3 10001f Figure 3: Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)Soil Mapping for the Subject Parcel. 11 Crescent Environmental PLLC Subject Parcel UDAR Topography Legend Parcel Contours 10 ft n 300 FAc31 Figure 4: LiDAR Topography of the Subject Parcel with 10-foot contour intervals. 12 Crescent Environmental PLLC Subject Parcel 1955 Orthophotograph A 200 ©Feeh Figure 5: 1955 Georeferenced aerial photograph of the subject property, Crescent Environmental PLLC 13 Subject Parcel 1999 Orthophotograph Legend Parcel N Boa Figure 6: 1990 Orthophotograph of the Subject Parcel, Crescent Environmental PLLC 14 Subject Parcel 2005 Orthophotograph Figure 7:2005 Color Orthophotograph of the Subject Parcel. Crescent Environmental PLLC 15 Subject Parcel 2006 Orthophotograph It LAgend Parcel N A 300 Fi:rl Figure 8: 2006 Color Orthophotograph of the Subject Parcel. 16 Crescent Environmental PLLC Subject Marcel 2999 Orthcphotvgraph f Legend Parcel Boa FrrtN Figure 9: 2009 Color Orthophotograph of the Subject Parcel. 1'7 Crescent Environmental PLLC Subject Parcel 2011 Orthophotograph A aoa FoM Figure 10: 2011 Color Orthophotograph of the Subject Parcel. Crescent Environmental PLLC 18 Subject Parcel 2013 Orthophotograph N A aoa � Few Figure 11: 2013 Color Orthophotograph of the Subject Parcel. Crescent Environmental PLLC 19 Subject Parcel 2015 Orthophotograph aoa �._ Fool Figure 12: 2015 Color Orthophotograph of the Subject Parcel. Crescent Environmental PLLC 20 Subject Parcel 2017 Orthophotograph Figure 13: 2017 Color Orthophotograph of the Subject Parcel. 21 Crescent Environmental PLLC Delineated Wetland Areas with 40-Foot Buffers N A100 0 Feet Figure 14: Field delineated wetland boundaries, associated 40-foot buffers and upland areas on the subject parcel. Numbers within polygons represent their respective areas in units of acres. Crescent Environmental PLLC 22 Delineated Wetland Areas with Buffer Averaging 20-Foot Buffer Reduction=0.155 Acres Buffer Addition=0.232 Acres IN 100 I Feet Figure 15: Field delineated wetland boundaries, associated 20-foot buffer averaging and upland areas on the subject parcel. Numbers within polygons represent their respective areas in units of acres. Crescent Environmental PLLC 23 Appendix A: Plot Data (Plants, Soils, Hydrology) (Note: Plot locations are shown on Figure 14) 24 Crescent Environmental PLLC WNTLANO D[T11111l1YYNATION DATA FORM— Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Reglon Parcel 002342039 Plecher leflerson County 3/ 18/2020 pialacUl911a CilylCounly sampling ti4te; �r11}Ilre ur1 �luC�t 1'C iCr ApplleenUtT.ner �1'rlktir�l Nla f State: WA 3emp1119pbinl: tla+nd S. I :rka M115+16t1 IiiNeslpslarlxY Secban, Township, Ranye:S{'.uwur. 4►•A LandMrm IMlslope, leiraee, etc.l, Hilaupe _ Lecel reberlearoea.e, convex. none) 4;914»0 awe M S Subregion (LRRI Wenrni Munntder urd Valleys �I.{* d ) o�p 'ltz9281i Dnsum „ADR.r 801 Map Unit Name 001tur rdll} diy laanl wV1 Yowl NWI ::y 551fi c e,. R 1'AI I A rills' e11WRIMIlt Ara climake; hydrolope oondillons on the site typical lor this time of Vast? Yes a Na (It no, wMIso In Remarks l Are Vegeletlork_ Sot or Hydrology Miri@cerdly 0sturbed7 Are'Normal Oreumstanoof present? Yes ` Ne Pre Vegelakon ,Soi , cr Wycirdogy natuneby proMenW I0 I If needed, explain any enwers in Ramarss t SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations, tlanu ts, Important hstures, etc. F)draphybc Vegalalsal Present? Yes s No y� Hydric Boa Present? Yes j__ No Is the Sampled Atom Welland Ktoology Present? Yes �_ Na vdthln a wetland? yas � No Remarks VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plw ts. Tree Stratum {Plot site: I 1 2 3 44Cover Geodes —ems Number d Dominant Species That Are OBL. FACW, or FAC I (A) Toter Number d Dvdnent 9pe@ln Across All etrela: 3 181 Total Cover &aotnflrStlrulr rinitLLnn (Plat size. 1, 2. 3. a. 3. = Tdal Cover Nwh S111MM IPlal size 2 m f t, I.1J4jk11gLI-aulgrst fAV-)t1A1,1.UW1u,l4l eµ }' PAC 2. i rrks,nl}[rNL4xrIIII- M.rrIne.Idwrvlvnrl J* FAM 3 &d[ r,nllllu1161144110 l 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10 17 100 = Tool Cent Yfoa�rr bane Slramfn IP1d aka: i 1 2. = Tdol Cover % bare Ground in Wrb Stratum Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC• inn jAMI, Tdel %Cover at. LruIIpIVbV OSL spsclss x t - FACIN species I x 2 • sin FAC species so x 3 = 180 FACU species x 4 - UPL species k 5 = Cemnin Totals: 15fr IA) _ W (pl 11P"lenrc Ir.fnx = RIA - JA t - Rapid Teat rar Myldraplfi* V"Mallon i 2 - Dominarme Teel is s50% e 3 - primlence Index Is 0.0' _ 4 . Ma"alopcal Adsphlflona' (Ruide sluppoxtmq data in Asmarks or an a sapsrale, shesti, 5 - Weaand Non-Vasoular FIMIS' _ Prollemalle hydrapolyiloVepelsllan IF.xpielnI 'indicators al hydra: god end weeand hydrology must be presets, unless tholurbad or problemafre Nydrophygc Vepstallon Pressed? Yea it No US Army Carps d Enpnsers Western Mountems, Vellsys, and Coast— Version 2.0 25 Crescent Environmental PLLC Sall Wrdsrnl PIu1 I Sertiping Pain) Profile Desvinllom lDascrrba to the depth needed to document the IndIc;MF or cantirm the absence at IntSomore.l Depth _ _ M.OkA — RSga&Feltl�Sk latches) foot I. M Vil 1 120m Imayll % Tyae. Lnj Texture Remxks 0-e 10VR9QQ,ItIt 1pl e101vny1111laAM r'lb l0 YIt L3 Gr.Rnl. 60 5 Yk era vAk w tad n1 t GI grrvd?! Hh 3auel %ves nueL t3- Ilon R -R ❑I ti t,ix -;57CMtqS of gooled Send Grans Loc3llork PL- Pots L 010. M( hlaNix Hydrlc Wi htdcotere: IApplloebte to all CRAB, sinless oltlerAase noted. I lindivatars for Problew- Mc Mydric act ; _ Hlslosel (A11 — Sandy RMm Mi _ 2 cm Much tA101 _ Hishc EPIpedon I AZ , Strove Matrix (*l _ Red Penanl Material (72) _ Black Feebo(A31 _ Lamy Mucky Mineral IFi I (saaept MLRA 11 Very Shadow Dark Surface ITF12l _ Hydrogen Sulfide (AAI _ Loamy Gk yed Modrie IP21 _ Other IExplain in Ranaiks) — Depleted Below Dark eurfow (Ail) DeFmelnd Wilk IF31 — Thim Dark Surface IA17) Redox park 9nraae (FP 'Indicators et hydrWhoc vegetation and _ Sanity Musky Mneral (Si) _ DePleled UaIR Surface (FT1 welland hytologyriwatbePresent, _ Sandy Gleyed Matdx (Be) 1! Redok Depreatilena (Fe) unla%dlslurbed at prablemalic ReetrlutivalayerjNpre®erdll -- Two: Glacial Tlll Deplhimuhes): ,ta„ Hydrict3s11Presenti Yes-" No Remarks HYDROLOGY Welland Hydroleglr Indicators: PA. M-.I0(1HAW(J.(E.Ri"lr,IUIY19IS:Pf4r.0A1dtAdsbb Q(IiLRJ�3 8R%0.4dYClIQr:C#i(Y�1ZQt-Olttil7A4111�d1 _ SurrecvVMw(Atl a, Water-Stenso LaNea IN)wicapi v Water -Stained leaves 1891 i1YtLRA 1, 2, High Water TeMs IA2) MI.RA 1, 2, 4A, end 461 4A, and ABI _ Seture5ert (ASl _ Bah cruet (B111 ,g Dr i nage, Pa(lerrra (11101 Witter Mortis ( B1 i, _ Aquatic mvenobrates (0131 _ Dry-Seassp Water Table 4021 Sedinwnt Depaalls fB21 _ Hydrogen SuMe Odor (Cl) Sabrrelian Visible on Aerial knagery (081 x Drift Depatha (03) , Oxidized Rhi:oopheres Wong Lhmlg Reels (C3t L Gaenlarrrhic Position S021 s Algal Mal or Crust l Bs 1 _ Presence of Reduced Iran iCs) s Shallow AMA&td I03) _ kart Deposits t13$1 _ Recent Iron Redaction in Toed Sole 1C41 _ FAC-Naueal Teel I= _ Surtaca Sat Creoles (Be) 8lunled or Stressed Plants tD1) (Lt1R A) Rebad Ant Mound$ (1?fi) (LRR At _ Inundation Monte, on Aerial knagery (071 _ Other 46"n in Remwksl Frocl-Huns tasmnx7cks (07) _ Sparsely Vegetated Conume Surkoe (N) Plssd Obaysallom; Surface Watw FleUM7 Yes i No_ Depth (Inches►: Water Table Present? Yes_ No_ Depth (Inchest- Saturation PreaeM7 Yes i_ No_ Depth (Inches). u- Welland NV"ogy pt"witT Yes >, No (Inrlidescapillary id s) Descrae Recorded Dole I alreem gauge, ira rdoring wall, aerial photos, pwwwus inspedions), it avullable Remarks WadrndPlot llumpleddunelsoasoidtywelcoiwhtions quit profile uusauuroiidWdie crF&-a cawhr)ladiutarsuiwedAndhfdnsbgt Ierrflit. US Miry Caps of EnDntters Crescent Environmental PLLC Western Mountains, Valleys. aced Cast -Version 2 0 26 WFn AND DIITi0RMINATION DATA FORM— Western Mountains, Valleyat and Coast Region Parcel 002342039 Plecher ProJectfte Cr1yJCauniy lefierson County sampling ale: 3/ 1812020 AppllcanUOemer -mme anti .guru MEW mobs: WA U1-64 Sempling Paint IrrvashlialoriO David S. I'arlm1w5rl6U $ecban. Townsh Rea Si_ rp, 9a.�.{;t �1 ��y�gI[i!E ll I_IIILIIf. i{� { LandRmihdlslope, lerrace, do.1: Hiadupe Local roYericormve, conwm. nave) Lo--Vt— Slope M s Subviiian(Mill I WarlamMV1111derwdaraSeyn Lot 4Rn56)d r¢,q Seal+.ed4 DINam KADR3 Sol MapUnll memo 0016wwwollywed}•Wun NWldaselncaelon mll"nranlargrru Ale ofmalla 0 hydrologic cancktlans on the mile Typical for This lime cl yesiO Yea j Na (If no. row In Remarks) Are 5degetaflon _, Sail or Hh*dcpY sipnlesardlyr disturbed? Are'Normal CktwWsmeV present? Yes x No_ Are Vegelealon Sot ar larj*cIcagy nalurary prahlerrrellc7 I If Headed, eeplajYl any ensmvers in Rranaells f SUMMARY OF FINDING&— Attach sitr map showing sarrrpling point locations, transacts, important faelturas, etc. Hydraphybc Vegllpom Present? Yes No—t— fyrdnc Sae Presem7 Yes No ar is Iha $amplotl Area Wellentl Ffydrolopy Presents Yea No x mrlahln a wetland? Yoa No % Remarks VEGETATION — Use sdenilifle names of plants. Tree Stratum {Plat site: I I x 3. 4 5aD1±1[I `�lulzF�rsdlih, (Piail:e , I a 4. s i4cm*Species—almuL I Nurnbeir of Oomlrtent Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) - Taal Cover . Taal Cover "wbalfatum I13101.site 2 m f 1, w Y PAQ1 2. Englbll fda17a111 (I%FlltW-bn,w,butl yy VAC 3,.p,ntr.tsu�er{I{}pl.flwri.lrfhew} 4. 5. 6. 7. 4. 2. 10 11. Inn = Tool Cesar A22j VD 9rralum IFlat size: 1 2. _ Total carer 96 Bare Ground inFbre Stratum Total Numi m of laaNnenf Species Arro" All Safeta: IB) Percent of Dominant Spade a That Are OSL. PA,CW, or FAC• 211 IA)Bl Tdel %Cesar of midm al ir. 09L species x I - FACCIN Spades x 2 PAC Wades 20 x 3 = 40 FACU species x 4 s NII UPL speomem x S = Column Totals: 10 IA) aao (BI Prwalence Irrdeot - 61A- s.e I - Rapid Test for Hydrophylro Vepetarlon _ 2 - Dominance Teat is b.W% _ 3 - Prmlence Index Is d3 6' _ 4 - Mppnalag[al Adeplalroms' o3wode supporting chin rn R�mnrks or axe a sepown sheatF 5 - Weiland Non-Vaaoufar Flenls' _ Pmbemellc Iydrophyeb Vegdaalon' IExplainl indicators 01 hydit sad and Welland hyftWy mile[ be preeeM, untess didushad or problememc Hydrophyllc Veaderflon Pressnl7 Yes Mo a US Arnay Caps of Enpnaers Western Mountains. VNleye. eAd Cast — Version 2.0 2'] Crescent Environmental PLLC SOIL Uplend flat I &rnpl�o Flterrl Profile Description; (Descrba to the depth needed be document the Indicator or confirm Uw absence o atat,) Depth _ flljrinx Redota Faellaaa 1kYchesl _ C%or.In±alLi) C" Imayll ,% Tvma tee TatlWre RrmnrHs 0-11" 10VP408104"1 14i gM+vllysandylaalN le 1B IO Yit e-4 Pa[c kopsrn loll ,± 7o.75s ., JF loam 'Pfie CNCenoardrabon. DNDe Ian. RM-Reduosd Mebbr CBN22verea or C6eh0 Send C"Ing. ' LOW0h PL-P6ta L 91n V . ^Alai lk lfydric 0*1tedFalory IApptWWa to all LRRS. waess alhaw ;P nvtoo,I Indleators for Problemalio HydrFc ld ; _ Mlsload (Al I _, bandy R04M IS61 _ 2 cm Much IA10) — Mlstic Eplpedo t IQ) _,-, Blnpped Melmr I86) _ Red PRmi Material (72) — Black Hlee 1A31 _ Lamy Mucky Mineral IFt l (aee+pl NLRA 11 _ Very SnaloW Dark Surface ITF121 _ Hydiop p gulflde (A41 _ Loamy Guyed Mrdris IP21 _ Other IEkplaia in Rrnadrs) _ Oegaled Below perk Surface (A11) _ OeplelCd Melrnk (F3i Thick Dark Surface {Al2) Radek Dank Sjrhas (F6) 'Indkakars at hydraphyae vageealion and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (81) _ Doptalsd Dark Surface (FTI wn0and hydrology muat be prey enl, r Sandy Glayed bYlrfk (Sk) Radek Depressions (IFS) unlyys 01s1tigbed ax proOltrnWic Ra91tk@W Layw (lfprasiru). '-- -- ---- — — Type: Depth hnclievY WdNe Sal Preeerf? Yes Now Remarlre. HYDROLOGY Wenlond Ny"Icgy rndlcatnrs, PJyt9l(y11 f LlA�fRlu11L41.R1'4_f}141M1t4 G(1f L asleldlM! _ OfG0 0f.V)140tV512-VmwAJcbWIyAI _ Su"lowWater (A1) _ Water-61saneeLasves190)teacepl _ V ter•StointidLeaves(B011MLRA1.2. HIM WillerTaLle IA2) NLRA 1, 2, 4A, and ■B1 4A, and 4B1 Saturolton (Asl _ Bob Crust (at i I _Drelrape Palferns 1910) _ Water Marks t 1111 : Aquatic Inventibroles (013) _ Dry-SLesssn Water Tabta (C2) _ Sedimant Deposits tB21 _ Hydmpan Sullde Odor (Ctl Saturation Visible on Aerial knaprrryr (CO) _ Drift D"ashe 483) _ Owdiasd Rhurosphtees along Llualp Rods (01 _ GeemerQ/rk Peaition 1021 A41MNIOtorClust46e1 _ Presence of Reduced lionlCQ �SlmlowAgairrd(DO) _ ton Dgosits SBi)1 _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tied Salle 1061 _ FAC-Neuaal Taal (051 _ Surface Sad Crean (96) Stunled of Stressed Pl aft JDt) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds 4DO) [LRRAl _ Inundation Vlssble on Aerial anatary (971 _ Other tf:kptai n In Ramsrksl _ Frosl.Metnra Rummscks I07) _ 8Parsely V49etaled Conctne BurfWo (BS) NOW ObeervatloM; aurface Yaaler Present? Yea — No— Oeppi (Inches[: Water Table Resent? Yea_ No_ Oepth (Inched - Saturation Preserp7 Yea v No_ 0eplh (Inches). Welland "pMogy Preurtti Yes Na x @ttaudesre 1 Po W Descrre ecamea Dale Ialream pup, moneerino wen, semi pham, prootis inspediga), it avellaUle Remerkg Upland Pk* i sampled during nimnally Ant mrrdekan. Boil profile vas &T fmn I V to der sudicr. US Army Cape ot Enoinaers Crescent Environmental PLLC Western Mourtlains. Valleys. and Cast— Version 2 0 • WMAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM- Westorn Moulltoinit, Valleys, and Goast Region Parcel 002342039 filecher ]effersan County 3/ 1812020 PInJaClJ911e CIIyrCounly sampling Dwe, APPI lcanulasaler Lonnie una ulunl ecer mebp: WA 1ti•.Il'I'l1'Ira1 Sampling PeMt: D�Ivld 5, Parks,J'WSa16U Invaslgrlorlsf 8ecben- 7armsnlP, Ran9e:531 L+nr7-H 1 ai mua� s_vurr(r. W a Lendtorm (hilslape, tercets, tlells a LeceJ rekerleomrava, convex. none)r'01�+'w _-- awe (96) s Slbreglon (LRRi Wellarn 5,11011nrslnr ued vauve Lai- 40.41%Qt Lim 121.9M.- Datrlm WADR3 Soil Map Lill) Name: adlrar Miry Aly k,snl wal Vvitiml NWI dessmcatlom I dewinu unlrtgwlt Are cllmehc rnyaologlc oondglons or the site lypical la this hnle of year? Yes a Nxe (It nip, erplsin In Remarks I Ave Vepebsllan �, Soil or Hq &&logy significantly dsturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes x No — Are Vepelelion Soi or ItArclogy nalumly problemmlr 7 (If needed, explain my answers In Remark$ 1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach slto mop showing sampling point locations, tmnsects, Important f milts, ate. kydrophyhc Vepnlesk m Preserrl? Yee s Na Nydnc Sot Present? Yea a_, No Is lha Saarnplad Area Welland 14jWdogy present? Yee jL— No wlarin a Welland? Vol ,� No BfMe VEGETATION — Use sclentlflc names of plants. Tree Stratum ?plat site: 1 f 2 3 A I+ s r (Plot Mxe: 1 1 2 3 4, 3 Ab9dute DOmieart Indicator 114 Caner Species? gNWs - Total Cover - Trxel Cover Hnrtylr ¢ruin IPIeL site 2 in ) f to y PAC 2. rrrr}nn%lnrl+r-PP 4P,1enm111114M[WIM� yp FAL:W 3. yal nldrllun.Pit .rShvS y 5. 7. a. 9. 10 11 I cn = Tdal cover iy( 5e , wrn l plot elzar 1 1 = Total Cover % Bare Gra and In Merb 81retum Number d Dominant Species That Are 48L. FACW, or FAC: 1 JA) TOM Number o10ornlnem Species Across All Mrste: ! 181 P ere? nl W. I)-Ati+l ant Sy eaeq TestAre49l FAA!W.orFAS'• Ire) 4ASJ Cancer oT: slulHol a by C18L Species % 1 - FACW species .us x 2 - as FAA species AO % 3 = 180 FACU species % A = upl species % 5 = Column Totals: 100 IA) zao 481 prevalence Index - BVA- L6 Nydrophytle Vagrdaaon 4l0cafan: 3. 1 - Rapld TeSt ra Nydreptlyk VepslaHar y 2 - Dominance Test is 5.5091 3 - F evalence Index Is s3 0' _ 4 . Morphalcpbl Adeplelicna' (pradde supporting dale In Arenmrks or on a sapenta shestl 5 - Welland Nan -Vascular Renls' _ Problemalie Nydiephy]ieVepeletlon' JE%plsinl tndleabors al hydrlc Bad and Y Oor d nydndopy must be preseM, unless disturbed or problemem Nydrophytle VBBetellon Pressed? Yee z No US Army Caps of Engineers Wesiem Mourselma Valleys, and Cast- Version 2 0 29 Crescent Environmental PLLC MOIL ""mid 1'krl3 Sarnping Painl Pronle Dsecrlpaonc (OsecRpe to the depth needed to document the Indicator ar confirm th , absence of ki dca(are.j Depth _ Mal" 13 Fume Inches) Ca« tmael) 1, QO In:arYS 9i g� _ Texture RemorNs D16' 1nVia 71fXV'Diilist tan lilt Gram e: C.Concienlrallon. DrDe Ian RWRedeeed Metrbr_ CBwOarered a Coated Send Greene. 'Locaaom PL■Pore Lnln . 41-Mel4x Hydrfc 1101 tocscat nre: (Applreatie to all LNIts, recess othenMse noted,) indicators low PrnbPemarlt Hydnr. Sales : Hlslaed (Ali _ Sandy Redca IS5t _ 2 cm Muck 1A101 _ Hishc Eplpedon IAZ Skipped Mstnx t$Sj _ Red Paranl Met"." (TF2i _ Stack Hisbx: (A31 _ Loamy Mucky Mineral IF$ I (except 11LRA 1 I Very Snaeow Dark Surrace fTF12l — Hydropoa SrrIBde (A4) _ Loamy Gteyed MMr4 I P21 _ Other I Explain in Ranades) X Deplol Below Dark Burka (At I) Depleted Maltrlk (F3i _ Thlolt Dork SurfacetAtl) _ Redex Dart Surface (Fitt 'ndicaloni of hyd"phytic vegatetionand — Sandy Mucky Minaret (81) — Depicted Dark Surface (FTI walland hydrology muetbe present, r Sandy Gleyed Ael lrlx (Se) Rader Depressions (Fill d[Aucteda praeierntaic .AeaLltofiwlal/erjNprseerrtlt' - — — - - Two: Glnnnl ill) Depth (nnchesT 'lb„ Fydrlc Sol PreaerN7 Yee t No r arlis HYDROLOGY Weitond HYdroli I'xn:�acicat lsl101t�xlalurzsral raaxnm- f ad soaLLq�pelt a.oand iti len�{pa 12w-no isasuri u x SuriieaYrWer(At) Water-Sternei) Loam 1801teecepl — Water-SZemedLeaves (B911MLAA1.2, High Weer Table IA2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A. end A01 eA, and ee) Saturesen (A51 ask Cruet (all 1 jL_ Drainage Pallarr)s (0101 _ Water Marks ( B11 Aquatic Inworicbroles (813) _ DryLsibason Water Tube (02j Sediment Deposits (921 _ Hydrogen Sulede Oder (Cl l _ 8ehiralton Visible on Aarlet kn giery (CO) _ OrtR Deposits 403) 011tdlaed Rhilnaspheaos along Lmaip Roots IC31 j_ (komarphic Position (02) _ Algal Mal or Crust 4B4j Presence Reduced Iron lCl) .1_ Shallow AwAard ID3) — Iran Deposits (B51 _ Racen( bw deduction in Tried Sala (Cfl1 — FAC-Neutral Teal t03) Surface Bye Crooka 1B3) w Stumled of Wassed Rents 1011(LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds JOB) (LR.., _ Inundation Visible on Aariel Imagery (671 _ Other lSxpben in Rarnerkel _ Frost•Haeve l4mmocks 407) Sparsely Vegetaled Comm S urhm (BB) Plow Observations: Surface Watt' Pieseni7 Yee _F'_ Now Depth (Incheel. I WMer Tebbe Present: Yes k No_ Aspth (Inrhosl- W Saturation Prosill Yes _�_ No® Depth (Indtosl. u' Weiland Hydrulagy P'resent-f lase x No I Scram pug*, msnaorino wall._ aerial photos, ptarsous W adrnd Plot't Sampled dudoryl OxsuuJly wee Corullrmnz Surtra W Atar VAIb a ddpth of I'. Sod ProLk nws saurmIod to Ilia surface. ,44un4rl'laitirAsiniulwrWedliv&,& rrFmrnu US Amw Caps ci Fnpnocrs Crescent Environmental PLLC Western Mountelns. Vaelsys. and Cast -Version 2 0 WM AND DETERMINATION DATA FORM— —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Re9kin Parcel 002342039 ('lecher Ftopo1F911e CiylCoanly Jefferson county Sempinq OMe, 18/2020 acne a nc .oturu eeer APplcenUOasler stele: r SmVling Point U db,d 1%.14 1h A I David S. rw4FW5.IQJ Invesbgrlarls) section Tarrssnlp, Renge:5l.i.'F'+ 1N' 1S.a1_ rranxY, {'-0,. ly A Landform(helslops, lerrece, ate.): 11"HluPo _ _, Local febefteomcevs, coavem, none)- r ur►»w awe (%) S S ibrogion (LRR ) Wo914m Slunnrdoe wd V,,gslr, Let 4110722 long: 111:9:415 Datum KA17e3 Sol Map Unit Nome- Umllenrermvllyao*-bun NWlcleseilloellanl`ih)n"n°u"worm Are almelic r hydrologic conditions an the silo lypksl for his time of ywr7 Yes 4 Na (It no. w*om In RomorNs I Are Wootalion _ Sol or Hydrology eipn1loantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Clralmstenaes:' pressnti Yes x No — Am Vogelntion . Soil or Hydrology nolureey problern.11c? Of needed, wagon any answers in Rems4s, f SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site mop showing sempUng point locations, transacts, Important boures, ere. Hydrophybc Vegololion Present? Yoe wo sue, Hydnc Sloe Present? Yee Ne,�— 41he "led Arms Welland Fydldagy Present? Yea � No X within a Welland? Yoe No x Re01erN4 VEGETATION — Use sclentlfta names of plenty. Time Stratum Mid site: I it 1. (Plat site: n t 2. 4. 3 %Cow Sbodes? Slelus I Number of Dominant Species Teat Are 011L FACW, or FAC: 1 {Ay - Taal cover = Talal Cover hILFL. 1I9W IPlal a¢e z m 1 I orchard grrasflJ,r.7,ri.,pHgeirlNl ay Y PA(-,kj 2. f.npinll plunam rl4mrpp,lr,nw„h+u M trot. 3. sP,,l1,-1"I.r 1k")Vu,hwri, i,.V..iu'. Y � 5. e. T. a. 9. 10 11 too = Taal Cover 1'i 04Qy b'na &re7llm (Plot slz(r 1 1 2. Total Corer 4i Baro Giround m Herb Stratum Tatar Number of Oominenl speots Across All S,rata 3 1S) Percent of Dominant Spedas Thk Are OSL. FAC(N, or FAC- 7n (AG) To1sJ %CWr pT., Vu?•Ay by OSL wocies x 1 - FACW spei9as x 2 - FAC spodes 20 x 3 = do FACU speoies 1b x 4 = A211 LIPL spaces x d = Column Idols: 100 IA) 9A0 481 Pr alonc• Index - WA- -o•e _ f - Reold Test for Hydrephyloe Vagelow 2 - Dominance Test is s50% _ 3 - Prevalence index is s3.0' _ 4. htupaoiagcal A-aoplalims [Fiw.de 5uppading daln,n Romnrks or an it sapawm snncrl _ 5 - Welland Non-Vesoular Rents' _ PtMemalla HydrelAyba fteletlorn' IExplainI 'Indbobars of liAwi sot gad wecartia n00c9V must be presaM, unsers dwurhed or problemoft Hydrophytte Vepatellon Praasnt? Yee No_ USAm+y Carps at Engineers Western Mountains. VWIWe, and Cast—Vareloe 2.0 Crescent Environmental PLLC 31 SOIL Purple Dssorlpdon, (Describe le thit depth headed to document the Indicator or conllnm the absence of sou Depth llslrn Red2a Features _ finches Color i11e01a1f cant taco ,� �y�` Laetaxiure dT III YA: I%kN n gravaysdr l,Iim In VIA a-1 PrSr 16mua rpb M V gruvdly,aady L.mi Wyd11e 11011100C41 10; lApplleeible 10 All LRRs, unless olherw/as noted, I Hlslead CAI _ 804 Redm 1951 _ Hislic FplpodonIA2! ., ShippedAlatdx 1.661 ENck 11100031 _ Loamy Mucky Mineral IF1I, (eecepl NLRA 1 I _ Hydrogen Sulfide (Alt, _ Loamy Glayed Mrdit IF21 _ o oplOW4 Below Dark Surlim (A11) w Dep5o" Matrix (F3r r Thkel Dark Surface (Al2) _ RodoK Dark Surface (FO _ $and/ Mucky Mneral 151) _ Depleted dart Surface (F71 Sandy Gayed Metric (94) Redox Depresslons (1711) Type: Depth lindiasl' HYDROLOGY LiPlyrod Plot •1 Stinging F+dn1 tndlnatory Ter Prablemtdor, 1'lydrtn $0111 _ 2 cm Muek tA.10 i _ Red Parent Material (TF21 _ Very Snallow Dark Surface (TF12l _ Other i6xplein in Ramadls) lndtetve of hydrophyec voyeeshon and walland hyMdogy navet be presem, unless, dlslwbad Or problematic Hyddc Hall Pn esarMT Yea Ne _%___ Welland HydrolaW indicators: P1N1>llSlll'.tMl�.ilnM111hY14.9fOPGl�itdfa�t.'4d�'l04.KIi1191d�h'1 _- SsC9!lSldlkf.'1tisBlRr�.li-G(.rllufil7t�VlrDSll _ SurliewWeiler (Ali _,,. 4Vater-BlerregLoarmsIB61,(eseopt _ Water-StainedLeaves. (B6IIMLRAI.2, _ High WderTable IA2} MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4111 4A, end 4HI _ Saturation (A3) _, SON Crust t6111 _Drainage PeNerra I910) _ Water MWIM1811 Aqushc Inwoneblelea (el31 _ Dry-Soeeen Water table (C21 _ Sediment Deposits (621 _ Mydropan Sulfide Odor ICI _ SeWrellon Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg) _ Orht Deposhs 193) Otndlaod Rhlmsphom Nang Lr+sig Races (C31 .a Gaornorprdc Position (021 _ Algal Mel or Crud ( B41 Presented Reduced Iron (C) _ Shallow Aglitard 1 P13) _ eon Deposits 4851 _ R"orit iron fled ichar in TNod Sala 1CBI _ FAC-Neusal Test tD51 _ Surface Sol Cracks tBS1 _ Stunted or Mass" Plants 101) (LNR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds I D51(LRR Al _ Inundation Visible on Aerial kriagery (071 Other (EKpMin in Rarnorkal Frooi•HseMa hammocks 447) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concert Surface Oil) Mold Obsereallonsl SurPoee Water Present? Yes _ No_ Depth (Inohesl. Water Table Present? Yes _ No_ Depth (Inches! Selurellon PreseM7 Yes_ No_ Depth tlnthost- Welland HVIIII ty PrseentT 'Yee No E (Intludes m 1 41 at Describe Reeordedd]eIs Igrown gauge, morieoring well. venal photos, prawns inspedtens), if aweneble, Remarks UpLind Plur l uniptal dmag seasom sly tial eosrdtrioers. Soil profile w.us dry [Mille to the surHce. US Army Caps of EnOnners Western Mounteina. Valleys. and Coast —Marston 2.0 Crescent Environmental PLLC 32 Appendix B: Western Washington Wetland Rating System Forms Crescent Environmental PLLC 33 Wvli.tndriiiinenr,ntifnlrvr P6.1to RATING SUMMARY — Western WashingWn Name of wetland Im 10 II); _ I'leLhcr -_ ___ ____ --Dale of site vistt..31 I Lt0120 Rated by_ 1 MVid S, lo,lrlis 1'W S 167; _ lralRed by Ecology? _ Yes n W pate n(tr3rniR _. -- HGM Class used for rsting_Slope! Wetland has multiple IIGM classes P_y_X_i1 NOTE Form Is not complete without the figures requested f rg111es earl be rombinedf 5oulte Of base aetial Nlurto/101ap __. • . OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY I; Ibaseti on functinnti_ rvf spt-r-oal r-harac-tensfir_s_ I 1. Category of wa0and busied on FUNCTIONS Cata�ory 1- Total score = 23 - 27 Cate pry If - Total score = 20 - 22 Category III - Total score = 16 - ir1 9_ Category IV- Total score = 9 - 15 fUNCn= Inlpf WN I fgtdeoloioll: Pitat lhfbterflua orr.k.Vlant apoNuer'afhjga rte potential H M L H M t H M L andscape Potential H M d H M L H M* Value H M L 11 M t I pt M L fU Al core Based on 2. Category based on SPECRAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland cN�[ CA'f'�flttt Estuarinlr I I I Wetland of Ho Conservation Value 1 �Il 1 Mature Forest i Oki Growth Forest 1 CoastalLageon 1 iI IRterdunml 1 11 Ill IV Nolte of the above Welbutd kigtrty !;yoo n for Werrrr•n WA; J:U I i llpitire Riarimp Furni — F.11eclive Linuiary 1, 20I 5 Crescent Environmental PLLC Score for each functlon based on three ratinjis (older r j rr3tings is not important) 6 = II,M,t b-M,M,M 5 = il,t,L 5 = M, M, t 4 _ M,L,L 3=L,LL 34 Wo In rtr I na rn o i tr r1 twin by r (Naps and figures required to answer questions correctly for Western Washington Oyprpssl_nrlal Wetlanrls MY dit � Tv—�allalw► YrWsn� YI�M Co"rdin ulantoassEs D 1.3, H i,l 4 14 Hydrmp_e<lods D 16._H__,"2 i oca Ltion of audf t jfmt t e oai3d trs mar u ly. nM erIod� __ _ D 1_1. D ,I_S D 2.2- D 5 s Rnunda of area wlthln 150 Rol' die wztland dcon ve added ro anotherlf urel Mar of me tontrlbtlGnp,,.b-a,ln- - ^ ----- - _ D 4,3, D 5 ry I- km Polul n Area tltat extends i km Rom entire wedare ea®e - 'ncludinp H 2.], H 2.2 H 22 ppi IIS for AetesMblp to Ilel aPtt ulydial4rbed 114blrar ,Creeft uotire at map of 3L11'di Itsred waters in base=a ttari ici:oim web Liwi IJ 3 1, 17:i-1 Screen ca Dore of list of TMDLs fbr WH1A m whlcrt unit Is found lfrorn wet:' D 3.a R+vet H1c thletlarHls IM.p eh I To anrwr f wet'llow I ftu" M Coward in Plant r•=uses I H 1 L M 1 a Hydrttpc-iods . 11 1 7 PL.,dpd demehoiom H I i &-ail at ai v Of area wlrhi n I W ft or the "tt r7ud fean Wadded ra ah nrhei lie, arc l If 1-4 Phi. CM&I tar ifnem Ar d nee p k t%ow pl irtte P 1.2. R 4.7 Wlddr of unit vs. Md Ih of it-ealn car be addea to Lwom ew firfufEl A I.: Mar oftee conbfbdfl'n basin q 2. �, R i.i. R 5.2 kill Polildon: Atee Hwextends 1 kno frorrl errnfe w*dens eape- rirludnig pcin,10pris for c9:slole +aaltaf anu undrrturbrrd habitat rl 2. 1, 11 2.1, II Z_] `-nanen wcAGrc or mep of Fafd; latod waters in hac�n tern rctA wrlyuirrl }L1l'P_rl rslUNOft C 1' 11'-r of TMDI:) (cif 'NHIA vi Voliri, unit i; It,urr.316rL—. wj Ybj I n 3 ], A 3.3 lakef►inlie Wetianrls MO oh TArtnmorrtu►erelatre: tlim"11 ruwardln Marti VAAL64. 1. 1, t a,z, ff 1 1, H 1.4 Plant L&JVel of v ens, il� ub., aril her Ira:tsaui pl di anti I 1 Iluunatirr of atvq wlrhln 150 h of TIME w4fland lenn irr added la n"melirr f( urR) 17 J 1 krrt Polvpry Are•d than exrefdb. 1 kin frurn erRlre wrda+xt r•doe- =Ilrhidiiim uOVIoonsfor accessiblehabitat and wrtdfsturbedhat-, t 114.1, 11 7,3, rt : r ',creen caPIt: D of map of 103(dl l utirl waters fr, basin;f,am eculo V Poet bill 1 L T I.1 3,7 Screen caotue of list of TMDLs for WRiA to which unit i- found [from web; L? 3 ,lobe Vyio-ttalodr, Mir talM Te lens►va► urrtlatfs: N Cowwalin Plant Starr_ tl t 1- I I IA H dro iads H 1.2 Plant ravel (if demo t.ea-,• ohrr-bs, ,rrA irsl tinc;r,,an v1ant5 1 ! Plane r~.ivt-i at dense rypd free,,-,hruhr., ind IirrhALC:oLjou ,� rsnt, !cart be added afove! ',4.l &Iiindary 0150It 5uria: 1Lan his added to rmtivr f m; 5 2. L. S a I 1 km Rol'Ipon: Area thatexwnds 1 km from endre watlanc edge - 'nclud ng o, ni fur ru�nslblt: nlYblid[ nrxf IdxJiS [tlf bed IlZiirtat H 2.1, H 1, 2. H 2 3 Screall D l ,a Of of 3tJ'sfd Isted seaters lr basin r um trd ruel>SrDal Screen calx,se of fist of T(MiDLs Ilan WR A in welch unit is 1 I webl S'a.]., 53.2 5 3.3 Wt!thilidk:niney'vrshrIlLsr%Ve-a rliWh lfl11Olnhav R allno F*rm - Flh+etwe latiekry 1. 20 J 5 Crescent Environmental PLLC 35 W'+�Ilalul ua►rn+ �,r ulanrha!r lik%her HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington Fur 4110SUuilx 1.7, the criteria destilhed noun ipply to the entire ututbeing raged, If too hytlry ftc Oi nrtli treed in each 4ue-4don tl,r Mrit apply to the entire snit Wing rated. yule probably have it unit with multiphe MGM lasses, In Hits vtvu, identify Which hydrolnoc criteria io questions 1-7 ripply, and iiii to Que0un 8, 1. Are the• water levels in file entire unit usuall.v controlled by titles except during floods? NO - I,n I1, 2 YFS -the wefla,tod d4sr , I-t; Tidal Fringe - go 1,r 1.1 1 1 Is the saliniti, of the water during periods of ainaual lets flow beltaw 0.5 ppt 1parts per thousandl? NO -Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine) YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe 01ytowwelhold (to ofbe, ( 0.0fre(l41ti'aPreshw(ller'04ard PrtligE,tovfplbejrarnl,+fin- Riverhieweiihirnk liar �5' $tlitivCrCNr TidUl l''rirfNr rr aS'aNi EatuariliP !ve!llalad offal i.l alut Srr,aY'tf. Tlli.+tnerVuKt a_lnnnot i�c� u.st,ef rya (•cureAmr-ii+ur.e jorvardiarinew+a+rlrr lib. 2. The enlire wetland unit is flat.ind pmc1pitatiun is the only sinlrcc j ell water to it. Groundwater ,and Surracc 16vater runott are NOT a, aircv , of water to the• lUaft. NO - vo} to 3 YES - The wetland class is Flats if yotol vwrlol)d refs he rlinvifi"r to A Pars iveH aml, irwt, the Amn Aar Depressfunal veeffilrrd.s. 3. D1)e.ti flu, i ,tlr'c.. wetlat►d tulle meta[ all of Ihr followilig cl It1.r•la' Tile vegetated hart id the wetland is on the sKores of a badv of pernilancmt open waster (vAthout ink, plaltitti ofl Ihr surfiice at any liniv oftlic yvarj al le!as1 20 it (R 11a l in firs; --At liratsl 399+. c+f'thc open Wutt'r area is deept°r Ilidn 6.6 It f 2 m j NO Atr to 4 YES - The wetland eliys is Lake Fringe (Liewmine Fringe) 4. DMIN' the Attire• W441JFIII unit meet all rf the following criteria" The wetland is on d slope islo a .roll be veavyrnduail, _Tile water flipArs thniiigh the %vetlund In one direction (untdirt criondiI and usually ro)ivcs h•,rrri scup% 11 may flow tiuhtirirl;ucc, as 4tectnow, irr In a -,WWIu withruil dislinrl hanky, The water le w s the wetland wMout being impounded NO - go tier, VES - Tfu' wMaand dwoq ly Slope NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these typc of wetland( except orcasionally in versa small and shallow tieprt'sSlollti 101 behind iiurllm,n9es (Jelu'r`,slI Illy arc' IlSualI4' r3 It diamele'r grid liSti tha11 t it dt'+'nl. 5. Does the entire wetfaiad uult meet all r+t the raliln% in f+cr►tenaz _Tht, mot is, I11 a %jaileV, ur srriLllrn I-haulu!l, w11r!I-0 it gtL[S illtllltlitied Ily overhank Iloodlnµ [I-Iarr1 11141 Stream or river, __The „vcrbanktluoding occurs at lcust+lnce ev'er►' 2 vecinl. t0V@r1-104111411411! Sy-av'ni Im W4,lue+r1 WA ,41t 1 ►IIRIA+r rLuaw Farn, - l'I(r,11v� larivan 120 B Crescent Environmental PLLC 36 Wetland name or number .—. NO - go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Rlverine NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at same time during the year? pals means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the Interior of the wetland, NO - go to 7 YES - The wetland class is Depressional Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a Few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may he ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. NO - go to B YES - The wetland class is Depresaional Your wetland unit seems to he difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade Into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a tone of flooding along its sides. GO BACKAND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1.7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS TN THE UNIT (make a rouglt sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identily the appropriate class to use for the rating system Ifyou have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. NOTE; Use this table only if the class that Is recommended In the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. if the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 Is less than 10% of the unit, classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 9GIN, of the total area. HGM dgsses within the wetland unit be Ing rated HGM dins to use in rating Slope + Riverine Riverin e Slope + Depresslonal De resslonal Slope + Lake Fringe Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary of depression Depressional Depressional + Lake Fringe De sessional Riverine+ Lake Fringe Riverine Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland Treat as ESTUARINE 1 f you are. still unable to determMe which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or ifyou ha ve nmre than 211GN classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Uepressional for the rathip. Wetlaud I%r IM System for Western WA; 2014 Update Rattrgt Form — E ft<ective lanmy 1, 24115 Crescent Environmental PLLC 37 W 01wid ii dine, a it itiumher— DEPRMIOML AND FLP13 WETLANDS Water Quality Furtttlarts 111tilt nlr?tI IIra1 tIte sllr rutecIOU Ikh to WNTPOlfJt?wow owfo" D LQ- Does the site hove die potentlal to Improve water quality? U 1 : r:U ariE(i 1 II&Lt VAMI aufflam froul 1.14 -ti (1d: Wevana Is a dap1esslon of tl5t 4wprasslon Ir]l1 E;r104 7 rn bey) with *+a =uriar_e wain+ fea91 ng It I,ro oll;Iet) pewo s = 3 Wer,and has 7n Ir.tnrmlttenvy Ilowlne, steam cr ditch, OR I,i%mIV tanstdctetd oernw:inently rlowrng aitlet pri nts - 2 Wetland has dr urr_oli-rr tea. LY =IIglerly c2n*-toclaa, s�.tl tace uuo&j that Iz pernia*leynvy floWuyl aclnts = i Wrdand is a f -, depressiori (QUESiiON 7 on lae ,, wn rye outlet Is a Eon-afier'Lly McWng ditt h ern-- 1 0 1.d. stie UZI r 4 fxbelow l I Is true clay ❑e trve organic (use AM LS JefinftfonS) ?'es - A Ne = II D 1.3, try rb f]>r1iCsAnd df•ttfbydyr riff nmsishrnt ulnn[e If ms grni, rLn,o slliid+, yndlry F, rirlieu �r wwry{in r lnWA,f Werand has persistert, urrgrazed, plant 951Jror aree aclnts = 5 Wt'linti" has rreivstvri, iirjnjzr�d, pinnu -' Lr i-d ,-•r,-a 7airtt. 3 Weteand has aersistent, unprazeti peants 3. ,+; -it arf:z Welland has pe rd Hent, urdr weed.narlG •: F, of arva pOrlts= n D 1.41 r r f fhti is rb6 arep topr is pofirfed_ oo at teair�1 e: onrlk5. SEe Ae sc., e0t16Yr in n)13 .Ama m-isonaliv pendec is >'fl natal area or wetland pc; n _ 4 IAte�a selasc rwhy pondeu is i la tnLAI ales Of weR3111.1 Lkvinu = 1 Arnq sowwrml,v ponded Ii r W Intill Afr'r of Wrnglnd ntin!a = n total for 01 Add It,=- ROlrlu -ri tie Domes -wcge Ratleigof Site PotenRtal If score Is,_1z-16 = N 641= M _l1� = L (feoccrd Mee rrrtirg an the fvsr opge D 2A Does the landscape havt the potential to support the water quality function at the site? P 7 t nr t. the Wnllarid limit renriur .Iwrtivwliter rII+c1,p1on r Y- = I No= n J71 7, la + t1%i'.t IP* aie.a within 150 ft Gf kIlr Welliirj 'rl Isrnii usms kiln It generate pullulalII,? 14` = i Nr = rl P 1. 3. Amp Iherr,; trntir: nyllo.,mN WJrhih i!R it nl top wctlann'f Yet - 1 A : 0 D 2 4. Are there athrr sources of pollutants coming, into tie trledane thac are oat listed In puesvor-s 0 2.1-0 2 37 SaL,ru Yx = 1 Nn = n lotal for fl T Add rhr points,e, ttia eases above Rating of LaodMape Potarltlal If style 6;_3 air b - H _l or 2 : M _0 = L Ike Ndl the ratir-g cn th a nrsr canna D 3.0 Is the water o4mality Improvement pmpde4 bV the +lee Vall®ble to Sade a D 3.--. Does the wevand discharge directly ri.e.. winin 1 mI) o-a a stream •aver. late or mannE water that is on the 30 ie'tIII!,1? Ve=s=l Ni; =n D 3.2. Is die wetland In a basin or sl,b-barn .%here an acuauc resource <s an the 303(d) AW Yes- 1 Ni:— 0 +4) 3.3. Has the s, to veen dentlf ea rn a Lvatershed or local olar es Important for mafnralning wares quality {answee YES If Vlrvr is a Pi6 W )ear the busk. Ih iWIK_h rile, a/na is found)/ Yr . = 7 No= 0 ICAW fLr P 3 Add kPM POl -Itt II II1L �p.Ift dbLYK Rating of Value It score is: 24 a H !1-z M �0: L lrerWd the rofing vri the firaI pug& WOL-vo tl li;ttirl)t Sv!,turn Iris WrNle-l11 WA ,alit 1 lllt<1;3I, iiautw Furrn - 1:1101,11vr lonuan 1 21411 Crescent Environmental PLLC 38 Wellellid Iwrllu Ill` turns I wr DEPRESSIONAL.AND FLATS WETLANDS HydroW& Furl[rians indir.atam dui the site hinviollm to rrdute t1noding and srreanf degradinloril D 4.0, Dove the site have the potential to reduce OW(IlitV and erasion? lT i, I r:'rt • ICsrr'1i1!�::C h.3 L"L'.�Ia11�:3ivJ_ m tl-� wo k Ianr{' Wettana Is a depression or flatoepresslon Wrtn no su'fare witter leaVingitlnin sutlev MoL I M-Tisrld I-aa ar+ ime?rnHttoiriy flawlr4g streer+4 rr dltut, OH highly consttfe:led perirranetilly tlawriig eutldtpctlnL. = 2 iAroriand Is a fla: dep-osslon (QuE Mf),N7 car K*O, whose outlet is a permanently ;lowing dltcjt mints Wetland has ar• urKonsiric-Ted, tr MijEtiv cower crea, ail fact uuuel that Is perrLsntelY flowlr Il3[1 = rJ D 4-2. _t] prfl of!.Wr j, a If urlrur. w�ar.crjL, Fsfft ie the ?I-^ hf nfp6ridony abovtr the L+ormm or atria urtffP.f. Poe werfdnds 'MM no cuti+-r. mcocure from the s+jrdrrtr of perMMV. nt lualeY or if-lry_ VIC sfreoe MI't, h.31`11:1 of purldirlg rare a {T Cr rrlctre auoVe !ne surface c: htlttam of vueler po ors = d Marks of pondingbctwQern 2 fl to : 2 Ft ilom sur+ars it bnttom of -uc4t r: Vanes ara at east 0.5 ft w 4 j ft rfom i-irrace or ioti orn r,e t3uTle T ;.tcl rats = S Tfw wrt:and is "hoadvalAri wellanry ^mints- z Alerlano Is Pat but Itas _mall depresslorlsmr. EN surface that ltrap water paints= 1 Marks CI poridirip Ins Ilrar.0.4 it 6 ifiP ikr.ntA _ 0 Lt d a. rf - E5rjrnar4 rhrr rorfp of frVr tlrr, 0 pf AIPWi mm t,%vjn eontribtfieig surface water ie sole w'r:oond to rht area of the eoetrano' unlg efself. Tirt1 rarer• of +hr haltAi it let" lhrn TIT limnt tee wee of the aarril point* = S The area of The lsasir Is lit to JUL' tlmas. [the area of the unit saints - 3 Thr-item of tlirl t>J1^h rrlort lit4n JED rime; the yre.) rat thr unit pnintp = n Entlrc- wetland Is In die f tars class pal nts = 5 laral for Loa Arid ML Of$0%1h Tile exult: dyoed Rating 151 Slew flfrtanelrl E-31= M 4! = L Hee;rrd the rarfrg nre mefirst Page D 5d1, Does the landscape Niue theimtential to suppoil It talc L. lunr tiaras of OW suer? 5.1. DooF the wvtiand rvcritK storrnwrilmr ditclraryr57 Ysa. = 1 Nt)= 11 D 5.'c, Is 113%ol the area within 150 It of the wcrlard inland uses that apont rair ®sows rUnaK" Yea - i Nr, - 0 la ti.9, Is h,rtre rtw+l A L tit rise t:ruirrlbumily Wirh ni the wer1er d ruvelad Willi hnentA" hurnan Wild uaea ojiexldrhtlai at -1 resldenceeac, urnan onmrn roal alpricuiture. atc.0 ti•'es - 1 No - 0 Total for D 5 Add the points in the omms wove Rating a1 landata'e f�phrttjal If.! war 5:i; s M _11 or 2: Tyr _47 = t Re+^r rtr rnr rtrfer q oar ihr fTrsr pnap D fiff Are the hyLLr o c funtrdons provided Wiff the site Yilwablil to watt ? 17 6.1. Tl�r�ut in a I�ii s_ u�r H-at_Is�flvudlnerrrtlamo• Chansr rnr� deirri�rlcrr fhni la�f rraulthF. cvndlrinns nr;almq rre wetand fire vt being rored, Donor add points. QUasLtrhe Mahestscarr�4MgMjto gne undithart is me File werinnd rapture; xurfnr,- rYtlUtr r}+nl ,could utiterwisr Rfhw daurrgtrrlinnf inr»areas tiyllnle. floodilrg hob damaged human or natural resources to g, houses or salmon reddsl: • Haodingocctuisinasuh-oasnthat Istrhmedlatelieaowrgrad+encofuret pal nl:�,=2 • SUTface flooding problems are rn a aub-b-ns ri tanner acwq-giadlent. points - 1 rli. xGtlg frutrl IUcxl'rswg9at 's nrt kSatle In Ihe.444-liaoln, PL nrs = t The existing ar potential outflow from the wetland is co con;!ralraea t v humar or ral ural conditions Thai d*t YdaW &iiy&fl bi, rrsC wdilwid cancan Irrarlt chat Herod Vrnrrrie+-,Volk Sx:IntR = 0 There are ro problems kwth fl-jodlr,Toownrtma+n of tro- wedara pomis • 0 D n 2. Has The sfte been vlerdit-j as Importan? for fload storage or Foot tontragartr �n a reglonal llcarr cantrol plan' Yes=2 No=d Iora,l fix is b Add the palms to the Duxes atime "Nike ofValue ifsculeM_24=H _l=M G=1 Walt,mlNalinittiv,trrnlJwWvrt«tuWA, a61Tlellxi,ty R.uNur Ferran - lafr, ilroe tmouary 1 24115 Owrim, the roriv oar role f rrsr na{ee, Crescent Environmental PLLC 39 WHIwid 11atuo III- P1umIier RiVElRINE AND FRESHWATER TIDAL FRINGE WMANDS Watttr Quality Funniorts - I Mmft'i thNt.l ejN*#Wkitf &At@ [IvtltiatPr WerwipimaU1lIf R 1.0, Does the site hom the potential to improve water quality � R l 1 Arua rst rurfactm dent"n,sions within rhr Ri"rinia wrrti.iro ihnr,arl lrara sndimentsduring a PlciorJinp;rvrrit- CeQressrons ;over -m ,`, area ut,wtl3nd mints - 9 Uepsle-4iorin CIA'cr y ,b a,e.t Iuf spaflpria {.wink-, = 4 N-Dressions. pre%nt but cover c 1•, area of wetland Dints - 2 NL ,x rss•ans P1user: oalnrs = U r! 1 l `irrurtLi m r:f tilar,Is.n flip KrllaA'r>f iarras wirh >913% rewcl al pnriun hnlKlli, Mat Cp warden clms•.nel Trees o. s1-vub3 - `j area df the wetland LOlr.rs = $ IIi2 air irr'Li {7s 'a 'tam! cl tr,t -Nei lsro 114r16T.!. ='J' He rbacecus plants (' is In h phY : I 31 ee of trl_ 'dietlard wont- G Itlrrtlar�AlJr,Tdlanl1(.^ I�Irhai11�•,P,.tYrnIIIrp,rvictla'A Wilp,ri=J TrTm»y, r nr,.ns, and un,p`div..P herbarr%V$ c ; . ,Irpa rrl Shc wavantl WInPa = 0 royal Irr P 1 Add kha noirts in sne hoers aniI ,4r Rafkq of Sib PMervOil I r snoro is:_12.14 a H _6-11 1 M _0-5 a t Renard Oise rmi+rd orr NIc H;,i I nnov R La Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the sate? R7l Itrt;r,W&TlAndWIluntN1barxarporarodrilyrayunlhiniL5rlfiAO yr.K=] Na=0 R22.DX5HIE a�nLIbut'nRtJs-,ntcthe wet 'and i--clufka',GAorincornciaIto. 37oaV Yc -I No•p R 2-3. Goes at least W%of the eontrbuting basin contain t, Ilea ie.3s, paswra., or farests that have beer• clew, c:,t vol thin IIIn In At 9 yr.A rn7 Vey = I No = 0 R 2-01 Is , 10%of the area within 15r1 it 4>1 thn uv o a nd In land uses that p rierato pollutants it Yes = 1 r.o= R T? 2 S. Ale tiiete miter sources ..f p-Olrutarts coming, Into the web3nd that are not Tasted In quatlons f1 2 ^---R 2-1 Oti-er %tul:Cr: Ye6 = 1 No = O Total for P. 2 Add the points in thr! hotaos abave Raflns of liandseape Mantiol 1Y soar* i,: 3-4? H 1 art. = M 4 = L RccvrL.r liar r rrffm yin the int ftapr R 3.0. Is kite wotes, qualkV improvement pirevided by the side valttablte to so iety? R i T IS thr wxtland alnnf$ n ,iFIjjM or r-1,P«r C i,t -s rn tTiv IrPfdl'Rt tar vn a Trihulary 11161 drain-, Ir pnp within I m' 1' Yea = t Pin = 0 R 3 2 Is rhr wntland alrvlti a sovarn or I.,Ier !hat NjasWM-11. Ilmits for nutrienrs, -oaths, or pathas9tiris'r Yes= 1 Ne=+u R 3.3. Has thes!te been IdennFred li4 a wat�-rslled e, ',)cal plait as Impcasarrr ful malitatrnng watEl quality? toliswer YFS it their is a r MM. far the drainPOc in wtieh thr .frgr di to+endl Yes - 2 No = 0 Total tra R 3 Add I?ie poinis In the bci vsab mm HaflTte of Yalaa 4 wnrr I-,; 2.4 = H 1 a M 041 Wiflbwl fl;-hilt h"dr•rn 1tw N4mvr.I is WA' 41'IT 10 fl.trtrw lnitn - 1.1kriltv 9ouuim. 1 -14)1 5 Record Al,r rnrirq rm 7IIF first nngP Crescent Environmental PLLC 40 Wrlltttld iwirliv III-Ilrurtrlivr_ RNERINE AND FRESHWATER TIDAL FRINGE WETLANDS "nda& Flimadmit 1ndbela Oust sfta fundtfong litgamiumilbodhWwo !t►lalt'l amsim R A,O. Does the site have the putential to redwe flooding and ercloon t R 4.1. Characler:stres +at ale Dwerbarlk smrege the wedand provOes: t•slirnore flit- awerayc ;Wnrh r7f the bwerkind ueYpLkia4wx rya rt,e dlie•cunve Lif the frow urlj the vrYam of rew t+eonw car rfverchonnr) ddrstance hetwurn hrlrAsl 06inldare the raric, ;averogr w;ddi of wrlianedl/rnvrrogr wleith of srreaoi between burrky IF She ratio is mare eo+an 20 ooinL - g If the ratio Is 10-20 T,olnts - ,� 11 thr l nl In is 5,111 lraint5 4 If McIatloIs I-:S Paints = Y It the ratio is, I points - 1 R al 7 Il arar.tCl'.51IC3 #I t+lanlF that slaw rlrlWn Wa[e r wr'1LY,iI X 5 d�+Rnl? !Ir rxi5 Trmf lorgr wAwx1y,1rbrF% rr, ronr 5r or .ihrub. _noose the polar, apRrcVfare for the Zest description (polp<ms rwd to hone YN# rare, a r person llGr',ph�f TI'+rsr. Mir h1[1F t;[rdt+pfrfirl t in csr'rl FaI esto+ shrub faI : / atea Lin emergentplanet ,'i..rea wino = 7 :ort�t of h+wruh far :• ;'; area 4F pmir nr plan > i areo roInL - 4 Pants do not meet above cNrertz points - 0 Total for H a Add owe paine. In the bases above Rating at Site Potential if score is._32-16 s H _6-11 x M _0-3 5 L Record the raring on nie rlrsr page it 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the hydrolopc functions of the srte2 R 5 1- 1; thr %V nnm r}+ riVr'r rnjacvm la ihr welIPrd dowrwnt ! Yr.s = n No = 1 R 5.2. Ums Ux UD-gradient wa ersheck Include a LIGA or Irr-orporanEI area? Yes 1 Na = tl R 5 3 is t*,e Ut: g•adlent stream or river cantrolted by rtamsr Yes - U Nr - 10ral Fix f4 S Add me paint In ehs byes above Rating of landsape PaterrtYf li Scrraa is:_d ■ H 1 or 2 a M _O a L RPcard the rating an tale flat page R 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions p"Ided by the slit valuable to socecty? r+, to rf.r ".erest a-"% tdowratir+lm IFwI h+avr+ l lkw%lir% prch�rrnr i 'Jloose idle destriprdan treat Lest firs vre stye Hit 54,;asiil imme:uiatrlp oomi-grddlel+t -if LYr Welland has fl::KAlr,g prnhlerns ihat Icsa,i il, J_+nage tO t lman or natural resources 0 p, , houses or aarmon rr dds} uolrtm - 2 `,ur Inc* fkjnding prohIerr., Mti In & surr-Laslri farther dawn-.y wwro pointy, = I Na faodirrg problems anywhere doemistrea-n volnts - 0 it 6.2. 1las Ind ;Irk kern Idrntlfied 41,. IrnPCUIdnr fpr elcrod klcllape dl IIDnd t.0tWryarlt:e Ill d It*j' O+lal 116MI C?)MMI Marl' Yes • 2 Na - 0 Total Irr R 6 Add tew polrrs In ruin hortna atsnvo Rating of Value ! .;e:r Ye i <;_7.•4 = H _3 = M _a = I. Wetiiuel9d;Nihll, tiv,rum fa+! Wr.+rrrn WA 'Pill 1 LlilaliHr. llallrl9 i tn7n - I.Ifertiva lrrrelldiY 1 2015 Rerurd J.nr. rorir W w` rhr frm I na qr Crescent Environmental PLLC 41 wetland tiame lit Plumber ry LAKE -FRINGE VV_ET ANDS IwlafM irra• ItIdt"101 that that k1LR Wit hLm- La fro L M. Does bite sloe how the pr�tlMW tc iRapime uJL Mr gwpty7 ! 1 1 &?wage width or plants along the Lakeshore fuse poygafn of ^owardin ckmses - paants V e *sere Loon 33 it 110 MI wide points = 6 Plants we more rMn 16 R 15 ml Wide and c33 it point= • 3 asnnts are more,. Than c it 17 rol wldp and e'1fi eI points = 1, Pra nts are less than 6 ft wide points = 0 1 1 7. Clearaeleelstim M the plants ih the wetland: Chmw ilia dppfopflaw desQiutlatl Il rat rewiT, III [Ile IIIghow paints, and esr� Aryl Inr:liede any dprn water Fr �i rstimtita nrrravr_raye- She hnrbert en,a points r�ri Ae e8htr The dominant form or as an understory In a shrub or rarest community, These are not Lowafalrr classes, Area P:Y eravrl h #OMI Cover in rhr. wart JwJ it can be in pe relies. hwbaceaus data twi rneJude aquasir bed. Cover of hefbacecli a plants is 9D% of the vegetated area mints - 6 alrro+ 0 11vbammua plans oy - / rA ihr vrr wtrd nrsa yalnts - 4 Qlyer of herbaceous plants is ,-� of the, ve,,atated area vofnts - 3 Other plants that are not eaivattt ued>' f ; ur:il rXilnts = ' Other plarts That are not aquatic bed +n � /, vagetsted area volntE Aquatic bed ;ants and open wafer covv > /. of the urtit LroiMs = 0 total for L L Add Ia1e palms In khe hniies aunty ItalLft aT yip Pat'lndat rr score is:_S-2Z a N _4-7 a M J0.3 : L mar and t he me" e:fa Me ciirst page L2A.Damthela daaaprihavethepMnpsltddstapporribevAo!rgLlaMly6ufi tianwaFtllrtalre� L 2-1. Is the lake used by power boats? Yes-1 No - 0 L 2.Z Is = 30%of the area Within 150 ft of wetland unit on &* upland sloe in land +ae:s that generate poilu to na? Yes = 1 rya = tt L 2.3. Does the lake hawa problems with algal blooms or excesslue pianr growth such as mllf&l7 Yes - 1 No 7 0 Total for L 2 Add tax points In the bcules above RMh%sir larelsaaps PaOatRfial: I f score is:_2 or 3 s N _1 -& M 0 a L Recard the ra" cr the Jifsa pope L &O. Is the vaster gtullty ImprivImmenl provlalall by the site valuable to LwctetVv 13 1 Is this Imke un ow 303 (dI Ilsl of degiadeed agaaatfe tr aaaurLes P Yes = 1 No = 0 L 3.2 Is th4 lake In a sub -basin where Water quality is an Issue fat least one aquatic resource in the basir ?son the 3n? tt IlsrtI Ye< = 1 No = O s 33. Her. the site been identlfled Ina watershed rw local clan as Impvftant to malntainutgwater quallty?Answer YES there is u 11MB! for the Joke or basin in Mifdi Lire urUt Ja FOUM. Yes = 2 No = D Total far r. 3 Add the points In the banes above RatFnl Of Viko if Xore 1%_i•4 a N ,_2 ■ M _0 a L Wetlatnl flLUbglt %V9VM 1011 Wevtrttl WA '.1`11 1 tllxf,te ILtrnse Fuiwn - I:ffecdtve loouaty 1 2015 Rrrvrd tar rori v an she irrrr perm Crescent Environmental PLLC 42 WPLI;aind ltairriv III- number _ LAKE FRINGE YItfILWDS WfdE2hMFlnx1km Indkatcrs tlwt the wetland unit functiclln to reduce Shrxaiw r arw1t)(+ lb�S?.�I�#leeftehauetlle tiwlAnteduoerFtalrelirreerosdrxt7 i4_1. Distance along shore and average width of Coward In lasses along the lakeshare Ada w Include Aquatic bed)! CwoseMe highestscannq descrlprAon rhotmatches candirions in the wetland - % 0t distance 4 Scrub -shrub or Forested at least 33 ft j 1p ml wide points - G � U ofolstanee s 5cru"lior" or t'oresiad at least5 fr P m) ride AOlnb = 4 -• X drstanae is Scrub-styub or Forested at least 33 ft (10 m) wile oolnts - 4 Plants are at least 6 ft (2 nr) wide rang type except Aquatic bed) points - d ftnts at0 Tess than G It 12 ml wide (any typo sumpt Aglwtle bad) 00lnts • n NathU at MW Patsnrlab If scare is _i s W 13.3 2 L Rend the ra rind an rheprsrlimge MIX X D©es•tlte kndmape have the patendal taauppork qua htrdr yrfilnaaotn aR the she? (5 1. Is" lake used by power baste with mime Illan.11l prp7 Visa = I Nct = O t 5 2, la Iha tett:h on the rake site al the unit at Ieast 1 mitt• in dlstancel Vin _ 1 No= A Total Irx L 5 Add the points In I hs banes ogbaw NOW at kattdatepir PasoMfal 1t scare Is. --Z s H _ 1=M _-0 rw L L co. Ate the hydroloalc li+nctlatis praWdmd Iry rho siltrltaltuhlaZ tQ iltrslltyi Rccvrd the rarfr!g on flraiirsr page L 5-1. Are there resources a long the shore that can be lmpactiad by eroslnn4 If more than one resource Is ana5¢flt, choose die one wltlr the hlgnest scare_ There are human structumor okf grawthimature forests within 25 it of 04WM of the share to the unit points = 1 There are nature trails or other paths and recreational activlties wimin ZS ft or DHWM Points • 1 Other rnsaurex,a that could kw Impietdd bV arodan pillars - 1 There are no resaurtes that tan ba impiamd by erosion along the snores of the unit courts. 0 Natkill cif Valois, rf shore ls:_Z a It l a ltA _0 3 t Record the rating on the ,+lrsrpage NOTES and FIELD OBSERVATIONS: Wetlanef Oid1nM `ystunrr fur W410rrrrl WA' 21111 u1xL•eW III RAlhw Farm - [:rlocltrru lauuary 1 -1015 Crescent Environmental PLLC 43 1JVtete i3d ttame or iiumher_Plcchar SLOPE WETLANDS Water Qua IltyFumtsom trulleatomflial flit- site lone torn. tea ciripr+We wage-r rftiaHlb S L L.BcNirtfitifaflite have 4ha pofdeftd#1 to Impatiwe water qua]"? 51.1 Ohm acterfatres of me averaige srwpe of the wetland: 0 1%salW ilia a � f► verwul drop M ehrvatifin foe every 100 ff a l horimmial dfwaneej Slope is 1%of less wlnts 3 Slope fs IWV7. 6 pair+. = I Slope is 2%5% points 3 Slope (so pate•+ mart 5% Points v 0 1 r 4 trita clay or true orgarlre ftaut-NRC540ey Weis): Yea - 3 No -a 51.3. Characterfsticcs of ttre prance In the Wetland that irap sediments and pollutants Mama the points appropriate rr r die desolation the? best nts the punm in the wetland, fterlse meflm you haW* froUEilC nef/i'9 f he fa(! StR f w I-b7511 raver), and uneuf morns Pal gra rd at tnowen and Pllants are hogile- then s In. Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants } 90%of the wvdar%d ama rratnts � � Ueme, uncut. herbaoecmA plants ,,�'4 of area points, = 3 Dense, Wooft plants > t; of area polrmis = 1 Dense, uncut, herbaaeoufs plants 2. 14 of area poirns - 1 Oftb not "peal arcy of the cli'terIn above for E114tuA calms = 0 Tttat for S 1 Add the poems in the boons above 1 tldtMeiw9ltaPawallal rfsmreisrll2zit &11=flit l_M=L Rerondthe totingarirhejfbstpage 5 ZAX Deus the lanttdeape heat flea om"tfal, to support the water Qw1hy [means" aF Cite arm? 5 2.L Is 1, 1041,of the area within LSO ft an the uphill side of the wetlana in land uses thatgeneraw pollutants? Yes, i No- C 574 Are Oust othersou•ctis of oollutandoamittta into the Wetland that arc not listed In question S 2 It saunas Yet- = I No - 0 Total for S 2 Add the points In Clue banes above HKOW of lurrdlim" PoWntYl If soare Ist_1-Z a M ,LO a L Rward die raring on the jlrat page S 3A, lb the wouer guellty improaemarit pm owed by the stile geluable to tfocdety? 533 Dom me wetland discharge dlreetiy fi.e., within 1 MI) toe SUealn, rryer, hake, at manna Neater -jest lean tre 3n(d I I IWI Yes • 1 No - 0 5 3.2 Is Cate wetland rn a oasln or sub -basin where wamer qual Icy is an issue? Ar least ogre aquaric ramarre in the basin ir an else Xgid,� liar, Yes = 1 Nn = 0 5 3.3, Has the site been ld=nttTtsd In a watersnad or local ptit n as important for ma:ntalning waW quality 0 Arnwrf YES If there fs a TM& far Me basin in wtik h urdr 0 jnund. Yes = 2 Nn = 0 i local for 53 Add the pairm In ilia bones above r Aatfiy of lltakas rf scone 1„_2-4 e H _3 a M I_a s L WerktirW Ratting tiVsrum for Weviorn WA- 2011 t.ilxl,te IL'uhro Form -1 11setive Iauuary 1 PfI 15 Rwaro dte.raorrg Orr the first Page Crescent Environmental PLLC 44 WeLlalld lfanle ilrrtumher_ SLOPE W i ANGS 14Wroloak Funet am IndIts lot s tl,,et 10w site (wItIirII rs Iu I"Llr:e flondrMk al+d w " f 0 ofU+tal+ I S CO. onou tme i to iw ve the patglttvl'toMi6to d.1. Charatlerlaks of pewrq tiei mdlsw tat waintlty of Morare (1oW! dwMentormm:[6�ogse tiv pdMO spry+oprfere for the description that best fits condrtlons In the wetland, SMns of pkmts sbgakf br thick ear+or gh iratmfh x x�: dal• to dense a norgh, to mmon arrear durfirg ,swr ac* fhtays Dense. unult, rid olents cove+ i. W%of the area of ttr wetland paints m 1 All other conditions p2lnt5 = 0 fl/tillli of Site peitiapt1al If start: is:_ 1- M l 0 = t Rcwrd Nor tnfingon ffieftlsi page S 5.0. Does the lefrdarspe hove Ilhe poWntlef to aepport. the *drolegic ftrttt:*n of dwaitft7 53.1. Is more rhan Mo►the area within 150 it upslape of wrlland In land Len or onvmf that ganartrlt swtess surfacertmaff7 Yes=1 No-0 gathy pf tandaeepa ftionthl If scoreis;-1 _ M r o _ L Recatd the rating on t0fl►st page s SA. awe the hydrologic functtans provided by Ow. site veluable to wolooty to 56,1 Distane. fn the roes,90 arnaa downatream mist nave flooding prohlama_ The sub -basin IMmadiaterVdo'An•µraddent of site has floodfng problems that result In damage to human or na tuna I resources [e. &, natmi ar salmon reddsf pointy, = 2 Surfwm flooding prohM rra are in if sub. basin forlher down itradiena points - 1 No floodlog problems anywhere downstream Polms - 0 Sb,21, Has tha.lGr been Idr!Mrrlied as It►u+rxtarn tar @rx)d sMraila er flood torr+eyanar In of regit+rral fir control plena Yes-2 No-0 total for 5 6 Add the pants In the bales above rlatlfis of Valtfr f scrxor fa;_7-4 = N _1 o M Ltl T L Record Nor raring an fhe fast poor NOTES and FIELD OBSERVATIONS: We,koond IivlIng tiyst(,,m lur Wwavrn WA' 201 1111x1atr; I rfaltmPortw- Firkwiliveloouary 1 20B Crescent Environmental PLLC 45 Wctlaild 11.11114, Ill- I1tnt11wr -IIJL»,l_.' Them qu*Bftdi applyto'erita tWis Will HUN claum. HABITAT FUNCTIONS Inditistm that site fWnclions to ravtde important hawlet H I.G. Does the site have the pollential to provide habitat? Ft 1 1 air u:.tum M pl.lnr Lcrmmirnitt. Jrldimwirs rrhr ; �wurdin rArw-vt wid stmiq wifirion Inr, rrrrr-u+dr:krst Thera: Ihs Cowar-11-r pleat Classes .n the wiptland. Up to 10poiches nav be combined for each ciass w meet rke rhresirakl nl %w. w nl7rr- Ihnn dL%s -',i Irrr u,nrr fr of rY Ninuf;r1 than ). , tic. Adj rnr nwrhrrq elrurJrne+ i'hI'0kVI _All Jattc baa 4 strlv=aes or mR'= polris = rl Larne•gent ! structures po,rns = . — Scruo-5hr ub i a reds whC,ra! ahtubs have - 3i x, nows r l 2 s7uctit* es: parts - 1 If thrt unft nos a Forested doss. rheCx fij: 55ri tiwrr: point, _ [) The FoiRmon plip57. Wi4 3 rail ur 4 Nlrata lron;;pg, •-urrcaru.pY, -mrLIblg, hsrb:lr+IMkl'ti. MMI?#rptrnrr•C*VQ-I _ Forested !areas *i-ere trees have . 30% oavarl that adrh rove- hr/f wr'lrs,n lhr Pal mrrd poiygL'n i • 11 1.2, Hydiapeiods uneck the IyL`&e of water regimes rnyrlraperletl;l present w-rh-n rhe'wetfa i hz waver regime has +.o cowe i rriol n th.-in 12N nr ghn worli ld nr 'd ar, No mnnl Iscr rrrt frlr rfirr rrfir7aJnryy rJ,f dr%draljrvrKide I armar .ntiyfloodedaInusmatea da•InDretypesw.°esent:polou=i _ _�*asonal'y flooded or Inundated 3 types Feesent: pants 2 _s—I.accaslonelly it ocoed or Inundated 2 type,, present: points 1 SAtvsrn utif Daily t I V V- F e5en l- Min P 0 _4umanerilly fl--wingstrearn a ruer n, GI edlazemm. the wet�,nd ---:)e,rssinerlyf Flowing .lr ran, rl, last sdiaCYt-r ru, the we9 Apd _hire Frirtp wetNtpd 2 points _ Froahrepow tidal *retilmd 7 ppinh +I 13 R chness of plant saecic. C auka the •olrnWw elf wain 51Jet: mW Iry the we ilarfj it rat i _rYr-1 Yt .r. S1 10 fr Airferenr parcki Jf the Some sisKve , Can bf conjbAnM To meer the stie virerrim'd and poLj •da cur fio,•e rc nan rfu- s (rrr..*., Do not Nrlilude Fvriddon ndtfelf, rated crisraeryrow, dwrpfir imsexeriA [amtdfofr thistle I f yai cc -unwed - 1? sp acles pouts .- 2 S - 'A spe Les pants = 1 ... 5!.px7des -i IA lwrerspersion of hab tam G: ridr Imm thr, diagrams r.. Irnk whrlF+!r* ! nr�*-p�* icrn arncsn,� C ,rarrll t rinnls tias srs Ic�R itu j ih Y 111, :ar lho classes and Ilryvaetated aneus (cars Irstl!_Ice oper water or nladldats) Is WFh, moderate, lc.w, or none, ft hovejraur or lC.Jrr plr]r,f G'assr ur ihnseciassea and oilers a'Lrrer, fP,e rcJ'ny rs odrY�ys fuy}a. None = Q pull, L low = 1 polnl Moderate = 2 W: i•nts ALlr thrDe draRrams hr gri�ri�W are HIGH - 3polrts 1I W!ulWhill fi;llarl,it `y'.tum Jill Wiartei o WA ; M 1 IllulMr RAilror Iteim- I:hk•rtiv Ireuurr!- 1 20B Crescent Environmental PLLC 46 WiAlijttrl iianiv m-ntuliher 15. SpiYial habltaI raat,irex: CntgLk [ale haliltaI faeturvs "I are prawn; In the werlaW. l he numbs rjcriErka ii the aawber c,ffvalnu. —4,arge. downed, waodv debris within the wetland {-• A in drarn._ter and E it Ion@I —Standing.s9eip (dbh . A �nI within the we;land vildricu9r)--inksarm pres.rnfnoratk-at[66ftl2m¢and/vr te.hanpingelanisextondsatbassi.?.3ItlynII over a scream lot dItchI In, or contlgwus M!n the vietland, for at leas; 33 h {lu ml _ __Stable stamp Wnk.e of (in- malarial that mf4rht on ,Afr d by' beat, ar muskrat for derrnrnR 1 ?f' wgma slope) CIR signs cr secant beaver 3r-tiyity are present scut 5hri&s or 2rc4LI5 fhaf Ra4K not yet weathered WIWI, wL"d 0 eeUr+sed'f —At least `a ac of thin -stemmed persistent plants or wco2 f hrarrcnes are pre -sent in areas drat are perrnanenrly ar !4ujnallv ni;ndatrd isfrurIurey feu egg Psi i. k� altnlif lb orftj nvasIvE pants caner less than 25% of the'Aietland area In every stratum of rsants I,see ri 2 1 for Ast c¢ strata? Total for H 1 Add the points In Lc oozes atoove f Ratht! of Ske 111MOmtiiAl fir %viref it; _15-14 = 0 _7.14 = M _46 = L RWOrd fhe rating 9n the first fut4r H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to sopport the hihltat functlonsof the site? I k2-A%%r7lai habitat Ilhcludn away haMierr rhur Wit-0 ip shuts were" Nd ilI rahryvtnte, 9s,ue-4imormdhabital_+({9}mudnanteand It?wIntewiityl4r-4uses}/21,= % If Wral acteeaible habitac+s: I- i33 3�j or 1 km Polyfjon points • 3 20-33sof 1 P.m Polygon poirus 2 14 lq%of 1 kr'n Pdygrrl prnnf9= i :0+ aF l km i'etypn points = 0 le 1 ? thrdlanubrd hahitai Iri f krn Poly got wL*Jrid ifir. *r_fiaric ?i-ricointe %iiFrllst.trl?ed hbhirnl�+lI%mud9nite xnd low InterrityInmc jw*) �'�_= W and isu, rbed l lab ltai -= 50 +v of Polifoxi weArrt_ = 3 Iindasturbee habitat 10-50%arid in 1�3 patches points - 2 i PidiLrLrhed liabliaa It-W%arti e ? patehem polnrs= t tind4luoijud habdAt � ILYA i71 1 kin Prilyllcm points - 0 l H 2 3 Lana Lee Intensity Ir 1 xm nalytiron: If `-•0?r sir I km PrlyLuxi N hipt,, IrfrnwrpWrld uw ucint. _ { 3.} 50%of1knit porv-oanlshie, Intensity into -ti tl Total for H 2 A7d the l3dnti in the haK[ts allots Rath%of Landsapfi Pa"Utfat if score Is: — 4-4 1 h — L-3 * M (I c 1 M t Record the rdffhq on tlir- first POQL H 3,0, is the habitat provided by the site valuable la scidety? y i.l. Wei the site provldr- hat:.raF for species Val urd In laws, Te@A rions, tv pM cles? O'yoose ont, the ii!ahrtst sew lim I oWfsa to rlie wellund brim rnfM(j. ;Are meets ANV of the follaWing criteria: wins = d — It has 3 a nitre pnonty habitats within 160 m (see next page! — it prevldes nabftet for Threatener or Endangered species;any pant or animal c7n'.t)e start ar federal lists) — It Is +napped as a loeaoou fol an Indlviduai WUPW oriorlty spades — It Is a Wedard of HqP Conservation Value as determined by the i}epmrtment of Natural Resources — It has been catWrlied as an irripoi sans lie birm sire In a Inca oo reglarial WrnpreherMve pian, in 9 SliowAiw Mattel mall.. of III ei weteryhed plan Sire has 1 or 2orari-v habitats {llsma on nexr ci&Wt wirh-n 100 m points- 1 patina of Value l f scar a Is`2 = M _i= ft4O = L Walklind R:lrirlN. by ovrrt imif Wt,Niei it WA ''fit i fllAmE, R:tnaar Ftrrni - [alecilvr louurr. 1 21015 Nrrnvd the rating on the frrsrpogl Crescent Environmental PLLC 47 18r'0t1rold 111111 a' ill- Illlrlllier WDFW Priority Habitats ' 1 .+'lTnlplrin ticwl r11111r1rl1 Y}f WIPf W prltltilr' hiillil.11a. rfti IJIV L11nILIIti in Whlr'h I bfy L"an 114 Inunit in; Washington llrlrlrimenl rlf Irish amJ Wihlllhu. 'EIMU, l'rktrilp I Iiihilal and Symi s 1,1s1 OlvnipLo, Wrichi"On 1 ;+7 11p• r 1N-MI-V911, h lllllil\+II[I 11i � {y &VOili ! IdI aJr` 4j% •t-_ky the ILtil fl►fill hL.16, Ili] lh, NMI MIfur_wa.uv4-! LLItl+l4 v W It Ill I i11L9Awi I:LuU,tIIII nt'ill»rlNill lllu(J)1ItMinsrltJl,1-Jlvhuhllnls.1rr15'ilhinad;Itlhllllilmlufllo,•vtedieMlunll NUl'a<� thl..1yon.1rwrJ1, in,k'rl+:raJanJ i•f rhr.• i-urJrrcr¢lrcatvt'cn liae rwll'rrflrl unrc umi rJn, irliur(1�' ilni,ifur Aspen Standw Pill eIII mixed s1:111Js11t':1llixiipitsttim Rum t:u J11.4 ha I. — dlodivtttrolly Altar orld Curtidom Arein, of hahum Iha1 art- rx-Havel¢' impartanl rn vanons SPIKI's ql t1.11rv3: fish dad w1111111V (J" W1`JFI1+1J1i,5'rr.yrnrrI — Herbmuallus Baldin ilrrlahle sl:�e l?all'hcs of gtass,lrul G?1i+s i,R sllrlUTLy CoIl5 L?VCr Ilelinxk - Old -growl h{tilalnrLbirusty oi4L•=%yilloWMLillI..,rATddgrruS1 Stands Ito illleast21fteyp1vwq,It,raiirig :linnIIi kryelva1•:rt1.IMWilli t1twoSltJIMI%m1111lipulklllKv, With illI(1:L51ItIreo"q.u:12(Ige"1hlr) A?. Ill lB1Lroll) Jhll+rr:?1J11 yq,l rs 11f i ip. Milun • Iorv. Ls - Midthl ti whit live agn IJtamrlr•r % "vitty IYng ; 1 II I (`43 ti ne) MAI; I TO r11/ri v11vr.1 m.ta ha le a th all 101 %; due: y, mitilubui% "I st1mM.N. Md 111a:111I1A4 1rl 1a11!ke• d0wll..•d Stuble.rhil a5 el'-ner;llkl' le%% IlLnn Mal foo llll too I AC1, prt, W l ll a 1JI1 1011 4'Lrlr ti t,l d voe{ I of I It I, I. t INei etl,L' t'a 611 — 0reRuik WhlleCall, Witz&inilslaInks of pkiiv jmkalro,Ll4,can1Lei niistICt:11/r1115 Moore rinopr, LuV rnRl: ill We oillt utunplllBni kImpurlim] I. (,JuFi rrrfnr,cln 1VJJ1,J1)111(5reporr r," I.'dl - iv( 11M,hhrlktihrjlr'l• Rlparkmit: I'llm ai-4&i YuJlaLwnI it) 11Llu211e tgtilcnls 1•rnh 11t1W11IR 11'i111t 111141 i:t?ItL•LILISLIM1L11M ill h1l(h.11quA11L aunt lernestrinl mawoems which mldutdly" lnliLpium caeh of Ilea. — WtIMIde Mralrim. 1141-1Ri mmIi, llnn• fumtill'Il l,hlIli 41mnn(1litilH •% that l im H Iher 1,111t IIIV 101-M 0If it Llrlh prllrle(?r a! Wi 1lrtiirit irJl Aryl ri1 Prrr7s in LYiIr 11' i'Prs 1x �rYrr r: 11 1 .r,4 ilk !, IIlik a6.Iw') — Instreanl: The ei-imbinallrlll 01 1111i'st4Y11, hki141R11LeIl..ulJ 1.1koUlleol lllaR-satl4 iud LlrndilMplis 4klrll IlllUriRl 11? 1111rp141L Fulxiwnal We hlslrlry mquiremcnls Inrutslrtam I1sIl auJ lssllllite res<-]urees. Mulrrbnlx;: I{LJInlWvly a11r11+iurhrJ Irr;Irahluc h:thit:alb, 1 brsc• Inrlullr 11r.�51at1 Neanhurr, upl'n I.uiol Mulrrshun:, imll I'llMet 51,t1ra1 NVIIINluure.&111,4alr✓Jill Nit Jgrl,oiM` ii,r j I clullle.Jv in 11'.011V ayt,,rl - ,N.tM4 011k,erlprujJr+Jrsinl�rt� — UVIU : A naluralhr wcurring cavYl V, rut'es+, tiolEi, ur S} sl�em crl rnrenourlccWd passaltes unJer Ilse rrlrth Jlt sails, rxx k Irv, Lrr4aher tilrrlllgioil Itwinalians and ks largvuvranRh bT rtmlain a bit roan —(3i(fa:lilealclIh+nlwryII17itIltllllollrind mewrionithelinv5Y11111"r•Ievallrm — l'alux Jltllttagennns areasill rah rubhk ranging in avemi;p swc 0 5 l,.5 it IU.is ":-IB m), LonlpaxEd of iNtrialt, andesnc, .tnrllur wdinounwory 111l K im I11I.Di it rilinop sklIm and mute ruillrig v A1111' he' .Lssllckalrll t+rilh r1H7r' — Snmppand Leer: 'I1cet areilrllilJLgLv15+tUys U the} AFL, de -aid -ril'dy'Ijig ?IMvulltbLI su(Iir:IMdetimt•rhml'arlerlellLstt- cslable easily excavaIirini use by Wacok'e I'rkorily snags llnvv a diameter til bt�tsi height ut , 20In Jr. L rrn) In weslertl Washknl,tall andare: 6.5 tl 12 rut 1nheighl, prlonty 4rus am . 1: In (30 e1n1Indkameler,It Illy lu•aestend aril .2911 L(k m I Y?n8: Nutea All vekeleked we1L11uisare by deluililcrt a prLudly ILLb1L611 hul ato nol iwludad in Ibis W be cruse llwy my addresvEsl ulsewhelll•, WalE,titNl RnlinN tiy�,1t-Tlltld We4rtrrrl WA �(11 11(Iltt,le 1Ld11at Fn1Yl1- lslierih i Irnwart 1 21115 Crescent Environmental PLLC 48 Wetland llanI + 01- nurtthrr _ CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Welland type - Cstl llt'y - oVrA ajr flap ir►terar )fat- the STNM When tze OW (UFrfare ahtr Tm are •14'r SC LCL EstLatinowallarids rxies me wetland meet the fallowing croseffe for t-stuarine wetlands? the dominant water regime is ridat, Vegetated, and W h h a saalnlW p=Ler than U S opt Yes -t o W St 1.11 No= Not ant aataarlae Wetland % 1 1 +e ute w watld within a National VVIldilfa Refr>ge National park, National EttuetV wy,anat, Natural Area r-reserve, 5tatir Park or 6jucational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated omder WAC 332.30.1317 vas =Caitigory► No-Ciolo5SL2 Cat.? Sr 1.2 as thin watland wilt of matt L ac In sire and meets at *tit 1Wo or the Iallv%inR thme 4ondltiorrst The Wetland iv rvtrrtlysIV undrr;twbed (ha= norliking dttt lr% lilhn8, cultivation, pricing, and ons labs then IM4rrnar of non native PlantwK(es (II nommauivespedef; are Sparrinv, rase pap25) Cat t — At least % or rte landward edge of the wetland has a i0t1 it tmifer of stir ub, rarest, or un-Waxed or un- trtrtwea graesiand dt. tt fire wetland has at lexist two of the falrawingfeatures; Wait dmnneis, depresslons wfth oparn wBtei, or contlgtrtursheshxater wellonda. Yes - click iryI Nrr-CoWorVR St 2,a VM@fr* of High Cansanration Volta (WKCV) SC 2 1. Ptst the VITA toaeetnreni of Wwral Renrrrced updatud Then wapbllr M Incwdb the Ilia of Yyeftendb of High Consarvation Value? Yes - Go to K 2.2 No - Go to SC Ll cat I SC 7.1_ r, Inn wetland Isstr.d an OW WDNR dataoaae as a Wfrdarrd of I ken CernseWetirsn Velur? Ve' j caaago, I No a Not a W"CV SC 1.3 ly Me Wttlarid in a 5ectlanlrc3WMhlpjR&Mae that eontal-e. a Natural aaelstage w4mandi r+�tc+�lvvnwl�nr ��er„lr±sotrttdask�Sjia't��,$�W aw"�'-��p, rinds nd1 Yef- ranfeat WNWIWDNM oW go to Sc 2.4 Na = Nat a 1NMt[V SZ p1,4 Etas WIINR Identl(Ted rha wedarvf wlihln lfe SITIti as a Warnartd or rilgh C inserV4tiorl Value and ItNad It Lin their wetisitO res =Ca rY I No =blot a YMM 5C 3.a Molts Does the wedarn' Or any part of Mno LM10 meet bath 0-w criteria for sills and ua®etation in bogs) Use tnr Tory 4efrow. llyou ditawor lS yeu w ldstfp nand do now the mdand bond an fb ftmotfarta, 5C 3 1 Dias an erea Within the welland arsit have on9arrtr sofii hortrons dilhrrr peals or much, That compose 16 in pr acre of the first 32 In of the earl pirastlle? Yes -fao to SC 3.3 No - Gil w SC i.r Sr 3 2 Mrs an area WiMln Ito Wr!tland Anil hSve urgarnir-,a,U„ 04thef Patois or mur im, that are lets !Ran 16In dear, over bedrock, or.an impermeable hardparr such as tray of vulcarrc asn, or that are Roatingon top of a lake or Para? lei - Go to Sc 3,1 No = to nee a hag 5,733 Does ar, area wiih peaky mraoks have morn than 70%never )al innsses at ground. larval, AN al leasta 30% soccer of Omit species I lsted In T able a7 Yes = h a Category I hag too - Go to St 3.4 NOTE. If Votr alp arnrortirn aboul tfre ektent rf ri"r ro i+t tiro-inderttary, You ruby bubatlluto that triterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a Iwle dr,p a[ least Lb In deep. If the pH Is less wren 5_0 and the Plan spades In 1abio a ere prasont, the Welland Is a htg r SC 3.4 rs an area voth pears at m�eks Forested (a 30Kcaveri wlih 5ltka sprur:e, subatpine Fir, western real cedar, We.�iti-.rhhatrIack.indgrapolapins,carlakingasfwn, Erygrh•tatin qmi rr, rx 4m mirnwhirrpint, AND 4Ply 01 th+ spesclea (or combination of speCles f Ilsted , n Table 4 provide more Aran 30% of the toyer under the canopy? Van=IaaC*%6 y1bft flu=Itflatr Woltatiti R;01rll0'l wtvrn itli'Wv-ttern WA- '111 1 Allmlote RattnatnIM-LI-11 ltvt:loataalnr 1 :1.015 Crescent Environmental PLLC 49 Wetland namc or number 9C 41L Fantsted Wetlands Does the wetland have at least 1 caa9zggus acre of forest that meets one of these criteria for the WA Department of Fish and W1dl Ih's tweets as priority habilats? f/yew amww M yet w0stY and to rota ahr wathnd band an &a jbaetlenr. — 0M.S owth forests (west of Cascade crestj: Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multHayered canopy with occasional smal I openPngs; with at least 8 tress/at (20 trees/ha) Chet are at least 200 years of age OR have a dfameter at breast height (dbh) of 32 In (81 cm) or more. — Moves forests (west of the Cascade Crest): Stands where the largest trees are 80. 200 years old OR the species that make up the canopy have an averages dfamotor tdbh) esceed1%21 in 153 cash. Yes: Category 1 No n Not a forested watlsnd for the section CaL I 9C 5A Wedandit In Coastal Layootts Does the wetland meet all of the following criteda of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? — The wetland Iles In a depression ad)acent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbank%, gavel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rucks — The lagoon In which the wetland Is located contains ponded water that Is so lire a bracklsh (} U.5 pptj during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs fo be rat+ ured near the bottom) cat, I Yes — Go to K 5.1 No = Not a watlond Ina coastal logaon 5C 5.1. Wes the wetland meet al I of the following throe condtionsr — The wedend Is relatively undisturbed (hes no diking, dltching, filiing, oulthretlon, grazingj, and has lass than W%eover of aggressive, opportunistic pia nt species (see list of species an p. 1W), cot,11 —At least ii of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un- mowed grassland. — the wetland Is larger than'/,,, ac (4350 fly) Yes ■ category 1 No • Category 11 SC BA. Inteeduniel Wetlands Is the wetland west of the 1M line (also atlod the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)7 Of you onwr Iran you wf# a W need to rote the vw MW based an ittr habitat*ndians. In practical terms that masns the following Swilraphle areas: — Long Beach Panlrouls, lands west of SR 103 — Grayland-Wastport: Lands west of 5R 105 cat I — Ocesn 5hores-C4pahs: Lands west of 5R 115 and SR WS Yes — Go to lit 6.1 No • not an irstaMunal vwatlsnd far rating SC 6.1. Is the wetland 1 ac or larger and scores an 8 or for the habitatfunctions on the form (rates H,H,H or H,H,M CA N for the three aspects of functlon)? Yes = catogary I No —Go to SC 62 SC 8,2. is the wetland 1 ac ce larger, or is It in a moWc of wetlands Cher Is i ac or larger? Yes . Category II No —Go to K 0.3 C UI 5C 6.3. is the unit between 0.1 and 1 ac, or Is It fn a mosaic of wetlands that is between ii i and Jae? Yes. Cowry III No ■ Category IV COL IV Category et wetland YaBed on swbl Chsraewerlstks :f ypu ansvmmd No for all tVM enter *Not Applicable" on Summary Form Wetland Rating 9yslero for Western WA. 2014 Update 17 Ratlnpt Form — F.fkotive January 1, 2n 15 Crescent Environmental PLLC 50 Wetland name or number This page left blank lmatrtlonaRy Watland Rating 9ystam for Western WA: 2014 Update 18 Rating Form —Effective lonmery 1, 21115 Crescent Environmental PLLC 51 Appendix C: Jefferson County Critical Areas Code Article VII. Wetlands 18.22.290 Stewardship alternative. Article VII sets forth the prescriptive requirements for wetlands. Applicants for development permits or approvals subject to this article may elect to comply with the critical area stewardship plan (CASP) provisions set forth in Article IX of this chapter in lieu of the prescriptive requirements set forth herein. CASP may be applied within Category II, III, and IV wetlands and buffers, and within buffers in Category I. They cannot be used in Category I wetlands. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.300 Classification/designation. (1) Classification. Wetlands shall be classified using the 2004 Washington State Department of Ecology's Wetland Rating System for Western Washington (Ecology Publication No. 04-06- 025), or as amended. Wetland rating categories shall not be determined based upon illegal modification of the land. Wetland delineations shall be determined by using the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual, March 1997, or as amended hereafter. (2) Designation. As determined using the 1997 Washington State Department of Ecology's Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (Ecology Publication No. 96- 94 or as amended), wetlands shall be designated as critical areas and regulated under this article regardless of size; provided, that Category IV wetlands less than one -tenth acre (4,356 square feet) shall be exempt from the requirements of this article when all of the following criteria are met: (a) The wetland does not provide breeding habitat for native amphibian species. Breeding habitat is indicated by adequate and stable seasonal inundation, presence of thin -stemmed emergent vegetation, and clean water; (b) The wetland does not have unique characteristics that would be difficult to replace through standard compensatory mitigation practices; (c) The wetland is not located within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area (FWHCA) as defined in the section of this chapter dealing with FWHCAs, and is not integral to the maintenance of habitat functions of an FWHCA; (d) The wetland is not located within a floodplain; (e) The wetland is not associated with a shoreline of the state as defined by the county's shoreline master program; (f) The wetland is not part of a mosaic of wetlands and uplands, as determined using the Crescent Environmental PLLC 52 guidance provided in the wetland rating system. (3) Sources Used for Identification. The following sources should be used to identify potential wetland locations. Sources include, but are not limited to: (a) United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory. (b) United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of Jefferson County Areas, Washington. (c) United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Hydric Soils List, Jefferson County Area. (d) County critical areas mapping. The wetland maps prepared by the county have been produced for informational purposes only and are not regulatory devices forming an integral part of this article. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.310 Regulated activities. Any land use or development activity shall be subject to the provisions of this Article VII, including, but not limited to, the following activities that are directly undertaken or originate in a regulated wetland or its buffer, unless exempted under JCC 18.22.070: (1) The removal, excavation, grading, or dredging of material of any kind, including the construction of ponds and trails; (2) The dumping or discharging of any material, or placement of any fill; (3) The draining, flooding, or disturbing of the wetland water level or water table; (4) The driving of pilings; (5) The placing of obstructions; (6) The construction, reconstruction, demolition, or expansion of any structure; (7) The destruction or alteration of wetland vegetation through clearing, harvesting, shading, intentional burning, application of herbicides or pesticides, or planting of vegetation that would alter the character of a regulated wetland; provided, that these activities are not part of a forest practice governed under Chapter 76.09 RCW (Forest Practices Act) and its rules; (8) Activities that result in: (a) A significant change of water temperature; Crescent Environmental PLLC 53 (b) A significant change of physical or chemical characteristics of wetlands water sources, including quantity; or (c) The introduction of pollutants; or (9) Wetland Buffers. In addition to those activities allowed in regulated wetlands in this article, the following activities are allowed within wetland buffers without having to meet the protection standards or requirements for wetland studies or mitigation, set forth in this article; provided, that impacts to buffers are minimized and that disturbed areas are immediately restored except as specifically allowed in JCC 18.22.070. (a) Activities having minimal adverse impacts on buffers and no adverse impacts on regulated wetlands. These include low intensity, passive recreational activities, such as pervious trails, nonpermanent wildlife watching blinds, scientific or educational activities, and sports fishing or hunting. Trails within buffers shall be designed to minimize impacts to the wetland, and shall not include any impervious surfaces. (b) Within the buffers of Category III and IV wetlands only, vegetation -lined swales designed for storm water management or conveyance when topographic restraints determine there are no other upland alternative locations. Swales used for detention purposes may only be placed in the outer 25 percent of the buffer. Conveyance swales may be placed through the buffer, if necessary. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.330 Protection standards. (1) General. Application for a project on a parcel of real property containing a designated wetland or its buffer shall adhere to the requirements set forth below. (2) Delineation. An applicant submitting a project application shall also submit, and have approved, a wetland delineation report as specified in JCC 18.22.450. Additionally, the following provisions shall apply: (a) The location of the wetland and its boundary shall be determined through the performance of a field investigation utilizing the methodology contained in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual, March 1997, or as amended hereafter. (b) If the wetland is located off of the property involved in the project application and is inaccessible, the best available information shall be used to determine the wetland boundary and category. (c) The wetland boundary shall be staked or flagged in the field. (d) This requirement may be waived under the following circumstances: (i) Single -Family Residences. The requirement for a wetland delineation and special report may be waived by the administrator for construction of a single-family residence on an existing lot of Crescent Environmental PLLC 54 record if DCD staff or a qualified wetland evaluator determines that: (A) Sufficient information exists for staff to estimate the boundaries of a wetland without a delineation; and (B) The single-family residence and all accessory structures and uses are not proposed to be located within the distances identified in Table 18.22.330(1) from the estimated wetland boundary. "Qualified wetland evaluator" means an individual recognized and acceptable to the administrator in using the most current edition of the Department of Ecology's Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington (2004), Ecology Publication No. 04-06-025, or as amended, in categorizing and rating wetlands. (ii) Subdivisions and Short Subdivisions. The requirement for a wetland delineation and special report will be waived for subdivisions and short subdivisions of an existing lot of record if a site assessment made by a qualified wetland evaluator indicates the following: (A) Sufficient information exists to estimate the boundaries of a wetland without a delineation; and (B) Building envelopes or building setback lines are not proposed to be located within the distances identified in Tables 18.22.330(1), (2) and (3) from the estimated wetland boundary. (3) Wetland Buffer Requirements. Wetland buffer widths shall be prescribed and established based upon the category of the wetland, the wetland rating scores and the impact level of the proposed land use. The resulting buffers are shown in Tables 18.22.330(1), (2), and (3) (for low, moderate and high impact land uses). (a) The category and rating scores of a wetland shall be determined by a qualified wetland evaluator who must be recognized and acceptable to the administrator and use the most current edition of the Department of Ecology's "Wetlands in Washington State Volume 2: Guidance for Protecting and Managing Wetlands" (DOE Publication No. 05-06-0008) in categorizing and rating wetlands. (b) There are three land use impact level types. Each type is presented with the table containing the buffer widths that would be prescribed for its associated wetland category. (c) Proposals for development will have three options for deciding what their buffer distance will be. A buffer distance is the closest distance the proposed development can be to the wetland boundary. (i) The stewardship plan option, as detailed in Article IX of this chapter. (ii) The Professionally Delineated Boundary Option. A prescriptive buffer distance based on an actual delineation of the wetland boundary as determined by a qualified wetland evaluator (cost Crescent Environmental PLLC 55 is the responsibility of proponent). This buffer distance will be measured outward from the delineated wetland boundary. Refer to the column in the tables with the word "delineation" in the heading. (iii) The Apparent Boundary Option. A prescriptive buffer distance based on the apparent location of the wetland boundary as proposed by the county's wetland specialist. In these cases the buffer will be the total distance calculated using the buffer distance as shown in the "delineation" column of the tables plus an additional 20 to 50 feet, depending upon wetland category (shown in the "nondelineation" column of the table). This calculated buffer distance will be measured outward from the apparent wetland boundary. (4) Drainage and Erosion Control. An applicant submitting a project application shall also submit, and have approved, a drainage and erosion control plan as specified in this chapter. The plan shall discuss, evaluate and recommend methods to minimize sedimentation of designated wetlands during and after construction. (5) Buffer Marking. Upon approval of the delineation report, the location of the outer extent of the wetland buffer shall be marked in the field as follows: (a) A permanent physical indicator along the upland boundary of the wetland buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. (b) During construction activities, buffer perimeters shall be marked with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every 100 feet, whichever is less. Signs shall remain in place prior to and during approved construction activities. The signs shall contain the following statement: "Wetland & Buffer — Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Native Vegetation." (c) In the case of short plat, long plat, binding site plan, and site plan approvals under this code, the applicant shall include on the face of any such instrument the boundary of the wetland and its buffer. (d) The applicant may also choose to dedicate the buffer through a conservation easement or deed restriction that shall be recorded with the Jefferson County auditor. Such easements or restrictions shall, however, use the forms approved by the prosecuting attorney. (6) Buffers — Standard Requirements. (a) The administrator shall have the authority to require buffers from the boundaries of all wetlands as established by this article, and in accordance with the following criteria. (i) Wetland buffer widths shall be measured along a horizontal line perpendicular to the wetland boundary as marked in the field during delineation if required, or based upon site investigation, aerial photographs, or LiDAR images. (ii) Functionally isolated buffer areas are those areas separated from a wetland that do not protect the wetland from adverse impacts. Buffers need not include areas that are functionally isolated Crescent Environmental PLLC 56 and physically disconnected from the wetland by a substantial developed surface such as a dike, building, parking lot, or road. In determining whether or not a buffer area is functionally isolated, the administrator shall take into consideration whether or not the isolated buffer area is used by wildlife to gain access to the wetland. In instances where substantial wildlife use is documented, the area shall be retained as buffer despite being otherwise isolated or disconnected from the wetland. (iii) When a buffer is on a slope steeper than 40 percent, and/or lacks adequately dense and diverse vegetation, the administrator may deny a proposal for buffer reduction or buffer averaging. (b) The prescribed buffer widths shall be established on the basis of the following factors: (i) The wetland's value and sensitivity to disturbance, based on its category (I, II, III, IV) as determined by the total score on the rating form for the wetland rating system; (ii) The expected level of impact of the proposed adjacent land use, as determined from Tables 18.22.330(1), (2), and (3). The administrator may determine, on the basis of detailed information from the applicant about the site conditions, scope, and intensity of the proposed development, that the proposed land use will have a lesser level of impact on the wetland than indicated by similar land uses on the list. Table 18.22.330(1) Crescent Environmental PLLC 57 1. WETLAND CATEGORIES, RATING SCORES AND BUFFER WIDTHS FOR LOW IMPACT LAND USES Low impact land uses shall include the following: • Private driveways serving no more than two residential parcels; • Unpaved trails (when not exempted by JCC 18.22.070); • Utility corridors (private or public) without a maintenance road; • Landscaping, lawns, gravel driveways, etc. 7. + An Additional 3. Wetland Distance Characteristics 6. Buffer Width from an 2. Wetland Category 4. • Habitat (H) with an Identified Apparent 5. • Water Quality Wetland Boundary Wetland (WQ) (Delineated) Boundary (Not Delineated) IV [Total of scores less than 25 feet +20 feet 15 points] (Total of scores for all functions is less than 15 points) III [With H score 5 — 7 75 feet +30 feet points] (Total of scores for all functions 40 feet is 16 — 19 points) [Not meeting above characteristic] Crescent Environmental PLLC 58 Table 18.22.330(1) 1. WETLAND CATEGORIES, RATING SCORES AND BUFFER WIDTHS FOR LOW IMPACT LAND USES Low impact land uses shall include the following: • Private driveways serving no more than two residential parcels; • Unpaved trails (when not exempted by JCC 18.22.070); • Utility corridors (private or public) without a maintenance road; • Landscaping, lawns, gravel driveways, etc. 7. + An Additional 3. Wetland Distance Characteristics 6. Buffer Width from an 2. Wetland Category 4. • Habitat (H) with an Identified Apparent 5. • Water Quality Wetland Boundary Wetland (WQ) (Delineated) Boundary (Not Delineated) II [WQ score 8 — 9 points 50 feet +40 feet and H score less than 5 (Total of scores for all functions points] is 20 — 22 points or having "special [H score 8 — 9 points] 150 feet characteristics" identified in the rating form) [H score 5 — 7 points] 75 feet [Estuarine] 75 feet [Interdunal] 75 feet [Not meeting above 50 feet characteristics] Crescent Environmental PLLC 59 Table 18.22.330(l) 1. WETLAND CATEGORIES, RATING SCORES AND BUFFER WIDTHS FOR LOW IMPACT LAND USES Low impact land uses shall include the following: • Private driveways serving no more than two residential parcels; ■ Unpaved trails (when not exempted by JCC 18.22.070 ; • Utility corridors (private or public) without a maintenance road; • Landscaping, lawns, gravel driveways, etc. 2. Wetland Category 3. Wetland Characteristics 4. • Habitat (H) 5. • Water Quality (WQ) 6. Buffer Width with an Identified Wetland Boundary (Delineated) 7. + An Additional Distance from an Apparent Wetland Boundary (Not Delineated) I [WQ score 8 — 9 points 50 feet +50 feet and H score less than 5 (Total of scores for all functions points] is more than 23 points or having "special characteristics" [H score 8 — 9 points] 150 feet identified in the rating form) [H score 5 — 7 points] 75 feet [Coastal Lagoon] 100 feet [Estuarine] 100 feet [Wetlands with High 125 feet Conservation Value] 125 feet [Bog] Buffer width based on [Forested] score for H functions or WQ functions 50 feet 60 Crescent Environmental PLLC Table 18.22.330(1) 1. WETLAND CATEGORIES, RATING SCORES AND BUFFER WIDTHS FOR LOW IMPACT LAND USES Low impact land uses shall include the following: • Private driveways serving no more than two residential parcels; • Unpaved trails (when not exempted by JCC 18.22.070); • Utility corridors (private or public) without a maintenance road; • Landscaping, lawns, gravel driveways, etc. 7. + An Additional 3. Wetland Distance Characteristics 6. Buffer Width from an 2. Wetland Category 4. • Habitat (H) with an Identified Apparent 5. • Water Quality Wetland Boundary Wetland (WQ) (Delineated) Boundary (Not Delineated) [Not meeting above characteristics] Note: Wetlands shall be classified using the 2004 Washington State Department of Ecology's Wetland Rating System for Western Washington (Ecology Publication No. 04-06-025), the 2014 Washington State Department of Ecology's Update (Publication No. 14-06-019), or as amended. Table 18.22.330(2) 61 Crescent Environmental PLLC & WETLAND CATEGORIES, RATING SCORES AND BUFFER WIDTHS FOR MODERATE IMPACT LAND USES Moderate impact land uses shall include the following: - Single-family residential use on parcels of one acre or larger; - Private roads or driveways serving three or more residential parcels; • Paved trails; - Passive recreation areas; ■ Utility corridors (private or public) with a maintenance road; - Class IV -General forest conversions, including conversion option harvest plans. 14. + An Additional 10. Wetland Distance Characteristics: 13. Buffer Width from an 9. Wetland Category 11. - Habitat (H) With an Identified Apparent 12. - Water Wetland Boundary Wetland Quality (WQ) (Delineated) Boundary (Not Delineated) IV [Total of scores less 40 feet +20 feet than 15 points] (Total of scores for all functions is less than 15 points) III [With H score 5 — 7 110 feet +30 feet points] (Total of scores for all functions is 60 feet 16 — 19 points) [Not meeting above characteristic] 62 Crescent Environmental PLLC Table 18.22.330(1) 1. WETLAND CATEGORIES, RATING SCORES AND BUFFER WIDTHS FOR LOW IMPACT LAND USES Low impact land uses shall include the following: e Private driveways serving no more than two residential parcels; • Unpaved trails (when not exempted by JCC 18.22.070); • Utility corridors (private or public) without a maintenance road; ■ Landscaping, lawns, gravel driveways, etc. 7. + An Additional 3. Wetland Distance Characteristics 6. Buffer Width from an 2. Wetland Category 4. • Habitat (H) With an Identified Apparent 5. • Water Quality Wetland Boundary Wetland (WQ) (Delineated) Boundary (Not Delineated) II [WQ score 8 — 9 points I75 feet +40 feet and H score less than 5 (Total of scores for all functions is points] 20 — 22 points or having "special characteristics" identified in the [H score 8 — 9 points] I225 feet rating form) [H score 5 — 7 points] 110 feet [Estuarine] 110 feet [Interdunal] 110 feet [Not meeting above 175 feet characteristics] 63 Crescent Environmental PLLC 'fable 18.22.330(1) 1. WETLAND CATEGORIES, RATING SCORES AND BUFFER WIDTHS FOR LOW IMPACT LAND USES Low impact land uses shall include the following: • Private driveways serving no more than two residential parcels; • Unpaved trails (when not exempted by JCC 18.22.070); • Utility corridors (private or public) without a maintenance road; • Landscaping, lawns, gravel driveways, etc. 2. Wetland Category 3. Wetland Characteristics 4. • Habitat (H) 5. • Water Quality (WQ) 6. Buffer Width With an Identified Wetland Boundary (Delineated) 7. + An Additional Distance from an Apparent Wetland Boundary (Not Delineated) 1 [WQ score 8 — 9 points 75 feet +50 feet and H score less than 5 (Total of scores for all functions is points] more than 23 points or having "special characteristics" identified [H score 8 — 9 points] 225 feet in the rating form) [H score 5 — 7 points] 110 feet [Coastal Lagoon] 150 feet [Estuarine] 150 feet [Wetlands with High 190 feet Conservation Value] 190 feet [Bog] Buffer width based on [Forested] score for H functions or WQ functions 75 feet Crescent Environmental PLLC 64 Table 18.22.330(1) 1. WETLAND CATEGORIES, RATING SCORES AND BUFFER WIDTHS FOR LOW IMPACT LAND USES Low impact land uses shall include the following: • Private driveways serving no more than two residential parcels; • Unpaved trails (when not exempted by JCC 18.22.070); • Utility corridors (private or public) without a maintenance road; • Landscaping, lawns, gravel driveways, etc. 7. + An Additional 3. Wetland Distance Characteristics 6. Buffer Width from an 2. Wetland Category 4. • Habitat (H) with an Identified Apparent 5. • Water Quality Wetland Boundary Wetland (WQ) (Delineated) Boundary (Not Delineated) [Not meeting above characteristics] Note: Wetlands shall be classified using the 2004 Washington State Department of Ecology's Wetland Rating System for Western Washington (Ecology Publication No. 04-06-025), the 2014 Washington State Department of Ecology's Update (Publication No. 14-06-019), or as amended. Table 18.22.330(3) 65 Crescent Environmental PLLC 15. WETLAND CATEGORIES, RATING SCORES AND BUFFER WIDTHS FOR HIGH IMPACT LAND USES High impact land uses shall include the following: • Single-family residential use on parcels smaller than one acre; • Commercial, multifamily, industrial and institutional uses; • Public roads. 21. + An Additional 17. Wetland Distance Characteristic: 20. Buffer Width from an 16. Wetland Category 18. • Habitat (H) with an Identified Apparent 19. • Water Wetland Boundary Wetland Quality (WQ) (Delineated) Boundary (Not Delineated) IV [Total of scores less 50 feet +20 feet than 15 points] (Total of scores for all functions is less than 15 points) III [With H score 5 — 7 150 feet +30 feet points] (Total of scores for all functions is 80 feet 16 — 19 points) [Not meeting above characteristic] II [WQ score 8 — 9 points 100 feet +40 feet and H score less than 5 (Total of scores for all functions is points] 20 — 22 points or having "special characteristics" identified in the [H score 8 — 9 points] 300 feet rating form) [H score 5 — 7 points] 150 feet [Estuarine] 150 feet [Interdunal] 150 feet [Not meeting above 100 feet characteristics] Crescent Environmental PLLC 66 Table 18.22.330(3) 15. WETLAND CATEGORIES, RATING SCORES AND BUFFER WIDTHS FOR HIGH IMPACT LAND USES High impact land uses shall include the following: • Single-family residential use on parcels smaller than one acre; - Commercial, multifamily, industrial and institutional uses; • Public roads. 21. + An Additional 17. Wetland Distance Characteristic: 20. Buffer Width from an 16. Wetland Category 18. • Habitat (H) with an Identified Apparent 19. • Water Wetland Boundary Wetland Quality (WQ) (Delineated) Boundary (Not Delineated) I [WQ score 8 — 9 points 100 feet +50 feet and H score less than 5 (Total of scores for all functions is points] more than 23 points or having "special characteristics" identified [H score 8 — 9 points] 300 feet in the rating form) [H score 5 — 7 points] 150 feet [Coastal Lagoon] 200 feet [Estuarine] 200 feet [Wetlands with High 250 feet Conservation Value] 67 Crescent Environmental PLLC Table 18.22.330(3) 15. WETLAND CATEGORIES, RATING SCORES AND BUFFER WIDTHS FOR HIGH IMPACT LAND USES High impact land uses shall include the following: • Single-family residential use on parcels smaller than one acre; - Commercial, multifamily, industrial and institutional uses; • Public roads. 21. + An Additional 17. Wetland Distance Characteristic: 20. Buffer Width from an 16. Wetland Category 18. • Habitat (H) with an Identified Apparent 19. • Water Wetland Boundary Wetland Quality (WQ) (Delineated) Boundary (Not Delineated) [Bog] 250 feet [Forested] Buffer width based on score for H functions or WQ functions 100 feet [Not meeting above characteristics] Note: Wetlands shall be classified using the 2004 Washington State Department of Ecology's Wetland Rating System for Western Washington (Ecology Publication No. 04-06-025), the 2014 Washington State Department of Ecology's Update (Publication No. 14-06-019, or as amended. (7) Reducing Buffer Widths. Upon submission of a special report by a qualified professional that 68 Crescent Environmental PLLC demonstrates a buffer reduction does not have any adverse impact on the existing functions and values of the wetland, the administrator shall have the authority to reduce the prescribed buffer widths, (within a defined area), listed in the section above; provided, that all of the following shall apply: (a) The buffer of a Category I or II wetland is not reduced to less than 75 percent of the required buffer or 50 feet, whichever is greater; (b) The buffer of a Category III or IV wetland is not reduced to less than 75 percent of the required buffer, or 25 feet, whichever is greater; (c) The applicant implements reasonable measures to reduce the adverse impacts of structures and appurtenances on the subject parcel as determined by the administrator; (d) Buffer area reduction shall be minimized to accommodate only those structures and appurtenances as approved by the administrator. (8) Averaging Buffer Widths. Upon submission of a special report by a qualified professional that demonstrates a buffer reduction does not have any adverse impact on the existing functions and values of the wetland, the administrator shall have the authority to average wetland buffer widths on a case -by -case basis; provided, that all of the following shall apply: (a) The buffer averaging does not have any adverse impact on the functions and values of the wetland; (b) The total area contained within the buffer after averaging is no less than that which would be contained within the prescribed buffer, and the buffer boundary remains more or less parallel to the wetland boundary in order to avoid the creation of panhandles; (c) The most sensitive, or highest value, areas of the wetland have the widest buffer dimensions, and the buffer boundary takes into account variations in slope, soils, or vegetation to optimize the overall effectiveness of the buffer; (d) The minimum buffer width is no less than 75 percent of the standard prescribed buffer width; (e) The buffer has not been reduced in accordance with subsection (5) of this section. Buffer averaging is not allowed if the width of the entire buffer has been reduced already. [Amended pursuant to Ecology's 2014 update to the 2004 Wetlands Rating System; Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.340 Noncompensatory enhancement. Noncompensatory enhancement projects are those which are conducted solely to increase the functions and values of an existing wetland and which are not required to be conducted pursuant to the mitigation requirements of JCC 18.22.330. There are two types of noncompensatory enhancement: 69 Crescent Environmental PLLC (1) Type 1 Noncompensatory Enhancement. Type 1 noncompensatory enhancement projects involve the filling, draining, or excavating of a regulated wetland. All applications for Type 1 noncompensatory enhancement projects shall be accompanied by an enhancement plan prepared in accordance with subsections (1)(a) and (1)(b) of this section, which demonstrates that the proposed activities will result in an increase in wetland functions and values. (a) The enhancement plan must be submitted for review, and approved by the administrator. (b) The enhancement plan must either be prepared by a qualified wetlands consultant or accepted in writing by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, or the Washington Department of Ecology. (2) Type 2 Noncompensatory Enhancement. Type 2 noncompensatory enhancement projects involve wetland alterations that do not include the filling, draining, or excavating of a regulated wetland. Such projects might involve the removal of nonnative plant species or the planting of native plant species. All applications for Type 2 noncompensatory enhancement projects shall be accompanied by an enhancement plan prepared in accordance with subsections (2)(a) through (2)(c) of this section, which demonstrates that the proposed activities will result in an increase in wetland functions and values. (a) The enhancement plan shall be submitted for review, and approved, by the administrator. (b) The enhancement plan must include a detailed description of the activity including the following information: (i) The goal of the enhancement project; (ii) What plants, if any, will be removed or planted; (iii) How the activity will be conducted, including the type(s) of tools or machinery to be used; and (iv) The qualifications of the individual who will be conducting the enhancement activity. (c) The enhancement plan must either be prepared by a qualified wetlands consultant or accepted in writing by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, or the Washington Department of Ecology. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.350 Mitigation. The overall goal of mitigation shall be no net loss of wetland function, value, and acreage. (1) Mitigation Sequence. Mitigation includes avoiding, minimizing, or compensating for adverse impacts to regulated wetlands or their buffers. When a proposed use or development activity poses potentially significant adverse impacts to a regulated wetland or its buffer, the preferred sequence of mitigation as defined below shall be followed unless the applicant demonstrates that ']O Crescent Environmental PLLC an overriding public benefit would warrant an exception to this preferred sequence. (a) Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of actions on that portion of the site which contains the regulated wetland or its buffer; (b) Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation; (c) Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment; (d) Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action; or (e) Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments. (2) Compensatory Mitigation — General Requirements. As a condition of any permit or other approval allowing alteration which results in the loss or degradation of regulated wetlands, or as an enforcement action pursuant to Chapter 18.50 JCC, compensatory mitigation shall be required to offset impacts resulting from the actions of the applicant or any code violator. (a) Except persons exempt under this article, any person who alters or proposes to alter regulated wetlands shall restore or create areas of wetland equivalent to or larger than those altered in order to compensate for wetland losses. The following table specifies the ratios that apply to creation or restoration that is in -kind, on -site, and is accomplished prior to or concurrently with alteration: Table 18.22.350 Required Replacement Ratios for Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Category Re- Rehabilitation Re- Re- Enhancement and Type establishment Onlyl establishment establishment Onlyl of or Creation or Creation or Creation Wetland (R/C) and (R/C) and Impacts Rehabilitation Enhancement (RH)1 (E)l All 1.5:1 : l 1:1 R/C and 1:1 1:1 R/C and 6:1 Category RH 2:1 E IV All 2:1 4:1 1:1 R/C and 2:1 1:1 R/C and 8:1 Category RH 4:1 E III ']1 Crescent Environmental PLLC Table 18.22.350 Required Replacement Ratios for Compensatory Wetland Mitieation Category Re- Rehabilitation Re- Re- Enhancement and Type establishment Onlyl establishment establishment Onlyl of or Creation or Creation or Creation Wetland (R/C) and (R/C) and Impacts Rehabilitation Enhancement (RH)1 (E)l Category II Case -by -case 4:1 Case -by -case Case -by -case Case -by -case Estuarine Rehabilitation of an estuarine wetland Category II 2:1 4:1 1:1 R/C and 2:1 Not considered Not considered Interdunal RH an option2 an option2 Compensation Compensation Compensation has to be has to be has interdunal interdunal to be interdunal wetland wetland wetland All Other 3:1 6:1 1:1 R/C and 4:1 1:1 R/C and 12:1 Category 11 RH 8:1 E Category I 6:1 12:1 1:1 R/C and 1:1 R/C and 24:1 Forested 10:1 RH 2O:1 E Category 1 4:1 8:1 1:1 R/C and 6:1 1:1 R/C and 16:1 Based on RH 12:1 E Score for Functions Category I Not considered 6:1 R/C not R/C not Case -by -case Natural possible3 considered considered Heritage Rehabilitation of possible3 possible3 Site a Natural Heritage site Category I Not considered 6:1 R/C not R/C not Case -by -case Coastal possible3 considered considered Lagoon Rehabilitation of possible3 possible3 a coastal lagoon Category I Not considered 6:1 R/C not R/C not Case -by -case Bog possible3 considered considered Rehabilitation of possible3 possible3 a bog %2 Crescent Environmental PLLC Table 18.22.350 Required Replacement Ratios for Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Category Re- Rehabilitation Re- Re- Enhancement and Type establishment Onlyl establishment establishment Onlyl of or Creation or Creation or Creation Wetland (R/C) and (R/C) and Impacts Rehabilitation Enhancement (RH)1 (E)l Category I Case -by -case 6:1 Case -by -case Case -by -case Case -by -case Estuarine Rehabilitation of an estuarine wetland 1 These ratios are based on the assumption that the rehabilitation or enhancement actions implemented represent the average degree of improvement possible for the site. Proposals to implement more effective rehabilitation or enhancement actions may result in a lower ratio, while less effective actions may result in higher ratio. The distinction between rehabilitation and enhancement is not clear-cut. Instead, rehabilitation and enhancement actions span a continuum. Proposals that fall within the gray area between rehabilitation and enhancement will result in a ratio that lies between the ratios for rehabilitation and the ratios for enhancement. 2 Due to the dynamic nature of interdunal systems, enhancement is not considered an ecologically appropriate action. 3 Natural heritage sites, coastal lagoons, and bogs are considered irreplaceable wetlands because they perform some functions that cannot be replaced through compensatory mitigation. Impacts to such wetlands would therefore result in a net loss of some functions no matter what kind of compensation is proposed. (b) Compensation must be completed prior to wetland destruction, where possible. (c) Compensatory mitigation must follow an approved compensatory mitigation plan pursuant to this article, with the replacement ratios as specified above. (d) Compensatory mitigation must be conducted on property that will be protected and managed to avoid further development or degradation. The applicant or code violator must provide for long-term preservation of the compensation area. (e) The applicant shall demonstrate sufficient scientific expertise, supervisory capability, and financial resources, including bonding, to carry out the project. The applicant must demonstrate the capability for monitoring the site and making corrections if the project fails to meet projected goals. Crescent Environmental PLLC 73 (f) Compensatory mitigation must monitor the impact and take appropriate corrective measures. (3) Compensatory Mitigation — Type, Location, and Timing. (a) Priority will be given to in -kind, on -site compensation if feasible and if the wetland to be lost has a moderate to high functional value. (b) When the wetland to be impacted is of a limited functional value and is degraded, compensation may be of the wetland community type most likely to succeed with the highest functional value possible. (c) Out -of -kind compensation may be allowed when out -of -kind replacement will best meet identified goals (for example, replacement of historically diminished wetland types). Where out - of -kind replacement is accepted, greater acreage replacement ratios may be required to compensate for lost functional values. (d) Off -site compensation can be allowed only if: (i) On -site compensation is not feasible due to hydrology, soils, waves, or other factors; (ii) On -site compensation is not practical due to probable adverse impacts from surrounding land uses; (iii) Potential functional values at the site of the proposed restoration are significantly greater than the lost wetland functional values; or (iv) Off -site compensation will be conducted in accordance with subsection (4) of this section (Cooperative Compensation Projects). (e) Except in the case of cooperative compensation projects, off -site compensation must occur within the same watershed where the wetland loss occurs; provided, that Category IV wetlands may be replaced outside of the watershed if there is no reasonable technical alternative. The stormwater storage function provided by Category fV wetlands must be provided for within the design of the development project. (f) Except in the case of cooperative compensation projects, in selecting compensation sites applicants must pursue locations in the following order of preference: (i) Filled, drained, or cleared sites which were formerly wetlands and where appropriate hydrology exists; and (ii) Upland sites, adjacent to wetlands, if the upland is significantly disturbed and does not contain a mature forested or shrub community of native species, and where the appropriate natural hydrology exists. (g) Construction of compensation projects must be timed to reduce impacts to existing wildlife Crescent Environmental PLLC 74 and flora. Construction must be timed to assure that grading and soil movement occurs during the dry season. Planting of vegetation must be specifically timed to the needs of the target species. (h) A mitigation plan shall include a monitoring plan. The duration, frequency and methods of monitoring depend on a project's goals, objectives, and performance standards. In general, monitoring is required for at least five years. If a scrub -shrub or forested vegetative community is proposed, monitoring may be required for 10 years or more. Monitoring may be extended if interim performance standards are not met. (4) Cooperative Compensation Projects. The county may encourage, facilitate, and approve cooperative projects where one or more applicants, or an organization with demonstrated capability, may undertake a compensation project if it is demonstrated that: (a) Creation of one or several larger wetlands may be preferable to many small wetlands; (b) The group demonstrates the organizational and fiscal capability to act cooperatively; (c) The group demonstrates that long-term management of the compensation area can and will be provided; and (d) There is a clear potential for success of the proposed compensation at the identified compensation site. Conducting compensation as part of a cooperative process does not reduce or eliminate the required replacement ratios outlined in this article. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] Article VIII. Special Reports 18.22.360 General requirements. (1) The administrator may require a special report or reports when critical areas are impacted. (2) Special reports for critical areas shall include a scale map of the development proposal site and a written report. (3) The special report shall identify and characterize any critical area as a part of the larger development proposal site, assess impacts of the development proposal on any critical area on or adjacent to the development proposal site, and assess the impacts of any alteration proposed for a critical area. (4) The special report shall propose adequate protection mechanisms that may include mitigation, maintenance and monitoring plans, and performance surety. (5) Special reports shall include documentation certifying the qualifications of the preparer. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] Crescent Environmental PLLC 75 18.22.370 Waivers. The administrator may waive the requirement for a special report when an applicant demonstrates all of the following: (1) The proposal involved will not affect the critical area in a manner contrary to the goals, purposes and objectives of this code. (2) The minimum protection standards required by this chapter are satisfied. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.380 Retaining consultants. Jefferson County may retain consultants to assist in the review of special reports outside the range of staff expertise. The applicant shall pay for the costs of retaining said consultants. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] 18.22.390 Acceptance of special reports. (1) The administrator shall verify the accuracy and sufficiency of all special reports within 42 calendar days of their submission. (2) If the administrator finds that a special report does not accurately reflect site conditions, or does not incorporate appropriate protections mechanisms, the administrator shall cite evidence (e.g., soil samples, well log data, etc.) that demonstrates where the special report is insufficient or in error. The applicant may then either revise the special report and submit another special report, or appeal the administrative determination pursuant to this code. [Ord. 3-08 § I] 18.22.450 Wetland delineation report. (1) General. This report shall be required when a proposed development encroaches upon a designated wetland or its buffer, and shall be used to identify the boundaries and classification of the designated wetland. (2) Qualifications of the Preparer. Wetland delineation reports shall be prepared by a biologist with wetlands expertise, a professional wetland scientist certified by the Society of Wetland Scientists. (3) Information Requirements. (a) A map(s) prepared at an easily readable scale, including the following information: (i) Wetland boundaries; (ii) Sample site and sample transects; Crescent Environmental PLLC 76 (iii) Boundaries of forested areas; and (iv) Boundaries of wetland classes if multiple classes exist. (b) A legend that includes the following information: (i) A complete and accurate legal description as prescribed by the triggering application form (the description shall include the total acreage of the parcel); (ii) Title, scale and north arrows; (iii) Date, including revision dates, if applicable; and (iv) Certificates by a professional biologist as appropriate. (c) A report that contains the following information: (i) A discussion of the delineation methods and results, with special emphasis on technique used from the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual, March 1997, or as amended hereafter; (ii) A description of relevant site information acquired from the National Wetland Inventory maps and the Soil Survey for Jefferson County; (iii) The acreage of each wetland on the site, based on the survey, if the acreage will impact the buffer size determination or the project design; (iv) All completed field data sheets numbered to correspond to each sample site; (v) Project cross -sections, both before and after completion, in relation to the surface elevation of the wetland must be indicated for proposed activities that involve cutting or filling operations within the wetland or its proposed buffer; (vi) Classification of the wetland in accordance with the standards adopted in this chapter and a detailed written analysis of the existing regulated wetland including: vegetation communities classified per the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Classification of Deepwater Habitats (1979); species composition of vegetation communities, including presence and percent cover; existing soils; and existing hydrologic conditions including inflow/outflow, source of water within the system, relative water quality, and seasonal changes in hydrology, if applicable; (vii) A detailed analysis of wildlife species use of the wetland and its buffer; (viii) A detailed analysis of the existing wetland buffer including species composition and percent coverage, whether the buffer is disturbed or not, and the functional value of the buffer in relation to the regulated wetland; Crescent Environmental PLLC 77 (ix) If the development activity would eliminate all or part of a regulated wetland then a detailed compensatory mitigation plan as outlined in subsection (4) of this section must be provided. (4) Mitigation Plan Contents. All wetland restoration, creation, and enhancement projects required by this code, either as a condition of project approval or as the result of an enforcement action, shall follow a mitigation plan prepared by a qualified specialist as defined herein and conducted in accordance with the requirements described in this code. The applicant or violator must receive written approval of the mitigation plan by the administrator prior to commencement of any wetland restoration, creation, or enhancement activity. [Ord. 3-08 § 1] Crescent Environmental PLLC %8