Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Wetland Delineation 002331012
Kroh Wetland Delineation Report September 27th, 2019 Prepared for: Alex Kroh and Petar Temunovic Sequim, Washington 98368 Regarding: Parcel: 002331012 Table of Contents I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1 II. Project Site Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................. 1 III. Project Site Information .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 National Wetlands Inventory Query ....................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Natural Resources Conservation Services Soil Query ............................................................................ 1 IV. Wetland Assessment Methods ................................................................................................................ 2 V. Wetland Delineation ................................................................................................................................ 3 1.0 Vegetation ............................................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Soils ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 3.0 Hydrology ............................................................................................................................................... 5 VI. Wetland Rating ....................................................................................................................................... 5 VII. Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 7 X. References ............................................................................................................................................... 8 Table of Tables Table 1. Soil Map Units ............................................................................................................................... 1 Table 2. Wetland – Sample Plot VSH-1: Vegetation ................................................................................... 4 Table 3. Upland – Sample Plot VSH-2: Vegetation ..................................................................................... 4 Table 4. Wetland – Sample Plot VSH-1 ....................................................................................................... 5 Table 5. Upland – Sample Plot VSH-2 ........................................................................................................ 5 Table of Figures Figure 1. Vicinity Map Figure 2. Wetland Delineation – Results Map Figure 3. National Wetland Inventory Map Figure 4. Jefferson County Critical Areas – DNR Streams and Wetlands Figure 5. NRCS Soils Query Figure 6. Jefferson County FEMA Flood Zones Figure 7. Jefferson County Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas Figure 8. Jefferson County Seismic Hazardous Areas Table of Appendices and Attachments Appendix A. Wetland Determination Forms Appendix B. Wetland Rating Form Attachment 1. Cowardin Plant Class Map Attachment 2. Hydroperiod Map Attachment 3. 1 km Polygon Land Use Map Attachment 4. Water Quality Atlas Attachment 5. FEMA Flood Zone Attachment 6. WDFW PHS Report Attachment 7. Wetland of High Conservation Value Appendix C. Photo Documentation Marine Surveys & Assessments Kroh Wetland Delineation Report 1 I. Introduction Marine Surveys & Assessments (MSA) was contracted by the client, Alex Kroh, to complete a wetland delineation at parcel #002331012 (16.29-acres), which is currently owned by Petar Temunovic. The project site is in Sequim, Washington 98368 in the northeast 1/4 of Section 33, Township 30N, Range 02W (Figure 1). The presence of a slope wetland was confirmed, delineated, and mapped. The wetlands are within Jefferson County, and as such were rated and assigned a buffer as specified by Jefferson County Municipal Code (JCMC). A category IV slope wetland, with moderate impact land use, was assigned a 40-foot buffer according to specifications in JCMC Table 18.22.330(2). A building setback line of five feet was also applied from the edge of the buffer area (18.22.270(5)(ii)) (Figure 2). This report follows criteria required in JCMC, Chapter 18.22.450 – Wetland Delineation Report. Field work for the wetland delineation was completed on September 10th, 2019, with GIS mapping and subsequent report writing completed between June and July 2019. Conditions at the project site were cloudy/overcast (~68° F) with a light breeze. The time of year and recent precipitation history were considered in assessing the extent of the suspect wetlands presumed to exist on site: heavy rain, over the course of a few days, was observed prior to the site visit (Appendix A). II. Project Site Existing Conditions Parcel 002331012 is predominantly deforested within the interior of the project site, with scattered forest and sapling/shrub habitat along the perimeter. Access to the project site is along the northeast boundary adjacent to Old Gardiner Road. Highway 101 borders the south boundary of the project (Figure 1). The delineated wetland has a hydrological connection with a wetland south of Highway 101 through a culvert (Figure 2). A previous wetland delineation also documented a wetland at the southwest portion of the project site (Wiltermood Associates, 2005; Figure 3). According to the Jefferson County Public Land Records map, a wetland was present in a larger area in the southwest portion of the project site, compared to the MSA wetland delineation (Figure 4). Three soil map units were identified throughout the project site (Figure 5). III. Project Site Information 1.0 National Wetlands Inventory Query The United States Fish and Wildlife National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map shows no mapped wetland types within ~0.25 miles from the project site (Figure 5). The NWI map documents were prepared primarily by stereoscopic analysis of high altitude aerial photographs taken in 1980 and 1981. Wetlands were identified on the photographs based on vegetation, visible hydrology, and geography. The aerial photographs typically reflected conditions during a specific year and season when they were taken. Some small wetlands and those obscured by dense forest cover may not be included on the map. In addition, there is a margin of error inherent in the use of aerial photographs. 2.0 Natural Resources Conservation Services Soil Query Table 1. Soil Map Units Soil Map Code Soil Name Percent *Bm Belfast silty clay loam, wet variant 18.0 CmC Clallam gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes 2.5 TuC Tukey gravelly loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes 79.5 (Approximately 15.9 acres; Parcel 002331012) *Soil map unit sampled during wetland delineation Marine Surveys & Assessments Kroh Wetland Delineation Report 2 Belfast silty clay loam, wet variant, occurs on flood plains of alluvium (30 to 660 feet elevation) with 50 to 70 inches of mean annual precipitation and 50° F annual air temperature. Typical profile for the Belmast map unit is consistently silt clay loam between 0 to 9 inches (H1), loam between 9 to 20 inches (H2), and stratified gravelly fine sandy loam to clay loam between 20 to 60 inches (H3). The map unit is somewhat poorly drained with depth to the most restrictive layer at more than 80 inches, moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr) capacity to the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat), and a depth of water table between 6 to 12 inches. Occasional flooding and no frequency of ponding was recorded. The soil is rated as hydric (Figure 6). IV. Wetland Assessment Methods The field delineation followed the methodology outlined in the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (effective January 1987): Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region 9 (Version 2.0; USACE, updated May 2010). This is the standard manual, used in determining wetland areas when applying state and local government regulations under the Shoreline Management Act and the Growth Management Act in Washington State. Preliminary information was gathered on the project site prior to the field review, rating, and delineation. General information sources included: • 1974 National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps, United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS; March 12, 2019) • Web Soil Survey: National Cooperative Soil Survey. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS; April 4, 2019) • 2016 Washington Department of Ecology Water Quality Atlas (WDOE) • Chapter 18.22 Jefferson County Critical Areas Municipal Code [Ord. 3-08 § 1] • 2016 National Wetland Plant List (NWPL): Western Mountains, Valleys & Coast. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) • Pocket Guide to Hydric Soil Field Indicators Based on Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (Version 7.0; 2013) • Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), in cooperation with National Technical Committee of Hydric Soils (NTCHS) (Version 8.2, 2018) • 2014 Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington 2014 Update. (Hruby, T Washington State Department of Ecology) The field rating followed the methodology outlines in the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington (2014 Update) field manual, published by the State of Washington Department of Ecology. The specified buffers, identified in accordance with each individual wetland’s rating score, are specified in Jefferson County Critical Areas, Chapter 18.2.330(1)-(3), Table: Wetland Categories, Rating Scores and Buffer Widths… Specific field methodology used in determining the extent and location of wetland areas include: 1) As part of the initial project site reconnaissance, the site was walked to determine the general extent and location of potential wetland areas. 2) Wetland and upland sample plots were established in the identified potential wetland areas and in the adjacent upland areas (blue and white ribbon); and 3) The extent of the wetland was located and marked using a GPS unit (Garmin 64st). Marine Surveys & Assessments Kroh Wetland Delineation Report 3 V. Wetland Delineation A wetland delineation establishes the specific boundaries of a wetland for the purposes of federal, state, and local regulations. In determining physical parameters of each individual wetland, indicators of vegetation, soils, and hydrology are analyzed to assess critical areas. By defining the transition zone between scientifically established upland and wetland indicators, an established accurate boundary of the wetland can be identified between a pair of data points; one representing the upland and one representing the wetland. It is common for paired data points, when linked to vegetative indicators (such as an obvious transition line of upland grass into an emergent herbaceous community), to inform the identification of the wetland delineation. A delineation, often in conjunction with a subsequent rating, is a necessary procedural step in obtaining information which will inform subsequent construction. A wetland delineation was conducted to obtain accurate wetland boundaries of a gradually sloped wetland at the southwest area of the project site. A moderate impact land use, according to Jefferson County municipal code (18.22.330(2); Wetland Categories, Rating Scores and Buffer Width for Moderate Impact Land Uses), was selected to represent the construction of a prospective single-family residence (Appendix A). The wetland was delineated using a pair of standard sampling points. The sampling points were designated Vegetation, Soils, and Hydrology (VSH). VSH-1 represented the wetland sampling point and VSH-2 represented the upland sampling point. Each data point consisted of a test pit dug to a standard depth of 18 inches to expose a representative soil profile, with the exception of a restrictive layer. Each data point was then assessed for the presence of three wetland indicators: hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. Following the successful location of paired data points, the wetland boundary was marked by a handheld GPS (Garmin 64st). The test pits were also geo-located by GPS latitude and longitude (Figure 2). 1.0 Vegetation To distinguish the types of plants that grow in different hydrologic regimes, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service incorporated a system of wetland plant indicator status to classify individual plant species. The wetland indicator status of a species is based on the individual species occurrence in wetlands in 13 separate regions within the United States. A plant indicator status is applied to the species, although individual variations exist within the species. Plant species were identified and given an indicator status according to the National Wetland Plant List: Western Mountains, Valleys & Coast. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (NWPL, 2016). Indicator categories are as follows: OBL – Obligate Wetland – Almost always occurs in wetlands under natural conditions. FACW – Facultative Wetland – Usually occurs in wetlands, occasionally found in uplands. FAC – Facultative – Equally likely to occur in wetlands or non-wetlands FACU – Facultative Upland – Usually occurs in non-wetlands, occasionally found in wetlands. UPL – Obligate Upland – Almost always occurs in uplands under natural conditions. To meet the qualification as a site dominated by hydrophytic vegetation, wetland plant species must show at least one of five hydrophytic vegetation indicators (Appendix A). All test plots that qualified as wet sites did so by fulfilling one of the following wetland vegetation indicators: Dominance Test (>50% hydric vegetation). Vegetation throughout the perimeter of the wetland was dominated by Obligate, Facultative Wet, Facultative, and Facultative species. The tree stratum in the sampling plot included Western red cedar (Thuja plicata), Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), and traces of Big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum). The sapling/shrub/stratum included Salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis) and Big leaf maple. Herbaceous vegetation included Water parsley (Oenanthe sarmentosa), Lady fern (Athyrium felix-femina), and Giant horsetail (Equisetum telmateia), and Scirpus sp. Twenty-five percent of the sampling plot included bare ground (Table 2 and Appendix A). Marine Surveys & Assessments Kroh Wetland Delineation Report 4 Table 2. Wetland – Sample Plot VSH-1: Vegetation Stratum Common Name Latin Name Status Absolute % Cover Tree Western red cedar Thuja plicata FAC 30 Tree Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii FACU 5 Tree Big leaf maple Acer macrophyllum FACU 2 Sapling/Shrub Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis FAC 10 Sapling/Shrub Big leaf maple Acer macrophyllum FACU 10 Herb Water parsley Oenanthe sarmentosa OBL 20 Herb Lady fern Athyrium felix-femina FAC 15 Herb Giant horsetail Equisetum telmateia FACW 5 Herb - Scirpus sp. OBL 5 The upland plot was located upslope on the edge of a formerly clear-cut area. The tree stratum included Big leaf maple, Western red cedar, Red alder (Alnus rubra), and Douglas fir. The sapling/shrub/stratum included Salmonberry, Big leaf maple, and Ocean spray (Holodiscus discolor). Herbaceous vegetation included Swordfern (Polystichum munitum) and Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus). No bare ground was recorded within the sampling plot (Table 3 and Appendix A). Table 3. Upland – Sample Plot VSH-2: Vegetation Stratum Common Name Latin Name Status Absolute % Cover Tree Big leaf maple Acer macrophyllum FACU 20 Tree Western red cedar Thuja plicata FAC 20 Tree Red alder Alnus rubra FAC 15 Tree Douglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii FACU 10 Sapling/Shrub Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis FAC 20 Sapling/Shrub Big leaf maple Acer macrophyllum FACU 20 Sapling/Shrub Ocean spray Holodiscus discolor FACU 5 Herb Swordfern Polystichum munitum FACU 15 Herb Himalayan blackberry Rubus armeniacus FAC 5 2.0 Soils Hydric soils form under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper soil horizon (NRCS). Most hydric soils exhibit characteristic morphologies that result from repeated periods of inundation or saturation that last more than a few days. Saturation or inundation, when combined with microbial activity in the soil, causes a depletion of oxygen. This anaerobic state promotes certain biogeochemical processes, such as the accumulation of organic matter, the accumulation or reduction of iron, and other reducible elements. These processes in turn create regionally specific, visible indicators, which help identify and delineate hydric soils in a field setting. These indicators are not intended to replace or modify the requirements contained in the definition of a hydric soil; they are dynamic, and open to a degree of human interpretation. Some hydric soils lack any currently listed and accepted indicators; therefore, the lack of any listed indicator does not prevent classification of a soil as hydric. However, such soils and their specific morphologies, are included and specified in the necessary field guides. The wetland hydric soils were identified using the Munsell Soil Color Book, a standard reference manual prepared by the Munsell Color Company and used by the United States Department of Agriculture. The hydric soil indicator for wetland sample plot VSH-1 was: Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11). Large rock formed a restrictive layer at 13 inches and made analyzing a complete 18-inch sample difficult (Table 4 and Appendix A). Marine Surveys & Assessments Kroh Wetland Delineation Report 5 Table 4. Wetland – Sample Plot VSH-1 Depth (inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture Color % Color % Type1 Loc2 0-6” 10YR2/1 100% - - - - Sandy clay loam 6-13” 10YR4/2 100% - - - - Sandy clay loam 1Type: C=Concentration, RM=Reduced Matrix, D=Depletion, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix No hydric soil indicators were demonstrated for upland sample plot VSH-2. The sampling location is adjacent to the wetland boundary and included duff on the surface with dry, crumbly, root filled layer beneath (Table 5 and Appendix A). Table 5. Upland – Sample Plot VSH-2 Depth (inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture Color % Color % Type1 Loc2 - - - - - - - - 1Type: C=Concentration, RM=Reduced Matrix, D=Depletion, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix 3.0 Hydrology Hydrologic conditions result from the interactions between meteorological, surface and ground water, as well as physical and biological factors that influence the flow, quality, or timing of water. Therefore, the determination of the presence of hydrologic conditions focuses on the corresponding presence of factors that most directly influence the persistence of water in a specific area. Similar to the indicators used in hydric soils, and because watersheds vary tremendously across the country, regional hydrologic indicators are used to identify wetlands in the field more easily. Wetland sample plot VSH-1 demonstrated Saturation (A3) and Geomorphic Position (D2). Days leading up to sampling included heavy rainfall. Upland sample plots VSH-2 did not demonstrate wetland hydrologic indicators (Appendix A). VI. Wetland Rating The intent of a rating is to provide a basis for protecting and managing wetlands; this is accomplished assessing a wetland’s valued functions and resources: ecological, economic, or aesthetic. In the process of a rating, a wetland is placed in a Hydrogeomorphic (HGM) Class, or a classification of wetland type, and a Category, or a numerically scored quantification of its functions and specific attributes such as rarity, sensitivity to disturbance, and the functions they provide. Based upon this score, the wetland is placed in Category I through Category IV; the former is a wetland of greatest value, based upon the rating rubric’s characterization of its inherent value, while the latter is a wetland of least value. A specific buffer, identified in accordance with each individual wetland’s rating score, is then recommended, using standardized and established guidelines. While all wetlands provide some functions and resources that are valued, be they ecological or aesthetic, they also vary widely. Consequently, the recommended buffer identified in accordance with each individual wetland’s rating score reflects that particular wetland and its specific qualities. In accordance with the Washington Department of Ecology Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update, rating categories are divided into four grades, in order of descending buffer size: Category I with total scores of 23-27; Category II with total scores of 20-22; Category III with total scores of 16-19; Category IV with total scores of 9-15 (Appendix B). The category of wetland based on functions is rated by the following parameters: Marine Surveys & Assessments Kroh Wetland Delineation Report 6 1) Water Quality Functions: a wetland’s potential to improve water quality a) Potential of the wetland to improve water quality of and surrounding the wetland. b) Potential of the wetland to support the water quality function of and surrounding the wetland. (This parameter regards the ability of the wetland to mitigate for and lessen the toxicity of potential pollutants on and surrounding the wetland). c) Potential of local water quality improvement provided by the wetland to benefit adjacent waters. 2) Hydrologic Functions: a wetland’s potential to improve hydrology a) Potential to reduce flooding and erosion b) Potential of wetland to support the hydrologic functions of the site (this parameter regards the ability of the wetland in reducing the toxicity of potential pollutants on-site and up-gradient of the wetland). c) Potential of wetland to help capture surface water that might otherwise flow down- gradient into areas where flooding might occur. 3) Habitat Functions: a wetland's potential to provide important habitat/ecological value a) Potential of the wetland to provide habitat for natural living systems. b) Potential of the accessible and undisturbed habitat and land use intensity surrounding the wetland to support the habitat functions of the site. c) Value of wetland to society; degree to which it provides habitat for species valued in laws, regulation, or policy. Wetland: Slope, Category IV. Buffer for “Moderate Land Use Impact” (Single-family residences on parcels larger than one acre): 40 feet (Jefferson County municipal code 18.22.330(2)) The wetland was determined to fall into the HGM Class – Slope, Category IV, based on functions. According to the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington 2014 Update (Hruby 2014), “Slope wetlands occur on hill or valley slopes where groundwater surfaces and begins running along the surface, or immediately below the surface. Water in these wetlands flows only in one direction (down the slope) and the gradient is steep enough that the water is not impounded. The downhill side of the wetland is always the point of lowest elevation in the wetland.” The wetland scored a rating of four (Low, Medium, and Low) within the “Improving Water Quality” function, five (Medium, Medium, and Low) within the “Hydrologic” function, and five (Low, High, and Low) within the “Habitat” function section, for a combined score of 14. Chapter 18.22.300 of the Jefferson County municipal code states “Category IV wetlands less than one-tenth acre (4,356 square feet) shall be exempt from the requirements of this article.” The wetland is approximately 5,693 ft2 and does not meet the exemption. One Cowardin plant class was observed in the wetland and included a forested class (canopy, subcanopy, and herbaceous with >20% cover each). The wetland vegetation included dense, uncut herbaceous plants in more than half of the area and uncut rigid plant cover in more than 90% of the wetland (Appendix A and Attachment 1). The interior of the wetland is saturated only (Attachment 2). The area within a one- kilometer polygon of the project site consists predominantly of undisturbed or moderately to low intensity land uses, with high intensity land uses making up the remaining area (Attachment 3). No Category 5 – 303(d) listed waters or Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDLs) projects were recorded near the project site (Attachment 4). These criteria are associated with the HGM Classification of Wetlands in Western Washington. The wetland was considered a slope wetland (Wetland Rating Form - Appendix B). The project is outside of the FEMA 100-year flood zone (Attachment 5). Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Priority Habitat and Species (PHS) report did not identify listed species or habitat Marine Surveys & Assessments Kroh Wetland Delineation Report 7 (Attachment 6). No Wetlands of High Conservation Value (WHCV) were reported near the project site (Attachment 7). VII. Summary This wetland report documents the presence of a slope wetland on parcel 002331012 (Figure 2). The wetland was delineated, rated and mapped. A buffer was established according to specifications in the Jefferson County Critical Areas Municipal Code for a Category IV (40 foot buffer) wetlands, with medium level of impact from land use (18.22.330(2)). A building setback line of five feet was also applied from the edge of the buffer area (18.22.270(5)(ii)) (Figure 2). Impacts from any proposed construction of a single-family residence should avoid the wetlands and their associated buffers throughout development. Respectfully submitted, Marine Surveys and Assessments ______________________________ Paul Ruben WPIT Wetland Biologist ______________________________ Amy Leitman Senior Biologist, Owner Marine Surveys & Assessments Kroh Wetland Delineation Report 8 X. References Cowardin, LM., V. Carter, F.C. Golet and E.T. LaRoe, 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service document FWS/OBS-79/31. 84pp. Washington D.C. Jefferson County Municipal Code. Chapter 18.22 Critical Areas [Ord. 3-08 § 1] Hitchcock, L.C. and A. Cronquist, 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press. Hruby, T. (2014). Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington: 2014 Update. (Publication #14-06-029). Olympia, WA: Washington Department of Ecology Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X Munsell Soil Color Charts, 1998. GretagMacbeth. North Windsor, New York. National Cooperative Soil Survey. Official Established Series Description. 2000. National Wetlands Inventory (NWI). 2019. Wetlands Report. Available at: https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/mapper.html Pocket Guide to Hydric Soil Field Indicators Based on Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States v. 7.0 with Updates, Prepared by Wetland Training Institute, Inc., 2013 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (1987): Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region (Version 2.0), US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), May 2010. Speare-Cooke, S., 1997. A Field Guide to the Common Wetland Plants of Western Washington and Northwestern Oregon. Seattle Audubon Society. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area, Washington. December, 2013 US Fish and Wildlife Service. National Wetlands Inventory. 1978 US Fish and Wildlife Service. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. 1992 Figures Client: Alex Kroh Vicinity Map Figure Google. Imagery ©2019. Digital Globe U.S. Geological Survey Drawn: 9/25/2019 Drawn By: PJR Parcel No. 002331012 1NE 1/4 Section: 33 Township: 30N Range: 2W Discovery Bay, Washington 98368 Checked By: Parcel 002331012 Project Location Client: Alex Kroh Wetland Delineation Results Map Figure Google. Imagery ©2019. Digital Globe U.S. Geological Survey Drawn: 9/23/2019 Drawn By: PJR Parcel No. 002331012 2NE 1/4 Section: 33 Township: 30N Range: 2W Discovery Bay, Washington 98368 Checked By: Parcel 002331012 Cat. IV Slope Wetland Boundary (5693 sq ft) 40' Cat. IV Slope Wetland Buffer 5' Building Setback Soil Sample Locations Culverts Legend Figure 3. Wetland Delineation Results Map (2005) Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA,USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community, Jefferson County, WA., Pro-West &³These data are provided on an "AS-IS" basis, without warranty of any type, expressed or implied, including but not limited to any warranty as to their performance, merchantability, or fitness for any particular purpose.This map is not a substitute for accurate field surveys or for locating actual property lines and any adjacent features.Date: 9/18/20191:4,514 Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS Legend Parcels - Critical Areas Report DNR Streams Forest Practices Fish Habitat Non-fish Habitat Inventoried Shoreline Wetlands Tax Parcel Road Centerline Labels Road Centerlines County Boundary Figure 4. Jefferson County Public Land Records Map - Wetlands U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Standards and Support Team,wetlands_team@fws.gov Wetlands Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Estuarine and Marine Wetland Freshwater Emergent Wetland Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Freshwater Pond Lake Other Riverine September 18, 2019 0 0.15 0.30.075 mi 0 0.3 0.60.15 km 1:11,304 This page was produced by the NWI mapperNational Wetlands Inventory (NWI) This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site. Figure 5. NWI Map Soil Map—Jefferson County Area, Washington (Parcel 002331012) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/27/2019 Page 1 of 353218705321910532195053219905322030532207053221105322150532219053222305321870532191053219505321990532203053220705322110532215053221905322230504620504660504700504740504780504820504860504900 504620 504660 504700 504740 504780 504820 504860 504900 48° 3' 12'' N 122° 56' 17'' W48° 3' 12'' N122° 56' 2'' W48° 2' 59'' N 122° 56' 17'' W48° 2' 59'' N 122° 56' 2'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 10N WGS84 0 50 100 200 300 Feet 0 25 50 100 150 Meters Map Scale: 1:1,890 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Figure 6. NRCS Soil Query MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Jefferson County Area, Washington Survey Area Data: Version 18, Sep 16, 2019 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Apr 27, 2019—May 10, 2019 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Soil Map—Jefferson County Area, Washington (Parcel 002331012) Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/27/2019 Page 2 of 3 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Bm Belfast silty clay loam, wet variant 2.9 18.0% CmC Clallam gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes 0.4 2.5% TuC Tukey gravelly loam, 0 to 15 percent slopes 12.6 79.5% Totals for Area of Interest 15.9 100.0% Soil Map—Jefferson County Area, Washington Parcel 002331012 Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/27/2019 Page 3 of 3 Jefferson County Area, Washington Bm—Belfast silty clay loam, wet variant Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2gq2 Elevation: 30 to 660 feet Mean annual precipitation: 50 to 70 inches Mean annual air temperature: 50 degrees F Frost-free period: 170 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if drained Map Unit Composition Belfast variant, wet, and similar soils: 95 percent Minor components: 5 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Belfast Variant, Wet Setting Landform: Flood plains Parent material: Alluvium Typical profile H1 - 0 to 9 inches: silty clay loam H2 - 9 to 20 inches: loam H3 - 20 to 60 inches: stratified gravelly fine sandy loam to clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: 1 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Natural drainage class: Poorly drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table: About 6 to 12 inches Frequency of flooding: Occasional Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: High (about 10.3 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 5w Hydrologic Soil Group: C/D Forage suitability group: Wet Soils (G002XN102WA) Hydric soil rating: Yes Minor Components Belfast Percent of map unit: 5 percent Map Unit Description: Belfast silty clay loam, wet variant---Jefferson County Area, Washington Parcel 002331012 Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 9/27/2019 Page 1 of Hydric soil rating: No Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Jefferson County Area, Washington Survey Area Data: Version 18, Sep 16, 2019 JH!8_Zf!;\_]‘!\S!=[TV[RR_‘!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!LR‘aR_[!C\b[aNV[‘%!KNYYRf‘%!N[Q!;\N‘a!j!KR_‘V\[!+’)! WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region ! F_\WRPa(HVaR3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!;Vaf(;\b[af3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HNZ]YV[T!<NaR3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 8]]YVPN[a(Ed[R_3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HaNaR3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HNZ]YV[T!F\V[a3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A[cR‘aVTNa\_#‘$3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HRPaV\[%!I\d[‘UV]%!GN[TR3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BN[QS\_Z!#UVYY‘Y\]R%!aR__NPR%!RaP’$3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!B\PNY!_RYVRS!#P\[PNcR%!P\[cRe%![\[R$3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HY\]R!#"$3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HbO_RTV\[!#BGG$3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!BNa3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!B\[T3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<NabZ3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! H\VY!CN]!J[Va!DNZR3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!DLA!PYN‘‘VSVPNaV\[3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 8_R!PYVZNaVP!(!UfQ_\Y\TVP!P\[QVaV\[‘!\[!aUR!‘VaR!af]VPNY!S\_!aUV‘!aVZR!\S!fRN_7!!MR‘!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!D\!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!#AS![\%!Re]YNV[!V[!GRZN_X‘’$!! 8_R!KRTRaNaV\[!!!!!!!!!!!!%!H\VY!!!!!!!!!!!!!%!\_!@fQ_\Y\Tf!!!!!!!!!!!!!!‘VT[VSVPN[aYf!QV‘ab_ORQ7!!!!!!!!!!!!8_R!hD\_ZNY!;V_PbZ‘aN[PR‘i!]_R‘R[a7!!!MR‘!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!D\!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 8_R!KRTRaNaV\[!!!!!!!!!!!!%!H\VY!!!!!!!!!!!!!%!\_!@fQ_\Y\Tf!!!!!!!!!!!!!![Nab_NYYf!]_\OYRZNaVP7!!!!!!!!!!!!!#AS![RRQRQ%!Re]YNV[!N[f!N[‘dR_‘!V[!GRZN_X‘’$! SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. @fQ_\]UfaVP!KRTRaNaV\[!F_R‘R[a7! MR‘!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!D\!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! @fQ_VP!H\VY!F_R‘R[a7!! MR‘!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!D\!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LRaYN[Q!@fQ_\Y\Tf!F_R‘R[a7! MR‘!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!D\!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No GRZN_X‘3! ! VEGETATION – Use scientific names of plants. Dominance Test worksheet: DbZOR_!\S!<\ZV[N[a!H]RPVR‘!!! IUNa!8_R!E9B%!>8;L%!\_!>8;3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!#8$! I\aNY!DbZOR_!\S!<\ZV[N[a!!!! H]RPVR‘!8P_\‘‘!8YY!Ha_NaN3!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!#9$! FR_PR[a!\S!<\ZV[N[a!H]RPVR‘! IUNa!8_R!E9B%!>8;L%!\_!>8;3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!#8(9$! Prevalence Index worksheet: !!!!!!!I\aNY!"!;\cR_!\S3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!CbYaV]Yf!Of3!!!!!!!! E9B!‘]RPVR‘! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!e!*!5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >8;L!‘]RPVR‘! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!e!+!5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >8;!‘]RPVR‘! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!e!,!5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >8;J!‘]RPVR‘! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!e!-!5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! JFB!‘]RPVR‘! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!e!.!5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ;\YbZ[!I\aNY‘3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!#8$!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!#9$! !!!!!!!!!F_RcNYR[PR!A[QRe!!5!9(8!5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ! !!!!!!!*!&!GN]VQ!IR‘a!S\_!@fQ_\]UfaVP!KRTRaNaV\[! !!!!!!!+!&!<\ZV[N[PR!IR‘a!V‘!6.)"! !!!!!!!,!&!F_RcNYR[PR!A[QRe!V‘!",’)*! !!!!!!!-!&!C\_]U\Y\TVPNY!8QN]aNaV\[‘*!#F_\cVQR!‘b]]\_aV[T! !!!!!!!!!!!!QNaN!V[!GRZN_X‘!\_!\[!N!‘R]N_NaR!‘URRa$! !!!!!!!.!&!LRaYN[Q!D\[&KN‘PbYN_!FYN[a‘*! !!!!!!!F_\OYRZNaVP!@fQ_\]UfaVP!KRTRaNaV\[*!#=e]YNV[$! *A[QVPNa\_‘!\S!UfQ_VP!‘\VY!N[Q!dRaYN[Q!UfQ_\Y\Tf!Zb‘a! OR!]_R‘R[a%!b[YR‘‘!QV‘ab_ORQ!\_!]_\OYRZNaVP’! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!8O‘\YbaR!!!!<\ZV[N[a!!A[QVPNa\_! I_RR!Ha_NabZ!!!#FY\a!‘VgR3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!$!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!;\cR_!!!!H]RPVR‘7!!!!HaNab‘!!!! *’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ,’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!5!I\aNY!;\cR_! HN]YV[T(HU_bO!Ha_NabZ!!!#FY\a!‘VgR3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!$! *’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ,’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! .’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!5!I\aNY!;\cR_! @R_O!Ha_NabZ!!!#FY\a!‘VgR3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!$! *’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ,’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! .’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! /’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 0’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 2’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! *)’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! **’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!5!I\aNY!;\cR_! L\\Qf!KV[R!Ha_NabZ!!!#FY\a!‘VgR3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!$! *’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!5!I\aNY!;\cR_! "!9N_R!?_\b[Q!V[!@R_O!Ha_NabZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No GRZN_X‘3! Kroh/Temunovic Wetland (Parcel 002331012)Sequim/Jefferson County 9/10/19 Alex Kroh/Peter Temunovic WA VSH-1 Meg Amos Section 33,Township 30N,Range 2W Hillslope Concave 2% A (MLRA 2)48°02'02.78"N 122°56'12.51"W NAD_1983_102748 Belfast Silty Clay Loam (BM), wet variant None Site conditions were cloudy/overcast (~70 F). Many culverts were discovered to connect to the southern extent of the wetland. 30' Douglas Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) Big Leaf Maple (Acer macrophyllum) 30% 5% 2% 37% Yes No No FAC FACU FACU Western Red Cedar (Thuja plicata)4 5 5'80% Salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis)10% 20% Yes FAC 5' Water Parsley (Oenanthe sarmentosa) Lady Fern (Athyrium felixfemina) Giant Horsetail (Equisetum telmateia) Scirpus sp. 20% 15% 5% 5% 45% Yes Yes No No OBL FAC FACW OBL N/A N/A25% Canopy dominated by a mix of Western red cedar, Douglas fir,and Big leaf maple.Subcanopy consisted of scattered Salmonberry and Big leaf maple.Herbaceous Big Leaf Maple (Acer macrophyllum)10%Yes FACU Appendix A. Wetland Determination Forms JH!8_Zf!;\_]‘!\S!=[TV[RR_‘! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!LR‘aR_[!C\b[aNV[‘%!KNYYRf‘%!N[Q!;\N‘a!j!KR_‘V\[!+’)! SOIL! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HNZ]YV[T!F\V[a3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) !<R]aU!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!CNa_Ve!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!GRQ\e!>RNab_R‘!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !#V[PUR‘$!!!!!! !!!!!;\Y\_!#Z\V‘a$!!!!!!!!!!!!"!!!!!! !!!!!;\Y\_!#Z\V‘a$!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!!!!!!!!!If]R*!!!!!!!B\P+!!!!!!!!!!!IReab_R!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!GRZN_X‘!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! *If]R3!!;5;\[PR[a_NaV\[%!<5<R]YRaV\[%!GC5GRQbPRQ!CNa_Ve%!;H5;\cR_RQ!\_!;\NaRQ!HN[Q!?_NV[‘’!!!!!!!!!+B\PNaV\[3!!FB5F\_R!BV[V[T%!C5CNa_Ve’ Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:! !!!!!!!@V‘a\‘\Y!#8*$! !!!!!!!HN[Qf!GRQ\e!#H.$! !!!!!!!+!PZ!CbPX!#8*)$! !!!!!!!@V‘aVP!=]V]RQ\[!#8+$! !!!!!!!Ha_V]]RQ!CNa_Ve!#H/$! !!!!!!!GRQ!FN_R[a!CNaR_VNY!#I>+$! !!!!!!!9YNPX!@V‘aVP!#8,$! !!!!!!!B\NZf!CbPXf!CV[R_NY!#>*$!#except MLRA 1$! !!!!!!!KR_f!HUNYY\d!<N_X!Hb_SNPR!#I>*+$! !!!!!!!@fQ_\TR[!HbYSVQR!#8-$! !!!!!!!B\NZf!?YRfRQ!CNa_Ve!#>+$! !!!!!!!EaUR_!#=e]YNV[!V[!GRZN_X‘$! !!!!!!!<R]YRaRQ!9RY\d!<N_X!Hb_SNPR!#8**$! !!!!!!!<R]YRaRQ!CNa_Ve!#>,$! !!!!!!!IUVPX!<N_X!Hb_SNPR!#8*+$! !!!!!!!GRQ\e!<N_X!Hb_SNPR!#>/$!,A[QVPNa\_‘!\S!UfQ_\]UfaVP!cRTRaNaV\[!N[Q! !!!!!!!HN[Qf!CbPXf!CV[R_NY!#H*$!! !!!!!!!<R]YRaRQ!<N_X!Hb_SNPR!#>0$! !!!!!dRaYN[Q!UfQ_\Y\Tf!Zb‘a!OR!]_R‘R[a%! !!!!!!!HN[Qf!?YRfRQ!CNa_Ve!#H-$! !!!!!!!GRQ\e!<R]_R‘‘V\[‘!#>1$! !!!!!b[YR‘‘!QV‘ab_ORQ!\_!]_\OYRZNaVP’! Restrictive Layer (if present): !!!!!If]R3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!<R]aU!#V[PUR‘$3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! Hydric Soil Present? Yes No GRZN_X‘3! ! ! ! HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: ! F_VZN_f!A[QVPNa\_‘!#ZV[VZbZ!\S!\[R!_R^bV_RQ4!PURPX!NYY!aUNa!N]]Yf$!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HRP\[QN_f!A[QVPNa\_‘!#+!\_!Z\_R!_R^bV_RQ$! !!!!!!!Hb_SNPR!LNaR_!#8*$! !!!!!!!LNaR_&HaNV[RQ!BRNcR‘!#92$!#except! !!!!!!!LNaR_&HaNV[RQ!BRNcR‘!#92$!#MLRA 1, 2,! !!!!!!!@VTU!LNaR_!INOYR!#8+$! !!!!!!!!!!!!MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B)! !!!!!!!!!!! 4A, and 4B) !!!!!!!HNab_NaV\[!#8,$! !!!!!!!HNYa!;_b‘a!#9**$! !!!!!!!<_NV[NTR!FNaaR_[‘!#9*)$! !!!!!!!LNaR_!CN_X‘!#9*$!! !!!!!!!8^bNaVP!A[cR_aRO_NaR‘!#9*,$! !!!!!!!<_f&HRN‘\[!LNaR_!INOYR!#;+$! !!!!!!!HRQVZR[a!<R]\‘Va‘!#9+$!! !!!!!!!@fQ_\TR[!HbYSVQR!EQ\_!#;*$! !!!!!!!HNab_NaV\[!KV‘VOYR!\[!8R_VNY!AZNTR_f!#;2$! !!!!!!!<_VSa!<R]\‘Va‘!#9,$!! !!!!!!!EeVQVgRQ!GUVg\‘]UR_R‘!NY\[T!BVcV[T!G\\a‘!#;,$! !!!!!!!?R\Z\_]UVP!F\‘VaV\[!#<+$! !!!!!!!8YTNY!CNa!\_!;_b‘a!#9-$! !!!!!!!F_R‘R[PR!\S!GRQbPRQ!A_\[!#;-$! !!!!!!!HUNYY\d!8^bVaN_Q!#<,$! !!!!!!!A_\[!<R]\‘Va‘!#9.$! !!!!!!!GRPR[a!A_\[!GRQbPaV\[!V[!IVYYRQ!H\VY‘!#;/$! !!!!!!!>8;&DRba_NY!IR‘a!#<.$! !!!!!!!Hb_SNPR!H\VY!;_NPX‘!#9/$! !!!!!!!Hab[aRQ!\_!Ha_R‘‘RQ!FYN[a‘!#<*$!#LRR A$! !!!!!!!GNV‘RQ!8[a!C\b[Q‘!#</$!#LRR A$! !!!!!!!A[b[QNaV\[!KV‘VOYR!\[!8R_VNY!AZNTR_f!#90$! !!!!!!!EaUR_!#=e]YNV[!V[!GRZN_X‘$! !!!!!!!>_\‘a&@RNcR!@bZZ\PX‘!#<0$! !!!!!!!H]N_‘RYf!KRTRaNaRQ!;\[PNcR!Hb_SNPR!#91$! Field Observations: Hb_SNPR!LNaR_!F_R‘R[a7! MR‘!!!!!!!!!!!!!D\!!!!!!!!!!!!!<R]aU!#V[PUR‘$3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LNaR_!INOYR!F_R‘R[a7!! MR‘!!!!!!!!!!!!!D\!!!!!!!!!!!!!<R]aU!#V[PUR‘$3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HNab_NaV\[!F_R‘R[a7!!!! MR‘!!!!!!!!!!!!!D\!!!!!!!!!!!!!<R]aU!#V[PUR‘$3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! #V[PYbQR‘!PN]VYYN_f!S_V[TR$! Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No <R‘P_VOR!GRP\_QRQ!<NaN!#‘a_RNZ!TNbTR%!Z\[Va\_V[T!dRYY%!NR_VNY!]U\a\‘%!]_RcV\b‘!V[‘]RPaV\[‘$%!VS!NcNVYNOYR3! GRZN_X‘3! VSH-1 0-6" 6-13" 10YR (2/1) 10YR (4/2) 100% 100% Sandy clayloam Large rock 13" Depleted below dark surface (A11) present in soil sam Soil is very moist all the way to bottom of pit from the top. Sandy clay loam Large rock restricts digging to 18". JH!8_Zf!;\_]‘!\S!=[TV[RR_‘! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!LR‘aR_[!C\b[aNV[‘%!KNYYRf‘%!N[Q!;\N‘a!j!KR_‘V\[!+’)! WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region ! F_\WRPa(HVaR3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!;Vaf(;\b[af3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HNZ]YV[T!<NaR3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 8]]YVPN[a(Ed[R_3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HaNaR3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HNZ]YV[T!F\V[a3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A[cR‘aVTNa\_#‘$3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HRPaV\[%!I\d[‘UV]%!GN[TR3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BN[QS\_Z!#UVYY‘Y\]R%!aR__NPR%!RaP’$3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!B\PNY!_RYVRS!#P\[PNcR%!P\[cRe%![\[R$3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HY\]R!#"$3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HbO_RTV\[!#BGG$3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!BNa3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!B\[T3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<NabZ3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! H\VY!CN]!J[Va!DNZR3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!DLA!PYN‘‘VSVPNaV\[3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 8_R!PYVZNaVP!(!UfQ_\Y\TVP!P\[QVaV\[‘!\[!aUR!‘VaR!af]VPNY!S\_!aUV‘!aVZR!\S!fRN_7!!MR‘!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!D\!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!#AS![\%!Re]YNV[!V[!GRZN_X‘’$!! 8_R!KRTRaNaV\[!!!!!!!!!!!!%!H\VY!!!!!!!!!!!!!%!\_!@fQ_\Y\Tf!!!!!!!!!!!!!!‘VT[VSVPN[aYf!QV‘ab_ORQ7!!!!!!!!!!!!8_R!hD\_ZNY!;V_PbZ‘aN[PR‘i!]_R‘R[a7!!!MR‘!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!D\!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 8_R!KRTRaNaV\[!!!!!!!!!!!!%!H\VY!!!!!!!!!!!!!%!\_!@fQ_\Y\Tf!!!!!!!!!!!!!![Nab_NYYf!]_\OYRZNaVP7!!!!!!!!!!!!!#AS![RRQRQ%!Re]YNV[!N[f!N[‘dR_‘!V[!GRZN_X‘’$! SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. @fQ_\]UfaVP!KRTRaNaV\[!F_R‘R[a7! MR‘!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!D\!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! @fQ_VP!H\VY!F_R‘R[a7!! MR‘!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!D\!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LRaYN[Q!@fQ_\Y\Tf!F_R‘R[a7! MR‘!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!D\!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No GRZN_X‘3! ! VEGETATION – Use scientific names of plants. Dominance Test worksheet: DbZOR_!\S!<\ZV[N[a!H]RPVR‘!!! IUNa!8_R!E9B%!>8;L%!\_!>8;3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!#8$! I\aNY!DbZOR_!\S!<\ZV[N[a!!!! H]RPVR‘!8P_\‘‘!8YY!Ha_NaN3!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!#9$! FR_PR[a!\S!<\ZV[N[a!H]RPVR‘! IUNa!8_R!E9B%!>8;L%!\_!>8;3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!#8(9$! Prevalence Index worksheet: !!!!!!!I\aNY!"!;\cR_!\S3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!CbYaV]Yf!Of3!!!!!!!! E9B!‘]RPVR‘! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!e!*!5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >8;L!‘]RPVR‘! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!e!+!5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >8;!‘]RPVR‘! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!e!,!5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >8;J!‘]RPVR‘! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!e!-!5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! JFB!‘]RPVR‘! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!e!.!5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ;\YbZ[!I\aNY‘3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!#8$!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!#9$! !!!!!!!!!F_RcNYR[PR!A[QRe!!5!9(8!5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: ! !!!!!!!*!&!GN]VQ!IR‘a!S\_!@fQ_\]UfaVP!KRTRaNaV\[! !!!!!!!+!&!<\ZV[N[PR!IR‘a!V‘!6.)"! !!!!!!!,!&!F_RcNYR[PR!A[QRe!V‘!",’)*! !!!!!!!-!&!C\_]U\Y\TVPNY!8QN]aNaV\[‘*!#F_\cVQR!‘b]]\_aV[T! !!!!!!!!!!!!QNaN!V[!GRZN_X‘!\_!\[!N!‘R]N_NaR!‘URRa$! !!!!!!!.!&!LRaYN[Q!D\[&KN‘PbYN_!FYN[a‘*! !!!!!!!F_\OYRZNaVP!@fQ_\]UfaVP!KRTRaNaV\[*!#=e]YNV[$! *A[QVPNa\_‘!\S!UfQ_VP!‘\VY!N[Q!dRaYN[Q!UfQ_\Y\Tf!Zb‘a! OR!]_R‘R[a%!b[YR‘‘!QV‘ab_ORQ!\_!]_\OYRZNaVP’! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!8O‘\YbaR!!!!<\ZV[N[a!!A[QVPNa\_! I_RR!Ha_NabZ!!!#FY\a!‘VgR3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!$!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!;\cR_!!!!H]RPVR‘7!!!!HaNab‘!!!! *’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ,’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!5!I\aNY!;\cR_! HN]YV[T(HU_bO!Ha_NabZ!!!#FY\a!‘VgR3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!$! *’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ,’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! .’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!5!I\aNY!;\cR_! @R_O!Ha_NabZ!!!#FY\a!‘VgR3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!$! *’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ,’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! .’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! /’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 0’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 2’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! *)’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! **’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!5!I\aNY!;\cR_! L\\Qf!KV[R!Ha_NabZ!!!#FY\a!‘VgR3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!$! *’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! +’!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!5!I\aNY!;\cR_! "!9N_R!?_\b[Q!V[!@R_O!Ha_NabZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No GRZN_X‘3! Site conditions were cloudy/overcast (~70F).The site visit was completed following many days of persistent rain. The sampling area was determined to be upland. 30' Red alder (Alnus rubra) Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) 20% 20% 15% 65% Yes Yes Yes FACU FAC FAC Big leaf maple (Acer macrophyllum)4 8 5'50% Salmonberry (Rubus spectabilis) Himalayan blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) 20% 5% 45% Yes Yes FAC FAC 60 180 70 280 5' Swordfern (Polystichum munitum)15% 20% Yes FACU 130 460 3.54 5' 20%0% Canopy dominated by a mix of Big leaf maple,Red alder,Western red cedar,and Douglas fir. Subcanopy consisted of Salmonberry, Ocean spray, and sapling trees. Herb layer included sword fern and Himalayan blackberry with trailing blackberry throughout sampling plot. Kroh/Temunovic Wetland (Parcel 002331012)Sequim/Jefferson County 9/10/19 Alex Kroh/Peter Temunovic WA VSH-2 Meg Amos Section 33,Township 30N,Range 2W Hillslope Concave 2% A (MLRA 2)48°03'03.23"N 122°56'12.50"W NAD_1983_102748 Belfast Silty Clay Loam (BM), wet variant None Ocean spray (Holodiscus discolor)5%No FACU 20%Yes FACUBigleafmaple(Acer macrophyllum) Western red cedar (Thuja plicata) 10%No FACU Trailing blackberry (Rubus ursinus 20%Yes FACU JH!8_Zf!;\_]‘!\S!=[TV[RR_‘! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!LR‘aR_[!C\b[aNV[‘%!KNYYRf‘%!N[Q!;\N‘a!j!KR_‘V\[!+’)! SOIL! ! ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HNZ]YV[T!F\V[a3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) !<R]aU!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!CNa_Ve!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!GRQ\e!>RNab_R‘!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !#V[PUR‘$!!!!!! !!!!!;\Y\_!#Z\V‘a$!!!!!!!!!!!!"!!!!!! !!!!!;\Y\_!#Z\V‘a$!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!!!!!!!!!If]R*!!!!!!!B\P+!!!!!!!!!!!IReab_R!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!GRZN_X‘!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! *If]R3!!;5;\[PR[a_NaV\[%!<5<R]YRaV\[%!GC5GRQbPRQ!CNa_Ve%!;H5;\cR_RQ!\_!;\NaRQ!HN[Q!?_NV[‘’!!!!!!!!!+B\PNaV\[3!!FB5F\_R!BV[V[T%!C5CNa_Ve’ Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:! !!!!!!!@V‘a\‘\Y!#8*$! !!!!!!!HN[Qf!GRQ\e!#H.$! !!!!!!!+!PZ!CbPX!#8*)$! !!!!!!!@V‘aVP!=]V]RQ\[!#8+$! !!!!!!!Ha_V]]RQ!CNa_Ve!#H/$! !!!!!!!GRQ!FN_R[a!CNaR_VNY!#I>+$! !!!!!!!9YNPX!@V‘aVP!#8,$! !!!!!!!B\NZf!CbPXf!CV[R_NY!#>*$!#except MLRA 1$! !!!!!!!KR_f!HUNYY\d!<N_X!Hb_SNPR!#I>*+$! !!!!!!!@fQ_\TR[!HbYSVQR!#8-$! !!!!!!!B\NZf!?YRfRQ!CNa_Ve!#>+$! !!!!!!!EaUR_!#=e]YNV[!V[!GRZN_X‘$! !!!!!!!<R]YRaRQ!9RY\d!<N_X!Hb_SNPR!#8**$! !!!!!!!<R]YRaRQ!CNa_Ve!#>,$! !!!!!!!IUVPX!<N_X!Hb_SNPR!#8*+$! !!!!!!!GRQ\e!<N_X!Hb_SNPR!#>/$!,A[QVPNa\_‘!\S!UfQ_\]UfaVP!cRTRaNaV\[!N[Q! !!!!!!!HN[Qf!CbPXf!CV[R_NY!#H*$!! !!!!!!!<R]YRaRQ!<N_X!Hb_SNPR!#>0$! !!!!!dRaYN[Q!UfQ_\Y\Tf!Zb‘a!OR!]_R‘R[a%! !!!!!!!HN[Qf!?YRfRQ!CNa_Ve!#H-$! !!!!!!!GRQ\e!<R]_R‘‘V\[‘!#>1$! !!!!!b[YR‘‘!QV‘ab_ORQ!\_!]_\OYRZNaVP’! Restrictive Layer (if present): !!!!!If]R3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!<R]aU!#V[PUR‘$3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! Hydric Soil Present? Yes No GRZN_X‘3! ! ! ! HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: ! F_VZN_f!A[QVPNa\_‘!#ZV[VZbZ!\S!\[R!_R^bV_RQ4!PURPX!NYY!aUNa!N]]Yf$!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HRP\[QN_f!A[QVPNa\_‘!#+!\_!Z\_R!_R^bV_RQ$! !!!!!!!Hb_SNPR!LNaR_!#8*$! !!!!!!!LNaR_&HaNV[RQ!BRNcR‘!#92$!#except! !!!!!!!LNaR_&HaNV[RQ!BRNcR‘!#92$!#MLRA 1, 2,! !!!!!!!@VTU!LNaR_!INOYR!#8+$! !!!!!!!!!!!!MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B)! !!!!!!!!!!! 4A, and 4B) !!!!!!!HNab_NaV\[!#8,$! !!!!!!!HNYa!;_b‘a!#9**$! !!!!!!!<_NV[NTR!FNaaR_[‘!#9*)$! !!!!!!!LNaR_!CN_X‘!#9*$!! !!!!!!!8^bNaVP!A[cR_aRO_NaR‘!#9*,$! !!!!!!!<_f&HRN‘\[!LNaR_!INOYR!#;+$! !!!!!!!HRQVZR[a!<R]\‘Va‘!#9+$!! !!!!!!!@fQ_\TR[!HbYSVQR!EQ\_!#;*$! !!!!!!!HNab_NaV\[!KV‘VOYR!\[!8R_VNY!AZNTR_f!#;2$! !!!!!!!<_VSa!<R]\‘Va‘!#9,$!! !!!!!!!EeVQVgRQ!GUVg\‘]UR_R‘!NY\[T!BVcV[T!G\\a‘!#;,$! !!!!!!!?R\Z\_]UVP!F\‘VaV\[!#<+$! !!!!!!!8YTNY!CNa!\_!;_b‘a!#9-$! !!!!!!!F_R‘R[PR!\S!GRQbPRQ!A_\[!#;-$! !!!!!!!HUNYY\d!8^bVaN_Q!#<,$! !!!!!!!A_\[!<R]\‘Va‘!#9.$! !!!!!!!GRPR[a!A_\[!GRQbPaV\[!V[!IVYYRQ!H\VY‘!#;/$! !!!!!!!>8;&DRba_NY!IR‘a!#<.$! !!!!!!!Hb_SNPR!H\VY!;_NPX‘!#9/$! !!!!!!!Hab[aRQ!\_!Ha_R‘‘RQ!FYN[a‘!#<*$!#LRR A$! !!!!!!!GNV‘RQ!8[a!C\b[Q‘!#</$!#LRR A$! !!!!!!!A[b[QNaV\[!KV‘VOYR!\[!8R_VNY!AZNTR_f!#90$! !!!!!!!EaUR_!#=e]YNV[!V[!GRZN_X‘$! !!!!!!!>_\‘a&@RNcR!@bZZ\PX‘!#<0$! !!!!!!!H]N_‘RYf!KRTRaNaRQ!;\[PNcR!Hb_SNPR!#91$! Field Observations: Hb_SNPR!LNaR_!F_R‘R[a7! MR‘!!!!!!!!!!!!!D\!!!!!!!!!!!!!<R]aU!#V[PUR‘$3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LNaR_!INOYR!F_R‘R[a7!! MR‘!!!!!!!!!!!!!D\!!!!!!!!!!!!!<R]aU!#V[PUR‘$3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HNab_NaV\[!F_R‘R[a7!!!! MR‘!!!!!!!!!!!!!D\!!!!!!!!!!!!!<R]aU!#V[PUR‘$3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! #V[PYbQR‘!PN]VYYN_f!S_V[TR$! Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No <R‘P_VOR!GRP\_QRQ!<NaN!#‘a_RNZ!TNbTR%!Z\[Va\_V[T!dRYY%!NR_VNY!]U\a\‘%!]_RcV\b‘!V[‘]RPaV\[‘$%!VS!NcNVYNOYR3! GRZN_X‘3! VSH-2 N/A N/A No hydric soils present.Duff on top with very dry, crumbly, root filled layer directly beneath. No hydrologic indicators present. Very dry, even after heavy rains for past few days. Name of wetland (or ID #):Date of site visit:9/10/2019 Rated by Trained by Ecology? Yes No Date of training 18-Oct HGM Class used for rating Wetland has multiple HGM classes? Yes No NOTE: Form is not complete with out the figures requested (figures can be combined ). Source of base aerial photo/map OVERALL WETLAND CATEGORY IV (based on functions or special characteristics ) 1. Category of wetland based on FUNCTIONS Category I - Total score = 23 - 27 Score for each Category II - Total score = 20 - 22 function based Category III - Total score = 16 - 19 on three X Category IV - Total score = 9 - 15 ratings (order of ratings is not important ) M L 9 = H, H, H M H 8 = H, H, M L L Total 7 = H, H, L 7 = H, M, M 6 = H, M, L 6 = M, M, M 5 = H, L, L 5 = M, M, L 4 = M, L, L 3 = L, L, L 2. Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland Slope RATING SUMMARY – Western Washington List appropriate rating (H, M, L) HydrologicFUNCTION None of the above CHARACTERISTIC Category Estuarine Wetland of High Conservation Value Bog Mature Forest Old Growth Forest Habitat M NAD 1983 102748 Kroh Wetland Meg Amos and Paul Ruben Coastal Lagoon Interdunal Value Score Based on Ratings 4 5 5 14 L Improving Water Quality LSite Potential Landscape Potential Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 1 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Appendices and Attachmentss Appendix B. Wetland Rating Form Wetland name or number Kroh Wetland Maps and Figures required to answer questions correctly for Western Washington Depressional Wetlands Map of: Figure # Cowardin plant classes Hydroperiods Location of outlet (can be added to map of hydroperiods) Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to another figure) Map of the contributing basin 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) Riverine Wetlands Map of: Figure # Cowardin plant classes Hydroperiods Ponded depressions Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to another figure) Plant cover of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants Width of unit vs. width of stream (can be added to another figure) Map of the contributing basin 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) Lake Fringe Wetlands Map of: Figure # Cowardin plant classes Plant cover of trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to another figure) 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website) Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web) Slope Wetlands Map of: Figure # Cowardin plant classes Attachment 1 Hydroperiods Attachment 2 Plant cover of dense trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants Attachment 1 Plant cover of dense, rigid trees, shrubs, and herbaceous plants (can be added to another figure ) Boundary of area within 150 ft of the wetland (can be added to another figure)Attachment 2 1 km Polygon: Area that extends 1 km from entire wetland edge - including polygons for accessible habitat and undisturbed habitat Screen capture of map of 303(d) listed waters in basin (from Ecology website)Attachment 4 Screen capture of list of TMDLs for WRIA in which unit is found (from web)Attachment 4 S 3.1, S 3.2 S 3.3 S 4.1 S 2.1, S 5.1 To answer questions: H 1.1, H 1.4 H 1.2 S 1.3 H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 L 1.2 L 2.2 L 3.1, L 3.2 L 3.3 H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 R 3.1 R 3.2, R 3.3 To answer questions: L 1.1, L 4.1, H 1.1, H 1.4 To answer questions: D 1.3, H 1.1, H 1.4 D 1.4, H 1.2 D 1.1, D 4.1 D 2.2, D 5.2 D 4.3, D 5.3 H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 D 3.1, D 3.2 D 3.3 To answer questions: H 1.1, H 1.4 H 1.2 R 1.1 R 2.4 R 1.2, R 4.2 R 4.1 R 2.2, R 2.3, R 5.2 H 2.1, H 2.2, H 2.3 Attachment 1 Attachment 3 Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 2 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number Kroh Wetland For questions 1 -7, the criteria described must apply to the entire unit being rated. 1. Are the water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides except during floods? NO - go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe - go to 1.1 1.1 Is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per thousand)? NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine)YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO - go to 3 YES - The wetland class is Flats If your wetland can be classified as a Flats wetland, use the form for Depressional wetlands. 3. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? NO - go to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake Fringe (Lacustrine Fringe) 4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual ), The water leaves the wetland without being impounded. NO - go to 5 YES - The wetland class is Slope 5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria? The overbank flooding occurs at least once every 2 years. NO - go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine NOTE: The Riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is not flooding. If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine wetlands. If it is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is an Estuarine wetland and is not scored. This method cannot be used to score functions for estuarine wetlands. The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores of a body of permanent open water (without any plants on the surface at any time of the year) at least 20 ac (8 ha) in size; The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without distinct banks. NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in very small and shallow depressions or behind hummocks (depressions are usually <3 ft diameter and less than 1 ft deep). The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank flooding from that stream or river, 2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it. Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit. At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m). HGM Classification of Wetland in Western Washington If hydrologic criteria listed in each question do not apply to the entire unit being rated, you probably have a unit with multiple HGM classes. In this case, identify which hydrologic criteria in questions 1 - 7 apply, and go to Question 8. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 3 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number Kroh Wetland NO - go to 7 YES - The wetland class is Depressional NO - go to 8 YES - The wetland class is Depressional Slope + Lake Fringe Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary of depression Depressional + Lake Fringe Riverine + Lake Fringe 7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank flooding? The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious natural outlet. 8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM classes. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small stream within a Depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7 APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several HGM classes present within the wetland unit being scored. 6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the surface, at some time during the year? This means that any outlet, if present, is higher than the interior of the wetland. Treat as ESTUARINE NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is recommended in the second column represents 10% or more of the total area of the wetland unit being rated. If the area of the HGM class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area. HGM classes within the wetland unit being rated Slope + Riverine Slope + Depressional If you are still unable to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or if you have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional for the rating. Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class of freshwater wetland HGM class to use in rating Riverine Depressional Lake Fringe Depressional Depressional Riverine Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 4 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number Kroh Wetland Slope is 1% or less points = 3 Slope is > 1% - 2%points = 2 Slope is > 2% - 5%points = 1 Slope is greater than 5%points = 0 Yes = 3 No = 0 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > 90% of the wetland area points = 6 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > ½ of area points = 3 Dense, woody, plants > ½ of area points = 2 Dense, uncut, herbaceous plants > ¼ of area points = 1 Does not meet any of the criteria above for plants points = 0 Total for S 1 Add the points in the boxes above 5 Rating of Site Potential If score is: 12 = H 6 - 11 = M 0 - 5 = L Record the rating on the first page Yes = 1 No = 0 Other Sources Yes = 1 No = 0 Total for S 2 Add the points in the boxes above 1 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 1 - 2 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page Yes = 1 No = 0 Yes = 1 No = 0 Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for S 3 Add the points in the boxes above 0 Rating of Value If score is: 2 - 4 = H 1 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page S 3.0. Is the water quality improvement provided by the site valuable to society? S 3.1. Does the wetland discharge directly (i.e., within 1 mi) to a stream, river, lake, or marine water that is on the 303(d) list?0 0 0 S 3.2. Is the wetland in a basin or sub-basin where water quality is an issue? At least one aquatic resource in the basin is on the 303(d) list. S 3.3. Has the site been identified in a watershed or local plan as important for maintaining water quality? Answer YES if there is a TMDL for the basin in which the unit is found ? Water Quality Functions - Indicators that the site functions to improve water quality S 1.0. Does the site have the potential to improve water quality? S 1.1. Characteristics of the average slope of the wetland: (a 1% slope has a 1 ft vertical drop in elevation for every 100 ft of horizontal distance ) 2 S 1.2. The soil 2 in below the surface (or duff layer) is true clay or true organic (use NRCS definitions ):0 S 1.3. Characteristics of the plants in the wetland that trap sediments and pollutants: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits the plants in the wetland. Dense means you have trouble seeing the soil surface (>75% cover), and uncut means not grazed or mowed and plants are higher than 6 in. 3 S 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the water quality function of the site? S 2.1. Is > 10% of the area within 150 ft on the uphill side of the wetland in land uses that generate pollutants?1 S 2.2. Are there other sources of pollutants coming into the wetland that are not listed in question S 2.1?0 SLOPE WETLANDS Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 5 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number Kroh Wetland Dense, uncut, rigid plants cover > 90% of the area of the wetland points = 1 All other conditions points = 0 Rating of Site Potential If score is: 1 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page Yes = 1 No = 0 Rating of Landscape Potential If score is: 1 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page S 6.1. Distance to the nearest areas downstream that have flooding problems: points = 2 Surface flooding problems are in a sub-basin farther down-gradient points = 1 No flooding problems anywhere downstream points = 0 Yes = 2 No = 0 Total for S 6 Add the points in the boxes above 0 Rating of Value If score is: 2 - 4 = H 1 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page NOTES and FIELD OBSERVATIONS: S 6.2. Has the site been identified as important for flood storage or flood conveyance in a regional flood control plan?0 Hydrologic Functions - Indicators that the site functions to reduce flooding and stream erosion S 4.0. Does the site have the potential to reduce flooding and stream erosion?S 4.1. Characteristics of plants that reduce the velocity of surface flows during storms: Choose the points appropriate for the description that best fits conditions in the wetland. Stems of plants should be thick enough (usually > 1 /8 in), or dense enough, to remain erect during surface flows.1 S 5.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support hydrologic functions of the site? S 5.1. Is more than 25% of the area within 150 ft upslope of wetland in land uses or cover that generate excess surface runoff?1 The sub-basin immediately down-gradient of site has flooding problems that result in damage to human or natural resources (e.g., houses or salmon redds)0 S 6.0. Are the hydrologic functions provided by the site valuable to society? SLOPE WETLANDS Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 6 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number A HABITAT FUNCTIONS - Indicators that site functions to provide important habitat H 1.0. Does the site have the potential to provide habitat? Aquatic bed 4 structures or more: points = 4 Emergent 3 structures: points = 2 Scrub-shrub (areas where shrubs have > 30% cover)2 structures: points - 1 Forested (areas where trees have > 30% cover)1 structure: points = 0 If the unit has a Forested class, check if : H 1.2. Hydroperiods Permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present: points = 3 Seasonally flooded or inundated 3 types present: points = 2 Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present: points = 1 Saturated only 1 types present: points = 0 Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland Lake Fringe wetland 2 points Freshwater tidal wetland 2 points H 1.3. Richness of plant species If you counted:> 19 species points = 2 5 - 19 species points = 1 < 5 species points = 0 H 1.4. Interspersion of habitats Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion among Cowardin plants classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or mudflats) is high, moderate, low, or none. If you have four or more plant classes or three classes and open water, the rating is always high. None = 0 points Low = 1 point Moderate = 2 points All three diagrams in this row are HIGH = 3 points 0 Check the types of water regimes (hydroperiods) present within the wetland. The water regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or ¼ ac to count (see text for descriptions of hydroperiods ). 0 Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ft2.Different patches of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold and you do not have to name the species. Do not include Eurasian milfoil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife, Canadian thistle 2 These questions apply to wetlands of all HGM classes. The Forested class has 3 out of 5 strata (canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs, herbaceous, moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the Forested polygon 0 H 1.1. Structure of plant community: Indicators are Cowardin classes and strata within the Forested class. Check the Cowardin plant classes in the wetland. Up to 10 patches may be combined for each class to meet the threshold of ¼ ac or more than 10% of the unit if it is smaller than 2.5 ac. Add the number of structures checked. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 7 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 H 1.5. Special habitat features: Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (> 4 in diameter and 6 ft long) Standing snags (dbh > 4 in) within the wetland Total for H 1 Add the points in the boxes above 2 Rating of Site Potential If Score is: 15 - 18 = H 7 - 14 = M 0 - 6 = L Record the rating on the first page H 2.0. Does the landscape have the potential to support the habitat function of the site? H 2.1 Accessible habitat (include only habitat that directly abuts wetland unit ). Calculate: 25 % undisturbed habitat + (50 % moderate & low intensity land uses / 2 ) = 50% If total accessible habitat is: > 1/3 (33.3%) of 1 km Polygon points = 3 20 - 33% of 1 km Polygon points = 2 10 - 19% of 1 km Polygon points = 1 < 10 % of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.2. Undisturbed habitat in 1 km Polygon around the wetland. Calculate: 65 % undisturbed habitat + (20 % moderate & low intensity land uses / 2 ) = 75% Undisturbed habitat > 50% of Polygon points = 3 Undisturbed habitat 10 - 50% and in 1-3 patches points = 2 Undisturbed habitat 10 - 50% and > 3 patches points = 1 Undisturbed habitat < 10% of 1 km Polygon points = 0 H 2.3 Land use intensity in 1 km Polygon: If > 50% of 1 km Polygon is high intensity land use points = (-2) ≤ 50% of 1km Polygon is high intensity points = 0 Total for H 2 Add the points in the boxes above 6 Rating of Landscape Potential If Score is: 4 - 6 = H 1 - 3 = M < 1 = L Record the rating on the first page Site meets ANY of the following criteria:points = 2 It has 3 or more priority habitats within 100 m (see next page) It is mapped as a location for an individual WDFW priority species Site has 1 or 2 priority habitats (listed on next page) with in 100m points = 1 Site does not meet any of the criteria above points = 0 Rating of Value If Score is: 2 = H 1 = M 0 = L Record the rating on the first page 3 3 0 H 3.0. Is the habitat provided by the site valuable to society? H 3.1. Does the site provide habitat for species valued in laws, regulations, or policies? Choose only the highest score that applies to the wetland being rated . It provides habitat for Threatened or Endangered species (any plant or animal on the state or federal lists) Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2 m) and/or overhanging plants extends at least 3.3 ft (1 m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the wetland, for at least 33 ft (10 m) Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning (> 30 degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that have not yet weathered where wood is exposed ) At least ¼ ac of thin-stemmed persistent plants or woody branches are present in areas that are permanently or seasonally inundated (structures for egg-laying by amphibians ) It has been categorized as an important habitat site in a local or regional comprehensive plan, in a Shoreline Master Plan, or in a watershed plan Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the number of points. It is a Wetland of High Conservation Value as determined by the Department of Natural Resources 0 Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in every stratum of plants (see H 1.1 for list of strata ) 0 Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 8 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number Kroh Wetland Wetland name or number Kroh Wetland Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 1 ac (0.4 ha). Herbaceous Balds: Variable size patches of grass and forbs on shallow soils over bedrock. Cliffs: Greater than 25 ft (7.6 m) high and occurring below 5000 ft elevation. http://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/00165/wdfw00165.pdf or access the list from here: http://wdfw.wa.gov/conservation/phs/list/ Priority habitats listed by WDFW (see complete descriptions of WDFW priority habitats, and the counties in which they can be found, in: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2008. Priority Habitat and Species List. Olympia, Washington. 177 pp. WDFW Priority Habitats Count how many of the following priority habitats are within 330 ft (100 m) of the wetland unit: NOTE : This question is independent of the land use between the wetland unit and the priority habitat. Biodiversity Areas and Corridors: Areas of habitat that are relatively important to various species of native fish and wildlife (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report ). Old-growth/Mature forests: Old-growth west of Cascade crest – Stands of at least 2 tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha) > 32 in (81 cm) dbh or > 200 years of age. Mature forests – Stands with average diameters exceeding 21 in (53 cm) dbh; crown cover may be less than 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-growth; 80-200 years old west of the Cascade crest. Oregon White Oak: Woodland stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where canopy coverage of the oak component is important (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 158 – see web link above ). Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other. Westside Prairies: Herbaceous, non-forested plant communities that can either take the form of a dry prairie or a wet prairie (full descriptions in WDFW PHS report p. 161 – see web link above ). Instream: The combination of physical, biological, and chemical processes and conditions that interact to provide functional life history requirements for instream fish and wildlife resources. Nearshore: Relatively undisturbed nearshore habitats. These include Coastal Nearshore, Open Coast Nearshore, and Puget Sound Nearshore. (full descriptions of habitats and the definition of relatively undisturbed are in WDFW report – see web link on previous page ). Snags and Logs: Trees are considered snags if they are dead or dying and exhibit sufficient decay characteristics to enable cavity excavation/use by wildlife. Priority snags have a diameter at breast height of > 20 in (51 cm) in western Washington and are > 6.5 ft (2 m) in height. Priority logs are > 12 in (30 cm) in diameter at the largest end, and > 20 ft (6 m) long. Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.5 - 6.5 ft (0.15 - 2.0 m), composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine tailings. May be associated with cliffs. Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages under the earth in soils, rock, ice, or other geological formations and is large enough to contain a human. Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this list because they are addressed elsewhere. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 9 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland Type Category Check off any criteria that apply to the wetland. List the category when the appropriate criteria are met. SC 1.0. Estuarine Wetlands Does the wetland meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands? The dominant water regime is tidal, Vegetated, and With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt Yes - Go to SC 1.1 No = Not an estuarine wetland SC 1.1. Yes = Category I No - Go to SC 1.2 SC 1.2.Is the wetland unit at least 1 ac in size and meets at least two of the following three conditions? Yes = Category I No = Category II SC 2.0. Wetlands of High Conservation Value (WHCV) SC 2.1. Yes - Go to SC 2.2 No - Go to SC 2.3 SC 2.2.Is the wetland listed on the WDNR database as a Wetland of High Conservation Value? Yes = Category I No = Not WHCV SC 2.3.Is the wetland in a Section/Township/Range that contains a Natural Heritage wetland? http://www1.dnr.wa.gov/nhp/refdesk/datasearch/wnhpwetlands.pdf Yes - Contact WNHP/WDNR and to SC 2.4 No = Not WHCV SC 2.4. Yes = Category I No = Not WHCV SC 3.0. Bogs SC 3.1. Yes - Go to SC 3.3 No - Go to SC 3.2 SC 3.2. Yes - Go to SC 3.3 No = Is not a bog SC 3.3. Yes = Is a Category I bog No - Go to SC 3.4 SC 3.4. Yes = Is a Category I bog No = Is not a bog Has WDNR identified the wetland within the S/T/R as a Wetland of High Conservation Value and listed it on their website? Has the WA Department of Natural Resources updated their website to include the list of Wetlands of High Conservation Value? Does the wetland (or any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and vegetation in bogs? Use the key below. If you answer YES you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions . Does an area within the wetland unit have organic soil horizons, either peats or mucks, that compose 16 in or more of the first 32 in of the soil profile? Does an area within the wetland unit have organic soils, either peats or mucks, that are less than 16 in deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or volcanic ash, or that are floating on top of a lake or pond? Does an area with peats or mucks have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND at least a 30% cover of plant species listed in Table 4? NOTE: If you are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory, you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH of the water that seeps into a hole dug at least 16 in deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the plant species in Table 4 are present, the wetland is a bog. Is an area with peats or mucks forested (> 30% cover) with Sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Engelmann spruce, or western white pine, AND any of the species (or combination of species) listed in Table 4 provide more than 30% of the cover under the canopy? CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS Is the wetland within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park, National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational, Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151? The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10% cover of non-native plant species. (If non-native species are Spartina , see page 25) At least ¾ of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un- grazed or un-mowed grassland. The wetland has at least two of the following features: tidal channels, depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands. Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 10 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number Kroh Wetland SC 4.0. Forested Wetlands Yes = Category I No = Not a forested wetland for this section SC 5.0. Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria of a wetland in a coastal lagoon? Yes - Go to SC 5.1 No = Not a wetland in a coastal lagoon SC 5.1. Does the wetland meet all of the following three conditions? The wetland is larger than 1/10 ac (4350 ft2) Yes = Category I No = Category II SC 6.0. Interdunal Wetlands In practical terms that means the following geographic areas: Long Beach Peninsula: Lands west of SR 103 Grayland-Westport: Lands west of SR 105 Ocean Shores-Copalis: Lands west of SR 115 and SR 109 Yes - Go to SC 6.1 No = Not an interdunal wetland for rating SC 6.1. Yes = Category I No - Go to SC 6.2 SC 6.2.Is the wetland 1 ac or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is 1 ac or larger? Yes = Category II No - Go to SC 6.3 SC 6.3. Yes = Category III No = Category IV Category of wetland based on Special Characteristics If you answered No for all types, enter “Not Applicable” on Summary Form At least ¾ of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of shrub, forest, or un- grazed or un-mowed grassland. Is the wetland west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland Ownership or WBUO)? If you answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its habitat functions. Is the wetland 1 ac or larger and scores an 8 or 9 for the habitat functions on the form (rates H,H,H or H,H,M for the three aspects of function)? Is the unit between 0.1 and 1 ac, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is between 0.1 and 1 ac? The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of aggressive, opportunistic plant species (see list of species on p. 100). The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks, shingle, or, less frequently, rocks The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains ponded water that is saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion of the lagoon (needs to be measured near the bottom ) Does the wetland have at least 1 contiguous acre of forest that meets one of these criteria for the WA Department of Fish and Wildlife’s forests as priority habitats? If you answer YES you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions. Old-growth forests (west of Cascade crest): Stands of at least two tree species, forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8 trees/ac (20 trees/ha) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a diameter at breast height (dbh) of 32 in (81 cm) or more. Mature forests (west of the Cascade Crest): Stands where the largest trees are 80- 200 years old OR the species that make up the canopy have an average diameter (dbh) exceeding 21 in (53 cm). Wetland Rating System for Western WA: 2014 Update Rating Form - Effective January 1, 2015 11 WSDOT Adapted Form - January 14, 2015 Wetland name or number Kroh Wetland Client: Alex Kroh Cowardin Plant Class Map Attachment Google. Imagery ©2019. Digital Globe U.S. Geological Survey Drawn: 9/19/2019 Drawn By: PJR Parcel No. 002331012 1NE 1/4 Section: 33 Township: 30N Range: 2W Discovery Bay, Washington 98368 Checked By: Parcel 002331012 Forested Plant Class Legend Client: Alex Kroh Hydroperiod Map Attachment Google. Imagery ©2019. Digital Globe U.S. Geological Survey Drawn: 9/19/2019 Drawn By: PJR Parcel No. 002331012 2NE 1/4 Section: 33 Township: 30N Range: 2W Discovery Bay, Washington 98368 Checked By: Parcel 002331012 Hydroperiod 150' Hydroperiod Buffer Legend Client: Alex Kroh 1 km Polygon Land Use Map AttachmentYang, L., Jin, S., Danielson, P., Homer, C., Gass, L., Case, A., Costello, C., Dewitz, J., Fry, J., Funk, M., Grannemann, B., Rigge, M. and G. Xian. 2018. A New Generation of the United States National Land Cover Database: Requirements, Research Priorities, Design, and Implementation Strategies, p. 108–123. Drawn: 9/19/2019 Drawn By: PJR Parcel No. 002331012 3NE 1/4 Section: 33 Township: 30N Range: 2W Discovery Bay, Washington 98368 Checked By: WA Dept. of Ecology© 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019)Distribution Airbus DS © 2019 HERE September 18, 2019 0 0.25 0.50.125Miles K WQ Improvement ProjectsApprovedIn Development WQ Standards Attachment 4. Water Quality Atlas Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics,CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS UserCommunity, Jefferson County, WA., Pro-West & Associates, Inc.³These data are provided on an "AS-IS" basis, without warranty of any type, expressed or implied, including but not limited to any warranty as to their performance, merchantability, or fitness for any particular purpose.This map is not a substitute for accurate field surveys or for locating actual property lines and any adjacent features.Date: 9/18/20191:18,056 Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS Legend Parcels - Critical Areas Report FEMA Flood Zones A AE AE FLOODWAY VE X 0.2 PCT ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD HAZARD Tax Parcel Road Centerline Labels Road Centerlines County Boundary Attachment 5. FEMA Flood Zone SOURCE DATASET:WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFEPRIORITY HABITATS AND SPECIES REPORTREPORT DATE:P190919081113PHSPlusPublic09/19/2019 8.11Query ID:Priority AreaCommon NameAccuracySource EntityOccurrence TypeResolutionNotesSource DateSite NamePHS Listing StatusScientific NameSource DatasetState StatusMgmt RecommendationsMore Information (URL)Sensitive DataFederal StatusGeometry TypeSource RecordDISCLAIMER. This report includes information that the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) maintains in a central computer database. It is not an attempt to provide you with an official agency responseas to the impacts of your project on fish and wildlife. This information only documents the location of fish and wildlife resources to the best of our knowledge. It is not a complete inventory and it is important to note that fishand wildlife resources may occur in areas not currently known to WDFW biologists, or in areas for which comprehensive surveys have not been conducted. Site specific surveys are frequently necesssary to rule out thepresence of priority resources. Locations of fish and wildlife resources are subject to vraition caused by disturbance, changes in season and weather, and other factors. WDFW does not recommend using reports more thansix months old.09/19/2019 8.111Attachment 6. WDFW PHS Report WDFW Test Map Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/AirbusDS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community PHS Report Clip Area PT LN POLY AS MAPPED SECTION QTR-TWP TOWNSHIP September 19, 2019 0 0.3 0.60.15 mi 0 0.55 1.10.275 km 1:19,842