HomeMy WebLinkAboutBLD2020-00573-11- CONSISTENCY REVIEW CHECKLISTUp Front Parcel
Review Parcel
Date Completed:
Owner Name:
Add. Name:
Mailing Address:
Site Address(es):
Parcel Number: S-T-R: --Total Acreage
Legal Description Land Use:
Flood District:Fire District:Planning Area:
Flood Map (FIRM) Panel No: School District Zoning:
[ ] Zoning ________________________________________________________________________________
[ ]Setbacks:Front:_______Left Side:__________Right Side: __________ Rear:_______________
Informed by JCC 18.30 or Title 17 for Master Planned Resorts:
Shoreline Setback:____________Critical Area Buffer__________________________________________
Building Setback: ______________________________________________________________________
Adjoining Forest Lands: Commercial/ ____________ Rural/______________Inholding_______________
[ ] Lots/Require Declaration of Restrictive Covenant YES NO, submitted: YES NO __________________
[ ] Legal Access to Property YES NO _____________________________________________________
[ ] Parcel Tags or Scanned Documents YES NO List:_________________________________________
[ ] Sepcial Reports Nearby YES NO List:____________________________________________________
[ ] Shoreline Designation: YES NO _______________________________________________________
[ ] Critical Areas
Geologically Hazardous Areas YES NO
Shoreline Slope Stability:____________Landslide____________Erosion_____Seismic___________
CMZ: none High Risk Moderate Risk Disconnected CMZ__________________________
Report Submitted________________________________________________________________________
FWHCA: YES NO Stream type: __________________________ Pond or Lake < 20 acres________
Marbled murrelet/Spotted owl_____________ marine nearshore______________
Wetlands:YES NO ___________________________________________________________________
Flood:YES NO List FIRM map:_______________________________________________________
Flood Certificate: ______________________________________________________
Aquifer Recharge Area:YES NO___________________________________________________________
SIPZ: none At Risk High Risk Coastal ________________________________________[
] Site Visit conducted YES NO _____________________________________________________
[ ]Notice Provisions/Disclosure Forest Lands:YES NO Airport YES NO MRL YES NO
Agricultural Lands: YES NO No Shooting Zone:YES NO
[ ] Archaeology:YES NO _____________________________________________________________
990603112, BLD20-00573
01/15/2021
Ferguson & Cole Inc.
26221 NW Pioneer Way
Poulsbo, WA 98370-3637
90 PIONEER DR
PORT LUDLOW, WA 98365
990603112, BLD20-00573 9-28N-1E 0.34 Acres
PORT LUDLOW NO. 2 AREA 3 LOT 112 7
N/A 3 9100
N/A 49 MPR-SF-4
4 MPR-SF-4
4
4
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
N/A N/A N/A
No No
4 Yes PIONEER DR
4 No
4 No
4 No None
4
4
No
None None No No
None
No
No
none N/A
N/A
No
None
No
4 No No No
No Yes
4 No No archaeological hits observed- A.H, 1/8/2021
Land Use Requirements
[ ] SEPA Required:YES EXEMPT _________________________________________________
[ ] Landscaping Required: Yes No_______________________________________________________
[ ] Parking Spaces Required NO 2 Other_______________________________________________
[ ] Building Height: 35' UBC Standard __________________________________________________
[ ]Stormwater: New Impervious Surface_____________Land Disturbing Activity ________________
Min Req #1 thru #5Stormwater Req's: Min Req #2 Min Req #1 thru #9
Engineering ________________ Drainage District Review Required___________
[ ] Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Submitted: Yes No __________________________________
[ ] Impervious Surface coverage percentage: __________________________________________
Resource Lands & Public: 10%Rural Residential: 25%Rural Industrial: Per UDC Sec 6.7
Rural Commercial: 60%Area of Building Coverage: 60% in Rural Industrial Lands only
[ ] ADMIN: Setbacks entered in Permit Plan case N/A YES ________________________________
New Parcel Tags entered in Permit Plan N/A YES ____________________________________
Special Reports Scanned N/A YES _________________________________________________
[ ] ADU Proposed YES NO Square Footage: ______________________
[ ] Total Building (s) Size:____________________________________________________________
RVC: 20,000 SF CC: 5,000 SF NC: 7,500 SF GC: 10,000 SF All others: subject to septic & water constraints/None specified
[ ] Road Classification:_______________________________________________________________
Road Approach:EXISTING NOT REQ'D RAP__________________________________________
[ ] Require Final Zoning Approval/inspection YES NO __________________________________________
[ ] UGA No Protest Agreement YES NO, submitted: YES NO _____________
[ ] Recorded Date of Subdivision:_______________AFN____________________________Over 5yrs=UDC
Plat Conditions:_____________________________________<5yrs=Plat Conditions on plat or Old Ordinance
Reviewed By:
Additional Notes:
4,171 sq/ft
4
4
No
Yes
Yes
4 Medium Stormwater Project (WK A, B, C)
28%, MPR- 45%
10,636 sq/ft
4
4 N/A
N/A
N/A
4 Exempt
4 No
4 2
4
4 No
4
4
4
County-540009
RAP REQ'D RAP20-00068- Approved
No
4 No No N/A
N/A4
N/A
N/A
Amanda Hunt
There are no Critical Areas located on this property.
The proposed NSFR w/ attached garage is located in a NO SHOOTING AREA.
Port Ludlow Drainage District Letter required.
Approximate Property Slope: 11.25 %
Run: 160ft
Rise: 350-332= 18
18/160= 0.1125
0.1125 x 100 = 11.25
Neighbor Comments: Stormwater Drainage
1. "As we are much lower we also have concerns with storm water drainage. There is a
drain line that runs across that lot that ends at a ditch on fleet drive. We currently have no
drainage issues. This line may be damaged during construction. Is there a storm water
drainage plan we can review".
2. . "Actually, my inquiry was not about a potential drain. It concerned the existing french
drain that runs along the lower (downslope) edge of the property and discharges
stormwater into the drainage ditch along Fleet. That existing drain appears to be
functioning adequately for now as we have seen no flooding in our upper back yard. Our
concern is for potential damage to that drain from heavy machinery traffic, stump removal,
etc. We had expected that the County could document what is there and provide
assurances within the proposed building permit that the existing drainage functions will be
maintained during and after construction".