Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Draft SMP Complete Package 1 Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Staff Report By: BERK Consulting, Inc., Shannon & Wilson, and Jefferson County Community Development Department Purpose of Periodic Review Jefferson County is undertaking a periodic review of its Shoreline Master Program (SMP; Chapter 18.25 Jefferson County Code), as required by the Washington State Shoreline Management Act (SMA), RCW 90.58.080(4) (see Appendix A). The SMA requires each SMP be reviewed and revised, if needed, on an eight-year schedule established by the Legislature. The review ensures the SMP stays current with changes in laws and rules, remains consistent with other Jefferson County plans and regulations, and is responsive to changed circumstances, new information and improved data. This staff report describes the County’s public outreach efforts, summarizes proposed SMP amendments and evaluates how the draft amendments are consistent with county and state requirements. Specific sections of this report are listed in the table of contents below: Purpose of Periodic Review .................................................................................................................. 1 Summary of Public Outreach ................................................................................................................ 2 Summary of Amendments .................................................................................................................... 3 Evaluation ............................................................................................................................................. 5 Appendices............................................................................................................................................ 7 DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report 2 Summary of Public Outreach In summer 2020, Jefferson County prepared a public participation plan designed to help the County meet the following period review requirements: In conducting the periodic review, the department and local governments, pursuant to RCW 90.58.130, shall make all reasonable efforts to inform, fully involve and encourage participation of all interested persons and private entities, tribes, and agencies of the federal, state or local government having interests and responsibilities relating to shorelines of the state and the local master program. Local governments may follow the public participation procedures under either the standard local process outlined in WAC 173-26-100, or the optional joint review process outlined in WAC 173-26-104. The County is preparing its periodic review as part of the optional joint review process where the County and the Washington Department of Ecology are developing the draft amendments in coordination and conducting a unified comment period and hearing. The County has also developed the SMP amendments as part of a state grant. Public outreach efforts designed to encourage public, agency, and tribal participation include: ▪ A project website where information and events are posted: https://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/1481/Shoreline-Master-Program-Periodic-Review#. ▪ A Story Map and Survey were posted to the website and a postcard advertising the survey was emailed to interested persons and published in media. See Appendix B for survey results. About 93 persons responded to the survey from September to December 2020. About two thirds lived/owned/had access to a shoreline within 200 feet, primarily along marine waters. Only about 11 had sought shoreline permits. Protecting shoreline ecological functions and respecting property rights were supported principles. Improved or maintained water quality, public access, and fishing/crabbing were identified as desired activities. Several topics of concern around permitting, clarity of shoreline and critical area regulations, climate change, boating regulations, and others were identified as areas of potential review. ▪ Shoreline Task Force with representatives from across the county and with expertise and interest in shoreline ecology, marine industries, etc. The Task Force met over fall 2020 and developed a scope to shape the focus of the proposed SMP amendments to address local conditions and regulatory reform meant to retain environmental protection and reduce unnecessary procedures. See Appendix C for a scoping summary. ▪ Agency, Tribe, and Stakeholder Meetings that include but are not limited to: Jefferson County Chamber of Commerce (October 2020), Jefferson County Association of Realtors (October 2020), Marine Resource Committee (November 2020), and a multi-agency meeting with Skokomish Tribe, Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe, WDFW, DNR, Ecology, Port Townsend, Kitsap County, and others in January 2021. For more information on these meetings, please see the project website above. DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report 3 Summary of Amendments The consultants and County reviewed the current SMP in relation to the Periodic Review Checklist (Appendix D) and the Task Force scoping results (Appendix C). A first draft of amendments was shared with the Washington Department of Ecology (November), the Task Force (December 2020) and with stakeholders (October 2020-January 2021). After early review with Washington Department of Ecology as of January and April 2021, a draft set of revisions were prepared. A summary appears in the table below. See details of the proposed changes in Appendix E. Exhibit 1. Summary of Draft SMP Amendments May 2021 Section Summary of Proposed Key Changes General Format As amended through the periodic review, the codified version at Jefferson County Chapter 18.25 would replace the previously approved 2014 consolidated program version. The Official Shoreline Map (Appendix A) in Article XI retains the 2014 Appendix but will be republished. Appendix B JCC 18.22 critical areas ordinance as it existed in 2014 will be replaced with County Ordinance 05- 0310-20 that repealed and replaced the critical areas ordinance in 2020. Article I. Introduction Clarify SMP does not apply to lands under exclusive federal jurisdiction. Remove detail on critical areas regulations – refer to later section where incorporation by reference of critical areas is addressed. Article II. Definitions Update definitions for greater consistency with State law and rules, and to improve clarity and implementation. Article III. Master Program Goals Add in goals addressing climate change and adaptation, largely from the Comprehensive Plan. Support marine trades. Article IV. Shoreline Jurisdiction and Environment Designations Retain shoreline environment designations. Clarify west end rivers are aquatic below the ordinary high water mark. Amend Table 18.25.220 – Permitted, Conditional and Prohibited Uses consistent with other changes responding to state laws/periodic checklist (e.g. geoduck aquaculture, ocean uses) as well as regulatory reform and task force proposals (e.g. beach access, boat launches, mooring buoys). Article V. Shorelines of Statewide Significance Add management principles to assist in applying use preferences for shorelines of statewide significance. Article VI. General Policies and Regulations Amend policies to support protection of critical areas to assure no net loss of shoreline ecological function. Buffers are retained and language clarified for interpretation. Update the incorporation by reference to 2020 set of critical area ordinance. Define existing term of active use applied to buffer usage. Clarify modest home provision on new and existing single-family homes. Incorporate County interpretations regarding nonconforming septic repair and stormwater improvements, similar to critical area regulations. Clarify side yard widths are consistent with zoning. DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report 4 Section Summary of Proposed Key Changes Allow for changes in height with a variance to respond to sea level rise. Clarify normal maintenance of vegetation. Clarify both new and existing development should retain vegetation. Article VII. Shoreline Modifications Policies and Regulations Beach access structures: Modify permit types for regulatory reform goals while retaining requirements and protections including prohibition waterward of the ordinary high water mark. Boat launch: Adjust permit types for regulatory reform goals while retaining requirements and protections. Add reference to state rules that apply to boat launches. Mooring buoys: Amend performance standards to require consistency with Corps of Engineers. Limit residences to two mooring buoys to stabilize a single boat to minimize damage. Clarify avoid and minimize effects to eelgrass patches as well as beds to improve implementation. Encourage Restoration: Reference state rules that allow for relief from SMP for restoration in urban growth areas. Shoreline Stabilization: Clarify requirements for geotechnical analysis for shoreline stabilization and match state rules. Match state rules on soft shoreline stabilization approaches. Article VIII. Use-Specific Policies and Regulations Agriculture: Add in policies addressing climate change and adaptation, largely from the Comprehensive Plan. Cross-reference agriculture/critical area regulations. Aquaculture: Match 2011 state shoreline rules regarding (new) geoduck aquaculture. Relocate finfish aquaculture maps to Article XI. Reduce redundancy and improve consistency with state rules on review criteria and permit requirement for geoduck conditional use permits. Commercial use: Clarify that maritime education and public uses should follow commercial standards. Forst practice: Match state law on forest practice requirements. Transportation: Incorporate Comprehensive Plan policies on sea level rise and adapting/mitigating transportation facilities. Article IX. Permit Criteria and Exemptions Update exemptions to match state rules (e.g. fair market value, add ADA retrofit, cross reference state requirements). Article X. Administration and Enforcement Clarify permit type and review procedures. Add required changes per state laws and rules on development not required to obtain shoreline permits (e.g. WSDOT facility maintenance) or that have special review requirements. Non-conforming single family home expansions one-time enlargement: Minor expansions, non-waterward: Allow for lateral expansion subject to the square footage limitations subject to a Type II permit that includes notice. Add a more specific planting plan intended to provide no-net-loss through equivalent enhancement of the shoreline buffer. Also add a monitoring plan to help respond to tribal and agency input. DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report 5 Section Summary of Proposed Key Changes Minor expansions, waterward: Retain provision to allow filling in a notch in existing structure foundation wall. Allow for no more than 200 square feet enclosure of existing porch on existing legally installed impervious area, if landward of the common line setback, and if providing a planting plan and revegetating the area with 80% native plantings; similar to modest home provision but for small expansions (e.g. expand kitchen in only place possible). Moderate expansions: Retain provisions allowing lateral, vertical, or landward expansion, with discretionary permit; add details and standards for a planting plan and add monitoring and retention of enhanced vegetation. Recognize existing residential development with no change as conforming per 2011 state rules. Add state rules on transmittal of permits to Ecology. Clarify SMP amendment process per state rules. Article XI. Shoreline Mapping Relocated finfish maps are here. Per state requirements, added a list of waterbodies subject to SMP based on the Inventory and Characterization Report. Article XII. Ocean Management The Ocean Resources Management Act (ORMA; RCW 43.143) and WAC 173- 26-360 have long been in effect; the current SMP’s ORMA cross reference provision was adequate for 2014 approval. Since then the Washington Marine Spatial Plan (MSP) was adopted in 2018, and the SMP now needs adequate provisions to fully implement ORMA & the MSP as required by state law and rules. Evaluation The SMP Periodic update is meant to address requirements of state law and county code. The legal frameworks are excerpted below with staff evaluation in italics. Shoreline Management Act, RCW 90.58.080: local governments shall conduct a review of their master programs at least once every eight years as required by (b) of this subsection. Following the review required by this subsection (4), local governments shall, if necessary, revise their master programs. The purpose of the review is: (i) To assure that the master program complies with applicable law and guidelines in effect at the time of the review; and (ii) To assure consistency of the master program with the local government's comprehensive plan and development regulations adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, if applicable, and other local requirements. Evaluation of RCW 90.58.080: The Jefferson County SMP Periodic Review amendments are based on an evaluation of state laws and rules using the Washington Department of Ecology’s Periodic Review Checklist. As a result of SMP Task Force input on the scope several Comprehensive Plan policies were integrated into the SMP. As well, the latest critical area regulations in 2020 would be incorporated by reference. Shoreline Master Program Rules, WAC 173-26-090: (1) Locally initiated master program review. Each local government should review its shoreline master program and make amendments deemed necessary DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report 6 to reflect changing local circumstances, new information or improved data. Local governments are encouraged to consult department guidance for applicable new information on emerging topics such as sea level rise. Evaluation of WAC 173-26-090: The Jefferson County SMP Periodic Review amendments were reviewed for changing circumstances, new information, or emerging topics (e.g. through Task Force review, and an evaluation of permit histories). For example, the County’s track record of producing the most shoreline conditional use permits and variances for certain permit types (single family homes and others) was new information. Changing circumstances and emerging topics included sea level rise. Jefferson County Code criteria, 18.45.080 final docket for Comprehensive Plan: (1) Planning Commission Review. All proposed amendments on the final docket shall be reviewed and assessed by the planning commission, which shall make a recommendation to the board of county commissioners after holding at least one open record public hearing. (b) Required Findings – Generally. For all proposed amendments, the planning commission shall develop findings and conclusions and a recommendation which consider the growth management indicators set forth in JCC 18.45.050(4)(b)(i) through (4)(b)(vii), as well as the following: (i) Whether circumstances related to the proposed amendment and/or the area in which it is located have substantially changed since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan; (ii) Whether the assumptions upon which the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan is based are no longer valid, or whether new information is available which was not considered during the adoption process or any annual amendments of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan; and (iii) Whether the proposed amendment reflects current widely held values of the residents of Jefferson County. Evaluation of JCC 18.45.080: The SMP goals and policies are considered an element of the County’s comprehensive plan and the SMP regulations are considered part of the County’s development regulations. They can be amended more than once a year and are not part of the annual docket of Comprehensive Plan changes. Regardless, a review of the docket criteria is made. • Circumstances have changed including experience with the 2014 SMP implementation permit process results. Through application of the SMP the County found some inconsistencies and need for interpretation. • Assumptions have changed and new information was available such as adoption of the County Comprehensive Plan in 2018, and new state laws. • Amendments have been proposed based on the various SMP public outreach results. Regarding the SMP draft amendments, a SEPA checklist has been developed to screen the legislative proposals for environmental implications. The proposed SMP amendments are meant to increase consistency with state laws and reflect local circumstances, while retaining no-net-loss of shoreline ecological function. No adverse environmental impacts requiring mitigation above and beyond existing or DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report 7 amended code provisions has been identified. At the time of a site-specific development proposal within shoreline jurisdiction, mitigation may be necessary and may be imposed. The checklist is available under separate cover. See the project website: https://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/1481/Shoreline-Master- Program-Periodic-Review#. Appendices SMP Amendment Code Excerpts SMP Periodic Review Survey Task Force Scoping Report Periodic Review Checklist Periodic Review Proposed Changes DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report A. SMP Amendment Laws and Rules RCW 90.58.080 Timetable for local governments to develop or amend master programs—Review of master programs—Grants. (Effective until July 1, 2025.) (1) Local governments shall develop or amend a master program for regulation of uses of the shorelines of the state consistent with the required elements of the guidelines adopted by the department in accordance with the schedule established by this section. (2)(a) Subject to the provisions of subsections (5) and (6) of this section, each local government subject to this chapter shall develop or amend its master program for the regulation of uses of shorelines within its jurisdiction according to the following schedule: (i) On or before December 1, 2005, for the city of Port Townsend, the city of Bellingham, the city of Everett, Snohomish county, and Whatcom county; (ii) On or before December 1, 2009, for King county and the cities within King county greater in population than ten thousand; (iii) Except as provided by (a)(i) and (ii) of this subsection, on or before December 1, 2011, for Clallam, Clark, Jefferson, King, Kitsap, Pierce, Snohomish, Thurston, and Whatcom counties and the cities within those counties; (iv) On or before December 1, 2012, for Cowlitz, Island, Lewis, Mason, San Juan, Skagit, and Skamania counties and the cities within those counties; (v) On or before December 1, 2013, for Benton, Chelan, Douglas, Grant, Kittitas, Spokane, and Yakima counties and the cities within those counties; and (vi) On or before December 1, 2014, for Adams, Asotin, Columbia, Ferry, Franklin, Garfield, Grays Harbor, Klickitat, Lincoln, Okanogan, Pacific, Pend Oreille, Stevens, Wahkiakum, Walla Walla, and Whitman counties and the cities within those counties. (b) Nothing in this subsection (2) shall preclude a local government from developing or amending its master program prior to the dates established by this subsection (2). (3)(a) Following approval by the department of a new or amended master program, local governments required to develop or amend master programs on or before December 1, 2009, as provided by subsection (2)(a)(i) and (ii) of this section, shall be deemed to have complied with the schedule established by subsection (2)(a)(iii) of this section and shall not be required to complete master program amendments until the applicable dates established by subsection (4)(b) of this section. Any jurisdiction listed in subsection (2)(a)(i) of this section that has a new or amended master program approved by the department on or after March 1, 2002, but before July 27, 2003, shall not be required to complete master program amendments until the applicable date provided by subsection (4)(b) of this section. (b) Following approval by the department of a new or amended master program, local governments choosing to develop or amend master programs on or before December 1, 2009, shall be deemed to have complied with the schedule established by subsection (2)(a)(iii) through (vi) of this section and shall not be required to complete master program amendments until the applicable dates established by subsection (4)(b) of this section. DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report (4)(a) Following the updates required by subsection (2) of this section, local governments shall conduct a review of their master programs at least once every eight years as required by (b) of this subsection. Following the review required by this subsection (4), local governments shall, if necessary, revise their master programs. The purpose of the review is: (i) To assure that the master program complies with applicable law and guidelines in effect at the time of the review; and (ii) To assure consistency of the master program with the local government's comprehensive plan and development regulations adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, if applicable, and other local requirements. (b) Counties and cities shall take action to review and, if necessary, revise their master programs as required by (a) of this subsection as follows: (i) On or before June 30, 2019, and every eight years thereafter, for King, Pierce, and Snohomish counties and the cities within those counties; (ii) On or before June 30, 2020, and every eight years thereafter, for Clallam, Clark, Island, Jefferson, Kitsap, Mason, San Juan, Skagit, Thurston, and Whatcom counties and the cities within those counties; (iii) On or before June 30, 2021, and every eight years thereafter, for Benton, Chelan, Cowlitz, Douglas, Grant, Kittitas, Lewis, Skamania, Spokane, and Yakima counties and the cities within those counties; and (iv) On or before June 30, 2022, and every eight years thereafter, for Adams, Asotin, Columbia, Ferry, Franklin, Garfield, Grant, Grays Harbor, Klickitat, Lincoln, Okanogan, Pacific, Pend Oreille, Stevens, Wahkiakum, Walla Walla, and Whitman counties and the cities within those counties. (5) In meeting the update requirements of subsection (2) of this section, local governments are encouraged to begin the process of developing or amending their master programs early and are eligible for grants from the department as provided by RCW 90.58.250, subject to available funding. Except for those local governments listed in subsection (2)(a)(i) and (ii) of this section, the deadline for completion of the new or amended master programs shall be two years after the date the grant is approved by the department. Subsequent master program review dates shall not be altered by the provisions of this subsection. (6) In meeting the update requirements of subsection (2) of this section, the following shall apply: (a) Grants to local governments for developing and amending master programs pursuant to the schedule established by this section shall be provided at least two years before the adoption dates specified in subsection (2) of this section. To the extent possible, the department shall allocate grants within the amount appropriated for such purposes to provide reasonable and adequate funding to local governments that have indicated their intent to develop or amend master programs during the biennium according to the schedule established by subsection (2) of this section. Any local government that applies for but does not receive funding to comply with the provisions of subsection (2) of this section may delay the development or amendment of its master program until the following biennium. (b) Local governments with delayed compliance dates as provided in (a) of this subsection shall be the first priority for funding in subsequent biennia, and the development or amendment compliance deadline for those local governments shall be two years after the date of grant approval. DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report (c) Failure of the local government to apply in a timely manner for a master program development or amendment grant in accordance with the requirements of the department shall not be considered a delay resulting from the provisions of (a) of this subsection. (7) In meeting the update requirements of subsection (2) of this section, all local governments subject to the requirements of this chapter that have not developed or amended master programs on or after March 1, 2002, shall, no later than December 1, 2014, develop or amend their master programs to comply with guidelines adopted by the department after January 1, 2003. (8) In meeting the update requirements of subsection (2) of this section, local governments may be provided an additional year beyond the deadlines in this section to complete their master program or amendment. The department shall grant the request if it determines that the local government is likely to adopt or amend its master program within the additional year. WAC 173-26-090 Locally initiated review—Periodic review—Public involvement and approval procedures. (1) Locally initiated master program review. Each local government should review its shoreline master program and make amendments deemed necessary to reflect changing local circumstances, new information or improved data. Local governments are encouraged to consult department guidance for applicable new information on emerging topics such as sea level rise. (2) Periodic review requirements. (a) Following the comprehensive updates required by RCW 90.58.080(2), each local government shall conduct a review of their master program at least once every eight years on a schedule established in the act. Following the review, local governments shall, if necessary, revise their master programs. This review and revision is referred to in this section as the periodic review. (b) Deadlines for periodic review. Local governments must take action to review, and if necessary, revise their master programs according to the schedule established in RCW 90.58.080 (4)(b). Deadlines for completion of periodic review are as follows: Table WAC 173-26-090.1 Deadlines for Completion of Periodic Review Reviews must be completed on or before June 30th of: Affected counties and the cities and towns within: 2019/2027* King, Pierce, Snohomish. 2020/2028* Clallam, Clark, Island, Jefferson, Kitsap, Mason, San Juan, Skagit, Thurston, Whatcom. 2021/2029* Benton, Chelan, Cowlitz, Douglas, Kittitas, Lewis, Skamania, Spokane, Yakima. 2022/2030* Adams, Asotin, Columbia, Ferry, Franklin, Garfield, Grant, Grays Harbor, Klickitat, Lincoln, Okanogan, Pacific, Pend Oreille, Stevens, Wahkiakum, Walla Walla, Whitman. DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report * And every eight years thereafter. (c) Taking legislative action. (i) The periodic review must be accomplished through legislative action. Legislative action means the adoption of a resolution, motion, or ordinance following notice and a public hearing including, at a minimum, findings that a review and evaluation has occurred and identifying the revisions made, or that a revision was not needed and the reasons therefore. Legislative findings that no revisions are needed are referred to in this section as "findings of adequacy." (ii) Legislative action includes two components. It includes a review of the shoreline master program and it includes the adoption of either findings of adequacy or any amendments necessary to bring the program into compliance with the requirements of the act. (iii) Legislative actions concluding the periodic review must be followed by department approval. (d) The required minimum scope of review. (i) The purpose and scope of the periodic review as established by the act is: (A) To assure that the master program complies with applicable law and guidelines in effect at the time of the review; and (B) To assure consistency of the master program with the local government's comprehensive plan and development regulations adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW, if applicable, and other local requirements. (ii) The review process provides the method for bringing shoreline master programs into compliance with the requirements of the act that have been added or changed since the last review and for responding to changes in guidelines adopted by the department, together with a review for consistency with amended comprehensive plans and regulations. Local governments should also incorporate amendments to reflect changed circumstances, new information, or improved data. The review ensures that shoreline master programs do not fall out of compliance over time through inaction. (iii) The periodic review is distinct from the comprehensive updates required by RCW 90.58.080(2). The presumption in the comprehensive update process was that all master programs needed to be revised to comply with the full suite of ecology guidelines. By contrast, the periodic review addresses changes in requirements of the act and guidelines requirements since the comprehensive update or the last periodic review, and changes for consistency with revised comprehensive plans and regulations, together with any changes deemed necessary to reflect changed circumstances, new information or improved data. There is no minimum requirement to comprehensively revise shoreline inventory and characterization reports or restoration plans. (3) Procedures for conducting periodic reviews. (a) Public participation program. (i) In conducting the periodic review, the department and local governments, pursuant to RCW 90.58.130, shall make all reasonable efforts to inform, fully involve and encourage participation of all interested persons and private entities, tribes, and agencies of the federal, state or local government having interests and responsibilities relating to shorelines of the state and the local master program. Local governments may follow the public participation procedures under either the standard local process outlined in WAC 173-26-100, or the optional joint review process outlined in WAC 173-26-104. (ii) Counties and cities shall establish and broadly disseminate to the public a public participation program identifying procedures whereby review of the shoreline master program will be considered by the local governing body consistent with RCW 36.70A.140. Such procedures shall provide for early and continuous public participation through broad dissemination of informative materials, proposals and alternatives, opportunity for written comments, public meetings after effective notice, provision for open discussion, and consideration of and response to public comments. The public participation program should include a schedule for the periodic review and identify when legislative action on the review and update component are proposed to occur. The public participation program should also inform the public of when to comment on the scope of the review and proposed changes to the master program. Counties and cities may adjust the public participation program to best meet the intent of the participation requirement. DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report (b) Review and analysis to determine need for revisions. (i) Review amendments to the act and shoreline master program guidelines. Local governments must review amendments to chapter 90.58 RCW and department guidelines that have occurred since the master program was last amended, and determine if local amendments are needed to maintain compliance. The department will maintain a checklist of legislative and rule amendments to assist local governments with this review. The department will provide technical assistance to ensure local governments address applicable changes to the act and master program guidelines. (ii) Review relevant comprehensive plans and regulations. Local governments must review changes to the comprehensive plan and development regulations to determine if the shoreline master program policies and regulations remain consistent with them. WAC 173-26-191 (1)(e) and 173-26-211(3) provide guidance on determining internal consistency. It is the responsibility of the local government to assure consistency between the master program and other elements of the comprehensive plan and development regulations. Local governments should document the consistency analysis to support proposed changes. (iii) Additional review and analysis. Local governments should consider during their periodic review whether to incorporate any amendments needed to reflect changed circumstances, new information or improved data as described under subsection (1) of this section. Local governments should consider whether the significance of the changed circumstances, new information or improved data warrants amendments. (c) Take legislative action. (i) At the end of the review process, counties and cities must take legislative action declaring the review process complete. (ii) The notice of hearing for legislative actions that are intended to address the periodic review process must state that the actions to be considered are part of the periodic review process under RCW 90.58.080(4). (iii) The findings for any legislative action on the periodic review process must state that the action is intended to satisfy the requirements of RCW 90.58.080(4). (iv) A local government that determines after review that amendments are not needed shall adopt a resolution, motion, or ordinance declaring findings of adequacy. Findings of adequacy are a local written determination that no revisions to a shoreline master program are needed to comply with the requirements of RCW 90.58.080(4). (d) Submittal to the department. (i) A local government that determines amendments are needed shall submit the amendments to the department consistent with WAC 173-26-110. (ii) A local government that determines amendments are not needed shall submit the following in lieu of the requirements of WAC 173-26-110: (A) A resolution or ordinance declaring findings of adequacy. (B) Evidence of compliance with applicable public notice and consultation requirements. (C) Copies of all public, agency and tribal comments received during any applicable public comment periods, or where no comments have been received, a statement to that effect. (D) A completed checklist demonstrating review elements have been considered, and are either inapplicable or have already been addressed through previous locally initiated amendments prior to the scheduled periodic review. (e) State process for approving periodic reviews. (i) The department must issue a formal approval of any amendment or findings of adequacy. Department approval is necessary to affirmatively conclude the periodic review process, to confirm that state review of local action has occurred, and to establish a definitive appeal window consistent with RCW 90.58.190. (ii) Where the local government final action includes master program amendments, local governments and the department shall follow applicable adoption procedures described in WAC 173- 26-120. DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report (iii) Where the local government final action is to adopt findings of adequacy, the department shall follow applicable adoption procedures described in WAC 173-26-120. The department shall review the findings of adequacy solely for consistency with RCW 90.58.080(4) and this section. 18.45.030 Exceptions to the annual amendment process. (1) Exceptions – Emergencies. In addition to the amendment process set forth in this chapter, the board of county commissioners may amend the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan in any of the following circumstances: (a) Resolution of an emergency condition or situation that involves public health, safety or welfare and when adherence to the amendment process set forth in this chapter would be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare; (b) Initial adoption of a subarea plan identified in the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan; (c) The adoption of or amendments to the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program; (d) Technical, nonsubstantive corrections to manifest land use mapping errors which do not involve interpretations of the criteria for the various land use designations contained in the Comprehensive Plan; (e) Resolution of a decision by an administrative agency or court of competent jurisdiction; and (f) Special use permits for essential public facilities under JCC 18.15.110. 18.45.080 Final docket (1) Planning Commission Review. All proposed amendments on the final docket shall be reviewed and assessed by the planning commission, which shall make a recommendation to the board of county commissioners after holding at least one open record public hearing. (b) Required Findings – Generally. For all proposed amendments, the planning commission shall develop findings and conclusions and a recommendation which consider the growth management indicators set forth in JCC 18.45.050(4)(b)(i) through (4)(b)(vii), as well as the following: (i) Whether circumstances related to the proposed amendment and/or the area in which it is located have substantially changed since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan; (ii) Whether the assumptions upon which the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan is based are no longer valid, or whether new information is available which was not considered during the adoption process or any annual amendments of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan; and (iii) Whether the proposed amendment reflects current widely held values of the residents of Jefferson County. DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report 18.25.840 Master program amendments. Pursuant to RCW 90.58.190 and 36.70A.280, a decision by the Jefferson County board of county commissioners to amend this master program shall not constitute a final appealable decision until the Department of Ecology has made a decision to approve, reject, or modify the proposed amendment. Following the decision of the Department of Ecology regarding the proposed amendment, the decision may be appealed to the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board. DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report B. SMP Periodic Review Survey DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Update Jefferson County is conducting a periodic review of its 2014 Shoreline Master Program (SMP) as required by state law. The SMP applies to all marine waters, lakes over 20 acres, and larger streams (over 20 cubic feet per second) as well as associated wetlands and uplands at least 200 feet from the shoreline. This project will focus on revisions needed for fine-tuning and house-keeping, not a complete rewrite. Please help guide this project by providing your input to the following questions. Skip any that do not apply to you. Question Title 1. What is your relationship to Jefferson County Shorelines? (Check all that apply) I recreate along shorelines (e.g. walk beaches or trails, camp near shorelines, etc.). I boat or fish on Jefferson County shorelines. I have a business dependent on Jefferson County shorelines (e.g. marina, aquaculture, etc.). I own, rent or have access to, property within 200 feet of a Jefferson County Shoreline waterbody? If yes, name all that apply: Other (please specify) Question Title 2. If you own, rent, or have access to property within 200 feet of Jefferson County Shoreline waterbody, please name all waterbodies that apply (for example: Fulton Creek, Discovery Bay, etc.): Marine Lake River/Creek/Stream Questions #3-8: For Recent Permit Applicants Question Title 3. Have you inquired about, applied for, or been issued a Jefferson County shoreline permit since 2014? If yes, which type or permit (select one and describe the type of development): Building Permit Exemption DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report Conditional Use Permit Substantial Development Permit Question Title 4. Were there any barriers you ran into when attempting to permit a project in a Shoreline area? Were the barriers financial, regulatory, or other? (describe) Question Title 5. When presented with the SMP Regulations, were you able to easily comprehend the intent of the regulations, and did you clearly understand the permitting process? Question Title 6. Did you fully understand what was expected from you (i.e. applications, reports, fees) and the reasons for certain requirements such as special reports? DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report Question Title 7. Could you easily get your questions answered in a meaningful and timely manner? (describe) Question Title 8. If you answered questions #4-7, what could be done to improve the regulations, process, etc? General Questions Question Title 9. The state Shoreline Management Act requires local SMPs to balance three goals: Use & Development, Public Access, and Resource Protection along our local shorelines of the state. Which of the following SMP Governing Principles do you support (select all that apply): Ensuring local regulations are consistent with state laws & rules Achieving local planning policies through both regulatory & non-regulatory means Avoiding unconstitutional infringement upon and taking of private property rights Applying SMP regulations only to shoreline areas & applying SMP planning functions more broadly across watersheds Protect shoreline ecological functions Other (please specify) DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report Question Title 10. What types of use and development activities would you like to see maintained and/or increased in the Shoreline? (select all that apply): Public access to the shoreline (visual and/or physical) Private access to the shoreline (stairs to the beach) Commercial development Education opportunities Underwater dive parks Docks, boat ramps, mooring buoys, marinas, etc. Residential development Aquaculture (shellfish, finfish) Fishing, crabbing, and shrimping Marine Trades (boat building and repair, etc.) Water quality Other (please specify) Question Title 11. Are there any sections of the SMP or specific provisions that you think the County needs to revise? (describe) DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report Question Title 12. Are there any changes to local circumstance, new information, or improved data the County needs to consider regarding the SMP? (describe) Question Title 13. Is there anything else you would like to share about the SMP Periodic review? Thank you for your time! For more information about the SMP Periodic Review, please see the project website https://www.jeffersoncountypublichealth.org/1481/Shoreline-Master- Program-Periodic-Review. For questions or to sign up to be notified of SMP Periodic Review events, please contact: David Wayne Johnson, Associate Planner, Long Range Planning dwjohnson@co.jefferson.wa.us 360-379-4465 Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Update 1 / 18 86.02%80 55.91%52 4.30%4 63.44%59 11.83%11 Q1 What is your relationship to Jefferson County Shorelines? (Check all that apply) Answered: 93 Sk ipped: 0 Total Respondents : 93 #OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE 1 Skok omish Indian Tribe Us ual and Accus tomed (U&A) gathering, fis hing and hunting grounds .1/16/2021 11:33 AM 2 Marine trades business and working waterfront is needed for non t ours ium busines s 10/5/2020 11:32 AM 3 Duc k abush flats 10/2/2020 5:25 PM 4 Eac h rights 10/2/2020 2:35 PM 5 I care deeply for marine wildlife and their natural habitat 10/1/2020 7:16 PM 6 Admiralty 1 Condominiums in Port Ludlow MPR 10/1/2020 10:55 AM 7 I do volunteer beach surveys for various organiz ations.9/30/2020 11:01 AM 8 Own 9/30/2020 9:43 AM 9 I work in support of a wat er dependent industry.9/30/2020 5:31 AM 10 Fis herman Harbor 9/29/2020 6:48 AM I recreat e along... I boat or fish on Jefferson... I have a business... I ow n, r ent or have access ... Other (please specify) 0%10%20%30%40%5 0%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES I rec reate along s horelines (e.g. walk beaches or trails, camp near s horelines , et c.). I boat or fish on J efferson County shorelines. I have a business dependent on J effers on County s horelines (e.g. marina, aquaculture, etc.). I own, rent or hav e ac c ess to, property within 200 feet of a J efferson County Shoreline waterbody? If yes, name all that apply : Other (please s pecify) Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Update 2 / 18 11 I am a member of the Leadership Counc il of the Puget Sound Partnership 9/28/2020 7:13 PM Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Update 3 / 18 98.39%61 4.84%3 9.68%6 Q2 If you own, rent, or have access to property within 200 feet of Jefferson County Shoreline waterbody, please name all waterbodies that apply (for example: Fulton Creek, Discovery Bay, etc.): Answered: 62 Sk ipped: 31 #MARINE DATE 1 Waters of Hood Canal within Jeffers on County s outh of Foulweather Bluf f 1/16/2021 11:33 AM 2 Ludlow Bay, Shine State Park 11/28/2020 11:44 AM 3 Hood Canal 11/8/2020 11:05 AM 4 Dis covery Bay 10/19/2020 12:44 PM 5 Dabob Bay /Hood Canal 10/18/2020 4:01 PM 6 Kilis uit Harbor and Admiralty Inlet/Puget Sound 10/12/2020 7:42 AM 7 Dabob Bay 10/8/2020 9:05 AM 8 Hood Canal 10/6/2020 4:59 PM 9 Kilis ut Harbor 10/6/2020 12:39 PM 10 oak bay 10/6/2020 11:39 AM 11 Dabob Bay 10/4/2020 4:57 PM 12 Pleasant Harbor 10/3/2020 7:50 PM 13 Ludlow Bay 10/3/2020 5:14 PM 14 Dis covery Bay 10/3/2020 12:27 PM 15 Dabob bay 10/3/2020 11:41 AM 16 Hood Canal 10/3/2020 10:24 AM 17 Dabob Bay 10/3/2020 8:54 AM 18 Dabob Bay 10/3/2020 5:35 AM 19 hood canal trac ts 10/2/2020 9:03 PM 20 Hood Canal- c edar cov e 10/2/2020 8:34 PM 21 Area 12 10/2/2020 8:16 PM 22 Dos ewallips tidelands 10/2/2020 7:39 PM 23 Hood canal 10/2/2020 6:48 PM 24 Admiralty Inlet 10/2/2020 6:43 PM 25 A bay 10/2/2020 6:43 PM 26 Jackson Cov e 10/2/2020 5:35 PM ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Marine Lake Riv er/Creek /Stream Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Update 4 / 18 27 Hood Canal, Duckabus h flats 10/2/2020 5:25 PM 28 Hood Canal 10/2/2020 5:20 PM 29 Ludlow Bay 10/2/2020 3:50 PM 30 Adjacent to Trit on beach 10/2/2020 2:35 PM 31 Port Ludlow Cov e 10/1/2020 7:16 PM 32 Port Ludlow area 10/1/2020 3:07 PM 33 Port Ludlow inner harbor, behind the Twin Is lands 10/1/2020 2:13 PM 34 Port Ludlow Bay (Puget Sound)10/1/2020 10:55 AM 35 Hood Canal 10/1/2020 10:27 AM 36 Port Ludlow Bay 9/30/2020 2:15 PM 37 Quilc ene Bay I own tidelands 9/30/2020 11:53 AM 38 Dabob Bay 9/30/2020 11:01 AM 39 Port Ludlow Bay 9/30/2020 9:48 AM 40 Ludlow bay 9/30/2020 9:43 AM 41 Salish Sea 9/30/2020 9:30 AM 42 Ludlow Bay 9/30/2020 9:29 AM 43 Port Ludlow 9/30/2020 9:08 AM 44 Fis herman's Harbor and Hood Canal 9/30/2020 7:57 AM 45 Port Ludlow Bay 9/30/2020 7:50 AM 46 Hood canal 9/30/2020 6:38 AM 47 Da’bob Bay 9/30/2020 5:31 AM 48 Fis herman’s Harbor 9/29/2020 7:11 PM 49 Hood canal 9/29/2020 6:36 PM 50 Admiralty Inlet 9/29/2020 5:36 PM 51 Hood Canal 9/29/2020 4:18 PM 52 Hood Canal 9/29/2020 4:16 PM 53 Hood Canal 9/29/2020 3:30 PM 54 Ludlow Cove 9/29/2020 9:39 AM 55 HoodCanal 9/29/2020 7:36 AM 56 Fis herman Harbor 9/29/2020 6:48 AM 57 Hood Canal 9/28/2020 9:55 PM 58 Dabob Bay 9/28/2020 9:13 PM 59 Ludlow Bay and assoc iated es tuary and streams flowing into the Bay in front of my home.9/28/2020 7:13 PM 60 Port Ludlow Cov e 9/28/2020 12:51 PM 61 Slip Boat Haven Marina, Port Townsend Bay, Strait of J uan de Fuc a 9/28/2020 8:54 AM #LAKE DATE 1 All wetlands , ponds , and lak es draining into Hood Canal f rom Jefferson County 1/16/2021 11:33 AM 2 Anderson, Gibbs 11/28/2020 11:44 AM Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Update 5 / 18 3 Lake Leland 750' of shore line 9/30/2020 11:53 AM #RIVER/CREEK/STREAM DATE 1 All creek s, streams and rivers draining into Hood Canal from J eff ers on County 1/16/2021 11:33 AM 2 Chimac um, Ludlow 11/28/2020 11:44 AM 3 Petitjean Creek (aka Jesse Allen Creek )10/7/2020 8:34 PM 4 Duc k abush river 10/3/2020 10:24 AM 5 Leland Creek 9/30/2020 11:53 AM 6 Port Ludlow Creek 9/28/2020 12:51 PM Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Update 6 / 18 72.73%8 54.55%6 63.64%7 Q3 Have you inquired about, applied for, or been issued a Jefferson County shoreline permit since 2014? If yes, which type or permit (select one and describe the type of development): Answered: 11 Sk ipped: 82 #BUILDING PERMI T EXEMPTION DATE 1 no 11/28/2020 11:44 AM 2 No 11/8/2020 11:05 AM 3 Building Permit to replace a garage des troyed by fire 10/4/2020 4:57 PM 4 NA 10/3/2020 7:50 PM 5 Res ident ial c onstruction 10/2/2020 8:16 PM 6 yes , on Lake Leland a home near the water 9/30/2020 11:53 AM 7 No.9/30/2020 9:48 AM 8 No 9/28/2020 12:51 PM #CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DATE 1 no 11/28/2020 11:44 AM 2 No 11/8/2020 11:05 AM 3 NA 10/3/2020 7:50 PM 4 Building s omething 10/2/2020 6:43 PM 5 No.9/30/2020 9:48 AM 6 No 9/28/2020 12:51 PM #SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT DATE 1 Shellfis h aquac ulture project Dabob Bay DNR Lease 20-1000212 1/16/2021 11:33 AM 2 no 11/28/2020 11:44 AM 3 No 11/8/2020 11:05 AM 4 NA 10/3/2020 7:50 PM 5 Exemption t o replace exis ting walk way wall along s horeline of Port Ludlow Bay 10/1/2020 10:55 AM 6 No.9/30/2020 9:48 AM 7 No 9/28/2020 12:51 PM ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Building Permit Ex emption Conditional Use Permit Subs tantial Development Permit Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Update 7 / 18 Q4 Were there any barriers you ran into when attempting to permit a project in a Shoreline area? Were the barriers financial, regulatory, or other? (describe) Answered: 12 Sk ipped: 81 #RESPONSES DATE 1 Permit ting in process.1/16/2021 11:33 AM 2 no 11/28/2020 11:44 AM 3 N/A 11/8/2020 11:05 AM 4 Sev eral y ears ago, when my c ontract or ask ed about a permit to build a stairway t o my beach (50'cliff) I was told it was not allowed. Two y ears later, the owners 3 houses north of me built a stairway with a contrac tor. Others along Oak Bay hav e also built. One owner said it cos t $4,000 in legal fees to get the permit. Does this mean only the wealthy can get a permit ? 10/6/2020 11:39 AM 5 The building permit would not be is s ued until the s eptic s y s tem was profes sionally inspected.10/4/2020 4:57 PM 6 Yes, Setback rules,10/2/2020 8:16 PM 7 Yes! It was insane confusing, c os tly and far far more c omplic ated than it s hould hav e been. Staff was combativ e and obstructive. They had no idea what they were doing. 10/2/2020 6:43 PM 8 No. The permit application proces s was s traightforward and permit was is s ued promptly.10/1/2020 10:55 AM 9 Yes, I will be fighting the setbacks from a stream, that has a road next to it, but yet I have to be 125' + from it. This makes no sens e at all. 9/30/2020 11:53 AM 10 N/A 9/30/2020 9:48 AM 11 Did not apply for permit when I cons idered remov al a non-nativ e tree. The reason did not follow through was the permit fee and the requirement for an engineer report . The cost to remov e a dis eas ed Spruce tree wasn't worth the ef fort . 9/29/2020 5:36 PM 12 Well, I don't understand why I c annot build a s tairc ase to reach the water (this staircas e would be s afe f or t he environment ) becaus e of environment c oncerns while jus t in front of my house in the c ov e and in the water, I s ee old tires , rubber pipe and rusty s teel c ables . Why is the county not cleaning up that mess firs t? 9/28/2020 12:51 PM Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Update 8 / 18 Q5 When presented with the SMP Regulations, were you able to easily comprehend the intent of the regulations, and did you clearly understand the permitting process? Answered: 9 Sk ipped: 84 #RESPONSES DATE 1 Yes 1/16/2021 11:33 AM 2 N/A 11/8/2020 11:05 AM 3 No 10/6/2020 11:39 AM 4 No, there was no logical reason to require a septic system inspec tion to rebuild a garage that has zero connectivity to the septic system. 10/4/2020 4:57 PM 5 No 10/2/2020 8:16 PM 6 No. We had t o pay professionals a lot of money to unwind and interpret t hat unholy mes s. No lay pers on can pos s ibly nav igate it . The DCD st aff kept c hanging t heir minds about what it meant and kept c hanging people we had to work with also. It was horrible. 10/2/2020 6:43 PM 7 yes, s omewhat 9/30/2020 11:53 AM 8 N/A 9/30/2020 9:48 AM 9 Yes, the regulations and es pecially the interac tive maps were very helpful.9/29/2020 5:36 PM Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Update 9 / 18 Q6 Did you fully understand what was expected from you (i.e. applications, reports, fees) and the reasons for certain requirements such as special reports? Answered: 9 Sk ipped: 84 #RESPONSES DATE 1 Yes so far.1/16/2021 11:33 AM 2 N/A 11/8/2020 11:05 AM 3 My contractor was a profes s ional.10/6/2020 11:39 AM 4 no 10/5/2020 11:32 AM 5 Understood but did not agree with this illogical requirement.10/4/2020 4:57 PM 6 No 10/2/2020 8:16 PM 7 NO!10/2/2020 6:43 PM 8 Yes, but they were not reas onable 9/30/2020 11:53 AM 9 Yes, although such requirements for removing a non-nat ive dis eased tree from a heavily wooded area seems drac onian. There s hould be some way for exceptions to be c onsidered on the regulations. 9/29/2020 5:36 PM Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Update 10 / 18 Q7 Could you easily get your questions answered in a meaningful and timely manner? (describe) Answered: 10 Sk ipped: 83 #RESPONSES DATE 1 Yes e-mails returned and phone calls ans wered. Kudos to staff.1/16/2021 11:33 AM 2 N/A 11/8/2020 11:05 AM 3 NO! was the meaningful and timely ans wer.10/6/2020 11:39 AM 4 no 10/5/2020 11:32 AM 5 The health departments answers were illogical and not met with any f oundation f or our situation. 10/4/2020 4:57 PM 6 No 10/2/2020 8:16 PM 7 NO!10/2/2020 6:43 PM 8 yes 9/30/2020 11:53 AM 9 N/A 9/29/2020 5:36 PM 10 Nope, pleas e s ee my comment in #4 above.9/28/2020 12:51 PM Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Update 11 / 18 Q8 If you answered questions #4-7, what could be done to improve the regulations, process, etc? Answered: 8 Sk ipped: 85 #RESPONSES DATE 1 Cross regulatory c hallenges created during last four y ears at fed, s tate, and local lev els . Sys temic to politic al dysfunction. 1/16/2021 11:33 AM 2 N/A 11/8/2020 11:05 AM 3 Mak e it t rans parent how to get a permit.10/6/2020 11:39 AM 4 Better public relations and t he s taff must k now the job before they are put in a pos it ion of authority. 10/5/2020 11:32 AM 5 Enc ourage county employ ees involved in the permitting process to use judgement when determining needed ac tions . Eac h permitting case is different and does n't ex ist under one umbrella. Als o, it would be appropriate for a county employee t o v isit the building site to better understand what is ac tually needed to go forward with the project . It cost us $2300 to permit a garage that was exactly duplic ated under the original permit as well as the expense f or t he unneces s ary septic inspect ion. 10/4/2020 4:57 PM 6 Eac h residential property that f alls under the SMP regulations are not one s ize fits all, Cons iderations should be given to property owners that hav e s pecial c ircumstanc es and also financial limit ations, 10/2/2020 8:16 PM 7 Simplify it. Hire c ompetent people and train them that their job is t o help and serv e propert y owners not discourage us and hide from us. Charging us every time we had ques tions is the opposite of s erv ing your cus tomers. 10/2/2020 6:43 PM 8 They need to make sens e f or t he c ircumstanc es.9/30/2020 11:53 AM Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Update 12 / 18 63.74%58 53.85%49 58.24%53 28.57%26 79.12%72 13.19%12 Q9 The state Shoreline Management Act requires local SMPs to balance three goals: Use & Development, Public Access, and Resource Protection along our local shorelines of the state. Which of the following SMP Governing Principles do you support (select all that apply): Answered: 91 Sk ipped: 2 Total Respondents : 91 #OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE 1 Protec tion of critic al habitat for s hellfish, forage fis h, and fin-fish/salmon recovery in protec tion of rights under Point No Point Treaty. 1/16/2021 11:33 AM 2 Allow for small boat (kayak , canoe) ac cess to undev eloped launch points along the shoreline, as possible. 11/8/2020 11:05 AM 3 work with res istant landowners to tak e bac k some areas that are now damaging shoreline protec tion. 10/6/2020 12:39 PM Ensur ing local regul ations ... Achieving local planni... Avoiding unconstit uti... Applying SM P regulat ions... Protect shorel ine... Other (please specify) 0%10%20%30%40%5 0%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Ensuring local regulations are cons istent with s tate laws & rules Achieving local planning polic ies through both regulatory & non-regulatory means Avoiding unc onstitutional infringement upon and tak ing of priv ate property rights Applying SMP regulations only to shoreline areas & applying SMP planning func tions more broadly ac ross watersheds Protec t shoreline ecological func tions Other (please s pecify) Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Update 13 / 18 4 remov e unes s ary blockages to ac c ess to our beaches. open all public right away s t o the waterfront 10/5/2020 11:32 AM 5 Not to be overly regulated 10/3/2020 7:50 PM 6 overall, citiz en opinions are ignored or made to feel like a terrible person for not being totally 'bought in' to the county's agenda. 10/2/2020 9:03 PM 7 Dis courage or prohibit commerc ial real es tate development along and adjacent to shoreline 10/2/2020 2:35 PM 8 Scientifically monitor ac tions to measure level of succes s at ac hiev ing defined objectives.9/30/2020 9:08 AM 9 protec t local longs tanding public access to shoreline outside of s tate law- community based access to walk 9/30/2020 8:48 AM 10 The County absolutely mus t prioritiz e non c ompliant mooring buoys. The c ounty charges f ees to t hose who choos e to do the right thing basic ally as an honor s y stem rather than adopting any compliance meas ures . It would be helpful t o map and pin known buoys such as Bainbridge did and jus t begin s omewhere. 9/30/2020 5:31 AM 11 prohibit inc ompatible uses 9/29/2020 9:55 PM 12 Enforc ement of polic ies and regulations whic h has been lacking in the county.9/28/2020 7:13 PM Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Update 14 / 18 Q10 What types of use and development activities would you like to see maintained and/or increased in the Shoreline? (select all that apply): Answered: 92 Sk ipped: 1 Publ ic access to the... Private access to t he... Commercial devel opment Educat ion o pportunities Under water dive par ks Docks, boat ramps, moori... Residential devel opment Aquaculture (shellfish,... Fishing, cr abbing, an... Marine Tr ades (boat buil di... Water quality Other (please specify) 0%10%20%30%40%5 0%60%70%80%90%100% Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Update 15 / 18 65.22%60 36.96%34 9.78%9 53.26%49 17.39%16 41.30%38 17.39%16 34.78%32 57.61%53 31.52%29 83.70%77 15.22%14 Total Respondents : 92 #OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE 1 No net loss of habitat.1/16/2021 11:33 AM 2 Public boat ramps and mooring buoys 10/12/2020 7:42 AM 3 Shellfis h 10/9/2020 4:23 PM 4 Shorelines must be protec ted f or f uture shoreline uses. You c annot c atch salmon 200 f t. inland. You c an't launch a boat 200 ft. inland. Residential and non-marine uses s hould be important but s ec ondary 10/6/2020 12:39 PM 5 Garbage cleanup 10/3/2020 10:32 AM 6 Please accept the hard reality that the long time domination by the tribes on the fisheries is one of the largest negatives when it comes to fish and shell fish populations. The eff orts in the past and present and project s for the future will likely have z ero t o v ery little improv ement in the fis h and shell fish. 10/2/2020 9:03 PM 7 Clarificat ion of national marit ime laws (which were never rat ified by WA) with res pect to beach access (i.e. walking below mean high tide) 10/2/2020 6:43 PM 8 Common s ense. How about s ome of that.10/2/2020 6:43 PM 9 Hi 10/2/2020 5:35 PM 10 Inc reas ed Protection not development of the shoreline 10/2/2020 3:32 PM 11 Preservation and res torat ion of natural habitats for salmon and other aquatics 10/1/2020 7:16 PM 12 rec reational clamming 9/30/2020 9:08 AM 13 maintain wildness of the s horeline for wildlife, for aesthetics, for ec ology, for walk ing 9/30/2020 8:48 AM 14 Maintaining the ec os y stem functions of s horelines , associated wetlands and streams.9/28/2020 7:13 PM ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Public acces s to the shoreline (v isual and/or physic al) Private access to the shoreline (s tairs to the beach) Commerc ial dev elopment Educ ation opportunities Underwater dive parks Dock s , boat ramps, mooring buoy s , marinas, etc. Resident ial dev elopment Aquac ult ure (shellf ish, finfish) Fis hing, c rabbing, and s hrimping Marine Trades (boat building and repair, etc.) Water quality Other (please s pecify) Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Update 16 / 18 Q11 Are there any sections of the SMP or specific provisions that you think the County needs to revise? (describe) Answered: 16 Sk ipped: 77 #RESPONSES DATE 1 Will address with written c omments.1/16/2021 11:33 AM 2 Water quality and land prac tices that affect it 11/28/2020 11:44 AM 3 Permit ting proc ess for s ingle family res idence expans ion lateral t o the shoreline and inland of the ex isting building (s). Greater s pecific ity on what t he v alues and f unct ions are that each CUP etc . is trying to protec t and how eac h one will be mitigated and how the mit igation measure ac hieves t he s pecific stat ed goal. 10/12/2020 7:42 AM 4 Some earlier grandfathered uses might need rev iew t o protect the saltwater shoreline from climate change sealevel ris es. Sealev el ris e is already taking a toll and will s urely c ontinue. 10/6/2020 12:39 PM 5 Shoreline set -bac k requirements are ex c es siv e. Thes e requirements have diminished property values for people owning undev eloped parcels along the shoreline. The county s hould compensate property owners for their loss when set-bac k requirements have diminis hed their value. 10/4/2020 4:57 PM 6 Set back rev iew for building. Allow to build clos er t o water 10/3/2020 7:50 PM 7 If y ou own property / home on the shoreline, and it bec omes damaged by fire or storm, you should be able to rebuild that home. 10/3/2020 8:54 AM 8 Setback requirements s hould be rev iewed 10/2/2020 8:16 PM 9 Require any effluent from c ommercial aquaculture to be filtered 10/2/2020 2:35 PM 10 200 foot setback allowing repair of older s eptic systems allowing aerobic s eptic s y s tems (the state has wider view and more choices and appreciation of the impac t these s ystems can have) 10/1/2020 3:07 PM 11 If anything, I would lik e to mak e s ure t hat t he SMP prov isions are strict ly enforc ed by the County and State. 9/30/2020 2:15 PM 12 Setbacks from streams on a c as e by cas e bas is 9/30/2020 11:53 AM 13 Mooring buoy c ompliance. It’s way out of hand in every waterway.9/30/2020 5:31 AM 14 The county needs to be much c learer about the int erplay between critic al area protections and shoreline regulat ion and enf orc ement. 9/28/2020 7:13 PM 15 18.25.440 Aquaculture 5) n) (ii) Report any known bac teriological characteristics of fis h food used; I quest ioned this regulation when it was originally put in this sec tion. I t is very general and seems to have no purpose or direction or s tandard and nobody within t he County that would be able to determine if the numbers the reported complied or were reasonable. To me it sounds like it is bureaucratic "fluff " wit h no known purpose. Jus t a c ase of "let us as k them for this" though I don't k now why. 9/28/2020 8:30 AM 16 1) The aquac ulture us e regulations could us e a bit of tweek ing sinc e there appear to be inc ons istencies or confusing text in the program. 2) I t's not clear to me why industrial piers can be built in priority aquatic areas whereas residential piers and marinas cannot. 3) It's not c lear to me why fores t prac tices c an be permitted in natural areas . 4) More of a c uriosity rather than a problem, but has there been s ignificant int eres t in dev eloping underwat er parks in Jef ferson? I haven't seen many scuba div ers in the count y. 5) I don't unders tand why oil and gas transmis s ion lines can get C(d) permits in priority aquatic areas giv en the potential for dis as trous consequences if an underwater pipe starts leaking. 9/21/2020 3:14 PM Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Update 17 / 18 Q12 Are there any changes to local circumstance, new information, or improved data the County needs to consider regarding the SMP? (describe) Answered: 15 Sk ipped: 78 #RESPONSES DATE 1 Will address with written c omments.1/16/2021 11:33 AM 2 I wish we had more public marine waterfront .11/28/2020 11:44 AM 3 Effec ts of c lear c utting activ ities on downs tream ec ologies and ground water.10/8/2020 9:05 AM 4 Are y ou tracking s ealevel ris e? How and is that data online?10/6/2020 12:39 PM 5 None 10/3/2020 7:50 PM 6 Climate c hange is already impac ting the area and will continue to do s o, and should be inc orporat ed int o the SMP using Best Available Science, including sea lev el rise project ions . 10/3/2020 12:27 PM 7 Jefferson County appears to be the mos t res trictiv e County in c omparison to other counties .SMP regulations, 10/2/2020 8:16 PM 8 Put public bathroom fac ility at Rocky Brook falls 10/2/2020 2:35 PM 9 Water table changes due to c limate c hange. Assess t he impact of defores tation and development. Asses s the effect of runoff from housing and business. 10/1/2020 7:16 PM 10 Cons istent and not more res tric tiv e than state guidelines 10/1/2020 3:07 PM 11 Clarify the privat e boat anchoring ac c ess and policies for the c overed s horeline to prev ent neglec ted or abandoned boats from becoming a hazard and/or pollution source. Encourage near s horeline improvements that support improved runof f div ers ions to aid in estuary and sea gras s area health. 10/1/2020 2:13 PM 12 Fut ure impac ts of c limate c hange and associated s ea level ris e.9/30/2020 9:08 AM 13 Map mooring buoy s and any non compliant us es as well as approv ed / permitted uses. also any in application phas e(s ). 9/30/2020 5:31 AM 14 The county’s online maps of critic al areas are unclear.9/28/2020 7:13 PM 15 Is Ec ology or s ome other gov ernment or univers it y entity attempting to monitor t he consequenc es of the inadvertent releas e of At lantic s almon from netpens a number of y ears back? Are there any data for how well thes e fis h hav e s urvived and whether this spec ies has become establis hed in Jefferson County or adjacent counties ? 9/21/2020 3:14 PM Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Update 18 / 18 Q13 Is there anything else you would like to share about the SMP Periodic review? Answered: 16 Sk ipped: 77 #RESPONSES DATE 1 Will address with written c omments.1/16/2021 11:33 AM 2 Thank you for asking!11/28/2020 11:44 AM 3 The periodic rev iew should include strategies to improve public ac cess to t he s horeline and policies to integrate the Conservation Futures program to help ac hiev e public ac c es s goals . 10/12/2020 7:42 AM 4 Thank s f or t he s urv ey opportunity.10/6/2020 12:39 PM 5 A stairway to the beach inc reas es property v alue, and thus tax income for the county.10/6/2020 11:39 AM 6 None 10/3/2020 7:50 PM 7 The SMP needs to be more ac cessible to v iew. it is v ery hard to find and hard to understand.10/3/2020 8:54 AM 8 Appreciate Jeffers on County looking for feedbac k in regards to the SMP 10/2/2020 8:16 PM 9 My property is on a high-bank (60ft) "s oft" c liff ov erlooking admiralty inlet. What can the county do to help ret ard erosion? 10/2/2020 6:43 PM 10 Gone to far and need to dial it bac k with more flexibility 10/1/2020 3:07 PM 11 I am not at all knowledgeable about the SMP. Howev er, my conc ern is making s ure that older development, s uch as Admiralty 1 Condos , built in 1969 and built right up t o the tidelands, is able to maintain it's buildings, paths and stairs, walls , landscaping, etc. wit hout ex c essiv e expens e and hass le. "Grandfathering" the c omplex for necessary maint enance. 10/1/2020 10:55 AM 12 They should be reviewed more often than every eight years . Growth, development and tec hnology c hange s o fast that in eight years an SMP would be way out of date. 9/29/2020 4:16 PM 13 The county needs to budget for and enforc e shoreline and crit ical area regulations. That is currently woefully defic ient. 9/28/2020 7:13 PM 14 I would like to see bet ter access to public s horelines that do not have access. Speciffic ately in Port Ludlow particularly along Ludlow Bay Road. 9/28/2020 1:08 PM 15 Thank you.9/28/2020 8:54 AM 16 I was unable to find online t he map portfolio for the 2008 Shoreline inventory and characterization report. Are t hese res tric ted or if not, can the website where they c an be found be posted on the SMP rev iew page? 9/21/2020 3:14 PM DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report C. Task Force Scoping Results Summary Task Force Formation: Resolution Task Force Members: Arlene Alen, Planning Commission Member, District 1 Lorna Smith, Planning Commission Member, District 2 Richard Hull, Planning Commission Member, District 3 Cliff O’Brien – Port Ludlow Associates, Residential/Commercial Construction & Development Gordon King – Taylor Shellfish, Aquaculture Amy Leitman – Marine Surveys & Assessments, Marine Biologist Chris Kelley – Oceanographer, Aquaculture Brent Vadopalas – Citizen at large District 1, Aquaculture Phil Andrus – Citizen at large District 2, former County Planning Commissioner David Wilkinson – Climate Action Committee, Atmospheric Science Craig Durgan – Citizen at large District 3, PUD#1 Ron Rempel – Citizen at large District 2, Wildlife Biologist Task Force Meetings: The Task Force met five times between September and December 2020. Minutes HERE. Meeting Materials HERE. The Task Force reviewed permit histories, shoreline maps, early drafts of the periodic checklist, staff docket improvement items, and in-progress survey results. The Task Force identified SMP scoping topics designed to meet their charge to vision, consider the requirements of state law, staffing capacity, and resource allocation, and serve as a sounding board informing the Board of County Commissioners to consider possible revisions to the current SMP through the lens of regulatory reform (Resolution 17- 19). A scoping document was developed identifying the core of the scope beyond the periodic checklist and staff-developed code dockets to include the items in the table below. Exhibit 2. SMP Task Force Scoping Topics Table Item Topic Description of SMP Review Element/Approach A Review Conditional Use Permits and Variance Permits for Proper Level of Review Maintain protective standards to achieve no-net-loss of shoreline ecological function, but reduce unnecessary CUPs/variances. Potentially adjust administrative versus discretionary CUPs. Examples include but are not limited to: existing single family home expansions and septic systems. B Mooring buoys Review permit type and standards for buoys compared to other shoreline facilities for boating. Consider where there are good locations for buoys. Review buoy standards versus anchoring, and unintended consequences of SMP regulations. Clarify permitting standards surrounding eelgrass beds, including differences between areas with eelgrass patches and full eelgrass coverage. Consider appropriate number or density of buoys. DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report Item Topic Description of SMP Review Element/Approach C Climate change and sea level rise Add in Comprehensive Plan climate policies. Plus, strive for consistency with Port Townsend’s SMP. Ensure that policies and permit standards do not limit projects that are proactively addressing projections in sea level rise due to climate change. Consider elevation, not just distance from the ordinary highwater mark, for shoreline permitting. D Marine trades and economic development Ensure SMP permitting process does not unduly burden marine trades. E Boat Launches Encourage development of new public boat launches and improvement of existing boat launches in SMP. F Shorelines of Statewide Significance Review how Shoreline Management Act purposes are carried out with use allowances and permitting. DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report D. Periodic Review Checklist Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 1 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM PERIODIC REVIEW Periodic Review Checklist This document is intended for use by counties, cities and towns subject to the Shoreline Management Act (SMA) to conduct the “periodic review” of their Shoreline Master Programs (SMPs). This review is intended to keep SMPs current with amendments to state laws or rules, changes to local plans and regulations, and changes to address local circumstances, new information or improved data. The review is required under the SMA at RCW 90.58.080(4). Ecology’s rule outlining procedures for conducting these reviews is at WAC 173-26-090. This checklist summarizes amendments to state law, rules and applicable updated guidance adopted between 2007 and 2019 that may trigger the need for local SMP amendments during periodic reviews. How to use this checklist See the associated Periodic Review Checklist Guidance for a description of each item, relevant links, review considerations, and example language. At the beginning of the periodic review, use the review column to document review considerations and determine if local amendments are needed to maintain compliance. See WAC 173-26-090(3)(b)(i). Ecology recommends reviewing all items on the checklist. Some items on the checklist prior to the local SMP adoption may be relevant. At the end of your review process, use the checklist as a final summary identifying your final action, indicating where the SMP addresses applicable amended laws, or indicate where no action is needed. See WAC 173-26-090(3)(d)(ii)(D), and WAC 173-26-110(9)(b). Local governments should coordinate with their assigned Ecology regional planner for more information on how to use this checklist and conduct the periodic review. Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 2 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 Prepared By Jurisdiction Date David Wayne Johnson Jefferson County 5/14/2021 Row Summary of change Review Action 2019 a. OFM adjusted the cost threshold for building freshwater docks JCC 18.25.560 Exemptions Listed #9 reads: “Residential Docks. … The private dock exemption applies to dock construction cost as specified in RCW 90.58.030(3)(e).” No action required. Reference to WAC 173-27-040(2)(h) is made. b. The Legislature removed the requirement for a shoreline permit for disposal of dredged materials at Dredged Material Management Program sites (applies to 9 jurisdictions) JCC 18.25.360 Dredging Dredge Disposal Regulation #4.d reads: “When consistent with this program, disposal of dredged materials in water areas other than PSDDA sites may only be allowed for the following reasons: (i) To restore or enhance habitat; or (ii) To reestablish substrates for fish and shellfish resources; or (iii) To nourish beaches that are starved for sediment; or (iv) To remediate contaminated sediments.” DMMP not applicable to Jefferson County. No action required c. The Legislature added restoring native kelp, eelgrass beds and native oysters as fish habitat enhancement projects. JCC 18.25.560 Exemptions Listed #18 reads: “A public or private project, the primary purpose of which is to improve fish or wildlife habitat or fish passage, when all of the following apply: (a) The project has been approved in writing by the Department of Fish and Wildlife as necessary for the improvement of the habitat or passage and appropriately designed and sited to No action required. Per Ecology, consider the expanded language at WAC 173-27-040(2)(p) with the more explicit citation to RCW 77.55.181. Change proposed to cross reference 173-27-040(2)(p). Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 3 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 Row Summary of change Review Action accomplish the intended purpose; (b) The project received hydraulic project approval by the Department of Fish and Wildlife pursuant to Chapter 75.20 RCW; and (c) The administrator has determined that the project is consistent with this program. The administrator shall make such determination in a timely manner and provide it by letter to the project proponent. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. IX § 3)]” 2017 a. OFM adjusted the cost threshold for substantial development to $7,047. JCC 18.25.100 Definition #19.tt reads: “Substantial Development…$5,718 or as adjusted by the state legislature…” JCC 18.25.560 Exemptions Listed #1. Fair Market Value reads: “…does not exceed $6,416 or as adjusted by WAC 173-27-040…” These dollar amounts are out of date, and internally inconsistent, however ‘or as adjusted’ ensures the current value would prevail. No action required. Optional revision to replace both outdated figures with current value of $7,047 for clarity & document improvement. Ecology suggests changing value or changing to citation; approach up to County but Ecology would require a change since the SMP had explicitly stated the older value. Change proposed to add new value. b. Ecology permit rules clarified the definition of “development” does not include dismantling or removing structures. JCC 18.25.100 Definition #4.g reads: “(g) ***“Development” means a use consisting of the construction or exterior alteration of structures; dredging; drilling; dumping; filling; removal of any sand, gravel, or minerals; bulkheading; driving of piling; placing of obstructions; or No action required. Optional revision to add text for clarity and document improvement. Change added to draft SMP revisions. Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 4 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 Row Summary of change Review Action any project of a permanent or temporary nature which interferes with the normal public use of the surface of the waters overlying lands subject to this program at any state of water level.” Definition is consistent with statute and WAC but lacks the clarification. c. Ecology adopted rules clarifying exceptions to local review under the SMA. JCC 18.25 does not address these exceptions from WAC 173-27-044 (remedial actions, boatyard improvements to meet NPDES permit requirements, WSDOT facility maintenance, etc.) No action required - the exceptions apply regardless of SMP inclusion. Optional text revision at 18.25.620(9) to add the example language for clarity and to ensure consistent implementation. Change added to draft SMP revisions. d. Ecology amended rules clarifying permit filing procedures consistent with a 2011 statute. JCC 18.25.750 Notice of decision, reconsideration and appeal. #1. A notice of decision for action on a shoreline substantial development permit, shoreline variance, or shoreline conditional use permit shall be provided to the applicant/proponent and any party of record in accordance with the procedures of Chapter 18.40 JCC and at least 10 days prior to filing such decisions with the Department of Ecology pursuant to WAC 173-27- 130. Decisions filed with the Department of Ecology shall contain the following information: (a) A copy of the complete application; Revision required to clarify current standards for date of filing by permit type, concurrent filings, ECY notice by phone/email & written, and submittal to ECY by return receipt requested. Incorporate example language. Change added to draft SMP revisions. Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 5 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 Row Summary of change Review Action (b) Findings and conclusions that establish the basis for the decision including but not limited to identification of shoreline environment designation, applicable master program policies and regulations and the consistency of the project with appropriate review criteria for the type of permit(s); (c) The final decision of the local government; (d) Where applicable, local government shall also file the applicable documents required by SEPA, or in lieu thereof, a statement summarizing the actions and dates of such actions taken under Chapter 43.21C RCW; and (e) When the project has been modified in the course of the local review process, plans or text shall be provided that clearly indicate the final approved plan. JCC 18.25.760 Initiation of Development #2 “Date of Filing. “Date of filing” of a substantial development permit is the date of actual receipt of the decision by the Department of Ecology. The “date of filing” for a shoreline variance or shoreline conditional use permit shall mean the date the permit decision rendered by the Department of Ecology is transmitted by the Department of Ecology to the county and the Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 6 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 Row Summary of change Review Action applicant/proponent. [Ord. 7- 13 Exh. A (Art. X § 17)]” e. Ecology amended forestry use regulations to clarify that forest practices that only involves timber cutting are not SMA “developments” and do not require SDPs. JCC 18.25.460 Forest Practices Regulation #4.b. “Except as provided in subsections (4)(c) and (d) of this section, timber harvesting and forest practices activities that do not meet the definition of development in Article II of this chapter shall not be regulated by this program and shall not require a shoreline permit.” … #4.e “Other activities associated with timber harvesting, such as filling, excavation, and building roads and structures, that meet the definition of development shall be regulated according to the general provisions (Article VI of this chapter), shoreline modification provisions (Article VII of this chapter) and/or the other applicable use-specific provisions (this article) of this program and shall require a shoreline substantial development permit or conditional use permit as specified in this program.” No action required. Optional text revision to incorporate example language. Change added to draft SMP revisions. f. Ecology clarified the SMA does not apply to lands under exclusive federal jurisdiction JCC 18.25.020 Applicability #4. This program shall apply to: (a) All of the lands and waters of Jefferson County that fall under the jurisdiction of Chapter 90.58 RCW; and (b) Every person, individual, firm, partnership, association, organization, Exclusive Federal Jurisdiction in Olympic National Park per RCW 37.08.210) is not explicitly addressed. Optional text revision for clarity to add example language. Per Ecology: Olympic National Park is one of two such Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 7 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 Row Summary of change Review Action local or state governmental agency, public or municipal corporation, or other nonfederal entity; and (c) All nonfederal uses and developments undertaken on federal lands and on lands subject to nonfederal ownership, lease, or easement, even though such lands may fall within the external boundaries of federally owned lands (Footnote1)*. *Wording from WAC 173-27- 060(3). locations established by statute and County is encouraged to address this issue, likely in JCC 18.25.020 Applicability. Change added to draft SMP revisions. g. Ecology clarified “default” provisions for nonconforming uses and development. JCC 18.25.660 No action required due to State rule. This rule is a default rule that only applies if a local government has no provisions in its local SMP addressing nonconforming uses. h. Ecology adopted rule amendments to clarify the scope and process for conducting periodic reviews. JCC 18.25.840 Master program amendments does not address periodic review. No action required – the periodic review requirements apply regardless of SMP inclusion. Optional text revision to add example language for clarity. Change added to draft SMP revisions. i. Ecology adopted a new rule creating an optional SMP amendment process that allows for a shared local/state public comment period. JCC 18.25.840 Master program amendments does not address the optional joint review process. No action required – the optional joint review process per WAC 173-26-104 applies regardless of SMP inclusion. j. Submittal to Ecology of proposed SMP amendments. JCC 18.25 does not address Ecology submittal requirements. No action required – the submittal requirements of WAC 173-26-110 and -120 apply regardless of SMP inclusion. Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 8 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 Row Summary of change Review Action 2016 a. The Legislature created a new shoreline permit exemption for retrofitting existing structure to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. JCC 18.25.560 Exemptions Listed does not include the new ADA exemption. No action required – the SDP exemption applies regardless of SMP inclusion. Ecology suggests including in full like other exemptions or changing to citations. Jefferson County can determine approach. Change of some kind would likely be required. Optional text revision for clarity to add example language. Change added to draft SMP revisions. b. Ecology updated wetlands critical areas guidance including implementation guidance for the 2014 wetlands rating system. 18.25.060 and .270(4)(a): The 2014 SMP adopts the now out-of-date 2008 critical areas regulations by reference. Related revisions anticipated during this periodic review will instead adopt the current 2020 CAO that addresses wetland issues as follows: • JCC 18.22.710 (2) references the 2014 Rating System; • JCC 18.22.730 (5) addresses wetland use for stormwater management; • JCC 18.22.730 (6) establishes buffer widths, Table .730(1)(b) identifies minimizing measures, and Table .730(1)(c) establishes the reduced buffer widths allowed; • JCC 18.22.730(9) requires a wildlife corridor for reduced buffer widths; Additional Amendments item #2011a below proposes concurrent revision to incorporate the 2020 CAO by reference. Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 9 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 Row Summary of change Review Action • JCC 18.22.740 addresses wetland mitigation • JCC 18.22.700 - .740 do not allow exemptions for small wetlands; • JCC 18.22.800 - .860 address agriculture in/near wetlands & other critical areas; The JCC 18.22.730 Table 1.a buffers and Table 1.b buffer reduction criteria reflect the Ecology CAO comment letter 1/21/20. Once the SMP relies on the 2020 CAO it will adequately reflect the most current technical guidance for wetlands. 2015 a. The Legislature adopted a 90- day target for local review of Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) projects. Neither JCC 18.25.520 Transportation nor JCC 18.25.650 Notice of application and permit application review specify this timeline target. No action required – the review timeline target applies regardless of SMP inclusion. Optional text revision at 18.25.650 to add example language. Change added to draft SMP revisions. 2014 a. The Legislature created a new definition and policy for floating on-water residences legally established before 7/1/2014. Neither JCC 18.25.220 Use Table nor 18.25.500 Residential specify Floating Homes or FOWRs, but do prohibit in-water, overwater or floating residences outright, and Single-Family Residential use (including appurtenances & accessory structures), waterward of OHWM in both the Priority Aquatic and the Aquatic SEDs. No action required. Optional text revision at 18.25.100(6) and .500(2)(a) for ‘floating dwellings’ to sync up terms used and Definitions with RCW 90.58.270. Per Ecology, though none exist and the SMP prohibits new residential in/over water, County may want to revise the existing term ‘floating house’ and definitions to reflect these terms defined by statute/WAC. Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 10 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 Row Summary of change Review Action JCC 18.25.100 Definition #6.m. “Floating house” means any floating structure that is designed, or has been substantially and structurally remodeled or redesigned, to serve primarily as a residence. “Floating houses” include house boats, house barges, or any floating structures that serve primarily as a residence and do not qualify as a vessel. A floating structure that is used as a residence and is capable of navigation, but is not designed primarily for navigation, nor is normally capable of self-propulsion and use as a means of transportation, is a floating house, not a vessel per WAC 332-30-103. Change added to draft SMP revisions. See also related issue at 2011.c below. 2012 a. The Legislature amended the SMA to clarify SMP appeal procedures. JCC 18.25.840 Master program amendments. Pursuant to RCW 90.58.190 and 36.70A.280, a decision by the Jefferson County board of county commissioners to amend this master program shall not constitute a final appealable decision until the Department of Ecology has made a decision to approve, reject, or modify the proposed amendment. Following the decision of the Department of Ecology regarding the proposed amendment, the decision may be appealed to the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings No action required – the statutory & rule requirements apply regardless of SMP inclusion. Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 11 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 Row Summary of change Review Action Board. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 25)] 2011 a. Ecology adopted a rule requiring that wetlands be delineated in accordance with the approved federal wetland delineation manual. 18.25.060 and .270(4)(a): The 2014 SMP adopts the now out-of-date 2008 critical areas regulations by reference. Related revisions anticipated during this periodic review will instead adopt the current 2020 CAO that addresses wetland delineation as follows: • JCC 18.22.710(1) references a specific dated delineation manual ‘or as revised’. Once the SMP relies on the 2020 CAO it will adequately reflect the most current technical guidance for wetland delineations. Additional Amendments item #xx below proposes concurrent revision to incorporate the 2020 CAO by reference. b. Ecology adopted rules for new commercial geoduck aquaculture. JCC 18.25.100 Definitions #1.bb includes the clarification that wildstock geoduck harvest is not aquaculture; #2.t “Bottom culture” means all aquaculture systems that are set on or securely and rigidly attached to the tidelands or bedlands and do not extend higher than six feet from the bottom (excluding hoists and similar apparatus). Bottom culture includes but is not limited to geoduck tubes, oyster longlines, clam netting, oyster rack and bags, and clam bags. Bottom culture does not include aquaculture suspended from rafts or buoys or contained in floating net pens. JCC 18.25.220 and -440 have been revised to require a CUP for all new commercial geoduck aquaculture and to add supporting regulations governing commercial geoduck aquaculture per WAC 173-26- 241(3)(b)(ii-iv). A general provision that applies to all aquaculture from WAC 173-26- 241(3)(b)(C) was also added as JCC 18.25.440(4)(f). Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 12 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 Row Summary of change Review Action JCC 18.25.220 Use Table Geoduck aquaculture is allowed in both the Priority Aquatic and Aquatic SEDs, requires an SDP when adjacent to High Intensity SED, and requires a CUP when adjacent to Natural, Conservancy, and Shoreline Residential SEDS. JCC 18.25.440 Aquaculture. General Regulations 4.a-f apply, including: • initial siting/planting SDP 5- yr limit + 1-yr extension; • ongoing operations allowance; • 25% / 10-yr expansion limit; • activities allowed w/o SDP, unless public use interference, structures, mechanical dredging, or filling; • JARPA & SEPA submittals to allow case-by-case assessment of use interference w/ exceptions; • Standards e(i – xv) re: adverse impacts, cumulative effects, nonWO structures, OW sleeping quarters, height limits, visual impacts, interference w/ Nav, Public Access, Tribal harvest, 600 - 1500 from NWR/other protected areas, shading kelp, helical anchors, compensate use of public facilities, predator control methods, chemicals/GMOs, non-Nav lighting, waste disposal; • f. “Prior to approving a permit for floating/hanging aquaculture’ use and Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 13 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 Row Summary of change Review Action development or bottom culture involving structures, the county may require a visual analysis prepared by the applicant/proponent describing effects on nearby uses and aesthetic qualities of the shoreline. The analysis shall demonstrate that adverse impacts on the character of those areas are effectively mitigated.” c. The Legislature created a new definition and policy for floating homes permitted or legally established prior to January 1, 2011. See 2014.a above See 2014.a above d. The Legislature authorizing a new option to classify existing structures as conforming. Neither JCC 18.25.660 Nonconforming development nor JCC 18.25.500 Residential. establish this optional allowance No action required. Optional revision to add text implementing RCW 90.58.620 and WAC 173-26-241(3.j) at .660(1)(e) Change added. 2010 a. The Legislature adopted Growth Management Act – Shoreline Management Act clarifications. Critical areas in shoreline jurisdiction must be protected to ‘assure no net loss of shoreline ecological function’ - .270(2)(a) and (b) provide general NNL regulations; more explicit provision needed for strict compliance. Critical area regs are incorporated by reference or established separately by the SMP - both .060 and .270 establish incorporation by reference; SMP becomes effective 14-days after ECY final action - .840 addresses Master program amendments but does not specify the effective date. For consistency with WAC 173- 26-221(2.a.ii), amendment made to .270(1)(a) for critical area protection; SMP not required to include effective date detail per WAC 173-26-120(3.d.i), but for clarity, optional amendment made to 18.25.840 regarding effective date. Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 14 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 Row Summary of change Review Action 2009 a. The Legislature created new “relief” procedures for instances in which a shoreline restoration project within a UGA creates a shift in Ordinary High Water Mark. Neither JCC 18.25.170 Restoration and enhancement – Purpose & Goals; nor JCC 18.25.400 Restoration address this optional relief provision. No action required – the process may be used regardless of SMP inclusion. Optional text revision to add example language (i.e. Checklist Guidance option 1) Change added to draft SMP revisions - see new section JCC 18.25. at .400(4) b. Ecology adopted a rule for certifying wetland mitigation banks. Referenced potential for wetland mitigation bank in SMP at JCC 18.25.270 (2)(h). Fee in lieu is referenced in CAO. The County has not established a mitigation bank program so (2)(h) serves as a placeholder until such a certified program exists. Language in JCC 18.25.270(2)(h) meets the Ecology requirement; Optional text revision to add the word ‘certified’ for accuracy/clarity (i.e., …certified mitigation banks,…). c. The Legislature added moratoria authority and procedures to the SMA. JCC 18.25 does not address moratoria No action required – the statutory provisions apply regardless of SMP inclusion. 2007 a. The Legislature clarified options for defining "floodway" as either the area that has been established in FEMA maps, or the floodway criteria set in the SMA. JCC 18.25.100 Definitions #6.r. “Floodway” means the area of a river valley that conveys flood waters with reasonable regularity, although not necessarily annually. At a minimum, the floodway is that which has been established in Federal Emergency Management Act flood insurance rate maps or Federal Emergency Management Act floodway maps. Other data and information, including topography, changes in soil or vegetation, and other indicators of past flooding, may be used to define and map a floodway that meets The adopted SMP definition is similar to Ecology example language Option 1. Made edits to be identical. Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 15 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 Row Summary of change Review Action the objectives of the Shoreline Management Act, Chapter 90.58 RCW. The floodway shall not include those lands that can reasonably be expected to be protected from 100-year flood waters by flood control devices maintained by or maintained under license from the federal government, the state, or a political subdivision of the state. b. Ecology amended rules to clarify that comprehensively updated SMPs shall include a list and map of streams and lakes that are in shoreline jurisdiction. JCC 18.25.870 Official Shoreline Map adequately shows jurisdictional waterbodies including streams/rivers and lakes; The SMP does not include a List of Waterbodies as required by WAC 173-18-044 Streams, and -20-044 Lakes. The list provided in the SMP shall be the official list for that jurisdiction and supersedes the list previously established by WAC. A modified version of the list of shorelines from the Inventory and Characterization are added as a new .890 to identify the streams/rivers and lakes constituting shorelines of the state within the jurisdiction of this SMP. c. Ecology’s rule listing statutory exemptions from the requirement for an SDP was amended to include fish habitat enhancement projects that conform to the provisions of RCW 77.55.181. JCC 18.25.560 Exemptions Listed #18 lacks an explicit reference to RCW 77.55.181. No action required See related issue at 2019.c above. Change added to draft SMP at .560 to add WAC citation for detailed description that includes reference to RCW 77.55.181. Other Required Amendments Per Ecology Year SMP Section Summary of Change Discussion 1989 ORMA; 18.25.900 - 930 Ocean Management 18.25.060 –While ORMA (RCW 43.143) and WAC 173- 26-360 have long been in Ecology required though not on periodic review checklist since ORMA and WAC 173-26- Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 16 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 Year SMP Section Summary of Change Discussion 2018 Marine Spatial Plan effect, the SMP’s Ocean uses placeholder provision at (5) was adequate for 2014 approval; since then the WA Marine Spatial Plan was adopted in 2018, and the SMP now needs adequate provisions to fully implement ORMA & the MSP as required by statute & WAC. 360 predate 2007 legislative changes. Separate ORMA & MSP draft guidance materials provided January 2021 by Ecology. See added article XII in SMP using example/model language. Additional amendments The additional amendments listed below address issues identified by County staff during implementation, including administrative code interpretations, and by the 2020 SMP Task Force. These amendments are intended to ensure consistency with the County Comprehensive Plan and development regulations, and reflect changes in local circumstance, new information, and improved data, including implementation challenges and the County’s Regulatory Reform Resolution #17-19. County-Proposed Edits: SMP Task Force SMP Section Summary of change Discussion & Action 18.25.660 Nonconforming development Task Force A: Maintain protective standards to achieve no-net-loss of shoreline ecological function, but reduce unnecessary CUPs/variances. Potentially adjust administrative versus discretionary CUPs. Examples include but are not limited to: existing single family home expansions and septic systems. Meet environmental protection and address regulatory reform. 18.25.270(5)(e) Added provisions for septic expansion in the buffer; 18.25.340(3)(e) and (f) Beach Access Structure allowances per SED – removed CUP requirement for Shoreline Residential and High Intensity SEDs. 18.25.660(8) Allow for lateral expansion subject to the square footage limitations subject to a Type II permit that includes notice. Add a more specific planting plan intended to provide no-net-loss through equivalent enhancement of the shoreline buffer. Also add a monitoring plan to help respond to tribal and agency input. In JCC 18.25.660(8) in addition to allowing for waterward expansion in existing structure foundation wall, allow for a small one-time enlargement of only 200 Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 17 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 SMP Section Summary of change Discussion & Action square feet on existing legally installed impervious area and if landward of the common line setback if providing a planting plan and revegetating the area with 80% native plantings; similar to modest home provision but for small expansions (e.g. expand kitchen in only place possible). 18.25.660 (9) Expansions that are larger than in (8) that are lateral, vertical, or landward, with discretionary permit provided the applicant prepares a planting plan and conducts monitoring in (8)(g). 18.25.300(2)(d) Allow for height variance in order to respond to sea level rise. 18.25.220 Allowed Use Table, 18.25.350 Boating Facilities Task Force B: Review permit type and standards for buoys compared to other shoreline facilities for boating. Consider where there are good locations for buoys. Review buoy standards versus anchoring, and unintended consequences of SMP regulations. Clarify permitting standards surrounding eelgrass beds, including differences between areas with eelgrass patches and full eelgrass coverage. Consider appropriate number or density of buoys. Clarify SMP. Allow best practices that minimize environmental impact. Address regulatory reform. Result: .220 Use Table - Shifted buoys from ‘C(a)’ for CUP to ‘P’ for SDP in Shoreline Residential and Conservancy environments. .350 Boating Facilities – (2.d & e) Revised text to match revised Use Table SED allowances; (8.d, e & h) Revised text to minimize eelgrass disturbance, specify limited allowance for non-embedded anchor, and increased limit on number of buoys per residential lot to two (DNR allows second buoy to help secure moorage of a single boat to first buoy; see Washington department of Natural Resources Recreational Mooring Buoys brochure, October 2014. https://www.dnr.wa.gov/publications/aqr _mooring_buoy_brochure_318.pdf). 18.25.120, 18.25.180, 18.25.190, 18.25.300, 18.25.430, 18.25.520 Task Force C: Add in Comprehensive Plan climate policies like Option 1. Plus, strive for consistency with Port Townsend’s SMP. Ensure that policies and permit standards do not limit Proactively address climate change and sea-level rise particularly for activities with long-life. Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 18 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 SMP Section Summary of change Discussion & Action projects that are proactively addressing projections in sea level rise due to climate change. Consider elevation, not just distance from the ordinary highwater mark, for shoreline permitting. Result: Most Comprehensive Plan policies added into SMP. Opportunity to request a Variance to add height in response to sea- level rise. Added policy on retreat, accommodate, and protect. 18.25.100 Definitions, Table 18.25.220, 18.25.450 Task Force D: Marine trades and economic development. Ensure SMP permitting process does not unduly burden marine trades. Recognize important sectors that support economy and water oriented uses. Result: Reviewed current use matrix; most uses listed in added marine trades definition addressed in SMP. Also see edits to .350 buoys and launches. Also added reference to maritime trades definition and maritime education/training at .100 (19.c) as a scientific and educational activity subject to commercial standards. 2018 study by Martin Associates: http://ptmta.org/wp/wp- content/uploads/2018/05/2018-Jefferson- County-Marine-Trades-Impact-Report.pdf. Allowed Use Table 18.25.220, 18.25.350 Boating facilities Task Force E: Encourage development of new public boat launches and improvement of existing boat launches in SMP. Lack of boat launches, condition of existing. Result: .220 Use Table - Changed CUP to P for nonresidential boat launches in Conservancy. .350 (2.d) – Revised text to allow nonresidential launch with SDP to match use Table revision. This should assist with new launches and modifications/expansions/ improvements of existing launches. .350(3.b.iii) and (4.b) Public and Private Boat Launches - After conversation with WDFW, added reference to WAC design standards to be used to extent feasible. Also made sure that distinction between residential/nonresidential vs. public/private was applied in the regulations appropriately and consistent with the use matrix. 18.25.250 SSWS Use preference Task Force F: Review how Shoreline Management Act purposes are carried out with use allowances and permitting. Clarify how SMP is carried out on SSWS identified for optimal implementation of SMP. Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 19 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 SMP Section Summary of change Discussion & Action Result: Addressed policy updates which should apply to all permits. County Proposed SMP Edits: Staff Docket and Code Interpretations SMP Section Summary of Change Discussion 18.25.100 definitions Clarify terminology in appurtenance definition (e.g. add deck) Assist with applying exemptions at 18.25.560 regarding single family and appurtenances 18.25.100(6)(d) and 18.25.340 Beach access structures (2) Uses & Activities Prohibited Outright and Regulation (4)(j) - These two sections contradict each other. If new beach access is prohibited in marine feeder bluffs, why would it be allowed if the project is shown not to adversely affect? Redefine "feeder bluff" under 18.25.100(6)(d). Definition based on: Shipman, H., MacLennan, A., and Johannessen, J. 2014. Puget Sound Feeder Bluffs: Coastal Erosion as a Sediment Source and its Implications for Shoreline Management. Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program, Washington Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA. Publication #14-06- 016. https://apps.ecology.wa.gov/publications/doc uments/1406016.pdf Retained subsection 18.25.340(2) based on Ecology feedback. Revised (4)(j) to eliminate duplicative reference to marine feeder bluffs which are prohibited in (340)(2). 18.25.100 Definitions Consider adding definitions for waterward and lateral as associated with implementing code language. Add definition under 18.25.100(12) for "Lateral," to define expansion in relation to the OHWM. Staff have found a need to include a definition of lateral as the term is not as understandable as waterward. Definition has to do with clarifying the distance from the OHWM which is how we determine conformity, not the overall size of the lot in terms of square feet. 18.25.100 Definitions and possibly 18.25.270 Revise (14)(h) nonconforming lot definition from "…minimum lot size…" to "minimum lot depth…", and check how it is used relative to the .270 (5)(a) modest home provision and the (5)(b) common line buffer. Clarify with revised definition of nonconforming in Article II,18.25.100. Change the text "size" to "depth." Coordinate with Code Interpretation #3 below. 18.25.100 Definitions and 18.25.240 Designation of shorelines of Incorrect citation/duplicative text - Definition of Shoreline of Statewide Significance are duplicates in JCC 18.25.100(19)(w)(i) and (ii). JCC 18.25.100(19)(vii) refers to both (i)and Delete subsection 18.25.100(w)(ii) and re- number subsequent subsections. Delete reference to (ii) in subsection (vii) (to be new subsection (vi) after re-numbering). Shorelines Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 20 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 SMP Section Summary of Change Discussion statewide significance. (ii), should ensure the correct subsections are reflected. of statewide significance should be verbatim from RCW 90.58.030(2)(f). 18.25.100 Add definitions of utilities and water system plan. Per recommendation of Ecology and County staff. The SMP is missing the definitions of “Utilities” and “Water Systems” from the definitions section of the SMP. It was suggested that “Utilities” and “Water Systems” be defined per WAC and pasted into the SMP. The definition of utilities is based on WAC 173- 26-241 (3) (l) and the definition of water system is based on per WAC 246-290. 18.25.200 Shoreline jurisdiction & mapping; and .210(4) Shoreline environment designations – Purpose and criteria. Implementation challenge - Clarify that west end rivers are aquatic below OHWM Add to .200(4)(c). 18.25.220 There is no category for “public use” in the use table. While working on a permit for a school in the shoreline jurisdiction, staff noticed there is no category for “public use” in the use table. Reviewing example SMPs, many treat institutional uses similar to commercial uses. 18.25.270 Critical areas, shoreline buffers, and ecological protection (4)Critical area & shoreline buffer Regulation (a)(i) - …SMP/Critical Area clarification This subsection was intended to mean that critical area regulations in Chapter 18.22 are to be used, but where there are discrepancies (such as those pertaining to buffers, nonconforming development, etc.), then the SMP prevails. Clarify how the SMP subsections pertaining to critical areas interact with critical area regulations in Chapter 18.22. 18.25.270 Critical areas, shoreline buffers, and ecological protection (4) Critical Areas and Shoreline Buffers Regulation (c) and (e)(iii) - Clarify if all streams requires a 150- foot buffer in all shoreline environments or if it is only those identified as "shorelines" in 90.58 RCW (>20cfs) Clarify title of (4)(e) to refer to shorelines. Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 21 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 SMP Section Summary of Change Discussion 18.25.270 Critical areas, shoreline buffers, and ecological protection (4) Regulations – Critical Areas and Shoreline Buffers – (i) Buffer Usage - Need to add a definition for "active use" within the shoreline buffer. Create definition for "active use" in 18.25.100(1) 18.25.270 Critical areas, shoreline buffers, and ecological protection (4) Critical Areas and Shoreline Buffers Regulation -(l) Alternative Protection via Critical Areas Stewardship Plans (CASPs) - Revise CASP from a Type III Shoreline Variance to a Type II SDP process and when it is used in shoreline jurisdiction - current language is awkward. Replace text of last sentence in 18.25.270(4)(l) to read, "such buffer modification shall require a Type II Substantial Development Permit (SDP).” Address consistency with CAO. 18.25.270 Critical areas, shoreline buffers, and ecological protection (5) Regulations – Exceptions to Critical Area and Shoreline Buffer Standards - Clarify that expansions to existing residential development can use the modest home provisions; not just new SFR development. Delete the text "New" under 18.25.270(5)(a). 18.25.300 Shoreline setbacks and height Regulation (2)(b) - Side yard setback language is confusing. SMP does not establish side yard setbacks, and JCC 18.30 does not identify side yard setbacks based off of zoning which makes it confusing for in water. Broaden to indicate side yards shall be consistent with zoning. 18.25.310 Vegetation conservation Provide clarification on vegetation maintenance requirements and how it is applicable to clearing for new development, such as a single family residence, or just for views. Delete "new" from 18.25.310(2)(b), (c), (d), and (e). Ecology also provided informal comments to clarify normal maintenance. 18.25.410 Structural shoreline armoring and shoreline stabilization. Clarify that the applicant must demonstrate erosion from ‘currents, tidal action, wind, or wave action’ per WAC 173-26-231(3.a) to approve soft shore stabilization. Add soft shore stabilization regulations. Geotechnical report requirement added to (4)(a) for Subdivisions and Existing Lots without Structures and (5)(e) for New or Expanded Shoreline Armoring. Description of geotechnical report contents added to (11)(f). Requirement for use of soft approaches when feasible added to (5)(d)(iii). Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 22 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 SMP Section Summary of Change Discussion A new section (10) added to make it clear that shoreline stabilization proposals that include structural (hard) elements such as rocks or logs must comply with applicable standards of sections (5) and (6), which may include a geotechnical analysis. In several locations, “and/or shoreline stabilization” was added when a provision was intended to apply to all kinds of shoreline protection methods (e.g., to (4)(a) and (4)(c) for existing lots and (11) Application Requirements.) 18.25.410 Structural shoreline armoring and shoreline stabilization Regulations - New or Expanded Shoreline Armoring at 18.25.410(5)(c)(iii) has wrong code reference to flood regulations. Correct the text reference in JCC 18.25.410(5)(c)(iii) from "JCC 18.30.070",which are the County’s Development Standards to "JCC 15.15." the County’s 2019 Flood Damage Prevention ordinance. 18.25.410 Structural shoreline armoring and shoreline stabilization Regulations - New or Expanded Shoreline Armoring, Design Standards at (6)(h) - Review if text should reference ‘fewer than 5’ or ‘4 or fewer’ residential lots as it would otherwise be inconsistent with WAC 173-26-221(4). Correct the text reference in JCC 18.25.410(6)(h) 18.25.440 Aquaculture General Regulation (4)(b)(i) - Clarify area included in 25% increase for both in-water and above OHWM development. Add text, "This applies to both in-water and above OHWM development." 18.25.440 (4)(d) Aquaculture Incorrect citation - References subsection (3)(c), but reference for interference should be (4)(c). Change reference to (3)(c) to (4)(c)(i) 18.25.440(4)(f) Section (4)(f) addresses a visual analysis for floating/hanging aquacultural. This is repeated (and modified) in (7)(b) – is duplicative of now-numbered (7)(c) Retain (7)(b) which seems to be the most appropriate location and remove (4)(f) as redundant. 18.25.440 (6) Aquaculture (6) Application Requirements - Provide guidance on the existing requirement for a visual analysis to Add text to 18.25.440(6)(b) to address guidance on visual impact. Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 23 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 SMP Section Summary of Change Discussion evaluate aesthetic impacts to aid both applicants and practitioners for submitting & reviewing such reports 18.25.560 Exemptions listed (15), (16), and (17) - Revise watershed restoration exemptions to be consistent with state law. Exemptions 15 and 17 are definitions, not exemptions. Clarify that exemption 16 has no shoreline permitting fee, per RCW 90.58.515. For editorial purposes, revise 18.25.560 Exemptions numbering to consolidate subsections (15), (16) & (17). 18.25.600 Unclassified uses; possibly, 18.25.100(3)(q) .600 - Clarify if an unclassified conditional use is a C, C(a), or C(d). If it is determined to be a C (i.e., Type III), then the CUP definition in JCC 18.25.100(3)(q) needs to be revised. If there is no C (Type III) in the shoreline regulations, that should be clarified in JCC 18.25.600. Revise text in 18.25.600 that reads, "may be authorized as conditional uses…" to read, "may be authorized as a Discretionary Conditional Use "C(d)" permit, provided…" 18.25.620 Permit application review. Unclear if C(a) permit and SSDP requires a Type III process. What is the process for stand-alone SSDP (yes use, but SSDP required)? JCC 18.25.620(3) & (4) are clear that C(a) and C(d) are processed as Type IIs. Clarify .620(2) to clarify SDPs are Type II and variances are Type III. 18.25.620 Permit application review & .630 Minimum permit application requirements Incorrect location - JCC 18.25.630(18) & (19) should be in 18.25.620 as (7) and (8) Move subsections (18) of 18.25.630 to 18.25.620 and re-number as subsection (7). Move subsection (19) to top of section .630 per Ecology request. 18.25.650 Notice of application and permit application review Why is section silent on notices for Type II permits, but spells out process on Type I and III permits? Add text "II &" to 18.25.650(1)(b) "Type III project permit…". Permit procedures should reference other processes in UDC and not duplicate or create new. 18.25.660 Nonconformin g development (9) Expansion/Enlargement with a Conditional Use Permit - Clarify if non-conforming lateral expansion is a C(a) or a C(d) Clarified as a C(d) in subsection (9). Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 24 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 SMP Section Summary of Change Discussion 18.25.660 Nonconformin g development Non-conforming expansion: change foundation walls to roof line to (8) and (10), and consider adding similar roof line language to (9). Combined with Task Force A direction. Clarify filling in the notch of foundation walls versus enclosing a porch (with size and enhancement criteria. Allow for expansion laterally as well as landward if meeting criteria. Allow for expansions meeting criteria in subsection (8) with SDP rather than an exemption to clarify procedures and allow for some notice. Provide specificity on planting plan and monitoring and for property owner to do on their own unless County determines professional is needed to support Regulatory Reform. Apply planting plan clarifications to subsections (9) and (10). 18.25.660 Nonconformin g development (8)(9) planting plan needs to be more explicit re: if a habitat management plan by a biologist is required. Define what is needed in a "planting plan" in subsections 18.25.660(8) & (9).Clarify planting plan related to other SMP standards and definitions with attention to regulatory reform to address implementation needs and avoid unnecessary paperwork and expense. Also add monitoring since enhancements should be retained. Also helps respond to interagency meeting/tribes. County Proposed SMP Edits: Code Interpretations Code Interpretation Summary of change - SMP Section Discussion Code Interpretation #1 2014 Septic Repair Add new section 18.25.270(5)(e). “(e) Nonconforming Septic Repair. The repair and replacement of an existing on-site sewage (OSS; or ‘septic’) system may be allowed in the buffer as an exemption under Section .560(2) of this Program if the system meets all the following criteria:…” The code interpretation was necessary, and approved by Ecology, to remedy the fact that as written, a repair of a failing septic system in the buffer would require a shoreline variance. Since we wanted to encourage and facilitate the repair of failing septic systems in the shoreline to protect water quality, we worked with Environmental Health Department to allow those repairs without an expansion of the system to be permitted as an exemption instead of a Type III Shoreline Variance requiring a public hearing and a decision by the Hearing Examiner. Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 25 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 Code Interpretation Summary of change - SMP Section Discussion Code Interpretation #2 2015 Stormwater Add new section 18.25.270(5)(f). “(f) Stormwater Improvements. Stormwater improvements may be allowed in the buffer as an exemption under Section .560(2) of this Program when all the following criteria are met:…” At one time the County offered a vesting tool called a Site Plan Approval Advanced Determination (SPAAD). Anticipating an increase in the shoreline buffer, many shoreline property owners used the SPAAD to vest under the then 30 foot buffer for five years. Although the SPAAD vested the location of the home, it rarely addressed stormwater treatment facilities in the new 150 foot buffer. The code interpretation allowed placement of stormwater elements within the buffer under an approved SPAAD, similar to the failed septic systems under #1. Code Interpretation #3 2017 Non-conforming Shoreline Lots Change “size” to “depth” in section 18.25.100(14)(h): “Nonconforming lot” means a legal lot of record in existence prior to the effective date of this program and any amendments thereto, on which it is not possible to construct a structure outside of/landward of the shoreline buffer or which does not otherwise meet the minimum lot depth requirements as set forth in this program. Depth of lot is measured as the distance from ordinary high water mark to the inside edge of the frontage setback Definition for non-conforming lot has to do with clarifying the distance from the OHWM which is how we determine conformity in linear feet in terms of buffer width, not the overall size of the lot in terms of square feet, and is consistent with the “Depth” referenced in the following sentence. Also clarifies that lot size is not related to zoning (i.e. RR5) per code interpretation #3, in terms of the erroneous assumption that any lot less than 5 acres in the RR5 zone could be considered non-conforming. Code Interpretation #4 2019 Private Tidelands Not Applicable. The Code Interpretation analyzes the issue of whether the public has lawful access to privately owned tidelands, and is informational and advisory only. Summary: There is a strong body of case law and persuasive sources supporting public access and use of privately-owned tidelands and their dry sand areas for fishing, boating, swimming, and other recreational purposes under common law doctrines, such as the public trust doctrine and customary use theory. Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 26 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 Code Interpretation Summary of change - SMP Section Discussion While there is not a clear statement of the law on this issue and there is not an applicable controlling case, it is likely that the Washington State Supreme Court will recognize public access under the public trust doctrine or another common law doctrine if addressed by the court at a later time. Code Interpretation #5 2020 Critical Area Setback Not Applicable. However, related to code section change proposed for 18.25.270(4)(f) under code interpretation #3. This Code Interpretation makes a one-time case-by-case jurisdictional determination under the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program ("SMP") and determines the appropriate critical area wetland buffer and setback for proposed development of the Short Plat based upon the regulations as they currently exist. Informal Agency Comments Fall 2020/Spring 2021 A productive multi-agency meeting was held on January 26, 2021, which included Skokomish Tribe, Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe, WDFW, DNR, Ecology, Port Townsend, Kitsap County, and others. Through that discussion and follow up contacts through meetings or emails other requests or suggestions were made informally. SMP Section Summary of Change Discussion 18.25.100(2) Supports the language that a “Parallel structure along a shoreline at/above/ near OHWL with the intent to act like a bulkhead and to have similar impacts to shoreline armor must be reviewed/permitted as new shoreline armor.” Modified the definition of bulkhead in JCC 18.25.100(2). 18.25.100(8) Support the inclusion of kelp habitat protection as critical fish habitat and kelp as species of special concern under the Jefferson County SMP. Kelp beds are identified in the SMP as a “habitat of special significance.” 18.25.270, 18.25.660, and 18.22.640 Regarding buffer averaging, emphasize the need for careful review, and mitigation sequencing. Buffers initially Buffer averaging criteria at JCC 18.22.660 include avoidance and Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 27 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 SMP Section Summary of Change Discussion enhanced as mitigation may degrade over time. minimization, and that averaging cannot reduce functions of values. Regarding shoreline buffers and nonconforming development, see addition of planting plan details, monitoring and retaining enhancements. 18.25.340 Beach access structures Strongly support the protection of feeder bluffs from potential ecological process disruption and recommend that any changes to prohibitions increase or maintain the current level of protection. Pursuant to comments from both Ecology and WDFW, beach access structures remain prohibited on feeder bluffs. JCC 18.25.350(3) Recommend including language consistent with the Washington Administrative Code section 220-660- 150 for boat launches in in freshwater areas, and WAC 220-660-390 for boat launches in marine waters. JCC 18.25.350(3)(b)(iii) was modified to specifically reference parts 3 and 4 of each of the WAC sections. Part 2 was not specifically referenced as it seems to be just a statement of the effects of boat launches which are then addressed by the design standards of part 3. 18.25.350 Boating Facilities: Mooring Buoys Prioritize avoidance of impacts to eelgrass beds. “Avoid” was initially replaced with “minimize” after hearing from a Task Force member with specific experiences permitting projects that could not avoid an eelgrass bed, and the alternative would have been a fixed pile pier with greater, although different, aquatic impacts. The original language was too rigid. However, it has now been amended to say “Avoid, to the extent feasible, and minimize….” The intent is to still prioritize avoidance, but not close the door if that is not feasible. 18.25.350(7) Suggest a recommendation or requirement in the SMP Draft that guides applicants on the sequencing of mooring buoy permitting. Provision added to 18.25.350(7)(h)(i) encouraging applicants to pursue Corps permits prior to state and local permits. JCC 18.25.410(11) Recommend additional requirements on assessments of new marine shoreline armoring related to time frame and Language in WAC 173-26- 231(3)(a)(iii)(D) has been incorporated into the SMP at JCC Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review Checklist 28 July 2019 Jefferson County | Draft | May 14, 2021 SMP Section Summary of Change Discussion rates of erosion within three years, and identify drainage issues. 18.25.410(11)(f) (Application materials). JCC 18.25.410, Shoreline Armoring There are new state rules for WDFW regarding required information needed from applicants proposing marine shoreline armoring projects. Recommend coordinating requirements. Edits made to JCC 18.25.410(11)(a) (Application materials) to address this comment. JCC 18.25.410(11) Recommend including language to require geotechnical analysis to assess the necessity and impacts to geological processes of proposed new shoreline armoring. See HAP application information. JCC 18.25.410(11) (Regulations - Application Requirements) already addresses most of items referenced as appliable to HPAs, particularly with the addition of a geotechnical report requirement as (11)(f). 1. Risk assessment is incorporated into new (11)(f). 2. Evidence/characterization of erosion is incorporated into new (11)(f). 3/4. Alternatives and impact analysis is required by (11)(c) and would also be addressed through (11)(d, e, g). 5. These items would also be provided in applicant materials required by (11) as well as JCC 18.25.630 (Minimum permit application requirements). 18.25.660 Nonconforming development Limit expansions of non-conforming residential waterward on impervious areas. Ensure no-net-loss standard is highlighted. Ensure expansions of non-waterward (e.g. lateral) are limited and provide enhancement. Regarding (8) planting plan - include monitoring. All modifications of nonconforming residences must meet criteria to avoid impacts to critical areas. Added more criteria for small enclosures on existing impervious areas with increased enhancement, specific size limits. Enhancement and planting plan requirements further specified with 5-year monitoring and conditions to retain enhancements. DRAFT May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | SMP Periodic Review Staff Report E. Periodic Review Proposed Changes Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 1/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Sections: Article I. Introduction 18.25.010 Purpose and intent. 18.25.020 Applicability. 18.25.030 Governing principles of this master program. 18.25.040 Title. 18.25.050 Adoption authority. 18.25.060 Critical areas regulations adopted by reference. 18.25.070 Relationship to other plans and regulations. 18.25.080 Liberal construction. 18.25.090 Severability. Article II. Definitions 18.25.100 Definitions. Article III. Master Program Goals 18.25.110 Purpose. 18.25.120 Conservation. 18.25.130 Economic development. 18.25.140 Historic, archaeological, cultural, scientific and educational resources. 18.25.150 Public access. 18.25.160 Recreation. 18.25.170 Restoration and enhancement. 18.25.180 Shoreline use. 18.25.190 Transportation, utilities and essential public facilities. Article IV. Shoreline Jurisdiction and Environment Designations 18.25.200 Shoreline jurisdiction and mapping. 18.25.210 Shoreline environment designations – Purpose and criteria. 18.25.220 Uses allowed in each shoreline environment designation. Article V. Shorelines of Statewide Significance 18.25.230 Adoption of policy. 18.25.240 Designation of shorelines of statewide significance. 18.25.250 Use preference. Article VI. General Policies and Regulations 18.25.260 Applicability. 18.25.270 Critical areas, shoreline buffers, and ecological protection. 18.25.280 Historic, archaeological, cultural, scientific and educational resources. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 2/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. 18.25.290 Public access. 18.25.300 Shoreline setbacks and height. 18.25.310 Vegetation conservation. 18.25.320 Water quality and quantity. Article VII. Shoreline Modifications Policies and Regulations 18.25.330 Applicability – Purpose. 18.25.340 Beach access structures. 18.25.350 Boating facilities – Boat launches, docks, piers, floats, lifts, marinas, and mooring buoys. 18.25.360 Dredging. 18.25.370 Filling and excavation. 18.25.380 Flood control structures. 18.25.390 In-stream structures. 18.25.400 Restoration. 18.25.410 Structural shoreline armoring and shoreline stabilization. Article VIII. Use-Specific Policies and Regulations 18.25.420 Purpose. 18.25.430 Agriculture. 18.25.440 Aquaculture. 18.25.450 Commercial use. 18.25.460 Forest practices. 18.25.470 Industrial and port development. 18.25.480 Mining. 18.25.490 Recreation. 18.25.500 Residential. 18.25.510 Signs. 18.25.520 Transportation. 18.25.530 Utilities. Article IX. Permit Criteria and Exemptions 18.25.540 Substantial development permit criteria. 18.25.550 Exemptions from shoreline substantial development permit process. 18.25.560 Exemptions listed. 18.25.570 Statements of exemption. 18.25.580 Variance permit criteria. 18.25.590 Conditional use permit criteria. 18.25.600 Unclassified uses. Article X. Administration and Enforcement 18.25.610 Administrative authority and responsibility. 18.25.620 Permit application review. 18.25.630 Minimum permit application requirements. 18.25.640 Preapplication conferences. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 3/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. 18.25.650 Notice of application and permit application review. 18.25.660 Nonconforming development. 18.25.665 State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) compliance. 18.25.670 Burden of proof. 18.25.680 Permit conditions. 18.25.690 Public hearings. 18.25.700 Expiration of permits and permit exemptions. 18.25.710 Permits and permit exemptions – Effective date. 18.25.720 Satisfaction of conditions required prior to occupancy or use. 18.25.730 Revisions following expiration of original permit or permit exemption. 18.25.740 Extensions – Notice to Ecology. 18.25.750 Notice of decision, reconsideration and appeal. 18.25.760 Initiation of development. 18.25.770 Permit revisions. 18.25.780 Rescission and modification. 18.25.790 Violations and penalties. 18.25.800 Remedies. 18.25.810 Abatement. 18.25.820 Third-party review. 18.25.830 Inspections. 18.25.840 Master program amendments. 18.25.850 Fees. 18.25.860 Transfer of permits. Article XI. Official Shoreline MapMapping 18.25.870 Official shoreline map. 18.25.880 Maps Illustrating SED Allowance for In-Water Finfish Aquaculture 18.25.890 List of SMP Waterbodies Article XII. Ocean Management 18.25.900 Applicability and Administration 18.25.910 Ocean Management Policies 18.25.920 Ocean Management Regulations 18.25.930 Important, Sensitive and Unique Areas (ISUs) Designation Article I. Introduction 18.25.010 Purpose and intent. (1) The purposes of this shoreline master program are to: (a) Guide the future use and development of Jefferson County’s shorelines in a positive, effective, and equitable manner consistent with the Washington State Shoreline Management Act of 1971 (Chapter 90.58 RCW) as amended; and (b) Promote the health, safety, and general welfare of the community by providing long range, comprehensive policies and effective, reasonable regulations for use and development of Jefferson County shorelines; and Commented [LG1]: Periodic Checklist 2007b Commented [LG2]: Respond to October 2020 Ecology Checklist addressing 2018 Marine Spatial Plan; provided in January 2021 Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 4/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (c) Ensure, at minimum, no net loss of shoreline ecological functions and processes; and (d) Plan for restoring shorelines that have been impaired or degraded in the past; and (e) Adhere to the policies contained in RCW 90.58.020 for shorelines of the state: It is the policy of the State to provide for the management of the shorelines of the State by planning for and fostering all reasonable and appropriate uses. This policy is designed to insure the development of these shorelines in a manner, which, while allowing for limited reduction of rights of the public in the navigable waters, will promote and enhance the public interest. This policy contemplates protecting against adverse effects to the public health, the land and its vegetation and wildlife, and the waters of the State and their aquatic life, while protecting generally public rights of navigation and corollary rights incidental thereto... In the implementation of this policy the public’s opportunity to enjoy the physical and aesthetic qualities of natural shorelines of the State shall be preserved to the greatest extent feasible consistent with the overall best interest of the State and the people generally. To this end uses shall be preferred which are consistent with control of pollution and prevention of damage to the natural environment or are unique to or dependent upon use of the State’s shoreline. Alterations of the natural condition of the shorelines of the State, in those limited instances when authorized, shall be given priority for single family residences, ports, shoreline recreational uses including but not limited to parks, marinas, piers, and other improvements facilitating public access to shorelines of the State, industrial and commercial developments which are particularly dependent on their location on or use of the shorelines of the State, and other development that will provide an opportunity for substantial numbers of the people to enjoy the shorelines of the State. Permitted uses in the shorelines of the State shall be designed and conducted in a manner to minimize, insofar as practical, any resultant damage to the ecology and environment of the shoreline area and any interference with the public’s use of the water. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. I § 1)] 18.25.020 Applicability. (1) All proposed uses and development, as defined in Article II of this chapter, occurring within shoreline jurisdiction shall comply with this program and Chapter 90.58 RCW. This program applies to all uses and developments within shoreline jurisdiction whether or not a shoreline permit or statement of permit exemption is required. (2) This program’s shoreline uses and developments shall be classified as follows: (a) Permitted Uses and Developments. Uses and developments that are consistent with this program and Chapter 90.58 RCW. Such uses/developments shall require a shoreline substantial development permit, a shoreline conditional use permit, a shoreline variance, and/or a statement that the use/development is exempt from a shoreline substantial development permit. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 5/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (b) Prohibited Uses and Developments. Uses and developments that are inconsistent with this program and/or Chapter 90.58 RCW and which cannot be allowed through any permit or variance. (3) Classification of a use or development as permitted does not necessarily mean the use/development is allowed. It means the use/development may be permitted subject to review and approval by the county and/or the Department of Ecology. Many permitted uses/developments, including those that do not require a substantial development permit, can individually or cumulatively affect adjacent properties and/or natural resources and therefore must comply with this program in order to avoid or minimize such adverse impacts. The county may attach conditions of approval to any permitted use via a permit or statement of exemption as necessary to assure consistency of the project with the Shoreline Management Act and this program. (4) This program shall apply to: (a) All of the lands and waters of Jefferson County that fall under the jurisdiction of Chapter 90.58 RCW; and consistent with Article IV; (b) Every person, individual, firm, partnership, association, organization, local or state governmental agency, public or municipal corporation, or other nonfederal entity; and (c) All nonfederal uses and developments undertaken on federal lands and on lands subject to nonfederal ownership, lease, or easement, even though such lands may fall within the external boundaries of federally owned lands1.; and (5) Federal agencies are subject to this program and Chapter 90.58 RCW, as provided by the Coastal Zone Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq. and WAC 173-27-060(1)). (6) The provisions of this program shall not apply to lands held in trust by the United States for Indian Nations, tribes or individuals. Where tribal concerns are expressed in relation to SMP jurisdiction, those shall be resolved through appropriate government to government consultation in accordance with Washington State Centennial Accord and the RCW. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. I § 2)] (7) Areas and uses in those areas that are under exclusive federal jurisdiction as established through federal or state statutes are not subject to the jurisdiction of chapter 90.58 RCW, including Olympic National Park. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. I § 2)] 18.25.030 Governing principles of this master program. (1) The goals, policies and regulations of this program are based on the governing principles in WAC 173- 26-186 and the policy statements of RCW 90.58.020. (2) Any inconsistencies between this program and Chapter 90.58 RCW must be resolved in accordance with the RCW. (3) The planning policies of this program may be achieved by diverse means, one of which is regulation. The county may also acquire land, implement capital projects and programs, encourage voluntary measures, create incentive programs, or use other means to implement this program’s planning policies. (4) When regulating use and development of private property, the county’s actions must be consistent with all relevant legal limitations including constitutional limitations. This program must not Commented [LG3]: 2017 f Periodic Checklist Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 6/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. unconstitutionally infringe on private property rights or result in an unconstitutional taking of private property. (5) The regulatory provisions of this program are limited to shorelines of the state, whereas the planning functions of this program may extend beyond shoreline jurisdiction. (6) The policies and regulations of this program must be integrated and coordinated with the policies and rules of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan (Comprehensive Plan) and its implementing development regulations adopted under the Growth Management Act (Chapter 36.70A RCW). (7) The policies and regulations of this program are intended to protect shoreline ecological functions by: (a) Requiring that current and potential ecological functions be identified and understood when evaluating new uses and developments. (b) Requiring adverse impacts to be mitigated in a manner that ensures no net loss of shoreline ecological functions. Mitigation, as defined in Article II of this chapter, shall include avoiding first, then minimizing, and then replacing/compensating for lost functions and/or resources. (c) Ensuring that all uses and developments, including preferred uses and uses that are exempt from a shoreline substantial development permit, will not cause a net loss of shoreline ecological functions. (d) Preventing, to the greatest extent practicable, cumulative impacts from individual developments. (e) Fairly allocating the burden of preventing cumulative impacts among development opportunities. (f) Including regulations and regulatory incentives to restore shoreline ecological functions where such functions have been degraded by past actions. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. I § 3)] 18.25.040 Title. This document shall be known as the Jefferson County shoreline master program (“the master program” or “this program”). [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. I § 4)] 18.25.050 Adoption authority. This master program is adopted under the authority granted by Chapter 90.58 RCW and Chapter 173-26 WAC. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. I § 5)] 18.25.060 Critical areas regulations adopted by reference. (1) The Jefferson County critical areas regulations contained in Chapter 18.22 JCC are integral and applicable to this program, and are hereby adopted by reference, except that:as described in detail at Section .270 . (a) Nonconforming use and development within shoreline jurisdiction shall be subject to this program and not JCC 18.22.240. Commented [LG4]: 2016 b and 2011 a and c Periodic Checklist Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 7/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (b) Exceptions to critical area and buffer standards shall be allowed as described in Article VI (JCC 18.25.270(5)) of this program. (c) Activities that are exempt from critical areas regulation per JCC 18.22.230 shall comply with this program. Such activities may require a shoreline substantial development permit, shoreline variance, or shoreline conditional use permit unless this program and RCW 90.58.030(3)(e) specifically indicate the activity is exempt from shoreline substantial development permit requirements. This provision shall not apply to agricultural activities on agricultural lands, which are exempt from both JCC 18.22.230 and this program. (2) The provisions of Chapter 18.22 JCC shall apply to any use, alteration or development within shoreline jurisdiction whether or not a shoreline permit or written statement of exemption is required. (3) Within shoreline jurisdiction, the regulations of Chapter 18.22 JCC shall be liberally construed together with this program to give full effect to the objectives and purposes of the provisions of this program and Chapter 90.58 RCW. (4) All references to the critical areas ordinance are for the version adopted on March 17, 2008, as Ordinance No. 03-0317-08, and further amended on May 11, 2009, as Ordinance No. 06-0511-09. (5) Ocean uses and activities conducted within Jefferson County’s and the state of Washington’s jurisdiction shall comply with Chapter 43.143 RCW (Ocean Resources Management Act) and WAC 173 -26-360 (Ocean Management). Nothing in this subsection is intended to expand or modify the applicability of Chapter 43.143 RCW, WAC 173-26-360, or any subsections thereof, to ocean uses and activities not otherwise governed by those laws, administrative rules, or their subsections. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. I § 6)] 18.25.070 Relationship to other plans and regulations. (1) Uses and developments regulated by this program may also be subject to other provisions of the JCC, the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (Chapter 43.21C RCW and Chapter 197-11 WAC), and other local, state and federal laws. (2) Project proponents are responsible for complying with all applicable laws prior to commencing any use, development or activity. (3) Where this program makes reference to any RCW, WAC, or other state or federal law or regulation, the most recent amendment or current edition shall apply. (4) In the event this program conflicts with other applicable county policies or regulations, all regulations shall apply and unless otherwise stated, the more restrictive provisions shall prevail. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. I § 7)] 18.25.080 Liberal construction. This program is exempt from the rule of strict construction; therefore this program shall be liberally construed to give full effect to its goals, policies and regulations. Liberal construction means that the interpretation of this document shall not only be based on the actual words and phrases used in it, but also by taking its deemed or stated purpose into account. Liberal construction means an interpretation that tends to effectuate the spirit and purpose of the writing. For purposes of this program, liberal construction means that the administrator shall interpret the regulatory language of this program in relation to the broad policy statement of RCW 90.58.020, and make determinations which are in keeping with those policies as enacted by the Washington State Legislature. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. I § 8)] Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 8/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. 18.25.090 Severability. If any section or provision of this program is declared invalid it shall not affect the validity of this program as a whole. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. I § 9)] Article II. Definitions 18.25.100 Definitions. These SMP definitions are derived from multiple sources. Definitions denoted with (*) are from this title. Definitions denoted with (**) are from Chapter 173-26 WAC. Definitions denoted with (***) are from Chapter 90.58 RCW. Definitions denoted with (****) are from the previously adopted county SMP (this chapter) and/or the proposed but not adopted 2000 Draft SMP. Definitions with no asterisk are derived from other sources or represent the best professional judgment of the authors. (1) A Definitions. (a) *“Abandon” means to terminate the use of a structure by an affirmative act such as changing to a new use; or to cease, terminate, or vacate a use or structure through nonaction. Except for ongoing agricultural activities, there shall be a presumption that a use has been abandoned if it is not undertaken, utilized, implemented or performed for a period of two years from the date of cessation/termination or vacation. (b) *“Abutting” means adjoining with a common boundary line or any portion thereof. (c) *“Accessory dwelling unit” means an additional dwelling unit either in or added to an existing single-family detached dwelling, or in a separate accessory structure on the same lot as the main structure, for use as a complete, independent living facility with provisions within the accessory dwelling unit for cooking, eating, sanitation and sleeping. Such a dwelling shall be considered an accessory use to the main dwelling and be clearly subordinate to the main dwelling. (d) “Accessory structure” means any detached structure that is optional, incidental and subordinate to a primary use and located on the same lot as the primary use. Boathouses, barns, storage sheds, workshops, gazebos, docks, piers, floats, buoys, beach access structures and other similar structures are examples that are typically accessory to a primary use. (e) *“Accessory use” means use of land or of a building or portion thereof incidental and subordinate to the principal use and located on the same lot with the principal use. Private moorage and other recreational uses are examples of uses that are accessory to residential development. (f) ****“Accretion” means the slow addition of land by the deposition of water-borne sediment through the net effect of wave action and longshore drift. (g) **“Act” means the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 (Chapter 90.58 RCW) as amended. (h) *“Adequate” means acceptable but not excessive. (i) *“Adjacent” means (in addition to abutting) that which is near or close; for example, an industrial district across the road or highway from a commercial district shall be considered as adjacent. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 9/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (j) *“Adjacent lands, shoreline” means lands adjacent to the shorelines of the state (outside of shoreline jurisdiction). See RCW 90.58.340. (k) *“Administrator” means the Jefferson County department of community development director or a designated representative. (l) *“Adverse impact or effect” means the result of a condition that creates, imposes, aggravates, or leads to inadequate, impractical, unsafe, or unhealthy conditions or reduces ecological functions or values. (m) ****“Advertising” means publicly displayed messages or signs, billboards, placards, or buildings that direct attention to promotion of a business, service, or product. (n) *“Aggrieved party” means a party of record who can demonstrate the following: (i) The land use decision will prejudice the person; (ii) The asserted interests are among those the county is required by county code, federal or state law or regulation to consider in making a land use decision; and (iii) A decision on appeal in favor of the person would substantially eliminate or redress the prejudice alleged to be caused by the land use decision. (o) **“Agricultural activities” means agricultural uses and practices including, but not limited to: producing, breeding, or increasing agricultural products; rotating and changing agricultural crops; allowing land used for agricultural activities to lie fallow in which it is plowed and tilled but left unseeded; allowing land used for agricultural activities to lie dormant as a result of adverse agricultural market conditions; allowing land used for agricultural activities to lie dormant because the land is enrolled in a local, state, or federal conservation program, or the land is subject to a conservation easement; conducting agricultural operations; maintaining, repairing, and replacing agricultural equipment; maintaining, repairing, and replacing agricultural facilities; provided, that the replacement facility is no closer to the shoreline than the original facility; and maintaining agricultural lands under production or cultivation. (p) **“Agricultural land” means those specific land areas on which agriculture activities are conducted as of the date of adoption of this master program pursuant to the state guidelines (Chapter 173-26 WAC) as evidenced by aerial photography or other documentation. After the effective date of the master program, land converted to agricultural use is subject to compliance with the requirements of the master program. (q) *“Agriculture, existing and ongoing” means any agricultural activity conducted on an ongoing basis on lands enrolled in the open space tax program for agriculture or designated as agricultural lands of long-term commercial significance on the official map of Comprehensive Plan land use designations; provided, that agricultural activities were conducted on those lands at any time during the five-year period preceding April 28, 2003. Agricultural use ceases when the area on which it is conducted is converted to a nonagricultural use. (r) *“Agriculture, new” means agricultural activities proposed or conducted after April 28, 2003, and that do not meet the definition of existing ongoing agriculture. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 10/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (s) *“Allowed use” means uses allowed subject to the provisions of this program, including meeting applicable performance and development standards; if a shoreline permit, building permit or other development permit (e.g., stormwater permit) is required, the use is subject to the project review and approval process. (t) “Alteration” means any human induced change in an existing condition of a shoreline and/or its buffer. Alterations include but are not limited to grading; filling; channelizing; dredging; clearing (vegetation); draining; constructing structures; compaction, excavation, or any other activity that changes the character of a site. (u) *“Alteration, nonconforming structures” means any change or rearrangement in the supporting members of existing buildings, such as bearing walls, columns, beams, girders, or interior partitions, as well as any changes in doors, windows, means of egress or ingress or any enlargement to or diminution of a building or structure, horizontally or vertically, or the moving of a building from one location to another. This definition excludes normal repair and maintenance, such as painting or roof replacement, but includes more substantial changes. (v) *“Alteration, nonconforming use” means the expansion, modification or intensification of a use that does not conform to the land use regulations of this program. (w) “Anadromous fish” means fish species that spend part of their lifecycle in saltwater, but return to freshwater to reproduce. (x) *“Appeal” means a request by an applicant or citizen that a decision made pursuant to this program be reviewed for its correctness and legality by another person, agency or court of law having jurisdiction to hear such an appeal. (y) *“Applicant” means the owner or owners of record of the property subject to a project permit application under this program, or authorized representative thereof. (z) *“Application” means the forms, plans and accompanying documents required for any project permit approval under this code. (aa) “Appurtenance, normal” means a structure or use that is necessarily connected to a primary use and is located landward of the ordinary high water mark. Normal appurtenances for residential development are garagesinclude a garage, deck, utilities, septic tankstank and drainfieldsdrainfield, as well as driveways, walkwaysdriveway, front walk, and fences, plus initial clearing and grading for a new residence which does not exceed 250 cubic yards and which does not involve placement of fill in any wetland or waterward of the ordinary high water mark. (bb) “Aquaculture” means the farming or culture of food fish, shellfish, or other aquatic plants or animals in freshwater or saltwater, and may include development such as structures, as well as use of natural spawning and rearing areas. Aquaculture does not include the harvest of wildstock geoduck on state-owned lands. Wildstock geoduck harvest is a fishery. (cc) *“Aquaculture activity” means actions directly pertaining to growing, handling, or harvesting of aquaculture produce. Examples include, but are not limited to, propagation, tank farms, hatcheries, incubators/nurseries, stocking, feeding, disease treatment, depuration facilities, waste disposal, water use, development of habitat and structures, sorting, wet storage, and staging. Excluded from Commented [LG5]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations clarify deck and other appurtenances Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 11/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. this definition are related commercial or industrial uses such as wholesale and retail sales, final processing and freezing. (dd) *“Aquaculture facility or farm” means any facility or tract of land used to culture aquatic products. Each geographically separate facility or tract of land used for aquaculture shall constitute a separate facility/farm; provided, that adjoining farms/facilities with separate operators shall be considered separate facilities/farms. (ee) *“Archaeological” means having to do with the scientific study of material remains of past human life and activities. (ff) “Archaeological resource/site” means a geographic locality including, but not limited to, submerged and submersible lands and the bed of the sea that contains physical evidence of an indigenous and subsequent culture including material remains of past human life, monuments, symbols, tools, facilities, graves, skeletal remains and technological byproducts: (i) That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or (ii) That are associated with the lives of significant persons in our past; or (iii) That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or (iv) That have yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory. (gg) “Archaeologist” is a person listed on the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historical Preservation list of qualified archaeologists. (hh) “Associated wetlands” means wetlands that are in proximity to tidal waters, lakes, rivers or streams that are subject to the Shoreline Management Act and either influence or are influenced by such waters. Factors used to determine proximity and influence include but are not limited to: location contiguous to a shoreline waterbody, formation by tidally influenced geohydraulic processes, presence of a surface connection including through a culvert or tide gate, location in part or whole within the 100-year floodplain of a shoreline, periodic inundation, and/or hydraulic continuity. (ii) *“Average grade level” means the average of the natural or existing topography of the portion of the lot, parcel, or tract of real property on that part of the lot to be occupied by the building or structure as measured by averaging the elevations at the center of all exterior walls of the proposed structure. In the case of structures to be built over the water, the average grade level shall be the elevation of the ordinary high water. (2) B Definitions. (a) *“Backshore” means the area landward of the high tide line wetted by storm tides but normally dry. It may be a narrow gravel berm below a sea bluff or a broader complex of berms, marshes, meadows, or dunes. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 12/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (b) *“Barrier beach” means an accretion shore form of sand and gravel that has been deposited by longshore drift in front of bluffs, bays, marshes, or estuaries, and functions like a storm barrier. (c) *“Bar” means a marine or river shore form similar to a spit or a hook, though generally not attached to the mainland during periods of high water. (d) *“Beach” means the zone of unconsolidated material that is moved by waves, wind and tidal currents. (e) *“Beach restoration and enhancement” means the alteration of terrestrial and tidal shorelines or submerged shorelines for the purposes of stabilization, recreational enhancement, or aquatic habitat creation or restoration. The materials used depend upon the intended use. For instance, to create a beach for recreational purposes, various grades of clean sand or pea gravel are often used. To restore or recreate a shore feature or an underwater aquatic environment (e.g., a reef), a combination of a rock matrix and sand or other materials may be used. To restore riparian habitat functions, native vegetation may be used. (f) *“Base flood” means the flood having a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year; also known as the 100-year flood, as shown on the FIRM maps. (g) *“Base flood elevation” means the elevation for which there is a one percent chance in any given year that flood levels will equal or exceed it. (h) “Beach access structure” means a structural pathway/walkway for purposes of providing pedestrian access to a beach or shoreline area, not for motorized vehicle access. It often includes a stairway, tram, stair tower, platform and/or elevated walkway anchored to the ground surface by structural means. (i) “Beds of navigable waters” or “bedlands” means those lands lying waterward of and below the line of navigability on rivers and lakes not subject to tidal flow, or extreme low tide mark in navigable tidal waters, or the outer harbor line where harbor area has been created (RCW 79.105.060(2)). (j) “Bedrock” means a general term for rock, typically hard, consolidated geologic material that underlies soil or other unconsolidated, superficial material or is exposed at the surface. (k) “Berm” or “protective berm” means one or several accreted linear mounds of sand and gravel generally paralleling the shore at or landward of OHWM; berms are normally stable because of material size or vegetation, and are naturally formed by net-shore drift. Also, a linear mound used to screen an adjacent activity (e.g., a parking lot) from transmitting excess noise and glare. (l) *“Best management practices (BMPs)” means systems of practices, schedules of activities, prohibitions, maintenance procedures, and management measures that prevent or minimize adverse impacts to the environment. (m) ****“Bioengineering” or “biostabilization” means the practice of using natural vegetative materials to stabilize shorelines and prevent erosion. This may include use of bundles of stems, root systems, or other living plant material, soft gabions, fabric or other soil stabilization techniques, and limited rock toe protection where appropriate. Bioengineering projects often include habitat Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 13/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. enhancement measures (e.g., anchored logs, root wads, etc.). Such techniques may be applied to creeks, rivers, lakes, reservoirs, and marine waters. Bioengineering may also be applied in upland areas away from the immediate shoreline. (n) *“Board (BOCC)” means the board of county commissioners for Jefferson County. Also referenced as board of commissioners or county commissioners. (o) *“Boat building and repair, commercial” means a commercial establishment where boats are constructed, dismantled, stored, serviced, or repaired, including maintenance work thereon. (p) “Boating facilities” means any public or private facility for storing or launching vessels or watercraft. This includes marinas, open water moorage and anchorage areas, boat launch ramps, boat lifts, mooring buoys, piers, floats and docks or any other similar single-user or shared-use facility for public recreational use or private residential use. For purposes of this program, boathouses, boat repair shops, and other upland boat storage structures are not considered boating facilities. (q) “Boathouse” means an enclosed structure designed and used exclusively for the storage of boats and boating equipment and not used as a dwelling unit. (r) ****“Boat launch” or “boat ramp” means a slab, pad, plank, rail, or graded slope used for launching boats by means of a trailer, hand, or mechanical device. (s) “Boat lift” is an in-water structure used for the dry berthing of vessels above the water level and lowering of vessels into the water periodically. A boat lift as herein defined is used to berth and launch a single vessel, suspended over the water’s surface. A boat lift is generally a manufactured unit without a canopy cover and may be placed in the water adjacent to a dock/pier or as a stand- alone structure. A boat lift may be designed either for boats or personal watercraft. A boat lift is to be differentiated from a hoist or crane used for the launching or haul-out of vessels. (t) “Bottom culture” means all aquaculture systems that are set on or securely and rigidly attached to the tidelands or bedlands and do not extend higher than six feet from the bottom (excluding hoists and similar apparatus). Bottom culture includes but is not limited to geoduck tubes, oyster longlines, clam netting, oyster rack and bags, and clam bags. Bottom culture does not include aquaculture suspended from rafts or buoys or contained in floating net pens. (u) ****“Breakwater” means an offshore structure that is generally built parallel to shore that may or may not be connected to land, and may be floating or stationary. Their primary purpose is to protect harbors, moorages and navigation activity from wave and wind action by creating stillwater areas along shore. A secondary purpose is to protect shorelines from wave caused erosion. Most breakwaters in the Pacific Coast are rip-rap mound construction. (v) “Buffer” or “buffer zone, strip, or area” means the area adjacent to a shoreline or critical area that separates and protects the area from adverse impacts associated with adjacent land uses. A buffer is measured horizontally and perpendicularly from the ordinary high water mark, and includes the three-dimensional airspace above. (w) “Building” means any structure used or intended for supporting or sheltering any use or occupancy as defined in the International Building Code. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 14/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (x) *“Building envelope” means: (i) A three-dimensional space in which a building or structure may be built meeting septic requirements; (ii) A plat restriction for the purpose of defining building coverage areas for individual lots, or for describing shoreline building setbacks; (iii) The buildable area of a lot, tract or parcel after applicable setbacks, buffers, easements and other restrictions on the lot, tract or parcel are taken into account. (y) ****“Bulkhead” means a wall usually constructed parallel to the shore at , above, or near, the ordinary high water mark with the primary purpose of containing and preventing the loss of soil caused by erosion or wave action. Bulkheads are usually constructed of rock, poured-in-place concrete, steel or aluminum sheet piling, wood or wood and structural steel combinations. They may be either thin structures penetrating deep into the ground, or more massive structures resting on the surface. (3) C Definitions. (a) *“Campground and camping facilities” means a facility in which sites are offered for persons using tents or other personal, portable overnight shelters. Campgrounds are for short-term stays and do not include trailer parks. (b) “Canopy” means the collective branches and foliage of a single tree or group of trees, aggregate or collective tree crowns. A canopy can be closed or partially closed as in a forest or woodland stand, or composed of both individual trees and closed canopy groups as in an urban forest canopy. (c) “Canopy cover” means the drip line area for an individual tree. For a stand of multiple trees it is the sum of the drip line areas of each tree less any overlap. (d) ****“Channel” means an open water either naturally or artificially created to convey water. (e) *“Channel migration zone (CMZ)” means an area within the lateral extent of likely stream channel movement that is subject to risk due to stream bank destabilization, rapid stream incision, stream bank erosion and shifts in the location of stream channels. “Channel migration zone” includes: (i) The historic channel migration zone (which is the footprint of the active channel documented through historical photographs and maps); and (ii) The avulsion hazard zone (which is an area with the potential for movement of the main river channel into a new location); and (iii) The erosion hazard area (which is an area outside the historic channel migration zone and the avulsion hazard zone, and includes an erosion setback for a 100-year period of time and a geotechnical setback to account for slope retreat to a stable angle of repose). Commented [AS6]: Modified as part of response to WDFW comment provided in email dated 3.26.21 Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 15/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (iv) “High channel migration hazard” (or “high risk CMZ”) for the Big Quilcene, Little Quilcene, Dosewallips, Duckabush, and Lower Hoh Rivers means those nondisconnected portions of the channel that are likely to migrate within a 50-year timeframe. (v) For the Big Quilcene, Little Quilcene, Dosewallips, and Duckabush Rivers, “moderate channel migration hazard” (or “moderate risk CMZ”) means those nondisconnected portions of the channel that are likely to migrate within a 50- to 100-year timeframe; and “low channel migration hazard” (or “low risk CMZ”) means those nondisconnected portions of the channel that are likely to migrate beyond a 100-year timeframe. (vi) For the Lower Hoh River, “moderately high hazard” (or “moderately high risk CMZ”) means those nondisconnected portions of the channel that are likely to migrate within a 50- to 100- year timeframe, “moderate hazard” means those nondisconnected portions of the channel that are likely to migrate beyond a 100-year timeframe, and “low hazard” means the nondisconnected portions of the channel that are less likely to be affected by channel migration, but is still at risk due to its location on the valley floor. “Channel migration zone” does not include disconnected migration areas, which are areas that have been disconnected from the river by legally existing artificial structure(s) that restrain channel migration (such as levees and transportation facilities build above or constructed to remain intact through the 100-year flood elevation), that are no longer available for migration by the river. “Channel migration zone” may exclude areas that lie behind a lawfully established flood protection facility that is likely to be maintained by existing programs for public maintenance consistent with designation and classification criteria specified by public rule. When a natural geologic feature affects channel migration, the channel migration zone width will consider such natural constraints. (f) “Channelization” means the straightening, relocation, deepening or lining of stream channels, including construction of continuous revetments or levees for the purpose of preventing gradual, natural meander progression. (g) “Clearing” means the destruction or removal, by hand or with mechanical means, of vegetative ground cover, shrubs or trees. Clearing may or may not include removing root material or topsoil. (h) “Cluster development” means a development design technique that groups or clusters buildings in specific areas on a site to minimize environmental impacts related to impervious surface, clearing and other impacts. (i) “Commercial fish” means those species of fish that are classified under the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Food Fish Classification as commercial fish (WAC 220-12-010). (j) *“Commercial recreational facility” means a place designed and equipped for sports and leisure- time activities that is operated as a business and open to the public for a fee. (k) *“Commercial sign” means any object, device, display or structure that is used for attracting attention to any commercial use, product, service, or activity. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 16/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (l) *“Commercial use” means a business use or activity at a scale greater than a home business or cottage industry involving retail or wholesale marketing of goods and services. Examples of commercial uses include offices and retail shops. (m) “Community dock” means a dock that serves multiple residential properties including upland and waterfront lots in a subdivision or similar community setting. See also “Shared use.” (n) *“Compatible” means uses or activities capable of existing together or in the vicinity of one another without disharmony or without generating effects or impacts which are disruptive to the normal use and enjoyment of surrounding property. (o) “Compensatory mitigation” means replacing resources or functions, at an equivalent or greater level, to offset unavoidable impacts that remain after all appropriate and practicable avoidance and minimization measures have been implemented. “Compensatory mitigation” includes, but is not limited to, creation, restoration, enhancement, preservation, and rehabilitation of wetlands, buffers, and other habitats or resources. (p) *“Comprehensive Plan” means the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. (q) “Conditional use permit (CUP)” means a permit issued by the county stating that the proposed land uses and development activities meet all criteria and all conditions of approval in accordance with the procedural requirements of this code. The intent of requiring a CUP is to accommodate site-specific allowances while ensuring program requirements are satisfied. As per Chapter 18.15 JCC, a CUP can be administrative (C(a)) or discretionary (C(d)). For this program, criteria are described in Article IX of this chapter and application review processes are described in Article X of this chapter. (r) “Conservation” means the prudent management of rivers, streams, wetlands, wildlife and other environmental resources in order to preserve and protect them. This includes the careful use of natural resources to prevent depletion or harm to the environment. (s) *“Conservation district” means a special purpose district, like a fire district or school district, organized in accordance with Chapter 89.08 RCW for the purpose of providing assistance to landowners for the conservation of renewable resources. (t) “Conservation easement” means a legal agreement that the property owner enters into to restrict uses of the land for purposes of natural resources conservation. The easement is recorded on a property deed, runs with the land, and is legally binding on all present and future owners of the property. (u) “Contaminant” means any chemical, physical, biological, or radioactive substance that does not occur naturally in ground water, air, or soil or that occurs at concentrations greater than those in the natural levels (Chapter 172-200 WAC). (v) *“County” means Jefferson County, Washington, its board, commissions, and departments. (w) ****“Covered moorage” means boat moorage, with or without walls, that has a roof to protect the vessel. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 17/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (x) ****Creek. See “Stream.” (y) “Critical areas” mean the following areas as designated in Chapter 18.22 JCC: (i) Critical aquifer recharge areas. (ii) Wetlands. (iii) Geologically hazardous areas. (iv) Frequently flooded areas. (v) Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas. (z) “Critical habitat” means habitat areas with which endangered, threatened, sensitive or monitored plant, fish, or wildlife species have a primary association (e.g., feeding, breeding, rearing of young, migrating). Such areas are identified herein with reference to lists, categories, and definitions promulgated by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife as identified in WAC 232-12-011 or 232-12-014; in the Priority Habitat and Species (PHS) program of the Department of Fish and Wildlife; or by rules and regulations adopted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, or other agency with jurisdiction for such designations. See also “Habitat of special significance.” (aa) “Cumulative impacts” or “cumulative effects” means the combined impacts of a proposed development action along with past impacts and impacts of reasonably foreseeable future development actions. (bb) “Current deflector” means an angled stub-dike, groin, or sheet-pile structure which projects into a stream channel to divert flood currents from specific areas, or to control downstream current alignment. (cc) *“Current use” means the use of land or improvements at the time of permit application. (4) D Definitions. (a) “Dam” means a barrier across a stream or river to confine or regulate flow or raise water levels for purposes such as flood or irrigation water storage, erosion control, power generation, or collection of sediment or debris. (b) *“DCD” means the Jefferson County department of community development. (c) “Deepwater habitats” means environments where surface water is permanent and often deep, so that water, rather than air, is the principal medium in which the dominate organisms live. (d) “Degrade” means to scale down in desirability or salability, to impair in respect to some physical property or to reduce in structure or function. (e) ****“Delta” or “river delta” means those lands formed as an aggradational feature by stratified clay, silt, sand and gravel deposited at the mouths of streams where they enter a quieter body of Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 18/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. water. The upstream extent of a river delta is that limit where it no longer forms distributary channels. (f) *“Density” means the quantity per unit area, such as the number of dwelling units per acre. (g) ***“Development” means a use consisting of the construction or exterior alteration of structures; dredging; drilling; dumping; filling; removal of any sand, gravel, or minerals; bulkheading; driving of piling; placing of obstructions; or any project of a permanent or temporary nature which interferes with the normal public use of the surface of the waters overlying lands subject to this program at any state of water level. “Development” does not include dismantling or removing structures if there is no other associated development or re-development. (h) ****“Developed shorelines” means those shoreline areas that are characterized by existing uses or structures located within shoreline jurisdiction. (i) “Development agreement” means a binding legal agreement between a local government and a property owner, managing agent or controlling entity that establishes the standards and other provisions that apply to, govern and vest the development, use and mitigation of real property for the specified duration of time, as consistent with local regulations and Chapter 36.70B RCW. (j) “Diameter at breast height (DBH)” means the diameter of a tree at four and one-half feet above the ground measured from the uphill side. (k) “Dike” means an artificial embankment placed at a stream mouth or delta to hold back sea water. (l) *“Director” means, unless otherwise specified, the director of the county’s department of community development (DCD) or the director’s designee. (m) *“Division of land” means the creation of any new lot or lots for the purpose of sale, lease, or transfer of ownership (see Chapter 18.35 JCC). (n) “Dock” means a fixed platform structure anchored in and floating upon a water body that abuts the shore to provide landing for water dependent recreation or moorage for vessels or watercraft and does not include above water storage. (o) *“Drainage” means surface water runoff; the removal of surface water or ground water from land by drains, grading, or other means, which include runoff controls to minimize erosion and sedimentation during and after construction or development. (p) “Dredge material disposal” means the depositing of dredged materials on land or into water bodies. (q) “Dredging” means the removal of earth from the bottom of a stream, river, lake, bay, or other water body. This does not include de minimis removal of sediment during harvest of geoduck clams or other shellfish. (r) **“Drift cell, drift sector, or littoral cell” means a particular reach of marine shore in which littoral drift may occur without significant interruption and which contains any natural sources of such drift and also accretion shore forms accreted by such drift. Commented [LG7]: 2017 b Periodic Checklist Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 19/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (s) “Drip line area” means the area measured from the trunk of the tree outward to a point at the perimeter of the outermost branch structure of the tree. (t) *“Driveway” means a strip of land which provides vehicular access to one or two lots. (u) ****“Dune” means a hill or ridge of sand piled up by the wind and/or wave action. (v) “Dwelling unit” means one or more rooms or structures designed for occupancy by an individual or family for living and sleeping purposes. (5) E Definitions. (a) **“Ecological functions” or “shoreline functions” means the work performed or role played by the physical, chemical, and biological processes that contribute to the maintenance of the aquatic and terrestrial environments that constitute the shoreline’s natural ecosystem. See WAC 173-26- 200(2)(c). Functions include, but are not limited to, habitat diversity and food chain support for fish and wildlife, ground water recharge and discharge, high primary productivity, low flow stream water contribution, sediment stabilization and erosion control, storm and flood water attenuation and flood peak desynchronization, and water quality enhancement through biofiltration and retention of sediments, nutrients, and toxicants. These beneficial roles are not listed in order of priority. (b) ****“Ecologically intact shorelines” means those shoreline areas that retain the majority of their natural shoreline functions and values, as evidenced by vegetation and shoreline configuration. Generally, but not necessarily, ecologically intact shorelines are largely free of structural shoreline modifications, structures, and intensive human activities. (c) “Ecology” means Washington State Department of Ecology. (d) **“Ecosystem processes” means the suite of naturally occurring physical and geologic processes of erosion, transport, and deposition; and specific chemical processes that shape landforms within a specific shoreline ecosystem and determine both the types of habitat and the associated ecological functions. (e) “Emergency activities” are those activities that require immediate action within a time too short to allow full compliance with this program due to an unanticipated and imminent threat to public health, safety or the environment (see WAC 173-27-040). Emergency construction does not include development of new permanent protective structures where none previously existed. All emergency construction shall be consistent with the policies of Chapter 90.58 RCW and this program. As a general matter, flooding or other seasonal events that can be anticipated and may occur but that are not imminent are not an emergency. (f) *“Endangered species” means a species which is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range, as classified by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Washington Department of Natural Resources, or the Federal Endangered Species Act. (g) “Enhancement” means actions performed within an existing degraded shoreline and/or buffer to intentionally increase or augment one or more functions or values of the existing area. Enhancement actions include, but are not limited to, increasing plant diversity and cover, increasing Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 20/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. wildlife habitat and structural complexity (snags, woody debris), installing environmentally compatible erosion controls, or removing non-indigenous plant or animal species. (h) *“Erosion” means the detachment and movement of soil or rock by water, wind, ice, or gravity. (i) *“Erosion hazard areas” means areas characterized by soils identified in the USDA Jefferson County Soil Survey as having severe water erosion hazards. (j) *“Essential public facilities” means those important and necessary facilities which provide essential services that are typically difficult to site, such as airports, state educational facilities, state or regional transportation facilities, state and local correctional facilities, solid waste handling facilities, and in-patient facilities including substance-abuse facilities, mental health facilities, and group homes (RCW 36.70A.200). They do not necessarily include all public facilities or services; they may be, but are not necessarily, publicly owned. Essential public facilities in Jefferson County include airports, large-scale transportation facilities, solid waste handling and disposal facilities, correctional facilities, in-patient treatment facilities including substance-abuse facilities and mental health facilities, state-owned educational facilities, and wastewater treatment plants. (k) “Estuary” means a semi-enclosed coastal water body connected to a larger body of saltwater with one or more streams/rivers flowing into it. Estuaries are typically the mouths of rivers and have brackish water. (l) *“Excavation” means the mechanical removal of earth, including soil, rocks, bedrock, and/or root material from areas landward of the OHWM of a waterbody. (m) “Exempt development” refers to activities which the legislature identified as not requiring shoreline substantial development permits. Actions in shoreline jurisdiction not requiring such permits are required to be consistent with all the relevant policies and regulations in RCW 90.58.030 and WAC 173-27(040). A letter from the county must be obtained certifying that the development is exempt. Exempt uses may still require conditional use and/or variance permits. (n) *“Existing use” means the use of a lot or structure or improvements at the time of the enactment of this code, unless otherwise specified. (o) “Experimental aquaculture” means aquaculture that cultivates new species, or uses growing methods or harvesting techniques that have not previously been used in the state of Washington and that differ significantly from common practice. (p) *“Extraction” means the commercial removal of naturally occurring materials from the earth, excluding water. (q) ***“Extreme low tide (ELT)” means the lowest line of the land reached by a receding tide. This is the line as estimated by the federal government below which it might reasonably be expected that the tide would not ebb. In the Puget Sound area generally, this point is estimated by the federal government to be a point in elevation 4.50 feet below the datum plane of mean lower low water (0.0). Along the Pacific Ocean and in the bays fronting thereon and the Strait of Juan de Fuca, the elevation ranges down to a minus 3.5 feet in several locations. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 21/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (6) F Definitions. (a) ****“Fair market value (FMV)” of a development means the open market bid price for conducting the work, using the equipment and facilities, and purchase of the goods, services and materials necessary to accomplish the development. This would normally equate to the cost of hiring a contractor to undertake the development from start to finish, including the cost of labor, materials, equipment and facility usage, transportation and contractor overhead and profit. The fair market value of the development shall include the fair market value of any donated, contributed or found labor, equipment or materials. (b) **“Feasible” means, for the purpose of this program, that an action, such as a development project, mitigation, or preservation requirement, meets all of the following conditions: (i) The action can be accomplished with technologies and methods that have been used in the past in similar circumstances, or studies or tests have demonstrated in similar circumstances that such approaches are currently available and likely to achieve the intended results; (ii) The action provides a reasonable likelihood of achieving its intended purpose; and (iii) The action does not physically preclude achieving the project’s primary intended legal use. In cases where these guidelines require certain actions unless they are infeasible, the burden of proving infeasibility is on the applicant. In determining an action’s infeasibility, the reviewing agency may weigh the action’s relative public costs and public benefits, considered in the short- and long-term time frames. (c) (i) *“Feasible alternative” means an alternative that: (A) Meets the requirements of federal, state, and local laws and regulations; (B) Attains most or all of the basic objectives of the project; (C) Is technically and technologically possible; (D) Can be accomplished at a reasonable cost; (E) Can be accomplished in a reasonable amount of time; and (F) Adverse environmental, health, and safety effects are no greater than those of the original proposal. (ii) A determination of what is reasonable or feasible is made by the decision-making body on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the: (A) Probable intensity, severity, and cumulative impacts of the original proposal and alternative approaches, and opportunity for the avoidance or reduction in the number, intensity, or severity of significant impacts, or of the aggregate adverse impact; (B) Risk of upset conditions (i.e., the risk that the control and mitigation measures will fail, be overwhelmed, or exceed allowed limits) and the potential severity of the impact should control or mitigation measures be ineffective or fail; Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 22/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (C) Capital and operating costs; (D) Period of time to accomplish, costs of additional time or delay, and time constraints for completion; and (E) Location and site-specific factors, such as seasonal or topographic constraints, environmentally sensitive areas and habitats, site accessibility, and local community concerns. (d) ****“Feeder bluff” means anyan eroding coastal headland or hill with a broad, steep face experiencing periodic erosion from waves, sliding or slumpingbluff that, through natural transportation, delivers a significant amount of sediment to the beach over an extended period of time and contributes eroded earth, sand or gravel material via a driftway to an accretion shoreform.to the local littoral sediment budget. (e) “Fill” means the addition of solid or semi-solid material such as soil, sand, rock, gravel, sediment, wood chips, mining overburden, earth retaining structure, or other material used to create any structure or infrastructure or when placed changes the elevation or grade of a receiving site. (f) “Fill material” means any solid or semi-solid material such as soil, sand, rock, gravel, sediment, wood chips, mining overburden, earth retaining structure, or other material from mining or other excavation activities, and materials used to create any structure or infrastructure, that when placed, changes the grade or elevation of the receiving site. (g) “Filling” means the act of transporting or placing by any manual or mechanical means fill material from, to, or on any soil surface, including temporary stockpiling of fill material. (h) “Finfish” means a vertebrate organism of the classes Osteichthyes, Agnatha, or Chondrichthyes possessing a bony and/or cartilaginous inner skeleton, including all stages of development and the bodily parts of the fish (RCW 77.08.22). Examples include, but are not limited to, salmon, trout, ling cod, rock fish, halibut, sole, sablefish, perch, pollock, whiting, tilapia, carp, lamprey, sturgeon, sharks, skates, and rays. In comparison, see “Shellfish.” (i) “Fire hazard” means the accumulation of combustible materials in such a condition as to be readily ignited and in such a quantity as to create a hazard from fire to nearby structures, life and property. (j) “Fish habitat” means a complex of physical, chemical, and biological conditions that provide the life supporting and reproductive needs of a species or life stage of fish. Although the habitat requirements of a species depend on its age and activity, the basic components of fish habitat in rivers, streams, ponds, and nearshore areas include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) Clean water and appropriate temperatures for spawning, rearing, and holding; (ii) Adequate water depth and velocity for migrating, spawning, rearing, and holding, including off-channel habitat; (iii) Abundance of bank and in-stream structures to provide hiding and resting areas and stabilize stream banks and beds; Commented [LG8]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations definition taken from https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/documents/14060 16.pdf Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 23/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (iv) Appropriate substrates for spawning and embryonic development. For stream and lake dwelling fishes, substrates range from sands and gravel to rooted vegetation or submerged rocks and logs. Generally, substrates must be relatively stable and free of silts or fine sand; (v) Presence of riparian vegetation as defined in this article. Riparian vegetation creates a transition zone, which provides large woody debris (LWD), shade, and food sources of aquatic and terrestrial insects for fish; (vi) Unimpeded passage (suitable gradient and lack of barriers) for upstream and downstream migrating juveniles and adults. (k) “Float” means a fixed platform structure anchored in and floating upon a water body that does not connect to the shore, and that provides landing for water-dependent recreation or moorage for vessels or watercraft, and that does not include above water storage. (l) “Floating aquaculture” means aquaculture systems that suspend aquatic organisms in the water column using buoys, rafts, docks, piers or other structure and that extend more than three feet from the bottom into the water column. Floating aquaculture is synonymous with hanging aquaculture. (m) “Floating house”dwellings include the following: (i) "Floating home" means a single-family dwelling unit constructed on a float, that is moored, anchored, or otherwise secured in waters, and is not a vessel, even though it may be capable of being towed. (ii) "Floating on-water residence" means any floating structure that is other than a floating home, that: (i) Is designed, or has been substantially and structurally remodeled or redesigned, to serve primarily as a residence. “Floating houses” include house boats, house barges, or any floating structures that serve used primarily as a residence on the water and do not qualify as a vessel. A floating structure that is used as a residencehas detachable utilities; and is capable of navigation, but is not designed primarily for navigation, nor is normally capable of self propulsion and (ii) whose owner or primary occupant has held an ownership interest in space in a marina, or has held a lease or sublease to use as a means of transportation, is a floating house, not a vessel per WAC 332 -30- 103.space in a marina, since a date prior to July 1, 2014. (n) *“Flood” or “flooding” means the temporary inundation of normally dry land areas from the overflow of inland or tidal waters or from the unusual and rapid accumulation or runoff of surface waters. (o) “Flood control” means all development on rivers and streams designed to retard bank erosion, to reduce flooding of adjacent lands, to control or divert stream flow, or to create a reservoir, including but not limited to revetments, dikes, levees, channelization, dams, weirs, flood and tidal gates. Excluded are water pump apparatus. (p) **“Floodplain” is synonymous with 100-year floodplain and means that land area susceptible to inundation with a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. The limit of Commented [LG9]: 2014.a Periodic Checklist Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 24/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. this area shall be based upon flood ordinance regulation maps or a reasonable method which meets the objectives of the Act. (q) “Floodplain management” means a long-term program to reduce flood damages to life and property and to minimize public expenses due to floods through a comprehensive system of planning, development regulations, building standards, structural works, and monitoring and warning systems. (r) “Floodway” means the area of a river valley that conveys flood waters with reasonable regularity, although not necessarily annually. At a minimum, the floodway is that whichthat has been established in Federal Emergency Management Act flood insurance rate maps or Federal Emergency Management Act floodway maps. Other data and information, including topography, changes in soil or vegetation, and other indicators of past flooding, may be used to define and map a floodway that meets the objectives of the Shoreline Management Act, Chapter 90.58 RCW. The floodway shalldoes not include those lands that can reasonably be expected to be protected from 100-year flood waters by flood control devices maintained by or maintained under license from the federal government, the state, or a political subdivision of the state. (s) “Forest land” means all land that is capable of supporting a merchantable stand of timber and is not being actively used, developed, or converted in a manner that is incompatible with timber production. (t) *“Forest management” means forest practices pertaining to protecting, producing, and harvesting timber for economic use. (u) *“Forest practice” means any activity conducted on or directly pertaining to forest land and relating to growing or harvesting of timber, or the processing of timber, including but not limited to: road and trail construction and maintenance; harvest, final and intermediate; precommercial thinning; reforestation; fertilization; prevention and suppression of diseases and insects; salvage of trees; and brush control. (v) *“Forest practice, conversion” means the conversion of land to an active use incompatible with timber growing and where future nonforest uses will be located on currently forested land. (w) *“Frequently flooded areas” means lands subject to a one percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year. (x) “Function assessment” or “functions and values assessment” means a set of procedures, applied by a qualified consultant, to identify the ecological functions being performed in a shoreline or critical area, usually by determining the presence of certain characteristics, and determining how well the area is performing those functions. Function assessments can be qualitative or quantitative and may consider social values potentially provided by an area. Function assessment methods must be consistent with best available science. (7) G Definitions. (a) “Gabions” means works composed of masses of rock, rubble, or masonry tightly enclosed usually by wire mesh so as to form massive blocks. They are used to form walls on beaches to retard wave erosion or as foundations for breakwaters or jetties. Commented [LG10]: 2007 a Periodic Checklist Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 25/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (b) “Game fish” means those species of fish that are classified by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife as game fish (WAC 232-12-019). (c(c) “Gangplank” means a structure between a pier and float/dock which can adjust its angle based on changes in water elevation, allowing access to the float at all times; also called a gangway. (d) “Genetically modified organism (GMO)” means a plant, animal or microorganism whose genetic material has been manipulated by a molecular biological engineering technique (such as recombinant DNA technology using transgenic or cisgenic methods) resulting in a genetically distinct organism with an altered hereditary pattern of protein production by the chromosomes. Selective breeding, cross breeding, and creation of polyploidy are not included. (de) *“Geologically hazardous areas” means areas that because of their susceptibility to erosion, sliding, earthquake, or other geological events are not suited to the siting of commercial, residential, or industrial development consistent with public health or safety concerns. (ef) “Geologically unstable” means the relative instability of a shoreform or land form for development purposes over the long term or the intended life of any proposed structure. Soil, slope, ground or surface water, other geologic conditions, vegetation and effects of development are common factors that contribute to instability. Areas characterized by banks or bluffs composed of unconsolidated alluvial or glacial deposits (till and drift material), severely fractured bedrock, active and substantial erosion, substantially deformed trees and shrubs, or active or inactive earth slides are likely to be considered geologically unstable. (fg) “Geotechnical report” or “geotechnical analysis” means a scientific study or evaluation that includes a description of the ground and surface hydrology and geology, the affected land form and its susceptibility to mass wasting, erosion, and other geologic hazards or processes, conclusions and recommendations regarding the effect of the proposed development on geologic conditions, the adequacy of the site to be developed, the impacts of the proposed development, alternative approaches to the proposed development, and measures to mitigate potential site-specific and cumulative geological and hydrological impacts of the proposed development, including the potential adverse impacts to adjacent and down-current properties. Geotechnical reports shall conform to accepted technical standards and must be prepared by qualified engineers or geologists who are knowledgeable about the regional and local geology. (gh) *“Grade, existing” means the elevation of the ground or site prior to any work being done or any changes being made to the ground or site. (hi) *“Grade, finished” means the final elevation of the ground level after development. (ij) “Gradient” means a degree of inclination, or a rate of ascent or descent, of an inclined part of the earth’s surface with respect to the horizontal; the steepness of a slope. It is expressed as a ratio (vertical to horizontal), a fraction (such as meters/kilometers or feet/miles), a percentage (of horizontal distance), or an angle (in degrees). (jk) *“Grading” means stripping, cutting, filling, or stockpiling earth to create new grade. (kl) “Groin” means a wall-like structure extending on an angle waterward from the shore. Its purpose is to build or preserve an accretion shoreform or berm on its updrift side by trapping Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 26/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. littoral drift. Groins are relatively narrow in width but vary greatly in length. Groins are sometimes built in series as a system, and may be permeable or impermeable, high or low, and fixed or adjustable. (lm) “Ground water” means all water that exists beneath the land surface or beneath the bed of any stream, lake or reservoir, or other body of surface water within the boundaries of the state, whatever may be the geological formation or structure in which such water stands or flows, percolates or otherwise moves (Chapter 90.44 RCW). (mn) *“Growth Management Act (GMA)” means the State of Washington Growth Management Act, Chapter 36.70A RCW, as amended. (no) ****“Guidelines” means those standards adopted under Chapter 173-26 WAC, as amended, or any successor regulations thereof, that serve as standards for implementation of the policy of Chapter 90.58 RCW for regulations of uses of the shorelines, and that provide criteria to local governments and the Department of Ecology in developing master programs. (8) H Definitions. (a) *“Habitat” means the place or type of site where a plant or animal naturally or normally lives and grows. (b) “Habitat of special significance” means eelgrass beds, kelp beds, rocky reef habitat, geoduck beds, hardshell clam beds, habitat having significant populations of or which are important to the feeding, reproduction or other life stages of Dungeness crabs, herring, lingcod/greenling, true cod, soles and flounders, rock fishes, cabezon and other large sculpins, or sea perch, wildlife refuges and habitats of endangered or threatened species, and other habitat that meets the 1986 Recommended Interim Guidelines for Salmon Net -Pen Culture in Puget Sound, as determined on a case-by-case basis in consultation with Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. See also “Critical habitat.” (c) Hanging Aquaculture. See “Floating aquaculture.” (d) ****“Harbor area” means the area of navigable tidal waters as determined in Section 1 of Article 15 of the Washington State Constitution, which is forever reserved for landings, wharves, streets, and other conveniences of navigation and commerce. Harbor areas exist between the inner and outer harbor lines as established by the state harbor line commission. Harbor areas are managed by the Department of Natural Resources for the conveniences of navigation and commerce (RCW 79.105.060(5)). (e) “Hazard tree” means any tree that presents a risk to persons or property due to a high probability of falling in the near future because of a debilitating disease, a structural defect, a root ball significantly exposed, or having been exposed to windthrow within the past 10 years. Hazardous trees include, but are not limited to, conditions where a permanent, primary structure or appurtenant or accessory structure is within one and one-half tree lengths of the base of the trunk. Where not immediately apparent to the administrator, the hazard tree determination shall be made after review of a report prepared by a certified arborist or forester. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 27/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (f) “Hazardous area” means any shoreline area which is hazardous for intensive human use or structural development due to inherent and/or predictable physical conditions; such as but not limited to geologically hazardous areas, frequently flooded areas, and coastal high hazard areas. (g) “Hazardous materials” means any substance containing such elements or compounds which when discharged in any quantity in shorelines present an imminent and/or substantial danger to public health or welfare; including, but not limited to: fish, shellfish, wildlife, water quality, and other shoreline features and property. (h) *“Hazardous waste” means those solid wastes designated by 40 CFR Part 261, and regulated as hazardous waste by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. (i) “Hearings Board” means the State Shorelines Hearings Board referenced in RCW 90.58.170. (j) *“Height, building” means the vertical distance from grade plane to the average height of the highest roof surface (cf., International Building Code). (k) ****“Historic” means having considerable importance or influence in history; historical. (l) “Historic preservation professionals” means those individuals who hold a graduate degree in architectural history, art history, historic preservation, or closely related field, with coursework in American architectural history, or a bachelor’s degree in architectural history, art history, historic preservation or closely related field plus one of the following: (i) At least two years of full-time experience in research, writing, or teaching in American architectural history or restoration architecture with an academic institution, historical organization or agency, museum, or other professional institution; or (ii) Substantial contribution through research and publication to the body of scholarly knowledge in the field of American architectural history. (m) *“Historic site, structure or landmark” means a site, structure or building of outstanding archaeological, historical or cultural significance. This is shown by its designation as such by the National or Washington State Register of Historic Places, designation as an historic landmark, or any such structure or feature for which the State Historic Preservation Officer has made a determination of significance pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. (n) *“Hotel” (or “lodge”) means a commercial building in which lodging is provided and offered to the public for compensation, and which is open to transient guests, and is not a motel or bed and breakfast inn. (o) *“Household” means one or more related or unrelated persons occupying a dwelling unit. (p) “Hydraulic project approval (HPA)” means a permit issued by the State Department of Fish and Wildlife for modifications to waters of the state in accordance with Chapter 75.20 RCW. (9) I Definitions. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 28/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (a) *“Illegal use” means any use of land or a structure which is inconsistent with current codes and/or was inconsistent with previous codes in effect when the use or structure was established. An illegal use is different than a nonconforming use. (See also “Nonconforming.”) (b) “Impervious surface” means a hard surface area that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to, roof tops, walkways, patios, driveways, parking lots or storage areas, concrete or asphalt paving, gravel roads, packed earthen materials, and other surfaces. Open, uncovered retention/detention facilities shall not be considered impervious surfaces for purposes of this program. Open, uncovered retention/detention facilities shall be considered impervious surfaces for purposes of runoff modeling. (c(c) “Important, Sensitive and Unique Areas (ISUs)” means specific areas in state waters that meet one or more of the following criteria: (i) Areas that are environmentally sensitive or contain unique or sensitive species or biological communities that must be conserved and warrant protective measures [RCW 43.372.040(6)(c)]. (ii) Areas with known sensitivity and where the best available science indicates the potential for offshore development to cause irreparable harm to the habitats, species, or cultural resources. (iii) Areas with features that have limited, fixed and known occurrence. (iv) Areas with inherent risk or infrastructure (e.g. buoys or cables) that are incompatible with new ocean uses. (d) *“Incidental” means subordinate to, minor in significance, and bearing a reasonable relationship with the primary use. (de) *“Incompatible” means uses and activities that are not compatible. (ef) “Industrial development” means facilities for processing, manufacturing, and storage of finished or semi-finished goods, including but not limited to oil, metal or mineral product refining, power generating facilities, including hydropower, ship building and major repair, storage and repair of large trucks and other large vehicles or heavy equipment, related storage of fuels, commercial storage and repair of fishing gear, warehousing construction contractors’ offices and material/equipment storage yards, wholesale trade or storage, and log storage on land or water, together with necessary accessory uses such as parking, loading, and waste storage and treatment. Excluded from this definition are mining including on-site processing of raw materials, and off-site utility, solid waste, road or railway development, and methane digesters that are accessory to an agricultural use. (fg) “Industrial pier” means a fixed platform structure supported by piles in a water body that abuts the shore to provide access to or moorage of vessels or watercraft for industrial purposes, such as, but not limited to, mining, processing raw materials, manufacturing products from natural resources, and operations that include hazardous substances. Commented [LG11]: Respond to October 2020 Ecology Checklist addressing 2018 Marine Spatial Plan Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 29/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (gh) ****“Industry” means the production, processing, manufacturing, or fabrication of goods or materials. Warehousing and storage of materials or production is considered part of the industrial process. (hi) *“Infiltration” means the downward entry of water into the immediate surface of soil. (ij) “Infrastructure” means existing installed facilities and services including capital facilities such as water supply, sewage disposal, and storm drainage systems, and transportation facilities such as public roads. (jk) ****“Inner harbor line” means a line located and established in navigable tidal waters between the line of ordinary high water and the outer harbor line, constituting the inner boundary of the harbor area. (.(k) ****“In-stream structure” means a human-made structure placed within a stream or river waterward of the ordinary high water mark that either causes or has the potential to cause water impoundment, or the diversion, obstruction, or modification of water flow. In-stream structures may include those for hydroelectric generation, irrigation, water supply, flood control, transportation, utility service, transmission, fisheries enhancement, or other purposes. (l) *“Intensification of nonconforming use” means any increase or expansion in the quality or quantity of products, goods, services, structures or adverse impacts upon parcels within the vicinity of the nonconforming use produced, generated, served, created or performed at the site of the legal nonconforming use by the owner or occupant of that legal nonconforming use. (m) *“Intensive” means highly concentrated, very large, or considerable, in terms of Jefferson County standards and environment. (n) *“International Building Code (IBC)” means the building code officially adopted by Jefferson County. (o) ****“Intertidal” means the area waterward of the ordinary high water mark and landward of the line of extreme low tide. (p) “Invasive species” means a species that is (i) nonnative (or alien) to Jefferson County and (ii) whose introduction causes or is likely to cause economic or environmental harm or harm to human health. Invasive species can be plants, animals, and other organisms (e.g., microbes). Human actions are the primary means of invasive species introductions. Includes noxious weeds that, when established, are highly destructive, competitive, or difficult to control by cultural or chemical practices, as per RCW 17.10.010. (q) “In-water finfish aquaculture” means the farming or culture of vertebrate or cartilaginous food fish for market sale when raised in facilities located waterward of the ordinary high water mark in freshwater or saltwater water bodies, in either open-flow or contained systems. This includes net pens, sea cages, bag cages and similar floating/hanging containment structures and is intended to reflect the definition of “marine finfish rearing facilities” (RCW 90.48.220), but does not include temporary restoration/enhancement facilities used expressly to improve populations of native stocks and that meet the definition of “watershed restoration project” per RCW 89.08.460. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 30/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (r) ****“Island” means a land mass completely surrounded by water. (10) J Definitions. (a) ****“Jetty” means a structure generally perpendicular to the shore, extending through or past the intertidal zone. Jetties are built singly or in pairs at a harbor entrance or river mouth mainly to prevent accretion from littoral drift in an entrance channel. Jetties also serve to protect channels from storm waves or cross currents and to stabilize inlets through barrier beaches. Most jetties are of rip-rapped mound construction. (b) Joint Use Dock. See “Community dock.” (11) No K definitions. (12) L Definitions. (a) “Lake” means a body of standing water in a depression of land or expanded part of a stream, of 20 acres or greater in total area. A lake is bounded by the OHWM, or where a stream enters the lake, the extension of the lake’s OHWM within the stream. A lake is generally distinguished from marshes, bogs, and swamps by its greater depth. (b) “Land disturbing activity” means any activity that results in movement of earth, or a change in the existing soil cover (both vegetative and nonvegetative) and/or the existing soil topography. Land disturbing activities include, but are not limited to, clearing, grading, filling, compaction, and excavation. (c) Landfill. See “Filling.” (d) “Landslide” means a general term covering a wide variety of mass movement landforms and processes involving the downslope transport, under gravitational influence, of soil and rock material en masse; included are debris flows, debris avalanches, earthflows, mudflows, slumps, mudslides, rock slides, and rock falls. (e) *“Landslide hazard” areas means areas potentially subject to risk of mass movement due to a combination of geologic, topographic, and hydrologic factors. (f) *“Landward” means to or toward the land. (g(g) “Lateral” means of, at, toward, or from the side. (h) “Levee” means a natural or artificial embankment on the bank of a river or stream for the purpose of keeping floodwaters from inundating adjacent land. Some levees have revetments on their sides. (hi) “Liberal construction” means that the interpretation of this document shall not only be based on the actual words and phrases used in it, but also by taking its deemed or stated purpose into account. (i(j) Lift. See “Boat lift.” Commented [LG12]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations (18.25.100 Lateral) Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 31/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (k) “Live-aboard” means a seaworthy vessel that was designed primarily for navigation but is used as a residence. A boat or other floating structure is a residence if it is occupied 30 out of 45 days or 90 out of 365 days while moored or anchored in the same area, or if the local government, the marina, or the occupant of the boat defines it as a residence. The phrase “in the same area” means within a radius of one mile of any location where the same vessel previously moored or anchored. A vessel that is occupied and is moored or anchored in the same area, but not for the number of days described in this subsection, is considered a recreational or transient vessel (WAC 332-30-106). (jl) “Log storage” means the water storage of logs in rafts or otherwise prepared for shipment in water-borne commerce, but does not include the temporary holding of logs to be taken directly into a vessel or processing facility (RCW 79.105.060(10)). (km) *“Logging” means activities related to and conducted for purposes of harvesting or processing timber. See also “Forest practices.” (ln) *“Long-term commercial significance” means lands with the growing capacity, productivity, soil composition, and economic viability for long-term agricultural, mineral or silvicultural production. (mo) *“Lot” means a designated tract, parcel or area of land established by plat, subdivision, or as otherwise permitted by law, to be separately owned, and utilized. The area below the ordinary high water mark may not be considered a part of the lot area for all purposes. (np) *“Lot of record” means an undeveloped lot, tract or parcel of land shown on an officially recorded short plat or long plat or a parcel of land officially recorded or registered as a unit of property and described by platted lot number or by metes and bounds and lawfully established for conveyancing purposes on the date of recording of the instrument first referencing the lot. The term lot of record does not imply that the lot was created in conformity with the legal regulatory requirements for subdivision of property in accordance with Chapter 58.17 RCW or Chapter 18.35 JCC. (oq) “Low intensity land use” means a land use that has limited impact upon the land, resources and adjoining properties in terms of the scale of development, and frequency, amount, or concentration of use. Low intensity uses are mostly passive uses that do not substantially consume resources or leave noticeable or lasting adverse effects. (13) M Definitions. (a) “Maintenance and repair” means work required to keep existing improvements in their existing operational state. This does not include any modification that changes the character, scope, or size of the original structure, facility, utility or improved area. (b) “Marina” means a wet moorage and/or dry storage facility for multiple pleasure crafts and/or commercial crafts where goods or services related to boating may be sold commercially. Launching facilities and covered moorage may also be included. Marinas may be open to the general public or restricted on the basis of property ownership or membership. (c(c) The Marine Spatial Plan for Washington’s Pacific Coast (MSP) is a planning document designed to address new ocean use development off Washington’s Pacific coast that had not been previously permitted or approved prior to the adoption of the plan in June 2018. The MSP uses a series of data, Commented [LG13]: Respond to October 2020 Ecology Checklist addressing 2018 Marine Spatial Plan Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 32/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. maps, and analyses in combination with a management framework to evaluate potential impacts from new ocean use projects on existing uses and resources, based on the principles and criteria outlined in the Ocean Resources Management Act (ORMA) [RCW 43.143.030(2)] and the Ocean Management Guidelines [WAC 173-26-360]. It applies a coordinated decision-making process between various governments, tribes, and stakeholders, and includes additional siting recommendations and fisheries protection standards. These principles have been incorporated into this SMP. See Ecology Publication No. 17-06-027, Revised June 2018 (https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/documents/1706027.pdf and https://msp.wa.gov/) (d) “Marine trades” include a variety of sectors including ship and boat building/maintenance/repair, passenger ship/ charter ship activities, fishing and seafood processing, marina and recreational boating, and maritime education and training. (e) “Mass wasting” means downslope movement of soil and rock material by gravity. This includes soil creep, erosion, and various types of landslides, not including bed load associated with natural stream sediment transport dynamics. (df) *“Master planned resort (MPR)” means a self-contained and fully integrated planned unit development in a setting of significant natural amenities, with primary focus on destination resort facilities consisting of short-term visitor accommodations associated with a range of on-site indoor or outdoor recreational facilities. A master planned resort may include other residential uses within its boundaries, but only if the residential uses are integrated into and support the on-site recreational nature of the resort (cf., RCW 36.70A.360). (eg) “May” means the action is allowable, provided it conforms to the provisions of this program. (fh) “Mean annual flow” means the average flow of a river or stream (measured in cubic feet per second) from measurements taken throughout the year. If available, flow data for the previous 10 years should be used in determining mean annual flow. (gi) “Minerals” means clay, coal, gravel, industrial minerals, metallic substances, peat, sand, stone, topsoil, and any other similar solid material or substance to be excavated from natural deposits on or in the earth for commercial, industrial, or construction use. (hj) (i) “Mining” or “mining operations” means, in accordance with RCW 78.44.031, all mine-related activities, exclusive of reclamation, that include, but are not limited to activities that affect noise generation, air quality, surface and ground water quality, quantity, and flow, glare, pollution, traffic safety, ground vibrations, and/or significant or substantial impacts commonly regulated under land use provisions. Mining specifically includes: (A) Extraction of rock, stone, gravel, sand, earth, and other minerals; (B) Blasting, equipment maintenance, sorting, crushing, and loading; (C) On-site mineral processing including asphalt or concrete batching, concrete recycling, and other aggregate recycling; and Commented [LG14]: Task Force Scoping Item D Commented [LG15R14]: Term is used elsewhere in SMP amendments. See checklist, added source link: http://ptmta.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/2018- Jefferson-County-Marine-Trades-Impact-Report.pdf. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 33/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (D) All methods of transporting minerals to and from the mine (including conveyors, piers, and barges), on-site road maintenance, maintenance of roads used extensively for surface mining activities, traffic safety, and traffic control. (ii) Mining shall not include the following: (A) Excavation and grading at building construction sites where such construction is authorized by a valid building permit; or (B) Excavation and grading in public rights-of-way for the purpose of on-site road construction, or in private rights-of-way for the same purpose if authorized by the county; or (C) Excavation and grading for the purpose of developing ponds or manure lagoons for agricultural purposes; or (D) Excavation and grading in connection with and at the site of any creek, river, or flood- control or storm drainage channel for the purpose of enlarging hydraulic capacity or changing the location or constructing a new channel or storm drain where such work has been approved by the county; or (E) Excavation and grading where the excavated material will be used on the same property or on property contiguous to and under the same ownership as the excavation. (ik) *“Mitigation” means measures prescribed and implemented to avoid, minimize, lessen, or compensate for adverse impacts. Explicit in this definition is the following order of preference: (i) Avoiding an impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of actions; (ii) Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of an action and its implementation; (iii) Rectifying impacts by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment; (iv) Reducing or eliminating an impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action; (v) Compensating for an impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments; and (vi) Monitoring the mitigation and taking remedial action when necessary. (jl) “Mitigation bank” means a site where wetlands or similar habitats are restored, created, enhanced, or in exceptional circumstances, preserved, expressly for the purpose of providing compensatory mitigation in advance of authorized impacts to aquatic resources. (km) “Mitigation plan” means a detailed plan indicating actions necessary to mitigate adverse impacts to shorelines and/or critical areas. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 34/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (ln) “Mixed use” means a combination of uses within the same building or site as a part of an integrated development project with functional interrelationships and coherent physical design. (mo) *“Mobile home” means a factory-built dwelling built prior to June 15, 1976, to the standards other than the HUD Code, and acceptable under applicable state codes in effect at the time of construction or introduction of the home into the state. Mobile homes have not been built since the introduction of the HUD Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards Act. See also “Manufactured home” in Chapter 18.10 JCC. (np) *“Mobile home park” means a development with two or more improved pads or spaces with required improvements and utilities designed to accommodate mobile homes, according to RCW 59.20.030(4). (oq) “Monitoring” means evaluating the effects of a development action on the biological, hydrological, pedological, and geological elements of natural systems and/or assessing the performance of required mitigation measures through data collection, analysis and reporting. (pr) ****“Mooring buoy” means an anchored floating device in a water body used for the landing or storage of a vessel or water craft. (qs) *“Motel” means a commercial building or group of buildings in which lodging is provided to transient guests, offered to the public for compensation, and in which access to and from each room or unit is through an exterior door. (rt) *“Motor home” means a motor vehicle originally designed, reconstructed, or permanently altered to provide facilities for human habitation, which include lodging, cooking, and sewage disposal, and enclosed within a solid body shell with the vehicle, but excluding a camper or similar unit constructed separately and affixed to a motor vehicle (RCW 46.04.305). (su) ***“Must” means a mandate; the action is required. (tv) “Multifamily dwelling” means a single building, or portion thereof, designed for or occupied by three or more families living independently of each other in separate dwelling units on one lot of record and, for the purpose of this program, includes triplexes, fourplexes, apartment buildings, and residential condominiums. (14) N Definitions. (a) *“National Register of Historic Places” means the official federal list, established by the National Historic Preservation Act, of sites, districts, buildings, structures and objects significant in the nation’s history and prehistory, or whose artistic or architectural value is unique. (b) *“Native vegetation” means plant species that are indigenous to Jefferson County. (c) “Nearshore” means the estuarine delta/marine shoreline and areas of shallow water from the top of the coastal bank or bluffs to the water at a depth of about 10 meters relative to mean lower low water. (d) “Net pens” are finfish culturing systems that generally consist of two nets – an interior net to keep fish in and an exterior net to exclude predators. Net pens are typically anchored to the Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 35/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. waterbody floor and suspended from the surface with a floatation structure; the netting continues above the water to a degree to stop fish from jumping out. Fish pen structures solely and directly established and managed for purposes of salmon enhancement and/or restoration are not considered net pens for purposes of this program. (e) “No net loss (NNL)” means the maintenance of the aggregate total of the county shoreline ecological functions over time. The no net loss standard contained in WAC 173-26-186 requires that the impacts of shoreline use and/or development, whether permitted or exempt from permit requirements, be identified and mitigated such that there are no resulting adverse impacts on ecological functions or processes. (f) *“Noise” means any sound not occurring in the natural environment which causes or tends to cause an adverse psychological or physiological effect on humans. This includes sounds arising from the amplification of noises generated by expected or permitted uses of a lot or structure. (g) “Nonconforming” means a use or development which conformed to the applicable codes in effect on the date of its creation but which no longer complies because of changes in code requirements. Nonconformity is different than and not to be confused with illegality (see “Illegal use”). (h) “Nonconforming lot” means a legal lot of record in existence prior to the effective date of this program and any amendments thereto, on which it is not possible to construct a structure outside of/landward of the shoreline buffer or which does not otherwise meet the minimum lot sizedepth requirements as set forth in this program. Depth of lot is measured as the distance from ordinary high water mark to the inside edge of the frontage setback. (i) *“Nonconforming structure” means a structure which does not conform to the dimensional regulations of this program, including but not limited to setback, buffer, height, lot coverage, density, and building configuration. (j) *“Nonconsumptive use” means a use which does not permanently deplete, degrade, or destroy the resource involved. (15) O Definitions. (a(a) “Ocean disposal uses” means the deliberate deposition or release of material at sea, such as solid wastes, industrial waste, radioactive waste, incineration, incinerator residue, dredged materials, vessels, aircraft, ordinance, platforms, or other man-made structures. (b) “Ocean energy production uses” means the production of energy in a usable form directly in or on the ocean rather than extracting a raw material that is transported elsewhere to produce energy in a readily usable form. Examples of these ocean uses are facilities that use wind, wave action or differences in water temperature to generate electricity. (c) “Ocean mining” means such uses as the mining of metal, mineral, sand, and gravel resources from the sea floor. (d) “Ocean research activities” means scientific investigation for the purpose of furthering knowledge and understanding. Investigation activities involving necessary and functionally related Commented [LG16]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations and Code Interpretation #3 Commented [LG17]: Respond to October 2020 Ecology Checklist addressing 2018 Marine Spatial Plan Commented [LG18]: Respond to October 2020 Ecology Checklist addressing 2018 Marine Spatial Plan Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 36/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. precursor activities to an ocean use or development may be considered exploration or part of the use or development. (e) “Ocean salvage uses” share characteristics of other ocean uses and involve relatively small sites occurring intermittently. Historic shipwreck salvage which combines aspects of recreation, exploration, research, and mining is an example of such a use. (f) “Ocean transportation” means such uses as: Shipping, transferring between vessels, and offshore storage of oil and gas; transport of other goods and commodities; and offshore ports and airports. (g) “Ocean use, new” means uses and developments that have not occurred or were not permitted within Washington’s Coastal waters prior to the completion of the Marine Spatial Plan for Washington’s Pacific Coast, as adopted June 2018. New uses, as defined by the MSP, are in-water uses, with potential adverse impacts to renewable resources or existing uses that have not been previously reviewed or authorized/permitted within the MSP study area. The MSP anticipates new ocean use proposals for activities such as renewable energy, dredged material disposal, mining, marine product harvesting, and offshore aquaculture operations. (h) “Ocean uses” mean activities or developments involving renewable and/or nonrenewable resources that occur on Washington's coastal waters and includes their associated off shore, near shore, inland marine, shoreland, and upland facilities and the supply, service, and distribution activities, such as crew ships, circulating to and between the activities and developments. Ocean uses involving nonrenewable resources include such activities as extraction of oil, gas and minerals, energy production, disposal of waste products, and salvage. Ocean uses which generally involve sustainable use of renewable resources include commercial, recreational, and tribal fishing, aquaculture, recreation, shellfish harvesting, and pleasure craft activity. (i) “Off-premises sign” means a sign situated on premises other than those premises to which the sign’s message is related. (bj) ****“Offshore” means the sloping subtidal area seaward from the low intertidal. (ck) “Off-site mitigation” means to replace shoreline resources at a location away from the site that is impacted by development. (dl) “On-premises sign” means a sign situated on the premises to which the sign’s message is related. (ek) *“On-site waste disposal” means any one of several means for disposal of sanitary waste on the property from which it is generated (e.g., septic tank and drainfield). (fl) *“Open record hearing” means a hearing, conducted by a single hearing body or officer that creates the record through testimony and submission of evidence and information, under procedures prescribed by ordinance or resolution. An open record hearing may be held prior to the decision on a project permit and is to be known as an open record predecision hearing. An open record hearing may be held on an appeal, and is to be known as an open record appeal hearing, if no open record predecision hearing has been held on the project permit. Commented [LG19]: Respond to October 2020 Ecology Checklist addressing 2018 Marine Spatial Plan Commented [LG20]: Respond to October 2020 Ecology Checklist addressing 2018 Marine Spatial Plan Commented [LG21]: Respond to October 2020 Ecology Checklist addressing 2018 Marine Spatial Plan Commented [LG22]: Respond to October 2020 Ecology Checklist addressing 2018 Marine Spatial Plan Commented [LG23]: Respond to October 2020 Ecology Checklist addressing 2018 Marine Spatial Plan Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 37/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (gm) *“Open space” means lands committed to farming and forestry uses and any parcel, lot, or area of land or water essentially unimproved and set aside, dedicated, designated, or reserved for public or private use or enjoyment. (hn) *“Open space tax program” means a county program associated with property taxation. Land being used for agriculture may be enrolled in the tax program through the county assessor. The tax program is independent of land use designation (i.e., zoning) and these development regulations, except in the context of identifying existing and ongoing agriculture, as defined and regulated in this program. (io) *“Operator” means any person who is in actual physical or electronic control of a powered watercraft, motor vehicle, aircraft, off-highway vehicle, or any other engine driven vehicle. (jp) ***“Ordinary high water mark” or “OHWM” means that mark that will be found by examining the bed and banks and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual, and so long continued in all ordinary years, as to mark upon the soil a character distinct from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation as that condition exists on June 1, 1971, as it may naturally change thereafter, or as it may change hereafter in accordance with permits issued by Jefferson County or the Department of Ecology. On a site-specific basis, Department of Ecology has the final authority on determining where the ordinary high water mark is located (RCW 90.58.030). (kq) ****“Outer harbor line” means a line located and established in navigable waters as provided in Section 1 of Article 15 of the Washington State Constitution, beyond which the state shall never sell or lease any rights whatsoever to private persons. (lr) *“Owner” means an individual, firm, business entity, trust, association, syndicate, partnership, or corporation having sufficient property interest to seek development of land. (ms) *“Owner-occupied” means the residential occupancy of a building or property by the owner. (16) P Definitions. (a) *“Park” means a tract of land designated for and used by the public for recreation. (b) *“Parking lot” means an off-street, ground level open area, usually improved, for the temporary storage of motor vehicles. (c) *“Parties of record” means the land use permit applicant; persons who have testified at the open record hearing; and any persons who have submitted written comments concerning the application that form part of the public record (excluding persons who only signed petitions or mechanically produced form letters). (d) *“Performance standard” means a set of criteria or limits relating to certain characteristics that a particular use or process may not exceed. (e) *“Permit center” means the Jefferson County department of community development. (f) *“Permit review” means the process of reviewing applications for project permits for consistency with the requirements of this program. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 38/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (g) *“Permittee” means the entity to whom a permit is granted. (h) *“Person” means any individual, owner, contractor, tenant, partnership, corporation, business entity, association, organization, cooperative, public or municipal corporation, agency of a state or local governmental unit however designated, public or private institution, or an employee or agent of any of the foregoing entities. (i) *“Pervious surface” means a surface that absorbs water. (j) “Pier” means a fixed platform structure supported by piles in a water body that abuts the shore to provide landing for water-dependent recreation or moorage for vessels or watercraft and does not include above water storage. (k) *“Planned rural residential development (PRRD)” means development characterized by a unified site design, clustered residential units, and areas of common open space pursuant to Article VI-M of Chapter 18.15 JCC. (l) *“Planning department” means the Jefferson County department of community development. (m) *“Plat” means a map or representation of a subdivision or short subdivision of land showing the division of a parcel of land into lots, roads, dedications, common areas, restrictions and easements, as regulated by Chapter 58.17 RCW and this program. (n) *“Playing field” means a land area designed and used for outdoor games, such as baseball, football, soccer, track events and tennis. It includes public outdoor swimming pools. (o) “Port” means a legal entity established for purposes of acquiring, constructing, maintaining, operating, developing and regulating harbor improvements, rail or motor vehicle transfer and terminal facilities, water transfer and terminal facilities, air transfer and terminal facilities, or any combination of such transfer and terminal facilities, and other commercial transportation, transfer, handling, storage and terminal facilities, and industrial improvements. (p) *“Predecision hearing, open record” means a hearing, conducted by the hearing examiner, that creates the county’s record through testimony and submittal of evidence and information, under procedures prescribed by the county by ordinance or resolution. An open record predecision hearing may be held prior to the county’s decision on a project permit (RCW 36.70B.020). (q) *“Preliminary plat” means a neat and approximate drawing of a proposed subdivision showing the general layout of streets, lots, blocks (if applicable) and other elements of a subdivision consistent with the provisions of this program. (r) “Preservation” means actions taken to ensure the permanent protection of existing, ecologically important areas that the county has deemed worthy of long-term protection. (s) “Primary association” means the use of a habitat area by a listed or priority species for breeding/spawning, rearing young, resting, roosting, feeding, foraging, and/or migrating on a frequent and/or regular basis during the appropriate season(s) as well as habitats that are used less frequently/regularly but which provide for essential life cycle functions such as breeding/nesting/spawning. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 39/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (t) *“Primary use” means the principal use of a property. (u) “Priority habitat” means a habitat type with unique or significant value to one or more species. An area classified and mapped as priority habitat must have one or more of the following attributes: comparatively high fish or wildlife density; comparatively high fish or wildlife species diversity; fish spawning habitat; important fish and wildlife breeding habitat; important fish or wildlife seasonal range; important fish or wildlife movement corridor; rearing and foraging habitat; refuge; limited availability; high vulnerability to habitat alteration; unique or dependent species; or shellfish bed. A priority habitat may be described by a unique vegetation type or by a dominant plant species that is of primary importance to fish and wildlife (such as oak woodlands or eelgrass meadows). A priority habitat may also be described by a successional stage (such as old growth and mature forests). Alternatively, a priority habitat may consist of a specific habitat element (such as talus slopes, caves, snags) of key value to fish and wildlife. A priority habitat may contain priority and/or nonpriority fish and wildlife (WAC 173-26-020(24)). (v) “Priority species” means wildlife species of concern due to their population status and their sensitivity to habitat alteration, as defined by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. (w) *“Prohibited use” means any use or activity which is specifically not allowed by this program. A prohibited use cannot be authorized through a variance or conditional use permit. (x) “Project” means any proposed or existing activity regulated by Jefferson County. (y) ****“Project area” means all areas at and around a proposed shoreline development that would be affected directly or indirectly by the proposal for which a project proponent is seeking approval under this master program, and not simply the immediate area involved in the project. That is, the project area may consist of an area larger than the affected lot or parcel. Direct effects are those caused by the proposed project and occur at the same time and place. Indirect effects are those caused by the proposed project and are later in time, but still are reasonably certain to occur. The shoreline administrator is vested with the authority to define the project area. (z) *“Proof of ownership” means a photocopy of a recorded deed to property and/or a current title insurance policy insuring the status of an applicant as the owner in fee title to real property. (aa) “Proponent” means the owner, sponsor, authorized agent and/or permit applicant of any proposed use or development on or affecting shorelines of the state. (bb) *“Provision” means any written language contained in this program, including without limitation any definition, policy, goal, regulation, requirement, standard, authorization, or prohibition. (cc) “Pruning” means the removal of any of a tree’s living branches. (dd) “Public access” is a goal of the Shoreline Management Act that supports the public’s right to get to, view and use the state’s public waters, both saltwater and freshwater, the water/land interface and associated shoreline area. It includes physical access that is either lateral (areas paralleling the shore) or perpendicular (an easement or public corridor to the shore), and/or visual access facilitated by scenic roads and overlooks, viewing towers and other public sites or facilities. Public access can be established by easement or other means and may not always include a facility Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 40/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. or structure. Public access is intended to connect people to public lands and waters, not to allow trespassing on private property. (ee) *“Public facilities (and services)” means facilities which serve the general public including streets, roads, ferries, sidewalks, street and road lighting systems, traffic signals, community water systems, community sewage treatment systems, storm sewer systems, parks and recreational facilities, and libraries (see RCW 36.70A.030). Some public facilities are essential public facilities. (ff) “Public interest” means the interest shared by the citizens of the state or community at large in the affairs of government, or some interest by which their rights or liabilities are affected including, but not limited to, an effect on public property or on health, safety, or general welfare resulting from adverse effects of a use or development. (gg) *“Public transportation systems” means public facilities for air, water, or land transportation. (hh) “Public use” means the use of any land, water, or building by a public agency for the general public, or by the public itself. (ii) “Public utility” means a use owned or operated by a public or publicly licensed or franchised agency that provides essential public services such as telephone exchanges, electric substations, radio and television stations, wireless communications services, gas and water regulation stations and other facilities of this nature. (17) Q Definitions. (a) “Qualified professional” or “qualified consultant” means a person with experience and training with expertise appropriate for the relevant subject. A qualified professional/consultant must have obtained a B.S. or B.A. degree or have appropriate education and experience. (b) “Qualified geotechnical engineer” means a professional engineering geologist or geotechnical engineer, licensed in the state of Washington. (18) R Definitions. (a) *“Rare, endangered, threatened and sensitive species” means plant and animal species identified and listed by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Washington Natural Heritage Program, Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife, or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, as being severely limited or threatened with extinction within their native ranges. (b) *“RCW” means the Revised Code of Washington. (c) “Reach” means a section of shoreline and associated planning area that is mapped and described as a unit due to relatively homogenous characteristics that include land use and/or natural features, such as a drift cell location and other factors. (d) “Reasonably foreseeable,” in the context of this program and the Comprehensive Plan, means predictable by an average person based on existing conditions, anticipated build-out, and approved/pending permits. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 41/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (e) “Recharge” means the process involved in the absorption and addition of water from the unsaturated zone to ground water. (f) “Reclamation” means, in accordance with RCW 78.44.031, rehabilitation for the appropriate future use of disturbed areas resulting from surface mining. (g) *“Recording” means the filing of a document(s) for recordation with the county auditor. (h) *“Recreational development” means parks and facilities for camping, indoor and outdoor sports, and similar developments. (i) “Recreation, shoreline” means a commercial or public activity intended for personal enjoyment and leisure. Most shoreline recreation occurs outdoors and can be either passive (such as observation or recording activities such as photography, painting, bird watching, viewing of water conditions or shoreline features, nature study and related activities) or active (such as: fishing, clamming, hunting, beach combing, rock climbing; boating, swimming, hiking, bicycling, horseback riding, camping, picnicking, and similar activities). Existing rules for health, safety and public conduct are not exempted by an action being deemed recreational. (j) “Reestablishment” means measures taken to intentionally restore an altered or damaged natural feature or process including: (i) Active steps taken to restore damaged wetlands, streams, protected habitat, and/or their buffers to the functioning condition that existed prior to an unauthorized alteration; (ii) Actions performed to reestablish structural and functional characteristics of the critical area that have been lost by alteration, past management activities, or other events; and (iii) Restoration can include restoration of wetland functions and values on a site where wetlands previously existed, but are no longer present due to lack of water or hydric soils. (k) ****“Rehabilitation” means a type of restoration action intended to repair natural or historic functions and processes. Activities could involve breaching a dike to reconnect wetlands to a floodplain or other activities that restore the natural water regime. (l) “Renovation” means to restore to an earlier condition as by repairing or remodeling. “Renovation” shall include any interior changes to the building and those exterior changes that do not substantially change the character of the existing structure. (m) “Resident fish” means a fish species that completes all stages of its life cycle within freshwater and frequently within a local area. (n) “Residential development” means development of land with dwelling units for nontransient occupancy including single-family, multifamily, and creation of new residential lots by land division. For the purposes of this program, accessory dwelling units, garages, and other similar structures accessory to a dwelling unit shall also be considered residential development (see also “Dwelling unit” and “Accessory dwelling unit”). (o) *“Resource-based industrial” means a forest resource-based industrial land use designation that recognizes existing, active sawmills and related activities. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 42/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (p) *“Resource lands” means agricultural, forest, and mineral lands that have long-term commercial significance. (q) *“Restoration” means the reestablishment or upgrading of impaired ecological shoreline processes or functions. This may be accomplished through measures including, but not limited to, revegetation, removal of fill, removal of intrusive shoreline structures and removal or treatment of toxic materials. Restoration does not imply a requirement for returning the shoreline area to aboriginal or pre-European settlement conditions. (r) *“Restriction” means a limitation placed upon the use of parcel(s) of land. (s) “Revetment” means a sloped wall constructed of rip-rap or other suitable material placed on stream banks or other shorelines to retard bank erosion and minimize lateral stream movement. (t) “Rip-rap” means dense, hard, angular rock free from cracks or other defects conducive to weathering often used for bulkheads, revetments or similar slope/bank stabilization purposes. (u) “Riparian corridor, zone or area” means the area adjacent to a water body (stream, lake or marine water) that contains vegetation that influences the aquatic ecosystem, nearshore area and/or fish and wildlife habitat by providing shade, fine or large woody material, nutrients, organic debris, sediment filtration, and terrestrial insects (prey production). Riparian areas include those portions of terrestrial ecosystems that significantly influence exchanges of energy and matter with aquatic ecosystems (i.e., zone of influence). Riparian zones provide important wildlife habitat. They provide sites for foraging, breeding and nesting; cover to escape predators or weather; and corridors that connect different parts of a watershed for dispersal and migration. (v) ****“River” means a large natural stream of water emptying into any ocean, lake, or other body of water, and usually fed along its course by converging tributaries. (w) *“Road” means an improved and maintained public or private right-of-way which provides vehicular access to abutting properties, and which may also include provision for public utilities, pedestrian access, cut and fill slopes, and drainage. (x) *“Runoff” means water originating from rainfall and other precipitation that is found in drainage facilities, rivers, streams, springs, seeps, ponds, lakes and wetlands as well as shallow ground water. In addition, that portion of rainfall or other precipitation that becomes surface flow and interflow. (y) *“Rural lands” means the class of land use designations which are intended to preserve the rural character of the county. Rural land designations include the following: rural residential, rural commercial, and rural industrial. (z) *“Rural residential designation” means the land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan designed to recognize existing residential development patterns of the rural landscape and provide for a variety of residential living opportunities at densities which maintain the primarily rural residential character of an area. (19) S Definitions. (a) *“Sale” means the conveyance for consideration of legal or beneficial ownership. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 43/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (b) *“Saltwater intrusion” or “seawater intrusion” means the underground flow of salt water into wells and aquifers. (c) ****“Scientific and educational facilities” means those sites, structures, or facilities that provide unique insight into our natural and cultural heritage. Water-oriented facilities including but not limited to maritime education and training are part of scientific and educational facilities. (d) *“Screening” means a method of visually shielding or obscuring a structure or use from view by fencing, walls, trees, or densely planted vegetation. (e) *“Seaward” means to or toward the sea. (f) ****“Seawall” means a structure whose primary purpose is to protect the shore from erosion by water waves. Seawalls are similar but typically more massive than bulkheads because they are designed to resist the full force of waves. (g) “Sedimentation” means the process by which material is transported and deposited by water or wind. (h) “Setback” means the distance a building structure is placed behind a specified limit such as a lot line or shoreline buffer. (i) “Shared use” means a facility shared by two or more lots/parcels. This can apply to facilities for adjoining lots or facilities shared between waterfront and upland properties; comparable to “Community structure” per JCC 18.10.030. See also “Community dock.” (j) “Shellfish” means invertebrate organisms of the phyla Arthropoda (class Crustacea), Mollusca (class Pelecypoda) and Echinodermata. Shellfish possess a full, partial or vestigial hard outer shell, carapace or exoskeleton. Examples include, but are not limited to, crabs and shrimp, clams, oysters, mussels and other bivalves, snails, limpets, abalone and other single-shelled gastropods, and sea urchins, sea cucumbers, sea stars. (k) “Shellfish habitat conservation areas” are all public and private tidelands suitable for shellfish, as identified by the Washington Department of Health classification of commercial growing areas, and those recreational harvest areas as identified by the Washington Department of Ecology as designated as shellfish habitat conservation areas pursuant to WAC 365-190-80. Any area that is or has been designated as a shellfish protection district created under Chapter 90.72 RCW is also a shellfish habitat conservation area. (l) “Shore armoring” or “structural shoreline armoring” refers to the placement of bulkheads and other hard structures on the shoreline to provide stabilization and reduce or prevent erosion caused by wave action, currents and/or the natural transport of sediments along the shoreline. Groins, jetties, breakwaters, revetments, sea walls are examples of other types of shoreline armoring. (m) ***“Shorelands” or “shoreland areas” means those lands extending landward for 200 feet in all directions as measured on a horizontal plane from and perpendicular to the ordinary high water mark; floodways and contiguous floodplain areas landward 200 feet from such floodways; and all wetlands and river deltas associated with the streams, lakes and tidal waters which are subject to Commented [LG24]: Task Force D Marine trades and economic development. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 44/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. the provisions of Chapter 173-22 WAC, as may be amended; the same to be designated as to location by the Department of Ecology, as defined by Chapter 90.58 RCW. (n) ***“Shorelines” are all of the water areas of the state as defined in RCW 90.58.030, including reservoirs and their associated shorelands, together with the lands underlying them except the following, which are excluded: (i) Shorelines of statewide significance; (ii) Shorelines on segments of streams upstream of a point where the mean annual flow is 20 cubic feet per second (20 cfs) or less and the wetlands associated with such upstream segments; and (iii) Shorelines on lakes less than 20 acres in size and wetlands associated with such small lakes. (o) “Shoreline conditional use” means a use, development, substantial development, or unclassified use that, owing to some special characteristics attendant to its typical operation or installation, may be allowed in certain circumstances when consistent with criteria specified herein. (p) “Shoreline conditional use permit” means a permit issued by Jefferson County and approved by Ecology stating that the land uses and activities meet all criteria set forth in this program, and all conditions of approval in accordance with the procedural requirements of this program. (q) “Shoreline jurisdiction” means all shorelines of the state and shorelands. (r) *“Shoreline Management Act (SMA)” means the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 (Chapter 90.58 RCW), as amended. (s) “Shoreline master program” (“SMP” or “program”) means the Jefferson County shoreline master program. (t) **“Shoreline modification activities” means those actions that modify the physical configuration or qualities of the shoreline area, usually through the construction of a physical element such as a bulkhead, dock or other shoreline structure. They can include other actions, such as clearing, grading, or filling. (u) “Shoreline permit” means a shoreline substantial development permit (SSDP), a shoreline conditional use permit, or a shoreline variance, or any combination thereof issued by Jefferson County pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW. (v) “Shoreline stabilization” means nonstructural modifications to the existing shoreline intended to reduce or prevent erosion of uplands or beaches and/or influence wave action, currents and/or the natural transport of sediments along the shoreline. This includes use of bioengineering and other forms of vegetative stabilization. (w) ****“Shorelines of statewide significance (SSWS)” with respect to Jefferson County are identified as follows: Commented [LG25]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations definition of SSWS Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 45/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (i) The area between the ordinary high water mark and the western boundary of the state, within Jefferson County and state of Washington jurisdiction, including harbors, bays, estuaries, and inlets. (ii) The area between the ordinary high water mark and the western boundary of the state, within Jefferson County and state of Washington jurisdiction, including harbors, bays, estuaries, and inlets. (iii(ii) The lakes, whether natural, artificial, or a combination thereof, with a surface acreage of 1,000 acres or more measured at the ordinary high water mark, including associated wetlands. (iviii) Those areas of Puget Sound and the Strait of Juan de Fuca between the ordinary high water mark and the line of extreme low tide, which are Hood Canal from Tala Point to Foulweather Bluff, south to the Mason-Jefferson County line, including associated wetlands. (viv) Those areas of Puget Sound and the Strait of Juan de Fuca and adjacent salt waters north to the Canadian line and lying seaward from the line of extreme low tide. (viv) Those natural rivers or segments thereof downstream from a point where the mean annual flow is measured at 1,000 cubic feet per second or more. In Jefferson County these rivers include portions of the Bogachiel River, Clearwater River, Hoh River, and Quinault River. (viivi) Those shorelands associated with the areas described in subsection (19)(w)() (i), (, ii),, iii and (iv)v) of this definition. (x) ***“Shorelines of the state” means the total of all shorelines and shorelines of statewide significance within Washington State. (y) *“Short plat” means a neat and accurate drawing of a short subdivision, prepared for filing for record with the county auditor, and containing all elements and requirements set forth in Chapter 18.35 JCC. (z) *“Should” means that the particular action is preferred unless there is a demonstrated, compelling reason, based on policy of the Act and this program, against taking the action (WAC 173- 26-020(32)). (aa) *“Sign” means any object, device, display or structure, or part thereof, situated outdoors or indoors, which is used to advertise, identify, display, direct or attract attention to an object, person, institution, organization, business, product, service, event or location by any means, including words, letters, figures, design, symbols, fixtures, colors, illumination or projected images. Excluded from this definition are signs required by law, such as handicapped parking signs, and the flags of national and state governments. (bb) *“Sign, commercial or industrial” means a sign that directs attention to a business or profession, to a commodity or service sold, offered, or manufactured, or to an entertainment offered on the premises where the sign is located. (cc) “Significant vegetation removal” means the removal or alteration of trees, shrubs, and/or ground cover by clearing, grading, cutting, burning, chemical means, or other activity that causes significant impacts to ecological functions provided by such vegetation. The removal of invasive or noxious weeds does not constitute significant vegetation removal. Tree pruning, not including tree Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 46/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. topping, where it does not affect ecological functions, does not constitute significant vegetation removal. (dd) *“Single-family residence” means a dwelling unit designed for and occupied by no more than one family. (ee) “Site plan approval advance determination (SPAAD)” means a review of a proposed development on a particular parcel for site requirements and constraints to allow prospective land buyers, owners or developers a means to obtain a five-year authorization prior to obtaining building permits for the development action. The intent is to reduce costs and aid financing and serves to vest a proposed development to current regulations. (ff) “Slope” means: (i) Gradient. (ii) The inclined surface of any part of the earth’s surface, delineated by establishing its toe and top and measured by averaging the inclination over at least 10 feet of vertical relief. (gg) *“Small-scale” means of a size or intensity which has minimal impacts on the surrounding area and which makes minimal demands on the existing infrastructure. (hh) “Soil” means all unconsolidated materials above bedrock described in the Soil Conservation Service Classification System or by the Unified Soils Classification System. (ii) *“Solid waste” means all putrescible and nonputrescible solid and semi-solid wastes, except wastes identified in WAC 173-304-015, including, but not limited to, junk vehicles, garbage, rubbish, ashes, industrial wastes, swill, demolition and construction wastes, abandoned vehicles or parts thereof, and discarded commodities, but excluding agricultural wastes and crop residues returned to the soil at agronomic rates. This includes all liquid, solid and semi-solid materials which are not the primary products of public, private, industrial, commercial, mining and agricultural operations. Solid waste includes but is not limited to sludge from wastewater treatment plants and septage from septic tanks, wood waste, dangerous waste, and problem wastes. Unrecovered residues from recycling operations shall be considered solid waste. (jj) ****“Solid waste handling and disposal facilities” means any land or structure where solid waste is stored, collected, transported, or processed in any form, whether loose, baled or containerized, including but not limited to the following: transfer stations, landfills, or solid waste loading facilities. Solid waste handling and disposal facilities do not include the following: handling or disposal of solid waste as an incidental part of an otherwise permitted use; and solid waste recycling and reclamation activities not conducted on the same site as and accessory to the handling and disposal of garbage and refuse. (kk) *“Solid waste disposal” means the act or process of disposing of rubbish and garbage. (ll) SPAAD. See “Site plan approval advance determination.” (mm) “Spit” means an accretion shoreform that is narrow in relation to length and extends parallel to or curves outward from shore; spits are also characterized by a substantial wave-built sand and Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 47/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. gravel berm on the windward side, and a more gently sloping silt or marsh shore on the lagoon or leeward side; curved spits are called hooks. (nn) *“Storage yard, outdoor” means an outdoor area used for the storage of equipment, vehicles or materials for periods exceeding 72 hours. (oo) ****“Stormwater” means rain or snow melt that does not naturally infiltrate into the ground but runs off surfaces such as rooftops, streets, or lawns, directly or indirectly, into streams and other water bodies or through constructed infiltration facilities into the ground. (pp) “Stream” means an area where surface waters produce a defined channel or bed. A defined channel or bed is an area that demonstrates clear evidence of the annual passage of water and includes, but is not limited to, bedrock channels, gravel beds, sand and silt beds, and defined channel swales. The channel or bed need not contain water year round. This definition includes drainage ditches or other artificial water courses where natural streams existed prior to human alteration, and/or the waterway is used by anadromous or resident salmonid or other fish populations. (qq) “Strict construction” means an interpretation that considers only the literal words of a writing, as compared to liberal construction. (rr) *“Structure” means a permanent or temporary edifice or building or any piece of work artificially built up or composed of parts joined together in some definite manner, whether installed on, above, or below the surface of the ground or water, except for vessels (WAC 173-27-030). Retaining walls, bulkheads, fences, landscaping walls/decorative rockeries, and similar improvements to real property are examples of structures. Geoduck tubes are not considered structures for purposes of this program. (ss) *“Subdivision” means the division or redivision of land into lots, tracts, parcels, sites or divisions for the purpose of sale, lease or transfer of ownership. (tt) “Substantial development” means any development of which the total cost or fair market value exceeds $5,7187,047 or as adjusted by the state legislature, or any development which materially interferes with the normal public use of the water or shorelines of the state; except the classes of development listed (a) through (l) under RCW 90.58.030(3)(e). (uu) ****“Substantially degrade” means to cause damage or harm to an area’s ecological functions. An action is considered to substantially degrade the environment under any of the following criteria: (i) The damaged ecological function or functions affect other related functions or the viability of the larger ecosystem; or (ii) The degrading action may cause damage or harm to shoreline ecological functions under foreseeable conditions; or (iii) Scientific evidence indicates that the action may contribute to damage or harm to ecological functions as part of cumulative impacts from similar permitted development on nearby shorelines. Commented [LG26]: 2017 a Periodic Checklist: Ecology suggests changing value or changing to citation; approach up to County but Ecology would require a change as the County had explicity stated the older value. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 48/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (vv) ****“Subtidal” means the area waterward of the line of extreme low tide. (ww) *“Sustainable” means actions or activities which preserve and enhance resources for future generations. (20) T Definitions. (a) *“Threatened species” means a species that is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future, as classified by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Department of Natural Resources, Washington Natural Heritage Program, or the federal Endangered Species Act. (b) *“Threshold determination” means the decision by the responsible official under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) regarding the likelihood that a project or other action (WAC 197- 11-704) will have a probable significant adverse impact on an element of the environment. (c) “Toe” means the lowest part of a slope or cliff; the downslope end of an alluvial fan, landslide, etc. (d) ***“Tombolo” means a causeway-like accretion spit connecting an offshore rock or island with the main shore, such as the formation that connects Hood Head to the southern shore of Paradise Bay, near the Hood Canal Bridge. (e) “Topping” means the removal of any part of a tree’s main stem. (f) “Trimming” means the removal of living plant matter from any type of vegetation and includes limbing, thinning, shaping, tree pruning and topping. (21) U Definitions. (a) “Unavoidable” means adverse impacts that remain after all appropriate avoidance and minimization measures have been implemented. (b) *“Uplands” means dry lands landward of OHWM. (c) *“Urban growth area (UGA)” means an area designated by the county within which urban growth is to be encouraged and outside of which growth is not intended to be urban in nature (cf., Chapter 36.70A RCW). (d) *“Use” means the purpose that land or building or structures now serve or for which they are or may be occupied, maintained, arranged, designed, or intended. (e) *“Utility distribution lines” means pipes, wires, and associated structural supports. (f) *“Utility facilities” means facilities directly used for the distribution or transmission of services to an area, excluding utility service offices. (f) * “Utilities” means services and facilities that produce, convey, store, or process power, gas, sewage, communications, oil, waste, and the like. On-site utility features serving a primary use, such as a water, sewer or gas line to a residence, are "accessory utilities" and shall be considered a part of the primary use. Commented [LG27]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations "Utilities" WAC 173-26-241 (3) (l) Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 49/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (22) V Definitions. (a) *“Variance (or shoreline variance) permit” means a type of permit that can provide relief from the dimensional requirements of this program. A variance may only be granted when all of the criteria listed at WAC 173-27-170 are met. The variance is intended to allow only a minimum degree of variation from setback or other standards, just enough to afford relief and to allow a reasonable use of a property. Variances approved by Jefferson County must also be approved, denied, or approved with conditions by Ecology. (b) “Vegetation” means all live plant material, including native and nonnative, woody and herbaceous, deciduous and evergreen, trees and understory groundcover, aquatic and terrestrial. (c) “Vegetative debris” means all dead and downed plant material, naturally expired or portions of a plant removed intentionally, such as by trimming, resulting from native and nonnative, woody and herbaceous, deciduous and evergreen, trees and understory groundcover, aquatic and terrestrial source. Examples include, but are not limited to, leaves, needles, branches, limbs, annual herbaceous growth, and grass clippings. A standing tree snag is not considered vegetative debris for the purposes of this program. (d) “Vegetation removal” means physical extraction, including the whole plant plus its root structure, or trimming in excess of that which a plant can survive even though the root structure is left in place, or chemical expiration of plant material. (e) “Vessel” means a floating structure that is designed primarily for navigation, is normally capable of self propulsion and use as a means of transportation, and meets all applicable laws and regulations pertaining to navigation and safety equipment on vessels, including, but not limited to, registration as a vessel by an appropriate government agency as per WAC 332-30-103. (f) *“Vicinity” means, in rural and resource lands, the area within one mile of the exterior boundary of a given parcel (JCC 18.10.220). (g) ****“View protection” means protection of the visual quality of the shoreline resource and maintenance of view corridors to and from waterways and their adjacent shoreland features. (23) W Definitions. (a) *“WAC” means the Washington Administrative Code. (b(b) “Walkway,” for purposes of JCC 18.25.350, means the typically perpendicular element of a pier extending waterward from the shoreline. (c) ****“Waste disposal” means refuse composed of garbage, rubbish, ashes, dead animals, demolition wastes, automobile parts, and similar material. (cd) **“Water-dependent use” means a use or portion of a use that requires direct contact with the water and cannot exist at a nonwater location due to the intrinsic nature of its operations. Ferry terminals, public fishing piers, marinas, and shellfish aquaculture are examples of water-dependent uses. Residential development is not a water-dependent use but is a preferred use of shorelines of the state. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 50/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (de) **“Water-enjoyment use” means a recreational use or other use that facilitates public access to the shoreline as a primary characteristic of the use; or a use that provides for recreational use or aesthetic enjoyment of the shoreline for a substantial number of people as a general characteristic of the use and which through location, design, and operation ensures the public’s ability to enjoy the physical and aesthetic qualities of the shoreline. In order to qualify as a water-enjoyment use, the use must be open to the general public and the shoreline-oriented space within the project must be devoted to the specific aspects of the use that fosters shoreline enjoyment. A restaurant or similar use may qualify as a water-enjoyment use, provided it includes public access to the shoreline. (ef) “Water-oriented use” means any one or a combination of water-dependent, water-related or water-enjoyment uses and serves as an all-encompassing definition for priority uses under the Act. (fg) “Water quality” means the characteristics of water, including flow or amount and related physical, chemical, aesthetic, recreation-related, and biological characteristics. (gh) **“Water-related use” means a use or portion of a use that is not intrinsically dependent on a waterfront location but depends upon a waterfront location for economic viability because of one of the following: (i) A functional requirement for a waterfront location such as the arrival or shipment of materials by water or the need for large quantities of water; or (ii) The use provides a necessary service supportive of the water-dependent activities and the proximity of the use to its customers makes its services less expensive and/or more convenient. Water-related uses include manufacturers of ship parts large enough that transportation becomes a significant factor in the product’s cost; professional services for primarily water- dependent activities and storage of water-transported foods. Other examples of water-related uses may include the warehousing of goods transported by water, seafood processing plants, hydroelectric generating plants, gravel storage when transported by barge, oil refineries where transport is by tanker, and log storage for water-borne transportation. (hi) “Watershed” means a geographic region within which water drains into a particular river, stream or body of water. (i(j) “Water system” means purveyors serving connections and providing water capacity per WAC 246-290 . (k) ***“Wetlands” means areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs and similar areas. Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created for nonwetland sites, including, but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities or those wetlands created after July 1, 1990, that were unintentionally created as a result of the construction of a road, street, or highway. Wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from nonwetland areas to mitigate the conversion of wetlands. Commented [LG28]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations "water system" WAC 173-26-241 (3) (l) Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 51/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (jl) “Windthrow” means a natural process by which trees are uprooted or sustain severe trunk damage by the wind. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. II)] Article III. Master Program Goals 18.25.110 Purpose. This article describes the overall goals of the master program, which apply to all uses and developments within shoreline jurisdiction regardless of the designated shoreline environment in which they occur. These goals are informed by Chapter 173-26 WAC and the governing principles described in Article I of this chapter. The general policies and regulations in Article VI of this chapter and the specific use policies and regulations in Articles VII and VIII of this chapter are the means by which these goals are implemented. Achievement of these goals shall be consistent with the state’s policies of avoiding cumulative impacts and ensuring no net loss of shoreline processes, functions, and values. These goals are not listed in order of priority. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. III)] 18.25.120 Conservation. (1) Purpose. As required by RCW 90.58.100(2)(f), the conservation goals address the protection of natural resources, scenic vistas, aesthetics, and vital shoreline areas for fisheries and wildlife for the benefit of present and future generations. (2) Goals. (a) Preserve, enhance and protect shoreline resources (i.e., wetlands, intertidal areas, and other fish and wildlife habitats) for their ecological functions and values, and aesthetic and scenic qualities. (b) Maintain and sustain natural shoreline formation processes through effective shoreline management. (c) Promote restoration and enhancement of areas that are biologically and/or aesthetically degraded while maintaining appropriate use of the shoreline. (d) Protect and enhance native shoreline vegetation to maintain water quality, fish and wildlife habitat, and other ecological functions, values and processes. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. III § 1)] (e) Foster environmental stewardship, preserve clean air and water, and protect fish and wildlife habitat. Anticipate and respond to climate change with mitigation and adaptation strategies.(County Comprehensive Plan Framework Goal VI) [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. III § 1)] 18.25.130 Economic development. (1) Purpose. As required by RCW 90.58.100(2)(a), the economic development goals address the location and design of industries, transportation facilities, port facilities, tourist facilities, commerce and other developments that are particularly dependent on their location on or use of the shorelines. (2) Goals. (a) Encourage viable, orderly economic growth through economic activities that benefit the local economy and are environmentally sensitive. Such activities should not disrupt or degrade the shoreline or surrounding environment. Commented [LG29]: Comp. Plan Framework Goal VI Environmental Conservation Commented [LG30R29]: Task Force C Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 52/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (b) Accommodate and promote water-oriented industrial and commercial uses and developments, giving highest preference to water-dependent uses. (c) Encourage water-oriented recreational use as an economic asset that will enhance public enjoyment of the shoreline. (d) Encourage economic development in areas already partially developed with similar uses when consistent with this program and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. (e) Promote the heritage and culture of marine trades in Jefferson County. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. III § 2)] 18.25.140 Historic, archaeological, cultural, scientific and educational resources. (1) Purpose. As required by RCW 90.58.100(2)(g), these goals address protection and restoration of buildings, sites and areas having historic, archaeological, cultural, scientific, or educational significance. (2) Goals. (a) Maintain finite and irreplaceable links to the past by identifying, preserving, protecting, and where appropriate, restoring historic, archaeological, cultural, scientific, and educational (HACSE) sites. (b) Protect HACSE sites and buildings identified on national, state or local historic registers from destruction or alteration, and from encroachment by incompatible uses. (c) Acquire, where feasible, HACSE sites to ensure their protection and preservation for present and future generations. (d) Foster greater appreciation for shoreline management, maritime activities, environmental conservation, natural history and cultural heritage by educating and informing citizens of all ages through diverse means. (e) Ensure that tribal organizations and the State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation are involved in the review of projects that could potentially affect such resources. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. III § 3)] 18.25.150 Public access. (1) Purpose. As required by RCW 90.58.100(2)(b), the public access goals address the ability of the public to reach, touch, and travel on the shorelines of the state and to view the water and the shoreline from adjacent locations. (2) Goals. (a) Develop, adopt, and implement a shoreline public access plan that incorporates public access into new shoreline development, unifies individual public access points into a comprehensive system, and seeks new waterfront access points that can be acquired for public use. (b) Evaluate potential public access opportunities when reviewing all shoreline development projects except for individual single-family residential development projects. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 53/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (c) Acquire property (i.e., through purchase, donation or other agreement) to provide public access to the water’s edge in appropriate and suitable locations. (d) Regulate shoreline use and development to minimize interference with the public’s use of the water and protect the public’s opportunity to enjoy the physical and aesthetic qualities of shorelines, including views of the water. (e) Expand opportunities for physical and visual public access to shorelines when such access can occur without human health, safety, and/or security risks, and without adverse effects on shoreline functions, processes, values, private property rights, and/or neighboring uses. (f) Incorporate educational and interpretive signage and other tools into public access facilities to enhance the public’s understanding and appreciation of shoreline ecology, cultural history and maritime heritage. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. III § 4)] 18.25.160 Recreation. (1) Purpose. As required by RCW 90.58.100(2)(c), the recreation goals address the creation and expansion of water-oriented public recreational opportunities including, but not limited to, parks, tidelands, beaches, and ecological study areas. (2) Goals. (a) Encourage diverse recreational opportunities in shoreline areas that can support such use and development without human health, safety, and/or security risks, and without adverse effects on shoreline functions, processes, values, private property rights, and/or neighboring uses. (b) Plan for future shoreline recreation needs and acquire (i.e., through purchase, donation or other agreement) shoreline areas that have a high potential to provide recreation areas. (c) Provide for both active and passive recreational needs when developing recreational areas. (d) Support other governmental and nongovernmental efforts to acquire and develop additional shoreline properties for public recreational uses. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. III § 5)] 18.25.170 Restoration and enhancement. (1) Purpose. As required by WAC 173-26-186, the restoration and enhancement goals address reestablishment, rehabilitation and improvement of impaired shoreline ecological functions, values and/or processes. (2) Goals. (a) Improve shoreline functions, processes, and values over time through regulatory, voluntary and incentive-based public and private programs and actions that are consistent with the shoreline master program restoration plan and other agency adopted restoration plans. (b) Encourage cooperative restoration programs between local, state, and federal public agencies, tribes, nonprofit organizations, and landowners. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 54/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (c) Provide fundamental support to restoration work by various organizations by identifying shoreline restoration priorities, and by organizing information on available funding sources for restoration implementation. (d) Implement actions that restore shoreline ecological functions, values and processes as well as shoreline features, improve habitat for sensitive and/or locally important species, and are consistent with biological recovery goals for threatened salmon populations and other species and/or populations for which a recovery plan is available. (e) Integrate restoration efforts with other parallel natural resource management efforts including, but not limited to, shellfish closure response plans and water quality cleanup plans. (f) Increase the availability, viability and sustainability of shoreline habitats for salmon, shellfish, forage fish, shorebirds and marine seabirds, and other species. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. III § 6)] 18.25.180 Shoreline use. (1) Purpose. As required by RCW 90.58.100(2)(e), the shoreline use goals address the general distribution, location, and extent of housing, business, industry, transportation, agriculture, natural resources, aquaculture, recreation, education, navigation, and other categories of public and private land use. (2) Goals. (a) Ensure that shoreline use patterns are compatible with the ecological functions and values of the shoreline and avoid disruption of natural shoreline processes. (b) Increase protection of shoreline ecological resources by properly siting and regulating water- dependent and residential uses that have preferred status for use of waterfront lands. (c) Encourage appropriate sustainable, low impact, and cluster development practices whenever feasible. (d) Encourage uses that allow for or include restoration so that areas affected by past activities or catastrophic events can be improved. (e) Ensure that all new development is consistent with the Land Use and Rural Element and other pertinent sections of the Comprehensive Plan and the Growth Management Act (Chapter 36.70A RCW). (f) Limit development intensity in ecologically sensitive and fragile areas. (g) Reduce health and safety risks by limiting development in areas subject to flooding, erosion, landslides, channel migration, and other hazards. (h) Reserve aquatic lands including tidelands for water-dependent uses. (i) Protect tidelands and bedlands that were acquired and retained under the Bush and Callow Acts by not permitting unrelated uses on these tidelands. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 55/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (j) Encourage all use and development to address potential adverse effects of global climate change and sea level rise. (k) Allow residential, commercial, and industrial development in a manner that minimizes risk from flooding, earth movement, shoreline erosion, sea level rise, and other natural hazards (County Comprehensive Plan Policy LU-P-7.2) (l) Ensure that land use decisions consider climate change, and are based on land use ordinances which are in compliance with the Critical Areas Ordinance and all applicable state environmental laws. (Comprehensive Plan Policy LU-P-7.1) (m) Develop information and action plans regarding impacts to land use from climate change, including protecting or moving infrastructure from inundation areas; review of hydrologic budgets and water impoundment and conservation measures for changing precipitation patterns; and protection of water quality from seawater intrusion or other pollutants to drinking water quality. (Comprehensive Plan Policy LU-P-7.3) (n) Promote climate change adaptation measures that: (i) prioritize retreat measures for new development or new infrastructure investments and allow for feasible planned relocations or realignments of existing development and infrastructure; (ii) accommodate shoreline uses and activities that are saltwater and flood tolerant; (iii) protect existing development and infrastructure that is consistent with this SMP and is infeasible to be relocated or realigned. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. III § 7)] 18.25.190 Transportation, utilities and essential public facilities. (1) Purpose. As required by RCW 90.58.100(2)(d), the transportation and essential public facilities goals address circulation and the general location and extent of thoroughfares, transportation routes, terminals, and other public utilities and facilities. (2) Goals. (a) Develop efficient and economical transportation systems and other essential public facilities in a manner that assures the safe movement of people and goods and that effectively provides other essential services without adverse effects on shoreline use and development or shoreline ecological functions, processes, or values. (b) Provide and/or enhance physical and visual public shoreline access along public roads (i.e., turnouts, viewpoints and rest areas) in accordance with the public access provisions of this program. (c) Provide for alternative modes of travel when developing circulation systems and ensure consistency with the Jefferson County nonmotorized transportation and recreational trails plan. (d) Locate, construct and maintain new transportation and other essential public facilities in areas that do not require shoreline stabilization, dredging, extensive cut/fill and other forms of shoreline alteration. Commented [LG31]: Comp Plan Policy: LU-P-7.2 Commented [LG32R31]: Task Force C Commented [LG33]: Comp Plan Policy LU-P-7.1 Commented [LG34R33]: Task Force C Commented [LG35]: Comp Plan Policy LU-P-7.3 Commented [LG36R35]: Task Force C Commented [LG37]: See research. Retreat, accommodate, and protect. Commented [LG38R37]: Task Force C Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 56/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (e) Identify road and public infrastructure developments that interfere with natural processes, require shoreline armoring, or have exorbitant maintenance needs. Prioritize relocation of such facilities to more environmentally sustainable and economically sensible locations. (f) Consider potential effects of climate change when making siting decisions for capital facilities, also with consideration of the land use and environment goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. (Comprehensive Plan Policy CF-P-4.3) [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. III § 8)] Article IV. Shoreline Jurisdiction and Environment Designations 18.25.200 Shoreline jurisdiction and mapping. (1) The provisions of this program shall apply to all shorelines of the state in unincorporated Jefferson County including all freshwater and saltwater shorelines, shorelines of statewide significance and all shorelands as defined in Article II of this chapter and RCW 90.58.030., also listed at .890. These areas are collectively referred to herein as “shorelines.” The official shoreline map adopted with this program (Appendix A attached to the ordinance codified in this chapter) shows the general location and approximate extent of such shorelines. (2) The official shoreline map shows the environment designations that apply to each segment of the shoreline planning area. The official shoreline map is for planning purposes only. It does not necessarily identify or depict the precise lateral extent of shoreline jurisdiction or all associated wetlands. The lateral extent of the shoreline jurisdiction at the parcel level shall be determined on a case-by-case basis at the time a shoreline development is proposed. The actual extent of shoreline jurisdiction requires a site-specific evaluation to identify the location of the ordinary high water mark and any associated wetlands. (3) The county shall maintain a Geographic Information Systems database that depicts the coordinates for locating the upstream extent of shoreline jurisdiction (that is, the location where the mean annual stream flow is at least 20 cubic feet per second). The database shall also show the limits of the floodplain, floodway, and channel migration zones, and such information shall be used, along with site- specific information on the location of the ordinary high water mark and associated wetlands, to determine the lateral extent of shoreline jurisdiction on a parcel-by-parcel basis. The database shall be updated regularly as new information is made available and the public shall have access to the database upon request. (4) All areas within shoreline jurisdiction that are not mapped and/or not designated shall be designated conservancy until the area is redesignated through a master program amendment, except: (a) within the Quinault Indian Nation reservation where the upland designation shall be natural and the waterward designation shall be priority aquatic. (b) The shoreline environment designation in ocean coastal areas waterward of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) extending to the westernmost boundary of the state of Washington shall be priority aquatic. (c) Riverine shorelines of the state in the west end shall be aquatic below the OHWM. Commented [LG39]: Comp Plan Policy CF-P-4.3 Commented [LG40R39]: Task Force C Commented [LG41]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations west end rivers clarification Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 57/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (5) If disagreement develops as to the exact location of a shoreline environment designation boundary line shown on the official shoreline map, the following rules shall apply: (a) Boundaries indicated as approximately following lot, tract, or section lines shall be so construed. (b) Boundaries indicated as approximately following roads or railways shall be respectively construed to follow their centerlines. (c) Boundaries indicated as approximately parallel to or extensions of features indicated in subsections (5)(a) and (b) of this section. (d) Whenever existing physical features are inconsistent with boundaries on the official shoreline map, the administrator shall interpret the boundaries, with deference to actual conditions. Appeals of such interpretations may be filed pursuant to the applicable appeal procedures described in Article X of this chapter. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. IV § 1)] 18.25.210 Shoreline environment designations – Purpose and criteria. (1) Shoreline environment designations have been developed as a part of this program in accordance with WAC 173-26-211. The designations provide a systematic, rational, and equitable basis upon which to guide and regulate use and development within specific shoreline planning areas. (2) Shoreline environment designations are based on the following general factors, not listed in order of priority: (a) The ecological functions and processes that characterize the shoreline, together with the degree of human alteration as determined by the November 2008 Final Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report and subsequent technical analyses; and (b) The county’s goal of having coordinated planning for open space, public access and other aspects of shoreline management; and (c) Existing and planned development patterns, including county Comprehensive Plan designations; and (d) The county Comprehensive Plan goals for shorelines; and (e) The requirements outlined in WAC 173-26-211; and (f) Public demand for state-owned wilderness beaches, ecological study areas, and public access and recreational activities. (3) Shorelines in Jefferson County shall have one or more of the following designations: (a) Priority Aquatic (PA). (i) Purpose. The priority aquatic designation protects to the highest degree possible and, where feasible, restores waters and their underlying bedlands deemed vital for salmon and shellfish. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 58/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (ii) Designation Criteria. The priority aquatic designation is assigned to the most vital salmon streams and nearshore areas and the highest value marine shellfish habitats waterward of the ordinary high water mark. These shorelines have one or more of the following qualities: (A) Documented Endangered Species Act-listed salmonid streams and marine habitats (summer chum, chinook, and steelhead); (B) Estuaries that support Endangered Species Act-listed salmonid rearing; (C) Other freshwater shorelines that provide habitat for salmonid species (coho, fall chum, pink, and cutthroat) and are relatively undeveloped; (D) Intact drift cell processes (i.e., sediment source, transport, and deposition); (E) Documented forage fish spawning habitats (herring, surf smelt, sandlance); and/or (F) Important intertidal and subtidal shellfish areas (clam, oyster, crab, shrimp, and geoduck). (b) Aquatic (A). (i) Purpose. The aquatic designation protects, manages, and, where feasible, restores lake, stream, and marine waters and their underlying bedlands that are not designated as priority aquatic. (ii) Designation Criteria. The aquatic designation is assigned to all stream, lake and marine shoreline areas waterward of the ordinary high water mark if the area does not meet the criteria for the priority aquatic designation. (c) Natural (N). (i) Purpose. The natural designation protects from harm or adverse impact shoreline areas that are intact, have minimally degraded functions and processes, or are relatively free of human influence. (ii) Designation Criteria. The natural designation is assigned to shoreline areas landward of the ordinary high water mark if any of the following characteristics apply: (A) The shoreline is mostly ecologically intact and therefore currently performing an important or irreplaceable function or process that would be damaged by human activity; or (B) The shoreline, whether minimally disturbed or intact, represents an ecosystem type or geologic feature that is of particular scientific and/or educational interest; or (C) The shoreline contains undisturbed wetlands, estuaries, feeder bluffs, unstable slopes, coastal dunes, and/or accretional spits; or (D) The shoreline is unable to support new development or uses without significant adverse impacts to ecological functions or processes; or Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 59/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (E) The shoreline has the potential to regain natural conditions with minimal or no restoration activity; or (F) The shoreline possesses serious development limitations or human health and safety risks due to the presence of environmental hazards related to flooding, channel migration, erosion or landslides and similar occurrences. (d) Conservancy (C). (i) Purpose. The conservancy designation provides for sustained use of resource lands and other relatively undeveloped shorelines while protecting ecological functions, conserving natural, historic and cultural resources, and providing recreational opportunities. (ii) Designation Criteria. A conservancy designation is assigned to shoreline areas landward of the ordinary high water mark if they do not meet the criteria for the natural designation and if any of the following characteristics apply: (A) The shoreline is relatively undeveloped or currently supporting resource-based uses; or (B) The shoreline can support low impact outdoor recreational activities; or (C) The shoreline is predominantly low density rural residential use (RR 1:10, RR 1:20); or (D) The shoreline can support low density residential development and low intensity water- oriented uses, including some commercial and industrial uses, without significant adverse impacts to shoreline functions or processes; or (E) The shoreline is a good candidate for ecological restoration. (e) Shoreline Residential (SR). (i) Purpose. The shoreline residential designation accommodates residential development and accessory structures that are properly located and designed, in areas where high density residential developments and services exist or are planned. (ii) Designation Criteria. The shoreline residential designation is assigned to shoreline areas landward of the ordinary high water mark if they do not meet the criteria for the natural, conservancy or high intensity environments, and if any of the following characteristics apply: (A) The shoreline is within an urban growth area (UGA); or master planned resort (MPR); or designated high density rural residential area (RR 1:5); or (B) The shoreline is predominantly high density (RR 1:5) single-family or multifamily residential development or is planned and platted for high density (RR 1:5) residential development. (f) High Intensity (HI). (i) Purpose. The high intensity designation ensures continued use of shorelines that are either presently used for commercial, industrial, or other high intensity nonresidential purposes or Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 60/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. provide future economic development or recreational opportunities at a higher scale and intensity than can be achieved in more ecologically sensitive areas. (ii) Designation Criteria. The high intensity designation is assigned to shorelines landward of the ordinary high water mark if they do not meet the criteria for the natural, conservancy or shoreline residential environments if any of the following characteristics apply: (A) The shoreline is within an urban growth area (UGA), rural commercial area, or rural industrial area and is suitable for high intensity uses; or (B) The shoreline is currently used for industrial, commercial or other high intensity nonresidential uses and is suitable for ongoing high intensity use. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. IV § 2)] 18.25.220 Uses allowed in each shoreline environment designation. (1) Each shoreline environment designation shall be managed in accordance with its designated purpose as described in this section. Table 18.25.220 shows the permitted uses, conditional uses and prohibited uses for each environment designation. The requirements governing each use are described in Articles VI, VII and VIII of this program. The permit criteria are described in Article IX of this chapter and the administrative standards including the review procedures are described in Article X of this chapter. Table 18.25.220 is intended to illustrate the text of the master program. In the event discrepancies exist, the text shall govern. Table 18.25.220 – Permitted, Conditional and Prohibited Uses by Shoreline Environment Designation P = Use may be permitted subject to policies and regulations of program. May require shoreline substantial development permit or statement of exemption approval. See Articles VI, VII, VIII, IX, X and/or XXII of this chapter for details. C(a) = Conditional use administrative. See Articles II, IX, X, and XXII of this chapter for definition, criteria and process details. C(d) = Conditional use discretionary. See Articles II, IX, X, and XXII of this chapter for definition, criteria and process details. X = Prohibited use. * = Exceptions and limitations may apply as noted in this program. See specific section for details. Shoreline Uses Environment Designations Waterward of OHWM Landward of OHWM Priority Aquatic Aquatic Natural Conservancy Shoreline Residential High Intensity Agriculture X X X* P P P Aquaculture: Aquaculture activities other than geoduck, in-water finfish, and upland finfish. P P P P P P Geoduck (new) PC(d)* PC(d)* C(d))* C(d))* C(d))* PC(d)* In-water finfish (including net pens) X C(d) X*/C(d) X X C(d) Upland finfish X C(d) X C(d) X C(d) Commented [LG42]: 2011 b Periodic Checklist Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 61/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. P = Use may be permitted subject to policies and regulations of program. May require shoreline substantial development permit or statement of exemption approval. See Articles VI, VII, VIII, IX, X and/or XXII of this chapter for details. C(a) = Conditional use administrative. See Articles II, IX, X, and XXII of this chapter for definition, criteria and process details. C(d) = Conditional use discretionary. See Articles II, IX, X, and XXII of this chapter for definition, criteria and process details. X = Prohibited use. * = Exceptions and limitations may apply as noted in this program. See specific section for details. Shoreline Uses Environment Designations Waterward of OHWM Landward of OHWM Priority Aquatic Aquatic Natural Conservancy Shoreline Residential High Intensity Beach Access Structures: P P C(a) P P P Public C(a)* C(a)*P C(a)* C(a)P C(a)P C(a)P Private, accessory to single-family residential development X C(a)* X C(a) C(a)P C(a)P Boating Facilities: Boat launches (nonresidential) P* P* C(a)* C(a)P P P Boat launches (residential) X* P* C(a)* C(a) P P Docks, piers, floats, lifts (nonresidential) P* P* C(d)* C(a)* P* P Docks, piers, floats, lifts (residential) X* P* X C(a) P P Float plane moorage X C(d) X C(a) C(a) P Industrial piers P* P* X X X P Marinas X P* X C(d) C(d) P Mooring buoys P* P* C(a)* C(a)P C(a)*P P Commercial Development: Water-dependent (recreation) C(d) P C(d) C(d) P P Water-dependent or water-related (nonrecreation) X X X C(d) P P Water-related (recreation) X P X X P P Water-enjoyment X X X C(d) P P Non-water-oriented X X X X* C(d) C(d) Dredging C(d) C(d) X* C(d) C(d) P Dredge Disposal C(d) C(d) X* C(d) C(d) C(d) Disposal of waste products, ocean use X X X X X X Filling and Excavation C(d) C(d) X* C(d) P P Flood Control Structures C(d) C(d) X C(d) C(d) C(d) Commented [LG43]: Task Force A, Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Deleted Cells Deleted Cells Deleted Cells Deleted Cells Deleted Cells Deleted Cells Commented [LG44]: Task Force B Commented [LG46]: Respond to October 2020 Ecology Checklist addressing 2018 Marine Spatial Plan Commented [LG45]: Respond to October 2020 Ecology Checklist addressing 2018 Marine Spatial Plan Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 62/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. P = Use may be permitted subject to policies and regulations of program. May require shoreline substantial development permit or statement of exemption approval. See Articles VI, VII, VIII, IX, X and/or XXII of this chapter for details. C(a) = Conditional use administrative. See Articles II, IX, X, and XXII of this chapter for definition, criteria and process details. C(d) = Conditional use discretionary. See Articles II, IX, X, and XXII of this chapter for definition, criteria and process details. X = Prohibited use. * = Exceptions and limitations may apply as noted in this program. See specific section for details. Shoreline Uses Environment Designations Waterward of OHWM Landward of OHWM Priority Aquatic Aquatic Natural Conservancy Shoreline Residential High Intensity Forest Practices X X P P P P In-Stream Structures C(d) C(d) X* C(d) C(d) C(d) Industrial and Port Development: Water-oriented X C(d) X C(d) C(d)* P Non-water-oriented X X X X* X*/C(d) C(d) Mining X X X* X* X* C(d) Ocean oil and gas uses and activities X X X X X X Parking: Accessory to permitted use X X X* P/C(d) P/C(d) P/C(d) Primary use X X X X X X Recreation: Water-oriented P* P* P* P* P P Non-water-oriented X X X X C(d) X Underwater parks C(a) C(a) N/A N/A N/A N/A Residential: Single-family (and normal appurtenances) X X C(a) P P P Accessory structures associated with single-family development (other than beach access structures, boating facilities, and boathouses) X X X C(a) P P Boathouses accessory to single-family residences X X X C(a) C(a) C(a) Multifamily X X X P* P P Restoration and Enhancement P P P P P P Shore Armor/Stabilization: Nonstructural stabilization, including bioengineering and biostabilization P P P P P P Commented [LG47]: Respond to October 2020 Ecology Checklist addressing 2018 Marine Spatial Plan Commented [AS48]: For clarity, added “including bioengineering” as the definition of shoreline stabilization specifically states that it is for nonstructural methods and includes bioengineering. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 63/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. P = Use may be permitted subject to policies and regulations of program. May require shoreline substantial development permit or statement of exemption approval. See Articles VI, VII, VIII, IX, X and/or XXII of this chapter for details. C(a) = Conditional use administrative. See Articles II, IX, X, and XXII of this chapter for definition, criteria and process details. C(d) = Conditional use discretionary. See Articles II, IX, X, and XXII of this chapter for definition, criteria and process details. X = Prohibited use. * = Exceptions and limitations may apply as noted in this program. See specific section for details. Shoreline Uses Environment Designations Waterward of OHWM Landward of OHWM Priority Aquatic Aquatic Natural Conservancy Shoreline Residential High Intensity Structural armoring, river and marine – nonresidential C(a)* C(a)* C(a)* C(a)* C(a)* C(a)* Structural armoring, river and marine – residential X X X C(a)* C(a)* C(a)* Structural armoring, lakes X X X X X X Signs P* P* X* P P P Transportation: Serving an allowed use C(d) C(d) X* P P P Not serving a specific allowed use C(d) C(d) X* C(d)* C(d)* C(d)* Ocean transportation C(d) X X X X X Utilities: Essential public facilities C(d)* C(d) X* C(d) P P Oil, gas and natural gas transmission lines C(d)* C(d) X* P* P* P Power/tidal energy generation facilities X C(d) X C(d) C(d) C(d) Desalinization plants X* X* X C(d) C(d) C(d) Sewage systems X* X* X* C(d) C(d) P Water systems X* X* X* C(d) C(d) P Electrical and communication lines C(d) C(d) X* P* P* P Other Ocean Uses Ocean salvage C(d) X X X X X Ocean research C(d) X X X X X [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. IV § 3)] Commented [LG49]: Respond to October 2020 Ecology Checklist addressing 2018 Marine Spatial Plan Commented [LG50]: Respond to October 2020 Ecology Checklist addressing 2018 Marine Spatial Plan Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 64/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. Article V. Shorelines of Statewide Significance 18.25.230 Adoption of policy. (1) In accordance with RCW 90.58.020, the county shall manage shorelines of statewide significance in accordance with this section and in accordance with this program as a whole. Preference shall be given to uses that are consistent with the statewide interest in such shorelines. Uses that are not consistent with this section or do not comply with the other applicable policies and regulations of this program shall not be permitted on shorelines of statewide significance. (2) In managing shorelines of statewide significance, Jefferson County shall give preference to uses in the following order of preference: (a) Recognize and protect the statewide interest over local interest; (b) Preserve the natural character of the shoreline; (c) Seek long-term benefits over short-term benefit; (d) Protect the resources and ecology of the shoreline; (e) Increase public access to publicly owned areas of the shoreline; (f) Increase recreational opportunities for the public in the shoreline; and (g) Provide for any other element as defined in RCW 90.58.100 deemed appropriate or necessary. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. V § 1)] 18.25.240 Designation of shorelines of statewide significance. In accordanceAs defined herein and consistent with RCW 90.58.030(2)(ef), the following Jefferson County shorelines are designated shorelines of statewide significance: (1) Shorelines of natural rivers or segments thereof, including Pacific Ocean – all areas from the northern County boundary near Teawhit Head to the southern County boundary near Queets extending seaward to the Washington western boundary; and (2) Rivers - portions of the Bogachiel, Clearwater, Hoh, and Quinault Rivers, that are downstream from athe point where the mean annual flow equals of 1,000 cubic feet per second or moremean annual flow, including shorelands; and (2) The waters of3) Hood Canal – all areas south of the line from Tala Point and Foulweather Bluff, between the ordinary high water mark and the line of extreme low tide south of the line between Tala Point and Foulweather Bluff, including shorelands; and (3) Those areas of(4) Puget Sound and the Strait of Juan de Fuca and adjacent salt waters– all areas extending north to the Canadian line and lyingboundary that are seaward fromof the line of extreme low tide. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. V § 2)] 18.25.250 Use preference. To ensure that statewide interests are protected over local interests, the county shall review all development proposals within shorelines of statewide significance for consistency with RCW 90.58.030, Commented [LG51]: Task Force F Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 65/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. this program, and the following, which are not listed in priority order preferences and management principles: (1) When shoreline development or redevelopment occurs, it shall include restoration and/or enhancement of ecological conditions if such opportunities exist; (2(1) Use Preference: Recognize and protect the statewide interest over local interest. Management Principles: (a) State and federal resource agencies, co-managers, and tribes, shall be consulted for development proposals that affect anadromous fish, shellfish, marine birds, and other shoreline resources; (3(b) The County should consider state agencies' policies, programs, and recommendations in developing and administering use regulations. (c) Relevant to the proposal’s nature, scale, or rarity, the County should solicit comments, opinions, and advice from individuals with expertise in ecology, oceanography, geology, limnology, aquaculture, and other scientific fields pertinent to shoreline management. (2) Use Preference: Preserve the natural character of the shoreline. Management Principles: (a) When shoreline development or redevelopment occurs, it shall include restoration and/or enhancement of ecological conditions if such opportunities exist; (b) Areas that are subject to commercial timber harvest pursuant to the Forest Practices Act and RCW 90.58.150 should be reforested as soon as possible and in accordance with the Forest Practices Act and the Forest and Fish Report; (4c) Uses that are sustainable, that do not deplete natural resources, and that are compatible with other approved uses shall be preferred over uses that do not have these qualities; (5) Uses that provide long-term benefits shall be preferred over uses that provide only short-term gains; (6) Uses that preserve aesthetic qualities shall be preferred over uses that impact aesthetic qualities; (7(iv) The County should promote upgrade and redevelopment of those areas where intensive development already exists, in order to reduce their adverse impact on the environment and to accommodate future growth rather than allowing high intensity uses to extend into low intensity use or underdeveloped areas. (3) Use Preference: Seek long-term benefits over short-term benefit Management Principles: (a) The range of options for shoreline use should be preserved to the maximum possible extent for succeeding generations. Development that consumes valuable, scarce or irreplaceable natural resources should not be permitted if alternative sites are available. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 66/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (b) The County should evaluate the short-term economic gain or convenience of developments in relationship to long-term and potentially costly impairments to the natural environment. (c) The County should actively promote aesthetic considerations when contemplating new development, redevelopment of existing facilities, or for the general enhancement of shoreline areas. (4) Use Preference: Protect the resources and ecology of the shoreline; Management Principles: (a) Uses that require a shoreline location shall be preferred over non-water-related uses. Non- water-related uses should be located outside the shoreline jurisdiction or in areas where they will not interfere with or displace preferred uses or public access; (8b) Commercial shellfish beds, areas that support recreation and tourism, and other economic resources of statewide importance shall be protected; (9c) Uses that have the potential to cause significant erosion and sedimentation due to excavation, land clearing, or other activities shall be strictly regulated to prevent adverse impacts to shoreline functions and processes; (10(5) Use Preference: Increase public access to publicly owned areas of the shoreline; Management Principles: (a) All public access and recreation use and development shall be designed to protect the ecological resources upon which such activities depend; and (11b) Public and private development shall be encouraged to provide trails, viewpoints, water access points and water-related recreation opportunities where conditions are appropriate for such uses. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. V § 3)] (6) Use Preference: Increase recreational opportunities for the public in the shoreline Management Principles: (a) The County should encourage development of facilities for recreational use of the shorelines. (b Development not requiring a waterside or shoreline location should be located inland so that lawful public enjoyment of shorelines is enhanced. Article VI. General Policies and Regulations 18.25.260 Applicability. The policies and regulations in this article apply to all uses and developments in all shoreline environments. The policies and regulations are not listed in order of priority. These policies and regulations: (1) Help to implement the master program goals in Article III of this chapter; and (2) Are informed by the governing principles in Article I of this chapter; and Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 67/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (3) Work in concert with all the other policies and regulations contained in this program; and (4) Are based on the state shoreline guidelines (Chapter 173-26 WAC). [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VI)] 18.25.270 Critical areas, shoreline buffers, and ecological protection. (1) Policies. (a) All shoreline use and development should be carried out in a manner that avoids and minimizes adverse impacts on the shoreline environment. Uses and developments that may cause the future ecological condition to become worse than current condition should not be allowed. Use and development in areas that are ecologically valuable, hazardous, and/or possess rare or fragile natural features should be discouraged. Critical areas within shoreline jurisdiction should be protected to a level that assures no net loss of shoreline ecological functions necessary to sustain shoreline natural resources. (b) In assessing the potential for new uses and developments to cause adverse impacts, the county should take into account all of the following: (i) Effects on ecological functions and ecosystem processes; and (ii) Effects that occur on site and effects that may occur off site; and (iii) Immediate effects and long-term effects; and (iv) Direct effects of the project and indirect effects; and (v) Individual effects of the project and the incremental or cumulative effects resulting from the project added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions; and (vi) Compensatory mitigation actions that offset adverse impacts of the development action and/or use. (c) The county should recognize and honor buffers and setbacks established by existing plats, preliminary plats, issued permits, binding site plans (BSPs) and site plan approval advance determinations (SPAADs), and by development agreements that are consistent with Chapter 36.70B RCW. (d) The county should work with other local, state, and federal regulatory agencies and resource management agencies to ensure that mitigation actions carried out in support of this program are likely to be successful and achieve beneficial ecological outcomes. This includes assisting applicants/proponents in planning, designing and implementing mitigation. (e) Single-family residential development on nonconforming lots should not substantially impair the view of the adjacent residences. (2) Regulations – No Net Loss and Mitigation. (a) All shoreline use and development, including preferred uses and uses that are exempt from permit requirements, shall be located, designed, constructed, conducted, and maintained in a manner that maintains shoreline ecological processes and functions. Commented [LG52]: Checklist 2010.a Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 68/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (b) Uses and developments that cause a net loss of ecological functions and processes shall be prohibited. Any use or development that causes the future ecological condition to become worse than current condition shall be prohibited. (c) Proponents of new shoreline use and development shall employ measures to mitigate adverse impacts on shoreline functions and processes. (d) Mitigation shall include the following actions in order of priority: (i) Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; (ii) Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation by using appropriate technology or by taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts; (iii) Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment; (iv) Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations; (v) Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments; (vi) Monitoring the impact and the compensation projects and taking appropriate corrective measures. (e) Mitigation actions shall not have a significant adverse impact on other shoreline uses fostered by the policies of the Shoreline Management Act. (f) When compensatory mitigation measures are required, all of the following shall apply: (i) The quality and quantity of the replaced, enhanced, or substituted resources shall be the same or better than the affected resources; and (ii) The mitigation site and associated vegetative planting shall be nurtured and maintained such that healthy native plant communities can grow and mature over time; and (iii) The mitigation shall be informed by pertinent scientific and technical studies, including but not limited to the Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report (Final – Revised November 2008), the Shoreline Restoration Plan (Final October 2008) and other background studies prepared in support of this program; and (iv) The mitigation shall replace the functions as quickly as possible following the impacts to ensure no net loss; and (v) The mitigation activity shall be monitored and maintained to ensure that it achieves its intended functions and values. The monitoring timeframes shall be consistent with JCC 18.22.740. (vi) The county shall require the applicant/proponent to post a bond or provide other financial surety equal to the estimated cost of the mitigation in order to ensure the mitigation is carried Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 69/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. out successfully. The bond/surety shall be refunded to the applicant/proponent upon completion of the mitigation activity and any required monitoring. (g) Mitigation credit. To encourage shoreline property owners to remove bulkheads and perform other beneficial shoreline restoration actions in advance of shoreline development or redevelopment, the county may give mitigation credit to any beneficial restoration action that occurred within five years of the proposed development/redevelopment activity; provided, that: (i) The applicant/property owner can provide conclusive evidence of the pre- and post- restoration conditions using photographs, reports, plans, affidavits, or similar evidence; (ii) The county can confirm via site inspection, photographs, affidavits or other evidence that the restoration actions have improved shoreline conditions; and (iii) The applicant/property owner provides assurances that the restoration area will be maintained in perpetuity. The assurance can be in the form of a notice on title, conservation easement, or similar mechanism. (h) Compensatory mitigation measures shall occur in the vicinity of the impact or at an alternative location within the same watershed or appropriate section of marine shoreline (e.g., reach or drift cell) that provides greater and more sustainable ecological benefits. When determining whether off-site mitigation provides greater and more sustainable benefits, the county shall consider limiting factors, critical habitat needs, and other factors identified by the locally adopted shoreline restoration plan (October 2008 or as updated), or an approved watershed or comprehensive resource management plan. The county may also approve use of alternative mitigation practices such as in-lieu fee programs, certified mitigation banks, and other similar approaches, provided they have been approved and sanctioned by the Department of Ecology, the Puget Sound Partnership, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.. (i) Land that is constrained by critical areas and/or buffers shall not be subdivided to create parcels that are only buildable through a shoreline variance or would be considered nonconforming. (3) Regulations – Cumulative Impacts. (a) The county shall consider the cumulative impacts of individual uses and developments, including preferred uses and uses that are exempt from permit requirements, when determining whether a proposed use or development could cause a net loss of ecological functions. (b) The county shall have the authority to require the applicant/proponent to prepare special studies, assessments and analyses as necessary to identify and address cumulative impacts including, but not limited to, impacts on fish and wildlife habitat, public access/use, aesthetics, and other shoreline attributes. (c) Proponents of shoreline use and development shall take the following factors into account when assessing cumulative impacts: (i) Current ecological functions and human factors influencing shoreline natural processes; and (ii) Reasonably foreseeable future use and development of the shoreline; and Commented [LG53]: Clarification per WDFW responses. Commented [LG54]: 2009 b Periodic Checklist Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 70/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (iii) Beneficial effects of any established regulatory programs under other local, state, and federal laws; and (iv) Mitigation measures implemented in conjunction with the proposed project to avoid, reduce and/or compensate for adverse impacts. (d) The county shall prohibit any use or development that will result in unmitigated cumulative impacts. (4) Regulations – Critical Areas and Shoreline Buffers. (a) Critical areas provisions of Chapter 18.22 JCC, dated March 17, 200810, 2020 (Ordinance No. Ord. 03-0317-08), and further amended in May 2009 (Ordinance No. 06-0511-09), and August 2010 (Ordinance No. 04-0809-105-20 § 2) are incorporated by reference; however, the following exceptions shall prevail for actions occurring within shoreline jurisdiction: (i) All provisions listed in subsections (4)(b) through (l) and (5)(a) through (d) of this section (e.g., building setback, buffers, CASPs, reasonable use, nonconforming lots, water-oriented use/development) and provisions found in JCC 18.25.660 (i.e., nonconforming development), shall be governed by this program and not Chapter 18.22 JCC; and (ii) Sections of Chapter 18.22 JCC, Article II of this chapter and other sections of JCC Title 18 regarding permit process, administrative, nonconforming use, appeal, and enforcement provisions within shoreline jurisdiction shall be governed by this program and not Chapter 18.22 JCC. (b) In the event development or performance standards in Chapter 18.22 JCC are inconsistent with standards and requirements in this program, this program shall govern. (c) Unless otherwise specified in this program, a shoreline buffer zone shall be established landward of all shorelines of the state to protect and maintain ecological functions and processes and to minimize risks to human health and safety. Critical area buffers shall apply to all critical areas located in shoreline jurisdiction. All buffers shall be maintained in a predominantly natural, undisturbed, undeveloped, and vegetated condition. Buffers shall not extend across lawfully established paved roads or hardened surfaces to include areas which are functionally isolated from the shoreline or critical area. (d) Building Setback. As established in Chapter 18.22 JCC, all new uses and developments, including preferred uses and uses exempt from shoreline permit requirements, shall be located landward of the standard buffer plus a 10-foot-wide building setback unless otherwise specified in this program. (e) Standard Shoreline Buffer. The standard shoreline buffer shall be measured landward in a horizontal direction perpendicular to the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of the shoreline water body, and is a three dimensional space that includes the airspace above, as follows: (i) Marine Shores. A minimum buffer of 150 feet shall be maintained in all shoreline environments. Commented [LG55]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations - SMP//CAO clarification Commented [LG56]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations refer to shorelines to avoid confusion with critical area buffers Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 71/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (ii) Lake Shores. A minimum buffer of 100 feet shall be maintained in all shoreline environments. (iii) Stream/River Shores. A minimum buffer of 150 feet shall be maintained in all shoreline environments. (f) The county shall recognize and apply a buffer or setback established by an existing plat, preliminary plat, issued permit, binding site plan (BSP), site plan approval advance determination (SPAAD), or a development agreement that is consistent with Chapter 36.70B RCW. (g) Multiple Buffers. In the event that buffers for any shorelines and/or critical areas are contiguous or overlapping, the landward-most edge of all such buffers and setbacks shall apply. (h) Buffer Condition. The area within a required shoreline buffer shall be kept in a sufficiently vegetated condition so as to ensure it protects and maintains the existing ecological functions. Existing native vegetation shall be retained, and planting of native vegetation is preferred. (i) Buffer Usage. When located to avoid areas of noted sensitivity and habitat, an area shall be permitted for “active use” within an approved buffer, provided the area does not exceed 20 percent of the required buffer area or is configured to span at least 15 linear feet of the water frontage, whichever is greater. “Active use” of a buffer includes lawn, clearing for views, trail/pathway, and portions of boating facility and beach access structures sited landward of OHWM. Such allowed ‘active use’ features should be clustered to minimize buffer impacts. This regulation shall not apply retroactively to legal pre-existing uses or structures except when new use or development is proposed..). (j) Buffer Reduction or Averaging. Proposals that request a decrease in the standard shoreline buffer of this program shall not require a shoreline variance if all of the approval criteria in JCC 18.22.640(1) and (2) are met. All other shoreline buffer reduction or shoreline buffer averaging proposals shall require a shoreline variance. (k) Increased Buffers. An increase in buffer width shall be required upon determination that the development would be: (i) Susceptible to severe erosion resulting in adverse impacts to the shoreline; or (ii) Susceptible to health and safety risks caused by stream or river channel migration; or (iii) Susceptible to health and safety risks caused by flooding – from sea, river/stream; or (iv) On steeply sloped (greater than 25 percent) land adjacent to the ordinary high water mark. (l) Alternative Protection via Critical Areas Stewardship Plans (CASPs). If a proponent of a shoreline use or development proposes to modify the buffer width requirement of an SMA-regulated waterbody using the CASP standards described in Article IX of Chapter 18.22.965 JCC, such buffer modification shall require a shoreline variance. If the proposed CASP buffer modification is for a wetland or habitat conservation area that is physically separated from the SMA-regulated waterbody, no shoreline variance shall be required.Type II Shoreline Substantial Development (SDP) permit. (5) Regulations – Exceptions to Critical Area and Shoreline Buffer Standards. Commented [LG57]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 72/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (a) Nonconforming Lots – Development Allowed without a Variance (Modest Home Provision). New singleSingle-family development on any legal lot in shoreline jurisdiction that is nonconforming with respect to the required buffer standards may be allowed without a shoreline variance when: (i) The depth of the lot (distance from the ordinary high water mark to the inside edge of the frontage setback) is equal to or less than the standard shoreline buffer as indicated in subsection (4)(e) of this section; and (ii) The building area lying landward of the shoreline buffer and interior to required sideyard setbacks is not more than 2,500 square feet and the driveway is not more than 1,100 square feet. The building area means the entire area that will be disturbed to construct the home, normal appurtenances (except drainfields), and landscaping; and (iii) All single-family residences approved under this section shall not extend waterward of the common-line buffer; and (iv) Appropriate measures are taken to mitigate all adverse impacts, including using low impact development measures such as pervious pavement for driveways and other hard surfaces; and (v) Opportunities to vary the side yard and/or frontage setbacks are implemented to reduce the nonconformity when doing so will not create a hazardous condition or a condition that is inconsistent with this program and Chapter 18.30 JCC; and (vi) The residence is located in the least environmentally damaging location relative to the shoreline and any critical areas; and (vii) There is no opportunity to consolidate lots under common ownership that will alleviate the nonconformity; and (viii) The lot is not subject to geologic hazards; and (ix) All structures are as far landward as possible and not closer than 30 feet from the ordinary high water mark; and (x) At least 80 percent of the buffer area between the structures and the shoreline and/or critical area is maintained in a naturally vegetated condition. (b) Nonconforming Lots – Common Line Buffer. For the purpose of accommodating shoreline views to be adequate and comparable to adjacent residences, but not necessarily equivalent, the administrator may reduce the standard buffer for a new single-family residence on nonconforming lots consistent with the following criteria: (i) The proposed residence must be located within 300 feet of an adjacent legally established single-family residential primary structure constructed prior to adoption of this program that encroaches on the standard buffer. The mere presence of nearby shacks, sheds or dilapidated buildings does not constitute the existence of a residence, nor can such structures be used to determine a common line buffer. The nearest corners of the adjacent residences are those closest to the side-yard property line of the proposed residence. Commented [LG58]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 73/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (ii) Existing Homes on Both Sides. Where there are existing residences adjacent on both sides of the proposed residence, the buffer shall be determined as the greater of either (A) a common line drawn between the nearest corners of each adjacent residence (see Figure 18.25.270(1)), or (B) a common line calculated by the average of both adjacent residences’ existing setbacks (i.e., (y+z)/2=x buffer; see Figure 18.25.270(2)). (iii) Existing Home on One Side. Where there is only one existing residence adjacent to the proposed residence, the common line buffer shall be determined as the greater of either (A) a common line drawn between nearest corner of the foundation for the adjacent residence and the nearest point of the standard buffer on the adjacent vacant lot (see Figure 18.25.270(3)), or (B) a common line calculated by the average of the adjacent residence’s setback and the standard buffer for the adjacent vacant lot (i.e., (y+z)/2=x buffer; see Figure 18.25.270(4)). (iv) Figures 18.25.270(1) through (4) illustrate examples of the common line buffer allowance. When discrepancy between the text and the graphic exists, the text shall govern. Graphics are for illustration only, buffer shall be measured perpendicularly from the ordinary high water mark as per this section. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 74/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. Figures 18.25.270(1) – (4) Figure 18.25.270(1) Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 75/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. Figure 18.25.270(2) Figure 18.25.270(3) Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 76/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. Figure 18.25.270(4) (c) Nonconforming Lots – Development Requiring a Variance. Development on nonconforming lots that do not meet the requirements of subsection (5)(a) or (b) of this section require a shoreline variance. (d) Water-Oriented Uses/Development. When otherwise consistent with this program and Chapter 18.22 JCC, the following water-oriented uses/developments may be permitted within a shoreline buffer without a shoreline variance. The amount and extent of buffer modification shall be the minimum needed to accommodate the allowed use/development. This allowance for water- oriented uses/developments within shoreline buffers without a shoreline variance may apply to the primary use and/or to the following accessory uses/structures: (i) Primary uses and structures that meet the definition of a water-dependent or water-related use/development as defined in Article II of this chapter. (ii) Boating facilities accessory to a single-family residential development including rails, docks, piers and floats; (iii) Boathouses accessory to a single-family residential development; provided, that all of the following are met: (A) The boathouse is used to store watercraft and shall not be used as or converted to a dwelling unit. The county shall require a notice on title indicating such; and (B) The boathouse has a maximum footprint of 300 square feet and a maximum height of 15 feet above average grade; and (C) The primary doorway/entryway faces the water; and (D) The structure is located entirely landward of the ordinary high water mark. (iv) Public or private beach access structures accessory to residential, commercial, industrial, port or other allowed uses/development; and Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 77/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (v) Public access structures, including but not limited to docks, piers, floats; and (vi) Certain utilities and essential public facilities as specified in JCC 18.25.530. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VI § 1)] (e) Nonconforming Septic Repair. The repair and replacement of an existing on-site sewage (OSS; or ‘septic’) system may be allowed in the buffer as an exemption under Section .560(2) of this Program if the system meets all the following criteria: (i) The 0SS system qualifies as legal nonconforming as defined in this Program; (ii) New tank, drainfield and reserve drainfield areas are sited to pose the least intrusive location given system design constraints and site constraints, including but not limited to existing legal development, critical areas, and topographical constraints; (iii) The new 0SS system is for replacement of a damaged/failed 0SS system with the equivalent capacity of the nonconforming system; and (iv) The replacement system does not increase the degree of nonconformity. (f) Stormwater Improvements. Stormwater improvements may be allowed in the buffer as an exemption under Section .560(2) of this Program when all the following criteria are met: (i) The stormwater improvement is appurtenant to an existing legal structure, a legal non- conforming structure, or an approved Site Plan Advance Approval Determination (SPAAD); (ii) Stormwater discharge cannot be accommodated on site or upland because it would compromise protection standards for erosion control, which can be substantiated by a geotechnical report per Articles V and IX, Chapter 18.22 JCC and/or an engineered stormwater plan when required per JCC 18.30.070 (a) stand-alone engineered stormwater plan is acceptable if the preparer meets the qualifications in JCC 18.10.070as a geotechnical professional that is approved by the administrator; (iii) Stormwater improvements would not compromise protection standards for critical areas that occur within shoreline jurisdiction, which can be substantiated by a special report (including Critical Area Stewardship Plans) adhering to Articles VIII or IX, Chapter 18.22 JCC and is approved by the administrator; (iv) Any stormwater improvement constructed as part of this buffer exception would not be allowed to develop closer to or within a critical area buffer specified by a geotechnical report or the shoreline buffer that the development is approved by SPAAD permitting. (v) As appropriate, such statements of exemption shall contain conditions and/or mitigating performance measures per JCC 18.25.270 to achieve consistency and compliance with the provisions of this program and Act; and (vi) A consistency review is conducted regarding the critical area buffer exemption per JCC 18.22230(4)(g) and (2). Commented [LG59]: Code Interpretation #1 Commented [LG60]: Code Interpretation #2 Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 78/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. 18.25.280 Historic, archaeological, cultural, scientific and educational resources. (1) Policies. (a) Historic, archaeological, cultural, scientific and educational (HACSE) sites and resources should be protected, preserved, and where possible, restored. All use and development on sites containing HACSE resources should be planned and carried out so as to prevent adverse impacts to the resource(s). (b) To prevent adverse impacts on HACSE resources, proponents of all new shoreline use and development should consult the county department of community development prior to beginning any project or activity. (c) Tribal, federal, state, educational institutions and local governments should cooperate to maintain an inventory of all known significant local HACSE sites and resources. (d) The location of historic, cultural and/or archaeological sites/resources should not be disclosed to the general public, consistent with applicable state and federal laws. (e) When HACSE sites/resources occur on public lands they should be accessible to the public and used for research or educational purposes consistent with the public access provisions of this program and applicable tribal access policies. Private owners of HACSE sites/resources are encouraged to provide access and educational opportunities when appropriate. (f) If development is proposed adjacent to an identified HACSE site/resource, then the proposed development should be designed and operated so as to be compatible with continued protection of the site/resource. (2) Regulations – General Regulations. (a) Proponents of new shoreline use and development, including preferred uses and uses exempt from permit requirements, shall: (i) Preserve and protect historic, archaeological and cultural resources that are recorded by the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and resources that are inadvertently discovered during use or development activities; and (ii) Consult the county department of community development, the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, affected tribes, and/or other appropriate agencies prior to beginning development so there is ample time to assess the site and make arrangements to preserve historical, cultural and archaeological resources; and (iii) Comply with all state and federal regulations pertaining to archaeological sites. (b) All feasible means shall be employed to ensure that data, structures, and sites having historical, archaeological, cultural, scientific, or educational significance are preserved, extracted, or used in a manner commensurate with their importance. (c) Excavations for archaeological investigations or data recovery may be permitted subject to the provisions of this program. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 79/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (d) The county shall prohibit any use or development that poses a threat to a HACSE resource. Alternatively the county shall require the development to be postponed to allow for: (i) Coordination with potentially affected tribes and/or the State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation; and/or (ii) Investigation of public acquisition potential; and/or (iii) Retrieval and preservation of significant artifacts. (3) Regulations – Procedural Requirements. (a) When the county receives a permit application or request for a statement of exemption for development on a property within 500 feet of a known or probable historic, archaeological, or cultural site, the county shall: (i) Notify and inform affected tribes and agencies such as the State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation of the proposed activity including timing, location, scope, and resources affected; and (ii) Require the applicant to provide a cultural resource site assessment prior to development unless the administrator determines that the proposed development activities do not include any ground disturbing activities and will not impact a known HACSE site/resource. (b) If a cultural resource site assessment identifies the presence of significant historic or archaeological resources, a cultural resource management plan (CRMP) shall be required. The plan shall include: (i) An analysis of actions to be taken by the property owner, developer, archaeologist, or historic preservation professional, in the event that an inadvertent discovery of historic, archaeological, or cultural sites or artifacts occurs during site development; and (ii) An explanation of why the proposed activity requires a location on, or access across and/or through, a significant historic or archaeological resource; and (iii) A description of the historic/archaeological resources affected by the proposal; and (iv) An assessment of the historic/archaeological resource and an analysis of the potential adverse impacts as a result of the activity; and (v) Recommended measures to prevent adverse impacts; and (vi) Comments from the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, and affected tribes. (c) Site assessments and CRMPs required by this section shall be prepared by a professional archaeologist or historic preservation professional, as applicable. The landowner or project proponent shall be responsible for any professional service fees. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 80/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (d) The administrator may reject or request revision of the conclusions reached in a CRMP when she/he can demonstrate that the assessment is inaccurate or does not fully address the management concerns involved. (e) Where public access is provided to any private or publicly owned building or structure of historic, archaeological or cultural significance, a public access management plan shall be developed in consultation with the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, affected tribes and/or other agencies, to address the following: (i) The type and/or level of public access that is consistent with the long-term protection of both historic resource values and shoreline ecological functions and processes; and (ii) Types and location of interpretative signs, displays and other educational materials; and (iii) Site- and resource-specific conditions, including hours of operation, interpretive and/or directional signage, lighting, pedestrian access, and/or traffic and parking. (f) If any phenomena of possible historic, archaeological and/or cultural interest are inadvertently discovered during any new shoreline use or development, the proponent shall immediately stop work and comply with all of the following: (i) Notify the county department of community development, Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, affected tribes, and other appropriate agencies; (ii) Prepare a site assessment pursuant to this section to determine the significance of the discovery and the extent of damage to the resource; (iii) Distribute the site assessment to the Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation and affected tribes for a 30-day review to determine the significance of the discovery; (iv) Maintain the work stoppage until the county determines that the site is considered significant by the above listed agencies or governments, or if the above listed agencies or governments have failed to respond within the applicable review period following receipt of the site assessment; and (v) Prepare a CRMP pursuant to this section if the county determines that the site is significant. (g) Upon inadvertent discovery of human remains, the county sheriff, coroner, and State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) must be immediately notified. (h) In the event that unforeseen factors constituting an emergency as defined in RCW 90.58.030 necessitate rapid action to retrieve or preserve historic, archaeological and/or cultural resources, the project may be exempted from the requirement to obtain a permit. The county shall notify the State Department of Ecology, the State Attorney General’s Office, potentially affected tribes, and the State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation of such a waiver within 30 days of such action. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VI § 2)] Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 81/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. 18.25.290 Public access. (1) Policies. (a) Providing public access to public shorelines is a primary goal of the Shoreline Management Act. Jefferson County actively supports public and private efforts making better use of existing facilities/opportunities. Strategic efforts to find and fund new shoreline public access are encouraged to meet increasing demands by a growing populace. Increasing all types of public access is a priority for the county. (b) The county should prepare a comprehensive shoreline public access plan in cooperation with appropriate local, state, tribal and nongovernmental agencies/organizations, and the general public. (c) The county should work with appropriate agencies and individuals to acquire lands that can provide physical access to public waters for public use. (d) Shoreline development by public entities, such as local governments, port districts, state agencies, and public utility districts, should provide public access as part of each development project, unless such access is shown to be incompatible with this program due to reasons of safety, security, or adverse impacts to shoreline functions and processes. (e) Shoreline development by private entities should provide public access when the development would either generate a demand for one or more forms of such access, and/or would impair existing legal access opportunities or rights. (f) Single-family residential developments with four or fewer lots/units should not be required to provide public access. (g) Public health and safety concerns associated with public access sites should be adequately mitigated and appropriate precautions taken to prevent adverse impacts on shoreline ecological functions and/or processes. (h) Efforts to implement the public access provisions of this section should be consistent with all relevant constitutional and other legal limitations on regulation of private property. (i) Public access requirements on privately owned lands should be commensurate with the scale and character of the development and should be reasonable, effective and fair to all affected parties including but not limited to the landowner and the public. (j) Where feasible, providers of shoreline public access should: (i) Locate and design public access improvements in a manner that is compatible with the natural shoreline character and avoids adverse impacts to shoreline ecological functions and processes; and (ii) Ensure public access improvements and amenities are safe, respect individual privacy, and avoid or minimize visual impacts from neighboring properties; and (iii) Provide maps and orientation information to inform the public of the presence and location of privately held tidelands, especially those adjacent to public access and recreational areas; and Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 82/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (iv) Incorporate programs, signage and informational kiosks into public access locations, where appropriate, to enhance public education and appreciation of shoreline ecology and areas of historical or cultural significance. (2) Regulations. (a) Single-family residential developments consisting of four or fewer residential lots or dwelling units shall not be required to provide public access. (b) Opportunities to provide visual and/or physical public access shall be considered during the review and conditioning of all proposed commercial and industrial shoreline developments and residential developments involving more than four residential lots or dwelling units. (c) Physical public access shall be incorporated into all development proposals on public lands, all public and private commercial and industrial uses/developments, and all residential subdivisions of greater than four lots unless the project proponent demonstrates that any of the following conditions exist: (i) Unavoidable public health or safety hazards exist and cannot be prevented through reasonable means; or (ii) The use/development has inherent security or cultural sensitivity requirements that cannot be mitigated though reasonable design measures or other solutions; or (iii) The cost of providing the access, easement or an alternative amenity is disproportionate to the total long-term cost of the proposed development; or (iv) The public access will cause unacceptable environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated; or (v) The access would create significant, undue, and unavoidable conflicts with adjacent uses that cannot be mitigated. (d) To be exempt from the public access requirements in subsection (2)(c) of this section, the project proponent must demonstrate that all feasible alternatives have been considered, including, but not necessarily limited to: (i) Regulating access through means such as maintaining a gate and/or limiting hours of use; and (ii) Separating uses and activities (e.g., fences, terracing, use of one-way glazing, hedges, landscaping, etc.). (e) When physical public access is deemed to be infeasible based on considerations listed in subsection (2)(c) of this section, the proponent shall provide visual access to the shore or provide physical access at an off-site location geographically separated from the proposed use/developmental (e.g., a street end, vista, or trail system). Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 83/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (f) Public access shall be located and designed to be compatible with the natural shoreline character, to avoid adverse impacts to shoreline ecological functions and processes, and to ensure public safety. (g) When otherwise consistent with this program, public access structures shall be exempt from the shoreline buffer requirements of this program, meaning that such structures shall be allowed to encroach into the shoreline buffer when necessary to provide physical and/or visual access to the water’s edge. (h) Public shoreline access provided by public road ends, public road rights-of-way, public utilities and rights-of-way shall not be diminished by the county, neighboring property owners, or other citizens, unless the property is zoned for industrial uses in accordance with RCW 36.87.130. (i) Public access sites shall be directly connected to the nearest public street and shall include improvements that conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) when feasible and appropriate. (j) Opportunities for boat-in public access and access to primitive shorelines not accessible by automobile shall be provided where feasible and appropriate. (k) When required for public land, commercial, port or industrial use/development as per subsections (2)(b) and (c) of this section, public access sites shall be fully developed and available for public use prior to final occupancy of such use or development. (l) Public access easements and permit conditions shall be recorded on the deed of title and/or the face of a short or long plat as a condition running, at a minimum, for a period contemporaneous with the duration of the authorized land use. Recordation shall occur at the time of final plat approval or prior to final occupancy. (m) The location of new public access sites shall be clearly identified. Signs with the appropriate agency’s logo shall be constructed, installed and maintained by the project proponent in conspicuous locations at public access sites and/or along common routes to public access sites. The signs shall indicate the public’s right of access, the hours of access, and other information as needed to control or limit access according to conditions of approval. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VI § 3)] 18.25.300 Shoreline setbacks and height. (1) Policies. (a) Standards for density, setbacks, height, and other provisions should ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions and/or processes and preserve the existing character of the shoreline consistent with the purpose of the applicable shoreline environment designation. (b) Proponents of a development on no-bank or low bank marine shorelines are encouraged to locate the bottom of a structure’s foundation higher than the level of expected future sea-level rise. (2) Regulations. (a) A building setback of 10 feet shall be established on the landward edge of the shoreline buffers required by this program. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 84/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (b) Sideyard setbacks shall be measured from all property lines that intersect the shoreline side of a lot or tract. Five feet of the total required sideyard setbacks may be provided on one side and the balance on the other side.Sideyards shall be consistent in depth with underlying zoning requirements. (c) Pursuant to RCW 90.58.320, no permit may be issued for any new or expanded building or structure more than 35 feet above average grade level when such a height will obstruct the view of a substantial number of residences on or adjoining such shorelines. Height is measured according to the definition in Article II of this chapter. The project proponent shall be responsible for providing sufficient information to the administrator to determine that such development will not obstruct views as described. (d) Applicants for heights greater than 35 feet may seek a Shoreline Variance in order to address sea level rise when:1 (i) the applicant has demonstrated that it is infeasible to otherwise retreat, accommodate, or protect the structure; (ii) the added height is no greater than that necessary to accommodate the projected sea level rise as determined by a qualified professional to the satisfaction of the Shoreline Administrator; and (iii) the added height will not obstruct the view of a substantial number of residences on areas adjoining such shorelines. The County may require a visual impact analysis of views from various locations to determine if the shoreline view for adjacent properties will be significantly obstructed as part of a development proposal; and (iv) overriding consideration of the public interest will be served. (d) Power poles and transmission towers associated with allowed uses and developments are not subject to height limits but shall not be higher than necessary to achieve the intended purpose. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VI § 4)] 18.25.310 Vegetation conservation. (1) Policies. (a) Maintaining native shoreline vegetation is an important goal of this program. The policies and regulations of this section are intended to ensure well-vegetated, stable shorelines that provide habitat and other ecological benefits and resemble natural, unaltered shorelines. 1 Add similar edit to zoning code: 18.30.050 Table 6-1. Density, Dimension and Open Space Standards Building Height7,8, 20 (feet) 20. An applicant may request an increase in height above 35 feet as a Type III decision considering variance permit criteria in order to address sea level rise in shoreline jurisdiction per JCC 18.25.300. Commented [LG61]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 85/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (b) New uses and/or developments should be designed to preserve native shoreline vegetation to maintain shoreline ecological functions and processes and prevent direct, indirect and/or cumulative impacts of shoreline development. (c) New uses and/or developments should establish native shoreline vegetation such that the composition, structure, and density of the plant community resemble a natural, unaltered shoreline as much as possible. (d) Maintaining well-vegetated shorelines is preferred over clearing vegetation to create views or provide lawns. Limited and selective clearing for views and lawns may be allowed when slope stability and ecological functions are not compromised, but landowners should not assume that an unobstructed view of the water is guaranteed. Trimming and pruning are generally preferred over removal of native vegetation. Property owners are strongly encouraged to avoid or minimize the use of fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides. (e) Shoreline landowners are encouraged to preserve and enhance native woody vegetation and native groundcovers to stabilize soils and provide habitat. Maintaining native plant communities is preferred over nonnative ornamental plantings because native plants have greater ecological value. Nonnative vegetation that requires use of fertilizers, herbicides and/or pesticides is discouraged. (f) Prior to granting a shoreline permit or determining that a proposed use/development is exempt from permitting, the county should evaluate site plans to determine the extent to which the vegetation is conserved. As needed, the county may require special reports regarding vegetation and shall condition approval of new developments to ensure the following: (i) Native plant communities on marine, river, and lake shorelines are preserved; and (ii) Overhanging trees along shorelines are kept intact to provide shading and other ecological functions; and (iii) Established areas of native plants are preserved to maintain slope stability and prevent surface erosion; and (iv) Structures and associated development are placed in areas that avoid disturbance of established native plants, especially trees and shrubs; and (v) Clearing and grading near bluff edges and other erosion- or landslide-prone areas are minimized to prevent slope instability; and (vi) Shoreline development proposals should incorporate provisions for removing invasive or nonnative species and planting native species when doing so would improve ecological functions and processes. (2) Regulations. (a) Unless otherwise specified, all shoreline use and development, including preferred uses and uses exempt from permit requirements, shall comply with the buffer provisions of this program and Chapter 18.22 JCC to protect and maintain shoreline vegetation. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 86/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (b) Proponents of all new shoreline uses or developments shall demonstrate that site designs and layouts are consistent with the policies of this section to ensure shoreline functions, values, and processes are maintained and preserved. A shoreline permit or written statement of exemption shall not mandate, nor guarantee, unobstructed horizontal or lateral visibility of the water, shoreline or any specific feature near or far. (c) View Maintenance. Proponents of all new shoreline uses or developments shall use all feasible techniques to maximize retention of existing native shoreline vegetation while allowing for shoreline views. (i) Vegetation Trimming. Techniques shall include selective pruning, windowing and other measures that preserve native plant composition and structure. No more than 25 percent of a single tree’s leaf bearing crown may be removed and no more than 25 percent of the canopy cover of any stand of trees may be removed for view preservation. If additional trimming is requested in subsequent years, the cumulative removal may not exceed 25 percent. Limbing or crown thinning shall comply with Tree Care Industry Association pruning standards, unless the tree is a hazard tree as defined by this program. Tree topping is prohibited when main stem/trunk is over three inches diameter at breast height (DBH). (ii) Vegetation Removal. All vegetation removal within the buffer area must comply with JCC 18.25.270(4)(h). In no instance shall vegetation removal exceed 20 percent of the required buffer area or 15 linear feet of the water frontage, whichever is greater. Outside the buffer, vegetation removal shall be the minimum necessary for maintaining shoreline views from the primary structure and to provide lawns or ground cover, ,and must comply with other applicable requirements such as clearing and grading, forest practices, and protection standards for fish and wildlife habitat. (iii) The administrator may deny a request or condition approval of vegetation management proposals for view maintenance if it is determined the action will result in an adverse effect to any of the following: (A) Slope stability; (B) Habitat value; (C) Health of surrounding vegetation; (D) Risk of wind damage to surrounding vegetation; (E) Nearby surface or ground water; or (F) Water quality of a nearby water body. (d) Proponents of all new shoreline uses or developments shall maintainretain existing native shoreline vegetation to the maximum extent practicable, except that the following activities shall be exempt from this requirement: Commented [LG62]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Commented [LG63]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Commented [LG64]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations This phrase seems out of place in this View Maintenance sub-section. Commented [LG65]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 87/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (i) Existing and ongoing agricultural activities on agricultural lands enrolled in the open space tax program for agriculture or on lands designated as agricultural lands of long-term commercial significance on the official map of Comprehensive Plan land use designations; (ii) Buffer enhancement by removal of noxious weeds, based on consultation with the Jefferson County noxious weed board, and/or planting native vegetation; (iii) MaintenanceNormal maintenance of existing residential landscaping, such as lawns and gardens, pursuant to Section 18.25.560 of this Program and JCC 18.22.230(4)(m);) . Expansion of landscaping into a buffer area or other area of existing native vegetation is not normal maintenance; (iv) Maintenance trimming of the limbs or branches on a tree or shrub that has a main stem less than three inches in diameter at breast height (DBH);) for purposes other than view maintenance; (v) Construction of pervious surface trails for nonmotorized use, provided the trail is no wider than five feet and the vegetation trimming is limited to five feet on either side of the trail except where an arborist report indicates that additional vegetation trimming or removal is required for safety reasons; (vi) Harvest of wild crops that does not significantly affect the viability of the wild crop, or adversely affect shoreline functions of the area; (vii) Removal of a hazard tree, as defined in Article II of this chapter, where trimming is not sufficient to address the hazard. In such cases, the downed tree shall be retained on site to provide wildlife habitat and enhance in-stream or marine habitat if present. The location of retained materials placed on site shall reflect firewise program guidance for defensible space and fire safety. Where not immediately apparent to the administrator, the hazard tree determination shall be made after review of a report prepared by an arborist or forester. (e) The county may impose conditions on new shoreline use and/or development as needed to prevent the introduction and spread of aquatic weeds. Aquatic weed removal and disposal shall occur in a manner that minimizes and mitigates adverse impacts to native plant communities and shoreline ecological functions. (f) When restoring or enhancing shoreline vegetation, proponents shall use native species approved by the county that are of a similar diversity, density, and type to that occurring in the general vicinity of the site prior to any shoreline alteration. The vegetation shall be nurtured and maintained to ensure establishment of a healthy and sustainable native plant community over time. (g) The vegetation conservation regulations of this program do not apply to commercial forest practices as defined by Article II of this chapter when such activities are covered under the Washington State Forest Practices Act (Chapter 76.09 RCW). Where such activities are associated with a conversion of forest lands to other uses or other forest practice activities, the vegetation conservation requirements shall apply. Commented [LG66]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 88/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (h) Vegetation conservation standards shall not apply retroactively to existing uses and developments, although property owners are strongly encouraged to voluntarily improve shoreline vegetation conditions over the long term. (i) Vegetative debris shall be properly managed by mulching/leaving in place as habitat and soil amendment, composting on-site, or removing and disposing of off-site. The dumping of vegetative debris, including grass clippings and yard waste, in shoreline areas is strongly discouraged, especially when slope stability and water quality would be threatened. (j) Vegetative debris in the buffer that creates a fire hazard to existing structures may be reduced by chipping if the chipped material is returned to the original location. Fallen tree trunks may not be removed or chipped. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VI § 5)] 18.25.320 Water quality and quantity. (1) Policies. (a) The location, construction, operation, and maintenance of all shoreline uses and developments should maintain or enhance the quantity and quality of surface and ground water over the long term. (b) Shoreline use and development should minimize, through effective education, site planning and maintenance, the need for chemical fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides or other similar chemical treatments that could contaminate surface or ground water or cause adverse effects on shoreline ecological functions and values. (c) Appropriate buffers along all wetlands, streams, lakes, and marine water bodies should be provided and maintained in a manner that avoids the need for chemical treatment. (d) Potential adverse effects of agricultural activities on water quality should be minimized by implementing best management practices, buffers and other appropriate measures. (e) Effective erosion control and water-runoff treatment methods should be provided for all shoreline development and use in accordance with JCC 18.30.070. (f) Encourage pervious materials and other appropriate low impact development techniques where soils and geologic conditions are suitable and where such practices could reduce stormwater runoff. (2) Regulations. (a) All shoreline uses and activities shall use effective erosion control methods during both project construction and operation. At a minimum, effective erosion control methods shall require compliance with the current edition of the Department of Ecology’s Stormwater Management Manual, NPDES General Permit requirements, and the stormwater management provisions of JCC 18.30.070. (b) To avoid water quality degradation by malfunctioning or failing septic systems located within shoreline jurisdiction, on-site sewage systems shall be located and designed to meet all applicable water quality, utility, and health standards. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 89/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (c) All materials that may come in contact with water shall be composed of nontoxic materials, such as wood, concrete, approved plastic composites or steel, that will not adversely affect water quality or aquatic plants or animals. Materials used for decking or other structural components shall be approved by applicable state agencies for contact with water to avoid discharge of pollutants from wave splash, rain, or runoff. Wood treated with creosote, copper chromium arsenate or pentachlorophenol is prohibited in shoreline water bodies. (d) Solid and liquid wastes and untreated effluents shall not be allowed to enter any ground water or surface water or to be discharged onto land. The release of oil, chemicals, genetically modified organisms or hazardous materials onto land or into the water is prohibited. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VI § 6)] Article VII. Shoreline Modifications Policies and Regulations 18.25.330 Applicability – Purpose. The policies and regulations in this article apply to all types of shoreline modification, with specific standards defined for each shoreline environment. They are not listed in order of priority. These policies and regulations: (1) Help to implement the master program goals in Article III of this chapter; and (2) Are informed by the guiding principles in Article I of this chapter; and (3) Work in concert with all the other policies and regulations contained in this program; and (4) Are based on the state shoreline guidelines (Chapter 173-26 WAC). [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VII)] 18.25.340 Beach access structures. (1) Policies. (a) Beach access structures, as defined in Article II of this chapter, should be located, designed and maintained in a manner that minimizes adverse effects on shoreline ecology. (b) Jefferson County recognizes a balance has to be found between enabling pedestrian access to beach areas and protecting fragile shoreline ecosystems. (c) Neighboring property owners are encouraged to combine resources to collectively propose beach access structures in appropriate locations for shared use. (d) Beach access structures should not be permitted until and unless their adverse effects on stream, lake or marine shoreline functions and processes, including any significant adverse effects on adjoining lands and properties, are fully evaluated and mitigated. All proposals for structures that link upland areas with adjacent beaches shall be carefully evaluated by the criteria and regulations in this section. (e) Beach access structures may not be appropriate in some areas because of safety hazards or sensitive ecological conditions. The county should not permit these structures in areas where there are expected risks to human health and safety or adverse effects on shoreline functions and processes. Some properties will have view-only access to the neighboring waters. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 90/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (f) Beach access structures should conform to the existing topography, minimize adverse impacts on shoreline aesthetics, and minimize clearing and grading to the maximum extent feasible. (g) Beach access structures should not be allowed if there is a reasonable likelihood that they will require erosion control structures or armoring in the future. (h) Beach access structures should be designed to minimize the amount of clearing, grading, excavation, and other forms of shoreline alteration so that they don’t require substantial bank or slope modifications. (i) Beach access structures should only be allowed where it provides access to a publicly owned beach or where the same party owns both the uplands and adjoining tidelands or an easement is granted by the tideland owner to the upland owner for access. (2) Uses and Activities Prohibited Outright. Beach access structures shall be prohibited from marine feeder bluffs in all environment designations. (.(3) Shoreline Environment Regulations. (a) Priority Aquatic. Public beach access structures may be permitted as a conditional use, provided they are associated with a water-dependent use that includes public access to the shoreline, and provided they are consistent with policies and regulations of this program and are allowed in the adjoining upland designation. Private beach access structures accessory to single-family residential development shall be prohibited. (b) Aquatic. Public beach access structures may be permitted as a conditional use, provided they are associated with a water-dependentoriented use that includes public access to the shoreline, and provided they are consistent with policies and regulations of this program in the adjoining upland designation. Private beach access structures accessory to single-family residential development may be permitted as a conditional use when they are allowed in the adjoining upland designation. (c) Natural. Public beach access structures may be permitted as a conditional use, provided they are associated with a water-dependentoriented use that includes public access to the shoreline, and provided they are consistent with policies and regulations of this program. Private beach access structures accessory to single-family residential development shall be prohibited. (d) Conservancy. Public and privatebeach access structures may be permitted, provided they are associated with a water-oriented use that includes public access to the shoreline. Private beach access structures may be permitted as a conditional use, provided they are consistent with the provisionspolicies and regulations of this program. (e) Shoreline Residential. Public and private beach access structures may be permitted as a conditional use, provided they are consistent with the provisionspolicies and regulations of this program. (f) High Intensity. Public and private beach access structures may be permitted as a conditional use, provided they are consistent with the provisionspolicies and regulations of this program. (4) Regulations. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 91/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (a) Beach access structures may be permitted only when consistent with the provisions of this program. (b) Public beach access structures shall be subject to this section, JCC 18.25.290 (Public access) of this program, and conform to Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards. (c) When permitted, beach access structures shall be located, designed and operated to avoid critical areas and prevent a net loss of shoreline ecological functions or processes, including, but not limited to: (i) Habitat; (ii) Slope stability; (iii) Sediment transport; and (iv) Water quality. (d) The county shall have the authority to require specific design standards based on the configuration of the site including existing topography, vegetation, soils, drainage and other factors. (e) When allowed, beach access structures may be located within the shoreline buffer; provided, that: (i) The clear width of any walkway, staircase, tower or tram shall be at least three feet, and not exceed five feet; and (ii) The structure shall not extend more than 12 vertical feet above the bank or slopetop of the bank or slope, and is located to minimize native vegetation removal and prioritize tree preservation; and (iiiii) There is no other available public beach access within 500 feet of the proposed access site. (f) No portion of a beach access structure shall be constructed waterward of the ordinary high water mark unless there is no other feasible alternative. (g) When in-water or over-water construction is allowed in accordance with this section it shall be limited to a small pier or pile-supported pedestrian landing platform of 25 square feet or less that is otherwise consistent with the provisions of this program. (h) New residential subdivisions of more than four units or lots shall include a restriction on the face of the plat prohibiting individual beach access structures. Shared access structures may be permitted in these subdivisions when consistent with the provisions of this program. (i) Existing lawfully constructed nonconforming beach access structures may be repaired or replaced in kind as a nonconforming use as consistent with other provisions of this program. (j) BeachIn addition to the prohibition stated in subsection (2) of this section, beach access structures shall also be prohibited if any of the following apply: Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 92/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (i) The structure would adverselyadverselyA impact a critical area or marine feeder bluff, or increase landslide or erosion hazards; or (ii) The structure is likely to interfere with natural erosion and accretion processes; or (iiiiiiv) The bank slope where the structure is placed is likely to require shoreline stabilization/structural shoreline defense worksarmoring in the future; or (ivvvi) Substantial bank or slope modification is required. (k) Prior to approving a permit for a beach access structure, the county shall require the project proponent to demonstrate that the project is consistent with this program. Information to be provided by the proponent will include, but not be limited to: (i) Existing conditions at the site related to erosion, slope stability, drainage, vegetation, and coastal processes; and (ii) Probable effects of the access structure on the stability of the site over time; and (iii) Potential effects of the access structure on shoreline processes such as net-shoreline drift, sediment transport, mass wasting, and erosion; and (iv) Methods for maintaining the structure over time that will preclude the need for a bulkhead or other type of stabilization in the future; and (v) Potential effects on fish and wildlife habitats and other shoreline ecological functions; and (vi) Measures needed to ensure/maintain slope stability, maintain coastal processes, and prevent erosion in the long term. (l) The county may require proposals for pedestrian beach access structures to include geotechnical analysis prepared by a licensed professional engineer or geologist and/or biological analysis prepared by a qualified biologist. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VII § 1)] 18.25.350 Boating facilities – Boat launches, docks, piers, floats, lifts, marinas, and mooring buoys. (1) Policies. (a) Boating facilities as defined in Article II of this chapter should be located, designed, constructed and operated with appropriate mitigation to avoid adverse effects on shoreline functions and processes and to prevent conflicts with other allowed uses. (b) Boating facilities should not be located or expanded where they would: (i) Impact critical habitats; or (ii) Substantially interfere with currents and/or net-shoreline drift; or (iii) Cause significant adverse effects on aquatic habitat, biological functions, water quality, aesthetics, navigation, and/or neighboring uses. Commented [LG67]: Task Force B and E Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 93/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (c) Docks and piers should not be allowed where shallow depths require excessive overwater length. (d) The county should protect the natural character of the shoreline and prevent adverse ecological impacts caused by in-water and overwater structures by limiting the number of new docks/piers/floats and by controlling how they are designed and constructed and where they are located. Wood coated or treated with toxic materials should not be allowed. (e) To prevent the impacts associated with private docks, piers, floats, lifts and launch ramps and rails accessory to residential development: (i) Mooring buoys are generally preferred over docks, piers or floats; and (ii) Shared docks/piers/floats serving multiple properties are preferred over single-user docks/piers/floats serving a single property or parcel; and (iii) Public boat launches are preferred over private launch facilities. Rail and track launch systems are preferred over ramps. (f) Boating facilities associated with commercial, industrial, or port uses, residential subdivisions and multifamily housing should include public access and contribute to the public’s ability to view, touch, and travel on the waters of the state in accordance with JCC 18.25.290 (Public access). (g) The county should identify areas that are suitable for development and/or expansion of marinas and public boat launches and prevent them from being developed with non-water-dependent uses having less stringent site requirements. This should be accomplished in a timely manner. (h) Development of new marinas and public boat launch facilities should be coordinated with public access and recreation plans and should be co-located with port or other compatible water- dependent uses where feasible. Affected parties and potential partners should be included in the planning process. (i) When reviewing proposals for new or expanded marinas and public boat launches, the county should seek comment from public recreation providers, adjacent cities/counties, port districts, Washington State Parks, and the Washington State Departments of Ecology, Fish and Wildlife, Health, and Natural Resources, and area tribes to ensure that local as well as regional recreation needs are addressed. (j) The county should support the use of innovative and effective methods for protecting, enhancing, and restoring shoreline ecological functions and processes during the design, development and operation of new or expanded boating facilities. Such methods may include public facility and resource planning, education, voluntary protection and enhancement projects, and incentive programs. (2) Shoreline Environment Regulations. (a) Priority Aquatic. (i) Boat Launches – Nonresidential. Only public and private launches serving water-dependent commercial, industrial, port or other primary uses may be permitted if the primary use is Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 94/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. permitted in the adjacent upland shoreline environment subject to the provisions of this program. (ii) Docks, Piers, Floats and Lifts – Nonresidential. Only public and private docks, piers, floats and lifts serving water-dependent commercial, industrial, port or other primary uses are allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program if the primary use is permitted in the adjacent upland shoreline environment. (iii) Boat Launches, Docks, Piers, Floats, and Lifts – Residential. Single-user docks, piers, floats, lifts and boat launches accessory to residential or private recreational development are prohibited. Shared boating facilities accessory to residential or private recreational development may be permitted. (iv) Marinas are prohibited. (v) Moorage used for float planes is prohibited. (vi) Mooring buoys are allowed subject to the adjacent upland shoreline designation and the policies and regulations of this program. (b) Aquatic. (i) Public and private boat launches are allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program if allowed in the adjacent upland shoreline environment. (ii) Public and private docks, piers, floats, and lifts are allowed if allowed in the adjacent upland shoreline environment. (iii) Marinas are allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program if allowed in the adjacent upland shoreline environment. (iv) Moorage used for float planes may be allowed with a conditional use permit if permitted in the adjacent upland designation. (v) Mooring buoys are allowed subject to the adjacent upland shoreline designation and the policies and regulations of this program. (c) Natural. (i) Boat launches for hand launching of small watercraft (such as kayaks, small sailboats, and other nonmotorized watercraft) may be allowed with a conditional use permit, subject to policies and regulations of this program, if materials and design are compatible with the site. (ii) A public dock, pier or float for recreational use may be allowed with a conditional use permit. (iii) Mooring buoys that are accessory to water-dependent uses such as aquaculture may be allowed with a conditional use permit (C(a)). Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 95/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (iv) All other boating facilities, including boating facilities accessory to residential development, are prohibited. (d) Conservancy. (i) BoatResidential boat launches may be allowed with a conditional use permit subject to policies and regulations of this program. (ii(ii) Non-residential boat launches are allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program. (iii) Docks, piers, floats and lifts may be allowed with a conditional use permit subject to policies and regulations of this program, except industrial piers are prohibited. (iiiiv) Marinas may be permitted as a conditional use. (ivv) Moorage used for float planes may be permitted as a conditional use. (vvi) Mooring buoys are allowed with a conditional use permit (C(a)) subject to policies and regulations of this program. (e) Shoreline Residential. (i) Boat launches are allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program. (ii) Docks, piers, floats and lifts are allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program, except industrial piers are prohibited. (iii) Marinas may be permitted as a conditional use. (iv) Moorage used for float planes may be permitted as a conditional use. (v) Mooring buoys are allowed with a conditional use permit (C(a)) subject to policies and regulations of this program. (f) High Intensity. All boating facilities are allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program. (3) Regulations – Boat Launches – Public. (a) Public boatBoat launches may be permitted when they are located, designed and constructed in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on coastal or fluvial processes, biological functions, aquatic and riparian habitats, water quality, navigation, and/or neighboring uses. Rail and track systems shall be preferred over concrete ramps or similar facilities. (b) When permitted, public boat launches shall be: (i) Located in areas where there is adequate water mixing and flushing action; (ii) Designed so as not to retard or reduce natural shoreline flushing characteristics; Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 96/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (iii) Designed and constructed using methods/technology that have been recognized and approved by state and federal resource agencies as the best currently available;. To the existent feasible, boat launches in marine waters shall follow the design and construction standards in WAC 220-660-390(3 and 4) and in fresh waters shall follow the design and construction standards in WAC 220-660-150(3 and 4); (iv) Designed so that existing or potential public access along beaches is not blocked or made unsafe, and so that public use of the surface waters is not unduly impaired; and (v) Developed and maintained to support waterfront access for watercraft. In those limited instances where separate or associated uses are permitted, other than restrooms and/or sewer/septic facilities, only uses that are water-dependent and/or afford public access uses shall be approved. (c) Public boatBoat launches on river shores shall be located downstream of accretion shoreforms, or on stable banks where no or minimal current deflections will be necessary. (d) PublicNonresidential boat launches shall provide adequate restroom and sewage and solid waste disposal facilities in compliance with applicable health regulations. (e) When overwater development is proposed in association with a publicnonresidential boat launch facility, it may be permitted only where such use requires direct water access, and/or where such facilities will significantly increase public opportunities for water access. (f) Public boatBoat launches shall be located and designed to prevent traffic hazards and minimize traffic impacts on nearby access streets. (g) PublicNonresidential boat launch sites shall include parking spaces for boat trailers commensurate with projected demand and shall comply with the transportation provisions of this program. (4) Regulations – Boat Launches (Ramps and Rails) – Private. (a) Privateh) Residential boat launches shall be allowed only when publicpublicly accessible nonresidential boat launches are unavailable within a reasonable distance. (b) When permitted, private boat launches including launches accessory to residential development shall be designed and constructed using methods/technology that have been recognized and approved by state and federal resource agencies as the best currently available. Rail and track systems shall be preferred over concrete ramps or similar facilities. (c(i) No more than one private boat launch facility or structure shall be permitted on a single parcel or residential lot. (54) Regulations – Docks, Piers and Floats – Nonresidential. (a) Docks, piers and floats, as defined in Article II of this chapter, associated with commercial, industrial, port or public recreational developments should only be allowed when ecological impacts are mitigated in accordance with this program, and: Commented [AS68]: Language added in response to WDFW comment provided in letter dated 11/23/2020. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 97/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (i) The dock/pier/float is required to accommodate a water-dependent use; and/or (ii) The dock/pier/float provides opportunities for the public to access the shoreline. (b) New commercial, industrial, port or public recreational docks, piers and floats shall be designed and constructed to avoid or, if that is not possible, to minimize the impacts to nearshore habitats and processes. (c) The length, width and height of nonresidential docks, piers and floats shall be no greater than that required for safety and practicality for the primary use. (d) New and substantially expanded nonresidential docks, piers and floats shall be constructed of materials that will not adversely affect water quality or aquatic plants and animals over the long term. Materials for any portions of the dock, pier, float, framing, or decking that come in contact with water shall be approved by applicable state agencies for use in water. For example, wood treated with creosote, pentachlorophenol or other similarly toxic materials is not allowed. (e) To minimize adverse effects on nearshore habitats and species caused by overwater structures that reduce ambient light levels, the following shall apply: (i) The width of docks, piers and floats shall be the minimum necessary. Materials that will allow light to pass through the deck may be required where width exceeds four feet; and (ii) Grating to allow light passage or reflective panels to increase light refraction shall be used on walkways or gangplanks in nearshore areas; and (iii) The maximum structure height above water shall be employed, consistent with safety and usability. (f) Commercial, industrial, port or public recreational docks, piers and floats shall be spaced and oriented to shoreline in a manner that avoids or minimizes: (i) Hazards and obstructions to navigation, fishing, swimming and pleasure boating; and (ii) Shading of beach substrate below; and (iii) Any “wall” effect that would block or baffle wave patterns, currents, littoral drift, or movement of aquatic life forms. A north-south orientation is generally optimal. (g) Fill waterward of OHWM shall be limited to the minimum necessary to match the upland with the elevation of the nonresidential dock or pier when consistent with JCC 18.25.370 (Filling and excavation). (h) Dredging shall be limited to the minimum necessary to allow boat access to a nonresidential dock or pier when consistent with JCC 18.25.360 (Dredging). (i) Covered moorage associated with nonresidential docks, piers, and floats shall be prohibited. (65) Regulations – Docks, Piers, Floats and Lifts – Accessory to Residential Development. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 98/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (a) Docks, piers, floats and lifts accessory to residential development/use shall only be allowed when: (i) Ecological impacts are mitigated in accordance with this program; and (ii) The moorage platform is designed for access to private watercraft; and (iii) The cumulative effects of dock, pier, float and lift proliferation have been identified and shown to be negligible. (b) If allowed under this program, no more than one dock/pier and one float and one boat/ski lift may be permitted on a single lot owned for residential use or private recreational use. (c) In-water fixed platform structures supported by piles that do not abut the shoreline shall be prohibited. (d) If permitted, new docks, piers, floats, lifts accessory to residential development/use shall be: (i) Designed and constructed to avoid or, if that is not possible, to minimize shading and other impacts on nearshore habitats and processes; and (ii) Constructed of materials that will not adversely affect water quality or aquatic plants and animals over the long term. Materials for portions of the dock, pier, float, framing and decking in contact with water shall be approved by applicable state agencies for use in water. For example, wood treated with creosote, pentachlorophenol or other similarly toxic materials is not allowed; and (iii) Spaced and oriented to shoreline in a manner that minimizes hazards and obstructions to navigation, fishing, swimming, and pleasure boating; and (iv) Designed to avoid the need for maintenance dredging. The moorage of a boat larger than provided for in original moorage design shall not be grounds for approval of dredging; and (v) Spaced and oriented to minimize shading and avoid a “wall” effect that would block or baffle wave patterns, currents, littoral drift, or movement of aquatic life forms. A north-south orientation is generally optimal. (e) The length of docks and piers accessory to residential use/development shall be the minimum demonstrated necessary for safety and practicality for the residential use. The maximum length for residential docks or piers shall be limited to 100 feet as measured horizontally from the ordinary high water mark. The administrator may approve a different dock or pier length when needed to: (i) Avoid known eelgrass beds, forage fish habitats, or other sensitive nearshore resources; or (ii) Accommodate shared use. (f) Floats accessory to residential use shall not exceed 200 square feet in area or three feet in height as measured from the mean lower low water (MLLW). Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 99/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (g) Floats shall only be used where there is sufficient water depth to prevent grounding at low tide. The county may require the use of stoppers or other measures to ensure compliance with this standard. (h) To avoid and minimize adverse effects on nearshore habitats and species caused by overwater structures that reduce ambient light levels, the following shall apply: (i) The width of docks and floats shall be the minimum necessary. Materials that will allow light to pass through the deck may be required where width exceeds four feet; and (ii) Grating to allow light passage or reflective panels to increase light refraction shall be used on walkways or gangplanks in nearshore areas; and (iii) The maximum structure height above water should be employed, consistent with safety and usability. (i) Residential developments with more than four lots or dwelling units may be granted permits for community docks that are shared by at least one other owner. No more than one dock/pier or float may be permitted for each three adjoining waterfront lots, with necessary access easements to be recorded at the time of permitting. (j) Single-user docks, piers and floats for individual residential lots may be permitted in existing subdivisions approved on or before January 28, 1993, only where a shared facility has not already been developed. Prior to development of a new single-user dock/pier/float for a single residential lot, the applicant shall demonstrate that: (i) Existing facilities in the vicinity, including marinas and shared moorage, are not adequate or feasible for use; and (ii) On marine shorelines alternative moorage, such as one or more mooring buoys or a buoy in combination with a small dock sized to accommodate a tender vessel, are not adequate or feasible. (k) Single-user moorage for private/recreational float planes may be permitted as a conditional use where construction of such moorage: (i) Is limited to the smallest size necessary to accommodate the float plane. (ii) Will not adversely affect shoreline functions or processes, including wildlife use. (iii) Includes ecological restoration, in addition to mitigation, to compensate for the greater intensity of use associated with the float plane moorage. (l) Covered moorage associated with single-family residential development shall be prohibited, except that the county may allow a small covered area up to 100 square feet in size, maximum height of 10 feet, and with vertical walls on up to three sides on the overland portion of a dock/pier only. (m) Single-user docks/piers/floats shall be located within side yard setbacks for residential development (both onshore and offshore); provided, that a shared dock/pier may be located Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 100/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. adjacent to or upon a shared side property line upon filing of an agreement by the affected property owners. (n) Fill waterward of OHWM shall be limited to the minimum necessary to match the upland with the elevation of the residential dock or pier when consistent with JCC 18.25.370 (Filling and excavation). (o) Dredging for construction or maintenance of docks, piers and floats accessory to residential use shall be prohibited waterward of OHWM. (p) No single-user or shared dock/pier/float may be constructed to within 200 feet of OHWM on the opposite shoreline of any lake or semi-enclosed body of water such as a bay, cove, or natural channel. (q) Boating facilities shall be marked with reflectors, or otherwise identified to prevent unnecessarily hazardous conditions for water surface users during day or night. Exterior finish shall be generally nonreflective. (r) Boating facilities shall be constructed and maintained so that no part of them creates hazardous conditions nor damages other shoreline property or natural features during flood conditions. (s) No dock, pier, float, or watercraft moored thereto shall be used for a residence. (t) Storage of fuel, oils, and other toxic materials is prohibited on residential docks, piers and floats except in portable containers that have secondary containment. (76) Regulations – Marinas. (a) Marinas may be permitted on marine and river shorelines when they are consistent with this program and when the proponent demonstrates to the county’s satisfaction that all of the following conditions are met: (i) The proposed location is the least environmentally damaging alternative; and (ii) Potential adverse impacts on shoreline processes and ecological functions are mitigated to achieve no net loss; and (iii) The project includes ecological restoration measures to improve baseline conditions over time; and (iv) The area has adequate water circulation and flushing action; and (v) The proposed location will not require dredging or excavation/filling of wetlands; and (vi) Suitable public infrastructure is available or can be made available to support the marina. (b) Marinas shall be prohibited in all of the following locations: (i) Lake shores; and (ii) River point and channel bars or other accretional beaches; and Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 101/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (iii) Areas of active channel migration; and (iv) Where a flood hazard will be created or exacerbated; and (v) Shorelines with a priority aquatic environmental designation; and (vi) River mouths. (c) Where marinas are permitted they shall be designed, constructed and operated according to the following: (i) Open pile or floating breakwater designs shall be used unless the proponent demonstrates that there are specific safety considerations that warrant alternative approaches or unless rip- rap or other solid construction is shown to have fewer impacts on shoreline ecology over the short and long term. (ii) Shoreline armoring shall be limited to the minimum necessary to protect marina infrastructure and shall consist of softshore bio-stabilization unless such stabilization is demonstrated by a geotechnical analysis to be infeasible or inadequate to protect the site. (iii) Floating structures shall be designed to prevent grounding on tidelands. Floats shall only be used where there is sufficient water depth to prevent grounding at low tide. The county may require the use of stoppers or other measures to ensure compliance with this standard. (iv) Piers and other structures shall be located, sized and designed to minimize shading of nearshore aquatic habitats and species. (v) Solid structures shall be designed to provide fish passage through and along the shallow water fringe. (vi) Floating piers shall be required in rivers unless the proponent can demonstrate that fixed piers will cause substantially less impact on geo-hydraulic processes. (vii) Marinas shall be sited to prevent restrictions in the use of commercial and recreational shellfish beds and in compliance with Washington Department of Health guidelines and National Shellfish Sanitation Program (NSSP) standards. (viii) Marina development shall generally be required to include public access amenities. Consistent with JCC 18.25.290 (Public access), public access siting and design shall be determined based on what is appropriate to a given location and the needs/desires of the surrounding community. Public access shall be designed to be environmentally sound, aesthetically compatible with adjacent uses, and safe for users. (ix) Live-aboard vessels may occupy up to 20 percent of the slips at a marina. Marinas that accommodate live-aboards shall provide and maintain adequate facilities and programs to address waste disposal and sanitary disposal. (x) New or expanded marina development may include fill waterward of the ordinary high water mark only when necessary for the water-dependent portions of the marina facility. Such Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 102/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. fill activities shall conform to JCC 18.25.370 (Filling and excavation) and this section. Filling solely for the creation of marina parking areas shall be prohibited. (xi) If new or expanded marina facilities adversely affect net shoreline drift or other coastal processes to the detriment of nearby beaches or habitats, the county may require the marina operator to replenish the substrate in these areas periodically or take other measures to offset adverse impacts. (d) New or expanded development appurtenant to marinas shall be designed and constructed to avoid and, where avoidance is not possible, minimize impacts on shoreline functions and processes. Facilities shall be clustered and located in the least environmentally damaging portion of the site to reduce clearing and grading impacts. (e) To meet the regulations in subsection (76)(d) of this section, the following standards shall apply to new or expanded development appurtenant to marinas: (i) Accessory uses at marinas shall be limited to water-oriented uses and uses that provide physical or visual shoreline access for substantial numbers of the general public. Accessory development includes, but is not limited to, parking, open air storage, waste storage and treatment, stormwater management facilities, utility and upland transportation development. (ii) Water-oriented accessory uses reasonably related to marina operation may be located over water or near the water’s edge by conditional use permit if an overwater or water’s-edge location is essential to the operation of the use and if opportunities are provided for substantial numbers of people to access the shoreline. (iii) Parking shall be located away from the water’s edge and landward of shoreline buffers prescribed by this program unless no feasible alternative location exists. (iv) Parking areas shall meet county stormwater management standards and shall, where feasible, incorporate low impact development practices such as pervious surfaces and bioswales. (v) Dry moorage and other storage areas shall be landscaped with native vegetation to provide a visual and noise buffer for adjoining uses. (vi) Pump-out, holding, and/or waste treatment facilities and services shall be provided at all marinas. Pump-out facilities shall be conveniently located and sited to ensure easy access, prevent lengthy queues and allow full compliance with waste disposal regulations. Vessel- mounted pump-out services and hard-plumbed stations at each slip shall be preferred over portable pump-out equipment. (vii) Marinas shall provide adequate restroom and sewage disposal facilities in compliance with applicable health regulations. Restrooms shall be available 24 hours a day for use by any patron of the marina facility; the need for restrooms shall be determined based on the number of slips and percentage of live-aboard vessels within the marina. (viii) Garbage and recycling receptacles shall be provided and maintained by the marina operator at several locations convenient to users. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 103/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (ix) Marina operators shall post all regulations pertaining to handling and disposal of waste, sewage, fuel, and oil or toxic materials where all users may easily read them. (x) Boat washing facilities shall be provided to minimize transfer of invasive aquatic species between water bodies. (f) When reviewing proposals for new or expanded marina facilities, the county shall require the proponent to prepare and implement appropriate technical studies and plans that are not already required via another regulatory review process. Examples of studies and plans that may be required include, but are not limited to: (i) A maintenance plan for maintaining pump-out and waste/sewage disposal facilities and services. (ii) A spill response plan for oil and other spilled products. Compliance with federal or state law may fulfill this requirement. (iii) An operational plan that, at a minimum, describes procedures for fuel handling and storage; measures, including signage, for informing marina users of applicable regulations; measures for collecting garbage and recyclables; measures and equipment for ensuring public safety. (iv) A visual assessment of views from surrounding residential properties, public viewpoints, and the view of the shoreline from the water surface. (v) An assessment of existing water-dependent uses in the vicinity including but not limited to, navigation, fishing, shellfish production and harvest, swimming, beach walking, and picnicking and shall document potential impacts and mitigating measures. The county shall evaluate impacts on these resources and impose specific conditions to mitigate impacts as necessary. (87) Regulations – Mooring Buoys. (a) Commercial or recreational mooring buoys may be permitted; provided, that they are consistent with this program and that individually or cumulatively: (i) They do not impede the ability of other landowners to access private property; and (ii) They do not pose a hazard to or obstruct navigation or fishing; and (iii) They do not contribute to water quality or habitat degradation; and (iv) They do not pose a threat to a commercial shellfish growing area classification or reduce the ability to upgrade the classification. (b) The installation and use of mooring buoys (including commercial and recreational buoys) in marine waters shall be consistent with all applicable state laws, including Chapter 246-282 WAC, the current National Shellfish Sanitation Program (NSSP) standards, and other State Departments of Fish and Wildlife, Health, and/or Natural Resources standards. Commented [LG69]: Task Force B Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 104/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (c) Private recreational mooring buoys on state-owned aquatic lands shall not be used for residential (living on the boat) or commercial purposes. (d) Mooring buoys shall be located to: (i) Avoid, to the extent feasible, and minimize disturbance of eelgrass beds and other valuable aquatic and nearshore habitat areas; and (ii) Prevent obstruction to navigation. (e) Mooring buoys shall use neutral buoyancy rope, mid-line float, helical anchors, or other state- approved designs that have minimal adverse effects on aquatic ecosystem and fish. Only if the substrate prohibits use of embedded anchors, may a Corps-approved alternative anchor (i.e., concrete block) be used. (f) Mooring buoys shall not be allowed on lake shorelines of the state. (g) Mooring buoys shall be clearly marked and labeled with the owner’s name and contact information and permit number(s). (h) The county shall plan for and coordinate with other agencies to control the placement and number of mooring buoys within bays and other areas to protect water quality and/or habitat and ensure that transit channels are maintained. (i) Applicants are encouraged to consult with and obtain a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers prior to pursuing state and county permits to minimize applicant effort and conflicts with differing agency standards. (ii) Under no circumstances shall mooring buoy density exceed State Department of Health guidelines and National Shellfish Sanitation Program (NSSP) standards. (iii) Residential lots may have up to two buoys to support moorage of a single boat if necessary to stabilize the boat and minimize damage to ecological resources or other boats. (i) The capacity of each mooring buoy may not exceed one boat and its appurtenant shore access craft. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VII § 2)] 18.25.360 Dredging. (1) Policies. (a) Dredging, as defined in Article II of this chapter, and disposal of dredge material should only be allowed when alternatives are infeasible and when the dredging/dredge disposal is: (i) Necessary to support an existing legal use or a proposed water-dependent use or essential public infrastructure/facility; or (ii) Part of a clean-up program required under the Model Toxics Control Act or Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act; or (iii) Part of an approved ecological restoration or enhancement project; or Commented [AS70]: Recovered the “Avoid” and rearranged to address WDFW’s comment in e-mail dated 3/25/21. Commented [LG71]: This language consistent with WDFW, WDNR, and USACE regs. Commented [AS72]: Added per comment provided by WDFW in letter dated 11/23/2020. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 105/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (iv) Part of an approved beach nourishment project; or (v) Required to provide public access for a substantial number of people; or (vi) Required to provide water-oriented public recreation for a substantial number of people. (b) When required to support an allowed use or development, dredging/dredge disposal should be the minimum needed to accommodate the allowed use or development for a reasonably foreseeable period of time. (c) When allowed, dredging and disposal operations should be planned, timed and implemented to minimize: (i) Adverse impacts to shoreline ecology; and (ii) Adverse impacts to in-water and adjacent upland uses; and (iii) Interference with navigation. (d) Dredging and dredge disposal should be consistent and coordinated with appropriate local, state and federal regulations to minimize duplication during the review process. (e) Dredging and dredge disposal should not occur where they would interfere with existing or potential ecological restoration activities. (f) Dredging and dredge disposal should occur where they will provide ecological benefits. (2) Shoreline Environment Regulations. (a) Priority Aquatic. Dredging and dredge disposal may be permitted subject to a conditional use permit if allowed in the adjacent upland environment. (b) Aquatic. Dredging and dredge disposal may be permitted subject to a conditional use permit if allowed in the adjacent upland environment. (c) Natural. Dredging and dredge disposal are prohibited except dredging and dredge disposal may be permitted as an essential element of an approved shoreline restoration project/program. (d) Conservancy. Dredging and dredge disposal may be permitted subject to a conditional use permit. (e) Shoreline Residential. Dredging and dredge disposal may be permitted subject to a conditional use permit. (f) High Intensity. Dredging may be permitted subject to the policies and regulations of this program. Dredge disposal may be allowed with a conditional use permit. (3) Regulations – Dredging. (a) Proponents of new development shall locate and design such development to avoid or, if avoidance is not possible, to minimize the need for new dredging and maintenance dredging. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 106/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (b) The county may permit dredging only when the project proponent demonstrates the activity is consistent with this program and that there are no feasible alternatives to dredging. (c) Dredging shall only be allowed when necessary to support the following uses and developments: (i) Approved harbors, marinas, ports, and water-dependent industries; (ii) Development or maintenance of essential public infrastructure and facilities; (iii) Environmental clean-up activities required by the Model Toxics Control Act or Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act; (iv) Underground utility installation requiring trenches when boring, directional drilling, and other installation methods are not feasible; (v) Maintenance dredging for the purpose of restoring a lawfully established use or development; (vi) Maintenance dredging for the purpose of restoring previously permitted or authorized hydraulic capacity of a stream or river; (vii) Maintenance of existing irrigation reservoirs, drains, canals, or ditches; (viii) Establishing, expanding, relocating or reconfiguring navigation channels and basins where necessary to assure the safety and efficiency of existing navigational uses; (ix) Ecological restoration and enhancement projects benefiting water quality and/or fish and wildlife habitat; or (x) Public access and public water-oriented recreational developments/uses, including construction of public piers and docks that benefit substantial numbers of people. (d) The county may permit dredging for flood management purposes only when the project proponent demonstrates that: (i) The dredging is a required component of a county-approved comprehensive flood management plan; or (ii) The dredging has a long-term benefit to public health and safety and will not cause a net loss of ecological functions and processes. (e) When conducting reviews of dredging proposals, the county shall first consider how the proposed activity has been regulated by other agencies, note same as a reference, and then establish what further information is needed for local review. The county may require information to ensure: (i) The project is designed, located, and timed to mitigate impacts on legally established neighboring uses and developments; and (ii) Appropriate measures are taken to ensure the activity will not interfere with fishing or shellfishing; and Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 107/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (iii) Appropriate measures are taken to minimize adverse effects on recreation, public access, and navigation; and (iv) The activity shall not adversely impact natural processes such as channel migration, marine bluff erosion and/or net-shoreline drift; and (v) Appropriate best management practices are employed to prevent water quality impacts or other forms of environmental degradation; and (vi) Upstream and upgradient sediment sources that create the need for dredging have been investigated and where feasible, mitigated; and (vii) Appropriate measures are employed to protect public safety and prevent adverse impacts on other approved shoreline uses; and (viii) The proposed activity complies with applicable federal, state, and other local regulations. (f) Dredging for the primary purpose of obtaining material for landfill, upland construction, or beach nourishment shall be prohibited. (g) Maintenance dredging may not be approved under exemption except within the existing footprint in accordance with previous approved plans. (4) Regulations – Dredge Disposal. (a) The county may permit disposal of dredge material only when the project proponent demonstrates the activity is consistent with this program and that there are no feasible alternatives to dredge disposal. (b) When dredge material is deposited on land it shall be considered fill and subject to all applicable fill regulations. (c) All unconfined, open water dredge disposal activities shall comply with the Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis (PSDDA) criteria and guidelines and other applicable local, state and federal regulations. (d) When consistent with this program, disposal of dredged materials in water areas other than PSDDA sites may only be allowed for the following reasons: (i) To restore or enhance habitat; or (ii) To reestablish substrates for fish and shellfish resources; or (iii) To nourish beaches that are starved for sediment; or (iv) To remediate contaminated sediments. (e) Proposals for dredged material disposal shall be evaluated for their potential to cause adverse environmental impacts. Dredged material disposal shall be permitted only when the proponent demonstrates all of the following: Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 108/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (i) The proposed action will not cause significant and/or ongoing damage to water quality, fish, shellfish and/or other biological resources; and (ii) The proposed action will not adversely alter natural drainage, water circulation, sediment transport, currents, or tidal flows or significantly reduce floodwater storage capacities; and (iii) The proposed action includes all feasible mitigation measures to protect marine, estuarine, freshwater and terrestrial species and habitats. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VII § 3)] 18.25.370 Filling and excavation. (1) Policies. (a) Filling, as defined in Article II of this chapter, should only be allowed waterward of the ordinary high water mark when alternatives are infeasible and when the filling is: (i) Necessary to support an approved water-dependent use or essential public infrastructure/facility; or (ii) Part of an approved ecological restoration or enhancement project; or (iii) Part of an approved aquaculture operation when the fill is required to improve production; or (iv) Part of an approved beach nourishment project; or (v) Required to provide public access for a substantial number of people; or (vi) Required to provide water-oriented public recreation for a substantial number of people. (b) Filling and excavation should not be allowed where structural shoreline stabilization would be required to maintain the materials placed or excavated. (c) When allowed, filling and excavation should be conducted so that water quality, habitat, hydrology, natural erosion rates, and runoff/drainage patterns are not adversely affected. (2) Shoreline Environment Regulations. (a) Priority Aquatic. Filling may be permitted subject to a conditional use permit if allowed in the adjacent upland environment. (b) Aquatic. Filling may be permitted subject to a conditional use permit if allowed in the adjacent upland environment. (c) Natural. Filling and excavation is prohibited, except filling and excavation may be permitted as an essential element of an approved shoreline restoration project/program. (d) Conservancy. Filling and excavation may be permitted subject to the policies and regulations of this program and a conditional use permit. (e) Shoreline Residential. Filling and excavation may be permitted subject to the policies and regulations of this program. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 109/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (f) High Intensity. Filling and excavation may be permitted subject to the policies and regulations of this program. (3) Regulations. (a) Filling and/or excavation shall only be allowed as part of an approved shoreline use and/or development activity and shall be subject to the requirements of the primary use/development. (b) Excavation below the ordinary high water mark shall be considered dredging and shall be subject to JCC 18.25.360 (Dredging). (c) When allowed, filling and/or excavation shall be located, designed, and carried out in a manner that: (i) Minimizes adverse impacts on the shoreline environment; and (ii) Blends in physically and visually with natural topography, so as not to interfere with appropriate use, impede public access, or degrade the aesthetic qualities of the shoreline; and (iii) Does not require shoreline armoring or stabilization to protect materials placed unless it is part of an approved shoreline restoration project and shoreline armoring or stabilization measures are needed to keep the material in place. (d) Fill materials placed within shoreline jurisdiction shall be from an approved source and shall consist of clean sand, gravel, soil, rock or similar material. The use of contaminated material or construction debris shall be prohibited. (e) Fill placed waterward of the ordinary high water mark shall only be permitted when alternatives are infeasible and when the filling/excavation is necessary to support one or more of the following: (i) Approved marinas, ports, and other water-dependent industries where upland alternatives or structural solutions including pile or pier supports are infeasible. (ii) Development or maintenance of essential public infrastructure and facilities. (iii) Environmental clean-up activities required by MTCA and CERCLA. (iv) Maintenance of a lawfully established use or development. (v) Ecological restoration and enhancement projects benefiting water quality and/or fish and wildlife habitat. (vi) Public access and public water-oriented recreation projects benefiting substantial numbers of people. (vii) Part of an approved shoreline stabilization, flood control or in-stream structure project when consistent with this program. (f) Filling in areas of special flood hazard shall conform to the flood damage prevention provisions of Chapter 15.15 JCC. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 110/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (g) The following information shall be required for all proposals involving fill or excavation unless the county determines that issues are adequately addressed via another regulatory review process: (i) A description of the proposed use of the fill area; and (ii) A description of the fill material, including its source, and physical, chemical and biological characteristics; and (iii) A description of the method of placement and compaction; and (iv) A description of the location of the fill relative to natural and/or existing drainage patterns; and (v) A description and map of the fill area and depth relative to the ordinary high water mark (OHWM); and (vi) A description of proposed means to control erosion and stabilize the fill; and (vii) A temporary erosion and sediment control (TESC) plan; and (viii) A description of proposed surface runoff control measures. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VII § 4)] 18.25.380 Flood control structures. (1) Policies. (a) The county should prevent the need for flood control works by limiting new development in flood-prone areas. (b) New or expanded development or uses in the shoreline, including subdivision of land, that would likely require flood control structures within a stream, channel migration zone, or floodway should be prohibited. (c) Construction of new flood control structures should only be allowed where there is a documented need to protect an existing structure and mitigation is applied, consistent with this program. New development should be designed and located to preclude the need for such flood control structures. (d) When evaluating the need for flood control structures such as traditional levees and/or dams, opportunities to remove or relocate existing developments and structures out of flood-prone areas should be pursued to the maximum extent feasible. Alternative measures, such as overflow corridors and setback levees, that may have less adverse impact on shoreline ecology should be considered before structural flood control measures can be approved. (e) Probable effects on ecological functions and processes should be fully evaluated for consistency with this program before flood control structures are permitted. (f) Flood control structures are a necessary and appropriate means of protecting existing development only when all of the following are met: (i) The primary use being protected is consistent with this program; and Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 111/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (ii) Nonstructural flood hazard reduction measures are infeasible; and (iii) Where such structures can be developed in a manner that is compatible with multiple use of streams; and (iv) Where shoreline resources such as fish and wildlife habitat and recreation are protected in the long term. (g) When proven necessary, flood control structures should be located, designed, and maintained in a manner that: (i) Minimizes adverse effects on shoreline ecology; and (ii) Is compatible with navigation and recreation, especially in shorelines of statewide significance; provided, that public safety and ecological protection are fully addressed; and (iii) Incorporates native vegetation to enhance ecological functions, creates a more natural appearance, improves ecological processes, and provides more flexibility for long-term shoreline management. (iv) Nonregulatory methods to protect, enhance, and restore shoreline ecological functions and processes and other shoreline resources should be encouraged as an alternative to flood control structures. Nonregulatory methods may include public facility and resource planning, land or easement acquisition, education, voluntary protection and enhancement projects, or incentive programs. (h) The county should continue to develop long-term, comprehensive flood hazard management plans in cooperation with other applicable agencies and persons to prevent flood damage, maintain the natural hydraulic capacity of streams and floodplains, and conserve or restore valuable, limited resources such as fish, water, soil, and recreation and scenic areas. (i) Planning and design of flood control structures should be consistent with and incorporate elements from adopted watershed management plans, restoration plans and/or surface water management plans. (2) Shoreline Environment Regulations. (a) Priority Aquatic. Flood control structures may be permitted subject to the policies and regulations of this program and a conditional use permit if allowed in the adjacent upland environment. (b) Aquatic. Flood control structures may be permitted subject to the policies and regulations of this program and a conditional use permit if allowed in the adjacent upland environment. (c) Natural. Flood control structures are prohibited. (d) Conservancy. Flood control structures may be permitted subject to the policies and regulations of this program and a conditional use permit. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 112/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (e) Shoreline Residential. Flood control structures may be allowed subject to the policies and regulations of this program and a conditional use permit. (f) High Intensity. Flood control structures may be permitted subject to the policies and regulations of this program and a conditional use permit. (3) Regulations. (a) Flood control structures shall be permitted only when there is credible engineering and scientific evidence that: (i) They are necessary to protect existing, lawfully established development; and (ii) They are consistent with Chapters 15.15 and 18.30 JCC and the county Comprehensive Plan; and (iii) Nonstructural flood hazard reduction measures are infeasible; and (iv) Proposed measures are consistent with an adopted comprehensive flood hazard management plan if available. (b) When permitted, flood control structures shall be: (i) Constructed and maintained in a manner that does not degrade the quality of affected waters or the habitat value associated with the in-stream and riparian area; and (ii) Placed landward of the OHWM except for weirs, current deflectors and similar structures whose primary purpose is to protect public bridges and roads; and (iii) Placed landward of associated wetlands and designated habitat conservation areas, except for structures whose primary purpose is to improve ecological functions; and (iv) Designed based on engineering and scientific analyses that provide the highest degree of protection to shoreline ecological functions or processes; and (v) Designed to allow for normal ground water movement and surface runoff. Natural in-stream features such as snags, uprooted trees, or stumps should be left in place unless they are actually causing bank erosion or higher flood stages; and (vi) Designed to allow streams to maintain point bars and associated aquatic habitat through normal accretion so that the stream can maintain normal meander progression and maintain most of its natural storage capacity. (c) When permitted, dikes and levees shall be limited to that height required to protect adjacent lands from the predictable annual flood unless it can be demonstrated through hydraulic modeling that a greater height is needed and will not adversely impact shoreline ecological functions and processes. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 113/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (d) Flood control works are prohibited on estuary or embayment shores, on point and channel bars, and in salmon and trout spawning areas, except for the purpose of fish or wildlife habitat enhancement or restoration. (e) Flood control structures and stream channelization projects that damage fish and wildlife resources, recreation or aesthetic resources, or create high flood stages and velocities shall be prohibited. (f) Use of solid waste such as motor vehicles, derelict vessels, appliances, or demolition debris; construction of flood control works is prohibited. (g) Flood control structures shall not adversely affect valuable recreation resources and aesthetic values such as point and channel bars, islands, and braided banks. (h) The county shall require flood control structures to be professionally engineered and designed prior to final approval. The design shall be consistent with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Aquatic Habitat Guidelines and other applicable guidance and regulatory requirements. (i) No flood control structure shall be installed or constructed without the developer having obtained all applicable federal, state, and local permits and approvals, including but not limited to a Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) from the Department of Fish and Wildlife. (j) Removal of beaver dams to control or limit flooding shall be allowed; provided, that the project proponent coordinates with the Department of Fish and Wildlife and obtains all necessary permits and approvals from the state. (k) To determine that the provisions of this section are fully addressed, the county may require one or more technical studies/reports at the time of permit application for flood control structures unless the county determines that issues are adequately addressed via another regulatory review process. Technical reports required pursuant to this section shall address the following: (i) An analysis of the flood frequency, duration and severity and expected health and safety risks as a rationale and justification for the proposed structure. (ii) A hydraulic analysis prepared by a licensed professional engineer that describes anticipated effects of the project on stream hydraulics, including potential increases in base flood elevation, changes in stream velocity, and the potential for redirection of the normal flow of the affected stream. (iii) A biological resource inventory and analysis prepared by a qualified professional biologist that describes the anticipated effects of the project on fish and wildlife resources. (iv) Proposed provisions for accommodating public access to and along the affected shoreline, as well as any proposed on-site recreational features. (v) A description of any proposed plans to remove vegetation and revegetate the site following construction. (l) To ensure compliance with the no net loss provisions of this program, the county may require the proponent to prepare a mitigation plan that describes measures for protecting shoreline and in- Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 114/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. stream resources during construction and operation of a flood control structure. The required mitigation shall be commensurate with the value and type of resource or system lost. Mitigation activities shall be monitored by the proponent to determine the effectiveness of the mitigation plan. In instances where the existing mitigation measures are found to be ineffective, the proponent shall take corrective action that satisfies the objectives of the mitigation plan. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VII § 5)] 18.25.390 In-stream structures. (1) Policies. (a) Large-scale in-stream structures such as hydroelectric dams and related facilities are discouraged in Jefferson County. Such facilities should not be permitted except in the rare instance where there is clear evidence that the benefits to county residents outweigh any potential adverse ecological impacts. (b) In-stream structures should be approved only when associated with and necessary for an ecological restoration project, a fish passage project, or an allowed shoreline use/development such as a utility or industrial facility. (c) When necessary, in-stream structures should be located, designed, operated and maintained in a manner that minimizes adverse effects on the stream functions and processes. (d) Proposals for new in-stream structures should be evaluated for their potential adverse effects on the physical, hydrological, and biological characteristics as well as effects on species that inhabit the stream or riparian area. (e) When necessary, in-stream structures should be planned and designed to be compatible with navigation and recreation, especially in shorelines of statewide significance; provided, that public safety and ecological protection are fully addressed. (2) Shoreline Environment Regulations. (a) Priority Aquatic. In-stream structures may be allowed subject to the policies and regulations of this program and a conditional use permit if allowed in the adjacent upland environment. (b) Aquatic. In-stream structures may be allowed subject to the policies and regulations of this program and a conditional use permit if allowed in the adjacent upland environment. (c) Natural. In-stream structures are prohibited, except that in-stream structures (such as large woody debris) whose primary purpose is restoration of shoreline ecological conditions may be permitted subject to the provisions of this program. (d) Conservancy. In-stream structures may be allowed subject to the policies and regulations of this program and a conditional use permit. (e) Shoreline Residential. In-stream structures may be allowed subject to the policies and regulations of this program and a conditional use permit. (f) High Intensity. In-stream structures may be allowed subject to the policies and regulations of this program and a conditional use permit. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 115/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (3) Regulations. (a) Dams and associated power generating facilities shall not be permitted except in the rare instance where there is clear evidence that the benefits to county residents outweigh any potential adverse ecological impacts. The criteria for approving such facilities will depend on the specific location including its particular physical, cultural, and ecological conditions. Prior to approving or denying such facilities, the county shall consult citizens and appropriate agencies to evaluate in- stream structure proposals. (b) In-stream structures whose primary purpose is flood control shall be subject to JCC 18.25.380 (Flood control structures) and this section. In-stream structures whose purpose is power generation shall be subject to the policies and regulations for JCC 18.25.470 (industrial use) and this section. (c) When permitted, in-stream structures and their support facilities shall be: (i) Constructed and maintained in a manner that does not degrade the quality of affected waters or the habitat value associated with the in-stream and riparian area; and (ii) Located and designed based on reach analysis to avoid the need for structural shoreline armoring. (d) All in-water diversion structures shall be designed to permit the natural transport of bedload materials. All debris, overburden and other waste materials from construction shall be disposed of in such a manner that prevents their entry into a water body. (e) In-stream structures shall not impede upstream or downstream migration of anadromous fish. (f) Small-scale power generating microturbines may be placed in streams, provided they do not create impoundments and there are no adverse effects on shoreline functions and processes, including but not limited to, stream flow, habitat structure, temperature, and/or water quality. The county shall take appropriate measures and precautions to prevent the proliferation of small-scale power generating apparatus as necessary to prevent cumulative adverse impacts. (g) The county shall require any proposed in-stream structure to be professionally engineered and designed prior to final approval. (h) No in-stream structure shall be installed without the developer having obtained all applicable federal, state, and local permits and approvals, including but not limited to a Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) from the State Department of Fish and Wildlife. (i) The county shall require the proponent of any in-stream structure proposal to provide the following information prior to final approval unless the county determines that the issues are adequately addressed via another regulatory review process: (i) A site suitability analysis that provides the rationale and justification for the proposed structure. The analysis shall include a description and analysis of alternative sites, and a thorough discussion of the environmental impacts of each; and (ii) A hydraulic analysis prepared by a licensed professional engineer that describes anticipated effects of the project on stream hydraulics, including potential increases in base flood Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 116/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. elevation, changes in stream velocity, and the potential for redirection of the normal flow of the affected stream; and (iii) A biological resource inventory and analysis prepared by a qualified professional biologist that describes the anticipated effects of the project on fish and wildlife resources; and (iv) For hydropower facilities, the proposed location and design of powerhouses, penstocks, accessory structures and access and service roads; and (v) Proposed provisions for accommodating public access to and along the affected shoreline, as well as any proposed on-site recreational features; and (vi) A description of any plans to remove vegetation and/or revegetate the site following construction; and proposed mitigation plan that describes, in detail, provisions for protecting in-stream resources during construction and operation, and measures to compensate for impacts that resources that cannot be avoided. (vii) A description of sites proposed for the depositing of debris, overburden, and other waste materials generated during construction. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VII § 6)] 18.25.400 Restoration. (1) Policies. (a) Protection of existing resources is the best way to ensure the long-term health and well-being of Jefferson County shorelines. Restoration should be used to complement the protection strategies required by this program to achieve the greatest overall ecological benefit. (b) This program recognizes the importance of restoring shoreline ecological functions and processes. Jefferson County supports cooperative restoration efforts by strategically organizing programs between local, state, and federal public agencies, tribes, nonprofit organizations, and landowners to improve shorelines with impaired ecological functions and/or processes. (c) Restoration actions should restore shoreline ecological functions and processes as well as shoreline features and should be targeted toward meeting the needs of sensitive and/or regionally important plant, fish and wildlife species. (d) Restoration should be integrated with and should support other natural resource management efforts in Jefferson County and in the greater Puget Sound region. (e) Priority should be given to restoration actions that meet the goals and objectives contained in JCC 18.25.170 (Restoration and enhancement). (f) When prioritizing restoration actions, the county should give highest priority to measures that have the greatest chance of reestablishing ecosystem processes and creating self-sustaining habitats. (2) Shoreline Environment Regulations. (a) Priority Aquatic. Restoration may be permitted subject to provisions of this program. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 117/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (b) Aquatic. Restoration may be permitted subject to provisions of this program. (c) Natural. Restoration may be permitted subject to provisions of this program. (d) Conservancy. Restoration may be permitted subject to provisions of this program. (e) Shoreline Residential. Restoration may be permitted subject to provisions of this program. (f) High Intensity. Restoration may be permitted subject to provisions of this program. (3) Regulations. Restoration shall be carried out in accordance with an approved restoration plan and in accordance with the policies and regulations of this program. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VII § 7)] (4) The County may grant relief from shoreline master program development standards and use regulations resulting from shoreline restoration projects within urban growth areas consistent with criteria and procedures in WAC 173-27-215. 18.25.410 Structural shoreline armoring and shoreline stabilization. (1) Policies. (a) The county should take active measures to preserve natural unarmored shorelines and prevent the proliferation of bulkheads and other forms of shoreline armoring. (b) Nonstructural stabilization measures including relocating structures, increasing buffers, enhancing vegetation, managing drainage and runoff and other measures are preferred over structural shoreline armoring. (c) Structural shoreline armoring should only be permitted when necessary to support a primary structure associated with an approved shoreline use/development, public infrastructure, and/or essential public facilities when other alternatives are infeasible. (d) Where beach erosion threatens an existing use or development, proposals for new structural shoreline armoring should evaluate a range of options and designs. On a reach-specific basis, causes of erosion as well as effects should be evaluated. Beach management issues such as sediment conveyance, geohydraulic processes, and ecological relationships all should be considered in arriving at a design to minimize disturbance. (e) Shoreline stabilization and shoreline armoring for the purpose of leveling or extending property or creating or preserving residential lawns, yards or landscaping should not be allowed. (f) When structural shoreline armoring is determined necessary to protect public infrastructure and primary structures, it should be located, designed, and maintained in a manner that minimizes adverse effects on shoreline ecology, including effects on the project site, adjacent properties, and sediment transport to downdrift areas. (g) Before approving shoreline armoring structures, the county should require the proponent to identify, address and mitigate probable effects on shoreline processes and functions. (h) Shoreline armoring structures should be located and designed based on an understanding of long-term physical shoreline processes. The structural shoreline armoring should fit the physical Commented [LG73]: 2009 a Periodic Checklist Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 118/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. character and hydraulic energy of a specific shoreline reach, which may differ substantially from adjacent reaches. (i) Vertical concrete or rock walls should be avoided whenever possible and only be used to protect shorelines as a last resort and only when extreme measures are required. (j) Structural shoreline armoring should not interfere with existing or future public access to public shorelines nor with other appropriate shoreline uses such as navigation, seafood harvest, or recreation. (k) When seeking approval for new structural shoreline armoring, the project proponent should include public access that is consistent with JCC 18.25.290 (Public access). (l) Proponents of new structural shoreline armoring should coordinate with other affected property owners and public agencies to address ecological and geo-hydraulic processes, sediment conveyance and beach management issues for the whole drift sector (net shoreline-drift cell) or shoreline reach where feasible. (m) Where feasible, any failing, harmful, unnecessary, or ineffective structural shoreline armoring should be removed, and shoreline ecological functions and processes should be restored using nonstructural methods. (n) In addition to conforming to the regulations in this program, nonregulatory methods to protect, enhance, and restore shoreline ecological functions and other shoreline resources should be encouraged. Nonregulatory methods may include public facility and resource planning, technical assistance, education, voluntary enhancement and restoration projects, land acquisition and restoration, or other incentive programs. (2) Shoreline Environment Regulations. (a) Priority Aquatic. Shoreline stabilization may be permitted subject to the provisions of this program. New structural shoreline armoring is prohibited, except to protect existing public transportation infrastructure and essential public facilities, in which case it may be allowed as a conditional use. (b) Aquatic. Shoreline stabilization may be permitted subject to the provisions of this program. Structural shoreline armoring to protect existing public transportation infrastructure and existing essential public facilities may be allowed as a conditional use if allowed in the adjacent upland environment. Structural shoreline armoring to protect new residential developments is prohibited. (c) Natural. Shoreline stabilization may be permitted subject to the provisions of this program. Structural shoreline armoring is prohibited except that structural shoreline armoring to protect existing public transportation infrastructure and existing essential public facilities may be allowed as a conditional use. (d) Conservancy. Shoreline stabilization may be permitted subject to the provisions of this program. Shoreline armoring structures may be permitted as a conditional use. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 119/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (e) Shoreline Residential. Shoreline stabilization may be permitted subject to the provisions of this program. Shoreline armoring structures may be permitted as a conditional use. (f) High Intensity. Shoreline stabilization may be permitted subject to the provisions of this program. Shoreline armoring structures may be permitted as a conditional use. (3) Regulations – Existing Structural Shoreline Armoring. (a) Existing structural shoreline armoring, as defined in Article II of this chapter, may be replaced in kind if there is a demonstrated need to protect public transportation infrastructure, essential public facilities, and primary structures from erosion caused by currents, tidal action, or waves and all of the following apply: (i) The replacement structure is designed, located, sized, and constructed to assure no net loss of ecological functions. (ii) The replacement structure performs the same stabilization function of the existing structure and does not require additions to or increases in size. (iii) The replacement structure shall not encroach waterward of the ordinary high water mark or existing structure unless the residence was occupied prior to January 1, 1992, and there are overriding safety or environmental concerns. In such cases, the replacement structure shall abut the existing shoreline stabilization structure. (b) Removal of older structures is required as new ones are put in place. Exceptions may be made by the administrator only in cases where removal would cause more ecological disturbance than leaving the remnant structure in place. (4) Regulations – Subdivisions and Existing Lots without Structures. (a) Land subdivisions shall be designed using geotechnical analysis to assure that future development or use of the established lots will not require structural shoreline armoring or shoreline stabilization. (b) Use of a bulkhead, revetment or similar shoreline armoring to protect a platted lot where no primary use or structure presently exists shall be prohibited. Where such shoreline armoring already exists, property owners are strongly encouraged to remove it. (c) Structural shoreline armoring or shoreline stabilization for the sole purpose of leveling or extending property or creating or preserving residential lawns, yards, or landscaping shall be prohibited. Where such shoreline armoring already exists, property owners are strongly encouraged to remove it. (5) Regulations – New or Expanded Shoreline Armoring, When Allowed. (a) Structural shoreline armoring shall be prohibited in or adjacent to lakes and other low energy environments such as bays, and accreting marine shores. Where such shoreline armoring already exists, property owners are strongly encouraged to remove it. Commented [LG74]: added per WAC 173-26- 231(3)(a)(iii)(A) Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 120/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (b) New structural shoreline armoring may be permitted and existing structural shoreline armoring may be expanded only when one or more of the following apply: (i) When necessary to support a project whose primary purpose is enhancing or restoring ecological functions. (ii) As part of an effort to remediate hazardous substances pursuant to Chapter 70.105 RCW. (iii) When necessary to protect public transportation infrastructure or essential public facilities and other options are infeasible. (iv) When necessary to protect an existing, lawfully established primary structure or water- oriented use, including a residence but not including a boathouse or other accessory structure, that is in imminent danger of loss or substantial damage from erosion caused by tidal action, currents, or waves. (c) Proposals for new or expanded structural shoreline armoring allowed under subsection (5)(b) of this section shall clearly demonstrate all of the following before a permit can be issued: (i) The erosion is not being caused by upland conditions, such as the loss of vegetation or poor drainage. (ii) The structural shoreline armoring design is the least environmentally damaging alternative. (iii) The shoreline armoring complies with the flood damage prevention regulations in JCC 18.30.07015.15. (iv) Adverse impacts are fully mitigated according to the prescribed mitigation sequence such that there is no net loss of shoreline ecological functions or processes. (v) Alternatives to structural shoreline armoring including vegetative shoreline stabilization, flexible/natural materials and methods, beach nourishment and other forms of bioengineering are determined to be infeasible or insufficient. (d) When evaluating the need for new or expanded structural shoreline armoring, the administrator shall require the applicant to examine and implement alternatives to structural shoreline armoring in the following order of preference: (i) No action (allow the shoreline to retreat naturally). (ii) Increased building setbacks and/or relocated structures. (iii) Use of flexible/natural materials and methods, vegetation, beach nourishment, protective berms, or bioengineered shoreline stabilization. Soft approaches shall be used unless demonstrated not to be sufficient to protect primary structures, dwellings, and businesses. (e) The county shall require applicants for new or expanded structural shoreline armoring to provide credible evidence of erosion in a geotechnical analysis as the basis for documenting that the primary structure is in imminent danger from shoreline erosion caused by tidal action, currents, or waves. The evidencegeotechnical analysis shall: Commented [LG75]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Commented [LG76]: Added per WAC 173-26- 231(3)(a)(iii)(E) Commented [LG77]: Sea Level Rise reference: Similar to SMPs for South Bend Commented [LG78]: Added per WAC 173-26- 231(3)(a)(iii)(B)(II) Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 121/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (i) Demonstrate that the erosion is not due to landslides, sloughing or other forms of shoreline erosion unrelated to water action at the toe of the slope; and (ii) Include an assessment ofDemonstrate that the erosion is not due to on-site drainage and vegetation characteristics, and their effectscannot be addressed through on slope stability-site drainage improvements or vegetation planting; and (iii) Be prepared by a licensed professional engineer or geologist or other qualified professional with appropriate credentials. (6) Regulations – New or Expanded Shoreline Armoring, Design Standards. (a) New or expanded shoreline armoring shall be designed by a state licensed professional geotechnical engineer and/or engineering geologist and constructed according to applicable U.S. Army Corps of Engineers requirements and/or State Department of Fish and Wildlife Aquatic Habitat Guidelines. (b) The size of structural shoreline armoring shall be limited to the minimum necessary to protect the primary use or structure that it is intended to protect. (c) When shoreline armoring is permitted, isit shall be constructed of erosion resistant, environmentally safe and durable materials that are easy to maintain. (d) Shoreline armoring shall be designed and constructed with gravel backfill and weep holes so that natural downward movement of surface or ground water may continue without ponding or saturation that could compromise the surrounding soil stability. (e) All forms of structural shoreline armoring shall be constructed and maintained in a manner that does not degrade the quality of affected waters. The county may require setbacks, buffers, and/or other measures to achieve these objectives. (f) Shoreline defense structuresarmoring shall not be constructed with waste materials such as demolition debris, derelict vessels, tires, concrete or any other materials which might have adverse toxic or visual impacts on shoreline areas. (g) Gabions are prohibited as a means of stabilizing shorelines because of their limited durability and the potential hazard to shoreline users and the shoreline environment. (h) Proposals, other than single-family residential developments of more than four or fewer lots, that involve new or expanded shoreline armoring shall incorporate public access features consistent with JCC 18.25.290 (Public access). (7) Regulations – Bulkheads. (a) Bulkheads shall comply with the regulations noted in subsections (2) through (6) of this section. (b) Bulkheads shall meet all of the following criteria: (i) They shall be located generally parallel to the shoreline. Adequate bank toe protection shall be provided to ensure bulkhead stability without relying on additional rip-rap; and Commented [LG79]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 122/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (ii) They shall be located so as to tie in flush with existing bulkheads on adjoining properties, except when adjoining bulkheads do not comply with the design or location requirements set forth in this program. (8) Regulations – Revetments. (a) Revetments shall comply with the regulations noted in subsections (2) through (6) of this section. (b) Revetments shall meet all of the following criteria: (i) Revetments shall be placed landward of associated wetlands; and (ii) Revetments shall be located sufficiently landward of the stream channel to allow streams to maintain point bars and associated aquatic habitat through normal accretion; and (iii) Revetments shall be prohibited on estuarine shores, in wetlands, on point and channel bars, and in salmon and trout spawning areas. (c) Revetments or similar structures that have already cut off point bars from the stream shall be relocated if feasible. (d) When requesting a permit for a revetment along a stream or river, the applicant shall provide a geotechnical analysis of stream geomorphology both upstream and downstream of the proposed revetment site to assess the physical character and hydraulic energy potential of the specific stream reach and adjacent upstream or downstream reaches. The purpose of such analysis is to assure that the physical integrity of the stream corridor is maintained, that stream processes are not adversely affected, and that the revetment will not cause significant damage to other properties or shoreline functions and processes. (9) Regulations – Breakwaters, Jetties, and Seawalls. (a) Breakwaters, jetties, and seawalls shall comply with the regulations noted in subsections (2) through (6) of this section. (b) Breakwaters, jetties, and seawalls shall only be allowed when shown to be necessary: (i) For purposes of navigation, or fisheries or habitat enhancement; or (ii) To protect from strong wave action public water-dependent uses such as a harbor, marina, or port that are located seaward of the existing shoreline; or (iii) When adverse impacts on water circulation, sediment transport, fish and wildlife migration, shellfish, and aquatic vegetation can be effectively mitigated. (c) Open-pile, floating, portable, or submerged breakwaters, or several smaller discontinuous structures that are anchored in place, shall be preferred over fixed breakwaters. (10) Regulations –Shoreline Stabilization (including bioengineering and biostabilization). New, expanded, or replacement proposals for shoreline stabilization shall comply with applicable policies and Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 123/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. regulations in subsections (1), (2), and (11) of this section. If a stabilization proposal also includes hard armoring, the proposal shall be reviewed under applicable policies and regulations in subsections (1) through (9) and (11) of this section. (11) Regulations – Application Requirements. To verify that the provisions of this section are fully addressed, the county may require information to support a permit application for any type of structural shoreline armoring or shoreline stabilization. Application information required pursuant to this section shall address the urgency and risks associated with the specific site characteristics and shall include: (a) A scaled site plan showing: (i) existing site topography and (ii; (ii) the height, length, and width of existing and proposed armoring or stabilization; and (iii) the location of existing and proposed shoreline stabilization, shoreline armoring structures, and any fill including dimensions indicating distances to the OHWMand compass bearing between the face of the proposed armoring or stabilization and the OHWM, appropriate tidal elevation, and permanent benchmarks; and (b) A description of the processes affecting the site and surrounding areas, including but not limited to: tidal action and/or waves; slope instability or mass wasting; littoral drift; channel migration; and soil erosion, deposition, or accretion; and (c) A description of alternatives to structural approaches, and a thorough discussion of the environmental impacts of each alternative; and (d) A description of any proposed vegetation removal and a plan to revegetate the site following construction; and (e) A hydraulic analysis prepared by a licensed professional engineer that describes anticipated effects of the project on water and wave elevations and velocities; and (f(f) If required per subsections (4) and (5) above, a geotechnical report prepared by a licensed geotechnical engineer or engineering geologist. The report shall address the necessity for shoreline stabilization to protect a primary structure by estimating time frames and rates of erosion and assessing the urgency associated with the specific situation. As a general matter, hard armoring solutions should not be authorized except when a report confirms that there is a significant possibility that such a structure will be damaged within three years as a result of shoreline erosion in the absence of such hard armoring measures, or where waiting until the need is that immediate, would foreclose the opportunity to use measures that avoid impacts on ecological functions. Thus, where the geotechnical report confirms a need to prevent potential damage to a primary structure, but the need is not as immediate as three years, that report may still be used to justify more immediate authorization to protect against erosion using soft measures. (g) A biological resource inventory and analysis prepared by a qualified professional biologist that describes the anticipated effects of the project on fish and wildlife resources; and (gh) A description of opportunities for providing public access to and along the affected shoreline, as well as any proposed on-site recreational features if applicable; and (hi) A description of any waste and debris disposal sites for materials generated during construction; and Commented [AS80]: edits made in response to WDFW comment letter dated 11/23/2020 Commented [LG81]: added per WAC 173-26- 231(3)(a)(iii)(D) Commented [LG82]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 124/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (ij) Any other information that may be required to demonstrate compliance with the review criteria referenced in this section. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VII § 8)] Article VIII. Use-Specific Policies and Regulations 18.25.420 Purpose. This article describes policies and regulations that apply to specific uses and developments in the shoreline jurisdiction. The policies and regulations are intended to work in concert with the master program goals (Article III of this chapter) and the general policies and regulations (Article IV of this chapter). Policies and regulations that address specific shoreline modifications (e.g., bulkheads, piers, dredging, etc.) that may be associated with, or accessory to, a specific use are in Article VII of this chapter. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VIII)] 18.25.430 Agriculture. (1) Policies. (a) Agriculture is important to the long-term economic viability of Jefferson County. Consistent with WAC 173-26-241(3)(a)(ii), this program should not modify or limit ongoing agricultural activities occurring on agricultural lands. (b) New agricultural uses and development, as defined in Article II of this chapter, proposed on land not currently in agricultural use, and conversion of agricultural lands to non-agricultural uses, should conform to this program. (c) New agricultural use and development should be managed to: (i) Prevent livestock intrusion into the water; (ii) Control runoff; (iii) Prevent water quality contamination caused by nutrients and noxious chemicals; (iv) Minimize clearing of riparian areas; (v) Prevent bank erosion; and (vi) Assure no net loss of ecological functions and avoid adverse effects on shoreline resources and values. (d) New agricultural use and development should preserve and maintain native vegetation between tilled lands and adjacent water bodies. The width of the native vegetation zone should vary depending on site conditions with the overall goal being to limit clearing of riparian corridors. (e) Intensive residential, industrial and commercial uses and uses that are unrelated to agriculture should be located so as not to create conflicts with agricultural uses. (f) The county should promote cooperative arrangements between farmers and public recreation agencies so that public use of shorelines does not conflict with agricultural operations. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 125/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (g) Existing and new agricultural uses are encouraged to use best management practices to prevent erosion, runoff, and associated water quality impacts. (h) The county recognizes the importance of local food production, both on land and in water areas, when properly managed to control pollution and prevent environmental damage. As consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, RCW 36.70A.030, and 90.58.065, upland finfish aquaculture is considered agricultural production. However, for purposes of this program, upland finfish aquaculture should instead be managed as aquaculture and aquaculture activities, as defined in Article II of this chapter. (i) Collaborate with partners such as North Olympic Development Council (NODC), Washington State University (WSU), and Jefferson County Conservation District to assess likely impacts of climate change on agriculture and to develop mitigation and adaptation strategies suited to Jefferson County’s soils and farm economy. (Comprehensive Plan Policy NR-P-8.6) (2) Shoreline Environment Regulations. (a) Priority Aquatic. New agricultural activities are prohibited, except upland finfish aquaculture per the aquaculture policies and regulations of this program. (b) Aquatic. New agricultural activities are prohibited, except upland finfish aquaculture per the aquaculture policies and regulations of this program. (c) Natural. New agricultural activities are prohibited, except that low intensity agricultural activities such as grazing may be allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program; provided, that such low intensity agriculture does not expand or alter agricultural practices in a manner inconsistent with the purpose of this designation. All other agricultural activities are prohibited, except upland finfish aquaculture per the aquaculture policies and regulations of this program. (d) Conservancy. New agricultural activities may be allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program. (e) Shoreline Residential. New agricultural activities may be allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program. (f) High Intensity. New agricultural activities may be allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program. (3) Regulations. (a) In accordance with RCW 90.58.065, this program shall not restrict existing agriculture on agricultural land. Agricultural activities on agricultural lands, meeting the critical area exemption at JCC 18.22.230(4)(a), are also exempt from both JCC 18.22.230 and this program pursuant to RCW 90.58.065. (b) New agricultural use and development on lands not meeting the definition of agricultural land shall comply with this program and all of the following regulations: (i) Manure spreading shall be conducted in a manner that prevents animal wastes from entering water bodies or wetlands adjacent to water bodies. Manure spreading shall not be Commented [LG83]: Comp Plan: Policy NR-P-8.6 Commented [LG84R83]: Task Force C Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 126/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. allowed within the floodway or within 25 feet of the ordinary high water mark of any shoreline, whichever is greater. (ii) Confinement lots, feeding operations, lot wastes, manure storage or stockpiles, and storage of noxious chemicals shall not be allowed within floodways or within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of any shoreline, whichever is greater. (iii) A buffer of naturally occurring or planted native vegetation shall be maintained between the shoreline and areas used for crops or intensive grazing. The width of the buffer on marine, river, and lake shorelines shall correspond to the standards of this program. (iv) Bridges, culverts and/or ramps shall be used to enable livestock to cross streams without damaging the streambed or banks. (v) Stock watering facilities shall be provided so that livestock do not need to access streams or lakes for drinking water. (vi) Fencing or other grazing controls shall be used as appropriate to prevent bank compaction, bank erosion, or the overgrazing of, or damage to, shoreline buffer vegetation. (c) Upland finfish aquaculture use and development shall be subject to the Aquaculture policies and regulations (JCC 18.25.440). [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VIII § 1)] 18.25.440 Aquaculture. (1) Policies. (a) Aquaculture is a preferred, water-dependent use of regional and statewide interest that is important to the long-term economic viability, cultural heritage and environmental health of Jefferson County. (b) The county should support aquaculture uses and developments that: (i) Protect and improve water quality; and (ii) Minimize damage to important nearshore habitats; and (iii) Minimize interference with navigation and normal public use of surface waters; and (iv) Minimize the potential for cumulative adverse impacts, such as those resulting from in- water structures/apparatus/equipment, land-based facilities, and substrate disturbance/modification (including rate, frequency, and spatial extent). (c) When properly managed, aquaculture can result in long-term ecological and economic benefits. The county should engage in coordinated planning to identify potential aquaculture areas and assess long-term needs for aquaculture. This includes working with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFWWDFW), the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), area tribes and shellfish interests to identify areas that are suitable for aquaculture and protect them from uses that would threaten aquaculture’s long-term sustainability. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 127/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (d) Aquaculture use and development should locate in areas where biophysical conditions, such as tidal currents, water temperature and depth, will minimize adverse environmental impacts. Individual aquaculture uses and developments should be separated by a sufficient distance to ensure that significant adverse cumulative effects do not occur. (e) The county should support tideland aquaculture use and development when consistent with this program and protect tidelands and bedlands that were acquired and retained under the Bush and Callow Acts by not permitting non-aquaculture use and development on these tidelands. (f) Intensive residential uses, other industrial and commercial uses, and uses that are unrelated to aquaculture should be located so as not to create conflicts with aquaculture operations. (g) The county should promote cooperative arrangements between aquaculture growers and public recreation agencies so that public use of public shorelines does not conflict with aquaculture operations. (h) Experimental forms of aquaculture involving the use of new species, new growing methods or new harvesting techniques should be allowed when they are consistent with applicable state and federal regulations and this program. (i) The county should support community restoration projects associated with aquaculture when they are consistent with this program. (j) Commercial and recreational shellfish areas including shellfish habitat conservation areas are critical habitats. Shellfish aquaculture activities within all public and private tidelands and bedlands are allowed uses. Such activities include but are not limited to bed marking, preparation, planting, cultivation, and harvest. (k) Chemicals and fertilizers used in aquaculture operations should be used in accordance with state and federal laws, and this program. (l) The county recognizes upland finfish aquaculture is considered a type of agricultural production by the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, RCW 36.70A.030, and 90.58.065. However, for purposes of this program, upland finfish aquaculture should instead be managed as aquaculture and aquaculture activities, as defined in Article II of this chapter. (m) Finfish aquaculture that uses or releases herbicides, pesticides, antibiotics, fertilizers, pharmaceuticals, non-indigenous species, parasites, viruses, genetically modified organisms, feed, or other materials known to be harmful into surrounding waters should not be allowed unless significant impacts to surrounding habitat and conflicts with adjacent uses are effectively mitigated. (n) The county should prefer all finfish aquaculture use and development (in-water and upland) that operates with fully contained systems that treat effluent before discharge to local waters over open systems. (o) The county should allow in-water finfish aquaculture in the open waters of the Strait of Juan de Fuca only when the area seaward of the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) which is subject to the county’s jurisdiction extends a considerable distance, and when consistent with other provisions of this program. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 128/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (p) The county should prohibit in-water finfish aquaculture in waters of Jefferson County where there are habitat protection designations in place and/or water quality issues documented. (2) Uses and Activities Prohibited Outright. (a) In-water finfish aquaculture use/development, including net pens as defined in Article II of this chapter, shall be prohibited in the following areas due to established habitat protection designations and/or water quality issues: (i) Protection Island aquatic reserve or within 1,500 feet of the boundary; (ii) Smith and Minor Islands aquatic reserve or within 1,500 feet of the boundary; (iii) Discovery Bay, south of the boundary of the Protection Island aquatic reserve; (iv) South Port Townsend Bay mooring buoy management plan area; and (v) Hood Canal, south of the line extending from Tala Point to Foulweather Bluff, including Dabob and Tarboo Bays. (3) Shoreline Environment Regulations. (a) Priority Aquatic. Aquaculture activities, except for new geoduck aquaculture, may be allowed subject to the use and development regulations of the adjacent upland shoreline environment, except all finfish aquaculture (in-water and upland) is prohibited. New geoduck aquaculture may be allowed with a conditional use permit (C(d)). (b) Aquatic. Aquaculture activities, except for new geoduck aquaculture, may be allowed subject to the use and development regulations of the adjacent upland shoreline environment. New geoduck aquaculture may be allowed with a conditional use permit (C(d)). (c) Natural. Aquaculture activities, except for geoduck aquaculture, may be allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program. GeoduckNew geoduck aquaculture may be allowed with a conditional use permit (C(d)). All finfish aquaculture is prohibited, except in-water finfish aquaculture may be allowed with a conditional use permit (C(d)) where the area within the county’s jurisdiction extends seaward more than eight miles from the OHWM, as measured perpendicularly from shore. This does not require facilities to locate eight miles offshore; see other provisions of this section for siting requirements and supplemental maps for additional information. (d) Conservancy. Aquaculture activities, except for geoduck aquaculture, may be allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program. GeoduckNew geoduck and upland finfish aquaculture may be allowed with a conditional use permit (C(d)). In-water finfish aquaculture is prohibited. (e) Shoreline Residential. Aquaculture activities, except for geoduck aquaculture, may be allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program. GeoduckNew geoduck aquaculture may be allowed with a conditional use permit (C(d)). All finfish aquaculture (in-water and upland) is prohibited. Commented [LG85]: 2011 b Periodic Checklist Commented [GU86]: AJS: Requirements for CUP for new commercial geoduck aquaculture added per WAC 173-26- 241(3)(b)(iv)(A) Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 129/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (f) High Intensity. Aquaculture activities may be allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program, except all finfish aquaculture (in-water and upland) and new geoduck aquaculture may be allowed with a conditional use permit (C(d)). (g) For a summary and graphic approximation of the above shoreline environment regulations allowance of in-water finfish aquaculture, see Figure 18.25.440. Also see illustrative maps in JCC 18.25.880. Figure 18.25.440 – Summary and Maps of SED Allowance for In-Water Finfish Aquaculture Shoreline Environment Designations (SEDs) Waterward OHWM Landward Priority Aquatic Aquatic Natural Conservancy Shoreline Residential High Intensity Would in-water finfish aquaculture be allowed to locate in this SED? No Yes No No No Yes Notes But only when the adjacent upland SED allows Except when there is 8+ miles of seaward jurisdiction Geographic Limitations: 1 Not within the Protection Island Aquatic Reserve, the Smith and Minor Islands Aquatic Reserve or within 1,500 feet of their boundary 2 Not in Discovery Bay, south of the boundary for the Protection Island Aquatic Reserve, due to significant water quality concerns 3 Not within the South Port Townsend Bay mooring buoy management plan area or within 1,500 feet of the boundary, due to significant water quality concerns 4 Not in Hood Canal, south of the line from Tala Point to Foulweather Bluff (Kitsap County), due to significant water quality concerns Possible Siting Locations: 1 Strait of Juan de Fuca 2 Glen Cove 3 Mats Mats 4 Port Ludlow NOTE: Proposals also have to meet all conditional use permit (CUP) performance standards and other applicable provisions of this program. Approximate siting locations are illustrated in the following [moved four maps to 18.25.880]: Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 130/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (4) Regulations – General. (a) When a shoreline permit is issued for a new aquaculture use or development, that permit shall apply to the initial siting, construction, and/or planting or stocking of the facility or farm. If the initial approval is a shoreline substantial development permit, it shall be valid for a period of five years with a possible one-year extension. If the initial approval is a conditional use permit, it shall be valid for the period specified in the permit. (b) Ongoing maintenance, harvest, replanting, restocking of or changing the species cultivated in any existing or permitted aquaculture operation is not considered new use/development, and shall not require a new permit, unless or until: (i) The physical extent of the facility or farm is expanded by more than 25 percent or more than 25 percent of the facility/farm changes operational/cultivation methods compared to the conditions that existed as of the effective date of this program or any amendment thereto. If the amount of expansion or change in cultivation method exceeds 25 percent in any 10-year period, the entire operation shall be considered new aquaculture and shall be subject to applicable permit requirements of this section; or. This calculation of 25% expansion applies to both in-water and above OHWM development; or (ii) The facility proposes to cultivate species not previously cultivated in the state of Washington. (c) Aquaculture uses and activities involving hatching, seeding, planting, cultivating, raising and/or harvesting of planted or naturally occurring shellfish shall not be considered development, as defined in Article II of this chapter, and shall not require a shoreline substantial development permit, unless: (i) The activity substantially interferes with normal public use of surface waters; or (ii) The activity involves placement of any structures as defined in Article II of this chapter; or (iii) The activity involves dredging using mechanical equipment such as clamshell, dipper, or scraper; or (iv) The activity involves filling of tidelands or bedlands. (d) The county shall assess the potential for interference described in subsection (34)(c) )(i) of this section on a case-by-case basis. All proposed new aquaculture uses or developments shall submit a joint aquatic resources permit application (JARPA) and SEPA checklist to enable assessment by the county. Activities shall not be considered to substantially interfere with normal public use of surface waters, unless: (i) They occur in, adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of public tidelands; and (ii) They involve the use of floating ropes, markers, barges, floats, or similar apparatus on a regular basis and in a manner that substantially obstructs public access, or passage from public facilities such as parks or boat ramps; or they exclude the public from more than one acre of surface water on an ongoing or permanent basis. Commented [LG87]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Commented [LG88]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 131/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (e) Aquaculture activities not listed in subsection (4)(c) of this section and listed activities that fail to meet any of the criteria in subsection (1)(b) of this section shall require a shoreline substantial development permit (SDP) or conditional use permit (CUP), and shall be subject to all of the following regulations: (i) Subtidal, intertidal, floating, and upland structures and apparatus associated with aquaculture use shall be located, designed and maintained to avoid adverse effects on ecological functions and processes. (ii) The county shall consider the location of proposed aquaculture facilities/farms to prevent adverse cumulative effects on ecological functions and processes and adjoining land uses. The county shall determine what constitutes acceptable placement and concentration of commercial aquaculture in consultation with state and federal agencies and tribes based on the specific characteristics of the waterbody, reach, drift cell, and uplands in the vicinity of the farm/facility. (iii) Upland structures accessory to aquaculture use that do not require a waterside location or have a functional relationship to the water shall be located landward of shoreline buffers required by this program. (iv) Overwater work shelters and sleeping quarters accessory to aquaculture use/development shall be prohibited. (v) Floating/hanging aquaculture structures and associated equipment shall not exceed 10 feet in height above the water’s surface. The administrator may approve hoists and similar structures greater than 10 feet in height when there is a clear demonstration of need. The 10- foot height limit shall not apply to vessels. (vi) Floating/hanging aquaculture facilities and associated equipment, except navigation aids, shall use colors and materials that blend into the surrounding environment in order to minimize visual impacts. (vii) Aquaculture use and development shall not materially interfere with navigation, or access to adjacent waterfront properties, public recreation areas, or tribal harvest areas. Mitigation shall be provided to offset such impacts where there is high probability that adverse impact would occur. This provision shall not be interpreted to mean that an operator is required to provide access across owned or leased tidelands at low tide for adjacent upland owners. (viii) Aquaculture uses and developments, except in-water finfish aquaculture, shall be located at least 600 feet from any National Wildlife Refuge, seal and sea lion haulouts, seabird nesting colonies, or other areas identified as critical feeding or migration areas for birds and mammals. In-water finfish facilities, including net pens, shall be located 1,500 feet or more from such areas. The county may approve lesser distances based upon written documentation that U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and affected tribes support the proposed location. (ix) Aquaculture use and development shall be sited so that shading and other adverse impacts to existing red/brown macro algae (kelp),) and eelgrass beds are avoided. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 132/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (x) Aquaculture uses and developments that require attaching structures to the bed or bottomlands shall use anchors, such as helical anchors, that minimize disturbance to substrate. (xi) Where aquaculture use and development are authorized to use public facilities, such as boat launches or docks, the county shall reserve the right to require the applicant/proponent to pay a portion of the maintenance costs and any required improvements commensurate with the applicant’s/proponent’s use. (xii) Aquaculture use and development shall employ nonlethal, nonharmful measures to control birds and mammals. Control methods shall comply with existing federal and state regulations. (xiii) Aquaculture use and development shall avoid use of chemicals, fertilizers and genetically modified organisms except when allowed by state and federal law. (xiv) Non-navigational directional lighting associated with aquaculture use and development shall be used wherever possible and area lighting shall be avoided and minimized to the extent necessary to conduct safe operations. Non-navigational lighting shall not adversely affect vessel traffic. (xv) Aquaculture waste materials and by-products shall be disposed of in a manner that will ensure strict compliance with all applicable governmental waste disposal standards, including but not limited to the Federal Clean Water Act, Section 401, and the Washington State Water Pollution Control Act (Chapter 90.48 RCW). (f) Prior to approving a permit for floating/hanging aquaculture use and development or bottom culture involving structures, the county may require a visual analysis prepared by the applicant/proponent describing effects on nearby uses and aesthetic qualities of the shoreline. The analysis shall demonstrate that adverse impacts on the character of those areas are effectively mitigated. (f) Aquacultural facilities shall be designed and located so as not to spread disease to native aquatic life, establish new nonnative species which cause significant ecological impacts, or significantly impact the aesthetic qualities of the shoreline. (5) Regulations – Finfish. (a) The culture of finfish, including net pens as defined in Article II of this chapter, may be allowed with a discretionary conditional use approvalpermit (C(d)) subject to the policies and regulations of this program. All finfish aquaculture (in-water and upland) shall meet, at a minimum, state- approved administrative guidelines for the management of net pen cultures. In the event there is a conflict in requirements, the more restrictive requirement shall prevail. (b) All in-water finfish aquaculture (in-water and upland) proposals for facilities/operations shall: (i) Provide the county, at the applicant’s/operator’s expense, a site characterization survey, baseline surveys, and annual monitoring as described in the 1986 Interim Guidelines, or subsequent documents approved by the state. The applicant/operator shall also provide the county with copies of all survey and monitoring reports submitted to Washington Departments of Ecology, Fish and Wildlife, and Natural Resources. (ii) Submit an operations plan that includes projections for: Commented [LG89]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Commented [AS90]: Relocated from the commercial geoduck section; this is the more appropriate location for these general provisions. Language from WAC 173-26- 241(3)(b)(C) Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 133/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (A) Improvements at the site (e.g., pens, booms, etc.) and their relationship to the natural features (e.g., bathymetry, shorelines, etc.); (B) Number, size and configuration of pens/structures; (C) Schedule of development and maintenance; (D) Species cultured; (E) Fish size at harvest; (F) Annual production; (G) Pounds of fish on hand throughout the year; (H) Average and maximum stocking density; (I) Source of eggs, juveniles, and broodstock; (J) Type of feed used; (K) Feeding method; (L) Chemical use (e.g., anti-fouling, antibiotics, etc.); and (M) Predator control measures. (iii) Provide county with documentation of adequate property damage and personal injury commercial insurance coverage as required by Washington Department of Natural Resources and other agencies. (iv) Where the county does not have expertise to analyze the merits of a report provided by an applicant, the applicant may be required to pay for third-party peer review of said report. (c) Bottom Sediments and Benthos. (i) The depth of water below the bottom of any in-water finfish aquaculture facility shall meet the minimum required by the 1986 Interim Guidelines (i.e., 20 to 60 feet at MLLW), as based on facility production capacity (Class I, II or III) and the mean current velocity at the site, measured as noted in the Guidelines or by more current data/methodology. (ii) In-water finfish aquaculture operations shall be prohibited where mean current velocity is less than 0.1 knots (five cm/sec). (iii) The pen configuration (e.g., parallel rows, compact blocks of square enclosures, or clusters of various sized round enclosures, whether oriented in line with or perpendicular to the prevailing current direction) of any in-water finfish aquaculture facility shall be designed and maintained to minimize the depth and lateral extent of solids accumulation. (iv) The use of unpelletized wet feed shall be prohibited to minimize undigested feed reaching the benthos or attracting scavengers in the water column. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 134/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (v) Anchoring or mooring systems shall utilize adequately sized helical devices or other methods to minimize disturbance to the benthos. (d) Water Quality. (i) All in-water finfish aquaculture facilities shall be designed, located and operated to avoid adverse impacts to water temperature, dissolved oxygen and nutrient levels, and other water quality parameters. Facilities must comply with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Standards (NPDES) requirements. (ii) All in-water finfish aquaculture facilities shall monitor water quality and net cleaning activities to comply with state requirements (including WAC 173-201A-210), especially during periods of naturally high water turbidity. Additional net cleaning activities shall be performed, as needed, to ensure state water quality standards are met. (e) Phytoplankton. (i) In-water finfish aquaculture facility production capacity shall be limited in nutrient sensitive areas to protect water quality and shall not exceed 1,000,000 pounds annual production per square nautical mile. The following shall apply for specific geographic areas: (A) In the main basin of Puget Sound (area south of the sill at Admiralty Inlet extending to the line between Tala Point and Foulweather Bluff, including Port Townsend Bay, Kilisut Harbor, and Oak Bay, and extending to the county’s boundary midway to Whidbey Island), annual production shall be limited by the site characteristics in compliance with this program. (ii) Applicants shall demonstrate through field and modeling studies that the proposed fish farms will not adversely affect existing biota. (f) Chemicals. (i) Only FDA-approved chemicals shall be allowed on a case-by-case basis for anti-fouling, predator control and other purposes. The use of tributyltin (TBT) is prohibited and all chemical use shall be reported to the state as required. (ii) When necessary, vaccination is preferred over the use of antibiotics. Only FDA-approved antibiotics shall be used and such use shall be reported to the state as required. Operator shall take all necessary precautions to ensure that nearby sediments and shellfish do not accumulate significant amounts of antibiotics. (g) Food Fish and Shellfish. (i) All in-water finfish aquaculture facilities shall be located to avoid adverse impacts to habitats of special significance (as defined in Article II of this chapter) and populations of food fish and shellfish as follows, as determined on a case-by-case basis: (A) When adjacent to any wildlife refuge, sanctuary, aquatic reserve or similar area intended to protect threatened or endangered species, locate a minimum of 300 feet in all directions from such protected areas; Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 135/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (B) When water depth is less than 75 feet, locate at least 300 feet down-current and 150 feet in all other directions from significant habitats; (C) When water depth is greater than 75 feet, locate at least 150 feet from significant habitat. (ii) The county shall designate protective buffer zones around habitats of special significance in accordance with marine area spatial planning efforts led by the state, when such guidance and methodologies are available. (h) Importation of New Fish Species. All in-water finfish aquaculture facilities shall comply with existing state and federal regulations to ensure importation of new and/or nonnative species does not adversely affect existing and/or native species. (i) Genetic Issues. (i) In compliance with state and federal requirements, in-water finfish aquaculture facilities that propose to culture species native to local waters should use stocks with the greatest genetic similarity to local stocks. (ii) When there is increased risk of interbreeding or establishment of naturalized populations of the cultured species that would be in conflict with native stocks, only sterile or mono-sexual fish shall be allowed. (iii) All in-water finfish aquaculture facilities shall locate a minimum distance from river mouths where wild fish could be most vulnerable to genetic degradation, as determined on a case-by- case basis or by state guidance. (j) Escapement and Disease. (i) All in-water finfish aquaculture facilities shall comply with state and federal requirements to control pests, parasites, diseases, viruses and pathogens and to prevent escapement including, but not limited to, those for certified eggs, approved import/transport and live fish transfer protocols, escapement prevention, reporting and recapture plans, and disease inspection and control per RCW 77.15.290, Chapter 77.115 RCW, Chapters 220-76 and 220-77 WAC and other requirements as appropriate. (ii) The use of regional broodstock is preferred. (iii) As consistent with the above mentioned Washington statutes and administrative rules, and other applicable authorities, all in-water finfish aquaculture facility operators shall provide the county with a disease response plan to detail specific actions and timelines to follow when an outbreak is detected. The plan shall address transport permit denial, quarantine, confiscation, removal, and other possible scenarios, identify what agencies will be notified or involved, what alternate facilities may be used, a public information/outreach strategy and other appropriate information. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 136/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (k) Marine Mammals and Birds. (i) All in-water finfish aquaculture facilities shall locate a minimum of 1,500 feet from habitats of special significance for marine mammals and seabirds. (ii) Only nonlethal techniques (e.g., anti-predator netting) shall be allowed to prevent predation by birds and/or mammals on the cultured stocks. (l) Visual Quality. All in-water finfish aquaculture facilities shall conduct a visual impact assessment to evaluate and document the following siting and design variables in order to minimize visual impacts to adjacent and surrounding uses: (i) Locate offshore from low bank shorelines rather than high bluff areas where angle of viewing becomes more perpendicular to the plane of water making the facility more visually evident. (ii) Locate offshore a minimum of 1,500 feet from ordinary high water mark, or a minimum of 2,000 feet when higher density residential development (rural residential 1:5, urban growth area, master planned resort, and preexisting platted subdivisions with density equivalent/greater to such) is present along the adjacent upland. The county may require a greater distance as determined by a visual impact assessment. (iii) Facilities shall be designed to maximize a horizontal profile to repeat the plane of the water surface rather than project vertically above the water surface. Vertical height shall be the minimum feasible, not to exceed 10 feet from the surface of the water. (iv) Facilities shall be designed so that the overall size and surface area coverage does not exceed 10 percent of the normal cone of vision, dependent on the foreshortening created by the offshore distance and the average observation height. (v) Facilities shall be designed to borrow from the form of structures and materials already in the environment (e.g., pilings, docks, marinas) and to blend with the predominate color schemes present (i.e., blue, green, gray, neutral earth tones). The colors of white and black shall be minimized as they have highly variable appearance in response to lighting conditions. Bright colors such as red, yellow, and orange shall be avoided, unless required for safety purposes. The use of a variety of materials or colors shall be limited and ordered. (vi) Facilities proposed to locate in the vicinity of existing in-water finfish aquaculture facilities shall evaluate the aggregate impacts and cumulative effects of multiple operations in the same area. (vii) Facilities shall be designed and located so that the surface area of individual operations does not exceed two acres of surface coverage and no more than one operation per square nautical mile. (viii) Land based access for parking, staging, launching, and storage associated with any in- water finfish aquaculture facilities shall be evaluated for visual impacts and conflicts with adjacent upland uses. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 137/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (m) Navigation, Military Operations and Commercial Fishing. (i) When appropriate, in-water finfish aquaculture facilities shall be located close to shore and near existing navigational impediments (i.e., marinas, docks). (ii) All in-water finfish aquaculture facilities shall be designed, located and operated to avoid conflict with military operations. (iii) The county shall notify, as appropriate, marinas, ports, recreational and commercial boating/fishing organizations, and local tribes about comment opportunities during the permit review process, especially regarding proposed location of fish farm and related navigational aids. (n) Human Health. All in-water finfish aquaculture facilities shall be designed, located and operated to: (i) Ensure adequate water quality compatible with good husbandry practices; (ii) Report any known bacteriological characteristics of fish food used; (iii) Ensure proper storage of fish food to avoid alteration or degradation of feed quality; (iv) Regularly monitor and report presence of parasites in farmed fish; and (v) Comply with federal, state and local food safety requirements including, but not limited to, source identification and country of origin labeling, and hazard analysis and critical control points plan. (o) Recreation. (i) All in-water finfish aquaculture facilities shall ensure compliance with state and federal requirements, especially when location is proposed near underwater park facilities. (ii) All in-water finfish aquaculture facilities shall be located a minimum of 1,000 feet from any recreational shellfish beach, public tidelands, public access facilities (e.g., docks or boat ramps) or other areas of extensive or established recreational use. (iii) In-water finfish aquaculture operators shall inform the Notice to Mariners and other appropriate entities for nautical chart revisions and notify other sources that inform recreational uses (e.g., boaters, divers, shellfish harvesters). (p) Noise. (i) All in-water finfish aquaculture facilities shall be designed, located and operated to: (A) Ensure compliance with state and federal noise level limits; (B) Require mufflers and enclosures on all motorized fish farm equipment; (C) When appropriate, prefer electric motors over internal combustion engines. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 138/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (ii) The county may require an acoustical study, conducted at the applicant’s/operator’s expense, to ensure any audible impacts are identified and adequately addressed. (q) Odor. All in-water finfish aquaculture facilities shall be designed, located and operated to: (i) Ensure compliance with state limits regarding nuisances and waste disposal; (ii) Follow best management practices including, but not limited to: (A) Daily removal and disposal of dead fish and other waste; (B) Regular cleaning of nets and apparatus; (C) Storage of food in closed containers; (D) Walkway design and use allows spilled food to fall into the water. (iii) Maximize the distance between the facility and nearby residential use/development, downwind location preferred, to minimize impacts resulting from foul odors. (r) Lighting and Glare. (i) Facilities shall comply with USCG requirements for operational and navigational lighting. The height of the light source above the water surface shall be the minimum necessary, not to exceed 80 inches, unless otherwise specified by state or federal requirements. (ii) Facilities shall be designed so that any glare or shadows caused by the solar orientation are minimized. (iii) Facilities shall utilize materials that minimize glare caused by sunlight or artificial lighting. (s) Upland Shoreline Use. All in-water finfish aquaculture facilities shall be designed, located and operated to minimize incompatible uses and degradation of upland area. (t) Local Services. (i) All in-water finfish aquaculture facilities shall be designed, located and operated to: (A) Provide estimates of high, average, and low volumes of waste to be produced, including catastrophic events; (B) Provide a waste management plan to include the method and frequency of collection, storage and disposal; and (C) Ensure compliance with local, state, federal waste disposal requirements. (ii) Equipment, structures and materials shall not be discarded in the water and shall not be abandoned in the upland. (6) Regulations – Geoduck. (a) Conditional use permits. Commented [LG91]: 2011 b Periodic Checklist Commented [GU92]: AJS: Requirements for CUP for new commercial geoduck aquaculture added per WAC 173-26- 241(3)(b)(iv)(A) Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 139/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (i) CUPs are required for new commercial geoduck aquaculture. Where the applicant proposes to convert existing nongeoduck aquaculture to commercial geoduck aquaculture, a conditional use permit is only required if the conversion includes an increase of more than 25% of either the in-water or above-OHWM operations area or facilities. If the expansion exceeds 25%, the entire operation shall be considered new aquaculture and shall be subject to applicable permit requirements of this section. required. (ii) All subsequent cycles of planting and harvest shall not require a new conditional use permit unless a specific project or practice would substantially interfere with normal public use of the surface waters, including public access or passage, and was not considered during review or approval of the original conditional use permit. (iii) A single conditional use permit may be submitted for multiple sites within an inlet, bay or other defined feature, provided the sites are all under control of the same applicant and within the same shoreline permitting jurisdiction. (iv) The CUP issued by the county shall include monitoring and reporting requirements necessary to verify that geoduck aquaculture operations are in compliance with shoreline limits and conditions set forth in the CUP and to support cumulative impacts analysis. (v) The county shall review the considerations listed in WAC 173-26-241(3)(b)(iv)(L)(I)-(XII) during development of permit conditions necessary to avoid or limit impacts from geoduck aquaculture siting and operations and to achieve no net loss of ecological functions. The listed considerations are regarding impervious materials, motorized vehicles, time periods for limited activities, site alterations, property corner markers, mitigation measures, predator exclusion devices, turbidity minimization, use of barges/vessels, navigation rights, housekeeping practices, and public access. (b) Siting and design. In addition to the siting provisions of subsections (4)(f) and (g), commercial geoduck aquaculture should only be allowed where sediments, topography, and land and water access support geoduck aquaculture operations without significant clearing or grading. (7) Regulations – Application Requirements. (a) Prior to issuing a permit for any proposed aquaculture use or development, the county may require copies of permit applications and/or studies required by state and federal agencies to (a) To ensure provisions of this program are met, including, but not limited to,applicants must submit the following information: (i) Anticipated(i) A baseline ecological survey of the proposed site to allow consideration of the ecological effects. (ii) A narrative description and timeline of anticipated planting and harvest cycles and potential plans for future expansion or change in species grown or harvest practices. (iiiii) Number, types and dimensions of structures, apparatus or equipment. (iiiiv) Predator control methods. Commented [GU93]: AJS: Modifications made to address application requirements for geoduck. These seemed like appropriate requirements for all aquaculture, so integrated into this existing section. See WAC 13-26-241(3)(b)(iv)(F) Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 140/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (ivv) Anticipated levels of noise, light, and odor and plans for minimizing their impacts. (vvi) Potential impacts to animals, plants, and water quality due to the discharge of waste water from any upland development. (vi(vii) Measures to achieve no net loss of ecological functions consistent with the mitigation sequence described in WAC-173-26-201 (2)(e). (viii) Management practices that address impacts from mooring, parking, noise, lights, litter, and other activities associated with operations. (ix) Proof of application for an aquatic lands lease from the Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) or proof of lease or ownership if bedlands are privately held. (viix) Department of Health (DOH) Shellfish Certification Number. (viiixi) Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFWWDFW) commercial aquatic farm or noncommercial, personal consumption designation. (ixxii) Proof of application for any permits required by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Health, or other agency. (xxiii) Proof of application for any state and federal permits/approvals including any required federal consultation under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq., ESA). (b(b) To reduce redundancy, applicants are encouraged to submit supporting permit applications and studies required by state and federal agencies to provide the information required by the county in subsection (a). The county may require submittal of these materials. (c) Prior to approving a permit for floating/hanging or upland aquaculture use and development or bottom culture involving structures, the county may require a visual analysis prepared by the applicant/proponent describing effects on nearby uses and aesthetic qualities of the shoreline. including what views in the vicinity would be altered or obstructed, such as public access views and views from substantial numbers of private residences, and proposed measures to reduce impacts. The analysis shall demonstrate that adverse impacts on the character of those areas are effectively mitigated. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VIII § 2)] 18.25.450 Commercial use. (1) Policies. (a) Commercial development should be located, designed and operated to avoid and minimize adverse impacts on shoreline ecological functions and processes. (b) Water-related commercial uses should not displace existing water-dependent uses, and water- enjoyment commercial uses should not displace existing water-related or existing water-dependent uses, unless there are compelling reasons in the public interest. (c) Restoration of impaired shoreline ecological functions and processes should be encouraged as part of commercial development. Commented [LG94]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 141/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (d) Commercial development should be visually compatible with adjacent noncommercial properties. (e) Commercial uses located in the shoreline should provide public access in accordance with JCC 18.25.290 (Public access). (2) Uses and Activities Prohibited Outright. Commercial parking as a primary use shall be prohibited within the shoreline jurisdiction. (3) Shoreline Environment Regulations. (a) Priority Aquatic. Commercial use and development is prohibited, except that small-scale, low intensity water-dependent commercial recreational use and development may be allowed as a conditional use subject to the use and development regulations of the abutting upland shoreline environment designation. (b) Aquatic. Water-dependent and water-related commercial recreational use and development may be allowed subject to the use and development regulations of the abutting upland shoreline environment designation. Water-enjoyment and non-water-dependent commercial use/development is prohibited. (c) Natural. Commercial use and development is prohibited, except that small-scale, low intensity water-dependent commercial recreational use and development may be allowed through a conditional use permit. (d) Conservancy. Water-dependent and water-related commercial use and development may be allowed as a conditional use subject to policies and regulations of this program. Non-water- dependent and non-water-related commercial uses/developments are prohibited, except that small-scale, low intensity recreational/tourist development/use may be allowed with a conditional use permit; provided, that a portion of the use/development is water-dependent or water-related. (e) Shoreline Residential. Water-oriented commercial use and development may be allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program. Non-water-oriented commercial uses may be allowed as a conditional use. (f) High Intensity. Water-oriented commercial use and development may be allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program. Non-water-oriented commercial uses may be allowed as a conditional use. (4) Regulations – Application Requirements. (a) The county shall require proponents of all commercial use and development to provide the following information at the time of permit application: (i) Site plans showing the boundaries of the property and any existing structures, indication of existing vegetation and topography, locations of adjacent structures, roads or other infrastructure, and the ordinary high water mark and/or floodway boundary. For comparison, proposed structures and uses shall be overlaid on a site plan of existing conditions; and Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 142/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (ii) A description of the specific nature and character of the commercial activity (e.g., water- dependent, water-related, water-enjoyment, non-water-oriented, or mixed-use), including a description of the specific components of the proposal; and (iii) A description of the reason for needing a shoreline location; and (iv) Any proposed measures to enhance the relationship of the activity to the shoreline; and (v) A description of the proposed provisions for providing public visual and/or physical access to the shoreline; and (vi) A description of mitigation measures proposed to ensure that the development will not cause significant adverse environmental impacts. (b) For mixed-use proposals, at least one alternative design depicting a mixture of uses and activities, structural location, site design, bulk and dimensional configuration, and an alternative approach to public visual and physical access to the shoreline. (5) Regulations – Water-oriented Use/Development. (a) Water-oriented commercial use and development shall be allowed when the proponent demonstrates that it will not result in a net loss of shoreline ecological functions or processes, or have significant adverse impact on other shoreline uses, resources and/or values such as navigation, recreation and public access. (b) A use or development shall not be considered water-dependent, water-related or water- enjoyment until the county determines that the proposed design, layout and operation of the use/development meet the definition and intent of the water-dependent, water-related or water- enjoyment designation. (c) Where existing water-oriented commercial uses are located in shoreline jurisdiction, any undeveloped and substantially unaltered portion of the waterfront not devoted to water- dependent use shall be maintained for future water-related use. (6) Regulations – Non-Water-Oriented Use/Development. (a) Non-water-oriented commercial uses are prohibited on the shoreline unless they meet the following criteria: (i) The use is part of a mixed-use project that includes water-dependent uses and provides a significant public benefit with respect to the Shoreline Management Act’s objectives such as providing public access and ecological restoration; or (ii) Navigability is severely limited at the proposed site and the commercial use provides a significant public benefit with respect to the Shoreline Management Act’s objectives such as providing public access and ecological restoration. (b) When permitted pursuant to subsection (5)(a) of this section, non-water-oriented uses shall provide public access and/or restore shoreline ecological functions as follows: Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 143/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (i) When part of a mixed-use development, 80 percent of the shoreline buffer area shall be restored to provide shoreline ecological functions and processes that approximate the functions provided by the site in undisturbed or nondegraded conditions. (ii) When not part of a mixed-use development, the county shall determine the type and extent of public access and restoration on a case-by-case basis according to the opportunities and constraints provided by the site. (c) The county may waive the requirement to provide public access and/or restoration when: (i) The site is designated as a public access area by a shoreline public access plan, in which case public access consistent with that plan element shall be provided; or (ii) The county finds that the size of the parcel and/or the presence of adjacent uses preclude restoration of shoreline ecological functions. In such cases, where on-site restoration is infeasible, equivalent off-site restoration shall be provided consistent with the policies and regulations of this program. (d) Where restoration is provided pursuant to this section, buffers protecting the restored area shall be sized and designed as appropriate to protect shoreline resources based on a specific restoration plan. The buffer width may differ from the shoreline buffers required in JCC 18.25.270 so as not to encumber adjacent properties, unduly constrain the development site, or create a disincentive for restoration. (e) Existing non-water-dependent and non-water-related commercial use or development on shorelines that conform to this program may be permitted to expand landward, but not waterward of existing structures, provided the expansion otherwise conforms to this program. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VIII § 3)] (f) Scientific and educational facilities, including those for maritime education and training, and public uses not otherwise specified in Table 18.25.220, shall comply with all applicable provisions for commercial use. 18.25.460 Forest practices. (1) Policies. (a) To be consistent with WAC 173-26-241(3)(e), the county should rely on the Forest Practices Act (Chapter 76.09 RCW), its implementing rules, and the 1999 Forest and Fish Report as adequate management of commercial forest uses within shoreline jurisdiction, except for forest conversion activities. (b) Forest lands should be reserved for long-term forest management and other such uses that are compatible with forest management. (c) Forest practices should maintain natural surface and ground water movement patterns and protect the quality of surface and ground water. (d) Forest practices should minimize damage to fish and wildlife species and terrestrial, wetland, and aquatic habitats. Commented [LG95]: Task Force D Marine Trades - maritime education added to definition of scientific and educational facilities. Also Staff Docket/Code Interpretations There was no use matrix reference. Example agencies treat similar to commercial (e.g. Pacific County). Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 144/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (e) Forest practices should aim to maintain or improve the quality of soils and minimize erosion. (f) Where slopes are steep or soils are subject to sliding, erosion or high water table, special practices should be employed to minimize damage to shoreland and water bodies, and adjacent properties. (g) Forest practices should be conducted in a manner that minimizes adverse effects on the aesthetic qualities of shorelines. (h) Proper road and bridge design, location, and construction and maintenance practices should be used to prevent adversely affecting shoreline resources. (2) Uses and Activities Prohibited Outright. Forest practices below ordinary high water mark on all shorelines are prohibited. (3) Shoreline Environment Regulations. (a) Priority Aquatic. Forest practices are prohibited. (b) Aquatic. Forest practices are prohibited. (c) Natural. Forest practices may be allowed with conditional use approval, subject to the policies and regulations of this program. (d) Conservancy. Forest practices may be allowed subject to the policies and regulations of this program. (e) Shoreline Residential. Forest practices may be allowed subject to the policies and regulations of this program. (f) High Intensity. Forest practices may be allowed subject to the policies and regulations of this program. (4) Regulations. (a) Timber harvesting and forest practices activities that do not meet the definition of development in Article II of this chapter shall be conducted in accordance with the Washington State Forest Practices Act (Chapter 76.09 RCW), WAC Title 222, and the 1999 Forest and Fish Report, and any regulations adopted pursuant thereto. (b) Except as provided in subsections (4)(c) and (d) of this section, timber harvesting and forest practices activities that do not meet the definition of development in Article II of this chapter shall not be regulated by this program and shall not require a shoreline permit. A forest practice that only involves timber cutting is not a development under the act and does not require a shoreline substantial development permit or a shoreline exemption. A forest practice that includes activities other than timber cutting may be a development under the act and may require a substantial development permit, as required by WAC 222-50-020. (c) Selective commercial timber cutting on shorelines of statewide significance shall not exceed 30 percent of the merchantable trees in any 10-year period as required by RCW 90.58.150. The county Commented [LG96]: 2017 e Periodic Checklist Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 145/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. may allow exceptions to the 30 percent limit with a conditional use permit in accordance with WAC 173-26-241(3)(e). (d) Forest practices roads on slopes that exceed 35 percent shall require a conditional use permit. (e) Other activities associated with timber harvesting, such as filling, excavation, and building roads and structures, that meet the definition of development shall be regulated according to the general provisions (Article VI of this chapter), shoreline modification provisions (Article VII of this chapter) and/or the other applicable use-specific provisions (this article) of this program and shall require a shoreline substantial development permit or conditional use permit as specified in this program. (f) Conversion of forest land to nonforestry uses (Class IV Conversion Forest Practices Permit) shall be reviewed in accordance with the provisions for the proposed nonforestry use and the general provisions in Article VI of this chapter and shall be subject to any permit requirements associated with the nonforestry use. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VIII § 4)] 18.25.470 Industrial and port development. (1) Policies. (a) In securing shoreline locations for industrial or port development, preference should be given first to water-dependent industrial or port development, then to water-related industrial or port development. (b) Restoration of impaired shoreline ecological functions and processes should be encouraged as part of industrial and port development. (c) Industrial and port development should be visually compatible with adjacent noncommercial properties. (d) Industrial and port uses located in shoreline jurisdiction should provide public access in accordance with JCC 18.25.290 (Public access). (e) Shorelines suitable for deep-water harbors with access to adequate rail, highway and utility systems should be reserved for water-dependent or water-related industrial and port development. (f) Port facilities should be designed to allow the public to view harbor areas and should provide public facilities that do not interfere with port operations or endanger public health and safety. (g) Where feasible, transportation and utility corridors serving industrial and port uses should be located away from the water’s edge to minimize ecological impacts and to reduce the need for waterfront signs and other infrastructure. (h) Industrial or port development at deep-water sites should be limited to those uses that produce long-term economic benefit and minimize environmental impact. (i) Industrial and port development should be protected from encroachment or interference by incompatible uses such as residential or commercial uses, which have less stringent siting requirements. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 146/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (j) Private and public entities should be encouraged to cooperatively use piers, cargo handling, storage, parking and other accessory facilities in waterfront industrial/port areas. (k) Log storage is not a desired use of the county’s shoreline and should be allowed only when adequate measures are taken to minimize adverse impacts. Upland log storage is preferred over in- water storage. (2) Shoreline Environment Regulations. (a) Priority Aquatic. Industrial/port use and development are prohibited. (b) Aquatic. Water-dependent and water-related industrial/port use and development may be allowed as a conditional use, subject to the use and development regulations of the abutting upland shoreline environment designation. Uses and developments that are not water-dependent or water-related are prohibited. (c) Natural. Industrial/port use and development are prohibited. (d) Conservancy. Only low intensity water-dependent and water-related industrial/port use and development may be allowed as a conditional use, subject to policies and regulations of this program. Uses and developments that are not water-dependent or water-related are prohibited, except that industrial/port use and development that meet the criteria in subsection (5)(a) of this section may be allowed as a conditional use. (e) Shoreline Residential. Only low intensity water-dependent and water-related industrial/port use and development may be allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program. Uses and developments that are not water-dependent or water-related are prohibited, except that industrial/port use and development that meet the criteria in subsection (5)(a) of this section may be allowed as a conditional use. (f) High Intensity. Water-dependent and water-related industrial/port use and development may be allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program. Uses and developments that are not water-dependent or water-related may be allowed as a conditional use. (3) Regulations – General. (a) Where industrial and port use/development is allowed, it shall be located, designed, and constructed in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts to shoreline resources and shall include mitigation to ensure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions and processes. (b) Accessory development that does not require a location at or near the water’s edge shall be located upland of the water-dependent portions of the development and outside the shoreline buffer. (c) Industrial noise caused by volume, frequency, or rhythm shall be muffled or otherwise controlled. Tsunami, air raid and other public safety warning sirens are exempt from this requirement. No vibration shall be permitted that is discernible without instruments on any adjoining non-industrial/port property. The county may require an acoustical study, vibration assessment, and mitigation as needed to address potential noise or vibration impacts. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 147/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (d) Industrial and port facilities shall minimize direct or reflected glare and noxious odors discernible without instruments from adjacent properties, streets, or water areas, and must comply with Olympic Region Clean Air Agency (ORCAA) standards. (e) Docks, piers, pilings and launching facilities accessory to industrial and port development may be permitted; provided, that they serve a water-dependent or water-related use, and comply with JCC 18.25.350 (boating facilities). (f) Storage or disposal of industrial and port wastes shall be prohibited within shoreline jurisdiction. (g) Non-water-dependent industrial/port uses may be permitted to occur at facilities previously approved for water-dependent uses under the following conditions: (i) A specific occupancy plan has been approved that allows interim uses for a specific period while the market for water-dependent uses is being developed and the proposed interim use is consistent with the occupancy plan. (ii) The period of interim lease or commitment of the space shall not exceed five years. At the end of five years, a new application for interim use shall be submitted. (iii) The proponent/applicant has made a good faith effort to obtain water-dependent uses. The period of the search for water-dependent uses, the notice of availability, listing or advertising employed, and any inquiries received shall be documented. (iv) No permanent improvements will be made to the space that require more than five years of occupancy to repay the investment. No permanent improvements will be made that will reduce the suitability of the space for water-dependent use. (4) Regulations – Water-oriented Use/Development. (a) Water-oriented industrial/port use and development shall be allowed when the proponent/applicant demonstrates that it will not cause a net loss of shoreline ecological functions or processes or have significant adverse impact on other shoreline uses, resources and/or values such as navigation, recreation and public access. (b) A use or development shall not be considered water-dependent, water-related or water- enjoyment until the county determines that the proposed design, layout and operation of the use/development meet the definition and intent of the water-dependent, water-related or water- enjoyment designation. (c) Where existing water-oriented industrial/port uses are located in shoreline jurisdiction, any undeveloped and substantially unaltered portion of the waterfront not devoted to water- dependent use shall be maintained for future water-related use. (d) Water-dependent industry and port facilities shall be located and designed to minimize the need for initial or recurrent dredging, filling or other harbor and channel maintenance activities. (5) Regulations – Non-water-oriented Use/Development. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 148/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (a) Non-water-oriented industrial/port uses are prohibited in shoreline jurisdiction unless they meet the following criteria: (i) The site is physically separated from the shoreline by another property or public right-of- way; or (ii) The use is part of a mixed-use project that includes an associated water-dependent use; or (iii) Navigability is severely limited at the proposed site; or (iv) The industrial/port use provides a significant public benefit in the form of public access and/or ecological restoration. (b) When permitted pursuant to subsection (5)(a) of this section, non-water-oriented uses shall provide public access and/or restore shoreline ecological functions. The county shall determine the type and extent of public access and restoration on a case-by-case basis according to the opportunities and constraints provided by the site. (c) The county may waive the requirement to provide public access and/or restoration when: (i) The site is designated as a public access area by a shoreline public access plan, in which case public access consistent with that plan element shall be provided; or (ii) The county finds that the size of the parcel and/or the presence of adjacent uses preclude restoration of shoreline ecological functions. In such cases, where on-site restoration is infeasible, equivalent off-site restoration shall be provided consistent with the policies and regulations of this program. (d) Where restoration is provided pursuant to this section, buffers on the restored area shall be designed as appropriate to protect shoreline resources based on a specific restoration plan. The buffer width may differ from the shoreline buffers required in JCC 18.25.270 so as not to encumber adjacent properties or unduly constrain the development site. (e) Existing non-water-dependent and non-water-related industrial/port development on shorelines that conforms to this program may be permitted to expand landward, but not waterward of existing structures provided the expansion otherwise conforms to this program. (6) Regulations – Log Storage. (a) In-water storage or rafting of logs is prohibited unless all of the following conditions are met: (i) There is no feasible upland location; and (ii) State water quality standards can be met at all times; and (iii) The storage does not create an impediment to navigation or interfere with other water- dependent uses; and (iv) The storage occurs in deep water beyond the photic zone to reduce shading impacts; and (v) Overland transportation of logs would cause unacceptable transportation impacts; and Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 149/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (vi) Depths are sufficient to prevent grounding; and (vii) Easy let-down devices are employed for placing logs in the water. Free-fall or dumping of logs into water shall be prohibited. (b) Dredging to create log storage facilities shall be prohibited. (c) Log storage facilities shall be located in existing developed areas to the greatest extent feasible. If a new log storage facility is proposed along an undeveloped shoreline, an alternatives analysis shall be required. (d) Existing in-water log storage facilities in habitats used by federally listed threatened or endangered species shall be reevaluated if use is discontinued for two years or more or if substantial repair or reconstruction is required. (e) Offshore log storage shall only be allowed on a temporary basis, and should be located where natural tidal or current flushing and water circulation are adequate to disperse potential contaminants/pollutants. (f) Appropriate bark and wood debris control, collection and disposal methods shall be employed at log storage areas, log dumps, raft building areas and mill-side handling zones to prevent wood debris from entering the water. (g) Where water depths will permit the floating of bundled logs, they shall be secured in bundles on land before being placed in the water. Bundles shall not be broken again except on land or at mill- side. (7) Regulations – Ship Building and Repair Yard Regulations. (a) Ship and boat building and repair yards shall employ best management practices to control, collect and treat surface runoff to protect the quality of affected waters in accordance with Chapter 90.48 RCW. (b) Cleaning, surfacing or resurfacing operations occurring over water that may result in the entry of debris into water shall employ fully intact tarps temporarily affixed to the hull above the water line. Prior to removing the tarps, the accumulated contents shall be removed and properly disposed of. (c) Impervious pavement is required for ship building and repair yards where the wet season water table is less than four feet below surface level. (8) Regulations – Application Requirements. The county shall require proponents of all industrial use and development to provide the following information at the time of permit application: (a) Site plans showing the boundaries of the property and any existing structures, indication of existing vegetation and topography, locations of adjacent structures, roads or other infrastructure, and the ordinary high water mark and/or floodway boundary. For comparison, proposed structures and uses shall be overlaid on a site plan of existing conditions; and Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 150/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (b) A description of the specific nature and character of the industrial activity (e.g., water- dependent or water-related), including a description of the specific components of the proposal; and (c) A description of the reason for needing a shoreline location; and (d) Any proposed measures to enhance the relationship of the activity to the shoreline; and (e) A description of the proposed provisions for providing public visual and physical access to the shoreline; and (f) A description of potential noise impacts including an acoustical analysis; and (g) A description of mitigation measures including screening, fencing, and other measures to ensure that the development will not cause significant adverse environmental impacts. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VIII § 5)] 18.25.480 Mining. (1) Policies. (a) Mining, as defined in Article II of this chapter, should be located and conducted so as to provide long-term protection of water quality, fish and wildlife species and habitat, to cause the least amount of disruption to the natural shoreline character, resources and ecology, and to avoid net loss of ecological functions in accordance with this program and other applicable laws. (b) Mining should not be located and conducted where unavoidable adverse impacts to other uses or resources equal or outweigh the benefits from mining. (c) Mining should not interfere with public access or recreation on the shoreline. (d) Mining should only be permitted when the proponent provides appropriate studies and detailed operation plans demonstrating all of the following: (i) Fish habitat, upland habitat and water quality will not be adversely affected; (ii) The operation will not adversely affect geo-hydraulic processes, channel alignment, nor increase bank erosion or flood damages; (iii) The operation will provide all feasible measures to protect aquatic resources and anadromous fisheries from pollution related to mining including, but not limited to, sedimentation and siltation; chemical and petrochemical use and spillage, and storage or disposal of wastes and spoils. (e) Mining operations should be located, designed, and managed so that adjoining properties do not experience adverse impacts from noise, dust or other effects of the operation. The mine operator should be required to implement mitigation measures to minimize adverse proximity impacts. (f) Mining proposals that result in the creation, restoration, or enhancement of habitat for priority species are preferred over proposals that do not create or improve priority habitat. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 151/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (2) Uses and Activities Prohibited Outright. Commercial and industrial extraction and processing of quarry rock, sand, gravel, cobbles or other minerals along any marine or freshwater lake shoreline, or waterward of the ordinary high water mark on any stream/river shoreline, are prohibited. (3) Shoreline Environment Regulations. (a) Priority Aquatic. Mining use and development are prohibited. (b) Aquatic. Mining use and development are prohibited. (c) Natural. Mining use and development are prohibited, except for transportation of minerals by road. (d) Conservancy. Mining use and development are prohibited, except for transportation of minerals by road. (e) Shoreline Residential. Mining use and development are prohibited, except for transportation of minerals by road. (f) High Intensity. Mining use and development may be allowed as a conditional use (CUP). (4) Regulations. (a) All mining activities shall be conducted to ensure compliance with the Washington State Surface Mining Act (Chapter 78.44 RCW), with JCC 18.20.240, 18.30.070, and 18.40.073, and with the no net loss provisions of this program. (b) As defined in Article II of this chapter, the regulations contained in this section shall apply to all mining operations, including the extraction, primary processing and transport of naturally occurring materials. For the purposes of this section, primary processing shall be construed to include screening, crushing, and stockpiling of materials removed from the site where the processing activity is located. Transport of minerals shall include conveyor systems and barge terminals that are specifically dedicated to transport of mined materials from the site to the marketplace. (c) No material (such as mining overburden, debris and tailings) or equipment shall be placed in water bodies, critical areas, or floodways and shall be stored so as to prevent erosion or seepage to surface and ground waters. (d) To minimize noise, dust, vibration, glare and other adverse impacts, a buffer of at least 100 feet wide shall be maintained between any mining site, including accessory facilities, and adjacent properties not used for mining operations. The buffer shall consist of undisturbed soils and native vegetation and shall only include land owned or leased by the mine operator. (e) The proposed subsequent use of reclaimed mined property shall be consistent with the provisions of the environment designation in which the property is located and that reclamation of disturbed shoreline areas shall provide appropriate ecological processes and functions consistent with the setting. Approved reclamation programs shall be initiated within 60 days following the completion of the mineral extraction operations, in consultation with Washington Department of Natural Resources. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 152/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (f) Equipment or apparatus associated with mining operations such as machinery, machine parts, filters, grease and oil containers and rope shall be removed in a timely manner to an appropriate upland location. Proposals for mineral extraction and processing shall be accompanied by a report prepared by a licensed professional geotechnical engineer that includes a description of all of the following: (i) Types of materials present on the site; (ii) Quantity and quality of each material; (iii) Lateral extent and depth of mineral deposits; (iv) Depth of overburden and proposed depth of mining; (v) Cross section diagrams indicating present and proposed elevations and/or extraction levels; (vi) Existing drainage patterns, seasonal or continuous, and proposed alterations to drainage patterns; (vii) Proposed means of controlling surface runoff and preventing or minimizing erosion and sedimentation; (viii) The location and sensitivity of any affected flood hazard areas; (ix) The overall mineral extraction and processing plan, including scheduling, seasonal changes in activity levels, and daily operation schedules; (x) Proposed screening, buffering or fencing plans consistent with the requirements of this program; (xi) Anticipated impacts to aquatic and riparian habitat; measures to mitigate or offset adverse impacts; and (xii) A proposed reclamation plan that, at a minimum, meets the requirements of Chapter 78.44 RCW. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VIII § 6)] 18.25.490 Recreation. (1) Policies. (a) Public recreation on public lands is a preferred use of the shoreline. Recreational uses and developments that facilitate the public’s ability to reach, touch, and enjoy the water’s edge, to travel on the waters of the state, and to view the water and the shoreline are preferred. Where appropriate, such facilities should be dispersed along the shoreline in a manner that supports more frequent recreational access and aesthetic enjoyment of the shoreline for a substantial number of people. (b) Jefferson County should develop a comprehensive shoreline public access plan in collaboration with federal, state, and local organizations whose missions include facilitating public access and recreation opportunities. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 153/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (c) Recreational use and development should facilitate appropriate use of shoreline resources while also conserving them. (d) Linkages between shoreline parks, recreation areas and public access points with linear systems (e.g., water trails, hiking paths, bicycle paths, easements and/or scenic drives) should be provided where feasible. (e) Recreation facilities should incorporate adequate orientation information and public education regarding shoreline ecological functions and processes, the effect of human actions on the environment and the importance of public involvement in shoreline management. Opportunities to incorporate educational and interpretive information should be pursued in design and operation of recreation facilities and other amenities such as nature trails. (f) Recreational use and development should be supported by adequate utility and road facilities, or located where such facilities may be provided without significant damage to shore features commensurate with the number and concentration of anticipated users. (g) The county should encourage the use of street ends and publicly owned lands for shoreline public access to and development of recreational opportunities. (h) Recreation use and development should be located and designed in a manner that is compatible with the surrounding properties. (i) Recreational developments are encouraged to use low impact development techniques including but not limited to pervious pavements, to minimize effects associated with stormwater runoff. (2) Shoreline Environment Regulations. (a) Priority Aquatic. Water-oriented recreational use and development is allowed subject to the regulations of the abutting upland shoreline environment designation. Underwater parks may be allowed as a conditional use. Non-water-oriented recreation is prohibited. (b) Aquatic. Water-oriented recreational use and development is allowed subject to the regulations of the abutting upland shoreline environment designation. Underwater parks may be allowed as a conditional use. Non-water-oriented recreation is prohibited. (c) Natural. Non-water-oriented recreation is prohibited. Low intensity water-oriented recreational use and development may be allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program and the following criteria: (i) Essential minor structures such as trails, stairs, small picnic areas, primitive roads, viewpoints, restrooms or other appropriate sanitary facilities, interpretive facilities, or development that will not adversely affect shoreline ecological functions and processes are permitted, subject to policies and regulations of this master program. (ii) Any necessary landscaping shall use native vegetation. (iii) Recreational development requiring extensive structures or substantial alterations to topography or native vegetation is prohibited. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 154/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (d) Conservancy. Non-water-oriented recreation is prohibited. Low intensity water-oriented recreational use and development is allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program and the following criteria: (i) Structures on sites of one acre or less shall not result in more than five percent building coverage, and total impervious surface shall not exceed 10 percent. (ii) Structures on sites greater than one acre will not result in more than 10 percent building coverage, and total impervious surface will not exceed 20 percent. (iii) Alteration of topography shall be limited to the minimum necessary to accommodate allowed use and development. (iv) Recreational use and development will not result in visitor patterns that degrade shoreline ecological functions. (e) Shoreline Residential. Water-oriented recreational use and development is allowed subject to the policies and regulations of this master program. Non-water-oriented recreation may be allowed as a conditional use. (f) High Intensity. Water-oriented recreational use and development is allowed subject to the policies and regulations of this master program. Non-water-oriented recreation is prohibited. (3) Regulations. (a) Water-oriented recreational use/development is a preferred use of the shoreline and shall be allowed when the proponent demonstrates that it will not result in a net loss of shoreline ecological functions or processes or have significant adverse impact on other shoreline uses, resources and/or values such as navigation and public access. (b) Recreation areas or facilities on the shoreline shall provide physical or visual public access consistent with JCC 18.25.290 (Public access). (c) Underwater parks may be permitted when properly sited and associated with adequate access, restroom facilities and parking. Underwater parks should be located adjacent to existing parks where feasible. (d) Non-water-oriented recreational facilities with playing fields or with extensive impervious surfaces are not preferred, and if permitted shall incorporate best management practices (BMPs) to prevent erosion, control the amount of runoff and prevent harmful concentrations of chemicals and sediment from entering water bodies. (e) New recreational use/development shall be located landward of the shoreline buffers required by this program except that components of the recreational use or development that are water- dependent or water-related may be allowed within the shoreline buffer. (f) Signs indicating the public’s right to access shoreline areas shall be installed and maintained in conspicuous locations at recreational facility points of access and entrances. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 155/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (g) When a public recreation site abuts private property/tidelands, signs and other similar markers shall also indicate geographic limits of public access to minimize conflicts with adjacent use/development. (h) Where appropriate, recreational development proposals shall include provisions for nonmotorized access to the shoreline (e.g., pedestrian, water access and bicycle paths). (i) Proposals for recreational use and development that involve any clearing, grading or impervious surface shall include a landscape plan that uses species approved by the county. Native, self- sustaining vegetation shall be used as often as possible. The removal of on-site native vegetation shall be limited to the minimum necessary for the development of campsites, selected viewpoints or other permitted structures or facilities and shall be subject to JCC 18.25.310 (Vegetation conservation). (j) Proposals for recreational development shall include adequate facilities for water supply, sewage and garbage disposal, and recycling commensurate with the intensity of the proposed use. Remotely located sites shall encourage visitors to implement best management practices (BMPs) such as the tread lightly and leave no trace principles of low impact recreation. (k) Recreational use and development shall incorporate appropriate mitigation to minimize light and noise impacts on adjoining land uses. Such measures shall include, but not be limited to, fencing, screening, and related measures. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VIII § 7)] 18.25.500 Residential. (1) Policies. (a) Residential use is not water-dependent but is a preferred use of the shorelines when such development is planned and carried out in a manner that protects shoreline functions and processes to be consistent with the no net loss provisions of this program. (b) All residential use and development should be planned, designed, located, and operated to avoid adverse impacts on shoreline processes, aquatic habitat, biological functions, water quality and quantity, aesthetics, navigation, and neighboring uses. (c) All residential use and development should be properly managed to avoid damage to the shoreline environment and prevent cumulative impacts associated with shoreline armoring, overwater structures, stormwater runoff, septic systems, introduction of pollutants, and vegetation clearing. (d) New residential development should be limited to densities that are consistent with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan goals and policies, zoning restrictions, and this program. The density per acre of development should be appropriate to local natural and cultural features. (e) Low impact development practices and clustering of dwelling units and accessory structures should be implemented as appropriate to preserve natural features, minimize physical impacts and reduce utility and road construction and maintenance costs. (f) New residential development should be planned and built in a manner that avoids the need for structural shore armoring and flood hazard reduction in accordance with JCC 18.25.380 (Flood Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 156/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. control structures) and 18.25.410 (shoreline stabilization) of this program and other applicable plans and laws. (g) Residential development should be designed to: (i) Maintain or improve ecological functions and processes; and (ii) Preserve and enhance native shoreline vegetation; and (iii) Control erosion; and (iv) Protect water quality; and (v) Preserve shoreline aesthetic characteristics; and (vi) Minimize structural obstructions to public views and normal public use of the shoreline and the water. (h) Creation of new residential lots through land division should be designed, configured and developed to ensure that no net loss of ecological functions and processes occurs from the plat or subdivision, even when all lots are fully built-out. (i) Residential developments are encouraged, but not required, to provide public access to the shoreline. New multi-unit residential development, including subdivision of land into more than four parcels, is strongly encouraged to provide public access/open space area equal to at least 30 percent of the total development/subdivision area for use by development residents and the public. (j) Whenever possible, nonregulatory methods to protect, enhance, and restore shoreline ecological functions should be encouraged for residential development. (2) Uses and Activities Prohibited Outright. (a) In-water, overwater or floating residencesdwellings or accessory dwelling units, including structures located in or on marshes, bogs, swamps, lagoons, tidelands, ecologically sensitive areas or open water areas, are prohibited. (b) Residential development that can be reasonably expected to require structural shore armoring during the useful life of the structure or within 100 years, whichever is greater, is prohibited. (c) Residential development within a channel migration zone or floodway that can be reasonably expected to require structural flood protection during the useful life of the structure or within 100 years, whichever is greater, is prohibited. (d) Land division and boundary line adjustments in shoreline jurisdiction are prohibited when such actions will result in lot configurations that are likely to require: (i) Significant vegetation removal; (ii) Structural shore armoring; (iii) Shoreline modification for erosion control; Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 157/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (iv) Flood hazard protection; or (v) Result in a net loss of shoreline ecological functions and processes at the time of development of the subdivision and/or during the useful life of the development or within 100 years, whichever is greater. (3) Shoreline Environment Regulations. (a) Priority Aquatic. Residential development is prohibited. (b) Aquatic. Residential development is prohibited. (c) Natural. Residential development consisting of one single-family residence per existing legal lot of record may be allowed as a conditional use. Accessory dwelling units shall be prohibited. (d) Conservancy. Single-family and duplex development may be allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program. All other residential development may be allowed as a conditional use. (e) Shoreline Residential. Residential development is allowed subject to the policies and regulations of this master program. (f) High Intensity. Residential development is allowed subject to the policies and regulations of this master program. (4) Regulations – Primary Residences and Property Subdivision. (a) Residential use and development shall be planned, designed, located, and operated to avoid adverse impacts on shoreline processes, aquatic habitat, biological functions, water quality, aesthetics, navigation, and neighboring uses. (b) The buffer requirements in Article VI of this program apply to residences, normal appurtenances, and accessory dwelling units, except that docks, floats, and beach access structures and other water-dependent and water-related structures accessory to residential use may be permitted to encroach into the buffer in accordance with the applicable provisions of this program. Accessory structures must be sited and designed to not require shoreline armoring within 100 years. (c) Cluster development and appropriate low impact development practices shall be required for development sites constrained by critical areas and/or shoreline buffers. (d) When zoning regulations allow, proposals for multi-story residential development greater than 35 feet above average grade must include an analysis of how the structure would impact the views of surrounding residents. If the proposed residence would block or significantly compromise the view of a substantial number of residences on adjoining areas, the county shall limit the height to 35 feet, or require design revisions or relocation to prevent the loss of views to neighboring properties. (e) New multi-unit residential development, including subdivision of land into more than four parcels, shall provide public access/open space for use by development residents and the public. The county may alter the recommended area threshold per constitutional limits or waive this Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 158/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. requirement if public access is infeasible due to incompatible uses, safety, impacts to shoreline ecology or legal limitations. The county may require alternatives to on-site physical access if on-site physical access is infeasible for the reasons noted. (f) As per Article VI of this chapter, new or expanded subdivisions and planned unit developments comprised of four or more lots or units shall provide public access to publicly owned shorelines or public water bodies unless: (i) The site is designated in a shoreline public access plan for a greater component of public access; or (ii) The public access is demonstrated to be infeasible or inappropriate. (g) New or amended subdivisions, except those for lot line adjustment and lot consolidation purposes, shall provide public access as required in Article VI of this chapter. (h) When required for multi-lot/multi-unit residential development, the amount of public access/open space area shall be determined by site analysis per constitutional limits. The county may waive this requirement if public access is infeasible due to incompatible uses, risks to health or safety, impacts to shoreline ecology or legal limitations. In such cases, the county may require alternatives to on-site physical access if on-site physical access is infeasible for the reasons noted. (i) The type and configuration of public access required for multi-unit/multi-lot residential development shall depend on the proposed use(s) and the following criteria: (i) Subdivisions within shoreline jurisdiction that have views of water areas shall at a minimum provide an area from which the public can view the shoreline. (ii) Subdivisions adjacent to public waterways or tidelands shall provide physical access to public waters/tidelands that are accessible at low tide or low water. (5) Regulations – Accessory Structures/Uses. (a) Accessory dwelling units may be permitted when the primary residential use is allowed pursuant to, and only when, other provisions of this program are met. (b) Accessory structures and uses such as boating facilities, pedestrian beach access structures, shore armoring and shore stabilization shall be subject to the applicable provisions of Article VII of this chapter. (c) A single water-dependent boathouse, as defined in Article II of this chapter, accessory to single- family residential development may be allowed with a conditional use permit and in accordance with JCC 18.25.270(5)(d)(iii) and other provisions of this program. (d) A shoreline substantial development permit or conditional use permit shall be required for all accessory development that is not considered a normal appurtenance. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VIII § 8)] 18.25.510 Signs. (1) Policies. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 159/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (a) Signs should be located, designed and maintained to be visually compatible with local shoreline scenery as seen from both land and water, especially on shorelines of statewide significance. (b) Sign location and design should not significantly impair shoreline views. (c) To avoid continued proliferation of single purpose signs, communities, districts, and/or multi-use or multi-tenant commercial developments are encouraged to erect single, common use gateway signs to identify and give directions to local premises and public facilities. (d) Signs of a commercial or industrial nature should be limited to those areas or premises to which the sign messages refer. (e) Off-premises signs (including billboards) should not be located on shorelines except for approved community gateway or directional signs. (f) Signs near scenic vistas and viewpoints should be restricted in number, location, and height so that enjoyment of these areas is not impaired. (g) Freestanding signs should be located to avoid blocking scenic views and be located on the landward side of public transportation routes which generally parallel the shoreline. (h) To minimize negative visual impacts and obstructions to shoreline access and use, low profile, on-premises wall signs are strongly preferred over freestanding signs or off-premises wall signs. (i) Signs should be designed mainly to identify the premises and nature of enterprise without unduly distracting uninterested passersby. (2) Shoreline Environment Regulations. (a) Priority Aquatic. Only wall signs and low profile freestanding signs under 30 inches in height for water-dependent uses may be allowed subject to the use and development regulations of the abutting upland shoreline environment designation. No one premises may maintain more than two signs in a priority aquatic shoreline area. (b) Aquatic. Only wall signs and low profile freestanding signs under 30 inches in height for water- dependent uses may be allowed subject to the use and development regulations of the abutting upland shoreline environment designation. No one premises may maintain more than two signs in an aquatic shoreline area. (c) Natural. Sign development is prohibited, except for trail marking, hazard warnings, or interpretive scientific or educational purposes and personal signs. Such allowed signs shall be limited in size and number to those required to effect their purpose. (d) Conservancy. Signs may be permitted subject to the policies and regulations of this master program. (e) Shoreline Residential. Signs may be allowed subject to the policies and regulations of this master program. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 160/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (f) High Intensity. Signs may be allowed subject to the policies and regulations of this master program. (3) Regulations. (a) Signs shall comply with JCC 18.30.150 and exemptions listed there also apply in this program. (b) Plans and designs for non-exempt signs must be submitted for review at the time of shoreline permit application. (c) All signs shall be located and designed to minimize interference with vistas, viewpoints, and visual access to the shoreline. (d) Overwater signs or signs on floats or pilings shall be prohibited, except when related to navigation or a water-dependent use. (e) Illuminated signs shall be hooded, shaded, or directed so as to eliminate glare when viewed from surrounding properties or watercourses. (f) No signs shall be placed in view corridors required as a condition of permit approval under this master program. (g) The following types of signs may be permitted, subject to the provisions contained within this section: (i) Water navigational signs and highway and railroad signs necessary for operation, safety and direction; (ii) Public information/interpretive signs directly relating to a shoreline resource, use or activity; (iii) Off-premises, free signs for community identification, information, or directional purposes; (iv) Signs with changing messages; provided, that the information displayed is limited to time, temperature or date or public noncommercial messages; (v) National, state or institutional flags or temporary decorations customary for special holidays and similar events of a public nature; and (vi) Temporary directional signs to public or quasi-public events if removed within 10 days following the event. (h) The following types of signs are prohibited: (i) Signs that impair visual access through view corridors; (ii) Off-premises, detached outdoor advertising signs; (iii) Signs that incorporate spinners, streamers, pennants, flashing or blinking lights and moving devices, except for public highway and railroad signs; (iv) Signs placed on trees or other natural features; and Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 161/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (v) Commercial signs for products, services or facilities located off site. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VIII § 9)] 18.25.520 Transportation. (1) Policies. (a) Major new roads, railroads and parking areas should be located outside of the shoreline jurisdiction whenever feasible. (b) Maintenance and repair of existing roads in shoreline jurisdiction shall use all reasonable methods to minimize adverse impacts on nearby shorelines. (c) Road and railroad locations should be planned to fit the topographical characteristics of the shoreline to minimize alterations to natural shoreline conditions. (d) New transportation facilities should be designed and located to minimize the need for the following: (i) Structural shoreline protection measures; (ii) Modifications to natural drainage systems; and (iii) Waterway crossings. (e) Planning for transportation and circulation corridors shall consider location of public access facilities, and be designed to promote safe and convenient access to those facilities. (f) Pedestrian trails and bicycle paths along shorelines are encouraged where they are compatible with the natural character, resources, and ecology of the shoreline. (g) When transportation corridors are necessary within shoreline jurisdiction, joint-use corridors are preferred and encouraged for roads, utilities, and motorized forms of transportation/circulation. (h) Parking in shoreline areas should be limited to that which directly serves a permitted shoreline use. (i) Parking facilities should be located and designed to minimize adverse environmental impacts to the following, including, but not limited to: (i) Stormwater runoff; (ii) Water quality; (iii) Visual qualities; (iv) Public access; and (v) Vegetation and habitat. (j) Parking areas should be planned to achieve optimum use. Where feasible, parking areas should serve more than one use (e.g., recreational use on weekends, commercial use on weekdays). Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 162/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (k) Transportation facilities should employ pervious materials and other appropriate low impact development techniques where soils and geologic conditions are suitable and where such measures could measurably reduce stormwater runoff. (l) The County should evaluate all transportation, plans and projects for opportunities to adapt and mitigate the effects of climate change. (Comprehensive Plan Policy TR-P-9.7) (2) Uses and Activities Prohibited Outright. (a) Parking as a primary use shall be prohibited within shoreline jurisdiction. (b) Parking is prohibited on structures located in or over water. (3) Shoreline Environment Regulations. (a) Priority Aquatic. Transportation facilities that provide access to water-dependent or water- related uses may be allowed as a conditional use subject to the use and development regulations of the abutting upland shoreline environment designation. New or expanded stream crossings serving non-water-dependent or non-water-related uses may be allowed as a conditional use subject to the use and development regulations of the abutting upland shoreline environment designation. (b) Aquatic. Transportation facilities that provide access to water-dependent or water-related uses may be allowed as a conditional use subject to the use and development regulations of the abutting upland shoreline environment designation. New or expanded stream crossings for non-water- dependent or non-water-related uses may be allowed as a conditional use subject to the use and development regulations of the abutting upland shoreline environment designation. (c) Natural. Transportation facilities are prohibited, except to access approved public recreational development. (d) Conservancy. Transportation facilities may be allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program. Transportation facilities not serving a specific approved use, including roads, railways, and parking areas, may be allowed as a conditional use, provided there is no feasible location outside of the shoreline. (e) Shoreline Residential. Transportation facilities may be allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program. Transportation facilities not serving a specific approved use, including roads, railways, and parking areas, may be allowed as a conditional use, provided there is no feasible location outside of the shoreline. (f) High Intensity. Transportation facilities may be allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program. Transportation facilities not serving a specific approved use, including roads, railways, and parking areas, may be allowed as a conditional use, provided there is no feasible location outside of the shoreline. (4) Regulations – Design and Operation. (a) New transportation facilities in shoreline jurisdiction shall be located to be as far away from shoreline features as possible and shall be designed to generally follow natural topography, to minimize cuts and/or fills, and to avoid adverse impacts to shoreline ecological functions and Commented [LG97]: Comp Plan Policy TR-P-9.7 Commented [LG98R97]: Task Force C Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 163/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. processes, including channel migration zones (CMZs). Wherever roads or railway embankments cross waterways including remnant stream channels and oxbow bends, crossings of ample cross- section shall be provided to span the feature. (b) Raised arterial roads or railways shall be built outside the floodway except for necessary crossings. If built in the floodplain, such routes shall be designed to avoid obstructing floodwaters. Any parking areas required along such roads shall be located to prevent or minimize the need for flood control or shoreline armoring. Local access roads in floodplains shall be built so that floodwaters are not obstructed nor diverted. (c) Transportation facilities shall be designed so that no significant loss of floodway capacity nor measurable increase in predictable flood levels will result. Such facilities shall avoid placing structures within the channel migration zone or any dynamic, shifting channel area. (d) In instances where water crossing is required, roads shall cross shoreline areas and water bodies by the shortest, most direct route feasible unless such route would cause more damage to the environment. (e) When an in-water or overwater development or structure is required for construction, operation or maintenance of transportation facilities, it shall meet all provisions of this section and this program. (f) Bridge supports and abutments shall be designed and spaced so they do not act as walls baffling or blocking flood waters, or interrupting stream channel processes or littoral drift. (g) Bridges and culverts shall be used in accordance with WDFW guidance to protect shoreline ecological functions and processes. Transportation crossings over ordinary high water in floodways shall be constructed on open piling, support piers, culverts, or other similar measures to preserve hydraulic processes. (h) Parking facilities shall only be permitted in shoreline jurisdiction to support an authorized use where it can be demonstrated that there are no feasible alternative locations away from the shoreline. (i) Transportation facilities shall be constructed of materials that will not adversely affect water quality or aquatic plants and animals over the long term. Elements within or over water shall be constructed of materials approved by applicable state agencies for use in water for both submerged portions and other components to avoid discharge of pollutants from splash, rain or runoff. Wood or pilings treated with creosote, pentachlorophenol or other similarly toxic materials are prohibited. Preferred materials are concrete and steel. (j) Transportation development shall be carried out in a manner that maintains or improves state water quality standards for affected waters. (k) Pervious materials and low impact development techniques shall be used to manage stormwater runoff where feasible and where conditions are appropriate. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 164/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (l) Non-emergency construction and repair work shall be scheduled for that time of year when seasonal conditions (weather, streamflow) permit optimum feasible protection of shoreline ecological functions and processes. (m) Transportation shall be required to make joint use of rights-of-way and to consolidate crossings of water bodies where adverse impact to the shoreline can be minimized by doing so. (n) Roads and railroads shall be located to minimize the need for routing surface waters into and through culverts. (5) Regulations – Parking. (a) Parking shall only be permitted in shoreline jurisdiction when necessary to support an authorized use where it can be demonstrated that there are no feasible alternative locations away from the shoreline. Parking facilities shall be buffered from the water’s edge and less intense adjacent land uses by vegetation, undeveloped space, or structures developed for the authorized primary use to the maximum practicable extent. (b) Parking areas shall be developed using low impact development techniques whenever possible including but not limited to the use of permeable surfacing materials. (c) Parking facilities shall be designed and located to minimize adverse impacts upon abutting properties. Landscaping shall consist of county-approved vegetation species planted prior to completion of the parking area. Landscape plantings shall be selected, planted and maintained to provide effective screening within three years of project completion and through maturity of the species. (d) Parking facilities serving individual buildings shall be located landward of the principal building being served, except when the parking facility is located within or beneath the structure and is adequately screened, or in cases when an alternate location would have less environmental impact on the shoreline. (e) Parking facilities for shoreline uses shall be designed to provide safe and convenient pedestrian circulation within the parking area and to the shorelines. (f) Parking facilities shall be provided with facilities adequate to prevent surface water runoff from contaminating water bodies, using best available technologies. A parking facility maintenance program shall be required to assure the proper functioning of drainage facilities over time. [Ord. 7- 13 Exh. A (Art. VIII § 10)] 18.25.530 Utilities. (1) Policies. (a) New public or private utilities should be located inland from the land/water interface, preferably outside of the shoreline, unless: (i) The utility requires a location adjacent to the water; or (ii) Alternative locations are infeasible; or Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 165/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (iii) Utilities are required for permitted shoreline uses consistent with this program. (b) Utilities should be located and designed to avoid public recreation and public access areas and significant historic, archaeological, cultural, scientific or educational resources. (c) Pipeline and cable development should be designed and sited to avoid crossing aquatic lands. If a water crossing is unavoidable, it should be located in an area that will cause the least adverse ecological impact, be installed using the methods that minimize adverse impacts, and be the shortest length feasible. (d) Utility facilities of all kinds that would require periodic maintenance activities should avoid shoreline locations to prevent disruption of shoreline ecological functions. (e) New utilities should use existing transportation and utility sites, rights-of-way and corridors, rather than creating new corridors. (f) New utility installations should be planned, designed and located to eliminate the need for structural shoreline armoring or flood hazard reduction measures. (g) Utility facilities and corridors should be planned, designed and located to protect scenic views. Where feasible, conveyance utilities should be placed underground or alongside or under bridges, unless doing so would cause greater ecological impact or harm. (h) Power generating facilities and other utilities using emerging technologies such as tidal energy generators should be carefully evaluated to ensure that the potential impacts are fully understood. Before approving such facilities, the county should consider whether the benefits to the public outweigh the potential impacts. The county should ensure such facilities are designed and located to protect ecological functions and shoreline resources. (2) Shoreline Environment Regulations. (a) Priority Aquatic. (i) Submarine electrical and communications cables, water lines, sewer lines, fuel pipelines, sewer outfalls, overwater public utility lines consisting of local distribution lines, water intakes, and desalinization facility intakes/outfalls may be allowed as conditional uses subject to policies and regulations of this program and subject to the use and development regulations of the abutting upland shoreline environment designation. (ii) All other utility development is prohibited. (b) Aquatic. (i) Submarine electrical and communications cables, water lines, sewer lines, fuel pipelines, sewer outfalls, overwater public utility lines consisting of local distribution lines, water intakes, and desalinization facility intakes/outfalls may be allowed as conditional uses subject to policies and regulations of this program and subject to the use and development regulations of the abutting upland shoreline environment designation. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 166/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (ii) Submarine water and sewer lines, fuel pipelines, and sewer outfalls may be allowed as conditional uses subject to the use and development regulations of the abutting upland shoreline environment designation. (iii) Tidal generating facilities may be allowed as a conditional use. (iv) All other utility development is prohibited. (c) Natural. (i) Utility development is prohibited. (ii) Maintenance of existing utilities is allowed; provided, that the operator makes every effort to protect shoreline ecological functions and the natural features therein. Removal of existing utilities is preferred over time. (iii) Utilities accessory to and serving permitted uses are allowed. (d) Conservancy. Utility development consisting of local distribution facilities is allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program. The following may be allowed as a conditional use, provided there is no feasible location outside shoreline jurisdiction: sewage outfalls and treatment plants, overwater communication or power lines, fuel pipelines, and other types of hazardous material pipelines, regional facilities, including transmission facilities serving customers outside of Jefferson County, desalinization facilities, and power generating facilities. Freestanding communication towers are prohibited. (e) Shoreline Residential. Utility development consisting of local distribution facilities is allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program. The following may be allowed as a conditional use, provided there is no feasible location outside shoreline jurisdiction: regional facilities, including transmission facilities serving customers outside of Jefferson County, desalinization facilities, and power generating facilities. (f) High Intensity. Utility development consisting of local distribution facilities is allowed subject to policies and regulations of this program. The following may be allowed as a conditional use, provided there is no feasible location outside shoreline jurisdiction: regional facilities, including transmission facilities serving customers outside of Jefferson County, desalinization facilities, and power generating facilities. (3) Regulations – General. (a) All underwater pipelines transporting liquids intrinsically harmful to aquatic life or potentially injurious to water quality are prohibited, except in situations where no other feasible alternative exists. In those limited instances when permitted, automatic shut-off valves shall be provided on both sides of the water body, and pipe sleeves shall be used to facilitate repair without future encroachment on surface waters and wetlands, unless more feasible or technically superior alternatives exist that provide equivalent protection, as deemed by the administrator. (b) Utilities that are not water-dependent shall be located outside shoreline buffers unless it is demonstrated that alternative locations and alternative technology are infeasible. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 167/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (c) The construction, operation and maintenance of utilities shall not cause a net loss of shoreline ecological functions or processes or adversely impact other shoreline resources and values. (d) The following information shall be required for all proposals for utility facilities: (i) A description of the proposed facilities; and (ii) The rationale and justification for siting the proposed facility within shoreline jurisdiction; and (iii) A discussion of alternative locations considered and reasons for their elimination; and (iv) A description of the location of other utility facilities in the vicinity of the proposed project and any plans to include facilities or other types of utilities in the project; and (v) A plan for the reclamation of areas disturbed both during construction and following decommissioning and/or completion of the useful life of the facility; and (vi) A plan for the control of erosion and turbidity during construction and operation; and (vii) An analysis of alternative technologies; and (viii) Documentation that utilities avoid public recreation areas and significant natural, historic or archaeological or cultural sites or that no alternative is feasible and that all feasible measures to reduce harm have been incorporated into the proposal. (ix) When feasible, utility lines shall use existing rights-of-way, corridors and/or bridge crossings and shall avoid duplication and construction of new or parallel corridors in all shoreline areas. (e) Utility facilities shall be constructed using techniques that minimize the need for shoreline fill. When crossing water bodies, pipelines and other utility facilities shall use pier or open pile construction. (f) Vegetation clearing during utility installation or maintenance shall be minimized, and disturbed areas shall be restored or enhanced following project completion consistent with the requirements of this program. (4) Regulations – Water Systems. (a) Components of water systems that are not water-dependent shall be located away from the shoreline. Private and public intake facilities should be located where there will be no net loss in ecological functions or adverse impacts upon shoreline resources, values, natural features, or other users. (b) Desalinization facilities shall be located outside of critical areas and landward of shoreline buffers, except for water-dependent components such as water intakes. (5) Regulations – Essential Public Facilities. (a) Essential public facilities shall be located, developed, managed, and maintained in a manner that protects shoreline ecological functions and processes. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 168/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (b) Essential public facilities shall be designed to enhance shoreline public access and aesthetics. (c) Essential public facilities shall be located outside of shoreline jurisdiction unless they require a waterfront location or unless there is no feasible alternative. (6) Regulations – Sewage Systems. (a) Outfall pipelines and diffusers are water-dependent but shall be located to minimize adverse effects on shoreline ecological functions and processes or adverse impacts upon shoreline resources and values. (b) Septic tanks and drain fields are prohibited where public sewer is readily available. (7) Regulations – Solid Waste Facilities. (a) Facilities for processing and storage and disposal of solid waste are not normally water- dependent. Components that are not water-dependent shall not be permitted on shorelines. (b) Disposal of solid waste on shorelines or in water bodies has potential for severe adverse effects upon ecological processes and functions, property values, public health, natural resources, and local aesthetic values, and shall not be permitted. (c) Temporary storage of solid waste in suitable receptacles is permitted as accessory to a permitted primary use or for litter control. (8) Regulations – Oil, Gas and Natural Gas Transmission. (a) Oil, gas and natural gas transmission and distribution pipelines and related facilities shall not be located in shoreline areas unless alternatives are demonstrated to be infeasible. (b) Local natural gas service lines shall not be located in shoreline areas unless serving approved shoreline uses. Crossings of shorelines shall not be approved unless alternatives are demonstrated to be infeasible. (c) Developers and operators of pipelines and related facilities for gas and oil shall be required to demonstrate adequate provisions for preventing spills or leaks, as well as established procedures for mitigating damages from spills or other malfunctions and shall demonstrate that periodic maintenance will not disrupt shoreline ecological functions. (9) Regulations – Electrical Energy and Communication Systems. (a) Systems components (including substations, towers, and transmission and distribution lines) that are not water-dependent shall not be located on shorelines unless alternatives are infeasible. (b) Underground placement of lines shall be required for new or replacement lines that are parallel to the shoreline, and do not cross water bodies. New or replacement lines that cross water or critical areas may be required to be placed underground depending on impacts on ecological functions and processes and visual impacts. Poles or supports treated with creosote or other wood preservatives that may be mobile in water shall not be used along shorelines or associated wetlands. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 169/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (10) Regulations – Power Generation Facilities. Power generation facilities involving emerging technologies such as tidal energy shall not be permitted until and unless the county determines that the adverse effects can be fully mitigated and the public benefits clearly outweigh the risks to the shoreline environment. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. VIII § 11)] Article IX. Permit Criteria and Exemptions 18.25.540 Substantial development permit criteria. To be authorized, all uses and developments shall be planned and carried out in a manner that is consistent with this program and the policy of the Act as required by RCW 90.58.140(1), regardless of whether a shoreline permit, statement of exemption, shoreline variance, or shoreline conditional use permit is required. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. IX § 1)] 18.25.550 Exemptions from shoreline substantial development permit process. (1) Exemptions shall be construed narrowly. Only those developments that meet the precise terms of one or more of the listed exemptions may be granted exemptions from the substantial development permit process. (2) An exemption from the substantial development permit process is not an exemption from compliance with the Act or this program, or from any other regulatory requirements. To be authorized, all uses and developments must be consistent with the policies and provisions of this program and the Act. (3) A use or development or use that is listed as a conditional use pursuant to this program or is an unlisted use or development, must obtain a conditional use permit even if the development or use does not require a substantial development permit. (4) When a development or use is proposed that does not comply with the bulk, dimensional and/or performance standards of this program, such development or use shall only be authorized by approval of a shoreline variance even if the development or use does not require a substantial development permit. (5) The burden of proof that a development or use is exempt is on the applicant/proponent of the exempt development action. (6) If any part of a proposed development is not eligible for exemption, then a substantial development permit is required for the entire proposed development project. (7) All permits or statements of exemption issued for development or use within shoreline jurisdiction shall include written findings prepared by the administrator, including compliance with bulk and dimensional standards and policies and regulations of this program. The administrator may attach conditions to the approval of exempt developments and/or uses as necessary to assure consistency of the project with the Act and this program. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. IX § 2)] 18.25.560 Exemptions listed. The following activities shall be considered exempt from the requirement to obtain a shoreline substantial development permit in accordance with RCW 90.58.030 and WAC 173-27-040: Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 170/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (1) Fair Market Value. Any development of which the total cost or fair market value, whichever is higher, does not exceed $6,4167,047 or as adjusted by WAC 173-27-040, if such development does not materially interfere with the normal public use of the water or shorelines of the state. For the purpose of determining whether or not a permit is required, the total cost or fair market value shall be based on the value of development that is occurring on shorelines of the state as defined in RCW 90.58.030(2)(c). The total cost or fair market value of the development shall include the fair market value of any donated, contributed or found labor, equipment or materials. (2) Maintenance and Repair. Normal maintenance or repair of existing structures or developments, including damage by accident, fire or elements. Normal maintenance includes those usual acts to prevent a decline, lapse or cessation from a lawfully established condition. Normal repair means to restore a development to a state comparable to its original condition within a reasonable period after decay or partial destruction except where repair causes substantial adverse effects to the shoreline resource or environment. Replacement of a structure or development may be authorized as repair where such replacement is the common method of repair for the type of structure or development and the replacement structure or development is comparable to the original structure or development including but not limited to its size, shape, configuration, location and external appearance and the replacement does not cause substantial adverse effects to shoreline resources or the environment. (3) Residential Bulkhead. Construction of the normal protective bulkhead common to single-family residences. A normal protective bulkhead includes those structural and nonstructural developments installed at or near, and parallel to, the ordinary high water mark for the sole purpose of protecting an existing single-family residence and appurtenant structures from loss or damage by erosion. A normal protective bulkhead is not exempt if constructed for the purpose of creating dry land. When a vertical or near vertical wall is being constructed or reconstructed, not more than one cubic yard of fill per one foot of wall may be used for backfill. When an existing bulkhead is being repaired by construction of a vertical wall fronting the existing wall, it shall be constructed no further waterward of the existing bulkhead than is necessary for construction of new footings. When a bulkhead has deteriorated such that an ordinary high water mark has been established by the presence and action of water landward of the bulkhead, then the replacement bulkhead must be located at or near the actual ordinary high water mark. Beach nourishment and bioengineering erosion control projects may be considered a normal protective bulkhead when any structural elements are consistent with the above requirements and when the project has been approved by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. (4) Emergency Construction. Emergency construction necessary to protect property from damage by the elements. An emergency is an unanticipated and imminent threat to public health, safety or the environment that requires immediate action within a time too short to allow full compliance with this program. Emergency construction does not include development of new permanent protective structures where none previously existed. Where new protective structures are deemed by the administrator to be the appropriate means to address the emergency situation, upon abatement of the emergency situation the new structure shall be removed or any permit that would have been required, absent an emergency, pursuant to Chapter 90.58 RCW, Chapter 173-27 WAC or this program, shall be obtained. All emergency construction shall be consistent with the policies of Chapter 90.58 RCW and this program. As a general matter, flooding or other seasonal events that can be anticipated and may occur but that are not imminent are not an emergency. Commented [LG99]: 2017 a Periodic Checklist Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 171/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (5) Agriculture. Construction and practices normal or necessary for farming, irrigation, and ranching activities, including agricultural service roads and utilities, construction of a barn or similar agricultural structure, and the construction and maintenance of irrigation structures including, but not limited to, head gates, pumping facilities, and irrigation channels. A feedlot of any size, all processing plants, other activities of a commercial nature, or alteration of the contour of the shorelands by leveling or filling other than that which results from normal cultivation, shall not be considered normal or necessary farming or ranching activities. A feedlot shall be an enclosure or facility used or capable of being used for feeding livestock hay, grain, silage, or other livestock feed, but shall not include land for growing crops or vegetation for livestock feeding and/or grazing, nor shall it include normal livestock wintering operations. (6) Drainage. Operation and maintenance of any system of dikes, ditches, drains, or other facilities existing on June 4, 1975, that were created, developed or utilized, primarily as a part of an agricultural drainage or diking system. (7) Navigation Aids. Construction or modification, by or under the authority of the Coast Guard or a designated port management authority, of navigational aids such as channel markers and anchor buoys. (8) Single-Family Residences. Construction on shorelands by an owner, lessee, or contract purchaser of a single-family residence for their own use or for the use of their family, which residence does not exceed a height of 35 feet above average grade level and that meets all requirements of the state agency or local government having jurisdiction thereof. Single-family residence means a detached dwelling designed for and occupied by one family including those structures and developments within a contiguous ownership which are a normal appurtenance as defined in Article II of this chapter. (9) Residential Docks. Construction of an individual/single-user or shared dock for private noncommercial pleasure craft, for use by the owner, lessee, or contract purchaser of a single-family or multifamily residence. The private dock exemption applies to dock construction cost as specified in RCW 90.58.030(3)(e).) and WAC 173-27-040(2)(h). (10) Irrigation. Operation, maintenance, or construction of canals, waterways, drains, reservoirs, or other facilities that now exist or are hereafter created or developed as a part of an irrigation system for the primary purpose of making use of system waters including return flow and artificially stored ground water for the irrigation of lands; provided, that this exemption shall not apply to construction of new irrigation facilities proposed after December 17, 2003. (11) State Property. The marking of property lines or corners on state owned lands, when such marking does not significantly interfere with normal public use of the surface of the water. (12) Energy Facilities. Any project with a certification from the governor pursuant to Chapter 80.50 RCW. (13) Site Exploration. Site exploration and investigation activities that are prerequisite to preparation of a development application for authorization under this program, if: (a) The activity does not interfere with the normal public use of surface waters; (b) The activity will have no significant adverse impact on the environment including but not limited to fish, wildlife, fish or wildlife habitat, water quality and aesthetic values; Commented [LG100]: Periodic Checklist: 2019.a. Optional Edit. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 172/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (c) The activity does not involve the installation of any structure and, upon completion of the activity, the vegetation and land configuration of the site are restored to conditions existing before the activity; (d) A private entity seeking development authorization under this section first posts a performance bond or provides other evidence of financial responsibility to the administrator to ensure that the site is restored to preexisting conditions; and (e) The activity is not subject to the permit requirements of RCW 90.58.550. (14) Noxious Weeds. The process of removing or controlling aquatic noxious weeds, as defined in RCW 17.26.020, through the use of an herbicide or other treatment methods applicable to weed control that are recommended by a final environmental impact statement published by the Department of Agriculture or the Department of Ecology jointly with other state agencies under Chapter 43.21C RCW. (15) Watershed Restoration. Watershed restoration projects as defined herein and by RCW 89.08.460. The administrator shall review the projects for consistency with this program in an expeditious manner and shall issue its decision along with any conditions within 45 days of receiving a complete application form from the applicant/proponent. No fee may be charged for accepting and processing applications for watershed restoration projects as defined in this section. For the purposes of this exception, the following definitions apply: (16a) “Watershed restoration project” means a public or private project authorized by the sponsor of a watershed restoration plan that implements the plan or part of the plan and consists of one or more of the following activities: (ai) A project that involves less than 10 miles of stream reach, in which less than 25 cubic yards of sand, gravel, or soil is removed, imported, disturbed or discharged, and in which no existing vegetation is removed except as minimally necessary to facilitate additional plantings; (bii) A project for the restoration of an eroded or unstable stream bank that employs the principles of bioengineering, including limited use of rock as a stabilization only at the toe of the bank, and with primary emphasis on using native vegetation to control erosive forces of flowing water; or (ciii) A project primarily designed to improve fish and wildlife habitat, remove or reduce impediments to migration of fish, or enhance the fishery resource available for use by all of the citizens of the state; provided, that any structures, other than a bridge or culvert or in-stream habitat enhancement structure associated with the project, is less than 200 square feet in floor area and is located above the ordinary high water mark. (17b) “Watershed restoration plan” means a plan, developed or sponsored by the Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Department of Ecology, the Department of Transportation, a federally recognized Indian tribe acting within and pursuant to its authority, a city, a county or a conservation district that provides a general program and implementation measures or actions for the preservation, restoration, recreation, or enhancement of the natural resource character and ecology of a stream, stream segment, drainage area or watershed for which agency and public review has been conducted pursuant to Chapter 43.21C RCW, the State Environmental Policy Act. Commented [LG101]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 173/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (18)(16) Habitat Restoration. A public or private project, the primary purpose of which is to improve fish or wildlife habitat or fish passage, when all of the following apply: pursuant to WAC 173-27-040(2)(p). (a) The project has been approved in writing by the Department of Fish and Wildlife as necessary for the improvement of the habitat or passage and appropriately designed and sited to accomplish the intended purpose; (b) The project received hydraulic project approval by the Department of Fish and Wildlife pursuant to Chapter 75.20 RCW; and (c) The administrator has determined that the project is consistent with this program. The administrator shall make such determination in a timely manner and provide it by letter to the project proponent. (17) ADA Retrofit. The external or internal retrofitting of an existing structure with the exclusive purpose of compliance with the Americans with disabilities act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12101 et seq.) or to otherwise provide physical access to the structure by individuals with disabilities. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. IX § 3)] 18.25.570 Statements of exemption. (1) The administrator is hereby authorized to grant or deny requests for statements of exemption from the shoreline substantial development permit requirement for uses and developments within shorelines that are specifically listed above. Such statements shall be applied for on forms provided by the administrator. The statement shall be in writing and shall indicate the specific exemption of this program that is being applied to the development, and shall provide a summary of the administrator’s analysis of the consistency of the project with this program and the Act. As appropriate, such statements of exemptions shall contain conditions and/or mitigating measures of approval to achieve consistency and compliance with the provisions of this program and Act. A denial of an exemption shall be in writing and shall identify the reason(s) for the denial. The administrator’s actions on the issuance of a statement of exemption or a denial are subject to appeal pursuant to the appeal provisions in Article X of this chapter. (2) Exempt activities related to any of the following shall not be conducted until a statement of exemption has been obtained from the administrator: dredging, flood control works and in-stream structures, archaeological or historic site alteration, clearing and ground disturbing activities such as landfill or excavation, dock construction, shore stabilization, freestanding signs, or any development within a priority aquatic, aquatic or natural shoreline designation; provided, that no separate written statement of exemption is required for the construction of a single-family residence when a county building permit application has been reviewed and approved by the administrator; provided further, that no statement of exemption is required for emergency development pursuant to WAC 173-14- 040(1)(d). (3) No statement of exemption shall be required for other exempt uses or developments unless the administrator has cause to believe a substantial question exists as to qualifications of the specific use or development for the exemption, or the administrator determines there is a likelihood of adverse impacts to shoreline ecological functions. (4) Whenever the exempt activity also requires a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 10 permit under the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 or a Section 404 permit under the Federal Water Pollution Control Commented [LG102]: 2019c / 2007 c Periodic Checklist: Commented [LG103]: 2016 a Periodic Checklist Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 174/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. Act of 1972, a copy of the written statement of exemption shall be sent to the applicant/proponent and Ecology pursuant to WAC 173-27-050. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. IX § 4)] 18.25.580 Variance permit criteria. (1) The purpose of a variance is to grant relief to specific bulk or dimensional requirements set forth in this program where there are extraordinary or unique circumstances relating to the property such that the strict implementation of this program would impose unnecessary hardships on the applicant/proponent or thwart the policies set forth in RCW 90.58.020. Use restrictions may not be varied. In authorizing a variance, special conditions may be attached to the permit by the county or the Department of Ecology to control any undesirable effects of the proposed use. Final authority for variance permit decisions shall be granted by the Department of Ecology. (2) Variances will be granted in any circumstance where denial would result in a thwarting of the policy enumerated in RCW 90.58.020. In all instances extraordinary circumstances shall be shown and the public interest shall suffer no substantial detrimental effect. (3) Variances may be authorized, provided the applicant/proponent can demonstrate all of the following: (a) That the strict application of the bulk or dimensional criteria set forth in this program precludes or significantly interferes with a reasonable permitted use of the property; (b) That the hardship described above is specifically related to the property, and is the result of conditions such as irregular lot shape, size, or natural features and the application of this program, and not, for example, from deed restrictions or the applicant’s/proponent’s own actions; (c) That the design of the project will be compatible with other permitted activities in the area and will not cause adverse effects on adjacent properties or the shoreline environment; (d) That the variance authorized does not constitute a grant of special privilege not enjoyed by the other properties in the area, and will be the minimum necessary to afford relief; (e) That the public interest will suffer no substantial detrimental effect; (f) That the public rights of navigation and use of the shorelines will not be materially interfered with by the granting of the variance; and (g) Mitigation is provided to offset unavoidable adverse impacts caused by the proposed development or use. (4) In the granting of all variances, consideration shall be given to the cumulative environmental impact of additional requests for like actions in the area. For example, if variances were granted to other developments in the area where similar circumstances exist, the total of the variances should also remain consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020 and should not produce significant adverse effects to the shoreline ecological functions and processes or other users. (5) Other factors that may be considered in the review of variance requests include the conservation of valuable natural resources and the protection of views from nearby roads, surrounding properties and public areas. In addition, variance requests based on the applicant’s/proponent’s desire to enhance the Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 175/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. view from the subject development may be granted where there are no likely detrimental effects to existing or future users, other features or shoreline ecological functions and/or processes, and where reasonable alternatives of equal or greater consistency with this program are not available. In platted residential areas, variances shall not be granted that allow a greater height or lesser shore setback than what is typical for the immediate block or area. (6) Permits and/or variances applied for or approved under other county codes shall not be construed as shoreline permits under this program. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. IX § 5)] 18.25.590 Conditional use permit criteria. (1) The purpose of a conditional use permit is to allow greater flexibility in administering the use regulations of this program in a manner consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020. In authorizing a conditional use, special conditions may be attached to the permit by the county or the Department of Ecology to control any undesirable effects of the proposed use. Final authority for conditional use permit decisions rests with the Department of Ecology. (2) Uses specifically classified or set forth in this program as conditional uses and unlisted uses may be authorized, provided the applicant/proponent can demonstrate all of the following: (a) That the proposed use will be consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020 and this program. (b) That the proposed use will not interfere with normal public use of public shorelines. (c) That the proposed use of the site and design of the project will be compatible with other permitted uses within the area. (d) That the proposed use will not cause adverse effects to the shoreline environment in which it is to be located. (e) That the public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effect. (3) In the granting of all conditional use permits, consideration shall be given to the cumulative environmental impact of additional requests for like actions in the area. For example, if conditional use permits were granted for other developments in the area where similar circumstances exist, the sum of the conditional uses and their impacts should also remain consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020 and should not produce a significant adverse effect to the shoreline ecological functions and processes or other users. (4) Permits and/or variances applied for or approved under county zoning or subdivision code requirements shall not be construed as shoreline variances under this program. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. IX § 6)] 18.25.600 Unclassified uses. Other uses not specifically classified or set forth in this program, including the expansion or resumption of a nonconforming use, may be authorized as discretionary conditional uses, C(d), provided the applicant/proponent can demonstrate that the proposal will satisfy the criteria set forth above, and that the use clearly requires a specific site location on the shoreline not provided for under this program, and extraordinary circumstances preclude reasonable use of the property in a manner consistent with the use regulations of this program. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. IX § 7)] Commented [LG104]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 176/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. Article X. Administration and Enforcement 18.25.610 Administrative authority and responsibility. (1) Administrator. The director of the Jefferson County department of community development or his/her designee (the administrator) is vested with authority to: (a) Administer this master program; (b) Recommend to the hearing examiner approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any permit applications or revisions in accordance with the policies and regulations of this master program and the provisions of the Jefferson County Unified Development Code; (c) Grant written permit exemptions from shoreline substantial development permit requirements of this master program; (d) Determine compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (Chapter 43.21C RCW; Chapter 197-11 WAC); (e) Specify the required application forms and submittal requirements including the type, details and number of copies; (f) Advise interested citizens and project proponents of the goals, policies, regulations and procedures of this master program; (g) Make administrative decisions and interpretations of the policies and regulations of this master program andfor consistency with the Shoreline Management Act, including consultation with Ecology prior to issuance; (h) Collect applicable fees; (i) Determine that application submittals are substantially complete; (j) Make field inspections as necessary; (k) Submit substantial development permit, variance permit and conditional use permit applications and make written recommendations and findings on such permits to the hearing examiner for his/her consideration and final action; (l) Assure that proper notice is given to appropriate persons and the public for all hearings; (m) Provide technical and administrative assistance to the hearing examiner as required for effective and equitable implementation of this master program and the Act; (n) Provide a summary report of the shoreline permits issued in the past calendar year to the hearing examiner and the Jefferson County board of county commissioners; (o) Investigate, develop and propose amendments to this master program as deemed necessary to more effectively and equitably achieve its goals and policies; (p) Seek remedies for alleged violations of this master program, the provisions of the Act, or of conditions of any approved shoreline permit issued by the county; Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 177/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (q) Coordinate information with affected agencies; and (r) Forward any decision on any permit application to the Washington State Department of Ecology for filing or action. (2) Hearing Examiner. The hearing examiner is vested with the authority and responsibility to: (a) Approve, condition, or deny shoreline substantial development permits, variance permits and conditional use permits after considering the findings and recommendations of the administrator; (b) Decide local administrative appeals of the administrator’s actions and interpretations, as provided in this program and the county Unified Development Code; (c) Consider shoreline substantial development permit, variance permit and conditional use permit applications and administrative appeals of the administrator’s actions on regular meeting days or public hearings; (d) Review the findings and recommendations for permit applications or appeals of the administrator’s actions and interpretations; (e) Approve, approve with conditions, or deny substantial development permits, variance permits and conditional use permits; (f) Conduct public hearings on appeals of the administrator’s actions, interpretations and decisions; (g) Base all decisions on shoreline permits or administrative appeals on the criteria established in this master program; and (h) At his or her sole discretion, require any project proponent granted a shoreline permit to post a bond or other acceptable security with the county, conditioned to assure that the project proponent and/or his or her successors adhere to the approved plans and all conditions attached to the shoreline permit. Such bonds or securities shall have a face value of at least 150 percent of the estimated development cost including attached conditions. (3) Board of Commissioners. (a) The Jefferson County board of county commissioners (the BOCC) is vested with the authority to approve any revisions or amendments to this master program in accordance with the applicable requirements of the Act and the Washington Administrative Code. (b) The BOCC shall review and act upon any recommendations of the shoreline administrator for amendments to, or revisions of, this master program. The BOCC shall enter findings and conclusions setting forth the factors it considered in reaching its decision. To become effective any amendment to this master program must be reviewed and adopted by the Department of Ecology pursuant to RCW 90.58.190 and Chapter 173-26 WAC. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 1)] 18.25.620 Permit application review. (1) Determinations of the administrator regarding the geographic applicability of this master program, permit exemptions and application submittal requirements shall be processed as Type I decisions pursuant to Chapter 18.40 JCC. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 178/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (2) Applications for substantial development permits and varianceshall be processed as a Type II permit decision. Variance permits shall be processed as Type III decisions pursuant to the Chapter 18.40 JCC. (3) Applications for uses/development listed as an administrative conditional use permit (i.e., “C(a)”) in Table 18.25.220 shall be processed according to the procedures for Type II land use decisions established in Article IV of Chapter 18.40 JCC. (4) Applications for uses/developments listed as discretionary conditional use permits (i.e., “C(d)”) in Table 18.25.220 shall, at a minimum, be processed according to the procedures for Type II land use decisions established in Article IV of Chapter 18.40 JCC. However, in accordance with Chapter 18.40 JCC, the administrator may on a case-by-case basis refer a discretionary conditional use permit application to the hearing examiner to be processed according to the procedures for Type III land use decisions established in Article IV of Chapter 18.40 JCC. (5) All amendments to this master program shall be processed as Type V decisions pursuant to Chapter 18.40 JCC. (6) Whenever the administrator issues a determination or recommendation and/or conditions of approval on a proposal which will result in the denial or substantial alteration of a proposed action, such determinations will be provided in writing stating the relationship(s) between the ecological factors, the proposed action and the condition(s). [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 2)] (7) Where other approvals or permits are required for a use or development that does not require an open record hearing, such approvals or permits shall not be granted until a shoreline approval or permit is granted. All shoreline approvals and permits shall include written findings prepared by the administrator documenting compliance with bulk and dimensional standards and other policies and regulations of this program. (8) Developments not required to obtain shoreline permits or local reviews. Requirements to obtain a substantial development permit, conditional use permit, variance, letter of exemption, or other review to implement the Shoreline Management Act do not apply to the following: (i) Remedial actions. Pursuant to RCW 90.58.355, any person conducting a remedial action at a facility pursuant to a consent decree, order, or agreed order issued pursuant to chapter 70.105D RCW, or to the department of ecology when it conducts a remedial action under chapter 70.105D RCW. (ii) Boatyard improvements to meet NPDES permit requirements. Pursuant to RCW 90.58.355, any person installing site improvements for storm water treatment in an existing boatyard facility to meet requirements of a national pollutant discharge elimination system storm water general permit. (iii) WSDOT facility maintenance and safety improvements. Pursuant to RCW 90.58.356, Washington State Department of Transportation projects and activities meeting the conditions of RCW 90.58.356 are not required to obtain a substantial development permit, conditional use permit, variance, letter of exemption, or other local review. (iv) Projects consistent with an environmental excellence program agreement pursuant to RCW 90.58.045. Commented [LG105]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Commented [LG106]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Commented [LG107]: 2017 c Periodic Review Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 179/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (v) Projects authorized through the Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council process, pursuant to chapter 80.50 RCW. 18.25.630 Minimum permit application requirements. The administrator may vary or waive the requirements of this section on a case-by-case basis according to administrative application requirements. A complete application for a substantial development, conditional use, or variance permit shall contain, as a minimum, all of the information required in any applicable section of this program, all of the information required in JCC 18.40.100, and any other information the administrator deems pertinent, including at a minimum: (1) The name, address and phone number of the applicant/proponent, applicant’s representative, and/or property owner if different from the applicant/proponent. (2) The property address and identification of the section, township and range to the nearest quarter, quarter section or longitude and latitude to the nearest minute. (3) The name of the shoreline (water body) that the site of the proposal is associated with. (4) A general description of the property as it exists at the time of application including its use, physical and ecological characteristics, improvements and structures. (5) A general description of the project vicinity including adjacent uses, structures and improvements, development intensity, and physical characteristics. (6) A vicinity map showing the relationship of the property and proposed development or use to roads, utilities, existing developments and uses on adjacent properties. (7) A site plan and/or engineered drawings identifying existing conditions consisting of photographs, text, maps and elevation drawings, drawn to an appropriate scale to clearly depict all required information. (8) Location of the ordinary high water mark of all water bodies within or adjacent to the project boundary. For any development that requires a precise location of the ordinary high water mark, the applicant/proponent shall provide a survey and describe the biological and hydrological basis for the location as indicated on the plans. Where the ordinary high water mark is neither adjacent to or within the boundary of the project, the plan shall indicate the distance and direction to the ordinary high water mark of the adjacent shoreline. (9) Existing land contours at intervals sufficient to accurately determine the existing character of the property. Areas within the project boundary that will not be altered by the development may be indicated as such and contours approximated for that area. (10) Critical areas as designated in Chapter 18.22 JCC. (11) A general description of the character of vegetation found on the site. (12) A description of the existing ecological functions and processes affecting, maintaining, or influencing the shoreline at/near the project site. Commented [LG108]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 180/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (13) The dimensions and locations of all existing structures and improvements. (14) The dimensions and locations of all proposed structures and improvements including but not limited to buildings, paved or graveled areas, roads, utilities, septic tanks and drain fields, material stockpiles or surcharge, and stormwater management facilities. (15) Proposed land contours overlain on existing contours. The contours shall be at intervals sufficient to accurately determine the extent of proposed change to the land that is necessary for the development. Areas within the project boundary that will not be altered by the development may be indicated as such and contours approximated for that area. (16) A summary characterization of the effects of the project on existing ecological functions and processes in the vicinity of the project. If the project is likely to have adverse effects on shoreline ecological functions or processes, a mitigation plan shall be provided demonstrating measures that will be taken to offset impacts. (17) On all variance applications the plans shall clearly indicate where development could occur without approval of a variance, the physical features and circumstances on the property that provide a basis for the request, and the location of adjacent structures and use. (18) The administrator may vary or waive the requirements in subsection (1) of this section on a case -by-case basis according to administrative application requirements. (19) Where other approvals or permits are required for a use or development that does not require an open record hearing, such approvals or permits shall not be granted until a shoreline approval or permit is granted. All shoreline approvals and permits shall include written findings prepared by the administrator documenting compliance with bulk and dimensional standards and other policies and regulations of this program. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 3)] 18.25.640 Preapplication conferences. (1) Preapplication conferences are required in accordance with JCC 18.40.090(2) for projects including, but not limited to: (a) All Type II and Type III project applications. (b) Type I project applications proposing impervious surfaces of 10,000 square feet or more and/or non-single-family structures of 5,000 square feet or more. (c) All projects involving in-water work or work below the ordinary high water mark. (2) Preapplication conferences for all types of applications not listed in subsection (1) of this section or specified by JCC 18.40.090(2) are strongly encouraged, and requests for conferences will be considered by the administrator on a time-available basis. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 4)] 18.25.650 Notice of application and permit application review. (1) Public notice requirements shall occur in accordance with Chapter 18.40 JCC, Article III and the following: Commented [LG109]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Commented [LG110]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 181/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (a) Type I permits (statements of exemption) shall not require notice of application or open record hearing consistent with JCC 18.40.040. However, if a Type I permit is not categorically exempt under SEPA, then a notice may be required. (b) The administrator shall issue a notice of application on all Type II project permit applications in accordance with Chapter 18.40 JCC, Article III. (c) The administrator shall issue a notice of application on all Type III project permit applications in accordance with Chapter 18.40 JCC, Article III. (2) Permit application review shall occur in accordance with Chapter 18.40 JCC, Article IV., except as provided in Subsection (3). [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 5)] (3) Special procedures for WSDOT projects. (a) Permit review time for projects on a state highway. Pursuant to RCW 47.01.485, the Legislature established a target of 90 days review time for local governments. (b) Optional process allowing construction to commence twenty-one days after date of filing. Pursuant to RCW 90.58.140, Washington State Department of Transportation projects that address significant public safety risks may begin twenty-one days after the date of filing if all components of the project will achieve no net loss of shoreline ecological functions. 18.25.660 Nonconforming development. The following shall apply to nonconforming uses and developments, as defined in Article II of this chapter: (1) Legally established uses, buildings, structures and/or lots of record that do not meet the specific standards of this program are considered legal nonconforming and may continue as long as they remain otherwise lawful, and meet the following criteria: (a) Existing, Permitted, or Vested. The use, building, structure, or lot was existing on the effective date of initial adoption of this program (December 20, 1974), or any subsequent amendment thereto, or was authorized under a permit or approval issued, or is otherwise vested to this program; or (b) Variance. A structure for which a variance has been issued; or (c) Conditional. The existing use is designated as a conditional use under this program and existed prior to the adoption of this program or the adoption of an applicable amendment hereto and which has not obtained a conditional use permit; or (d) Abandoned. As per JCC 18.20.260, the use or structure is not discontinued or abandoned for a period more than two years. A property owner may be allowed three years if they demonstrate a bona fide intention to sell or lease the property. For purposes of calculating this time period, a use is discontinued or abandoned upon the occurrence of the first of any of the following events: (i) On the date when the land was physically vacated; Commented [LG111]: 2015 a Periodic Checklist Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 182/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (ii) On the date the use ceases to be actively involved in the sale of merchandise or the provision of services; or (iii) On the date of termination of any lease or contract under which the nonconforming use has occupied the land. (2) Normal maintenance and repair of a nonconforming structure may be allowed in accordance with JCC 18.25.560, and other provisions of this program. (3) Any repair, replacement, relocation or expansion/enlargement of a bulkhead shall conform to the provisions in Article VII of this chapter. (4) If a nonconforming use or structure is discontinued or abandoned per this section the nonconforming rights shall expire and any subsequent use shall be conforming. (5) New single-family residential development on lots whose dimensions do not allow a residence to be constructed outside the standard shoreline buffer may be allowed without a variance in accordance with the provision in JCC 18.25.270 (nonconforming lots). (6) Rebuilding After Damage. If a nonconforming development sustains major structural damage due to fire, flood or other natural disaster, it may be reconstructed upon its original site and to the configuration existing immediately prior to the damage, provided: (a) The rebuilt structure will not cause adverse effects to adjacent properties or to the shoreline environment; and (b) The site is geologically stable; and (c) No horizontal or vertical expansion or enlargement of the footprint or height, or any degree of relocation, will occur; and (d) No degree of relocation will occur, except to increase conformity, in which case the structure shall be located as far landward as possible or in the least environmentally damaging location relative to the shoreline or any critical area; and (e) The submittal of applications for permits necessary to restore the development is begun within six months of the damage. The administrator may waive this requirement in situations with extenuating circumstances such as resolution of an estate, or widespread economic or natural disaster; and (f) The reconstruction is commenced within two years of the issuance of permits. Administrator may allow a one year extension. (7) In-Water/Overwater. When a use or development is not prohibited, replacement of nonconforming structures or buildings or portions thereof within the aquatic or priority aquatic shoreline area is allowed and shall comply with program requirements for materials that come in contact with the water pursuant to Article VI of this chapter. In-water and overwater use/development not allowed by this program shall not be replaced in-/overwater. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 183/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (8) Minor Expansion///Enlargement without Conditional Use Permit or Shoreline Variance – Single- family Residential. The administrator may allow a one-time landward enlargement or expansion of nonconforming single-family residences by the addition of space to the exterior of the main structure or the addition of normal appurtenances without a shoreline conditional use permit or shoreline variancewith a Type II Substantial Development Permit, provided, and subject to, the following: General Standards (a) The structure is located landward of the ordinary high water mark; and (b) No lateral or waterward enlargement or expansion beyond the existing structure’s foundation walls will occur; and (c(b) The increase/expansion in total footprint area does not threaten critical areas; and (d(c) The increased heightexpansion does not significantly impair the public’s view of the shoreline. Waterward (d) No waterward enlargement or expansion, except ‘footprint infill’ as follows: (i) A ’fill the notch’ expansion may be allowed if contained within the outer boundary of the existing structure’s foundation walls; or (ii) An ‘enclose the porch’ expansion may be allowed if contained within a legal pre-existing impervious area, provided all the following are met: A. The property is designated as Shoreline Residential (SR) or High Intensity (HI) B. Expansion does not exceed 200 square feet; C. Does not extend closer to the OHWM than the common line setback; and D. Applicant submits a planting plan consistent with subsection (8)(g) demonstrating that the enhancement area includes revegetation of a native community of at least 80% of the buffer area b; and Nonwaterward Standards (e) EnlargementsNonwaterward enlargements, expansions or additions that increase the total footprint of the existing structure(s) by up to 10 percent shall be allowed, provided the expansion or addition will not adversely affect critical areas, significantly impair the ability of a substantial number of people to view the shorelinemeets (a) through (c), or increase the degree of nonconformity. (f) EnlargementsNonwaterward enlargements, expansions or additions that increase the total footprint of the existing structure(s) greater than 10 percent but no more than 25 percent or increase the structure height up to the limits allowed by this program shall be allowed; provided, thatrequirements in (a) through (c) are met, the addition will not adversely affect critical areas, significantly impair the ability of a substantial number of people to view the shoreline,proposal does not increase the degree of nonconformity, and further provided, that an equivalent area of shoreline buffer is enhanced through planting of native vegetation. The administrator shall require a planting plan to ensure this standard is implemented. per (g). Commented [LG112]: Task Force A Commented [LG113]: Related to Task Force A Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 184/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. Planting Standards (g) Area enlargements, expansions or additions under subsection (d) or (f) of this section require that an equivalent area of shoreline buffer be enhanced through planting of native vegetation. The planting plan should include removal of non-native or invasive vegetation and installation of a mix of trees, shrubs and groundcovers with a species diversity and spacing typical of native Puget Sound or Pacific Coast forest. Trees shall be planted on 12-foot centers and shrubs planted on 6-foot centers. If the enhancement area already contains some native vegetation, the planting area should be expanded to accommodate the equivalent number of trees and shrubs as would be installed on bare ground. Applicants may develop a planting plan with or without professional assistance so long as it includes the following information: (i) A description and photo of the existing conditions in the proposed enhancement area, to include identification of any invasive or non-native species to be removed and any native vegetation to be preserved. The boundaries of the proposed planting area should be marked and visible in the photograph. (ii) A site plan showing the location and dimensions of existing and proposed structures, the proposed planting area, and the shoreline buffer. (iii) A plant schedule listing the species and proposed numbers of trees, shrubs, and groundcovers. (iv) If the area to be enhanced is already well vegetated, the applicant shall identify an equivalent enhancement area contiguous to the well-vegetated area. (v) A 5-year monitoring program to ensure survivability. Monitoring reports may be prepared by the property owner or applicant at the end of years 1, 3 and 5, provided that the report fully addresses the performance standards and any other maintenance requirements prescribed by the enhancement plan, and provides as-built plans, plant counts, and comprehensive photo documentation. The County has the right to request that property owners and applicants hire a qualified professional to prepare the monitoring program and periodic reports at years 1, 3, and 5 if the documentation is not adequate. Enhancements shall be maintained in perpetuity. (9) Moderate Expansion/Enlargement with a Conditional C(d) Use Permit – Nonwaterward. (a) The administrator shall require a conditional discretionary use permit for any of the following: (i) Enlargement or expansion of nonconforming single-family residences by the addition of space to the exterior of the main structure or normal appurtenances where the total footprint will increase by more than 25 percent or the expansion/enlargement occurs vertically, laterally or landward, but not waterward, of the structure., except waterward. (ii) Enlargement or expansion of single-family residences where the addition of space to the exterior of the main structure is likely to adversely affect critical areas, or occurs vertically and is likely to obstruct the view of an adjacent development. Commented [GU114]: AJS: Added guidance re: simple planting plan requirements. Intended to be implementable by property owners without professional help. Commented [LG115]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Commented [LG116]: Staff Docket/Code Interpretations Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 185/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (iii) When allowed, an equivalent area of shoreline buffer area shall be enhanced through planting of native vegetation, plus additional mitigation to be required as appropriate. The administrator shall require a planting plan as outlined in subsection (8)(g) of this section to ensure this standard is implemented. (b) Changing an Existing Nonconforming Use. A structure that is being or has been used for a nonconforming use may be used for a different nonconforming use only upon the approval of a conditional use permit, provided all the following criteria are met: (i) No reasonable alternative conforming use is practical because of the configuration of the structure and/or the property; and (ii) The proposed use will be at least as consistent with the policies and provisions of the Act and this program and as compatible with the uses in the area as the preexisting use; and (iii) The use or activity is enlarged, intensified, increased or altered only to the minimum amount necessary to achieve the intended functional purpose; and (iv) The structure(s) associated with the nonconforming use shall not be expanded in a manner that increases the extent of the nonconformity including encroachment into areas, such as setbacks and/or buffers established by this program, where new structures, development or use would not be allowed; and (v) The vegetation conservation standards of Article VI of this chapter are met; and (vi) The change in use, remodel or expansion will not create adverse impacts to shoreline ecological functions and/or processes; and (vii) Uses which are specifically prohibited or which would thwart the intent of the Act or this program shall not be authorized. (viii) Nonconforming structures with conforming uses within commercial or mixed-use developments may be expanded or enlarged within the existing building footprint as a conditional use. (10) Other Expansion/Enlargement with a Shoreline Variance. (a) Waterward: Single-Family Residential. Enlargement or expansion of single-family residences that extends waterward beyond the existing residential foundation walls,limits of Section (8), further into a critical area, further into the minimum required side yard setback, or that increases the structure height above the limits established by this program shall require a variance. (b) Non-Single-Family Residential. Nonconforming structures, other than nonconforming single- family residences, that are expanded, enlarged or relocated, must obtain a variance or be brought into conformance with this program and the Act. Any nonconforming development that is moved any distance must be moved to comply with the bulk and dimensions requirements of this program. (c) Where an expansion is proposed per subsections (a) and (b), the proponent shall provide an equivalent area of shoreline buffer enhancement through planting of native vegetation consistent Commented [LG117]: Task Force A Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 186/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. with an enhancement plan prepared per section (8)(g) except that the enhancement plan shall be prepared by a qualified professional. (d) When an expansion involves a variance to height for the nonconforming structure, see requirements at JCC 18.25.300. (11) Residential structures and appurtenant structures that were legally established and are used for a conforming use, but that do not meet standards for the following are considered a conforming structure: Setbacks, buffers, or yards; area; bulk; height; or density. Any redevelopment, expansion, change of the class of occupancy, or replacement of such a conforming residential structure may be authorized only when consistent with all applicable provisions of this SMP. This section applies until a change is proposed to the structures, in which case remaining provisions of .660 apply. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 6)] 18.25.665 State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) compliance. (1) Whenever an application for shoreline substantial development permit, shoreline variance, shoreline conditional use permit, or statement of exemption is subject to the rules and regulations of SEPA (Chapter 43.21C RCW), the review requirements of SEPA, including time limitations, shall apply, where applicable. (2) Applications for shoreline permit(s) or approval(s) that are not categorically exempt shall be subject to environmental review by the responsible official of Jefferson County pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (Chapter 197-11 WAC). (3) As part of SEPA review, the responsible official may require additional information regarding the proposed development in accordance with Chapter 197-11 WAC. (4) Failure of the applicant/proponent to submit sufficient information for a threshold determination to be made shall be grounds for the responsible official to determine the application incomplete. [Ord. 7- 13 Exh. A (Art. X § 7)] 18.25.670 Burden of proof. Permit applicants/proponents have the burden of proving that the proposed development is consistent with the criteria set forth in the Act and this program. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 8)] 18.25.680 Permit conditions. In granting, revising, or extending a shoreline permit, the administrator may attach such conditions, modifications, or restrictions thereto regarding the location, character, and other features of the proposed development deemed necessary to assure that the development will be consistent with the policy and provisions of the Act and this program as well as the supplemental authority provided in Chapter 43.21 RCW as applicable. In cases involving unusual circumstances or uncertain effects, a condition may be imposed to require monitoring with future review or reevaluation to assure conformance with the Act and this program. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 9)] 18.25.690 Public hearings. (1) Public hearings shall occur in accordance with JCC 18.40.230 and 2.30.090. Commented [LG118]: 2011 d Periodic Checklist Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 187/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (2) Public hearing requirements for permit appeals shall be processed according to JCC 18.40.330; provided, that appeals of a determination regarding a statement of exemption shall occur in accordance with JCC 18.40.390. The fee for such appeal shall be as set forth in the Jefferson County fee ordinance and must be paid by the appellant at the time of filing the appeal. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 10)] 18.25.700 Expiration of permits and permit exemptions. The following time requirements shall apply to all permit exemptions, substantial development permits and to any development authorized pursuant to a variance permit or conditional use permit: (1) Construction shall be commenced or, where no construction is involved, the use or activity shall be commenced within two years of the effective date of the permit or permit exemption; provided, that the administrator may authorize a single extension based on reasonable factors, if a request for extension has been filed before the expiration date and notice of the proposed extension is given to parties of record and the Department of Ecology. (2) Authorization to conduct development activities shall terminate five years after the effective date of a permit or permit exemption; provided, that the shoreline administrator may authorize a single extension for a period not to exceed one year based on reasonable factors, if a request for extension has been filed before the expiration date and notice of the proposed extension is given to parties of record and the Department of Ecology. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 11)] 18.25.710 Permits and permit exemptions – Effective date. (1) The effective date of a shoreline permit or permit exemption shall be the date of the last action required on the shoreline permit or permit exemption and all other government permits and approvals that authorize the development to proceed, including all administrative and legal actions on any such permit or approval. (2) It is the responsibility of the project proponent to inform the administrator of the permit applications filed with agencies other than Jefferson County and of any related administrative and legal actions on any permit or approval. If no notice of the permits or approvals is given to the administrator prior to the date established by the shoreline permit, permit exemption, or the provisions of this section, the expiration of a permit shall be based on the shoreline permit or permit exemption. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 12)] 18.25.720 Satisfaction of conditions required prior to occupancy or use. When permit or permit exemption approval is based on conditions, such conditions shall be satisfied prior to occupancy or use of a structure or prior to commencement of a nonstructural activity; provided, that an alternative compliance limit may be specified in the permit or permit exemption. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 13)] 18.25.730 Revisions following expiration of original permit or permit exemption. Revisions to permits and permit exemptions may be authorized after original permit or permit exemption authorization has expired; provided, that this procedure shall not be used to extend the original permit or permit exemption time requirements or to authorize substantial development after the time limits of the original permit or permit exemption. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 14)] Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 188/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. 18.25.740 Extensions – Notice to Ecology. The shoreline administrator shall notify the Department of Ecology in writing of any change to the effective date of a substantial development permit, variance permit or conditional use permit as authorized by this section, with an explanation of the basis for approval of the change. Any change to the time limits of a permit or permit exemption other than those authorized by this section shall require a new permit application. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 15)] 18.25.750 Notice of decision, reconsideration and appeal. (1) A notice of decision for action on a shoreline substantial development permit, shoreline variance, or shoreline conditional use permit shall be provided to the applicant/proponent and any party of record in accordance with the procedures of Chapter 18.40 JCC and at least 10 days prior to filing such decisions with the Department of Ecology pursuant to WAC 173-27-130. Decisions filed with the Department of Ecology shall contain the following information: (a) A copy of the complete application; (b) Findings and conclusions that establish the basis for the decision including but not limited to identification of shoreline environment designation, applicable master program policies and regulations and the consistency of the project with appropriate review criteria for the type of permit(s); (c) The final decision of the local government; (d) Where applicable, local government shall also file the applicable documents required by SEPA, or in lieu thereof, a statement summarizing the actions and dates of such actions taken under Chapter 43.21C RCW; and (e) When the project has been modified in the course of the local review process, plans or text shall be provided that clearly indicate the final approved plan. (2) A notice of decision for shoreline statements of exemption shall be provided to the applicant/proponent and any party of record. Such notices shall also be filed with the Department of Ecology, pursuant to the requirements of WAC 173-27-050 when the project is subject to one or more of the following federal permitting requirements: (a) A U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 10 permit under the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. (The provisions of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act generally apply to any project occurring on or over navigable waters; specific applicability information should be obtained from the Corps of Engineers.); or (b) A Section 404 permit under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (the provisions of Section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act generally apply to any project which may involve discharge of dredge or fill material to any water or wetland area; specific applicability information should be obtained from the Corps of Engineers). (3) This program shall only establish standing for parties of record for shoreline substantial development permits, shoreline variances, or shoreline conditional use permits. Standing as a party of record is not established by this program for exempt actions; provided, that in such cases standing may be Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 189/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. established through an associated permit process that provides for public notice and provisions for parties of record. (4) The applicant/proponent or any party of record may request reconsideration of any final action by the decision maker within 10 days of notice of the decision. Such requests shall be filed on forms supplied by the county. Grounds for reconsideration must be based upon the content of the written decision. The decision maker is not required to provide a written response or modify his/her original decision. He/she may initiate such action as he/she deems appropriate. The procedure of reconsideration shall not preempt or extend the appeal period for a permit or affect the date of filing with the Department of Ecology, unless the applicant/proponent requests the abeyance of said permit appeal period. (5) Appeals to the Shoreline Hearings Board of a decision on a shoreline substantial development permit, shoreline variance or shoreline conditional use permit may be filed by the applicant/proponent or any aggrieved party pursuant to RCW 90.58.180 within 21 days of filing the final decision by Jefferson County with the Department of Ecology. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 16)] (6) After all local permit administrative appeals or reconsideration periods are complete and the permit documents are amended to incorporate any resulting changes, the County will mail the permit using return receipt requested mail to the Department of Ecology regional office and the Office of the Attorney General. Projects that require both Conditional Use Permits and or Variances shall be mailed simultaneously with any Substantial Development Permits for the project. (i) The permit and documentation of the final local decision will be mailed together with the complete permit application; a findings and conclusions letter; a permit data form (cover sheet); and applicable SEPA documents. (ii) Consistent with RCW 90.58.140(6), the state’s Shorelines Hearings Board twenty-one (21) day appeal period starts with the date of filing, which is defined below: (a) For projects that only require a Substantial Development Permit: the date that Ecology receives the County decision. (b) For a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) or Variance: the date that Ecology’s decision on the CUP or Variance is transmitted to the applicant and the County. (c) For SDPs simultaneously mailed with a CUP or VAR to Ecology: the date that Ecology’s decision on the CUP or Variance is transmitted to the applicant and the County. 18.25.760 Initiation of development. (1) Development pursuant to a shoreline substantial development permit, shoreline variance, or conditional use shall not begin and shall not be authorized until 21 days after the “date of filing” or until all review proceedings before the Shoreline Hearings Board have terminated. (2) Date of Filing. “Date of filing” of a substantial development permit is the date of actual receipt of the decision by the Department of Ecology. The “date of filing” for a shoreline variance or shoreline conditional use permit shall mean the date the permit decision rendered by the Department of Ecology is transmitted by the Department of Ecology to the county and the applicant/proponent. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 17)] Commented [LG119]: 2017 d Periodic Checklist Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 190/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. 18.25.770 Permit revisions. (1) A permit revision is required whenever the applicant/proponent proposes substantive changes to the design, terms or conditions of a project from that which is approved in the permit. Changes are substantive if they materially alter the project in a manner that relates to its conformance to the terms and conditions of the permit, this program or the Act. Changes that are not substantive in effect do not require a permit revision. (2) An application for a revision to a shoreline permit shall be submitted to the administrator. The application shall include detailed plans and text describing the proposed changes. The county decision maker that approved the original permit may approve the request upon a finding that the proposed changes are within the scope and intent of the original permit, and are consistent with this program and the Act. (3) “Within the scope and intent of the original permit” means all of the following: (a) No additional overwater construction is involved except that a pier, dock or floating structure may be increased by 10 percent over that approved under the original permit; (b) Ground area coverage and/or height may be increased a maximum of 10 percent over that approved under the original permit; provided, that the revised permit does not authorize development to exceed the height, lot coverage, setback or any other requirements of this program except as authorized under a variance granted for the original development; (c) Additional or revised landscaping is consistent with any conditions attached to the original permit and with this program; (d) The use authorized pursuant to the original permit is not changed; and (e) The revision will not cause adverse environmental impacts beyond those originally authorized in the permit. (4) Revisions to shoreline permits may be authorized after the original permit authorization has expired. Revisions made after the expiration of the original permit shall be limited to changes that are consistent with this program and that would not require a permit under this program. If the proposed change is a substantial development as defined by this program, then a new permit is required. The provisions of this paragraph shall not be used to extend the time requirements or to authorize substantial development beyond the time limits or scope of the original permit. (5) A new permit shall be required if the proposed revision and any previously approved revisions in combination would constitute development beyond the scope and intent of the original permit. (6) Upon approval of a permit revision, the decision maker shall file with the Department of Ecology a copy of the revised site plan and a detailed description of the authorized changes to the original permit together with a final ruling and findings supporting the decision based on the requirements of this section. In addition, the decision maker shall notify parties of record of the action. (a) If the proposed revision is to a development for which a shoreline conditional use or variance was issued, the decision maker shall submit the revision to the Department of Ecology for approval with conditions or denial, and shall indicate that the revision is being submitted under the Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 191/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. requirements of this paragraph. Under the requirements of WAC 173-27-110(6), the Department of Ecology shall render and transmit to the decision maker and the applicant/proponent its final decision within 15 days of the date of the Department of Ecology’s receipt of the submittal from the decision maker. The decision maker shall notify parties on record of the Department of Ecology’s final decision. Appeals of a decision of the Department of Ecology shall be filed in accordance with the provisions of WAC 173-27-110(8). [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 18)] 18.25.780 Rescission and modification. (1) Any shoreline permit granted pursuant to this program may be rescinded or modified upon a finding by the hearing examiner that the permittee or his/her successors in interest have not complied with conditions attached thereto. A specific monitoring plan may be required as a condition of a permit with specific reporting requirements. If the monitoring plan is not implemented, the permittee may be found to be noncompliant. The results of a monitoring plan may show a development to be out of compliance with specific performance standards, which may be the basis for findings of noncompliance. (2) The administrator shall initiate rescission or modification proceedings by serving written notice of noncompliance to the permittee or his/her successors and notifying parties of record at the original address provided in application review files. (3) The hearing examiner shall hold a public hearing no sooner than 15 days following such service of notice, unless the applicant/proponent files notice of intent to comply and the administrator grants a specific schedule for compliance. If compliance is not achieved, the administrator shall schedule a public hearing before the hearing examiner. Upon considering written and oral testimony taken at the hearing, the hearing examiner shall make a decision in accordance with the above procedure for shoreline permits. (4) These provisions do not limit the administrator, the prosecuting attorney, the Department of Ecology or the Attorney General from administrative, civil, injunctive, declaratory or other remedies provided by law, or from abatement or other remedies. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 19)] 18.25.790 Violations and penalties. (1) In addition to incurring civil liability under JCC 18.50.110 and RCW 90.58.210, pursuant to RCW 90.58.220, any person found to have willfully engaged in activities on shorelines of the state in violation of the provisions of the Act or of this program, or other regulations adopted pursuant thereto, shall be punished by: (a) A fine of not less than $25.00 or more than $1,000; (b) Imprisonment in the county jail for not more than 90 days; or (c) Both such fine and imprisonment; provided, that the fine for the third and all subsequent violations in any five-year period shall not be less than $500.00 nor more than $10,000; provided further, that fines for violations of RCW 90.58.550, or any rule adopted thereunder, shall be determined under RCW 90.58.560. (2) Any person who willfully violates any court order or injunction issued pursuant to this program shall be subject to a fine or imprisonment or both, neither of which shall exceed the maximum fine or imprisonment stated in RCW 9.92.020 as currently enacted or as may hereafter be amended. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 20)] Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 192/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. 18.25.800 Remedies. (1) The Jefferson County prosecuting attorney, or administrator, where authorized, shall bring such injunctive, declaratory, or other actions as are necessary to ensure that no uses are made of the shorelines of the state located within Jefferson County in conflict with the provisions of this program, the Act, or other regulations adopted pursuant thereto, and to otherwise enforce the provisions of this program. (2) Any person subject to the regulatory provisions of this program or the Act who violates any provision thereof, or permit or permit condition issued pursuant thereto, shall be liable for all damage to public or private property arising from such violation, including the cost of restoring the affected area to its conditions prior to violation. The Jefferson County prosecuting attorney shall bring suit for damages under this section on their own behalf and on the behalf of all persons similarly situated. If liability has been established for the cost of restoring an area affected by a violation, the court shall make provision to assure that restoration will be accomplished within a reasonable time at the expense of the violator. In addition to such relief, including money damages, the court in its discretion may award attorney’s fees and costs of the suit to the prevailing party. (3) A person who fails to conform to the terms of a substantial development permit, conditional use permit or variance issued under RCW 90.58.140, who undertakes a development or use on shorelines of the state without first obtaining a permit, or who fails to comply with a cease and desist order may be subject to a civil penalty. The penalty shall be imposed pursuant to the procedure set forth in WAC 173- 27-280 and become due and recovered as set forth in WAC 173-27-290(3) and (4). Persons incurring a penalty may appeal the same to the Shoreline Hearings Board or the BOCC pursuant to WAC 173-27- 290(1) and (2). [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 21)] 18.25.810 Abatement. Structures or development on shorelines considered by the administrator to present a hazard or other public nuisance to persons, properties or natural features may be abated by the county under the applicable provisions of the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1997 Edition or successor as adopted by Jefferson County, or by other appropriate means. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 22)] 18.25.820 Third-party review. The administrator shall determine when third-party review shall be required. Third-party review requires any technical studies or inventories provided by the project proponent to be reviewed by an independent third party, paid for by the project proponent, but hired by the administrator. A qualified professional shall conduct third-party review. In determining the need for third-party review, the administrator shall base his/her decision upon, but shall not be limited to, such factors as whether there has been incomplete submittal of data or apparently inadequate design work, whether the project is large scale, or whether the development site is complex. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 23)] 18.25.830 Inspections. Whenever it is necessary to make an inspection to enforce any of the provisions of this master program or whenever the administrator has reasonable cause to believe that there exists in any building, or upon any premises, any condition that constitutes a violation of this master program, the administrator shall take any action authorized by law. The Jefferson County prosecuting attorney shall provide assistance to the administrator in obtaining administrative search warrants or other legal remedies when necessary. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 24)] Commented [LG120]: 2010 a periodic checklist; optional amendment. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 193/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. 18.25.840 Master program review amendments and appeals. Pursuant to RCW 90.58.190 and 36.70A.280The County will conduct the SMP periodic review process consistent with requirements of RCW 90.58.080 and WAC 173-26-090. The County may also consider SMP revisions as a locally-initiated amendment per WAC 173-26-090. Pursuant to RCW 90.58.190 and 36.70A.290, a decision by the Jefferson County board of county commissioners to amend this master program shall not constitute a final appealable decision until the Department of Ecology has made a decision to approve, reject, or modify the proposed amendment. Following the decisionAmendments shall be effective 14 days from Ecology’s written notice of final action. Following the final action of the Department of Ecology regarding the proposed amendment, the decision may be appealed to the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 25)] 18.25.850 Fees. Required fees for all shoreline substantial development permits, shoreline conditional use permits, shoreline variances, statements of exemption, appeals, preapplication conferences and other required approvals shall be paid to the county at the time of application in accordance with the Jefferson County unified fee schedule in effect at that time. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 26)] 18.25.860 Transfer of permits. An approved substantial development permit, conditional use permit or variance permit may be transferred from the original project proponent to any successor in interest to the project proponent; provided, that all of the conditions and requirements of the approved permit or variance shall continue in effect as long as the use or activity is pursued or the structure exists unless the terms of the substantial development permit, conditional use permit, or variance permit are modified in accordance with the relevant provisions of this master program. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Art. X § 27)] Article XI. Official Shoreline MapMapping 18.25.870 Official shoreline map. The official shoreline map shows the Article IV shoreline environment designations (SEDs) that apply to each segment of the shoreline planning area under SMP jurisdiction. It does not necessarily identify or depict the precise lateral extent of shoreline jurisdiction or all associated wetlands. The lateral extent of the shoreline jurisdiction at the parcel level shall be determined on a case-by-case basis at the time a shoreline use/development is proposed. The actual extent of shoreline jurisdiction requires a site- specific evaluation to identify the location of the ordinary high water mark and any associated wetlands. The county shall maintain a Geographic Information Systems database that depicts the coordinates for locating the upstream extent of shoreline jurisdiction (that is, the location where the mean annual stream flow is at least 20 cubic feet per second). The database shall also show the limits of the floodplain, floodway, and channel migration zones, and such information shall be used, along with site- specific information on the location of the ordinary high water mark and associated wetlands, to determine the lateral extent of shoreline jurisdiction on a parcel-by-parcel basis. The database shall be updated regularly as new information is made available and the public shall have access to the database upon request. Appendix A, attached to the ordinance codified in this chapter, depicts the SEDs in two formats: (1) Official Shoreline Map. An overview map showing all of Jefferson County (image sized for large format printing). Commented [LG121]: 2017 h Periodic Checklist Commented [LG122]: 2010 a periodic checklist; optional amendment. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 194/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (2) A collection of 18 break-out maps at closer range to allow greater details (images sized for 11-inch by 17-inch printing). Western Jefferson County is depicted in a single break-out map (Map No. 18). Eastern Jefferson County is broken into separate images (Map Nos. 1 through 17) as shown in Appendix A of the ordinance codified in this chapter. [Ord. 7-13 Exh. A (Appx. A)] 18.25.880 Maps Illustrating SED Allowance for In-Water Finfish Aquaculture As established by 18.25.440(3) and summarized in Figure 18.25.440, approximate siting locations for the SED Allowance for In-Water Finfish Aquaculture are illustrated in the following four maps showing the areas of Strait of Juan de Fuca, Glen Cove/Port Townsend Bay, Mats Mats/Oak Bay, and Port Ludlow/Ludlow Bay. [moved from prior section] Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 195/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 196/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 197/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 198/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 199/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. 1 Wording from WAC 173-27-060(3). 18.25.890 List of SMP Waterbodies As established by 18.25.200, this SMP addresses approximately 250 miles of marine shoreline and approximately 22 miles of lakeshore on 14 lakes that are designated as shorelines of the state in Jefferson County. All marine shorelines are regulated by this SMP. Stream, river, and lake shorelines that meet the definitions of shorelines of the state are regulated in this SMP. See Figure 18.25.890 -1 and Figure 18.25.890 -2. The Inventory and Characterization Report Section 1.3.2 and Appendix D provide shoreline descriptions and may be consulted. In the case of discrepancies or changed conditions, the application of state definitions shall prevail over the list. Figure 18.25.890 -1. Streams or Rivers Stream or River* USGS 7.5 Minute Series Map where Point is Located Alta Creek Kimta Peak Alta Creek, U T Bob Creek and Kimta Peak Alta Creek, U T Kimta Peak Anderson Creek Anderson Creek Big Creek Bunch Lake Big Creek, U T Bunch Lake Big Quilcene River Mount Townsend Blue Glacier Mount Olympus Bob Creek Bob Creek Bogachiel River Indian Pass Buckinghorse Creek Chimney Peak Cabin Creek Eldon Cameron Creek Wellesley Peak Cannings Creek Bunch Lake Canoe Creek Finley Creek Clearwater River - From confluence with U T Kloochman Rock Clearwater River, U T Kloochman Rock Clearwater River, U T Kloochman Rock Crazy Creek Mount Steel Cream Lake Creek Mount Queets Delabarre Creek Chimney Peak Delabarre Creek, U T Mount Christie Dosewallips River Wellesley Peak Dosewallips River, W F Mount Steel Duckabush River Mount Steel Duckabush River, U T The Brothers Commented [LG123]: 2007 b Periodic Checklist Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 200/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. Stream or River* USGS 7.5 Minute Series Map where Point is Located Dungeness River Mount Deception Elip Creek Kimta Peak Elk Lick Creek Mount Steel Elkhorn River Mount Queets Elwha River Mount Queets Elwha River, U T Mount Queets Finley Creek Finley Creek Finley Creek, U T Finley Creek Fox Creek Bunch Lake Geoduck Creek Mount Christie Geoduck Creek, U T Mount Christie Godkin Creek Chimney Peak Godkin Creek, U T Chimney Peak Godkin Creek, U T Chimney Peak Goldie River Mount Queets Goldie River, U T Mount Queets Goldie River, U T Mount Queets Goldie River, U T Mount Queets Goldie River, U T Mount Queets Graves Creek Mount Hoquiam Gray Wolf River Wellesley Peak Hades Creek Winfield Creek Harlow Creek Salmon River West Hayes River Chimney Peak Hee Haw Creek Kimta Peak Hee Haw River Kimta Peak Hell Roaring Creek, E F Anderson Creek Hoh River Mount Olympus Hoh River * Owl Mountain Hoh River, S F Mount Olympus Hoh River, S F, U T Bob Creek Hoh River, S F, U T Kloochman Rock Hoh River, S F, U T Mount Olympus Hoh River, S F, U T Mount Tom Hoh River, S F, U T Mount Tom Hoh River, U T Mount Queets Hoh River, U T Mount Tom Hoh River, U T Mount Tom Hoh River, U T Owl Mountain Hoh River, U T Owl Mountain Hook Branch Creek Matheny Ridge Howe Creek Bunch Lake Hungry Creek The Brothers Ice River Mount Olympus Irely Creek Bunch Lake Jackson Creek Owl Mountain Jeffers Glacier Mount Olympus Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 201/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. Stream or River* USGS 7.5 Minute Series Map where Point is Located Jemrod Creek Mount Olympus Kalaloch Creek, E F Kalaloch Ridge Kimta Creek Kimta Peak Kunamakst Creek Stequaleho Creek Lena Creek The Brothers Litchy Creek Mount Hoquiam Litchy Creek, U T Mount Hoquiam Long Creek Mount Queets Long Creek, U T Hurricane Hill Lost River Mc Cartney Peak Matheny Creek Finley Creek Matheny Creek, U T Finley Creek Matheny Creek, U T Matheny Ridge Matheny Creek, U T Matheny Ridge Mckinnon Creek Salmon River West Miller Creek, E F Christmas Creek Mount Tom Creek - From its' confluence with U T Mount Tom Mount Tom Creek, U T Mount Tom Mount Tom Creek, U T Mount Tom Mount Tom Creek, U T Mount Tom Mud Creek Salmon River East Murphy Creek Quillayute Prairie Nolan Creek Christmas Creek Noname Creek Chimney Peak O'Neil Creek Mount Olson Paradise Creek Bob Creek Paull Creek Mount Olympus Promise Creek Kimta Peak Pyrites Creek Chimney Peak Queets River Mount Queets Queets River * Kloochman Rock Queets River, U T Bob Creek Queets River, U T Kimta Peak Queets River, U T Mount Queets Queets River, U T Mount Queets Queets River, U T Mount Queets Queets River, U T Salmon River East Quinault River Mount Steel Quinault River * Bunch Lake Quinault River, N F Mount Christie Quinault River, N F, U T Mount Christie Quinault River, N F, U T Mount Christie Quinault River, U T Mount Hoquiam Quinault River, U T Mount Olson Rocky Brook Brinnon Royal Creek Mount Deception Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 202/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. Stream or River* USGS 7.5 Minute Series Map where Point is Located Rustler Creek Chimney Peak Rustler Creek, U T Mount Christie Rustler Creek, U T Mount Christie Rustler Creek, U T Mount Christie Saghalie Creek Mount Christie Salmon River, M F Matheny Ridge Salmon River, N F Matheny Ridge Sams River Finley Creek Sams River, U T Matheny Ridge Seattle Creek Mount Christie Silt River Wellesley Peak Silt River, U T Wellesley Peak Solleks River Kloochman Rock Solleks River, U T Stequaleho Creek Stalding Creek Kimta Peak Stequaleho Creek Stequaleho Creek Tacoma Creek Salmon River West Three Prune Creek Kimta Peak Townsend Creek Mount Walker Tsheltshy Creek Bunch Lake Tshletshy Creek, U T Bob Creek Tshletshy Creek, U T Bob Creek Tshletshy Creek, U T Bob Creek Tshletshy Creek, U T Bob Creek Tshletshy Creek, U T Bob Creek Tshletshy Creek, U T Kloochman Rock Tumwata Creek Spruce Mountain Tunnel Creek Mount Townsend Tunnel Creek, U T Mount Townsend Twin Creek Spruce Mountain Upper O'Neil Creek Chimney Peak White Glacier Mount Olympus Wild Rose Creek Bunch Lake Wynoochee River Mount Hoquiam * indicates shoreline of statewide significance. B = Branch; E = East; F = Fork; M = Middle; N = North; P = Prong; S = South; T = Tributary; U = Unnamed; W = West Figure 18.25.890 -2. Lakes Lake Name Shoreline of the State: Status Anderson Shoreline of the State Beausite Shoreline of the State Crocker Shoreline of the State Gibbs Shoreline of the State Leland Shoreline of the State Lords Shoreline of the State Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 203/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. Lake Name Shoreline of the State: Status Ludlow Shoreline of the State Peterson Shoreline of the State Rice Shoreline of the State Sandy Shore Shoreline of the State Tarboo Shoreline of the State Teal Shoreline of the State Mill Pond Shoreline of the State Wahl Shoreline of the State Article XII. Ocean Management 18.25.900 Applicability and Administration (1) Applicability – The ocean use policies, regulations, and permitting procedures apply as follow: (a) Ocean Resources Management Act (ORMA; RCW 43.143). Ocean uses and developments proposed within the ORMA geographical area must be consistent with ocean use policies and regulations and reviewed using the additional approval criteria of this section. The applicable ORMA geographical area covers Washington coastal waters of the Pacific Ocean from Cape Flattery south to Cape Disappointment, from mean high tide seaward two hundred miles. (i) Geographic Application. The Ocean Management provision of this section apply to Pacific Ocean shorelines of statewide significance coastal waters and those associated shorelands located within Jefferson County, except for areas that are under exclusive federal jurisdiction as established through federal or state statutes including Olympic National Park. (b) Marine Spatial Plan (MSP). New ocean uses and developments proposed within the MSP study area must be consistent with the ocean use policies, regulations, and permitting procedures of this section. The MSP study area covers marine waters of the Pacific Ocean within state waters (from OHWM out to 3 nautical miles). (i) The MSP applies to a proposed project only if all three of the following criteria are met: • occurs within the geographic boundaries of the MSP study area; • will adversely impact renewable resources or existing ocean uses; and • is a ‘new use’, as defined by the MSP. (ii) All new ocean uses proposed within the MSP study area must be consistent with the protection standards for Important, Sensitive, and Unique areas (ISUs) and Fisheries and reviewed using the additional process requirements for new ocean use proposals. (iii) Applicability of ISU protection standards. The state has developed maps of ISUs using the best available data at the time of the MSP development. These maps are intended to assist applicants in identifying where ISUs exist. As finer resolution or updated data becomes available, the state may update the ISU maps, which may include adding, deleting or updating the distribution of an ISU. However, ISU protection standards will apply to any ISU, wherever it is identified in state waters. It is the responsibility of applicants to verify whether ISUs exist in their proposed new ocean use project area and to demonstrate protection standards will be met. (2) Ocean use administration. Additional ORMA approval criteria for ocean uses and developments. In addition to the otherwise required shoreline substantial development, conditional use, or variance approval criteria, newly proposed ocean uses or development shall meet or exceed this additional approval criteria: Commented [LG124]: Respond to October 2020 Ecology Checklist addressing 2018 Marine Spatial Plan Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 204/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (a) There is a demonstrated significant local, state, or national need for the proposed use or activity; (b) There is no reasonable alternative to meet the public need for the proposed use or activity; (c) There will be no likely long-term significant adverse impacts to coastal or marine resources or uses; (d) All reasonable steps are taken to avoid and minimize adverse environmental impacts, with special protection provided for the marine life and resources of the Olympic National Park; (e) All reasonable steps are taken to avoid and minimize adverse social and economic impacts, including impacts on aquaculture, recreation, tourism, navigation, air quality, and recreational, commercial, and tribal fishing; (f) Compensation is provided to mitigate adverse impacts to coastal resources or uses; (g) Plans and sufficient performance bonding are provided to ensure that the site will be rehabilitated after the use or activity is completed; and (h) The use or activity complies with all applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations. (3) Additional MSP procedural requirements for new ocean use proposals. In addition to the otherwise required shoreline substantial development, conditional use, or variance permit procedural requirement, MSP defined new ocean use proposals shall include the following: (a) Pre-application Meeting. Prior to submitting any applications for shoreline permits for new ocean uses or developments the applicant will participate in at least one pre- application meeting which may be consolidated and coordinated with all local, state, and federal agencies. During the pre-application stage: (i) The applicant should use the MSP to understand potential use and resource conflicts, including review of the baseline data, maps, analyses, and management framework. This information can assist applicants in avoiding and minimizing impacts to resources and uses through project siting and design. (ii) The applicant should provide required data and information about the project, and identify and coordinate with stakeholder groups as well as other governments, including state, tribal, and federal government entities. (iii) The applicant should identify state and local policies, procedures, and requirements, including those referenced in the Marine Spatial Plan. (b) Inventory – Review adequacy of site-specific inventory and respond to requests for additional data or studies. (c) Effects Analysis – Submit an effects evaluation (See Section 4.5 of the MSP) which includes proposed mitigation measures, and best management practices. (d) Plans – Submit proposed construction and operation plans, including adequacy of prevention, monitoring, and response plans. (e) Coordination – Continue to coordinate with government entities (local, state, tribal, and federal agencies), stakeholders (representatives from fishing, aquaculture, maritime commerce, conservation, tourism, recreation), and the Washington Coastal Marine Advisory Council (WCMAC), and the public in all aspects of project development and review. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 205/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. 18.25.910 Ocean Management Policies (1) Applicability. These ocean management policies and their implementing regulations will be used in evaluating ocean uses, developments, and activities proposed in coastal waters subject to ORMA. These provisions augment the other requirements of this SMP. They are not intended to regulate recreational uses or currently existing commercial uses involving fishing or other renewable marine or ocean resources. (2) These general ocean management policies are applicable to all shoreline permits for newly proposed ocean uses, their services, distribution, and supply activities and their associated facilities. (a) Ocean uses and activities that will not adversely impact renewable resources shall be given priority over those that will. Correspondingly, ocean uses that will have less adverse impacts on renewable resources shall be given priority over uses that will have greater adverse impacts. (b) Ocean uses that will have less adverse social and economic impacts on coastal uses and communities should be given priority over uses and activities that will have more such impacts. When the adverse impacts are generally equal, the ocean use that has less probable occurrence of a disaster should be given priority. (c) The alternatives considered to meet a public need for a proposed use should be commensurate with the need for the proposed use. For example, if there is a demonstrated national need for a proposed use, then national alternatives should be considered. (d) For ocean uses and activities, SEPA shall be applied consistent with WAC 197-11-060 (4)(e) and 197-11-792 (2)(c). The determination of significant adverse impacts should be consistent with WAC 197-11-330(3) and 197-11-794. The sequence of actions described in WAC 197-11-768 should be used as an order of preference in evaluating steps to avoid and minimize adverse impacts. (e) Impacts on commercial resources, such as the crab fishery, on noncommercial resources, such as environmentally critical and sensitive habitats, and on coastal uses, such as loss of equipment or loss of a fishing season, should be considered in determining compensation to mitigate adverse environmental, social and economic impacts to coastal resources and uses. (f) Allocation of compensation to mitigate adverse impacts to coastal resources or uses should be based on the magnitude and/or degree of impact on the resource, jurisdiction and use. (g) Rehabilitation plans and bonds prepared for ocean uses should address the effects of planned and unanticipated closures, completion of the activity, reasonably anticipated disasters, inflation, new technology, and new information about the environmental impacts to ensure that state of the art technology and methods are used. (h) Ocean uses and their associated coastal or upland facilities should be located, designed and operated to prevent, avoid, and minimize adverse impacts on migration routes and habitat areas of species listed as endangered or threatened, environmentally critical and sensitive habitats such as breeding, spawning, nursery, foraging areas and wetlands, and areas of high productivity for marine biota such as upwelling and estuaries. (i) Ocean uses should be located to avoid adverse impacts on proposed or existing environmental and scientific preserves and sanctuaries, parks, and designated recreation areas. (j) Ocean uses and their associated facilities should be located and designed to avoid and minimize adverse impacts on historic or culturally significant sites in compliance with chapter 27.34 RCW. Permits in general should contain special provisions that require permittees to Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 206/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. comply with chapter 27.53 RCW if any archaeological sites or archaeological objects such as artifacts and shipwrecks are discovered. (k) Ocean uses and their distribution, service, and supply vessels and aircraft should be located, designed, and operated in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts on fishing grounds, aquatic lands, or other renewable resource ocean use areas during the established, traditional, and recognized times they are used or when the resource could be adversely impacted. (l) Ocean use service, supply, and distribution vessels and aircraft should be routed to avoid environmentally critical and sensitive habitats such as sea stacks and wetlands, preserves, sanctuaries, bird colonies, and migration routes, during critical times those areas or species could be affected. (m) In locating and designing associated onshore facilities, special attention should be given to the environment, the characteristics of the use, and the impact of a probable disaster, in order to assure adjacent uses, habitats, and communities’ adequate protection from explosions, spills, and other disasters. (n) Ocean uses and their associated facilities should be located and designed to minimize impacts on existing water dependent businesses and existing land transportation routes to the maximum extent feasible. (o) Onshore facilities associated with ocean uses should be located in communities where there is adequate sewer, water, power, and streets. Within those communities, if space is available at existing marine terminals, the onshore facilities should be located there. (p) Attention should be given to the scheduling and method of constructing ocean use facilities and the location of temporary construction facilities to minimize impacts on tourism, recreation, commercial fishing, local communities, and the environment. (q) Special attention should be given to the effect that ocean use facilities will have on recreational activities and experiences such as public access, aesthetics, and views. (r) Detrimental effects on air and water quality, tourism, recreation, fishing, aquaculture, navigation, transportation, public infrastructure, public services, and community culture should be considered in avoiding and minimizing adverse social and economic impacts. (s) Special attention should be given to designs and methods that prevent, avoid, and minimize adverse impacts such as noise, light, temperature changes, turbidity, water pollution and contaminated sediments on the marine, estuarine or upland environment. Such attention should be given particularly during critical migration periods and life stages of marine species and critical oceanographic processes. (t) Pre-project environmental baseline inventories and assessments and monitoring of ocean uses should be required when little is known about the effects on marine and estuarine ecosystems, renewable resource uses and coastal communities or the technology involved is likely to change. (u) Oil or gas exploration, development, or production should be prohibited from Cape Flattery south to Cape Disappointment. (3) The state’s Marine Spatial Plan (MSP) provides a base of scientific information on ocean uses and resources, provides a framework for evaluating new ocean use proposals, and establishes protections for sensitive areas and fisheries. As such, the state’s MSP informed the ocean management provisions of this SMP and should be utilized in their implementation. 18.25.920 Ocean Management Regulations. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 207/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. The following ORMA ocean management regulations apply to all shoreline permits for newly proposed ocean uses, their services, distribution, and supply activities and their associated facilities: (1) Oil and gas exploration, development, and production is prohibited in tidal or submerged lands extending from the mean high tide seaward three miles. (2) Seafloor mining may be allowed consistent with all of the following: (a) The applicant has demonstrated that the location and operation has been designed in a manner that has no detrimental effects on ground fishing, renewable resource uses, beach erosion and accretion processes; and (b) The applicant has provided for mitigation of impacts that accounts for the established habitat recovery rates. (3) Ocean energy producing uses should only be allowed when the applicant has demonstrated the following: (a) The location, construction, and operation has been designed in a manner that has no detrimental effects on beach erosion, accretion, and wave processes; (b) The effect of the project on upwelling and other oceanographic and ecosystem processes have been assessed; and (c) Associated energy distribution facilities and lines are located in existing utility rights of way and corridors, whenever feasible. (4) Ocean disposal uses may be allowed when the applicant has demonstrated the following: (a) Storage, loading, transporting, and disposal of materials shall be done in conformance with local, state, and federal requirements for protection of the environment; (b) The ocean disposal site has been approved by the Washington department of ecology, the Washington department of natural resources, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, as appropriate. Ocean disposal sites for which the primary purpose is habitat enhancement may be located in a wider variety of locations; (c) The Ocean disposal site has been located and designed to prevent, avoid, and minimize adverse impacts on environmentally critical and sensitive habitats, coastal resources and uses, or loss of opportunities for mineral resource development; and (d) Ocean disposal should be sited in areas where the dredge material will provide beneficial use to the greatest extent possible. (5) Ocean transportation uses may be allowed consistent with the following: (a) The applicant has provided an assessment of the impacts the proposed transportation use will have on renewable resource activities such as fishing and on environmentally critical and sensitive habitat areas, environmental and scientific preserves and sanctuaries. (b) When feasible, hazardous materials such as oil, gas, explosives and chemicals, should not be transported through highly productive commercial, tribal, or recreational fishing areas. If no such feasible route exists, the routes used should pose the least environmental risk. (c) Transportation uses should be located or routed to avoid habitat areas of endangered or threatened species, environmentally critical and sensitive habitats, migration routes of marine species and birds, marine sanctuaries and environmental or scientific preserves to the maximum extent feasible. (6) Ocean research uses may be allowed consistent with the following: (a) Other ocean uses occurring in the same area have been identified and potential use conflicts have been minimized. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 208/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (b) Ocean research meeting the definition of "exploration activity" of WAC 173-15-020 shall comply with the requirements of WAC 173-15: Permits for oil or natural gas exploration activities conducted from state marine waters. (c) The project has been located and will be operated in a manner that minimizes intrusion into or disturbance of the coastal waters environment consistent with the purposes of the research and the intent of the general ocean use guidelines. (d) Upon completion or discontinuance of the ocean research the site shall be restored to its original condition to the maximum extent feasible, consistent with the purposes of the research. (e) Ocean research findings should be made available for public dissemination, whenever feasible. (7) Ocean salvage uses may be allowed consistent with the following: (a) Nonemergency marine salvage and historic shipwreck salvage activities should be conducted in a manner that minimizes adverse impacts to the coastal waters environment and renewable resource uses such as fishing. (b) Nonemergency marine salvage and historic shipwreck salvage activities should not be conducted in areas of cultural or historic significance unless part of a scientific effort sanctioned by appropriate governmental agencies. 18.25.930 Important, Sensitive and Unique Areas (ISUs) Designation. The ISUs assign protection standards and definitions for adverse effects for a list of ecological, historic, cultural, and infrastructure areas. The MSP provides maps utilizing the best available data on ISU locations. (1) Ecological ISUs (a) Biogenic Habitats: Aquatic vegetation, corals, and sponges Rocky Reefs (b) Seabird colonies: islands and rocks used for foraging and nesting by seabirds. (c) Pinniped haul-outs (d) Forage fish spawning areas: intertidal areas used for spawning by herring, smelt or other forage fish. (2) Historic, Cultural and Infrastructure ISUs (a) Historic and archaeological sites: Structures or sites over 45 years old that are listed or eligible for listing in local, state or national preservation registers (e.g. shipwrecks or lighthouses); or Artifacts or other material evidence of tribal or historic use or occupation (e.g. burials, village sites, or middens). (b) Buoys and submarine cables: Fixed infrastructure such as navigation or monitoring buoys, fiber optic cables, electrical transmission cables, other fixed monitoring equipment in the marine environment (e.g. hydrophones) and any associated mooring lines, anchors or other equipment. (3) ISU Mapping and Location. The state has developed maps of ISUs intended to assist applicants in identifying where ISUs exist.2 However, ISU protection standards will apply to any ISU, wherever it is identified in state waters. It is the responsibility of applicants to verify whether ISUs exist in their proposed project area and to demonstrate protection standards will be met. (4) ISU Protection standards. New ocean uses should only be allowed when the applicant can demonstrate consistency with the following ISU adverse effects and protection standards: 2 See: https://www.msp.wa.gov/important-sensitive-and-unique-areas-isus/. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 209/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (a) An applicant for proposed new ocean uses involving offshore development must demonstrate that the project will have no adverse effects on an ISU located at the project site and to off-site ISUs potentially affected by the project, using site-specific surveys, scientific data and analysis, which demonstrate either: (i) The current ISU maps do not accurately characterize the resource or use or the project area (mapped or not mapped) does not contain an ISU resource or use; or (ii) The weight of scientific evidence clearly indicates that the project will cause no adverse effects to the resources of the ISU. (A) Adverse effects standards for Ecological ISUs means degradation of ecosystem function and integrity (direct habitat damage, burial of habitat, habitat erosion, and reduction in biological diversity) or degradation of living marine organisms (abundance, individual growth, density, species diversity, and species behavior). (B) Adverse effects standards for historic, cultural or fixed infrastructure ISUs include the following: • Direct impacts from dredging, dumping, or filling; • Alteration, destruction or defacement of historic, archaeological or cultural artifacts; and • Direct impacts from placement or maintenance of new, temporary or permanent structures in areas with existing infrastructure or historic, archaeological or cultural artifacts. (b) Additional buffers may be appropriate to protect ISU resources from adverse effects. Project developers shall consult with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife on recommended buffers for Ecological ISUs associated with their proposed project prior to filing application materials with local or state agencies. Project developers shall consult with the Washington Department of Archaeological and Historical Preservation and tribal preservation officers on further identification and protection of cultural or historical artifacts. (5) Applicants for proposed new ocean uses involving offshore development must consult with WDFW, individuals participating in affected commercial and recreational fisheries, and each of the coastal tribes to identify and understand the proposed project’s potential adverse effects to fisheries and tribal uses. (6) Fisheries Protection standards. New ocean uses involving offshore development shall only be allowed when the applicant can demonstrate that their project meets all of the following standards to protect fisheries located at the project site and nearby from adverse effects: (a) There are no likely long-term significant adverse effects for commercial or recreational fisheries. Adverse effects can be direct, indirect or cumulative. (i) A significant reduction in the access of commercial or recreational fisheries to the resource used by any fishery or a fishing community(s); (ii) A significant increase in the risk to entangle fishing gear; (iii) A significant reduction in navigation safety for commercial and recreational fisheries; and (iv) Environmental harm that significantly reduces quality or quantity of marine resources available for harvest. Jefferson County Code Chapter 18.25 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM Page 210/210 Date of Base Code: The Jefferson County Code is current through Ordinance 06-0817-20, passed August 17, 2020. The Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program is current through Ordinance 07-1216-13, passed December 16, 2013; the SMP became effective February 21, 2014. (b) All reasonable steps are taken to avoid and minimize social and economic impacts to fishing. (i) Avoid adverse social and economic impacts to fishing through proposed project location, design, construction, and operation, such as avoiding heavily used fishing areas. Where adverse impacts to fishing cannot be reasonably avoided, demonstrate how project has minimized impacts; (ii) Minimize the number of and size of anchors. Space structures for greater compatibility with existing uses and bury cables in the seafloor and through the shoreline; Minimize risk of entangling fishing gear from new structures installed in the seafloor or placed in the water. Minimize the displacement of fishers from traditional fishing areas, and the related impact on the travel distance, routing, and navigation safety in order to fish in alternative areas; (iii) Minimize the compression of fishing effort caused by the reduction in the areas normally accessible to fishers; (iv) Minimize the economic impact resulting from the reduction in area available for commercial and recreational fishing for the effected sectors and ports. (v) Limit the number and size of projects located in an area to minimize the impact on a particular port, sector, or fishery; (vi) Consider the distribution of projects and their cumulative effects; and (vii) Other reasonable and relevant considerations as determined by the fisheries consultation process and specifics of the proposed project. Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Appendix A Page Ordinance 07-1216-13 A-2 Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Appendix A Page Ordinance 07-1216-13 A-3 All map images are also available in digital format for more detailed review. [Additional pages inserted here for maps 1 - 18] Discovery Bay £¤101 Contracto rs C re ekGARDINER FFF GGG HHH III JJJ KKK LLL Final 10/31/2011 This m ap is in tended for p lan nin g p urp oses only. T h e O f fic ia l S h ore line M ap sh o w s th e en v iron m en t d es ig n ation sthat a p p ly to e ac h s eg m e n t of the s ho relin e p la n n in g a rea . It d oesnot n ec es s arily id en tify o r d e p ict th e p re c is e late ral ex te n t ofshoreline ju risd ic tio n or a ll a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e late ra l e x ten t ofthe s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion a t th e p a rce l lev el s ha ll b e d eter m ine d o n a ca se -by -c a se ba sis at th e tim e a s h ore lin e d ev elo p m en t isproposed. T h e a ctu al ex te n t of sh or elin e ju risd ic tio n req u ires asite-sp ec ific ev a lu a tio n to id e n tify th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a n y a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e C o u n ty sh a ll m a in tain a G e og rap h ic In fo rm a tion S y ste m sdatabase th a t d ep ic ts th e c oord in a tes for lo ca tin g th e u p s trea mextent o f s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion (th a t is, th e lo ca tion w h ere th e m ea nannual stre am flow is a t lea st 2 0 c u b ic fee t p e r se c on d ). T h edatabase s h a ll also s ho w th e lim its of th e floo d p lain , flo od w a y , an dchannel m igra tion z on es , a n d s u c h in f orm ation s h all b e u se d , a lo n gwith site-s p ec ific in form a tion on th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a ss oc ia ted w etla n d s , to d ete rm in e th e la tera l ex ten tof s h orelin e ju ris d iction o n a p a rc el-by -p a rc el ba sis. T h e d ata ba s eshall be u p d ate d re gu la rly a s n e w in fo rm a tio n is m ad e a v aila ble a n dthe p u blic sh a ll h a v e a c ce ss to th e d ata ba s e u p on re qu e st. File: Q:\MapDocs\DCD\SMP2011\SED2011_Root.mxdPrepared By: Doug Noltemeier, GISPDate: November 15, 2011Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet© 2011 Jefferson County GISDisclaimer Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes nowarranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited bythe method and accuracy of its collection. Jefferson County, Washington Shoreline Environmental Designation A q u a t ic P r io r it y A q u a t ic N a tu r a l C o n se r v a nc y Sh o r elin e R e sid en tia l H ig h In t en sity N A M a r ine Sh o r elin e P la n n in g A r e a P r io r it y A q u a t ic Pa r c els Urban Growth Boundary Port Townsend SMP M a p B o u n d a r y E NW NE SESW Clallam County Kitsap CountyMason CountyGrays Harbor County 216 7 111016 1718 1 :3 2 ,3 3 0 Map # 1. Gardiner 0 0 .4 5 0 .90.2 25 M ile s Strait of Juan De Fuca Discovery Bay £¤101 ?@20 ?@19 Fort Townsend State ParkContractors C reekFOURCORNERSADELMA BEACH GLENCOVE CAPEGEORGE EEE FFF GGG HHH KKK LLL CCC Port Townsend SMP Final 10/31/2011 This m ap is in tended for p lan nin g p urp oses only. T h e O f fic ia l S h ore line M ap sh o w s th e en v iron m en t d es ig n ation sthat a p p ly to e ac h s eg m e n t of the s ho relin e p la n n in g a rea . It d oesnot n ec es s arily id en tify o r d e p ict th e p re c is e late ral ex te n t ofshoreline ju risd ic tio n or a ll a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e late ra l e x ten t ofthe s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion a t th e p a rce l lev el s ha ll b e d eter m ine d o n a ca se -by -c a se ba sis at th e tim e a s h ore lin e d ev elo p m en t isproposed. T h e a ctu al ex te n t of sh or elin e ju risd ic tio n req u ires asite-sp ec ific ev a lu a tio n to id e n tify th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a n y a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e C o u n ty sh a ll m a in tain a G e og rap h ic In fo rm a tion S y ste m sdatabase th a t d ep ic ts th e c oord in a tes for lo ca tin g th e u p s trea mextent o f s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion (th a t is, th e lo ca tion w h ere th e m ea nannual stre am flow is a t lea st 2 0 c u b ic fee t p e r se c on d ). T h edatabase s h a ll also s ho w th e lim its of th e floo d p lain , flo od w a y , an dchannel m igra tion z on es , a n d s u c h in f orm ation s h all b e u se d , a lo n gwith site-s p ec ific in form a tion on th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a ss oc ia ted w etla n d s , to d ete rm in e th e la tera l ex ten tof s h orelin e ju ris d iction o n a p a rc el-by -p a rc el ba sis. T h e d ata ba s eshall be u p d ate d re gu la rly a s n e w in fo rm a tio n is m ad e a v aila ble a n dthe p u blic sh a ll h a v e a c ce ss to th e d ata ba s e u p on re qu e st. File: Q:\MapDocs\DCD\SMP2011\SED2011_Root.mxdPrepared By: Doug Noltemeier, GISPDate: November 15, 2011Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet© 2011 Jefferson County GISDisclaimer Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes nowarranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited bythe method and accuracy of its collection. Jefferson County, Washington Shoreline Environmental Designation A q u a t ic P r io r it y A q u a t ic N a tu r a l C o n se r v a nc y Sh o r elin e R e sid en tia l H ig h In t en sity N A M a r ine Sh o r elin e P la n n in g A r e a P r io r it y A q u a t ic Pa r c els Urban Growth Boundary Port Townsend SMP M a p B o u n d a r y E NW NE SESW Clallam County Kitsap CountyMason CountyGrays Harbor County 216 7 111016 1718 1 :3 6 ,7 3 0 Map # 2. Quimper 0 0 .5 5 1 .10.2 75 M ile s Port Townsend Bay ?@20 ?@19 Fort Townsend State Park IRONDALE FOURCORNERSADELMA BEACH KALAPOINT GLENCOVE BBB HHH AAA CCC PortHadlock/IrondaleUGA Port Townsend SMP Final 10/31/2011 This m ap is in tended for p lan nin g p urp oses only. T h e O f fic ia l S h ore line M ap sh o w s th e en v iron m en t d es ig n ation sthat a p p ly to e ac h s eg m e n t of the s ho relin e p la n n in g a rea . It d oesnot n ec es s arily id en tify o r d e p ict th e p re c is e late ral ex te n t ofshoreline ju risd ic tio n or a ll a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e late ra l e x ten t ofthe s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion a t th e p a rce l lev el s ha ll b e d eter m ine d o n a ca se -by -c a se ba sis at th e tim e a s h ore lin e d ev elo p m en t isproposed. T h e a ctu al ex te n t of sh or elin e ju risd ic tio n req u ires asite-sp ec ific ev a lu a tio n to id e n tify th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a n y a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e C o u n ty sh a ll m a in tain a G e og rap h ic In fo rm a tion S y ste m sdatabase th a t d ep ic ts th e c oord in a tes for lo ca tin g th e u p s trea mextent o f s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion (th a t is, th e lo ca tion w h ere th e m ea nannual stre am flow is a t lea st 2 0 c u b ic fee t p e r se c on d ). T h edatabase s h a ll also s ho w th e lim its of th e floo d p lain , flo od w a y , an dchannel m igra tion z on es , a n d s u c h in f orm ation s h all b e u se d , a lo n gwith site-s p ec ific in form a tion on th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a ss oc ia ted w etla n d s , to d ete rm in e th e la tera l ex ten tof s h orelin e ju ris d iction o n a p a rc el-by -p a rc el ba sis. T h e d ata ba s eshall be u p d ate d re gu la rly a s n e w in fo rm a tio n is m ad e a v aila ble a n dthe p u blic sh a ll h a v e a c ce ss to th e d ata ba s e u p on re qu e st. File: Q:\MapDocs\DCD\SMP2011\SED2011_Root.mxdPrepared By: Doug Noltemeier, GISPDate: November 15, 2011Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet© 2011 Jefferson County GISDisclaimer Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes nowarranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited bythe method and accuracy of its collection. Jefferson County, Washington Shoreline Environmental Designation A q u a t ic P r io r it y A q u a t ic N a tu r a l C o n se r v a nc y Sh o r elin e R e sid en tia l H ig h In t en sity N A M a r ine Sh o r elin e P la n n in g A r e a P r io r it y A q u a t ic Pa r c els Urban Growth Boundary Port Townsend SMP M a p B o u n d a r y E NW NE SESW Clallam County Kitsap CountyMason CountyGrays Harbor County 216 7 111016 1718 1 :2 2 ,5 5 0 Map # 3. Glen Cove 0 0 .3 0 .60.1 5 M ile s I ndi anIsl andPort Townsend Bay Oak Bay ?@116 ?@19 Bob Bates Fields Fort Townsend State Park Chimacum CreekCHIMACUM WESTVALLEY PORTHADLOCK IRONDALE KALAPOINT BBB GG HH II JJ KK OO PP RR TT UU VV WW XX YY ZZ AAA CCC PortHadlock/IrondaleUGA Final 10/31/2011 This m ap is in tended for p lan nin g p urp oses only. T h e O f fic ia l S h ore line M ap sh o w s th e en v iron m en t d es ig n ation sthat a p p ly to e ac h s eg m e n t of the s ho relin e p la n n in g a rea . It d oesnot n ec es s arily id en tify o r d e p ict th e p re c is e late ral ex te n t ofshoreline ju risd ic tio n or a ll a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e late ra l e x ten t ofthe s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion a t th e p a rce l lev el s ha ll b e d eter m ine d o n a ca se -by -c a se ba sis at th e tim e a s h ore lin e d ev elo p m en t isproposed. T h e a ctu al ex te n t of sh or elin e ju risd ic tio n req u ires asite-sp ec ific ev a lu a tio n to id e n tify th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a n y a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e C o u n ty sh a ll m a in tain a G e og rap h ic In fo rm a tion S y ste m sdatabase th a t d ep ic ts th e c oord in a tes for lo ca tin g th e u p s trea mextent o f s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion (th a t is, th e lo ca tion w h ere th e m ea nannual stre am flow is a t lea st 2 0 c u b ic fee t p e r se c on d ). T h edatabase s h a ll also s ho w th e lim its of th e floo d p lain , flo od w a y , an dchannel m igra tion z on es , a n d s u c h in f orm ation s h all b e u se d , a lo n gwith site-s p ec ific in form a tion on th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a ss oc ia ted w etla n d s , to d ete rm in e th e la tera l ex ten tof s h orelin e ju ris d iction o n a p a rc el-by -p a rc el ba sis. T h e d ata ba s eshall be u p d ate d re gu la rly a s n e w in fo rm a tio n is m ad e a v aila ble a n dthe p u blic sh a ll h a v e a c ce ss to th e d ata ba s e u p on re qu e st. File: Q:\MapDocs\DCD\SMP2011\SED2011_Root.mxdPrepared By: Doug Noltemeier, GISPDate: November 15, 2011Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet© 2011 Jefferson County GISDisclaimer Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes nowarranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited bythe method and accuracy of its collection. Jefferson County, Washington Shoreline Environmental Designation A q u a t ic P r io r it y A q u a t ic N a tu r a l C o n se r v a nc y Sh o r elin e R e sid en tia l H ig h In t en sity N A M a r ine Sh o r elin e P la n n in g A r e a P r io r it y A q u a t ic Pa r c els Urban Growth Boundary Port Townsend SMP M a p B o u n d a r y E NW NE SESW Clallam County Kitsap CountyMason CountyGrays Harbor County 216 7 111016 1718 1 :3 6 ,2 7 0 Map # 4. Tri-Area 0 0 .5 10.2 5 M ile s Marrowst oneI sl andI ndi anI sl andSalish Sea Admiralty Inlet Port Townsend Bay Oak Bay ?@19 ?@116 Fort Flagler State Park Kinney Point State Park PORTHADLOCK FORTFLAGLER SS BBB HH II JJ KK LL MM NN OO PP QQ RR TT UU VV WW XX YY ZZ AAA CCC PortHadlock/IrondaleUGA Final 10/31/2011 This m ap is in tended for p lan nin g p urp oses only. T h e O f fic ia l S h ore line M ap sh o w s th e en v iron m en t d es ig n ation sthat a p p ly to e ac h s eg m e n t of the s ho relin e p la n n in g a rea . It d oesnot n ec es s arily id en tify o r d e p ict th e p re c is e late ral ex te n t ofshoreline ju risd ic tio n or a ll a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e late ra l e x ten t ofthe s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion a t th e p a rce l lev el s ha ll b e d eter m ine d o n a ca se -by -c a se ba sis at th e tim e a s h ore lin e d ev elo p m en t isproposed. T h e a ctu al ex te n t of sh or elin e ju risd ic tio n req u ires asite-sp ec ific ev a lu a tio n to id e n tify th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a n y a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e C o u n ty sh a ll m a in tain a G e og rap h ic In fo rm a tion S y ste m sdatabase th a t d ep ic ts th e c oord in a tes for lo ca tin g th e u p s trea mextent o f s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion (th a t is, th e lo ca tion w h ere th e m ea nannual stre am flow is a t lea st 2 0 c u b ic fee t p e r se c on d ). T h edatabase s h a ll also s ho w th e lim its of th e floo d p lain , flo od w a y , an dchannel m igra tion z on es , a n d s u c h in f orm ation s h all b e u se d , a lo n gwith site-s p ec ific in form a tion on th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a ss oc ia ted w etla n d s , to d ete rm in e th e la tera l ex ten tof s h orelin e ju ris d iction o n a p a rc el-by -p a rc el ba sis. T h e d ata ba s eshall be u p d ate d re gu la rly a s n e w in fo rm a tio n is m ad e a v aila ble a n dthe p u blic sh a ll h a v e a c ce ss to th e d ata ba s e u p on re qu e st. File: Q:\MapDocs\DCD\SMP2011\SED2011_Root.mxdPrepared By: Doug Noltemeier, GISPDate: November 15, 2011Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet© 2011 Jefferson County GISDisclaimer Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes nowarranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited bythe method and accuracy of its collection. Jefferson County, Washington Shoreline Environmental Designation A q u a t ic P r io r it y A q u a t ic N a tu r a l C o n se r v a nc y Sh o r elin e R e sid en tia l H ig h In t en sity N A M a r ine Sh o r elin e P la n n in g A r e a P r io r it y A q u a t ic Pa r c els Urban Growth Boundary Port Townsend SMP M a p B o u n d a r y E NW NE SESW Clallam County Kitsap CountyMason CountyGrays Harbor County 216 7 111016 1718 1 :3 6 ,7 9 0 Map # 5. Marrowstone 0 0 .5 5 1 .10.2 75 M ile s £¤101 Discovery Bay £¤101 ?@19 ?@104 ?@20 Leland CreekHowe C r e e k Contract ors CreekTarbo o Creek Chimacum C r e e kCity LakeEAGLEMOUNT UNCAS FAIRMONT FOURCORNERSADELMABEACHGARDINER TUKEY HHH III JJJ KKK LLL Final 10/31/2011 This m ap is in tended for p lan nin g p urp oses only. T h e O f fic ia l S h ore line M ap sh o w s th e en v iron m en t d es ig n ation sthat a p p ly to e ac h s eg m e n t of the s ho relin e p la n n in g a rea . It d oesnot n ec es s arily id en tify o r d e p ict th e p re c is e late ral ex te n t ofshoreline ju risd ic tio n or a ll a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e late ra l e x ten t ofthe s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion a t th e p a rce l lev el s ha ll b e d eter m ine d o n a ca se -by -c a se ba sis at th e tim e a s h ore lin e d ev elo p m en t isproposed. T h e a ctu al ex te n t of sh or elin e ju risd ic tio n req u ires asite-sp ec ific ev a lu a tio n to id e n tify th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a n y a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e C o u n ty sh a ll m a in tain a G e og rap h ic In fo rm a tion S y ste m sdatabase th a t d ep ic ts th e c oord in a tes for lo ca tin g th e u p s trea mextent o f s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion (th a t is, th e lo ca tion w h ere th e m ea nannual stre am flow is a t lea st 2 0 c u b ic fee t p e r se c on d ). T h edatabase s h a ll also s ho w th e lim its of th e floo d p lain , flo od w a y , an dchannel m igra tion z on es , a n d s u c h in f orm ation s h all b e u se d , a lo n gwith site-s p ec ific in form a tion on th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a ss oc ia ted w etla n d s , to d ete rm in e th e la tera l ex ten tof s h orelin e ju ris d iction o n a p a rc el-by -p a rc el ba sis. T h e d ata ba s eshall be u p d ate d re gu la rly a s n e w in fo rm a tio n is m ad e a v aila ble a n dthe p u blic sh a ll h a v e a c ce ss to th e d ata ba s e u p on re qu e st. File: Q:\MapDocs\DCD\SMP2011\SED2011_Root.mxdPrepared By: Doug Noltemeier, GISPDate: November 15, 2011Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet© 2011 Jefferson County GISDisclaimer Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes nowarranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited bythe method and accuracy of its collection. Jefferson County, Washington Shoreline Environmental Designation A q u a t ic P r io r it y A q u a t ic N a tu r a l C o n se r v a nc y Sh o r elin e R e sid en tia l H ig h In t en sity N A M a r ine Sh o r elin e P la n n in g A r e a P r io r it y A q u a t ic Pa r c els Urban Growth Boundary Port Townsend SMP M a p B o u n d a r y E NW NE SESW Clallam County Kitsap CountyMason CountyGrays Harbor County 216 7 111016 1718 1 :5 1 ,9 2 0 Map # 6. Discovery Bay 0 0 .7 5 1 .50.3 75 M ile s Oak Bay ?@116 ?@20 ?@104 ?@19 Th o r ndyke Cree kTarboo Creek C hi macu m C r e e kCity LakeBEAVERVALLEY CENTER MATSMATS EAGLEMOUNT CHIMACUM WESTVALLEY SS BB CC EE FF GG HHH HH III II JJJ JJ KK RR TT W YYZZPortHadlock/IrondaleUGA Final 10/31/2011 This m ap is in tended for p lan nin g p urp oses only. T h e O f fic ia l S h ore line M ap sh o w s th e en v iron m en t d es ig n ation sthat a p p ly to e ac h s eg m e n t of the s ho relin e p la n n in g a rea . It d oesnot n ec es s arily id en tify o r d e p ict th e p re c is e late ral ex te n t ofshoreline ju risd ic tio n or a ll a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e late ra l e x ten t ofthe s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion a t th e p a rce l lev el s ha ll b e d eter m ine d o n a ca se -by -c a se ba sis at th e tim e a s h ore lin e d ev elo p m en t isproposed. T h e a ctu al ex te n t of sh or elin e ju risd ic tio n req u ires asite-sp ec ific ev a lu a tio n to id e n tify th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a n y a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e C o u n ty sh a ll m a in tain a G e og rap h ic In fo rm a tion S y ste m sdatabase th a t d ep ic ts th e c oord in a tes for lo ca tin g th e u p s trea mextent o f s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion (th a t is, th e lo ca tion w h ere th e m ea nannual stre am flow is a t lea st 2 0 c u b ic fee t p e r se c on d ). T h edatabase s h a ll also s ho w th e lim its of th e floo d p lain , flo od w a y , an dchannel m igra tion z on es , a n d s u c h in f orm ation s h all b e u se d , a lo n gwith site-s p ec ific in form a tion on th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a ss oc ia ted w etla n d s , to d ete rm in e th e la tera l ex ten tof s h orelin e ju ris d iction o n a p a rc el-by -p a rc el ba sis. T h e d ata ba s eshall be u p d ate d re gu la rly a s n e w in fo rm a tio n is m ad e a v aila ble a n dthe p u blic sh a ll h a v e a c ce ss to th e d ata ba s e u p on re qu e st. File: Q:\MapDocs\DCD\SMP2011\SED2011_Root.mxdPrepared By: Doug Noltemeier, GISPDate: November 15, 2011Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet© 2011 Jefferson County GISDisclaimer Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes nowarranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited bythe method and accuracy of its collection. Jefferson County, Washington Shoreline Environmental Designation A q u a t ic P r io r it y A q u a t ic N a tu r a l C o n se r v a nc y Sh o r elin e R e sid en tia l H ig h In t en sity N A M a r ine Sh o r elin e P la n n in g A r e a P r io r it y A q u a t ic Pa r c els Urban Growth Boundary Port Townsend SMP M a p B o u n d a r y E NW NE SESW Clallam County Kitsap CountyMason CountyGrays Harbor County 216 7 111016 1718 1 :5 3 ,9 9 0 Map # 7. South Chimacum 0 0 .7 5 1 .50.3 75 M ile s Oak Bay ?@19 ?@19 PORTLUDLOW BEAVERVALLEY MATSMATS BB CC DD EE FF GG HH Final 10/31/2011 This m ap is in tended for p lan nin g p urp oses only. T h e O f fic ia l S h ore line M ap sh o w s th e en v iron m en t d es ig n ation sthat a p p ly to e ac h s eg m e n t of the s ho relin e p la n n in g a rea . It d oesnot n ec es s arily id en tify o r d e p ict th e p re c is e late ral ex te n t ofshoreline ju risd ic tio n or a ll a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e late ra l e x ten t ofthe s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion a t th e p a rce l lev el s ha ll b e d eter m ine d o n a ca se -by -c a se ba sis at th e tim e a s h ore lin e d ev elo p m en t isproposed. T h e a ctu al ex te n t of sh or elin e ju risd ic tio n req u ires asite-sp ec ific ev a lu a tio n to id e n tify th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a n y a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e C o u n ty sh a ll m a in tain a G e og rap h ic In fo rm a tion S y ste m sdatabase th a t d ep ic ts th e c oord in a tes for lo ca tin g th e u p s trea mextent o f s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion (th a t is, th e lo ca tion w h ere th e m ea nannual stre am flow is a t lea st 2 0 c u b ic fee t p e r se c on d ). T h edatabase s h a ll also s ho w th e lim its of th e floo d p lain , flo od w a y , an dchannel m igra tion z on es , a n d s u c h in f orm ation s h all b e u se d , a lo n gwith site-s p ec ific in form a tion on th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a ss oc ia ted w etla n d s , to d ete rm in e th e la tera l ex ten tof s h orelin e ju ris d iction o n a p a rc el-by -p a rc el ba sis. T h e d ata ba s eshall be u p d ate d re gu la rly a s n e w in fo rm a tio n is m ad e a v aila ble a n dthe p u blic sh a ll h a v e a c ce ss to th e d ata ba s e u p on re qu e st. File: Q:\MapDocs\DCD\SMP2011\SED2011_Root.mxdPrepared By: Doug Noltemeier, GISPDate: November 15, 2011Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet© 2011 Jefferson County GISDisclaimer Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes nowarranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited bythe method and accuracy of its collection. Jefferson County, Washington Shoreline Environmental Designation A q u a t ic P r io r it y A q u a t ic N a tu r a l C o n se r v a nc y Sh o r elin e R e sid en tia l H ig h In t en sity N A M a r ine Sh o r elin e P la n n in g A r e a P r io r it y A q u a t ic Pa r c els Urban Growth Boundary Port Townsend SMP M a p B o u n d a r y E NW NE SESW Clallam County Kitsap CountyMason CountyGrays Harbor County 216 7 111016 1718 1 :2 3 ,3 4 0 Map # 8. North Port Ludlow 0 0 .3 0 .60.1 5 M ile s PORTLUDLOW MATSMATS BB CC DD Final 10/31/2011 This m ap is in tended for p lan nin g p urp oses only. T h e O f fic ia l S h ore line M ap sh o w s th e en v iron m en t d es ig n ation sthat a p p ly to e ac h s eg m e n t of the s ho relin e p la n n in g a rea . It d oesnot n ec es s arily id en tify o r d e p ict th e p re c is e late ral ex te n t ofshoreline ju risd ic tio n or a ll a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e late ra l e x ten t ofthe s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion a t th e p a rce l lev el s ha ll b e d eter m ine d o n a ca se -by -c a se ba sis at th e tim e a s h ore lin e d ev elo p m en t isproposed. T h e a ctu al ex te n t of sh or elin e ju risd ic tio n req u ires asite-sp ec ific ev a lu a tio n to id e n tify th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a n y a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e C o u n ty sh a ll m a in tain a G e og rap h ic In fo rm a tion S y ste m sdatabase th a t d ep ic ts th e c oord in a tes for lo ca tin g th e u p s trea mextent o f s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion (th a t is, th e lo ca tion w h ere th e m ea nannual stre am flow is a t lea st 2 0 c u b ic fee t p e r se c on d ). T h edatabase s h a ll also s ho w th e lim its of th e floo d p lain , flo od w a y , an dchannel m igra tion z on es , a n d s u c h in f orm ation s h all b e u se d , a lo n gwith site-s p ec ific in form a tion on th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a ss oc ia ted w etla n d s , to d ete rm in e th e la tera l ex ten tof s h orelin e ju ris d iction o n a p a rc el-by -p a rc el ba sis. T h e d ata ba s eshall be u p d ate d re gu la rly a s n e w in fo rm a tio n is m ad e a v aila ble a n dthe p u blic sh a ll h a v e a c ce ss to th e d ata ba s e u p on re qu e st. File: Q:\MapDocs\DCD\SMP2011\SED2011_Root.mxdPrepared By: Doug Noltemeier, GISPDate: November 15, 2011Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet© 2011 Jefferson County GISDisclaimer Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes nowarranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited bythe method and accuracy of its collection. Jefferson County, Washington Shoreline Environmental Designation A q u a t ic P r io r it y A q u a t ic N a tu r a l C o n se r v a nc y Sh o r elin e R e sid en tia l H ig h In t en sity N A M a r ine Sh o r elin e P la n n in g A r e a P r io r it y A q u a t ic Pa r c els Urban Growth Boundary Port Townsend SMP M a p B o u n d a r y E NW NE SESW Clallam County Kitsap CountyMason CountyGrays Harbor County 216 7 111016 1718 1 :1 9 ,5 0 0 Map # 9. Port Ludlow 0 0 .2 5 0 .50.1 25 M ile s £¤101 ?@104 Chi ma c u m Creek Tarboo Creek P e nny Cr e e kHowe Cree kDonovan CreekRiple y C reek Howe C reek Leland Creek LELAND Final 10/31/2011 This m ap is in tended for p lan nin g p urp oses only. T h e O f fic ia l S h ore line M ap sh o w s th e en v iron m en t d es ig n ation sthat a p p ly to e ac h s eg m e n t of the s ho relin e p la n n in g a rea . It d oesnot n ec es s arily id en tify o r d e p ict th e p re c is e late ral ex te n t ofshoreline ju risd ic tio n or a ll a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e late ra l e x ten t ofthe s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion a t th e p a rce l lev el s ha ll b e d eter m ine d o n a ca se -by -c a se ba sis at th e tim e a s h ore lin e d ev elo p m en t isproposed. T h e a ctu al ex te n t of sh or elin e ju risd ic tio n req u ires asite-sp ec ific ev a lu a tio n to id e n tify th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a n y a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e C o u n ty sh a ll m a in tain a G e og rap h ic In fo rm a tion S y ste m sdatabase th a t d ep ic ts th e c oord in a tes for lo ca tin g th e u p s trea mextent o f s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion (th a t is, th e lo ca tion w h ere th e m ea nannual stre am flow is a t lea st 2 0 c u b ic fee t p e r se c on d ). T h edatabase s h a ll also s ho w th e lim its of th e floo d p lain , flo od w a y , an dchannel m igra tion z on es , a n d s u c h in f orm ation s h all b e u se d , a lo n gwith site-s p ec ific in form a tion on th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a ss oc ia ted w etla n d s , to d ete rm in e th e la tera l ex ten tof s h orelin e ju ris d iction o n a p a rc el-by -p a rc el ba sis. T h e d ata ba s eshall be u p d ate d re gu la rly a s n e w in fo rm a tio n is m ad e a v aila ble a n dthe p u blic sh a ll h a v e a c ce ss to th e d ata ba s e u p on re qu e st. File: Q:\MapDocs\DCD\SMP2011\SED2011_Root.mxdPrepared By: Doug Noltemeier, GISPDate: November 15, 2011Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet© 2011 Jefferson County GISDisclaimer Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes nowarranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited bythe method and accuracy of its collection. Jefferson County, Washington Shoreline Environmental Designation A q u a t ic P r io r it y A q u a t ic N a tu r a l C o n se r v a nc y Sh o r elin e R e sid en tia l H ig h In t en sity N A M a r ine Sh o r elin e P la n n in g A r e a P r io r it y A q u a t ic Pa r c els Urban Growth Boundary Port Townsend SMP M a p B o u n d a r y E NW NE SESW Clallam County Kitsap CountyMason CountyGrays Harbor County 216 7 111016 1718 1 :3 7 ,1 4 0 Map # 10. Leland 0 0 .5 5 1 .10.2 75 M ile s Hood Canal Dabob Bay ?@19 ?@104 Leland CreekChimacu m Cr e e k Donovan CreekThorndyke Cre ekTarboo Creek Si l ent LakeDABOB BEAVERVALLEY CENTER CC N O P Q R S V W Final 10/31/2011 This m ap is in tended for p lan nin g p urp oses only. T h e O f fic ia l S h ore line M ap sh o w s th e en v iron m en t d es ig n ation sthat a p p ly to e ac h s eg m e n t of the s ho relin e p la n n in g a rea . It d oesnot n ec es s arily id en tify o r d e p ict th e p re c is e late ral ex te n t ofshoreline ju risd ic tio n or a ll a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e late ra l e x ten t ofthe s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion a t th e p a rce l lev el s ha ll b e d eter m ine d o n a ca se -by -c a se ba sis at th e tim e a s h ore lin e d ev elo p m en t isproposed. T h e a ctu al ex te n t of sh or elin e ju risd ic tio n req u ires asite-sp ec ific ev a lu a tio n to id e n tify th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a n y a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e C o u n ty sh a ll m a in tain a G e og rap h ic In fo rm a tion S y ste m sdatabase th a t d ep ic ts th e c oord in a tes for lo ca tin g th e u p s trea mextent o f s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion (th a t is, th e lo ca tion w h ere th e m ea nannual stre am flow is a t lea st 2 0 c u b ic fee t p e r se c on d ). T h edatabase s h a ll also s ho w th e lim its of th e floo d p lain , flo od w a y , an dchannel m igra tion z on es , a n d s u c h in f orm ation s h all b e u se d , a lo n gwith site-s p ec ific in form a tion on th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a ss oc ia ted w etla n d s , to d ete rm in e th e la tera l ex ten tof s h orelin e ju ris d iction o n a p a rc el-by -p a rc el ba sis. T h e d ata ba s eshall be u p d ate d re gu la rly a s n e w in fo rm a tio n is m ad e a v aila ble a n dthe p u blic sh a ll h a v e a c ce ss to th e d ata ba s e u p on re qu e st. File: Q:\MapDocs\DCD\SMP2011\SED2011_Root.mxdPrepared By: Doug Noltemeier, GISPDate: November 15, 2011Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet© 2011 Jefferson County GISDisclaimer Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes nowarranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited bythe method and accuracy of its collection. Jefferson County, Washington Shoreline Environmental Designation A q u a t ic P r io r it y A q u a t ic N a tu r a l C o n se r v a nc y Sh o r elin e R e sid en tia l H ig h In t en sity N A M a r ine Sh o r elin e P la n n in g A r e a P r io r it y A q u a t ic Pa r c els Urban Growth Boundary Port Townsend SMP M a p B o u n d a r y E NW NE SESW Clallam County Kitsap CountyMason CountyGrays Harbor County 216 7 111016 1718 1 :5 4 ,3 7 0 Map # 11. North Toandos Peninsula 0 0 .8 1 .60.4 M ile s Hood Canal Squamish Harbor ?@19 ?@104 Twin Lakes Mud LakePhe asant LakeLost Lake PORTLUDLOW BEAVERVALLEY AA BB CC DD V W X Final 10/31/2011 This m ap is in tended for p lan nin g p urp oses only. T h e O f fic ia l S h ore line M ap sh o w s th e en v iron m en t d es ig n ation sthat a p p ly to e ac h s eg m e n t of the s ho relin e p la n n in g a rea . It d oesnot n ec es s arily id en tify o r d e p ict th e p re c is e late ral ex te n t ofshoreline ju risd ic tio n or a ll a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e late ra l e x ten t ofthe s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion a t th e p a rce l lev el s ha ll b e d eter m ine d o n a ca se -by -c a se ba sis at th e tim e a s h ore lin e d ev elo p m en t isproposed. T h e a ctu al ex te n t of sh or elin e ju risd ic tio n req u ires asite-sp ec ific ev a lu a tio n to id e n tify th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a n y a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e C o u n ty sh a ll m a in tain a G e og rap h ic In fo rm a tion S y ste m sdatabase th a t d ep ic ts th e c oord in a tes for lo ca tin g th e u p s trea mextent o f s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion (th a t is, th e lo ca tion w h ere th e m ea nannual stre am flow is a t lea st 2 0 c u b ic fee t p e r se c on d ). T h edatabase s h a ll also s ho w th e lim its of th e floo d p lain , flo od w a y , an dchannel m igra tion z on es , a n d s u c h in f orm ation s h all b e u se d , a lo n gwith site-s p ec ific in form a tion on th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a ss oc ia ted w etla n d s , to d ete rm in e th e la tera l ex ten tof s h orelin e ju ris d iction o n a p a rc el-by -p a rc el ba sis. T h e d ata ba s eshall be u p d ate d re gu la rly a s n e w in fo rm a tio n is m ad e a v aila ble a n dthe p u blic sh a ll h a v e a c ce ss to th e d ata ba s e u p on re qu e st. File: Q:\MapDocs\DC D\SMP2011\SED2011_Root.mxdPrepared By: Doug Noltemeier, GISPDate: November 15, 2011Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet© 2011 Jefferson County GISDisclaimer Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes nowarranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited bythe method and accuracy of its collection. Jefferson County, Washington Shoreline Environmental Designation A q u a t ic P r io r it y A q u a t ic N a tu r a l C o n se r v a nc y Sh o r elin e R e sid en tia l H ig h In t en sity N A M a r ine Sh o r elin e P la n n in g A r e a P r io r it y A q u a t ic Pa r c els Urban Growth Boundary Port Townsend SMP M a p B o u n d a r y E NW NE SESW Clallam County Kitsap CountyMason CountyGrays Harbor County 216 7 111016 1718 1 :3 3 ,7 4 0 Map # 12. Shine 0 0 .4 5 0 .90.2 25 M ile s Hood Canal ?@104 AA BBDD W X Y Z Final 10/31/2011 This m ap is in tended for p lan nin g p urp oses only. T h e O f fic ia l S h ore line M ap sh o w s th e en v iron m en t d es ig n ation sthat a p p ly to e ac h s eg m e n t of the s ho relin e p la n n in g a rea . It d oesnot n ec es s arily id en tify o r d e p ict th e p re c is e late ral ex te n t ofshoreline ju risd ic tio n or a ll a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e late ra l e x ten t ofthe s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion a t th e p a rce l lev el s ha ll b e d eter m ine d o n a ca se -by -c a se ba sis at th e tim e a s h ore lin e d ev elo p m en t isproposed. T h e a ctu al ex te n t of sh or elin e ju risd ic tio n req u ires asite-sp ec ific ev a lu a tio n to id e n tify th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a n y a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e C o u n ty sh a ll m a in tain a G e og rap h ic In fo rm a tion S y ste m sdatabase th a t d ep ic ts th e c oord in a tes for lo ca tin g th e u p s trea mextent o f s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion (th a t is, th e lo ca tion w h ere th e m ea nannual stre am flow is a t lea st 2 0 c u b ic fee t p e r se c on d ). T h edatabase s h a ll also s ho w th e lim its of th e floo d p lain , flo od w a y , an dchannel m igra tion z on es , a n d s u c h in f orm ation s h all b e u se d , a lo n gwith site-s p ec ific in form a tion on th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a ss oc ia ted w etla n d s , to d ete rm in e th e la tera l ex ten tof s h orelin e ju ris d iction o n a p a rc el-by -p a rc el ba sis. T h e d ata ba s eshall be u p d ate d re gu la rly a s n e w in fo rm a tio n is m ad e a v aila ble a n dthe p u blic sh a ll h a v e a c ce ss to th e d ata ba s e u p on re qu e st. File: Q:\MapDocs\DCD\SMP2011\SED2011_Root.mxdPrepared By: Doug Noltemeier, GISPDate: November 15, 2011Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet© 2011 Jefferson County GISDisclaimer Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes nowarranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited bythe method and accuracy of its collection. Jefferson County, Washington Shoreline Environmental Designation A q u a t ic P r io r it y A q u a t ic N a tu r a l C o n se r v a nc y Sh o r elin e R e sid en tia l H ig h In t en sity N A M a r ine Sh o r elin e P la n n in g A r e a P r io r it y A q u a t ic Pa r c els Urban Growth Boundary Port Townsend SMP M a p B o u n d a r y E NW NE SESW Clallam County Kitsap CountyMason CountyGrays Harbor County 216 7 111016 1718 1 :2 4 ,7 7 0 Map # 13. Paradise Bay 0 0 .3 5 0 .70.1 75 M ile s Hood Canal ?@104 Twin Lakes Mud LakePheasant Lake Lost Lake V W Final 10/31/2011 This m ap is in tended for p lan nin g p urp oses only. T h e O f fic ia l S h ore line M ap sh o w s th e en v iron m en t d es ig n ation sthat a p p ly to e ac h s eg m e n t of the s ho relin e p la n n in g a rea . It d oesnot n ec es s arily id en tify o r d e p ict th e p re c is e late ral ex te n t ofshoreline ju risd ic tio n or a ll a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e late ra l e x ten t ofthe s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion a t th e p a rce l lev el s ha ll b e d eter m ine d o n a ca se -by -c a se ba sis at th e tim e a s h ore lin e d ev elo p m en t isproposed. T h e a ctu al ex te n t of sh or elin e ju risd ic tio n req u ires asite-sp ec ific ev a lu a tio n to id e n tify th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a n y a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e C o u n ty sh a ll m a in tain a G e og rap h ic In fo rm a tion S y ste m sdatabase th a t d ep ic ts th e c oord in a tes for lo ca tin g th e u p s trea mextent o f s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion (th a t is, th e lo ca tion w h ere th e m ea nannual stre am flow is a t lea st 2 0 c u b ic fee t p e r se c on d ). T h edatabase s h a ll also s ho w th e lim its of th e floo d p lain , flo od w a y , an dchannel m igra tion z on es , a n d s u c h in f orm ation s h all b e u se d , a lo n gwith site-s p ec ific in form a tion on th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a ss oc ia ted w etla n d s , to d ete rm in e th e la tera l ex ten tof s h orelin e ju ris d iction o n a p a rc el-by -p a rc el ba sis. T h e d ata ba s eshall be u p d ate d re gu la rly a s n e w in fo rm a tio n is m ad e a v aila ble a n dthe p u blic sh a ll h a v e a c ce ss to th e d ata ba s e u p on re qu e st. File: Q:\M apDocs\DC D\SM P2011\SED2011_Root.mxdPrepared By: Doug Noltemeier, GISPDate: November 15, 2011Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet© 2011 Jefferson County GISDisclaimer Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes nowarranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited bythe method and accuracy of its collection. Jefferson County, Washington Shoreline Environmental Designation A q u a t ic P r io r it y A q u a t ic N a tu r a l C o n se r v a nc y Sh o r elin e R e sid en tia l H ig h In t en sity N A M a r ine Sh o r elin e P la n n in g A r e a P r io r it y A q u a t ic Pa r c els Urban Growth Boundary Port Townsend SMP M a p B o u n d a r y E NW NE SESW Clallam County Kitsap CountyMason CountyGrays Harbor County 216 7 111016 1718 1 :2 1 ,9 0 0 Map # 14. Thorndyke 0 0 .3 0 .60.1 5 M ile s Hood Canal Dabob Bay Si l ent LakeCOYLE L M P Q S T U V Final 10/31/2011 This m ap is in tended for p lan nin g p urp oses only. T h e O f fic ia l S h ore line M ap sh o w s th e en v iron m en t d es ig n ation sthat a p p ly to e ac h s eg m e n t of the s ho relin e p la n n in g a rea . It d oesnot n ec es s arily id en tify o r d e p ict th e p re c is e late ral ex te n t ofshoreline ju risd ic tio n or a ll a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e late ra l e x ten t ofthe s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion a t th e p a rce l lev el s ha ll b e d eter m ine d o n a ca se -by -c a se ba sis at th e tim e a s h ore lin e d ev elo p m en t isproposed. T h e a ctu al ex te n t of sh or elin e ju risd ic tio n req u ires asite-sp ec ific ev a lu a tio n to id e n tify th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a n y a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e C o u n ty sh a ll m a in tain a G e og rap h ic In fo rm a tion S y ste m sdatabase th a t d ep ic ts th e c oord in a tes for lo ca tin g th e u p s trea mextent o f s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion (th a t is, th e lo ca tion w h ere th e m ea nannual stre am flow is a t lea st 2 0 c u b ic fee t p e r se c on d ). T h edatabase s h a ll also s ho w th e lim its of th e floo d p lain , flo od w a y , an dchannel m igra tion z on es , a n d s u c h in f orm ation s h all b e u se d , a lo n gwith site-s p ec ific in form a tion on th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a ss oc ia ted w etla n d s , to d ete rm in e th e la tera l ex ten tof s h orelin e ju ris d iction o n a p a rc el-by -p a rc el ba sis. T h e d ata ba s eshall be u p d ate d re gu la rly a s n e w in fo rm a tio n is m ad e a v aila ble a n dthe p u blic sh a ll h a v e a c ce ss to th e d ata ba s e u p on re qu e st. File: Q:\MapDocs\DCD\SMP2011\SED2011_Root.mxdPrepared By: Doug Noltemeier, GISPDate: November 15, 2011Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet© 2011 Jefferson County GISDisclaimer Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes nowarranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited bythe method and accuracy of its collection. Jefferson County, Washington Shoreline Environmental Designation A q u a t ic P r io r it y A q u a t ic N a tu r a l C o n se r v a nc y Sh o r elin e R e sid en tia l H ig h In t en sity N A M a r ine Sh o r elin e P la n n in g A r e a P r io r it y A q u a t ic Pa r c els Urban Growth Boundary Port Townsend SMP M a p B o u n d a r y E NW NE SESW Clallam County Kitsap CountyMason CountyGrays Harbor County 216 7 111016 1718 1 :4 3 ,9 6 0 Map # 15. South Toandos Peninsula (Coyle) 0 0 .6 1 .20.3 M ile s Dabob Bay £¤101 OO ll yy mm pp ii cc NN aa tt ii oo nn aa ll FF oo rr ee ss tt Elbo CreekIndian Georg e Cre ekMile And A Half CreekSpencer Creek Howe C reek H o we Creek Ripley Creek Donovan CreekTa rboo Cr e ekPenny Creek Bi g Q uilcene RiverLeland CreekQUILCENE LELAND LM N O P Q R S Final 10/31/2011 This m ap is in tended for p lan nin g p urp oses only. T h e O f fic ia l S h ore line M ap sh o w s th e en v iron m en t d es ig n ation sthat a p p ly to e ac h s eg m e n t of the s ho relin e p la n n in g a rea . It d oesnot n ec es s arily id en tify o r d e p ict th e p re c is e late ral ex te n t ofshoreline ju risd ic tio n or a ll a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e late ra l e x ten t ofthe s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion a t th e p a rce l lev el s ha ll b e d eter m ine d o n a ca se -by -c a se ba sis at th e tim e a s h ore lin e d ev elo p m en t isproposed. T h e a ctu al ex te n t of sh or elin e ju risd ic tio n req u ires asite-sp ec ific ev a lu a tio n to id e n tify th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a n y a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e C o u n ty sh a ll m a in tain a G e og rap h ic In fo rm a tion S y ste m sdatabase th a t d ep ic ts th e c oord in a tes for lo ca tin g th e u p s trea mextent o f s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion (th a t is, th e lo ca tion w h ere th e m ea nannual stre am flow is a t lea st 2 0 c u b ic fee t p e r se c on d ). T h edatabase s h a ll also s ho w th e lim its of th e floo d p lain , flo od w a y , an dchannel m igra tion z on es , a n d s u c h in f orm ation s h all b e u se d , a lo n gwith site-s p ec ific in form a tion on th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a ss oc ia ted w etla n d s , to d ete rm in e th e la tera l ex ten tof s h orelin e ju ris d iction o n a p a rc el-by -p a rc el ba sis. T h e d ata ba s eshall be u p d ate d re gu la rly a s n e w in fo rm a tio n is m ad e a v aila ble a n dthe p u blic sh a ll h a v e a c ce ss to th e d ata ba s e u p on re qu e st. File: Q:\MapDocs\DCD\SMP2011\SED2011_Root.mxdPrepared By: Doug Noltemeier, GISPDate: November 15, 2011Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet© 2011 Jefferson County GISDisclaimer Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes nowarranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited bythe method and accuracy of its collection. Jefferson County, Washington Shoreline Environmental Designation A q u a t ic P r io r it y A q u a t ic N a tu r a l C o n se r v a nc y Sh o r elin e R e sid en tia l H ig h In t en sity N A M a r ine Sh o r elin e P la n n in g A r e a P r io r it y A q u a t ic Pa r c els Urban Growth Boundary Port Townsend SMP M a p B o u n d a r y E NW NE SESW Clallam County Kitsap CountyMason CountyGrays Harbor County 216 7 111016 1718 1 :4 8 ,7 3 0 Map # 16. Quilcene 0 0 .7 1 .40.3 5 M ile s £¤101 Hood Canal Dabob Bay Seabeck Bay Stavis Bay£¤101OOllyymmppiicc NN aa tt ii oo nn aa ll FF oo rr ee ss tt Kitsap CountyMason CountyDosewallips State Park Turner CreekWilson CreekThreem ile CreekJa c k son CreekDeserter CreekSpencer C r eekMile And A Half CreekElbo CreekSouth For k Fulton Creek Wal kers CreekMc Donald Creek Tunn e l C reek Marple Creek F u l t o n Cre ekDuckabu sh River R o c k y Brook Bi g Quilcene Rive r D osewallips River DUCKABUSH SEALROCK A B C D E F GH I J K L M N P Q S T Final 10/31/2011 This m ap is in tended for p lan nin g p urp oses only. T h e O f fic ia l S h ore line M ap sh o w s th e en v iron m en t d es ig n ation sthat a p p ly to e ac h s eg m e n t of the s ho relin e p la n n in g a rea . It d oesnot n ec es s arily id en tify o r d e p ict th e p re c is e late ral ex te n t ofshoreline ju risd ic tio n or a ll a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e late ra l e x ten t ofthe s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion a t th e p a rce l lev el s ha ll b e d eter m ine d o n a ca se -by -c a se ba sis at th e tim e a s h ore lin e d ev elo p m en t isproposed. T h e a ctu al ex te n t of sh or elin e ju risd ic tio n req u ires asite-sp ec ific ev a lu a tio n to id e n tify th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a n y a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e C o u n ty sh a ll m a in tain a G e og rap h ic In fo rm a tion S y ste m sdatabase th a t d ep ic ts th e c oord in a tes for lo ca tin g th e u p s trea mextent o f s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion (th a t is, th e lo ca tion w h ere th e m ea nannual stre am flow is a t lea st 2 0 c u b ic fee t p e r se c on d ). T h edatabase s h a ll also s ho w th e lim its of th e floo d p lain , flo od w a y , an dchannel m igra tion z on es , a n d s u c h in f orm ation s h all b e u se d , a lo n gwith site-s p ec ific in form a tion on th e loc a tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a ss oc ia ted w etla n d s , to d ete rm in e th e la tera l ex ten tof s h orelin e ju ris d iction o n a p a rc el-by -p a rc el ba sis. T h e d ata ba s eshall be u p d ate d re gu la rly a s n e w in fo rm a tio n is m ad e a v aila ble a n dthe p u blic sh a ll h a v e a c ce ss to th e d ata ba s e u p on re qu e st. File: Q:\MapDocs\DCD\SMP2011\SED2011_Root.mxdPrepared By: Doug Noltemeier, GISPDate: November 15, 2011Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet© 2011 Jefferson County GISDisclaimer Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes nowarranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited bythe method and accuracy of its collection. Jefferson County, Washington Shoreline Environmental Designation A q u a t ic P r io r it y A q u a t ic N a tu r a l C o n se r v a nc y Sh o r elin e R e sid en tia l H ig h In t en sity N A M a r ine Sh o r elin e P la n n in g A r e a P r io r it y A q u a t ic Pa r c els Urban Growth Boundary Port Townsend SMP M a p B o u n d a r y E NW NE SESW Clallam County Kitsap CountyMason CountyGrays Harbor County 216 7 111016 1718 1 :6 7 ,8 4 0 Map # 17. Brinnon 0 1 20.5 M ile s ?@110 £¤101 £¤101 P a cifi c O c e a n £¤101 CC oo ll oo nn ee ll BB oo bb NN WW AA OO ll yy mm pp ii cc NN aa tt ii oo nn aa ll FF oo rr ee ss tt OO ll yy mm pp ii cc NN aa tt ii oo nn aa ll PP aa rr kkCultis CreekOw l C r e e k Christmas CreekSand Creek Maple Creek Itsw o o t CreekCanyon CreekCedar Cree k South F ork H oh River Dry Creek P eterson CreekTacoma CreekKunamakst Cre e kFossil CreekMount To m Creek Ea st F or k Miller Cre ek M iller Cre ekPrairie C reekDowans Cree kFalls Cree kWilloughby Creek Lindner CreekShale C r e e k Braden Creek Elk Creek Anderson CreekKerr CreekWinfield C r eek G o odman C r e ek Deception C r eekSnell CreekTaft Creek Lake Creek S nider Creek S late CreekDi s mal Cr e ekTower CreekMink Creek Olallie CreekH u nt Creek Pelton CreekParadise CreekCoal CreekHee Hee Cre ekHibbard CreekFox CreekJackson CreekSp r u c e C reekClear Creek Mud Creek Twi n Creek Hades Cree kBob CreekBull Cre e k Big C ree k McKinnon CreekH o ok Branch Creek Pins Creek J a c k s o n CreekSteamb o a t Cre ek L ost C r e ekSouth Fork M a n or Creek A l t a CreekNort h F ork M osquito Cree k East Fork Kalaloch CreekBi g Cree k Glacier CreekA lder Cree kElk Cre e k Minter Cre e k Boulder C reekH a rlo w Creek H u rs t Creek Steq u a leho C reek Nolan Creek Mosquito Creek Kalaloch CreekSolleks R i v e r Tshletshy CreekSnahapish RiverSams River Ma th e ny Creek C l ear water R i v e r Lake Quinault Final 10/31/2011 This m ap is in tended for p lan nin g p urp oses only. T h e O f fic ia l S h ore lin e M ap sh o w s th e en v iro nm en t d es ig n ation sthat a p p ly to e ac h s eg m e n t of the s h orelin e p la n n in g a rea . It d oe snot n ec e ss arily id en tify o r d e p ict th e p re c is e late ral ex te n t ofshoreline ju risd ic tio n or a ll a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e la tera l e x ten t ofthe s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion a t th e p a rce l lev el s h all b e d ete rm in ed on a ca se -by -c a se ba sis at th e tim e a s h ore lin e d ev elo p m en t isproposed. T h e a c tu al ex te n t of sh or elin e ju risd ic tio n req u ires asite-sp ec ific ev a lu a tion to id en tify th e lo ca tio n of th e o rd in ary h ig hwater m a rk an d a n y a ss oc iate d w etla nd s. T h e C o u n ty sh a ll m a in tain a G e og ra p h ic In fo rm a tion S y ste m sdatabase th a t d ep ic ts th e c oord in a tes fo r lo ca tin g th e u p s trea mextent o f s ho relin e ju ris d ic tion (th a t is, th e lo ca tion w h ere th e m ea nannual stre am flow is a t lea st 2 0 c u b ic fe et p e r se c on d ). T h edatabase s h a ll also s ho w th e lim its of th e floo d p lain , flo od w a y , an dchannel m igra tion z on e s, a n d s u c h in f orm ation s h all be u se d , a lo n gwith site-s p ec ific in form a tion on th e lo ca tio n of th e o rd ina ry h ig hwater m a rk an d a ss oc ia ted w etlan d s , to d ete rm in e th e la tera l ex ten tof s h orelin e ju ris d iction o n a p a rc el-by -p a rc el ba sis. T h e d ata ba s eshall be u p d ate d re gu la rly a s n e w in fo rm a tio n is m ad e a v aila ble an dthe p u blic sh a ll h a v e a c ce ss to th e d ata ba s e u p on re qu e st. File: Q:\MapDocs\DCD\SMP2011\SED2011_West.mxdPrepared By: Doug Noltemeier, GISPDate: November 17, 2011Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Washington North FIPS 4601 Feet© 2011 Jefferson County GISDisclaimer Jefferson County does not attest to the accuracy of the data contained herein and makes nowarranty with respect to its correctness or validity.Data contained in this map is limited bythe method and accuracy of its collection. Jefferson County, Washington Conservancy E NW NE SESW Clallam County Kitsap County Mason CountyGrays Harbor County CANADA Map # 18. West End 0 1 2 30.5 M iles Where SMP jurisdiction applies:Th e sh orelin e en v iron m en t d esign a tion in ocea n c oastal area s wa terw ard o f th e O H W M ex ten d in g to th e w estern m ost b ou n d ary of th e S tate o f W a sh in g to n sh al l be Prio rity A q u atic. JeffersonCountyCodeChapter18.2218.22.265Habitatmanagementplans-Whenrequired.18.22.270Protectionstandards.18.22.280Conditions.CRITICALAREASSections:ArticleVII.WetlandsArticleI.Purpose18.22.290Stewardshipalternative.18.22.300Classification/designation.18.22.310Regulatedactivities.18.22.330Protectionstandards.18.22.340Noncompensatoryenhancement.18.22.350Mitigation.18.22.010Purpose-Generally.ArticleII.AdministrativeProvisions18.22.020Applicability.18.22.030Identificationandmappingofcriticalareas.18.22.050Coverage.18.22.070Generalexemptions.18.22.080Nonconforminguses.18.22.090Reasonableeconomicusevariance.18.22.095Physicalseparation-Functionalisolation.ArticleVIII.SpecialReports18.22.360Generalrequirements.18.22.370Waivers.18.22.380Retainingconsultants.18.22.390Acceptanceofspecialreports.18.22.400Aquiferrechargeareareport.18.22.410Drainageanderosioncontrolplan.18.22.420Geotechnicalreport.18.22.430Gradingplan.18.22.440Habitatmanagementplan.18.22.450Wetlanddelineationreport.ArticleIII.CriticalAquiferRechargeAreas18.22.100Classification.18.22.110Designation.18.22.120Applicability.18.22.130Protectionstandards.18.22.135Adaptivemanagement.ArticleIX.AlternativeProtectionStandards-CriticalAreaStewardshipPlans(CASPs)18.22.460Criticalareastewardshipplans(CASPs)-Generally.18.22.461Applicabilityandlimitations.18.22.465Performancestandards.18.22.470CASPcontents-Existingconditions.18.22.480Descriptionofthemanagementproposal.18.22.490Maintenance.18.22.510As-builtplanrequirement.18.22.520Periodicmonitoring.18.22.530Contingencyplanning.18.22.540Failuretosubmitrequiredreports.18.22.550Waiver.ArticleIV.FrequentlyFloodedAreas18.22.140Incorporationbyreference.18.22.150Relationshiptootherregulations.ArticleV.GeologicallyHazardousAreas18.22.160Classification/designation.18.22.170Protectionstandards.18.22.180Conditions.ArticleVI.FishandWildlifeHabitatConservationAreas(FWHCAs)ArticleX.ImplementationStrategies18.22.195Compliancealternatives.18.22.200Classification/designation.18.22.210Processandrequirementsfordesignatinghabitatsoflocalimportanceascriticalareas.18.22.220Sourcesusedforidentification.18.22.230Fishandwildlifehabitatconservationarea(FWHCA)maps.18.22.250Regulatedactivities.18.22.570Conservationfutures.18.22.580Education.18.22.590Bestmanagementpractices(BMPs).18.22.600Costsharingincentives.18.22.610Staticbufferwidthsforvoluntarilyenhancedcriticalareas.18.22.620Publicbenefitratingsystem.18-114.33(Revised4/08) 18.22.010eralguidetoalerttheviewertothepossibleloca-tionandextentofcriticalareas.Thesemapsneednottoberelieduponexclusivelytoestablishtheexistence/absenceorboundariesofacriticalarea,ortoestablishwhetheralloftheelementsneces-sarytoidentifyanareaasacriticalareaactuallyexist.Conditionsinthefieldcontrol;intheeventofaconflictbetweentheinformationshownonthemapsandinformationshownasaresultoffieldinvestigations,thelattershallprevail.Totheextentpracticable,thecountyshallensurethatitscriticalareamapsareupdatedasinventoriesarecompletedincompliancewiththerequirementsoftheGrowthManagementAct.[Ord.3-08§1]18.22.630Residentialbestmanagementpractices(BMPs).ArticleXI.WatershedMonitoring18.22.640Watershedmonitoring.ArticleXII.AdaptiveManagement18.22.650Adaptivemanagement.ArticleI.Purpose18.22.010Purpose-Generally.ThepurposeoftheJeffersonCountycriticalareasordinanceistocomplywithstatelawandtodescribeauthorizedmethodsandproceduresestab-lishedtoensurethefunctionsandvaluesofcriticalareasarenotdegradedwhenallowingapprovedusesanddevelopmentactivitiesinthecounty.Thisregulationofferslandownersachoiceoftwometh-odsforensuringthefunctionsandvaluesofcriticalareasarenotdegraded:(1)Foranycriticalarea,landownersmayuseaprescriptivemethod,asdescribedherein;or(2)Forfishandwildlifehabitatconservationareas(FWHCA)andwetlands,landownersmaychooseanadaptivemethodbyprovidingasite-spe-cificstewardshipplan(seeArticleIX,JCC18.22.460).[Ord.3-08§1]ArticleII.AdministrativeProvisions18.22.050Coverage.(1)Thefollowingpermitsandapprovalsshallbesubjectto,andcoordinatedwith,therequire-mentsofthissection:clearingandgrading;siteplanapproval;sewagedisposal;subdivisionorshortsubdivision;bindingsiteplans;buildingper-mit;plannedresidentialdevelopment;shorelinesubstantialdevelopment;variance;conditionalusepermit;certainforestpracticepermits(ClassIVgeneral,ClassIIIconversionoptionharvestplans);otherpermitsleadingtothedevelopmentoralter-ationofland;andrezonesifnotcombinedwithanotherdevelopmentpermit.Ininstanceswhereaproposalinvolvesaparcelofrealpropertywithmorethanonecriticalareaorcriticalareabuffer,thestandardsthatpertaintoeachidentifiedcriticalareashallapply.Whenprovisionsofthissectionconflictwithoneanother,orwhenprovisionsofthissectionconflictwithanyotherlocallaw,theprovisionthatprovidesmoreprotectiontothecrit-icalareashallapply.Nopermitinvolvingadesig-natedcriticalareashallbeapprovedunlessitisdeterminedtobeincompliancewiththiscode.(2)Anyactiontakeninacriticalareadesig-natedunderthischapterthatisinviolationofthestandardsandconditionscontainedhereinisexpresslyprohibited.[Ord.3-08§1]18.22.020Applicability.UnlessotherwiseexemptedunderJCC18.22.070,anylanduseordevelopmentactivitythatissubjecttoadevelopmentpermitorapprovalunderthistitlemayonlybeundertakenonlandlocatedwithinorcontainingacriticalareaoritsbufferiftheprovisionsofthischapteraremet.UnlessotherwiseexemptedunderJCC18.22.070,usesandactivitiesincriticalareasortheirbuffersforwhichnopermitorapprovalisrequiredbyanyotherprovisionofcountycodearealsosubjecttothedevelopmentstandardsandotherrequirementsofthischapter.[Ord.3-08§1]18.22.030Identificationandmappingofcriticalareas.Theapproximatelocationsandextentsofcriti-calareaswithinthecountyaredisplayedonvari-ousinventorymapsavailablethroughtheJeffersonCountydepartmentofcommunitydevelopmentThecriticalareasmapsareprovidedonlyasagen-18.22.070Generalexemptions.Thefollowingactivitiesincriticalareasortheirbuffersareexemptfromtherequirementsofthischapter:(1)AgriculturalactivitieswhenundertakenpursuanttobestmanagementpracticestominimizeimpactstocriticalareasandconsistentwithJCC18.20.030.(2)ForestpracticesregulatedandconductedinaccordancewiththeprovisionsofChapter76.09RCWandforestpracticeregulations,WACTitlei18-114.34(Revised4/08) JeffersonCountyCode18.22.070222,andwhichareexemptfromJeffersonCountyjurisdiction.(3)Maintenanceorreconstructionofexistingpublicorprivateroads,paths,bicycleways,trails,bridges,andassociatedstormdrainagefacilitieswhenundertakenpursuanttobestmanagementpracticestominimizeimpactstocriticalareasandtoimmediatelyrestoreanydisturbedcriticalareaoritsbuffer;provided,thatreconstructiondoesnotinvolveexpansionoffacilities.(4)Maintenanceandrepairofexistingdrainagefacilitiesorsystems,including,butnotlimitedto,ditches,culverts,catchbasins,andoutfallswhenundertakenpursuanttobestmanagementpracticestominimizeimpactstocriticalareasandimmedi-atelytorestoreanydisturbedcriticalareaoritsbuffer.(5)Utilityactivities,whenundertakenpursuanttobestmanagementpracticestominimizeimpactstocriticalareasandimmediatelytorestoreanydis-turbedcriticalareaoritsbuffer:(a)Normalandroutinemaintenanceorrepairofexistingutilityfacilitiesorrights-of-way.(b)Installation,construction,relocationandreplacement,operation,repair,oralterationofallutilitylines,equipment,orappurtenances,notincludingsubstations,inimprovedroadrights-of-(9)Artificialwetlandsandartificialponds.(10)Floodcontrol.Operation,maintenanceandrepairofdikes,ditches,reservoirs,andotherstruc-turesandfacilitieswhichwerecreatedordevel-opedaspartofnormalfloodcontrolactivities,exceptthatthisexemptiondoesnotextendtothepermanentdrainingorpermanentalterationofanyregulatedwetland.(11)Irrigation.Operation,maintenanceandrepairofditches,reservoirs,pondsandotherstruc-turesandfacilities.(12)Recreationaluses,swimming,boatingandfishing.Maintenanceandrepairofdocks,piers,boatlaunchesandfloatsinlakes(providedthattheproposedactioncomplieswiththerequirementsoftheShorelineManagementAct),indeepwaterhabitatsoneacreorgreaterinsizewhensuchactiv-itiesareforrecreationalpurposesanddonotinvolvealterationoforconstructionthrough,overorinaregulatedwetland.Otheroutdooractivities,includinghuntingandfishing(pursuanttostatelaw),birdwatching,hiking,bicycling.(13)Existingresidentiallandscaping.Planting,irrigating,fertilizing,spraying,mowingandprun-ingandmaintenanceandrepairofstructureswhensuchactivitiesarepartofexistingnormalresiden-tiallandscapingactivitiesandnobuildingpermitisrequired.Thisexemptiondoesnotallowfurtherintrusionintoawetland,fishandwildlifehabitatconservationarea,geologicallyhazardousareaortheirbuffers.(14)Allwetlandswhereinwetlandconditionsarebeingmaintainedonlybecauseofhuman-inducedwater,evenifitcanbedeterminedthatthewetlandconditionswouldnolongerexistiftheactivity(forexample,irrigationorpumpingwater)weretobeterminated.(15)RemovalordestructionofnoxiousweedslistedinChapter16-750WACistheresponsibilityofthelandowner;provided,thatthefollowingditionsaremet:(a)TheremovalorcontrolofnoxiousweedsshallfollowguidelinesissuedbytheJeffersonCountynoxiousweedcontrolboard.TheJeffersonCountynoxiousweedcontrolboardshallcoordi-natewiththedepartmentofplanningandcommu-nitydevelopmentforthecontrolofnoxiousweedsinwetlands.way.(6)Reconstruction,remodeling,ormainte-nanceofexistingstructures.Thisexemptionshallnotapplytoreconstructionwhichisproposedasaresultofstructuraldamageassociatedwithageo-logicallyhazardousareaanddoesnotallowfurtherintrusionintoawetland,fishandwildlifehabitatconservationareaand/ortheirbuffers.(7)Siteinvestigativework.Siteinvestigativeworknecessaryforlanduseapplicationsubmittals,includingbutnotlimitedtosurveys,soillogs,andpercolationtestsinvolvingnofilloruseofheavyequipmentinawetland,orafishandwildlifehab-itatconservationareaortheirbuffers;provided,thatdisturbedcriticalareasandtheirbuffersareimmediatelyrestoredandbestmanagementprac-ticesareimplementedandexcavationforsoillogsorpercolationtestsarefilled.(8)Emergencyaction.Actionthatistakenwhichisnecessarytoresolveorpreventimminentthreatordangertopublichealthorsafety,ortopublicorprivateproperty,orseriousenvironmen-taldegradation.Ifthenatureoftheemergencyissuchthatitisnotpossibletofirstseekreview,thedepartment,aswellasanyfederalorstateagencieswithjurisdiction(e.g,,theU.S.ArmyCorpsofEngineers),mustbenotifiedoftheactionwithin30daysoftheinitiationoftheemergencywork.con-(b)AllherbicideapplicationsinaquaticenvironmentsshallconformtotherulesoftheDepartmentofEcology,DepartmentofAgricul-tureandDepartmentofNaturalResources,pursu-anttoChapters173-201,16-228,and222-38WAC.18-114.35(Revised4/08) 18.22.080(16)Theharvestingofwildcropsinamannerthatisnotinjurioustonaturalreproductionofsuchcropsandprovidedtheharvestingdoesnotrequiretillingsoil,plantingcrops,orchangingexistingtopography,waterconditions,orwatersourcesandprovidedtheseactivitiesdonothaveanyadverseimpactsonprotectionofthecriticalareaoritsbuffer.(17)Theenhancementofabufferbyplantingindigenousvegetation.(18)Theconstructionofunpavedtrailswhenlocatedinthebufferareasandelevatedwhenlocatedinwetlands,whicharenotintendedformotorizeduse,andwhicharenowiderthanfivefeet,unlessadditionalwidthisnecessaryforsafetyalongaprecipice,steephillside,orotherhazardousarea.property,theapplicant,upondenialofapermitduetotherequirementsofthischapter,mayapplyforareasonableeconomicusevariance.(2)StaffRecommendationandBurdenofProof.Uponapplicationtothedepartment,thedepartmentshallpreparearecommendationtothehearingexaminer.Thepropertyownerand/orapplicantforareasonableeconomicusevarianceshallbeartheburdenofprovingthatthepropertyisdeprivedofallreasonableeconomicuse.(3)HearingExaminerProcess.Thehearingexaminershallconductapublichearingonthevariancerequest.Decisionsofthehearingexam-inershallbefinalandconclusive.Publicnoticeshallbeprovidedasfollows:(a)Thedepartmentshallarrangeforatleastonepublicationofthenoticeofhearingtoappearinanewspaperofgeneralcirculationwithinthecountyatleast10daysbeforethehearing.Paymentofallpublicationfeesshallbetheresponsibilityoftheapplicant.(b)Thedepartmentshallsendnoticetoadjacentpropertyownersadvisingthemofthehearing.Thenoticeshallbemailedtotheownersofrecordofallpropertylyingwithin300feetofthepropertyatissue,atleast10daysbeforethepublichearing.Namesandaddressesofadjacentpropertyownersshallbeprovidedtothedepartmentbytheapplicant,subjecttodepartmentapproval.(c)Thedepartmentshallprovidetheappli-cantwithatleasttwocopiesofthehearingnotice,andonecopyofanaffidavitofposting.Theappli-cantshallpostthenoticesandmaintaintheminplaceforatleast10dayspriortothehearing,notincludingthedayofpostingorthedayofthehear-ing.Thenoticesshallbeplacedinconspicuouslocationsonornearthepropertyandshallberemovedbytheapplicantafterthehearing.Noticesshallbemountedoneasilyvisibleboardsprovidedbythedepartment.Theaffidavitofpostingshallbesigned,notarized,andreturnedtothedepartmentatleast10dayspriortothehearing.(d)Allhearingnoticesshallincludealegaldescriptionofthepropertyinvolved,andaconcisedescriptionofthevariancerequestedinlaylan-guage.(4)HearingExaminer-RequiredFindings.Areasonableeconomicusevariancemaybegrantedonlywhenthehearingexaminerfindsthattheapplicationmeetsallofthefollowingcriteria:(a)Noreasonableeconomicusewithlessimpactonthecriticalareaoritsbufferispossible.(b)Thereisnofeasibleon-sitealternativetotheproposedactivitiesthatwouldallowareason-ableeconomicusewithlessadverseimpactsto(19)Installationofnavigationaidsandbound-arymarkers.(20)Drillingordiggingandmaintenanceofwells;provided,thatimpactstocriticalareasandtheirbuffersareminimizedanddisturbedareasareimmediatelyrestored.(21)Theadministratormaydeterminethatanactivityiscloselyalliedorsimilartoanyactivityinthislist.Ifsuchanactivitydoesnotimpactthefunctionsandvaluesofanycriticalareaoritsbuff-ers,itmayalsobedeterminedtobeexempt.[Ord.3-08§1]18.22.080Nonconforminguses.(1)Anylegaluseorlegalstructureinexistencetheeffectivedateoftheordinancecodifiedinthischapterthatdoesnotmeetthebufferrequire-mentsofthischapterforanydesignatedcriticalareashallbeconsideredalegalnonconforminguse.on(2)Anyuseorstructureforwhichanapplica-tionhasvestedorforwhichapermithasbeenobtainedpriortotheeffectivedateoftheordinancecodifiedinthischapter,thatdoesnotmeetthebufferrequirementsofthischapterforanydesig-natedcriticalarea,shallbeconsideredalegalnon-conforminguse.(3)Alegalnonconforminguseorstructuremaybemaintainedorrepairedwithoutlimitationbythischapter.(4)Alegalnonconforminguseorstructurethathasbeendamagedordestroyedbyfireorothercalamitymayberestoredanditsimmediatelypre-vioususemayberesumed.[Ord.3-08§1J18.22.090Reasonableeconomicusevariance.(1)Generally.Iftheapplicationofthischapterwoulddenyallreasonableeconomicuseofthe18-114.36(Revised4/08) JeffersonCountyCode18.22.1U0criticalareasorassociatedbuffers.Feasibleon-sitealternativesshallinclude,butarenotlimitedto:(i)Reductionindensity,scope,scaleor(6)PerformanceBond.Theadministratormayrequireaperformancebondof120percentofthecostoftheoutstandingworkitemstobeaccom-plished.[Ord.3-08§1]intensity;(ii)Phasingofprojectimplementation;(iii)Changeintimingofactivities;and(iv)Revisionofroadorparcellayoutorrelatedsiteplanningconsiderations.(c)Theproposedvariancewillresultintheminimumfeasiblealterationorimpairmenttothecriticalareafunctionalcharacteristicsandexistingcontours,vegetation,fishandwildliferesources,andhydrologicalconditions.(d)Disturbanceofcriticalareashasbeenminimizedbylocatinganynecessaryalterationincriticalareabufferstotheminimumextentpossi-18.22.095Physicalseparation-Functionalisolation.Bufferareaswhicharebothphysicallysepa-ratedandfunctionallyisolatedfromacriticalanddonotprotectthecriticalareafromadverseimpactsshallbeexcludedfrombuffersotherwiserequiredbythischapter.Functionalisolationoccurduetoexistingpublicroads,structures,ticalseparating,oranyotherrelevantphysicalcharacteristic.Theadministratormayrequireabio-logicalsiteassessmenttodeterminewhetherthebufferisfunctionallyisolated.[Ord.3-08§1]ArticleIII.CriticalAquiferRechargeAreas18.22.100Classification.Criticalaquiferrechargeareasarenaturallyceptibleduetotheexistenceofpermeablesoilsoraseawaterwedgeincoastlineaquifers.Certainoverlyinglandusescanleadtowaterqualityand/orquantitydegradation.Thefollowingclassificationsdefinecriticalaquiferrechargeareas:(1)Susceptibleaquiferrechargeareasarethosewithgeologicandhydrologicconditionsthatpro-moterapidinfiltrationofrechargewaterstogroundwateraquifers.Forthepurposesofthisarti-cle,unlessotherwisedeterminedbypreparationofanaquiferrechargeareareportauthorizedunderthisarticle,thefollowinggeologicunits,asidenti-fiedfromavailableStateofWashingtonDepart-mentofNaturalResourcesgeologicmapping,definesusceptibleaquiferrechargeareasforeastJeffersonCounty:(a)Alluvialfans(Ha);(b)Artificialfill(Hx);(c)Beachsandandgravel(Hb);(d)Dunesand(Hd);(e)Floodplainalluvium(Hf);(0Vashonrecessionaloutwashindeltasandalluvialfans(Vrd);(g)Vashonrecessionaloutwashinmeltwaterchannels(Vro);(h)Vashonicecontactstratifieddrift(Vi);(i)Vashonablationtill(Vat);(j)Vashonadvanceoutwash(Vao);(k)Whidbeyformation(Pw);and(l)Pre-Vashonstratifieddrift(Py).(2)Thoseareasmeetingtherequirementsofsusceptibleaquiferrechargeareas(above)andwhichareoverlainbythefollowinglandareacanver-ble.(e)Theproposedvariancewillnotcausedegradationtosurfaceorgroundwaterquality.(f)Theproposedvariancecomplieswithallfederal,stateandlocalstatutory'andcommonlaw,includingtheEndangeredSpeciesAct,andstatu-torylawsrelatedtosedimentcontrol,pollutioncontrol,floodplainrestrictions,andon-sitewaste-waterdisposal,andcommonlawrelatingtoprop-ertyandnuisance.(g)Therewillbenomaterialdamagetonearbypublicorprivatepropertyandnomaterialthreattothehealthorsafetyofpeopleonoroffthesus-property.(h)Theinabilitytoderivereasonableeco-nomicuseofthepropertyisnottheresultofactionsbytheapplicantinsegregatingordividingthepropertyandcreatingtheundevelopablecondi-tionaftertheeffectivedateoftheregulationscodi-fiedinthischapter.(5)Conditions.(a)Ingrantingapprovalforreasonableeco-nomicusevariances,thehearingexaminermayrequiremitigatingconditions.(b)Ingrantingapprovalforreasonableeco-nomicusevariancesinvolvingdesignatedwet-lands,thehearingexaminershallconsiderthefollowingmitigatingconditions:(i)Provisionofamitigationplandemon-stratinghowtheapplicantintendstosubstantiallyrestorethesitetopredevelopmentconditionsfol-lowingprojectcompletion;and(ii)Therestoration,creationorenhance-mentofwetlandsandtheirbuffersinordertooffsettheimpactsresultingfromtheapplicant’sactions;theoverallgoalofanyrestoration,creationorenhancementprojectshallbenonetlossofwet-landsfunctionandacreage.usesas18-114.37(Revised4/11) 18.22.110geologicassessmentdemonstratethathighchlo-ridereadingsinaparticularareaareduetoconnateseawater,theareainquestionshallnotbeconsid-eredanatriskorhighriskSIPZ.Whenthestatusofanareaisinquestion,theUDCadministratorisresponsibleformakingthedeterminationbaseduponrecommendationfromcountydepartmentofhealthandhumanservices.[Ord.3-08§1]18.22.110Designation.JeffersonCountyshallprepareandexhibitdatedcriticalaquiferrechargeareamapswhichdemon-stratetheapproximatedistributionofthesuscepti-bleaquiferrechargeareas,specialaquiferrechargeprotectionareas,andseawaterintrusionprotectionzones.Thecriticalaquiferrechargeareamapsshallbeperiodicallyrevised,modified,andupdatedtoreflectadditionalinformation.[Ord.3-08§1]18.22.120Applicability.(1)Thefollowinglanduseactivitiesareconsid-eredhighimpactlandusesduetotheprobabilityand/orpotentialmagnitudeoftheiradverseeffectsongroundwaterandshallbeprohibitedinsuscep-tibleaquiferrechargeareasandspecialaquiferrechargeprotectionareas.Inallotherareasofthecountyoutsideofsusceptibleaquiferrechargeareasandspecialaquiferrechargeprotectionareas,theseactivitiesshallrequireanaquiferrechargeareareportpursuanttothisarticle:(a)Chemicalmanufacturingandreprocess-identifiedinthiscodearesubjecttotheprovisionsoftheprotectionstandardsinthisarticle:(a)Allindustriallanduses;(b)Allcommercialuses;(c)Allruralresidentiallanduses:(i)Requiringadiscretionaryuseorcon-ditionalusepermit;or(ii)Withnonconformingusesthatwouldotherwiserequireadiscretionaryuseorconditionalusepermit;(d)Unseweredplannedruralresidentialdevelopments;(e)Unseweredresidentialdevelopmentwithgrossdensitiesgreaterthanoneunitperacre.(3)Specialaquiferrechargeprotectionareasinclude:(a)Sole-sourceaquifersdesignatedbytheU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyinaccor-dancewiththeSafeDrinkingWaterActof1974(PublicLaw93-523);(b)SpecialprotectionareasdesignatedbytheWashingtonDepartmentofEcologyunderChapter173-200WAC;(c)Wellheadprotectionareasdeterminedinaccordancewithdelineationmethodologiesspeci-fiedbytheWashingtonDepartmentofHealthunderauthorityofChapter246-290WAC;(d)Groundwatermanagementareasdesig-natedbytheWashingtonDepartmentofEcologyincooperationwithlocalgovernmentunderChapter173-100WAC.(4)Seawaterintrusionprotectionzones(SIPZ)aquifersandlandoverlyingaquiferswithsomedegreeofvulnerabilitytoseawaterintrusion.SIPZdefinedeitherbyproximitytomarineshorelineorbyproximitytogroundwatersourcesthathavedemonstratedhighchloridereadings.AHislandsandlandareawithinone-quartermileofmarineshorelinesandassociatedaquiferstogethercom-thecoastalSIPZ.Additionally,areaswithinmg;(b)Creosote/asphaltmanufacturingortreat-ment(exceptthatasphaltbatchplantsmaybeper-mittedinsusceptibleaquiferrechargeareasonlyifsuchareaslieoutsideofspecialaquiferrechargeprotectionareasandonlyifbestmanagementprac-ticesareimplementedpursuanttoJCC18.20.240(2)(h)(iv)and18.30.170andanacceptedaquiferrechargeareareport);(c)Electroplatingandmetalcoatingactivj-arcarepose1,000feetofagroundwatersourcewithahistoryofchlorideanalysesabove100milligramsperliter(mg/L)arecategorizedaseitheratrisk(between100mg/Land200mg/L)orhighrisk(over200mg/L)SIPZ.Individualgroundwatersourceswithahistoryofchlorideanalysesabove200mg/Lshallbeconsidered“sea-saltwaterintrusionareas,”whichareamongthe“sourcesorpotentialsourcesofcontamination”listedinWAC173-160-171,implementingcodefortheWaterWellConstruc-tionAct.ties;(d)Hazardouswastetreatment,storageanddisposalfacilities;(c)Petroleumproductrefinementandrepro-cessing;(0Storagetanksforpetroleumproductsorotherhazardoussubstances,exceptwithacondi-tionaldiscretionaryuse“C(d)”permitapproval;(g)Recyclingfacilitiesasdefinedinthiscode;(h)Solidwastelandfills;(i)WastepilesasdefinedinChapter173-(a)Insomecases,highchloridereadingsmaybeindicativeofconnateseawater(i.e.,relicseawaterinaquifersasopposedtoactiveseawaterintrusion).Whenbestavailablescienceorahydro-304WAC;(j)Woodandwoodproductspreserving;18-114.38(Revised4/11) JeffersonCountyCode18.22.130(k)Storageandprimaryelectricalbatteryprocessingandreprocessing.(2)Allotherlandusesshallbesubjecttotheprotectionstandardscontainedinthisarticleandmitigatingconditionsincludedwithanaquiferrechargeareareport,whereapplicable.(3)SeawaterIntrusionProtectionZones.Marineshorelinesandislandsaresusceptibletoaconditionthatisknownasseawaterintrusion.Sea-waterintrusionisaconditioninwhichthesaltwa-ter/freshwaterinterfaceinanaquifermovesinlandsothatwellsdrilledonuplandareascannotobtainfreshwatersuitableforpublicconsumptionwithoutsignificantadditionaltreatmentandcost.Maintain-ingastablebalanceinthesaltwater/freshwaterinterfaceisprimarilyafunctionoftherateofaqui-ferrecharge(primarilythroughrainfall)andtherateofgroundwaterwithdrawals(primarilythroughwells).Newdevelopment,redevelopment,andlanduseactivitiesonislandsandincloseprox-imitytomarineshorelinesinparticularshouldbedevelopedinsuchamannertomaximizeaquilerrechargeandmaintainthesaltwater/freshwaterbalancetothemaximumextentpossible.[Ord.4-10§1(Exh.B);Ord.3-08§1]18.22.130Protectionstandards.(1)General.Thefollowingprotectionstandardsshallapplytolanduseactivitiesinsusceptibleaquiferrechargeareasandspecialaquiferprotec-tionareas,andwhenspecifiedinseawaterintru-sionprotectionzones,unlessmitigatingconditionshavebeenidentifiedinacriticalaquiferrechargereportthathasbeenpreparedpursuanttothisarti-(2)StormwaterDisposal.(a)Inallcriticalaquiferrechargeareas,stormwaterrunoffshallbecontrolledandtreatedinaccordancewithbestmanagementpracticesandfacilitydesignstandardsasidentifiedanddefinedintheStormwaterManagementManualforthePugetSoundBasin,asamended,andthestormwa-terprovisionscontainedinChapter18.30JCC.(b)Tohelppreventseawaterfromintrudinglandwardintoundergroundaquifers,allnewdevel-opmentactivityonMarrowstoneIsland,IndianIslandandwithinone-quartermileofanymarineshorelineshallberequiredtoinfiltrateallstormwa-terrunoffonsite.Theadministratorwillconsiderrequestsforexceptionstothispolicyonacase-by-casebasis.Thisprovisionisinterpretedasestab-lishingahierarchyinwhichthefirstandbestalter-nativeison-siteinfiltrationusingdry-wellsorothermethods;thesecondbestalternativeisdirectdis-chargeintomarinewatersthroughastormwatertightline.Inordertoutilizetheleastpreferredalter-native,whichisconsideredanexceptiontothepol-icy,applicantsmustdemonstratethroughageotechnicalorsimilarreportpreparedbyalicensedprofessionalthatbothon-siteinfiltrationanduplandoff-sitedisposalarenotpracticableorfeasible.Thereportmustincludecostfiguresforcomparison.(3)On-SiteSewageDisposal.(a)AlllandusesidentifiedinJCC18.22.120andspecialaquiferrechargeprotectionareasthatarealsoclassifiedassusceptibleaquiferrechargeareas(asdefinedinthisarticle)shallbedesignatedareasofspecialconcernWACTitle246.pursuantto(i)Suchdesignationshallidentifymini-mumlandareaandbestmanagementpracticesfornitrogenremovalasdesignparametersnecessaryfortheprotectionofpublichealthandgroundwaterquality.(ii)Bestmanagementpractices(BMPs)shallbeadoptedbyactionoftheboardofhealth.(b)Asnewinformationbecomesavailablethatwouldclassifyanareaasaspecialaquiferrechargeprotectionareaoranareaofspecialunderthisarticle,saidareamaybedesignatedassuchbythecounty.Anyadditionalareasofspe-cialconcerndesignatedthroughthisprocessshallreceivethesameprotectionsidentifiedinsubsec-tion(3)(a)ofthissection.(4)GolfCoursesandOtherTurfCultivation.Inallcriticalaquiferrechargeareas,golfcoursesshallbedevelopedandoperatedinamannerconsistentwiththemostcurrenteditionof“BestManagementPracticesforGolfCourseDevelopmentandOper-ation,”KingCountydepartmentofdevelopmentandenvironmentalservices.Recreationalandinsti-tutionalfacilities(c.g.,parksandschools)withextensiveareasofcultivatedturfshallbeoperatedinamannerconsistentwithportionsoftheafore-mentionedbestmanagementpracticespertainingtofertilizerandpesticideuse,storage,anddis-posal.Inseawaterintrusionprotectionzones,golfcoursesandotherturfcultivationusinggroundwa-terforirrigationshallbeprohibited,unlessthewatersourceislocatedoutsideofseawaterintru-sionprotectionzonesorinanapprovedpublicwatersupply.(5)Above-GroundStorageandUndergroundStorageTanks.Above-groundandundergroundstoragetanksshallbefabricated,constructed,installed,usedandoperatedinamannerwhichpre-ventsthereleaseofhazardoussubstancestothegroundorgroundwaterandbeconsistentwiththeDepartmentofEcology’sstandardsforconstruc-con-cemcle.18-114.39(Revised4/11) 18.22.130tionandinstallationunderChapter173-360WAC.Above-groundstoragetanksintendedtoholdorstorehazardoussubstancesshallbeprovidedwithanimperviouscontainmentarea,equivalenttoorgreaterthan100percentofthetankvolume,enclosingandunderlyingthetank;orensurethatothermeasuresareundertakenasprescribedbytheUniformFireCodewhichprovideanequivalentmeasureofprotection.Undergroundstoragetanksintendedtostorehazardoussubstancesshallpro-videanimpervioustertiarycontainmentareaunderlyingthetanksorensurethatothermeasuresareundertakenwhichprovideanequivalentmea-sureofprotection.Applicationforinstallationofundergroundstoragetanksnotprohibitedunderthisarticle,orapplicationforaconditionaldiscre-tionary“C(d)”usepermitapproval,shallbeaccompaniedbyanaquiferrechargereportpursu-anttothisarticle.(6)MiningandQuarrying.Miningandquarry-ingperformancestandardscontaininggroundwaterprotectionbestmanagementpracticespertainingtooperation,closure,andtheoperationofgravelscreening,gravelcrushing,cementconcretebatchplants,andasphaltconcretebatchplants,whereallowed,arecontainedinChapters18.20and18.30JCC.rechargeareareportperJCC18.22.400)thatdem-onstratesthatthecreationofnewlotsandcorre-spondinguseofwaterwillnotimpactthesubjectaquifersuchthatwaterqualityisdegradedbywaterintrusion.sea-(i)MarrowstoneMoratorium.DuetodocumentedIslandSubdivisionseawaterintru-siononMarrowstoneIslandandtheexistenceofundevelopedlotsofrecord,JeffersonCounty'hasimposedamoratoriumonadditionallanddivisionsontheislanduntilsuchtimeaspublicwaterisavailableoritisdemonstratedthroughthewellmonitoringprogramthatgroundwaterqualityisnotdegradingduetoseawaterintrusion.(c)BuildingPermits.(i)Evidenceofpotablewatermaybeanindividualwell,connectiontoapublicwatersys-tem,oranalternativesystem.Whatevermethodisselected,theregulatoryandoperationalstandardsforthatmethodmustbemet,includingJeffersonCountyhealthcodesandtheWashingtonAdminis-trativeCode.PursuanttoSection4oftheState“GuidelinesforDeterminingWaterAvailabilityforNewBuildings”(EcologyPublicationNo.93-27),investigationandidentificationofwellinter-ferenceproblemsandimpairmenttoseniorrightsistheresponsibilityoftheWashingtonDepartmentofEcology.Ifthepossibilityofaproblemi.pected,thelocalpermittingauthorityshouldtactEcology.(7)HazardousMaterials.Landuseactivitiesthatgeneratehazardouswaste,whicharenotpro-hibitedoutrightunderthiscode,andwhicharecon-ditionallyexemptfromregulationbytheWashingtonDepartmentofEcologyunderWAC173-303-100,orwhichuse,store,orhandlehaz-ardoussubstances,shallberequiredtoprepareandsubmitahazardousmaterialsmanagementplanthatdemonstratesthatthedevelopmentwillnothaveanadverseimpactongroundwaterquality.Thefacilityownermustupdatethehazardousmaterialsmanagementplanannually.(8)WellDrilling,LandDivision,andBuildingPermitsinSeawaterIntrusionProtectionZones.(a)WellDrilling.TheWashingtonStateDepartmentofEcologyregulateswelldrillingpur-suanttotheWaterWellConstructionAct.Pro-posedwells,includingthoseexemptfrompermittingrequirements,mustbesitedatleast100feetfrom“knownorpotentialsourcesofcontami-nation,”whichinclude“sea-saltwaterintrusionareas”(WAC178-160-171),unlessavarianceisobtainedfromEcologyperWAC173-160-106.(b)Subdivisions.Applicationsforlanddivi-sion(Chapter18.35JCC)mustincludespecificandconclusiveproofofadequatesuppliesofpota-blewaterthroughaqualifyinghydrogeologicassessment(relevantcomponentsofanaquiferISsus-con-(ii)Alltypesofbuildingpermitsthatrequireproofofpotablewaterusearesubjecttothispolicy,specificallybuildingpermitsfornewsingle-familyresidences(SFRs)orotherstructureswithplumbingthatarenotassociatedwithanexist-ingSFR(i.e.,shopsorgarageswithabathroom).(d)VoluntaryandmandatorymeasuresoftheJeffersonCountyseawaterintrusionpolicyapplytodevelopmentproposalswithinthecoastal,atrisk,andhighriskS1PZ,anduponMarrowstoneIsland,inthefollowingmanner,inadditiontoallexistingapplicablehealthcodes:(i)CoastalSIPZ.(A)VoluntaryActions.(I)Waterconservationmeasures;(II)Ongoingwellmonitoringforchlorideconcentration;(III)Submittalofdatatocounty.(B)MandatoryActions.(I)Forproofofpotablewateronabuildingpermitapplication,applicantmustutilizeDOH-approvedpublicwatersystemifavailable;(II)Ifpublicwaterisunavailable,anindividualwellmaybeusedasproofofpotablewatersubjecttothefollowingrequirements:18-114.40(Revised4/11) JeffersonCountyCode18.22.1301.Chlorideconcentrationofalab-oratory-certifiedwellwatersamplesubmittedwithbuildingpermitapplication;anydetrimentalinterferencewithexistingwaterrightsandisnotdetrimentaltothepublicinterest;2.Chlorideconcentrationofalab-oratory-certifiedwellwatersamplesubmittedwithbuildingpermitapplication;3.If2.Installationofsource-totalizingmeter(flow).(Ill)Ifpublicwaterisunavailable,aqualifyingalternativesystemmaybeusedasproofofpotablewater.(ii)AtRiskSIPZ.(A)VoluntaryActions.(I)Waterconservationmeasures.(B)MandatoryActions.(I)Forproofofpotablewateronabuildingpermitapplication,applicantmustutilizeDOH-approvedpublicwatersystemifavailable;(II)Ifpublicwaterisunavailable,individualwellmaybeusedasproofofpotablewatersubjecttothefollowingrequirements:1.Chlorideconcentrationofalab-chlorideconcentrationexceeds250mg/Linawatersamplesubmittedforabuildingpermit,thenthepropertyownershallberequiredtorecordarestrictivecovenantthatindi-catesachloridereadingexceededtheU.S.Envi-ronmentalProtectionAgencysecondarystandard(250mg/L)undertheNationalSecondaryDrink-ingWaterRegulations;4.Installationofasource-totaliz-ingmeterflow;5.Ongoingwellmonitoringforchlorideconcentration;an6.Submittalofflowandchloridedatatothecountypermonitoringprogram;(IV)Ifpublicwaterisunavailable,aqualifyingalternativesystemmaybeusedasproofofpotablewater.(iv)MarrowstoneIsland.InadditiontoallvoluntaryandmandatoryactionsassociatedwiththeapplicableSIPZasdescribedabove,thefollowingmeasuresapplytoalldevelopmentpro-posalsonMarrowstoneIslandthatincludeground-waterwithdrawal:oratory-certifiedwellwatersamplesubmittedwithbuildingpermitapplication;2.Installationofasource-totaliz-ingmeter(flow);3.Ongoingwellmonitoringforchlorideconcentration;4.Submittalofflowandchloridedatatothecountypermonitoringprogram;(III)Ifpublicwaterisunavailable,aqualifyingalternativesystemmaybeusedasproofofpotablewater.(iii)HighRiskSIPZ.(A)MandatoryActions.(I)Waterconservationmeasures(perlistmaintainedbyUDCadministrator);(II)Forproofofpotablewateronabuildingpermitapplication,applicantmustutilizeDOH-approvedpublicwatersystemifavailable;(III)Ifpublicwaterisunavailable,anindividualwellmayonlybeusedasproofofpotablewatersubjecttothefollowingrequire-ments:(A)VoluntaryActions.(I)Installationoftimerstogetherwithnewwellpumpinstallationstoenablepumpuselimitationtolowdemandtimes.(B)MandatoryActions.(I)Theuseofawellproposedasproofofpotablewaterforanewbuildingpermitshallbeconditionedthroughthebuildingpermitsuchthatenrollmentinacounty-sponsoredtoringprogramisrequired,includingperiodicsub-mittalofflowandchloridedataasdeterminedbythecounty.ingmeter(flow).mom-(II)Installationofasource-totaliz-1.VariancefromWACTitle173standardsgrantedbyEcologyperWAC173-160-106foranewgroundwaterwellwithin100feetofasea-saltwaterintrusionareaperWAC173-160-171(i.e.,within100feetofagroundwatersourceshowingchlorideconcentrationsabove200mg/Lorwithin100feetofthemarineshoreline);orforexistinggroundwaterwellnotsubjecttoanEcologyvariance,applicantmustprovideahydro-geologicassessment(relevantcomponentsofanaquiferrechargeareareportperJCC18.22.400),whichshallbetransmittedtoEcologyforreview,demonstratingthatuseofthewelldoesnotcause(III)Installationofavariablespeedpump,controllablefromthesurface,inordertoenablereductionofwithdrawalrate,asmaybenecessary.(IV)Installationofa1,000-gallonminimumstoragetankthatshallconformtoANSI/NSFStandard61.(9)MitigatingConditions.Theadministratormayrequireadditionalmitigatingconditions,asneeded,toprovideprotectiontoallcriticalaquiferrechargeareastoensurethatthesubjectlandorwateruseactionwillnotposeariskofsignificantadversegroundwaterqualityimpacts.Thedetermi-an18-114.41(Revised4/11) 18.22.135nationofsignificantadversegroundwaterqualityimpactswillbebasedontheanti-degradationpol-icyincludedinChapter173-200WAC.(10)AuthorityforDenial.Inallcriticalaquiferrechargeareas,theadministratormaydenyapprovaliftheprotectionstandardscontainedhereinoraddedmitigatingconditionscannotpre-ventsignificantadversegroundwaterqualityimpacts.[Ord.4-10§1(Exh.B);Ord.3-08§1]-18.22.135Adaptivemanagement.Aspartoftheperiodicreview'andamendmenttoJeffersonCounty’simplementingregulationsrequiredunderRCW36.70A.130(4),JeffersonCountyshallreviewtheneedforandimplementanadaptivemanagementprogramforgroundwaterresourcesincertaindiscretegeographicareasofthecounty,consistentwiththeprovisionsofWAC365-195-920(2).[Ord.3-08§l]ArticleIV.FrequentlyFloodedAreasArticleV.GeologicallyHazardousAreas18.22.160Classification/dcsignation.(1)Classification,areasshallbeclassifiedbasedGeologicallyhazardousuponacombinationoferosion,landslideandseismichazard.(2)Designation.Thefollowingerosion,land-slide,seismic,andchannelmigrationzone(CMZ)hazardareasshallbesubjecttothestandardsofthisarticle:(a)ErosionHazardAreas.AreascontainingsoilsorsoilcomplexesdescribedandmappedwithintheUnitedStatesDepartmentofAgricul-ture,SoilConservationService,SoilSurveyforJeffersonCountyashavingasevereorverysevereerosionhazardpotential.(b)LandslideHazardAreas.Areaspoten-tiallysubjecttomassmovementduetoacombina-tionofgeologic,topographicandhydrologicfactorsincluding:(i)Areasofhistoricfailurestiallyunstableslopes,suchas:(A)AreasdescribedandmappedashavingsevereorveryseverebuildinglimitationsfordwellingswithoutbasementswithintheUnitedStatesDepartmentofAgriculture,SoilConserva-tionService,SoilSurveyforJeffersonCounty;(B)Areasdescribedandmappedasrecentoroldlandslidesorslopesofunstablerialswithintheorpoten-18.22.140Incorporationbyreference.Thisarticleincorporatesbyreferencetheclassi-fication,designationandprotectionprovisionscontainedintheJeffersonCountyfloodplainman-agementordinance(Chapter15.15JCC)withthefollowingaddition:(1)Inadditiontotheinsurancemapsidentifiedinthefloodplainmanagementordinance(Chapter15.15JCC),floodhazardareasshallbeidentifiedwithreferencetothefederalEmergencyManage-mentAgency(FEMA)100-yearfloodplaindesig-nations.Suchfloodhazardareasshallbesubjecttothecriteriaofthefloodplainmanagementordi-nance.(2)Thefloodplainmanagementordinancecon-formswriththeintentoftheminimumguidelines(WAC365-190-080(3))throughdirectlyconsider-ingtheeffectsoffloodingonhumanhealthandsafety,togetherwitheffectsonpublicfacilitiesandservices,throughitsprotectionstandards.[Ord.3-08§1]mate-WashingtonStateDepartmentofEcologyCoastalZoneAtlasofJeffersonCounty';and(C)Areasdescribedandmappedasofpoornaturalstability,formerlandslidesandrecentlandslidesbytheWashingtonStateDepartmentofNaturalResources,DivisionofGeologyandEarthResources;(ii)Areaspotentiallyunstableasaresultofrapidstreamincision,streambankundercuttingbywaveaction;and(iii)Areaswithanyindicationsofearthmovement,suchas:areaserosion,or(A)Rockslides;(B)Earthflows;(C)Mudflows;and(D)Landslides.(c)SeismicHazardAreas.Areassubjecttosevereriskofdamageasaresultofearthquake-inducedgroundshaking,slopefailure,settlement,soilliquefaction,orsurfacefaulting.These,identifiedbythepresenceof:poorlydrainedsoilswithgreaterthan50percentsiltandverylittlecoarsematerial;loosesandorgravel,peat,artifi-cialfillandlandslidematerials;orsoilunitswithhighorganiccontent.18.22.150Relationshiptootherregulations.WhiletheJeffersonCountyfloodplainmanage-mentordinancerequiresconsistencywithallotherapplicablelaws,intheeventthataconflictshouldexistthestricterstandardshallapplytotheregu-lateddevelopment.[Ord.3-08§1]areasare18-114.42(Revised4/11) JeffersonCountyCode18.22.160(d)ChannelMigrationZones(CMZs).Areassubjecttothenaturalmovementofstreamchannelmeanders.Thoseareaswithinthedelin-eatedhighriskCMZarea(theareainwhichchan-nelmigrationislikelytooccurwithinthenext50years)aresubjecttothisarticle.Disconnectedmigrationareas,whichareareasthathavebeendis-connectedfromtheriverbylegallyexistingartifi-cialstructure(s)thatrestrainchannelmigration(suchasleveesandtransportationfacilitiesbuiltaboveorconstructedtoremainintactthroughthe100-yearfloodelevation)andarenolongeravail-ableformigrationbytheriver,shallbeexcludedfromreviewunderthisarticle.Moderatelyhigh,18-114.42a(Revised4/11) Thispageleftintentionallyblank.18-114.42b(Revised4/11) JeffersonCountyCode18.22.170moderate,andlowriskCMZsareasarealsoexcludedfromreviewunderthisarticle.(3)SourcesUsedforIdentification.Sourcesusedtoidentifygeologicallyhazardousareasinclude,butarenotlimitedto:(a)UnitedStatesDepartmentofAgricul-ture,SoilConservationService,SoilSurveyforJeffersonCounty.(b)WashingtonStateDepartmentofEcol-ogy,CoastalZoneAtlas.(c)WashingtonStateDepartmentofNaturalResources,SlopeStabilityandGeologicMapsofEasternJeffersonCounty.(d)WashingtonStateDepartmentofNatu-ralResources,GeographicInformationSystem:drainageanderosioncontrolplan,asspecifiedinthischapter,whentheprojectapplicationinvolveseitherofthefollowing:(i)Thealterationofageologicallyhaz-ardousareaoritsbuffer;or(ii)Thecreationofanewparcelwithinaknowngeologicallyhazardousarea.(b)Drainageanderosioncontrolplansrequiredunderthischaptershalldiscuss,evaluateandrecommendmethodstominimizesedimenta-tionofadjacentpropertiesduringandaftersiruction.con-(c)Surfacedrainageshallnotbedirectedacrossthefaceofamarinebluff,landslidehazardorravine.Theapplicantmustdemonstratethatthestormwaterdischargecannotbeaccommodatedsiteoruplandbyevidenceofageotechnicalreport,unlesswaivedbytheadministrator.Ifdrainagemustbedischargedfromablufftoadjacentwaters,itshallbecollectedabovethefaceofthebluffanddirectedtothewaterbytightlinedrainandpro-videdwithanenergydissipatingdeviceattheshoreline,aboveOHWM.(d)Inadditiontoanyerosioncontrolmeth-odsspecifiedinthedrainageanderosioncontrolplan,theadministratormayrequirehydroseedingofexposedordisturbedareasorotherBMPs.(3)ClearingandGrading.(a)InadditiontothegeneralclearingandgradingprovisionsinChapter18.30JCC,thefol-lowingprovisionsshallalsoapply:(i)Clearingwithingeologicallyhazard-ousareasshallbeallowedonlyfromApril1sttoNovember1st,unlesstheapplicantdemonstratesthatsuchactivitieswouldnotresultinimpactscon-trarytotheprotectionrequirementsherein;(ii)Onlythatclearingnecessarytoinstalltemporarysedimentationandtrolmeasuresshalloccurpriortoclearingforroadwaysorutilities;SoilSurvey.on(e)WashingtonStateDepartmentofNaturalResources,GeologicMapsofEasternJeffersonCounty,CompressibilityofEarthMaterialsinEasternJeffersonCounty.(f)UnitedStatesDepartmentoftheInterior,USGSQuadMaps.(g)U.S.DepartmentoftheInterior,BureauofReclamation,2004,ChannelMigrationZoneStudyfortheDuckabush,Dosewallips,BigQuilceneandLittleQuilceneRivers,JeffersonCounty,Washington.Denver,CO.(h)PerkinsGeosciences,2006,ChannelMigrationHazardMapsfortheDosewallips,Duckabush,BigQuilceneandLittleQuilceneRiv-JeffersonCounty,Washington.Seattle,WA.(i)PerkinsGeoscienceswithTerraLogicGIS,June2004,LowerHohRiverChannelMigra-tionStudySummaryReport.(j)ThefollowingriversarenotregulatedinthissectionasaresultofnothavingmappedCMZs(notanexhaustivelist):ThomdykeCreek,ShineCreek,ChimacumCreek,SnowCreek,SalmonCreek,UpperHohRiver,BogachielRiver,Clear-waterRiver,andQuinaultRiver.(4)GeologicHazardAreaMaps.Themapspre-paredbythecountyusingtheidentificationsourceslistedinthissectionhavebeenproducedforinformationalpurposesonlyandarenotregulatorydevicesforminganintegralpartofthiscode.[Ord.6-09§1(Exh.B);Ord.3-08§1]ers.erosioncon-(iii)Clearinglimitsforroads,septic,waterandstormwaterutilities,andtemporarysioncontrolfacilitiesshallbemarkedinthefieldandapprovedbytheadministratorpriortoanyalterationofexistingnativevegetation;(iv)Clearingforroadsandutilitiesshallremainwithinconstructionlimitswhichmustbemarkedinthefieldpriortocommencementofsitework;andero-18.22.170Protectionstandards.(1)General.Applicationforaprojectonaparcelofrealpropertycontainingadesignatedgeolog-icallyhazardousareaoritsbuffershalladheretotherequirementssetforthbelow.(2)DrainageandErosionControl.(a)Anapplicantsubmittingaprojectappli-cationshallalsosubmit,andhaveapproved,a(v)Theauthorizedclearingforroadsandutilitiesshallbetheminimumnecessarytoaccom-plishprojectspecificengineeringdesignsandshallremainwithinapprovedrights-of-way.(b)Thefollowingprovisionsregardinggradingshallapply:18-114.43(Revised3/10) 18.22.170theapplicantshallincludeonthefaceotanysuchinstrumenttheboundaryofthelandslidehazardareaanditsbuffer.(i)Anapplicantsubmittingaprojectapplicationshallalsosubmit,andhaveapproved,agradingplan,asspecifiedinthischapter,whentheapplicationinvolveseitherofthefollowing:(A)Thealterationofageologicallyhazardousareaoritsbuffer;or(B)Thecreationofanewparcelwithinaknowngeologicallyhazardousarea.(ii)Excavation,gradingandearthworkconstructionregulatedunderthissectionshallonlybeallowedfromApril1sttoNovember1st,unlesstheapplicantdemonstratesthatsuchactivitieswouldnotresultinimpactscontrarytotheprotec-tionrequirementsherein.(4)VegetationRetention.Thefollowingprovi-sionsregardingvegetationretentionshallapply:(a)Duringclearingforroadwaysandutili-ties,alltreesandunderstorylyingoutsideofapprovedconstructionlimitsshallberetained;pro-vided,thatunderstorydamagedduringapprovedclearingoperationsmaybepruned.(b)Damagetovegetationretainedduringinitialclearingactivitiesshallbeminimizedbydirectionalfellingoftreestoavoidcriticalareasandvegetationtoberetained.(c)Retainedtrees,understoryandstumpsmaysubsequentlybeclearedonlyifsuchclearingisnecessary'tocompletetheproposalinvolvedinthetriggeringapplication.(d)WithinahighriskCMZ,vegetationremovalshallnotbeallowed.VegetationremovaloutsideofahighriskCMZshallnotbereviewedunderthisarticle.Shouldthisprovisionconflictwithothervegetationretentionrequirementsspec-ifiedwithintheJCC,themorerestrictiveprotec-tionrequirementapplies.(5)BufferMarking.Thelocationoftheouterextentoflandslidehazardareabuffersshallbemarkedinthefieldasfollows:(a)Apermanentphysicalseparationalongtheboundaryofthelandslidehazardareashallbeinstalledandpermanentlymaintained.Suchsepa-rationmayconsistoflogs,atreeorhedgerow,fencing,orotherprominentphysicalmarkingapprovedbytheadministrator.(b)Bufferperimetersshallbemarkedwithtemporarysignsatanintervalofoneperparcelor100feet,whicheverisless.Signsshallcon-(6)Buffers-StandardRequirements.Thefol-lowinglandslidehazardareabufferprovisionsshallapply:(a)Bufferareasshallberequiredtoprovidesufficientseparationbetweenthelandslidehazardareaandtheadjacentproposedproject.(b)Theappropriatewidthofthelandslidehazardareabuffershallbedeterminedbyeither:applicationofthestandardbufferwidthsetforthbelow;orbyacceptanceofageotechnicalreportmeetingthecriteriaofthissection.(c)Buffersshallremainnaturallyvegetated.Wherebufferdisturbancehasoccurredduringcon-struction,replantingwithnativevegetationshallberequired.(d)Buffersshallberetainedintheirnaturalcondition;however,minorpruningofvegetationtoenhanceviewsmaybepermittedbytheadministra-toronacase-by-casebasis.(e)Allbuffersshallbemeasuredperpendic-ularlyfromthetop,toeoredgeofthelandslidehazardareaboundary.(0Astandardbufferof30feetshallbeestablishedfromthetop,toeandalledgesofland-slidehazardareas.(g)Abuildingsetbacklineisrequiredtobefivefeetfromtheedgeofanybufferareaforalandslidehazardareaortooutsidethefullextentofthehighriskchannelmigrationzone(CMZ),whicheverisgreater.(7)ReducingBufferWidths.Theadministratormayreducethestandardlandslidehazardbufferwidthonlywhentheprojectapplicantdem-onstrates,tothesatisfactionoftheadministrator,thattheprojectcannotmeettherequiredsetback.Thereducedbuffermustadequatelyprotecttheproposedprojectfromtherisksofthelandslidehazardareatothemaximumextentpossible.Undernocircumstancesshallthebufferwidthbereducedtolessthan15feet.(8)IncreasingBufferWidths.Theadministra-tormayincreasethestandardlandslidehazardareabufferwidthwhenalargerbufferisnecessarytoprotecttheproposedprojectandthelandslidehaz-ardarea.Thisdeterminationshallbemadewhentheadministratordemonstratesanyoneofthefol-lowingthroughappropriatedocumentation:(a)Thelandslideareaisunstableandactive.(b)Theadjacentlandissusceptibletoseverelandslideorerosion,anderosioncontrolmeasureswillnoteffectivelyprotecttheproposedareaeveryremaininplacepriortoandduringapprovedstructionactivities.Thesignsshallcontainthefob“LandslideHazardArea&lowingstatement:Buffer-DoNotRemoveorAlterExistingNativeVegetation.”(c)Inthecaseofshortplat,longplat,bind-ingsiteplanorsiteplanapprovalsunderthiscode.18-114.44(Revised3/10) JeffersonCountyCode18.22.200projectfromtherisksposedbythelandslidehazardarea.professional,containedwithinaspecialreportrequiredunderthischapter.[Ord.6-09§1(Exh.B);Ord.3-08§l](c)Theadjacentlandhasminimalvegeta-tivecover.(9)GeotechnicalReport.(a)Anapplicantsubmittingaprojectappli-cationshallsubmit,andhaveapproved,ageotech-nicalreport,asspecifiedinArticleVIIIofthischapter,whentheapplicationinvolvesanyofthefollowing:ArticleVI.FishandWildlifeHabitatConservationAreas(FWHCAs)18.22.195Compliancealternatives.ArticleVIsetsforththeprescriptiverequire-ments.Applicantsfordevelopmentpermitsorapprovalssubjecttothisarticlemayelecttoplywiththecriticalareastewardshipplan(CASP)provisionssetforthinArticleIXofthischapterinlieuoftheprescriptiverequirementssetforthherein.[Ord.3-08§1](i)Thealterationofalandslidehazardcomareaoritsbuffer.(ii)Thecreationofanewparcelwithinaknownlandslidehazardarea.(iii)Theconstructionofapubliclyownedfacilityinadesignatedseismichazardarea.(b)Whereageotechnicalreportisrequiredforalandslidehazardarea,theprojectapplicationshallnotbeapprovedunlessthegeotechnicalreportcertifiesallofthefollowing:(i)Thereisminimallandslidehazardasprovenbyalackofevidenceoflandslideactivityinthevicinityinthepast;(ii)Ananalysisofslopestabilityindi-catesthattheproposalwillnotbesubjecttoriskoflandslide,ortheproposalorthelandslidehazardbemodifiedsothathazardsareelimi-18.22.200Classification/designation.(1)Classification.Fishandwildlifehabitatconservationareas(FWHCAs)arethoseidentifiedasbeingofcriticalimportancetothemaintenanceofendangered,threatened,areasorsensi-tivespeciesoffish,wildlifeand/orplants,orspe-ciesoflocalimportance.Theseareasaretypicallyidentifiedeitherbyknownpointlocationsofspe-cificspecies(suchasanestorden)orbyhabitatareasorboth.Allareaswithinthecountymeetingthesecriteriaareherebydesignatedcriticalandaresubjecttotheprovisionsofthisarticle.(2)Mapping.Theapproximatelocationandextentofidentifiedfishandwildlifehabitatvationareas(FWHCAs)areshownonthecounty’scriticalareamaps.Thesemapsaretobeusedguideanddonotprovideadefinitivecriticaldetermination.ThecountyshallupdatethemapsasnewFWHCAsareidentifiedornewinformationrelatedtoupdatestoexistingmapsbecomesavail-able.areacannated;areas(iii)Theproposalwillnotincreasesur-facewaterdischargeorsedimentationtoadjacentpropertiesbeyondpredevelopmentconditions;(iv)Theproposalwillnotdecreaseslopestabilityonadjacentproperties;and(v)Allnewlycreatedbuildingsiteswillbestableundernormalgeologicandhydrogeologicconditions(ifapplicable).(c)Whereageotechnicalreportisrequiredforaseismichazardarea,theprojectapplicationshallnotbeapprovedunlessthegeotechnicalreportdemonstratesthattheproposedprojectwilladequatelyprotectthepublicsafety.[Ord.6-09§1(Exh.B);Ord.3-08§1]conser-asaarea(3)Designation.Thefollowingaredesignatedasfishandwildlifehabitatconservationareas(FWHCAs):(a)Areaswithwhichendangered,threat-ened,andsensitivespecieslistedbythefederalorstategovernmenthaveaprimaryassociation.(i)Federallydesignatedandthreatenedspeciesarethosefishandwildlifespeciesidenti-fiedbytheU.S.FishandWildlifeServiceandtheNationalMarineFisheriesServicethatareindan-gerofextinctionorthreatenedtobecomeendan-gered.TheU.S.FishandWildlifeServiceandtheNationalMarineFisheriesServicesshouldbesuitedforcurrentlistingstatus.(ii)Stateendangered,threatened,andsensitivespeciesarethosespeciesnativetothestateofWashingtonidentifiedbytheStateDepart-mentofFishandWildlifethatareindangerof18.22.180Conditions.(1)General.Ingrantingapprovalforaprojectapplicationsubjecttotheprovisionsofthisarticle,theadministratormayrequiremitigatingcondi-tionsthatwill,intheadministrator’sjudgment,substantiallysecuretheobjectivesofthisarticle.(2)BasisforConditions.Allconditionsofapprovalrequiredpursuanttothissectionshallbebaseduponeitherthesubstantiverequirementsofthissectionortherecommendationsofaqualifiedcon-18-114.45(Revised3/10) 18.22.210extinction,threatenedtobecomeendangered,vul-nerable,ordecliningandarelikelytobecomeendangeredwithinthestate.ThestatemaintainsthelistofthesespeciesinWAC232-12-014(endangeredspecies)andinWAC232-12-014(threatenedandsensitivespecies).TheStateDepartmentofFishandWildlifeshouldbecon-sultedforcurrentlistingstatus.(b)Riversandstreamsnototherwisepro-tectedunderWashingtonStateForestPracticesregulations(Chapter76.09RCWandWACTitle222)thathaveFWHCAsareprotectedaccordingtostreamtype.(3)ProcedureforDesignation-Generally.Anapplication/nominationtodesignateahabitatoflocalimportanceasacriticalareashallhepro-cessedaccordingtotheproceduresforTypeVlandusedecisionsestablishedinChapter18.40JCC.(4)Nominations/Applications.Anyperson,organization,orJeffersonCountyagencymaynominateandapplyfordesignationaspeciesorhabitatoflocalimportance.Anominatingpersonororganizationmustbearesidentof,orheadquar-teredin,JeffersonCounty.(5)Nomination/ApplicationSubmittal.(a)TheapplicantshallprovideinformationdemonstratingthatthespeciesorhabitatisnativetoJeffersonCounty,existingonorbeforethedateofadoptionoftheregulationscodifiedinthischapter.(b)Allnominations/applicationsfordesig-nationofaspecies/habitatoflocalsignificanceshallincludethefollowing:(i)Identificationofthespeciesincludingitsscientificandlocallycommonname(s);(ii)Identificationofthegeographicloca-tion,includingJeffersonCountyparcelnumbers,andextentofthehabitatassociatedwithanomi-natedspeciesorthenominatedhabitatitselfifnotassociatedwithanominated(c)LandscoveredundertheForestPrac-ticesAct.ForestedareasinJeffersonCountypro-videprotectionasFWHCAsundertheForestPracticesAct(Chapter76.09RCW)andforestpracticesregulations(WACTitle222).(d)Commercialandrecreationalshellfishareas,includingdesignatedshellfishhabitatcon-servationareas(note:shellfishaquacultureactivi-tieswithinallpublicandprivatetidelandsandbedlandssuitableforshellfishharvestarealloweduses;suchactivitiesincludebutarenotlimitedtobedmarking,preparation,planting,cultivation,andharvest).(e)Kelpandeelgrassbeds.(f)Surfsmelt,Pacificherring,andPacificsandlancespawningareas.(g)Naturalareapreservesandnaturalresourceconservationareas.(h)AllareasdesignatedbytheDepartmentofNaturalResources(DNR)throughtheWashing-tonNaturalHeritageProgramashighqualitywet-landecosystemsandhighqualityterrestrialspecies;amapofanappropriatescaletoproperlydescribethelocationandextentofthehabitatwillaccompanytheination,aswellasgeo-referencinginformationsuf-ficienttoallowmappingofthehabitatsiteinthecountyGISmappingsystem;(iii)Thestatusoftheoccurrenceofthetypeofhabitatnom-speciesortheinsurroundingcountiesandintherestofthestatehasbeenconsid-eredinmakingthisnomination;(iv)Amanagementstrategyfortheecosystems.spe-(i)SpeciesandhabitatsoflocalimportanceestablishedpursuanttotheprocessdelineatedinJCC18.22.210.(Ord.3-08§1]ciesorhabitat;(v)Indicationsastowhethertheposedmanagementstrategyhasbeenreviewed,andifso,howthiswhom;pro-peerdoneandbywas18.22.210Processandrequirementsfordesignatinghabitatsoflocalimportanceascriticalareas.(1)Purpose.Thissectiondescribestheprocessfordesignatingspeciesandhabitatsoflocalimpor-tancethatarenotcoveredbythefederalandstatesensitive,threatenedorendangeredspeciesregula-tions.Accordingly,thissectiondetailstherequire-mentsfordesignatingandmonitoringspeciesandhabitatsoflocalimportance,aswellasremovingsuchspeciesandhabitatsfromdesignationifnec-essary.(2)Definition.Theuseoftheterm“habitat”inthissectionincludesareasdesignatedas“wildlifecorridors.”(vi)Whererestorationofhabitatispro-posed,aspecificplan,includinghowtherestora-tionwillbefunded,mustbeprovidedaspartofthenomination;(vii)Recommendationsforallowed,exempt,andregulatedactivitieswithinthearea,(viii)Recommendedbufferandsetbackrequirementsandtheirjustification;(ix)Seasonalrequirements;(x)Amonitoringplanmustbepracticalandachievableandincludethefollowing:(A)Baselinedataandadescriptionofwhatmeasurementswillbeusedtodeterminethesuccessoftheproject.Theplanshallincludethe18-114.46(Revised3/10) JeffersonCountyCode18.22.210criteriaandtimeperiodrequiredtoevaluatethesuccessoftheplan;(B)Acontingencyplanforfailure;(C)Alistofallparcelsnotincludedinthenominationbutaffectedbythemonitoringpro-cess;(xi)Thenominationmustalsoincludeaneconomicimpact,costandbenefitsanalysis.Thenominationmustalsoincludeananalysisotalter-nativesolutionstoformaldesignationofthehabitatoflocalimportanceasaregulatedcriticalareaunderthischapter.(c)TheapplicantshallberesponsibleforpayingallfeesandallexpensesincurredbyJeffer-sonCountytoprocesstheapplication.18-114.46a(Revised3/10) Thispageleftintentionallyblank.18-114.46b(Revised3/10) JeffersonCountyCode18.22.220(6)ReviewandApprovalCriteria.(a)Speciesnominatedfordesignationunderthissectionmustsatisfythefollowingcriteria:(i)LocalpopulationsthatareindangerofextirpationbasedondocumentedtrendssincetheadoptionoftheGrowthManagementAct;(ii)Thespeciesissensitivetohabitatmentshallalsonotifyallparcelownersaffectedofthetermsandcontentsoftheproposal.(b)Uponreceiptofastaffreportandrecom-mendationfromthedepartment,theplanningcom-missionshallholdapublichearing,andmakearecommendationtotheboardofcommissionersbasedupontheapprovalcriteriasetforthinthissection.manipulation;(iii)Thespeciesorhabitathascommer-cial,game,orotherspecialvaluesuchaslocally(c)TheJeffersonCountyboardofcommis-sionersshallconsidertherecommendationtrans-mittedbytheplanningcommissionataregularlyscheduledpublicmeeting,andmaythenadoptanordinanceformallyapprovingthedesignation.Shouldtheboardwishtovaryfromtheplanningcommissionrecommendationandalterorrejecttheapplication,suchactionmayonlyoccurfollowingaseparatepublichearingconductedbytheboard.(d)Uponapproval,theordinancedesignat-ingandregulatingthespeciesorhabitatoflocalimportanceshallbecodifiedinthisarticleforpub-licinformationandimplementationbythedepart-ment,andanoticetotitleshallbeplaceduponallparcelsaffectedbythedesignation.(e)Eachordinancecreatingaspeciesorhabitatoflocalimportanceshallincludeperiodicrevieworreassessmentoftheinitialdesignation.Thelengthoftheperiodicreviewmaybedepen-dentonthecharacteristicsofthespeciesorhabitat.(8)RemovalfromDesignation.Speciesorhab-itatsoflocalsignificancemayberemovedatanytime;provided,thattheynolongermeetthecriteriasetforthinsubsection(5)ofthissection(e.g.,asaresultofanaturalcatastropheorclimaticchangeevent);andprovidedfurther,thattheproceduralrequirementsofthissectionandtheproceduralrequirementsestablishedforTypeVlandusedeci-sionssetforthwithinChapter18.40JCCaremet.[Ord.3-08§11rarespecies;(iv)Thenominationincludesananalysisoftheproposalusingbestavailablescience;and(v)Thenominationspecifieswhypro-tectionbyothercounty,stateorfederalpolicies,laws,regulationsornonregulatorytoolsisinade-quatetopreventdegradationofthespeciesorhab-itatandforwhichmanagementstrategiesarepracticable,anddescribeswhy,withoutdesigna-tionandprotection,thereisalikelihoodthatthespecieswillnotmaintainandreproduceoverthelongterm,orthatauniquehabitatwillbelost.(b)Habitatsnominatedfordesignationunderthissectionmustsatisfythefollowingcrite-ria:(i)Whereahabitatisnominatedtopro-tectaspecies,theuseofthehabitatbythatspeciesmustbedocumentedorbehighlylikelyorthehab-itatisproposedtoberestoredwiththeconsentoftheaffectedpropertyownersothatitwillbesuit-ableforusebythespecies;and,long-termpersis-tenceofthespeciesinJeffersonCountyandadjoiningcountiesisdependentontheprotection,maintenanceorrestorationofthehabitat;(ii)Areasnominatedtoprotectaparticu-larhabitatmustrepresenteitherhighqualitynativehabitatorhabitatthathasanexcellentpotentialtorecovertoahighqualityconditionandwhichiseitheroflimitedavailabilityorhighlyvulnerabletoalteration;18.22.220Sourcesusedforidentification.Sourcesusedtoidentifyfishandwildlifehabitatconservationareas(FWHCAs)include,butarenotlimitedto,thefollowing:(1)UnitedStatesDepartmentoftheInterior,FishandWildlifeService,NationalWetlandsInventory.(2)WashingtonStateDepartmentofNaturalResources,WaterTypeIndexMaps.(3)WashingtonStateDepartmentofFishandWildlife,Non-GameandPriorityHabitatsandSpeciesdatabases.(4)PublicandprivatetidelandsorbedlandssuitableforshellfishharvestandidentifiedbytheWashingtonDepartmentofHealth’sclassification(iii)Thenominationspecifiesthespe-cifichabitatfeaturestobeprotected(e.g.,nestsites,breedingareas,nurseries,etc.).Inthecaseofproposedwildlifecorridors,thenominationshallspecifythosefeaturesthatarerequiredforthecor-ridortoremainviabletosupportandprotectthenominatedspecies.(7)ReviewandApprovalProcess.(a)Thedepartmentofcommunitydevelop-mentshalldeterminewhethertheapplicationsub-mittaliscomplete.Ifdeemedcomplete,thedepartmentshallevaluatetheproposalforcompli-ancewiththeapprovalcriteriasetforthinthissec-tionandmakearecommendationtotheplanningcommissionbasedonthosecriteria.Thedepart-18-114.47(Revised4/08) 18.22.230systemandshellfishprotectiondistrictsestab-lishedpursuanttoChapter90.72RCW.(5)KelpandeelgrassbedsmaybeclassifiedandidentifiedwiththeDepartmentofNaturalResourcesAquaticLandsProgramandtheDepart-mentofEcology(note:manylocationsarecom-piledinthePugetSoundEnvironmentalAtlas).(6)Herringandsmeltspawningtimesandloca-tionsareoutlinedinWAC220-110-240through220-110-250,HydraulicCodeRules,TechnicalReportNo.79,andthePugetSoundEnvironmentalAtlas.[Ord.3-08§1]ordinary,highwatermarksunlessnootherreason-ablealternativeplacementexists;(d)Allstreamcrossingsshallbedesignedbasedonthe100-yearprojectedfloodflows,innon-fishbearingTypeNpandNsstreams.Inaddition,crossingsforTypeSandFstreamsshouldallowfordownstreamtransportoflargewoodydebris;(e)Crossingsshallservemultiplepropertieswheneverpossible;and(0Wherethereisnoreasonablealternativetoprovidingaculvert,theculvertshallbethemin-imumlengthnecessarytoaccommodatetheper-mittedactivity.(2)Utilities.Placementofutilitieswithindes-ignatedfishandwildlifehabitatareasmaybeallowedpursuanttothefollowingstandards:(a)Constructionofutilitiesmaybepermit-tedinF^WHCAsortheirbuffersonlywhennoprac-ticableorreasonablealternativelocationisavailableandtheutilitycorridormeetstherequire-mentsforinstallation,replacementofvegetationandmaintenanceoutlinedbelow.Utilitiesencouragedtofollowexistingorpermittedroadswherepossible.(b)Constructionofsewerlineseven18.22.230Fishandwildlifehabitatconservationarea(FWHCA)maps.CountymapsidentifyingFWHCAshavebeenproducedforinformationalpurposesonlyandarenotregulatorydevicesforminganintegralpartofthisarticle.[Ord.3-08§1]18.22.250Regulatedactivities.Anylanduseordevelopmentactivitythatissubjecttoadevelopmentpermitorapprovalrequirementsofthiscodeshallbesubjecttotheprovisionsofthisarticle.Theseinclude,butarenotlimitedto,thefollowingactivitiesthataredirectlyundertakenororiginateinaFWHCAoritsbuffer,unlessotherwiseexemptedunderJCC18.22.070:(1)StreamCrossings.Anyprivateorpublicroadexpansionorconstructionwhichisproposedandmustcrossstreamsclassifiedwithinthisarticleshallcomplywiththefollowingminimumdevel-opmentstandards:(a)ThedesignofstreamcrossingsshallmeettherequirementsoftheWashingtonDepart-mentofFishandWildlife.Fishpassageshallbeprovidedifnecessarytoaddressmanmadeobstruc-tionson-site.Otheralternativesmaybealloweduponashowingthat,forthesiteunderreview,thealternativeswouldbelessdisruptivetothehabitatorthatthenecessarybuildingfoundationswerenotfeasible.Submittalofahabitatmanagementplanwhichdemonstratesthatthealternativeswouldnotresultinsignificantimpactstothefishandwildlifehabitatarea(FWHCA)mayberequired;(b)Crossingsshallnotoccurinsalmonidspawningareasunlessnootherreasonablecrossingsiteexists.Fornewdevelopmentproposals,ifexistingcrossingsaredeterminedtoadverselyimpactsalmonspawningorpassageareas,neworupgradedcrossingsshallbelocatedasdeterminednecessarythroughcoordinationwiththeWashing-tonStateDepartmentofFishandWildlife;(c)Bridgepiersorabutmentsshallnotbeplacedeitherwithinthefloodwayorbetweentheareoron-sitesewagesystemsarenotpermittedinFWHCAsortheirbuffers,exceptthattheymaybepermittedinabufferareawhentheapplicantdemonstratesitisnecessarytomeetstateand/orlocalhealthcoderequirements;therearenootherpracticablealter-nativesavailable;andconstructionmeetstherequirementsofthisarticle.Jointuseoftheutilitycorridorbyotherutilitiesmaybeallowed.(c)NewutilitycorridorsshallnotbeallowedinFWHCAswithknownlocationsoffed-eralorstate-listedendangered,threatenedorlivespecies,exceptinthosecircumstanceswhereapprovedhabitatmanagementplanisinplace.(d)Utilitycorridorconstructionandmainte-nanceshallprotecttheenvironmentoffishandwildlifehabitatareasandtheirbuffers.(i)Newutilitycorridorsshallbealignedwhenpossibletoavoidcuttingtreesgreaterthan12inchesindiameteratbreastheight(fourandhalffeet)measuredontheuphillside.(ii)Newutilitycorridorsshallberevege-tatedwithappropriatenativevegetationatnotlessthanpreconstructionvegetationdensitiesorgreater,immediatelyuponcompletionofconstruc-tionorassoonthereafteraspossibleduetosonalgrowingconstraints.Theutilityshallthatsuchvegetationsurvivesforathree-yearperiod.sewersensi-anone-sea-ensure18-114.48(Revised4/08) JeffersonCountyCode18.22.250(e)Utilitytowersshouldbepaintedwithbrush,padorrollerandshouldnotbesandblastedorspray-painted,norshalllead-basedpaintsbeused.(6)Road/StreetRepairandConstruction.Anyprivateorpublicroadorstreetexpansionorcon-structionwhichisallowedinaFWHCAoritsbuffershallcomplywiththefollowingminimumdevelopmentstandards:(a)Nootherreasonableorpracticablealter-nativeexistsandtheproposedroadorstreetservesmultiplepropertieswheneverpossible;(b)Publicandprivateroadsareencouragedtoprovideforotherpurposes,suchasutilitycross-ings,pedestrianorbicycleeasements,viewingpoints,etc.;(3)BankStabilization.(a)Astreamchannelandbank,bluff,andshorelinemaybestabilizedwhennaturallyoccur-ringearthmovementthreatensexistinglegalstruc-tures(structureisdefinedforthispurposeasthoserequiringabuildingpermitpursuanttothebuildingcode),publicimprovements,uniquenaturalresources,publichealth,safetyorwelfare,ortheonlyfeasibleaccesstoproperty,and,inthecaseofstreams,whensuchstabilizationresultsinmainte-nanceoffishhabitatorimprovedwaterquality,asdemonstratedthroughahabitatmanagementplanorequivalentstudyorassessment.Bluff,bankandshorelinestabilizationshallfollowthestandardsoftheJeffersonCountyshorelinemasterprogram,geologicallyhazardousareasprovisioninthischapter,andthefloodplainmanagementordinance(Chapter15.15JCC).(b)Theadministratorshallrequirethatbankstabilizationbedesignedbyaprofessionalengi-neerlicensedinthestateofWashingtonwithdem-onstratedexpertiseinhydraulicactionsofshorelines.ForbankstabilizationprojectswithinFWHCAs,theapplicantmustprovideageotechni-calreportthatdemonstratesthatbioengineeringsolutions(vegetationversushardsurfaces)areinfeasible.Thereportmustdocumenttheengineer-ingrationalewhybioengineeringsolutionsareinfeasibleinamannerthatcanbeconfirmedthroughreviewbyotherengineeringprofessionals.BankstabilizationprojectsmayalsorequireahydraulicprojectapprovalfromtheWashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlifethatwillbedeter-minedafterconsultationwithWDFW.(4)GravelMining.Gravelminingisdiscour-agedwithinFWHCAsortheirbuffers,anditshallnotbepermittedifitcausesunmitigatablesignifi-cantadverseimpacts,butitmaybeallowedfollow-ingthereviewandapprovalofahabitatmanagementplan,includingadetailedminingandreclamationplanpursuanttotheapplicableperfor-mancestandardsinJCC18.20.240orasotherwiserequiredinthiscode.(5)ForestPractices,ClassIVGeneral.Timberharvestingwithassociateddevelopmentactivityinvolvinglandconversionsfromforestuse,oroth-erwisemeetingtheDNRdefinitionasaClassIVGeneralapplication,shallcomplywiththeprovi-sionsofthisarticle,includingthemaintenanceofbuffers,whererequired.(c)Theroadorstreetconstructionistheminimumnecessary,asrequiredbythedepartmentofpublicworks’guidelines.Minimumnecessaryprovisionsmayincludeprojectedlevelofservicerequirements;and(d)Constructiontimelimitsshallbedeter-minedinconsultationwiththeWashingtonDepart-mentofFishandWildlifeinordertoensurespeciesandhabitatprotection.(7)OutdoorRecreation,EducationandTrails.Activitiesandimprovementsthatdonotsignifi-cantlyaffectthefunctionoftheFWHCAorregu-latedbuffer(includingviewingstructures,outdoorscientificorinterpretivefacilities,trails,huntingblinds,etc.)maybepermittedinFWHCAsortheirbuffers.(a)Trailsandotherfacilitiesshall,totheextentfeasible,beplacedonexistingroadgrades,utilitycorridors,orotherpreviouslydisturbedareas;(b)Trailsandotherfacilitiesshallbeplannedtominimizeremovaloftrees,shrubs,snagsandimportantwildlifehabitat;(c)Viewingplatforms,interpretivecenters,benchesandaccesstothem,shallbedesignedandlocatedtominimizeimpactstowildlife,fish,ortheirhabitatand/orcriticalcharacteristicsoftheaffectedFWHCA;(d)Trails,ingeneral,shallbesetbackfromstreamssothattherewillbeminimalimpacttothestreamfromtrailuseormaintenance.Trailsshallbeconstructedwithpervioussurfaceswhenfeasi-bleandtrailswithinFWHCAsarenotintendedtobeusedbymotorizedvehicles.(8)ChemicalApplicationorStorage.ChemicalapplicationsarenotpermittedwithinFWHCAsunlessexpresslyapprovedaspartofafarmplan,forestpracticesapplication,orforthecontrolofinvasiveornoxiousplantspecies.Incaseswhereapprovedchemicalapplicationsoccuraspartofaforestpracticesapplicationorfarmplan,properreportingproceduresshallbefollowed.Chemical18-114.49(Revised4/08) 18.22.265storageshallnotbepermittedwithinaFWHCAoritsbuffer.[Ord.3-08§1)18.22.265Habitatmanagementplans-Whenrequired.Whenadevelopmentproposalislocatedonlandswhichmaycontainahabitatforaprotectedspeciesotherthanbaldeaglenestingterritories,orwhentheapplicantproposestoalter,decreaseoraveragethestandardbuffer,ahabitatmanagementplan(HMP)shallberequired,consistentwiththerequirementsofJCC18.22.440.[Ord.3-08§1]18.22.270Protectionstandards.(1)General.Applicationforaprojectonapar-celofrealpropertycontainingadesignatedFWHCAoritsbuffershalladheretotherequire-mentssetforthinthissection.(2)DrainageandErosionControl.Anapplicantsubmittingaprojectapplicationshallalsosubmit,andhaveapproved,adrainageanderosioncontrolplan,asspecifiedinthischapter.(3)Grading.Anapplicantsubmittingaprojectapplicationshallalsosubmit,andhaveapproved,agradingplan,asspecifiedinthischapter.(4)VegetationRetention.Thefollowingprovi-sionsregardingvegetationretentionshallapply:(a)Alltreesandunderstorylyingoutsideofroadrights-of-wayandutilityeasementsshallberetained(exceptforhazardtrees)duringclearingforroadwaysandutilities;provided,thatunder-storydamagedduringapprovedclearingopera-tionsmaybepruned.(b)Damagetovegetationretainedduringinitialclearingactivitiesshallbeminimizedbydirectionalfellingoftreestoavoidcriticalareasandvegetationtoberetained.(c)Retainedtrees,understoryandstumpsmaysubsequentlybeclearedonlyifsuchclearingisnecessarytocompletetheproposalinvolvedintheprojectapplication.(5)Buffers-StandardRequirements.TheadministratorshallhavetheauthoritytorequirebuffersfromtheedgesofallFWHCAsinaccor-dancewiththefollowing:(a)BuffersGenerally.(i)Buffersshallbeestablishedforactiv-itiesadjacenttoFWHCAsasnecessarytoprotecttheintegrity,functionsandvaluesoftheresource,consistentwiththerequirementssetforthinTables18.22.270(1)and18.22.270(2)ofthissection.(ii)Abuildingsetbacklineoffivefeetisrequiredfromtheedgeofanybufferarea;how-ever,nonstructuralimprovementssuchassepticdrainFieldsmaybelocatedwithinsetbackareas.(iii)Buffersshallberetainedntheirnat-uralcondition;however,minorpruningofvegeta-tiontoenhanceviewsorprovideaccessmaybepermittedaslongasthefunctionandcharacterofthebufferarenotdiminished.(iv)LightingshallbedirectedawayfromtheFWHCA.(b)PrescriptiveFWHCABuffers.(i)Thestandardbufferwidthsrequiredbythisarticleareconsideredtobetheminimumrequiredtoprotectthestreamfunctionsandvaluesatthetimeoftheproposedactivity.Whenabufferlacksadequatevegetationtoprotectcriticalfunctions,theadministratormaydenyaproposalforbufferreductionorbufferaveraging.(ii)Thestandardbuffershallbesuredlandwardhorizontallyonbothsidesofthestreamfromtheordinaryhighwatermark(OHWM)asidentifiedinthefield.Nevertheless,therequiredbuffershallincludeanyadjacentreg-ulatedwetland(s),landslidehazardareasand/orerosionhazardareasandrequiredbuffers,butshallnotbeextendedacrosspavedroadsorotherlaw-fullyestablishedstnicturesorhardenedsurfaces.Thefollowingstandardbufferwidthrequirementsareestablished;provided,thatportionsofstreamsthatflowundergroundmaybeexemptfromthesebufferstandardsattheadministrator’sdiscretionwhenitcanbedemonstratedthatnoadverseeffectsonaquaticspecieswilloccur.areamea-Table18.22.270(1):StreamBuffers*Type“S”-ShorelineStreams150feetType“F”-FishBearingStreams150feetType“Npv-Non-FishBearingPerennialStreamsType“Ns”-Non-FishBearingSeasonalStreamsgreaterthanorequalto20%gradeType“Ns”-Non-FishBearingSeasonalStreamslessthan20%gradeNote:(a)Thebufferssetforthaboveshallapplytoculvertedstreams,thoughinlimitedcircumstances,avariancemaybemadeintheapplicationofstreambuffersunderArticleIXofChapter18.40JCC.(b)StreamtypeshallbedeterminedusingthecriteriasetforthinVVAC222-16-03075feet75feet50feet18-114.50(Revised4/08) 18.22.270JeffersonCountyCode(iii)BuffersforOtherFWHCAs.TheadministratorshalldetermineappropriatebufferwidthsforotherFWHCAsbasedonthebestavailableinformation.Bufferwidthsfornonstreamhabitatconservationareasshallbeasfollows:Table18.22.270(2):BuffersforOtherFWHCAsAreaswithWhichFederallyListedSpeciesHaveaPrimaryAssociationBuffersshallbe150feet;provided,thatlocalandsitespe-cificfactorsshallbetakenintoconsiderationandthebufferwidthbasedonthebestavailableinformationconcerningthespecies/habitat(s)inquestionand/ortheopinionsandrecom-mendationsofaqualifiedprofessionalwithappropriateexpertise.Buffersshallextend150feetlandwardfromordinaryhighwatermarkofthemarineshore.CommercialandRecreationalShellfishAreasBuffersshallextend150feetlandwardfromordinaryhighwatermarkofthemarineshore.KelpandEelgrassBedsSurfSmelt,PacificHerring,andPacificSandLanceSpawningAreasBuffersshallextend150feetlandwardfromordinaryhighwatermarkofthemarineshore.Pondsunder20acres-buffersshallextend50feetfromtheordinaryhighwatermark;Lakes20acresandlarger-buffersshallextend100feetfromtheordinaryhighwatermark;provided,thatwherevegetatedwetlandsareassociatedwiththeshoreline,thebuffershallbebasedonthewetlandbufferrequirements.Buffersshallnotberequiredadjacenttotheseareas.Theseareasareassumedtoencompassthelandrequiredforspeciespreservation.Thebufferformarinenearshorehabitatsshallextendland-ward150feetfromtheordinaryhighwatermark.Theneedforanddimensionsofbuffersforotherlocallyimportantspeciesorhabitatsshallbedeterminedonacase-by-casebasis,accordingtotheneedsofthespecificspeciesorhabitatareaofconcern.Buffersshallnotberequiredadjacenttothewildlifecorridor.TheadministratorshallcoordinatewiththeWashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlifeandotherstate,federalortribalexpertsintheseinstances,andmayuseWDFWPHSmanagementrecommendationswhenavailableandapplicable.NaturalPondsandLakesNaturalAreaPreservesandNaturalResourceConservationAreasLocallyImportantHabitatAreas(6)Theadministratorshallhavetheauthoritytoreducebufferwidthsonacase-by-casebasis;pro-vided,thatthespecificstandardsforavoidanceandminimizationsetforthinJCC18.22.350(1)shallapply,andwhentheapplicantdemonstratestothesatisfactionoftheadministratorthatallofthefol-lowingcriteriaaremet:(a)Thebufferreductionshallnotadverselyaffectthehabitatfunctionsandvaluesoftheadja-centFWHCAorothercriticalarea.(b)Thebuffershallnotbereducedtolessthan75percentofthestandardbuffer.(c)TheslopesadjacenttotheFWHCAwithinthebufferareaarestableandthegradientdoesnotexceed30percent.(7)Theadministratorshallhavetheauthoritytoaveragebufferwidthsonacase-bycasebasis;pro-vided,thatthespecificstandardsforavoidanceandminimizationsetforthinJCC18.22.350(1)shall18-114.51(Revised4/08) 18.22.280professionalutilizingbestavailablescience,con-tainedwithinaspecialreportrequiredunderthischapter.[Ord.3-08§1]apply,andwhentheapplicantdemonstratestothesatisfactionoftheadministratorthatallthefollow-ingcriteriaaremet:(a)ThetotalareacontainedinthebufferareaafteraveragingisnolessthanthatwhichwouldbecontainedwithinthestandardbufferandallincreasesinbufferdimensionareparalleltotheFWHCA.ArticleVII.Wetlands18.22.290Stewardshipalternative.ArticleVIIsetsforththeprescriptiverequire-mentsforwetlands.Applicantsfordevelopmentpermitsorapprovalssubjecttothisarticlemayelecttocomplywiththecriticalareastewardshipplan(CASP)provisionssetforthinArticleIXofthischapterinlieuoftheprescriptiverequirementssetforthherein.CASPmaybeappliedwithinCat-egoryII,III,andIVwetlandsandbuffers,andwithinbuffersinCategoryI.TheycannotbeusedinCategoryIwetlands.[Ord.3-08§1](b)ThebufferaveragingdoesnotreducethefunctionsorvaluesoftheFWHCAorriparianhab-itat,orthebufferaveraging,inconjunctionwithvegetationenhancement,increasesdiehabitatfunction.(c)Thebufferaveragingisnecessaryduetositeconstraintscausedbyexistingphysicalcharac-teristicssuchasslope,soils,orvegetation.(d)Thebufferwidthisnotreducedtolessthan75percentofthestandardwidth.(e)TheslopesadjacenttotheFWHCAwithinthebufferareaarestableandthegradientdoesnotexceed30percent.(f)BufferaveragingshallnotbeallowedifFWHCAbuffersarereducedpursuanttosubsec-tion(6)ofthissection.(8)BufferMarking.Thelocationoftheouterextentofrequiredbuffersshallbemarkedinthefieldasfollows:(a)DuringConstruction.Bufferperimetersshallbemarkedwithtemporarysignsatanintervalofoneperparcelorevery100feet,whicheverisless.Signsshallremaininplacepriortoandduringapprovedconstructionactivities.Thesignsshallcontainthefollowingstatement:“Buffer-DoNotRemoveorAlterExistingNativeVegetation.”(9)Inthecaseofshortplat,longplat,bindingsiteplan,andsiteplanapprovalsunderthiscode,theapplicantshallincludeonthefaceofanysuchinstrumenttheboundaryoftheFWHCA.(10)TheapplicantmayalsochoosetodedicatethebufferthroughaconservationeasementordeedrestrictionthatshallberecordedwiththeJeffersonCountyauditor.Sucheasementsorrestrictionsshall,however,usetheformsapprovedbytheprosecutingattorney.[Ord.3-08§1]18.22.300Classiflcation/designation.(1)Classification.Wetlandsshallbeclassifiedusingthe2004WashingtonStateDepartmentofEcology’sWetlandRatingSystemforWesternWashington(EcologyPublicationNo.04-06-025),orasamended.Wetlandratingcategoriesshallnotbedeterminedbaseduponillegalmodificationoftheland.WetlanddelineationsshallbedeterminedbyusingtheWashingtonStateWetlandsIdentifi-cationandDelineationManual,March1997,orasamendedhereafter.(2)Designation.Asdeterminedusingthe1997WashingtonStateDepartmentofEcology'sWash-ingtonStateWetlandsIdentificationandDelinea-tionManual(EcologyPublicationNo.96-94orasamended),wetlandsshallbedesignatedascriticalareasandregulatedunderthisarticleregardlessofsize;provided,thatCategoryIVwetlandslessthanone-tenthacre(4,356squarefeet)shallheexemptfromtherequirementsofthisarticlewhenallofthefollowingcriteriaaremet:(a)Thewetlanddoesnotprovidebreedinghabitatfornativeamphibianspecies.Breedinghabitatisindicatedbyadequateandstableseasonalinundation,presenceofthin-stemmedemergentvegetation,andcleanwater;(b)Thewetlanddoesnothaveuniquechar-acteristicsthatwouldbedifficulttoreplacethroughstandardcompensatorymitigationprac-tices;18.22.280Conditions.(1)General.Ingrantingapprovalforaprojectapplicationsubjecttotheprovisionsofthisarticle,theadministratormayrequiremitigatingcondi-tionsthatwill,intheadministrator’sjudgment,substantiallysecuretheobjectivesofthisarticle.(2)BasisforConditions.Allconditionsofapprovalrequiredpursuanttothisarticleshallbebaseduponeitherthesubstantiverequirementsofthisarticleortherecommendationsofaqualified(c)Thewetlandisnotlocatedwithinafishandwildlifehabitatconservationarea(FWHCA)asdefinedinthesectionofthischapterdealingwithFWHCAs,andisnotintegraltothemainte-nanceofhabitatfunctionsofanFWHCA;(d)Thewetlandisnotlocatedwithinaifloodplain;18-114.52(Revised4/08) JeffersonCountyCode18.22.330(e)Thewetlandisnotassociatedwithashorelineofthestateasdefinedbythecounty’sshorelinemasterprogram;(f)Thewetlandisnotpartofamosaicofwetlandsanduplands,asdeterminedusingtheguidanceprovidedinthewetlandratingsystem.(3)SourcesUsedforIdentification.Thefol-lowingsourcesshouldbeusedtoidentifypotentialwetlandlocations.Sourcesinclude,butarenotlim-itedto:(b)Asignificantchangeofphysicalorchemicalcharacteristicsofwetlandswatersources,includingquantity;or(c)Theintroductionofpollutants;or(9)WetlandBuffers.Inadditiontothoseactiv-itiesallowedinregulatedwetlandsinthisarticle,thefollowingactivitiesareallowedwithinwetlandbufferswithouthavingtomeettheprotectionstan-dardsorrequirementsforwetlandstudiesormiti-gation,setforthinthisarticle;provided,thatimpactstobuffersareminimizedandthatdisturbedareasareimmediatelyrestoredexceptasspecifi-callyallowedinJCC18.22.070.(a)Activitieshavingminimaladverseimpactsonbuffersandnoadverseimpactsonreg-ulatedwetlands.Theseincludelowintensity,pas-siverecreationalactivities,suchaspervioustrails,nonpermanentwildlifewatchingblinds,scientificoreducationalactivities,andsportsfishingorhunt-ing.Trailswithinbuffersshallbedesignedtomin-imizeimpactstothewetland,andshallnotincludeanyimpervioussurfaces.(b)WithinthebuffersofCategoryIIIandIVwetlandsonly,vegetation-linedswalesdesignedforstormwatermanagementorconvey-ancewhentopographicrestraintsdeterminetherearenootheruplandalternativelocations.Swalesusedfordetentionpurposesmayonlybeplacedintheouter25percentofthebuffer.Conveyanceswalesmaybeplacedthroughthebuffer,ifneces-sary.[Ord3-08§1](a)UnitedStatesDepartmentoftheInterior,FishandWildlifeService,NationalWetlandsInventory.(b)UnitedStatesDepartmentofAgricul-ture,SoilConservationService,SoilSurveyofJef-fersonCountyAreas,Washington.(c)UnitedStatesDepartmentofAgricul-ture,NaturalResourcesConservationService,HydricSoilsList,JeffersonCountyArea.(d)Countycriticalareasmapping.Thewet-landmapspreparedbythecountyhavebeenpro-ducedforinformationalpurposesonlyandarenotregulatorydevicesforminganintegralpartofthisarticle.[Ord.3-08§1]18.22.310Regulatedactivities.AnylanduseordevelopmentactivityshallbesubjecttotheprovisionsofthisArticleVII,includ-ing,butnotlimitedto,thefollowingactivitiesthataredirectlyundertakenororiginateinaregulatedwetlandoritsbuffer,unlessexemptedunderJCC18.22.070:(1)Theremoval,excavation,grading,ordredg-ingofmaterialofanykind,includingtheconstruc-tionofpondsandtrails;(2)Thedumpingordischargingofanymate-rial,orplacementofanyfill;(3)Thedraining,flooding,ordisturbingofthewetlandwaterlevelorwatertable;(4)Thedrivingofpilings;(5)Theplacingofobstructions;(6)Theconstruction,reconstruction,demoli-tion,orexpansionofanystructure;(7)Thedestructionoralterationofwetlandvegetationthroughclearing,harvesting,shading,intentionalburning,applicationofherbicidesorpesticides,orplantingofvegetationthatwouldalterthecharacterofaregulatedwetland;pro-vided,thattheseactivitiesarenotpartofaforestpracticegovernedunderChapter76.09RCW(For-estPracticesAct)anditsrules;(8)Activitiesthatresultin:(a)Asignificantchangeofwatertempera-18.22.330Protectionstandards.(1)General.Applicationforaprojectonapar-celofrealpropertycontainingadesignatedwet-landoritsbuffershalladheretotherequirementssetforthbelow.(2)Delineation.Anapplicantsubmittingaprojectapplicationshallalsosubmit,andhaveapproved,awetlanddelineationreportasspecifiedinJCC18.22.450.Additionally,thefollowingpro-visionsshallapply:(a)Thelocationofthewetlandanditsboundaryshallbedeterminedthroughtheperfor-manceofafieldinvestigationutilizingthemethod-ologycontainedintheWashingtonStateWetlandsIdentificationandDelineationManual,March1997,orasamendedhereafter.(b)Ifthewetlandislocatedoffoftheprop-ertyinvolvedintheprojectapplicationandisinac-cessible,thebestavailableinformationshallbeusedtodeterminethewetlandboundaryandcate-gory.(c)Thewetlandboundaryshallbestakedorflaggedinthefield.Hire;18-114.53(Revised4/08) 18.22.330tainingthebufferwidthsthatwouldbeprescribedforitsassociatedwetlandcategory.(c)Proposalsfordevelopmentwillhavethreeoptionsfordecidingwhattheirbufferdis-tancewillbe.Abufferdistanceistheclosestdis-tancetheproposeddevelopmentcanbetothewetlandboundary.(i)Thestewardshipplanoption,asdetailedinArticleIXofthischapter.(ii)TheProfessionallyDelineatedBoundaryOption.Aprescriptivebufferdistancebasedonanactualdelineationofthewetlandboundaryasdeterminedbyaqualifiedwetlandevaluator(costistheresponsibilityofproponent).Thisbufferdistancewillbemeasuredoutwardfromthedelineatedwetlandboundary.Refertothecolumninthetableswiththeword“delineation”intheheading.(d)Thisrequirementmaybewaivedunderthefollowingcircumstances:(i)Single-FamilyResidences.Therequirementforawetlanddelineationandspecialreportmaybewaivedbytheadministratorforcon-structionofasingle-familyresidenceonanexist-inglotofrecordifDCDstafforaqualifiedwetlandevaluatordeterminesthat:(A)Sufficientinformationexistsforstafftoestimatetheboundariesofawetlandwith-outadelineation;and(B)Thesingle-familyresidenceandallaccessorystructuresandusesarenotproposedtobelocatedwithinthedistancesidentifiedinTable18.22.330(1)fromtheestimatedwetlandboundary.“Qualifiedwetlandevaluator”meansanindividualrecognizedandacceptabletotheadmin-istratorinusingthemostcurrenteditionoftheDepartmentofEcology’sWashingtonStateWet-landRatingSystemforWesternWashington(2004),EcologyPublicationNo.04-06-025,orasamended,incategorizingandratingwetlands.(ii)SubdivisionsandShortSubdivi-sions.Therequirementforawetlanddelineationandspecialreportwillbewaivedforsubdivisionsandshortsubdivisionsofanexistinglotofrecordifasiteassessmentmadebyaqualifiedwetlandevaluatorindicatesthefollowing:(A)Sufficientinformationexiststoestimatetheboundariesofawetlandwithouta(iii)TheApparentBoundaryOption.Aprescriptivebufferdistancebasedontheapparentlocationofthewetlandboundaryasproposedbythecounty’swetlandspecialist.Inthesecasesthebufferwillbethetotaldistancecalculatedusingthebufferdistanceasshowninthe“delineation”col-umnofthetablesplusanadditional20to50feet,dependinguponwetlandcategory(showninthe“nondelineation”columnofthetable).Thiscalcu-latedbufferdistancewillbemeasuredoutwardfromtheapparentwetlandboundary.(4)DrainageandErosionControl.Anapplicantsubmittingaprojectapplicationshallalsosubmit,andhaveapproved,adrainageanderosioncontrolplanasspecifiedinthischapter.Theplanshalldis-cuss,evaluateandrecommendmethodstomini-mizesedimentationofdesignatedwetlandsduringandafterconstruction.delineation;and(B)Buildingenvelopesorbuildingsetbacklinesarenotproposedtobelocatedwithinthedistancesidentifiedinfables18.22.330(1),(2)and(3)fromtheestimatedwetlandboundary.(3)WetlandBufferRequirements.Wetlandbufferwidthsshallbeprescribedandestablishedbaseduponthecategoryofthewetland,thewet-landratingscoresandtheimpactlevelofthepro-posedlanduse.TheresultingbuffersareshowninTables18.22.330(1),(2),and(3)(forlow,moder-ateandhighimpactlanduses).(a)Thecategoryandratingscoresofawet-landshallbedeterminedbyaqualifiedwetlandevaluatorwhomustberecognizedandacceptabletotheadministratorandusethemostcurrentedi-tionoftheDepartmentofEcology’s“WetlandsinWashingtonStateVolume2:GuidanceforProtect-ingandManagingWetlands”(DOEPublicationNo.05-06-0008)incategorizingandratingwet-(5)BufferMarking.Uponapprovalofthedelineationreport,thelocationoftheouterextentofthewetlandbuffershallbemarkedinthefieldasfollows:(a)Apermanentphysicalindicatoralongtheuplandboundaryofthewetlandbufferareashallbeinstalledandpermanentlymaintained.(b)Duringconstructionactivities,bufferperimetersshallbemarkedwithtemporarysignsatanintervalofoneperparcelorevery100feet,whicheverisless.Signsshallremaininplacepriortoandduringapprovedconstructionactivities.Thesignsshallcontainthefollowingstatement:“Wet-land&Buffer-DoNotRemoveorAlterExistingNativeVegetation.”(c)Inthecaseofshortplat,longplat,bind-ingsiteplan,andsiteplanapprovalsunderthiscode,theapplicantshallincludeonthefaceofanylands.(b)Therearethreelanduseimpactleveltypes.Eachtypeispresentedwiththetablecon-18-114.54(Revised4/03) JeffersonCountyCode18.22.330suchinstrumenttheboundaryofthewetlandanditsbuffer.(d)Theapplicantmayalsochoosetodedi-catethebufferthroughaconservationeasementordeedrestrictionthatshallberecordedwiththeJef-fersonCountyauditor.Sucheasementsorrestric-tionsshall,however,usetheformsapprovedbytheprosecutingattorney.(6)Buffers-StandardRequirements.(a)Theadministratorshallhavetheauthor-itytorequirebuffersfromtheboundariesofallwetlandsasestablishedbythisarticle,andinaccordancewiththefollowingcriteria.(i)Wetlandbufferwidthsshallbemea-suredalongahorizontallineperpendiculartothewetlandboundaryasmarkedinthefieldduringdelineationifrequired,orbaseduponsiteinvesti-gation,aerialphotographs,orLiDARimages.(ii)Functionallyisolatedbufferareasarethoseareasseparatedfromawetlandthatdonotprotectthewetlandfromadverseimpacts.Buffersneednotincludeareasthatarefunctionallyisolatedandphysicallydisconnectedfromthewetlandbyasubstantialdevelopedsurfacesuchasadike,build-ing,parkinglot,orroad.Indeterminingwhetherornotabufferareaisfunctionallyisolated,theadministratorshalltakeintoconsiderationwhetherornottheisolatedbufferareaisusedbywildlifetogainaccesstothewetland.Ininstanceswheresub-stantialwildlifeuseisdocumented,theareashallberetainedasbufferdespitebeingotherwiseiso-latedordisconnectedfromthewetland.(iii)Whenabufferisonaslopesteeperthan40percent,and/orlacksadequatelydenseanddiversevegetation,theadministratormaydenyaproposalforbufferreductionorbufferaveraging.(b)Theprescribedbufferwidthsshallbeestablishedonthebasisofthefollowingfactors:(i)Thewetland’svalueandsensitivitytodisturbance,basedonitscategory(I,II,III,IV)asdeterminedbythetotalscoreontheratingformforthewetlandratingsystem;(ii)Theexpectedlevelofimpactoftheproposedadjacentlanduse,asdeterminedfromTables18.22.330(1),(2),and(3).Theadministra-tormaydetermine,onthebasisofdetailedinfor-mationfromtheapplicantaboutthesiteconditions,scope,andintensityoftheproposeddevelopment,thattheproposedlandusewillhavealesserlevelofimpactonthewetlandthanindicatedbysimilarlandusesonthelist.18-114.55(Revised4/08) 18.22.330Table18.22.330(1)WETLANDCATEGORIES,RATINGSCORESANDBUFFERWIDTHSFORLOWIMPACTLANDUSESLowimpactlandusesshallincludethefollowing:•Privatedrivewaysservingnomorethantworesidentialparcels;•Unpavedtrails(whennotexemptedbyJCC18.22.070);•Utilitycorridors(privateorpublic)withoutamaintenanceroad;•Landscaping,lawns,graveldriveways,etc.+AnAdditionalDistancefromanApparentWetlandBoundary(NotDelineated)WetlandCharacteristics•Habitat(H)•WaterQuality(WQ)BufferWidthwithanIdentifiedWetlandBoundary(Delineated)WetlandCategory'IV[Totalofscoreslessthan30points]25feet+20feet(Totalofscoresforallfunctionsislessthan30points)[WithHscore20-28points][Notmeetingabovecharacteristic!Ill75feet40feet+30feet(Totalofscoresforallfunctionsis30-50points)II[WQscore24-32pointsandHscorelessthan20points][Hscore29-36points][Hscore20-28points][Estuarine]flnterdunal][Notmeetingabovecharacteristics]50feet+40feet(Totalofscoresforallfunctionsis51-69pointsorhaving“specialcharacteristics”identifiedintheratingform)150feet75feet75feet75feet50feet[WQscore24-32pointsandIIscorelessthan20points][Hscore29-36points][Hscore20-28points][CoastalLagoon][Estuarine][NaturalHeritageWetland][Bog][Forested]50feetI+50feet(Totalofscoresforallfunctionsismorethan70pointsorhaving“specialcharacteristics”identifiedintheratingform)150feet75feet100feet100feet125feet125feetBufferwidthbasedonscoreforHfunctionsorWQfunctions|[Notmeetingabovecharacteristics]150feetNote:Wetlandsshallbeclassifiedusingthe2004WashingtonStateDepartmentofEcology’sWetlandRatingSystemforWesternWashington(EcologyPublicationNo.04-06-025),orasamended.18-114.56(Revised4/08) JeffersonCountyCode18.22.330Table18.22.330(2)WETLANDCATEGORIES,RATINGSCORESANDBUFFERWIDTHSFORMODERATEIMPACTLANDUSESModerateimpactlandusesshallincludethefollowing;•Single-familyresidentialuseonparcelsofoneacreorlarger;•Privateroadsordrivewaysservingthreeormoreresidentialparcels;•Pavedtrails;•Passiverecreationareas;•Utilitycorridors(privateorpublic)withamaintenanceroad;»ClassIV-Gcneralforestconversions,includingconversionoptionharvestplans.+AnAdditionalDistancefromanApparentWetlandBoundary(NotDelineated)WetlandCharacteristics;•Habitat(H)•WaterQuality(WQ)BufferWidthwithanIdentifiedWetlandBoundary(Delineated)WetlandCategoryIV[Totalofscoreslessthan30points]40feet+20feel(Totalofscoresforallfunctionsislessthan30points)III[WithHscore20-28points][Notmeetingabovecharacteristic]110feet60feet+30feet(Totalofscoresforallfunctionsis30-50points)11[WQscore24-32pointsandHscorelessthan20points)[Hscore29-36points)[Hscore20-28points)[Estuarine)[Interdunal][Notmeetingabovecharacteristics]75feet+40feet(Totalofscoresforallfunctionsis51-69pointsorhaving“specialcharacteristics”identifiedintheratingform)225feet110feet110feet110feet75feetI[WQscore24-32pointsandHscorelessthan20points][Hscore29-36points][Hscore20-28points][CoastalLagoon][Estuarine][NaturalHeritageWetland][Bog][Forested]75feet+50feet(Totalofscoresforallfunctionsismorethan70pointsorhaving“specialcharacteristics”identifiedintheratingform)225feet110feet150feet150feet190feet190feetBufferwidthbasedscoreforHfunctionsorWQfunctions75feeton|[Notmeetingabovecharacteristics)jNote:Wetlandsshallbeclassifiedusingthe2004WashingtonStateDepartmentofEcology'sWetlandRatingSystemforWesternWashington(EcologyPublicationNo.04-06-025),orasamended.18-114.57(Revised4/08) 18.22.330Table18.22.330(3)WETLANDCATEGORIES,RATINGSCORESANDBUFFERWIDTHSFORHIGHIMPACTLANDUSESHighimpactlandusesshallincludethefollowing:•Single-familyresidentialuseonparcelssmallerthanoneacre;•Commercial,multifamily,industrialandinstitutionaluses;•Publicroads.+AnAdditionalDistancefromanApparentWetlandBoundary(NotDelineated)WetlandCharacteristic:•Habitat(H)WaterQuality(WQ)BufferWidthwithanIdentifiedWetlandBoundary(Delineated)WetlandCategoryIV[Totalofscoreslessthan30points]50feet+20feet(Totalofscoresforallfunctionsislessthan30points)III[WithHscore20-28points][Notmeetingabovecharacteristic]150feet80feet+30feet(Totalofscoresforallfunctionsis30-50points)II[WQscore24-32pointsandHscorelessthan20points][Hscore29-36points][Hscore20-28points][Estuarine][Interdunal][Notmeetingabovecharacteristics]100feet+40feet(Totalofscoresforallfunctionsis51-69pointsorhaving“specialcharacteristics”identifiedintheratingform)300feet150feet150feet150feet100feet[WQscore24-32pointsandHscorelessthan20points][Hscore29-36points][Hscore20-28points](CoastalLagoon][Estuarine][NaturalHeritageWetland][Bog][ForestedJ100feetI+50feet(Totalofscoresforallfunctionsismorethan70pointsorhaving“specialcharacteristics”identifiedintheratingform)300feet150feet200feet200feet250feet250feetBufferwidthbasedonscoreforHfunctionsorWQfunctions100feet[Notmeetingabovecharacteristics]em(7)ReducingBufferWidths.Uponsubmissionofaspecialreportbyaqualifiedprofessionalthatdemonstratesabufferreductiondoesnothaveanyadverseimpactontheexistingfunctionsandvaluesofthewetland,theadministratorshallhavetheauthoritytoreducetheprescribedbufferwidths,(withinadefinedarea),listedinthesectionabove;provided,thatallofthefollowingshallapply:(a)ThebufferofaCategoryIorIIwetlandisnotreducedtolessthan75percentoftherequiredbufferor50feet,whicheverisgreater;(b)ThebufferofaCategoryIIIorIVwet-landisnotreducedtolessthan75percentoftherequiredbuffer,or25feet,whicheverisgreater;(c)Theapplicantimplementsreasonablemeasurestoreducetheadverseimpactsofstruc-turesandappurtenancesonthesubjectparcelasdeterminedbytheadministrator;(d)Bufferareareductionshallbemini-mizedtoaccommodateonlythosestructuresandappurtenancesasapprovedbytheadministrator.18-114.58(Revised4/08) JeffersonCountyCode18.22.350(8)AveragingBufferWidths.Uponsubmissionofaspecialreportbyaqualifiedprofessionalthatdemonstratesabufferreductiondoesnothaveanyadverseimpactontheexistingfunctionsandvaluesofthewetland,theadministratorshallhavetheauthoritytoaveragewetlandbufferwidthsonacase-by-casebasis;provided,thatallofthefollow-ingshallapply:(a)Thebufferaveragingdoesnothaveanyadverseimpactonthefunctionsandvaluesofthewetland;Wildlife,ortheWashingtonDepartmentofEcol-ogy-(2)Type2NoncompensatoryEnhancement.Type2noncompensatoryenhancementprojectsinvolvewetlandalterationsthatdonotincludethefilling,draining,orexcavatingofaregulatedwet-land.Suchprojectsmightinvolvetheremovalofnonnativeplantspeciesortheplantingofnativeplantspecies.AllapplicationsforType2noncom-pensatoryenhancementprojectsshallbeaccompa-niedbyanenhancementplanpreparedinaccordancewithsubsections(2)(a)through(2)(c)ofthissection,whichdemonstratesthatthepro-posedactivitieswillresultinanincreaseinwetlandfunctionsandvalues.(b)Thetotalareacontainedwithinthebufferafteraveragingisnolessthanthatwhichwouldbecontainedwithintheprescribedbuffer,andthebufferboundaryremainsmoreorlesspar-alleltothewetlandboundaryinordertoavoidthecreationofpanhandles;(c)Themostsensitive,orhighestvalue,areasofthewetlandhavethewidestbufferdimen-sions,andthebufferboundarytakesintoaccountvariationsinslope,soils,orvegetationtooptimizetheoveralleffectivenessofthebuffer;(d)Theminimumbufferwidthisnolessthan75percentofthestandardprescribedbufferwidth;(a)Theenhancementplanshallbesubmit-tedforreview,andapproved,bytheadministrator.(b)Theenhancementplanmustincludeadetaileddescriptionoftheactivityincludingthefollowinginformation:(i)Thegoaloftheenhancementproject;(ii)Whatplants,ifany,willberemovedorplanted;(iii)Howtheactivitywillbeconducted,includingthetype(s)oftoolsormachinerytobeused;and(e)Thebufferhasnotbeenreducedinaccordancewithsubsection(5)ofthissection.Bufferaveragingisnotallowedifthewidthoftheentirebufferhasbeenreducedalready.[Ord.3-08(iv)Thequalificationsoftheindividualwhowillbeconductingtheenhancementactivity.(c)TheenhancementplanmusteitherbepreparedbyaqualifiedwetlandsconsultantoracceptedinwritingbytheU.S.FishandWildlifeService,theWashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlife,ortheWashingtonDepartmentofEcol-ogy.[Ord.3-08§1]§l]18.22.340Noncompensatoryenhancement.NoncompensatoryenhancementprojectsarethosewhichareconductedsolelytoincreasethefunctionsandvaluesofanexistingwetlandandwhicharenotrequiredtobeconductedpursuanttothemitigationrequirementsofJCC18.22.330.Therearetwotypesofnoncompensatoryenhance-ment:18.22.350Mitigation.Theoverallgoalofmitigationshallbenonetlossofwetlandfunction,value,andacreage.(1)MitigationSequence.Mitigationincludesavoiding,minimizing,orcompensatingforadverseimpactstoregulatedwetlandsortheirbuffers.Whenaproposeduseordevelopmentactivityposespotentiallysignificantadverseimpactstoaregulatedwetlandoritsbuffer,thepreferredsequenceofmitigationasdefinedbelowshallbefollowedunlesstheapplicantdemonstratesthatoverridingpublicbenefitwouldwarrantanexcep-tiontothispreferredsequence.(a)Avoidingtheimpactaltogetherbynottakingacertainactionorpartsofactionsonthatportionofthesitewhichcontainstheregulatedwetlandoritsbuffer;(b)Minimizingimpactsbylimitingthedegreeormagnitudeoftheactionanditsimple-mentation;(1)Type1NoncompensatoryEnhancement.Type1noncompensatoryenhancementprojectsinvolvethefilling,draining,orexcavatingofareg-ulatedwetland.AllapplicationsforType1non-compensatoryenhancementprojectsshallbeaccompaniedbyanenhancementplanpreparedinaccordancewithsubsections(l)(a)and(l)(b)ofthissection,whichdemonstratesthattheproposedactivitieswillresultinanincreaseinwetlandfunc-tionsandvalues.(a)Theenhancementplanmustbesubmit-tedforreview,andapprovedbytheadministrator.(b)TheenhancementplanmusteitherbepreparedbyaqualifiedwetlandsconsultantoracceptedinwritingbytheU.S.FishandWildlifeService,theWashingtonDepartmentofFishandan18-114.59(Revised4/08) 18.22.350JCC,compensatorymitigationshallberequiredtooffsetimpactsresultingfromtheactionsoftheapplicantoranycodeviolator.(a)Exceptpersonsexemptunderthisarti-cle,anypersonwhoaltersorproposestoalterreg-ulatedwetlandsshallrestoreorcreateareasofwetlandequivalenttoorlargerthanthosealteredinordertocompensateforwetlandlosses.Thefol-lowingtablespecifiestheratiosthatapplytocre-ationorrestorationthatisin-kind,on-site,andisaccomplishedpriortoorconcurrentlywithalter-ation:(c)Rectifyingtheimpactbyrepairing,reha-bilitating,orrestoringtheaffectedenvironment;(d)Reducingoreliminatingtheimpactovertimebypreservationandmaintenanceoperationsduringthelifeoftheaction;or(e)Compensatingfortheimpactbyreplac-ing,enhancing,orprovidingsubstituteresourcesorenvironments.(2)CompensatoryMitigationRequirements.Asaconditionofanypermitorotherapprovalallowingalterationwhichresultsinthelossordegradationofregulatedwetlands,orasanenforcementactionpursuanttoChapter18.50GeneralTable18.22.350RequiredReplacementRatiosforCompensatoryWetlandMitigationRe-establishmentorCreation(R/C)andRehabilitation(RH)Re-establishmentorCreation(R/C)andEnhancementEnhancementOnlyRehabilitationOnlyRe-establishmentorCreationCategoryandTypeofWetlandImpactsllll(E)1:1R/Cand2:1E1:1R/Cand1:1RH6:13:11.5:1AllCategoryIV1:1R/Cand2:lRH1:1R/Cand4:1E8:14:12:1AllCategoryIIICase-by-caseCase-by-caseCase-by-case4:1Case-by-caseCategoryIIEstuanneRehabilitationofanestuannewetland1:1R/Cand2:1RHCompensationhastobeinterdunalwetlandNotconsideredanoption2Notconsideredanoption24:12:1CategoryIIInterdunalCompensationhastobeinterdunalwetlandCompensationhastobeinterdunalwetland1:1R/Cand8:1F.1:1R/Cand4:1RH12:16:13:1AllOtherCategoryII1:1R/Cand10:1RH1:1R/Cand20:1E24:112:16:1CategoryIForested1:1R/Cand6:1RH1:1R/Cand12:1E16:18:14:1CategoryIBasedonScoreforFunctionsR/Cnotconsideredpossible2R/Cnotconsideredpossible3Case-by-case6:1NotconsideredpossibleCategoryINaturalHeritageSite3RehabilitationofaNaturalHeritagesiteR/CnotconsideredpossibleR/Cnotconsideredpossible3Case-by-case6:1Notconsideredpossible3CategoryICoastalLagoon3RehabilitationofacoastallagoonR/CnotconsideredpossibleR/CnotconsideredpossibleCase-by-case6:1Notconsidered•7possible'CategoryI33RehabilitationofaBogbog18-114.60(Revised4/08) JeffersonCountyCode18.22*350Table18.22.350RequiredReplacementRatiosforCompensatoryWetlandMitigationRehabilitationOnlyRe-establishmentorCreationCategoryandTypeofWetlandImpactsRe-establishmentorCreation(R/C)andRehabilitation(RH)Re-establishmentorCreation(R/C)andEnhancementEnhancementOnly111l(E)6:1Case-by-caseCase-by-caseCategory1EstuarineCase-by-caseCase-by-caseRehabilitationofanestuarinewetlandTheseratiosarebasedontheassumptionthattherehabilitationorenhancementactionsimplementedrepresenttheaveragedegreeofimprovementpossibleforthesite.Proposalstoimplementmoreeffectiverehabilitationorenhancementactionsmayresultinalowerratio,whilelesseffectiveactionsmayresultinhigherratio.Thedistinctionbetweenrehabilitationandenhancementisnotclear-cut.Instead,rehabilitationandenhancementactionsspanacontinuum.Proposalsthatfallwithinthegrayareabetweenrehabilitationandenhancementwillresultinaratiothatliesbetweentheratiosforrehabilitationandtheratiosforenhancement.2Duetothedynamicnatureofinterdunalsystems,enhancementisnotconsideredanecologicallyappropriateaction.3Naturalheritagesites,coastallagoons,andbogsareconsideredirreplaceablewetlandsbecausetheyperformfunctionsthatcannotbereplacedthroughcompensatorymitigation.Impactstosuchwetlandswouldthereforeresultinanetlossofsomefunctionsnomatterwhatkindofcompensationisproposed.some(b)Compensationmustbecompletedpriortowetlanddestruction,wherepossible.(c)Compensatorymitigationmustfollowanapprovedcompensatorymitigationplanpursu-anttothisarticle,withthereplacementratiosasmeetidentifiedgoals(forexample,replacementofhistoricallydiminishedwetlandtypes).Whereout-of-kindreplacementisaccepted,greateracreagereplacementratiosmayberequiredtocompensateforlostfunctionalvalues.(d)Off-sitecompensationcanbeallowedspecifiedabove.(d)Compensatorymitigationmustbecon-ductedonpropertythatwillbeprotectedandman-agedtoavoidfurtherdevelopmentordegradation.Theapplicantorcodeviolatormustprovideforlong-termpreservationofthecompensationarea.(e)Theapplicantshalldemonstratesuffi-cientscientificexpertise,supervisorycapability,andfinancialresources,includingbonding,tocarryouttheproject.Theapplicantmustdemon-stratethecapabilityformonitoringthesiteandmakingcorrectionsiftheprojectfailstomeetpro-jectedgoals.onlyif:(i)On-sitecompensationisnotfeasibleduetohydrology,soils,waves,orotherfactors;(ii)On-sitecompensationisnotpracticalduetoprobableadverseimpactsfromsurroundinglanduses;(iii)Potentialfunctionalvaluesatthesiteoftheproposedrestorationaresignificantlygreaterthanthelostwetlandfunctionalvalues;or(iv)Off-sitecompensationwillbeductedinaccordancewithsubsection(4)ofthissection(CooperativeCompensationProjects).(e)Exceptinthecaseofcooperativecom-pensationprojects,off-sitecompensationmustoccurwithinthesamewatershedwherethewet-landlossoccurs;provided,thatCategoryIVwet-landsmaybereplacedoutsideofthewatershedifthereisnoreasonabletechnicalalternative.ThestormwaterstoragefunctionprovidedbyCategoryIVwetlandsmustbeprovidedforwithinthedesignofthedevelopmentproject.(f)Exceptinthecaseofcooperativepensationprojects,inselectingcompensationsitesapplicantsmustpursuelocationsinthefollowingorderofpreference:con-(f)Compensatorymitigationmustmonitortheimpactandtakeappropriatecorrectivemea-sures.(3)CompensatoryMitigation-Type,Location,andTiming.(a)Prioritywillbegiventoin-kind,on-sitecompensationiffeasibleandifthewetlandtobelosthasamoderatetohighfunctionalvalue.(b)Whenthewetlandtobeimpactedisofalimitedfunctionalvalueandisdegraded,compen-sationmaybeofthewetlandcommunitytypemostlikelytosucceedwiththehighestfunctionalvaluepossible.com-(c)Out-of-kindcompensationmaybeallowedwhenout-of-kindreplacementwillbest18-114.61(Revised4/08) 18.22.360adjacenttothedevelopmentproposalsite,andassesstheimpactsofanyalterationproposedforacriticalarea.(4)Thespecialreportshallproposeadequateprotectionmechanismsthatmayincludemitiga-tion,maintenanceandmonitoringplans,andper-formancesurety.(5)Specialreportsshallincludedocumentationcertifyingthequalificationsoftheprepirer.[Ord.3-08§1](i)Filled,drained,orclearedsiteswhichwereformerlywetlandsandwhereappropriatehydrologyexists;and(ii)Uplandsites,adjacenttowetlands,iftheuplandissignificantlydisturbedanddoesnotcontainamatureforestedorshrubcommunityofnativespecies,andwheretheappropriatenaturalhydrologyexists.(g)Constructionofcompensationprojectsmustbetimedtoreduceimpactstoexistingwild-lifeandflora.Constructionmustbetimedtoassurethatgradingandsoilmovementoccursduringthedryseason.Plantingofvegetationmustbespecifi-callytimedtotheneedsofthetargetspecies.(h)Amitigationplanshallincludeamoni-toringplan.Theduration,frequencyandmethodsofmonitoringdependonaproject’sgoals,objec-tives,andperformancestandards.Ingeneral,mon-itoringisrequiredforatleastfiveyears.Ifascrub-shruborforestedvegetativecommunityispro-posed,monitoringmayberequiredfor10yearsormore.Monitoringmaybeextendedifinterimper-formancestandardsarenotmet.(4)CooperativeCompensationProjects.Thecountymayencourage,facilitate,andapprovecooperativeprojectswhereoneormoreapplicants,anorganizationwithdemonstratedcapability,mayundertakeacompensationprojectifitisdem-onstratedthat:(a)Creationofoneorseverallargerwet-landsmaybepreferabletomanysmallwetlands;(b)Thegroupdemonstratestheorganiza-tionalandfiscalcapabilitytoactcooperatively;(c)Thegroupdemonstratesthatlong-termmanagementofthecompensationareacanandwillbeprovided;and(d)Thereisaclearpotentialforsuccessoftheproposedcompensationattheidentifiedcom-pensationsite.Conductingcompensationaspartofacooperativeprocessdoesnotreduceoreliminatetherequiredreplacementratiosoutlinedinthisarti-cle.[Ord.3-08§1]18.22.370Waivers.Theadministratormaywaivetherequirementforaspecialreportwhenanapplicantdemonstratesallofthefollowing:(1)Theproposalinvolvedwillnotaffectthecriticalareainamannercontrary'tothegoals,pur-posesandobjectivesofthiscode.(2)Theminimumprotectionstandardsrequiredbythischapteraresatisfied.[Ord.3-08§1]18.22.380Retainingconsultants.JeffersonCountymayretainconsultantstoassistinthereviewofspecialreportsoutsidetherangeofstaffexpertise.Theapplicantshallpayforthecostsofretainingsaidconsultants.[Ord.3-08§II18.22.390Acceptanceofspecialreports.(1)Theadministratorshallverifytheaccuracyandsufficiencyofallspecialreportswithin42cal-endardaysoftheirsubmission.(2)Iftheadministratorfindsthataspecialreportdoesnotaccuratelyreflectsiteconditions,ordoesnotincorporateappropriateprotectionsmech-anisms,theadministratorshallciteevidence(e.g.,soilsamples,welllogdata,etc.)thatdemonstrateswherethespecialreportisinsufficientorinerror.Theapplicantmaytheneitherrevisethespecialreportandsubmitanotherspecialreport,orappealtheadministrativedeterminationpursuanttothiscode.[Ord.3-08§1]ArticleVIII.SpecialReports18.22.400Aquiferrechargeareareport.(1)General.AquiferrechargeareareportsserveastheprimarymeansforJeffersonCountytoverifytheaccuracyofitscriticalaquiferrechargeareamapandtodeterminespecificaquiferprotec-tionmeasurestobeappliedtopreventsignificantadversegroundwaterqualityimpacts.(2)AquiferRechargeAreaReportContent.Aninitialevaluationshallbemadebyaqualifiedgroundwaterscientist/engineer.Theaquiferrechargeareareportshallinclude:18.22.360Generalrequirements.(1)Theadministratormayrequireaspecialreportorreportswhencriticalareasareimpacted.(2)Specialreportsforcriticalareasshallincludeascalemapofthedevelopmentproposalsiteandawrittenreport.(3)Thespecialreportshallidentifyandcharac-terizeanycriticalareaasapartofthelargerdevel-opmentproposalsite,assessimpactsofthedevelopmentproposalonanycriticalareaonor18-114.62(Revised4/08) JeffersonCountyCode18.22.420(a)Adetaileddescriptionoftheproject,includingallprocessesandotheractivitiesthathavethepotentialforcontaminatinggroundwater;hydrogeologicevaluationthatposedlanduses.Theadministratorshallbeauthorizedtocollectfeesnecessarytorecovercostsassociatedwithprocessingandreviewofaquiferrechargeareareports,implementationoftheprotectionstandardscontainedinthischapter,andadministrationofthegeneralprovisionsofthecriticalaquiferrechargeareaprovisionsofthiscode.SuchfeeswillbeincorporatedintotheJeffer-sonCountyfeeschedule.[Ord.3-08§1]18.22.410Drainageanderosioncontrolplan.(1)General.Thisplanshalladdressbestman-agementpracticesthatarephysical,structuralormanagerialpracticesthat,whenusedsinglyorincombination,preventorreducepollutionofwater.(2)QualificationsofthePreparer.Drainageanderosioncontrolplansshallbepreparedbyalicensedprofessionalengineer,exceptforsmallparcelerosioncontrolplans.(3)InformationRequirements.Thedesignstan-dardsandinformationrequirementsforsubmissionofdrainageanderosioncontrolplansshallbeestablishedinaccordancewiththeDepartmentofEcology’sStormwaterManagementManualrentlyadoptedbyJeffersonCounty.[Ord.3-08(b)Aincludes,ataminimum:(i)Adescriptionofthehydrogeologicsettingoftheaquiferregion;(ii)Sitelocation,topography,drainage,andsurfacewaterbodies;(iii)Soilsandgeologicunitsunderlyingthesite;(iv)Groundwatercharacteristicsofthearea,includingflowdirectionandgradient,andexistinggroundwaterquality;(v)Thelocationandcharacteristicsofwellsandspringswithin1,000feetofthesite;(vi)Anevaluationofexistinggroundwa-terrecharge;and(vii)Adiscussionandevaluationofthepotentialimpactoftheproposalupongroundwaterrecharge;(c)Acontaminanttransportanalysisfortheuppermostgroundwatersupplyaquiferassumingaccidentalspillorreleaseofproject-specificcontaminantsoron-sitesewagedischarge,orbothancur-ifapplicable;(d)Adiscussionandevaluationthatdetailsavailableon-sitespillresponseandcontainmentequipment,employeespillresponsetraining,andemergencyservicecoordinationmeasures;(e)Proposedbestmanagementpracticestominimizeexposureofpermeablesurfacestopoten-tialpollutantsandtopreventdegradationofgroundwaterquality;and(f)Requirementsforamonitoringprogramwithfinancialguarantees/assurancesthatthemon-itoringprogramwillbeimplemented.(3)ProfessionalQualifications.Theminimumqualificationsforgroundwaterscientistsandengi-neersperforminggroundwaterandcontaminanttransportevaluationsandpreparingaquiferrechargeareareportsshallbeestablishedpursuanttoacceptableindustrystandardsfortrainingandexperienceandasestablishedbythestateofWash-ingtonintheWashingtonAdministrativeCodeorbystatute.(4)CountyReview.ReportsshallbeforwardedtotheJeffersonCountyenvironmentalhealthdivi-sionfortechnicalreview.Theenvironmentalhealthdivisionshallreviewthereportswithin30daysofreceipttodeterminetheiradequacy.Thecountymayrequestadditionalinformationinordertodeterminetheadequacyofthereports.Theadministratorshalldetermineappropriatecondi-tionsasidentifiedinthereporttomitigatepro-§1]18.22.420Geotechnicalreport.(1)General.Thisreportshallincludeadescrip-tionofthegeologyofthesite,conclusionsandrec-ommendationsregardingtheeffectofgeologicconditionsontheproposal,andopinionsandrec-ommendationsonthesuitabilityofthesitetobedeveloped.(2)QualificationsofthePreparer.Geotechnicalreportsshallbepreparedbyalicensedgeotechnicalengineer,aprofessionalgeologist,oralicensedprofessionalengineerknowledgeableinregionalgeologicconditionswithprofessionalexperienceinlandslide,erosion,orseismichazardevaluation.(3)InformationRequirements.(a)Adescriptionofthegeologicsettingoftheregion,baseduponreadilyavailabledata,including:(i)Sitelocationandtopography;(ii)Soilsandgeologicunitsunderlying(iii)Thelocationandcharacteristicsofspringswithin1,000feetofthesite;and(iv)LevelofhazardinCMZ.(b)Anevaluationofthepotentialimpactoftheproposaluponexistinggeologicalhazards.(c)Adiscussionandevaluationofthepotentialimpactoftheproposaluponexistinggeo-logicalhazards.thesite;18-114.63(Revised4/08) 18.22.430(2)QualificationsofthePreparer.Habitatagementplansshallbepreparedbypersonswhohaveaminimumofabachelor’sdegreeinwildlifeorfisherieshabitatbiology,orarelateddegreeinabiologicalfieldfromanaccreditedcollegeoruni-versitywithaminimumoffouryearsexperienceasapracticingfishorwildlifehabitatbiologist.(3)InformationRequirements.(a)Amap(s)preparedataneasilyreadablescale,includingthefollowinginformation:(i)Thelocationoftheproposeddevelop-mentsite,includingpropertylimits;(ii)Therelationshipofthesitetosur-roundingtopographicandculturalfeatures;(iii)Thenatureanddensityofthepro-poseddevelopmentorlandusechange;(iv)Proposedbuildinglocationsand(d)Recommendationsonappropriatepro-tectionmechanisms,ifnecessary,tominimizetheriskoferosionorlandslide.[Ord.3-08§1]man-18.22.430Gradingplan.(1)General.Thisplanshallidentifythepro-poseddevelopmentprojectincludingthemove-mentofmaterialon-site,alongwiththeproposedandexistingcontoursofthesite,andcross-sectionsthereof.(2)QualificationsofthePreparer.GradingplansshallbepreparedbyalicensedprofessionalengineeroranindividualwithatleastthreeyearsexperienceinthepreparationofgradingplanswhoisknowledgeableofsoilconditionsandgeologyinJeffersonCounty.(3)InformationRequirements.(a)Adescriptionofthegeneralvicinityoftheproposedsite.(b)Thepropertylimitsandaccuratecon-toursofexistinggroundanddetailsofterrainandareadrainage.(c)Limitingdimensions,elevationsoffin-ishcontourstobeachievedbythegrading,andproposeddrainagechannelsandrelatedconstruc-tion.arrangements;and(v)Theboundariesofforestedareas.(b)Alegendthatincludesthefollowinginformation:(i)Acompleteandaccuratelegaldescriptionasprescribedbythetriggeringapplica-tionform(thedescriptionshallincludethetotalacreageoftheparcel);(ii)Title,scaleandnortharrows;(iii)Date,includingrevisiondates,if(d)Detailedplansofallsurfaceandsubsur-facedrainagedevices,walls,cribbing,damsandotherprotectivedevicestobeconstructedwith,orasapartof,theproposedworktogetherwithamapshowingthedrainageareasandtheestimatedrun-offoftheareasservedbyanydrains.(e)Thelocationofanybuildingsorstruc-turesonthepropertywheretheworkistobeper-formedandthelocationofanybuildingsorstructuresonlandofadjacentownersthatarewithin15feetofthepropertyorwhichmaybeaffectedbyproposedgradingoperations.(0Adiscussionandevaluationofthepoten-tialimpactoftheproposedgradingupondesig-natedcriticalareas.(g)Recommendationsonappropriatepro-tectionmechanisms,ifnecessary,topreventdegra-dationofdesignatedcriticalareasandtoensurepublicsafety.[Ord.3-08§1Japplicable;and(iv)Certificatesbyaprofessionalbiolo-gistasappropriate.(c)Areportthatcontainsthefollowinginformation:(i)Adescriptionofthenature,densityandintensityoftheproposeddevelopmentinsuffi-cientdetailtoallowanalysisofsuchlandchangeuponidentifiedfishandwildlifehabitat;(ii)Theapplicant’sanalysisoftheeffectoftheproposeddevelopment,activityorlandusechangeuponthefishorwildlifespeciesidentifiedbytheWashingtonDepartmentofFishandWild-lifewithintheidentifiedpriorityhabitat,utilizingthemanagementguidelines;(iii)Aplanbytheapplicantthatshallexplainhowanyadverseimpactscreatedbythedevelopmentwillbemitigated.(d)Possiblemitigatingmeasuresthatmayinclude,butarenotlimitedto:use18.22.440Habitatmanagementplan.(1)General.Thisreportshallidentifyhowthedevelopmentimpactsoftheproposedprojectwillbemitigated.TheWashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlifePriorityHabitatandSpeciesManage-mentRecommendationsshallbethebasisforthisreport.(i)Establishmentofbufferzones;(ii)Preservationofcriticallyimportantplantsandtrees;(iii)Limitationofaccesstohabitatarea;(iv)Seasonalrestrictionofconstructionactivities;and(v)Establishingatimetableforperiodicreviewoftheplan.[Ord.3-08§1118-114.64(Revised4/08) JeffersonCountyCode18.22.46018.22.450Wetlanddelineationreport.(1)General.Thisreportshallberequiredwhenaproposeddevelopmentencroachesuponadesig-natedwetlandoritsbuffer,andshallbeusedtoidentifytheboundariesandclassificationofthedesignatedwetland.(2)QualificationsofthePreparer.Wetlanddelineationreportsshallbepreparedbyabiologistwithwetlandsexpertise,aprofessionalwetlandscientistcertifiedbytheSocietyofWetlandScien-tists.regulatedwetlandincluding:vegetationcommuni-tiesclassifiedpertheU.S.FishandWildlifeSer-viceClassificationofDeepwaterHabitats(1979);speciescompositionofvegetationcommunities,includingpresenceandpercentcover;existingsoils;andexistinghydrologicconditionsincludinginflow/outflow,sourceofwaterwithinthesystem,relativewaterquality,andseasonalchangesinhydrology,ifapplicable;(vii)Adetailedanalysisofwildlifeciesuseofthewetlandanditsbuffer;(viii)Adetailedanalysisoftheexistingwetlandbufferincludingspeciescompositionandpercentcoverage,whetherthebufferisdisturbedornot,andthefunctionalvalueofthebufferinrelationtotheregulatedwetland;(ix)Ifthedevelopmentactivitywouldeliminateallorpartofaregulatedwetlandthenadetailedcompensatorymitigationplanasoutlinedinsubsection(4)ofthissectionmustbeprovided.(4)MitigationPlanContents.Allwetlandtoration,creation,andenhancementprojectsrequiredbythiscode,eitherasaconditionofprojectapprovalorastheresultofanenforcementaction,shallfollowamitigationplanpreparedbyaqualifiedspecialistasdefinedhereinandductedinaccordancewiththedescribedinthiscode.Theapplicantorviolatormustreceivewrittenapprovalofthemitigationplanbytheadministratorpriortocommencementofanywetlandrestoration,creation,orenhance-mentactivity.[Ord.3-08§1]ArticleIX.AlternativeProtectionStandards-CriticalAreaStewardshipPlans(CASPs)18.22.460Criticalareastewardshipplans(CASPs)-Generally.Propertyownersmayelecttodevelopsite-spe-cificcriticalareastewardshipplans(CASPs)alternativetotheprescriptiverequirementsofArti-clesVI(FishandWildlifeHabitatConservationAreas(FWHCAs))throughVII(Wetlands)ofthischapter.Ataminimum,theCASPmustprovideequalorgreaterprotectionofcriticalareafunctionsandvaluesthantheprescriptivestandardsofbuff-ersandsetbacks.Thepropertyownershallberesponsiblefordevelopingtheseplansinconsulta-tionwithaqualifiedprofessionalmeetingtheapplicablerequirementsofArticleVIIIofthischapter.Whenavailable,qualifiedJeffersonCountystaffmayassistlandownerswiththesesub-missions.Theadministratorshallberesponsibleforreviewingandapprovingsubmittedplans.Theadministratormay,athis/herdiscretion,seektech-spe-(3)InformationRequirements.(a)Amap(s)preparedataneasilyreadablescale,includingthefollowinginformation:(i)Wetlandboundaries;(ii)Samplesiteandsampletransects;(iii)Boundariesofforestedareas;and(iv)Boundariesofwetlandclassesifmultipleclassesexist.(b)Alegendthatincludesthefollowinginformation:res-(i)Acompleteandaccuratelegaldescriptionasprescribedbythetriggeringapplica-tionform(thedescriptionshallincludethetotalacreageoftheparcel);(ii)Title,scaleandnortharrows;(iii)Date,includingrevisiondates,ifcon-requirementsapplicable;and(iv)Certificatesbyaprofessionalbiolo-gistasappropriate.(c)Areportthatcontainsthefollowinginformation:(i)Adiscussionofthedelineationmeth-odsandresults,withspecialemphasisontechniqueusedfromtheWashingtonStateWetlandsIdentifi-cationandDelineationManual,March1997,orasamendedhereafter;(ii)Adescriptionofrelevantsiteinfor-mationacquiredfromtheNationalWetlandInven-torymapsandtheSoilSurveyforJeffersonCounty;asan(iii)Theacreageofeachwetlandonthesite,basedonthesurvey,iftheacreagewillimpactthebuffersizedeterminationortheprojectdesign;(iv)Allcompletedfielddatasheetsnum-beredtocorrespondtoeachsamplesite;(v)Projectcross-sections,bothbeforeandaftercompletion,inrelationtothesurfaceele-vationofthewetlandmustbeindicatedforpro-posedactivitiesthatinvolvecuttingorfillingoperationswithinthewetlandoritsproposedbuffer;(vi)Classificationofthewetlandinaccordancewiththestandardsadoptedinthischap-terandadetailedwrittenanalysisoftheexisting18-114.65(Revised4/08) 18.22.461standards(Chapters173-201Aand173-204WAC)willbedeterminedbyJeffersonCounty’swater-shedmonitoringprogramdescribedinArticleXofthischapter.(2)TheCASPshallincludeprotocolsfornicalassistancefromtheJeffersonCountyconser-vationdistrict,WashingtonDepartmentofFishandWildlifeortheWashingtonDepartmentofEcologywhenreviewingCASPsforapproval.(Ord.3-08§1]18.22.461Applicabilityandlimitations.Thefollowingprovisionsdefinetheapplicabil-ityandlimitationsoftheCASP:(1)CASPsapplytoonlyresidentialdevelop-ment,relatedactivitiesandappurtenances,includ-ingaccessorydwellingunits(ADUs).Theymaybeusedinruralvillagecenters(RVCs)butarenottobeusedinurbangrowthareas(UGAs).Theyarenottobeusedforcommercialorindustrialusesordevelopments,asidentifiedanddefinedinChapter18.10JCC.(2)Theycanbeappliedtopropertiesone-quar-teracreorlarger.(3)CASPsareonlyapplicabletofishandwild-lifehabitatconservationareas(ArticleVI)orwet-lands(ArticleVII).(4)CASPsmustprovideequalorgreaterpro-tectionofcriticalareafunctionsandvaluesthantheprescriptivestandardsofbuffersandsetbacks.(5)TheymaybeappliedwithinCategoryII,IIIandIVwetlandsandbuffers,andwithinbuffersofCategoryIwetlands.TheycannotbeusedinCate-goryIwetlands.(6)CASPsmaynotbeusedforactivitiesinvolvingrillforbuildingwithinwetlandsandFWHCAsbutmaybeusedforfillorvegetationmanagementwithinthesecriticalareasifitisforenhancementoftheirfunctions.(7)CASPswillbeadministeredasaTypeIper-mit,perChapter18.40JCC.(8)ACASPmaybepreparedbyanyperson,butitisstronglyadvisedthataqualifiedprofes-sionalbeatleastconsulted.[Ord.3-08§1]mon-itoringtheseperformancestandardstoincludesamplingandanalyticalmethods;timingofthesampling;anddeterminationofthestatisticalpro-ceduresusedtodefinesignificantdeparturesfromtheperformancestandards.Performancestandardsshouldcontainthefollowingcomponents:(a)Indicator.Theyidentifywhatwillbemonitored,suchaswoodyvegetation,invasivespecies(e.g.,reedcanarygrass(Phalarisirundina-cea),wetlandarea,orwaterregimes).(b)Attributes.Theyidentifywhataspectoftheindicatorwillbemonitored,suchaspercentcoverofvegetation,densityofstemsofsurvivingvegetation,sizeofthewetlandbufferarea,orper-centofaninundatedarea.(c)Actions.Theyidentifythedegreeofcompliance,suchas“willnotexceedXpercentcoverofinvasivespecies,"or“willestablishXacresofwetlandarea,”orwill“prescribearequiredsurvivalofplantedvegetation.”(d)Quantities/Status.Theyidentifytheamountofchangeorthedesiredleveltheattributeshouldreach,suchasachievingXpercenttotalaerialcoveroftreesandshrubs,orestablishingXacresofwetlandbuffer.(e)TimeFrame.Theyidentifywhenthestandardshouldbeachieved.Forexample,“havingXareainundatedattheendofJulyeachyear”or“achievingXpercenttotalaerialcoveroftreesandshrubsbyyearY.”Performancestandardsshouldbeappropriateforthemonitoringperiod.[Ord.3-08§1]18.22.470CASPcontents-Existingconditions.Criticalareastewardshipplans(CASPs)shallincludethefollowingelements:(1)AsiteplanoftheentireparcelidentifyingthecriticalareabeingprotectedbytheCASP.(2)Whenwetlandsarepresentontheproperty,awetlanddelineationreportshallbecompletedinaccordancewithJCC18.22.450.ThemostcurrenteditionofWashingtonStateWetlandRatingSys-temforWesternWashingtonshallbeusedinpre-paringthereport.Thereportshalldetailthescoresdeterminedforhydrologic,waterqualityandhabi-tatfunctions,andshallensurethemostpertinentscoreisaccordedthegreatestweightinratingthewetland.Theratingsformsandsupplementalinformationrequiredforcompletingthoseformsshallbeincludedinthereport.Theprescriptive18.22.465Performancestandards.Criticalareastewardshipplans(CASPs)shallidentifyspecificperformancestandardsfocusedonmaintainingorenhancingthefunctionsandvaluesofthecriticalarea(s).(1)Performancestandardswillvaryfromoneplantoanotherdependingonthecriticalareabeingprotectedandthepotentialhazardsassociatedwiththeproposeddevelopment.Chosenperformancestandardsshouldbequantifiablesothattheycanbemeasured.Theymayincludemaintenanceofawetland’shydrauliccapacity,percentgroundcoverinrevegetatedareas,controlofinvasiveplants,sur-vivalofshrubsandtrees,etc.CompliancewithWashingtonStatewaterand/orsedimentqualityIS-114.66(Revised4/08) JeffersonCountyCode18.22.480wetlandbuffersappropriatetothewetlandclassandproposedactivitydefinedinJCC18.22.330shallbereviewed.(3)Surfacewatersandwetlandsshallbesur-veyedforaccuratestreamtypingand/orwetlandratingbyaqualifiedprofessional,consistentwithstatelaw.(4)HabitatsoflocalimportancedocumentedbyJeffersonCountyonandwithinthree-tenthsofonemileofthepropertyshallbedocumented.(5)Presenceofanyothercriticalareas.(6)Adescriptionofthepropertyandadjacentwatershedtoinclude:(a)Acontourmapdescribinglandeleva-tionswithinthree-tenthsofonemileoftheprop-erty.(11)Thissectionshouldbesupportedbyphotodocumentation.[Ord.3-08§1]18.22.480Descriptionofthemanagementproposal.Theoverallgoalofthecriticalareastewardshipplan(CASP)istomaintainorenhancetheexistingfunctionsandvaluesoftheassociatedwatershedwhileaddressingtheneedsanddesiresoftheprop-ertyowner.Theproposedplanshouldbedescribedindetailtoincludethefollowing:(1)Aclearstatementofthegoals,objectives,andperformancestandardsoftheplanandhowimplementationofthisplanwillprotectthefunc-tionsandvalues.Thissectionshallalsodescribethegoalsofthepropertyowner,includingpro-posedmultipleusesofthecriticalareaand/ortheareaswithinthebuffersdefinedinJCC18.22.270and18.22.330.(2)TheCASPshallbesupportedwiththesitemapdescribedinJCC18.22.470(1)overlaidwiththefollowinginformation:(a)Thelocationofthedevelopmentactivi-tiesproposedatthesite;(b)Finalcontourswhengradingwithinthecriticalareaoritsbufferisproposed;(c)Existingvegetationinthecriticalareaoritsbufferthatistobepreserved;(d)Invasiveand/ornoxiousvegetationthatistobecontrolledoreradicatedincludingcontrolmethods;(e)Speciesandgenerallocationofnewveg-etationtobeplanted;(f)LocationofallstructurestobeplacedwithinacriticalareaandthebuffersprescribedinJCC18.22.270and18.22.330.(3)Theproposedbuffersshallbedescribedwithanemphasisonhowtheywillprotectthecrit-icalarea’sfunctionsandvaluesfrombeingdegraded.Thissectionofthereportshouldbesup-portedbyreferencetopublishedliteratureorwellreasonedrationalesprovidedbytheprofessionalpreparingthereport.(4)Arationaleforthefinalcontourswhengradingisinvolvedwithadescriptionofhowthechangeswillhelpimplementthegoalsoftheplan.(5)Adetailedplandescribingthemaintenanceofexistingvegetationand/orre-vegetationofthesite.Fortreesandshrubs,thisplanshoulddescribethedensity(spacing)ofindividualspeciesaswellastheirlocationinthelandscape.Arationaleforthevegetationmaintenanceand/orrevegetationplanshallbeprovidedtoincludeadescriptionofhowtheplantswillfunctiontomeetthegoalsof(b)Documentedorobservedpresenceofthreatenedorendangeredspecies.(c)Aqualitativeassessmentoftheprop-erty’shydrologytoincludeevidenceofprolongedfloodingorponding,knownsignificantaquiferrechargeareas,observedsurfacewaterdrainagepatternsandstreamflows.(7)Aqualitativeassessmentofsurfacewaterstoincludestreamand/orpondsubstratetypes,pres-enceoflargewoodydebrisandrifflesandpools,potentialfishspawningareas,observedfishandaquaticinvertebrates,etc.(8)AqualitativeassessmentoftheexistinglandscapelocatedwithintheprescriptivebuffersdefinedinJCC18.22.330forwetlandsandJCC18.22.270forsurfacewatersshallinclude:(a)Thepresenceofinvasiveand/orexoticplantspeciesandthepresenceandconditionofalllayersofvegetation.Thespeciescompositionandgeneralageandconditionofexistingforestswithinthisareashouldbedocumented.Thissectionshouldbesupportedwithphotodocumentation;(b)Evidenceofhistoricorexistingandongoingagriculturaland/orforestryactivities;(c)Adeterminationofthelandscapeslopesadjacenttosurfacewaterstoincludeaqualitativeassessmentofsoiltexturesandstabilitytogetherwithanassessmentofthevalueofexistingvegeta-tionforstabilizingsoils.(9)Adescriptionofexistinghumandistur-banceswithinthecriticalareatoincluderoads,bridges,bulkheads,hydrologicmodificationtoincludepre-existing(i.e.,grandfathered)farmponds,excavatedditches,draintilelinesandotherstructures.Thelocationofthesefeaturesshouldbeannotatedonthesitemap.(10)Adescriptionofhowtheproposeddevel-opmentmightadverselyaffectthecriticalarea’sfunctionsandvalues.18-114.67(Revised4/08) 18.22.49018.22.520Periodicmonitoring.Criticalareastewardshipplans(CASPs)shallbemonitoredandreportssubmittedasprescribedbytheapprovingauthorities’implementationpro-gram.Monitoringreportsshallbesubmittedtothedepartmentofcommunitydevelopment,andshallincludethefollowing:(1)Identificationofthegoals,objectivesandperformancestandardsoftheCASPincludingthespecificperformancestandardsadoptedpursuanttoICC18.22.465;(2)AqualitativecomparisonofthecriticalareafunctionsandvaluespresentatthetimeofannualmonitoringwithconditionsexistingduringationoftheCASPandconditionsobservedduringpreviousannualreports;(3)Adiscussionofreal-timeobservationdescribingcompliancewiththeperformancestan-dardsdescribedinJCC18.22.465;(4)WhenanalysisofmonitoringresultsdescribesadeficiencyinmeetingtheCASP’sgoals,adaptivemanagementshallbeemployedtorectifythedeficiency;(5)ThelandowneragreestoallowapprovedJeffersonCountystaffaccesstopropertyforthepurposesofmonitoring;(6)Monitoringperiodsmaybeextendedwhennecessary,asdeterminedbytheadministrator.[Ord.3-08§1)themanagementplanandofthepropertyowner.Thisplanshouldinclude:(a)Atabledescribingthenumbersandtypesofplantstobeintroduced;(b)Adescriptionofhowthevariousvegeta-tionlayerswillfunctiontoprotectwaterquality,thecriticalarea’shydrology,andthehabitatneedsofwildlifeknowntoexistinthearea;(c)Plantingdensity(spacing)byspecies;(d)Aplantingschedulewithreferencetolocalrainfallpatternsandadditionalwateringrequirementsandmethods;(e)Short-termprotectionmethodssuchasprotectivetubes,socks,controlofothervegetationthatmightout-competetheplantedstock,mulch-ingrequirements,etc.(6)Aproposedorapprovedstormwaterman-agementplanasapplicableperJCC18.30.060through18.30.070shallbeattachedasanappen-dix.cre-(7)Thetimingofproposedplanimplementa-tion,withanemphasisonhowtheanticipatedtim-ingwillminimizedisturbancetothecriticalareaandeliminatepotentialeffectstoadjoiningproper-tiesand/orwildlifeoflocalconcern.(8)Alistoftheadditionallocal,stateandfed-eralpermitsthatwillberequiredforimplementingtheCASP.[Ord.3-08§1]18.22.490Maintenance.Somecriticalareastewardshipplans(CASPs)mayrequireperiodicmaintenanceactivities.Theseplansshallincludeamaintenancescheduledetail-ingtheseactivities.Ingeneral,plansthatdonotrequirelong-termmaintenancearepreferredtoplansthatrequireperiodicmaintenancetobeveri-fiedbycountystaff.[Ord.3-08§1]18.22.510As-builtplanrequirement.Aninitialas-builtplanshallbepreparedbyaqualifiedprofessionaljudgedcompetentbyJeffer-Countydescribingtheactiontakentoimple-mentthecriticalareastewardshipplan(CASP).Thisreportshallinclude:(1)Acontourmapdescribingfinalcontoursifgradingisrequired;(2)Aquantitativedescriptionofthevegetationplanted;(3)Establishmentoftwoormorepermanentphotodocumentationstationswithestablishedbearingsandmonumentstoensurethatsubsequentphotographsdepictthesamelandscapeforcom-parativepurposes;(4)Additionalphotographicdocumentationisencouraged.[Ord.3-08§II18.22.530Contingencyplanning.Acontingencyplanisrequireddescribinghowthecriticalareastewardshipplan(CASP)mightbemodifiedifmonitoringindicatesafailuretomeetthestatedgoals,oraneedtomodifythegoalsbecauseofeventsoutsidethelandowner’scontrol(e.g.,damageassociatedwithawildlife).Forinstance,ifoneoftheplantedspeciesofvegetationprovesilladaptedtotheenvironmentandfailstosurviveorthrivetotheextentneededtoprovidetheintendedfunctionthenalternativespeciesshouldbeidentified.Ingeneral,plansshouldinitiallyplantatgreaterthan120percentofthespecifiedfinaldensityofshrubsandtrees.Thecontingencyplanshouldcallforeithersupplementalplantingwhenthedensityfallsbelowtheprescribedfinaldensityoritcouldcallfortheplantingofalternatespecie(s).[Ord.3-08§1]18.22.540Failuretosubmitrequiredreports.Failuretosubmitareportrequiredunderthisarticleshallconstituteafailuretocomplywiththetermsofthepermit,andshallbeprocessedbytheadministratorpursuanttoChapter18.50JCC,Enforcement.[Ord.3-08§1]son18-114.68(Revised4/08) JeffersonCountyCode18.22.63018.22.550Waiver.Theadministratormaywaiveportionsofacriti-calareastewardshipplan(CASP)if,inhis/heropinion,criticalareafunctionsandvalueswillnotbeadverselyaffectedbyaproposedactivity.AnapprovedCASPmustberecordedonthepropertydeed(recordedwiththeJeffersonCountyauditor)andmustremainineffectunlessreplacedbyaneworupdatedCASPapprovedbythecounty.[Ord.3-08§1]18.22.610Staticbufferwidthsforvoluntarilyenhancedcriticalareas.Forpurposesofdeterminingrequiredbufferwidths,wetlandsandorriparianareasthatintentionallyenhanced,wheresuchenhancementisnotpartofarequiredmitigationplan,willretaintheprescriptivebufferrequirementsdeterminedpriortotheenhancementactivity.Additionalfuturerestrictionswillnotbeplacedonwetlandsassociatedwiththeirincreasedfunctionsandval-uescausedbyvoluntaryenhancement.[Ord.3-08areArticleX.ImplementationStrategies§1]18.22.570Conservationfutures.JeffersonCountythroughtheconservationfuturesfund(OrdinanceNo.06-0708-02,Chapter3.08JCC)mayuseconservationfuturesfundstocompensateaffectedpropertyownersfortheircostsinprotectingfishandwildlifethroughthepurchaseofconservationeasements.[Ord.3-0818.22.620Publicbenefitratingsystem.Buffersthatarededicatedaspermanentopenspacetractswillqualifyforthemaximumnumberofpointsunderthepublicbenefitratingsystem.Qualifyingapplicantswillbeofferedtheopportu-nitytoenrollintheJeffersonCountyopenspacetaxprogramatnocost.[Ord.3-08§1]§1]18.22.630Residentialbestmanagementpractices(BMPs).Thefollowingbestmanagementpractices(BMPs)willbeencouragedbyJeffersonCountyforallexistingandfutureresidentialdevelopmentadjacenttocriticalareas.Permitsmaybecondi-tionedtorequiretheseBMPswhenutilizingbufferaveragingorotheradministrativelyavailablemeansofbufferreduction.(1)StormwaterManagement.(a)Filterrunofffromimpervioussurfacesthroughappropriatevegetationsuchaslawnsorbiofiltrationswalespriortoenteringwetlandsorwetlandbuffers.(b)Directgutterdownspoutsintoeitherbio-filtrationswalesorgravel-linedpitstosequesterbacteriaandatmosphericallydepositedcontami-nants.18.22.580Education.JeffersonCountyencouragesgoodstewardshiponitslandtoprovidebenefitstofishandwildlife.Thecountywillseekfundstoprovidegeneralresourceeducationandsite-specificassistancetohelplandownersunderstandwhyitisimportanttoimprovetheirmanagementpracticesandtoshowthemhowtoimprovethosepracticesinawaythatbenefitsboththelandownerandnaturalresources.Thecountybelievesthatthesearewin-wingoalskeytomaintainingandenhancingnaturalresources.[Ord.3-08§1]18.22.590Bestmanagementpractices(BMPs).Asageneralpractice,JeffersonCountyencour-agesandsupportstheuseofbestmanagementpracticesbyalllandownersinanefforttoenhancethecounty’snaturalresources.FarmBMPshavebeendevelopedoverthelastfivedecadesbytheUSDAandJeffersonCounty’sconservationdis-trict.ResidentialBMPs(JCC18.22.630)arepro-motedforalllandownersinJeffersonCounty,whetherengagedinagricultureornot.[Ord.3-08(c)Storepetroleum,fertilizerandpesticidecontainersundercoverandawayfromwatersourcesandcriticalareasuntilproperlydisposed.(d)Applyonlytheamountofirrigationwaterthatcanbeabsorbedintothegroundtoland-scapes.Avoidexcessivewaterresultinginsurfaceflowsintowetlandorwetlandbuffers.(e)Avoidtheuseofchlorinatedwaterforlandscapeuse.(f)Avoidusingsaltonimpervioussurfacessuchaswalksanddrivewaysduringfreezingweather.§1 118.22.600Costsharingincentives.JeffersonCountywillassistandencourageland-ownerstoparticipateinprivate,stateandfederallyfundedresourceenhancementprojects.Inaddition,JeffersonCountywillseekoutsidesourcesofgrantfundstoincreasetheresourcesavailableforresourcestewardshipprograms.[Ord.3-08§1](g)Ensurethatalloutsideburningiscon-(h)Avoidmotorizedvehicleincursionsintothewetlandand/orwetlandbuffer.trolled.18-114.69(Revised4/0Q) 18.22.640tocomplementexistingeffortstoassessihefollow-ingendpoints:(a)Temperature;(b)Dissolvedoxygen;(c)pH;(d)Fecalandtotalcoliform;(e)Totalsuspendedsolids;(0Totalvolatilesolids;and(g)Nutrients,toincludeNH4+,KH3,N03(2)ManagementofHouseholdContaminantsandYardWaste.(a)Maintainallgarbageandlitterinenclosedcontainersthatexcludewildlife.(b)Donotusepoisonstocontrolmoles,rodentsorotherpestsnearwetlands.(c)StrictlyadheretolabelrestrictionswhenusingEPAapprovedpesticides.(d)Donotdisposeofyardwaste(grassclip-pings,trimmings,etc.)oranyotherwasteinwet-landsorwetlandbuffers.(e)Donotmaintainvehiclesorequipmentinareaswherecontaminantswillwashdirectlyintowetlandbuffers.Maintenanceareasshouldincludefilterswalesorgrassyareasofsufficientwidthtointerceptsurfaceflowsintocriticalareasortheirbuffers.andP04.(4)MonitoringofallappropriateTyjeSandFstreamswillbeaccomplishedneartheirentryintothemarineenvironment.Additionalmonitoringwillbeaccomplishedduringthefirstoreinchofraininthefallofeachyearandduringtheperiodofanticipatedlowestflowinlatesummer(AugustorSeptember).(5)JeffersonCountywillencouragebiologicalmonitoringusingrapidbio-assessmentproceduresofthehealthofitswatershedsbyvoluntarypro-gramssuchaswaterwatchers.(6)Threesampleswillbecollectedateachestablishedsamplingsite.Wheresamplingindi-catesasignificantexceedanceofWashingtonStatewaterqualitycriteria(usingappropriatestatisticalanalyses)and/oranexceedanceofexistingbase-linedata,JeffersonCountywillnotify(asappropri-ate)theWashingtonStateDepartmentofHealthandtheDepartmentofEcologyrequestingassis-tanceindeterminingthecauseoftheexceedance.(7)JeffersonCountywillworkcooperativelywithlandownerscontributingtotheexceedancetocorrecttheproblem.Ifpropertyownersdonotcooperate,oriftheexceedancepersistsdespiteattemptsatadaptivemanagement,thenJeffersonCountywilltakewhateverlegalorregulatorystepsarenecessarytocorrectthesituation.Thosestepsmayincludelegalactionoranincreaseinthebufferwidthsinstreamsegmentscausingtheexceedances.[Ord.3-08§1](f)Storeallpotentialcontaminants,includ-ingpetroleumproducts,pesticides,cleaners,etc.,undercoverandproperlydisposeofemptycon-tainers.(3)LandscapeManagement.(a)Donotplantinvasiveornamentalplantsinoradjacenttoanycriticalareabuffers.(b)Retain,wherepossible,largetreesthatshadewetlandareas-eventhoughtheymaygrowoutsidetherequiredbuffer.(c)Leavepermeablesurfacesonasmuchofthelandscapeaspossible.(d)Attempttoincorporatelargewoodydebrisintothelandscapeplanasabenefittowild-life.(e)Shieldoutsidelightssothattheydonotshinedirectlyintonearbywetlands.[Ord.3-08§11ArticleXLWatershedMonitoring18.22.640Watershedmonitoring.JeffersonCountyshalldevelopandimplementacountywidemonitoringplandesignedtogiveearlynotificationofdegradingwaterqualityandtodoc-umentimprovingwaterqualityasaresultofanincreasedemphasisonvoluntarylandownerstew-ardship.Thiseffortwillincludethefollowing:(1)Thecountywillinitiatethisprocessbycon-ductinganinventoryofallcurrentmonitoringactivitiesconductedbylocal,stateandfederalagenciesandprivategroupssuchasstreamkeepersandwaterwatchers.(2)ThecountywillassistwithcompilationofallofthemarineandfreshwaterdataapplicabletoJeffersonCountyinasingledatabasetoestablishabaselinedataset.(3)Whentheinventorydescribedaboveiscomplete,amonitoringprogramwillbedesignedArticleXII.AdaptiveManagement18.22.650Adaptivemanagement.Adaptivemanagementreliesonscientificmeth-odstoevaluatehowwellregulatoryandnonregu-latoryactionsachievetheirobjectivesandmakesadjustmentstothoseprograms.Management,pol-icy,andregulatoryactionsaretreatedasexperi-mentsthatarepurposefullymonitoredandevaluatedtodeterminewhethertheyareeffectiveand,ifnot,howtheyshouldbeimprovedtoincreasetheireffectiveness.Anadaptivemanage-mentprogramisaformalanddeliberatescientificapproachtotakingactionandobtaininginforma-18-114.70(Revised4/08) JeffersonCountyCode18.22.650tioninthefaceofuncertainty.Toeffectivelyimplementanadaptivemanagementprogram,Jef-fersonCounty,insupportofitsCAOwill:(1)Addressfundingfortheresearchcompo-nentoftheadaptivemanagementprogram;(2)Changecoursebasedontheresultsandinterpretationofnewinformationthatresolvesuncertainties;and(3)Committotheappropriatetimeframeandscalenecessarytoreliablyevaluateregulatoryandnonregulatoryactionsaffectingcriticalareaspro-tectionandanadromousfisheries.[Ord.3-08§1]18-114.71(Revised4/08) Cc } cl COUNTY OF JEFFERSON STATE OF WASHINGTON An Ordinance Repealing and Replacing } Chapter 18.22 of the Jefferson County } Code, known as the Critical Areas } ORDINANCE NO. 05-0310-20 Ordinance, and Amending Chapter } 18.10, Chapter 18.20 and Section } 18.30.180 WHEREAS, Jefferson County is required under the Growth Management Act ("GMA") codified as Chapter 36.70A RCW and under the Chapter 18.45 of the Jefferson County Code ("JCC") to conduct a periodic review and update of its Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations to ensure consistency with updated state laws and regulations, population and employment projections, and county policy decisions and adopts the following procedural and legislative findings: WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.170 and RCW 36.70A.172 requires Jefferson County to designate critical areas, including the best available science in developing policies and development regulations to protect the functions and values of critical areas; and, WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.130 requires Jefferson County to continually review, evaluate, and periodically update its development regulations, including critical areas regulations; and, WHEREAS, on December 10, 2018, the Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners ("BoCC") completed its periodic review and update of the Comprehensive Plan and its development regulations, deferring completion of the periodic review and update of the Critical Areas Ordinance ("CAO"), and declaring additional goals and policies that emphasized economic development, affordable housing and residential development while protecting the environmental quality of the county's unincorporated areas; and, WHEREAS, on March 25, 2019, the BoCC and Board of Health passed a joint resolution establishing a program of regulatory reform directing County departments to accomplish reform goals, such as streamlining and simplifying the Jefferson County Code, including updates to the CAO, while ensuring early and continuous public participation and engagement and ensuring protection of the county's environment and public health; and, WHEREAS, on July 8, 2019, the BoCC passed a resolution establishing a Critical Areas Regulatory Reform Task Force ("Task Force") and appointing its members representing broad and diverse public, private and local civic skill sets that relate to the CAO update effort so that the Task Force contribute to continuous public participation and citizen involvement and holistically analyze and recommend to the Planning Commission and the Department of Community Development regulations that protect the environment and create efficient development practices and permitting paths; and, 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 1 of 108 WHEREAS, the Task Force met from August 8, 2019 until November 14, 2019, providing their advice and recommendations to the Planning Commission on December 4, 2019. WHEREAS, on December 2, 2019, the BoCC referred the CAO to the Planning Commission, including the recommendations of the Task Force which were presented to the Planning Commission during their regular meeting December 4, 2019; and, WHEREAS, the CAO is supported by a record of best available science; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the draft CAO prepared by County Staff and Task Force recommendations and after timely notice held a public hearing on January 22, 2020; and, WHEREAS, after receipt of written and oral comments, the Planning Commission deliberated on the draft CAO making changes to the County staff recommended CAO and on February 3, 2020, and suggesting necessary amendments to Chapter 18.10 JCC Definitions) and Chapter 18.20 JCC (Performance and Use Specific Standards) the Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend the draft CAO for BoCC consideration; and, WHEREAS, on February 3, 2020, the BoCC considered the Planning Commission's recommendation and, after applying the required growth factors, the BoCC decided to modify the Planning Commission recommendations; WHEREAS, the BoCC, after timely notice, held a public hearing on March 2, 2020 receiving written and oral comments; and, WHEREAS, the BoCC deliberated over the draft CAO, providing substantive feedback, which resulted in changes to the CAO which are consistent with the State Environmental Policy Act ("SEPA") review and the best available science record; and, WHEREAS, the BoCC made additional changes to the Planning Commission's draft CAO during their deliberations, including to amend JCC 18.30.180; WHEREAS, the entire package of regulations adopted by the BoCC, the replacement Chapter 22 JCC, and the amendments to Chapter 18.10 JCC, Chapter 18.20 JCC, and JCC 18.30180 are contained in Appendix A attached to this Ordinance; WHEREAS, the periodic review and update of the CAO were included in a SEPA review through a staff issued Addendum to the 1998 Draft and Final Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Environmental Impact Statements ("EIS") and subsequent Supplemental EISs, and a SEPA Checklist and Addenda that addressed potential revisions to the proposed Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code updates; and, 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 2 of 108 WHEREAS, the BoCC finds that the periodic review and update of the CAO and the amendments to Chapter 18.10 JCC, Chapter 18.20 JCC and 18.30.180 JCC reflected in Appendix A serve to benefit the health, welfare, safety, and lifestyle of the residents of Jefferson County; and, WHEREAS, the BoCC finds that the periodic review and update of the CAO and the amendments to Chapter 18.10 JCC, Chapter 18.20 JCC and 18.30.180 JCC reflected in Appendix A are consistent with county-wide planning policies and consistent with the comprehensive plans of other counties and cities with which Jefferson County has common border or regional issues; and, WHEREAS, the BoCC finds that the periodic review and update of the CAO and the amendments to Chapter 18.10 JCC, Chapter 18.20 JCC and 18.30.180 JCC reflected in Appendix A satisfy GMA requirements and JCC requirement for a periodic review and update; and, WHEREAS, the BoCC must evaluate the CAO periodic review and update it using the criteria set forth in JCC 18.45.080(2)(c); and, WHEREAS, the BoCC makes the following additional findings, based on the full and complete record, pursuant to the JCC 18.45.080(2)(c): i) Have circumstances related to the proposed amendment and/or the area in which it is located substantially changed since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan? The circumstances related to the proposal and/or area have no substantially changes since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan's Periodic Review and Update was completed in December 2018; however, the CAO periodic review and update was postponed. This proposal brings the CAO development regulations in alignment with the 2018 Comprehensive Plan. ii)Are the assumptions upon which the(2004]Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan is based no longer valid; or is new information available, which was not considered during the adoption process or any annual amendments to the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan? New information is available which was not considered during the most recent periodic review and update of the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, additional best available science and public engagement have resulted in new information which informs this proposal. iii) Does the proposed amendment reflect current, widely held values of the residents of Jefferson County? 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 3 of 108 The proposal reflects currently widely held values. The proposed CAO meets requirements of the Comprehensive Plan, representing resident input in the Comprehensive Plan Periodic Review and Update completed in 2018. See for example the following Framework Goal: Framework Goal VI Environmental Conservation: Foster environmental stewardship, preserve clean air and water, and protect fish and wildlife habitat. Anticipate and respond to climate change with mitigation and adaptation strategies. Further, a robust public participation process included a diverse group of appointed stakeholders, including the Critical Areas Ordinance Regulatory Reform Task Force, which met and delivered recommendations on the CAO to the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission finds that the proposal reflects currently widely held values. iv) Is growth and development as envisioned in the 2018 Comprehensive Plan occurring faster or slower than anticipated, or is it failing to materialize? There is not sufficient information since the December 2018 adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan to assess whether growth or development as envisioned is occurring faster to slower than anticipated. v) Has the capacity of the county to provide adequate services diminished or increased? The capacity of the County to provide adequate services has not diminished or increased relating to this proposal. vi) Is there sufficient urban land, as designated and zoned to meet projected demand and need? There is sufficient urban land as designated and zoned to meet projected demand and need. vii) Are any of these assumptions under which the plan is based no longer found to be valid? All assumptions in the Comprehensive Plan are still valid. viii) Are there changes in the county-wide attitudes? Do they necessitate amendments to the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and the basic values embodied within the Comprehensive Plan Vision Statement? The county-wide attitudes remain strongly aligned with those embodied in the Comprehensive Plan Vision Statement. The proposal does not necessitate amendments to the goals or basic values embodied within the Comprehensive Plan 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 4 of 108 Vision State and the proposal brings the development regulations into better conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. ix) Are there changes in circumstances which dictate a need for amendment to the Comprehensive Plan? The circumstances related to the proposal and/or area have not substantially changed since the adoption of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan's Periodic Review and Update was completed in December 2018; however, the CAO periodic review and update was postponed. This proposal brings the CAO development regulations in alignment with the 2018 Comprehensive Plan. x) Do inconsistencies exist between the Comprehensive Plan and the GMA or the Comprehensive Plan and countywide planning policies for Jefferson County? There are no inconsistencies between the Comprehensive Plan, GMA, and County- wide Planning Policies for Jefferson County. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED, by the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners as follows: Section 1. Findings. The BoCC hereby adopts the recitals (the WHEREAS statements) as its findings of fact in support of this Ordinance. Section 2. Chapter 18.22 JCC Repealed and Replaced. Chapter 18.22 JCC and Ordinance No. 03-0317-08 creating 18.22 JCC, a Critical Areas Ordinance is hereby repealed and replaced with Chapter 22 JCC as reflected in Appendix A. The repealing of the Chapter 18.22 JCC and the ordinances adopting and amending the Critical Areas Ordinance does not repeal or affect any vested rights established by the ordinance. Section 3. Chapter 18.10 JCC, Chapter 18.20 JCC and JCC 18.30.180 Amended. Chapter 18.10 JCC, Chapter 18.20 JCC and JCC 18.30.180 are hereby amended as reflected in Appendix A. Section 4. 2018 Comprehensive Plan Adopted. The Critical Areas Ordinance, as set forth in Appendix A and MLA14-00086/ZON16-00027, is incorporated by reference and adopted as the Jefferson County Critical Areas Ordinance, Chapter 18.22 JCC. The Critical Areas Ordinance shall be transmitted to the Washington Department of Commerce forthwith. Section 5. Best Available Science. All references listed in Appendix B are considered the review of scientific literature that was submitted, considered, and evaluated by citizens, agencies, tribes, the Planning Commission, Department of Community Development, and the Board of County Commissioners. This literature is referred to as the best available 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 5of108 science ("BAS"). BAS was included in the citizen, Planning Commission, and Board of County Commissioner review. Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or section of this Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance or its application to other persons or circumstances shall be fully valid and shall not be affected. Section 6. SEPA Compliance. The County published a SEPA Checklist and Addendum on January 22, 2020. The SEPA Checklist and Addendum provides supplemental information to the Jefferson County Final Environmental Impact Statement (Final EIS), May 27, 1998, and to related SEPA documents in were documents adopted. An agency may use previously prepared environmental documents to evaluate proposed actions, alternatives, or environmental impacts. The proposals may be the same as or different than those analyzed in the existing documents (WAC 197-11-600[2]). These documents are listed in response to Question 8 of the SEPA Checklist and Addendum and were adopted in association with the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations. See the Determination of Significance and Notice of Adoption published January 22, 2020. Section 7. Effective Date. The Ordinance becomes effective upon adoption by the BoCC. Approved and adopted this 10th day of March 2020 at 1:44:29. fes. 4 v 7 ,, SEAL: JEFFERSON OUNTY BOARD, E ISS • Aigyk Greg 7r. rton, air7 David livan, Member ATTEST Kat Dean, Member APPROVED AS TO FORM: iW Otd- Carolyn allaway Iry ip C. Hunsucker, Date Deputy Clerk of the Board Chief Civil Deputy Prosecuting Attorney 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 6 of 108 APPENDIX A Chapter 18.10 DEFINITIONS Sections: 18.10.010 A definitions. Agriculture" means the science, art, and business of producing crops, or raising livestock; farming. Agriculture, existing and ongoing" is defined as follows, except for JCC Chapter 18.22 which is governed by the definition of agricultural activities. For all other chapters, "agriculture, existing and ongoing" means any agricultural activity conducted on an ongoing basis on lands enrolled in the open space tax program for agriculture or designated as agricultural lands of long-term commercial significance on the official map of Comprehensive Plan land use designations; provided, agricultural activities were conducted on those lands at any time during the five-year period preceding April 28, 2003. Agricultural use ceases when the area on which it is conducted is converted to a nonagricultural use. Agriculture, new" is defined as follows, except for JCC Chapter 18.22 which is governed by the definition of agricultural activities. For all other chapters, "agriculture, new" means agricultural activities proposed or conducted after April 28, 2003, and that do not meet the definition of existing ongoing agriculture." Agricultural activities" has the same meaning as in RCW 90.58.065(2)(a), as it may be modified in the future and currently reads "agricultural uses and practices including, but not limited to: Producing, breeding, or increasing agricultural products; rotating and changing agricultural crops; allowing land used for agricultural activities to lie fallow in which it is plowed and tilled but left unseeded; allowing land used for agricultural activities to lie dormant as a result of adverse agricultural market conditions; allowing land used for agricultural activities to lie dormant because the land is enrolled in a local, state, or federal conservation program, or the land is subject to a conservation easement; conducting agricultural operations; maintaining, repairing, and replacing agricultural equipment; maintaining, repairing, and replacing agricultural facilities, provided that the replacement facility is no closer to the shoreline than the original facility; and maintaining agricultural lands under production or cultivation." Agricultural best management practices (BMPs)" mean schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, and other management practices to prevent or reduce pollution of waters or degradation of wetlands and fish and wildlife habitat areas. Agricultural checklist" means the checklist required by JCC 18.22.830(3). Agricultural land" has the same meaning as in WAC 365-190-030(1). Agricultural land of local importance" means land in addition to designated prime agricultural land that is of local importance for the production of food, fiber, forage, or oilseed crops. Generally, additional farmlands of local importance include those that are nearly prime farmland and that economically produce high yields of crops when treated or managed according to acceptable farming methods. Such farmlands may include areas of commercial aquaculture. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 7/108 APPENDIX A Agricultural product or commodity" is defined as follows, except for Chapter 18.22 JCC. For all other chapters, "agricultural product or commodity" means any plant or part of a plant, or animal, or animal product, produced by a producer primarily for sale, consumption, propagation, or other use by people or animals. For JCC Chapter 18.22 agricultural products are defined in RCW 90.58.065(2)(b). Agricultural resource lands (agricultural lands)" means lands that are primarily devoted to the commercial production of horticultural, viticultural,floricultural, dairy, apiary, vegetable, or animals products or of berries, grain, hay, straw, turf, seed, or Christmas trees not subject to the excise tax imposed by RCW 84.33.100 through RCW 84.33.140,finfish in upland hatcheries, or livestock, and that have long-term commercial significance for agricultural production (RCW 36.70A.030(2)). Agricultural resource lands are divided into two land use designations, prime(AP- 20) and local (AL-20), in the Comprehensive Plan. Agricultural warehouse (public warehouse)" means any elevator, mill, subterminal grain warehouse, terminal warehouse, country warehouse, or other structure or enclosure that is used or usable for the storage of agricultural products, and in which commodities are received from the public for storage, handling, conditioning, or shipment for compensation. The term does not include any warehouse storing or handling fresh fruits or vegetables, any warehouse used exclusively for cold storage, or any warehouse that conditions yearly less than 300 tons of an agricultural commodity for compensation. Agritourism" means agriculturally related accessory uses designed to bring the public to the farm on a temporary or continuous basis, such as U-Pick farm sales, retail sales of farm products, farm mazes, pumpkin patch sales, farm animal viewing and petting, wagon rides, farm tours, horticultural nurseries and associated display gardens, cider pressing, wine or cheese tasting, etc. 18.10.020 B definitions. Buffer" means an area that is intended to protect the functions and values of critical areas. Protecting these functions and values includes the preservation of existing native and nonnative vegetation where it exists, unless otherwise required to be replaced with native vegetation through mitigation or voluntarily enhanced or restored. 18.10.030 C definitions. Channel migration zone" (or CMZ) means an area within the lateral extent of likely stream channel movement that is subject to risk due to stream bank destabilization, rapid stream incision, stream bank erosion and shifts in the location of stream channels. "Channel migration zone" means the historic channel migration zone (which is the footprint of the active channel documented through historical photographs and maps), the avulsion hazard zone (which is an area with the potential for movement of the main river channel into a new location), and the erosion hazard area (which is an area outside the historic channel migration zone and the avulsion hazard zone, and includes an erosion setback for a 100-year period of time and a geotechnical setback to account for slope retreat to a stable angle of repose). "Channel migration zone" does not include disconnected migration areas, which are areas that have been disconnected from the 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 8/108 APPENDIX A river by legally existing artificial structure(s) that restrain channel migration (such as levees and transportation facilities built above or constructed to remain intact through the 100-year flood elevation), that are no longer available for migration by the river. "Channel migration zone" may exclude areas that lie behind a lawfully established flood protection facility that is likely to be maintained by existing programs for public maintenance consistent with designation and classification criteria specified by public rule. When a natural geologic feature affects channel migration, the channel migration zone width will consider such natural constraints. "High channel migration hazard" (or high risk CMZ) for the Big Quilcene, Little Quilcene, Dosewallips, Duckabush, and Lower Hoh Rivers means those nondisconnected portions of the channel that are likely to migrate within a 50-year time frame. For the Big Quilcene, Little Quilcene, Dosewallips, and Duckabush Rivers, "moderate channel migration hazard" (or moderate risk CMZ) means those nondisconnected portions of the channel that are likely to migrate within a 50- to 100-year time frame; and, "low channel migration hazard" (or low risk CMZ) means those nondisconnected portions of the channel that are likely to migrate beyond a 100-year time frame. For the Lower Hoh River, "moderately high hazard" (or moderately high risk CMZ) means those nondisconnected portions of the channel that are likely to migrate within a 50- to 100-year time frame, "moderate hazard" means those nondisconnected portions of the channel that are likely to migrate beyond a 100-year time frame, and "low hazard" means the nondisconnected portions of the channel that are less likely to be affected by channel migration, but are still at risk due to their location on the valley floor. Rivers that have not been evaluated or mapped for CMZs include: Thorndyke Creek, Shine Creek, Chimacum Creek, Snow Creek, Salmon Creek, Upper Hoh River, Bogachiel River, Clearwater River, and Quinault River. Critical aquifer recharge areas" has the same meaning as in WAC 365-190-030(3). Critical areas" has the same meaning as in WAC 365-190-030(4). Critical area buffer" means any buffer required by Chapter 18.22 JCC. 18.10.040 D definitions. None. 18.10.050 E definitions. Erosion hazard areas" has the same meaning as in WAC 365-190-030(5). 18.10.060 F definitions. Farm assistance agencies" means federal, state, or local agencies with expertise in the design, implementation, and evaluation of conservation practices including but not limited to the federal Natural Resource Conservation Service, the Washington Department of Agriculture, or the Jefferson County Conservation District. Farmed wetland" means wet meadow, grazed or tilled: an emergent wetland that has grasses, sedges, rushes or other herbaceous vegetation as its predominant vegetation and has been previously converted to agricultural activities. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 9/108 APPENDIX A Farm equipment"for all chapters in Title 18 JCC, except Chapter 18.22 JCC, includes, but is not limited to, tractors, trailers, combines, tillage implements, balers, and other equipment, including attachments and accessories that are used in the planting, cultivating, irrigation, harvesting, and marketing of agricultural, horticultural, or livestock products. Farm equipment for purposes of Chapter 18.22 JCC is governed by the definition of agricultural activities. Farm plan" means a conservation plan developed by a farm assistance agency and a landowner outlining a series of actions developed to meet a landowner's goals while protecting water quality and the natural resources within and around the farm property. Many things are considered in a farm plan including farm size, soil types, slope of the land, proximity to streams,wetlands or water bodies, type and numbers of livestock or crops, resources such as machinery or buildings and finances available. The terms conservation plan and farm plan are interchangeable in this context. Farm worker housing" means a place, area, or piece of land where sleeping places or housing sites are provided by an agricultural employer for agricultural employees. Field Office Technical Guide (FOTG)" means a USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service manual that contains information for use in technical assistance to decision-makers for resource management. Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas" has the same meaning as in WAC 365-190-030(6). Forest land" has the same meaning as in WAC 365-190-030(7). Frequently flooded areas" has the same meaning as in WAC 365-190-030(8). 18.10.070 G definitions. Geologically hazardous areas" has the same meaning as in WAC 365-190-030(9). Geotechnical professional" means a person with experience and training in analyzing, evaluating, and mitigating any of the following: landslide, erosion, seismic, or mine hazards, or hydrogeology, fluvial geomorphology, and river dynamics. A geotechnical professional shall be licensed in the State of Washington as an engineering geologist, hydrogeologist, or professional engineer. In accordance with WAC 308-15-140 and 196-27-020, licensed engineering geologists, hydrogeologists, and professional engineers shall affix their signatures or seals only to plans or documents dealing with subject matter in which they are qualified by training or experience. 18.10.080 H definitions. Hydrogeologist" means a person who is qualified to engage in the practice of hydrogeology, has met the qualifications in hydrogeology established under Chapter 18.220 RCW, and has been issued a license in hydrogeology by the Washington State Geologist Licensing Board. In accordance with WAC 308-15-140 and 196-27-020, licensed hydrogeologists shall affix their signatures or seals only to plans or documents dealing with subject matter in which they are qualified by training or experience. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 10/108 APPENDIX A 18.10.090 I definitions. None. 18.10.100 J definitions. None. 18.10.110 K definitions. None. 18.10.120 L definitions. Landslide hazard areas" has the same meaning as in WAC 365-190-030(10). Long-term commercial significance" has the same meaning as in WAC 365-190-030(11). 18.10.130 M definitions. Mine hazard areas" has the same meaning as in WAC 365-190-030(12). Mineral resource lands" has the same meaning as in WAC 365-190-030(13). Minerals" has the same meaning as in WAC 365-190-030(14). 18.10.140 N definitions. Natural resource lands" has the same meaning as in WAC 365-190-030(15). 18.10.150 0 definitions. None. 18.10.150 P definitions. Producer" means a person engaged in agricultural activities, including but not limited to farmers, ranchers, vineyardists, plant propagators, Christmas tree growers, aqua culturists, floriculturists, orchardists, foresters, or another comparable person. Public facilities" has the same meaning as in WAC 365-190-030(16). Public services" has the same meaning as in WAC 365-190-030(17). 18.10.170 Q definitions. None. 18.10.180 R definitions. RCW" means the Revised Code of Washington, as it now exists or may be amended in the future. 18.10.190 S definitions. Seiche and landslide generated wave hazard areas" means lake and marine shoreline areas susceptible to flooding, inundation, debris impact, or mass wasting as the result of a seiche or 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 11/108 APPENDIX A landslide generated waves. No known best available science is currently available to characterize potential seiche hazards in Jefferson County. Seismic hazard areas" has the same meaning as in WAC 365-190-030(18). Site evaluation checklist" means all the information described in JCC 18.22.945(3)(d). Species of local importance" has the same meaning as in WAC 365-190-030(19). SIPZ" means seawater intrusion protection zones. 18.10.200 T definitions. Tsunami hazard areas" means coastal areas susceptible to flooding, inundation, debris impact, or mass wasting as the result of a tsunami generated by seismic events. 18.10.210 U definitions. Urban growth" has the same meaning as in WAC 365-190-030(20). 18.10.220 V definitions. None. 18.10.230 W definitions. WAC" means the Washington Administrative Code, as it now exists or may be amended in the future. Wetland" or"wetlands" has the same meaning as in WAC 365-190-030(22). Wetland specialist" means a person with experience and training in wetlands issues and with experience in performing delineations, analyzing wetland functions and values, analyzing wetland impacts, and recommending wetland mitigation and restoration. Qualifications include: (1) Bachelor of Science or Bachelor of Arts or equivalent degree in biology, botany, environmental studies, fisheries, soil science, wildlife, agriculture, or related field, and two years of related work experience, including a minimum of one year experience delineating wetlands and preparing wetland reports and mitigation plans using the following manuals and guidelines: Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands, Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual 1987 edition and corresponding guidance letters, March 1997 Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual, Washington State Wetlands Rating System for Western Washington, as now or hereafter amended. Additional education may substitute for one year of related work experience; or, (2) four years of related work experience and training, with a minimum of two years' experience. delineating wetlands using the manuals cited above and preparing wetland reports and mitigation plans. The person should be familiar with the Pierce County Site Development Regulations, Pierce County Wetland Management Policies, Ordinance Nos. 88-182 and 89-162, and the requirements of this Title. Wildlife biologist" means a person with experience and training within the last ten years in the principles of wildlife management and with practical knowledge in the habits, distribution, and environmental management of wildlife. Qualifications include: 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 12/108 APPENDIX A a) Certification as professional wildlife biologist through the Wildlife Society; b) Bachelor of Science or Bachelor of Arts degree in wildlife management, wildlife biology, ecology, zoology, or a related field from an accredited institution and two years of professional field experience; or, c) Five or more years of experience as a practicing wildlife biologist with a minimum of three years of practical field experience. 18.10.240 X definitions. None. 18.10.250 Y definitions. None. 18.10.260 Z definitions. None. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 13/108 APPENDIX A Chapter 18.20 PERFORMANCE AND USE-SPECIFIC STANDARDS Sections: JCC 18.20.030 Agricultural activities and accessory uses. 1) Definitions. For the purposes of this section, the definitions in Chapter 18.10 JCC shall apply. 2) Agricultural Activities. a) Where Allowed. Agricultural activities, as defined above and excepting those related to recreational marijuana/cannabis, are an allowed use under any of the Comprehensive Plan land use designations, subject to the provisions of this subsection, except that "processing," packing," and "sales" are regulated under subsection (3) (Accessory Uses). Agricultural activities related to marijuana producing, processing and retail are subject to this section and JCC 18.20.295 for recreational marijuana/cannabis. Where conflicts occur, the more restrictive performance standards shall apply. b) When Exempt from Permit Process. Agricultural activities are considered a matter of right and not subject to land use permits or approval from the administrator, except: i) Other Applicable Laws and Rules. This section does not exempt the producer from acquiring any other required approvals from county, state, or federal agencies, including, but not limited to, approvals related to matters of public health, safety, and welfare. ii) Critical Areas Ordinance. If there is any conflict between this chapter and Chapter 18.22 JCC, the most protective requirement applies. iii) Stormwater Management. Jefferson County stormwater management regulations and procedures are described in JCC 18.30.060, Grading and excavation standards, and JCC 18.30.070, Stormwater management standards. These sections pertain to agricultural activities in the following manner: A) Commercial agriculture is exempt from stormwater management minimum standards pursuant to JCC 18.30.070(2) and the referenced the Washington Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington manual). B) According to the manual, "commercial agriculture" is defined as: Those activities conducted on lands defined in RCW 84.34.020(2), and activities involved in the production of crops or livestock for wholesale trade. An activity ceases to be considered commercial agriculture when the area on which it is conducted is proposed for conversion to a nonagricultural use or has lain idle for more than five years, unless the idle land is registered in a federal or state soils conservation program, or unless the activity is maintenance of irrigation ditches, laterals, canals, or drainage ditches related to an existing and ongoing agricultural activity. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 14/108 APPENDIX A C) Accordingly, agricultural activities such as land preparation for the cultivation of crops or the grazing of livestock and the maintenance of agricultural irrigation and drainage infrastructure are exempt from meeting the minimum requirements for stormwater management and from obtaining a stormwater management permit. D) This exemption does not apply to new development that is secondarily related to agriculture and that involves the construction of new structures, such as buildings for agricultural processing and retail sales, and the addition of impervious surfaces, such as compacted areas designed to accommodate parking. E) This exemption does not apply to the initial clearing of forested land. Conversion of forested land to some other use incompatible with commercial forestry, as defined in the Forest Practices Act, Chapter 76.09 RCW, requires review under JCC 18.20.160, 18.30.060 and 18.30.070. The Washington Department of Natural Resources may also require a Class IV general forest practices application. iv) Farm Ponds and Irrigation Infrastructure. A) Construction or expansion of farm and stock ponds and irrigation ditches and infrastructure in association with commercial agriculture as defined above is exempt from meeting stormwater management minimum standards and from obtaining approval; provided, these activities are not conducted in critical areas or critical area buffers as defined in Chapter 18.22 JCC. Landowners/Producers are encouraged to document the creation of new exempt ponds through photographs(before, during, and after construction) in order to facilitate any future development review on the property. B) Generally, pursuant to JCC 18.30.060(5)(b), drainage improvements constructed in accordance with JCC 18.30.060(2) and 18.30.070 and construction of a pond of one-half acre or less which is not in a regulated wetland are exempt from the stormwater management permit requirement outlined in JCC 18.30.070(5). v) Livestock Management. A) On designated agricultural lands, livestock management is allowed as a matter of right, except: I) Any operation that meets the state or federal definition for an animal feeding operation (AFO) requires a consistency review land use permit (i.e., "Yes" or Type I). II) Any activity that meets the state or federal definition for a custom slaughtering establishment, custom meat facility, or medium concentrated animal feeding operation (medium CAFO) requires a conditional administrative (C(a)) land use permit. III) Any operation that meets the state or federal definition for a large concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO), certified feed lot, public livestock market, stockyard, warehouse, or grain elevator requires a conditional use (C) land use permit. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 15/108 APPENDIX A B) On lands that are not designated agricultural lands, livestock management is allowed as a matter of right, except: I) The slaughter and preparation of between 100 and 1,000 chickens or other fowl in a calendar year by the agricultural producer of the chickens for the sale of whole raw chickens by the producer directly to the ultimate consumer at the producer's farm requires a conditional administrative (C(a)) land use permit; over 1,000 shall be prohibited. II) Any operation that meets the state or federal definition for an animal feeding operation (AFO) requires a conditional administrative land use permit (C(a)). III) Any operation that meets the state or federal definition for a custom slaughtering establishment, custom meat facility, certified feed lot, public livestock market, stockyard, warehouse, grain elevator, or medium or large concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO) shall be prohibited, except in the heavy industrial land use designation, where a conditional use (C) land use permit shall be required. C) Facilities for breeding and maintaining working dogs raised for livestock management purposes are exempt from performance of JCC 18.20.060(2), Animal kennels, catteries, and shelters, in order to allow livestock guardian dogs to work during nighttime hours. Facilities for breeding and raising dogs for show or sale must be incidental and accessory to the principal farm activities and meet all of the performance standards for animal kennels and shelters at JCC 18.20.060(2). vi) Structures. According to JCC 15.05.040(1), certain types of agricultural structures do not require a building permit from the department of community development. A) No county building permit is required for buildings or structures erected exclusively for the storage of livestock, feed, or farm implements; provided, these structures are: freestanding, located at least 10 feet from the nearest structure and not attached to any structure, unless attached to another agricultural building; do not contain plumbing, except as necessary to maintain farm animals; do not contain a heat source, such as a wood stove or electric heat, unless specifically permitted. B) Agricultural buildings that contain plumbing other than that as authorized above must obtain a plumbing installation permit and health department approval. C) Agricultural buildings that contain a heat source for an agricultural purpose must obtain a wood stove permit or an electrical permit as appropriate. D) Agricultural buildings used for the storage of private automobiles, trucks, etc., which are not licensed as farm equipment, are considered garages or carports, and must obtain a building permit. E) Agricultural buildings used for the purpose of hosting members of the public for the purpose of retail sales of agricultural products or machinery constructed on site shall require a building permit to ensure life safety and structural integrity. If an older 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 16/108 APPENDIX A agricultural building constructed under the building permit exemption for agricultural buildings is proposed for hosting members of the public, the building shall be brought into compliance with the building code, as determined by the building official. F) The building official shall judge whether a proposed structure, a structure under construction, or a completed structure violates this building permit exemption. A structure determined to be in violation will be considered a structure subject to the building code. G) Temporary growing structures used solely for the commercial production of horticultural plants including ornamental plants, flowers, vegetables, and fruits are not considered structures subject to the State Building Code, Chapter 19.27 RCW, pursuant to RCW 19.27.065. 3) Accessory Uses. a) General Provisions. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.177: i) Accessory uses that support, promote, or sustain agricultural operations and production shall comply with the following: A) Accessory uses shall be located, designed, and operated so as not to interfere with natural resource land uses and shall be accessory to the growing of crops or raising of animals; B) Accessory commercial or retail uses shall predominantly produce, store, or sell regionally produced agricultural products from one or more producers, products derived from regional agricultural production, agriculturally related experiences, or products produced on site. Accessory commercial and retail uses shall offer for sale predominantly products or services produced on site; and, C) Accessory uses may operate out of existing or new buildings with parking and other supportive uses consistent with the size and scale of existing agricultural buildings on the site but shall not otherwise convert agricultural land to nonagricultural uses. ii) Accessory uses may include compatible commercial or retail uses including, but not limited to: A) Storage and refrigeration of regional agricultural products; B) Production, sales, and marketing of value-added agricultural products derived from regional sources; C) Supplemental sources of on-farm income that support and sustain on-farm agricultural operations and production; D) Support services that facilitate the production, marketing, and distribution of agricultural products; and, 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 17/108 APPENDIX A E) Off-farm and on-farm sales and marketing of predominantly regional agricultural products and experiences locally made art and arts and crafts, and ancillary retail sales or service activities. b)Where Allowed. Accessory uses to agriculture are allowed exclusively in agricultural lands, except those for recreational marijuana. All recreational marijuana activities are subject to specific process approval allowances and prohibitions per JCC 18.15.040, Table 3-1, for recreational marijuana and the performance standards in JCC 18.20.295. c) Where Prohibited. Accessory uses to agriculture, as defined, and regulated in this section, are prohibited in all land use districts except agricultural lands. Proposals that would be classified accessory uses in agricultural lands, such as processing, packing, and sales of agricultural products, may be considered and approved in other land use districts under different and appropriate land use classifications, such as commercial use, light industrial use, home business, cottage industry, or small-scale recreation and tourist use, subject to allowed and prohibited uses per land use district and the associated permit processes and approval criteria. d) When Exempt from Permit Process. Accessory uses on agricultural lands, except those for recreational marijuana, are considered a matter of right and not subject to land use permits or approval from the administrator, subject to the following limitations and provisions in association with these various use categories: i) General. All accessory uses, when exempted from a permit or approval process, shall be conducted in such a manner that: A) Parking for all visitors or suppliers is fully accommodated on site in a location and manner that does not encroach upon or negatively impact critical areas and their protection buffers and that converts as little prime agricultural soil as practicable into nonagricultural use. B) New structures are constructed or existing structures are expanded in a location and manner that does not encroach upon or negatively impact critical areas and their protection buffers and that converts as little prime agricultural soil as practicable into nonagricultural use. ii) Composting and recycling must be nonhazardous and biodegradable. iii) Processing and packing agricultural products if at least 50 percent of the product was raised or produced on the site or on other Jefferson County parcels, including but not limited to prepared foods, cheese, wine, beer, decorative materials, compost, etc., including cooperative processing and packing involving more than one local producer. iv) Retail and wholesale sales of agricultural products from existing or new farm stands and farm buildings, including cooperative sales involving more than one local producer, subject to the following provisions: 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 18/108 APPENDIX A A) At least 50 percent of the square footage of the undercover, retail display area is comprised of products from the farm on which the stand is located or from land owned by the owner of the stand. B) If less than 50 percent of the products sold come from the farm on which the sale occurs, all the products sold must primarily supply local agricultural activities and the sales must be accessory to the prime function of the land as a farm. Examples are sale of hay, specialized livestock materials, farm equipment, livestock fencing, horticultural supplies, etc. v) Farm Equipment. Commercial repair and maintenance of farm equipment and sales of equipment, structures, or machinery manufactured on site for use in agricultural operations subject to the following provisions: A) The activity must be accessory to the main function of the property as a farm. B) The activity shall comply with JCC 18.20.220(1)(a), (c), and (d), Industrial uses — Standards for site development. C) Storage of vehicles, equipment, materials or products not related to agriculture must meet the requirements of JCC 18.20.280, Outdoor storage yards. vi) Agritourism. Agriculturally related activities designed to bring the public to the farm on a temporary or continuous basis, such as U-Pick farm sales, retail sales of farm products, farm mazes, pumpkin patch sales, farm animal viewing and petting, wagon rides, farm tours, horticultural nurseries and associated display gardens, cider pressing, wine or cheese tasting, etc., subject to the following provisions: A) All activities must be closely related to normal agricultural activities. Activities which simply adopt an agricultural theme or setting but which are not otherwise a normal extension of agricultural activities are not permitted as a matter of right; however, they may be considered under JCC 18.20.350, Small-scale recreation and tourist uses. The following list of uses not permitted as a matter of right is illustrative but not exhaustive: mechanical rides such as Ferris wheels and carousels, arcade type games and activities, dance halls, stage performances, drinking establishments that serve alcohol which is not wine produced on site,fireworks, sporting events, caged wild animals, exhibits, etc. B) Temporary events that are not related to agriculture are regulated by JCC 18.20.380, Temporary outdoor uses. vii) Classes. Subject to the following provisions: A) Classes are clearly accessory to the primary function of the farm. B) Classes must not exceed four weeks in length for any single course of instruction. Schools with classes that exceed four weeks must meet the provisions of subsection 3)(e)(ii)(B) of this section, addressing agricultural schools. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 19/108 APPENDIX A C) If students are regularly housed on site for the class, the provisions of JCC 18.20.210, Hospitality establishments, shall apply. viii) Lumber Mills and Associated Forestry Processing Activities and Uses. Harvesting, sawing, processing, assembling and selling lumber is limited to timber from the designated agricultural lands property on which the activity is located and is subject to the regulations of JCC 18.20.230, Lumber mills (portable and stationary). e) When Permit Process Is Required. i) Proposal Exceeds Terms or Limitations. Accessory uses on agricultural lands that are best described as one of the uses listed in subsection (3)(d) of this section and yet exceed or lie outside of the terms and limitations in subsection (3)(d) of this section are considered discretionary uses (i.e., "D" uses), as defined at JCC 18.15.020(1)(b), and subject to a Type II administrative review as specified in Chapter 18.40 JCC. The administrator may classify the proposed use as an allowed "yes" use, conditional administrative use, conditional use, or prohibited use.The permit process is subsequently conducted pursuant to Chapter 18.40 JCC according to the use classification. ii) Other Accessory Uses. The following accessory uses may be permitted on designated agricultural lands subject to a discretionary determination by the administrator(i.e., a Type II administrative review process for a "D" use); provided, they are located, designed and operated so as not to interfere with natural resource land uses and subject to the following provisions in association with these various use categories: A) Permanent or seasonal farm worker housing, in addition to an accessory dwelling unit; provided: I) The housing is used exclusively for agricultural workers on the farm and their families or members of the family of the farm owner with at least one member of each household actively working on the farm. II) The housing for farm labor is not sold, leased or rented to the general public unless the owner applies for and receives a permit for an agriculture-related recreational or tourist use as specified in JCC 18.20.350. III) The farm worker housing units are constructed in such a manner that they meet all applicable regulations for dwelling units for agricultural worker housing. IV) A covenant is recorded with the title of the parcel on which the housing is located in a form satisfactory to the county that specifies that the units are exclusively for use by farm laborers and their families employed on the property by the owner. The use of the farm labor dwelling units may be converted to nonagricultural uses and the covenant removed subject to approval by the administrator and issuance of any required land use permits. V) The accommodations shall not require the extension of public sewer services. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 20/108 APPENDIX A B) Agricultural schools which offer a program that lasts for more than 30 days per year per student and which may be the primary function of the land, subject to the following provisions: I) The predominant focus of the curriculum and activities of the school is closely tied to and dependent upon agricultural activities and facilities on the farm. If the school has a conventional curriculum and is merely utilizing an agrarian setting, it does not qualify for location on designated agricultural land. II) Agricultural schools under this section which also house students or faculty for the duration of the course of study must meet the requirements of JCC 18.40.490 for a conditional use permit. III) Buildings and parking facilities used for the school avoid location on prime agricultural soils, whenever practicable. C) Veterinary clinics or hospitals which have at least a portion of their business serving large domestic animals necessitating holding pens, paddocks, etc., subject to the provisions of JCC 18.20.420(1)(a) and (b). Veterinary clinics and hospitals that do not include an on-site, large animal practice are not permitted on land designated agricultural land. D) Farm restaurant when it is a component of the agritourism activities of a farm subject to the restrictions in JCC 18.20.350(1). E) Farm campground for fishing or hunting on or near farm property subject to the regulations in JCC 18.20.350(6)(a)(i) through (ix). F) Guide services associated with livestock used for trail riding, packing, etc. G) Rural recreational tourist lodging subject to the provisions of JCC 18.20.350. H) Commercial display gardens subject to the requirements of JCC 18.20.350(3). 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 21/108 APPENDIX A Chapter 18.22 CRITICAL AREAS Sections: Article I. Authority, Purpose, and Intent 18.22.100 Authority. 18.22.110 Purpose. 18.22.120 Intent and Construction of Chapter. Article II. Administrative Provisions 18.22.200 Applicability. 18.22.210 Identification and mapping of critical areas. 18.22.220 Critical area review process. 18.22.230 General exemptions. 18.22.240 Nonconforming uses and structures. 18.22.250 Variances. 18.22.260 Reasonable economic use exceptions. 18.22.270 Physical separation — Functional isolation. 18.22.280 Adaptive Management. Article III. Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas 18.22.300 Purpose. 18.22.310 Classification/designation. 18.22.320 Applicability. 18.22.330 Protection standards. Article IV. Frequently Flooded Areas 18.22.400 Purpose. 18.22.410 Classification/designation. 18.22.420 Applicability. 18.22.430 Protection Standards-Incorporation by reference of Chapter 15.15 JCC and additional requirements. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 22/108 APPENDIX A Article V. Geologically Hazardous Areas 18.22.500 Purpose. 18.22.510 Classification/designation. 18.22.520 Regulated activities. 18.22.530 Protection standards. 18.22.540 Required Assessments and Reports. Article VI. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (FWHCAs) 18.22.600 Purpose. 18.22.610 Classification/designation. 18.22.620 Regulated activities. 18.22.630 Protection standards. Table 18.22.630(1): Stream Buffers. Table 18.22.630(2): Buffers for Other FWHCAs. 18.22.640 Buffer Reductions and Averaging. 18.22.650 Habitat management plans—When required. 18.22.660 Mitigation. Article VII. Wetlands 18.22.700 Purpose. 18.22.710 Classification/designation. 18.22.720 Regulated activities. 18.22.730 Protection standards. Table 18.22.730(1)(a) Standard Wetland Buffer Widths. Table 18.22.730(1)(b) Required Measures to minimize impacts to wetlands Table 18.22.730(1)(c) Reduced Wetland Buffer Widths with integration of Table 18.22.730(1)(b) measures 18.22.740 Mitigation. Table 18.22.740(1): Required Replacement Ratios for Compensatory Wetland Mitigation. Article VIII Agriculture 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 23/108 APPENDIX A 18.22.800 Purpose. 18.22.810 Resource Concerns. 18.22.820 Applicability and Classification. 18.22.830 Protection Standards. Table 18.22.830(1): Agriculture Activities Allowances in Wetland/Stream and Buffers 18.22.840 Monitoring and Adaptive Management. 18.22.850 Compliance. 18.22.860 Limited Public Disclosure. Article IX. Special Reports 18.22.900 Purpose. 18.22.905 General requirements. 18.22.910 Waivers. 18.22.915 Retaining consultants. 18.22.920 Acceptance of special reports. 18.22.930 Critical aquifer recharge area reports. 18.22.940 Frequently flooded area reports. 18.22.945 Geologically hazardous area reports. 18.22.950 Habitat management plan. 18.22.955 Process and requirements for designating habitats of local importance as critical areas. 18.22.960 Wetland reports. 18.22.965 Critical area stewardship plan reports. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 24/108 APPENDIX A Article I. Authority, Purpose, and Intent 18.22.100 Authority. This chapter is adopted under the authority of Article XI, Section 11 of the Washington State Constitution, Chapter 36.70 RCW, which empowers a county to enact a critical area ordinance and provide for its administration, enforcement and amendment, and Chapter 36.70A RCW, the Growth Management Act. 18.22.110 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to adopt development regulations that protect critical areas that are required to be designated under RCW 36.70A.170, part of the Growth Management Act (Chapter 36.70A RCW). 18.22.120 Intent and Construction of Chapter. The intent of this chapter is to comply with the requirements for critical areas in the Growth Management Act(Chapter 36.70A RCW), the Growth Management Act implementing regulations Chapter 365-190 WAC), and the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. The provisions of this chapter and all proceedings under it shall be liberally construed with a view to affect its purpose and intent. Article II. Administrative Provisions 18.22.200 Applicability. 1) This chapter applies to any land disturbing activity, development, or activity undertaken on land located within or containing a critical area or a critical area buffer in Jefferson County. All persons within Jefferson County shall comply with this chapter. 2) Jefferson County shall not grant any permit or other approval to alter a critical area or a critical area buffer without ensuring compliance with this chapter. 3) No land disturbing activity, development, or activity on land located within or containing a critical area or a critical area buffer in Jefferson County shall be authorized without full compliance with the terms of this chapter. 4) Areas characterized by a particular critical area may also be subject to other regulations established by this chapter due to the overlap or multiple functions of some critical areas. When one critical area adjoins or overlaps another, the more restrictive standards shall apply. 5) Uses, development, and activities in critical areas or critical area buffers for which no permit or approval is required by any other provision of the Jefferson County Code nevertheless are subject to the requirements of this chapter. 6)When anyprovision of this chapter is in conflict with anyother section of the Jefferson CountyP Code, the provision that provides most protection to the critical area shall apply, except that any critical area occurring within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Management Act also shall follow the policies and regulations in Chapter 18.25 JCC. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 25/108 APPENDIX A 7)Compliance with these regulations does not remove an applicant from the obligation to comply with all other applicable federal, state, or local regulations. 8) Any action taken in a critical area or a critical area buffer designated by this chapter that is in violation of the standards and conditions contained in this chapter is expressly prohibited. 9) The requirements of this chapter shall apply concurrently with review conducted under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) (Chapter 43.21C RCW), as locally adopted Chapter 18.40 JCC). Any conditions required pursuant to this chapter shall be coordinated with the SEPA review and threshold determination. 10)This chapter applies to all forest practices over which Jefferson County has jurisdiction under Chapter 76.09 RCW and Title 222 WAC. 18.22.210 Identification and mapping of critical areas. 1)The approximate location and extent of critical areas within the county are displayed on various inventory maps available on the Jefferson County geographic information system (GIS)web site. 2)The critical areas maps are provided only as a general guide to alert the viewer to the possible location and extent of critical areas. These maps shall not be relied upon exclusively to establish the existence/absence or boundaries of a critical area, or to establish whether all of the elements necessary to identify an area as a critical area actually exist. 3)The type, extent and boundaries may be determined in the field by a geotechnical professional, wetland specialist, wildlife biologist or staff person according to the requirements of this chapter. In the event of a conflict between a critical area location shown on the county's maps and that of an on-site determination, the on-site determination will apply. 4) To the extent practicable, the county shall ensure that its critical area maps are updated as inventories are completed in compliance with the requirements of the Growth Management Act Chapter 36.70A RCW). 18.22.220Critical area review process. 1) All applicants for new development are encouraged have a customer assistance meeting with the department prior to applying for a permit. Fees for a customer assistance meeting may be applied towards the application fee for the same project. The purpose of this customer assistance meeting is to discuss zoning and applicable critical area requirements, to review any conceptual site plans prepared by the applicant and to identify potential impacts and mitigation measures. Such conference shall be for the convenience of the applicant, and any recommendations shall not be binding on the applicant or the county. 2) The Department shall perform a critical area review for any application submitted for a regulated activity. Reviews for multiple critical areas shall occur concurrently. For critical areas within shoreline jurisdiction, critical area review shall occur as part of the shoreline review process. 3) The Department shall, to the extent reasonable, consolidate the processing of related aspects of other County regulatory programs which affect activities in regulated critical areas, such as 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 26/108 APPENDIX A subdivision or site development, with the approval process established in this chapter so as to provide a timely and coordinated review process. 4) As part of the review of all development or building-related approvals or permit applications, the Department shall review the information submitted by the applicant to: a) Confirm the nature and type of the critical area and evaluate any required assessments, reports, or studies; b) Determine whether the development proposal is consistent with this chapter; c) Determine whether any proposed alterations to the site containing critical areas are necessary; and, d) Determine if the mitigation and monitoring plans proposed by the applicant are sufficient to protect the public health, safety, and welfare consistent with the goals, purposes, objectives, and requirements of this chapter. 5) If a proposal has the potential to impact a critical area or a buffer,the administrator may require a special report pursuant to this chapter. When required, critical area special reports are subject to the following requirements: a) The applicant is required to submit a critical area report prepared by a qualified professional based on the report requirements of this chapter; b)The report will be evaluated to determine if all potential impacts to the critical area or buffer have been addressed in the critical area report; c) Any impacts of the proposed development will be reviewed for compliance with mitigation requirements (as defined in JCC 18.10.130) and determine if the mitigation plan sufficiently addresses the potential impacts; and, d) Ensure that the submittal for critical areas is consistent with other documents submitted as part of the application and that the submittal is consistent with the requirements for a complete application in Chapter 18.40 JCC. 6) At every stage of the application process, the burden of demonstrating that a proposal is consistent with this chapter is upon the applicant. 18.22.230 General exemptions. 1) The activities listed in JCC 18.22.230(5) are exempt from the requirements of this chapter, assuming the proposed activity complies with all provisions of the exemption. 2) The administrator may determine that an activity is closely allied or similar to any activity in this list even if the proposed does not meet the precise terms of a listed exempt activity. The administrator is authorized to determine through a Type I permit process whether or not a development should be classified as an exempt activity and that such an activity does not impact the functions and values of any critical area or a critical area buffer. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 27/108 APPENDIX A 3) It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide sufficient information for the administrator to determine that one of the exemptions listed in JCC 18.22.230(5) applies. 4) The following activities in critical areas or critical area buffers are exempt from the requirements of this chapter: a)Agriculture, as defined in JCC 18.10.010, may continue in substantively the same manner; provided, the activity does not result in adverse impacts to a critical area or a critical area buffer. This exemption shall include maintenance and repair of lawfully established structures, infrastructure, drainage and irrigation ditches, and farm ponds; provided, maintenance work does not expand further into a critical area. b) Forest Practices. Class I, II, Ill, and IV special (not Class IV general) forest practices regulated and conducted in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 76.09 RCW and forest practice regulations, Title 222 WAC, except where the lands have been or are proposed to be converted to a use other than commercial forest product production. c) Maintenance —Transportation. Maintenance or reconstruction of existing public or private roads, paths, bicycle ways, trails, and bridges, provided that the maintenance or reconstruction complies with the additional requirements in JCC 18.22.230(5). d) Maintenance or Reconstruction — On-site Sewage Systems. Maintenance or reconstruction of on-site sewage systems; provided, the maintenance or reconstruction complies with the additional requirements in JCC 18.22.230(5). e) Maintenance—Drainage. Maintenance and repair of existing drainage facilities or systems and flood control structures, including, but not limited to, ditches that do not meet the criteria for being considered a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area, culverts, catch basins, levees, reservoirs, and outfalls; provided, the maintenance or repair complies with the additional requirements in JCC 18.22.230(5). f) Utility activities. This exemption is limited to the utility activities listed below; provided, the utility activities complies with the additional requirements in JCC 18.22.230(5): i) Normal and routine maintenance or repair of existing utility facilities or rights-of-way; or, ii) Installation, construction, relocation and replacement, operation, repair, or alteration of all utility lines, equipment, or appurtenances, not including substations, in improved road rig hts-of-way. g) Reconstruction, Remodeling, or Maintenance — Structures. This exemption is limited to reconstruction, remodeling, or maintenance of existing structures within the footprint of an existing lawfully established structure provided the maintenance complies with the additional requirements in JCC 18.22.230(5), work areas are minimized to the fullest extent possible, work areas are restored to previous conditions as soon as construction is complete, and staging areas are located outside of all critical areas and critical area buffers. This exemption shall not apply if the activity creates or continues a circumstance where personal or property damage is likely due to conditions of the critical area or if there is further intrusion into a critical area or a critical area buffer. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 28/108 APPENDIX A h) Site Investigative Work. Site investigative work in wetlands, landslide hazard areas, riverine and coastal erosion hazard areas, or fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, or their critical area buffers that is necessary for land use application submittals or permit compliance, including but not limited to groundwater monitoring wells, sediment sampling, surveys, soil borings, shallow soil test pits, and percolation tests involving no fill or use of heavy equipment; provided, the site investigative work complies with the additional requirements in JCC 18.22.230(5) and excavation for soil logs or percolation tests are filled. i) Emergency Action. Action that is taken which is necessary to resolve or prevent imminent threat or danger to public health or safety, or to public or private property, or serious environmental degradation; provided, the emergency action complies with the additional requirements in JCC 18.22.230(5). If the nature of the emergency requires immediate action within a time period too short to allow full compliance with this chapter, the department, as well as any federal or state agencies with jurisdiction (e.g.,the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers), must be notified of the emergency action within one working day of the initiation of the emergency action. Any person or agency undertaking emergency action using this exemption must submit a complete application to department for review and approval within 30 days of abatement of the emergency, and the "after-the-fact" application must show compliance with all requirements of this chapter. Any impacts to critical areas or critical area buffers that are not mitigated within one year of issuance of an 'after-the-fact' permit shall be in violation of this exemption and may be subject to enforcement actions by the department. j) Artificial Wetlands and Artificial Ponds. Artificial Wetlands and Artificial Ponds, provided: i) The artificial wetland or pond does not meet the definition of wetland or fish and wildlife habitat conservation area; and, ii) The artificial wetland or pond was not historically constructed from a wetland or fish and wildlife habitat conservation area (without receiving all applicable permits to modify the critical area). k) Irrigation. Operation, maintenance and repair of dikes, ditches, reservoirs, ponds and other irrigation structures and facilities that do not require a state hydraulic permit and do not meet the criteria for being designated a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area; provided, the maintenance or repair complies with JCC 18.22.230(5). I) Passive Recreation. Passive recreation, when the activity does not cause adverse impacts. Examples include, but are not limited to, such recreational uses as swimming, canoeing/kayaking, hunting, and fishing (pursuant to state law), bird watching, hiking, and bicycling. m) Existing Residential Landscaping. Planting, irrigating, mowing, pruning, and maintenance and repair of land scaping structures; provided, these activities are part of existing normal residential landscaping activities and no building permit is required and the landscaping complies with JCC 18.22.230(5). This exemption does not allow any additional intrusion, expansion, or introduction of non-native species into a critical area or a critical area buffer. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 29/108 APPENDIX A n) Noxious Weed Control. Removal or eradication of noxious weeds listed in Chapter 16-750 WAC. Such activity is the responsibility of the landowner; provided, the following conditions are met: i)The removal or control of noxious weeds shall follow guidelines issued by the Jefferson County noxious weed control board. The Jefferson County noxious weed control board shall coordinate with the department of planning and community development for the control of noxious weeds in wetlands. ii) All herbicide applications in aquatic environments shall conform to the rules of the Washington Department of Ecology, Washington Department of Agriculture and Washington Department of Natural Resources, pursuant to Chapters 16-228, 173-201a, and 222-38 WAC. o) Harvesting of Wild Crops. The harvesting of wild crops; provided, that the harvesting: i) Is not injurious to natural reproduction of such crops; ii) Does not require tilling soil, planting crops, or changing existing topography, water conditions, or water sources; and, iii) Does not have any adverse impacts on protection of the critical area or a critical area buffer. p) Planting Native Vegetation. The enhancement of a critical area buffer by planting native vegetation. q) New Trails. The construction of new, unpaved, non-motorized trails when located in the outer 25% of a wetland or a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area or their critical area buffers; provided, the new trail is no wider than five feet. This exemption shall not apply within a frequently flooded area or its critical area buffer, where development must follow FEMA requirements, or within a geologically hazardous area or its critical area buffer if the new trail will be for public use. r) Navigation Aids and Boundary Markers. Installation of navigation aids and boundary markers; provided, they are installed in accordance with applicable state and federal laws or the installation of mooring buoys in accordance with the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife design guidelines and the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Program (Chapter 18.25 JCC). s) Beaver Dam Alterations with a Hydraulic Project Approval Pursuant to Chapter 77.55 RCW and Chapter 220-660 WAC. Beaver dam alteration in stream channels when undertaken with a Hydraulic Project Approval issued by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife pursuant to Chapter 77.55 RCW and Chapter 220-660 WAC. 5) Additional Protection and Restoration Requirements. Where compliance with this section is required by a section above, all of the following requirements must be met: 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 30/108 APPENDIX A a) Prior to the start of the activity for which an exemption is sought, the applicant must submit to the department a written description of the activity that includes at least the following information: i) Type, timing, frequency, and sequence of the activity to be conducted; ii) Type of equipment to be used (hand or mechanical); iii) Manner in which the equipment will be used; and, iv) The best management practices to be used. The written description shall be valid for five years; provided, there is no significant change in the type or extent of the activity. b) The activity cannot further alter, impact, or encroach upon critical areas or critical area buffers and no reasonable or practicable alternative exists. c)The activity cannot further affect the functions of a critical area or a critical area buffer, and no reasonable or practicable alternative exists. d) Best management practices must be implemented to minimize impacts to critical areas and critical area buffers during the activity. e) Disturbed critical areas and critical area buffers must be restored immediately after the activity is complete. f) Any impacts of the activity to a critical area or a critical area buffer must be mitigated, as approved by the administrator. 5) The administrator has the authority to: a) Request information from an applicant to ensure compliance with exemption requirements; b) Determine whether or not an application meets the exemptions listed; and, c) Take enforcement action for any land disturbing activity, development, or action undertaken on land located within or containing a critical area or a critical area buffer in Jefferson County that does not meet exemption requirements. 18.22.240 Nonconforming uses and structures. 1) Any legal use or legal structure in existence on the effective date of this chapter that does not meet the critical area or critical area buffer requirements of this chapter for any designated critical area shall be considered a legal nonconforming use. 2) Any use or structure for which an application has vested or for which a permit has been obtained prior to the effective date of this chapter, that does not meet the critical area buffer requirements of this chapter for any designated critical area, shall be considered a legal nonconforming use. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 31/108 APPENDIX A 3) A legal nonconforming use or structure may be maintained or repaired as allowed by this chapter and the nonconforming provisions of JCC 18.20.260. 18.22.250 Variance 1) Requests for relief from the dimensional or performance standards of this chapter shall require a critical areas variance which shall be processed as a Type III permit; provided: 2) The Hearing Examiner in accordance with Chapter 2.30 JCC shall have the authority to grant a variance from the requirements of this chapter when, in the opinion of the Hearing Examiner, all of the following criteria have been met: a) There are special circumstances applicable to the subject property or to the intended use such as shape, topography, location, or surroundings that do not apply generally to surrounding properties or that make it impossible to redesign the project to preclude the need for a variance; b) The applicant has avoided impacts and provided mitigation to the maximum practical extent; c)The critical area buffer reduction proposed through the variance is the minimum necessary to accommodate the permitted use; d) Granting the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvement; e) Granting the variance is necessary to ensure consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and any attendant public service obligations; and, f) No other practicable or reasonable alternative exists. 2) In lieu of criteria (2)(a)-(f), above, an applicant may pursue a critical area variance through proof of all of the following criteria: a) The applicant has avoided impacts and provided mitigation, in accordance with this chapter, to the maximum practical extent; b) The variance will not adversely impact receiving water quality or quantity; c) The variance will not adversely impact any functional attribute of the critical area; d) The variance will not jeopardize the continued existence of species listed by the Federal government or the State as endangered, threatened, sensitive, or documented priority species or priority habitats; and, e) The variance is based on the criteria and standards referenced in this chapter. 18.22.260 Reasonable economic use exceptions. 1) Permit applicants for a property so encumbered by critical areas or buffers that application of this chapter, including buffer averaging, buffer reduction, or other mechanism, would deny all 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 32/108 APPENDIX A reasonable economic use may seek approval pursuant to the reasonable economic use standards and procedures provided in this section. 2) Nothing in this chapter is intended to preclude all reasonable economic use of property. If the application of this chapter would deny all reasonable economic use of the subject property, including agricultural use, use or development shall be allowed if it is consistent with the zoning code and the purposes of this chapter. 3) To qualify as a reasonable economic use, the technical administrator or hearing examiner, as appropriate, must find that the proposal is consistent with all of the following criteria: a). There is no portion of the site where the provisions of this chapter allow reasonable economic use, including agricultural use or continuation of legal nonconforming uses; b) There is no feasible alternative to the proposed activities that will provide reasonable economic use with less adverse impact on critical areas or buffers; c) Activities will be located as far as possible from critical areas and the project employs all reasonable methods to avoid adverse effects on critical area functions and values, including maintaining existing vegetation, topography, and hydrology. Where both critical areas and buffer areas are located on a parcel, buffer areas shall be disturbed in preference to the critical area; c) The proposed activities will not result in adverse effects on endangered or threatened species as listed by the federal government or the state of Washington, or be inconsistent with an adopted recovery plan; d) Measures shall be taken to ensure the proposed activities will not cause degradation of groundwater or surface water quality, or adversely affect drinking water supply; e)The proposed activities comply with all state, local and federal laws, including those related to erosion and sediment control, pollution control, floodplain restrictions, and on-site wastewater disposal; f) The proposed activities will not cause damage to other properties; g) The proposed activities will not increase risk to the health or safety of people on or off the site; h) The inability to derive reasonable economic use of the property is not the result of segregating or dividing the property or creating the condition of lack of use; and, i) The project includes mitigation for unavoidable critical area and buffer impacts in accordance with the mitigation requirements of this chapter. 18.22.270 Physical separation — Functional isolation. 1) Exclusion for Functionally Isolated Critical Areas Buffers. Subject to the limitations in subsection (2), critical areas buffers that are both physically separated and functionally isolated from a critical area and do not protect the critical area from adverse impacts shall be excluded 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 33/108 APPENDIX A from critical area buffers otherwise required by this chapter. Functional isolation can occur due to existing public roads, structures, vertical separating, or any other relevant physical characteristic. 2) Limitations on Functional Isolation. a) Functional isolation shall be limited to wetland buffers and fish and wildlife habitat conservation area buffers only. b) Functional isolation shall not be used in geologically hazardous areas, critical aquifer recharge areas or frequently flooded areas. 3) Special Report May be Required. The administrator may require a special report to determine whether a critical area buffer is functionally isolated. 18.22.280 Adaptive Management. Adaptive management relies on scientific methods to evaluate how well regulatory and nonregulatory actions achieve their objectives and adjusts those programs. Management, policy, and regulatory actions are treated as experiments that are purposefully monitored and evaluated to determine whether they are effective and, if not, how they should be improved to increase their effectiveness. An adaptive management program is a formal and deliberate scientific approach to taking action and obtaining information in the face of uncertainty. To effectively implement an adaptive management program, Jefferson County, in support of this chapter will: 1) Address funding for the research component of the adaptive management program; 2) Change course based on the results and interpretation of new information that resolves uncertainties; and, 3) Commit to the appropriate time frame and scale necessary to reliably evaluate regulatory and nonregulatory actions affecting critical areas protection and anadromous fisheries. Article III. Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas 18.22.300 Purpose Potable water is an essential life-sustaining element for humans and many other species. Much of Jefferson County's drinking water comes from groundwater supplies. Critical aquifer recharge areas are important to ensure the quality and quantity of groundwater in aquifers. Preventing contamination from land uses that may contaminate groundwater is necessary to protect water supplies and avoid exorbitant costs, hardships and physical harm to people and ecosystems. It is the purpose of this article to identify and classify aquifer recharge areas in accordance with WAC 365-190-100 and balance competing needs for land uses, clean water supplies and preserve essential natural functions and processes, especially for maintaining critical fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas. 18.22.310 Classification/designation. Critical aquifer recharge areas are areas with a critical recharging effect on aquifers used for potable water, including areas where an aquifer that is a source of drinking water is vulnerable to 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 34/108 APPENDIX A contamination that would affect the potability of the water, or is susceptible to reduced recharge. Critical areas aquifer recharge area maps shall be periodically revised, modified, and updated to reflect current information. The following classifications define critical aquifer recharge areas: 1) Susceptible aquifer recharge areas. Susceptible aquifer recharge areas are those with geologic and hydrologic conditions that promote rapid infiltration of recharge waters to groundwater aquifers. For the purposes of this article, unless otherwise determined by preparation of an aquifer recharge area report authorized under this article, the following geologic units, as identified from available Washington Department of Natural Resources geologic mapping, define susceptible aquifer recharge areas for east Jefferson County: a) Aluvial fans (Ha); b) Artificial fill (Hx); c) Beach sand and gravel (Hb); d) Dune sand (Hd); e) Floodplain alluvium (Hf); f) Vashon recessional outwash in deltas and alluvial fans (Vrd); g) Vashon recessional outwash in melt water channels (Vro); h) Vashon ice contact stratified drift (Vi); i) Vashon ablation till (Vat); j) Vashon advance outwash (Vao); k)Whidbey formation (Pw); and, I) Pre-Vashon stratified drift (Py). 2) Special Aquifer Recharge Protection Areas. Special aquifer recharge protection areas include: a) Sole-source aquifers designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in accordance with the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5300f et seq.), such as Marrowstone Island; b) Special protection areas designated by the Washington Department of Ecology under Chapter 173-200 WAC; c) Wellhead protection areas determined in accordance with delineation methodologies specified by the Washington Department of Health under authority of Chapter 246-290 WAC; d) Groundwater management areas designated by the Washington Department of Ecology in cooperation with local government under Chapter 173-100 WAC. 3) Seawater Intrusion Protection Zones (SIPZ). 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 35/108 APPENDIX A a) Seawater intrusion protection zones are: i) Aquifers and land overlying aquifers with some degree of vulnerability to seawater intrusion. SIPZ are defined either by proximity to marine shoreline or by proximity to groundwater sources that have demonstrated high chloride readings. ii) All islands and land area within one-quarter mile of marine shorelines and associated aquifers together compose the coastal SIPZ. b) High Risk SIPZ. i) Existing individual groundwater sources with a history of chloride analyses above 200 mg/L are categorized as a high risk SIPZ for development proposed under this code. ii) Areas within 1,000 feet of a groundwater source with a history of chloride analyses above 200 milligrams per liter(mg/L) are categorized as a high risk SIPZ for development proposed under this code. c) At Risk SIPZ. Areas within 1,000 feet of a groundwater source with a history of chloride analyses above 100 milligrams per liter(mg/L)are categorized as at risk SIPZ for development proposed under this code. d) Connate Seawater Exception. In some cases, high chloride readings may be indicative of connate seawater(i.e., relic seawater in aquifers as opposed to active seawater intrusion). When best available science or a hydrogeologic evaluation demonstrates that high chloride readings in a particular area are due to connate seawater, the area in question shall not be considered an at risk or high risk SIPZ. c) Recommendation from Public Health Department. When the status of an area as either a high risk or an at risk SIPZ is in question, the administrator is responsible for making the determination based upon recommendation from the Jefferson County Department of Public Health. 18.22.320 Applicability. This article applies to any development within critical aquifer recharge areas, unless the proposed activity meets any of the exemptions listed in JCC 18.22.230. 2) Other Activities. The following activities, when proposed in a critical aquifer recharge area shall be subject to the protection standards in this article: a) All industrial and commercial land uses with the potential to impact groundwater; b) The following rural residential land uses: i)Those using a locally managed community sewage system; ii)Those using a large on-site sewage system meeting the management requirements of the Washington Department of Health; and, iii) All planned rural residential developments. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 36/108 APPENDIX A 18.22.330 Protection standards. The following protection standards shall apply to activities; provided, the activity is not prohibited in JCC 18.22.320. 1) Critical Area Aquifer Recharge High Impact Activities. a) High Impact Activities Listed. The activities listed in Table 18.22.330(1) high impact activities due to the probability or potential magnitude of their adverse effects on groundwater. Table 18.22.330(1)—Critical Area Aquifer Recharge High Impact Activities Critical Area Aquifer Recharge High Impact activates Chemical manufacturing and reprocessing Creosote/asphalt manufacturing or treatment (except that asphalt batch plants may be permitted in susceptible aquifer recharge areas only if such areas lie outside of special aquifer recharge protection areas and only if best management practices are implemented pursuant to JCC 18.20.240 (2)(h)(iv) and JCC 18.30.170(1) and an accepted aquifer recharge area report) Dry Cleaners Electrical battery processing, reprocessing or storage Electroplating and metal coating activities Hazardous substance disposal, storage, and treatment facilities Junk and Salvage Yards Landfills Petroleum product refinement and reprocessing Pipelines Radioactive disposal or processing of radioactive wastes Recycling centers or recycling collection facilities as defined in JCC 18.10.180 Storage tanks (above or below ground)for hazardous substances or petroleum products Waste piles as defined in WAC 173-303-660 Wood and wood products preserving b) High Impact Activities Prohibited in Areas Classified as Both a Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area and a Special Aquifer Recharge Protection Area. High impact activities shall be prohibited in areas that are classified as both a susceptible aquifer recharge area and a special aquifer recharge protection area. c) High Impact Activities Proposed in Areas Classified Solely as a Susceptible Aquifer Recharge Area Require a Critical Aquifer Recharge Report. When high impact activities are proposed for a susceptible aquifer recharge area, a critical aquifer recharge report that meets all the requirements of JCC 18.22.930 shall be submitted to the department for review. d) High Impact Activities Proposed in Areas Classified Solely as a Special Aquifer Recharge Protection Area Require an Aquifer Recharge Area Report. When high impact activities are proposed for a special aquifer recharge protection area, a critical aquifer recharge report that meets all the requirements of JCC 18.22.930 shall be submitted to the department for review. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 37/108 APPENDIX A 2) Seawater Intrusion Protection Zones. New development, redevelopment, and activities on islands and in close proximity to marine shorelines where there is a risk or a high risk of seawater intrusion should be developed in such a manner to maximize aquifer recharge, maintain the saltwater/freshwater balance to the maximum extent possible, and are subject to the antidegradation policy in accordance with WAC 173-200-030 (Antidegradation Policy). 3) Stormwater Disposal. a) Stormwater runoff shall be controlled and treated in accordance with best management practices and facility design standards as identified and defined in the current Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington and the stormwater provisions contained in Chapter 18.30 JCC. To the extent practicable, stormwater should be managed in a way that facilitates aquifer recharge. b) To help prevent seawater from intruding landward into aquifers, all new development activity on Marrowstone Island and within one-quarter mile of any marine shoreline shall be required to infiltrate all stormwater runoff on site, except for those areas within the Port Ludlow Drainage District. The administrator will consider requests for exceptions to this policy on a case-by-case basis; provided a critical area recharge report that complies with all the requirements of JCC 18.22.930 demonstrates the project does not pose a threat of seawater intruding landward into aquifers. 4) Golf Courses and Other Turf Cultivation. a)Golf courses shall be developed and operated in a manner consistent with the most current edition of "Best Management Practices for Golf Course Development and Operation," King County department of development and environmental services. b) Recreational and institutional facilities (e.g., parks and schools) with extensive areas of cultivated turf shall be operated in a manner consistent with portions of the aforementioned best management practices pertaining to fertilizer and pesticide use, storage, and disposal. In seawater intrusion protection zones, golf courses and other turf cultivation using groundwater for irrigation shall be prohibited, unless the water source is located outside of seawater intrusion protection zones or in an approved public water supply. 5) Above-Ground Storage and Underground Storage Tanks. a) Above-ground and underground storage tanks shall be fabricated, constructed, installed, used and operated in a manner which prevents the release of hazardous substances to the ground or groundwater and be consistent with the Washington Department of Ecology's standards for construction and installation under Chapter 173-360A WAC. b) Above-ground storage tanks intended to hold or store hazardous substances shall be provided with an impervious containment system, enclosing and underlying the tank; or, ensure that other measures are undertaken as prescribed by the Uniform Fire Code which provide an equivalent measure of protection. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 38/108 APPENDIX A c) Underground storage tanks intended to store hazardous substances shall provide an impervious tertiary containment system underlying the tanks or ensure that other measures are undertaken which provide an equivalent measure of protection. d) When required under this section, an impervious containment system must be durable, compatible with the substance it is meant to contain, and large enough to contain a volume equal to 10 percent of all containers, or 110 percent of the largest single container, whichever is greater. 6) Mining and Quarrying. For mining and quarrying, required performance standards with groundwater protection best management practices pertaining to operation, closure, and the operation of gravel screening, gravel crushing, cement concrete batch plants, and asphalt concrete batch plants, where allowed, are contained in Chapters 18.20 and 18.30 JCC. 7) Hazardous Substances. Activities that generate, handle, store, or hazardous substances, which are not prohibited outright under this code, and which are conditionally exempt from regulation by the Washington Department of Ecology under WAC 173-303-100 (Dangerous Waste Criteria), or which generate, handle, store or use hazardous substances, shall be required to prepare and submit a hazardous substances management plan that demonstrates that the development will not have an adverse impact on groundwater quality. The hazardous substances management plan shall describe the following: a) How hazardous substance(s) will be managed in a manner consistent with Chapter 8.10 JCC and Chapter 173-303 WAC; b) Screening of any waste suspected of being a regulated dangerous waste as defined in JCC 8.10.100; c) Requirements for labeling of containers holding hazardous substances with the name of the hazardous substance(s) and the applicable Material Safety Data Sheets; and, d) The secondary containment system to be used to prevent releases of hazardous substances to the ground, groundwater, and surface water. The facility owner must update the hazardous materials management plan annually and provide the updated plan to the department on or before the next January 1st, after the plan is updated. 8) Well Drilling, Subdivisions, and Building Permits in Seawater Intrusion Protection Zones S I PZ). a) Well Drilling. The Washington Department of Ecology regulates well drilling pursuant to the Water Well Construction Act. Proposed wells, including those exempt from permitting requirements, must be sited at least 100 feet from "known or potential sources of contamination," which include "sea-salt water intrusion areas" (WAC 173-160-171), unless a variance is obtained from the Washington Department of Ecology per WAC 173-160-106. b) Subdivisions. Applications for land division (Chapter 18.35 JCC) in coastal, at risk, and high risk SIPZ must include specific and conclusive proof of adequate supplies of potable water and the applicant must provide a special report that satisfies all the requirements or a 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 39/108 APPENDIX A hydrogeologic evaluation contained in JCC 18.22.930(2)(b) that demonstrates that the creation of new lots and corresponding use of water will not cause degradation of the in the aquifer by seawater intrusion. A hydrogeologic evaluation shall not be required when the applicant demonstrates that public water is available for the entire project. c) Marrowstone Island. Due to documented seawater intrusion on Marrowstone Island and the existence of undeveloped lots of record, the department, in consultation with Jefferson County Environmental Public Health will only allow land division on the island if public water connections are provided to each lot of a proposed project and all existing wells within the project site are decommissioned. No permit shall be approved if a public water connection to each lot of a proposed project cannot be provided. d) Building Permits. i) Evidence of potable water may be an individual well, connection to a public water system, or an alternative system. Whatever method is selected, the regulatory and operational standards for that method must be met and the department will work in consultation with the Jefferson County Public Health Department identification of well interference problems and impairment to senior rights is the responsibility of the Washington Department of Ecology. If the possibility of a problem is suspected, the local permitting authority should contact the Washington Department of Ecology, as required by RCW 19.27.097. ii) All types of building permits that require proof of potable water use, as per RCW 19.27.097, are subject to this article. e) Voluntary and mandatory measures of the Jefferson County seawater intrusion policy apply to applications within the coastal, at risk, and high risk SIPZ, and upon Marrowstone Island, in the following manner, in addition to all existing applicable health codes: i) Coastal SIPZ. A) Voluntary Actions. Voluntary actions may include but are not limited to: I)Water conservation measures; II) Ongoing well monitoring for chloride concentration; and, III) Submittal of data to the county. B) Mandatory Actions. I) For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize DOH-approved public water system if available; II) If public water is unavailable, meaning the subject property is not within a current water service area, an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirements: 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 40/108 APPENDIX A 1. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application; and, 2. Installation of source-totalizing meter(flow). III) If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. ii)At Risk SIPZ. A) Voluntary Actions. I) Water conservation measures. B) Mandatory Actions. I) For proof of potable water on a building permit application, the applicant must utilize a Washington Department of Health-approved public water system if available; II) If public water is unavailable, meaning the subject property is not within a current water service area, an individual well may be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirements: 1. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application; 2. Installation of a source-totalizing meter (flow); and, III) If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. iii) High Risk SIPZ. A) Mandatory Actions. I)Water conservation measures; II) For proof of potable water on a building permit application, applicant must utilize a Washington Department of Health -approved public water system if available; III) If public water is unavailable, meaning the subject property is not within a current water service area, an individual well may only be used as proof of potable water subject to the following requirements: 1. Variance from the Title 173 WAC standards granted by the Washington Department of Ecology per WAC 173-160-106 for a new groundwater well within 100 feet of a sea-salt water intrusion area per WAC 173-160-171 (i.e., within 100 feet of a groundwater source showing chloride concentrations above 200 mg/L or within 100 feet of the marine shoreline) and with the submittal of a hydrogeologic evaluation that satisfies all the requirements or a hydrogeologic evaluation contained in JCC 18.22.930(2)(b); 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 41/108 APPENDIX A 2. For an existing groundwater well not subject to a Washington Department of Ecology variance, the applicant must provide a hydrogeologic evaluation that satisfies all the requirements or a hydrogeologic evaluation contained in JCC 18.22.930(2)(b), which shall be transmitted to the Washington Department of Ecology for review, demonstrating that use of the well does not cause any detrimental interference with existing water rights and is not detrimental to the public interest; 3. Chloride concentration of a laboratory-certified well water sample submitted with building permit application; 4. If chloride concentration exceeds 250 mg/L in a water sample submitted for a building permit, then the property owner shall be required to record a restrictive covenant that indicates a chloride reading exceeded the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency secondary standard (250 mg/L) under the National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations; 5. Installation of a source-totalizing meter flow; 6. Ongoing well monitoring for chloride concentration; and, 7. Submittal of flow and chloride data to the county per monitoring program; and, IV) If public water is unavailable, a qualifying alternative system may be used as proof of potable water. iv) Marrowstone Island. Since Marrowstone Island is a sole source aquifer and a high risk SIPZ, and the island is served by public water, proof of potable water connection to the public water supply will be required for all lots in the project. 9) Mitigating Conditions. The administrator may require additional mitigating conditions, as needed to provide protection to all critical aquifer recharge areas and to ensure that the subject land or water use action will not pose a risk of significant adverse groundwater quality impacts. The determination of significant adverse groundwater quality impacts will be based on the anti degradation policy included in Chapter 173-200 WAC. 10) Results of Department's Review of a Critical Area Recharge Report, a Hydrogeologic Evaluation or a Hazardous Substances Management Plan. The department shall review a critical area recharge report, a hydrogeologic evaluation or a hazardous substances management plan and either: a) Accept the critical area recharge report, the hydrogeologic evaluation or the hazardous substances management plan and approve the application; or, b) Reject the critical area recharge report, the hydrogeologic evaluation or the hazardous substances management plan and require revisions or additional information. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 42/108 APPENDIX A 11)Authority for Denial. In all critical aquifer recharge areas,the administrator may deny approval if the protection standards contained in this section or added mitigating conditions cannot prevent significant adverse groundwater quality impacts. Article IV. Frequently Flooded Areas 18.22.400 Purpose The purpose of this article is to protect the public health, safety and welfare from harm caused by flooding and to establish protection standards for these areas. It is the intent of this article to prevent damage or loss to both public and private property. 18.22.410 Classification/designation. Frequently flooded areas are lands in the floodplain subject to at least a one percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year, or within areas subject to flooding due to high groundwater. These areas include, but are not limited to, streams, rivers, lakes, coastal areas, wetlands, and areas where high groundwater forms ponds on the ground surface. Frequently flooded areas perform important hydrologic functions and may present a risk to persons and property. Flood hazard areas are depicted on the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Federal Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs). FIRMs display areas of concern including areas that fall within the 100-year flood plain designations of the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the National Flood Insurance Program. 18.22.420 Applicability. These standards apply to any development within frequently flooded areas, unless the proposed activity meets any of the exemptions listed in Chapter 15.15 JCC. The flood damage prevention ordinance (Chapter 15.15 JCC) conforms with the intent of the minimum guidelines (WAC 365- 190-110(1)) through directly considering the effects of flooding on human health and safety, together with effects on public facilities and services, through its protection standards. For purposes of this article, development is defined as any man-made change to improved or unimproved real estate, including but not limited to buildings or other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation or drilling operations, storage of equipment or materials, subdivision of land, removal of more than five percent of the native vegetation on the property, or alteration of natural site characteristics. 18.22.430 Protection standards - Incorporation by reference of Chapter 15.15 JCC and additional requirements. This article incorporates by reference the classification, designation and protection provisions contained in the Jefferson County flood damage prevention ordinance (Chapter 15.15 JCC) with the following additions: 1) Compliance with FIRMs. The FIRMs identified in the flood damage prevention ordinance Chapter 15.15 JCC) shall be used to determine flood hazard areas for compliance with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regulatory requirements. Such flood hazard areas shall be subject to the criteria of the flood damage prevention ordinance (Chapter 15.15 JCC). 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 43/108 APPENDIX A 3) Compliance with National Marine Fisheries Service Biological Opinion. Development proposed within regulated frequently flooded areas and floodplains shall ensure no impacts to listed fish and wildlife habitat as required by the National Marine Fisheries Service NMFS) September 22, 2008 final Biological Opinion (BiOp) under the Endangered Species Act ESA) on the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) in Puget Sound (NMFS Tracking No.: 2006-00472 (or as amended by NMFS). 4) Habitat Assessment Requirements. a)A habitat assessment that meets all the requirements of JCC 18.22.940 shall be submitted to the department for review if any portion of the proposed project occurs within a Special Flood Hazard Area (floodplain), as mapped by the Federal Emergency Management Agency FEMA). b) The administrator may request federal assistance in reviewing the submitted habitat assessment. c) The administrator may waive the requirement to submit a habitat assessment only if: i)The entire proposal meets one of the exemptions listed in Chapter 15.15 JCC and does not require a state hydraulic permit; ii)The proposal requires a federal permit that is reviewed by federal agencies responsible for ensuring compliance with the Endangered Species Act (this could include, but is not limited to, project actions covered by separate consultation under Section 4(d), 7, or 10 of the Endangered Species Act); iii) A habitat assessment previously has been prepared and the proposed project clearly fits within the nature and scope of that habitat assessment; or, iv) If FEMA approves an alternate process for Jefferson County to demonstrate compliance with the Biological Opinion (such as a programmatic review), this department may waive the requirement to submit a habitat assessment. Article V. Geologically Hazardous Areas 18.22.500 Purpose. The purpose of this article is to reduce risks to human life and safety and reduce the risk of damage to structures and property from geologic hazards, to allow for natural geologic processes supportive of forming and maintaining fish and wildlife habitat, and to regulate and inform land use and planning decisions. It is recognized that the elimination of all risk from geologic hazards is not feasible to achieve but the purpose of this article is to reduce the risk to acceptable levels. 18.22.510 Classification/designation. Geologically hazardous areas are areas that because of their susceptibility to erosion, sliding, earthquake, or other geological events, are not suited to siting commercial, residential, or industrial development consistent with public health or safety concerns. Unless specifically noted below, principal sources of geologically hazardous areas mapped information are the Washington 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 44/108 APPENDIX A Department of Natural Resources Geologic Hazard Maps (https://www.dnr.wa.gov/programs- and-services/geologv/geologic-hazards/geologic-hazard-maps). 1) The following are geologically hazardous areas and subject to the standards of this article when mapped as high or moderate geologically hazardous areas: a) Erosion Hazard Areas (as defined in JCC 18.10.50). b) Landslide Hazard Areas (as defined in JCC 18.10.120). Landslide hazard areas include any areas susceptible to landslide because of any combination of bedrock, soil, slope gradient), slope aspect, structure, hydrology, or other factors, as follows: i) Areas of historic failures, such as: A) Areas delineated by United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service as having a significant limitation for building site development; B) Coastal areas mapped by the Washington Department of Ecology Coastal Atlas as unstable, unstable old slides, and unstable recent slides in; or, C) Areas designated and mapped as quaternary slumps, earthflows, mudflows, lahars, or landslide hazards by the Washington Department of Natural Resources or the United States Geological Survey. ii) Areas where all three of the following conditions occur: A) Slopes are steeper than 15 percent; B) Hillsides intersecting geologic contacts with a relatively permeable sediment overlying a relatively impermeable sediment or bedrock; and, C) Spring or groundwater seepage. iii)Areas that have shown movement during the Holocene epoch (from 10,000 years ago to present) or have been underlain or covered by mass wastage debris of this epoch. iv) Areas with slopes that are parallel or subparallel to planes of weakness (such as bedding planes, joint systems, and fault planes) in subsurface materials. v) Areas with slopes having gradients steeper than 80 percent subject to rockfall during seismic shaking. vi) Areas that are potentially unstable as a result of rapid stream incision, stream bank erosion, and undercutting by wave action, including stream channel migration zones. vii) Areas that show evidence of, or are at risk from, snow avalanches. viii)Areas located in a canyon or on an active alluvial fan, presently or potentially subject to inundation by debris flows or catastrophic flooding. ix)Areas with a slope of 40 percent or steeper and with a vertical relief of 10 or more feet, except areas composed of bedrock. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 45/108 APPENDIX A c) Seismic Hazard Areas (as defined in JCC 18.10.190). d) Channel Migration Zones (CMZs) (as defined in JCC.18.10.030). d) Seiche and Landslide Generated Wave Hazard Areas (as defined in JCC 18.10.190). e) Tsunami Hazard Areas (as defined in JCC 18.10.200). f) Other geologic events, such as coal mine hazards and volcanic hazards are not a known risk in Jefferson County, and are therefore, not subject to review as part of the permitting process. 18.22.520 Regulated activities. 1) Any development activity or action requiring a project permit or any clearing within an erosion or landslide area shall: a) Comply with the requirements in an approved geotechnical report when one is required, including application of the largest buffer or building setback; b) Utilize best management practices (BMPs) and all known and available technology appropriate for compliance with this chapter and typical of industry standards; c) Prevent collection, concentration or discharge of storm water or groundwater within an erosion or landslide hazard area and be in compliance with JCC 18.30.070 (Storm Water Management Standards); and, d) Minimize impervious surfaces and retain vegetation to minimize risk of erosion or landslide hazards. 2) Any development activity or action requiring a project permit or any clearing within an erosion or landslide area shall not: a) Result in increased risk of property damage, death or injury; b) Cause or increase erosion or landslide hazard risk; c) Increase surface water discharge, sedimentation, slope instability, erosion or landslide potential to adjacent downstream and down-drift properties beyond predevelopment conditions; d) Adversely impact wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas or their buffers; or, 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 46/108 APPENDIX A e) Be identified as a critical facility necessary to protect public health, safety and welfare. This includes, but is not limited to, schools, hospitals, police stations, fire departments and other emergency response facilities, nursing homes, and hazardous material storage or production. 18.22.530 Protection standards. 1) Clearing, Grading and Vegetation Removal. a) Minor pruning of vegetation for view enhancement may be allowed through consultation with the department. The thinning of limbs on individual trees is preferred to topping of trees for view corridors. Total buffer thinning shall not exceed twenty-five percent and no more than thirty percent of the live tree crowns shall be removed. b) Vegetation shall not be removed from a landslide hazard area, except for hazardous trees based on review by a qualified arborist or as otherwise provided for in a vegetation management and restoration plan. c) Seasonal Restrictions. Clearing and grading shall be limited to the period between May 1st and October 1st, unless the applicant provides an erosion and sedimentation control plan prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the state of Washington that specifically and realistically identifies methods of erosion control for wet weather conditions. d) Only the clearing necessary to install temporary erosion control measures will be allowed prior to clearing for roads and utilities construction. e) The faces of cut and fill slopes shall be protected to prevent erosion as required by the engineered erosion and sedimentation control plan. f) Clearing for roads and utilities shall be the minimum necessary and shall remain within marked construction limits. g) Clearing for overhead power lines shall be the minimum necessary for construction and will provide the required minimum clearances for the serving utility corridor. 2) Existing Logging Roads. Where existing logging roads occur in geologically hazardous areas, a geological assessment may be required prior to use as a temporary haul road or permanent access road under a conversion or COHP forest practices application. 3) The department may also require: 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 47/108 APPENDIX A a) Clustering to increase protection to geologically hazardous areas; or b) Enhancement of buffer vegetation to increase protection to geologically hazardous areas. 4) The provisions in this section are in addition to those required in JCC 18.30.060 (grading and excavation standards) and JCC 18.30.070 (stormwater management standards). 5) If there is a conflict between applicable published standards, the more restrictive protection requirement applies. 6) Drainage and Erosion Control. a) An applicant submitting a project application shall also submit, and have approved, a, a stormwater site plan that meets all the requirements of JCC 18.30.070(4)(e), when the project application involves either of the following: i) The alteration of a high or moderately high geologically hazardous area or its critical area buffer; or, ii) The creation of a new parcel within a high or moderately high geologically hazardous area; and, b) Shall discuss, evaluate, and recommend methods to minimize sedimentation of adjacent properties during and after construction. c) Surface drainage shall not be directed across the face of a marine bluff that is mapped as high or moderate erodible or susceptible to landslide or debris flow. The applicant must demonstrate that the stormwater discharge cannot be accommodated on site or upland by evidence presented in a geological assessment as required by JCC 18.22.945, unless waived by the administrator. If drainage must be discharged from a bluff to adjacent waters, it shall be collected above the face of the bluff and directed to the water by tight line drain and provided with an energy dissipating device at the shoreline, above ordinary high-water mark OHWM). d) The applicant must clearly demonstrate in the geological assessment that stormwater quantity, quality, and flow path post-construction will be comparable to pre-construction conditions. 7) Vegetation Retention. The following provisions regarding vegetation retention shall apply: a) During clearing for roadways and utilities, all trees and understory vegetation lying outside of approved construction limits shall be retained to the maximum extent practicable; b) Clearing limits, as shown on the approved site plan, shall be marked by orange construction barrier fencing to be installed prior to beginning any clearing, grading, or other land-disturbing activities; 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 48/108 APPENDIX A c) Vegetation within identified clearing limits may be removed upon permit issuance. All vegetation within the high or moderate geologically hazardous area or its critical area buffer, but outside the marked clearing limits, shall be retained. Cleared vegetation shall not be placed within a high or moderate geologically hazardous area unless it is used as part of a mitigation plan consistent with other critical area mitigation provisions, is reviewed by the geotechnical professional, and is approved by the administrator; and, iv) Within a high risk CMZ, vegetation removal shall not be allowed. Vegetation removal outside of a high risk CMZ shall not be reviewed under this article. Should this provision conflict with other vegetation retention requirements specified elsewhere within the Title 18 JCC, the more restrictive protection requirement applies. 8) Erosion and Landslide Hazard Development Standards. a) Development activities or actions requiring project permits or clearing shall not be allowed in landslide hazard areas unless a geotechnical report demonstrates that building within a landslide hazard area will provide protection commensurate to being located outside the landslide hazard area and meets the requirements of this section. This may include proposed mitigation measures. b) Top of Slope Building Setback. All development activities or actions that require project permits or clearing in erosion and landslide hazard areas shall provide native vegetation from the toe of the slope to twenty-five feet beyond the top of slope, with an additional minimum fifteen-foot building and impervious surface setback, unless otherwise allowed through a geologic assessment. The minimum building and setback shall be increased from the top of the slope as follows: i) For high landslide hazard areas, the setback shall be equal to the height of the slope 1:1 horizontal to vertical) plus the greater of one-third of the vertical slope height or twenty-five feet. ii) For moderate landslide hazard areas, the setback shall be forty feet from the top of slope. 9) Geotechnical Report for Toe of Slope Building Setback may be required. A geotechnical report may be required based on slope height and stability indicators. 10) Larger Native Vegetation Width may be Required. The department may require a larger native vegetation width than the standard buffer distance as determined above, if any of the following are identified through the geological assessment process: 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 49/108 APPENDIX A a) The adjacent land is susceptible to severe erosion and erosion control measures will not effectively prevent adverse impacts; b) The area has a severe risk of slope failure or downslope storm water drainage impacts; or, c) The minimum native vegetation width or building setback requirement may be decreased if a geotechnical report demonstrates that a lesser distance, through design and engineering solutions, will adequately protect both the proposed development and the erosion or landslide hazard area. The department may decrease the setback when such a setback would result in a greater than 1:1 slope setback. 10) Seismic Hazard Development Standards. a) Development activities or actions requiring a project permit occurring within two hundred feet of a "high hazard" seismic hazard area may be allowed with an approved geotechnical report that confirms the site is suitable for the proposed development and addresses any fill or grading that has occurred on the subject parcel. b) Development activities or actions requiring a project permit within a seismic hazard area shall be in accordance with Title 15 JCC. 11) Reducing Buffer Widths. The administrator may reduce geologically hazardous area buffers as follows: a) Buffers may be reduced by up to 25 percent with a geotechnical report prepared by a geotechnical professional with a state stamp; provided, the geotechnical report identifies recommendations for preventing or minimizing risks post-development. b) All buffer reductions 25 percent or greater and all development within a high or moderate geologically hazardous area shall require a geotechnical report prepared by a geotechnical professional.The administrator may require a third-party review based on JCC 18.22.930 or the applicant enters into an indemnity and hold harmless agreement with the county that is approved by the county's risk manager and the prosecuting attorney. If the administrator requires a third-party review of the geotechnical report, the administrator shall be responsible for identifying and transmitting the geotechnical report to the third-party reviewer. 12) Increasing Buffer Widths. Buffer widths may be increased on a case-by-case basis, as determined by the administrator, to protect the functions and values of a geologically hazardous area and to reduce risks to public safety and welfare. Information that may be used to support this determination, include but are not limited to: a) The landslide area is unstable and active. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 50/108 APPENDIX A b) The adjacent land is susceptible to severe landslide or erosion, and erosion control measures will not effectively protect the proposed project from the risks posed by the landslide hazard area. c) The adjacent land has minimal vegetative cover. 14) Landslide hazard areas — Additional Standards. The following activities may be allowed in active landslide hazard areas when all reasonable measures have been taken to minimize risks and other adverse effects associated with landslide hazards, and when the amount and degree of the alteration are limited to the minimum needed to accomplish the project purpose: a) The standards of 18.22.530(1) shall apply. b) Developments that will not increase the threat to the health or safety of people and will not increase potential for landslides on or off the site and meet the reasonable economic use exception in JCC 18.22.260. c) Utility lines and pipes that are above ground, properly anchored or designed so that they will continue to function in the event of a slope failure or movement of the underlying materials and will not increase the risk or consequences of static or seismic slope instability or result in a risk of mass wasting. Such utility lines may be permitted only when the applicant demonstrates that no other feasible alternative is available to serve the affected population. d)Access roads and trails that are engineered and built to standards that minimize the need for major repair or reconstruction beyond that which would be required in nonhazard areas. Access roads and trails may be permitted only if the applicant demonstrates that no other feasible alternative exists, including through the provisions of Chapter 8.24 RCW. If such access through critical areas is granted, exceptions or deviations from technical standards for width or other dimensions and specific construction standards to minimize impacts, including drainage and drainage maintenance plans, may be required. e) Stormwater conveyance through a properly designed stormwater pipe when no other storm-water conveyance alternative is available. The pipe shall be located above ground and be properly anchored or designed so that it will continue to function in the event of a slope failure or movement of the underlying materials and will not increase the risk or consequences of static or seismic slope instability or result in increased risk of mass wasting activity. 15) Seismic hazard areas — Standards. Development may be allowed in seismic hazard areas when all of the following apply: a) The standards of JCC 18.22.530(1) shall apply. b) Structures in seismic hazard areas shall conform to applicable analysis and design criteria of Chapter 18.15.05 JCC. c) Public roads, bridges, utilities, and trails shall be allowed when there are no feasible alternative locations, and geotechnical analysis and design are provided that minimize 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 51/108 APPENDIX A potential damage to roadway, bridge, and utility structures, and facilities will not be susceptible to damage from seismically induced ground deformation. Mitigation measures shall be designed in accordance with the most recent version of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Manual or another appropriate document. 16) Tsunami hazard areas— Standards. a) The standards of JCC 18.22.530(1) shall apply. b) For development within tsunami hazard areas the proposed development shall be designed to provide protection from the tsunami hazard that meets the projected hazard on the Washington Department of Natural Resources Tsunami Inundation Maps. c) For other low-lying coastal areas not included on the inundation maps, development shall be designed to provide protection for debris impact and an inundation as determined by current Washington Department of Natural Resource modeling, unless other measures can be shown to provide equal or greater protection. 18.22.540 Required Assessments and Reports. 1) Map Review. The Jefferson County geologically hazardous areas maps (erosion, landslide, and seismic) provide an indication of where potential geologically hazardous areas are located within the county. The department will complete a review of the map to determine if the proposed activity is located within a hazard area. 2) When a Geological Assessment is Required. A geological assessment shall be required when the proposed activity is located within a potential hazard area. 3) Work must be Performed by a Geotechnical Professional. A geotechnical professional, as defined in JCC 18.10.070, shall complete a field investigation and geological assessment to determine whether or not the site for the proposed activity is affected by the geologic hazard, as provided in subsection (4) of this section. 4) Geological Assessment Types. The geological assessment shall be submitted in the most applicable form as follows: a) A geological letter. When the geotechnical professional finds that no moderate or high hazard area exists within two hundred feet of the site, a stamped letter may be submitted demonstrating those findings; b) A geological report. When the geotechnical professional finds that a moderate or high geologically hazardous area exists within two hundred feet of the site, but will not impact the site or need engineering design recommendations; 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 52/108 APPENDIX A c) A geotechnical report. When the geotechnical professional finds that a moderate or high geologically hazardous area exists within two hundred feet of the site, and will require engineering design recommendations or other mitigation measures necessary in order to construct or develop within the geologically hazardous area. 5) The department shall review the geological assessment and either: a) Accept the geological assessment and approve the application; or b) Reject the geological assessment and require revisions or additional information. 18.22 550 Recording and disclosure. The following information shall be included in a notice to title that must be signed, notarized, and recorded with the county auditor prior to permit issuance for development in a geologically hazardous area requiring a geotechnical report: 1) An abstract and description of the specific types of risks identified in the geotechnical report; 2) A statement that the owner(s) of the property understands and accepts the responsibility for the risks associated with developments on the property given the described condition, and agrees to inform future purchasers and other successors and assignees of the risks; and, 3) A statement that the owner(s) of the property acknowledge(s) that this chapter does not create liability on the part of Jefferson County or any officer or employee thereof for any damages that result from reliance on this chapter or any administrative decision lawfully made under this chapter. 4) Expiration of Geotechnical Reports. Unless there are documented significant changes, modifications, or other geologic events to render an existing geotechnical report invalid, an existing report shall be considered valid. Validity shall be examined upon submittal of proposed developments or every five years whichever is later. 5) Geologically Hazardous Areas — Marking Limits. The limits (or outer extent) of a geologically hazardous area shall be marked onsite as follows: a) High or Moderately High Geologically hazardous areas shall be identified and staked by a geotechnical professional. For landslide hazards, the top or toe of slope closest to the proposed activity shall be marked. For erosion hazards, seismic hazards, and high-risk channel migration zones, the extent of the geologically hazardous area closest to the proposed activity shall be staked onsite. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 53/108 APPENDIX A b) Stakes shall be installed and marked as necessary to clearly identify the geologically hazardous areas present; provided, the distance between each of the stakes shall not exceed 50 feet. c) Staked limits of the geologically hazardous area shall remain onsite based on the type of application, as follows: i) Stakes for building or septic applications shall remain in place until a final building certificate of occupancy for a building permit or a final for a septic permit is issued. ii) Staking for a subdivision, a planned rural residential development, a binding site plan, or a rezone shall remain in place until a final county approval is issued. If, at the time of subsequent building, septic, or other land use application, the stakes are no longer in place, the administrator may require re-staking of the geologically hazardous area by the project geotechnical professional. iii) Staking for any other application requiring land use review shall remain in place until the department of community development has made a site visit to review the staking relative to property boundaries and proposed activities, as shown on a submitted site plan. d) The staked location of the on-site geologically hazardous areas shall be shown on a site plan submitted with an application. e) If more than one geologically hazardous area is present, only the most restrictive geologically hazardous area (area closest to the proposed activity) shall be staked by the geotechnical professional. 4) Buffer Marking. The location of the outer extent of geologically hazardous area buffers shall be marked in the field as follows: a) Geologically hazardous areas and buffers shall be shown on a site plan submitted with an application. b)Geologically hazardous area buffers shall be staked onsite prior to beginning any clearing, grading, or other land-disturbing activities. The administrator may waive this requirement if all development activities are outside of the geologically hazardous area buffer. c) The administrator may require signs be posted at the buffer edge if the proposed activity is commercial or industrial, or if the proposed activity is proposed on public lands. Article VI. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (FWHCAs) 18.22.600 Purpose. The purposes of this article are to: 1) Protect, restore, and maintain native fish and wildlife populations by protecting and conserving fish and wildlife habitat and protecting the ecological processes, functions and values, and biodiversity that sustain these resources. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 54/108 APPENDIX A 2) Protect valuable aquatic and terrestrial habitats, including lakes, ponds, rivers, and streams and their associated riparian areas, corridors for state or federally listed species and the ecosystem processes on which these areas depend. 3) Regulate development so that isolated populations of species are not created and habitat degradation and fragmentation are minimized. 4) Maintain the natural geographic distribution, connectivity, and quality of fish and wildlife habitat and ensure no net loss of such important habitats, including net losses through cumulative impacts. 18.22.610 Classification/designation. Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (FWHCAs) are areas that serve a critical role in sustaining needed habitats and species for the functional integrity of the ecosystem, and which, if altered, may reduce the likelihood that the species will persist over the long term. FWHCAs include those areas identified as being of critical importance to the maintenance of endangered, threatened, or sensitive species of fish, wildlife or plants, or designated habitats and species of local importance. 1) The following are designated as fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas: a)Areas where federally listed species (endangered and threatened) and state-listed species endangered, threatened, and sensitive species) have a primary association. b) Rivers and streams not otherwise addressed under Washington State Forest Practices regulations (Chapter 76.09 RCW and Title 222 WAC). c) Commercial and recreational shellfish areas. d) Kelp and eelgrass beds. e) Surf smelt, Pacific herring, and Pacific sand lance, and other forage fish spawning areas. f) Naturally occurring ponds less than 20 acres, including submerged aquatic beds that provide fish and wildlife habitat. g) Lakes, ponds, streams, and rivers planted with game fish by a governmental or tribal entity. h)State natural area preserves, natural resource conservation areas, and state wildlife areas. i) Species and habitats of local importance designated pursuant to the process delineated in Article IX (Special Reports). 2) Designated fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas that are within shoreline jurisdiction are regulated under the shoreline master program in Chapter 18.25 JCC, and in circumstances where this chapter conflicts with the shoreline master program, the provisions of the shoreline master program shall prevail. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 55/108 APPENDIX A 18.22.620 Regulated activities. Any land use or development activity that is subject to a development permit or approval requirements of this code shall be subject to the provisions of this article. These include, but are not limited to, the following activities and, in certain circumstances, activity allowances, that are directly undertaken or originate in a FWHCA, unless otherwise exempted under JCC 18.22.230. 1) Stream Crossings. Any private or public road expansion or construction which is proposed and must cross streams classified within this article shall comply with the following minimum development standards: a) The design of stream crossings shall meet the requirements of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. Fish passage shall be provided if necessary to address manmade obstructions on-site. Other alternatives may be allowed upon a showing that, for the site under review, the alternatives would be less disruptive to the habitat or that the necessary building foundations were not feasible. b) Crossings shall not occur in salmonid spawning areas unless no other reasonable crossing site exists; c) Bridge piers or abutments may be allowed either within the floodway or between the ordinary high-water marks provided no other reasonable alternativeplacement exists; d) Crossings shall serve multiple properties whenever possible; and, e)Where there is no reasonable alternative to providing a culvert, the culvert shall be the minimum length necessary to accommodate the permitted activity. 2) Utilities. Placement of utilities within designated fish and wildlife habitat areas may be allowed pursuant to the following standards: a) Construction of utilities may be permitted in FWHCAs when no practicable or reasonable alternative location is available and the utility corridor does not cause or increase habitat fragmentation for state or federally listed species and meets the requirements for installation, replacement of vegetation and maintenance outlined below. Utilities are encouraged to follow existing or permitted roads where possible. b) Construction of sewer lines or on-site sewage systems may be permitted in FWHCA buffers when it can be demonstrated that it is necessary to meet state or local health code requirements; that there are no other practicable alternatives available; and, construction meets the requirements of this article. Joint use of the sewer utility corridor by other utilities may be allowed. c) New utility corridors shall not be allowed in FWHCAs with known locations of federal or state-listed endangered, threatened, or sensitive species, except in those circumstances where an approved habitat management plan is in place. d) Utility corridor construction and maintenance shall protect the environment of fish and wildlife habitat areas. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 56/108 APPENDIX A i) New utility corridors shall be aligned when possible to avoid cutting trees greater than 12 inches in diameter at breast height(four and one-half feet) measured on the uphill side. ii) New utility corridors shall be revegetated with appropriate native vegetation at not less than preconstruction vegetation densities or greater, immediately upon completion of construction or as soon thereafter as possible due to seasonal growing constraints. The utility shall ensure that such vegetation survives for a three-year period. e) Utility towers should be painted with brush, pad or roller and should not be sandblasted or spray-painted, nor shall lead-based paints be used. f) Utilities should follow best management practices for avian protection. 3) Bank Stabilization. a)A stream channel and bank, bluff, and shoreline may be stabilized when naturally occurring earth movement threatens existing legal structures, public improvements, unique natural resources, public health, safety or welfare, or the only feasible access to property, and, in the case of streams, when such stabilization results in maintenance of fish habitat or improved water quality, as demonstrated through a habitat management plan or equivalent study or assessment. b) Bluff, bank and shoreline stabilization shall follow the standards of the Jefferson County shoreline master program, geologically hazardous areas provision in this chapter, and the flood damage prevention ordinance. 4) Gravel Mining. 5) Forest Practices, Class IV General and Conversion Option Harvest Plans. 6) Road/Street Expansion and New Construction. Any private or public road or street expansion or construction may be allowed in a FWHCA provided it complies with the following minimum development standards: a) No other reasonable or practicable alternative exists and the proposed road or street serves multiple properties whenever possible; b) Public and private roads are encouraged to provide for other purposes, such as utility crossings, pedestrian, or bicycle easements, viewing points, etc.; and, c) The road or street construction is the minimum necessary, as required by the department of public works' guidelines. Minimum necessary provisions may include projected level of service requirements. 7) Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Trails Construction. Activities and improvements that do not significantly affect the function of the FWHCA (including viewing structures, outdoor scientific or interpretive facilities, trails, hunting blinds, etc.) may be permitted in FWHCAs. a) Trails and other facilities shall, to the extent feasible, be placed on existing road grades, utility corridors, or other previously disturbed areas; 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 57/108 APPENDIX A b) Trails and other facilities shall be planned to minimize removal of trees, shrubs, snags, and important wildlife habitat; c) Viewing platforms, interpretive centers, benches, and access to them, shall be designed and located to minimize impacts to wildlife, fish, or their habitat; or, d) Trails, in general, shall be set back from streams so that there will be minimal impact to the stream from trail use or maintenance. Trails shall be constructed with pervious surfaces when feasible and trails within FWHCAs are not intended to be used by motorized vehicles. 8) Chemical Application or Storage. 9) Land Division, Land Use Permits and Land Alteration (such as excavation, dredging, grading, or filling). 10) Modification of Hydrologic Regime or Conditions (including placement of obstructions or impediments to natural water flow or movement). 11)Agricultural Activities - see Article VIII 18.22.800 12) Vegetation Removal or Alteration (could include but is not limited to, clearing, harvesting, shading, intentional burning, use of herbicides/pesticides, or planting vegetation that alters the character of the regulated area; provided, the activity is not exempt under JCC 18.22.070). Minor pruning may be allowed provided it is consistent with JCC 18.22.530(1)(a) and (b). 13) Relocation of streams, or portions of streams, may be allowed when there is no other feasible alternative and when the relocation will result in equal or better habitat and water quality and quantity, and will not diminish the flow capacity of the stream or other natural stream processes; provided, the relocation meets state hydraulic project approval requirements and that relocation of shoreline streams shall be prohibited unless the relocation has been identified formally by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife as essential for fish and wildlife habitat enhancement or identified in watershed planning documents prepared and adopted pursuant to Chapter 90.82 RCW. 18.22.630 Protection standards. 1) General. Application for a project on a parcel of real property containing a designated FWHCA shall adhere to the requirements in this section. 2) Drainage and Erosion Control. In addition to complying with the stormwater requirements of Chapter 18.30 JCC, the applicant must clearly show that stormwater quantity, quality, and flow path post-construction will be comparable to pre-construction conditions. 3) Grading. An applicant submitting a project application shall also submit, and have approved, a grading plan, as specified in Chapter 18.30 JCC. 4) Vegetation Retention. The following provisions regarding vegetation retention shall apply: 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 58/108 APPENDIX A a) Vegetation within FHWCAs or buffers shall be retained to the extent practicable. Unless exempt under this chapter, vegetation removal or alteration of a FWHCA or a buffer shall require review and approval by the department. b)Altering the habitat conditions of FWHCAs or buffers without prior review and approval by the department is prohibited. c) All trees and understory vegetation lying outside of road rights-of-way and utility easements shall be retained (except for hazard trees) during maintenance clearing of rights- of-way for roadways and utilities; provided, understory vegetation damaged during approved clearing operations may be pruned. d) Damage to vegetation retained during initial clearing activities shall be minimized by directional felling of trees to avoid critical areas and vegetation to be retained. 5) Buffers—Standard Requirements. The administrator shall have the authority to require buffers from the edges of all FWHCAs in accordance with the following: a) Buffers Generally. i) Buffers shall be established for activities adjacent to FWHCAs as necessary to protect the integrity, functions, and values of the resource, consistent with the requirements in Tables 18.22.630(1) and 18.22.630(2) of this section. ii)A building setback line of 5 feet is required from the edge of any buffer area; however, nonstructural improvements such as septic drain fields may be located within setback areas and buffers. iii) Utilities including sewer lines and on-site sewage systems may be permitted in FWHCA buffers only when no practicable or reasonable alternative location is available. iii) Buffers shall be retained in their natural condition; however, minor pruning of vegetation to enhance views or provide access may be permitted as long as the function and character of the buffer are not diminished. iv) Lighting shall be directed away from the FWHCA. v) The administrator shall have the authority to increase a buffer width, if supported by appropriate documentation showing the increase is needed to protect the functions and values of the FWHCA. vi) The administrator shall require signs be posted at the buffer edge if the proposed activity is commercial or industrial, or if the activity is proposed on public lands. b) Prescriptive FWHCA Buffers. i) The standard buffer widths required by this article are considered to be the minimum required to protect the FWHCA/stream functions and values at the time of the proposed activity. When a buffer lacks adequate vegetation to protect critical area functions, the 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 59/108 APPENDIX A administrator may require additional documentation before allowing a proposal for buffer reduction or buffer averaging. ii) The standard buffer shall be measured landward horizontally on both sides of the stream from the ordinary high-water mark(OHWM)as identified in the field. Nevertheless, the required buffer shall include any adjacent regulated wetland(s), landslide hazard areas or erosion hazard areas and required buffers but shall not be extended across paved roads or other lawfully established structures or hardened surfaces. The following standard buffer width requirements are established; provided, portions of streams that flow underground may be exempt from these buffer standards at the administrator's discretion when it can be demonstrated that no adverse effects on aquatic species will occur. Table 18.22.630(1): Stream Buffers* Stream Type Buffer Requirement Type "S" —Shoreline Streams 150 feet Type "F" — Fish Bearing Streams 150 feet Type "Np"— Non-Fish Bearing 75 feet Perennial Streams Type "Ns" — Non-Fish Bearing 75 feet Seasonal Streams greater than or equal to 20% grade Type "Ns" — Non-Fish Bearing 50 feet Seasonal Streams less than 20% grade Note: a) The buffers above shall apply to culverted streams. b) The buffers above shall not apply to lawfully established piped streams. The burden of proof is on the applicant to show that the pipe was lawfully established; failure to demonstrate compliance with this requirement shall result in buffers being required. c) Stream type shall be determined using the criteria in WAC 222-16-030, or as amended iii) Buffers for Other FWHCAs. The administrator shall determine appropriate buffer widths for other FWHCAs based on the best available information. Buffer widths for nonstream habitat conservation areas shall be as follows: 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 60/108 APPENDIX A Table 18.22.630(2): Buffers for Other FWHCAs FWHCA Type Buffer Requirement Areas where federally listed Buffers shall be 150 feet; provided, local and site endangered and threatened) species or specific factors shall be taken into consideration and state-listed (endangered, threatened, the buffer width based on the best available and sensitive) species have a Primary information concerning the species/habitat(s) in Association question or the opinions and recommendations of a qualified professional with appropriate expertise. Commercial and Recreational Shellfish Buffers shall extend 150 feet landward from ordinary Areas high-water mark of the marine shore. Kelp and Eelgrass Beds Buffers apply to areas where native kelp and eelgrass species occur only, and buffers shall extend 22 feet from each patch. There is no buffer for non-native kelp and eelgrass beds. Surf Smelt, Pacific Herring, and Pacific Buffers shall extend 150 feet landward from ordinary Sand Lance Spawning Areas high-water mark of the marine shore. Natural Ponds and Lakes (along with Ponds under 20 acres—buffers shall extend 50 feet any submerged aquatic beds serving as from the ordinary high-water mark. fish or wildlife habitat) Lakes 20 acres and larger— buffers shall extend 100 feet from the ordinary high-water mark; provided, where wetlands are associated with the shoreline, the wetland buffer requirements shall also apply. Natural Area Preserves Natural Buffers shall not be required adjacent to these Resource Conservation Areas areas. These areas are assumed to encompass the land required for species preservation. Game Fish Planted by a Governmental Ponds under 20 acres—buffers shall extend 50 feet or Tribal Agency (lakes, ponds, streams, from the ordinary high-water mark. and rivers) Lakes 20 acres and larger— buffers shall extend 100 feet from the ordinary high-water mark; provided, where wetlands are associated with the shoreline, the wetland buffer requirements shall also apply. Stream and rivers—see Table 18.22.630(1). Designated Habitats of Local Importance The need for and dimensions of buffers for other locally important species or habitats shall be determined on a case-by-case basis. 18.22.640 Buffer Reductions and Averaging 1) The administrator shall have the authority to reduce buffer widths on a case-by-case basis; provided, the specific standards for avoidance and minimization in JCC 18.22.660 shall apply, and when the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the administrator that all of the following criteria are met: 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 61/108 APPENDIX A a) The buffer reduction shall not adversely affect the habitat functions and values of the adjacent FWHCA or other critical area. b) The buffer shall not be reduced to less than 75 percent of the standard buffer, unless it can be demonstrated through a special report prepared by a qualified professional that there will be no net loss of FWHCA functions or values. c)The slopes adjacent to the FWHCA within the buffer area are stable and the gradient does not exceed 30 percent. 2) The administrator shall have the authority to average buffer widths on a case-by case basis; provided, the specific standards for avoidance and minimization in JCC 18.22.660 shall apply, and when the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the administrator that all the following criteria are met: a)The total area contained in the buffer area after averaging is no less than that which would be contained within the standard buffer and all increases in buffer dimension are parallel to the FWHCA. b) The buffer averaging does not reduce the functions or values of the FWHCA or riparian habitat, or the buffer averaging, in conjunction with vegetation enhancement, increases the habitat function. c) The buffer averaging is necessary due to site constraints caused by existing physical characteristics such as slope, soils, or vegetation. d) The buffer width averaging does not reduce the buffer to less than 75 percent of the standard width or 50% for single family residential development. e)The slopes adjacent to the FWHCA within the buffer area are stable and the gradient does not exceed 30 percent. f) Buffer averaging shall not be allowed if FWHCA buffers are reduced. 3) The limits of clearing for the proposed development or use shall be shown on the site plan relative to the FWHCA and the buffer. 4) In the case of short plat, long plat, binding site plan, and site plan approvals under this code, the applicant shall include on the face of any such instrument the boundary of the FWHCA. 5) The applicant may also choose to dedicate the buffer through a conservation easement or deed restriction that shall be recorded with the Jefferson County auditor. Such easements or restrictions shall, however, use the forms approved by the prosecuting attorney. 18.22.650 Habitat management reports —When required. 1) When a development, use, or activity is proposed on lands designated as a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area or a buffer, a habitat evaluation may be required. An on-site habitat evaluation determines if FWHCAs or buffers occur in the project area. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 62/108 APPENDIX A 2) If the proposed use, development, or activity occurs in marine water, a dive survey shall be required to determine if any FWHCA is present in the project area and if any FWHCA has the potential to be affected by the proposal. 3) Evaluations shall be conducted pursuant to the special report requirements found in Article IX Special Reports. 4) Types of Reports. When required by this section, an applicant shall submit a report documenting the results of the habitat evaluation for county review and approval. Based on the results of the site evaluation, a report shall be prepared by a qualified professional and either be: a) Habitat Reconnaissance Letter. This type of report shall be used if the field evaluation determines that no regulated fish and wildlife habitat conservation area or buffer is present in the proposed project area, which includes those areas that may be temporarily affected by construction-related activities or would be within the limits of clearing for construction. Habitat reconnaissance letters shall be prepared by a wildlife biologist based on requirements presented in Article IX (special reports) of this chapter. b) Habitat Management Plan. This type of report shall be used if the field evaluation determines that any portion of the proposed project occurs within a regulated FWHCA or buffer, which includes those areas that may be temporarily affected by construction-related activities or would be within the limits of clearing for construction. This type of report shall be used if a proposed buffer reduction or buffer averaging does not exceed 25 percent of the standard buffer width, as shown in Tables 18.22.630(1) and (2). Habitat management plans shall be prepared by a wildlife biologist based on report requirements in Article IX (special reports) of this chapter. d) If the proposal cannot meet the mitigation or critical areas stewardship plan requirements of this chapter, a critical area variance or reasonable use exception in JCC 18.22.250 or JCC 18.22.260 shall be followed and a habitat management plan shall be required. An applicant may pursue a financially bonded critical area stewardship plan (CASP) as applicable under 18.22.965 provided, the proposal can meet all CASP financial and other provisions. d) If a dive survey is required, the results of the survey shall be described in a report and supported by photos taken underwater. 18.22.660 Mitigation 1)When required. Mitigation is required for FWHCA buffer reductions greater than 25% but less than 50% of the standard buffer widths. Applications for FWHCA buffer reductions greater than 50% may pursue a financially-bonded critical areas stewardship plan or be approved for buffer reductions greater than 50% through a hearing examiner variance or reasonable economic use exception in accordance with this chapter. All unavoidable impacts to FWHCA require mitigation. 2) FWHCA Mitigation Sequencing. The overall goal shall be no net loss of functions, natural processes, or area within a FWHCA or a FWHCA buffer. All regulated development, uses, and activities in a FWHCA or an associated buffer shall be mitigated in the following order: 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 63/108 APPENDIX A a) Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; b) Minimizing adverse impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation; c) Rectifying the adverse impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment to the historical condition or the condition existing at the time of the initiation of a project; d) Reducing or eliminating the adverse impact over time by preservation and maintenance operation during the life of the action; e) Compensating for the adverse impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments; f) Monitoring the required compensation and taking appropriate corrective measures when necessary. 3) Mitigation - Minimum requirements and types of mitigation. a) Minimum mitigation requirements are as follows: i) Unavoidable impacts to a FWHCA area or buffer shall be mitigated with at least a 1:1 mitigation ratio. The administrator has the authority to require buffer mitigation at a higher ratio if the area to be adversely affected consists of intact native habitat. ii) Unavoidable impacts to a FWHCA shall require mitigation that fully compensates for all adverse effects to FWHCA functions, natural processes, and area. b) FWHCAs mitigation shall include the following options: i) On-site Mitigation. The applicant may propose on-site mitigation if the mitigation proposal compensates for the loss or degradation to existing habitat. ii) Off-site Mitigation. The applicant may propose off-site mitigation if: A) On-site mitigation is not feasible and the mitigation proposal compensates for the loss or degradation of existing habitats and species; or, B) Off-site mitigation occurs within a connected habitat of a similar nature to the maximum extent practicable and provides better protection of the FWHCA or a significant ecological and functional improvement to the FWHCA; and, C) There is a willing landowner that accepts the proposed mitigation; and, D) A mitigation agreement/easement is recorded that specifies the individuals or parties responsible for implementing, maintaining, and monitoring the mitigation area. c) In-Lieu Fee Mitigation (ILF). As an alternative to permittee-responsible mitigation, an in-lieu fee program may be used to compensate for impacts or alterations to a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area or a buffer, if an established in-lieu fee program is available for the project area. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 64/108 APPENDIX A Use of the in-lieu fee program to address impacts to fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas or buffers shall adhere to the in-lieu mitigation requirements in JCC 18.22.350(5). Article VII. Wetlands 18.22.700 Purpose The purposes of this article are to: 1) Recognize and protect the beneficial functions, values, and services performed by wetlands, which include, but are not limited to, providing food, breeding, nesting or rearing habitat for fish and wildlife; recharging and discharging groundwater; contributing to stream flow during low flow periods; stabilizing stream banks and shorelines; storing storm and flood waters to reduce flooding and erosion; and, improving water quality through biofiltration, adsorption, retention and transformation of sediments, nutrients, and toxicants. 2). Regulate land use to avoid adverse effects on wetlands and maintain the functions, services, and values of freshwater and estuarine wetlands throughout Jefferson County. 3) Establish review procedures for development proposals in and adjacent to wetlands. 4) Establish minimum standards for identifying and delineating wetlands 18.22.710 Classification/designation. Wetlands are those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas.Wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from nonwetland areas to mitigate conversion of wetlands. Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from nonwetland sites, including, but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July 1, 1990, that were unintentionally created as a result of the construction of a road, street, or highway. 1) Wetland Delineation. Wetlands shall be delineated in accordance with the requirements of RCW 36.70A.175. Unless otherwise provided for in this chapter, all areas within the county determined to be wetlands in accordance with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, 1987 Edition, and the Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Supplement (Version 2.0), 2010 or as revised, are hereby designated critical areas and are subject to the provisions of this article. 2) Wetland Rating. Wetlands shall be rated based on categories that reflect the functions and values of each wetland. Wetland categories shall be based on the criteria provided in the Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington, revised 2014, and as amended thereafter, as determined using the appropriate rating forms and associated figures contained in that publication. These categories are generally defined as follows: 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 65/108 APPENDIX A a) Category I. These wetlands are: (1) relatively undisturbed estuarine wetlands larger than one acre; (2) wetlands of high conservation value that are identified by scientists of the Washington Natural Heritage Program/Washington Department of Natural Resources; (3) bogs; (4) mature and old-growth forested wetlands larger than one acre; (5) wetlands in coastal lagoons; (6) wetlands that perform many functions well (scoring a total of 23 or more points). These wetlands: 1) represent unique or rare wetland types; (2) are more sensitive to disturbance than most wetlands; (3) are relatively undisturbed and contain ecological attributes that are impossible to replace within a human lifetime; or, (4) provide a high level of functions. b) Category II. These wetlands are: (1) estuarine wetlands smaller than one acre or disturbed estuarine wetlands larger than one acre or(2)wetlands with a moderately high level of functions scoring between 20 and 22 points total). c) Category III. These wetlands are (1) those with moderate level of functions (scoring between 16 and 19 points total) or (2) those that can often be adequately replaced with a well-planned mitigation project. Wetlands scoring between 16 and 19 point generally have been disturbed in some ways and are often less diverse or more isolated from other natural resources in the landscape than Category II wetlands. d) Category IV. These wetlands have the lowest levels of functions (scoring 15 or fewer total points) and are often heavily disturbed. These wetlands likely could be replaced or improved in some cases. Replacement cannot be guaranteed in any specific case. These wetlands may provide some important functions, so they should be protected to some degree. 3) Category IV wetlands that are non-federally regulated and not associated with a riparian area and less than one-tenth acre (4,356 square feet) shall be exempt from the requirements of this article when all of the following criteria are met: a) The wetland does not provide significant breeding habitat for native amphibian species. Breeding habitat is indicated by adequate and stable seasonal inundation, presence of thin- stemmed emergent vegetation, and clean water; b)The wetland does not have unique characteristics that would be difficult to replace through standard compensatory mitigation practices; c)The wetland is not located within a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area (FWHCA) or a FWHCA buffer as defined in Article VI of this chapter, and is not integral to the maintenance of habitat functions of an FWHCA; d) The wetland is not located within a floodplain; e) The wetland is not within the jurisdiction of the county shoreline master program; f) The wetland is not part of a mosaic of wetlands and uplands, as determined using the guidance provided in the wetland rating system; and, g) The wetland does not score five or more points for habitat functions (based on the 2014 version of the Washington Department of Ecology Wetland Rating System, or as amended by Washington Department of Ecology). 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 66/108 APPENDIX A In addition, mitigation in the form of enhancement or expansion of another part of the buffer should be considered in order to offset any expansion of a nonconforming use or structure. Wetlands less than one-tenth acre that meet the above criteria shall not be filled or otherwise altered. This exemption does not allow for unmitigated alteration of wetland area or functions. Alteration of any wetland, including wetlands less than one-tenth of an acre, shall require mitigation. 4) General. Application for a project on a parcel of real property containing a designated wetland shall adhere to the requirements in this section. a) Types of Wetland Evaluations. An applicant submitting an application for a development, use, or activity on lands determined to be wetland shall also submit, and have approved, a wetland evaluation prepared based on results of an on-site field investigation conducted by a qualified wetland professional using wetland delineation manuals specified in JCC 18.22.710. The wetland evaluation shall be completed based on the following: i) Wetland Reconnaissance. This type of wetland assessment does not require flagging of wetland boundaries or completing a wetland rating form. It shall be used if no regulated wetland is present within 300 feet of the project area, which includes those areas that may be temporarily affected by construction-related activities or would be within the limits of construction. The wetland reconnaissance requires the wetland specialist to assess all areas within 300 feet of any proposed project component. ii) Wetland Delineation. This type of wetland assessment shall be used if any portion of the proposed project is within 300 feet of a regulated wetland, including those areas that may be temporarily affected by construction-related activities or are within the proposed limits of clearing. The on-site wetland boundary shall be flagged in the field and flags shall be numbered sequentially, and a wetland rating form shall be completed, as required by JCC 18.22.710(1), for each wetland identified. A wetland delineation report shall be prepared by the wetland specialist based on report requirements presented in Article VIII special reports) of this chapter. b) If the wetland is located off of the property involved in the project application and is inaccessible, the best available information shall be used to determine the wetland boundary and category. 18.22.720 Regulated activities. 1) Activities Subject to Regulation. Any land use or development activity shall be subject to the provisions of this Article VII, including, but not limited to, the following activities that are directly undertaken or originate in a regulated wetland, unless exempted under JCC 18.22.070: a) The removal, excavation, grading, or dredging of material of any kind, including the construction of ponds and trails; b) The dumping or discharging of any material, or placement of any fill; c) The draining, flooding, or disturbing of the wetland water level or water table; 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 67/108 APPENDIX A d) The driving of pilings; e)The placing of anything that obstructs water movement, including but not limited to, surface water flow, surface water runoff, or groundwater infiltration; f) The construction, reconstruction, or expansion of any structure; g) The destruction or alteration of wetland vegetation through clearing, harvesting, shading, intentional burning, application of herbicides or pesticides, or planting of vegetation that would alter existing wetland conditions; or, h) The alteration or modification of water quality or water quantity. 2) Requirements for Waiver for Single-Family Residence. The requirement for a wetland evaluation may be waived by the administrator for construction of a single-family residence on an existing lot of record if department staff or a qualified wetland evaluator determines that: a) Sufficient information exists for staff to estimate the boundaries of a wetland without a delineation; and, b) The single-family residence and all accessory structures and uses are not proposed to be located within the distances identified in Table 18.22.730(1)(a) from the estimated wetland boundary. 18.22.730 Protection standards. The following activities may be permitted in wetlands or wetland buffers as specified when all reasonable measures have been taken to avoid adverse effects on wetland functions and values as documented through a wetland report prepared by a qualified wetland specialist. . Compensatory mitigation is required for all adverse impacts to wetlands that cannot be avoided. To the maximum extent practicable, impacts to buffers shall be minimized and any disturbed buffer areas shall be immediately restored except as specifically allowed. 1) Utility lines in Category II, Ill, and IV wetlands and their buffers or Category I wetland buffers when no feasible conveyance alternative is available shall be designed and constructed to minimize physical, hydrologic, and ecological impacts to the wetland, and meet all of the following: a) The utility line is located as far from the wetland edge or buffer as possible and in a manner that minimizes disturbance of soils and vegetation. b) Clearing, grading, and excavation activities are limited to the minimum necessary to install the utility line and the area is restored following utility installation. c.) Buried utility lines shall be constructed in a manner that prevents adverse impacts to surface and subsurface drainage. This may include regrading to the approximate original contour or the use of trench plugs or other devices as needed to maintain hydrology. d) Best management practices are used in maintaining said utility corridors such that maintenance activities do not expand the corridor further into the critical area. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 68/108 APPENDIX A 2) Public roads or bridges in Category II, Ill, and IV wetlands and their buffers or Category I wetland buffers when no feasible alternative alignment is available and the road or bridge is designed and constructed to minimize physical, hydrologic, and ecological impacts to the wetland, including placement on elevated structures as an alternative to fill, where feasible. 3) Access to private development sites may be permitted to cross Category II, Ill, or IV wetlands or their buffers; provided there are no feasible alternative alignments and measures are taken to maintain preconstruction hydrologic connectivity across the access road. Alternative access shall be pursued to the maximum extent feasible, including through the provisions of Chapter 8.24 RCW. Exceptions or deviations from technical standards for width or other dimensions, and specific construction standards to minimize impacts may be specified, including placement on elevated structures as an alternative to fill, if feasible. 4) Low-impact, passive recreational activities may be constructed, such as pervious trails, nonpermanent wildlife watching blinds, and scientific or educational activities, and sports fishing or hunting; provided, construction is limited to the outer 25 percent of the buffer. Trails within buffers shall be designed to minimize impacts to the wetland and shall not include any impervious surfaces and avoid removal of significant trees. 5) Stormwater management within the buffers of only Category III and IV wetlands with habitat scores of 3-4 points, are allowed provided the management techniques follow published guidelines for stormwater management in wetlands by the Washington Department of Ecology and are vegetation-lined swales designed for stormwater management or conveyance when topographic restraints determine there are no other upland alternative locations. Swales used for detention purposes may only be placed in the outer 25 percent of the buffer. Conveyance swales may be placed through the buffer, if necessary. 6)Wetland buffer widths. a) The standard buffer shall be based on a combination wetland category, habitat function score from the wetland rating form), and land use intensity. The intensity of the land use shall be determined in accordance with the definitions as listed below unless the technical administrator determines that a lesser level of impact is appropriate based on information provided by the applicant demonstrating that the proposed land use will have a lesser impact on the wetland than that contemplated under the buffer standard otherwise appropriate for the land use, The administrator shall have the authority to require buffers from the edges of all wetlands, in addition to the building setback in accordance with the following: b)Wetland buffers shall be established to protect the integrity, functions, and values of the wetland. Wetland buffers shall be measured horizontally from a perpendicular line established by the wetland boundary based on the base buffer width identified in Table 18.22.730(1)(a). Buffers shall not include areas that are functionally and effectively disconnected from the wetland by an existing, legally established road or another substantial developed surface. c) The buffer standards required by this article presume the existence of a dense, multi-storied native vegetation community in the buffer adequate to protect the wetland functions and values. When a buffer lacks adequate vegetation, the technical administrator may increase the standard 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 69/108 APPENDIX A buffer, require buffer planting or enhancement, or deny a proposal for buffer reduction or buffer averaging. e) Standard buffer widths are shown in Table 18.22.730(1). However, for Category I or II wetlands with "special characteristics" as determined and defined through the Washington Department of Ecology(2014)Wetland Rating System as it exists now or may be amended in the future (including estuarine, coastal lagoons, wetlands of high conservation value, bogs, forested, and interdunal wetlands), only buffers in the highest habitat score (8 to 9) group are applied. i)The prescribed buffer widths are based the wetland category(I, II, Ill, IV) as determined by the scoring results on the rating form for the wetland rating system; and, the expected level of impact of the proposed adjacent land use. High intensity land use" means land use that includes the following uses or activities: commercial, urban, industrial, institutional, retail sales, residential (more than one unit/acre), high-intensity new agriculture (dairies, nurseries, greenhouses, raising and harvesting crops requiring annual tilling, raising and maintaining animals), high-intensity recreation (golf courses, ball fields), hobby farms, and Class IV special forest practices, including the building of logging roads. A High Intensity Land Use may become a Moderate Intensity Land Use where Required Measures to Minimize Impacts in Table 18.22.730(1)(b) are made part of the proposal and where a buffer condition is well vegetated per 18.22.730(8) criteria. Low intensity land use" means land use that includes the following uses or activities: forestry (cutting of trees only), low intensity open space (such as passive recreation and natural resources preservation), utility corridor without a maintenance road and little or no vegetation management and unpaved trails. Low intensity uses incorporate features in Table 18.22.730(1)(b) by the nature of their use. Moderate intensity land use" means land use that includes the following uses or activities: residential (one unit/gross acre or less), moderate-intensity open space (parks), moderate-intensity new agriculture (such as orchards and hay fields), utility corridor or right-of-way shared by several utilities and including access/maintenance roads and paved trails. The administrator may determine, on the basis of detailed information from the applicant about the site conditions, scope, and intensity of the proposed development, that the proposed land use will have a lesser level of impact on the wetland than indicated by similar land uses on the list. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 70/108 APPENDIX A Table 18.22.730(1)(a). Standard Wetland Buffer Widths Land Use Intensity* Wetland Habitat Function High Impact Moderate Low Impact Buffer Category Score Buffer Width Impact Buffer Width (feet) feet) Width (feet) Category I 8—9 300 225 150 6— 7 150 110 75 3- 5 100 75 50 Category II 8 —9 300 225 150 6— 7 150 110 75 3- 5 100 75 50 Category III 8 —9 300 225 150 6—7 150 110 75 3- 5 80 60 50 Category IV All 50 40 25 Table 18.22.730(1)(b). Required measures to minimize impacts to wetlands All measures are required if applicable to a specific proposal) Disturbance Required Measures to Minimize Impacts Lights Direct lights away from wetland Noise Locate activity that generates noise away from wetland If warranted, enhance existing buffer with native vegetation plantings adjacent to noise source For activities that generate relatively continuous, potentially disruptive noise, such as certain heavy industry or mining, establish an additional 10' heavily vegetated buffer strip immediately adjacent to the outer wetland buffer Toxic runoff Route all new, untreated runoff away from wetland while ensuring wetland is not dewatered Establish covenants limiting use of pesticides within 150 ft of wetland Apply integrated pest management Stormwater runoff • Retrofit stormwater detention and treatment for roads and existing adjacent development Prevent channelized flow from lawns that directly enters the buffer Use Low Intensity Development techniques (for more information refer to the drainage ordinance and manual) 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 71/108 APPENDIX A Disturbance Required Measures to Minimize Impacts Change in water • Infiltrate or treat, detain, and disperse into buffer new runoff from regime impervious surfaces and new lawns Pets and human • Use privacy fencing or plant dense vegetation to delineate buffer disturbance edge and to discourage disturbance using vegetation appropriate for the ecoregion Place wetland and its buffer in a separate tract or protect with a conservation easement Dust Use best management practices to control dust 6) Buffer Marking. Upon approval of the wetland evaluation, the location of the outer extent of the wetland buffer shall be identified as follows: a)The outer extent of the wetland buffer shall be flagged onsite.(b) In the case of short plat, long plat, and binding site plan, the applicant shall include on the face of any such plan the boundary of the wetland and its buffer. c) For all other approvals, the administrator shall have the authority to require a notice to title be recorded on the property by the property owner prior to any permits may be issued. d) The administrator shall require signs be posted at the buffer edge if the proposed activity is commercial or industrial, or if the activity is proposed on public lands. 7) Buffers—Standard Requirements. a) The administrator shall have the authority to require buffers from the boundaries of all wetlands as established by this article, and in accordance with the following criteria. i) Wetland buffer widths shall be measured along a horizontal line perpendicular to the wetland boundary as marked in the field during delineation if required, or based upon site investigation, aerial photographs, or LiDAR images. ii) Functionally isolated buffer areas will be subject to wetland evaluation to determine protective functions such as whether or not the isolated buffer area is used by wildlife to gain access to the wetland. In instances where substantial wildlife use is documented, the area shall be retained as buffer despite being otherwise isolated or disconnected from the wetland. iii) When a buffer is on a slope steeper than 30 percent, or lacks adequately dense and diverse vegetation, the administrator may deny a proposal for buffer reduction or buffer averaging. 8) Reducing Buffer Widths. Buffer widths may be reduced as depicted in Table 18.22.730(1)(c) when implementing listed impact-reducing measures on the adjacent land use per Table 18.22.730(1)(b) and requiring a protected vegetated corridor between the wetland and a Priority Habitat or relatively undisturbed area, if present. Other buffer reductions may be allowed upon submission of a wetland evaluation by a wetland specialist that demonstrates a buffer reduction does not adversely affect the existing functions and values of the wetland. The administrator shall 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 72/108 APPENDIX A have the authority to reduce the prescribed buffer widths listed in the Table 18.22.735(1)(a); provided, all of the following shall apply: a) The wetland buffer of a Category I or II wetland is not reduced to less than 75 percent of the standard buffer; b) The buffer of a Category III or IV wetland is not reduced to less than 75 percent of the required buffer, or 25 feet, whichever is greater; c) The applicant implements reasonable measures to reduce the adverse impacts of structures and appurtenances on the subject parcel as determined by the administrator; and, d) Buffer area reduction shall be minimized to accommodate only those structures and appurtenances as approved by the administrator. Table 18.22.730(1)(c) Reduced Wetland Buffer Widths with integration of Table 18.22.730(1)(b) Measures Reduced Wetland Buffer Widths with Implementation of Table 18.22.730(1)(b) Measures Wetland Habitat High Impact Category Function Buffer Width 8-9 225 6-7 110 3-5 75 I I 8-9 225 6-7 110 3-5 75 III 8-9 225 6-7 110 3-5 60 IV all 40 9) Averaging Buffer Widths. Upon submission of a wetland evaluation by a wetland specialist that demonstrates a buffer reduction does not adversely affect the existing functions and values of the wetland, the administrator shall have the authority to average wetland buffer widths on a case-by-case basis; provided, all of the following shall apply: a)The buffer averaging does not have any adverse impact on the functions and values of the wetland and provides greater protection of the wetland; b) The total area contained within the buffer after averaging is no less than that which would be contained within the prescribed buffer, and the buffer boundary remains more or less parallel to the wetland boundary; 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 73/108 APPENDIX A c) The most sensitive, or highest value, areas of the wetland have the widest buffer dimensions, and the buffer boundary considers variations in slope, soils, or vegetation to optimize the overall effectiveness of the buffer; d) The minimum buffer width is no less than 75 percent of the standard prescribed buffer width; e) The buffer width was not already the subject of a buffer reduction; and, f) If area of buffer reduction is composed of native trees that are 8 inches in diameter at breast height, the buffer reduction shall not be approved unless the area of buffer increase consists of native trees of a similar size, age, density, and species composition as that in the area to be reduced. 10) Buffer reductions in excess of those allowed under buffer reductions or buffer averaging will be subject to a variance or reasonable economic use exception, as applicable under JCC 18.22.250 and 18.22.260 or may pursue a financially bonded critical areas stewardship plan CASP), as applicable under JCC 18.22.965; provided, the proposal can meet all CASP financial and other provisions. 11) Increasing Buffer Widths. Buffer widths may be increased on a case-by-case basis, as determined by the administrator, to protect the functions and values of a wetland. Supporting documents that may be used to support this determination, include but are not limited to: a) The wetland is used by, or has habitat features that could be used by, state or federally listed threatened or endangered species; b) The wetland serves as nesting or foraging habitat for raptors or great blue herons; c) The area adjacent to the wetland is susceptible to erosion or landslide; or, d)The area adjacent to the wetland has minimal deep rooting, native vegetation or the slopes are greater than 30 percent. 18.22.740 Mitigation. The overall goal of mitigation shall be no net loss of wetland function, value, and area. 1) Mitigation Sequence. Mitigation includes avoiding, minimizing, or compensating for adverse impacts to regulated wetlands. When a proposed use or development activity poses potentially significant adverse impacts to a regulated wetland, the preferred sequence of mitigation as defined below shall be followed unless the applicant demonstrates that an overriding public benefit would warrant an exception to this preferred sequence. a)Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action; b) Minimizing adverse impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation; 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 74/108 APPENDIX A c) Rectifying the adverse impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment to the historical condition or the condition existing at the time of the initiation of a project; d) Reducing or eliminating the adverse impact over time by preservation and maintenance operation during the life of the action; e) Compensating for the adverse impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments; f) Monitoring the required compensation and taking appropriate corrective measures when necessary. 2) Compensatory Wetland Mitigation — General Requirements. As a condition of any permit or other approval allowing alteration which results in the unavoidable loss or degradation of regulated wetlands, or as an enforcement action pursuant to Chapter 18.50 JCC, compensatory mitigation shall be required to offset impacts resulting from the actions of the applicant or any code violator. a) Except persons exempt under this article, any person who alters or proposes to alter regulated wetlands shall provide wetland mitigation that is equivalent to or larger than those altered in order to compensate for wetland losses. Table 18.22.740(1) specifies the mitigation ratios by category and type of mitigation that must be used for compensatory wetland mitigation: Table 18.22.740(1) Required Replacement Ratios for Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Category Re- Rehabilitation Re- Re- Enhancement and Type of establishment Only' establishment establishment Only' Wetland or Creation or Creation or Creation Impacts R/C) and R/C) and Rehabilitation Enhancement RH), E)' All Category 1.5:1 3:1 1:1 R/C and 1:1 R/C and 6:1 IV 1:1 RH 2:1 E All Category 2:1 4:1 1:1 R/C and 1:1 R/C and 8:1 III 2:1 RH 4:1 E Category II Case-by-case 4:1 Case-by-case Case-by-case Case-by-case Estuarine Rehabilitation of an estuarine wetland All Other 3:1 6:1 1:1 R/C and 1:1 R/C and 12:1 Category II 4:1 RH 8:1 E Category I 6:1 12:1 1:1 R/C and 1:1 R/C and 24:1 Forested 10:1 RH 20:1 E 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 75/108 APPENDIX A Category Re- Rehabilitation Re- Re- Enhancement and Type of establishment Only' establishment establishment Only' Wetland or Creation or Creation or Creation Impacts R/C) and R/C) and Rehabilitation Enhancement RH)1 E)' Category I 4:1 8:1 1:1 R/C and 1:1 R/C and 16:1 Based on 6:1 RH 12:1 E Score for Functions Category I Not considered 6:1 R/C not R/C not Case-by-case Wetlands possible2 Rehabilitation considered considered with High of a wetland possible3 possible3 Conservation with high Value conservation value Category I Not considered 6:1 R/C not R/C not Case-by-case Coastal possible2 Rehabilitation considered considered Lagoon of a coastal possible3 possible3 lagoon Category I Not considered 6:1 R/C not R/C not Case-by-case Bog possible2 Rehabilitation considered considered of a bog possible3 possible3 Category I Case-by-case 6:1 Case-by-case Case-by-case Case-by-case Estuarine Rehabilitation of an estuarine wetland 1 These ratios assume that the rehabilitation or enhancement actions implemented represent the average degree of improvement possible for the site. Proposals to implement more effective rehabilitation or enhancement actions may result in a lower ratio, while less effective actions may result in higher ratio. The distinction between rehabilitation and enhancement is not clear-cut. Instead, rehabilitation and enhancement actions span a continuum. Proposals that fall within the gray area between rehabilitation and enhancement will result in a ratio that lies between the ratios for rehabilitation and the ratios for enhancement. 2 Wetlands with high conservation value, coastal lagoons, and bogs are considered irreplaceable wetlands because they perform some functions that cannot be replaced through compensatory mitigation. Impacts to such wetlands would therefore result in a net loss of some functions no matter what kind of compensation is proposed. Note: Each type of mitigation is defined in Chapter 18.10.130 under mitigation types. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 76/108 APPENDIX A Category Re- Rehabilitation Re- Re- Enhancement and Type of establishment Only' establishment establishment Only1 Wetland or Creation or Creation or Creation Impacts R/C) and R/C) and Rehabilitation Enhancement RH)1 E)1 Note: Wetland preservation may be approved by the administrator under limited circumstances on a case-by-case basis if preservation requirements are met, as specified in Wetland Mitigation in Washington State, Part 1:Agency Policies and Guidance, or as amended. b) Compensatory mitigation may also be determined using methods described in Calculating Credits and Debits for Compensatory Mitigation in Wetlands of Western Washington: Final Report (Washington Department of Ecology Publication #10-06-011, or as amended); provided, the mitigation is consistent with Table 18.22.740(1). c) Compensatory mitigation must follow an approved compensatory mitigation plan pursuant to this article, with the replacement ratios as specified above. d) Compensatory mitigation must be conducted on property that will be protected and managed to avoid further development or degradation. The applicant or code violator must provide for long-term preservation of the compensation area. The administrator has the authority to require the applicant record a notice to title to ensure protection. e) Compensatory wetland mitigation shall be designed to mimic natural wetland hydrologic conditions, and shall not be used as a stormwater system to comply with Chapter 18.30 JCC. f)The applicant may be required to post a mitigation performance bond to ensure monitoring the site occurs and contingency plans are implemented if the project fails to meet projected goals. Corrective actions must be coordinated and approved by department of community development. 3) Compensatory Wetland Mitigation —Type, Location, and Timing. a) Mitigation is to be provided in the preferred order listed below. A lower order preference shall not be approved unless a wetlands evaluation prepared by a wetlands specialist documents to the satisfaction of the administrator that a higher preferred option is not ecologically viable. i) Restoration (re-establishment or rehabilitation) is the preferred mitigation option; ii) Creation (also referred to as establishment) may be approved if restoration is not an ecologically viable option; iii) Enhancement may be approved if restoration or creation are not ecologically viable options or may be required in the same buffer area when a use or structure is permitted and encroaches into the same buffer; 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 77/108 APPENDIX A iv) Preservation (also referred to as protection or maintenance) is the least preferred mitigation option and shall be permitted only under limited circumstances when, based on a report prepared by a wetlands specialist, the administrator determines that no other option is ecologically viable. b) On-site compensation within the same sub-drainage basin is preferred. The administrator may approve off-site compensation only if: i) A wetlands specialist documents that on-site mitigation is not feasible and that off-site mitigation is ecologically preferable; ii) No reasonable opportunities exist on-site and within the same sub-drainage basin; iii) On-site mitigation would result in the loss of high-quality upland habitats; iv) Off-site mitigation has a greater likelihood of compensating for project-related impact; v) On-site compensation is not feasible due to hydrology, soils, waves, or other factors; vi) On-site compensation is not practical due to probable adverse impacts from surrounding land uses; and, vii) Potential functions and values at the site of the proposed restoration are significantly greater than the lost wetland functional values. c) Compensation outside of the sub-drainage basin may be approved by the administrator if an in-lieu fee program is used. d) Construction of compensation projects must be timed to reduce impacts to existing wildlife and flora. Construction must be timed to assure that grading and soil movement occurs during the dry season. Planting of vegetation must be specifically timed to the needs of the target species. e) Compensation must be completed prior to wetland destruction, where feasible. 6) In-lieu Fee (ILF) Program. An applicant may opt to use an ILF program to compensate for impacts to aquatic resources (critical areas) or buffers based on criteria listed below. Use of an ILF program transfers the responsibility of providing compensatory mitigation from the applicant to an ILF program sponsor. The sponsoring organization is required to provide mitigation that complies with all mitigation requirements of this chapter. a) The ILF program may be used by an applicant as a way to mitigate for project impacts if the impacts to the critical area or buffer occur within an ILF program service area. If an impact occurs outside of an ILF Program Service Area, an applicant may request that Jefferson County investigate the possibility of using the ILF program as mitigation. The ILF program sponsor is under no obligation to accept mitigation responsibilities for impacts outside an ILF program service area. b) The applicant shall determine if there is a preference for using the ILF program over permittee-responsible mitigation to compensate for unavoidable impacts. The county may 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 78/108 APPENDIX A encourage an applicant to use the ILF program, but shall not require an applicant to use ILF for mitigation. c) The administrator may approve an application using an ILF program for mitigation if the ILF program sponsor accepts the mitigation responsibility. The sponsoring organization has the right to deny the request if the sponsoring organization cannot fulfill all ILF program mitigation requirements. If the sponsoring organization does not accept the mitigation responsibility, the applicant shall be responsible for providing mitigation that complies with this chapter. The administrator shall not approve a permit involving ILF mitigation until (1)the applicant has purchased the appropriate number of credits from the sponsoring organization and (2) the sponsoring organization has completed a statement of sale. Once the ILF program sponsor completes the financial transaction with the applicant, the sponsor becomes responsible for completing the mitigation effort to comply with Jefferson County Code critical areas requirements and the applicable approved in-lieu fee program instrument. Article VIII. Agriculture 18.22.800 Purpose and Intent. 1) Jefferson County desires to encourage the conservation of productive agricultural lands and to implement alternative means of protecting critical areas using conservation practices in this Article. As allowed under WAC 365-196-830 (Protection of Critical Areas), both regulatory and voluntary measures may be developed and used to prevent degradation of critical areas. 2) The well-being of agricultural activities in Jefferson County depends in part on good quality soil, water, air, and other natural resources. Agricultural operations that incorporate protection of the environment, including critical areas and their buffers as defined by Title 18 JCC, are essential to achieving this goal. 3)Jefferson County offers agricultural producers two paths to achieve no net loss of critical areas functions and values while supporting the viability of agriculture. These two paths are: a) A "prescriptive" approach is one in which standard buffer widths from streams, wetlands, and ponds are established, which may offer a simpler yet stricter set of standards; or, b) A "performance" based approach where the producer works independently or with farm assistance agencies to identify the resource concerns that are unique to the farm operation and to implement practices best suited to address those concerns. 4) Jefferson County shall ensure monitoring and adaptive management processes are in place to evaluate whether the application of performance-based approaches address resource concerns identified in this article to the extent related to agricultural activities. 18.22.810 Resource Concerns. Agricultural activities have the potential to create adverse impacts to critical areas. It is the county's policy to minimize such impacts. 1) Nutrient Pollution of Water. Agricultural activities without proper conservation practices may contribute wastes or sediments into a natural or modified natural stream or wetlands. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 79/108 APPENDIX A 2) Nutrient and Farm Chemical Management. Without proper conservation practices, manure could be carried into a stream, wetlands, or other waters of the state by any means. Farm chemicals must be applied consistent with chemical container labels and all applicable federal and state laws and regulations to avoid harm to streams, wetlands, and other fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas. 3) Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Management. Construction of roads used for agricultural purposes, agricultural equipment operation, and ditch construction and maintenance should be undertaken in such a manner as to avoid sediment contribution to streams. 4) Operation and Maintenance of Agricultural Drainage Infrastructure. Maintenance and operation of ditches should be designed to prevent maintenance problems, avoid blocking water flow, ensure control of erosion, avoid sedimentation, protect water quality, and ensure stream bank vegetation is protected or replanted. 5) Riparian Management. Dense riparian vegetation along the water's edge will slow and protect against flood flows; provide infiltration and filtering of pollutants; secure food and cover for fish, birds, and wildlife; and, keep water cooler in summer. Existing riparian vegetation should be managed to continue to provide soil and streambank stability, shade, filtration, and habitat for fish and wildlife, and control noxious weeds. 18.22.820 Applicability and Classification. 1) Applicability: Proponents of the following activities within fish and wildlife conservation areas or wetlands or their buffers shall comply with either the prescriptive standards of Chapter 18.22 JCC or the performance- based approach in this Article VIII: a) New or expanded areas of agricultural activities. b) Producers conducting one or more of the following activities within the footprint of the agricultural activity as of the effective date of this code (March 10, 2020): i) adding or expanding temporary or permanent structures; ii) adding or expanding compacted areas such as for parking, roads, or access; iii) adding or expanding impervious areas; iv) adding or replacing wells or septic systems; v) constructing or altering ditches or drainage systems; vi) constructing or altering farm and stock ponds; vii) expanding or altering manure or compost management structures or practices; viii) altering the application of fertilizers or agricultural chemical management activities in proximity to wetlands or water bodies; ix) adding or altering irrigation practices; or, x) other similar activities as determined by the administrator. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 80/108 APPENDIX A 2) This Article does not apply to: a) Exempt Activities per JCC 18.22.210. Agricultural activities occurring within the footprint of use as of the effective date of this code (March 10, 2020) are exempt from compliance with Chapter 18.22 JCC unless listed in JCC 18.22.720. b) Agricultural activities that do not lie within fish and wildlife conservation areas or wetlands. 3) Agricultural Checklist and Classification: The department shall develop, adopt and maintain an agricultural checklist in consultation with farm assistance agencies for completion by producers. The agricultural checklist shall identify agricultural activities and the conservation practice(s) necessary to achieve the performance standards in JCC 18.22.830 and avoid potential negative impacts described under resource concerns in JCC 18.22.810. Based on the achievement of performance standards as documented in the agricultural checklist, proposals shall be typed as follows: a) Type 1 Conservation Practices Compliant. Type 1 applies to producers that have a farm plan developed by State or Federal farm assistance agencies, or has completed the agricultural checklist, demonstrating that the proposal addresses performance standards in JCC 18.22.830 due to the nature of the proposals and conservation practices in place that avoid potential negative impacts described under resource concerns in JCC 18.22.810. b) Type 2 Conservation Practices Scheduled. Type 2 applies to proposals do not meet one or more performance standards in JCC 18.22.830 and identifies conservation practices that will adequately address resource concerns created by the agricultural activities. The conservation practices shall be implemented based on a schedule developed in consultation with farm assistance agencies or a report by a natural resource conservation professional. Such scheduled conservation practices shall avoid resource concerns identified in JCC 18.22.810 and meet performance standards in JCC 18.22.830. c) Type 3 Critical Area Undocumented. Type 3 proposals do not meet Type 1 or 2 criteria and cannot document that appropriate conservation practices have been implemented or scheduled that will adequately address resource concerns created by the agricultural practices. The producer shall complete an agricultural checklist and provide a report prepared by a State or Federal farm assistance agency or a natural resource conservation professional to demonstrate how the proposal meets the performance standards in JCC 18.22.830 and avoids potential negative impacts described under resource concerns in JCC 18.22.810. If performance standards cannot be met with adequate conservation practices scheduled, the proponent shall be subject to the prescriptive standards of this chapter and may apply for variances or reasonable economic use exceptions as applicable under 18.22.250 and 18.22.260, where appropriate or may pursue a financially bonded critical area stewardship plan (CASP) as applicable under JCC 18.22.965 provided, the proposal can meet all CASP financial and other provisions. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 81/108 APPENDIX A 18.22.830 Protection Standards. 1) Performance Standards. Producers shall submit an agricultural checklist and supporting documentation to the satisfaction of the administrator to demonstrate the following performance standards are met due to the nature of the proposal as well as installed or scheduled conservation practices: a) Structures and impervious surfaces are sited to prevent manure, pathogens, sediment, and other contaminants from entering fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas and wetlands. b) Roof runoff is managed so that it does not result in ponding or channeling in confinement areas, or contribute to the discharge of manure, pathogens, sediment, pesticides, and other contaminants to fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas and wetlands. c) Areas of farm production are managed to prevent stormwater from carrying manure, pathogens, sediment, pesticides, and other contaminants from entering all fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas and wetlands. d) Catch basins, drains, tiles, pipes and other conveyances of surface and ground water that outlet to streams and ditches installed and maintained in a manner that prevents the entry of manure, pathogens, sediment, pesticides, and other contaminants. e) Livestock are excluded from fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas and wetlands by means of fencing, gates or other controls that are consistent with the practices recommended by farm assistance agencies. f) Buffers are established that either: (i) are consistent with either the prescriptive standards in Chapter 18.22 JCC applicable to fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas or wetlands or 2) consistent with farm assistance agency-designed conservation practices that provide for buffers around fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas or wetlands within areas where livestock are kept. g) Manure is handled and stored in a way that prevents nutrients, pathogens, sediment, and other contaminants from entering fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas and wetlands. h) Manure is applied in a manner and its application timed to prevent pollution of fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas and wetlands. i) Compost production is handled and stored in a way that prevents stormwater from carrying nutrients, pathogens, sediment and other contaminants into fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas and wetlands. j) Application of fertilizers or agricultural chemicals for weed and pest control are conducted in a manner that prevents them from entering any fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas and wetlands on the farm either by aerial drift or by stormwater run-off. k) The proposal avoids adverse alteration of wetland hydrology. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 82/108 APPENDIX A I) The proposal protects riparian vegetation or tree cover after drainage maintenance or construction. m) The proposal maintains surface and groundwater flow, discharge, and recharge, through such means including but not limited to maintaining soil permeability, avoiding net increases in impervious areas, avoiding compaction, or avoiding changing discharge to streams. n) Existing native woody vegetation is retained along streams, lakes, ponds, and wetlands consistent with the practices recommended by farm assistance agencies. o)The site has not been cleared under a forest practices permit or altered tree cover by more than 10,000 square feet. p) If in a flood hazard area, all fill or excavation or additional permanent impervious areas as proposed are in conformity with County flood hazard regulations and the practices recommended by farm assistance agencies. q) The proposed agricultural activity is consistent with locational allowances in Subsection 2). 2) Locational Standards. Table 18.22.830(1) identifies agricultural activities that are allowed in or near wetlands and streams and their prescriptive buffers. a) Cultivation and production and agricultural structures, buildings, impervious areas shall meet the locational allowances and associated performance standards. Table 18.22.830(1). Agricultural Activities Allowances in Wetland and Wetland/Stream Buffers Activity Allowed in Wetlands Allowed in Prescriptive Wetland and Stream Buffers Cultivation and Yes, existing agricultural activities Yes, existing agricultural activities production lawfully established as of the lawfully established as of the effective date of this chapter effective date of this chapter March 10, 2020) March 10, 2020) Yes, new or expanded agricultural Yes, new or expanded agricultural activities 1'2 activities 1'2 Agricultural Limited to activities addressed by Yes, existing agricultural activities structures, farm assistance agency practices lawfully established as of the buildings, on farmed wetlands, including but effective date of this chapter impervious areas not limited to high tunnel systems, (March 10, 2020) where consistent with federal and state law'2 3 Yes, new or expanded agricultural activities1,2 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 83/108 APPENDIX A Notes: Subject to performance standards in JCC 18.22.830(1) and determined to be a Type I or Type 2 proposal per JCC 18.22.820. 2 Conditions or performance standards applied by the administrator may include but are not limited to wetland/riparian or buffer enhancement in limited circumstances and as determined in consultation with a farm assistance agency or qualified professional, provided proposed actions for compensation are conducted in advance of the impact and are shown to be successful and provided enhancement is part of ongoing monitoring. 3 Producers shall demonstrate they have received a NRCS Certified Wetlands Determination or equivalent determination by another farm assistance agency, state oversight agency official, qualified professional, or Jefferson County. 3) Structures. Structures shall be determined to achieve no-net-loss of critical area functions and values when following NRCS Field Office Technical Guides (FOTGs). Documentation supports the administrator making a written decision finding that the landowner's compliance with other state or federal regulations or permits provides sufficient protection on the site to satisfy related critical areas requirements of this chapter. a) The administrator may condition the proposed agricultural activities to avoid resource concerns in JCC 18.22.810 through the application of conservation practices recommended by farm assistance agencies or a qualified professional. b) If the agricultural activity is a Type 3 Critical Area Undocumented or does not demonstrably meet the performance standards in JCC 18.22.730(1), or does not meet locational requirements of Table 18.22.830(1), the administrator shall deny proposal. The proponent may seek use of the prescriptive path offered in Chapter 18.22 JCC. 3) Conservation Practices. Agricultural landowners and operators are encouraged to design conservation practices through use of the following resources: a) Section 4 of the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) "Field Office Technical Guide" (FOTG) contains a nonexclusive list of conservation practices to guide implementation of the expectations of this article. b) The Jefferson County conservation district is available to assist with completion of an agricultural checklist and in the development of conservation plans approved through the NRCS. A producer may also work with other farm assistance agencies. 4) Scheduled Conservation Practices. For a Type 2 Conservation Practices Scheduled proposal, the proponent shall identify the standards by which the practice will be designed and the scheduled date of implementation. The proponent shall provide documentation the scheduled conservation practice has been established in accordance with the design specifications following implementation. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 84/108 APPENDIX A 18.22.840 Monitoring and Adaptive Management Monitoring provides information used by Jefferson County to assist in determining the effectiveness of the County's critical area regulations and conservation practices applicable to agricultural activities. Jefferson County shall develop a cooperative monitoring program with producers, conservation district and farm assistance agency staff based on the conservation practices and performance standards of approved critical areas permits in agricultural areas. The monitoring program shall identify existing functions and values per subsection (1), the thresholds of no harm or degradation in subsection (2), and the benchmarks and outcomes in subsection 3). The monitoring and adaptive management report shall be prepared periodically in accordance with subsection (4). 1) "Existing functions and values" relate to the following categories as compared to conditions as of effective date of this chapter (March 10, 2020): a)Water quality, as documented in a given watershed by the Jefferson County conservation district or other management agency. b) The existence or absence of large woody debris within a stream, as documented in the analyses completed by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for the Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIAs) 16, 17, 20, and 21, or other relevant studies. c) The existing riparian buffer characteristics and width, including, but not limited to, the existing amount of shade provided by the existing riparian buffer, as documented in analyses completed for the Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIAs) 16, 17, 20, and 21, or other relevant studies. d) The existing channel morphology as documented with Washington Department of Natural Resources Aerial Photography. e) Location and functions of wetlands if present and determined by a wetland rating or as depicted by National Wetlands Inventory, Jefferson County GIS critical areas mapper or other mapped documentation and described by a wetland rating (when available). 2) "No harm or degradation" means the following: a) Maintaining or improving documented water quality levels, if available. b) Meeting, or working towards meeting, the requirements of any total maximum daily load TMDL) requirements established by the Washington Department of Ecology pursuant to Chapter 90.48 RCW. c) Meeting all applicable requirements of Chapter 77.55 RCW and Chapter 220-660 WAC Hydraulics Code). d) No evidence of degradation to the existing fish and wildlife habitat characteristics of the stream or wetland that can be reasonably attributed to adjacent agricultural activities. e) The references above to Chapter 77.55, Chapter 90.48 RCW, Chapter 173-201A, and Chapter 220-660 WAC shall not be interpreted to replace Washington Department of Ecology 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 85/108 APPENDIX A and Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife authority to implement and enforce these state programs. 3) Monitoring Program Benchmarks and Outcomes: a) Water quality monitoring results shall be based on sampling data collected and analyzed by Jefferson County department of public health or a designated partnering agency. To comply with the no harm requirement for water quality, all parameters evaluated must remain comparable(or improve) relative to established state standards. If any water quality parameter shows a decline, the departments of community development and public health may require on-site sampling of upstream and downstream water quality conditions to determine if permitted activities that have been implemented have since affected water quality. b) Habitat ecology should remain comparable to the watershed conditions as documented by agencies with expertise with no net loss of critical area functions and values compared to a baseline as of the effective date of this ordinance (March 10, 2020). Additionally, indicators of habitat conditions, such as (1) the percent cover of woody vegetation shall not result in a net decrease; (2) the amount of habitat features such as snags, downed woody debris, and open water habitats shall not result in a net decrease. c) In-stream fish habitat, wetland and riparian vegetation conditions should remain stable or improve (based on assessments, reports, and online information published the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife or another state or federal agency with comparable expertise). Critical area restoration and habitat improvement projects when required as part of approved conservation practices or performance standards shall meet specific benchmarks to ensure success.The applicant shall propose specific benchmarks for approval by the Director. The benchmarks shall reference indicators of habitat conditions per subsection (b) or other relevant habitat ecology indicators based on site specific conditions, advice from farm assistance agencies, advice from agencies with expertise, or applicable areawide studies by qualified professionals or agencies with expertise that are relevant to the site. At a site- specific level, any activity that negatively affects salmonids shall be considered a negative benchmark. This could include, but is not limited to, installation of in-stream barriers to fish passage, removing woody debris from a stream, altering spawning gravel, altering pool/riffle instream conditions, or introduction of chemicals into the water column. d)Wetland area and function should remain stable or improve, as documented by monitoring or periodic site inspection of plan implementation or aerial photo analysis of mapped wetlands within areas of new or expanded agricultural intersects. 4) Reporting. The administrator shall periodically review the monitoring and adaptive management report of applicant conservation practices programs' implementation and compliance beginning one year after the effective date of this article and every two years thereafter, through the life of the monitoring and adaptive management report, or more frequently at the administrator's discretion. The review may include periodic site inspections, a certification of compliance by the producer, or other appropriate actions. A subset of properties may be monitored on a rotating basis. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 86/108 APPENDIX A a) Self-certification is allowed for approved Type 1 or Type 2 classifications. A sufficient self- certification monitoring report shall include photos and implemented conservation practices or documentation from farm assistance agencies or a qualified professional. Self-certifications shall be submitted within 45 days of request, county staff may make a site visit. Site visits will be coordinated with the landowner/producer. Prior to carrying out a site inspection, the administrator shall provide reasonable notice to the owner or manager of the property as to the purpose or need for the entry, receive confirmation, and afford at least two weeks in selecting a date and time for the visit. At the landowner's/producer's discretion, the Jefferson conservation district staff or other farm assistance agency staff may accompany staff. b) The County will in cooperation with producers or farm assistance agency staff, publish the results of its periodic reviews and make them available to the public and state agencies. These results will include all baseline monitoring data, summary statistics, an assessment of the accuracy and completeness of the data, and a description of data collection issues if any, identified during the reporting period as well as the following additional information: i) A description of all compliance assessments and source identification actions taken during the reporting period; ii) A description of educational outreach actions as well as enforcement actions taken during the reporting period; iii) A description of any actions taken to modify conservation practices on a site or area specific basis; and, iv) A discussion of monitoring priorities for the next reporting period. v) Potential adaptive management measures applicable on an areawide or countywide basis when monitoring indicates: that standards or thresholds are being exceeded; the exceedance is adversely affecting designated critical areas; and, a change in regulations that are applicable areawide or countywide is needed to address the exceedance. Modifications may also be made if monitoring indicates that less stringent standards are appropriate based on best available science. 18.22.850 Compliance. 1) Critical area protection is required for existing and ongoing agriculture as well as new agriculture. All agricultural activities shall be conducted so as not to cause harm or degrade the existing functions of critical areas and associated buffers. 2)Agricultural activities are expected to meet the objectives and standards of this Article through voluntary compliance. Agricultural operations shall cease to be in compliance with this article, and a new or revised agricultural checklist and supporting documentation will be required consistent with JCC 18.22.820, when the administrator determines that any of the following has occurred: a)When a producer fails to implement and maintain their conservation practices determined to exist or be scheduled in a Type 1 or Type 2 review per JCC 18.22.820 properly and fully. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 87/108 APPENDIX A b) When implementation of the conservation practices fails to protect critical areas. If so, a new or revised agricultural checklist and schedule of conservation practices shall be required per JCC 18.22.820 to protect the values and functions of critical areas at the benchmark condition described in JCC 18.22.840 or a baseline established by the producer in consultation with a farm assistance agency or qualified professional. c)When substantial changes in the agricultural activities of the farm or livestock operation have occurred that render the current agricultural checklist and associated conservation practices ineffective. Substantial changes that render an agricultural checklist and associated conservation practices ineffective are those that: i) Degrade baseline critical area conditions for riparian and wetland areas that existed when the plan was approved; ii) Result either in a direct discharge or substantial potential discharge of pollution to surface or ground water; or, iii) The type of agricultural practices changes from Type 1 to Type 2, Type 2 to Type 3. d)When a new or revised agricultural checklist and supporting documentation is required, and the producer has been so advised in writing and a reasonable amount of time has passed without significant progress being made to develop said plan. Refusal or inability to provide a new agricultural checklist within a reasonable period of time shall be sufficient grounds to revoke the approved agricultural activity and require compliance with the standard provisions of this chapter. 3) When a producer denies the administrator reasonable access to the property for technical assistance, monitoring, or compliance purposes, then the administrator shall document such refusal of access and notify the producer of his/her findings. The producer shall be given an opportunity to respond in writing to the findings of the administrator, propose a prompt alternative access schedule, and to state any other issues that need to be addressed. Refusal or inability to comply with an approved agricultural checklist and schedule of conservation practices within a reasonable period of time shall be sufficient grounds to revoke said plan and require compliance with the standard provisions of this chapter. 4) If agricultural activities result in degradation of a critical area, the producer shall be required to either cease the agricultural activity that results in critical area degradation or prepare an agricultural checklist and supporting documentation that demonstrates how farming activities will be brought into compliance with critical area protection requirements. The agricultural checklist shall be submitted to department of community development for review and approval. If the administrator determines the proposed activities and conservation practices do not sufficiently address critical areas degradation, a farm assistance agency or qualified professional shall prepare a schedule of conservation practices. The proponent shall allow the County or farm agency with expertise reasonable access to the parcel to determine that the scheduled conservation practices are installed, and critical areas functions are not being degraded. If compliance cannot be achieved, other enforcement action based on Chapter 18.50 shall be required. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 88/108 APPENDIX A 5) A producer is responsible only for those conditions caused by agricultural activities conducted by the producer and is not responsible for conditions that do not meet the standards of this article resulting from actions of others or from natural conditions not related to the on-site agricultural operations. Conditions resulting from unusual weather events (such as storm in excess of a 25- year, 24-hour storm) or other exceptional circumstances that are not the product of obvious neglect are not the responsibility of the owner or operator. 18.22.860 Limited Public Disclosure. 1) Producers that have a farm plan developed by State or Federal farm assistance agencies will not be subject to public disclosure unless required by law or a court of competent jurisdiction; 2) Provided, that the county will collect summary information related to the general location of a farming enterprise, the nature of the farming activity, and the specific conservation management practices to be implemented such as through an agricultural checklist per JCC 18.22.720. The summary information shall be provided by the producer or his/her designee and shall be used to document the basis for the county's approval of the proposal. 3) The county will provide to the public via its website information regarding which farms have approved Type 1 or Type 2 conservation practices per JCC 18.22.720 and the date of their approval. 4) Upon request, the county may provide a sample agricultural checklist, exclusive of site- or property specific information, to give general guidance on the development of a conservation farm plan. Article IX. Special Reports 18.22.900 Purpose. 1) Purpose. Special reports may be required to provide environmental information and to present proposed strategies for maintaining, protecting, or mitigating impacts to critical areas: a) Demonstrate that the submitted proposal is consistent with the purposes and specific standards of this chapter; b) Describe all relevant aspects of the development proposal and critical areas adversely affected by the proposal and assess impacts on the critical area from activities and uses proposed; and, c) Where impacts are unavoidable, demonstrate through an alternatives analysis that no other feasible alternative exists. d) Consider the cumulative impacts of the proposed action that includes past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions to facilitate the goal of no net loss of critical areas. Such impacts shall include those to wildlife, habitat, and migration corridors; water quality and quantity; and, other geologic or watershed processes that relate to critical area condition, process, or service. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 89/108 APPENDIX A 18.22.905 General requirements. 1)When Special Reports Are Required. The administrator may require a special report or reports if any portion of a proposed development or use has the potential to negatively impact a critical area or encroach upon a buffer, and that impact or encroachment requires mitigation, consistent with the standards found in this chapter. 2) Standard Requirements. Special reports shall be prepared for review and approval by the administrator. In addition to specific requirements of particular special reports described in this article, each special report shall describe narratively and show graphically if applicable, the following:9 a) The proposed activity, location and dimensions; b) Existing site conditions and property boundaries preferably on a scaled site plan with structures, features and geographic location described and graphically depicted; and, c) All Critical areas and their buffers on the project site. d)Assess potential impacts to critical areas function and values per the specific requirements described in this article for each critical area type; e) Propose mitigation for unavoidable losses and impacts to critical areas; f) Identify amount of and limits of clearing, grading, and impervious surface on a Stormwater Calculation Worksheet, if applicable; and, g) Present photographs of the project site. 3) Special reports shall be valid for five years from the date the report was prepared and report validity may be extended by the administrator; provided, critical area conditions, including buffer conditions, have not changed since the special report was written. The administrator shall have the authority to require a revised special report, as needed, to satisfy all the provisions of this chapter. 18.22.910 Waivers. The administrator may waive the requirement for a special report in limited circumstances when an applicant demonstrates all of the following: 1) The proposal involved will not affect the critical area in a manner contrary to the goals, purposes, and objectives of this code; and, 2) The minimum protection standards required by this chapter are satisfied. 18.22.915 Retaining consultants. Jefferson County may retain consultants to assist in the review of special reports outside the range of staff expertise. The applicant shall pay for the costs of retaining said consultants. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 90/108 APPENDIX A 18.22.920 Acceptance of special reports. 1) The administrator shall verify the accuracy and sufficiency of all special reports. 2) If the administrator finds that a special report does not accurately reflect site conditions, or does not incorporate appropriate protections mechanisms, the administrator shall cite evidence that demonstrates where the special report is insufficient or in error. The applicant may then revise and resubmit the special report. 18.22.930 Critical aquifer recharge area reports. 1) General. Critical aquifer recharge area reports serve as the primary means for Jefferson County to verify the accuracy of its critical aquifer recharge area map and to determine specific aquifer protection measures to be applied to prevent significant adverse impacts to groundwater quality, and in some cases water quantity. A critical aquifer recharge report shall be prepared when required in Article III (critical aquifer recharge areas). 2) Standards for Critical Aquifer Recharge Report or Hydrogeologic Evaluation. A critical aquifer recharge area report or a hydrogeologic evaluation shall be made by a hydrogeologist. The critical aquifer recharge report shall include: a)A detailed description of how the project, including all processes and other activities have the potential to impact groundwater recharge or for contaminating groundwater; b)A hydrogeologic evaluation that includes, at a minimum: i) A description of the hydrogeologic setting of the aquifer region; ii) Site location, topography, drainage, and surface water bodies; iii) Soils and geologic units underlying the site; iv) Groundwater characteristics of the area, including flow direction and gradient, and existing groundwater quality; v) The location and characteristics of wells and springs within 1,000 feet of the site; and, vi)An evaluation of existing groundwater recharge. c)A contaminant transport analysis for the uppermost groundwater supply aquifer assuming an accidental spill or release of project-specific contaminants or on-site sewage discharge, or both if applicable; d) A discussion and evaluation that details available on-site spill response and containment equipment, employee spill response training, and emergency service coordination measures; e) Best management practices to minimize exposure of permeable surfaces to potential pollutants and to prevent degradation of groundwater quality; and, f) Demonstrate compliance with applicable protection standards in Section 18.22.330. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 91/108 APPENDIX A g) Requirements for a monitoring program with financial guarantees/assurances that the monitoring program will be implemented. 3)County Review. Critical aquifer recharge report or hydrogeologic evaluation shall be forwarded to the Jefferson County department of public health for technical review. The county may request additional information in order to determine the adequacy of the reports and may rely on input from Washington Department of Ecology. 4) Conditions for Mitigation Identified in the Critical Aquifer Recharge Report or Hydrogeologic Evaluation. The administrator shall determine appropriate permit conditions as identified in the critical aquifer recharge report or hydrogeologic evaluation to mitigate the impacts of proposed activities to critical aquifer recharge areas. 18.22.940 Frequently flooded area reports. 1) Habitat Assessment Required. A habitat assessment shall be submitted ifq anyportion of the proposed project occurs within a Special Flood Hazard Area (floodplain), as mapped by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2) Standards for Habitat Assessment. a) In addition to the general requirements found at JCC 18.22.905, frequently flooded area reports shall be based on 2013 FEMA Region 10 guidance document entitled Regional Guidance for Floodplain Habitat Assessment and Mitigation in the Puget Sound Basin (or as amended by FEMA). b) Habitat Assessments also shall be prepared to comply with Article III of this chapter and the flood damage prevention ordinance, as codified in Chapter 15.15 JCC. 18.22.945 Geologically hazardous area reports. 1) Standards for All Geological Assessments. a) Must be Based on Site Conditions. Recommendations for earthwork, clearing or siting structures in geologically hazardous areas shall be based on existing site conditions rather than measures that have not yet been successfully approved, designed, or constructed (e.g., slope recontouring, slope retaining walls, vegetation improvements, bulkheads, etc.). b) Limits on Shoreline Bulkheads and Retaining Walls. Shoreline bulkheads and retaining walls may only be utilized as an engineering solution where it can be demonstrated that: i) An existing residential structure or other permitted existing public or private structures or public facilities such as roads or highways cannot be safely maintained without such measures; ii) Other nonstructural methods of beach stabilization have been considered and determined infeasible; and, iii) The resulting stabilization structure is the minimum necessary to provide stability for the existing structure and appurtenances. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 92/108 APPENDIX A c) Minor Repair Activities on Existing Permitted Structures. Minor repair activities on existing permitted structures (i.e., those that do not involve design modifications, changes in structure location, or demolition or abandonment of failed structure and replacement with new structure) are not subject to the project submittal standards in subsections (4) and (5). 2) Project Submittal Standards for Geological Reports. A geological report is required for site development proposals that involve development activity or the installation of structures within a geologically hazardous area, or as otherwise required but do not involve or require engineering design recommendations. The following minimum information is required: a) Site information regarding the critical areas designations that affect site features; b) Description of surface and subsurface conditions, including ground materials, vegetation, surface drainage, groundwater, and a preliminary geologic hazard assessment which includes the locations of structures and the identification of the slope and/or coastal processes occurring at the site and factors that contribute to them; c) Review of available site information, literature, and mapping; d) Detailed description of slope and other topographic features; e) Conceptual siting of structures and general recommendations, which include methods and practices that avoid and/or reduce slope and shore impacts. Minimum recommendations should include upland and slope drainage control, groundwater control, site vegetation management, and erosion control; f) A description of how the proposal complies with the clearing, grading, excavation, and stormwater requirements in JCC 18.30.060 and JCC 18.30.070, and the current version of the Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington; g)A description of potential effects of the proposal on stormwater quantity, quality, and runoff patterns post-construction; h) A clear statement whether or not the proposal will affect or alter water movement to the geologically hazardous area and its critical areas buffer if the proposal is implemented; and, i) Identify measures to avoid or minimize alteration of stormwater runoff patterns post- construction. 3) Project Submittal Standards for Geotechnical Reports. A geotechnical report is required when the department or a geological report determines that a proposal requires additional site information such as engineering design recommendations, slope stability analysis, subsurface exploration and testing, coastal process analyses, or construction recommendations. Depending on the level of activity proposed, the geotechnical report will either be a more limited geotechnical slope evaluation report or a full geotechnical design investigation report as described below. a) Geotechnical Slope Evaluation Report. A geotechnical slope evaluation report is required when slope stability analyses are confined to addressing only existing surface and/or drainage conditions, including the relationship of natural and constructed slope features to proposed 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 93/108 APPENDIX A changes in environmental conditions such as drainage, vegetation removal and slope geometry. The following minimum information is required: i) All the information required under subsection (2) (Project Submittal Standards for Geological Reports); ii) Subsurface data, exploration logs, and testing data, when required by the geotechnical engineer; iii) Estimated (or surveyed) site plan with ground surface profiles and typical cross- sections; iv) Relative location of ordinary high water (OHW) on the surface profile and cross- sections, where applicable; v) Soil strength parameters; vi) Stability analysis of existing site; v) Analysis of the relationship of vegetation and slope stability; and, vi) Conceptual site development plans and cross-sections. b) Geotechnical Design Investigation Report. A geotechnical design investigation report is required for site development activities that propose design and construction measures at the slope crest, face and/or toe. If a designed structure does not impact slope stability or coastal processes, the report will not be required to perform all items listed under this section, as long as each item is addressed and the report details why a particular item does not apply. The report shall include all items considered necessary by the engineer to fully address the engineering design requirements of the site. The following minimum information is required: i)All the information required under subsection (1)(a) of this section (Geotechnical Slope Evaluation Report); ii) Geotechnical requirements and measures to reduce risks; iii)Geotechnical criteria used for any designs including all critical dimensions, lateral earth pressures, soil bearing pressures, location, and limits of structures on or near the slope, maximum constructed slope angles, minimum soil reinforcement embedment, soil compaction requirements, and structure heights; iv) Temporary construction slope stability recommendations and analysis of proposed final site stability measures; v) Required construction specifications and construction monitoring procedures; vi) Revegetation and surface and groundwater management requirements; vii) Evaluation of erosion potential, recommendations for erosion avoidance and any proposed mitigation measures; 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 94/108 APPENDIX A viii) Detailed tabulation of all basic geotechnical engineering test results pertinent to design and construction, and when required for clarification, detailed examples of tests conducted for the project; and, ix) Information outlined in the geotechnical design investigation report site evaluation checklist required in subsection (d). c) Additional Requirements for Projects in Landslide-prone Geologically Hazardous Areas. When a project is located within a landslide-prone geologically hazardous area, the following additional project submittal requirements shall apply: i) Erosion Control Information. An evaluation of the erosion potential on the site during and after construction is required. The evaluation shall include recommendations for mitigation, including retention of vegetative buffers and a revegetation program. The geotechnical engineer shall provide a statement identifying buffer areas at the top or toe of a slope based on geotechnical site constraints and the impacts of proposed construction methods on the erosion potential of the slope. ii) Seismic Information. The geotechnical engineer shall submit a statement that the design criteria consider the one-in-one-hundred-year seismic event (an earthquake ground motion that has a forty percent probability of exceedance in fifty years). Calculations of soil bearing capacity, general soil stability, and wall lateral earth pressures shall be adjusted to reflect a one-in-one-hundred-year seismic event and the structural plans for the project shall be reviewed by the geotechnical engineer for consistency with these design criteria: Analysis for the one-in-one-hundred-year seismic event shall be based on a near-crustal event having an assumed magnitude of 6.5 and occurring directly below the site. Based on regional studies performed by others, the department will allow the use of the following minimum general values of horizontal peak ground accelerations for this event: a = 0.2g for fill, alluvial soils a = 0.17g for till, firm glaciated soils a = 0.15g for rock. The appropriateness of the above accelerations shall be confirmed by the geotechnical engineer based on the actual site characteristics. Reduction in the above values may be considered when supported by the appropriate analytical evidence. Slope stability, lateral pressures, and liquefaction of the site shall be assessed by using subsurface soil, rock, and groundwater conditions, as well as the seismic parameters discussed above. iii) Recommendations on Relative Site Stability. The geotechnical engineer shall make recommendations as to which portions of the site are the least prone to instability and the preferred location of the structure. The limits of any area proposed for grading activity shall be identified. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 95/108 APPENDIX A iv) Construction Season Limitation. In general, no excavation will be permitted in landslide-prone geologically hazardous areas during the typically wet winter months. When excavation is proposed, including the maintenance of open temporary slopes, between October 1st and April 30th, technical analysis shall be provided to ensure that no environmental harm, threat to adjacent properties, or safety issues would result. In addition, recommendations for temporary erosion control and shoring/mitigating measures shall be provided. The technical analysis shall consist of plans showing mitigation techniques and a technical memorandum from the geotechnical engineer. v) Revisions to Geotechnical Report. Further recommendations shall be provided by the geotechnical engineer should there be additions or exceptions to the original recommendations based on the plans, site conditions, or other supporting data. If the geotechnical engineer who revises the plans and specifications is not the same engineer who prepared the geotechnical report,the new engineer shall, in a letter to the department, express his or her agreement or disagreement with the recommendations in the geotechnical report and state whether the plans and specifications conform to his or her recommendations. vi) Plan and Specification Review. The geotechnical engineer shall submit a statement that, in his or her judgment, the plans and specifications (if prepared by others) conform to the recommendations in the geotechnical report and that all portions of the site which are disturbed or impacted by the proposed development have appropriate measures or specifications that permit construction to occur while addressing slope stability so that the work does not create additional risk. The statement shall also indicate whether or not a relative gain in slope stability will be achieved after construction is complete. vii)Construction Inspection.A final inspection report shall be provided by the geotechnical engineer stating that construction has or has not implemented the design recommendations of the geotechnical report and evaluating any deviation from the design recommendations. d) Geotechnical Design Investigation Report — Site Evaluation Checklist. The following are report guidelines for geotechnical design investigation reports: i) Project information: A) Site owner name; B) Project proponent name; C) Ordinary high-water mark (OHWM) where applicable; and, D) Critical areas designations affecting site features. ii) Project description, including: A) Description of proposed structures, site improvements, and adverse impact avoidance and reduction methods; and, B) Location and total area of the construction zone. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 96/108 APPENDIX A The site evaluation checklist information shall be included as part of the geotechnical design investigation report. All items listed above must be addressed in the report. However, the above guidelines are not intended to be all-inclusive. It is the responsibility of the geotechnical engineer to address all factors which in their geotechnical design investigation report is relevant to the project. For any items in the site evaluation checklist that are not relevant to a project, information shall be provided to demonstrate why the site evaluation checklist items are not relevant to a project. 4) Results of Department's Review. The department shall review the geological assessment and either: a) Accept the geological assessment and approve the application; or, b) Reject the geological assessment and require revisions or additional information. 18.22.950 Habitat Management Reports. 1) General. When required in Article VI, a site visit conducted by a wildlife biologist is required to determine if a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area (FWHCA) or buffer is present. Based on the site visit, the biologist shall prepare a habitat reconnaissance letter or a habitat management plan and include all of the required information described in JCC 18.22.905. Habitat reconnaissance letters and habitat management plans shall be prepared based on requirements in Article VI (fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas), the general report requirements of 18.22.905, and the criteria specified in subsections (3) and (4) below. 3) Habitat Reconnaissance Letter. A habitat reconnaissance letter shall be prepared and submitted only if all project components, including areas of temporary impact and the limits of construction, are outside of all FWHCA buffers, as described in this chapter; provided, no critical areas buffer reduction is proposed. A habitat reconnaissance letter shall document that proposed projects because of their location will not impact FWHCA and will include the following: a)A description of all FWHCAs and buffers on the property; b) Narratively and graphically present the distance of all FWHCAs from the limits of clearing, as shown on a site plan. The site plan used during the site visit shall be included in the habitat review letter; and, c) Photographs of the site and the FWHCAs. 4) Habitat Management Plan.A habitat management plan shall be prepared and submitted if any portion of the proposed activity, including areas of temporary impact and areas within the limits of clearing, are within a FWHCA , as described in this chapter, or if a critical areas buffer reduction is proposed. A habitat management plan shall address the following: a) Detailed description of all proposed project components relative to on-site FWHCAs, other on-site development, and limits of clearing; b) State whether or not in-water work is proposed, and if so, describe timing and methods of construction; 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 97/108 APPENDIX A c) Date site visits were made and date report was completed; d) Detailed description of the field investigation results, including habitat types present on the property, habitat conditions with FWHCAs, location of native vegetation on the property, and location of non-native or invasive vegetation on the property. The habitat management report should indicate if the critical areas extend offsite; e) If the project area is identified as potential habitat for threatened or endangered species, , methods used to determine presence or absence of listed species, methods used to determine if appropriate habitat occurs onsite or in the vicinity of the site, and results of the field investigation. f) In addition to complying with the clearing, grading, excavation, and stormwater requirements in JCC 18.30.060 and 18.30.070, and the current Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington, describe any potential effects of the proposed activity on stormwater quantity, quality, and runoff patterns post-construction. The report must clearly indicate if the proposal will affect or alter water movement to the FWHCA and buffer if the proposal is implemented and identify measures to avoid or minimize alteration of stormwater runoff patterns post-construction. g) Identify all potential impacts of the proposed activity on FWHCAs. The habitat management report shall include: i) Mitigation Sequencing. Describe measures to avoid and minimize impacts to FWHCAs. For any unavoidable impacts, describe and justify all project components that cannot avoid impacting the FWHCA. For unavoidable impacts, mitigation plans must be prepared in accordance with (k) of this subsection.(ii) Types of Impacts. All potential impacts to FWHCAs and their functions and values shall be identified and described in the habitat management report. Habitat management reports shall consider direct impacts, indirect impacts, permanent impacts, temporary (long-term and short-term) impacts, and cumulative impacts. iii) Impact Area. The area (square footage) of potential impact shall be quantified for each FWHCA. At a minimum, impact area shall include FWHCA that occurs within the limits of clearing, as shown on the site plan. h) Provide a detailed mitigation plan for any unavoidable impacts. Mitigation plans shall include: i) Description and scaled, graphic rendering of the mitigation proposal and of the area, suitability, and objectives of the area to compensate for impact area and functions. iv) A table identifying impact areas (in square feet) and functions affected for each FWHCA and buffer that also identifies mitigation areas (in square feet) and functions. The table shall clearly show a link between potential impacts(area and function) and proposed mitigation (area and function). v) Mitigation plans shall include performance standards that are applicable to the objectives of the mitigation effort. Monitoring shall be required annually for five years and 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 98/108 APPENDIX A quantifiable performance standards shall be specified in the plan for each of the five years of monitoring. vi) A planting plan, when appropriate, that lists the species to be planted, including quantity and planting density of each species to be installed. vii) Monitoring schedule, monitoring methods, and monitoring data to be collected shall be described. viii) Contingency measures shall be described. If any performance standard is not met, the administrator shall require contingency measures be implemented and may extend the monitoring period beyond five years to ensure FWHCAs are adequately mitigated and protected. xii) Photographs of the site and the FWHCAs. 5) Habitat management plans prepared for any unavoidable development activity within a FWHCA or the inner 75 percent of a standard buffer shall accompany either a financially bonded critical area stewardship plan or critical areas variance application or reasonable economic use exception in JCC 18.22.250 or 260. 6) In-lieu Fee Program. A mitigation plan shall not be required if an actively managed ILF program, is used to mitigate project impacts, provided that the administrator has approved the use of ILF to achieve compensatory FWHCA mitigation. 18.22.955 Process and requirements for designating habitats of local importance as critical areas. 1) Purpose. This section describes the process for designating species and habitats of local importance that are not covered by the federal and state sensitive, threatened, or endangered species regulations. Accordingly, this section details the requirements for designating and monitoring species and habitats of local importance, as well as removing such species and habitats from designation if necessary. 2) Definition. The use of the term "habitat" in this section means a place or type of site where a plant or animal naturally or normally lives and grows, and includes areas used by a species during any life stage at any time of the year." 3) Procedure for Designation — Generally. An application/nomination to designate a habitat of local importance as a critical area shall be processed according to the procedures for Type V land use decisions established in Chapter 18.40 JCC. 4) Nominations/Applications. Any person, organization, or Jefferson County agency may nominate and apply for designation a species or habitat of local importance. A nominating person or organization must be a resident of, or headquartered in, Jefferson County. 5) Nomination/Application Submittal. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 99/108 APPENDIX A a) The applicant shall provide information demonstrating that the species or habitat is native to Jefferson County, existing on or before the date of adoption of the regulations codified in this chapter. b) All nominations/applications for designation of a species/habitat of local significance shall include the following: i) Identification of the species including its scientific and locally common name(s); ii) Identification of the geographic location, including Jefferson County parcel numbers, and extent of the habitat associated with a nominated species or the nominated habitat itself if not associated with a nominated species; a map of an appropriate scale to properly describe the location and extent of the habitat will accompany the nomination, as well as geo-referencing information sufficient to allow mapping of the habitat site in the county GIS mapping system; iii) The status of the species or the occurrence of the type of habitat in surrounding counties and in the rest of the state has been considered in making this nomination; iv) A management strategy for the species or habitat; v) Indications as to whether the proposed management strategy has been peer reviewed, and if so, how this was done and by whom; vi)Where restoration of habitat is proposed, a specific plan, including how the restoration will be funded, must be provided as part of the nomination; vii) Recommendations for allowed, exempt, and regulated activities within the area; viii) Recommended buffer and setback requirements and their justification; ix) Seasonal requirements; x) A monitoring plan must be practical and achievable and include the following: A) Baseline data and a description of what measurements will be used to determine the success of the project. The plan shall include the criteria and time period required to evaluate the success of the plan; B) A contingency plan for failure; and, C) A list of all parcels not included in the nomination but affected by the monitoring process. xi) The nomination must also include an economic impact, cost, and benefits analysis. The nomination must also include an analysis of alternative solutions to formal designation of the habitat of local importance as a regulated critical area under this chapter. c) The applicant shall be responsible for paying all fees and all expenses incurred by Jefferson County to process the application. 6) Review and Approval Criteria. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 100/108 APPENDIX A a) Species nominated for designation under this section must satisfy the following criteria: i) Local populations that are in danger of extirpation based on documented trends since the adoption of the Growth Management Act; ii) The species is sensitive to habitat manipulation; iii) The species or habitat has commercial, game, or other special value such as locally rare species; iv)The nomination includes an analysis of the proposal using best available science; and, v)The nomination specifies why protection by other county, state or federal policies, laws, regulations or nonregulatory tools is inadequate to prevent degradation of the species or habitat and for which management strategies are practicable, and describes why, without designation and protection, there is a likelihood that the species will not maintain and reproduce over the long term, or that a unique habitat will be lost. b) Habitats nominated for designation under this section must satisfy the following criteria: i)Where a habitat is nominated to protect a species, the use of the habitat by that species must be documented or be highly likely or the habitat is proposed to be restored with the consent of the affected property owner so that it will be suitable for use by the species; and, long-term persistence of the species in Jefferson County and adjoining counties is dependent on the protection, maintenance or restoration of the habitat; ii)Areas nominated to protect a particular habitat must represent either high quality native habitat or habitat that has an excellent potential to recover to a high-quality condition and which is either of limited availability or highly vulnerable to alteration; and, iii) The nomination specifies the specific habitat features to be protected (e.g., nest sites, breeding areas, nurseries, etc.). In the case of proposed wildlife corridors, the nomination shall specify those features that are required for the corridor to remain viable to support and protect the nominated species. 7) Review and Approval Process. a) The department of community development shall determine whether the application submittal is complete. If deemed complete, the department shall evaluate the proposal for compliance with the approval criteria in this section and make a recommendation to the planning commission based on those criteria. The department shall also notify all parcel owners affected of the terms and contents of the proposal. b) Upon receipt of a staff report and recommendation from the department, the planning commission shall hold a public hearing, and make a recommendation to the board of commissioners based upon the approval criteria in this section. c) The Jefferson County board of commissioners shall consider the recommendation transmitted by the planning commission at a regularly scheduled public meeting, and may then adopt an ordinance formally approving the designation. Should the board wish to vary 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 101/108 APPENDIX A from the planning commission recommendation and alter or reject the application, such action may only occur following a separate public hearing conducted by the board. d) Upon approval, the ordinance designating and regulating the species or habitat of local importance shall be codified in this article for public information and implementation by the department, and a notice to title shall be placed upon all parcels affected by the designation. e) Each ordinance creating a species or habitat of local importance shall include periodic review or reassessment of the initial designation. The length of the periodic review may be dependent on the characteristics of the species or habitat. 8) Removal from Designation. Species or habitats of local significance may be removed at any time; provided, they no longer meet the criteria in subsection (5) of this section (e.g., as a result of a natural catastrophe or climatic change event); and provided further, that the procedural requirements of this section and the procedural requirements established for Type V land use decisions within Chapter 18.40 JCC are met. 18.22.960 Wetland reports. 1)General.When required by Article VII, a site visit conducted by a qualified wetland professional is required to determine if a wetland is present. Based on the site visit, a wetland reconnaissance letter or a wetland delineation report shall be prepared. Wetland reconnaissance letters and wetland delineation reports shall be prepared based on requirements Article VII (wetlands), the general report requirements of JCC 18.22.905, and the criteria specified in subsections (3) and 4) below. If a proposed activity is unavoidable and occurs within a wetland or the inner 75 percent of a wetland buffer the wetland reports shall accompany either a financially bonded critical area stewardship plan or critical area variance application in JCC 18.22.250 or reasonable economic use exception in JCC 18.22.260. 3) Wetland Reconnaissance Letter. A wetland reconnaissance letter shall be prepared and submitted only if all the project components are at least 300 feet from areas of temporary impact and the limits of clearing; provided, no buffer reduction is proposed. A wetland reconnaissance letter shall document that proposed projects because of their location will not impact wetlands and will include the following: a) Describe all wetlands and buffers on the property; b) Narratively and graphically describe the distance of all wetlands from the limits of clearing, as shown on the site plan; The site plan used during the site visit shall be included in the wetland reconnaissance letter; c) Provide a wetland delineation field data form for all potential wetland areas assessed; e) Plot locations shall be shown on the site plan that is attached to the wetland reconnaissance letter; and, f) Photographs of the site and the wetlands. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 102/108 APPENDIX A 4) Wetland Delineation Report. A wetland delineation report shall be prepared and submitted if any portion of the proposed activity is within 300 feet of areas of temporary impact and areas within the limits of clearing, or if a buffer reduction is proposed. A wetland delineation report shall address the following: a) Date site visits were made and date report was completed. b) Summary of information reviewed (such as maps and reports) to determine the potential for wetlands to be present. Based on this review, describe wetlands within 300 feet of the proposed activity. c) Detailed description of the field evaluation results, location and types of wetlands identified, and buffer conditions. Discuss all on-site wetlands identified, potential off-site wetlands, and wetland ratings and buffer widths. Indicate locations of wetland boundary flagging and plot flagging, including flag color, type, and number. d) In addition to complying with the clearing, grading, excavation, and stormwater requirements in JCC 18.30.060 and 18.30.070, and the 2014 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (or as amended), describe any potential effects of the proposed activity on stormwater quantity, quality, and runoff patterns post-construction. The report must clearly indicate if the proposal will affect or alter water movement to the wetland if the proposal is implemented and identify measures to avoid or minimize alteration of stormwater runoff patterns post-construction. e) Describe how the proposal complies with all the requirements of Article VI (Wetlands). f)Wetland rating form for each wetland identified shall be included in the wetland report. g) Figure showing mitigation areas on the property. Square footage of each mitigation area shall be shown on the figure. If buffer averaging is proposed, the area of increase shall be shown relative to the area of decrease on the figure. h) Photographs of the site and the wetlands or buffer. 5)A mitigation plan shall not be required if an actively managed ILF program, is approved by the administrator and used to mitigate project impacts. 18.22.965 Critical area stewardship plans. 1) Property Owner Election. Property owners may elect to develop site-specific critical area stewardship plans (CASPs) as an alternative to the prescriptive requirements of Article VI (Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (FWHCAs)) and Article VII (Wetlands) of this chapter. 2) The administrator may approve CASPs for critical area buffer reductions greater than 25 percent; provided, the project does not require a reasonable economic use variance. 3) Review and Approval of CASPs. The administrator shall be responsible for reviewing and approving submitted CASPs. The administrator may, at the administrator's discretion, seek technical assistance from the Jefferson County conservation district, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife or the Washington Department of Ecology when reviewing CASPs. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 103/108 APPENDIX A 4) Applicability and Limitations. The following provisions define the applicability and limitations of the CASP: a) CASPs may be used in any zoning designation if the provisions of this article can be met. CASPs may not be used in the urban growth area if a buffer reduction implemented while using transitional zoning (i.e., rural zoning designation prior to connection with a sewer system) has the potential to preclude future density requirements. The overall goal of the CASP is to maintain existing functions and values of the watershed and subbasin, while addressing the needs and desires of the property owner. b) CASPs can be applied to properties one-quarter acre or larger. c) CASPs are only applicable to fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas and associated buffers (Article VI) or wetlands and associated buffers (Article VII). d) CASPs must provide equal or greater protection of critical area functions and values than the prescriptive standards of buffers and setbacks. e) CASPs will be administered as a Type I permit, per Chapter 18.40 JCC. 5) Implementation. a) A CASP permit is valid for the same timeframe as the underlying permit (e.g., building permit, septic permit, shoreline permit). If the underlying permit does not have a specified expiration date or if the CASP application is a standalone application, the CASP permit shall be valid for three years from the date the CASP permit is issued. A CASP permit shall not be considered valid beyond five years from the date the CASP permit is issued. If the underlying permit remains valid beyond five years, the CASP permit shall be considered null and void. Once the permit has expired, it shall not be renewed. b) The applicant shall record a notice title for any approved mitigation at the Auditor's Office and shall post a mitigation performance bond with the department. The administrator shall provide the necessary paperwork to the applicants.Assuming the administrator does not need to designate staff (or contract with other qualified professionals) to ensure that maintenance and monitoring are completed as required by this section, the performance bond is to be refunded to the applicant at the end of the specified monitoring period or when all performance standards are met, whichever is greater. The CASP permit is a conditional approval and no other permits (such as building, shoreline, septic) shall be approved until the applicant has recorded the notice to title and posted the performance bond. 6)As-built plan requirement.An as-built plan shall be prepared by a wetland specialist describing the action taken to implement the CASP. This as-built plan shall include: a) A contour map describing final contours if grading is required; b) A quantitative description of the vegetation planted; c) Establishment of two or more permanent photo documentation stations with established bearings and monuments to ensure that subsequent photographs depict the same landscape for comparative purposes; 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 104/108 APPENDIX A d) Additional photographic documentation that shows the condition of mitigation area(s) once CASP mitigation has been implemented; e) A site plan showing the location of the mitigation areas relative to the mitigation proposal as presented in the approved GASP report and to the CASP permit conditions; and, f) Building final certificate of occupancy or septic final shall not be issued until the applicant has submitted an as-built showing compliance with this article, the approved GASP report, and all CASP permit conditions. 7) Contingency Plan Requirement. A contingency PI n is requireduired describing how the CASP might be modified if monitoring indicates a failure to meet the stated goals, or a need to modify the goals because of events outside the landowner's control (e.g., damage associated with a wildlife). For instance, if one of the planted species of vegetation proves ill adapted to the environment and fails to survive or thrive to the extent needed to provide the intended function then alternative species should be identified. In general, plans should initially plant at greater than 120 percent of the specified final density of shrubs and trees. The contingency plan should call for either supplemental planting when the density falls below the prescribed final density or it could call for the planting of alternate specie(s). 8) Failure to submit required reports. Failure to submit a report required under this article shall constitute a failure to comply with the terms of the permit. 9) Performance Bond. The administrator shall authorize the use of the performance bond to ensure maintenance and monitoring are completed to comply with permit conditions. In the event the performance bond amount is insufficient to ensure compliance with the permit (or if activities on the site have negatively affected the mitigation area(s), the failure to comply with CASP permit conditions shall be processed by the administrator pursuant to Chapter 18.50 JCC (Enforcement). 10) Waiver. The administrator may waive portions of a critical area stewardship plan (CASP) if, in the administrator's opinion, critical area functions and values will not be adversely affected by a proposed activity. 11) Recording of Approved CASP Required. An approved CASP must be recorded on the property deed (recorded with the Jefferson County auditor) and must remain in effect unless replaced by a new or updated CASP approved by the county. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 105/108 APPENDIX A 18.30.180 On-site sewage disposal best management practices in critical aquifer recharge areas. All land uses identified in Article III of Chapter 18.22 JCC and special aquifer recharge protection areas that are also classified as susceptible aquifer recharge areas (as defined Chapter 18.22 JCC) shall be designated areas of special concern pursuant to Title 246 WAC. Consistent with Title 246 WAC, the Jefferson County Board of Health determines the best management practices (BMPs) to meet minimum on-site sewage standards within both a susceptible aquifer recharge area and a special aquifer recharge protection area (as identified in Article III of Chapter 18.22 JCC). The current BMPs, subject to modification from the Jefferson County Board of Health, are: 1) The contaminants of concern, bacteria and nitrogen, are not fully treated (removed)from wastewater in Type 1 and 2 soils (excessively coarse and coarse)with conventional gravity fed on- site sewage systems. To more adequately protect the groundwater in these areas from contamination by these elements the standards in this section have been developed utilizing a combination of treatment systems and land use density parameters. 2)Where land use densities are such that adequate aquifer protection is not ensured, best management practices for on-site sewage shall apply to new development, or expansion (as defined in WAC 246-272A-0010) of existing development when an on-site sewage disposal system is installed. a) Tables 1 and 2 shall be used to determine the type of on-site sewage disposal system required and the minimum lot size in different soil types where public water is available. Lot size requirements are taken from the Washington State On-Site Sewage Code, Chapter 246- 272A WAC, Table X. Soil textural classifications and minimum standards for methods of effluent distribution for soil types and depths are taken from Chapter 246-272A WAC, Tables V and VI, respectively. b) In critical aquifer recharge areas, no on-site sewage permit will be issued where public water systems are not available on lots less than one acre, except as permitted in subsection 2)(c) of this section. c)When lots sizes do not meet the area requirements specified in Tables 1 and 2, and lot consolidation is impracticable, an approved composting toilet and greywater treatment system may be permitted. Permits for composting toilets shall include a condition requiring further treatment of toilet waste at the Port Townsend composting facility or other approved site. On- site use or disposal of the toilet-generated compost shall not be allowed. d) BMPs shall be updated as new technologies are reviewed and approved by Jefferson County public health and/or Washington Department of Health. Criteria for review of new or existing systems will include, but not be limited to, adequate laboratory evidence provided by the system proprietor of a minimum of 50 percent total nitrogen reduction prior to final disposal. Currently, acceptable BMPs include: i) Intermittent sand filter followed by a shallow pressure distribution system (also meets Treatment Level B); ii) Recirculating gravel filter; 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 106/108 APPENDIX A iii) Composting and incinerating toilets—if these are used, greywater from the facility shall be treated by the method normally required by the site and soil conditions required under Chapter 246-272A WAC. For example: Type 1 soils require Treatment Level B under Chapter 246-272A WAC. Only composting or incinerating toilets on the List of Registered On-Site Treatment and Distribution Products by the Washington Department of Health may be permitted. iv) Treatment units listed in Washington Department of Health Registered Products meeting Treatment Level N. e) Systems that meet Treatment Levels A and B and N are listed and approved by the Washington Department of Health and are available in the List of Registered On-Site Treatment and Distribution Products. Only those systems that meet Treatment Levels specified in Chapter 246-272A WAC and meet Treatment Level N or are listed as nitrogen reduction BMPs (in subsection(2)(c) of this section) meet the standard for critical aquifer recharge area requirements in Type 1 soils. f)Where a question/disagreement regarding the soil texture exists, the following procedure shall be used: i) Sample will be taken in the presence of Jefferson County public health staff. ii) Chain of custody protocol shall be followed. iii) Lab reports shall be sent to Jefferson County environmental health division and the applicant, or applicant's representative, for review. Table 1 On-Site Sewage System Requirements for Sites Using Public Water Sources and Having Three Feet Vertical Separation in Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas Note: "NO3 BMP" refers to the nitrogen reduction best management practices listed in JCC 18.30.180(2)(d) or Treatment Level N in Chapter 246-272A WAC. Soil Type(as defined in Chapter 246-272A WAC) Minimum Lot Size= 1 2 3 4 5 6 1.0 ac Treatment Level A or Pressure Conventional Conventional Conventional Conventional B Distribution Gravity Gravity Gravity Gravity 22,000 sq. Treatment Level A or NO3 BMP Shallow Pressure Shallow Pressure Shallow Pressure Shallow Pressure ft. B that is also listed as Distribution Distribution Distribution Distribution NO3 BMP 0.5 ac Treatment Level A or NO3 BMP Shallow Pressure Shallow Pressure Shallow Pressure 21,780 sq. B that is also listed as Distribution Distribution Distribution ft.) NO3 BMP 20,000 sq. NO3 BMP Shallow Pressure Shallow Pressure Shallow Pressure ft. Distribution Distribution Distribution 18,000 sq. NO3 BMP Shallow Pressure Shallow Pressure ft. Distribution Distribution 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 107/108 APPENDIX A Soil Type(as defined in Chapter 246-272A WAC) Minimum Lot Size2 1 2 3 4 5 6 15,000 sq. NO3 BMP Shallow Pressure ft. Distribution 12,500 sq. NO3 BMP ft. lAs defined in Article Ill of Chapter 18.22 JCC. 2Per unit volume of sewage(450 gallons per day), WAC 246-272A-0010. Table 2 On-Site Sewage System Requirements for Sites Using Public Water Sources and Having Two Feet But Less Than Three Feet of Vertical Separation,for Development in Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas3 Note: "NO3 BMP" refers to the nitrogen reduction best management practices listed in JCC 18.30.180 (2)(d) or Treatment Level N in Chapter 246-272A WAC. Soil Type(as defined in Chapter 246-272A WAC) Minimum Lot Size'1 2 3 4 5 6 1.0 ac Treatment Level or B Pressure Pressure Pressure Pressure Pressure Distribution Distribution Distribution Distribution Distribution 22,000 sq. ft. Treatment Level A or B NO3 BMP Shallow Shallow Shallow Shallow that is also listed as Pressure Pressure Pressure Pressure NO3 BMP Distribution Distribution Distribution Distribution 0.5 ac Treatment Level A or B NO3 BMP Shallow Shallow Shallow 21,780 sq. that is also listed as Pressure Pressure Pressure ft.) NO3 BMP Distribution Distribution Distribution 20,000 NO3 BMP Shallow Shallow sq. ft. Pressure Pressure Distribution Distribution 18,000 NO3 BMP Shallow Shallow sq. ft. Pressure Pressure Distribution Distribution 15,000 NO3 BMP Shallow sq. ft. Pressure Distribution 12,500 NO3 BMP sq. ft. 3As defined in Article Ill of Chapter 18.22 JCC. Per unit volume of sewage (450 gallons per day), WAC 246-272A-0010. The Jefferson County Board of Health has the authority to modify these BMPs, provided there is compliance with Title 246 WAC. The above BMPs are in effect until modified by the Jefferson County Board of Health, consistent with Title 246 WAC. 2020 Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Review and Update Page 108/108 APPENDIX B Jefferson County Critical Areas Ordinance Periodic Update:Addendum to the 2008 Record of Best Available Science Benedict,C.and J.Shaw. 2012. Agricultural Waterway Buffer Study: Whatcom County, Washington. Funded by King County Water and Land Resources Division, King Conservation District,Whatcom Conservation District, and Washington State University Extension. Citizens for Local Food. 2012. Jefferson County Farmer Survey. Coastal Geologic Services, Inc. 2016. Jefferson County Critical Areas Ordinance Update—Addendum to Jefferson County BAS Report for Coastal Geologically Hazardous Areas. Prepared for Jefferson County. East Jefferson Watershed Council. 2011. Watershed Management Plan and Detailed Implementation Plan for the Quilcene-Snow Water Resource Inventory Area(WRIA 17). E.D. Hovee &Company, LLC. 2010. Jefferson county Joint Economic Development Planning: Existing Conditions Report. Prepared for Jefferson County, City of Port Townsend,and Port of Port Townsend. EnviroVision, Herrera Environmental, and Aquatic Habitat Guidelines Program. 2010. Protecting Nearshore Habitat and Functions in Puget Sound. ESA. 2016. Recommendations Report. Prepared for Jefferson County. ESA. 2016. Watershed Characterization Report. Prepared for Jefferson County. ESA. 2015. Critical Areas Ordinance Update: Best Available Science Report. Prepared for Jefferson County. Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2016. Risk Report. Prepared for Jefferson County, including the City of Port Townsend and the Hoh Tribe. GEI Consultants. 2005. Efficacy and Economics of Riparian Buffers on Agricultural Lands—State of Washington—Phase II. Submitted to Washington Agricultural Caucus. GEI Consultants. 2002. Efficacy and Economics of Riparian Buffers on Agricultural Lands. Submitted to: Washington Agricultural Caucus. Golder Associates. 2010. Water Demand and Availability WRIA-Stage 1. Prepared for Public Utility District#1 of Jefferson County& the WRIA 17 Planning Unit. Jefferson County Conservation District. 2015. Chimacum Watershed Water Quality and Fishes: A Comprehensive Review. Prepared for Washington State Conservation Commission. Olympia, Washington. Jefferson County Conservation District. 2011. Fecal Coliform Monitoring Results and Best Management Practices in the Discovery Bay Watershed: 2007—2011. Prepared for Jefferson County Department of Public Health. 1 APPENDIX B Jefferson County Conservation District. 2011. Water Quality Monitoring Report: Chimacum Creek Clean Water Project. Prepared for Department of Ecology Water Quality Program. Jefferson County Conservation District. 2009. Water Quality Screening Report: July 2007-June 2009. Prepared for Washington State Conservation Commission. Jefferson County Conservation District. 2004. Chimacum Watershed: Agriculture, Fish& Wildlife Protection Plan. Jefferson County Public Health. 2011. Discovery Bay Clean Water Project: Final Report. Jefferson County Public Health and Jefferson County Conservation District. 2017. Final Report for Hood Canal Priority Basins Project. Kallestad,J. and M.E.Swanson. 2009. Riparian Buffers for Western Washington Agriculture. Tilth Producers Farm Walk Series. King County. 2014. Assessing Land Use Effects and Regulatory Effectiveness on Streams in Rural Watersheds of King County, Washington. Department of Natural Resources and Parks,Water and Land Resources Division, Science and Technical Support Section. National Marine Fisheries Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2008).Endangered Species Act- Section 7 Consultation, Final Biological Opinion, Washington State Fish Passage and Habitat Enhancement Restoration Programmatic Consultation. 2008. Petersen,S., Bell,J., Miller, I.,Jayne, C., Dean, K., Fougerat, M. 2015. Climate Change Preparedness Plan for the North Olympic Peninsula. A Project of the North Olympic Peninsula Resource Conservation & Development Council and the Washington Department of Commerce. Funded by the Environmental Protection Agency. Puget Sound Partnership. 2019. State of the Sound. Olympia, Washington. Ramsar. 2014. Wetlands&Agriculture: Partners for Growth. Rhees,S.S. 2016. Protecting Riparian Areas with Vegetated Buffers. Zoning Practice,9.16. Snohomish Conservation District, NOAA Restoration Center, and Pennsylvania State University. 2015. The Working Buffer Opportunity: A Proposal for Ecologically Sound and Economical Viable Riparian Buffers on Agricultural Lands. State of Washington Office of the Attorney General. 2018. Advisory Memorandum and Recommended Process for Evaluating Proposed Regulatory or Adminstrative Actions to Avoid Unconstitutional Takings of Private Property. Thurston County. 2015. Voluntary Stewardship Program: Work Plan Draft. The Association of State Wetland Managers, Inc. 2011. Assessing the Natural and Beneficial Functions of Floodplains: Issues and Approaches: Future Directions. The Salish Sea Pacific Herring Assessment and Management Strategy Team. 2018. Assessment and Management of Pacific Herring in the Salish Sea: Conserving and Recovering a Culturally Significant 2 APPENDIX B and Ecologically Critical Component of the Food Web. Final Report. Prepared for The SeaDoc Society. The William D. Ruckelshaus Center. 2010. Preserving Agricultural Viability and Protecting Critical Areas: Report on the Work of the Agriculture and Critical Areas Committee. Submitted to the Washington State Legislature and Governor Christine Gregoire. U.S.Army Corps of Engineers. 2016. Special Public Notice: Interim Procedures for Competing an Eelgrass Delineation and Characterization Report. U.S. Department of the Interior(U.S. Geological Survey). 2011. Geologic Framework, Groundwater Movement, and Water Budget in the Chimacum Creek Basin and Vicinity,Jefferson, County. Prepared in cooperation with Jefferson County and the Washington State Department of Ecology. Washington State Conservation Commission. 2012. 2012 Implementation and Effectiveness Monitoring Results for the Washington Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP): Plant and Buffer Performance. Washington State Department of Commerce. 2018. Critical Areas Handbook: A Handbook for Reviewing Critical Areas Regulations. Olympia,Washington. Washington State Department of Commerce. 2016. Critical Areas and Agriculture: Review of Development Regulations. Olympia,Washington. Washington State Department of Ecology. 2016. Wetland Guidance for CAO Updates: Western Washington Version. Publication#16-06-001. Olympia,Washington. Washington State Department of Ecology. 2015. Shoreline Master Programs Handbook: Chapter 16, Aquaculture. Publication#11-06-010. Olympia, Washington. Washington State Department of Ecology. 2014. Channel Migration Processes and Patterns in Western Washington: A Synthesis for Floodplain Management and Restoration. Publication#14-06-028. Olympia,Washington. Washington State Department of Ecology. 2018. July 2018 modified sections XX.040 and XX.050— Western Washington and July 2018 Appendix 8-C with modified habitat score ranges. Modifications to Wetland Guidance for CAO updates: Western Washington Version. Washington State Department of Ecology. 2013. Update on Wetland Buffers: The State of the Science. Final Report, October 2013. Publication#13-06-11. Olympia,Washington. Washington State Department of Ecology. 2012. Calculating Credits and Debits for Compensatory Mitigation in Wetlands of Western Washington. Publication#10-06-011. Olympia,Washington, Washington State Department of Ecology. 2010. Wetlands& CAO Updates: Guidance for Small Cities: Western Washington Version. Publication#10-06-002. Olympia,Washington. Washington State Department of Ecology. 2009. Selecting Wetland Mitigation Sites Using a Watershed Approach. Publication#09-06-032. Olympia,Washington. Washington State Department of Ecology. 2008. Making Mitigation Work: The Report of the Mitigation that Works Forum. Publication#08-06-018. Olympia,Washington. 3 APPENDIX B Washington State Department of Ecology. 2006. Wetland Buffers—Summary of Scientific Information. Washington State Department of Ecology. 2005. Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas: Guidance Document. Publication#05-10-028. Olympia,Washington. Washington State Department of Ecology. 2005. Protecting Aquatic Ecosystems: A Guide for Puget Sound Planners to Understand Watershed Processes. Publication#05-06-27. Olympia, Washington. Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2018. Priority Habitats and Species List. Olympia, Washington. Olympia,Washington. Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2018. Riparian Ecosystems, Volume I:Science Synthesis and Management Implications. Olympia,Washington Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2014. Marine Shoreline Design Guidelines. Washington State Aquatic Habitat Guidelines Program. Olympia,Washington. Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2013. Water Crossing Design Guidelines. Aquatic Habitat Guidelines Program. Olympia,Washington. Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2012. Stream Habitat Restoration Guidelines. Washington State Aquatic Habitat Guidelines Program. Olympia, Washington. Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2009. Landscape Planning for Washington's Wildlife: Managing for Biodiversity in Developing Areas. Priority Habitat and Species Guidance Document. Olympia,Washington. Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2009. Land Use Planning for Salmon,Steelhead and Trout: A land use planner's guide to salmonid habitat protection and recovery. Aquatic Habitat Guidelines Program. Olympia,Washington. Washington State Department of Natural Resources. 2010.Washington Natural Heritage Database. Western Environmental Law Center. 2016. Agricultural Pollution in Puget Sound: Inspiration to Change Washington's Reliance on Voluntary Incentive Programs to Save Salmon. Policy Paper. 4 1 SEPA Environmental Checklist Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review May 14, 2021 PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST: Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use “not applicable” or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. INSTRUCTIONS FOR LEAD AGENCIES: Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other suppo rting documents. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSALS: For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B - Environmental May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 2 Elements –that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. A. Background [HELP] 1) Name of proposed project, if applicable: Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review 2) Name of applicant: Jefferson County Community Development Department 3) Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: David Wayne Johnson, djohnson@co.jefferson.wa.us, Jefferson County Community Development Department, 621 Sheridan St, Port Townsend, WA 98368 4) Date checklist prepared: May 14, 2021 5) Agency requesting checklist: Jefferson County Community Development Department 6) Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): ▪ 30-day comment period: May 17, 2021 to June 16, 2021  The County is preparing its periodic review as part of the optional joint review process where the County and the Washington Department of Ecology are developing the draft amendments in coordination and conducting a unified comment period and hearing.  Comments on the SEPA determination will follow the 30-day comment period on the draft Shoreline Master Program amendments. See https://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/1481/Shoreline- Master-Program-Periodic-Review.  The hearing is scheduled for June 16, 2021at 5:30 pm. See https://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/1481/Shoreline-Master-Program-Periodic-Review. ▪ Planning Commission review: May-July 2021 ▪ Board of County Commissioners Review: Summer/Fall 2021 ▪ Prior to adoption, the County will also conduct review through the Washington State Department of Commerce through a 60-day notice of intent to adopt the master program amendments. 7) Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. See schedule of review in section A(6). May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 3 8) List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. SEPA Environmental Checklist and Addendum for Jefferson County’s Critical Areas Ordinance Update, prepared January 22, 2020 and issued January 29, 2020. Document is available at: https://www.co.jefferson.wa.us/1383/Critical-Areas-Ordinance or at https://apps.ecology.wa.gov/separ/Main/SEPA/Record.aspx?SEPANumber=202000589. The SEPA Checklist and Addendum are relevant since the County is incorporating its latest critical areas ordinance into the draft Shoreline Master Program similar to the current program approved in 2014. This document is hereby incorporated by reference pursuant to WAC 197-11-635. ESA Adolfson, in Association with Coast Geologic Services, Inc. and Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program Update Project, Ecology Grant #G0600343, Final Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report – Revised, November 2008. ESA Adolfson, Shoreline Master Program Update – Cumulative Impacts Analysis, February 2009. 9) Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. This is a nonproject proposal applicable countywide in shoreline jurisdiction. Future site-specific shoreline development proposals would be subject to SEPA as applicable. 10) List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. See A6). 11) Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Under RCW 90.58.080(4), Jefferson County has prepared draft Shoreline Master Program (SMP) amendments to keep the SMP current with changes in state law, changes in other County plans and regulations, and other changed local circumstances. The draft SMP proposes to incorporate critical areas regulations adopted in 2020. A summary of amendments appears in the table below. Exhibit 1. Summary of Draft Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Amendments May 2021 Section Summary of Proposed Key Changes General Format As amended through the periodic review, the codified version at Jefferson County Chapter 18.25 would replace the previously approved 2014 consolidated program version. The Official Shoreline Map (Appendix A) in Article XI retains the 2014 Appendix but will be republished. Appendix B JCC 18.22 critical areas ordinance as it existed in 2014 will be replaced with County Ordinance 05- 0310-20 that repealed and replaced the critical areas ordinance in 2020. Article I. Introduction Clarify SMP does not apply to lands under exclusive federal jurisdiction. Remove detail on critical areas regulations – refer to later section where incorporation by reference of critical areas is addressed. May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 4 Section Summary of Proposed Key Changes Article II. Definitions Update definitions for greater consistency with State law and rules, and to improve clarity and implementation. Article III. Master Program Goals Add in goals addressing climate change and adaptation, largely from the Comprehensive Plan. Support marine trades. Article IV. Shoreline Jurisdiction and Environment Designations Retain shoreline environment designations. Clarify west end rivers are aquatic below the ordinary high water mark. Amend Table 18.25.220 – Permitted, Conditional and Prohibited Uses consistent with other changes responding to state laws/periodic checklist (e.g. geoduck aquaculture, ocean uses) as well as regulatory reform and task force proposals (e.g. beach access, boat launches, mooring buoys). Article V. Shorelines of Statewide Significance Add management principles to assist in applying use preferences for shorelines of statewide significance. Article VI. General Policies and Regulations Amend policies to support protection of critical areas to assure no net loss of shoreline ecological function. Buffers are retained and language clarified for interpretation. Update the incorporation by reference to 2020 set of critical area ordinance. Define existing term of active use applied to buffer usage. Clarify modest home provision on new and existing single-family homes. Incorporate County interpretations regarding nonconforming septic repair and stormwater improvements, similar to critical area regulations. Clarify side yard widths are consistent with zoning. Allow for changes in height with a variance to respond to sea level rise. Clarify normal maintenance of vegetation. Clarify both new and existing development should retain vegetation. Article VII. Shoreline Modifications Policies and Regulations Beach access structures: Modify permit types for regulatory reform goals while retaining requirements and protections including prohibition waterward of the ordinary high water mark. Boat launch: Adjust permit types for regulatory reform goals while retaining requirements and protections. Add reference to state rules that apply to boat launches. Mooring buoys: Amend performance standards to require consistency with Corps of Engineers. Limit residences to two mooring buoys to stabilize a single boat to minimize damage. Clarify avoid and minimize effects to eelgrass patches as well as beds to improve implementation. Encourage Restoration: Reference state rules that allow for relief from SMP for restoration in urban growth areas. Shoreline Stabilization: Clarify requirements for geotechnical analysis for shoreline stabilization and match state rules. Match state rules on soft shoreline stabilization approaches. May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 5 Section Summary of Proposed Key Changes Article VIII. Use-Specific Policies and Regulations Agriculture: Add in policies addressing climate change and adaptation, largely from the Comprehensive Plan. Cross-reference agriculture/critical area regulations. Aquaculture: Match 2011 state shoreline rules regarding (new) geoduck aquaculture. Relocate finfish aquaculture maps to Article XI. Reduce redundancy and improve consistency with state rules on review criteria and permit requirement for geoduck conditional use permits. Commercial use: Clarify that maritime education and public uses should follow commercial standards. Forst practice: Match state law on forest practice requirements. Transportation: Incorporate Comprehensive Plan policies on sea level rise and adapting/mitigating transportation facilities. Article IX. Permit Criteria and Exemptions Update exemptions to match state rules (e.g. fair market value, add ADA retrofit, cross reference state requirements). Article X. Administration and Enforcement Clarify permit type and review procedures. Add required changes per state laws and rules on development not required to obtain shoreline permits (e.g. WSDOT facility maintenance) or that have special review requirements. Non-conforming single family home expansions one-time enlargement: Minor expansions, non-waterward: Allow for lateral expansion subject to the square footage limitations subject to a Type II permit that includes notice. Add a more specific planting plan intended to provide no-net-loss through equivalent enhancement of the shoreline buffer. Also add a monitoring plan to help respond to tribal and agency input. Minor expansions, waterward: Retain provision to allow filling in a notch in existing structure foundation wall. Allow for no more than 200 square feet enclosure of existing porch on existing legally installed impervious area, if landward of the common line setback, and if providing a planting plan and revegetating the area with 80% native plantings; similar to modest home provision but for small expansions (e.g. expand kitchen in only place possible). Moderate expansions: Retain provisions allowing lateral, vertical, or landward expansion, with discretionary permit; add details and standards for a planting plan and add monitoring and retention of enhanced vegetation. Recognize existing residential development with no change as conforming per 2011 state rules. Add state rules on transmittal of permits to Ecology. Clarify SMP amendment process per state rules. Article XI. Shoreline Mapping Relocate finfish maps to this section. Per state requirements, added a list of waterbodies subject to SMP based on the Inventory and Characterization Report. Article XII. Ocean Management The Ocean Resources Management Act (ORMA; RCW 43.143) and WAC 173- 26-360 have long been in effect; the current SMP’s ORMA cross reference provision was adequate for 2014 approval. Since then the Washington Marine May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 6 Section Summary of Proposed Key Changes Spatial Plan (MSP) was adopted in 2018, and the SMP now needs adequate provisions to fully implement ORMA & the MSP as required by state law and rules. 12) Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposal applies to lands within shoreline jurisdiction in all unincorporated areas of Jefferson County. This generally includes all marine waters, lakes greater than 20 acres in size, streams where the mean annual flow is 20 cubic feet per second, associated wetlands, and uplands within 200 feet. B. Environmental Elements [HELP] 1. EARTH [HELP] a. General description of the site: (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _____________ Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long- term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 7 The proposed SMP addresses geotechnical report standards for shoreline stabilization, and emphasizes soft approaches. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Response: Each new project must comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including SEPA and its implementing regulations, and Chapter 18.40, Article X JCC (SEPA Implementation). Chapter 18.25 JCC (Shoreline Master Program, and proposed amendments) or Chapter 18.22 JCC (Critical Areas Ordinance), will provide substantive development standards that control siting and mitigate impacts. In addition Chapter 18.15 (Land Use Districts), 18.20 (Performance and Use-Specific Standards) and Chapter 18.30 JCC (Development Standards) contain development and performance standards that control siting and mitigate impacts. 2. AIR [HELP] a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of off-site sources will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 8 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Response: Olympic Region Clean Air Agency (ORCAA) provides rules addressing activities inside and outside of shoreline jurisdiction meant to provide consistency with state air quality standards. The agency addresses asbestos, burning, and air operating permits. Each new project must comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including SEPA and its implementing regulations, and Chapter 18.40, Article X JCC (SEPA Implementation). Chapter 18.25 JCC (Shoreline Master Program, and proposed amendments) or Chapter 18.22 JCC (Critical Areas Ordinance), will provide substantive development standards that control siting and mitigate impacts. In addition Chapter 18.15 (Land Use Districts), 18.20 (Performance and Use-Specific Standards) and Chapter 18.30 JCC (Development Standards) contain development and performance standards that control siting and mitigate impacts. 3. WATER [HELP] a. Surface Water: [help] 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). Shoreline jurisdiction includes lands within 200 feet of the shorelines of the state, approximately. A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. The SMP provides goals and regulations meant to allow for appropriate shoreline uses and modifications provided there is no net loss of shoreline ecological function. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 9 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. b. Ground Water: [help] 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 10 description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: Response: Each new project must comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including SEPA and its implementing regulations, and Chapter 18.40, Article X JCC (SEPA Implementation). Chapter 18.25 JCC (Shoreline Master Program, and proposed amendments) or Chapter 18.22 JCC (Critical Areas Ordinance), will provide substantive development standards that control siting and mitigate impacts. The proposed SMP retains 18.25.320 Water quality and quantity; this section prohibits discharging solid wastes, liquid wastes and untreated effluents to any groundwater or surface water or to be discharged onto land. Other SMP amendment proposals allow for nonconforming septic repair consistent with County health codes and code interpretations. In addition Chapter 18.15 (Land Use Districts), 18.20 (Performance and Use-Specific Standards) and Chapter 18.30 JCC (Development Standards) contain development and performance standards that control siting and mitigate impacts. JCC 18.22.130 provides protection standards for groundwater in susceptible aquifer recharge and special aquifer protection areas. JCC 18.30.060(1)(a) requires all grading and clearing activities to be conducted so as to minimize potential adverse effects of these activities on forested lands, surface water quality and quantity, groundwater recharge, and fish and wildlife habitat, adjacent properties, and downstream drainage channels. All future project applications must be evaluated independently under JCC 18.30.070 that requires compliance with the Department of Ecology’s Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. 4. PLANTS [HELP] a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: ____deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ____evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ____shrubs ____grass ____pasture ____crop or grain ____Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. ____wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ____water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ____other types of vegetation Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. Any vegetation that will be removed or altered at a site will be discussed in a future project -level May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 11 SEPA checklist. Further, critical areas regulations require vegetation retention for any fish and wildlife habitat conservation area for geologically hazardous areas. JCC 18.25.270(3)(h) requires vegetation maintenance in shoreline buffers. JCC 18.25.310 contains vegetation conservation regulations for shorelines. The SMP amendments propose to emphasize no net loss of critical area functions and values in shoreline jurisdiction. Minor adjustments to vegetation maintenance are proposed to improve implementation. The SMP would also improve planting plan requirements for nonconforming single family expansions including adding monitoring. c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. The proposed SMP would incorporate by reference 2020 critical areas ordinance regulations which provides protection standards for fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas. Further, known threatened or endangered species on a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. Any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Response: Any proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. See 4.b regarding critical area and shoreline standards regarding retaining and enhancing vegetation. JCC 18.30.130 regulates landscaping and screening at the project level. Landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. Each new project must comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including SEPA and its implementing regulations, and Chapter 18.40, Article X JCC (SEPA Implementation). Chapter 18.25 JCC (Shoreline Master Program, and proposed amendments) or Chapter 18.22 JCC (Critical Areas Ordinance), will provide substantive development standards that control siting and mitigate impacts. In addition Chapter 18.15 (Land Use Districts), 18.20 (Performance and Use-Specific Standards) and Chapter 18.30 JCC (Development Standards) contain development and performance standards that control siting and mitigate impacts. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 12 5. ANIMALS [HELP] a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ________ Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). Birds and other animals which have been observed on or near a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). Threatened and endangered species known to be on or near a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). Migration routes on a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Response: The SMP retains shoreline buffers and no-net-loss provisions for shoreline ecological conditions. It incorporates by reference the County’s recent 2020 critical areas regulations developed based on best available science. Article III of the SMP is proposed to be amended to add policies to address conservation and climate resilience consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Mooring buoys would be limited in association with residences to allow two to stabilize boats to avoid habitat impacts. This is consistent with the policy preference for buoys over other boating facilities noted in the 2009 Cumulative Impacts Analysis. Eelgrass patches as well as beds would be protected and must be avoided to the extent feasible. While mooring buoys permit types may change to address regulatory reform, performance standards including standards for no net loss of ecological function remain. Article XII is added regarding Ocean Management including addressing protections of the ORMA and MSP. The proposed SMP would incorporate by reference 2020 critical areas ordinance regulations which provides protection standards for fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas. See also 4.b regarding critical area and shoreline standards regarding retaining and enhancing vegetation. Each new project must comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including SEPA and its implementing regulations, and Chapter 18.40, Article X JCC (SEPA Implementation). Chapter 18.25 May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 13 JCC (Shoreline Master Program, and proposed amendments) or Chapter 18.22 JCC (Critical Areas Ordinance), will provide substantive development standards that control siting and mitigate impacts. In addition Chapter 18.15 (Land Use Districts), 18.20 (Performance and Use-Specific Standards) and Chapter 18.30 JCC (Development Standards) contain development and performance standards that control siting and mitigate impacts. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES [HELP] a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). The County applies the State Energy Code at JCC 15.05.030. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH [HELP] a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 14 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). There are no environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal. Environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste on a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). Existing hazardous chemicals/conditions on a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). The proposal does not require special emergency services. Special emergency services that might be required on a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Response: Each new project must comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including SEPA and its implementing regulations, and Chapter 18.40, Article X JCC (SEPA Implementation). Chapter 18.25 JCC (Shoreline Master Program, and proposed amendments) or Chapter 18.22 JCC (Critical Areas Ordinance), will provide substantive development standards that control siting and mitigate impacts. In addition Chapter 18.15 (Land Use Districts), 18.20 (Performance and Use-Specific Standards) and Chapter 18.30 JCC (Development Standards) contain development and performance standards that control siting and mitigate impacts. State and federal laws regarding hazardous materials and clean up also apply. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 15 description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Response: See 7.a.5) for programmatic environmental and land use mitigation. In addition, JCC 18.30.190 incorporates noise mitigation requirements in the State Environmental Policy Act, Chapter 43.21C RCW, related to noise abatement, and provides that noise shall not exceed the requirements in Chapter 8.70 JCC (Noise Control) and Chapter 173-60 WAC, as they exist now or may be amended in the future. Chapter 173-60 WAC implements Chapter 70.107 RCW (Noise Control Act of 1974). 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE [HELP] a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. The SMP provides goals and regulations regarding agricultural uses consistent with the Shoreline Management Act; a cross reference to critical areas regulations and associated stewardship provisions is also included. 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. c. Describe any structures on the site. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. The SMP addresses both new and existing structures in shoreline jurisdiction. Standards would be amended regarding minor and modest non-conforming single family home expansions, allowed just one time, provided there is associated vegetation enhancements and monitoring. The SMP proposal limits the size of minor waterward expansions to allow for enclosures of existing legal impervious May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 16 areas (e.g. porches), subject to extensive vegetation enhancement and monitoring. Current standards for minor and moderate non-waterward expansions would also be modified to have more specific planting plan and monitoring standards. Similar to the 2009 Cumulative Impacts Analysis evaluation, one-time minor expansions are limited if they do not increase the degree of non-conformity. To limit impacts caused by larger expansions, the SMP requires that property owners enhance the shoreline buffer through planting to offset the increased structure size such that the area of enhancement is proportionate to the size of the expansion. The proposed SMP amendments would further provide for shoreline ecological protection by specifying planting plan requirements and monitoring. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. Any development would need to meet SMP and critical areas regulations buffers as well as zoning standards. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. No shoreline environment designations would be modified with the draft SMP amendments. Text clarifications would identify that west end rivers below the ordinary high water mark are considered aquatic, which improves clarity of the SMP. h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. The draft SMP will apply 2020 critical area regulations to critical areas that relate to future development sites in the shoreline. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 17 legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. l. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. Any future development would be required to meet SMP standards for shoreline compatible uses and underlying zoning standards. The standards addressing compatibility include landscaping, setbacks, and height, among others. m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: Response: See 8(b). 9. HOUSING [HELP] a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Response: Housing types are primarily directed by zoning standards. Any future development in shoreline jurisdiction would be required to meet SMP standards for shoreline compatible uses; single family residential is considered a preferred use. May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 18 10. AESTHETICS [HELP] a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Response: In shoreline jurisdiction the tallest allowed height is 35 feet. The proposed SMP amendments would allow a variance process if greater height were required to address sea level rise; corresponding changes in the zoning code to allow variance process would also be made. SMP standards regarding avoiding changes to views for substantial numbers of people are retained. The variance process will allow for appropriate notice and review. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Response: See 10.a. There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Response: See 10.a regarding review criteria regarding view protection. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). Measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE [HELP] a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). The type of light or glare a proposal produces will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). The type of light or glare from off-site sources will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). The type of light or glare off-site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Response: Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. The current and proposed SMP includes standards to protect shoreline views for substantial numbers of people. There are light and glare standards for some forms of aquaculture in the SMP. In addition there are use-specific light and glare standards in Chapter 18.20 Performance and Use-Specific Standards and 18.30 Development Standards. May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 19 12. RECREATION [HELP] a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. The proposed SMP would adjust boat launch provisions to allow for a more streamlined process for non-residential boat launches in some shoreline areas; however, all boat launches residential and non- residential would be subject to state design and construction standards. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). Site specific effects on recreation will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Response: The SMP retains public access standards applicable to future development of more than 4 dwellings. The SMP allows for boat launch facilities with appropriate environmental protection standards and other water enjoyment uses. The Jefferson County Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Plan guides parks and recreation investments in the county. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION [HELP] a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so, specifically describe. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). Data sources will be identified with site-specific development. May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 20 d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. Response: The SMP contains JCC 18.25.280 Historic, archaeological, cultural, scientific and educational resources that protect historic and archaeological resources. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources on or near a project site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. 14. TRANSPORTATION [HELP] a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). Transportation access on or near a project site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. The SMP continues to regulate new or expanded transportation facilities. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). Transit services will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). Parking location is regulated in the SMP with a preference for a location away from the water’s edge. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). Demand for transportation improvements will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. The SMP does promote public access to the shoreline such as trails. e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). Transportation services will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 21 trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). Traffic trips will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). The relationship of a proposed development in rural and resource lands can be addressed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). Any measures to reduce or control transportation impacts will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. This would include consistency with standards in the SMP that limit or condition new or expanded roads or parking areas in shoreline jurisdiction. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES [HELP] a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). The legislation does not increase the capacity for growth, but rather regulates it in the shoreline jurisdiction. The proposed SMP includes clarifications that public uses can follow commercial standards which provides improved implementation of the SMP for uses such as schools. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). Any measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services for a project will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. 16. UTILITIES [HELP] a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other ___________ Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 22 b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Response: There is no “project” or “site” for this proposal. This proposal is a non-project proposal for legislation that updates the Jefferson County SMP, as described in response to Question A (11). A description of a site will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. Utilities are regulated in the SMP. The draft SMP incorporates interpretations regarding nonconforming septic facilities. It also addresses stormwater facilities in the buffer if it is not feasible to be located outside the buffer and meets strict standards for evaluation, avoiding critical areas ad includes appropriate mitigation measures; this is similar to the critical areas ordinance. C. Signature [HELP] The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: ______________________________________________ Name of signee __Lisa Grueter _________________________________ Position and Agency/Organization ______ Principal, BERK Consulting, Inc. Date Submitted: ___May 14, 2021____ May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 23 D. Supplemental sheet for nonproject actions [HELP] (IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1) How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Response: The SMP proposal incorporates new critical areas regulations into shoreline jurisdiction including the critical aquifer recharge regulations designed to avoid contamination of aquifers. Other SMP amendment proposals allow for nonconforming septic repair consistent with County health codes and code interpretations. The proposed SMP retains 18.25.320 Water quality and quantity; this section prohibits discharging solid wastes, liquid wastes and untreated effluents to any groundwater or surface water or to be discharged onto land. The proposed SMP changes would not alter air quality protections in state or regional rules. The state and county noise standards would continue to apply. Federal, state and local regulations regarding hazardous materials would be maintained. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Response: Each new project must comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including SEPA and its implementing regulations, and Chapter 18.40, Article X JCC (SEPA Implementation). Chapter 18.25 JCC (Shoreline Master Program, and proposed amendments) or Chapter 18.22 JCC (Critical Areas Ordinance), will provide substantive development standards that control siting and mitigate impacts. In addition Chapter 18.15 (Land Use Districts), 18.20 (Performance and Use-Specific Standards) and Chapter 18.30 JCC (Development Standards) contain development and performance standards that control siting and mitigate impacts. JCC 18.30.060(1)(a) requires all grading and clearing activities to be conducted so as to minimize potential adverse effects of these activities on forested lands, surface water quality and quantity, groundwater recharge, and fish and wildlife habitat, adjacent properties, and downstream drainage channels. All future project applications must be evaluated independently under JCC 18.30.070 that requires compliance with the Department of Ecology’s Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington. State and federal laws regarding hazardous materials and clean up also apply. 2) How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Response: The proposed SMP would incorporate by reference 2020 critical areas ordinance regulations which provides protection standards for fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas. The SMP amendments propose to emphasize no net loss of critical area functions and values in shoreline jurisdiction. Minor adjustments to vegetation maintenance are proposed to improve implementation. The SMP would also improve planting plan requirements for nonconforming single family expansions May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 24 including adding monitoring. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Response: Critical areas regulations require vegetation retention for any fish and wildlife habitat conservation area for geologically hazardous areas. JCC 18.25.270(3)(h) requires vegetation maintenance in shoreline buffers. JCC 18.25.310 contains vegetation conservation regulations for shorelines. JCC 18.30.130 regulates landscaping and screening at the project level. 3) How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Response: The proposal would not allow development that would deplete energy or natural resources. Agriculture and forestry are allowed uses in shorelines consistent with state definitions and subject to critical areas regulations focusing on environmental stewardship. The SMP continues to allow for careful siting of energy infrastructure depending on the character of shoreline environments and state authorities. New Article XII with Ocean Uses are a match to state laws. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Response: The SMP regulates utility and energy uses. The County applies the State Energy Code at JCC 15.05.030. 4) How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Response: The SMP amendments propose to emphasize no net loss of critical area functions and values in shoreline jurisdiction. Minor adjustments to vegetation maintenance are proposed to improve implementation. The SMP would also improve planting plan requirements for nonconforming single family expansions including adding monitoring. The SMP retains shoreline buffers and no-net-loss provisions for shoreline ecological conditions. It incorporates by reference the County’s recent 2020 critical areas regulations developed based on best available science. Article III of the SMP is proposed to be amended to add policies to address conservation and climate resilience consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed SMP addresses geotechnical report standards for shoreline stabilization, and emphasizes soft approaches. Mooring buoys would be limited in association with residences to allow two to stabilize boats to avoid habitat impacts. This is consistent with the policy preference for buoys over other boating facilities noted in the 2009 Cumulative Impacts Analysis. Kelp patches as well as beds would be protected and must be avoided to the extent feasible. While mooring buoys permit typologies may change to address regulatory reform, performance standards including standards for no net loss of ecological function remain. Article XII is added regarding Ocean Management including addressing protections of the ORMA and MSP. The proposed SMP would incorporate by reference 2020 critical areas ordinance regulations which provides protection standards for fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas. May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 25 Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Response: Critical areas regulations require vegetation retention for any fish and wildlife habitat conservation area for geologically hazardous areas. JCC 18.25.270(3)(h) requires vegetation maintenance in shoreline buffers. JCC 18.25.310 contains vegetation conservation regulations for shorelines. 5) How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Response: No shoreline environment designations would be modified with the draft SMP amendments. Text clarifications would identify that west end rivers below the ordinary high water mark are considered aquatic, which improves clarity of the SMP. The SMP addresses both new and existing structures in shoreline jurisdiction. Standards would be amended regarding minor and modest non-conforming single family home expansions, allowed just one time, provided there is associated vegetation enhancements and monitoring. The SMP proposal limits the size of minor waterward expansions to allow for enclosures of existing legal impervious areas (e.g. porches), subject to extensive vegetation enhancement and monitoring. Current standards for minor and moderate non-waterward expansions would also be modified to have more specific planting plan and monitoring standards. Similar to the 2009 Cumulative Impacts Analysis that one-time minor expansion are limited if they do not increase the degree of non-conformity. To limit impacts caused by larger expansions, the SMP requires that property owners enhance the shoreline buffer through planting to offset the increased structure size such that the area of enhancement is proportionate to the size of the expansion. The proposed SMP amendments would further provide for shoreline ecological protection by specifying planting plan requirements and monitoring. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: Response: Any future development would be required to meet SMP standards for shoreline compatible uses and underlying zoning standards. These standards addressing compatibility include landscaping, setbacks, and height, among others. 6) How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Response: The SMP amendments do not increase the capacity for growth in the shoreline jurisdiction. There are no upland shoreline environment designation changes. The SMP includes policies and regulations addressing proper location and design of transportation and utilities limiting them in the most sensitive areas and preferring locations moved away from the shoreline. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Response: Any measures to reduce or control transportation impacts will be discussed in a future project-level SEPA checklist. This could include consistency with standards in the SMP that limit or condition new or expanded roads or parking areas in shoreline jurisdiction. May 14, 2021 Jefferson County | Shoreline Master Program Periodic Review SEPA Environmental Checklist 26 7) Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Response: The Jefferson County SMP Periodic Review amendments are based on an evaluation of state laws and rules using the Washington Department of Ecology’s Periodic Review Checklist. The proposed SMP amendments are meant to increase consistency with state laws and reflect local circumstances, while retaining no-net-loss of shoreline ecological function. No adverse environmental impacts requiring mitigation above and beyond existing or amended code provisions has been identified. At the time of a site-specific development proposal within shoreline jurisdiction, mitigation may be necessary and may be imposed.