HomeMy WebLinkAbout016Michelle Farfan
From: David W. Johnson <dwjohnson@co.jefferson.wa.us>
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 7:55 AM
To: VMorrisCS@aol.com
Cc: Al Scalf; Stacie Hoskins; Jim Pearson; peckassoc@comcast.net
Subject: FW: Brinnon Master Planned Resort; Development Agreement and MOA
Attachments: SEIS Scoping Comments.doc
FYI — The DA would provide for an MOA with Public Works prior to site development, but would not require one as a
condition to DA approval as is the case with other MOUS and therefore not be part of the SEIS Fiscal Analysis element.
From: Jim Pearson
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 12:11 PM
To: 'Craig Peck'
Cc: David W. Johnson
Subject: Brinnon Master Planned Resort; Development Agreement and MOA
Craig,
I appreciated the opportunity to meet with you and David Johnson to discuss the Brinnon resort project. This email is
intended to confirm our discussion and clarify the Public Works Department's comments dated November 30, 2009
related to the Supplemental EIS and Development Agreement between Jefferson County and Statesman.
Development Agreement and Memorandum of Agreement
The Development Agreement should require Statesman to enter into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the
Jefferson County Public Works Department regarding procedures, standards, and specifications for plan review,
construction, and project phasing. The Development Agreement should specify that Statesman will reimburse the
Department for its expenses related to the project.
The MOA would include provisions regarding:
• Development standards (e.g. ASSHTO, WSDOT, Ecology SWM Manual),
• Construction supervision and certification by the project engineer,
• Procedures for plan review and construction inspections,
• Contacts, including the project engineer, on-site inspectors, testing company, and Certified Erosion and Sediment
Control Lead,
• Pre -construction meetings for project phases and off-site improvements,
• Weekly reports by the project engineer documenting the activities that were conducted and that are anticipated for
the following week,
• Procedures and specifications for materials sampling and testing and providing reports to Public Works,
• Traffic control,
• Const5ruction of improvements to Black Point Road, and
• Project and roadway improvement phasing.
Statesman would prepare a draft MOA for review by Public Works. The MOA would be concluded prior to initial site
development.
Project and Mitigation Phasing
The initial development phase of the project will include the relocated Marina residential and retail development, golf
course development, staff housing and golf course maintenance facility, and the main resort building. Highway 101 / Black
Point Road intersection improvements, including the secondary site access, Transit facility, pedestrian crossing, and
access to the marina and WDFW property will be constructed during the initial phase.
Statesman proposes to use the secondary site access to serve the initial development phase. Improvements to the
segment of Black Point Road that extends beyond the secondary site access to the main site access at +/-Mile Post 0.7
would be conducted in conjunction with subsequent phases. Public Works does not object to this proposal, provided that
congestion is avoided and appropriate intersection operation is maintained on Black Point Road. Ensuring this will require
preparation of a traffic study, conducting traffic monitoring, and agreement between Statesman and Public Works
regarding the level of development that will trigger the requirement for using the main site access and for related Black
Point Road improvements.
In order to determine the required improvements to Black Point Road, Statesman will conduct an engineering analysis of
the structural capacity of Black Point Road. This will include coring the roadway and underlying soils. Based on this
analysis, Statesman will propose appropriate improvements to the structural section. Statesman will also assess the
adequacy of the roadway width for the projected traffic and propose appropriate improvements. Public Works recognizes
that Statesman will provide on-site bicycle and pedestrian facilities that will reduce bicycle and pedestrian travel on Black
Point Road. Public Works also recognizes the value to both Black Point Road residents and resort guests of minimizing
roadway width in order to preserve the rural, forested nature of Black Point Road. Public Works will work with Statesman
to accommodate these goals.
Please don't hesitate to contact me to discuss these matters further.
Jim Pearson
Jefferson County Public Works Department
623 Sheridan Street
Port Townsend, WA 98368
(360) 385-9162
(360) 385-9234 Fax
lu l D1u M:7\►1110LVA I
Jefferson County
Department of Public Works
623 Sheridan St.
Port Townsend, WA 98368
(360) 385-9160
Frank Gifford, Public Works Director
Monte Reinders, P.E., County Engineer
TO: David W. Johnson, Associate Planner
Department of Community Development
FROM: James W. Pearson, Project Manager
DATE: November 30, 2016
RE: ZON08-00056 Brinnon Master Planned Resort
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) scoping comments
The SEIS will supplement the Programmatic EIS adopted for the Comprehensive Plan approval
of the Master Planned Resort designation and assess impacts related to Jefferson County's
adoption of.
• Amendments to the Jefferson County Code Title 17 Master Planned Resorts and Title 18
Unified Development Code and
• A Brinnon Master Planned Resort Development Agreement.
This memo provides the Department's comments on the scoping notice for the referenced
proposal.
The Department has also reviewed a draft Development Agreement proposed by the developer
and comments by the Department of Community Development. This memo provides the
Department's preliminary comments on the draft Development Agreement.
A. Supplemental EIS Scoping
The Programmatic EIS (PEIS) assessed existing and projected roadway conditions on Highway
101 and County Roads, including Black Point County Road. It identified significant impacts to
the Highway 101 / Black Point Road intersection, the initial segment of Black Point Road from
Highway 101 to the marina entrance intersection, and the subsequent segment of Black Point
Road to the golf resort entrance at +/-Mile Post 0+70.
The PEIS included specific mitigation measures for the Highway 101 / Black Point Road
intersection and the initial segment of Black Point Road. These mitigations have been
incorporated into preliminary roadway improvement plans that were prepared by the developer's
engineering consultant and have been reviewed by the Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT) through its Plan For Approval process. These impacts and mitigations
do not require additional analysis in the SEIS
The PEIS noted that Black Point Road does not have an adequate structural section or roadway
width to accommodate the projected traffic. It states that prior to development of the golf course
the developer will "(f)ully fund and construct improvements for Black Point Road to meet
County standards from US Highway 101 to the project entrance."
Public Works Department Comment: The MPR Development Agreement should include
provisions to ensure that this mitigation measure is implemented.
B. Development Agreement
Public Works Department General Comment:
Development of the MPR will require significant clearing and grading and construction of public
and private roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, utilities, and stormwater management
facilities. Ensuring that these improvements comply with the project plans and adopted County
standards and specifications will require plan reviews, construction inspections, materials
sampling and testing, and final project review. It will require that construction is conducted
under the supervision of a licensed project engineer and that prior to final approval the project
engineer certifies that the improvements comply with the project plans and the County's
standards and specifications.
In order to ensure this, the Development Agreement should include a section that provides for a
Memorandum of Agreement between the developer and the Jefferson County Public Works
Department. The MOA should specify development standards and procedures for plan review,
construction inspections, and materials sampling and testing. It should require supervision by the
project engineer. The MOA should also require that the developer will reimburse the Department
for expenses related to the project. The Development Agreement should require the MOA to be
agreed upon prior to initial site development.
Development Agreement Section 1.3.13 addresses "the provision of public services necessary
to the site [which] are subject to memorandums of understanding with public service agencies for
sewer, water, schools, police/security, fire/EMS and transit...." It refers to MOU N-4
Transportation.
Public Works Department Comment: This list should include roads and bicycle and pedestrian
facilities. A Memorandum that addresses these facilities should be provided to the Department
for review and comment.
Development Agreement Section 3.13 Transportation refers solely to public transportation
services that would be provided by Jefferson Transit.
Public Works Department Comment: As noted above, transportation services and facilities
should be expanded to include roads and bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
Development Agreement Section 4.2.1 Prior EIS states that "...prior EISs reviewed potential
impacts and mitigation... on a programmatic level and were not project -specific EISs."
Public Works Department Comment: The intent and implications of this statement should be
clarified. The transportation impacts and mitigations identified in the Programmatic EIS were
related to the designation of the Master Planned Resort. These mitigations include improvements
to the Highway 101 / Black Point Road intersection, the initial segment of Black Point Road to
the marina entrance intersection, and the subsequent segment of Black Point Road to the golf
resort entrance at +/-Mile Post 0+70. The mitigations should be implemented in conjunction with
the initial site development and should not be subject to additional project -specific SEPA review.
Development Agreement Section 5.1 Preliminary Facilities addresses facilities that must be
constructed in conjunction with the initial phase of development. Section 5. 1.1 Transportation
specifies that this includes "the entrance road at Black Point Road connecting to both the golf
course entrance and the marina entrance (including the improvements to link with the WDOE
[sic] ramp)."
Public Works Department Comment:
The list of preliminary transportation facilities does not include improvements to the Highway
101 / Black Point Road intersection or to the segment of Black Point Road from the marina
entrance intersection to the golf resort entrance at +/-Mile Post 0+70. These improvements
should be included in Section 5. 1.1 Transportation. The Development Agreement should specify
that, in conjunction with the application for the golf resort site development, the proponent will
provide an engineering analysis of the Black Point Road structural section and proposed
improvements to the roadway structural section and width. The improvements would be
constructed prior to final plat approval of the golf resort or, at the discretion of the County
Engineer, could be constructed later provided that the developer posts appropriate surety.