HomeMy WebLinkAbout006 This message's attachments have been archived by the Barracuda Message Archiver.
CraigPeckResponseToComments-Jan19-10.pdf <http://10.10.14.201:8000/cgi-mod/getstubbedattachment.cgi/CraigPeckResponseToComments-Jan19-10.pdf?mid=f58cb06d3c87e6832c42cda80ccd27e553f7539d08f2bb4a56e7
08854d6f2683b37c4927&charset=us-ascii&len=150179&md5=2a2196c164e3893faeb4e11c50e54912> (146.7K)
GeoEngineersResponseToComments-Jan19-10.pdf <http://10.10.14.201:8000/cgi-mod/getstubbedattachment.cgi/GeoEngineersResponseToComments-Jan19-10.pdf?mid=f58cb06d3c87e6832c42cda80ccd27e553f7539d08f2bb
4a56e708854d6f2683b37c4927&charset=us-ascii&len=1366288&md5=2d9616e4fae7d9cf6875bc24b4bce599> (1.3M)
H.R.EsveltResponseToComments-Jan4-10.pdf <http://10.10.14.201:8000/cgi-mod/getstubbedattachment.cgi/H.R.EsveltResponseToComments-Jan4-10.pdf?mid=f58cb06d3c87e6832c42cda80ccd27e553f7539d08f2bb4a56e7
08854d6f2683b37c4927&charset=us-ascii&len=38580&md5=d1336a89d0892a06e4e84bb0208f6800> (37.7K)
MikeReadResponseToScopingComments-1-Jan12-10.pdf <http://10.10.14.201:8000/cgi-mod/getstubbedattachment.cgi/MikeReadResponseToScopingComments-1-Jan12-10.pdf?mid=f58cb06d3c87e6832c42cda80ccd27e553f7
539d08f2bb4a56e708854d6f2683b37c4927&charset=us-ascii&len=24540&md5=2d1a63079d7eec751154d1c9db32058a> (24.0K)
MikeReadResponseToScopingComments-2-Jan12-10.pdf <http://10.10.14.201:8000/cgi-mod/getstubbedattachment.cgi/MikeReadResponseToScopingComments-2-Jan12-10.pdf?mid=f58cb06d3c87e6832c42cda80ccd27e553f7
539d08f2bb4a56e708854d6f2683b37c4927&charset=us-ascii&len=67274&md5=6391d326a1fc86beb75109031e8b7997> (65.7K)
ScottBenderResponseToScopingComments-1-Jan14-2010.pdf <http://10.10.14.201:8000/cgi-mod/getstubbedattachment.cgi/ScottBenderResponseToScopingComments-1-Jan14-2010.pdf?mid=f58cb06d3c87e6832c42cda80c
cd27e553f7539d08f2bb4a56e708854d6f2683b37c4927&charset=us-ascii&len=46035&md5=e46b74017fe0762b2757ba3586ac0966> (45.0K)
ScottBenderResponseToScopingComments-2-Jan14-10.pdf <http://10.10.14.201:8000/cgi-mod/getstubbedattachment.cgi/ScottBenderResponseToScopingComments-2-Jan14-10.pdf?mid=f58cb06d3c87e6832c42cda80ccd27
e553f7539d08f2bb4a56e708854d6f2683b37c4927&charset=us-ascii&len=43961&md5=a411aa488fbf0323ad56c4f4d0e64109> (42.9K)
ScottBenderResponseToStaff&PeerReviewComments-Jan14-2010.pdf <http://10.10.14.201:8000/cgi-mod/getstubbedattachment.cgi/ScottBenderResponseToStaff%26PeerReviewComments-Jan14-2010.pdf?mid=f58cb06d3c
87e6832c42cda80ccd27e553f7539d08f2bb4a56e708854d6f2683b37c4927&charset=us-ascii&len=177617&md5=133611a193aa7b7777c446932f1217a4> (173.5K)
VinniePerroneResponseToComments-Jan14-10.pdf <http://10.10.14.201:8000/cgi-mod/getstubbedattachment.cgi/VinniePerroneResponseToComments-Jan14-10.pdf?mid=f58cb06d3c87e6832c42cda80ccd27e553f7539d08f2
bb4a56e708854d6f2683b37c4927&charset=us-ascii&len=3717119&md5=936c1d064b0a69300a7712d3718bf821> (3.5M)
FYI – Tech Team Response to County comments.
From: vmorriscs@aol.com [mailto:vmorriscs@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 9:21 AM
To: David W. Johnson
Cc: peckassoc@comcast.net; Garth@statesmancorporation.com; AMackie@perkinscoie.com
Subject: Pleasant Harbor Technical Team Response to Comments
David:
On January 3 and 4, I distributed to members of the Pleasant Harbor Marina and Golf Resort technical team pdf files of Scoping comments received in November 2009, and pdf files of County
staff and Peer Review Team comments prepared between July and September 2009. I asked the team to review these comments to determine which need to be addressed in their final reports,
and which may not (with an explanation for the latter). As of today, I have received replies from all members of the technical team except the Cultural Resources consultant. I am still
working with the Forestry consultant on their responses; I will send these to you as soon as they're available. I have attached all other replies for your review in advance of when
you, Stacie, Craig and I will meet to confirm the consolidated list of requests for report revisions.
If you plan to prepare a Final Scoping Memorandum to confirm issues to be addressed in the technical reports and SEIS, you could begin drafting that now with this input. I would like
to review and contribute to the Scoping memo after we meet.
In addition to responding to Scoping comments, County staff and Peer Review Team comments in their reports, technical team members will need the following items to be added to the consolidated
list of requirements to be addressed in their final reports:
1. Uniform introductory text (Craig, you and I to rework from draft provided by Garth).
2. Narrative description and illustration of the three alternatives to be evaluated in the SEIS.
3. My requests re: the format/content of the Potential Impacts sections (to address impacts during construction and in the developed condition of the project, distinctions between
alternatives, and significant unavoidable adverse impacts [if any]).
4. My requests re: the format/content of the Mitigation Measures sections (to address Incorporated Features, Applicable Regulations, and Other Recommended Mitigation Measures).
Craig is working on the site plans for the alternatives now. When these are available, he and I will meet to develop draft narrative descriptions, after which we will schedule our meeting
with you and Stacie.
Let me know if there is anything else you need at this time, and/or if you see this sequence proceeding differently.
Vicki
Vicki Morris Consulting Services
7732 18th Avenue NE
Seattle, WA 98115-4426
206.522.8057
Cellular: 206.501.8227
FAX: 206.523.4648