HomeMy WebLinkAbout072David W. Johnson
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
vmorriscs@aol.com
Thursday, December 03, 2009 7:39 PM
David W. Johnson
peckassoc@comcast. net
Fwd: Response to Scoping Comments
Fwd: Part Two of Scoping Comments
During our conference call on the 9th, let's discuss the Scoping comments received, whether the County plans to prepare
a response to these, or whether the comments willjust be used as input to confirming the scope of the EIS and technical
reports (consistent with the intent of WAC 197-1 1-408[4]). I have copied into this message below Garth's instruction to
one of the technical team members. ln a telephone conversation with Garth today, I told him that I had not yet talked with
you to confirm the County's preference for how/whether there will be a direct response to Scoping comments received,
and that I would like to send a consistent message about this to all technical team members before any action is
taken (since Garth had his Administrative Assistant distribute the full set of Scoping comments to them).
Vicki
--- Forwarded Message ---
From : "Garth Man n" <Garth M@statesmancorporation.com>
To: "Scott Bender" <scott@benderllc.com>, peckassoc@comcast.net
Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2009 6:55:52 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: RE: Part Two of Scoping Comments
No need to address them all.
Simple place them in a spread sheet and address the responses generally . Start with an opening statement.
"From the letters received from the October 2009 scoping meeting, the following responses are summarized in
an easy to understand format. I have used this structure since most of the enquiries were similar or exactly the
same content, and this chart identifies the enquiry with the appropriate response."
1
M. Garth Mann
President & C.E.O
P:403-256-4151
M:403-899-9222
F: 403-256-6100
7370 Sierra Morena Blvd. S.W.
Calgary, Alberta
T3H 4H9