HomeMy WebLinkAbout017Michelle Farfan
From: David W. Johnson <dwjohnson@co.jefferson.wa.us>
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 20111:06 PM
To: Al Scalf; Stacie Hoskins
Subject: FW: Pleasant Harbor Files Sent 4/19/11
W
From: VMorrisCS@aol.com [mailto:VMorrisCS@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 11:32 AM
To: Garth@statesmancorporation.com; AMackie@perkinscoie.com
Cc: kevini@statesmancorporation.com; peckassoc@comcast.net; KRentz@perkinscoie.com; David W. Johnson
Subject: Pleasant Harbor Files Sent 4/19/11
Garth and Sandy:
This message summarizes the files I copied to a CD and mailed to each of you yesterday. The files are organized in five
folders on the CD, indicated by the capitalized headings below.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL AND ALTERNATIVES
Transmittal to Pleasant Harbor Team Members-Feb1-11
This document introduces all files sent to Team members on February 1 that describe and compare the alternatives to be
evaluated in the SEIS, and give instructions for completing final technical reports in a manner that will fully support SEIS
preparation. The transmittal memo describes distinctions that need to be made in the description of potential impacts (i.e.,
during construction and in the developed condition of the site), and the five categories of mitigation measures to be
addressed.
Comparison of Alternatives Chart-Feb1-11
This chart describes and compares qualitative and quantitative differences between 26 principal features of the site
plan alternatives in order to facilitate the impact analysis required in each technical report and the SEIS. This was a 7 -
month collaborative effort between Craig, Natalie, and me while final revisions were being made to the Alternative 3 site
plan.
Introduction, Narrative Description of the Alternatives, and Construction Sequencing Narrative-Feb1-11. This
document describes the process that brought the MPR to the point of needing an SEIS; provides drop-in narrative
descriptions of the three alternative site plans and the County's definition of the No Action Alternative to be evaluated in
the SEIS; and includes a detailed narrative description of the construction sequence that explains the Phasing Plans
provided for the Alternative 3 site plan. Technical team members may choose to include some or all of this information in
their reports; all of the information should be included in the SEIS. This file summarizes what team members need to
know about distinctions between alternatives and the construction proposal for their impact analysis and formulation of
mitigation measures.
LEEDS Compliance Narrative-Feb1-11
This document was a joint effort (Garth, Don and me) that explains features of the resort that will comply with the intent of
each LEED standard for which "points" are claimed. Please note that the version included on the CD is the most current.
(It supercedes the Jan20-10 version that did not describe the revised wastewater treatment/reclamation process.)
List of Amen ities-Jan31-11
This document was also a joint effort. I created the chart based on information provided by Natalie, and finalized it with
input from Garth. Please note that the version included on the CD is the most current and supercedes the Jan15-11
version previously circulated.
Residential Unit Calculation by Alternative-Jan31-11
I developed this chart (finalized with input from Garth) to provide comparative information re: the number of short-term
stay, long-term stay, and permanent residences shown by unit type on each alternative site plan, to address compliance
with BoCC Condition 63.aa.
FEIS Chapter 5 and BoCC Conditions
Final Phasing Plans-Jan31-11
Final Site Plans-Jan31-11
While these three files were not my work products, I thought it would be helpful to have all of this information in one place
(on the CD) as it is essential to preparation of the SEIS. Natalie would confirm that I contributed significantly to the
information conveyed on the site plans and phasing plans in order that they would serve the several purposes needed for
the SEIS.
PRIORITY WORK ITEMS STATUS REPORT
I copied to the CD the Feb28-11 version Word file of the monthly status report I prepared to facilitate
Statesman making future updates electronically. I prepared these reports every month for a year, but did not think it was
relevant to provide earlier versions now outdated.
SCHEDULE
I last prepared and circulated in October 2010 a timeframes chart to indicate the steps required in SEIS preparation and
approximately how long each step would take. The County reviewed and approved the timeframes chart, subject to the
following caveat: "This project is a high priority; however, delays due to illness, vacation, holidays, and/or other workload deadlines
may alter approximate estimated completion dates."
SEIS PRELIMINARY DOCUMENTS
I updated the preliminary draft SEIS Table of Contents and Chapter 2 yesterday (4/19/11) before copying these files to the
CD. Chapter 2 (the Description of the Proposal and Alternatives) still has many place -holder entries that require full
narrative development. If I were writing Chapter 2, 1 would likely revise the content slightly in the process of fully
developing the information, but the file provided is a good starting place. I will also send these files to David Wayne
Johnson so the County has the most current versions.
TECHNICAL REPORT REVIEW AND COMMENT
I copied three files to the CD in this folder. I reviewed and commented on many more documents, but they have advanced
past the point of my comments and are now (or soon will be, I assume) available from technical team members. Two
technical reports have been incomplete for a long time, and I was not advised of their status:
Outline for Co -Generation Report-May27-10
Lighting Proposal Edits-Dec12-10
Last I heard the on-site energy generation proposal was being shifted to an emphasis on solar power. A detailed report is
still needed on this subject, though the content may differ somewhat from the outline for the co -generation report. I
provided this outline and all of the Description of the Proposal and Alternatives files listed above to Jonathan Heller
(Ecotope) on March 15th.
TENW Alternative 3 Technical Memo-Edits-Mar2-11
included this file on the CD because I had not yet received Mike Read's final version of this technical memo to confirm
that all SEIS information requirements identified in my Feb01-11 transmittal memo have been addressed in this work
product.
One More File to Send: I forgot to copy to the 4/19/11 CD the photo inventory I took at the site on March 14, sent to
Michelle Wong, landscape architect. Having not been to the site, Michelle had several questions about the Marina
Center/Maritime Village area that could best be answered visually. I will copy the 49 -photo inventory and map keys to a
CD to send to Garth today.
The post office indicated that it may take 6 to 10 days for these CDs to reach Calgary
Vicki
Vicki Morris Consulting Services
7732 18th Avenue NE
Seattle, WA 98115-4426
206.522.8057
FAX: 206.523.4648