HomeMy WebLinkAbout001Michelle Farfan
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Swenson, Karen < kswenson@eaest.com >
Friday, January 11, 2013 1:48 PM
Craig Peck (peckassoc@comcast.net); JT Cooke (JCooke@perkinscoie.com)
Schipanski, Rich; Hollinger, Kristy; David W. Johnson; Stacie Hoskins
Information Needs
Pleasant Harbor Info Needs Memo.docx
As discussed at our meeting on Wednesd ay (1,1911, here is our lnformation Needs Memo (Phase 1, Task 3) that details
additional information that we will need to commence drafting the SEIS. We set a target of next Wednesday (Ut6l tor
submittalof these items. We realize not all of these documents will be available at that point, and we'll continue to
revise and circulate this memo as we receive the items requested.
Thanks,
Kore,w Svtt*V,aw
Ett
Karen Swenson, AICP
Senior Planner
2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 707 | Seattle, WA 98121
206.452.5350 x 1716
kswenson@eaest.com
1
HtlsruMEN-
720 Sixth Street South, Suite 100
Kirkland, WA 98033
Telephone: 425.284.5401
Fax: 425.284.5402
To:
GG:
From:
Date:
Subject:
JT Cooke, Perkins Coie; Craig Peck, P.E.
David Johnson and Stacie Hoskins, Jefferson County Planning Department
Rich Schipanski and Karen Swenson, EAlBlumen
January 10,2013
lnformation Needs for the Pleasant Harbor SEIS
The purpose of this memo is to provide a preliminary list of information needed to prepare the
Pleasant Harbor SEIS. The following table is considered a preliminary list, because it is possible
that additional information will be required as the SEPA alternatives are fully defined. We have
reviewed the information provided by the applicant to date and identified additional information
that will be required to commence with drafting the SEIS. Ultimately, all technical reports will
need to provide enough detail for adequate SEPA environmental analysis of development under
the Proposed Actions and EIS Alternatives.
We recognize that a considerable amount of existing information has been provided to date. We
have reviewed the information to determine the gaps in information, but not for the quality of the
technical reports. As we continue to review the technical reports in detail over the next week, we
may revise this table to reflect future information needs. To the extent that the information
provided is relevant to the Pleasant Harbor SEIS, it will be used to prepare, or will be referenced
in, the document. As appropriate, information from those documents will be used to prepare the
SEIS analyses. However, since new alternatives will be included in the SEIS (which exclude the
marina portion), certain information may need to be updated for the SEIS.
The following table focuses on additional information that will be needed per our discussion on
January 9, 2013. lt is assumed that the SEIS will address two development alternatives and
one No Action Alternative. The SEIS will recognize the limited redevelopment in the marina
portion of the site under the existing Binding Site Plan Permit, but that portion of the resort will
not be included in the SEIS analyses. Likewise, the potential environmental impacts from a
realigned WDFW access road to the boat ramp (as acknowledged under Alternative 2) will be
assessed under a separate permiUprocess.
The lnformation Needs table includes a column indicating our assumption about the
person/entity anticipated to be responsible for providing the requested information. Where more
than one name is provided in the responsibility column, the first name listed will have the
primary responsibility for coordinating the provision of the information. The table also indicates
the date by which the requested information will be needed (or has been provided), and the
EAIBLUMEN
Pleasant Harbor SEIS lnformation Needs
January 10,2013
1
status of receipt of the information (we will periodically update the status column as we receive
information). Refer to the updated schedule for deliverable dates.
Please contact us with any questions on the information needs below.
SOURCE
DATE
STATUSINFORMATIONNEEDS
Craig Peck;
JT - Perkins
Coie
1/161) Earth: Final Geotechnical lnvestigation,
Subsurface Group, January 9, 2008
This report should address the following (as
detailed in the Pleasant Harbor Scoping
Notice):. Geologyo Soils. Topography. Slopes. Erosiono Unique Physical Features
2l Water: Water Supply and Groundwater
lmpact Analysis,2007.
JT - Perkins
Coie
1/16 Rcv'd
(Appendix 5
ot DEIS)
3) Fish and Wildlife: Habitat Management
Plan, GeoEngineers, 2012.
JT - Perkins
Coie
1/16
4) Transportation:
Correspondence/documentation of d iscussion
to construct an alternative WDFW boat ramp
access road
JT - Perkins
Coie
1/16
David -
County;
JT - Perkins
Coie
1/165) Air Quality: ESA Review comments on
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Report by Failsafe
Canada (2012)
JT - Perkins
Coie
1/166) Plants: Narrative landscaping plan
7) Plants: Confirmation with the County that
tree removal/retention can be addressed in
terms of acreage, not individual trees and their
diameter.
JT - Perkins
Coie
David
Johnson-
County
1/16
EAIBLUMEN
Pleasant Harbor SEIS lnformation Aleeds
January 10,2013
2
Elements of the Environment
SOURGE NEEDED
DATE
STATUSNEEDS
JT - Perkins
Coie
1/168) Fiscal Analysis: Fiscal Analysis Report
9) Utilities: Electrical documentation
regarding electrical demand/load and PUD's
response when development causes PUD to
reach capacity.
JT - Perkins
Coie
1/16
10) Utilities: Telecommunications, Cable and
Solid Waste - contacts for providers
Don
Coleman
1/16 EA will
contact;
Craig to
provide
Coleman's
phone
number
111 Public Seruices - Medical: Confirmation
that a medical clinic will be included in the
project
JT - Perkins
Coie
1/16
12) Revised Alternatives Description (edits to
12-12-2011 version).
Craig Peck 1/16
13) Revised phasing maps to exclude marina
area under existing BSP
Craig Peck 1/16
29) Provide a list of existing permits that
would affect the site (i.e. regarding the Pleasant
Harbor Resort).
JT - Perkins
Coie
1/16
30) Provide a list of all Jefferson County
permits and approvals that would be required
as part of the Proposed Action and future
development.
JT - Perkins
Coie
1/16
31) Provide a list of Federal and/or State
permits and approvals that would be required
as part of the Proposed Action and future
development.
JT - Perkins
Coie
1/16
EAIBLUMEN
Pleasant Harbor SEIS lnformation Needs
January 10,2013
3
Altematives lnformation
Permits
SOURGE
DATE
NEEDED STATUSINFOR]I,IATION NEEDS
JT - Perkins
Coie
1/16Digital Copies of all documents provided in
paper form (MS Word preferred; Adobe pdf
documents acceptable)
Draft Zoning Regulations for Pleasant
Harbor MPR
JT - Perkins
Coie
1/16
Draft Development Agreement for Pleasant
Harbor
JT - Perkins
Coie
1/16
Project Objectives (required by SEPA)JT - Perkins
Coie
1/16
EAIBLUMEN
Pleasant Harbor SEIS lnformation Needs
January 10,2013
4