HomeMy WebLinkAbout029Michelle Farfan
From: David W. Johnson <dwjohnson@co.jefferson.wa.us>
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 8:36 AM
To: Stacie Hoskins; Al Scalf
Subject: FW: Coordination re: June 16 Meeting
Attachments: PH-ComparisonOfAlternatives-SEIS-Junl4-10-v4.doc;
CommentsOnMay5AlternativeSitePlans-Junl4-10.doc; v3 -PH -Construction Narrative-
May29-10-With Notes-TracksAccepted.doc
FYI — for today's MPR and tomorrow's BMPR meeting.
From: VMorrisCS@aol.com [mailto:VMorrisCS@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 6:05 PM
To: David W. Johnson
Cc: peckassoc@comcast.net
Subject: Coordination re: June 16 Meeting
Hello David.
Agenda items I had in mind for our meeting on Wednesday, June 16 include:
1. Site Plan Alternatives to be Evaluated in the SEIS
2. Matrix of Comparative Information about the Alternatives
3. Phasing Plans
4. Construction Sequence Narrative
5. Narrative Description of the Proposal
A) Uniform introductory information to include in each Technical Report.
B) Sufficient information to describe every element of the proposal listed in PDSEIS Chapter 2.
6. Consolidated Instructions for Finalizing the Draft Technical Reports
7. Anything else you would like to discuss related to the monthly Status Report (5/25/10 most recent version).
Craig and I are prepared to discuss items 1 through 4. 1 have described below the status of each of these agenda items
Alternative Site Plans and Comparative Matrix. The level of effort required to review and comment on the Alternative
site plans and Phasing Plans, and to update the matrix that compares the features of the Alternatives, consumed my
available time to prepare for the meeting on June 16th. I sent to you via Federal Express today the 5/05/10 draft
Alternative site plans including mark-ups that consolidate Craig's comments and mine on these 15 drawings. I have
attached to this message the 6/14/10 narrative summary of our comments on the Alternative site plans, and the updated
comparative matrix (6/14/10). This is a complex amount of information. I doubt that you will feel you have thoroughly
reviewed the Alternatives and Phasing Plans by the time we are scheduled to meet on Wednesday.
Phasing Plans and Construction Sequence. I included a set of the 5/05/10 draft Phasing Plans in the Fed Ex package I
sent to you today, marked with a consolidated set of comments prepared by Craig and me. I have attached to this
message the 5/29/10 Construction Sequencing Narrative in which I entered some comments to be addressed by Craig.
To my knowledge, the project architect has not prepared a drawing of proposed repair and replacement at the existing
Marina Village to submit to the County for a determination whether these improvements can proceed separately, or
whether they will be an element of the MPR proposal. I would like this to be clear before we convey project description
and phasing information to the technical consultants. Craig indicated to me this morning that he will take the initiative to
prepare the repair/replacement proposal for Garth's review.
Narrative Description of the Proposal. I have not received any additional information from Statesman to complete
narrative descriptions of elements of the proposal listed in the 2/16/10 draft I prepared for SEIS Chapter 2. 1 have,
however, been in communication with consultants retained by Statesman to request detailed and project -specific
information about unique elements of the proposal, including use of the EarthRenew product, the co -generation proposal
(integrated with the geothermal proposal), and the lighting proposal. I provided outlines for the reports I would like to
receive from these consultants, and requested draft reports by mid-June.
Technical Report Review and Comments. I have not yet completed my detailed comments on each of the technical
reports to identify additional requirements for these reports to fully support SEIS preparation (mostly related to the impact
analysis of the site plan alternatives and no action, and the formulation of mitigation measures with emphasis on
Alternative 3). Craig suggested that we could use our time this week to discuss a representative example, looking at
County staff comments, Peer Review Team comments, and my comments to prepare the consolidated list of
requirements for additional work to finalize a draft technical report. I suggest that we use his Grading and Drainage
Technical Report (9/04/09 draft) for this example.
There are six technical reports not yet prepared/submitted to the County for draft review:
The Earth Renew Proposal for Soil Amendment
The Co -Generation Proposal
The Lighting Proposal
The Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis*
General Sewer Plan (to be coordinated with the Department of Ecology)
Comprehensive Water Plan (to be coordinated with the Department of Health)
* I have not yet received a proposal for the GHG Emissions Analysis pending receipt of draft reports on the EarthRenew
proposal and Co -Generation proposal. These are unique project elements. I advised the GHG emission consultant to wait
to review these draft reports because of the significant affect they will have on his scope of work.
Question for You: Would it be most beneficial to meet on Wednesday, or should we do a conference call to touch base
and clarify the direction we are proceeding at this time? I anticipate a need for a meeting when you, Stacie, Craig and I
are all ready to discuss the Alternative site plans, Phasing Plans, and all of the reports. What is the status of your
preparation with regard to the technical reports?
If we do a conference call in lieu of a meeting on Wednesday, I would suggest that you initiate the call at 11:00 (or shortly
thereafter) when you are through with your duties at the counter.
Let me know your preference. We're ready to proceed either way
Thank you,
Vicki
Vicki Morris Consulting Services
7732 18th Avenue NE
Seattle, WA 98115-4426
206.522.8057
Cellular: 206.501.8227
FAX: 206.523.4648
`M
ii
cq
N
00
N
u
)
p. E
U
.�..�� bAU
N
C
�
>N
4CA 4
cl
IQ
0
00
a
O ce
eD
b
ti aki $
'C�
.�
A:
bDM
u O
h
omaARP�Z
�«,
oni°o��,
a.
c�o
En
oocq
o�xu
C)
>y^"mov
>
.+
`teaami�'
�> ohm ed
� �'' mM
a a�wb
°w
O
�� C
a)
C'
C,3 p 'v,
�.1 oC7
�C7�
�•�x�C7.5v�.5C7.��.°¢�v�.��
O U
y U 0
y U
v
s°',W��C7�
�Cni
as
U k" 4.
M
00
O
ca
Ob
O
h
NA y
y48
N
N
N
O
O
o
y
+
-T bA
00
U
>
�• —
CA �
C
3
U
°
on
M
�
o
�o �'�•a
°
�
�w�
���
•�.�,
a ��y �
O`=
moo,
M.m
o
U N
U
p 'o
as
=
M
U
cF�-
��
3 an
o
ens�w
b
b
a�>
°w'ai
v
ti
a c�.
SO
ami oC,3d
cn.
2¢�
y
C o
4.4
�
'O
s.9
+.
° N
C
aCi
10.1
ao
on N
p
^
y
o
o
�^
O
O N
C
G
vO
O
.0
+�-
_�
v,
R
U
ri p
7
c
'b
Z-0
°bb
�0
a�
F°>^�
�_ a�cud
C,3 ° as V1 cc
rte.•
�,q •�""i
'"
w b
.7 a�
� G�
QUI �"' U N
.� b •�'a�
'� � '� "O" '� �
I�j
.�•� � .�
.a 0 a
C7 a
3
� C7 •
Gq � GG °
�
&0
=0
43 (7
`M
ii
N
V °4.
Cda��•o
+C4°
3a°
^ani
aoi
wo 0�3R
i
°
C GO
�„ aOi
a v
.d
O 4r A O
U
py GJ
.� U
0 R y,cd
O Q
x000W o
cncq
o
CdQ
SO 0. ��
cao
`+Op
0
c =-a
c�°° � � � °=
"o�o
� a�>
vd
u C
>, a'"i •X °�' A
F y bA N
A
.y
c
O U O u
ti v� R b
a3i
.a y .C." a�
C C '�
N bA a>
a.. O at Q n
O �� E ,'C °�° O
z
R�� �
O 3
N
U
C
�'.
e„
.�R.
>
a� .fl :"
Z on b ti a
° j C
a •Cda)
S � O
y > O
Lyi cC U
sU• a °
r+ s. bUq N ��,
y� pA C ^O 7
to
cCRf,„
..�
cqs C's cu
Hw gra _Sz
�� �a �
Uc7Hav�>�
3 �zw
ri ami
b
c
M
`
wa�3on
Op
CA
0C93
M>��
o
N
DC7 a�
w
Qn
oe
r.o°,
00
s. Opo
co
0
N
OAb
+~O.
as �' R
C w
Ex
R cob1D
t w
y 0
U'
a°
h
R
OA
cd
OA
N y
tn
co
G
A3
F--
0U 3
o_
�CA_�
o .o°,$ � 0
o
°'off -i
Z
; 30W
r
Cd
'-o�o�'•`�o°
bA
Aa
QO'�i
qR
cd w
O
L
FO cN�0
.
caod�
Z 3 coo
Os0
a�
;e .
zW.0
a�
En
In.
c�
L U y
N
° mo �
� a o
cam°'
3 0 0
Cd
GM
0 v �.
0
p
O O may, O
V�
0
cd
IZ
Cd -tj
^
OA
E u5
y R O
CZ
b==oo,
0 0
U
0 ami a> 0 3
L
w ai v
.0
y a0i
Cd
c
cd
r� Z
'� ^0
C'J m U0.
F u �
.0 bUA N U
O>
Ha—
>
zw2>
N
M
V
O
O N
C
O
Sa
O O
Q
O l
cd
`°'C
cqj°ter,00
WD
Q0
>
O
O
C
a
Qr
U >~ SA'b
G V]
cqs
C [�
tw
of E
a :+
y U❑ 'a+ ¢
Q
o
a 3tu,,
•
y
y a0i [� Q
y O
u 3 �, °
p
'�
O..
; Eig
C
y
C y
N
C
h
,rvo
uN cd
am.
� •0 �
cC -�''.
•Rt �+
•C�
O
,-�''�
Q>
C N 05
..
C p y p O +�'"-+
E O.
4C,3i
°x°
� v°
� � �
°
oU
, 0, :
°en�.�
- 9
A
E p°
w
F C
C7,
.b
a�'i
Nix
4.
°
I
p yCd W'
0 w
' °
y },
O O
O O
a>
CL * b
CL °
p cd
cq
�o'
�
�.. p
V C O N
L ccs
GS
as •� N°
w y .f'�"
cd
C •.� 4.
bp
fm
ml
a y 3
E 4"
W > $s,
u c
c E
o
Cda
6�
b
1 � L"r ^�
u
s,
-;
� A, •s'
•b
°a•�
oxo^IML
R
bD � U
� O
Cd
C U
�
d
u
C �
as �' ,� � a�
.,•�
� o o
H �
o .. .°
�p �- „ ° >
� }' �
„ � �;
CIS E
Oo`°o•oCo.bo
Eoa°i
oAp
ao3zawU
c�U
3fJ. 3 �e 30
o
d.0 E
u
° u
�
O N
bo o
a}i
ap
v°i
b
3
4.
aN
°
o,,
21
o u
10
vCL
A
O
N y N
O 3 N
"
44.
c%
w
96 0
`o ?b
O�U
a°°
o
a o
W
o 3�
a-�
O
u "'•� ° O�
U
>°
Ag
Cd Cd
z
rn
`d�
O=
•'� � b .d �
C '"' 'O
R
N
Ccd
>~aq a>
^E
a Omxz
ani su,�Q
C
3 R)
WU
'd
3w ti an Al
our-
M
v
O
>, N
0 c N
p
c� •C�
Cd
Cd 00 cd -7
y D U
cid
N W
o c 3 °o
c y och'°"
a a v
Oco
v
pp Cd~ 0 3
rn
ami
'A
•� � o
-0 >
taC=O
C
p W bA
to
'd
O l y
�
��� o
�o 3
o
3o 0-
N o -o ami
°�'
'
.Cd
�oQ�°'a
aoa
as
P:4 r
o "I '�
o '
ami
cs: cv°cE�,�
w
Cd
° c',
00
0 0
0. ami o=
°
i° d
� b
U s•. � 5�, �
'0 �"
bA
b
y �
o cd
O
.'.
W
C
E Fy
A
CC
y �
�• yF"'^Oc
v �
� k
aLi
>.U5N�c
�w
�O yy
� "0 3'
� Cd
aw `
O E m o
7 o ^° ^�
d '~"
L 0 z
0
b
Cd
C om.+ •+"
Vi 'o,
D N
�Oy..�
Gi w ,
y N b(1 p �o+
i��
O
O
C
>
O
YO
y
O
S3
cl
O
�i
bA
ai ly
z �.
p
N• \
v \
� O
d to
U
~
L ~
N
0 >
>
O
cd
� .S
y
y
E
v
Preliminary Outline for DRAFT
Construction Phasing and Sequencing
Pleasant Harbor
[Craig: This narrative appears to emphasize earthwork with a bit about utilities. For the EIS, I would like
to have a narrative description by phase to accompany the Phasing Plans Natalie has prepared. Also,
please correlate the description below to the numbered drainage basins on your Drainage Basin maps —
Existing or Developed Condition, as appropriate.]
PHASE 1
[Craig: Please also insert subheadings for PHASE 2 and PHASE 3 where appropriate.]
1. The first required action on the site will be creation of the wetland in the bottom of the south kettle
(Kettle C). This kettle is to be a created wetland with an enhanced buffer. The bottom of the basin will be
filled approximately 30 feet to create a relatively level wetland. Buffer enhancement may take the form
of clearing invasive plant species and replacement with native plant material. Irrigation for the wetland
and the buffer plantings may be required. Following completion a fence would be placed around the
buffer edge to prevent construction activities from damaging the vegetation.
[Craig: Please describe the fill material you propose to use, and how hydrology will be maintained for
wetland conditions. Also, please describe source and type of plant material; i.e., to be relocated from
existing wetlands on-site to be filled, or to be purchased from a nursery?]
2. It will be necessary to place erosion control measures and perhaps redirect runoff into the large kettle
(Kettle B) prior to clearing and rough grading to create the materials processing site/plant(s). [Craig: Can
we use a more descriptive term like aggregate processing, or sand and gravel processing?] The relatively
flat, centrally -located site for materials processing is at the base of one of several 40+ foot cut areas. This
will be the source of construction materials and fill material for early portions of the project. Clearing
must be limited to the edge of the existing drainage basin to the south in order to allow work into the wet
season. Reforming the drainage basin southward will allow for additional clearing. [Please describe.]
Existing roads could be used to transport materials.
3. Construct the first cogeneration unit between Kettles B and C to provide power for the operation of the
materials processing plant(s) and to operate the domestic water supply pumps. Clearing and grading for
this facility would be minimal if it is located to the east of Fairway 2 tees.
4. Erosion control measures will be installed along the base of the wastewater treatment plant site prior to
clearing. Fill material will be placed behind a retaining wall to create the site for the wastewater treatment
plant. Treatment plant construction would begin immediately in Phase 1 in order to be completed when
the Marina Village building is complete.
5. A water storage facility will be constructed for domestic supply and initial building phase fire
protection.
6. Develop the second on-site well. Connect the well to the domestic water distribution and storage
system as soon as is practical after rough grading of the areas through which that piping must pass.
7. Place erosion control measures along the edge of the buffer area along the east property line prior to
clearing. Grade the building, parking, and entry roads to prepare this area for construction.
5129110 v3
8. Install erosion control measures, implement traffic controls, and relocate utilities in preparation for
constructing improvements to the Black Point Road/Highway 101 intersection relocation and expansion.
Completion of this phase should occur earlier or coincide with completion of the Marina Village building
and parking areas. Underground utility services must cross Black Point Road. Relocation of the State
boat launch access road will be part of this process.
9. Begin clearing drainage basins that have no runoff leaving the site and that will offer excavated
material for processing or mass fill of Kettles B and C.1 The entire Kettle B area will be cleared. Large
areas of deep excavation lie to the south, west, and north of the kettle. Kettle B will receive approximately
1,000,000 CY of fill before it can be finished -graded and lined to start receiving site runoff and effluent
from the treatment plant. Liners could be installed during the wet season but dry season installation is
preferred. Channels and culverts to be constructed will convey surface water runoff overflows to
infiltration areas. [Craig: Where — within the kettle?]
10. Place erosion control measures along the east property line buffer area near Black Point Road to
prepare this area for construction of the Terrace 1 access road. Excavated materials from the maintenance
building area and Fairways 3 and 4 could be used to construct this road embankment. Install the storm
drainage system within the road to direct runoff to stormwater treatment and detention facilities.
11. Completing the Terrace 1 (?) building pad and parking areas may not require significant erosion
control measures since the runoff can be directed to the enclosed drainage basin to the south.
12. Install the sewage collection system, water distribution system, fire protection system (fairway
irrigation mains), reuse water systems, power transmission, and communications facilities to serve the
wastewater treatment plant, Terrace 1, and the maintenance building/staff quarters.
13. Install erosion control measures and clear sufficient area during the dry season to construct the
embankment for Fairway 10 and the runoff interceptor/detention pond. This embankment will continue
north to include building sites, another interceptor/detention pond, and significant portions of Fairways 7
and 8. Large areas of excavation lie to the east and west of Fairway 10 and the building site to the north.
These ponds will be lined to prevent saturation of the embankment. Pumps will be permanently installed
adjacent to these ponds to move collected runoff northward into the next drainage basin. Construction of
the embankment, ponds, pumps, forcemains, and soil stabilization must be completed during the dry
season. It might be necessary to delay completion of Fairways 7, 8, 9, 10 and part of Fairway 11 until the
next dry season.
14. Install erosion control and wetland buffer area protection along the west side of Wetland D (along the
east property line) before work begins on Fairways 2, 4, 5, and 6. Since this drainage basin discharges to
Wetland D and then offsite, it may require that clearing and grading in this area occur in the dry season.
Very large subsurface infiltration galleries are planned beneath these fairways. Excavation depths of 20
feet will be common within these fairways to finished grade. Cuts to 30 feet will be required in some
areas. Excavations of more than 10 feet below finished grades will be required for the infiltration piping
and select backfill. These fairways will require stabilization before the wet season begins.
15. Fairways 1, north of 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18 could be worked during wet weather. The area
north of Fairway 14 may require additional erosion control measures near the wastewater treatment plant
site in order to work during that period. The preferred method of fairway construction will proceed in the
order of clearing and grubbing, rough grading, drainage installation, irrigation installation, fine grading,
and seeding progressing along the fairways using specialized types of equipment. This allows a
1 This clearing may not be allowed until it is demonstrated that the replacement wetland is successful.
2 5/29/10 0
minimum of clearing and grubbing to occur and decreases the amount of time the ground is not being
actively worked. The fairway in many cases can be seeded and stabilized before the wet season arrives.
16. Rough grades for roads and building pads can be prepared as part of fairway construction.
Installation of underground wet and dry utilities can be delayed until those phases of building
construction occur. Sanitary sewer service requires pumping of raw sewage from the south central and
southeast portions of the site. Two pump stations will be required. One will be located near the south
end of the pond (Kettle B) and another will be located at the end of the road near Fairway 9.
3 5129110 v3
Comments on Pleasant Harbor Site Plan Alternatives
May 5, 2010 Versions
GLOBAL COMMENTS RE: EACH OF THE ALTERNATIVE SITE PLANS
Notes:
• Making these edits to the alternative site plans will increase the chance for consistency in technical
report write-ups and minimize the edits that need to be made to those. Thank you.
• Please use your best judgment re: the location and legible font size for callouts; mark-ups are a
rough approximation only.
1. We think these figures could work as 8'/2 x I I's (rather than 11 x 17's) if the font size is increased in
the Legend, title block, and all "callouts" (i.e., labels).
2. Please be sure the base map is consistent for all three alternatives. If was some actual change over
time, please identify this with a callout.
3. For example, why does the rectangular parcel appear on the west side of U.S. Highway 101 on the
Alternative 2 and 3 base maps, but no Alternative 1? Recommend deleting this parcel boundary as it
is not an element of the MPR proposal.
4. Please be consistent with the Alternative 1 base map in the illustrating UNNAMED STREAMS AND
DRAINAGE COURSES between U.S. Highway 101 and Pleasant Harbor. Also, is there a reason why
two rectangular shapes are shown within the existing marina on the Alternative 2 and 3 site plans
when only one rectangle is shown on the Alternative 1 site plan?
5. Please remove the Vicinity Map and conceptual graphics from the right side of the alternative site
plans. A separate Vicinity Map will precede these drawings in the SEIS, and the conceptual drawings
are out of date and therefore misrepresent what is proposed (particularly in the Marina Village area).
6. With the available space that will remain, I suggest stacking the north arrow and scale (rather than
side-by-side) and increasing the size of these so they are easy for reviewers to locate and use. (The
fact that the north orientation differs between the overall site plans and the separate site plans of the
Marina Village and Golf Course/Resort is significant for reviewers to notice.) You could also increase
the size of the boxes (and the font size) that state your firm name, figure title and date so that the
figure identifying information is larger.
7. Please fix the scale on the enlargements of the Marina Village and the enlargements of the Golf
Course/Resort (all three alternatives). The same scale is used as that for the overall site plans, so it is
not correct on the enlargements. Scale indicated in the lower left-hand corner of each drawing
(associated with the "dot" that identifies the drawing number) should be deleted at this location.
8. Please update in the title block the date the revised figures were prepared.
9. Please delete or replace labels in colored areas that are too small to be legible (see mark-ups).
10. Craig is having Paul check the Area Calculations in the Legend: Impervious, Pervious, and Natural.
Results requested by the week of 6/14/10.
11. Please label the Fairways (FAIRWAY 1, FAIRWAY 2, etc.) on every overall site plan and every Golf
Course/Resort site plan. (Craig's preference to call them "Fairways" rather than "Holes.") Please do
not include the number of yards or par information. (The fairways will be used as points of reference
in the text re: the location of things on the site plan in relation to some of the golf course fairways.)
12. Label U.S. HIGHWAY 101 and BLACK POINT ROAD on all site plans. Please enter these labels within
the road right-of-way lines or parallel to it (see mark-ups provided), and spell out Highway rather
than abbreviating it.
13. Please label MARINA ACCESS DRIVE (PROPOSED) between the marina and Black Point Road (see
mark-ups).
14. Please distinguish on each site plan proposed modifications/improvements to Black Point Road.
Comments on 5105110 Alternative Site Plans
Vicki with input from Craig: 6114/10
15. Please show the WDFW BOAT LAUNCH AND ACCESS ROAD on each of the Overall and Marina
Village site plans, and indicate on the Alternative 3 site plans the proposed realignment of the
intersection of this access road with Black Point Road.
16. Label KETTLE B (the large kettle to be used for reclaimed water storage), KETTLE C (the smaller of
the two kettles, the one in which a wetland will be created), WETLAND C between Fairways 1 and 2,
and WETLAND D along the east boundary (see mark-ups provided).
17. Label UNNAMED STREAMS north of the Marina Village. If there are other unnamed streams through
the Marina Village residential units (closer to Black Point Road), please also label these.
18. Please turn off the layer that shows wetland and stream buffer lines on these drawings. We will have
enlargements made of these features for use in the Wetlands and Streams section of the SEIS.
19. Please revise the name of the Management Center in the Legend to MAINTENANCE BUILDING AND
STAFF QUARTERS.
20. Please revise the name of the Water Treatment Plant to WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT on all
drawings.
21. Please delete the word "The" from Legend entries; for example, Tlie-Marina and Maritime Village,
Tow -Golf Terraces-& and Conference Center/Spa, Tke-Marina Townhomes. Please spell out the word
"and."
22. Identify what each of the lines is along the south boundary of the Golf Course/Resort area, or delete
those that are not necessary. The only two I know of that should be there are: 200 -FT SHORELINE
ENVIRONMENT (200 feet landward from the Ordinary High Water Mark of the tideland area below),
and RIPARIAN BUFFER AND STEEP SLOPE CONSERVATION TRACT. (I suggest this change in
wording after reviewing BoCC Condition 63s that this conservation tract it is intended to satisfy). If
there are other superfluous lines (or bits of topography), please remove them. Note: the conservation
tract should not be identified on the Alternative 1 site plan.
23. I have requested a separate figure for each alternative to show existing and proposed utilities:
EXISTING WELL LOCATION, PROPOSED WELL LOCATION (of which there may be more than one),
MONITORING WELL LOCATION (more than one; please be sure these are called Monitories Wells
rather than Monitor Wells), WATER STORAGE FACILITY, CO -GENERATION PLANT LOCATION (of
which there may be more than one), GEOTHERMAL FACILITY LOCATION, SANITARY SEWER PUMP
STATION (more than one), STORMWATER PUMP STATION (more than one), IRRIGATION/FIRE
PUMP STATION, GENERATOR/CONTROL BUILDING (more than one), and any other utility elements
on each site plan (for what was proposed at the time). Please label these using a font size that is large
enough for them to be legible on 8'/2 x 11 -inch drawings (preferred).
24. I have requested a separate figure for each alternative to show existing and proposed recreational
amenities, such as: TENNIS COURT, BOCCE BALL COURT, EXISTING SWIMMING POOL, FIRE PIT
(more than one?), PICNIC TABLE (more than one?), RESTROOM BUILDING (more than one?) Please
label these and any other existing or proposed recreational amenities using a font size that is large
enough for them to be legible on 8'/2 x 11 -inch drawings (preferred).
Alternative 1: Overall Site Plan
• Make Global Comment revisions to the Alternative 1 base map.
• Label the MARINA AND MARITIME VILLAGE, and the GOLF COURSE AND RESORT areas of the site
(see mark-up provided).
• Please sum TOTAL RESIDENTIAL: 890 UNITS and TOTAL DEVELOPMENT: _ SF beneath the
Legend on this site plan.
• Identify VISITOR PARKING near the intersection of Black Point Road with U.S. Highway 101. (This
preceded the transit center proposal).
• Identify the 200 -FT SHORELINE ENVIRONMENT along the south boundary. Remove the blue line;
there was no conservation tract in Alternative 1 (as I understand it).
2 Comments on 5105110 Alternative Site Plans
Vicki with input from Craig: 6114110
Show the WDFW BOAT LAUNCH ACCESS ROAD on the Alternative 1 base map with its existing
intersection configuration at Black Point Road. (It is my understanding that the proposal to
reconfigure this intersection did not occur until the Alternative 2 site plan.)
It appears that there was a proposal in this alternative to create a stream between the northernmost
golf course pond (a manmade pond?) and Kettle C, and from Kettle C to a manmade pond along the
south side of Fairway 10. If this was the case, please label each of these features on this site plan.
Include clarifying in parentheses STREAM (TO BE CONSTRUCTED).
The Alternative 1 site plan also shows some ponds that are not existing wetlands that appear to be
GOLF COURSE PONDS/WETLANDS (TO BE CREATED). If this is the case, please label them this way.
Alternative 1: Marina Village
• Be sure the Global Comment revisions appear on this site plan.
• Please sum the total number of residential units below the Legend: SUBTOTAL RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT: 151 UNITS.
• Please add the Marina Village COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT proposal in the same format as that
used on the Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 site plans (described below and illustrated on the mark-
ups provided).
• Please add lines (in different colors) that indicate the 200 -FT SHORELINE ENVIRONMENT, and the
50 -FT SHORELINE BUFFER that was in effect at the time this Marina Village site plan was evaluated
in the FEIS.
Alternative 1: Golf Course/Resort
• Be sure the Global Comment revisions appear on this site plan.
• Also make the same revisions as those requested on the Alternative 1 Overall Site Plan with regard to
existing and proposed wetlands, ponds, and streams.
• Please sum the total number of residential units below the Legend: SubTotal Residential
Development: 739 UNITS.
• Please add the Golf Course/Resort COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT proposal in the same format as
that used on the edited Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 site plans.
• Modify the 200' Shoreline Boundary callout along the south edge of the site (red line) as follows:
200 -FT SHORELINE ENVIRONMENT (two locations). Please remove the blue line from the
Alternative 1 base map, as the Riparian Buffer and Steep Slope Conservation Tract was not an
element of this alternative.
• Label the TURN BUILDING.
• On the Alternative 1: Proposed Utilities figure, please label the WATER WALL andE"-
RECLAIMED WATER MECHANICAL (BUILDING?) AND PUMPS with a large enough font to be
legible. (If "Mechanical" refers to some kind of closure, please add the word BUILDING.) Please
provide (in an e-mail message to me) a narrative description of the WATER WALL and the
purpose/function of this feature in the Driving Range.
• Please increase the font size of the CONTROL GATE label, and provide a narrative description (in an
e-mail message to me) of the purpose and function of this gate at the Resort entrance. (For example,
would the gate be manned? Card -operated? What provisions will be made for emergency vehicle
access?)
Comments on 5105110 Alternative Site Plans
Vicki with input from Craig: 6114/10
Alternative 2: Overall Site Plan
• Make Global Comment revisions to the Alternative 2 base map.
• Please sum TOTAL RESIDENTIAL: 890 UNITS and TOTAL COMMERCIAL: 53,000 SF beneath the
Legend.
• Please revise the term "Water Touch Townhomes" (in the Legend) to SEA VIEW CHALETS.
• Label the MARINA AND MARITIME VILLAGE, and the GOLF COURSE AND RESORT areas of the site
(see mark-up provided).
• Label VISITOR PARKING adjacent to (north and south of) the intersection of Black Point Road with
U.S. Highway 101. (The Transit Center proposal is an element only of Alternative 3.)
• Show the WDFW BOAT LAUNCH ACCESS ROAD AND INTERSECTION MODIFICATION on the
Alternative 2 base map and Marina Village site plans (same as Alternative 3).
• What is the "eyebrow" shaped water feature north of the Driving Range? Please label this on the
Alternative 2 Overall Site Plan and Golf Course/Resort site plan.
• There are several dots and small rectangles in various locations. If these are remnants from an earlier
base map, please remove them. It their purpose is to indicate the location of utilities or recreational
amenities, please call these out on the separate figures I have requested: Alternative 2: Existing and
Proposed Recreational Amenities, and Alternative 2: Existing and Proposed Utilities (8'/z x 11
preferred).
Alternative 2: Marina Village
• Be sure the Global Comment revisions appear on this site plan.
• Please sum the total number of residential units below the Legend: SUBTOTAL RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT: 82 UNITS, and add SUBTOTAL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT: 17,000 SF beneath
this (see mark-up provided).
• Label the EXISTING RESIDENCE: PLEASANT HARBOR HOUSE.
• I have added several labels to this site plan, including the EXISTING SWIMMING POOL. It seems
more consistent to identify the pool this way rather than in the Legend.
• Please revise the term "Water Touch Townhomes" (in the Legend) to SEA VIEW CHALETS on the
Alternative 2 site plan.
• Please add lines (in different colors) that indicate the 200 -FT SHORELINE ENVIRONMENT, and the
50 -FT SHORELINE BUFFER that was in effect at the time this site plan was evaluated in the FEIS.
Alternative 2: Golf Course/Resort
• Be sure the Global Comment revisions appear on this site plan.
• Please sum the total number of residential units below the Legend entries: SUBTOTAL RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT: 808 UNITS. And beneath this: SUBTOTAL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT: 36,000
SF.
• Enter lines in two colors that distinguish between the 200 -FT SHORELINE ENVIRONMENT and
RIPARIAN BUFFER AND STEEP SLOPE CONSERVATION TRACT along the south boundary.
• Label the TURN BUILDING. If the Turn Building is smaller in this alternative, please indicate square
footage on both the Alternative I and Alternative 2 Golf Course/Resort site plans for comparison. If
there is no Turn Building in Alternative 2, please send me an explanation (in an e-mail message) re:
why it was eliminated.
4 Comments on 5105110 Alternative Site Plans
Vicki with input from Craig: 6114110
Alternative 3: Overall Site Plan
• Make Global Comment revisions to the Alternative 3 base map.
• What are the "Miscellaneous Buildings" indicated in the Legend? I don't see any buildings marked
with this color. Also, there should be no miscellaneous buildings that are not clearly described and
accounted for.
• Please sum TOTAL RESIDENTIAL: 890 UNITS and TOTAL COMMERCIAL: 56,500 SF beneath the
Legend on this site plan.
• Label the MARINA AND MARITIME VILLAGE, and the GOLF COURSE AND RESORT areas of the site
(if there's room; see the Alternative 1 site plan see mark-up provided).
• Label the JEFFERSON/MASON COUNTY TRANSIT CENTER (PROPOSED).
• Similar to the Alternative 2 site plan, please label the "eyebrow" shaped water feature north of the
Driving Range on the Alternative 3 Overall Site Plan and Golf Course/Resort site plan.
Alternative 3: Marina Village
• Be sure the Global Comment revisions appear on this site plan.
• Please sum the total number of residential units below the Legend: SUBTOTAL RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT: 61 UNITS. And beneath this, sum SUBTOTAL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT:
20,500 SF.
• Label the EXISTING MARINA CENTER. In a slightly smaller font, label all existing uses; for example,
the MARINA OFFICE, DELI, GROCERY AND CONVENIENCE STORE and the LAUNDRY AND
RESTROOMs BUILDING (see mark-up provided).
• Label the EXISTING RESIDENCE: PLEASANT HARBOR HOUSE, and the BED AND BREAKFAST
GUESTHOUSE (OWNED BY OTHERS) that is not an element of the MPR proposal.
• Please add lines (in different colors) that indicate the 200 -FT SHORELINE ENVIRONMENT, and the
150 -FT SHORELINE BUFFER (rather than 150' SETBACK) now in effect.
• Callout the PROPOSED REALIGNMENT OF WDFW BOAT LAUNCH ACCESS ROAD INTERSECTION
with Black Point Road (see mark-up provided).
Alternative 3: Golf Course/Resort
• Be sure the Global Comment revisions appear on this site plan.
• Please sum the total number of residential units below the Legend: SUBTOTAL RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT: 829 UNITS. Add beneath this: SUBTOTAL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT: 36,000
SF (see mark-up provided).
• Enter lines in two colors that distinguish between the 200 -FT SHORELINE ENVIRONMENT and
RIPARIAN BUFFER AND STEEP SLOPE CONSERVATION TRACT along the south boundary.
• Please provide a narrative explanation (in an e-mail message to me) re: why there is no TURN
BUILDING between Fairways 9 and 10 in the southeast corner of the golf course in Alternative 3.
Comments on 5105/10 Alternative Site Plans
Vicki with input from Craig: 6114/10